/v/ - Video Games

Good

nice video games

>oneangryfaggot

fuck off with your clickbaity trash

Was this officially sponsored by Nintendo or did a bunch of fags that just happen to work at Nintendo attend while slapping their name on banners?

Nintendo is just as shitty as any other company and doesn't deserve any support.

Why do these niggers use so many fucking hashtags? I get it's for tagging purposes but I have to read out hashtag every time and it sounds autistic.

>>16658538

I know you said the furries are the worst part of this to get furry discussion going so more art is posted, and not just furry art, gay furry art, because you are implying that the gay part isn't the worst.

post straight furry art

>>16658577

>post straight furry art

seconded

>>16658581

>furry

>straight

>good art

If you pick the first two alone, you have already demolished most of the FUR COMMUNITY

>>16658559

>clickbait

In what way is it clickbait?

How can one be proud about taking cocks in the ass? Why are people so obnoxious about who they fucked or got fucked by?

>>16658586

I've unironically seeing legit good art work and it being straight and furry. I'd go find it but it means I'd have to go look. maybe later Search Eveelutions, look up dagasi.

>>16658590

Dagasi does tons of shota and traps though.

>>16658598

Does he? I have a filter set to filter out the shit I don't like.

>>16658554

Oh right.

>>16658561

Probably the latter. Nintendo of America is pure cancer.

>>16658577

>>16658581

>>>/out/

>>16658588

There's been a ton of that sort of faggotry recently. Lots of cuckchan complaining about threads we've always had discussing vidya politics.

>>16658538

>kemono

>furry

pick one.

>>16658611

Furfags should unironically kill themselves

>>16658539

that poor creature is going to get so much proud pounding

>>16658617

you too buddy

>>16658588

It's fucking oneangryfaggot, a website designed from the ground up to be a clickbait/outrage porn farm, this shit is no different, surprising no one. Wouldn't surprise me if clickbait fag paypigged for them too.

>>16658622

how and why the fuck is this shit allowed but saying lol black hahaha isn't?

Remember that if you're gonna buy a Switch, for whatever stupid reason, here's the hierarchy chain

Importing from Japan > Importing from Nintendo of Europe >= Importing from any other Nintendo chain depends if they even exist >>>>>> (((NoA)))

Iwata's rolling in his fucking grave and NoA's nippon overlords need to hear of this.

>>16658622

Which is arguably worse, the chinese eating dogs, arabs gassing stray dogs and poisoning them, or this shit?

>>16658615

>last pic

nani da fuck?

>>16658639

Put it this way, you end up in hell implying this isn't hell and the demons turn you into a dog to relive one of the three over and over. Which would you rather not be subjected to?

Also I really hope none of you end in Hell

>>16658635

Cube you're still a faggot.

>nintendo

>kemonofurfags

>pride parade

That's a big yikes.

>>16658559

He is goobergrape though, that's not clickbait.

>>16658634

>that faggot is a german and tranny that claims to have PTSD and thinks he is a jedi

Wew lad.

>>16658662

You're also a faggot.

>>16658538

Mark will defend this.

>>16658667

>speaking his name

Quiet yourself anon, lest he shows himself.

>>16658686

I'm sure he's into that sort of thing, but he'd probably rather be the one on the leash.

>>16658698

>those hashtags

Jesus twitter just destroys neurons doesn’t it?

>>16658712

>toxic

>>16658707

It amazes me how despite the character limit twitter users still manage to cram loads of useless shit in their posts.

>>16658679

>NEVER SUPPORT JEWS IN ANY FORM, IN ANY INDUSTRY.

too late, go through the raw ingredients in your pantry and look at how many labels have Kosher Pareve or Orthodox Union certification, marked with a circled "K" and circled "U" respectively.

Im not saying followers of the Torah are bad. If anything its a testament to how resourceful and influential this group is. They have been able to get an inspector on virtually every supply chain to ensure that the product is in line with their code. The code in regards to kosher foods serves primarily to ensure the health of the consumer which is pretty noble. Many old laws in Abrahamic religions were there to ensure people stayed healthy. I even consider the islamic practice of bowing and praying to mecca each day as a way to cause a daily awareness of back strength and flexibility (bowing) and mental focus/stability (praying).

You may or may not believe in a god, but studies of EEG scans show better brain activity when someone "prays" regularly. This could be to a god, or this could simply be meditation. I forget the conclusions, but one said something akin to "its like taking a deep breath with your brain."

Sorry for the blog post, but I thought this thread deserved something other than anons getting mad about NoA being poz af and people posting or getting mad at furries.

> Waah, gay people exist

Hate fags all you want, but this shit doesn't deserve a thread. Take it to your shitty #GG politics/twatter shitposting thread and stop shitting up the board.

>>16658609

More like there's lots of cuckchanners making new threads about every little insignificant thing that happens on twitter. This thread is fine because it's about a major publisher attending a large public event, it's the threads about "random indie developer says retarded thing on twitter" that I take issue with.

And honestly, OAG is on par with Kotaku in terms of journalistic quality, his articles are complete crap, the only difference is that his exteme bias goes in a direction we agree with. Remember to take his stuff with a grain of salt and do your own research.

>>16658611

>Eevee

That crosses the line from furry and goes into straigt up bestiality. It's well drawn though, I'll give it that.

>>16658637

>nani da fuck?

Please go back to wherever you came from.

>>16658732

>This thread is fine

It's filled with literal furfags who fuck animals

>>16658734

Just like all those lolicons who rape kids right?

>>16658735

Furnigger detected

>>16658732

>straigt

It aint bestiality if it can talk. Dragonite or Labras iirc is more intelligent than humans somehow

>>16658735

>giving him another (You) when he used literally the same bait twice in a row

>>16658740

Yeah man, you really found me out, cause I was totally trying to sneak around that fact.

>>16658734

Well, the topic is fine at least. It just got derailed instantly because OP decided to be a faggot. Might as well go full on with the furry posting, it's not like there's anything else of value here.

Say it with me, anons.

YIFF IN HELL, FURNIGGERS

>Iwata dies

>Switch launches

>new games completely stop being made for 3DS

>Reggie retires

>Nintendo starts attending pride parades

fuck /v/ros it's like they're a whole different company or something…

>>16658757

So straight shota?

>>16658782

I think Iwata was really holding a lot of this bullshit back, now it's in full force. It's astounding how so much of the industry has veered into full fucking Marxism.

Glad to have a backlog at least. Maybe gaming can be restored in another decade or so but giving money to any of these companies is a bad idea now.

What the fucked changed? Does anyone know? It wasn't always like this. Why has this shit been so wildly pushed?

>>16658797

>>>/tv/

Remember when nintendo hired a woman who promoted pedophilia on her twitter account and refused to fire her? Then they found out she was a prostitute and cam girl who would cosplay nintendo characters and fired her for the cosplaying bit?

Nintendo can fuck off.

>>>/v/16658732

>Please go back to wherever you came from.

no (You).

It's just Nintendo of America

We've known they're retards for over a decade

Nintendo itself is still fine

>>16658804

An increase of cuckchan users

>>16658804

>anti-fur hate on /v/

Because furfags swarmed the site since 2017?

>>16658811

Is that when you got here?

>>16658812

Try again newfag, I've been here since 2015.

>>16658811

videogames have created almost as many furries as Disney.

>rouge the bat

>krystal

>coco & tawna bandicoot

so on and so forth

>i-it all got ruined in 2017!

<"i've been here for 2 years!"

go back to reddit kid.

>>16658814

>2015

Nice try newfag

>>16658839

Anime fans replaced furries as the faggots who can't stop shoving their shit in everything. It used to be fursonas every where, now it's fucking anime every where. Exact same degenerate shit and you all need roping up for it.

>>16658843

>implying anime is anything new

>>16658837

>>16658842

>>16658849

How many proxies are you behind right now

>>16658820

>videogames have created almost as many furries as Disney.

The same argument saying vidya makes mass killers. Try again fucktard.

<"i've been here for 2 years!"

>2019-2015 = 2

Did you graduate grade school?

>>16658834

And they spread to any other boards they inhabit. The point isn't just proliferation, but dispersion.

>>16658852

>The same argument saying vidya makes mass killers

Do you even know what a furry is?

>>16658855

Does anyone?

>>16658678

>I'm not a furry

It's ok Mark, you're safe here.

>>16658686

I've seen that cropped image too many times to count on 10 hands.

>>16658720

#notallfurries

>>16658732

That was my original intent, to prove that there is well drawn straight shit. Obviously

>not liking feral

clearly you are not yet down the path of pure degeneracy

>>16658735

Ignore him anon, he's just upset.

>>16658741

You know soy doesn't turn you into a woman right? Ingesting soy in extremely amounts wouldn't even do shit as long as you work out and do shit.

>>16658850

Anime on anime boards is very different to an endless flood of anime. Same way starfox isn't furry shit on a /v/ board by default.

>>16658860

You’re not fooling anyone samefag

>>16658798

>remember the "please don't do that" post by iwata when they showed him a picture of mario and luigi kissing.

Wasn't that a parody account?

>>16658843

>hates anime

>hates furries

>muh degeneracy

Keep on LARPing /pol/-kun, maybe someday the day of the rope will come.

>>16658866

>You know soy doesn't turn you into a woman right? Ingesting soy in extremely amounts wouldn't even do shit as long as you work out and do shit.

Except that's fucking wrong:

http://archive.fo/7iYeO

>>16658875

I can't be fucked to read that but I'll assume you're right and still not give a fuck. Fuck you I like chocolate.

>>16658875

>fucker drinks 3 quarts of soy milk every day

>and has tofu dinners every day

<gee doc I’m feeling a little strange

No shit.

>>16658881

yeah, I just read through and whatever the fuck this dude did was way beyond what the anon was talking about. Nigger grew fucking TITS. Having an oreo isn't going to give you tits.

>>16658884

No, don't even try that. You, you exclusively have always been hated.

More than weebs.

More than trekkies and Star Wars fans.

More than D&D players and LARPers.

You have always been the absolute worst, the bottom of the barrel, and only in recent years have groups like Bronies appeared that are more universally reviled than you and your kind.

Don't even try to pretend like anyone else is on par with how much disdain there is for furfag filth.

>>16658891

The thing is, nearly everything has at least trace amounts soy in it

it's not as simple as having a single oreo and then avoiding soy for a while

while you're likely not going to develop gynecomastia, you certainly might have ypur mood altered.

>>16658896

Show me where the furry touched you

>>16658891

>Among other worrisome findings, he discovered significant shrinkage of the thymus gland, a key part of the immune system. “The thymus,” says Cooke, “is like a finishing school for white blood cells—it’s where they go to mature.”

>Whether the same effect occurs in human infants is difficult to say, but a 2001 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association surveyed over 800 adults, ages 20 to 34, who were fed either soy-based or cow’s-milk formulas during their infancy.

>One of the few differences to emerge was that the group raised on soy formula regularly used more asthma and allergy medications in adulthood. Was this just a quirk of the sampling—or could it represent a subtle impairment of immune function?

>“I don’t know the answer,” says Cooke. “But the point is I don’t think anyone knows. There are 20 million people in the United States alone who have consumed soy formula as infants. When people ask me about doing experiments, I tell them we already are—with a large chunk of the country’s population.”

>For now, at least, the United States is gambling that widespread use of soy formula won’t lead to long-term consequences.

>In 2005, Israel’s health ministry recommended that soy products be limited in young children and, if possible, avoided altogether in infants. In issuing such a caution, Israel joined France, New Zealand, and Australia in officially embracing a better-safe-than-sorry approach for the next generation.

>…

>In a 2005 study in the Journal of Nutrition, researchers comparing soy to casein concluded that “the biological value of soy protein must be considered inferior to that of casein protein in humans.”

>Among other disadvantages, the researchers found, a significantly larger portion of soy is degraded to the waste product urea. Moreover, it contributes to less protein synthesis in the body.

>…

>In a Harvard study published last year in the journal Human Reproduction, Jorge E. Chavarro, M.D., Sc.D., and his colleagues found a strong association between men’s consumption of soy foods and decreased sperm counts.

>Ninety-nine men reported their intake of 15 different soy-based foods, then underwent semen analysis. Those in the highest category of daily soy intake averaged 32 percent fewer sperm per milliliter of ejaculate than those who went sans soy.

>…

>If shooting blanks is worrisome, how about being unable to shoot at all? Two other recently published papers reveal that at least one soy component clearly impairs erectile function in animals—and may do so in men as well.

>…

>Moderate doses of the phyto-estrogen administered either in youth or adulthood significantly affected the quality of their erections. Among other changes, the daidzein-exposed males produced less testosterone, had softer erections, and experienced biochemical changes to their penile tissues that left these tissues less elastic and less capable of complete blood engorgement.

>…

>Last summer, Eef Hogervorst, Ph.D., of England’s Loughborough University, and other researchers published a study on soy products and dementia risk.

>The researchers focused their attention on older Indonesians, members of a culture in which tofu has long been a dietary staple. Hogervorst says her team began the study confident of finding a benefit from tofu’s phytoestrogens.

>“Almost everything we’d learned from animal and cell-culture work indicated that estrogenlike compounds protect the brain,” she says.

>In older men and older women alike, however, they found exactly the opposite indication: Participants over age 68 who were regularly eating the most tofu had double the risk of dementia and memory impairment as those consuming a more moderate amount.

>…

>Still, his experiences have taught him that the foods we eat are not always what we think they are. Soy protein today is an ubiquitous, profitable, and often buried ingredient in a bewildering number of packaged foods. More than most people, Price was doing his best to avoid it. But he was still tripped up.

>“In today’s supermarkets,” he says, his voice weary, “you can’t hardly get anything without at least some soy in it.”

<Absolute nothing to worry about unless you want to start developing the feminine form, become sterile, no longer be erect, consume literal waste, and start suffering from mental illness.

I swear this thread is getting derailed by nintendrones

>>16658902

Don't really give a shit, I'm not one to watch what I eat.

>>16658915

not reading that shit nigger

>>16658949

what you gonna do about it faggot?

>>16658955

>every furfag is kero

I like the file name though

>>16658958

Yes, they are.

>>16658958

Isn't that the opposite of what he's saying, or is he bad at formatting

>>16658903

I saw Angel Cop a month or so ago. The webm made from it was probably the most interesting part of that anime by far and that was the B plot, the A plot was about a bunch of psykers being fags because their leader is a bitch. After the events of the webm the guy triggers a bomb in the evil guys' helicopter, they die, then a text crawl basically said "everything went back to normal".

>>16658962

>>16658966

>t. furshitter

You're still butthurt about being banned from monster?

>>16658969

I haven't even posted there.

>>16658976

Oh but they have to be transsexuals who cut off their dicks, I posted a picture of some random fuck who did that and is also a weeaboo. I win.

>>16658611

>wherever I go, I must also flaunt my sexuality

Admit it. You're sad you aren't there, in a fursuit, wearing a Nintendo marketing shirt.

>>16658983

No, just when I BTFO faggots like you :^)

>>16658698

It also doesn't help that it's goobergrape/skeptics central in the comments section.

>>16658981

why would I want to do that? I just like cute anime bitches who also happen to be furbased. Conventions and wearing actual unironic furry suits is just weird. I stick to virtual shit my friend.

>>wherever I go, I must also flaunt my sexuality

wat

>>16658994

Well which are you?

>>16658814

Is this bait?

>>16658997

Nah, the CIA's only into MLP which Isn't The Same Thing As Furry™

>>16658559

>>16658628

go back to 4chan

>>16659011

Why do those drag queens look like anime villains?

>>16659024

Then how are you posting?

>>16659028

Psychic computers

>>16659022

It was meant to be a warning of the future anon, no one listened.

WPWYF?

>>16658960

And every lolicon is quzilax a geiger counter rapist. :^)

>>16659086

Gaaaaay

>>16659111

Begone homo.

>>16659124

That's not a Machoke.

What is the deal with cuckchan calling everyone else cuckchanners when they say their precious snowflake games are shit? I want something done about this!

>>16659138

Why are more and more people using unironic exclamatory puncuation lately? It feels like the site is being flooded by twitterfags.

>>16659147

If it was flooded our UISP count would not be at its lowest yet…

>>16658539

>faggots

>dog

oh no no no

>>16659077

>WPWYF

All of them.

I don't remember the name but it's a form of fox, humanoid-ish not feral

>>16659166

That's the one, there's another but again my memory fails me.

>>16658563

Sauce?

>>16659169

yes

>>16659174

First one's a dude and so is the second one probably.

>>16659178

Vulpix I think that's the name is cute but no not that one. It's not feral. I'll remember eventually.

>>16659186

Maybe I would if the site would load images and videos. MAYBE

>>16658615

He might sperg about it but he is not wrong.

>>16659210

Delet this

>>16658544

jesus what a terrible photoshop

somebody post the original, I'll make a better one

>>16659131

Quite the silly thing you did there.

>>16659252

RIP in Poop

>>16658712

Who let leftypol out?

>>16659230

Spergs are detrimental to your side

Did you really expect anything else after that faggot from (((EA))) just took over NoA? My guess, Nintendo stock is going to be crashing hard. All they have going for them is that they are traditional kid friendly gaming. Well, no longer.

>>16658651

>4th pic

Where has that apple been?

>>16659302

Now that's delusional

>>16659303

Actually it's a wumpa fruit and it's been up her wumpa fruit

>>16659307

>pozzed CEO from that cancer that is (((EA))) hops over to Nintendo

>somehow no expecting more pozz

Now that's delusional.

It's only a matter of time before Link is officially trans and Mario and Luigi come out as husbands instead of brothers.

>>16658589

Because we stopped gassing them for being fags.

>>16659326

what the fuck

>>16659352

>>16659350

What was it?

>>16659362

So should we give up the fight bros? Literally nobody will ever side with us ever again.

>>16659359

The average furry.

>>16659359

down syndrome drag queens on a BBC show

>>16659092

>(7)

Hey anon i don't watch cuckime but you sound like just another resetera faggot to me :^)

>>16659380

>In minecraft, of course

What the fuck are you going on about? Also don't give niggerpill (you)s.

>>16659387

>just ignore the truth bro

EA is now in control of Nintendo and there's nothing you can do about it. Link will (((transition))) in BotW2 and Zelda will have a stronk disabled womyn of color gf

Welp time for the furfags to sperg out again.

>>16658970

Whats the name of the artist of the song?

>>16659392

The furfags already left anon. They haven't posted here in a while

>>16659395

Bon Jovi

>>16658539

That dog's asshole is probably prolapsing now.

Notice all the (((1))) posts coming in?

>>16659192

Zoroark you retard

>>16659400

Checked

Thank You.

>>16659410

We lack a Hitler to rally behind.

>>16659402

It's just niggerpill as usual, ignore him. Wouldn't be surprised at all if niggerpill turned out to be Aaron.

>>16659384

>>16659388

>>16658849

Is this some failed Pedoera posting?

>>16659422

>Wouldn't be surprised at all if niggerpill turned out to be Aaron.

Aren't they confirmed to be the same person?

>>16659352

Pray for Mt.Rainier and the Cascade Mountains to erupt to bring fiery Sodom and Gomorrah judgement upon the faggots.

>>16659392

>furfags are sperging out

I dunno, it looks more like furfags casually post images in a shitty console wars thread and mr. (28) loses his shit

>The furries are the worst part of this

Furries are the worst part of everything they're in.

>>16659494

I think you mean best

>>16658538

>the vidya industry is completely pozzed and you shouldn't give them a cent

Already on it.

>>16659422

>>16659436

>AARON

Holy shit I forgot about that stupid fucking idiot. Jesus christ. Someone has the screencaps right? Please?

>>16659490

Do it

>>16659507

Lulziest, sure. But worst in every other way.

>>16659668

>breeding with a rabbit

Better keep the kids away from her, else they get eaten.

>>16658732

>And honestly, OAG is on par with Kotaku in terms of journalistic quality

Kotaku never admits when they're wrong.

>>16659693

What if you're into that kind of thing?

>>16659693

Wouldn't they only do that if they're starving?

>>16659700

Carry on then.

>>16659703

Probably, I only chose the most egregious example. Rabbits generally make terrible mothers.

>>16659693

well, rabbits are prey. either way they will get eaten.

>>16659709

>Rabbits generally make terrible mothers.

Well hopefully that wouldn't be the case with a kemono bun.

Every time I see someone in a fursuit I have a primal urge to chimp out, curbstomp them, beat them with a chain wrapped baseball bat etc…

>>16659414

What is pewdiepie then?

>>16659417

>t. leftypol

>>16658712

okay retard.

>>16658635

the newest pokemon disgust me and even lewds can't save that

>>16659914

psst hey

>>16658615

>OAG is a blog owned by one big sperg followed by a community of autists

At least you can still call people niggerfaggots over there

>>16658615

Do you even know who Kungfuman is? He's not wrong at all. He's been doing the concern trolling shtick for 5 years straight. And when the truth was revealed about Mortal Kombat 11 (the devs themselves admitting that they were toning down the designs) him and his ilk pretended to be outraged at Noob and against the SJW pandering despite them earlier trying hard to defend it and never admitted they were in the wrong all because OAG was the first to point out what everyone already knew since the MKX days.

And besides, until I see the outrage of having threads here made on mere Kotaku articles (which has been happening more and more recently with no butthurt) then I'm not going to give a damn about threads made on OAG articles or any other place as long as it's archived.

>>16659933

I think mark might be the least ugly looking jew i've ever seen

>>16659934

Kungfucuck

Who cares, this corporate wokeness™ is done by almost everyone nowadays.

>>16660108

The time is completely fucking meaningless. Pay attention to what I said.

>>16660180

>just stop caring about genocide

>>16660201

If you only care about the politics of it, go to /pol/.

>>16660202

Quit being a stupid fucking nigger and realize that if you don't care about the politics of games it will eventually get to the games you DO care about and it will change them for the worse.

>>16658538

>(((Nintendo))) really are lost

Billion dollar companies aren't your friend. They associate with the faggot community for PR and cash. If these rainbow wearing cock suckers have cash to blow then you bet your ass that companies are going to pander.

t. faggot that makes money off of gays

>>16660292

(((they))) threatened them or if not they will give the console war win to sony or microsoft whoever cucks the most

video games are dead

will you hold onto this hobby until the industry crashes and is reborn again?

>>16658834

I thought furry died from spam and fur was replacement?

Either way theyre trash. People there unironically defend cub art and dogfucking

>>16658538

Nintendo just came out against censorship, idk if Bowser himself fucks a fox at the parade.

Sony sux and xbonex sucks even more than a fuckin parade, anon.

>>16660645

>it's just furry loli

leaving aside the disgusting furry shit for a second, no, it's furry toddlercon and frequently combines scat and/or diaper bullshit with it

See one thing is attending a fagfest I mean even fucking Tony Abbott has done that

The other is sanctioning furries

>>16660807

>someone fucked a guy's dog while he was out

>>16660825

What the hell.

>>16660035

>30 minute ban

>spergs out about it

holy fuck you are pathetic

>>16660807

>>16660785

Daily reminder that these are the kind of people that post Pokeporn in the Pokemon threads.

>>16660807

Furfaggot hate thread?

Furfaggot hate thread.

>>16660889

(You)

>>16660894

>eating an animal is the same as fucking them

Why do animal fuckers always use that argument

>>16660894

I'd like to ask this again, has any vegan taken care of a farm animal, or worked as a butcher, or are they type of people who sees a post on facebook about how like Mcdonalds does this or that and assumes every butcher and piece of meat is the product of a life of suffering?

>>16658712

>toxic

>defending furries

You've ousted yourself, degenerate. Now get the fuck out.

>>16658538

SHAMEFUL DISPLAY!

>>16660914

>has any vegan taken care of a farm animal, or worked as a butcher

leftists don't work anon. that's why the support socialism. Socialism doesn't work, and neither do they.

>>16660909

>Loving romantic sexual relationship with a dog

>Defending kero

Ah yes, because torturing and killing a dog is definitely "romantic". These people are batshit insane.

>>16660937

Oh, vegans are automatically leftists? That explains it.

>>16660948

>Rainworld avatar

FUCK OFF

>>16660956

The guy in the video most likely is, as he also supports universal income or whatever it's called. I'm sure everyone is shocked to find out a man who has chosen to make YouTube his career is in favor of getting a state salary for not working.

>>16660956

There would be massive cognitive dissonance if vegans were anything but leftist. Contrast this with some vegetarians, who eat such a diet out of principle but know that some form of animal products are needed, or because they have a medical condition.

>>16660966

Universal basic income. In theory I think it's an idealized dream but I live in a third world country so what do I know.

Also I recognize that nasily fuck, he's the guy who can repeat a criticism for a movie for over 20 minutes or more and upload it as a review.

>>16660914

Yeah, they always point to the worst shit because shockvalue works, but are to assed to understand that you have farmers that do take good care of their cattle and don't pump them full of shit and what have you. Sure if you live in a big city you don't have too many options to buy directly from farmers.

>>16660956

>Oh, vegans are automatically leftists? That explains it.

Anon didn't say that, but there a huge probability that a vegan is also a leftist.

>>16660202

Shut up and get out.

>>16660874

See: >>16660200

Fuck off if you can’t talk about the topic.

Say goys, where is the tel aviv pride parade?

>>16661261

Careful goy, you can joke about Nintendo being faggots but you can't talk about Nintendo and Israel.

>>16660909

>all furries are zoophiles

Straight from the wolf's mouth, folks.

>nintendo the only vidya company not to censor games

<instead of titties games show hardcore benis and gay

>>16658875

>He told me, ‘Probably about 3 quarts,’” recalls Dr. Lewi about the moment that changed everything.

Yeah that's not normal at all. 3 quarts is 96 ounces, so he was consuming around that much. That's drinking it like water. It would probably be wise to just approach soy like liver: eat too much and get sick. I don't see how this case prevents the occasional mapo tofu or miso soup, just like I wouldn't stop eating the occasional chopped liver or fried chicken liver.

>>16661491

>not to censor

You clearly know nothing about translations.

>>16660970

It’s called communism. It does not work.

>>16658538

Don't forget that Jewtendo now operates in Pissrael:

https://archive.fo/MboQi

>>16662017

>first pic

Is there an edit of that with Sonic spin attacking the kid?

>>16660970

Alright, Universal Basic Income doesn't work for the following reasons:

1. Pricing of all goods is decided by what people are willing to pay

2. If people have more money, they will spend more money

3. therefore, giving someone 1000 extra dollars every month increases the bar for pricing and prices will increase.

Next problem:

1. Handing out income through the government means that they have to print more bills or they lose their entire budget

2. Printing more bills devalues currency

3. When you hand out 1000 dollars to 327.2 million people, you will pay 3,272,000,000 each month.

3 billion each month.

>>16663845

Someone didn't take economics.

>pricing of all goods is decided by what people are willing to pay

not even close. ignoring the differences between essential and luxury products, and ignoring that cost of production also drives sale price, you could only get away with charging a premium for a product if there is no competition in the market. the keyword here is *willing*. people are not willing to pay more for the same product for no reason. if mcdonalds increases the price of their hamburgers because they think people will be more willing to spend more since they have more disposable income, burger king will simply capitalize on the disparity to increase their own sales. there's more at work here, capitalism doesn't just immediately fall apart simply because people have more than 0 starting income.

>physically printing money creates inflation

that's not how inflation works

>giving people money costs money

no shit, everything costs money. on a governmental level, you pay for UBI the same way you pay for anything, you budget for it. UBI could easily be paid for by simply reworking the tax system to more fairly target major corporations and the incredibly rich, while also cutting funding for programs no longer needed with UBI and optionally cutting military spending (which is way out of control in the first place).

here's some articles to educate yourself with:

https://medium.com/basic-income/the-cost-of-universal-basic-income-is-the-net-transfer-amount-not-the-gross-price-tag-acb8aa5eab73

https://medium.com/economicsecproj/how-to-reform-welfare-and-taxes-to-provide-every-american-citizen-with-a-basic-income-bc67d3f4c2b8

>>16663903

>Someone didn't take economics.

>basic economics don't apply to essential products!

>educate yourself lolol

<believes DUH ONE PERCENT has enough money to pay for UBI

<believes in UBI at all

I refuse to believe anyone is legitimately this retarded.

>>16663903

>UBI could easily be paid for by simply reworking the tax system to more fairly target major corporations and the incredibly rich

>hey, where you guys going? Someone has to pay for all this!

If the average Jew in America can flee to Israel from pedophilia and murder charges then millionaires will likely find zero issue in hightailing it to the Bahamas or wherever.

Besides, if you cut taxes for the lower and middle class you accomplish the same goal but without rewarding sloth. And as you said, by fixing the bloated military spending we can afford it.

>>16663911

What you're espousing isn't "basic economics", and the fact that you think it is only gives credence to the fact that you don't know economics.

>>16663930

>>16663933

>businesses will leave if you increase taxes!

This is a myth with zero evidence to support it. The exceedingly wealthy do *rarely* move their physical homes from one state to another to avoid *state* taxes, but moving an entire business is another story, especially when you're talking about moving to a different country. Raising the effective tax rate of the exceedingly wealthy by a few percentage points is not going make people flee the country, and it literally never has in the past in the US. Not to mention that even if you do leave a country, it doesn't make you free from tax obligation so long as you still operate business within that country. The actual more likely thing to happen is that the exceedingly wealthy will make more of an effort to evade taxes, but closing tax evasion loopholes is important regardless of whether or not you're for or against increased taxes.

Going even further, cutting taxes on the wealthy at a federal level literally costs the US government trillions of dollars in income. Why aren't you concerned about that lost income and how it impacts the health of the country? There's far more at play here than simplistic fear-mongering talking points can account for.

You clearly didn't even click the links though. If you had, you'd see that there are real actual numbers in the second one that give just one example of tax reforms that would completely cover the cost of UBI. It's a completely workable and realistic system, no matter how hard you cry to the contrary in fear of progress.

This is /v/. Why are we talking about UBI?

>>16664050

>zero evidence to support it.

Yes, because no company has ever moved their production to a developing country to shave costs.

>>16660807

>>16660825

These are just fapfics?… Right?

>>16664120

That doggo looks depressed.

>>16663903

>>16664050

The 1% already pay for well over 99% of your welfare check to keep your useless existence alive, and even if you taxed them 100% (and for some reason they magically regained their income every year and didn't live the country) you still wouldn't even come remotely close to being able to sustain UBI.

You don't even have an elementary schooler's grasp on economics. You're an intellectual midget- trying to "debate" like this isn't really your strong point. You might as well just embrace being a parasite, throw up some Facebook or NEET memes and call it a day.

>>16664713

You couldn't have more baseless nonsense in a single post if you were actually trying. Hate to break it to you, but I work full-time and I'm not on any government assistance programs. Also, the top 1% making up the largest chunk of total tax revenue is literally how a progressive tax system is designed to work. The richer you are, the higher your effective tax rate is supposed to be, to make it so that you contribute your fair share of your income earned back into the country you live in. If you had stepped out of your echo-chamber and actually read the article I linked earlier, or literally any other of dozens of articles explaining how to pay for UBI, you'd see that paying for (and sustaining) UBI is completely doable, or at least you'd be able to argue on more than just ad-hominem, but I'm not holding out hope on some tard that doesn't even understand basic math, let alone economic theory and policy.

>>16664971

I'm really trying to pull a coherent argument out of this but I don't think there is one. I'll try to respond anyway though, for the sake of trying.

>UBI isn't a bid to help people in the lower class, it's a bid to fuck people over in the middle and upper class

What kind of UBI are you basing this assertion on? Nearly every economic model of UBI necessitates that you make literally more than 6 figures a year for the taxation to overtake the increased income, and the people that make that much can afford a very slight loss in net income. These are people who are solidly in the "upper class" and above, not in the "middle class" and definitely not the "lower class", where UBI makes the impact it's supposed to make.

>it's a barrier for economic mobility

It's literally the opposite of a barrier for economic mobility. It "takes money to make money", you need surplus income in order to start building towards a higher economic status. Currently this can only be accomplished in the lower and middle class through going into debt, with the hope to earn more than you invest and eventually pay off the debt. Unless you get exceedingly lucky though, you typically just end up spending most of your life in debt with very little overall change in your economic status or quality of life. A net gain of ~$10,000 a year for the lower and middle class gives new opportunity to build towards a higher economic status without taking on new risk, making it so that you can *actually* take a step into the next economic bracket if you use the money wisely.

>The highest of the high will never pay

Like I said, closing tax evasion loopholes is important regardless of whether or not you're in favor of increased taxes. This is fearmongering.

>anyone lower then that will face a financial rubber band difficulty to reach wealth, so no one will break into the upper class

The difficulty of transitioning from "rich" to "filthy rich" has essentially nothing to do with taxes. The difficulty of transitioning from poor to middle class, or from middle class to rich also has almost nothing to do with taxes. You're gonna have to elaborate on how you came to the conclusion that a net gain of income per year for poor and middle class creates a barrier of entry into the next economic bracket.

>the extra taxes work on increasing percentage rather then a flat percetage

I literally cannot decipher what this means or what it's in reference to.

>It's implementing a difficulty curve to becoming rich and flat out making it impossible to break past the middle or even the poor class in the future, with additional consequences of making everyone poor, slowly and increasing the gap between workers and owners.

>Universal Basic Income is the first step to modern slavery.

Whatever fantasy world you've constructed in your head for this to make sense is baffling. The system we live under *right now* already makes it almost impossible to increase economic status. We are *already* effectively "slaves" to the rich, or the "owners", or whatever term you want to use. Again, giving a net gain of income to the majority of the population quite literally closes the gap between the rich and the poor, it would do the opposite of what you're saying it would do.