Remember
>The Christ myth theory is a fringe theory, supported by few tenured or emeritus specialists in biblical criticism or cognate disciplines. It is criticised for its outdated reliance on comparisons between mythologies, and deviates from the mainstream historical view.
Practically no other atheistic scholars take these goofs seriously, to the point of even Bart D. Errorman ripping into Atwill . He's not as much of a kook as Dorothy Milne Murdock/Acharya S, but that's hardly a high bar to clear.
Seriously, look her up, her 'theories' are hilarious.
The historicity of Christ was a legitimate discussion in the mid-18th and 19th centuries, and was eventually resolved in the favour of the truth we'd already held. All that's left is the atheist equivalent to flat earthers doing a better impression of the 'obstinate fanatic who refuses to accept reality' than we ever could.
As concerns the Jesuits, pic related.