[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / fringe / furry / mde / newbrit / rzabczan / tech / uf0 / wx ]

/random/ - random

shitpost central
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Voice recorder Show voice recorder

(the Stop button will be clickable 5 seconds after you press Record)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

File: 9c07e41a526cfad⋯.jpg (116.97 KB, 214x570, 107:285, IMG_20201213_175722.jpg)

 No.25513

Why were girls allowed to watch boys swim naked?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.25588

>>25513

They needed to tell girls to suit up because most of the boys could not swim with a raging boner.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.25643

> In 1961, parents and students in Menasha, Wisconsin asked the school board to give boys permission to wear swim trunks to swimming practice. The board voted down the petition on the grounds that buying swim trunks would be expensive and that nude swimming built men's character; one board member asserted that "this experience is a good one for later life, for example the armed services, where the disregard for privacy is real and serious".

That past, even as near as 1960s, was fucking barbaric. An adult forcing kids to get naked is practically sexual abuse and pedophilic.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.25644

>>25643

Possibly, but not necessarily.

Are you aware that Dragon Ball on Cartoon Network showed kid Goku’s cock and balls without censoring on many occassions? I doubt it’d be allowed here, since it could count as Shota. Goku got naked every time he went swimming, and touched peoples’ genitals to check their genders.

Shota cock simply wasn’t seen as sexual back then. Today’s culture is very different.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.25645

File: 8733615b016d0cc⋯.jpg (61.35 KB, 800x420, 40:21, 3_4_20_biden_sniff.jpg)

File: c66c89a38d81c6c⋯.jpg (127.04 KB, 600x694, 300:347, biden2020forchildren.jpg)

File: ae6be6e8243a486⋯.jpg (58.74 KB, 600x401, 600:401, biden_creepy.jpg)

File: 39df0818ba3c593⋯.jpeg (113.08 KB, 700x1245, 140:249, sniffsniff.jpeg)

File: d5b727cd36593ec⋯.jpg (88.58 KB, 526x526, 1:1, takes2.jpg)

>>25643

Now it is kosher, parents only mutilating their child's genitals, and giving them hormones/drugs against their will.

No forced nudity if we don't count the mandatory communist genital inspections...

Children however are forced to watch nudity and porn now in kinder garden, to be adequately sexualized from a young age (according to plan), there are only tiny perversions like the male is always dark skinned on the posters, so it gives a clear message to the young white children that BBC is good.

And as always, papa Biden says: "Remember, nothing serious until you are 30."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / fringe / furry / mde / newbrit / rzabczan / tech / uf0 / wx ]