[–]▶ e485fb (3) No.30840[Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Q, please respond-I think Q is prepping us for the reality that there will be apples that have blemishes but are not rotten. Why? Because these apples shouldn’t and won’t be discarded during the housecleaning that happens at “the top”. He then explains part of the rationale: the SWAMP Is EVERYWHERE-it would be impossible to throw away all of the apples with blemishes because so many have blemishes. Let us think about this: some people are good people at the core and did not realize that they were playing a role in corruption. For example, I and all other employees in my position were instructed by an employer to fill out time sheets with just a standard “8am-5pm” for every day we worked. We all assumed it was because we were salaried employees. We just did what we were told. Later, I started collective action lawsuits because the hours we worked and the working conditions. I was accused by opposing counsel of lying on my time sheets during deposition and my stomach dropped. I was stunned because yes, it was technically a lie. Thankfully, I learned this was just a stunt. They lost all of the lawsuits and had to start paying overtime to all of the employees in my field. My point is I had done something unwittingly-something every other person did without any malicious intent. In fact, before the lawsuits started the employers were trying to protect themselves from future lawsuits by requiring us to only write 8-5 on all of our time sheets. They set up the scam and we all trusted them. It is conceivable that we will be seeing some “apples” with blemishes when THE SWAMP is exposed and Q wants us to not let bloodlust cause us to demand of Q that all blemished apples get thrown away. After all, the SWAMP has touched so many of them that our government wouldn’t be able to run without them. It is the apples with rotten cores that have to get tossed.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ e485fb (3) No.30841
Q directed us to read some of the five eyes posts slowly. When I read them, I saw that he used “former”. Could it be that he was trying to tell us that there are four more involved and it wasn’t just that there were former dignitaries?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ e485fb (3) No.30842>>30850
You guys, Q keeps trying to tell us that we cannot continue to look at those that aren’t awake as nuts, idiots, etc. We have to stay away from labeling people that argue with us because it makes us turn them off. We need them to come on board for us to sustain the revolution. Some people aren’t getting this message. We really, really need to engage with people as though they will see th light. No name calling. No bastardizing. Unless you want to be a part of the problem.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ f56415 (1) No.30850
>>30842
I agree with you 100% wake up those who aren’t awake yet.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.