[–]▶ No.816793>>816803 >>816809 >>816840 >>816891 >>817058 >>817172 >>817616 >>817698 >>817981 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
>Facebook is testing new technology that is designed to help victims of revenge porn acts. It works on a database of file hashes, a cryptographic signature computed for each file. Facebook says that once an abuser tries to upload an image marked as "revenge porn" in its database, its system will block the upload process. This will work for images shared on the main Facebook service, but also for images shared privately via Messenger, Facebook's IM app. The weird thing is that in order to build a database of "revenge porn" file hashes, Facebook will rely on potential victims uploading a copy of the nude photo in advance. This process involves the victim sending a copy of the nude photo to his own account, via Facebook Messenger. This implies uploading a copy of the nude photo on Facebook Messenger, the very same act the victim is trying to prevent. The victim can then report the photo to Facebook, which will create a hash of the image that the social network will use to block further uploads of the same photo.
That's a nice fucking bait. Kudos Facebook you perv.
▶ No.816795
Zuckerberg had a dream, to see all the nudes in the world.
They claim they do not store the photo, but just use a hash of it... yet they don't do this on the client side.
▶ No.816803>>816804 >>816818 >>817088 >>817172
>>816793 (OP)
this is retarded as fuck, not unlike anything that this kike zuckerstein ever touches.
All one would have to do is simply change a few bytes of the picture that's banned and the resulting hash would be totally different. Unless they use some really fucking smart A.I that basically compare pictures at an incredible rate i don't see this being effective.
▶ No.816804>>816807 >>816810
>>816803
They say they're not storing the picture though, so it's a straight hash.
▶ No.816807>>816814 >>817088
>>816804
how do you think they get the hash?
▶ No.816809>>816815 >>817088
>>816793 (OP)
What happens if you upload a random image, can no one else use it. Will they have to manually verify that it is a nude photo and that it is you?
What could go wrong?
▶ No.816810>>816814 >>817161
>>816804
>trusting zuckerberg
What a dumb fuck
▶ No.816814>>816818
>>816807
You don't need to save the image to compute the hash, it doesn't even need to be written to disk.
>>816810
You're a bit slow. Facebook make the claim that they do not retain the image, therefore if they later claim they can detect minor variations of the image, they're exposing themselves.
▶ No.816815
>>816809
Everything, it's completely retarded. I can't wait to see this abused.
▶ No.816817
They're probably using this:
http://www.phash.org
▶ No.816818
>>816814
>>816803
there is such a thing as perceptual hashes
▶ No.816819>>816823 >>816825 >>816896 >>816994 >>817108 >>819166
maybe don't take pictures of yourself naked and send them out to people
just a thought
▶ No.816823>>817599
>>816819
Sluts gonna slut.
▶ No.816825>>816856
>>816819
>what do you mean some russian drained your bank account? Just don't give out your credit card lol
enlightening
▶ No.816840>>816854 >>817088
>>816793 (OP)
>This will work for images shared on the main Facebook service, but also for images shared privately via Messenger, Facebook's IM app
https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/08/messenger-adds-end-to-end-encryption/
If it's end-to-end encrypted, and they aren't using client side hash detection, how would it detect censored pictures?
▶ No.816849
All I see here is another way to make money illegally using computers. But why can't I be putting my skills to good use? Because the people in charge of hiring are the ones who would use this kind of thing.
▶ No.816854>>817088
▶ No.816856
>>816825
>nudes are equivalent to bank accounts
▶ No.816891>>816897
>>816793 (OP)
>That's a nice fucking bait. Kudos Facebook you perv.
No, your bait is shit. For it to be good bait it would need to be remotely realistic.
▶ No.816896>>816918
>>816819
Good advice, but it's too late for any female under the age of 35. They all have noods, bj videos, etc.
▶ No.816897>>817077
▶ No.816918
>>816896
Lesson learned. I doubt they will send noods or let their sodomite boyfriends make bj videos.
▶ No.816938
>flood faceberg with every image on the internet
>faceberg can no longer post images
▶ No.816976>>816978
They must be very confident in their security measures. Imagine what would happen if some "disgruntled employee" released database of millions of nudes, or some "hacker". That is unless they really delete the pictures after making hashes.
▶ No.816978
>>816976
faceberg is cia/mossad op, they keep everything so they have ways to identify plebs
▶ No.816994>>816995 >>817122 >>817161 >>817189 >>819171 >>820361
>>816819
maybe stop slut shaming?
just a thought
▶ No.816995
>>816994
Kill yourself gnumale.
▶ No.817045
>muh revenge porn
>implying the pictures I take with my camera are property of anyone other than me
>implying I can't do what I want with my own property
>implying these dumb sluts don't have the opportunity to ensure ownership of these pictures themselves
>implying these dumb sluts don't have the opportunity to use contracts to enforce what can be done with the photos
Let's keep protecting retards from their own mistakes though
▶ No.817058
>>816793 (OP)
>Faceboob
Whore self-doxxing service.
It will be funny when someone eventually cracks their images and there is another fappening
Fappbook when?
TLAs have been doing this for years
▶ No.817073
▶ No.817074>>817088
If they're just storing hashes then it'll be easy to abuse it and ban every image that gets uploaded.
If they're not just storing hashes then they just risk another fappening.
Either way, we win.
▶ No.817075>>817077
>be dumb roastie
>let chad record you while you suck his dick
>pictures are never under your control as they are always on his phone
>chad dumps roastie for another roastie
>he uploads the pictures
>obviously there is no hash for them since dumb roastie never had access to the pictures in the first place
No matter how you look at this, it's retarded beyond belive but since OP never gave source it's probably just fake news anyways.
▶ No.817077>>817081
>>817075
see >>816897
I'm still not sure how vaild this is
▶ No.817080>>817081
▶ No.817081
>>817077
>>817080
Well in that case my point still stands. If the "victim" never had access to the nudes then this system is useless.
▶ No.817083>>817085 >>817094 >>817132
How would /tech/ implement a system like this? Apart from making the logo of course..
▶ No.817085>>817087 >>817089
>>817083
dont design shit
who gives a fuck if some stupid slut has her nudes leaked?
▶ No.817087>>817112
>>817085
a lot of people do, in particular the slut. i think you ment to say that _you_ don't care.
i'm a slut and the only reason no one has leaked a picture of my hairy balls are that they are disgusting as fuck. if only people would look at my balls like they look at terrys... oh well. a man can dream. a man can dream.
▶ No.817088>>817161
>>817074
They could use the pictures to further train their AI. Data is the new oil and most people are giving it away for free.
>>816840
>>816854
oops :^) ==DELETE THIS==
>>816809
>>816807
>>816803
Facebook has the biggest database with pictures. They have trained neural networks which recognize what the image contains. Do you think it can be abused so easily? They'll probably use some AI to recognize if the picture contains nudes and then use some kind of perceptual hashing which cannot be bypassed as easily as swapping a few bytes.
▶ No.817089>>817090 >>817200
>>817085
It was an engineering question, not a moral one. This is /tech/ and engineering solutions should be what we are interested in... right?
▶ No.817090>>817101
>>817089
>hey /tech/ how would you do (((this)))
Do your own work shekelberg
▶ No.817094>>817101
▶ No.817101>>817104 >>817116
That's awesome.
>>817090 has no skills and tries to mask it with a reply that implies the tech is only useful for facebook and zuckerberg.
>>817094 makes a little more effort and look up a question on stackoverflow.
▶ No.817104
>>817101
>woman
>got her degree thanks to betas on the internet
not surprised tbh
▶ No.817108
>>816819
>expecting women to act like decent people with foresight
▶ No.817112
>>817087
>_you_
We have italics here you disgusting newfag.
▶ No.817116
>>817101
>implying I'm not the one who answered the SO question in the first place
▶ No.817122
>>816994
Stop encouraging degeneracy tumblrette, I'm totally cool with nudes between married couples but you fags are destroying society.
▶ No.817132
>>817083
Using perceptual hashes, and by automatically posting the image to /s/.
▶ No.817161
>>816994
Look at this faggot
>>817088 heil'd
>>816810
/thread
▶ No.817172
>>816793 (OP)
Seems like he might be sabotaging the work he's doing for Alphabet Soup atp. I hope that's what's happening here and that this isn't a strawman argument made only so the dumbshit normalfags will go for whatever he/the establishment is really trying to push, this seems too dumb to be real otherwise.
>>816803
This. The Fappening obviously taught them bugger-all.
▶ No.817189
>Pornhub: I bet you ₪10 you can't fill all your datacenters with OC porn.
>Faceberg: You're on.
>>816994
>maybe actions shouldn't have consequences?
Maybe you should kys.
▶ No.817200>>817457
>>817089
>It was an engineering question, not a moral one.
There is no engineering fix to moral problems.
The fix is education. If you take a digital photo of yourself then there is a risk it will get out. Send it to someone or put it on the (((cloud))) then the risk is multiplied 100x.
▶ No.817457>>817461 >>817465 >>817468
>>817200
if i want to take naked pictures of myself with my obama phone then i should be allowed to
▶ No.817461
>>817457
Maybe get a simple camera which doesn't have Facebook on it.
▶ No.817465
>>817457
No one is saying you shouldn't be allowed to. Just don't be surprised when it ends up on faceboob.
▶ No.817467
>This implies uploading a copy of the nude photo on Facebook Messenger
They can't do the hashing client side, because people would just abuse it to censor everything else.
They have to look at each picture to check if it's really a nude.
▶ No.817468
>>817457
People should be dependent of their individual selves for maintaining privacy and intimacy. People must not be dependent on large, soulless organizations for that purpose.
▶ No.817530
If I share a picture about me without copyright, I do it to please someone else. It doesn't matter whether it's nude or not. If people are happy to see my image, or some random person at the other end of the world masturbates to it, I don't really care.
I do care however if Facebook or any other agency collects for "just in case you become a terrorist we will use it against you" purpose.
▶ No.817597>>817607
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/41928848
Humans rather than algorithms will view the naked images voluntarily sent to Facebook in a scheme being trialled in Australia to combat revenge porn.
The BBC understands that members of Facebook's community operations team will look at the images in order to make a "fingerprint" of them to prevent them being uploaded again.
Facebook will notify the person once the photo has been "hashed'.
It will then be up to the sender to delete the image.
lolwut
▶ No.817599
>>816823
Speaks the truth..You should see the pictures of his whore mother. Damn her pussy looks like it was fucked by a elephant's dick
▶ No.817607
>>817597
>Revenge porn is a growing issue in Australia where studies suggest that one in five women aged 18-45 may have been victims.
>victimes
Yeah victims of their own stupidity
▶ No.817609>>817614
I wonder what would happen is Facebooks server got hacked
▶ No.817612
TLDR Hey guys here at cuckbook we have a revolutionary new tool that we have been using for the feds to locate cp for fucking years much revolutionary such wow cuckbook cutting edge
▶ No.817614
>>817609
>I wonder what would happen is Facebooks server got hacked
Their servers have been "hacked" ever since Facebook started participating in PRISM.
This is just a way for the NSA to get more n00ds.
▶ No.817616
>>816793 (OP)
This will work wonders and you know it
▶ No.817643>>817691
>all sorts of pictures can be spoofed as revenge porn denying their upload
sounds fun
▶ No.817691
▶ No.817698>>817749
>>816793 (OP)
Maybe we should just not let our daughters be sluts.
Captcha: nudwhz
▶ No.817749
>>817698
before the nsfnet became the 'internet' there were no sluts or whores on the web.
▶ No.817964>>817965
Even if they do this, people will just find a different website to do it. Zuck the Cuck acts like he owns the only website in the world with this shit.
▶ No.817965>>817975
>>817964
>Zuck the Cuck acts like he owns the only website in the world with this shit.
That's because if he does, the normies will believe it to be so. Normies already spend most of their internet time on faceberg as it is. He wants to make it all the time.
▶ No.817975>>817980
>>817965
I think you overestimate people's reliance on Facebook. Google/Youtube and Pornhub have to be nearly the same size, if not larger.
▶ No.817980
>>817975
>Literally, every day more than 2,000 porn videos are uploaded in Xvideos.
>No counting the others several sites.
Where the hell is all this porn coming from?
I do not even know how this is possible.
▶ No.817981
>>816793 (OP)
so many things wrong with this
>lol im gonna send some nudes to my bf but i don't trust him
>spend 10 minutes uploading them to goybook first
>bf later revenge porns her but finds out the images have been previously blocked on goybook
<that bitchhh she didnt trust me even back then, i knew it!1!!!!
>goybook gets hacked and database of 10 million pending images are leaked
>web JS solution hashes photo in JS and uploads the hash
>phone solution hashes photo client side and uploads the hash
>web JS solution had bug where it accidentally uploaded the photo, due to using some retarded web framework that just does whatever the fuck instead of what the developer had in mind
>phone solution had same bug because nowadays native apps are just webshit
>multiply these problems with the possibility that the vuln was intentionally introduced
<either way leads to government making more rules n sheeit to protect the poor goy
>authorities figure out hackers can bypass the system by uploading the revenge porn to rogue image hosters. new regulation passed only allows certain authorities to host images
inb4 "muh you're out of touch". no, with the way things are sliding, this can be realized within the next decade
▶ No.818012
Zuckerberg's lust for power truly knows no bounds.
▶ No.819151
https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/9/16630900/facebook-revenge-porn-defense-details
>Facebook today explained in more detail its new test for combating revenge porn following mass confusion earlier this week over how exactly the system works and whether it puts users at a higher risk for abuse. The system, currently being piloted in Australia in partnership with the country’s eSafety Commissioner, allows users to upload nude photos preemptively directly to Facebook Messenger, so the company can create a digital fingerprint of sorts for the file to then prevent it from being uploaded maliciously in the future.
▶ No.819166
>>816819
>women
>foreshadowing
▶ No.819171
>>816994
>not shaming willing sluts
▶ No.819191>>819375
Obvious solution to the problem:
Client puts pictures that are nudes in a folder.
Client uses the hash algorithm on the pictures.
Client sends hashes to Facebook to prevent revenge porn.
What will actually happen:
Client send actual nudes to Facebook (The younger the better).
Facebook claims that they take the hash and delete the photo.
Doesn't actually delete photo.
Mark Cheeseburger becomes the master of pornography on Earth and FBI and NSA will find these images on the dark web with a BTC price tag on it.
Mark won't be arrested.
Pedophiles rubs their hands in enjoyment as OC rains over them for free.
What a time to be alive where children will voluntarily send nudes to Jews.
▶ No.820361
>>816994
AIs are going to slut-shame.
Mark my words.