>>784304
>What's wrong with the first among equals interpretation?
First of all, it's completely democratic! If you actually look the term itself, it comes from Roman forms of governments (and even later on, to modern democratic philosophy).
For a bunch of guys who like to finger-wag Latins for "roman paganism" (perhaps, not you, but certainly others), the Orthodox have no issue with using Roman Political theory, seems kind of hypocritical.
As for your quotes, nobody denies that Christ is the supernatural, invisible, supreme Head of the True Church, but Christ Himself declared that He would build a Church, and it would be upon Cephas. As to the function of Christ's Church, and Cephas, both would be "given the power to loosen and bind on Heaven and Earth". One working in concert with the other. Primacy. A servant given the keys, it will make sense if one ponders on it.
As for the apparent disconnect between your quotes, you should do a bit more reading. A "universal bishop", would be a Bishop whom is Bishop over all, the Pope is the big red stamp on matters of the Church, but the Pope in Rome is not, at the same time, Bishop of other places.
>>784307
>Dr. Raphael Johnson is a professional researcher and former university professor. He is a priest and historian of the Russian Orthodox church.
Surely he is doing himself a disservice then. Are slavs even aryan? The Germans, the Russians, didn't they fight a war or something?