/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>one guy does thing

>all of us need to offer an explanation

also there's already two threads

>>731029

>This dude could have killed them with the flu or something.

OP, if they don't receive the gospel they are going to experience real death and have their souls cast into the Lake of Fire for all eternity.

>>731036

>saving people that are most likely saved via absolute ignorance, and already held to the metric of natural law

>>731042

go read Paul

>>731038

Why did Jesus tell His disciples to teach all nations if those who never heard the gospel were automatically saved?

Search the catalog next time, kike.

>>12451443

>>731066

>>731065

Oops, wrong board. Still, this is a troll thread. We don't ask you to explain yourself everytime usury is committed.

>>731038

People aren’t automatically saved because of complete ignorance of Christ. They might be saved DESPITE their ignorance, but it’s incredibly dangerous to assume so.

I think he is an idiot Evangelical subhuman but he did good. JC's word has more value.

Hey everyone, let’s play “spot the Redditor”!

>>731038

There are several errors in this reasoning.

While it's true that some of them may be saved they are not saved BY invincible ignorance: they are saved by the Grace and mercy of God. The fact God is merciful should not make us disobey his will to preach the Gospel to everyone on Earth.

Second, we are not sure they follow natural law in that way, were Aztecs saved since they were under invincible ignorance? Not at all, they lived against natural law, practiced human sacrifices, they went to hell, and so did all tribes that practiced cannibalism.

>>731038

tigger. Absolute ignorance doesn't assure salvation. Go read Pius IX on that subject.

All things are lawful; but not all things are expedient.