>>10227
>I call it a "bitchfest" because it is so repetitive, not because of the subject matter.
If you constantly come across the racial issue and the rest of us don't then you may consider the common denominator. I'll also point out you brought it up yourself.
>I specifically said that is the first and only way I judge people.
And that is why you're flawed. Their nature leads to their actions. As the person who refuses to hear explosions or the person who cannot see colour you have blinded yourself. Classic "the frog and the scorpion".
>That's not the way it is.
Says "Anonymous of the Internet" on the authority of "Anonymous of the Internet".
>Both nature and nurture have an effect on a person's development<…>
No actual disagreement. But even the top 1% black has no purpose to live amongst us in our society. We do not want his genetics, his people need his. Brain drain is in fact a large part of why the third world stays that way. Same reason no african has a purpose in our faith, he has his own ancestors and gods. You mistake "there is no place for them amongst us" with "destroy them all". Wasps have no place in our houses, they're also objectively inferior to us by the things we measure ourselves to be. We simply keep them out of our houses. Also, nature is the hard cap on what is possible, nuture cannot excede nature which is the important takeaway (I'm eagerly awaiting you nuturing your own gills, should you disagree). It's also the reason I accuse you of cultural semitism: to see a thing by what it can be and not what it is is the modernist outlook to a T. Another reason I suspect you either aren't part of our faith or a good one. We're mindful of the needs of trees, we just don't ask them to take a vote in our thing because they are unable to contribute. If a magic tree that can speak wishes to be heard, we'll do it, but no such trees have appeared. Even if they did, their place is in the forest amongst the rest of the trees creating even more magic talking trees, and we'd further deny to have half-tree, half-norse children with them.
>Your argument against gays stands on the idea that being gay is somehow "catching", that allowing open homosexuality will cause gays to "convert" straight people. It doesn't work like that. You know the way you like women, do you think that could ever be altered by anyone else? Gays are born to feel like that about men. It's not something you can persuade people to change.
Hahahahahahahahaha….
Oh wait, you're serious.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oh man… Yes, that's why 50% of people say they're at least bisexual now in certain places. Why we went from a few fringe mental cases to a society-wide issue. Good for a chuckle if nothing else. One cannot fault your dedication to "not be too extreme and nice to everybody :)" attempts, one can only fault the fact that isn't reality. Your foundational principle is flawed, ergo every conclusion you draw from it will be equally incorrect. Fractal wrongness, if you will.
>It's not my fault that both sides of the schism have some unreasonable or ridiculous ideals.
I know man what is with all the strong opinions? They're strong so they're wrong, why can't we just let people do whatever? That's the real way the world works dude, just lighten up. There's no physical laws of best practices so lets just calm down haha.
>Are you saying that the only thing that separates Asatru from the Judaic religions is their attitude towards race?
I'm saying the only thing that separates YOU from the Judaic religions is… well… nothing. Materialism, Modernity, Potentiality, Egalitarianism, et al. you have every checkmark checked. It's not even that you're a good heathen that disagrees with me it is that you aren't even a heathen at all. Had you studied and comprehended any body of literature you would at least argue with me using the language of our faith. You cannot manage this, you use sophistic rationalism, only those with no body of theology do this when faced with religious matters. Further, even in purely nihilistic atheistic levels the things we appose are measurable ills. There is an entire secular body of the differences (usual inferiority) of other races, of the deleterious effects of homosexuality and so on. http://ropeculture.org/2016/03/01/the-fag-agenda/
>I was never a member of an Judaic religion. I despised them as soon as I was taught their real principles, the idea that everyone is innately evil unless they are "forgiven" by the church. That is the key difference between their faith and this one. You don't have nearly enough reason to accuse me of their mindset.
Then why do you know absolutely nothing of our faith? What kind of heathen, precisely, are you supposed to be? I'd like to see you defend any of these statements with anything out of our texts or theological spectrum.