/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>>847180

I would argue communist infiltration and subversion involves much more than just words but here's a rebuttal against cucked """Christians""" anyway:

It Can Be Wrong to Turn the Other Cheek

Liberalism and Progressivism spread that Catholic Charity always demands us not to reply to any offense our enemies make against us, no matter what. If we act otherwise, we would be disobedient to the precept of Our Lord who told us to “offer the other cheek.” This groundless generalization of that wise precept does not fit with the traditional interpretation made by the ordinary Magisterium of the Church.

Today we bring to our readers a text by the famous moralist Fr. Victor Catherein, SJ, (1845- 1931), which reflects well the teachings of the Church on this topic. He tells us that self-defense and the proper punishment of the aggressor are included in the interpretation of that precept.

Fr. Victor Cathrein, SJ

The Divine Master says: “But I say to you not to resist evil: but if one strike thee on thy right cheek, turn to him also the other” (Matt 5:39).

This precept, as noted by both St. Augustine (Ep. 138 ad Marcel, Migne, PL 33, 530) and St. Thomas (Summa Theologiae II,II, q. 40, a.1, ad 2), deals only with the interior disposition of the person who is offended. We should not take revenge, but suffer the offenses and be disposed to not defend ourselves from any aggression if there is nothing on our part, the aggressor’s part or that of the common good that demands that we act differently.

Indeed, when Christ stood before the high priest Annas, he did not offer the other cheek when one of the servants standing by slapped His Face (John 18:22-23). He also did not return the aggression, but simply defended Himself, so that no one could judge that He had lacked due respect for the high priest.

Many times the position of the one being offended requires that he defend himself from the aggression or that he have recourse to the authority to obtain due satisfaction for the unjust wrong made against him. Other times, public security demands that injustices be punished. Finally, the good of the aggressor himself sometimes requires that he be punished, as St. Augustine teaches us when he says: “We should act with beneficial rigor against recalcitrant persons, because he who loses the liberty to practice evil is more easily conquered for the good. Nothing is more unfortunate than the happiness of sinners, which allows them to do wrong with impunity and confirms them in their bad will” (Ep. 138 ad Marcel, Migne, PL, 33, 531).

(Christian Humility, Petrópolis: Vozes, 1925, p. 140)

And muslims were defeated and became an historical footnote by those who then were defeated by subversion so muslims are doubly weak.

Didnt muzzies get defeated by trying to to invade constinople but were defeated by storm?

LMAO

Also isn't there own religion getting beaten by the internet and indonesia becoming christian, half of iran left islam, and mayalasia one dude emptying mosques and underground churches are growing quickly, and islam cucked to the left to get to their goals and caught with their own humanitarian aid being caught as anti semitic, how does being to weak or strong stop it from being the truth?

Also didn't they get their asses kicked by christians? And ever since before america and colonialism began (islam started with colonizing just were horrible at it and just as inhumane monstrous and wiped out entire populations and on purpose for not converting to islam, armenians genocide became recent, but since the world was watching it probably stopped) lets not forget zionism and jews are using them as puppets and communism would've subverted them as successfully and destroying them from within if they clearly wanted and then their countries when left to its own devices are hellholes due to fighting each other over pitiful differences and being over represented in nearly every negative thing one can think of.

>>848694

Catholics aren't Christian

>>848714

And the moon landing was a hoax

>>847180

So what? Muslim's aren't doing any better, the next generation in Muslim countries are roughly 30% Athiest and a greater portion non-religious, and unlike Christianity once it's entrenchment in Eastern cultures is gone I don't think they'll be able to persist like Christians do.

>>848721

This islam is already dying out, half of iran are no longer islam underground churches are growing rapidly and indonesia if it keeps up would have the same amount of christians than they are muslims, countries that used to be 100% muslim are decreasing and sudan especially south sudan are now majorly christian the only hope we have is if france gets it's act together and northern nigera takes back what is rightfully their's.

>>848721

But after islam is dead I am sure satan is going to replace it with something far worse in 21st century or future standards