/x/ - Paranormal

>>56414

Some people have gotten caught up in this so that they can have something to be blackmailed with (or so the stories go). It got me thinking about movements trying to legalize it as being some kind of collaboration to shed themselves of their blackmailable evidence. I'm sure that's not the case at all but it's a neat "what if?" scenario to think about.

>>56464

Soviets did something similar, they would have women secretly film themselves having sex with politicians and then blackmail them by releasing the footage. Funny story, they did this to some Romania guy iirc and he actually asked them for the tape so he could release it himself because he wanted to brag about fucking a hot russian spy lol.

But this is obviously much more sinister and morally bankrupt if it involves children. The Case of Johnny Gosch is very similar.

>>56414

He made an update video. Hes planning on making a second part, explaining what happened with it being taken off of youtube, and discusses how already the websites and people he pointed out in the first video are already changing their online activity

Reading the wikipedia article on pizzagate is very interesting based on how its written. Its as if its just blatantly a false conspiracy theory, but makes no real attempt to debunk it. They should list out all the reasons people believe in it, and then explain how and why those are wrong, but it doesnt do that. It either presents the pieces of the theory without mentioning why they are suspecious, or by just listing out strawmen to knock down. For example they list the bands The Sex Stains and Heavy Breathing as part of the theory and just leave it as that, as if just because they performed there they are unfairly targetted by conspiracy theorist. It doesnt mention video of them performing at the venue while directly making reference to pedophilia or that their music video features a lot of pedophilia symbolism. Like it doesnt even attempt to write this off as edgy and provocative artist, it just doesnt mention any of this.

>>56414

Part 2

Try searching Pipergate,its even worse. For more info about this search for the weird videos threads with the kids and use the honeypot link. Working still are

I've known for a long time that the people involved in this use personal and staged photos that contain content that to the initiated can be deciphered and lead to some real nightmare bullshit.

from boychat.org:

They are a representative portion of the population ranging in age from teenagers to older people who share the single bond of having a particular affinity for pubescent and/or prepubescent boys. In most cases this encompasses a clearly sexual attraction, plus an ability to relate to boys in an almost magical way. Many choose not to act upon their sexual attraction, while others strongly advocate boys' freedom to choose. Most of those posters accept the label 'boy lover'. Some posters are (or were) boys who love older men. Also, there are usually a few posters who do not identify as boy lovers, and who range from supportive to hateful. While the great majority of our posters are male, we do have some women posters. Women boylovers seem fairly rare, but they do exist and they are certainly welcome, as are non-BL posters who follow the rules.

Interesting how people like this arrogantly swagger around the internet while politicians send SWAT teams to shut down churches.

However, I'm not in law enforcement, and have close to zero I can actually do about this that is contributing in any way. When I checked a link he had already reported on the video, voila, still there, not taken down, and cybertip.org just seems like a way to record IP addresses of people they may deem enemies of their sex trafficking?

Always use TOR, at the very least.

>>57810

>Why is it that imgsrc.ru is almost exclusively little girls?

Is it? I just looked and there are lots of categories, the family->kids one is mostly normal family pics with some girl pics.It's mostly old home photos or from social media.

The nudity category isn't even nudes, it's regular adults in swimsuits. There's nothing special on this site.

>>57814

What I SHOULD have said is that when you put "imgsrc.ru" into Yandex search engine, you are flooded with pics of little girls.

I looked at imgsrc.ru itself and it is basically photobucket, as you said.

But, anyway,

What can one do that does not involve dragging their eyeballs through reams of inappropriate pictures of kids? Fortunately for me, I didn't see any of the more raunchy stuff, but I am human, and the eye is the light of the body, and I don't want to sift through ten thousand images of lolis to find the "treasure" of one where there is abuse occurring, and have to further defecate my eyes by visiting the site to verify it is what I suspect it is, but on the other hand unless you see it, if you report it to whoever in law enforcement isn't tasked with being the security team for the pedos, and it's dud, you just wasted their time.

Only the NSA et al have the tools to tackle this properly.

It literally causes my heart to feel congested, physically, when I get near this crap.

I really, REALLY appreciate the work done by REAL crime fighters, but this avenue of crime fighting is just not my place. I am doing whatever I do elsewhere, but having to swim in sewage naked with my eyes open and no mask or ability to really ever wash the stink off is not where God has called me to be.

This world is an evil place. I will focus on the good that I can actually do in my lane. I don't think that this is my lane, especially since I have no official authority or capacity to actually do much about it.

I do keep my eyes open for kids in public who are being very closely corralled by an adult who does not really resemble them and who also look miserable. It's funny when you start opening your eyes, what you notice.

I still haven't popped the question yet, "Is that your daddy? Do you know him?" I cringe to think of being in a situation where the answer was "no."

But, I am ready to ask the question. It's in stark contrast to this garralous little girl who came into a place I was once and just spontaneously rattled off her name, and the name of her brother, mother, and father who were present. I didn't even ask. But, that was the opposite end of the spectrum from what I am just peripherally on the lookout for.

Fight on, dudes. This line of research is not really my cup of tea.

>>57816

What is even the purpose of this? You're not going to find anything other than mildly exciting or disgusting things by looking online like this. It's all going to be legal pics, sometimes of diaper babies, which is just the same shit fetish as you see on a board on this site or on pornhub. Disgusting but nothing special.

Some people produce illegal things and those end up online but they won't post that in the open for obvious reasons. If you look around imageboards, the smaller ones, for a while you'll easily get an idea of how this works, and there's nothing you're going to do about stopping any actual rapes. All vids and images are years old and the acts long since passed. Unless you're the police, why look for this? Seems suspicious imo. I don't want to see the shit I accidentally come across. Actively looking for it doesn't work in your favor, if you get what I mean.

>>56488

Sorry but, if you dont think there is a group of elites who blackmail powerful individuals you're fucking retarded. They used to just do it with whores but when it became "acceptable" to sleep around they shifted gears to kiddie shit.

>>57562

Part 3