>>668913
>I wonder if this correlation implies a causation
I don't know if you're trolling or not, but it's a possibility.
>>668914
>trash and abominable. I cant believe that someone actually likes this
I mean, the idea itself isn't that bad. It is one solution to the savage pagan issue. That is, the savage out in the jungle that has never heard the name of Christ. And I know that one anon mentioned that people could be saved if they follow the natural law, but that seems dangerously close to Pelagianism to me
>>668914
>ok, thats not at all bad
I glad someone else thinks so. Violence is horrible.
>they were vegetarian, not because they loved animals, but because they hated them
I've never heard of that before. I heard that many gnostics (particularly Cathars) didn't eat animals because they contain reincarnated people or something along those lines.
>preferred sodomy
As in homosexuality, or non-procreative sex? To be honest, I like the latter. But I guess I'm a fag for liking trannies and muscles. So much to the point where I will convulse and pass out after masturbating to trannies, little boys, and muscular men and women.
>>668918
>Sometimes it's okay to not know.
I guess that is where faith comes into play, huh? I'm a very scientific/logically minded individual, so it's hard for me to accept things that I can't know. I guess I have to pray more.