/aus/ - Australia★

>>122869

You're a Indigenous Australian then?

We can't charg… I mean share with us your tribal customs.

fug

>>122966

>The fact is if you write something on the internet you're 'publishing' it where ever anybody reads, and if "vilifying" someone is an offense in Victoria and someone in Victoria reads it you've potentially committed a criminal offense in Victoria.

My point exactly!

If they read it, and live in the cancer known as Victoria - they can get you in NSW, SA, WA, QLD, TAS and NT, CAN. Thats how those two; Vivienne Legg and Dyson Devine got fucked in the A.

Since they lived in NSW and didn't intend to go to the Tribunal summons (and said they weren't going to go) since they thought VIC law doesn't apply in NSW (I wouldn't have thought so either) they were found in contempt and brought to Victoria - using Victorian police, whom travel over 1500 km to get them. The hearing for contempt from what I read was to be the next day, they were not remanded in custody and left before that hearing - Only for the Victorian police to bring them back down to Melbourne again. They were goaled for not attending a summons in Victoria - not vilification, that was a separate issue.

Now the weird part:

Later, that McKee bloke posted his father's case (held in NSW) regarding a suit brought forward by that Gary Burns gay-lord to two other people (one was McKee's father): one in QLD, the other in VIC. Apparently, the judge sitting in that case had ruled that Gary Burns could not use anti-vilification/discrimination laws of NSW against people whom live in other states as NCAT, the NSW tribunal through which the complaint was filed, has no jurisdiction over those states as set out in the Australian Constitution, which has already framework for interstate disputes which NCAT as well as other Tribunals within the country cannot challenge (in essence, tribunals are not courts - due to separation of powers). If this is true, and I have no reason to think it isn't - how is it that VIC police/Tribunal can violate the law in this regard and abduct two people from their own homes some distance away without any legal consequence or reprimand? It was never legal to do so.

Yet, in the State of Victoria - their laws trump ours?

Does this make sense to anyone?

In the previous neet thread (link in OP) it was pointed out that:

>Unlike other jurisdictions, Western Australian law imposes criminal but not civil sanctions against racial vilification. In Western Australia, the Criminal Code was amended in 1989 to criminalise the possession, publication and display of written >or pictorial material that is threatening or abusive with the intention of inciting racial hatred or of harassing a racial group. [35] Penalties range between 6 months and two years imprisonment. It is noteworthy that the Western Australian >legislation only addresses written or pictorial information - not verbal comments. The emphasis on written material arose in direct response to the racist poster campaigns of the Australian Nationalist Movement in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

If a case is filed in Victoria and the target was in WA, Victorian Law would attempt to overrule WA law and would feel justified in doing so.

How on earth is this legal? Could someone please explain?

NSW Lawcase that McKee had provided that says such things have no jurisdiction in other states

https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/58900a94e4b058596cba3975

The OTO Lawcase against Vivienne Legg and Dyson Devine that believes differently

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2007/1484.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=Vivienne%20Legg%20and%20Dyson%20Devine

More on that

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinosrch.cgi?query=Vivienne+Legg+and+Dyson+Devine&results=50&submit=Search&mask_world=&mask_path=&callback=on&method=auto&meta=%2Fau

>>123128

Just to add MSM articles:

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/couple-jailed-for-contempt-in-vilification-case/2008/02/20/1203467183354.html

http://www.news.com.au/national/critics-of-occult-group-freed/news-story/7222b3dbfe1ebc83b677bc39bf2fde98

>>123680

OP here

Looks like 8ch.net has been hacked again..

According to sudo, https://8ch.net/sudo/res/34073.html

>Sunshine has no pubkeys anymore, and it's unlikely to be cracked until 2030

Which sounds like massive bullshit for the plebs still here to eat up.

Also from the /sudo/ thread:

>Anon1: >>34227

>Yeah but sunshine was started by Hotwheels and the board log was also implemented by him and I wouldn't be surprised if this too was a practice started by him

>Anon2: >>34224

> >>34228

>wasn't this because of that Adelaide shit? Aussie bitches are such whores.

>Anon3:>>34296

>wasn't this because of that Adelaide shit? Aussie bitches are such whores.

>IP logging of POSTS was due to that.

>IP logging of mod actions is a different subject. So far I have no idea when this practice was started and why

>I think Anon2: >>34299

>For what purpose would that have forced post IP logging? This isn't an ausfaglia website, we are not bound by their laws.

Anon2 is obviously wrong, information has indeed been handed over to the Aus Police - even though he is correct that 8ch.net is not bound to Australian Law at all.

It is tempting to think that it WAS because of the Adelaide nudes thread that IP logging of POSTS came about because of that, if true - well done boys - we are most probably on a watch list of some kind.

Speaking about watch lists:

https://8ch.net/aus/res/123659.html

It kinda obvious they aren't going to target lebs/arabs (Why destroy a enemy when it is in your interests to keep them alive and well) and they aren't going to attack Neo-Nazi's in Australia (lets face it, neo-whatever basically means "New Jewish Controlled Op" - see neo-conservative in the states and abroad or John Safran https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohjRSC4DL4Y&feature=youtu.be&t=19m9s, The whole video basically says the same shit)

According to this thread: >The Commissioner also intends the new unit to be a resource for parents worried about their children being dangerously influenced.

>“The views of a young person, under the wrong influence, could change in a matter of days or weeks,” he said, “We want parents to be able to contact the Fixated Persons Investigations Unit and get some help.”

Meaning; if you start becoming 'red-pilled' and your very worried hippy mother finds out, you're screwed and will be labeled insane or unfit on some government database (good bye job prospects) - NEETS be-warned. That is more related to NSW than the other states but they, I would imagine, would follow suit very soon.

Simply put, I'm leaving for what appears to be greener pastures. I no longer trust the admins here at all.

P.S 8ch.pl may be an alternative but their privacy policy is non-existent as the .pdf link supplied by them leads to a 404. Take that as you will.

As for archiving links… tbh I cannot be fucked. It all feels quiet hopeless ATM.

Good luck.

>>131582

I think you might be missing the point.