>>783198
>Okay let's roll with that, Emperor Meiji is the winner and Tokugawa's entire dynasty is a bunch of losers piggybacking on the successes of others.
And no denying that.
>But wait, Meiji's dynasty was also defeated, WW2 brought an end to his descendants (or the military's rule rather) rule in all but name, so, the Japanese Emperors are just losers, Japanese as a whole are losers, after all the Americans, the Russians and the Chinese won.
Following that logic, only the jews have won so far.
>You posted this from a PC you dumbass, why not live in the woods without running water and electricity if you despise technology so much?
Maybe I should.
>I guess it's better to become the colony of a foreign power instead of modernizing and leaving behind isolation like Meiji did yes? Bugger off.
Modernizing is cancerous, and the fact you christians worship show what fruits you saw.
>Bullshit, the entire point of the war was ultimately isolationism and technological stagnation Vs interventionism and innovation, the latter won and short term saved Japan.
Idiot detected, BOTH the Tokugawa and the Imperial clans have foreign backers and advisors, BOTH embrace foreign ideology and in fact the shogunate were willing to sede more land for the foreign power. The Boshin war was a case of internal power struggle heated up by outside force.
>it did have 200 years of peace & prosperity, the Joseon dynasty as a whole was a golden age for Korea and it definitely trumped Japan in terms of rulers
I don't see any technology, culture or even music of that era, they remained an occupied of China.
>they repelled an invasion from your 'superior' Japan during this time exactly.
You mean the Hideyoshi one? In that period, they were indeed occupied by Ming and were saved by the chinks.
>China during this time was also ruled by the Ming dynasty and that trumps anything pre-Meiji Japan ever accomplished, the Ming dynasty is one of the greatest eras of peace, prosperity and advancement of humanity in all of history
What? The Ming era is so bad it actually LOSES territory and got shallowed up by the Manchu, a much smaller kingdom due to corruption and infighting.
>Japan was a lowly nobody from both outsider and internal view in comparison to Ming China.
Yet never once they were occupied by any chink force.
>There's also a case to be made for the Mughal Empire being far more successful than Tokugawa's Japan but I won't go into that for I'm not that well informed about them.
Don't know what that is.
>And this is just Asia, Christendom was miles ahead of the Tokugawa Shogunate to the point where it's not even a contest.
Which "Christendom"? The secularized, Renaissance and Enlightened Christendom? That one? The one you supposedly hate?
>The US is a secular country since it's founding and the only influence it has on Japan is that, a secular one, China has a bigger Christian influence on modern Japan for crying out loud.
Yet it's also the force that forces Christianity on Japan on the threat of country attack if they dare repelling christian corruption.
>So the real way the Japanese people saw the Tokugawa
Hold it, one poem doesn't mean jackshit.
The majority of the people enjoy 200 years of peace ushered by the end of the sengoku jidai. Butthurt losers mad that someone doesn't make that untrue.
>it's 3 leaders doesn't matter
They don't since only Tokugawa won and maintained his rule. Winning power is easy, keeping it is hard.
>You speak a lot yet know nothing
I know more than you, christcuck.
>Japan succeeded mostly because the Emperor had no formal opposition to Westernization,
They succeeded because BOTH sides wanted to westernize, be it shogunate or imperial, unlike everyone else in Asia who is incredibly hesistant to it.
>and so Meiji's ideas triumphed.
Neither sides resisted westernization, retard.