/qresearch/ -  Q Research

PLUTO AND THE SUN ENTER AQUARIUS SIMULTANEOUSLY.

THE END AND THE BEGINNING.

HAHAHAHAHHAAHHAAHAHA

>>20204409

i am actually more of a lefty in terms of things in general. i just have to force myself to be more conservative because we actually need to hunker down for a bit until we figure things out.

>>20204408

You need a better example of adult behavior to follow.

>>20204335

Trump leads Haley in Iowa, NH, and SC.

She can't even lead in her own state!

She's toast by Super Tuesday.

STS-134 - The final launch of Endeavour - Full Launch in HD

You morons still haven't realized just how much you fucked up?

GOOD GRIEF & LMFAO

>>20204413

"He was a very useful public relations entity for physics, and they didn't want to lose him."

>>20204411

Dubs check out.

Biden's Valley Forge Theater and the Unraveling of Jan 6

On the three-year anniversary of the Capitol protest, Joe Biden will portray himself as a modern-day George Washington saving "democracy" from evil.But the public is buying his schtick less and less.

JULIE KELLY

JAN 4, 2024

Joe Biden plans to commemorate the third anniversary of the events of January 6 by giving a speech Friday morning near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, the historic site where General George Washington regrouped the Continental Army despite all odds in 1777-78.

After years of comparing Jan 6 to 9/11, Pearl Harbor, and the Oklahoma City bombing,Biden will again desecrate hallowed ground and the graves of the victims—roughly 2,000 soldiers died over a six-month period at the Valley Forge encampment—to prioritize the largely peaceful protest at the Capitol as a pivotal event in American history.

Fighting Trump and his supporters, the stunt apparently is supposed to demonstrate, is just like living in subhuman conditions fighting starvation, hypothermia, and deadly diseases to prevail over the British crown. (Ironically, Biden moved up the speech from Saturday to Friday amid bad weather forecasts.)

“The president will make the case directly that democracy and freedom—two powerful ideas that united the 13 colonies and that generations throughout our nation's history have fought and died for—remains (sic) central to the fight we're in today," said Quentin Fulks, Biden’s deputy campaign manager.

What Biden and his history-illiterate team don’t realize in their latest attempt to ratchet upcomparisons between America’s most fraught moments and a four-hour disturbance on public property during a Wednesday afternoon where the only people killed were Trump supporters is that Biden is King George III, not Washington or the rebels: an intemperate and entitled ruler clinging to power by intentionally provoking his subjects while using whatever force necessary to crush the opposition.

Biden’s Valley Forge performance also underscores the Democratic Party’s desperationto sustain the January 6 “insurrection” narrative throughout the 2024 presidential campaign; his first campaign adreleased Thursday includes several familiar scenes of the Capitol protest. Bearing a dismal record across the board resulting in mass unpopularity even among his own voters, Biden is pinning his re-election hopes on the notion he is General Washington leading the charge to save “democracy” from the imaginary threat of Trump and MAGA extremists.

Dysentery, where are you when we need you most?

Public Support of J6 Narrative Declining

Timing comes as the public’s investment in J6 propaganda continues to slide. According to a newWashington Post poll, only a slim majority of Americans believe January 6 was “an attack on democracy that should never be forgotten,” a figure inflated by 89 percent of Biden voters who agree. Only half of respondents think January 6 was “mostly violent” including just 18 percent of Republicans, down from 26 percent in 2021; less than half agree that Trump should be disqualified from office over the events of January 6.

And despite a steady onslaught of criminal and Congressional investigations coupled with news coverage to bolster the claim that the 2020 presidential election was above reproach, public trust in that election has slipped since January 6. Overall trust in the election fell 10 percent in the past three years even among independents. Only 31 percent of Republicans now say Biden was legitimately elected, a 20 percent drop since 2021.

More bad news could be just around the corner. The U.S. Supreme Court might—and I use that word with uncharacteristic optimism—open a can of whoop ass on Biden’s Department of Justice, federal courts in Washington, and other partisan interests advancing the J6 narrative….

https://www.declassified.live/p/bidens-valley-forge-theater-and-the

>>20204412

>Oh. I haven't seen that.

Here you go.

>>16440518 pb

Once again: RemoveRestrictions.bat from Mike Lindell Sympossium proves widespread election fraud. Essentially what the script does is switches a voting machine local security to point to a temporary database so nefarious activities can be logged there and leave no trace. Then after the machine reboots, it utilizes the normal database that is on the local hard drive.

Echo off means no output to console

Echo on means output to console, used for debugging

Line by Line

1 Shut off output to console window and set a local variable enableextensions to true

2 types Removing Security Restrictions out to console, when Echo is on

3. sets the configuration for the database, db, to a temp database and silently overwrites the initiatization file. This is the database that the windows local security authority logs all information, metrics, and changes to the system. It is the machines system of records.

4. Overwrites the GroupPolicy for the windows/system32 giving it new authority rules and policies.

5. Modifies the windows registry to force it to accept the new security providers

6. if errorlevel os negative or 0 pause

7. types Critical restrictions disabled when Echo is on, set on line 1, and types Registry value that indicates the current hardening state

8. Modifies Dominion SQL database registry key Hardened variable and forces a Dehardened-WS2016 string to be set.

9. Sets the local machines SQL server socket network library to disable encryption

10 stop the SQL database

11 start the SQL database without encryption

12 starts the SQLServerAgent

Because this is a script, it takes a long time to write and test to get correct. This is only done when one wants to repeat the same tasks on many many machines instead of doing commands by interacting with the mouse and keyboard. Because it tampers with a machines local security on a voting machine it is a crime. In addition, to run a web server on a voting machine is remote access; which is also illegal.

>>20204422

Stay alive and find out.

>>20204403

>Are you gonna wear those hideous pants again?

Lol

>>20204427

yea ok but wot about trump letting an election be stolen and now everyone is getting raped by niggers and vaccines?

>>20204435

also illegal guns still need to be dealt with no? even trump was calling for a mental health check for gun buyers.

>totally straight hand gestures while astrologizing

>>20204393

Seriously anon put the title on the video, its ignored otherwise

>>20204423

“The important thing is that the feelings, where they are there, are very much true to our experiences. So from an emotional point of view, it’s spot on. The only thing is that they’ve had to minimise the strains and struggles, because in our real life the difficulties of dealing with Stephen’s disease were much greater than they appear in the film.”

And, yes, the impression given in the film that she and Stephen managed to split up without too much acrimony – and that Jane’s new partner and now husband, musician Jonathan Hellyer Jones, became part of their immediate family – is indeed an accurate one (although for a long time after they met, their relationship was platonic).

Jane met Jonathan when, to give her a break from the constant demands of caring for Stephen, a friend suggested she should take up singing in the local church choir, run by Jonathan. It was 1977. The Hawkings, then parents of two young children, were living in Cambridge, where he was garnering a reputation as one of the most glittering scientists of his generation. Jane, though, was isolated and overwrought. How much were the demands on their marriage the product of Stephen’s disease – without it, might they still be married today? Jane isn’t sure: although his health was a huge strain, there were others. From the outset, Stephen’s “eccentric” family made no secret of the fact that they didn’t think the marriage would survive.

“Stephen’s mother once said to me, ‘We don’t like you because you don’t fit into our family.’” On another occasion she learned by chance that the Hawkings were planning to move to Cambridge so they could be there when the marriage foundered, as they were sure it eventually would.

But it wasn’t just about a lack of support from the wider family. “The truth was, there were four partners in our marriage,” says Jane. “Stephen and me, motor neurone disease and physics. If you took out motor neurone disease, you are still left with physics. Mrs Einstein, you know, cited physics as a difference for her divorce …”

During their marriage, she says, Stephen would retreat into himself. And, though he tried to explain physics to her, she always felt shut out of the world that was so crucial to him. But the stresses of MND were not solely or even mostly down to the physical difficulties of the condition; what brought even greater disruption to their lives was the advent of the carers who shared their home, who disapproved of aspects of their lives, and whose presence meant they could never have the privacy that every family needs to thrive.

“They whispered about us and they undermined me,” says Jane. It’s clear the pain is still there. One of those nurses, Elaine Mason, went on to become his second wife, though the two later divorced. This is an episode of their lives Jane is reluctant to rake over, although it was this relationship that tipped the Hawkings into splitting up, rather than her relationship with Jonathan. Why did they carry on for so long, even after she had met Jonathan and become close to him? She says it never felt like a choice: she loved Jonathan and depended on him for support, but she absolutely loved Stephen as well.

“There was no alternative to just carrying on. I felt very committed to Stephen, and I didn’t think he could manage without me. I wanted him to carry on doing his amazing work, and I wanted the children to have a stable family behind them – so we just carried on.”

In real life, as in the film, Jonathan became part of the family, sharing the workload of caring for Stephen with Jane, and helping bring up the children. He had been widowed a couple of years before they met. “What brought us together,” says Jane, “was loneliness. We were both very lonely people, and then we found one another.”

continued

>>20204418

how is a 28 year old nignog raping my 15yo cousin related to that?

>>20204435

In a sting operation, you allow the criminals to complete the crime while recording the evidence.

It's not rocket science, just on a bigger scale than your corner crack dealer.

Why would they put squeeze on Hawkings?

What did {they} dislike about his theories?

>>20204353

question. the fake pregnancy's of the hollyweird and others.. where are they really getting their babies from?

so many on here have adopted/gay/surrogate and woman so spoiled usually don't want to deal with weight gain and watnots. so where are they getting the children from. high end adoption not a thing? just a thought

>>20204423

>>20204443

>>20204450

Jane Hawking

Jane Hawking: ‘The ­difficulties of dealing with Stephen’s disease were much greater than they appear in the film.’

Her relationship with Stephen started when both refused to be daunted by the fact that Stephen had just been diagnosed with terminal motor neurone disease. They ploughed into marriage in the face of his parents’ pessimism about its chances of success, and had three children. In the face of pressures that were almost too much to bear, and alongside her friendship with another man, they somehow kept their marriage together for a quarter of a century before ending it with a remarkable degree of equanimity.

Does the film present an accurate portrait of their marriage, which began at Trinity Hall in Cambridge in 1965?

“The important thing is that the feelings, where they are there, are very much true to our experiences. So from an emotional point of view, it’s spot on. The only thing is that they’ve had to minimise the strains and struggles, because in our real life the difficulties of dealing with Stephen’s disease were much greater than they appear in the film.”

And, yes, the impression given in the film that she and Stephen managed to split up without too much acrimony – and that Jane’s new partner and now husband, musician Jonathan Hellyer Jones, became part of their immediate family – is indeed an accurate one (although for a long time after they met, their relationship was platonic).

Jane met Jonathan when, to give her a break from the constant demands of caring for Stephen, a friend suggested she should take up singing in the local church choir, run by Jonathan. It was 1977. The Hawkings, then parents of two young children, were living in Cambridge, where he was garnering a reputation as one of the most glittering scientists of his generation. Jane, though, was isolated and overwrought. How much were the demands on their marriage the product of Stephen’s disease – without it, might they still be married today? Jane isn’t sure: although his health was a huge strain, there were others. From the outset, Stephen’s “eccentric” family made no secret of the fact that they didn’t think the marriage would survive.

contined

>>20204446

or you can just declare war on niggas and save the day anyways without everyone getting raped dumbfuck.

>>20204452

“Stephen’s mother once said to me, ‘We don’t like you because you don’t fit into our family.’” On another occasion she learned by chance that the Hawkings were planning to move to Cambridge so they could be there when the marriage foundered, as they were sure it eventually would.

Jane and Stephen Hawking

Jane and Stephen Hawking in 1974.

But it wasn’t just about a lack of support from the wider family. “The truth was, there were four partners in our marriage,” says Jane. “Stephen and me, motor neurone disease and physics. If you took out motor neurone disease, you are still left with physics. Mrs Einstein, you know, cited physics as a difference for her divorce …”

During their marriage, she says, Stephen would retreat into himself. And, though he tried to explain physics to her, she always felt shut out of the world that was so crucial to him. But the stresses of MND were not solely or even mostly down to the physical difficulties of the condition; what brought even greater disruption to their lives was the advent of the carers who shared their home, who disapproved of aspects of their lives, and whose presence meant they could never have the privacy that every family needs to thrive.

“They whispered about us and they undermined me,” says Jane. It’s clear the pain is still there. One of those nurses, Elaine Mason, went on to become his second wife, though the two later divorced. This is an episode of their lives Jane is reluctant to rake over, although it was this relationship that tipped the Hawkings into splitting up, rather than her relationship with Jonathan. Why did they carry on for so long, even after she had met Jonathan and become close to him? She says it never felt like a choice: she loved Jonathan and depended on him for support, but she absolutely loved Stephen as well.

“There was no alternative to just carrying on. I felt very committed to Stephen, and I didn’t think he could manage without me. I wanted him to carry on doing his amazing work, and I wanted the children to have a stable family behind them – so we just carried on.”

In real life, as in the film, Jonathan became part of the family, sharing the workload of caring for Stephen with Jane, and helping bring up the children. He had been widowed a couple of years before they met. “What brought us together,” says Jane, “was loneliness. We were both very lonely people, and then we found one another.”

So the formal split in the Hawkings’ marriage didn’t come until the early 1990s, by which time the oldest children were in their late teens and 20s and the youngest late addition, Timothy, was 10. In real life, as in the film, Jane says there is no doubt that Timothy is Stephen’s child, not Jonathan’s. She is proud of the way she and Stephen and Jonathan kept their lives on an even track for so long. “But once the breakup happened, things absolutely exploded. The lines of communication became much more difficult for a while.”

continued

>>20204455

Even when a marriage has petered out gradually, it still takes time to recover, she says. “They reckon you have to allow at least one year for every five years of marriage to recover before you can pick up the reins and find yourself again.”

Jane and Jonathan eventually married in 1997. How has that union compared with her first one? “I don’t think of my life as having two marriages, I think of it as a continuum,” she says. “We all lived in such harmony, and for so long, until the divorce and the disruption.”

But her two relationships have been very different. “I’ve been able to lean on Jonathan – we can lean on one another,” she says.

“Whereas in the past with Stephen, he was dependent on me all the time. He worked very hard and he was very successful, but I never felt I could lean on him emotionally or confide in him.”

Another difference is that, where physics divided her and Stephen because she was not of that world, music unites her and Jonathan: he is head of music at Magdalene College, and Jane sings regularly in choirs and as a soloist.

Today, Stephen lives just round the corner from Jane and Jonathan. When we meet, she has just returned from visiting him, and they’re all planning to meet for Sunday lunch with Lucy, the couple’s daughter, at the weekend.

Stephen has taken part in many of the publicity events for The Theory of Everything, which was based on Jane’s memoir of their time together. Now 71, she and Jonathan divide their life between Cambridge and their house in northern France, and she makes regular visits to Seattle where her and Stephen’s eldest child, Robert, works for Microsoft and has a son and a daughter.

Dear Katie Hopkins. Stop making life harder for disabled people

Lucy Hawking

Read more

Lucy is the mother of an autistic son, so as a grandmother Jane has taken up the cudgels she once employed as a wife, and campaigns for better rights for disabled people – her current battle centres on the cuts to the Independent Living Fund, which she says will stop people like her grandson from living independent lives. It has brought her full circle, and she feels as passionately about it as she ever did.

“Being Stephen’s carer was such a struggle, and it’s a lonely job looking after a disabled person. Thinking back, I honestly wonder how I got through it. But what you hope is that the years since have brought improvements to the lives of disabled people and their carers, and I think for a while it was like that. But now the clock is turning back, and we can’t let that happen.”

end

>>20204434

Shit almoast forgot

TYB!

PSSSST

NOATE TAKER…

Might wanna add the Golden Globes Pedo Stuff…

>>20204429

This decode proves it all and it is indisputable.

1. Tampering, and overwriting a voting machines security provider from the operating system

2. Shutting down a SQL database encryption

3. Running a web server on a voting machine is remote access and illegal.

4. Script form proves wide spread use and fraud.

This is the only thing that we ever need to overturn the entire election. I believe this was from the Georgia voting machines.

>>20204247

Here you go anon, post the video if you want anyone to pay attention (click “show posts and options below”, and insert the link for it to play on the board)

Senator John Kennedy's 2023 Highlights- He grills Yellen, Garland, Wray, & moar

This past year, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) had many notable moments grilling Biden Administration nominees in Senate hearings.

700,549 views 2:54:48

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6ZfjixCDMw

Here you go anon, post the video also

>>20204445

You keep it up and you’ll be raped by him sounds like to me.

>>20204430

proper fucked

>>20204452

hawkings was replaced

read the mathis' essays

>>20204407

>>20204413

>>20204429

This is also why people were seen walking around with USB thumb drives. All they had to do is stick in a thumb drive, the windows explorer opens, they click on one batch file, everything is altered in a few seconds, and the machine automatically reboots, they pull out the thumb drive while the system is booting and log in. In and out within a minute at best.