/qresearch/ -  Q Research

Ziwe & Jack Schlossberg (JFK's grandson) photographed at the Harris/Walz campaign rally in Philadelphia.

>>21370688

Nigs will Nog.

>>21370664

>Virgina has been doing great since the fraud has been addressed

and it was trending "great" as the fraud was address. Meaning, WE ARE THE MAJORITY AND GROWING EVERY SECOND OF THE DAY.

Different angle of the rally that was apparently held inside a Heironymous Bosch hellscape.

>>21370742

I also got :33

odds of that?

>>21370754

>https://open.substack.com/pub/tomwigand/p/cisa-ing-power?r=8t3oo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

Is CISA – the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency – plotting a coup d’etat against the United States of America this coming election?

The answer could be: YES.

American Discerner by Thomas Wigand is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Coup d’etat sounds like a strong phrase. It is. An online dictionary defines it thus: “a sudden and decisive action in politics, especially one resulting in a change of government illegally or by force.”

Related to the 2020 election, most refer to it as having been “stolen” from President Trump. That would have been accurate had the act merely been the Democrat Party cheating as an act of political ambition only; to only serve to the benefit of the Democrat Party as a political competitor to the Republican Party.

It is fair to say that the plot around the 2020 election was far more widespread, involving government agencies, business interests, elected officials (probably of both major parties) and, likely, foreign governments. Actually, likely multiple foreign governments – and their compromised / treasonous U.S. citizen operatives. Here’s looking at you, China.

So, 2020 was actually a coup d’etat, replacing the duly re-elected President Trump with (what I refer to as) the “Biden-Harris Junta.”

Space does not permit a review of the coverup that followed, but for present purposes recall that then-director of CISA Chris Krebs notoriously claimed that the 2020 election was the most secure ever. Uh huh.

A few months ago American Discerner posted a piece hypothesizing that for the 2024 election CISA might “flip the script” and declare that there were software breaches, perhaps rendering the election uncertifiable, and throwing the selection of the President into the House of Representatives (where the Democrats and sycophant “Republicans” would then refuse to certify Donald J. Trump as the nominee). It is suggested that you read that piece, as it includes relevant information that won’t be regurgitated here.

WELL DANG!

In the last week it’s been revealed that Democrat Congressman Jamie Raskin has been openly discussing such a move, even with a certain amount of braggadocio opining that civil war would follow. That’s weird.

And, on July 31, 2024 CISA and the FBI released a statement warning of cyber-attacks on election infrastructure. To be more specific: “we are warning that DDoS attacks against election-related websites could temporarily disrupt access to some online election functions, like voter look-up tools, but would not prevent voting or compromise the integrity of voting systems.”

CISA and the FBI can predict what election functions will and will not be affected by a cyberattack months from now. That’s weird.

As we must with such people, let us parse that press release: “… some online functions, like voter look-up tools” could well be referring to the means by which poll workers identify voters upon check-in.

“Would not prevent voting or compromise the integrity of voting systems” — even if true, in this scenario, would still enable the hijacking of an election. If poll-workers can’t verify if someone’s name is even on the voter rolls, or if a “name” has already voted, it’s not a “conspiracy theory” to suppose that masses of people – such as illegal aliens and/or paid homeless people, etc. – could show up, be unverifiable, but still be allowed to cast a vote on those “uncompromised” voting machines.

That previous American Discerner piece included a link to a One America News montage that including a parade of Democrats decrying the horrible security of electronic election devices. As we know, they all clammed-up after the 2020 election. President Trump and his supporters who picked-up the vulnerable election machine banner were slammed by the Democrats and their supporters as (first) “conspiracy theorists” and then “insurrectionists.” All for raising points that the Democrats had been haranguing about for the immediately preceding years. That’s weird.

Along the way, True the Vote discovered that a Chinese-affiliated company (Konnech) – a major elections-software vendor doing business in the United States – was (at a minimum) illegally storing data about election workers on servers in China. True the Vote alerted the FBI office near Konnech’s U.S. headquarters in Michigan. At first, the local agents were hot to investigate the evidence produced by True the Vote. Then D.C. FBI got wind of it – killed the investigation – and instead sicced the FBI on True the Vote. That’s weird.

The July 31, 2024 CISA-FBI press release doesn’t mention which election vendors’ software are STILL vulnerable. That’s weird.

All-caps “STILL” is used because how can it be that with all the questioning about election machines and their accompanying software since at least 2016, CISA has by its own admission failed to ensure the security of this “critical infrastructure?” This is arguably worse than Secret Service-level incompetence.

Further, CISA still has months before the election to secure such software, and by its own admission is incapable to securing that software. Nor is CISA taking steps that would negate such interference, e.g., going to paper-only. That’s weird.

Or is this incompetence by design?

They’re advertising to the world and the bad actors within it that our election infrastructure is still insecure. Moreover, they’re effectively predictive-programming the public to expect “cyber-attacks” at election time.

This smells like a 2020 coup d’etat déjà vu in the works.

After all, like the proverbial cornered rats, cornered traitors know that they are in a literal “life or death” situation, and so will “by any means necessary” work to prevent a second Trump term. See, e.g., July 13, 2024.

Which is not to say we should give up and resign ourselves to a repeat of the 2020 coup d’etat.

Just spreading the word about what it is they may be setting up for makes it more difficult for them to accomplish it, and far more difficult for them to “sell” the results than they could after 2020. And, of course, getting as many people of faith and patriots registered and to the polls.

With God’s good grace – pray for our country and for the safety and success of President Trump, his family, staff and supporters – and applying our own human agency, we can beat the bastards.

THIS BREAD ENDED EARLY ON ITS OWN

BAKER IS BAKING A NEW BREAD

–BV

▶ Anonymous  07/08/23 (Sat) 16:14:05 a6d052 (1) No.19146602

File (hide): a766e55f03e31f8⋯.jpeg (322.15 KB,750x905,150:181,F0F7334B_7AD3_4F7E_99BF_1….jpeg) (h) (u)

I’ve got your sauce.

But you’re too scared to make it notable

▶Anonymous 04/30/20 (Thu) 19:37:31 f77b50 (4) No.8981939

>>8981922

Can we get a Q&A tonight?

https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1qIRovjdOEID9gmkPUKYdW57kx1j1WQGW

Playbooks

B drops

https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1tdM9MrOoYFf4RPQsn2FX1yuIpmFS50D2

>>21370713

Catching UP on breads after a binge. Just wanna reinvigorate this from ME.

God bless :) should be done in a day or two?