[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / dempart / doomer / general / lewd / vichan / vril / wmafsex ]

/v/ - Video Games

Vidya Gaems
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<BOARD RULES>
[ /agdg/ | Vidya Porn | Hentai Games | Retro Vidya | Contact ]

File: 250dcd135fa2b76⋯.jpg (254.31 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 20190425230108_1.jpg)

b46043  No.16411048

I just got done playing Call of juarez and I really liked it. The Reverend going on his little crusade through the wild west was great and then billy sneaking around bandits and renegade Apaches was pretty cool. Then I played CoJ:gunslinger and to be honest it annoys me, the whole levelling stuff is just unnecessary. The gun play is good though.

I have heard bound in blood was good should I bother with it?

8939a9  No.16411089

File: fb2e89efe86c76d⋯.jpg (211.11 KB, 1938x1224, 19:12, fb2e89efe86c76d13fd31c44c3….jpg)

>>16411048

I only ever played Bound in Blood but I really enjoyed it. It had a cool system where you would auto-lean when approaching the edges of cover, you get to choose between playing as the burly guy that becomes the reverend or his brother (Billy's dad) who can lasso grapple to places, they also are each more proficient with certain weapons giving it a bit of replayability, I think you also have decisions that slightly affect the story. What I really liked was that at a few points in the game you have levels that are kind of open-world. You'll be near a shop where you can take bounties and buy weapons (weapons come in quality from worst which look rusty to best which are gold), then you can mount your horse and explore around doing objectives to earn cash and looking for chests and better guns.

Overall I'd recommend it, though I will say the start is a bit rough. The multiplayer is probably dead though so it likely is not worth buying a copy, especially considering all the things I've read about the last full entry in the series, your money is with little doubt going to fund a departure from the western roots of the series. Also one weird thing is that there is no melee except for picking up chairs you find around the environment to break over targets for a one hit kill.


afb6eb  No.16411099

Even by Current Year standards, Bound in Bound is extremely anti-white. You have 2 white guys lusting over a brown spic girl, the Reverend gets cucked by his brother, the "plot" has them leave the rayciss Confederate army, and the ebil rayciss General somehow becomes the final boss. He shows up out of nowhere, gives a whole spiel on why miscegenation is bad, and you then you kill him "cuz raycisum bad".

Is it a better game than CoJ1? Yes, by a longshot. It doesn't have shitty stealth sections for starters. Should you play it? No. The only relatively unpozzed game this series has produced is Gunslinger.


b46043  No.16411180

>>16411128

I like that too with gunslinger, its pretty clever.

>>16411089

well I am definitely not buying it since ubisoft is still publishing it. but that is what piracy is for.


000000  No.16411230

>>16411048

This >>16411099

The first game has a half-bred abomination as the main character.

They are all mediocre at best, and full of marxist propaganda. Not worth any time or money.


cf5092  No.16411242

>>16411230

Halfbreed goblins need to be hung.


b46043  No.16411310

File: 04831febac6790c⋯.jpg (23.67 KB, 290x492, 145:246, Mamma_mia_.jpg)

File: c14da9436f6952a⋯.jpg (53.15 KB, 609x609, 1:1, mexico.jpg)

>>16411230

>half-bred abomination

believe it or not he is actually fully mexican he was already in the womb when his mother fled with Mccall.

Also there is nothing wrong with wanting some Latina ass.


afb6eb  No.16411368

File: 5155dacde406eeb⋯.gif (459.72 KB, 500x234, 250:117, hand-over-the-tacos.gif)

File: 68036359c736441⋯.gif (465.22 KB, 500x234, 250:117, SeñorLinko.gif)

>>16411310

>raised his wife's son

How cucked can one man get


b46043  No.16411427

>>16411368

does it make it any better if he beat his wifes son for most of his life?


b46043  No.16411505

File: bac16fd274fb073⋯.jpg (418.14 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 20190425182342_1.jpg)

File: b169274eb500e58⋯.jpg (401.34 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 20190425013305_1.jpg)

File: 634f17c8c24aaa4⋯.jpg (363.46 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 20190425013830_1.jpg)

File: d333a05493e3b79⋯.jpg (348.38 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 20190425014031_1.jpg)

File: 9811cdeaa1a0570⋯.jpg (482.84 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 20190425015804_1.jpg)

Something i do absolutely love about the first game though is the collectible bounty posters around which are just the devs.


b46043  No.16412062

File: 52105194f474df3⋯.jpg (44.78 KB, 720x720, 1:1, big iron.jpg)

>>16411099

>the "plot" has them leave the rayciss Confederate army

I actually bothered to download the game and they didn't leave the army because it was racist, they left because they wanted to protect their family and farm. I dont think they even mentioned race yet. Granted there might be some "racism bad" stuff later but so far i am not seeing it.


e577ab  No.16412302

>>16411310

>no tits

>nigger tier bottom

I'd rather fuck a man.


4851e2  No.16412367

>>16412062

IIRC them fighting the confederates at the end has nothing really to do with race shit, and is more about the big vault of aztec gold that the spic chick knows about. They want it to keep the war going, the protags want it to rebuild the farm and retire.


227a6a  No.16413132

>>16412062

The only real 'racism bad' and 'confederacy bad' shit comes from Colonel Barnsby's rants. The only reason you fight the ex-confederates is because Barnsby wants the gold to rebuild the Confederacy and he wants revenge against the brothers for being deserters, and even then the brothers themselves are completely unapologetic about fighting for the Confederacy.


46ba46  No.16413659

File: 4c150ae261bb221⋯.jpg (789.37 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, d5be4c4168a494ccf8a1842553….jpg)

>>16412302

You're an idiot.


19f77b  No.16413929

File: 8dfeff89baebe72⋯.jpg (1.54 MB, 1080x1350, 4:5, faec958bc483cc77154b8d8f7.jpg)

>>16412302

>I'd rather fuck a man.

titcows everyone


fc28b8  No.16413944

>3dpd

back to cuckchan


98796d  No.16413954

File: 36de4cef46cde61⋯.webm (15.97 MB, 800x448, 25:14, 2018-05-31 02-09-44.webm)

Gunslinger was a barrel of laughs and I love the fact it even exists. I've never played any other CoH that's a third game with these initials, but I know it's a bit of a departure from the norm.


b46043  No.16418581

Something that I have been wondering about is the first level of Bound in blood which looked like it was WW1. Is that accurate? I saw a video where a guy called the american civil war a prelude to the world war and i am wondering how true that is.

Is there any Americans who can confirm this or am I just rambling?


64adf0  No.16418942

>>16413944

>Muh cuckime

Yikes!


a40401  No.16418979

>>16411048

I only played Gunslinger and aside from some FoV fixes you probably want the game was a although rather short bundle of fun.

Wish they had done more for replay value.


2ceb90  No.16419050

>>16411048

the only good thing about bound in bland was the multiplayer, the sticky Firstperson cover system was kind of good and kinda wonder why its not in other ubishit like far cry


2ceb90  No.16419057

>>16412062

….are you retarded? the mccalls ran a plantation


2522be  No.16419065

>>16413954

Gunslinger was so fun.


b46043  No.16419106

File: b28babaa13b7dbf⋯.png (765.02 KB, 1278x720, 71:40, Confusion.png)

>>16419057

They did? I thought it was a farm and not a plantation. They did mention their neighbor having slaves but they never showed any. Granted I probably am retarded and completely missed the bit of dialogue where they mention that stuff.


7cd439  No.16419668

Bound in Blood is mediocre shit

It's like FarCry 2 if FarCry 2 had connections to the previous game.


536e8d  No.16419911

I really wanted to like the first game, but there was alot of little weird things that bothered me. Like how the controls for the showdowns so it's more obnoxious. Like, instead of just pressing z or 1 to reach for a pistol and fire they have it so you have to move your mouse down to your waist, like it wants you to feel like you're actually reaching for your gun, and because of that it has to activate that fucking bullet time. Didn't bother with Bound in Blood or gunslinger, but the Cartel wasn't especially good. Like, it was rushed out the door for Ubisoft, and you can feel it, hell, it's probably why Gunslinger exists in the first place. the best thing about Cartel is the playable glow in the dark FBI nigger and mexican get sent to jail in the best ending


c0566d  No.16419921

>>16411048

>Call of Juarez

So is this just a Mexican Army themed FPS?


536e8d  No.16419962

>>16419921

>So is this just a Mexican Army themed FPS?

Nope, it's a video game western, only you play as both the cowboy and injun.


b46043  No.16420282

>>16419911

>Like how the controls for the showdowns so it's more obnoxious.

I actually really liked that, the only time I had a problem with it was at the very end when you kill the spics dad. I liked it every other time though.


eb075c  No.16420976

Was GUN any good?

I remember wanting it like 15 years ago.


b46043  No.16422110

>>16420976

I heard it was pretty good, never played it myself though.


2522be  No.16430323

File: 63f13be38441e08⋯.png (380.19 KB, 601x571, 601:571, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 36440dfd3c8a4e1⋯.mp4 (6.91 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, kUmR8TdAmOzPvdaq.mp4)

Oh shit we might be getting Gunslinger 2


a40401  No.16431540

>>16430323

Here is hoping it turns out to be another fun ride


5cc5d2  No.16434030

>>16418581

I just watched the first level, yeah it's accurate enough, nothing more than a trench under artillery fire. Artillery cut down a lot of guys in the Civil War, and the yankees had a big advantage in average artillery technology so Confederate forces would be bombarded from a position outside the range of their own older guns. Military Historians generally agree that the Civil War was the first "modern" war, eclipsing the Napoleonic concept of the "nation under arms" and introducing the "nation at war" or "total war", since the U.S. Civil War was one of the first, if not the very first, war in which the economic and industrial capabilities of both nations were fully utilized in support of the war effort, an effect of the Industrial Revolution. A lot of European generals looked at the Franco-Prussian war for lessons to learn and kind of slighted the lessons of the American Civil War, and as a result they weren't prepared for the absolute chaotic mess that WW1 was going to be, but of course the Civil War lacked plenty of the new surprises that would catch them off guard.

Trench warfare in the civil war wasn't as utilized as WW1 though, comparatively speaking it was very limited, so don't imagine the civil war as this 24/7 trenchfoot kind of deal, you were more likely to be marching than entrenched regardless of which side you were on.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / dempart / doomer / general / lewd / vichan / vril / wmafsex ]