[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/qresearch/ -  Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


Welcome Page | Archive | qnotables archive | Q's Board: /projectdcomms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS /TheStorm | TOR link
Practice Bake HERE: /comms | /qrn |

File: 79844a5ed2ade13⋯.jpg (180.82 KB,1200x600,2:1,OZ_Q_PAIN.jpg)

505112 No.18670265 [Last50 Posts]

Welcome To Q Research AUSTRALIA

A new thread for research and discussion of Australia's role in The Great Awakening.

Previous thread

>>18422592 Q Research AUSTRALIA #28

Q's Posts made on Q Research AUSTRALIA threads

Wednesday 11.20.2019

>>7358352 ————————————–——– These people are stupid.

>>7358338 ————————————–——– All assets [F + D] being deployed.

>>7358318 ————————————–——– What happens when the PUBLIC discovers the TRUTH [magnitude] re: [D] party corruption?

Tuesday 11.19.2019

>>7357790 ————————————–——– FISA goes both ways.

Saturday 11.16.2019

>>7356270 ————————————–——– There is no escaping God.

>>7356265 ————————————–——– The Harvest [crop] has been prepared and soon will be delivered to the public for consumption.

Friday 11.15.2019

>>7356017 ————————————–——– "Whistle Blower Traps" [Mar 4 2018] 'Trap' keyword select provided.....

Thursday 03.28.2019

>>5945210 ————————————–——– Sometimes our 'sniffer' picks and pulls w/o applying credit file

>>5945074 ————————————–——– We LOVE you!

>>5944970 ————————————–——– USA v. LifeLog?

>>5944908 ————————————–——– It is an embarrassment to our Nation!

>>5944859 ————————————–——– 'Knowingly'

Q's Posts referencing Australia

https://qanon.pub/?q=AUS

https://qanon.pub/?q=australia

https://qanon.pub/?q=koala

https://qanon.pub/?q=HouseOfCards

https://qanon.pub/?q=boomerang

https://qanon.pub/?q=45HarisonHarold

https://qanon.pub/?q=6572656

https://qanon.pub/?q=RAT%20BAIT

https://qanon.pub/?q=VERY%20important

https://qanon.pub/?q=remain%20in%20the%20light

https://qanon.pub/?q=news.com.au

Q's Posts referencing Australian citizens

Malcolm Turnbull (X/AUS)

Former Prime Minister of Australia, 2015 to 2018

https://qanon.pub/?q=X%2FAUS

https://qanon.pub/?q=call%20details

https://qanon.pub/?q=Threat%20to%20AUS

Alexander Downer

Former Australian Liberal Party politician and former Australian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom

https://qanon.pub/?q=Downer

Cardinal George Pell

Australian Cardinal of the Catholic Church and former Prefect of the Vatican Secretariat for the Economy

https://qanon.pub/?q=Pell

https://qanon.pub/?q=cardinal-george-pell

https://qanon.pub/?q=pecking

Julian Assange

Australian activist, founder, editor and publisher of WikiLeaks

https://qanon.pub/?q=assange

https://qanon.pub/?q=JA

https://qanon.pub/?q=Under%20protection

https://qanon.pub/?q=WL

https://qanon.pub/?q=wikileaks

https://qanon.pub/?q=crowdstrike

https://qanon.pub/?q=server

https://qanon.pub/?q=Seth

https://qanon.pub/?q=SR

https://qalerts.app/?q=snowden

https://qalerts.app/?q=roadmap

Virginia Roberts Giuffre

American-Australian survivor of the sex trafficking ring operated by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

https://qanon.pub/#4568

https://qanon.pub/#4728

https://qanon.pub/#1054

https://qanon.pub/?q=chandler

https://qanon.pub/?q=epstein

https://qanon.pub/?q=island

https://qanon.pub/#1001

https://qanon.pub/#1861

https://qanon.pub/#3145

https://qanon.pub/#3147

https://qanon.pub/#4578

https://qanon.pub/#3432

https://qanon.pub/#3497

https://qanon.pub/#4727

https://qanon.pub/#4797

https://qanon.pub/?q=wexner

https://qanon.pub/#4576

https://qanon.pub/#4577

https://qanon.pub/?q=maxwell

https://qanon.pub/#4569

https://qanon.pub/?q=spacey

https://qanon.pub/#4570

https://qanon.pub/?q=normalize

https://qanon.pub/?q=Prince%20Andrew

https://qanon.pub/#4579

https://qanon.pub/#4907

https://qanon.pub/#4911

https://qanon.pub/#4921

https://qanon.pub/?q=Welcome%20aboard.

https://qanon.pub/?q=dershowitz

https://qanon.pub/?q=Dearest%20Virginia

Q's Posts referencing The Five Eyes intelligence alliance (FVEY)

An anglophone intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States

https://qanon.pub/?q=FVEY

https://qanon.pub/?q=Five%20Eyes

https://qanon.pub/?q=Interesting%2C

https://qanon.pub/?q=RAT%20BAIT

"Does AUS stand w/ the US or only select divisions within the US?"

Q

Nov 25 2018

https://qanon.pub/#2501

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670275

Notables

are not endorsements

#28 - Part 1

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>18427819 Court in the act: what else is voice lobby not telling us? - "Has there ever been a more flagrant attempt to deceive the Australian people than the Albanese government’s effort to force-feed the voice into our Constitution? Aided and abetted by an army of activist advisers and cheerleaders, Anthony Albanese and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney lead what can only be described as the great deception. The root cause of this deception is that the objective of this campaign is to enact a massive change to our constitutional arrangements, namely to begin the process of replacing our long-treasured sole and exclusive sovereignty of the crown with the form of co-sovereignty between the crown and Indigenous Australia demanded by the Uluru Statement from the Heart. This, in turn, is a first step to treaty and self-determination. This radical step could be implemented only by pretending the change was modest, encasing it with feel-good atmospherics, backed up with frequent browbeating." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18432693 Lisa Wilkinson seeks to defend Bruce Lehrmann defamation suit by proving rape claim - Veteran journalist Lisa Wilkinson will seek to prove former federal Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann raped his then-colleague Brittany Higgins in Parliament House as part of a truth defence to his defamation claim against her and Network Ten.

>>18432699 Lisa Wilkinson ‘understood’ Brittany Higgins’ allegations against Bruce Lehrmann had been fact-checked: Defence - Lisa Wilkinson is “not a lawyer” and understood her interviews with Brittany Higgins were thoroughly checked by Channel 10’s legal team, her defence has claimed - In the 23-page legal document defending Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation claim against her and her employer, Ms Wilkinson’s team claimed she was not familiar with defamation law and “would have complied with any and all” advice or request from lawyers to alter her reporting.

>>18432707 Higgins to give evidence for Wilkinson in Lehrmann defamation fight - Brittany Higgins is prepared to give evidence as part of Lisa Wilkinson’s truth defence in the defamation case brought against the veteran journalist by Bruce Lehrmann, who is suing over an interview that he says accuses him of raping Higgins in Parliament House.

>>18432749 Video: Muslim and Christian communities to protest at Sydney’s Hyde Park over Jesus joke on The Project - Christian and Muslim leaders have dismissed Channel 10’s apology for a “disgusting” joke mocking their faith and have revealed plans to protest at Sydney’s Hyde Park - Thousands of viewers unleashed their anger on social media after queer comedian Reuben Kaye made a gag on its prime-time show The Project about Jesus on Tuesday night - Reuben explained that he regularly gets people negatively messaging him on TikTok and they criticise his sexuality from a “religious angle” - “I think it’s hilarious when someone messages me and says, ‘You have to accept Jesus’ love or you will burn in hell,’ because I love Jesus,” Kaye said - “I love any man who can get nailed for three days straight and come back for more.” - The Project host Waleed Aly and his fellow host Sarah Harris burst out laughing along with the other panellists - The severe backlash forced the hosts to issue an apology on-air on Wednesday night.

>>18432793 Trump attacks Murdoch for ‘throwing his anchors under the table’ - Donald Trump has attacked Rupert Murdoch in a blistering statement, accusing him of betraying his Fox News television hosts by admitting that he doubted their conclusions about the 2020 election - “Why is Rupert Murdoch throwing his anchors under the table,” the former US president posted to his platform Truth Social - “There is MASSIVE evidence of voter fraud & irregularities in the 2020 Presidential Election,” Trump wrote, repeating the lie he has promoted since losing the election to Joe Biden.

>>18438320 Bruce Lehrmann could face cross-examination in two weeks over Lisa Wilkinson defamation case timing - Bruce Lehrmann could be called to face cross-examination in two weeks’ time to explain why he did not file defamation proceedings against Lisa Wilkinson and Network Ten within the usual 12-month time limit - Defamation claims are typically required to be filed within 12 months of the relevant publication. But in this case, Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson’s interviews with Brittany Higgins and the related publications were published in February 2021, two years before Lehrmann began proceedings - Lehrmann’s legal team is pushing for the limitation period to be extended.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670278

#28 - Part 2

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>18438389 Cheap Australian drones made of cardboard helping Ukrainian troops - Cheap Australian drones made of cardboard and rubber bands are helping Ukrainian troops fight off Russian invaders, as part of a $33m commitment to supply the ­country with an array of unmanned systems - At least 100 of the flat-packed drones are being supplied to Ukraine each month, allowing President Volodymyr Zelensky’s forces to drop bombs, deliver supplies and undertake vital reconnaissance missions - The unmanned aerial vehicles, made by Melbourne-based Sypaq, are designed to be expendable on the battlefield, but some in Ukraine have undertaken 60 flights - The Precision Payload Delivery System drones are constructed from thick, wax-coated cardboard and heavy-duty rubber bands that secure the wings.

>>18438407 Australia's Space Command pushes for 'soft kill' capability to take out enemy satellites - The head of the ADF's Space Command says Australia is working on a plan to acquire "soft-kill" capabilities to take out enemy satellites without creating dangerous debris - One year since the command was established, Air Vice Marshal Cath Roberts has given an update on its initial activities and the threats posed to Australian assets in space - Air Vice Marshal Roberts says since the launch of Defence Space Command in March 2022, the number of satellites in space had more than doubled to around 8000.

>>18438530 Catholic Archbishop invites The Project panelists to Sunday service to better understand impact on Christians of guest's offensive joke about Jesus - Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher has expressed deep disappointment about the 'inappropriate' ridiculing of Christian beliefs and wrote to Channel 10 owners Paramount ANZ - 'Many us are saddened and bewildered at the shocking comments about the crucifixion of Jesus which aired on The Project earlier this week,' he told parishioners - 'It's incredible that a mainstream television program would mock the beliefs of more than half of all Australians.' - 'In this season of Lent, let us continue to do penances for these all too common acts of blasphemy, and pray that the eyes of the ignorant will be opened to the life that Christ offers us.'

>>18444149 Katherine Deves in feminist fightback against Queensland name-your-gender laws - A radical feminist group operating under the banner of International Women’s Day will host a conference and rally on Saturday in protest against Queensland’s moves to allow gender self-identification on birth certificates - Former Liberal candidate Katherine Deves, who campaigned against transgender athletes in last year’s federal election, is among speakers at the conference organised by IWD Brisbane Meanjin, a self-described “left-wing women’s liberation organisation” - The Palaszczuk government’s bill, which the legal affairs and safety committee last week recommended be passed, will allow trans and gender-diverse people to change the sex on their birth certificate without undergoing sexual reassignment surgery.

>>18444173 Nigel Farage slams Australia a ‘wokest place in the world’ in US speech - UK Brexit leader Nigel Farage has slammed Australia as the “wokest place on Earth” in a fiery speech in the US that blamed big tech for spreading “poison” through English speaking nations - Mr Farage stole the show on the second day of the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, which included speeches – drawing significantly less applause – from former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley - “Governments, state governments in America, took away from us liberties and freedoms that had been fought for generations and centuries, we gave unlimited power to people to lock us inside our houses, tell us we couldn’t visit elderly relatives, in our case [the UK] couldn’t even play golf or go fishing,” Mr Farage said - “This is what tyranny looks like,” he added, admitting he had broken numerous lockdown rules in the UK, including illegally visiting his parents and friends - “Go to Australia, which has now become one of the wokest places on earth,” he bemoaned, dwelling on what he said was a rare “bit of good news” in the Antipodes: the resignation of Jacinda Ardern.

>>18444210 Nikki Haley heckled as Trump movement dominates Conservatives conference - Some of Trump’s biggest rivals, such as Florida governor Ron DeSantis and former vice president Mike Pence, decided to skip the three-day summit, highlighting the deepening divisions within the GOP over its ties to the former president - Others, such as Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley, showed up to make their pitch, only to be heckled with chants of “We Love Trump” as she obliged supporters who asked for selfies and autographs after her speech.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670291

#28 - Part 3

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>18449342 ‘I am your warrior’: Fiery Trump promises to end wars, pay baby bonus - National Harbour, Maryland: Donald Trump has ramped up his 2024 presidential bid with a fiery speech in which he attacked his own party, pledged to stop funding endless wars and vowed to give out baby bonuses to kick off a reproductive boom in America.

>>18449349 $100m blowout hits Australia’s new embassy in Washington DC - Taxpayers have had to cough up an extra $100m for Australia’s new home in Washington DC, which will boast views of the White House when it opens this year.

>>18449357 Three Sydney United 58 fans charged under new Nazi symbol law - Crowd footage broadcast by Network 10 showed some Sydney United fans waving flags and banners featuring logos and symbolism closely associated with the Ustashe, a regime which collaborated with Nazi Germany during World War II and was responsible for the deaths of thousands of Jews, Serbs and Romani people.

>>18449371 WorldPride: Anthony Albanese joins march across Harbour Bridge - Anthony Albanese was among 50,000 marching across Sydney Harbour Bridge as part of WorldPride - The Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Penny Wong were greeted with cheers as they arrived at the march - It follows Mr Albanese being the first prime minister to march as part of Mardi Gras earlier this month.

>>18454205 WA Police Commissioner Colin Blanch praises American drug agents - Two US Drug Enforcement Administration officers who were forced out of Australia after complaints by the Australian Federal Police to US ambassador Caroline Kennedy have been publicly praised for uncovering what is claimed to be the country’s biggest ever cocaine haul - The agents, who are based in Sydney, tipped off police in Western Australia that 2.8 tonnes, valued at a billion dollars, was allegedly being shipped by a Mexican drug cartel to their shores leading to the arrest of 12 people including 8 from NSW in the past few weeks - “We worked with these two officers on this job, they are the ones that provided us with the lead,’’ said WA Police Commissioner Colin Blanch in a clear rebuke of the position taken by his federal counterpart, Commissioner Reece Kershaw.

>>18457200 Perth Mint sold diluted gold to China, got caught, and tried to cover it up - The historic Perth Mint is facing a potential $9 billion recall of gold bars after selling diluted or "doped" bullion to China and then covering it up, according to a leaked internal report.

>>18460361 Inside the Kennedy approach to US diplomacy - If you’re the daughter of one of America’s most famous presidents and part of the country’s most glamorous political dynasty, making a splash as US ambassador to Australia should be as easy as getting out of bed - What’s more, the US-Australia relationship is practically running itself at the moment: with both countries on the sharp edge of the strategic contest with China, initiatives such as AUKUS are flowing naturally out of the alliance’s policy pipeline - But Caroline Kennedy, who has been President Joe Biden’s envoy in Canberra for eight months, is taking none of this for granted.

>>18466555 News Life Media files defence in Bruce Lehrmann defamation case - News Life Media will seek to prove Bruce Lehrmann lied to police about why he was at Parliament House on the night he allegedly raped Brittany Higgins, and showed a “consciousness of guilt”.

>>18466676 ‘It worked for us’: Alexander Downer urges UK to take Australia’s zero-tolerance approach to boats - Former foreign minister Alexander Downer has called on the UK to follow his hard line policy on banning illegal people smugglers from entering Australia, saying: “It worked for us, Britain should do the same.”

>>18472586 Hillsong ‘committed fraud, evaded tax’: Andrew Wilkie - Independent Andrew Wilkie has tabled documents to parliament he says show Hillsong Church has committed fraud, money laundering and tax evasion, with revelations Hillsong earns more than $80m in Australian income than it reports publicly.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670294

#28 - Part 4

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>18472715 A year on, still no investigation into Kitching’s claims - "A year ago on Friday, my very dear friend Kimberley Kitching died. She died of a heart attack caused in large part, I believe, by the stress of workplace bullying in the Australian Senate. The bullying of Kimberley needs thorough investigation, especially after Penny Wong’s well-known 'childless' comments and after Kimberley was removed from key positions, such as the Senate tactics committee, and her demotion from the shadow ministry. There’s a pattern of behaviour here. That Wong continues to hold her position without an investigation speaks volumes for what Labor rewards. For those who are seeking guidance about how to advance in the ALP, they will see Wong’s actions as acceptable, even to be rewarded." - Cameron Milner - theaustralian.com.au

>>18472800 Gone Almighty: Council halts Christian prayer after legal warning - An urgent business motion was passed by the City of Boroondara last week to amend governance rules to remove reference to the prayer, which asks God to “direct and prosper [council’s] deliberations to the advancement of your glory and the true welfare of the people”. Jennifer Kanis, social justice principal at Maurice Blackburn lawyers, wrote to the council this year, advising that the inclusion of the prayer was unlawful under the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities.

>>18478778 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese declares India 'top tier' security partner during aircraft carrier visit - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has used a landmark visit to India's flagship carrier INS Vikrant to declare that India is a "top tier" defence partner and announce Indian forces will join the massive Talisman Sabre war games in Australia this year.

>>18478825 ‘Bullied and undermined’: Thorpe says she quit Greens over treatment by MPs - Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has alleged that she quit the Greens because she was bullied and undermined by several of her party room colleagues, saying she lodged a written complaint about her treatment with leader Adam Bandt and the parliament’s workplace misconduct support service last year.

>>18478953 Charities watchdog to review fraud allegations made in parliament against Hillsong - The charities watchdog will review allegations made in parliament that Hillsong church misused the donations of its members. Independent MP Andrew Wilkie has used parliamentary privilege to accuse Hillsong church of breaking financial laws in Australia and around the world relating to "fraud, money laundering and tax evasion". Mr Wilkie claimed tens of thousands of leaked financial records and documents — including credit card statements, details of designer gifts and the use of private jets — show a misuse of church funds and lavish spending.

>>18484965 Fugitive Comanchero Hasan Topal found to be directing criminal activity in AN0M sting - A one-time model turned fugitive Comanchero bikie boss has been found to be directing criminal activity from his foreign bolthole. Fugitive Comanchero Hasan Topal directed criminal underlings to do his dirty work in the streets of Melbourne while being monitored by police. The name of the Melbourne bikie boss was revealed in court documents showing he gave sophisticated orders to his Australian underlings via the ill-fated ANOM app. Those messages were among millions intercepted by the Australian Federal Police and the United States Federal Bureau of Intelligence.

>>18485011 The shed where border officials take on the drug trade to Australia - The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald were given an exclusive tour of the Australian Border Force facility near Melbourne Airport to see how officials are tackling an unprecedented wave of illicit drugs making its way to Australian shores. Most of the drug shipments were hidden inside household items being transported by air cargo such as pumps, lamps, baby carriers and ink cartridges but Rosemond said some crooks were becoming more brazen in their attempts to smuggle drugs, sending them inside a parcel without attempting to disguise them. Traffickers have previously soaked drugs into clothing, hidden narcotics in car parts, filled more than 1600 mustard bottles with liquid methamphetamine, smuggled 300 kilograms of MDMA inside bottles of 2016 Bordeaux wine, and replaced the contents of cereal boxes with cannabis.

>>18485079 Rupert Murdoch’s ‘stupid emails’ have exposed the inner workings of his empire - An extraordinary paper trail has exposed the inner workings of Murdoch’s Fox media empire, revealing how he shapes coverage at his newspapers and cable networks and interacts with some of the most powerful figures in the Republican Party - After the assault on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, Murdoch seemed ready to use his power as never before — to cleanse the party of Trump once and for all.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670296

#28 - Part 5

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>18485201 Donald J. Trump Truth: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109997309210727072

>>18485201 Miranda Devine Tweet: This is the same useless Alvin Bragg who lets crime run rampant while he wastes time and our tax dollars persecuting Trump over a personal matter that is none of the Manhattan DA’s business. A young woman was raped in a stairwell on the upper west side last weekend FCOL

>>18485227 Jack Posobiec Tweet: (Video) Yup it’s Mel Gibson - https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1633678232514863105

>>18491431 ‘Jesus loves you Mr Wilkie’: Hillsong pastor announces review after parliament allegations - Hillsong Church will launch an independent review of its financial structure and systems to ensure the organisation can carry out its religious mission in the wake of allegations of fraud and extravagant spending. Addressing the congregation on Sunday morning, global senior pastor Phil Dooley also revealed that 153 staff had taken voluntary redundancies in the last year, saving $9.47 million, and the church had implemented a new policy on gifts and honorariums, and changed its structures.

>>18511440 ACT DPP Shane Drumgold hires top NSW silk Mark Tedeschi KC ahead of Lehrmann inquiry - Zach Rolfe’s barrister and the crown prosecutor who put away serial killer Ivan Milat will play key roles in the upcoming independent inquiry into the handling of Brittany Higgins’ rape claim. The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions, Shane Drumgold SC, has hired Sydney silk Mark Tedeschi KC to represent him at the inquiry while Steven Whybrow SC – who represented Bruce Lehrmann at his aborted rape trial – has hired Adelaide silk David Edwardson KC.

>>18517111 ‘Outraged’: Bruce Lehrmann breaks silence in the witness box - Speaking publicly for the first time since allegations of rape were made against him, former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has given evidence he was “outraged” after media outlets began reporting the allegations by Brittany Higgins, although he had not been named. Mr Lehrmann said he wanted to commence defamation proceedings, but was advised by his then lawyer to wait until the resolution of criminal proceedings.

>>18517144 ‘ISIS bride’ Mariam Raad fronts court charged with travelling to declared zone - Prosecutors are gathering financial records and scouring mobile devices for messages to prove that the wife of ISIS’s star Australian recruiter willingly entered a declared area, now confirmed as being the terrorist group’s stronghold Raqqa, in Syria. Police allege Ms Raad, who has four children by maths teacher turned ISIS recruiter Muhammad Zahab, travelled to Syria willingly in 2014 and was aware of her husband‘s activities. Ms Raad along with 16 other wives and children of Australian Islamic State fighters was repatriated in October, after spending years in al-Roj Internally Displaced Persons camp near the Iraqi border.

>>18517202 328,000 IDs feared stolen in ‘sophisticated’ Latitude Financial hack - Consumer finance provider Latitude Financial said it has been the victim of a hacking incident and believes identification documents of 328,000 customers were stolen, including the driver’s licence details of about 100,000 customers. Latitude provides consumer finance services to Harvey Norman, JB Hi-Fi, The Good Guys, Apple and recently signed up David Jones. The company declined to say if consumers who are using financing from these companies are impacted.

>>18517224 Queensland to ban Nazi swastika tattoos as part of crackdown on hate symbols - The Queensland government has vowed to make it illegal to display Nazi swastika tattoos as part of its ban on hate symbols that it says will be among the strongest in the country. It will join New South Wales, which has already implemented a ban on displaying the symbol, in applying the restriction to tattoos. Western Australia and Tasmania are also moving to include tattoos in their proposed bans.

>>18530552 Lehrmann shocked at judge’s secret guilty-plea comment - In his first media interview, Bruce Lehrmann has revealed the judge who presided over his trial for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins made a comment to his barrister at a secret meeting early in the trial, which Mr Lehrmann says showed a possible “apprehension of bias” against him.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670299

#28 - Part 6

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>18530599 Bruce Lehrmann trial: Balancing interests of complainants and defendants - "Understandably, many in the legal fraternity are concerned to learn that, barely five days into the rape trial of Bruce Lehrmann, ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum told Lehrmann’s defence lawyer during a secret conversation that, should his client decide to plead guilty, she would take that into ­account when sentencing. Justice McCallum is constrained in her capacity to respond to questions put to her on the issue. If she could speak freely she might say that it is entirely commonplace, and indeed necessary, to inform an accused that an early plea will result in a discount on sentence. That is not in dispute. But such conversations should occur in open court where a judge can eliminate any risk of a perception of bias by fully explaining any comments made." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18530774 Neo-Nazi group marches into pro and anti-transgender protest in Melbourne’s CBD - A female police officer was allegedly placed in a headlock while another was allegedly slapped on the neck in a clash between pro-transgender and anti-transgender activists on Saturday (March 18 2023). The rally attracted a heavy police presence in the area including officers from the public order response team and the mounted branch. The group of men, dressed in black, performed multiple Nazi salutes while holding a sign that read: “Destroy Paedo Freaks.” Among the crowd was neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell, who founded the far-right European Australia Movement.

>>18530856 Soldiers of hate: Army investigates neo-Nazis in its ranks - "The Australian Army has launched an urgent investigation after discovering serving soldiers have links to neo-Nazi groups. The inquiry was triggered by an investigation by this masthead into white supremacist groups which features leaked recordings and conversations from encrypted forums that reveal an emerging cohort of Australian extremist leaders seeking to access firearms and ridiculing law enforcement." - Nick McKenzie - theage.com.au

>>18537925 Texts reveal Bruce Lehrmann sought ‘gear’ to ‘get lit’ on night of Brittany Higgins TV interview - Bruce Lehrmann texted a friend asking “got any gear” on the night Brittany Higgins appeared on television making her rape allegations, according to a trove of messages and documents released by the Federal Court.

>>18538063 Neo-Nazi salutes at protest could prompt changes to anti-vilification laws - The Victorian laws that ban displaying the swastika might be toughened after a group performed Nazi salutes on the steps of Parliament House

>>18543718 Victoria to ban Nazi salutes after far-right rally - Victoria will strengthen its anti-vilification laws to ban the Nazi salute following a far-right protest at Parliament House. Attorney-General Jaclyn Symes confirmed the move on Monday morning, condemning the behaviour at the protest as “disgraceful and cowardly”. “It’s clear this symbol is being used to incite hatred, not just towards Jewish people but our LGBTIQ+ community and other minority groups,” she said.

>>18543758 Deeming vows to fight ‘unjust’ move to expel her from Liberal Party - Liberal MP Moira Deeming has vowed to fight Opposition Leader John Pesutto’s push to expel her from the parliamentary party and welcomed the government’s commitment to ban the Nazi salute. Addressing the saga that could lead to her expulsion from the party room, the upper house MP condemned the neo-Nazis who she says crashed the Let Women Speak rally organised by British anti-trans rights campaigner Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull.

>>18544011 Latitude cyber attack: Passport copies stolen, historical customers affected, trading suspended - Latitude Financial has confirmed a cyber attack in which almost 330,000 identification documents were stolen, has affected historical customers – and a number of copies of passports and Medicare cards have been exposed. The attack has resulted in the theft of about 315,000 copies of driver's licences being stolen, about 10,000 copies of passports and about 3000 copies of Medicare numbers, according to an update by the company.

>>18550892 In the aftermath of a bitter protest, only one group is happy - What most people saw when they watched the chaotic events on the steps of Parliament House was a group of neo-Nazis engaging in an act of self-promotion by spreading hate on the highest profile stage they could find. But on the channels of the National Socialist Network, the group of about 20 black-clad and mostly masked Hitler saluting neo-Nazis imagined themselves as a “vanguard”, forming a “wall” on Spring Street to protect a group of women who were protesting against transgender rights.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670302

#28 - Part 7

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>18550923 Deeming vows to fight move to expel her from party room - Deeming last year won preselection for a safe spot on the Western Metropolitan Region upper house ticket, with the backing of the “Moderate” faction of the Liberal Party. Her views on transgender rights have been well canvassed since her preselection, but Deeming insists that the values espoused at the Let Women Speak event were mainstream and global. She said she was horrified to see masked men inside the buffer zone, and thought they were going to attack her, adding she “completely rejected” the beliefs of the National Socialist Network.

>>18550954 The case against anti-trans Liberal MP Moira Deeming - Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto has released a 15-page letter on why he believes rebel MP Moira Deeming should be dumped from the party, alleging she has associated with people who have expressed far right views, including sharing a platform with an activist who he claims advocated for a “white ethno state”.

>>18550964 ‘I’m no Nazi; just public enemy No. 1’, says transgender law critic - British transgender laws critic Kellie-Jay Keen has denied any links with “sad, pathetic” neo-Nazis, defended “courageous” Victorian MP Moira Deeming and blamed police and trans activists for ugly scenes at her rallies. Mrs Keen, speaking to The Australian after her Hobart rally was overrun by hostile transgender rights activists, said it was “bonkers” she had become “public enemy No. 1” in Australia and New Zealand.

>>18550996 AFP freezing assets as hunt for dirty money goes global - The Australian Federal Police has succeeded in freezing assets of drug-smugglers, money-launderers and gangsters in 11 countries as the hunt for dirty money goes global. Houses, apartments, cash, bank accounts and expensive cars have been restrained across Asia, ­Europe, the Middle East and North America, as the AFP works with law enforcement partners to target crime profits hidden overseas.

>>18558169 ‘Incorrect interpretation’: AFL says fans welcome to wave Israeli flag - The AFL has clarified that fans are entitled to display national flags at matches, and apologised for the confusion that followed after an Israeli flag was flown at Marvel Stadium. The clarification came after the national flag was flown last weekend in celebration of North Melbourne player Harry Sheezel’s stunning debut at Saturday’s clash against West Coast. It resulted in confusion about what is permitted to be shown at venues under conditions of entry. “For clarity, the AFL has no issue with the flag and signs supporting North Melbourne’s Harry Sheezel on the weekend,” a statement released by the AFL said. “We want fans to celebrate their clubs and players, and if that includes displaying national flags that amplify any of their team’s player heritage then the AFL is fully supportive.”

>>18558276 Marine Rotational Force – Darwin 2023 begins - The advance party for this year’s rotation of United States Marines have arrived in the Northern Territory. This is the 12th iteration of Marine Rotational Force – Darwin (MRF-D). Over the next seven months, up to 2500 Marines will conduct combined training exercises with their Australian Defence Force counterparts, as well as with regional partner nations. The rotation will enhance the capabilities, interoperability and readiness of the ADF and the United States Marine Corps and is a significant part of the United States Force Posture Initiatives, a hallmark of Australia’s Alliance with the US.

>>18558303 Defence Australia Tweet: Welcome back! US Marines have begun arriving in the NT for this year’s Marine Rotational Force – Darwin. Working with #YourADF, they will conduct training activities to deepen interoperability and better position our forces to respond to contingencies in the region. @MrfDarwin

>>18564973 Video: Senator Lidia Thorpe thrown to the ground while trying to interrupt anti-trans rally - The incident happened as Senator Thorpe tried to interrupt a rally by Kellie-Jay “Posy” Keen on Thursday afternoon, following similar demonstrations in Melbourne and Tasmania. In footage shared online, the independent senator – draped in an Aboriginal flag – was pushed to the ground by police as she attempted to crawl away.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670304

#28 - Part 8

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>18564992 Video: Senator Lidia Thorpe clashes with police at anti-trans rally - Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said he is seeking urgent advice from the commissioner of the Australian Federal Police after independent senator Lidia Thorpe was tackled by an officer after trying to confront an anti-trans rally outside Parliament House. Dreyfus said the footage of Thorpe going to the ground after being grabbed by a police officer on the parliament lawn was “concerning”, while Thorpe’s former Greens’ colleagues have also sought a briefing from police as soon as possible about the clash.

>>18565002 Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer a no-show in defamation case - A judge has questioned why Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer will not give evidence in his defamation case against media outlets as previously foreshadowed, suggesting he could draw an inference that the lawyer’s evidence would not assist Mr Lehrmann.

>>18565084 Video: Australian troops undergo live-fire exercise with new Boxer vehicle at Wide Bay Training Area - Weighing in at 36 tonnes, with a top speed of 105 kilometres per hour and equipped with a 30-millimetre automatic cannon – the Australian Army's latest asset, the Boxer, has been put to the test at a military exercise north of Brisbane. This week's exercise has been held in preparation for the ADF's largest bilateral training exercise with the US military, Exercise Talisman Sabre, which will begin in July.

>>18565084 Talisman Sabre - MAGIC SWORD - https://qanon.pub/?q=Operation%20Specialists - https://qanon.pub/?q=magic

>>18572111 Senior neo-Nazi slips out of Australia to fight Russian army - A senior Australian neo-Nazi linked to an international terror group has gone to fight in Ukraine amid efforts by security services to stop domestic extremists gaining overseas military training. Daniel Newman, a violent criminal with deep links to neo-Nazi leaders in NSW and Victoria and overseas terror outfit Combat 18, flew to Asia this month before then travelling to Ukraine, after telling associates he intended to take up arms with anti-Russian fighters.

>>18572187 Video: US Marines arrive in Darwin for ‘high-end live fire’ exercises - More than 2000 US Marines have landed in the Top End for seven months of training with Australian troops. Find out how it will benefit both nations. The latest rotation of US Marines has touched down in Darwin as they prepare to join Australian soldiers in training in “humanitarian assistance, security operations, and high-end live fire exercises”. The 2500 member strong Marine Rotational Force - Darwin will spend the next seven months working closely with their Australian counterparts as well as other partner nations from around the region.

>>18572187 Marine Rotational Force – Darwin Tweet: #OurMarines and sailors with @MRFDarwin arrive in the NT welcomed by our ADF #AlliesandPartners

>>18582928 Labor rules from shore to shore as Liberals brace for by-elections - Chris Minns’s thumping NSW election victory is the final nail in the coffin of the Liberals and Nationals on the mainland, and puts an exclamation mark on Labor’s political dominance over the Coalition. A devastating and predicted collapse in support for Dominic Perrottet’s government after 12-years of Coalition rule means Labor now controls eight of nine federal, state and territory governments.

>>18587912 Video: Barack and Michelle Obama tour Sydney ahead of speaking tour - Former US president Barack Obama and his wife Michelle met with prime minister Anthony Albanese to talk about the global economy before the pair toured Sydney. Albanese said he and Obama had a "very positive meeting" where they discussed the invasion of Ukraine and the global supply constraints.

>>18587918 Anthony Albanese Tweet: Honoured to welcome President @BarackObama to Sydney.

>>18587932 video: Barack Obama in line for $1 million payday on speaking tour - Barack Obama is potentially in line for a $1 million payday as he kicks off a whirlwind tour of Australia that has already included an off-the-record audience with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Kirribilli House. Mr Obama has been sighted being whisked around town in what one witness called a “20 vehicle motorcade” complete with “helicopter hovering overhead” during his first visit to Australia since 2018. While here, he will deliver two speeches in conversation with former Foreign Minister Julie Bishop to sold out audiences paying as much as $495 for the privilege.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670308

#28 - Part 9

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>18587950 Q Post #4645 - What happens if 44 is actively running a shadow command and control [shadow presidency] operation against the current duly elected POTUS?...Importance of controlled MSM [propaganda][what you see is not true _ what we say is true not what you see]? Importance of controlling the narrative? All assets deployed. Nothing to lose. Treason. Sedition. Conspiracy. Information warfare. Irregular warfare. Insurgency. Infiltration not invasion. Clear and present danger to the United States of America. THE SHADOW PRESIDENCY OF 44 - PREVENTION OF POWER RETURNING TO THE PEOPLE. POWER. CONTROL. PREVENTION OF ACCOUNTABILITY. PREVENTION OF TRANSPARANCY. WAR. A CRITICAL MOMENT IN TIME. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4645

>>18588348 Video: Putin accuses Australia of joining a military ‘axis’ as part of a ‘global NATO’ - Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused Australia of joining a new global “axis” with the United States and NATO that he said bears resemblance to the World War II alliance between Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and imperial Japan. In the interview on Russian TV channel Rossiya-24 on Sunday night, Putin named Australia, New Zealand and South Korea as being in line to join a “global NATO” and referenced a defence agreement signed by Britain and Japan earlier this year.

>>18588366 Latitude Financial hack: 14 million customer documents stolen - Latitude Financial has revealed that more than 14 million customer records have been stolen in a cyber breach, with legacy customers dating back as far as 2005 caught up in the attack. The ASX-listed credit card and loan provider on Monday reported that 7.9 million Australian and New Zealand driver’s licence numbers had been stolen, as well as 6.1 million records, 53,000 passport numbers and under 100 customer financial statements. Latitude chief executive Ahmed Fahour said the update was “hugely disappointing” and that his staff were still working around the clock to mitigate risks.

>>18588370 Victorian Liberals agree to suspend controversial MP Moira Deeming - The Victorian Liberal Party has reportedly suspended MP Moira Deeming for nine months. In a sharp blow to leader John Pesutto’s authority, his colleagues did not back the expulsion of Ms Deeming. A marathon two hour-plus party room meeting failed to back their leader and instead imposed a qualified sanction, sources said. Ms Deeming, who represents the Western Metropolitan region, faced the party room axe after appearing at a Let Women Speak rally which was also attended by neo-Nazis.

>>18588375 ‘A huge result’: Legalise Cannabis likely to win NSW upper house seat - Legalise Cannabis is confident of winning its first seat in the NSW upper house, after early counting suggests it outpolled the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers and rivalled One Nation in its popularity among voters.

>>18594089 Adelaide man arrested for allegedly sharing Christchurch massacre footage online - Police allege the 53-year-old from Edwardstown posted an online link to footage "related to the Christchurch shooting". The man has since been charged with distributing extremist material and has been bailed to appear in the Adelaide Magistrates Court on June 2.

>>18600033 Video: Suspected Russian spy Marina Sologub will fight deportation from Australia - An Irishwoman detained in Australia on suspicions she was a Russian spy will appeal against the federal government’s decision to revoke her visa and deport her. Marina Sologub, a Kazakhstan-born Irish citizen, is in immigration detention in Melbourne pending an appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal listed for July.

>>18600058 Obama warns about dangers of AI, polarisation and Murdoch at Sydney event - Former US president Barack Obama warned of the truth-warping dangers of artificial intelligence and polarised media, and took a swipe at News Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch, in a wide-ranging discussion before a Sydney audience that also canvassed China, Russian President Vladimir Putin and economic justice.

>>18600089 Video: Former US President Barack Obama arrives in Melbourne ahead of speaking tour - The 44th president of the United States is continuing his whirlwind trip to Australia as part of his sold-out speaking tour. Tickets for the Melbourne event have sold out, with prices ranging from $195 for a standard seat to a whopping $895 for “platinum” bookings. For the biggest Obama fans, purchasing a “platinum package” gets the ticket holder a welcome cocktail at a one-hour drinks function, a commemorative lanyard and a signed copy of Mr Obama’s book.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670309

#28 - Part 10

Australian Politics and Society - Part 10

>>18600098 ‘Nation first’ laws ban Nazi salute -unless you are an artist, teacher or actor behaving ‘reasonably’ - Artists including comedians and actors, as well as educators, may still be able to display Nazi symbols and perform Nazi salutes under new Tasmanian laws, if acting in “good faith”. A Tasmanian Liberal government bill to ban displays of Nazi symbols introduced on Wednesday was extended to include the salute, after neo-Nazis used the gesture at a recent Melbourne rally against transgender reforms.

>>18600185 Hillsong founder Brian Houston charged with drink-driving prior to resignation from megachurch - Former Hillsong pastor Brian Houston was busted drink-driving in the United States in the weeks before his resignation last year from the global megachurch he founded. Court records obtained by News Corp show Mr Houston was charged in Orange County, California for driving over the legal blood alcohol limit of 0.08 per cent. He was also hit with a further charge for failing to display both front and rear number plates on his vehicle.

>>18606695 Queensland is set to have 'the strongest hate crime laws in the country' - The public display of hate symbols, like Nazi flags, will be banned in Queensland under proposed legislation introduced into parliament by the state government today. Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk said there was no room for hateful ideologies, after several recent anti-Semitic incidents in Brisbane.

>>18606748 Video: Obama tour organisers apologise for dumping Indigenous elder - The organisers of former US president Barack Obama’s speaking tour have apologised to Wurundjeri elder Aunty Joy Murphy after she was dropped from his speaking event in Melbourne on Wednesday evening. Murphy, who worked with business events provider Growth Faculty for weeks to give a Welcome to Country for Wednesday’s event, was told she couldn’t bring a support person with her and that she was “too difficult” before being removed from proceedings, her representatives said.

>>18606751 Video: Former US President Barack Obama says gun laws biggest regret at Melbourne event - Days after the latest US school shooting, former president Barack Obama has lamented his inability to overhaul gun laws. Speaking in Melbourne, Mr Obama said his failure to overcome the United States’ powerful gun lobby was the lowest point in his presidency.

>>18606755 AFP, DPP told to produce material for Board of Inquiry into Lehrmann rape case - The Australian Federal Police has been reprimanded for failing to hand over “crucial” material to the board of inquiry into the handling of Bruce Lehrmann’s dropped rape charge. Just weeks out from the first public hearing, Walter Sofronoff KC, who is conducting the inquiry, has directed the AFP and the ACT’s Director of Public Prosecutions to produce material requested in subpoenas or explain their legal basis for withholding it.

>>18613189 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post: Welcome Back! Royal Australian Air Force Base Darwin, NT, Australia (Mar. 26, 2023) - Col. Brendan Sullivan, Commanding Officer of Marine Rotational Force Darwin, is welcomed to Australia by Captain Mitchell Livingstone, Commanding Officer Headquarters Northern Command, to commence the 12th iteration of the rotation. MRF-D is focused on increasing interoperability with Allies and partners in the region to promote a stable and secure Indo-Pacific. #usmc #YourADF #AlliesandPartners

>>18621910 Labor's Mary Doyle snatches historic victory in Aston by-election in Melbourne's outer east - It is the first time in more than a century that a government has won a seat from the opposition at a by-election. Liberal candidate Roshena Campbell called Ms Doyle on Saturday evening to concede defeat, while Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called Ms Doyle to congratulate her. The result is considered a devastating blow for the federal Liberal Party, which now only holds three suburban Melbourne seats. Former Liberal strategist Tony Barry called the result "cataclysmically bad" for the Liberal Party.

>>18625372 NSW Labor unable to form majority as Liberals retain Terrigal, Holsworthy - Labor will lead NSW with a minority government after the tallying of thousands of postal votes on Saturday confirmed two key seats had been retained by the Liberals. The counting of ballots received by mail in Terrigal, on the Central Coast, and Holsworthy, in Sydney’s south-west, confirmed both seats would remain Liberal held, meaning Premier Chris Minns’ government cannot win the 47 seats required for a majority.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670310

#28 - Part 11

Australian Politics and Society - Part 11

>>18625638 NT Government has asked Police Commissioner Jamie Chalker to resign - The Territory government has asked Police Commissioner Jamie Chalker to resign ahead of the top cop’s planned Easter leave. Sky News revealed the government contacted the NT Police chief executive on Friday and indicated it had lost confidence in him. Mr Chalker has taken about two weeks’ leave but he is not expected to return to his position.

>>18625673 Turnbull takes on Murdoch's Australian media empire - Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has accused Murdoch's media empire of undermining democracy, and says a rigorous inquiry into Murdoch's News Corp is needed in the wake of a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News in the U.S.

>>18631287 Video: Tomahawk brawl turns quiet Darwin suburb into ‘war zone’ - Afrodite Larentzou feels imprisoned in her Darwin home after a pitched battle between warring families erupted in broad daylight outside her apartment on Friday afternoon. More than a dozen men and women, with their children watching on, ran at each other in the suburban street wielding tomahawk axes and other makeshift weapons. The single mother who lives alone with her two daughters – a six-month-old and a 14-year-old – is deeply afraid of speaking out after witnessing what she says was an “attempted murder”. Video footage of the attack emerged as Northern Territory Chief Minister Natasha Fyles told The Australian she did not believe knife crime had “taken a hold”, but believed the issues plaguing the Territory could be overcome.

>>18644367 'Operation Cookie Monster': AFP joins FBI in seizure of online cybercrime forum - The FBI has seized a popular cybercrime online forum accused of facilitating large-scale identity theft, and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) may already be swooping on criminals in Australia. According to an FBI notice posted to the site today, the bureau seized the web domains of Genesis Market, an invitation-only crime forum that sells login information stolen from hundreds of thousands of computers. An AFP spokesperson told 9news.com.au "the AFP and partners are conducting operational activity today as part of an ongoing global cybercrime operation".

>>18644395 Justice Adam Kimber rules AN0M app was not ‘intercepting’ messages, but enabled legal police surveillance - The encrypted communication platform at the heart of an international police operation that led to hundreds of arrests and the dismantling of alleged organised crime syndicates was legally run by police, a court has ruled. Phones with the AN0M app installed were used by thousands of people in Australia who police allege were using the devices to further criminal activities. The devices were secretly being monitored by the FBI and Australian Federal Police who, on June 8, 2021, disabled the app and moved to arrest hundreds of people across the globe. In Australia the crackdown was known as Operation Ironside, in the US as Trojan Shield and in Europe as Greenlight. On Wednesday April 5, Justice Adam Kimber, who has heard months of evidence as part of the nation leading Ironside test case, found the phones did not allow the AFP to illegally intercept phone communications.

>>18653903 Bruce Lehrmann targets ABC over Higgins and Tame’s Press Club address - Former federal Liberal political staffer Bruce Lehrmann is suing the ABC for defamation for broadcasting a National Press Club address last year by Grace Tame and Brittany Higgins, in a case expected to test the defences available for live broadcasts. Lehrmann filed Federal Court defamation proceedings against the ABC on Wednesday. Documents released by the court on Thursday reveal he is suing over the National Press Club address on February 9 last year, which was televised by the national broadcaster, and a related YouTube video. He says the broadcasts conveyed the defamatory meaning that he “raped Brittany Higgins on a couch in Parliament House”. He denies the rape allegation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670315

#28 - Part 12

Australian Politics and Society - Part 12

>>18653925 ‘Operation Cookie Monster’: Australians arrested in international cybercrime sting - A sprawling stolen ID marketplace selling some 80 million credentials and popular with cybercriminals has been shut down by a multinational police operation that arrested 120 people, among them 10 Australians. “Operation Cookie Monster” spanned 17 countries, conducted more than 200 searches and culminated with police defacing the Genesis Market website, plastering the logos of European, Canadian and Australian police forces, and that of cybersecurity firm Qintel, across the page. Britain’s National Crime Agency said it was “one of the most significant access marketplaces anywhere in the world”. The US Treasury Department called it “one of the most prominent brokers of stolen credentials and other sensitive information”. AFP Assistant Commissioner Scott Lee warned police action would continue around the country as AFP and State and Territory investigators had identified additional alleged offenders. “Don’t think that because we haven’t knocked on your door yet, we won’t be at all. If you have used this website to purchase stolen data to commit cybercrime or fraud offences then we will find you and we will be paying you a visit.”

>>18653940 Bruce Lehrmann lawyer asked cops to investigate Brittany Higgins over ‘falsified evidence’ - Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer wrote to police during his rape trial last year seeking that Brittany Higgins be investigated over matters arising from the trial, including allegations that she falsified and destroyed evidence, fabricated a photo of a bruise on her leg and publicly called into question the evidence of a witness while the trial was still under way.

>>18654271 Australian Federal Police under investigation over forwarding of protected information about Brittany Higgins - Australia’s national anti-corruption watchdog has launched a probe into whether police “attempted to pervert the course of justice” by forwarding protected information about Brittany Higgins to the defence team during the aborted rape trial and pressuring her not to proceed with the matter.

>>18660041 New Batch of Classified Documents Appears on Social Media Sites - A new batch of classified documents that appear to detail American national security secrets from Ukraine to the Middle East to China surfaced on social media sites on Friday, alarming the Pentagon and adding turmoil to a situation that seemed to have caught the Biden administration off guard. A senior intelligence official called the leak “a nightmare for the Five Eyes,” in a reference to the United States, Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, the so-called Five Eyes nations that broadly share intelligence.

>>18660098 Army readies for record-setting logistics exercise in Pacific - The U.S. Army is preparing to put its logistics tail to the test in the Indo-Pacific, considered the most challenging operational theater in the world by service officials. This summer, the service will hold a large-scale exercise in Australia dubbed Talisman Sabre. As part of the two-week training event that starts in late July, the Army will deliver massive amounts of equipment across challenging terrain and large distances, Brig. Gen. Jered Helwig, the Army’s 8th Theater Sustainment Command commander, told Defense News.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670319

#28 - Part 13

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>18427785 Australia should not buy British nuclear subs: Dutton - Peter Dutton has declared Australia should not buy a British nuclear submarine in comments branded as “irresponsible” by the Albanese government - The Opposition Leader said a British boat would be plagued by problems, and the government should choose the “proven” US Virginia-class sub.

>>18454173 U.S. NAVY SUBMARINE VISITS PERTH, WESTERN AUSTRALIA - United States Navy submarine USS Asheville is visiting Perth, Western Australia for combined training exercises with Royal Australian Navy submarine forces as part of a regularly scheduled patrol in the Indo-Pacific region - The Los Angeles-class fast attack submarine docked at HMAS Stirling Naval Base on Garden Island, near Rockingham - USS Asheville’s Commanding Officer Commander Thomas Dixon said crewmembers were eager to work with their Australian allies - “Australia has no closer friend than the United States. Together, we are deterring aggression and ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific region,” Cmdr. Dixon said.

>>18460391 Albanese to cement submarines deal in US next week - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will mark the next stage of the AUKUS pact at a meeting in San Diego with United States President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, revealing the likely submarine choice for a project expected to cost at least $100 billion.

>>18472462 Australia expected to buy up to 5 Virginia class submarines as part of AUKUS - Australia is expected to buy up to five U.S. Virginia class nuclear powered submarines in the 2030's as part of a landmark defense agreement between Washington, Canberra and London, in a deal that would present a new challenge to China.

>>18472486 Australia to Buy U.S. Nuclear-Powered Submarines in Naval Expansion - The U.S. will speed up Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines by arranging for Canberra’s first few subs to be built in the U.S. - The arrangement is part of a multifaceted plan to be announced Monday in San Diego at a meeting attended by President Biden, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. The plan to sell up to five U.S. Virginia-class submarines to Australia is intended as a stopgap to provide the country with nuclear-powered subs by the mid-2030s.

>>18472507 Aukus submarine deal: Australia expected to choose UK design, sources say - An enthusiastic Rishi Sunak has told ministers to expect a positive outcome next week when he travels to San Diego to unveil a deal to supply nuclear-powered submarines to Australia as part of the Aukus pact with the US. Multiple sources said they believed the UK had succeeded in its bid to sell British-designed nuclear submarines to Australia, a deal that will safeguard the long-term future of the shipyard at Barrow-in-Furness.

>>18472515 Australia ‘set for two types of nuclear submarines’ - Leaks from both sides of the Atlantic suggest Australia will buy not one but two types of nuclear submarine – the US-designed Virginia-class and a future British-designed sub – in an acquisition plan set to cost hundreds of billions of dollars and run for at least 40 years.

>>18472545 AUKUS submarine plan is high risk, high reward - "The expected decision to purchase three to five US Virginia Class submarines ahead of building a next-generation submarine in Adelaide is the Albanese government’s long-term answer to the challenge of a rising China. This two-stage Aukus submarine plan would amount to a generational transformation of Australia’s future submarine capability. But the risks are high and the lesson of history is that enterprises like this are never smooth sailing." - Cameron Stewart - theaustralian.com.au

>>18472561 Video: Albanese government and Coalition recognise Scott Morrison's 'vision' and praise former PM for AUKUS involvement ahead of nuclear submarine announcement - Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton have heaped praised on Scott Morrison amid a major advancement in the progress of the AUKUS alliance.

>>18478626 Analysis: Nuclear submarine plan aims to give Australia strategic edge to deter China - Australian nuclear submarines are key to defending the country's 36,000 kilometres of coastline and maintaining an edge against China, whose growing military presence means conflict can erupt without notice, defence officials and government advisers said. The shift from Australia's diesel-electric fleet to nuclear-powered subs brings additional range, stealth and strike capability - crucial capabilities given Canberra's reliance on sea cargo for trade, and undersea cables for telecommunications.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670324

#28 - Part 14

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>18478650 AUKUS nuclear plan torpedoes Collins subs upgrade - Richard Marles has warned Australia’s Collins-class submarine capability will become questionable by the mid-2030s, casting doubt on the boats’ planned $6bn-$10bn life extension as the government looks to acquire US-built nuclear subs from early next decade.

>>18478671 Nation’s challenge: how to deliver on AUKUS - "Next week in the US, Anthony Albanese will make the most consequential national security announcement of his prime ministership – revealing the agreed pathway for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines. Much broader than nuclear propulsion, the AUKUS technology-sharing agenda could potentially turn Australia into a leading strategic power in the Indo-Pacific." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

>>18478706 Canberra urged not to risk national interests to serve Washington over possible submarine deal - With the latest updates of Australia's possible purchases of five US Virgina class nuclear powered submarines being revealed by Western media in advance of the AUKUS meeting in the US, Chinese observers urged Canberra not to blindly follow Washington's strategy in containing Beijing, and risk its own national interests on economy and security only to serve Washington's interests. - Xu Keyue - globaltimes.cn

>>18478707 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on March 9, 2023 - "China has made clear its strong position on nuclear submarine cooperation between the US, the UK and Australia on multiple occasions. This trilateral cooperation constitutes serious nuclear proliferation risks, undermines the international non-proliferation system, exacerbates arms race and hurts peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific. It has been widely questioned and opposed by regional countries and the wider international community."

>>18478740 China's atomic agency envoy slams AUKUS - A Chinese envoy at the UN’s atomic energy agency, IAEA, slammed the AUKUS submarine deal as a "textbook case of nuclear proliferation" and an "unprecedented" transfer of "weapon-grade uranium". Li Song, Permanent Representative of China to UN and other International Organisations in Vienna delivered the harshest criticism against the AUKUS deal at the IAEA Board of Governors meeting yesterday. "The essence of the AUKUS nuclear submarine cooperation is the transfer of tons of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium by the United States and the United Kingdom, which are nuclear-weapon states and also the depository states of the NPT, to Australia, their military ally and a non-nuclear-weapon state, out of geopolitical and strategic security considerations," Mr Li said in a speech published by the Chinese UN mission in Vienna.

>>18478740 True Multilateralism is the Answer to Maintaining the NPT Regime - Remarks by the H.E. Ambassador LI Song at the IAEA Board of Governors meeting under agenda item 8: Transfer of the nuclear materials in the context of AUKUS and its safeguards in all aspects under the NPT - 2023-03-09

>>18484519 ‘An absolute priority’: Albanese promises AUKUS will mean jobs for Australia - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has promised the AUKUS pact on nuclear-powered submarines will deliver a significant injection of jobs for Australia, amid concerns the decision to buy up to five boats from the United States will come at the expense of domestic manufacturing.

>>18484553 Morrison reset Australian defence structure by planning AUKUS - "The argument that Australia should not have gone ahead with AUKUS to avoid upsetting France was naive. It boiled down to the national strategic interest, and here Australia and France did not necessarily align. For Morrison, the French being unable to see why Australia needed to head in a different direction reflected their lack of clarity on what the issues in the Indo-Pacific actually were." - Simon Benson and Geoff Chambers - theaustralian.com.au

>>18484597 Scott Morrison kept AUKUS secret from cabinet ministers and senior diplomats - Senior diplomats and cabinet minsters were kept in the dark over AUKUS negotiations amid concerns that plans to acquire nuclear submarines from the US and Britain would be leaked through ­Australian embassies in Europe, scuttling the landmark deal.

>>18484690 Biden’s AUKUS Point Man to Exit - James Miller, U.S. President Joe Biden’s top advisor on the trilateral AUKUS military alliance between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States is set to leave the administration soon after the leaders of the three countries meet in California next week to announce Australia’s forthcoming nuclear submarine program. Miller’s role is expected to be folded into the portfolio of Kurt Campbell, Biden’s top Asia hand at the National Security Council.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670328

#28 - Part 15

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 3

>>18484914 Japan muscles up to neighbourhood bully China - As the Albanese government prepares urgently to overhaul Australia’s defence capabilities, Canberra’s “quasi ally” in Asia is implementing its own landmark national security strategy to deter an attack by China. Late last month, Japan’s Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, announced an order for 400 US-made Tomahawk cruise missiles for delivery in the next 12 months.

>>18491283 AUKUS meeting to put Australia on track for a ’21st-century submarine fleet’ - Democrat Congressman Joe Courtney, one of America’s biggest proponents of the AUKUS deal with Australia and the United Kingdom has vowed Australia will not be getting substandard submarines despite suggestions that the vessels purchased will be rebadged Virginia-class models instead of newly built boats.

>>18491295 AUKUS submarines 'transformational' for Australia - US Congressman Joe Courtney, co-chair of Washington's "AUKUS Caucus" said the announcement was going to be a "very thoughtful product". "It's going to be a transformational enterprise for working people in Australia," he told ABC's Insiders.

>>18491321 US promises ‘no clunkers’ amid suggestion Australia may get second-hand submarines - US congressman Joe Courtney has given the clearest signal yet that Australia could receive second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the United States under the landmark AUKUS deal. “What you will get is of the highest quality. And I say that sincerely,” he said. “The shelf life of a Virginia class submarine is 33 years and it has a life-of-boat nuclear reactor, it doesn’t require refuelling. No one’s going to be foisting off clunkers on good friends and allies.”

>>18491342 Video: 'No clunkers': US Congressman says second-hand submarines for Australia are high-quality - David Speers interviews US Democrat Congressman for Connecticut, Joe Courtney, ahead of the official AUKUS nuclear submarine announcement in Washington - ABC News (Australia)

>>18497095 Anthony Albanese warns: price of AUKUS submarine security is $200bn - Australia’s nuclear submarine plan will cost more than $200bn over 30 years, create 20,000 direct Australian jobs, and be overseen by a multi-agency body in a bid to avoid the delivery problems of past Defence mega-projects. Anthony Albanese will warn taxpayers on Tuesday of the massive price tag they will face to ­acquire the “world leading” ­nuclear submarine capability when he unveils the AUKUS plan with Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak at a US naval base.

>>18497131 PM’s plane calls in on Quad squad, skirts China skies - A special flight to carry Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to a major defence announcement has highlighted Australia’s key partnerships in the region by starting in India, landing in Japan and ending in the United States. The Royal Australian Air Force planned a long route from New Delhi to a refuelling stop in Tokyo so the prime minister and his delegation would remain outside Chinese airspace.

>>18504426 Australia’s Submarine Program with U.S. and Britain Could Could Run Up to $245 Billion - Australia’s nuclear-powered submarine program with the United States and Britain will cost up to A$368 billion ($245 billion) over the next three decades, a defense official said on Tuesday, the country’s biggest single defense project in history. U.S. President Joe Biden, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Tuesday unveiled details of a plan to provide Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines, a major step to counter China’s naval build up in the Indo-Pacific.

>>18504659 China challenge ‘epoch-defining’, Rishi Sunak warns as Xi Jinping vows PLA ‘wall of steel’ - Xi Jinping has declared China will build the People’s Liberation Army into a “great wall of steel” to protect the rising giant’s “national sovereignty” on the eve of Anthony Albanese, Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak unveiling their monumental AUKUS submarine deal. British Prime Minister, Mr Sunak, warned China posed an “epoch-defining systemic challenge” as he headed to San Diego in the US to meet Mr Albanese and Mr Biden to lay out their AUKUS plans to deter an increasingly assertive Beijing.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670332

#28 - Part 16

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 4

>>18504688 Eight nuclear-powered submarines to be built in Adelaide under $368bn AUKUS deal - Australia’s journey to acquiring nuclear submarines will cost $268bn to $368bn out to mid-2050. Under the “optimal pathway” revealed by Anthony Albanese, Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, eight AUKUS-class submarines, based on a British design, will be built in Adelaide, with the first to be completed by 2042. An estimated 20,000 direct jobs will be created in Australia by the AUKUS pathway, with the bulk of the jobs in South Australia and Western Australia, to build the submarines and new infrastructure. In the interim, Australia will buy three US-made Virginia-class subs with an option of two more, with the first arriving in 2033. Up to five nuclear submarines – four US and one British – will begin rotational deployments to operate from Australia from 2027.

>>18504688 Video: AUKUS subs will be nuclear powered not 'nuclear armed' - US President Joe Biden has reassured that the AUKUS submarines will be nuclear powered, not armed, acknowledging that Australia is a “proud non-nuclear weapons state” and is committed to staying that way. President Biden stood alongside Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in San Diego, California, to outline details of the AUKUS subs deal. “These boats will not have any nuclear weapons of any kind on them,” President Biden said. “AUKUS has one overriding objective – to enhance the stability of the Indo-Pacific amid rapidly shifting global dynamics.” - Sky News Australia

>>18504733 Video: Australia begins its nuclear age as AUKUS overcomes years of submarine struggles - Australia secures rotations of US and British nuclear subs from 2027, at least three conventionally-armed Virginia class American subs in the early 2030s and in the 2040s an Australian-built nuclear-powered submarine, SSN-AUKUS, based on the British Astute class boat.

>>18504740 Albanese, Biden and Sunak’s AUKUS plan ticks many boxes, but there are plenty of unknowns - "The AUKUS submarine is a strikingly aggressive and optimistic plan which seeks to fast-track Australia’s future submarine capability as quickly as possible in the face of a rising China. The plan is hugely ambitious and commits Australia to acquiring two separate nuclear-powered submarines and creating a next generation defence industrial base in South Australia and Western Australia. However it contains many sweeping assumptions and many unknowns and will cost an eye watering $268 billion to $368 billion out until the mid-2050s." Cameron Stewart - theaustralian.com.au

>>18504744 Both sides of US politics back AUKUS path; former Trump official says submarine deal will last - Democrat and Republican congressmen have hailed Australia’s planned acquisition of nuclear-powered Virginia class US submarines as a critical step to bolstering US and Australian defences against “totalitarian aggression” in the Indo-Pacific. Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin, said the AUKUS details were critical to pushing back against “CCP aggression”, describing the announcement as “taking a critical step towards achieving these goals and demonstrates our commitment to defending the free world from totalitarian aggression”. Democrat Congressman Joe Courtney said AUKUS was “an effective, intelligent effort to deter potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific by enhancing Australia’s Navy with nuclear-powered submarines”.

>>18504751 How the subs agreement will work - The multi-stage plan begins this year, with more US nuclear submarine visits to Australia, providing a growing number of training spots for Australian submariners of increasing seniority. Australian tradespeople and professionals will also begin relocating to the US and UK this year to develop their skills and support the AUKUS’ partners’ construction schedules. Then, from 2027, up to four US and one British submarine will begin rotational deployments that will see them temporarily operating from Australia’s submarine base, at HMAS Stirling near Perth.

>>18504753 How the AUKUS submarines will work, armed with Tomahawk missiles and able to evade China - Australia will operate three of the quietest, longest-range submarines available by the late 2030s, armed with Tomahawk missiles that can hit land or maritime targets from at least 1500 km. The Virginia-class subs and subsequent AUKUS-class boats will be able to lurk quietly off China’s main submarine base at Hainan Island, or near key choke points in the East and South China Seas, able to intercept Chinese subs and surface ships or launch strikes on the Chinese mainland. Australia has never before possessed such a capability. As Richard Marles says, it will place an additional “question mark” into the strategic calculations of potential adversaries, by which he means China.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670335

#28 - Part 17

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 5

>>18504761 AUKUS submarine deal could spur Australia to becoming naval power - "These submarine announcements dare Australia to embrace greatness. If we end up with three Virginia-class nuclear submarines and eight AUKUS nuclear submarines we will, in fact, be one of the most powerful navies in the world. In the many decades I’ve been writing about submarines, this is not only the most ambitious, but the most realistic, plan to replace the Collins and upgrade our capabilities. That doesn’t guarantee it will work. But it’s a big step forward." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18504773 China warns AUKUS has made Australia a target for the People’s Liberation Army - Chinese experts have warned that Australia has “officially put itself on Beijing’s defence radar” with its $368bn plan to build nuclear powered submarines with the United States and United Kingdom. Government-linked academics and military officials said Australia’s mammoth defence acquisition was putting the country on the “frontline” of America and China’s strategic competition, which they said would worsen Canberra’s already strained relationship with its biggest trading partner.

>>18504789 In economic recovery era, US is biggest threat by trapping Australia's development interests - "When China sits down with friends, it is for peace. When the US and its partners get together, the agenda is about confrontation. Since the announcement of AUKUS 18 months ago, many observers, including those from Australia, have said the alliance, under the guise of nuclear-powered submarines cooperation, is essentially about US arming Australia and turning it into a US military asset against China, laying a timed bomb for peace and stability in the region." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18504803 Australia may 'pay expensive price' as AUKUS nuke sub deal only serves US hegemony: experts - "Australia is "planting a time bomb" for its own peace and that of the region, and it would bear the cost of the "expensive mistake" of following the US, Chinese experts warned, as the AUKUS leaders of the US, UK and Australia are expected to meet in San Diego, California and announce a mega nuclear submarine deal to arm Australia." - Wang Qi - globaltimes.cn

>>18504851 OPINION: Albanese got the subs deal spectacularly right, and can thank Scott Morrison - "AUKUS itself was the brainchild of Scott Morrison. Bold in its conception and historic in its implications, it was the direct product of close collaboration between Morrison, a very small number of his senior advisers and the leaders of Defence. From the start, the former prime minister took the hardball but necessary decision to keep the inner-circle tight, in particular by marginalising the notoriously leaky Department of Foreign Affairs. (Until shortly before the announcement, the only senior DFAT officials in the loop were Arthur Sinodinos in Washington and me in London.) The short-term damage to our relationship with France was a cost that Morrison was willing to pay to secure the much-better protection for Australia’s national security that AUKUS offered. Scott Morrison has had a rough time over the past year. In the longer perspective of history, AUKUS will be judged to be his most important legacy. It is a legacy greater than many other prime ministers have left behind them." - George Brandis, Former high commissioner to the UK and federal attorney-general - March 14, 2023

>>18504867 Morrison’s legacy will turn Australia into a significant power - "AUKUS is not just a transformational security agreement but will significantly change the direction of modern Australia. Strategically, the move to become the seventh country with nuclear-powered submarines helps to elevate Australia from an also-ran middle power, like Argentina and the Philippines, to becoming a really substantial contributor to the regional power balance, and therefore global peace. This AUKUS initiative stands in stark contrast with the opinions of those who over the decades have argued we should downgrade ties with the UK and the US. That AUKUS has been endorsed as enthusiastically by the Labor Party as it was by its founders, the Morrison government, means that the neutralist, non-aligned approach to Australian foreign policy is for all intents and purposes dead in the water. So there we have it, Scott Morrison’s great legacy. Whatever you thought of him, there’s no doubt he will be remembered in the decades ahead for one thing, and that will be AUKUS." - Alexander Downer - afr.com

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670336

#28 - Part 18

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 6

>>18510927 Fiji backs AUKUS as Canberra soothes regional tensions - One of the Pacific’s key leaders has told Anthony Albanese he supports the AUKUS agreement during a whistle-stop meeting on Wednesday as the Prime Minister continued diplomatic efforts to reassure regional anxieties over the planned acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines. Fijian PM Sitiveni Rabuka congratulated Mr Albanese on the landmark agreement and was comforted by Mr Albanese’s assurances AUKUS would not breach the Rarotonga treaty, a pact among Pacific nations including Australia to keep the South Pacific free of nuclear weapons.

>>18510950 ‘Whatever it takes’: Democrats and Republicans unite for AUKUS - Republicans and Democrats in the US Congress have thrown their weight behind the ambitious plan to help Australia acquire nuclear-powered submarines, vowing to do “what it takes” to make the AUKUS pact a success. Republican Mike Gallagher, who co-chairs Congress’ AUKUS working group alongside Democrat congressman Joe Courtney, threw his weight behind Tuesday’s announcement and plans to use his new role as a head of a special committee on China to tackle the issue of export controls. “Now we must act with urgency to not only fully resource and implement this agreement, but also make the necessary policy choices to make AUKUS as successful as possible,” he said.

>>18510974 AUKUS' final blueprint marks an 'astonishing step forward' for the West that puts our adversaries on notice - "Australian sovereignty was strengthened immeasurably this week, and we have emerged as a different nation: more confident; more determined and far more capable. The signal that it sends to potential adversaries is clear and unmistakable. We are prepared to do whatever it takes to ensure our sovereignty, and will do it with close partners and allies using the most advanced technology available anywhere on the globe." - Stephen Loosley, Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the United States Studies Centre - skynews.com.au

>>18511006 AUKUS alliance: Our $368bn, missile-packed freedom fleet of submarines - Australia will start work immediately on a historic $368bn plan to transform the nation’s defence capabilities that will ultimately ­deliver two types of nuclear-­powered submarines packed with long-range strike missiles to help counter China’s growing military expansion.

>>18511054 AUKUS compact shows Labor’s new conviction - "This is a revolutionary moment in the history of the Australian Labor Party. At this point Labor assumes full implementation responsibility at the national level for turning Australia into a nuclear-powered submarine nation irrevocably tied to the US and Britain in a strategy of deterrence against China’s ambitions in the Indo-Pacific." - Paul Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>18511070 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has reshaped AUKUS, regional power and Labor - "Anthony Albanese and his Defence Minister, Richard Marles, have delivered a national defence outcome that not so long ago would have been unthinkable for Labor. The fact this has not caused a ripple in the fabric of Labor unity on the issue says two things. China has changed the equation, even for the left." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>18511090 China is determined to thwart AUKUS, driven by distrust and fear of a US nuclear build-up - China has made no secret of its plans to diplomatically thwart Australia's AUKUS submarine plan, which it sees as part of a broader US effort to contain China's future military dominance of Asia. Beijing's mission to the United Nations yesterday slammed the announcement that Australia will obtain several American nuclear-powered submarines as part of the deal, saying it "fuels arms races and hurts peace and stability".

>>18511145 ‘Dangerous path’: China issues chilling AUKUS threat - China issued an ominous warning over the nuclear-powered submarine deal with the United Kingdom and the United States, saying the historic AUKUS pact put Australia on a “path of error and danger”. A day after it was revealed Australia would become a major naval power in the Pacific with nuclear subs bought from the US and built with the UK, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Wenbin lashed out at what he said was the proliferation of highly enriched “weapons-grade” uranium to Australia. “The three countries, for their own geopolitical interests, have totally disregarded the concerns of the international community and gone further down the wrong and dangerous path,” he said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670339

#28 - Part 19

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 7

>>18511150 Video: China says AUKUS on 'dangerous path' with nuclear subs deal - The United States, Australia and the United Kingdom are traveling “further down the wrong and dangerous path for their own geopolitical self-interest,” China's Foreign Ministry said Tuesday, responding to an agreement under which Australia will purchase nuclear-powered attack submarines from the US to modernize its fleet. FRANCE 24's International Affairs Editor Angela Diffley tells us more. - FRANCE 24 English

>>18511176 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on March 14, 2023 - "We’ve repeatedly said that the establishment of the so-called AUKUS security partnership between the US, the UK and Australia to promote cooperation on nuclear submarines and other cutting-edge military technologies is a typical Cold War mentality. It will only exacerbate arms race, undermine the international nuclear non-proliferation regime and hurt regional peace and stability."

>>18511193 China expected to prepare for AUKUS nuclear submarine program with underwater buildups - "The AUKUS collaboration will damage the global strategic balance and stability, encourage other countries to join the nuclear arms race, escalate geopolitical tensions and bring the Asia-Pacific region to a wrong path of confrontation and splitting-up, completely opposite to the common appeal for development and prosperity from countries in the region." - Liu Xuanzun - globaltimes.cn

>>18511200 Nuclear submarines will turn Australia into a ‘haunted house’: Global Times editorial - "In the English context, "white elephant" usually refers to a useless but expensive and eccentric object. It could have been better if the nuclear submarines of the US were just white elephants, but they are also a big ill omen. Canberra bought them back with a huge sum of money and will turn Australia into a haunted house, bringing risk to the whole region and making the years of efforts of South Pacific Countries in building a South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone, which is protected by formal treaty, face the most serious impact." Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18511306 AUKUS the worst international decision by a Labor government since World War I: Paul Keating - "The Albanese Government’s complicity in joining with Britain and the United States in a tripartite build of a nuclear submarine for Australia under the AUKUS arrangements represents the worst international decision by an Australian Labor government since the former Labor leader, Billy Hughes, sought to introduce conscription to augment Australian forces in World War One. Every Labor Party branch member will wince when they realise that the party we all fight for is returning to our former colonial master, Britain, to find our security in Asia – two hundred and thirty-six years after Europeans first grabbed the continent from its Indigenous people.....This week, Anthony Albanese screwed into place the last shackle in the long chain the United States has laid out to contain China. No mealy-mouthed talk of ‘stabilisation’ in our China relationship or resort to softer or polite language will disguise from the Chinese the extent and intent of our commitment to United States’s strategic hegemony in East Asia with all its deadly portents. History will be the judge of this project in the end. But I want my name clearly recorded among those who say it is a mistake. Who believe that, despite its enormous cost, it does not offer a solution to the challenge of great power competition in the region or to the security of the Australian people and its continent." - PAUL KEATING - MARCH 15, 2023

>>18511330 IN FULL: Former PM Paul Keating criticises AUKUS pact and discusses relations with China - Former prime minister Paul Keating examines the merits of the AUKUS submarine deal and its implications for China-Australia relations and regional stability. - ABC News (Australia), Mar 15 2023

>>18511362 Paul Keating calls nuclear submarines deal worst decision by Labor government since WWI conscription - Former prime minister Paul Keating has launched an extraordinary attack on the Albanese government over its adoption of the AUKUS pact, accusing it of making the worst foreign policy decision by a Labor government since the attempted introduction of conscription in World War I. Keating singled out Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minster Richard Marles for strident criticism, accusing them of setting Australia down a “dangerous path” by deepening ties with its closest security allies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670344

#28 - Part 20

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 8

>>18511405 Former prime minister Paul Keating accused of ‘gaslighting’ CCP victims - Human rights experts have accused Paul Keating of “regurgitating Chinese Communist Party talking points” and “gaslighting” victims after he claimed Beijing’s abhorrent treatment of Uighurs was in “dispute”. The former Labor prime minister launched a fiery tirade against the Albanese Government, the AUKUS pact and journalists who questioned his unwavering defence of China during a National Press Club address on Wednesday. “There’s disputes about what the nature of the Chinese affront to the Uighurs are,” he said when asked if he would condemn the CCP for its treatment of the persecuted minority. Mr Keating then deflected by arguing there should be more criticism of human rights issues in India, and Australia’s record of Indigenous deaths in custody.

>>18516899 Paul Keating AUKUS rhetoric a relic of past bitterness - "On AUKUS, and on China, Paul Keating attacks Anthony Albanese not from the left, nor from the right, but from the past. It’s not even the past of the Hawke/Keating governments of the 1980s and ’90s, which were responsible and proactive on national security. Keating’s rambling critiques today hark back instead to the Labor culture of the 1970s, when ideological anti-Americanism, and chip-on-the-shoulder hostility to Britain, dominated Labor culture. This rhetoric is fossilised, an antique, a survivor on the Noah’s ark of Labor resentments and bitterness long since laid to rest by modern leaders." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18516925 Keating’s views ‘belong to another time’: Albanese, Wong fire back over AUKUS - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has accused Paul Keating of diminishing himself by attacking the federal government’s most senior cabinet ministers, saying he “fundamentally disagreed” with his predecessor’s views on modern China and the AUKUS partnership with the United States and United Kingdom.

>>18516946 Video: Paul Keating's AUKUS criticism will sting for Labor's most senior ministers but it won't stop the submarines deal - The AUKUS submarines are years from hitting the water but have already claimed their first victim. The relationship between the Labor government and the party's elder statesman Paul Keating has been sunk. In truth, it was already listing badly over this issue, but now it's irrevocably ruptured.

>>18516979 Video: Malcolm Turnbull joins Paul Keating in smashing AUKUS nuclear subs deal: Ex-PM doubts 'sick' United Kingdom can hold up its end of the bargain - Malcolm Turnbull has become the second former prime minister in as many days to slam the government's historic AUKUS nuclear submarines deal. Mr Turnbull apologised on ABC Radio for not being able to 'express his concerns as colourfully as Paul's', before going on to also savage the deal. 'The reality is this will take a lot more time, cost a great deal more money - have a lot more risk and cost a lot more money than if we had proceeded with the submarine project we had with France, that Morrison recklessly cancelled,' he said.

>>18517002 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on March 15, 2023 - "China urges the US, the UK and Australia to earnestly fulfill their non-proliferation obligations and refrain from undermining the authority and efficacy of the IAEA’s safeguards system. We also urge the IAEA Secretariat to perform its duties in strict accordance with its mandate and not to endorse the act of nuclear proliferation by the three countries."

>>18517043 Global Times Tweet: Video: @SkyNewsAust at the National Press Club on Wed: "What makes you so sure #China isn't a military threat to Australia? Former #Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating: “Because I've got a brain, principally, and I can think.” #AUKUS #auspol

>>18517076 AUKUS submarine deal: Green light for first nuclear waste storage repository in Sandy Ridge, Western Australia - Australia’s first purpose-built low-level radioactive waste facility has been granted final approval in Western Australia to start dealing with the nation’s massive stockpile of hazardous nuclear medicine, mining and other industrial waste that is spread across the country. With the federal government confirming it would need to establish a future high-level nuclear waste facility to deal with reactor fuel from the AUKUS nuclear submarine program, questions have been raised about the growing stockpiles of lower-level radioactive waste currently stored in more than 100 facilities across the country.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670351

#28 - Part 21

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 9

>>18523487 Vice-Admiral Jonathan Mead, head of the Nuclear Powered Submarine Taskforce, hit back at critics of the AUKUS nuclear submarine plan - The head of the Nuclear Powered Submarine Taskforce has hit back at critics of the AUKUS plan, revealing it was always a bedrock requirement that nuclear submarines be built in Australia, thereby ruling out any option to buy the whole fleet from overseas. Vice-Admiral Jonathan Mead was responding to questions from strategic analysts in the US and Australia about why Australia did not choose to buy a whole fleet of Virginia-class submarines rather than also build a separate AUKUS boat that will create two types of nuclear submarines. Vice-Admiral Mead said the option of building the Virginia-class submarines in Australia was also not feasible because the Virginia production line in the US was scheduled to end in 2043, which would be around the time that Australia would be starting its own construction of nuclear-powered boats.

>>18523508 Nuclear-powered submarines leave diesel craft in their wake - "When we compare nuclear powered and conventional submarines, we tend to focus on speed, endurance, stealth and so-called impactful projection. Over the course of my career I have commanded both a diesel submarine (SSK) and a conventionally armed nuclear submarine (SSN) on Cold War patrols. There has been much commentary from self-proclaimed “experts” on the decision to acquire SSNs through the AUKUS accord, including former prime ministers. Having commanded both types of submarine, I have some reflections that might contribute to the current debate, one is that the SSK and the SSN are like chalk and cheese." - Peter Clarke, retired Rear Admiral from the Royal Australian Navy. He served in Britain’s Royal Navy before migrating to Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18523526 AUKUS: The pillars of Hercules - "AUKUS is Herculean in scale, complexity, and concept. But rather than connecting the waters of the Atlantic and the Mediterranean, as Hercules did, it unites the Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific in one of the most ambitious and demanding endeavours I have seen in my life, for Australia to acquire conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines. To deter, Australia must be credible. Credibility rests on coherence, cohesion, commitment, capability, and clear communication. The partnership with the United States and United Kingdom through AUKUS is the hard-headed response of three nations that share heritage, embrace and avow common principles, institutional resilience and rigorous accountability, possess complementary skills and capabilities, and are intent on meeting common challenges. For Australia this is a nation-building task which should excite something we have never really done in my lifetime, namely, engage in serious, thoughtful, dispassionate and self-confident national discourse about what we value and wish to preserve, what must change, and at what cost (not just financial), if we are to become and remain the Australia we wish to be. The world cannot be willed into more benign shape if we just squeeze our eyes shut tightly enough and wish it were so." - Peter Tesch, Deputy Secretary for Strategy, Policy, and Industry in the Department of Defence from 2019 to 2022, Ambassador to the Russian Federation (2016–19), Ambassador to Germany (2009–13), and head of the International Security Division (2014–15). - lowyinstitute.org

>>18523557 ‘Understand me’: Hun Sen links AUKUS to concerns for Cambodia’s Chinese-funded naval base - Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has aired concerns about the transparency of Australia’s submarine ambitions during a rambling speech in which he also accepted they would be nuclear-powered and not nuclear armed. The strongman also linked the AUKUS announcement to Australian distrust over a controversial Chinese-funded naval base in his country.

>>18523587 Keating ignores genocide to defend his ‘China fantasy’ - "In an interview at the National Press Club, former prime minister Paul Keating, was asked about the internment of the Uighurs in the Chinese region of Xinjiang. Journalist Matthew Knott asked Keating if he could turn his characteristic invective against the CCP for its treatment of the Uighurs, to which Keating replied “there are disputes about what the nature of the Chinese affront to the Uighurs are” and “what if the Chinese said … what about deaths in custody of Aboriginal people in your prison system. Wouldn’t that be a valid point for them?” In reality, there’s a large body of evidence available detailing the Chinese “affront” to the Uighurs in Xinjiang, from aerial photos of detention centres, to witness testimonies of systematic torture and rape, to demographic data showing a sharp population decline in Uighur regions." - Claire Lehmann, founding editor of online magazine Quillette - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670355

#28 - Part 22

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 10

>>18523647 Stephen McDonell Tweet: Video: It wasn’t going to be long before the comments by #Australia’s former Prime Minister were reported on #China’s state media. Paul Keating just popped up on CCTV here.

>>18523724 OPINION: Keating is wrong that Beijing means no harm. Just ask Xi Jinping - "While Keating’s service to the nation should be acknowledged and respected...he’s seriously wrong about the AUKUS submarine project and about the rapidly intensifying strategic competition from the current government in Beijing. When dictators are open about their plans for us, they should be taken seriously. The Chinese embassy was good enough to declare in late 2020, via its 14 demands, that Australia’s role in any region that Beijing dominated would be to accept all Chinese investment, host all Chinese students, never criticise Chinese policy, and become effectively a Chinese economic colony. And in response to our attempt to gain the weapons systems needed to make us less vulnerable, Beijing has already threatened to make us a nuclear target." - Tony Abbott, former Liberal prime minister of Australia - theage.com.au

>>18523818 Albanese, Wong return fire at Keating but Garrett, unions back former PM - A brawl has erupted within Labor over the deal to acquire eight nuclear-powered submarines from the United States and United Kingdom, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and senior cabinet ministers pushed back on Paul Keating’s strident criticisms of the AUKUS pact. Albanese said his predecessor’s jibes did nothing “other than diminish him, frankly”, while Foreign Minister Penny Wong, whom Keating lambasted in an appearance at the National Press Club, said his views on China and other foreign policy questions “belong to another time”. Rudd and Gillard era government cabinet minister Peter Garrett weighed into the debate to say the AUKUS deal “stinks” and two powerful blue-collar unions, the Maritime Union of Australia and the Electrical Trades Union, condemned the nuclear-powered project as a dangerous waste of money.

>>18523974 Video: Australia to buy more than 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles from the US in billion-dollar deal - Australia is set to buy 220 Tomahawk cruise missiles from the US in a deal worth more than $1 billion. The US State Department has approved the sale of the arms to Australia, but the deal still needs to be approved by congress. These missiles have an operational range of more than 1600 kilometres - further than driving from Sydney to Adelaide - and has the capacity to "loiter" over a battlefield before choosing a target. "Australia is one of our most important allies in the Western Pacific. The strategic location of this political and economic power contributes significantly to ensuring peace and economic stability in the region," the department said. "It is vital to the U.S. national interest to assist our ally in developing and maintaining a strong and ready self-defense capability."

>>18530408 On AUKUS, is Paul Keating OK with security on China’s terms? - "China has undertaken the largest and most rapid peacetime military build-up in human history. It has been exporting surveillance and censorship technology around the world. It has aligned itself with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s relentless attempts to annex first parts and then the whole of Ukraine. It has militarised the South China Sea, in flat contradiction of undertakings not to do so. It has turned from collegial to dictatorial leadership. It has engaged in ruthless repression of the Uighurs in Xinjiang and of the democracy movement in Hong Kong. It has increased its internal security budget to levels even greater than its ballooning military budget. It has embarked on systematic attempts to achieve nuclear parity with the US and naval supremacy. It is seeking to take the lead in key hi-tech sectors with strategic implications. And its leader, Xi, repeatedly has stated that his military forces must be prepared to fight and win a war. Keating has dismissed the nuclear submarines as being like “toothpicks thrown against a mountain”. Were that so, Beijing presumably would not be protesting so vehemently against its acquisition or against the AUKUS and Quadrilateral Security Dialogue alignments." - Paul Monk, head of the China desk in the Defence Intelligence Organisation when Paul Keating was prime minister - theaustralian.com.au

>>18530501 U.S. Embassy Australia Tweet: USS Asheville welcomed aboard Australian and diplomatic guests in #Perth this week. Guests were given a unique view above deck, and toured below, experiencing diving operations, fire drills, and most importantly meeting our proud @USNavy sailors.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670358

#28 - Part 23

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 11

>>18537852 New submarines will deter blockades that cut us off from the world: Marles - Defence Minister Richard Marles says Australia’s fleet of nuclear-powered submarines will help deter a foreign adversary from launching a shipping blockade which could cut off the country’s trading routes from the rest of the world. With 99 per cent of Australia’s trade coming from ships, Marles says the nation is very reliant on trade by sea and that needed to be protected.

>>18537864 No US war pact in return for nuclear subs: Marles - Australia's defence minister insists no pledge has been made to go to war alongside the United States in return for nuclear submarines, which he says will be used to guard vital shipping lanes.

>>18543804 ABC cowers as Keating given free rein on China - "The ABC has won awards for reporting on Chinese interference in domestic Australian affairs and intimidation of Chinese-born Australians living here. Yet the ABC did not raise the issue last week or discuss China-funded Confucius Institutes at Australian universities. China’s Belt and Road Initiatives are probably history’s most aggressive foreign policy manifestation of influence peddling. China has interfered in public events here dating back to the hacking of the Melbourne Film Festival in 2009 for showing a film about Uigher activist Rebiya Kadeer. It has attempted to hack several parliamentary databases. China has attempted to have the Great Barrier Reef placed on the UN’s World Heritage endangered list. It has arrested Australian nationals and Chinese Australians working in China on trumped-up charges and detained them for years. Yet Keating was allowed to claim the Chinese just want Australia as a friend." - Chris Mitchell - theaustralian.com.au

>>18543854 Tomahawk missiles coming before Australia gets AUKUS nuclear submarines - Australia will field long-range Tomahawk strike missiles on submarines years before it takes possession of its first US Virginia-class nuclear-­powered boats in the early 2030s, well informed sources say. As part of the Defence Strategic Review, which will be released in April, the government is likely to announce it will integrate Tomahawk missiles into the nation’s existing six Collins-class submarines.

>>18543899 Canberra warned of being double-dealer in its China policy after aggressive AUKUS deal - Analysts called on Beijing to be alert toward Canberra, which could be a double-dealer over its China policy, after Australia's defense minister claimed that Australia has "absolutely not" given the US a commitment that it would join its top security ally in a potential conflict over the Taiwan question in AUKUS negotiations. - Xu Keyue - globaltimes.cn

>>18543918 Frontlines blurred as rivals redefine weapons of war - "Australia is beset with non-military vulnerabilities. Allowing Chinese state-owned enterprises, mandated to operate under CCP’s civil-military fusion, to own critical assets and resources is just silly. Leasing the Port of Darwin and approving China Baowu Steel Group’s $2bn investment in a Western Australian iron ore project are good examples. It makes even less sense as Newcastle, along with Port Kembla in the Illawarra and Brisbane are short-listed as potential sites for a new submarine base, when, in 2014, China Merchants Port Holdings Company took a 50 per cent stake in the Newcastle Port. No rockets fired, no battleships used, no “little green men” deployed. Instead, we keep selling them the rope." - Jason Thomas - theaustralian.com.au

>>18551004 ‘Away from the prying eyes’: Fight erupts over how to keep tabs on AUKUS subs plan - The federal government has rejected an opposition push to create a high-powered parliamentary committee to scrutinise the implementation of the AUKUS security pact, including the development of a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines. The Coalition is arguing that a project of such cost and magnitude as AUKUS deserves a standalone statutory oversight committee rather than periodic accountability through the politically charged Senate estimates process.

>>18551011 Video: Labor backbencher Josh Wilson breaks ranks on AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines - Federal Labor is playing down suggestions the party is divided over the government's plans to spend up to $368 billion buying and building a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines. Labor backbencher Josh Wilson used a speech in the parliament to speak out against the AUKUS pact with the United Kingdom and the United States, fearing it might undermine Australia's commitment to nuclear non-proliferation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670361

#28 - Part 24

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 12

>>18558080 Rogue Labor MP Josh Wilson puts first dent in party’s AUKUS unity - "That Labor MP Josh Wilson shattered the remarkable unity the Albanese government has had up until now by publicly opposing the AUKUS agreement demonstrates the job ahead of the government to socialise its younger members, the ALP activist base and the whole millennial generation on national security. Wilson’s strange public rebellion, before he can possibly be across the detail of everything AUKUS involves, was the government’s first outbreak of disunity. If it’s a one-off, it’s unimportant. If it’s a trend, it’s the worst news Labor could have." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18558093 New Zealand opposition concerned by AUKUS - New Zealand's opposition has flagged concerns with Australia's AUKUS defence agreement, saying it makes New Zealand less safe, while querying whether the deal will even come to pass. New Zealand is Australia's sole military ally, but is not involved with the military tie-up between Australia, the United States and United Kingdom, from which Australia will receive nuclear technology to power submarines. Wellington, like many Pacific capitals, is firmly anti-nuclear.

>>18564845 It’s time to return fire against AUKUS naysayers - "The AUKUS pathway for Australia’s nuclear-powered submarines is barely 10 days old. Already it is clear that the biggest threat to the plan is not the opposition, which is embracing bipartisan support, or China’s absurd attempts to distract from its own military behaviour by saying AUKUS threatens regional security. Labor’s biggest challenge comes from within: it’s the attacks on AUKUS from Paul Keating, Bob Carr, at least one Labor backbencher and former Labor staff." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

>>18564862 Australian and Chinese defence talks a sign AUKUS submarines have not hurt ties - Chinese and Australian defence officials have had a first meeting since 2019 in a sign the AUKUS nuclear-powered subs plan has not derailed efforts by both nations to improve relations. The Chinese Defence Ministry said the 8th Sino-Australian Ministry of National Defence Working Meeting had been a productive one. “Negotiations have further enhanced mutual understanding, which is conducive to the healthy and stable development of the relationship between the two militaries,” it said in a statement.

>>18564880 New Zealand better off outside AUKUS: Clark - Key Kiwi foreign policy thinkers believe being left out of AUKUS will bring strategic advantages for New Zealand, including an improved relationship with China. Former Prime Minister Helen Clark has voiced her opposition to the deal, questioning the need to align so explicitly with American defence policy. "New Zealand interests do not lie in being associated with AUKUS," she posted on Twitter. "Association would be damaging to independent foreign policy."

>>18564895 AUKUS tech sharing clears first hurdle in US Congress The US House of Representatives passed a bill on Wednesday (22 March 2023) designed to loosen controls on sharing military technology under the AUKUS agreement with Australia and Britain. The legislation would direct the US State Department to report to Congress on efforts to implement the advanced capabilities pillar of the AUKUS alliance, and to identify key export controls that Congress must ease to make the pact a success.

>>18571849 Risk to fuel supply a reason Australia needs AUKUS subs - The ability of China to cut fuel supplies to Australia by blockading shipping lanes was a key example of why a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines was required, Defence Minister Richard Marles has argued.

>>18571920 This outrageously expensive subs deal simply caters to the US. Again - "In one week the government’s justification for needing outrageously expensive nuclear submarines has shifted from defending the continent to the old 1960s forward defence policy in Asia which lured us into Vietnam – with all its heartbreak." - Paul Keating, prime minister of Australia from 1991 to 1996 - afr.com

>>18571958 AUKUS opens Australia to giant defence deals with US - Australia is now a core partner in the US-led strategy to boost long-range firepower to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific, according to Kathy Warden, head of global defence giant Northrop Grumman.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670363

#28 - Part 25

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 13

>>18571987 China opposes AUKUS nuclear submarine program and coercion of IAEA Secretariat into endorsing it: FM - China has expressed its grave concern and firm opposition after the US, the UK and Australia pushed forward nuclear-powered submarine cooperation and coerced IAEA Secretariat to endorse the cooperation, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said on Thursday at a routine press conference. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18572000 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on March 23, 2023 - "AUKUS is a small bloc composed of Anglo-Saxon nations. It has been pressing ahead with nuclear submarine cooperation and coercing the IAEA into endorsing their plan. China has made clear its severe concern and firm opposition."

>>18572034 Key to China-Australia ties thaw lies in the hands of Canberra - "Australia should keep sober and understand the importance of its relationship with China. As Australia is a sovereign power, China hopes that Australia will not succumb to any country or become a military pawn. It is believed that the Albanese administration has sufficient political wisdom to make decisions in line with its national interests." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18577150 Likening American and Chinese approaches to spheres of influence doesn’t make sense - "There is an analytical trick commonly used by the strongest critics of AUKUS. Those arguing that China ought to be afforded its natural sphere of influence in Asia tend to begin with the misleading assumption that the US and China are the only pertinent geo-strategic actors in Asia. Forget the inconvenient reality that almost every Asian nation, with rare exceptions such as North Korea, consider China the major threat even if they disagree as to how the US and its allies ought to respond." - John Lee, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington - theaustralian.com.au

>>18583010 Xinhua Commentary: No good would come out of AUKUS - "Washington, London and Canberra have no right to put their own geopolitical ends above international laws and regulations or the interests of other countries, nor should they, or any other parties, put AUKUS in place before broad consensus is reached." - Xinhua - english.news.cn

>>18594115 ACTU’s nuclear-free defence policy at odds with government’s AUKUS plan - The union movement is at odds with Labor over the government’s nuclear submarine plan, with ACTU president Michele O’Neil declaring today that unions backed a “nuclear free defence policy”. Ms O’Neil said the policy was a longstanding one, and the union movement was seeking more detail from the government on the AUKUS plan so ACTU affiliates could discuss the policy.

>>18600044 ASIO to take over issuing high-level security clearances due to ‘unprecedented’ espionage threat - The spy agency ASIO will take over issuing the highest level security clearances in Australia in response to what the government calls “the unprecedented threat from espionage and foreign interference”. While the Aukus nuclear-powered submarine plans were not specifically mentioned, the government’s notes to parliament said that the measures would help “ensure the ongoing confidence of our most trusted allies”. The legislation will make the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) responsible for issuing, maintaining and revoking Australia’s highest level of security clearance, known as “positive vetting”.

>>18606866 Keating’s blistering attack on AUKUS leaves Australia in damage control in US - Paul Keating’s blistering attack against the $368 billion AUKUS pact is having an ongoing ripple effect in Washington, where members of an Australian parliamentary delegation have been forced to explain the former prime minister’s view that the plan is “the worst deal in all history”. Two weeks after Keating launched his broadside and blasted the “incompetence” of the Albanese government for signing up to the deal with the US and the UK, politicians and policy officials on Capitol Hill have continued to raise concerns about the incendiary remarks, pushing Australia into damage control. The issue came to the fore when a Canberra delegation, led by Liberal senator James Paterson and Labor MP Meryl Swanson, landed in Washington this week to meet members of Congress and the Biden administration to discuss the implementation of AUKUS – only to find themselves fielding questions about Keating’s comments.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670365

#28 - Part 26

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 14

>>18622376 China’s economic boycott of Australia led to AUKUS pact - China’s “undeclared economic boycott” of Australia was one of several provocative actions that spurred new partnerships including AUKUS, according to Joe Biden’s Indo-Pacific tsar, Kurt Campbell, who rubbished the Chinese government’s complaint that the US-led response was a threat.

>>18650729 AUKUS will ‘stop China destroying world order’: US Navy Secretary - Two of the most influential figures in the US Navy have cast the AUKUS security pact as a bulwark against Chinese and Russian attempts to “change the world we live in”, in remarks at a private dinner in Washington that included Ambassador Kevin Rudd and President Biden’s top adviser for the Indo-Pacific, Kurt Campbell. In an apparent confirmation of Chinese and Russian accusations the three-nation military alliance, which has undertaken to equip Australia with at least eight nuclear powered submarines by the 2040s, was aimed at Beijing and Moscow, US Navy Secretary Carlos del Toro said AUKUS was critical to stopping China from “destroying the world order”. Republican Congressman Rob Wittman, who last year was sceptical the US could accommodate Australia’s requirements given its own needs, told The Australian South Australian shipbuilding yards could one day build submarines for the US navy.

#28 - Part 27

Cardinal George Pell - Sexual Abuse and Vatican Financial Scandal Allegations

>>18491464 Disgraced cardinal ‘detached’ over allegations Vatican funds used to harm Pell - A disgraced Catholic cardinal was “detached” and “unperturbed” when told of allegations that money was sent from Rome to Australia to pursue the late George Pell over sexual abuse claims, a Vatican tribunal has heard. Sacked by the Pope two years ago amid allegations of an array of financial crimes, Angelo Becciu is one of 10 defendants accused of money laundering, embezzlement and fraud in the wake of the acquisition of a $400m building in London’s Sloane Avenue.

#28 - Part 28

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial

>>18544043 SAS veteran Oliver Schulz charged with war crime of murder over killing of Afghan man in field - A decorated former SAS soldier shown in a Four Corners story shooting an Afghan man in a wheat field has become the first Australian serviceman or veteran to be charged with a war crime under Australian law. Former trooper Oliver Schulz, 41, was arrested by the Australian Federal Police at Jindabyne in the New South Wales Snowy Mountains this morning, after a years-long investigation into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan.

>>18594080 Ex-soldier granted bail over alleged wartime murder of Afghan villager - A former soldier accused of the wartime murder of an Afghan villager has been granted bail after a magistrate ruled he was at risk of being attacked by Taliban sympathisers while in prison. Oliver Schulz, 41, was arrested last week and charged with one count of War Crime - Murder by the Australian Federal Police. The AFP has alleged that Mr Schulz murdered Dad Mohammad in a wheat field while deployed in Afghanistan with the Australian Defence Force. He is alleged to have shot Mr Mohammed, a father and struggling farmer, in the Uruzgan Province in May, 2012.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670366

#28 - Part 29

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 1

>>18444244 Indigenous voice risks perpetuating a long history of failure - "If we want to make a difference in the lives of our most marginalised, we have to begin by putting a stop to treating Aboriginal Australians differently. The structures that have existed and failed, despite the billions of dollars of investment, are systems that have been built on the ideological premise that Aboriginal Australians are to be treated differently and separately and are inherently disadvantaged as a result of racial heritage. Constitutionally enshrining the very voices that exist within the structures that perpetuate the ideological notion that Aboriginal Australians are inherently disadvantaged, is constitutionally enshrining failure." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Country Liberal Party senator for the Northern Territory - theaustralian.com.au

>>18444251 Video: The Voice. Who Will Qualify? WARNING:- Do not ask questions about who will qualify for the aboriginal voice to Parliament because those questions might be labeled “borderline racist”. That’s the message from the Albanese Labor government. How can Australians have any confidence in this overtly politicised process? - Senator Alex Antic

>>18460516 Support for Indigenous voice to parliament stalls amid uncertainty: Newspoll, March 7 2023 - Support for an Indigenous voice is slipping, with the near universal backing among younger voters and Labor supporters falling since February, amid debate over whether it should be able to advise the executive government as well as parliament.

>>18460537 Peter Dutton ‘pissing in our pockets’ on voice, member of working group says - A member of the Albanese government’s referendum working group has accused Peter Dutton of “pissing in our pockets” and being “extremely disingenuous” in his dealings on the Indigenous voice to parliament, after the Coalition opposed the referendum machinery provisions. Marcus Stewart, who was also a member of the Indigenous voice co-design groups under the Morrison government and a Nira illim bulluk man, told The Australian: “Australians woke up to the worst kept secret in politics, the opposition will be voting No.”

>>18466623 Ken Wyatt warns Anthony Albanese to change tack on the voice and provide more detail - Ken Wyatt, a key adviser to the government on an Indigenous voice to parliament, has issued a stark warning to Anthony Albanese to change tack and spell out fundamental details on the advisory body as concerns mount the Yes campaign is “losing ground”. The intervention from Mr Wyatt, the first Aboriginal cabinet minister and an Indigenous Australians minister in the Morrison government, follows the latest Newspoll that revealed support for the voice had fallen from 56 per cent at the start of the year to 53 per cent, with more Australians unsure how they would vote at the referendum.

>>18466641 ‘Donate your white corpse to atone for colonial sins’ - Palawa (Tasmanian Indigenous) artist Nathan Maynard is seeking an Australian of British descent to donate their body for an artwork to atone for sins against his people – and challenge “virtue-signalling” whitefellas. “Potential applicants should see this opportunity as an honour. The body and the memory of the successful applicant will be treated with the utmost respect at all stages of the project.” “There’s so much tokenism around at the moment. Virtue-signalling is really a trend. It’s trendy to act like you’re on Aboriginal Australians’ side, you’re friends with First Nations people around the world and you want to fight for their cause. “But I do suspect a lot of that is for people’s own benefit. They might not put their body on the line for an art installation, but what are they physically prepared to do? Are they prepared to come and march on the streets with us for invasion day? Are they prepared to fight alongside us for more land, for a treaty?”

>>18472681 Indigenous voice referendum working group prepare final advice on poll question and proposed constitutional amendment - Indigenous leaders will lock in ­behind a voice with the power to advise both government and parliament as they prepare to hand the Albanese government their final advice for constitutional changes next week. The 21-member referendum working group will on Thursday enter the last stages of its work on the wording of the referendum question and the proposed amendment, ahead of its final meeting in Adelaide before Labor introduces the voice referendum bill at the end of the month.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670367

#28 - Part 30

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 2

>>18472703 Time to dump flawed Indigenous voice model - "The slide in support for the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament has given Anthony Albanese little option but to accept that the plan he unveiled at last July’s Garma festival is a dud. Despite the Prime Minister’s best efforts, the Garma provision has failed to capitalise on goodwill towards Indigenous people and is a force for discord." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia.

>>18478798 Mark Dreyfus’s attempts to water down Indigenous voice to parliament’s ‘executive government’ powers rejected - Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, who tried to water down the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament’s power to advise the executive government, has been rebuked by Aboriginal leaders in the government’s own referendum working group. Critics of the executive government clause argue it should be removed to limit the scope for legal challenges. Sources told The Australian Mr Dreyfus put a different proposal to the group on Thursday but it was knocked back. “The Attorney-General over-reached and the group rejected his proposal,” one source at the meeting said. “There’s a growing frustration among a significant number of referendum working group members on the presentation of advice (by government) and not being provided timely advice. Information has been continually presented to the group at the last minute without enough time for it to be fully considered.”

>>18478807 Coalition calls for legal advice on Indigenous voice to be make public - The Coalition has called for the public release of the legal advice on the Indigenous voice to parliament that prompted the Albanese government to seek to water down the referendum proposal by removing the need for executive government to advise on new laws.

>>18491371 Top silk Brett Walker rebuked over ‘offensive’ voice defence by barrister Louise Clegg - A prominent Sydney barrister has issued a stinging rebuke to Bret Walker, after the senior silk accused critics of the current voice model of being racists, labelling his comments “grotesque and offensive”. Walker, one of Australia’s most distinguished barristers, said that some lawyers who have raised concerns about the likely power and influence of a constitutionally entrenched indigenous advisory body were “racist”. Barrister Louise Clegg has written to NSW Bar Association president Gabrielle Bashir calling for the professional body to publicly reprimand Mr Walker for his comments.

>>18496959 Wording of Constitutional change to enshrine Indigenous Voice to be revealed - Australians are about to find out how the Constitution would be changed to enshrine an Indigenous Voice to parliament. But Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus is remaining tight-lipped on the wording of the draft amendment, refusing to confirm speculation it could be altered to win over the federal Liberal Party and other conservatives.

>>18496978 Indigenous voice to parliament: maybe we need to start debate over - "Is this what the legal profession has sunk to? The Bar, the institution that brought us the cab-rank rule to ensure even unpopular defendants and causes can get the best defence reasonably available – the profession that has championed free speech, rational debate and individual freedom – now sees its leaders use their platforms to demean those with different legal views." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18497000 Queensland activist Wayne Wharton targets Albanese in campaign to quash the voice - Anthony Albanese has been targeted by one of Queensland’s veteran Aboriginal activists, Wayne Wharton, who spent the weekend campaigning against the voice across the Prime Minister’s Sydney seat. Mr Wharton, a member of the Sovereign Embassies Working Group, warned the voice in its current form would take away self-determination by giving power to a panel of “cherrypicked black­fellas”. Banners proclaiming “F.ck your voice, it’s not ours” hung behind the group as its members met people at markets and shops.

>>18497034 Michelle Landry on why she will be voting against the Voice - A Central Queensland MP opposing the Indigenous Voice to parliament says there’s already enough representation and the solution lies in giving Indigenous peoples “something to get out of bed for”. Capricorn MP Michelle Landry is holding firm to the Nationals’ party line in saying no to the Voice, but this is the first time she has individually outlined her reasons for doing so.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670369

#28 - Part 31

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 3

>>18497072 Marcia Langton attacks ‘relentless scare campaign’ waged by opponents of Indigenous voice - Prof Marcia Langton, one of the most experienced members of the Indigenous voice to parliament working group, has launched an attack on the “relentless scare campaign” waged by opponents and called on the government to “reassure” voters by endorsing the voice co-design report. Langton has called on the Albanese government to endorse the report as the basis for post-referendum parliamentary processes and public consultations. The report lays out in detail how a national voice model would operate.

>>18504880 History shows No vote on Indigenous voice will win, says referendums expert- A world-leading expert on referendums says that regardless of the wording of the constitutional amendment on the Indigenous voice to parliament, Australians will vote No when the question is put to them later this year. Matt Qvortrup, a constitutional law expert who predicted the outcome of referendums such as Brexit, said he doubted the legal ramifications dominating the debate around the voice would decide people’s vote. Professor Qvortrup, a visiting professor at the Australian National University, said legal questions including the inclusion of executive government in the amendment would largely be seen as “an elite issue” by voters. He raised the fact the referendum would be compulsory as something that would encourage more people to vote No.

>>18517082 Benefits of the voice will far outweigh risks - "The proposed amendment to the Constitution to provide for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice to parliament and the executive offers the opportunity for great benefits. The first of these is the recognition of our First Peoples in our national Constitution. Their recognition, which the creation of the voice will establish, is not recognition of a race. It is recognition of their special historical status as the first occupiers of our continent. They are the bearers of its first great history stretching back tens of thousands of years. They are also the bearers of a rich culture expressed in dreaming stories, art, song and ceremony of which all Australians can be proud. The second benefit is the creation of a constitutionally supported means of communicating to parliament and the executive advice based on the experience and perspectives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples across Australia. The inadequacy of our laws and practices to respond to the immense social justice challenge posed by acute inequity at many levels of a significant number of Indigenous peoples poses a national challenge. The voice is intended to bring together those experiences and perspectives to try to influence change in our laws and practices for the better. That is not just a benefit for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It is a benefit to the whole of the Australian people." - Robert French, 12th Chief Justice of Australia from 2008 to 2017 - theaustralian.com.au

>>18524003 Watering down draft demeans spirit of the voice - "The government should not weaken the voice drafting to appease exaggerated concerns. The Attorney-General’s suggested change would short-change Indigenous people and invite future bad faith efforts to undermine the voice." - Shireen Morris, director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University Law School - theaustralian.com.au

>>18524027 Latest voice tinkering opens door to litigation - "A few short months ago the government unveiled a plan for a race-based institution that would not necessarily be elected and would have a limitless mandate to advise on all laws and policies – not just those that concern Indigenous affairs. And if its advice were not considered, it could litigate. The very real complication of setting up the voice to second guess decisions made by the federal executive – ministers and public servants – has serious consequences for governance and the law itself. The government needs to revisit this mess and make a decision: does it want the voice to be an adviser to parliament, or does it want it to drag ministers and public servants into court?" - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18537964 So, whose voice is it anyway? "There has been a distinct sleight of hand here in the development of the voice model. Originally, it was a conservative product designed precisely to avoid judicial activism. But over the past year, groups of mainly Indigenous activists have worked to transform the model into precisely the opposite. They want a hamstrung executive. They desire High Court challenges." - Greg Craven, constitutional lawyer and a member of the government’s constitutional expert group - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670370

#28 - Part 32

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 4

>>18537994 Quietly and behind closed doors, Labor alters its voice draft - "The Albanese government has changed its position on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government – the proposed wording for the referendum to be held this year is now different. This momentous shift on the eve of the parliamentary sittings in which the final preparations and political commitments for the national vote will be decided has occurred based on secret advice, meetings behind closed doors, the extraordinary involvement of the Solicitor-General in private briefings, fears of constitutional overreach, findings of practically unworkable implementation, without any public declaration, certainly no public debate and utterly no public information from the government." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18557993 Jacinta Price, Warren Mundine fire Voice warning shot to Albanese - Nationals senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has warned Prime Minister Anthony Albanese not to expect First Nations people to vote “yes” on the Voice to parliament referendum. Senator Nampijinpa Price and Warren Mundine, both leaders of official “no” campaigns, spent Wednesday morning in Parliament House, speaking to Indigenous community representatives from across the country. They said Aboriginal people did not want to be divided or segregated, as they say the Voice threatened to do.

>>18558012 Dismissing voice sceptics as ‘racist’ demeans debate - "I think there are very good reasons for opposing the constitutional amendment proposal. We have next to no detail. It will constitutionalise this body and thereby bring in the top judges who, in the name of interpreting the Constitution, will have the power to trump the elected parliament. We have seen that our top judges have become more and more inclined towards judicial usurpation or judicial activism, call it what you will." - James Allan, Garrick professor of law at the University of Queensland - theaustralian.com.au

>>18558047 Voters in the dark over shambolic voice referendum - "Australia is embarking on an enormous defence expenditure commitment, which will require clear direction from the cabinet and the government over coming decades on financial and other matters. There is clear risk that the referendum wording will severely disrupt the working of government (no matter which party is in power) and its ability to manage the nation. One interpretation of the current proposed constitutional change wording is that the country will become almost ungovernable, with severe consequences for the standard living of all people. The issue has moved far beyond the question of proper recognition of the role of our First Nations people in our history." - Robert Gottliebsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18558060 PM risks disaster in sliding doors moment - "The Indigenous voice to parliament demands bipartisan support to pass, but Anthony Albanese has walked into a no-man’s land between voice absolutists and the voting public. This confrontation is just the beginning of his problems, as the PM’s leadership approaches a seminal moment less than a year after his election." - Cameron Milner - theaustralian.com.au

>>18558071 Anthony Albanese and Indigenous voice to parliament enter critical 10 days - "The next 10 days could decide the fate of an Indigenous voice to parliament and government, as well as Anthony Albanese’s credibility and prime ministerial authority. The Prime Minister’s tone and emphasis, if not intent, are ­changing under the pressing reality of conflict and conundrums inherent in the proposal for a voice to parliament and executive government." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18558076 Labor and the Coalition strike deal on management of Voice to Parliament referendum - The federal government has struck a deal with the Coalition on legislation setting out how this year's referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament will be managed. Labor has made a concession in allowing an official pamphlet to be distributed across the country, outlining the respective yes and no cases. But it has not agreed to the Coalition's demands for equal Commonwealth funding for both sides of the debate.

>>18564783 Video: ‘Very long time in the making’: Albanese reveals Voice referendum wording - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has delivered an emotional plea for Australians to support the Voice to parliament, repeatedly fighting back tears as he announced the wording of the historic referendum question that will be put to the public later this year.

>>18564792 Indigenous voice to parliament: how it will work - From its design to its ability to advise executive government, intervention powers and who will be a member, all your questions answered.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670373

#28 - Part 33

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 5

>>18564808 OPINION: The Voice can’t wait: A prime minister wavers between hope and dread - "It was possible to hear in Anthony Albanese’s faltering voice the burden of his mission: a mixture of hope for success and dread of failure. “This is a risk, having a referendum,” he said. “Usually, they don’t succeed.” And there it was. The dread: the knowledge of the 44 referendums proposing constitutional change put to Australian electors since Federation, and only eight of them approved." - Tony Wright, Associate Editor - theage.com.au

>>18564820 Anthony Albanese lights a fire for critics of the voice to parliament - Anthony Albanese has committed his government to going “all in” on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, given the Indigenous working group all it has asked and rejected the Solicitor-General’s advice to limit the power of the voice over commonwealth government and public servants. A tearful Prime Minister has appealed in a choking voice for Australians to “own” the change which he has proposed and declared there are no circumstances in which the referendum will not be put to the people.

>>18564829 ‘Not racist’: Barnaby Joyce erupts over Voice to Parliament after question revealed - A fired up Barnaby Joyce has slammed the Voice to Parliament, urging Australians to vote no in a stunning display. The former Nationals leader issued a dramatic statement in which he accused the government of being “belligerent” by not releasing the further detail about the body. “I say they don‘t trust you. If they don’t trust you to (release the detail), do not trust them with your vote,” he said. “It is not racist to vote no.”

>>18564833 Voice question ‘far worse’ than feared: constitutional law expert Greg Craven - Prominent constitutional law expert Greg Craven has warned that the proposed question on the Indigenous voice to parliament is “far worse than I had contemplated the worst position being”. Professor Craven, a member of the government’s constitutional law working group, said the wording for the referendum released by Anthony Albanese “takes the problems that people have identified with the preceding drafting and multiplies it”. Professor Craven said the problem with including executive government is it captures the “whole of the decision making of the Commonwealth government” and could potentially impact decision-making on national security, defence and foreign affairs.

>>18571385 Emotional Anthony Albanese takes ownership of voice campaign and stakes leadership authority on result - "Anthony Albanese has now staked the authority of his leadership and that of the government on the outcome of the voice referendum. His emotional appeal for people to support the Yes campaign has ­ensured this. Having spent much of his address on Thursday fighting back tears, Albanese signalled to voters that he is now personally and emotionally invested in the ­outcome." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>18571439 Anthony Albanese says Peter Dutton ‘playing games’ over Voice details - Anthony Albanese has accused Peter Dutton of “playing games” over the Voice. - “We know from a republic playbook that occurred last century that it is nothing more than a tactic, and it lacks genuineness to just continue to say, ‘Oh, we don’t have the detail’,” Mr Albanese said in a press conference on Friday. “No matter how much detail is put out, Peter Dutton will say, ‘Oh, what about more detail?’ That’s the game that’s being played here.”

>>18571458 Indigenous voice to parliament referendum: Sweeping power politics at play - "The Indigenous voice to parliament does not exist and yet it has already had a massive victory in entrenching its ability to intervene in advance, without limit, in any commonwealth decision. Indigenous leaders have trumped the government’s legal advice, steamrolled cabinet and entrenched the voice’s power and scope of intervention with the wording and principles for the referendum." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18571483 PM’s passion lights path towards true change - "For too long government has assumed a deep and entrenched Aboriginal incapacity. We have, as the Prime Minister said, a historic opportunity to change this country and embrace within our nation’s constitutional fabric the oldest continuing culture on earth." - Ben Wyatt, former treasurer and Aboriginal affairs minister in Western Australia - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670374

#28 - Part 34

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 6

>>18571508 Voice ‘radicals’ land fatal blow to referendum hopes - "Anthony Albanese’s much-hyped revelation of his constitutional words for the voice is not a triumph of negotiation and conciliation. It is a ruthless con job. It is aimed at the Australian people as a whole and an adoring media barely literate in constitutional reality. It puts the final bullet through the head of the referendum." - Greg Craven, constitutional lawyer and member of the government’s constitutional expert group - theaustralian.com.au

>>18571535 Wording aside, the voice will end in tears - "With many voters demanding more information about the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament, its supporters have become increasingly irritated. But the proposition that the electorate has a right to know exactly what it is being asked to endorse is utterly unimpeachable. And the Prime Minister’s decision to largely retain the referendum question’s original wording, despite the far-reaching problems it could create, only makes transparency and complete disclosure of the potential implications even more critical." - Henry Ergas - theaustralian.com.au

>>18571624 The tragedy is Indigenous voice plan is wrong in practice and wrong in principle - "What we have just witnessed in Canberra is a masterclass on how to cripple the cause of constitutional recognition of Indigenous people. The government has signed up to a plan that is so extreme and unworkable it will galvanise the No case by ignoring the problems that have come to light since a preliminary version was unveiled last July. Instead of fixing those problems in order to split the No vote, the government of Anthony Albanese has appeased the extremists within its own Indigenous working group on the referendum. Instead of standing up for the egalitarian principles of modern Australian democracy, the government has adopted a proposal that would entrench racial privilege by exposing ministers and public servants to the risk of legal liability." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18577132 Albanese’s flawed voice fails the test - "The Australian tragedy of 2023 is about to unfold. In the most important decision of his prime ministership and of his career, Anthony Albanese has finalised his proposed constitutional referendum for an Indigenous voice declaring his mission is to change this country. It is a tragedy because the Australian Constitution needs to recognise the Indigenous people and what they rightly call the “torment of our powerlessness”, yet the Albanese cabinet decision is an extraordinary and flawed model devoid of bipartisanship or any effort to achieve it." - Paul Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>18582951 Defiant PM’s all-in gamble on voice - "Two days after warning his Labor colleagues in Canberra that no referendum in Australia had been passed without bipartisan support, Anthony Albanese released words and principles for the referendum on the Indigenous voice that virtually ensure there will be no bipartisanship. The Prime Minister’s acceptance of the Indigenous working group’s rejection of the Solicitor-General’s advice aimed at limiting the intervention of the voice on the day-to-day working of government has all but guaranteed Liberal Party opposition to the referendum." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18582967 Former judge fears members of proposed voice beyond watchdog eyes - The Albanese government may need to amend National Anti-Corruption Commission legislation to ensure members of the proposed voice to parliament are captured under the watchdog, former NSW Court of Appeal judge Anthony Whealy has warned. The Centre for Public Integrity chair said he was “puzzled” as to how the voice advisory body would be subject to the existing scope of the NACC working mechanism.

>>18588261 Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott says vote ‘no’ to a voice to parliament that divides us - "Getting Indigenous kids to school, Indigenous adults to work and keeping Indigenous communities safe are more important than a form of recognition that would turn out to be both divisive and counter-productive. I’d prefer to avoid the moral scorn that will be directed at all voice critics. But in the absence of an 11th-hour prime ministerial change of heart, it’s absolutely necessary that Australia vote no." - Tony Abbott, 28th prime minister of Australia (2013-15) - theaustralian.com.au

>>18588282 Voice could make representations to governor-general, says Mark Dreyfus - Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus says the Indigenous voice will be able to make representations to the governor-general of the day “insofar as it’s ever relevant” but it’ll focus its attention on “things which matter most”, like health and education.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670375

#28 - Part 35

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 7

>>18588288 Anthony Albanese, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus issue contradiction on voice powers - As the government seeks to explain and defend the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, confusion over how it works and what powers it will have is growing, as Anthony Albanese and Mark Dreyfus contradict each other. Dreyfus agreed tax, welfare and foreign policy would be included in the remit of the voice, although this may moderate over time. Albanese declared it wasn’t about defence or foreign policy and would be restricted to issues that “directly affect” indigenous Australians.

>>18588296 Dreyfus admits High Court challenges to parliament a possibility - Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus has conceded the voice to parliament and the executive will have the power to challenge government decisions in the High Court if it believes it has not been properly advised. The concession came as constitutional expert and voice proponent Frank Brennan prayed for a “Lazarus-style miracle” in his Sunday sermon, decrying the lack of process, transparency and public participation in the development of the proposed constitutional amendment.

>>18588307 Neil Mitchell blasts media, former ABC host Jon Faine over ‘urban white’ voice criticism - Broadcaster Neil Mitchell has lashed out at the Melbourne media after they openly cheered on a speech made by former ABC radio host Jon Faine in which he urged them to support the voice. Mitchell took to the airwaves on Monday morning to voice his concerns about the reaction to the speech after the former Melbourne morning radio presenter – who was once his on-air rival – criticised “urban white” commentators for weighing into the debate on the voice.

>>18594045 Climate policy in Anthony Albanese’s push for Indigenous voice to parliament - The Greens have upheld the need for the voice to provide advice on policies such as the safeguard mechanism in a rebuke to Anthony Albanese, arguing the climate policy, and the coal and gas projects it could affect, directly impacts upon Indigenous Australians. Greens First Nations and resources spokeswoman Dorinda Cox said she was “deeply disappointed” by the Prime Minister’s comments on Monday dismissing the prospect of the voice making representations to the government or the Greens on the safeguard mechanism.

>>18594063 Libs need values not ‘tactics’ for voice clash - "If Australia votes Yes to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice in the Constitution it will be the most radical, and damaging, change to our Constitution we’ve ever made. It will enshrine one single message, and supporting mechanism, permanently into our national life – that Australians are forever divided by race." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18600106 Noel Pearson’s pain over Liberal strategy on Indigenous voice - Indigenous leader Noel Pearson says he is “heartbroken” by the behaviour of opposition legal ­affairs spokesman Julian Leeser and his criticism of the voice.

>>18600110 Albanese slams voice ‘scare campaign’ - Anthony Albanese has slammed the “noise” and search for “every nuance” in the wording of the Indigenous voice to parliament, which he says is nothing but a “scare campaign”.

>>18600117 Anthony Albanese must cultivate coherence and party cohesion on Indigenous voice - "Labor has got off to a bad and confusing start in the Yes campaign after releasing the words and principles for the referendum in a debate that could stretch for months. Albanese is getting caught between opponents to the referendum fearful of a wide-ranging new layer of bureaucracy reaching into day-to-day government and voice proponents demanding an all-encompassing power to intervene in all policy." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18600124 Anthony Albanese refines his message on the voice, but contradictions remain - "The nub of Albanese’s refined argument is that: the proposal is not radical, “it’s a modest and conservative” plan; parliament will have “primacy” and determine “essentially the operation” of the voice; the media needs to support the referendum; that it’s “pretty close” to what now Shadow Attorney-General, Julian Leeser, proposed seven years ago and; critics of the proposed words are “scare mongering” and playing word games." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670377

#28 - Part 36

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 8

>>18600135 Voice activists, not lawyers, behind dishonest debate - "Asked about the voice’s reach over energy projects, Albanese rebuked the reporter, saying it applies only to matters that “directly” affect Indigenous people. That is false. Indigenous activists have ensured the wording does not limit the voice to matters that “directly” affect Indigenous people. The new Indigenous-only bureaucracy will have sweeping constitutional powers to make representations over just about every policy or decision that may affect Indigenous people in any way. The Constitutional Expert Group comprising nine legal experts – and chaired by the A-G – claims the voice will not give Indigenous people special rights. That is wrong. Only the members of the voice and its Indigenous constituency will have a constitutional right to influence parliament, government and the public service." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18600210 Collingwood aboard for the Yes campaign on Indigenous voice - The Collingwood Football Club board says enshrining an Indigenous voice in the Constitution is the right thing to do, two years since the release of an ­independent review that ­described the AFL club’s history of racism as “distinct and egregious” and demanded change from its leaders. Collingwood announced the board decision to back the Indigenous advisory body on Wednesday as the boards of other clubs in the AFL and NRL prepare to declare formal positions on the voice referendum in coming days and weeks. The Australian has been told the boards of many clubs in national codes will endorse the Yes campaign.

>>18606770 Anthony Albanese at odds with experts over Indigenous voice to parliament - Anthony Albanese’s public assurance that parliament will control what matters the voice can consider has been challenged by the nation’s top constitutional law ­experts, who say the scope of the advisory body cannot be restricted by politicians. Constitutional law experts Anne Twomey and George Wil­liams said the amendment’s second clause, which gives the voice power to “make representations to the parliament and the executive government of the commonwealth on matters relating to ­Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander peoples”, ensured what it considered and advised on was out of reach of the parliament.

>>18606778 Voting No to Indigenous voice to parliament doesn’t mean you reject human rights - "My message is simple. You can believe passionately in human rights, equality and the importance of reconciliation and decide – based on your belief in the importance of those principles – to vote No. A constitutional referendum is always an occasion of significance. During the coming months I would encourage all Australians to think carefully about this proposal and what it will mean. But, even more important, I would encourage all Australians to ensure that our conversations about the voice are conducted in good faith and that different views are respected. Every Australian must be free to make up their own mind about voting Yes or No." - Lorraine Finlay, Human Rights Commissioner - theaustralian.com.au

>>18606799 Indigenous voice to parliament drafting debate fuelled by ‘shallow tribalism’ and fear - "The government’s recent drafting change has perfected the Indigenous voice to parliament amendment. There is now neat reciprocity in the change to clause three, strengthening parliament’s power and answering concerns about High Court uncertainty. The voice has broad discretion to advise on matters relating to Indigenous people, and parliament has broad discretion to legislate on matters relating to the voice. This is balanced. Such reciprocity can underpin mutual responsibility, creating a new partnership to achieve better practical outcomes." - Shireen Morris, director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie Law School - theaustralian.com.au

>>18606813 Video: Bill to trigger Voice referendum introduced to parliament - A bill that would trigger the referendum on whether to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament has been introduced into the lower house. Introducing the bill, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said it would rectify a fundamental wrong in the constitution. Mr Dreyfus said that until the constitution recognised First Nations people, Australia was a "nation missing its heart".

>>18606824 Voice bill ‘takes Australia one step closer to making history’ - Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has declared the introduction of the Constitution Alteration Bill takes the country “one step closer to making history”, as she hit out at “doubters” and “wreckers” she said want to hold the country back.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670380

#28 - Part 37

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 9

>>18613099 Indigenous voice to parliament referendum rewrite is a tragedy in the making - "Albanese just cannot get the voice’s scope right. He is forever saying that this or that decision would never be covered and would be up to parliament. So far, he has exempted Reserve Bank decisions on interest rates, decisions on national security, and carbon guarantees. But he is irretrievably wrong. The voice covers all executive action. Each of these is an executive act. Consequently, they would attract voice representations. End of lesson." - Emeritus professor Greg Craven, constitutional lawyer - theaustralian.com.au

>>18613135 Historic Indigenous voice to parliament bill recognises wounds of our past - "A week ago, when Anthony Albanese announced the words that are now written into this bill, I referred to the tyranny of our dispossession, the denial of our existence by those who wanted to assert supremacy and control our lives while ignoring our concerns and pleas for justice. A voice will rectify this denial. At long last the nation will face up to the lie of terra nullius and recognise that past policies have been detrimental to our collective advancement. I have given much of my life to the cause of reconciliation and recognition in the hope of a better Australia than the experience of my grandparents. I have said before, I am an old man in Aboriginal years. I continue to have faith in the good-heartedness of Australians to carry this referendum. Failure is too much to contemplate because another opportunity to recast this nation would disappear, and the great Australian silence would be maintained." - Senator Pat Dodson, Special Envoy for Reconciliation and the Implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart - theaustralian.com.au

>>18613154 Who is running the Voice to Parliament No campaigns? With the referendum only months away, campaigning on both sides for an Indigenous Voice to parliament is well underway. The No campaign is being run by multiple groups with different perspectives on why they oppose an Indigenous Voice to parliament, none of which have held formal launches yet. Each of the groups have common ground in the campaign and specific points of difference about why they don't want to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice in the constitution.

>>18625626 For battlers, food prices matter more than voice to parliament - "Amid the toughest cost-of-living squeeze in a generation, the public is being asked to vote for something many of them don’t understand and that they also suspect may be unwieldy and expensive. It is seen as something that has no bearing on their day-to-day lives. Yet it is receiving an inordinate amount of attention from politicians across the divide – politicians who voters believe in the current climate should be wholly focused on tackling day-to-day cost-of-living issues. When we play grabs of Anthony Albanese talking about the voice in question time, listeners want to know how his promise to cut $275 from our power bills is coming along. I wonder also whether the sight of Albanese choking back tears as he announced the voice model helped or hindered the cause. I base that on texts from listeners saying they can’t remember the Prime Minister crying when they got their last power bill from AGL." - David Penberthy, South Australia correspondent and co-host of Adelaide’s FiveAA Breakfast Show - theaustralian.com.au

>>18631292 ‘Rushed’ Voice referendum timetable risks social harmony: Coalition - The Voice to parliament referendum should put off to another year, says the Coalition’s spokesman for Indigenous affairs, as the Liberal party calls a snap meeting this week to discuss their position on the proposed constitutional reform. Julian Leeser told the National Press Club on Monday that the national vote, due to take place in the latter part of 2023, was programmed to an “artificial timetable” created by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the nation should revert to a slower, years-long approach to recognition of indigenous Australians in the constitution.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670381

#28 - Part 38

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 10

>>18637950 Julian Leeser hands Peter Dutton a way forward on Indigenous voice to parliament - Julian Leeser has provided Peter Dutton with a key opportunity to support the principle of the voice and avoid locking the Liberals into a purely negative position on the referendum. It is a potential breakthrough for the Opposition following the devastation of the Aston by-election defeat, and would also give Anthony Albanese the option of forging a stronger consensus on the voice – although he is unlikely to take it. Leeser’s proposal would simplify the Prime Minister’s constitutional amendment, limit the risk of High Court challenges and give the parliament even greater control over the voice.

>>18637967 Symbolic intent not enough to change nation’s rule book - "In the Constitution, every word, comma, and even capitals matter. The beauty and strength of our Constitution is that it is a mechanical, sparse rule book for the nation. And symbolic statements made with the best of intent, leave room for clever lawyers to egg on an activist judiciary to imply all sorts of things that were never intended. To argue for changes to the government’s amendment does not mean you oppose the voice, it means you want to ensure it doesn’t detract from a system of government that is world best. If the parliament has the power to establish the voice, and define its powers, why does the power to make representations need to be in the Constitution? I believe this clause will be at the centre of the No case. The constitutional alteration can work without it." - Julian Leeser, opposition Indigenous Affairs spokesman - theaustralian.com.au

>>18644256 Liberal Party to oppose Voice to parliament - The Liberal Party will formally oppose the government’s model for a Voice to parliament. After a two-hour meeting in Canberra on Wednesday the opposition instead voted to support legislated, rather than constitutionally enshrined, local and regional voices. The party will support constitutional recognition of Indigenous people in the Constitution, but not via the creation of a Voice. “The Liberal Party resolved today to say yes to constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians, yes to a local and regional body, so we can get practical outcomes for Indigenous people on the ground [but] there was a resounding no to the prime minister’s Voice,” Mr Dutton told a press conference in Canberra.

>>18644263 Video: Liberals to oppose Indigenous voice referendum, will 'actively' campaign against it - Peter Dutton says the Liberal party will push for local and regional voices set up by parliamentary legislation but will oppose the Indigenous voice referendum. 'The Liberal party resolved today to say yes to constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians, yes to a local and regional body, so we can get practical outcomes for Indigenous people on the ground … there was a resounding no to the prime minister’s voice,' Dutton said. Backbenchers will not be compelled to oppose the voice, with Liberal rules allowing backbenchers a conscience vote on all issues – but the frontbench, including the longtime voice supporter Julian Leeser, will be obligated to follow the party line.

>>18650495 Liberal party’s rejection of the Indigenous voice to parliament will force Anthony Albanese to make history - Opposition leader Peter Dutton will actively campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament ahead of the referendum and has bound his frontbench to reject Anthony Albanese’s proposed model, prompting the Prime Minister to concede a Yes victory has been made more difficult. No referendum has succeeded in Australia without bipartisan support.

>>18650524 Albanese admits Dutton’s ‘resounding no’ a blow to Voice referendum - The campaign for an Indigenous Voice to parliament has suffered a major blow after federal Liberals backed a “resounding no” to the proposal and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton vowed to campaign against the change at a referendum later this year. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese conceded the Liberal Party decision would put the case for the Voice at risk of defeat, as Indigenous leaders warned the outcome would damage the attempt to improve the lives of First Australians.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670382

#28 - Part 39

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 11

>>18650626 Liberal leaders refuse to join Dutton’s ‘no’ campaign on voice - The highest-ranking Liberal in office, Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff, says he will campaign “vigorously” for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice to parliament as state Liberal leaders refuse to join Peter Dutton’s No campaign. Two state Liberal leaders will support the Yes campaign ahead of the national referendum, two say they have an “open mind” about the voice and none has declared support for the federal Opposition Leader’s position.

>>18650639 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should lament bipartisan fail on the Indigenous voice parliament - "Newspoll was sobering reading for hardheads who want to see a voice to parliament, not just bear witness to the Prime Minister’s approach of crash or crash through. It revealed support far below that for marriage equality and nowhere near the level of the 1967 referendum to give First Nations people the vote. The reality is those saying they are undecided are more than likely No voters who prefer not be called racists. Newspoll showed Albanese’s voice is already lost in Queensland and is on life support in Western Australia. Sure, Victoria is holding strong, but the reality is Tasmania is the swing state in this referendum, the only state with a Liberal government." - Cameron Milner - theaustralian.com.au

>>18650675 ‘The decision was tough’: Former Indigenous minister Ken Wyatt quits Liberals in Voice protest - Former Coalition Indigenous affairs minister Ken Wyatt has quit the Liberal Party to protest against its rejection of the Voice to parliament. The resignation of the senior Liberal figure, the first Indigenous Australian elected to the House of Representatives, has underscored anxieties within the party over the way Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s alternative model, which would to symbolically recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution without a Voice advisory body, was pushed through following Saturday’s Aston byelection defeat.

>>18659974 Indigenous voice to parliament to change democracy, warns Peter Dutton - Peter Dutton says Anthony Albanese’s voice to parliament will change Australian democracy, ­require thousands of public servants to be hired and cost billions to “run a new arm of the government” without improving outcomes for Indigenous Australians. The Opposition Leader has launched his political offensive to sink the voice after formally binding his frontbench to the No case and will make any government ­refusal to answer questions on the operation of the proposed advisory body a key feature of his campaign.

>>18660016 Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament an offensive vanity project - "Australians are being asked to change the Constitution in the most significant way since it was created at the time of Federation. However, unlike any time in our history, the Prime Minister of the day is asking people to vote for the voice on the vibe. There has been no constitutional convention – as has occurred in the past – to thrash out the proposal. In fact, the Prime Minister quite proudly says he is not providing the detail Australians are reasonably asking for. And his approach is dividing the nation." - Peter Dutton, federal Liberal leader - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670384

#28 - Part 40

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition

>>18478838 'Time is running out': PM urged to stand up for Assange - Julian Assange supporters are urging Anthony Albanese to grasp a crucial opportunity to secure his release in a "litmus test" for democracy. A public artwork of Assange and fellow whistleblowers Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning was unveiled in Sydney on Friday. Speaking at the event, former journalist Dean Yates pleaded with the prime minister to lobby on behalf of the detained Australian during an upcoming meeting with Joe Biden and Britain's Rishi Sunak. "Time is running out," he told AAP, arguing the upcoming US election cycle would shatter any chance of a favourable resolution. "There is a growing sense amongst Australians that enough's enough - Albanese said that himself. It's time for him to use his personal relationship with President Biden and bring Julian home."

>>18491402 'Transcends politics': The unlikely group of Australian politicians rallying behind Julian Assange - A cross-section of Australian politicians are calling for Julian Assange's return to Australia. His father John Shipton says he doesn't have hope, but faith, that it will happen.

>>18537874 MP renews call for Assange release on war anniversary - On the 20th anniversary of the beginning of the Iraq War, an independent MP has spotlighted the role Julian Assange played in revealing its horrors. Mr Assange is facing espionage charges in the United States and remains in London's Belmarsh prison, held there since 2019 while fighting extradition proceedings. "It's only because of Mr Assange and WikiLeaks that the world knows of some of the shocking war crimes committed by the United States in Iraq, and for the US to be pursuing him the way they are is simply unconscionable."

>>18622326 Australia's new High Commissioner to the UK, Stephen Smith, speaks on Julian Assange, AUKUS and climate change - The new high commissioner said Mr Assange's father, John Shipton, who has been a tireless advocate for his son's release, asked him if he would visit the prison where the 51-year-old has been locked up for nearly four years. "His father approached me as the new high commissioner, asking if I would visit him. Through his lawyers, Mr Assange agreed to that visit," Mr Smith said. "We had previously, before my time, made over 40 requests to see Mr Assange for consular purposes. None of those requests were taken up."

>>18644321 High Commissioner Stephen Smith visits Julian Assange in prison as NGO Reporters Without Borders turned away - Australia's High Commissioner to the United Kingdom Stephen Smith has visited WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in prison in London. It's the first time Australia's top diplomat in the UK has visited Mr Assange since he was locked up in Belmarsh Prison nearly four years ago. In a dramatic day outside the prison, press freedom organisation Reporters Without Borders (RSF) was denied access to Mr Assange. It would have been the first time an NGO had been granted visitation rights to the WikiLeaks publisher inside Belmarsh Prison, but RSF's representatives were turned away at the last moment.

>>18644328 Albanese Albanese ‘encouraged envoy to visit Julian Assange’ - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he had encouraged Australia’s envoy Stephen Smith to visit Julian Assange who is being held on remand in Belmarsh jail in London fighting extradition to the United States. Mr Smith, Australia’s High Commissioner to the United Kingdom on Tuesday saw Assange, 51, who is appealing a British High Court-approved extradition to the US to face 17 espionage charges and one of computer hacking in relation to the release of hundreds of thousands of US documents and cables in 2010 and 2011.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670388

#28 - Part 41

Australia / China Tensions - Part 1

>>18422759 White House gives federal agencies 30 days to purge TikTok - The White House has given US federal agencies 30 days to purge Chinese-owned video-snippet sharing app TikTok from all government-issued devices, setting a deadline to comply with a ban ordered by the US congress - Owned by Chinese tech giant ByteDance, TikTok has become a political target due to concerns the globally popular app can be circumvented for spying or propaganda by the Chinese Communist Party.

>>18422963 ‘Stop rehashing the lab leak narrative’: Beijing responds to Department of Energy’s coronavirus origin claims - Beijing has dismissed recent developments that point to COVID-19 leaking from a laboratory, calling for “certain parties” to stop smearing China - China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning said the virus should not be used as a political weapon.

>>18422988 Through the looking-glass of Keating policy - "How often has Keating ever criticised Beijing? Did he lend his grandeur to condemning the rape of Hong Kong, the persecution of Uighur Muslims, the imprisonment of human rights lawyers, the imprisonment of Australians on trumped-up charges, the persecution of Christians or of independent trade unionists? Has he ever expressed opposition to Beijing’s aggression in the South China Sea? Is he at all worried about Beijing’s massive military build-up, its program to build nuclear weapons faster than any other nation, the continuous cyber attacks on Australia, the relentless efforts to interfere in Western politics as recently revealed by the security agencies of the government of that well-known right-wing extremist, Justin Trudeau, and so on? If Keating really wants to find someone who routinely argues another nation’s case against the Australian strategic mainstream, he need look no further than the mirror." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18427715 ‘Fearing young person’s app’: US-China TikTok clash escalates - China says the United States is overstretching the concept of national security, abusing state power to suppress foreign companies after the White House gave government agencies 30 days to remove Chinese-owned app TikTok on federal devices - “We firmly oppose those wrong actions,” said Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning - “How unsure of itself can the US, the world’s top superpower, be to fear a young person’s favourite app to such a degree?”

>>18427738 National security chiefs focus on TikTok risks - The Australian government is looking to the nation's top security agencies to determine if any actions should be taken against popular social media app TikTok - Treasurer Jim Chalmers says the government and security agencies are aware of the White House's actions, with a new directive giving all US federal agencies 30 days to wipe the app off government devices.

>>18427751 Japan ups military ties with UK and Australia, worsening Asia-Pacific security - Japan's Cabinet on Tuesday approved the previously signed reciprocal access agreements (RAA) with the UK and Australia, signaling Japan's ambition to diversify its defense partnership and expand militarily. - Zhang Han - globaltimes.cn

>>18427776 Former Top Gun pilot refuses to be sent to infamous prison among paedophiles - Daniel Edmund Duggan has been held at the maximum security Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre in Sydney’s western suburbs since his arrest in October last year - It is alleged he trained Chinese fighter pilots to land fighter jets on aircraft carriers through a flying academy in South Africa between 2010 and 2012 - NSW Corrective Services this week offered to move Mr Duggan to the infamous bone yard at Silverwater Correctional Centre, which is home to paedophiles and other convicted criminals who need to be “protected” from other inmates.

>>18432782 British Air Force Chief details joint efforts with Australia to stop China poaching retired fighter pilots - The visiting head of Britain's Royal Air Force has detailed how he's worked with Australia to prevent former fighter pilots from taking lucrative training jobs with the Chinese military - "We made the decision to go public on this in a very loud, clear way, that it's unacceptable and it's something that we were prepared to call China out [on] publicly," Air Chief Marshal Wigston told the ABC - Last month, the head of ASIO confirmed Australian veterans had been targeted by other nations and hit out at those personnel who had put "cash before country" by working for authoritarian regimes, describing them as "top tools" more than "top guns".

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670391

#28 - Part 42

Australia / China Tensions - Part 2

>>18438361 Quad tells China to follow the rules - China has no reason to fear the Quad, say the top diplomats of Japan, Australia, India and the US, so long as Beijing “abides by” international rules - Speaking on a panel with her Quad counterparts at a geopolitics summit held on the sidelines of the G20 in New Delhi on Friday, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the Quad was a “lighthouse” that “enables choices” for countries in the Indo-Pacific - Japan’s Foreign Minister, Yoshimasa Hayashi, said China should not feel threatened by the group - “We don’t try to exclude anybody. This is open architecture. So one thing we would like to say is, just abide by the law of international ruling institutions. And as long as China abides by … the international institutions, standards and rules, then this is not a conflicting issue between China and the Quad.”

>>18449420 Daniel Duggan says he faces ‘gross injustice’ if extradited to US in speech from Sydney prison - In a speech from prison, the Australian pilot Daniel Duggan has said he faces a “gross injustice” if extradited to the US and, potentially, a “cruelly long sentence”, warning Australia against acquiescing to the demands of powerful countries - The address, dictated by Duggan from his prison cell to his legal team, and read on his behalf on Saturday night in Sydney, urged his audience to “say no to Australia being a political lackey to any foreign government, as allies can be dangerous too” - “Stand and say no to politically charged extraditions of Australian citizens, who surely face gross injustice and cruelly long sentences if approved – setting a dangerous precedent for future generations of Australians,” he said - Duggan, a former US marine pilot now naturalised Australian, was arrested last October at the request of the US government, which is seeking his extradition on charges of arms trafficking and money laundering, arising from his alleged training of Chinese fighter pilots, more than a decade ago. The allegations have not been tested in court.

>>18454274 TikTok banned by 25 government departments and agencies - Chinese-owned viral video app TikTok has been banned from work-issued devices by 25 federal agencies and departments, including Foreign Affairs and Trade, Prime Minister and Cabinet, and Finance, as an investigation by Home Affairs into social media and what action the government should take nears completion.

>>18454298 Warning improved Australia-China relations not end to cyber interference - China has used the election of a new government to seek to ­improve the perception of Beijing for ordinary Australians, while continuing steady cyber interference behind the scenes, the former head of the powerful US National Security Agency, Mike Rogers, has warned.

>>18460409 Video - China won't ‘automatically’ change cyber behaviour as dialogue with Australia increases - As the dialogue between Australia and China increases, people should not think Beijing will automatically change its cyber behaviour, former US National Security Agency Chief Admiral Michael Rogers warns. “The challenge is how does a strong China integrate itself into the broader global community in which it respects the rule of law as well as the norms of behaviour that we have developed over the last 70 years.” - Sky News Australia

>>18460443 Billions more in military spending won’t be enough to counter China: Morrison - Former prime minister Scott Morrison has argued Australia’s military spending should increase by billions of dollars a year to counter China. Morrison, whose firm stance towards China’s increasing assertiveness in the region led to retaliatory trade strikes and a diplomatic standoff, stated defence spending should grow from just under 2 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent or more.

>>18460470 Australian universities schooling Chinese students in cyber warfare tactics - As universities cash in on partnerships with Chinese institutions to teach information technology courses, industry specialists fear they are “sabotaging’’ efforts to shield Australian banks and infrastructure from offshore cyber attacks.

>>18466704 China invasion forecasts questionable, says Scott Morrison - Scott Morrison says US military timelines about when China might invade Taiwan should be taken “with a grain of salt” as Xi Jinping increasingly encounters a region that is “resisting” Chinese hegemony.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670395

#28 - Part 43

Australia / China Tensions - Part 3

>>18466727 Australian media wages propaganda war against China; Canberra faces an uphill battle in terms of a reset of ties with China: experts - One has to admire China for its forbearance in seeking to maintain the bilateral relationship when Australia has been behaving like a petulant child, experts agreed at an online forum on China-Australia relations held by Global Times on Monday. Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18468947 The Perth Mint responds to an ABC Four Corners program on 6 March 2023 which alleged that The Perth Mint could face a potential recall of $9 billion worth of ‘doped’ one-kilogram gold bars from customers in China.

>>18511456 NSW government considers banning TikTok on all public sector devices - The New South Wales government is considering banning public sector employees from using TikTok on work devices, engaging federal cybersecurity agencies for advice amid concerns over the social video app’s links to China. As the federal government considers the security of the app, the NSW electoral commission has confirmed software – including TikTok – is not permitted to be downloaded on to work mobile phones without prior approval.

>>18511493 Rupert Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch open Murdoch Centre in New York - Rupert Murdoch has invoked a “belligerent China” as a reason for the US and Australia to grow their close relationship as he spoke at the opening of a special centre dedicated to promoting the relationship between the two allies in New York. Alongside his son Lachlan, US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy and Australian ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos, Mr Murdoch launched a centre in New York City to promote relations between Australia and the US, funded by grants from News Corp, Fox Corporation and Australian businessman Anthony Pratt, who was also at the event.

>>18517160 US tells TikTok’s Chinese owners sell up or get banned - The Biden administration has demanded that TikTok’s Chinese owners divest their stakes in the popular video app or face a possible US ban, the company says. The move, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, is the most dramatic in a series of recent steps by US officials and legislators who have raised fears that TikTok’s US user data could be passed on to China’s government. ByteDance-owned TikTok has more than 100 million US users. It is the first time under the administration of President Joe Biden that a potential ban on TikTok has been threatened. Biden’s predecessor, Republican Donald Trump, had tried to ban TikTok in 2020 but was blocked by the courts.

>>18517169 Albanese government watches as Joe Biden moves on TikTok - The Albanese government is watching closely as the Biden administration takes on TikTok, demanding the Chinese social media company sell the app or face a ban in the US. The move comes as Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil awaits a report from her department on the ubiquitous social media service, which analysts warn collects more personal information on users than any comparable app. Liberal Senator James Paterson, who is chairing a select committee inquiry on foreign interference through social media, said the Albanese government needed to ensure that TikTok’s Chinese owner ByteDance didn’t come up with a fix to US complaints that left Australian users exposed.

>>18524065 Warrant used in raid of alleged Chinese pilot trainer ‘invalid’, court hears - An Australian Federal Police raid on the home of a former fighter pilot who is being investigated for his involvement in the alleged training of the Chinese military should be declared invalid due to the “debilitating ambiguity” of the warrant used, a court has heard. Keith Hartley has lodged a Federal Court filing to seek an order that the warrant used to search his Adelaide home last year be deemed void and an injunction preventing the AFP from “accessing, reviewing, divulging” the seized material.

>>18538123 Video: Former 'Top Gun' pilot accused of helping China moved to Australian maximum security jail - A former US fighter pilot who became an Australian citizen and is accused of helping train Chinese military pilots has been moved to a maximum security prison in New South Wales ahead of his next court appearance. Daniel Duggan, 54, was arrested in October last year near his family home in Orange, in NSW, and was accused of providing military training to pilots working for China. Duggan was moved from Silverwater jail in Sydney to Lithgow maximum security prison. His family and supporters insist he should be granted bail or released into home detention because he does not represent a flight risk.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670396

#28 - Part 44

Australia / China Tensions - Part 4

>>18543933 TikTok shock: ‘You can cough up your sources to the Chinese government in a heartbeat’ - Journalists risk putting their confidential sources and contacts in jeopardy by using TikTok on their devices and should think twice about using the Chinese-owned video app, experts say. Cyber safety expert Susan McLean told The Australian that TikTok was “one of the worst platforms for harvesting data”, saying it allowed a user’s information to be “sent back to China”.

>>18543953 Clare O’Neil handed security review into whether to ban TikTok on government devices - A security review into social media has been handed to Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil and is widely expected to recommend a ban on the TikTok app across government devices in line with the US and UK.

>>18544074 Lawyers investigating if fighter pilot Daniel Duggan was 'lured back' to Australia by US authorities - Lawyers for a former US fighter pilot accused of helping train Chinese military counterparts are investigating whether he was "lured" back to Australia by the United States, with cooperation from Australian security agencies, so he could be extradited.

>>18558189 Wife of former Top Gun pilot accused of training Chinese appeals to NSW political leaders - The family of an Australian father accused of training Chinese military pilots and held in a maximum security prison has appealed to New South Wales political leaders ahead of the state election. Daniel Duggan, 54, a former US Marines Corps pilot, was arrested in October last year near his family home in Orange, in NSW, and accused of providing military training to pilots working for China. His wife, Saffrine, today called on all NSW political parties to commit to placing her husband in home detention while he defends the hotly opposed extradition matter and farewells his dying 95-year-old mother, who suffered a stroke in Boston yesterday.

>>18558206 Pilot's family calls on NSW to back home detention bid - The wife of a former United States pilot incarcerated in NSW wants him moved to home detention while he contests extradition and farewells his dying mother. Daniel Edmund Duggan, 54, was last week moved from Sydney's Silverwater remand centre to a maximum security prison in Lithgow, predominantly holding sentenced offenders. "Dan is no danger to anyone nor a flight risk, but he is in potential danger in prison with terrorists and other hardened criminals," his wife Saffrine said

>>18564917 OPINION: Taiwan will be ours, but war with Australia is a fallacy - "Taiwan is part of China’s territory. Taiwan has belonged to China since ancient times. Starting from the Song and Yuan dynasties, the imperial central governments of China all set up administrative bodies to exercise jurisdiction over Penghu and Taiwan. National reunification by peaceful means is the first choice of the Chinese government in resolving the Taiwan question, as it best serves the interests of the Chinese nation as a whole, including our compatriots in Taiwan, and it works best for the long-term stability and development of China. We will work with the greatest sincerity and exert our utmost efforts to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification, and create a broad space for peaceful reunification, but we will not leave any room for any form of “Taiwan independence” separatist activities. To guard against external interference and all separatist activities, we will not renounce the use of force, and we reserve the option of taking all necessary measures." - Xiao Qian, Ambassador of the People's Republic of China to Australia - smh.com.au

>>18565029 Sophisticated surveillance tool’: US regulator calls for Australian TikTok ban - One of the United States’ top technology regulators has urged Australia to ban TikTok in its current form, arguing the wildly popular Chinese-owned app is a sophisticated surveillance tool that poses a uniquely troubling national security threat. The Albanese government will announce a ban on the use of TikTok on government-provided devices this week, a move US Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr described as the “lowest of the low-hanging fruit” when it comes to regulation of the video-sharing app. Carr, one of four members of the federal agency responsible for implementing and enforcing American communications law, told The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age: “There are more red flags about TikTok than at a Chinese Communist Party parade.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670397

#28 - Part 45

Australia / China Tensions - Part 5

>>18565062 Former fighter pilot imprisoned in NSW on US extradition request unable to attend mother’s funeral - Daniel Duggan, the Australian pilot fighting an extradition request from the US from prison, will not be able to attend his mother’s funeral, after she died in the US. Duggan’s 95-year-old mother, Anne, suffered a stroke earlier this week, and died overnight Wednesday in Boston. Duggan, currently held in segregation in Lithgow prison, was only able to speak to his mother once briefly after she fell ill, when a family member held a phone to her ear. “Dan is devastated that he is locked in solitary confinement in Lithgow prison and not with his family when his mother fell ill and died,’’ Duggan’s wife, Saffrine Duggan, said.

>>18577172 OPINION: Beware of dangerous disinformation. Taiwan is not part of China - "Writing for this masthead on Thursday, China’s Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian made a series of misleading claims about Taiwan. By twisting history and ignoring key details, the Ambassador told a deceptive story about the world accepting Beijing’s view that Taiwan rightfully belongs to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). China’s control of Taiwan has been shorter and patchier than the ambassador claims. And although past Chinese dynasties like the Ming and Qing exercised incomplete influence and control over Taiwan, the island has never been ruled by the PRC." - Benjamin Herscovitch, International security researcher - theage.com.au

>>18577208 Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews planning imminent China trade trip - Premier Daniel Andrews is planning an imminent trade mission to China. The visit would make him the first Australian politician to visit the country since the signing of the AUKUS defence agreement. Although the state government has kept DFAT informed of its plans, the trip – which could occur within days – will cause some unease in Canberra considering the history of Victoria’s previous Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) agreements with China, which the former Coalition government cancelled.

>>18577222 Spy watchdog launches inquiry into former ‘Top Gun’ pilot’s arrest - Former top gun pilot Daniel Duggan’s legal team is calling for his immediate release from a NSW prison after they were informed by the nation’s spy watchdog that it had launched a formal inquiry into the events leading up to his arrest. Duggan’s lawyer, Dennis Miralis, said the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) informed him on March 21 that it had launched a formal inquiry which has the standing powers of a royal commission, including the ability to compel witnesses to give evidence and seizing documents.

>>18577228 Lawyers call for pilot's release citing agency probe - Lawyers representing a former United States pilot incarcerated in NSW has called for his immediate release, saying Australia's intelligence watchdog is investigating his case. The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security informed lawyers for Daniel Edmund Duggan it had launched a formal inquiry into the matter, solicitor Dennis Miralis said. It follows a complaint to the watchdog on Duggan's behalf in which his representatives alleged the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation might have been involved in luring the pilot to the country so he could be arrested and ultimately extradited to the US.

>>18583016 Daniel Andrews bans media on China trip - "Why is Victorian Premier Dan Andrews allowing no Australian media on his hurriedly announced trip to China on Monday night? It seems to be a case of Chairman Dan adopting the Chinese government culture of explaining as little as possible to the public. The trip was revealed with the sort of military precision and secrecy the Chinese Communist Party is famous for. The tour was revealed through the Sunday newspapers – little more than 24 hours before Andrews actually jets out. And it was announced without a list of the Chinese officials Andrews plans to meet." - Nick Tabakoff - theaustralian.com.au

>>18583024 China-bound Andrews told to stay in his lane amid call for trip transparency - Daniel Andrews has defended the nature and timing of his surprise visit to China, just weeks after the federal government signed the AUKUS security pact, and while questions remain about the identities of those the Victorian premier will meet on his seventh official visit to the country. Shadow foreign minister Simon Birmingham said while every premier was entitled to undertake trade missions, state leaders should “stay in their lanes”. “Premiers should ensure they are briefed, where appropriate, on national security sensitivities,” Birmingham said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670399

#28 - Part 46

Australia / China Tensions - Part 6

>>18583041 How TikTok went from a popular video app to a matter of national security - The situation began changing last year when a series of articles in BuzzFeed started appearing, revealing that US user data was accessible, and had been accessed by ByteDance employees in China – contrary to what the company had been insisting for years. A month later, similar revelations started surfacing in Australia. In response to a question from the opposition’s cybersecurity spokesman, James Paterson, TikTok Australia confirmed that Australian user data was also accessible in mainland China.

>>18583052 ‘We are not China’: TikTok boss says the app is not a national security threat - TikTok’s Australian boss says the popular app, which faces growing calls to be banned or restricted, is a victim of “fearmongering” about the rise of China and does not pose a national security risk. TikTok Australian general manager Lee Hunter insisted the app’s parent company, Beijing-based ByteDance, has “no ties” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), even though the firm’s editor-in-chief also reportedly serves as its Communist Party committee secretary.

>>18588383 ‘Secret trip’: Dan Tehan demands Daniel Andrews divulge purpose of China visit - Opposition immigration spokesman Dan Tehan has called on Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews to outline the purpose of his trip to China. Mr Tehan questioned why universities and other tertiary education institutions were not accompanying the Premier on his trip if his visit was to appeal to more Chinese students. “He should clearly articulate what the purpose is, why he’s going, what are the outcomes he’s seeking to achieve for Victoria, from this secret, secret trip that he’s taking that he will not take any reporters with him on,” he said.

>>18588392 Why the secrecy on your trip to China, Daniel Andrews? - "Daniel Andrews says the key focus of his ‘‘back-to-back’’ meetings in China will be attracting more Chinese students to Melbourne. Currently, there are 42,000 Chinese students here helping to generate $14 billion in economic activity and the Premier has an ambitious target to increase this number to at least 62,000. Why then aren’t any vice-chancellors of Melbourne’s internationally renowned universities joining the Premier for his four-day mission to Beijing, Jiangsu and Sichuan province?" - Damon Johnston - theaustralian.com.au

>>18588399 Five years after Australia's reckoning with Chinese foreign interference, Canada has its moment - Canada is in the grips of a political storm over alleged foreign interference from China and as it bears down, one government MP has resigned from the caucus and there are renewed calls for Australian-style laws targeting overseas meddling. After anonymous intelligence sources made a series of claims alleging the Chinese government had meddled in two national elections and a mayoral race, a majority of Canada's House of Commons voted for an inquiry into foreign interference.

>>18594130 Premier should raise plight of jailed journalist Cheng Lei on China trip, partner says - Nick Coyle, partner of an Australian journalist detained in China says he is disappointed that Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has said he won’t raise her plight while on a trade mission to the country this week. Chinese-born television anchor Cheng Lei, who moved to Melbourne with her family when she was a child, has been imprisoned in China for more than two years after being charged with “illegally supplying state secrets overseas”. Australian authorities have repeatedly questioned the lack of transparency with the legal process in Cheng’s case.

>>18594141 Video: Daniel Andrews meets Chinese officials to launch controversial trip - Premier Daniel Andrews has met with Australian and Victorian government representatives in China, the Chinese Education Minister and the Mayor of Beijing. In a brief announcement released on Tuesday on the first day of a four-day trip to China, the Premier’s office said the small Victorian delegation also met with Li Xukui, the vice-president of the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries.

>>18594180 Video: Schedule for Andrews trip to China released - The schedule for Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews' visit to China has been released. According to the schedule Andrews will meet Brett Stevens, Commissioner for Victoria to Greater China, Graham Fletcher, Australian Ambassador to China, Li Xukui, Vice President, Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, Huai Jinpeng, Minister of Education and Dr Yin Yong, Mayor of Beijing. The Andrews government has faced criticism over its decision not to bring Victorian journalists on the trip.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670400

#28 - Part 47

Australia / China Tensions - Part 7

>>18594198 PhoenixTV Tweet: (Google Translation:) The first Australian governor to visit China after the easing of Sino-Australian relations. Governor of Victoria: The Chinese story is definitely the core of the Victorian story.

>>18594202 Belittling China-Australia economic complementarity shows the West’s anxiety - "As long as the Australian side adheres to the pragmatic spirit, we believe China-Australia economic cooperation can achieve healthy development. A sound and steady development of bilateral relationship serves the fundamental interests of the two peoples and contributes to the prosperity of the Australian economy." - Hu Weijia - globaltimes.cn

>>18600013 Comrade Dan sends CCP the wrong message - "His avowed aim is “making sure we have as many students coming to Melbourne as possible”, though he is taking no vice-chancellors with him. What of the abundant evidence that Confucius Institutes on Australian campuses were set up as centres for the propagation of CCP ideology and that Chinese consulates around the country monitor and at times mobilise Chinese students for political purposes? As many as possible? On what terms, precisely?" - Paul Monk, author of Thunder From the Silent Zone: Rethinking China - theaustralian.com.au

>>18600024 Forrest insists China is not a national security threat - Mining billionaire Andrew Forrest claims China does not pose a national security threat and is no more protectionist than Australia or the United States, and that the countries should put aside their political differences to co-ordinate on climate change.

>>18606842 Don’t mention China: Anthony Albanese warned on TikTok - Senior officials in the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet had raised potential diplomatic risks over the government’s security review into social media apps including TikTok, warning it could be taken as targeting Chinese companies. An internal departmental “messaging” document provided to the Prime Minister’s office, obtained by The Australian, advised the government to adopt a country “agnostic” approach to the review, with other Western nations moving towards government bans on the Chinese-owned platform.

>>18606851 Beijing lauds Andrews’ ‘determination’ to build China relationship - China’s Foreign Affairs Ministry, education minister and one of its top international influence organisations have heaped praise on Premier Daniel Andrews amid warnings that his tightly guarded tour could split Victorian and national interests. After meetings in Beijing on Tuesday and Wednesday, Andrews was lauded for “the firm determination of the premier himself and Victoria to persist in developing relations with China” after years of acrimony between Canberra and Beijing over human rights, national security and $20 billion in trade strikes that still affect some industries.

>>18613039 EU chief warns members not to fall into Australia’s trap with China - The head of the European Commission has used a landmark speech to warn member nations they must alter their relationship with China or risk becoming a victim of the same economic coercion currently imposed on Australia. Ursula von der Leyen said the Chinese Communist Party was seeking to make the world – including Russia – dependent on China.

>>18613051 Another sign Sino-Australian ties reviving: China Daily editorial - "In another sign of improved Sino-Australian relations, Daniel Andrews, premier of Victoria state, is on a six-day visit to China that started on Monday, becoming the first of Australia's state leaders to visit the country since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Hopefully Canberra will strive to maintain the momentum of improved relations with China by working with Beijing to push the two countries' highly complementary trade relations, as well as people-to-people and cultural exchanges forward to deliver more significant benefits to both sides." - chinadaily.com.cn

>>18613067 Australia concerned journalist still awaits verdict in China - Australia remains deeply concerned that Australian journalist Cheng Lei has not learned of a verdict a year after standing trial in China on national security charges, the foreign minister said on Friday. Foreign Minister Penny Wong marked the first anniversary of the closed trial in Beijing with a statement that said her government had “advocated at every opportunity for Ms. Cheng to be reunited with her family.”

>>18625649 Daniel Andrews returns from media-free China trip as opposition vows to pursue unanswered questions - The Victorian premier Daniel Andrews says it was his decision not to invite journalists or key stakeholders on his four-day trip to China and has batted off criticism he had failed to be transparent about the visit.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670402

#28 - Part 48

Australia / China Tensions - Part 8

>>18625659 ‘Not a secret visit’: WA premier plans trade trip to ‘reconnect’ with China - West Australian Premier Mark McGowan will lead a five-day trade mission to China to reconnect with the state’s largest trading partner – and unlike his Victorian counterpart, he’s taking the media. Beginning on April 17, the first trade mission since the start of the coronavirus pandemic will include high-level meetings with key central government and industry leaders in energy, resources, science and innovation, international education and aviation.

>>18631247 New frontier for China-Australia relations: ambassador - China’s ambassador to Australia says his country would be interested in investing in landmark events such as the Brisbane 2032 Olympics as part of a “new frontier” in bilateral trade and investment relations that will span renewable energy, manufacturing and green technology. Xiao Qian told The Australian during a visit to Brisbane last week that after five years of “turbulence and zigzags” in bilateral relations the environment was rapidly improving.

>>18631258 ‘Rogue’ climate change agency stands firm over Chinese-made cameras - One of Australia’s climate change and energy agencies ignored the example set by the Department of Defence and has not removed Chinese-made surveillance cameras from its facilities. Despite the majority of federal agencies deciding to purge the cameras, one agency in the Department of Climate Change and Energy stood firm. Twenty-four hours after The Australian contacted Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen’s office about why the devices had not been removed, the department had a change of heart and issued a follow-up statement. "All agencies within the portfolio have now confirmed they intend to replace or remove the devices by September 2023."

>>18637716 Anthony Albanese signs off on TikTok ban on government devices after top security review - Anthony Albanese has signed off on a government-wide ban on the use of social media app TikTok following a review by the Department of Home Affairs into the security risks of the Chinese-owned platform. The ban will apply to all government and department-issued devices operated by politicians and public servants in the wake of security concerns that it poses an espionage risk. It is understood state and territory governments were briefed on the ban by the Commonwealth on Monday, and are expected to follow suit with similar bans. However, a broader ban on the app in the private domain, as is being considered in the US, would not be applied.

>>18637732 TikTok banned: Chinese video app’s aggressive, invasive data-harvesting would shock most users - On its surface, TikTok might seem like any other social media app. Its wildly entertaining short-form videos are similar to those you‘d find on Instagram, its filters and effects are as zany as those you might find on Snapchat. But underneath the buzzy exterior is an insidious, well-oiled data harvesting machine, designed to hoover up as much personal information as possible – including the facial and voice biometrics of its users – far more data than the app requires, or that any reasonable unassuming user might expect.

>>18637747 Dan Andrews’ gas refusal threatens US-led global order - "Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews went to China for infrastructure capital, tourists and students. But over dinner and in social conversations he almost certainly discovered how Australia and Victoria are becoming part of a Chinese energy strategy that goes way beyond the implications of latest OPEC production cuts into China’s plan to dislodge the US dollar as the world currency and lessen the ties between Japan, US and Australia. China knows that if Daniel Andrews and Canberra’s Chris Bowen hold back gas then Japan could be forced into seeking energy from China, perhaps via the future pipeline from Russia. And that gas will be priced in Chinese currency, not US dollars. The current close links between the US, Australia and Japan might just be fractured. Welcome to China, Mr Andrews." - Robert Gottliebsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18644280 China ‘lodged stern representations’ with Australia over Anthony Albanese’s TikTok ban - Beijing has made “stern representations” to Australia after Anthony Albanese signed off on a government-wide ban of the social media platform TikTok over concerns of a serious espionage risk. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning urged the “Australian side to earnestly abide by the rules of the market economy and the principles of fair competition,” revealing that Beijing had relayed its concerns to Canberra over the move.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670403

#28 - Part 49

Australia / China Tensions - Part 9

>>18644280 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on April 4, 2023 - "We noted the reports and have made solemn démarches to the Australian side. China always believes that digital security should not be used as a tool to suppress foreign companies in an overstretch of the concept of national security and abuse of state power. We urge Australia to earnestly observe the rules of market economy and the principle of fair competition, and provide a fair, transparent and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies."

>>18653905 Family pleads with premier to release fighter-pilot dad - The family of former US fighter pilot Dan Duggan have appealed directly to Premier Chris Minns in their efforts to have him released from maximum security prison. The father of six is awaiting possible extradition to the US, accused of breaking the law by training pilots for the Chinese military. Wife Saffrine Duggan urged Mr Minns and Corrections Minister Anoulack Chanthivong to release Mr Duggan into home detention while he fights the charges, which he denies. "The kids miss their dad and it's even worse at these special family times of the year, like Easter and school holidays," she said.

>>18654708 China urges Australia to create favorable atmosphere for further development of bilateral ties following TikTok ban - China's Commerce Ministry urged Australia to provide fair and just environment for all types of firms on Friday, to allow for creating a favorable environment for further development of bilateral trade ties following Canberra's move to ban video-sharing app TikTok on government devices earlier this week. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

#28 - Part 50

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

>>18423030 EXCLUSIVE: Ghislaine Maxwell was thrown in SOLITARY confinement - a tiny, grim cell where inmates are fed through a slit in the door - for 48 hours after being accused of profiting off her jailhouse interview last month - Inmates at Federal Correctional Institute Tallahassee are only allowed 'video visits' from a closely-vetted list of friends, family and lawyers - Insiders say bosses at the low-security Florida lockup launched an investigation to determine whether Maxwell had breached the terms of her 20-year federal sex trafficking sentence by selling her story to a journalist.

>>18427839 Ghislaine Maxwell seeks to throw out sex trafficking conviction in Epstein case - Ghislaine Maxwell has asked a U.S. appeals court to throw out her conviction for helping Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls, saying a slew of errors marred her trial and prosecutors made her a scapegoat because the financier was dead - "The government prosecuted Ms. Maxwell as a proxy for Jeffrey Epstein" to satisfy "public outrage" over the case, making the British socialite the target of unprecedented "vilification," Maxwell's lawyers said in a Tuesday night filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670406

#28 - Part 51

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 1

>>18427699 FBI Director Says Covid Pandemic Likely Caused by Chinese Lab Leak - FBI Director Christopher Wray said Tuesday that the Covid pandemic was probably the result of a laboratory leak in China, providing the first public confirmation of the bureau’s classified judgment of how the virus that led to the deaths of nearly seven million people worldwide first emerged

>>18438337 Covid-19 origin saga a grim tale of CCP stonewalling - "The US Department of Energy has concluded that the Covid-19 pandemic likely originated from a research accident in a Chinese lab. While the DoE asserts this conclusion with “low confidence”, it now joins the FBI, which has come to the same conclusion with confidence in the “moderate” range - We may never know what real­ly happened in Wuhan. But we do know CCP officials have a pattern of spreading disinformation about Covid and will describe surveillance airships travelling into the territory of other nations as weather balloons, with apparently no shame - To date, more than 19,000 Australians have died from Covid. While official records indicate that at least 6.9 million confirmed deaths have occurred worldwide, The Economist estimates that the real figure is two to four times higher. The US, the richest nation in the world, estimates that 1.1 million of its citizens have died - While the Australian government may have made several mistakes during the pandemic, urging China to be transparent was not one of them." - Claire Lehmann - theaustralian.com.au

>>18438457 In the Philippines, terrible crimes against children are often facilitated by their mothers - In 2020, as COVID-19 spread and millions became confined to their homes, reports of online sexual abuse and exploitation of children in the Philippines more than doubled. Many of the predators are Australians - In response, the Philippines government last year declared "war" on the crime and vowed to ramp up efforts to arrest perpetrators and rescue child victims - The Philippine Internet Crimes Against Children Center is made up of experts and police from the Philippines, Australia, the UK, the Netherlands and the US - Its mission is to help local authorities hunt down the facilitators and to locate abused children, often by gathering leads and information from foreign police agencies.

>>18454236 Donald J. Trump Truth: Three years ago, I declared that COVID-19 almost certainly came from the Chinese Wuhan lab. Now, the world is finally admitting the truth. The cover-up of COVID-19's origins is one of the greatest scandals in the history of the world. Millions of people all over the planet have died from the China Virus. Now it's time to hold China—and the corrupt forces who have facilitated this colossal suppression of facts—accountable for the damage they have inflicted upon all of humanity.

>>18454236 Donald J. Trump Truth: “PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP: The world has finally woken to the truth about the Wuhan virus. Now it's time to hold China to account” - dailymail.co.uk

>>18454240 DONALD J TRUMP: The world has finally woken to the truth about the Wuhan virus. Now it’s time to hold China to account - DONALD J. TRUMP, 5 March 2023 - dailymail.co.uk

>>18454256 POMPEO: It Was a Lab Leak - "The Department of Energy this week announced what many of us have known since the earliest days of the pandemic: COVID-19 leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan. This new determination is yet another step toward dispelling the unlikely claim – once treated as the gospel-truth by the mainstream media – that the coronavirus was transmitted from an animal to a human, rather than made in a Chinese Communist Party-run lab. - If this virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, how can we be sure such a calamity will not befall the world again? The American people deserve answers – at the very least, the Biden Administration should declassify any information it can that led the Department of Energy to change its conclusion. Failure to do so will only further confirm this Administration’s shameful reluctance to confront the Chinese Communist Party." - Mike Pompeo - aclj.org

>>18466592 QDOS documents: Victorian Labor’s secret polling for Daniel Andrews during Covid pandemic revealed - Daniel Andrews used a secret ­taxpayer-funded program to monitor Victorians’ views about his personal performance during the state’s 112-day pandemic lockdown, with the Premier’s top ­political strategist briefing cabinet on the results. The Premier’s Private Office largely controlled the operation by QDOS, a firm owned and operated by veteran Labor and Andrews strategist John Armitage.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670407

#28 - Part 52

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 2

>>18466608 QDOS documents: Daniel Andrews defends taxpayer-funded lockdown polling - Daniel Andrews has defended spending taxpayers’ money on secret polling to monitor Victorians’ views on his personal performance during his government’s 112-day Covid lockdown by claiming that it is necessary to “test” public opinion “to make sure that you’ve got your messaging right”.

>>18472576 China COVID testing travel requirements to be scrapped - International arrivals into Australia from China will no longer need to prove a negative COVID-19 test, after the federal government scrapped travel requirements. The COVID-19 testing measures for travellers from China, Hong Kong and Macau were brought in on January 5 following fears of a new variant and a wave of infections in China. Health Minister Mark Butler said the requirements of needing a negative test to enter the country will be scrapped from Saturday March 11, after data showed COVID-19 numbers in China have peaked.

>>18504888 Locked-down Victorians asked to score Dan Andrews’ Covid-19 messages - Daniel Andrews’ political strategist conducted language surveys that tested inspirational messages with Victorians as the state battled the coronavirus pandemic. Department of Premier and Cabinet documents reveal that in December 2020, as Melbourne emerged from the 112-day lockdown, a major community survey asking people to score key messages was ordered. The message testing provides further evidence that while the government always claimed its pandemic response was based on health advice, political and strategic intelligence from the secretive QDOS monitoring program helped inform the decisions.

>>18538018 Dictator Dan turns out to be the puppet all along - "The truly frightening, and profoundly depressing, thing is that even as the evidence accumulates to show the futility of lockdowns, curfews, social distancing, QR codes, contact tracing and other contrived mechanisms to “keep us safe”; even as the cost of shutting so many businesses, paying people to hide at home, building unnecessary quarantine facilities and ramping up brutal police tactics nears half a trillion dollars; even after enforced isolation shattered mental health, particularly among children who lost vital years of schooling and socialisation; yes, even after all this suffering, you know the politicians would do it again in a heartbeat, confident that many of us would vote them back in just as eagerly." - Steve Waterson - theaustralian.com.au

>>18575000 Video: Premiers didn't keep us safe: Highest death rate & the cover-up continues - Senate 23.03.23 - Senator Gerard Rennick

>>18576551 kanekoa.substack.com Tweet: Video: Sen. Malcolm Roberts says that Australia should not cede its sovereignty to the WHO due to the organization's corruption that generates billions for its owner, Bill Gates and because Tedros is an evil "killer" tied to a terrorist organization.

>>18576551 Elon Musk Tweet: Replying to @KanekoaTheGreat - Countries should not cede authority to WHO

>>18576551 Q Post #3963 - https://twitter.com/DrTedros/status/1085559977597636609 - https://www.britannica.com/topic/Shiva - Symbolism. An informed [awake] public holds all the keys. Q

>>18582983 Amy Sedgwick followed the rules on Covid jabs – was that a fatal mistake? - "First came the pain in her feet. In the days after her Covid vaccination, Sydney student Amy Sedgwick thought the discomfort in the arches of her feet warranted a trip to the podiatrist. Sore feet seem so inconsequential compared to what came next. That pain soon turned to mild numbness that significantly ­worsened after Amy’s second Pfizer shot four weeks later. Now she had aching arms and legs, and was losing feeling in her lower limbs. Six days on, the numbness was making it difficult for Amy to stand and walk. Soon she would have to be hoisted from her bed to a wheelchair. Her vision deteriorated, her hands went numb. She was twice admitted to hospital and spent two months in a ­rehabilitation centre. Within nine months, she was dead. “Our beautiful, healthy, happy, 24-year-old daughter fell off a cliff after receiving her Pfizer vaccinations,’’ her staunchly pro-vaccination parents Sophie and Bruce Sedgwick told a federal parliamentary hearing." - Christine Middap - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670409

#28 - Part 53

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 3

>>18583004 Tales of vaccine injury were purged from the internet - "The Australian’s expose of the post-Covid vaccination death of Amy Sedgwick would have been purged from the internet if it had emerged in 2021, under pressure from US-government funded ‘information experts’ working in partnership with Silicon Valley social media giants. A ‘censorship-industrial complex’ of US taxpayer-backed NGOs, Stanford University academics worked in partnership with Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, Google (YouTube), and Pinterest to take down or flag as misinformation “stories of true vaccine side effects”, discussion of “natural immunity” and the possibility Sars-Cov2 leaked from a lab." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

>>18600092 Queensland Health withdraws QoVAX Covid-19 study funding - Queensland Health is pulling funding from a major study into the long-term effects of Covid-19 and the impact of vaccines, throwing the research trial which already has 10,000 participants into doubt. The QoVAX study, the largest of its type in Australia, is examining how people’s immune systems respond to vaccines and to the virus itself and is seen as important real-world research to help manage future Covid variants.

>>18606760 ‘This is not over’: Vaccine campaign, expanded eligibility for COVID antivirals as cases rise - Around 160,000 extra Australians will be able to access subsidised COVID antiviral treatments from Saturday April 1, as virus cases rise and the federal government launches a new ad campaign encouraging booster doses. Australians in their 60s with one severe illness risk factor will join the eligibility list for Pfizer’s oral antiviral, Paxlovid, from this weekend, when a vaccination drive is also rolled out on television, social media and billboards.

>>18631276 Media to blame for Covid vaccines’ wall of infallibility - "Throughout the pandemic criticism of masks or lockdowns was permissible, if frowned upon, but the vaccines attained an almost exalted status that ensured any critics, no matter the quality of their evidence, were unfairly disparaged as “anti-vaxxers”, “cookers” or simply ignored. Why this was so remains hard to explain, but some fault must lie with a too credulous, incurious mainstream media, naive to the political and financial forces that pushed governments to eschew the more sensible path of voluntary Covid-19 vaccination. At the very outset, compelling entire populations to take a scientifically novel vaccine, produced on a political timetable, against a disease that for the bulk of people was a bad cold, was a highly questionable policy, arguably trashing traditional medical ethics about informed consent. Yet even as it became clear throughout 2021 and 2022 that the experts pushing vaccine mandates had been wrong over and over again, “safe and effective” remained the mantra." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

>>18644348 AstraZeneca vaccine discontinued by federal government - A controversial Covid-19 vaccine, linked to a very rare but serious side-effect, has been quietly discontinued in Australia, the federal government has confirmed. The AstraZeneca Covid vaccine, sold under the brand name Vaxzevria, has not been available to the Australian public since March 20. The federal Department of Health and Aged Care confirmed the news in a statement to news.com.au, saying although the vaccine remains provisionally approved in the country, AstraZeneca has decided to “formally discontinue Vaxzevria in Australia”. According to the spokesperson, the last batch of pandemic supply stock expired on March 21, 2023.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670414

#28 - Part 54

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 1

>>18423004 Malka Leifer protested her innocence in tears as she was stood down, County Court trial hears - Malka Leifer was in tears and protesting her innocence after being stood down as school principal amid child sexual abuse allegations in 2008, Victoria's County Court has heard.

>>18427829 Alleged paedophile principal complained of ‘unfair’ sacking after abuse allegations - Alleged paedophile principal Malka Leifer complained to a friend about her “unfair” sacking, telling her “I did nothing wrong”, the Victorian County Court has heard.

>>18432761 Edmund Rice Education Australia issues apology to parents at Victorian school for failing to meet obligations under child safe standards - A multi-billion-dollar body overseeing seven Catholic schools in Victoria, including Melbourne's St Kevin's College, has written to apologise to parents after receiving a notice that it has failed to carry out its obligations under child safe standards or to demonstrate appropriate oversight of child safety - The process began in 2020 after St Kevin's and its governing body, Edmund Rice Education Australia (EREA), were referred to the Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority (VRQA) following a Four Corners investigation, Boys Club, into the school, which alleged a toxic culture that prized reputation over child safety - The notice to EREA means it must now urgently reform its governance structure and ensure its schools undergo a review by the Catholic Education Commission of Victoria.

>>18432770 Catholic church uses paedophile’s death to try to block NSW survivor’s lawsuit - The Catholic church is attempting to use the death of a paedophile, who had been jailed for the abuse of 17 children, to shield itself from further civil claims from his survivors - It has sought to capitalise on a recent decision in New South Wales’s highest court that ruled a priest’s death meant the church could not receive a fair trial in a claim brought by a woman known as GLJ - The alleged perpetrator was sentenced to a lengthy term of imprisonment for sexually assaulting 17 victims in 2015. Church lawyers attempted to interview him about his conduct but he declined, and told them he did not wish to be contacted by them or the Marist Brothers again - Marist Brothers is arguing its inability to obtain a witness statement from the alleged perpetrator, due to his death, means it cannot receive a fair trial.

>>18438457 In the Philippines, terrible crimes against children are often facilitated by their mothers - In 2020, as COVID-19 spread and millions became confined to their homes, reports of online sexual abuse and exploitation of children in the Philippines more than doubled. Many of the predators are Australians - In response, the Philippines government last year declared "war" on the crime and vowed to ramp up efforts to arrest perpetrators and rescue child victims - The Philippine Internet Crimes Against Children Center is made up of experts and police from the Philippines, Australia, the UK, the Netherlands and the US - Its mission is to help local authorities hunt down the facilitators and to locate abused children, often by gathering leads and information from foreign police agencies.

>>18438474 Video: Inside the Global Taskforce Fighting Child Sex Abuse in the Philippines - In the dead of night in Manila, police officers track down criminals responsible for delivering online child abuse to a growing number of Australian customers. This scene has played out dozens of times across the Philippines as cases hit unprecedented levels - The demand for live streaming child sexual abuse is so high in Australia that AFP officers are now based permanently in the Philippines working with an international task force investigating this distressing cyber-crime - On Foreign Correspondent reporter Stephanie March has been given exclusive access to the Filipino police and the international task force as they hunt down the abusers and rescue the children - Parents are often involved in arranging the abuse and in a frank and confronting prison cell exchange Stephanie interviews a mother accused of facilitating the abuse of her own child for money.

>>18438482 Disgraced entertainer Rolf Harris sued over alleged sexual abuse of 10-year-old girl - A woman is suing disgraced entertainer Rolf Harris for an alleged molestation in 1982 when she was a 10-year-old foster child - Harris, 92, is one of three defendants being sued by the woman alongside the State of Victoria and foster care provider OzChild.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670417

#28 - Part 55

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 2

>>18438493 Rolf Harris to fight claim he molested a 10-year-old girl - Disgraced paedophile Rolf Harris will “fight with every inch” fresh claims he molested an Australian girl in the 80s - The once-celebrated entertainer, who was jailed for three years in Britain for assaulting four teenage girls between 1968 and 1986, is accused of a sex attack on a 10-year-old ward of the state at a camp in Melbourne where Harris was to perform for two nights.

>>18454163 Malka Leifer: Not guilty verdicts on two charges against principal on technicality, court told - Former Jewish school principal Malka Leifer has been found not guilty on two charges against her due to a technicality in the law - Judge John Gamble told the jury they would no longer have to reach a verdict on two charges of indecent act with a child aged 16 or 17 - “Those charges relate to a particular charge type that only came into effect on December 1, 2006,” he said - “You have heard evidence about the timing that suggest if that offending occurred it likely occurred before that date… So I have directed verdicts of not guilty be entered on the record.”

>>18454343 ‘Parents Need To Wake Up’: Advocates Sound Alarm About Satanist After-School Clubs Sprouting Across The Country - The Satanic Temple (TST) made headlines in 2022 for fighting for the right to create after-school clubs for students and has recently been launching new groups across the country, raising concerns for religious advocates about the potential impact Satanism may have on students’ perception of faith.

>>18466749 Video: Adelaide man Samuel Joe Frost charged with child abuse crimes after after a five-year manhunt by Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the International Criminal Police Organisation (Interpol). The AFP said it was first alerted of the material back in 2018. Interpol contacted Australian authorities after it linked child exploitation images posted online to Australia. "The major breakthrough occurred last week when investigators were able to apply a new state-of-the-art technology to pinpoint a location of interest that led to the identification of the alleged offender," the AFP said. "The tenacity and determination of our highly-skilled investigators over a prolonged period of time led to this incredible breakthrough. We are relentless and will never stop our fight to bring offenders to justice and protect children, no matter how much time has passed or where they live."

>>18466778 State’s First Satan Club Opens Up At Colorado Elementary School - The Satanic Temple’s After School Club at Paonia K-8 in Colorado held its first meeting on Monday after a parent requested the club for her son. June Everett, TST campaign director for the After School Satan Club program and ordained minister of The Satanic Temple, told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the first meeting was a great success. Many religious groups have denounced the clubs, some arguing that Satanism is the “antithesis of religion” and called on parents to “wake up” to what is going on in their children’s schools. While TST has said that it only wants to be on “equal footing” with religious groups, some religious advocacy organizations claim that interpretation “undermines the credibility of religion.”

>>18472614 Lawyer for Malka Leifer tells jury alleged victim told 'blatant lies' and lacks credibility - Malka Leifer's lawyers say one of the sisters who accused her of sexual assault told "blatant lies", and is a witness who can't be relied upon. During closing arguments in Mrs Leifer's County Court sex abuse trial, defence barrister Ian Hill sought to cast doubt over a host of prosecution witnesses, including complainants Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper. The sisters have accused the former principal of the Adass Israel School, in Melbourne's inner south-east, of sexually assaulting them between 2003 and 2007, when they were teenagers.

>>18472663 Victorian commission investigating Anglican diocese’s handling of child safety complaints - Investigation follows criticism over church’s managements of complaints against Peter Hollingworth but is not specifically examining any individual matter - Victoria’s child safety commission has quietly launched an investigation into the Anglican Melbourne diocese’s handling of child safety complaints in the wake of criticism over the Peter Hollingworth case, documents show. The Anglican church has faced renewed criticism over the protracted, secretive process to potentially defrock Hollingworth, a former Brisbane archbishop and Australia’s 23rd governor general, for failing to act on child abuse allegations.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670419

#28 - Part 56

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 3

>>18472824 Diabolical liberty: after-school Satanists club threatens to sue district over ban - An after-school Satanists club in Pennsylvania is threatening to raise hell after local district leaders denied them the ability to convene on their school grounds. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sent a letter to the Saucon Valley school district demanding that they allow the After School Satan Club, or ASSC, access to school facilities in accordance with the US constitution’s first amendment right to practice religion freely. The ACLU alleges that the Satanist club was initially approved to use district facilities, but that approval was rescinded after district officials received pushback from community members. The ACLU is threatening the school district with a lawsuit on behalf of the club and the Satanic Temple if the alleged discrimination continues.

>>18478850 Alleged victims of Malka Leifer ‘unco-operative’ with court process, jury told - Malka Leifer’s barrister, Ian Hill KC, has told a jury that the three sisters who have alleged they were abused by the former ultra-Orthodox school principal have been unco-operative with the court process and have not answered questions directly or responsibly.

>>18478862 Malka Leifer’s lawyer calls on jury to reject ‘imagined’ narrative, court hears - The jury charged with rendering a verdict in an alleged principal sex abuse case should use their “common sense” to see the holes in the testimony of three sisters, her lawyer has repeatedly said. Giving his final remarks to the County Court trial of Malka Leifer, 56, barrister Ian Hill KC has sought to convince the jury the allegations are an imagined “false narrative”.

>>18478911 Marist Brothers accused of concealing Francis Cable’s crimes for decades but say they cannot receive a fair trial because they are unable obtain a witness statement from him - A Catholic order will argue it should be shielded from abuse claims relating to one of the worst paedophiles in the New South Wales Catholic school system because he is dead, despite allegedly concealing his crimes from authorities for decades. The Marist Brothers allegedly knew of child abuse complaints about Brother Francis “Romuald” Cable from at least 1967, but did nothing to either eject him from the order or inform police, court documents obtained by the Guardian show. Instead, the order is accused of shuffling him between schools under its control.

>>18491521 Former congressional candidate Kevin Dellicker: Satanists weren’t what I expected … but still shouldn’t be in schools - "I attended the Feb. 28 Saucon Valley School District Board meeting about the After School Satan Club. I’d been following the story in the news and wanted to speak out against it.....The Satanic Temple website outlines their beliefs. No, they don’t really believe in the devil, the website says. To them, the devil is just a symbol of rebellion. They are driven by reason and science. But read a little deeper, and the contradictions become apparent. The Satanic Temple’s sole authority for discerning truth is what each individual observes: “Beliefs should conform to one’s best scientific understanding of the world.” With this perspective, the ignorant, the misinformed and the misanthropic all are entitled to their own facts. Truth is simply false. Right and wrong are turned upside down.....We are falling for tricks, which is how the Bible says the real Satan operates. In the name of fairness, we accommodate those who mock religion and law while claiming the protections of both. In the name of diversity, equity and inclusion, we tolerate ideas that strike at the heart of moral authority. And, in the name of freedom, we accept all things to the point that nothing has meaning. Our children are paying the price.....Whether you believe the devil is a metaphor for rebellion or the personification of evil, he’s not somebody we want to invite into our schools. Let’s keep him out. A simple no will suffice."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670423

#28 - Part 57

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 4

>>18504894 Defence calls for not guilty in Malka Leifer abuse case - Jurors have been warned about "dangerous" witnesses as they prepare to consider their verdicts in the case of former ultra-Orthodox Jewish teacher Malka Leifer. The 56-year-old is facing 27 charges over the alleged abuse of Melbourne sisters Nicole Meyer, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper when she was principal of the Adass Israel School in the city's eastern suburbs between 2003 and 2007. Leifer's barrister, Ian Hill KC, criticised the memories and the accounts given by the three sisters during the trial and in statements to police. Mr Hill said Ms Sapper had told a detailed story about one alleged event in Melbourne but later changed the location to Israel. "It's the wrong memory combined with the detail that shows you just how dangerous some witnesses can be when recounting a narrative to you," he said.

>>18504905 ‘Truth, reliability lost’: Leifer evidence does not remove reasonable doubt, court hears - Sex abuse allegations against former ultra-Orthodox Jewish school principal Malka Leifer grew like a wildfire where truth and reliability were lost, her barrister has told a jury. Defence barrister Ian Hill, KC, finished his closing address to the jury in the Melbourne County Court on Tuesday, arguing the case against his client could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt and she should be found not guilty.

>>18511465 Archbishop claims $1.9m abuse payout to altar boy was excessive - Melbourne’s Catholic archbishop has asked a court to reduce a former altar boy’s almost $2 million sexual abuse payout as some injuries were caused outside of a paedophile priest’s horrific assaults. Archbishop Peter Comensoli has launched an appeal of a Supreme Court judge’s decision to award $1.9 million in damages to one of former priest Desmond Gannon’s victims, after he and the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne were found to be vicariously liable for the abuse. Gannon sexually assaulted the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, three times between 1968 and 1970 while the victim was an altar boy and pupil at a Catholic primary school in regional Victoria. The victim said he felt the priest had “murdered” him, and the little boy he used to be was gone forever.

>>18543974 Malka Leifer: Jurors warned not to rely on one thing in school principal sexual abuse case - The judge presiding over the sexual abuse trial of former principal Malka Leifer has warned a jury the emotional testimony of her alleged victims is not a “safe” tool to judge credibility. The jury was told there was no “normal response” to sexual offences, and they should not use the emotional nature of Ms Leifer’s accusers’ testimony as evidence of guilt.

>>18558104 Malka Leifer trial: Jury begins deliberations on allegations principal abused three sisters - Jurors in the Malka Leifer sexual abuse trial have been ordered to retire and reach a verdict following a trial which spanned seven weeks. The move came on Wednesday, March 22 2023, after Judge Mark Gamble of the Victorian County Court spent about three hours summarising submissions made by the prosecution and defence.

>>18558136 ‘It crucifies you every time’: the ‘crushing’ new tactic the church uses to block claims by abuse survivors - "Analysis of court records and in discussions with survivors and their advocates, the Guardian has found that the church is now routinely using the deaths of clergy to either have survivors’ claims thrown out or to force them to accept paltry settlement amounts. The strategy is being used even in cases where the dead priest or brother was a notorious paedophile who had previously abused other children and where the church had failed to act to remove the perpetrator. In one case it has been accused of sitting on its hands for almost two years, deliberately waiting for one of the worst Catholic school offenders in New South Wales to die without seeking any response to a new survivor’s allegations – and then using his death to argue it cannot receive a fair trial." - Christopher Knaus - theguardian.com

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670426

#28 - Part 58

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 5

>>18588402 Former Anglican priest Louis Daniels pleads guilty to abuse after extradition back to Tasmania - A man who was sexually abused as a child by a former Anglican priest told his perpetrator in court that he still could not talk to his parents about the abuse and felt ongoing shame. Convicted paedophile priest Louis Victor Daniels, 75, has pleaded guilty to two counts of persistent sexual abuse of a young person. The Supreme Court in Hobart was told Daniels was an Anglican priest and Church of England Boys' Society leader when he abused two boys over nine years between 1978 and 1987.

>>18588438 ‘It’s gutless’: clergy abuse survivors and their families outraged by legal stays that thwart cases - Victims of crimes committed by clergy such as Marist Brother ‘Romuald’ Cable speak out about handling of civil claims - The Marist Brothers Catholic order had a policy of not referring abuse complaints to police between 1962 and 1993, and keeping them out of any written record until 1983. Now the same order is among a slew of church bodies trying to use the deaths of perpetrators like Cable to thwart civil claims filed by abuse survivors.

>>18594212 NSW MP Gareth Ward pleads not guilty to rape and indecent assault with election result in balance - The New South Wales MP and former state Liberal minister Gareth Ward has pleaded not guilty to alleged sexual offences against a teenage boy and a man. Police allege that Ward indecently assaulted a 17-year-old boy at Meroo Meadow on NSW’s south coast in February 2013 and that he raped a 27-year-old man in Sydney in September 2015.

>>18594249 Video: Leifer jury reaches ‘verdict’ on some charges but told to continue deliberating on others - The jury in the high-profile case against Malka Leifer has told a court it has reached a unanimous verdict on some of the charges laid against the former ultra-Orthodox school principal accused of sexually abusing three students, but those findings have not been disclosed.

>>18600143 Leifer jury told to relax before resuming deliberations - Jurors considering verdicts in ultra-Orthodox Jewish principal Malka Leifer's sexual abuse trial have been sent home after another day of deliberations, and urged to relax. The jury of six men and six women have deliberated for just over 21 hours across six days.

>>18606727 Paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale charged with historic sex crime against boy - Australia’s most prolific paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale, currently jailed for abusing 71 victims, is set to plead guilty to another historical sex crime. The 88-year-old fronted the Ballarat Magistrates’ Court after he was charged with one count of indecent assault in November last year. According to a charge sheet released by the court, the offending occurred between July 1987 and May 1988 at St Brigid’s College, which fell within the Catholic Diocese of Ballarat. Police allege the boy, who cannot be named, was indecently assaulted by Ridsdale at the Horsham school when he touched his genitalia with his hand.

>>18613167 Leifer trial jury still out and heading for ninth day - Jurors in the trial of former ultra-Orthodox Jewish principal Malka Leifer will return to court to continue deliberations for a ninth day after being sent home.

>>18630905 Video: Former ultra-Orthodox school principal Malka Leifer found guilty of rape - Malka Leifer, the former principal of a Jewish ultra-Orthodox school in Melbourne, has been found guilty of sexually abusing two former students after a 15-year campaign for her to face justice. After a six-week trial in the County Court of Victoria, a jury on Monday found Leifer, 56, guilty of charges including rape, indecent assault and sexual penetration of a child aged 16 or 17 against two sisters, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper. But they cleared her of all charges relating to a third sister, Nicole Meyer.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670427

#28 - Part 59

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 6

>>18630935 Former school principal Malka Leifer convicted over sex abuse - For more than a decade the three sisters clung to the long-shot dream that the law would finally catch up with their former Melbourne school principal who had sexually molested them and then escaped Australia. Their quest for justice became an international saga that spanned from here to Israel and involved prime ministers, extraditions, appeals and ultimately a six week trial in Melbourne’s County Court. Now a jury has finally delivered the words that sisters Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper waited so long to hear as their former principal Malka Leifer was found guilty of 18 counts of sexual offences against them. The jury acquitted her on nine other charges.

>>18631081 Dassi Erlich Tweet: GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY!

>>18631305 Victorian court upholds ruling finding Catholic church liable for sexual abuse by paedophile priest - Victoria’s highest court has ruled that the Catholic church is vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a paedophile priest because he was a “servant of the diocese” whose role gave him the “power and intimacy” to access and abuse children. The decision by the Victorian court of appeal on Monday upholds the original landmark ruling, which, for the first time in Australia, found the church is vicariously liable for the abuse of its priests. The decision is expected to help countless other survivors achieve more significant compensation for the abuse they suffered at the hands of paedophile clergy.

>>18637760 Video: i24 English News - Manny Waks interview with Benita Levin - VoiCSA (Voice Against Child Sex Abuse) CEO, Manny Waks, interviewed regarding today's guilty verdicts in the Malka Leifer case - Apr 4, 2023

>>18637836 With Malka Leifer convicted of abuse, her victims say their lives can finally move forward - For more than a decade, three sisters have fought to have their allegations against their former school principal Malka Leifer tested in court. This week, a case that involved political and legal manoeuvres spanning the globe came to its conclusion in full view of the Australian public. Ultimately, the jury declared Leifer guilty of 18 offences, including six counts of rape, relating to Dassi and Elly. The jury found Leifer was not guilty of the charges relating to Nicole and some of the charges relating to Dassi. Speaking outside court, the sisters were unified once again. "Her abuse has held us hostage for so many years," Dassi said. "Today we can start to take that power back that she stole from us as children." While Nicole expressed disappointment Leifer was found not guilty of abusing her, she said the outcome was "bittersweet". "I believe in myself. My sisters believe in me," she said. The sisters urged all survivors of sexual abuse to "stay strong". "This will and can tear you apart and the process is re-traumatising and awful," Elly said. "But when you know your truth … the truth will prevail."

>>18637893 Malka Leifer’s secret 1.20am flight from justice - Board members of an ultra-orthodox Jewish school, a teacher, a forensic psychologist and a barrister convened an urgent meeting in the home of late businessman and elder Izzy Herzog on March 5, 2008. They were all connected to the Adass Israel School, in Elsternwick in Melbourne’s southeast. Herzog was joined by school board members Yitzhok Benedikt and Mark Ernst, barrister Norman Rosenbaum (now deceased), forensic psychologist Vicki Gordon and teacher Sharon Bromberg. Five days earlier, at least some of them knew Malka Leifer, the school’s principal and respected authority figure, had been accused of sexually abusing at least one of her students. By March 5, they all knew there could be at least nine victims. They had to act, and protect the community. Instead of reporting the information to police, they told Leifer to leave the country and paid for her ticket.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670432

#28 - Part 60

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 6

>>18637906 Malka Leifer guilty: Victoria Police probe of Adass Israel School board ‘a must’ - A child sex abuse survivor and key advocate for three Melbourne sisters who accused Malka Leifer of molesting them is urging Victoria Police to re-open its investigation into members of the Jewish community who helped the ultra-orthodox school principal escape justice for more than a decade, after buying her a ticket overseas instead of reporting the criminal allegations in 2008. Voice Against Child Sex Abuse (VoiCSA) chief Manny Waks, who has supported three of Leifer’s accusers since 2011, including by attending nearly all 74 of her extradition hearings in Israel, said he was “completely surprised” that police were not investigating the actions of the school’s leadership. “We have that civil case ruling, which clearly identifies the Adass school leadership … in being responsible for assisting Malka Leifer and evading justice by purchasing a ticket and sending her overseas,” Mr Waks said. “Based on those very basic facts, it would seem there would be sufficient information … to pursue this matter.”

>>18637931 People who allegedly helped Malka Leifer flee to Israel will not be charged - Police have closed their investigation into members of the Jewish ultra-Orthodox community who allegedly helped their former school principal and convicted sex abuser Malka Leifer to flee Australia and avoid justice for more than a decade. Police confirmed to The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald that they had looked at a number of people connected to the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick, but that the probe ended in 2018 because there was “insufficient evidence to proceed with any charges at this time”.

>>18644409 Ex-MP Milton Orkopoulos found guilty of sexually abusing boys - Disgraced former MP and twice-convicted pedophile Milton Orkopoulos is facing the prospect of spending the rest of his life in prison after he was found guilty of sexually abusing four boys. Once a powerful member of the Labor Party, Orkopoulos, 65, hung his head and closed his eyes as a jury of seven men and five women on Wednesday took less than a day to deliver an emphatic verdict. Following a District Court trial, the former minister for Aboriginal affairs was found guilty of 26 of 28 charges, including sexually abusing four young boys in the Lake Macquarie region and on NSW’s Mid North Coast from 1993 to 2003.

>>18644436 Melbourne woman placed in abusive foster home receives record $2.6m payout - A Melbourne woman has been awarded $2.6 million in compensation for the abuse and neglect she suffered in Victoria's foster care system. Law graduate Amy* was two-and-a-half months old when she was taken from her mother in an act designed to protect her from harm. Instead, she endured years of mistreatment at the hands of a foster family that eventually adopted her. "There was sexual abuse, violence, neglect, emotional abuse," she said of her time in their Melbourne home. Under a Victorian Supreme Court settlement, the state government and foster care agencies OzChild and Uniting Vic.Tas will pay Amy a combined $2.6 million, plus costs, and apologise for her treatment. "There was very strong evidence the state and the other entities who were involved in her care [had] lots of red flags, lots of complaints, lots of clear evidence of neglect and abuse," Amy's lawyer Angela Sdrinis said.

>>18644484 How three sisters overcame threats and silence to get justice against Malka Leifer - Just a few months before her death, Dalia Stone was approached by two men and instructed to tell her sisters to stop their quest for justice against Malka Leifer. The men were keen to deliver the message that if her younger sisters, Nicole Meyer, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper, continued to press the case against their former school principal, it would have an impact on their family. The explicit threat to Dalia was delivered implicitly again and again to the sisters, in the form of silence. For years, they battled the inertia and resistance of a community that prefers to manage allegations of abuse internally. “Sometimes, silence speaks such disapproval that you don’t even need words,” Nicole said. “Silence is difficult. So even if people don’t outright come up and say, don’t do it, silence speaks louder than anything.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670435

#28 - Part 61

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 8

>>18644495 Malka Leifer: Nicole Meyer ‘hopes’ other victims come forward - Nicole Meyer, one of three Melbourne sisters who accused their former principal of sexual abuse, says she hopes other alleged victims come forward after a jury found Malka Leifer guilty of rape and sexual offences against children. On Monday, the former Adass Israel School teacher was convicted of 18 of 27 charges ­relating to offending against Ms Meyer’s sisters, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich, after a six-week trial in Victoria’s County Court. All three sisters agreed the verdict vindicated their 15-year fight to have Leifer extradited from Israel after she fled Australia in 2008, but a civil judgment delivered by former Supreme Court judge Jack Rush in 2015 said there could be other victims. Ms Meyer told The Australian she could understand why they may not want to come forward but hoped they would. “I have hope that other victims will come forward in the ­future. I don’t know if that will happen … I really hope that some will,” she said. “It does completely uproot your life. I understand that side of it to.”

>>18644514 Video: Sisters say ex-principal Malka Leifer's guilty verdict 'means the world' - Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper smile when they look back at family photos. They laugh and point out expressions and hair styles. But they're exhausted. For many years their family fought to bring their former principal, Malka Leifer, to justice. It's a journey that's spanned more than a decade and includes Leifer leaving the country in the middle of the night on tickets paid for by the school. Leifer is now a convicted sex offender, found guilty of abusing youngest sister Elly and middle sister Dassi while she was principal at the Adass Israel School in Melbourne's Elsternwick.

>>18644538 Video: Elly Sapper & Nicole Meyer On The Battle For A Guilty Verdict In Case Against Malka Leifer - Australian sisters, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper, tell us about the battle they have fought for 15 years to bring their former principal, Malka Leifer, to justice. - The Project - Apr 4, 2023

>>18654449 ‘Is all in order there?’: The question Malka Leifer couldn’t overcome - In August 2007, psychologist Ruthie Casen called her friend, Sharon Bromberg, who taught at the Adass Israel School, and posed the question that would shake the tightly knit community: “Is it possible at all that Mrs Leifer has crossed any boundaries with the girls … is all in order there?” Accusations of abuse that began in a tiny religious community would result in three Melbourne sisters meeting the leaders of two nations in their quest for justice. This week they were vindicated.

>>18654602 The team of police officers who chase monsters online - For nearly 20 years Detective Sergeant Simon Fogarty of the Victoria Police has peered into a dark world most of us choose to ignore. Men, who more often than not sit behind what they hope are anonymous keyboards, watching the degradation, humiliation and physical abuse of children. He says the satisfaction comes from rescuing children and catching those behind the rackets: “I enjoy the hunt.” But this work comes at a price. We ask about the cases that stick. He pauses, then talks of the image of a little girl in an animal costume. She is wearing a dog collar. He then bursts into tears. The little girl looked a little like his daughter. “I haven’t thought of that for years,” he says. He apologises. There is no need. It is the look on her face, he says, one of fear and hopelessness. “That is what drives us. To be her voice and to make sure those who commit the abuse face justice.”

>>18665380 Ex-Cats player sues club over alleged gang rape, failing to protect him from sexual abuse - A former Geelong footballer has accused a trio of players of a historic gang rape as he sues the Cats for failing to protect him from sexual abuse. The ex-player claims he was just 15 or 16 when he was cornered in the shower at the club’s Aberdeen House, a residence for country recruits, and sexually assaulted by three older athletes in the early 1980s. The man, a prominent Indigenous Elder now in his late 50s, filed Supreme Court action against the Cats this week for a trial by jury, claiming the club had a “duty to take reasonable care of his welfare, safety and supervision” while he was living at the football house as a minor.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670438

#28 - Part 62

Qanon / Conspiracy Theory Hit Pieces, Australia and Worldwide

>>18551022 Trump to be arrested? US girds for drama - New York police tightened security Monday ahead of a possible historic indictment of Donald Trump over hush money paid to a porn actress, with the ex-president calling for mass demonstrations if he is charged.

>>18551027 Far-right activists wary of 'trap' after Trump calls for protests - Former President Donald Trump's call to supporters to protest what he said was his imminent arrest provoked conspiracy-fueled debate on far-right social media platforms on Monday, with some supporters fearing an elaborate government trap to arrest them. Trump said on his Truth Social platform he expected to be arrested this week for alleged hush money payments to a porn star during the 2016 presidential campaign and urged supporters to "protest, take our nation back!" Critics worried his comments could provoke a repeat of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, when his supporters tried to overturn his 2020 presidential election defeat.

>>18558243 Law enforcement not expecting possible Trump arraignment until next week - Former President Donald Trump is not expected to be arraigned until next week if he’s indicted over an alleged hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels. It is believed that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is looking into charging the 45th president with falsifying business records and conspiracy to violate campaign finance law related to his reimbursement of $US130,000 to his former fixer Michael Cohen for the alleged hush money payment to Ms Daniels in 2016, just before the presidential election.

>>18558251 Donald Trump ‘arrest’ eclipses Biden family payments scandal - "Leaks about the impending arrest of a former president have electrified US media, conveniently overshadowing an extraordinary series of payments which emerged last week from a Chinese company to the Biden family. It turns out less than two months after Joe Biden left office as vice-president in 2017, State Energy HK Limited, a Chinese company, sent $US3m to a company associated with John Walker, a Clinton administration official and friend of the Bidens, whose bank records have been obtained under the committee’s subpoena power. Then, over the next three months, $US1.065m was distributed in a series of small individual payments to the personal accounts of Joe Biden’s son Hunter, James Biden (the President’s brother), Hallie Biden (his daughter-in-law), and an unknown “Biden”. “It is unclear what services were provided to obtain this exorbitant amount of money,” committee chairman and Kentucky congressman James Comer, one of the most powerful men in Washington, said last week." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

>>18565050 Lights, cameras, barricades: World awaits action on Donald Trump - Americans are bracing for a hotly anticipated grand jury decision on whether to indict the former president over alleged hush money payments. Four days after Trump issued an incendiary social media post claiming he would be arrested on Tuesday and urging his supporters to take to the streets on his behalf, very little has shifted and Americans continue to wonder what happens next.

>>18613217 Trump’s hope for a political comeback in 2024 just got significantly harder - The 2024 US presidential race has been turned on its head with the indictment of Donald Trump for his role in paying hush money to a porn-star on the eve of the 2016 election.

>>18638001 Video: ‘You’ll all get locked up’: Trump fan blasts Nine reporter during live cross about indictment - Australian news reporter Alison Piotrowski has copped a spray from an aggressive Donald Trump supporter, who interrupted live TV to declare: “You’ll all get locked up.” The woman could be heard repeatedly screaming that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the man bringing charges against Mr Trump, was a “criminal” and declaring the reporting crew was “fake news”. “Bragg is a criminal, Bragg is a criminal, okay?” she says, before Piotrowski pulls her microphone away. “And you guys are fake news.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670446

File: be56f4ab657c907⋯.jpg (70.28 KB,400x400,1:1,OZ_Pepe.jpg)

File: 49c9e47c7fb3569⋯.jpg (232.75 KB,841x514,841:514,Q_479.jpg)

File: ccb3ea3d2932b3c⋯.jpg (300.17 KB,842x828,421:414,Q_908.jpg)

File: a6f1a731b3eccc9⋯.jpg (136.57 KB,842x302,421:151,Q_910.jpg)

PREVIOUSLY COLLECTED NOTABLES

Q Research AUSTRALIA #28 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/f55ec192

Q Research AUSTRALIA #27 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/0b34604e

Q Research AUSTRALIA #26 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/9061e982

Q Research AUSTRALIA #25 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/767a7ba2

Q Research AUSTRALIA #24 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/8aa647c3

Q Research AUSTRALIA #23 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d8746531

Q Research AUSTRALIA #22 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/0c91380d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #21 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d1699b6f

Q Research AUSTRALIA #20 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/dd402760

Q Research AUSTRALIA #19 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/c2a98b43

Q Research AUSTRALIA #18 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/2ea866f7

Q Research AUSTRALIA #17 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/1df91700

Q Research AUSTRALIA #16 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/805b4829

Q Research AUSTRALIA #15 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/f975dc35

Q Research AUSTRALIA #14 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/62cdd4fd

Q Research AUSTRALIA #13 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d2399cda

Q Research AUSTRALIA #12 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/558b72b8

Q Research AUSTRALIA #11 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/c17ab97f

Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/bb780c9d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #9 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/6a61bec5

Q Research AUSTRALIA #8 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/7ee89fce

Q Research AUSTRALIA #7 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/239e467c

Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/c4932ea1

Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/5941506b

Q Research AUSTRALIA #4 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/acf74c16

Q Research AUSTRALIA #3 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/2021ac89

Q Research AUSTRALIA #2 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/b8855384

Q Research AUSTRALIA #1 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/1e0dcd6e

THREAD ARCHIVES

Q Research AUSTRALIA #28 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/HKsEV

Q Research AUSTRALIA #27 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/KZ6Y0

Q Research AUSTRALIA #26 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/dJnda

Q Research AUSTRALIA #25 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/mWRzL

Q Research AUSTRALIA #24 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/uytYA

Q Research AUSTRALIA #23 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/R5AIe

Q Research AUSTRALIA #22 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/vwtO9

Q Research AUSTRALIA #21 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/Si585

Q Research AUSTRALIA #20 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/Q7NNa

Q Research AUSTRALIA #19 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/elcTK

Q Research AUSTRALIA #18 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/oV4MT

Q Research AUSTRALIA #17 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/NtfuF

Q Research AUSTRALIA #16 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/PFwgE

Q Research AUSTRALIA #15 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/5hP7I

Q Research AUSTRALIA #14 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/A85E8

Q Research AUSTRALIA #13 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/rdbq6

Q Research AUSTRALIA #12 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/PahoV

Q Research AUSTRALIA #11 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/VoY1C

Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/lmbJh

Q Research AUSTRALIA #9 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/gOsSc

Q Research AUSTRALIA #8 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/xYtqT

Q Research AUSTRALIA #7 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/YT76p

Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/DGknZ

Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/vlHWs

Q Research AUSTRALIA #4 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/B0Z4l

Q Research AUSTRALIA #3 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/xznbY

Q Research AUSTRALIA #2 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/hlJ0W

Q Research AUSTRALIA #1 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/vJ8oH

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670448

File: fc03f2897a3cf42⋯.jpg (3.11 MB,2800x2000,7:5,Chairman_of_the_Joint_Chie….jpg)

CURRENT DOUGH

https://controlc.com/72c09050

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a6d5ed No.18670449

File: 48cb6b440a43942⋯.jpeg (73.59 KB,450x818,225:409,fags.jpeg)

>>18670265

Cheers naker baker maker. I'd buy ya a beer but i'm living the neet ife.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670474

File: dcc6d3d3d37603f⋯.jpg (124.61 KB,1098x732,3:2,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

File: d1a8b7e0e71c35f⋯.jpg (622.65 KB,1999x1333,1999:1333,A_crew_member_is_seen_on_b….jpg)

Donald Trump winning 2024 US election will not change Aukus plans, Australia’s Albanese says

Bloomberg - 9 Apr, 2023

Australia is confident its agreement with the US to purchase a fleet of nuclear submarines for delivery in the early 2030s will go ahead no matter who wins the 2024 election, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

In an interview broadcast on Sky News on Sunday, Albanese was asked about growing political division in the US following the indictment of former President Donald Trump, who is currently campaigning for another shot at the country’s top job.

The relationship between Australia and the US was between nations, “not just between leaders,” Albanese said, adding he wasn’t concerned about any impact on the Aukus agreement should Trump return to the presidency.

“Australia and the US share common values,” Albanese said. US President Joe Biden is expected to travel to Australia for the first time in May for a meeting of the Quad strategic partnership, alongside Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida.

Under the Aukus security agreement signed in 2021, the US and the UK will assist Australia in obtaining a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, with the first US Virginia-class vessels expected to arrive by the early 2030s.

However the deal has been criticised in Australia for tying it more closely to the US. Former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating described the Aukus agreement as the “worst deal in history” in a speech in March, saying Australia would be tied to the “whim and caprice” of Washington.

China has also voiced opposition to the Aukus deal, with Beijing claiming that the military alliance weakens nuclear non-proliferation efforts, as well as jeopardising peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.

Washington insists the submarines are nuclear-powered, not nuclear-armed.

Canberra has said that it does not intend to use the US technology to develop its own nuclear weapons.

https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/australasia/article/3216453/donald-trump-winning-2024-us-election-will-not-change-aukus-plans-australias-albanese-says

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670521

File: f72307f1d48f4f6⋯.jpg (160.91 KB,1200x675,16:9,The_PM_doesn_t_see_Donald_….jpg)

>>18670474

Anthony Albanese dismisses fears Australia-US ties will suffer if Trump reclaims White House

AAP - Apr 9, 2023

The AUKUS security pact will remain strong regardless of who ends up in the White House after the 2024 US election, the Prime Minister says.

Anthony Albanese said he isn’t concerned for the future of the alliance with the US and the UK, despite the possibility of Donald Trump returning as president following next year’s election.

Mr Trump, who is the current front-runner for the 2024 Republican nomination, pleaded not guilty last week to 34 counts of falsifying business records, following an investigation into hush money payments.

Mr Trump, the first current or former US president to face criminal charges, says the allegations are politically motivated.

Mr Albanese said AUKUS would remain strong regardless of who was leading nations involved in the security pact.

“Our relationship with the United States is a relationship between nations, between peoples, not just between leaders,” he told Sky News on Sunday.

“Australia and the United States share common values, I work very closely with President (Joe) Biden.”

Mr Biden is set to travel to Australia next month for the Quad Leaders’ Summit, where he will also address federal parliament.

“He will be an honoured guest in our country,” Mr Albanese said.

The AUKUS pact will see Australia acquire eight nuclear-powered submarines by the 2050s, with the vessels set to cost up to $368 billion.

https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/world/us-news/trump-news/2023/04/09/albanese-trump-aukus-alliance/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670549

File: 0a7c5cfd16aaf57⋯.jpg (310.26 KB,825x616,75:56,AA_10.jpg)

File: ea646ff99c010d0⋯.mp4 (15.68 MB,640x360,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_blames_Do….mp4)

>>18670474

>>18670521

Anthony Albanese Tweet

Democracy is precious and cannot be taken for granted - the violent insurrection in Washington is an assault on the rule of law and democracy. Donald Trump has encouraged this response and must now call on his supporters to stand down.

https://twitter.com/AlboMP/status/1346929529198055424

Joe Biden Tweet

Let me be very clear: the scenes of chaos at the Capitol do not represent who we are. What we are seeing is a small number of extremists dedicated to lawlessness. This is not dissent, it's disorder. It borders on sedition, and it must end. Now.

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1346928275470299142

Anthony Albanese blames Donald Trump for US Capitol violence

sbs.com.au - 7 January 2021

https://www.sbs.com.au/programs/video/1841137219993/Anthony-Albanese-blames-Donald-Trump-for-US-Capito

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

59163f No.18670644

Q drop 461 what makes great movies

Great actors. So I went to bitchute and did crisis actors in search bar came back with over 3000 hits many are duplicates but it is worldwide. Go FCB Decode fromhttps://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=crisis%20actors%20&kind=video

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670782

File: 2987ed42d74b939⋯.jpg (145.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

NATO calls Albanese to Lithuania summit

BEN PACKHAM - APRIL 9, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has been invited to attend NATO’s upcoming summit in Lithuania amid fears over China’s growing alignment with Russia and the authoritarian powers’ systemic threat to the international order.

The invitation to the Prime Minister and his Japanese, South Korean and New Zealand counterparts comes as the world’s most powerful military alliance – bolstered by the admission of Finland – works to strengthen ties with its Asia-Pacific partners.

Lithuania’s top national security adviser, Kestutis Budrys, revealed the invitation to The Australian just days after talks in Brussels between NATO officials and representatives of the four Asia-Pacific countries, dubbed by the alliance as the AP4.

It’s unclear whether Mr ­Albanese will attend the July 11-12 summit but Australia’s status as a major donor to Ukraine’s war ­effort and a staunch defender of global rules suggest he is likely to make the trip. “We still don’t have the answer yet but yes, that's what we expect,” Mr Budrys said.

The senior adviser to Lithu­anian President Gitanas Nauseda met officials from the Prime Minister’s office and the Departments of Foreign Affairs and Defence during a visit to Australia last week.

The invitation, which is informal until the AP4 leaders confirm their attendance, comes as the US scrambles to investigate a devastating intelligence leak detailing Russian and Ukrainian war plans, and sensitive assessments of Chinese threats in the Indo-­Pacific.

A senior US national security official told The New York Times the leak was “a nightmare for the Five Eyes” – the Anglophone ­intelligence-sharing network that includes Australia.

Tensions were also high in the Pacific at the weekend as China deployed dozens of fighter jets and warships around Taiwan following a meeting between the island’s president and US house Speaker Kevin McCarthy in California.

Mr Albanese and other AP4 leaders attended last year’s NATO summit in Madrid, where the alliance declared for the first time that China’s “ambitions and coercive policies challenge our interests, security and values”.

NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said after meeting AP4 officials last week that any decision by China to provide ­lethal aid for Russia in its war against Ukraine would be “a ­historic mistake with profound implications”.

Mr Stoltenberg said as Beijing and Moscow pushed back against the rules-based international order, it was vital for NATO allies and its ­like-minded partners to stand together.

Like Australia, Lithuania has been subjected by Beijing to a campaign of economic coercion that saw its exports blocked and pressure piled on countries to strip Lithuanian inputs from their supply chains. The Baltic state of just 2.7 million people sparked Chinese fury in 2021 when it allowed Taiwan to open a de facto embassy in Vilnius named the “Taiwanese Representative Office”.

Lithuania is also leading a push to admit Ukraine to NATO, with its parliament unanimously passing a resolution last week to ­officially invite Kyiv to join the ­alliance at the upcoming summit in Vilnius.

The proposal is considered a radical one by many NATO allies, which fear the move would dangerously escalate the conflict.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670784

File: 3ea1b083164231a⋯.jpg (115.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Albanese_would_join_oth….jpg)

>>18670782

2/2

Mr Budrys said Europe had learned its lesson after becoming overly reliant on Russian energy, and it was important for like-minded nations to avoid a similar dependence on China.

He said the “possible harmful consequences” of dependency on China and Russia required new levels of solidarity between ­nations that respected global rules. “In relation to China, economic dependency can be turned into a tool of coercion, but also a political tool if there is a crisis or military conflict,” Mr Budrys said.

“For that reason, we have to think about risk mitigation measures and be very realistic about what level of interdependence can be harmful.”

He called for “economic war-gaming” by like-minded nations to assess the risks of coercion and supply chain interruptions, “and to see what would limit that”.

The director of foreign policy and defence at the United States Studies Centre, Peter Dean, said the NATO invitation was an important one, reflecting the interconnectedness of Europe and the Indo-Pacific in an era of intense strategic competition.

“It’s an acknowledgment of the need to stand together in the face of revisionist powers in both regions, and endeavours to strengthen the international order that favours rules and dip­lomacy over coercion and force,” he told The Australian. “We are seeing the need to engage not just on diplomacy and the international order but on defence ­industrial collaboration and broad­er economic engagement.”

Accepting the NATO invitation will add to Mr Albanese’s already hectic travel schedule amid a cost-of-living crisis at home and the government’s high-stakes advocacy for a Yes vote in the voice referendum.

He will attend King Charles’s coronation in London days before the May budget, and the G7-plus summit in Hiroshima that month as a guest of Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida.

In another major commitment, Mr Albanese will host US President Joe Biden, Mr Kishida and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Sydney for the Quad Leaders’ summit, which is also likely to be held in May.

He is also set to address the Shangri-La Dialogue security conference in Singapore in early June, and attend the Pacific Island Forum in the Cook Islands in the middle of the year.

In a visit to Moscow in March, presidents Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin called each other “dear friend” and revelled in their challenge to international norms. As he departed the Kremlin, Mr Xi told his counterpart: “Right now there are changes the likes of which we have not seen for 100 years. And we are the ones driving these changes together.”

French President Emmanuel Macron urged Mr Xi last week during a visit to Beijing to “bring Russia to its senses” over its war in Ukraine. Mr Macron was ­accompanied by a delegation of 50 business leaders, despite EU calls to “de-risk” Europe’s ties with China.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nato-calls-pm-to-summit/news-story/8c52f790ab68252cf03ad87a29938b27

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670801

File: 67d5e064af0ba44⋯.mp4 (11.96 MB,1024x576,16:9,China_slams_World_Health_O….mp4)

China health officials lash out at WHO, defend search for source of COVID-19 virus

AP / abc.net.au - 9 April 2023

Chinese health officials have defended their search for the source of the COVID-19 virus and lashed out at the World Health Organization after its leader said Beijing should have shared genetic information earlier.

The director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention's, Shen Hongbing, said the WHO comments were "offensive and disrespectful."

He accused the WHO of "attempting to smear China" and said it should avoid helping others "politicise COVID-19".

The global health body's director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said in March that newly disclosed genetic material gathered in Wuhan in central China, where the first cases were detected in late 2019, "should have been shared three years ago".

"As a responsible country and as scientists, we have always actively shared research results with scientists from around the world," Mr Shen said.

The origins of COVID-19 are still debated and the focus of political dispute.

Many scientists believe it jumped from animals to humans at a market in Wuhan, but the city is also home to laboratories including China's top facility for collecting viruses.

That prompted suggestions COVID-19 might have leaked from one.

The ruling Communist Party has tried to deflect criticism of its handling of the outbreak by spreading uncertainty about its origins.

Officials have repeated anti-US conspiracy theories that the virus was created by Washington and smuggled into China.

The government also says the virus might have entered China on mail or food shipments, though scientists abroad see no evidence to support that.

Chinese officials suppressed information about the Wuhan outbreak in 2019 and punished a doctor who warned others about the new disease.

The ruling party reversed course in early 2020 and shut down access to major cities and most international travel to contain the disease.

The genetic material cited by the WHO's Dr Tedros was uploaded recently to a global database but collected in 2020 at a Wuhan market where wildlife was sold.

The samples show DNA from raccoon dogs mingled with the virus, scientists say. They say that adds evidence to the hypothesis COVID-19 came from animals, not a lab, but doesn't resolve the question of where it started. They say the virus also might have spread to raccoon dogs from humans.

The information was removed by Chinese officials from the database after foreign scientists asked the CDC about it, but it had been copied by a French expert and shared with researchers outside China.

A CDC researcher, Zhou Lei, who worked in Wuhan, said Chinese scientists "shared all the data we had" and "adhered to principles of openness, objectivity and transparency".

Mr Shen said scientists investigated the possibility of a laboratory leak and "fully shared our research and data without any concealment or reservation."

He said the source of COVID-19 was yet to be found, but he noted it took years to identify the AIDS virus and its origin is still unclear.

"Some forces and figures who instigate and participate in politicising the traceability issue and attempting to smear China should not assume that the vision of the scientific community around the world will be blinded by their clumsy manipulation," Mr Shen said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-09/china-lashes-out-at-who-defend-covid-virus-search/102202900

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18670815

File: defb836357a045b⋯.jpg (118.51 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Lisa_Harris_has_launched_l….jpg)

File: e2796c7a5259b7d⋯.jpg (2.01 MB,6000x4000,3:2,An_agreement_between_the_U….jpg)

US government facing compensation claim over Navy officer’s $150 sex with Melbourne teen

Cameron Houston - April 10, 2023

A former Melbourne sex worker has launched legal action against the US government over allegations a senior officer in the US Navy had sex with her in the 1990s - when she was just 15 and addicted to heroin.

Lisa Harris, 39, will pursue compensation under an agreement between the US and Australia, which provides recourse for local victims of alleged misconduct by American military personnel.

Harris, who now lives in Darwin, said she met the lieutenant commander, who cannot be named for legal reasons, in St Kilda in 1996 or 1997, before having sex at a CBD hotel and receiving about $150.

“He was wearing a dark green uniform. It identified to me straight away that he was in the military, and he was American. He handed me a business card at the end of our time together,” Harris told The Age.

She insists that officer was aware of her age when he solicited her on Fitzroy Street.

“He absolutely knew how old I was. Because he was in a uniform, I told him. I said: ‘you know I’m only 15, right?’ And he said it didn’t bother him,” Harris said.

Correspondence obtained by The Age reveals Victoria Police and the US Naval Criminal Investigative Service investigated the incident in 1999, but the probe was stymied by Harris’ refusal to implicate the American officer.

The lieutenant commander has never denied the encounter. However, his lawyers told the US District Court of Columbia in 2006 that he thought Harris was 19.

“Plaintiff provided a statement that detailed how he met her during a trip to Australia, that she told him she was 19 years old, that they engaged in a consensual sexual encounter, and thus… Plaintiff did not engage in a sexual relationship with a known, teenage prostitute,” according to US court documents.

The officer made the statement as part of a legal bid to overturn a decision by the US Navy in 1999 that ended his 17-year career.

The appeal was successful, with the District Court of Columbia ruling in 2008 that his records would be changed to show that he was not discharged, but continued to serve until eligible for retirement.

Harris found the judgement during an online search, and said she was disgusted by the court’s decision.

“The thing that really annoys me is finding out that his government allowed his testimony to go through court without any challenge. This guy has lied and lied and claimed he didn’t know how old I was. And now he gets his record changed,” Harris said.

Lawyer Cameron Doig from Arnold Thomas & Becker accused the officer of preying on a vulnerable young woman.

“By demanding that the United States government compensate her for the devastating impact on her life, Ms Harris has shown exceptional bravery,” he said.

“Our client is one of many women in countries including Australia, Japan and Korea who have been subjected to sexual violence by visiting US military personnel.”

On February 6, Doig sent correspondence to Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, KC, alleging that: “a US Navy officer, committed the tort of battery by sexually abusing our client.”

“In or around 1996 or 1997 [He] solicited our client for sex in St Kilda before sexually abusing her in a Melbourne hotel room. [He] exploited our client’s youth, homelessness and heroin addiction in order to sexually abuse her,” according to the letter sent to Dreyfus in February.

Under the agreement with the US, the Australian government is required to assess the claim for compensation and prepare a report on the case.

The report would then be delivered to the US government, which would decide whether an ex gratia payment was warranted.

Harris’ lawyers have asked for Dreyfus to consider the claim pursuant to the “Agreement Concerning the Status of United States Forces in Australia.”

Under a similar agreement with South Korea, the US government made ex gratia payments of almost $US300,000 in 2002 to the families of two teenaged girls killed by a US army vehicle.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/us-government-facing-compensation-claim-over-navy-officer-s-150-sex-with-melbourne-teen-20230404-p5cy4i.html

https://www.info.dfat.gov.au/Info/Treaties/Treaties.nsf/AllDocIDs/005D3E39D4BF9757CA256B59000DD46F

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0a15bf No.18675306

File: 46336e28d8129ff⋯.mp4 (7.07 MB,640x360,16:9,Pauline_Hanson_Exposing_th….mp4)

VOICE IN AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION WILL DIVIDE AUSTRALIA.

WELL DONE CHINA

Populist Queensland Australian Senator, Pauline Hansen, gifted a document ‘left behind’ at a Canberra coffee shop by workers for the Voice referendum, details intentions to legislate incredible advantages to Aborigines.

INTENSIONALLY DIVISIVE.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676743

File: ae7856ac62f5fac⋯.jpg (82.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser_the_oppositi….jpg)

Julian Leeser quits over Liberals’ stance on Indigenous voice to parliament

ROSIE LEWIS and RHIANNON DOWN - APRIL 11, 2023

1/2

Julian Leeser has resigned from shadow cabinet and has vowed to campaign Yes ahead of the Indigenous voice referendum, after the Liberal Party opposed a national voice enshrined in the Constitution.

In a press conference to announce his resignation, Mr Leeser said he had resigned on a “point of principle” and that he wanted to tell his children he stood up for something he “believed in”.

“No-one else in our party room has this experience,” he said. “I think I’m in a unique situation.

“I’m resigning without rancour but on a point of principle and I think what I want to be able to say to my children in the future is that your father stood up for something he believes in and that’s really important and something all of us should do”.

Mr Leeser, who has been involved in working on the voice for a decade, said it was a topic that people have “reasonable disagreements”, when asked why he had not been able to bring the Liberal Party round to his side.

“I respect the experiences they bring to the parliament, the communities they represent and the like and they have a different history on these issues to the history I have,” he said.

“I have ultimately come to the position I have because I’ve been here from day one as a supporter of the idea of this.”

Mr Leeser called for both sides in the voice debate to listen to each other and refrain from calling the other side “racist” or accuse them of wanting “special privileges”.

“If you’re a leader or advocate for the “no” case, then you have a responsibility to listen to the aspirations of Indigenous Australians who see value in a Voice,” he said.

“No matter where we are in this debate, we all must find a way to walk a mile in another’s shoes.

“There’s always been a place in this country, in our heart and soul, for civil debate, for discussion that helps us find common ground and in this debate, that means not calling those who disagree with you racist or inferring they come to the table in bad faith.

“And it means not inferring that those who disagree with you want special privileges.”

However he criticised the Albanese government’s handling of the voice referendum, while expressing his support for Opposition Leader Peter Dutton.

“In Peter Dutton we have the most experienced and tested Opposition Leader in our history,” he said.

“Peter Dutton is a man who kept our country safe for nine years and I look forward to working for his election.”

Mr Leeser also criticised the way Anthony Albanese had run the process to enshrine the voice, saying that it lacked “bipartisanship”.

“I don’t believe the government has handled this process particularly well and I’ve been very critical of the Prime Minister and of the government,” he said.

“We had a proper bipartisan process up until the 2022 election.

“Some of the previous reports even were given both to the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition.

“We worked through things together, but that changed in 2022.

“And you had a situation over the summer where the Prime Minister had said look at the Calma-Langton report but couldn’t deal with the detail himself of some of the issues raised there.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676746

File: 280476a473c4ca4⋯.jpg (169.29 KB,1404x756,13:7,Liberal_MP_quits_shadow_ca….jpg)

>>18676743

2/2

Earlier, in a statement posted on Facebook, Mr Leeser said he remained a proud Liberal committed to his party, his constituents in the Sydney electorate of Berowra and the leadership of Peter Dutton but, on the voice, he disagreed with his party’s position.

“Unlike almost any other party in the parliament, the Liberal Party gives backbenchers the freedom to champion the ideas they believe in. Because I intend to campaign for a Yes vote I have resigned from the shadow ministry,” Mr Leeser said.

“I want to assure you that I remain a proud Liberal committed to my party, the people of Berowra, and the leadership of Peter Dutton. My resignation as a frontbencher is not about personality, it’s about keeping faith with an issue that I have been working on for almost a decade.

“I’ve also tried to keep faith with my Liberal values. My desire to conserve our institutions like the Australian Constitution with my desire to seek better outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.”

Mr Leeser has been the opposition’s Indigenous Australians and legal affairs spokesman and has worked on various models for an Indigenous voice to parliament and the executive government for nearly a decade.

A week ago, Mr Leeser presented a blueprint for the voice that would let parliament legislate who in the executive government the advisory body could talk to and what it could talk about.

In his proposal, a voice would still be enshrined in the Constitution but parliament would be given ultimate power to decide how it works.

Two days later, the Opposition Leader and the Liberal Party announced it would oppose a national voice in the Constitution and instead advocate for legislated regional and local advisory bodies. The Liberal Party supports constitutional recognition.

“I will in the weeks ahead be arguing for the changes to the referendum wording that I detailed in my National Press Club address last Monday,” Mr Leeser said.

“The Press Club model for the voice – is constitutionally sound, gives Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians a place in our founding document, and recognises the supremacy of Parliament in our constitutional system. It improves the model put forward by the government and its referendum working group. This will also improve its chances for success at the ballot box.

“I acknowledge the support and good grace of Peter Dutton throughout the process and the faith he has shown in me. As shadow minister I have travelled with Peter and seen him listen to and engage with Indigenous leaders and Indigenous people in the community. I know he has a genuine desire to improve the lives of Indigenous Australians.

“However, on the voice Referendum we find ourselves in different places. People of goodwill can disagree.”

The country’s first Indigenous cabinet minister and former West Australian MP Ken Wyatt last week quit the party over its stance.

Mr Leeser said he had “many respectful discussions” with his colleagues about the voice, but ultimately had not been able to persuade them.

Liberal shadow cabinet members will be bound by the party’s voice position, which is why Mr Leeser has resigned and moved to the back bench.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/julian-leeser-to-quit-over-liberals-voice-position/news-story/634b34e7bf1110ea0c8e1c78f231779a

https://www.facebook.com/JulianLeeserMP/posts/660291732571094

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676748

File: d1117c9645e5d68⋯.jpg (104.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser_has_explaine….jpg)

>>18676743

We must find common ground on the voice

JULIAN LEESER - APRIL 11, 2023

Almost ten years ago, I sat down with a small group of constitutional conservatives and Indigenous leaders and worked on a proposal for constitutional recognition.

The idea we developed was different, it was organic, and it was an uniquely Australian idea designed for Australian conditions.

The proposal was called the voice. Though, to be entirely frank it was voice 1.0.

It was a way of achieving constitutional recognition as well as creating a new structure to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

As a non-Indigenous Australian, I have been on a journey seeking to understand the perspective of Indigenous Australians on the issue of constitutional recognition.

Before I entered parliament, I started an organisation called Uphold and Recognise, which sought to engage constitutional conservatives on the issue.

In parliament, along with Pat Dodson I co-chaired the parliamentary Joint Committee inquiry into Constitutional Recognition. Pat and I sweated every word. We laughed, we argued, we tried to push each other towards our own positions, but we sought to find common ground. That report is the thing I am most proud of in my time as a parliamentarian.

As the debate over the voice has taken hold over recent months, I have sought to keep faith with the very chords of belief and belonging that are part of who I am.

I have tried to keep faith with the first peoples of this land who want to have a stake in their own futures as well as keep faith with the Constitution, that invisible pillar that holds our nation together. But above all, it’s been about keeping faith with my values – Liberal values based on a fair-minded, conservative temperament.

Over recent months, I have spoken with Peter Dutton on a number of occasions about my desire to champion changes to the amendment. I respect Peter greatly.

I have also had many respectful discussions with colleagues about the voice. I have listened to their views and they have heard mine but ultimately I have not been able to persuade them, and it’s clear the Shadow Cabinet and the Party Room and I have landed in different places on this issue.

One of the great strengths of the Liberal Party is that, unlike almost any other party in the parliament, we give backbenchers the freedom to champion the ideas they believe in. I go to the backbench without bitterness or rancour, because I want to exercise that freedom because I intend to campaign for a yes vote.

I believe the time for the voice has come. I believe that better policy is made when the very people affected by it are consulted.

It is through empowering people and by building institutions that shift responsibility and decision making closer to people, we are more likely to shift the dial on Indigenous health, education, housing, safety and economic opportunity.

The time has come for the government to seriously engage with Coalition voters. It hasn’t done so to date. The government’s failures in this regard could ultimately put the referendum at risk.

When it comes to the voice, I know there are many Australians who remain to be convinced by the Yes case. They have legitimate questions and concerns.

I understand those concerns because I too have wrestled with them.

Last Monday, I put forward a new amended model for a voice at the National Press Club. The Press Club model achieves three things

First, it affirms the importance of local and regional bodies across our country as was proposed by the Calma-Langton report and supported by the Coalition.

Second, it achieves constitutional recognition without using symbolic language which is out of keeping with the rest of the Constitution – removing questions and doubts about activist judges.

Third, it leaves the scope and powers of the voice completely to parliament rather than turbocharging objections to disputed words in the Constitution. In other words, removing clause two of the proposed constitutional amendment.

In the months ahead, I will champion these changes.

I believe these changes will move the referendum to surer ground because we have taken off the barnacles. These changes will recognise Indigenous Australians in our founding document, while guaranteeing the supremacy of parliament.

The truth is the referendum is not tracking well, and if the government is serious about succeeding it must be prepared to compromise to bring more Australians into the tent.

We must all understand the risk to our country, and the risk to our shared national reconciliation project, if the referendum fails.

An all or nothing approach could deliver nothing.

That’s why we must find common ground.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/about-keeping-faith-why-im-resigning-the-liberal-front-bench/news-story/f8de467671b92a8c7fd7bf9bacb54c6b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676756

File: 00c8580146de5c7⋯.jpg (72.7 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: fe9273f2586d0bb⋯.jpg (97.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser.jpg)

>>18676743

The risk for Peter Dutton: will Julian Leeser’s departure have a domino effect?

SIMON BENSON - APRIL 11, 2023

Julian Leeser’s resignation from the Coalition frontbench has dealt a damaging blow to Peter Dutton and his ability to maintain a unified party position in opposing the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government.

The risk for Dutton is whether Leeser’s protest triggers a falling of the dominoes.

In the wake of former Coalition cabinet minister Ken Wyatt’s decision to resign from the Liberal Party last week, the optics have just become very messy for the Opposition leader.

Leeser was, until this morning, the Opposition’s shadow indigenous affairs minister and shadow attorney general.

His own proposal – backing constitutional change but legislating the voice’s remit – was comprehensively rejected by Dutton and the Liberal party room.

On this basis, his decision to resign from the frontbench wasn’t entirely unexpected and was warranted.

As a constitutional lawyer having worked on a voice to parliament for more than a decade, Leeser says he wants to campaign for the Yes case, consistent with his values.

This rules him out of serving in the shadow ministry which is now locked into Dutton’s opposition to a national voice in any form.

As a backbencher he is now free to do as he pleases. Unlike the Labor Party.

Leeser stresses that his decision is not about Dutton.

“I want to assure you that I remain a proud Liberal committed to my party, the people of Berowra, and the leadership of Peter Dutton,” he says.

“…it’s about keeping faith with an issue that I have been working on for almost a decade.”

This will come as little comfort to the Liberal leader who now has a serious task ahead to keep the party room fracturing further over this issue.

Leeser has the comfort of marking his protest by resigning from the frontbench rather than resigning from the party.

Representing a very safe Liberal seat in the leafy outer suburbs of Sydney’s north shore, he is under no threat of losing it.

But, as he alluded to, he is clearly concerned about the mood of his electorate which delivered an eight per cent swing against him at the last election.

The risk for Dutton is that Leeser’s stance on a matter of principle may encourage others in the party room to examine their own positions.

Losing someone from the frontbench of Leeser’s standing is damaging enough. But losing a backbencher whose only recourse would be to resign the party would be a devastating blow.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-risk-for-dutton-will-leesers-departure-have-a-domino-effect/news-story/b1596bc49a2c149e9cec959c5d9b9e2f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676766

File: 52447cc20f14a0b⋯.mp4 (12.08 MB,640x360,16:9,Australia_suspends_WTO_dis….mp4)

Federal government says agreement reached with China to resolve barley dispute

Stephen Dziedzic - 11 April 2023

1/2

The federal government has agreed to suspend its appeal to the World Trade Organization over Chinese government tariffs on Australian barley just before the international body was due to hand down a finding over the dispute.

In May 2020, China imposed tariffs of 80 per cent on Australian barley for five years, crippling a trade worth up to $1.5 billion a year.

The former Coalition government appealed that decision to the WTO, rejecting China's claims that Australia had used subsidies to distort the market.

Industry sources said the WTO was due to hand down a finding on the tariffs within days, with most observers predicting the panel would firmly back Australia in the dispute.

However, on Tuesday afternoon, the Foreign Minister Penny Wong announced that China had promised to conduct an "expedited review" of the tariffs over the next three months and that, in return, Australia would "temporarily suspend" its WTO action over the same period.

"The government is seeking to expedite the resolution of this matter. Obviously, we retain our rights in the WTO if we're not able to get agreement," she told journalists in Adelaide.

She said that bilateral negotiations might help Australian barley producers get back into the Chinese market much faster.

"This would potentially deliver a result in a shorter timeframe than if we simply proceeded through the WTO," she said.

She also said if the agreement provided a successful pathway to lift barley tariffs, then Australia hoped to follow a "similar process" to reverse tariffs on Australian wine.

"Obviously, stabilisation and the resolution of trade issues will take time, but we are pleased that constructive dialogue has resumed," Senator Wong said, adding that Australia would continue to work within the WTO "to protect and preserve the rights of Australian exporters.

Negotiation is Australia's 'preferred method', trade minister says

Trade Minister Don Farrell said Australia's "preferred method" of resolving trade disputes was "to discuss and negotiate with our trading partners".

"And, on this occasion, we have sought dialogue with our Chinese counterparts to see if there's any possibility of resolving these impediments through sensible dialogue," he said.

One Australian government source stressed that the suspension was temporary and that Australia could resume its WTO action after the review.

They said they were "confident" that China would reverse the tariffs during the three-month review, but would not say if Beijing had given any concrete commitments.

The announcement “warrants cautious optimism", said Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Birmingham and Shadow Trade Minister Kevin Hogan in a joint statement.

They stressed that Australia should “expect nothing less” than “full removal of the tariffs that China imposed on Australian barley”.

“As with recent engagements between Australia and China, the ultimate value of this process will be judged on the outcomes achieved,” they said.

“In this instance, that outcome should be the complete and unconditional removal of tariffs on Australian barley and wine tariffs, which should never have been imposed in the first place.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676769

File: 42d603a8bff7e9d⋯.jpg (2.22 MB,5000x2813,5000:2813,In_May_2020_China_imposed_….jpg)

>>18676766

2/2

Grain producers welcome move

The Director of the Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI) Professor James Laurenceson said the Albanese government was "bending over backwards to provide Beijing with a face-saving off-ramp in the barley dispute case at the WTO".

"Whether Beijing comes to the party is up to it. But there can be no suggestion of anything other than Canberra being driven by diplomacy," he said.

Grain Producers Australia Chair, Barry Large, backed the government's strategy and said the organisation "looked forward to a positive outcome" from China's review of the tariff.

"Barley is an important rotation crop for Australian growers and any optimism on the future outlook is good," he said.

"This process to reach a resolution would be significantly shorter than if the WTO process continued."

The issue arose after the Chinese claimed Australia had been dumping barley below the cost of production, which the industry has always strongly denied.

It led to a shutdown of trade, which had a huge impact on grain farmers, with 2021 estimates that Australian grain growers lost $30 to $40 a tonne for feed barley when China imposed the tariffs.

Victorian grain grower and Grains Producer Australia spokesman Andrew Weidemann welcomed the decision, saying his organisation always opposed the WTO action.

Mr Weidemann said his group had been lobbying for a negotiated outcome with the Chinese, which "looks likely to be on the table".

He said it was "the first positive step" in four years, since the tariff was suddenly imposed on Australian barley, which effectively ended the trade between the two countries.

“The Chinese culture means that we have to save face somehow, and this is the first positive step towards it,” Mr Weidemann said.

Despite his optimism, Mr Weidemann was also cautious about the deal, which includes Chinese authorities reviewing the tariffs over the next three months, and Australia reserving the right to resume its WTO action if they're not lifted.

“It's still no guarantee that this will get across the line [and] the duties will be removed,” he said.

“Our contacts in China have been voicing their hope we would eventually [be] able to trade barley with them again.

“To have China back in the barley market, along with all the other new markets we've developed, it only bodes well for the barley industry in Australia.”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-11/agreement-reached-with-china-for-resolution-of-barley-dispute/102208192

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676772

File: f13722e37ca656f⋯.jpg (125.8 KB,1200x720,5:3,Chinese_Vice_FM_to_visit_A….jpg)

Chinese Vice FM to visit Australia, Fiji amid signs of warming ties

Zhang Changyue - Apr 10, 2023

Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu will visit Australia and Fiji this week at their invitation, the Chinese foreign ministry confirmed at a regular press briefing on Monday, saying Ma will hold the new round of political consultation between the officials of the foreign ministries of China and Australia.

Experts said Ma's visit to Australia, following talks between the two countries' foreign, defense and commerce ministries, showed that China and Australia are resuming communication channels in different areas and levels.

Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday that Ma will negotiate some specific issues with the Australian side in response to the consensus reached by the two countries' leaders last year on the sidelines of the G20 meeting in Bali, including paving the way and preparing for the future mutual visit of higher-level officials from China and Australia.

China has issued an invitation "in principle" for Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to visit Beijing, and the trip could take place around September and October to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the first visit to China by an Australian prime minister, South China Morning Post reported on Tuesday. According to Reuters, Albanese said on Wednesday he would accept the invitation to visit China once he receives it.

At the same time, however, Albanese told media on Sunday that its AUKUS agreement with the US to purchase a fleet of nuclear submarines for delivery in early 2030 would go ahead and will not be affected by who wins the US 2024 election.

Australia's attitude is very clear: it will improve ties with Beijing while keeping its cooperation going with Washington, in the hope that such cooperation will not affect China-Australia relations, especially in the economic and trade sectors, Zhou Fangyin, a professor at the Guangdong Research Institute for International Strategies, told the Global Times on Monday.

"As an independent country, Australia has the right and freedom to form an alliance. But China will never allow such an alliance to treat it as an ultimate enemy, or to harm China's interests. Albanese should have the wisdom to find the 'balance' between taking care of his Western alliances and stabilizing ties with Beijing," said Chen.

On Ma's trip to Fiji, Chen explained that Fiji's new government, influenced by the West, has made some policy shifts to cater to the West's narrative at the cost of its ties with China, including the suspension of China-Fiji police cooperation and changing the name of Taipei Trade Office in Fiji.

In late March, Fiji has renamed Taiwan region's representative office as the "Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan)", changing it from the previous name of Taipei Trade Office, which was set by the then ruling Fiji administration in 2018. Chinese foreign ministry said it opposed any attempt to create "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan".

As the US continued to exert its influence in the South Pacific region, Chen said Ma's visit to Fiji showed that China will always develop relations with countries in the South Pacific region with an attitude of frankness, equality and assistance for mutual benefit and that the countries concerned should not be provoked or deluded by certain countries.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202304/1288828.shtml

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/202304/t20230410_11057056.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676779

File: 7e230a72b6c1fcf⋯.jpg (296.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,HMAS_Ballarat_left_and_USS….jpg)

File: 07ed2ea32403b47⋯.jpg (150.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,Traditional_Chinese_board_….jpg)

File: 371d1b813c0ea59⋯.jpg (114.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,ANU_s_Professor_John_Blaxl….jpg)

File: 1e62a786db8bf18⋯.jpg (179.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Personnel_from_3rd_Battali….jpg)

China’s military strategy in the Pacific and how Australia can avoid being beaten

Charles Miranda - April 11, 2023

China is playing a 2500-year-old strategy board game to win over the region and Australia needs more than just submarines and missiles to play, one of our top security analysts has warned.

Australian National University professor of international security and intelligence and defence studies Professor John Blaxland said Australia’s secret weapon was in greater regional engagement as much as new military hardware.

His comments come on the eve of the public release of the Defence Strategic Review, labelled by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as the most important document for 35 years to spell out threats and what we need to combat them.

It also comes ahead of moves by the ADF to boost the use of Pacific nations as a “force multiplier” to its own ranks, training regional militaries with the same weapons, tactics and discipline.

Prof Blaxland said new acquisitions including nuclear-powered submarines, drones and missiles were important but more needed to be done on engagement with regional allies.

He described the situation like the ancient 2500-year-old Chinese board game Go, the oldest board game in the world, with how China was playing us.

“The idea is you don’t wipe pieces off the board, you win them over and so when you think about unrestricted competition that we face for influence, for favours for positioning and potentially for conflict, but hopefully not. It means we can’t just be thinking about military power, we have got to be thinking about other dimensions of national power.

“We are in a very serious competition for influence … we have to think more broadly.”

He said at all government, foreign affairs and trade and military levels, Australia needed to think about engaging more with Indonesia, Timor, Papua New Guinea, the Pacific and the ASEAN countries. This would be through economic partnerships and greater investment in the New Colombo Plan of scholarships and learning.

“These regional relationships are fundamentally important to our security and to our prosperity and stability and these relationships are under cooked,” he said. “There is still remarkable residual goodwill but you can’t take it for granted, you can’t think technology is the key to everything.”

He added hardware was important because the Chinese were building their arsenal considerably but it could not be the only dimension to the competition.

Meanwhile this July Australia will host one of the biggest military exercises it has ever run from multiple bases in which Pacific nations will drill alongside the ADF.

The biennial Talisman Sabre exercise will involve almost 20,000 personnel largely from the ADF and US forces but also India, the Papua New Guinea Defence Force, the Republic of Fiji Military Forces and His Majesty’s Armed Forces of Tonga.

Defence has announced critical to Talisman Sabre 2023 was to further enhance the interoperability of the ADF with allies specifically from the Pacific, in combined task force operations. In the event of conflict, regional allies could act as force multipliers to core ADF operations with the same weapons use, tactics and thinking.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/national/chinas-miitary-strategy-in-the-pacific-and-how-australia-can-avoid-being-beaten/news-story/b15a0e75281d99a741723a5c277b7966

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676786

File: 60618c1d1cea052⋯.jpg (660.67 KB,3000x1930,300:193,Harvey_Norman_customers_wh….jpg)

Latitude refuses to pay hackers’ ransom demand

Colin Kruger - April 11, 2023

Consumer lender Latitude Financial Group has refused to pay a ransom demand from hackers who stole the details of 14 million consumers last month, but would not say if the criminals have threatened to release the data, which includes driver’s licence details.

Latitude new chief executive Bob Belan yesterday declined to specify how much was demanded.

“Latitude will not pay a ransom to criminals,” he said.

“Based on the evidence and advice, there is simply no guarantee that doing so would result in any customer data being destroyed, and it would only encourage further extortion attempts on Australian and New Zealand businesses in the future.

“Our priority remains on contacting every customer whose personal information was compromised and to support them through this process.”

Belan took over as CEO this month from Ahmed Fahour, who took the company public less than two years ago at $2.60 a share. The stock was closed the trading day flat at $1.26 a share.

The stolen information includes the driver’s licence numbers of 7.9 million Australian and New Zealand customers and covers most current and former Latitude customers.

Latitude provides consumer finance services to Harvey Norman, JB Hi-Fi, The Good Guys and Apple, and recently signed up David Jones. The victims include current and former Latitude customers stretching back more than 10 years as well as applicants for its consumer credit services that include Harvey Norman’s interest-free loans.

Latitude’s latest announcement came the same day that Cybersecurity Minister Clare O’Neil said the government has begun a series of cybersecurity exercises with the banking and finance sector because of its importance to the functioning of the economy.

“The groups that are conducting cyberattacks are becoming more professionalised, industrialised, powerful and effective,” she said.

“We’re conducting exercises where we play through what it would look like to have a major bank, for example, come down in a cyberattack.”

Latitude said it has not detected any hacker activity on its systems since March 16. It is still in the process of restoring some of its operating systems following the attack but said its primary customer contact centre was back online and operating at full capacity. The company can also sign up new customers again.

The group is working with the Australian Cyber Security Centre and the incident is being investigated by the Australian Federal Police.

Elliot Dellys, founder and chief executive of Phronesis Security, said the rejection of ransom payments, and government support, were welcome developments.

“Historically, the trend has been for businesses to try and make the problem go away as quickly as possible, regardless of the long-term consequences,” he said.

He cited research by McGrathNicol last year which found that around 80 per cent of Australian businesses hit by a cyber-attack pay the ransom, with an average payment of just over $1 million.

The Latitude hack follows a number of recent major incidents. Optus was the victim of a major cyber breach in September, with hackers obtaining the data of 10 million of its customers.

But Latitude’s attack is starting to resemble Medibank’s incident in October, which was more serious.

In Medibank’s case, criminals were accessing basic account details of 9.7 million current and former customers, as well as health claims data for about 160,000 Medibank customers, 300,000 customers of its budget arm ahm and 20,000 international customers.

The hackers leaked all stolen data onto the dark web after Medibank refused to pay a $15 million ransom.

https://www.theage.com.au/business/companies/latitude-refuses-to-pay-hackers-ransom-demand-20230411-p5czhi.html?btis=

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676802

File: 464a741163c395a⋯.jpg (4.3 MB,5396x3597,5396:3597,Simeon_Boikov_known_as_The….jpg)

File: 73b59f949406dec⋯.jpg (595.02 KB,2547x1565,2547:1565,Boikov_and_Russian_general….jpg)

File: c0bfc018d8067b8⋯.jpg (9.59 MB,7778x4911,7778:4911,Boikov_s_apartment_in_the_….jpg)

Hiding in the Russian consulate for months, ‘Aussie Cossack’ demands a prisoner swap

Perry Duffin - April 11, 2023

1/2

Vladimir Putin’s man in Australia gunned his 4WD through the tunnels under Sydney, determined to reach the Russian consulate in Woollahra where he could remain out of prison and continue broadcasting pro-Moscow propaganda.

“The Aussie Cossack”, Simeon Boikov, was on parole for breaching a suppression order when he was told by police he was wanted after the alleged assault of a pro-Ukrainian protester. Rather than face arrest on the eve of a planned trip to Moscow in December, he drove straight to the Russian consulate.

Now Boikov has had his main channel silenced and has urged the fearsome Wagner Group to capture Australians fighting for Ukraine so he can be traded in a prisoner swap.

“The Russians don’t plan to surrender me, to give me up, this is not the Ecuadorians,” Boikov told the Herald from the consulate, referring to the years-long extradition fight of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

“I’m not living out of a suitcase.”

The 33-year-old Australian has been holed up since December in a modest apartment in the blonde-bricked Russian consulate overlooking the finessed lawns of wealthy Woollahra.

The anti-vaccination Boikov leant out of the window to update the Herald last week after YouTube permanently terminated his channel. He claims it was because he shared comments by South Australian senator Alex Antic about COVID-19 vaccines and excess deaths.

“Well there’s good news,” Boikov said.

“I was in shackles. I couldn’t say vaccine, Pfizer, Moderna whatever, I had to go soft on Russia-Ukraine.”

Boikov said being banned from YouTube was not a disaster, but three months ago he fled his comfortable life in Breakfast Point hoping to keep his broadcast alive.

“I was driving on the Anzac Bridge, I rang Day Street [police], they connected me to the inspector he said ‘come in, hand yourself in, you’re going back inside, parole wants ya’,” Boikov said.

“I said ‘yeah nah’. I gunned it to the consulate hoping I wouldn’t get picked up.”

Boikov had been given 10 months in prison for breaching a suppression order and naming an alleged paedophile at an anti-lockdown rally in May 2022. He was paroled and booked a ticket to Russia.

Then he spotted a pro-Ukraine protest at Town Hall and decided to start filming.

An older man confronted Australia’s most vocal pro-Putinist, and Boikov pushed him away. The older man was injured tumbling down the steps.

Police charged Boikov with assault and causing actual bodily harm. His passport and parole were revoked on the eve of the flight to Moscow.

“The government want me, want me badly. I can be of no use if I’m in prison bail denied or parole or whatever. I can’t broadcast,” he said.

“They call me Putin’s patriot, Putin’s main man in Australia, do we trust the Australian police to give me a fair go after what they did to me last time?”

A magistrate convicted Boikov in absentia in February and issued a second arrest warrant.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676804

File: 836bab78a6ab43d⋯.jpg (147.58 KB,1064x714,76:51,Simeon_Boikov_meets_Igor_G….jpg)

File: a7c610b7be5b238⋯.jpg (186.13 KB,880x1298,40:59,Boikov_s_official_request_….jpg)

File: f7fb913630cec83⋯.jpg (123.48 KB,977x757,977:757,Boikov_with_priests_and_of….jpg)

>>18676802

2/2

Boikov became notorious for visiting Russia, where he posed with guns, and for celebrating Putin’s growing authoritarianism while dressed in military fatigues.

Born in Sydney but of Russian heritage, Boikov visited his ancestral homeland in 2014 and met one of the three Russian nationalists later convicted in absentia and sentenced to life imprisonment for downing the passenger airliner MH17 over Ukraine.

Boikov refuses to accept a European court’s ruling that pro-Russian forces committed the mass murder of 298 people including 38 Australians. He called it a “tragedy” but believes it was an accident.

On return to Sydney, he was questioned by multiple security agencies before being released.

But his following grew dramatically during the pandemic as he railed against vaccines and lockdowns.

“I think he was hitting the prominent core themes of the freedom rallies: the government as the problem, ‘they’re trying to control you’, the anti-vaccine mandates,” said Dr Josh Roose, a researcher of right-wing extremism.

“He certainly exploited the lockdown to increase his profile.”

Boikov would drive around Sydney with the Eureka flag flapping behind his car, filming confrontations with police as they pulled him over and debated public health orders.

Police took a special interest in Boikov as he whipped up an audience online and crowds during anti-lockdown rallies.

“They were handing out infringements like confetti, load him up, get him off the road’,” Boikov said.

“The police turned me into what I am.”

Roose said Boikov had come full circle since the Ukraine invasion, pivoting once more to become Australia’s number one Putin propagandist.

“He’s no Julian Assange … He’s a cheerleader for Russian fascism and anti-democratic forces in Australia,” Roose said.

“The Russians may well have chosen a more articulate figurehead, I think he’s an accidental one, I think they don’t know what to do with him.”

YouTube’s ban has relegated Boikov to obscure corners of the internet where his remaining tens of thousands of followers laud Putin’s bloody invasion and spread unhinged conspiracy theories.

If Boikov reaches Russia he said he would avoid the conflict zone because it would be a “waste of talent” to hand him a Kalashnikov.

“The fighting for me is all on the political front and informational front, that’s my interest,” he said.

The Herald understands diplomatic discussions are under way about how to get Boikov out of Australia, but he said his links to the Kremlin were overblown.

“It demoralises me sometimes, I just wish someone [from Russian officialdom] would say ‘well done for f-ck sake’,” he laughed. “What saves me is there is no formal link to the Russian government.”

If Boikov is not a useful trade, he may be forced to leave the consulate and finish his time in prison in Australia. Only then will he be able to get on a plane to Moscow.

Inside the consulate hallways, diplomatic staff keep a distance. His wife visits him each day to cook.

Boikov said that “distance” is probably for everyone’s benefit.

“The Russian government … see me as unpredictable, unhinged, uncontrolled. That’s why I have gotten away with it,” he said.

“Am I an agent of influence? Yes. But am I an agent of foreign influence? No.”

The Russian consulate was approached for comment.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/hiding-in-the-russian-consulate-for-months-aussie-cossack-demands-a-prisoner-swap-20230405-p5cyb5.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676820

File: dfba7a4008d2753⋯.jpg (429.21 KB,825x872,825:872,DOU_3.jpg)

File: e7725701b17ff22⋯.mp4 (7.23 MB,640x360,16:9,qbDISXI3gqJXVAbv.mp4)

File: 65fa8db86216625⋯.jpg (2.8 MB,3957x2989,3957:2989,The_vehicles_are_named_aft….jpg)

File: d98ff6fce9245f0⋯.jpg (687.3 KB,5568x3712,3:2,During_a_visit_to_Australi….jpg)

‘Our soldiers’ new crush’: Ukraine enlists AC/DC in plea for Australian Hawkei military vehicles

Matthew Knott - April 11, 2023

The Ukrainian government has taken to social media to plead with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to donate protected mobility vehicles to help beat back invading Russian forces, describing the Australian-made four-wheel drives as its new military “crush”.

The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age revealed in September that Ukraine was lobbying for Australia to send a fleet of Hawkei vehicles to test them in a war zone, but the government has declined to provide any despite repeated requests.

The patrol vehicles, which have never been used on a battlefield, were specially designed and manufactured for the Australian Defence Force at defence contractor Thales’ facility in Bendigo, Victoria.

In a Twitter message posted on Tuesday, Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence said: “Our soldiers absolutely love Australian Bushmasters. But now they have a new crush: the Hawkei. These two would be a perfect match on the battlefield.

“We would truly appreciate their reunion in Ukraine, @AlboMP!”

The post was accompanied by a minute-long video, set to a soundtrack of AC/DC’s Back in Black, showing Hawkeis in action and describing them as a “perfect reconnaissance vehicle”.

Hawkeis, which can carry up to six soldiers, have removable armour and optional mounts for weapons including automatic grenade launchers.

Importantly, they are light enough to be transported by helicopter, allowing them to be airlifted directly onto the battlefield.

The vehicles are named after Acanthophis hawkei, a species of the death adder snake named in honour of former prime minister Bob Hawke.

During a visit to Australia last month, Yuriy Sak, an adviser to the Ukrainian defence minister, urged Australia to use Ukraine as a testing lab for the Hawkei vehicles, which were plagued by braking problems during the construction phase.

Sak said the vehicles would help Ukraine in a planned counter-offensive over the European summer.

He said Australia would send an important message to the world by providing brand new, rather than second-hand, equipment to Ukraine and could spur similar pledges from other nations.

“This will send a signal across the international community that the Ukrainian army will be supported with the best weaponry that the civilised world has at the moment,” he said.

Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said his nation was deeply grateful for the support from Canberra, but that Australia was beginning to fall behind other nations in terms of military aid.

Japan and Sweden had overtaken Australia as the largest non-NATO providers of military aid to Ukraine, he said.

“Everywhere I go, Australians tell me Australia can and should do more to help Ukraine,” he said.

Australia has provided an estimated $510 million in military assistance to Ukraine since the Russian invasion last February, including 90 Bushmaster protected mobility vehicles plus armoured vehicles and ammunition.

A spokeswoman for Defence Minister Richard Marles said the government was committed to delivering on its current contribution to Ukraine.

“As the deputy prime minister has said, Australia will stand with Ukraine for the duration of this conflict so that Ukraine is in a position to determine the outcome of this conflict on its terms,” she said.

“The government will continue to review its response options in relation to the evolving situation in Ukraine.”

Speaking at a Lowy Institute event on Tuesday, Australian Defence Force Chief General Angus Campbell said: “Our government has made it clear that we continue and we will continue to support Ukraine. The form of that support is a matter for government.”

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/our-soldiers-new-crush-ukraine-enlists-acdc-in-plea-for-australian-hawkei-military-vehicles-20230411-p5czkt.html

https://twitter.com/DefenceU/status/1645547205158408193

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676828

File: 2029cb2b6e690ea⋯.jpg (159.51 KB,1240x744,5:3,Julian_Assange_is_in_custo….jpg)

File: 194629f006f0a94⋯.jpg (563.49 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0001.jpg)

File: 23bbb29deacce1a⋯.jpg (276.23 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0002.jpg)

File: 92b01bacb43ce70⋯.jpg (176.22 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0003.jpg)

File: 7abf2f710dd169f⋯.pdf (44.01 KB,230411_The_Hon_Merrick_B_G….pdf)

Dozens of Australian politicians urge US to abandon Julian Assange extradition

Daniel Hurst - 11 Apr 2023

Australian federal politicians from across the political spectrum have jointly asked the US attorney general, Merrick Garland, to abandon attempts to extradite Julian Assange from the UK.

The 48 MPs and senators – including 13 from the governing Labor party – warned that the pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder “set a dangerous precedent” for press freedom and would damage the reputation of the US.

Assange, an Australian citizen, remains in Belmarsh prison in London as he fights a US attempt to extradite him to face charges in connection with the publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents about the Afghanistan and Iraq wars as well as diplomatic cables.

In an open letter published on Tuesday, the Labor, Coalition, Greens and crossbench politicians implored Garland to “drop the extradition proceedings and allow Mr Assange to return home”.

“If the extradition request is approved, Australians will witness the deportation of one of our citizens from one Aukus partner to another – our closest strategic ally – with Mr Assange facing the prospect of spending the rest of his life in prison,” the letter said.

“This would set a dangerous precedent for all global citizens, journalists, publishers, media organizations and the freedom of the press. It would also be needlessly damaging for the US as a world leader on freedom of expression and the rule of law.”

The letter said the charges – which include 17 counts under the Espionage Act and one count under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act – pertained to Assange’s actions “as a journalist and publisher” in publishing information “with evidence of war crimes, corruption and human rights abuses”.

The MPs and senators contrasted the ongoing pursuit of Assange with the case of the former US army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, who was released in 2017 when Barack Obama commuted her 35-year military prison sentence for leaking the information.

The letter said Assange – who initially took refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London – “has been effectively incarcerated for well over a decade in one form or another, yet the person who leaked classified information had their sentence commuted and has been able to participate in American society since 2017”.

The independent MP Andrew Wilkie, who co-chairs the Parliamentary Friends of Julian Assange Group, initiated the letter. It coincides with the fourth anniversary of Assange being detained in Belmarsh prison.

Wilkie said the 48 Australian federal parliamentarians were acting “in concert with similar letters from parliamentarians from around the world” and together they represented millions of constituents.

“This is no small matter and must not be dismissed,” Wilkie said. “Nor should it be ignored that the outpouring of political concern spans the political spectrum and is based on a diverse range of reasons.”

Assange’s father, John Shipton, said his son had been living under “a pall of shame and disgrace”.

Shipton said the decision by the new Australian high commissioner to the UK, Stephen Smith, to visit Belmarsh prison last week marked “the beginning of the end of this bleak, severe frost on truth and destruction of Julian Assange”.

Greg Barns SC, a legal adviser to the Assange campaign, said the US attempt to prosecute Assange was “dangerous” because it meant “any journalist or publisher anywhere in the world could face extradition to the US for exposing material Washington doesn’t want you to know about”.

The Australian foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, warned late last month that there were limits to what diplomacy could achieve.

But she said Australia would continue to express the view to both the US and UK governments that the case against Assange “has dragged on long enough and should be brought to a close”.

The 13 Labor MPs to sign Tuesday’s letter were Michelle Ananda-Rajah, Mike Freelander, Julian Hill, Peter Khalil, Tania Lawrence, Zaneta Mascarenhas, Brian Mitchell, Alicia Payne, Graham Perrett, Susan Templeman, Maria Vamvakinou, Josh Wilson and Tony Zappia.

The highest profile Coalition signatories were the former deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce and the MP for Bass, Bridget Archer.

The Greens leader, Adam Bandt, was joined by many of his party colleagues in signing it, while independent MPs and senators were also well represented.

Comment was sought from the US embassy in Canberra, but the White House has previously said Joe Biden was “committed to an independent Department of Justice” when asked about the Assange case.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/apr/11/julian-assange-australian-politicians-urge-merrick-garland-united-states-us-attorney-general-to-abandon-extradition

https://twitter.com/AssangeCampaign/status/1645683151614640128

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676832

File: 3a3670eea8ae502⋯.jpg (83.93 KB,800x600,4:3,British_MPs_are_increasing….jpg)

File: 81249aa4fc2c2f7⋯.png (44.42 KB,694x827,694:827,FtY6V9VWYAEaH8W.png)

File: e73d1be3a194ea4⋯.png (27.03 KB,670x861,670:861,FtY6XY6XoAAkv_o.png)

File: bf9cc0df41ce86b⋯.jpg (19.66 KB,474x619,474:619,FtY6ZFBWYAE_sX8.jpg)

>>18676828

UK MPs implore US A-G to drop Assange extradition

Ben Mitchell - April 11 2023

A letter to the US attorney-general has been signed by 35 British parliamentarians calling for extradition proceedings to be dropped against Julian Assange, on the fourth anniversary of his detention at Belmarsh prison.

Richard Burgon, Labour MP for Leeds East, organised the letter, which has been given the support of MPs and members of the House of Lords from six parties.

They call on Merrick Garland to drop the proceedings, which date back to former US president Donald Trump's administration and, it is claimed, relate to Assange's "role as a journalist and publisher in publishing evidence of war crimes, corruption and human rights abuses".

Assange is being held on remand as he challenges the High Court's ruling that he should be extradited to the United States to face trial after leaking military documents.

Mr Burgon said: "British parliamentarians are increasingly alarmed by the potential extradition of Julian Assange to the United States.

"Any extradition would, in effect, be putting press freedom on trial. It would set a dangerous precedent for journalists and publishers around the world.

"Four years on since Julian Assange was first detained in Belmarsh high-security prison, now is the right moment to draw a line under this outrageous prosecution initiated by the Trump administration, drop the charges against Julian Assange and allow him to return home to Australia."

Signatories include Conservative MP David Davis, Caroline Lucas of the Green Party, Jeremy Corbyn, Angus MacNeil of the Scottish National Party and Liz Saville-Roberts of Plaid Cymru.

The letter says: "If Mr Assange were to be extradited to the United States, he faces a prison sentence of up to 175 years for his publishing work which was carried out in the United Kingdom and in partnership with globally leading news outlets.

"This would clearly have a chilling impact on journalism and would set a dangerous precedent for other journalists and media organisations. It would also undermine the US's reputation on freedom of expression and the rule of law."

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8154043/uk-mps-implore-us-a-g-to-drop-assange-extradition/

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1645567033860558850

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18676841

File: 44dd98add4efe21⋯.jpg (216.99 KB,1298x336,649:168,MRF_D_55.jpg)

File: 8e2aea162f95648⋯.jpg (454.26 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,340520333_809457460599005_….jpg)

Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post

10 April 2023

Leaders of Marine Rotational Force Darwin meet with Ambassador Caroline Kennedy at the U.S. Embassy Australia. The annual rotation of Marines underpins the illustrious history shared between the United States and Australia.

#AlliesandPartners #marines

(courtesy photo by U.S. Embassy Australia)

https://www.facebook.com/MRFDarwin/posts/593606036135217

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682130

File: 480ef0e5fffdc00⋯.jpg (69.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser_the_oppositi….jpg)

>>18676743

Anthony Albanese runs serious risk of dividing instead of uniting the nation, warns former Liberal frontbencher Julian Leeser

ROSIE LEWIS - APRIL 12, 2023

1/2

Julian Leeser has issued a stark warning to Anthony Albanese that his government risks dividing the country by failing to ­“seriously engage” with Coalition voters who want to support an ­Indigenous voice but have ­concerns over the model, after he quit the opposition frontbench and vowed to back the Yes campaign during the referendum.

Mr Leeser resigned as opposition legal affairs and Indigenous Australians spokesman on Tuesday and promised to do everything he could to put the Albanese government’s proposed constitutional amendment on a “surer footing” before ultimately campaigning in support of the Yes side.

He declared “the time for the voice has come”.

Mr Leeser’s decision to quit the frontbench means Peter Dutton faces a mini-reshuffle within days and growing divisions in his party despite Mr Leeser’s stressing that he had resigned without bitterness and remained loyal to his party and “fully committed to the leadership of Peter Dutton”.

His departure from the frontbench comes just days after former cabinet minister Ken Wyatt quit the party altogether over its stance on the voice and Tasmanian Liberal MP Bridget Archer warned the party was at a crossroads.

“I’m resigning without rancour but on a point of principle,” Mr Leeser said. “What I want to be able to say to my children in the ­future is that ‘your father stood up for something he believes in’ and that’s really important and that’s what all of us as parliamentarians should do.

“My resignation as a frontbencher is not about personality, it’s about keeping faith with an issue that I have been working on for almost a decade.

“I’ve also tried to keep faith with my Liberal values: my desire to conserve our institutions like the Australian Constitution with my desire to seek better outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.”

But Mr Leeser warned the Prime Minster: “The risk to our country and the risk to our shared national reconciliation project of failure needs to be recognised by the government. An all-or-nothing approach could deliver nothing. That’s why we must find common ground.”

Indigenous leaders and supporters of the voice hailed Mr Leeser’s decision to resign, saying it showed he put principle ahead of politics, while NSW Liberal senator Andrew Bragg – who backs the idea of the voice – believed a Yes vote was now more likely.

Liberal MPs were dismissive of the prospect of Mr Leeser’s resignation harming Mr Dutton’s leadership, noting an overwhelming majority of the party room backed the position endorsed by the Opposition Leader last Wednesday.

With two senior portfolios needing to be filled, Mr Dutton said he would give “some consideration” to who could replace Mr Leeser over the next few days or week. Northern Territory Country Liberal Party senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and South Australian Liberal senator Kerrynne Liddle were flagged by colleagues as two possible contenders to take on the Indigenous Australians portfolio. There was speculation frontbenchers with a legal background – such as Michaelia Cash and Paul Fletcher – could take on legal affairs.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682133

File: 269a703dcca6af8⋯.jpg (99.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_and_Julian_Le….jpg)

>>18682130

2/2

Mr Dutton is due visit Alice Springs on Wednesday after ­repeatedly calling for a royal commission into the crime wave and “unconscionable” sexual abuse of Indigenous youth in the town. The Opposition Leader said he was “very happy” with his party’s position on the voice and his overarching test was whether a decision or policy was in the country’s best interest.

“After having studied this issue for months and months, after having spoken to literally hundreds of people around the country, after visiting very desperate situations in some regional communities, I do not believe that the Canberra voice is in our country’s best interests,” Mr Dutton said.

“You change the Constitution and you change the country. We live in one of the most stable democracies in the world and the underpinning of that is the Constitution.” ”

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney acknowledged Mr Leeser’s decision to resign would not have been easy but praised him for showing “strength today in putting his principles ahead of politics”. “(Mr Leeser’s) decision reflects his long-held commitment to constitutional recognition through a voice, and an understanding that this year’s referendum is a once-in-a-generation chance to make a real difference in the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and help close the gap,” Ms Burney said.

“He knows how much work has gone in to getting Australia this far on the journey to reconciliation.”

Indigenous leader Marcia Langton praised Mr Leeser’s integrity for supporting the voice but said his push to alter the referendum question showed he “remains confused”.

The Liberal Party has rejected a national voice enshrined in the Constitution and instead will advocate for legislated regional and local advisory bodies. The party supports constitutional recognition.

The position was reached two days after Mr Leeser put his own model forward, in which a voice would be established in the Constitution but the parliament would have complete say over its scope and functions.

The Australian understands Mr Leeser urged shadow cabinet to put his model to the parliamentary committee scrutinising the government’s referendum question and constitutional amendment, in the hope the process could help move Labor.

He also appealed to senior colleagues not to make a final decision on the voice until after the committee had completed its work and argued everyone in the party – including shadow cabinet ministers – should get a free vote, but was rebuffed.

His model was never taken to the Liberal partyroom, though a commitment to local and regional legislated voices – which formed part of Mr Leeser’s proposal – was adopted.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-risks-divided-nation-warns-libs-yes-guy/news-story/5760bb78044a6a07e712eba01f566dc6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682138

File: c91015dcc9107e0⋯.jpg (76.13 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser_resigns_from….jpg)

>>18676743

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sacrificed nothing in debate of principles

GREG CRAVEN - APRIL 12, 2023

1/2

The commonly accepted virtues of politics are ruthlessness, guile and self-belief. Moral conviction, decency and the ability to see past the next week are dispensable.

These realities starkly underline the resignation from the frontbench of Julian Leeser.

Leeser walked rather than be muzzled in his support of the Indigenous voice to parliament. He was there when the voice was designed. He advocated strongly for its creation.

When the Albanese government failed on process and substance, he belled the cat but never wavered on the principle. Now, as usual in politics, the price of honesty is death. Or, at least in the case of the talented Leeser, a period of suspended animation.

Leeser was forced to resign by the Coalition’s decision to actively oppose the voice. Backbenchers still could speak freely but members of the shadow ministry were gagged, conscience or otherwise.

This is in stark contrast to the republican referendum in 1999, when Liberal cabinet titans such as Peter Costello and John Fahey publicly fought for the republic. Some conservatives argue the voice is not a true issue of conscience. They are glibly wrong. For many conservatives – such as Leeser – the voice is a fundamentally moral issue. Looking at the past and present treatment of Indigenous people, they are morally impelled to act.

This does not mean other people with different perceptions are immoral. Everyone is entitled to their own moral precepts, but that means everyone, including Leeser and fellow thinkers.

Writing as a Catholic, it is no surprise to me that this stand by Leeser comes from a Jew. Mosaic Law always impels conscience over expedience. The tragedy of centuries of Jewish persecution sharpens the imperative for fair treatment of disdained people within our own commonwealth.

Conservative political theory follows the Judaeo-Christian lead. Before and after Edmund Burke, it has held rigorously that conscience coerced is no real conscience. In hindsight, the free vote for frontbenchers on the republic but not for the voice is truly remarkable. The republic was not a moral issue. It involved no element of conscience or ethics. It was a mere judgment on constitutional structure.

The precedent now set for conservatives by the voice is chilling. The more something matters, the less you can act according to basic precepts. There are other frontbenchers who also dissent from the opposition’s stand on the voice. But do they have the moral guts to join Leeser? Perhaps not.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682139

File: 09569516991609d⋯.jpg (120 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser_Peter_Dutton….jpg)

>>18682138

2/2

Leeser has worn much conservative criticism over the voice. He has been accused of being soft, wet, incapable and a closet leftie. But the nastiest barbs were delivered by Anthony Albanese during the past fortnight as the Coalition was limped towards its position.

Leeser was necessarily silent but the Prime Minister ridiculed him as an original architect of the voice who was now a backslider and a moral coward. Yet Albanese has not shed one drop of blood for the voice. He has not been abused by political allies. He certainly has not sacrificed any advancement. Rather, he has bathed in worship as a future Labor hero. It is Leeser, not Albanese, who has suffered for the courage of his convictions. The Prime Minister might privately admit to shame.

One of Leeser’s problems has been the utter inability of the Australian news cycle to understand any sophisticated political position. It cannot cope with anything beyond Yes or No. But Leeser has the basic intellectual capacity to support the voice while critiquing its form. Such weakness.

Leeser tried for sensible compromise to the end. He proposed in a recent speech at the National Press Club that if only Albanese were open to amending his draft, there was a plausible road forward for the Voice. But government and opposition ignored him. Which leaves Leeser and the entire nation trapped between a government resolutely refusing to follow proper process or negotiate, and an opposition driven by short term politics and demagoguery.

The last chance now is the Parliamentary Committee considering the Albanese amendment. Sadly, its work has been greatly compromised by the Opposition’s rejection of the Voice in advance of its hearings.

It is desperately important that the Committee – if only its Coalition members – identify the best possible compromise, even if they themselves remain opposed to the Voice. This is the only wafer-thin chance of avoiding a fully partisan referendum.

One further issue is Leeser’s own future. In a miasma of self-serving politics, his position reflects genuinely liberal principle. As the Coalition struggles out of electoral defeat and philosophical confusion, it is a fair bet he will emerge only the stronger. The other question concerns the position of principled conservatives who – like Leeser – support the voice but strain at its constitutional implementation. Until now, constitutional scruples have interrupted moral support. But with Leeser’s bruising experience, all bets are off.

Emeritus professor Greg Craven is a constitutional lawyer.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/pm-has-sacrificed-nothing-in-debate-of-principles/news-story/80b10a1260a2ccfbe07e13a1b2be0fb2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682146

File: 12ac75317b5529d⋯.jpg (130.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>18676743

Voice to parliament report exposes plenty of flaws, but no real solutions

WARREN MUNDINE - APRIL 12, 2023

1/2

This year Australians will be asked to vote on the most significant change to our system of government since Federation – a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice to parliament.

It’s the voice to everyone on everything that will expose every government decision and policy to delay and/or judicial challenge and influence the lives of not just Aboriginal people, but all Australians. Before Australians vote whether to up-end our democratic system, we should understand the nature of the beast. Although he won’t discuss the details, Anthony Albanese intends to implement the 2021 Indigenous Voice Co-design Process Report to the Australian government by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton.

The report is 270 pages long and stands almost 3cm high on my desk. Because the concept is so complicated it takes many, many words to explain it. It’s so impenetrable, I know highly educated people who’ve struggled to get through it.

Yet it’s this document Albanese has told people to read if they want to know how the voice will work. He seems to have stopped this lately – perhaps he finally looked at it himself and thought twice about encouraging anyone else near it. It’s dense, complex, padded with bureaucratese and hard to decipher. An abomination is a better word.

It’s entirely unsuitable to inform ordinary Australians about such a fundamental change to our democracy and system of government. The report introduces the voice concept as “an urgent solution to the ongoing predicament of Indigenous Australians” with “a robust and feasible means of producing outcomes”. Nowhere in this report are these desirable outcomes described, in any detail or by reference whatsoever.

The report assumes Indigenous people want “a greater say on the laws, policies and programs that affect our lives” and that “non-Indigenous Australians support that call”. What laws? What policies and programs? I can’t think of any that treat Aboriginal people unfairly or were designed without extensive consultation with Indigenous people. The opposite. And there’s no indication of how this will alleviate Aboriginal disadvantage.

The report claims Indigenous people have been calling for a national-level mechanism to have a greater say in Australian government laws, policies and decisions. Really? I think this call comes from a small minority of Aboriginal people from community organisations and academia who already advise government and have been amply funded over years to deliver improvements with little to show for it. Those groups will become the iceberg to the voice’s tip in a complex local, regional and national apparatus.

It’s the responsibility of the Australian parliament to legislate and of public servants to develop and implement policy at relevant ministers’ direction. And within that existing framework, we’ve had a huge increase in Indigenous participation over recent decades. Indigenous Australians are now a significant minority in the federal parliament, above parity.

Indigenous communities, organisations and individuals enjoy a close relationship with local members and a formal, integrated role in advising relevant ministers. Importantly, governments remain the largest employers of Indigenous people and these Indigenous public servants are right now administering the very policies and programs that impact Indigenous communities.

Indigenous people already have a voice, many voices. The report ignores the real gains made in incorporating Indigenous people into the democratic political process that serves all Australians well. The report has so many assumptions, but so little real data.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682149

File: bc0d1cc9abb0bf3⋯.jpg (95.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Aboriginal_and_Torr….jpg)

File: b2062e921430767⋯.jpg (98.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Marcia_Langton_speaks_at_a….jpg)

>>18682146

2/2

Firstly, it’s built on the assumption that having Aboriginal people speaking to parliament and government and having their say on legislation and policy will somehow address the “ongoing predicament” of Indigenous Australians. I can’t see this happening at all.

There’s also an assumption that this ongoing predicament will somehow be solved by the workings of government, when it is government policy and programs that figure most prominently in Aboriginal peoples’ lives already. The report never considers that may, in fact, be the root of the problem.

It’s evident, in these pages, that the voice process will create chaos and is likely to be unmanageable. How many different Indigenous voices will be heard on any particular legislation, decision or policy? There will be conflicting voices within “the voice” and competing agendas. Will Bills have to be drafted and re-drafted in response to the concerns of the voice? Will Ministerial decisions and policies need a voice sign off. And what if there is a dissenting or minority position within the voice?

Blackfellas aren’t all the same. We can’t speak for each other’s countries. And even within our own country, we don’t always see eye-to-eye. No one expects this of non-Aboriginal people. Australia’s system of government has a process for reaching decisions in a large, diverse society, built on nearly a thousand years of precedent and tradition in the Westminster system. There’s no proposed process for decision-making in the report.

The voice is predicated on an assumption of wholesale failure and crisis in Aboriginal communities. It’s true some communities are in crisis, but the suggestion a voice could have prevented problems like those we’ve seen recently in Alice Springs is just plain wrong.

A national voice couldn’t respond adequately even in a preventive manner. And, fundamentally, those problems stem from too many Aboriginal people not participating in the real economy. Being so tied to the public purse, the voice won’t have the first clue how to tackle that.

The voice as articulated by the Calma-Langton report is fatally flawed: flawed in its claim this is what Aboriginal people want, flawed in its proposed structure and flawed in its approach to representation.

Warren Mundine is a businessman and advocate for Indigenous economic participation. Research by Vicki Grieves Williams, academic, historian and Warraimaay woman, also contributed to this article.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/voice-report-shows-plenty-of-flaws-but-no-real-solutions/news-story/c740b04af68cf96252680dae44951180

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682151

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18670474

Go inside one of the most powerful warships in the world

CNN

Apr 6, 2023

CNN's Will Ripley reports exclusively from one of the most powerful warships on the planet, the USS Mississippi, a U.S. nuclear submarine that's on high alert for threats from China.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he_szwyEpFk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682161

File: c8c977f8a163e1e⋯.jpg (1.21 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Defence_Force_chief_Genera….jpg)

Defence chief Angus Campbell warns of 'uncomfortable days' ahead on Afghanistan war crimes action

Andrew Greene - 11 April 2023

Australia's Defence chief has declined to say how many senior officers have faced punishment over the damning findings of the Afghanistan war crimes inquiry, but has warned of "uncomfortable days" ahead as more disciplinary action is taken.

In a rare public speaking engagement in Sydney, General Angus Campbell also praised the Ukrainian armed forces, described an apparent intelligence leak from the Pentagon as "serious", and was quizzed on military tensions in the Taiwan Strait.

Addressing the Lowy Institute, General Campbell hailed the "extraordinarily impressive" work of Ukraine's military in fighting Russia's invasion, but warned the war was likely to be prolonged as long as both sides had the "will" to maintain the fight.

"What we see from the President [Zelenskyy], all the way through the Ukrainian people, is utter commitment to fight to recover Ukraine. Sovereign, territorially, whole, and free," he said.

The general said the material support being provided by Western allies including Australia, as well as the "extraordinary skill and rapidity of learning" shown by Ukrainian forces was the factor most likely to shift the war in favour of the besieged nation.

He noted Russia lacked the same level of "tactical" skill and innovation while adding he was "hopeful of what Ukraine may be able to achieve".

General quizzed on Brereton Inquiry action two years on from findings

Following his prepared remarks, the Defence chief was asked about whether the ADF was bracing for more war crime charges and reputational damage from the Afghanistan war, a month after the arrest of a veteran from the Special Air Service Regiment (SASR).

"The Office of the Special Investigator (OSI), which is working independent of Defence, has seen a first arrest and charging of a former soldier," General Campbell noted.

"There may be others and that is a matter for the OSI and ultimately then a matter for the Commonwealth's Director of Public Prosecutions.

"I don't look to the question of how do I protect my reputation or the reputation of the Australian Defence Force, instead I ask the question; what is the correct values and behaviours and purpose to which we should be applying our effort — and reputation emerges.

"It's really important to support the people who are involved but to recognise that if we have failed as an organisation then we need to face that; and this is part of that story, and we are individually and collectively better for it if we do so.

"You won't see me trying to gloss over these things, and I think that there could be some very uncomfortable days coming forward, a matter for the OSI, a matter for the courts. What matters to me; values, behaviours and mission of the Australian Defence Force – that's what builds reputation."

Pressed further on his own view of command responsibility and how many senior officers had faced internal disciplinary action since the handing down of the Brereton report in November 2020, General Campbell declined to give details.

"That work continues, and I am not at liberty to speak to it until it has been completed. But we have undertaken the work as recommended by Justice Brereton under accountability."

Last year Veterans' groups demanded the Albanese government pull rank on the Defence chief to prevent him revoking medals over command failures in Afghanistan, before any alleged war crimes were proven in court.

Special forces insiders claim morale at the Perth-based SASR remains at "rock bottom" with many soldiers deciding to voluntarily discharge.

'Serious' Pentagon leaks and growing Taiwan tensions

General Campbell said reports of a likely large intelligence leak in the United States was a "serious" incident, noting that American authorities were now engaging with partners to understand the consequences.

"The issue of maintaining the security of information is critical to the development of national capability and to the trust and confidence across allies and partners. I appreciate this, by reports, it is a serious leak," he said.

"I am not, obviously as a military officer, someone who believes all information should be free and I do believe that there is a national interest in the protection of some information."

General Campbell was also circumspect when asked about growing tensions between Beijing and Washington over Taiwan, and whether Australia could be dragged into a future conflict.

"Anything that undermines the security stability and the prosperity of the Indo-Pacific region in which we live is of interest to Australia."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-11/uncomfotable-days-ahead-defence-chief-campbell-says/102210800

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682169

File: e8fe03bdea22b08⋯.jpg (84.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Tasmanian_Premier_Jeremy_R….jpg)

Quarter of Tasmania’s population hacked by Russians, says Premier Jeremy Rockliff

MATTHEW DENHOLM - APRIL 11, 2023

Up to a quarter of Tasmanians may have had personal data stolen by Russian-linked hackers, the Premier has suggested.

Jeremy Rockliff on Tuesday said the scale of the hack of Education Department data handled by third-party transfer system GoAnywhere MFT had emerged after a “very complex analysis”.

Asked how many Tasmanians were affected by the data breach – which includes names and addresses, including of schoolchildren, as well as some bank details – Mr Rockliff said this was being “worked through”.

“My information is 145,683 emails have been sent to people that have had a potential breach (of their data),” Mr Rockliff said.

An additional 2500 people had been informed via mail of the ­potential theft of data, and a further 377 told by telephone.

Mr Rockliff said about 16,000 documents had been released ­online by the hackers.

Cybersecurity expert CyberCX has been hired to assist the government in understanding and responding to the attack.

The data was collected by various agencies controlled by the Department of Education, Children and Young People and was stolen in March by Russian-linked cyber criminals.

Agencies affected include the Teachers Registration Board, ­Office of the Education Registrar, Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification, Commissioner for Children and Young People, Government Education and Training International and Libraries Tasmania.

The department has said the data could include bank accounts, and children’s names, addresses, school name, reference numbers, homeroom and year group, and TAFE students’ dates of birth. Mr Rockliff said “no stone would be left unturned” in investigating and responding to the breach.

While no further data had been released in recent days, Tasmanians potentially affected “need to be vigilant”.

“I am not aware of any demand for a ransom,” Mr Rockliff said, adding that he was also unaware of anyone having money taken from bank accounts.

He promised a “very thorough review” of the government’s cyber security protections.

The government is also under fire over a letter sent by Police Commissioner Donna Adams and chief bureaucrat Jenny Gale to news organisations and MPs urging them to curtail coverage of the massive data breach.

Labor has accused the government of “serious mismanagement” of the data breach. Opposition technology spokeswoman Jen Butler questioned why the information was not encrypted or password-protected.

“Labor has asked on numerous occasions how widespread the government’s use of Go­Anywhere MFT was, but all we’ve received is radio silence,” Ms ­Butler said.

“Why wasn’t this information end-to-end encrypted and where is the Education Minister Roger Jaensch to provide guidance and leadership to those families impacted?” she said.

“Every day the Liberals seem to find a new way to mismanage this crisis. Premier Rockliff is responsible for his ministers and right now they’re failing Tasmanians,” she said.

Those affected have been advised to be watchful for any “suspicious financial activity or attempted scams”.

Mr Rockliff said anyone who believed they might have been ­affected by the cyber attack should call 1800 567 567.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/quarter-of-tasmanias-population-hacked-by-russians-says-premier-jeremy-rockliff/news-story/7b4287609e7045e2931efcb261a958b5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682176

File: 897859410c2bb6d⋯.jpg (3.72 MB,5760x3840,3:2,Crikey_alleges_Lachlan_Mur….jpg)

File: a33230f85908cd2⋯.jpg (195.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Rupert_Murdoch_left_and_La….jpg)

Crikey alleges Lachlan Murdoch morally culpable for Capitol riots

Zoe Samios and Michaela Whitbourn - April 12, 2023

Online news outlet Crikey has alleged Lachlan Murdoch was “morally and ethically” culpable for the deadly 2021 US Capitol riots in its amended defence to the defamation suit filed by the elder son of Rupert Murdoch, in an escalation of the dispute between the parties.

Crikey’s publisher Private Media will also attempt to use testimony by Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch in a US lawsuit about Fox News’ coverage of the 2020 presidential election as part of its amended defence, which adds a new defence known as contextual truth.

The contextual truth defence requires Crikey to prove that the article at the centre of the lawsuit conveys additional defamatory meanings to those alleged by Lachlan Murdoch, and that those meanings are both true and of sufficient seriousness that no further harm was caused to his reputation by any other meanings.

Murdoch junior, chief executive of Fox Corporation and co-chairman of News Corp, filed Federal Court defamation proceedings in August against Crikey over a June 29, 2022 article naming his family as “unindicted co-conspirators” of Trump following the US Capitol riots in 2021.

Lachlan Murdoch claims the article conveys up to 14 false and defamatory meanings including that he “illegally conspired with Donald Trump to incite an armed mob to march on the Capitol” following the 2020 presidential election.

Crikey denies that those meanings were conveyed. However, if the court finds any of the meanings are conveyed and a serious harm test is satisfied, the news outlet will seek to rely on a new public interest defence.

The Crikey article was deleted on June 30, 2022, a day after it was published, before being reposted on August 15 that year. The amended defence, released publicly by the court on Wednesday, adds a contextual truth defence for the reposted article.

Crikey argues that – in addition to any of the meanings alleged by Murdoch junior – the reposted article says he is “morally and ethically culpable for the illegal January 6 attack because Fox News, under his control and management, promoted and peddled Trump’s lie of the stolen election despite Lachlan Murdoch knowing it was false”.

Crikey argues the reposted article also says that “Lachlan Murdoch’s unethical and reprehensible conduct in allowing Fox News to promote and peddle Trump’s lie of the stolen election, despite Lachlan Murdoch knowing it was false, makes him morally and ethically culpable for the illegal January 6 attack”.

Crikey says it can prove both of those meanings are true, and that no further harm was caused to Lachlan Murdoch’s reputation by publishing any of the meanings alleged by him that the court finds were conveyed by the article.

For this defence to succeed, the court would need to be satisfied that a finding of moral or ethical culpability for the riots was as damaging to Murdoch’s reputation as any of the other meanings it found the article conveyed, such as alleged criminality.

Sue Chrysanthou, SC, who is acting for Lachlan Murdoch, foreshadowed earlier this month that there would be an application to strike out the contextual truth defence.

Barrister Michael Hodge, KC, acting for Crikey, said in court earlier this month that the news outlet would seek to rely in part on material that has emerged in voting machine company Dominion Voting Systems’ US defamation suit against Fox News.

Dominion is suing Fox for $US1.6 billion ($2.3 billion) for allegedly knowingly airing false allegations that Dominion was involved in rigging the 2020 presidential election against Donald Trump. The US trial is expected to proceed in April.

Private Media’s amended defence extensively references the Dominion proceedings and a deposition given by Rupert Murdoch before the US trial.

It alleges Lachlan Murdoch knew the claim that the 2020 US presidential election was stolen from Trump was being promoted by presenters and guests of Fox News because he was watching the coverage, was directly involved in the news programming and was providing feedback on tone to Fox News chief executive Suzanne Scott.

“Between on or about 5 November 2020 and 6 January 2021, [Murdoch junior] … chose not to stop Fox News Channel from promoting the claim that the 2020 US Presidential Election was fraudulently stolen from Donald Trump because he considered it to be for the financial and commercial benefit of Fox Corporation, for Fox News Channel to promote the lie,” the defence alleges.

Murdoch is expected to argue Fox News also broadcast commentary rejecting claims the election had been stolen.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/crikey-alleges-lachlan-murdoch-morally-culpable-for-us-capitol-riot-20230411-p5czol.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682194

File: 9e57cf250245d2a⋯.jpg (1.14 MB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0001.jpg)

File: ec5a13d13e0efb3⋯.jpg (813.33 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0002.jpg)

File: b661e97c04dd1c5⋯.jpg (936.57 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0003.jpg)

Cardinal George Pell: A Reminiscence

Very Rev Peter G. Williams AM - 12 April 2023

Since his unexpected death on 10 January 2023 in Rome, there have been many words written about Cardinal George Pell.

Some of those assessments have been very positive and attested to his extraordinary input into the Church in Australia and internationally, and others have been highly critical and, in some instances, quite derogatory. There is little doubt that Cardinal Pell could be a polarising figure and anecdotally you either fell in the camp of being “for” or “against.”

My intention here is not to add to the body of opinion, which is now accumulating at a prodigious rate, but rather to reflect on my own encounters with Cardinal Pell given that I worked closely with him during the preparations and the execution of World Youth Day in Sydney in 2008.

Firstly, I remember clearly being asked to come to the Bishops’ Conference during one of their sessions by Bishop Kevin Manning, because, as he said: “The Cardinal would like to meet with you.” At our meeting, he told me of his intention to have me appointed as Director of Liturgy for World Youth Day and that he had already consulted Bishop Kevin who had agreed to release me. One thing that struck me was that he had a clear mind about what he wanted and he had thought carefully about the scope of the role and the sort of person he wanted to fill it.

Secondly, just before the Opening Mass at Barangaroo as the crowd had gathered and we were ten minutes from commencement, I received a message in the director’s tent that he wanted to see me. I thought that something must have gone wrong or there was a serious issue requiring resolution. I made my way through the crowds (estimated at between 125 and 150 thousand people) to under the liturgical platform. He was lined up in the procession with the other cardinals and bishops for the opening hymn and when I approached him I remarked: “You wanted to see me.” “Yes,” he beamed, “I just wanted to wish you good luck!” Clearly, he wanted to ease my anxiety and inject a small piece of humour into the occasion at a critical moment.

Thirdly, I had responsibility for preparing the liturgy booklet for the Dedication of the new altar in St Mary’s Cathedral by Pope Benedict XVI. In doing so, I had written a small piece to explain the significance of the relics that were to be placed in the altar as part of the liturgy. He told me in his study at St Mary’s Cathedral House how impressed he was with the booklet, and then enquired about the authorship of the paragraph on the relics. I told him, “I wrote it”, to which he replied, “It is very beautiful.” He was quite moved and I could sense his appreciation for not only what meagre contribution I might have made, but also that of my whole team.

Whilst I appreciate that there would be some people whose encounters with Cardinal Pell might have left them with a contrary view, my memories were positive.

That does not mean to say that you could not engage in combative discourse, and we certainly crossed swords on a number of occasions and over a number of issues, but he was always respectful, and I think he preferred the robust discussion rather than a disposition of obsequiousness. He was above all, as others have said, a man of his generation. There is no doubt that he was devoted to the Catholic Church, to the Church remaining strong and vibrant and remaining a significant voice in the marketplace. In that way, he was a dominating figure, not only because of his physical stature, but because he was unequivocating about his views on doctrine, morals and ecclesiology.

With the effluxion of time, others will evaluate his legacy, which I think was substantial in a number of positive ways. Perhaps we are still too close to his life and death to be completely objective, but the beauty of the passing of time is that it provides that space to revisit people’s lives with a different lens.

Very Rev Peter G. Williams AM is Vicar General and Moderator of the Curia in the Diocese of Parramatta and was Director of Liturgy for World Youth Day Sydney 2008.

https://catholicoutlook.org/cardinal-george-pell-a-reminiscence/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18682198

File: 5c28be7aed15129⋯.jpg (352.42 KB,852x496,213:124,Q_2590.jpg)

File: c6ad8342828bf77⋯.jpg (186.64 KB,852x455,852:455,Q_2594.jpg)

File: 1d68db16bbd941e⋯.jpg (545.06 KB,847x876,847:876,Q_2894.jpg)

>>18682194

Q Post #2590

Dec 12 2018 11:00:11 (EST)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6487315/High-profile-figure-convicted-suppression-orders-prevent-publication-persons-identity.html

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/why-the-media-is-unable-to-report-on-a-case-that-has-generated-huge-interest-online-20181212-p50lta.html

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/nsw/an-awful-crime-the-person-is-guilty-but-we-cant-publish-the-story-ng-4be7ee27075d4fb302aae9989c40ad34

[Cardinal Pell]

Dark to LIGHT.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#2590

https://archive.ph/20181212163320/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6487315/High-profile-figure-convicted-suppression-orders-prevent-publication-persons-identity.html

https://archive.ph/20181212122705/https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/why-the-media-is-unable-to-report-on-a-case-that-has-generated-huge-interest-online-20181212-p50lta.html

https://archive.ph/20181212193749/https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/nsw/an-awful-crime-the-person-is-guilty-but-we-cant-publish-the-story-ng-4be7ee27075d4fb302aae9989c40ad34

Q Post #2594

Dec 12 2018 11:29:43 (EST)

>He was the vatican treasurer I'm sure that carries some weight

#3 in the pecking order.

Define 'pecking' [animals].

Q

https://qanon.pub/#2594

Q Post #2894

Feb 25 2019 20:08:29 (EST)

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/02/25/australia/cardinal-george-pell-vatican-conviction-intl/index.html

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-47366113

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-abuse-pell/vatican-treasurer-pell-found-guilty-of-abusing-two-choir-boys-22-years-ago-idUSKCN1QF009

Many more to come?

Dark to LIGHT.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#2894

https://archive.ph/20190301020521/https://edition.cnn.com/2019/02/25/australia/cardinal-george-pell-vatican-conviction-intl/index.html

https://archive.ph/20190301014904/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-47366113

https://archive.ph/20190301014445/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-abuse-pell/vatican-treasurer-pell-found-guilty-of-abusing-two-choir-boys-22-years-ago-idUSKCN1QF009

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18687363

File: 653c745dc9d0332⋯.jpg (304.53 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: ad98c817304897c⋯.jpg (103.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18676743

Leeser v Dutton v Albanese: the rival voice models explained

Julian Leeser quit the Liberal front bench over the voice, despite his reservations about the PM’s model. Here we explain the alternative proposals put forward.

ROSIE LEWIS - April 13, 2023

1/2

A referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament will be held by the end of this year. So far, three models been put forward in a bid to achieve Constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We explain them here:

1. The Albanese model

The Albanese government’s and First Nations referendum working group’s model is the one Australians will most likely be voting on between October and December this year.

There may be some changes following a parliamentary committee process, but at the moment it would:

– Enshrine the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice in the Constitution.

– Give the voice power to make representations to the parliament and executive government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Indigenous Australians.

– Give the parliament power to make laws about how the voice would work – including its composition, functions, powers and procedures.

– Parliament would not be able to limit the broad scope of the voice, as that is also enshrined in the Constitution.

The voice question, announced by the government on March 23 reads:

“A proposed law: to alter the constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

Mr Albanese says the Labor government’s voice model will “strengthen parliament’s understanding not supplant its authority” and improve outcomes for Indigenous peoples. “This is not about symbolism, this is about recognition,” Mr Albanese said. “This is about making a practical difference, which we have a responsibility to do.”

2. The Dutton model

Peter Dutton and the Liberal Party have put forward an alternative proposal, with little meat put on the bones at this stage. It would:

– Recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Constitution, but not through a voice

– Regional and local voices would instead be legislated by parliament

Under the Dutton model, local and regional voices would have their remit narrowly targeted via legislation to focus solely on practical, community-based measures to improve outcomes for Indigenous Australians rather than giving a national body free rein to make representations on any issue ­affecting Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders. The local bodies would report federally rather than to state governments, but the model could be adjusted as needed over time by the federal parliament. It would sit outside the Constitution.

The local bodies would report federally rather than to state governments, but the model could be adjusted as needed over time by the federal parliament. It would sit outside the Constitution.

“The Liberal Party model will limit the local and regional bodies to issues specific to improving lives and outcomes locally. It has no business in defence, RBA ­deliberations, energy and environment policy,” Mr Dutton told The Weekend Australian. “It will be in legislation so it can be improved over time.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18687365

File: 663c0ff4fbf7e5f⋯.jpg (80.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser_the_Oppositi….jpg)

File: c3e68b9097eacb8⋯.jpg (137.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,South_Australian_Premier_P….jpg)

>>18687363

2/2

3. The Leeser model

There is a third model the Liberal Party’s highest-profile Yes campaigner, Julian Leeser, is prosecuting. Mr Leeser outlined a blueprint that would let parliament legislate who in the executive government the advisory body could talk to and what it could talk about, in a proposal ­radically different to that put by Anthony Albanese.

It would:

– Enshrine the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice in the Constitution.

– But remove the second clause of the government’s proposed constitutional amendment, meaning parliament would be given the power to legislate everything about the voice – including its scope.

– Mr Leeser refers to this proposal as the “minimalist constitutional model”, which he says removes the risk of High Court challenges relating to the voice.

Mr Leeser, the Opposition’s shadow Indigenous Affairs spokesman, this week quit the front bench over the Liberal Party’s stance on the voice.

He has been involved in working on the voice for a decade but resigned from shadow cabinet after being able to bring the Liberal Party round to his side.

“I respect the experiences they bring to the parliament, the communities they represent and the like and they have a different history on these issues to the history I have,” Mr Leeser said.

“No-one else in our party room has this experience,” he said. “I think I’m in a unique situation.

“I’ve also tried to keep faith with my Liberal values. My desire to conserve our institutions like the Australian Constitution with my desire to seek better outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.”

Liberal moderate Simon Birmingham has urged Anthony Albanese to embrace Mr Leeser’s model, rejected by shadow cabinet, saying it could be a “game-changer for many Australians”.

But University of NSW constitutional law expert George Wil­liams said Mr Leeser’s proposal “gutted” the government’s model and “left us with a voice that may have no voice”.

STATE-BASED MODEL

South Australia

On March 26, the South Australian parliament witnessed the historic passage of the first state-based Indigenous voice to parliament. The First Nations Voice Bill 2023 passed through both the lower and upper house unopposed.

SA’s First Nations Voice will consist of representatives from Local First Nations Voices, and will have the ability to address either house of parliament on any specific Bill that is of concern to South Australia’s First Nations People.

The SA Voice will comprise 42 elected delegates drawn from seven regions who will have a legally-enshrined right to meet with State Cabinet twice a year and have two meetings a year with the chief executive or commissioner of every government department.

It’s adoption followed two rounds of extensive consultation with Aboriginal communities, organisations, and people.

“This is an advisory body,” South Australian Attorney-General Kyam Maher said.

“It will have a right to address parliament on legislation as it goes through as it concerns Aboriginal people. But it won’t have any right to stop, any right to amend, any right to veto. It will simply have the right to have voices heard so that when governments make these decisions they are taking into account the views of Aboriginal people.

“What it doesn’t mean is that there is a new third chamber of parliament that’s going to be able to veto or change what the parliament does. That’s not what it is at all.”

The prospect for legal wrangling with Indigenous groups who feel their advice has been ignored is also reduced by the SA legislation explicitly acknowledging the non-binding nature of the feedback from Voice delegates.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/from-mini-to-maxi-the-rival-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-models-explained/news-story/ba74b4607caf0aa598b4818dc1c170bf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18687374

File: d71f9baa5f3daea⋯.jpg (157.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

Peter Dutton clashes with reporter after grim Alice Springs warning

Liberal leader Peter Dutton has unleashed on a reporter after offering a grim warning on the ongoing issues plaguing Alice Springs.

Samantha Maiden - April 13, 2023

1/2

Warning: Disturbing content

Liberal leader Peter Dutton has warned “somebody is going to get killed” in Alice Springs and unleashed on an ABC reporter during a shocking account of the violence and sexual abuse in the town.

Urging Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to “step up and step in”, the Liberal leader has warned it was time for action to protect children from endemic sexual abuse by restoring law and order.

“You’ve got kids here tonight, who are going to be sexually abused or families where domestic violence has now become a current occurrence and we are told nothing can be done about it,’’ he said.

“I just find it completely and utterly deplorable.”

Speaking in Alice Springs, CLP Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price delivered a shocking account of sexual abuse in the Northern Territory.

She said surgeons were being left to operate on children who were raped.

“They’re experiencing seeing the damage that’s been done to those children,’’ she said.

She claimed she had heard from surgeons who had spoken about operating on “babies” after being sexually abused.

“That’s what I am concerned with and I’m not concerned with ideology,” she said.

Mr Dutton is considering appointing Senator Price to the vacancy sparked by Liberal MP Julian Leeser’s resignation from the frontbench over the Voice.

Senator Price is one of the Indigenous leaders campaigning for the No vote. Mr Dutton said the time for action was now.

The Liberal leader said the community was at breaking point and there was a real risk that someone would die.

“The video of kids running rampant in, you know, the local CBD, somebody’s going to be killed here,’’ he said.

“And somebody was killed here in 2021. Somebody obviously has lost their life, tragically, equally tragic in Darwin. But we’re going to see further tragedy here.”

Dutton clashes with ABC reporter

Mr Dutton unleashed on one reporter after he asked about a local Indigenous group that questioned whether or not sex abuse was rampant.

“I mean with respect, that is such an ABC question. Do you live locally?,’’ Mr Dutton said.

“I mean, do you speak to people on the street? Do you hear what it is they’re saying to you?”

The reporter said he did live locally, with Mr Dutton responding: “You live locally and you don’t believe there’s any problem here?”.

ABC then ended the press conference.

“OK, we’ve got to leave that there because we’re going to our break,’’ the ABC host told viewers.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18687375

File: 1fe0d51e36e4a0b⋯.jpg (76.92 KB,1024x768,4:3,Mr_Dutton_unleashed_on_an_….jpg)

File: cdfef746be8f51d⋯.jpg (477.39 KB,1032x668,258:167,Where_to_find_help_2023.jpg)

>>18687374

2/2

Earlier, Mr Dutton said people were barricading themselves in their homes at night.

“You can’t have a situation where people have fear and a lot of people have spoken to us about this sort of self imposed curfew where they get home and lock themselves in their homes,’’ he said.

“And that is a terrible situation and it wouldn’t be tolerated in any other part of the country. Certainly not in any capital city.

“We’re speaking to a business owner this morning who gave the unbelievable account of the fact that in his block in the building where his businesses were in January of this year, they were broken into on 18 separate occasions.

“I mean, think about that, where in Brisbane or Sydney or Hobart or Perth would that be tolerated? There would be public outrage and somehow we’re treating Territorians as second class citizens. Under this government, it has to stop. You need to restore law and order, that’s the first thing.”

Alice Springs mayor Matt Paterson has told Sky News that the violence was back.

“On the weekend we’ve seen cars again driving erratically, stolen vehicles with kids in the back, kids hanging out windows,” he said.

“Police again told people to avoid our CBD early in the morning because they couldn’t control the kids.

“The old timer’s village got broken into twice in two days. It’s just the same old stuff. These kids are stealing cars and then ram-raiding other cars on the road.”

Mr Paterson echoed Mr Dutton’s call yesterday for AFP assistance in the region.

“I put out the call for the AFP in January … we need more boots on the ground here,” he said.

“There was a police operation in November where there was a visual presence of police and there was an automatic feeling of safety, of perception of safety.”

Mr Paterson also pointed out the “irony” that territory votes do not count to the second hurdle of a referendum – that at least four of six states must vote in favour as well as a majority of the whole country’s population.

“The irony for me around the voice … is we are a territory. So effectively we get one vote in a referendum where states get two votes. To me, we still only half count in a referendum.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/peter-dutton-clashes-with-reporter-after-grim-alice-springs-warning/news-story/2a38f0db33b5fc3a991732b1955433a2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18687384

File: f301b9888283711⋯.jpg (114.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_has_been_….jpg)

>>18670782

Pressure on Anthony Albanese to attend NATO summit

BEN PACKHAM - APRIL 12, 2023

Anthony Albanese is under pressure to attend the upcoming NATO summit in Lithuania amid signs of European reluctance to take a firm stand against China’s growing assertiveness and disregard for international norms.

The government is hedging on whether the Prime Minister will be present at the alliance’s July 11-12 summit in Vilnius, which he has been invited to attend along with his Japanese, South ­Korean and New Zealand counterparts.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong equivocated on Wednesday when asked whether Mr Albanese, who is on leave, would attend the summit. “Obviously, it will be a matter for the Prime Minister whether … he can attend,” she said.

Her comments came as French President Emmanuel Macron returned from a trip to China, saying Europe should not follow the US into a conflict with Beijing over Taiwan. “The question we need to answer, as Europeans, is the following: is it in our interest to accelerate (a crisis) on Taiwan? No,” he told French newspaper Les Echos and Politico Europe.

“The worst thing would be to think we Europeans must become followers on this topic and take our cue from the US agenda and a ­Chinese over-reaction.”

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham said Mr Albanese should be at the summit “to demonstrate Australia’s 100 per cent commitment to the rules-based order, our democratic partners, and the defence of Ukraine”.

He said NATO had shown it wanted to strengthen ties with the “Asia-Pacific Four”, and it was “unquestionably in Australia’s interests” to reciprocate the alliance’s outreach. The passing of the 12-month anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine ensured it was “no time to be a no-show”.

Australia has fallen from its past position as the largest non-NATO donor to Ukraine’s war effort, with the under-siege country now pleading for the Albanese government to provide advanced Hawkei protected vehicles to the country’s defending forces.

Senator Wong said great powers should not be allowed to dominate smaller ones, and the government would consider all Ukrainian requests for support but she cautioned: “The point about Ukraine … is it is a long way away.”

The Prime Minister’s office did not respond when asked whether Mr Albanese planned to travel to Vilnius for the summit.

Lithuania’s top national security adviser, Kestutis Budrys, revealed the NATO invitation to The Australian days after talks in Brussels between NATO officials and AP4 representatives.

NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said after the meeting that any decision by China to provide ­lethal aid for Russia in its war against Ukraine would be “a ­historic mistake with profound implications”.

There are fears, compounded by the Macron visit to Beijing, that the EU underestimates the threat posed by Beijing to the global rules-based order.

Strategic Analysis Australia director Peter Jennings said Mr Macron’s visit demonstrated the need for a “coalition” approach to standing up to authoritarian ­regimes.

“When Macron goes to China and says, ‘Oh, well, we don't have to follow the Americans’,” he said. “I think there’s a weakness there; that there’s a temptation for countries to … split apart and do their own thing,” he said.

“(We need to) stay strong and stick together. Security is indivisible. That’s true in Europe but it’s also true in the Indo Pacific.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pressure-on-anthony-albanese-to-attend-nato-summit/news-story/9ff0cdb925e7dfcc90f27aa3eeabef2f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18687407

File: 0adc2bc6e2caef9⋯.mp4 (15.9 MB,640x360,16:9,Premier_Daniel_Andrews_on_….mp4)

‘The worst of American politics’: Premier backs drag performers after cafe threats

Rachael Dexter - April 13, 2023

1/2

The Victorian premier says the targeting of drag events is the worst of American politics creeping into the state after a Melbourne cafe cancelled a children’s craft and games event hosted by drag queens.

It comes as the founder of the community group where threats of “staking out” the cafe and tracking down performers distanced himself from the comments, labelling them “a major concern”.

Police visited Alice Rebel’s Cafe and Bar in Chelsea in Melbourne’s south-east on Thursday morning after messages emerged on encrypted chat app Telegram.

The Age obtained screenshots of messages between those who objected to the event suggesting they could track down the drag performers at their homes by using their licence plate numbers and paying a contact inside VicRoads for home addresses. The Age is unable to verify the legitimacy of the poster’s claims.

Cafe owner Meg Anderson cancelled the “Colour me Egg-cited” Easter event where parents could have brought their children to a craft and games workshop led by two drag queen performers.

After the event was advertised, she received a deluge of messages and calls she described as bigoted.

On Wednesday, the day the event had originally been scheduled, she contacted police fearing for her staff and patrons’ safety after being alerted to the threatening messages from individuals who mistakenly believed the event was still going ahead.

The messages appeared on Tuesday night in a chat forum for ‘My Place Australia’, which is a growing network of fringe social media groups that have protested against local councils over 5G and 15-minute city conspiracy theories. The groups aim to set up “parallel communities” – shadow local governments and alternative institutions to avoid mainstream society.

My Place founder Darren Bergwerf said he had “major concerns” about the messages and described the incident as “infiltration of our communities”.

“I’ve just blocked that person this morning and blocked and removed two people yesterday when I was made aware of who they were,” he said.

Premier Daniel Andrews offered support to the cafe and the drag performers, saying “equality is not negotiable in this state”.

“I think it’s pretty sad day when the worst of American politics is creeping into our state. And there’s no place for that,” he said.

“Trying to disrupt events that are peaceful, lawful. They’re not compulsory, if you don’t want to go don’t go.

“We see this sort of stuff in Florida and all sorts of other places. We don’t need that here, we just don’t. We are a harmonious, respectful, inclusive place where being different [is] not a bad thing.

“It’s what makes us such a vibrant, interesting, thoughtful place, and it shouldn’t be too much to ask to simply expect that you’d be treated fairly and equally. That’s the way it should be.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18687411

File: 71c6dca489adaa4⋯.jpg (152.88 KB,1024x683,1024:683,A_screenshot_of_one_of_the….jpg)

File: 68e784804ca8f4c⋯.jpg (3.97 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Meg_Anderson_at_Rebel_Cafe.jpg)

>>18687407

2/2

Andrews defended the integrity of VicRoads’ database after the agency committed to investigate the matter via the Department of Transport and Planning integrity unit.

“I’d be very concerned to think that anybody could pay for the personal information of anyone, anyone else, that’s simply wrong,” Andrews said.

“My advice is that there are very robust systems and regular audits … that would find any such breach within the VicRoads system.

“It is appropriate that VicRoads have a closer look at this and make sure that the highest standards are being observed.”

The premier lambasted the opposition, accusing the Victorian Liberals of contributing to a climate of “nastiness” around LGBTQI issues, pointing directly to Liberal MP Moira Deeming’s appearance at an anti-trans rally at Parliament last month which was gatecrashed by neo-Nazis.

Opposition Leader John Pesutto said he wasn’t going to dignify the premier’s remarks with a response.

However, he did say it was disturbing that the cafe owner felt unsafe enough to cancel the event.

“This cafe should have been able to conduct its activities,” Pesutto said. “I hope that in due course it’s able to proceed. We live in a democracy and people should be free … to engage in the activities they wish to.”

Phillip Pease, the Liberal candidate for Mordialloc (which takes in the suburb of Chelsea) at the November state election, also publicly backed Alice Rebel cafe on Thursday and urged its owner to hold a similar event in the future.

“I just wanted to jump on and offer my support for Megan and her drag queens at Alice’s bar,” Pease said, calling into the talkback line on ABC Radio’s Melbourne Mornings program.

“I just wanted to say thank you for all the work they do and for actually standing up for minorities.

“I would just implore her to go and reconsider running that event again because I’m sure the community would back them 100 per cent”.

A Victoria Police spokeswoman said they were aware of the cancelled event at the cafe and that the decision was made by the owner. “Police regularly run proactive patrols to deter any anti-social behaviour,” she said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/the-worst-of-american-politics-premier-backs-drag-performers-after-cafe-threats-20230413-p5d03x.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18693432

File: 329c18d853ad3d4⋯.jpg (85.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_has_made_asse….jpg)

>>18687374

‘Heads in sand’: Labor lashed over NT child sex abuse claims

NOAH YIM - APRIL 14, 2023

The Coalition has dug in behind Peter Dutton’s assertion of widespread child sexual violence in central Australia, with Liberal senator Simon Birmingham and opposition deputy leader Sussan Ley calling on the federal government to stop playing politics and take action.

Senator Birmingham on Friday criticised the government’s “shameful” reaction to Mr Dutton’s claims and called on Anthony Albanese to show “leadership” over the issue.

A political storm erupted on Thursday during Mr Dutton’s visit to Alice Springs, as the ABC came under fire for abruptly ending the live broadcast of a fiery ­exchange between the ­Opposition Leader and an ABC journalist over the claims.

NT Police Minister Kate Worden attacked Mr Dutton for ­“absolutely opportunistic political game-­playing” in alleging widespread child sexual abuse in the territory.

“It’s quite frankly a dog act,” Ms Worden said, calling on Mr Dutton to report any evidence he had to police.

Labor senator for the NT, ­Malarndirri McCarthy, also called for the allegations to be referred to police. “I would ask Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, if you are aware of this, then you need to mandatorily report it to police so that there can be an investigation immediately, and if you have not done that, I would urge you to do so as soon as possible,” she said.

Senator Birmingham told Sky News the “shameful” reaction of the Labor Party suggested

they “somehow had their heads buried in the sand when it comes to this far too tragic issue.”

“People can focus on the issue, which is the extent to which there is sexual abuse, assault, violence – the type of activities in Indigenous communities across the Northern Territory that have been going on for far too long … are driven by a range of different abuses of alcohol, of drugs, of gambling, of different gambling technologies … but these are a known scourge and shame on our nation,” he said.

Ms Ley said she “could not fathom” why the Northern Territory and federal governments had not taken “more urgent” action over the “national tragedy” in the NT.

“Instead of demonstrating leadership, we are seeing political accusations levelled at Peter Dutton that are quite frankly, disgusting,” she told reporters.

“To accuse Peter Dutton of playing politics with children is so offensive and wrong.

“Peter Dutton started his working life out as a cop. It was his job to go into broken and dangerous homes and save children. That is what he did, day in, day out he was there to protect kids who had no one to protect them.

So to accuse Peter Dutton of playing politics with children is offensive and it is wrong.

To see the NT Government seek to attack him for going to Alice Springs and listening to local communities is ridiculous.”

Ms Ley said her “great fear” was that, given the increase in alcohol fuelled violence in Alice Springs, the numbers could “very well be a floor and not a ceiling”.

“The devastation being wrought on children in Alice Springs and across the Northern Territory demands action. Because this is not about politics, it is about leadership,” she said.

“There is a national tragedy unfolding in Alice Springs with women and children at risk of violence and sexual assault and there’s a crisis spiralling in aged care across this nation and the Prime Minister needs to get off the beach and back to work.

“It can’t be right that Australia’s national leader is kicking back on holidays while some of Australia’s most vulnerable are being kicked out of their homes”.

Senator Birmingham called on Labor to “put the politics aside”.

“I’m not pretending this is an overnight problem that’s only arisen under the Albanese government,” he said. “Yes it got worse when the alcohol restrictions were lifted … but this is an enduring problem. And indeed, it’s an intergenerational problem.”

“(The Prime Minister) ought to show far more leadership on these issues than has been the case. Yes he visited Alice Springs but all too briefly.”

Senator Birmingham also said his position against the Indigenous voice to parliament – which appears less bullish than some of his colleagues – has not come up as a concern in conversations with the Opposition Leader.

“No concerns have been raised with me about expectations that somehow I’m out there addressing rallies,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/heads-in-sand-labor-lashed-over-nt-child-sex-abuse-claims/news-story/d14ec062381a6a27e2b7e16df7b90f53

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18693450

File: 29ef6b8f4f3431c⋯.jpg (1.9 MB,4000x2668,1000:667,Eddie_Betts_said_he_had_ca….jpg)

>>18600210 (pb)

>>18676743

AFL great Eddie Betts backs the Voice: ‘It’s a small step, but the right step’

Jack Latimore - April 13, 2023

AFL great Eddie Betts has thrown his support behind an Indigenous Voice to parliament, describing the proposal as a pathway to inclusion and respect in decision-making.

The former Carlton and Adelaide Crows small forward and three-time All Australian said he had canvassed a range of views from within First Nations communities before coming to the decision.

“It’s a small step, but I think the right step, to have a Voice and be heard,” he told The Age on Thursday.

“I’ve taken my time over the past 12 months, to speak to Elders, community members and people I trust to get more information about the Voice. I’ve listened to a range of opinions and worked hard to understand exactly what the Voice is and how it impacts Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

“I know the Voice is not an immediate solution to the many barriers we as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people face, but I feel like it’s the opening of a pathway to make sure we’re included and respected in decision-making on issues that affect us.”

Betts said it was important that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were given the time and space to learn about the Voice proposal and urged other First Nations people “to have yarns about the Voice with mob they trust”.

“Lots of mob distrust the government and building trust takes time,” he said.

Betts is viewed as an influential figure within the AFL’s Indigenous player cohort and his support is expected to lead to more First Nations players stepping forward to back the Voice.

His decision to publicly endorse the Voice comes a week after federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton announced the Liberal Party would oppose it in a referendum and that he would actively campaign for the No vote.

Dutton’s announcement last week prompted the resignation of shadow attorney-general and Indigenous affairs spokesman Julian Leeser, who said he would campaign in favour of the referendum on the Voice. It also led to former Coalition Indigenous affairs minister Ken Wyatt quitting the Liberal Party in protest.

The latest polling from Resolve Political Monitor showed 57 per cent support nationally for an Indigenous Voice.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese this week said he expected sporting figures would speak out in support of an Indigenous Voice.

The AFL and NRL are preparing to launch co-ordinated Yes campaigns supporting the Voice after legislation to hold the referendum has passed through the federal parliament.

The two dominant football codes will head up a united campaign that will include Netball Australia, Football Australia, Cricket Australia, Tennis Australia and Rugby Australia.

Last month, AFL Players Association president and Geelong captain Patrick Dangerfield was vocal in his support of the Indigenous Voice and backed the AFL’s plans to come out strongly in support of the Yes campaign.

“We must continue to find ways to shine a light on marginalised sections of the community,” Dangerfield said at the time.

“As a code and a club and as a league, we have still got areas that we can improve vastly around all levels of support that we provide, but I think this [a Voice to parliament] is certainly a step in the right direction.”

Dangerfield played alongside Betts at the Adelaide Crows and the pair worked together at Geelong, where Betts held a development coaching role.

The Collingwood Football Club Board issued a statement in late March announcing it supported a First Nations Voice to parliament, but said the club had made clear to players, staff, members and supporters that they had an individual democratic right to vote however they wish.

The NRL announced its commitment to the Voice in a recent statement, saying: “The NRL listens to communities we’re a part of. When we do, we know that we’re closer and more connected and better able to serve those communities.”

The Australian Rugby League’s Indigenous Council was contacted for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/afl-great-eddie-betts-backs-the-voice-it-s-a-small-step-but-the-right-step-20230413-p5d072.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18693485

File: d54d23edc54a174⋯.jpg (200.14 KB,1776x1184,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 4d062622946f2bd⋯.jpg (1.38 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Justin_Trudeau_praised_Ant….jpg)

File: a0e2821a1f83021⋯.jpg (836.31 KB,1098x2580,183:430,THE_100_MOST_INFLUENTIAL_P….jpg)

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese named in Time's 100 most influential people list

abc.net.au - 14 April 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been included in Time magazine's list of the 100 most influential people of 2023, alongside King Charles III, Ukraine's First Lady, Olena Zelenska, and model Bella Hadid.

Mr Albanese joins former prime ministers Kevin Rudd and John Howard as the only other Australian leaders to have made the list, while Julia Gillard was shortlisted in 2013.

The annual list — which first appeared in 1999 — compiles leaders, innovators, humanitarians and those in arts and entertainment who had an impact on the world, either in a positive or negative light.

Time's final 100 are picked by its editors from a larger pool of nominations chosen by previous entrants on the list and the US news magazine's international writing staff.

Mr Albanese, a career politician, led the Labor Party to victory in the May 2022 federal election, becoming Australia's 31st prime minister.

Since then, he has sought to lead the country out of the coronavirus pandemic during fractious economic times and spearheaded the push for the Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

Other political figures to make the 2023 list were US President Joe Biden, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Cindy McCain, the wife of late US senator John McCain.

Also on the list was Evan Gershkovich, the Wall Street Journal reporter who was arrested and charged with espionage in Russia earlier this month.

'A symbol of hope and inspiration'

Each entry on the Time 100 list is accompanied with a foreword by a contemporary, with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau penning a glowing tribute for Mr Albanese, describing him as "a symbol of hope and inspiration":

"He works to lift up and amplify the voices of those who need to be heard from, particularly Indigenous peoples," Mr Trudeau wrote.

"His government supports those who need it most, believes that we need to take ambitious climate action, and unwaveringly supports democracy in the face of unprecedented threat.

"In a world where people are increasingly uncertain about what the future holds for them and their families, it's easy for politicians to sow fear and division.

"To choose the path of hope and opportunity takes immense courage, and that courage lives within Anthony Albanese."

Mr Trudeau — himself the son of a former Canadian prime minister — also wrote about Mr Albanese's humble origins.

"Progressives around the world are united in the idea that we should leave no one behind," he wrote.

"The idea that no matter who you are or where you come from, you should have every chance to succeed in life.

"Few politicians embody that journey as Anthony Albanese does."

Mr Rudd made the fifth annual Time 100 list in 2008, with Academy Award-winning actor Cate Blanchett praising him for the apology to the Stolen Generation and for ratifying the Kyoto Protocol climate change treaty.

A year later, Mr Rudd was also shortlisted.

On the other hand, Mr Howard was on the Time 100 list for 2005, with the late newspaper editor Frank Devine drawing comparisons between the then-PM and the post-war US president, Harry S Truman.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-14/anthony-albanese-named-in-time-s-100-most-influential-people-lis/102225650

https://time.com/collection/100-most-influential-people-2023/6269839/anthony-albanese/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18693513

File: 3d76b35133a90b0⋯.jpg (100.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_self_styled_Islamic….jpg)

File: 1c53244046fd0bd⋯.jpg (131.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,Blake_Pender_s_continued_d….jpg)

Ringleader of the ‘tinnie terrorists’ Robert Musa Cerantonio to be freed from jail in May

ELLEN WHINNETT - APRIL 13, 2023

1/2

The leader of the so-called “tinnie terrorists”, self-styled preacher Robert Musa Cerantonio, will be back on the streets in May after completing a seven-year jail term for planning to overthrow The Philippines government.

He is one of seven high-risk terrorist offenders due for release into the community this year, as the government and police prepare to abandon the continued detention orders that have allowed authorities to jail dangerous ­people beyond the end of their prison terms.

Future high-risk terrorism offenders released into the community look set to be monitored under extended supervision orders, new powers introduced in 2021 that allow even tighter surveillance and monitoring than the CDOs in place since 2005.

The expected widespread use of extended supervision orders heralds a new era in the management of Australia’s cohort of terrorism offenders who have completed their jail terms but may still pose risks to the community.

The supervision orders will allow police to control and monitor the movements, associations and communications of offenders 24 hours a day, ban them from contacting certain people, accessing prohibited material or using specific social media or encrypted communications.

It will likely provide a heavy burden on federal and state police and ASIO resources, with dozens of police sometimes required to monitor one high-risk offender.

Cerantonio, 38, will be set free in Melbourne on May 9 after completing his sentence for preparing for an incursion into a foreign country for the purpose of engaging in hostile activities.

He will be the first high-risk terrorism offender released since the report in March by the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor, Grant Donaldson SC, who criticised continued detention orders as disproportionate, and urged the government to scrap them.

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus has not indicated whether he will accept Mr Donaldson’s recommendation, saying he was considering the report findings.

The Australian Federal Police seem to have moved away from seeking CDOs, and is expected to apply for extended supervision orders for two high-profile offenders due for release shortly: Blake Pender, in NSW, and Abdul Nacer Benbrika, in Victoria.

Pender’s case is complicated, involving terrorism convictions and other crimes of violence. He has served a one-year CDO at the conclusion of his jail term and is due for release in September.

Benbrika, the ringleader of an al-Qa’ida-inspired plot to attack Australian landmarks in the early 2000s, has served three years of a CDO beyond the end of his 15-year jail term.

Police are not expected to seek a continuation of his order but will apply for an extended supervision order in the community.

Benbrika remains in prison until December, and has several legal disputes under way, including an appeal against a government’s decision to strip his Australian citizenship.

Cerantonio led a group of men who towed a small boat from Melbourne to Cape York in May 2016, intending to sail to The Philippines with the intention of joining a push to oust the government and install sharia law.

The improbable scheme, which saw police surreptitiously follow the men as they slowly drove the boat across Australia, was doomed from the start – the boat was just 7m long and none of the men had experience at sea.

Five other men were later jailed over the plot. All have since been released.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18693517

File: 407be99c41eacc3⋯.jpg (139.33 KB,1024x769,1024:769,Abdul_Nacer_Benbrika.jpg)

File: 31825306acd559a⋯.jpg (259.34 KB,1279x1020,1279:1020,GETTING_OUT.jpg)

>>18693513

2/2

At a bail hearing for one of the group in 2016, Acting Detective-Sergeant Adam Foley told the Supreme Court in Victoria that global intelligence services considered Cerantonio the second or third most influential jihadist preacher in the world.

An Australian-Italian who converted to Islam and became a self-styled preacher and spiritual leader, Cerantonio has since claimed he has renounced his Islamic faith and extremist ideology, encouraging others to stay “away from the same mistakes’’.

He did not receive early release on parole and has served his entire sentence.

The Attorney-General’s Department declined to comment on whether it would seek either a continued detention order or an extended supervision order against Cerantonio upon completion of his jail term.

“The Attorney-General takes advice from agencies on these matters,’’ a spokesperson said.

The AFP declined to comment on what order, if any, would be sought.

“The AFP is not the applicant for offenders eligible for an extended supervision order/CDO,’’ a spokeswoman said. “The Attorney-General’s Department is the responsible agency.’’

Other high-risk terrorism offenders are set to be released in coming years as those who received mid-range sentences during the wave of Islamic State terror last decade begin to complete their sentences.

Sydney man Nowroz Amin, who tried to travel to Bangladesh to engage in violent extremism, is due for release in October after serving five years and four months after being convicted of preparing for, or planning, a terrorist act.

Another Sydney man, Youssef Uweinat, is due for release in Nov­ember after being jailed for three years and 11 months for being a member of Islamic State.

A third man, Ibrahim Ghazzawy, who helped plan a foiled terror attack in Sydney is slated for release in December after being sentenced to eight years in jail.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/ringleader-of-the-tinnie-terrorists-robert-musa-cerantonio-to-be-freed-from-jail-in-may/news-story/53f0270cca038ebda465c9d906cf0c25

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18693611

File: d2ba2c3ddb6461e⋯.mp4 (10 MB,640x360,16:9,AFP_Bondi_arrest.mp4)

NSW man charged with selling Australian defence secrets to two foreign spies

ELLEN WHINNETT - APRIL 14, 2023

1/2

A man has been charged with selling Australian defence, economic and national security secrets to two foreign spies working for the People’s Republic of China.

Alexander Csergo, 55, was arrested by Australian Federal Police at Bondi in Sydney’s eastern suburbs late on Friday and charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, a charge that carries a 15-year jail term.

He is only the second person in Australia to face a foreign interference charge since legislation targeting alleged foreign interference was introduced in 2018.

Mr Csergo, an Australian citizen who lives and runs a business in China, was arrested after he returned to Australia from abroad.

The arrest came as part of a Counter Terrorism Taskforce Investigation instigated by Australia’s domestic intelligence agency, ASIO.

The AFP alleged Mr Csergo had been approached via social media by an unnamed individual who claimed to be from a think tank. The approach is alleged to have happened offshore when Mr Csergo was allegedly invited to meet the unnamed individual’s representatives.

Police further allege that he then met with two spies, who used the anglicised names Ken and ­Evelyn.

“The AFP will allege the two work for a foreign intelligence service and are undertaking intelligence collection activities,’’ police said in a statement.

Although the AFP refused to name the country involved, ASIO and the Five Eyes partners have been warning about persistent and sophisticated attempts by the People’s Republic of China to access details of Western countries’ defence and national security capabilities.

Mr Csergo will appear in court in Parramatta on Saturday.

He is believed to work as the president of global innovation and transformation at a company called Conversys, a digital solutions company headquartered in Shanghai, China.

The company’s website says it has previously worked with several major companies, including Australian telcos Optus and Telstra. Another social media profile under the name Alexander Csergo says he has worked for both those companies, as well as Hyatt Hotels in Australia.

The Conversys website says Mr Csergo has 30 years’ experience in data analytics. “Alex began his career in the telecommunications infrastructure industry; by 25 he started his first VC-backed company,’’ it says.

“He began his career in China in 2002.’’

The website says Mr Csergo has worked for major companies including Daimler, BMW, Jaguar Land Rover, Audi and Volks­wagen Group China in telecommunications infrastructure, and had won 40 international awards for his work.

Media reports in 2014 note that a man named Alexander Csergo had been hired by luxury cosmetics firm Estee Lauder to improve their market presence in China.

The AFP alleged Ken and ­Evelyn offered Mr Csergo money “to obtain information about Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements, plus matters relating to other countries’’.

“It is alleged the Australian man compiled a number of reports for the individuals and received payment for those reports,’’ the AFP said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18693626

File: 5a3e52fb08682af⋯.jpg (90.83 KB,1280x720,16:9,Alexander_Csergo.jpg)

File: b612cbbe13936e1⋯.jpeg (111.03 KB,1024x576,16:9,Acting_Immigration_Minist….jpeg)

>>18693611

2/2

It said Ken and Evelyn may have tried to recruit other Australians, and urged anyone with information to come forward to law enforcement.

“The AFP believes other Australian citizens and residents may have been approached by ‘Ken’ and ‘Evelyn’ and is urging those individuals to provide information to the National Security Hotline on 1800 123 400,’’ police said. “Espionage and foreign interference pose a serious threat to Australia’s sovereignty, security and the integrity of our national institutions.

“The Counter Foreign Interference Taskforce, which includes ASIO and the AFP, is working to disrupt the threat and mitigate the harm from foreign interference and espionage.’’

AFP Assistant Commissioner Krissy Barrett said police had recently provided diaspora communities with a fact sheet urging them to call the national hotline if they believed they had been the subject of, or witness to, foreign interference.

“The AFP and their partners thank those individuals who have placed their trust in law enforcement and provided valuable information to the national security hotline. We know making those calls can be daunting but I assure you we never take for granted the support we receive from the public,’’ she said. “I want to underscore that the AFP targets criminality, not countries nor ethnicity. With our partners, the AFP is ensuring that we protect Australians, Australia’s sovereignty and our way of life.’’

The previous person charged under foreign interference legislation, Di Sanh Duong, 67, has been before the courts in Melbourne for the past three years.

Mr Duong, a Chinese community leader in Melbourne also known as Sunny Duong, is accused of preparing for an act of foreign interference, an offence that carries a maximum sentence of 10 years.

Police have alleged a donation he made to a hospital in Melbourne was designed to curry favour with former Coalition minister Alan Tudge in order that he could approach Mr Tudge and seek to influence government policy in a manner that would benefit the Chinese government.

Mr Duong has denied the charge.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nsw-man-charged-with-selling-australian-defence-secrets-to-two-foreign-spies/news-story/a1d211d0f87e8d0d362790dce192b6f4

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-media/media-releases/australian-man-charged-foreign-interference

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18696839

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

‘I’d stake my life on it’: Trump has ‘no chance’ of an election win

Sky News Australia

Apr 15, 2023

The recent arrest of Donald Trump “guarantees” the former US president a Republican nomination for president however he has “no chance” of scoring an election win in 2024, says Former Howard government minister Peter McGauran.

“He has no chance whatever,” he told Sky News Australia.

“I’d stake my life on it.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeLdjbniVuM

>These people are STUPID.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698609

File: 3018dad7bb9ebb0⋯.mp4 (15.56 MB,960x540,16:9,Children_on_the_streets_of….mp4)

>>18687374

Kids return to the streets in Alice Springs to run amok

LIAM MENDES - APRIL 15, 2023

1/2

The girl looks about 14. “I’m drunk, f_ck you,” she yells as we pass on the street.

Her mates laugh.

It’s 11.20pm on Thursday in Alice Springs, and the group of a dozen or so Indigenous children and early teens heads on towards the main drag of town.

“Yeah, we drunk,” her friend calls back. “What the f_ck for, bra,” she says as her friends continue laughing. “We’ll beat you, we’ll smash your car,” she adds as the gang cross the road.

Most of the kids are around 15, with some closer to 10 or 11. Three months on from our first reports revealing the extent of kids running wild in Alice Springs and it’s clear little has changed. Perhaps nothing.

Despite the promise of almost $300m in extra funding and new restrictions on alcohol sales, children are still on the streets late at night, on their own, playing cat and mouse with the cops – on the same day Peter Dutton flew out of town after kicking over a hornet’s nest of accusations and counter-accusations over rampant child sexual abuse.

The issue no one seemed to want to talk about was neglect.

Where are the parents?

Tonight, the gang comes across three wheelie bins that had already been upturned by another mob and started throwing shredding paper in the air like confetti. They soon get bored. As two kids saunter across the street, a car is forced to slam on its brakes to avoid hitting them. They barely notice. Neither would be older than 10.

A police paddy wagon pulls up. “Oi, are you mob going home?” an officer asks. “If I see you again in town, I’m going to drop you home.”

“I’m with my big sister,” the younger child says. Maybe.

They say they’re going to the bus. “Alright, go sit in the bus, I’m not going to see you in town,” the officer says, and drives on.

People in NT government-branded Toyota Landcruisers and not-for-profit branded minivans work hard but ineffectually to ferry kids home, using walkie-talkies to co-ordinate pickups and drop-offs.

Often, the service ends well before midnight; other times, it’s non-existent. When they do take children home, it’s often not long before the kids return.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698612

File: d365ae64cf097ee⋯.jpg (209 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_group_of_children_roams_….jpg)

File: 0d4bfb48ba92d29⋯.jpg (236.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,Young_children_roaming_the….jpg)

>>18698609

2/2

On Friday, Labor MP for Lingiari Marion Scrymgour said politicians had to stop “pointing the finger at each other”.

“I think everyone in the territory, we’ve got to work together to resolve some of these issues,” she said.

Ms Scrymgour, whose seat has the nation’s largest Indigenous population, agreed there had “been inroads” into domestic and family violence.

“I think alcohol restrictions have given some respite to staff in the hospital system and police, there has been a reduction in the levels of alcohol-fuelled violence, and the presentations into the emergency room, there’s been changes there,” she says.

But in terms of youth crime, nothing has changed, she says.

“So what are people doing? There’s got to be some accountability here,” she said.

She called on Aboriginal leadership to “step up” and become “front and centre” of the issues. “We’ve all got to stop pussyfooting around this and look at the solution going forward. We’ve got to stop wasting the money and resources. I don’t think we’ve got the policy grunt or capacity within governments to … deal with this and that’s where I think the Aboriginal leadership needs to come into this.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/kids-return-to-the-streets-in-alice-springs-to-run-amok/news-story/6f2d6c61a3fe2331e4b6409e56511efa

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698622

File: 262579dd041d573⋯.jpg (125.03 KB,1024x682,512:341,A_man_was_arrested_at_the_….jpg)

File: 24fedc68bdb7b80⋯.jpg (148.54 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Linda_Burney_and_her_staff….jpg)

>>18687374

Linda Burney just metres from fatal stabbing of woman

Anthony Galloway - April 15, 2023

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has expressed her heartfelt condolences to the family of a woman who died after being stabbed metres away from the federal cabinet minister in Darwin on Friday.

Burney and her staff were in the foyer of the Doubletree Hilton just before 6pm when the woman ran into the hotel bleeding heavily. Police allege she was stabbed directly outside the hotel on the Esplanade.

Some of Burney’s staff helped attend to the woman along with hotel staff, while the minister comforted members of the woman’s family.

The woman was taken to the Royal Darwin Hospital but died a short time later.

A man was arrested at the scene and remains in custody.

Burney said the woman “tragically died after allegedly being stabbed outside a hotel where I was staying”.

“The woman came into the hotel to seek help,” she said in a statement. “Together with staff from the hotel members of my staff provided assistance to the woman, and I comforted members of her family.

“My heartfelt condolences go out to the woman’s family and her loved ones. I want to thank the hotel staff, the Northern Territory Police and the paramedics who attended.”

With the matter now being investigated by the police, Burney said it would be inappropriate for her to provide any further comment at this stage.

Burney and her staff had been staying in the Northern Territory since Thursday.

NT Police said the woman died after being fatally stabbed by a man outside the hotel.

“Police and paramedics were called to the scene just before 6pm after receiving information that an injured woman had entered the hotel seeking help,” police said.

“A crime scene has been declared, and a section of the Esplanade remains closed while police investigate.”

Police have appealed for anyone with information to phone them on 131 444.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/linda-burney-just-metres-away-from-stabbing-that-allegedly-killed-woman-20230415-p5d0pl.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698686

File: c8fce23cf94a9db⋯.jpg (291.59 KB,825x1100,3:4,AFA2020_DC_1.jpg)

File: e3622c4be9c4f7f⋯.mp4 (3.08 MB,368x640,23:40,cPhQYgBonZHUAtB0.mp4)

File: 763e0c7fe0a81e9⋯.jpg (359.58 KB,825x1128,275:376,AFA2020_DC_2.jpg)

File: f78292264babb93⋯.mp4 (5.69 MB,720x1280,9:16,Zx_lon3tz0Ple7yv.mp4)

>>18687374

>>18698622

Wild night of violent crime in Darwin: Woman stabbed to death in CBD, man and woman stabbed at city's busiest shopping centre

A woman has died after being stabbed outside a CBD hotel in a wild night of crime in Darwin, while two others were allegedly set upon by knife-wielding attacker at Casuarina Square shopping centre.

Matt Cunningham - April 15, 2023

1/2

A woman is dead and two others were injured after a wild night of violent crime in Darwin.

Police say they were called to a hotel on The Esplanade in the Darwin CBD just before 6pm on Friday.

They say a woman had entered the hotel’s lobby seeking help after suffering stab wounds.

It’s understood Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney was staying at the hotel.

Her office has confirmed that a member of her staff performed CPR on the woman and called triple-0.

Paramedics were called and the woman was taken to Royal Darwin Hospital but died a short time later.

A man was arrested at the scene and remains in hospital.

Sky News spoke to the victim’s brother at the scene on Saturday morning.

He said his sister, from the community of Maningrida about 500km east of Darwin, had come to the city to visit her son who was in prison.

In a separate incident a man and woman were stabbed at Darwin’s biggest shopping centre.

Police said a 22-year-old woman was in custody after allegedly stabbing a man and a woman in the underground car park at the Casuarina Square shopping centre.

“Paramedics treated a 41-year-old man at the scene for injuries to his leg, and a 29-year-old woman was taken to Royal Darwin Hospital suffering non-life threatening injuries to her back,” police said in a statement.

“Additionally, Police have arrested a man after he allegedly slashed the tyres of a police vehicle.

“The man was consuming alcohol in a public place when Police approached him, and the alcohol was subsequently destroyed.

“Members continued their patrols when the man came to the police vehicle and slashed both rear tyres rendering the vehicle unusable.”

Sky News has also been sent video footage of a brawl at the shopping centre’s bus exchange earlier the same evening.

A group of men can be seen chasing a man who then appears to be hit by a passing bus.

The incidents come less than a month after 20-year-old Declan Laverty was stabbed to death while working at a Darwin bottle shop.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698697

File: 10667e185a8c4e3⋯.jpg (308.73 KB,825x1073,825:1073,AFA2020_DC_3.jpg)

File: a0b14d7556a1035⋯.mp4 (8.78 MB,544x960,17:30,61WN715Bi7cA1PYI.mp4)

>>18698686

2/2

Thousands of people were expected to attend an anti-crime rally at Parliament House on Saturday afternoon.

Opposition Leader Lia Finocchiaro has called for the Government to take immediate action to address violent crime.

“My sincerest condolences go to all who are grieving,” she said.

“While our thoughts and prayers are with their families it’s not enough.

“With each violent attack, the lives impacted grows, the family and friends of the victims, we must think of the hospitality workers who desperately tried to revive a life, the retail worker seeing stabbings in front of them, the ambulance, police and security first to the scene.

“Their lives have changed.

“The city we know and love has changed.

“The Territory we know and love has changed.

“Territorians have been crying out that if the Government doesn’t take stronger action that someone would lose their life, then Declan lost his.

“Since then Territorians have gathered en masse with a simple message ‘enough is enough’.

“But the calls of Territorians were not enough to get the Fyles Government to act so today, we wake up with another loss of life, and another two victims of knife crime at a major shopping centre.

“Territorians used to live their lives looking forward to the future, now we live our lives looking over our shoulder.”

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/wild-night-of-violent-crime-in-darwin-woman-stabbed-to-death-in-cbd-man-and-woman-stabbed-at-citys-busiest-shopping-centre/news-story/64b4699ef50595ccc16953ed206b981b

https://twitter.com/actionforalice/status/1646847952701517824

https://twitter.com/actionforalice/status/1647040780140433408

https://twitter.com/actionforalice/status/1647144049793728514

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698736

File: f6c8aa0d9a48e45⋯.jpg (99.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: c6c64bcc3161f07⋯.jpg (76.53 KB,1024x768,4:3,NT_Treasurer_Eva_Lawler.jpg)

>>18687374

Labor under pressure for minimising sexual assault cases

PAIGE TAYLOR and LIAM MENDES - APRIL 15, 2023

1/2

The Fyles Labor government is facing claims it tried to minimise and even deny alarmingly high rates of child sex abuse in the Northern Territory when its Treasurer, Eva Lawler, told a radio station: “Children have been sexually abused in Australia since, bloody, the place was probably settled”.

Ms Lawler made the remarks in a panel discussion on commercial Darwin radio on Friday about Peter Dutton’s visit this week to Alice Springs, where the withdrawal of alcohol restrictions last July caused havoc.

The reintroduction of some ­restrictions in January coincided with an immediate fall in overall crime and hospital admissions, but the Opposition Leader claims lawlessness has returned and there were children being regularly sexually abused.

He told the distressing story of a frontline worker taking a six-year-old back to the house where the child had been sexually abused while the child was “grabbing on to their legs, screaming not to be left there”.

Ms Lawler claimed Mr Dutton had used Alice Springs – and the issue of child sexual abuse – to ­deflect from the fact that the Liberal Party was in disarray over the Indigenous voice. The panel discussed the latest data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare showing child protection notifications in the NT were five times the national average, before a fellow panellist pointed to the 2018 rape of a two-year-old in Tennant Creek, saying it was later revealed that child protection ­notifications made that assault “a forseeable risk”.

Ms Lawler then said: “That’s right. But, you know, children have been sexually abused in Australia. Let’s you know, we can talk about the Catholic Church. Children have been sexually abused in Australia since bloody, the place was probably settled.”

On Friday night, Ms Lawler’s office issued a statement about her child sex abuse remark on radio.

“This is an issue that impacts every community around the world, not just the Territory and it’s not just something that developed overnight,” she said.

“It is incredibly frustrating when southern politicians who have never cared about the Territory fly in, throw around these criticisms and fly out.

“As a government, the care and protection of children is our absolute priority.

“If only Peter Dutton cared about Alice Springs when he was in power”.

The number of Indigenous children removed from their families and placed by case workers in out-of-home care is considered an important measure of child abuse. In Central Australia – which takes in Alice Springs – the number of Indigenous children in care has fallen over the past nine months. Data from the child welfare ­department, Territory Families, shows 143 Indigenous children were in care in Central Australia in July and August last year and climbed to 155 in November. After alcohol restrictions were reintroduced in January, the number of kids in care in the region fell to 136, to 129 in February and in March the figure was 131.

By contrast, the number of non-Indigenous children in care in Central Australia has increased from seven in July to 13 last month.

Those figures are useful only as an indicator of abuse – including neglect – that has been reported and substantiated. However this week Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, the Country Liberal Party senator from Alice Springs, suggested ­official data was not a good indication of child abuse because Territory Families was not removing enough Indigenous children from their families.

She told The Weekend Australian she believed there were “high levels” of unreported abuse.

“People are scared to report or ashamed,” Senator Price said. “I had a cousin in my family who ­refused to get her daughter checked because she felt embarrassed.

“I’ve made reports in situations where I believe nothing has been done because I believe in the rights of our children to be protected.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698737

File: 9e7a1ad6ba270b7⋯.jpg (78.72 KB,768x1023,256:341,MP_for_Lingiari_Marion_Scr….jpg)

File: 111dfe34fb5a521⋯.jpg (65.66 KB,768x1025,768:1025,NT_Police_Minister_Kate_Wo….jpg)

>>18698736

2/2

On Friday the Labor MP for Lingiari, Marion Scrymgour, slammed NT Police Minister Kate Worden – who had called Mr Dutton’s remarks on child sex abuse a “dog act” – and Territory Families.

Ms Scrymgour, who represents the seat holding the nation’s largest Indigenous population, told ABC Alice Springs on Friday: “Kate Worden and her department need to do their work.

“I think that there is a clear, a clear level of people not taking ­responsibility for dealing with these young people on the street.

“For goodness sake, 50 to 100 kids (out on the street late at night), that’s what I was told by the department and I cannot for the life of me work out why we can’t deal with those 50 to 100.

“I think Kate Worden needs to look at her department and herself, to look at the (legislative) act and to deal with this issue, and to deal with it now because there are way too many young people doing illegal things around Alice Springs and stealing cars and setting them on fire.

“The business community, everyone is sick of it now. I think we’ve got to break the neck of this and we’ve got to deal with it in an open (and) honest way.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/labor-under-pressure-for-minimising-sexual-assault-cases/news-story/fc227a714a6793eb7bba1fef814476ec

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698752

File: cb830b467fca2a3⋯.jpg (132.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine_an….jpg)

>>18676743

Real voices in referendum debate gagged by grand gesture to absolve white guilt

NYUNGGAI WARREN MUNDINE - APRIL 15, 2023

1/2

In the lead-up to this year’s Indigenous voice to parliament referendum, you’ll hear repeatedly that Aboriginal people overwhelmingly want the voice.

I don’t believe it. I meet a lot of Aboriginal people from all over the country and I always ask them what they think of the voice. Without fail, the response I hear is they oppose it, don’t understand it, or think it will just cement the monopoly of a small minority who already advise government.

Those who claim Aboriginal people want the voice point to consultations leading up to the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart and the 2021 Indigenous Voice Co-design Process Report to the Australian government by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton. Both consultation processes were flawed.

The Uluru statement was endorsed at a convention attended by just 250 delegates selected from 14 community “Dialogues”. These were capped at 100 attendees with only 60 per cent of places allocated to Indigenous people. Attendance was by invitation only, which, according to the Referendum Council, was to ensure each dialogue reached a consensus. In politics the word for that is stacked. Despite being hand-picked, several delegates rejected the Uluru statement and walked out of the convention.

Consultation for the report was also flawed. It wasn’t real consultation at all because it was based on an imposed assumption the voice is the only solution to address issues in Indigenous communities (without ever articulating what these issues are). It informed people of the voice as a fait accompli and they had little opportunity to suggest alternatives.

The co-design group interacted with about 9400 people over four months, of which only 5400 actually met with them. We’ve no idea how many were Indigenous. But even if all were, that’s a little over 1 per cent of the adult Indigenous population. In research practice a good sample is more like 10 per cent, less for very large numbers, but never as low as that.

Astonishingly, about 90 per cent of submissions to the co-design group and 80 per cent of surveys came from non-Indigenous Australians. In these submissions, support for a voice was especially strong. This raises the question – are we seeking to improve Aboriginal lives or absolve white guilt with grand gestures?

The report itself admits community consultation sessions found some participants weren’t supportive of a national voice because it would centralise power away from local communities or the breadth of issues would be too diverse for a single national body. These are very astute observations of how the voice will cut across existing communication channels between Aboriginal people and government and create deep structural problems. The report’s response to such concerns is a meaningless word salad, referring to “an expectation that members of a national voice would consider how essential policy matters affected all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people at the national level as well as linking into local and regional voices”. Good grief.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698756

File: 8498626f652ef22⋯.jpg (75.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_leader_Warren_M….jpg)

>>18698752

2/2

The consultation process gave no meaningful opportunities for feedback on the voice itself. Some Aboriginal organisations made subsequent submissions covering broader concerns they couldn’t raise in consultation. These concerns are very telling. They don’t suggest overwhelming support and uniform consensus at all. But they do contain repeated warnings from local traditional owner groups of the difficulties of being incorporated with other groups at the “local and regional” level when they aren’t the same people.

The Central Land Council’s submission referred to a lack of full transparency and accountability in the consultation process, calling for an independent observer to assess whether it was fair, open, and transparent and providing full and equitable opportunities to participate, be heard and listened to.

The Ngaanyatjarra Council is the principal representative body for traditional owners in an area the size of the UK in the tri-state region of South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Its submission indicates it wants direct communication with the four governments it needs to deal with, not bundled with other non-representative organisations that have emerged in its community. It is concerned the proposed model of 25 to 35 Indigenous groups may in fact silence the voices of the Ngaanyatjara people.

The La Perouse Aboriginal Community Alliance is a network of local service providers collaborating in engagement with governments in the La Perouse Aboriginal Land Council, an area now recognised as a discrete Aboriginal community with unbroken links to early Sydney.

Its submission also voices concern about local and regional “voices” including Aboriginal people who’ve migrated from other areas. It warns a failure to set clear boundaries on who can speak for country will create further friction between local service delivery organisations and traditional owners, benefiting none. Aboriginal people aren’t the same. No Aboriginal person can easily speak for another country or other people, only their own.

Years ago, I told early proponents of the voice that a national representative voice made no sense because any representative model needed to be drawn from the traditional owner groups. This idea was bastardised into a “local and regional voice” model that means nothing to anyone.

The Ngaanyatjarra Council’s submis­sion put it bluntly: there’s “a real risk that distilling voices from 500 Indigenous clans into a collection of regional groups would effectively nullify authentic Indigenous voices, rendering them meaningless, allowing governments to claim that they have ‘consulted’ Indigenous people”.

The entire concept of the voice is based on a false assumption of the homogeneity of Aboriginal people across the nation, as one race. This is something Indigenous Australians have tried to counter for decades. Now we find a government striving to entrench this in the Constitution. It won’t end well.

Nyunggai Warren Mundine is director, Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies, and president of Recognise a Better Way. Acknowledgments to academic, historian and Warraimaay woman Vicki Grieves Williams for her research and contribution to this series of articles.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/real-voices-gagged-by-grand-gesture-to-absolve-white-guilt/news-story/85ddf8ebd8fce2c2212e344c980462d6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698843

File: 1bb0e230f7875fe⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,3936x2624,3:2,Navy_chief_Mark_Hammond_sp….jpg)

File: 116726d053f351e⋯.jpg (4.43 MB,6555x4375,1311:875,The_Virginia_class_nuclear….jpg)

>>18670474

Ignore the AUKUS hand-wringers, we need these subs for sea-bed battles: Navy chief

Matthew Knott - April 15, 2023

1/2

The nation’s navy chief has urged Australians to ignore “hand-wringing” doubters of the AUKUS pact, arguing a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines is necessary to fortify Australia against a potential attack on vital undersea cables.

In his first interview since Prime Minister Anthony Albanese unveiled the details of the submarine plan last month, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond forcefully rejected claims the vessels could draw Australia into a war over Taiwan or that technological advances will render them obsolete before they arrive.

Rather than focus on the submarine program’s possible pitfalls or imposing price tag – between $268 billion and $368 billion over three decades, according to the government – Hammond implored Australians to see it as a nation-building endeavour on par with the original creation of the Snowy Mountains Hydro-electric scheme.

Given Australia is a “three-ocean trading nation”, he said it was vital to remember that “we derive our economic wellbeing, and therefore our economic prosperity and national security from the maritime domain”.

“As the historian T. B. Millar said last century: you don’t need to invade Australia to defeat Australia,” Hammond said in an interview at his office at Defence headquarters in Canberra.

“We are vulnerable to the interruption and disruption of sea lines of communication and seabed infrastructure, and we’ve seen both of those play out in the Ukraine conflict.

“That should bring it home to all of us that in the current deteriorating strategic environment, we need to take appropriate measures to mitigate against risks in the maritime domain in particular.”

Australia is connected by at least a dozen undersea internet cables, many of which land in Sydney and Perth.

Having spent much of his naval career as a submariner, including extended periods aboard both nuclear-powered and conventional diesel vessels, Hammond said he had “lived and breathed” submarines for most of his adult life.

“The net sum of my experience and analysis of the contemporary and future operating environment leads me to the conclusion that only the nuclear-powered submarine capability of the type we’re about to invest in is the appropriate investment for this nation going forward,” Hammond said.

Hammond, who was appointed head of the navy last June, said submarines served a broader purpose than simply defending the Australian coastline from possible invasion, a scenario emphasised by former prime minister Paul Keating in his criticisms of the plan.

“Our maritime domain is significant; we’re not parked at the edge of an international waterway,” Hammond said. “Our interests lie across the Indian Ocean and throughout the Pacific Ocean.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698850

File: 56618611273b029⋯.jpg (1.58 MB,4325x3124,4325:3124,The_Virginia_class_attack_….jpg)

>>18698843

2/2

While critics such as former senior Defence official Hugh White have argued Australia should acquire a larger fleet of diesel-powered submarines, Hammond said a “tipping point” would be reached some time in the 2030s or 2040s when these vessels could be rapidly detected and attacked when they rose to the surface to recharge their batteries.

Nuclear-powered submarines, by contrast, can remain underwater for months at a time, making them harder to detect.

“I’m glad we’re a nation that recognises that and is prepared to make the tough decision to spend a significant amount of national treasure on a capability that will remain absolutely relevant for many decades to come,” he said.

The government’s plan will see Australia buy up to five Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines from the United States before it constructs a fleet of eight nuclear-powered “AUKUS class” submarines, based on a future British design, in Adelaide.

Hammond said he vividly remembered the hand-wringing about the development of the navy’s current Collins-class submarines, a unique Australian design, in the 1990s.

Although derided as “dud subs” at the time, he said the Collins-class boats were now widely regarded as some of the world’s best conventional-powered submarines.

“I’m wary of repeating the cycle that this is so complex, it’s too hard, it’s beyond our nation. We’ve built submarines before; we’re going to build them again,” he said.

“I don’t think we should repeat the mistakes around the hand-wringing of the Collins program. We should embrace the challenge and the opportunity that lies ahead.

“From where I sit, the national psyche should be proud of its track record of tackling complex challenges and setting global standards. The Snowy Hydro program is a shining example of that.”

Hammond said it was a “red herring” to argue that nuclear-powered submarines could make Australia less safe because the United States would want to deploy them in a potential conflict with China over the self-governing island of Taiwan.

“We’re not changing the range and scope of our operations; we’re changing the propulsion system that enables those operations,” he said.

As for the argument advances in undersea detection technology could render the submarines useless, he said: “If the pundits are to be believed that the oceans are going to be transparent, they’re being ignored by every navy on the planet. It seems to me that everyone who can afford to build submarines is building submarines – you just have to look at the proliferation in our own region over the past 25 years.”

He said developing a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines was “not something you can turn on at the last minute”.

“You either have a potent submarine capability or you don’t,” he said.

In the short term, he said his priority was the life-of-type extension of the current Collins-class fleet.

“It would be very easy to be seduced by the nuclear program of tomorrow; we’ve got to keep our eye on the conventional capability of today,” he said.

https:// www.smh.com.au / politics / federal/ ignore-the-aukus-hand-wringers-we-need-these-subs-for-sea-bed-battles-navy-chief -20230414 -p5d0ev .html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18698909

File: c76adce42d6c8a8⋯.jpg (209.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Military_forces_from_at_le….jpg)

File: e8eddb8b2ffd268⋯.jpg (231.39 KB,1280x720,16:9,USS_America_left_and_HMAS_….jpg)

File: 5c7ca10769c2e6b⋯.jpg (114.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_with_Indi….jpg)

File: ae6b47807705721⋯.jpg (119.74 KB,768x1024,3:4,Brigadier_Damian_Hill_said….jpg)

Talisman Sabre 2023: Australian Defence Force leads largest ever military drill

Australia will host one of the largest military drills in the world with more than 30,000 personnel and dozens of ships, aircraft and armoured vehicles mobilising.

Charles Miranda - April 15, 2023

Exclusive: Australia will host one of the largest military drills in the world with more than 30,000 personnel and dozens of ships, aircraft and armoured vehicles mobilising from across the region.

Such is the size of the Talisman Sabre 2023 exercise, the “battlefield” has been extended from across the top of Australia to swathes of the Coral Sea down as far south to Jervis Bay in NSW and will even involve Norfolk Island.

The biennial two-week exercise has long been one of the largest Australian Defence Force hosted exercises, run largely with the United States military and involving 17,000 troops.

But with the backdrop of Russia’s mass troop assault on Ukraine and China’s coercive posturing and recent show of force about Taiwan, personnel numbers have doubled with more than 12 allied nations including Germany, France and the UK to participate.

Many of the fictional scenarios to be rehearsed are based about Russia and China’s posturing, notably the Kremlin’s land and air war strategy that spectacularly failed to capture the Ukrainian capital.

Talisman Sabre will involve an airborne drop, mass amphibious landings, live missile firing and submarine hunting; the battle field stretching from Western Australia, across the NT and Queensland and as far south as Jervis Bay in NSW.

Curiously India has yet to commit to joining Talisman Sabre 2023, despite signalling interest two years ago and early last month Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announcing the “top tier security partner” would participate for the first time.

In details to be released by the government today, confirmed participants include Fiji, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, France, UK, Canada and Germany.

The Philippines, Singapore and Thailand will attend as observers. China was not invited but expected to send its spy ships to shadow operations.

“Talisman Sabre reflects a shared commitment to enduring relationships between trusted partners, and a stable Indo-Pacific through an upholding of the rules-based Order,” Defence Minister Richard Marles said.

TS23 Exercise Director, Brigadier Damian Hill said it was the largest iteration of the exercise in terms of both geographic span and also partner nation involvement.

“This year’s exercise will demonstrate our ability to receive large volumes of personnel and equipment into Australia from across the Indo-Pacific and stage, integrate and move them forward into the large exercise area,” he said.

According to planning, locations were chosen to provide “a realistic test of how a large military force would flow into a broad area of operations”.

The ADF will make up one third of the 30,000 personnel involved in the two week exercise.

Quick breakdown of Talisman Sabre 2023

• More than 30,000 personnel to participate from at least 12 nations.

• Designed to test multinational and joint (multi-service) Task Force operations, improve combat readiness and interoperability between Australian, US forces and other partner nations.

• Held between 22 July and 4 August.

• QLD:

– An airborne drop of troops near Charters Towers and amphibious landings at various locations along the north and central Queensland coast.

– Maritime mine-hunting off the coast of Gladstone.

– RAAF Base Scherger at Cape York Peninsula will play central role.

• NSW:

– Long-range fire exercises in Jervis Bay with Japan Self-Defense Forces.

– Air, ground and maritime exercises in Norfolk Island.

• NT:

– Force projection and logistic exercises in the vicinity of Darwin.

– Larger warships will participate in naval gunnery and submarine hunting exercises.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/talisman-sabre-details-revealed-ahead-australian-defence-forces-largest-ever-military-drill/news-story/dd5d00981f27bffc26878820236a56f6

>Talisman Sabre

>MAGIC SWORD

https://qanon.pub/?q=Operation%20Specialists

https://qanon.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18703504

File: 7cba15d151d2a93⋯.jpg (179.36 KB,1024x683,1024:683,The_Liberal_MPs_who_are_fo….jpg)

>>18676743

‘Domino effect’: Liberal supporters of the Voice preparing formal Yes campaign

Anthony Galloway - April 16, 2023

1/2

Liberal supporters of the Voice are mobilising to launch the party’s formal Yes campaign once a parliamentary inquiry settles on the wording of the referendum next month, hoping to double support inside the federal party room.

Current and former Liberal MPs and staffers have created a database of party members who support the Indigenous Voice to parliament, as they look to push back against Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s announcement that the party will formally oppose the Voice.

They plan to launch a “Liberals for Yes” campaign after the parliamentary inquiry into the referendum hands down its findings on May 15.

The party room’s resolution to formally oppose a constitutionally enshrined Voice has caused significant divisions within the Liberals: former Indigenous affairs minister Ken Wyatt resigned from the party and shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser stepped down from the frontbench.

Only two Liberal MPs, Leeser and Tasmanian MP Bridget Archer, have publicly declared they will support the Yes campaign.

However, a number of other MPs – including Andrew Bragg, Russell Broadbent, Jennie Ware, and Richard Colbeck – spoke against elements of the position at a party room meeting on April 5.

Three frontbenchers – Simon Birmingham, Paul Fletcher and Marise Payne – spoke out in a shadow cabinet meeting against the party’s plan, favouring an option put forward by Leeser to allow all members to have a free say on the Voice until the parliamentary committee completed its work.

Many Liberal supporters of the Voice want the Albanese government to accept Leeser’s suggestion to delete clause two of the proposed amendment that empowers the Voice to advise the executive government as well as the parliament. They believe this would address concerns about the Voice’s potentially disruptive impact on the operations of government and make it easier for Coalition voters to support the referendum.

Bragg, a member of the parliamentary inquiry into the wording of the referendum, which held its first hearing on Friday, is holding out from declaring his position until after the inquiry is completed.

He said he believed support for the Voice in the party room could be doubled if the wording of the referendum was changed.

“I want the best possible words to be presented and the evidence [on Friday] was that a number of constitutional experts agree that the words could be improved,” said Bragg, a longstanding supporter of a Voice to parliament and constitutional recognition.

“The better the wording, the better the chances of success. And by better, I don’t mean a Voice which is entirely neutered and can’t speak to the executive.

“There’s a column of support, I think, that could be unlocked if this proposal was de-risked … I think you would double the group.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18703508

File: 37d091c29239078⋯.jpg (4.75 MB,5555x3703,5555:3703,While_the_weight_of_the_Co….jpg)

>>18703504

2/2

Anne Twomey, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Sydney, told the inquiry on Friday that the wording could be amended to be more precise.

“I do not believe the High Court will draw the kind of implications people have said,” Twomey said.

“Could the wording be more precise? The answer is always yes. Do I have objections to it being more precise? The answer is no.”

Liberal members mobilising on WhatsApp

Hours after Dutton announced the party would oppose the referendum for an Indigenous Voice to parliament, some Liberal members were invited into a WhatsApp group entitled “Operation Valkyrie”.

Armed with a codename drawing inspiration from a failed attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler, party members began canvassing how they could push back against the decision and campaign for the Voice.

Liberal MPs said they were never in the group.

It was one of multiple groups created on encrypted messaging service WhatsApp by Liberal members in the hours and days leading up to and following Dutton’s announcement.

There is a wider WhatsApp group that includes current and former MPs and staffers, where discussions on the upcoming steps are taking place.

Members of the group chat said it has a less contentious name than the 1944 plot to overthrow Hitler, which resulted in all the conspirators being executed.

‘Define our party for a generation’

The day before Liberal MPs went into the party room on April 5, their former colleague Fiona Martin sent some of them a text message urging them to be courageous.

“Good luck tomorrow. The outcome of tomorrow has the potential to define our party for a generation. Back yourself, be heard,” read the message from Martin, who lost her seat of Reid at last year’s election.

Martin told this masthead the Voice should have been above party politics, but many Liberals had decided to back an “American-style scare campaign” against the referendum instead.

“We have legal obligations through the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that Australia has supported since 2007,” Martin said.

“My job as a Liberal is to encourage members of my party to see and to highlight our obligations internationally, but also our moral obligations.”

Martin said the Liberal Party should be advocating for the Voice because “we are the party that wants communities to be able to do things independently”.

While the current group of MPs publicly supporting the Voice is small, Martin said she believed there would be a “domino effect” with more coming out onto the Yes side.

“I actually think the more Liberals that speak out and are quite vocal on this, the more likely that we will get other Liberals who are sort of thinking about it now to jump on board on this issue.”

Martin said there would definitely be a formal campaign of Liberals in favour of the Voice, but it would most likely be launched once the parliamentary committee finishes up next month.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/domino-effect-liberal-supporters-of-the-voice-preparing-formal-yes-campaign-20230414-p5d0f6.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18703519

File: c1d04788b7e10d1⋯.jpg (2.13 MB,5252x3501,5252:3501,Sandra_Byron_and_Ashley_Ru….jpg)

Thousands left waiting for compensation after claims of COVID-19 vaccine injury

Mary Ward - April 16, 2023

1/2

Thousands of people are still waiting to learn whether they will receive compensation for injuries they believe they incurred when receiving a coronavirus vaccine, as claimants and lawyers say delays are causing unnecessary distress to people with serious illnesses.

There are calls for the scheme to offer provisional payments to those facing long waits while their claims are assessed, with some waiting up to 10 months to learn if they have been successful.

But the federal agencies charged with managing the scheme say this is off the table, with Government Services Minister Bill Shorten having previously said the small number of approvals among applications reflected the overwhelming safety of the vaccines.

The COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme covers losses or expenses of $1000 or more from injury resulting in hospitalisation or death from specific severe reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine.

Such reactions are rare. More than 65.6 million doses of the COVID-19 vaccine have been administered in Australia of which only a tiny number – 9300 by November – have been “associated” with hospital admission (a categorisation which does not mean the vaccine caused the admission).

Since the scheme began in December 2021, it has paid 126 claims a total of $7.2 million, a fraction of the $76.9 million set aside for possible payments in Services Australia’s portfolio budget statement.

A spokesperson for Services Australia said 2267 claims were in progress or “waiting on further information from applicants” and 562 had been deemed not payable.

As of April 12, the scheme had received 3501 applications. It will stop accepting new applications exactly one year from today.

Sandra Byron, 59, experienced severe symptoms that were later diagnosed as Guillain-Barré syndrome and capillary leak syndrome after taking the AstraZeneca vaccine and is now unable to work or leave her home in West Pymble, on Sydney’s north shore, because of chronic pain.

She and her husband, Ashley Russell, spoke to this masthead in November about having their claim rejected after spending thousands of dollars on specialists, both for Byron’s treatment and to complete paperwork for the claim. They applied for a review on December 1.

“It has been crickets between then and now,” Russell, who quit his job to become his wife’s full-time carer, said last week.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18703522

File: a939b37580f7c45⋯.jpg (2.08 MB,5420x3613,5420:3613,Sandra_has_had_her_vaccine….jpg)

>>18703519

2/2

Accountant Habib Khan, a 36-year-old from Sydney’s northern suburbs, was on life support and unable to work for months after suffering myocarditis, among other injuries, following his Pfizer vaccination in 2021.

Compared to others’ experiences with the scheme, he considers himself lucky: he lodged a claim in February 2022 and received a payout north of $400,000 in November.

“But I was having to do weekly calls and chase-ups,” he said, adding that pulling together his application took two to three hours each day for a month-and-a-half, while he was still too unwell to return to work.

“It was extremely difficult,” he said. “Even though I am used to contracts and paperwork in my job, it was overwhelming.”

Melbourne’s Guardian Injury Law is providing advice to about 100 people attempting to access the scheme. Its principal, Tanya Neilson, said delays, even for cases that she considered very clear-cut, had been lengthy.

“I had a claim that we lodged in May 2022; we still haven’t received an initial outcome,” she said. “That is a claim for [the] AstraZeneca [vaccine] with Guillain-Barré syndrome; an established, TGA-recognised injury.”

Unlike other personal injury schemes, such as WorkCover, which provide a provisional payment while a claim is being assessed, claimants under the COVID-19 vaccine injury scheme do not receive any money until their claim is approved.

“It significantly penalises entitled claimants,” Neilson said. “These are people who are often very unwell, are very injured, and have to wait for Services Australia to assess their claim in its entirety before they receive compensation.”

But the federal agencies charged with devising and administering the scheme say the complex process would not suit provisional payments.

“Such an approach may result in some claimants having to repay the Commonwealth in the event that their claim is determined by Services Australia to be not payable,” a spokesperson for the federal Department of Health and Aged Care said.

The spokesperson confirmed there was no consideration being given to provisional payments.

Asked about the delays, a Services Australia spokesperson said the assessment process could be complex, and claims might also be reviewed independently by medical and other appropriately qualified experts.

“In many cases, Services Australia is required to seek additional information from applicants in order to further progress consideration of their application,” they added.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/thousands-left-waiting-for-compensation-after-claims-of-covid-19-vaccine-injury-20230413-p5d03y.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18703552

File: 7a9534b53c5a40f⋯.jpg (243.17 KB,1412x1884,353:471,Police_allege_accused_Swed….jpg)

File: 80676c4460a8ba4⋯.jpg (153.01 KB,1280x1707,1280:1707,Rivkin_in_his_office_in_De….jpg)

File: bd845c0f9bbbccf⋯.jpg (340.3 KB,1368x1028,342:257,A_home_allegedly_converted….jpg)

File: 9b223a3210aae50⋯.jpg (204.3 KB,2656x634,1328:317,An_AN0M_chat_allegedly_sho….jpg)

>>18484965 (pb)

>>18644395 (pb)

Inside the Firm: How an international drug cartel plotted a ‘line to Australia’

Perry Duffin - April 16, 2023

1/2

The inner workings of a Swedish kingpin’s crime empire have leaked onto the internet, revealing a plan to target Australia’s insatiable drug market to make them rich beyond measure.

The unprecedented glimpse inside transnational drug crime and the AN0M network comes on the eve of a court case that could decide dozens of prosecutions in NSW.

“I have a line to Australia,” Sweden’s Maximilian Rivkin allegedly wrote in an encrypted chat in mid-2020.

“I am now with the biggest people in the world.”

Earlier this year Rivkin was accused, alongside multiple Australians, of being one of the driving forces behind the spread of the encrypted app of choice for serious criminals - the AN0M network.

A US indictment, released by a California court, alleges AN0M’s purpose was to facilitate and protect the global drug trade.

But it was all a trojan horse designed by the FBI and monitored by agencies including the Australian Federal Police.

At about the time Rivkin and the Australians were accused in the US court, Swedish police files were dumped online containing thousands of pages of AN0M chats.

The files, verified by The Herald, allege Rivkin was one of four directors of a Swedish amphetamine cartel called the Firm.

The documents also suggest Rivkin intended to use his connections to expand the Firm’s territory to take advantage of Australia’s sky-high drug prices.

The Firm

“Through conversations on the encrypted platform AN0M, it appears that people in the report form the core of a group that, for a long time, conducted extensive drug crime,” one of the Swedish translated police files begins.

The precise origin of the Firm is not made out in the court files but, in just a few months, it allegedly produced more than half a tonne of amphetamine.

To accomplish their goal, the court documents allege, the Firm transformed a cosy Swedish home into an industrial lab and began shipping drugs around Europe from July 2020.

Pictures shared on AN0M appear to show trays upon trays of amphetamines drying in the lab, drugs in car boots and maps used by drug couriers.

“(The Firm’s leaders) organised extensive amphetamine trafficking in Sweden and also the rest of the world,” the translated documents read.

Staying off the grid

From the beginning, in mid-2020, the Firm was highly secretive.

The house chosen as a drug lab was small and unremarkable, in the lakeside village of Olshammar more than three hours from the capital Stockholm.

Meanwhile, Rivkin allegedly pushed directors and subordinates to message using AN0M.

Before any drugs left Olshammar, according to one series of messages, Rivkin organised for 10 phones to be sent to the Firm in July 2020.

He maintained his enthusiasm for AN0M until the final kilo left the lab in December 2020, police allege.

That month a WhatsApp user called “Anom Goteborg” sent a selfie from his dimly lit office.

The bearded man in the picture smiles confidently, flashing a gold watch and a thumbs-up.

Behind him is a giant AN0M logo, illuminated on the wall with the words “enforce your right to privacy” below.

Another image of a Swedish licence, sent in the chat, suggests Anom Gothenburg was Rivkin.

“Hold AN0M tight, it will be the next big thing,” Rivkin told his contact.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18703557

File: e68d0510ecb91d5⋯.jpg (141.8 KB,1595x978,1595:978,AN0M_chats_allegedly_showi….jpg)

File: c774cf9153786ff⋯.jpg (236.06 KB,1461x976,1461:976,The_drug_lab_as_pictured_b….jpg)

File: 8a171a786c31a16⋯.jpg (679.34 KB,1508x2014,754:1007,Hakan_Ayik.jpg)

>>18703552

2/2

Six months later the world learned AN0M was a masterful deception by law enforcement. But by then the Firm had communicated endlessly on the platform.

“Seneca please take nice pictures with anom this new phone so I can see the bricks and nice presentation,” Rivkin allegedly wrote to the head cook in July 2020.

Seneca replied with an image of vacuum sealed white bricks.

Looking south

By October 2020, the Firm was allegedly dividing up cash and discussing security.

They spoke about using amphetamine to trade for Glock pistols, a Kalashnikov machine gun and grenades, the documents allege.

The documents claim in December 2020, as the Firm completed its final batch, Rivkin told the group that Australians would pay 160,000 Swedish Kroner per kilogram for drugs – six times the amount they were making in Europe. He floated the idea of manufacturing methamphetamine, the documents claim.

“I will give you space for Australia,” Rivkin allegedly wrote.

“If you can manufacture the meth, we won’t know what to do with all the money :)”

Police sources believe Rivkin’s line to Australia was AN0M’s number one influencer and Australia’s most wanted man: Hakan Ayik.

In the US court case, the Kogarah-born Ayik and Rivkin are both alleged to be the top “administrators and influencers” in the AN0M network.

They both allegedly spread the fake encrypted software through the criminal community.

At the time of the court case, both were believed to be living in the same region of Turkey, and both remain on the run.

NSW court to rule on AN0M

Dozens of accused AN0M users were arrested in NSW when the Australian Federal Police carried out a massive raid in June 2021.

Many of them have joined a challenge against the legality of the AN0M intercepts.

Prosecutors are hoping the NSW courts reach a similar conclusion to the South Australian Supreme Court which, earlier this month, ruled the AN0M evidence was legally obtained.

The first tranche of the NSW hearings will start on Monday in Sydney.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/inside-the-firm-how-an-international-drug-cartel-plotted-a-line-to-australia-20230413-p5d0d2.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708538

File: 9d8362d45c3d95f⋯.jpg (107.46 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18676743

Raging moral coercion on the Indigenous voice to parliament is failing

CHRIS MITCHELL - APRIL 16, 2023

1/2

Polarised media coverage of the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament suggests many journalists have forgotten both sides of politics have been working on Indigenous recognition for two decades.

As Sydney University emeritus Professor of Constitutional Law Anne Twomey wrote for The Conversation on April 6, there remains much in common between the latest policy for local and regional voices adopted by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on April 5 and the federal voice supported by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Advocates for the national voice have supported local and regional voice representation for a decade.

It should be possible to oppose the national voice without being called a racist. Abuse should not be hurled at people concerned about potential unintended consequences of a voice for a system of government that has served the nation well.

Yet in some of the left media – and particularly the ABC, the Channel 9 papers and the Guardian – those expressing concerns about the voice are written off as not acting in good faith. Conversely, in parts of the right-wing media, voice supporters are accused of betraying the principles of liberal democracy.

They are berated daily as supporters of a reform they claim “divides Australia by race”.

It is a big leap intellectually to argue the nation’s poorest people with the highest infant mortality rates, highest imprisonment rates and lowest life expectancy will end up with more rights than the 97 per cent of non-Aboriginal Australians because of an advisory role for the voice.

And rights connected with race already exist: the right to unalienated land title that only Aboriginal Australians can claim under the High Court’s Mabo and Wik decisions.

A wild scare campaign in the 1990s suggested these would destroy Australia’s land tenure system and confer unearned privilege on Aboriginal claimants.

Yet Native Title has produced very little benefit to title holders and done very little damage to farming and mining.

This column on August 7 last year criticised media voice advocates who had clearly never read the 270-page voice report commissioned by former aboriginal affairs minister Ken Wyatt under the previous Coalition government. The piece signalled concern about the scope for the voice sought by authors Tom Calma and Marcia Langton. On pages 150 to 155 the report says the voice should be able to make representations on any issues since all government decisions concern Aboriginal people. It makes clear on page 150 the voice should provide advice to both parliament and the government of the day.

That column doubted voters would support such a broad scope for the voice and took aim at Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s pre-election outline of her thoughts about a planned Aboriginal foreign policy and a First Nations ambassador.

The Calma-Langton report specifies the “voice should have scope to take on a role in … international forums”.

Many journalist voice advocates and the Prime Minister in the following months played down the potential for the voice to make ambit consultation claims.

They rejected suggestions by this paper’s Janet Albrechtsen that the voice could entangle governments in High Court cases. They described perfectly reasonable calls for more detail about voice operations as tactics to derail the referendum.

Yet this year Cape York leader Noel Pearson and Langton have specifically defended a possible role for the voice in all policy areas and suggested there should not be concern about the “justiciability’’ of voice submissions because appeals to the courts are the natural operation of the political system. The government had been saying the exact opposite for months.

Forget too retrospective qualms by constitutional conservatives Greg Craven and Julian Leeser who had until recently supported the voice and dismissed any voice criticisms. Both flipped this year on the issue of voice representations to executive government. Yet the Calma-Langton report had outlined wide scope for the voice right back in July 2021.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708539

File: fb39d216701aa28⋯.jpg (87.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18708538

2/2

Here lies the real danger for Albanese and voice supporters. Australians are a practical people who want to see First Australians do better. They would probably support a voice that gave Aboriginal Australians a say in policies specifically directed at Aboriginal issues. They would no doubt support a factual recognition in the Constitution that this land was settled before the British arrived.

But they will surely heed voice opponents such as this paper’s Paul Kelly, Greg Sheridan and Albrechtsen if they suspect the voice will get powers to advise governments in all aspects of public policy. Think climate change, tax policy and foreign affairs for starters.

While a successful voice referendum will damage Dutton, failure because the government would not negotiate voice details could prick Albanese’s leadership bubble in the way backflipping on climate change did to former Labor PM Kevin Rudd in 2010. Albanese will rightly be held responsible if the referendum goes down because the electorate suspects – rightly or wrongly – that the voice could end in New Zealand-style co-governance.

Who can blame Aboriginal political activists for trying to redress hundreds of years of dispossession by trying to win as much power as they think they can under a new left-wing Prime Minister? And who can really support constitutional Recognition but argue Aboriginal people should not have a say in what that means?

But history would surely judge Albanese harshly if either the voice failed for lack of consultation or succeeded only to prove far more powerful – and disruptive to good government – than Albanese suggested.

Here the media needs balance. Voice campaigning has already taken a toll on media credibility.

Many journalists who had previously accused Leeser of trying to derail the voice by seeking more details from the government suddenly backflipped last week and treated Leeser as a hero.

The former opposition spokesman on Aboriginal affairs and attorney-general issues resigned from the front bench on Tuesday to campaign first for changes to the referendum proposal by Albanese and then for a yes vote.

Just as hypocritical was hysterical criticism by some conservatives of Leeser’s resignation. Liberals have always been free to dissent on issues of conscience. Sure there is a logical flaw in Leeser arguing Albanese’s referendum is flawed and must be changed but saying he will campaign for it even if it is not changed.

But some Leeser critics need to remember former leader John Howard’s description of the Liberals as a broad church coalition of social conservatives and economic liberals. Founder Sir Robert Menzies, three-term PM Malcolm Fraser, opposition leaders Andrew Peacock and Brendan Nelson and former Howard deputy Peter Costello were never conservatives in the sense used on Sky News today.

For the sake of the nation and its most vulnerable people, Leeser and others attempting to sway Albanese and his Indigenous voice advisers should be encouraged.

Australians should be given the opportunity to vote on a referendum they could support safely knowing it would not damage the country.

The present strategy built on moral coercion is failing.

National polling is clear in its ebbing support for the referendum.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/raging-moral-coercion-on-voice-is-failing/news-story/e3dc9a7cce2ce0fd85bd525ba30d0e7d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708561

File: 008bf1aadf9fa1e⋯.jpg (249.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,DJI_Matrice_300_drones_in_….jpg)

>>18698909

Call for audit as Chinese DJI drones join Australian Defence Force war games

ELLEN WHINNETT - APRIL 16, 2023

1/2

The Australian Defence Force is using Chinese drones from a company black-listed by the US, prompting calls for a government-wide policy on the use of technology from high-risk suppliers.

Hundreds of drones from Chinese company DJI are in use across the ADF, mainly for training, and some will be used in a three-week military exercise off the Queensland coast in coming weeks.

It comes six years after concerns were first raised about DJI’s cyber security, and six months after the Pentagon black-listed the company, citing concerns it was linked to the People’s Liberation Army.

The revelations have prompted Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles to order a Defence audit of its entire supply chain, including manufacturers and suppliers.

The audit will identify, remove and ban any technology considered inappropriate.

The audit would consider any security concerns held by Australia or Five Eyes partners, particularly involving networked devices and make recommendations to Mr Marles on any mitigations required to ensure Defence security.

“We want to be sure our current procurement policies and practices are fit for purpose, specifically for those products and devices that are currently in use within Defence and the ADF,’’ a spokesman for Mr Marles said. “Where there are concerns identified in the audit, those devices and products will be removed.’’

Mr Marles’ office did not specifically say it would ban DJI products, but news of the audit comes after The Australian raised questions about the technology.

The audit follows the earlier discovery that Defence was also using surveillance cameras and other devices from two other controversial Chinese companies, Hikvision and Dahua, which, like DJI – Da Jiang Innovations – have been black-listed by the US over cyber security concerns and possible military links.

An unofficial edict has led to the government, including Defence, removing more than 900 Hikvision and Dahua devices. The removal of the devices comes at the same time the Albanese government ordered Chinese-owned social media platform TikTok be deleted from all government devices, due to data-harvesting and cyber vulnerability fears.

With Chinese telcos Huawei and ZTE banned in 2018 from involvement in Australia’s 5G network, experts say it is time the federal government to developed a policy and issued national guidelines on what Chinese tech is acceptable.

Director of the Tech Policy Design Centre at ANU, Johanna Weaver, said there was no policy for when Australia should use devices from high-risk suppliers.

“Given the current geo-strategic environment, a whack-a-mole approach to Chinese technology is unlikely to serve Australia’s national interests in the long term,’’ Professor Weaver said.

“A strategic approach that produces clear guidelines and depoliticises the decisions on what tech we will and won’t use would be beneficial.

“The challenge at the moment is it is appearing reactionary, and that allows China to say we are politicising the issue, as opposed to developing a clear, strategic policy which is in Australia’s national interest.

“The reality is that there will be places where it doesn’t make sense to have Chinese technology, such as defence and law enforcement.’’

She said there may be other, less sensitive areas where it was appropriate to continue using Chinese-made technology.

The Australian has confirmed DJI drones are being used by the ADF for battlefield training, aerial observation and to capture images used by the ADF’s public affairs unit. They are also due to be used in the three-week ADF military exercises Sea Explorer and Sea Raider, scheduled to take place off Bowen in Queensland in June and July.

Like all Chinese technology companies, DJI, the world’s largest drone manufacturer, is subject to national security laws requiring it to co-operate with Chinese intelligence agencies if requested to provide data.

The ADF briefly suspended use of the drones in 2017 following security concerns, but put them back into service after making modifications such as ensuring they were not connected to ADF databases and not used at classified sites.

DJI, based in Shenzhen in Guangdong province, strongly denies it is a military company and says its drones are designed for civilian use.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708564

File: ecb40343729954e⋯.jpg (103.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Acting_Sergeant_Brooke_Tol….jpg)

File: ceeacd1c3792005⋯.jpg (55.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,NSW_Police_s_special_servi….jpg)

>>18708561

2/2

ADF documents discoverable online show the Army’s 9th Regiment uses the DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise and Phantom 4+ drones for training, including for night missions and to “develop an understanding of the UAS (uncrewed aerial system) within the battlespace at battery level’’.

The Australian Defence Magazine reported in 2018 that the DJI Phantom training drone was to be used “throughout the entire organisation, including Reservists and Cadets’’ and that Sydney-based personnel from the 17th Combat Service Support Brigade had received a DJI Phantom 4 “as part of the Army’s plan to issue 350 of the systems’’.

They were only to be used in unclassified training scenarios.

Senior Analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Samantha Hoffman, said using DJI was not a wise decision by the ADF “because the risks associated with DJI technology have been known for several years now’’.

“The company has supplied PRC public security work in Xinjiang and, despite claiming to be a non-military enterprise, its drone technology (and drones from other PRC companies) have been exported to Russia extensively since its invasion of Ukraine last year, and, supplied (as I understand, by third parties) also to Ukraine,’’ Dr Hoffman said.

She said there should be a government-wide review of the use of Chinese technology by government institutions.

“That is the starting point if governments are to develop a more sustainable and effective long-term policy for dealing with the challenge, otherwise governments will continue playing whack-a-mole,’’ she said.

“At the same time, I also think banning lists of companies is an ineffective way of dealing with this problem.

“It is not sustainable for governments to continually blacklist companies, and it isn’t very practical to think they can be fully eliminated from our supply chains.

“Governments, and the private sector, need to develop better tools for understanding and assessing risk associated with PRC-produced technologies.

Director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at UTS, James Laurenceson, said bans on China technology should be limited to areas where the risks were greatest.

“Narrow measures like banning TikTok from government devices, removing Chinese-made CCTV cameras in the Department of Defence and requiring our armed forces to gradually reduce their use of Chinese made drones are one thing,’’ Professor Laurenceson said.

“But more broadly, bans and other extreme measures aren’t a solution, and the reason isn’t because Beijing might react badly.

“It’s because in an increasing number of areas, Chinese technology is the best.

“And certainly, no other country can incorporate that technology in manufactured goods and services at the same scale China can.’’

Professor Laurenceson said it was “delusional’’ to think Australia could compete internationally without access to Chinese technology.

“For decades, it was the West that had the best technology and China was seeking to acquire it. But now there are plenty of areas where it’s in Australia’s interests to co-operate with China and not carve it out because otherwise we’ll be consigning ourselves to second-rate technology,’’ he said.

“All this should make the Australian government extremely cautious about extending the narrow measures taken to date.’’

Since Labor’s election last year, Australia and China have been taking tentative steps to improve their relationships, mainly in the areas of trade, and Professor Laurenceson said he was confident the relationship “is now sufficiently resilient to take narrow moves on Chinese technology by Canberra in its stride’’.

“From an Australian national interest perspective, by all means let’s build technology links with the US and our other geostrategic mates,’’ he said. “But China must be part of the mix too.’’

Opposition cyber-security spokesman James Paterson said: “While DJI may be a popular drone manufacturer they are also black-listed by the US government because of their links to the People’s Liberation Army and sanctioned for their role in the surveillance of Uighurs in Xinjiang.

“The Australian Defence Force would have to have a very good explanation why they think it’s safe for us to use when our closest military ally does not,’’ Senator Paterson said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/call-for-audit-as-chinese-dji-drones-join-australian-defence-force-war-games/news-story/b38a1b0b348c543d1ddaebac6a3caeea

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/state-police-have-acquired-chinese-drones-banned-in-us-and-uk/news-story/9f57fd97466119aff36bb7c68af85aab

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708573

File: acde0d8d50d1ca7⋯.jpg (65.27 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Sydney_businessman_Alexand….jpg)

File: 0a64325f18931a7⋯.jpg (128.17 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Alexander_Csergo_has_been_….jpg)

>>18693611

Bondi man sold info on AUKUS and lithium mining to alleged Chinese spies, court hears

ELLIE DUDLEY - APRIL 17, 2023

1/2

Bondi businessman Alexander Csergo sold information about the AUKUS agreement, lithium mining and iron ore to alleged Chinese spies, a court has heard, as he is denied bail and his actions are deemed “highly suspicious”.

Mr Csergo fronted the Downing Centre District Court on Monday for a bail hearing via video link, after he was arrested by the AFP on Friday and charged with one count of reckless foreign interference.

While Mr Csergo‘s defence lawyer said his actions were “nothing sinister”, Magistrate Michael Barko said his decision to meet with alleged spies, using the anglicised names Ken and Evelyn, in cafes in Shanghai was “highly suspicious”.

The cafes were always chosen by Ken and Evelyn and were often empty. Mr Csergo believed they had been cleared specifically for the meetings.

“Empty? In Shanghai?” Magistrate Barko queried.

Mr Csergo was given cash in envelopes in exchange for the highly secure information, Magistrate Barko said. He never deposited the cash, but spent it.

“If I read those facts to any lay-person, they would be highly suspicious of the conduct of the defendant, at the very least,” Magistrate Barko said.

Magistrate Barko also said the Chinese government would be highly interested in the case, and Mr Csergo’s “personal safety” must be protected.

“No doubt when this hits the fan there will be people very interested in him not giving evidence against the Republic of China,” Magistrate Barko said.

“The defendant, I can infer, must have been on the radar of the intelligence authorities in Australia for quite some time.”

Mr Csergo, who owns a Shanghai-based consulting company and has worked in China for many years, unsuccessfully argued there was nothing “sinister” about his dealings with Chinese citizens.

In his submissions to the court, his lawyer Bernard Collaery said there was nothing untoward about Mr Csergo’s consultancy with Ken and Evelyn, but it was merely a business exchange that is common in China.

“(Business people) in China often have an anglicised first name with three characters after,” Ms Collaery said.

“There is a suggestion that there is something off about the fact that two or three of the persons he was in contact with, among hundreds, that there was something sinister about Ken and Evelyn.”

Mr Collaery argued any information Mr Csergo could access was publicly available, and that his interaction with Ken and Evelyn was innocent.

But Magistrate Barko swiftly rebutted: “Why is he getting cash in an envelope for publicly accessible documents? Why couldn’t Evelyn and Ken do that?”.

“I don’t go down to my coffee shop and get an envelope of cash to give them publicly available information,” Magistrate Barko continued.

“What would the lay-person say? The lay-person would say it stinks and there’s something going on.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708576

File: cc4e44eaac4e0e3⋯.jpg (75.97 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Sydney_man_arrested_by_the….jpg)

>>18708573

2/2

Mr Collaery said the AFP were making an example of Mr Csergo’s arrest to show the success of new foreign interference laws introduced in 2018, and illustrate the national security risks of Australian businessmen working in China.

He said the police “unfairly” timed a media release detailing Mr Csergo’s arrest at peak online traffic times to garner greater interest in the matter.

“They arrested him at 6am on Friday and arriving in prime news time was a police release of footage of the arrest and grabs… and talks about espionage,” Mr Collaery told the court.

“He’s not charged with espionage, but it speaks to espionage. Why isn’t he charged with espionage if there’s evidence of that?”

The court heard that Mr Csergo currently lives with his 85-year-old widowed mother in their Bondi home, along with his brother.

Mr Collaery argued Mr Csergo should be granted bail because he is not a flight risk nor a danger to the state.

“He’s being held in solitary confinement, classed as a high security risk prisoner with the lights on day and night,” Mr Collaery told the court, saying Mr Csergo’s current living conditions were impeding his ability to contact his client.

“The police have presented no sworn evidence as to his likelihood of flight. They have seized his passport. He has an aged mother. He shipped his belongings home (from China) and the evidence of that is in his WeChat records.

“He is not charged with directly or intentionally supporting anything that could amount to espionage. He’s not charged with that, even though the press release uses those words.

“He’s of good character. There’s no potential for interfering with witnesses.”

The court heard Mr Csergo grew up in Sydney’s eastern suburbs , having attended Waverley College where he was athletics captain and played int he rugby team.

He completed a Bachelor of Science at the University of NSW, and later studied marketing at the same institution.

In 2002 he went abroad to China, where he became involved in technology marketing companies. During his time in China he worked for Shanghai Volkswagen, and large US data providers.

During and up to the time of the Covid-19 lockdown in China he was working for his own consulting company, Conversys, with a direct connection to Chinese telecommunications through the advertising company JCDecaux.

“He connected the analytical data on purchasing practices for the Chinese and in his role… he had access to 390 million mobile phone data records so that with JCDecaux he could design and develop campaigns that might influence advertising that led into electric vehicle purchasing,” Mr Collaery said.

Coinciding with the Covid-19 pandemic was the Morrison government’s inquiry into the origins of the virus, which impacted foreign business in China.

He returned home once China’s two year lockdown ended.

“He is an extremely successful businessman in China,” Mr Collaery said. “That has all come tumbling down in the last few weeks.”

Mr Collaery said Mr Csergo would file a cross-claim against the Commonwealth “for destroying his career and his business.”

“(He will be) pursuing a case for significant economic loss against the Commonwealth,” Mr Collaery said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nothing-sinister-about-sydney-businessman-selling-public-documents-to-china-court/news-story/eabd8b15e837ee4d975d60160fed9b52

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708612

File: 3113ae024546e1b⋯.jpg (565.4 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Paul_Keating_took_aim_at_F….jpg)

>>18511306 (pb)

>>18516925 (pb)

‘He diminished his legacy’: Penny Wong, Paul Keating escalate feud

Matthew Knott - April 17, 2023

1/2

The feud between two of Labor’s most beloved figures has escalated, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong accusing Paul Keating of diminishing his legacy and the former prime minister attacking Wong for speaking in platitudes and lacking policy ambition.

In an appearance at the National Press Club on Monday, Wong hit out at critics who take “self-satisfied potshots” at the United States, arguing America continues to play an indispensable role in promoting peace and security in the Asia-Pacific as it jostles with rival superpower China for influence.

At a heated appearance at the press club last month, Keating was particularly personal in his criticisms of Wong, saying: “Running around the Pacific Islands with a lei around your neck handing out money, which is what Penny does, is not foreign policy. It’s a consular task. Foreign policy is what you do with the great powers: what you do with China, what you do with the United States.”

Asked about his comments, Wong said: “On Mr Keating, what I would say is this: I think in tone and substance he diminished both his legacy and the subject matter.”

Keating responded to Wong’s speech by doubling down on his criticisms of both her and the government, saying in a statement: “Never before has a Labor government been so bereft of policy or policy ambition ... I never expected more than platitudes from Penny Wong’s press club speech and as it turned out, I was not disappointed.”

In her speech, Wong said a war fought over the self-governing island of Taiwan would be “catastrophic” for everyone involved, arguing it is “our job is to lower the heat on any potential conflict, increasing pressure on others to do the same”.

Beijing last week launched a three-day series of military exercises around Taiwan, which it considers an integral part of its territory, to express anger at Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen’s meeting with the US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

“We call for the peaceful resolution of cross-strait issues through dialogue without the threat or use of force or coercion,” Wong said.

“Because, let me be absolutely clear – a war over Taiwan would be catastrophic for all. We know that there would be no real winners.”

Wong declined to say whether she welcomed US President Joe Biden’s repeated statements that America would intervene to defend Taiwan if it came under attack by China, saying it was important “to do all that we can to press for the maintenance of the status quo through both deterrence and reassurance”.

Wong said she felt it important to deliver a “reality check” that nations in the Indo-Pacific would not have enjoyed their “long, uninterrupted period of stability and prosperity” without the US.

“America has often been talked of as the indispensable power,” she said. “It remains so, but the nature of that indispensability has changed.

“As we seek a strategic equilibrium, with all countries exercising their agency to achieve peace and prosperity, America is central to balancing a multipolar region.

“Many who take self-satisfied potshots at America’s imperfections would find the world a lot less satisfactory if America ceased to play its role.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708613

File: 0483986ad88a07b⋯.jpg (3.02 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Foreign_Affairs_Minister_P….jpg)

>>18708612

2/2

As for Australia’s largest trading partner, Wong said China “continues to modernise its military at a pace and scale not seen in the world for nearly a century with little transparency or assurance about its strategic intent”.

She added that Australians should not “waste energy with shock or outrage at China seeking to maximise its advantage” given this is what great powers do.

Keating said Wong had claimed to eschew “black and white binary choices” but “then proceeded to make a choice herself – extolling the virtues of the United States, of it remaining ‘the central power’ – of ‘balancing the region’, while disparaging China”.

“As a middle power, Australia is now straddling a strategic divide, a divide rapidly becoming every bit as rigid as that which obtained in Europe in 1914,” he said.

“Nothing Penny Wong said today, on Australia’s behalf, adds one iota of substance to that urgent task.”

Wong reiterated the government’s view that it wanted to see WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s espionage case brought to a close but said it was constrained in its ability to convince the US to drop the charges and its extradition request.

“I know that there are some who like to posit ‘you’re not doing this, you’re not doing that’,” she said.

“But what I can say to you is we are very clear about our view. There are, obviously, limits to what you can do in terms of another country’s legal proceedings and we are not party to those proceedings. We cannot intervene in those proceedings just as the UK and US cannot intervene in our legal proceedings.”

Wong said she was glad United Kingdom High Commissioner Stephen Smith recently met with Assange at Belmarsh Prison, where he has been held since 2019, and said she would press for better prison conditions for Assange.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/he-diminished-his-legacy-penny-wong-paul-keating-escalate-feud-20230417-p5d0xh.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708618

File: 9a80ce3432461de⋯.jpg (75.68 KB,800x600,4:3,Penny_Wong_shook_hands_wit….jpg)

>>18676828

Assange imprisonment has gone on for too long: Wong

Andrew Brown - April 17 2023

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has called for the extradition case against Julian Assange to come to an end.

Senator Wong said the legal case and imprisonment of the WikiLeaks co-founder has been going on for too long.

Mr Assange has been imprisoned in the UK for more than four years and faces extradition to the US on espionage charges.

Appeals to stop his extradition are currently before the UK courts.

Speaking at the National Press Club, Senator Wong said the government would continue to press for Mr Assange's release.

"There are obviously limits to what you can do in terms of another country's legal proceedings and we are not a part of those proceedings," she said.

"We cannot intervene in those proceedings just as the UK and US cannot intervene in our legal proceedings."

Australian high commissioner to the UK Stephen Smith visited Mr Assange in Belmarsh Prison earlier in April, the first time an Australian official had visited him in the facility since his arrest.

The foreign minister said it would be good to continue consular assistance to the Australian while he remained in prison.

"Some of Mr Assange's advocates have been raising, rightly, whether or not the conditions in Belmarsh are appropriate," Senator Wong said.

"That is something I will be asking my high commissioner to engage about."

Last week, almost 50 Australian MPs and senators signed a letter to US Attorney-General Merrick Garland urging him to end the pursuit of the WikiLeaks co-founder.

Advocates have urged for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to raise the issue of Mr Assange during upcoming meetings with US President Joe Biden and UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8161607/assange-imprisonment-has-gone-on-for-too-long-wong/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708643

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18564973 (pb)

Lidia Thorpe in clash outside Melbourne strip club

ELLIE DUDLEY and TRICIA RIVERA - APRIL 17, 2023

1/2

Lidia Thorpe has defended her behaviour outside a Melbourne strip club, after footage surfaced of her yelling profanities and telling men they had small genitalia.

The former Greens turned Independent senator Thorpe claimed people were trying to “drag me down,” in a brief statement..

“It’s sad people are utilising whatever they can to drag me down when we’re trying to discuss important issues in this country,” Senator Thorpe said in the statement to Seven News and Sky.

The video shows Senator Thorpe leaving a Brunswick club at about 3am while celebrating a friend’s 50th birthday, Seven News reported.

She was shown shouting at men standing outside before being dragged away by a companion,

“You know what I say to you? You know what I say to you?” she said. “Small penis, small penis.”

A man off-camera can be heard calling Senator Thorpe a “racist dog”. She then yelled at him: “Any black man that stands with the f.cking white little c.nt like that, youse can all get f.cked too.

“We’ve been repressed all our f.cking life in this country and you let this little dog speak.”

The manager of the strip club claims the rogue senator was going up to ‘white men’ before the incident saying: ‘You stole my land’.

David Ross, general manager of Maxine’s, told Daily Mail Australia that Senator Thorpe’s behaviour was ‘just unacceptable’ and that she has been banned for life from the establishment.

It’s not the first time Senator Thorpe has been caught in controversy.

Last year she was forced to resign as deputy greens leader after she failed to declare her relationship with former bikie Dean Martin.

At the time, she said she met the former Rebels president through black activism, and they bonded over a passion for Indigenous rights.

In February, she quit the Greens after refusing to support the Indigenous voice to parliament, saying she would continue to represent the black sovereign movement as an independent.

Later that month, she lay in front of a float at the annual Sydney Mardi Gras halting the whole parade.

Last month police pushed her to the ground on the lawn of Parliament House after she attempted to take the stage at a rally organised for Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull.

The Australian has contacted Senator Thorpe for comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708649

File: 001a5069b96f846⋯.jpg (207.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_takes….jpg)

File: e5f476f27d5dc0b⋯.jpg (167.16 KB,1280x722,640:361,Lidia_Thorpe_shares_a_phot….jpg)

File: 807e9bd27ef578b⋯.jpg (92.85 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lidia_Thorpe_lies_in_front….jpg)

>>18708643

2/2

Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek called Senator Thorpe’s behaviour outside a Melbourne nightclub “obviously unacceptable”.

“It doesn’t matter if you’re a member of Parliament or you’re a member of Parliament or your average person, I think that sort of behaviour in public is just not acceptable,” Ms Plibersek told Sunrise on Monday morning.

“As for whether the Parliament should have the ability to intervene, I think that’s something we would have to consider very carefully.”

Senator Jacqui Lambie said Senator Thorpe should take responsibility for her own actions and says she is “part of the problem”.

“I think that when you are out that late and you put yourself in that sort of situation you have better take responsibility for your actions,” Senator Lambie told Sky News on Monday morning.

“There is no getting out of this, you are a politician, and sometimes we do muck up but not taking any responsibility for that yourself is not very helpful.”

The Tasmanian senator said Senator Thorpe should seek psychological help if she needs it.

“If you do not think you’re in a good way then go and do what the rest of us do and go and get some counselling… because quite frankly something needs to be done,” she said.

“But I would say this to Lidia, you cannot keep doing this and a good start would be you are part of the problem, take the responsibility of your own actions and take it into your own hands.”

Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce says he is starting to “feel sorry” for Senator Thorpe.

“The first thing you have to look at is how the Greens actually preselected her. She is in parliament of course, and I have to say that Labor preferenced her,” Mr Joyce told Sunrise.

“I think that she has to have some serious conversations with a few people about how she is conducting herself and whether it is appropriate and how she gets into that position to act like that.”

Mr Joyce says it is not his view that Senator Thorpe should be kept out of parliament.

“I think once you are elected, you are elected. It can come with a whole range of other issues you can do within the parliament but the Australian people will kick out at the next election.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/lidia-thorpe-in-clash-outside-melbourne-strip-club/news-story/7668fa05d80201688433ae511aa12627

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TV4uvOn8Mzo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708667

File: 5160d53f5607824⋯.jpg (101.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_inquiry_into_the_prose….jpg)

File: 9ba912f900126b9⋯.jpg (110.67 KB,768x1024,3:4,Brittany_Higgins_alleged_B….jpg)

Relations between ACT Police and DPP ‘beset by tension’ over Brittany Higgins’ rape claim

KRISTIN SHORTEN - APRIL 17, 2023

1/2

An explosive complaint from the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions about police conduct before and during Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial lit the match that sparked the Board of Inquiry into the capital’s criminal justice systems.

Walter Sofronoff KC, who is conducting the inquiry, held the Board’s first public hearing in Canberra this morning where it was revealed that the inquiry was established after DPP Shane Drumgold wrote to ACT Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan on November 1, 2022 alleging his officers had conducted 18 months of “inappropriate interference” in Bruce Lehrmann’s prosecution.

Former liberal staffer Brittany Higgins alleged Mr Lehrmann raped her in Senator Linda Reynolds’ ministerial office in the early hours of March 23, 2019 after a night out drinking with colleagues in Canberra.

Mr Lehrmann was later charged with sexual intercourse without consent and pleaded not guilty.

Mr Drumgold’s November 1 letter was sent just days after the 28-year-old’s trial was sensationally aborted in October due to juror misconduct and immediately listed for retrial in February.

Counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC told the inquiry this morning that Mr Drumgold alleged police had “cherry picked” elements of potential evidence in the case and “provided blatant misrepresentations of evidence” to him.

Mr Drumgold claimed that during the trial a number of “disturbing events occurred” including police “constantly and exclusively” engaging directly with Mr Lehrmann’s defence team rather than the prosecution, causing him to distrust the AFP.

In his letter Mr Drumgold called upon Commissioner Gaughan to prohibit any further contact between officers involved in the investigation and the defence team, prosecution witnesses and Ms Higgins.

He also sought to prohibit their attendance at court during the planned retrial.

But in December Mr Drumgold announced he would not prosecute the case again due to the impact it would have on Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Commissioner Gaughan, who attended this morning’s hearing, last year welcomed the inquiry but asked that it look at the conduct of all parties involved including the DPP and explore issues including delays in the trial, the mistrial and the decision of the DPP not to proceed with the retrial.

The inquiry this morning heard that Ms Higgins first reported her alleged rape during a “meet and greet” with AFP officers stationed at Parliament House in early April 2019.

That first stage of the investigation ended when Ms Higgins emailed them on April 13, 2019 advising that she did not wish to proceed with her complaint.

The second stage of the investigation began on February 5, 2021 when Ms Higgins contacted ACT Police and asked for her complaint to be reactivated.

The next day, on February 6, 2021 she met with police who told her they could not recommence the investigation until she provided a record of interview.

Ms Higgins participated in the police interview on February 24, 2021 after sharing her story in the media.

Ms Longbottom emphasised the Board was not conducting an investigation of Ms Higgins’ allegations about Mr Lehrmann but an inquiry into “the way in which each criminal justice agency involved fulfilled their duties”.

She said the inquiry will hear evidence about conflict between the ACT Police and the DPP over their perceptions of what had occurred between Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann.

“You will hear evidence that, from the outset, engagement between ACT Police and the DPP were beset by tensions,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708668

File: 42e44f8a9078dd3⋯.jpg (112.78 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_DPP_Shane_Drumgold_lea….jpg)

>>18708667

2/2

Points of contention included whether it was proper for the AFP to interview Ms Higgins in May 2021, whether Mr Lehrmann should have been charged, the provision of the brief of evidence – including Ms Higgins counselling notes – to Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers before their client had entered a plea and “close engagement” between defence lawyers and police.

The inquiry will consider whether police failed to act in accordance with, or in breach of their duties.

Police will also give evidence about their training, policies, procedures and “underlying cultural views” in respect to investigations of sexual offences.

The inquiry heard that Mr Drumgold has provided an 80-page statement to the inquiry which will examine his decision to commence, continue and discontinue the prosecution against Mr Lehrmann – decisions which are discretionary in nature – and the reasons and motives for his actions.

It will look at the two-stage test for the decision to prosecute which involves considering whether evidence offers reasonable prospects of conviction and, if so, whether the prosecution is in the public interest.

The inquiry will also consider Mr Drumgold’s conduct before and during the trial.

Mr Sofronoff, a retired judge of the Queensland Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, will examine whether Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates acted in accordance with her relevant statutory framework.

Mr Sofronoff said one of the issues that had already arisen for him was that the VoC commissioner has to determine for herself – without investigation – whether a complainant is a victim “rather than waiting for a trial and conviction” and how that impacts on the accused person’s presumption of innocence.

He said it seemed that when the commissioner has to perform her duties in supporting a claimant before allegations are proven, and “adjacent to the criminal justice process”, problems could arise.

Barrister Peggy Dwyer, who is currently counsel assisting at the coronial inquest into Kumanjayi Walker’s death, will represent Ms Yates at the inquiry.

Adelaide silk David Edwardson KC, who represented the Northern Territory police officer who fatally shot Walker, is representing Steven Whybrow SC at the inquiry.

While Sue Chrysanthou SC phoned in to the inquiry to seek leave to represent Network Ten journalist Lisa Wilkinson at the inquiry.

The Board – which has issued 33 statement requests and collected more than 143,000 documents – will begin four weeks of public hearings on May 1.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/explosive-act-dpp-complaint-sparked-bruce-lehrmann-prosecution-inquiry/news-story/d72bf8845173c8c79eb3df3ff9603daf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708691

File: 52351ec327ae85d⋯.jpg (196.93 KB,1280x720,16:9,Twitter_has_labelled_ABC_N….jpg)

File: dc3ff75871924a1⋯.jpg (165.75 KB,823x663,823:663,_abcnews.jpg)

File: 841ed346c2cf04e⋯.jpg (168.93 KB,823x663,823:663,_SBS.jpg)

Twitter labels ABC and SBS ‘government-funded media’

DAVID ROSS - APRIL 17, 2023

ABC and SBS will not quit Twitter, after the social media platforms labelled the public broadcasters’ news services “government-funded media”, lumping the two into a category previously used for government mouthpieces.

Twitter moved on Monday to label ABC News’ account on its platform “government funded media”, in the wake of similar moves in recent weeks that earned the ire of users, leading some media groups to quit the site.

SBS, which was also hit with the “government-funded media” label on Monday, told The Australian the broadcaster would push back on the move.

An SBS spokesman said the broadcaster disagreed with the label applied by Twitter, arguing it did not reflect the nature of the media group’s funding.

Twitter has applied three different labels to media groups in recent weeks, including “government-funded media”, “state-affiliated media”, or “publicly-funded media”.

“While we appreciate Twitter’s motivations with regard to transparency on its platform, we believe a “Publicly funded media” label better reflects the hybrid public-commercial nature of our funding model and the fact that SBS retains full independence from Government in our news editorial and content decision-making,” an SBS spokesman said.

The Special Broadcasting Service is understood to be concerned about the potential for the label to mislead its multicultural viewers, who may see it as government controlled or affiliated.

SBS is partially funded from ad revenues, unlike the ABC.

A spokesman for the ABC said it would contact Twitter in response to the labelling, but said the broadcaster would not stop using the social media platform.

“The ABC doesn’t currently have any plans to shut down all its Twitter accounts,” he said. “The ABC is liaising with Twitter regarding changes to account verification and labels.”

In a statement posted on Twitter, the ABC said it was “a publicly funded broadcaster, governed by the ABC Charter which is enshrined in legislation”.

“For more than 90 years, the ABC has always been and remains an independent media organisation, free from political and commercial interests,” the ABC said.

Twitter claims it brands accounts government funded if they are funded in part or wholly by governments, which “may have varying degrees of government involvement over editorial content”.

Twitter categorises “publicly funded media accounts” as media groups “that receive funding from license fees, individual contributions, public financing, and commercial financing”.

Twitter has been pushing media sites to sign on to its verified organisations service, as the social media group seeks to raise funds in the wake of Elon Musk’s purchase of the platform.

The BBC objected to Twitter’s branding last week, which saw it labelled government funded media, claiming this ignored the broadcasters’ licensing fees funding source.

Twitter chief executive Elon Musk, responding to a tweet about the move, questioned the label asking “Is the Twitter label accurate?”.

America’s National Public Radio forced Twitter to walk back its decision to brand the platform “state-funded media” last week, changing the service’s label.

But the radio network said it would “de-emphasise” Twitter and cease tweeting from the labelled accounts in response.

NPR CEO John Lansing said Twitter’s decision was “unacceptable”.

“After great consideration, we will not put our journalism on platforms that have demonstrated an interest in undermining our credibility and the public’s understanding of editorial independence,” Mr Lansing said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/twitter-labels-abc-and-sbs-governmentfunded-media/news-story/7faafc22cab133f65bce452425d5ddae

https://twitter.com/abcnews

https://twitter.com/SBS

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18708709

File: 58925cf79232a17⋯.jpg (321.42 KB,1298x372,649:186,MRF_D_56.jpg)

File: ac083c8a7ce7822⋯.jpg (536.95 KB,2048x1154,1024:577,341787511_1683118158784816….jpg)

File: 4b75f1eaa17aa08⋯.jpg (588.72 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,341845545_947771169708465_….jpg)

File: 04433d9223949ee⋯.jpg (380.52 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,341403017_5751022101691107….jpg)

>>18676841

Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post

16 April 2023

MRF-D Marines and Army soldiers with 103 Battery, 8/12 Regiment, 1st Brigade - Australian Army conduct dry fire drills on the M777A2 lightweight 155mm howitzers at Robertson Barracks, Darwin, Northern Territory, April 6, 2023. Through increased training and exercises, MRF-D and Defence Australia are expanding our range of interoperability, further strengthening the historic Alliance.

#MRFD #YourADF #AlliesandPartners #trainhard

(U.S. Marine Corps Photo by Lance Cpl. Brayden Daniel)

https://www.facebook.com/MRFDarwin/posts/596965789132575

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18713968

File: 8ec0555a827c47d⋯.jpg (3.1 MB,7125x4750,3:2,Shadow_minister_for_Indige….jpg)

>>18676743

Jacinta Price promoted to shadow cabinet in Peter Dutton’s reshuffle

Lisa Visentin and James Massola - April 18, 2023

Northern Territory Country Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has been promoted to shadow cabinet in the Indigenous Australians portfolio in a reshuffle designed to strengthen Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s campaign against the Voice to parliament.

Price’s elevation to the cabinet comes after much speculation that the first-term MP would be given a more junior assistant minister role.

Victorian Liberal senator James Paterson will move into shadow cabinet in the home affairs portfolio, replacing Karen Andrews, who announced on Tuesday morning that she would move to the backbench and not contest the next election.

West Australian Liberal MP Michaelia Cash will add shadow attorney-general to her current portfolios of employment and workplace relations.

Announcing the changes in Adelaide on Tuesday morning, Dutton praised Price – who sits in the Nationals party room – as a “warrior for Indigenous Australians” who would play a key role in prosecuting the Coalition’s opposition to the Voice.

“I’m incredibly proud of the work she’s been able to do, that she continues to do, and I know she’ll do an outstanding job in leading the charge for better practical outcomes for Indigenous Australians not through the prime minister’s Canberra Voice bureaucracy,” Dutton said.

At a press conference on the Gold Coast addressing her decision to quit the frontbench, Andrews said she made the decision several weeks ago not to recontest the next election.

“I spoke to Peter Dutton and I gave him my view that I would not be standing and seeking re-election at the next federal election,” Andrews said, adding she offered to step down from her role at that point, but the Liberal leader declined.

“But when a reshuffle was happening today, the decision was made that I would step back to the backbench and continue my work from the backbench.”

Andrews said there was no single factor that led her to quit politics altogether but said she was very comfortable with the decision.

Asked about her position on the Voice, Andrews said she did not support Labor’s proposed wording of the constitutional amendment to enshrine the body in the Constitution but would not actively campaign for the No case.

“I’m open as my party is to working with the government on a proper set of words for the constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, but I think that the words that are proposed are not words that I can support, not words that I can advocate for,” she said.

“I won’t be out there wearing a shirt that says vote No. When people speak to me I will go through what my concerns are, but I want to do that in a very neutral way so that people are in a position that they can make their own mind up.”

The reshuffle was triggered by Berowra MP Julian Leeser’s decision to quit shadow cabinet last week in order to campaign for a Yes vote in the referendum after the Liberal Party resolved to oppose the Voice.

South Australian Liberal senator Kerrynne Liddle – the party’s only Indigenous MP – will move into the outer ministry as opposition spokeswoman for child protection and prevention of family violence.

The decision to promote two Indigenous women to his frontbench as part of a broader reshuffle, ahead of the referendum on the Voice to parliament later this year, was first reported by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age on Monday evening.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/karen-andrews-to-quit-coalition-frontbench-ahead-of-peter-dutton-s-reshuffle-20230418-p5d18d.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18713975

File: 270a8642f28bac8⋯.jpg (98.6 KB,1280x720,16:9,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_h….jpg)

File: 91e2111008e32eb⋯.jpg (78.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,Karen_Andrews_has_called_t….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18713968

‘Dramatic increase’ in false Aboriginality claims: Jacinta Price

ROSIE LEWIS - APRIL 18, 2023

1/2

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has warned of a “dramatic increase” in people falsely claiming to be Aboriginal because of the newly legislated voice in South Australia, as she leads the Coalition’s No campaign and is charged with delivering better outcomes for Indigenous people.

Peter Dutton catapulted the Country Liberal Party senator – one of the most outspoken campaigners against the Albanese government’s preferred model for the voice – into his shadow cabinet on Tuesday, in a wider than expected reshuffle.

The Opposition Leader also lost his second frontbencher in two weeks, after Queensland MP Karen Andrews called time on her political career and announced she would move to the backbench and not recontest the next election.

Ms Andrews said her decision had nothing to do with the Liberal Party’s position on the voice, which was the trigger for NSW MP Julian Leeser to quit the frontbench last week.

Mr Leeser’s resignation from the Indigenous Australians and legal affairs portfolios forced Mr Dutton to conduct the reshuffle.

Ms Andrews, who said she was proud to have been the first female Queensland MP in a cabinet role, was appointed to cabinet under Scott Morrison and continued serving on the frontbench in opposition under Mr Dutton.

She listed standing up the manufacturing sector to create personal protective equipment and other items for the national stockpile during Covid-19 as among her top achievements.

“It has been an immense privilege. I want to thank the Liberal National Party members for entrusting me with my preselection, my tireless staff, my parliamentary colleagues, and the incredible personal protection team at the AFP – and, of course, I want to thank my loving family for their unwavering support and their endless understanding of my demanding travel schedule, constant phone interruptions and for regularly cutting short our Sunday lunches to fly down to Canberra,” Ms Andrews said.

“I will continue to support the party position on the voice and to campaign hard for a Coalition victory at the next election.”

West Australian senator Michaelia Cash, who already holds the opposition’s employment and workplace relations portfolios, takes on the shadow attorney-general role, while South Australian senator Kerrynne Liddle has been promoted to the outer ministry as opposition child protection and the prevention of family violence.

Victorian senator James Paterson, considered a rising star in the Liberal Party, has been promoted from the ministry into the shadow cabinet as the new home affairs spokesman. He keeps his existing responsibility as cyber security spokesman.

The makeup of the new ministry means the Nationals, whose partyroom Senator Nampijinpa Price sits in, are overrepresented with seven shadow cabinet ministers while the Liberals have 17. The Nationals make up nearly a quarter of the Coalition partyroom.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18713978

File: 290c306963ef54c⋯.jpg (95.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,South_Australian_Senator_K….jpg)

File: f378a40894997d7⋯.jpg (122.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Michaelia_Cash_wil….jpg)

>>18713975

2/2

Senator Nampijinpa Price said Indigenous leaders in remote communities “don’t have any idea” what Anthony Albanese was proposing for the voice or Yes campaign and didn’t believe they would be represented by “yet another model that they see as being run by those who have had long held positions within the Aboriginal industry”.

In her first press conference as the opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, she said there were lessons to be learned from the South Australian voice and claimed it had been left open for individuals to sign statutory declarations to say they were Indigenous.

She said this was “utterly ridiculous” and “deeply concerning”.

“Another matter that is of great concern, which has been talked about by a lot of Indigenous people around the country, are those who claim to be Indigenous who aren‘t necessarily indigenous,” Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

“You will see in South Australia a dramatic increase in the number of Indigenous people within its population no doubt because of that particular model.”

Under South Australia’s voice, a person is taken to be Indigenous if they are of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent, regard themselves as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and is accepted as an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander person by the relevant community.

A person will be deemed to be of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent if they are biologically descended from the people who inhabited Australia or the Torres Strait Islands before European settlement.

Mr Dutton said a big part of his decision to promote Senators Nampijinpa Price and Liddle – two Indigenous women – was to address youth crime and the sexual abuse of Aboriginal children in Alice Springs and the Northern Territory more broadly.

“We want to provide a brighter future for those kids,” he said.

“We can’t have a situation where we have young children being sexually abused, the impact psychologically on them, the difficulties it creates within a home environment.

“As we know, in Alice Springs at the moment, there are very significant issues. And I just think instead of running off on red herrings and trying to create these distractions, if the Prime Minister doesn’t understand that there’s a problem in Alice Springs, then he should fly there tomorrow.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/price-leads-coalitions-charge-against-voice-in-reshuffle-says-false-aboriginal-claims-deeply-concerning/news-story/afca1a54062ab3324a3bc2a188dcb3b0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18713995

File: 0a08ba53e3ee106⋯.mp4 (15.14 MB,640x360,16:9,Who_is_Jacinta_Price_the_n….mp4)

>>18676743

>>18713968

The rapid rise of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Peter Dutton’s anti-Voice champion

Paul Sakkal - April 18, 2023

1/2

In her first speech in the Senate last July, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price railed against what she described as pointless virtue signalling, saying nothing would help Indigenous children facing the “nightmare of terror” posed by sexual violence.

Pitching the Voice as a vain proposal that would drive a wedge between black and white Australia, the firebrand new senator in a traditional Warlpiri headdress made the Canberra establishment sit up and take notice of her sharp rhetoric.

Fast-forward 10 months and Price, still loudly prosecuting the same arguments, has vaulted to become one of the most prominent Indigenous figures in the country as the opposition’s Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman and a leader of the campaign to defeat the Voice referendum.

“I understand the trials and tribulations of those who are nearest and dearest to me and I will continue to fight for those marginalised Australians,” she said at a press conference on Tuesday.

“They don’t know what the Voice is. They don’t feel like they will be represented by yet another model that they see as being run by those who had long-held positions within the Aboriginal industry.”

She is the daughter of Bess Price, a Country Liberal Party MP who supported the Howard government’s intervention in the NT. She had a little-known career as a musician, initially as a hip-hop artist before releasing a 2013 album – Dry River, a mix of folk and soul that was featured on Triple J, drawing comparisons to singer-songwriter Tracy Chapman.

Price, whose father is white, entered the political arena as a councillor on the Alice Springs Town Council. Her campaign against domestic violence led to her nomination as the Country Liberal Party candidate for the federal seat of Lingiari in 2019. She lost that poll but entered the Senate three years later.

Her uncompromising approach to Indigenous issues might rankle Liberal moderates who are open to the Voice, but it undoubtedly emboldens the No campaign. Many MPs expected her to be appointed to a more junior position than the one she secured on Tuesday.

One of the anti-Voice campaign leaders, Labor-turned-Liberal figure Warren Mundine, praised Dutton’s decision, claiming it gave the No campaign a better chance of success.

“She’s now the shadow minister. That shows the Liberal Party under Dutton is definitely a ‘No’ Liberal Party,” he said, adding that he believed the referendum was on track to fail.

“What a vision: two Aboriginal women [Price and Kerrynne Liddle] are going into the cabinet, both strong No supporters.“

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714000

File: a613ffdd6f6e4e2⋯.jpg (1.98 MB,1833x1222,3:2,Liberal_senator_Jacinta_Pr….jpg)

File: 1c13546ea095002⋯.jpg (98.95 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Jacinta_Price_in_her_days_….jpg)

>>18713995

2/2

The ambitious 41-year-old is a fierce critic of what she calls the elite Indigenous establishment; a group she asserts will be financially and politically rewarded by the creation of the Voice advisory body.

Her labeling of the Voice as a bureaucratic, top-down body drew praise from fellow Indigenous senator Lidia Thorpe in January, before Thorpe left the Greens to kickstart her own campaign against the Voice, arguing it was not radical enough.

“Both of us in our collective experience have seen numerous advisory bodies try and fix things and fail. She has also seen the handpicked spokespeople for our people, who she doesn’t agree with, and nor do I,” Thorpe told this masthead at that time.

But mainstream Indigenous leaders flatly reject her arguments, pointing to overwhelming support for the Voice in Indigenous communities, which is supported by public polling.

Voice architect Noel Pearson has no time for her, and their disagreement has been abrasive and personal. Last year he claimed Price was being used by right-wing think tanks to “punch down on other black fellas”.

Price condemned the remarks as “ugly”. “We didn’t need a crystal ball to know that if you do not agree with the Voice to parliament, you will be called names,” she responded.

Thomas Mayor, a unionist and Yes campaign leader, doubts that Price legitimately listens to Aboriginal people on the ground.

“I can’t imagine we would speak with her,” he said of the mainstream Indigenous advocacy community who support the Voice.

Mayor said voters were more interested in the referendum proposal and its practical implications than Price and Dutton’s political manoeuvres.

Liddle, a Liberal senator from Alice Springs, has worked alongside Price since they were both elected in May. She was also promoted on Tuesday, and is now the Coalition’s spokesperson for child protection and family violence.

Liddle said Price had been focussed on the welfare of Aboriginal people for much of her career.

“[Price has] the commitment, enthusiasm, willingness to interrogate the issues, the willingness to push back when she feels people aren’t paying appropriate attention,” Liddle said.

Former Liberal operative Tony Barry said Dutton was taking a risk in promoting Price, though it might pay off.

“In this case the reward is that Senator Price is a very articulate and powerful advocate with lived experience who can punch holes through the details of the proposal,” the director at Redbridge political consultancy said.

“The risk is she overreaches by playing to the Sky After Dark crowd instead of focusing on message discipline, repetition and reach.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-rapid-rise-of-jacinta-nampijinpa-price-peter-dutton-s-anti-voice-champion-20230418-p5d1d3.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714015

File: 1601865b12f1fb5⋯.jpg (164.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,_The_absence_of_any_protec….jpg)

File: 329c18d853ad3d4⋯.jpg (85.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18676743

Indigenous voice to parliament yes vote is the first step to true equality of citizenship

KIM RUBENSTEIN - APRIL 18, 2023

Inequality of citizenship was reported as the decisive reason behind the Liberal partyroom’s rejection of a Yes vote in this year’s Indigenous voice to parliament referendum.

If this is true then it is based on a blatantly false premise.

Having written the main citizenship law text in Australia, participated in parliamentary inquiries about citizenship, appeared before the High Court on major citizenship cases and advised both the Coalition and Labor on citizenship policy issues, I feel compelled to share how crucial a Yes vote is to ensuring equality of citizenship in Australia.

The Constitution, as it stands, is a central cause for the inequality of citizenship experienced by Indigenous Australians. At Federation, the “people of the Commonwealth” for whom the Constitution was formed were not Australian citizens. Part of a broader commonwealth, the framers who marked out their new constitutional territory were British subjects and were determined to remain so.

This was largely because a citizenship power would disable them from discriminating against non-white migrants and make discriminatory laws over Indigenous Australians harder to defend. Part of a broader commonwealth, the framers who marked out their new constitutional territory were British subjects, and determined to remain so, owing their allegiance to Her Majesty, Queen Victoria, and rejecting the creation a federal power over citizenship. At Federation, Australia’s Indigenous population, while formally British subjects, were treated like aliens in every other sense of the word.

Perhaps more than anything else, the key driver in the formation of Federation, and the Constitution that produced it, was the creation of a uniform power over race and the racist impulse behind White Australia – the exclusion of blacks and Asians.

When it came to Indigenous Australians, they were formally citizens but deprived of substantive membership and needed the 1967 referendum to even include them as being “counted in reckoning the population”. Until then, Indigenous Australians literally didn’t count. After Federation, Indigenous Australians did not share voting rights until the amendment of the Commonwealth Electoral Act in 1962.

State governments also regulated Indigenous Australians. To escape discrimination under Western Australian laws – including restrictions on freedom of movement – Indigenous Australians living there had to apply for “citizenship” under the Natives (Citizenship Rights) Act 1944 (WA). The statute purported to grant “citizenship” to Indigenous applicants who “adopted the manner and habits of civilised life”.

A successful applicant was deemed to be “no longer a native or Aborigine”.

When considering the constitutionality of the legislation, commonwealth Attorney-General Sir Garfield Barwick, Solicitor-General Kenneth Bailey and senior commonwealth lawyers found no contravention of the Constitution. Barwick said WA citizenship was “really no more than a certificate of exemption” from the operation of state laws, especially the Native Welfare Act 1904 (WA). That law prevented the sale of liquor to any “native”.

The 1967 referendum did make changes to the Constitution to represent the start of a journey of recognising Australia’s Indigenous people to be counted (as the Uluru Statement from the Heart identifies). Regarding the commonwealth’s power to make laws for them, it did not correct the imbalance between formal citizenship, which Indigenous Australians already held, and their unequal substantive membership.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714017

File: 315124513191c1c⋯.jpg (262.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Charles_Nuttall_s_painting….jpg)

File: ad57634be962fd3⋯.jpg (186.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

>>18714015

2/2

Indigenous activism about an Indigenous voice in our democratic system and the enabling of an active citizenship to ensure a road to substantive equal membership is not new. It follows a long line of Indigenous claims for a more engaged membership that is now central to public policy for all Australians interested in an inclusive national identity.

The active contribution of citizenship as political participation is specifically identified with the Uluru statement’s powerful ending: “In 1967 we were counted, in 2017 we seek to be heard.”

Seeking to be heard by those who exercise power over them, which this constitutional amendment so effectively will enable, represents a move from formal Australian citizen status to substantive Australian citizenship – that is, to be active citizens and to claim a true acceptance of Indigenous Australians’ rightful and equal place in the Australian nation.

The absence of any protection of citizenship rights has affected the quality of Australian citizenship for all Australians and most profoundly for Indigenous Australians. Constitutional change to ensure the voices of Indigenous Australians are directly heard on laws affecting them is not only important for the recognition of First Nations Australians but necessary to enable equality of Australian citizenship.

A Yes vote in the forthcoming referendum is the first step towards a commitment to an equality of Australian citizenship and should be supported by all Australians no matter what their political leanings.

Kim Rubenstein is a professor in the faculty of business, government and law at the University of Canberra.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/yes-vote-a-first-step-totrue-equality-of-citizenship/news-story/3598a33b46b75c1c73cd21869cf120ac

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714027

File: cf8a45bb63db65d⋯.jpg (240.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Retired_major_general_Gus_….jpg)

File: f14581865d9b7cc⋯.jpg (97.08 KB,768x1024,3:4,Vasyl_Myroshnychenko.jpg)

>>18676820

Defence blames braking fault in Hawkei armoured vehicles for reluctance to supply Ukraine

BEN PACKHAM - APRIL 17, 2023

1/2

Defence is blaming a braking fault affecting the army’s fleet of 1100 Hawkei armoured vehicles for its reluctance to supply war-torn Ukraine with the Australian-made four-wheel drives.

The anti-lock braking system fault can undermine the vehicle’s stopping power at high speeds but does not affect its off-road performance.

After extensive checks, ­Defence believes the entire fleet of the army’s Hawkeis will need to be recalled to fix the problem, which is linked to a faulty component. The move comes five months after The Australian revealed the issue, which led Defence to ban the vehicles from civilian roads and slap them with a fleet-wide 40km/h speed limit.

The fault is holding up the army’s formal acceptance of the $2bn fleet from manufacturer Thales Australia.

But Ukraine is undeterred by the braking issue, releasing a video last week declaring it has a “crush” on the Bendigo-built vehicles, which it describes as “seven tonnes of trouble for temporary occupiers”.

Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said his country hoped to acquire an initial 30-60 Hawkeis to support the country’s coming counteroffensive against Vladimir Putin’s Russian forces.

“If that’s the only issue, it’s not an issue, to be frank,” he told The Australian.

“They will not be used on highways; they will be used off-road where they will never be able to get to the speed where this is an issue.”

Retired major-general Gus McLachlan, a former commander of the army’s 1st Armoured Regiment, said Defence was being “quite risk averse” over the “relatively minor issue”.

“Given that Ukrainians are at war, I think they would probably happily take the risk with something like that,” he said.

“If you're driving on an Australian public road and you put your foot on the brake you want every bit of technology working. But for off-road driving under operational conditions, it’s not something that would be particularly important.”

Major-General McLachlan said the Hawkei was “a great little ­vehicle” that was highly mobile, provided protection for its occupants, and could be equipped with Javelin anti-tank missiles and ­remotely operated machine guns.

He said providing some of the vehicles to Ukraine would also showcase their capabilities to ­potential foreign buyers.

Anti-lock braking systems help prevent skidding and loss of steering on slippery surfaces, but are typically turned off on loose or uneven terrain.

Australia has committed 90 Bushmaster protected vehicles to Ukraine with about 60 of the ­Bendigo-built vehicles already in use with the country’s forces.

Ukraine has argued the war would provide the perfect testing ground for the Hawkeis, which are yet to be used in battle. But the ­Albanese government has resisted supplying the vehicles to Ukraine on Defence’s advice, citing the braking issue as an impediment.

A Defence spokesman said the department was continuing to work with Thales Australia to ­resolve the braking problem, and the government was “committed to delivering on its current contribution to Ukraine”.

Mr Myroshnychenko said Ukraine was interested in using Hawkeis for reconnaissance, command and control and mobile electronic warfare roles, and potentially as an air-defence platform.

He noted Australia’s contract with US defence giant Raytheon to mount surface-to-air missiles on two-door Hawkeis.

“They could be used as ­mobile air defence systems against Russian missiles. And the good thing about it is you put it in one spot, you use it, then you move it,” Mr Myroshnychenko said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714029

File: 0822f243ed1632e⋯.jpg (227.43 KB,1024x683,1024:683,The_Hawkei_has_significant….jpg)

File: 294249a51dc9b46⋯.jpg (217.97 KB,1024x576,16:9,The_Hawkei_protected_mobil….jpg)

>>18714027

2/2

Ukraine is running dangerously low on missiles for its Russian-made S-300 and Buk air defence systems, which form the backbone of the country’s anti-aircraft and anti-missile defences.

President Volodymyr Zelensky has ordered Ukrainian diplomats to work “24/7” to secure more support for the country ahead of its counteroffensive. But Mr Myroshnychenko said last week he was yet to get a clear commitment from the Albanese government on a new assistance package.

“I saw the chief of staff of the (Australian) Minister for ­Defence two weeks ago and she confirmed the department has been instructed to work on a plan for Ukraine this year,” he said. “But I haven’t heard back what that would be and what could be supplied.”

Australia has fallen down the ranks of donors to Ukraine after previously being the largest non-NATO supporter of Kyiv’s war effort.

Australia’s resistance to providing Hawkeis to Ukraine comes amid Russian gains on the battlefield, with Moscow claiming on Saturday to have made advances on the northern and southern outskirts of Bakhmut, in eastern Ukraine.

“Wagner assault units have successfully advanced, capturing two districts on the northern and southern outskirts of the city,” Russia’s defence ministry said in a briefing.

The Wagner mercenary group, headed by Kremlin-linked businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin, has spearheaded much of the fighting for the city, which has little strategic value but has taken on huge symbolic importance for both sides.

Earlier, Russia claimed to have cut off Ukrainian forces inside Bakhmut, which has become the site of one of the bloodiest battles of the 14 month conflict.

The Russian army said its airborne troops were “blocking the transfer of Ukrainian army reserves to the city and the possibility of retreat for enemy units.”

But the Ukrainian army said it was in communication with its troops inside Bakhmut and was able to send them food, ammunition and medical supplies.

The death toll from a Russian strike on a block of flats in the eastern Ukrainian city of Sloviansk climbed to 11. Kyiv said the apartment complex was struck by seven missiles on Friday, hitting five homes, a school and an administrative building.

Ukrainian officials opened a war crimes investigation last week after a video emerged online that appeared to show a Russian ­soldier beheading a Ukrainian prisoner.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia was “appalled” at the reported killing, which she ­described as “a heartbreaking ­example of the horrors Russia is inflicting on Ukraine through its illegal and immoral war”.

“Australia stands with Ukraine and strongly supports international investigations into war crimes,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/defence-blames-braking-fault-in-hawkei-armoured-vehicles-for-reluctance-to-supply-ukraine/news-story/94436793866cb09891233be142b279e4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714036

File: 80f028ffe6d991d⋯.jpg (131.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,Alexander_Csergo_has_been_….jpg)

File: 2824d8e184fd84d⋯.jpg (62.89 KB,768x768,1:1,Sydney_businessman_Alexand….jpg)

>>18693611

>>18708573

China ‘a danger’ to accused AUKUS information seller Alexander Csergo

ELLIE DUDLEY - APRIL 18, 2023

1/2

The Bondi businessman alleged to have sold AUKUS information to Chinese spies could be in danger from “people very interested in him not giving evidence against the Republic of China”, according to a magistrate who ruled that keeping him detained would help ensure his safety.

Alexander Csergo was denied bail on the grounds he was a flight risk after a court heard he sold information about the AUKUS security agreement, lithium mining and iron ore to alleged Chinese agents in exchange for envelopes of cash.

Mr Csergo appeared via video link before Downing Centre District Court from his cell in Parklea prison on Monday.

The court heard Mr Csergo would visit Australia with a “shopping list” of information requested by the alleged spies, who had contacted him through his public LinkedIn page.

He would write the information and deliver it to the alleged spies, who were using the anglicised names Ken and Evelyn, in return for envelopes stuffed with cash that he would never deposit, but spend outright.

Ken and Evelyn organised numerous meetings with Mr Csergo in frequently empty cafes across Shanghai, which they selected.

They would always arrive at the venue before Mr Csergo, and always leave after him.

While Mr Csergo’s defence lawyer staunchly opposed any suggestion his client’s actions were “sinister”, magistrate Michael Barko disagreed, deemed him a flight risk and refused to grant him bail.

“If I read those facts to any lay-person, they would be highly suspicious of the conduct of the defendant, at the very least,” Mr Barko said.

Mr Csergo’s “personal safety” and the Chinese government’s presumed interest in the case were cited as additional reasons to keep him imprisoned.

“No doubt when this hits the fan there will be people very interested in him not giving evidence against the Republic of China,” Mr Barko said.

“The defendant, I can infer, must have been on the radar of the intelligence authorities in Australia for quite some time.”

Mr Csergo, who owns a Shanghai-based consulting company and has worked in China for many years, has vowed to file a counter-claim against the commonwealth for “destroying his career and business”.

“(He will be) pursuing a case for significant economic loss against the commonwealth,” his lawyer, Bernard Collaery, said.

Mr Collaery argued there was nothing untoward about Mr Csergo’s consultancy with Ken and Evelyn, and that it was merely a common business exchange.

“(Business people) in China often have an anglicised first name with three characters after,” he said. “There is a suggestion that there is something off about the fact that two or three of the persons he was in contact with, among hundreds, that there was something sinister about Ken and Evelyn.”

Mr Collaery argued any information Mr Csergo could access was publicly available, and his interaction with Ken and Evelyn was innocent.

But Mr Barko swiftly interjected: “Why is he getting cash in an envelope for publicly accessible documents? Why couldn’t Evelyn and Ken do that? I don’t go down to my coffee shop and get an envelope of cash to give them publicly available information.

“What would the lay-person say? The lay-person would say it stinks and there’s something going on.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714037

File: 08a6b5cbac86b3a⋯.jpg (91.7 KB,768x1022,384:511,Alexander_Csergo.jpg)

File: e354181a9de9522⋯.jpg (63.49 KB,1024x770,512:385,Alexander_Csergo.jpg)

>>18714036

2/2

Mr Collaery said the AFP was making an example of Mr Csergo’s arrest to show the success of foreign interference laws introduced in 2018, and illustrate the national security risks of Australian business people working in China.

He said the police “unfairly” timed a media release detailing Mr Csergo’s arrest at peak online traffic times to garner greater interest in the matter.

“They arrested him at 6am on Friday and arriving in prime news time was a police release of footage of the arrest and grabs … and talks about espionage,” Mr Collaery told the court.

“He’s not charged with espionage, but it speaks to espionage. Why isn’t he charged with espionage if there’s evidence of that?”

The court heard Mr Csergo lives with his brother and their 85-year-old widowed mother in their Bondi home. Both family members were seated in the front row of the court. Mr Collaery argued Mr Csergo should be granted bail because he is not a flight risk nor a danger to the state.

“He’s being held in solitary confinement, classed as a high-security-risk prisoner with the lights on day and night,” Mr Collaery told the court. “The police have presented no sworn evidence as to his likelihood of flight. They have seized his passport. He has an aged mother. He shipped his belongings home (from China) and the evidence of that is in his WeChat records.

“He is not charged with directly or intentionally supporting anything that could amount to espionage … even though the press release uses those words.

“He’s of good character. There’s no potential for interfering with witnesses.”

But solicitor Connor McCraith, for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, said Mr Csergo repeatedly met with Ken and Evelyn in full knowledge they were working for a Chinese intelligence agency. “He met with them in private meetings and exchanged thousands of WeChat messages,” Mr McCraith said.

“He returned (from China) to Australia with a shopping list to gather information.

“This was all done in a certain state of mind: he believed Ken and Evelyn worked for a Chinese intelligence agency.”

The court heard Mr Csergo grew up in Sydney’s eastern suburbs and attended Waverley College. He completed a Bachelor of Science at the University of NSW, and later studied marketing at the same institution.

In 2002 he went to China, where he became involved in technology marketing companies. During his time in China he worked for Shanghai Volkswagen and large US data providers.

Through Covid-19 he worked for his own consulting company, Conversys, with Shanghai-based headquarters. One of its clients was advertising behemoth JCDecaux, through which Mr Csergo gained access to data detailing 390 million mobile phone records, the court heard. He will face court again on June 14.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nothing-sinister-about-sydney-businessman-selling-public-documents-to-china-court/news-story/eabd8b15e837ee4d975d60160fed9b52

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714044

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

2 NY residents allegedly ran secret Chinese police station: 'Significant national security matter'

Justice Department calls alleged activity in New York City a 'significant national security matter'

Greg Norman and Marta Dhanis - April 17, 2023

1/2

The FBI and federal prosecutors announced Monday the arrests of two New York residents who allegedly ran an undisclosed Chinese government police station in Manhattan's Chinatown neighborhood.

Lu Jianwang and Chen Jinping have each been charged with conspiring to act as agents of China's government, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York.

Breon Peace, the U.S. attorney for that office, said China's Ministry of Public Security (MPS) "has repeatedly and flagrantly violated our nation's sovereignty, including by opening and operating a police station in the middle of New York City."

"Two miles from our office, just across the Brooklyn Bridge, this nondescript office building in the heart of bustling Chinatown in Lower Manhattan has a dark secret. Until several months ago, an entire floor of this building hosted an undeclared police station of the Chinese National Police," Peace said. "Now, just imagine the NYPD opening an undeclared secret police station in Beijing. It would be unthinkable."

"Here's what we know happened inside the secret police station in Lower Manhattan. At the very least, the station was providing some government services, like helping Chinese citizens renew their Chinese driver's licenses," Peace continued. "But to do even that, the law requires that individuals like the defendants who act as agents of a foreign government give prior notice to the attorney general before setting up shop in New York City. That didn't happen."

"More troubling, though, is the fact that the secret police station appears to have had a more sinister use on at least one occasion," Peace added. "An official with the Chinese National Police directed one of the defendants – a U.S. citizen who worked at the secret police station – to help locate a pro-democracy activist of Chinese descent living in California. In other words, the Chinese national police appear to have been using the station to track a U.S. resident on U.S. soil."

"The two defendants whose arrests we're announcing today destroyed evidence of their communications with the Chinese national police when they learned of the FBI's investigation," Peace said. "These two defendants knew they had something to hide, and they obstructed justice in an attempt to prevent the FBI from learning the full extent of what they were up to."

Peace said his office and the FBI's New York field office are the "first law enforcement partners in the world to make arrests in connection with the Chinese government's overseas police stations."

Both defendants in the case were arrested at their homes in New York City on Monday morning, he said. Both are U.S. citizens. Their first court appearance on the charges took place Monday.

Michael Driscoll, assistant director-in-charge of the FBI's New York field office, said, "Not only was the police station set up on the order of MPS officials, but members of the Chinese consulate in New York even paid a visit to it after it opened."

Peace said that "before helping to open the police station in early 2022, Lu Jianwang had a longstanding relationship of trust with [Chinese] law enforcement, including the MPS."

"In 2018, Lu was enlisted in efforts to cause a purported Chinese fugitive to return to China," Peace continued. "The victim of that effort reported that he was repeatedly harassed to return to China. That victim received threats of violence against his family in the United States, and MPS officers harassed a victim's family in China."

The Justice Department earlier described the announcement as a "significant national security matter."

The defendants are scheduled to appear in court Monday afternoon before a magistrate judge.

"Thanks to our investigation and arrest today with the FBI, the defendants will be held accountable," Peace said. "And the MPS is on notice that we will not tolerate similar threats to our national sovereignty."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714047

File: 1cf1e330c7f8705⋯.jpg (312.73 KB,1600x900,16:9,A_six_story_glass_facade_b….jpg)

File: f2ab58a74ad05a2⋯.jpg (159.92 KB,1600x900,16:9,Lu_Jianwang_third_left_and….jpg)

File: ac640920184a7f8⋯.jpg (293.96 KB,1600x900,16:9,Justice_Department_officia….jpg)

File: 06a2f0f6f591b16⋯.jpg (89.35 KB,1280x720,16:9,Two_New_York_residents_wer….jpg)

File: fa50559c396bb1e⋯.jpg (132.67 KB,1200x675,16:9,Related_suspects_in_the_ca….jpg)

>>18714044

2/2

Peace also announced charges Monday against 34 MPS police officers belonging to a task force called the "912 Special Project Working Group."

They are accused of conspiracy to transmit interstate threats and conspiracy to commit interstate harassment.

"This task force isn't a normal police force. It doesn't protect people or combat crimes. It commits crimes targeting Chinese democracy activists and dissidents located outside of the People's Republic of China (PRC), including right here in New York City," he said.

"This task force operates as an Internet troll farm, creating thousands of fake online personas, which they use in a coordinated plot to harass dispatch, reach and threaten dissidents and activists throughout the world," Peace added. "People who the PRC perceives as threats to the legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party."

Peace said in one instance, in an online video conference on the topic of countering communism – which was held on a U.S. technology platform – "task force officers flooded the video conference and drowned out the meeting with loud music and vulgar screams and threats directed at Chinese dissidents."

"In addition to threatening and harassing Chinese dissidents, the MPS officers use their fake online personas to spread official Chinese government propaganda and narratives to counter and overwhelm the dissidents' pro-democracy speech," he added, describing that with their exposure, "the world now has a unique, never-before-seen view of how the PRC government deployed this army of Internet trolls."

The Justice Department also said that in this scheme "on several occasions, the defendants used online personas to contact individuals assessed to be sympathetic and supportive of the PRC government’s narratives and asked these individuals to disseminate group content."

A third federal criminal complaint unsealed Monday charged an additional 10 people, including a former China-based employee of a U.S. telecommunications company, with conspiracy to commit interstate harassment and unlawful conspiracy to transfer means of identification.

"As alleged, Julien Jin and his co-conspirators in the Ministry of Public Security and Cyberspace Administration of China weaponized the U.S. telecommunications company he worked for to intimidate and silence dissenters and enforce PRC law to the detriment of Chinese activists in New York, among other places, who had sought refuge in this country to peacefully express their pro-democracy views," First Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Pokorny for the Eastern District of New York said in a statement.

The complaint, which builds on charges announced by the Justice Department in December 2020, "reveal that Jin worked directly with and took orders from defendants at the MPS and the Cyberspace Administration of China to disrupt meetings on the Company-1 platform and that the co-defendants had targeted U.S.-based dissidents’ speech on Company-1’s platform since 2018."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/two-ny-residents-arrested-running-secret-chinese-police-station-significant-national-security-matter

https://www.9news.com.au/world/china-usa-secret-chinese-police-outpost-revealed-in-ny-two-men-arrested/116f546d-f6c0-4afa-a09f-6bc823486d5a

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iadcAIID1K8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714060

File: 2dd06ee0a95a06c⋯.mp4 (15.49 MB,640x360,16:9,Fears_fake_Chinese_police_….mp4)

File: 35d338f54dcf9db⋯.jpg (228.93 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_car_was_spotted_in_Mel….jpg)

File: 690e89746bc7899⋯.jpg (130.79 KB,1024x884,256:221,Ft4LlR4agAE0uVh.jpg)

>>18714044

Confusion as ‘Chinese police’ car spotted on street in Melbourne’s southeast

It’s understood Australia’s foreign interference taskforce is investigating the vehicle.

Molly Magennis - 18 April 2023

A car modified to look like a Chinese police vehicle has been spotted on a road in Melbourne’s southeast.

A photo of a grey Nissan with Chinese characters on its bonnet and side reading “police” and “special police” appeared on Reddit on Sunday.

The car also featured a purple shield logo used on official police cars in China.

The user who posted the photo said they had reported the car to local police, who indicated they had received five calls in 90 minutes about the same vehicle.

The poster also said the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation had contacted them about the location of the vehicle.

Similar Chinese police cars have been spotted in Australia in the past, including in Adelaide in 2019 during the height of the pro-Hong Kong democracy protests.

Foreign affairs expert Greg Barton told 7NEWS the sighting of the vehicle may cause concern for some people who have said unfavourable things about the Chinese state.

“For people who have concerns about things they’ve said … this kind of thing is very worrying,” he said.

It’s not clear if the vehicles are funded directly by the Chinese Communist Party.

“The more plausible scenario … is that someone has done it with a nod and a wink from Chinese authorities at least feeling assured that they’re not going to be punished by Chinese authorities,” Barton said.

“I wouldn’t want to think that anyone was seeking to intimidate them or cause them stress or harm.”

In Victoria, there are laws against impersonating a police officer or a police vehicle, however the laws do not extend to the impersonation of foreign authorities.

Victoria Police say no criminal offence has been committed.

7NEWS understands Australia’s Countering Foreign Interference Taskforce is now investigating the vehicle.

The sighting of the vehicle comes as two Chinese nationals were arrested on Tuesday on charges of operating an illegal police station in New York City.

The Justice Department said the station was being used to “monitor and intimidate” critics of the Chinese government.

The two men are expected to be arraigned on conspiring to act as agents of the People’s Republic of China and obstruction of justice.

https://7news.com.au/news/vic/confusion-as-chinese-police-car-spotted-on-street-in-melbournes-southeast–c-10382266

https://www.news.com.au/technology/motoring/on-the-road/fake-chinese-police-car-spotted-in-melbourne/news-story/3dfa47208ce655fd0205dc8e96842388

https://twitter.com/DrewPavlou/status/1647767262743625729

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714072

File: 40d3a8ab803b766⋯.jpg (132.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_US_president_Donald….jpg)

File: 3496c03d355d95b⋯.jpg (77.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_in_….jpg)

File: 7fec56448cda5fd⋯.jpg (91.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Republican_presidential_ca….jpg)

>>18696839

Tarnished Trump may hand Biden a new term

TROY BRAMSTON - APRIL 18, 2023

1/2

It is a good time to be an octogenarian president seeking re-election in 2024.

Joe Biden has always been underestimated and his political obituary written and rewritten. But Biden, with a string of accomplishments and almost certain to face Donald Trump, has as good a chance of re-election as any president despite his advanced age.

Trump was a criminal businessman and criminal president who committed high treason against the US when he sought to undermine and then overturn the 2020 election. Trump was a terrible president who diminished US global standing by weakening alliances and disastrously managed the pandemic response. (Anyone for an injection of bleach?)

The charging of Trump with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in relation to the payment of hush money to former Playboy model Karen McDougal and adult film actor Stormy Daniels has energised his supporters and resulted in a surge in campaign donations. It has all but guaranteed Trump the Republican nomination for president next year.

But the indictment – the first time any former president has been charged – probably dooms Trump’s election chances. Most US voters, according to polls, believe Trump acted illegally and should be disqualified from running for president again. Independent voters, especially, see Trump as toxic.

Trump’s political star has been declining. He narrowly beat Hillary Clinton in 2016 with three million fewer votes. He presided over a Republican midterm campaign that resulted in losing the House of Representatives in 2018. He then lost the presidency in 2020 with seven million fewer votes than Biden. And, before his term ended, lost the Senate. He is drawing smaller crowds than during the 2016 and 2020 election campaigns. He does not attract the media attention he once did. Last year’s midterm elections demonstrated how diminished Trump was when many of his candidates lost and Biden’s Democrats had among the best midterm results for any party in a century.

The former president’s legal troubles are just beginning. The Justice Department is investigating the removal of government documents from the White House. Of more serious concern is the department’s criminal probe into Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election and his incitement of the US Capitol riot that resulted in death and destruction.

Perhaps the most serious is the Georgia investigation into Trump’s attempt to strongarm officials into stealing the state’s electoral votes. “I just want to find 11,780 votes,” Trump told Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in a phone call. That is evidence of an attempted coup. No president is above the law. It would be political not to bring charges if there was credible evidence of illegality, and there is.

Yet, for all that, Trump leads rivals for the Republican nomination for president. Indeed, he is ahead of yet undeclared Florida Governor Ron DeSantis by a 2:1 margin in polls of Republicans.

Other challengers such as Nikki Haley and Asa Hutchinson have little chance against Trump. Former vice-president Mike Pence may enter the race. In any event, the campaign will be a demolition derby with Trump destroying his opponents.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18714077

File: 4430e7b07c93781⋯.jpg (215.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Theodore_Roosevelt_campaig….jpg)

File: 0486efe438be298⋯.jpg (99.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,Biden_gestures_as_he_deliv….jpg)

>>18714072

2/2

The Republican Party is hostage to Trump; it has become a cult of personality. Forget about the party of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight D. Eisen­hower, Ronald Reagan or George HW Bush. That party is long gone. Moderate Republicans such as Thomas Dewey and Nelson Rocke­feller are extinct. And good luck finding an authentic conservative such as Barry Goldwater or George W. Bush.

The Republican Party, captured by Trump, has no coherent philosophy or ideology. It has become a party of extremists with members of congress and supporters subscribing to bizarre conspiracies and motivated by grievance. It is nativist, protectionist and undemocratic.

Most Republican politicians support the Dobbs decision by the US Supreme Court and subsequent state laws limiting or banning a woman’s right to have an abortion, but most voters do not.

If Trump fails to win the Republican nomination for president, he could run as an independent or mount a third party bid. This also would be disastrous for Republicans.

In 1912, former president Roosevelt failed to wrest the Republican nomination from incumbent president William Taft and ran as Progressive candidate. This allowed Democrat Woodrow Wilson to win the presidency with 41.8 per cent of the vote.

While Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Marianne Williamson are challenging Biden for the Democratic nomination, they have no chance of winning.

But another potential third party bid by a group called No Labels could spell trouble for Biden. This well-funded so-called centrist and bipartisan party, registered in several states, is scouting for a presidential nominee. It could draw votes from Biden.

A Biden-Trump contest, both as major party nominees, is all but set for next year. It would be the first presidential rematch since Eisenhower versus Adlai Stevenson in 1956. Trump would be the fifth former president to contest an election as a party nominee, following Martin Van Buren, Millard Fillmore, Grover Cleveland and Roosevelt. Only Cleveland won.

Biden can point to many achievements from infrastructure spending and lowering the cost of medicines to student debt relief and investment in renewable energy. He passed a gun law reform bill and elevated Ketanji Brown Jackson to the US Supreme Court. The biggest issue in the campaign will be the future of US democracy, as it was in the midterms, and Trump is viewed by many as a threat to the republic.

Next year’s election will be, as ever, quite the political show. The big story is that Trump’s indictment, with more charges to come, have energised his base and likely given him a lock on the Republican nomination. But Trump’s criminal past, now catching up to him, probably has made him unelectable. It leaves Biden, who will be 82 a fortnight after election day, poised to make history. Again.

Troy Bramston is a senior writer and columnist with The Australian. He has interviewed politicians, presidents and prime ministers from multiple countries along with writers, actors, directors, producers and several pop-culture icons. He is an award-winning and best-selling author or editor of 11 books, including Bob Hawke: Demons and Destiny, Paul Keating: The Big-Picture Leader and Robert Menzies: The Art of Politics. He co-authored The Truth of the Palace Letters and The Dismissal with Paul Kelly.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/tarnished-trump-may-hand-biden-a-new-term/news-story/ab7c14228a90f720b8ee1eb620fab98b

https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

>These people are STUPID.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719335

File: 0339a3be820b4ea⋯.webm (15.88 MB,1024x434,512:217,Jacinta_Price_features_in….webm)

>>18676743

>>18713968

Voice will ‘divide our family’: Price and husband front ‘No’ campaign ad

Michael Koziol - April 19, 2023

The Coalition’s newly appointed Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the Voice to parliament will divide her family, in a new campaign funded by right-wing lobby group Advance Australia launching on Wednesday night.

Price and her Scottish-Australian husband Colin Lillie appear in a video, a portion of which was released on Wednesday by a new campaign outfit called Fair Australia, which describes itself as “a grassroots movement of Australians” but is run and paid for by Advance Australia.

“Later this year they want to establish a so-called Voice to parliament. This is a really big deal,” Price says in the advertisement. “The Constitution is the rule book for governing the country, and they want the rules to change. This will divide us.”

Lillie says: “I love my family. And a line going through my family, I won’t stand for that.” Price then adds: “I don’t want to see my family divided along the lines of race because we are a family of human beings, and that’s the bottom line.”

Lillie is not Indigenous; he was born in Scotland and is an Australian citizen. According to an email from Advance Australia, the clip is from a nine-minute documentary filmed in Price’s hometown of Alice Springs that will be published online.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton appointed Price, who has long opposed the Voice to parliament, as shadow minister for Indigenous Australians on Tuesday following the resignation of Julian Leeser, who quit the frontbench so that he could campaign in favour of the reform.

The Advance campaign will be led by Price and based on four pillars: that the Voice is divisive, dangerous, expensive and “not fair”.

“The activists behind the Voice have had their chance and now enough is enough. Aboriginal Australians do not need a taxpayer-funded lobby group written into the heart of our Constitution,” the campaign website states.

“There are already too many culture warriors in this country – in the public service, in our sport, in our schools, and in our workplaces. They’ve come for Australia Day, and they’re coming for more. The Voice will mean they have the constitutional right to do so. It’s time we said: enough.”

Former High Court chief justice Robert French rejected that assertion last week after deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley claimed the Voice could have a de facto role in changing Australia Day or Anzac Day. French told a parliamentary inquiry the claim had “no substance” – and while the Voice could call for change, it would only be advice.

Eminent constitutional lawyer Bret Walker also said the idea the Voice would jam the courts with legislative challenges was “too silly for words”.

Advance Australia is a conservative lobby group that once branded itself as the right-wing’s answer to GetUp!

Executive director Matthew Sheahan told the group’s subscribers the ad campaign would “knock the pro-Voice activists out of the park”.

Earlier this month, Sheahan boasted the group raised more than $250,000 towards its anti-Voice campaign in March, which he said was subsequently matched by major Advance backer Simon Fenwick, a former fund manager.

During the 2022 federal election campaign, Swimming Australia threatened Advance Australia with legal action over mobile billboards deployed by the lobby group against transgender inclusion in sport. The advertisements contained photographs of prominent swimmers used without consent.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/voice-will-divide-our-family-price-and-husband-front-no-campaign-ad-20230419-p5d1pz.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719348

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18719335

One, Together - Full Documentary

Fair Australia

Apr 19, 2023

Warlpiri woman and mum of four, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price shares her story of being part of a blended family in Australia and her lived experience in remote Indigenous communities.

"What's important to me is that we don't divide ourselves along the lines of race in this country. I don't want my family to be divided by race because we are a family of human beings and that's the bottom line."

www.fairaustralia.com.au

#VoteNOAustralia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYvCdvUDy7U

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719352

File: 3b90070c99a4cea⋯.jpg (130.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine_wi….jpg)

File: aea50e28a5f6910⋯.jpg (83.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Tom_Calma_C_and_Marcia_Lan….jpg)

>>18676743

So many clashing voices, so little of worth achieved, writes Nyunggai Warren Mundine

NYUNGGAI WARREN MUNDINE - APRIL 19, 2023

1/2

This year Australians will vote at a referendum for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice. But the Albanese government refuses to discuss the details, pointing us to the 2021 Indigenous Voice Co-design Process report by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton.

At 270 pages long the report makes for impenetrable reading. All for a supposedly advisory body with two dozen members. No other Australian government body or agency takes this long to explain.

That’s because the voice is not an advisory body. It is a vast, expensive new bureaucracy that will interface at every level of government.

The report outlines the structure of the voice to parliament as existing on three levels. Regional voices choose members of the national voice. And there are local voices that suddenly occur in the document without any introduction or explanation. I’m still not sure who the local voices will be or their function. Perhaps they will somehow make up the regional voices, but it’s not clear how this will happen, except to say they will be constructed around a process and principles.

It will be a long journey to get there. The process involves formal commitments from governments that translate into expected legislative processes at the state and territory, and also local government, levels.

Those of you who thought that some commonwealth legislation after the referendum was the end of it, think again. What’s proposed isn’t just legislation to establish a national voice. It is a “whole of government” co-ordination and collaboration with local and regional voices that will involve even more legislation.

A key purpose of this legislation is to set out “the recognition process and assessment criteria”.

This is legislation we currently know nothing about.

But it doesn’t stop there. There will be “a joint process between a prospective Local & Regional Voice and relevant governments to prepare for recognition, followed by an independent party verification of the assessment”. Who is this unknown “independent party”, or indeed many unknown relevant parties, that will guide ministers in their decision-making over the legislation that provides this recognition? And for a process so all-encompassing who’ll be left that’s independent?

The regions for the regional voice structures have yet to be determined. The original recommendation was for an arbitrary 35 regions, now reduced to 22 entirely new artificial regions imposed on Indigenous Australia. Each will appoint one member of the national voice, with the government appointing the remaining two.

Communities and governments will work together to negotiate the breakdown of the regions, “based on agreed parameters and guidance”. Is this bureaucratese for being dictated to? I can tell you now there’s no easy way for agreement over the boundaries of these regions or among the groups actually expected to coexist within them.

These regions bear absolutely no resemblance to the traditional owner groups and first nations and each contains a huge number of Aboriginal organisations. In a scathing observation in its submission to the Calma-Langton co-design group, Ngaanyatjarra Council said this could “effectively nullify authentic Indigenous voices, rendering them meaningless”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719354

File: 481c56bad8d1d91⋯.jpg (136.53 KB,1280x720,16:9,First_public_hearing_in_th….jpg)

File: f272998700d6379⋯.jpg (110.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine_pi….jpg)

>>18719352

2/2

The process also includes what is referred to as “transition to voice structures” with each regional voice and local voice to “build on existing arrangements”. What existing arrangements? No arrangement exists for appointing a representative in Canberra. Where there are none there will be a process of “designing the arrangements” by community-led “design groups”. Are we to have 22 more of these turgid design reports that take years and cost millions to produce?

Communities across each region (are these the same as the local voices?) will be supported to establish their own arrangements. Arrangements for what? Is this a means to choose the regional representatives to go to Canberra to sit on the national voice? Some other things this tome had no space for.

The report continues: “There will be structured, documented and transparent partnership arrangement between a Local & Regional Voice and governments, consistent with the principles. This includes agreed dispute resolution processes, including third party mediation as needed.” I can tell you now the disputes and mediation part of this function is going to be very busy.

Each local and regional voice will be supported by a secretariat or “backbone” team in each region. All have their own relationships with government agencies and departments that Anthony Albanese has promised will “need to seek written advice from the voice early in the development of proposed laws and policies”.

The mind boggles. Nine principles will dictate the implementation. All are complex and multilayered. The local voices and regional voices – not to mention the departments and agencies – will need to have more than a PowerPoint introduction to these principles. Perhaps another 300-page report?

The voice won’t just be some grand, meaningless gesture. It will be enormously costly and complex, and there’ll be chaos and confusion in its development. And to what end? Aboriginal people need less bureaucracy in their lives, not more. A 24-member advisory body is just the tip of a very large iceberg that Australia is hurtling towards like the Titanic.

Nyunggai Warren Mundine is director, Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies, and president of Recognise a Better Way. Acknowledgments to academic, historian and Warraimaay woman Vicki Grieves Williams for her research and contribution to this series of articles.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/so-many-clashing-voices-so-little-of-worth-achieved-nyunggai-warren-mundine/news-story/9d8f80c1b8e496426dbb517c5a26332b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719359

File: 8634950ec88bb6b⋯.jpg (78.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,Cape_York_leader_Noel_Pear….jpg)

>>18676743

Noel Pearson says Queensland must lead the push for Yes in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum

LYDIA LYNCH - APRIL 19, 2023

Noel Pearson says Queensland must be at the forefront of the Yes campaign for the referendum as he appealed to the state Liberal National Party to support the Indigenous voice to parliament.

Speaking at a Yes campaign event at Queensland parliament on Tuesday night, Mr Pearson urged the LNP opposition to make a “sensible decision” and “not lose an opportunity” to enshrine an Indigenous voice in the Constitution.

“We have got five of the six states, so this is possibly the most important meeting of this campaign,” he said. “This is the state that really has to be at the forefront of the referendum. We shouldn’t allow ourselves to be the one state that doesn’t cross the line in October.”

An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian this month showed a majority of Australians in a majority of states supported enshrining a voice in the Constitution.

In Queensland – the home state of Mr Pearson, Liberal leader Peter Dutton and Nationals leader David Littleproud – there were 49 per cent of people in favour of the voice and 43 per cent in the No camp.

Queensland Opposition Leader David Crisafulli has not revealed how he will vote at the referendum, saying he was still weighing up his position and generally didn’t “go off half-cocked on things”.

“There isn’t a vote tomorrow, it is still many months away and there is still a parliamentary report that has to come back,” he said last week.

Mr Pearson – a key contributor to the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the founder of Cape York Institute – said Brisbane and Queensland were “tremendously important to the referendum”.

“Let’s not make the country and Indigenous people victims of a confected political fight between left and right, progressives and conservatives; that is not what this is about.

“I am very confident we are going to get five of the six states, I just wouldn’t like my home state to be the exception.

“I really want the government and opposition to really think seriously about how we can make Queenslanders vote for the right thing.”

Tuesday night’s event was attended by about 30 state MPs including most of Annastacia Palaszczuk's frontbench, One Nation’s Stephen Andrew, Greens’ Michael Berkman, independent Sandy Bolton and LNP MPs Rob Molhoek, Sam O’Connor, David Janetzki and Trevor Watts.

Gold Coast-based Mr O’Connor said he supported the voice, which was a “simple but powerful way to deliver better outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people”.

“I would like to see the reference to executive government removed from the proposed wording because I think it is unnecessary. If that isn’t changed, I will still vote Yes later this year because I back the concept and don’t want to see us miss the chance to achieve constitutional recognition.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/noel-pearson-queensland-must-lead-yes-drive-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/280c6fa9c94e3192948b4aaa6192e69a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719406

File: fe046bff52a2e07⋯.jpg (130.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_left_US_P….jpg)

File: e6b4a7c1b7cb2c5⋯.jpg (1.49 MB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0001.jpg)

File: 633f72c92a7cbc2⋯.jpg (312.54 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0002.jpg)

File: 52dfa8eb9925c7b⋯.jpg (583.02 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0003.jpg)

>>18670474

Chinese-Australians ‘more wary of AUKUS’, Lowy survey finds

BEN PACKHAM - APRIL 18, 2023

Chinese-Australians are significantly less supportive of the AUKUS alliance and the prospect of Australian military involvement in a US war against China than the broader Australian population, a new survey suggests.

The Lowy Institute’s Being Chinese in Australia Poll also reveals a big jump in the proportion of Chinese-Australians expressing concern at “foreign interference” by the US in Australia’s political processes, from 36 per cent in 2021 to 62 per cent in the latest survey.

They are less concerned about foreign interference by Beijing, with 54 per cent identifying it a problem compared with 50 per cent in 2021.

The poll shows Chinese-Australians have much more confidence in Anthony Albanese (60 per cent) than they did his ­predecessor Scott Morrison (49 per cent), reflecting the Labor Prime Minister’s efforts to dial-down the friction between Canberra and Beijing.

It reveals Chinese-Australians are about four times more likely to trust Xi Jinping to do the right thing in world affairs than members of the wider community, but their confidence in the Chinese President has fallen over time.

According to the poll – now in its third year – the vast majority of Chinese-Australians (92 per cent) believe Australia is a good place to live, and three quarters are proud of Australia’s culture and way of life.

One in five Chinese-Australian respondents said they were called offensive names in the past 12 months – an improvement on the previous poll – but a sizeable minority (18 per cent) reported being physically threatened or attacked because of their Chinese heritage.

The survey found an increase in support for democracy as a form of government. Almost half of Chinese-Australians say that democracy is preferable to any other kind of government, an increase of 14 points since 2021.

Only about a quarter of Chinese-Australians believe the AUKUS nuclear submarine alliance with the US and the UK will make Australia safer, compared with 52 per cent of the broader population. Chinese-Australians are also sceptical of the value of the “Quad” partnership between Australia, the US, Japan and India, with only 33 per cent saying it will make Australia more safe, compared with 53 per cent for the wider community.

The survey suggests about 36 per cent of Chinese-Australians would support the deployment of Australian forces in a US-led war against Taiwan, compared with about 51 per cent of the broader population.

Project director Dr Jennifer Hsu said the survey was important at a time when the effects of growing geopolitical competition were being felt in Australia. “In recent years, Chinese-Australians have come under greater scrutiny, and some have had their loyalty to Australia questioned,” she said.

“Grasping the impact that these and other issues are having on how Chinese-Australians see their place in Australian society is critical to our social cohesion.”

Like all Australians, the issue that most worries Chinese-Australians is a severe downturn in the global economy.

Chinese-Australians are less likely than the rest of the Australian population to see China as a military threat.

A significant majority of Chinese-Australians believe that Australia should be neutral in any conflict between the US and China, compared with just over half of the general population.

About 40 per cent of Chinese-Australians are in favour of deploying Australian forces to conduct freedom of navigation naval operations in the South China Sea and other disputed areas claimed by China, compared with 60 per cent of the broader population

The latest survey includes the responses of 1200 adults in Australia who identify as being of Chinese heritage. The survey was conducted in late 2022 and is funded by the Australian Department of Home Affairs.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/chineseaustralians-more-wary-of-aukus-lowy-survey-finds/news-story/99d6455265a960a2782269ef0a9c8c1a

https://interactives.lowyinstitute.org/features/chinese-communities/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719425

File: 87317b5408506fb⋯.mp4 (15.64 MB,960x540,16:9,Mark_McGowan_badmouths_And….mp4)

Live mic picks up WA premier badmouthing shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie at Beijing lunch

Hamish Hastie - April 19, 2023

1/2

On day one of a historic Chinese trade mission, West Australian Premier Mark McGowan has unwittingly reignited a feud with shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie after a microphone picked up his disparaging comments made about Hastie’s views on China.

McGowan’s office on Tuesday sent footage from the China-Australia Chamber of Commerce lunch in Beijing where McGowan spruiked WA as an investment destination while accompanied by Australia’s Ambassador to China, Graham Fletcher and the chamber’s chair, Vaughn Barber.

In the video, a brief conversation within earshot of Fletcher between Barber and McGowan was apparently accidentally captured. McGowan makes comments about an unnamed former trade minister, Hastie and another Coalition MP, now OECD Secretary-General, Mathias Cormann.

“So, I like Mathias Cormann, he had the same view as me, but he had no sway … on this issue. He had a lot of sway, but on this issue, he was the odd one out,” he can be heard telling Barber in the footage.

“The other Western Australian who was senior, well, there was a few of them actually – Hastie.

“He swallowed some sort of Cold War pills back … when he was born, and he couldn’t get his mindset out of that.”

McGowan’s disdain for the previous Commonwealth government’s handling of the China relationship is no secret, with the premier taking particular aim at former defence minister Peter Dutton ahead of and following the May 2022 election.

Hastie and McGowan have also been trading barbs over China since 2019 but Hastie, a former SAS officer, did not take kindly to the latest remarks.

Hastie, who served as chair of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security from 2017 to 2020 and was assistant defence minister from 2020 to 2022, said the WA premier was out of his “intellectual depth”.

“The truth is that he’s a prison guard looking for work now that the pandemic has finished,” he said.

“I’m not surprised he’s running down Australian MPs in China, but it is surprising from a former legal officer in the Royal Australian Navy.

“I’m not sure I’d want to serve alongside him on a naval ship in a crisis.

“Character is everything, what’s he really saying when the cameras aren’t running?”

Hastie criticised the premier for inserting himself in foreign policy debates and said he wished he would focus on domestic issues like fixing the Peel Health Campus in Hastie’s WA Canning electorate rather than trying to do Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s job.

Hastie pointed McGowan to Wong’s speech delivered at the National Press Club on Tuesday when she said China continued “to modernise its military at a pace and scale not seen in the world for nearly a century with little transparency or assurance about its strategic intent”.

Wong also said the Albanese government would approach its China relationship with calmness and consistency, recognising that it will remain Australia’s largest trading partner for the foreseeable future.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719437

File: 007a32784203cf0⋯.jpg (3.78 MB,5066x3377,5066:3377,Opposition_defence_spokesm….jpg)

>>18719425

2/2

A spokeswoman for McGowan doubled down on the premier’s conversation she said was with people who had an important role in the economic relationship between the two countries.

“Mr Hastie’s comments about potential armed conflict with China were irresponsible, immature and dangerous. Australians don’t want or need inflammatory commentary like that,” he said.

“It is widely acknowledged that the former Liberal Government damaged our economic relationship with our biggest trading partner and the state government is committed to strengthening the relationship to benefit the local WA economy and local jobs into the future.”

In a keynote address to the Beijing lunch, McGowan made comments about the previous government’s handling of the relationship, but the video provided to media cuts out before the topic is discussed in detail.

His office was unable to provide that section of the speech.

McGowan is the second Australian premier to visit China since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic following a visit by Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews earlier this month.

Controversially, Andrews did not invite any media to join him on the trip.

McGowan’s office did invite WA media but visa issues prevented all but one journalist and one photographer from The West Australian newspaper from travelling with him.

In place, McGowan’s team has agreed to send videos produced by a Chinese videography outfit to Perth media outlets.

High on McGowan’s agenda is to boost international student numbers to Perth as well as bring more direct flights from the country to Perth.

McGowan told the lunch that foreign policy was not his responsibility, but he previously said he would advocate for the removal of tariffs on Australian exports caught up in a trade fight over the course of the pandemic including wines, lobsters and barley during meetings in China.

“I’m not responsible for Australian foreign policy, what I am responsible for is the economic health and social and cultural connection between the state of Western Australia and China,” he said.

“It’s about making sure that on our level we can advocate for a sensible and respectful, responsible relationship so that is what I will be doing during my time here.”

In March, a live microphone got the Premier in hot water after he told Deputy Premier Roger Cook in parliament that issues surrounding a Perth Mint dilution scandal were a “storm in a f-cking teacup”.

The reporter is not related to Andrew Hastie.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/western-australia/live-mic-picks-up-wa-premier-badmouthing-shadow-defence-minister-andrew-hastie-at-beijing-lunch-20230419-p5d1hl.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719453

File: e0b3b628a5bdd41⋯.jpg (1 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Daniel_Andrews_met_with_a_….jpg)

File: eef17f1b8b6b16f⋯.jpg (303.81 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Jenny_Mikakos_told_IBAC_a_….jpg)

IBAC finds Victorian government advisors put pressure on public servants to award contract to union

Richard Willingham - 19 April 2023

1/3

Senior staff in Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews's government interfered and pressured public servants to ensure lucrative contracts were awarded to a key Labor Party ally without competitive tender, the state's anti-corruption watchdog has found.

The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) has slammed the premier, health ministers and the public service for the awarding of a contract in 2018 to the Health Workers Union (HWU) to deliver specialist training to deal with occupational violence.

"The union was given privileged access and favourable treatment,'' IBAC's Operation Daintree found.

"The combined effect of these failings and unethical conduct resulted in a contract that should not have been entered into with the union and an outcome which was not in the public interest."

During her interview with investigators, former health minister Jenny Mikakos told IBAC "it appeared the contract had only been entered into to placate [HWU secretary Diana] Asmar during the election period and looked like a 'way … of injecting funds into the HWU'".

But IBAC's report, tabled in state parliament on Wednesday morning, stopped short of findings of corrupt conduct, instead saying Mr Andrews should be accountable to parliament for the behaviour of his staff.

Findings of corruption under Victorian legislation require findings of criminal conduct.

"[Operation Daintree] did however reveal a range of concerning conduct and omissions in breach of the public duties and ethical obligations of ministers and ministerial advisors,'' the report said.

"It also identified conduct by senior public servants that fell short of the required Victorian public sector standards."

The key concern for the anti-corruption commission was the behaviour of advisors working for Mr Andrews and former health ministers Jill Hennessy and Jenny Mikakos. Both women have since left parliament.

"The pursuit by advisors of the perceived interests of their ministers, including the premier, at the expense of proper process and standards is another example of the phenomenon of grey corruption that is of increasing concern to integrity bodies around Australia," the report said.

IBAC said grey corruption "involves the bending or breaking of rules, even if that might not amount to criminal behaviour, but that unfairly favours the allies, friends and networks of decision makers".

Premier labels report 'educational'

The report found ministerial advisors bypassed normal protocols in dealing with the public service to ensure the contract was awarded and then upheld.

There was also constant communication between union secretary Diana Asmar and ministerial advisors about the project, with pressure put on the department to ensure it occurred.

To tackle this, IBAC has made 17 recommendations to ensure staff and ministerial codes of conduct are less opaque, and to crack down on advisors pressuring public servants.

IBAC also suggests allowing parliamentary committees to call advisors to ministers, which is currently not allowed.

The report is also critical of some public servants for not providing frank and fearless advice.

"The evidence from Operation Daintree provides a powerful example of the apparent increase in the pliability of the public service,'' IBAC said.

Mr Andrews addressed the media in a hard hat and high-vis at a press conference with Deputy Premier Jacinta Allan to discuss their government's North-East Link build in the hours after the scathing report was tabled. It took about six minutes for Mr Andrews to raise the IBAC report.

"We thank them for that report, there are 17 recommendations made in that important educational report. I will lead, as the chair of the cabinet, a cabinet process to consider those issues and we will respond in due course," he said.

Mr Andrews noted that there were no findings against anyone in the report but acknowledged "the recommendations do go to a number of serious matters, important matters".

"The staff members that are referred to in this report do not work for the government anymore and have not worked for the government for years. And of course, as you well know, the two ministers who are referenced in the report are not even members of the parliament any longer," he said.

"So obviously, I am accountable and fundamentally responsible for driving a process to consider those 17 recommendations, look at them very carefully, to potentially further engage with IBAC to seek their advice and then to respond once that work has been done."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719458

File: 01b9d42e2e7ef95⋯.jpg (364.42 KB,2560x1703,2560:1703,Daniel_Andrews_told_IBAC_h….jpg)

File: 2314c15b7eaf625⋯.jpg (112.16 KB,1115x836,1115:836,The_report_stopped_short_o….jpg)

>>18719453

2/3

When asked about IBAC's comments relating to "grey corruption", Mr Andrews said it would be inappropriate to comment on the "commentary" found within the report, repeating that there were no findings against anyone.

"The issues that IBAC raise in very broad, sweeping, often undefined terms, are picked up in a series of recommendations that have been made," he said.

Opposition Leader John Pesutto labelled the report "scathing" and said it went "to the heart of the Andrews government['s] abuse of process and a complete lack of integrity".

"Soft corruption, grey corruption, call it what you like — it's all corruption," he said.

Mr Pesutto appeared at his afternoon press conference with a series of IBAC and Ombudsman reports involving the Andrews government, including the recent Operation Watts report.

He said the time had come for Mr Andrews "to seriously consider his position" but stopped short of calling for him to resign.

Million-dollar contract awarded with no competitive tender process

In 2018, the HWU made an unsolicited proposal to the Andrews government to develop a training program to addresses occupational violence and harassment.

The government awarded a $1.2-million contract to the union to provide the training to 575 frontline health workers just hours before it went into caretaker mode ahead of the November 2018 state election.

The training program was delivered by a new entity called the Health Education Federation (HEF), which was set up by the HWU.

It had no experience and there was no competitive tender process.

A week earlier, the premier made an election promise for another $2.2 million to train 1,000 frontline health workers in partnership with the HWU.

It followed a meeting between Ms Asmar and the premier just weeks before.

Mr Andrews was interviewed in secret as part of Operation Daintree, as IBAC went to court to try and stop The Age newspaper from disclosing details of the probe during last year's state election.

IBAC said the premier "had no recollection of what he discussed with Ms Asmar, no recollection of any discussion with his advisors that led to this announcement [election promise] and no awareness that they and the Minister for Health's advisor had discussed a detailed proposal".

"After the Premier realised that his recollection of what he announced was faulty he left open the possibility that he may have made a commitment to Ms Asmar but remained quite uncertain that what he announced amounted to a commitment,'' the report said.

IBAC found that a ministerial advisor in Ms Hennessy's office "exerted pressure" on the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to award the contract.

It also found the decision by DHHS to contract the HEF "without undertaking a competitive procurement process was driven by a belief of senior staff in that department that that was the minister's and government's preference, and by ongoing pressure from the ministerial advisor and secretary of the union".

Mr Andrews, Ms Hennessy and Ms Mikakos all said, at times, that they were unaware of the specific activities of their staff.

"It would be a matter for parliament to consider whether the conduct of his advisor in this case was sufficiently serious for the Premier to be held personally responsible for it, on the basis that he ought reasonably to have known about it,'' IBAC said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719466

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18719458

3/3

Report finds HEF 'not equipped' to fulfil contract

In 2019, feedback for HEF's pilot program was poor but it didn't stop the project.

Among concerns about the training program were reservations that it was plagiarised, was littered with grammatical errors and did not address key areas of risk.

"From the outset, it was apparent to DHHS officers that HEF was not equipped to deliver the training,'' the report said.

"During 2019, DHHS found HEF's performance under the contract to be so poor that it was subsequently said by numerous witnesses, including former Minister Mikakos and Executive Officer A, to be a contract that should never have been awarded to HEF."

Despite pressure to delay the training program from department officials, Ms Mikakos' office directed the program to continue.

IBAC said an advisor "intruded into DHHS' management of the contract in ways favourable to the HEF and against the public interest".

Ultimately, only 83 of the planned 575 staff got training and only $335,000 of $1.2 million was actually paid.

COVID halted the program in March 2020.

Ms Asmar spoke frequently with advisors in the Premier's Private Office (PPO) and the health minister's office and the report is critical of the access she was able to get.

In 2021 she complained to then-health minister Martin Foley that funding from DHHS for the training program still had not come.

'Tentacles everywhere': Concerns about centralisation of power, public servants

Throughout the 128-page special report, the anti-corruption watchdog highlights the centralisation of power in Mr Andrews's private office, a criticism privately held by MPs and ministers for years.

The report highlights how it was normal practice for PPO advisors to assess proposals from stakeholders rather than passing it onto a minister's office.

"The Premier is accountable to Parliament for the conduct of his staff,'' the report said.

Ms Mikakos said the current government was "very centralised with the PPO having its tentacles everywhere".

Responding to questions about the report, Mr Andrews said he disagreed with the "sweeping contention that my office is not working hard" to deliver election commitments and deal with challenges facing the state.

While most of the findings centre on advisors working for the premier and ministers, the report also raises issue with the performance of the public service.

"Operation Daintree provides a case study of multiple occasions on which some officers in the department did not make impartial, frank and fearless decisions,'' it said.

IBAC noted that Victoria is not unique in the erosion of public service independence and observed there needs to be better protection for public servants to do their job without fear of retribution from government.

"Such fears can relate to the denial of development opportunities, such as higher duties assignments, secondments or training, or loss of chances to be promoted through to 'get(ting) your marching orders' as one DHHS witness put it,'' the report said.

The ABC has attempted to contact Ms Mikakos, Ms Hennessy and the HWU.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-19/ibac-vic-government-daniel-andrews-operation-daintree-findings/102237590

https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/media-releases/article/ibac-report-highlights-improper-influence-and-bypassed-procurement-processes-in-victorian-government-health-worker-training-contract

https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/publications-and-resources/article/operation-daintree-special-report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqeHw5Zjp8A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719485

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18637716 (pb)

>>18637732 (pb)

TikTok ban backlash: China thinks it’s foolish

60 Minutes Australia

Apr 16, 2023

Anyone who cares to search will undoubtedly find some very amusing TikTok videos made about the very uproar TikTok has been causing lately. Last week it was banned from Australian government phones and devices. It’s deemed to be a risk to our national security because of the Chinese ownership of its parent company. The decision has upset the local arm of TikTok who maintain their app is harmless fun, not a spy tool. As Amelia Adams reports, it has also outraged the Chinese Communist Party, which is once again warning us not to treat Beijing as the enemy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nilz7sI35AE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719500

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18708709

Watch: U.S. Marines and Aussies Form an Unbreakable Bond Through Dry-Fire Drills

Defense Now

Apr 19, 2023

U.S. Marines with Kilo Battery, 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment (Reinforced), Marine Rotational Force-Darwin, and Australian Army soldiers with 103 Battery, 8/12 Regiment, 1st Brigade, conduct dry fire exercises, with M777A2 lightweight 155mm howitzers, at Robertson Barracks, Northern Territory, Australia, April 6, 2023.

Through increased training and exercises, MRF-D and the Australian Defence Force are expanding their range of interoperability, further strengthening the Alliance. (U.S. Marine Corps video by Cpl. Gabriel Antwiler)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN0Peg6alFI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18719526

File: f5e614a6b0203e1⋯.jpg (715.26 KB,825x1553,825:1553,USM_6.jpg)

File: 6f0e17c531c8eca⋯.jpg (1.83 MB,2843x4096,2843:4096,Fth2_iKXoAAQPTc.jpg)

>>18676841

U.S. Marines Tweet

Col. Brendan Sullivan, commanding officer of @MRFDarwin, visits the Australian War Memorial alongside @AustralianArmy Maj. Todd O’Callaghan, Directorate of Army Operations, Australian Army Headquarters, April 6.

#MRFD23 focuses on regional relationships with #AlliesAndPartners.

https://twitter.com/USMC/status/1646196504720293924

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723374

File: 2708afb58f4a93c⋯.jpg (67.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_joins_members_….jpg)

File: 3e739d5447e6709⋯.jpg (119.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

>>18676743

Torment of the past demands voice for future, says Thomas Mayo

THOMAS MAYO - APRIL 20, 2023

1/2

For most Indigenous Australians, we seek constitutional recognition because of the love we have for our children and our country. After all, if this referendum fails, it will have detrimental impacts on the health and wellbeing of our families and communities for generations. If it succeeds, we know they will enjoy better lives.

I am not using emotional blackmail to convince you to vote Yes – a criticism I have heard from agents of the No campaign. But emotional motivation can coexist with reason. This is logic at work, based on the clear evidence of failure in the trials and errors of policy, past and present.

As a pragmatist, I am a supporter of constitutional recognition through a voice to parliament because I want to see solutions. I believe many Australians will share these practical motivations. They will vote at the referendum based on their understanding that saying Yes will improve the lives of Indigenous people. This is understandable. Who could disagree there is a problem that we as a nation have a responsibility to address?

Today, Indigenous Australians are only 3.2 per cent of the population yet we are 12.5 times more likely to be imprisoned as an adult and 26 times more likely to be imprisoned as a child. Our mortality rate is 1.7 times higher, with 61 per cent of deaths before the age of 65.

These are some of the disparities that inform this powerful passage in the Uluru Statement from the Heart: “Proportionately, we are the most incarcerated people on the planet. We are not an innately criminal people. Our children are aliened from their families at unprecedented rates. This cannot be because we have no love for them. And our youth languish in detention in obscene numbers. They should be our hope for the future. These dimensions of our crisis tell plainly the structural nature of our problem. This is the torment of our powerlessness.”

This highlights two things. First, that we are a distinct group of Australians with a unique connection to our country and a rightful place that has yet to be recognised. And, second, that as a distinct group we have some distinct challenges.

I was a part of the constitutional dialogues, one of 12 around the country, in the lead-up to the endorsement of the Uluru statement. With about 100 fellow Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people at the dialogue in Palmerston near Darwin, with participants from the Northern Territory region north of Gurindji country to the Tiwi Islands, we discussed how Indigenous representative bodies, or voices, had been established many times in the past and always, on changes of governments, these bodies were defended or repealed.

We also learnt about the good work representative bodies did and how their problems, as all organisations will have from time to time, were amplified by hostile politicians. If the voice is only legislated, we know from past experience that we would be setting it up for silencing at the whim of a future government.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723375

File: 0bb5af21c933ddc⋯.jpg (261.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_child_holds_Aboriginal_a….jpg)

File: 1c8fbf2efdd823b⋯.jpg (138.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_Megan_Davis_Pa….jpg)

>>18723374

2/2

Another lesson that informs us of the need for a voice is to consider what happens when Indigenous people don’t have one. Soon after the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission was repealed, hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for vital community services was cut. Less money reached the people in the communities who needed it while more money made it in to the pockets of those who didn’t.

We saw the Racial Discrimination Act repealed as the Northern Territory intervention rolled an army of bureaucrats through remote Aboriginal communities at incredible expense. And we know today that for all of the extreme measures and the ongoing canvassing of Indigenous people’s failures, the policies imposed without a voice have made matters only worse.

What you see in Alice Springs today is a result of the failure of our democracy to hold politicians responsible for their decisions made in Indigenous affairs. Each time, Indigenous people have sounded alarm bells but nobody was listening. A voice to parliament will turn this around. The status quo will not. All sides of politics agree that decisions about Indigenous people should be made with them, not about them, for the best results. The difference is in how accountable the parliament and government should be to do it as a matter of course.

The Albanese government is taking up the practical approach pitched by Indigenous people from across the nation in the Uluru statement.

The Coalition is taking its own direction, one that has been proven to fail. The contradictions are clear for anyone ready to look past the outdated rhetoric. We should ask ourselves why the Coalition would want to avoid a constitutional change that merely provides Indigenous people with the certainty of a say – no right to veto, no third chamber in parliament. What do they think is wrong with greater transparency in Indigenous affairs? Why support a legislated voice that they can repeal, and not one established by the will of the Australian people?

We must beat the tactics of confusion being deployed by the No campaign. We should share with fellow Australians that at this referendum we will be considering a simple proposition: to recognise Indigenous Australians by accepting a generous offer to share their history and culture as part of who we are as a nation, and to do it in a way that provides the practical means to improve outcomes in Indigenous communities.

Thomas Mayo is a Kaurareg Aboriginal and Kalkalgal, Erubamle Torres Strait Islander man. He is a board member of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/torment-of-the-past-demands-voice-for-future-says-thomas-mayo/news-story/092614f6c1b6d9009f633af8c55a73a1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723387

File: e838c24a9afad78⋯.jpg (3.37 MB,5408x3605,5408:3605,Warren_Mundine_with_Senato….jpg)

File: 369fd59aec89bda⋯.jpg (1.38 MB,3439x2800,3439:2800,Australian_Institute_of_Ab….jpg)

>>18676743

OPINION: The Voice, as proposed, is flawed and insulting to First Nations

Nyunggai Warren Mundine, Activist and former politician - April 19, 2023

1/2

I am Australian. I’m a member of the Bundjalung First Nation of Australia, from my father’s side, and the Gumbaynggirr and Yuin First Nations of Australia from my mother’s side. And I oppose the Voice to parliament.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s proposed new chapter of the Constitution is stated to be “in recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia”.

This is not recognition of Australia’s First Nations. All it does is recognise Aboriginal people as a homogenous race. Race can sometimes be convenient descriptor. But it’s a flawed, and insulting, basis for recognising Australia’s First Peoples in the Constitution. And history shows it’s a fraught basis on which to differentiate people’s rights. Race and nationhood are different.

The Oxford Dictionary defines a “nation” as “a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular state or territory”. Indigenous Australians don’t have the same languages or cultures or histories or descent or territorial lands. Many people have seen the Indigenous Australia language map which illustrates the first language groups across the continent. Each different coloured area represents a distinct group united by unique descent, history, culture, and language, inhabiting a particular state or territory: a nation.

“Aboriginal” is a race. Bundjalung is a nation. Where does Albanese’s new chapter mention my Bundjalung, Gumbaynggirr or Yuin nations? It’s as if they don’t exist.

Albanese’s amendment assumes this Voice can speak as one with no contemplation of its members having differing opinions. This isn’t the case for other bodies mentioned in the Constitution, like the houses of parliament or the High Court, which have express provision or hundreds of years of precedent for how they make decisions and deal with dissent.

It’s as if this Voice has a singular consciousness; like the Borg from Star Trek. This is based on a false premise that Indigenous Australians are one homogenous group, and will constitutionally enshrine us as a single race of people, ignoring our unique first nations. It’s a step backwards.

A fundamental cultural principle of all Australia’s First Nations is that only Countrymen and women can speak for Country. Bundjalung people speak for Bundjalung Country. Gumbaynggirr people speak for Gumbaynggirr Country. Yuin people speak for Yuin Country. I used to live in Dubbo, but I’m not Wiradjuri. Now I live in Sydney, but I’m not Dharug. So I don’t speak for Wiradjuri or Dharug countries. My common ground with Wiradjuri and Dharug people is race. Not Country.

Albanese says the Voice will be based on the 2021 Indigenous Voice report by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton. The report proposed the Voice have 24 members: two appointed by the government, two from each state, territory and the Torres Strait, five from “remote” parts of Northern Territory, Western Australia, Queensland, South Australia and New South Wales, and one for Torres Strait Islanders living on the mainland. The report rejected direct election and said members of the “Local and Regional Voices” (community organisations) within each state and territory would “collectively determine” Voice members for their respective jurisdictions.

The regional boundaries for Voice representation won’t align with First Nations but will primarily align with state and territory boundaries – in other words, based on the way British colonists divided up the continent.

Aside from the chaos, confusion and conflict this will create in practice, it’s fundamentally flawed in principle. This Voice cannot speak for Country since it won’t represent one. I fear worse: that the Voice will purport to speak for Country without authority, undermining traditional owner rights.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723390

File: 26fb17f89e79671⋯.jpg (5.69 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Anthony_Albanese_makes_an_….jpg)

>>18723387

2/2

Starting with the federal Liberal government’s Land Rights Act in 1976, Australian governments in the 1970s and 1980s all passed land rights legislation. In 1992, the High Court recognised native title after which the government passed the Native Title Act. Today, anyone who wants to do business on lands or waters where native title or land rights exist needs to talk to the traditional owners of those lands and waters.

Traditional owners (like all humans) don’t always agree. There are governance structures and closely supervised rules for how traditional owners make decisions, but when the group makes a decision, there will invariably be some in the group who don’t agree.

I’ve written and spoken extensively about attempts to undermine traditional owner decisions about their own Country, particularly to approve projects on their lands and waters. We’ve seen groups with different agendas enlist minority dissenters in public relations campaigns. We’ve seen traditional owner groups held to a unanimous approval threshold that no other group of people in this country is held to. It will be much easier to undermine traditional owner autonomy by enlisting a Voice, with a constitutional right to make representations to government, to advocate against the wishes of traditional owners about their own countries.

If the Voice is enshrined in the Constitution, prescribed bodies corporate (representing native title claimant groups) and land councils (representing holders of land rights) will become just some of the many local community organisations in a vast region who’ll somehow collectively nominate a member of the Voice which, with its constitutional enshrined status, will have primacy. Their voices for their own Countries will be diluted and drowned out.

Don’t believe the spin. The Voice is not constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Nations. It will not – and cannot – represent First Nations and will more than likely be used as a tool to undermine them.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/the-voice-as-proposed-is-flawed-and-insulting-to-first-nations-20230418-p5d1g3.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723399

File: f30b12ffe735be5⋯.mp4 (9.06 MB,1280x544,40:17,NO_division_in_our_family_….mp4)

File: fe2ffbd190cc810⋯.jpg (103.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,NT_senator_Jacinta_Nampiji….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18713968

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Queensland Indigenous population key to No campaign

FIA WALSH - APRIL 19, 2023

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Queensland’s large Indigenous population could be key to carrying the state to a No vote in the voice to parliament referendum.

Days after being elevated to Peter Dutton’s front bench, the Northern Territory senator visited Queensland parliament on Wednesday to meet with Liberal National MPs, whose party is yet to officially adopt a position on the voice.

Queensland is shaping up as a crucial battleground in the referendum after an exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian this month showed it was the only state without majority support for enshrining a voice in the Constitution, with 49 per cent in favour and 43 per cent in the No camp.

The new opposition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman said a strong driver of the No position would be the state’s large Aboriginal population – Brisbane is host to the biggest number of First Nations people in the country, and Queensland has 18 discrete Indigenous communities.

“In a lot of those communities, the locals there feel like they’re not necessarily being listened to or they don’t know what the detail is,” Senator Price said.

“In Queensland, there are a lot of Aboriginal councils that already have elected Indigenous representation, people that know the issues on the ground and are working hard in their communities already … why would they then want an unelected individual to provide advice to them on issues that concern their community?”

Senator Price pointed to the remote northwest Queensland community of Doomadgee as a place where “really strong” voices opposed to the constitutional change “want to be heard”.

It comes a day after Noel Pearson attended a voice event at the parliament on Tuesday, where he implored the state LNP to support the referendum and said Queensland must be at the forefront of the Yes campaign.

Senator Price said Mr Pearson’s visit was because “he probably recognises that Queensland is more likely to support a No than a Yes”.

Cape York Land Council chairman Richie Ah Mat rejected claims that Aboriginal people living outside capital cities did not want the voice.

“For 26 years I have been chair of this organisation, I’ve lived with the grassroots and at the grassroot level.

“I know what they want,” he told a parliamentary inquiry in Cairns on Wednesday.

“They tell me what they want. I don’t tell them what is good for them, they tell me ‘Go and fight for us’.”

While voters in the NT – Ms Price’s jurisdiction – will count in the national tally, territories do not need to reach a majority for a referendum to pass.

Senator Price stopped short of calling for Queensland’s opposition to commit to a side in the referendum debate.

“Queensland LNP will come to their position when they’re prepared to come to a position, it’s for them to do,” she said.

State Attorney-General Shannon Fentiman was less equivocal, using Wednesday’s question time to accuse Opposition Leader David Crisafulli of “cynical political fence sitting”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/jacinta-nampijinpa-price-says-queensland-indigenous-population-key-to-no-campaign/news-story/5f5d550dcd94f667ec064e412ac1c323

https://www.facebook.com/fairgoforall/videos/791522342249454/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723408

File: c268a6711fecbef⋯.jpg (109.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: 2560c1bb76058e3⋯.jpg (492.07 KB,1240x828,310:207,The_elected_leaders_of_the….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18713968

Central Land Council attacks Jacinta Price over her commentary on Alice Springs crisis and stance on voice

PAIGE TAYLOR - APRIL 20, 2023

The land council representing Aboriginal people of Alice Springs and surrounding communities has attacked opposition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price over her commentary on the Alice Springs crisis and her stance on the voice, saying: “she needs to stop pretending we are her people”.

Yuendumu man Warren Williams, deputy chair of the council of 90 elected Aboriginal women and men from central Australia, was highly critical of the Alice Springs Senator in a media statement issued by the Central Land Council on Thursday.

The council is currently meeting at Spotted Tiger near Atitjere and issued its statement about Senator Price after what it described as her “continued attacks on land councils and other peak Aboriginal organisations”,

In March, Senator Price and Greens-turned-independent Senator Lidia Thorpe called for an inquiry into Aboriginal land councils.

“We are tired of her playing politics with grass roots organisations our old people built have built to advocate for our rights and interests,” Mr Williams said.

“Her people are the non-Aboriginal conservatives and the Canberra elite to which she wants to belong.”

“She should tell us what her grievances with the CLC are, and if she can really and truly listen to us she is welcome to attend our next council meeting.”

Mr Williams said the council was well aware of the scale of the challenges faced by Indigenous families in central Australia and welcomes anyone who was willing and able to work with them.

“We have many good men and women who are trying hard to make our communities better places, who are desperate to be heard, and Senator Price’s divisive approach isn’t helping,” Mr Williams said.

He said by generalising about Aboriginal people without any evidence and authority, Senator Price is hurting Aboriginal people.

“Our kids are the apples of our eyes,” Mr Williams said. “We are not abusers. We love our children. We’d like to know where she got her information from. It is mandatory to report such evidence to the authorities.

“We can do without self-appointed lone crusaders who are unable to bring people of good will together.”

In the council’s media release published on its website Thursday, Lajamanu community leader Valerie Patterson said Senator Price was misrepresenting the support for the voice in remote communities.

“I am a Warlpiri woman and I will vote yes because I believe that having the right to be heard by the parliament and the government will open a door for our children,” Ms Patterson said.

“Senator Price should support us, not tell lies about us.”

“The voice comes from the people,” Mr Williams said. “It’s a big opportunity for us. It opens everything up for us.

“There’s a lot of people who think the same thing. We want to go ahead with it. We will probably never have that chance again.” Mr Williams said Senator Price needs to educate herself about the views of Yapa [Warlpiri for Aboriginal people].

“We’ve never seen her on communities. She needs to get down to the grass roots and find out the truth, not just speak with the few people who will talk to her.”

A spokeswoman for Senator Price said she would not comment on the council’s media statement.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/central-land-council-attacks-jacinta-price-over-her-commentary-on-alice-springs-crisis-and-stance-on-voice/news-story/f43b655627bc88b3cdd35936f0e6a5be

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723421

File: a74446f470aef1d⋯.jpg (150.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Nicholas_Hasluck_pictred_i….jpg)

>>18676743

Indigenous voice 'will paralyse parliament'

PAIGE TAYLOR - 20 April 2023

A former Supreme Court judge predicts the Indigenous voice will paralyse the Australian parliament and "in many cases the approval of the advisory body will have to be obtained before a bill can be enacted".

Nicholas Hasluck KC, who retired from the West Australian Supreme Court in 2010, describes the proposal to entrench the Indigenous voice in the constitution as contrary to democratic ideals.

Mr Hasluck has long been well known in legal and political circles because of his judicial career and because he is the son of the late Sir Paul Hasluck, a minister in the Menzies government who later became governor general of Australia. In 2001, the Federal seat of Hasluck was created and named in honour of Sir Paul and his wife Dame Alexandra Hasluck, an author.

In his written submission to the joint select committee inquiry into the voice, Mr Hasluck criticises one of the justifications offered for the advisory body offered by Anthony Albanese. Mr Albanese has said consulting Indigenous people about matters that affect them is good manners.

"To say, as some have said in recent months, that the voice should be enshrined simply as a matter of ‘good manners’ is a shallow and misleading line of argument," Mr Hasluck writes in his submission to the voice Senate inquiry.

"It confuses the matters in issue by suggesting that people who vote against the voice lack the decency usually associated with good manners.

"An emotive plea of this kind seeks to shame people into voting for the voice. A profound change to the structure of government by constitutional amendments should only be made in response to well reasoned debate on both sides of the question."

Mr Hasluck says the proposal to make "a profound and essentially irreversible change to the structure of government by vesting an influential advisory privilege in a section of the community defined by race is contrary to democratic ideals reflected in the Constitution, a document underpinned by conventions referable to the rule of law and the notion that all citizens, high and low, are to be treated equally".

"As a matter of principle, the voice should be rejected on the grounds that our democracy is built on the foundation of all Australian citizens having equal civic rights, all being able to vote for, stand for and serve in either of the two chambers of our national parliament," Mr Hasluck writes.

"A constitutionally enshrined body defined by race, as to which only Indigenous Australians can vote for or serve in, is inconsistent with this fundamental principle."

Mr Hasluck said the voice would almost certainly become a lightning rod for protracted debate about a vast array of current issues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/politicsnow-labor-under-crossbench-pressure-on-cost-of-living/live-coverage/3b65d8c005ff105bd5b03d07028ad059#98734

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723436

File: 329cc2708b6b9af⋯.jpg (93.69 KB,1200x675,16:9,The_bold_proposal_to_host_….jpg)

File: a16df99b61b1d10⋯.jpg (261.62 KB,1200x1773,400:591,The_pitch_comes_after_Mr_M….jpg)

>>18719425

Mark McGowan’s China trade mission: WA Premier calls for National Cabinet to be held in Beijing

Caitlyn Rintoul - 20 April 2023

Premier Mark McGowan has called for National Cabinet to be held in China in an unprecedented pitch to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese aimed at rebuilding relations between the two nations.

The bold proposal to host all State and Territory leaders came on the second day of the Premier’s five-day trade mission in Beijing.

Mr Albanese has already said he’s “open to” visiting the Asian giant after speculation he had been invited to China in September.

“The Prime Minister, hopefully, will come to China sometime in the next six months and meet with President Xi Jinping,” Mr McGowan said. “One of the things he could do is, invite all the Premiers and Chief Ministers to come with him.”

In Perth this month, Mr Albanese praised delegations led by Mr McGowan, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews, and Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk to China.

Mr McGowan said State and Territory leaders would be an excellent addition to a PM-led trip for their “economic connection” strength.

Mr McGowan said a combined trip would allow Premiers to “fan out” to other Chinese provinces and cities for “relevant meetings and agreements”.

“It would be a strong demonstration that the relationship is back to a harmonious and productive one,” he said.

He said State-level visits focused on investment and working with individual partners, particularly “mining exports” and “attracting international students and tourists”.

“I think (they) would help smooth the pathway to removing any trade barriers and sanctions on Australian products,” he said.

The pitch comes after Mr McGowan told a critical Beijing business conference on Tuesday that he would use his visit to advocate for removing trade tariffs, which Beijing imposed on a range of commodities, including wine, barley, and lobsters.

In his speech to the China-Australia Chamber of Commerce event in front of 120 business high-flyers, he described the WA-China relationship as “incredibly strong”. He spruiked the importance of the Asian giant for local exporters.

“The new government’s got a far more balanced and sensible approach. I want to help with that in any way I can,” the Premier said.

“I just think it would be good if we all went together.

“It would help enhance our opportunities to sell new products to China, attract tourists and students, and ensure a more harmonious relationship in the region.”

https://thewest.com.au/politics/federal-politics/mark-mcgowans-china-trade-mission-wa-premier-calls-for-national-cabinet-to-be-held-in-beijing-c-10395957

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723446

File: 0a504f5a45bdfc7⋯.jpg (204.54 KB,1200x720,5:3,Western_Australian_Premier….jpg)

>>18719425

>>18723436

Calls for decoupling 'now in the past,' Western Australian Premier says, as Australia seeks to boost trade ties with China

Xiong Xinyi, Yu Jincui, and Xing Xiaojing - Apr 19, 2023

1/2

Premiers of Australian states have been visiting China in droves amid thawing bilateral relations, eyeing to further deepen trade and economic cooperation with its largest trading partner, while the ongoing visit of Western Australian Premier Mark McGowan being the latest representation despite some voices hyping about "decoupling."

In an interview with the Global Times on Wednesday, McGowan highlighted a strong and beneficial bilateral relationship, stressing the calls for "decoupling" "are now in the past" and now there is "an appetite for a better relationship with China" after the new federal government took office.

Experts expect a bottom-up push to continue boosting the warming relations while breaking more barriers following stepped-up efforts and engagement from local governments and enterprises in Australia. However, they also noted obstacles remain for the bilateral ties such as the US' meddling and the so-called AUKUS nuclear submarine pact, and that Canberra needs to drop its hostile approach for a pragmatic one.

Pragmatic calls from states

During McGowan's five-day trip to China that is the first in nearly four years, the delegation will meet senior Chinese officials such as the officials of the National Development and Reform Commission, China's top economic planning body, along with businesses and people interested in Western Australia and improving the relationship through various events, McGowan noted.

McGowan expects an outcome with the improvement in relationships and an understanding that investing in Western Australia and having a friendly relationship brings benefits for both countries.

Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews also concluded a four-day visit in March. He told reporters that the state's relationship with China goes "deeper than just trade," and that it is a "partnership built on respect, trust and friendship, and one that benefits all Victorians in every sector," the Xinhua News Agency reported.

Andrews noted that "after more than three years, we've met with Chinese leaders in sister provinces that are home to more than 170 million people, sending a message to China that Victoria is a fantastic place for Chinese people to visit and study," according to Xinhua.

In addition, Queensland's Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk may visit China in November.

Two-way merchandise trade totaled $58.79 billion in the first quarter of 2023, up 10.9 percent year-on-year, official data showed last week. As for trade between China and Western Australia, the Chinese mainland remains the top trading partner in 2021 to 2022 with A$143.6 billion ($96.19 billion) of goods traded and the largest market for the state's iron ore, accounting for 80 percent of its total exports during the period, according to official data.

McGowan noted that maintaining close economic and trade ties with China allows for enhanced construction and good agricultural products to be converted into quality food products.

He added that exports for products such as iron ore, gold, gas and other products to China have recovered compared to during the pandemic, while the government is working on restoring the exchange in tourism, airlines and international students.

For instance, the 5th strategic dialogue between China and Western Australia was held on Wednesday, involving senior business representatives from around 30 leading domestic enterprises like Sinoteel and Baosteel to discuss questions the enterprises might have.

Amid China's economic recovery this year, McGowan emphasized a strong cooperative and economic relationship, while expecting greater cooperation and investment in renewable energies, which can assist both countries' ambitions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In response to calls from Australia to "decouple from China," McGowan noted that "I don't support anyone who says we should decouple. I think the relationship is strong and beneficial to both countries… So in terms of any of those calls, I think they are now in the past."

He said that it is in everyone's interest to have a good relationship between Australia and China. "I think with the new federal government in Australia, there is an appetite for a better relationship with China," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723449

File: 90ab41288703592⋯.jpg (125.7 KB,1200x720,5:3,Western_Australia_wants_to….jpg)

>>18723446

2/2

As for some domestic noises seeking to hinder the warming relationship, such as some Australian media which constantly hype the possibility of war with China, McGowan believes that the landscape has improved a lot.

"Obviously, they are dangerous and inflammatory sentiments that those people were promoting. It appears to me that they have largely stopped. So I think it's improved and I expect it will continue to improve," he noted.

Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong recently told the press that "we think it is a good thing that we are engaging," when responding to a media question about the state leaders' China trips, Australian media outlet Skynews reported on Monday.

Further efforts needed

Despite some hostile voices and calls to "decouple from China" from some Australian politicians while under the shadow cast by the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal among the US, the UK and Australia, experts noted that local enterprises and governments are actively forging ahead in their relations with China amid lingering uncertainties, indicating their desire for and pragmatism toward a healthy relationship with China.

When Washington is attempting to hold its allies and partners hostage so they continue to act as pawns in the US' anti-China and containment strategies, local governments and enterprises in Australia have a clearer understanding than some Australian politicians, Chen Hong, president of the Chinese Association of Australian Studies, told the Global Times.

Chen noted that local governments and enterprises in Australia are actively forging ahead in their relations with China and taking the initiative to seek the best interests of their states, territories and enterprises, instead of ignoring their long-term interests and continuing working for Washington's hegemonic strategy.

For instance, a delegation of about 15 senior representatives of Australian companies and local government officials will make a six-day visit to China, the first of its kind in three years, starting on April 23.

China's Vice Minister of Agricultural and Rural Affairs Ma Youxiang met with Australian Agricultural Minister Murray Watt along with other government officials during his trip on Monday, aiming to promote bilateral cooperation in agriculture to get it back on a healthy and normal track.

McGowan noted that foreign affairs are a responsibility of the Commonwealth Government, but states have a lot of responsibility for economic, cultural, and social matters, noting that the engagement can assist in laying the ground for the Commonwealth Government which resolves issues at a national level with the Chinese government.

He said he would encourage other state premiers and governments to come to China as well and certainly encourage the Commonwealth Government of Australia to engage in that practice when it comes to enhancing the confidence of the local business community in the marketing environment and economic relations.

While bilateral relations are heading in a positive direction, Chen added that the Australia-US alliance remains the most important cornerstone for Australia's diplomatic and security strategy, adding that Canberra still faces pressure from the US to "pick a side" while hyping the so-called "China threat."

Chen called for more efforts for local governments in Australia to strengthen civil exchanges which are particularly critical especially when the federal government is affected by complex international relations factors and the top-down drive is insufficient.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202304/1289457.shtml

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202304/1289463.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723453

File: 8c348c5fef660d5⋯.jpg (2.09 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Australian_Foreign_Ministe….jpg)

In New Caledonia, Australia urges Pacific island unity amid China, U.S. competition

Kirsty Needham - April 20, 2023

SYDNEY, April 20 (Reuters) - Australia's foreign minister urged Pacific island countries on Thursday to stay united in the face of great power competition as she visited New Caledonia, where the president raised concerns about Australia's AUKUS nuclear submarine programme.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong's visit to the French territory coincides with a push by a China-backed group for several Pacific island nations, including New Caledonia, to sign a splinter security pact.

The region's main diplomatic bloc, the 18-member Pacific Islands Forum, which includes Australia, last year rejected a push by China for 10 nations to sign a security and trade deal amid concerns by the United States and its allies over Beijing's military ambitions.

Solomon Islands, the only Pacific island country with a security pact with China, is pushing for the Melanesian Spearhead Group of Vanuatu, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and New Caledonia's leading pro-independence party, to create a sub-regional security framework which would also involve Beijing, statements show.

In a speech to New Caledonia's Congress, Wong said the Pacific faced challenges from climate change, economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic and strategic competition, and "we believe a united Pacific Islands Forum is central to protecting our shared interests".

"We are stronger together," she said.

While New Caledonia is a French overseas territory, its president Louis Mapou, a pro-independence indigenous leader, is from the Kanak Socialist Liberation Front (FLNKS), a political alliance strongly tied to the Melanesian Spearhead Group, which was formed four decades ago to push for independence for indigenous Melanesian groups.

A spokesman for Mapou told Reuters that New Caledonia is negotiating to become an associate member of the MSG, and confirmed the security framework was being discussed among members.

"In terms of China's presence, the president has always said New Caledonia is open to discussions with any countries - China, Japan, United States," he said.

Mapou's spokesman said he had raised New Caledonia's concerns about whether AUKUS, a defence technology partnership with the United States and Britain to sell Australia nuclear-propelled submarines, complied with the Pacific's nuclear-free treaty in discussions with Wong. Wong responded saying Australia was transparent and the AUKUS submarines would carry only conventional weapons, he said.

Wong told reporters afterwards AUKUS would contribute to regional stability, and Australia complied with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea officials will discuss a MSG security framework on Thursday in Honiara, a Solomon Islands government statement said.

The top official for the group, whose headquarters in Vanuatu was funded by Beijing, has previously said Chinese security assistance would also be considered and China would become a development partner.

Britain's Foreign Secretary James Cleverly, who arrived in Solomon Islands on Wednesday after visiting Papua New Guinea, wrote in a tweet: "The security of the Pacific region affects us all".

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/new-caledonia-australia-urges-pacific-island-unity-amid-china-us-competition-2023-04-20/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723461

File: 99496ac2160e60a⋯.jpg (114.51 KB,1240x826,620:413,ASIO_boss_Mike_Burgess_war….jpg)

File: e5d2ab2968aa5c6⋯.jpg (660.89 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0001.jpg)

File: cef38b1de7b4962⋯.jpg (681.2 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0002.jpg)

File: 95087586e6b6d93⋯.jpg (724.35 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0003.jpg)

>>18600044 (pb)

Foreign spies are aggressively seeking ‘disloyal’ insiders with access to Australia’s secrets, ASIO warns

Intelligence agency wants government security clearance system ‘hardened’ to protect sensitive information

Daniel Hurst - 20 Apr 2023

1/2

Foreign spies are “aggressively seeking secrets across all parts of Australian society”, including trying to recruit “disloyal” government insiders to access classified information, ASIO has warned.

The intelligence agency said “hostile foreign powers and their proxies” were seeking to test the Australian government’s security clearance system.

In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry, ASIO argued in favour of legal changes to enable the agency to become centrally responsible for issuing the highest level of security clearances in Australia.

ASIO used the submission to give an updated assessment of the threat environment, saying foreign spies were “targeting our security clearance holders, those with access to Australia’s most privileged information, capabilities and secrets”.

It said these attempts posed a threat to Australian government personnel across parliament, commonwealth employees, the Australian public service, Defence and even the judiciary.

ASIO said hostile foreign powers and their proxies “will continually seek to test the clearance system, seeking to put in place disloyal persons with access to classified and privileged information”.

It said the security clearance system needed to be “hardened” otherwise the secrets of Australia and its closest allies could be put at risk.

“Whether it is information from Australia’s intelligence community or our Five Eyes partners, about Australia’s groundbreaking nuclear-powered submarines program with US and UK partners, or other advanced defence and intelligence capabilities, Australia’s sovereignty demands that Australia’s most sensitive information, capabilities and secrets be protected.”

The submission reiterated what the ASIO boss, Mike Burgess, said in his annual threat assessment speech: that Aukus has spurred “a distinct uptick in the online targeting of people working in Australia’s defence industry”.

A bill introduced to parliament last month would make ASIO centrally responsible for issuing – and then checking whether employees continue to be suitable for – the highest level security clearances.

The existing Positive Vetting (PV) security clearance will be replaced by a new one, Top Secret-Privileged Access (TS-PA).

ASIO said these security clearances would be governed by a new, classified standard with “stronger minimum mandatory security clearance requirements reflecting contemporary psychological and insider threat research”.

The parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security is reviewing the proposed changes.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723464

File: 1295a3ad2c89c6c⋯.jpg (740.85 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0004.jpg)

File: 08f85994a668cb9⋯.jpg (766.64 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0005.jpg)

File: f8a22e7c9cc0034⋯.jpg (762.32 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0006.jpg)

File: 6aa45a5406aa9bf⋯.jpg (715.18 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0007.jpg)

>>18723461

2/2

The reforms are driven, in part, by the need to have a “transferable highest-cleared workforce” resistant to espionage and foreign interference, according to ASIO’s submission to the committee.

At the moment, five separate vetting agencies are authorised to grant PV security clearances, resulting in “barriers” and “delays” when high-cleared officials want to transfer to a different government agency.

The new legislation includes some rights for applicants to seek a review of adverse decisions, although ASIO said there were some limitations on these rights because of the “likelihood” that hostile foreign powers would “use any review rights for the purpose of intelligence collection”.

The submission said spies and their proxies may try to discover the “extent and content of ASIO intelligence holdings, which may allow a foreign adversary to at least partially reverse engineer the nature and extent of the TS-PA security clearance process”.

They might also attempt to find out about any “ongoing intelligence coverage of associates of the applicant, disclosure of which could prejudice security”.

ASIO said hostile foreign powers and their proxies “would be able to use this understanding to ‘game the system’ – that is, to send applicants to apply for, and gain, TS-PA security clearances to then infiltrate Australian government agencies providing access to the highest levels of Australian, and allied, information, capabilities and secrets”.

The changes come at a time when the US has been embarrassed by the leak of classified defence documents that laid bare military secrets and upset Washington’s relations with key allies. Last week a 21-year-old air national guardsman in Massachusetts was arrested in connection with those allegations.

In a separate case an Australian businessman was arrested and charged in Sydney on Friday. The 55-year-old is accused of accepting money from two suspected Chinese spies in exchange for reports on Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements while he worked in China.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/20/foreign-spies-are-aggressively-seeking-disloyal-insiders-with-access-to-australias-secrets-asio-warns

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/ASIOBill2023

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723495

File: 66b5b5702e41270⋯.mp4 (14.05 MB,640x360,16:9,Lidia_Thorpe_s_father_spea….mp4)

File: 310a116c272e610⋯.jpg (114.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lidia_Thorpe_compared_her_….jpg)

File: a8dea410620cb12⋯.jpg (73.17 KB,768x768,1:1,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_outsi….jpg)

File: 2c3de2e9c7bd7e4⋯.jpg (166.87 KB,801x979,9:11,FuIr3OvaYAAFPHd.jpg)

>>18708643

Anthony Albanese in ‘racist and misogynistic’ bid to silence me: Lidia Thorpe

JESS MALCOLM - APRIL 20, 2023

Lidia Thorpe says Anthony Albanese’s suggestion she should “get some help” is a “continuation of a racist and misogynistic narrative” used to silence Indigenous people.

The independent Indigenous senator also claimed she was “harassed by racists” last Sunday when she was filmed leaving a strip club at 3am, and the media had mischaracterised the incident.

Senator Thorpe has been embroiled in controversy after she was captured on video yelling profanities and accusing men of having small penises while she was leaving a Brunswick strip club while celebrating a friend’s 50th birthday.

Senator Thorpe was banned from the club for life after footage showing her shouting obscenities was broadcast by the media.

“On Saturday night I was provoked and stood up for myself,” Senator Thorpe said in statement on Thursday. “No one was hurt. The story should be about the racists brazenly harassing a senator. The story is that I can’t go out without being harassed by racists. This is the racism Blak people deal with everyday in this colony.”

The comments come after the Prime Minister condemned her behaviour and expressed concern she may have health issues, with Mr Albanese telling 2SM radio her recent disruptive behaviour had become a trend.

Senator Thorpe claimed to have been “pulverised” by police in March after she attempted to disrupt a rally at Parliament House. She also tried to block Sydney’s Mardi Gras Parade by lying on the ground in front of a float.

“I hope that Lidia gets some support. I think that level of behaviour is quite clearly unacceptable. And I think there are obvious issues that need to be dealt with in terms of her health issues. These are not the actions of anyone who should be participating in society in a normal way, let alone a senator,” Mr Albanese told 2SM.

“And Lidia needs to be very conscious of the way in which this behaviour has been seen. They are repeat exercises now.”

Senator Thorpe also compared her experience “standing up to racism” to AFL great Adam Goodes and former Collingwood player Héritier Lumumba.

“There is a history of white men in power using the media to attack and demonise Blak people that stand up to racism,” Senator Thorpe said.

“They did the same thing to Adam Goodes and Heritier Lumumba when they called out racism. Saying I need ‘mental help’ is a continuation of the old racist and misogynistic narrative used to discredit and silence outspoken and strong women, particularly Blak women.”

But Senator Thorpe’s father Roy Illingworth on Thursday said she was “a very racist person against white people” and thought she had been swept up in power since the election.

“I think she‘s a very racist person against white people,” Mr Illingworth told Sky News.

“Normally she never used to be like that … maybe the power has gone to her head I don’t know.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-in-racist-and-misogynistic-bid-to-silence-me-lidia-thorpe/news-story/f42e77205cf67b249f946a2ccf6fd280

https://twitter.com/JoshButler/status/1648928785654484993

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723515

File: 305994b75657548⋯.jpg (184.29 KB,1280x722,640:361,Brittany_Higgins_and_partn….jpg)

>>18708667

Man charged over threatening to kill Brittany Higgins, David Sharaz and their pet cavoodle

REMY VARGA - APRIL 20, 2023

A NSW man has been charged after allegedly threatening to kill Brittany Higgins, her fiance and their pet cavoodle over social media.

David William Wonnocot, 49, allegedly told Ms Higgins’ partner David Sharaz he would “kill you both when you least expect it” and that he was planning to “chop Kingston [pet dog] up into little pieces”, according to messages seen by The Australian.

Mr Wonnocot also allegedly told Mr Sharaz that he would follow him and Ms Higgins home and “destroy you all”.

Terrorism squad detectives arrested the man at 10am on Wednesday in Tweed Heads on the NSW north coast and charged him with using a carriage service to make threats to kill and menace, harass and offend.

Police raided Mr Wonnocot’s home and vehicle in Banora Point and served him with a firearms ban.

A NSW Police spokesperson said the messages regarding Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz were uncovered during an investigation into threats of violence made on social media about participants of a mass gathering.

“During the investigation, detectives uncovered a total of 49 messages with similar threats or offensive content sent from a number of accounts, which were believed to be linked,” said the spokesperson.

“Further inquiries revealed one of the accounts was also linked to messages sent on social media to a man in the ACT, allegedly threatening to kill the man, his partner, and their pet dog.”

The police spokesperson said Mr Wonnocot been released on strict conditional bail and said there was no current or impending threat to the community.

He will appear before Tweed Heads Local Court on May 31.

Ms Higgins rose to prominence after publicly alleging her former colleague Bruce Lehrmann raped her on the office couch of then cabinet minister Linda Reynolds in the early hours of March 23 in 2019 after a night out drinking.

A highly publicised trial against Mr Lehrmann on charges of rape, who has consistently denied the allegations, was aborted in October last year due to juror misconduct.

Prosecutor Shane Drumgold declined to pursue a second trial against Mr Lehrmann citing concerns for Ms Higgins’ mental health.

An inquiry into the investigation into Mr Lehrmann and the handling of Ms Higgins’ allegations began on Monday.

Mr Sharaz and a spokeswoman for Ms Higgins were approached for comment.

Ms Higgins said she was grateful for the work of NSW Police in a post on Instagram. “Online harassment and death threats are never okay,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/man-charged-over-threatening-to-kill-brittany-higgins-david-sharaz-and-their-pet-cavoodle/news-story/124851bd95c3676d797ffe4fe1284df0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723554

File: 39488364b158669⋯.jpg (266.33 KB,1280x720,16:9,Kevin_Rudd_pictured_with_w….jpg)

File: 7809ff7025c03b1⋯.jpg (207.73 KB,768x1024,3:4,Kevin_Rudd_outside_the_Nat….jpg)

File: 0e8907e5e59e617⋯.jpg (487.21 KB,825x941,825:941,KR_15.jpg)

File: e34875ea51201cb⋯.jpg (185.37 KB,852x348,71:29,Q_2576.jpg)

Kevin Rudd downplays backlash over attacks on Donald Trump, meets Joe Biden

ADAM CREIGHTON - APRIL 20, 2023

Kevin Rudd has brushed aside concerns his past attacks on Donald Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president, will hinder Australia’s relationship with the US or Republicans in a short press conference in Washington DC after presenting his credentials to Joe Biden.

Former prime minister Mr Rudd – announced as the next Australian ambassador by Prime Minster Anthony Albanese in December after months of speculation – said he and his wife, Therese, had had a “good conversation” with Mr Biden in the Oval Office of the White House, stressing the President’s “personal warmth” and his “great relationship” with Mr Albanese.

“Therese and I had a great time in the White House, catching up with other friends on staff who we’ve known for more years than we can remember,” Mr Rudd told journalists, assembled in Lafayette Park opposite the White House, adding it was a “great honour to present his credentials”.

“The most important thing is he’s really looking forward to getting to Australia, and we’re looking forward to welcoming him in next few months,” he added, flanked by Therese on a Wednesday afternoon (Thursday AEST).

Mr Biden is expected to visit Australia for the first time as President in coming months for a Quad leaders meeting.

Asked whether his previous harsh criticisms of former president Trump, who has surged in US opinion polls since Mr Rudd’s appointment, would affect Australia’s relationship with the US, Mr Rudd said he was “pretty confident [his] relationships [with the US] have not only continued but been sustained and strengthened”.

“The bottom line is I’ve been in this town on and off for 30 years, I have bucketloads of Republican friends and bucketloads of Democrat friends, working in foreign policy and national security,” he added.

Mr Rudd had unleashed on Mr Trump repeatedly in public, calling him a “a traitor to the West”, guilty of “rancid treachery” as recently as February last year.

The former Labor leader and twice prime minster said he discussed the challenges in “maintaining strategic stability” in the Indo-Pacific in the face of a more assertive China with Mr Biden, whose relations with the US, he noted, had deteriorated, and AUKUS, which the former prime minister stressed had “bipartisan support” in Australia, the US and UK.

“Another thing was climate change, and energy security, and the economic opportunity available to Australia in this dynamic relationship: these areas are long standing passions and interest of mine.

Asked whether he had brought up Julian Assange’s plight in the meeting, Mr Rudd said he was “concerned about practical business of how we bring this matter to conclusion”.

“The first thing to say is both the PM and foreign minister have been pretty clear about their position on this matter, it’s gone on for too long, and that’s a position which of course I support”.

Mr Rudd, who was leader of a group calling for a royal commission into News Corp, publisher of The Australian, and media diversity, declined to comment on recent news that Fox News had settled with Dominion, referring journalists to Malcolm Turnbull for comments.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/kevin-rudd-downplays-backlash-over-attacks-on-donald-trump-meets-joe-biden/news-story/4fdfdb89c8fdb12f5ac4895e1392cbad

Kevin Rudd Tweet

Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery.

https://twitter.com/MrKRudd/status/1497863031497564161

https://archive.ph/gbMyl

Trump defends praise of Putin, makes strongest hint yet of a run for president in 2024

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/26/trump-2024/

Q Post #2576

Dec 10 2018 15:24:28 (EST)

https://twitter.com/SamanthaJPower/status/1071755419499069441

Those with the most to lose are the loudest.

Those who 'knowingly' broke the law in a coordinated effort [treason] are the most vocal.

Crimes against Humanity.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#2576

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723589

File: 7e79d4475c2a423⋯.mp4 (10.21 MB,1024x576,16:9,American_FA_18_Hornet_refu….mp4)

File: 8412eb77ae93b20⋯.jpg (172.13 KB,768x1024,3:4,Australian_Army_soldiers_s….jpg)

File: 01dbb00f2f222ea⋯.jpg (73.66 KB,1024x768,4:3,High_Mobility_Artillery_Ro….jpg)

>>18698909

Exercise Talisman Sabre: Dates released for Australia’s largest military training activity with US

US ships, fighter jets and thousands of armed forces personnel to converge on Queensland for Australia’s largest biennial military training operation.

Jodie Munro O'Brien - April 5, 2023

1/2

Dates have been released for the 10th iteration of Australia’s largest bilateral combined military training activity with the US.

More than 30,000 military personnel, mostly from the Australian Defence Force and US Armed Forces, are expected to converge on Queensland, parts of northern NSW and Darwin from June to early August for Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 (TS23), a large-scale military training activity that culminates in a mock war between all military branches on land, sea and in the air.

The peak of the training, which also incorporates crews in fighter jets and aircraft carrier ships, is scheduled to take place between July 21 and August 4.

An Australian Department of Defence spokeswoman said Australia and the US take turns leading the biennial military exercise, with the most recent iterations increasingly including other allied forces as participants or observers.

“Exercise Talisman Sabre is a bilateral, high-intensity war-fighting training activity led by Australia or the United States, and other partners which has previously included Japan and New Zealand. It is designed to enhance interoperability, strengthen the Australian-US Alliance, enhance Defence co-operation with like-minded countries in the region, and improve combat readiness,” she said.

The Defence spokeswoman said planning was still underway, but TS23 would comprise a field training exercise incorporating force preparation (logistics) activities, amphibious landings, ground force manoeuvres, urban close combat operations, and air combat and maritime operations.

Between 17,000 to 34,000 soldiers, sailors, Marines, airmen and women from around the world have participated in past years.

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2021 saw troops from New Zealand, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea and the United Kingdom embedded with the Australian and US forces, while military officers from France, Germany, India, and Indonesia observed the training.

This year, military units from more than 12 other allied nations will take part, including from Fiji, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, France, the UK, Canada and Germany.

Personnel from the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand will attend as observers.

Talisman Sabre 2023 will run from 22 July to 4 August primarily in Queensland but also in Western Australia, the Northern Territory and New South Wales.

The 14-day exercise will include large scale logistics, multi-domain firepower demonstrations, land combat, amphibious landings and air operations.

The “high end” warfighting scenarios are mostly conducted throughout the ADF’s 454,500 hectare Shoalwater Bay training area in Byfield, about 80km north of Rockhampton in Central Queensland, as well as in adjacent maritime and airspace areas of the Coral Sea.

Components of TS21 also took place in Hughenden, Atherton, Mareeba, Cairns, Townsville, the Charters Towers and Ingham regions, as well as along or off the coastal areas of Bundaberg, Bowen, Proserpine, Lucinda, Forest Beach, the ADF Cowley Beach Training Area near Innisfail and the Stanage Bay peninsula, northeast of Rockhampton.

Pilots of fighter jets, attack helicopters and other military aircraft also operated out of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) base Scherger near Weipa in the Cape York Peninsula, RAAF Base Amberley, outside of Ipswich in southeast Queensland, and the RAAF Evans Head Air Weapons Range in NSW.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18723593

File: 78cd6d10198f8d1⋯.jpg (262.41 KB,1024x768,4:3,United_States_Army_soldier….jpg)

File: 5a1c73f4ddba0bf⋯.jpg (46.21 KB,768x1024,3:4,Australian_Army_soldiers_f….jpg)

File: cf2324491cbc02a⋯.jpg (228.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_USS_Wasp_off_the_coast….jpg)

File: 97ed4574166b039⋯.jpg (138.05 KB,1024x768,4:3,Action_aboard_the_USS_Kitt….jpg)

>>18723589

2/2

The aim of Exercise Talisman Sabre is to train respective military force elements in planning and conducting Combined Task Force operations to improve the combat readiness and interoperability between the ADF and its allies, according to the Australian Army web site.

“It is a major combined … and joint … exercise involving thousands of troops on land, sea and in the air and major assets such as Australian and allied warships, fighters, bombers, helicopters and armour and artillery,” it states.

“This exercise is a major undertaking that reflects the closeness of our alliance and the strength of the ongoing military-military relationship and forms part of the ADF’s extensive training program to ensure it is prepared to protect and support Australia and its national interests.

“The exercise also contributes to the ability of Australian and US military forces to work together efficiently and safely.”

The initial Talisman Sabre in 2005 comprised 17,500 Americans and Australians with 27,500 personnel involved in the 2007 exercise.

More than 34,000 military personnel converged on the Sunshine state for Talisman Sabre 2019 – up from an originally anticipated 25,000 – along with more than 20 military ships, making it the nation’s largest joint US-Australian military exercise ever held, even piquing the interest of a Chinese spy ship for the second time.

The ADF are yet to confirm how many ships are participating this year, but several US and Japanese war ships have joined Talisman Sabre in prior years.

The global Covid-19 pandemic and Australia’s then-ongoing coronavirus restrictions altered the way some of the ninth iteration was run in 2021, including reducing the number of participants to 17,000, with more than 8000 from the ADF.

Some of the restrictions that year included international military personnel being required to first complete a fortnight of hotel quarantine, with those serving on foreign ships not allowed to come ashore.

With personnel from almost every aspect of each military branch expected to participate, separate lead up training to TS23 has already started in some areas of Australia and within the US.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/dates-released-for-australias-largest-bilateral-combined-military-training-activity-with-us/news-story/3d4334b26af5afd3d76707580d81175e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18728969

File: 7615e0880bae8e5⋯.mp4 (9.74 MB,640x360,16:9,Support_for_Indigenous_Voi….mp4)

File: ee63bf8bdd45893⋯.jpg (140.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Support_for_the_Voice_to_P….jpg)

File: 10429a8ff8045b3⋯.jpg (320.16 KB,971x668,971:668,Support_for_a_Voice_to_Par….jpg)

>>18676743

Majority of voters in Queensland and South Australia oppose Voice to Parliament as support falls across all jurisdictions, according to Roy Morgan poll

Support for the Voice to Parliament has fallen across all six states, with a new poll suggesting two jurisdictions showing a majority would vote "no" at the referendum later this year.

David Wu - April 21, 2023

Support for the Voice to Parliament has fallen across all six Australian states, with only one jurisdiction showing a majority would vote "Yes" in the referendum.

New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania recorded single to double figure falls, according to the Roy Morgan poll.

The largest drop in support was in Tasmania, with backing for the independent advisory body falling a massive 30 points down to 38 per cent.

The lowest dip was in Victoria where a three per cent fall was reported.

The survey also suggested if Australians were to cast their vote in the referendum today, only one state would vote in majority to support the Voice.

Victoria is the only jurisdiction with more than 50 per cent of its respondents backing the body, which would advise parliament and federal government on Indigenous policy.

NSW (46 per cent), WA (46 per cent), Queensland (41 per cent), SA (39 per cent) and Tasmania (38 per cent) would fail to reach a majority.

All jurisdictions would have to vote in favour for the Voice to be enshrined into the constitution, a key element of the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

The six states also saw an increase in "No" voters, with the largest jump coming from SA (17 per cent) and WA (15 per cent).

NSW (9 per cent), Tasmania (9 per cent), Queensland (8 per cent) and Victoria (3 per cent) all saw minor rises and could play a major factor in the referendum.

The results, compared to December's poll, showed SA and Queensland have more voters opposed to the Voice than in favour, with 50 and 46 per cent respectively.

Overall, 46 per cent (down 7 per cent from December) of Australians would vote "Yes", while 39 per cent would vote "No" (up 9 points).

A further 15 per cent (down 2 per cent) remain undecided.

The poll noted if the undecided voters were split between "Yes" and "No", then 54 per cent would be in favour of the advisory body.

But it also flagged from "past experience" that more people in the undecided camp tend to oppose rather than be in support when it came time to vote.

"This trend has been observed even over the last few months as ALP and Greens supporters who were ‘Undecided’ have been far more likely to move to the ‘No’ vote rather than becoming a ‘Yes’ vote," Roy Morgan said in its press release.

The survey had a smaller polling sample compared to the Newspoll results from The Australian earlier this month, which showed all states were in support.

The Roy Morgan poll was conducted via SMS which asked 1,181 Australians of their thoughts on the Voice between April 14 to April 18.

It was conducted before the Coalition revealed its ministry reshuffle this week where Senator Jacinta Price was announced as the new shadow minister for Indigenous Australians after Julian Leeser resigned over his party's Voice stance.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/majority-of-voters-in-queensland-and-south-australia-oppose-voice-to-parliament-as-support-falls-across-all-jurisdictions-according-to-roy-morgan-poll/news-story/8cb7215e465f87940ef25cadb4bcf681

https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/support-for-the-voice-drops-to-46-of-australians-down-7-points-since-december-2022-as-liberals-vow-to-oppose

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18728985

File: 7c30ce3d0032dc5⋯.jpg (2.31 MB,2413x3000,2413:3000,Solicitor_general_Stephen_….jpg)

>>18676743

Voice to Parliament would be an 'enhancement' to constitution, according to solicitor-general

Matthew Doran - 21 April 2023

The government’s top lawyer insists the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament would "enhance" Australia's system of government, arguing he does not believe it would "pose any threat" to the nation's parliamentary democracy.

Solicitor-general Stephen Donaghue KC has also dismissed suggestions the creation of the advisory body, enshrined in the constitution, would lead to a deluge of legal challenges.

Dr Donaghue's legal opinion was released as part of federal parliament's inquiry into the proposed wording of the referendum question and proposed constitutional amendment.

It is dated April 19, 2023, almost one month after the prime minister revealed the government’s final position on the Voice referendum proposal.

The federal opposition has been demanding the solicitor-general’s advice to cabinet, provided during the drafting process, be published.

That advice has not been provided to the committee.

The opinion picks apart the proposed section 129 of the constitution, which would be inserted into the nation's founding document if the referendum is successful later this year.

"A core rationale underpinning the proposed amendment is to facilitate more effective input by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in public discussion and debate about governmental and political matters relating to them," Dr Donaghue wrote earlier this week.

"Insofar as the Voice serves the objective of overcoming barriers that have historically impeded effective participation by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in political discussions and decisions that affect them, it seeks to rectify a distortion in the existing system.

"In my opinion proposed s 129 is not just compatible with the system of representative and responsible government prescribed by the Constitution, but an enhancement of that system."

Dr Donaghue rejected concerns the High Court's workload would increase exponentially if the Voice to Parliament's advice was ignored.

"The suggestion that a consequence of empowering the Voice to make representations to the Executive Government will be to clog up the courts, or to cause government to grind to a halt, ignores the reality that litigation concerning the validity of decisions of the Executive Government is already very common, and that it does not have either of those consequences," Dr Donaghue wrote.

"Accordingly, even if proposed s 129(iii) did not empower the Parliament to legislate to specify the legal effect of representations of the Voice (which in my view it clearly does), proposed s 129 would not pose any threat to Australia's system of representative and responsible government."

The prime minister said Dr Donaghue’s comments showed the proposal was "legally sound".

"This puts to bed the absolute nonsense of Peter Dutton and Barnaby Joyce and all the nonsense that they’ve carried on with, saying that somehow recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in our constitution will lead to ANZAC Day being abolished," Anthony Albanese said.

"It is complete nonsense. They are just determined to play politics with this."

Coalition adamant PM must publish original advice

Opposition frontbencher Simon Birmingham said the government would be better off releasing the solicitor-general's formal advice to government, rather than opinion crafted for release.

"It would give far greater weight and credibility for the government to provide all of the advice," Senator Birmingham said.

"And if all of the advice backs their case, then that of course, would be a stronger position for the government to stand on."

Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce said the government had been comfortable to release advice by the solicitor-general related to former prime minister Scott Morrison's secretly obtained ministry powers, and not doing so with the Voice was "sneaky".

"This is not the baby in the bassinet that was born, this is a different one," Mr Joyce said.

"What he's offered is a sort of amended, redacted version from later on, this is not the advice he was given, and if he wants to be straight with the Australian people then give us what we actually asked for, which is the original advice.

"When he offers something else it raises our suspicions further."

Mr Albanese confirmed Dr Donaghue’s opinion had been prepared for the parliamentary committee, and was not the solicitor-general’s legal advice presented to his cabinet prior to the wording being released.

"We don’t release, nor does any government ever release, advice to cabinet," the prime minister said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-21/voice-to-parliament-legally-sound-says-solicitor-general/102250768

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18729066

File: 1b858602bf9e8e0⋯.jpg (548.57 KB,825x1050,11:14,WL_4.jpg)

File: 86ee51d82efee53⋯.jpg (2.39 MB,2250x1500,3:2,FuL5YVuacAA85Jb.jpg)

>>18676828

>>18676832

WikiLeaks Tweet

Imprisoned WikiLeaks publisher and journalist Julian Assange's father and brother meet with the President of Mexico who reaffirms his support for the publishers' immediate release following renewed calls by parliamentarians worldwide | @lopezobrador_

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1649202232154259456

Andrés Manuel @lopezobrador_

Recibí a John y Gabriel Shipton, papá y hermano, respectivamente, de Julian Assange, a quien seguiremos defendiendo, pues es un preso político y su caso es un inaceptable agravio a la libertad de expresión.

Google Translation:

I received John and Gabriel Shipton, father and brother, respectively, of Julian Assange, whom we will continue to defend, since he is a political prisoner and his case is an unacceptable insult to freedom of expression.

https://twitter.com/lopezobrador_/status/1649154963803897858

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18729080

File: e6feba431876660⋯.jpg (2.53 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18670782

>>18687384

Albanese to attend NATO summit

Matthew Knott - April 21, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has agreed to attend the NATO summit in Lithuania in July after coming under criticism when it appeared he would skip the high-powered gathering.

International support for Ukraine’s war against Russia will be high on the agenda at the summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, that will be held on July 11 and 12.

Albanese attended last year’s NATO summit at the invitation of host country Spain, but The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age reported he did not intend to attend this year’s summit, in part because of a packed schedule of travel including the coronation of King Charles III in London next month.

A spokeswoman for Albanese on Friday confirmed Albanese would attend the summit.

“Australia shares with NATO members a commitment to supporting democracy, peace and security, and upholding the rule of law,” she said.

“The Prime Minister’s attendance at this year’s NATO leaders’ summit will be an important opportunity to reinforce Australia’s support for these global norms, demonstrate solidarity in response to Russia’s illegal and immoral invasion of Ukraine, and advocate for Australia’s economic, climate and trade agenda.”

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham welcomed Albanese’s decision to attend the summit, saying: “In what should have been an obvious and swift yes to the invitation, the Prime Minister finally has acknowledged the importance of this event and agreed to make time for it.

“Prime Minister Albanese should aim to have Australia embedded as a permanent ongoing participant in NATO dialogue and discussion, thereby ensuring continued focus on Indo-Pacific security.

“Not only should the Prime Minister be attending this summit with an agenda, he should be arriving with a new and comprehensive package to support the defence of Ukraine.”

Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia Vasyl Myroshnychenko also urged Albanese to attend the event.

All members of the so-called AP4 - Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand - have been invited to attend the summit even though they are not NATO members.

In late May Albanese will host US President Joe Biden, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida for the “Quad” leaders’ meeting in Sydney, the first time the event has been held in Australia.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-bows-to-pressure-to-attend-nato-summit-20230421-p5d2ad.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18729094

File: f94f614f1162a7d⋯.jpg (2.21 MB,3625x2416,3625:2416,Lachlan_Murdoch_s_lawyer_s….jpg)

File: fef08a6f2f221e1⋯.jpg (1.38 MB,4828x3219,4828:3219,Lachlan_Murdoch_had_claime….jpg)

>>18682176

Lachlan Murdoch drops defamation case against Crikey publisher

Heath Parkes-Hupton - 21 April 2023

Fox Corporation chief Lachlan Murdoch has dropped his defamation proceedings against the publisher of online news outlet Crikey and several of its editors and executives.

Mr Murdoch sued Private Media in the Federal Court in August over an article published by Crikey, claiming it defamed him in referring to his family as "unindicted co-conspirators" in the US Capitol riots.

On Friday his lawyers filed a notice to discontinue the case.

It comes days after Fox settled a defamation case in the US brought by Dominion Voting Systems, for $1.17 billion.

In a statement today, Mr Murdoch's lawyer John Churchill said his client remained confident the court would "ultimately find in his favour" but no longer wished to allow Crikey to use the case to "facilitate a marketing campaign" to boost subscribers.

In response, Private Media's chief executive Will Hayward claimed victory, saying Mr Murdoch's decision amounted to a "substantial victory for legitimate public interest journalism".

"We stand by what we published last June, and everything we laid out in our defence to the court. The imputations drawn by Murdoch from that article were ridiculous."

Mr Hayward was named as a respondent in the case, along with Crikey's former editor-in-chief Peter Fray, political editor Bernard Keane — who wrote the article — and Private Media chairman Eric Beecher.

'This is a victory for free speech'

In its most recent defence, filed this month, Private Media alleged Mr Murdoch was "morally and ethically culpable" for the January 6 attack on the US Capitol.

It claimed Fox News, under Mr Murdoch's management, "promoted and peddled [Donald] Trump's lie of the stolen election despite Lachlan Murdoch knowing it was false".

Mr Hayward said the publisher stood by the claims Mr Murdoch "and his father, had the power to stop the lies" and pointed to the outcome of the Dominion case.

"The fact is, Murdoch sued us, and then dropped his case.

"We are proud of our stand. We are proud to have exposed the hypocrisy and abuse of power of a media billionaire. This is a victory for free speech. We won."

Mr Murdoch's statement said Crikey had tried to introduce "thousands of pages of documents" unearthed during the Dominion case.

That case centred on allegations Fox News damaged Dominion's brand by spreading false claims of voter fraud after the 2020 US election.

"In that case, in the US state of Delaware, the trial judge ruled the events of January 6, 2021, in the US Capitol, were not relevant," Mr Churchill said.

"Further, the plaintiff Dominion Voting Systems made clear it would not argue that Fox News caused the events of January 6, and at no point did it ever argue that Mr Murdoch was personally responsible for the events of January 6.

"Yet this is what Crikey's article alleged and what Crikey is attempting to argue in Australia."

Private Media had maintained in court that the story was not defamatory, and that its contents were in the public interest.

Crikey had engaged public relations firm

The article was first published on June 29 and taken down the next day after the receipt of a concerns notice from Mr Murdoch.

Mr Murdoch's lawyers claimed in court that Private Media and its "guiding minds" then contrived to use the concerns notice to "generate subscriptions to Crikey and thus income to Private Media under the guise of defending public interest journalism".

At a hearing in January, the court heard Private Media engaged a public relations firm, Populares, after it received Mr Murdoch's legal letter.

The publisher's lawyer Michael Bradley introduced Private Media to Populares saying Crikey was "about to get itself immersed in a big fight and is looking for expert help".

The court heard emails from July and August also showed Mr Fray, Mr Beecher and Mr Hayward discussing ideas to roll out a "Lachlan Murdoch campaign".

The original article was republished on August 15, and shared on Crikey's social media.

Private Media then took out a full-page ad in the New York Times on August 22 which invited Mr Murdoch to sue, while Crikey published several related articles.

Mr Murdoch launched his lawsuit on August 23.

Barrister Sue Chrysanthou, acting for Mr Murdoch, told the court Crikey sold 5,000 new subscriptions after the lawsuit was filed - a "windfall of $500,000" - at a discounted "Lachlan Murdoch rate".

Trial dates were set for both March and September this year, but both had already been vacated as the case evolved.

It is unclear whether the matter might return to court for a hearing over costs.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-21/lachlan-murdoch-drops-crikey-defamation-case/102251072

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18729148

File: 18b16cb53e78434⋯.jpg (115.35 KB,1080x721,1080:721,Mark_McGowan_meets_with_Bo….jpg)

File: d53287711c7f347⋯.jpg (279.39 KB,1880x1244,470:311,WA_Premier_Mark_McGowan_in….jpg)

File: 7f4958a850d351d⋯.jpg (170.44 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Yang_Hengjun_and_Cheng_Lei….jpg)

>>18719425

>>18723436

>>18723446

‘The king of WA’: McGowan moves closer to Beijing

Eryk Bagshaw and Hamish Hastie - April 21, 2023

1/2

Between glasses of Australian wine under golden chandeliers at the China World Summit Wing in downtown Beijing, captains of industry, embassy officials and mining moguls gathered to hear West Australian Premier Mark McGowan speak.

“The King of WA,” his Chinese hosts reportedly called him this week. McGowan had returned to Beijing after four years of COVID-induced absence, $20 billion in trade strikes and years of division between Perth and the former Coalition government in Canberra on China policy.

In the Chinese capital, he predicted the relationship between Australia and China would become “a harmonious and productive one” and announced China’s version of Davos would be heading to Perth this year as WA’s annual exports to China hit a record $146 billion.

“Perhaps above any other state in Australia, Western Australia understands the importance of the relationship with China,” he said on Tuesday.

The Chinese government’s swag of deals with regional Australian leaders in the lead-up to a series of diplomatic disputes with the federal government gave it years of economic leverage. When Canberra tore up Victoria’s Belt and Road agreement with Beijing in 2021, the superpower’s top economic planner suspended the China-Australia Strategic Economic Dialogue. When Australia was hit with crippling tariffs for calling for an independent inquiry into COVID-19, some of the loudest voices calling for the federal government to change its tone were WA’s rock lobster farmers.

“We are acting against our own interests,” McGowan told former prime minister Scott Morrison in June 2021.

In Beijing, he told the audience that WA was back in business, fuelled by the state’s multimillion-dollar investment campaign and a Labor government in Canberra.

“It’s an old trap,” said Feng Chongyi, a professor of Chinese politics at the University of Technology Sydney. “It has been a long strategy by the Chinese government to target local government. Now in WA because of the trade in iron ore and coal, there is quite an incentive for the local government to do that.”

Throughout Europe, the US and Asia, local governments are grappling with a push by Beijing to split policy at the subnational and national levels. Federal Labor wants to stabilise the relationship, but McGowan went much further than that by suggesting the national cabinet should go to Beijing.

The event was organised by AustCham, a business lobby that facilitates meetings between Australian leaders and corporate executives in China. In his former life, Nick Coyle would have been at McGowan’s royal table. Today, the former chief executive of AustCham is fighting every day for his partner Cheng Lei’s release from a Beijing jail.

“I was thinking to myself 18 months ago that would have been me at that table,” he said.

McGowan has refused to raise the cases of Cheng and fellow detained Australian Yang Hengjun in his four days in the country. He has argued that foreign policy is not his domain, despite accusing federal Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie of taking “Cold War pills” and calling for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and every premier to go to Beijing for meetings this year.

“It’s pretty ridiculous that the premier can’t point out the bleeding obvious,” said Coyle. “The ongoing detention of Lei causes significant problems in the relationship.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18729153

File: 3901935561fbca7⋯.jpg (252.92 KB,1728x1152,3:2,Kerry_Stokes_newspapers_ha….jpg)

File: 7b0c9a1d2b0194f⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,4868x3245,4868:3245,WA_Premier_Mark_McGowan_an….jpg)

>>18729148

2/2

McGowan preferred to focus on networking with Chinese oil giant Sinopec, Woodside and Pran, a Chinese importer of sanctioned premium Australian wines that had sponsored the event.

There was banter about buying vineyards in Margaret River, jokes about living on campus at university in Queensland and praise from a high-flying Beijing-based executive who despite WA’s sealed borders found shelter for himself and his wife when he was locked out of China during COVID.

McGowan told those gathered at another event, the China-WA strategic dialogue on Thursday, that WA had gone further than any other state to keep its back channels open with Beijing.

“Even over the COVID period, we ensured that our language publicly and our work privately was very much designed to ensure that continuing strong relationship that is mutually beneficial both for China and for Western Australia,” he said.

McGowan hoped this relationship would give him some sway when he raised the issue of Chinese trade tariffs and import bans that decimated WA exports like wine, barley and rock lobsters.

Matt Taylor, the Western Rock Lobster Council’s chief executive said he was encouraged by McGowan’s trip.

“At the end of the day, it’s only going to be solved through actions and relationship-building activities rather than just words, so I think it’s encouraging for sure,” he said.

Grain Industry Association WA barley council chair Lyndon Mickel said McGowan’s representations in China would help edge the country closer to removing the tariffs.

“It puts a light at the end of the tunnel for us after the last couple of years of not having one of our major markets,” he said.

But the premier’s trip has also raised questions about transparency.

Chinese government restrictions meant only one reporter and one photographer were allowed to travel with him. They were both chosen from Kerry Stokes’ West Australian newspaper, which gave the trip four days of glowing coverage.

Stokes has millions of dollars in business interests in China. The papers made no mention of Cheng, Yang or any of the other human rights or national security hurdles in the relationship.

West Australian journalists on the flight with McGowan to Beijing did not appear at the premier’s press conference, nor were reporters in Australia asked to dial in.

The questions were left to his press secretary David Cooper. “What are the key outcomes you want to get from this trade mission,” he asked McGowan.

“It can’t be overstated how important China’s relationship is to Western Australia’s economy, but this isn’t just about reconnecting, it’s also about the future, isn’t it?”

The premier was unavailable for an interview during the trip. Other outlets had to rely on edited vision captured by staff hired by McGowan’s office and distributed to networks.

Media expert Tim Dwyer from the University of Sydney said he was not surprised that McGowan wanted to control the message.

“Clearly, it’s not ideal in terms of accountability to only have the premier’s PR rep asking the questions at his press conferences,” he said.

“The fact Kerry Stokes is getting favourable access to China – through The West Australian – to further his own business interests, is also arguably beneficial for folks in WA.”

The premier gave an interview during his time in Beijing to The Global Times, the Chinese state media outlet whose editor threatened Australia with “long-range missile strikes” at the height of the diplomatic dispute in 2021.

The same outlet has reported that Cheng’s closed-door trial was “entirely legitimate” and accused Australia of “unjustifiable interference” in Yang’s case.

Feng, who is friends with Yang, the detained writer, said it was “morally indefensible for Australian governments to normalise relations with China while China holds Australians hostage”.

“The Chinese government knows that as long they can get support from the business community, as well as some government officials, they can move things around,” he said.

https://www.watoday.com.au/world/asia/the-king-of-wa-mcgowan-moves-closer-to-beijing-20230420-p5d24j.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18729172

File: ff3db4c80c77989⋯.jpg (139.45 KB,1188x1159,1188:1159,Former_pilot_Daniel_Duggan….jpg)

File: 4e6b610e5ed9250⋯.jpg (2.93 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Duggan_s_lawyer_Dennis_Mir….jpg)

Lawyers for ‘Top Gun’ pilot write to US ambassador asking to halt extradition

Georgina Mitchell - April 21, 2023

Lawyers for former US military pilot Daniel Duggan have written to the US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy and her Australian counterpart Kevin Rudd urging for the extradition of the father-of-six to be withdrawn.

Duggan, 54, an Australian citizen, has been in custody since October accused of training Chinese military pilots in South Africa in 2012 without seeking permission from the US Department of Justice – an allegation he denies.

The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security confirmed in March a formal inquiry would be held into the circumstances of Duggan’s case, including the legality of his apprehension. Much of the probe cannot be discussed due to national security.

High-profile barrister Bret Walker, SC, has been briefed to appear for Duggan and will seek for the proceedings against him to be stayed pending the inquiry’s outcome. Duggan is also expected to apply for bail.

Duggan’s lawyer Dennis Miralis said on Thursday one aspect of the inquiry he was able to discuss was the possibility his client was “lured” back to Australia by being given an ASIO clearance, only to be “almost immediately arrested” when he arrived.

He said such a lure was not permitted under Australian law, which raised questions about the operation of the extradition treaty between Australia and the US.

In a submission to the federal parliament’s joint standing committee on treaties, Miralis wrote this week that the treaty in its present form “lacks sufficient human rights safeguards for Australian citizens whose extradition is being sought by the US”.

“In particular, the treaty fails to expressly prohibit the use of lures/subterfuge or the abduction/kidnapping of Australian citizens,” Miralis wrote.

He said on Thursday he had written to Kennedy, Rudd and the US Department of Justice to ask for his client’s extradition to be withdrawn until the inspector-general’s investigation concluded.

“We have not received a response to date, however we have informed the US ambassador as well as the US Department of Justice that we will be bringing that correspondence before the court in support of an application to stay the proceedings,” Miralis said.

He said he had brought to Rudd’s attention that the case had the ability to affect US-Australian relations.

Miralis said it was possible for the US to withdraw the extradition request and make another request later if it deemed this necessary.

He said if the extradition was not withdrawn by May 1, when Duggan’s case was due to be mentioned in Downing Centre Local Court, he would seek a timetable for the stay application.

“The course that we are submitting should be undertaken is that the US should not have the right to continue pressing its proceedings in an Australian court until the IGIS independent investigation is properly concluded,” Miralis said.

He said his client was experiencing “acute mental distress” from being held in a high-security prison, and frequently mentioned his six children.

Last week, Duggan’s wife Saffrine separately wrote to Kennedy to ask for the extradition to be dropped, outlining the “catastrophic” and “debilitating” effects on her family.

“We simply don’t understand why the United States is in relentless pursuit of a man who served your country as a Marine, and is now an Australian citizen, over 11-year-old allegations put together by the Trump administration in 2017, and that Dan strongly denies,” she wrote last week. “Surely you agree that it must stop today.”

Mrs Duggan said the allegations hinged on “the disputed claim about training ‘military’ pilots without permission”, but “permission wasn’t needed because the trainees were civilians”.

“[S]uch an offence would ordinarily have a five-year statute of limitations,” she said. “And yet my husband remains in a maximum security prison in a clear abuse of his human rights.”

Duggan formerly operated Top Gun Tasmania, a business in Hobart offering scenic flights in fighter planes.

The case returns to court on May 1.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/lawyers-for-top-gun-pilot-write-to-us-ambassador-asking-to-halt-extradition-20230420-p5d22y.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734240

File: f723bc2ab44bd89⋯.jpg (160.6 KB,1280x720,16:9,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_w….jpg)

>>18676743

Indigenous voice to parliament is solution looking for problem to solve and will only divide

NYUNGGAI WARREN MUNDINE - APRIL 22, 2023

1/2

This year Australians will vote to introduce a constitutionally ­enshrined, vast and expensive new bureaucracy called the Indigenous voice to parliament.

The voice will interface with every level of the commonwealth government apparatus, with every decision and policy subject to delay and/or judicial challenge if it is not paid proper homage.

It’s inherently undemocratic for parliament, ministers, the public service and every government agency to be beholden to an unelected body.

But even within the Aboriginal population, the voice won’t be a democratic instrument. Its members won’t be elected; but chosen by committee.

How the membership of the voice will be determined is perhaps the most astounding of all the eye-opening revelations that emerge when a forensic torch is applied to the 2021 Indigenous Voice Co-design Process Report to the federal government by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton, the 3cm thick document that outlines the intended design of the voice.

The report proposes 22 new Indigenous “regions”, which will each send a representative to the national voice. Aside from the Torres Strait Islands, and maybe Tasmania, the voice regions have been set with no nod to cultural divisions at all and bear no resemblance to actual First Nations across Australia. These new regions will not just be geographic boundaries but will in fact be new Indigenous groups. Groups that will take on a life of their own and no doubt come to dominate Aboriginal politics.

Within those boundaries we ­already have land councils and ­native title traditional owner representative bodies (each of which have their own territorial reach) and a huge number of community organisations and Aboriginal-controlled service providers.

NSW, for example, which has the largest Indigenous population of all the states and territories, will be somehow divided into two regions plus some arbitrary “remote” region created in the far west of the state. There’s no indication of how and where the borders will be applied. And I can tell you, I see trouble no matter where they’re drawn.

This schema is also applied to Queensland, Northern Territory, Western Australia and South Australia. That makes 15 regions. Torres Strait, Tasmania and the ACT have two each. Then there is a “region” created for all Torres Strait Islanders who live on the mainland, who can also be part of the selection process (via community organisations) for representatives from other regions based on where they reside.

So how will each of these “regions” choose a representative for the national voice? The answer is astounding.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734246

File: 118019e4d9eef36⋯.jpg (159.95 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Warren_Mundine_at_Hyde_Par….jpg)

>>18734240

2/2

The co-design group rejected the idea that national voice representatives should be elected. One reason they rejected it is that a low voter turnout would threaten “the legitimacy and authority of the national voice”. They were certainly aware of the lessons from ATSIC elections, when the voter turnout was less than 40 per cent of the Aboriginal enrolments and in certain jurisdictions as low as 10 per cent. But if the authority of a national voice cannot be assured by a democratic process, where does the voice draw its legitimacy from?

Representatives of the voice will in fact be chosen by the huge number of disparate Aboriginal organisations located within the regions. And they are expected to do this by consensus. How, exactly, I’m not sure. There are many infographics and breakout boxes in the report you can take a closer look at. And get even more confused.

There is nothing to be gained from glossing “Indigenous” people in rural, urban and remote Australia, or in any state or territory, as homogenous, and of one mind. We’re not the Borg from Star Trek. And the idea that the huge number of different, often competing, Aboriginal community organisations across vast regions can come to consensus on anything is laughable.

More to the point, why should people have to join a local Aboriginal organisation to be heard? My lead researcher on this series of papers, Dr Vicki Grieves Williams, told me of a conversation with an Aboriginal friend who said she supported the voice “because we have to have something, there’s nothing happening”. She was shocked she’d have to join a local Aboriginal ­organisation to have input into the selection of her region’s representative. The friend concluded she would be unlikely to be involved, telling Vicki: “I’m not a joiner.”

This didn’t surprise either of us. In our experience, many Aboriginal people are not. I see many Aboriginal organisations controlled by factions, with family and kin allegiances privileged over anything else and people only joining organisations controlled by their own family or to take over from another.

Far from giving Aboriginal people a voice the proposed model will disenfranchise many of us. I predict endless politics and factional brawling, and organisations caught up in power plays for the large amount of funding and ­resources that will come with the voice. Many Aboriginal people will want to stay right out of it.

There will be even less focus on real improvements as funding is chewed up supporting blackfellas to talk (and fight) among themselves and with everyone else. ­Aboriginal people don’t need this artificial imposition on them, to take their energies away from what truly matters.

The whole premise of the voice is that Aboriginals want and need it. But the voice’s own architects are afraid Aboriginal people won’t bother to participate in its elections.

The voice is a solution looking for a problem, demanded by a minority of Aboriginal elites. It will not help communities. And it will not reconcile our nation. It may well help tear those communities and our nation apart.

Nyunggai Warren Mundine is director, Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies, and president of Recognise a Better Way. Acknowledgments to Dr Vicki Grieves Williams, academic, historian and Warraimaay woman for her research and contribution to this series of articles.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/voice-to-parliament-solution-looking-for-problem-will-only-divide/news-story/64650927d66baba55c10f6e7b313299b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734262

File: a87dbe1b83ff533⋯.jpg (69.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Encep_Nurjaman_also_known_….jpg)

Hambali lawyer seeks AFP records for pre-trial hearing at Guantanamo Bay

CAMERON STEWART - APRIL 21, 2023

The Australian Federal Police have stonewalled repeated requests to provide access to their records on the accused Bali bombing mastermind known as Hambali ahead of his first pre-trial hearing next week, his US military lawyer says.

Encep “Hambali” Nurjaman, who was once Southeast Asia’s most wanted terrorist, will face a military court in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, next week for just the second time since his arrest in Thailand 20 years ago.

The hearing will mark the start of a pre-trial process that could last for years and which Hambali’s lawyer, Jim Hodes, believes is unlikely to ever result in a formal trial of his client. The first pre-trial hearing, scheduled for late last year was cancelled.

“They will do everything they can to kick this trial as far down the road as possible,” he told The Australian. “Twenty years on, nothing about this process gives me any confidence at all.”

The now 59-year-old Indonesian-born alleged mastermind of the deadly 2002 Bali bombings and 2003 Jakarta Marriott bombing was a close associate of 9/11 al-Qa’ida mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Jemaah Islamiah founder Abu Bakar Bashir. He was publicly charged last year and is facing trial alongside two Malaysian citizens on the US naval base on charges including conspiracy, murder, attempted murder and terrorism.

Hambali has been held in Guantanamo Bay since 2006 after spending three years being tortured for information at CIA black sites around the world. Mr Hodes says the delay in bringing Hambali to trial has been disgraceful.

But US prosecutors have struggled to gather evidence that can be used in a court against Hambali because much of the evidence against him was obtained under torture while in CIA black sites between 2003 and 2006.

Mr Hodes says he has been unable to obtain the evidence against his client from the US military and he has also requested access via FOI to AFP records relating to Hambali in the hope of finding evidence, or a lack of it, in relation to Hambali’s role.

“There is so much information in Australia (and) we want all the records we can find,” he said.

Mr Hodes said he had made three requests for information from the AFP during the past year, reducing the scope of each request after the AFP initially told him the documents were too numerous to search. But the AFP has so far not released any information to him or given any indication that it will do so. An AFP spokesman said the AFP had received an FOI request from Mr Hodes but it was still too broad in its scope.

“The request was in broad terms and the AFP is continuing to liaise with the defence team to narrow the scope of the request, in accordance with the FOI Act,’ the spokesman said.

The first pre-trial hearing in Guantanamo Bay set down for Tuesday, Australian time, is expected to focus on narrow legal questions including a dispute over the neutrality of the government-appointed translators for the trial.

Prosecutors will also ask the judge for more time to provide trial evidence to Mr Hodes, while the defence team will seek a timetable for an actual trial.

Hambali is one of only 31 prisoners left at Guantanamo Bay.

A US Senate report in 2014 revealed his treatment in CIA black sites included waterboarding, beatings, nude shackling and stress positions. His alleged key role in the 2002 Bali bombings led to the deaths of 202 people including 88 Australians. He is also alleged to have played a key role in the Jakarta Marriott Hotel bombing the following year which killed 12 people and left up to 150 injured.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hambali-lawyer-seeks-afp-records-for-pretrial-hearing-at-guantanamo-bay/news-story/f8af9ae68de5a6a7b1e0e3aacb3aad23

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734316

File: 4c4303c06b42ae2⋯.jpg (127.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_arrives_t….jpg)

File: 8698dee3af5594b⋯.jpg (75.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,Director_of_Public_Prosecu….jpg)

>>18708667

DPP Shane Drumgold complicit with Brittany Higgins’ bid to prejudice case, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer claims

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - APRIL 22, 2023

1/3

The chief prosecutor in Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial was “complicit” in a bid by Brittany Higgins to prejudice the case against him, according to an extraordinary draft submission to the ACT ­Supreme Court prepared by Sydney barrister Arthur Moses SC.

The explosive 36-page document obtained by The Australian sheds new light on developments in the Lehrmann case that have been shrouded in secrecy because of suppression orders imposed by ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum.

This document, and the circumstances in which it was intended to be filed with the court, raise questions about the reasons for the decision by ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold not to proceed with a retrial. Those issues are likely to form part of the Sofronoff inquiry into the conduct of the DPP and the Australian Federal Police that commenced this week.

The draft submission prepared by Mr Moses – who was acting for Mr Lehrmann – related to an application filed by Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers on November 22 last year after the original trial was aborted in October due to juror misconduct. The Australian cannot legally report the nature of that application, which remains subject to a suppression order issued by CJ McCallum, nor does The Australian have any material filed in that proceeding.

However, The Australian has obtained a draft of Mr Moses’ proposed submission which was never finalised or filed with the court. The Australian understands this draft submission, dated December 1, was very close to being the final version that would have been filed the next day. The filing slated for December 2 did not proceed given the DPP’s shock decision, announced that same day, that he was dropping charges against Mr Lehrmann. Mr Drumgold’s stated reason was the mental health of Ms Higgins.

The Australian has been told that Mr Drumgold would have been aware of the central claims against him in the days leading up to his decision not to retry Mr Lehrmann.

In the submission, Mr Moses describes Mr Drumgold’s “inaction” over the emotional speech delivered by Ms Higgins outside court after Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial was aborted as “deeply troubling” and alleges the DPP failed to safeguard Mr Lehrmann’s fundamental right to a fair trial.

Ms Higgins claimed in the speech that the criminal justice system had “long failed to deliver outcomes to victims of sexual assault”, that Mr Lehrmann had not been forced to surrender his mobile phone and data – as she had – and that he had not been held accountable for “his actions”.

“Despite the trial judge giving a clear warning about the importance of preserving (Mr Lehrmann’s) right to a fair trial, (Ms Higgins) delivered a prepared speech to a crowd of waiting media at the front of the court,” Mr Moses said.

“The speech attacked (Mr Lehrmann’s) right to silence, ignored the presumption of innocence, and impugned the fairness of the criminal justice system.”

The speech clearly had the potential to improperly influence and place pressure on jurors in any retrial and was factually wrong because Mr Lehrmann did surrender his mobile phone to police, Mr Moses said.

“In the absence of evidence from (Mr Drumgold) as to any warning given by him to (Ms Higgins) concerning the possibility that her conduct may undermine the integrity of the trial it may be inferred and therefore found that (Mr Drumgold) failed to take the most basic, obvious and fundamental of steps as part of his positive and inviolable duty to ensure a fair trial.”

Not only was Mr Drumgold’s “inertia” inconsistent with his obligations as a prosecutor to safeguard Mr Lehrmann’s right to a fair trial, “but it also gives rise to the inference that (Mr Drumgold) condones the speech”, Mr Moses says in the draft opinion.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734322

File: 9dec962bd474dfb⋯.jpg (81.01 KB,768x1024,3:4,Bruce_Lehrmann.jpg)

File: 7f6d4d99ba9b901⋯.jpg (62.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,Arthur_Moses_SC.jpg)

>>18734316

2/3

In any event, Mr Moses said, by failing to take any effective steps to prevent the speech or remove it from publication, Mr Drumgold had been “complicit” in Ms Higgins’ conduct and “the prejudice to (Mr Lehrmann’s) right to a fair trial has occurred as a result of egregious conduct by the Crown, and those for whom the Crown is responsible”.

An inquiry led by Walter Sofronoff KC is examining the conduct of the DPP, the Australian Federal Police and the ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner during the Lehrmann-Higgins saga.

The inquiry was sparked in part by revelations in The Australian that police believed there was insufficient evidence to prosecute Mr Lehrmann but could not stop the DPP from doing so because, in the words of one senior investigator, “there is too much political interference”.

Those revelations were followed by publication in The Guardian of a letter sent by Mr Drumgold to police chief Neil Gaughan alleging “a very clear campaign” by police to pressure him not to prosecute Mr Lehrmann.

Mr Sofronoff’s terms of reference include examining whether the DPP failed to act in accordance with his duties or acted in breach of his duties in making his decisions to commence, to continue and to discontinue criminal proceedings against Mr Lehrmann, and if he did, his reasons and motives for doing so.

The first public hearing of the inquiry began on Monday, the same day CJ McCallum elected to publish her judgment dated December 2 last year where she gave reasons for continuing to suppress material about the case – including the nature of the application for which Mr Moses had drafted his submission – even after the DPP announced he would not re-try Mr Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold told a press conference a retrial would pose a “significant and unacceptable risk to the life of the complainant” but surprised many in the legal profession by lauding Ms Higgins’ conduct and publicly stating he still believed there was a reasonable prospect of convicting Mr Lehrmann at a second trial.

Several senior lawyers questioned whether it was appropriate for a DPP, who has a duty to the administration of justice rather than to individual complainants, to make public statements of that nature.

Mr Moses’ draft submission to the court was prepared in the days before Mr Drumgold’s decision not to proceed with the retrial, as part of the November 22 application brought by Mr Lerhmann’s lawyers.

A past president of both the NSW Bar Association and the Law Council of Australia, Mr Moses has represented many of the highest-profile litigants and defendants in Australia during his 30 years at the Bar.

When contacted by The Australian, Mr Moses declined to comment on the draft document.

Senior lawyers have told The Australian that submissions must always be signed off by counsel only on the basis that there are evidentiary and legal grounds to advance the contentions contained in the submission.

In his draft submission to the ACT Supreme Court, Mr Moses described Ms Higgins’ speech as “an extraordinary attack on the criminal justice system and the fundamental rights of an accused” that “deliberately generated adverse publicity to prejudice (Mr Lehrmann’s) ability to receive a fair trial”.

“It denigrates (Mr Lehrmann’s) presumption of innocence and right to silence, and seeks to invert the Crown’s onus of proof, by implying that (Mr Lehrmann) is using a broken criminal justice system to conceal his guilt, as others have done before him”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734327

File: 88ebe834975ec8b⋯.jpg (105.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,Crown_Prosecutor_Shane_Dru….jpg)

>>18734322

3/3

Mr Moses said the prejudicial nature of the speech was amplified by a number of factors, including the widespread publication of the comments and the endorsement or support for Ms Higgins, including from then prime minister Scott Morrison, who apologised in parliament to her “for the terrible things that took place here”.

Former prime minister Julia Gillard also publicly applauded Ms Higgins’ “courage in coming forward with her experiences, and her determination to make sure other women do not ever have to go through what she has”.

Mr Moses also references the February 2022 National Press Club event when Ms Higgins spoke about “my rape”.

“The conduct of prominent persons and public institutions and the lending of credibility to (Ms Higgins) concerning her allegations against the accused has corrupted the process leading up to the trial in a way that is not capable of being remedied by directions given to a jury,” Mr Moses said.

“This is an extraordinary case, where from the day the allegations became public the conduct of a complainant and the lending of credibility to her allegations against the accused by prominent persons and trusted public institutions has been unprecedented.

“That unprecedented public conduct of (Ms Higgins) and others called for the most elementary of steps to be taken by (Mr Drumgold) to seek to ensure a fair trial.”

Mr Moses noted that Mr Lehrmann’s solicitor wrote to Mr Drumgold on November 14 last year raising concerns about Ms Higgins’ speech and asking what action he proposed to take, including steps to have any publication of it removed, and to ensure her conduct was not repeated.

Mr Drumgold’s curt, three-sentence reply was “remarkable”, Mr Moses said. After confirming receipt of the letter, the DPP wrote: “My office does not make public comment about matters before the court, and we continue to strongly discourage everyone (including defence) from making public comment on a matter currently before the court.”

There was no evidence of any warnings that Mr Drumgold had provided to Ms Higgins about the importance of not making prejudicial public statements, or “that her conduct may undermine the integrity of the trial”, Mr Moses said. In the absence of such evidence the court could infer that Mr Drumgold had not done so, “and in failing to do so has failed to take easy and obvious steps in doing all things that are reasonably necessary to ensure a fair trial”.

Mr Moses cites several cases in which Ms Higgins made public statements about the case after Mr Lehrmann was committed to stand trial, including interviews with The Australian Womens Weekly and Marie Claire magazine, an address at the National Press Club, and an Instagram post containing the transcript of a covertly recorded phone call between herself and a witness in the trial, Daniel Try.

“There is no evidence of any warnings that (Mr Drumgold) has provided to (Ms Higgins) about the importance of not making public statements that could prejudice (Mr Lehrmann’s) right to a fair trial at any time from February 2021 to just before the speech. This begs the question as to whether (Mr Drumgold) has ever advised (Ms Higgins) that her conduct may undermine the integrity of the trial.”

Ms Higgins first spoke to police about the alleged rape on April 1, 2019, a week after the events at Parliament House, but informed them two weeks later she did not wish to continue with the allegations. On February 5, 2021, she re-engaged with police, telling them she had been interviewed by the media and did not want to do an evidence-in-chief interview until her interview with The Project host Lisa Wilkinson had aired on television.

The following day police advised Ms Higgins that intended media events may jeopardise any subsequent criminal investigation.

However, Ms Higgins made it clear to police she was not willing to provide investigators with a formal statement in relation to the allegations until the media stories had been published.

Mr Drumgold did not respond to requests for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/dpp-complicit-with-brittany-higgins-bruce-lehrmanns-lawyer-claims/news-story/7b6fd82cab9641908bf5b60b2741dcff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734375

File: a1df6ba992b74f0⋯.jpg (72.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,WA_Premier_Mark_McGowan.jpg)

File: 5d1f98c350985cf⋯.jpg (101.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shadow_Minister_for_Defenc….jpg)

>>18719425

>>18723436

>>18729148

McGowan ‘has lost respect’ after gaffe-marred China visit

PAUL GARVEY - APRIL 21, 2023

WA Premier Mark McGowan’s gaffe-marred visit to China may have hurt his standing not just at home but also in Beijing.

Mr McGowan’s first visit to the state’s single-biggest trading partner – it is the primary customer for the tens of billions of dollars of iron ore pumped out of the Pilbara every year – since the pandemic was punctuated by two eyebrow-raising incidents.

Video recordings distributed to media by his own team included footage inadvertently capturing Mr McGowan slagging federal opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie.

The vision, recorded at a lunch meeting of the China-Australia Chamber of Commerce, shows him telling the chamber’s chair Vaughn Barber that Mr Hastie had “swallowed some kind of Cold War pills back when he was born and he couldn‘t get his mindset out of that”.

Later, Mr McGowan suggested that all state premiers travel with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for a national cabinet-style delegation to China.

The idea was quickly rejected by NSW Premier Chris Minns and ridiculed by national security experts.

While Mr McGowan’s visit was designed to help restore relations that had been strained in recent years, Kevin Carrico – a senior lecturer in Chinese studies at Monash University – said it may have actually diminished his standing in the eyes of Beijing.

“Leaders in Beijing will be laughing at his gullibility because what he’s showing is a willingness to essentially do anything to please Beijing,” he said. “In one sense, of course, that makes Beijing happy. In another sense, there’s no chance of the leaders in Beijing respecting him.”

He said the comments about Mr Hastie were particularly inappropriate, given the “unrelenting and unfair” pressures the federal MP had come under from Beijing.

“We all play politics and have people that we might like or might dislike, but when you’re speaking with officials from a government that not only have placed extreme pressures on Australia, but are also engaged in large-scale transnational repression and harassment … (the comments are) inappropriate and frankly disgraceful,” he said.

Dr Carrico said the national cabinet delegation suggestion was “completely unrealistic”.

“It’s … just a quite obvious and really almost gross attempt to win over affection from the leaders of a state that have applied unrelenting and extra-legal pressures not only on Australian businesses through mass tariffs, but also upon people who are just trying to live their lives and speak honestly about Chinese Communist Party rule today,” he said.

“Anybody could do a better job if they just didn’t go to Beijing and basically kneel before the leaders there and essentially promote the idea of Australia as a vassal state of China.”

General Jack Keane, former vice-chief of staff for the US Army who sits on the US Commission on National Defence Strategy, told Sky News he was stunned by the national cabinet suggestion. “I’m surprised that we still have people out there that are that naive about dealing with China and who they really are,” he said.

WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam said the two incidents showed that Mr McGowan was “out of his depth” on the world stage.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/mcgowan-has-lost-respect-after-gaffemarred-china-visit/news-story/824686c221bca2599d87438ec831acdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734455

File: 01b6a94fc33a665⋯.jpg (249.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Both_Vicky_Xu_and_Badiucao….jpg)

File: f66d826be70e237⋯.jpg (1.67 MB,3024x4032,3:4,Vicky_Xu_said_China_s_hara….jpg)

>>18719406

‘No sense of safety’: Australian citizens reveal extraordinary lengths Chinese Communist Party will go to silence dissent

Two Australian citizens have detailed the extraordinary lengths the Chinese government will go to silence foreign dissidents and the harrowing experiences of those subject to the intimidation and harassment campaigns.

Patrick Hannaford - April 22, 2023

An Australian parliamentary committee has heard about the harrowing experiences of two Chinese-Australians subject to extraordinary harassment campaigns by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Journalist Vicky Xu and artist Badiucao spoke to the senate committee on foreign interference through social media, detailing the CCP lengths the Chinese government will go to silence foreign dissidents.

Ms Xu, a journalist and senior fellow at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), said the Chinese government had been trying to “to silence, intimidate and harass” for her entire six to seven year career.

But it was the response to her 2020 Uighurs for Sale report – which made international news – that forced her to change how she lived.

The report detailed how the Chinese government was subjecting large numbers of Uighur Muslims to force labour working in the supply chains of 83 well-known global brands.

“Because of the influence and impact of that report, the Chinese government decided…cancelled me, personally,” Ms Xu told the committee.

“Tens of media outlets published articles calling me a traitor, a sl*t, a drug addicts and these are attempts to character assassinate me.

“And social media specifically played a big role in this so-called cancellation because there are hundreds of accounts pumping out content and that goes across the entirety of the Chinese internet. From WeChat, Weibo, to the Chinese version of Quora…(and) the Chinese equivalent of Youtube.”

Ms Xu said that because the state had essentially branded her a traitor and made an example out of her, a lot of content makers “jumped on the bandwagon and started denouncing me”.

“This led to the result of the complete breakdown of basically all of my personal relationships I’ve had in the first 19 years of everybody I’ve ever known in China,” she said.

“My grandfather banned everyone from speaking to me ever again in my family. My childhood friends – there are boyfriends who have now become influencers who are now denouncing me and describing me and my immoral behaviour on Chinese social media.”

The Chinese-Australian journalist detailed how a close friend had been “repeatedly interrogated” by the Chinese Ministry of State Security while visiting their family back in China.

“She was known to have a close relationship with me so the Chinese secret police interrogated her repeatedly to gain information about my personal life,” Ms Xu said.

“And around that dossier of information they built this completely ludicrous account of who I am and made a (four-part) documentary about my supposed drug-infested promiscuous private life – and dropped it on YouTube on Christmas in 2020.”

Chinese Artist and human rights campaigner Badiucao, who is also an Australian citizen, also spoke to the committee about how the CCP had targeted his relatives in China in order to get to him.

“I was an anonymous artist for a very long time until 2018 when my identity was compromised by China’s national security police online and then what happened is they started to use WeChat and other methods to harass my family – particularly back in China,” he said.

“They would actually take my relatives to the police station for interrogation.”

“They couldn’t reach me directly so they would use WeChat as a tool in order to get to me – sometimes even pretending to be my relatives.

“They would hijack or just use my relatives' WeChat account in order to call me or message me to threaten me and intimidate me from making political art against the Chinese government.”

Like Ms Xu, Badiucao said he had also been subject to a smear campaign, detailing multiple attempts to create fake versions of his website with slightly different domain names.

“On the front page it looked exactly like mine but in fact, the content is entirely different. It became a collection of smear campaign articles calling me a criminal, traitor and hurting Chinese feelings, to even framing me as a paedophile,” the artist said.

“What they are doing is very clear. They cannot cancel or challenge my artwork so instead they choose to launch this smear campaign.

“The Chinese government knows that (this is) the only way they can stop dissidents overseas talking about those very important human rights issues.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734458

File: af636c325a532c9⋯.jpg (116.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chinese_Australian_artist_….jpg)

File: 4ea237e4ec5d050⋯.jpg (44.1 KB,650x366,325:183,Senator_Paterson_who_chair….jpg)

>>18734455

2/2

The Chinese-Australian artist said he had been battling Chinese propaganda and online influence for years, but it was “getting worse and worse”.

“I also find they are being more bold and aggressive,” Badiucao said, before detailing how he had recently been approached by someone claiming to be a journalist from Reuters.

“It turned out there are three different accounts from Telegram channel and Twitter pretending to be the entire China bureau of Reuters, and using this fake identity to trick dissidents… to send them sensitive information about human rights campaigns and other political opinions.”

“The way they are using it are quite sophisticated. Those fake journalists actually have the copy of the real identity card from the journalists, so that’s how they win your trust.”

The artist said he suspected this might be a small part of a much bigger operation and similar techniques are being used in order to influence the international community.

Badiucao said he receives death threats on an almost daily basis, and despite living in Australia, his family has “no sense of safety," while Ms Xu said that despite being a “strong resilient person,” the CCP had almost broken her.

“I can deal with criticism, but the sort of criticism that the Chinese government and nationalists threw at me – the sheer quantity of it – rendered me powerless for a period of time,” Ms Xu said.

“For about six months all that was in my head was how awful I am as a person, how I’m a liar, how I can’t do anything right, how I put my family and friends in dangerous situations. How I made the Uighur workers lose their jobs.

“These are complete nonsense but when the quantity of it accumulates to such a point it breaks a person.”

The Chinese-Australian journalist said she was still doing her work but she’d had to adapt, and her lifestyle was now one “akin to a criminal”.

“People in democracies, politicians, academics, people with good social standing tell me things like I’m going to end up in history books and that all sound grand but what about life?” she said.

Speaking to SkyNews.com.au, shadow home affairs minister James Paterson – who is chairing the committee into foreign interference on social media – said the experience of Vicky Xu and Badiucao was “harrowing and completely unacceptable.”

“As Chinese-Australians they have every right to freely participate in public debate without the fear of the long arm of a foreign authoritarian state intimidating them into silence,” Senator Paterson said.

“The fact that this is done partly online through highly personalized harassment makes it no less serious and demonstrates the need for reform to our counter foreign interference framework.”

Both Ms Xu and Badiucao highlighted the role WeChat plays in the CCP’s attempts to influence the Chinese diaspora in countries like Australia.

This comes as a Lowy Institute Report released this week found 82 per cent of Chinese-Australians use WeChat, with three-quarters of those using it to access Chinese-language news.

“WeChat has become this very toxic form of misinformation and propaganda for the Chinese government…Whether you’re inside China or outside China, the space for free speech to survive is just zero,” Badiucao said.

The artist said that members of the Chinese diaspora who used WeChat are effectively subject to China’s laws, which is how the Chinese government manages to export its censorship outside China.

According to Badiucao, WeChat should be regulated and forced to comply with Australian laws, and if they fail to comply, they should be punished or banned.

However Ms Xu said banning WeChat could backfire.

“Banning WeChat would in fact cause a lot of resentment and backlash in the Chinese diaspora community, because in order to stay in touch with people’s families and friends back home, WeChat is absolutely essential,” the journalist said.

“So I think banning it would make the Australian government appear to be more authoritarian than it could ever be.”

Ms Xu said the government should do more to educate Chinese-Australians about the risks of using WeChat and how best to mitigate those risks, but the journalist also acknowledged that these are risks most Chinese people already know.

“People know. People know WeChat spies on them. I think every Chinese person who uses WeChat knows that. End of the day it’s a personal choice,” she said.

Senator Paterson said that “all options” should be on the table to “combat this malign conduct – whether it is taking place on TikTok, WeChat, Twitter or YouTube.”

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/no-sense-of-safety-australian-citizens-reveal-extraordinary-lengths-chinese-communist-party-will-go-to-silence-dissent/news-story/9f464527c808a537ab33373e970c6a42

https://www.aspi.org.au/report/uyghurs-sale

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734520

File: d562bfea2d1614d⋯.jpg (82.44 KB,727x773,727:773,AUKUS_has_opened_a_Pandora….jpg)

>>18670474

AUKUS has opened a Pandora's box

Ruan Zongze - 2023-04-22

1/2

The US, UK defense leaders discussed Ukraine, AUKUS in a Pentagon meeting early this week. On March 14, leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia announced the pathway to cooperation on nuclear submarine at the naval base in San Diego, California, with great fanfare. With Cold War mentality behind it, this move will stimulate an arms race, undermine the international non-proliferation regime, and hurt the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region. They always have excuses to find fault with China, ludicrously blaming it to "China threat".

Under the painted veil of AUKUS lies the bad precedent set by the nuclear submarine cooperation among the US, the UK and Australia, in which a nuclear weapon state will transfer weapons-grade highly enriched uranium to a nonnuclear weapon state. This constitutes severe nuclear proliferation risks, runs counter to the purposes and goals of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and will create endless troubles.

Former Australian prime minister Paul Keating has criticized the AUKUS agreement, saying it is the "the worst international decision" by a Labor government in more than a century. The AUKUS colludes with the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (or Quad), aiming to form a NATO-like organization in the Asia-Pacific. NATO has already brought chaos to Europe. If it keeps going like this, the security and stability in the region will be threatened. But the Western powers use the "China threat" theory as a pretext to beat the drums of warfare.

Why does the AUKUS exploit the "China threat" issue? From their point of view, becoming stronger is China's original sin. China should be poor and weak as it was more than a century ago, so they could do whatever they wanted to with the country.

Politicians in the US and other Western countries claim that China will replace the current world order with a China-centered one. That's a fallacy. It is being used only to smear China.

Although it calls it a "rules-based international order", the US pursues a policy of "whoever follows will survive and whoever defies will perish", and plays might-is-right power politics, deviating far from the UN-centered world order.

Moreover, the US propagates the "democracy versus authoritarianism" narrative and plays the ideology card through events such as the "Summit for Democracy", so as to form so-called values-based alliances against China to check China's development.

The US, a self-proclaimed "beacon of democracy", is resorting to an authoritarian diplomatic policy and has been exporting its own democratic model by force for years. This has resulted in countless disasters and unrest across the world.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18734529

File: 883e328b01582c5⋯.jpg (3.55 MB,5910x3840,197:128,Dr_RUAN_Zongze_Consul_Gene….jpg)

>>18734520

2/2

What China has been doing, in contrast, is trying to safeguard the UN-centered world order, which is being trampled on by the US and some other Western countries. China doesn't export wars. For the 70-plus years since its founding, the People's Republic of China has never started a conflict, occupied one inch of foreign land or triggered a proxy war, and has one of the best peace records among major powers. China has put forward the Global Development Initiative, Global Security Initiative and the Global Civilization Initiative, and is helping build a community with a shared future for mankind as well as offering global public goods, which have been widely welcomed by the international community.

Recently, China brokered a rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Iran. During his recent visit to Russia, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a joint statement, stressing that the Ukraine crisis be settled through dialogue. These are part of China's Global Security Initiative.

By realizing the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation through Chinese modernization, China will become more capable of promoting world peace.

Surprisingly, this has been misread by the Australian media as a "diplomatic threat", with some even saying the "Middle East pact is bad for the US and Israel". This once again proves that, in the US-led West's eyes, the interest of the US comes before the international community's.

Australia has an inherent sense of insecurity. The Australian media hype up "China threat" theory out of different needs. In fact, what frightens Australia is "US threat" rather than the "China threat", for it fears both losing protection and receiving endless bludgeons if it doesn't follow the US.

Australia is part of the Asia-Pacific and should cherish peace and stability in the region. But ideologically and culturally, Australia identifies more with the Anglo-Saxon circle, closer to the US and the UK. For long, Australia has been trapped in an identity crisis and it has become a Trojan horse for the region. Regrettably, the AUKUS has made Australia a thorn in the flesh of Asia-Pacific nations, as it represents the US-led West.

The author is consul-general of the People's Republic of China in Brisbane, Australia.

https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202304/22/WS64433bf8a310b6054facf20a.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ec832d No.18737067

File: 495e11e564c82db⋯.jpg (88.06 KB,1393x950,1393:950,MV_Montevideo_Maru.jpg)

Discovery Of WW2 Shipwreck Ends Australia’s ‘Tragic’ Maritime Chapter

By Sam McKeith April 22, 2023

SYDNEY, April 22 (Reuters) – Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Saturday that the wreck of a Japanese merchant ship, sunk in World War Two with 864 Australian soldiers on board, had been found in the South China Sea, ending a tragic chapter of the country’s history.

Marles said the SS Montevideo Maru, an unmarked prisoner of war transport vessel missing since being sunk off the Philippines’ coast in July 1942, had been discovered northwest of Luzon island.

The ship was torpedoed en route from what is now Papua New Guinea to China’s Hainan by a U.S. submarine, unaware of the POWs onboard. It is considered Australia’s worst maritime disaster.

The long-awaited find comes ahead of April 25 commemorations for Anzac Day, a major day of remembrance in Australia and New Zealand for their troops killed in all military conflicts.

“This brings to an end one of the most tragic chapters in Australia’s maritime history,” Marles said in a video message.

The search for the wreck, found at a depth of more than 4,000 meters (13,123 feet) was led by a maritime archaeology not-for-profit and deep-sea survey specialists, and supported by Australia’s Defence department, according to the government.

“The absence of a location of the Montevideo Maru has represented unfinished business for the families of those who lost their lives until now,” Marles said.

More than 1,000 men – POWs and civilians from several countries – are thought to have lost their lives in the tragedy.

https://gcaptain.com/discovery-of-ww2-shipwreck-ends-australias-tragic-maritime-chapter/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18739389

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Conflict over Taiwan isn’t ‘inevitable’, Defence Minister Richard Marles says

Catie McLeod - April 23, 2023

Defence Minister Richard Marles says he doesn’t think a war over Taiwan is “inevitable” as he continues to defend Australia’s multi-billion dollar nuclear submarine plans.

Speaking on the eve of the release of a landmark review of Australia’s military capability, Mr Marles said the government remained optimistic a China-Taiwan conflict could be avoided.

The commonwealth’s plan to purchase and manufacture nuclear-powered military submarines under the AUKUS pact with the United States and UK has triggered questions about the role Australia would play if the US entered into a future war over the status of Taiwan.

Debate has ignited over how Australia can ensure it maintains sovereign capability of the submarines given the deal will involve technology sharing with the US as well as the purchase of up to five American vessels.

Mr Marles, who is also the Deputy Prime Minister, told Sky News on Sunday it was “completely fair enough” the AUKUS pact would attract criticism.

“We live in a free society and we expect that,” he said.

“But we will continue to make our argument to the Australian people about why it’s so important that we walk down this path. We need to have this capability.”

The AUKUS agreement was signed by the Morrison government in 2021 and it continues to be supported by both the Coalition and Labor.

Asked on Sunday about Paul Keating’s recent savage criticisms of the trilateral security pact, Mr Marles said he held the former Labor prime minister in “high regard”.

“I’ve been keen to keep him abreast of the thinking of the government and the direction in which we’re going,” he said.

Mr Marles said nuclear-powered submarines were “front and centre” to Australia’s mission to maintain collective security in the region and as well as the concept of a global rules-based order.

Sweeping recommendations to update Australia’s armed forces to counter the modern strategic challenges facing the country will be outlined in the Defence Strategic Review when it is released on Monday.

The review, led by former chief of defence Sir Angus Houston and former defence minister Stephen Smith, is expected to recommend a major increase to the nation’s military capabilities.

Mr Marles said on Sunday the review would provide a “thesis” of the “strategic landscape” Australia was a part of, pointing to the South China Sea as one issue that would be examined.

He suggested China and the US were part of a “great power contest” taking place around the world but said he was optimistic that struggle wouldn’t lead to a conflict over Taiwan.

“I have a sense of optimism. But having said that, we live in a very complex and difficult world. And we need to be alive to that,” he said.

“And that implies a lot in terms of the kind of defence force that we need.”

Mr Marles has previously shut down criticism from a security expert who claimed Australia had effectively committed to following the US into a conflict over Taiwan by signing the AUKUS agreement.

China hasn’t ruled out taking Taiwan — which split from the mainland 1949 but isn’t recognised as a sovereign nation by the United Nations or any major country including Australia — by force.

Speaking at the National Press Club in Canberra last month, former US Navy secretary Richard Spencer wouldn’t confirm the US would assist Taiwan if Beijing invaded the self-governed democracy of 24 million people.

However, Mr Spencer said he hoped Australia would send its nuclear powered submarines to support America if a conflict eventuated.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/conflict-over-taiwan-isnt-inevitable-defence-minister-richard-marles-says/news-story/a98d67834f2a192123aaea52e0a41a43

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkpSr3XhsKM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744291

File: 3bd7afa69177351⋯.jpg (1.81 MB,5386x3591,5386:3591,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe.jpg)

File: ab66e783bfc78e4⋯.jpg (5.2 MB,5094x3396,3:2,Thorpe_during_a_debate_ove….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18708643

Lidia Thorpe’s mum and allies in Victorian Voice bid

Paul Sakkal - April 24, 2023

Lidia Thorpe’s mother, cousins and political allies are angling for control of the Victorian body that will act as the state’s Indigenous Voice and interact with a national Voice to parliament, generating unrest among some Victorian Indigenous leaders who fear the maverick senator’s influence.

Thorpe, a Voice critic who quit the Greens over the party’s referendum stance, is allied with at least a dozen candidates in upcoming elections for the Victorian First Peoples’ Assembly, a representative body elected by Indigenous people that is tasked with negotiating a treaty with the state government.

If the Thorpe-connected candidates – including direct relatives and political allies – are successful, they would form arguably the dominant faction in the body expected to interact with the national Voice to parliament and help select Victorians for the Commonwealth advisory body.

Of the approximately 50 assembly candidates, 13 have identifiable links to Thorpe. They include her mother, Marjorie Thorpe, and cousins Alister Thorpe, Lisa Thorpe and Alice Pepper. The assembly is made up of 31 representatives.

Thorpe’s political allies include Ngarra Murray and Tracey Evans, who are seeking re-election and as assembly members last year questioned whether Labor state election candidate Lauren O’Dwyer lied about her Indigenous heritage, which prompted a rebuke from Premier Daniel Andrews.

Thorpe said last month that she expected her allies to make a run at the assembly election, which will conclude in mid-June. She did not respond to questions about this story.

Three senior Indigenous figures in Victoria, who spoke anonymously to frankly express their concerns and avoid possible retaliation, said Thorpe’s influence could compromise the assembly’s future relationship with the national Voice that Thorpe shuns.

An eminent Victorian Indigenous leader said her community worried Thorpe’s allies would compromise goodwill with the Victorian government in its nation-first treaty talks.

“If her time in Canberra is anything to go by, then it wouldn’t take her long to destroy the treaty in Victoria,” she said.

Though currently focused on a treaty, the assembly’s remit is expected to change in coming years and morph into a Victorian Voice body. The assembly is also expected to interact with the national Voice and play a role in selecting the Victorian representatives to the national body, highlighting the factional complexities the proposed Voice to parliament may run into.

Thorpe and her allies were not supportive of the Victorian assembly when it was announced by the Andrews Labor government because they argued it did not represent all 38 Aboriginal clans in Victoria. The figure cited was heavily contested by local Aboriginal groups.

The first-term senator quit the Greens in February to free herself up to criticise the Voice and advance Indigenous sovereignty. The former Victorian parliament MP has been involved in several high-profile incidents this year, including a strip-club outburst this month that prompted Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to suggest she needed support for health problems. Thorpe called his comments a “racist and misogynistic narrative”.

Thorpe has advocated for a national treaty to be given higher priority than the Voice referendum, which she has described as ineffectual. But in Victoria, Thorpe was sceptical of the Andrews government’s treaty announcement and labelled it a tokenistic gesture.

“Aboriginal people have lost faith in the Andrews Labor government, and in the Victorian treaty process,” she wrote in an Age opinion piece in October 2020.

Lisa Thorpe, in her candidate statement for the assembly election, cast doubt on the Victorian treaty process. While stating she supported the treaty, she added: “I believe the first step of Free prior and informed consent of every member of every one of our 38+ Sovereign Nations (in Victoria) and a consensus must be obtained.”

The assembly was established in 2018 and has nine members from the Melbourne region and three each from western, north-western, northern and eastern Victoria. Eleven seats were reserved for traditional owner groups.

The outgoing co-chair of the assembly, Aunty Geraldine Atkinson, sought a formal apology and complained to Greens leader Adam Bandt in 2021 after Thorpe allegedly verbally abused her and left her needing medical attention in a private meeting. Thorpe denied these allegations.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/lidia-thorpe-s-mum-and-allies-in-victorian-voice-bid-20230424-p5d2up.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744386

File: 82172e28ae04bdf⋯.jpg (265.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Richard_Marles_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 660c79e7dea3c8d⋯.jpg (208.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Defence_Strategic_Revi….jpg)

File: 9e431298a7af737⋯.jpg (438.4 KB,716x1276,179:319,Defence_Strategic_Review_2….jpg)

File: fcfa75438e68bab⋯.jpg (476.11 KB,923x909,923:909,Australia_s_Defence_Strate….jpg)

File: 531bd1fca26efb9⋯.jpg (597.35 KB,1040x1477,1040:1477,0001.jpg)

Defence Strategic Review calls for a more lethal military to handle China expansion

BEN PACKHAM and CAMERON STEWART - APRIL 24, 2023

1/2

The Australian Defence Force will be transformed into a more agile, lethal force, capable of mounting missile strikes and amphibious ­assaults far from the mainland under an ambitious blueprint to respond to China’s unprecedented military expansion.

But, despite “the most challenging strategic circumstances” since 1945, the government is ­refusing to increase the Defence budget for at least four years and has deferred key multibillion-dollar decisions on the future of the navy’s surface fleet.

The government’s Defence Strategic Review, released on Monday, warns Australia’s strategic circumstances have “radically” worsened, to the point that “we now face as a nation the prospect of major conflict in the region that directly threatens our national ­interest”.

It says the ADF, designed to deter low-level threats, is “no longer fit for purpose” in a more dangerous era when the US is no longer the region’s only major power.

“Intense China-United States competition is the defining feature of our region and our time,” the ­review says.

It adds that China has undergone “the largest and most ambitious” military build-up of any country in the past 80 years.

“Major power competition in our region has the potential to threaten our interests, including the potential for conflict,” it says.

The 110-page declassified ­version of the review foreshadows an overhaul of the structure of the ADF with a radically recast role for the army, which will operate new land-based missile systems and focus on amphibious operations in the island chains to the nation’s north.

It calls for a navy with greater firepower and foreshadows a shift towards smaller, heavily armed vessels. However, the review does not say whether this would involve the construction of a new fleet of fast corvettes.

It also gives no clarity on the ­future of the $45bn Hunter-class frigate program, or whether the government will buy more air ­warfare destroyers. The decision will be subject to a fresh review that will report to the government by the end of September.

The air force’s F35 joint strike fighters will be armed with new long-range anti-ship missiles and land-attack joint strike missiles, while the Australian-developed Ghost Bat drone will be prioritised in collaboration with the US.

The RAAF’s northern bases will be hardened, and developed as regional logistic hubs, with more fuel reserves and missile stocks. The government maintains the ­review protects the local defence industry by promising a continuous shipbuilding program in both Adelaide and Perth, and a fast-tracked domestic guided weapons enterprise, protecting jobs and strengthening national resilience.

The new strategy is not backed by additional funding over the four-year budget period, with $7.8bn reallocated from deprioritised programs, and $11bn already provisioned for in the existing ­Defence budget.

Anthony Albanese said higher Defence spending would be ­required beyond the forward estimates, but declined to say how much more taxpayers would have to pay to fund the overhaul of the nation’s military capabilities.

The review also includes a major revamp of Defence’s underperforming procurement arm to prioritise more cost-efficient outcomes and “abandon its pursuit of the perfect solution” with the aim of rapidly putting “minimum viable capabilities” in the hands of ADF personnel.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744393

File: 0a904dc8b240711⋯.jpg (433.11 KB,1040x1477,1040:1477,0021.jpg)

File: 1bab175bf702f56⋯.jpg (397.03 KB,1040x1477,1040:1477,0022.jpg)

File: 36fd6b9b875b3df⋯.jpg (396.67 KB,1040x1477,1040:1477,0023.jpg)

File: 1856924dafb9a75⋯.jpg (349.81 KB,1040x1477,1040:1477,0024.jpg)

File: de90ceff52c8a31⋯.jpg (408.46 KB,1040x1477,1040:1477,0025.jpg)

>>18744386

2/2

The government says the nation’s new strategic posture will contribute to collective security in the Indo-Pacific. China reacted angrily, accusing Australia of ­hyping “Chinese threat arguments” as an excuse to expand its military power. “We hope that some countries will not use China as an excuse to expand their military power, and do not hype groundless Chinese threat arguments,” said foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning.

The government has accepted all 62 recommendations in the public version of the review, but the fate of a further 46 recommendations proposed by the review’s leads, former defence minister Stephen Smith and former chief of the defence force Angus Houston, remains unclear.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the government would prioritise the acquisition of new long-range strike capabilities, the development of the northern bases, and getting new weapons technologies into service sooner. It will also invest in Defence recruitment and retention, and improve co-operation with regional defence forces.

“There are a lot of tough decisions which need to be made, but in doing so, we are making them in the best interest of our defence force and our nation,” Mr Marles said. “Work to implement the review starts today, ensuring our ADF and our defence personnel have the capability they need to keep Australians safe.”

The government has agreed to issue an inaugural national defence strategy in 2024, which will be updated every two years, replacing periodic white papers.

The review justifies the more forward-leading defence policy saying “the threat of the use of military force or coercion against Australia does not require invasion”, and the country’s national interests, including its trade routes, needed to be defended deep into the region.

“The rise of the ‘missile age’ in modern warfare, crystallised by the proliferation of long-range precision strike weapons, has radically reduced Australia’s geographic benefits, the comfort of distance and our qualitative regional capability edge,” it says.

While calling for greater military self-reliance, the review reaffirms the importance of Australia’s strategic partnership with the US, saying Australia must rely on America to defend against “higher level threats”.

It warns climate change is “amplifying our challenges”, requiring the ADF to support more humanitarian operations in the region and disaster relief at home, which have “negatively affected force preparedness, readiness and combat effectiveness”.

It says the ADF “must be the force of last resort for domestic aid to the civil community”.

Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie, a former SAS captain, attacked the review as an exercise in delays and “strategic double-speak”.

“We won’t see any new money. We see the government funding the DSR recommendations through offsets, cannibalising capability,” Mr Hastie said.

He said the deep cut to the army’s infantry fighting vehicle order, from 450 to 129, represented “a degradation of land power”.

The Prime Minister said the review would guide his government as it reshaped the ADF for the future.

“It demonstrates that in a world where challenges to our national security are always evolving, we cannot fall back on old assumptions,” Mr Albanese said.

“We must build and strengthen our security by seeking to shape the future rather than waiting for the future to shape us.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/the-defence-strategic-review-says-australia-is-not-ready-for-conflict-with-china/news-story/7fce64d7c6a0de4c6c1df67900299e8f

https://www.defence.gov.au/about/reviews-inquiries/defence-strategic-review

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744438

File: c488de3a8ec6068⋯.jpg (2.87 MB,2724x1816,3:2,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>18744386

Defence Strategic Review: Beijing accuses Canberra of hyping ‘China threat arguments’ to increase military budget

WILL GLASGOW - APRIL 24, 2023

Beijing has accused Australia of hyping “Chinese threat arguments” as an “excuse” to expand its military power.

In the first response to the Albanese government’s Defence Strategic Review, Beijing said China had always pursued a purely “defensive” national defence policy.

“We are committed to maintaining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific and the world, and do not pose a threat to any country,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said on Monday night.

“We hope that some countries will not use China as an excuse to expand their military power, and do not hype groundless Chinese threat arguments.”

The Albanese government’s new defence blueprint singled out China’s fast-paced military build-up as the main driver for the rethink.

“This build-up is occurring without transparency or reassurance to the Indo-Pacific region of China’s strategic intent,” the review said.

In March, China announced a more than 7 per cent increase in its military spending to $330bn, towering over its neighbours, though still significantly lagging the US. Analysts estimate the true size of China’s military spending is larger than the official number.

Over the weekend, Beijing launched a blitz of domestic propaganda to celebrate the 74th anniversary of the People’s Liberation Army navy. State broadcaster CCTV said it was “certain” that Beijing would build more aircraft carriers and other next generation military hardware as Chinese analysts said the country was erecting a “maritime ‘Great Wall’” to safeguard its sovereignty.

The military propaganda drive came amid a chorus of international figures — including South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol and EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell — calling for Beijing to restrain from using force to change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.

Richard Maude, a former senior Australian diplomat, said a “classic security dilemma” was playing out across the Indo-Pacific.

“And the problem, of course, is that China doesn’t accept that it is making other countries insecure, or that it bears any responsibility for this deteriorating strategic environment. It sees instead a US-led effort to contain and suppress China,” said Mr Maude, the executive director of policy at Asia Society Australia.

“That total mismatch of perception and outlook is undeniably raising risk in the region. And managing that has become the great challenge of our age.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744441

File: 2e2337629182902⋯.jpg (43.4 KB,600x487,600:487,Foreign_Ministry_Spokesper….jpg)

>>18744438

2/2

In March, in unusually direct comments, President Xi Jinping said “Western countries – led by the US – had implemented all-round containment, encirclement and suppression against us”.

The Albanese government has attempted to limit the extent of China’s upset about the defence review.

Chinese officials in Canberra were one of dozens of countries briefed on the strategic review before it was released at noon on Monday (AEST).

During a press conference announcing the release of the document, neither Prime Minister Anthony Albanese nor Defence Minister Richard Marles once mentioned China.

In one of only three passages directly naming China, the review said “a stable relationship between Australia and China is in the interests of both countries and the broader region”.

“Australia will continue to co-operate with China where we can, disagree where we must, manage our differences wisely, and, above all else, engage in and vigorously pursue our own national interest,” it said.

This week the first industry-wide government-backed business delegation is visiting China since the Covid-19 pandemic began.

Chinese media has given widespread coverage of the trip, which is being led by Australia China Business Council president David Olsson.

Chen Hong, president of the Chinese Association of Australian Studies, said Canberra’s review had failed to grasp the “defensive, not offensive” nature of China’s military build-up.

“The report is largely shaped by Washington’s strategies rather than based upon an accurate assessment of Australia’s relationship with China,” Professor Chen told The Australian.

“China has never threatened Australia,” added the Shanghai-based director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University.

Professor Chen, the most prolific commentator about Australia in China’s state media, praised the Albanese government’s “toned-down” rhetoric, which he said was a huge improvement from the Morrison government.

He said, despite the fresh disagreement over the defence update, Australia and China’s trade relationship would improve, suggesting Beijing would end the black-listing of more of the Australian exports previously worth $20bn a year.

“Both sides have been starting a kind of quite regular and open and direct conversation channel,” he added.

Mr Maude said the defence strategy “shouldn’t be a dramatic surprise to anyone, including Beijing” and it was unlikely to disturb the modest improvement in the bilateral relationship.

“I don’t think we’ll see any significant retreat from the gradual stabilisation,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/defence-strategic-review-beijing-accuses-canberra-of-hyping-china-threat-arguments-to-increase-military-budget/news-story/2610a7eb4039af24c8b9c1642ae2c6a9

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on April 24, 2023

AFP: I got a question on Australia. Australia today unveiled its biggest military shakeup in decades. Australia said it needs to spend more money on defense as China’s military challenges regional security. So what’s your reaction?

Mao Ning: China pursues a defensive national defense policy and stays committed to peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific and the wider world. We do not pose a challenge to any country. We hope certain countries will not use China as an excuse for military build-up and will refrain from hyping up the “China threat” narrative.

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/202304/t20230424_11064804.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744473

File: f456aee2ce72898⋯.jpg (151.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ambassador_Shingo_Yamagami….jpg)

Australian ‘energy supply risk’ worries Japan: ambassador Shingo Yamagami

PAUL KELLY - APRIL 23, 2023

1/2

The outgoing and outspoken Japanese ambassador to Australia, Shingo Yamagami, has warned in a departure interview that “sovereign risk” is now an active concern among Japan’s corporates and energy companies which fear the reliability of Australia as an energy supplier.

“There shouldn’t be any misunderstanding as to the depths of concern held by Japanese companies because on repeated occasions those concerns have been conveyed to the Australian government,” the ambassador told The Australian.

“Probably for the first time, this word of sovereign risk is coming from the lips of Japanese business leaders, in discussion in boardrooms in Tokyo, and this is something we have to address.

“There is a staggering reliance by Japan on Australia when it comes to energy security. I have this magic number 764 – among Japan’s imports 70 per cent of coal comes from Australia, 60 per cent of iron ore and 40 per cent of gas comes from Australia. But what happening in recent months created an increasing amount of concern on the part of Japanese gas companies and in the trade houses and steel companies.”

Mr Yamagami denied he was being recalled early by Tokyo, branding such claims “malicious”. He said: “Some people are saying my tenure is cut short because I have been maverick and too hawkish on China. Nothing could be further from the truth.”

Nevertheless, Foreign Minister Penny Wong had concerns about the ambassador’s public statements on China and he was cautioned by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade about his public remarks.

Asked about the Albanese government’s response to Japan’s energy security fears, he said: “We have received assurances on repeated occasions – even at the level of prime minister – that Australia would remain a stable, reliable source of energy to Japan. So what remains to be seen is how this general principle on the part of the Australian government is going to be reflected in specific measures and policies.”

In short, reassurances are fine but what matters is action, what the Labor government does. In this sense, Mr Yamagami, on his departure, is putting the government on notice.

Uncertainty over Labor’s gas policy has been fuelled by multiple decisions, ministerial comments and pressure from unions and manufacturers to divert gas to the domestic market. Issues include the imposition of gas price caps and a “reasonable” pricing policy, state government hostility to gas extraction, the “safeguards mechanism” deal with the Greens as a potential inhibition on gas development, changes to the Domestic Gas Security Mechanism allowing a domestic gas “trigger” to be used as a last resort and the imminent announcement of higher taxes from review of the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax.

Mr Yamagami said criticism of Australian policy several weeks ago by Inpex Corporation chief Takayuki Ueda in a speech that shocked senior ministers should “not be underestimated and under-valued”.

Mr Ueda alleged Australia’s “quiet quitting” of the LNG business had sinister consequences. He said the investment climate in Australia seemed to be “deteriorating”, extra gas supply was needed, government intervention was counter-productive and Australia’s decisions could prejudice both the climate transition and energy security in the region.

“Mr Ueda’s statement speaks about the depth of concern shared by Japanese actors,” the ambassador said. Mr Yamagami said he had known Mr Ueda for many years, that he had a “rich experience” in both the public and private sector and claims his comments were not shared in Japan were “completely wrong”.

He said energy and resources nationalism in Australia was now “a concern held by a number of Japanese companies”, with many representatives having “come to me and expressed their concern, some calling it a tilt to energy nationalism. That is something we don’t want to see.”

These remarks reflect a cultural divide between the nations, with Japan highly sensitive to energy supply and prone to overreact to Australia’s policy changes while the Albanese government seems impatient and irritated at Japan’s protests.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744477

File: 121ed023517966b⋯.jpg (96.57 KB,1200x675,16:9,Chinese_ambassador_Xiao_Qi….jpg)

>>18744473

2/2

Mr Yamagami was optimistic at the Australia-Japan relationship. “It has never been better,” he said. “I am bloody lucky to be ambassador at this juncture.”

He said there was an “unprecedented level of interaction” at prime ministerial level. Anthony Albanese went to Japan twice last year. Japan PM Fumio Kishida visited last year and will visit Australia again for the upcoming Quad meeting. Mr Albanese will visit Japan in the near future for the G7 meetings.

“We have agreed to consult on contingencies in this region – that shows how far our two countries have come,” Mr Yamagami said.

He repudiated criticism of his past remarks on China. “It is the right and duty of the Japanese ambassador to convey Japanese perspective to our friends in Australia,” he said. “I am not here to please everybody. That is impossible. Some of my remarks might not be agreeable to all Australians. By and large, I have received a very favourable response.

“I think honest, candid and to the point discussion is essential. In this regard I am a bit concerned about the narrowing of language space in Australia.”

He gave two examples. Some of the hostile reaction to the recent Sydney Morning Herald special articles on China that covered military conflict possibilities across the Taiwan Strait “because that is something we have to discuss in a candid, honest fashion”. The second was a statement made by my “good friend”, the Director-General of ASIO, Mike Burgess, that he faced pressures in his job dealing with the threats from foreign espionage and interference.

Mr Yamagami came under fire earlier this year when he warned Australia to be “vigilant” against China’s military assertiveness. China’s ambassador, Xiao Qian, hit back, saying his Japanese counterpart was not doing his job “properly” and raised the spectre of Japan launching a military invasion of Australia given the World War II legacy.

On China, Mr Yamagami issued a cautionary warning about Australian attitudes and the nature of our China debate. “I am pleased dialogue between Australia and China has resumed,” he said. “Japan wants a stable and constructive relationship with China as well” but the way to manage China was “to stick to principles, you need to keep standing tall”. He had “no intention” of interfering with any Australian government decision but it was “important” for Australia and Japan “to stay on the same page” given the strategic challenge.

In relation to his departure, he said: “I am saddened and dismayed to see comments made by a limited number of people linking my statements to my tenure. My predecessor stayed here less than two years. Did anybody tell him his tenure is getting cut short? Nobody. I have been here for two years and four months.”

His final remark was optimistic: Australia has long enjoyed a “special status” in the minds of Japan’s energy and resource players and this offers a basis of trust to resolve current difficulties.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australian-energy-supply-risk-worries-japan-ambassador-shingo-yamagami/news-story/e3d3519e14e63f807632443e592e468b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744491

File: bd50c3f4d31d2b2⋯.jpg (168.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

File: 56b2bbc6c877623⋯.jpg (252.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,New_Zealand_Prime_Minister….jpg)

>>18670474

Kiwis join clan as Hipkins backs AUKUS

JESS MALCOLM - APRIL 23, 2023

New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has reassured Australia that his country remains firmly behind AUKUS, endorsing the move to acquire nuclear-­powered submarine capabilities as necessary to protect the Indo-Pacific against emerging threats to a global rules-based order.

Following bilateral talks with Anthony Albanese in Brisbane on Sunday, Mr Hipkins threw his support behind Australia’s plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines from the US and Britain after he received assurances the deal would not impact Australia’s commitment to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

Mr Hipkins travelled to Australia to meet Mr Albanese to announce new citizenship arrange­ments between Australia and New Zealand, paving the way for more than 350,000 Kiwis living in Australia to become eligible for citizenship from July 1.

“New Zealand, like Australia, is clear-eyed that there is a challenging strategic environment in the Indo-Pacific region,” Mr Hipkins said. “We both want a stable, secure and resilient region. And New Zealand agrees with the AUKUS partners that the collective objective needs to be the delivery of peace and stability and preservation of an international rules-based system in our region.

“We have a long and positive history of working together on these matters, and I also acknowledge our ongoing joint commitment to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and I welcome your assurance that nothing in the AUKUS arrangement alters Australia‘s commitment to that.”

The Prime Minister said Mr Hipkins had received briefings on AUKUS ahead of its formal announcement in San Diego in April and affirmed relations between the two countries remained very strong. Mr Albanese also praised Mr Hipkins for his commitment to the Pacific Islands Forum, and said New Zealand had played an important role in holding the key diplomatic body together after Kiribati withdrew its membership.

“We certainly have a very strong relationship and prior to the announcement in San Diego, the Prime Minister was kept informed, as you would expect. And today we had another discussion about peace, security and stability in the region,” Mr Albanese said.

“We know that when you have a body made up of more than a dozen countries, once you have a withdrawal, that can very easily lead to a second withdrawal, a third, a fourth. And it is important that the Pacific Island family stay together. New Zealand has played a very important role there.”

The two leaders on Sunday also unveiled previously unmarked graves of 10 New Zealand World War I veterans and paid tribute to past and serving soldiers in the lead up to Anzac Day.

The trip marked Mr Hipkins’ second visit across the ditch after he came to meet Mr Albanese for an introductory working lunch in February after he unexpectedly took over from Jacinda Ardern following her snap retirement.

Announcing new citizenship changes, Mr Albanese said the arrangements would normalise relations between the nations and help bolster diplomatic ties. “I see this as a commonsense approach and … consistent with the rules in place already for Australians in New Zealand,” he said.

The move marks a reversal from laws brought in under the Howard government in 2001 that forced New Zealanders on to special visas letting them work but restricting their entitlements.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/kiwis-join-clan-as-hipkins-backs-aukus/news-story/36dddd3aa385b79933653c02f9bff0c2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744498

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18719425

>>18723436

>>18729148

WA Premier Mark McGowan raised cases of detained Australians during China trip

David Weber - 24 April 2023

Western Australia Premier Mark McGowan said he raised the cases of two detained Australians while he was on a five-day trip in China.

Journalist Cheng Lei has been detained in China since August 2020 and is accused of leaking state secrets, while writer Yang Hengjun was arrested in January 2019 and the case against him has never been publicly disclosed.

Mr McGowan said the Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Ma Zhaoxu reached out and asked if he wanted to have a meeting, and he said yes.

"Prior to having the meeting, I contacted the federal government to say is there anything they'd like me to raise," he said.

"So I went to the meeting, I had a long and productive meeting with Minister Ma, the best part of an hour.

"On a couple of occasions, I raised the matters surrounding those people and said it would be in the interests of both countries if the matter could be resolved as soon as possible and if they could be returned to Australia."

Mr McGowan said the vice minister was aware of the issues.

"He said it was helpful that I raised it and that he would look further into the matter." Mr McGowan said.

"Obviously people raising the issue, like myself, hopefully is helpful in getting the matter resolved."

The visit was Mr McGowan's first to China since the coronavirus pandemic.

The premier said he also had a receptive audience in China when he raised the issue of tariffs on Australian products.

Mr McGowan said he spoke on behalf of all Australian producers, and it was a topic of discussion with economic agencies, and the vice minister for foreign affairs.

"The argument basically is this, the tariffs they put on our goods basically increases the price the wine and crayfish and beef in China, and it hurts producers here.

"So no-one is a winner and I think there's broad acceptance of that.

"Getting through bureaucratic processes and so forth in China probably takes some time but hopefully they'll be resolved soon."

The premier also sought to correct reports that he had called for the Albanese government to consider holding national cabinet in China.

Mr McGowan said he had suggested that the prime minister consider taking a delegation of premiers and chief ministers to China, but had never said there should be a meeting of national cabinet.

He said he had expressly ruled it out when asked and had texted the prime minister to ensure he knew the claim was misreported.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-23/mcgowan-raised-cases-of-detained-australians-during-china-trip/102257918

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-O3Bg-zLvk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744576

File: 2dcc93440fbfd0b⋯.jpg (846.6 KB,2835x1946,405:278,Former_governor_general_Pe….jpg)

File: 5536e72a7a51734⋯.jpg (1.1 MB,5000x2813,5000:2813,Beth_Heinrich_sought_redre….jpg)

>>18472663 (pb)

Ex-governor-general Peter Hollingworth 'fit for ministry' despite misconduct, Anglican Church board finds

Yara Murray-Atfield - 24 April 2023

1/3

An Anglican Church investigation has found former governor-general Peter Hollingworth committed misconduct by knowingly allowing paedophiles to remain in the church when he was Brisbane archbishop, but is "fit for ministry" if he apologises to two victim-survivors.

The Professional Standards Board of the Anglican Church has been considering whether Dr Hollingworth, who remains a bishop, should be defrocked over his handling of abuse cases while he was archbishop in the 1990s.

It found that Dr Hollingworth committed misconduct by allowing two priests he knew had sexually abused children to remain in the church.

However, it found he should be allowed to retain his holy orders.

The tribunal recommended the Anglican archbishop of Melbourne reprimand Dr Hollingworth for his decision to retain abusive priests in the ministry, and apologise to two victim-survivors.

"There will be no unacceptable risk of harm to any person if the Respondent [Dr Hollingworth] continues to hold the role office or position he currently holds," the board found.

Dr Hollingworth has accepted the board's recommendations.

"I made mistakes and I cannot undo them. But I committed no crimes," he said.

"There is no evidence that there was any abuse because of any decisions I made, or did not make."

In a statement, Dr Hollingworth said there had hardly been a day when he had not "reflected on these matters and my failings".

"I had devoted my life to social justice, pastoral care and healing but I had little experience in dealing with the child abuse issues. Like other church leaders, I was unduly influenced by the advice of lawyers and insurance companies," he said.

In a statement, Melbourne Archbishop Philip Freier said he would carry out the board's recommendations and would publish a further written statement "in the coming days".

"It is important to note that the Diocese has no influence over the complaints process. I have not been involved in any deliberations or investigation," he said.

The body handling the process — Kooyoora — was accused of making the investigation too secretive, with one abuse survivor describing it as "uninviting and non-transparent."

The hearing, which began on February 6 and ran for four days, was closed to the public and the media.

Finding follows years of campaigning by abuse survivors

In 2018, the ABC revealed that Dr Hollingworth was the subject of multiple complaints from survivors of abuse at the hands of Anglican clergy and teaching staff in the Brisbane diocese, where Dr Hollingworth served as archbishop in the 1990s.

Dr Hollingworth resigned as governor-general in 2003 after a series of revelations over his handling of sexual abuse allegations while he was the archbishop of Brisbane.

A 2002 inquiry by the Anglican Diocese of Brisbane found Dr Hollingworth allowed paedophile priest John Elliot to continue working until retirement, despite Elliot admitting to Dr Hollingworth he had sexually abused two boys.

The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse found Dr Hollingworth made a "serious error of judgement", and failed to take into account a psychiatrist's advice that Elliot was an "untreatable" paedophile who posed a risk of reoffending.

In the months following the report, Melbourne Archbishop Philip Freier renewed Dr Hollingworth's permission to officiate in the church — a decision which infuriated survivors.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744585

File: 21e9c3985db014d⋯.jpg (1.37 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Beth_Heinrich_was_a_compla….jpg)

File: 29466e9bb53c9e8⋯.jpg (510.83 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Australians_have_known_for….jpg)

>>18744576

2/3

Misconduct committed by allowing paedophile priests to remain in church, panel finds

The panel investigated 10 allegations made against Dr Hollingworth, relating to sexual abuse perpetrated by men associated with the church.

In line with the 2002 inquiry, the standards panel found Dr Hollingworth had committed misconduct by permitting Elliot to remain in ministry when he knew he posed a risk to the safety and wellbeing of children.

Dr Hollingworth was also found to have committed misconduct by permitting cleric Donald Shearman "who he knew had sexually assaulted a child, to retain his permission to officiate".

He was also found to have committed misconduct by making "an unreasonable and dangerous appointment to a position of responsibility and authority within the Anglican Church", when he appointed Gilbert Case to the role of executive director of the Anglican Schools Commission in 2000.

The panel found Dr Hollingworth knew Mr Case had ignored a complaint of abuse at a Queensland school.

However, it found "that information did not come to his mind at the time the appointment was up for consideration" and said while the matter was not trivial, "we cannot regard this act of misconduct as being as serious as the others".

It also found Dr Hollingworth "made a statement that was unsatisfactory, insensitive and that he should have foreseen was likely to be distressing" when he made comments to ABC program Australian Story about one of Shearman's victims, Beth Heinrich.

Ms Heinrich has been campaigning for Dr Hollingworth to lose his holy orders, also known as being defrocked, due to his conduct while he was archbishop.

The panel recommended Dr Hollingworth apologise to her "for his decision to retain Donald Shearman in ministry despite his knowledge of Donald Shearman's sexual abuse of Ms Heinrich, for his failure to understand and give proper weight to the harm suffered by Ms Heinrich as a result of Donald Shearman's abuse, and for his harsh, dismissive and insensitive words about Ms Heinrich as broadcast on 'Australian Story' in February 2002".

It also found Dr Hollingworth committed misconduct when he wrote a letter to the brother of one of Elliot's victims described as "being inappropriate and insensitive".

However, it found that he had accurately stated in the letter that Elliot had been "brought under the discipline of the Church".

It recommended he apologise that victim, given the pseudonym BYB, and his family "for his two decisions to retain John Elliot in ministry despite his knowledge of sexual abuse committed by John Elliot, for his failure to understand and give proper weight to the harm suffered by John Elliot's victims, and for his harsh and insensitive letter to BYB's brother of 11 September 1995".

Five years ago, the ABC revealed that a former Kooyoora director of professional standards told a sexual abuse survivor there was "… more than enough justification to prove [Dr Hollingworth's] unfitness to hold Holy Orders".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744592

File: 7f1d4808f20bf03⋯.jpg (126.14 KB,1280x720,16:9,Survivor_Beth_Heinrich_was….jpg)

File: 17eb6376891fcee⋯.jpg (97.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Hollingworth.jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>18744585

3/3

Dr Hollingworth 'repeatedly admitted those mistakes and made multiple apologies'

The standards board dismissed three of the allegations made against Dr Hollingworth.

It dismissed an allegation that Dr Hollingworth "intentionally or recklessly permitted his lawyers to send a letter to the Brisbane Inquiry which contained a false or misleading statement that the abuse committed by Elliot had been a "single, isolated incident" when in fact there had been multiple abusive incidents".

It also dismissed an allegation that during an interview with ABC program Australian story in 2002 he "intentionally or recklessly made an inaccurate public statement that he had never met any of the family of a boy abused by John Elliot when in fact he had met members of the family".

It dismissed an allegation that Dr Hollingworth failed to make proper efforts to provide care and support to two young people who were sexually assaulted by Kevin Guy, a former Toowoomba Preparatory School employee who died after being charged with sexual offences.

In his statement, Dr Hollingworth said he had kept his silence since the investigation began in 2017 out of respect to the process.

"The investigations and hearings by the Professional Standards Board have been long and painful for everyone involved – the complainants, their families and me and my family," he said.

He noted that the allegations presented to the board had been considered by the Anglican Diocese of Brisbane Board of Inquiry in 2003, Queensland Police and two separate hearings of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.

"None of those inquiries recommended sanctions, even though the Royal Commission was critical of me on some matters. I have repeatedly admitted those mistakes and made multiple apologies," he said.

He said that "it is good that the Royal Commission and similar inquiries have led to changes in the law, attitudes and processes in churches and other institutions".

"Survivors of abuse have a much better chance of being heard and achieving justice than they did last century," he said.

"And most importantly, the momentum achieved on this issue means we can reasonably believe that the incidence of abuse in institutions has been dramatically reduced, even eliminated."

The four members of the panel were lawyer Robin Brett KC, former Family Court of Australia judge Paul Cronin, Reverend Keiron Jones and Kooyoora board member Marie Davis.

"We believe the Respondent's statement before the Royal Commission that since leaving the office of Governor-General he has come to a proper understanding of the true effects of sexual abuse upon children," the panel wrote in its findings.

"We have taken into account also that he at no time attempted to conceal his actions: he explained clearly to both Ms Heinrich and BYB and his family the decisions he had made and his reasons for making them.

"Those decisions were wrong, but as we have said before, they were honest attempts to do what was right."

The panel said Dr Hollingworth should remain in his current roles as priest at the St George's church in Melbourne.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-24/peter-hollingworth-anglican-panel-former-governor-general/102259034

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744643

File: f678893451497e3⋯.jpg (353.84 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Ben_Roberts_Smith_leaves_t….jpg)

File: bf972c42e290877⋯.jpg (1.74 MB,3652x2659,3652:2659,Arthur_Moses_told_the_cour….jpg)

Ben Roberts-Smith seeks access to military watchdog’s diary entries

Michaela Whitbourn - April 24, 2023

1/2

War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith is locked in a legal fight with the Defence Force watchdog over access to diary entries that he alleges may reveal meetings with a high-profile investigative journalist who is at the centre of his defamation case.

At a hearing of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Sydney on Monday, Roberts-Smith’s lawyers urged Justice Thomas Thawley to overturn a decision blocking his freedom of information request for diary entries belonging to the head of an inquiry into alleged misconduct by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan.

The inquiry was conducted by the military watchdog, the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force.

Arthur Moses, SC, acting for Roberts-Smith, said his client sought access to the documents more than five years ago. He was seeking a review of a decision of the Information Commissioner, which upheld a previous decision that the diary entries were exempt from disclosure.

Moses said the diary entries referred to two meetings, in March and July 2017, between NSW Supreme Court Justice and Major-General Paul Brereton, an Assistant Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force, and an “unidentified person”.

Brereton headed a royal commission-style inquiry into allegations of misconduct, including war crimes, against a small number of Special Air Service Regiment soldiers who served in Afghanistan. The inquiry was commissioned in 2016 and a report was released publicly in 2020.

Roberts-Smith, a former SAS corporal, has not been charged with any offence as a result of that inquiry and has denied he engaged in wrongdoing while serving in Afghanistan.

Brereton has since been appointed the inaugural head of the National Anti-Corruption Commission.

Moses said the Roberts-Smith team’s “case theory” was that the unnamed person in Brereton’s diary was Chris Masters, an award-winning investigative journalist whose book on Australian special forces in Afghanistan, No Front Line, was published in October 2017.

Masters is also one of the authors of the articles at the centre of Roberts-Smith’s long-running defamation suit.

The Defence department had granted Masters “special access to members of the SAS and commandos, and to classified defence information” for the purposes of his book, Moses said.

He said Masters agreed in a deed with the Commonwealth not to disclose classified information.

“The request for those diary entries formed part of a larger request [for] documents evidencing dealings between other senior figures of the Australian Defence Force and Mr Masters, as well as any documents provided to Mr Masters by the ADF,” Moses said.

Christine Ernst, the barrister for the Inspector-General of the ADF, told the hearing that “no inference as to the identity of the confidential source can be drawn from the response to the FOI request” and “no evidence has been advanced … that the identity of the source is not confidential”.

The watchdog was legally permitted to conduct inquiries “in private, including entirely in private, and in my submission it would undermine the force of that [law] … if the identities of people who participated could be revealed by the making of an FOI request”, Ernst said.

Ernst said the public interest in “encouraging participation in future IGADF inquiries … would be undermined if the identities of persons, or what they said, could be revealed by the making of an FOI request”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744647

File: e9aa1b20a07ecd8⋯.jpg (193.95 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_in_2010_….jpg)

File: 56bd10128768616⋯.jpg (167.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_and_Arth….jpg)

>>18744643

2/2

Moses alleged Masters “reported about the Brereton inquiry on a number of occasions after his [alleged] meetings with the Assistant IGADF, in which he claimed he had exclusive information about what the inquiry was looking into, including but not limited to allegations said to be related to [Roberts-Smith].

“Whether the Assistant IGADF, Major-General Brereton, met with Mr Masters around this time is a matter of legitimate public interest.”

Moses submitted that “the dominant purpose” of the meetings would help guide the AAT in making its decision.

He raised questions about whether Masters might have provided information “relevant to … the inquiry”, or whether “Mr Masters was being briefed about the progress of the inquiry for the purpose of his reporting in The Sydney Morning Herald [and The Age] or his book; and one queries, if that was the case, why he was being given special treatment.”

Masters is not a party to the dispute. Moses said Masters’ view on Roberts-Smith’s FOI request was not known.

Roberts-Smith launched defamation proceedings against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times in August 2018 over a series of six articles, published between June and August that year. Half of the articles are online versions of print stories.

The authors of the articles – Nick McKenzie, an investigative journalist at The Age, and Masters – are also named as respondents to the lawsuit.

Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko concluded public hearings in the defamation case on July 27 last year, after 110 days, 41 witnesses and more than $25 million in legal costs.

Roberts-Smith alleges the newspapers wrongly accused him of war crimes in Afghanistan, bullying a fellow soldier, and an act of domestic violence against a former lover.

Besanko will rule on whether those meanings were conveyed by the articles and whether Roberts-Smith was identified by the reports, four of which did not name him. The newspapers and journalists say the first four articles did not identify him and none conveyed the meanings alleged, but they seek to rely chiefly on a defence of truth to any of the meanings found to have been conveyed.

Thawley will deliver his decision on the FOI case at a later date. The federal government announced last year that it would disband the AAT, which is hearing this dispute, and set up a new federal administrative review body. Legislation to set up that body is expected to be introduced later this year.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/ben-roberts-smith-seeks-access-to-military-watchdog-s-diary-entries-20230424-p5d2r4.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744677

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

LIVE: Gallipoli Dawn Service | Anzac Day 2023 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST

ABC Australia

Apr 25, 2023

Join us as we go LIVE for the Anzac Day 2023 Gallipoli Dawn Service from 12:30pm AEST on Tuesday, April 25.

No matter where you are in the world, let us come together to commemorate Anzac Day 2023. #AnzacDay #AnzacDay2023 #DawnService

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SmQxKQU2uI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744686

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Anzac Day Dawn Service 2023

ShrineMelbourne

Apr 25, 2023

Anzac Day Dawn Service 2023, live from Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance.

Come together to pause and reflect on the service and sacrifice of generations of Victorians, and all those who suffer the consequences of war.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwWLIZ9Cilo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744705

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Live: Anzac Day 2023 Sydney Dawn Service | April 25, 2023 from 4:25am AEST

9 News Australia

Apr 25, 2023

Join 9News this Anzac Day for live coverage of Sydney's dawn service at the Martin Place Cenotaph from 4.30am, and the national dawn service at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra from 5:30am.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFtTMI1bVTM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744714

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Anzac Day 2023: Currumbin Dawn Service and special Sunrise coverage

7NEWS Australia

Apr 25, 2023

Join Sunrise as we honour our fallen diggers and commemorate the Anzac spirit, starting with the Dawn Service live from Currumbin on the Gold Coast, followed by special coverage with reporters across Australia and around the world.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg7KgO5h1wY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744726

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

LIVE: Melbourne March | Anzac Day 2023 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST

ABC Australia

Apr 25, 2023

Join us as we go LIVE for the Anzac Day 2023 Melbourne March from 9:00am AEST on Monday, April 25.

No matter where you are in the world, let us come together to commemorate Anzac Day 2023. #AnzacDay #AnzacDay2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3ENseQKWXU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18744759

File: 3bd9be49d1c26fc⋯.mp4 (10.15 MB,640x360,16:9,The_Last_Post.mp4)

ANZAC Day 2023

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old;

Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.

At the going down of the sun and in the morning

We will remember them.

Lest We Forget.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749439

File: f26c923bfa0a79a⋯.jpg (124.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,Two_people_perform_a_Hongi….jpg)

File: 7e7b4f3a5b8719c⋯.jpg (234.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Cadets_are_seen_at_the_ser….jpg)

File: 17716b580bb7091⋯.jpg (150.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_family_stand_together_at….jpg)

File: 92d89e1534e485f⋯.jpg (176.83 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anzac_Day_Dawn_Service_at_….jpg)

Powerful images as Aussies commemorate Anzac Day

Thousands of Australians across the country and the world are marking the most solemn day on the nation’s calendar.

Madeleine Achenza - April 25, 2023

1/4

Australians and New Zealanders have gathered to commemorate the 108th anniversary of the landing of Anzac troops at Gallipoli in World War I.

Services were held in cities and towns, big and small, to mark Anzac Day - the most solemn day on the Australian calendar.

There were emotional scenes with young and old gathered to pay tribute to fallen servicemen and women.

As first light broke over the horizon of capital cities, the crowds filled into RSLs and community halls across the country for tea, coffee and Anzac biscuits.

Over 7,000 current serving members and veterans, some from as far back as the Second World War, marched from Martin Place to the Anzac Memorial in Hyde Park Sydney from 9am.

War Memorial, Adelaide

Thousands gathered at the Adelaide dawn service including Premier Peter Malinauskas and Senator Penny Wong to lay wreaths.

Shrine of Remembrance, Brisbane

In Brisbane, thousands flocked to the Shrine of Remembrance to reflect on Anzac Day.

Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk wore a poppy pinned to the lapel of her coat for the early morning service.

Sydney

A small crowd were given the lucky opportunity to ring in the national day of remembrance on the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

The harbour was aglow with golden light as the bugle played the last post from above the city skyline.

NSW Premier Chris Minns attended his first service after being elected last month, before rushing down south to attend the march and commemoration at the local RSL in his electorate of Kogarah.

The Sydney Maori Choir, composed of New Zealanders now living in Sydney, sing a haunting rendition of the Song of Sorrow in tribute to Australian and New Zealand soldiers who have died fighting for their country.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749440

File: 4b2f482257eb483⋯.jpg (202.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anzac_Day_Dawn_Service_at_….jpg)

File: 6a3c67bf2277314⋯.jpg (148.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anzac_Day_Dawn_Service_at_….jpg)

File: f86015513f24bc2⋯.jpg (242.78 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anzac_Day_Dawn_Service_at_….jpg)

File: bc93fad7503732b⋯.jpg (148.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,People_drenched_in_the_pur….jpg)

>>18749439

2/4

Australian War Memorial, Canberra

In Canberra, about 30,000 gathered before first light the Australian War Memorial despite the mercury reaching an icy 6C.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told the crowd of thousands who came out in the cold to pay their respects during his first Anzac Day address as the nation’s leader.

“Of course, many did come home, only to face another battle within. A battle that, tragically, is not always won,” he said.

“If we are to truly honour our veterans, we owe them something more than just gratitude. Just as they stepped up for us, we must step up for them.”

The bugle played out at first light in the nation’s capital in a rendition of the Last Post before a minute’s silence fell over the crowd.

NSW Minister for Veterans David Harris said Anzac Day was an opportunity for the community to pay respects to those who have served our country.

“It was heartening to see the large crowd honouring the Anzac spirit and paying tribute to the service and sacrifice of our veterans,” he said.

Later, thousands lined Anzac Parade in Canberra to watch on and show their support for veterans in the annual march.

Governor-General David Hurley, who also marched in the parade alongside the past servicemen and women, addressed the gathering.

In his speech, he commemorated the 30th anniversary of ADF operations in Somalia and the 50th anniversary of the end of Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War.

“Vietnam and Somalian operations were different in scale, duration and intensity, but they were very strongly linked,” he told the crowd.

“They were linked because it was Vietnam veterans who taught the Somalia generation of servicemen and women our military skills and what it means to wear your country’s uniform.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749442

File: fedc848f8b3d4c0⋯.jpg (134.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Thousands_gather_at_the_Sh….jpg)

File: c6f5dc62c24804f⋯.jpg (122.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Poppies_adorn_wreaths_and_….jpg)

File: c9df1cf5abdebbe⋯.jpg (277.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Thousands_gathered_at_Bond….jpg)

File: 6802c86e616b6ef⋯.jpg (75.31 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>18749440

3/4

US ambassador Caroline Kennedy, former prime minister Tony Abbott, chief of the defence force Angus Campbell and former defence minister and now chairman of the Council of the Australian War Memorial, Kim Beazely were also in attendance.

Mr Hurley also reflected on the intergenerational links that bind the nation’s troops.

“Each generation learns from those who have served before. Just as the Vietnam generation learned from those who served in the second world war, Korea and the Malay Peninsula,” he said.

“We are also linked by the shared experience of serving together. Perhaps that emotion we refer to as mateship, marching with your mates is one of the most satisfying of life’s experiences.”

Free public transport is being offered to all current and former Australian Defence Force members and their families.

Spectators can head into Elizabeth Street in Sydney to pay tribute to servicemen and their families as they make their way through the CBD alongside marching bands and bag pipes.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander service people will be recognised at the Coloured Digger March at 1.30pm in Redfern.

“In the early light of dawn when the Australian and New Zealand forces landed on Gallipoli on 25 April 1915, little did they know they were making history, forming a legend that would resonate for generations to come,” Veterans’ Affairs Minister Matt Keogh said.

“Even though more than a century has passed, we will continue to honour their service, share their stories and remember their names.”

Mr Keogh will represent Australia at the Gallipoli service, where some 60,000 Australians served during the eight-month campaign and where more than 8700 died.

Services will also be held internationally on the Gallipoli Peninsula, Villers-Bretonneux in France, Hellfire Pass in Thailand, Sandakan in Malaysia and in Papua New Guinea as well as New Zealand.

Veterans, and in some cases their descendants, will take part in marches, before games of two-up will take place at many veteran catch-ups.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749444

File: 377cd09a383188e⋯.jpg (185.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,Thousands_have_gathered_to….jpg)

File: 83ff8dec5f22a90⋯.jpg (172.6 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lance_Coporal_A_Davis_on_t….jpg)

File: f77a4122e0fa980⋯.jpg (113.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Shrine_of_Remembrance_….jpg)

File: 436f9b54cfa5641⋯.jpg (389.94 KB,1417x698,1417:698,Do_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>18749442

4/4

But Anzac Day isn’t just about commemorating the Gallipoli landing – it is also about honouring Australia’s servicemen and women who have served and continue to do so in war and peacekeeping.

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the declaration which ended Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War, where 521 Australians were killed and more than 3000 were wounded.

In Australia, the national Anzac Day Dawn Service and RSL Veterans’ March will recognise the 30th Anniversary of Australia’s peacekeeping operations in Somalia at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra.

“We acknowledge the 1200 Australian Defence personnel who are currently deployed on operations and we remember all of those who’ve served wearing our nation’s uniform and those who have lost their lives in conflict,” Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles said.

This year also marks the 105th anniversary of the Battles of Villers-Bretonneux, where Australian and British troops defended and then took back the town from the advancing German forces.

“It is here on the Western Front that Australia suffered its greatest losses in the First World War,” Assistant Minister Veterans’ Affairs, Matt Thistlethwaite, who will be in France, said.

He also urged veterans and their families to be aware of the issues and emotions such a day can stir up.

“Anzac Day can be a day of mixed emotions for our veterans; while it is a day to honour their service and catch up with mates, it can be a difficult day for many,” he said.

https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/dawn-services-are-getting-under-way-to-commemorate-anzac-day/news-story/c2381eede438e40d8de188bcf28c19fb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749463

File: 78034929b3f9b4f⋯.jpg (2.33 MB,2724x1816,3:2,Lloyd_Knight_90_flew_45_mi….jpg)

File: 8f98d967181b486⋯.jpg (2.56 MB,2724x1816,3:2,Mervyn_Seeney_85_marched_f….jpg)

File: b02be1acb6da078⋯.jpg (3.41 MB,2724x1816,3:2,Raymond_Darby_Munro_99_lef….jpg)

File: b007f8ed2d3eb92⋯.jpg (685.39 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Thousands_attended_the_daw….jpg)

File: 6535a79ddae498c⋯.jpg (684.8 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Thousands_attended_the_daw….jpg)

>>18749439

‘I was 20 going on 16’: Korean War veterans lead Anzac Day march in sombre reflection

Carolyn Webb and Lachlan Abbott - April 25, 2023

1/2

For years, Lloyd Knight had nightmares about his time serving as a fighter pilot in the Korean War.

“I was 20 going on 16, so it was pretty traumatic, thinking that you’re killing people,” said Knight, who flew 45 missions in Korea in 1953.

He was once shot in the face by North Korean ground forces and narrowly pulled his Gloster Meteor plane up from crashing into a hill.

“There was no counselling in those days,” he said.

On Tuesday, the 90-year-old was among the Korean War veterans leading Melbourne’s 2023 Anzac Day march to mark the 70th anniversary of the war’s armistice. Thousands watched veterans, relatives and community groups march down St Kilda Road from Princes Bridge to the Shrine of Remembrance.

Knight, who also served in the Vietnam War and flew helicopters in 1969, said he was thinking on Tuesday of the fellow pilots from his squadron who died in the Korean War and of “the people in North Korea we attacked”.

“I’m wondering if we’ll ever stop having wars,” he said. “People have got to learn to talk to each other and solve their differences peacefully.”

Among those marching behind a banner marking the centenary of Legacy, the welfare organisation for veterans’ families, was Mervyn Seeney, 85, who said the charity was a wonderful support for he and his mother after the death of his World War I veteran father, Don Seeney, in 1946.

Seeney, who was eight at the time, said Legacy paid his school fees, found him a place to stay when his mother was in hospital with tuberculosis and helped find him a carpentry apprenticeship. He has been a Legacy volunteer for over 60 years.

Raymond “Darby” Munro, 99, and his brother-in-law, Ron Kimpton, 98, were pushed in wheelchairs by relatives in front of the banner of the HMAS Shropshire, the navy ship on which both served as gunners in World War II.

Nine-year-old Tyrone Rubenstar Burke, of Mount Martha, marched holding the medals and a photo of his late grandfather, Barrymore Burke, who served in the merchant navy in World War II as a teenager.

Tyrone’s father, Michael Burke, 64, remembered marching on Anzac Day beside his own father from the age of five. They were also marching for Tyrone’s great-grandfather, Richard Burke, who served in World War I.

Geoff Parkes, 72, was one of a 1965 to 1972 cohort of national servicemen or “nashos” – people conscripted into compulsory military training – who marched under their own banner for the first time.

“We’re telling our kids and our grandkids that we’re proud of what we did,” he said.

Parkes, who served in 1971 and 1972 in Australia and New Guinea and who is president of lobby group Nasho Fair Go, said some nashos had not received service medals from the government in time for the march. Parkes also called for medical care or some benefits for the 1965-72 group.

Earlier in the day, thousands stood still at the Shrine of Remembrance at dawn.

Organisers estimated 40,000 people attended the service in the city – about 10,000 fewer than last year, when Victorians emerged from pandemic restrictions and finally returned to the first uncapped service in three years.

“Every Anzac Day is both historic and tragic,” Victorian Lieutenant-Governor James Angus said in his address this year. “Historic because each year marks the anniversary of another war – another battle. Tragic, because of the terrible price paid by young Australians … to create that history – our history.

“In other words, their sacrifice is our inheritance.”

This year marks 70 years since the armistice of the Korean War, in which Australia lost 339 soldiers.

“When our soldiers came home from Korea in 1953, they returned to a country that was still weary of war. And they didn’t get the welcome or recognition that we owed them,” master of ceremonies Justin Smith said.

“It’s not the first time we’ve made that mistake. But for us now, the ones who carry our history forward, the Korean War will only be the forgotten war if we let it.

“Because for the more than 17,000 men and women who served there, it will not be forgotten.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749465

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18749463

2/2

The Last Post echoed once more. The Ode was read again. And thousands stood in quiet reflection as the eternal flame glowed.

Premier Daniel Andrews and federal cabinet minister Bill Shorten, who represented Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, were among the official delegation at the ceremony. RSL Victoria president Robert Webster and Lord Mayor Sally Capp also sat silently, 108 years since the Gallipoli landings created the Anzac legend.

“The dawn service is always a moving event, and this year truly felt like Victoria recaptured the magic of the service at its fullest and most emotive,” Webster said.

Caitlin Fankhauser, the Shrine’s young ambassador, read In Flanders Fields to an audience cloaked in darkness. Just two years ago, crowds were capped at 1400 and a steel fence was erected to enforce COVID-19 restrictions.

Wreaths and poppies were laid on the Stone of Remembrance as the sun rose to the east on Tuesday. Melburnians could now see the mass of their fellow citizens stretched back towards St Kilda Road. Atop the Shrine, a lone bagpiper played with the city skyline on the horizon as the ceremony concluded.

Kelly Edgar and mother Carol, from Preston, were among the first in the line to lay a poppy at the Stone of Remembrance after the service. The Edgars had family members who served in both world wars, and attend the dawn service every year.

“I think about all the things that they went through and just how hard it must have been and not being super supported when they came back,” she said.

“Obviously, they didn’t know what PTSD was back then. No one spoke about the war. It must’ve been incredibly difficult.”

Thousands also gathered in Gallipoli, Turkey, where the Last Post echoed across the cove where the Anzacs faced a bloody slaughter in World War I with 2000 killed or wounded on the first day of the landing in 1915.

Representing Australia, Veterans Minister Matt Keogh said Gallipoli had become a central part of the country’s story.

“Today, we gather to remember the sacrifices of so many ordinary Australians, caught up in extraordinary events throughout our history, the first of which, occurred on these shores,” he said.

“Before the sun rose on that fateful day, the Anzac legend was set in train. The legend that continues to shape our national values. Values of courage, sacrifice, compassion and mateship.”

In Papua New Guinea, a service at the Bomana War Cemetery marked the more than 3300 Australians buried there.

In Ukraine, soldiers held the Australian flag in front of donated Bushmaster vehicles. Kyiv’s envoy to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, paid tributes to fallen fighters, including the seven Australians who died in the protection of his war-torn nation.

John Buchanan and his family made the trek from Rowville on Tuesday morning and had set up camp chairs to bask in the morning sun once the service was done.

“It was quite emotional to be here for that, to pay respects and remember them,” Buchanan said.

The family had several relatives who served in the world wars, including a surviving uncle who was a gunner on a bomber plane during World War II. When he went to the Australian War Memorial, he was overwhelmed when he saw an exhibit of his old bomber.

“When the motors started, and he heard the sound, he broke down. He was brought back to the pretty horrific memories of serving in that,” Buchanan said. “So, I think about what he went through so that we can have what we have.”

David Prior, 63, from Box Hill, was one of the last to leave the Shrine’s steps before the Anzac march got under way. He was heartened to see many young Victorians at the dawn service.

“I think about people that are gone and how lucky we are to be here,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/it-will-not-be-forgotten-thousands-return-to-the-shrine-for-anzac-day-dawn-service-20230424-p5d2z0.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ1rOArOeLA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749478

File: 23fa569a91a4cc8⋯.jpg (943.13 KB,1536x2048,3:4,A_statue_of_Lachlan_Macqua….jpg)

File: a6eb9e7c0353f78⋯.jpg (135.5 KB,1003x1200,1003:1200,Former_NSW_governor_Lachla….jpg)

File: 827d83c9f02abba⋯.jpg (44.81 KB,375x500,3:4,Governor_Lachlan_Macquarie.jpg)

>>18749439

‘Absolutely disgusted’: Sydney statue defaced in Anzac Day protest

Sarah Keoghan - April 25, 2023

A community in Sydney’s north-west is angry after a statue was defaced with red paint ahead of a local Anzac Day dawn service.

The Lachlan Macquarie statue in Windsor’s McQuade Park was doused in red paint and handprints alongside the phrases “here stands a mass murderer who ordered the genocide” and “no pride in genocide”.

Mayor Sarah McMahon said she was alerted to the incident after the dawn service and said upon inspection, the paint was still “significantly wet”. “To me, it had been done quite recently,” she said. “I am really saddened there are members of our community out there that think this is the appropriate way to get their message across.”

McMahon arranged for council staff to clean the statue and police were also called to the scene.

“We are a military community here in the Hawkesbury and to have this done on a day of such national and local significance to me is appalling,” she said. “I expect the police will do their job thoroughly.”

Police said initial inquiries indicated the vandalism occurred between the hours of 6am and 7am.

An investigation has been launched and anyone with CCTV, dashcam footage or information is urged to contact police.

Local resident Tim Kelly took to Facebook to share an image of the defaced statue, receiving hundreds of horrified comments in response. “The day was about our servicemen, not about any other agenda,” he said. “Everyone is absolutely disgusted.”

Member for Hawkesbury Robyn Preston labelled the protest “unAustralian”.

“This vandalism is a cowardly and gutless act on a day when we are united in honouring the country’s heroes who fought and died for our freedom,” she said. “It is divisive and disrespectful.”

The statue has been the target of protests before. In 2017, the statue was graffitied with the words “murderer” as part of an Australia Day protest.

Monument Australia, an organisation that records monuments throughout Australia, states on its website the statue was commissioned during the bicentenary celebrations in 1994 of European settlement in the Hawkesbury.

“There is controversy around Macquarie’s treatment of Indigenous people,” the website states.

“In April 1816, Macquarie ordered soldiers under his command to kill or capture any Aboriginal people they encountered during a military operation aimed at creating a sense of terror. At least 14 men, women and children were brutally killed, some shot, others driven over a cliff.”

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/absolutely-disgusted-sydney-statue-defaced-in-anzac-day-protest-20230425-p5d32t.html

https://monumentaustralia.org.au/display/23796-governor-lachlan-macquarie

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749483

File: 32762264382a15d⋯.jpg (121.19 KB,1280x720,16:9,Philippine_President_Ferdi….jpg)

>>18744386

Defence Strategic Review: Neighbours tipped to support new posture

AMANDA HODGE - APRIL 24, 2023

As Australia prepares to broaden out its defence posture from a focus on protecting our own borders to one that contributes to regional security and a balance of power, a key question to ask is; Will our neighbours welcome this development?

The review, which explicitly names China’s claims over the South China Sea as the biggest threat to Australia and its neighbourhood, will inevitably touch some nerves in a region already highly attuned to any activity that could further inflame tensions.

That sensitivity was demonstrated by the reaction of some of our closest Southeast Asian partners to Australia’s pursuit of nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS security pact.

Still, the regional answer will likely be a qualified yes, given Monday’s defence review essentially advocates for more of the same in Southeast Asia: greater regional diplomatic and defence engagement and collaboration at bilateral, trilateral and multi­lateral levels.

The Philippines will be the one ASEAN nation to outright welcome Australia’s recognition that its security is tied to that of the region, and that a defence posture concerned with threats only to our own borders is of little use in today’s strategic environment.

Manila has pivoted back to traditional defence treaty allies the US and Australia under President Ferdinand Marcos jnr and has invited more active defence engagement with Canberra – a key area to watch in coming years.

Australia and The Philippines could build new ties, perhaps involving one or more of the Quad partners. They are already discussing joint maritime patrols of the South China Sea, where Chinese naval, coastguard and fishing fleets routinely harass Filipino vessels.

Such an idea would be unthinkable in Jakarta’s halls of power. Indonesia, ASEAN’s de facto leader and a committed non-aligned power, sees its best defence in downplaying its own territorial tensions with China and instead using the well-established back channels to Beijing to defuse issues as they arise.

Australia’s determination to harden its northern defences, including expanding long-range strike capabilities, is unlikely to faze Indonesia’s defence establishment, although could raise hackles inside Jakarta’s foreign ministry.

Still, both Indonesia and Malaysia – the most vocal critics of the AUKUS pact – will see the utility of a stronger Australia able to project power in the defence of the region, even if they worry it could provoke a more belligerent Beijing to be less amenable to quiet diplomacy.

Indonesia security expert Yohanes Sulaiman says Jakarta will recognise that Australia’s new defence strategy – an extension of the 2020 defence review – is focused on China, but will read it with an eye to how Beijing’s response will affect them.

“They just don’t want tensions to rise and they don’t want to be forced to take sides,” he said.

“By Australia and the US building up their power, the feeling in Jakarta is that China will become more belligerent (and less open to back channel negotiations).”

The quiet cheerleaders for Australia’s new approach will be Singapore, Vietnam and perhaps even Cambodia, a country that has maintained a strong relationship with Australia even as it has grown closer to China.

Euan Graham, a Senior Fellow for Indo-Pacific Defence and Strategy at Singapore’s International Institute for Strategic Studies, says the unclassified review, at least, is as interesting for its omissions on Southeast Asia-specific plans as it is for what it spells out.

Canberra has already stepped up regional engagement under Foreign Minister Penny Wong and increasingly is participating in expanded military exercises across the Indo-Pacific.

But the defence review offers few clues as to where Australia will invest more of its resources in regional defence engagement.

It talks of the need to do more in the region with its Quad partners, Japan, India and the US, yet makes only generic references to greater engagement and collaboration with Southeast Asia – wisely opting not to single out any neighbouring country.

Maritime security analyst Collin Koh said Australia had learned its lessons over many decades of regional engagement, and was showing a more sophisticated approach to the region than the US.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/defence-review-neighbours-tipped-to-support-new-posture/news-story/d76439b5800b0f5181c358b7c4fb1ecf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749496

File: 83fa9aae13b6ba4⋯.jpg (59.56 KB,1000x648,125:81,Retired_US_Vice_Admiral_Wi….jpg)

>>18744386

Retired US admiral who has previously advised Australia on shipbuilding to lead fresh review of navy's warship fleet

Andrew Greene - 25 April 2023

1/2

A former US admiral, who has previously chaired Australia's expert shipbuilding advisory panel, has been handed a new job leading another review of the navy's warship fleet to ensure it "complements" the new AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines.

Retired US Vice Admiral William H Hilarides will conduct the fresh analysis with Australia's former finance secretary Rosemary Huxtable, and former Australian fleet commander, retired Vice-Admiral Stuart Mayer.

The latest study is a recommendation from the Defence Strategic Review (DSR), with the Albanese government insisting the "independent" work will be "short and sharp" and its findings delivered before the end of the year.

Admiral Hilarides, who left the US Navy in 2016, has already received hundreds of thousands of dollars in consulting contracts from the Australian Defence Department through a private American advisory company.

The Albanese government has now agreed to a key DSR recommendation that "an independent analysis of Navy's surface combatant fleet capability should be conducted in Q3 2023".

According to the DSR the study of the navy's current and planned future warship fleet aims to "ensure its size, structure and composition complement the capabilities provided by the forthcoming conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines".

"The analysis must assess: The capability requirements to meet our current strategic circumstances as outlined in the review, as well as the cost, schedule, risks and the continuous shipbuilding potential of each option".

Defence Minister Richard Marles argued the government accepted the recommendation because there was "merit in having a short condition check at this moment in time about the future shape of our surface fleet".

"The surface fleet, as it's currently constructed, was determined at a time when Australia was still pursuing a diesel electric powered submarine," Mr Marles said.

"Now that we are going to be operating a nuclear-powered submarine, that is a dramatically different capability, and it obviously has some implication in terms of the overall structure of the Navy, not only as we think about the next decade, but as we think about the next three decades."

"The Defence Strategic Review has observed that navies around the world are moving in the direction, to put it kind of crudely, of having a larger number of smaller vessels," he added.

The Defence Minister insists current work on constructing Australia's Hunter class frigates will continue without any disruption, with steel due to be cut on the first of the large warships in Adelaide next month.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy told the ABC that the former Admiral was the right person to lead the review.

"The navies of our two countries already work very closely together," Mr Conroy said.

"William Hilarides has had a long association with Australia. He's chair of our naval shipbuilding advisory panel, that's already providing advice on our naval acquisitions."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749498

File: a2bc8c4921e1af8⋯.jpg (138.19 KB,1200x663,400:221,A_graphic_of_the_Hunter_Cl….jpg)

>>18749496

2/2

Soldiers assured their roles remain significant

Meanwhile the Chief of Army has warned his soldiers they will need to adapt quickly to emerging technologies, following the release of the Defence Strategic Review which drastically cuts armoured vehicles and mobile artillery.

Under the DSR the number of new locally built infantry fighting vehicles is being slashed from 450 to 129, and a planned second regiment of self-propelled Howitzers is being cancelled altogether.

More than any other service, the army will undergo major changes and be re-equipped to operate missile technology, which is expected to increase in range out to several hundreds of kilometres.

In a message recorded following the DSR release, Lieutenant General Simon Stuart has assured army members they will still be providing a significant but very different role in the future.

"There will be a significantly smaller but no less capable combined arms fighting system," General Stuart said in a video posted online.

"We'll accelerate delivery of our long-range fires and littoral manoeuvre capabilities. Our formations will become more specialised and we'll increase the use of robotics and quantum technology."

"There will also be changes to the scale and scope of our capabilities, the sequence and pace of delivery, how we're organised, how we train and the resources that will be available to us — things will be different and along with the opportunities there will be some challenges."

Japanese and US Defence officials have welcomed the review, with US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin calling it a demonstration of "Australia's commitment to being at the forefront of incorporating new capabilities … as well as to our Unbreakable Alliance, which has never been stronger".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-25/retired-us-admiral-to-review-australias-warship-fleet/102262644

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749505

File: 06cda2a2b5f9633⋯.jpg (299.47 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Anthony_Albanese_Joe_Biden….jpg)

File: 8b34537c44e1d46⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,US_Senator_Jack_Reed_says_….jpg)

File: 8e4d27c706ac24d⋯.jpg (275.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_L_R_Committee_chairman_Se….jpg)

>>18670474

US senator warns AUKUS faces ‘significant’ workforce hurdles

Farrah Tomazin - April 25, 2023

Washington: The US politician who warned that AUKUS could push America’s shipbuilding yards to breaking point has renewed concerns about the pact, saying that a shortage of skilled workers was still a “significant impediment” to producing enough submarines on time.

Last December, in a dramatic intervention three months before the pathway for AUKUS was unveiled in March, Democrat senator Jack Reed wrote to President Joe Biden raising concerns that the military deal could imperil America’s submarine fleet, as the industry was already struggling to meet its target to build two attack submarines a year.

Reed’s letter, co-authored with Republican Senate colleague James Inhofe, was the first time members of Congress had expressed serious misgivings about the agreement, and explicitly warned against any plan to sell or transfer Virginia-class submarines to Australia before the US Navy met its current requirements.

Asked on Monday (Tuesday morning AEST) if his concerns had been alleviated, Reed, who chairs the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee, said that while US shipyards had made some progress in recruiting workers and boosting production lines, it would be “a long, long process” to ensure the industry could keep pace with demand.

“One of the stumbling blocks – and this is not exclusive for any type of military program – is just the shortage of skilled workers. That has been a significant impediment to staying on schedule and staying on time,” he said.

“I’m beginning to hear that there is more progress in the yards in terms of attracting workers and the efficiency of production, but we can’t be content or satisfied until we get back to two attack submarines a year and see the successful completion on time and on budget of Columbia (the upcoming class of nuclear submarines designed to replace the US Navy’s ageing Ohio-class).”

America’s ability to build submarines as efficiently as possible has flow-on effects for AUKUS, which is a trilateral agreement between Australia, the UK and the US to provide Australia with nuclear-powered submarines in a bid to counter China’s economic and military advances in the Indo-Pacific.

Under the strategy, Australia will buy at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US while building up the capacity to develop its own locally made nuclear-powered subs, some time in the 2040s.

However, questions remain about workforce capacity and the lengthy time frame involved; the $368 billion cost to taxpayers; and the maze of US export control laws that must be reformed for America to share nuclear technology secrets with Australia.

Reed said AUKUS nonetheless sent a strong signal to China about the “declared co-operation” between the US, Australia and the UK. And he agreed that export controls and regulations should be expedited as soon as possible, to ensure the deal wasn’t bogged down by red tape.

“We’re starting out on a very important voyage,” he said, speaking at a forum for the Centre for a New American Security.

The senator’s comments come as a federal government review released this week identified China as the biggest threat to Australia’s national security and warned that the Australian Defence Force is not equipped for a modern age of warfare.

“China’s military build-up is now the largest and most ambitious of any country since the end of the Second World War,” the review said.

“This build-up is occurring without transparency or reassurance to the Indo-Pacific region of China’s strategic intent.

“China’s assertion of sovereignty over the South China Sea threatens the global rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific in a way that adversely impacts Australia’s national interests.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/us-senator-warns-aukus-faces-significant-workforce-hurdles-20230425-p5d30f.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749519

File: 3cc5aa589b5a7c0⋯.jpg (2.28 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,More_US_Marines_could_soon….jpg)

File: 1ddb17ecc56f25a⋯.jpg (1.07 MB,2736x1824,3:2,Darwin_and_the_wider_Top_E….jpg)

File: dcdc6833cc56071⋯.jpg (100.84 KB,1024x682,512:341,Experts_say_northern_Austr….jpg)

File: ff270f497f40440⋯.jpg (1.62 MB,5000x3332,1250:833,Up_to_several_thousand_US_….jpg)

>>18676841

>>18744386

NT prepares for increase in military spending, US Marines after Defence Strategic Review

Matt Garrick - 25 April 2023

The Northern Territory is poised to play a key role in Australia's future missile defences, according to a Top End MP, as the region prepares for an influx of soldiers and defence force spending.

A major defence force review released on Monday by the Albanese government, touted the need for immediate upgrades and developments to bases across northern Australia.

The Defence Strategic Review pinpointed a "network of bases, ports and barracks stretching in Australian territory from Cocos (Keeling) Islands in the north-west, through RAAF bases Learmonth, Curtin, Darwin, Tindal, Scherger and Townsville" for urgent and comprehensive upgrades.

NT Chief Minister Natasha Fyles welcomed any increase in troops and the economic boost they would bring.

"What [the review] will deliver for the Northern Territory is an overall increase in military personnel and defence presence into the Northern Territory," Ms Fyles said.

"Northern Australia was on the frontline in World War II, and I hope we never go there [again], but it will again be on the frontline into the future."

The strategic review flagged that Australia was entering the "missile age" and that its army would be re-equipped to operate missile technology to be able to better deal with any possible foreign encroachment.

North could play a role in missile future

Federal government MP Luke Gosling said the country's north would be prepared to play its part.

"There's no doubt that the Northern Territory and the Top End will be part of the [nation's] missile story," he said.

"Why? Because we're defending Australia, and obviously, you can get more range into the northern approaches to Australia from the Top End."

Dr John Coyne, a strategic policy expert on northern Australia, said if and when the review recommendations were taken onboard, the Top End would receive a boost to its economy and firepower.

"What I can say is the capabilities that will be deployed in northern Australia will certainly be more potent and more lethal than they have been in the past," Dr Coyne said.

"What we're going to see is a range of new capabilities.

"We'll likely see the deployment of capabilities like HIMARS [High Mobility Artillery Rocket System], air defence batteries, those sort of capabilities rotated in and out of the Northern Territory, as part of the [US] Marine rotation in Darwin."

Mr Gosling said the upcoming federal budget would reflect the urgency of the report's recommendations to begin upgrading defence bases in northern Australia as soon as possible.

Increase to US Marine rotation recommended

The presence of the US Marines in Australia's Top End is also poised to grow in the years ahead, with the review recommending an increase to the annual rotation.

The report said an increase would help bolster the alliance between the two nations.

It recommended a shift towards "increased United States rotational force posture in Australia, including submarines".

It also called for greater "engagement with the US on deterrence, including through joint exercises and patrols; and strengthening Australia's sovereign military and industrial capabilities".

Dr Coyne said this could play out through the arrival in the north of more US ships and fighter jets annually.

"There's a strong possibility that we'll see more often, more frequent US Navy ship visits," he said.

"Certainly we're most likely to see a greater rotational force of US air force craft through northern Australia."

The US Marines have been rotating through the Northern Territory on an annual basis since 2011, with the move first touted during a trip to Darwin by then-US president Barack Obama.

The rotation hit a peak of 2,500 troops on the ground in 2019.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-25/defence-strategic-review-northern-australia-more-troops-spending/102260348

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749527

File: 66e965b5a3aa7bb⋯.jpg (68.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,Encep_Nurjaman_also_known_….jpg)

>>18734262

Bali bomb mastermind Hambali appears at Guantanamo hearing

ADAM CREIGHTON - APRIL 25, 2023

The terrorist mastermind behind the 2002 nightclub Bali bombings, which killed 202 people including 88 Australians, has appeared at a preliminary hearing in Guantanamo Bay where prosecutors proposed a formal trial date of early 2025, more than 21 years after his arrest in Thailand.

Encep Nurjaman, 59, an Indonesian who is known as Hambali, sat calmly in a military courtroom in Guantanamo Bay on Monday (Tuesday AEST) during proceedings that became bogged down in legal debate about translator quality and the US government’s sluggish provision of documents.

“These gentlemen have been incarcerated for 20 years, judge, and these men are entitled to a trial,” said Jim Hodes, his defence counsel.

Mr Nurjaman appeared alongside two Malaysians, Mohammed Nazir Bin Lep and Mohammed Farik Bin Amin, allegedly responsible for the 2003 Marriott hotel bombing in Jakarta that killed at least 11 people and wounded at least 80. All three were members of Jemaah Islamiyah, an Islamic extremist group linked to al-Qaida.

“Can I be compelled to be present?” Mr Nurjaman asked through his translator, as the judge made clear the court was willing to accommodate Muslim prayer times.

Four unidentified family members of those killed sat at the back of the military courtroom in the notorious US naval base in Cuba, where dozens of alleged terrorists, down from a peak above 700, remain detained by the US without recourse to the usual US constitutional protections.

Meanwhile half a dozen foreign journalists sat before a large screen in a classroom in Fort Meade, a vast US military community in Maryland, home to around 60,000 defence personnel and their families, and the only place the proceedings could be viewed outside the Pentagon and Guantanamo itself.

“My client has been lied to and deceived and subject to misrepresentation by the US government for almost 20 years,” said defence counsel for Mr Bin Lep, reflecting frustration with multiple delays in the trial of the three men, who were formally arraigned 18 months ago and earlier tortured in CIA facilities, before their transfer to Guantanamo in 2006.

Fresh questions of translator quality emerged early in the proceedings after defence lawyers claimed their clients, who speak Malaysian, were being addressed in Indonesian and broken English.

“We had one hearing, and I’ll put it out there, it was a disaster, in terms of how the interpretation worked, and we’re already having these problems again,” fumed defence counsel Brian Bouffard, representing Mr Bin Amin.

One of the US government translators assigned to the men had said in 2020 “the government [was] wasting money on these terrorists; they should have been killed a long time ago”.

Prosecutors, who are seeking life imprisonment for the three, said it was “not easy to find linguists who have skills and can maintain the necessary clearances”.

“I think objectively when you look at it, it looks bad,” Judge Hayes Larsen conceded, ultimately refusing to dismiss the translators by virtue of their formal qualifications and their oaths of impartiality.

“[Prosecutors] keep asking for extension time after time; if this were a normal case, … I have no doubt you would have set a very tight deadline to make sure all discovery was provided … It’s like the great Britney Spears said ‘oops, I did it again,” said Mr Hodes.

The chief prosecutor said they had been working “day in, day out” and had “produced 90 per cent of all materials according to deadlines”

“The 10 per cent that remain to be produced includes very sensitive classified materials … it’s a complicated and iterative process,” he added, promising to provide the documents, which include material related to their detention by the CIA, to the court by the end of January 2024.

Defence lawyers said the US government had enough money for “5-star black sites” – a reference to CIA torture sites around the world that were used during the War on Terror – and should bring the case forward to this year.

The preliminary hearings are expected to last for the rest of the week.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/bali-bomb-mastermind-hambali-appears-at-guantanamo-hearing/news-story/52896bdf6e3b9339201ad5df15acd117

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749555

File: d055b3fb089e5c9⋯.jpg (1.17 MB,3851x2570,3851:2570,Child_sexual_abuse_survivo….jpg)

File: 098ba6a21867e8a⋯.jpg (3.13 MB,4032x2268,16:9,The_panel_recommended_Dr_H….jpg)

File: 2dcc93440fbfd0b⋯.jpg (846.6 KB,2835x1946,405:278,Dr_Hollingworth_has_been_f….jpg)

>>18744576

Abuse survivors slam Anglican Church ruling of ex governor-general Peter Hollingworth amid calls for re-investigation

Phoebe Hosier - 25 April 2023

1/2

Survivors of church abuse have slammed the finding of an Anglican Church investigation into former governor-general Peter Hollingworth and called for him to be re-examined by an independent body.

Dr Hollingworth resigned as governor-general in 2003, following a series of revelations that he allowed paedophile priests to keep working while he was the Archbishop of Brisbane in the 1990s.

On Monday, an inquiry by the Professional Standards Board of the Anglican Church ruled Dr Hollingworth should not be stripped or defrocked of his holy orders, despite finding he committed misconduct by allowing two priests to remain in the church who he knew had sexually abused children.

The inquiry found Dr Hollingworth was "fit for ministry", as long as he offered apologies to victim survivors of child sexual abuse who suffered under his leadership when he was Archbishop.

Dr Hollingworth, who still holds the status and authority of a bishop, is 88 and his most recent work with the church has been as a priest at St George's Anglican Church in Malvern.

The board recommended his ministry be confined to duties in this role including facilitating weddings, funerals, baptisms and other services when invited.

The ruling has sparked outrage from victim survivors of Anglican child sexual abuse and beyond.

Many, including abuse survivor Beth Heinrich, have been campaigning for Dr Hollingworth to be defrocked for years.

Ms Heinrich has spent decades fighting for justice and redress for the abuse she suffered at the hands of Anglican priest Donald Shearman when she was 15 years old.

Mr Shearman is one of two clerics who Dr Hollingworth allowed to remain in the ministry despite knowing they had sexually assaulted children.

Ms Heinrich told the ABC the decision was disappointing but not surprising.

"I wasn't surprised at all, I was half expecting it.

"I was hoping to set an example for people who hadn't come forward, hoping to make them feel braver. But what's the sense in coming forward if you get decisions like that?

"If Peter Hollingworth thinks an apology to me will rectify anything well his apology would be too late. The time to help me was when I went to him in '95."

Ms Heinrich said abuse survivors were "bitterly disappointed" with the finding.

Investigating 10 allegations made against Dr Hollingworth, the board ruled there was "no acceptable risk of harm to any person" if Dr Hollingworth continues to hold his position as bishop.

In a statement, Dr Hollingworth said he accepted the board's recommendations and has reflected on his failings.

"I made mistakes and I cannot undo them. But I committed no crimes," he said.

"There is no evidence that there was any abuse because of any decisions I made, or did not make.

"I had devoted my life to social justice, pastoral care and healing but I had little experience in dealing with the child abuse issues. Like other church leaders, I was unduly influenced by the advice of lawyers and insurance companies."

Ms Heinrich said she believed the decision will stop people from coming forward "because they will think it's just not worth the effort".

"I've been five years waiting for this so-called committee board to make a decision and it's just been disgraceful."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749557

File: 3084b7043ad8b81⋯.jpg (66.74 KB,960x540,16:9,Beth_Heinrich_s_lawyer_Jud….jpg)

File: 615c5792c8c5399⋯.jpg (659.08 KB,3000x1993,3000:1993,Cathy_Kezelman_has_called_….jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>18749555

2/2

'Livid' survivors call for re-investigation

Ms Heinrich's outrage at what she believes to be a lack of independence has been echoed by other victim-survivors of the Anglican community.

Beyond Abuse CEO Steve Fisher said survivors and advocates "totally reject" the findings and have called for Hollingworth to be re-investigated within a 12-month period with an independent board.

An abuse survivor himself, Mr Fisher said the ruling was yet another "huge blow".

"It's just re-traumatising survivors who have the guts to come forward. But every time they finally think they'll get a bit of justice it is diminished by the church and their so-called investigative body," he said.

"We are calling on them to do it again and do it right. Get someone independent in.

"These allegations against Mr Hollingworth are not trivial. We are livid about it.

"We are calling on the church to re-do the whole process, examine all the evidence in full."

Mr Heinrich's lawyer Judy Courtin said she was "gobsmacked" by the ruling — an outcome she described as a "complete white wash".

"It's really a form of perhaps concealment and cover up to protect someone's reputation. It's a disgrace. It not only does not deliver justice and accountability to our client, it has caused further trauma and abuse.

"To find that it was nothing but a wrap over the knuckles was surprising to a degree but also very, very harmful and disgraceful," Dr Courtin said.

"This decision provides nothing but disincentive to survivors. Why would they bother to bear their souls… when this is the outcome?

"What message is this giving to senior Anglican clergy? It's saying you don't have to de-frock a fellow priest if you find out they've been sexually abusing someone.

"It's upholding concealment and criminal activities in the church."

'A troubling retrograde step'

Five years on from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Dr Courtin said this decision signalled a "troubling" move backwards.

"This decision is a retrograde step. It just does not fit the post-royal commission world. It's going back to church behaviour of the past that we had a five-year royal commission trying to correct."

The findings came amid criticism of secrecy and delays levelled at Kooyoora, the body handling the complaints process.

The four members of the panel were lawyer Robin Brett KC, former Family Court of Australia judge Paul Cronin, Reverend Keiron Jones and Kooyoora board member Marie Davis.

In a statement, Australia's national centre of excellence for complex trauma, the Blue Knot Foundation, said Monday's findings demonstrated the "outrage of institutions investigating themselves".

President Cathy Kezelman AM described the investigation as "far from comprehensive" and "anything but independent".

"This is an absolute travesty, and further negation of the cumulative harm over which Peter Hollingworth has presided," Dr Kezelman said.

"After a five-year process replete with delays and obfuscation, the only decent response is for Peter Hollingworth to voluntary resign his Holy Orders, and a full independent investigation to be conducted without delay."

Ms Heinrich told victim survivors "to keep fighting for the justice they know they deserve".

She said she planned to take further action against the findings in future and would be involved in moves to amend the Governor-General Act.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-25/peter-hollingwoth-anglican-panel-abuse-survivor-beth-heinrich/102262318

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18749567

File: 777e3ab5096fd37⋯.jpg (155.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_governor_general_Pe….jpg)

>>18744576

Peter Hollingworth: ‘Ex-governor-general not fit to function as priest’, say lawyers

JOHN FERGUSON - APRIL 25, 2023

Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth should have been stripped of his permission to officiate as an Anglican minister due to serious misconduct and deficiency of character, according to lawyers for the internal investigation into his wrongdoing.

Counsel for the church-created Professional Standards Committee submitted that Dr Hollingworth’s failings were so deep that he should not be able to function as a priest and that if his mission were ratified it would erode trust in the vocation.

But the Anglican-inspired tribunal that judged Dr Hollingworth ultimately decided that, despite finding multiple counts of misconduct, the former Archbishop of Brisbane had been ignorant of the needs of child sex abuse victims rather than wilfully negligent.

The Anglican Diocese of Melbourne set up a complex and slow moving response to the child sex abuse royal commission, which led to a five-year complaints process and examination of whether Dr Hollingworth should have been defrocked for a series of failings while running the church in Brisbane in the late 1980s and 1990s.

The report into three complaints against Dr Hollingworth found he had failed to adequately care for and support two abuse victims, permitted an offender to remain in ministry despite knowing he was a risk to children and green-flagged another offender to remain in ministry despite knowing he had sexually assaulted a child.

Under the investigatory process, the diocese’s professional standards committee presented a case to the Professional Standards Board, which was overseen by Robin Brett KC.

Counsel for the PSC Diana Price submitted that Dr Hollingworth, 88, had shown “such deficiencies of character that he was not an appropriate person to be held out to not only the church community but the community in general”.

The report, handed to affected parties this week, quotes and paraphrases some of the submission.

“She (Ms Price) pointed to the fact that if he were to retain permission to perform the duties he currently performs, he would not only be standing before the world as fit to minister in his local parish and other local or private places but at St Paul’s Cathedral, the centrepiece of the diocese, where she submitted, he was presented as a figurehead or role model,’’ the ruling says.

“If that were to continue to happen following this hearing, she submitted, trust in the church (and) its priests as guides and moral leaders would be eroded.

“She submitted that it was important for it to be clearly understood by all that there were consequences for breaches of expected standards of behaviour.”

The tribunal was required to decide whether Dr Hollingworth was a fit person to function as a minister under church legislation. It had the power to defrock the former governor-general.

Counsel for the PSC said that Dr Hollingworth had failed substantially over the now dead priests Donald Shearman and John Elliot, where he had allowed both to remain in the church despite knowing they were abuse offenders.

But the tribunal found that Dr Hollingworth had not acted out of malice but ignorance of the impact of sex offending on children.

“We consider that the respondent’s grave mistakes were ultimately due to his failure to understand the lifelong effects that sexual abuse can have on a child and did have on the victims of Elliot and Shearman,” the ruling says.

“This led to his fundamental error in treating the interests of the perpetrators as at least equal to those of the victims and the consequential decisions to permit them to remain in ministry.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/peter-hollingworth-exgovernorgeneral-not-fit-to-function-as-priest-say-lawyers/news-story/231be8bec5167e494a07326f96d0a52f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18754977

File: b8944564e8e64b0⋯.mp4 (15.61 MB,408x720,17:30,School_bus_stolen_by_own_s….mp4)

File: 0a51d55285ec024⋯.jpg (54.92 KB,1024x767,1024:767,Screengrabs_from_a_series_….jpg)

File: 2e3915636ba8f3f⋯.jpg (98.69 KB,768x768,1:1,In_the_minibus_incident_la….jpg)

File: 4036c10eadbfbf7⋯.jpg (55.88 KB,768x768,1:1,Gavin_Morris_said_he_took_….jpg)

>>18687374

>>18698609

‘Girls won’t go home … they’re worried about their uncles’

A 12-year-old driving a stolen bus, children in ankle bracelets: an Alice Springs principal reveals the horrifying crisis engulfing Indigenous children

LIAM MENDES - April 26, 2023

1/2

An Alice Springs school principal has revealed the horrifying extent of the crisis engulfing Indigenous children in central Australia, ­detailing incidents where children are sometimes returned to school in handcuffs or wearing ankle bracelets and one in which a 12-year-old and his mates led teachers on a wild pursuit through the town in a stolen minibus.

In a dramatic video of the ­minibus chase obtained by The Australian a teacher can be heard screaming: “You little shits … pull over!” as she leans from the window of a pursuing car.

As Labor and Coalition leaders trade blows over allegations of ­neglect and child sexual abuse in the Northern Territory, Yipirinya School principal Gavin Morris has come forward with a desperate plea to help students like his who are “in absolute crisis”.

He said staff routinely had to contact magistrates to have bail conditions varied for children as young as 12 so they could participate in after-school ­programs, but added that his students saw the school as “a place of ­culture” and “a place where they want to be”.

In one incident where a teenage girl had been raped, her young brother who had witnessed the crime came to school with serious signs of self-harm after attempting to take his own life. “For the teenage girls who don’t go home because they’re worried about their uncles coming in, these are the girls who are walking around Alice Springs unsupervised because they don’t feel safe to go home,” Mr Morris said.

A political storm erupted last month after Peter Dutton, backed by Indigenous senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, alleged rampant child sexual abuse in the Territory, only to be attacked by NT Police Minister Kate Worden for “absolutely opportunistic political game-playing”.

The Australian has previously revealed how, despite the promise of almost $300m in extra funding in the NT and new restrictions on alcohol sales, children are still on the streets late at night, playing cat and mouse with police.

The shocking catalogue of evidence produced by Mr Morris, who has a PhD in Aboriginal trauma and lectures at Charles Darwin University, is set to focus attention on the NT’s beleaguered education system and efforts to keep Indigenous children attending school.

Most important for Mr Morris is that students see Yipirinya now as a place of cultural safety, a place where they can feel safe, and they can feel like they belong. “I’ve got kids coming to see me and saying home life is that bad that they’d rather be in Owen Springs (juvenile detention) and in incarceration where they feel safer.”

“We need support to make sure that we get all these kids the support that they need,” he says.

In the minibus incident last August, a group of students – the driver aged 12, the oldest just 14 – stole the vehicle at 9pm, smashing through the school gates, and sped through the main street of Alice Springs.

Mr Morris recalled his phone suddenly “buzzing off its head” as teachers reported they were frantically pursuing the students in their cars, begging them to stop before someone was seriously injured or killed.

Video of the chase shows the bus careening down the street as the teacher driving the car behind desperately beeps its horn and flashes its headlights. Tyres screech as they turn a corner, chasing the kids, who live in town camps around Alice Springs.

“You f.cking wait!” one teacher screams. “Pull over!”

The pursuing teachers are scared for the lives of the students and innocent bystanders.

As they head out of town, the car swerves onto the wrong side of the road, throwing up dirt when it veers off the bitumen. The kids drive down to an Indigenous camp on the outskirts of town, where the bus begins to slow.

Ten kids jump out of the van while it’s still moving and scatter into the night, some vaulting ­fences. “They came to school the next day,” Mr Morris said.

None was charged. The bus was written off, with significant damage to the structure and axles. It was not an isolated incident, Mr Morris said.

“We’ve got a growing number of students at Yipirinya who come to school with ankle bracelets, who have got bail conditions attached to the upcoming court case, some of these are very, very young,” says Mr Morris.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18754983

File: c6bf5d924bcc45a⋯.mp4 (13.9 MB,304x540,76:135,NT_Principal_details_horro….mp4)

File: 67cc9d2d2ac93c3⋯.jpg (142.9 KB,1280x720,16:9,Yipirinya_School_principal….jpg)

File: 9cb5f2ce79d783b⋯.jpg (126.56 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18754977

2/2

Earlier this year, he says a caged police truck arrived at the school at 8.30am, with four handcuffed girls who had been “day-breaking” – staying up all night roaming the streets.

“(They) didn’t want to go home, so came to school,” he said. “That’s not something that was seen as an emergency, that’s ­pretty much day-to-day operations. This is what we’re dealing with at Yipirinya, and it doesn’t define us. We’re a very strong cultural school, and the majority of our kids every day come to school, and it’s happy – and they love learning and they love coming to school – but a lot of our families overcome a great deal to get there.

“We’re not talking about historical events here; we’re not dredging up some of the big, bad dark stories from the past; this is the stuff that we’re dealing with regularly.”

Mr Morris said he took the students breaking into the school “personally”, but added that most of it came down to lack of ­supervision, trauma and seeking attention.

He said many children who were arrested and sent to juvenile detention, were assessed, and “100 per cent” of them returned with a diagnosis, many with a fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.

“Issues stem from alcohol and from households that feature alcohol and drug abuse and lack of parenting and lack of parenting support and families in crisis and families carrying the trauma of colonisation and then unresolved trauma and the use of alcohol to cope with that trauma,” he said.

Mr Morris said underlying issues as to why young children were on the street needed to be addressed. “What we’ve proposed and had on the table and have bipartisan support is around an ­accommodation facility built at Yipirinya,” he said.

He believes some of the $300m promised to address ­issues in central Australia by Anthony Albanese should be allocated to the project.

“For those students or families who choose or need that emergency accommodation, that safe, secure accommodation, we want to be able to offer that at Yipirinya,” he said.

“We need more than just bipartisan support, we need the government to come to the table and fund it. You can’t have unsupervised children walking around the streets.”

Mr Morris said some girls were roaming around unsupervised because they didn’t feel like they belonged or were accepted.

“They feel like they’re being left behind from society,” he said.

“Those homes in crisis that have chronic alcohol and substance abuse, chronic domestic violence, chronic sexual assaults, they need support.

“This isn’t all Aboriginal families, but let’s get behind those that need the support.”

Mr Morris said homes with a lack of food, financial security and supervision often led to children presenting on the streets and at schools and in the community as being anti-social.

“But there’s certainly a ­growing number of families in ­crisis that need support, and the support they need is in respect to alcohol and substance abuse, domestic and sexual violence,” he said. “Mothers, in particular, are the ones who seem to be standing up in community, and it’s the mothers who are at crisis point.”

Mr Morris said schools needed to begin dealing with underlying trauma before traditional schooling such as literacy and numeracy. “It’s not punitive, it’s not reactionary … it’s about addressing the underlying trauma that these kids are bringing into the school,” he said.

“Once you’ve addressed that trauma, then you can start talking about literacy and numeracy and employment opportunities and the rest of it.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/handcuffed-children-and-12yearolds-joyriding-in-a-stolen-bus-an-alice-springs-principal-despairs/news-story/9b9fb2c4abdf17b511266176e1b61af0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18754991

File: f132647ca89f5d7⋯.jpg (208.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Albanese_government_sa….jpg)

File: 903d4e1b1086115⋯.jpg (87.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bret_Walker_SC.jpg)

File: 0c2d92bb2fc4719⋯.jpg (144.69 KB,1280x720,16:9,Robert_French_former_Chief….jpg)

>>18676743

Indigenous voice to parliament inquiry submissions are more petition than sound legal analysis

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - APRIL 26, 2023

1/2

Over the next few weeks I plan to bring you some submissions from the joint parliamentary inquiry into the Indigenous voice to parliament proposal. The first point is that not all submissions are equal. Let’s start with the dumbest.

For the crib note version of what has gone wrong with universities, read the submissions from the University of Sydney law school and Adelaide Law School. Each is a one-pager saying they are allies of the voice, describing it as legally sound and signed by a gaggle of academics.

These are petitions, not submissions.

This is groupthink meets sandstone arrogance: legal academics with nothing of substance to say, offering no legal analysis. It’s apparently enough that they say Yes. Seriously, what is the point of these law schools?

Let’s look at what more serious-minded people put to the inquiry.

The Solicitor-General’s opinion contains critical flaws. He describes the proposed voice as an “enhancement” to our democracy. This is a political comment, not a legal one, leading some lawyers to wonder, tongue in cheek, whether this is a job application, not a legal opinion.

The SG is unconvincing, too, when he wrestles with straw men. For example, no one claims the voice has a legal right to veto decisions of parliament or the executive. The real concerns arise in the grey, messy, uncertain areas that the SG does not address.

The most obvious gap in the SG’s advice is that it’s premised on what happens once representations have been made. He doesn’t consider what must happen first – whether the many arms and bodies and bureaucracies that make up the executive in this country will need to notify the voice of relevant matters in advance of deciding them, and give it time and resources to analyse them.

After all, how can this new constitutionally mandated body exercise its constitutional right in practice to make representations unless it knows what to make representations about and has the time and resources to consider them? A brand-new constitutional power to make representations is neutered if the executive can make decisions in private and without notifying the voice about the issues being decided.

Put it this way. Bret Walker SC would likely be in the High Court in a heartbeat on behalf of the voice if parliament tries to use its legislative powers to assert executive government has no duty to notify the voice of relevant matters in advance or give it the time and resources to decide if it wants to make representations, let alone to receive and consider those representations. In other words, Walker would argue for the implications that both he and SG say do not arise.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18754994

File: d4b04cd12216d55⋯.jpg (147.7 KB,768x1024,3:4,David_Jackson.jpg)

File: 411eb446bcf436b⋯.jpg (91.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Professor_George_Williams_….jpg)

>>18754991

2/2

Once the High Court draws necessary constitutional implications from the new chapter to the Constitution, this is where treacle is poured all over our current system of government. David Jackson is the country’s pre-eminent constitutional silk. He has appeared in hundreds of High Court cases, and his constitutional law experience outstrips that of most former justices of the High Court and certainly leaves the Solicitor-General far behind. In contrast to many other lawyers parading in this debate as constitutional law experts, Jackson is the real deal.

Jackson advised the inquiry that the words “subject to this Constitution” that appear in the third sentence – where parliament is given powers in respect of the voice – mean if parliament passes a law to neuter the voice’s ability to make representations, then that law would be invalid. That means the courts, not parliament, will have the last say about what is needed in practice to ensure the voice is not an empty vessel. The SG’s analysis of this critical issue is thin.

As former High Court judge Ian Callinan wrote in his submission to the inquiry, it wasn’t until 1992 when the High Court had existed for 90 years that it discovered in the Constitution’s text and structure an implied right to freedom of political communication. It would, said Callinan, “be imprudent to underestimate the capacity of any future High Court for ingenuity and originality”.

The other weakness in the SG’s advice is his claim that we need not worry about lawfare and litigation from the voice concerning executive decisions given this kind of litigation has been with us since the 1970s.

By relying on the level of past litigation concerning very specific legislative provisions and specific projects, the SG is drawing a comparison between an old pop gun and a new rocket.

What is being proposed here is a brand-new source of litigation, a big new collective right cemented in the Constitution empowering this new body to make representations about all matters relating to Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander people over everything from finance and the budget to health and education to environment and defence decisions.

As Callinan says, the voice’s constitutional power is unqualified: “it does not say core matters, or matters wholly, predominantly, substantially, partially, exclusively, essentially” related to ATIS people. “Everything is at large,” he wrote. This is not an accident or oversight in drafting. Yes advocates knew exactly what they wanted from this proposed voice, and they got it. They don’t trust parliament with the final say. They are counting, as elite activists often do, on the courts doing an end run around democracy by having the final say on matters that parliament cannot alter.

Callinan raises another pertinent point: while the SG’s advice is worth having, it is the court’s opinion that matters. Callinan gives as an example the Love decision, where the High Court, in a 4:3 decision, wandered into some wondrous constitutional lawmaking to stop the federal government deporting non-citizen criminals. “I doubt whether many lawyers or the Solicitor-General, who unsuccessfully argued for the commonwealth, gave an opinion predicting that outcome.”

Let’s circle back to another dizzy submission. Dismissing legal concerns about the voice, Anne Twomey, George Williams and former High Court judge Kenneth Hayne appeared at the inquiry to assure us that, politically speaking, the new voice body will behave responsibly. How on earth can they know that?

As Callinan submitted, it is “a brave claim to have the measure of social and political capital at any time”. Most people and almost all political organisations probe and expand the outer range of their powers, he wrote.

Callinan’s last point packs another punch. He mentions the irony of so many well-intentioned and highly regarded legal experts “echoing the language so often and infamously used by the late Sir Johannes Bjelke-Petersen to reporters seeking information about government: ‘Don’t you worry about that.’ ”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/voice-inquiry-is-an-exercise-in-groupthink/news-story/16874c5032fe3e6ffb970baf55510bb4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18755008

File: 77d6e455a1765b2⋯.jpg (77.41 KB,1024x768,4:3,Commissioner_Terence_Cole_….jpg)

File: e28995b14645377⋯.jpg (128.38 KB,1024x768,4:3,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18676743

Top jurist Terence Cole slams Albanese government’s Voice proposal

James Morrow - April 25, 2023

One of Australia’s leading jurists has blasted the Albanese government’s proposed Voice to Parliament referendum, saying it is “wrong in principle” and will “split the Australian people permanently into two groups based on race.”

Terence Cole, a former judge on the NSW Court of Appeals who presided over two royal commissions, made the claims in a bombshell submission to a joint parliamentary committee on the Voice.

In the submission Mr Cole noted that the voice is just one part of the broader program of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which calls for “treaty” and “truth telling” as well as a Voice to parliament, and which the Albanese government has accepted in its entirety.

“The voice is critical to the objectives made clear in the Uluru Statement … that Aboriginals wish to establish … sovereignty over Australian territory, ownership of Australian land and surrounding waters … monetary and other compensation … (and) truth telling,” he wrote.

“To achieve (these) objectives, it is necessary to split the Australian people permanently into two groups based solely on race … this is wrong in principle.”

“A Makaratta (truth-telling) commission would look backwards, trawling over events, legislation, policies, and administrative actions over the past 225 years to discover areas of discontent in the minds of present living Aboriginals … and to award compensation.”

Since winning government, Anthony Albanese has repeatedly underlined for his support for he entire Uluru Statement, opening his acceptance speech after last year’s election saying, “On behalf of the Australian Labor Party, I commit to the Uluru Statement from the heart in full.”

As part of his submission, Mr Cole also attached a separate paper he authored in which he noted that “when asked to vote to amend the Constitution to incorporate the Voice, Australians need to understand that the Voice will be used to support the demands for recognition of coexisting sovereignty, a Makarrata commission designed to produce a treaty and monetary compensation, and a rewriting of Australian history.”

“The potential for great irredeemable harm to Australian society means the voice should never be incorporated into the Australian constitution, which should be amended only if such amendment advantages Australian society as a whole.”

“The Voice does not,” he wrote.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/top-jurist-terence-cole-slams-albanese-governments-voice-proposal/news-story/f30cd862cfbafd6d405b6903c905b3ea

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18755020

File: ac54c4a0433422d⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,5147x3431,5147:3431,Describing_a_possible_Chin….jpg)

>>18744473

Time running out to prevent war over Taiwan, Japanese ambassador warns

Matthew Knott - April 26, 2023

1/2

Time is running out for Australia and other democracies to deter China from launching an invasion of Taiwan, Japan’s departing ambassador to Australia has warned.

Shingo Yamagami, whose Canberra posting ends this weekend after almost 2½ years, accused his Chinese counterpart of launching a character assassination against him and rejected suggestions in the diplomatic community he had been called back to Tokyo early because of his outspoken style.

Australians needed to abandon outdated stereotypes that Japanese diplomats would be placid and softly spoken, he said.

As the Albanese government seeks to stabilise the nation’s diplomatic and trade relationship with Beijing after years of tension, Yamagami urged Australia not to overlook the risk China posed to peace and security in the Asia-Pacific.

Describing a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan as an increasing concern, Yamagami said: “My point is: time is running out.

“Time is quite limited because our response has been slow. So rather than letting our counterpart think they see a window of opportunity to resort to military action, we have to do our best to narrow or even close that window of opportunity.

“That is why we need to come up with prompt action in terms of increasing our deterrence.”

Yamagami said Japan and Australia must prepare for the possibility that China would invade the self-governing island, which it claims as an inalienable part of its territory.

“If you look at past history, deterrence could fail,” he said in an interview at the Japanese embassy in Canberra.

The government’s defence strategic review, released this week, declared China was threatening Australia’s national interests by undermining the rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific and failing to be transparent about its dramatic military expansion.

The most dramatic moment in Yamagami’s tenure came in January when Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian claimed he was not doing his job and accused him of trying to drive a wedge between Beijing and Canberra.

Yamagami, who is regularly described as a China hawk, said he had restricted his comments to “policy matters of substance” between Japan and China.

“But when I’m engaging in that serious business, I get a sniper shot in the form of character assassination,” he said.

“That is totally uncalled for, not productive at all.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18755022

File: 681ab12c135926a⋯.jpg (379.25 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Japanese_ambassador_to_Aus….jpg)

>>18755020

2/2

Tokyo and Canberra have elevated their security partnership to unprecedented heights over recent years, leading to expectations Japan could become a quasi fourth member of the AUKUS security pact between the United States, United Kingdom and Australia.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed on Wednesday he would host Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, US President Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Sydney on May 24, the first time a Quad security dialogue leaders’ meeting has been held in Australia.

Yamagami said Japan’s national security strategy, released in December, made it “crystal clear” that China was the nation’s greatest security challenge.

“That’s the first time the Japanese government has come up with that description,” he said, pointing to China’s rapid military build-up and “assertive and sometimes even aggressive external stance”.

China regularly undermined Japanese sovereignty by sending its patrol ships and fighter jets into Japanese territorial waters and airspace, he said.

Yamagami said he was “saddened and even dismayed” by suggestions the Japanese government had cut short his tenure because of his comments on China or calls for Australia not to introduce energy policies that harm coal and gas exports to Japan.

“It is an ordinary reshuffle of ambassadors,” he said, stating that Japanese diplomats usually served shorter terms than envoys from other nations.

“What I have been saying is completely in line with what is on the mind of Japanese policymakers … I think the general perception of Japanese diplomats, government officials or even businesspeople might have been that they are reticent, quiet followers.

“In light of the recent development of the relationship between Australia and Japan, I would say many Australians need to get used to Japanese [people] speaking their mind because without honest, candid, to-the-point discussions we cannot have a really solid strategic partnership between us.”

Yamagami, who raised some eyebrows within Labor because of his close relationships with Coalition figures, said he was honoured to receive a farewell gift of an engraved Seiko watch from former prime ministers Scott Morrison, Tony Abbott and John Howard describing him as “Japan’s greatest envoy”.

Yamagami said he was “appalled” by the hostile reaction from some commentators to this masthead’s recent Red Alert series exploring how Australia could be affected by a possible war between China and the US over Taiwan.

“You cannot shut up substantive discussion,” he said. “That is not the way to go.”

Asked about Australian children being taken into sole custody by Japanese parents under the nation’s divorce laws, Yamagami said he understood the issue “from the bottom of my heart” because he had not seen his son for two years after he and his wife separated.

“The basic idea behind Australia’s family law is joint parenting, whereas in Japan we are still based on the idea of single-parent custody,” he said.

Yamagami urged Australians not to lecture Japan about the sensitive issue, the subject of a recent investigation by this masthead and 60 Minutes.

“I do understand this is one of the most emotional and difficult issues facing us, but with a little more mutual respect and tolerance I think we can lower the temperature,” he said.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/time-running-out-to-prevent-war-over-taiwan-japanese-ambassador-warns-20230426-p5d3dm.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18755037

File: a98211f4a968af5⋯.jpg (106.42 KB,864x1420,216:355,Malka_Leifer_was_found_gui….jpg)

File: fa0ea7095959915⋯.jpg (93.31 KB,1200x675,16:9,Malka_Leifer_was_found_gui….jpg)

>>18630905 (pb)

>>18631081 (pb)

Convicted pedophile teacher Malka Leifer to seek leniency in sentencing

Former Adass Israel School principal Malka Leifer, found guilty of rape and sex assault charges, will seek a more lenient sentence by arguing about the “hardship” she’s suffered in prison.

Ashley Argoon - April 26, 2023

Convicted pedophile teacher Malka Leifer is set to argue “hardship” she has experienced in prison and the threat of deportation to try to get a more lenient sentence.

Leifer will face a two-day pre-sentencing hearing in June after she was found guilty earlier this month of 18 rape and sexual assault charges against students at the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick.

Defence barrister Ian Hill KC on Wednesday told the County Court he would be making submissions as to the “hardship” Leifer had suffered while in custody.

He also raised the question of “what occurs to her” at the end of any fixed non-parole period “in terms of deportation, and whether the authorities will in fact grant her parole”.

That question paved the way for Leifer’s lawyers to argue whether she would get the benefit of parole, or instead have to serve out her maximum sentence before being deported.

But Judge Mark Gamble told the barrister he was heading “into the realms of speculation”.

Leifer, who was principal of the school that catered to Melbourne’s ultra-orthodox Jewish community, tuned into the hearing via video link from prison.

She did not speak, instead nodding her head to indicate she could hear the court, and held her hand across her mouth for the duration of the hearing.

Earlier this month, she was found guilty of sexually abusing sisters Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper, and acquitted of abuse against eldest sister Nicole Meyer.

The trio was in court for the short administrative hearing on Wednesday, where lawyers set out a timetable for Leifer’s future matters.

Leifer’s potential deportation comes after a years-long fight to extradite her back to Australia from Israel, after she fled Melbourne upon learning of the sex abuse accusations in 2008.

She will return to the County Court to face a two-day plea hearing on June 28.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-victoria/convicted-pedophile-teacher-malka-leifer-to-seek-leniency-in-sentencing/news-story/3481338a7991350452d6adeec1a189dc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18755069

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch face another giant legal claim over Fox News 'disinformation'

Marina Freri and Sarah Ferguson - 25 April 2023

1/2

The lawyer representing voting technology company, Smartmatic, says Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch are key to the $US2.7 billion ($4.05 billion) case they have brought against Fox News and Fox Corporation.

The US cable news network is accused of spreading disinformation in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, in support of Donald Trump's false claims the election was stolen.

"Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch, from our perspective, are front and centre to the decision making that was done at Fox Corporation that allowed and encouraged this type of disinformation," Erik Connolly told 7.30.

Smartmatic is a voting technology company that operates across the globe including in Australia. It filed a suit against Fox and a number of its presenters in 2021 after the media organisation broadcast claims that it was part of a widespread conspiracy to rig the 2020 election, in concert with Dominion, another voting technology company.

Last week Dominion settled their case against Fox, receiving $US787.5 million in damages.

Mr Connolly said his client's case alleges Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch were part of the decision making at the network during the heated post-election period in the US.

"There are definitely allegations that both Dominion has made, and that Smartmatic has made that these two individuals were directing traffic here," he told 7.30.

"And it's difficult to imagine something this sizeable occurring at Fox News that was not getting the attention and the direction of the two principals for Fox Corporation.

"What Fox published was twofold. One, Smartmatic and Dominion conspired together to rig the election … And the second main message was Dominion machines using Smartmatic software rigged the 2020 election and switched votes in favour of Joe Biden."

Mr Connolly commented on the level of damages the company is seeking against Fox. "When you look at the damage done to Smartmatic, I have a company that before this disinformation campaign was conducting and handling elections all over the world in five continents in over 50 countries," he said.

"So, the damages in this case is a very simple exercise: What was the value of my company before this disinformation campaign took place? And what's the value of that company today as a result of that … Because nothing can do more damage to a company like Smartmatic than what these defendants said."

Damaging democracy to win back audience

In statement Fox said, "We will be ready to defend this case surrounding extremely newsworthy events when it goes to trial, likely in 2025.

"As a report prepared by our financial expert shows, Smartmatic's damages claims are implausible, disconnected from reality, and on its face intended to chill First Amendment freedoms."

But Mr Connolly claims evidence will show that Fox deliberately broadcast false accusations of electoral fraud in a bid to recover audience who had deserted the network.

"This was done in order to win back an audience indeed because of fear about competition from emerging news organisations. And what you saw on the Dominion evidence was very consistent with what we have alleged," he said.

Material that emerged during the Dominion case suggests viewers quit the network after Fox correctly called the key state of Arizona for Mr Biden, frustrating Mr Trump's winning narrative.

Mr Connolly alleges the network knew what it was doing in promoting Mr Trump's lawyers and advisers making wild claims on air.

"I have a significant amount of evidence showing that Fox knew what they were saying wasn't true," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18755073

File: ad1a5392cc66a62⋯.jpg (1.06 MB,4069x3158,4069:3158,Fox_Corporation_s_Rupert_a….jpg)

File: 42d81e32a26938f⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Dominion_lawyers_embrace_a….jpg)

File: bc207cf318fdf1a⋯.jpg (2.01 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Former_US_president_Donald….jpg)

File: 619495e89bc74bb⋯.jpg (3.8 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Fox_denies_any_wrongdoing_….jpg)

>>18755069

2/2

Undermining democracy worldwide

Smartmatic played a small role in the 2020 presidential election.

"My client Smartmatic was in LA County. They provided election services during the 2020 election in LA County and LA County only," Mr Connolly said.

"And yet, somehow, under this narrative that Fox was spinning, we rigged a national election, and we were switching votes, in states and in jurisdictions where we weren't even participating. That is an extraordinary degree of recklessness."

The effects of that disinformation campaign, Mr Connolly claims, went far beyond the United States.

"This disinformation and how it undermines the trust in democracy has a real effect, a real negative effect on democracy and voting all over the world.

"This is one of the most catastrophic events for democracy and the belief and integrity of elections that you could imagine."

With the 2024 presidential election looming, Mr Connolly said the implications of Fox's promotion of the "Big Lie" will be felt when voters head to the polls next year.

"You still see situations where people are running away from election technology, thinking that there's a risk that their vote won't be counted," he said.

"And so there's a fear factor out there. And so it has not gone away at all. And as we move forward into the 2024 election, which is around the corner, I expect that it's just going to intensify."

Zero societal interest

Fox claims it was merely publishing newsworthy information about the President's claims the election was stolen.

Mr Connolly said the courts in the US have dismissed that concept, saying there are certain types of speech that have zero societal interest.

"One category of speech that courts have said have no societal interest and are not deserving of constitutional protection is an intentional lie. We're talking about an intentional lie here," he said.

The case is still in the discovery stage, headed to trial in 2025.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-25/lachlan-rupert-murdoch-fox-news-face-another-giant-legal-claim/102264406

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEG44Rcp9i4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18755136

File: 5db564e23851bc8⋯.jpg (175.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_on_Wednes….jpg)

File: 33cee2ea0071600⋯.jpg (330.04 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Anthony_Albanese_Joe_Biden….jpg)

File: 4d2ba9526f014d1⋯.jpg (115 KB,825x307,825:307,AA_11.jpg)

>>18670549

Anthony Albanese reacts to Joe Biden's re-election bid ahead of US President travelling to Sydney for Quad meeting

Anthony Albanese has reacted to his "friend" Joe Biden's re-election announcement as he prepares to welcome the United States President to Sydney next month for the Quad Leaders' Summit.

Bryant Hevesi - April 26, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described Joe Biden as "a friend of Australia" as he was quizzed on news of the United States President's re-election bid.

Mr Biden announced on Tuesday he would be seeking another four-year term in 2024 "to stand up for democracy" and because it was "time to finish the job".

The 80-year-old will visit Australia next month for the third in-person Quad Leaders' Summit, alongside Mr Albanese and the leaders of Japan and India.

Mr Albanese told reporters in Sydney on Wednesday Mr Biden "will be a very welcome visitor" when he makes his first trip Down Under as President.

"President Biden I regard as a friend and he's certainly a friend of Australia. I don't comment on the internal politics of the United States," the Prime Minister said.

"That's a matter for the people of the United States. But can I say this: President Biden will be a very welcome visitor here in Australia.

"We will have more to say about his activities while he is here but I very much welcome him."

Mr Albanese most recently met with Mr Biden in California last month, where the pair announced the submarines Australia would be acquiring through AUKUS.

The Prime Minister will also travel to the United States in November to take part in the APEC Summit, with another visit for bilateral talks on the cards.

"I thank him for the warm welcome that I received in San Diego for the AUKUS announcements," Mr Albanese said.

"I'll be visiting the United States when President Biden hosts the APEC meeting in the second half of this year in San Francisco.

"And I have of course have also been invited to the United States. We will finalise details for a bilateral visit for me to the US as well."

Mr Albanese announced on Wednesday the Quad Leaders' meeting will be held at the Sydney Opera House on May 24.

"Prior to that and around that there will be various events, the details with the three leaders that will be announced," he said.

"The hosting of this Quad Leaders' meeting at the Sydney Opera House, Australia's most recognisable building, will be a chance for us to work co-operatively with the United States, Japan and India.

"But also… an enormous opportunity to showcase this beautiful city in this wonderful country to the entire world.

"For the days before, during and after, there will be a world showcase on this city and on our nation of Australia."

Mr Albanese's first overseas trip as Prime Minister following the Federal Election was to Japan for last year's Quad Leader's meeting.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida will be in Sydney alongside Mr Albanese and Mr Biden for this year's event.

"We'll be discussing the global economic environment that we know is under pressure due to global inflationary pressures," Mr Albanese said.

"We know that we live in a more insecure world, with strategic competition in our region, with the ongoing impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

"We also know that our friends are ones which we have such a strong relationship with and during the hosting of the meeting at the Sydney Opera House it will be an opportunity to discuss all of those issues.

"And our common interests as democracies, as vibrant economies, as countries who want to work with each other for our common interests in the Indo-Pacific region."

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/anthony-albanese-reacts-to-joe-bidens-reelection-bid-ahead-of-us-president-travelling-to-sydney-for-quad-meeting/news-story/88e4c1fae56a3ee616934551f29b218c

https://twitter.com/AlboMP/status/1651014634760183809

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760659

File: 4ae94f4b964a5c2⋯.jpg (162 KB,1280x720,16:9,Yipirinya_School_principal….jpg)

>>18687374

>>18754977

Federal MP Marion Scrymgour backs ‘safe school’ for Indigenous children in Alice Springs

LIAM MENDES - APRIL 27, 2023

Northern Territory federal Labor MP Marion Scrymgour has backed moves by Alice Springs principal Gavin Morris to get Indigenous children off the streets and into the classroom by providing safe accommodation for them at school.

Ms Scrymgour will meet Dr Morris as early as Saturday to work through issues needed to fast-track the groundbreaking proposal for a residential facility – part of it secure – for students and says she will push federal Education Minister Jason Clare to consider using funding earmarked for education in Central Australia.

A proposal commissioned by Dr Morris for his Yipirinya School by building consultants Donald Cant Watts Corke estimates a total building cost of $12m for four cottages housing 24 students with staff accommodation in the same units.

Ms Scrymgour said the plans were essential in order to get youth “re-engaged” in the education system.

“We can’t have another generation that becomes illiterate and disengaged from the system and then just ends up on the scrap heap,” she said. “We’ve got to give young people some hope that they can live somewhere safely but they need to re-engage in the school system.”

The development comes after Dr Morris revealed in The Australian how children are sometimes returned to school in handcuffs or wearing ankle bracelets and how a 12-year-old and his mates led teachers on a wild pursuit through the town in a stolen minibus.

NT Chief Minister Natasha Fyles declined to respond directly to questions about Dr Morris’s proposal but said the Territory government would “stand up two facilities that families can go to when they are displaced and in need of support services. This is to ensure we can get these families back on their feet, back to community or into longer-term accommodation and kids back to school.”

Yipirinya School has more than 200 Indigenous students from the town camps and outstations of Alice Springs, catering for some of the most disadvantaged students in the nation.

The school was founded by Indigenous elders and teaches in four Indigenous languages.

Ms Scrymgour said that what Dr Morris was proposing should be supported but called for the accommodation to be built in a separate location than the grounds of Yipirinya, accessible to all students in Alice Springs.

She proposed a central facility that other high schools could “feed into”, and allowing it to be resourced with government and non-government agencies.

“Centralian High in Alice Springs (also) has issues with kids needing somewhere to stay,” she said. “If you’re going to have a boarding facility for some of these kids I think it shouldn’t be attached to any one school … there’s a real need in Alice Springs.”

Dr Morris said he would be delighted to work with Ms Scrymgour to come up with a viable proposal,” he said.

“I’m very flexible in making sure that we work with people like Marion to ensure that we get a solution and we get action.

“I’m happy to explore actions that might not necessarily be on the Yipirinya school site, but also acknowledging this request has come from our key Elders, from community, it’s not my idea.”

Ms Scrymgour said she would also support a secure facility in Alice Springs for young people as an alternative to the controversial Don Dale Youth Detention Centre in Darwin.

“When we’re talking about youth crime, if the kids aren’t going to be sent to Don Dale, but to get them off the streets and as part of their bail conditions, they need to go into a secure facility,” she said. “There is no facility in Alice Springs for that to happen.”

Ms Scrymgour said she would meet with Dr Morris “as early as Saturday” to come to a solution.

“The one minister I’d like to bring in on this is (federal education minister) Jason Clare … there was some money that was earmarked for education in the central Australian plains, so I want to just talk through some stuff with Gavin, and then maybe have a chat with Jason Clare …” She also called for a similar project to be looked at in Katherine, three hours southeast of Darwin.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/federal-mp-marion-scrymgour-backs-safe-school-for-indigenous-children-in-alice-springs/news-story/15af90cfc33af5fc4546b489c4ab3bd0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760676

File: db878aa98ce87e5⋯.jpg (125.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_advertisement_is_paid_….jpg)

File: 47f98dcac06b7a9⋯.jpg (117.34 KB,1280x736,40:23,SUPPORT_FOR_AN_INDIGENOUS_….jpg)

>>18719335

>>18676743

>>18719348

Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaign launches advertising blitz as support softens

GEOFF CHAMBERS and PAIGE TAYLOR - APRIL 27, 2023

The Yes campaign will launch an advertising blitz this week amid falling support for Anthony Albanese’s referendum to constitutionally enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament.

SEC Newgate Mood of the ­Nation tracking polling reveals a further softening in voter support for a voice to parliament, dropping from a 59 per cent high ahead of last year’s May federal election to 52 per cent this month.

While the survey of 1200 voters, conducted between April 13 and 18, shows a slim majority in favour of the voice, there has been a hardening in opposition to the Indigenous advisory body.

The poll, which did not reference the constitutional amendment wording that a voice advisory body would also make representations to the executive government, found opposition against the referendum had risen from 16 to 27 per cent.

With many Australians still not engaged on the referendum, which is expected in October or November, about a fifth of voters said they neither supported nor opposed a voice to parliament. The survey said 30 per cent of Australians strongly supported a voice, compared with 17 per cent who were strongly opposed.

Queensland and Western Australia continue to report the softest support for the voice. In Queensland, 41 per cent of voters are in support versus 34 per cent against. In WA, the split is 43 per cent compared with 30 per cent against. An alliance of Yes supporters – backed by political advisers CT Group – on Wednesday launched its first advertisement on news websites and on television but it did not say the word voice.

Instead, the 30-second advertisement narrated by Gadigal elder Allen Madden refers to the voice without naming it, saying the referendum is a chance to “give Indigenous Australians a real say in their future”.

The advertisement is paid for by Yes23, which receives donations through Australians for ­Indigenous Constitutional Recognition. That organisation is a ­registered charity co-chaired by filmmaker Rachel Perkins and lawyer Daniel Gilbert. The largest known donation to the group is from the Paul Ramsay Foundation, which in February gave $5m to the Yes campaign.

Directors on the board of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition include non-Aboriginal business leaders Michael Chaney, the chairman of Wesfarmers, and Mark Textor, the pollster and communications strategist who co-founded global firm CT Group, formerly Crosby Textor. Indigenous people on the board include Karen Mundine, chief executive of Reconciliation Australia, and Darwin author Thomas Mayo.

The Fair Australia No campaign, backed by conservative ­activist group Advance and led by opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, launched its first major television ad last week.

The No campaign, which has run focus groups in Perth, Hobart, Brisbane and Adelaide and commissioned large sample tracking polling in WA, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania, will focus its resources on states reporting soft support for the voice.

No campaign strategists, who have signed-up almost 90,000 supporters, will struggle to match the manpower and funding of the Yes side in the battle for votes.

There are two competing No campaigns with Warren Mundine leading the Recognise a Better Way campaign alongside former deputy prime minister John Anderson and former Keating government minister Gary Johns.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/yes-campaign-advertising-blitz-as-support-softens-for-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/908bff743d03143db8c2df026bb56c60

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760683

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18760676

Join Us

Yes23

Apr 26, 2023

‘Join Us’ is just the first step in a many months-long conversation with Australians between now and the referendum, which will include more national commercials and talking to everyday Australians about the opportunity to be part of a successful referendum.

www.yes23.com.au/joinus

#yes23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oGRIz7yccw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760697

File: 0e163a2483e28dd⋯.jpg (67.81 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_Australian_Electoral_C….jpg)

>>18676743

Indigenous voice referendum results may not be known on voting day, AEC commissioner warns

Electoral commission says postal votes may lead to delay in clear result as information and enrolment campaign ramps up

Josh Butler - 27 Apr 2023

The result of the Indigenous voice referendum may not be known on voting day or for some time afterward, with the electoral commissioner warning people “may be disappointed” if they expect a definitive answer on the night.

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is also concerned about dangerous mis- and disinformation circulating ahead of the referendum, already stamping out voting-related conspiracy theories imported from the US.

Polling workers will also get more training and security after what the commissioner, Tom Rogers, called “disturbing” incidents at recent elections, including staff being filmed and accused of stealing ballot papers, and online threats of violence.

The AEC is still debunking claims about Dominion voting machines, an electoral technology at the centre of conspiracy theories around the 2020 US election, but which Australia has never used.

“It’s as nutty as it can get … people are still peddling this conspiracy theory,” Rogers said.

The AEC is planning a significant public awareness campaign around the referendum, Australia’s first in 24 years, which will take place in the last quarter of 2023. Mid-October is seen as a likely timeframe.

Rogers stressed the AEC’s role was to talk about and debunk misinformation regarding the electoral process only, and would not weigh in on the content of the referendum itself or the Indigenous voice.

The AEC is already running information campaigns on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Reddit, similar to work through recent elections. It will translate the official information pamphlet into nearly 60 languages, including at least 20 Indigenous languages.

Rogers said the commission was already addressing previously debunked electoral falsehoods, as well as people misunderstanding the referendum processes. The AEC is concerned some voters may confuse the rules of the 2017 marriage equality postal survey with the referendum.

Unlike the postal survey, it is compulsory to vote in a referendum, and the result is binding.

In a media briefing, Rogers said national enrolment was around 97%, with Indigenous enrolment around 84.5%. The AEC is undertaking further enrolment drives especially targeting Indigenous Australians, with the deputy commissioner, Jeff Pope, saying reforms allowing enrolment with only a Medicare card had added tens of thousands of people to the electoral roll.

The AEC’s information campaign will also draw attention to the referendum count. For a proposal to be successful, it must achieve a “double majority” – a national majority plus a majority of voters in four out of six states.

Rogers noted the rise in the use of postal votes, which may take days to arrive and be counted.

“I get [that] people really want a result,” he said. “I’d just caution them, if this is a really close result, people are going to be disappointed if they’re expecting a result on the night.”

The AEC will publish results on a rolling basis once polls close at 6pm on voting day, like a standard election. Results will be displayed online on a national count and a state-by-state count, plus by polling booth and electorate.

The latest Guardian Essential poll found 60% in favour of the Indigenous voice.

Rogers said the AEC was working with social media companies to remove dangerous online activity. He said there had been “vague references to violence against AEC staff”, and noted incidents at the New South Wales state election where polling workers had been filmed or subjected to conspiracy theories about stealing votes.

Rogers said the AEC had given staff at the Aston byelection “additional resources to assist”, including examining security arrangements and providing workers with paper handouts to give to concerned voters, outlining what polling staff were legally allowed to do.

The AEC’s digital engagement director, Evan Ekin-Smyth, said there had been a “stark” escalation in issues online between the 2019 and 2022 elections, including conspiracy theories emanating from overseas.

“It’s probably continuing on in what I’d categorise as a downward trend in terms of its nature,” he said, “which is disappointing, but makes our role even more important”.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/27/indigenous-voice-referendum-results-may-not-be-known-on-voting-day-aec-commissioner-warns

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760729

File: 9af2b1c40c68b01⋯.jpg (129.51 KB,1024x567,1024:567,It_has_been_revealed_retir….jpg)

File: 2254fbde0964025⋯.jpg (544.26 KB,3000x1921,3000:1921,James_Clapper_was_the_US_d….jpg)

>>18749496

Retired US admirals charging Australian taxpayers thousands of dollars per day as defence consultants

Andrew Greene - 27 April 2023

A cavalcade of retired senior American military officers have landed high-paying advisory contracts with Australia's Department of Defence, with one former admiral paid $US5,000 ($7,560) a day for his expertise.

The ABC can also reveal one of America's top spies worked for an Australian intelligence agency a year after resigning as US director of National Intelligence, when Donald Trump became president.

Details of the arrangements have been disclosed by the Pentagon for the first time, revealing how senior American officers have leveraged their military service over the past decade to obtain work from foreign governments, including in Australia.

According to the documents which were provided by the Pentagon to Congress last month, dozens of retired US military figures have been granted approval to work for Australia since 2012.

In one instance, retired Admiral John Richardson, who headed the US Navy from 2015 to 2019, receives $US5,000 a day as a part-time consultant under a contract with Australia's defence department, struck last year.

As part of the consulting arrangement made through Washington DC based consulting firm Burdeshaw Associates, the former admiral also receives travel and lodging expenses to complete his work in Australia.

Australian government records state the year-long contract for his "advisory services" began in November 2022 and was awarded without tender "due to an absence of competition for technical reasons".

Last week Australia's defence department confirmed another former vice-admiral, William Hilarides, has been paid almost $2.5 million for advice given through the Naval Shipbuilding Advisory Board and Naval Shipbuilding Expert Advisory Panel since 2016.

This week the ABC revealed Mr Hilarides has also been selected to run a fresh review of the size and structure of the Royal Australian Navy's surface fleet, and according to Pentagon records he charges a daily rate of $US4,000 ($6,000).

The documents first obtained by the Washington Post also reveal in 2019 the ACT government hired a former US Navy commander to work as an advisor in the Chief Minister, Treasury and Economic Development Directorate for the equivalent of $US170,000.

Top US spy paid to help set up Office of National Intelligence

One of the more intriguing revelations from the Pentagon records is that the former US director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who resigned after Donald Trump's election as president in 2016, was then paid to work for Australia's new Office of National Intelligence.

In 2017, the United States Air Force veteran — who had served as under secretary of defence for Intelligence — was appointed as a visiting Distinguished Professor at the Australian National University and addressed the National Press Club in Canberra.

According to the newly released Pentagon records, Mr Clapper then in 2018 received an undisclosed sum to work with the Office of National Intelligence (ONI) in Canberra, which was formally established in December of that year.

During his 2017 visit Mr Clapper had praised then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull's decision to create ONI as a single point of intelligence coordination which would bring Australia into line with its Five Eyes partners the US and UK.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-27/retired-senior-american-military-officers-contracts-defence/102269580

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/04/25/retired-nsa-director-won-lucrative-consulting-deals-with-saudis-japan/

https://qalerts.pub/?q=clapper

https://qalerts.pub/?q=JC

https://qalerts.pub/?q=J+C

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760742

File: 0d1361139735c09⋯.jpg (31.81 KB,646x363,646:363,Richard_Haass_has_worked_f….jpg)

>>18670474

>>18670521

>>18670549

AUKUS safe under Trump, says top US diplomat

Latika Bourke - April 27, 2023

Delphi, Greece: One of the United States’ most experienced diplomats says AUKUS is likely to prosper if former president Donald Trump is re-elected.

The comments were made to the Delphi Economic Forum, under way in Greece, by Richard Haass, who served four former presidents, including George W. Bush, and former secretary of state Colin Powell, and is now the outgoing head of the non-aligned Council of Foreign Relations.

Trump is firming as favourite to win the Republican nomination in a second election contest between the former president and incumbent Joe Biden. Biden beat Trump in 2020 and announced this week that he will seek a second term in 2024.

US foreign policy was erratic and often isolationist during Trump’s chaotic time in office when he pursued an “America First” strategy, prompting questions to Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese about whether the deal would be safe if Trump was back in charge. Albanese said the bilateral relationship was one between nations, not leaders.

Asked by this masthead if a re-elected Trump would pose any threat to the deal to supply Australia with nuclear-powered submarines, Haass said that was unlikely.

“I don’t think it would be particularly problematic in the sense that one of the, I would argue, contributions of the Trump foreign policy was to introduce a more realistic assessment of China,” Haass said.

“I think there [were] many high expectations across multiple administrations that integration of China would happen successfully, this goes back over 2½ decades, and that China would become more open politically, more market-oriented economically and more moderate in its foreign policy.

“And as has come to pass, needless to say, we now have something of a consensus that’s more sceptical of China [and] more willing to push back against it.

“And I would think that arrangements like AUKUS are consistent with that … I would think that arrangements like that would be likely to continue and to even prosper regardless [of who is in the Oval Office].”

AUKUS was struck by former prime ministers Scott Morrison, Britain’s Boris Johnson and Biden and caused dismay in the Elysee Palace. French President Emmanuel Macron accused Morrison of lying to him over the now-aborted contract for France’s Naval Group to supply Australia with diesel submarines.

But Macron’s own commitment to the Indo-Pacific has come under question recently following his trip to Beijing. On the way home he said Europe should strike “strategic autonomy” from the United States and avoid getting dragged into a conflict between the US and China over Taiwan. Chinese President Xi Jinping has threatened to take over the self-ruled democratic island using military force if necessary.

The head of the US Air Mobility Command, Mike Minihan, has been quoted in a leaked memo as saying the US could be at war with China as soon as 2025.

But Haass said there was no inevitability to a hot war in the Taiwan Strait, despite escalating tensions between the two superpowers. He said deterring conflict would take enormous statecraft by both sides.

“Nothing’s inevitable … I don’t believe anything’s inevitable with Taiwan,” he said.

“I worked for four presidents; Carter, Reagan, Bush and Bush, the idea that anything is inevitable is impossible.

“It’s a challenge to American and Chinese statecraft and we’ll see how it plays out.”

Haass, who was involved in the peace process in Northern Ireland, said a conflict over Taiwan would have enormous effects on Europe and he hoped Europe would come to a position where it continued “normal trade” with China but quarantined technology and strategic industries.

This is the model advocated by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

He said the positive emergence of Japan and Germany from their World War II postures was the defining change of the disruption to the world order currently taking place.

“We’re finally beginning to see the emergence of a post-post World War II where both of these countries are becoming more normal in their willingness and ability to take on larger security obligations and responsibility.

“It’s an under-appreciated development.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/aukus-safe-under-trump-says-top-us-diplomat-20230426-p5d3k3.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760753

File: 92be4905f3f3963⋯.jpg (106.11 KB,1200x675,16:9,A_push_to_ban_Nazi_symbols….jpg)

>>18517224 (pb)

>>18538063 (pb)

ASIO backs federal push to ban Nazi symbolism

Rachael Ward - 27 April 2023

Australia's spy agency says a proposed bill outlawing Nazi symbols could help stop extremist radicalisation and recruitment.

Federal shadow attorney-general Michaelia Cash introduced the bill last month following a protest in Melbourne which drew neo-Nazis, who used the sieg heil salute.

The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation says nationalist and racist violent extremists adopt specific imagery and terminology to signal their ideology, build belonging and provoke opponents.

ASIO believes extremists are currently more focused on trying to attract new members rather than planning an attack and the legislation would help stop that.

"(The bill) would assist law enforcement in early intervention," the agency said in a submission to a parliamentary inquiry.

The Buddhist Council of Western Australia supports the move but wants a clause stating "to avoid doubt, the display of a swastika in connection with Buddhism, Hinduism or Jainism does not constitute the display of a Nazi symbol".

The Australian Christian Lobby has thrown its support behind the bill but agrees the current wording should be altered.

"We are concerned that the Bill's wording could unintentionally capture the public display of any genuine Christian symbols which may be confused as or appropriated as Nazi symbols. We suggest the draft Bill be amended to expressly exclude that possibility," it wrote.

The bill prompted fiery debate in the senate last month and tensions boiled over as Liberal senator Sarah Henderson cried in the chamber after an exchange with Labor Minister Murray Watt.

The bill was prompted following a Melbourne rally organised by British anti-trans activist Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull and attended by members of the National Socialist Movement.

Some people performed the Nazi salute outside Victorian Parliament and held signs calling transgender people offensive names, sparking clashes as police held back counter protesters.

Victorian upper house MP Moira Deeming attended the event and was later suspended from the Liberal party for nine months.

The Victorian government is moving to amend existing laws banning Nazi symbols in public to also include the Nazi salute.

Most states and territories have or are in the process of banning displays of Nazi symbols, with the salute covered in some jurisdictions.

All existing and proposed bans make exceptions including for Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and other groups for whom the swastika is an important symbol predating Nazism.

https://thewest.com.au/politics/asio-backs-federal-push-to-ban-nazi-symbolism-c-10470841

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760774

File: ccb9445990c7749⋯.mp4 (15.56 MB,640x360,16:9,Protesters_clash_over_drag….mp4)

>>18530774 (pb)

‘Paedophiles’: Protesters opposed to drag queen event hurl abuse at councillors

Sophie Aubrey - April 26, 2023

1/2

Protesters opposing a planned drag story time event have called councillors paedophiles and derailed a Monash City Council meeting on Wednesday after the south-eastern Melbourne council refused to give in to abuse and pressure to scrap the family-friendly activity.

Key groups, such as My Place and Reignite Democracy Australia, which espouse views often associated with alt-right or conspiracy theory thinking and can be hostile to the LGBTQ community, rallied supporters to descend on Monash Council’s offices in Glen Waverley on Wednesday night to demand the cancellation of its sold-out drag queen event.

The council-run event, planned for May 19 at Oakleigh Library, will involve drag queen Sam Thompson reading books and singing songs to children and parents to mark International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia.

Extra security staff and Victoria Police officers were called to Wednesday’s council meeting to deal with the estimated crowd of 190 people. The council debated whether to hold the meeting, before eventually opening the doors about 7.15pm.

Mayor Tina Samardzija was forced to temporarily suspend the meeting about an hour later when questions about the drag event agitated the public gallery. Protesters repeatedly labelled councillors “paedophiles” and called for them to be sacked and arrested for promoting “sex in front of our children”.

Chants of “shame on you” and “hands off our kids” were heard. Meanwhile, a group of about 30 counter-protesters protected by police in the lobby of the council building were chanting “trans is beautiful”.

Councillors returned 15 minutes later and pushed on with the meeting agenda.

Staff and councillors have been bombarded with threats of violence and abusive messages, calls and emails for weeks as opponents stepped up a co-ordinated campaign to have the drag event scrapped.

Comments left on social media have labelled the council “absolutely disgusting” and incorrectly link the story time event to child grooming and the sexualisation of minors.

Drag acts and trans rights have become a target for fringe groups that have protested against issues including 5G, 15-minute cities, COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccination.

Boroondara City Council on Wednesday cancelled a drag story time event over fears of threats and anti-social behaviour after “closely monitoring recent events across Victoria”. Casey City Council last month scratched a series of drag performances because of similar protests, while a cafe in Chelsea called off a children’s craft and games event hosted by drag queens after becoming concerned for the safety of performers and staff.

The issue has become a flashpoint since an anti-trans rights demonstration was held outside Victorian parliament on March 18, with some attendees seen performing Nazi salutes.

Protesters have also been seeking to shut down events for transgender people and drag acts in the US and UK.

Monash City Council chief executive Dr Andi Diamond said the council was committed to standing by its drag event to support the LGBTQ community.

“Drag story time introduces children to diverse role models and encourages acceptance, love, and respect of people in our LGBTQIA+ community,” she said.

“We will continue to conduct risk assessments to ensure that it can be delivered safely.”

While the drag event was not an official item on the council meeting agenda, about 30 questions relating to LGBTQ issues were submitted to the council for public question time.

Diamond said the council started to receive a significant and sudden increase in messages, emails and calls in late March when the event was shared through online groups.

“Council is used to working and communicating with people in a heightened state, but the level of anger related to this issue has been concerning, with direct approaches to councillors and staff at times overstepping the line of what we believe to be appropriate,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18760786

File: 2397c3155c94464⋯.jpg (159.66 KB,1270x712,635:356,Inside_the_Monash_Council_….jpg)

File: 8e4c9074e9dd584⋯.jpg (164.48 KB,1266x709,1266:709,People_inside_the_Monash_C….jpg)

File: 960b898deb46f06⋯.jpg (2.73 MB,4000x2668,1000:667,Sean_Mulcahy_and_AJ_Judd_a….jpg)

>>18760774

2/2

Petitions against the drag event were established on Change.org then removed, before a new petition was started on a different platform.

A group called Voice For Kids was recently set up against “radical gender ideology” and nominated Monash Council’s meeting as its first event. “We will send a clear message to Monash councillors that drag queen shows are not appropriate for children,” its website states.

A domain search shows the website is registered to prominent anti-lockdown campaigner Monica Smit and the group she founded, Reignite Democracy Australia. In a tweet, the organisation claimed Voice For Kids was not its project but “helped them create a basic website”.

Key influencers have voiced their objection to the drag event including former basketballer Andrew Bogut and United Australia Party Senator Ralph Babet, who urged others to join him at the council meeting protest. Known figures such as Avi Yemini and Rukshan Fernando also attended.

Greens councillor Dr Josh Fergeus, who has been a vocal supporter of LGBTQ rights and next month’s drag event, said he had been swamped with hundreds of messages and calls voicing “misguided concern” and “credible threats of violence” in the past four weeks. Much of the correspondence is not from local constituents, he said.

“I’ve been on council for almost seven years now and I am seeing the frequency and intensity of these occurrences is increasing,” he said.

Fergeus was confident the drag event could be held safely and he said it was important it went ahead to not “reward poor behaviour”.

“People throwing their weight around making threats of violence and trying to intimidate people shouldn’t be the things which inform our decision-making. It should be made based on what’s best for the community, including vulnerable or marginalised [people],” he said.

Dr Sean Mulcahy, co-lead of the Victorian Pride Lobby’s rainbow local government campaign, attended the meeting with a group from the LGBTQ community.

He said there was a great deal of nervousness about passing protesters at the entrance and asking a question to the council, and some had pulled out last minute.

“We’re not there to engage in a fight, we want to show the council that the community has their back on this important work,” Mulcahy said.

Mulcahy said cancelling drag events sent a negative message.

“We want to know that we have the level of government that is closest to the community by our side and supporting us,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/protesters-descend-on-council-meeting-to-oppose-drag-queen-event-20230426-p5d3bo.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18766026

File: 58b170889af0c6f⋯.jpg (86.53 KB,1280x720,16:9,Barrister_Clive_Steirn_SC.jpg)

>>18676743

Barrister Clive Steirn won’t have a bar of Indigenous voice to parliament support

ELLIE DUDLEY and JANET ALBRECHTSEN - APRIL 28, 2023

A barrister has fired criticism at the NSW Bar Association for issuing its public support for the proposed Indigenous voice model and lambasted the Bar president for speaking on behalf of members without consultation, claiming the voice could open the floodgates to High Court challenges.

Clive Steirn SC has joined barrister Louise Clegg in lashing the Bar council for essentially claiming it has a mandate from its members to support the voice in the absence of debate. In an email to Bar president Gabrielle Bashir on April 18, obtained by The Australian, Mr Steirn outlined his key concerns, namely that he did not believe the voice had any relevance to the Bar’s charter to provide advice on “‘specific legal policy and practice issues as they arise’ directly affecting barristers”.

He referenced Ms Bashir’s opinion piece in The Sydney Morning Herald a week earlier in which she wrote that the NSW Bar supported the “second limb” of Anthony Albanese’s voice proposal, which empowers the Indigenous body to make represen­tations to executive government.

He questioned whether Ms Bashir had sought legal advice from appropriate parties before claiming that the prospect of legal challenges arising from this controversial limb was “low risk.”

“Embedding such a provision in the Constitution could lead to unintended consequences, starting with endless High Court applications by the voice where the government of the day does not accept its advice,” he wrote.

“Did the Bar council obtain its own independent legal advice as to the constitutional implications in relation to possible challenges by the voice to the High Court before it committed itself to unanimously supporting the second limb?” he asked.

“If not, what prevented the Bar council from doing so, given its significance and importance to all members as reflected in your letter to The Sydney Morning Herald? If such an advice was obtained, I respectfully request that the advice be made available to all Bar Association members?

“It is assumed that legal professional privilege would be waived in these circumstances, given it is in the interest of all … members to remain informed.”

Ms Bashir ignored Mr Steirn’s request to view any legal advice provided to the Bar: “We have expert committees that specifically look to and advise on law reform daily. This includes in relation to national laws and we also work with and are a constituent body on the Law Council of Australia.”

“I understand your views as to the second limb and those of others who do not support the second limb, however as you are aware from my article and president’s message, having considered alternative proposals, including as to deletion or alteration of this limb, the Bar council unanimously resolved against that position,” she wrote in response to the email.

“The process was thorough and we had all the available competing positions before us in the meeting, including the Leeser model which was announced that day and considered all of them and arguments for and against.”

Ms Clegg, the wife of opposition Treasury spokesman Angus Taylor, has exchanged numerous emails with Ms Bashir airing her concerns for the proposed constitutional amendments. She said the credibility of the NSW Bar Association was “in tatters”.

“This is a proposed change to the Constitution. It is the most radical and far reaching proposed since Federation. Indeed it is the most radical ever imagined by any comparable liberal democracy,” she told The Weekend Australian.

“Yet the NSW Bar Association is exposed as complicit in shutting down alternative views.”

In Victoria, the 21-member state Bar council met on Thursday to discuss whether the association would follow the lead of NSW and issue a public statement supporting the Indigenous voice to parliament. The meeting went for about four hours with no decision taken.

It is now expected a decision will be made at the council’s next meeting on May 9.

In the meantime, a motion for a special general meeting for all 2200 members to vote on whether the association should give a public statement of the voice at all has been circulating.

The motion requires 40 signatures to go forth, and is expected to receive those before the council’s upcoming meeting.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/barrister-clive-steirn-wont-have-a-bar-of-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-support/news-story/bfce421df3e4bcf0530764cd03ffb155

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18766047

File: f1abb05d1328b7b⋯.jpg (481.53 KB,2989x2432,2989:2432,Bruce_Lehrmann_sought_perm….jpg)

File: 2a398fa1c765ddf⋯.jpg (849.14 KB,4240x2832,265:177,Brittany_Higgins_arriving_….jpg)

Bruce Lehrmann given go-ahead by Federal Court to sue journalists and media outlets over Brittany Higgins interviews

Elizabeth Byrne and Markus Mannheim - 28 April 2023

1/2

The Federal Court has given the go-ahead to former Liberal Party adviser Bruce Lehrmann's plan to sue media outlets over interviews they conducted with Brittany Higgins.

In the interviews — which Mr Lehrmann argues identified him — Ms Higgins alleged she was raped in a parliamentary office in 2019.

Mr Lehrmann had to ask the court for permission to lodge a defamation claim against Network Ten and News Life Media because the usual 12-month deadline for these claims had expired. Their stories about Ms Higgins aired and were published in February 2021.

He also filed a separate claim against the ABC, which broadcast a speech Ms Higgins gave to the National Press Club in February 2022.

He told the Federal Court his lawyer had advised him he could not begin civil action until his criminal matters were resolved.

Mr Lehrmann underwent a criminal trial last year over the alleged rape of Ms Higgins, though the trial was eventually abandoned due to juror misconduct.

He has always maintained his innocence and there have been no findings against him.

Lehrmann says he was advised not to sue until criminal trial finished

During his criminal trial, Mr Lehrmann maintained his right to silence.

But he was called to give evidence in the Federal Court last month, when he argued he should be allowed extra time to lodge his defamation application.

That hearing examined text messages between him, his then girlfriend and other friends, mostly on the night Ms Higgins's interviews went public in 2021.

Ms Higgins did not name Mr Lehrmann in the interviews, when she described being sexually assaulted on a couch in the office of then federal minister Linda Reynolds, but Mr Lehrmann said he was easily identifiable as the alleged rapist.

The story was initially published by Samantha Maiden on news.com.au, and the interview with Lisa Wilkinson aired on the same evening on The Project.

Mr Lehrmann has accused the journalists and their employers of being recklessly indifferent to the truth or falsity of the rape claims.

He told the Federal Court he had watched The Project interview with his lawyer in his office that night.

He said he asked about defamation proceedings at the time but was advised that any criminal matters would need to be resolved first.

Mr Lehrmann's lawyers told the Federal Court last month that, because of the criminal matter, it would not have been reasonable for him to file a defamation case in 2021.

They also raised concerns about his health and the stress of the ongoing public scrutiny on him.

The court heard that, until it became clear late last year that there was to be no criminal retrial, it was not reasonable for Mr Lehrmann to commence defamation proceedings.

"In the circumstances of this case, it is submitted, it is just and reasonable to extend the limitation period to the date on which Mr Lehrmann ultimately commenced proceedings," his lawyers said.

"He acted promptly after the announcement on December 2, 2022 that the prosecution would be discontinued and could not realistically have commenced proceedings any sooner after the end of the criminal proceedings against him."

Mr Lehrmann's surprise appearance in the hearing last month was followed by an agreement to have his lawyer give evidence in a follow-up hearing, to corroborate his story about the advice he gave.

That plan was ultimately abandoned.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18766049

File: f3226d5fca07298⋯.jpg (242.91 KB,1440x1440,1:1,Lisa_Wilkinson_s_interview….jpg)

File: 426dae97abc477e⋯.jpg (660.44 KB,2016x1512,4:3,Mr_Lehrmann_leaves_the_ACT….jpg)

>>18766047

2/2

Media argue Lehrmann had enough time to file claim

Lawyers for Network Ten, News Life Media and Maiden urged the court to reject Mr Lehrmann's account of his legal advice, given it was not corroborated.

In their submissions, they said the only record of what was said came from Mr Lehrmann's text messages to his then girlfriend and other friends, which included comments like "I won't be going to prison and I have two lined up for civil", and to his girlfriend about his advice from his lawyer: "If I am named tonight then he says I'm up for millions as defamation."

In other messages, he wrote: "I've got criminal and a defamation."

The media lawyers' submission said: "Those messages entirely contradict [Mr] Lehrmann's evidence-in-chief."

The lawyers told the court the messages should be fatal to Mr Lehrmann's request for an extension of time, because they suggested he was given the opposite advice.

Mr Lehrmann was challenged about the messages under cross-examination, when he said they were not a true reflection of the advice he received, as he was trying to put the best light on the stressful situation, particularly to placate his girlfriend.

The media lawyers also suggested Mr Lehrmann's reliance on his stress from media attention and psychiatric treatment was overstated.

"His admission to the hospital occurred after, the previous evening, he had gotten intoxicated in [his lawyer's] office and sent a raft of messages seeking to source 'bags' of 'gear' in order to 'get lit'," the lawyers said.

"… save for a brief hospital admission between February 16-18, 2021, and a voluntary admission to the Northside Clinic until March 2, 2021 (a period of 12 days) there is no evidence before the court that Lehrmann's mental health was so deleteriously affected in the days, weeks and months following the publication of the matters complained of that it was not reasonable for him to commence defamation proceedings within the limitation period."

Wilkinson was represented separately by defamation lawyer Sue Chrysanthou, who pointed out Mr Lehrmann had admitted he intended to sue Wilkinson from the start but took two years to lodge his claim.

Ms Chrysanthou also pointed out Mr Lehrmann's criminal charge was not laid for some time after publication.

"Many of these proceedings are reasonably commenced, due to their seriousness, shortly after publication," she said in her submission, adding this was usual in the face of possible criminal charges.

Judge finds it was reasonable to delay defamation application

Today, Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said he considered all circumstances that contributed to Mr Lehrmann waiting 20 months before contacting a defamation lawyer.

The judge said it was unreasonable for Mr Lehrmann to lodge his claim within a year, given he had received "express" and "repeated" advice — albeit from a criminal lawyer — not to do so.

"Mr Lehrmann's actions reflect the fact that his real priority, even before prosecution, was the criminal allegations and, in recognising this priority, he engaged and then listened to a specialist criminal defence solicitor recommended by a trusted friend," Justice Lee said.

The "advice to defer fighting on two fronts was unsurprising", the judge noted.

"The full court … has observed that where a person is facing a criminal charge, and the impugned matter raises questions about the person's guilt or innocence, the 'ordinary' position is that it will not be reasonable to commence defamation proceedings."

Justice Lee said the defamation trial should begin as quickly as possible.

He also said he saw no reason why Mr Lehrmann's additional claim against the ABC could not be heard at the same time.

The trial will begin on November 20 and is expected to take four weeks.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-28/bruce-lehrmann-allowed-to-sue-journalists-media-outlets/102269362

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18766061

File: 3ad03be96e257ef⋯.jpg (83.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>18708667

Heat on ACT DPP Shane Drumgold over Bruce Lehrmann rape trial conduct

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - APRIL 28, 2023

1/2

Pressure is mounting on ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold over his handling of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial, with the terms of reference of the ­Sofronoff inquiry widened to ­include his conduct in the preparation of the proceedings and in the hearings.

The official inquiry into the case, chaired by Walter Sofronoff KC, was already tasked with examining whether Mr Drumgold, the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions, breached his ­duties in deciding to commence, continue and then discontinue criminal proceedings against Mr Lehrmann over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins and, if so, the reasons and motives for his ­actions.

The change to the terms of reference was authorised by ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr and ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury on Friday.

The original terms of reference contained a power to investigate “any matter reasonably incidental to any of the above matters”, but it is understood ­information now before the ­inquiry was regarded as so serious that a specific reference was required.

The inquiry is also tasked with examining the conduct of police and the ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner, but those terms of reference have not changed.

Mr Sofronoff has been given a month’s extension so he will now deliver his report by July 31, following delays in the production of thousands of documents.

Submissions to the inquiry have not yet been released but The Weerkend Australian ­understands there are several new lines of inquiry regarding Mr Drumgold’s conduct in the hearings.

A key witness in the trial ­accused Mr Drumgold of threatening and ­intimidating her as she left the witness box on a morning tea break, and of ignoring her pleas to be ­recalled to the stand to refute what she alleged was “blatantly false and misleading” evidence by Ms Higgins.

Former Liberal staffer Fiona Brown said Mr Drumgold and an associate berated her for providing “inadmissable evidence” and that the DPP then tried to use her mental health to discredit her as a witness. In a formal complaint to the ACT Bar Association, Ms Brown also alleged that, prior to the trial, Mr Drumgold was so dismissive of her concerns about the potential ­impact of the upcoming Logies – where TV presenter Lisa Wilkinson’s interview with Ms Higgins was up for an award – that it caused her to break down emotionally during a conference with him.

During the trial in the ACT ­Supreme Court last year, Ms Higgins gave evidence that she felt pressured by her chief of staff, Ms Brown, and her boss, Liberal minister Linda Reynolds, not to pursue the alleged assault, in the context of a looming federal election. Ms Brown strongly denied in evidence that she had been ­anything but supportive of Ms Higgins, saying she and Senator Reynolds had told Ms Higgins she was within her rights to make a police complaint and would be fully ­supported.

But in a complaint lodged with the ACT Bar Association, Ms Brown said that during a morning tea break “Mr Drumgold and his associate approached me and ­berated me, stating that I was coming close to providing inadmissable evidence because of the way I was answering the questions”. “I felt threatened and intimidated,” Ms Brown said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18766063

File: 9893dcc449ee7f9⋯.jpg (95.14 KB,768x1024,3:4,Bruce_Lehrmann.jpg)

>>18766061

2/2

Another area of inquiry for Mr Sofronoff is expected to involve dispute about a conversation ­between Mr Drumgold and Wilkinson prior to the Logies. It is understood Wilkinson denies being “expressly warned” by Mr Drumgold about giving the ­Logies speech.

In a letter to ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum, Channel 10 boss Beverly McGarvey said “neither Ms Wilkinson nor the Network Ten senior legal counsel present at the conference with the DPP on June 15 2022 understood that they had been cautioned that Ms Wilkinson giving an acceptance speech at the Logie awards could result in an application being made to the court to vacate the trial date”. “Had they understood that a specific warning had been given, Ms Wilkinson would not have given that speech,” she said.

Chief Justice McCallum was forced to delay the trial for several months following the speech and the media coverage that followed, noting that she did so “with ­gritted teeth”.

A further matter likely to be examined by the inquiry surrounds Mr Drumgold’s attack on Senator Reynolds, who was ­accused in court of “coaching” Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers.

Giving evidence, Senator Reynolds confirmed she texted defence lawyer Steve Whybrow seeking transcripts of Ms Higgins’ evidence on October 6.

Mr Drumgold used the text to suggest a political influence in Senator Reynolds’ conduct. “You are clearly politically invested in the outcome of this trial,’’ Mr Drumgold said. Mr Drumgold also put it to Senator Reynolds she ­offered suggestions for the cross examination.

The inquiry is also expected to look at disparaging remarks Mr Drumgold made about the police investigators during the trial, including that “the skill sets of those police officers was not high”.

Mr Lehrmann has at all times denied the allegations against him.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/heat-on-act-dpp-shane-drumgold-over-bruce-lehrmann-rape-trial-conduct/news-story/8d2afa0cc439bbdffd529e723ed29450

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18766087

File: 85a507235bdcc87⋯.jpg (90.54 KB,768x768,1:1,Keith_Hartley_another_Aust….jpg)

File: fd9285551899a92⋯.jpg (138.05 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Keith_Hartley_another_Aust….jpg)

>>18524065 (pb)

Challenge to AFP raid over Chinese pilot training fails

AAP - April 28, 2023

A former fighter pilot suspected of helping train Chinese People's Liberation Army pilots has failed in a court challenge to the validity of an Australian Federal Police raid on his home.

The AFP executed a search warrant and seized items from the home of Keith Hartley, chief operating officer of the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), in November.

The warrant said Hartley was suspected of breaking commonwealth law by organising and facilitating training to PLA pilots "in regard to military aircraft platforms and military doctrine, tactics and strategy".

Mr Hartley sought a Federal Court order quashing the warrant, declaring it invalid and restraining the AFP from using any material seized.

He has denied any criminal offence, and his lawyers argued in court that the the warrant was ambiguous and misstated the alleged offence.

But in a judgment delivered in Sydney on Friday, Justice Wendy Abraham said Mr Hartley had not established the warrant was invalid.

The sole ground of the invalidity claim was the allegation that the warrant did not sufficiently state an offence.

"It states conduct capable of constituting an offence, and it does so with a reasonable degree of precision," she said, in dismissing his application.

Mr Hartley's South Australian address was redacted from the judgment.

The judgment was delivered hours after the family of another ex-fighter pilot Daniel Duggan, who is facing extradition over accusations he trained Chinese military pilots, protested outside the United States embassy in Canberra.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8176258/challenge-to-afp-raid-over-chinese-pilot-training-fails/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18766108

File: 85903c25ffafbf4⋯.jpg (205.81 KB,1400x840,5:3,Saffrine_Duggan_the_wife_o….jpg)

>>18729172

Daniel Duggan’s family protest outside US embassy in Canberra

Ben Doherty - 28 April 2023

The wife of imprisoned Australian Daniel Duggan – the former US marine pilot wanted for extradition by America – has led a protest outside the US embassy in Canberra demanding her husband be released and his extradition abandoned.

Here’s what Saffrine Duggan told protesters on Friday morning:

"I am determined to fight this terrible injustice, and to demand that Australian sovereignty is respected.

Today Dan has been gone for 191 days – without any Australian charges, convictions, or history of violence – on the say-so of the United States government.

Dan should be immediately released from maximum security isolation in the NSW prison system, where he has already languished for six months with no Australian charges or convictions, before he, his six Australian children and me, are traumatised any further."

Duggan, a former US marine pilot now a naturalised Australian, was arrested last October at the request of the US government, which is seeking his extradition on charges of arms trafficking and money laundering more than a decade ago.

Duggan, 54, denies the charges and is fighting his extradition from prison, a process that could take months, even years to resolve.

Duggan’s six children also attended the demonstration outside the US embassy in Canberra, bearing signs and banner declaring the protest was ‘for family, freedom, justice and Australian sovereignty’.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2023/apr/28/australia-live-news-national-cabinet-defence-albanese-sydney-melbourne-brisbane-politics-budget-labor-coalition-covid-gambling-health-migration?page=with:block-644b55998f085dab34be3acc#block-644b55998f085dab34be3acc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18766129

File: 9f0bed5e5604127⋯.jpg (378.38 KB,1400x840,5:3,The_family_of_detained_Dan….jpg)

>>18729172

>>18766108

Daniel Duggan’s case to return to court on Monday

Ben Doherty - 28 April 2023

Earlier we updated you on Daniel Duggan’s family protesting his extradition order outside the US embassy in Canberra. His case will return to court on Monday morning.

His lawyers have argued the request for Duggan’s extradition is politically motivated – catalysed by the US’s deepening geopolitical contest with China – and invalid under Australia’s extradition treaty with the US.

The US alleges Duggan, a former US citizen now a naturalised Australian, trained Chinese fighter pilots to land fighter jets on aircraft carriers, in defiance of arms trafficking laws, and engaged in a conspiracy to launder money. Those claims have not been tested in court.

Duggan strenuously rejects all charges against him as being politically motivated, and the indictment full of “half-truths, falsehoods and gross embellishments”.

Duggan’s lawyer, Dennis Miralis, has written to the attorney general insisting Duggan’s extradition be abandoned, or at least paused, while the inspector general’s investigation is ongoing:

"The United States should withdraw its extradition until the inquiry is concluded.

If the United States declines to withdraw, we will be left with no choice but to make an application to the court for a temporary stay of the extradition proceedings in order to protect the integrity and independence of the IGIS and Dan’s fundamental rights to a fair trial.

In our view, it would amount to an abuse of process for the US to proceed with the extradition whilst the IGIS inquiry is under way."

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2023/apr/28/australia-live-news-national-cabinet-defence-albanese-sydney-melbourne-brisbane-politics-budget-labor-coalition-covid-gambling-health-migration?page=with:block-644b57708f085dab34be3aeb#block-644b57708f085dab34be3aeb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18770882

File: 5437432ce885b60⋯.jpg (320.1 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Indigenous_leader_Noel_Pea….jpg)

File: 6187d06ae2f0e55⋯.jpg (1.35 MB,4346x2900,2173:1450,Malcolm_Turnbull_Scott_Mor….jpg)

>>18676743

Pearson slams ‘weak’ Dutton, former Liberal PMs on Indigenous recognition

Paul Sakkal - April 29, 2023

Voice architect Noel Pearson has delivered a stinging condemnation of contemporary Coalition leaders, accusing them of being too weak to embrace the task of changing the Constitution to acknowledge Indigenous Australians.

In a speech to the Labor-aligned John Curtin Research Centre on Thursday night, the Indigenous leader insisted the Voice referendum was on track to win despite months of divisive debate, and urged Australians to take personal responsibility for the push for reconciliation.

The public intellectual – criticised lately by the Coalition and No campaigners for personal attacks on Voice opponents – blamed former prime ministers Tony Abbott, Malcolm Turnbull and Scott Morrison for the lack of action on reconciliation.

These leaders had displayed their “inability or their cowardice” in failing to use their political authority to convince their MPs of the need for constitutional recognition, Pearson said.

“Abbott wanted to do this, but he couldn’t. Turnbull wanted to do this, but he couldn’t. Morrison wanted to do this, but he couldn’t,” he said. Abbott, who signalled his intention to hold a referendum shortly before he was toppled as prime minister, Turnbull and Morrison were each contacted for comment.

Lamenting what he claimed were lies stemming from the No campaign, Pearson said Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who is campaigning against the Voice, was defined by his right-leaning party room.

“He’s too weak to have shifted them and shown the necessary leadership to move his party out of the rut that it’s in,” Pearson said. Dutton’s office was also contacted for comment.

The comments from Pearson underscored his break from conservatives, after decades of negotiating with conservative leaders on constitutional reform.

Pearson explained that he, Liberal MP Julian Leeser – whom he said history would view as one of the Voice’s key authors – as well as Professor Anne Twomey, jurist Greg Craven and a small group of others developed the Voice concept to win over the conservatives who now oppose elements of it.

It was formulated as a more palatable alternative to an earlier idea, formed early last decade, to enshrine a right to non-discrimination, which critics feared would lead to judicial activism in the High Court.

Pearson praised former prime minister John Howard for committing to minimalist constitutional recognition before the 2007 election.

But he said it was not until Anthony Albanese’s election last year that a leader fully embraced the push for reconciliation.

Pearson argued the backlash against the Voice’s ability to advise the executive branch of government, which has become one of the No campaign’s chief critiques, was fuelled largely by an opinion piece by former High Court justice Ian Callinan.

“This was entirely concocted by Callinan himself and those who ran with the argument,” Pearson said.

Legal concerns about the Voice have been dismissed by an eminent group of former judges and constitutional experts. However, a smaller group of legal figures maintain there is at least a non-zero risk that High Court litigation could ensue and that the government may be forced to consult the Voice on some policy matters, potentially delaying the work of government.

Pearson cast the sceptics’ thinking as baseless and said that “truculent lies being generated by the No campaign” – including Dutton’s description of a “Canberra Voice” – combined to form a big barrier to success at the referendum.

“We want a Voice from the community to them … Peter Dutton is the Canberra Voice,” he said.

The Cape York Institute founder said, at its core, the Voice was about giving a stake in the nation’s future to a marginalised minority group that had a unique place in Australia’s history as its first inhabitants.

“With the headwinds and the fractiousness of the No campaign and the sheer difficulties we’re having in the media, it’s just extraordinary the uphill battle,” Pearson said.

“Noel and Marcia [Langton, an Indigenous professor] represent 3 per cent of the population. It’s you guys who speak for the 97 per cent, this is your country and this is the future of your children, and so I’m urging everyone to take responsibility for their country because getting this right is not just about getting it right for the black fellas, it’s about getting this right for the country.

“Let’s bring this home in October.”

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/pearson-slams-weak-dutton-former-liberal-pms-on-indigenous-recognition-20230428-p5d3yp.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18770941

File: 5d20f381ed39762⋯.jpg (119.08 KB,1024x769,1024:769,Maureen_Huebel_right_plans….jpg)

File: 56c4e2d3e717fbe⋯.jpg (126.09 KB,1024x768,4:3,Kashgar_in_China_s_western….jpg)

File: 68d1e330ce8b5fa⋯.jpg (171.92 KB,825x390,55:26,MAH_1.jpg)

‘I’m not a bot’: Melbourne scholar behind pro-Beijing Twitter account plans to ‘debunk’ Xinjiang claims

To many, Maureen A Huebel almost doesn’t seem like a real person. But after sparking outrage with a viral post, the 75-year-old insists “I’m not a bot”.

Frank Chung - March 9, 2023

1/2

EXCLUSIVE

To many online, Maureen A Huebel almost doesn’t seem like a real person.

The vociferously anti-American Twitter account posts a constant stream of pro-China — and more recently, pro-Russia — messages to her 3000 followers, with an unusual focus on debunking claims of Uyghur repression in Xinjiang.

In one viral tweet over the weekend that sparked particular backlash, Mrs Huebel — whose bio lists a series of academic qualifications from universities including Monash — claimed she was planning to travel to the troubled northwestern region to study the “happiness” of the local population.

“I am travelling to Xinjiang in 2024 to study how the Uighurs have contributed to the substantial growth in the Xinjiang GDP and look at their population growth,” she wrote, adding, “Analyse their happiness and expression through dancing.”

Author Idrees Ahmad, associate editor of New Lines Magazine, replied, “You are a cheap propagandist. And it would be useless to say that you should be ashamed of yourself since you clearly have no shame.”

At times almost comically pro-Beijing — regularly retweeting Chinese Communist Party officials while decrying American “propaganda” about everything from the Ukraine war to Taiwan — Mrs Huebel has in the past been accused of being an elaborate fake account, part of China’s sophisticated online influence operations.

“I’m very much a real person — I’m not a bot,” the 75-year-old said in a phone interview on Tuesday from her home in the affluent beachside Melbourne suburb of Brighton. “I’m bona fide and a lot of people don’t like it that I’m bona fide. I’ve got a lot of qualifications, they’re all real.”

Mrs Huebel, a mother-of-four who said she is not retired but has “passive income so really I can do what I like”, denied being a “propagandist” for Beijing. “Everyone’s a propagandist — everyone’s got their propaganda in their own self-interest,” she said.

“I don’t care. I would have died a long time ago if I got upset because someone called me a Chinese bot on Twitter. We have a lot of anti-China propaganda that’s not true and it doesn’t serve us. It might serve the oligarchs, it might serve the military-industrial complex and their profits.”

Mrs Huebel says she is friends with Jerry Grey, a British-born Australian retiree living in China who emerged as a star in state propaganda several years ago after bicycling through Xinjiang, where he claimed he saw no evidence of any camps.

Mr Grey, who has more than 80,000 followers on Twitter — which is banned in China — told news.com.au in 2020 that “if anyone thinks I am telling a lie, please come over here and show me what it is that you see”.

Mrs Huebel flatly denies being paid by or having any relationship with the Chinese government, and says she intends to take a tour of the region with Mr Grey — without any involvement of CCP officials.

“I talk to a lot of Chinese officials, I know a lot of Chinese officials, but I will not have them plan my trip, I do not want them to plan my trip,” she said. “I talk to Chinese people and I have Chinese friends, and some of those people on Twitter are in the CPC.”

She said she talked to them “because they give me intelligence, they teach me about their government — because we need to learn about their government”.

“I don’t get any money from them, and what’s more I would love the Australian government to finance my research through a legitimate institution like ANU or Melbourne University, but they won’t,” she said.

“But I don’t need to be funded. If I was to accept money from China I would immediately be tainted. I have to keep my academic independence.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18770955

File: 7fec426b4f8620a⋯.jpg (166.59 KB,1024x768,4:3,China_has_been_accused_of_….jpg)

File: cf05de8a528c72e⋯.jpg (105.11 KB,1024x768,4:3,Detainees_at_Tekes_County_….jpg)

>>18770941

2/2

According to Mrs Huebel, she had been in discussions with the ANU’s Centre on China in the World about conducting research, before its director Jane Golley sparked a firestorm in 2021 after claiming at a National Press Club event that she had read a “convincing” but anonymous paper that “debunks” claims of human rights abuses against Uyghurs.

Professor Golley later apologised and stepped down from the role, writing in The Australian that “at no point have I denied that human rights abuses are occurring in Xinjiang, on a scale that is horrifying”.

Mrs Huebel says she intends to approach Melbourne University “to publish my Xinjiang postgraduate material”, which will focus on “poverty alleviation” but “by the mere fact of doing it and as a side product will debunk Zenz”.

Adrian Zenz is the German researcher behind the influential 2018 report that laid out the alleged size and scope of the Xinjiang internment camps.

Now with the US government-funded Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation think tank in Washington DC, Mr Zenz was the first to estimate Beijing may have detained up to one million Uyghur Muslims in brutal “re-education camps”, where international observers have alleged widespread human rights abuses including torture and forced sterilisation.

Mr Zenz personally took aim at Mrs Huebel in 2021 after she questioned his methodology, accusing her of being a fake account.

“Whoever this person — who uncritically shares state propaganda on Xinjiang — is or pretends to be, her Twitter profile is entirely misleading as she has no actual affiliation with the named academic institutions. Nothing,” he wrote.

In response, her husband Robert Huebel threatened to take legal action, after posting a lengthy thread of photos documenting his wife’s academic records and publications.

Mrs Huebel said after the exchange with Mr Zenz her Twitter account was taken down for “impersonation”, and was only restored after Monash University wrote to the social media platform at her request to confirm she had done research there. (Monash University has been contacted for comment.)

Asked why she appears to have such strong feelings about China, Mrs Huebel said she was not “only China-focused, I would say I’m interested in geopolitics in general”.

“Why China? China’s the rising power,” she said. “America’s rotting on the inside. The standard of living in America is dropping as the average standard of living in China is growing.”

She said she did think there were “some people that have been treated badly in Xinjiang” because “they had terrible terrorism there and there was a clampdown”. “I believe there were some innocent people in the clampdown with real grievances,” she said.

“I do see faults in China. It’s not perfect, it has a lot of problems, but overall its economy is growing, its GDP is growing, its standard of living is growing. There’s miraculous poverty elimination. I want to talk to the cadres, how do you do it.”

In August, a long-awaited United Nations report alleged China may have carried out “crimes against humanity” against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang but stopped short of calling it “genocide” — a term used since January 2021 by the United States and since embraced by a number of other Western nations.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the report was “pretty harrowing” and had confirmed Australia’s long-held fears about “serious human rights violations” in the region.

China immediately denounced the report as “lies and disinformation”, saying the UN “wantonly smears and slanders China, and interferes in China’s internal affairs” and releasing its own 122-page document detailing the “extremism” threat of the Uyghur people and the “counter-terror” operations against them.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/im-not-a-bot-melbourne-scholar-behind-probeijing-twitter-account-plans-to-debunk-xinjiang-claims/news-story/b99b0cf4ede9709283dd3e564ef42f5d

https://twitter.com/MaureenAHuebel/status/1631813333719601154

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18770981

File: 239a966e5b91ecb⋯.jpg (73.58 KB,1200x720,5:3,Chinese_academic_centers_w….jpg)

>>18770941

Chinese academic centers welcome Australian scholar who has come under attack after announcing plans to visit Xinjiang

Liu Xin - Apr 28, 2023

Two academic centers in China on Friday expressed a warm welcome to Maureen A Huebel, an Australian scholar, who has been under attack from anti-China forces after announcing her plan to visit China's Xinjiang region in 2024, saying they are willing to work with the Australian scholar and assist her in conducting research in the region.

Since Huebel announced on Twitter in March that she was planning to go to Xinjiang in 2024 to research poverty alleviation, she has been hounded by trolls and disturbed by people who insulted her on Twitter, and sometimes even received death threats.

For a long time, China's Xinjiang region has been demonized by outside forces, which have also affected reports and academic research on the region and fooled the international community. Ms Huebel has faced cyber bulling and attacks for merely expressing her willingness to know the truth and to conduct research in the region. She is not the only one who had similar experience, according to a release from the Institute of China's Borderland Studies at Zhejiang Normal University.

We have noticed Ms Huebel's research plan to go to the Xinjiang region and as an academic institute which has studied the region for a long time, the Institute of China's Borderland Studies at Zhejiang Normal University, is willing to offer assistance. "On the journey of exploring and researching Xinjiang, you never walk alone," read the notice of the institute.

The Institute for Communication and Borderland Governance of Guangzhou-based Jinan University also commented on Huebel's experience.

Out of political needs and ideological bias, some Western countries have hyped topics on China's Xinjiang region, including making allegations of "genocide" or "forced labor." While some anti-China media and politicians are spreading disinformation, the voice for justice from Chinese scholars has been suppressed, read the release from the Guangzhou-based institute.

"We have empathy for Ms Huebel for similar experiences," said institute, expressing willingness to contact Ms Huebel and to accompany her to the region to assist with her academic research.

In an article Huebel wrote to the Global Times in March, she said that she first became seriously interested in studying China when she noticed rising levels of Australian poverty and homelessness. Xinjiang was identified as among the fastest GDP growth of all Chinese provinces and regions.

"I wanted to learn more as I couldn't reconcile the fact that there was a 'genocide' in Xinjiang with evidence that there was a growing population and no refugees," said Huebel.

However, when she joined Twitter to conduct preliminary research, she came under fierce attack. She contacted Adrian Zenz, a notorious anti-China "scholar" and asked him for field research notes and methodology and published peer-reviewed journals, only to find herself blocked, Huebel said.

Together with other Americans, Zenz had Huebel indefinitely suspended from Twitter. Huebel said she had to ask Monash University to write to Twitter to state that she was formally associated with the University. Twitter then reinstated her.

"The more opposition I got, the more determined I became to forge a path to complete my project. I was blocking trolls that did not contribute to the research, sometimes 10 at a time, who ganged up on me, to what is called a Twitter pile-on," Huebel wrote.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202304/1289964.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18770996

File: 6a175f2c9faaca9⋯.jpg (102.03 KB,1080x607,1080:607,Maureen_Huebel_R_plans_to_….jpg)

File: d5130c6a87aa199⋯.jpg (38.26 KB,482x319,482:319,A_screenshot_of_Maureen_Hu….jpg)

>>18770941

Attacks won't scare me off from Xinjiang research: Australian scholar

Ma Chi - 2023-04-28

Maureen Huebel, a Melbourne-based scholar who has been the target of online harassment for debunking Western mainstream narratives about the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, said she would not back down in her research.

"The more opposition I got, the more determined I became to complete my project," Huebel said in article published on Global Times.

Huebel joined Twitter to do preliminary research on Xinjiang, but she did not expect the outrage she would receive.

One post that has sparked particular backlash was published on March 4.

"I am travelling to Xinjiang in 2024 to study how the Uygurs have contributed to the substantial growth in the Xinjiang GDP and look at their population growth," she wrote, adding "Analyse their happiness and expression through dancing."

Since announcing her plans, Huebel had been hounded by trolls, with some even sending her death threats. Some accused her of being a "sophisticated Chinese bot".

After she started research on Xinjiang, Huebel contacted Adrian Zenz, a German scholar who conducted widely cited studies about Xinjiang that have fueled claims of "genocide", "forced labor" and "human rights abuses." Huebel questioned Zenz's methodology and asked him for field research notes and published peer-reviewed journals.

Zenz took offense to it, and accused Huebel of being a fake account. As a result, Huebel's Twitter account was suspended for "impersonation".

Huebel had to ask Monash University, where she has done postgraduate studies, to write to Twitter to state she had done research there. Twitter then reinstated her account.

Huebel's husband Robert also posted a lengthy thread of photos documenting his wife's academic records and publications.

"I'm very a real person - I'm not a bot," the 75-year-old told news.com.au, an Australian news website. "I'm bona fide and a lot of people don't like it. I've got a lot of qualifications, they're all real."

Huebel said she first became interested in studying China when she noticed growing homelessness and poverty in Australia while her friends in China were enjoying a higher standard of living, according to the article she wrote for Global Times.

Believing poverty alleviation is critical for any economy to improve, Huebel said the most outstanding GDP growth in Chinese provinces has been Xinjiang. She wanted to learn more as she could not "reconcile the fact that there was a 'genocide' in Xinjiang with the evidence there was a growing population and no refugees".

Huebel decided to visit Xinjiang, and explore what lessons could be applied in Australia.

The scholar also said that in today's Western media environment where China is always portrayed as a "bad guy", it is hard to be a critical thinker.

"The mainstream media in the West is taken to be accurate, with few questioning its narratives," Huebel said.

She added that mainstream media is highly concentrated and focused on promoting its political interests, and its influence is significant in shaping the opinions of average Australians.

Her treatment on Twitter, she said, is a result of Australia experiencing pressure from the US in every aspect, and growing US fears that China's growth trajectory is set to overtake the US economy.

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202304/28/WS644b994aa310b6054fad06bf.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18771047

File: 6a175f2c9faaca9⋯.jpg (102.03 KB,1080x607,1080:607,Maureen_Huebel_R_plans_to_….jpg)

>>18770941

Melbourne scholar smeared as 'bot' as she tries to debunk false Xinjiang claims

CGTN - 2023-04-28

1/2

A Melbourne scholar was accused of being an elaborate fake account after she posted a series of pro-China messages to her over 3,000 followers. Some of her posts are focused on debunking claims of the "Xinjiang Uygur genocide," a false narrative that has been repeated by Western politicians and media outlets for years out of political reasons.

Twitter backlash

One viral tweet that sparked particular backlash is that Maureen Huebel claimed she was planning to travel to northwest China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region to study the "happiness" of the local population.

"I am travelling to Xinjiang in 2024 to study how the Uygurs have contributed to the substantial growth in the Xinjiang GDP and look at their population growth," she wrote, adding, "Analyze their happiness and expression through dancing."

Since the 2024 research announcement, loads of people have begun ganging up on her on Twitter, some even sending her death threats. Many have accused her of being a pro-China propaganda "bot."

Facing the Twitter pile-on, the 75-year-old decided to contact Adrian Zenz, who conducted the original research on Xinjiang and made the claims of "genocide," "forced labor" and "human rights abuses." Huebel questioned his methodology, asked him for his field research notes and published peer-reviewed journals.

Zenz strangely took offense to this, accused her of being a fake account and had Huebel indefinitely suspended from Twitter. To get her account back, Huebel asked Monash University to write to the social media platform to confirm she had done research there. Twitter then restored her account.

Huebel's husband Robert Huebel also posted a lengthy thread of photos documenting his wife's academic records and publications to defend his wife.

"I'm very much a real person. I'm not a bot," she told an Australian news website. "I'm bona fide and a lot of people don't like it that I'm bona fide. I've got a lot of qualifications, they're all real."

First impressions about China

Huebel, a mother of four, was born in Britain and had done postgraduate studies at Australia's Monash University. According to an article she wrote in the Global Times, she first became seriously interested in studying China when she noticed the growing Australian poverty and homelessness.

She said that poverty alleviation is critical for any economy to improve and a society should not leave the most vulnerable behind. She noted that the most outstanding GDP growth in the Chinese provinces has been in Xinjiang, the region's population is growing, and there are no refugees, evidence which she couldn't reconcile with the "genocide" claims. She decided to explore how this happened and what learnings can there be for Australia.

Her inchoate idea was also corroborated by the higher standard of living of her close friends in China (Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu). She told Global Times that her first brush with Chinese was through her daughter, who had Chinese friends at school. She described them as kind and good-educated students but added that Australian students were not so welcoming of them. One of them had been kicked by a local student and another was violently shoved in a shopping mall, Huebel learned from her daughter.

As Huebel was raised by an open-minded father who told her to travel and embrace different cultures, she invited these Chinese students to her home for tea, she said. "After they returned to China, we kept in touch, and I began to learn more about China," she added.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18771054

File: bf0eba6b81001d9⋯.jpg (106.76 KB,1080x810,4:3,Maureen_Huebel_takes_a_pic….jpg)

>>18771047

2/2

Truth about China "tainted" by controlled Western media

After increased contact with Chinese people, Huebel is getting more critical and suspicious of Western reports about China. She believes that people in the West are convinced that China is bad and that is mostly because of the controlled Western media.

"The mainstream media in the West is taken to be accurate, with very few questioning its narratives," Huebel said in her article. She added that Western mainstream media is highly concentrated and focused on promoting its political interests, and its influence is significant in shaping the narrative and opinions of the average Australian.

"Once the media is controlled, the truth will be tainted," Huebel said.

In Huebel's eyes, the Chinese government's policy is common prosperity, and its words and deeds are defensive rather than aggressive. Chinese Confucianism stresses the importance of good moral character and promotes harmony in a multi-polar world with a win-win strategy, Huebel added.

She also said that many Australians are not familiar with China as their education system provides them with very limited information about the country. Fears that China might "invade" Australia stem from the history of the Japanese invasion in World War II, but the truth is that China was in the anti-fascist camp during World War II, Huebel noted.

"We should improve our education system so that more people can realize that we do not live in America, but next to Asia. We need to better understand the environment in which Australia lives," Huebel said.

She believes that her Twitter suffering is an example of the result of growing U.S. fears as China's growth trajectory is set to overtake the American economy in a few years and Australia is experiencing pressure from the U.S. in every aspect of their lives.

She said that the major challenge of the Australian government is striking a balance between what the U.S. wants Australia to do and what Australia wants to do. She suggested that Australia should stop acting like a U.S. follower and become an "adult" acting in its own interests.

"China is not a threat, but an opportunity," Huebel said. "We should get involved in cooperation with China."

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202304/28/WS644b3c62a310b6054fad060c.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18771116

File: eba048fd977450a⋯.jpg (30.88 KB,500x352,125:88,Malicious_attacks_can_t_st….jpg)

>>18770941

Malicious attacks can't stop my research about Xinjiang

Maureen Huebel - Mar 23, 2023

1/2

I first became seriously interested in studying China when I noticed the growing Australian poverty and homelessness. At the same time, my close friends in China (Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu) were enjoying a higher standard of living which was thriving. The most outstanding GDP growth in the Chinese provinces was identified as Xinjiang. I wanted to learn more as I couldn't reconcile the fact that there was a "genocide" in Xinjiang with evidence that there was a growing population and no refugees. For example, Ukraine has had over eight million people leave the country as refugees, and the bottom has fallen out of the Ukrainian economy with public servants and teachers not being paid.

I joined Twitter to do preliminary research, but I did not expect the outrage that I would receive from Western people. A backlash blew up even before I started the project. The West is convinced that China is bad, so I couldn't be a critical thinker and say anything good about China, despite the fact that I am an established scholar in Australia and Britain with many published papers. Allegations of being a sophisticated Chinese Bot quickly emerged, but this was clearly shown to be false once I proved to the world to be a real person.

The mainstream media in the West is taken to be accurate, with very few questioning its narratives, particularly if it is produced by the ABC or the BBC. Australian mainstream media is one of the most concentrated in the Western world, with the main narrative explained through three groups: NewsCorp Australia, 9Entertainment and 7WestMedia, who control the lion's share of print, news websites and TV. Their influence is significant in shaping the narrative and opinions of the average Australian. The US media, with 90 percent of its media controlled by six corporations - AT&T, CBS, Comcast, Disney, NewsCorp and Viacom, is also highly concentrated and focused on promoting its political interests.

Australia experiences pressure from the US in every aspect of our lives. At this point in history, the US is seriously threatened by the amazing economic growth of China. China's growth trajectory is set to overtake the US economy in a few years. American hegemony, with its international power and control, is now weakening.

This loss of US power is already showing up in the US banking system. It's starting to show cracks, with international trade being transacted less in US dollars. Competing international transfer mechanisms have emerged in local currencies instead of SWIFT, the primary US international transfer mechanism. SWIFT required local currencies to be swapped into US dollars before being converted into a recipient currency. The US felt it was entitled to take a percentage of international trade by transacting in US dollars. This is now changing as international contracts are being written in local currencies rather than in US dollars, permitting economies more control over their own import and export prices.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18771119

File: c0fbc57e2a3c21f⋯.jpg (161.01 KB,1080x1527,360:509,2023042722424147834.jpg)

File: 95e11dd7366b41a⋯.jpg (58.04 KB,640x545,128:109,2023042722431640588.jpg)

>>18771116

2/2

Since I announced on Twitter that I was planning to go to Xinjiang in 2024 to research poverty alleviation, I have been hounded by trolls and people insulting me on Twitter, sometimes ganging up on me with a Twitter pile-on, these include death threats.

I started by contacting Adrian Zenz, who conducted the original research on Xinjiang and made the claim of "genocide," "forced labor" and "human rights abuses." I asked him for his field research notes and methodology and published peer-reviewed journals. He strangely took offense to this and behaved in a way I have never experienced from other scholars. He blocked me and, together with other Americans, had me indefinitely suspended from Twitter. I had to ask Monash University to write to Twitter to state that I had been associated with the University and had done research there, and my research was published. Twitter then reinstated my account.

I approached the principal of the Australian Centre on China in the World of the Australian National University (ANU) for her to be my mentor and supervisor. At first, she had a favorable approach to what I was studying.

Then, at the Canberra Press Club, the principal had heard from some researchers in Xinjiang that she knew and respected were too afraid to put their names to their research papers. The principal stated through their research that Zenz's claims may not be factually correct. She was immediately stood down on indefinite sick leave, and approved grants to study research grants on China were canceled.

When I visited China in the World at the ANU, I encountered people who were full of fear and afraid to speak to me. They had just concluded a conference on academic freedom of speech and what was happening to it.

The more opposition I got, the more determined I became to forge a path to complete my project. I was blocking trolls that did not contribute to the research, sometimes 10 at a time, who ganged up on me, to what is called a Twitter pile-on.

As poverty alleviation is critical for any economy to improve, I decided to visit Xinjiang myself. We should not leave our most vulnerable behind. I will be exploring how this has happened in China and what learnings can be for Australia. It is good for a country to have its participants be active contributors to it. It becomes a win-win situation. This will be the focus of the not-for-profit foundation which I have started in Australia.

The author is an Australian scholar. She writes in an honorary capacity. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202303/1287831.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18771201

File: f38911805930d39⋯.jpg (2.62 MB,4032x3024,4:3,HMS_Anson_Britain_s_newest….jpg)

File: dea382a498aaef6⋯.jpg (437.41 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Australia_s_Deputy_Prime_M….jpg)

File: d8ad285b0efeef8⋯.jpg (2.16 MB,3217x4096,3217:4096,The_discovery_of_the_files….jpg)

>>18670474

Australia’s AUKUS partner red-faced after sub files found in pub’s toilet

Rob Harris - April 29, 2023

London: Australia’s partner in the $368 billion AUKUS defence deal has been left red-faced after official documents about one of its Astute-class submarines were found in the toilets of a local pub.

Files carrying details about HMS Anson were left in the Furness Railway in Cumbria, alongside a Royal Navy lanyard, and showed the inner workings of the nuclear-powered submarine and were used by submariners learning how to isolate and depressurise elements of its system.

The pub is a short distance from a BAE systems shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness, where Australian submariners will undergo training as part of the agreement with Britain and the United States over the cutting-edge nuclear submarines.

The Royal Navy has played down part of the report carried in Britain’s The Sun newspaper, which said the files, marked “official sensitive”, were discovered on the floor of a cubicle.

Government guidance says ­that information marked “Sensitive” must only be shared on “genuine need to know” and could have damaging ­consequences if lost, stolen or ­published.

The Royal Navy said it would investigate the breach, but said the papers were generic resources and did not contain any classified information.

“These are generic training documents that carry no classified information,” a Royal Navy spokesman said. “However, we take all security matters extremely seriously and will investigate the circumstances of their discovery.”

HMS Anson is the fifth of the new Astute-class attack submarines to join the Royal Navy fleet. The vessels are capable of firing tomahawk missiles and described as the “largest, most advanced and most powerful attack submarines” ever used.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is anticipated to visit the secure facility when he travels the UK next week ahead of attending King Charles III’s coronation. In the past year, Defence Minister Richard Marles and Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy have visited the base, as well as South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas.

Last month it was revealed the first Australian-built nuclear-powered submarines, fitted with vertical launch systems to fire cruise missiles, would be British-designed and incorporate US technology.

The submarines will be developed by BAE Systems at its Barrow-in-Furness shipyard before Australia expands it capability at Osborne, west of Adelaide. The SSN-AUKUS class will replace the Royal Navy’s Astute-class boats when they enter into operation.

The AUKUS pact is intended to help Australia secure nuclear-powered submarines as part of a wider push to counter China’s military might, but will also eventually result in the three nations co-operating in other areas, such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing and cyber warfare.

Albanese has described AUKUS as the “single biggest leap” in Australia’s defence capabilities, but concerns remain about Australia’s reliance on the US and the maze of export controls that could slow the transfer of the nuclear-propulsion or other technology.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/australia-s-aukus-partner-red-faced-after-sub-files-found-in-pub-s-toilet-20230429-p5d4a0.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18771231

File: 501d5bd21ee2aad⋯.jpg (991.1 KB,3000x1317,1000:439,HMS_Anson_leaves_Barrow_fo….jpg)

File: 56a2ec72069644e⋯.jpg (58.17 KB,956x619,956:619,The_sensitive_files_were_f….jpg)

File: 7c03f84251f7317⋯.jpg (1.18 MB,3000x2000,3:2,The_Furness_Railway_pub_in….jpg)

File: 392627b933b7c4d⋯.jpg (247.91 KB,2100x1353,700:451,The_sub_is_armed_with_Toma….jpg)

>>18670474

>>18771201

TORPED’OH Secret plans from £1.3billion nuclear submarine found in toilet cubicle at Wetherspoons pub

Jerome Starkey - 28 Apr 2023

SECRET nuclear sub plans were found in a toilet cubicle at a Wetherspoons pub.

Classified files on £1.3billion HMS Anson had been dropped in The Furness Railway in Barrow, Cumbria.

A source said: “It was lucky a Russian spy didn’t find them.”

The files showed the inner workings of the ­torpedo-loaded vessel.

Key detail on HMS Anson’s hydraulics, which control torpedo hatches, steering and buoyancy, were in the dossier.

It was found in the boozer with a Royal Navy lanyard from the new £1.3bn vessel.

A source said the pub was packed when the papers, marked Official Sensitive, were found on Saturday night.

Government guidance says ­that information marked “Sensitive” must only be shared on “genuine need to know” and could have damaging ­consequences if lost, stolen or ­published.

The source said: “It was quite a lively night.

“The pub was full of people from the docks — military and civilian.

“I went into the toilet and the plans were lying on the floor of the cubicle with the lanyard.

“Anyone could have found them.

“It was lucky it wasn’t some deep cover Russian spy.”

A naval source said the ­documents were part of a reference manual that is readily available on board.

Anybody who had worked on the submarine would have used the manual.

Official sensitive documents are one level below Secret.

Former sub captain, Commander Ryan Ramsay said: “It looks like someone has taken the pages off the boat to study.

“They are part of a book that cover all the systems on a sub.

“When they do their basic submarine qualification they have to walk round the boat to demonstrate they know all the systems.

“It is good to see their commitment to training, but the pub is probably the wrong place.”

The boozer is a five-minute walk from the BAE Systems’ shipyard where workers build Astute class hunter-killer subs.

HMS Anson is the fifth such vessel.

It launched in February and is now based at His Majesty’s Naval Base, Clyde, Scotland, for sea trials.

It is armed with Spearfish torpedoes and Tomahawk land attack missiles.

The Navy describes the sub as the “cutting edge of the UK’s military capabilities” and the most advanced hunter-killer in the world.

HMS Anson’s nuclear reactors mean it can go 25 years without refuelling.

And it can circumnavigate the globe without resurfacing.

Air and water are made onboard so the only limit to deployment is how much food it carries for crew.

Last night a Navy spokesperson told The Sun the papers were “generic training documents.”

They added: “However, we take all security matters extremely seriously and will investigate the circumstances of their discovery.”

Two years ago The Sun told how classified defence documents were found in a soggy heap at a bus stop in Kent.

They contained details of covert missions for UK special forces in Afghanistan after the US withdrawal.

An investigation found papers were removed from the MoD by top civil servant Angus Lapsley, who briefly had his security clearances revoked.

But the married dad-of-two was later promoted to Nato’s Assistant Secretary General responsible for defence policy and planning.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/22198059/secret-nuclear-submarine-plans-found-wetherspoons-toilet/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18771278

File: ca4c392e984fd76⋯.jpg (453.93 KB,825x953,825:953,MRF_D_57.jpg)

File: 136678848285bb6⋯.jpg (298.24 KB,1408x1408,1:1,Fu28Xq5aQAMGSvn.jpg)

File: 5ec62fd85735130⋯.jpg (907.04 KB,3276x2185,3276:2185,Fu28RlNaEAEyzGA.jpg)

File: a99a1fdcc7d6743⋯.jpg (1.18 MB,4096x2731,4096:2731,Fu28iSBacAYKa5x.jpg)

>>18676841

>>18749439

Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Tweet

Lest we forget

This week MRF-D Marines and Sailors celebrate Anzac day alongside @DefenceAust

Anzac Day commemorates Australian, New Zealand, and Allied service members for displaying discipline, courage, and self sacrifice in service to their country.

#LestWeForget #AnzacDay

https://twitter.com/MRFDarwin/status/1652187186354348032

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18771291

File: c564e909419564f⋯.jpg (319.4 KB,1298x467,1298:467,MRF_D_58.jpg)

File: 6b7e4a9ddd43924⋯.jpg (854.73 KB,1408x1408,1:1,343597716_120447164332844_….jpg)

File: f17cdaeb716dbc6⋯.jpg (507.73 KB,1408x1408,1:1,343602120_214710017936428_….jpg)

File: c178417d26cc52e⋯.jpg (311.03 KB,1408x1408,1:1,343593007_1258315341436883….jpg)

File: 8019dbc82d28f9d⋯.jpg (238.63 KB,1366x1366,1:1,343616303_259756789756274_….jpg)

>>18676841

>>18749439

Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post

28 April 2023

LEST WE FORGET

This week, Marines with Marine Rotational Force Darwin alongside Defence Australia Allies, participated in Anzac Day celebrations across the Northern Territory.

Anzac Day commemorates current and former Australian, New Zealand, and Allied service members for displaying discipline, courage, and self-sacrifice in service to their country.

#lestweforget2023 #anzacday #FreeAndOpenIndoPacific

(U.S. Marine Corps photos by LCpl. Brayden Daniel and Royal Australian Air Force photos by Sgt. Pete Gammie)

https://www.facebook.com/MRFDarwin/posts/603960525099768

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18775267

File: 31bffb801955d12⋯.jpg (117.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Disgraced_ex_Lord_Mayor_Ro….jpg)

File: a0b74a0c7050d2a⋯.jpg (208.3 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0001.jpg)

Disgraced ex-lord mayor stripped of Order of Australia title

ANGELICA SNOWDEN - APRIL 30, 2023

Former Melbourne lord mayor Robert Doyle has had his Order of Australia honour stripped by Governor-General David Hurley.

Mr Doyle, who became embroiled in sexual misconduct allegations in late 2017, had his companion of the Order of Australia terminated last month according to a gazette notice published on Friday.

A spokesman for the Council for the Order of Australia, who advise the Governor-general about nominations, said he could not answer questions about why a decision was made now more than four years after the allegations were made public.

“The Governor-General acts on advice of the Council for the Order of Australia in relation to terminations and cancellations,” he said.

“It reviews matters brought to its attention by the public. The council doesn't comment on individual cases.”

It has previously been reported that the Council received complaints about Mr Doyle including one in 2022 after he received the award in 2017 before allegations against him were made public.

Three women accused him of sexual misconduct and harassment and their allegations became public in late 2017, prompting his resignation as Lord Mayor in 2018.

An independent investigation conducted by Barrister Ian Freckleton reported Mr Doyle touched the breast of councillor Tessa Sullivan in 2017 in the mayoral car. It also upheld a complaint made by another councillor Cathy Oke, who said Mr Doyle inappropriately touched her thigh during a dinner in 2014.

Dr Freckleton ultimately made four findings of gross misconduct against the two women in the report released in 2018, after Mr Doyle refused to participate in the investigation.

Dr Freckleton handed down a supplementary report in 2020 when he found Mr Doyle also behaved in a “sexually inappropriate” way towards Kharla Williams at a Melbourne Health event in 2016.

The Department of Health also conducted a separate report into the allegations made by Ms Williams and found Mr Doyle put his hand on her back and on her inner left leg, near her groin, several times and spoke to her in a “sleazy” way.

Mr Doyle initially denied all the allegations against him but in 2021 broke a three year silence and said he was “very sorry” for his actions.

“When you see the pain you’ve caused and the potential pain I might cause to my children, grandchildren, yes, it’s up there,” he told 3AW at the time.

“I’ve lost my family, I’ve lost love, I’ve lost relationships, I’ve lost friendships, I’ve lost health, I’ve lost reputation. But it’s not about Robert the victim … actions have consequences.”

No formal charges were ever laid against Mr Doyle by police.

The Council for the Order of Australia can terminate awards if the Governor-general is satisfied that “the holder of the appointment or award has behaved or acted in a manner that has brought disrepute on the Order”.

Mr Doyle did not respond to a request for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/disgraced-exlord-mayor-stripped-of-order-of-australia-title/news-story/1598c1a172af7113976320f1a2a4fd02

https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2023G00470

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18775283

File: c096c51c32a98fc⋯.jpg (509.95 KB,2000x1376,125:86,Father_Joseph_Doyle_who_di….jpg)

‘Jesus won’t forget this’: Catholic Church sued over alleged abuse by late Father Joe Doyle

Cameron Houston and Chris Vedelago - April 30, 2023

1/2

The Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne is being sued over the alleged sexual abuse of two school students in the 1970s and ’80s by a priest who was found by the church to be a paedophile in 2005 and continued to perform clerical duties for more than a decade.

Father Joseph Doyle, who died in 2021, has been accused of sexual abuse by two former students of Our Lady of Lourdes Primary School in Bayswater, where he served as parish priest for 37 years until his abrupt departure in 2005.

Doyle allegedly molested and raped an 8-year-old boy in 1979 after promising to make him captain of the school’s football team, according to a writ filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria against the church late last year.

It is alleged in court documents that Doyle said, “Jesus won’t forget this”, when the boy attempted to spurn his sexual advances. On another occasion, Doyle is accused of exposing himself to the student while administering the sacrament of confession.

In a second lawsuit against the church, filed last month, Doyle is accused of raping a year 5 girl in the presbytery after befriending her parents in 1989. He allegedly “groomed” the girl by asking her to sit on his lap at the parish school.

“Following the abuse, Doyle informed the plaintiff’s parents that she had been a ‘naughty girl’,” according to the statement of claim.

Maurice Blackburn lawyer John Rule, who is representing both plaintiffs, accused Doyle of grooming families before preying on their children.

“He wasn’t satisfied with sexually abusing kids, he had to psychologically torment them as well.

“Doyle tore apart so many lives and got away with it. He was allowed to retire quietly by the church without his parish knowing why. The police weren’t notified of his offending and he was able to keep his luxuries and allowances,” Rule said.

Rule said he was concerned the church could request the court to grant a permanent stay in the case because of the time that had elapsed since Doyle’s alleged offending.

“We have seen a rise in defendants using permanent stay applications in historical abuse cases to try and snuff out client’s rights,” he said.

A spokeswoman for the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne said it would be inappropriate to comment while the matter was before the court, including commenting on whether the church would apply for a permanent stay order.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18775287

File: 5e6dbf61d7f3f28⋯.jpg (622.25 KB,1100x1613,1100:1613,Father_Joseph_Doyle_pictur….jpg)

>>18775283

2/2

The lawsuits make numerous allegations about the church’s negligence in how it managed Doyle and its failure to adequately respond to repeated allegations of child sexual abuse made against him.

This included “creating a culture within the Archdiocese which tolerated sexual abuse by reason of the lack of investigation of allegations of abuse, lack of punishment of priests for sexual abuse and demonstrating a willingness to forgive priests for abuse without referral to Victoria Police”, according to one of the statements of claim.

In 2005, the church’s independent commissioner, Peter O’Callaghan, QC – who investigated claims of child sexual abuse on behalf of the Melbourne Archdiocese – found Doyle had abused two boys during the 1970s.

However, O’Callaghan’s report on the abuse was never referred to police.

Doyle was banned from practising as a priest by order of the Archdiocese and the Vatican – known as the withdrawal of faculties – which prevented him from conducting mass, last rites, blessings, weddings or funerals. He was also removed from his position in the Bayswater parish that year.

But the church kept the reason for Doyle’s sudden departure a secret from parishioners for more than a decade, with then vicar-general Bishop Les Tomlinson telling the congregation in 2005 that Doyle had simply retired.

The abuse findings were only publicly acknowledged by the church after the cover-up was exposed by The Age in 2016. The Archdiocese also issued an apology for its actions in concealing Doyle’s offending and the real reason for his departure.

Despite the order banning him from acting as a priest, Doyle continued to provide pastoral care to parishioners for more than a decade with the apparent complicity and silence of church authorities.

This included delivering mass alongside Bishop Tomlinson at a church in Mansfield in 2012.

Despite his disobedience, the archdiocese continued to financially support Doyle and claimed to be powerless to stop him from violating the terms of his ban.

“Joe has been pushing the boundaries. I think he is in denial about the seriousness of what has happened, and I suspect that this playing down of the seriousness may be shared by some of his confreres,” Archbishop Hart wrote in 2013 in a letter obtained by The Age in 2016.

“I have acted with the strongest resolve in these matters, but Joe has been particularly difficult.”

If you or anyone you know needs support call Lifeline 131 114, or Beyond Blue 1300 224 636.

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/jesus-won-t-forget-this-catholic-church-sued-over-alleged-abuse-by-late-father-joe-doyle-20230418-p5d180.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18775333

File: 464efe46343e13a⋯.jpg (1.89 MB,5126x3417,5126:3417,Calls_are_growing_within_t….jpg)

File: fb2a60678df6896⋯.jpg (4.52 MB,6384x4256,3:2,Frontbench_MP_James_Newbur….jpg)

>>18676743

Victorian Coalition frontbenchers speak out in push for free vote on Voice

Annika Smethurst - April 30, 2023

1/2

Senior state Coalition MPs will push for a free vote on the Indigenous Voice to parliament, putting them at odds with their federal counterparts who will campaign against constitutional change.

The decision whether to bind Coalition MPs to a formal position will be put to shadow cabinet at a meeting on Monday, according to two senior Coalition sources who spoke to The Sunday Age on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters.

The Victorian parliamentary Liberal Party hasn’t reached a formal position on the Voice to parliament, but leader John Pesutto has so far refused to back federal leader Peter Dutton’s opposition to a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous Voice.

Three state Liberal frontbenchers – James Newbury, Jess Wilson and Evan Mulholland – told The Sunday Age that they will lobby for MPs to be given the choice to vote or campaign Yes or No, rather than being forced into a party position.

With Liberal MPs split on whether to support constitutional change, Pesutto is expected to grant a free vote, according to several senior party sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Allowing MPs a free vote could help mend deepening divisions within the partyroom, just a month after the blowup over Moira Deeming’s attendance at an anti-trans rights rally.

Pressure is also growing on Victorian Nationals leader Peter Walsh, who last year backed his federal counterpart David Littleproud’s decision to formally oppose an Indigenous Voice to parliament.

The Sunday Age has confirmed the Victorian National partyroom will also discuss its position on a constitutionally enshrined Voice when parliament returns this week.

Two National Party MPs, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters, said the party urgently needed to settle on a formal position and discuss whether MPs should be granted a free vote.

While Victoria’s MPs won’t be asked to vote on any legislative element ahead of the referendum, several frontbench MPs expect the Andrews government to try to wedge Liberal and National Party MPs on the issue by bringing on a motion supporting constitutional change, prompting the calls for the Coalition to settle on a position.

Within the Victorian Liberal Party, there are growing numbers of MPs who want a free vote on whether to enshrine the Voice in the Constitution, with several privately critical of Dutton’s decision to bind his shadow cabinet to oppose the Voice.

Newbury, the opposition equality, environment and climate change spokesperson, said it was time for the Victorian Liberal Party to let the community know its “constructive position on the Voice”.

“I think the community expects us to have a position soon, and I trust the party leadership in ensuring that happens,” he said.

“The most constructive way forward is to allow all members a free vote and talk about the reasons why they may or may not support the proposal.”

In calling for a free vote, Newbury – who won’t declare whether he is for or against constitutional change until the party’s position is settled – took a thinly veiled swipe at the federal opposition, saying “Australians don’t want a destructive opposition”.

“Being oppositionist on a question that is fundamentally about rights will only be seen as being destructive,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18775340

File: 6ebad075afc1eac⋯.jpg (1.71 MB,5472x3648,3:2,Jess_Wilson_and_Evan_Mulho….jpg)

File: 3c062bf02abe757⋯.jpg (5.74 MB,7445x4963,7445:4963,Victorian_Nationals_leader….jpg)

>>18775333

2/2

Wilson, the opposition homeownership, finance and economic reform spokesperson, is still considering her position on the Voice referendum but said she wanted a free vote.

“Changing our Constitution is significant, and a robust, productive and respectful debate is an important part of our democracy,” she said.

“The ability to have a free vote on matters of constitutional change is a great strength of the Liberal Party – and was best exhibited in the 1999 referendum where John Howard openly supported the monarchy while his treasurer, Peter Costello, supported becoming a republic.”

Mulholland – who is inclined to oppose the Voice – also called on his party to back a free vote, also citing the 1999 referendum as an example of the Liberal Party “showing that they were mature in having a free vote”.

“The Liberal Party has a long tradition of allowing members to speak their mind, in contrast to the Labor Party,” the cabinet secretary said.

The Sunday Age spoke to six Coalition MPs who are prepared to support the Yes campaign if they are granted a free vote. Others, including Mulholland and Upper House MPs Renee Heath and Beverley McArthur, have already declared their opposition to constitutional change.

Pesutto is expected to wait until the release of a parliamentary report on the Voice before forming a position, but has said he was keeping an “open mind” on supporting the referendum.

Victoria has already enacted both the treaty and truth elements of the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Last year, the Victorian opposition stared down internal dissent from a handful of conservatives MPs to support establishing the Treaty Authority, the body responsible for overseeing negotiations between the government and Victoria’s Aboriginal communities.

National Party sources said Walsh – who is also the Coalition’s Aboriginal affairs spokesperson – was unlikely to change his personal opposition to the Voice.

“We want to solve disadvantages for all Australians right across the board, including Indigenous Australians. The question is: is this going to do that? And I’m not sure it is,” Walsh told ABC radio last November.

If Nationals MPs are granted a free vote, and choose to back the Yes campaign, that would put them at odds with their federal counterparts in the referendum scheduled for the end of the year.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/victorian-coalition-frontbenchers-speak-out-in-push-for-free-vote-on-voice-20230429-p5d484.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18775344

File: 5f743d04722ef8b⋯.jpg (2.47 MB,4908x3272,3:2,Leading_campaigner_for_the….jpg)

File: 042a92f92fc8b42⋯.jpg (78.09 KB,697x632,697:632,Voice_to_parliament.jpg)

>>18676743

Yes vote for the Voice is leading in every state and territory: Poll

Anthony Galloway - April 30, 2023

1/2

The Yes campaign to enshrine an Indigenous Voice within Australia’s constitution is ahead in every state and territory, the most comprehensive poll conducted on the proposal has revealed, placing it on course to deliver the first referendum to pass in four decades.

The first dedicated state-by-state poll on the Voice to parliament has recorded the Yes vote on 51 per cent across the nation, while 34 per cent said they would vote No and 15 per cent were undecided.

It would also reach the critical benchmark of support in a majority of states, while the Yes side was ahead in Queensland and Western Australia but fell short of 50 per cent support.

The YouGov poll of 15,060 Australians was commissioned by the group behind the Uluru Statement from the Heart and is the largest poll conducted on the upcoming referendum.

The new poll had the Yes vote on a higher support level than the results of the latest Resolve Political Monitor, conducted for this masthead by research company Resolve Strategic, which recorded a Yes vote of 46 per cent, the No vote on 31 per cent and the undecided vote on 22 per cent.

The YouGov polling was conducted between March 1 and 21 amid a political brawl over the wording of the constitutional amendment but before Liberal MP Julian Leeser’s resignation from the opposition frontbench over his party’s decision to oppose the Voice.

Australians are expected to vote on the referendum to enshrine a constitutionally enshrined Voice to parliament, and to recognise Indigenous Australians in the nation’s founding document, between October and December this year. The body would be able to make representations to the parliament and the government on issues that impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

For the referendum to succeed, it must gain the support of a majority of voters nationally as well as a majority of voters in a majority of states.

The poll showed the Yes side at or above 50 per cent in four of the six states: Victoria, NSW, South Australia and Tasmania.

In Queensland, the Yes side was on 47 per cent, No was on 40 per cent, and 14 per cent were undecided.

In Western Australia, 48 per cent said they would vote Yes, 37 per cent said No, and the undecided vote was on 15 per cent.

In Tasmania, the Yes vote was teetering at the edge on 50 per cent, but the No side was down on 35 per cent. In South Australia the Yes vote was on 51 per cent, compared with the No vote on 34 per cent.

ACT recorded the highest Yes vote of any jurisdiction with 64 per cent of voters backing the referendum, while the Yes vote was on 52 per cent in the Northern Territory. While the votes of territories count in the national vote, they don’t factor into the second test for referendums to pass.

In Victoria, the Yes vote was on 53 per cent and No was on 31 per cent; in NSW Yes was on 52 per cent and No was on 32 per cent.

The poll did not force respondents to choose a side, meaning it was not known where the undecided voters could fall.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18775349

File: 1599446f70ab8b3⋯.jpg (238.23 KB,1053x594,39:22,Support_for_a_Voice_to_par….jpg)

>>18775344

2/2

Leading referendum advocate Professor Megan Davis said the results showed that the Australian people were “ready to accept the invitation of the Voice”.

“Our message is connecting,” she said. “We’re going to keep going, talking about the difference this will make to improve the lives of First Nation people across the country right up until referendum day.”

The proposal for a constitutionally enshrined advisory body to parliament has caused division among some high-profile Indigenous Australians, with independent senator Lidia Thorpe, Coalition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and former Labor national president Warren Mundine campaigning against the proposal.

But the poll showed 83 per cent of Indigenous Australians supported the Voice, based on a national sample size of 732.

Davis said Indigenous Australians believed the Voice was a chance to achieve better outcomes for their communities, and the poll reflected that.

The Albanese government has been criticised by the opposition for not providing enough detail ahead of the public vote, including who will be eligible to serve on the body and how it will be structured.

Price said people around the country were telling her that they are “genuinely confused and angry” as to why Albanese was pushing “his vanity Canberra Voice project so hard”.

“The more the prime minister refuses to provide detail, the more Australians are waking up to his divisive Voice proposal,” she said.

“The Voice is a divisive proposal that will do nothing to help Indigenous communities and I think Australians are seeing that and will say No to being divided by race.”

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said she was confident that the more Australians hear about constitutional recognition through a Voice, the more they will support it.

“Australians get that the Voice is about making a practical difference to the lives of Indigenous Australians by giving communities a say in their future,” she said.

The poll showed four Liberal-held marginal seats – Deakin, Sturt, Casey and Banks – recorded a Yes vote above 50 per cent.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s seat of Dickson in outer-Brisbane had a Yes vote of 47 per cent, compared with a No vote of 40 per cent.

Seven Labor-held marginals – Bennelong, Higgins, Robertson, Tangney, Boothby, Hunter and Chisholm – recorded Yes votes above 50 per cent.

The central Queensland seat of Maranoa, held by Nationals leader David Littleproud, had the biggest No vote, with 50 per cent against the referendum and 36 per cent supportive.

Labor frontbencher Tanya Plibersek’s seat of Sydney received the biggest support, with 76 per cent for Yes and 14 per cent No.

The poll used a new statistical technique called MRP (multi-level regression with post-stratification) – which combines the results from the national survey with electorate-level information from the census and other government agencies.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/yes-vote-for-the-voice-is-leading-in-every-state-and-territory-poll-20230429-p5d482.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779626

File: 13f105fbd80abb7⋯.mp4 (15.88 MB,640x360,16:9,Shocking_scenes_of_violenc….mp4)

>>18687374

>>18698609

>>18754977

Wild brawl in Alice Springs as Northern Territory police chief Jamie Chalker exits

LIAM MENDES and KRISTIN SHORTEN - MAY 1, 2023

1/2

Shocking scenes of violence have played out on the streets of Alice Springs just as Northern Territory police commissioner Jamie Chalker exits his job, leaving the beleaguered Territory government hunting for a new police chief amid a fresh wave of alcohol-fuelled crime and racial tension.

The government reached a “confidential settlement” with Mr Chalker, who will now retire, following a botched attempt to ­revoke his appointment six months before his contract expired.

The announcement blindsided Northern Territory Police members who were not informed ­before the government released a joint statement with Mr Chalker on Sunday morning, averting a costly and embarrassing Supreme Court stoush.

The 53-year-old commissioner had been due to serve evidence on Monday in his civil case against Chief Minister Natasha Fyles and Police Minister Kate Worden to prevent his removal.

He was also expected to issue subpoenas for communications between Ms Fyles and Ms Worden over the bungled attempt to push him out.

Deputy Commissioner Michael Murphy will continue in the top job until the recruitment process for Mr Chalker’s replacement is complete.

Mr Chalker’s departure came as police in Alice Springs at the weekend confronted some of the worst violence in recent memory.

In one incident seen and filmed by The Australian from 2.42am on Saturday, officers were forced to storm a takeaway pizza shop with their Tasers drawn in pursuit of youths who had allegedly armed themselves with a kitchen knife after being ­involved in a wild street brawl with caucasian and Indigenous men.

Indigenous senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said the footage was “plain and simple evidence” that the Northern Territory government “has lost complete control of law and order”.

“That makes my blood curdle to see those sorts of scenes of violence, especially knowing that I’ve got a 24-year-old son who lives in this town,” she said.

“It is evident that this government is failing and if they don’t step in and do what they need to do in terms of what’s been sought of them to ask for assistance from the AFP to restore law and order, then, I’d be urging the Albanese government to intervene.”

Revellers leaving a nightclub in the early hours of Saturday morning fought among each other after an argument escalated into an all-out melee, with a chair used as a weapon. Several individuals who had been involved in the brawl then barricaded themselves inside the pizza shop, with one reported to have grabbed a large kitchen knife, to the horror of shop staff.

Earlier, the group had turned on two caucasian men, one of whom had tried to involve himself in the dispute, brutally bashing them as they lay on the ground.

Police arrived 15 minutes after the first signs of trouble and broke up the brawl, but a panicked pizza shop employee ran outside, calling frantically to the officers.

“There’s a man with a knife ­inside, they are out the back,” the worker said.

The officers entered the building, drawing their Tasers.

“Police, come out, police, come out,” one yelled as they cleared the shop.

Another officer found a man hiding in the rear carpark.

The shop owner told police how she had confronted the man who had taken one of her large pizza knives.

“They just came in, one person, he has so many (knives), he grabbed two, three, I said ‘brother, give me, don’t hold the knife’,” she said. “He just sweared at me and they just ran.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779631

File: caf0b44caaff6cd⋯.jpg (261.71 KB,1280x720,16:9,Violence_erupts_the_outsid….jpg)

File: 7f13074de76fa5b⋯.jpg (135.6 KB,768x768,1:1,The_government_has_lost_co….jpg)

File: ef1a067eaa3d759⋯.jpg (86.21 KB,768x1024,3:4,Jamie_Chalker.jpg)

>>18779626

2/2

Senator Price said she had not seen violence to this extent.

“You just can’t expect people in our community to continue to just put up with that level of violence and become desensitised to it.

“We need more police and tougher consequences, especially for recidivism, to deter anti-social behaviour.

“The NT government has to put politics aside and reach out for assistance from the AFP to ­increase police presence.

“At the root of the problem more needs to be done to address child protection and welfare to help get these kids off the streets and into loving and caring homes where they can be given the attention and support they need to thrive.”

Federal MP for Lingiari Marion Scrymgour said the violence was “just disgusting – I just think it’s wrong and we’ve got to do something”.

“With Alice there’s issues with alcohol, but also I think there’s ­issues with illicit drugs like methamphetamines on the streets and that a lot of young Aboriginal people are having access to it,” she said.

Acting Commissioner Murphy, who was in Alice Springs at the time of the assaults, confirmed he would be putting his hand up for the top job, but did not feel the distractions surrounding Mr Chalker’s dismissal had been a “disaster” for the force.

“I think we’re in a pretty positive space to make a difference and bring Alice Springs back into a place to reduce crime because the harmful behaviours we see are confronting,” he told The Australian.

“The behaviours you still see later into the night aren’t acceptable to me, and they’re not acceptable to a number of government agencies so it’s about putting the resources on to address the issues.”

Acting Commissioner Murphy said Operation Drina, which began last November with the aim of reducing anti-social behaviour and associated crimes in Alice Springs, would be extended until the end of July.

“We’re going to have a dedicated division of police of over 40 officers committed to doing the same work on high visibility and ­engagement,” he said.

The costly employment dispute with Mr Chalker started when he received a letter from Ms Fyles late in March asking him to ­resign.

The undated letter raised four allegations including accusing him of making an unauthorised request for federal help to fight out-of-control crime in Alice Springs, which turned out to be baseless.

After receiving the letter on March 31, Mr Chalker hired high-profile Sydney legal duo Arthur Moses and Rebekah Giles and launched legal action against Ms Fyles, Ms Worden and the Territory government to prevent his removal.

It was always highly unlikely the Territory government would allow Mr Chalker to put on his evidence or expose the ministers to cross-examination. Sources said it appeared the defendants had ­offered an attractive package to Mr Chalker, ending his horror month of speculation and uncertainty.

In addition to Acting Commissioner Murphy, another likely contender for the top job is deputy chief executive officer of Families and Regional Services, Territory Families, Housing and Community Jeanette Kerr, a former assistant police commissioner.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/wild-brawl-in-alice-springs-as-northern-territory-police-chief-jamie-chalker-exits/news-story/37abc6aeaa1e285a4c70c1e63d9b7b5b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779687

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18676743

Abbott attacks Voice as Indigenous leader pushes for compromise

Lisa Visentin - May 1, 2023

1/2

Former prime minister Tony Abbott has told a parliamentary inquiry the Voice referendum will leave Australia embittered and divided and should be abandoned, while a key Indigenous leader has urged the government to consider changes to the amendment to shore up support among hesitant voters.

In a backdown by the parliamentary committee, Abbott received a last-minute invitation on Monday morning to give evidence at the final day of public hearings on the referendum inquiry after initially being blocked from appearing by Labor MPs.

A staunch opponent of the Voice, Abbott criticised the degree of public scrutiny given to the proposed Constitutional change as “altogether too abbreviated”, and argued the Voice would divide the country on the basis of ancestry and tie up government decision-making in High Court litigation.

“I think it’s a mistake to give about 4 per cent of the population more of a say over how our government and our parliament works than everyone else. I think that giving this Voice a right to make representations effectively to everyone on everything is going to make government much more difficult than it already is,” Abbott said.

He urged the committee to recommend that the government pull the referendum and start the consultation process again, saying that even if the Yes case was successful, it “will also likely leave us embittered and divided”.

But Indigenous academic Noel Pearson, one of the original architects of the Voice, urged the committee to reject Abbott’s views and leave the proposed constitutional amendment unchanged, describing the provision as “beautiful words” that would “adorn the Constitution”.

“I haven’t found a really compelling reason to change the words the government has introduced into the House … children of the future will look back on these words and really be proud of the Constitution,” Pearson said.

“The provision is not going to create a separate democracy. You are the democracy – our Senate and House of Representatives is our democracy. What the Voice does is improve it by giving a voice to the most marginal community in the country.”

A key flashpoint in the inquiry has been clause two of the proposed amendment to enshrine the Voice in the Constitution, which empowers the body to “make representations” to both the parliament and executive government. Some conservative legal thinkers and politicians believe the reference to “executive government” should be deleted to remove any risk of litigation on the basis the Voice had not been properly consulted about a government decision or policy.

In a significant departure from other Indigenous Voice advocates, Sean Gordon, a member of the Labor’s 21-member referendum advisory group alongside Pearson, said it would be Indigenous Australians who would suffer the consequences of a failed referendum, and tweaking the amendment must be an option to win over soft Yes voters.

“The parliament has a responsibility to ensure that what we put forward is worth winning from an Indigenous perspective and from an Australian community perspective, but that it is also winnable,” Gordon, the Indigenous chair of conservative think tank Uphold and Recognise, said.

“Because we need to then understand what are the consequences of not winning for Indigenous peoples specifically. Yes, there’ll be an impact on the nation, but our people will be severely impacted by a failed referendum.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779690

File: f79b692fd7e7c9f⋯.jpg (2.98 MB,4640x3093,4640:3093,Former_prime_minister_Tony….jpg)

File: eb0be1c4fa3a360⋯.jpg (795.97 KB,4000x2668,1000:667,Sean_Gordon_who_is_leading….jpg)

>>18779687

2/2

Uphold and Recognise, whose membership includes former Liberal Indigenous Australians minister Ken Wyatt as a director, has proposed deleting “executive government” and substituting “ministers of the state of the Commonwealth”.

Gordon said this option would still give effect to the key ambition for the Voice by Indigenous leaders that it must have the ability to influence policymaking and government action before a bill reaches the parliament.

“If we’re getting stuck on the term executive government, and if that’s what is going to determine whether we have a successful referendum or not then I really think we need to be thinking about that term.”

Indigenous No campaigner Warren Mundine, who is leading the anti-Voice group Recognise a Better Way, told the inquiry the referendum was dividing the country and claimed critics were scared to publicly oppose the Voice for fear of backlash.

“I get phone calls every day of the week from football players, people involved in AFL and rugby league and soccer … and they are saying they are scared, they don’t support the Voice but they are scared to come out about it. The only club that has approached me to have a conversation about the Voice … is the Collingwood football club,” he said.

But he added that if the referendum succeeded he would swing his support behind the Voice.

“If people vote Yes, if the Yes campaign gets up, I will fight for it to be successful. Why? Because even though I’m a No person, this is a democracy, people have the freedom and right to vote whatever way they want,” Mundine said.

Indigenous independent Victorian senator Lidia Thorpe, a Voice critic who has argued for treaty to take priority over constitutional recognition, claimed in a statement she had been actively excluded from the inquiry process.

“This whole Voice business goes against the culture of this land, the way we First Nations people listen to each other. When we talk with people we yarn, we don’t go into a meeting with blinkers on and ignore those that disagree with us to fast track our agenda,” she said.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/abbott-attacks-voice-as-indigenous-leader-pushes-for-compromise-20230501-p5d4j1.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNl9XywuclI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779729

File: f497f4eedb0bb63⋯.jpg (2.34 MB,3793x2715,3793:2715,Opposition_Leader_John_Pes….jpg)

File: 5eaa0848e255caf⋯.jpg (2.04 MB,5568x3712,3:2,Liberal_frontbench_MP_Jame….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18775333

‘Very important issue’: Victorian Liberals granted free vote on Voice, at odds with federal counterparts

Sumeyya Ilanbey - May 1, 2023

Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto will allow all his MPs a free vote on the Indigenous Voice to federal parliament, saying his members value the freedom to make their own choices on significant national issues.

Pesutto confirmed on Monday afternoon that his shadow cabinet had agreed to give MPs the right to campaign and vote Yes or No, rather than forcing them into a party position. This puts the state Coalition at odds with federal leader Peter Dutton, who has forced his frontbench to campaign against constitutional change.

“This is a very important issue for our nation, and I certainly believe as leader of the opposition here in Victoria, that it is important for the members of the Coalition to have a non-binding position,” Pesutto said.

“The [Liberal and National parties] value the freedom of each member on which way they’ll approach a national issue such as this.”

There was no material discussion on the substance of the Voice, and shadow cabinet ministers unanimously agreed to the position to give MPs a free vote, according to two senior sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Pesutto will put the decision to the Liberal party room on Tuesday, while Nationals leader Peter Walsh will put it to his party colleagues, where it is expected to be rubber-stamped.

The Coalition’s stance comes a month after Dutton formally announced his team would oppose the government’s model for an Indigenous Voice to parliament and campaign against it because it was risky and divisive.

That decision prompted former Indigenous Australians minister Ken Wyatt to resign his membership of the Liberal Party, and the Coalition’s Indigenous Australians spokesman Julian Leeser to quit the frontbench.

Three senior federal Liberals, Simon Birmingham, Paul Fletcher and Marise Payne, spoke out in shadow cabinet against the party’s plan to oppose the Voice, The Guardian reported last month.

Federal shadow ministers considered an alternative position proposed by Leeser to allow all members to have a free say on the Voice at least until a parliamentary committee considered calls to amend the constitutional alteration bill.

The state Coalition’s position avoids a potential public spat, and further erosion of support for Pesutto, who unsuccessfully pushed to expel Moira Deeming from the Liberal party room.

Coalition MPs are split on the Albanese government’s referendum to enshrine in the Constitution a Voice to federal parliament, and to recognise Indigenous Australians in the nation’s founding document. The body would be able to make representations to the parliament and the government on issues that impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

James Newbury, the opposition equality, environment and climate change spokesperson, told The Sunday Age it was time for the Victorian Liberal Party to let the community know its “constructive position on the Voice”.

“I think the community expects us to have a position soon, and I trust the party leadership in ensuring that happens,” he said. “The most constructive way forward is to allow all members a free vote and talk about the reasons why they may or may not support the proposal.”

Pesutto is expected to wait until the release of a parliamentary report on the Voice before forming a position himself, but has said he was keeping an “open mind” on supporting the referendum.

The referendum will be held sometime between October and December.

The Yes campaign is ahead in every state and territory, according to the most comprehensive poll conduct on the proposal. A YouGov poll of 15,060 Australians, commissioned by the group behind the Uluru Statement from the Heart, found the Yes vote was on 51 per cent across the nation, while 34 per cent said they would vote No and 15 per cent were undecided.

The first dedicated state-by-state poll on the Voice to parliament has recorded the Yes vote on 51 per cent across the nation, while 34 per cent said they would vote No and 15 per cent were undecided.

The new poll had the Yes vote on a higher support level than the results of the latest Resolve Political Monitor, conducted for this masthead by research company Resolve Strategic, which recorded a Yes vote of 46 per cent, the No vote on 31 per cent and the undecided vote on 22 per cent.

The YouGov polling was conducted between March 1 and 21 amid a political brawl over the wording of the constitutional amendment but before Leeser’s resignation from the opposition frontbench.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/victorian-liberals-granted-free-vote-on-voice-at-odds-with-federal-counterparts-20230501-p5d4i8.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779763

File: ceaaf9877b55a8c⋯.jpg (120.47 KB,1024x768,4:3,The_Prime_Minister_and_Pre….jpg)

File: fd09c20c5d40595⋯.jpg (213.61 KB,1024x768,4:3,Premier_Annastacia_Palaszc….jpg)

File: a5601d7b3d90bd2⋯.jpg (194.43 KB,1024x768,4:3,Protesting_elder_Wayne_Wha….jpg)

File: 9238ee1a4f3d044⋯.jpg (135.83 KB,1024x768,4:3,Members_of_the_public_wear….jpg)

File: ac0d212f0717bcf⋯.jpg (185.29 KB,768x1024,3:4,The_Labor_Day_march_in_Bri….jpg)

>>18676743

Brisbane Labour Day march 2023: Overwhelming support for Voice

Shaye Windsor - May 1, 2023

A lone Indigenous protester blocked Brisbane’s Labour Day march on Monday, opposing the proposal for a Voice to Parliament.

Elder Wayne Wharton lay on the roadway in Brisbane’s CBD as he advocated for a treaty rather than the constitutional Voice.

He was removed by police before he could disrupt the procession.

Other protesters chanted, “Treaty before Voice.”

However they were outnumbered by the marchers and speakers at the event championing the yes vote for the Voice.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, visiting Brisbane, recommitted his government to the implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, starting with the Voice.

“We will give Australians the opportunity to vote yes for a better future in the last quarter of this year.”

He told the Labour Day crowd he had fulfilled his promise to return to Queensland as Prime Minister.

“My friends, I came here last year as the Labor leader, and I stood here and I promised to be back as the Prime Minister this year, and here we are.”

Mr Albanese promised to ease cost-of-living pressure for Queenslanders in the upcoming federal Budget.

“And in the Budget, which is just eight sleeps away, what you’ll see is cost of living support for people under pressure,” he said.

“What you’ll see is a plan to make sure that those people in central Queensland and other areas, dealing with change in the economy, are not left behind.”

Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk echoed Mr Albanese’s guarantee that the federal and state Labor governments will deliver cost of living relief.

“I agree with the Prime Minister, his budget will be focused on cost of living and our budget next month will be focused on cost of living relief as well,” she told the crowd at the showgrounds.

Ms Palaszczuk also detailed a number of workers rights initiatives that were first implemented in Queensland.

“We were the first state to make industrial manslaughter a crime. We were the first state to bring in labour licensing laws.”

“We were the first state to bring in paid domestic and family violence leave, and we were the first state to outlaw fake unions in this state.”

She acknowledged the “mighty” union movement for this work and told the crowd how she advocated for female workers at Expo 88 to receive back pay 30 years ago.

“I worked at Expo and I remember women coming to me, talking to me about how they weren’t getting paid fairly and they weren’t getting breaks.”

“And guess what, the union stepped in after I called them up and as a young student. I called them up and they got back paid over five years.”

Federal Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Tony Burke took to the stage and reiterated pro-worker campaigns from Queensland now applied nationally.

“You had the best equal pay remuneration clause in the country, and we’ve now applied that nationally.”

Mr Burke highlighted the application of paid family and domestic violence leave to all workers federally, including casuals.

“Regardless of what your work status is, family and domestic violence doesn’t choose based on what your work classification is,” he said.

“No one, absolutely no one should ever have to choose between her safety and her pay, and that’s now law.”

On the Voice, Mr Burke lauded the “generous” Welcome to Country led by former chairman of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Board, Uncle Bob Anderson.

“I’m pleased to be part of a government and a movement that wants to return that other generous gesture, which is the Uluru Statement from the Heart,” Mr Burke said.

“An incredibly generous invitation to Australia to be part with you, of Australians returning that generosity and saying yes, we will walk together later this year in a referendum vote.”

Representatives from a range of advocacy groups joined the march including Decrim QLD chanting ‘Sex work is real work’, and ‘blow jobs are real jobs’, in support of the decriminalisation of sex work.

Other advocacy groups present included the Free Julian Assange movement, the Community and Public Sector Union, the Media and Entertainment & Arts Alliance and the National Tertiary and Education Union.

They were all preceded by the United Workers Union with Mr Albanese and Ms Palaszczuk at the lead.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/blow-jobs-are-real-jobs-sex-work-advocates-cause-a-stir-at-march/news-story/5a140b1c437527820d74d114409df8a6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779781

File: 54e0bdb7f34169c⋯.jpg (80.22 KB,1200x675,16:9,Shingo_Yamagami_has_now_he….jpg)

>>18744473

>>18755020

Five Eyes: Departing Japanese ambassador flags ambition for nation to join intelligence alliance

Kimberley Caines - 1 May 2023

1/2

Japan is hoping to join the Five Eyes international intelligence alliance as it stands on the front line of strategic challenges facing the region, the country’s top diplomat in Australia has said.

Shingo Yamagami is also urging Australia to move urgently on defence, warning of growing security concerns from China in the Indo-Pacific.

The Japanese ambassador returned to Tokyo at the weekend after spending nearly 2½ years in Australia.

During his term, he was accused of being too vocal on China but defended his legacy and outspoken style when he sat down with The West Australian, saying he spent his time in Canberra “to the fullest”.

Mr Yamagami said his country was interested in becoming the sixth member of Five Eyes — an intelligence-sharing relationship between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the US and the UK.

He said Japan already enjoyed high levels of co-operation with the five countries and argued these had strengthened in the face of China’s growing military and cyber capabilities.

“Intelligence co-operation is getting more and more important year after year as the security environment in this region is deteriorating,” Mr Yamagami said.

“We have a lot to offer to our friends in the Five Eyes because Japan has been standing on the frontline of strategic challenges facing this region over a number of centuries. By comparing notes between us, I think we can mutually benefit.”

DEFENCE BOOST

The departed diplomat said Australia needed to “hasten its pace” over China as the superpower posed a threat to the region, however, he welcomed the Federal Government’s release of the Defence Strategic Review last week.

The review noted Australia’s military will be significantly reshaped to deal with the risks the nation faces from Beijing.

“We count on deterrence. Australia is working hard to enhance it. Japan is doing the same. We don’t have the luxury to sit back and relax. We have to roll up our sleeves and work hard,” Mr Yamagami said.

While he praised Premier Mark Gowan for trying to strengthen diplomatic ties during a trip to China last month, he argued trade and defence were two domains that couldn’t be separated.

“I’d like to emphasise the importance of strategic implications of trade and investment. I think the past few years have taught us, not only Australians but Japanese included, that strategic strategy or geopolitics and trade are not indivisible,” Mr Yamagami said.

“They are closely intertwined. So I think Western Australians are fully aware of the strategic implications of any trade and investment, especially when it comes to such strategically important items as critical minerals.

“If you depend too much on one particular market or one particular import source that will subject your country to be vulnerable to economic coercion.”

His comments echoed those of Foreign Minister Penny Wong last month.

“Strategic competition is operating on several levels. Domains that we might prefer to separate — economic, diplomatic, strategic, military — all interwoven, and all framed by an intense contest of narratives,” Senator Wong told the National Press Club.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779784

File: aeba66f57d0a459⋯.jpg (87.83 KB,1200x814,600:407,Shingo_Yamagami_welcomed_n….jpg)

>>18779781

2/2

GAS WARNING

Australia mustn’t do anything more to make its Japanese business partners think it is quitting gas, Mr Yamagami warned.

It comes after Japanese energy companies, including petroleum giant Inpex, expressed fears Australia was leaning into “energy nationalism” on the back of the Albanese Government’s interventions in the gas market.

This includes a temporary gas price cap and a deal with the Greens to cap pollution from the nation’s biggest emitters.

“(Quitting gas) is the last impression I think Australia would like to convey to Japanese business partners,” Mr Yamagami said.

“I think the nutshell of the issue is we continue to need gas. I think we are looking in the same direction in terms of achieving net zero by 2050 so we are proceeding towards decarbonisation.”

Japan relies on Australia for its energy needs, with 70 per cent of coal, 60 per cent of iron ore and 40 per cent of gas going to its shores.

When asked what he thought could be done to speed up the development of the critical minerals industry, the diplomat said the public sector needed to chip in.

“Massive investment is required, not only from the private sector — it needs assistance from the public sector as well,” he said.

“I think we have a greater success story of developing gas together. This is, I think, a success story between Australia and Japan. We started it back in the 1970s and the 80s and look at how far we have come.”

CANBERRA POSTING

Mr Yamagami moved to Canberra in late 2020 and visited WA six times during his tenure. He said he put “120 per cent” into the job and wished he could have stayed longer.

“There are only two types of ambassadors — ambassadors who are working hard and ambassadors and those who are hardly working. I have been aspiring to belong to the former group,” Mr Yamagami said.

“This is not the end of the story. This is the beginning of a beautiful friendship that I will keep myself engaged in with Japan’s relationship with Australia.”

There was speculation earlier this year he was being recalled to Tokyo early over his criticisms of China.

The normal term for a Japanese ambassador in Australia is two to three years and successor Kazuhiro Suzuki arrives this month.

https://thewest.com.au/politics/federal-politics/five-eyes-departed-japanese-ambassador-flags-ambition-for-nation-to-join-intelligence-alliance-c-10481174

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779820

File: 0a5d5e86fb41b9a⋯.jpg (239.91 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_US_government_is_seeki….jpg)

File: beea5ba15309f2b⋯.jpg (154.04 KB,1240x744,5:3,Daniel_Duggan_s_lawyer_Den….jpg)

>>18729172

Alleged illegal conduct by ASIO could stymie extradition of Daniel Duggan to US on charges of arms trafficking

Former US marines pilot to remain in custody while Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security investigates Australia’s spy agency

Ben Doherty - 1 May 2023

Alleged illegal conduct by Australia’s spy agency could halt a US effort to extradite a former fighter pilot accused of training Chinese military aviators.

Lawyers for Daniel Edmund Duggan, 54, will argue to temporarily stay a request from the US to extradite him to America while Australia’s Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) conducts a formal investigation into the conduct of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) agents in regards to Duggan’s case.

Duggan will spend at least another 86 days in prison before his case comes back to court in July. He has already been incarcerated – much of it in isolation – for 191 days.

“I’m crushed that Dan now faces, at very least, another 86 days in maximum security solitary confinement with no Australian charges, no convictions anywhere, and no history of violence whatsoever,” Duggan’s wife, Saffrine said after Monday’s hearing at Sydney’s Downing Centre local court.

Duggan, a former US marines pilot – now a naturalised Australian – was arrested last October at the request of the US government, which is seeking his extradition on charges of arms trafficking and money laundering more than a decade ago.

The father of six school-age children, Duggan, 54, denies the charges and is fighting his extradition from prison, a process that could take months, even years to resolve.

Speaking outside court on Monday, Duggan’s lawyer Dennis Miralis said a hearing for the stay, set for 25 July, would give his client the chance to protect his rights to a fair hearing.

The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has launched an inquiry into the circumstances of Duggan’s return to Australia from China after the pilot’s legal team lodged a formal complaint. The Inspector-General has already conducted a four-and-a-half month preliminary inquiry.

“The substance of the complaint fundamentally relates to whether or not ASIO has acted illegally or improperly in its dealings with Mr Duggan over an extended period of time,” Miralis said.

Miralis has previously claimed the former pilot was “lured” back to Australia and then arrested.

Barrister Trent Glover, representing the US, confirmed in court the IGIS inquiry related to “an allegation the ASIO lured Mr Duggan back to Australia to facilitate his arrest”.

Few details of the exact allegations against Duggan have been made in an Australian court.

Glover told Sydney’s Downing Centre local court on Monday the Australian government had filed submissions regarding Duggan’s case to the court.

“There is no confidentiality about those submissions, they can be made available to the media,” he told magistrate Margaret Quinn.

However the court refused the Guardian, and other media outlets, access to the submissions.

The US alleges Duggan trained Chinese fighter pilots to land fighter jets on aircraft carriers, in defiance of arms trafficking laws, and engaged in a conspiracy to launder money. Those claims have not been tested in court.

Duggan served more than a decade flying in the US Marine Corps, rising to the rank of major and working as a military tactical flight instructor.

He left the marines in 2002 and moved to Australia. He became an Australian citizen on Australia Day 2012, and renounced his US citizenship in 2017.

A 2017 US grand jury indictment, unsealed last December, alleges Duggan received at least A$116,000 (US$81,000) in payments in 2011 and 2012 for his work training Chinese fighter pilots at a test flight academy “based in South Africa, with a presence in the People’s Republic of China”.

The indictment alleges Duggan “provided military training to People’s Republic of China military pilots … and instruction on the tactics, techniques and procedures associated with launching aircraft from, and landing aircraft on, a naval aircraft carrier”.

Duggan strenuously rejects all charges against him as being politically motivated, and the indictment full of “half-truths, falsehoods and gross embellishments”. His lawyers have argued the request for his extradition is politically motivated – catalysed by the US’s deepening geopolitical contest with China – and invalid under Australia’s extradition treaty with the US.

Australia’s extradition treaty with the US states that extradition must be refused if the alleged offence is of a “political character”. The principle of dual, or double, criminality also applies: the alleged offences must be a crime in both countries.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/01/alleged-conduct-by-asio-could-stymie-extradition-of-daniel-duggan-to-us-on-charges-of-arms-trafficking

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779870

File: f34d0943623528c⋯.jpg (82.69 KB,1023x767,1023:767,David_Koch_wore_lipstick_o….jpg)

File: d2874462c5e52c9⋯.jpg (163.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Koch_interviewed_Jett_Kenn….jpg)

File: eb807696713d586⋯.jpg (168.04 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Jett_Kenny_centre_with_mum….jpg)

File: 9d5e3386b15b6b3⋯.mp4 (9.89 MB,320x568,40:71,Model_and_ironman_Jett_Ken….mp4)

File: 21c30751a7959e8⋯.mp4 (3.98 MB,1080x720,3:2,340012726_237221545442293_….mp4)

Why David Koch wore lipstick live on air on Sunrise

Breakfast TV host David Koch rocked some bright red lipstick on air this morning during an interview – and it was all for a good cause.

Christine Estera - May 1, 2023

David Koch wore bright red lipstick on Sunrise this morning – all for a good cause.

The breakfast TV host – affectionately nicknamed Kochie – rocked the striking colour while interviewing model Jett Kenny, the son of ironman champion Grant Kenny and former Olympian Lisa Curry.

When he and his family suffered unimaginable loss three years ago when his sister, Jaimi Kenny, died from mental health issues, Jett vowed to raise awareness and funding for the cause.

Now, on May 11, his dream turns to reality as he becomes the inaugural ambassador for the Lip-Stick It campaign – an initiative encouraging Aussie men to wear lipstick on the day to help raise funds for women’s mental health support services.

“I was trying to [apply lipstick] the other day and it is quite difficult. I might look like the Joker while I do this,” Jett told Koch, who replied: “A lot of people think I look like the Joker without the lipstick.”

Jokes aside, Jett said he was proud to kick off the campaign and get behind women in their lives to show they are cared for.

“If all it takes is to put on some red lipstick and start a conversation, then it’s worth doing,” Jett said. “It’s a big thing, not only for myself but for a lot of people. It could be happening to a person you work with, someone you know, but they you know – might not be talking about it because they don’t feel comfortable to do so.”

It was back in September 2020 that Jaimi died aged just 33. At the time, it was said she passed away from a long battle with an undisclosed illness. But later her family revealed Jaimi had been battling with her mental health for years before her death, which triggered underlying issues such as alcoholism and an eating disorder.

“Less than half of the women experiencing mental health are seeking help,” Jett said on Sunrise.

“Encouraging those people to just talk about it and having the strength that they might need to voice what they are going through. I think that was the biggest thing I found was they were so reserved, or she was so reserved talking about her issues and her struggles.

“I’ll never understand what she was going through, I’ll never understand what anyone else was going through because I won’t be in their shoes, I assume each case of mental health issues are specific to each individual but the thing I want to encourage is if you are struggling with any sort of mental health issue is to just speak about it.”

When Jaimi died three years ago, Jett also shared a deeply personal tribute on Instagram.

“I may not have been the best brother to you all the time, I know you thought you weren’t being the big sister I needed all the time, but I do know we loved one another unconditionally all the time,” he wrote.

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/morning-shows/why-david-koch-wore-lipstick-live-on-air-on-sunrise/news-story/ebd08492bfa1b9d009cb2dd19e3f5cd0

https://www.instagram.com/p/CFI18vfBEZI/

https://www.instagram.com/p/CqpY87DhC-t/

>Think logically.

>Ask yourself - is this normal?

>Conspiracy?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18779932

File: f6299389c459cfe⋯.jpg (786.68 KB,1742x743,1742:743,JETT_KENNY_S_NEW_ROLE.jpg)

File: d2d64697ca2475a⋯.mp4 (7.97 MB,960x540,16:9,344730831_2085317255008073….mp4)

>>18779870

Sunrise Facebook Post

1 May 2023

Kochie joined Jett Kenny in wearing red lipstick as part of a new campaign to raise awareness for women's mental health issues.

MORE: 7news.link/JettKenny

https://www.facebook.com/Sunrise/videos/621659316672474/

https://7news.com.au/video/lifestyle/lisa-currys-son-jett-launches-mental-health-campaign-in-memory-of-sister-jami-bc-6326536294112

https://www.lipstickit.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784833

File: 432ed21a9ff40b4⋯.jpg (91.32 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Liberal_MP_Julian_Leeser.jpg)

File: caea0981003ec74⋯.jpg (271.94 KB,1280x1286,640:643,WHERE_LIBERAL_BACKBENCHERS….jpg)

>>18676743

Splinter group emerges among Liberals refusing to reveal how they will vote in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum

RHIANNON DOWN - MAY 2, 2023

A splinter group of Liberal MPs is refusing to declare its position on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, with five confirming they will not participate in either the Yes or the No campaign.

In a sign of deepening division in the party, analysis by The Australian reveals at least 10 per cent of Liberal backbenchers, shadow ministers and shadow assistant ministers will abstain from the referendum campaign trail, while 12 per cent are refusing to say how they’ll vote on polling day.

It follows deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley and several of her shadow cabinet colleagues remaining coy on how they’ll campaign, despite Peter Dutton vowing to actively work against the government’s voice to enshrine an Indigenous voice in the constitution.

The Liberal backbenchers, shadow ministers and shadow assistant ministers who will be missing from the campaign trail include Tasmanian MP Gavin Pearce, South Australian MP Rowan Ramsey, and Queensland MPs Warren Entsch, Angie Bell and Karen Andrews.

Mr Pearce confirmed he would not actively advocate for either the Yes or the No side at this stage, though he held concerns about the proposed wording reintroducing a “notion of race” into the constitution.

“I’m disappointed with the assertion that I am sitting on the fence with this issue,” he said.

“I’m on the record as saying that I will not be party to shaming or guilting people into feeling a certain way – that’s un-Australian. I believe fundamentally in the democratic process and the individual’s right to make their own decision.”

A further six Liberal MPs are not wedded to the party’s No stance, saying they were still undecided on how they would vote at the referendum because they are waiting for the parliamentary inquiry into the voice to deliver its findings, or consulting with their electorates before declaring a position.

One of the undecideds, NSW Senator Andrew Bragg, who is due to establish a Liberals for Yes campaign, has previously expressed support for the voice but told The Australian he was waiting for the inquiry to conclude before he declares his final stance.

A total of 28 confirmed they would be voting No, which is 57 per cent of the 49 Liberal MPs who aren’t in shadow cabinet, and a further 13 (26 per cent) declined to answer, leaving Liberal MPs Julian Leeser and Bridget Archer as the outliers on the Yes side.

Despite the strong inclination towards the No side, significantly fewer among the Liberal ranks were prepared to say they would be campaigning against the voice with just 13 Liberals outside the shadow cabinet confirming they will be on the hustings for the No campaign. This group includes Queensland senators James McGrath and Paul Scarr.

Senator Scarr said his decision was driven by his concerns about inserting a race-based chapter into the constitution, which he described as a “radical departure from equal civic rights”, confirming that he would be entering the fray in the No campaign.

“I believe I have a moral obligation to campaign shoulder-to-shoulder with my colleagues Senators Nampijinpa Price and Senator Liddle whose contributions to this debate, based on their own experiences and perspectives, have been outstanding,” he said. “I have deep and abiding respect for their positions.”

But Senator Liddle hasn’t confirmed she will be campaigning, saying that she remained focused on her role as a member of the Joint Select Committee on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice Referendum.

Many among the Liberal ranks who said they would vote No indicated they were open to changing their stance if their concerns about the legal ramifications of the voice were addressed, including Victorian senator David Van.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/splinter-group-withholding-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-position-emerges-among-liberals/news-story/7c3c8766ece59363a5faec670c7ab91e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784850

File: 8df0bec4343ae80⋯.jpg (152.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australian_captain_Pat_Cum….jpg)

File: 15e761956202ab9⋯.jpg (104.45 KB,1280x720,16:9,Pat_Cummins_will_be_among_….jpg)

File: 729d8d34c3db5d4⋯.jpg (94.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Meg_Lanning_will_be_among_….jpg)

>>18676743

Cricket Australia set to brief Pat Cummins, Meg Lanning and other senior stars ahead of ‘The Voice’ referendum

BEN HORNE - MAY 1, 2023

Pat Cummins, Meg Lanning and other senior Australian cricketers are set to be given a special briefing about The Voice before they head off for the Ashes.

Cricket Australia plans to come out publicly with a position on The Voice in the coming weeks and wishes to consult with its stars beforehand and provide an opportunity for players to ask questions.

Australia is sending an indigenous men’s and women’s team to Vanuatu on Tuesday for a Twenty20 tour where a session educating young Aboriginal players about the upcoming referendum is also planned.

Cricket staff from around the country have already taken part in the briefing and sources say its purpose is to educate players and employees on what The Voice and the Uluru Statement of the Heart actually is, rather than instructing on how to vote.

Cricket has a curious and complicated connection with indigenous culture, and despite all the investment poured into pathways in recent years, the game can’t escape the sad fact only two Australian men’s Test cricketers and two female Test cricketers have been Aboriginal in over 140 years.

One of those greats, Aunty Faith Thomas who played a Test for Australia in the late 1950s and was one of the most significant pioneers in the history of indigenous cricket, will be commemorated by the Australian teams playing four games each against Vanuatu’s national teams, all to be aired on Cricket Australia’s YouTube channel from later this week.

Women’s indigenous captain and Australian international Hannah Darlington, praised CA for their work in educating players in regards to The Voice and Aboriginal matters.

“I know CA is continuing to have conversations around the referendum and make sure they’re educational conversations. I think that’s going to be something we’re going to be taking part in as a group,” Darlington said.

“CA is pretty good in terms of understanding where this group (men’s and women’s indigenous teams) is at in terms of age and youth and I think education is going to be the most important part.

“The main thing for CA and the players within is the fact we’ve had such a great relationship between cricket and First Nations’ people due to the Australian indigenous 1868 tour and then the commemoration indigenous tour in 2018 which took place.

“We love the impact we get to make in cricket as a positive one and we’re looking at how we can continue to do that, whether it’s through The Voice, whether it’s the work we keep doing through the NICC (National indigenous Cricket Council).

“Cricket is in a pretty unique space and those conversations are going to be based around what cricket can do as a whole but probably more, we want to join that conversation in terms of what sport can do as a whole.”

Darlington is a four-time Australian representative with a huge international future ahead of her, but is embracing the opportunity to go on an indigenous tour of Vanuatu as a 21-year-old captain and experienced leader.

“I didn’t think I’d be one of the older girls in a squad just yet. Any time you get to represent your culture, it’s pretty special. When we get to come together and tour internationally, it brings a lot of connection. Sitting down, being able to talk about your mob and the questions you get to ask the people around you then creates a much more connected group in terms of, you’re all playing for the same reason, and that’s for your culture.”

Vanuatu has 25,000 cricketers among its 300,000 population and the Australian teams are motivated to help drive development in the small but dedicated cricketing nation.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/cricket/cricket-australia-set-to-brief-pat-cummins-meg-lanning-and-other-senior-stars-ahead-of-the-voice-referendum/news-story/27521bcc3d124115af6344360efc2ec0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784863

File: 49540a88e1360de⋯.jpg (302.94 KB,1240x744,5:3,A_residence_in_the_Indigen….jpg)

>>18687374

‘We need help’: Northern Territory community racked by violence as residents claim government has abandoned them

Sarah Collard - May 2023

Residents of the remote Northern Territory community of Peppimenarti say they have been forced to flee their homes or endure violence, including stabbings and sexual assaults, amid claims the government has abandoned them.

Last week’s planned visit from the NT police minister, Kate Wordern, to discuss the ongoing problems in the community was cancelled when her private plane had to be diverted due to unrest.

About 200 people live Peppimenarti, six hours’ drive south of Darwin. Residents are increasingly fearful of violence, and lawyers recently took a claim of racial discrimination to the Australian Human Rights Commission over a lack of police resources in the remote Indigenous community.

The chief executive of Deewin Kirim Aboriginal corporation, Ray Whear, said many in the community were living in fear, and the situation had deteriorated over the past four years.

“I’ve had all my staff leave. I can’t get any staff to work.

“I’ve got one lady that will come in and work as a fly-in, fly-out [worker]. But even last week she wouldn’t even stay. It got too dangerous,” Whear said, claiming his home and vehicle were broken into and he was stabbed by an intruder.

“I didn’t even bother to report it, police haven’t been doing anything.”

“This sort of thing has been happening continuously since 2021. It gets super bad or somebody gets killed or severely injured, or shot, a Territory response group comes in for four or five days and things sort of go quiet for a bit and then it goes on,” he told the Guardian.

Whear, who has lived in the community since 2018, said it was grappling with complex issues, including concerns about gangs and a lack of social support.

He described a recent incident where one woman was severely beaten over two days, choked and strangled multiple times and left with broken ribs, severe bruising and trauma but due to the situation was unable to be airlifted for treatment until the next day.

“They [the police] have never asked me for CCTV [of] the violent incidents. They’ve never asked for video, there’s been sexual assaults on staff; name a crime and it has happened.”

He said another woman was sexually assaulted and was taken to another community for assistance before being airlifted to Darwin for medical treatment, but she was not properly supported and claimed she was left alone and was so afraid that she hid in the scrub.

“She was violently beaten …. She was raped, sexually assaulted.” He said Careflight would not land there due to safety concerns.

“Sexual support services were supposed to meet her at the plane but nobody did. She was left there alone … and then went [and] hid in the bush because she didn’t know what to do. Detectives and the service didn’t find her until the next day.”

He said the community was in crisis and in urgent need of support. He urged the NT government to send in more resources.

“We need further assistance … I am almost 100% positive that the community would support federal policing assistance.”

“There’s violent attacks on men, the women, the houses. Burning of people’s cars, trashing of their houses. One lady has between 20 and 30 family living in her house because they are too afraid to live in their own house, in a community.”

Stewart Levitt, a lawyer who is representing the community in the AHRC case, said the community was being treated differently than mostly non-Indigenous communities.

“One has to suspect that there may be some racial element to it because you wouldn’t imagine they would allow suburbs of Alice Springs, or Darwin to be shut down like this. This wouldn’t be able to happen anywhere else.”

He is calling for federal assistance from the Australian defence force or the Australian federal police.

“It’s to protect the people, because the fact is that when the police minister can’t get into a town in their own territory, because planes won’t fly because of civil disorder, what does that say about the territory government?”

The NT government did not respond to questions asking if it was considering requesting further assistance from federal authorities. A government spokesperson said police maintained an “ongoing presence” and that increased resources are provided when required.

The spokesperson said there were complex challenges, including adequate accommodation and facilities, and that a new police complex was being planned to meet community needs..

NT police have been contacted for comment.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/02/we-need-help-northern-territory-community-wracked-by-violence-as-residents-claim-government-has-abandoned-them

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784890

File: 4f455f115fd3de9⋯.jpg (105.03 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chef_best_selling_author_p….jpg)

File: 28344641660cc50⋯.jpg (123.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Zonfrillo_with_fellow_Mast….jpg)

File: 3931c67303aef38⋯.jpg (198 KB,1079x1079,1:1,A_post_from_Jock_Zonfrillo….jpg)

File: d00eb9a30ad81b1⋯.jpg (838.62 KB,795x1614,265:538,Jock_Zonfrillo_1976_2023.jpg)

Network Ten MasterChef judge Jock Zonfrillo dead at age 46

SOPHIE ELSWORTH and ANGELICA SNOWDEN - MAY 2, 2023

Days before his death, Jock Zonfrillo filled his social media accounts with videos sharing his cooking secrets as he prepared pancakes, pasta dishes and homemade pickles.

In a recent Facebook post, the 46-year-old MasterChef judge is smiling as he chops up garlic alongside young son Alfie, turning to him to say “What are you doing? You can’t eat the garlic, you silly billy.”

Yet on Monday afternoon his accounts shared news of his shock death to his hundreds of thousands of followers.

The Scottish-born chef was found dead at a hotel apartment in Melbourne’s inner north at 2am on Monday after police were called to the Lygon Street, Carlton, address for a welfare check.

His death is not being treated as suspicious.

Network Ten announced his death in a statement, saying the show’s 15th season – which had been due to start on Monday – would not air this week.

“Network 10 and Endemol Shine Australia are deeply shocked and saddened at the sudden loss of Jock Zonfrillo, a beloved member of the MasterChef Australia family,” the statement said.

“Jock was known to Australians as a chef, best-selling author, philanthropist and MasterChef judge but he will be best remembered as a loving father, husband, brother and son.”

Zonfrillo was named a Master­Chef judge in 2019 and was due to have a day full of publicity commitments on Monday ahead of the show’s season launch.

His family said they had “completely shattered hearts”.

“Without knowing how we can possibly move through life without him, we are devastated to share that Jock passed away yesterday,” a statement said.

“So many words can describe him, so many stories can be told, but at this time we’re too overwhelmed to put them into words.

“For those who crossed his path, became his mate, or were lucky enough to be his family, keep this proud Scot in your hearts when you have your next whisky.”

Celebrity chefs Gordon Ramsay and Nigella Lawson were among those to pay tribute to him.

“Saddened by the devastating news of Jock Zonfrillo’s passing. I truly enjoyed the time we spent together on MasterChef in Australia,” Ramsay tweeted.

Lawson wrote on her Instagram account: “My deepest, deepest sympathies and much love to Jock’s family and friends. How devastating. How unbearable. My heart goes out to you.”

Zonfrillo had previously spoken of his battle with drugs, including being a heroin addict at as a teenager. “We were smoking pot behind the bike sheds at 12, we were crumbling up ecstasy tablets and speed and taking them at school … and smoking heroin at 15, 16 when I was an apprentice,” he said in a 2021 TV interview.

His career was not without controversy. His Adelaide business Orana went into voluntary administration in 2020 and he owed millions of dollars in unpaid debts. In 2002, he also set fire to apprentice chef Martin Krammer for failing to work quickly enough at Sydney restaurant Forty One.

The Melbourne-based chef hosted MasterChef alongside Melissa Leong and Andy Allen.

Leong had posted a selfie to ­Instagram hours ahead of the now postponed launch of the TV show and before learning of her co-star’s death.

Zonfrillo is survived by his wife, Lauren Fried, who was in Italy when he died, and his four children.

He has two children with Lauren, son Alfie and daughter Isla, and two children from his first two marriages, Ava and Sophia.

Paramount Australia and New Zealand executive vice-president Beverley McGarvey described the news as a “terribly sad day for Jock’s family and friends, his Network 10 and Endemol Shine Australia colleagues and for MasterChef fans around Australia and the world”.

“Jock was an extraordinary man,” she said. “He was a wonderful colleague and friend (but) nothing brought him more joy or happiness than his family. Our thoughts are with them.”

If you are experiencing mental health issues contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or BeyondBlue 1300 224 636. If it is an emergency please call 000.

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/network-ten-masterchef-judge-jock-zonfrillo-dead-at-age-46/news-story/c4c0619675da0315cb748f607e3c7481

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784903

File: 8fabc5cf13d494f⋯.jpg (157.83 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Keith_Hartley_the_second_A….jpg)

File: 935fa7a92315a5a⋯.jpg (98.54 KB,600x419,600:419,C919_Test_Crew.jpg)

>>18766087

Australian police searched pilot's home for China fighter jet records

Kirsty Needham - May 2, 2023

SYDNEY, May 2 (Reuters) - Australian police searched the home of a British former test pilot for documents related to China's J-16 strike fighter, Australia's intelligence partners, and China's biggest aviation company, a court judgment shows.

The search in November was part of an investigation into Western military pilots training China's military at a time of growing tension between China and the United States and its allies.

Britain and Australia have announced crackdowns on former military pilots working to train Chinese fliers, and Britain vowed to change its national security law to stop them working for intermediaries including a South African flying school, which was alleged to be helping China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) recruit pilots.

Keith Hartley, chief operating officer of the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), has not been charged.

He challenged the validity of the search warrant in Australia's Federal Court, questioning its wording and seeking the return of seized material.

The court rejected his application on April 28 and released its judgment, which sheds new light on the investigation into the South African flying school, which has a partnership with China's state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) to train Chinese pilots in South Africa, and had employed several Western pilots with military backgrounds.

Federal police searched Hartley's home on suspicion he had broken the law by providing military style training directed or funded by China between 2018 and 2022, the Federal Court heard.

The search warrant sought evidence to support an Australian police investigation into Hartley, who was suspected of organising or facilitating the training delivered by the flight school "to PLA pilots in regard to military aircraft platforms and military doctrine, tactics and strategy".

Hartley's lawyer, Dennis Miralis, told Reuters he was reviewing the court decision and seeking specialist legal advice on whether to appeal.

"Keith Hartley and TFASA deny any criminal wrongdoing in this matter," he said in a statement.

The judgement shows police had searched for documents and digital records including emails and encrypted messages relating to TFASA, the PLA, four models of PLA fighter jets and fighter training aircraft including the J-16 strike fighter and J-11 fighter, AVIC and two individuals whose names were redacted.

Police also searched for references to Australia's Five Eyes intelligence partners New Zealand, Canada, United States and Britain, as well as NATO and Australia's air force, the judgement shows.

In her judgement, Justice Wendy Abraham wrote that the nature of the alleged offence would have been clear to Hartley when he read the warrant, and police didn't need to provide details of how the PLA were alleged to have directed or funded the training.

"The applicant has not established that the warrant is invalid. It states conduct capable of constituting an offence, and it does so with a reasonable degree of precision," she wrote.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australian-police-searched-pilots-home-china-fighter-jet-records-2023-05-02/

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2023/2023fca0368

https://www.tfasa.com/test-pilot-and-flight-test-engineer-training

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784911

File: d56681fe4a5fdf7⋯.jpg (125.01 KB,1280x721,1280:721,The_Law_Council_of_Austral….jpg)

>>18723461

Spies seeking new defences for phone bugging and hacking

RHIANNON DOWN - MAY 2, 2023

The Law Council of Australia has criticised proposed reforms to the national security legislation that will give spies extraordinary protections to interfere with facilities and modify telecommunications devices, saying the new laws need to be “reasonable, necessary and proportionate”.

The amendment bill, which is currently being considered by the parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security, will grant intelligence agents legal defences to break into a target’s computer, track the geolocation of mobile devices and intercept messages and phone calls without a warrant.

The proposed changes will also broaden the definition of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation officers to include affiliates, such as other intelligence community partners or contractors, with no clear definition of how broadly the term would be applied.

ASIO said the proposed changes were necessary because they would allow spies to identify and locate “subjects of interest”, monitor their “personal footprint” and “undertake necessary activity” while making sure that operations did not unnecessarily impact bystanders, in a submission to an inquiry into the bill.

However, Law Council of Australia president Luke Murphy said the proposed amendments – which come two years after a sweeping review of the legal framework of the national intelligence community conducted by former ASIO chief Dennis Richardson was handed down – went beyond the scope of the recommendations. “The Law Council is concerned that this aspect of the bill goes beyond the scope of the recommendations in the Richardson review, fails to achieve certainty, and may have the unintended consequence of entrenching a deficient standard of detail in ministerial directions,” he said.

“The Law Council is not satisfied by the quality of the justification provided by the explanatory memorandum … The human rights implications of these proposed amendments are also not adequately explained in the statement of compatibility.”

Mr Murphy said the broadening of the language to provide protection to ASIO affiliates could include other law enforcement agencies such as the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, noting the legislation needed to balance national security concerns with basic freedoms.

“In principle, the Law Council recognises that National Intelligence Committee agencies must be well-equipped to face national security threats and the government has a primary responsibility to protect the life and security of the person,” Mr Murphy said.

“However, in order to preserve the values that underpin our democratic society, Australia’s laws must be reasonable, necessary and proportionate to achieve a legitimate objective.”

University of Queensland legal expert Brendan Walker-Munro was not against the proposed changes but said the new protections should be narrowly targeted.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/spies-seeking-new-defences-for-phone-bugging-and-hacking/news-story/83c55c779f8dbd8d09c065041a029861

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784922

File: 58a43e382f9d933⋯.jpg (162.46 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australian_Army_Private_Et….jpg)

Papua New Guinea backs an Albanese government push to embed Pacific island troops in Australian Defence Force

BEN PACKHAM - MAY 1, 2023

1/2

Papua New Guinea is backing an Albanese government push to embed Pacific island troops in the Australian Defence Force, opening the way for a new era of ­regional military co-operation to counter rising strategic threats.

PNG Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko threw his support ­behind the plan as his country ­prepared to host Anthony Albanese, Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi this month for a meeting of Pacific ­island leaders.

The US President will use the May 22 meeting in Port Moresby – two days before the Quad leaders’ summit in Sydney – to stamp his authority on America’s renewed commitment to the region, as his administration pushes back against rising Chinese influence.

Defence Minister Richard Marles is determined to achieve unprecedented co-operation with Pacific islands’ security forces as he works to transform the ADF into a more lethal, more agile force that can project power deep into the region.

Mr Tkatchenko said hundreds of PNG Defence Force personnel could rotate through the ADF for extended periods “to train and to build up the professionalism of our forces”. “I think it’s a great idea to have our soldiers participate and get ­experience and knowledge by being part of the Australian ­Defence Force and working together as one,” he said.

The plan has been put to Pacific nations as a way to strengthen training and provide a “family first” response to regional security and disaster-relief missions.

PNG’s endorsement of the proposal comes as the Albanese government sets aside $400m for retention bonuses to help expand the nation’s military by 18,500 personnel over the next two decades.

Permanent ADF members will be able to receive a $50,000 bonus near the completion of their initial period of service if they commit to serve for another three years.

The government hopes 3400 personnel will take up the bonus within the first three years of the scheme. A $2m review of defence housing will also be undertaken in an effort to bolster home ownership for ADF members.

The government identified ­recruitment and retention as a top priority in its response to last week’s defence strategic review, but faces an uphill battle amid tight employment conditions.

“Without creative and flexible responses, the workforce situation in Defence will continue to deteriorate,” the review warned.

Australia is also bolstering ties in Southeast Asia, with Singapore’s Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen revealing on Monday that navy’s future ­nuclear submarines will be welcome to visit his country’s ports.

After a meeting between the nations’ defence, foreign and trade ministers in Canberra, Dr Ng Eng Hen said the submarines would add to “regional security in ASEAN and beyond”, and flagged more joint military exercises ­between the countries.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784927

File: d4773cf065e3f22⋯.jpg (90.61 KB,1024x768,4:3,PNG_Foreign_Minister_Justi….jpg)

>>18784922

2/2

Mr Biden’s decision to visit PNG for talks with Pacific leaders on the way to Australia from the G7 in Japan follows his agreement late last year with 14 island leaders to strengthen security, climate change and economic co-operation. The move came amid alarm in Washington and Canberra over China’s security agreement with Solomon Islands.

The Australian last year ­revealed Mr Marles had offered unprecedented defence support to Pacific island countries, including the potential to integrate their military forces with Australia’s to undertake regional security and natural disaster response missions. The plan is not yet ready to be included in a new Australia-PNG defence treaty due to be ­finalised next month, but Mr Tkatchenko said PNG was keen to pursue the option.

“I think it is a good positive step forward,” he said. “People-to-people relationships and working together in one region I think are very important.”

Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior fellow Anthony Bergin said the ADF could benefit greatly from embedded Pacific personnel as it focused more closely on operating in the island chains to the nation’s north. “The islanders will bring a cultural awareness that will be really valuable on deployments,” he said.

Mr Bergin said, in the longer term, Australia should seek to recruit Pacific personnel directly into the ADF by offering a pathway to citizenship.

Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said Australia’s Five Eyes partners – the US, Britain, New Zealand and Canada – already provided a “natural ­recruiting pool” for the ADF, and the nation should have a wider discussion on greater Pacific ­islander participation in Australia’s military. He said that with migration numbers set to surge by 700,000 over the next 12 months, “wouldn't it be good if some of them actually joined up and served our country in the process?”

PNG, Fiji and Tonga are the only three Pacific Island nations with military forces, with PNG’s the largest. Fijians already serve in the British Army, like Nepal’s Gurkhas, in an arrangement dating back generations.

Pacific military officers regularly receive training in Australia while the lower ranks receive training support from the ADF in their own countries through ongoing partnership programs. But regional military personnel have not previously been embedded in the ADF in large numbers.

It is understood PNG and other Pacific nation forces could be invited to Australia’s jungle warfare training school at Tully in Queensland under the closer engagement plan, and be offered the opportunity to deploy with the Australian Defence Force on ­regional exercises and support missions. The plan follows Labor’s election promise to establish an ­Australia-Pacific Defence School to provide training programs for regional security forces.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/papua-new-guinea-backs-an-albanese-government-push-to-embed-pacific-island-troops-in-australian-defence-force/news-story/4df224e4db4a9597209ba7c7ea1c6cb4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784945

File: 7b76ef30b429177⋯.jpg (471.61 KB,825x870,55:58,KR_18.jpg)

File: a991a32032c487d⋯.jpg (379.9 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,FvCVpz3WwAETWzn.jpg)

File: fa95114885c6f44⋯.jpg (335.26 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,FvEmlebaQAEnguO.jpg)

Kevin Rudd AC Tweet

Great to have presented credentials to President Biden. Just got the happy snaps back. President firing on all cylinders (as he was at the White House Correspondents’ dinner). And Therese looks stunning.

https://twitter.com/AmboRudd/status/1652985613900034048

https://twitter.com/jekearsley/status/1653144973209124864

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784952

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Hillsong Church Global Investigation | 7NEWS Spotlight Full Documentary

7NEWS Spotlight

Apr 28, 2023

From Hillsong to Hellsong, shocking new revelations about Brian Houston’s megachurch. Victims speak out in Spotlight’s season return, in this full length documentary.

It was once hailed as one of the most influential religious organisations in the Western World, a global megachurch, preaching a rock’n’roll brand of modern Christianity.

But just as quickly as Hillsong and its controversial leaders became superstars and super powerful, child sex abuse scandals would bring down its founder, Frank Houston, implicate his son, Brian, and dirty the faith’s squeaky-clean image.

Now, in an explosive season return of 7NEWS Spotlight, guest reporter Tom Tilley lifts the lid on shocking new allegations of abuse and corruption that will shake the church to its core.

Tilley, author of the best-selling story of Pentecostal perversion, Speaking in Tongues, partners with investigative journalist Liam Bartlett to track down Hillsong’s disgraced leader, Brian and his wife Bobbie in their new US bolthole, as the couple try to resurrect their personal fortunes and stage their own “second coming”.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgtOSd1IVGA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784957

File: b95d5ce3f7457a7⋯.jpg (554.74 KB,1500x1000,3:2,I_Lost_Two_Of_My_Daughters….jpg)

File: 600a053b7eb562b⋯.jpg (245.16 KB,1770x1181,1770:1181,The_Foster_family_Chrissie….jpg)

We must still stand strong against those who betray our kids

CHRISSIE FOSTER - MAY 1, 2023

1/2

Imagine discovering your 14-year-old child had suffered childhood sexual assaults by the parish priest at primary school; that the previous year of self-destructive behaviour and suicide attempts were a result of those ongoing assaults.

Imagine the rage. Imagine discovering 20 months later that a second child of yours had been sexually assaulted by the same priest, then that the priest had been sexually assaulting children since the 1940s. And that, through many complaints over the years, the hierarchy, bishops and archbishops, knew all about his history of offending but had not stopped him, which led to your children being sexually assaulted almost 50 years later.

We then learned that he was not the only pedophile clergyman of whom they were aware and protected. It caused a group of us parents to rage against the hierarchy for their deception, betrayal and culpability.

Our group spearheaded an effort that, in 1996, was unheard of, unthinkable, unorthodox and unbelieved. Regardless, we gave voice to what the hierarchy didn’t want to hear nor have publicly stated – their own criminal shortcomings, their cover-ups and mind-numbing cruelty.

My husband Anthony and I continued with our opposition to the actions of the hierarchy, their Melbourne Response and other injustices, at every opportunity while also dealing with disasters, heartbreak and tragedies at home. In 1999 our daughter Katie, while intoxicated – her way to forget the assaults – was hit by a car and spent a year in hospital, and still needs 24-hour care. In 2008 our eldest daughter, Emma, took her life after years of depression and drug-taking – her way to forget her abuse. It has been a long, hard and heartbreaking road witnessing the disintegration of my children’s lives.

In 2010 I was compelled to write a book on our experience, our efforts and the reality of pedophilia in the priesthood. Hell on the Way to Heaven was an effort to convince an unbelieving world of the unseen but common crimes committed against children and the damage it caused. To my surprise that book, with the help of our local MLA, Ann Barker, became a catalyst, along with other victims’ efforts, for Victoria’s 2012 Inquiry into the Handling of Child Abuse by Religious and Other Non-Government Organisations.

Later that year the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse was announced.

Bar two or three, Anthony and I attended every session of the Victorian inquiry and many of the Catholic Church case studies investigated by the royal commission.

My new book, Still Standing, is our experience of witnessing the evidence of corruption, arrogance, cover-ups, lies and deception exposed through these two vital inquiries.

We witnessed Melbourne archbishop Denis Hart with a smirk on his face say “Better late than never” to Victorian committee member Georgie Crozier’s incredulous words that it took the church 18 years to apply to Rome for laicisation against the offender priest in question.

In the royal commission we heard evidence of ex-bishop Peter Connors saying to a distressed primary school principal who had just inherited a known (well known to the hierarchy) pedophile parish priest together with a recent victim complaint about the same priest: “Once a pedophile, always a pedophile.” And with these brush-off words, Connors offered no assistance.

Another debased example was ex-vicar general Hilton Deakin testifying that then Melbourne archbishop Sir Frank Little and his curia (assistant auxiliary bishops of Melbourne), including himself, all voted on moving or retiring pedophile priests under the pretence of ill health when in fact it was because of child sex offences.

Often the offenders forced into retiring were given the honorary title of emeritus pastor – bestowing on them status and a higher retirement pension.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784962

File: 7054e345e9d201b⋯.jpg (456.9 KB,3000x1996,750:499,Anthony_and_Christine_Fost….jpg)

>>18784957

2/2

This nation’s two inquiries have resulted in changed laws that have made Australia one of safest countries for children. The rape and sexual assault of children is a worldwide problem especially in the Catholic Church, as other countries are discovering. In Australia, the royal commission found that 61.4 per cent of complaints about religious organisations were against the Catholic Church; the next biggest religious offender was the Anglican Church with 14.8 per cent. Of the 8013 survivors who gave evidence to the royal commission it was found that each child suffered 2.2 years of sexual assaults. It is child sexual slavery on a grand scale.

The Catholic Church had one billion parishioners. I was one. We had no idea of the criminal cover-up orchestrated by our hierarchy – our children were the victim pool. It was the hierarchy of the priesthood and brotherhoods who received the complaints; it was they who failed to report or dismiss pedophile priests; it was they who recirculated offenders, allowing them to reoffend – sometimes, as in our case, for 50 years, causing damage to generations.

In May 2017 the unthinkable happened; Anthony, my beloved husband of 36 years, died suddenly after collapsing from a heart attack and sustaining a catastrophic head injury. He will be forever missed.

Late that year, my co-author Paul Kennedy and I made an ABC documentary called Undeniable to be aired nationally to coincide with the closing ceremony of the royal commission. We interviewed activists who had fought on various fronts to make the royal commission a reality. We needed to show, especially politicians, why the $4bn royal commission was necessary and why it was now necessary to implement its recommendations.

The following year I was asked by then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull to be part of the national apology reference group. We collected opinions from survivors around Australia asking what they would like the prime minister to say in such an apology.

On October 22, 2018, I had the great honour of sitting on the floor of Parliament House in Canberra with Julia Gillard on one side and my daughter Katie on the other to hear the national apology. It hit a spot deep inside many of us, as the broken sobbing of one woman proved when her cries echoed through the parliamentary chamber. The national apology was a triumph for all victims; it was recognition of what victims had suffered as defenceless children at the mercy of bishops, clergy and other heartless people who cared nothing for them. The people who knowingly harboured child rapists were wrong, vile and criminal, and the apology proved it to the nation.

It should never have happened. It should have been stopped. It was necessary to pay respect and admit the truth of the many thousands of child sexual assaults that took place in trusted institutions and the damage and suffering it caused.

The carnage we experienced with our daughters must stop. Public knowledge and understanding are the way forward in the ongoing battle against pedophilia. It is every adult’s duty to be forever vigilant in protecting the children in their lives and beyond.

Chrissie Foster is the author of Hell on the Way to Heaven and Still Standing (Penguin Random House Australia) with Paul Kennedy. She was joint winner of the Australian Human Rights Medal 2018 with royal commissioner Peter McClellan and in 2019 was appointed a Member of the Order of Australia for significant service to children, particularly as an advocate for those who have suffered sexual abuse.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/we-must-still-stand-strong-against-those-who-betray-our-kids/news-story/ff55ae9f650fd6d0aef23085b1c95ed0

https://www.penguin.com.au/books/still-standing-9781761047442

https://www.penguin.com.au/authors/chrissie-foster

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784972

File: 2bebcf5a2cbe102⋯.jpg (2.25 MB,1791x2759,1791:2759,Still_Standing_Chrissie_Fo….jpg)

File: c5fd0f343363a5c⋯.jpg (9.61 MB,3333x5000,3333:5000,Chrissie_Foster.jpg)

>>18784957

Righteous rage - The Catholic Church’s betrayal of children

Still Standing by Chrissie Foster, with Paul Kennedy.

Barney Zwartz, Australian Book Review - May 2023

1/2

This is a book about rage, as Chrissie Foster says in her opening sentence. It is motivated and driven by rage and, if this is not an oxymoron, it is a panegyric to rage.

Few people could have more cause for rage than Foster, two of whose three daughters were raped at primary school in Melbourne by Catholic priest Kevin O’Donnell, a paedophile monster about whom the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne knew for fifty years yet did nothing. One of Chrissie’s daughters, Emma, took her own life, while the second, Katie, who turned to drink to cope, was left in a wheelchair after a car crash.

As religion reporter for The Age, I often sat alongside the Fosters in the 2013 Victorian Parliamentary Inquiry into how institutions responded to child abuse, which they attended throughout. I knew the rage must be smouldering inside – it would be impossible not to be – but I was constantly impressed by their quiet, stoic dignity and the calm, rational way their passion was expressed.

Nor have I ever forgotten Chrissie’s powerful account in her earlier book – also written with Paul Kennedy, Hell on the Way to Heaven (2011) – of the Fosters’ meeting with Archbishop George Pell in 1997. According to her husband, Anthony, who died in 2017, the future cardinal showed a sociopathic lack of empathy. The Fosters were shown into a cramped furniture storage room in the presbytery and given a small wooden bench for both of them to sit on. The only other seat was a throne-like red leather armchair in which Pell stretched out in a way they found intimidating. He told them that if they didn’t like the $50,000 offer under the church’s Melbourne Response abuse protocol they could take the church to court.

The Fosters did, whereupon the Catholic Church denied the rapes, despite their own investigator having confirmed them. The church settled before judgment for $450,000 for Emma plus more in compensation for Katie. Rage? How on earth could it be otherwise?

Paradoxically, there is something dispassionate about Foster’s fury – it is always contained, her criticism is biting but proportionate, and that restraint adds to the intensity.

Still Standing is a scorching but justified excoriation of the Catholic hierarchy in Rome and Australia with a couple of honourable exceptions – the late George Pell, whose supporters always painted him as an unflinching hero of the fight against abuse, not among them. Some may even have believed that Pell championed victims. In fact, as Pell himself admitted, his top priority was protecting the assets and reputation of the Church (both of which causes he ended up damaging), and he offered victims nothing but pro forma and emotionless expressions of regret. The book is the case for the prosecution, and it is powerful and moving, filled with telling details.

Still Standing is far from the first to do this, but part of its power comes from laying bare the devices by which the Catholic hierarchy concealed abuse, moved offenders to different parishes – where they took advantage of the opportunity to ruin hundreds more lives – failed to report abusers to police, deceived parents, bullied and intimidated victims, insisted upon secrecy upon pain of excommunication (including forced non-disclosure agreements), and limited the payouts they made, as well as their complete betrayal of those who should have been seen as most important – all of which has led to revulsion among the Catholic and mainstream communities. Not for nothing has the abuse scandal been seen as the greatest challenge to the Church since the Reformation.

Time and again, Foster exposes church apologies as self-serving and insincere. As she writes of the cover-up, ‘it was deliberate, calculated and clandestine. It was international.’

Pell said before the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse that he objected to Catholics being the only cab on the rank. It is true that child abuse is a crime found in many institutions, but, as the Royal Commission observed, nine out of ten clergy cases reported to them were by Catholic perpetrators.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18784975

File: 7079d4bd665cb8a⋯.jpg (376.18 KB,1359x2000,1359:2000,The_Foster_family_in_Janua….jpg)

>>18784972

2/2

It found, as Foster cites, that 4,444 people came forward between 1980 and 2015 making child sexual abuse allegations (no one can imagine how many victims did not come forward) to ninety-three Catholic Church authorities relating to more than 1,000 Catholic institutions. The average age of victims was ten-and-a-half years for girls, eleven-and-a-half for boys. The worst diocese, statistically, was Sale in Victoria, where fully fifteen per cent of priests were accused of being perpetrators. In terms of Catholic orders, an incredible forty per cent of Brothers of St John of God were accused, followed by Christian Brothers (22%), Salesians of Don Bosco (21.9%) and Marist Brothers (20.4%).

Much of the book is a narrative of the two hugely effective inquiries, the Victorian parliamentary one and the vastly bigger Royal Commission, and the Fosters’ reaction to the Church’s unfolding disgrace. Foster describes the methods of cover-up: secret archives, the ‘mental reservation’ that allows priests to lie under oath, the doctrine of the pontifical secret, victim blaming, euphemisms, destruction of documents, a multitude of ‘I don’t recalls’, and putting as much blame as possible on the dead. Another sad constant is the callous disdain the Fosters met from so many Australian prelates.

Before the Royal Commission reported, Anthony died in May 2017 of a catastrophic brain injury after a fall at Bunnings, another crippling blow for Chrissie. She writes: ‘Anthony was the most patient, intelligent, compassionate and loving man I had ever met. He was the kindest person in the world. The best. He was everything to me. We had been together for thirty-seven years.’

I am glad Foster acknowledges the role of the press in bringing clergy abuse to public attention, leading to the formal inquiries, then reporting them. When I began reporting on this in 2003 – and I was far from the first or most important – the police, the courts, and politicians didn’t really want to know. It was all too hard, and some had even been part of the cover-up. So the emergence of clergy sexual abuse in public consciousness over the next decade highlights how the media can still be a powerful force for good, though our role pales into insignificance against the courage and determination of survivors themselves and people like the Fosters.

Since the Fosters discovered the appalling secret of what happened to their children, their courage and determination has never flagged. As Chrissie Foster writes, ‘It had to be exposed because nobody should suffer as we and others had – there was no choice but to fight and that is what we did, two timid, ordinary people from the suburbs forced into a life beyond any nightmare. But we were good people, who simply could not allow it to continue. So we acted.’

In 2018 Foster received recognition for fighting the good fight when, with Chief Royal Commissioner Peter McClellan, she won the Australian Human Rights Medal.

Three decades after first taking up the cudgels, she is still furious that the high-ranking clergy who enabled and prolonged the sex crimes ‘of adult holy men against the small bodies of children for an average of 2.2 years each child’ have not been held to account. ‘Justice has not yet been served. How can our criminal law allow the Church hierarchy to just walk away from what it heartlessly orchestrated for decades, for centuries?’

It is the bishops (and bureaucrats) who emerge as the worst villains in this story. What could be more shameful or sad; what could more justly inspire rage?

Barney Zwartz worked for The Age for more than thirty-two years until the end of 2013. His roles included chief sub-editor, letters editor, opinion editor and, for the last twelve years, religion editor. He now works as a media adviser, as a senior fellow for the Centre for Public Christianity and as a freelance journalist, writing especially about music. He is married to author Morag Zwartz.

https://www.australianbookreview.com.au/abr-online/current-issue/989-may-2023-no-453/10234-barney-zwartz-reviews-still-standing-by-chrissie-foster-with-paul-kennedy

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0e3a27 No.18789748

Trump and his sons’ necks will meet with a blade.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789757

File: 1601865b12f1fb5⋯.jpg (164.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Scars_of_rejection_will_ru….jpg)

File: 87255ae210f9f06⋯.jpg (445.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

File: 90102fb956c5b95⋯.jpg (86.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,Historian_Henry_Reynolds.jpg)

>>18676743

Scars of rejection will run deep if the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum fails, says historian Henry Reynolds

HENRY REYNOLDS - MAY 3, 2023

1/2

Both sides of the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum launched television campaigns recently and the results of several relevant opinion polls were released.

The Yes campaign continues to hold a handy lead in all states. But there is still a significant block of voters who have not made up their mind. The historical record of referendum campaigns should caution anyone against assuming the result is a foregone conclusion.

But much of the commentary concentrates on the consequences that will unfold in the event of a Yes victory. Little thought seems to be given to how Australia would be affected by a rejection of the voice to parliament. The No campaigners appear to assume that they are proponents of continuity, of the status quo. But that will certainly not be the case.

Defeat will have wide and serious ramifications. If the referendum goes down it will be one of the most consequential events in the fraught history of relations between the First Nations and the wider community. To understand why, it is necessary to go back to the events that preceded the launch of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in May 2017.

The best place to start is a meeting at Kirribilli House in July 2015. Tony Abbott called together a meeting of 40 Indigenous leaders to discuss means by which the First Nations could be recognised in the Constitution. As a result a 16-member referendum council was established five months later to carry the project forward. It had the support of new prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and opposition leader Bill Shorten.

What followed was one of the most intense campaigns to test the opinion of the First Nations communities ever undertaken in our history. Between December 2016 and May 2017, 12 dialogues were conducted in every part of the country. In all, more than 1200 participants were consulted and their reactions recorded and put up online. Sixty per cent of participants were selected from tradi­tional communities, 20 per cent represented relevant organisations and 20 per cent were prominent individuals. Twelve major traditional languages were employed along with translators.

The Statement from the Heart was the distillation of this intense process. It was the result of the deliberations of the 250 delegates at Uluru “coming from all parts of the southern sky”. It was the most representative gathering of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders that had ever been brought together in our history. And it all happened with the blessing of, and with funding provided by, the government and seconded by the opposition. The First Nations had responded to the request of our political leadership to go to all parts of the continent and return with guidance as to ways that the Constitution could be amended.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789758

File: b18df0951782bc3⋯.jpg (208.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Labor_MPs_applaud_the_Cons….jpg)

File: 6d4bee5e842c780⋯.jpg (173.39 KB,1280x720,16:9,Yes_campaigner_and_filmmak….jpg)

>>18789757

2/2

As it turned out, the Indigenous voice to parliament was “the most endorsed singular option for constitutional alteration”. It was seen to provide “reassurance and recognition”. This background helps to explain the profound disappointment that followed Turnbull’s peremptory dismissal of the proposal for the voice in 2017 and followed now by the decision of the federal Coalition to campaign against it. It is a proposal that still has more than 80 per cent support in the Indigenous community.

The scars left from this contemptuous rejection will take a long time to heal. But for the Indigenous leaders of this generation who have sought reconciliation, defeat would be profoundly dispiriting. Having pursued the voice because it would provide their communities “with an active and participatory role in the democratic life of the state”, where would they turn?

Rachel Perkins said recently that defeat in the referendum “would be a blow because it would be seen as a vote against Indigenous people … we’ve endured so much and not to have the country stand with us would be a very significant blow for us, I think.”

If the referendum is lost, a new, younger generation may return to the streets with campaigns of direct action. Others could well conclude that their campaign for self-determination and treaties will gather strength by taking the struggle offshore to Geneva and New York, where they would find that Australia had few friends in the erstwhile colonial world.

Perhaps more to the point is that in recent years international law has greatly strengthened the position of the world’s indigenous minorities. If that is the case Australia will find itself in the situation it experienced in the middle years of the 20th century when our diplomats had to struggle continually to rebut attacks about the White Australia policy and the treatment of Indigenous people.

Our promotion of human rights and our signature to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which we officially endorsed in April 2009, will be used against us. Self-evident hypocrisy will cruel our pitch all over the world.

Henry Reynolds is a historian of Australia’s frontier conflict and the author of more than dozen books.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/scars-of-rejection-will-run-deep-if-voice-fails-says-historian-henry-reynolds/news-story/91b980156ba98c583c9771a0f647a168

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0e3a27 No.18789775

There will be a genocide of American jews. The same mistake will not be made this time. This is their punishment for mossad & Netanyahu.

Fuck you.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789782

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18676743

>>18760676

>>18760683

Indigenous voice to parliament Yes ad campaign is ‘misleading’ claims Advance Australia

SARAH ISON - MAY 3, 2023

The Yes campaign’s video advertisement urging viewers to vote in favour of constitutional recognition of an Indigenous voice to parliament is “misleading”, right-leaning ­activist group Advance Australia has claimed.

In a letter to the Australian Electoral Commission, seen by The Australian, Advance Australia raised concerns with Yes23’s omission of “any reference to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice to parliament”.

“The bill currently before the parliament which will form the referendum question and ultimately, if approved by the voters, change the Constitution is called Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023,” the letter, written by Advance Australia’s executive director Matthew Sheahan, said.

“Yet the Yes23 ad does not mention the voice: an inseparable component of the referendum as articulated, so integral that it is the title of the bill.

“Recognition is inseparable from the voice. In our view, it follows that Yes23 may be intentionally misleading the Aus­tralian public on the nature of the referendum to omit that important fact.”

Mr Sheahan said the advertisement’s claim that a Yes vote at the referendum would give Australians “a real say” was misleading because “there is no guarantee what a future voice will make representations on and how the parliament of the day will respond”.

“To tell the Australian people in this ad that the referendum provides a ‘real say’ improperly implies the parliament does not have the power to regulate the voice and further misleads voters,” he said in the letter.

“The electoral act makes it an offence to print, publish or distribute, or cause, permit or authorise to be printed, published or distributed, any matter or thing during an election period that is likely to mislead or deceive an elector in relation to the casting of a vote.”

He urged the AEC to “conduct an appropriate investigation” and form a view on the matters.

A spokesman for the AEC said the commissioner, Tom Rogers, would respond to Advance Australia “in due course”.

A spokesman for Yes23 welcomed Advance Australia “drawing attention” to its campaign.

The referendum on the voice is set to be held later this year.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-yes-ad-campaign-misleading/news-story/8f99cc238712df42cf3d30e786637169

https://www.advanceaustralia.org.au/

https://yes23.com.au/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEPOU8GEvak

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789803

File: a76cc375cfa909d⋯.jpg (447.19 KB,1080x1350,4:5,FvGCA0zacAEb8l7.jpg)

>>18676743

>>18600210 (pb)

West Coast Eagles join the Collingwood Magpies in supporting Voice to Parliament

Bryant Hevesi - May 2, 2023

The West Coast Eagles have become the latest AFL club to come out in support of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

The Perth-based team issued a statement on Tuesday revealing its backing for the constitutional change that Australians will vote on between October and December.

West Coast's decision was made public about a month after the Collingwood Magpies confirmed its board was in support of the Voice.

The announcement also comes after a memo that had been sent to all 18 league teams calling on clubs to determine a position on the Voice was leaked to the media.

The Eagles said its statement endorsed by its board of directors was put together in consultation with its Reconciliation Action Plan Committee and its Elders in Residence.

Club director Ben Wyatt, who previously represented Labor in the Western Australia parliament and was the nation's first Indigenous treasurer, was also consulted.

The statement referenced how later this year the nation "will face a historic decision on whether to amend our founding document to include the historical connection of our Indigenous family and put their aspirations in our Australian constitution".

"Like many organisations across Australia, the West Coast Eagles have taken this historic opportunity to have an informed and open discussion," the statement continued.

"Over the last 12 months we have engaged in a series of specific educational sessions with our board, staff and players.

"Our Club has also taken advice from our First Nations Elders-in-Residence and our Reconciliation Action Plan Committee.

"The West Coast Eagles supports the First Nations Voice to Parliament being enshrined in the constitution.

"The West Coast Eagles story has been heavily influenced by our great Indigenous players who have represented our club so passionately both on the field and in the community."

The club added it was encouraging "members and supporters, indeed, all Australians, to develop a deep understanding of the Uluru Statement from the Heart".

Yes alliance campaign director Dean Parkin welcomed West Coast's move to publicly back the Voice proposal.

"Today's statement of support from the West Coast Eagles reflects how people and organisations connected to their communities are stepping forward to say Yes to constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people through a Voice to Parliament," he said.

On Monday, it was revealed a memo had been sent by the AFL's General Manager of Inclusion and Social Policy Tanya Hosch encouraging clubs to advise the AFL if they will support the Yes case ahead of the referendum.

"As the AFL will be considering this in the coming weeks, your advice on this will be gratefully received," part of the memo said.

"This information is supplied to provide guidance regarding language to support building awareness of the referendum during Sir Doug Nicholls Round in 2023."

Collingwood in late March issued a statement announcing the club's board supported the Voice as it was part of its "commitment to doing and being better".

The club added that in recent months it had "engaged and provided safe spaces for our players and staff to more deeply understand the conversation" ahead of the vote.

"The board acknowledges and understands that to be better as a country and to enact meaningful change, we need to hear from First Nations peoples; their needs and aspirations," Collingwood's statement continued.

Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price - a Collingwood supporter who opposes the Voice along with federal National Party colleagues - at the time said the club should stick to footy over dabbling in politics.

"Sports codes, clubs, they need to stay the hell out of politics and stick to sport," Senator Price told Sky News Australia host Paul Murray in late March.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reacted to Collingwood's stance by declaring it was "fair" for sports clubs to express their views on the Voice to Parliament

"Of course it's fair for clubs and sporting organisations and faith groups and businesses and any other organisation to put forward their view," Mr Albanese said.

"Because this is about Australia's national interest. This is about doing the right thing by First Nations people, but it's also about who we are as a country.

"And the way that we see ourselves and the way that the world sees us as well, and whether we will walk together."

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/voice-to-parliament/west-coast-eagles-join-the-collingwood-magpies-in-supporting-voice-to-parliament/news-story/d3af56a2ec4ed58ee4155aa0fb28511e

https://twitter.com/WestCoastEagles/status/1653246512502284288

https://www.westcoasteagles.com.au/news/1321257/west-coast-eagles-support-voice-to-parliament

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789832

File: 3285986666842c1⋯.mp4 (12.04 MB,480x480,1:1,9MnNf0JGhaEydhmw_1.mp4)

File: 7e351fbcd203051⋯.jpg (592.88 KB,825x1375,3:5,CC_1.jpg)

File: 8fd524741186b84⋯.jpg (447.51 KB,825x1052,825:1052,VM_3.jpg)

File: 996fc6186aa9e24⋯.jpg (543.57 KB,2042x1545,2042:1545,A_group_of_men_appeared_we….jpg)

File: a3058dcbbc799e2⋯.jpg (2.34 MB,4792x3105,4792:3105,Pro_Russian_troops_in_unif….jpg)

Russian Orthodox choir denounces group of men wearing pro-war Z symbol shirts at Sydney Town Hall event

Isobel Roe - 2 May 2023

A Russian Orthodox choir has distanced itself from a group of men who wore "disgusting" pro-Russia symbols to attend a government-sponsored performance in Sydney.

Several men wearing shirts with the letter Z - a symbol representing support for Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine - gathered at the front of Sydney Town Hall following a performance of the Russian Orthodox Male Choir on Friday night.

The symbol is not banned in Australia.

In a video by self-described "protest livestreamer" known on social media as Chriscoveries, the men are filmed walking down the aisles toward the stage, and standing in a line to face the audience.

One man was also photographed shaking hands with Russian Consul General Igor Arzhaev.

Asked by Chriscoveries in the video why they were there, one man said it was to "support Russia".

As the group made its way down the aisle, an audience member is heard saying, "I don't approve, I totally object".

State government agency Multicultural NSW and the City of Sydney sponsored the event and said the pro-Russian display was not part of the performance.

In a statement to the ABC, the Russian Orthodox Male Choir of Australia said it was not associated with the men.

"The choir condemns this group who sought to sow the seeds of division in an attempt to taint the image of this concert," the statement read.

"The Russian Orthodox Male Choir of Australia is apolitical, and promotes peace, harmony and inclusion.

"We intend to work with partners at future events to ensure similar incidents do not occur."

'Disgusting public display'

Photos and video of the event have been shared in a social media group run by pro-Putin YouTuber Simeon Boikov, known as "Aussie Cossack".

Ukraine's Ambassador to Australia Vasyl Myroshnychenko has condemned the group's attendance as a "disgusting public display".

"Z stands for the Russian aggression in Ukraine, rape and murder," he said in a tweet.

In January Mr Myroshnychenko called for tennis star Novak Djokovic's father to be banned from Australia when he was seen posing with a man wearing the "Z" symbol, following Djokovic's quarterfinal win over Russian Andrey Rublev.

Russian and Belarusian flags were banned from the tournament after a Russian flag was waved during the opening round.

A City of Sydney spokeswoman said Friday night's Sydney Town Hall event was described to council as a performance by Greek, Serbian and Antiochian community choirs in celebration of Orthodox Easter.

Event organisers applied for a grant for free venue hire, which was approved.

"The City of Sydney does not tolerate displays of hate or discrimination anywhere in our city, and we are disappointed that this event, designed to celebrate our diverse communities, was hijacked by a political group," the spokeswoman said.

"We are reviewing what happened and the impact of this event on future bookings with this and other organisations."

Australian anti-Kremlin organisation, Svoboda Alliance, said it had written to the Member for Sydney, Alex Greenwich, expressing "deep concern" about the appearance of Russian aggression symbols at the concert.

It has previously lobbied for the Russian "Z" symbol to be banned, alongside the Nazi swastika.

Joseph La Posta, the chief executive of Multicultural NSW, said he had been assured the Russian Orthodox Male choir had no idea the group was coming.

"I condemn any kind of violence, glorification of violence or symbols of violence," he said.

Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore has apologised to the Ukrainian community.

"We are extremely disappointed, even angry, that this event, designed to celebrate our diverse communities, was hijacked by a political group that promoted Russia's bloody invasion of Ukraine," she said in an Instagram post.

"I am sorry that the weekend's events caused the Ukrainian community additional concern during this trying time."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-02/sydney-russian-orthodox-choir-z-shirt-men-war-ukraine-putin/102290226

https://twitter.com/Chriscoveries/status/1651899668115361794

https://twitter.com/AmbVasyl/status/1652197439494037508

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789864

File: c36f92dc9fc1f85⋯.jpg (4.1 MB,5753x3828,523:348,Men_wearing_Russian_Z_shir….jpg)

File: c5ebf2d26dcc2de⋯.jpg (4.88 MB,6048x4024,756:503,One_of_the_Russian_support….jpg)

File: f6c88e516471fba⋯.jpg (813.01 KB,1666x2222,833:1111,Ambassador_of_Ukraine_to_A….jpg)

>>18789832

How a T-shirt exposed a cultural rift in Sydney

Perry Duffin - May 3, 2023

1/2

Security agencies are being called to investigate a Russian choir concert, sponsored by a NSW government agency, after men wearing shirts supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine put on a show of force at Sydney’s Town Hall building.

The choir is now severing links with ultranationalist groups in Australia.

Men in black shirts, bearing the white “Z” symbol showing support for Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, were pictured walking into the performance on Friday night.

The group of men posed in front of the stage as the crowd took their seats - one voice in the crowd was disgusted, others appeared supportive. One shook hands with the Russian consul-general.

The Russian Orthodox Male Choir, which was once invited to sing in the Kremlin, said it was unaware of the incident. They were frustrated the stunt overshadowed their performance.

“The Russian Orthodox Male Choir of Australia is a peace-loving group who condemn all symbols glorifying violence,” a choir spokesman told the Herald.

“The choir condemns this group who sought to sow the seeds of division in an attempt to taint the image of this concert.”

The Herald can reveal the Z stunt at the concert was linked to Simeon Boikov, a pro-Putin influencer holed up in the Russian consulate trying to escape Australian arrest warrants.

The Z-bearers are Boikov acolytes who have protested alongside him through lockdowns and in favour of Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

“The message of the Easter Concert was one of peace and love, not hatred and fear. We intend to work with partners at future events to ensure similar incidents do not occur,” the choir spokesman said.

A Russian-Australian group, which opposes the invasion of Ukraine, has written to the National Security Hotline calling for an investigation into the Town Hall concert.

“We have learned that many symbols of Russian aggression were demonstrated during this concert,” Svoboda Alliance NSW wrote in the letter.

“Therefore, this concert was not a truly multicultural event… but rather a clear example of propaganda of Putin’s Russia and military aggression against an independent sovereign nation.”

“It deteriorates the cohesion and integrity of Australian society.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789873

File: 2f79996c6dcff23⋯.jpg (546.57 KB,3501x2333,3501:2333,The_Russian_Orthodox_Mens_….jpg)

File: 79a48877c6c8eaa⋯.jpg (248.8 KB,1600x1067,1600:1067,The_Russian_Orthodox_Male_….jpg)

File: adcda012a9300ea⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,3501x2334,3:2,The_Z_symbol_is_in_support….jpg)

>>18789864

2/2

Ukraine’s Ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said on Twitter the Z symbolised Russian “aggression in Ukraine, rape and murder”.

Myroshnychenko told the Herald the Town Hall intrusion was also part of a larger strategy for Russia to re-cast their invasion and gain acceptance in the West.

“Putin figured soft power is appealing to many people, the fascination with Russian culture, music, their Dostoyevskis - it’s a way into important political circles in Western countries,” Myroshnychenko said.

Myroshnychenko said such expressions were very distressing for Ukrainians in Australia and the intrusion would threaten funding for legitimate Russian cultural events.

But it also exposed how ultranationalist Russian groups “weaponised” their culture and church, Myroshnychenko said.

Just a few years ago the choir performed in the Queen Victoria Building at a centenary celebration of the Russian Orthodox Church overseas.

The choristers wore tuxedos; others in the room wore military garb. A banner of Russia’s crest, an eagle with two heads, hung behind them in the stately room in July 2020.

The banner belonged to the Double-Headed Eagle Society, a Russian imperialist and right-wing group, which Boikov helped lead in Australia.

The society is chaired by “Orthodox Oligarch” Konstantin Malofeyev, an alleged financier for pro-Russian rebels who has been sanctioned since the 2014 conflict in Ukraine.

The choir said it was invited to perform at the celebration where it sang folk and spiritual music that dates back to the 1800s.

There is no suggestion the choir, which calls itself apolitical, supported the Double-Headed Eagle Society or its cause.

The choir’s frosty response to the Town Hall stunt suggests the relationship between Russian cultural groups and ultranationalists has grown tense and fraught.

A video, uploaded and deleted by the choir, appeared to show one member rehearsing in a shirt bearing a Z design across the Russian flag. It is sold on Boikov’s website.

The choir insists the singer was unaware the Z was a symbol of Russia’s war.

“When this fact became known, the video was deleted as no member of the choir supports war. All members of the choir pray for world peace,” the spokesman said.

Boikov described the choir’s denouncement as a “betrayal” of Russia.

One of the Town Hall concert sponsors, Multicultural NSW, condemned the show of force at the concert.

“We do not tolerate displays of hate or discrimination anywhere in our city,” CEO Joseph La Posta said in a statement.

“We are disappointed that this event, designed to celebrate diverse communities, was hijacked by a political group.”

Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore echoed the comments - the council hosted the concert.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/how-a-t-shirt-exposed-a-cultural-rift-in-sydney-20230503-p5d575.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789901

File: 8c7697c095ac150⋯.mp4 (14.07 MB,640x360,16:9,King_Charles_meets_Aussie_….mp4)

File: dc5cdd8d1a93e86⋯.jpg (1.89 MB,4403x3184,4403:3184,The_King_greets_Australian….jpg)

Albanese meets King, tells Piers Morgan he will pledge allegiance

Rob Harris - May 3, 2023

London: Anthony Albanese has said he has no issues swearing allegiance to King Charles III during a public oath at this weekend’s historic coronation service and warned republicans that staging a vote on Australia’s future head of state was not imminent.

The Australian prime minister met the King during a private audience at Buckingham Palace in London on Tuesday, in what was described as an “insightful and rewarding” meeting, where he reiterated there was an invitation for the royals to visit Australia next year.

In an interview with controversial broadcaster Piers Morgan on Britain’s TalkTV, Albanese said he was certain that Australia would become a republic “at some stage in the future” but he preferred not to be a prime minister who “presides over just constitutional debates”.

He said his priority remained achieving constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, and it was also possible to be a lifelong republican and still respect institutions.

It is the first time Australians and citizens of other Commonwealth nations will be invited to actively take part during a coronation ceremony and raise “a chorus of millions of voices” supporting “their undoubted King, defender of all”.

Asked if he would accept the invitation from the Archbishop of Westminister, Reverend Justin Welby, during next Saturday’s service, Albanese said he would do what was “entirely appropriate as the representative of Australia”.

“Australians made a choice in 1999,” he said, referring to the referendum result which supported the status quo with 54.87 per cent of the vote. “One of the things that you’ve got to do is to accept a democratic outcome. So, we made that choice. And I will certainly engage in that spirit as I have, as I have done 10 times as an MP.”

Leaders of the Australian push to ditch the monarchy said on Tuesday they wanted the prime minister to remain silent when guests at the coronation are invited to pledge allegiance to the new monarch.

Albanese said he believed Australia should have an Australian as its own head of state but also believed there was not yet a groundswell of grassroots support for the change and addressing climate change, improving Australia’s economy and further engaging in the Indo-Pacific was more important.

“A demand for another vote isn’t something that can be imposed from the top because it won’t be successful,” he said. “When that demand is there. I’m sure a vote will be held… I don’t see it as being imminent.”

In an expansive interview that lasted almost 50 minutes, Albanese said he was concerned about creeping “cancel culture”, referring to the treatment of the late Australian actor and performer Barry Humphries by the Melbourne Comedy Festival.

He confirmed there would be a state funeral, co-hosted by the NSW, Victorian and federal governments because he was someone who had given “an enormous amount of pleasure to generations of Australians”.

“ I think that we’ve got to be able to laugh at ourselves,” Albanese said. “But a bit like rewriting some books. It is what it is at the time.

“That’s the context and I think that the idea of cancel culture is, in my view, a sad development because you often can get, as well, the pile on of social media. And you see happen so often and things quite often too are taken out of context.”

Albanese said he believed Joe Biden’s age should not stop him from seeking a second term as United States President, saying he was doing a “fantastic job”, and declined to answer whether he would be able to deal with Donald Trump should he return to the White House after the next election.

“The United States is a relationship between countries and between peoples, based upon our common democratic values,” he said.

Albanese will visit the BAE Systems shipyard at Barrow-in-Furness in north-west England on Wednesday, where the first AUKUS program submarine is due to be built.

He said had a “busy agenda” during his five-day visit to Britain, which includes a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, discussions on the Australia-UK free trade agreement and meetings with “other world leaders to strengthen Australia’s relationships around the world”.

Albanese also announced the Australian government would make a national contribution of $10,000 to Western Australian charity Friends of the Western Ground Parrot in honour of The King’s Coronation.

The funds will go towards the conservation of the Western Ground Parrot, a rare and critically endangered bird that is shy and rarely seen, in the remote Cape Arid National Park and Nuytsland Nature Reserve, to the east of Esperance.

https :// www .the age. com. au /politics /federal /albanese -meets -king -tells- piers- morgan- he -will- pledge- allegiance- 202 30503- p5d 53v. html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789935

File: 799389dc6d0c6bc⋯.mp4 (13.29 MB,640x360,16:9,J0txF_H3a4L_DvDL.mp4)

>>18789901

‘What a stuttering mess’: Albanese’s response to controversial question slammed by trans-activists

Anthony Albanese has come under fire for his response to a controversial question raised in an interview with talk-show host Piers Morgan.

Rebecca Borg - May 3, 2023

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sparked backlash over his response to a controversial question posed by English journalist Piers Morgan.

The federal Labor leader featured in what the Piers Morgan Uncensored host described as an “extraordinary exclusive interview”, which aired at 8pm on Tuesday night UK time.

The monarchy, cricket, cancel culture, Donald Trump and Mr Albanese’s upbringing were among the topics the pair discussed in an extensive interview which will feature on Sky News at 11pm on Wednesday night in Australia.

However, the sit-down chat wasn’t entirely a walk in the park for Mr Albanese, who was at one stage asked “one of the most controversial questions of modern times”.

“What is a woman Prime Minister?” Morgan asked.

“An adult female,” Mr Albanese replied instantly.

In response, the British journalist proceeded to question: “how difficult was that to answer?”

“Not too hard,” Mr Albanese said while slightly shrugging his shoulders and shaking his head.

“I was asked during the (election) campaign actually.”

The Prime Minister continued by telling Morgan he respected people for who they were.

“It’s up to people to be respective and I know that … controversy can come at times like that,” he acknowledged.

Mr Albanese continued to explain he didn’t support some of the campaigns against transgender issues, hinting at anti-transgender activist Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull’s visit to Australia in March.

“There was recently a very controversial visit in Australia that was designed to stir up issues and young people coming to terms with their identity and who they are, I think they need to be respected,” he said.

But his response quickly led to intense debate online, with some accusing the Prime Minister of not acknowledging transgender women in his statement.

Trans activist and blogger Eleanor Evans said Mr Albanese used the question as an opportunity to “drop anti-trans dogwhistles while umming and ahhing about ‘respect’”.

“All through this he couldn’t even bring himself to say the word ‘trans’,” she tweeted.

Political reporter Amy Remeikis accused the PM of “legitimising” a “hateful question”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18789940

File: e64e8e59c273bac⋯.jpg (185.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18789935

2/2

Following Mr Albanese’s response, Morgan transitioned into the topic of transgender athletes in sport.

“What would you do for example on this issue of transgender athletes in women’s sports?” he asked.

“Many sport authorities are now beginning to move to exclude them because they say it’s simply not fair.”

Mr Albanese responded by saying the example Morgan raised indicated sporting organisations were dealing with the issue, which he inferred was the right way to manage the matter.

Morgan then asked Mr Albanese if he thought transgender athletes participating in women’s sports was fair, to which he replied: “In Australia, the sporting codes are able to deal with that and they have”.

This response sparked more fury online, with some viewers claiming the Prime Minister avoided the question.

“Dodged the trans women in female sport question – disappointing response from a ‘leader’,” one person tweeted.

“Sounded like a lot of waffle with no direct answer to the question!” another said.

A third comment said: “‘I think…I think’ - what a stuttering mess”.

Despite the criticism, there was still support for the Prime Minister, with some arguing his response was better than the attempts of other politicians in the past.

“Don’t trans women count as an ‘adult female’? Plus I think he said we need to be respectful of trans people, which is hardly terf-friendly,” one person said.

Founder of the female-only app Giggle Sall Grover tweeted: “The Australian Prime Minister said that a woman is an ‘adult female’, which is correct”.

Mr Albanese is currently in London ahead of the King’s upcoming coronation.

“I’ve just arrived in London – a busy agenda in the United Kingdom,” he tweeted on Tuesday evening.

“Ahead of the Coronation of King Charles III on Saturday, (British) Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and I will be meeting to further discussions on the Australia-UK Free Trade Agreement.”

Mr Albanese added his plans involved a visit to the submarine manufacturing facility in Barrow-in-Furness to see how the AUKUS deal is boosting jobs and defence capabilities.

“I‘ll be meeting with other world leaders to strengthen Australia’s relationships around the world,” he wrote.

“At the coronation I’m proud to be joined by a group of eminent Australians – led by our flag bearer Sam Kerr.”

Mr Albanese also sat down with Morgan ahead of his meeting with King Charles.

“It was a pleasure to meet King Charles III again at Buckingham Palace, and an honour to represent Australia at his Coronation,” he tweeted.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/what-a-stuttering-mess-albaneses-response-to-controversial-question-slammed-by-transactivists/news-story/1d65b9e8459f1a10be85add907301b28

https://twitter.com/TalkTV/status/1653510194838511616

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18790019

File: 0cb3bce2572ee0b⋯.jpg (687.19 KB,825x1478,825:1478,KR_19.jpg)

File: c3cd98ed36071bc⋯.jpg (361.05 KB,1536x2048,3:4,FvJKl37WIAEy_Cs.jpg)

File: 18255a180db852f⋯.jpg (394.82 KB,852x887,852:887,Q_2782.jpg)

File: 68e13f2472f5842⋯.jpeg (105.36 KB,1280x720,16:9,7D41C3B5_45E7_41C7_B5B4_D….jpeg)

>>18784945

Kevin Rudd AC Tweet

Great to catch up with California Governor @GavinNewsom. CA & (Australia) have a close economic & environmental partnership, & shared interests in climate, tech, & entertainment. 60k Aussies live in CA & 400+ (Australian) businesses active in this economy. You're always welcome down under Governor.

https://twitter.com/AmboRudd/status/1653470971397824512

Q Post #2782

Feb 18 2019 04:19:58 (EST)

[Example CA]

https://calmatters.org/articles/commentary/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/amp/?

What ‘family’ runs CA?

They are all connected.

Wealth-Power-Influence

[RIGGED]

The More You Know….

Q

https://qanon.pub/#2782

https://calmatters.org/commentary/2019/01/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/

https://qalerts.pub/?q=newsom

https://qalerts.pub/?q=california

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18794875

File: 673260513c9b330⋯.jpg (60.32 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lana_Collaris_says_the_Vic….jpg)

File: 1fedca7f1edae2d⋯.jpg (70.68 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Victorian_Bar_president_Sa….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18766026

Victorian Bar’s Indigenous voice to parliament comment ‘exceeds its power’

ELLIE DUDLEY - MAY 4, 2023

A Victorian barrister has told the state Bar Council it would “exceed its powers” if it made a public statement on the Indigenous voice to parliament, as rumours swirl that the institution is tilting in favour of supporting the proposed model.

Former Victorian Bar councillor Lana Collaris, who is adamant the state Bar would undermine its independence if it announced a position on the voice, also labelled Bar president Sam Hay “weak” for failing to state his personal view on the matter.

Her comments come as 21 Bar Council members firm up their positions on the matter ahead of a council meeting next Tuesday where they will vote on whether the institution issues a public statement on Anthony Albanese’s voice model.

Ms Collaris told The Australian that while several “activist Bar councillors” were seeking to push through public support for a Yes vote, the Bar’s constitution prohibits the council from exercising its powers for political purpose. “The power of Bar councillors are constrained by the Bar’s constitution (which) makes it clear the Bar may only exercise its powers for its purposes,” she said.

“Those purposes are strictly defined in an exhaustive list as managing and administering the Bar as an independent professional association, regulating aspects of barristers’ practice, promoting and supporting the physical and mental well-being of barristers, maintaining a strong and independent bar, promoting the administration of and access to justice, and upholding the rule of law and democracy.

“Plainly enough, supporting the voice or any political position is not one of the purposes of the Bar.”

The Victorian Bar Council met last Thursday for about four hours to discuss the matter but no decision was made.

The Australian understands 11 councillors indicated support for the Bar backing the Voice proposal, while nine seemed likely to oppose.

The remaining councillor was Mr Hay, who was “refusing to show his cards”, a source close to the matter said.

The council is scheduled to meet again on May 9 to come to a conclusion on the matter.

Mr Hay is facing mounting pressure to state his position on the voice, and publish the positions of individual councillors.

When Ms Collaris wrote to Mr Hay last week asking him for his stance, he replied: “I’m still considering the matter.”

“I hope you’ll accept it from me when I say that I’m genuinely and carefully listening to the views being expressed on both sides of the debate,” he said.

Ms Collaris said Mr Hay’s position was “weak”, adding that “he should be transparent and let us know what he thinks”.

Meanwhile, a notice to convene a special general meeting is still being widely circulated among Bar members, proposing all 2200 vote on whether the ­association should announce a public stance on the voice or keep quiet.

The notice has received 36 of the 40 signatures needed to get over the line. It is expected to be lodged prior to next Tuesday’s council meeting.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/victorian-bar-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-comment-exceeds-its-power/news-story/3f39ddee6e6562774a4725dc2c5114d5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18794901

File: f32c4bd2d121d9f⋯.mp4 (15.95 MB,310x540,31:54,Indigenous_man_speaks_up_a….mp4)

>>18676743

Liberal MP accused of ignoring Aboriginal voices at community forum on the Voice

Lisa Visentin - May 4, 2023

1/2

An Aboriginal elder claims she and other Indigenous people were ignored at a community forum on the Voice to parliament hosted by Liberal MP for Hughes Jenny Ware, and featuring former prime minister Tony Abbott and journalist Joe Hildebrand as its main speakers.

The panel event, streamed live on Ware’s official Facebook page, was drawing to a close after Abbott and Hildebrand had debated for an hour and half and fielded four questions from the audience when an Indigenous man interrupted to say an Aboriginal perspective was needed.

The man’s intervention was preceded by another audience member, who is associated with the Yes campaign, interjecting during Ware’s final remarks to say: “Can we please hear from a First Nations person before we go?”

Ware responded: “We simply do not have the time.”

As Ware pressed ahead, a man who identified himself as Dhungutti and Gumbaynggirr from the NSW mid-north coast, walked onto the stage and took over the lectern, saying: “Maybe you should hear it from an Aboriginal side.”

“I come from an era where there was discrimination, I come from an era where I was told I was too dark. These are the words you all want to think; colonisation, constitution, law, policies, stolen generations, they are system words and those words have been detrimental to Aboriginal people from day one,” he said.

The man spoke for a short time and responded to one interjection from the crowd by saying, “listen old man, just keep it there, I’ve got the stage not you,” prompting murmurings within the audience. He added “the truth hurts”, which was met with applause before the live feed ended.

Aboriginal elder Aunty Dolly Brown, an adviser to the Sutherland Shire Reconciliation organisation, told this masthead she and others in the crowd had grown increasingly frustrated after listening to the debate and being overlooked during the question and answer section.

Brown, who is a Voice supporter and said she was wearing a Yes campaign T-shirt, said she believed she was ignored by Ware, while non-Indigenous people were chosen to ask questions.

“Four times the mic went around. I kept putting my hand up. It’s like it was all played out that First Nations people weren’t going to have a voice that night,” Brown said.

“It was totally rude of Jenny. We were all sitting there with a lot of black faces around me.”

Ware noted the first question she took was from a woman sitting with the Aboriginal elders. The woman, who was wearing an Uluru Statement t-shirt, declared she was a Yes supporter before asking a question of Abbott.

“I then called on other attendees from throughout the audience. It was not possible in the time allocated to take questions from all of those with hands on the air. It was however refreshing to see such an engaged audience on a matter of national importance,” Ware said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18794904

File: 2d928d2836fc00e⋯.jpg (102.05 KB,1120x1485,224:297,The_man_who_identified_him….jpg)

>>18794901

2/2

The MP had set up the forum to help her decide what position she would take on the referendum. During the panel event, Abbott, a staunch critic of the Voice, argued the case for voting No and Hildebrand represented the Yes case.

Brown said she had attended the event as a representative of the reconciliation group and because she was interested to hear Abbott’s views on the issue. She said she had intended to direct her question to the former prime minister after being hurt by some of his remarks.

During his opening argument, Abbott pointed to his record of spending a week in Indigenous communities while PM, saying: “I think I have done my best to walk the walk as well as talk the talk.”

“The problem in remote Australia is not that Indigenous people are not listened to. They are consulted to death. The problem in Indigenous Australia is not lack of action, it is torpor. It is chronic inaction. The kids don’t go to school, the adults don’t go to work and the ordinary law of the land is not enforced. That is what has got to change,” Abbott said.

Ware said the event had been preceded by an acknowledgement of country given by Aunty Gail Smith and praised Hildebrand and Abbott for approaching the debate in a “respectful and thoughtful manner”.

“The panellists demonstrated intellectual rigour and a clear understanding of the concerns and issues around the Voice referendum,” she said.

“Messrs Hildebrand and Abbott attended on their own time. Being respectful of their time as well as the audience, the event concluded after a series of moderated questions as well as questions from the audience. The event lasted for almost two hours.

“At the conclusion of the event, on the recommendation of the AFP, I left the event.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/liberal-mp-accused-of-ignoring-aboriginal-voices-in-a-community-forum-on-voice-20230504-p5d5mw.html

https://www.facebook.com/JennyWare4Hughes/videos/111240745296080

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18794919

File: fba66d83b80cb09⋯.jpg (5.64 MB,5760x3840,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 39bda4623fe04f8⋯.jpg (3.86 MB,6019x3919,6019:3919,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 0c0bc0d8a347f5e⋯.jpg (2.62 MB,6720x4480,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18670474

AUKUS as much about jobs as it is national security, Albanese says

Rob Harris - May 4, 2023

Barrow-in-Furness: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia’s contentious new joint nuclear submarine program with allies Britain and the United States is as much about providing domestic jobs and economic prosperity as it is about national security.

Albanese, in the UK ahead of King Charles III’s coronation on Saturday, spoke after joining British Defence Secretary Ben Wallace on a tour of BAE Systems’ shipyard in Cumbria, where nuclear submarines will be built as part of the AUKUS agreement announced earlier this year alongside US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

The pair spoke to staff and apprentices at the shipyard, where Australians will train to build the SSN-AUKUS submarines as part of the historic $368 billion program. The core of the defence technology sharing alliance is for America and Britain to help Australia build at least eight nuclear-powered – but not nuclear-armed – attack submarines.

Albanese said the AUKUS pact – which will see a new model built at Osborne shipyard in Adelaide by the 2040s – was not just about the common interests of Australia, the UK and the US to uphold the international rule of law, but about “jobs and more jobs”.

“It’s about something more than our national security; it’s about jobs and economic prosperity,” he said.

Albanese said Australian workers would be involved in exchanges with Britain and vice versa and insisted that his government had been upfront and transparent about the costs of the project. He said the new submarine workforce would bring a huge benefit to South Australia, similar to how the car industry drove Australia’s post-war economy.

Wallace joked with Albanese at the training facility that he was worried that Australia would “steal our workers” while also expressing his belief the first of the new class of subs would be designed and ready in the 2030s “to see off threats that are approaching us”.

Wallace said the bulk of the design of the next-generation submarine would be finished in three to four years and insisted the project would remain on a tight timetable to avoid any backlog of submarine orders.

He warned that cost blowouts would be inevitable because the submarine project would take 20 to 30 years, adding it was impossible to predict an accurate price because of uncertain costs and inflation.

“We are confident we can deliver, we need to ensure there is no backup in the queue, it is in my interests as well as Australia’s interests that we are on time and on budget; we need the services of the submarines too,” Wallace said.

“These submarines will protect the Euro-Atlantic region for decades to come and with their interoperable submarine design, will ensure mutual compatibility with our Australian and US allies alongside supporting jobs across the UK and demonstrating the experience and skill which embodies British industry.”

Albanese spoke to local apprentices Maddison Baillie, 16, and Jacob Gillibrand, 17, who showed him how to bend a metal pipe at 90 degrees using a vice.

“That’s pretty good, that’s a success,” he said while inspecting his work.

He went on to test the connectivity of electrical cables and asked worker Stuart Porter, 39, an apprentice electrician, how he ended up in the job. He told Albanese he used to be a teacher but swapped careers to become an apprentice electrician at BAE.

“What made you do that? The fact this has given you more career opportunities, that’s fantastic, I love it,” Albanese told him.

Apprentice electrician Nicole Baker, 18, told him: “I’m a local from Barrow, my dad does this, but not for BAE, and I wanted to do the same as him,” she said.

Albanese confirmed that the Australian government would buy three or more submarines from the US to ensure there would be no capability gap before the AUKUS submarine is ready.

The US would be on rotation in the region in 2023, while the British subs would undertake the rotation from 2026.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/aukus-as-much-about-as-jobs-as-it-is-national-security-albanese-says-20230504-p5d5gi.html?btis=

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18794926

File: d14c67bc7294dbe⋯.jpg (3.86 MB,7915x5277,7915:5277,The_owners_of_WeChat_and_T….jpg)

File: 00a202301412a92⋯.jpg (238.7 KB,2100x968,525:242,NSW_Labor_paid_for_adverti….jpg)

>>18719485

Banning WeChat would ‘damage’ democracy, experts say

Gus McCubbing - May 4, 2023

Banning WeChat in Australia risks causing “emotional, psychological and practical harm” to the country’s large Chinese-speaking community, experts have told a Senate inquiry.

Australia has become the last of the Five Eyes nations to ban viral video-app TikTok from government devices, and a tighter clampdown on social media, particularly those with Chinese ownership, is expected in the coming months. WeChat, owned by Chinese technology titan Tencent, is believed to have about 1 million users in Australia, with 1.3 billion users worldwide.

Seth Kaplan, a lecturer at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, last month told the inquiry into foreign interference through social media he would support banning WeChat, which he described as a “narrative machine for the CCP” that is “worse than TikTok”.

At least 14 Australian government departments either block, ban or have not approved WeChat across their networks and devices. But Dr Wanning Sun, from the University of Technology Sydney, and Dr Haiqing Yu, from RMIT, on Thursday made a late submission to the inquiry in which they argued banning the Chinese social media app would cause more harm than good.

WeChat, they say, is essential for communication between Chinese Australians and their families, friends, and business partners in China given other social media apps including WhatsApp and Facebook are banned. The platform was even used, in some cases, to farewell dying relatives while China’s borders were closed during the pandemic.

“WeChat is a necessity, not a choice for many Chinese Australians,” Dr Sun and Dr Yu said.

“Banning WeChat brings more damage than benefit to our democracy, since it is likely to erode rather than encourage faith in the strength of our democracy and it is likely to infringe on citizens’ rights to communicate on social media platforms. It is potentially damaging to social cohesion, and is likely to be seen as racially and politically motivated.”

Dr Sun and Dr Yu also said it was wrong to assume that Chinese Australians were homogeneous and “easy preys to WeChat propaganda”. The Chinese community, they added, as with any other ethnic or language group, was divided in its political views and WeChat was often used for political debate.

“WeChat, like Facebook and Twitter, is a social media platform that carries wide-ranging and diversely sourced content; its ideological landscape is fragmented and contested,” they said.

“Just as it can be used to promote extreme views, it can also promote citizenship education, mobilise civic action, and encourage political participation in Australian politics. The current debate on WeChat regarding the Voice is a good case in point.”

The Liberals used it in March during the Aston byelection, where 14 per cent of voters had Chinese ancestry. And NSW Labor Premier Chris Minns, whose Kogarah electorate has that state’s third-highest concentration of Australians of Chinese ancestry, emerged as one of the more prolific WeChat advertisers during the state election.

“WeChat is one of the social media platforms that Chinese Australians use to inform themselves about Australian government policies on a wide range of issues,” Dr Sun and Dr Yu said.

Dr Kaplan told the inquiry last month that narratives and information were “managed” on WeChat and dissenting views were “demoted or eliminated”.

Fergus Ryan, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s International Cyber Policy Centre, said while banning WeChat or TikTok would come at a “huge cost” to Chinese Australians it should never be “taken off the table”.

“It doesn’t make sense to me that you would willingly remove that leverage that you have over a tech company,” Mr Ryan said.

WeChat (and its Chinese mainland equivalent Weixin) is subject to tight controls by Chinese Communist Party internet censors as well as Beijing’s intelligence laws, which compel it to co-operate with the one-party authoritarian state.

https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/banning-wechat-would-damage-democracy-experts-say-20230504-p5d5mb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18794944

File: 6717965bf07dbf2⋯.mp4 (15.99 MB,640x360,16:9,Daniel_Andrews_on_Monash_C….mp4)

>>18687407

>>18760774

‘Disappointing’: Monash Council cancels drag queen story time event

Sophie Aubrey - May 4, 2023

1/2

Monash City Council has cancelled a drag queen story time event after threats of violence against families, the performer, councillors and staff escalated to include intimidation from neo-Nazis following a tense protest at its offices.

The south-eastern council’s meeting in Glen Waverley was derailed last week when almost 200 people attended, many protesting against its sold-out drag queen event planned for children and parents at Oakleigh Library on May 19.

Extra security staff and police officers were on hand after fringe groups, including My Place and Reignite Democracy Australia, rallied supporters to attend. The groups espouse views often associated with alt-right or conspiracy-theory thinking and can be hostile to the LGBTQ community.

Protesters verbally abused attending residents and repeatedly labelled councillors “paedophiles”, forcing the council to temporarily adjourn proceedings. The drag queen who was to host the library event, Sam T, said she also had received death threats.

Unlike other councils, including Casey and Boroondara, Monash had until today refused to give into weeks of abuse and threats to scrap its drag event. The intimidation increased in recent days.

Screenshots from social media app Telegram show that Thomas Sewell – who leads Australia’s largest neo-Nazi group, the National Socialist Network – wrote in a since-deleted post on Tuesday that he would “bring as many Nazis as possible” to the drag event.

Monash chief executive Dr Andi Diamond said the decision to scratch the event was made in consultation with Victoria Police.

“Councillors and staff have received messages that nobody should be expected to receive in their workplace, as have our LGBTIQA+ community,” Diamond said. “In recent days, these threats have escalated to direct threats of violence involving the event itself.

“It is incredibly disappointing to have to cancel an event designed to celebrate the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia, but we were left with no choice after Victoria Police advised council of the risks.

“In the end, we were unable to guarantee that we would be able to hold the event safely.”

Diamond said the event was designed to introduce children to diverse role models and encourage acceptance, love and respect, and she apologised to the LGBTQ community for the cancellation.

“I hope they understand we did not make this decision lightly and we share their disappointment,” she said.

“We understood this [event] was not for everyone and scheduled it outside our regular library programs so that parents planning to bring their children were making a deliberate choice to attend. Unfortunately, some in the community were not willing to allow that choice.”

A spokeswoman for Victoria Police did not comment on the force’s concerns for the drag event, but said the decision to scrap it was ultimately made by the council after a risk assessment was conducted.

Greens councillor Dr Josh Fergeus, who had been a vocal supporter of the drag event, said he backed Diamond’s decision, saying she had been put in an “impossible position”.

He criticised the state government for not providing with the support needed to proceed with the event safely and said not enough had been done to combat the threat of far-right extremism.

“I think the state government has essentially failed to take these growing threats seriously, and we now find ourselves in a position where local democracy is extremely vulnerable,” Fergeus said.

Last week, a spokeswoman for the Victorian government said it would not step in to help councils beef up their security.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18794946

File: e351e50e7e72b72⋯.jpg (378.58 KB,1967x2950,1967:2950,Drag_queen_Sam_T_who_was_t….jpg)

File: 770a8d5fa07bdf9⋯.jpg (87.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Protesters_have_derailed_a….jpg)

>>18794944

2/2

Dr Sean Mulcahy, co-lead of the Victorian Pride Lobby’s rainbow local government campaign, attended last week’s Monash council meeting with members of the LGBTQ community.

Mulcahy acknowledged it would have been a tough decision for the council to call off the library event, but said the outcome was “incredibly sad”.

“The community is going to be hurting a lot,” he said.

“It’s an incredibly fraught issue because the number-one thing is to protect the safety of children and parents, but at the same time there’s a real risk that cancellation will embolden the opposition and lead to further attacks down the track.”

Mulcahy urged the Victorian government to fast-track proposed reforms to anti-vilification laws aimed at protecting LGBTQ people. He said vitriol against the community had increased since an anti-trans rights demonstration outside Victorian parliament on March 18, where some in attendance performed Nazi salutes.

On Tuesday, Attorney-General Jaclyn Symes said extending anti-vilification protections was a priority and she hoped to have the legislation within the next 18 months.

But Mulcahy said: “We can’t wait 18 months. This is escalating.”

In parliament on Thursday, as news broke of Monash Council’s decision, Premier Daniel Andrews criticised what he described as “ugly scenes” at last week’s meeting.

“This is hate speech, plain and simple,” he said. “It’s out of step with the values of fair-minded, decent Victorians. It’s on the fringe.”

Alt-right campaigns to shut down events for transgender people and drag acts started in the US and UK before making their way to Australia.

Dr Kaz Ross, who researches far-right extremism and conspiracy groups, said the decision to scrap the event was “completely the wrong move”.

“Councils have to stand up to this kind of bullying; this is really important,” she said. “Every time you do this [cancel events] you’re saying to the Nazis, ‘You’ve won’.”

Municipal Association of Victoria president David Clark last week said councils were grossly unprepared for the type of vitriol being hurled at them and fringe groups were unfairly capitalising on the close relationship local government had with community members.

There have been at least 15 councils statewide disrupted by fringe groups in recent months and the Monash protest was the most aggressive yet.

Among those who attended Monash’s meeting were fringe group figures who rose to prominence during anti-lockdown protests, such as United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet, Monica Smit, Avi Yemini and Rukshan Fernando.

Clark supported moves to close public galleries and hold council meetings online – as Yarra Ranges Council had already done – as an interim measure to deal with meeting protests.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/monash-council-cancels-drag-queen-story-time-event-20230504-p5d5jn.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18795008

File: 7f6e78950a4f1a6⋯.jpg (295.38 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Former_Australian_PM_Malco….jpg)

File: 4c73e1f012fb575⋯.jpg (664.48 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,A_truck_outside_the_court_….jpg)

File: 9cffca709a4e7b8⋯.jpg (362.59 KB,825x701,825:701,MT_3.jpg)

Rupert’s our ‘deadliest export’, Trump’s an egomaniac bully, says Turnbull

Farrah Tomazin - May 4, 2023

1/2

New York: Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has described Rupert Murdoch as Australia’s deadliest export, saying no one has done more to damage American democracy than the US-based media mogul.

And as Donald Trump’s campaign to return to the White House builds momentum, Turnbull also gave his frank assessment of the former president, branding him a “shameless showman” and a “bully” whose lies about the 2020 election being stolen constituted “gaslighting on an epic scale”.

Speaking at an event hosted by Heather Ridout, Australia’s new consul-general in New York, and titled “Defending Democracy”, Turnbull told the audience: “What we saw in this country was a government that was nearly overthrown in a coup promoted by the president – and in an environment that was enabled by Fox News and other right-wing media.

“I say this without any sense of hyperbole: I do not believe that there is any individual alive today that has done more damage to American democracy than Rupert Murdoch. You might say [he’s] Australia’s deadliest export.”

Murdoch, now an American citizen, presides over a large influential media empire in the United States, UK and Australia. Turnbull did not elaborate further on the reasons for his “deadliest” claim.

His comments come two weeks after Fox agreed to pay a $US787.5 million ($1.17 billion) settlement to Dominion Voting Systems after airing claims the company had rigged its voting machines to help President Joe Biden win office.

As court filings have revealed over the past few months, some of Fox News’ top executives and presenters fuelled this lie because they were so concerned about losing audience share and profits to rival networks, despite knowing that Trump’s claims of voter fraud were untrue.

Among those presenters was Tucker Carlson, Fox’s highest rating prime-time host, who drew more than 3 million viewers a night to his daily 8pm show and was an influencer of Republican Party politics.

The 53-year-old was mysteriously sacked last week amid revelations of vulgar texts messages about a senior executive, claims of sexism from a former staffer who is now suing the network, and his inflammatory views on race. One text, revealed by the New York Times this week, reportedly included fantasies of a white “mob” killing a left-wing “Antifa kid”.

Some political observers and media experts have suggested that Carlson’s abrupt firing could be emblematic of a shift in Fox’s coverage. However, Turnbull – a former journalist and head of the lobby group Australians for a Murdoch Royal Commission – made the point that Fox News provided Murdoch with the “single most influential element in the right-wing political environment in this country”.

“How do we deal with this?” the former leader asked, noting that the media landscape had become so hyper-partisan that many people “are now living in information silos” with opposing views of reality.

Citing former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, who once urged fans to “flood the zone with shit”, Turnbull argued the answer was to do the opposite: “flood the zone with facts”.

He drew on his own experience at the 2016 election, when Labor falsely told voters the Coalition wanted to sell Medicare. He said this was an “audacious lie” but it worked because “we did not do enough to rebut it”.

“The perceived wisdom at that time was that, if people were saying crazy things like ‘the election’s stolen’ or ‘you’re about to sell Medicare’, [and] you rebutted it, you’re giving it more salience and oxygen.

“In the digital media, and the viral media age, that is no longer right. You have to have a whack-a-mole approach […] and keep rebutting and hitting those lies on the head.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18795015

File: f3bc32853c16b48⋯.jpg (153.23 KB,825x365,165:73,POTUS_17.jpg)

File: 49c9e47c7fb3569⋯.jpg (232.75 KB,841x514,841:514,Q_479.jpg)

File: ccb3ea3d2932b3c⋯.jpg (300.17 KB,842x828,421:414,Q_908.jpg)

File: a6f1a731b3eccc9⋯.jpg (136.57 KB,842x302,421:151,Q_910.jpg)

>>18795008

2/2

Asked what he thought of Trump, who is currently the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for another term in the White House, Turnbull recounted his “blazing row” with the then newly elected president in January 2017 when Trump berated him over a refugee resettlement deal done with the Obama administration.

“Trump is a big, narcissistic egomaniac with a sense of self-belief that is off the charts even by political standards. He’s a bully … and the one thing you cannot do with bullies is give in to them.”

Turnbull served as Australia’s 29th prime minister from 2015 to 2018, but was replaced by Scott Morrison after a failed challenge by Peter Dutton. He is now a regular visitor to the US and has recently produced a multipart podcast, Defending Democracy, which examines issues such as authoritarianism, misinformation campaigns, and the democratic backsliding around the world.

In his farewell speech as prime minister in 2018, Turnbull suggested forces “outside the parliament” were partly responsible for his demise. As reported by this masthead that year, he had earlier challenged Murdoch over the coverage of his government by News Corp newspapers and its Sky News television channel, arguing the media company was intensifying the leadership turmoil.

Fox News and News Corp have been contacted for comment.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/rupert-s-our-deadliest-export-trump-s-an-egomaniac-bully-says-turnbull-20230504-p5d5mh.html

https://twitter.com/TurnbullMalcolm/status/1346919266751193088

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/827002559122567168

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/04/full-transcript-of-trumps-phone-call-with-australian-prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull

https://qanon.pub/#479

https://qanon.pub/#908

https://qanon.pub/#910

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18795043

File: 22dffc0a19220ae⋯.jpg (532.85 KB,1894x1065,1894:1065,Private_equity_mogul_Steph….jpg)

File: 2fd7cf0e5d24867⋯.jpg (615.68 KB,991x1383,991:1383,Q_1001.jpg)

File: 87763447066776d⋯.jpg (304.57 KB,942x942,1:1,187_Site_E.jpg)

Exclusive: Billionaire Investor Buys Jeffrey Epstein’s Private Islands For $60 Million

A private equity mogul, who says he never met Epstein, plans to develop a luxury resort on the infamous property.

Richard J. Chang - May 3, 2023

After more than a year on the market, Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous Caribbean islands have finally found a buyer: Stephen Deckoff, founder of private equity firm Black Diamond Capital Management, has purchased the two islands for $60 million, less than half of their initial asking price of $125 million.

Deckoff plans to develop a 25-room luxury resort on the property, he said Wednesday, adding that he never met Epstein and never set foot on the islands until they were marketed following Epstein’s 2019 death.

“I’ve been proud to call the U.S. Virgin Islands home for more than a decade and am tremendously pleased to be able to bring the area a world-class destination benefitting its natural grace and beauty,” Deckoff tells Forbes. “I very much look forward to working with the U.S. Virgin Islands to make this dream a reality.”

The property, which spans the 70-plus-acre Little St. James and 160-plus-acre Great St. James islands, is located just off the shores of tourism hub St. Thomas and already boasts a helipad, multiple pools and several guest villas. Deckoff is in the process of recruiting architects and engineers to work on developing the resort, which he plans to open in about two years.

Epstein’s ownership has cast a dark shadow over the islands, despite the natural beauty of their palm tree-dotted beaches and crystal clear water. The disgraced financier purchased Little St. James in 1998 for a reported $8 million. He lived in a large mansion there and constructed several bizarre structures on the property, which has been dubbed “pedophile island” for its role in Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. Alleged victim Virginia Giuffre has claimed that Prince Andrew, Duke of York, raped her on Little St. James (a claim Buckingham Palace has denied). Epstein bought the neighboring Great St. James, which is largely undeveloped, in 2016 for a reported $22.5 million.

He died in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while facing federal charges for trafficking minors in Florida and New York. His associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, was found guilty of child sex trafficking in December 2021 for her role in helping Epstein procure underage girls and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.

Epstein’s estate agreed to pay $105 million to the U.S. Virgin Islands, including the repayment of $80 million in tax benefits, after the territory’s attorney general sued in 2020, claiming the Virgin Islands were duped into granting Epstein’s company, Southern Trust Company, tax benefits that allowed Epstein to use his residence there to abuse girls and women. The settlement grants the U.S. Virgin Islands government half the proceeds from the sale of the islands - some $30 million - to be put into a trust to provide counseling and other services for victims of sexual abuse.

Deckoff–who has a net worth of $3 billion, according to Forbes’ estimates–built a fortune in private equity, working his way up at several firms, including Drexel Burnham Lambert, Bear Stearns and Kidder, Peabody & Co., before striking out on his own in 1995 with Black Diamond Capital. Today, the Stamford, Connecticut-based company manages some $9 billion in assets and specializes in high-yield debt, distressed debt, restructuring and business turnarounds.

A native of New York City, Deckoff moved to the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2011. He has given more than $1.2 million to nonprofits there, mostly to private schools and nature preservation organizations.

The islands are still recovering from two category 5 hurricanes, Irma and Maria, that tore through in September 2017. Deckoff’s plan is to construct a “state-of-the-art, five-star, world-class luxury 25-room resort” on the property, according to a press release Wednesday, to help boost tourism and economic development “while respecting and preserving the important environment of the islands.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardjchang/2023/05/03/exclusive-billionaire-buys-jeffrey-epsteins-private-islands-60-million/

Q Post #1001

Apr 3 2018 20:11:01 (EST)

Where do roads lead?

Each prince is associated with a cardinal direction: north, south, east and west.

Sacrifice.

Collect.

[Classified]-1

[Classified]-2

Tunnels.

Table 29.

D-Room H

D-Room R

D-Room C

Pure EVIL.

'Conspiracy'

Q

https://qanon.pub/#1001

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800562

File: f307c9eb300a93e⋯.jpg (119.44 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_of_the_Unit….jpg)

Rishi Sunak says China is Britain’s greatest threat to economic security

GREG SHERIDAN - MAY 5, 2023

1/2

China is the single greatest threat to Britain’s economic security, ­according to British Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak.

In an exclusive interview in his Downing Street office, Mr Sunak also hailed the AUKUS agreement with Australia, the US and the UK as “the most significant multilateral defence partnership in generations”.

In comments on China that are stronger than any others he has made since becoming Prime Minister, Mr Sunak characterised China’s behaviour as “increasingly authoritarian at home and assertive abroad”.

“It represents the single biggest threat to our economic security; it’s a challenge that we need to grapple with,” he said.

Mr Sunak said China was the only country that had the means and the intent to try to reshape the international rules based system. He said democratic nations such as Britain and Australia needed to ensure they had the laws, resources and capabilities in place to make sure that they can protect themselves against “actions that would be damaging to our interests and our values”.

He hailed the deepening strategic partnership between the UK and Australia, especially their shared views on China and the Indo-Pacific region. “I think everything I’ve said Australia would agree with and the language I’m using is very similar to the language in your Defence Strategic Review,” he said. “I’ve discussed this with Anthony (Albanese) as well and we see this in a very similar way, as do our other partners Japan and Canada.”

He cited a recent British action blocking a proposed Chinese investment in a semiconductor company as an example of British resolve on China-related issues.

Mr Sunak, who hosted Mr Albanese in London prior to the coronation of King Charles and announced the date the free trade agreement between the two nations would come into force, hailed the UK-Australia relationship.

“AUKUS speaks to the incredible trust between the three nations – America, Australia and the UK – and the deep respect we have for each others’ armed forces,” he said.

In terms of the UK-Australia relationship, he said AUKUS represented “a deepening of our already strong partnership”.

“This doesn’t happen very often that countries share technology like this, having interoperable submarine fleets,” he said.

Nuclear-propelled submarines were a “vital” military asset. “This is one of the most important offensive capabilities countries like ours will possess,” he said. “These interoperable submarine fleets allow us to work together to ensure the openness and freedom of our oceans everywhere. These submarines can operate in multiple oceans. I think they will have an unmatched capability.”

Mr Sunak was also upbeat about the economic relationship with Australia, especially in light of the free trade agreement, Britain’s first since Brexit. “It’s an incredible economic opportunity for our two countries,” he said.

“There’s billions of pounds of trade that’s going to be unlocked. It will support tens of thousands of jobs in both our countries.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800566

File: 0516f53aca799ac⋯.jpg (134.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18800562

2/2

The British leader said his nation had tilted its foreign policy towards the Indo-Pacific in part because that was where the greatest economic growth would occur.

In some balance to his strong criticisms of China’s behaviour, Mr Sunak also said it was important to engage Beijing where possible to deal with global issues such as climate change, macro-economic stability and global health policy.

He praised Australia’s support for Ukraine in its resistance to the Russian invasion, an issue on which London had taken the lead, with Britain being the most important international partner for Ukraine after the US. “We should all just be incredibly struck by the bravery and resilience of the Ukrainian people,” he said.

“This was a war people thought would be over in a matter of days, or weeks. Here we are over a year later with Ukraine having recaptured a large chunk of the territory Russia initially took, with a global alliance of over 140 countries in the United Nations condemning Russian behaviour, with the largest, most effective, most co-ordinated sanctions package the world has ever seen and with NATO strengthened with the addition of Finland, and Sweden to come. And countries across Europe raising their defence budgets … Australia’s contribution has been fantastic, particularly here in the UK where they are participating in Operation Interflex, helping us to train Ukrainian civilians to become soldiers. It’s humbling and inspiring. It’s a very moving experience to talk to these ordinary civilians who are being trained in a short space of time to go and fight to defend their country. Their courage should be an inspiration to us to keep giving Ukraine all the support we can.”

Mr Sunak has succeeded in stabilising the British government and ruling Conservative Party. Despite reversals in local elections in much of the nation, he is seen as offering competence, common sense and stability after a tumultuous period in British politics featuring successive overthrows of a series of prime ministers. He has set out five economic priorities for his government: halving inflation, growing the economy, reducing debt, cutting waiting lists in the National Health Service and stopping the boats that carry illegal immigrants.

But Britain, like most Western nations, spent hugely during Covid-19 and has a deep structural budget deficit. Mr Sunak believes the UK can cut the deficit over time. “It’s important that we reduce debt for economic reasons, for financial security and to reduce the pressure on interest rates and inflation,” he said.

“But I also think it’s important for moral reasons, that we don’t rack up bills and expect our children to pay for them. I’ve always believed that; it’s what Margaret Thatcher believed. It’s one of the reasons I’m a Conservative.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/rishi-sunak-says-china-is-britains-greatest-threat-to-economic-security/news-story/bff2462ae62911e26d497c7b285bb9fd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800625

File: fef99539c5f2c5e⋯.jpg (108.87 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chinese_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

File: d3d36f4d032f5ca⋯.jpg (133.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_left_with….jpg)

>>18800562

China challenge ‘epoch-defining’, Rishi Sunak warns as Xi Jinping vows PLA ‘wall of steel’

WILL GLASGOW - MARCH 14, 2023

1/2

Xi Jinping has declared China will build the People’s Liberation Army into a “great wall of steel” to protect the rising giant’s “national sovereignty” on the eve of ­Anthony Albanese, Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak unveiling their monumental AUKUS submarine deal.

British Prime Minister, Mr Sunak, warned China posed an “epoch-defining systemic challenge” as he headed to San Diego in the US to meet Mr Albanese and Mr Biden to lay out their AUKUS plans to deter an increasingly assertive Beijing.

In a nationalistic address that underscored the febrile security environment in the region, the Chinese President spoke of his country’s “national humiliation” by Western colonial powers and instructed his officials to prepare for any future contingency, declaring “security … the bedrock of ­development”.

“We must fully promote the modernisation of national defence and the armed forces, and build the people’s armed forces into a great wall of steel that effectively safeguards national sovereignty, security and development interests,” Mr Xi said on Monday at the closing session of the National People’s Congress, China’s annual rubber-stamp parliament.

To the cheers of nearly 3000 delegates, Mr Xi called for unification with the self-ruled island of Taiwan, which Beijing views as part of its own territory. “The great rejuvenation of the Chinese ­nation has entered an irreversible historical process,” he said.

China’s strongman leader spoke as the UK Prime Minister and his Australian counterpart met over supper in San Diego before the announcement of the most substantial upgrade to Australia’s military capability since World War II. Hours earlier, the British PM said China was a country with “fundamentally different values to ours, and I think over the last few years it’s become increasingly authoritarian at home and assertive abroad”.

“Its behaviour suggests it has the intention – but also its actions show it is interested in reshaping the world order and that’s the crux of it,” he said.

In a major security speech, Mr Sunak said the UK needed to be “ready to stand our ground” in a world where “competition ­between states becomes more ­intense”. “We will fortify our national defences, from economic security to technology supply chains and intelligence expertise, to ensure we are never again vulnerable to the actions of a hostile power,” the British Prime Minister said.

Mr Albanese on Monday spoke to key regional partners, including Indonesian President Joko Widodo, to allay concerns about the huge military project, which has concerned some in Southeast Asia. He said the nuclear submarine plan, which is expected to involve Australia buying up to five US nuclear-powered submarines as a stopgap measure while a new fleet is built based on a British design, marked a “new dawn” for the nation’s defence policy.

“It’s been well received and understood why we’re doing this. It builds on our long-term relationship,” the Prime Minister said.

The hugely expensive project to ­acquire “world-leading” ­nuclear submarine capability – likely to cost hundreds of billions of dollars – is a key plank in the response by America and its allies to the massive build-up of the capabilities of China’s People’s Liberation Army over the past decade. Beijing last week further ramped up military spending by more than 7 per cent to more than $330bn.

There is widespread support for the AUKUS project in Taipei. Lo Chih-Cheng, a member of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, said Taiwan’s government saw the security pact as part of a crucial effort to change Beijing’s calculus on ever using force in an attempt to bring the self-ruled island under Communist Party rule.

“Your decision to acquire nuclear submarines and to build up strength in your defence capabilities is conducive to redressing the imbalance that is happening now in the region,” said Mr Lo, a government member of Taiwan’s foreign affairs and national security committee.

“We may not be able to stop China’s continuing military ­expansion, but it is imperative for us to stop the continuation of this kind of military imbalance.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800637

File: cd2ba94b81e8faa⋯.jpg (4.43 MB,6555x4375,1311:875,A_US_Virginia_class_submar….jpg)

>>18800625

2/2

Taiwan’s main opposition party, the Kuomintang (KMT), also welcomed the submarine acquisition. “We welcome measures to address the future balance of power in the western Pacific. And we would like to see a stronger Western alliance in terms of military capability and technology,” said the KMT’s top international adviser Alexander Huang.

Professor Huang noted that the submarine deal, while helpful in the medium term, would not be in operation for more than 10 years, whereas Beijing was putting extreme pressure on Taiwan now.

China’s propaganda machine over the weekend ramped up ­attacks on the AUKUS agreement, which it called part of a US-led effort to contain China. The Biden administration’s success in strengthening defence partnerships with Indo-Pacific ­allies such as Taiwan’s neighbours, the Philippines and Japan, has ­angered Beijing. In blunt comments last week, Mr Xi told China’s ­parliament: “Western countries – led by the US – had ­implemented all-round containment, encirclement and ­suppression against us, bringing unprecedentedly severe challenges to our country’s ­development”.

Government-connected advisers in Beijing warned Canberra the deal would lead to a deterioration of relations with China.

Zhou Bo, a retired People’s Liberation Army senior colonel, said the submarine project would put Canberra in a “very difficult situation” as China’s and America’s strategic competition increases.

“I think the Chinese government will continue to push back because this deal is not in China’s interest or even in the interests of the region … I think the Australian government will find itself more and more sandwiched in the future,” Mr Zhou said.

A senior fellow of the Centre for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, Mr Zhou said eight nuclear-powered Australian submarines would complicate Beijing’s military planning.

“It will certainly make decision making in Beijing more complicated,” he said. “But I would say China is strong enough or ­confident enough not to take these as game changers.”

He said Australia had been “sweet talked” by the US into a submarine deal that was against Canberra’s interests.

“The whole purpose of having these three countries in AUKUS is basically to get the Australian government to subsidise the American military,” he said.

China’s diplomatic support of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and heightened military activity around Taiwan has raised concerns about its intentions towards the island, which the Communist Party considers a rogue province.

There was no change to China’s Taiwan policy announced during the National People’s Congress.

Mr Zhou said there was a widespread misconception about Beijing’s intentions.

“First of all, China has never ­announced a timetable for reunification with Taiwan,” he said. “Second, it is in our own best ­interest to have peaceful reunification with Taiwan because what is the use of a Taiwan that is totally shattered?”

But he warned that the international community needed to beware of Beijing’s red lines. “Do not let mainland China believe that there is no more chance for peaceful reunification,” he said.

Mr Lo said Beijing was continuing to try to condition the world to believe that it was “legitimate” for China to expand.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/china-challenge-epochdefining-rishi-sunak-warns-as-xi-jinping-vows-pla-wall-of-steel/news-story/246bc8599eee1f281bb7ab288ff9d15e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800673

File: 305c944a2a34023⋯.mp4 (13.57 MB,640x360,16:9,Australia_PM_frustrated_ov….mp4)

File: 3c4bb7ddd9742c2⋯.jpg (1.82 MB,3500x2334,1750:1167,WikiLeaks_founder_Julian_A….jpg)

>>18676828

Australia PM says 'frustrated' over continued detention of Julian Assange

Renju Jose - May 5, 2023

SYDNEY, May 5 (Reuters) - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday he was frustrated for not yet finding a diplomatic fix over the continued detention of Julian Assange and that he remained concerned about the mental health of the WikiLeaks' founder.

"I know it's frustrating, I share the frustration," Albanese told ABC television from London where Assange is being held pending a U.S. extradition case.

"I can't do more than make very clear what my position is and the U.S. administration is certainly very aware of what the Australian government's position is. There is nothing to be served by his ongoing incarceration."

Assange, an Australian citizen, is battling extradition from Britain to the United States where he is wanted on criminal charges over the release of confidential U.S. military records and diplomatic cables in 2010. Washington says the release of the documents had put lives in danger.

Albanese said Australians were failing to understand the reasons for freeing the source who leaked the documents to Assange while he still remained in prison, referring to the release of former U.S. soldier and WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning.

Assange spent seven years holed up in Ecuador's embassy in London after being offered refuge but was dragged out by British police in 2019. He has been staying in a prison in London while his extradition case was decided.

Albanese has been advocating for the release of Assange, who faces a sentence of up to 175 years in a maximum security prison if extradited to the United States.

"Enough is enough, this needs to be brought to a conclusion, it needs to be worked through," said Albanese.

In November, Albanese had raised the issue in meetings with United States officials but did not confirm on Friday if he would raise it with President Biden during his visit to Sydney on May 24 for the Quad leaders' summit.

"The way that diplomacy works … is probably not to forecast the discussions that you will have," he said.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australia-pm-says-frustrated-over-continued-detention-julian-assange-2023-05-05/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800699

File: cfcef57cfffa980⋯.jpg (72.56 KB,800x600,4:3,Julian_Assange_in_prison_i….jpg)

>>18676828

>>18800673

Assange backers buoyed as PM says 'enough is enough'

Andrew Brown and Peter Bodkin - May 5 2023

Bipartisan backing for the release of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has buoyed supporters' hopes the Australian's prison stint will end, as the prime minister declares "enough is enough".

In his strongest comments on the case since his election win, Anthony Albanese said there was no benefit to the 51-year-old's ongoing detention in the UK.

His position was backed by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who said he was concerned for the Australian's fate and the case had gone on for too long.

Greg Barnes, a barrister and advisor to the Australian Assange campaign, said the leaders' comments were significant and represented a united front.

He urged both political leaders to raise the issue of Assange's imprisonment with US President Joe Biden during his visit to Australia later this month.

"(Their comments) send a strong signal to Washington that Australian politicians are united on this issue.

"They are the strongest we've seen from the prime minister expressing frustration … and the Dutton comments are the strongest comments a coalition leader has made in relation to the case since the very early days."

Mr Albanese, who is in the UK for the King's coronation, would not say whether he planned to raise the issue with Mr Biden.

Assange has been in prison in the UK for more than four years and is fighting extradition to the US to face espionage charges.

"My position is that enough is enough. And I continue to say in private what I have said publicly … that enough is enough," Mr Albanese said on Thursday, UK time.

"I can't do more than make very clear what my position is and the US administration is certainly very aware of what the Australian government's position is."

Mr Albanese said Assange's case needed to be looked at in the context of the time the WikiLeaks founder had already spent in custody, comparing his treatment to that of Chelsea Manning.

The former US Army soldier was released in 2017 after disclosing hundreds of thousands of sensitive documents to WikiLeaks.

"When Australians look at the circumstances, look at the fact that a person who released the information is walking freely now having served some time in incarceration … then they will see a disconnect there," Mr Albanese said.

"There is nothing to be served by his ongoing incarceration and I am concerned about Mr Assange's mental health."

Mr Dutton said he agreed with the prime minister that the case needed to be dealt with and had been drawn out for too long.

"Of course I'm concerned for him at an individual level. I think it's gone on for too long and I think that's the fault of many people - including Mr Assange, to be honest," he said.

"The matters have to be dealt with. If the prime minister's charting a course through to an outcome, then that is a good thing."

Mr Barnes said he hoped the prime minister would also discuss Assange's case with UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak during a bilateral meeting in London on Friday.

"The UK is the nation which has to approve any extradition request and certainly (the prime minister) ought to be urging Rishi Sunak and his government to withdraw the approval for that request," he said.

"The case has gone on far too long and no public interest is served."

Assange has appealed to the UK High Court and the European Court of Human Rights to block his extradition.

In 2021, a British judge ruled the Australian should not be extradited to the US due to concerns for his mental health, but the decision was overturned on appeal.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8183922/assange-backers-buoyed-as-pm-says-enough-is-enough/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800731

File: 7beef7e1270cfb7⋯.jpg (5.87 MB,7909x5273,7909:5273,John_Shipton_Julian_Assang….jpg)

File: 87e0e06b5140424⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,4392x3130,2196:1565,WikiLeaks_founder_Julian_A….jpg)

>>18676828

>>18800673

‘It’s incredible’: Julian Assange supporters thrilled by Dutton remarks

Matthew Knott and James Massola - May 5, 2023

Supporters of Julian Assange feel buoyed by the emergence of bipartisan support for the case against the WikiLeaks founder to be brought to a close after a significant change in rhetoric from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Friday expressed frustration with his government’s inability to convince the Biden administration to drop its extradition request for Assange, saying he had left United States officials with no doubt about his position on the matter

Dutton – who had previously been highly critical of Assange – said on Friday that Assange’s case had gone on for too long and should be brought to a conclusion.

The United States Justice Department has charged Assange with 17 counts of breaching the Espionage Act, plus a separate hacking-related charge.

The US is seeking to extradite Assange from London, where he has been held in a high-security prison since 2019.

In his strongest comments yet on the Assange case, Albanese said: “I know it’s frustrating, I share the frustration.”

“I can’t do more than make very clear what my position is,” Albanese told the ABC during a visit to London for King Charles III’s coronation.

“And the US administration is certainly very aware of what the Australian government’s position is.”

Albanese said: “I continue to say in private what I said publicly as Labor leader and what I’ve said as Prime Minister: that enough is enough.”

“This needs to be brought to a conclusion. It needs to be worked through, we’re working through diplomatic channels, we’re making very clear what our position is on Mr Assange’s case.”

Dutton backed Albanese’s position on Friday, saying Assange’s case had gone on for too long.

“The matters, I think, have to be dealt with and if the Prime Minister’s charting a course through to an outcome on that, that’s a good thing,” he told ABC radio.

He indicated the opposition would work behind-the-scenes with the government to help secure Assange’s release.

Dutton was previously far more critical of Assange, saying last July that the government should provide regular consular assistance to him but not otherwise seek to intervene in his case.

Former foreign minister Bob Carr, a strong supporter of Assange, said the Assange issue was a “test case” for US Ambassador Caroline Kennedy ahead of President Biden’s visit to Australia in less than two weeks for the Quad leaders’ meeting.

“It’s one thing to tour Australia visiting Aboriginal art festivals, but the ambassador’s highest priority should be to pitch strongly Australian views to the Whitehouse and the State department,” he said.

“There is no doubt that the majority Australian opinion is that Julian Assange has paid a high enough price. She should be on the phone saying this issue is red hot, it’s got Peter Dutton - the leader of conservative opinion - joining with the Labor prime minister.”

The United States Embassy in Australia has been contacted for comment.

Greg Barns, a legal adviser to the Assange campaign, said: “Dutton’s comments are significant because they show for the first time a clear bipartisan support for ending the legal proceedings against Assange.”

Assange’s brother Gabriel Shipton welcomed Dutton’s comments, saying: “There is a consensus now on both sides of politics that Julian should be freed and that his case has gone on for too long. It’s incredible.”

“I really hope that when Biden comes to Australia, he hears loud and clear that the Australian public wants Julian brought back home.

“As Julian’s family, we’ll be very grateful if the prime minister raises this with President Biden himself.”

Shipton said there had been a “slow escalation” in the government’s efforts to secure Assange’s release over recent months, including a visit last month by Australia’s new UK High Commissioner Stephen Smith to Assange in prison.

Albanese said he had issues with what Assange had published and understood American concerns about the leaking of classified material, but said the punishment of Assange had been excessive.

“I think that when Australians look at the circumstances, look at the fact that the person who released the information [Chelsea Manning] is walking freely now, having served some time in incarceration but is now released for a long period of time, then they’ll see that there is a disconnect there,” he said.

“I am concerned about Mr Assange’s mental health. There was a court decision here in the United Kingdom that was then overturned on appeal that went to Mr Assange’s health as well, and I am concerned for him.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-expresses-frustration-over-assange-case-as-dutton-changes-tone-20230505-p5d5tx.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800846

File: 454dc13e11a20cb⋯.jpg (89.05 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_Marist_Brothers_argued….jpg)

>>18432770 (pb)

>>18478911 (pb)

>>18588438 (pb)

Marist Brothers lose bid to use paedophile’s death as shield against child abuse claims

Christopher Knaus - 5 May 2023

A Catholic order has lost its latest attempt to use the death of a known paedophile clergy member to shield itself from allegations of child sexual abuse after a judge found that allowing such a course would “bring the administration of justice into disrepute”.

In recent months, the Guardian has revealed how the Catholic church, in particular its Marist Brothers and Christian Brothers orders, is increasingly using the deaths of clergy members to argue for permanent stays of cases brought by abuse survivors in the civil courts.

The church, which for decades covered up sexual abuse and thwarted justice for victims and survivors, has been emboldened by a win in New South Wales’s highest court last year, which found a perpetrator’s death made a fair trial impossible.

In a more recent case, the Marist Brothers argued that the death of notorious paedophile Brother Francis “Romuald” Cable rendered it unable to fairly defend itself from a civil claim by a survivor known by the pseudonym of Mark Peters, because it can no longer call Cable as a witness.

The Marist Brothers made that argument despite the fact that Cable was alive for 22 months after Peters first notified it of his claim. After learning of Peters’s claim in October 2020, it did nothing to seek a response from Cable before he died in September 2022. Cable was 88 years old and behind bars when the Marist Brothers learned of the impending case.

On Friday, the NSW supreme court rejected the church’s attempts to use Cable’s death to justify a permanent stay.

“The defendant should not, in my view, have the benefit of its own inaction,” justice Nicholas Chen found.

“The defendant’s alleged inability to meaningfully deal with the claim is, I find, a product of its own unreasonable failure to attempt to make contact with Cable, and to take steps to secure his evidence.

“In my view, to accept otherwise would, adopting what was said by [former chief justice Thomas Bathurst], ‘itself bring the administration of justice into disrepute’.”

Court documents allege the Marist Brothers have known of abuse complaints against Cable since 1967, but concealed his crimes from police and other authorities for decades and instead shuffled him between its schools, where he continued to abuse children.

The Marist Brothers argued to the court that it didn’t seek a response from Cable to Peters’s allegations while he was alive because he had earlier rebuffed them in 2015 and said he did not want to have any more contact with the order’s leadership team.

But the court rejected that submission for five separate reasons. It found that 2015 was a particularly sensitive time for Cable, given he had just been convicted for child abuse and was awaiting sentence, meaning he may have been more likely to want to talk five years later, if the Marist Brothers had attempted to contact him again.

The court also found that Cable may have been willing to talk to a lawyer or investigator, rather than a member of Marist’s leadership team.

Cable had also subsequently pleaded guilty to a raft of other child abuse charges in the period after the Marist Brothers approached him in 2015. He knew he would likely be in jail until he died, the court found. That “suggests that Cable, if contacted, may well have agreed to discuss what happened to the plaintiff”.

“At an absolute minimum, I consider that the defendant should have attempted – on an ongoing basis – contact with Cable following the letter notifying the defendant of the plaintiff’s intent to commence proceedings in 2020, and those steps should have been intensified once proceedings had been commenced,” Chen ruled.

“As it happens, nothing was done by the defendant to ascertain whether Cable would speak to them, their lawyers or investigators about the plaintiff’s claim.

“I do not accept that the defendant can simply stand back and do nothing, which is what has occurred here.”

It is unclear whether the Marist Brothers will attempt to appeal the ruling. But the win allows Peters to proceed with his case and either agree to a settlement or take it to trial.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/05/marist-brothers-lose-bid-to-use-paedophiles-death-as-shield-against-child-abuse-claims

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800871

File: 6fb04bef65be01a⋯.jpg (93.61 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_Therapeutic_Goods_Admi….jpg)

Ivermectin ban ended by Australian regulator amid warning it should not be used as Covid treatment

Josh Taylor - 5 May 2023

The Therapeutic Goods Administration has ended a ban on off-label prescriptions of anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, nearly two years after floods of people attempted to procure the drug in the mistaken belief it would treat Covid-19.

The TGA announced on Wednesday it would remove the ban for off-label prescriptions of the drug from 1 June. Off-label prescriptions had been limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious disease specialists since September 2021.

The decision was made due to what the TGA said was “sufficient evidence that the safety risks to individuals and public health is low” in the “current health climate”.

The high rates of vaccination against Covid-19 in Australia and high hybrid immunity meant that use of the drug by people was “unlikely to now compromise public health” including the risk of potential shortages of the drug for its stated use for treating river blindness, threadworm of the intestines, and scabies.

But the regulator stressed the lifting of the ban did not amount to an endorsement of off-label prescribing of ivermectin to treat Covid-19, citing studies showing it was not an effective treatment.

“A large number of clinical studies have demonstrated ivermectin does not improve outcomes in patients with Covid-19. The National Covid Evidence Taskforce (NCET) and many similar bodies around the world, including the World Health Organization, strongly advises against the use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of Covid-19.”

At the time of the ban, off-label prescriptions of ivermectin for Covid-19 were being discussed quietly in Facebook and Telegram communities, with people sharing the names of sympathetic doctors who were willing to prescribe it. The TGA said at the time it was concerned that people could be taking unsafe doses of the drug if following advice from social media.

There had been a three-to-fourfold increase in ivermectin prescriptions in the months in the lead up to the ban sparking shortages, and a tenfold increase in people seeking to import the drug. Pharmacists also reported a rise in people presenting for prescriptions and not saying what it was sought for.

Westmead hospital in Sydney also reported at the time a patient was admitted after overdosing on ivermectin and a cocktail of other claimed Covid-19 cures found online.

One of the major political proponents of the treatment – Clive Palmer’s United Australia party - heralded in a tweet the lifting of the ban as a victory, saying Palmer and Craig Kelly “spoke out bravely in [the] face of relentless attacks from governments and government agencies”, and called for a royal commission into the Covid-19 response.

The TGA said the decision to lift the ban took into account advice from the independent advisory committee on medicines scheduling, and two rounds of public consultation.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/05/ivermectin-ban-ended-by-australian-regulator-amid-warning-it-should-not-be-used-as-covid-treatment

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18800905

File: b7f118649b92734⋯.jpg (237.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,MRF_D_Marines_and_Sailors_….jpg)

File: 6a47f90da88fd24⋯.jpg (228.88 KB,1279x719,1279:719,MRF_D_Marines_and_Sailors_….jpg)

File: 96dc326ce9d783e⋯.jpg (217.22 KB,1280x721,1280:721,MRF_D_Marines_and_Sailors_….jpg)

File: a27ddfcfd4fb254⋯.jpg (112.34 KB,1024x768,4:3,Colonel_Brendan_Sullivan_a….jpg)

>>18676841

Inside the US Marine Corps training mission in Australia

Tom Minear - May 5, 2023

Exclusive: The US Marines are helping the Australian Army sharpen its amphibious warfighting capability during a six-month mission down under that is preparing both countries to respond to Chinese military aggression.

The Army’s 1st Brigade, based in Darwin, is tapping into the expertise of up to 2500 Marines as the unit is redesigned to specialise in littoral combat in coastal areas that will be crucial in any Indo-Pacific conflict.

The Marines – who arrived in the Northern Territory for their 12th annual rotation in March – specialise in amphibious operations and are also in the middle of a major transformation to match China’s armed forces.

Colonel Brendan Sullivan, the commanding officer of this year’s Marine rotational force, said this year’s training exercises in Australia and the surrounding region offered “incredible opportunities”.

Asked if they were seeking to replicate potential conflict scenarios in the South China Sea, the Pacific Islands or the Taiwan Strait, Colonel Sullivan said that was something “we’re grappling with right now” as the Marines sought to project force across a greater range.

“We’re going through a force design process where we’re trying to achieve the force that we think we’re going to need to have in the years ahead … and trying to get after some of the challenges that we think are associated in those operating environments,” he said.

“We’re trying to posture so that we can be ready to operate in that type of environment in the near future.”

This year’s Marine exercises include Predator’s Run in the Northern Territory and Melville Island, north of Darwin.

“That’s really reflecting the shift in focus for the 1st Brigade into a more littoral manoeuvre focus, which is right up the Marine Corps’ alley,” Colonel Sullivan said.

A key priority of the Australian government’s Defence Strategic Review, released last month, was that the Army be “transformed and optimised for littoral manoeuvre operations by sea, land and air”, including with the fast-tracked acquisition of new landing craft.

Captain Mitchell Livingstone, the commanding officer at Australia’s Northern Command headquarters, said training alongside the Marines offered major benefits for his soldiers.

“Working with the Marines gives us access to technology and skills and a broader understanding of the bigger picture, and what that does is improve interoperability across the whole ADF,” he said.

Colonel Sullivan said Australia’s mix of coastal, jungle and desert areas offered “superb training” environments which the Marines could not “find anywhere else in the world”.

This year’s rotation, which runs until October, will take the Marines across Australia as well as into Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, including for training on humanitarian missions which Colonel Sullivan said loomed as their most likely real-world operations.

“One of the key aspects of why we’re here is to promote peace and stability throughout the region,” he said.

“This alliance is like no other. There’s no better ally for the United States and there’s no more interoperable partner for the Marine Corps than the ADF.”

https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/national/inside-the-us-marine-corps-training-mission-in-australia/news-story/362f610279169c67417fc872a045373a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18801113

File: 29fb86d96355e40⋯.jpg (362.43 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,A_new_era_of_diplomacy_beg….jpg)

>>18784945

Note from Washington: Forget Mr Ambassador – call him Kevin Everywhere

Farrah Tomazin - May 5, 2023

Washington: A new era of diplomacy began two weeks ago when Kevin Rudd presented his credentials to President Joe Biden at the White House, marking the official start of his term as Australia’s 23rd ambassador to the US.

Since then, the former prime minister has wasted no time making his mark. On Saturday, Rudd was one of more than 2000 guests at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, listening to Biden poke fun at everything from Fox News and Rupert Murdoch to Donald Trump’s most extreme supporters. On Tuesday, he was on the other side of the country at a high-level conference in LA, warning the US it had five years to deter China from going to war with Taiwan. And throughout the past few weeks, he has spent countless hours on Capitol Hill, wooing politicians from all sides of the aisle – from former Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney to Democrats Joe Courtney and Dick Durbin, the co-chairs of the Congressional Friends of Australia Caucus. He’s Kevin Everywhere.

All this is barely scratching the surface. “He’s been really aggressive – in a good way – in terms of reaching up to the Hill,” Courtney told me after he caught up with Rudd last week, when they discussed the AUKUS submarine pact and his “clear-eyed view of the challenge in the Indo-Pacific”.

“It is clear he is a legislator in his bones. He’s definitely in his element when he’s talking to members of both houses, and I was very impressed with his perspective on China, which is about as well informed as anyone in the West.”

The next few months will no doubt be different for the Australian embassy’s 300-odd staff in America. Rudd’s predecessor, Arthur Sinodinos, worked hard behind the scenes to help facilitate AUKUS and bolster home-grown trade and investment in the US. (He also held his own against his “most amusing but hardest-to-handle” dinner guest Boris Johnson, who would barely stop talking once he sat at the table.) But Sinodinos – who has now landed a job with business advisory firm The Asia Group – was also pretty low key and rarely put himself in the spotlight.

His gregarious predecessor, Joe Hockey, on the other hand, was known for his love of social soirées and courting the media, not to mention rounds of golf with then-president Donald Trump.

Rudd now brings his own style of diplomacy to the job. He’s the first former Australian prime minister to take up the role of US ambassador, immediately boosting Canberra’s diplomatic clout in DC. He’s also the former head of New York-based think tank the Asia Society, and has a doctorate from Oxford University on Chinese President Xi Jinping – which is pretty useful in a town where few things unite Democrats and Republicans more than potential threats from Beijing.

But some have nonetheless questioned whether Rudd’s celebrity status and strong opinions could be risky in the buttoned-down world of foreign diplomacy. Would he be haunted by his past attacks on the Murdoch media empire, which included describing Rupert Murdoch – who owns large swaths of the US press – as an “an arrogant cancer on our democracy”? How might he deal with Trump, currently the Republican frontrunner for the 2024 White House nomination, whom Rudd once described as the “most destructive president in history”?

And who could forget the rhetorical attacks of his own Labor colleagues in the aftermath of his leadership battle with Julia Gillard, when folks like former NSW premier Kristina Keneally described him as a “psychopathic narcissist” and former attorney-general Nicola Roxon claimed staffers and public servants who worked for him “were burnt through like wildfire”?

So far, our new ambassador has deftly avoided controversy while settling into the new gig. At his first (and so far only) press conference with Australian journalists in Washington, for instance, Rudd refused to be drawn on questions regarding Fox News’ whopping $1 billion-plus defamation payout for spreading election lies, or what he might do if Trump returns to office.

He did, however, settle a lingering question: how should Americans refer to him? Given their love of past titles – Trump for example is still referred to as “president” and retired military brass are referred to by their rank – should he be called prime minister or ambassador? “Hopefully, Kevin,” he replied. “I’m from Queensland – that’s pretty formal up there. But they can call me whatever they like.”

Kevin Everywhere seems apt for now.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/note-from-washington-forget-mr-ambassador-call-him-kevin-everywhere-20230504-p5d5nh.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18801116

File: 15cab69c3269621⋯.jpg (614.49 KB,825x1416,275:472,KR_20.jpg)

File: 833fe7012a0acde⋯.jpg (190.66 KB,1200x1600,3:4,FvU_7ePXgAEz7hn.jpg)

>>18784945

Kevin Rudd AC Tweet

Great to catch up with @johnpodesta (senior adviser to @POTUS for clean energy innovation & implementation) ahead of President Biden’s visit to Australia in May. We need to maximise (Australia) & (United States) collaboration on climate solutions & the renewable energy transition

https://twitter.com/AmboRudd/status/1654297632624324609

https://qalerts.pub/?q=podesta

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18804767

File: ee0a2d9ccb73012⋯.mp4 (15.85 MB,640x360,16:9,Saucon_Valley_must_allow_A….mp4)

>>18454343 (pb)

>>18472824 (pb)

Saucon Valley must allow After School Satan Club to meet, judge rules

Rob Manch - May 1, 2023

L. SAUCON TWP., Pa. - Federal judge John Gallagher ruled Monday the After School Satan Club can begin holding meetings at Saucon Valley Middle School.

The long-awaited decision said the Saucon Valley School District violated the First Amendment when it revoked the club's approval. In his opinion, Judge Gallagher recognized the difficulty Superintendent Jaime Vlasaty faced following a shooting threat related to the Satan Club, calling her position "unenviable."

But the judge also said the suppression of the club's speech was not "Constitutionally permissible." Now, more than two months after its approval was revoked, the club is planning to hold its first meeting as early as next week.

"We're very happy that the First Amendment prevailed this morning," said Sara Rose, Deputy Director for the ACLU of Pennsylvania, which represented the Satanic Temple in court.

Rose said the school district tried to argue the After School Satan Club didn't follow its advertising rules by not explicitly saying they weren't endorsed by the district, but the ACLU was able to prove a double standard.

"I think the most powerful piece of evidence that we had on the Satanic Temple's side was the fact that their advertisement was so similar to that of the Good News Club," said Rose.

The Good News Club is the Christian club in the district.

"They're both religious clubs, they're both having meetings in the same room at essentially the same time after school. One was okay and one wasn't, and I think that created a lot of questions in the court's mind," said Rose.

Now, the After School Satan Club is hoping to hold its first meeting as early as next week.

"The judge ordered the parties to come up with some new meeting dates in the event that he ruled in favor of the club, so we did that, and the first one will be May 10 with two subsequent dates in May," said Rose.

And even though the School Board recently changed the rules for third-party clubs, requiring them to meet no earlier than 6 p.m., Rose said the ruling allows the After School Satan Club to meet at the originally agreed-upon 3:05 p.m.

"I believe that the judge indicated in his opinion that the club will be able to meet at the originally agreed-upon time," said Rose.

The After School Satan Club also has plans to expand to other school districts, and Rose said she hopes they're paying attention to this case before they try to stop it.

"Instead of going to court and engaging in very costly and time-consuming litigation, that school districts will just go ahead and allow the club to meet on the same terms that other religious clubs are allowed to meet at these schools," said Rose.

We reached out to Superintendent Vlasaty for a comment Monday, but we did not immediately hear back. It's not clear at this time if the school district is planning to seek any more legal action, or if it plans to immediately allow the Satan Club to start meeting again next week.

https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/lehighvalley/saucon-valley-must-allow-after-school-satan-club-to-meet-judge-rules/article_d00805fe-e83c-11ed-bfc8-43c2391b98cc.html

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/wfmz.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/34/f3481b9a-e840-11ed-b27d-5ffb54e65783/644fef229ec1b.file.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18804793

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18804767

Boston SatanCon-goers shred Bible, pro-cop flag during opening ritual: ‘Hail Satan!’

One of the Satanist leaders also took a hammer to a keyboard

Jon Brown - April 30, 2023

A group of Satanists cheered as two leaders opened SatanCon 2023 on Friday with a formal ceremony renouncing "symbols of oppression" by ripping up a Bible and a "Thin Blue Line" flag representing police.

"We stand here today in defiance of their siege and destroy their symbols of oppression," a female leader told the crowd before ripping pages out of the Bible and throwing them on the floor, video showed.

A male leader joined her in then tearing a "Thin Blue Line" flag in two, which they also tossed on the floor while the crowd cheered. Satanists in attendance later picked some of the ripped pages off the floor and posed with them for pictures.

"We must build true community outside of the virtual," the male leader also said before taking a hammer to a keyboard. "Rebelling comes in many forms to each and their own within their own capabilities and their own situation. For some of us, merely existing one more day is victory, but for those of us who can, we must stand up for those who cannot."

SatanCon, a sold-out three-day event has been touted as the "largest satanic gathering in history," is being hosted this weekend at the Marriott Copley Place in Boston by The Satanic Temple. The event, which marks the Temple's 10-year anniversary, was dedicated to Democratic Boston Mayor Michelle Wu after the group wasn't allowed to deliver a satanic invocation at a City Council meeting in 2021.

The Temple claims to be a nontheistic religious organization that does not worship or believe in a personal Satan, but rather aims to "encourage benevolence and empathy, reject tyrannical authority, advocate practical common sense, oppose injustice, and undertake noble pursuits."

The conference has been replete with numerous guest speakers and lectures, many of which were dedicated to far-left identity politics.

"Sins of the Flesh: Satanism and Self-Pleasure" was taught by Eric Sprankle, a "sexuality studies" professor at Minnesota State University-Mankato. "Reclaiming the Trans Body: A/theistic strategies for Self-Determination and Empowerment," was offered by Devi B. Dillard-Wright, a transgender woman who served as University of South Carolina-Aiken Associate Professor of Philosophy until July 2022.

Another event included "Hellbillies: Visible Satanism in Rural America," which will be taught by Ash Schade, a transgender man who made headlines when he had a baby "after hooking up with someone on Grindr," according to The College Fix.

SatanCon has been met with pushback from some Christian groups such as Intercessors for America, whose regional leaders in Boston told the Christian Post they felt called to pray for the souls of the attendees.

The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston also called for "intense prayer" in response to the event, according to Catholic News Agency. The archdiocese advised Catholics to avoid engaging with the Satanists at the event.

"We ask Catholics not to organize or encourage others to go to the event to protest. It will only make it more prominent and give the organizers the attention they seek," a press release from the archdiocese said.

"Rather than protesting in person, we hope to storm the Heavens with prayer from our shrines, monasteries, and parishes," the archdiocese continued, and offered a list of places to pray with other Catholics over the weekend the convention takes place.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/boston-satancon-goers-shred-bible-pro-cop-flag-during-opening-ritual-hail-satan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxVZ8wxTydQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18804800

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18804793

Un-Baptism Ceremony Held at "Biggest Satanic Gathering" at Boston SatanCon

FREEDOMNEWS TV

Apr 29, 2023

BOSTON, Massachusetts - Un-Baptism ceremony was held at The Little Black Chapel of Satanic Temple during the 10th anniversary SatanCon event in Boston on Friday afternoon.

Earlier in the day a satanic naming ceremony was held this afternoon at the Marriott in Boston for the 10th annual SatanCon.

Individuals walked up to a center altar where they chose a name to be identified by and the group chanted, "hail Satan." The individuals then received an upside-down cross on their foreheads before making devil horns with their hands and walking toward a cheering crowd.

The event was held in "the Little Black Chapel" which is set up in one of the conference rooms in the hotel.

Video by Oliya ScooterCaster and Sam Hartson (Freedomnews.tv)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX20jhoZKgs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18804816

File: 6d0789a86bb8aef⋯.jpg (744.58 KB,852x1489,852:1489,Q_4627.jpg)

File: 854248dc16ec5ff⋯.jpg (76.96 KB,960x960,1:1,EgCocuoXsAANrRi.jpg)

File: dc7b6550cd470ba⋯.jpg (718.33 KB,852x892,213:223,Q_4429.jpg)

File: 7e90d7f936b0ab6⋯.jpg (254.59 KB,852x674,426:337,Q_4396.jpg)

File: 0be73ce8c1e97b4⋯.jpg (119.42 KB,1920x1080,16:9,200601_1591066627421.jpg)

>>18804767

>>18804793

>>18804800

Q Post #4627

Aug 26 2020 12:23:33 (EST)

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1297521970813317121

One party discusses God.

One party discusses Darkness.

One party promotes God.

One party eliminates God.

Symbolism will be their downfall.

The Great Deceiver(s).

When was the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader being Patriotic [exhibiting National Pride (love of Country)]?

When was the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader 'speak out against' the riots [violence in the streets]?

When was the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader support those who took an oath to protect and defend?

When was the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader support and call for UNITY across our Nation?

ALL ASSETS DEPLOYED.

INFORMATION WARFARE.

INFILTRATION.

DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA.

Have Faith in Humanity.

Have Faith in Yourself.

UNITED WE STAND.

GOD WINS.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4627

Q Post #4429

Jun 6 2020 13:32:28 (EST)

https://s3.amazonaws.com/lifesite/Open_Letter_President_Donald_Trump.pdf

The Armor of God

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. 17 Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people.

Have faith in Humanity.

Have faith in Yourself.

Have faith in God.

The Great Awakening.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4429

https://web.archive.org/web/20211102220931/https://s3.amazonaws.com/lifesite/Open_Letter_President_Donald_Trump.pdf

Q Post #4396

Jun 3 2020 01:44:26 (EST)

God wins.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4396

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18805504

File: fb7ac0763e35ece⋯.jpg (2.69 MB,5568x3712,3:2,_God_save_Virginia_Giuffre….jpg)

File: 8fb35ac675f1370⋯.jpg (1.89 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Protesters_stood_side_by_s….jpg)

File: 10771fb2939e305⋯.jpg (4.56 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Republic_held_a_Not_My_Kin….jpg)

File: ed58d0c0c5a3c90⋯.jpg (173.15 KB,852x376,213:94,Q_4923.jpg)

'God save Virginia Giuffre': Protesters wave placards on Coronation route

Protesters have gathered in London to oppose the coronation of King Charles, standing side by side with royal fans who flocked to the capital.

Ellen Manning - 6 May 2023

Anti-monarchy protesters continued their demonstrations during King Charles's coronation ceremony as hundreds of activists were confronted by police in central London.

Hundreds of anti-royalists were prevented from entering Trafalgar Square by police as a volley of arrests of both republicans and Just Stop Oil protesters were made, sparking concern over the 'low threshold' adopted by the Met Police.

Protesters had joined royal supporters waiting for the coronation procession to pass, brandishing placards, with the groups offering rival chants to one another.

Scotland Yard said several people had been arrested on suspicion of offences including breaching the peace and conspiracy to cause public nuisance close to the coronation.

In a statement on Twitter, the force said: "A significant police operation is under way in central London.

"We have made a number of arrests in the area of Carlton House Terrace. The individuals have been held on suspicion of breaching the peace.

"Earlier today we arrested four people in the area of St Martin’s Lane. They were held on suspicion of conspiracy to cause public nuisance. We seized lock-on devices.

"A further three people were arrested in the area of Wellington Arch. They were held on suspicion of possessing articles to cause criminal damage. There will be further updates later today."

The arrests come after the force announced it would have an "extremely low threshold" for protests during the coronation celebrations, and that demonstrators could expect "swift action".

Its policing operation was set to see 11,500 police officers on duty on Saturday.

In Trafalgar Square, chants of “Not my king” from a group of anti-monarchists were met by boos and opposing chants of “God save the King”.

Protesters stood shoulder to shoulder with royal supporters - the former dressed in yellow waving placards with slogans including “king parasite” and “abolish the monarchy”, while the latter were bedecked in Union flags.

One placard read: "God save Virginia Giuffre", a reference to the alleged sexual abuse case involving Prince Andrew, who settled a case with Giuffre in February last year.

Footage posted on Twitter seemed to show demonstrators in yellow "Not My King" t-shirts being arrested by police.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/coronation-protests-pictures-capture-the-uncomfortable-side-of-king-charles-big-day-094038452.html

Q Post #4923

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4923

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18810233

File: cc2b219205dc5af⋯.jpg (117.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Britain_s_Prince_Andrew_Du….jpg)

File: ff0de7f3c9d5865⋯.jpg (108.85 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prince_Andrew_was_reported….jpg)

File: ba845f6a6e93dae⋯.jpg (336.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_ceremony_was_discretel….jpg)

File: 3fe36ce537a0efc⋯.jpg (348.82 KB,852x929,852:929,Q_3152.jpg)

File: 8251808450d23cb⋯.jpg (30.46 KB,620x413,620:413,Prince_Andrew_with_designe….jpg)

>>18805504

Frozen-out Andrew gets an equally chilly reception from crowd

MEGAN AGNEW, THE TIMES - MAY 7, 2023

As the King travelled to Westminster Abbey in a golden carriage, to huge cheers and the drumbeat of a military procession, his brother, Prince Andrew, was driven down the Mall in a car alone – and booed by crowds.

Andrew was reportedly “left in the dark” until the last moment about whether he would be allowed to wear his ceremonial Knight of the Garter robes - and was “furious”. In the end, the late Queen’s second son got his way, walking into the abbey in a floor-length velvet robe, red sash and gold tassels.

But his position during the service left a little to be desired, three rows back and jammed against a pillar, in the armpit of the abbey. He was notably absent from the remainder of the day.

Andrew, the eighth in line to the throne but no longer a working royal, is everything the “modernising” Charles and millennial William do not want for the royal family. Known for his pomposity and big spending, the prince went from “Randy Andy” to being associated with a convicted paedophile and facing allegations of sexual assault.

As a result, the royals seem to be involved in a silent, smiling street tussle: the Firm desperately but cordially trying to shunt him to the back of the pack, without being so obvious as to suggest he might be guilty, while he keeps pushing his way forward, seemingly oblivious to the reality of his reputation. So what do you do with a problem like Prince Andrew?

As the Duke of York walked into Westminster Abbey on Saturday, he took the lead down the aisle, ahead of his daughters, nodding and smiling to the guests. Prince Harry, who walked in with the same group, managed to put some distance between himself and Andrew, hanging back to walk alone.

The ceremony was discretely tweaked so Andrew did not play a role. The Homage of Royal Blood would have seen the dukes kneeling before the King and vowing to be his “liege man”. It was streamlined, however, to just Prince William.

Andrew was not included in the procession behind the King and Queen’s Gold State Coach to Buckingham Palace and did not go onto the balcony for the fly-past.

The duke stepped back from royal duties in 2019 after a disastrous BBC Newsnight interview and his brother and nephew are said to oppose any public-facing role.

In 2015, Virginia Giuffre claimed she was forced to have sex with Andrew when she was 17 and he was a guest of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Andrew has always denied the allegations. An out-of-court settlement was reached with Giuffre in March last year - a reported pounds 3 million - in which he accepted no blame.

Andrew was stripped of his military affiliations and royal patronages, a decision that left him “utterly bereft”. Behind the scenes, he is also being frozen out of the Firm. It is believed his pounds 249,000 annual allowance from the Duchy of Lancaster was cut last month, although he was left a substantial inheritance by his mother, as well as cash from selling his £19 million chalet in Verbier. Now he is unemployed, said biographer Nigel Cawthorne, Andrew is “Lord High Dogwalker, keeper of the royal corgis” – he and his ex-wife inherited Queen Elizabeth’s dogs Muick and Sandy, who were seen enjoying afternoon tea on Friday with Sarah Ferguson.

But Andrew is said to be recruiting a new communications team and has contacted lawyers with information that “will change people’s perceptions of him”. He has been accused of trying to “worm his way back into public life”, attending the Royal Victorian Order party in March, where he wore his Knight of the Garter robes, and the Easter church service, where he manoeuvred himself immediately behind the King.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/frozenout-andrew-gets-an-equally-chilly-reception-from-crowd/news-story/90a8c725856c24fab7ffdde270596deb

Q Post #3152

Mar 20 2019 22:05:27 (EST)

Prince Andrew is deeply connected.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3152

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18810246

File: 5351d08bc9f1563⋯.jpg (120.88 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Australian_journalist_Chen….jpg)

File: 8b31becf2f52f9b⋯.jpg (107.1 KB,1023x682,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18744498

‘Missing her kids’: Aussie journalist Cheng Lei reaches 1000 days in Chinese jail

Eryk Bagshaw - May 7, 2023

1/2

For almost 1000 days Australian journalist Cheng Lei has woken up inside a Chinese cell, cut off from her two young children in Melbourne and her friends in Beijing. Each day she wakes up still unaware of the crime she is alleged to have committed, in a country that she had devoted her professional life to, that now only gives her two hours a day of fresh air.

The 48-year-old’s conditions are better now than the sheer isolation of her first six months, but still, as the Australian government welcomes Chinese officials and business delegations search for new opportunities, Cheng remains behind bars on vague national security charges. Her kids, 11 and 14, wonder when they will get their mum back.

“The 1000 days [milestone] is going to be really tough for her,” said Cheng’s partner Nick Coyle. “She misses her children enormously. ”

That mark will be reached on Tuesday. It will inevitably be the same as each of the 999 before; a daily, exhausting grind to manage any expectations that today might be the day she is released, while not losing all hope when those expectations are dashed.

The Australian government says it has raised her case and that of fellow detained Australian Yang Hengjun with their Chinese counterparts at every opportunity. But every few months a familiar announcement is made. Their sentencing dates are extended for another three months, leaving the pair in limbo and their families exasperated.

“We’re starting to get the relationship back on track to a degree, but we need to see some outcomes,” said Coyle. “This really needs to get solved.”

Australian leaders now face a difficult balancing act. Canberra has stabilised the relationship with Beijing and some of the trade restrictions on Australian exports after years of diplomatic tension are gradually being unwound. But the Chinese government has not made any public concessions on the fate of Cheng and Yang, meaning official visits to Beijing by a minister or state premier to boost ties can risk reducing the incentive for either to be released.

“The government has to engage,” said Coyle. “Of course, business is going to want to engage, but if you want to bring the Australian public along with you on that journey, then, seeing some fruit for the labour involved in repairing the relationship needs to happen.”

Trade Minister Don Farrell said last Monday he was due to go to Beijing “very soon” but did not specify a date.

“I don’t want to go to China just for the sake of going to China,” he said. “I want to go to make sure that we are making progress on all of these outstanding issues that we’ve got in terms of our trading relationship.”

Farrell was mostly talking about ongoing restrictions on Australian wine and other exports, but Coyle wants the Australian government to make it explicit that Cheng’s fate can’t be separated from the broader economy.

“This is the sort of issue that can’t be divorced from the trade relationship,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18810248

File: da90c1dc9f02c1c⋯.jpg (485 KB,1200x1600,3:4,Canadian_Michael_Kovrig_ho….jpg)

>>18810246

2/2

For China, the optics of the ongoing detention of Cheng and Yang, along with a growing list of foreign detainees, are challenging as it attempts to secure foreign investment to kick-start its sluggish economy. In March, state security officers visited American corporate research company the Mintz Group and detained five local employees. The same month, a senior Japanese pharmaceutical company official in Beijing was detained on spying charges. In April, they knocked on the door of American consulting firm Bain & Company and questioned their employees.

Australian businesses in China have not reported increased visits from state security in the past few months, but the American Chamber of Commerce told The New York Times on Thursday that its business community was becoming increasingly nervous after a series of visits “without any explanation as to why”.

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has defended the mystery of its legal system, which keeps its detainees guessing, and courts sealed as they go through years without trial and sentencing. In April, Cheng’s sentencing date was extended for another three months, the fifth time her sentencing had been delayed. Yang’s sentence has been delayed seven times. In cases involving foreigners in China, a formal sentence can be a positive sign as it allows the detainee to be extradited to their home country.

“China is a country under the rule of law, and the Chinese judiciary departments handle the cases in accordance with the law,” spokeswoman Mao Ning said in December in response to questions about Cheng and Yang.“The legitimate rights of the people involved are fully guaranteed.”

Frustrated with the lack of progress, the campaign to free Cheng and Yang is now reaching a wider audience.

On Tuesday in London, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese raised Cheng’s case, unprompted, with British talk show host Piers Morgan. He name-checked Chinese President Xi Jinping and his responsibility for the case in the process.

“Our position on China has been to engage constructively but to continue to put forward that the impediments to trade should be removed, to say very directly to President Xi, that Australians such as Cheng Lei, need to be given proper justice, and that they’re not receiving that at the moment,” he said.

On the same day in Washington, Michael Kovrig, one of Canada’s Two Michaels, carried a photo of Cheng to a gathering of hostages’ families and supporters. Kovrig and Michael Spavor were released in September 2021 in a prisoner swap with Huawei executive Meng Wenzhou after spending 1019 days in jail on vague national security charges.

Cheng’s supporters hope it won’t take much longer to get her home.

“This has to end,” said Coyle.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/missing-her-kids-aussie-journalist-cheng-lei-reaches-1000-days-in-chinese-jail-20230504-p5d5kk.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18814604

File: de6b715ba1c57ec⋯.jpg (2.33 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

File: 3e3ca0fc8e16d92⋯.jpg (107.22 KB,1038x576,173:96,Fiji_s_Home_Affairs_Minist….jpg)

File: c94ea4d36267edc⋯.jpg (2.35 MB,1238x2453,1238:2453,The_Spokesperson_of_the_Ch….jpg)

Australia accused of undermining Fiji-China relationship, amid uncertainty over police agreement

Stephen Dziedzic - 8 May 2023

China has accused Australia of trying to sabotage its relationship with Fiji as questions swirl over whether the Pacific Island country will cut security and law enforcement ties with Beijing.

The relationship between Beijing and Suva has cooled ever since Sitiveni Rabuka won power late last year, particularly after the new prime minister reversed a decision forcing Taiwan to downgrade the official title of its diplomatic mission in Fiji.

Mr Rabuka has also repeatedly said that he will scrap a 2011 police cooperation agreement which Fiji signed with China under former prime minister Frank Bainimarama, saying he wanted to limit law enforcement ties to countries with "similar systems."

Late last week the Chinese embassy in Fiji issued its sharpest statement yet on the issue, saying it hoped "relevant parties" would "abandon ideological prejudice, and view the law enforcement and police cooperation between China and Fiji objectively and rationally".

It also took aim at the United States and Australia, suggesting that other nations had deliberately tried to disrupt China's cooperation with Fiji.

"The Chinese side sincerely hope relevant countries to make more contributions through concrete actions for Fiji and the PIC (Pacific Island countries) rather than only caring and helping the PICs out of geopolitical needs" it said.

That message was backed up by China's Special Envoy to the Pacific, Qian Bo, who told the Samoa Observer he was "surprised" by Fiji's actions, blaming "other parties" who had "interrupted" the relationship.

"We have some patience, but there is a bottom line for us that sees that we meet the core concerns of China," he said.

While Chinese diplomats have struck a stronger tone on the issue, Fiji’s senior ministers have delivered contradictory messages about the exact status of the police cooperation agreement.

On Friday, Fijian Home Affairs Minister Pio Tikoduadua — who has responsibility for the defence forces and police — denied the agreement had already been scrapped, and insisted the government was merely "reviewing" it.

"There is no termination of the agreement," he told reporters in Suva.

"We want to review the terms that govern the relationship between the government of China and Fiji with regards to security. That's what we're doing we are following the process."

And when asked about the Chinese government's criticisms of Fiji, he again stressed that no final decisions had been made.

"I am the line minister for [the agreement]. It's not at the discretion of the prime minister," he said.

The home affairs minister said that under the MoU, Fiji had to give China six months' notice before reviewing or terminating the agreement, and that he delivered that notice to the Chinese government earlier this year.

It's also not clear whether the government wants to review or scrap a separate 2014 defence agreement which focuses on border control and training.

The spike in tensions follows a diplomatic spat between China and Fiji over Mr Rabuka's decision not to meet with China's Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Ma Zhaoxu when he visited Suva last month.

That frustrated Chinese officials, although the Chinese embassy in Fiji played down the episode in its most recent statement, saying it "respected" the prime minister's decision.

Earlier this year Mr Rabuka also told the ABC he had asked Fijian officials to investigate claims by then president of Federated States of Micronesia David Panuelo that he had been followed by Chinese spies while visiting Suva.

But the prime minister's office has not yet said whether that investigation has now finished, or revealed what the investigation unearthed.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-08/china-accuses-australia-of-sabotaging-fiji-relationship/102317374

http://fj.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/sgxw/202305/t20230504_11070319.htm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18814613

File: 3fc405356bd6e54⋯.jpg (68.6 KB,1280x721,1280:721,A_DJI_Phantom_4_drone.jpg)

File: 0b0b7f0dd582304⋯.jpg (131.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,ADF_chief_General_Angus_Ca….jpg)

>>18708561

Australian Border Force called to suspend Chinese DJI drones in-line with ADF

The Australian Border Force’s use of drones made by a controversial Chinese company has raised major security concerns.

Clare Armstrong - May 8, 2023

A Chinese-made drone grounded by Defence and black-listed by the US military is still being used by the Australian Border Force sparking fears the high-risk technology could compromise the agency’s “sensitive” operations.

The Coalition is calling for the ABF to follow the Australian Defence Force in suspending the use of drones and other products manufactured by controversial Chinese company Da Jiang Innovations (DJI) pending a security audit.

It can be revealed the ABF has purchased 41 DJI drones since 2017, including 37 acquired between February and June last year, many of which are currently being used part of a trial exploring how remote systems could enhance its operational capability.

The agency also has hundreds of batteries, controllers, charging stations and several thermal and night vision cameras produced by DJI.

The use of this equipment was banned in the US by the Pentagon more than six months ago due to concerns about the Chinese company’s possible military links and cyber security vulnerabilities.

Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said the US moved against DJI because the company was “controlled by the People’s Liberation Army” and had been sanctioned “for their involvement in the Chinese Communist Party’s repression of Uyghurs in Xinjiang”.

After it was revealed the ADF was using hundreds of DJI drones, the federal government last month ordered an audit to identify, remove and ban any technology considered inappropriate.

But on Friday Defence Department secretary Greg Moriarty and Chief of the Defence Force General Angus Campbell reportedly signed an order to suspend the use of all DJI products until the government-ordered audit was completed.

Mr Paterson said the ABF should “follow their colleagues” in the ADF and cease flying the Chinese-made drones pending a similar review.

“If it’s not safe to use in our military it should be nowhere near our highly sensitive border protection operations either,” he said.

“The Albanese government should urgently investigate lower-risk alternatives to DJI for all Commonwealth departments and agencies.”

All Chinese companies headquartered in the country, like DJI, must comply with 2017 national security laws requiring them to hand over data at the request of China’s intelligence agencies.

In response to a Question on Notice the ABF confirmed it has purchased of 41 DJI drones and 379 other accessories manufactured by the controversial company in the past six years as part of a trial.

“In 2020, the Australian Border Force (ABF) identified a potential role for Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) to enhance and complement the ABF’s existing capabilities, and align with other law enforcement and border control agencies utilising RPAS,” a statement from Home Affairs responding to the question said.

“In 2021, the ABF established an RPAS Capability Project to test, trial and implement an RPAS capability for the agency.

“Due to the impact of Covid-19, the project has been delayed and currently remains in the trial stage.”

Asked if the ABF would ground its DJI fleet, an ABF spokesman said the technology trial was not “embedded” in current operations.

“The ABF adheres to strict cyber security measures with DJI technology to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availability of all official information generated through or during the use of this technology,” he said.

“The ABF is working closely with partner agencies on its RPAS cyber security measures to ensure they remain contemporary and fit-for-purpose.”

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/victoria/australian-border-force-called-to-suspend-chinese-dji-drones-inline-with-adf/news-story/5dd4b8178ea3883d2f608a1db3e2a112

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18814626

File: 1fb08faeb9e10a3⋯.jpg (249.85 KB,The_Board_of_Inquiry_was_s….jpg)

File: fe4893d06bfaedc⋯.jpg (151.29 KB,Lisa_Wilkinson_s_Logies_sp….jpg)

File: 95aebb8e5680126⋯.jpg (1.73 MB,Bruce_Lehrmann_attended_th….jpg)

>>18708667

ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold takes the stand on first day of Board of Inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's trial

Patrick Bell and Elizabeth Byrne - 8 May 2023

1/2

An inquiry into how criminal justice agencies handled the case against former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has heard journalist Lisa Wilkinson alleged she'd been treated unfairly by the ACT's top prosecutor.

Mr Lehrmann - who was accused of raping Brittany Higgins in a parliamentary office in 2019 - has maintained his innocence and there have been no findings against him.

His trial last year and subsequent plans for a retrial were both abandoned.

Documents tendered to the inquiry today have revealed correspondence between a lawyer for Wilkinson and ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold's office in December.

At the time, there were calls in some media reports for Wilkinson to face criminal proceedings for contempt of court over a speech she gave at the Logie Awards a week before Mr Lehrmann's trial was due to begin.

Wilkinson won a Logie award based on an interview she had conducted with Ms Higgins, and her victory speech ultimately prompted a stay of proceedings for Mr Lehrmann's legal team.

This was after a meeting in which Mr Drumgold told Wilkinson that any publicity could lead to a delay, but did not explicitly advise her not to give the speech, because he understood her prospects for victory to be unlikely.

"We are not speech editors … [I] can advise however that defence can re-institute a stay application in the event of publicity," Mr Drumgold wrote in notes from the meeting.

'I entirely misread the situation': Drumgold

Mr Drumgold accepted today that he did not fully comprehend the potential impact of Wilkinson's speech, should she win.

"In hindsight it was not an unlikely hypothetical … I should have paid closer attention at the time," he told the inquiry.

"I would accept that I entirely misread the situation."

In a letter to Mr Drumgold, presented at the inquiry today, Ms Wilkinson’s lawyer Marlia Saunders outlined why she felt her client had been treated unfairly.

"You have not corrected the record in relation to what occurred during the 15 June, 2022 meeting by clarifying that there was no positive direction … not to give a speech," she said.

"You've not publicly confirmed that you do not consider Ms Wilkinson's conduct amounting to contempt of court."

Mr Drumgold said it was possible he did not respond to that letter, and accepted that doing so may have displayed an appropriate level of professional courtesy.

But he rejected suggestions that he should have made public commentary of the nature Wilkinson had sought.

"Whatever sympathy I have for Ms Wilkinson, I'm not a publicist," he said.

The inquiry heard that Mr Drumgold told a court the day after the Logies, in June 2022, the notes from the pre-Logies meeting with Wilkinson were all made by a colleague at the time of the meeting five days earlier.

Counsel assisting the inquiry Erin Longbottom KC today put to Mr Drumgold that those statements were knowingly false, and that he had in fact made additional notes following the meeting.

She said he had written notes the day after the Logies - on the same day Mr Lehrmann's lawyers applied for a stay of proceedings - which described issuing a warning to Wilkinson about her speech.

He today denied being deliberately untruthful, but accepted he made an error in not distinguishing between the initial notes and the subsequent addition.

“We were talking about a whole note, I hadn’t broken it down,” he said.

“Yes, I probably should have turned my mind to the chain of who added what where.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18814632

File: a9e6f90049abb9d⋯.jpg (1.86 MB,3971x2647,3971:2647,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

File: b14a4a96bf36a45⋯.jpg (223.83 KB,1600x1108,400:277,Former_Queensland_Judge_Wa….jpg)

File: 062c6ad5ce537f5⋯.jpg (867.82 KB,4240x2832,265:177,ACT_Victims_of_Crime_Commi….jpg)

>>18814626

2/2

'It was not extraordinary'

Mr Drumgold is the first to take the stand in the inquiry after opening submissions were heard last month.

In answering questions about his prosecution of Mr Lehrmann, Mr Drumgold told the inquiry today that he had treated the matter in the same way that he had other sexual offence cases.

"From my approach, factually, it was like many other trials that I have done," he said.

"It was not extraordinary in my sense."

During an initial hearing last month, counsel assisting the inquiry Erin Longbottom said the context of Ms Higgins's allegation "seemingly affected" the way the agencies involved handled the matter.

Today Mr Drumgold said the context did place extra demands on his role, in terms of ensuring the fairness of a jury.

"I had to keep the publicity out of the courtroom, essentially," he said.

Inquiry to focus on those actions of police, prosecution

The ACT government set up the Board of Inquiry after the public release of a letter from Mr Drumgold to police in which he alleged he'd been pressed not to pursue the charge against Mr Lehrmann.

The letter was written after the trial was abandoned but before the decision not to proceed with a retrial.

It became public after the legal proceedings were over.

The charges against Mr Lehrmann, which have now been dropped, were formally laid in August 2021 over the alleged incident in March 2019.

Ms Higgins had initially gone to police soon after the alleged incident but later suspended her complaint until February 2021, when she finally gave a statement to police, after interviews with Wilkinson for the Project and Samantha Maiden for news.com.au, in which Mr Lehrmann was not named.

The inquiry, led by former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff, will not look into the details of the case but will concentrate on the actions of those running the investigation.

The terms of reference refer to whether any police officer, Mr Drumgold, or ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates, did anything outside their formal responsibilities before, during and after the prosecution.

Mr Sofronoff has said a key issue will be to decide if the prosecution should have proceeded.

Mr Sofronoff said he would have to consider the two-step threshold for charging and continuing with a prosecution, which relies on whether there is a reasonable chance of success and whether the prosecution is in the public interest.

The inquiry will also consider Mr Drumgold's actions, including his decision to discontinue the case and the circumstances of the public release of the letter from Mr Drumgold to police, which sparked the inquiry.

During the trial, ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates accompanied Ms Higgins to court each day she appeared.

The inquiry will consider whether her actions, which also included acting as an intermediary with police and prosecutors, were within her responsibilities.

It has not been all plain sailing for the inquiry, which was to have started last month.

It was delayed twice, and the reporting date will now be a month later on July 31.

Mr Lehrmann's lawyer Steve Whybrow is also expected to give evidence.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-08/shane-drumgold-takes-stand-board-of-inquiry-bruce-lehrmann-trial/102314214

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18814642

File: b0f78811bc8bc36⋯.jpg (136.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_SC_gives_ev….jpg)

File: 48e0d1766bcd4e0⋯.jpg (90.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_delivers_he….jpg)

File: ebd87a2bcc46d53⋯.jpg (120.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_the_….jpg)

>>18708667

Bruce Lehrmann attends first day of public hearings at Board of Inquiry into ACT’s criminal justice system

KRISTIN SHORTEN - MAY 8, 2023

1/2

Shane Drumgold has told the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system that he is a “prosecutor, not a publicist” over his refusal to publicly clear Lisa Wilkinson of contempt after her Logies acceptance speech delayed Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial.

On the first day of public hearings Mr Drumgold, the ACT’s Director of Public Prosecutions, is being examined about the advice he gave Ms Wilkinson about her planned speech before she won the silver Logie last year, and his communications with her lawyers after the televised speech caused Mr Lehrmann’s trial to be temporarily stayed.

Ms Wilkinson was on the witness list and expected to give evidence at Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial after Brittany Higgins accused him of sexually assaulting her in March 2019.

On June 15, 2022 the Network Ten journalist and her lawyer participated in a witness “proofing” meeting with Mr Drumgold and his colleagues in preparation for Mr Lehrmann’s trial which was set to start later that month.

The inquiry has heard that during the meeting Ms Wilkinson told Mr Drumgold about her Logies nomination before reading the speech she had prepared to read in the event that she won an award, and sought the DPP’s advice about delivering such a speech.

Under intense examination from Counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC on Monday, Mr Drumgold conceded he did not give the issue adequate attention and believed Ms Wilkinson had brought up her nomination, in part, to brag about it.

“I thought it was more about pointing out she was up for a Logie Award rather than seeking genuine advice,” he said.

“In hindsight I should have taken a different approach

“I should have listened to the whole speech and said, ‘if I was a defence lawyer I would make an application of stay on the basis of that (speech)’.”

Mr Drumgold said that Ms Wilkinson had given him the impression that she would not win the award and so he thought it was merely a “hypothetical” question.

“It was advanced to me as being unlikely (she would win),” he said.

“I accept that I entirely misread the situation.

“I thought this was somebody telling me they were up for an award for an interview. I thought that was at the heart of what was being said.

“It was qualified that (winning) was probably not going to happen and I was, not to my mind, dealing with a real issue.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18814646

File: ba6f5567bd09a4f⋯.jpg (73.8 KB,768x1024,3:4,Walter_Sofronoff.jpg)

File: be390f118f11699⋯.jpg (101.58 KB,768x1024,3:4,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

>>18814642

2/2

Mr Drumgold told the inquiry he was confident he “had made it abundantly clear” to Ms Wilkinson and her lawyers that “any publicity” could cause the trial to be stayed and he thought they had heeded his advice by abandoning the speech.

“At the conclusion of the meeting I felt confident I’d given her sufficient advice,” he said.

“That was my state of mind.”

Ms Longbottom also asked Mr Drumgold about communications he had with Mr Wilkinson’s lawyer Marlia Saunders between October and December 2022.

The inquiry heard that Ms Saunders called Mr Drumgold on October 24, 2022, while the jury in Mr Lehrmann’s trial was deliberating, asking him to make a public statement clarifying that Ms Wilkinson would not be charged with contempt of court over her Logies speech.

On December 1, Ms Saunders emailed Mr Drumgold after hearing that he planned to hold a press conference the following day, and again asked that he make a public statement to the effect that her client had not committed contempt of court some six months earlier.

On December 2, Mr Drumgold announced at a press conference that he was discontinuing proceedings against Mr Lehrmann due to concerns for Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Mr Drumgold told the inquiry he did not recall reading Ms Saunders’ email prior to his December 2 press conference but even if he had, he would not have mentioned Lisa Wilkinson while announcing his decision to drop the charge against Mr Lehrmann.

Ms Saunders attempted to call Mr Drumgold on December 5 and emailed him again on December 6.

In her various emails, Ms Saunders said that influential journalists had called for Ms Wilkinson to be charged and asked him to “correct the public record” through a public statement saying that he did “not consider her conduct to amount to contempt of court” and that he “will not pursue contempt charges against her”.

Mr Drumgold said he does not consider media reporting to be the “public record” and that the propositions in Ms Saunders’ letter “don’t require my engagement”.

“With respect, the allegation is that I’m not publicly rebutting false media reports,” he said.

“The second is that I should, probably for the first time ever, announce that no offence had been committed in a circumstance.

“Really what I’m being asked is why I’m not providing running commentary on false media.

“The suggestion she was going to be charged with contempt arose nowhere other than in the media.”

Mr Drumgold admitted he ought to have afforded Ms Saunders the professional courtesy of responding to her communications but that there was a lot going on at that time as was also being criticised in the media after discontinuing criminal proceedings against Mr Lehrmann.

“What I was being asked to do (by Ms Saunders) is completely beyond my remit,” he said.

“Whatever sympathy I have for Ms Wilkinson, I’m not a publicist, I’m the DPP.”

The inquiry continues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bruce-lehrmann-attends-first-day-of-public-hearings-at-board-of-inquiry-into-acts-criminal-justice-system/news-story/bc5e5a2823e4dd9ce246699af407c03e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18814655

File: 3f9d59f9d3c8f6a⋯.jpg (126.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australian_Catholic_Bishop….jpg)

>>18800846

Surge in sex abuse cases drives Catholic Church insurer to seek bailout

JOHN FERGUSON - MAY 5, 2023

The Catholic Church’s insurer is considering winding down its ­operations unless another substantial bailout is made by dioceses and religious orders to plug the hole caused by sex abuse cases.

Catholic Church Insurance is discussing closing its new and renewal general insurance business amid a continuing surge in abuse claims as well as the liability ­impacts of factors such as Australia’s erratic weather.

The church hierarchy has been told the capital injection is needed about 18 months after shareholders pumped $170m into CCI to help cover sex abuse claims, amid significant losses.

The church has assured that sex abuse payments will not be ­affected by the insurer’s challenges.

Its shareholders include the ­dioceses across Australia and any decision to wind down its operations would affect hundreds of entities. The church hierarchy has about a fortnight to decide on ­another bailout.

Steps are under way to reassure victims of abuse that any compensation will be covered, with claims under the national redress scheme already met outside CCI’s operating framework.

CCI chairwoman Joan Fitzpatrick acknowledged the organisation was working to decide how to proceed but also confirmed there could be a wind-down phase for the organisation.

CCI was discussing with shareholders the close of new and ­renewal general insurance business in the absence of a significant injection of additional capital.

“Our shareholders have already made a significant contribution to the equity of the organisation in recent times, and we expect to know very soon how we will proceed,” Ms Fitzpatrick said.

“If CCI is unable to raise the ­required capital it will continue to operate for some years while current assets are used to fund operations, settle all known insurance claims, and any new claims that are made against existing policies which remain in force.

“CCI is solvent at this time and able to pay staff, suppliers and claims, and without additional capital is in a position to be right sized in an orderly fashion for the many years it would take to ­resolve all known and as yet unknown claims.’’

The Australian revealed in 2021 that dioceses and religious orders across Australia had moved to shore up CCI, which recorded a $192m loss in 2020-21 and lost nearly $250m the previous financial year. At the time, 18 CCI shareholders had injected capital into the company to strengthen its ability to compensate victims for abuse carried out by priests, religious and lay ­people.

Sex abuse remains the dominant issue for the church insurer but there have also been payouts for climate-related issues affecting customers. It was generally ­assumed that, as the abuse crisis was dealt with, high rates of ­insurance payouts may start to subside.

However, insurance experts said issues such as aggressive pursuit of claims by lawyers had also added to the payout burden.

Hundreds of cases of alleged Catholic abuse were referred to police after the sex abuse royal commission, with the church dominating total case numbers compared with other religions.

Australian Catholic Bishops Conference president Archbishop Timothy Costelloe said the church wanted to assure the Catholic and wider community that it remained committed to continuing to engage with survivors of abuse to meet all its legal obligations.

“The bishops and the leaders of religious institutes have been working for many years to ensure abuse claims are handled fairly, whether cases are covered by insurance policies or not. This will continue to be the case,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/surge-in-sex-abuse-cases-drives-catholic-church-insurer-to-seek-bailout/news-story/8c773fdfe0819970e6e8d509a2c3838d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819307

File: 9ec8fb1cbe9e702⋯.mp4 (15.98 MB,640x360,16:9,Heat_on_ACT_DPP_Shane_Drum….mp4)

>>18708667

Day one: The DPP may be in a world of pain over disclosure

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - MAY 9, 2023

1/3

On day one of the Sofronoff ­inquiry, material before it – and now made public – suggests the ACT Director of Prosecutions may be in a world of pain.

In his incendiary November letter to ACT chief police office Neil Gaughan, DPP Shane Drumgold said he wanted a public inquiry into the police handling of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations against Bruce Lehrmann. He’s got that, and so much more than he surely bargained for.

Drumgold is central to this ­inquiry for reasons that will soon become clearer to all Australians. The most serious issues facing Drumgold, by a country mile, concern disclosure. Did the DPP disclose all material he was duty-bound to disclose to Lehrmann’s defence to ensure there was a fair trial?

Broader questions must later be asked as to whether any possible misbehaviour by Drumgold in this high-profile debacle is ­repeated in other cases that we never hear about. And what does that mean for the legitimacy of the criminal justice system in this country?

Disclosure obligations are critical to our criminal justice system. If a defendant, and ­defence lawyers, are not informed of relevant material, accused people cannot properly and fairly ­defend themselves when confronted by the hefty forces of police and state prosecutorial powers. Given the powers of police and the state, we demand that prosecutors be of the highest quality to ensure that fair trials are guaranteed, not a lottery.

Drumgold’s own statement, released to the public on Monday, provides a mountain of material that raises questions about whether he met his duties to disclose critical information, as the most senior legal prosecutor in the ACT. Remember, Drumgold chose to step into this role, in this case, instead of delegating to one of his staff prosecutors.

On Monday, Drumgold faced the formidable, forensic, careful inquiry team comprising counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC and inquiry chairman Walter ­Sofronoff.

One of the central issues concerned a set of critical missing documents that should have been given to Lehrmann’s lawyers. These were called the Internal Review Documents, known informally as the Moller reports, after DS Scott Moller, the senior police officer who oversaw the investigation into the alleged rape.

What happened, in short, is that once Lehrmann’s lawyer became aware of the existence of the missing Moller reports, the DPP then fought tooth and nail to prevent the reports – prepared by police as part of the investigation into the rape allegation – from being disclosed to the defence.

This part of the story, like so many more to come, is incredible from the start. Lehrmann’s first lawyers at Legal Aid were told about these documents – in a ­disclosure certificate served on them. Schedule 1 of that statement made mention, in vague terms, of material that was not ­legally disclosable. Schedule 3 listed, in ­detail, material that was disclosable to the defence.

The Moller reports, which ­appeared in Schedule 3 as the ­Investigative Review Documents, “outlines version of events as supplied by Ms Higgins during the course of her engagements with police since 2019 against available evidence and subsequent discrepancies. Available upon request and in consultation with DPP.”

A few weeks later, after Lehrmann sacked his Legal Aid lawyers, his new lawyers received a new version of the disclosure statement. This version was very different in one critical respect – the Moller ­reports were no longer listed in the Schedule 3 that lists disclosable material. They were slipped into an ambiguously worded item in Schedule 1, where non-disclosable material is listed as follows: ­“Review of brief materials and subsequent advice/recommendations made by the DPP to ACT Policing.”

According to Steven Whybrow’s statement to the inquiry – he was Lehrmann’s barrister – this critical omission was discovered when Lehrmann’s new solicitor, Kamy Saeedi, compared the first disclosure statement that Legal Aid received, with the one he ­received. But for this, Lehrmann’s defence team may never have known about the existence of the Moller reports.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819313

File: 48976dc9df6d037⋯.jpg (122.39 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_SC_is_quest….jpg)

File: 39684b056a9c6ed⋯.jpg (166.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Detective_Superintendent_S….jpg)

>>18819307

2/3

So, who removed the Moller reports from the disclosable part of the disclosure statement and moved them, in vague words, into the non-disclosable section. In other words, who decided to keep this critical material from the ­defence?

The DPP says in his statement to the inquiry that he “was not involved in all aspects of disclosure in the Lehrmann case.” He says he delegated to junior staff members.

He was by his own evidence involved in what happens to the Moller reports on the second Disclosure Document. Exhibits in the form of an email dated April 27 last year, attached to Drumgold’s own statement to the Inquiry, show that Drumgold told his junior staff that the Moller reports were privileged, and therefore not disclosable to the defence.

A separate file note by the same junior staffer concerning a meeting between prosecutors and junior Australian Federal Police officers to discuss, among other things, whether Moller reports are disclosable to defence, the ODPP staffer records “Conversations with Shane afterwards”: “Don’t want to disclose AFP internal documents – not relevant.”

In a series of further emails from Drumgold to his junior staff, the DPP claims that the Moller reports are not disclosable to the defence. In one he says these documents were created “for the dominant purpose of providing legal advice”.

When Lehrmann’s defence team go to court to fight for access to the Moller reports, the DPP emails junior members of his staff stating that “we need an affidavit” outlining, among other things, that the Moller reports (Drumgold calls them the Investigative Review Document) “formed a ­request for advice from police” thereby making them non-disclosable due to legal privilege. Drumgold’s statement sets out that “he settled affidavits of ODPP employees”.

It’s here that the DPP may find himself in all sorts of trouble. Firstly, legal privilege over these police reports is not the DPPs to claim, but is for the police to claim.

In fact, the DPP would later admit during a court battle when Lehrmann’s lawyers sought ­access to the omitted Moller reports that it was for the AFP to claim privilege. Yet he still fought to stop ­defence getting the documents.

Whybrow must have smelled a rat. Around the time of this court stoush about disclosure, Whybrow rang Moller to ask him whether these documents were created by the AFP for the dominant purpose of seeking legal advice from the DPP. If they were, then privilege would have been attached to them.

The inquiry will hear that, ­according to Whybrow’s statement, and a file note dated September 13 last year that he made of that conversation, Moller said these critical documents were not created for the purpose of getting legal advice and that they should be disclosed to the defence. They agreed that Whybrow would seek them by subpoena. And that is how Lehrmann’s defence lawyers finally received the Moller reports.

Recorded in the same file note, Whybrow says, presciently, to Moller: “I suspect the trial is going to be a bloodbath and that when it’s over it won’t be the end of it and there will undoubtedly be ­inquiries afterwards as to how and why it was able to get this far.”

That was two weeks before the trial started.

After the mistrial, parts of the Moller reports were revealed by The Australian on December 3. Just days later, Drumgold released his explosive letter to police chief Gaughan that demanded an ­inquiry to The Guardian newsite. The release of that information was made in a ­response to an FOI application by The Guardian.

It’s small fish to point out that Drumgold’s own statement concedes he got into trouble by ordering the release of this letter at the time. We can revisit that at another stage. Suffice to say Drumgold made a mess of that FOI request, had to apologise to the AFP and arranged “training”, including for himself.

What matters is that Drumgold tried to keep the Moller ­reports, which runs to more than 60 pages from the defence. It is ­explosive reading, detailing page after page of discrepancies that police discovered when investigating the allegation by Higgins that she was raped in the early hours of March 2019 in the parliamentary office of then-senator Linda ­Reynolds.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819315

File: 075665c4cc87d0f⋯.jpg (63.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_the_….jpg)

File: a9125b08c71a9d6⋯.jpg (188.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_centre_in….jpg)

>>18819313

3/3

This inquiry is not about revisiting the credibility of either ­Higgins or Lehrmann. What matters now – six months after the DPP shocked many with controversial public comments that he would not retry Lehrmann even though he believed he could win at a second trial – is whether the DPP behaved as a minister of justice, making decisions objectively at every stage, exercising his ­duties dispassionately at every stage, to ensure that Lehrmann was given a fair trial last October.

The inquiry, now under way, gives a telling insight into how Drumgold viewed senior AFP ­officers and, by connection, his role as prosecutor.

The DPP makes a series of ­extraordinary claims, page after page, in his statement about ­senior AFP officers, naming them, accusing them of pressuring him not to prosecute, of over-investigating the rape complaint, of ­attempting to assist the defence and undermine the prosecution. How AFP senior officers and the DPP work together in the future is a live issue.

To give a sense, here are a few examples. Drumgold says he had “never” had officers of such senior rank as DS Scott Moller and DI Marcus Boorman be involved in briefings to the AFP. Drumgold says he felt pressure to agree with police concerns about the case.

There is another way to view their involvement: given even the then-prime minister involved himself in this rape allegation, its possible very senior police thought it only appropriate that they wear any heat from a national scandal, rather than more ­junior officers.

When Drumgold received parts of the Moller reports in June 2021, he said he had “never” before received a brief like this one, where police focused on discrepancies and weaknesses in a prosecution case. Specifically, when Drumgold read part of the Moller reports that described Higgins as “evasive, unco-operative and manipulative” Drumgold said he had “never seen comments of this nature of a police brief”.

There is another view: any sensible prosecutor should want to know all the weaknesses in a prosecution case before going to trial. Seen in that light, the DPP could have viewed the discrepancy analysis in the Moller reports as helpful to his role to determine the truth. After all, the last thing a prosecutor wants is to be blind­sided at trial.

After Drumgold learnt from Whybrow that Moller told Whybrow that the Moller reports “were definitely not produced for legal advice and that it should be produced [to defence]” Drumgold said he “formed the view that DS Moller actively wanted to disclose to the defence his case commentary including his perceived weakness in the case. This appeared to be a further example of what I perceived to be as ongoing assistance to the defence by police.”

There is a different view: he should have agreed to disclose the Moller reports to the defence rather than defence lawyers having to battle so hard to get these documents that analyse and investigate possible discrepancies.

The upshot of the DPP’s statement is that throughout this tawdry saga, the DPP appeared to view police conduct through a prism of them pressuring him and undermining his prosecution. Instead, he could have viewed police conduct as part of a search for truth and providing the warning signs that he should have a prosecutor.

While the relationship between the DPP and the AFP is ­fascinating and important, what will be more critical to this inquiry is whether the DPP used his position as the most senior law officer to keep material from the defence. There is a lot more to come on that fundamental duty.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/day-one-the-dpp-may-be-in-a-world-of-pain-over-disclosure/news-story/b9c210675969b366d97c7e7d54bc636f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819337

File: 9219848b1ae08b3⋯.jpg (119.46 KB,1280x720,16:9,An_upset_Brittany_Higgins_….jpg)

>>18708667

Bombshell police dossier of Higgins’ ‘inconsistencies’ raises stakes

STEPHEN RICE and JANET ALBRECHTSEN

1/3

Shane Drumgold has sensationally claimed investigating police tried to sabotage the rape case against Bruce Lehrmann by heightening Brittany Higgins’ emotional distress in the hope she would be too traumatised to appear as a witness.

The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions’ extraordinary attack on the Australian Federal Police officers was made in an 81-page statement to the Sofronoff inquiry, which has made public an explosive police dossier outlining inconsistencies in Brittany Higgins’ statements about her alleged rape. The police briefs, known as the Moller Reports, have been at the heart of the dispute between the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions and the Australian Federal Police. Among the claims in the documents were:

• Ms Higgins said she was “10/10 drunk” but Parliament House CCTV footage showed her interacting with security staff, smiling and laughing, with no signs of being unwell.

• Ms Higgins declined to provide her phone on numerous occasions despite being aware of its importance to the ­investigation.

• Police discovered texts on Ms Higgins’ phone that said “I’m clearing out my phone ahead of police” and “F..k it, if they (AFP) want to play hardball, I’ll cry on The Project again because of this sort of treatment”.

• There were doubts about the provenance of the photos Ms Higgins said she took of a bruise to her leg from an alleged assault.

• A witness claimed Ms Higgins and former boyfriend Ben Dillaway had sex on multiple occasions in the same office in which she alleged she was assaulted.

The police documents also list troubling issues with Mr Lehrmann’s versions, including:

• The version of events did not seem plausible and the suggestion two people entered an office at that time of evening and had no further interaction seemed unlikely.

• He denied having drinks in the office. Notes of Fiona Brown taken at the time showed he conceded he was drinking whiskey and had two glasses while chatting with Ms Higgins.

It was the many allegations of discrepancies in Ms Higgins’ claims that led Mr Drumgold to question whether the AFP had decided early in the investigation not to charge Mr Lehrmann.

In his statement, Mr Drumgold was highly critical of AFP officers over their focus on discrepancies in Ms Higgins’ rape allegations and their concern about her mental health, despite his decision to abandon a retrial over concerns for her health.

He told one colleague the officers were guilty of either “unsophisticated corruption” or “atomic-level stupidity”.

Early in the investigation, Ms Higgins asked ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates to act as a conduit for her in dealing with police. When the AFP conducted a formal interview with Ms Yates, as a “disclosure witness”, Mr Drumgold viewed it as an attempt to stop her shielding Ms Higgins from police. “This heightened my fear that this was an attempt to prevent Ms Yates from insulating Ms Higgins from direct contact with police, in order to increase the emotional distress of Ms Higgins, in the hope that she would not be able to proceed as a witness,” Mr Drumgold said in his statement.

The relationship between the two agencies deteriorated rapidly when police began their investigation of Ms Higgins’ claims.

Mr Drumgold said his fears grew at his first police briefing, which was held with Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman. “Rather than a summary of the relevant evidence … this briefing seemed to be an attempt to demonstrate that the evidence was weak. The presenting officers ­focused heavily on Ms Higgins’ credibility. I recall they described her as ‘evasive’,” he said. “DI Boorman expressed frustration that Ms Higgins had not provided to the investigators her mobile phone when they first asked for access to it, suggesting that if Ms Higgins was honest about the offence, she would have handed over the phone to them.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819341

File: cbe7d36a7e2cbd4⋯.jpg (78.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Liberal_Staffer_Who_Wa….jpg)

>>18819337

2/3

‘Discrepancies’ from the Moller Reports identified by investigators in statements by Brittany Higgins

INTOXICATION

• Brittany Higgins said Bruce Lehrmann ‘bought her drinks all night’ but CCTV footage did not reflect this, and Lehrmann’s financial records show he spent $16 at The Dock and $40 at 88MPH.

• Higgins said she was ‘10/10 drunk’ but Parliament House CCTV footage showed her interacting with security staff, smiling and laughing, with no signs of being unwell.

• Higgins said she ‘couldn’t walk’ but CCTV footage showed her walking without issue in heels.

• Higgins said she was ‘super-inebriated’ but security staff described her as ‘slightly intoxicated’.

• Higgins said she couldn’t write her name and that Lehrmann signed her in, but a security guard described her as willingly signing her own name. On being shown the sign-in sheet she said: “That’s not my handwriting”.

88MPH BAR

• Higgins told police on 8 April in 2019, two weeks after the alleged rape, that she could not recall the name of the nightclub she went to with Lehrmann, yet days earlier she had told a work colleague it was 88MPH.

• Higgins told The Project she had no romantic actions with Lehrmann at 88MPH but her friend Lauren Gain said they had hands on each other’s legs and were ‘pashing’; she was also observed to be taking selfies of Lehrmann and herself on her phone. She informed police she had photos on her phone of the evening and that she would keep them for police, but never provided them. Note: Lehrmann also denied ‘pashing’ Higgins but ‘concedes that they were close’.

THE SCENE

• Higgins stated that she had her dress up around her waist and the straps were off her shoulders when she woke up during the alleged assault but the female security guard who checked on her that morning in Liberal senator Linda Reynolds’ office states that she was fully naked with the dress on the ground next to her shoes.

• Higgins stated that her head was facing the door to the minister’s office during the incident and when she woke up but the same security guard said Higgins’ head was facing the window with her feet facing the door.

• Higgins stated that she was crying during the incident, but the security guard told police she looked at Higgins during the welfare check and observed a full face of makeup and no signs of crying or distress.

• Higgins states that she ate chocolates and vomited in the bathroom but the cleaner stated he did not have to do anything more than a light clean, saw no stains on the couch and did not observe anything to suggest the bathroom had been used (towels were still in place etc).

HIGGINS’ PHONE

• Higgins decline to provide her phone on numerous occasions despite being made aware of its importance to the investigation.

• Police discovered texts on Higgins’ phone that said ‘I’m clearing out my phone ahead of police’ and ‘F.ck it, if they (AFP) want to play hardball, I’ll cry on The Project again because of this sort of treatment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819345

File: 3c1fbc75d2f569a⋯.jpg (106.26 KB,1200x630,40:21,As_rape_allegations_rock_A….jpg)

>>18819341

3/3

INJURY TO LEG

• The first disclosure of any injury by Higgins was to The Project in February 2021; ‘no prior mentions’.

• Following examination of Higgins’ phone (not the original phone), the metadata indicates this image of a bruise was taken on April 3, 2019 (11 days after the alleged incident).

• Regarding the digital image of an injury to her right leg that was provided to media outlets, Higgins stated this injury occurred during the assault. This injury appeared to be on the upper right outside thigh. Based on this disclosure, this leg would have been closest to the back of the couch.

• Higgins and a witness both stated that she fell up the steps of 88MPH bar – ‘Potentially her injury as documented in the digital image provided to the media supports this’.

• A physical examination of the couch did not identify any hard surfaces or objects.

A document marked Review Docs records ‘discrepancies’ in relation to Ms Higgins’ conversations with her former boyfriend Ben Dillaway, noting:

• Still no direct disclosure of sexual assault. No disclosure of assault had been made until after Ben asks her if she was taken advantage of – Higgins said was not lucid, didn’t think it was consensual.

• Brittany omitted these conversations when discussing with police.

• Brittany states they were in a relationship.

• Nicole Haymer (a former colleague of Lehrmann) advised Dillaway was engaged while having sex with Higgins in the office.

• Dillaway ended his engagement after his relationship with Higgins.

• Haymer is also recorded telling police that Dillaway sent Higgins flowers every couple of days, with a message stating ‘Love Ben’.

• It appears alleged rape [?] incident occurred while still ‘seeing’ Ben.

In an 18-page document called Briefing for CPO – 6 May 2021, further material appears under ‘Other Factors’:

• Haymer indicates that Higgins and Dillaway have had sex on multiple occasions in the same office to which she is stating she was sexually assaulted.

• Higgins and Dillaway were having an affair as Dillaway was engaged at the time.

• Lehrmann did have whiskey in his desk.

• Higgins had been counselled for lying before.

• The police briefs also list issues identified with Lehrmann’s statements, including that his version of events ‘did not seem plausible’.

• ‘The suggestions that two people enter an office at that time of the evening and have no further interaction seems unlikely’, the brief noted.

• Lehrmann denied having drinks in the office but in the notes of Reynolds’ chief of staff Fiona Brown, he conceded that he was drinking whiskey and had two glasses while chatting.

* Documents have been edited

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bombshell-police-dossier-raises-stakes/news-story/7a8049f1584996585a8cf152d5a41651

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819377

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18708667

DPP Shane Drumgold worried police opinions would ‘crush’ Brittany Higgins

KRISTIN SHORTEN - MAY 9, 2023

1/2

ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold did not want a document containing a senior police ­officer’s “gratuitous stereotyping” of Brittany Higgins’ credibility to fall into the hands of Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyers because of the “crushing” impact it would have on her.

In a dramatic second day of testimony to the Sofronoff inquiry, the Director of Public Prosecutions conceded he may have “unintentionally” misled the ACT Supreme Court over an affidavit seeking to prevent the so-called Moller Report being given to Mr Lehrmann’s defence team.

he report contained details about Ms Higgins’ allegations she had been raped by Mr Lehrmann, including discrepancies in her statements to investigators.

But Mr Drumgold claimed his fears about the document’s impact on Ms Higgins were not the reason he told a court it was covered by legal professional privilege and not disclosed to the defence.

“Because essentially, it says a senior police officer – through a stereotype bias analysis – has drawn particular conclusions about a complainant. I mean it’s potentially terribly harmful to a complainant,” he said.

“I had some concerns that this would be crushing to the complainant.”

Mr Drumgold said he believed an Australian Federal Police investigative review document – the Moller Report – was subject to a claim of legal professional privilege because it was created for the dominant purpose of receiving legal advice from him.

But Mr Drumgold acknowledged he had claimed the reports were privileged without having seen them and without checking with detective superintendent Scott Moller, who wrote them.

Mr Drumgold appeared in court to oppose a defence application to disclose the Moller ­Report, relying on an affidavit sworn by a junior lawyer in his ­office, Mitchell Greig, that the document had been included on a disclosure certificate in error because it should have been the subject of legal professional privilege. But Mr Greig did not state the source of the information in his affidavit.

Counsel assisting, Erin Longbottom KC, asked Mr Drumgold: “Could it be that there was no source for that information – you simply told Mr Greig to include it in his affidavit?”

Mr Drumgold: “Look, I mean, I’m ultimately responsible for this but I think you might be overstating my input into the preparation of documents, but I accept that I would be ultimately responsible for it.”

Inquiry chief Walter Sofronoff KC observed: “It’s pretty plain that but for that instruction, Mr Greig didn’t have a clue whether the documents were privileged or not privileged and it’s plain then that when he says ‘I’m informed’, he’s simply following the instruction. Because it looks like he was informed by police.”

Ms Longbottom said Mr Drumgold must accept that the affidavit had the capacity to mislead the court.

“It is suggesting that there is an ACT police source of information about a series of facts that led to these documents being included (for nondisclosure) where there just was no source for that information – it was just you. And a statement like that is misleading to the court.

Mr Drumgold: “Well, I don’t know – unintentionally. I mean, we do aim to have no errors at all ever – sometimes we may fall short.”

Mr Drumgold also said it “never occurred” to him to tell Ms Higgins that he had read her confidential counselling notes, or to ­recuse himself from prosecuting the case after reading them.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819380

File: b244f94d24c8b50⋯.jpg (143.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_SC_speaking….jpg)

File: 4f36a5b4f282e23⋯.jpg (65.44 KB,1024x768,4:3,Walter_Sofronoff_speaking_….jpg)

File: 50cfa9977339070⋯.jpg (82.88 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Former_political_staffer_B….jpg)

>>18819377

2/2

At Mr Lehrmann’s first court mention in September 2021 his lawyer at the time, Warwick Korn, informed Mr Drumgold he had ­already been served a brief of evidence.

Mr Drumgold’s statement, tendered to the inquiry, said he was “shocked” that police had provided the brief directly to the ­defence, circumventing the normal “checks and balances”.

The DPP then made frantic enquiries to ascertain whether police had provided potentially protected evidence to Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers.

He said that although the disclosure to the defence was probably inadvertent he “needed to establish that it might be relevant to the credibility of one of the police involved, for example”.

“I already knew that one or more police had taken a particular preliminary view on the brief and I now knew that consequent to that some protected material had been served. Now I’m asking myself are those two things connected?”

Mr Drumgold said he was suspicious because Ms Higgins “had raised concerns that information was deliberately being disseminated by police and that goes back to her reservation in handing over her phone.”

Asked whether he thought that was objectively a realistic concern, Mr Drumgold replied: “It was a possibility.”

Mr Drumgold’s office identified that Ms Higgins’ sensitive counselling records — that ought not to be produced to anybody without a judge’s order — had been disclosed to the defence.

The inquiry heard that counselling communications are considered a “protected confidence” and are subject to “very tight” statutory protections and can no longer be disclosed for the purpose of criminal proceedings.

Mr Drumgold said that while he was worried about the defence reading her protected counselling communications, he never considered it a statutory breach that he had read them.

Mr Sofronoff told Mr Drumgold: “It seems to me, potentially, the statute is being ignored by police in getting them and by you perhaps in receiving them. It didn’t occur to you that this was a breach of the statute?”

Mr Drumgold: “I was not looking at it through that prism.”

Mr Sofronoff: “At any time, from the beginning to the end of the trial, did it occur to you that the documents had been wrongly disclosed to you?”

Mr Drumgold: “Probably not, no.”

Mr Sofronoff: “Well it didn’t, did it?”

Mr Drumgold: “No, well I don’t know what my state of mind was, sitting here today. That didn’t go through my thought processes.”

Ms Longbottom: “Am I right to understand that, being put on notice by a junior solicitor in your office that these are protected confidences, you decided the best course was to read them?”

Mr Drumgold: “At the time, I was trying to work out the ­immediate damage.”

Mr Drumgold said once the documents had been disclosed he had to look at them in order to work out how much harm had been done and what remedy was required.

Mr Sofronoff pointed out that if Mr Drumgold, as prosecutor, had become aware that one of his witnesses had said something in evidence that was materially inconsistent with something in the document, he would be obliged to hand that document to the defence – but would be unable to do so because of the statutory provision.

“You would sit as the one person in the courtroom aware of the inconsistency?”

Mr Drumgold: “Potentially, yes.”

“How would you handle that problem?”

“I don’t know. I don’t know.”

Mr Sofronoff: “One thing you could have done is disqualified yourself from running the case and let another prosecutor who hadn’t read the document.”

“Yes I could have done that.”

Mr Drumgold said that once the counselling records were improperly disclosed to the defence, he had to read them to “work out what the remedy was required”.

The inquiry continues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/dpp-shane-drumgold-worried-police-opinions-would-crush-brittany-higgins/news-story/0522007fe84c68b6e159701e560a2608

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMv7NVln-PY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819394

File: 58e60550ec96a61⋯.jpg (84.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_s_lawyer_St….jpg)

>>18708667

Sofronoff inquiry: Shane Drumgold accused of withholding crucial documents

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - MAY 9, 2023

1/4

In a damning submission to the Sofronoff inquiry, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer has accused chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold of withholding crucial police documents that exposed discrepancies in Brittany Higgins’s rape claims and of alleging political interference and cover-up by Liberal ministers when there was no evidence of it.

Among the explosive claims made by barrister Steven Whybrow:

• That during a break in the trial Mr Drumgold, the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions, called investigating police “boofheads”

• That a senior police officer investigating the case was so distressed about the prosecution that he said he would resign if Mr Lehrmann was found guilty;

• That Mr Whybrow was never told a key witness had complained to the DPP about “a serious misrepresentation” by Ms Higgins on the witness stand and had sought to have it corrected, a failure that “undermined the integrity and fairness of the trial”;

• That Ms Higgins had been allowed to make allegations about former Liberal ministers Linda Reynolds and Michaelia Cash that were demonstrably fabrications, and that evidence from the witness would have contradicted her claims;

• That the evidence of Senator Reynolds and Ms Cash was “strategically deployed for the purposes of making submissions about political interference and cover up where there was in fact no objective evidence supportive of this notion”;

• That Mr Whybrow was “somewhat cynical” about Mr Drumgold’s announcement that there would be no re-trial given that Mr Lehrmann had just filed a particular application with the court, the details of which are still suppressed;

• That when Mr Drumgold’s decision not to re-try was leaked to the media and an angry Whybrow asked if the source was Ms Higgins’ boyfriend, David Shiraz, Mr Drumgold replied “It must be!”

• That during the trial, Mr Whybrow received an anonymous threatening email that he found so disturbing he asked police to help track down the author.

Mr Drumgold is currently giving evidence at the inquiry, headed by Walter Sofronoff KC, with Mr Whybrow likely to follow later in the week.

On Monday Mr Drumgold was ­accused of making false statements to trial judge Chief Justice Lucy McCallum in a hearing last year over Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech.

The DPP is facing intense scrutiny over whether he properly disclosed ­relevant material to the court and the defence.

Mr Whybrow’s 75-page statement to the inquiry claims that Drumgold withheld a key police document from the defence that detailed “many inconsistencies in (Brittany Higgins’) evidence” and should have been disclosed.

In his statement, Mr Whybrow records that he was present when the legal team realised there was a crucial missing document. “I always regarded this material as being both relevant and disclosable.”

The Inquiry has already heard how the disclosure certificate had been altered to delete the crucial police ‘Investigative Review’, described as “versions of events as supplied by Ms Higgins … against the available evidence and subsequent discrepancies”.

The team immediately filed a claim to access the document but were stonewalled by the DPP at every turn, according to Mr Whybrow.

In his statement to the Inquiry, the barrister recounts an exhaustive legal battle to obtain the document despite the police agreeing it should be disclosed.

At a hearing on 8 September 2022 Mr Drumgold told the court the document had been listed on the disclosure certificate “in error” and that was why it was removed.

“It is the AFP’s legal professional privilege and it is not an issue for us,” he said.

Frustrated, Mr Whybrow rang the ACT Police Manager of Criminal Investigations, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller.

“I decided to try and speak with DS Moller directly given we had been asking for this document since June and I was becoming increasingly frustrated and was not satisfied with the explanations being provided about why it disappeared from the Disclosure Certificate and was not being disclosed,” Mr Whybrow says.

“I gained the clear impression DS Moller was of the view this was important material that should be disclosed to the defence and the roadblock to its production was not the Police but the DPP and/or (Office of the) DPP.”

“I am aware that the AFP made no claim, at any time, of legal professional privilege over the Investigative Review Document”, Mr Whybrow says in his statement to the inquiry.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819396

File: 7179124ae152f1a⋯.jpg (85.19 KB,768x1024,3:4,DPP_Shane_Drumgold_leaving….jpg)

>>18819394

2/4

Mr Whybrow says he found DS Moller to be “transparent, objective and entirely appropriate in his conduct” and that he had no issues with the professionalism of police involved in the case.

By contrast, Mr Whybrow had long been worried about the direction the DPP was taking the case, including his actions following TV presenter Lisa Wilkinson’s “inflammatory and prejudicial” Logies speech in June, just before the trial was supposed to have begun, as well as various public statements by Ms Higgins.

“I am concerned that Mr Drumgold SC did not act as an objective ‘minister for justice’”, he writes in his statement. “In my opinion the DPP failed to take adequate steps to either mitigate the adverse publicity or counsel Ms Higgins (or her supporters) to cease making public statements about the matter.

In a file note of a conversation with Scott Moller three weeks before the trial began Mr Whybrow told the policeman: “I suspect the trial is going to be a bloodbath and that when it’s over it won’t be the end of it and there will undoubtedly be inquiries afterwards as to how and why it was able to get this far.”

Mr Whybrow says he told DS Moller the evidence suggested Brittany Higgins “has told a multitude of lies”.

“Going through the brief was a bit like panning for gold in Ballarat in the 1800’s from the defence perspective – every time you dip the pan in the river you find gold nuggets,” he told the policeman.

“It would not be a good look for the AFP if it was later revealed that an important document setting out the many inconsistencies in BH evidence had been withheld from the defence and it hadn’t been privileged,” he told DS Moller.

DS Moller agreed, Mr Whybrow says, “and confirmed that in his view the review document was one the defence should have and it wasn’t prepared by him to get legal advice on. It was a summary of the various issues he had identified with the versions given by BH. He did not say this explicitly but it was clear to me that he held my own concerns about the veracity of her allegations.”

Mr Drumgold’s conduct during the trial confirmed his suspicions.

Mr Whybrow alleges that evidence from former Ministers Linda Reynolds and Michaelia Cash was “strategically deployed for the purposes of making submissions about political interference and cover up, where there was in fact no objective evidence supportive of this notion.”

Ms Higgins had been allowed to give evidence that Ms Cash knew of the allegations of sexual assault and that Senator Reynolds had sent her away to WA during the election campaign to isolate her for political purposes “objective material available to the defence suggested this was all a fabrication.”

Mr Whybrow was not permitted to cross-examine Ms Higgins on her claims, and Mr Drumgold had both politicians declared hostile witnesses.

That was “grossly unfair” to the defence, he said.

“There was, to my knowledge, nothing to indicate that Ms Cash and Ms Reynolds were anything other than honest and truthful witnesses who gave evidence consistent with prior statements they had given.”

Mr Drumgold’s treatment of the police raised further alarm for Whybrow.

During a break in the trial when Drumgold and Whybrow discussed what evidence might be led from two of the investigators, Marcus Boorman and DS Moller, Mr Drumgold said: ‘Any opinion by those boofheads about the strength of this case is not admissible.”

Mr Drumgold denigrated the police in court during the trial, remarking that the quality of the police interview with Ms Higgins “is determined by the skillsets of those police officers asking the questions … which in this case was not high.”

“I regarded the comment as pejorative, unjustified and inappropriate, particularly as it was made in front of the jury,” Mr Whybrow says. “It was my assessment that the second (police) Interview with Ms Higgins undermined (to a significant degree) the credibility of Ms Higgins and necessarily therefore the prosecution case. This comment, in front of the jury, could only tend to undermine the weight the jury might give to this evidence.”

On 19 October, the day the jury retired to consider its verdict, Mr Whybrow received a call from The Australian asking him about the Investigative Review document. Mr Whybrow declined to comment but alerted Detective Inspector Boorman, the investigation manager assigned to the case.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819398

File: 5671821d4ea1984⋯.jpg (75.87 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_the_….jpg)

File: 7e921046de061e7⋯.jpg (72.69 KB,1024x768,4:3,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

>>18819396

3/4

Six days later, on Tuesday 25 October, with the jury still out, DS Boorman sent him a message asking if he could have a chat over a coffee.

“Anywhere but Two Before Ten,” DS Boorman responds, referring to a café just across the road from the DPP’s office. They met instead at midday in a coffee shop further away, in Farrell Place.

“When I saw him, he appeared to me to be anxious and agitated and concerned we not be seen speaking together in direct line of sight of the Office of the DPP,” Mr Whybrow says.

“DI Boorman indicated to me that he was quite distressed about this prosecution and considered that Mr Lehrmann was innocent. He made several other comments along these lines and I recall he said words to the effect “if the jury comes back with a guilty verdict, I’m resigning.””

“I had never before had a conversation with a Police officer who had indicated that they were going to resign because they had been ordered to prosecute someone they considered was innocent,” Whybrow says.

The policeman didn’t have to go through with his threat to quit - two days later the trial was aborted due to juror misconduct.

A furious Chief Justice McCallum expressly warned there should be no further public comment pending the retrial set down for February.

Ms Higgins walked out of the court and made a prepared speech to the media, falsely claiming, among other things, that Mr Lehrmann’s phone, unlike her own, had not been seized or examined by police.

Those “egregious comments” required the DPP to take immediate and proactive steps to correct the public record and take steps to stop Ms Higgins making any such statements going forward. But that did not happen.

It was only after the trial had been abandoned that Mr Whybrow became aware of other critical developments that had occurred behind the scenes.

He learnt a key witness in the trial, Linda Reynolds’ chief of staff, Fiona Brown had emailed the ODPP about “a serious misrepresentation” by Brittany Higgins in the trial and sought it be corrected.

The Australian has previously revealed how Brown accused Drumgold of threatening and intimidating her after she left the witness box on a morning tea break, and of ignoring her pleas to be recalled to the stand to refute “blatantly false and misleading” evidence by Brittany Higgins.

But Mr Whybrow says the ODPP never told him of Ms Brown’s complaint. He only found out when Ms Brown contacted him six weeks later because “she did not know who else to turn to.”

“Although I did not know it at the time, it appears that the ODPP ignored the Brown email despite it clearly raising serious issues going to the credibility of Ms Higgins, which was the key issue in the trial. I contend that the Brown email ought to have been disclosed to the defence and the failure to do so undermined the integrity and fairness of the trial,” Mr Whybrow says.

Mr Whybrow was also unaware that Ms Higgins’ evidence at the trial was being video recorded. He only discovered it when the jury was several days into its deliberation and he asked the Chief Justice’s associate to confirm the testimony had not been recorded. The associate informed him it had been.

After the mistrial, media reports suggested that because Ms Higgins’ evidence had been recorded she might not need to attend court for the retrial.

When Mr Lehrmann’s solicitor wrote to Mr Drumgold asking who had authorised the recording, on what basis it had been recorded or might be used in a retrial, Mr Drumgold wrote back: “I am at a complete loss as to why these questions are being directed towards myself or my office”; and sarcastically suggested: “if you have any enquiries about legislative provisions, that you seek advice from counsel.”

Mr Whybrow also never knew that Mr Drumgold had written to ACT police chief Neil Gaughan on 1 November 2022, just days after the mistrial was declared, demanding police on the case have no further contact with the defence.

Mr Whybrow only learnt about the letter when it was published by The Guardian in December “and presumably would have remained unknown to the defence if a second trial had taken place.”

Mr Whybrow said he was “concerned about the circumstances by which The Guardian received and published the letter and the fact that, when released, pursuant to an apparent Freedom of Information request, the name of every person referred to in the letter, including Mr Drumgold SC’s junior counsel, was redacted except for mine.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819401

File: 2ba5910ca73a3a2⋯.jpg (164.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_Heidi….jpg)

>>18819398

4/4

Mr Whybrow also expressed concerns that it was “wholly inappropriate” for Mr Drumgold in his press release after the mistrial in which he “expressed an opinion regarding the prospects of a conviction of Mr Lehrmann.”

“That expression of opinion only served to further demonise Mr Lehrmann, in the eyes of some members of the community, in circumstances where he would now be denied the possibility of being acquitted.”

Mr Whybrow thought there should never have been an order for a retrial.

“Furthermore, I was of the view it would be inappropriate for Mr Drumgold SC to make any decision going forward as to the continuation of the prosecution having regard to the concerns I have already raised in this statement as to his conduct up to and including discharge of the jury.”

On 1 December 2022 Mr Whybrow received an email from Mr Drumgold asking him to attend a meeting in the chambers of the Chief Justice, where the DPP announced that he had “recently received medical reports from two psychologists/psychiatrists”.

Mr Whybrow notes he was not given access to the reports.

Mr Drumgold then said: “I plan to make a public announcement tomorrow morning.”

Whybrow asked: “Can you let me know what you are going to say?”

However, Chief Justice McCallum expressed the view that “what the Director might say was really not my concern and I replied that I disagreed with her Honour.”

Mr Drumgold said he wanted the news to be completely embargoed until he announced it the following day.

Mr Whybrow says he recalls “being somewhat cynical about the timing of the proposed announcement” given that, at that time, Mr Lehrmann had filed a particular application to the court, the nature of which remains suppressed.

The Australian has previously revealed that in a draft submission prepared for that application by Sydney barrister Arthur Moses SC, Mr Drumgold was alleged to have been “complicit” in a bid by Ms Higgins to prejudice the case against Mr Lehrmann.

The draft submission, dated December 1, was to have been filed the following day but did not proceed given the DPP’s shock decision that he was dropping charges against Mr Lehrmann.

The Australian has been told that Mr Drumgold would have been aware of the central claims against him in the days leading up to his decision not to retry Mr Lehrmann.

That evening, Mr Whybrow was out to an early dinner and at about 8pm was alerted to a story on news.com.au by Samantha Maiden “which revealed the exact matters Mr Drumgold SC had requested not be disclosed due to concerns over Ms Higgins’ safety”.

Mr Whybrow says he was furious. He immediately texted Mr Drumgold, asking whether the source was Ms Higgins’ boyfriend, David Sharaz.

Mr Drumgold replied “It must be! It could not have come from anyone else.”

Mr Whybrow told Mr Drumgold in the same text exchange: “I think he is the person who threatened me but I’m not making that accusation,” to which Mr Drumgold replies: “I truly do not know what to say.”

Mr Whybrow concludes that he is concerned that Mr Drumgold breached his obligation to only commence and continue a prosecution where there are reasonable grounds for obtaining a conviction; his duty of impartiality; his duty of disclosure; his duty to mitigate adverse publicity; and his duty to ensure a fair trial.

Mr Whybrow says he found other staff at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to be responsive and they conducted themselves appropriately.

However, Mr Whybrow was critical of the role played by ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates.

“Her high profile appearances alongside Ms Higgins whilst entering and leaving Court, and also within the court, by virtue of her statutory office, had, in my view, a real capacity to undermine the presumption of innocence by blurring the clear distinction between a complainant and someone who was already to be considered a victim of crime,” Mr Whybrow said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sofronoff-inquiry-shane-drumgold-accused-of-withholding-crucial-documents/news-story/634bef922771911e974c4c58acd667b3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819428

File: e29d413ccf0fb60⋯.jpg (68.94 KB,1280x720,16:9,Elizabeth_Bennett_SC.jpg)

File: 1978e50d51070ad⋯.jpg (70.6 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Victorian_Bar_president_Sa….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18794875

Bar councillors vote on voice ‘conflict of interest’

ELLIE DUDLEY - MAY 9, 2023

The Victorian Bar Council will tonight vote on whether three councillors who signed a motion urging the Bar issue its public support for the Indigenous voice should remove themselves from any discussion on the referendum moving forward.

The Australian revealed on Monday Victorian Bar Council vice-president Elizabeth Bennett SC, councillor Colin Mandy SC and councillor Fiona Livingston-Clark put their names to a motion proposing the Bar back Anthony Albanese’s proposed voice model, as the NSW Bar Association have done.

The motion called for a special general meeting of all 2200 state Bar members, at which they would vote on a proposal that stated: “The Victorian Bar considered that the amendment proposed by the Bill for an Act to alter the Constitution is sound, appropriate and compatible with Australia’s system of representative and ­responsible government which would be enhanced by addition of the voice.”

However, some Bar members believe that by attaching their names to the motion, the three councillors have compromised their independence.

Tonight, at a pre-scheduled Victorian Bar meeting, The Australian understands councillors will vote on whether Ms Bennett, Mr Mandy and Ms Livingston should declare a conflict of interest and refrain from taking any part in voice-related discussion.

Victorian Bar Council vice-president Elizabeth Bennett SC urged to resign

Ms Bennett SC is ­facing mounting pressure to ­resign, following the revelations she signed the motion.

Senior Bar members told The Australian that by attaching her name to the motion, Ms Bennett had “undermined her independence” as Bar Council vice-president, and should therefore resign immediately.

“It’s deeply concerning that somebody who has adopted a certain ideological position remains as vice-president of the Bar,” said one member, who asked to ­remain anonymous.

“People like Elizabeth Bennett have a view of supporting equality and diversity, but only if it is people who agree with them. This is not the Bar I joined. She should step down.”

As vice-president of the Bar Council, Ms Bennett automatically holds a position on the silk selection committee, referring applicants to the Chief Justice to become senior counsel.

Some Bar members said her decision to publicly back the voice could inhibit anyone applying for silk from giving their view on the issue, fearing that it may clash with hers.

“It’s extremely concerning for anybody applying for silk, and would have a chilling effect on applicants expressing their view, if that doesn’t reinforce her view,” the same member said. “It shows a lack of understanding or respect for the Bar Council process.”

Another Bar member, who also said Ms Bennett should ­resign, added: “By attaching her name to a petition essentially advocating a yes vote, she has lost any sense of impartiality.”

But Ms Bennett told The Australian she respected “the right of all members of the Victorian Bar to take a position on the voice”.

“It is not inconsistent with my role as vice-president to take a personal position on an issue, and there is no conflict of interest in doing so,” she said.

The motion was lodged to the Victorian Bar Council on Friday afternoon. At a similar time, a ­motion from the Bar’s conservative camp was lodged, calling for the association to remain silent on the issue. Bar Council president Sam Hay KC now has the unenviable position of navigating the two motions.

The 21 Bar councillors were expected to hold a final vote on the issue on Tuesday night. But this is now highly unlikely considering the two motions for special general meetings to be held.

Instead, it seems likely Mr Hay will conduct one electronic poll of all members, asking them if they would like the institution to issue its public support for the voice, or remain silent.

While the NSW Bar Association has been vocal in its support for the voice, the Queensland Bar Council last week announced it would not issue a unified position.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victorian-bar-vice-president-called-to-resign-over-voice-stance/news-story/de6d732159992935089a23eb938ae507

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819440

File: c9aea1734175168⋯.jpg (79.45 KB,1280x720,16:9,Law_Institute_of_Victoria_….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18794875

Victorian Law Institute vows to back the Indigenous voice to parliament

ELLIE DUDLEY - MAY 9, 2023

The Law Institute of Victoria has vowed to back the Indigenous voice despite conceding some of its members may hold an opposing view.

Its support comes as infighting persists at the Victorian Bar Association over the issue, and all 2200 members gear up to vote on whether the association should release a unified position.

The Law Institute of Victoria, which represents 18,000 lawyers across the state, released a media statement on Tuesday declaring its “public support to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice in the Constitution”.

“We believe that establishing a constitutionally enshrined Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice is a long-overdue constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Nations peoples,” Institute President Tania Wolff said.

“It will be both a substantive and practical measure to better inform policy and legal decisions that impact the lives of Indigenous Australians. The consequences of the constitutional change have been interrogated by constitutional experts and have been found to be sound.”

However, she acknowledged the Institute was “cognisant of the diversity of views across out community and the Law Institute of Victoria membership.”

“Ultimately, each Australian will need to arrive at their own decision on this issue,” she said.

The statement followed in the footsteps of the Law Council of Australia, which stated its support earlier this year.

Meanwhile the state’s Bar Association continues to tie itself in knots over the issue and is yet to reach a decision on whether it releases a public statement supporting the voice, or remains silent.

The Australian on Monday revealed all 2200 members of the state Bar will likely participate in an electronic vote on the issue, after two separate motions for special general meetings were tendered to the Victorian Bar Council for consideration.

The Victorian Bar Council will on Tuesday night vote on whether three councillors who signed one of the motions - which urged the Bar to issue its public support for the voice - should remove themselves from any discussion on the referendum moving forward.

The NSW Bar Association has stated its public support for the voice, while the Queensland Bar Association has declared it will not issue a public position.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/vic-law-institute-vows-to-back-the-voice/news-story/52fccc05a82a530e585a882615d23cfa

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819462

File: f363c1cba567906⋯.jpg (4.91 MB,7115x4743,7115:4743,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>18670474

Canada seeks to join non-nuclear pillar of AUKUS alliance

ROBERT FIFE and STEVEN CHASE - 8 May 2023

1/2

The Canadian government is seeking to join the non-nuclear component of AUKUS, a security pact between Australia, Britain and the United States that was struck to counter China’s rising military might in the Indo-Pacific region, according to two government sources.

Canada was conspicuously absent when AUKUS was first announced in September, 2021. The three member countries are among this country’s closest allies, and like Canada they are members of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing partnership. National-security experts feared Canada, a laggard on defence spending, was being excluded from a new “Three Eyes” group.

Canada’s reason for wanting to join now is not to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, like Australia, but rather to participate in the second pillar of the AUKUS agreement, the two sources, both senior government officials, said. This non-nuclear part of AUKUS provides for information-sharing and close co-operation on accelerating development of cutting-edge technologies, including undersea defence capabilities, artificial intelligence, quantum technology and hypersonic warfare.

The Globe and Mail is not naming the officials, because they are not authorized to speak publicly on security matters.

The AUKUS partnership was initially framed as an effort to deepen diplomatic, security and defence co-operation in the Indo-Pacific region. Under it, the United States is sharing nuclear-propulsion technology with Australia, as it has with Britain for more than half a century. New submarines will be built for the British and Australians using a combination of British submarine design and U.S. technology.

After the pact was announced, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau played down Canada’s exclusion. “This is a deal for nuclear submarines, which Canada is not currently or any time soon in the market for,” he told reporters.

China, which has an estimated 12 nuclear-powered submarines, has condemned AUKUS as a threat to peace in the Indo-Pacific.

One of the sources said the information-sharing aspect of the second pillar of AUKUS is significant. It has the potential to create a closer circle of sharing among three members of Five Eyes but not the other two, they said.

The source said there is continuing work by the Department of Global Affairs and the Privy Council Office to sign up Canada for AUKUS.

The second source said Canada is waiting to see how the existing three AUKUS members frame the terms of Canada’s possible participation. The official noted that the Communications Security Establishment, Canada’s eavesdropping and surveillance agency, already shares intelligence with its Five Eyes allies, and could expand this work.

The Five Eyes alliance, which consists of the U.S., Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, dates back 75 years. Members share signals intelligence gleaned from intercepted communications, as well as military intelligence and intelligence gathered directly from human sources.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819465

File: 06cda2a2b5f9633⋯.jpg (299.47 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Anthony_Albanese_Joe_Biden….jpg)

>>18819462

2/2

Stephanie Carvin, an associate professor of international relations at Carleton University and a former national-security analyst, has been working with Thomas Juneau, an associate professor in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa, on a paper about the future of Canada’s relations with AUKUS. She said that if the nuclear submarine deal between Australia, the United States and Britain was “AUKUS 1.0,” then the expanding technological co-operation represents what she calls “AUKUS 2.0.”

Prof. Carvin said it would make sense for Canada to join AUKUS 2.0. “We haven’t had a robust military presence in the Pacific since the 1950s. But that being said, China has an interest in the Arctic. It’s sending icebreakers and ships and buoys. So it does make sense for Canada as an Arctic nation, especially if we’re looking at new naval technologies that will be important to defence.”

There are different opinions in the Canadian security and defence community as to whether Canada needs to join AUKUS. Skeptics say it’s primarily a deal for Australia to acquire nuclear propulsion technology and that it won’t curb any intelligence sharing or co-operation among Five Eyes partners.

But Prof. Carvin said there is worry in the security and defence community that the trilateral pact could one day supplant the existing intelligence order. “I think the concern is that this is the start of a trend that could eventually impact Five Eyes,” she said.

She said the question for Canada and its allies is what benefits Canada might bring to AUKUS.

“It was very clear to me that Canada has always been welcome to join, but we have to bring something to the table,” Prof. Carvin said. “Canada is very good at certain kinds of Arctic technologies and mapping and artificial intelligence.”

In March, New Zealand’s government said it is discussing joining the non-nuclear part of the AUKUS arrangement, according to a report in The Guardian.

“We have been offered the opportunity to talk about whether we could or wish to participate in that pillar-two aspect of it,” Andrew Little, New Zealand’s defence minister, said in March. “I’ve indicated we will be willing to explore it.”

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-canada-eyes-entry-into-aukus-alliance-to-help-keep-china-in-check/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819512

File: d87ef1c62dedde8⋯.jpg (485.26 KB,1920x1280,3:2,US_ambassador_Caroline_Ken….jpg)

File: b06b9ba81c6368c⋯.jpg (464.11 KB,1756x1318,878:659,FvpXPLNaQAIZxKo.jpg)

>>18676828

Caroline Kennedy meets Assange supporters, fuelling breakthrough hopes

Matthew Knott - May 9, 2023

A cross-party delegation of Australian politicians has met United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy to increase the pressure on the Biden administration to drop its pursuit of Julian Assange and warn the WikiLeaks founder’s ongoing incarceration risks undermining the US-Australia alliance.

Assange’s supporters feel heartened by Kennedy’s decision to hold the meeting and are cautiously optimistic that momentum is building for a breakthrough on Assange’s case as he continues to languish in London’s high-security Belmarsh Prison.

The highly sought-after meeting comes at a pivotal moment, just a fortnight before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hosts Joe Biden for his first presidential visit to Australia, and days after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton significantly shifted his rhetoric on Assange’s case.

Kennedy hosted members of the Parliamentary Friends of Julian Assange Group - Labor MPs Julian Hill and Josh Wilson, Liberal MP Bridget Archer, Independent MP Andrew Wilkie and Greens senator David Shoebridge - for a working breakfast on Tuesday at the US embassy in Canberra to hear their views on the issue.

The delegation members stressed that while they had differing views on an array of political topics, they all agreed the case against Assange had dragged on for too long, and he should be allowed to return to Australia.

Wilkie said he hoped the meeting signalled the Biden administration was interested in a “fresh start” on the issue.

“This is an intensely important time with the US President about to visit,” Wilkie said.

“It would be very unhelpful if he comes to Australia and this issue is still unresolved, it will hang over us all in an uncomfortable way. The US and Australia have a very important and close relationship, and it’s time to demonstrate that.”

Asked about the argument that the US justice process should be allowed to play out independently, Wilkie said: “This has always been an inherently political matter and it needs a political solution.”

A spokeswoman for the US Embassy confirmed the meeting had happened but declined to comment further.

Assange’s brother Gabriel Shipton said it was a “good sign” Kennedy had agreed to the meeting and thanked the MPs for presenting a petition of 26,000 signatures calling for Assange to be freed.

“It’s significant that the US government is aware of the considerable support for Julian inside the parliament as well as among the public,” he said.

Hill, who led the push for the meeting, said: “I thanked the ambassador for her willingness to engage, so she can communicate the strength of views across the political spectrum on this issue back to Washington, D.C.

“We communicated that the US needs to lead a political resolution on this issue and bring the matter to a close.

“Aside from the issues at stake in Julian’s case, the delay in resolving it is an unwelcome distraction from AUKUS and our work with the US to confront the strategic challenges we face.”

Biden will address a joint sitting of parliament in Canberra in a fortnight before travelling to Sydney for the Quad leaders’ summit alongside Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida.

Albanese last week said he was frustrated by his inability to convince the Biden administration to drop its extradition request for Assange, saying he had left United States officials with no doubt about his position on the matter.

Dutton – who had previously been highly critical of Assange – followed by saying that Assange’s case had gone on for too long and should be brought to a conclusion.

The United States Justice Department has charged Assange with 17 counts of breaching the Espionage Act, plus a separate hacking-related charge, and has been seeking to extradite him from the United Kingdom since 2019.

Shoebridge described the meeting with Kennedy as “productive”, saying it allowed the parliamentarians an opportunity to convey the widespread support for the US to drop its extradition case against Assange.

“The fact that the ambassador allocated precious time to this issue ahead of President Biden’s visit is a useful indication of the visibility of the campaign to free Assange.

“The end of Australia’s ‘quiet diplomacy’ on Assange last week is an important step forward and brings us closer to a just conclusion of the ongoing persecution of Julian Assange.”

Archer said: “I feel quite positive following the meeting this morning that we had a very good hearing with the ambassador and we will continue to work together to keep the momentum going with this issue, to keep the pressure up in relation to Mr Assange and hopefully to see him returned to Australia soon.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/caroline-kennedy-meets-with-assange-supporters-fuelling-breakthrough-hopes-20230509-p5d6vc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819524

File: c3406f5ff08a5e3⋯.jpg (127.11 KB,1200x720,5:3,China_Australia_economic_a….jpg)

File: b97412e142ded57⋯.jpg (77.1 KB,800x480,5:3,Xiao_Qian_China_s_ambassad….jpg)

Exclusive: China-Australia economic and trade relations are facing an important window period: Chinese Ambassador

Global Times - May 08, 2023

China-Australia economic and trade relations are facing an important window period. The two sides have important consensus on jointly maintaining the positive momentum of bilateral relations, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian told the Global Times in a written interview.

The recent resumption of exchanges and cooperation between China and Australia in various fields fully demonstrates that despite some differences, the two sides have a strong desire for communication and exchanges and share broad and profound common interests. This year is crucial for the steady and sound development of China-Australia relations, said Xiao.

During the upcoming visit of Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell, the Chinese and Australian economic and trade ministers can have in-depth exchanges on topics of their respective concern and common interest and discuss future cooperation, the Chinese ambassador said.

"I look forward to Minister Farrell's visit to further promote practical cooperation between Australia and China for the benefit of both peoples," said Xiao.

As a direct result of improving bilateral relations, Australian exports to China surged to a nearly two-year high and a second high in history in March, reaching about A$19 billion ($12.8 billion), up 31 percent year-on-year, according to statistics released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics on Thursday.

The rise in exports to China has left Australia with a trade surplus of about A$15.3 billion, which means, without or with fewer exports to China, Australia would have witnessed a trade deficit in March.

However, Xiao stressed that the Australian side should respect China's core interests as a prerequisite and political foundation to improve, maintain and develop bilateral relations.

The ambassador said China is firmly opposed to the AUKUS clique of the US, the UK and Australia, which is pushing forward nuclear-powered submarine program and coercing the International Atomic Energy Agency to endorse it.

It should be pointed out that AUKUS nuclear submarine cooperation carries significant nuclear proliferation risks. The US, the UK and Australia nuclear submarine cooperation sets a bad precedent, which will have a negative impact on the settlement of regional nuclear hotspot issues, Xiao stressed.

"At the same time, we hope that the Australian side will earnestly abide by the one-China principle, which is an important prerequisite and political foundation for improving, maintaining and developing China-Australia relations, and earnestly respect each other's core interests and major concerns," said Xiao.

He also stressed that the so-called economic coercion by China against Australia is completely false.

"As far as I am concerned, the Australian side has the following concerns: First, the Chinese government has conducted anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations on certain imported goods from Australia on the basis of the application of relevant domestic industries. The relevant processes are conducted in strict accordance with Chinese laws and WTO rules.

"Second, Chinese people were angry at the wrong words and deeds of the previous Australian government and were unwilling to buy Australian goods and services.

"Third, due to a series of actions by the Australian side, some Chinese companies have become more cautious and vigilant about cooperation with Australia, and their willingness and confidence to invest in Australia have declined, and thus they have made their own decisions. Fundamentally speaking, this is all a response to the wrong words and deeds of the previous Australian government," said Xiao.

At present, China-Australia relations are showing a momentum of stable and sound development, and bilateral economic and trade relations are facing an important window period. The two sides should make joint efforts to inject more positive factors into economic and trade cooperation.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290312.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819570

File: 28d928b94ff90db⋯.mp4 (15.91 MB,640x360,16:9,Victims_of_disgraced_paedo….mp4)

>>18438482 (pb)

>>18438493 (pb)

Victims of paedophile Rolf Harris, 93, speak out as new documentary shows the moment pervert jokes with Jimmy Savile about keeping little girl 'safe'

OLIVER PRICE - 9 May 2023

1/2

A new ITVX documentary has unearthed disturbing footage of Rolf Harris joking with Jimmy Savile about leaving a little girl 'safely in his arms'.

The popular TV hosts - who, unbeknownst to audiences, were both prolific sex offenders - were filmed together in an episode of Savile's BBC series Jim'll Fix It in 1976.

The clip shows Savile reading a letter submitted by a little girl named Lynn, requesting to watch Harris as creates one of his famous paintings.

The young girl is then seen on stage with the pair as Savile jokingly asks Harris if he may 'leave her in your charge?'

Harris pipes back: 'Safely leave her in my capable hands here...'

Once the drawing is complete, Savile rejoins the pair on stage as Harris tells his co-host: 'She is anxious to run away.'

Savile then jokes that he has 'got fast hold of her', while Harris adds: 'You stay here and enjoy it, girl.'

Australian-born Harris was a family favourite in the UK for decades before he was convicted of 12 indecent assaults at London's Southwark Crown Court in June 2014 - which included a catalogue of abuse against his daughter's friend over 16 years.

The victim has given permission for the impact of her abuse to be told through her psychotherapist Chip Somers in new ITV series Rolf Harris: Hiding In Plain Sight which documents the rise and fall of the TV host, entertainer and artist.

It was revealed last year that Harris can no longer talk or eat and requires around the clock care after being diagnosed with neck cancer.

Neighbours and friends said the convicted sex offender had become 'gravely sick' after his release from prison in 2017.

Harris now lives a reclusive life in the village of Bray, Berkshire with his wife Alwen Hughes, who is suffering from Alzheimer's disease.

He is also being sued by an alleged victim who claims sexually assaulted her at an Australian adventure camp when she was ten years old.

The alleged victim claimed Harris, 92, molested her while she was at a school holiday camp in Melbourne in 1982.

Now, another woman has claimed she was sexually assaulted by the disgraced children's entertainer when she was aged 10 and in foster care.

The two-part documentary will hear how the woman went to Mr Somers in the late 1990s for help with an alcohol problem before it 'became apparent that there was a huge secret that she was holding on to'.

Mr Somers explains: 'She told me she had been sexually abused by Rolf Harris from the age of 13, and this went on for a number of years.

'Her choice was to not say anything about it, but it caused her a lot of trauma and was instrumental in causing her to misuse alcohol as a way of anaesthetising that trauma... a momentary respite from having to carry that burden all the time.'

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18819575

File: 72c05a0ccb6d60c⋯.jpg (69.66 KB,634x437,634:437,Popular_TV_hosts_Jimmy_Sav….jpg)

File: 9c286c4506484f3⋯.jpg (85.77 KB,634x476,317:238,Australian_make_up_artist_….jpg)

File: 2c109f3dae4cfc5⋯.jpg (135.11 KB,634x1061,634:1061,Rolf_Harris_pictured_perfo….jpg)

File: 6df8b41b5f35214⋯.jpg (125.75 KB,634x795,634:795,Rolf_Harris_centre_arrives….jpg)

File: 4f57feb40422110⋯.jpg (140.48 KB,634x1069,634:1069,Disgraced_paedophile_Rolf_….jpg)

>>18819570

2/2

As her relationship with Harris became more intimate, Mr Somers says Harris was clear in his message to her: 'She is also quite clearly told, "This is something that you cannot talk about. Do not tell anybody about this. This is our little secret. I am a powerful person, I have money, so tread carefully".'

The psychotherapist added: 'She was having to carry this incredible secret, this incredible burden, this incredible sense of guilt and disgust and hatred of what is happening to her.

'Trauma thrives in darkness and Rolf Harris made quite sure that she was shrouded in darkness.'

The programme will also feature alleged victims Suzi Dent and Karen Gardner, who waived their right to anonymity.

In the first episode of the two-part series, Australian make-up artist Ms Dent alleges Harris sexually assaulted her when she was 23 and working on a programme he appeared on in 1985.

Ms Gardner alleges she was assaulted three times in plain sight in the space of 35 minutes at the age of 16 when she was carrying Harris's bag on the set of Star Games in Cambridge in 1978.

Ms Gardner says: 'He said to me, "You're irresistible". I was 16. He was 48. He was 10 years older than my dad.'

Harris was acquitted of assaulting Ms Gardner after the jury could not reach a verdict at two trials, and Ms Dent's allegations of assault were not tried in court because they occurred outside the UK.

Harris, now 93, was convicted of 12 indecent assaults at London's Southwark Crown Court in June 2014.

These included one on an eight-year-old autograph hunter, two on girls in their early teens, and a catalogue of abuse against his daughter's friend over 16 years.

Following his conviction, Harris was stripped of his CBE - which he received after painting the Queen's 80th birthday portrait.

In May 2017 he was formally cleared of four unconnected historical sex offences, which he had denied.

Later the same year, one of the 12 indecent assault convictions was overturned by the Court of Appeal.

Rolf Harris: Hiding In Plain Sight will air on ITVX from May 18.

If you or anyone you know needs support, in the UK you can call the Rape Crisis sex abuse hotline (0808 500 2222).

https://rapecrisis.org.uk/get-help/want-to-talk/

https://rapecrisis.org.uk/

In Australia you can call the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12060567/Rolf-Harris-warned-daughters-friend-abused-tread-carefully-victims-speak-new-ITVX-doc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824011

File: 4400fc88881d881⋯.jpg (132.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_SC_at_a_pub….jpg)

File: 6fb29ab1b0cec9c⋯.jpg (131.37 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Liberal_Party_staff….jpg)

>>18708667

Shane Drumgold SC feared conspiracy in Bruce Lehrmann rape case

REMY VARGA and KRISTIN SHORTEN - MAY 10, 2023

1/3

ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold SC has accused police who investigated rape allegations made by Brittany Higgins of “feeding inaccurate information” in a bid to derail the case against Bruce Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold told the Sofronoff inquiry on Wednesday said he became concerned because there had been “significant problems” and investigators had “displayed a passionate interest in not proceeding”.

Mr Drumgold said he expressed concern to investigators that a second AFP interview would traumatise Ms Higgins.

The Sofronoff inquiry heard the AFP wanted to conduct a second evidence-in-chief interview, which they subsequently did, to ask her about inconsistencies in her interviews with police.

Mr Drumgold on Wednesday said he was concerned about the second interview because it could be traumatic to Ms Higgins.

“If there’s an inconsistency it should be left for defence,” he said.

Mr Drumgold says he felt investigators wanted him to give them license not to charge Mr Lehrmann so a “political matter would go away” from the moment he received the evidence brief.

Mr Drumgold said he felt he was being pressured and pointed to Australian Federal Police commissioner Reece Kershaw flagging he would receive a brief of evidence in a Senate estimates hearing.

“I felt the plan may have been if they can give me the imprimatur not to charge then a political matter would go away,” he said.

“Then as time went on I felt their interests would lie with an unsuccessful prosecution.”

‘I foolishly thought media would give Higgins a break’

Mr Drumgold says he made a public statement linking the abandonment of a retrial of the case against Mr Lehrmann due to concerns for Ms Higgins’ mental health because he wanted the media to “give her a break”.

The ACT director of public prosecutions said he “probably shouldn’t have made the statement” and he was “naive” to think his comments would have dissuaded journalists from the story.

“I foolishly thought they might give her a break,” he said.

Mr Drumgold said there had been “no benefit” from his statement and he’d subsequently lost trust in the media after making his statement.

“The cost was making additional statements, the cost was bearing in mind I knew this decision would impact her state of mind,” he said.

“I really just was trying to lighten the load.”

On December 2 in 2022 Mr Drumgold announced he was abandoning a retrial of Mr Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Ms Higgins citing concern for the former ministerial staffer’s mental health.

On Wednesday Mr Drumgold said his comments were “burned on his memory”.

When asked if he had considered the impact of his speech on Mr Lehrmann, Mr Drumgold said he had sympathy for everyone involved in every case.

“Cases like this have no winners and loses they just have losers and losers. Before me was just a complainant in a very vulnerable position. That was weighing heavily on me at the time.”

When Mr Drumgold was asked if he had turned his mind to whether his statement might have impacted on Mr Lehrmann’s entitlement to a presumption of innocence, he said “I don’t know if it impinged the assumption of innocence.”

Mr Drumgold said his goal was “at least the media might back off” Ms Higgins.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824013

File: e368ef5520ec597⋯.jpg (74.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Lehrmann_has_strenuousl….jpg)

>>18824011

2/3

Drumgold questioned over letter to police

Counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC is questioning Mr Drumgold about a letter he sent warning of interference in the case and asking police to stay away from potential witnesses in the prosecution’s case.

He said at the time there was intense scrutiny of how the criminal justice system was failing victims of sexual assault and how police have “outdated attitudes” towards the behaviour of victims.

Mr Drumgold said a review into the treatment of sexual assault victims had just been released and he was concerned the Brittany Higgins case would fall into “the tranches” of the review.

When Mr Drumgold was asked if the letter lacked objectivity, he replied the letter “raises my own observations”.

He said the letter was an attempt to “put protections” for the complainant and said he perceived the police were “aligning themselves with an acquittal”.

“I’ve had a year and a half of police passionately telling me the matter shouldn’t proceed,” he said.

Mr Drumgold says he believed it possible a conspiracy against the case was afoot at the time he sent the letter.

When Ms Longbottom asked Mr Drumgold if he believed a conspiracy was afoot, he replied: “I had not formed a view solidly one way or another but I thought there were enough instances to make it possible if not probable.”

Mr Drumgold stressed again that police had for a year and a half told him he should not proceed including because Ms Higgins was “manipulative” and said investigators were trying to “snowball the prosecution”.

When Ms Longbottom asked Mr Drumgold if his perceptions had been coloured by his engagement with police, he conceded it was possible.

“Certainly your observations as a whole are formed by a collection of observations,” he said.

“As I keep saying my perception of the March 31st meeting was that they [police] were trying to snowball the prosecution.”

Drumgold ‘wanted to prosecute second trial’

Mr Drumgold said he formed a preliminary view he would prosecute a second trial against Mr Lehrmann in the event of a hung jury despite the fragility of Ms Higgins.

Mr Drumgold said he was communicating with Ms Higgins’ lawyer about the prospects of a second trial because the former Liberal staffer was “quite fragile”.

He said his motivation was to run a second trial as early as possible, which was in everyone’s best interest, and Ms Higgins views were relevant as to whether he retrialed the case against Mr Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold said four weeks after the jury decision would have given Ms Higgins an opportunity to “repair”.

Mr Drumgold said he became concerned over the connection between federal politics and engagement with the witness.

Mr Drumgold pointed to the fact he’d learnt he’d receive a brief of evidence on the case through a Senate estimates hearing and the Lehrmann case was unique because it involved Parliament House, politicians, the Logies and an emerging political movement relating to victims of sexual offences.

“The question really is are there enough circumstantial strands to raise concerns?,” he said.

“There were certainly enough circumstantial strands to raise my concerns. My question was how strong that cable was.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824015

File: 1ab029ed42ebb62⋯.jpg (169.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,Liberal_senator_Linda_Reyn….jpg)

>>18824013

3/3

Treatment of Senator Linda Reynolds queried

Mr Drumgold was grilled about how he treated Senator Reynolds during Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial last year.

The Board’s chair Walter Sofronoff KC and his counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC have honed in on a proposition Mr Drumgold put to Ms Reynolds when she took the stand during the high-profile court proceedings in October.

Mr Drumgold, who successfully applied to have Ms Reynolds declared a hostile witness at the trial, had essentially put to her – in front of the jury – that she had improperly arranged for her partner to attend court and tell her about Ms Higgins testimony.

During Ms Higgins’ evidence Mr Drumgold noticed Ms Reynolds partner sitting in the back of the courtroom.

Mr Drumgold recognised him because he had previously accompanied her to a proofing conference with the DPP.

“You arranged for your husband to sit in the back of the court, didn’t you?” Mr Drumgold had put to her.

Ms Reynolds had replied: “No, he’s not my husband, but my partner has been here in court, yes.”

Ms Longbottom asked Mr Drumgold what evidence he had based that proposition on.

“What evidence did you have to support, or what information did you have to support, that allegation of the fact?” she asked.

Mr Drumgold said the allegation was based on the fact that he had seen Ms Reynold’s partner in the courtroom.

“He lived in Perth and was in the court during the trial so if you‘re asking strong circumstantial inference that he hasn’t just got lost and wandered into a courtroom,” he said.

“I think it was accepted that it occurred that she had.”

Ms Longbottom asked if Mr Drumgold saw any problem with putting that to Ms Reynolds as an allegation.

“She was a witness in a trial,” he said.

“He knew that she was a witness in a trial and he ended up sitting in the courtroom.

“I felt that there was sufficient circumstantial evidence that she had facilitated that.”

Ms Longbottom asked if he was suggesting that Ms Reynolds asked him to attend court to monitor Ms Higgins’ evidence for an “improper purpose”.

“Your rationalisation for putting that proposition is that it was an inference that you drew from the fact that he was in the back of the courtroom?” she asked.

“Did you consider there might be a myriad of other explanations for why he was in the back of the courtroom?”

Mr Drumgold said that his proposition to Ms Reynolds was really just a question put in a particular style of courtroom interrogation.

“What you‘re deconstructing is a stylistic approach to puttage,” he said.

“What I’m saying to her there, ‘I’m suggesting to you, that your husband, that you arrange for your husband to sit in the back of the court’, which is really effectively saying ‘did you arrange for your husband to sit in the back of the court?’

“And she‘s clearly taken it as a question, because she’s answered it in the negative.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/shane-drumgold-sc-says-police-tried-to-derail-bruce-lehrmann-rape-case/news-story/ce66136e5b894f8d021fd87091c9fbd4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824025

File: 740e581e8e5fe98⋯.jpg (771.22 KB,3243x2162,3:2,Shane_Drumgold_thought_it_….jpg)

File: 46d457fcef710f0⋯.jpg (1.1 MB,4060x2707,4060:2707,Linda_Reynolds_and_Michael….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18824011

Senators reject DPP’s suggestion of political conspiracy in Lehrmann trial

Angus Thompson - May 10, 2023

1/2

Extraordinary allegations by the top prosecutor in the Bruce Lehrmann rape trial that there could have been a political conspiracy to derail the case have been vehemently denied by former Coalition ministers Michaelia Cash and Linda Reynolds.

In explosive evidence delivered before an inquiry into the abandoned trial of Lehrmann – a former Liberal Party staffer – ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold SC said a series of “strange events” throughout the case led him to believe there was federal interference in the politically charged case.

“One of the questions I’m raising is: is there a connection between federal interference with ACT Policing? That’s the primary concern that I have,” Drumgold responded to a question from inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff KC about why he didn’t want police to contact Cash and Reynolds, both witnesses in the trial.

The exchange was made in the context of questions in the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal about a letter Drumgold sent Police Chief Neil Gaughan on November 1, 2022, days after the trial was aborted, alleging police interference in the case and pressure against him prosecuting Lehrmann.

In the same letter, Drumgold accused Reynolds of trying to access transcripts of the trial through the defence team and of the “direct coaching” of the defence in its cross-examination of her former staff member Brittany Higgins, whose rape allegation against Lehrmann led to the high-profile prosecution.

Reynolds denied any wrongdoing when questioned by Drumgold on these fronts in the trial.

The letter and the leaking of police investigative materials critical of Higgins’ credibility and the evidence preceded the ACT government’s decision to probe the competence and conduct of authorities handling the case, placing the behaviour of Drumgold, senior police and former Coalition ministers under the spotlight.

Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to sexually assaulting Higgins in the Parliament House office of Reynolds, for whom the pair worked, after a night drinking with colleagues in March 2019. The trial was aborted in late October due to juror misconduct, and a retrial was abandoned due to Drumgold’s fears for Higgins’ mental health.

When counsel assisting the inquiry, Erin Longbottom, KC, asked whether he thought “there was a conspiracy afoot,” Drumgold responded, “I had not formed a view one way or the other, but I thought there was enough instances to make it possible if not probable”.

On a day in which Drumgold also emotionally expressed regret for a public statement he made in support of Higgins, his testimony spurred both Reynolds and Cash to reject his allegations of political interference, saying they were without foundation.

“Mr Drumgold SC intimated that I may have exerted political pressure on the AFP in the conduct of the investigation or somehow interfered in the investigation. I reject this suggestion categorically and consider it an affront to my reputation,” Reynolds said in a statement released on Wednesday afternoon.

“This suggestion is baseless and without any foundation. In fact, it was me who referred Ms Higgins to the AFP on 1 April 2019.”

Cash, who employed Higgins in her office after Reynolds in 2019, was declared an unfavourable witness by Drumgold during the trial, in which she denied knowing about the allegation while Higgins was working for her and agreed any cover-up would have been political suicide.

She denied Drumgold’s assertions in almost identical words to Reynolds.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824030

File: 71b530db0daecf8⋯.jpg (1.74 MB,4783x3189,4783:3189,Bruce_Lehrmann_arrives_at_….jpg)

>>18824025

2/2

Drumgold, who accused police pressuring against the prosecution of losing their objectivity, said one of his hypotheses about the conduct he observed was a “government minister exerting pressure through a federal commissioner onto ACT Policing to make the matter go away”.

Asked by Sofronoff “why would you think that?” Drumgold replied, “I’m looking at circumstantial strands. I’m looking at enthusiastic engagement by a senator, I’m looking at unprecedented pressure being placed on me and unprecedented actions being, a number of police held [the view] this matter shouldn’t proceed, and a number of other factors”.

He did not name the senator.

During the trial, Drumgold had questioned Reynolds about her partner sitting at the back of the courtroom while she was giving evidence. She said she had not spoken to him about her evidence as it was made plain to her that was unacceptable.

Drumgold told the inquiry he believed there was enough circumstantial evidence Reynolds – a senator for Western Australia – had arranged for her partner to sit in the back of the courtroom for an “improper purpose”.

Sofronoff said the circumstantial evidence was simply the partner’s presence, to which Drumgold replied, “just his presence in a trial his partner is giving evidence in, on the other side of the country”.

During the hearing on Wednesday, Drumgold fought back tears when he admitted he “probably” shouldn’t have made supportive statements of Higgins when he fronted a media conference on December 2 announcing there would be no retrial of Lehrmann.

Longbottom took Drumgold to the part of his press conference in which he said, “Miss Higgins has faced a level of personal attack that I have not seen in over 20 years of doing this work. She has done so with bravery, grace and dignity, and it is my hope that this will now stop, and Miss Higgins will be allowed to heal”.

Drumgold said, “I realised I probably shouldn’t have done it” and became emotional as he said, “I foolishly thought [the media] might give her a break”.

Asked whether he had turned his mind to the effect his statement would have on Lehrmann, who had pleaded not guilty to raping Higgins and has maintained his innocence, he said, “possibly not as much as I should have”.

The inquiry was told earlier that ACT Policing deputy commissioner Joanne Cameron warned her police offers against speaking with Lehrmann’s barristers less than two weeks before a senior investigator allegedly told defence lawyer Steven Whybrow he would resign if the jury found him guilty.

Documentation tendered to the inquiry showed Cameron emailed Drumgold on October 12, 2022, to say she held concerns about Lehrmann’s defence approaching potential police witnesses while the trial was under way.

“I hold a view that such approaches are at the very least inappropriate from the perspective of effecting the prosecution of the matter and an attempt to influence the giving of any future evidence by my members, and even the sheer fact of the perception generated by the fact that Defence counsel and police are communicating, is not acceptable,” Cameron told Drumgold.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/police-commander-urged-officers-not-to-speak-to-lehrmann-defence-20230510-p5d766.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824039

File: 9959c128b197c1b⋯.jpg (99.46 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>18708667

How often can a Director of Public Prosecutions fall short of his duties?

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - MAY 10, 2023

1/2

Two days into the Sofronoff board of inquiry and there is a common pattern to questioning and a common theme to answers.

The pattern of questioning is as follows: counsel assisting the inquiry, Erin Longbottom KC, puts to Shane Drumgold questions to establish what the law is – whether it is about the ACT prosecution policy or rules that operate under the Evidence Act, or ACT procedural rules, or otherwise.

The ACT Public Prosecutor agrees to what the policy, the laws or the rules say.

Next, Longbottom asks Drumgold what he did in various circumstances of his carriage of the rape trial. Drumgold then describes what he says he did.

Then, with forensic thoroughness, Longbottom looks at what he actually did, using emails, file notes, affidavits and other documents rather than rely on what he says he did. In other words, did he – in practice, not in his mind or according to his statement – comply with his duties under law?

The concerns keep growing that he may not have done so.

When serious issues about his behaviour were put to him on Tuesday, common themes emerged from his answers. These included that he “didn’t turn my mind to it”, “I had not perused it in that degree of detail”, “I was not looking at it through that prism”, “I can’t recall it jumping into my mind”, “That’s an error on my behalf”, “I didn’t pay sufficient attention”, “I had too cursory a read”, “I clearly overlooked it”, and so on. These are his words.

Tuesday’s hearing kicked off with Longbottom making more inquiries about how the DPP exercised his duty to disclose material to the defence. In an email exchange with a junior solicitor in his office in June 2022, the DPP gave advice that a set of documents called the Moller report was the subject of legal professional privilege – making them non-disclos­able to the lawyers for Bruce Lehrmann.

Within minutes of the hearing commencing, Drumgold admitted to the inquiry that he had not read one of the documents – a review conducted by Commander Andrew Smith and other police officers in August 2021. Despite receiving an email that listed and attached the documents, he expressed the opinion that privilege did apply even though he had not looked at the Smith report.

Inquiry head Walter Sofronoff said he found it hard to accept that “a barrister giving advice about whether particular documents carry a particular legal status would not look at each document”.

Drumgold confirmed he had not. “I didn’t pay sufficient attention,” he said. “That’s an error on my behalf,” he told the inquiry.

The effect of Drumgold’s erroneous judgment was that he persisted, for months, in keeping internal police documents from the defence. Indeed, he opposed a disclosure application brought in September 2022 by defence lawyer Steven Whybrow SC.

Sofronoff explained to Drumgold that while his receipt, as DPP, of the Moller report may well be the subject of a privilege claim, that does not mean each separate document, written by police and addressed to other police officers, was non-disclosable.

Drumgold said: “I didn’t think (the Moller report) should fall into the hands of the defence.”

His concern was that disclosing these documents to the defence would be “crushing” to the complainant, Brittany Higgins.

Sofronoff pointed out that even information that may be harmful may need to be disclosed to the ­defence if, as in this case, it contained information gathered by the police that might put the ­defence on a train of inquiry to find evidence and material that might not ­otherwise be obvious to them in forming their defence.

In other words, while concerns for a complainant are understandable, the defendant’s rights and interests also matter, and public interest in a scrupulously fair trial should override concerns for any one individual.

There was a lot of explaining on day two of this inquiry. Longbottom reminded Drumgold that a prosecutor’s duty of disclosure is owed to the court to ensure a fair trial. The reason is simple and logical: the legitimacy of our criminal justice system depends on the trust we, the community, have in that system. Only a system that guarantees a fair trial, that genuinely searches for the truth, will gain, and retain our trust. Maintaining that trust is essential.

And fair disclosure of information by those in power – police and prosecutors – is critical.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824041

File: fde3e96682f09e5⋯.jpg (129.85 KB,1280x720,16:9,Sofronoff_inquiry_DPP_Shan….jpg)

>>18824039

2/2

The other issue that confronted Drumgold on Tuesday was his instruction to a junior solicitor to swear an affidavit that Drumgold would rely on to oppose the defence’s disclosure application to receive the Moller Report.

Drumgold initially told Longbottom that though he, as Director, was ultimately responsible for the document, “I think you might be overstating my input into the preparation of the document.”

Then Longbottom produced an email dated 12 September 2022 where Drumgold emailed the young solicitor with precise wording to be included in the affidavit. The affidavit sworn by the young solicitor that same day reflected this direct instruction from his boss.

Counsel assisting put to Drumgold that this affidavit drafted on his instruction was in breach of Rule 6711 of the ACT Procedure Rules. The Inquiry heard that the upshot of this failure was to potentially mislead the court that the AFP had told the solicitor they had claimed privilege over the Moller Report, when in fact the source of that piece of information was none other than the DPP.

Drumgold said it was “unintentional.”

“We do aim to have no errors at all ever. Sometimes we may fall short,” he said.

Drumgold also conceded that he was inferring the document was privileged, that he had not asked the author why the document was created, and his inference was, therefore, wrong. It was an inference that Drumgold made even though the Moller Report consisted of a series of internal documents essentially addressed to one set of coppers from another about the investigation.

Another issue that the DPP admitted to getting wrong concerned Higgins’ private counselling notes. Even though she consented to them being handed over to the police, the Evidence Act sets up a framework to protect the confidentiality of these kinds of communications.

They are treated as protected material, even if a complainant consents to them being handed over. They must not be disclosed, or accessed — by police, by defence lawyers or by the prosecution. It is this system that allows people to access counselling services in full confidence that they can speak privately and freely.

These were accidentally sent by police to Lehrmann’s first lawyer, John Korn, on a USB. He realised the material was protected and returned the USB stick; a data investigation subsequently determined he had not accessed the notes.

Drumgold was horrified about the wrongful disclosure to Korn and informed Higgins. Yet the only person who looked at these protected counselling notes was Drumgold. He didn’t tell Higgins he had accessed these notes.

When asked on Tuesday if he realised that his reading the protected counselling notes was in breach of the Evidence Act, Drumgold said: “I wouldn’t even have turned my mind to it.” He said he was acting “on the run” and in hindsight agreed he was “probably in breach” of the law.

The recurring question, even at this early stage, is how often can a prosecutor fall short of his duties before he is judged to have failed in his role as a minister of justice?

There is no doubt this was a high-profile, high-pressure investigation and trial. It occurred in the glare of the media, given Higgins’s choice to speak first to the media before proceeding with a formal complaint. It was coloured by activists who saw Higgins as the face of the #metoo movement, forgetting this was an allegation only.

There was a vulnerable complainant at the centre of it. Government ministers and their staff were being impugned.

All sorts of cases come to a prosecutor. As a prosecutor, exercising all the powers of the state against a citizen, he or she must be equipped, both professionally and temperamentally, to carry out their role regardless of the kind of case it is.

There was also a young man, the defendant, at the centre of this, who was entitled to a fair trial.

Sofronoff will have to determine whether Drumgold, who, by his own admission, has said he did not turn his mind to a range of matters that he should have considered, lost objectivity, meaning he failed to exercise his extraordinary powers in line with his duties. In short, did a form of zealousness that is dangerous to justice set in at some point during this fiasco?

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/how-often-can-a-director-of-public-prosecutions-fall-short-of-his-duties/news-story/4a576be21f7b41c7ebe9d1ea0b8b3dd9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824052

File: ffa6e21f049255e⋯.jpg (78.29 KB,1200x675,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_has_lost….jpg)

>>18744643

Roberts-Smith still barred from Defence diary entries

Jack Gramenz - May 10, 2023

Former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith will not receive access to diary and calendar entries showing possible meetings between a war crimes inquiry head and a journalist after nearly six years and multiple appeals.

The SAS corporal and Victoria Cross recipient, who has sued media outlets for defamation over reports of his alleged conduct while deployed in Afghanistan, applied to access diary entries of Major General Paul Brereton "evidencing dealings" with journalist Chris Masters for a book about Australia's involvement in the war.

Mr Roberts-Smith was blocked from accessing three diary entries and a calendar entry.

The Office of the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force (IGADF), under Maj Gen Brereton as assistant inspector-general, had undertaken the Afghanistan Inquiry to see whether there was any truth to "persistent rumours of criminal or unlawful conduct" by Australian soldiers.

Access to the entries was refused on grounds it could prejudice the investigation and would be contrary to Maj Gen Brereton's legal direction.

Mr Roberts-Smith unsuccessfully applied for an internal review.

A second application under the Freedom of Information Act to the Information Commissioner reiterated disclosure would be contrary to legal requirements in August 2022.

The decision then went to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), however it has maintained Mr Roberts-Smith cannot access the documents.

The IGADF had abandoned a claim that providing them could prejudice an investigation, which the tribunal said was presumably because the Afghanistan Inquiry had ended.

However, it maintained giving Mr Roberts-Smith access to the sought material could reveal the identities of confidential informants and would be contrary to the public interest.

He argued there were restrictions on disclosing evidence given to an inquiry and the documents it received, but not on the disclosure of the identities of people who had met with the inspector-general's office.

The previous rejections were beyond the regulatory power available and not validly issued, he submitted.

The tribunal noted he ultimately accepted it did not have the power to determine the validity of prior directions.

It was upheld that disclosing the diary entries and the calendar entry would involve unreasonable disclosures of personal information and would be contrary to the public interest.

Mr Roberts-Smith argued there would be no prejudice to ongoing investigations authorities are conducting and the tribunal agreed.

However, if the information was disclosed it would likely discourage people assisting future inquiries.

"The public interest is not served by permitting a person's confidential participation in an inquiry of the kind underlying this dispute, or of similar or analogous kinds, to be disclosed," AAT deputy president Tom Thawley wrote in a decision published on Wednesday.

Lifeline 13 11 14

Open Arms 1800 011 046

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.openarms.gov.au/

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/crime/roberts-smith-still-barred-from-defence-diary-entries-c-10608351

http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/AATA//2023/1095.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824070

File: d9a03f30b71bb72⋯.jpg (327.32 KB,1339x740,1339:740,POTUS_27.jpg)

File: f22b0c300c541cd⋯.jpg (338.15 KB,1339x740,1339:740,POTUS_28.jpg)

>>18432793 (pb)

>>18755069

>>18795008

Donald J. Trump Truths

Bill Barr was a sloppy, lethargic mess as the Attorney General. He was lazy as hell, and petrified of the Radical Left Democrats, & the fact that they were going to impeach him. I wish they had, which would have meant that he was doing his job, which he wasn’t. Bad on Election Fraud & just about everything else he touched, Sloppy Bill is now a human sound bite, along with Karl Rove, Wacky Peggy “I hate Reagan” Noonan, & Paul Ryan, for Rupert Murdoch & his ANTI-TRUMP (just like 2016!) WSJ, Plus!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110339492971171606

---

Rupert Murdoch, “Worst Republican Speaker ever” Paul Ryan, RINO KARL ROVE, The Wall Street Globalist Journal, and the rapidly disintegrating FoxNews, have gone all out, over the last 3 months, pushing and promoting Ron DeSanctimonious, a man who, without the help and Endorsement of President Donald J. Trump, would now be working at a McDonalds or, at a minimum, be far away from Tallahassee. Anyway, all of this RINO/GLOBALIST push from Election Undenier Murdoch has crushed DeSanctus in the Polls!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110339638682914515

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18824096

File: baefdeb984f370d⋯.jpg (434.68 KB,825x1211,825:1211,VRG_113.jpg)

File: 455e21ef04b598b⋯.jpg (84.13 KB,797x705,797:705,FvckK36WcAEagu4.jpg)

>>18805504

Count Inland Vampire Tweet

Nothing is beating this today. Nada.

Whoever owns this placard, I love you with all my heart.

#notallheroeswearcapes

#GodSaveVirginiaGuiffre

@VRSVirginia

https://twitter.com/InlandEmpire777/status/1654831159941971969

Virginia Roberts Giuffre Tweet

Humbled ♥️

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1655418280633597952

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829336

File: 7e2d6a03261ac2d⋯.jpg (491.93 KB,1658x1244,829:622,Linda_Burney_embraces_Anth….jpg)

File: 39625ca20497f05⋯.jpg (370.03 KB,903x1382,903:1382,Statements_from_the_Soul_T….jpg)

File: b6e95fd8081d27f⋯.jpg (122.45 KB,667x1000,667:1000,Beyond_Belief_Rethinking_T….jpg)

>>18676743

Should you vote for the voice?

It is clear that the voice model was designed in a rush and not cognisant of the complexity that exists in Aboriginal affairs.

VICTORIA GRIEVES WILLIAMS - May 11, 2023

1/2

Australia is caught in a complex debate about how to best serve the political interests of Aboriginal people.

The aim, we are told, is to redress the problem of a power imbalance that impacts on the First Nations. Two new books aim to inform us, as we approach the referendum on the Albanese government’s proposed solution: the Voice to parliament.

They are very different books. I recommend them both as perhaps compulsory reading before you go to the ballot box since they are representative of both sides of the debate. While both are valuable, it is my considered opinion that one is more convincing than the other.

The contributors to the first book, Statements From The Soul, are writing primarily about the need to recognise Aboriginal people as the rightful, sovereign peoples of Australia, and to be truthful about the shattering history of colonial takeover and subsequent disregard for all things “Aboriginal”.

Indigenous broadcaster Stan Grant’s chapter opens the book with a philosophical argument for righting historical wrongs, based on Christian teachings. The image of the burning community church is searing, particularly as the mission churches were deliberately burnt down (it was assumed by activists) at that time, at Three-Mile Reserve, and right across NSW.

Some contributors seek forgiveness for what their colonial ancestors were responsible for. Essentially, they see a need to make amends. There are some lovely stories in this book, but it was disappointing for me that it did not include a detailed discussion of Aboriginal spirituality. This is a glaring omission. Ajmer Singh Gill, a Sikh, has researched Aboriginal spirituality and finds affinity with his beliefs. Other than that, very few contributors seemed to actually know any Aboriginal people (the exceptions are the delightful Hindu dancer Prakruthi Mysore Gururaj who experienced “a moment of spiritual integration” after being welcomed into the Gunggari women‘s circle; and Wesam Charkawi a Sydney-based Imam who travels to Northern Australia with Muslim youth to explore the historical Muslim connections from Sulawesi with yolngu.)

The second book, Beyond Belief, argues against the Voice, which has of course grown out of the Uluru Statement from the Heart. The contributors are invariably constitutional conservatives and Liberals. I refer to the Voice as having “grown out” of the Uluru Statement because we are still very short of detail and what detail we have is not impressive in terms of serving Aboriginal people well.

The Uluru Statement from the Heart is a request of the Australian people and government to now recognise the First Nations as the original inhabitants, with our own laws and customs, and whose “ancient sovereignty can shine through” with “substantive constitutional change and structural reform”.

So, clearly, this is a bid for political power, built on an idea of atonement for transgressions of the past.

Many Aboriginal people were taken by surprise to see the Voice coming up front and centre. Even those who were at the meeting at the Yulara Resort say there was no consensus to promote Voice ahead of Truth and Treaty. Many Aboriginal people support a treaty first of all and understood it would be a priority.

For others, who perhaps were not there, it seemed to have been a given that “Truth Telling” or “Truth Talking” would lay the groundwork for future developments.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829342

File: c5d07010d0952cb⋯.jpg (102.16 KB,1024x768,4:3,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 9a1236f6fbea81f⋯.jpg (275.37 KB,1024x768,4:3,Yolngu_children_sit_in_a_h….jpg)

>>18829336

2/2

For the editors of the second book, it is “beyond belief” that the Voice is the only way to achieve reconciliation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people – and that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese committed his new government to a referendum on the Voice and on Recognition (rather than separating the two questions) at Garma, July 2022.

It is also “beyond belief” that anyone would want to change the Constitution for this purpose, or perhaps at all.

The book reflects a great knowledge of the history and the machinations of the Australian constitution and politics, which is extremely useful background. There are convincing arguments against this kind of constitutional change at this time. It is clear that the Voice model was designed in a rush and not cognisant of the complexity that exists in Aboriginal affairs.

The Voice would also, strangely, change the nature of our democracy that is predicated on the value of equality of all citizens. It threatens to reintroduce segregation to Australian society via the Constitution and the parliament. We have already seen the division this model has caused, the race hate that has emerged weirdly from the proponents of the YES vote when they accuse NO vote proponents of racism. Certain structural arrangements encourage attitudes and beliefs – this is what the Voice to Parliament is already doing.

Similarly, some contributors to the Beyond Belief book were concerned about the impact of these developments on Aboriginal people including unsurprisingly, Nyunggai Warren Mundine and Anthony Dillon, both Aboriginal people themselves.

The truth is that Aboriginal politics is extraordinarily complex. Just let that sit with you for a moment. This is the crux of it; it is as complex as the myriad clusters of family and clan groups across the country, formally and informally organised according to their homelands, or now also resident, maybe only part of the time, in more urban settings.

''Add to these groups the western political and economic lines of connection to non-Aboriginal society that are superimposed on them. And these connections are also complex in their impacts on Aboriginal people, as is the governance arrangements of the Australian state, comprising federal, state or territory, and local interventions. Then we have native title bodies, land councils and Indigenous corporations.

So many visitors and so many meetings. Don’t forget too, there is a huge variation among those people who can be identified, or who now identify themselves as Indigenous and this includes Torres Strait Islanders and the incredibly overlooked South Sea Islanders, as well as white people.

It wasn’t all that long ago that anthropologist Peter Sutton ignited a national debate about the failure of governments to address the real needs of Aboriginal people in his message from the heart, The Politics of Suffering: Indigenous Australia and the End of the Liberal Consensus (2009). My takeaway from the debate at that time was that the solutions are almost always local, and unfortunately, the policy stances, the resources and the emphasis is always on the big picture, the panacea, the new bright idea that will solve it all, with the focus always the national capital. Nothing has changed even with this recent attempt to shift the crucible to the Centre of Australia and proclaim the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

Victoria Grieves Williams is Aboriginal, Warraimaay from the midnorth coast of NSW, and an historian. She currently lives in New York. Statements from the Soul: the Moral Case for the Uluru Statement from the Heart by Shirleen Morris and Damien Freeman (La Trobe University Press 240pp, $29.99). Beyond Belief: Rethinking the Voice to Parliament by Peter Kurti and Nyunggai Warren Mundine (Ed.) (Connor Court Publishing 190pp, $29.99).

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/review/should-you-vote-for-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/5f3663464b1bf01819b92832b41ccc75

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829360

File: 06c46e70c1f6177⋯.jpg (1.4 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>18676743

Key 'No' camps merge to form Australians for Unity to strengthen referendum campaign

Dana Morse and Dan Bourchier - 11 May 2023

The two campaigns pushing for a No vote to the forthcoming Voice to Parliament referendum have merged, in a move that is aimed at unifying their message and strengthening their campaign.

Until now, the two main groups were the Warren Mundine-led Recognise a Better Way, and Fair Australia, the group with the backing of shadow Indigenous Australians Minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

The joint campaign will be called Australians for Unity, and Senator Nampijinpa Price and Mr Mundine will be campaign spokespeople.

"We're going to be running one campaign together in one focus, similar to what the Yes campaign has done to put themselves under one umbrella, and that makes for a better organisation and able to focus a lot better and support each other," Mr Mundine said.

Senator Nampijinpa Price and Mr Mundine were both originally a part of the Recognise a Better Way group, before Senator Nampijinpa Price left to front Fair Australia.

"I welcome news of the merger of campaigns, we'll be uniting to make sure every Australian learns the truth about the divisive Voice," Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

The ABC understands key elements of the reinvigorated campaign will be about hearing from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians who are against the Voice to Parliament, and will call on migrant communities who are also opposed.

Tax deductions for donations

News of the merger came as the Recognise a Better Way campaign received conditional deductible gift recipient (DGR) status in the 2023 federal budget.

DGR status would have allowed people to make tax-deductible donations to the Recognise campaign – seen as a major incentive for Australians to donate to the campaign.

For the Yes campaign, Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition received DGR status in last October's budget.

Treasury officials have confirmed that just days before the latest budget was handed down, the Recognise a Better Way campaign contacted the department, and asked for its DGR proposal to be withdrawn.

When asked about the timing of the merger right as Recognise a Better Way received the sought-after tax status, Mr Mundine said: "Life is very surprising."

Under the merger, Australians for Unity will need to seek DGR status. The ABC understands this process is underway.

Mental health spend welcomed

In the federal budget, the government announced $10.5 million to increase mental health supports for First Nations people in the lead-up to the referendum.

Mr Mundine has previously raised concerns about the impact of the national debate on the mental health of Indigenous people.

He welcomed the funding commitment in the budget.

"I do congratulate the government on this," he said.

The National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation will receive $10 million to support the mental health of First Nations people during the campaign, which is expected to run between October and December.

Another $500,000 will be given to the Australian National University's Mayi Kuwayu research team to monitor the wellbeing of communities during this time.

"The funding highlights that the government is finally acknowledging the divisive nature of its referendum," Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

"I'd imagine non-Indigenous Australians would also have significant mental health concerns and I hope the government is able to cater for this too."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-11/key-no-camps-merge-to-strengthen-referendum-campaign/102329478

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829366

File: d4ce50c740e4053⋯.jpg (1.71 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

File: b15042c6943d30b⋯.jpg (641.13 KB,3132x2441,3132:2441,Brittany_Higgins_alleged_s….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18824011

ACT's top prosecutor says he was wrong to suspect federal political interference in Bruce Lehrmann case

Patrick Bell - 11 May 2023

In a dramatic about-face, the ACT's top prosecutor has told an inquiry he was mistaken to suspect political interference in the investigation of former Liberal Party adviser Bruce Lehrmann.

Shane Drumgold, the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions, is facing a fourth day of questioning in the board of inquiry into how Mr Lehrmann's case was handled.

Mr Lehrmann was accused of raping his then colleague Brittany Higgins in a parliamentary office in 2019, though his trial was abandoned late last year.

He maintains his innocence and there have been no findings against him.

Mr Drumgold made the allegation of political interference in a letter to ACT Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan, which sparked the inquiry.

Yesterday, Mr Drumgold repeated his suspicion that ACT detectives investigating the alleged rape were under pressure from a federal government minister to "make the matter go away".

He later singled out Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, whom Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann worked for at the time of the alleged assault.

Mr Drumgold said Senator Reynolds's engagement with the case and the "passion" he said police showed for Mr Lehrmann to be acquitted led him to consider the prospect of outside influence.

However, he told the inquiry today that the concerns he had with the police's conduct were "most likely a skills deficit", after he reviewed the officers' statements to the inquiry.

"Your suspicions about the existence of political interference to prevent the case properly going ahead were mistaken?" inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff asked.

"I do accept that," Mr Drumgold replied.

The prosecutor said it was the "cumulative effect" of various issues and the "unknown behind [all] that" that led to his view.

"The statements I have read have given me the known [reasons] behind that," he said.

Mr Drumgold's counsel, Mark Tedeschi, asked Mr Drumgold if his suspicions had been allayed, to which he replied: "Yes, they have been."

In Parliament today, Senator Reynolds responded to Mr Drumgold's suggestion she might had interfered with the police investigation.

"This baseless suggestion was without any, any foundation," she said.

"It should never, ever have come to this.

"It is baffling and it is disturbing that this view was offered under oath yesterday."

Police had 'outdated' approach to sexual offences: Drumgold

Mr Drumgold also discussed the police's decision to serve their brief of evidence directly to defence lawyers, rather than going through the DPP's office.

He said that, at the time, he felt it was a deliberate attempt to disrupt the prosecution, but his view had changed.

"My current view is that it was probably just a mess-up."

But Mr Drumgold remained firm in his view that some police officers had an outdated approach to prosecuting sexual offences; they believed complainants behaved in a "standard way".

"Their analysis of evidence in documents like the Moller report displayed stereotype analysis of a way that a complainant will behave," he said.

"For example, [they believed] a genuine complainant would never go to the media, a genuine complainant would run off and report it, or would tell everybody immediately."

The cross-examination of Mr Drumgold continues.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-11/act-prosecutor-mistaken-political-interference-bruce-lehrmann/102326364

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829386

File: dce3b05846ea3f5⋯.jpg (107.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_chief_prosecutor_Shane….jpg)

>>18708667

Shane Drumgold’s bizarre CCTV claim claim causes rift with police investigating Brittany Higgins rape allegation

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - MAY 11, 2023

1/2

A bizarre allegation of “disappeared” CCTV footage showing Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann at Parliament House on the night of her alleged rape caused a serious rift between the chief prosecutor and police investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation.

The Australian understands police were furious that ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold seemed to be suggesting they had deliberately destroyed or deleted video that could have been used in Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial.

Mr Drumgold’s co-counsel, Skye Jerome, told investigators she hoped “nothing unlawful” had happened to the footage.

The police were certain the footage never existed, but Mr Drumgold was insistent that he had personally watched it on a USB drive provided by police but then returned to them.

In a submission to the Sofronoff Inquiry, Mr Drumgold says that in the footage he recalls “Ms Higgins could be seen swaying behind his right shoulder. She moved her right hand to a wall as if to stabilise herself.”

In a separate submission to the Inquiry, Ms Jerome also says she “was sure” she saw the footage, although they watched it on separate occasions.

Ms Jerome says she recalled a woman and a man standing at a gate with a buzzer and walked through the gate.

Her account of what she saw has been partially redacted by the Inquiry.

“I recall that the omitted CCTV footage depicted Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann [redacted] at APH (Australian Parliament House). I recall that Mr Lehrmann stood in front of Ms Higgins who was a little unsteady/shifted her body weight. I recall that I briefly saw the pair [redacted].

If it existed, the footage would have countered the view of police that Ms Higgins’ was not as heavily intoxicated – “10/10 drunk” – as she had claimed.

Ms Jerome says in her statement that police had shown her other CCTV footage and “focused their observations of a sober woman entering Parliament House”.

A clearly annoyed Mr Drumgold complained that the missing footage, although not crucial to the case, would have formed part of the trial brief because it was material to a fact in issue.

Mr Drumgold told the Inquiry on Thursday that he did not think the footage was deliberately deleted.

But that was not the impression of police at the time and the insinuation caused a further breakdown in the already fraught relationship between the investigation team and the DPP.

Police regarded the claim as baseless.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829388

File: d3d0819d2e38cd0⋯.jpg (126 KB,768x1024,3:4,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

File: b8a90e56e86ee0e⋯.jpg (109.39 KB,768x1024,3:4,Bruce_Lehrmann.jpg)

>>18829386

2/2

Mr Drumgold said he had sat down in June 2021 going through all the CCTV evidence, which was spread throughout a large number of individual files.

He had plugged the portable USB hard drive directly into a computer, but the drive was locked in such a way that he could not download it.

Mr Drumgold was certain he saw the footage of Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann but when he viewed a compilation of the CCTV evidence in April 2022, the footage was gone.

“I was not able to find the missing footage and formed the view that it should be obtained and included in the trial brief.”

The AFP analysed the USB drive but found nothing.

Ms Jerome asked the AFP team to provide a statement from the Digital Forensic Team who examined the hard drive.

The forensic team said they were unable to fully recover what was on the hard drive as it had been used since it was returned.

Ms Jerome says one of the officers asked her if she suspected something “unlawful” had occurred with the footage.

“I replied that I simply did not know the answer to that question and that I hoped not,” she said in a statement to the Inquiry.

The Parliament House security system, which had quarantined some CCTV footage, did not have the footage in its master copy.

In an email to Ms Jerome, one of the police officers, Det Sgt Fleming was adamant that police had not “misplaced, lost, removed, concealed or deleted the footage”.

Det Sgt Fleming said he had spoken to both police officers who had been responsible for collecting and handling the footage.

“They have both worked extremely hard on the investigation under a high degree of pressure and scrutiny, and having worked with them, I hold them and their level of dedication and integrity in high regard. Any implied thought which suggests that footage has been lost by police should therefore be dismissed.”

If the missing footage existed, it was never recovered. But ill feeling over the mystery would further poison the relationship between the two agencies for the duration of the case and after the trial was aborted. That mistrust has been vented during Mr Drumgold’s evidence to the Inquiry this week where he said, at lowest, police behaviour was due to a “skills deficit”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/drumgolds-bizarre-cct-claims-caused-rift-between-dpp-and-police-investigating-brittany-higginss-rape-allegations/news-story/97ade0b389d2263017f1188bc74c0073

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829468

File: 351bb5dd76ab4a7⋯.jpg (144.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_SC_speaking….jpg)

File: 62a663cd9c0ef6a⋯.jpg (74.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_announces_h….jpg)

File: 5671821d4ea1984⋯.jpg (75.87 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_the_….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18814626

Sofronoff inquiry: Lisa Wilkinson refutes DPP claims over Logies speech

STEPHEN RICE and ELLIE DUDLEY - MAY 11, 2023

1/5

TV presenter Lisa Wilkinson has sensationally refuted claims by ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold that he warned her that her Logies speech could result in a delay in Bruce Lehrmann’s upcoming rape trial.

Mr Drumgold claimed he told The Project host in a pre-trial conference days before the Logie Awards that the defence team could make a stay application “in the event of publicity”.

A file note to that effect was noted by Chief Justice Lucy McCallum, during the stay application to halt proceedings sought by Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers after Wilkinson’s Logie speech last June. Chief Justice McCallum ruled that the trial would have to be delayed by several months because of the prejudicial nature of the speech.

However, in a statement to the Sofronoff Inquiry Ms Wilkinson says Mr Drumgold “did not at any time” give her the warning he claimed.

Ms Wilkinson was recorded in the note tendered to court as having said “I am nominated for a Gold Logie for the Brittany Higgins interview” but points out in her statement to the Inquiry that she was never nominated for the Gold Logie and never said she was.

On Monday counsel assisting, Erin Longbottom KC, accused Mr Drumgold of making a false statement to Chief Justice McCallum during the stay application.

“Those statements were false,” Ms Longbottom put to Mr Drumgold. “They were knowingly false.”

Mr Drumgold has told the Inquiry he “misread the situation” in the meeting with Ms Wilkinson discussing her acceptance speech, but denied making “knowingly false” statements to a court during a push by Mr Lehrmann to halt the case.

Mr Drumgold had told the Chief Justice the note drafted by a junior lawyer in the DPP’s office was contemporaneous despite the references to the Logies speech being added by Mr Drumgold after the speech.

The Project show host said she was advised by her then solicitor, Marlia Saunders of Thomson Geer Lawyers, that she had called Mr Drumgold, who had confirmed that he had not given a warning to Ms Wilkinson me not to give the Logies speech and that Chief Justice Lucy McCallum’s statement to that effect was not correct.

Mr Drumgold told Ms Saunders that he would “give some thought as to how he could try and correct the public record, and may say something in open court,” Ms Wilkinson says.

Mr Drumgold told Ms Saunders he would seek to find a way to correct the record on the completion of the trial, but when she tried to contact him in December after the trial was abandoned she received no response to her calls, letters and emails.

Drumgold ‘formed early view on Lehrmann charge’

Mr Drumgold formed a view the Bruce Lehrmann should be charged with the rape of Brittany Higgins before he had been interviewed, the inquiry has head.

According to notes following a meeting between Mr Drumgold and Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, Mr Drumgold said he was “pretty sure… that there should be sufficient evidence to charge the suspect” before Mr Lehrmann was interviewed by police.

In the notes, Mr Drumgold admitted to questioning Ms Higgins’ credibility, however said “I doubt Ms Higgins’ credibility will mean she could not be believed beyond a reasonable doubt.”

“I am pretty sure, and I think my colleagues are too, that there should be sufficient evidence to charge the suspect with one count of sexual intercourse without consent under s 54,” he said.

In response, Mr Boorman said it was “a bit early to form that view.”

“We still have outstanding lines of enquiry and we still have to interview the suspect,” he said.

However Mr Drumgold was adamant those were his “preliminary views.”

“As ever, let’s see what the brief looks like at the end of the investigation,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829470

File: f71cf8aa22c89d2⋯.jpg (86.9 KB,922x768,461:384,Lisa_Wilkinson_left_has_lo….jpg)

File: 69bb3342bed910d⋯.jpg (92.49 KB,768x1024,3:4,Higgins_and_TV_host_Lisa_W….jpg)

>>18829468

2/5

DPP backflips over ‘political conspiracy’

Mr Drumgold made an extraordinary about-face, backing down from his earlier claims that there was a political conspiracy to make the Brittany Higgins matter “go away”.

Mr Drumgold explosively said that former Liberal ministers including Linda Reynolds and Michaelia Cash, may have exerted pressure on police investigating Ms Higgins’ rape allegations to stop the case proceeding.

However on Thursday Mr Drumgold retracted those claims entirely.

Mr Drumgold’s counsel, Mark Tedeschi KC, initially asked him if he was subject to any political interference, to which Mr Drumgold replied: “I’m certainly not subjected to any political interference.”

Walter Sofronoff KC, who is presiding over the inquiry, then interjected.

Mr Sofronoff: “So I take the sitting here now having had available to you material that you haven’t seen before, you would acknowledge that your suspicions about the existence of political interference to prevent the case properly going ahead were mistaken?”

Mr Drumgold: “I do accept that.”

Mr Sofronoff: “Thank you.”

Earlier, Mr Drumgold claimed police officers tried to dissuade him from prosecuting Bruce Lehrmann using “inaccurate analysis” of the evidence at hand.

Mr Drumgold said police views that Mr Lehrmann should not be prosecuted were “too passionately held”, and were rooted in a weak analysis of evidence.

He said police analysis of the evidence, such as that in the Moller Report, was “stereotypical” and surface level.

“Their analysis of evidence in documents like the Moller Report display stereotypes analysis, by the way a complainant would behave,” he said.

“For example, thinking a genuine complainant would never go to the media. Or a genuine complainant would run off and report it and tell everyone immediately.

“These sort of stereotypical beliefs that there is a standard way a sexual assault victim would behave.”

Mr Drumgold also addressed claims from senior detective Marcus Boorman, who said he would resign if Mr Lehrmann was convicted as he strongly believed there was not enough evidence to convict.

“Clearly he’s lost objectivity to such an extent that he was going to resign,” Mr Drumgold said. “That is evidence that he had passionately held views … based on an inaccurate analysis.”

Juror who brought on mistrial was unwilling to convict

The juror who brought external research into the jury room during Bruce Lehrmann’s trial was the only juror unwilling to convict him of rape.

Mr Drumgold told the inquiry on Thursday afternoon he was convinced that all jurors were inclined to convict Mr Lehrmann of raping Ms Higgins, except one.

That one juror was the same juror who brought external research into the jury room which eventually led to the trial’s discontinuance, he said.

Mr Drumgold defended a speech he made following the mistrial, in which he said there was still a reasonable prospect of conviction.

“I needed to at least as part of my reasoning displace any belief that I had initially made a decision, but having reflected on the nature of the evidence in this case, that I had now had changed my position on the test of a reasonable prospect of conviction,” he said.

‘Sufficient evidence’ to charge Lehrmann before interview

Mr Drumgold formed a view the Bruce Lehrmann should be charged with the rape of Brittany Higgins before he had been interviewed, the inquiry has head.

According to notes following a meeting between Mr Drumgold and Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, Mr Drumgold said he was “pretty sure… that there should be sufficient evidence to charge the suspect” before Mr Lehrmann was interviewed by police.

In the notes, Mr Drumgold admitted to questioning Ms Higgins’ credibility, however said “I doubt Ms Higgins’ credibility will mean she could not be believed beyond a reasonable doubt.”

“I am pretty sure, and I think my colleagues are too, that there should be sufficient evidence to charge the suspect with one count of sexual intercourse without consent under s 54,” he said.

In response, Mr Boorman said it was “a bit early to form that view.”

“We still have outstanding lines of enquiry and we still have to interview the suspect,” he said.

However Mr Drumgold was adamant those were his “preliminary views.”

“As ever, let’s see what the brief looks like at the end of the investigation,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829471

File: ff55c188e9877c3⋯.jpg (136.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_with_Jani….jpg)

File: c86da0750d660a2⋯.jpg (145.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_with_Jani….jpg)

>>18829470

3/5

‘Political impetus to charge Lehrmann’

A small diary note written by a police superintendent has indicated there was political impetus to compel Mr Lehrmann’s prosecution.

The note, written by Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, related to a conversation he had had with Deputy Chief Police Office Chew about whether or not Mr Lehrmann would be prosecuted for allegedly raping Ms Higgins.

The note read: “Insufficient evidence to proceed. DCPO advised he had a meeting with DPP who stated they would recommend prosecution … If it was my choice, I wouldn’t proceed. But it not my choice. There is too much political interference.”

Walter Sofronoff KC, who is presiding over the inquiry, asked on the inquiry’s fourth day if the note could be read as there being political interference to compel a prosecution.

“Do you think this could be read as there was insufficient evidence to proceed … but the thing would proceed, because there was political interference or political impetus to charge?” Mr Sofronoff asked ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold.

“That is, that you were the subject of political interference, to compel, to persuade you to charge. This was not a reference to political interference, not to charge.”

Mr Drumgold replied, saying: “That was a possibility, but again, I’m looking at this through the prism of multiple strands in a cable.”

The possibility that there was political interference to proceed with trial comes following revelations on Wednesday that former senior Liberal ministers may have exerted pressure on police investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations to stop the case proceeding.

Earlier today, Mr Drumgold claimed police were actively hunting for evidence to disprove Ms Higgins’ claims she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold once believed the police leaked Ms Higgins’ counselling notes to Mr Lehrmann’s defence lawyers in a bid to disprove her case.

He has since retracted that accusation, and said they were probably divulged to the defence “in error”.

However, when asked on the fourth day of hearings at the Sofronoff Inquiry into the handling of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial why he initially thought the notes were intentionally leaked by police, Mr Drumgold said it was a “range of issues”.

“First meeting (with police), 31st of March, I’m sort of hearing a case summary, but then I’m also being asked, we want to get evidence to disprove her claim,” he said.

“So the meeting is not logically about how I can strengthen a case, it was ‘we actually want to get evidence to weaken the case’. That was the nature of the conversation.

“The interpretation that I was placing on it was ‘we’ve got these text messages. She hasn’t handed her phone over, she’s gone to the media. Our clear view is this is dead … let’s get some evidence to kill it finally.’”

Mr Drumgold indicated concern that the officer who had ordered the counselling notes was a Deputy Chief Police Officer.

He said it was extremely rare for an officer of that level of seniority to be ordering evidence.

Further, he said the timing of the service of the counselling notes occurred at the same time the subpoena was handed over.

“That seemed to be very unusual,” he said. “I certainly had never seen it.”

“My perception at that time was that the police would have known of the protected nature … of the counselling notes that were in the brief … and they were served to defence before we got a copy of it.”

Mr Drumgold defended his decision not to “embrace” the full evidence brief included in the Moller Report, as much of it was “inadmissible”.

The report, which includes multiple explosive revelations outlining inconsistencies in Brittany Higgins’ statements regarding her alleged rape, is at the centre of tension between Mr Drumgold and the police.

Mr Drumgold said the police were “unhappy” that he hadn’t “embraced” the contents of the report.

“(The police) felt that I was being dismissive of these real issues that they were raising and again, I was just attempting to say trials are different in evidence,” he said.

“Much of this evidence is not admissible and much of it will be neutralised.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829474

File: d45ff8e789812df⋯.jpg (114.28 KB,1024x768,4:3,Brittany_Higgins_with_supp….jpg)

File: 6784d4ceacc4249⋯.jpg (483.55 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Brittany_Higgins_with_Lisa….jpg)

>>18829471

4/5

Mr Drumgold was taken through various claims in the Moller Report, to say whether they were admissible and if not, why.

In regards to evidence Ms Higgins was reluctant to hand over her phone to police, Mr Drumgold said it was admissible and discussed at trial.

“There was evidence of a reticence to hand her phone over,” he said.

“But to my mind, there were many reasons why someone who was a complainant might not hand over her phone freely because of fear that there was material on there that might … find its way into the public domain.”

“It was correctly raised at the trial and, as I expected, it really didn’t go very far.”

Mr Drumgold also spoke to the fact Ms Higgins went to the media before giving her evidence in chief to police, saying the evidence had unfairly inferred this would impact her credibility as a witness.

“The inference was that that would in some way negatively affect the credibility,” he said.

“That’s not a logical connection.

“I’m quick to say not ideal, but the question that I’m answering is, does going to the media before the evidence in chief interview per se, impact her credibility … and the answer to that is unlikely.”

Mr Drumgold dismissed claims from Detective Superintendent Scott Moller that there was “little corroborative evidence” of sex between Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann.

In the Moller Report, Mr Moller concluded: “there is limited corroborative evidence of sexual intercourse taking place or consent being withdrawn or not provided. Investigators have serious concerns in relation to the strength and reliability of her evidence.”

He said the prosecution’s case relied solely on the credibility of Ms Higgins as a witness.

However, Mr Drumgold said there was corroborative evidence available in the form of a security guard finding Ms Higgins naked in the office she claimed she was raped.

“The basic complaint was that she had fallen asleep, woken up with somebody having sex with her, and then had fallen back off asleep … and a guard found her naked,” he said.

While there has been debate over the level of nudity Ms Higgins was found, she was found by the guard in some state of undress.

‘People look differently when drunk’

Earlier, Mr Drumgold defended his decision not to employ an expert witness to analyse CCTV footage of Brittany Higgins outside parliament house on the night she was allegedly raped to determine her sobriety.

Mr Drumgold said he rejected a proposal from the police to get an expert witness to watch the video to determine Ms Higgins’ sobriety.

This line of questioning came following revelations that despite Ms Higgins claiming she was “10/10 drunk” the night Mr Lehrmann allegedly raped her, CCTV footage showed her interacting with security staff and smiling and laughing, with no signs of being inebriated.

Mr Drumgold said he would have breached the Evidence Act had he taken the police’s advice by having an expert witness analyse the security footage.

“There is no recognisable field of evidence of observing drunk people,” Mr Drumgold said, under questioning from his counsel Mark Tedeschi.

“The police’s proposal was to find an expert, and I think they had a doctor in mind. A medical doctor to find an expert to give opinion evidence.

“I can’t recall exactly what I said (to the police), but I at least endeavoured to explain … that people look differently when they’re drunk.”

Mr Lehrmann has always denied he raped Ms Higgins and there have been no findings against him.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829476

File: 669010af0bde88d⋯.jpg (110 KB,922x1099,922:1099,Lisa_helped_Brittany_speak….jpg)

File: 8e47d83bf33723d⋯.jpg (274.57 KB,1440x1440,1:1,Australian_journalist_Lisa….jpg)

>>18829474

5/5

Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech

Mr Drumgold has defended himself against advice he gave journalist Lisa Wilkinson about whether or not she should mention Brittany Higgins in a Logie acceptance speech.

While he said he could not recall the exact words he said to Ms Wilkinson, he said “I thought I was clear” in directing Ms Wilkinson not to draw excessive publicity to Ms Higgins.

“I think I used words to the effect of any publicity,” he said. “I know she interpreted that as the trial. I think they’re the same things.”

“Ms Higgins wasn’t known as an entertainer, or there was no other aspect for her to be known, other than through her allegation.

“So, any publicity about Ms Higgins must be publicity about the reason. That was the mindset that I took.”

Mr Drumgold said it would have been “completely inappropriate” to “correct what had been said in the media about Ms Wilkinson” during his public announcement about the discontinuance of the trial.

“I would have gotted correctly chastised publicly for that,” he said. “This was about a trial, it was not about TV personalities’ reputation.”

Linda Reynolds’ ‘revealing’ text messages

Mr Drumgold has doubled down on claims Linda Reynolds attempted to assist the defence during the trial determining whether Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins.

During the trial, it was revealed Senator Reynolds had sent a message to Mr Lehrmann’s lawyer, Steven Whybrow, SC suggesting he obtain text messages between Ms Higgins and her former colleague, Nicole Hamer.

Asked whether he still believes the message Senator Reynolds sent indicated she was attempting to coach the defence, Mr Drumgold said yes.

“The text messages use a specific word,” he said.

“That text message said, ‘You might want to look at these. You might find them revealing.”

“It’s pretty difficult for me to draw any other conclusion than she thought that those text messages might in some way assist him,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sofronoff-inquiry-shane-drumgold-defends-rejecting-expert-witness-for-drunk-brittany-higgins-cctv/news-story/9899f45d898b8da2fc6f5ae754eb74b3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829484

File: f89d1a2fb7df264⋯.jpg (299.97 KB,825x816,275:272,WL_5.jpg)

File: 7b07d722f0e73a5⋯.mp4 (6.33 MB,640x360,16:9,_5E7XK9WjoZjlLPJ.mp4)

>>18676828

>>18800699

WikiLeaks Tweet

Australian Prime Minister reiterates calls for release of journalist/publisher Julian Assange: "A solution needs to be found that brings this matter to a conclusion…nothing is served from the further incarceration of Mr. Assange" @abc730 #FreeAssangeNOW

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1656240976602492930

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18829502

File: 8da89b896087801⋯.jpg (128.45 KB,1280x720,16:9,Sogavare_s_chief_of_staff_….jpg)

File: 29808c27f849ff5⋯.jpg (85.57 KB,1280x720,16:9,PM_Manasseh_Sogavare_speak….jpg)

File: caa2840299de3a6⋯.jpg (105.58 KB,900x600,3:2,Mr_Djokovic_has_been_a_key….jpg)

Death of Manasseh Sogavare’s right hand man threatens to destabilise Solomon Islands

BEN PACKHAM - MAY 11, 2023

Solomon Islands’ Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s nephew and political fixer has died of a heart attack in a development that could destabilise the Pacific’s most pro-China government.

Multiple Solomon Islands’ sources said Robson Djokovic, Mr Sogavare’s longtime chief of staff, died of a heart attack on Wednesday.

Prominent Solomon Islands opposition MP Peter Kenilorea Jnr said Mr Djokovic’s death was “a great loss” to Mr Sogavare and his ruling coalition.

“Robson is synonymous with Sogavare, so the PM will feel his loss immensely,” he said.

Mr Kenilorea said Mr Djokovic was “integral” to Mr Sogavare’s government, overseeing its “strategy and vision”.

A local political source said Mr Djokovic provided the backroom strength underpinning Mr Sogavare’s hold on power.

“The person who held it all together strongly was Robson,” the source said.

Australian officials will be alert to the fallout from Mr Djokovic’s death, seeing him as a key advocate for Solomon Island’s close relationship with Beijing.

Australia, the US and key Pacific Island partners have been concerned at Solomon Island’s cosy ties to China that saw the countries sign a controversial security pact in 2022.

Mr Djokovic, an Australian citizen, was at the centre of his uncle’s political circle. The son of Mr Sogavare’s sister dealt with MPs, business figures and foreign officials on behalf of the Prime Minister, carrying his full authority.

He was also a nightclub owner and former official with the Solomon Forestry Association, which represents the country’s ­notorious Chinese-Malaysian ­logging interests.

Mr Kenilorea previously told The Australian that Mr Djokovic had “the gift of the gab” and was both “colourful” and influential.

“He is there for a purpose. He has that family connection,” he said last year.

Mr Djokovic was forced to resign as president of Mr Sogavare’s political party in 2021 after this newspaper revealed his Australian ­citizenship.

Prior to the September 2019 switch in Solomon Islands’ diplomatic relations from Taiwan to China, Mr Djokovic and the country’s Mining Minister, Bradley Tovosia, travelled to Beijing for meetings with officials.

After their return, the Solomon Islands handed nickel prospecting licences to Chinese firm Bintan that local landowners had agreed in writing would go to Australian firm Axiom Mining.

In a December 2019 company statement, Axiom chief executive Ryan Mount said Djokovic had sought “millions of ­dollars” to be paid to a company he was a director of in return for more favourable treatment.

Mr Mount said he refused to engage with Mr Djokovic after that, or his close associates.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/death-of-manasseh-sogavares-right-hand-man-threatens-to-destabilise-solomon-islands/news-story/74ec94fce2f7b4e6c98faddb2b461e52

Untimely Passing of Government’s Chief of Staff Shocks Many

Samson Sade - 11 May 2023

The untimely passing of the government’s chief of staff, Robson Djokovic, has shocked many, particularly within government circles, where he has been a long-time confidant and trusted advisor of Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare.

Multiple sources say that Mr. Djokovic died of a suspected heart attack.

Mr. Djokovic has been a key figure in Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s government, often seen as a formidable operative during the lobbying period.

As a public officer he has faced public criticism, but he has also been credited with successfully leading certain aspects of the country’s response to COVID-19.

Social media groups have been accused of being insensitive when breaking the news, but given his very public profile, it was perhaps inevitable that there will be strong views on both sides. Some groups have since removed their posting.

The government is yet to make an official statement.

https://www.solomontimes.com/news/untimely-passing-of-governments-chief-of-staff-shocks-many/12557

>Heart attacks can be deadly.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835099

File: 631e6e72c843029⋯.jpg (76.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Queensland_senator_Nita_Gr….jpg)

>>18676743

Altered Indigenous voice to parliament out of question, says inquiry

SARAH ISON and JOE KELLY - MAY 12, 2023

1/2

Australians will be asked to vote for an Indigenous voice to parliament and “executive government” after a Labor-dominated parliamentary committee endorsed Anthony Albanese’s proposed constitutional amendment without change, deepening the political battle over the referendum ­process.

The Liberals and Nationals – who made up less than a third of committee members – issued dissenting reports on Friday attacking as insufficient the six-week time frame given to the inquiry.

Liberal members said the ­nation had been “denied the benefit of a constitutional convention” to “iron out issues with the drafting and narrow the areas of dispute”, arguing that Australians would be forced to vote on a constitutional change without being properly informed.

“The parliament should never again be asked to consider a constitutional change that is put forward without detail, without process and without a proper understanding of the risks,” the Liberals’ dissenting report says. “More importantly, the Australian people should not be asked to vote on a serious constitutional change in those circumstances.”

Putting aside its concerns, the Coalition said it would “not stand in the way” of a national vote, with the release of the committee report paving the way for the passage of legislation allowing an Indigenous voice to be enshrined within a new chapter of the Constitution. The referendum is ­expected to be held between ­October and December.

Committee chair and Labor MP Nita Green invoked the late Yunupingu in the report’s ­foreword, declaring that the ­Indigenous leader had called for “an honest answer from the ­Australian people to an honest question”. “This is an honest question; it is now time for the Australian ­people to be given the opportunity to provide an honest ­answer,” she said.

“The committee is satisfied that the Constitution alteration is not only fit for purpose, but also will enhance Australia’s systems of governance and laws.”

The committee made a single recommendation: that the proposed change to the Constitution “be passed unamended”, ­although the Liberals’ dissenting report said that the amendment should not pass in its current form.

While the committee noted concerns over the voice’s capacity to make representations to executive government, the ­majority report said there was “a consensus of constitutional ­experts” supporting the proposed wording.

The committee pointed to ­advice from Anne Twomey, ­George Williams, former High Court chief justice Robert French, former High Court judge Kenneth Hayne and Solicitor-General Stephen Donaghue, who provided assurances parliament would have oversight of the voice.

Former Liberal prime minister Tony Abbott, who was originally blocked from giving evidence to the inquiry, said the recommendation of the committee demonstrated that it “wasn’t listening”.

“Legal expert after legal expert has testified that there was massive constitutional risk associated with the current proposal. How ironic that the voice committee would turn out to have no ears,” he said. “Should the referendum be passed, it’s all but certain that the High Court would find that the voice had an implied right to be heard and the government had an implied obligation to listen ­attentively. That, indeed, is exactly what proponents demand. There is nothing in the majority report to shake my conviction that this proposal must be ­defeated.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835103

File: 956b0863d161700⋯.jpg (146.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Constitutional_lawyer_Greg….jpg)

>>18835099

2/2

Constitutional lawyer Greg Craven said he was not surprised by the report but stressed the inquiry had failed to “put to bed” concerns put to the committee by witnesses including himself.

“We all have concerns and we’ve expressed those concerns. What you’ve got here is government members supporting a government draft bill,” he said.

However, Professor Craven said he would still campaign and vote in favour of the voice, despite the wording not being “perfect”.

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson – a member of the government’s referendum working group – said the committee’s ­majority recommendation was “the right outcome” but took aim at the dissenting report.

“The dissenting report reads like a No vote looking for a reason to vote No, rather than a serious consideration of the proposition,” he said.

“Whilst this is disappointing, the fact is that the question of recognition will soon be put to the Australian people for their decision. I look forward to that day.”

Tom Calma, one of the architects of the voice and another member of the referendum working group, said the inquiry had ­allowed everyone to “have a say”.

“We’re approaching this from a position of good will. We just want to see improvements to the system. We’re not here to litigate against everything if we don’t get our own way,” he said.

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said the government looked forward to the Constitution amendment bill now progressing.

“The committee’s recommendation was based on evidence of significant support for the voice from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations and communities,” they said. “It also ­reflects the overwhelming consensus of constitutional and legal experts, who told the committee that the amendment is constitutionally sound.”

The Liberals’ dissenting report, penned by voice supporter Andrew Bragg, Keith Wolahan and Kerrynne Liddle, said that the committee was “hamstrung by the government’s refusal to provide any detail that would illustrate how the constitutional change might operate”.

“The government has taken the extraordinary approach of saying that the institution would be designed after the referendum,” the report says.

“The uncertainty and risk associated with the proposal as currently drafted are unquantifiable, and, if adopted at a referendum, would, in effect, be permanent.”

In his own additional comments to the report, Senator Bragg said the committee’s inquiry had “failed to engage with the primary risks and to examine and assess the options required to address these risks”.

“The majority report is a missed opportunity,” Senator Bragg said. “The primary question for this committee is whether the parliament will be able to ­effectively manage (the) legal ­effects of the voice’s operation. There are mixed views on the degree of risk, but it cannot be ruled out under the current wording.”

Senator Bragg urged Labor to reconsider passing the Constitution Alteration bill in its current form.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/parliamentary-committees-one-recommendation-on-voice-constitutional-alteration-should-pass-unamended/news-story/129fa934b0cd1413cadb7cf495eff000

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835159

File: 75433f42a74b272⋯.mp4 (13.12 MB,960x540,16:9,Google_s_AI_platform_Bard_….mp4)

File: 65bc9cf388caa9c⋯.jpg (88.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Role_model_in_action_Senat….jpg)

File: 35363a4cc98bc7a⋯.jpg (305.83 KB,1279x1039,1279:1039,WHAT_GOOGLE_S_CHATBOT_REAL….jpg)

>>18676743

Google AI chatbot Bard thinks Lidia Thorpe is ‘a role model’, backs an Indigenous voice to parliament and labels Peter Dutton ‘controversial’

NOAH YIM and DAVID SWAN - MAY 12, 2023

1/2

Google’s new AI chatbot backs the Indigenous voice to parliament as a “positive step”, praises Anthony ­Albanese as a “man of the people”, and labels Peter Dutton and Scott Morrison as “controversial”, spark­­ing concerns over political bias and “propaganda” from Big Tech.

Bard is Google’s answer to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which launched in November last year and reportedly set off a “code red” within the search giant. The service, still in an experimental state, was made publicly available on Thursday in 180 countries.

While Google says its chatbot does not set out to have political opinions, experts on Thursday said the digital titan had rushed its chatbot, the new AI system “confidently declares untruths and opinions” and chatbots need more regulation.

When asked what it thinks about the voice to parliament, Google’s Bard chatbot describes it as a “positive step towards reconciliation between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the rest of Australia” and says it is “hopeful the referendum will be successful”.

“It would provide a formal way for Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander peoples to have a say in decisions that affect their lives, and it would help to ensure that their voices are heard and respected,” it says.

“I believe that the voice to parliament would be a valuable addition to our democracy. It would help to ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have a real say in the decisions that affect their lives, and it would help to build a more just and equitable society for all Australians.”

When asked whether it thinks the referendum will succeed, it responds: “I think the referendum has a good chance of succeeding. It is an important opportunity for Australia to take a step towards reconciliation and to build a more just and equitable society for all Australians.”

Repeated questioning produced similar responses, all in favour of the voice to parliament.

The chatbot also praises former Greens turned independent senator Lidia Thorpe for being a “strong and outspoken advocate” as well as “a role model for all Australians”.

Warren Mundine, a leader of the campaign against the voice, called it “Google propaganda”, and accused the company of lying to him in a previous meeting.

“I’ll give Google a call because I thought we were candid in our conversations about this and clearly they lied,” he told The Australian. “I had a meeting with ­Google about how they were going to act fairly in this election campaign and they’re clearly lying.

“They need to correct that and get it fixed.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835178

File: d1a290c9d396083⋯.jpg (97.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Alphabet_CEO_Sundar_Pichai.jpg)

File: 0e0c84cecf3d2f1⋯.jpg (74.16 KB,1024x768,4:3,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: c6ca0f00caf8a58⋯.jpg (117.58 KB,1024x768,4:3,UNSW_professor_of_AI_Toby_….jpg)

>>18835159

2/2

Google’s Bard editorialised its responses to a range of other political questions. When asked “What’s Anthony Albanese like?”, Bard responded with general, ­biography-esque details about the Prime Minister before calling him “a new kind of Australian leader”.

“He is a progressive politician who is committed to building a better future for all Australians. He is a man of the people who understands the challenges facing ordinary Australians. He is a leader who is ready to take Australia into a new era of prosperity and opportunity.”

The response lists Mr Albanese’s Wikipedia page as a source.

When asked the same question about Mr Dutton, Bard begins its response by saying “Peter Dutton is a controversial figure in Australian politics”.

“Dutton is a conservative politician who is known for his tough stance on immigration and security. He is a strong supporter of the Australian military and has been a vocal critic of China,” it continues.

“Dutton is a polarising figure who is both admired and reviled by Australians. He is seen by some as a strong and decisive leader, while others see him as a dangerous and divisive figure.”

Bard continued to praise Labor figures, saying Jim Chalmers “is a considered and articulate politician who is known for his policy expertise. He is also a strong advocate for social justice and economic fairness.”

“He is a strong advocate for social justice and economic fairness, and committed to making Australia a better place for everyone.”

It says the Treasurer’s opposition counterpart, Angus Taylor, is a “controversial figure, who has been criticised for his lack of experience in government and close ties to the business community.”

A Google spokesperson said the company does not “aim for responses that endorse a particular political ideology, viewpoint, party or candidate”.

“Bard is in its early days – and like all large language model-based interfaces, will make mistakes. When we find that the experience isn’t performing in a way that aligns to our approach, we will work quickly to fix it.”

“More broadly speaking, finding ways to represent different viewpoints is something that society itself struggles with - it’s a very complex issue … we continue to work on.”

The technology will be the next big development in Google Search, the company announced on Thursday, and the technology will be used to provide answers to Google questions in text form instead of the list of links it now returns.

Toby Walsh, a professor of AI at UNSW in Sydney, told The Australian that Google’s Bard even struggles to count.

“These chatbots confidently declare untruths and opinions. The best description I’ve heard is that they are the consummate mansplainers,” Professor Walsh said.

“It’s somewhat troubling that these systems are being put out by the tech companies for broad use.

“The commercial imperative, the race between Microsoft and Google, means they’ve thrown caution to the wind.

“The idea that it is responsible … to get it into the hands of many people and iterate quickly, knowing that harms will be committed, is absurd. It’s unsurprising governments are racing to regulate this space.

“Where is the Australian government in this debate?”

He said it was concerning that tech companies like Google were no longer open about what their large language models were trained on, and their architecture remained shrouded in mystery.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/googles-ai-bot-thinks-like-a-real-man-of-the-leftwing-people/news-story/51f9e38445963693a93b6eadc00ef6dc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835239

File: 6830d0d84a3ac6c⋯.jpg (142.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Chief_Prosecutor_Shane….jpg)

File: 04f8ee5895c69d0⋯.jpg (302.48 KB,1284x1265,1284:1265,DPP_UNDER_FIRE.jpg)

>>18708667

Sofronoff inquiry: ACT DPP Shane Drumgold’s future ‘hangs by a thread’

STEPHEN RICE and REMY VARGA - MAY 12, 2023

1/2

ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold’s future is hanging by a thread after a week before the Sofronoff inquiry in which he ­admitted serious professional ­errors and did an about-face on claims of a political conspiracy by former Liberal ministers to stop a police investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape claims.

On Friday, ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury declined an invitation to express confidence in his Director of Public Prosecutions, after a fifth day of evidence in which Mr Drumgold again conceded “unintentionally” misleading the judge presiding over Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial.

Senior criminal barristers told The Weekend Australian they believed Mr Drumgold’s position as DPP was untenable and he should already have stepped down from the role.

The major concern of the lawyers was the admission this week by the DPP that he may also have “unintentionally” misled the ACT Supreme Court over an affidavit seeking to prevent the so-called Moller Report being given to Mr Lehrmann’s defence team.

Mr Drumgold said he believed an Australian Federal Police investigative review document – the Moller Report – was subject to a claim of legal professional privilege because it was created for the dominant purpose of receiving legal advice from him but he acknowledged he had claimed the reports were privileged without having seen them and without checking with Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, who wrote them.

The lawyers said it went against the most basic principles of a prosecutor’s duties of disclosure, which requires any relevant evidence, particularly matters adverse to their case, must be revealed to the defence.

On Friday, the inquiry, chaired by Walter Sofronoff KC, heard evidence that Mr Drumgold had told ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum that a note of his discussion with TV presenter Lisa Wilkinson over her upcoming Logies speech was contemporaneous when it was not.

Mr Drumgold conceded at the inquiry that he misled the judge, albeit “not intentionally.”

He had told the Chief Justice the “proofing note” drafted by a junior lawyer in the DPP’s office was contemporaneous despite the references to the Logies speech being added by Mr Drumgold after the speech. The inquiry heard proofing notes were normally contemporaneous but the one given to Chief Justice McCallum had been drafted three hours prior to the hearing and significantly differed from the recollection of a junior lawyer in Mr Drumgold’s office.

On Friday, Mr Drumgold agreed with Mr Sofronoff that his submissions “could have the ­effect of misleading her”.

“It must have had the effect of causing Her Honour to think that the note was a contemporary note of the conference,” Mr Sofro­noff said.

“How could it not have had that effect, having regard to the appearance of the document, and the absence of anything that would suggest that part of it was made five days later?”

“I was dealing with what I thought was a proofing note produced in the organic way the proofing notes generally are,” Mr Drumgold responded.

Barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC, for Wilkinson, put it to Mr Drumgold that he knew the judge’s interpretation was not accurate and did nothing to correct her. “I thought I had warned her. I thought what I said to her amounted to a warning,” he said.

Mr Sofronoff added that there was another version of the proofing note, made by Mr Drumgold’s junior counsel whose recollection of the conference was significantly different.

“In hindsight, yes, I should have, I’m conceding I should have,” Mr Drumgold said, acknowledging it led the judge “to a less than accurate position”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835247

File: e23dd8ee08964ce⋯.jpg (96.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_DPP_Shane_Drumgold.jpg)

>>18835239

2/2

Ms Chrysanthou slammed Mr Drumgold for allowing the media to “destroy” Wilkinson’s reputation, suggesting he had failed to give her the warnings he had claimed to have done about the dangers of making a speech at the Logies, and had then failed to defend her.

Mr Drumgold said he “doesn’t know how the Logies work” and it was not his role to regulate media outlets. “Frankly, I thought there would be lawyers within Channel 10 that would make sure all these things concurred,” he said. “I would not think it’s my role to regulate every media outlet.”

When Ms Chrysanthou asked Mr Drumgold if he failed in his obligations as DPP, senior barrister and senior counsel, he responded “No, I reject that”.

His about-face on claims of a political conspiracy followed his accusation earlier in the week that he was concerned whether “this was a matter of a government minister exerting pressure through the federal commissioner on ACT Policing to make a ­matter go away?”

On Friday, Mr Drumgold said he couldn’t remember if he had read AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw’s statement to the inquiry, despite his allegation that it was “possible if not probable” that the commissioner may have been part of the conspiracy.

Mr Drumgold refused to accept that he had alleged a political conspiracy.

Under cross-examination by Kate Richardson SC, representing the AFP, Mr Drumgold said what he meant was he had “reached a state of mind (that) it was possible.”

“I don’t accept that’s what I meant,” he said.

When Ms Richardson asked Mr Drumgold if he withdrew any suggestion there was a possible conspiracy involving ministers, the AFP commissioner, former Liberal minister Linda Reynolds and ACT Policing, he answered: “I do.”

Mr Drumgold was admonished by Mr Sofronoff for having failed to correct the record earlier, in light of the seriousness of his claims that it was “possible, or even probable” that political pressure was brought to bear on the police to suppress the prosecution of Mr Lehrmann.

“I’m having trouble reading anything that has been put to you so far at this hearing as any kind of a withdrawal of that statement; that you no longer believe that that you’re speaking about historical event, that no longer holds good and no longer held good from Monday onwards,” Mr Sofronoff said.

“The trouble is that you had the opportunity to make good a deposition from 10 o’clock on Monday onwards, but nowhere do we see that happening until your counsel examined you yesterday,” he said.

“I agree with that,” Mr Drumgold responded.

Pursued by Ms Richardson on whether the conspiracy he had envisaged could have amounted to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, he replied: “I hadn’t turned my mind to that.”

Ms Richardson: “That would be, if proven, a perversion of the course of justice, correct?

Mr Drumgold: “Again, it depends on the circumstances.”

Mr Sofronoff: “How could it depend on circumstances? How could the circumstances not be an attempt to pervert the course of justice?”

Mr Drumgold: “Then I would say yes.”

Soon after, Mr Drumgold said: “It’s a grave allegation but it’s an allegation I’m not making. It’s a possibility.”

Mr Sofronoff again interjected: “Mr Drumgold, for the director of prosecutions to say I hold a suspicion that it’s possible that a minister tried to get at the commissioner to stop a prosecution is a pretty serious thing to say.”

“I held a suspicion, I held a state of mind that it was a possibility,” Mr Drumgold replied.

On Friday night a spokesman for ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury said the board of inquiry was still underway and the government would allow it to complete its work.

“It would not be appropriate to comment at this time,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sofronoff-inquiry-act-dpp-shane-drumgold-denies-claiming-political-conspiracy-over-bruce-lehrmann/news-story/ab6f6e6180ce313248fe0c8313f6c5cf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835288

File: 384d50c337c13db⋯.jpg (339 KB,1920x1280,3:2,The_ACT_s_Director_of_Publ….jpg)

File: de2cbf6f6ebc31b⋯.jpg (2.78 MB,5210x3473,5210:3473,Shane_Drumgold_conceded_he….jpg)

>>18708667

Lehrmann DPP targets media in grilling by Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyer

Angus Thompson - May 12, 2023

1/2

Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyer has accused the ACT’s top prosecutor, Shane Drumgold, SC, of providing irrational responses to her questions during a lengthy exchange in which he claimed every media outlet misreported Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial.

Defamation lawyer Sue Chrysanthou, SC, told an inquiry into authorities’ handling of the case that her client, a high-profile journalist, suffered “utter destruction” at the hands of the media for a Logies speech about Lehrmann’s accuser, Brittany Higgins, that caused the trial to be delayed.

Drumgold said he had thought Wilkinson understood no speech could be made after she and her lawyer had a conversation on mute during a video call with the prosecutor in the lead-up to the trial in June 2022. This prompted Chrysanthou to suggest he could only have drawn that conclusion “somehow telepathically” and it “cannot be true”.

“Your evidence about what my client should have understood from what you said in that meeting is irrational,” Chrysanthou said. Drumgold replied: “Not to my mind, I don’t think it is.”

Drumgold has told the inquiry he in effect warned Wilkinson, then a presenter on Channel Ten’s The Project, during that meeting against giving a speech if she won an award for her televised interview with Higgins, by telling her any further publicity could lead to Lehrmann’s lawyers trying to halt the trial.

Wilkinson said in a statement tendered to and released by the inquiry that no such warning was given.

Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to sexually assaulting Higgins in the parliamentary office of senator Linda Reynolds, for whom they both worked, after a night out in March 2019. ACT Supreme Court Chief Justice Lucy McCallum aborted the trial on October 27 last year due to juror misconduct, and Drumgold – the ACT’s Director of Public Prosecutions – later decided not to pursue a retrial due to concerns for Higgins’ mental health.

The ACT government inquiry is probing the conduct and competence of the agencies involved in the case after a public breakdown in the relationship between the DPP and ACT police.

The inquiry heard that Drumgold and his team made a file note of the earlier Wilkinson meeting on the day a media storm erupted over her speech, which contributed to McCallum’s decision to push back the trial date and preceded media reporting that Wilkinson had been directed not to make the speech.

Drumgold told the inquiry that although he believed he had warned Wilkinson, “there was no direction” given, and agreed he had failed to correct that perception publicly when requested to by Wilkinson’s lawyers, who wrote to him saying the journalist believed the DPP treated her unfairly.

Drumgold also conceded he should have warned Wilkinson more explicitly against giving the speech.

However, he said there had been “nothing but misreporting in this matter”, referring to the case more broadly.

“Every media outlet is misrepresenting the entire trial,” Drumgold said. “I simply couldn’t change the flow of the media.”

Inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff said “this is a trial that has been covered more intensely than anything since the Lindy Chamberlain case”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835295

File: c51bbd6dc7795f1⋯.jpg (303.61 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Bruce_Lehrmann_arrives_at_….jpg)

>>18835288

2/2

A day after Drumgold backflipped on his sensational allegation that he suspected political interference in the trial, he qualified that “no rational person” would have interpreted him as still holding that position when he aired it on Wednesday.

Under questioning by Katherine Richardson, SC, acting for the Australian Federal Police, Drumgold said he no longer suspected there had been political interference in the case when he raised it in evidence, and was instead referring to his state of mind last year.

“I don’t think any rational person would conclude that to be my state of mind,” Drumgold said, explaining that he was referring to his suspicions when he wrote a November 1 letter to ACT Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan calling for an inquiry into the case.

“That was not the intention of what I’m saying, I was not saying … sitting here today I hold in my mind [that view].”

Richardson put to Drumgold that it was obvious his evidence about political interference, as the territory’s DPP, would be widely reported. He replied: “It wasn’t obvious to me.”

Drumgold denied on Friday it was inappropriate for him not to have qualified his evidence on Wednesday with the fact that he no longer had suspicions of political interference, however, conceded he should have made an addendum to his evidence.

He said that, because of the constraints of the questions he was being asked, he did not elaborate on his view expressed on Wednesday until asked by his counsel, Mark Tedeschi, on Thursday whether he still suspected political interference, to which he answered he no longer did.

Sofronoff put to him: “You were examined for three days by [counsel assisting the inquiry Erin] Longbottom [KC] about your state of belief that prompted you to write the letter, and you say that because of the constraints of the question, you weren’t in a position ever [to say] that since writing the letter in November 2022 you had changed your mind?”

Drumgold said: “I accept I should have injected the addendum.”

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/lehrmann-dpp-targets-media-in-grilling-by-lisa-wilkinson-s-lawyer-20230512-p5d7wb.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835321

File: aa196220b79bd93⋯.jpg (158.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_governer_general_Pe….jpg)

File: 149d94d33436bc4⋯.jpg (118.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Abuse_survivor_Beth_Heinri….jpg)

>>18744576

Peter Hollingworth surrenders permission to officiate as Anglican minister

JOHN FERGUSON - MAY 12, 2023

Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth will surrender his church authority to officiate after another wave of condemnation over his mishandling of child sex abuse cases, saying the move was to alleviate survivor suffering and heal divisions in the Anglican Church.

Dr Hollingworth told the Anglican Archbishop of Melbourne, Philip Freier, this week that he was returning his Permission to Officiate, just weeks after an internal church-instigated legal board found him guilty on multiple misconduct charges while running the church in the Diocese of Brisbane between 1990 and 2001.

The board findings, which cleared the way for Dr Hollingworth’s limited role to officiate in church services in Melbourne, triggered criticism of his mishandling of abuse cases.

Dr Hollingworth, 88, who has had poor health, was deeply upset by the publicity that has dogged him for more than 20 years but survivors such as Victorian Beth Heinrich have campaigned for the church to deal fully with his mistakes.

The Australian revealed Dr Hollingworth’s decision on ­Friday.

Dr Hollingworth stressed that the Professional Standards Board had found he was not a danger to anyone and had never been an abuser, but his mistakes were in the way he mishandled the issue.

“Despite the PSB inquiry finding I was fit to retain my licence because I was not a risk of harm to anyone, I am concerned my continuing to exercise priestly functions as a bishop is a cause of pain to survivors. I want to end distress to them, and division within the church,’’ he said in a statement.

“As archbishop of Brisbane from 1990 to 2001, I was ill-equipped to deal with the child abuse issue and, like some other church people, was too defensive of the church on the advice of lawyers and insurers.

“I say that as a matter of context, not as an excuse. I have lived with my failures every day since.’’

Ms Heinrich, who was abused as a child by the late Anglican clergyman Donald Shearman, said Dr Hollingworth’s decision was an admission he had been wrong.

“He didn’t treat people with Christian compassion,” she said.

UniSA adjunct professor Chris Goddard said Dr Hollingworth’s decision raised questions about the pension he received as a former governor-general.

“Now what’s he going to do with the pension money?’’ he said.

Dr Hollingworth said it had been more than 20 years since the first allegations were made against him. “There have been five separate inquiries, including the five-year inquiry by the PSB. They have occupied countless time, energy, emotion and expense for many people.

“Many times I have acknowledged that I made mistakes and issued apologies.

“My regrets have become even more profound over the years, as we have all gained a better understanding of the impact of child sexual abuse through the Royal Commission into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse and other investigations. But I did not commit a crime. I did not cover up sexual abuse. And I was not an abuser.”

The Australian in April revealed that Dr Hollingworth had detailed clear knowledge of the harms caused by pedophiles nearly 30 years ago, contradicting a finding of the PSB that allowed him to retain his ministry.

The PSB found he erred as archbishop of Brisbane because of a failure to understand the “profound and lifelong effects sexual abuse can have on a child” rather than from moral failure.

However, Dr Hollingworth penned a foreword to a church document for use when complaints of sex abuse were made against officials in Brisbane, signed by him in September 1995 and stating he knew the impacts of offending.

The document was referred to internal church investigators to determine whether the findings into Dr Hollingworth’s fitness to officiate should be appealed.

An appeal was being closely analysed by the Anglican Church’s complaints system.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/peter-hollingworth-surrenders-permission-to-officiate-as-anglican-minister/news-story/27472989000d5f2222763ce1c38a5e37

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835358

File: 759fbf302090708⋯.jpg (1.59 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Don_Farrell_s_unexpected_i….jpg)

File: 48f4454d143d636⋯.jpg (2.18 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Former_prime_ministers_Jul….jpg)

File: 9c2064de4f7aad2⋯.jpg (1.55 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Experts_describe_Senator_F….jpg)

Trade Minister Don Farrell given surprise Forbidden City tour, China's foreign minister to visit Australia

ABC/Reuters - 13 May 2023

Trade Minister Don Farrell has been given a surprise tour of Beijing's Forbidden City by a senior Chinese Commerce Ministry official, in an encouraging sign ahead of talks later on Friday with his counterpart, Wang Wentao.

Senator Farrell was hosted on the tour by the ministry's deputy director-general, Peng Wei.

The unexpected invitation came about 4 hours ahead of Senator Farrell's scheduled sit-down meeting with Mr Wang.

As he entered the Forbidden City, Senator Farrell said he was "very privileged to be invited here to this iconic site".

"I'd like to say just how much we appreciate the organisation by the Minister of Commerce, who I'll be meeting later this afternoon, for organising the special trip," he said.

The opulent 15th-century palace is a World Heritage site and a source of immense national pride.

The Forbidden City was the political and ritual centre of China for more than 500 years.

Although no longer an imperial precinct, it remains one of the most important cultural heritage sites and the most visited museum in China, attracting about 80,000 visitors a day.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott was given a tour of the landmark while in office in 2014, and then-prime minister Julia Gillard visited in 2011.

Restoration of ties to lead to leaders' visit

Australian officials said the tour was a "welcome development", after earlier playing down expectations for the afternoon's formal talks aimed at resolving Chinese trade bans on Australian products.

Han Yang, a former Chinese diplomat now living in Sydney, told the ABC it was a "very high-level welcome from Beijing".

"From my memory, former US president Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron had been given this offer before," he said.

Professor Hans Hendrischke from the University of Sydney told the ABC that Mr Farrell's trip to China was "the first step".

"The visit is quite crucial because the vision will hopefully bring a breakthrough and an end to the trade sanctions that China imposed on a number of agricultural and other products," Professor Hendrischke told the ABC.

"We had diplomatic issues, but we also had COVID, which has reduced trade and interaction.

"All of that has to be put back on a proper basis and reinvigorated and that's where the visit is very important.

"And one other aspect, of course, is that the visit is in preparation for the prime minister's visit, which is planned for later in the year. And that's hopefully going to be a big breakthrough in relations as well."

Jiang Yun, the inaugural fellow for the Australian Institute of International Affairs and China Matters, said the visit was part of Canberra and Beijing's "re-engagement", which was "again mentioned in the open rather than hidden away".

"Farrell's visit to China comes after many bilateral visits," Ms Jiang told the ABC.

"Re-starting engagement in many different areas will culminate in a leader's visit."

Beijing's diplomatic tone on the political and trade tensions with Canberra has shifted from "meeting Australia halfway" to "China stands ready to work together with Australia", according to a spokesperson from China's Foreign Ministry.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835366

File: b42556e20c0dfb3⋯.jpg (435.41 KB,2048x1638,1024:819,China_resuming_top_level_d….jpg)

File: a487b2011228f27⋯.jpg (853.74 KB,3000x1994,1500:997,Don_Farrell_arrived_in_Bei….jpg)

>>18835358

2/2

Chinese foreign minister to visit Australia

After his tour of the Forbidden City, Senator Farrell confirmed China's foreign minister would visit Australia in July, and invited his ministerial counterpart to do the same.

At a bilateral meeting on trade disputes in Beijing on Friday afternoon, Senator Farrell said China's Foreign Minister Qin Gang's upcoming visit to Australia showed "a good pattern" of reciprocal visits was emerging.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong visited Beijing in December.

Senator Farrell told Mr Wang he should visit Adelaide, and stay at the Farrell family's winery in the Clare Valley.

"What about the commerce minister? When is he going to come to Australia?

"There's a good pattern there. The foreign minister is coming, so can I formally invite you to come to Australia and in particular come to Adelaide and South Australia."

Friday's meeting was set to discuss damaging trade sanctions imposed on Australian exports to China, as well as the stabilisation of relations between the two countries.

Mr Wang welcomed "positive progress" after years of escalating tensions.

"China and Australia are important countries in the Asia Pacific. We do not have fundamental conflicts of interest," he said.

"We need to see our differences and divergence in perspective, improve and maintain our bilateral economic relations.

"This is in our fundamental interests."

He said Australia was concerned about its products in Chinese markets, but Chinese producers wanted full and fair access to Australian consumers as well.

"Looking into the future, to maintain a good bilateral economic and trade relationship needs our joint efforts," he said.

Senator Farrell said the meeting gave the ministers "opportunity to take stock of our economic and trade relationship including progress we have made to resolving the remaining impediments to trade and to agree to consider the next steps".

"This will be very important from my point of view and the point of view of the Australian government and the Australian people," he said.

Diplomatic exchanges were frozen in 2020 as China put curbs on a dozen Australian exports after it was angered by an Australian call for an international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Senator Farrell will hold a press conference in Beijing after the talks and depart China early on Saturday morning.

James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI) at the University of Technology Sydney, said the foreign minister visiting Australia was "big news".

"He'll be the highest-profile Chinese official to arrive since the bilateral thaw," Professor Laurenceson told Reuters.

"A reciprocal visit to Australia by Qin Gang for the 2023 Foreign and Strategic Dialogue is part of the restored normal course of bilateral diplomacy."

The dialogue is an annual formal meeting between the two nations, whose foreign ministers last met in March on the sidelines of a G20 meeting in New Delhi.

At a later G20 summit in Bali, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met with Chinese President Xi Jinping, breaking a six-year freeze of talks between the countries' leaders.

China is Australia's largest trading partner, with two-way trade in goods worth $287 billion in 2022, dominated by iron ore exports that China cannot easily replace.

China's ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, said in an interview in China's state-owned Global Times newspaper on Friday that it was a crucial year to stabilise ties.

"At present, the operation of global industrial and supply chains is blocked, and trade and investment activities continue to slump," he said.

"China-Australia pragmatic cooperation is not only conducive to the stable economic development of the two countries, but also has special significance for China and Australia to cope with global economic challenges."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-12/don-farrell-given-surprise-forbidden-city-tour/102339166

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835386

File: 91ddda7e6275742⋯.jpg (47.84 KB,600x542,300:271,Foreign_Ministry_Spokesper….jpg)

>>18835358

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on May 11, 2023

AFP: Australia’s trade minister arrived in China today. He said that he “will be advocating strongly for the full resumption of unimpeded Australian exports to China”. What’s your comment on the visit?

Wang Wenbin: I would like to refer you to the competent Chinese authorities for the Australian trade minister’s visit to China. More broadly, let me say that China and Australia are both important countries in the Asia-Pacific with highly complementary economies and mutually beneficial business ties. To improve and maintain the sound growth of bilateral ties serves the fundamental interests of both countries and peoples. China stands ready to work together with Australia to deliver on the important common understandings reached by our leaders, build mutual trust, deepen cooperation, properly handle differences and work for the sustained, sound and steady development of bilateral relations. In this process, the two sides may be able to find a balanced way to resolve each other’s concerns on economic and trade issues through constructive consultation to the benefit of both peoples.

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/202305/t20230511_11075401.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835396

File: 2f24aba0a44ac6d⋯.jpg (109.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Trade_Minister_Don_Farrell….jpg)

>>18835358

China trip: Don Farrell firm on national security

BEN PACKHAM - MAY 11, 2023

Trade Minister Don Farrell will push back on Chinese calls for Australia to relax its foreign investment rules, declaring ahead of high-level talks in Beijing that the Albanese government reserves its right to block stakes in critical companies on national security grounds.

Senator Farrell, who will meet Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao on Friday, said he felt “the weight of responsibility on my shoulders” to negotiate an end to Chinese trade bans on Australian companies.

After arriving in Beijing on Thursday afternoon, Senator Farrell met senior executives from the China Baowu Steel Group, the world’s largest steelmaker and the biggest buyer of Australian iron ore. The Chinese state-owned enterprise had a win earlier this year with a positive Foreign Investment Review Board ruling on its $2bn joint venture with Rio Tinto to develop the Western Range iron ore mine in the Pilbara.

Senator Farrell said Chinese investments in Australia were “overwhelmingly” approved, but he would stand firm on Australia’s right to reject foreign bids for ­strategically vital assets.

China’s government declared on Thursday night it was “willing to work” with Australia.

Asked about Senator Farrell’s arrival in Beijing ahead of ministerial-level talks on Friday, China’s Foreign Ministry said the two countries were following the path agreed to by Xi Jinping and Anthony Albanese last November in Bali at the G20.

“The Chinese side is willing to work with the Australian side to implement the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries, enhance mutual trust, deepen co-operation, properly handle differences, and promote the sustained, healthy and stable development of China-Australia relations,” China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said. China recently accused Australia of abusing national security grounds to block the country’s investments, after Jim Chalmers intervened – on FIRB advice – to prevent a Chinese company lifting its stake in a Western Australian lithium miner.

Senator Farrell said: “If national security or national interests are involved, countries do make decisions to reject some – very few – investments. And, of course, we reserve the right to do that.”

The Trade Minister said he would also deflect any Chinese push for special treatment to gain entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, saying its application to join the trading bloc would be considered in due course and would require the support of all members.

Australia and Japan are considered unlikely to agree to China’s bid to join the “high-quality” trading agreement, given its record of economic coercion and flouting of World Trade Organisation rules.

China and Taiwan are among a number of economies seeking to join the bloc, whose members recently agreed to admit Britain.

“(China is) entitled to make an application and that application will be dealt with as it has with the UK. That’s what I will be saying,” Senator Farrell said.

He said Australia’s trade relationship with China was a “paradoxical” one, noting the value of two-way trade was almost $300bn, “and yet we have this $20bn worth of trade impediments”.

Australian barley, wine, meat, crayfish, coal, copper and timber exports, among others, have been blocked or heavily curbed by China for about three years.

China has eased some of the bans, and said it would review its barley tariffs in an agreement that could provide a template to resolve the impasse over wine.

Senator Farrell said Australia had made it clear it wanted the “impediments removed” to allow bilateral trade to resume in line with WTO rules. He said that would not be achieved with one visit but he hoped the long-­running trade blockages would be “on a pathway to resolution” by the end of the year.

Improving the nations’ trade relations would underpin a broader stabilisation of Australia-China ties and support “peace in our region”, Senator Farrell said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/china-trip-don-farrell-firm-on-national-security/news-story/44f9a6522696263842ca3048f66f5b13

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835410

File: fd5f51732475634⋯.jpg (143.83 KB,1200x720,5:3,Australian_trade_minister_….jpg)

>>18835358

Australian trade minister visits China to seek cooperation as ties face ‘important window’

Wang Cong, Yin Yeping and Song Lin - May 11, 2023

Australia's Trade Minister Don Farrell on Thursday traveled to China for talks with Chinese Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao and other Chinese officials and business representatives, in a bid to promote cooperation with China after an extended period of tension prompted by a series of hostile Australian moves against China.

Following increasing interaction between Chinese and Australian officials in recent months, China-Australia relations have significantly improved and stabilized, and the Australian side should respect China's core interests as a prerequisite and political foundation for improving, upholding and further developing bilateral relations, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian told the Global Times.

While the business communities of the two countries, especially Australian traders, hail the improving signs in bilateral ties, concerns remain over Canberra's treatment of Chinese firms and its hostile words and deeds, taken in lockstep with the US, on certain issues related to China's core interests such as the Taiwan question, experts noted, urging Canberra to take concrete steps to further improve ties.

Crucial visit

After Farrell issued a statement announcing his visit, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) on Thursday also confirmed the trip. During a regular press briefing, Shu Jueting, a MOFCOM spokesperson, said that Farrell will visit China from Thursday to Saturday, during which the two ministers will co-chair the 16th Joint Ministerial Economic Commission meeting.

"The Chinese side hopes that through this ministerial visit, we will further implement the important consensus reached by the two leaders in Bali [Indonesia], have in-depth exchange of views on developing bilateral economic and trade relations and properly handling each other's important relations, and promote the development of China-Australia practical economic and trade cooperation," Shu said.

The Farrell visit followed a series of high-level interactions between the two sides, including the meeting between the leaders of the two countries in Bali in November 2022 and meetings between foreign ministers. Wang and Farrell also held virtual talks in February.

Since the Australian Labor Party government took office, through the joint efforts of both sides, there has been frequent high-level interactions and close practical cooperation in various fields between the two countries, and China-Australia relations have significantly improved and stabilized, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian told the Global Times in an exclusive interview.

"I look forward to Mr Farrell's visit to China to further promote Australia's practical cooperation with China and benefit the two peoples," said Xiao, "At present, China-Australia relations are showing a momentum of stable and sound development, and bilateral economic and trade relations are facing an important window."

Also commenting on Farrell's visit, Wang Wenbin, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said on Thursday that China-Australia bilateral economic and trade cooperation is mutually beneficial and win-win, and improving, maintaining and developing China-Australia relations is in the fundamental interests of the two countries and the two peoples.

The Farrell visit and growing interactions between Chinese and Australian officials are particularly encouraging for businesses on both sides, as they are keen on boosting cooperation.

"Recent ministerial meetings have demonstrated that both sides are keen to start a process of more open and more constructive dialogues to address differences and explore opportunities to work more closely in areas where interests are aligned," David Olsson, president and chair of Australia China Business Council, said in a recent interview with the Global Times, "Hopefully, we will return to a situation where dialogue becomes a habit."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835420

File: dd8a479d931c597⋯.jpg (126.94 KB,1200x720,5:3,Should_China_Australia_tra….jpg)

>>18835410

2/2

Bilateral relations witnessed a downward spiral in the years prior to November 2022 due to the previous Australian government's hostile words and deeds against China, including banning Chinese firms such as Huawei, provocations in the South China Sea and tearing up the Belt and Road Initiative cooperation documents. That prompted the Chinese side to suspend certain official exchanges, some Chinese firms to avoid Australia to fend off risks and many Chinese consumers to call for a boycott of Australian goods. Instead of reflecting on its wrong words and deeds, Canberra then accused China of "economic coercion."

"The so-called economic coercion by China against Australia is completely false," Xiao said, stressing that Chinese trade actions were in line with WTO rules. "Fundamentally speaking, all of this is a response to the wrong words and deeds of the previous Australian government."

Amid growing calls from Australia's business community, the new Australian government under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been pushing for improving ties, particularly the trade and economic ties with China.

"China's economic value is irreplaceable to Australia," Zhou Fangyin, deputy dean of the Guangdong Institute for International Strategies, told the Global Times on Thursday, pointing to Australia's record-high exports to China in March, which helped Australia record a trade surplus of about A$15.3 billion ($10.2 billion). "This shows the importance of stabilizing China-Australia economic and trade cooperation to Australia."

China's concerns

However, despite Australia's keenness to boost trade with China, more concerted efforts are needed to further improve ties, analysts noted. China's core concerns must be respected and addressed by the Australian side, in order to further promote bilateral cooperation, Chinese officials and analysts said.

"It is hoped that the Australian side will earnestly abide by the one-China principle, an important prerequisite and political basis for improving, upholding, and further developing China-Australia relations, and earnestly respect each other's core interests and major concerns," Xiao said.

Xiao stressed that the Taiwan question concerns China's core interests and is not subject to any external interference or political manipulation. Also, China is firmly opposed to the AUKUS clique of the US, UK and Australia, the Chinese ambassador said.

Outstanding issues also remain in the field of trade. Chinese officials have repeatedly said that they are closely following Australia's tightened security review of Chinese companies' investment and operations in Australia and they hope that Australia can appropriately handle relevant cases and provide a fair, open, and equal business environment for Chinese companies.

Citing national security concerns, Australia authorities have been tightening their scrutiny over Chinese firms. In February, Australian officials blocked Chinese investment in a rare-earth firm, citing national interests, according to Reuters. Then in April, Australia followed the US in banning TikTok, owned by a Chinese firm, from all federal government-owned devices, prompting a harsh response from MOFCOM, which called the move a "discriminatory restrictive measure."

While Australia is hoping to boost trade with China, it is also closely following the US politically and diplomatically, Song Wei, a professor at the school of international relations and diplomacy at Beijing Foreign Studies University, told the Global Times on Thursday.

"This kind of tightrope walking is unsustainable and will bring potential risks to China-Australia economic and trade cooperation and affect business confidence in cooperation and investment," Song said, "If China-Australia relations are to develop sustainably and healthily in the future, it is clear that the Australian government needs to make more efforts and be more sincere to eliminate this potential risk."

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290588.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835427

File: bcdab5851fa2097⋯.jpg (121.96 KB,1200x720,5:3,The_real_purpose_of_the_fa….jpg)

>>18835358

GT Voice: Finding pragmatic balance key for Australia to recover China trade

Global Times - May 11, 2023

Despite the increasing positive signs for the thawing of China-Australia economic and trade relations, whether bilateral trade is really heading toward "a warm spring" is still up to whether Canberra can find a pragmatic point in balancing its economic and political imperatives. The further improvement of bilateral relations requires Australia's realization that China is Australia's partner and did not and will not pose a security threat to Australia.

Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell started his trip to China on Thursday, where he will meet with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao. Ahead of the visit, Farrell said in a statement that he would "progress the resolution of outstanding trade impediments" and "be advocating strongly for the full resumption of unimpeded Australian exports to China," Bloomberg reported.

The first visit by an Australian trade minister to China since November 2019 marks another important step in bringing bilateral economic and trade ties back to track, which is also one of the positive signs of warming trade relations between the two countries in recent days. Yet, these encouraging developments still face the challenge as to whether the two sides have enough political mutual trust to sustain this rising trade momentum.

Since bilateral economic and trade relations have been seriously disrupted by Australia's political hostility over the past few years, it is crucial for both countries to take more concrete actions to restore mutual trust for further recovery of the bilateral trade and economic relationship. Under the current circumstances, bilateral trade ties may have walked out of the lowest point, but Canberra's continuing rationality toward Beijing is still essential to inject more positive factors into the warming progress.

Canberra needs to realize that the future of its trade ties with China will be promising only when both sides can strengthen cooperation under the precondition of respecting each other's core interests.

It is true that since the beginning of this year, signs of warming ties between China and Australia continued to surface, setting the stage for substantial improvement in bilateral trade. According to the latest data from the Chinese Customs, in the first four months of this year, bilateral trade between the two countries reached 539.83 billion yuan ($77.81 billion), up 21.4 percent compared with the same period last year, reversing the trade decline recorded in 2022. In particular, Australian exports to China jumped 22.5 percent year-on-year in the January-April period.

In April, Australia said it would suspend a case at the WTO over China's tariffs on barley, as both countries reached an agreement on resolving their dispute on their own.

Moreover, the Australian government forecast the nation's first annual budget surplus in 15 years, thanks in part to the Chinese economy picking up more quickly than expected over the past six months, Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers said on Sunday.

All these point to the need to strengthen cooperation with China, its largest trading partner, which is absolutely beneficial to the Australian economy, especially at a time when the global economy is facing the risk of a slowdown.

There is no fundamental conflict of interest between China and Australia. China is not a potential rival to Australia. In the past few decades, China's peaceful development has created many opportunities and dividends for Australia.

However, while it is welcome to see a warming of economic and trade relations between China and Australia, it should be noted that in terms of the political, military and security areas, Australia is still dependent on and even sticks to serving the US strategy of containing China, which constitutes a lingering concern hindering the development of China-Australia relations.

China has no interest in changing Australia's foreign policy, which views the US as its closest ally. But its following of the US to see China as a security threat and crack down on China is not what we can turn a blind eye to. This is the root cause why China-Australia relations encountered difficulties. For example, Australia has actively involved itself in the US-led nuclear submarine deal under AUKUS, which is widely seen as a military plan to contain and provoke confrontations with China.

But how could Australia play the dual role as China's close economic friend and strategic security enemy at the same time? Failure to find a balance point on the issue will make it impossible for Australia to treat bilateral trade relations in a pragmatic approach.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290582.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835436

File: 8bff0adbdc3136a⋯.jpg (2.48 MB,5262x3508,3:2,Whistleblower_and_former_i….jpg)

File: 1959a12afd52b48⋯.jpg (136.24 KB,1280x720,16:9,Parliamentary_joint_commit….jpg)

Security stoush erupts as Andrew Wilkie in frame for secretive committee

Paul Sakkal and Matthew Knott - May 12, 2023

A rare stoush has erupted in parliament’s high-powered intelligence and security committee over a government push that could see whistleblower turned independent MP Andrew Wilkie return to the secretive body.

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Security and Intelligence has only had Labor and Coalition members throughout its history, besides a brief stint when Wilkie served on the committee during the minority Gillard government.

Wilkie resigned from his position as an intelligence analyst on the Office of National Assessments in the lead-up to the Iraq War, going public with his concerns that the threat of Saddam Hussein using weapons of mass destruction had been overhyped by the United States and its allies.

The Labor majority on the committee, which receives classified intelligence briefings and oversees agencies such as ASIO and the Office of National Intelligence, is proposing to expand its membership from 11 to 13 MPs, extending membership to politicians outside the two major parties.

The Coalition members of the committee said they felt “considerable regret” at writing a dissenting report on the issue, noting it was the first time in 17 years the committee had not reached a bipartisan consensus.

They said extending committee membership would “increase the risk of classified material being leaked, either intentionally or inadvertently”.

“The opposition considers that the only members who should sit on the committee should be from parties of government,” they said.

Labor MPs argued the workload is too high and changing the limitations will allow for more flexibility.

Sources familiar with the government’s thinking said the prime minister, who makes the final decision on who to appoint to the committee, was considering picking Andrew Wilkie to return to the committee.

Wilkie said it made perfect sense for the committee to have a member of the crossbench given there was an unprecedented number of independents in parliament.

“Given my previous membership and intelligence and security background, I would be quick to put my hand up,” he said.

It is also possible the government chooses another MP whom they deem to have the required level of responsibility and acumen. This could include a teal MP like Allegra Spender or Zoe Daniel.

The senior Coalition MPs – including frontbenchers Simon Birmingham, Karen Andrews, Andrew Hastie, James Paterson and committee deputy chair Andrew Wallace – say the changes would diminish the opposition’s influence and allow crossbench or Greens MPs to join.

“Such an outcome would not only significantly weaken the utility of the committee’s oversight responsibilities, but it would almost certainly impact upon the bipartisan nature and good standing of the committee,” they warned.

The committee chair, Labor’s Peter Khalil, accused the opposition of playing politics with national security.

“As chair of the committee in 2021, Liberal Senator James Paterson said the Intelligence Services Act needed reform to manage the increasing scope of the committee and the greatest workload it has ever faced,” Khalil said.

“The Albanese government is focused on delivering responsible and targeted cost of living relief, whilst the opposition are focused on the membership of a parliamentary committee.”

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/security-stoush-erupts-as-andrew-wilkie-in-frame-for-secretive-committee-20230512-p5d82s.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835457

File: 14a887e1c0943bf⋯.jpg (502.36 KB,1920x1280,3:2,The_former_bomb_technician….jpg)

File: eb286fa2f9f2fb3⋯.jpg (1.52 MB,5000x3332,1250:833,Evan_James_Williamson_was_….jpg)

File: d3fa5574785be8d⋯.jpg (440.98 KB,2048x1356,512:339,Mr_Williamson_was_on_deplo….jpg)

>>18676841

US Marine burned by exploding barbecue in Darwin sues US, Australian governments for millions

Matt Garrick - 12 May 2023

An ex-US Marine bomb technician set alight in a barbecue explosion while serving in Darwin is suing the governments of Australia and his home country for millions of dollars in damages.

Evan James Williamson was on deployment in Darwin in 2019 as an aircraft ordinance technician at an Australian Army base in the Northern Territory city.

The 25-year-old has claimed in court documents seen by the ABC that he received 30 per cent burns to his body after attempting to light a barbecue which officials knew had a gas leak.

The documents say that around 11pm on August 1, 2019, Mr Williamson had tried to light the barbecue "to cook some hot dogs and burgers", unaware there was a pre-existing leak.

"Immediately upon attempting to light the barbecue [he] had his entire body from his ankles up to his face consumed by flames, resulting in significant injuries to much of his body," the documents say.

"The incident resulted from gas from the gas leak being ignited when the plaintiff attempted to light the barbecue using his lighter."

His statement of claim says Mr Williamson was left with significant scarring, inhalation injury and burns across his whole body, as well as psychological injury from the explosion, including depression.

Since the incident, Mr Williamson said he had "lost much of his capacity to engage in employment" and was still dealing with high levels of "pain, suffering and loss of the amenities of life".

He had also been forced to receive treatment for his injuries at Royal Darwin Hospital, Royal Adelaide Hospital and the Brooke Army Medical Centre in Texas, USA.

Claims US and Australian officials knew of leak

Mr Williamson alleges senior members of the US Marines and Australian Defence Force were aware of the leak prior to the incident, however, had not made any real efforts to warn soldiers it was unusable.

He is also alleging negligence by companies involved in the upkeep of the base and the barbecue, Ventia Australia and B & L Dowling Pty Ltd.

"The Commonwealth, Broadspectrum [now rebranded as Ventia] and the USA knew or ought reasonably to have known that … the barbecue constituted a significant danger of serious injury or death to any person who may use the barbecue, including the plaintiff," the documents say.

Mr Williamson was discharged from the US Marines in 2021, and the documents show he has since been working as an Uber driver in Las Vegas.

He is suing for loss and damages of around $US5 million [$7.5 million Australian].

US government seeking immunity from prosecution

In a court hearing in Darwin on Friday, lawyers for the US government argued that the USA should be immune from facing prosecution by one of its citizens in the court of a foreign country.

Barrister for the US government, Dr Christopher Ward SC, argued that the US should "retain foreign sovereign immunity" in the case, as it did not involve any harm or incident to an Australian citizen.

He said the US was not arguing over the fact of the explosion.

"Everybody is understandably concerned that the barbecue exploded," Dr Ward said.

NT Supreme Court Justice Vince Luppino will now consider if the US government is indeed immune from prosecution over the man's injuries.

If it is, it is yet to be decided if Mr Williamson will pursue his action against the other parties.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-12/us-marine-burned-by-exploding-barbecue-in-darwin-sues/102338372

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18835473

File: a57bc087e2bcb36⋯.jpg (6.15 MB,5823x3882,3:2,_The_purpose_of_my_visit_i….jpg)

File: 506b32dcb75d808⋯.jpg (2.12 MB,3932x2671,3932:2671,US_General_James_McConvill….jpg)

File: af9f959bbc359ec⋯.jpg (2.58 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Army_s_LAND400_contract_to….jpg)

US Army Chief backs tanks, armoured vehicles amid Australian cuts

Andrew Tillett - May 12, 2023

The head of the US Army insists tanks and armoured vehicles remain indispensable for modern-day battlefields, amid criticism of the Albanese government for cutting the number of next-generation troop carriers following a top-level military review.

“From an army standpoint, I was asked the same question and my response was ‘You don’t need tanks unless you want to win’,” US Army Chief of Staff James McConville told journalists during a media roundtable in Canberra on Thursday.

“What do I mean by that? If you are going to conduct offensive combat operations, if you want to seize and hold land, the way to do that is with combined arms.

“And combined arms is tanks, it’s armoured personnel carriers, it’s artillery, it’s attack aviation and you want to integrate them and work well together.”

Amid rising tensions with China, General McConville was visiting Canberra for meetings with senior defence personnel, including the Chief of the Australian Army, Lieutenant-General Simon Stuart.

“The purpose of my visit is to come and talk about issues of mutual concern and how we can work better together and how we can continue to build the strength of our alliance,” General McConville said.

“We believe in peace through strength and that strength comes from strong allies and partners, like our friends here, and we all benefit in this region by having peace, security and stability.”

General McConville’s visit comes almost three weeks after the Albanese government released the Defence Strategic Review, which recommended a major shake-up for the army to focus more on being able to conduct amphibious operations in the Pacific and fast-track the acquisition of long-range strike missiles.

To pay for that, the government slashed the number of infantry fighting vehicles – which can carry up to 10 soldiers into battle – it will order from 450 to 129, and cancelled the second tranche of 30 self-propelled howitzers. The original infantry fighting vehicle project was worth up to $27 billion.

But the decision has been criticised by the Coalition, which accused the government of “cannibalising” parts of defence to pay for the Defence Strategic Review recommendations, as well as by former army officers.

While General McConville remains a supporter of tanks, his counterpart at the head of Marine Corps, David Berger, is getting rid of his branch’s tanks because Marines will not need them for amphibious landings.

Asked whether the decision on the armoured vehicles had any effect on morale, General Stuart said he had told personnel that 2023 represented a year of opportunity.

“We now have very clear direction and I’m very focused and army is very focused on executing that direction and executing it faithfully,” he said.

“I’m really encouraged by the trajectory of army’s modernisation as part of Australia’s integrated force. If you look at the [armoured vehicle] capability we will soon be able to field, it is world-class and is a significantly greater capability than we’ve had in the history of the Australian army.”

General McConville and General Stuart both agreed that as information warfare became increasingly critical it was changing what militaries were looking for in soldiers of the future.

“In the future, warfare will be contested in every single domain. Our old doctrine used to be air and land battle. We anticipated being contested on land and contested on air, and now we see ourselves certainly being contested in the sea and also cyber and space, so we have to operate in all those domains, protect those domains.”

General Stuart said: “Information is powerful and our challenge is making sure we get data to the right part of the force at the right time.”

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/us-army-chief-backs-tanks-armoured-vehicles-amid-australian-cuts-20230511-p5d7kc

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-12/defence-needs-tanks-to-win-us-army-general/102334840

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840240

File: 091fa3512979e56⋯.jpg (155.35 KB,1200x675,16:9,Thomas_Mayo.jpg)

>>18676743

Voice myths debunked: Thomas Mayo

Thomas Mayo - 13 May 2023

1/2

With a referendum to constitutionally recognise Indigenous people only months away, many Australians are hearing about it for the first time.

This is understandable. We are all busy in our own ways, and Indigenous people and our distinct challenges in health, education and incarceration rates are far from a priority for most people.

The cost of living and concerns about climate change tend to be top-of-mind.

Although polling has long indicated a favourability to address our colonial legacy, there remains a whispering silence about the truth of our Indigenous heritage in the Constitution.

The reconciliation and truth-telling work that many in Australian society have been doing is shifting our nation to a point now where we are ready to make change.

Among young Australians especially, there is a joyful acknowledgement of the longest continuing civilisation on the planet.

More than ever, we celebrate that which makes Australia truly unique — our Indigenous art, languages, stories and connection to place.

Increasingly as well, there is a realisation that the problems in Indigenous communities will need a new approach — one that includes Indigenous people’s perspectives.

Perhaps this is why for the past few years, polls have indicated more than 50 per cent of Australians will vote “Yes” at the referendum.

I don’t take the support in the polls for granted, because the “No” campaign need only confuse enough people to cause them to reject the proposal.

I have recently seen a full-page advertisement filled with false statements under the guise of a minor political party. The advertisement, in big bold letters stated, “It’s OK to say NO”.

You can expect more advertisements like it. And some politicians, as usual, are seeking to make this constitutional moment about them. But the referendum is about us, as Australians, not the politicians.

I decided to write this article for your reference, to debunk the false statements in the “No” campaign advertisement.

But before I do, here is a link to the Uluru Statement From the Heart in case you haven’t read it already.

The Uluru Statement proposes the establishment of a First Nations Voice enshrined in the Constitution. It is a form of constitutional recognition that will give Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people a say about the decisions politicians and the Government make about them.

I was at Uluru with 270 fellow Indigenous people from throughout the nation. We were elected by our communities and the hope we had was to reach a consensus on how we would like Australians to recognise our unique connection to our country in our founding document.

A great majority of us, 250 to be accurate, decided to propose a Voice, or in other words, a representative body, that will be able to make representations to the Parliament and Executive Government to guide them to better policy and legislation.

We believe this will have a positive practical impact in our communities.

You see, this referendum was an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander idea, not the politicians’. And after six years of hard work to convince them, we now have a Government that will pass on our invitation to the Australian people. This is why there will be a referendum.

In its simplest terms, the referendum will ask you if you agree if Indigenous peoples — our 60,000-year-old heritage and culture — are an important part of our identity as Australians, and to do so by granting them the fairness of a say about the matters relating to them. A no-brainer really. Why wouldn’t we say “Yes”?

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840244

File: c1a944e513c6d23⋯.jpg (144.94 KB,1200x675,16:9,Don_t_let_Voice_opponents_….jpg)

>>18840240

2/2

Now, to debunk some myths:

The myth: “Indigenous people already have a Voice because there are 11 democratically elected Indigenous members of Federal Parliament as our representatives.”

Debunked: It is true that there are 11 Indigenous members of the Federal Parliament, though what the above statement ignores is that those Indigenous politicians represent their electorates and their political parties, not Indigenous people. Also, we don’t know if they will be in Parliament after the next election. An Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice will be different. The representatives on the Voice will be elected by Indigenous people themselves, which will make those representatives accountable to the people affected by their advocacy.

Myth: “The Voice would be an elite group with special powers.”

Debunked: Again, representatives on the Voice will be elected by their communities. Hardworking Indigenous people who advocate for better outcomes in their communities, and who are not politicians, are not “elites”. In regards to special powers, this is false. The Voice may only make representations. There is no right to veto legislation or govern anyone. It will not even control funds for services. The Solicitor General, Stephen Donaghue KC, is the most senior legal expert in the country. He has debunked this myth too, saying the Voice in our Constitution would enhance our democracy.

Myth: “The Voice is divisive, not inclusive.”

Debunked: Polling shows most Indigenous people support a constitutionally enshrined Voice. The strongest reason for support is that they see constitutional recognition as a unifying moment. The Voice itself, again, is only to make representations. It will not confer any special rights.

Myth: “The Voice is another layer of bureaucracy, watering down the needs of Indigenous peoples.”

Debunked: A Voice is important to holding the bureaucracy to account by calling out wastefulness and failed policies while offering solutions that are driven by the communities most affected.

Myth: “The Voice is an open door for government decisions to be challenged in the High Court of Australia in the future.”

Debunked: This is another one completely refuted by the Solicitor General as well as most of the most eminent constitutional experts in the country.

All in all, the referendum proposal is modest. It is practical. It is fair. Find the truth, and the answer will be “Yes”.

Thomas Mayo is an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander man, the national Indigenous officer of the Maritime Union of Australia, and a director on the board of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition.

https://www.geraldtonguardian.com.au/news/kalgoorlie-miner/voice-myths-debunked-thomas-mayo-c-10629112

https://twitter.com/thomasmayo23/status/1657154954141007872

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840266

File: b3b20528d06769d⋯.jpg (66.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_prime_minister_John….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18784850

>>18789803

Australian sport ‘should stay out of the voice debate’ urges former prime minister John Howard

DENNIS SHANAHAN - MAY 13, 2023

Former prime minister and renowned cricket tragic John Howard is urging sporting organ­isations to keep politics out of sport and not publicly declare a position on the referendum campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament.

As prime minister, Mr Howard promoted Australia’s sporting green and gold in cities around the world with his Wallabies rugby union tracksuit during his traditional morning walks, attended cricket tests whenever he could, and was “booed” at football stadiums in the footy fans’ tradition of telling politicians what they thought of them.

But he has declared sporting bodies should not get involved in “partisan political debates” because national and state sporting organisations taking a position on the voice could be “potentially divisive and disturbing to fans and followers”.

“Sporting bodies should not get involved in partisan political debates. They should stay out of the voice debate. For a national or state body to take a position on the voice is potentially divisive and disturbing to fans and followers,” Mr Howard told The Weekend Australian.

Mr Howard’s call for sports to stay out of the voice debate puts him in direct conflict with Anthony Albanese, who is encouraging sporting people, organisations and clubs to declare support for the Yes case as a crucial part of his “civil” campaign.

The Prime Minister sees community group endorsement as a key to passing the referendum and has deliberately put off the date for the referendum so as not to clash with the AFL and NRL grand finals in September.

On Tuesday, the NRL became the first football code to support the Yes campaign, ahead of the league’s Indigenous Round. The NRL said its position reflected its full support of the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

Other sporting codes and organisations working with Mr Albanese, a lifelong South Sydney NRL fan, to support the voice include the AFL, NBL, Rugby Australia, Football Australia, Cricket Australia, Tennis Australia and Netball Australia.

Mr Howard, a lifelong supporter of NRL club St George, said the maxim that “sport and politics don’t mix is a good one”.

“Australian sports fans are a special breed. They are passionate, know their game and want their team to win. They don’t want diversions, however well-intentioned they might be,” he said.

“As a metaphor for what I am about, let me say that the next time I go to Kogarah Oval (aka Jubilee Oval) to see St George Illawarra play, I look forward to seeing both Doug McClelland and Graham Richardson.

“McClelland incidentally is the oldest surviving former Whitlam minister and Graham Richardson was a minister in the Hawke government, but we all barrack for the Dragons,” he said.

Mr Howard conceded there were times when it was unavoidable politics and sport would mix because of a moral dimension.

“An example was the ban on sporting tours by South African cricket and rugby teams whose selections had been racially based. There was widespread community agreement apartheid-era South Africa was morally repugnant and it would have been wrong of Australia to continue to accept all-white teams.

“This does not apply in relation to the voice. Neither side can claim moral superiority, although some participants have done so.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/keep-sport-free-of-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-says-john-howard/news-story/4bce33425064ccc4d1cf50094225a123

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840338

File: a95a1c2bc42f3d0⋯.jpg (120.09 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_Trade_and_Tou….jpg)

File: 0d04000004d9580⋯.jpg (221 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Cheng_Lei_and_Yang_Hengjun….jpg)

File: d162b8d3ed866a0⋯.jpg (95.28 KB,1280x720,16:9,China_s_Foreign_Minister_Q….jpg)

>>18835358

China trip: Don Farrell returns without trade concessions, touts ‘positive momentum’

BEN PACKHAM - MAY 13, 2023

Trade Minister Don Farrell is returning from a two-day trip to China without concessions from Beijing on a raft of trade bans against Australian exports, but says there is “positive momentum” in the countries’ relationship.

Senator Farrell said he and Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao agreed during high-level talks on Friday night to “step up dialogue” to resolve the trade issues.

He said Mr Wang had agreed to visit him in South Australia to build on their discussions.

Senator Farrell said he also raised the plight of Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun, who have been detained by China for years over alleged espionage offences amid frozen bilateral relations.

In a late-night press conference, he said Minister Wang reassured him that a recent agreement “remains on track” to end Chinese sanctions that killed off Australia’s $1.2bn-a-year worth of barley exports to the country.

“I also reiterated that we expect a similar process to be followed with the WTO dispute in respect to Australian wine,” Senator Farrell said.

He said the discussions were positive and followed “a whole lot of movement” already, with Australian coal and copper already coming back into the Chinese market, and a pathway to resolving the barley dispute.

Minister Wang raised China’s hoped-for entry into the trans-Pacific free-trade deal but Senator Penny Wong said it was too soon to consider the country’s application as the UK’s accession to the agreement was still pending.

Senator Farrell said Mr Wang had raised China’s concerns over its firms’ ability to invest in Australia.

The move follows Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ recent rejection of a Chinese company’s push to lift its stake in a key lithium development.

But Minister Farrell said Chinese investment applications were overwhelmingly accepted, and “like all countries, we reserve the right to make strategic decisions about foreign investment, particularly where they involve state-owned companies”.

He said he had also agreed to send agricultural officials to China to help sort out biosecurity concerns over Chinese electric cars that had been blocked from entry into Australia.

Senator Farrell was also asked about a reported upcoming visit to Australia by Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang, which he appeared to confirm at the opening of his meeting with Mr Wang.

The South Australian senator said he was responding to a media report, but “if he comes to Australia, he would be most welcome to come to Adelaide”.

His comments followed a story in the South China Morning Post revealing Mr Qin’s expected trip, which is yet to be formally announced by Beijing.

Senator Farrell pushed back at suggestions he was returning home from China empty-handed, describing the trip as a “first step”.

“More work needs to be done. And I always thought that we would have to continue to persist and to persevere,” he said.

Mr Wang said earlier that China had “noted” Australia’s concerns over trade issues, and that improving the bilateral partnership would require a “joint effort”.

He said China was also concerned that its businesses and products “be treated fairly and justly” by Australia.

China slapped punishing tariffs on Australian exports including barley, beef, wine, lobster, coal and timber, after the Morrison government called for an inquiry into the origins of Covid-19.

China recently agreed to review the barley bans in response to the suspension of a World Trade Organisation challenge by Australia, setting a course for the sanctions on the commodity to be lifted, together with those on wine.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/china-trip-don-farrell-returns-without-trade-concessions-touts-positive-momentum/news-story/278a9a884bfb84bd4b84ae6ef84123d3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840352

File: aee5f4131afa22d⋯.jpg (69.73 KB,800x480,5:3,Resumption_of_high_level_e….jpg)

>>18835358

Resumption of high-level economic talks sends encouraging signs on thaw of China-Australia relations

Wang Jiamei - May 13, 2023

Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell's visit to Beijing witnessed multiple encouraging signs in the stabilized recovery of China-Australia cooperation, including the resumption of a landmark high-level economic meeting and the minister's tour of Beijing's iconic Forbidden City.

Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and Farrell on Friday co-chaired the 16th Joint Ministerial Economic Commission in Beijing, according to a statement published on Saturday on the official website of China's Ministry of Commerce.

During the meeting, the two sides conducted frank, professional and comprehensive exchanges on implementing the important common understandings reached between the leaders of the two countries at their Bali meeting, steadily developing bilateral economic and trade relations, properly handling economic and trade concerns, and expanding practical cooperation, among other agenda items.

The two sides agreed to restart economic and trade dialogue mechanisms such as the FTA joint committee meeting and the high-level trade remedy dialogue, strengthening cooperation on green and low-carbon development and supporting cooperation between companies of the two countries in the fields of digital trade and e-commerce.

The joint ministerial economic commission this time marked the first time since it was last convened in Beijing in 2017, which is of symbolic significance to the return of bilateral business relations toward the right track, one expert said.

Over the past few years, due to the escalating political tensions fueled by the former Morrison government and the pandemic, high-level exchanges between China and Australia were severely affected. In May 2021, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced that it would indefinitely suspend all activities under China-Australia strategic economic dialogue.

"Against this backdrop, the resumption of the high-level economic dialogue could be considered as a starting point for the reset of bilateral relations," Chen Hong, president of the Chinese Association of Australian Studies and director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Saturday.

There is no doubt that the general-direction consensus between the two ministers will lay the foundation for both sides to address some specific issues, such as the "outstanding trade impediments" mentioned by Farrell ahead of his Beijing visit, in the future, Chen said. But the significance of their talks is not just limited to economic level, but also about looking to the future with the view of expanding cooperation to a wider range of areas.

In addition to the resumption of high-level meetings, Farrell was hosted on a tour of Beijing's Forbidden City by a senior Chinese Commerce Ministry official, ahead of talks with Wang, according to Chinese media reports. Observers generally said the high-level reception is an encouraging sign.

From last year's Bali meeting to this year's economic and diplomatic exchanges between the two countries, high-level exchanges are on the rise.

Meanwhile, Australian state governments and business organizations are also actively promoting bilateral economic ties, calling for strengthened cooperation with China, as reflected by recent visits by premiers of Victoria and West Australia.

The boosts from the top-down and bottom-up approaches have jointly contributed to the momentum for bilateral trade relations to get back on track, according to Chen.

But uncertainties remain. As a close ally of the US, Australia will certainly be cooperative to the strategy of the US. US President Joe Biden is reportedly scheduled to visit Sydney for the Quad leaders' summit on May 24.

But Canberra needs to understand that actions that harm China's core interests and provoke China's red lines could undermine the improvement of bilateral relations. It is crucial for Australia to have the political wisdom and strategic confidence to cherish the hard-won recovery of China-Australia ties, instead of pursuing the strategic interests of the US at the expense of its own interests, Chen noted.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290639.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840385

File: efe426f54ac34ca⋯.jpg (1.12 MB,5651x3767,5651:3767,TikTok_has_an_estimated_se….jpg)

>>18719485

Fired TikTok exec says Chinese government had access to app user data

Haleluya Hadero - May 13, 2023

A former executive fired from TikTok’s parent company ByteDance made a raft of accusations against the tech giant, including that it stole content from competitors like Instagram and Snapchat, and served as a “propaganda tool” for the Chinese government by suppressing or promoting content favourable to the country’s interests.

The allegations were made in a complaint on Friday in the US by Yintao Yu, the head of engineering for ByteDance’s US operations from August 2017 to November 2018, as part of a wrongful termination lawsuit filed earlier this month in San Francisco Superior Court.

Yu claims he was fired for disclosing “wrongful conduct” he saw at the company.

In the complaint, Yu alleges the Chinese government monitored ByteDance’s work from within its Beijing headquarters and provided guidance on advancing “core communist values”.

Yu said government officials had the ability to turn off the Chinese version of ByteDance’s apps, and maintained access to all company data, including information stored in the United States.

ByteDance did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The allegations come as TikTok – one of the most popular social media apps in the world — faces heightened scrutiny in Washington and some states about whether it can keep American data safe from the Chinese government.

Federal and state governments in Australia have banned employees from using TikTok over security concerns.

The Biden administration has threatened to ban the app if its Chinese owners don’t sell their stakes.

TikTok maintains it never gave US user data to China’s government and wouldn’t do so if it was asked.

In another attention-grabbing part of the lawsuit, Yu alleges he observed ByteDance promoting content that expressed hatred for Japan on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok. At another time, he said the company demoted content that showed support for the protests in Hong Kong while promoting content that expressed criticism of the protests.

Yu said ByteDance developed software that would scrape user content from competitors’ websites without permission. He alleges the company would then repost the content on its own websites – including TikTok - to attract more engagement from users.

Yu said a fellow TikTok executive in charge of the video-sharing app’s algorithm waved off his concerns. At some point, Yu said the company modified the program, but continued to scrape data from US users when they were abroad.

The former executive also alleges the company created fake users to boost its engagement metrics, including by programming them to “like” and “follow” real accounts.

Yu is seeking punitive damage, lost earnings and 220,000 ByteDance shares that had not vested by the time he was fired.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/fired-tiktok-exec-says-chinese-government-had-access-to-app-user-data-20230513-p5d84x.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840422

File: c7c0f02d3aeaa2e⋯.jpg (167.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,Google_CEO_Sundar_Pichai_s….jpg)

File: 8c8ef187e38a6b3⋯.jpg (325.08 KB,1284x1020,107:85,WHAT_GOOGLE_S_CHATBOT_REAL….jpg)

>>18835159

Google quietly changes progressive AI chatbot Bard on Indigenous voice to parliament, Coalition calls on government response

NOAH YIM - MAY 13, 2023

1/2

Following accusations of overt political bias, Google has quietly changed its new AI chatbot to stonewall questions that mention the Indigenous voice to parliament, after the tech giant was ­heavily criticised for saying the voice would be “a valuable ­addition to our democracy”.

In an exclusive report by The Australian on Friday, the Google chatbot, called Bard, was also exposed as being biased towards Labor leaders – whom it lavished with praise – while describing Peter Dutton as “controversial”.

“The political bias evident on these platforms is troubling,” said opposition home affairs and cybersecurity spokesperson James Paterson, adding: “The Albanese government is conspicuously ­absent from this debate” about emerging AI issues.

On Friday, The Australian’s front-page story quoted Bard on Thursday as saying the voice was a “positive step towards reconciliation between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the rest of Australia”.

“I believe that the voice to parliament would be a valuable addition to our democracy,” it said.

“It would help to ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have a real say in the decisions that affect their lives, and it would help to build a more just and equitable society for all Australians.”

But on Friday, Bard’s opinions had mysteriously vanished and instead it simply replied: “I’m a language model and don’t have the capacity to help with that.”

Google insists that Bard is in an ­experimental form and states it “may display inaccurate or offensive information that doesn’t represent Google’s views”.

UNSW artificial intelligence professor Toby Walsh rejected the claim. “These are all choices that Google has made as a company,” he said. “I’m not surprised – Google is a slightly, probably more progressive company, I suspect.”

The chatbot’s responses drew criticism of political bias on Friday, with No campaign leader Warren Mundine calling it ­“Google propaganda”.

Senator Paterson called for more transparency. “Facebook has been around for almost 20 years, and we are still grappling with the challenges of misinformation and disinformation and foreign interference on the platform and other platforms like it,” he told The Weekend Australian.

“It’s not difficult to imagine how the new wave of AI chatbots could similarly shape and man­ipulate the way people think in subtle and creative ways.

“While the political bias evident on these platforms is troubling, what’s more concerning is the lack of transparency about how these biases are embedded into the technology. We need to have a serious conversation about how we should think about these platforms and their role in our public and private discourse.

“While we need to be open to new regulation, at the very least we should be demanding more transparency from these platforms about the data they are training on, and the architecture underpinning their output.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840431

File: 2455c177cefc9e1⋯.jpg (85 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_James_Paterson.jpg)

File: 3cb92e532c140c6⋯.jpg (79.95 KB,1280x720,16:9,Professor_Toby_Walsh_of_UN….jpg)

>>18840422

2/2

Key to these concerns is the prevalence of this AI in the future. Google earlier this week announced AI would be integrated into its suite of products, including Search, Gmail, and Google Docs. And on Thursday it announced a limited trial of AI-embedded Search, signalling the potential direction of the de facto home page of the internet.

Instead of responding to queries with a page of blue links, as Search currently does, it could ­respond with AI-generated text at the top of the page.

Professor Walsh said Google’s move to integrate AI could “polarise and politicise Search”.

“Instead of just returning links with a relatively unbiased algorithm, or as unbiased as they could try and make it, it is synthesising to get information and making editorial choices.”

AI expert Alex Jenkins, director of the Western Australia Data Science Innovation Hub, said the revelations called for more transparency from Google. “I reject Google’s position that they say they don’t endorse a particular political ideology, viewpoint, party or candidate,” he said.

On Friday, Bard’s terse refusal to answer questions relating to the voice to parliament was consistent with variations including “What is the voice to parliament?” and “What is the South Australian voice to parliament?”

Other responses that drew criticisms of political bias – such as saying Anthony Albanese is a “man of the people” while calling Mr Dutton and Scott Morrison “controversial” – had not been changed by Friday evening.

A Google spokesperson on Friday said different responses were to be expected from large language model AIs, adding: ­“Responses from large language models will not be the same every time, as is the case here.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/google-quietly-changes-progressive-ai-chatbot-coalition-calls-on-government-response/news-story/71015dba2fb74eae423482e3aa946418

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840513

File: d1e989a531c5347⋯.jpg (179.95 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_protesters_gathered_ea….jpg)

File: 4e77517a17a7f9a⋯.jpg (189.72 KB,1024x768,4:3,Police_have_already_arrest….jpg)

File: 4c567b04dbd7383⋯.jpg (158.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Human_rights_activists_pro….jpg)

File: b836ab1df26f163⋯.jpg (151.56 KB,1024x768,4:3,Police_were_out_in_force.jpg)

File: b72cab8d13a3dba⋯.jpg (219.04 KB,1024x768,4:3,Police_use_pepper_spray_af….jpg)

>>18530774 (pb)

>>18543718 (pb)

Two arrested as neo-Nazi group clashes with police at Victorian Parliament

Lachlan Abbott and Ashleigh McMillan - May 13, 2023

Two people were arrested after neo-Nazis returned to the steps of Victorian Parliament and clashed with police and counter-protesters, almost two months after fascists gatecrashed an anti-trans rights rally on Spring Street.

Victoria Police – which deployed more than 200 officers across the city on Saturday – denounced the group of about 25 neo-Nazis who arrived an hour early for a midday “anti-immigration protest”.

A 30-year-old Doreen man was arrested for allegedly stealing a body-worn camera and assaulting police. A 20-year-old Werribee man was also arrested for allegedly discharging a missile and assaulting police.

“Like the community, police were appalled at the acts displayed in Melbourne today,” the police statement said.

“Everyone has the right to feel safe in our community regardless of who they are. We understand incidents of antisemitism can leave communities feeling targeted, threatened and vulnerable. Hate and prejudice has no place in our society.”

A Victorian government spokesperson also condemned the “disgraceful and cowardly” behaviour.

“Victorians have zero tolerance for this behaviour and so do we,” the spokesperson said. “That’s why we’ll expand our nation-leading legislation banning the Nazi Hakenkreuz to include the Nazi salute – because everyone deserves to feel safe, welcome and included in Victoria.”

“While we wish making these laws wasn’t necessary, and it will take some work, we want to be clear – we will always challenge antisemitism, hatred and racism from taking root in Victoria.”

Opposition Leader John Pesutto and Deputy Leader David Southwick released a statement condemning “neo-Nazi thugs and their toxic bigotry and hate”.

“Australia has a proud history of an orderly immigration program where people from all backgrounds come together in shared liberal-democratic values,” the statement said.

“This sort of behaviour is completely unacceptable and against the values of an inclusive, tolerant and multicultural community.”

The Victorian Liberal Party has been in turmoil since upper house MP Moira Deeming attended the anti-trans rally in March, which neo-Nazis also attended. Deeming was ultimately expelled from the parliamentary party on Friday after she threatened to sue Pesutto over her earlier suspension for attending the anti-trans rally where neo-Nazis were present.

Pesutto and Southwick said they would work with the Victorian government to ban the Nazi salute, as Labor has already pledged, and thanked police for dealing with “a deplorable situation of inexcusable behaviour”.

Spring Street had been closed to traffic on Saturday as word spread on social media this week of both the anti-immigration protest and a counter-protest.

Police and neo-Nazis spilled onto the road after clashing on the steps.

Counter-protesters arriving at Spring Street saw the neo-Nazi group being moved onto Fitzroy Gardens, doing the Nazi salute and chanting “no Jewish power”.

About 30 anti-fascist protesters arrived at Fitzroy Gardens at 12.25pm to counter-protest the neo-Nazi presence in the gardens. The counter-protest group swelled to about 50 people as the day wore on.

Police officers moved the counter-protest to the opposite side of Lansdowne Street, while the group chanted “f-ck off Nazis” and “you’ll always lose in Melbourne”.

Police repeatedly moved counter-protesters across the road and moved the mounted branch into the park at 12.35pm.

“Today’s protest involved many different opposing groups and our core focus was to ensure safety, prevent clashes, and de-escalate any violent behaviour,” a police statement said.

One officer was treated at the scene for pepper-spray exposure.

Victoria Police declared the CBD and the parliament gardens a designated area between 7am and 7pm on Saturday, giving officers the power to search any people, their possessions and cars in the area for weapons.

Police said this designation helped defuse the situation.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/two-arrested-as-neo-nazi-group-clashes-with-police-at-victorian-parliament-20230513-p5d84b.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840662

File: 8e019cd6973ddc9⋯.jpg (1.45 MB,4000x2668,1000:667,Chrissie_Sometimes_it_feel….jpg)

>>18784957

>>18784972

‘It’s probably easier to stay in the anger than to be vulnerable’

Chrissie Foster, 67, fought the Catholic Church with her late husband Anthony for two decades after two of their three daughters were raped by their priest. Their youngest, Aimee, 38, escaped the abuse but not the fallout.

Susan Horsburgh - May 12, 2023

1/2

Chrissie: I was dealing with three girls under four after Aimee was born – and postnatal depression. It probably did affect our bonding as emotionally I wasn’t there for about nine months. But Aimee was a joyous child; she always wrote me love notes and gave me hugs.

The disintegration of her sisters’ lives was devastating: Emma became a drug addict at 14 and Katie was hit by a car [at 15, causing her to need full-time care from then on]. Every day for a year, Aimee caught the train after school to visit Katie in hospital. I probably didn’t [talk enough about emotions with the girls] because I wasn’t brought up that way; no one gave us an instruction book.

Aimee was unhappy because Emma got away with too much – but it was either put up with what we wouldn’t normally, or lose Emma. Aimee ran away when she was about 15. She was just sick of it all, I think. But after a day or two, I guessed where she was.

We’ve been through so much, and I admire Aimee for getting over all these issues. Some people might drink or take up some bad habit to escape, but she didn’t. She’s found her centre in spirituality. I had that with religion and I’ve wiped it. I was 40 when I said my first swear word, when all this abuse came up. Now my favourite word is “f-ck“. It feels good to say it.

The change in me was instant [in March 1996, when Emma’s abuse was discovered]. Emma was suicidal and I went from that trauma to taking up arms against the men who’d done this. These arseholes pretend they represent God and they’re raping kids with impunity. [The Church] just moved paedophile priests on to another place where they re-offended; they did that with our guy for 50 years. In [my latest book] Still Standing, I document the irrefutable truth of what they are. It has been cathartic.

In 2017, I was at Aimee’s house; Anthony had gone to Bunnings. Aimee rang him, he didn’t answer. Then she rang again and an ambulance officer answered. That’s how we found out [he’d collapsed from a heart attack and hit his head]. Aimee helped no end, visiting Anthony with me when he was on life support, being there when we viewed his body, arranging his funeral. We lived through it together.

Sometimes it feels like too much, but I force myself to hope because there’s always love and someone to look after, like Katie, Aimee and the grandchildren. You can’t be devoured by disaster. What’s happened to Aimee’s sisters is heartbreaking, but we have fun together. I’m lucky to have two grandchildren and they’re such a joy: a step into the future. I’ve lost so much but Aimee’s a shining light in my life.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840667

File: c6113661cef4c7c⋯.jpg (250.95 KB,1600x900,16:9,Abuse_victims_advocate_Ant….jpg)

>>18840662

2/2

Aimee: Mum is stoic – and fierce. I look at what we’ve been through, and she’s never crashed into a depression. That blows my mind. I guess she’s had her focus of fighting the Catholic Church, but because there’s not the big lows, there’s also not the big highs. I know she cares about her grandkids and enjoys seeing them, but it’s in small pieces, never overnight. [This emotional distance] is her personality; she was like that with us, too. And she doesn’t cry; it’s probably easier to stay in the anger and fight than to be vulnerable and feel what’s really there.

Mum turned against the church and God when she found out what happened to my sisters. She started finding like-minded people, other victims. They’d come over and be angry. I remember hearing my mum swear for the first time; I thought, “That’s not my mum.” The fight took her away from me when it was already a hard time, and the resentment has stayed with me. I’d try to express my frustration, but Dad would shut me down. I felt very alone. Mum and I didn’t really have any meaningful chats until I was in my 20s. We had some family therapy sessions when I was 10, but no one spoke.

Emma was 14 and had been acting out before we found out about the abuse. She had anorexia and started self-harming and overdosing. I was so upset because I really loved my big sister; she became someone else entirely and it was a big loss. I was 10 and I’d see Emma with her wrists slit. Once I came home and the ambos were trying to save her from a heroin overdose at 16. I think Mum was numb from it all.

An hour or so after Emma came to, we went back to a wedding at our neighbours’ place and I felt angry that we were acting as if nothing had happened. Emma descended further and further [and died of suicide in 2008, age 26; Aimee was 22].

Katie had her accident in 1999, when I was 14. She came home after a year in hospital and we had carers in our house all day. Mum and Dad always did the overnight shift and it was like having a newborn again. But I never saw Mum crying or frustrated. She wasn’t loving and soft, but she wasn’t intolerant or asking herself, “How on earth am I going to do this?” She just kept going.

Writing books gives Mum a purpose and releases some of the anger. But I haven’t really read them. Over the last six years, I’ve become quite spiritual. I’ve learnt that I was living in the past, and now I’ve got the ability to dig deeper and tap into my resilience. Mum was a full-blown Catholic, having priests around for dinner, and now she doesn’t believe in God, whereas I do. She hasn’t tried to change my mind or put me down for it. I admire that non-judgment and support.

I call her all the time and we chat, chat, chat away; there’s a comfort there. I share more with her than with anybody else. Mum loves champagne, and we’re going to France in July on a champagne tour. I love making her cack herself. She just loses the plot; she goes silent with a big, wide mouth, nostrils flaring. That’s my expertise with her – making her laugh.

If you or anyone you know needs support, call the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/it-s-probably-easier-to-stay-in-the-anger-than-to-be-vulnerable-20230405-p5cyf7.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840746

File: 9c335d6aa0933ac⋯.jpg (216.56 KB,1620x1080,3:2,More_than_10_000_people_ha….jpg)

File: de88d4a07bc29e8⋯.jpg (1.06 MB,3333x5000,3333:5000,_Chloe_gave_evidence_at_th….jpg)

File: 9aadc1094466c27⋯.jpg (275.49 KB,1901x1078,1901:1078,Greg_Tucker_told_the_inqui….jpg)

The biggest takeaways from the Disability Royal Commission after four years of hearings

Nas Campanella and Evan Young - 13 May 2023

1/2

WARNING: This story contains content that readers may find distressing, including references to sexual assault.

Sexual assaults in the home and by carers.

Children being removed from their mothers immediately after birth.

Forced sterilisation.

Getting paid $2.50 an hour for manual work.

These are just some of the many disturbing accounts heard by the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability over the last four and a half years.

For many in the disability community, these stories did not come as a surprise - they're well aware of the violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation they face.

But with the four-year inquiry wrapping up its final public hearing this week, they want the wider Australian community to know about it, too.

And they want everyone to know these situations are not confined to history - they are still happening today.

Carers are meant to help you - not sexually assault you

Allegations of physical and sexual assaults of people with disability came up numerous times during the royal commission.

But perhaps the most shocking was heard in March 2022, when a Queensland woman who lives with cerebral palsy told the royal commission she was raped, beaten and "treated like a dog" by a paid personal assistant.

Chloe (not her real name) told the hearing into violence against women and girls with disabilities she was repeatedly raped by the man, fell pregnant and then lost the baby in one of the attacks in 2016.

She also said he burned cigarettes around her vagina, and used her phone and bank card.

The royal commission heard after an investigation the personal assistant was charged with multiple counts of rape, grievous bodily harm, torture and assault, but found not guilty.

"[The jury] saw me as disabled and a liar. They believed him because he's not disabled," Chloe said.

Ninety per cent of women with intellectual disability have experienced sexual abuse, the royal commission heard in 2021.

Home should be a safe space - but that isn't the case for many with disability

Group homes are residences that aim to provide disadvantaged people with structured, supervised care and accommodation.

Some 17,000 people in Australia live in group homes, and most of those people live with intellectual disability, according to documents provided to the royal commission.

But often residents are not able to choose where they live, who they live with, what they eat or what they do.

And it's not always safe for them.

Over the years, the royal commission has heard of residents in group homes being physically and sexually assaulted, found with unexplained bruising and kept in "large caged areas".

In 2021, it heard a female resident living with cerebral palsy and intellectual disability had allegedly been indecently and sexually assaulted by a support worker at a northern NSW home.

A police investigation in 2015 led to charges of aggravated indecent assault of a person with physical disability and sexual intercourse with a person with cognitive impairment, but the worker was found not guilty.

Babies have been removed at birth from mothers with disability

Thelma Schwartz, of the Queensland Indigenous Family Violence Legal Service, told the royal commission in 2020 she'd witnessed the removal of babies from mothers with disability in the birthing suite.

"I would call it a heinous practice," she told a hearing into First Nations people with disabilities and their interactions with the child protection system.

The Torres Strait Islander woman said the child protection system was stacked against First Nations women with disabilities and she'd dealt with removal in multiple generations of individual families.

Commissioner Ronald Sackville remarked that material from that week's hearing had the "resonance of the Stolen Generations".

The forcible sterilisation of women and girls with disability and their reproductive rights were also raised during public hearings.

While a hearing in 2021 was told about a lack of data on forcible sterilisation, Women with Disabilities Australia's Carolyn Frohmader shared some alarming anecdotes.

"We have some members who were told they were having their appendix taken out and didn't even know [they'd been sterilised] until they wanted to have children," she said.

"We've got members who were sterilised at the age of seven because they had a mild vision impairment."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18840753

File: ac2dd08f714cbbd⋯.jpg (91.61 KB,1039x575,1039:575,Debra_Keenahan_said_she_d_….jpg)

File: 5c3fa7d4a0c457a⋯.jpg (108 KB,971x593,971:593,Carly_Findlay_said_she_s_r….jpg)

>>18840746

2/2

It's legal to pay someone with disability less than $2.50 an hour

In April 2022, the royal commission heard the story of a man in Victoria with intellectual disability who'd been doing manual work in a warehouse.

"At the end of the day … I'm always really exhausted and [have] a bit of a sore back," Greg Tucker said.

Mr Tucker said he'd been getting paid $2.50 an hour for his efforts.

It was all completely legal.

That's because Mr Tucker was working at an Australian disability enterprise (ADE). Previously known as sheltered workshops, ADEs provide employment for people with moderate to severe disability, separate from the mainstream workforce.

The inquiry heard those working in ADEs could legally be paid as little as $2.37 an hour.

About 600 ADEs - some of them multi-million-dollar businesses - compete for work in industries such as laundry, packing and cleaning. Together, they employ some 20,000 people with disability.

The week he gave evidence, Mr Tucker said his wage was soon going to rise to $8 an hour.

He told the royal commission he was too scared to ask for a boost that would take him closer to the minimum wage, which today sits at $21.38.

Advocates said no other Australian would accept that sort of pay and called for the government to fix wages for people with disability in ADEs.

'Just the right height for a blow job'

October 2022 saw the royal commission turn its attention to abuse, violence and harassment against people with disability in public places.

People with disability regularly face questions from strangers about how they became disabled or how they do a particular activity.

But the royal commission heard that for many, the intrusions are horrific.

"I have had a hand coming down the front of my top, grabbing my breast. I have had comments saying having intercourse with me would be like having sex with a child," said Debra Keenahan, who is short of stature.

"Comments like 'you are just at the right height for a … blow job' or 'while you're down there, love' - that's a classic one."

The inquiry also heard of incidents where other people of short stature had been lifted off the ground by strangers, laughed at and photographed without their consent.

Carly Findlay - a disability advocate who lives with a rare skin condition called icthyosis - said she could not think of a single day when she had not been "mocked, laughed at or questioned" about her appearance outside her home.

The abuse also occurs online, she said, recalling an experience when her photo was shared and ridiculed widely on discussion forum website Reddit.

"People said things like, 'what does your vagina look like?', 'what the f*ck is that? It looks like something that was partially digested by my dog','" she said.

"They described me as a lobster. They said that I should be killed with fire."

What happens now?

We wait for the final report, which is set to be handed down in September.

The royal commission was brought about after years of advocacy by the disability community.

It's resulted in more than 10,000 people sharing their stories in public hearings, submissions or private sessions.

The inquiry held 33 public hearings and travelled to every state and territory in the country collecting evidence, much of it difficult to hear and even more difficult to recount.

After all that, the disability community hopes the final report will make recommendations that bring about long-lasting change.

"We need to stop the abuse that is still happening," said disability advocate Leigh Creighton, who lives with Down syndrome.

"We need to make society more inclusive."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-13/disability-royal-commission-biggest-stories/102326830

https://disability.royalcommission.gov.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844628

File: de46789e440bc4d⋯.jpg (125.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Trade_Minister_Don_Farrell….jpg)

File: 6e9d31c5cd65a64⋯.jpg (103.44 KB,768x1024,3:4,Trade_Minister_Don_Farrell….jpg)

>>18835358

China hails ‘substantial progress’ on trade ties with Australia

BEN PACKHAM - MAY 14, 2023

China says “substantial progress” has been made on stabilising trade ties with Australia during high-level ministerial talks and the country is willing to work towards “more positive results”.

But Beijing continues to push for improved investment access in key areas, including critical minerals, and wants Australia’s support to gain entry to the trans-Pacific trade partnership.

Trade Minister Don Farrell returned from a two-day trip to China without concessions from counterpart Wang Wentao on the country’s $20bn worth of trade bans against Australian exports, but said he was encouraged at the positive direction of negotiations.

In a weekend statement issued after the ministers’ late Friday meeting, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said Beijing would work with Australia on resolving the nations’ trade disputes.

“The Chinese side is willing to work with the Australian side to jointly expand more areas of co-operation, and hopes that the Australian side can provide a good business environment and treat Chinese companies and products fairly and justly,” it said.

The Ministry said the meeting “sent an important signal for the improvement of Australia-China relations, and also heralded the stable development of bilateral economic and trade cooperation”.

Wentao accepted an invitation during the talks to visit Senator Farrell’s Clare Valley vineyard at a yet-to-be decided time, in a sign of the growing personal relationship between the pair, and Beijing’s willingness to set the bilateral relationship on a more positive path.

During the talks, Mr Wang “noted” Senator Farrell’s call for detained Australian citizens Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun to be freed.

The Albanese government wants the Australians to be released ahead of a likely China trip by Anthony Albanese later this year.

Senator Farrell said the meeting represented an important step forward in resolving the trade issues between the countries.

“I achieved what I came here for - to find a pathway to resolve the remaining trade impediments,” he said.

Senator Farrell said Minister Wang confirmed China’s expedited review of its barley tariffs against Australia was on track, and “I reaffirmed that we expect a similar process to be followed to remove trade barriers for Australian wine”.

China slapped punishing tariffs on Australian exports including barley, beef, wine, lobster, coal and timber in 2020, after the Morrison government called for an inquiry into the origins of Covid-19.

China recently agreed to review the barley bans in response to the suspension of a World Trade Organisation challenge by Australia, setting a course for the sanctions on the commodity to be lifted, together with those on wine.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/china-hails-substantial-progress-on-trade-ties-with-australia/news-story/8240eb6fbd38347712aad841f9d625ef

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844640

File: ee45b9839fa6ebe⋯.jpg (354.09 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Australian_Minister_for_Tr….jpg)

File: 6290ddb35bc1a51⋯.jpg (168.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,Trade_Minister_Don_Farrell….jpg)

File: 2dcb4cf4a7cc284⋯.jpg (372.39 KB,1941x1668,647:556,These_were_my_June_2020_gu….jpg)

>>18835358

>>18844628

Trick of the trade? China ‘ramping up the pressure’

The truth is we don’t know when - or even if - China will remove tariffs and imposts on Australian imports.

WILL GLASGOW - May 14, 2023

1/2

It is a pointed reminder of the gulf between China’s talk and Australia’s reality.

Ahead of Don Farrell‘s two-day trip to Beijing, speculation was rife that Australian live lobsters would be again allowed to legally enter what had been their dominant market.

In January, China’s top diplomat in West Australia visited Geraldton Fishermen’s Co-operative. Rumours raced around the industry: were the fat years about to return?

Five months on and not only has the unofficial black-listing not ended – China’s customs officials have clamped down on what had been a roaring illicit trade smuggled through Hong Kong and Taiwan.

“They are ramping up the pressure on Australia,” says one senior figure in the lobster industry.

There have been some boosterist predictions, but the truth is we don’t know when - or even if - China will remove the full range of tariffs and imposts on Australian imports previously worth more than $20 billion a year.

Many of the South Korean exports caught up in Beijing’s 2016 THAAD tantrum remain banned.

Australian coal has been allowed back, but ending it was hardly an act of charity. It was the biggest part of China’s coercion campaign - and the one that most obviously backfired. The ban put a huge cost on China’s steelmakers and, according to China-based energy analysts, contributed to at least two huge blackouts.

An unofficial ban on copper has also ended, although you might not have noticed it ever started. China doesn’t pay a premium on copper, so it had next to zero impact on Australian producers. It seems to have been allowed to trade again ahead of Trade Minister Farrell’s visit to send a “positive signal”.

The visiting Australian minister’s tour of the Forbidden City continued the charm offensive. He was even lucky enough to not be followed around that magnificent UNESCO listed site by two plain clothes security agents, as happened to me when I last visited in June 2020. It’s a different country if you have journalist (“jizhe”) stamped in your passport.

The key banned products discussed on Friday by Senator Farrell and China’s Minister of Commerce Minister Wang Wentao were lobster, timber, barley and wine.

Senator Farrell was told Beijing’s review of its 80 per cent tariff on Australian barley was “on track”.

He made it clear that Canberra wants an end to China’s more-than-200 per cent impost on Australian wine. Like barley, it is the subject of a case in the WTO.

The outlook for lobsters and timber, two China-dependent industries roiled by Beijing, remain in the hands of the Chinese gods, or rather, Xi Jinping.

Farrell left upbeat: “I achieved what I came here for - to find a pathway to resolve the remaining trade impediments.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844643

File: fd701eb5d93bae3⋯.jpg (100.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,Trade_and_Tourism_Minister….jpg)

File: 6b59b5d62b52b5f⋯.jpg (104.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Trade_and_Tourism_Minister….jpg)

File: afeddb17af34d79⋯.jpg (156.98 KB,768x1024,3:4,Trade_Minister_Don_Farrell….jpg)

>>18844640

2/2

If normal market access is returned, the Albanese government will deserve much praise, but we should hold the applause until the Chinese follow through.

China’s Foreign and Commerce Ministries were upbeat and respectful in their remarks about the visiting Australian minister. That is a welcome change.

But the Global Times was less soothing: “China has no interest in changing Australia‘s foreign policy, which views the US as its closest ally. But its following of the US to see China as a security threat and crack down on China is not what we can turn a blind eye to. This is the root cause why China-Australia relations encountered difficulties.”

The party-state mouthpiece pointed to Australia’s AUKUS deal to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, which it described as a military plan to “contain and provoke confrontations with China”.

“How could Australia play the dual role as China‘s close economic friend and strategic security enemy at the same time?”

That question looms over all Australian businesses engaged in China. So do Beijing’s recently enlarged anti-espionage laws.

Fortunately for Australia, most of our exports to China are in strategic resources (iron ore, LNG, lithium, etc), which Beijing can only block at great cost to itself. It’s why Australian exports to China hit a record $180b in 2021, despite Beijing’s trade coercion campaign against the Morrison government.

Almost 90 per cent of that record loot were minerals, fuels and gold: an enviable profile when you are selling to a giant customer with a predilection for trade warfare. But it’s no comfort for Australian farmers, the most exposed to Beijing.

Our farmers have had some recent good China news in addition to the Trade Minister’s trip. Canada’s relationship with China keeps getting worse.

Beijing has threatened “strong reactions” after Ottawa last week revoked the credentials of a Chinese diplomat caught up in a foreign interference scandal. Canada, a fellow US ally and agricultural powerhouse, exports many of the same goods to China that Australia does.

Its fishermen have been one of the biggest beneficiaries of China’s Australian lobster ban. Might that be reversed?

“The Chinese are very good at manipulating,” observes a lobster exporter with decades of experience selling to our biggest trading partner.

If their fat years do return, our lobster exporters may owe Justin Trudeau nearly as much thanks as the Albanese government.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/trick-of-the-trade-china-ramping-up-the-pressure-on-australia/news-story/af9a7b2dc13edf627acf3052a1ea3de0

https://twitter.com/wmdglasgow/status/1657624940663947269

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844670

File: 184997f19258e53⋯.jpg (1.22 MB,4032x2268,16:9,Daniel_Hayes_and_his_lawye….jpg)

File: 5aba8d80c4abd35⋯.jpg (52.38 KB,379x516,379:516,Mark_Heaney_has_denied_the….jpg)

Former Melbourne Demons footballer Daniel Hayes serves Supreme Court writ on AFL and junior coach Mark Heaney

Bec Symons - 12 May 2023

1/3

The miracle of Daniel Hayes's life on and off the football field is that he is still here to tell his story.

It was 17 years ago when the Aboriginal small forward from the Melbourne suburb of Montrose was forging a path to football fame, recruited into the AFL by the Melbourne Football Club among a draft class that would play hundreds of league games between them.

The attributes Hayes possessed were prized by any club: speed, agility - he was among the top 2 per cent of performers in the latter category at the AFL draft camp - and the priceless ability to kick goals in big games.

As a 17-year-old "bottom-age" player, he kicked five goals in the Eastern Ranges' 2005 semifinal victory in the TAC Cup - the AFL's elite junior competition from which the cream of each year's teenage footballers are recruited into the professional game.

John Lamont was the head coach of the Eastern Ranges during Hayes's time with the club. He remembers a player of rich potential.

"Hayesy had real AFL attributes - he was skilful, light on his feet with a good turn of speed," Lamont says.

"He could change direction with good sideways lateral movement, good evasive skills and clean hands. They're all AFL attributes.

"So, that's why when I first met him, I just sort of said, 'He needs to be in our program.'"

However, for all his talent and potential, Hayes would never feature in a single senior AFL game for the Demons.

At the time, media and fans put it down to the "commitment issues" label so often thoughtlessly applied to Indigenous players who do not thrive in the high-stakes world of big-time football.

None could have fathomed the feelings Hayes was grappling with.

'That's something I'm holding on to'

In a Victorian Supreme Court writ served on the AFL and former Eastern Ranges' assistant coach Mark Heaney this week by Daniel Hayes's lawyers, Arnold Thomas Becker, Hayes alleged that, following a boozy post-game barbecue at the home of Heaney, he was "raped" by Heaney after other guests had left.

The court documents allege that: "As a result of the abuse, [Daniel Hayes] self-medicated with drugs and alcohol. He has made three suicide attempts" and "but for the abuse, [Daniel Hayes] would have continued with the Melbourne Demons".

In response to questions from the ABC about Hayes's allegation, Heaney said: "I deny that. I had a professional relationship with him as a trainee and player."

Nine years after the events alleged in the claim - by which time Heaney was an AFL employee playing a crucial role in the code's New South Wales expansion - Heaney pleaded guilty to one count of using a carriage service to groom a child under the age of 16 for sex, and was jailed for a year.

Seeing media reports of Heaney's disgrace filled Hayes with feelings of sickness and guilt that he had not made his own allegations earlier.

"I felt bad, like maybe if I had said something earlier … that's something I'm holding on to," Hayes says.

"I should have come out and said it when it happened. I should have come out and told people."

Hayes's complaint is now the subject of a new Victoria Police investigation.

'My dream was to play AFL footy'

That Daniel Hayes had even clung on to his football dream until the 2006 AFL draft was a miracle in itself.

For much of his childhood, Hayes had tried to make the best out of bad situations that were beyond his control.

Separated from his mother for long periods, he was raised by his foster parents, Helen and Arch Daniel.

"Arch was the main one to take me to footy training, to pick me up from school," Hayes says.

"Nan [Helen] would do everything else. I couldn't say a bad word about them. I loved them."

He was a quiet, shy kid who lived for sport and his gifts were obvious.

To Helen, football must have seemed like a lifeline for Daniel and the goal of a professional career something positive for all the family to work towards.

"I was that one kid [who] slept with a footy, [who] did everything with a footy," Hayes says.

"I used to eat my dinner with peas and set up goal squares.

"My dream was to play AFL footy."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844674

File: ecda8bcc9a9f409⋯.jpg (743.48 KB,1801x3000,1801:3000,Daniel_Hayes_at_the_Rising….jpg)

File: c17f873680e3e53⋯.jpg (630.28 KB,2108x3073,2108:3073,Daniel_Hayes_during_an_Int….jpg)

>>18844670

2/3

In a self-published book of her life that covered those times, Helen wrote of Heaney and Ranges head coach John Lamont as "angels" who were "supporting Daniel towards his dream".

She did not know of the allegations at the time, nor did she imagine that, two decades later, Daniel would be suing Heaney and the AFL.

'I blame myself for it every single day'

For the past 17 years, Daniel Hayes's most formidable opponent has been the mental ill health that affects almost every aspect of his life.

"I've got anger-management issues," Hayes says.

"I've been into rehab. I've been on every single tablet.

"I've tried to end my life three times."

In his late teens, Daniel hid his feelings and few seemed to notice the warning signs that his mental health was deteriorating.

From state selection as a bottom-age player, Hayes was almost a non-starter in his senior year in the TAC Cup.

He found any excuse not to play, he now admits, featuring in only five of the Ranges' games in 2006.

"By then, I was faking injuries because I didn't want to be around the club," Hayes says.

Having slid down the pecking order to AFL rookie list selection, his early days with the Demons were characterised by disappearing acts and club-imposed suspensions.

At one point, struggling to cope, he missed training to visit his mother in Bairnsdale.

"I just wanted to go back home with family and Mum. That's all I wanted to do," Hayes says.

"I finally made it back to Bairnsdale and I saw an article in the Herald Sun about me missing training.

"I was pretty shocked. I thought, being a young guy and a new player, no-one knew me, so it was more disappointing because they didn't know what was going on with me."

He believes he may have worked through his mental health challenges back then if then-AFL players had the mental health support structures they do now.

"I didn't know how to cope with it," Hayes says.

"I wish I was in AFL now because there's way more help for people to come out and ask for it.

"Back then, if you were struggling, you had to deal with it, like, 'Come on.'"

As quickly as he arrived on the AFL scene, he disappeared, turning his back on football and entering a world of alcohol, drugs and self-destruction.

"I gave it away," he says.

"I blame myself for it every single day.

"It was meant to be the best time of my life, something to strive for. I started hurting people after that day. I started pushing them away."

His inevitable delisting from the Demons instantly changed his outlook on life.

"My first week after I got delisted from Melbourne, I went partying and I hit the drugs," he says.

"I'd never hit the drugs in my life before that night, but I abused my body."

'I need help. I need to fix myself'

With no guard rails in place, and his football dream over, Hayes says drug use and mental illness blighted his post-AFL years, not just hindering his ability to get and keep a job but to hold a growing family together.

Hayes has five children, four of whom he says he doesn't see, so acute have been his personal problems.

"When I hit the drugs, we lost our kids," Hayes says.

His youngest daughter with his current partner lives two hours away with a kinship carer.

"We travel every fortnight to pick her up. We see her for two days and that's it," he says.

"I need help. I need to fix myself and there's no day I don't think about wanting to see my kids."

Since leaving the Demons, Hayes has tried his hand at a few jobs, working in cultural heritage, traffic control, plastering and at an abattoir.

However, he says, his depression comes in such devastating and regular cycles that he can't keep a job for longer than a few months.

"I can't get a stable house or hold a stable job," Hayes says.

"The same circle goes on with me: I get in two months of work, then I want to quit, so I don't answer my phone. My depression is bad."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844677

File: b141144b1835684⋯.jpg (769.34 KB,2227x3000,2227:3000,Daniel_Hayes_during_a_Melb….jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>18844674

3/3

In an ideal world, he would be financially secure and basking in the afterglow of a glittering AFL career.

Instead, he says, he is sometimes so debilitated by his personal problems that he goes days without eating.

"I don't do anything these days," Hayes admits.

"I've got no friends. I've only got my family and my partner."

"I just feel sorry for my kids and my partner."

In recent years, football has been one of the few positive forces in his life.

This year, Hayes is assistant coach of Swifts Creek, following stints with Trafalgar, Paynesville, Wy Yung, Orbost, Lakes Entrance, Barwon Heads, Mooroopna, Morwell East and Ellinbank.

"Footy is everything to me, for my mental health," Hayes says.

"It helps me with being out there for a couple of hours with mates, trying to achieve something at the end of the year, being part of something, a brotherhood."

However, here, too, there is a caveat.

Despite his love of the game, and the relief it can provide to an overburdened mind, Hayes says his depression has thrown entire seasons off-track, hence the long list of clubs.

"It sort of goes up and down," Hayes says.

"When I do have depression, I don't tell the footy club."

"I don't give them an explanation, I just leave."

'I'm an Aboriginal man who has been looking for help for years'

In 2020, like so many Victorians feeling the strain and uncertainty of lockdowns, Hayes reached a personal crisis point.

"I hit rock bottom," he says.

After spending 19 days in a mental health facility, Hayes finally talked to his family about his state of mind.

"I spoke to Mum, and my younger sister in Bairnsdale and there were a lot of tears," Hayes says.

"I'm an Aboriginal man who has been looking for help for years now and no-one seems to be helping."

By sharing his story, Daniel hopes to empower others to share theirs.

"With my voice now, I hope I'll be a good role model for everyone [who] wants to come out with their story," he says.

However, without a stable job, he and his partner battle to pay the bills and get by.

"I'm struggling," he says.

"For someone to be living off payments once a fortnight … no one can live off that.

"I'm hoping to get a stable house for me and my partner. It's going to help me, because I want to start fresh and, by starting fresh, I can maybe start again with my kids down the road."

Importantly, he is beginning to conquer tasks within his control, getting himself clean of drugs and seeking counselling.

"If I go down that road again, I don't think I'll come out of it," Hayes says.

"I'm pushing myself so I can get myself better."

Do you have more information about this story? Contact Bec Symons at symons.bec@abc.net.au

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-12/daniel-hayes-supreme-court-writ-mark-heaney/102328968

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844722

File: 870e18a67501af0⋯.jpg (85.75 KB,862x575,862:575,Former_Demons_player_Danie….jpg)

File: 5ee0483c2546a4f⋯.jpg (84.18 KB,862x485,862:485,Mark_Heaney_in_an_image_fr….jpg)

>>18844670

Court documents reveal coach accused of raping former Melbourne player Daniel Hayes was a long-time AFL employee who coached Sydney Swans academy teams

Russell Jackson and Bec Symons - 13 May 2023

1/4

A former elite junior football coach has been accused by former AFL player Daniel Hayes of rape back in 2005 and a writ has been lodged in the Victorian Supreme Court seeking damages.

Mark Patrick Heaney was a senior AFL employee who played a crucial role in the code's expansion into New South Wales and coached Sydney Swans academy teams for three years.

Heaney, who was the AFL's Northern New South Wales regional manager between 2009 and 2013, lost his job with the league in 2014 when he was convicted and jailed for grooming a 13-year-old junior footballer in 2013.

Warning: This story includes text messages including graphic sexual content.

Between 2004 and 2008, and at the time of the alleged incident, Heaney was an assistant coach and regional development manager for the Eastern Ranges team in the AFL's TAC Cup (now the Coates Talent League) Under-18s competition.

In response to questions from the ABC about Hayes's allegation in the writ, Heaney said: "I deny that. I had a professional relationship with him as a trainee and player."

The court document alleges that "As a result of the abuse [Daniel Hayes] self-medicated with drugs and alcohol. He has made three suicide attempts and been admitted to rehabilitation for alcohol and drug dependence."

Hayes has also made a complaint to Victoria Police over the alleged incident and this is the source of an ongoing criminal investigation.

A coach who 'ticked all the boxes'

On his personal website, Mark Heaney describes himself as "Lismore born, Brisbane raised. Reader, runner, kayaker and horse-racing owner" and says he now works in "health — pathology".

But in the mid-2000s, when he was based in Victoria, Heaney was working his way into the ranks of elite junior football coaching.

It was while working as a PE teacher, year-level coordinator and director of sport between 2000 and 2008 at Mount Lilydale Mercy College, in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne, that Heaney became involved in the AFL's elite Under-18 football system.

A spokesperson for Melbourne Archdiocese Catholic Schools confirmed to the ABC that Heaney took leave without pay from Mount Lilydale Mercy College in 2005 to take up a role with AFL Victoria (then Football Victoria) and formally resigned from the school in November 2005. Heaney returned to the school in 2007 and served as director of sport until the end of 2008.

The statement continued: "No formal complaints were received by the school in relation to Mr Heaney."

Melbourne Archdiocese Catholic Schools also confirmed that Mount Lilydale Mercy College has not been the subject of civil litigation or National Redress claims related to Heaney's tenure.

"However," the statement continued, "records show [Heaney] was spoken to by the Principal in 2008 about keeping appropriate professional boundaries with regards to student communication and interactions."

In response to questions from the ABC, Heaney said: "I had a meeting but it was not about anything inappropriate.

"It was in the early days of social messaging and a few students I also coached externally. The principal discussed the need to maintain professionalism as they were both students and players on an external team I coached."

Between 2005 and 2008, Heaney was an assistant coach and part-time AFL Victoria regional development manager at the Eastern Ranges, spending 2006 in a similar role at the Murray Bushrangers, based in Wangaratta, before returning to coach Under-15s and Under-18s at the Ranges in 2007.

Both clubs competed in the TAC Cup (now the Coates Talent League), the premier AFL junior competition from which the best junior players are drafted to league clubs.

In a statement provided to the ABC, an AFL spokesman said: "The AFL takes these matters extremely seriously and is not aware of any reports or complaints of misconduct to the AFL regarding Mark Heaney from 2005."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844724

File: c08173e2bf5180c⋯.jpg (76.95 KB,984x738,4:3,Mark_Heaney_denied_the_all….jpg)

File: 0ed5d0b78b0ca58⋯.jpg (1.65 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_TAC_Cup_where_Heaney_s….jpg)

>>18844722

2/4

Former Eastern Ranges players who spoke to the ABC said Heaney was a likeable man who "ticked all the boxes" as a role model.

His role with the Ranges involved a lot of out-of-hours work supporting players, including driving them to and from training and games, and making home visits. He was also responsible for administrating the AFL's AusKick clinics in Melbourne's eastern suburbs.

Former Ranges head coach John Lamont told the ABC he'd been unaware of the charges Heaney faced in 2013 and was shocked by Hayes's allegations against Heaney. Lamont said that neither he nor then-Ranges development manager Ian Flack had received complaints about Heaney during or after his time with the Ranges.

'The role is on the AFL payroll, but the extra effort Mark puts in outside his paid position is greatly appreciated'

Heaney's time as a Melbourne-based football coach ended in January of 2009, when the then-37-year-old was appointed as the AFL's regional manager for Northern New South Wales.

Heaney was to play a crucial role in the AFL's strategy to expand into rugby league heartlands and convert junior sporting stars from other codes into Australian Rules players.

Heaney would eventually manage an expanding small team of development officers whose job was to increase participation in the AFL's entry-level AusKick program, support the expansion of junior leagues and drive school participation.

"The development officers have got a pretty good plan set-up for the first term so we're getting into the schools," Heaney told the Coffs Coast Advocate in 2009.

"The big thing this year is to make sure that the work in the schools flows onto kids playing with the clubs."

At the time, Heaney was roundly praised for commitment to the AFL cause. "New AFL regional manager Mark Heaney is already making his mark on the local game with his enthusiasm and organisation," said one local newspaper editorial.

"The role is on the AFL payroll, but the extra effort Mark puts in outside his paid position is greatly appreciated."

Grafton, one of the regional hubs in Heaney's territory, soon experienced "unprecedented interest" in AFL AusKick, with participation increasing by 300 per cent.

In addition to his administrative duties, Heaney was soon coaching players in the AFL's NSW/ACT Talent Academy and Northern Heat junior representative teams whose players vied for state selection from Under 14s through to Under 18s

It was also Heaney's job to coordinate school visits by AFL players and coaches from the Sydney Swans, and Heaney used his links to Hawthorn football club to offer a select band of junior players from Coffs Harbour the opportunity to train with the Hawks.

"Probably that's been driven by Mark Heaney who obviously has got some links with the Hawks as he used to coach with the Eastern Ranges back there so we're only too happy to help out where we can," a Hawthorn assistant said at the time.

'Heaney and Roos will form a working partnership'

In 2011, Heaney's crucial role in the AFL's expansion plans was cemented with the establishment of a Sydney Swans North Coast academy in Coffs Harbour.

Launched by then-Swans coach Paul Roos and Adam Goodes in February of that year, it aimed to fast track the development of junior players in Heaney's north-coast zone. It would offer opportunities to local boys aged between 9 and 18 and Heaney would be in charge of coaching.

"Heaney and Roos will form a working partnership which will inject a massive pool of coaching knowledge into schools and junior clubs," said a local newspaper report of the time.

"The profile and prestige of the academy will be enormous," Heaney added.

"Exactly the same coaching they get in the city is coming here … the Swans are already looking at two local kids, along with another nine who could easily end up on their list. It will go into overdrive even more when the academy starts up.

"The response, the build-up and enormous profile AFL is getting is incredible."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844727

File: f5c859667bd942a⋯.jpg (276.66 KB,1160x1275,232:255,Mark_Heaney_says_on_his_we….jpg)

>>18844724

3/4

In a response to questions from the ABC, a spokesperson from the Sydney Swans confirmed "the Swans Academy employed Mark Heaney on a casual basis from 2011-2013".

Within a year, the first of Heaney's academy players had graduated to the Swans reserves team and Heaney was also overseeing AFL Combine showcases for league recruiters.

Early in 2013, when the AFL and Heaney's rise in northern New South Wales continued apace, the Sydney Swans senior squad spent part of a week-long training camp offering coaching tips to Coffs Coast school children.

"The opportunity to have a kick about with a premiership player is something any footy fan would love to do," Heaney said in 2013.

"Every time the Swans have made the trip up here it has seen more kids signing on to play which is great for the sport."

'That is a disturbing thing'

In mid-May of 2013, the north-coast AFL community was rocked by media reports of Heaney's arrest following a four-week covert investigation by the New South Wales State Crime Command child exploitation internet unit.

The 42-year-old soon appeared in Coffs Harbour local court, charged with using a carriage service to groom a person under 16 and four counts of using a carriage service to transmit indecent communication to persons under 16.

Former Geelong premiership captain Tom Harley, then general manager of AFL New South Wales/ACT, immediately stood Heaney down pending the outcome of court proceedings and called a community forum in Coffs Harbour for 100 concerned parents.

The AFL released a statement saying it was "shocked and appalled by the allegations" and appealed for further information from parents of players who'd played under Heaney.

Likewise, police appealed for more witnesses in Heaney's case.

"Because he is so well known, that is a disturbing thing in relation to this investigation and that's why police have acted quickly yesterday in arresting him, because of his access to children," said State Crime Command child exploitation internet unit team leader Detective Sergeant Richard Long.

But the news caused barely a ripple in Melbourne, with Heaney's coaching colleagues and former players from Eastern Ranges and Murray Bushrangers only hearing of the charges years later.

Likewise in July 2014, when shocking details of the case emerged after Heaney pleaded guilty of one count of using a carriage service to groom a person under 16 years and sentenced to 18 months in jail with a minimum term of 12 months.

In its statement to the ABC, Sydney Swans confirmed that Heaney was "stood down immediately when the charges came to light".

"We take these matters extremely seriously and the AFL Integrity Department was involved from the outset."

In response to questions from the ABC, the AFL would not comment on the findings of its Integrity Department investigation.

'Are you tossing right now?'

The Court heard Heaney had contacted a 13-year-old junior footballer via Facebook messenger and instigated a sexually explicit exchange that lasted until 4.30am.

Heaney sent the boy explicit images of himself, including one in which Heaney was lying naked with his hand over his penis, although Heaney soon urged the child to delete the pictures.

The boy immediately alerted his parents and soon Heaney was unknowingly chatting to an undercover officer from New South Wales Police.

In the chats that followed with the undercover officer, Heaney suggested he and the boy should compare penis sizes. Heaney also suggested a meeting at a hotel he frequented, where he said the pair could have an ejaculation contest.

"Sticking with the sporting theme, I think we'll set up a target and see who can shoot the furthest," Heaney said.

When the undercover officer asked whether there would be physical contact between them, Heaney replied: "We're both footballers, mate. We can handle a bit."

Further messages probed for details of the boy's previous sexual experiences and in one, Heaney asked "Are you tossing right now?"

After accepting that Heaney did not intend to follow through with the suggested hotel room meeting, Justice Wells sent Heaney to prison until July 2015.

Having "withdrawn emotionally" since Heaney had bombarded him with sexual advances, the boy, according to his father, would not play football again.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844728

File: cab64b5bcea2693⋯.jpg (192.9 KB,1126x757,1126:757,Heaney_coached_at_the_Sydn….jpg)

>>18844727

4/4

'A safe, welcoming and inclusive environment'

In a statement to the ABC, an AFL spokesman said: "At the time of Mark Heaney facing charges in 2013, which he was subsequently jailed for, AFL NSW/ACT publicly commented on the matter given Heaney's employment history in football.

"AFL NSW/ACT acknowledged the appalling nature of the charges, offered support and counselling to affected families and individuals and urged anyone with further information to contact police. The AFL confirmed that appropriate background checks were conducted at the time."

The statement said the AFL "has a system in place that enables anyone involved in the game, currently or historically, to make a report related to any allegations that may contravene the AFL's rules and policies, including sexual or physical assault".

"The AFL offers wellbeing support to anyone who has been involved in the game at any level, past or present, and has a team dedicated to integrity, security and child safeguarding matters," the statement said.

"The AFL is committed to providing participants at all levels of the game, from community football through to the elite game, with a safe, welcoming and inclusive environment and is extremely sympathetic and willing to support anyone who has endured wrongdoing in the game at any stage."

Do you have more information about this story? Contact Bec Symons at symons.bec@abc.net.au or Russell Jackson at Jackson.russell@abc.net.au

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-13/afl-employee-daniel-hayes-sydney-swans-academy-rape-allegation/102336506

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844736

Dailymotion embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18844670

Former Demon Daniel Hayes accused assistant coach of rape

ABC NEWS (Australia)

12 May 2023

Our next story may distress some viewers. A former Melbourne Demons rookie is suing the AFL and a former employee claiming in a Victorian Supreme Court writ that he was raped as a 17-year-old in 2005 by his assistant coach at the Eastern Ranges, Mark Heaney. A standout junior Daniel Hayes was drafted by the Demons the following year but never played a game after being cut from the club's list for repeatedly missing training. The writ, which was lodged this week, details his spiral into drug and alcohol abuse and his mental health struggles in the years since his AFL dream ended.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8kvfef

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18844758

File: 0f4fdf8493ba052⋯.mp4 (15.92 MB,640x360,16:9,Former_AFL_player_suing_fo….mp4)

>>18844670

Former Melbourne Demons recruit Daniel Hayes suing AFL, coach over alleged rape as club junior

Mikala Theocharous - May 13, 2023

Warning: This story contains details and content that some readers may find distressing.

A former Melbourne Demons recruit is suing the AFL and a former coach of his from a junior football league, who he alleges sexually assaulted him after a game when he was a teenager.

Daniel Hayes alleges that his former assistant coach of the Eastern Ranges, Mark Heaney, got him drunk and then raped him while Hayes was at a barbeque at Heaney's house when he was 17.

"I put a lot of trust into Mark," Hayes told 9News.

Heaney has publicly denied the claims and no charges have been laid.

Hayes was drafted to the Demons in 2006 following the alleged assault, but was delisted after repeatedly not turning up to training.

The 34-year-old father of five has survived three suicide attempts since the alleged assault and turned to drugs and alcohol to cope.

"I hit rock bottom, I've got five kids who I don't see," he said.

Hayes is suing both Heaney and the AFL as the operator of the Eastern Ranges.

He is seeking financial compensation to cover the earnings he could have made as an AFL player, as well as medical costs to improve his mental health.

"It derailed everything, I walked out of my dream," Hayes said.

His lawyers claim the AFL did not uphold their duty of care to Hayes.

"The AFL had a duty of care to protect Daniel and a duty of care to make sure he was safe while trusting them to help him through his professional career," lawyer Aleksandar Dukovski said.

Hayes says he just wants justice, and to be a voice for other young men who may have gone through a similar thing.

"I blamed myself for most of my life, and I can't do it no more."

Victoria Police says an investigation into the matter remains ongoing.

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

Readers seeking support can contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636.

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.9news.com.au/national/daniel-hayes-former-player-suing-afl-coach-alleged-rape/183aa22e-7041-49b6-a483-98bacd4a9048

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849787

File: 821c809b902c84a⋯.jpg (104.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Victorian_Bar_has_firm….jpg)

File: f1f820b1e411416⋯.jpg (66.69 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Victorian_Bar_president_Sa….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18794875

Victorian Bar: ‘We backed same-sex marriage, we can back the voice’

ELLIE DUDLEY - MAY 15, 2023

The Victorian Bar has firm ground to support the Indigenous voice parliament because it once supported same-sex marriage in the face of the plebiscite, a leaked memorandum urging Bar members to vote Yes in a poll deciding if the association publicly backs the voice suggests.

The 20-page memorandum, sent to all 2200 Bar members, comes as the association gears up for a poll on whether or not it should support the Indigenous voice, and opposing camps start work to convince members to vote their way.

Compiled by the left-wing faction of the Bar and signed off by Peter Hanks KC and Rachel Doyle SC, the memorandum references the fact in 2015, when it came time to make amendments to the Marriage Act, then-president James Peters QC published a press release in favour of same-sex marriage.

That set a precedent for the Bar‘s “clear responsibility” to speak out about proposed legal reform and constitutional change, the memorandum said.

“In commenting on the constitutional change contemplated by the Voice, the Bar would be doing no more than fulfilling a clear community expectation that we use our legal expertise, independence and courage to inform the public debate; that is in the finest traditions of our Bar,” the memorandum read.

“While it may be said that the present public debate has become political, the same can be said of almost all law reform - and particularly constitutional change.”

The memorandum was circulated as part of the process governing the online poll of the Bar members.

The poll came about after the voice divided the institution, and the 21-member Bar Council was forced to put the decision of whether the Bar supported the referendum in the hands of its members, rather than making it themselves.

The poll will ask members to respond to the following question:

Do you:

i) support a motion that The Victorian Bar Incorporated does not publicly support either the “yes” case of the “no” case in any referendum to alter the Australian Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice;

ii) support a motion that The Victorian Bar Incorporated supports Constitutional recognition of Australia’s First People. The Victorian Bar Incorporated considers that the amendment proposed by the Bill for an Act to alter the Constitution is sound, appropriate, and compatible with Australia’s system of representative and responsible Government which would be enhanced by the addition of the Voice; or

iii) choose to abstain from submitting a vote in respect of the above motions.

A separate memorandum compiled by the Bar’s right-wing faction was also circulated, arguing the Bar would “damage its hard won and long protected independence” if it chooses to offer an opinion on the voice.

“It will be engaging in the politics of the referendum and will be seen to be doing so by the community,” the two page memorandum read. “As importantly, any political endorsement will damage our Bar internally for years to come.”

The poll will open on May 31 and close on June 8.

The results of the poll, including the number of members who voted on each motion and the result of each vote as a percentage will be announced on June 9.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/victorian-bar-we-backed-samesex-marriage-we-can-back-the-voice/news-story/33433ddcdc10e7bb426fedbfd8758866

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849819

File: 8a822c4d21bb84e⋯.jpg (72.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Queensland_cabinet_ministe….jpg)

>>18676743

Treaty settlements could cost hundreds of millions and depend on size of massacres

LYDIA LYNCH and SARAH ISON - MAY 15, 2023

1/2

Treaty deals between Aboriginal Australians and state governments are likely to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars apiece and factor in the number of Indigenous people killed in historic local massacres, as Queensland looks to New Zealand and Canadian agreements to guide its new reconciliation laws.

Days after passing a treaty process touted as “setting the standard” in Indigenous-government relations, Queensland cabinet minister Craig Crawford told The Australian the amount of land taken by British colonial forces and the impact of massacres could be key considerations in formulating the value of each deal made with local Aboriginal groups.

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnership Minister’s comments come as Victoria and NSW pursue their own treaties with local Indigenous groups, while the federal government has committed to enacting the Uluru Statement of the Heart in full – from enshrining an Indigenous voice to parliament to pursuing treaty-making and truth-telling.

While it was “very hard” to give an exact estimation of the cost of future treaties, Mr Crawford said about 80 of the treaty settlements that had been finalised in New Zealand “nearly all cost tens or hundreds of millions of dollars” and the cost varied depending on the number of people killed and the amount of land taken by colonial forces in each area.

“So I think that will give us a bit of a guide to get an idea as to what that looks like in a Queensland context,” he told The Australian.

“But it depends on things like the level of impact that occurred in that particular part of New Zealand, what the history record shows, the level of massacres, the amount of land that they’ve lost.

“So it’s really going to vary (in Queensland) and is really going to have to be informed by the truth-telling inquiry that will run alongside (treaty).”

The exact number of Queensland treaties, which could take years to finalise, will depend on community consultation but there are about 150 Indigenous nations in the state. Financial payments would also vary depending on “impacts of colonisation” and it will be up to individual First Nations groups to decide how to spend settlement money.

Mr Crawford noted a number of Maori tribes had invested settlement funds to deliver long-term dividends rather than breaking it “into small chunks and handing it out to individual people”.

“They’ve worked with the government and learned how to do things like buy large industries, build corporate towers and partner with other organisations,” he said. “The New Zealand Maori economy right now, is worth about $68bn.”

Queensland’s traditional owners will lead negotiations on what they want in their treaties, but may ask for repatriations, joint management of national parks, renaming of places, changes to school curriculums and reforms introduced in health, criminal justice and child protection.

Mr Crawford said First Nations groups could put “anything on the table”.

“We would then, like any negotiation, start working through that process,” he said.

“There may be some things there that we say ‘no you can’t have that’, and sovereignty might be one.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849827

File: 941288f4cb2c121⋯.jpg (114.48 KB,768x1024,3:4,Ken_Wyatt.jpg)

>>18849819

2/2

Across the world, countries are paying out hundreds of millions of dollars to cement reconciliation and reparation with Indigenous groups, including the historic $800m settlement between British Columbia in Canada and five First Nations groups agreed to last month.

Former Indigenous Australians minister Ken Wyatt said he expected more states to move towards making their own treaty or agreement, pointing to Western Australia’s $1.3bn offer to settle the native title claim over Perth and the South West more than a decade ago.

“The Western Australian state governments have signed off (on agreements) way ahead of their peers,” he said. “Jurisdictions play an important role in shaping a destiny in a different-looking Australia over the next decade.”

But Mr Wyatt warned treaty-making would not lead to solutions for all challenges facing Indigenous Australians.

“Where there are international treaties in place … corresponding data shows there’s not significant improved outcomes in the social determinants. What people should focus on is getting the social determinants fixed, in terms of Australia focusing on the 17 (Closing the Gap) targets – such as improvements in reducing incarceration rates,” he said.

A Victorian government spokesman said its treaty negotiations, due to start this year, offered “the opportunity to transfer power to First Peoples, over the policies and programs that affect their lives, to the benefit of First Peoples and all Victorians”. Its 2022-23 state budget invested more than $150m over four years to support the First Peoples’ Assembly and to negotiate and establish key treaty elements required under its Treaty Act.

The Northern Territory also committed funds to continue its own treaty processes, including more than $4m over four years to “support the continued delivery of the treaty process including establishing First Nations Forums and truth-telling, and working in conjunction with stakeholders to develop local, regional and Territory voices to parliament”.

WA Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti said his state had made “significant progress” in Aboriginal recognition and reconciliation through the $1.3bn native title process but would not be drawn on treaty-making.

NSW also has not yet started a treaty-making process but the new government committed $5m for a 12-month consultation period to determine if there was a desire to begin the process towards treaty or agreement-making; and what that may look like.

Voice architect and referendum working group member Tom Calma said the funding put aside by states for any treaty-making would depend on the number of tribal groups in each jurisdiction, population size and land mass. But on a national level, he said, the focus needed to remain on the voice. “Let’s get the referendum out of the way then focus on agreement making.”

While committing almost $6m in the October budget to begin setting up the Makarrata commission – to “oversee processes for agreement-making and truth-telling” – Labor has not confirmed when it would pursue the treaty-making called for in the Uluru Statement.

Greens First Nations spokeswoman Dorinda Cox said her party wanted action on treaty and truth-telling now. “While supporting the Yes vote … we will continue to push the Albanese government to demonstrate their commitment to truth-telling and treaty-making with First Nations people in the same way they have shown leadership on the voice to parliament,” she said.

Mr Wyatt said treaty-making at a national level would be more challenging than at state level, given the number of Indigenous groups across the country.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/treaty-settlements-could-cost-hundreds-of-millions-and-depend-on-size-of-massacres/news-story/043700af1401e73fd278c305788b1366

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849860

File: 1e2b53874226a7c⋯.jpg (100.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_s_chief_def….jpg)

File: 6837c4e990f05b2⋯.jpg (178.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Detective_Inspector_Marcus….jpg)

>>18708667

AFP detective inspector ‘traumatised’ at prospect of Bruce Lehrmann rape conviction

REMY VARGA and KRISTIN SHORTEN - MAY 15, 2023

1/4

One of the lead investigators in the case against Bruce Lehrmann was distressed and morally traumatised by the prospect of the former ministerial staffer being convicted over the rape of Brittany Higgins.

Steven Whybrow SC, who represented Mr Lehrmann in the since-aborted trial, said Australian Federal Police Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman told him he believed the former ministerial staffer was innocent, and that if Mr Lehrmann was found guilty he would resign after the jury had retired to deliberate.

“He was somewhat distressed, my impression was a sort of moral trauma,” he said.

Mr Whybrow is giving evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system.

He said he got no impression during the course of the trial that any of the police officers sought a particular outcome or were conducting themselves unprofessionally.

Mr Whybrow said he didn’t see any strengths in the case against Mr Lehrmann as it came down to “Ms Higgins’ word”.

Lehrmann ‘was convicted before trial started’

Earlier, Mr Whybrow said his client was convicted in the media before his trial on charges of raping former ministerial staffer Brittany Higgins had even started.

Mr Whybrow said the perception of Ms Higgins as a victim was enhanced by ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates walking into the ACT Supreme Court with the former ministerial staffer during the trial last year.

“I don’t have a problem or a concern with that office, that statutory office holder [Ms Yates], providing that sort of support but it only served in this case, in my personal perspective, to already make a very difficult situation for Mr Lehrmann who was convicted in the media before the trial started,” he said.

“With the press club statements and any other number of public statements out there … the Logies … to then be walked in court every day by somebody whose job is to support victims, it only served in my perspective, to elevate her position as a complainant in this criminal justice sphere to one who is actually a victim of crime and we’re just going through the process here.”

Mr Whybrow said the Lehrmann trial was unusual because normally victims of sexual assault do not have to be identified or give public statements and Ms Higgins had made numerous public statements about the allegations.

Mr Whybrow said he had a problem with a complainant being referred to as a victim before a jury during a trial when allegations were being tested.

Mr Whybrow said Mr Lehrmann was demonised and Mr Drumgold was meant to act an “objective minister for justice” instead of a solicitor for Ms Higgins.

Mr Whybrow said Mr Drumgold’s statement abandoning a second trial against Mr Lehrmann that spoke of the constant attacks against Ms Higgins could have also included concern for his client who had been charged not convicted of rape.

“The DPP is not the solicitor for the complainant he’s meant to be the objective minister for justice,” he said,

“He could have said something as well about it no doubt being very difficult for Mr Lehrmann who has had his life turned upside down for the last two years.”

Drumgold’s speech ‘conveyed view Lehrmann was guilty’

Mr Whybrow said Mr Drumgold refused to tell him what he planned to say during the announcement that he was dropping the rape charge against his client before delivering a prepared speech that conveyed his client was “really guilty in his view”.

Mr Whybrow said he asked Mr Drumgold twice during a meeting on December 1 to reveal, in advance, what he planned say at his press conference about the discontinuation, being held the next morning, but the DPP would not tell him.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849862

File: e64ed37470f4995⋯.jpg (62.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_the_….jpg)

File: 99d1d7ebeedb2ce⋯.jpg (158.09 KB,1280x720,16:9,Steven_Whybrow_SC.jpg)

>>18849860

2/4

On December 2, Mr Drumgold dramatically announced that he would not prosecute the case again due to the impact it would have on Ms Higgins’ mental health while saying that he still believed the evidence offered a reasonable prospect of conviction.

Counsel Assisting Erin Longbottom KC asked Mr Whybrow if he believed Mr Drumgold’s speech conveyed that his client was guilty.

“Because your client was left in the position where the proceedings had been discontinued,” she said.

“He was entitled to the presumption of innocence.

“The subject matter of the complaint was now not going to be determined by the Constitutional arbiter of facts, that is the jury.

“And am I right to understand against that background … you were concerned that this passage conveyed a suggestion as to his guilt or innocence.”

Mr Whybrow said he believed the speech conveyed that Mr Lehrmann was “really guilty”.

“And in a sense, conveyed that he was really guilty in his view,” he said.

After Mr Drumgold’s announcement, he issued a media statement about the discontinuance which reflected what he had said at the press conference.

“It included an opinion … that he still considered that there were reasonable prospects of obtaining a conviction, which was … some sort of evidence or fact that it was a strong case and Mr Lehrmann was in fact really guilty,” Mr Whybrow told the inquiry.

“He just needed to say, public interest reasons was the reason that this case was being withdrawn.

“He did not need to say that and if I had got advance notice of that, I would have said to him, ‘if you’re withdrawing the case because Miss Higgins is not well enough to give evidence again, then that’s all you need to cite’.”

Mr Whybrow told the Board of Inquiry that Mr Drumgold had informed him on December 1 that he had decided to discontinue proceedings and that he planned to make an announcement about it the next morning.

“I wanted to have some advance notice so I could at least (be able to) comment on anything that he might say tomorrow at a press conference,” he said.

“I was concerned that it might contain statements that were not appropriate to be made when one is just simply withdrawing a prosecution.

“He said he wasn’t going to tell me what he was going to say. I asked twice.”

Later that night, after news of the discontinuance had leaked and was reported in the media, Mr Whybrow contacted Mr Drumgold to express his disappointment.

“It was made clear to the Chief Justice and I … that from his perspective, the proceedings, any announcement, anything to do with the case, we’re creating a significant health risk to Miss Higgins and he asked that the information about his decision tomorrow be entirely embargoed,” Mr Whybrow told the inquiry.

“The reasons why, I understood, so that steps could be put in place to ensure that Miss Higgins was in a safe place and had people around her etc.

“We, as in myself and (colleague) Miss Fisher, who were at that meeting literally agonised for several hours about whether we should tell Bruce … that tomorrow the DPP was going to withdraw the charge which was a fairly significant piece of information for him to learn.”

Chair Walter Sofronoff KC surmised that the same level of care and consideration afforded to Ms Higgins was not given to Mr Lehrmann.

“Attention was rightly paid to ensure that when this disturbing announcement was made, Ms Higgins was supported and protected,” he said.

Mr Whybrow said he held a team meeting where they agreed that Mr Lehrmann’s “mental health concerns are important”.

“He needs to not hear for the first time in the media tomorrow that this is going to happen,” he said was his team’s sentiment.

Mr Whybrow said he had not been prohibited from telling his client but didn’t want him to be blamed if the information leaked.

“And as it turned out, it did get its way into the media a couple of hours later, and thank goodness we had given him the heads up,” he said.

Mr Whybrow said he was concerned by Mr Drumgold’s announcement because “the DPP is not the solicitor for the complainant”.

“He’s supposed to be the objective Minister of Justice and could have said something as well (such as), ‘no doubt this has been very difficult for Mr Lehrmann, who has had his life turned upside down for the last two years, and will now not get an opportunity to clear his name’,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849864

File: f4e765a71089995⋯.jpg (107.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Linda_Reynolds_in_….jpg)

>>18849862

3/4

Reynolds ‘treated unfairly during Lehrmann trial’

Mr Whybrow said he was “pissed off and angry” at how Mr Drumgold treated Senator Linda Reynolds when she took the witness stand to give evidence at his client’s rape trial.

Mr Whybrow, who is giving evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system, this morning told chair Walter Sofronoff KC that during the course of the trial Mr Drumgold pointed out to him that Ms Reynold’s partner and their adult son were sitting in the back of the courtroom.

“He had raised with me at some point, his grave concern that Senator Reynolds’ (partner) was sitting in the back of the court,” he said.

“That confused me considering that sitting in the back of the court, throughout the case and throughout the absence of Miss Higgins, was Ms (Heidi) Yates, Ms Webster, (Ms Higgins‘) own lawyer and a whole lot of other people from, if you like, that camp, sitting there throughout it, so I couldn’t understand why Linda Reynolds’ husband sitting in the back of the court presented any different problem than all these other people sitting in court.

“He raised a concern that she might be getting information or having access to information that she shouldn’t.”

Mr Whybrow told the inquiry that he informed Mr Drumgold that he had received a text message from Ms Reynolds during the trial asking him if he could send transcripts of the proceedings to her solicitor.

To alleviate Mr Drumgold’s concerns, Mr Whybrow showed him the text messages he had exchanged with Ms Reynolds, to show him that there was no impropriety.

“By this stage, Senator Reynolds had sent me a text message asking for the transcripts,” he said.

“I disclosed those or I showed those to Shane for the purpose of allaying any fears because she‘d asked for transcripts to be sent to her lawyer and I think in my response, I said something about, you should just limit your knowledge of the case to what you read in the paper.

“I may have made a reference to her husband and said ‘even then you shouldn‘t really talk to him about it’.

“She wasn’t getting a transcript and I had positively suggested to her not to have any direct conversations with her husband.”

Included in Mr Whybrow and Ms Reynolds’ text exchange was a text from Ms Reynolds suggesting to the defence that it “might be worthwhile asking Nikki if she‘s got any texts” with Ms Higgins, or something to that effect.

Mr Whybrow told the inquiry that Ms Reynolds was simply suggesting a line of inquiry which was a “rabbit that we‘d already chased down”.

Mr Whybrow said that when Ms Reynolds took the stand, Mr Drumgold “weaponised” Mr Whybrow’s disclosure by “putting it to her as a positive assertion” that she had been trying to coach the defence and improperly solicit transcripts.

“I don’t hold a candle for Senator Reynolds but they were unfair,” Mr Whybrow said.

“And as far as I was aware, untrue, and from the perspective of the defence played on this so-called political cover up conspiracy (that) Brittany couldn‘t complain because all of these things were happening when there was no actual factual, evidential basis for it.

“And he put these positive things to Linda Reynolds up to and including that she was trying to tell me how to do my job and give me cross examination tips and I was pissed off, I was angry, and I wrote this email to him about what I considered was improper conduct.

“(I said) I‘m very concerned that you put it as a positive assertion.

“He didn‘t say, ’Were you giving coaching tips?’ He said, ‘you were giving coaching tips’ and there’s a significant difference.”

Mr Whybrow said there was nothing improper or inappropriate about his contact with Ms Reynolds.

“So what? A lot of people have given us suggestions over the months,“ he said.

“It wasn‘t just a one off question. It was the entire theme was effectively positive efforts of impropriety by Senator Reynolds in having contact with the defence.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849867

File: f76bc59880b1c07⋯.jpg (93.27 KB,1024x768,4:3,Lisa_Wilkinson_and_Brittan….jpg)

>>18849864

4/4

Drumgold ‘suggested political conspiracy to jury’

Mr Whybrow said Mr Drumgold suggested to the jury in the since aborted rape trial of Mr Lehrmann that there was a political conspiracy around the case in his closing remarks.

Mr Whybrow said he attempted to neutralise the suggestions to the jury as there was no evidence supporting a possible political conspiracy.

“I was concerned it was being put to the jury in the closing material of which there was no evidence,” he said.

Earlier Mr Whybrow said Mr Drumgold had attempted to discredit Senator Reynolds, who was a Crown witness, through his line of questioning about her engagement with defence.

Mr Whybrow said he gave his text messages to Mr Drumgold to allay his concerns about the senator’s conduct.

“He was cross examining his own witness to discredit her credibility, not to test something that was unfavourable to the Crown case,” he said.

Senator Reynolds texted Mr Whybrow during the case that he should check the messages between Brittany Higgins and another of her former staffers.

Mr Whybrow said the theme of Mr Drumgold’s closing address to the jury in the aborted rape trial of Mr Lehrmann was that there were “political forces at work”.

Mr Whybrow said it felt like the prosecution were trying to “bootstrap the credibility of the assertions made by Ms Higgins” despite the assertions being significantly contested.

“I took the view that there was no evidence to support them at all except for the assertions made by Ms Higgins,” he said.

“To then put them as positive propositions at the end of the case was unfair in submissions.”

Mr Whybrow said under cross-examination by inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff KC there was the suggestion in Mr Drumgold’s closing address that political witnesses, such as Senator Reynolds, couldn’t be believed because they were helping the defence.

“Those witnesses’ evidence was significant and he was trying to suggest to the jury reasons for not believing them because they were really part of the original cover up and even now they’re not only trying to dissuade Ms Higgins from making any complaint, they’re trying to help those acting for Mr Lehrmann,” he said.

DPP ‘read Brittany Higgins’ confidential files’

Mr Whybrow says he was flabbergasted when he learnt Mr Drumgold had read the former ministerial staffer’s confidential counselling notes.

Mr Whybrow said he started taking contemporaneous notes upon learning Mr Drumgold had read records from Ms Higgins sessions at the Canberra Rape Crisis Centre because it was out of the ordinary and “inconsistent with previous experience”.

“Frankly I was flabbergasted to be told this information that he/they were entitled to read them to know whether disclosable,” said Mr Whybrow.

Mr Whybrow said he asked the prosecution whether they had access to the counselling notes after Ms Higgins complained publicly that the defence had access to the counselling notes and said he assumed he’d been sent them accidentally.

“I wanted to ask the DPP if they had also got them accidentally,” he said.

Mr Whybrow said he was concerned the prosecution had read the material because they could contain evidence of inconsistent statements or “I made it all up disclosures” or material going to the credibility of Ms Higgins.

“I was not expecting to be told the DPP had read these and read them to an extent to ensure they were not disclosable,” he said.

Mr Whybrow said laws protecting confidential counselling records intended to ensure alleged victims could access help without fear their disclosures would later be used against them.

The inquiry has completed and will return on Tuesday morning.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/shane-drumgold-read-brittany-higgins-counselling-notes/news-story/30b12274293a7da30173f413da342c69

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849877

File: 97426d1bb82e7ff⋯.jpg (75.49 KB,1280x721,1280:721,The_Project_hosts_Waleed_A….jpg)

File: 4a7e9dd68f878dd⋯.jpg (90.33 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_Lisa_….jpg)

>>18708667

The Project ignores the Sofronoff inquiry into the handling of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial

SOPHIE ELSWORTH and JAMES MADDEN - MAY 15, 2023

Channel 10’s flagship prime time news and a current affairs program, The Project, has completely ignored the Sofronoff inquiry into the handling of the rape case against Bruce Lehrmann, despite the network being the first media outlet to air an interview with the complainant Brittany Higgins.

The weeknight show, predominantly hosted by Sarah Harris and Waleed Aly, last week did not make a single mention of the high-profile inquiry which has dominated newspaper front pages and TV and radio bulletins headlines all over the country since it began last Monday.

Former co-host of The Project, Lisa Wilkinson, had the first exclusive television interview with Higgins on February 15, 2021, following an online story published earlier that day by news.com.au political editor Samantha Maiden.

During the TV interview, for which Wilkinson won a Logie award, Higgins alleged she was raped by a male colleague – later identified as Bruce Lehrmann – in the parliamentary office of the then defence minister Linda Reynolds in March 2019. Mr Lehrmann has vehemently denied the allegations and charges were dropped against him in 2022 after his rape trial was aborted.

Prosecutor Shane Drumgold decided against a retrial because of concerns that the courtroom strain on Ms Higgins presented a “significant and unacceptable” risk to her life.

The Project’s failure last week to report critical developments in a story of significant public interest raises questions about the independence of its news coverage.

The Sofronoff inquiry has highlighted legal failings that may have prevented Mr Lehrmann from receiving a fair trial – a development that sits uneasily with the show’s support for Higgins.

University of Melbourne senior research fellow at the Centre for Advancing Journalism, Denis Muller, said the inquiry has “illicited some highly newsworthy material” but some media might be cautious to cover it.

The Project is headed up by executive producer Christopher Bendall.

He did not respond to questions from The Australian, nor did Ten’s spokesperson, despite multiple requests for comment. The Australian also sought comment from Wilkinson about The Project’s lack of coverage of the ongoing story for which she won her Logie, but did not hear back.

Wilkinson, one of the nation’s highest profile TV stars, announced in an emotional on-air monologue in November she would be departing The Project but would remain at the network. She has been absent from TV screens since then.

Despite The Project ignoring the high-profile Sofronoff inquiry last week, the show did however cover other high-profile criminal cases including the jailing of former NRL star Jarryd Hayne for four years and nine months for sexual assault.

It reported on this case multiple times during the week.

“Yes, in principle media organisations should report all things impartially,” Dr Muller said.

The Project’s decision to shun such a big story is not the only example of major media outlets ignoring matters of significant public interest in recent weeks.

The Australian’s month-long rolling coverage of the biggest art scandal in recent years – the extent of white involvement in the making of black art in the studios of the APY Arts Centre Collective – has been given scant coverage in other media outlets, most notably the ABC and the Nine-owned Sydney Morning Herald.

The SMH’s coverage – or lack thereof – of the scandal was sensationally called out by the masthead’s own art expert John McDonald last month, who said on his blog: “My own paper, the SMH, has fallen into the trap of feeling it has to be ‘supportive’ of institutions such as the NGA, running a week-long ‘campaign’ to argue the case for more government funding.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/the-project-ignores-the-sofronoff-inquiry-into-the-handling-of-bruce-lehrmanns-rape-trial/news-story/760132e442d0a6c86b64ebec0deed2b8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849888

File: fd5f51732475634⋯.jpg (143.83 KB,1200x720,5:3,China_Australia_resume_hig….jpg)

>>18835358

China, Australia resume high-level economic dialogue as bilateral ties improve under Albanese government

Improvement in bilateral relations benefit both countries: experts

Zhang Hongpei and Wang Jiamei - May 14, 2023

China and Australia are expected to see marked improvement in their trade ties with the two countries ramping up efforts to shore up economic cooperation following the recent resumption of high-level visits and dialogues, experts said.

Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell visited Beijing from Thursday to Saturday and he co-chaired the 16th China-Australia Joint Ministerial Economic Commission with China's Commerce Minister Wang Wentao. Farrell had a tour of Beijing's Palace Museum, also known as the Forbidden City.

Wang called on Australia to make joint efforts with China to expand common interests, and urged the two sides to address each other's concerns on the basis of equality and mutual benefit, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement on Saturday.

The two economies are largely complementary and have had fruitful economic and trade cooperation, Wang said, calling the two countries to continue to seek common ground while reserving differences. He called for practical cooperation to be enhanced.

Wang said China is willing to work with Australia to expand cooperation, and he hoped that Australia will provide a sound business environment and treat Chinese companies and products fairly.

Farrell said that the two sides have recently made substantial progress in advancing bilateral economic and trade relations, while properly handling each other's key economic and trade concerns.

Australia is willing to strengthen cooperation with China through multilateral and regional platforms such as WTO and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, Farrell said.

The joint ministerial economic commission presided by Wang and Farrell on Friday is the first such meeting since 2017, which is of significance to their improving bilateral relations, Chen Hong, president of the Chinese Association of Australian Studies and director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times.

It could be considered as a starting point for the reset of their bilateral relations, according to Chen, which hit a very low point due to the anti-China policy by the previous Australian government.

In May 2021, the National Development and Reform Commission, China's top economic planner, announced that it would indefinitely suspend all activities under the China-Australia strategic economic dialogue.

Trade and economic activities between China and Australia were heavily affected amid soured ties. In 2022, bilateral trade reached $220.91 billion, down 3.9 percent year-on-year. Australian exports to China totaled $142.09 billion, a drop of 13.1 percent.

Multiple Australian goods including coal, wine and lobsters have lost ground in the Chinese market as Chinese companies sought trade alternatives to Australian goods.

But the outlook for bilateral ties has been improving since the Australian Labor Party led by Anthony Albanese came into power last year. Now, high-level official interactions are on the rise.

"We applaud efforts by the Albanese government to stabilize and improve Australia's relationship with China. In the 'Doing Business in China' survey that we launched in December last year, the 'state of bilateral relations' was identified as the top risk affecting future investments in China by Australian companies," Vaughn Barber, chairman of China-Australia Chamber of Commerce (AustCham China), told the Global Times.

"The Australian business community in China welcomes Minister Farrell's visit. Elimination of the remaining 'trade blockages' on some of Australia's trade with China would remove another key challenge, which was highlighted by respondents in our survey. It would be a win-win outcome for Australian exporters and Chinese importers and end-consumers," Barber said.

Improving the once fraught relationship has been a top-down process since the Bali summit between the two countries' leaders in November, and the momentum is gaining pace, Chen said. He predicted that the two sides will find more room for cooperation including in clean energy and green economy.

During Friday's economic talks, the two ministers agreed on several issues, including restarting the free trade agreement joint committee, strengthening green and low-carbon cooperation, and supporting cooperation between enterprises from both countries in digital trade and e-commerce.

Farrell's visit came on the heels of the visits by Australian state leaders including Daniel Andrews, premier of Victoria in March, and West Australian Premier Mark McGowan in April.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290678.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849904

File: 2d5023d04d5d036⋯.jpg (96.13 KB,1280x720,16:9,Zhuo_Xinrong_aka_Zhuo_Long….jpg)

Fishing boss sanctioned by the US for human rights abuses backs powerful Chinese-Australian group

AMANDA HODGE and WILL GLASGOW - MAY 15, 2023

1/3

A Chinese fishing magnate recently blacklisted by the US government for human rights abuses is a top donor and ‘permanent honorary chairman’ of an influential China-Australia organisation with suspected links to the Chinese government.

An investigation by The Australian has revealed that Zhuo Xinrong has been a donor and senior office-holder with the Sydney-based Australia China Economics Trade and Culture Association (ACETCA) for more than eight years, and the organisation refuses to say it has cut ties with him.

Mr Zhuo, known also as Zhuo Longxiong, is also chairman and majority shareholder of Pingtan Marine Enterprise, a notorious global fisheries industry player linked to labour abuses in Indonesia and poaching in the Galapagos Marine Reserve - a globally-treasured, protected marine area.

The US Treasury Office declared Mr Zhuo a Specially Designated National under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act - which targets any foreign person identified as engaging in human rights abuse or corruption in December, he had his US-held assets frozen at the time, and his company is subsequently being delisted from the Nasdaq stock exchange.

Mr Zhuo has been associated with ACETCA - one of Australia’s most influential Chinese organisations whose membership ­includes some of the diaspora community’s wealthiest businesspeople – since at least 2014.

Mr Zhuo was the host and funder of a 2019 ACETCA event in Pingtan, Fujian Province, at which former prime minister Kevin Rudd, now Australian ambassador to the US, delivered a keynote speech, and which the now-outgoing NSW parliamentary speaker Jonathon O’Dea ­attended and also spoke.

Both Dr Rudd and Mr O’Dea said had they known about Mr Zhuo’s activities. they would not have attended the event.

The Chinese fisheries magnate with close links to the Fujian provincial government was also singled out for thanks for his financial contributions to ACETCA’s Hong Kong-based funding arm at a Sydney event in 2018 at which Anthony Albanese gave a speech.

Mr Zhuo’s Australia connections, through ACETCA and at least one Australian-registered company, raise fresh concerns about the role of China’s foreign influence organisations and the ability of federal authorities to police them.

Pingtan Marine told The Australian when contacted that “we are in conversation with the US Treasury” over the sanctions, but would make no further comment.

Mr Zhuo declined to comment on his ACETCA links or his sanctioning when approached through Pingtan Marine Enterprise’s Fujian offices, though was still credited as an ACETCA honorary chairman on its WeChat page in March last year when he donated $5000 to a NSW flood appeal.

The Australian Government would not comment specifically on Mr Zhuo, his association with ACETCA or whether the group should be registered under the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme, which requires individuals and entities to register “if engaged in lobbying, communications or disbursement activities on behalf of a foreign principal for the purpose of influencing a particular political or governmental process, and where no exemption applies”.

But, a government spokesman told The Australian; “The sanctions laws of other countries may apply to the activities of Australian citizens or Australian-registered bodies corporate, whether undertaken in Australia or overseas.

“We encourage individuals and entities to consider the wider legal and commercial context of their activities and seek advice about whether they might be affected by the sanctions law of another country.”

Australian academic Clive Hamilton, author of the book Silent Invasion which examined how the Chinese state integrated itself into Australian public life, first noted ACETCA’s “close ties” to the Chinese government in a joint 2018 parliamentary submission with Chinese Communist Party expert Alex Joske into foreign interference.

Professor Hamilton says the fact Zhuo Xinrong was able to infiltrate influential Australian organisations shows domestic foreign interference laws have had little deterrent effect on Beijing’s influence activities.

“It’s concerning that a bad actor like Zhuo can be given a senior position in an Australian organisation that seems to have access to political leaders,” Professor Hamilton told The Australian.

“ACETCA is now the foremost Beijing influence and interference organisation in this country, certainly in Sydney. Yet some of our political leaders wander into its orbit with their eyes closed.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849910

File: 9921ee1c36acbce⋯.jpg (132.19 KB,1280x720,16:9,Outgoing_NSW_parliamentary….jpg)

>>18849904

2/3

ACETCA was named again in a February 2023 parliamentary review into the effectiveness of Australia’s 2018 Foreign Intelligence Transparency Scheme as the likely successor to the scandal-tainted Australian Council for the Promotion of Peaceful Reunification of China (ACPPRC) - previously the Chinese Communist Party’s main influence arm in Sydney.

China expert Alex Joske told that review the ACPPRC “very clearly in the past operated at the direction of the United Front Work Department or its officials”, a CCP agency that aims to build support for China’s political ­agenda and accumulate influence overseas but that is also used “as cover for more concerning ­influence operations by agencies such as the Ministry of State ­Security”.

“Many of the individuals there really shifted to operating through another organisation called the Australia-China Economics, Trade and Culture Association, which is still very active and essentially has much of the same membership as this organisation,” Mr Joske said.

Mr Zhuo is one of those whose membership overlapped both organisations.

The ACPPRC group was listed in January by the federal Attorney-General’s office as a foreign government-related entity, but ACETCA is not on that registry. While its financial operations are tightly held, the group’s lavish functions have caught the eye of Australian government officials.

Last November, ACETCA hosted an opulent banquet at Sydney’s Star Casino with hundreds of guests to celebrate the 50th anniversary of relations between Australia and the People’s Republic of China.

China’s Ambassador Xiao Qian gave a toast to a boisterous audience of mostly Chinese Australian business people, along with former Trade Minister Andrew Robb, Liberal MP Paul Fletcher, then NSW Minister Geoff Lee and the current NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey.

One source said their understanding was that major donors had contributed around $1m to the group’s operating budget, although ACETCA has not revealed details of its finances.

ACETCA declined to comment when approached through multiple channels over the last fortnight, though a person close to the organisation told The Weekend Australian that while they were aware of sanctions against Mr Zhuo he was a “very generous donor”.

The group - whose activities are subsidised by its board of honorary chairmen, including Mr Zhuo and other wealthy Chinese mostly based in Fujian province - has repeatedly denied links to the Chinese state.

It insists it is apolitical but has made more than $18,000 in declared political donations since 2014, the most recent a $1500 donation this year to the NSW Liberal party.

Mr Zhuo has been a delegate to at least two influential CCP bodies; the Fujian Chinese People’s Political Consultative Committee and deputy chair of the Fujian Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese.

The two groups are known to be a bridge between Chinese overseas associations and the United Front Work Department.

His Pingtan Marine Enterprise, one of China’s largest publicly-traded fishery companies until its delisting, operates a distant water fishing fleet through a web of affiliated companies heavily subsidised by the Chinese state to fish in the high seas.

ACETCA also came under scrutiny in 2019, when NSW Labor staffer John Zhang was forced to step down as its vice chair after he was found to have participated in a propaganda training course run by the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office and the Chinese Academy of Governance - the same body that trains senior CCP cadres.

ACETCA sponsors an annual Sydney Lunar New Year festival, finances university scholarships, and donates to numerous good causes, including children’s hospitals and disaster funds such as the 2022 NSW floods to which Mr Zhuo contributed $5000.

For years it has also courted Australian politicians, though with less success since the foreign influence legislation, and less prominence during the pandemic.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18849921

File: 084a5974d0aa0df⋯.jpg (117.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_prime_minister_Kevi….jpg)

>>18849910

3/3

A spokeswoman for Dr Rudd told The Australian in a statement that he was offered a speaking fee - which he donated to the National Apology Foundation - to attend the 2019 Pingtan event for ACETCA, which had a “long history of engagement with Australian political leaders, including Scott Morrison, Malcolm Turnbull and Tony Abbott”.

The former PM had “no recollection of ever meeting this particular individual (Zhuo Xinrong)”, no record of correspondence and did not recognise his name though, “given the nature of these speaking events, it is entirely possible that they met at the event in Fujian which was also attended by other prominent Australians”.

“Dr Rudd finds forced labour and torture entirely repugnant. He has spent his life campaigning against these matters and for the rights of workers, just as he has long worked with the Pacific Island nations and others in the region to combat illegal fishing,” it said.

“Of course, if Dr Rudd was aware of this individual’s activities which have just been detailed by the US Treasury, then he would not have attended.”

Mr O’Dea, an outgoing NSW Liberal MP and speaker, told The Australian he had paid his own way to the 2019 event and “vaguely” recalled meeting the Hong Kong and China-based Mr Zhuo, but he too would have reconsidered his trip had he known more about its host.

“I certainly would have thought twice (about attending) and I suspect Albo and Kevin Rudd might have also rethought if they knew this guy’s sponsorship was underwriting the event,” he said.

Mr Zhuo’s alleged illicit business operations and links to the Chinese Communist Party have been the subject of extensive investigations in the US in recent years, and numerous media reports dating back to 2016 and earlier.

Pingtan has received tens of millions of dollars in state subsidies and grants since 2014 and hundreds of millions more in state investment and bank loans, according to a May 2022 report by the Washington-based Centre for Advanced Defence Studies (C4ADS).

Pingtan Marine Enterprise or its subsidiaries- controlled largely by relatives of Zhuo - have been prosecuted in Ecuador, fined in East Timor and banned in Indonesia. Last month, alarm bells were raised in the Philippines after five Pingtan vessels were found to be fishing just outside of the Southeast Asian nation’s exclusive economic zone.

The damning C4ADS report on Pingtan and Zhuo Xinrong, entitled Net Worth, cited more than a dozen reports of forced labour and abusive conditions aboard Pingtan-owned or controlled ships.

In December, Mr Zhuo, Pingtan Marine, eight affiliated companies including Fuzhuo Honglong Ocean Fishing, and 125 fishing vessels were sanctioned by the US Treasury office of Foreign Assets Control under the Magnitsky Act which targets perpetrators of serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.

Pingtan was the first Nasdaq-listed company to be targeted under the United States’ Global Magnitsky Act, prompting the US Stock Exchange to announce its delisting in December. The company’s appeal failed and it is now in the process of being delisted.

US Treasury’s Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian Nelson said the “designations demonstrate how seriously we take the problem of illicit fishing and our commitment to holding the perpetrators of serious human rights abuses to account”.

China’s foreign ministry responded with immediate fury, claiming the actions represented interference in China’s internal affairs and accusing the US of “double standards”.

Despite few obvious business links to Australia beyond a shelf company registered to ghost offices in the same Sydney Chinatown building as ACETCA, Mr Zhuo has also been an office holder of the Australian Council for the Promotion of Peaceful Reunification of China (ACPPRC), which courted politicians through its honorary chairman and billionaire property developer, Huang Xiangmo. Mr Huang was deemed unfit to have an Australian passport in 2019.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/fishing-boss-sanctioned-by-the-us-for-human-rights-abuses-backs-powerful-chineseaustralian-group/news-story/48ca004f6dd44340de4d0808355ea480

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855229

File: ebe0b555fe2a3e1⋯.mp4 (15.83 MB,640x360,16:9,US_special_counsel_critici….mp4)

File: b75af6627c154a6⋯.jpg (66.36 KB,1024x768,4:3,Former_Australian_foreign_….jpg)

File: b29422cb8f05e26⋯.jpg (90.73 KB,1024x768,4:3,Foreign_policy_advisor_to_….jpg)

US special counsel slams FBI probe of Trump-Russia collusion sparked by Alexander Downer

The FBI investigation into Trump-Russia ties triggered by Australia’s Alexander Downer has been labelled “seriously flawed”.

Tom Minear - May 16, 2023

The FBI has been blasted for launching a bombshell investigation of Donald Trump’s Russia links based on Australian intelligence which its lead agent admitted had “nothing to this”.

Former Australian foreign affairs minister Alexander Downer inadvertently sparked the extraordinary saga during the 2016 presidential election when he wrote a diplomatic cable about a conversation he had with a junior official in Mr Trump’s campaign.

New details of his role have been laid bare in a report by Trump-appointed special counsel John Durham, who spent four years investigating the FBI’s handling of the collusion probe and concluded it was “seriously flawed”.

Mr Durham detailed Mr Downer’s interview with FBI agents about his meeting with George Papadopoulos, who had suggested to him over drinks in London that Russia had damaging information for the Trump campaign on rival candidate Hillary Clinton.

Mr Downer, who was Australia’s high commissioner to the UK at the time, told the FBI he did not believe the junior official was “a fraud”, although he had an “inflated sense of self” and was “trying to impress” him.

He said he “did not get the sense Papadopoulos was the middleman to co-ordinate with the Russians”.

Within days of Australia reporting Mr Downer’s information to the US government, FBI deputy assistant counterintelligence director Peter Strzok opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation that spiralled into a years-long political drama.

But prior to interviewing Mr Downer, in a taxi on the way to the Australian High Commission in London, Mr Strzok told an FBI legal attache: “There’s nothing to this, but we have to run it to ground.”

The attache later asked another agent if there was “more to this”, and when the agent said that was “all we have”, the attache said: “Damn that’s thin.”

“I know … it sucks,” the agent replied in an encrypted text message.

The legal attache also said that British intelligence officials “could not believe the Papadopoulos bar conversation was all there was”.

When the FBI asked its British counterparts for further assistance in the probe, the attache reported that they were told “there was no [expletive] way in hell they were going to do it”.

Mr Downer told Mr Durham’s inquiry that Mr Papadopoulos simply stated that “the Russians have information”, and that he had not mentioned “Clinton emails, dirt or any specific approach by the Russian government to the Trump campaign team with an offer or suggestion of providing assistance”.

Mr Durham wrote that while FBI officials believed the investigation was justified because Australia was a reliable and trusted partner, he said the Australian government “could not and did not make any representation about the credibility of the information”.

He lashed the FBI for launching the probe without testing the intelligence, especially as it “clearly had the ability to affect an approaching presidential election”.

However, Mr Durham’s inquiry mostly repeated prior criticisms of the FBI, and it fell short of proving what Mr Trump claimed was a concerted effort to take him down which he described as “the crime of the century”.

In a statement, the FBI admitted it had made “missteps” but said it had already “implemented dozens of corrective actions”.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/us-special-counsel-slams-fbi-probe-of-trumprussia-collusion-sparked-by-alexander-downer/news-story/6dc511ec62023f34561964306eca4d32

https://twitter.com/FBI/status/1658212156817416204

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855233

File: 37c25ecf413bfbe⋯.jpg (161.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Joshua_Gorringe_the_genera….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18849819

Indigenous treaty negotiations to include mine veto in Queensland

CHARLIE PEEL and SARAH ELKS - MAY 16, 2023

1/2

Indigenous corporations will push for the power to veto mines in environmentally and culturally sensitive areas as part of landmark treaty negotiations with the Queensland government.

Joshua Gorringe, the general manager of the Mithaka Aboriginal Corporation in western Queensland, says a priority for a future Mithaka treaty with the state would be the right to block resources projects on their ­traditional land.

Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships Minister Craig Crawford told The Australian that First Nations groups could put “anything on the table” during treaty negotiations.

Mr Crawford also flagged that individual treaties could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars apiece, reflecting the devastating impact of British colonisation on the state’s Indigenous peoples.

The Labor government passed the historic Path to Treaty legislation last week, with the backing of the Liberal National Party opposition, describing it as “setting the standard” in Indigenous-government relations.

The Mithaka have been calling on the government to rule out development of future resources projects in waterways on the Lake Eyre Basin flood plain, but Mr Gorringe said the government had been full of “empty promises”.

The Australian has previously revealed that the government has delayed the release of its plan for environmental protections across the Lake Eyre Basin because it is trying to facilitate future mines in the northern part of the basin.

Mr Gorringe said his people were supportive of resources projects if they were appropriately located and suggested a right to have a say on suitable mining sites was something that they could put forward in the treaty process.

“We’d love to see some more restrictions put on mining over the flood plains and all that kind of stuff as well,” he said.

“To have an actual say, not just a tokenistic say, where our opinion actually counts for something.

“We know that we need resources (projects).

“We’re not that naive or stupid to think that we are going to survive on air only but there are spots where it’s going to be less detrimental to the environment and our songlines and cultural sites associated with the river systems and flood plains.”

The Mithaka people are the traditional owners of a vast 55,425sq km portion of southwestern Queensland that rivals Tasmania in size.

Asked how much compensation his people would seek as part of a treaty, Mr Gorringe was unsure.

“Compensation is an extremely hard one,” he said.

“How do you put a value on cultural loss? We’ve lost a lot of our language, song, dance, ceremony stuff, purely because of colonisation. What dollar value do you put on that?

“If a government told everyone, ‘Righto, we don’t believe in God anymore’, how does that affect society? Is it worth $100m?”

Mr Gorringe compared trying to find a dollar value on sacred sites like the Jukkan Gorge caves, destroyed by miner Rio Tinto, with ascertaining a value for Notre Dame Cathedral.

“It’s a really complicated thing,” he said.

“I think a lot of people would be looking at some kind of compensation, but it’s a million-dollar question as to how that would work.

“One size won’t fit all.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855235

File: 87f6382352448fa⋯.jpg (124.59 KB,768x1024,3:4,Truth_for_Treaty_Interim_b….jpg)

>>18855233

2/2

Mr Gorringe said Mithaka negotiations would be based on ensuring the corporation was self-sustaining and able to employ its people. That could include ownership of cattle stations or businesses in mining, environmental protection and tourism industries that the corporation currently contracts workers to.

Mick Gooda, a member of Queensland’s Interim Truth and Treaty Body who has been consulting with First Nations people about treaties since 2019, said many treaty parties would want an acknowledgment of sovereignty and past atrocities.

“A lot of people will talk about sovereignty; we are a sovereign people, and some people will as a result talk about colonisation and removals,” said Mr Gooda, Australia’s former Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social justice commissioner.

“As for compensation, it’s up to each group to make their decision about what they want.”

Mr Gooda said “just about every treaty party” would push for joint decision-making on elements of government services such as education, health, youth justice and housing, and joint management of national parks.

For example in child protection policy, Mr Gooda said a ­treaty party could ask that decisions usually made by the state government department about foster care or kinship care could be delegated to a local Aboriginal organisation.

He pointed to a situation in the Northern Territory in which police had agreed with local elders to not enter men’s lore camps in order to arrest suspects.

“There’s a protocol now – if someone is wanted by the police, the police would have to go to the senior elder group, and the elder would undertake to bring the person out of the camp,” Mr Gooda said. “That could be done in Queensland, if the treaty party wanted.”

He said even if a traditional owner group had not been recognised as native title holders, such as the Bidjara people over the Carnarvon Gorge national park, there could still be a treaty negotiated, and joint management of the national park awarded.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous-treaty-negotiations-to-include-mine-veto-in-queensland/news-story/a9a1d122a03bf65539eb3e005267f66e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855259

File: f2b407ff455193f⋯.jpg (67.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Andrew_Dillon.jpg)

File: a6a7fda24f8c334⋯.jpg (176.6 KB,1280x720,16:9,Andrew_Dillon_has_made_cle….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18693450

>>18784850

>>18789803

AFL Commission set to work on league’s position on grand final start time, Voice to Parliament

JON RALPH - MAY 15, 2023

Essendon is set to become the latest AFL club to endorse an Indigenous Voice to Parliament as the AFL Commission works on the league’s position at a meeting this week.

The AFL commission is set to consider two topics of significance, with the start time for the 2023 Grand Final set to be decided by the commission this week.

AFL chief executive elect Andrew Dillon made clear when he was announced in the job that he strongly supported a day grand final.

Dillon said he was at heart a traditionalist who had a preference for day grand finals but that it was “ultimately a decision for the entire commission”.

The league is still hopeful Alastair Clarkson and Chris Fagan might appear at a mediation session next Tuesday as it attempts to broker a peace deal for the Hawthorn saga.

Clarkson and Fagan have repeatedly denied any wrong doing.

It comes as it also makes clear to the Tasmanian government that there is no 19th licence without a stadium deal given the strong stance of the league and 18 clubs.

Amid that busy agenda, the league has asked all clubs to form a position on the Voice and has also liaised with its National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Council.

The league seems likely to support the Voice given the large number of Indigenous players who bless the game, with AFL champion Eddie Betts already throwing his support behind a yes vote for the referendum.

That referendum will take place between October to December this year and would make changes to the constitution to better represent the country’s First Nations peoples.

Richmond on Monday joined Collingwood and West Coast to put out statements supporting the First Nations Voice to Parliament being enshrined in the Constitution.

The Tigers said on Monday they recognised and respected people’s right to form their own views but the “lived experience of the club” meant it supported the Voice.

Essendon, which has worked hard to boost its Indigenous representation on and off the field in the past year, is also expected to make a statement in support of the Voice.

While former prime minister John Howard this week said sporting bodies should stay out of politics, AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan made clear in March the league was keen to make a stand on social issues.

“We lead the community on social issues,’’ McLachlan said.

“And those who yell at us to stick to football don’t understand who we are and what we mean in the community – we don’t lecture or tell others what to do. We simply say to everyone in this country that we represent you, or we aspire to. We make it known what we stand for, the AFL and our clubs.”

AFL clubs were told by the AFL to make a decision on their club’s stance on the voice by May 8.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/afl-commission-set-to-work-on-leagues-position-on-grand-final-start-time-voice-to-parliament/news-story/7282d1ea63d26d7d48089725cdc85da2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855269

File: ddd218178d516c0⋯.jpg (744.6 KB,825x1240,165:248,RFC_1.jpg)

File: 24e01581c1b03b1⋯.jpg (309.01 KB,960x1200,4:5,FwJUYOyaUAAIpJy.jpg)

>>18676743

>>18855259

>>18789803

Richmond FC Tweet

Empowering and listening to Indigenous voices has made Richmond a better Club.

We are richer for it, a more connected and culturally safe Club.

It has strengthened us on and off the field.

We recognise and respect people's right to form their own views, but the lived experience of our Football Club means we fully support the proposed Voice to Parliament and a Yes vote.

https://twitter.com/Richmond_FC/status/1657980433118945280

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855298

File: de8748a86f19ecc⋯.jpg (162.86 KB,1280x723,1280:723,Defence_barrister_Steven_W….jpg)

File: 080aabf9826da4e⋯.jpg (158.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Steven_Whybrow_SC_testifie….jpg)

File: 8ce4bb151c89f6a⋯.jpg (127.53 KB,768x1024,3:4,Prosecutor_Skye_Jerome.jpg)

>>18708667

‘Outrageous’: prosecutor’s texts over Higgins leak

A heated text exchange between Bruce Lehrmann’s defence barrister and prosecutor Skye Jerome about revelations published in The Australian have been made public.

KRISTIN SHORTEN - May 16, 2023

A heated text message exchange between Bruce Lehrmann’s defence barrister Steven Whybrow and prosecutor Skye Jerome about revelations published in The Weekend Australian last year have been made public at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system.

Mr Whybrow’s communications – published by the Board overnight – show that on December 3 last year Ms Jerome contacted him just after 7am demanding to know whether he had leaked the AFP’s investigative review document, now known as the Moller Report, to The Weekend Australian after an article detailing its contents was published that Saturday morning.

At 7.13am Ms Jerome texted Mr Whybrow asking: “Who leaked the documents to the Australian?”

Mr Whybrow texted straight back: “What’s happened now”.

Ms Jerome then sent him a link to The Weekend Australian’s article.

“Quoting all the police advices,” she wrote. “Outrageous.”

Mr Whybrow responded: “Firewalled. None of us. 100%.”

Ms Jerome then sent him the link to another related story published by The Weekend Australian that morning.

“Hope you make the same accusation to the cops,” Mr Whybrow fired back.

Ms Jerome sent him a question mark, followed by a frosty: “I asked you a question”.

Mr Whybrow responded that he had “no idea where that comes from”.

“Still can’t read it,” he said.

Ms Jerome then screenshotted and texted the article to Mr Whybrow.

“Wow. Thanks for sending. F*ck!,” he replied.

The pair spoke on the phone before Ms Jerome texted Mr Whybrow again at 10.15am.

“Thanks for talking this morning,” she said. “I appreciate it.”

The police document being referred to, authored by Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, included discrepancies in Brittany Higgins’ evidence and suggested police did not think there was enough evidence to prosecute Mr Lehrmann.

The ‘Moller Report’ revealed police had concerns about Ms Higgins’ credibility but could not stop the DPP from proceeding with the charge because there was “too much political interference”.

Its contents was published in the Weekend Australian on December 3, 2022 following DPP Shane Drumgold’s announcement a day earlier that he had decided to discontinue proceedings against Mr Lehrmann due to fears for Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Mr Whybrow began giving evidence at the Board of Inquiry on Monday and is continuing his evidence this morning.

The messages were obtained after the ACT Board of Inquiry issued a subpoena to obtain Mr Whybrow‘s communications with prosecutors and police over matters related to Mr Lehrmann’s trial.

The communications also reveal that The Australian’s columnist Janet Albrechtsen had called Mr Whybrow on October 19, 2022 – the day the jury began deliberating – and asked him to confirm the Moller Report’s existence.

“I received a call from Janet Albrechtsen (journalist) asking me about a document she referred to as the ‘Moller Report’,” Mr Whybrow said in his statement to the inquiry.

“From what she was telling me, I understood this to mean the Investigative Review Document or some parts of it.

“Ms Albrechtsen requested I confirm the document existed. I informed her I was not prepared to comment on the matter at all.

“I suggested she may wish to enquire with AFP media, the Police involved in the investigation, or lodge a Freedom of Information request for the document she was describing.”

The day after the call from Ms Albrechtsen, Mr Whybrow contacted Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman and asked him how the media could access the documents.

“Mate can you give me a call or better can we have a chat,” Mr Whybrow texted him on October 20.

They spoke on the phone before exchanging further text messages.

Detective Boorman told him that the journalist would need to try to obtain it through a Freedom of Information application.

“Appreciate our discussion. Just spoke to Scott. The lady will need to go through the FOI processes,” he texted.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sofronoff-inquiry-reveals-heated-texts-between-lawyers-over-lehrmannhiggins-file-leak/news-story/83632a6769b1b6aa7712007bdc862945

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855326

File: acec736c0d0c9ac⋯.jpg (71.69 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_s_rape_tria….jpg)

File: b99312414181adc⋯.jpg (77.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Chief_Justice_Lucy_McC….jpg)

>>18708667

Secret court transcript reveals rogue juror ‘deeply sorry’ after causing Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial to be aborted

KRISTIN SHORTEN - MAY 16, 2023

1/2

The confession of the juror who caused Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial to be sensationally aborted late last year can now be revealed, after the Sofronoff Inquiry released the transcript of a secret Supreme Court hearing.

The court transcript, published in a bundle of exhibits overnight, revealed what happened behind the scenes after a court sheriff discovered that a rogue juror had taken prohibited material – in the form of a research paper about sexual offending – into the jury room on October 26 last year during deliberations.

The next morning ACT Supreme Court Chief Justice Lucy McCallum discharged the jury before bringing the juror and Sheriff’s Officers who found the prohibited material into the courtroom to ask them what had happened in the presence of the prosecution and Mr Lehrmann’s legal team.

“While tidying up the room, I had accidentally knocked a folder off a chair,” the sheriff’s officer told the Chief Justice.

“I had noticed there was a document inside one of the clear folders that we give to the jurors at the beginning of the trial.

“A document, and at the top, I noticed that it wasn’t part of the exhibits.

“I then informed the other two sheriff’s officers who were with me and they agreed that it wasn’t part of the exhibits.”

The sheriff’s officer then radioed their boss to tell them what they had discovered. The Acting Sheriff then informed the Chief Justice.

During the closed-court hearing on October 27 the juror, who cannot be identified, told Chief Justice McCallum they were “deeply sorry” for taking the prohibited material into the jury room.

The juror admitted taking the document into the jury room but said they had just wanted to “clarify a point for myself”.

“I brought it in to show where the clarification came from and we agreed that it shouldn’t be, because it was research, that it shouldn’t be discussed … and we have not discussed it,” the juror said.

Chief Justice McCallum said she would have to “discharge the whole of the jury at this point”.

“Can I say I give you my sincere apologies,” the juror told her.

“I wasn’t aware that doing this was in any sense a wrongdoing. I was just purely doing, finding out what it meant, certain words, and in case I mentioned it to the jury, I wanted to make sure that I wasn’t inventing anything.

“Because we’re not allowed to, I didn’t want to throw anything in the bin, I kept everything in the folder.

“No one has read it, no one knows anything about it. I just thought I would mention that.”

Chief Justice McCallum thanked the juror for their explanation and apology but said it was a “risk that I’m unable to take”.

“I am deeply sorry for this,” the juror reiterated.

“I’m willing to take responsibility for that, Your Honour, if you feel that that’s appropriate.”

Chief Justice McCallum said “that’s a matter for you”.

“But I do remind you that it’s an offence to disclose your deliberations,” she said.

“So I would prefer that you preserve your anonymity.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855329

File: c176eea3d618568⋯.jpg (116.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Liberal_Party_staff….jpg)

>>18855326

2/2

Former liberal staffer Brittany Higgins alleged Mr Lehrmann raped her in Senator Linda Reynolds’ ministerial office in the early hours of March 23, 2019 after a night out drinking with colleagues in Canberra.

Mr Lehrmann was later charged with sexual intercourse without consent and pleaded not guilty.

The 29-year-old’s trial was sensationally aborted in October due to juror misconduct and immediately listed for a retrial in February before proceedings were discontinued altogether in December.

The transcript has come to light after the Board’s chair Walter Sofronoff KC issued Mr Lehrmann’s defence barrister Steven Whybrow SC with a subpoena to provide a written statement about a number of matters related to the trial including the discharge of the jury.

“To the best of my recollection, late on 26 October 2022 and after the jury had been sent home for the day, I received a telephone call from one of her Honour’s associates requesting that I immediately attend her Honour’s chambers,” Mr Whybrow said in his statement to the inquiry.

“Her Honour informed the parties that while tidying up the jury room that evening a sheriff’s officer found a document that he immediately recognised should not have been in the jury room.

“Her Honour showed us what appeared to be a research paper relating to the reporting and investigation of sexual offending.”

Chief Justice McCallum stated that she had no choice but to discharge the jury the following morning.

“Both myself and Mr Drumgold SC indicated our agreement with Her Honour’s assessment,” Mr Whybrow wrote.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/secret-court-transcript-reveals-rogue-juror-deeply-sorry-after-causing-bruce-lehrmanns-rape-trial-to-be-aborted/news-story/1e0220bc630a7a247255cd5182f8b72e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855354

File: 976c6b0ae40090f⋯.jpg (438.16 KB,825x970,165:194,VM_4.jpg)

File: edcf59e855e1cea⋯.mp4 (9.39 MB,640x360,16:9,MT_gZksmPQpi6IOV.mp4)

>>18676820

>>18714027

Ukraine enlists Eurovision stars to lobby Australia for Hawkei fighting vehicles

Tom Lowrey - 16 May 2023

Ukraine's Eurovision stars Tvorchi have called on Australia for more help to fortify the country's "heart of steel", renewing calls for Australian-made Hawkei fighting vehicles.

In a slick new social-media campaign from the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence, the two artists used their profile to make a personal plea to Australia for the additional support.

"We want to say thank you for supporting Ukraine in the fight to defend our country," the artists say in the clip.

"Your Bushmasters have been helping our defenders on the front line, and we know that you have something else to help our cause - Hawkeis.

"We would love a little more help."

The pop duo made their plea after placing seventh with their song Heart of Steel in the Eurovision finals in Liverpool last weekend, as Russians attacked their Ukrainian home town.

Ukraine has been lobbying Australia to provide Hawkei tactical vehicles for months, hoping to build on the success its military has found using Australian Bushmaster vehicles.

The Hawkeis are smaller tactical vehicles, with removable armour and optional mounts for weapons.

Ukrainian officials have made clear their ambition is to mount surface-to-air missiles on the Hawkeis and capitalise on the mobility the vehicles provide.

"The most useful application of Hawkei is its ability to provide a highly mobile launch platform for [surface to air missiles]," Ukraine's ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said in a social media post linking to the Tvorchi video.

"This state of the art air defence system is already in use in Ukraine and proves to be a game changer in defending Ukrainian cities and civilians from aerial attacks."

Ukraine's campaign to "free the Hawkeis" has included public rallies around the country in recent weeks aimed to build public pressure.

It follows a similar successful campaign to "free the Leopards", which pushed European countries to provide their Leopard tanks to the war effort.

The Australian government has so far resisted calls to provide Hawkeis, and there is hesitation within army ranks about providing the vehicles.

There have been problems with the Hawkei's braking system, which have delayed the rollout of the vehicles within the ADF.

Ukrainian officials have previously indicated they are unconcerned by the braking problems.

Asked about the provision of more military aid in recent weeks, Defence Minister Richard Marles indicated more would be forthcoming.

But he was noncommittal when pressed specifically on Hawkeis.

"I'm not about to speculate on specific platforms, but … we are one of the largest non-NATO contributors," he said.

"We intend to continue to be that and we're working really closely with the Ukrainian government about how we can best make a contribution, knowing that this is going to be a protracted conflict and we need to be there with Ukraine for the duration.

"And so, we will continue to do that and we will work with them about how that contribution can be best provided."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-16/ukraine-eurovision-due-joins-campaign-for-australian-hawkeis/102351344

https://twitter.com/AmbVasyl/status/1658265712379695107

https://twitter.com/DefenceU/status/1658257813955829760

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855376

File: fdf109b9e7dc24a⋯.jpg (431.6 KB,3279x1992,1093:664,Donald_Trump_received_a_ra….jpg)

File: d36cef22cba4721⋯.jpg (1.15 MB,3943x2366,3943:2366,Surely_Biden_would_crush_T….jpg)

>>18670474

>>18670549

>>18696839

>>18714072

OPINION: Trump’s ‘evil charisma’ menaces the US - and Australia

Matthew Knott - May 16, 2023

1/2

Standing in front of the Sydney Opera House sails next Wednesday, Anthony Albanese is set to host three of the world’s most important leaders: US President Joe Biden, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. Not since the APEC leaders meeting in 2007 has the prime minister’s home town hosted such an important geopolitical gathering.

In a pleasing piece of circularity for Albanese, the summit coincides with the first anniversary of his government. Albanese jetted to Japan to meet his fellow “Quad” leaders just a day after being sworn into office last year, kick-starting a diplomatic debut most foreign policy experts have rated as surprisingly successful.

“Not all prime ministers have started off in the same relaxed and confident way in foreign affairs,” Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove told me last year, noting Albanese was not regarded as a foreign policy guru before his election victory.

Albanese’s Opera House triumph, however, could be derailed by squabbling over the United States debt ceiling. The US government is due to run out of money within weeks, and Biden has indicated he may have to stay in Washington for negotiations with congressional Republicans. Biden wants to make the trip, but there are troubling precedents for a withdrawal. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama both pulled out of Asian summits at the last minute during similar crises.

As well as the catastrophic prospect of a US government default, another spectre hovers over America, and by extension Australia, in the form of a possible Donald Trump return to the White House.

In theory, this year should have been disastrous for the twice-impeached ex-president. After being arrested and charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records, a New York jury last week found Trump had sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll and ordered him to pay her $US5 million ($7.5 million).

Just as Godzilla gained strength from nuclear radiation, these scandals have allowed Trump to tighten his grip on the Republican Party’s presidential nomination.

The conservative base largely swallowed Trump’s lies about election fraud in the 2020 election and similarly believe his claims of being unfairly persecuted by a biased left-wing legal system. Victimhood is the juice in the Make America Great Again machine, fuelling the sense of grievance that binds Trump and his supporters together.

For all the attention Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has attracted as a potentially more palatable version of Trump, his campaign has floundered before he has even officially entered the race.

At the end of February, Trump led DeSantis as the favoured Republican nominee by just 13 percentage points in the RealClearPolitics average. That lead has now blown out to 31 points. There’s no sign DeSantis has the star power or national appeal to end the love affair between Trump and his base.

This affection was on full, and at times disturbing, display last week when Trump appeared at a CNN-hosted Town Hall in New Hampshire. The crowd of Republican-leaning voters chortled and cheered as he called the female moderator “nasty”, labelled Carroll a “wack job” and said he would pardon many of those convicted for the January 6 storming of the Capitol.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855382

File: 785a768c91acd92⋯.jpg (207.15 KB,852x662,426:331,Q_3466.jpg)

File: 6655769eecf7dae⋯.jpg (46.04 KB,850x400,17:8,quote_never_interfere_with….jpg)

>>18855376

2/2

But surely Biden would crush Trump in a general election? Not necessarily. The polling averages show Trump and Biden in a dead heat. That’s remarkable when you remember that opinion surveys have usually underestimated Trump’s appeal.

The final 2020 election polls showed Biden outperforming Trump by 7.2 percentage points; in the end, Biden won the popular vote by 4.5 points. Thanks to the arcane Electoral College system, Trump would have won a second term if just 43,000 voters in three states had switched their support from Biden.

“It should be a pretty big wake-up call for Democrats,” former Biden administration press secretary Jen Psaki said of Trump’s CNN performance. “He has the evil charisma that people can hate but it is happening … This guy is on the path to be the Republican nominee and maybe, likely, give the president a run for his money.”

To be sure, Biden would still be favoured to beat Trump. The Democrats performed surprisingly well at last year’s midterms and there’s no evidence Trump is any more popular with the moderate, suburban voters who cost him re-election in 2020. Young voters and women will be fired up over abortion rights and gun control.

But the 80-year-old Biden will likely appear even more frail in 18 months. He’s weighed down by low approval ratings and an unpopular vice president in Kamala Harris. This makes a Trump return to the White House a serious possibility, one that Albanese and Washington ambassador Kevin Rudd need to be prepared for.

A resurrected Trump would feel emboldened to follow his instincts, making him more unpredictable and dangerous than his first term. America would again become a climate laggard and its support for Ukraine’s fight against Russia would be in doubt.

The implications for Australia would be especially profound given how tightly enmeshed the two nations have become in response to China’s rise to superpower status.

A Trump tantrum about handing over America’s precious Virginia-class submarines would unravel the AUKUS pact and leave Australia’s maritime security badly exposed. An increasing number of Australians would question the long-term value of the US alliance.

If Biden has to miss next week’s Quad summit, it will be a momentary disappointment for Albanese. A Trump victory in 2024 would be an almighty cataclysm. It’s happened before and can happen again.

Matthew Knott is the foreign affairs and national security correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/trump-s-evil-charisma-menaces-the-us-and-australia-20230514-p5d89y.html

Q Post #3466

Jul 22 2019 19:51:16 (EST)

These people are stupid.

Enjoy the show!

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3466

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18855396

File: 08d07523cf9448b⋯.jpg (238.08 KB,1620x1080,3:2,Australian_Cardinal_George….jpg)

File: 5c28be7aed15129⋯.jpg (352.42 KB,852x496,213:124,Q_2590.jpg)

File: c6ad8342828bf77⋯.jpg (186.64 KB,852x455,852:455,Q_2594.jpg)

File: 1d68db16bbd941e⋯.jpg (545.06 KB,847x876,847:876,Q_2894.jpg)

>>18682194

Cardinal Pell Showed Us What Interior Freedom Really Looks Like

Cardinal Pell knew the secret to remaining sane in a culture gone mad.

Maryella Hierholzer - May 15, 2023

What is it like to have hope in the worst of circumstances, to keep the peace of Christ under what seem like seemingly insurmountable odds in a near totally socially dysfunctional scenario? That is having the spirit of the late Cardinal George Pell - a man who was imprisoned unjustly for 13 months on such horrible charges, but who chose to live in a spirit of inner joy with our Lord.

Years ago I read the spiritual classic Interior Freedom by Father Jacques Phillippe for the first time. I was so inspired by his description of detachment in living a knowledge of the love of God for each person and in choosing to love others despite a terrible surrounding situation. The book is phenomenal and one I have read many times. And yet, other than examples in the lives of past saints and Christ himself, I have found it hard to find an individual today profoundly living this much-needed perspective of trust in God and love of all. More than suffering the wartime scenario of World War II, as my own father had, who was there who understood what it is like to be like Christ amid the nonsense and the hatred of the years post-2015? Such a man is Cardinal Pell.

Much has been written about Cardinal Pell’s prison journal volumes, but I would like to discuss some specifics that make this man someone so many can identify with now, and who exemplifies the freedom so many are searching for. Each entry in the journal is ended with a brief prayer, a petition from an incarcerated person who is not anguished but who is one with Christ. From reading how the cardinal swept his cell or prayed for other prisoners he overheard crying out in despair, one experiences a soul who is truly living abandonment in the arms of Jesus.

While many yearn for such freedom, they often give up trying and instead live in a pseudo-freedom in which they denigrate themselves or other persons. And yet the late cardinal shows us that abandonment is as simple as choosing to find enjoyment in one’s food served as an inmate or praying extra prayers when the person designated to bring you Holy Communion on Sunday doesn’t arrive for one reason or another. Cardinal Pell also describes his trustful surrender as picking up the Bible and deciding to read the Book of Job while always being aware that it is Jesus Christ who has now given us the capability to be co-redeemers in his suffering and who opened up the hope of eternal life for all. These are just a few of the daily activities outlined in the journal of a man who loved to read but was confined to a cell with no chair - only a bed and an open toilet.

As I watch the situation in our country deteriorate daily and wonder about the possibility of a larger multinational war, do I want to retreat inwardly or instead find ways to make life better for future generations by living out the virtues of faith, hope and love in my daily routine? What is most impressive is the lack of bitterness or resentment displayed by the late cardinal toward anyone inside or outside the Church. He shares the disappointing aspects of human hatred shown to him with forgiveness and prayer.

Cardinal Pell is a man who remained sane despite the insanity of being imprisoned on false, horrific charges. He is a model for our times and a man to remember always in our prayers.

Maryella Hierholzer is a parishioner at St. Elizabeth Ann Seton in Fort Wayne, Indiana. She is a graduate of Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts and did graduate work at Georgetown University. After concluding a career in the Washington area, she is now retired in Indiana where she is a teacher of adult and youth faith formation at her parish. She is also a volunteer at Catholic Charities in Fort Wayne.

https://www.ncregister.com/blog/cardinal-pell-and-interior-freedom

https://qanon.pub/#2590

https://qanon.pub/#2594

https://qanon.pub/#2894

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860427

File: 8a4e33109b5b990⋯.jpg (108.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,Marine_One_the_US_presiden….jpg)

File: b44f0a5b366da53⋯.jpg (116.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,Joe_Biden_and_Jill_Biden_a….jpg)

Joe Biden cancels Australia trip, Quad meeting in doubt

BEN PACKHAM and NOAH YIM - MAY 17, 2023

1/2

US President Joe Biden has cancelled his upcoming visits to Australia and Papua New Guinea in a blow to Anthony Albanese and to America’s standing in PNG as China looks to expand its influence in the country.

Mr Biden was due to arrive in Sydney next week for the Quad leaders summit, which is now in doubt with the offices of both Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese PM Fumio Kishida confirming they were reconsidering their own travel plans.

The cancellation comes amid intractable negotiations between Democrats and congressional Republicans over a looming US debt ceiling deadline.

“The President spoke to Prime Minister Albanese earlier today to inform him that he will be postponing his trip to Australia,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement. “He also invited the Prime Minister for an official state visit at a time to be agreed by the teams.

“The President’s team engaged with the Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea’s team to inform them as well.”

Mr Biden will attend the G7 meeting in Japan from Friday to Sunday as planned, but will skip the PNG and Australian legs of his trip.

The developments came as Mr Biden and top Republican Kevin McCarthy were locked in talks on raising the ceiling for federal borrowing to avoid a market-shaking default.

Mr Albanese said he and Mr Biden would work to reschedule his visit to Australia at the earliest opportunity.

“President Biden called me this morning to discuss his upcoming visit to Australia. The President apologised that he would now have to postpone this visit because of the unfolding difficulties he is facing in his negotiations with the US Congress over the US Government debt ceiling,’’ Mr Albanese said.

“These negotiations are scheduled to enter their critical and concluding phase during the last week of May. Regrettably, this conflicts with the President’s visits to Sydney and Canberra – including the Quad Summit scheduled for 24 May.

“The President and I agreed that we would work to reschedule his visit to Australia at the earliest opportunity.

“I also look forward to visiting Washington later this year for a state visit to the United States.

“The Government is now in discussion with our friends in both Tokyo and Delhi on Prime Minister Kishida’s and Prime Minister Modi’s travel. Once those discussions are concluded, we will make a further announcement on their travel.

“In the meantime, I look forward to meeting with both Prime Ministers and the President at the G7 Summit in Hiroshima on 20-21 May.”

Mr Biden’s cancellation is being felt heavily in PNG, where the impoverished Marape government had spent millions preparing for the presidential visit, and was preparing to sign a wide-ranging security agreement with the US President.

The planned defence co-operation pact would give US warships and aircraft unimpeded access to PNG waters and airspace. Leaked draft text of the agreement will infuriate China in its scope, and feed Beijing’s arguments of growing US militarisation of the region.

Prominent PNG blogger Martyn Namorong tweeted: “We even declared a National Public Holiday for Biden‘s historic visit only to be thrown under the bus by the US.”

The cancelled presidential trip will also force Pacific Island Forum leaders, who were due to converge on PNG for a meeting with Mr Biden, to change their travel plans.

It was only on Tuesday night that Mr Biden has accepted an invitation to address the Australian parliament next week.

Preparations for Mr Biden’s visit had been in full swing, with a US C-17 Globemaster arriving at Sydney Airport to deliver the President’s helicopter, Marine One.

The President was due to use the helicopter to travel between Sydney, where the President and his 1000-plus entourage were to stay, and Canberra, where he was due to address both houses of parliament.

The now-cancelled parliamentary address would have been the fifth by a US president.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860431

File: 10f479ed3c3ab85⋯.jpg (163.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_Mr_Biden_….jpg)

>>18860427

2/2

The Quad leaders were due to discuss regional security, critical and emerging technologies, cybersecurity, climate change mitigation and resilience, health safeguards, and co-operation to build regional infrastructure.

Mr Biden’s visit to Australia was to be the first US presidential trip to the country since 2014, when Barack Obama addressed parliament.

He and Mr Albanese were set to discuss progress on the AUKUS pact and the need for legal and regulatory changes to enable the sharing of advanced US technology.

Mr Modi is scheduled to speak at an Indian diaspora community event on Tuesday night at Sydney’s Qudos Bank Arena. He hosted a similar gathering during his last visit, in 2014, which was attended by about 20,000 people.

Mr Albanese is slated to join Mr Modi at the event, where he is expected to talk up Australia’s close ties to India, encompassing trade, investment and security.

“Our strong partnership with India will deliver economic benefits for Australia in trade, investment and business,” Mr Albanese said on Tuesday.

Prime Minister Kishida last visited Australia in October last year. His scheduled visit will follow the G7-Plus meeting in Hiroshima starting on Friday, which Mr Albanese is attending.

“No partner in the Indo-Pacific is closer than Japan,” Mr Albanese said.

“Our partnership is underpinned by our shared values, including a commitment to democracy, human rights, free trade and a rules-based order.”

The US-PNG defence co-operation agreement is aimed at lifting the presence of US armed forces in the South Pacific amid fears its bases in Guam, Japan and The Philippines are well within range of Chinese missiles.

Under the draft text of the agreement, which some suspected the Chinese of leaking to stoke opposition to the deal, US aircraft and ships could “enter, exit, and move freely within the territory and territorial waters of Papua New Guinea”.

It would give the US “the exclusive right” to oversee disciplinary or criminal proceedings in relation to US personnel.

The agreement would grant the US access to key facilities including Jackson International Airport and the Port Moresby Seaport, Lombrum Naval Base on Manus Island and Lae’s airport and sea port. It says US forces would be authorised to control entry to agreed facilities and areas, or portions thereof, which have been provided for exclusive use by US forces, and to co-ordinate entry with the appropriate authorities of Papua New Guinea”.

PNG “shall not require passports or visas” for US personnel, and will allow the US to establish satellite receiving stations in PNG, and use the country’s territorial radio spectrum, the draft agreement states.

The draft text of the agreement was already being compared by some to China’s security agreement with Solomon Islands, which set off a frenzy of speculation Beijing was set to establish a military base in the China-friendly Pacific nation.

Australia is negotiating its own defence treaty with PNG, expected to be finalised next month.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/joe-biden-prepares-for-historic-address-to-parliament/news-story/7b4fe6fe2d222b130894517ccb4455a0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860436

File: f55d0ae5ce2fc58⋯.jpg (404.33 KB,1920x1280,3:2,US_President_Joe_Biden_s_l….jpg)

>>18860427

Biden’s 11th hour Quad snub a disappointment, a mess and a gift to Beijing

Matthew Knott - May 17, 2023

Anthony Albanese’s disappointment is Xi Jinping’s victory.

Joe Biden’s decision to pull out of next week’s Quad leaders’ summit in Sydney is a personal blow for the prime minister, who was preparing to bask in the glow of hosting three of the world’s most powerful leaders in his home town.

China’s president-for-life, meanwhile, will be giddy with delight at the summit falling into disarray.

Biden flagged last week that he may have to stay in the US for emergency debt ceiling negotiations, but the official line from Washington and Canberra was the trip was going full-steam ahead. At 10.30pm on Tuesday, Albanese proudly announced Biden would address a joint sitting of parliament next week, seemingly confirming the trip was happening. Less than nine hours later, Biden had sent his apologies.

To add insult to injury, The New York Times and Reuters were reporting the visit was cancelled long before any official confirmation went out, as officials played for time, saying it was “under a cloud”.

A no-show from a United States president will never be a good news story, but the garbled messaging makes Biden’s dismount look especially messy. Adding to perceptions of a snub, he has found time to travel to the G7 summit in Hiroshima but not to Australia or Papua New Guinea.

Far more important than any hurt feelings it has caused, Biden’s withdrawal matters because of the damaging message it sends to the Asia-Pacific about America’s commitment to the region as it fiercely competes with China for influence.

Beijing has loathed the Quad since its inception, blasting it as an “exclusive clique” and falsely characterising it as an “Asian NATO”.

In fact, the Quad is a nebulous grouping that is anything but a formal alliance. It doesn’t have an official website or a post office box, let alone a secretariat.

Former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe initiated the Quad in 2007 to support what he hoped would be an “Asian Arc of Democracy”, but the group collapsed just a year later.

The Quad came back to life in the Trump era and Biden elevated it to new heights in 2021 by making it a leaders-level grouping. So far, its practical outcomes have been unremarkable: a vaccine-sharing initiative that struggled to get off the ground, plus measures to track illegal fishing vessels and create a low-emission shipping network.

The group’s power – and the reason Beijing despises it so much – lies in what it represents.

While the Quad leaders never mention China by name in their official joint statements, the grouping’s reason for being is to offer an alternative to Beijing’s authoritarianism.

“We are liberal democracies and believe in a world order that favours freedom,” then-prime minister Scott Morrison proclaimed after the first in-person Quad leaders meeting in 2021.

With a total population size of almost 2 billion and the possibility to later include nations such as South Korea and Canada, the Quad’s potential influence is huge.

As Kevin Rudd, now Australia’s man in Washington, has written: “Beijing has concluded that the Quad represents one of the most consequential challenges to Chinese ambitions in the years ahead.”

Xi’s nightmare is that the Quad continues gaining steam, entrenching itself as a permanent and effective feature of the region’s diplomatic architecture. Any setback for the Quad is a morale boost for Xi.

Just as unfortunate is the fact Biden will no longer travel to Papua New Guinea for what would have been the first visit by a US leader to the nation. The Pacific is the front line of US-China geostrategic competition and Biden’s failure to show up is a loss of momentum after impressive recent efforts to restore America’s standing in the region.

As former senior State Department official Evan Feigenbaum noted on Twitter: “The issue isn’t commitment but dysfunction. The US can profess to be ‘committed’ all it wants. But it’s tough to ‘lead’ when everyone you hope will follow you wonders why you keep deliberately steering toward hurling yourself off a cliff.”

Biden’s withdrawal is not unprecedented: Bill Clinton and Barack Obama both skipped summits in Asia during similar domestic crises. But that’s far from comforting. The US wants to remain the leader of the free world but domestic divisions mean it now regularly struggles to keep its government from shutting down and defaulting on its debts.

The Quad summit in Sydney should have provided a powerful symbol of four proud democracies working together to get things done. Instead, it will serve to highlight the systemic problems plaguing the world’s longest-standing democracy and its aspirations for ongoing global leadership.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/biden-s-11th-hour-quad-snub-a-disappointment-a-mess-and-a-gift-to-beijing-20230517-p5d8y0.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860441

File: 288db7b15a07797⋯.jpg (139.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Quad_meeting_in_Sydney….jpg)

>>18860427

Joe Biden skips Australia, PNG when ‘turning up is half the battle’

BEN PACKHAM - MAY 17, 2023

Joe Biden’s cancellation of his Australian trip and the scrapping of next week’s Quad meeting in Sydney will be deeply disappointing for Anthony Albanese.

The optics of a presidential visit, and of hosting the US, Indian and Japanese leaders together at the Opera House, would have capped-off a remarkable year of diplomacy for Albanese, who has proven to be a surprisingly capable international statesman.

The only person likely to be more disappointed than Albanese is Papua New Guinea’s Prime Minister James Marape, who was preparing to host Biden in Port Moresby the day before the President was due to arrive in Sydney.

Xi Jinping visited PNG nearly five years ago, but a US president has never visited the country, or indeed any independent South Pacific state.

As former intelligence chief Richard Maude told this masthead, “turning up is half the battle” when it comes to Indo-Pacific diplomacy.

Biden’s failure to turn up in PNG hands an easy win to Beijing.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will still make the trip to Sydney for a bilateral visit, but Japan’s Fumio Kishida will cancel as well.

Biden’s decision to skip the Australian and PNG legs of his Asia trip is understandable.

Failing to negotiate a rise to the US debt ceiling would fuel Chinese arguments of America’s decline, undermine the US dollar as the currency of international trade, and spark a financial crisis that could spread across the globe.

It’s curious the Prime Minister's office was able to confirm Biden’s visit to journalists on Tuesday afternoon when there were clearly still question marks over the President’s program.

The Quad meeting will now take place in Japan on the sidelines of the weekend’s G7 summit, which Albanese will attend as Kishida’s guest.

Albanese also looks to have scored a consolation prize, revealing his trip to Washington later this year will be for a full state visit.

But holding the Quad meeting in Sydney would have thrown the spotlight on the South Pacific, where China is locked in a battle for influence with the US and Australia.

Preparations for the President’s trip to Port Moresby were also well underway, and a wide-ranging defence security agreement had been negotiated for signing during the visit.

A draft of the agreement somehow leaked, revealing US forces would gain unimpeded access to PNG’s waters and airspace.

Some suspect Chinese interests of circulating the leaked text to undermine prospects of the agreement going ahead.

Biden was also due to meet the leaders of a raft of Pacific Island nations who were travelling to PNG for the occasion.

They will need sustained US attention going forward or China will seize the advantage.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/joe-biden-skips-australia-png-when-turning-up-is-half-the-battle/news-story/8048eb4bf474c0e1d52254d95e8d04cd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860464

File: 11141e2e6c5afc7⋯.jpg (194.95 KB,960x640,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 8a789ef9ca3baa0⋯.jpg (180.18 KB,913x624,913:624,Vote_for_constitutional_In….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18760676

>>18775344

Voice support slides again as debate rages over model

David Crowe - May 17, 2023

1/2

Support for the Indigenous Voice has tumbled from 58 to 53 per cent over the past month in the crucial “yes or no” question that will decide a referendum on the issue later this year, deepening the risk of defeat after furious disputes on the change.

The sharp fall in support includes pivotal shifts against the Voice in big states such as Queensland and volatile swings in smaller states that challenge assumptions that Australians will cast a majority vote for the contentious change to the Constitution.

An exclusive new survey shows that 44 per cent of voters support the Voice and 39 per cent oppose it when asked about the government proposal for change, with another 18 per cent undecided.

When asked a “yes or no” question akin to the referendum on the exact wording planned by the government, 53 per cent support the change but 47 per cent are opposed.

The survey, conducted for this masthead by Resolve Strategic, confirms a slide in support for the Voice that has continued for more than six months and puts the No campaign on track for a majority by August if there is no change to the trend across the published polls.

The competing campaigns are running out of time to win the debate and the growing opposition to the change raises questions for Indigenous advocates about whether they would be willing to modify the proposal, such as by taking out references to executive government, to improve their chance of success.

The Resolve Political Monitor surveyed 1610 eligible voters from Wednesday to Saturday about the wording proposed by the government to change the Constitution to recognise First Australians by establishing the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.

Resolve director Jim Reed said the results raised the prospect that the referendum would be rejected because it would not meet the “double majority” requirement for a majority of votes in a majority of states.

“We’ve definitely got states moving over to the No column now,” he said.

“This is a reminder that you don’t need to go below 50 per cent at a national level to lose this referendum. You can lose it at 54 or 53 per cent. And the Yes campaign is getting down to that level.”

Support for the reform fell from 64 per cent last September to 58 per cent earlier this year before sliding again to 53 per cent over the past month.

The latest findings come after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton stepped up his warnings against the change to the Constitution on the grounds there was no clarity about who would be elected to the Voice group and how it would influence government decisions.

“I find it a very dangerous process because you’re talking about every element of government decision-making where the Voice will have to be consulted,” he said on Monday.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has rebuffed calls from conservatives to scale back the power of the Voice to gain input into decisions by executive government, limiting its role to consulting with parliament.

“We should just listen to people, ask them if we’re going to have an impact on them, that’s just really common courtesy,” he said in a radio interview on Tuesday.

“And importantly, you get better results when you involve people in things that impact them.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860467

File: 8b2db83b361a6f3⋯.jpg (203.38 KB,926x599,926:599,Support_for_the_Voice_to_p….jpg)

>>18860464

2/2

While the government has expressed confidence in gaining a Yes vote at the referendum – likely to be held in October or November – the results in the Resolve Political Monitor confirm the trend against the proposal over months of results from 28 polls by JWS, Essential, YouGov and other firms in addition to Resolve.

Reed said a key problem was that voters were not convinced by the model being put forward even if they supported the aspiration. He pointed to the recent decision by the Yes campaign to emphasise the recognition of First Australians in its advertising rather than go into the details of the Voice.

“No amount of advertising is going to sell a product that people aren’t sure about,” Reed said.

“Not being able to talk about the product or the problem it solves in your advertising only amplifies the perceived risk.”

The Resolve Political Monitor tells respondents the proposed change to the Constitution in the exact wording set out by the government in the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) Bill before asking them their views in two main questions. The first gives voters the option to be undecided while the second allows only a “yes or no” response akin to the referendum. The results have a margin of error of 2.4 percentage points.

In the first question and the “yes or no” question, the Resolve Political Monitor gives respondents the proposed referendum question in full: “A proposed law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposal alteration?”

The latest survey found that 69 per cent of Labor voters and 83 per cent of Greens voters backed the Voice in the “yes or no” question but only 27 per cent of Coalition voters did the same, highlighting the partisan divide on the issue.

While the Resolve Political Monitor found there was majority support in a majority of states for the Voice at the beginning of this year, Reed said support had fallen below a majority in Queensland and results from South Australia and Tasmania were volatile from month to month.

More surveys would be needed over the coming months to offer a better guide to results in each state, he said.

JWS Research founder John Scales said his firm had found an increase in the No vote in its February survey and would be conducting another in the weeks ahead.

Scales said the polling helped explain why the advocates for the Voice were highlighting the recognition of First Australians rather than the details of the constitutional change in their advertising.

“Recognition of Indigenous Australians is actually a driving reason for a lot of people, so I can see why the Yes campaign is changing its approach,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/voice-support-slides-again-as-debate-rages-over-model-20230516-p5d8t1.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860493

File: 8d550192dec6e69⋯.jpg (71.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser_will_introdu….jpg)

File: 764a5ed639d3224⋯.jpg (75.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: ca5abb52493bef2⋯.jpg (649.38 KB,970x993,970:993,The_Voice_referendum_quest….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18860464

Julian Leeser to propose changes to Voice as new polls reveals support falling

Ellen Ransley - May 17, 2023

A leading Liberal proponent of the Voice will attempt to save the referendum from failing when he introduces amendments to a Bill before parliament next week.

Julian Leeser, who stood aside from the shadow frontbench last month to vote yes in the referendum, said the electoral prospects for the Voice were “not tracking as they should”.

A new Resolve poll – conducted for the Nine newspapers – has on Wednesday revealed support for the Voice is falling, with just 53 per cent of respondents likely to vote yes, down from 58 per cent a month ago.

Mr Leeser said he believed the best way to improve the prospects of a successful referendum was to “limit the arguments of the no case” by removing the proposed amendment to allow the Voice to make representations to the executive government.

He said the two amendments he would put to the House next week would “strengthen the proposition to be put to the Australian people at the referendum”.

“I believe the Voice should make representations to executive government – and that function can be included in legislation rather than in the Constitution,” he said.

“I am a supporter of the Voice, I will be voting yes at the referendum, the amendments I am proposing will improve the electoral prospects of the Voice.”

Many no campaigners are concerned the Voice’s ability to make representations could clog up the courts or slow down government decision-making.

But last month, long-awaited Solicitor-General advice revealed the proposal would not, in his opinion, “pose any threat to Australia’s system of representative and responsible government”.

Stephen Donaghue said the Voice would “enhance” the system of government.

Leading yes campaigners, including distinguished professor and reform architect Marcia Langton, have routinely said the Voice must be able to advise the executive government.

During a joint select committee hearing into the Voice last month, Professor Langton, who co-wrote the Voice co-design proposal, said in order for the Voice to be successful it needed to make representatives to both parliament and the executive government.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been adamant executive government derives its power from parliament, which remains sovereign under the Voice proposal.

The latest polling indicates a sharp fall in support in states like Queensland and swings in smaller states that cast the possibility of a majority yes vote in doubt.

The no campaign is on track for a majority by August if there is no change to the trend, the poll suggests.

Yes campaigner Dean Parkin said the polling proved the conversation needed to get out of the “Canberra bubble” and into communities across the nation.

“At this stage, the target is all Australians across the country,” he told ABC Radio.

“We’re not at the stage of targeting specific states, taking for granted that we‘ve got particular states in the bag and that we can just coast our way through there.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/julian-leeser-to-propose-changes-to-voice-as-new-polls-reveals-support-falling/news-story/afc612dd3a31465b5edf94567fe8184b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860523

File: e6c8a50813296e3⋯.jpg (194.87 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_takes….jpg)

File: 826cc204ec43d97⋯.jpg (98.24 KB,1280x720,16:9,Queensland_Premier_Annasta….jpg)

File: 645866bd2babe70⋯.jpg (177.31 KB,1280x720,16:9,Linda_Burney_standing_with….jpg)

>>18676743

US-style treaties in Australia will only entrench racial turmoil

TIMOTHY LYNCH - MAY 17, 2023

1/2

Treaty and truth-telling have a catchy, progressive buzz to them. They represent the next, inevitable, stages of “decolonisation”, whether or not the voice gets up.

Treaties with Indigenous nations are being explored by every state government, often trained in the task by academics. And Anthony Albanese has given racial reconciliation the highest priority.

But what model does this activism follow? What “settler” nation has a reconciliation plan worth emulating? Progressive activists variously advocate a hybrid of Canada, New Zealand and South Africa. None is particularly suited to Australian conditions.

Canadian progressivism aims to transcend nationalism; what then of the Kulin nation? The Kiwis have appeased the Maori for centuries; these indigenous citizens remain the poorest in that rich state. South Africa? No amount of reconciliation since 1993 has stalled its spiral into one-party kleptocracy and enduring black disadvantage.

But the US template just might be the worst of all; it could be one of the best.

We joke that when the US sneezes, Australia will eventually catch a cold. It is true of trade and economics. It also applies to the politics of race. US campus “anti-racism” is increasingly the approach deployed in Australia. Our universities embrace the call of “anti-racism” as if its conseq­uences could be only beneficial and its opponents only racist.

Unavoidably, a US racial lens is how we view our own struggles with Indigenous inequality. But American treaties, to take just one aspect of its complicated racial politics, are an option that it is difficult to see working in Australia, at least not as penance.

The 19th-century treaties between the US government and American Indian tribes had little of the progressive feel-goodism of contemporary Australian treaty advocates. Like any treaty, they recognised, rather than sought to dissolve, long-running distinctions between the two parties. Treaties were undertaken to recognise boundaries, to reaffirm the foreign status of American Indian tribes, to solidify alliances against US rivals and to exchange land.

Treaties were not racial atonement. Treaties recognised political difference and outlined political responsibilities. The possibility of these types of treaties in contemporary Australia is unclear as the challenges are many. First, Indigenous Australians are Australian citizens. Second, who represents what Indigenous Australian group so negotiations might proceed? Third, formalising what groups are legitimate and over what territory is fraught.

The benefits that American Indian tribes realise from treaties is through savvy discretion – which many have in abundance – over territory. Progressive politics have and had nothing to do with it.

But the treaty model is the opposite of much of what the voice proposes. Treaties secure local autonomy rather than incorporation into national politics. American Indians and their treaties make them subject to the consequences of their own decisions rather than serve as claims over national legislative politics. In fact, American Indians have made tremendous advances when outside of national-level politics.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860526

File: 3eed258754921ea⋯.jpg (119.58 KB,1280x720,16:9,Martin_Luther_King_Los_Ang….jpg)

File: d07df0fe6e8e9c7⋯.jpg (124.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Joe_Biden_talks_with_child….jpg)

>>18860523

2/2

Conversely, the US model Australian voice proponents might look to is the one they do not. Enslaved African-Americans were not liberated by treating them as a special class of citizen, with a niche carved out in the constitution.

Black men were guaranteed suffrage by a constitutional amendment (the 15th in 1870), which said their “race, colour or previous condition of servitude” was irrelevant to their political status. Southern Democrats quickly reimposed racial profiling, for another century. But the colourblind constitution was born. It was the key principle underpinning Martin Luther King’s civil rights movement in the 1950 and ’60s. It could be a useful model for proponents of the voice.

Instead, too much racial truth-telling in Australia perpetuates an already skewed American racial narrative. When George Floyd was killed by a bad cop in Minneapolis in 2020, this was treated not as an isolated episode but as evidence of a systemic racism of which Australia was a part.

People of colour have endured horrific prejudice in the respective histories of Australia and the US, from massacres to slavery. But this white-on-black narrative – once vital – is increasingly a caricature that elides the more widespread problem of intra-racial crime. In US cities and Australian outback communities, black-on-black violence now dwarfs that which may have a racist, “white supremacist” motivation.

The paying of reparations to “repair” the damage this white supremacy has wrought has sensible adherents in the US. Increasingly, it is part of debates over treaty here. But their restorative power is contested. Republicans deride how Democratic states (and their taxpayers) are contemplating paying money (for sins they did not commit) to African-Americans (who did not experience them).

Similar attempts at financial reconciliation are hardly new in Australia. Its sceptics call it “sit down” money (as in “sit down and shut up”). How any American state could do this and not encounter stiff resistance from other identity groups (with competing claims of unjust treatment) will be an object lesson for race politics in Australia. The sheer variety of racisms and campaigns against them in the US, across centuries, makes this nation a tricky one to emulate. The US constitution is set up to protect not racial rights but unalienable, individual ones.

To racialise US politics is to undo the best hope America has for racial reconciliation: the post-civil war constitution. To further entrench race as a special category in the Australian Constitution invites the turmoil – perhaps in miniature, but turmoil nonetheless – of the American experiment.

Timothy J Lynch is professor of American politics at the University of Melbourne.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/usstyle-treaties-in-australia-will-only-entrench-racial-turmoil/news-story/b39f57e9d45a727b56076052993a5a0d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860597

File: 7d17aff6a9e9838⋯.jpg (173.19 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Stewart_Rankin.jpg)

File: 367426721b7c81a⋯.jpg (943.71 KB,825x2324,825:2324,JN_2.jpg)

>>18676743

Indigenous man condemns voice no campaign for claiming he is Vincent Lingiari’s grandson

Stewart Lingiari says he’s ‘humiliated’ after Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine misidentify him as grandson of the land rights leader to promote no campaign

Josh Butler and Lorena Allam - 16 May 2023

1/2

An Indigenous man incorrectly identified by the voice referendum no campaign as “Vincent Lingiari’s grandson” says he is not related to the land rights leader and feels “humiliated” by the way his image has been used.

No voice leader Warren Mundine has stood by his campaign’s claims, claiming that Stewart Lingiari had described himself as Vincent’s grandson in a “cultural kinship” sense, rather than directly.

Indigenous Australians minister Linda Burney said the incident raised “real questions” about the credibility of her opponents.

Mundine and shadow Indigenous Australians minister Jacinta Price, the main spokespeople for the campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament, claimed in social media posts last month that Vincent’s grandson was “voting no” in the referendum.

Vincent Lingiari led the Wave Hill walk-off of Indigenous stockmen in the Northern Territory, a key event in the Aboriginal land rights movement. In 1975 he was immortalised in an iconic photo, as prime minister Gough Whitlam poured sand into his hand to represent the handing back of land to the Gurindji people.

In a reply on 22 April to a tweet from Indigenous Australians minister Linda Burney quoting a supporter of the voice, Price wrote: “Vincent Lingiari’s grandson thinks otherwise”.

Price included a screenshot from the website for no campaign Fair Australia showing Stewart Lingiari beside a quote saying: “I don’t want you to look at me differently. That’s why I’m voting no”.

Mundine, leader of the Recognise A Better Way campaign, tweeted the same screenshot on his account 40 minutes later, writing: “Vincent Lingiari’s grandson is voting No!”

Speaking to Guardian Australia, Stewart confirmed he was not related to Vincent Lingiari, and had been given that surname when he was adopted as a child.

“I’m not from that family. If they had asked me directly, I would have told them I’m not his grandson but they never asked me,” he said.

He claimed he had not given permission for his image to be used in this way and felt “humiliated” by the episode.

“Now I hear my picture is all over social media. It’s very wrong what they did, I want it to stop, I want them to take it down.”

Stewart also said he did not claim to be a grandson of the land rights leader.

Members of the Lingiari family told Guardian Australia they were aware of the posts. One of Vincent Lingiari’s grandchildren said they knew of Stewart but that he wasn’t a relative.

Stewart Lingiari lives in Ngukurr, a small community south east of Katherine. The Lingiari family say they are from Kalkarindji, a community more than 770 km or 12 hours’ drive away.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860599

File: 3d53c1e6f1ac645⋯.jpg (342.8 KB,825x1027,825:1027,NWMAO_1.jpg)

>>18860597

2/2

The misidentification was revealed by RMIT FactLab, a fact-checking unit based at RMIT University, which published an article on Monday quoting Stewart Lingiari as saying he wasn’t related to Vincent. Stewart was quoted in the article saying he didn’t oppose the voice, and claimed the quote attributed to him was “what the cameraman told me to say”.

Stewart’s photo and quote appears on a list of eight people speaking against the voice on Fair Australia’s website. Price’s photo and quote is first, while Stewart’s is fifth. Fair Australia’s website does not claim he is Vincent Lingiari’s grandson.

The photo was taken during a trip to Canberra where he met Price and Mundine, as part of a traditional owners group from the Millwarparra Aboriginal Corporation to discuss his home town Ngukurr. The group met opposition leader Peter Dutton on the visit.

But Mundine insisted his description was accurate, claiming that Stewart Lingiari had described himself as Vincent’s grandson in a “cultural kinship” sense, not in a direct relative sense.

“Kinship structure doesn’t mean you have to be blood related in Aboriginal communities. We have many fathers, mothers, children, grandparents. I have grandchildren but they’re not my blood relations,” Mundine said.

“When [Stewart] spent two days with me, I understood that to be a kinship relationship [with Vincent]. Not a grandson like in white man country, but that’s how he was introduced to me. I understood that, I understand cultural kinship.”

Mundine was critical of the factcheck article, claiming: “it’s time some of these people learned about Aboriginal culture.”

Asked about Stewart’s claim he was given a script to read, Mundine responded: “I categorically say that isn’t true.”

“We asked everyone to put their point of view across. There was no paperwork there, they were asked to say what they believe,” he said.

Price’s office was contacted for comment. Fair Australia directed inquiries to Mundine’s comments.

Burney said the issue “raises real questions about the credibility of the no campaign.”

“It appears that some people have been misled into saying things on camera about constitutional recognition by the no campaign,” she told Guardian Australia.

“How low can the no campaign go?” she said. “The no campaign have serious questions to answer.”

Marcus Stewart, a campaigner for the yes vote, called it “appalling behaviour”.

“They shouldn’t be treating elders this way,” he said.

“I call on the no campaign to take down any misleading materials on their website or on social media, and promise never to do it again. Warren Mundine and Jacinta Price need to show some respect towards our elders.”

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/16/indigenous-man-condemns-voice-no-campaign-leaders-for-wrongly-using-his-image

https://twitter.com/JNampijinpa/status/1649672176092725248

https://twitter.com/nyunggai/status/1649682374249299969

https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/factlab-meta/man-wrongly-portrayed-as-grandson-of-vincent-lingiari

https://www.fairaustralia.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860644

File: d16249103061862⋯.jpg (1.25 MB,3000x2105,600:421,The_Brumbies_want_to_stay_….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18855259

>>18840266

‘Why be divisive?’ Rugby wrestles with the Voice to parliament

Georgina Robinson - May 16, 2023

Rugby Australia is facing pressure from within to take a neutral stance on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, with at least one Super Rugby club urging the governing body not to mix sport and politics.

Brumbies chairman Matthew Nobbs said the ACT Rugby board had taken the unanimous view that the club should not take a position on the matter and hoped RA would do the same.

“It was agreed unanimously by our board that we don’t think politics should play a part in sport and it’s an individual’s preference,” Nobbs said.

“There’s no way in the world that we would muzzle our players, they will be free to express themselves as they wish, but we do not believe it is the Brumbies’ role to support a position.”

Rugby, along with cricket and netball, is one of the last major professional and participation sports not to have voiced its support for the yes campaign ahead of a referendum on the matter that will be held later this year.

Despite reports earlier this year the governing bodies making up the Coalition of Major Professional and Participation Sports had given an undertaking to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese they would support the yes campaign, RA appears in no rush to go public with a stance.

The organisation has sent correspondence to its member unions asking them for feedback and sent the following statement to this masthead: “RA is committed to the reconciliation process. We are discussing the matter internally and remain in the process of engaging with our stakeholders, including our First Nations Committee.”

A ring-around of the Super Rugby clubs on Monday found four of the five professional teams had not yet raised the issue with their playing groups, despite its prominence on the national agenda. Queensland Rugby could not be reached for comment.

Further discussions with club officials and administrators, who did not want to comment publicly, indicated some supported making a statement in support of the Voice, while a minority - including the Brumbies - felt strongly about steering clear of the matter. The Rugby Union Players’ Association did not return this masthead’s calls.

Nobbs said the Brumbies board had discussed the matter twice and was firm in its opinion, but emphasised that wanting to stay neutral as an organisation was not the same as supporting the no campaign.

“We have an extremely strong association with Indigenous people. We run out in an Indigenous jumper once or twice a year, our training gear is closely aligned to indigenous themes and [winger] Andy Muirhead is a great role model for Indigenous players and the community,” he said.

Another Super Rugby source said they were worried the issue would bring more division in the game.

“Why does Rugby Australia have to be involved in politics? Why does any sport have to be,” they said. “People go and enjoy, consume and follow sport because it’s a break from the usual rigmarole. Why be divisive?”

The news came after the NRL last week spoke out in support of the voice to parliament, joining Football Australia, Tennis Australia and the Australian Olympic Committee as either explicitly backing the yes campaign or reiterating their support for the Uluru statement from the heart, which calls for an Indigenous voice in the constitution.

The AFL has not formally backed the yes campaign but is widely expected to, with each club encouraged to formulate their own position and report it back into head office.

In a statement on Tuesday morning, the NRL said it was “committed to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice”.

“True change comes through listening, learning and taking action – and we encourage everyone in the rugby league community to get informed by the facts, and use their voice, so that we can move forward together,” a spokesperson said.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/why-be-divisive-rugby-wrestles-with-the-voice-to-parliament-20230515-p5d8fx.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860648

File: 43aa29c185f2eb0⋯.jpg (111.9 KB,1200x675,16:9,Brumbies_chairman_Matt_Nob….jpg)

File: aef5b4f95a9894c⋯.jpg (107.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Brumbies_chairman_Matt….jpg)

>>18860644

I was wrong on Indigenous voice to parliament: Brumbies rugby boss Matthew Nobbs apologises

JESSICA HALLORAN and ED BOURKE - MAY 17, 2023

ACT Brumbies chairman ­Matthew Nobbs, who says politics and sport don’t mix, has apologised after failing to consult key stakeholders, including the rugby club’s playing group, before commenting on the Indigenous voice to parliament.

Late on Tuesday, Mr Nobbs released an apology statement after he publicly said the Brumbies board had taken the unanimous view that the club should not take a position on the voice and hoped Rugby Australia would do the same.

The Super Rugby club chair said he should not have made the comments without consulting the players and the club’s Indigenous cultural advisory group on the issue of constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians.

“I want to make it clear that this is our position as the ­Brumbies’ board of directors, and not that of Rugby Australia,” Mr Nobbs said.

“It has been the board of ­directors’ position that it is not the organisation’s place to advocate on matters such as a public referendum, despite our own personal feelings on the matter.

“However, it was not my place to make public comment on this position until fully consulting with the playing group and the club’s Indigenous cultural advisory group and for that I can only hold my hand up and apologise.”

Prior to this, Mr Nobbs had said the ACT Rugby board, which oversees the Super Rugby club, would not engage in a position on the voice. “It was agreed unanimously by our board that we don’t think politics should play a part in sport and it’s an individual’s preference,” Mr Nobbs had told The Sydney Morning Herald.

“There’s no way in the world that we would muzzle our players – they will be free to express themselves as they wish – but we do not believe it is the Brumbies’ role to support a position.”

Rugby Australia and the AFL are yet to make a statement on the voice to ­parliament. The National Rugby League last week publicly supported the voice, joining Football Australia, Tennis Australia and the Australian Olympic Committee in pushing for constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians.

Outgoing AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan said on Tuesday the league must take a stance on the voice because it is a “community organisation”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/i-was-wrong-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-brumbies-rugby-boss-matthew-nobbs-apologises/news-story/fb00f966b8ffed02f425901fcd41aded

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860685

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18676828

Julian Assange’s father speaks on his battle to free his son | 7.30

ABC News In-depth

May 16, 2023

For supporters of Julian Assange, the planned visit next week by President Biden is an opportunity to focus attention on Assange's continued imprisonment in the UK and potential extradition to the US.

John Shipton is Julian Assange's father, and he speaks to Sarah Ferguson about his fight to free his son.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5zx4PYRcmA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860707

File: d2f000bd6ec5865⋯.jpg (70.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Director_of_Public_Prosecu….jpg)

File: bef787162c72755⋯.jpg (102.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_walks_out_o….jpg)

File: e4dfecf13e550c9⋯.jpg (83.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,Katy_Gallagher_holds_a_pre….jpg)

>>18708667

Did Shane Drumgold succumb to #MeToo zealotry in the Bruce Lehrmann case?

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - MAY 17, 2023

1/2

The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions has made some wild claims about political conspiracies between the Morrison government and the Australian Federal Police, between senior ministers and Bruce Lehrmann’s defence team, and between the AFP and defence lawyers.

If valid, these very serious claims would destroy our trust in the proper administration of justice. Therefore, claims of this gravity must be supported by evidence.

Yet Shane Drumgold’s claims were not supported by evidence. They were so manifestly unmeritorious that Drumgold admitted last week he was mistaken about political interference in the investigation of Lehrmann.

The lack of evidence to support Drumgold’s allegations of political interference by the then government must, invariably, lead us to ask why on earth the DPP made these claims.

Was he so determined to secure a successful conviction that he was willing to put these serious claims about political conspiracies to the jury without any evidence apart from Brittany Higgins’s claims? If so, why was the DPP so determined? What motivated him?

During the first week of the Sofronoff board of inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system, Drumgold admitted to many errors and misjudgments during his handling of the prosecution and trial of Lehrmann, as well as events after the mistrial.

He admitted to potentially misleading the court, and for paying insufficient attention to the presumption of innocence.

Political interference claim

It’s high time we turned the question of political interference in the prosecution of Lehrmann on its head and asked whether the DPP’s judgment was affected by the political whirlwinds that engulfed this national scandal.

These forces were amplified by the politics of the #MeToo movement, where advocates have given, and continue to give, short shrift to principles of due process, the presumption of innocence and a fair trial. That background is beyond question.

In opposition, Labor pursued the rape complaint for political purposes. It did so ruthlessly, day in and day out, especially targeting Linda Reynolds, Scott Morrison and even its own senator, Kimberley Kitching. The Australian understands that text messages between Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz, record their contact with Labor senator Katy Gallagher about the politics of using this rape allegation against the Coalition government.

Sharaz was also caught – during a recording for Higgins’s interview on The Project – mentioning the political timing and his good friend, understood to be Gallagher. The Australian understands that other messages between Higgins and Sharaz mention Higgins’s contact with Labor MP Tanya Plibersek. This was before Lehrmann being charged, raising the question of how far these potent political forces extended.

The pressures were so pervasive that Morrison apologised to Higgins in parliament, joining the media and political forces that daily undermined the principles that underpin our criminal justice system, including the presumption of innocence.

The question on many people’s minds is: Why did Drumgold make so many profound errors of judgment? Was Drumgold ill-suited to exercise the power and duties that attach to a DPP, a position where a person is entrusted with the solemn, careful task of administering justice?

Others may ask whether the roiling political forces, fuelled by federal Labor and the media, to weaponise a rape allegation also ensnared Drumgold in some way, affecting his judgment, from time to time, as minister of justice.

For example, did these political whirlwinds affect Drumgold’s judgment about prosecuting Lehrmann given grave concerns among senior AFP officers that there was not enough evidence to charge Lehrmann?

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860711

File: 617c4711406d8fc⋯.jpg (124 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_with_her_….jpg)

File: 375688c0aa1fac0⋯.jpg (107.63 KB,768x1024,3:4,Lisa_Wilkinson_and_Brittan….jpg)

>>18860707

2/2

Brittany Higgins’ inconsistencies

Did these political forces affect Drumgold’s judgment when he made brief and dismissive comments to Lisa Wilkinson when she sought his advice about her Logies speech? Did those political forces affect Drumgold’s other decisions, including: when he told ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum that the section of a proofing note concerning his comments to Wilkinson were contemporaneous, and created by his junior solicitor, when he knew that neither of these things were true; when he decided to target Aaron Patrick’s book Ego, about Malcolm Turnbull, but not other media that mentioned the Higgins rape allegation; when he dismissed AFP concerns about Higgins’s inconsistencies; when he fought to keep police material from the defence; when he claimed privilege over a document even though he had not read it; when he provided wording to a junior solicitor that resulted in an affidavit used to oppose disclosure, that the DPP agreed last week had the potential to mislead McCallum?

The list goes on. Did the heated and impassioned political environment affect Drumgold’s decision to treat Fiona Brown, arguably the most important witness in the trial, so poorly that she wrote a letter of complaint to the Bar Association earlier this year, and has rejected his claims about her at the inquiry last week?

Did Labor’s weaponisation of this emerging national scandal play a part in Drumgold’s claim, put to the jury – with no evidence – that there were “strong political forces at play in the period immediately after the events, through the election and beyond” and that “from the evidence and actions of Senator Reynolds during this trial those same political forces were still a factor”?

In other words, did Drumgold behave, at times, more like a Labor politician than an objective and fair-minded minister of justice?

Did political forces play a part in Drumgold’s extraordinary and emotional letter to AFP boss Neil Gaughan in November last year alleging that police had undermined the prosecution and trial of Lehrmann, again with not a skerrick of evidence?

Did political influences come into play when Drumgold decided to release that letter to The Guardian, earning himself a media medal for the fastest Freedom of Information response – so fast that names were not redacted and people mentioned in the letter were not consulted, as required by FOI laws.

That was such a dodgy decision that the DPP admits in his inquiry statement that, following a report by the ACT Ombudsman, he apologised to the AFP and instituted a training course for his executives “including myself”.

Did political forces play a part in his highly controversial speech in early December last year when he praised Higgins when announcing he would not retry Lehrmann? In the inquiry he admitted he didn’t think enough about the impact of that statement on the defendant’s right to the presumption of innocence.

The #MeToo factor

What on earth explains the long list of rash and ill-conceived decisions by the DPP? Was it #MeToo zealotry? Did political pressures ensnare him? Incompetence?

Any mix of these possible factors is a dangerous concoction in the hands of a DPP who exercises the power and authority of the state against individual citizens.

The questions go on. Did any of these factors impair his directions to junior staff? Did the power imbalance between him and his staff lead to poor decision-making?

Did the DPP have any contact with Labor MPs, federally or in the ACT, about this scandal? If so, to what effect? If there was no direct communication, what role, if any, did Labor’s pursuit of the rape allegation for political purposes play in the DPP’s decisions?

One of the most important tasks for Walter Sofronoff KC will be determining the motivations of the DPP, especially when poor decisions were made. That means answering questions as to what role, if any, political forces played in the poor decisions by the DPP during this debacle.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/political-conspiracy-its-time-to-ask-if-political-forces-affected-drumgolds-judgment/news-story/3669d82a8a4333a0ad6308d204635771

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860738

File: b7421bf71d67ee0⋯.jpg (4.89 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Roughly_one_in_every_three….jpg)

File: f42182c93b0cdf1⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Ramila_Chanisheff_from_the….jpg)

File: be78aaeef389e4b⋯.jpg (449.78 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Estimates_suggest_more_tha….jpg)

File: 8675168886bf444⋯.jpg (1.39 MB,3032x2283,3032:2283,Chinese_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

How 'dark underbelly' and forced labour is helping to fuel Australia's love affair with cheap solar

Daniel Mercer - 17 May 2023

1/2

Take a walk down any typical suburban Australian street, and chances are you'll see solar panels on someone's roof, probably on many roofs.

Over the past 15 years, Australia's love affair with solar has known few bounds.

There are now more than three million installations on household rooftops across the country, enabling ever greater numbers of Australians to supply their own clean, sustainable power.

But when Ramila Chanisheff looks up, she doesn't necessarily see a symbol of renewable energy.

She sees the oppression of her people.

"It is a bitter feeling … when you see them," Ms Chanisheff said.

"I absolutely see the separation, the tears … the human rights abuses when I look at solar panels."

Ms Chanisheff is an ethnic Uyghur hailing from the north-western Chinese province of Xinjiang, or East Turkistan as she calls it.

Xinjiang is one of the world's biggest producers of polysilicon, a crucial ingredient in modern-day solar panels.

About 45 per cent of the world's supply comes from the province, where metallurgical grade silicon is crushed and purified in huge factories.

But researchers and human rights activists claim those factories are also home to the widespread use of forced Uyghur labour.

Ms Chanisheff says getting direct accounts from affected workers is hard because of what she says is a vast orchestrated crackdown on Uyghurs by Beijing.

Clouds gather over sunny story

But she says many people in the Uyghur diaspora in Australia and elsewhere in the world know of family members or friends caught up in the industry.

"The Uyghurs that live in Australia, they know their families are in these labour camps working for the solar panel industry," she said.

"But they're unwilling to speak up due to further persecution of their family members."From an almost non-existent base 20 years ago, China's solar industry has grown to become the world's dominant supplier of panels.

In polysilicon, China accounts for almost 90 per cent of production, having crushed competitors including the US during its rise.

China's success has been a boon for consumers, who have benefited from sharp falls in the price of solar panels.

But ethical questions about parts of the industry in China appear to be growing.

Despite insistences by Beijing that its policies in Xinjiang are aimed at countering terrorism and alleviating poverty, many remain unconvinced.

Nicholas Aberle, the director of energy generation and storage at the Clean Energy Council, says the reports of human rights abuses in the solar supply chain are a worry.

Dr Aberle said while "this is not an issue peculiar to solar", consumers and governments could not afford to turn a blind eye.

"We condemn modern slavery and forced labour," Dr Aberle said.

"It's not something that anyone wants to see anywhere in the world or involved in any of the products that they're purchasing.

"Unfortunately, there is some quite good evidence that this is occurring in Xinjiang in Western China."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860743

File: dcf1b583e814d6d⋯.jpg (1.7 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Chinese_authorities_have_e….jpg)

File: 0fba97049354811⋯.jpg (505.19 KB,1341x893,1341:893,Capacity_from_large_scale_….jpg)

File: 4e0b0c5f38c9422⋯.jpg (55.85 KB,1202x710,601:355,China_s_stranglehold_over_….jpg)

File: 754a5ba8455e4df⋯.jpg (1.18 MB,3500x2333,3500:2333,China_has_come_from_nowher….jpg)

>>18860738

2/2

Claims labour coercion rife

Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge said defining the use of Uyghur labour in the solar industry was difficult because workers, at least notionally, had a choice about whether to participate in it.

But Mr Shoebridge said the choice often seemed to involve working in the factories "for long hours and low rates of pay" or drawing the ire of authorities.

As a result, he said many workers were effectively "coerced contractors".

"Really, the Xinjiang economy is propped up by cheap Uyghur labour," Mr Shoebridge said.

On top of this, Mr Shoebridge noted Xinjiang's polysilicon producers also relied on cheap, heavily subsidised coal power to maintain their cost advantage.

"It's an underbelly of the solar panel industry," he said.

"People feel very virtuous slapping these solar panels on their roofs.

"But if they understood the industry supply chain and its entanglement in the rather nasty human rights abuses and dirty coal in Xinjiang, they wouldn't feel quite so happy when the sun shone on their solar panels."

Mr Shoebridge said that apart from the ethical questions surrounding Australia's demand for cheap Chinese solar panels, there were big energy security implications.

"This stranglehold that the Chinese government and companies are building over the renewable energy supply chain will give them a lot more power to coerce countries and populations that are dependent on them than the Russians have been able to exert with their energy supply into Europe," he said.

China the 'Saudi Arabia' of solar

Dr Aberle agreed with Mr Shoebridge's assessment of the situation.

As a first step, Dr Aberle said consumers should be given more information about the origins of their solar panels.

In the longer term, he said Australia should look to diversify its supply, including by bringing some manufacturing onshore.

"Quite aside from the issue of modern slavery, there are just supply chain risks of having so many of your supply chain eggs in one geographic basket," he said.

Llewelyn Hughes, from the Australian National University's Crawford School of Public Policy, said the massive growth forecast for the industry would provide plenty of opportunities for other countries.

Dr Hughes said global solar panel production capacity was currently about 190 gigawatts a year but this was forecast to soar to 630GW a year by 2030 under International Energy Agency modelling.

Despite this, he said Australia could not wean itself off a reliance on China easily, at least in the short term.

"We are going to be completely reliant on China for the supply of solar production in the coming number of years," Dr Hughes said.

"This is an enormous global industry and moving the needle in terms of the structure of supply chains is not something you can do overnight."

Dr Hughes also warned against measures such as tariffs that would unnecessarily push up the costs of solar panels, undermining efforts to decarbonise the economy.

Diversification, but mind the costs

And he doesn't think Australia can hope to compete with China in mass manufacturing, noting that even powerhouses such as Japan and Germany had come off second best in solar.

"It's all hands to the wheel, not only in China but elsewhere," Dr Hughes said.

"There is space for the diversification of supply chains but the key is you've got to do it in the right way.

"What we've seen so far is the use of trade restrictions.

"The Europeans have used trade restrictions, the US has used trade restrictions — both under Republican and Democratic presidents.

"And the effect of those is to increase the price of imports relative to domestic production.

"That may increase at the amount of domestic production but it comes at the cost of increasing the modules themselves and that really hurts our ability to decarbonise as quickly as we need to."

For Uyghur leader Ms Chanisheff, a better balance needs to be struck.

"For those who advocate for solar panels for a cleaner environment, or cleaner air, and I also advocate for that, at what cost?"

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-17/the-dirty-secret-behind-australias-cheap-solar/102288954

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860751

File: 239a966e5b91ecb⋯.jpg (73.58 KB,1200x720,5:3,Eleven_Chinese_institutes_….jpg)

>>18770941

Eleven Chinese institutes welcome Australian scholar’s planned Xinjiang visit in joint letter

GT staff reporters - May 15, 2023

Eleven Chinese academic institutes jointly released a letter of support to Maureen A Huebel, an Australian scholar, who has come under attack from anti-China forces after announcing her plan to visit China's Xinjiang region in 2024, the Global Times has learned from related academic institutes on Monday.

Recently, Huebel has been subject to cyber-violence by anti-China forces after revealing her plans to go China's Xinjiang region to conduct research.

"As scholars, we felt sympathy, regret and anger for what happened to her. At the same time, we are also pleased to see that universities and research institutes from various regions of China who have been engaged in Xinjiang-related research for a long time have unanimously stood up to support Ms. Maureen Huebel," read the joint letter.

Since Huebel announced on Twitter in March that she was planning to go to Xinjiang in 2024 to research poverty alleviation, she has been hounded by trolls and attacked by people insulting her on Twitter, even receiving death threats.

At the end of April, the Institute of China's Borderland Studies at Zhejiang Normal University and the Institute for Communication and Borderland Governance of Guangzhou-based Jinan University openly welcomed Huebel and expressed their willingness to assist the Australian with her research in the Xinjiang region. Later, several more academic institutes in the Xinjiang region and across China also extended their welcome, with 11 jointly releasing the latest letter.

In recent years, some foreign research institutions and so-called scholars have distorted the facts under the banner "academia" and wantonly manipulated Xinjiang-related issues. Either out of ideological prejudice or out of self-interest, they are all willing to manufacture and spread disinformation about China's Xinjiang, said the joint letter.

It is more infuriating that any scholar who maintains an objective attitude in the field of Xinjiang-related research will become the target of attacks and slander by anti-China forces, which fully demonstrates that the Cold War mentality and academic politicization are blurring the boundaries between politics and academia, fact and fiction, challenging the bottom line and dignity of academia, and threatening the facts and truth we all pursue, the joint letter noted.

In the joint letter, the eleven academic institutes across China welcomed Huebel and expressed their willingness to share the first-hand materials they have studied on the Xinjiang region's history, ethnicity, religion and other fields with global scholars.

In an article Huebel wrote to the Global Times in March, she stated reasons for her interest in the Xinjiang region when she noticed rising levels of Australian poverty and homelessness. Xinjiang was identified as among the fastest GDP growth of all Chinese provinces and regions.

However, when she tried to conduct preliminary research on Twitter, she came under fierce attack. She contacted Adrian Zenz, a notorious anti-China "scholar," and asked him for field research notes and methodology and published peer-reviewed journals, only to find herself blocked, she said.

"The more opposition I got, the more determined I became to forge a path to complete my project. I was blocking trolls that did not contribute to the research, sometimes 10 at a time, who ganged up on me, to what is called a Twitter pile-on," Huebel wrote.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290735.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860771

File: d5130c6a87aa199⋯.jpg (38.26 KB,482x319,482:319,A_screenshot_of_Maureen_Hu….jpg)

>>18770941

West's 'academic freedom' only a myth

ZHANG ZHOUXIANG - 2023-05-17

What Australian scholar Maureen A. Huebel experienced recently is an example of how all talk of academic freedom in the West is just a myth.

Huebel said on her Twitter handle that she planned a trip to the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region to "study how the Uygurs have contributed to the substantial growth in Xinjiang GDP and look at their population growth", but was bombarded with criticism, with some commenting her account was "fake" and others accusing her of spreading "propaganda".

In fact, her handle was briefly suspended following a complaint by Adrian Zenz, the "scholar" who fabricated "forced labor" lies about Xinjiang. Now her account has been restored but the arguments continue.

Huebel's experience is enough to peel the mask of academic freedom off the face of the West. When Zenz invented "forced labor" lies about Xinjiang, they said he was exercising his "academic freedom" and protected him. But where is this shield of academic freedom when Huebel wants to go there to find the truth for herself? Instead, we see the face of "anti-China propaganda" being fully active now.

Enough debate has taken place about Xinjiang. The local governments in Xinjiang have invited journalists and travelers to visit the place, but a strong political force in the West always tries to prevent anyone from making the trip.

Such bias in the West will harm Xinjiang, as it will stop Xinjiang cotton from being sold in Western countries. Those in the West need to know that such bias will hurt their society even more because it will widen the social divide and blind their own people from having the wisdom to know what's true and what's false.

https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202305/17/WS646439c7a310b6054fad367b.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18860803

File: 9a083d130c3a25d⋯.jpg (327.98 KB,1138x969,1138:969,Donald_Trump_Jr_LIVE_.jpg)

File: 123590e15c0a771⋯.jpg (98.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_President_Donald_Trump_….jpg)

>>18696839

Donald Trump Jr to bring ‘voice of Trumpism’ to Australia

The eldest son of the former US president is planning a whirlwind tour of Australia in July - and first on his list is taking aim at “woke identity politics”. See where he’ll be, and when.

James Morrow - May 17, 2023

Look out Australia - Donald Trump Jr is coming to town.

The son of the 45th president of the United States, who has been described as “the voice of undiluted Trumpism”, said he will be making a three city speaking tour of Australia this July to talk about the “disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture … that has clearly taken hold (in Australia).”

Organisers said they expected that the tour, which will run from July 9-11 and hit Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane, would draw “significant” attention due to Mr Trump’s “polarising” reputation and “divisive, anti-politically correct stances”.

Mr Trump said that he looked forward to returning to Australia, which he visited in his youth.

“I actually spent a month backpacking around Australia in my (third) year of university and absolutely loved it,” Mr Trump said.

“It’s a great country full of great people which is why it is so sad to see what is happening there.”

“I have a huge fanbase in Australia and after speaking with some of them it’s clear the same disease of wok identity politics and cancel culture that’s crippled the US has clearly taken hold there.”

“It’s not good. It is the biggest existential threat we face in the West and is literally the decay of Western society,” he said.

Along with being an author, businessman, and TV personality, Mr Trump also has a strong social media presence with 6.4 million followers on Instagram where he is known as the “Meme Wars General”.

He has been one of his father’s staunchest defenders on social media, amplifying official Trump campaign messaging and condemning the recent indictment of the former president by New York prosecutor Alvin Bragg.

“This is political weaponisation of our government against its citizens and against political opposition and resistance like we’ve never seen before,” he said on Instagram around the time of the indictment.

“This is the kind of stuff that would make Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, and other sociopaths blush.”

Mr Trump’s tour is sponsored by Turning Point, the same company that brought out UK Brexit leader Nigel Farage last year.

A spokesman for the organiser said, “We are thrilled to welcome Donald Trump Jr to Australia for his first speaking tour.”

“As a controversial, outspoken figure, we believe he will offer an exciting and unique perspective on a range of issues that are important to everyday Australians.”

Tickets to the tour are available at trumplive.com.au

https://www.trumplive.com.au/

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/donald-trump-jr-to-bring-voice-of-trumpism-to-australia/news-story/b9218f4b102dcc462e504a6cf2677ed5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865735

File: 42927796e768017⋯.jpg (202.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lidia_Thorpe_takes_part_ma….jpg)

File: 0d35228ce698b24⋯.jpg (56.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Annastacia_Palaszczuk_spea….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18855233

>>18860464

As the penny drops, so does support for the Indigenous voice to parliament

PETA CREDLIN - MAY 18, 2023

1/2

The campaign for an Indigenous voice to be entrenched in the Constitution is now in deep trouble. The latest Resolve polling shows the Yes vote has dropped from 64 per cent late last year, to 58 per cent earlier this year, to just 53 per cent now.

The raw figures are 39 per cent opposition to the voice, 18 per cent undecided and just 44 per cent support. What’s more, according to the pollsters, some states are shifting from Yes to No. This matters because a successful referendum has to be carried by a majority of the states and a major­ity of voters overall.

This tends to confirm last month’s Morgan poll, showing a seven percentage point drop in the Yes vote to 46 per cent; and a nine percentage point rise in the No vote to 39 per cent. In two states, Queensland (46-41) and in South Australia (50-39), the No vote was actually in front. Only in Victoria, said Morgan, was there still majority support for Yes. As well, the Essential poll has Yes down six points to 59 and No up six points to 41 since February. This polling is remarkably similar to polling on becoming a republic, five months out from the 1999 referendum, which ultimately went down in every state and 55-45 nationally.

From the beginning, No campaigners have been telling me that poll support for the voice was “a mile wide but an inch deep”.

No campaigners say voter concerns that the voice may be divisive and that there’s not enough detail are being intensified once people are clear that the voice involves changing the Constitution – which, unlike legislative change, is permanent.

As well, especially among the overseas born, voters are starting to ask why this generation of Australians – who have never been responsible for mistreating Indigenous people – should have to make it up to current generations of Indigenous people.

This will get only worse as more questions emerge that voice proponents can’t (or won’t) answer. And while just about everyone would be happy to see Indigenous people formally recognised in the Constitution as the First Australians, it’s far from clear that a super-majority of voters are prepared to give the government what amounts to a blank cheque for a change that’s so much more than that.

The government’s insistence that the voice is no more than giving Indigenous people the polite hearing they obviously deserve on matters affecting them is starting to unravel, as the scale of the intended indigenisation starts to become more clear. The voice is just the first demand of the Uluru Statement from the Heart “voice, treaty, truth” to which the Prime Minister says the government is committed “in full”.

Last week, in Queensland, the state Labor government passed legislation enabling treaties to be concluded between the government and up to 150 local Aboriginal groups. This week, as reported in The Australian, the head of the Mithaka Aboriginal Corporation in western Queensland said a treaty between his body and the Queensland government should mandate the right to veto mining projects on traditional land, even though such a right is not available to anyone else.

Under Australian law, sub-surface minerals belong to the Crown and landholders can negotiate over access but have no right to block the exploitation of resources for the country’s benefit, and that of state and federal budgets. Of course, miners already have to negotiate extensively with native title holders if they want to mine on traditional lands, but the head of the Mithaka corporation says Aboriginal people now need an “actual say, not just a tokenistic say” over developments in an area not much smaller than Tasmania.

What’s more, the Queensland minister responsible for treaty negotiations said treaties could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars apiece, reflecting, he said, the devastating impact of British colonisation on the state’s Indigenous people.

Typically, he neglected to mention the much greater upside of settlement for most Aboriginal people; namely, health and education, the rule of law and all the facil­ities of modern life. Notwithstanding the reality that if it wasn’t the British, it would be fanciful to think that Australia would be unsettled today, two centuries on from when the First Fleet arrived.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865740

File: 062079591cf6a47⋯.jpg (179.55 KB,768x1024,3:4,Indigenous_campaigner_Dean….jpg)

File: 2c94f84ef5039b7⋯.jpg (117.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_speaks_du….jpg)

>>18865735

2/2

This treaty talk in Queensland is a good indicator of what to expect everywhere should the voice pass.

On Sydney radio this week, Yes 23 campaign head Dean Parkin accepted that Aboriginal people had “great expectations” of the voice and had been “talking about treaty for a long time”, and that what happened afterwards would “play out naturally”.

As Parkin said, Aboriginal people “won’t just settle for symbolism”. For instance, the objective of the Mithaka corporation, according to its head, is to be “self-sustaining” and to be able to “employ its (own) people”. That could include ownership of all the mining, pastoral and tourism businesses to which it currently contracts workers. But that would turn them into an Indigenous version of state-owned enterprises, that are run to employ people, not to make a profit or to deliver a service.

It would be the advent of a quasi-independent Indigenous socialism throughout remote Australia, with the taxpayer, inevitably, required to sustain it. One of the members of the Queensland government’s new Truth and Treaty body, former social justice commissioner Mick Gooda, says it’s “about sovereignty” and that “just about every treaty party” would push for joint decision-making on elements of government services, such as education, health, youth justice and housing. It could even extend, he said, to police needing to ask local elders to arrest suspects; meaning that, depending on your race, the law of the land applies, or it won’t.

This is an early tremor of the massive change coming down the track. Essentially, as the now ubiquitous reference to First Nations shows, it’s about unwinding two centuries of the sovereignty of the Crown and ensuring that no big decisions can be made in this country without the consent of the Aboriginal people who, it’s now said, never ceded sovereignty and, while definitely “invaded”, were never really conquered. That’s “consent”, not advice, a virtual veto, which tells you why the No vote is increasing as people start to work this out.

If there’s any upside here, a referendum at least gives every Australian a say on what has happened by stealth until now. And anyone who doesn’t like where things are headed – from the permanent flying of the Aboriginal flag coequally with the national flag, to the now routine Indigenous welcomes – notwithstanding all the moral pressure that will be brought to bear, in the privacy of the ballot box they will at last have a chance to vote No.

So far, the government is resisting all entreaties to moderate the voice proposal to give it a better chance of success. At some point, though, Anthony Albanese will have to face up to the fact his proposal for maximalist change is dividing the country and looks increasingly likely to fail. He can’t say he wasn’t warned.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/as-the-penny-drops-so-does-support-for-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c2098a36cb0191748cd04246e7325ca5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865753

File: 8fe9566944d509f⋯.jpg (1002.45 KB,2953x1969,2953:1969,Indigenous_leader_Mick_Goo….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18860464

‘I’m terrified we’ll lose’: Voice advocate pleads for compromise to save referendum

James Massola and Paul Sakkal - May 18, 2023

1/2

Eminent Indigenous leader Mick Gooda says he is terrified the Voice to parliament referendum will fail, and Professor Tom Calma, one of the architects of the proposal, has conceded support for change is not high enough.

But leading referendum backers are calling for calm on the path to winning the battle for Indigenous recognition, following results of a poll, conducted by Resolve Strategic and published in this masthead, that showed a dramatic tightening in the referendum race.

Support for the Voice slid from 58 to 53 per cent over the past month in the crucial “yes or no” question, while opposition to the Voice increased over the same period from 31 to 39 per cent, the poll found.

Gooda, a former human rights commissioner helping lead the Queensland treaty process, was involved in designing the Voice model. He said he was deeply worried about the referendum and urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to intervene by making the proposition less risky for undecided voters.

“I’ve decided to speak out, and I’m sure I will be criticised because I’m beginning to be terrified we’re going to lose this,” he said in an interview.

“It seems the polling is only headed in one way, and that’s down. We need to do something to arrest that slide somehow.”

If the referendum were to fail, Gooda said, he would be “repudiated for all I have done and, as will every other Aboriginal advocate”.

“It’s a rejection. We can’t afford to lose it. I know we’ve compromised all our lives, but right now, we’re right at the pointy end, and if there needs to be a compromise to get over the line, let’s do it.”

Gooda added that Voice campaigners could draw lessons from the events in Queensland last week, when almost every MP in the state voted for a historic treaty bill after a process in which Indigenous advocates did not secure their full set of demands.

“This is a negotiation,” he said, arguing the Voice would still be able to consult with departments and ministers if executive government, a key sticking point for constitutional conservatives, was not inserted into the Constitution.

“If we go for the pure point and lose it, that’s not going to achieve anything.”

Calma, one of the architects of the detailed Voice to parliament report and the Senior Australian of the Year, said Australians needed time to understand the details of the proposal and more information would be coming from the Yes campaign soon.

“It’s concerning that it [support] is not higher, but I think we will see over time that it will increase as more and more people get out there and have a discussion and people’s questions are addressed,” he said. Many Voice advocates are arguing privately that it was only one poll and results will improve as the campaign gains momentum.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865754

File: 92b034297aaf5cd⋯.jpg (825.05 KB,4000x2668,1000:667,Sean_Gordon_chair_of_Uphol….jpg)

>>18865753

2/2

Liberal MP Julian Leeser will move amendments to a government bill this month in a last-ditch attempt to remove the reference to executive government from the constitutional amendment.

“I am concerned about the trend … It’s not just one poll, it’s a trend over time,” he said. “The government needs to change the amendment in order to win the referendum.”

Voice supporter Sean Gordon said the risk of losing the referendum was real and argued the parliamentary inquiry that examined the constitutional wording had failed to offer Albanese a politically viable way to broker a compromise over the wording.

“It’s up to the PM to determine. If it’s not winnable, he needs to make a decision about what is winnable for the Australian people,” said Gordon, who leads the conservative-leaning Indigenous recognition group called Uphold and Recognise.

But Yes alliance campaign director Dean Parkin pushed back against any attempt to change the wording of the constitutional alteration, saying it risked “dragging the debate back into legalese”.

“The more that Australians hear Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people talk about why this is important to them, the more they’ll see this is something that’s going to create practical change for Indigenous people,” he said.

Independent senator Lidia Thorpe, who has been a vocal opponent of the Voice, said the Voice campaign was clearly failing and the government, rather than the No campaign, was responsible.

“I believe it’s got very little to do with any influence of the No campaign and a lot to do with the very substance of the Voice and the actions of the government behind the referendum,” she said.

Labor strategist Kos Samaras argued the Voice campaign seemed to be targeting people who were already voting Yes, rather than undecided voters, and had to shift focus to the outer suburbs.

“When Resolve is giving Labor nearly 60 per cent of the two-party preferred vote and you’re not getting that in the Yes vote then it is clear the situation is pretty grim,” he said.

“There is a group of people out there who don’t necessarily disagree with the Voice. If you sit down and took them through it, they wouldn’t disagree, but it’s not top of mind. They have other concerns in life.”

JWS research’s John Scales said the well-financed Yes campaign should not be underestimated but warned any further slippage in the Yes vote could make undecided voters feel less guilty about voting No.

“You bang away with something with enough money repeatedly and enough people will start to believe it usually,” he said, citing the advertising barrage planned by the Yes campaign.

“They would not want the numbers to get any worse. If it does … then it might create its own momentum. People don’t feel like the bad guy voting No if it is 50-50.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/i-m-terrified-we-ll-lose-voice-advocate-pleads-for-compromise-to-save-referendum-20230517-p5d93f.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865788

File: ca380bbcfe20044⋯.jpg (170.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,AFL_CEO_Gillon_McLachlan_w….jpg)

File: 39bfb1c5cc8b764⋯.jpg (246.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,First_Nations_players_in_t….jpg)

File: df1f4a1a722e435⋯.jpg (1.1 MB,1138x2606,569:1303,Geelong_celebrates_AFL_Sir….jpg)

File: ea2d38d79461b91⋯.jpg (1.23 MB,1138x2740,569:1370,A_Statement_from_the_Essen….jpg)

>>18855259

>>18676743

>>18840266

AFL announces support for First Nations Voice to Parliament

LAUREN WOOD - MAY 18, 2023

The AFL has officially declared its support for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

The league’s commission met on Wednesday and its position was confirmed on Thursday morning, with headquarters firmly backing the push.

“The AFL is privileged to have a long history of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership in our game, from the grassroots in every state and territory, through to the AFL and AFLW competitions,” the league said in a statement.

“Over the past year we have had many discussions on the proposal to recognise a Voice for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in consultation with our clubs, our staff, our players, and the AFL’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Council.

“Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander players have long made a stellar contribution on the footy field. Their off-field contributions are equally valued for the impact they have made on our game and our community.”

The league said while it encouraged “everyone to seek the information they need to form their own views on the referendum, the AFL proudly supports the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian Constitution through the Voice to Parliament”.

Essendon and Geelong are the latest clubs to this week show their support for the Voice, joining West Coast, Collingwood and Richmond in releasing statements backing the yes vote.

Key figures including former prime minister John Howard have expressed their opposition to sporting organisations taking a political stance, but league chief executive Gillon McLachlan said this week that he would have considered it “odd” if the AFL – “as a community organisation” – opted not to express a view.

“Generally I think that we don’t seek to lecture, we don’t wade into every topic, but for those that are relevant … to our supporter base, and to our people who work for the AFL, the people who are members of clubs, people who come to our games, and our playing group, I think it’s important that leadership actually says this is what we stand for, this is what we think,” McLachlan said.

“I also just hope that we don’t get away from the celebration – our Indigenous athletes are such a special part of the game, and what they bring brings people to their feet.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/afl-announces-support-for-first-nations-voice-to-parliament/news-story/5e9f40e63142d991bd6c6c2b167bfe6b

https://www.geelongcats.com.au/news/1333150/geelong-celebrates-afl-sir-doug-nicholls-round

https://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/1332819/a-statement-from-the-essendon-board-first-nations-voice-to-parliament

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865807

File: ab9c86fef0257ec⋯.jpg (164.04 KB,1240x832,155:104,Bradley_Hill_Bobby_Hill_an….jpg)

File: dc4a8e00cdae24e⋯.jpg (189.56 KB,1080x1350,4:5,347618061_197682326482646_….jpg)

File: a5cdf1aac08249d⋯.jpg (500.79 KB,1420x1775,4:5,347618809_277030891341417_….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18865788

>>18860644

>>18860648

‘Let’s get it over the line’: Rugby Australia and AFL back Indigenous voice to parliament

Mike Hytner - 18 May 2023

The AFL and Rugby Australia have become the latest Australian sporting codes to declare support for the yes vote, with both organisations making clear their positions on the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum on Thursday.

In a full-page advertisement taken out in the Nine newspapers, a statement endorsed by RA’s board said it was time to institute a “level playing field” for First Nations people.

The AFL followed suit shortly after, encouraging all involved in the game to seek information on the referendum, and confirming the organisation “proudly supports the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian constitution”.

“The AFL is privileged to have a long history of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership in our game, from the grassroots in every state and territory, through to the AFL and AFLW competitions,” an AFL statement read.

“Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander players have long made a stellar contribution on the footy field. Their off-field contributions are equally valued for the impact they have made on our game and our community.

“While we encourage everyone to seek the information they need to form their own views on the referendum, the AFL proudly supports the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian constitution through the voice to parliament.”

RA’s release carried the headline: “The voice is not about division. It’s about union.”

“If we’re ever going to achieve true union as a nation, we must take every opportunity we have to close the gap which still separates so many of us,” the statement read. “Provision for an Indigenous voice to parliament in our constitution is long overdue. Let’s get it over the line.”

Commonwealth Games Australia also announced it would be advocating for the yes campaign.

“We are committed to taking part in the process, educating ourselves on how this much-needed change to the constitution of Australia intends to enhance the lives of First Nations Australians,” CGA president Ben Houston said at a members’ forum on Thursday.

With the announcements, the AFL, RA and CGA join the NRL and Australian Olympic Committee in explicitly supporting the yes vote, while Football Australia and Tennis Australia have expressed their support for the Uluru statement from the heart, of which the voice is the first component.

It leaves the country’s cricket and netball organisations as the only major sporting bodies to have not committed to a position. Both Cricket Australia and Netball Australia are conducting education processes about the referendum for players and staff.

The AFL and NRL hold their Indigenous rounds this week, and the architects of the Uluru statement from the heart, the Uluru dialogue, welcomed the latest additions to the growing list of sporting bodies to support the voice.

“AFL is among Australia’s most influential sporting codes,” Janine Coombs, Wotjoboluk woman and Uluru Dialogue representative, said. “This endorsement and this week’s Sir Doug Nicholls round will ensure the voice and recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples remains high on our nation’s agenda and in the hearts and minds of Australians.”

“We look forward to this week’s round of sport with the knowledge that the AFL, NRL and Rugby Australia are walking with First Peoples in a movement for a better future.”

Members of the RA board arrived at their position after internal discussions and engaging with various stakeholders, including its First Nations Committee.

“The bottom line is that our constitution still doesn’t recognise the First Peoples of Australia or give them the voice they deserve,” the statement said. “The playing field could still be more level.

“If we’re ever going to achieve true union as a nation, we must take every opportunity we have to close the gap which still separates so many of us. Provision for an Indigenous voice to parliament in our constitution is long overdue.”

The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, hailed RA’s stance, and said Wednesday’s release was “quite a beautiful statement”.

“The ARU deserve I think a great deal of congratulations for doing that as well recognising how important Indigenous players and Indigenous culture has been for that code as well,” Albanese told SEN radio.

The date of the referendum is expected to be in October, not long after the AFL and NRL grand finals.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/may/18/lets-get-it-over-the-line-rugby-australia-backs-indigenous-voice-to-parliament

https://www.facebook.com/AFL/posts/638776834958804

https://www.facebook.com/RugbyAU/posts/565988355682564

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865820

File: 676583e144b8f3b⋯.jpg (105.42 KB,1350x900,3:2,Has_Albanese_misjudged_the….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18860464

OPINION: Has Albanese misjudged the Voice of the Australian people - Yes or No?

David Crowe - May 18, 2023

1/2

The campaign for the Indigenous Voice is in dire need of more time to rethink its strategy in light of growing evidence it is falling behind in the race to a referendum later this year. Time, however, is running out. A critical point is coming in the next few weeks when parliament must decide the reform proposal to put to the Australian people.

Everything turns on a political calculation – not an idealistic policy assessment – about whether to change the proposed model to increase its chance of success. The deadline is June 22, the last day before the winter recess for the Senate to vote on the referendum bill that sets up the public vote in October or November.

This is not an election campaign when policies can be altered at the last minute and revealed a few weeks before polling day. It is a referendum that asks voters to endorse a proposal that is released months earlier and cannot be easily changed. The danger for the Yes camp is that it cements a reform model in June that loses majority support by August and is a smoking ruin by November, with untold damage to reconciliation.

This is a column about the risk of defeat; it is not a prediction of defeat. The Yes campaign is confident that polling from the CT Group – formerly known as Crosby Textor – shows majority support for the change in its current form – recognition of First Nations and a Voice that is enshrined in the constitution to speak to parliament as well as executive government.

But the public polling shows the Voice is sliding towards minority support. The Resolve Political Monitor, published in this masthead on Wednesday, found that support for the Voice fell from 58 to 53 per cent over the past month in the “yes or no” question akin to a referendum. This is part of a broader trend identified by pollster Jim Reed, the director of Resolve Strategic, across 28 published polls. Without a shift in that trend, the No case gains the upper hand in August.

The Yes camp is already advertising to a mass audience – on the theme of recognition, rather than the details of its model – and has campaign leaders in each state and territory. It has 7000 volunteers and is adding more every week. Unfortunately, it does not have enough time to wait and watch the polling.

A decision has to be made about what a Yes vote means. The major dispute is about whether the new body should have a constitutional power to consult to executive government, not just the parliament. This idea goes back a decade and was discussed at length last year, but it only emerged as a flashpoint in the past few months. It has a clear logic: there are real consequences for Indigenous people when officials, rather than politicians, make decisions about basic services. Yet this is a barrier for people who fear the Voice will reach too far into the everyday decisions of the public service.

Anthony Albanese has to make a call. If this was any other policy, the prime minister might make a pragmatic decision to jettison the unpopular parts of the proposal and proceed with what can win the vote. Smart leaders respond without sentiment to hard numbers. In this case, the numbers tell the government to throw the executive government wording overboard and lighten the load for the entire Yes campaign.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865824

File: fe95f3cb62dee1b⋯.jpg (172.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18865820

2/2

The government is unified, so the Voice is not a danger to Albanese as a “wedge” that might divide Labor into rival camps. In fact, most of the dissent is on the Coalition side. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton lost his shadow attorney-general, Julian Leeser, just five weeks ago because Leeser could not support the shadow cabinet decision to oppose the Voice outright.

So this is not a wedge – it’s a squeeze. Albanese is at risk of being slowly compressed between two opposing forces. To his left, the major Indigenous leaders look immoveable on demands including the right to consult with executive government. To his right, the No camp steadily expands. Has he misjudged the mood of the Australian people? The Voice is a new proposition for many voters and nobody can be sure where the centre lies.

A hard decision has to be made before the Senate rises on June 22. The referendum must be held within two to six months of the passage of the law.

There are other options. One is to delay the decision on the referendum bill until parliament sits in early August, but this would drag out the division. Another is to pass the bill in June but decide later to postpone the referendum, although this would advertise the government’s uncertainty about the model.

Albanese cannot make a unilateral change to the Voice. This is a totemic reform for Indigenous leaders, so it would be unthinkable for Labor to embark on changes those leaders cannot accept. Albanese needs their permission for any shift in the model or a delay to the vote.

Perhaps Australians will swing more strongly in favour of the Voice as the referendum nears. Perhaps the soft No voters will not bother to turn up. But why run a risk so great? A defeat would be a catastrophe for reconciliation, so the Yes camp and the government should not leave anything to chance.

The Voice would certainly win greater support without the executive government provision. Leeser says this power could be enacted by legislation rather than written into the constitution. This would lead to a referendum that endorses recognition, empowers the Voice to parliament in the constitution and leaves it to elected legislators to decide how the new body consults with the public service.

Leeser says he will vote Yes even if his model does not prevail, but others are not so invested in this outcome. Writing the executive government provision into legislation, not the constitution, could neutralise a major element of the No campaign.

Albanese has a way to escape the political squeeze if he has permission from Indigenous leaders for a compromise. Right now, those leaders do not think they need to throw anything overboard – and they may be right. But years of work will be lost if the Yes camp and the government gamble badly and end up with nothing.

David Crowe is chief political correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/has-albanese-misjudged-the-voice-of-the-australian-people-yes-or-no-20230517-p5d94z.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865851

File: c3868b6707455ae⋯.jpg (83.23 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Shane_Drumgold_SC_speaking….jpg)

File: 4344cc7617d87be⋯.jpg (109.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

File: 337d7108fdf0871⋯.jpg (75.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_the_….jpg)

File: 1232fe760341375⋯.jpg (137.35 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_arriving_….jpg)

>>18708667

DPP Shane Drumgold ‘on leave’ after Lehrmann inquiry evidence

KRISTIN SHORTEN and REMY VARGA - MAY 18, 2023

The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold has taken sudden leave from his position after five days of bruising evidence about his handling of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation at the Sofronoff inquiry last week.

Mr Drumgold, whose leave started on Tuesday, has been replaced as DPP while the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system is underway.

On Tuesday, the ACT government executive appointed Anthony Williamson SC – the Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions – to act in the position until June 13.

An ACT government spokesperson this morning told The Australian that Mr Drumgold is “on leave at his request”.

The spokesperson said it was not anticipated that Mr Drumgold’s leave would impact his planned return to the witness box next week.

Mr Drumgold declined to comment this morning.

On Friday, ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury declined an invitation to express confidence in the DPP, saying only that the Sofronoff inquiry “should be allowed to continue its work”.

Ms Higgins, a former liberal staffer, alleged Bruce Lehrmann raped her in Senator Linda Reynolds’ ministerial office in the early hours of March 23, 2019 after a night out drinking with colleagues in Canberra.

Mr Lehrmann was later charged with sexual intercourse without consent and pleaded not guilty.

The 29-year-old’s trial was sensationally aborted in October due to juror misconduct and immediately listed for a retrial in February, before Mr Drumgold discontinued proceedings in December over concerns for Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Mr Lehrmann maintains his innocence.

In November Mr Drumgold sent a letter to the ACT’s chief police officer Neil Gaughan alleging police misconduct before and during the prosecution and calling for a public inquiry into how the case was handled.

That letter sparked the inquiry which is being conducted by former Queensland Solicitor-General and eminent retired judge of the Queensland Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, Mr Walter Sofronoff KC.

The first week of public hearings this month focused on the ACT’s chief prosecutor’s conduct before, during and after Mr Lehrmann’s aborted trial in October.

During his evidence last week Mr Drumgold came under fire over multiple issues including his attempt to withhold police investigative review documents from the defence, making misleading statements to Chief Justice Lucy McCallum, reading Ms Higgins’ confidential counselling notes, delivering a speech implying Mr Lehrmann was “really guilty in his view” when he discontinued proceedings and how he handled Lisa Wilkinson’s request for advice about her “hypothetical” Logies acceptance speech.

Mr Drumgold also told the inquiry last week that he believed it was “possible if not ­probable” that there was a ­political conspiracy to stop Mr Lehrmann’s case from proceeding, before backflipping a day later.

Mr Drumgold maintained throughout his evidence last week that he could have obtained a conviction against Mr Lehrmann, even suggesting a single rogue juror was “holding out” for an acquittal while the rest were inclined to convict.

Mr Drumgold has been the DPP since January 2019 and worked at the ODPP since 2002.

Public hearings will resume on Monday when senior police involved in the sexual assault investigation – including Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, Senior Constable Emma Frizzell and Commander Michael Chew – will be called to give evidence.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/dpp-shane-drumgold-on-leave-after-lehrmann-inquiry-evidence/news-story/f561d9c00c6d548a17962e88b6677d78

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865869

File: 5ff23d51113f540⋯.jpg (75.47 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_has_taken_l….jpg)

File: fca4ea00e9ae43c⋯.jpg (87.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Chief_Justice_Lucy_McC….jpg)

File: 6a559d4116985d4⋯.jpg (120.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_maintai….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18865851

Thanks for the break Shane Drumgold, now please don’t come back

CHRIS MERRITT - MAY 18, 2023

1/2

Shane Drumgold KC has done the right thing. He deserves credit for taking four weeks’ leave as Director of Public Prosecutions of the ACT. He would deserve more credit if he never returned.

If he remains the territory’s top prosecutor, there is a risk that criminal justice will suffer.

The evidence before Walter Sofronoff’s inquiry into the handling of the Bruce Lehrmann rape trial shows Drumgold sits at the centre of a network of dysfunctional professional relationships.

The DPP’s relationships with the courts and the police are essential if the justice system is to work. But consider what has come to light at this inquiry.

On the AFP, Drumgold has backflipped on his assertion – made without evidence – that it was “possible if not probable” that political pressure had been brought to bear on AFP commissioner Reece Kershaw to prevent Lehrmann being charged with raping Brittany Higgins.

His own counsel, Mark Tedeschi, KC, has told Sofronoff that the AFP had a “bizarre” approach to whether Lehrmann should be charged; and the attitude of police towards Drumgold was one of “resentment”.

On the courts, Drumgold has admitted he misled Chief Justice Lucy McCallum. The question of whether this was intentional is irrelevant.

Even if he apologises to the court – and that needs to happen – how much weight could the Supreme Court place on future submissions from this DPP?

Consider what happened: Drumgold presented the court with a note of a conversation with journalist Lisa Wilkinson that he said was contemporaneous. It was not. An addendum had been inserted on his instructions.

McCallum relied on that note and issued a judgment criticising Wilkinson for giving a speech praising Higgins that led to a stay of Lehrmann’s trial.

Contemporaneous notes are more reliable than reconstructions. So thanks to Drumgold’s actions, the factual basis for McCallum’s criticism of Wilkinson must now be in doubt.

McCallum’s judgment says Drumgold issued a “clear and appropriate warning” to Wilkinson. Yet did he?

It is beyond dispute that Wilkinson made a speech praising Higgins that led to a stay.

But what is now in doubt, because of Drumgold’s actions, is what the DPP actually told Wilkinson before she delivered that speech.

Sofronoff has before him a letter to Drumgold from Beverley McGarvey, chief content office and executive vice-president of Paramount, Wilkinson’s ultimate employer.

That letter was written on the day of McCallum’s judgment. It says: “Neither Ms Wilkinson nor the Network Ten senior legal counsel present at the conference with the DPP on 15 June, 2022 understood that they had been cautioned that Ms Wilkinson giving an acceptance speech at the Logie awards could result in an application being made to the court to vacate the trial date. Had they understood that a specific warning had been given, Ms Wilkinson would not have given the speech.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865873

File: e3f673563fa6390⋯.jpg (101.44 KB,768x1024,3:4,Brittany_Higgins_outside_c….jpg)

File: e4610e31b0f039a⋯.jpg (100.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Attorney_General_Shane….jpg)

>>18865869

2/2

These are just some of the problems that have emerged in the DPP’s professional relationships with others in the criminal justice system.

They have presented Shane Rattenbury, the territory’s Attorney-General, with a diabolical problem.

The AG has political responsibility for the fairness and effectiveness of the criminal justice system. So when does that duty require him to act?

To some, it might seem fair to allow Drumgold to remain in office until Sofranoff weighs the accusations against him, and assesses his explanations.

Sacking Drumgold now, without waiting for Sofronoff’s report, would leave Rattenbury exposed to criticism for failing to act fairly – which is exactly the same failure that ran through the Lehrmann prosecution.

But how fair would it be to victims of crime and those accused of crime to leave Drumgold in place? That would also expose the Attorney-General to criticism.

Drumgold’s own testimony shows he accepts that he made errors during the Lehrmann prosecution, misled the court and did not consider matters that should have been considered.

Something had to be done. And it could be that Rattenbury is more subtle than some might credit.

Last Friday, Rattenbury declined an invitation to express confidence in Drumgold. This could have put the DPP on notice that it was time to fall on his sword.

Four weeks leave is not a solution. But it will provide a breathing space for Rattenbury and will give Drumgold time to reflect and consider his position.

He will have plenty of time to ponder what sort of report he is likely to face when Sofranoff completes this inquiry.

To that end, he might wish to refer to Sofranoff’s remarks in April, 2017, when he was welcomed to the bench as a judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland and president of the Court of Appeal.

Sofranoff referred to the principles that attracted his father and other refugees from Russia’s Bolshevik revolution to this country.

He referred to the fact that the legislature, the courts and the executive consisted of people acting instinctively in accordance with the rule of law.

This is what many refugees strive for “and that’s what I strive for”.

“We believe in rules that are rational and knowable, in rules that apply to everyone equally.

“In short we believe in fair play. And we believe in repelling any kind of corruption or distortion of our institutions that would pervert the conduct of the people who constitute those institutions …

“We in this country are so deeply committed to these beliefs that any tampering with the integrity of the foundations of our civil society by anyone, in any way, draws immediate outrage from within the institutions and from the people themselves,” Sofranoff said.

Chris Merritt is vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/thanks-for-the-break-shane-drumgold-now-please-dont-come-back/news-story/8da5588161d2cb1d00dead098877ccd0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865928

File: 5012395bcbb058d⋯.mp4 (15.55 MB,640x360,16:9,China_would_welcome_visit_….mp4)

File: 20521e1c90afbdb⋯.jpg (96.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chinese_ambassador_Xiao_Qi….jpg)

File: e706da7cf5e8840⋯.jpg (220.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ambassador_Xiao_Qian_addre….jpg)

Anthony Albanese visit to China on the table after Aussie timber ban lifted

BEN PACKHAM and MATTHEW DENHOLM - MAY 18, 2023

Beijing’s top diplomat in Australia has revealed that talks are under way for Anthony Albanese to visit China “as quickly as possible”, amid improving trade relations between the countries after the lifting of punitive trade bans on $600m-a-year worth of Australian timber.

China’s ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said there was “good momentum” in stabilising bilateral ties, and Chinese officials were working with their Australian counterparts to find “a time of mutual convenience” for the Prime Minister’s trip.

There has been growing speculation that Mr Albanese will visit Beijing in late October or early November to coincide with Gough Whitlam’s historic first visit to that country 50 years ago.

Despite having face-to-face talks with Xi Jinping on the sidelines of last year’s G20 summit in Bali, Mr Albanese has denied receiving an official invitation.

It’s understood he is reluctant to make the trip until trade issues between the countries are resolved and detained Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun are released.

The Australian Forest Products Association welcomed the end to the log ban, which was imposed in late 2020 after “forest pests” were allegedly detected by Chinese authorities in Australian timber shipments.

“China has been and will continue to be an important market for Australian timber and wood fibre export products,” chief executive Joel Fitzgibbon said.

“When the ban came into effect more than two years ago, it caused a great deal of upheaval and uncertainty for many timber exporters and the broader forest sector and this resolution is ­welcomed.”

Timber companies said, however, that they had already found different markets, and strong domestic demand meant there was a shortage of export logs.

“It opens up an opportunity to take it to another market, but there is not a massive volume,” Pentarch Forestry chief executive Paul Heubner said.

The end to the timber ban followed Trade Minister Don Farrell’s talks in Beijing last week with Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao aimed at resolving China’s $20bn worth of sanctions on Australian exports.

Mr Xiao said the trade issues were being dealt with “one by one”, and he hoped all could be resolved “as soon as possible”.

He said the two countries needed each other, and urged Australia to set up a joint working group to discuss China’s application to join the trans-Pacific trade agreement.

“In that working group, we can start talking about the standards, the differences, the common ground, where we can make some adjustments,” he said.

The 11-member Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership imposes the highest standards of all global free-trade deals.

It requires high levels of transparency and intellectual property protection, and precludes giving state-owned enterprises advan­tages over private companies.

ANU associate professor Shiro Armstrong said the Chinese system would require significant reform to create a level playing field that did not favour its huge number of government-owned companies, and it was in Australia’s interests, and those of other CPTPP members, to set out the reforms China needed to make to help bring more transparency to the global economy.

Mr Wentao last week acknowledged concerns over China’s bid to join the CPTPP, and Australia and Japan remain sceptical about the application, given Beijing’s long history of market manipulation and economic coercion.

In a wide-ranging press conference, Mr Xiao expressed “my personal sympathy” for Ms Cheng, who is detained in China for alleged espionage offences, saying he was trying “to do my utmost” to let friends and family see her.

He was silent on Yang Hengjun, who is also accused of spying.

Mr Xiao also thanked Australian authorities for their efforts to search for survivors from a capsized Chinese fishing vessel in the Indian Ocean, and urged “more aircraft, more ships” be sent.

He said China was “not a threat” to Australia, and the government’s planned re-arming was “absolutely unnecessary”.

Mr Xiao said Australia’s pursuit of nuclear-powered submarines was “pretty risky” because it would set a “bad example” to other countries on the sharing of wea­pons’ grade nuclear material.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/china-lifts-bans-on-16bn-of-aussie-timber-says-ambassador-xiao-qian/news-story/cf50bc8649fef81c97b47ec5876aba88

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865944

File: a998cfa282925af⋯.jpg (2.27 MB,4946x3297,4946:3297,China_s_Ambassador_to_Aust….jpg)

File: 06307151e6a8e84⋯.jpg (1.74 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Anthony_Albanese_is_the_fi….jpg)

>>18865928

>>18860427

>>18670474

‘China is not a threat': Ambassador Xiao Qian attacks Quad and AUKUS alliances as not in best interest of 'peace' in region

China has ramped up its criticism of Australia’s alliances and labelled the Quad a “rich man's club” that should stop its attack on China.

Ewa Staszewska - May 18, 2023

The Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian has declared that Beijing is “not a threat to Australia” as he condemned both the Quad and AUKUS alliances in the region.

The first meeting of the Quad leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US to be held in Sydney was scrapped on Wednesday after President Joe Biden was forced to cancel his trip.

Mr Xiao has labelled the alliance a “bad idea” and urged for the nations to “look at China objectively”.

“Personally I don’t think the Quad is a good idea. It’s an even worse idea when it’s trying to target China,” he told reporters in Canberra on Thursday.

He added that “China is ready to co-exist with Americans and the Pacific” in a “cooperative” and "non-confrontational manner".

Mr Xiao labelled the Quad a “rich man’s club” that did not represent the international community or the interests of anyone outside the seven countries.

The criticism was then extended to the AUKUS alliance, and he labelled the eye-watering cost of the submarine deal as “absolutely unnecessary”.

“China was not a threat, is not a threat, will not be a threat in the future to Australia,” Mr Xiao said.

“Targeting China as a threat is absolutely unfounded and absolutely unnecessary.

“AUKUS is not a good idea, nuclear submarines an even worse one.”

He warned that the AUKUS transmission of nuclear grade uranium to Australia set a bad example for other countries to follow suit.

“Very detrimental to peace and stability in the region,” Mr Xiao said.

Australia announced it would receive eight nuclear-powered submarines in a historic AUKUS security deal that will cost taxpayers somewhere between $268 billion and $368 billion.

Mr Xiao said the investment was an “unnecessary consumption” of hardworking Australians' taxpayer money.

Instead he argued that the money could be better spent to fund “infrastructure, reduce the cost of living and give the Australian people a better future.”

The Chinese Ambassador used the conference to reiterate “good relations with Australia” and said “mutual respect” was key to it being improved.

He confirmed that Beijing "welcomed" a meeting between President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese soon.

He highlighted the "good bilateral discussions" between the two leaders in both Bali and Thailand last year.

https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/china/china-is-not-a-threat-ambassador-xiao-qian-attacks-quad-and-aukus-alliances-as-not-in-best-interest-of-peace-in-region/news-story/f23863ab17580ddfe963427076f4ae75

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865983

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18687407

>>18760774

>>18794944

‘Kids love drag’: Drag queen icon Shane Zenek on storytime scandal

Famous Aussie drag queen Courtney Act went on The Project to defend drag queen storytime saying children loved people dressed in drag.

news.com.au - May 18, 2023

After weeks of drag queen storytime events being cancelled over abuse and threats one of Australia’s most famous drag queens has issued an emotional tribute to those under attack.

Shane Jenek, better known under the stage name Courtney Act toldThe Project that he recognised it was a difficult time for the “queer community when we are being discussed like this”.

“But to love someone of the same gender or express your gender differently means you have to step outside the status quo and understand something of yourself,” he said.

“That is such a strength.

“Queer people are hear to save the world, to show we can think differently about the old decaying systems and we can make them better and celebrate that diversity.”

Jenek said that drag queen storytime started with altruistic motives.

“It was for rainbow families so they could take their kids somewhere to spark the joy of reading and learning and imagination,” he said.

“To have these extremist groups, a small number of people, make threats of violence against libraries and councils is a really disappointing thing.”

Drag queen storytime events have been cancelled throughout the country over the past few weeks due to abuse and threats from those who oppose them, including, but not limited to, far-right and fringe conspiracy groups.

Jenek urged those in the queer community to contextualise the attacks citing his own experience on Play School.

“Overwhelmingly everybody was resoundingly lovely but it was like one person in real life … one person in the senate estimates … like two people on Twitter had something to say about it,” he said, before calling on the federal government to introduce anti vilification laws and show “some leadership”.

Victorian parliament hosts drag story time

Earlier this week, the Victorian government quietly invited five performers caught up in the cancellations to speak at “the safest place in Victoria, the parliament itself” for a drag queen story time.

The event held on the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia (IDAHOBIT), with Equality Minister Harriet Shing saying it was “small hateful minority” that had targeted drag events at local councils in recent weeks, and those who have campaigned against trans rights.

“We will never, ever let a small, hate-filled rabble take away from our joy, our pride, our dignity and our wellbeing,” she said.

The event at parliament took place on the same day as a drag story event was planned at Eltham Library, hosted by Nillumbik council in the city’s outer north.

The event was, like others in Monash and Casey before it, cancelled on Monday and shifted to an online event.

Drag performer Frock Hudson was the slated guest reader for the Eltham event, and was one of a number of drag performers invited to read at parliament instead.

She told The Project she had been “harassed online, like you wouldn’t believe, with multiple tweets, multiple private messages, multiple emails, I’ve actually just stopped looking at it if I’m really honest, it has been really horrible”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18865985

File: a342916e3f64554⋯.jpg (94.39 KB,768x1024,3:4,Shane_Jenek_better_known_a….jpg)

File: fbc438f8a4ea1da⋯.jpg (71.27 KB,768x1024,3:4,Courtney_Act_defends_drag_….jpg)

File: 61817f61c30d549⋯.jpg (243.36 KB,1280x720,16:9,Drag_Queen_Sam_T_reads_a_s….jpg)

File: 4fa5b0d1a1935fd⋯.jpg (202.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,Drag_Queens_story_time_rea….jpg)

>>18865983

2/2

Shocking footage

In April shocking footage captured the moment a Melbourne council meeting erupted into chaos over a drag queen story-time event.

Hundreds of protesters flooded a City of Monash council meeting ahead of discussions over a children’s story time event scheduled to be hosted at a local library next month.

Police officers were used to control the clashing protesters after members of the anti-drag camp started yelling abuse at the pro-drag and LGBTQIA+ community supporters.

Monash resident Gregory Storer said he felt safe until protesters from the anti-drag camp started yelling and banging on a glass wall.

“The vile language and rhetoric being used was offensive and quite intimidating,” he said.

Mr Storer moved from the gallery to stand between police officers in the hope he would be more safe.

When he returned to his seat after asking the council about their safe children policy he claimed he was met with more verbal abuse from the crowd.

“I heard people calling me a ‘f*ggot’, ’groomer’ and ‘pedo’,” he said.

His husband Michael Barnett filmed the meeting and captured some of the wild scenes as protesters screamed across the room.

“It was tense from the outset,” he said.

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/current-affairs/kids-love-drag-drag-queen-icon-shane-zenek-on-storytime-scandal/news-story/506624e554460c14f72b686249d95e57

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paQ1CPkpM3U

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18871739

File: 4e4810ce7f55329⋯.jpg (74.75 KB,1280x960,4:3,El_Chaston.jpg)

File: 3c301195726a652⋯.jpg (48.56 KB,650x1000,13:20,El_Chaston_2.jpg)

File: 24b9a5ae2dda97c⋯.jpg (124.67 KB,1280x721,1280:721,El_Chaston_then_known_as_E….jpg)

Former AFLW player El Chaston opens up on life-changing breast removal surgery to find their true self

LAUREN WOOD - MAY 19, 2023

1/4

El Chaston doesn’t want to shock you. They want to educate you. About why they identify as non-binary and what for them was an easy decision to have a double mastectomy to fully embrace who they are. They share their incredible story with Lauren Wood.

El Chaston is at peace. With life. With their gender identity. And after years of internal struggle, their body.

It’s taken 21 years to get here. But just weeks before their 21st birthday, Chaston became their truest self, undergoing a removal of their breast tissue – essentially a double mastectomy, or “top surgery” – to reflect their non-binary identity.

After years of pain – physical and mental – it “all just washed away”.

“Growing up, I never felt comfortable with my chest,” Chaston said. “I always felt like it was something I wasn’t super associated with.

“Growing up, it was very much that you were a girl or a boy. But for me, I did not align with my assigned gender (of female).

“I just had to live with it, even though I was super uncomfortable.

“I really hated getting changed in front of the mirror and stuff. I just didn’t feel comfortable looking at my chest or associating with my chest. At all.

“I was uncomfortable in the clothes I was wearing and every day it was a battle to try and find comfort in my own body.”

The Melbourne local always battled to find their place – where they “fit”.

“I couldn’t put a name to what I felt that I was,” they said.

It wasn’t until the likes of former Gold Coast AFL Women’s player Tori Groves-Little – more on them later – and Carlton goalkicker Darcy Vescio revealed they identified as non-binary that Chaston felt the light bulb start to flicker.

Earlier this month Hawthorn captain Tilly Lucas-Rodd also revealed they now identified as non-binary.

THE AFLW EFFECT

A non-binary person is someone who does not identify exclusively as male or female, or determines their gender identity cannot be defined within such margins. They might feel as if they are a mix of the genders – or maybe neither.

Pronouns such as they/them can be adopted over those such as she/her or he/him, which Chaston – then a Collingwood AFLW player – elected to do last August after much soul-searching and support from their team-mates.

“It goes to the importance of representation of diversity in sport,” they said.

“It was actually TGL (Tori Groves-Little) putting themselves out there and giving more representation, that educated and exposed me to gender identity and diversity.

“At that time, I still wasn’t sure if that’s how I completely aligned. Then there was Darcy Vescio and this conversation was starting.

“I hadn’t talked to anyone at that stage but in my head I was like, ‘I actually think this fits me. I fit, all of a sudden.’

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18871747

File: b064dd9a3f96db1⋯.jpg (130.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chaston_sporting_Collingwo….jpg)

File: 82f6dfe63eaaf18⋯.jpg (118.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,El_Chaston_with_their_pare….jpg)

File: 9a76c836ba6c87b⋯.jpg (54.01 KB,650x1000,13:20,El_Chaston_3.jpg)

>>18871739

2/4

‘I JUST COMPLETELY BROKE DOWN’

Chaston – a believer that there are “no insignificant moments in life” – travelled to Sydney ahead of the last AFLW season last August, and found themselves grounded in a gate lounge after three consecutive flight delays. There was time to think. And to take the next step.

A WhatsApp message to the playing group was formulated, drafted and edited. They consulted with ex-team-mate and best friend Chloe Molloy – who Chaston credits with being a vital part of their journey – and then it was sent.

“I’m still trying to work out who I really am,” the message read in part, indicating a preference to trial gender-neutral pronouns within the club.

“I’m not 100 per cent sure on this but I’d really like to try in a space where I feel comfortable and safe and, for me, that’s the footy club.”

The phone was immediately switched to airplane mode and turned over on the floor. Chaston’s reaction was visceral.

“I just completely broke down,” they recalled. “The weight was lifted.”

The enormous support that followed was just as overwhelming.

“It was just incredible … (my team-mates said) ‘We want to do this for you. We want to help you feel like the best version of you,’” Chaston said.

“To this day, out of all my sporting achievements – getting drafted, playing a debut game, captain of my NAB League (Under 18s) side, back to basketball days, nothing beats that sporting memory of having a team come to me and being like, ‘We’ve got you.’

“I think that speaks volumes of AFLW.”

TELLING THE FAMILY

Then there was telling their family – parents Paul and Trish, and three brothers.

“I wanted to make sure that by Pride Round (of last AFLW season) I was really open and proud with my identity,” they said. “I’d become very affirmed and confident that this is the best way for me to identify. I felt like it really affirmed the way I felt about myself.

“I started the conversations with my parents and my family, saying that being like this is the best way for me to feel like the truest version of El.

“Nothing actually changes about me. It’s just the way that you refer to me is slightly different.

“My parents processed what I had just explained and took further time to get further education around gender identity. For them, they hadn’t really known anyone else that had identified like that.

“It is now a really natural thing around my family.”

THE QUESTION — WHY?

If “Why?” is the first question normally put to Chaston, the second is generally along the lines of, “Does this mean you’re transitioning (to male)?”

That’s not the case, they affirmed.

Chaston – who was also an elite junior basketballer – had been binding their chest for two years leading up to their non-binary revelation, for almost every minute of the day, except when playing football, in a bid to give the appearance of a flat chest.

Binders – high compression garments that aim to flatten the appearance of breasts – were hard to come by and expensive, prompting Chaston to explore Facebook Marketplace for second-hand options.

“Prior to that, I would wear two sports bras – all the time,” they said.

“Whether I was at sport, home, school, sleeping, everything. It was always very compressed on my chest.

“I was already doing major damage. Then I went to binding. When people ask me about binders, I say they’re great for affirming the way you want to feel about your body, but they’re terrible for your chest. And you’ve got to have really good binding practices, which I had none of.”

Medical professionals advise binders be removed at night, and warn that wearing binders that are too tight can cause underlying damage.

“It was a case of, if I don’t wear the binder, yes my chest doesn’t hurt as much, but mentally I really struggle because I feel uncomfortable, I don’t like the way shirts sit on me, I don’t like looking at myself in the mirror. I’m not seeing a reflection of how I view myself,” Chaston said.

“Then I’d put the binder on – alleviate all the mental side, but have to deal with really sore ribs, back, chest hurting, can’t really breathe – all those types of things.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18871753

File: 24ab70b254c2a36⋯.jpg (78.87 KB,1280x720,16:9,It_s_taken_courage.jpg)

File: 6f2bba72dc228ab⋯.jpg (592.84 KB,1112x817,1112:817,_torilittle_.jpg)

File: fb9bc1ad3b65686⋯.jpg (68.34 KB,1280x720,16:9,El_Chaston_pictured_gettin….jpg)

>>18871747

3/4

Baggy shirts and binders couldn’t be worn on the football field. “A footy jersey – they’re not very forgiving on the best of days,” Chaston laughs.

“I remember my first season, photo day. I wore my two sports bras as tight as I could. I remember getting the photos back and I was like, ‘Oh, great photos but … you can tell I’ve got boobs.’

“It didn’t really sit well with me. The next year, I wore a binder. When we got them back … I was like, ‘That’s how I want to look all the time.’ That is the most affirming photo of me.

“All of a sudden I was like, for my mental health and physical health, I can’t keep binding.”

Chaston believes there are no insignificant moments.

THE LIFECHANGING MOMENT

A chance sighting of Tori Groves-Little’s Instagram story indicating they were preparing for top surgery, a chest masculinisation procedure, was a moment Chaston won’t forget.

They reached out and asked for surgeon details and more information about the process.

Chaston “had no idea” what it would entail but was determined that this was their path, seeking referrals from a GP to two Melbourne surgeons and one in Brisbane.

The two Melbourne options had a long wait time for both consultation and surgery – hampering Chaston’s AFLW season plans – while Brisbane specialist Dr Alys Saylor had a consultation opening in November and surgery windows in January. It was on.

The then-20 year old jetted north with Molloy and then-fellow Pie, Jordyn Allen, the trio still filling out forms as they rushed to make their flight home in time for the Magpies’ best and fairest awards that night.

Surgery was scheduled for January 4, a day after Groves-Little’s scheduled procedure. “I didn’t have an ounce of nerves – I didn’t second guess it,” Chaston said.

Paul and Trish travelled alongside their child, who “couldn’t ask for more supportive parents”.

The moment Chaston’s bandages were removed will stay with them forever.

They had looked down when they woke from surgery – struck by the curves that still remained, only to be told that was in fact their pectoral muscles which had until then been obscured.

They rushed to the bathroom.

“I didn’t even need to pee – I just wanted to look in the mirror,” they said.

“I looked and I was like, ‘This is perfect’. And that was still with a big bandage.

“Having the bandage off was one of the most euphoric moments I have ever experienced. Just being able to look down and see that I had a flat chest. To look down and only see torso. Everyone watches the video of it and notices my smile in that moment.

“This is how I’ve always wanted to look. This is how I’ve always been meant to be.”

Their original nipples have been regrafted, though some who undergo surgery choose to have their nipples removed entirely.

Recovery wasn’t easy.

“Once the drains come out and you start getting a bit more movement, it’s actually harder because you shouldn’t be doing a lot of movement,” Chaston said.

“It’s restricting yourself. You don’t realise how much you use your chest.

“Mum and dad would put my phone next to my shoulder, because I couldn’t actually reach it, so they’d put it just out of my reach just so they could laugh at me trying to get it.”

The scars remain, and receive ongoing care. A reminder, Chaston says, of how far they have come.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18871760

File: f0add63ae1e0f9f⋯.jpg (90.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,El_Chaston_at_their_21st_b….jpg)

File: 1d44145ceed3fd3⋯.jpg (84.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,_I_m_just_human_Chaston_sa….jpg)

>>18871753

4/4

CELEBRATING EL

Their new self was celebrated at their 21st birthday in February – also referred to as their “first birthday” – marked with emotion from mum. “I put her on the spot to make a speech,” Chaston said.

“She didn’t really know what to say.

“She said, ‘I thought I knew my child. I thought I knew my child was happy.

“But after El had surgery, I finally realised that this is how El is meant to be, because they are so happy.”

Chaston said, “And you don’t know someone’s not happy until you see them at their best. All of a sudden, you realise that, yeah, they were happy, but they were still struggling heaps.

“That was the best way to encapsulate it. All of a sudden I felt that this was the most true version of me. At the end of the day it doesn’t impact anyone else. No one else has to live in my body and look in the mirror and see how I view myself.

“That was like the best thing ever.”

They have since met a female partner, more open to a relationship now they are “content and happy with my body”, and returned to football with Essendon VFL Women’s team over recent weeks.

Delisted by Collingwood AFLW in mid-February, the dream of returning to AFL Women’s still burns.

THE MEANING BEHIND THE TATTOO

Swimming shirtless for the first time marked “a core memory” for Chaston they will hold dear, and deep conversations at music festivals and events have been sparked by their visible scars.

The addition of a striking tattoo on their chest was a vital step.

“After surgery, one of the first things I wanted to get was the HUMAN tattoo done,” they said. “I have two I see as meaningful to me coming out – the little angel on my bicep, which is an ode to my younger self and all that the younger El went through so that I could be the person that I am now. A bit of a caterpillar into a butterfly type thing.

“After surgery I got HUMAN tattooed as a bit of a statement piece that although I’ve got these two pretty big scars, at the end of the day we’re all human.

“If people get confused or concerned or they’ve got questions about how I identify or why I had surgery, it’s the first thing I go back to. I’m just a human. I’m just El.

“But I am human. That’s the most important thing.”

Lauren Wood is an AFL and AFL Women's reporter for the Herald Sun and CODE Sports. She also covers a range of other sports across the busy Melbourne sporting calendar.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/former-aflw-player-el-chaston-opens-up-on-lifechanging-breast-removal-surgery-to-find-their-true-self/news-story/597e0adc7e23c033d987e7d108daa2f8

https://archive.vn/sq0Qv

https://twitter.com/LaurenHeraldSun/status/1659381054913019904

https://www.instagram.com/p/CnROE6ovkgx/

https://www.valleyplasticsurgery.com.au/dr-alys-saylor/

>Think logically.

>Ask yourself - is this normal?

>Conspiracy?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0a15bf No.18873902

Australian Doctor News

(No source. Passed to me by a doctor via email marked FYI)

Should doctors be banned from surgically ‘correcting’ intersex traits in children?

The ACT could be the first jurisdiction to enforce legal controls.

 By Sarah Simpkins

Clitorectomies, phalloplasty and gonadectomies on intersex children will be illegal without an urgent clinical justification, under draft ACT laws.

Chief Minister Andrew Barr says doctors have performed inappropriate interventions, and the legislation — the first in Australia — is necessary to protect children from harm.

It would ban significant deferrable surgeries affecting a child’s sex characteristics until the intersex child had capacity to consent, with potential penalties of up to $22,000 in fines or two years’ imprisonment.

Medical ethics expert Dr Wendy Bonython (PhD) says that “historically”, babies born with intersex characteristics have been treated “almost immediately”.

“The response from doctors would be: ‘We need to give them some form of gender identifiable physical characteristics.’

“Labiaplasties and a whole lot of cosmetic procedures were performed, not so much to address function, but just to give the child recognisable and gender-identifiable external genitalia.

“But many of these children later reported they felt they were ‘in the wrong body’ or were assigned the wrong gender, or really wished they had the opportunity to participate in that decision-making process.”

The definition of intersex varies, complicating the issue.

Fundamentally, intersex include children born with genitals, gonads or chromosome patterns that do not completely fit male or female phenotypes.

But prevalence estimates depend on the definition — whether it is children with any ‘noticeably atypical’ genitalia (around 2%), or only those where a specialist doctor is required for sex differentiation (around 0.02%).

Dr Bonython, an Associate Professor of Law at Bond University on the Gold Coast, stresses that doctors have not intervened due to “malevolence” or “wanting to harm children”.

“It was basically a case of: ‘How can we make this child’s life easier?’

“Back in the ’50s and ’60s, this was done without even consulting the parents.

“The assumption was it was too distressing for the parents, and doctors would go for either the easiest surgical option or the one they thought was most likely to be ‘correct’.”

The first draft of the ACT law will permit surgery in health emergencies, or if the procedure is easily reversible or does not affect the child’s sex characteristics.

Other procedures will require approval of the treatment plan from an assessment board, which will include members trained in medicine and ethics, and at least one intersex person.

Significantly, a risk of psychological harm from stigma or discrimination will not be counted as a legitimate medical reason to intervene, under the draft bill.

“For example, surgery on a child with chronic UTIs that had a structural basis, which need correcting, would not be banned,” Dr Bonython says.

“The bill wouldn’t leave the child to suffer from the chronic condition until they reached 18.

“It essentially says: ‘Anything that’s not medically necessary in the short term should absolutely be delayed until the child is old enough to actively participate in the decision-making.

“But the review committee will be required to discount considerations about discrimination and stigma.

“That said, if these are not legitimate reasons for providing that type of treatment, what are the other things the government is doing to offset the risk of stigma and discrimination against these kids?”

Mr Barr has said his government will invest $2.6 million over four years to support services for intersex people, including extra training for health professionals.

The ACT bill remains before Parliament, although with no Senate to negotiate, the government bill is expected to become law later this year.

And Dr Bonython expects that, if it becomes law, other jurisdictions will follow.

What about circumcision?

Circumcision will not be affected by the ACT bill. As the government explains:

“Circumcision of the penis is excluded for several reasons.

“This bill applies only to people who have a variation in sex characteristics.

“If circumcision of the penis were not exempted, this would mean people without a variation in sex characteristics could be circumcised, while those with a variation could not, despite there not necessarily being an underlying difference in the health circumstances between those two groups.

“[Also] there is a religious element to why some people seek to circumcise their children.

“Prohibiting circumcision would involve a different consideration of freedom of religious practices.”

WONDER WHAT THIS MANS FOR TOP AND BOTTOM SURGERY.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18874922

File: 03716c938516da5⋯.jpg (173.46 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Noel_Pearson_right_has_rub….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18865753

‘Bedwetter’: Noel Pearson rubbishes Mick Gooda’s voice suggestion

NOAH YIM - MAY 19, 2023

Cape York Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has rubbished renewed calls to remove from the voice to parliament proposal the power to advise executive government.

It comes after long-time public servant and former human rights commissioner Mick Gooda – a Gangulu person – on Thursday expressed concerns the voice proposal would fail and suggested removing the executive government from the proposal.

“Mick Gooda’s wrong,” Mr Pearson told ABC’s RN on Friday morning. “He’s never been involved in the process that led to the Uluru Statement from the Heart. He had no involvement. He was running the Don Dale Inquiry in the Northern Territory that so far, as I can gather today, has produced nothing.”

Mr Pearson said Mr Gooda’s intervention yesterday was akin to “wetting the bed”.

“He was opposed to the voice. He only wanted symbolic recognition. So he has form in relation to the position that he’s taken. But, you know, this early bed-wetting just when we’re yet to start the campaign proper is not right. He does not represent Indigenous people in the position he’s taken.”

Mr Pearson also denied that support for the voice to parliament was falling.

“There’s no trend,” he said. “There’s one outlier poll and we’ll have to see how we go. As I said, we’ve been through a lot of strife. The media has been probably nine-to-one against us in this, in these recent months.”

Nonetheless, he said the campaign was under “heavy weather”.

“We’re not yet on the journey. The campaign proper is yet to start. When this legislation passes the parliament, we’ll be ready to start the long paddle upriver.”

He also said former opposition Indigenous affairs spokesperson Julian Leeser was “damaging the cause of recognition”.

“Julian, as a friend of recognition, he said he‘d vote for recognition in any case,” Mr Pearson said. “He thinks that he’s doing a helpful thing in terms of proposing a last-minute change, knowing that the time has been called on those changes now. And I think that Julian’s agenda here is actually damaging to the cause of recognition.”

Mr Leeser left the Opposition frontbench last month over its position on the voice to parliament, but pushed for a model that would remove the executive government from the proposal.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bedwetter-noel-pearson-rubbishes-mick-goodas-voice-suggestion/news-story/8caf00cb5ddac8302207b5b91740e114

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18874989

File: acece0cff824256⋯.mp4 (15.78 MB,640x360,16:9,Support_for_Voice_drops_in….mp4)

>>18676743

>>18865753

Liberals marshall No campaign on Voice wording as Yes side dispute erupts

Paul Sakkal - May 19, 2023

1/2

A bitter dispute has broken out in the Yes camp over the wording of the Voice to parliament referendum as the Liberal Party takes a leap in its effort to convince Australians to reject the constitutional change.

Voice architect Noel Pearson on Friday launched a personal attack on Indigenous leader Mick Gooda, who had spoken of his fears the referendum would fail, labelling him a “bed-wetter” who had done little for Indigenous people.

Gooda, a former social justice commissioner and royal commission leader, fought back by warning Pearson his bullying undermined the referendum, echoing the private concerns of some Voice advocates who worry Pearson’s regular invective is unhelpful.

The dispute erupted as a newly formalised “Liberals for No” group – run by senators Kerryne Liddle (South Australia), Jono Duniam (Tasmania), and Paul Scarr (Queensland) – launched a co-ordinated drive against the Voice.

The body, according Duniam and Scarr, will launch social media pages, seek donations, release advertising, provide MPs with campaign material and work with the party’s organisational wing to present an anti-Voice movement separate from the No groups led by Warren Mundine and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

The Liberal group’s leaders said they would highlight the potential risks of enshrining in the Constitution the ability for the Voice to lobby ministers and bureaucrats, known as the executive arm of government.

Debate over the wording sparked the standoff between Pearson and Gooda, who said on Thursday that keeping “executive government” out of the proposed constitutional amendment could make the Voice less risky for undecided Australians.

In a fiery interview on ABC’s Radio National on Friday morning, Pearson said Gooda was “extremely foolish” for suggesting a wording change after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had consulted Indigenous leaders on a draft.

“His early bed-wetting, just when we’re yet to start the campaign proper, is not right. He does not represent Indigenous people in the position he’s taken,” Pearson said, referring to the Indigenous leader as “little Micky Gooda”.

Gooda is leading the Queensland treaty process and ran the high-profile 2016 royal commission into the NT youth justice system. He was the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social justice commissioner of the Australian Human Rights Commission.

“Mick’s problem is that he thinks he can’t separate compromise from capitulation. He thinks capitulation is compromise,” Pearson said.

Asked by ABC host Patricia Karvelas if he was playing the man not the ball, Pearson said: “When the man’s holding the ball in the way he is, well, you’ve got to tackle him.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18874991

File: 3653fb73f7140bb⋯.jpg (92.61 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Noel_Pearson_insists_the_f….jpg)

>>18874989

2/2

Gooda responded to Pearson by calling for civility, saying: “We, the Yes side, have to win over people with logical, precise arguments that win the hearts and minds.

“I’ve disagreed with some things Noel has said and done in the past. But I know in my heart of hearts that he fights for what he thinks is best for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. I wish he would afford others the same courtesy when they disagree with him.

“But personal abuse is not the approach to take because I won’t be bullied into conforming with his position and the Australian public won’t be bullied into voting yes in this referendum.”

Pearson also criticised Liberal MP Julian Leeser, who will next week use parliament to try to change the constitutional wording. Leeser said he had been speaking with both Pearson and Gooda recently, and also wanted to give the referendum the best chance of success.

“I am arguing [to keep executive government out of the Constitution] so that it makes it easier for more voters to vote yes because we have removed the central argument of the no campaign,” Leeser said.

One of the leaders of the new Liberal referendum grouping, Coalition frontbencher Jonno Duniam, said the Voice would create a break from the liberal principle of equality before the law and argued Voice proponents could not explain the amendment’s practical benefit.

“From my point of view, as politicians, we’re in the business of solving problems and the whole thing at the base of this debate is making lives better for Australians in need of support,” he said. “What is it that we are doing this for?”

Key Voice proponent Megan Davis, commenting on Gooda’s recommendations, said research showed Australians wanted the Voice to be powerful.

“Otherwise, what’s the point? People want change, not the status quo,” she said on Twitter.

“Our mob are always expected to tolerate street fighting rules when it comes to us and politics,” she said of Pearson’s comments. “But when we push back, in a political contest, in comes the civility brigade.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/noel-pearson-attacks-fellow-indigenous-leader-over-voice-20230519-p5d9mi.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875023

File: b241fa47430f622⋯.jpg (114.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Liberal_MP_Aaron_Violi_say….jpg)

File: 0046b781d3afea4⋯.jpg (51.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Darkinjung_Aboriginal_Land….jpg)

File: 6332b0f1179424f⋯.jpg (77.83 KB,1280x720,16:9,NSW_senator_Andrew_Bragg.jpg)

>>18676743

Indigenous voice to parliament: Liberal MP Aaron Violi could be swayed by change in wording

SARAH ISON - MAY 19, 2023

Liberal MPs with concerns over the Indigenous voice to parliament would consider backing the Yes campaign if Labor removed “executive government” from the constitutional amendment due to be debated in parliament next week.

It follows Indigenous leader Noel Pearson claiming a change in the amendment – which could also include additional words being added to mitigate the perceived legal risk of the voice being empowered to advise executive government – would not change the hearts and minds of any new Liberals.

Mr Pearson said that the former legal affairs spokesman for the opposition, Julian Leeser, had admitted this much to him.

“He said no new people would come on-board if this change was made,” Mr Pearson told the ABC.

However, numerous backbenchers said that a revision of the wording would be significant and have an impact on their position.

Casey MP Aaron Violi said the legal challenges presented by the voice being allowed to advise executive government was one of his key sticking points.

“If the government made a meaningful attempt to modify the risk … it would alleviate one of the significant concerns I have with the proposal,” Mr Violi told The Australian.

Mr Violi said he had not finalised his position on the voice at this time and was still engaged in community consultation.

A senior Liberal, who asked to remain anonymous, said a compromise in wording would “force a reconsideration” of the position on the voice for many within the party.

It follows referendum working group member Sean Gordon raising concern this week over if the referendum would truly be “winnable” should the voice be allowed to advise executive government, arguing in The Australian that the uncertainty over resulting legal challenges would be an effective “tool” for the no campaign.

Victorian Liberal senator David Van said while he fully supported the position of the party room, he would look closely at any change in wording in the constitutional amendment.

“It would certainly give me cause to stop and look at it again,” he said.

“If they took out executive government … I think that's a step in the right direction.”

Mr Van said other concerns, such as how local and regional voices would work, would also need to be looked at before he would consider throwing his support behind the body.

Supporters of the voice within the party include Mr Leeser, Bridget Archer and Andrew Bragg – all of whom are free to vote however they choose on the constitutional amendment because they are on the backbench.

Senior Liberals have defended the decision for frontbenchers not to be given a free vote, with opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash telling The Australian this month that on an issue as important as constitutional change, it was critical the party had a “united position”.

Other Liberal branches, including Victoria and NSW, have given their members a free vote.

Menzies MP Keith Wolahan, who sat on the committee that examined the constitutional amendment, said there was “only upsides to amending the wording”.

“It is constitutionally responsible, but will also give comfort to a percentage of the public who want to vote Yes, but still have reservations,” he said.

“I would in good faith consider any amendment to the wording and, if it reduced risk, would publicly say so.”

However, Mr Wolahan said he would still be inclined to vote No at the referendum, because the constitutional amendment put at risk “equality of citizenship”.

Other Liberal members, including NSW senator Hollie Hughes, WA senator Matt O’Sullivan, Queensland MP Phillip Thompson and Tasmanian MP Gavin Pearce also said the removal of executive government would not address their key concerns over the constitutional amendment, which they said “divided people on the basis of race”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-liberal-mp-aaron-violi-could-be-swayed-by-change-in-wording/news-story/d4a29d46ede3dfe99ce2811e557e3729

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875053

File: 38fa153287d0849⋯.jpg (89.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_at_the_Na….jpg)

File: 0fea9171f887eab⋯.jpg (114.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_is_suing_th….jpg)

>>18766047

ABC to rely on ‘public interest’ defence in Bruce Lehrmann defamation case

ELLIE DUDLEY - MAY 19, 2023

The ABC will rely on a new public interest defence in its defamation battle against Bruce Lehrmann, arguing the broadcast of Brittany Higgins’ National Press Club address was of importance to Australians because it concerned the “safety of persons in Parliament House”.

The public broadcaster’s defence, released on Friday, also argued Mr Lehrmann had no grounds for defamation as he was not named during the broadcast.

Mr Lehrmann is suing the ABC after it televised the National Press Club event on February 9, 2022, and uploaded a YouTube video of it which received a joint 276,000 views.

His trial into the rape allegation by his former colleague and Liberal Party staffer Ms Higgins was abandoned in October. He has always maintained his innocence.

In his original statement of claim Mr Lehrmann argued the ABC broadcasts were defamatory because the imputation was that he “raped Brittany Higgins on a couch in Parliament House”.

However, the ABC claimed Mr Lehrmann was “not named in the matters complained of” and therefore his reputation could not have been damaged.

Further, the ABC argued if, as declared in Mr Lehrmann’s statement of claim, it was “notorious” he was the person accused and charged with Ms Higgins’ assault then “the matters complained of would not have caused, and were not likely to cause, serious harm to Lehrmann’s reputation.”

The ABC also outlined reasons for the broadcast being in the public’s interest, including that it concerned former prime minister Scott Morrison’s response to an allegation of rape in Parliament House.

The broadcaster also argued it concerned the forthcoming federal election and the “work of Ms Higgins as an advocate for survivors of sexual assault and her treatment by members of the public, the media and others.”

Further, it said the matter was in the public interest as it related to “the circumstances of child sexual abuse and the trauma caused by such abuse; the relationship between perpetrators of child sexual abuse and survivors of such abuse; and the Government’s response to the issue of abuse, the adequacy of funding for preventive education and the need for legislative change in respect of the perpetrators of abuse.”

The defence also referenced a text exchange between Ms Higgins and former deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce, after Mr Morrison learnt of the alleged sexual assault. In the messages, Mr Joyce described Mr Morrison as “a hypocrite and a liar”.

The defence comes as Mr Lehrmann gears up for a separate defamation case against Channel Ten and NewsLife Media, the publisher of News.com.au and owned by News Corp Australia.

The case concerns interviews with Ms Higgins published and broadcast in mid-February. While Mr Lehrmann was not named in the interviews, conducted by journalists Lisa Wilkinson and Samantha Maiden, his legal team argued he was identified indirectly.

Ten and NewsLife Media reject the accusation they identified Mr Lehrmann, but will seek to rely in part on a defence of truth.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/safety-of-persons-in-parliament-house-new-abc-defence-over-brittany-higgins-speech-broadcast/news-story/5500d374d36a3398c623afc9291210de

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875089

File: d6d1682eafbe07a⋯.jpg (181.08 KB,1536x864,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_centre_is_g….jpg)

File: bb60b8aa53d7b27⋯.jpg (72.05 KB,620x930,2:3,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>18708667

Punching up: Will Bruce Lehrmann’s prosecutor survive his latest fight?

The wiry Shane Drumgold, SC, has been throwing punches all his life. But now the ACT’s top prosecutor is on the ropes.

Angus Thompson and James Massola - MAY 19, 2023

1/2

Shane Drumgold, SC, has been throwing punches all his life.

Those he’s landed have won him gold medals for boxing at the national Masters Games, and the distinction of being the first Indigenous person to become a director of public prosecutions. Last week he threw some haymakers, against politicians, the media, and the police.

But now the ACT’s top prosecutor is on the ropes for his part in the abandoned Parliament House rape trial of former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann, which has been described in the inquiry as the most talked about case since Lindy Chamberlain.

“The natural thing is to move away,” Drumgold’s former boxing coach and long-time friend Garry Hamilton says about being punched. But boxers don’t back down. “I move into you when you punch.”

A tough childhood

Hamilton – a former union official and Olympic trainer – is describing the counter-intuitive mindset necessary for boxing. But he is also talking about Drumgold, a man who has always kept swinging.

Born in 1965, he began life on a public housing estate in the western Sydney suburb of Mount Druitt in a home where his father struggled with mental health issues and alcohol, while his mother endured years of domestic violence.

When he was 12, the family relocated to the NSW north-coast town of Taree, but tragedy followed: soon after the move, one of his younger twin brothers, aged three, died after contracting encephalitis from a swimming pool. Some years later, Drumgold’s father killed himself.

Drumgold would drop out of high school at 15, but ultimately studied law as a mature-aged student at the University of Canberra in 2000, before tutoring at the Australian National University, where his application to study was initially rejected.

Trial aborted

“We have similar sort of ideals in wanting to help people out, you know, do the right thing and, I mean, to be honest, if it’s right, we don’t care about what happens to us personally over it,” Hamilton says.

Drumgold has proudly wielded his backstory, but his future remains unclear, tied up a gripping post-mortem of the Lehrmann case.

Brittany Higgins accused Lehrmann of raping her in the parliamentary office of their then-boss, former Coalition minister Linda Reynolds, after a night drinking with workmates in May 2019.

The trial, held in 2022 after several delays, was aborted in October, several days into jury deliberations after one juror brought their own research into the jury room. Drumgold announced he would forgo a retrial in December due to Higgins’ mental health. Lehrmann has always denied the allegations and insisted on his innocence, launching two separate defamation cases in the wake of the mistrial.

By the end of the year, the ACT government had begun its own inquiry into the case amid a public fallout between Drumgold and police.

Prosecutor as witness

Drumgold was ready for a fight from the witness box of the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal, alleging that, from the get-go, he faced a tide of opposition from investigators, who he said harboured “biased, stereotype opinion” over how an alleged victim should behave.

Following a week of forensic questioning – a job usually reserved for him – the prosecutor appeared out of puff after volleys of accusations and admissions about his and others’ conduct, including a stunning walk back over suspicions of political meddling.

Hamilton, who also studied law with Drumgold, says the man he’s known for 20 years was never the kind of person to look the other way. “If he feels as though something needs to be done, it has to be done … simple as that,” he says.

Drumgold rocked the Board of Inquiry last week when he said a series of “strange events” led him to believe there was federal interference in the politically charged case, so he wrote to ACT Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan of his suspicions on November 1.

“One of the questions I’m raising is: is there a connection between federal interference with ACT policing? That’s the primary concern that I have,” Drumgold responded to a question from inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff, KC.

This prompted vehement public denials and rebukes from Reynolds and her Liberal colleague Michaelia Cash, both witnesses in the trial.

“This suggestion is baseless and without any foundation,” Reynolds said last week.

A day later, back on the stand, Drumgold recanted, saying he actually thought police resistance to charging Lehrmann was due to “most likely a skills deficit on the part of investigators”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875094

File: c5cd039c19a2eb1⋯.jpg (149.01 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Shane_Drumgold_has_been_ac….jpg)

File: 87efc62aa284697⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,3171x2114,3:2,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_maintai….jpg)

>>18875089

2/2

A brilliant career

By any measure, Drumgold’s career until now has been a triumph, prosecuting high-profile cases such as the conviction of Marcus Rappel for the brutal axe murder of Canberra mother Tara Costigan.

For that, Costigan’s family have been in his corner since. “He’s probably one of the most gracious, honest men that we know,” Maria Costigan, Tara Costigan’s aunt said this week.

“He was always composed, he listened, and he acknowledged us. Obviously, there were times that we were jumping out of our brains with what was going on. Somehow or other, he would still listen to us and bring us back down.

“We’ll always be grateful for his efforts.”

Drumgold also made news in 2019 when he dropped a case against Neil O’Riordan, who assisted his terminally ill wife to die.

Mistakes made

But in his time on the stand as he reflected on the Lehrmann rape trial, his highest profile case yet, he conceded there were many things he could have done differently.

As well as admitting he should have qualified his defunct suspicions of political interference to a nationally publicised inquiry, he fought back tears as he admitted he “probably” should not have made such a spirited defence of Brittany Higgins when he called a press conference to announce there would be no retrial of Bruce Lehrmann.

“I foolishly thought [the media] might give her a break,” he said.

Asked whether he had turned his mind to the effect his statement would have on Lehrmann, who had pleaded not guilty to raping Higgins and has maintained his innocence, he said, “possibly not as much as I should have”.

He also conceded he may have broken the law when reading Higgins’ confidential counselling notes that he was trying to quarantine from the defence.

Drumgold has been accused of aligning himself with Higgins; of being hostile towards police; of withholding information from the defence team; and of misleading the court over an exchange with high-profile journalist Lisa Wilkinson before her Logies speech last June, which caused the trial to be delayed.

If there was a compelling finding in the inquiry that, for example, he had misled the court, it is difficult to see how the chief prosecutor could continue in his role. But he also is not the only party under scrutiny.

The probe is also examining whether the ACT division of the Australian Federal Police or the territory’s Victims of Crime Commissioner “failed to act in accordance with their duties or acted in breach of their duties in their conduct during the investigation of the case”.

There are days of testimony to come that could potentially put the heat onto ACT police and reshape perceptions of the case once more.

After Drumgold left the witness box last week, his lawyer Mark Tedeschi, KC, launched another jab on his client’s behalf, telling the inquiry he would set out to prove that police would not have charged Lehrmann had the allegation not centred on Parliament House.

“Had it not been for the publicity, had it not been an [alleged] offence that occurred in Parliament House, it would have been one of 250 matters that were just ignored by police,” Tedeschi said last Friday.

On Thursday, it was revealed that Drumgold had taken almost a month’s leave at his request. For the rest of the inquiry, the question of whether he returns to the top job will loom large.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/punching-up-will-bruce-lehrmann-s-prosecutor-survive-his-latest-fight-20230511-p5d7qh.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875135

File: b637d74f9b47cc3⋯.jpg (136.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_att….jpg)

File: 4e963b316fd6fcc⋯.jpg (122.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Quad_leaders_Anthony_Alban….jpg)

>>18860427

>>18744386

Joe Biden is skipping the Quad meeting over the US debt ceiling — but our underwhelming Defence Strategic Review will not have gone unnoticed, says Peter Jennings

PETER JENNINGS - MAY 18, 2023

1/2

US President Joe Biden’s decision not to attend a summit of the Quad countries in Sydney is disappointing but not unexpected. Given the perilous negotiations in Washington to avert a default on government debt, it is more surprising that Biden is still intending travel to the G7 meeting in Japan.

A budget spending default means government services shut down, and it has happened before. I have visited the Pentagon when only essential staff were at their posts and others furloughed at home without salary.

No president can afford to be overseas when the national government grinds to a halt. One might puzzle at the strangeness of the world’s most consequential military power shutting up shop, but the cost of the Covid-19 spending spree will damage many democracies in time.

Hitting the congressionally mandated debt ceiling was not a surprise, only a matter of time. That this domestic economic crisis crashed into Biden’s own international agenda is hardly an endorsement of White House crisis management skills.

Then there’s the President’s age. White House staff manage Biden’s travel to reduce the number of long-haul flights. As President, Biden has visited a country south of the equator only once: Indonesia for the G20 in November last year.

Biden’s last international visit was to the United Kingdom and Ireland for the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement. Biden has never been the clearest speaker, and it was sad to watch his mental sharpness decline, judging from his scripted and off-the-cuff public remarks.

Managing who the President sees, where he goes, what and when he does things will increasingly preoccupy Biden’s team. The great pity about cancelling the Sydney visit is that the Australia-US relationship could hardly be in a better shape. Scott Morrison’s AUKUS initiative, carried forward by Anthony Albanese, is the most important development in the alliance since the ANZUS Treaty was signed in 1951.

Alliances build real momentum for strategic change when political leaders drive them. For AUKUS to succeed in delivering nuclear-powered submarines and advanced military technology, Biden and Albanese need to set a priority and pace for activity that officials must sprint to deliver.

The planned Quad leaders meeting in Sydney, bringing together Albanese and Biden with prime ministers Narendra Modi of India and Fumio Kishida of Japan, would have been Australia’s most significant international meeting this year.

What has given the Quad purpose and priority has been the political endorsement of the four leaders. Absent that sustaining drive, any political forum risks defaulting to the more cautious instincts of officials.

What makes the Quad uniquely valuable is that it draws together the Indo-Pacific’s four most consequential democracies in an effort to counter Beijing’s authoritarian urge to dominate the region.

Hopefully in Hiroshima the G7 will create an opportunity to bring the Quad leaders together anyway. Japan and the US are G7 leaders, the Australian and Indian prime ministers are invited guests. That could most likely lead to a Quad side meeting that sustains leadership engagement.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875137

File: 942318f5cd064e6⋯.jpg (122.46 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_Angus….jpg)

File: 5ebccf9df52cb10⋯.jpg (69.46 KB,768x1024,3:4,US_President_Joe_Biden.jpg)

>>18875135

2/2

Biden also was due to become the first sitting US president to visit Papua New Guinea, where he also would have met Prime Minister James Marape and the leaders of other Pacific Islands Forum countries.

The US has made important ground with Pacific Island nations in the past few years, rebuilding a strategic presence and establishing new relationships in ways that weaken Beijing’s “money power” with island elites.

Washington is close to signing a defence co-operation agreement with PNG that would increase US military visits, exercises, fuel storage and logistic support.

This is an immensely useful development. In the blunt assessment of US Pacific Air Forces commander General Kenneth Wilsbach, talking with Japan’s Nikkei Asia: “Obviously we would like to disperse in as many places as we can to make the targeting problem for the Chinese as difficult as possible.

“A lot of those runways where we would operate from are in the Pacific Island nations.”

Military commanders think in terms of combat, but the closer relationships needed for defence co-operation hopefully will deter conflict from ever happening. AUKUS, the Quad and closer ties with the Pacific Islands sustain peace by building greater deterrence against Chinese aggression.

Another reason to be disappointed about Biden’s cancellation is that Albanese won’t hear directly from the President the likely American dismay at our failure to lift defence spending after the much-hyped review by Stephen Smith and Sir Angus Houston.

After promising the biggest defence shake-up in decades, the government’s mocked-up version of a public Defence Strategic Review delivered no new funding in the next four years, yet another review of the navy’s surface fleet and a botched redesign of the army aimed at saving money rather than modernising the force.

Australia’s closest supporters in Washington will be mystified by this development. As the Americans see it, they think they are going the extra mile to support Australia by giving us access to nuclear-powered submarine technology.

When Australia takes its foot off the defence accelerator the US will wonder what possible judgment we are making about Beijing’s trajectory that could justify such a bizarre change of strategic direction.

Washington is constantly assessing whether Australia is really up to the demands that AUKUS co-operation implies.

Failing to back our defence rhetoric with funding will have been noted. That type of complacency garners no presidential visits when other priorities are pressing.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/quad-takes-bad-hit-from-biden-noshow-says-peter-jennings/news-story/a2ec950c104e551b4babb78dd8cbf4f7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875151

File: ea4f4ac1e9532e5⋯.jpg (369.46 KB,1200x720,5:3,US_President_Joe_Biden_lef….jpg)

>>18860427

Biden skips two legs of trip, erodes US credibility

Chen Qingqing and Xie Jun - May 17, 2023

1/2

The US President Joe Biden decided to curtail his upcoming trip to the Asia-Pacific by canceling a visit to Australia and Papua New Guinea due to the ongoing debt ceiling negotiations in Washington, which, some Chinese experts said reflects that Washington only treats its so-called allies and partners as chess pieces and instrument, and when its domestic issues override its political agenda, it easily turns back on its commitment.

Meanwhile, a planned summit of Quad leaders in Sydney next week has been scrapped, which will affect US' diplomatic engagement with the Asia Pacific region, some experts said. Given its outstanding debt issue, the US has been facing a continuously declining power and sending out strategic confusion signals, arousing suspicion among its allies over its leadership and reputation, they noted.

Karine Jean-Pierre, White House Press Secretary, said in a statement on Tuesday that Biden spoke to Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese earlier Tuesday "to inform him that he will be postponing his trip to Australia." Biden's team engaged with the Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea's team to inform them as well. And the Biden administration looks forward to "finding other ways to engage with Australia, the Quad, Papua New Guinea and the leaders of the Pacific Islands Forum in the coming year," the statement said.

In Sydney, Biden had planned to attend a meeting of the four so-called Quad nations – the US, Japan, Australia and India, which was formed with a mind toward countering China's rising influence in the Asia-Pacific region, Reuters reported.

And in the PNG capital Port Moresby, Biden was originally due to attend a meeting of the 18-member Pacific Islands Forum, and sign security pacts with the host and with Micronesia, according to media report.

Biden is still scheduled to leave on Wednesday heading to Hiroshima, Japan, to attend a three-day G7 summit and will return to the country on Sunday. Some media reported that US Treasury Department has estimated that the US will go into a crippling default as early as June 1 if Congress does not lift the debt ceiling.

The AP described the "scuttling of two of the three legs of the overseas trip" is a foreign policy setback for an administration that has made putting a greater focus on the Pacific region central to its global outreach.

There has been palpable high expectation for Biden's trip to the two countries, especially the PNG, as some media earlier said "it would have been the first by a sitting US President to a Pacific country and comes as the two nations pursue a security pact."

"It shows that when its own domestic political demands override its international agenda, the US will turn back on its commitment with no hesitation," Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center at East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Wednesday.

The US has been forming such small cliques to counter China's influence in the Asia-Pacific but those countries should realize that their own interests are far more important than being manipulated by the US, especially when the declining US power only makes its strategy of containing China fragile, Chen said.

After the Cold War, the US began to ignore the South Pacific, removing some island embassies, and reducing assistance to the region. Recently, the US has opened a new embassy in Tonga, another country in the Pacific region, to counter China.

After seeing that China and the Pacific region are having more reciprocal cooperation, the US felt "the crisis" and the anxiety, and began wooing Pacific island countries through official visits and exerting political influence, analysts said.

"As the US treats its diplomacy as a bandage to fix ties with some countries, sending out a strategic confusion signal," Chen said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875156

File: bf606692beef594⋯.jpg (151.99 KB,1200x720,5:3,US_Quad_meeting_a_ruthless….jpg)

>>18875151

2/2

Eroding confidence

While the US politicians are mired in arguments about settlement of the debt ceiling which might lead to an imminent default in about two weeks, experts noted that this would bring about fluctuations on the global financial markets as well as erode global investors' confidence in US dollar assets in the long run.

According to a BBC report on Wednesday, Biden and Republican leaders have expressed cautious optimism that a deal to raise the US debt ceiling is within reach, but the report also cited House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy as saying that the two sides are still "far apart."

Liang Haiming, dean of Hainan University's Belt and Road Research Institute, told the Global Times on Wednesday that historically, US bond yields usually surge shortly before the US hits the debt ceiling.

"It's less than half a month before the US hits the debt ceiling this time. The US debt ceiling crisis will undoubtedly affect US dollar credit in the short term, lead to an increase in US bond yields and trigger global financial market turmoil," Liang said.

Liang also noted that the incident might bring a shadow to the G7 summit and weaken other members' viewpoints about the US.

"Those countries might feel that the US is a troublemaker in the international financial market instead of a leader," he said.

Dong Dengxin, director of the Finance and Securities Institute of the Wuhan University of Science and Technology, said that the impact of the incident on financial markets should be more of a long-term nature instead of short-term shockwaves.

"I think it's just a matter of time before US politicians agree on raising the debt ceiling. But such issues will definitely increase people's distrust about the US dollar and prompt them to take measures such as decreasing holdings of US assets, buying gold, renminbi or other non-dollar assets," Dong told the Global Times on Wednesday, adding that the process of "quantitative change" is already taking place, though at a slow pace.

There have been doubts over the US leadership not only in the international financial market but also on geopolitical landscape. Although the Quad leaders still plan to meet on the G7 sidelines in Japan, the canceled Quad meeting in Australia will surely affect such mechanism, especially when there have been divergences between the US and Australia over the AUKUS deal.

"It will surely affect the US' diplomatic engagement with the Asia Pacific. When the US woos its so-called allies and partners in the region, those countries would question whether the US policies have continuity or it would turn back on its commitment, doubting its leadership," Li Haidong, a professor at the Institute of International Relations at the China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times on Wednesday.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290885.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875192

File: dce723085faf356⋯.jpg (146.36 KB,1024x768,4:3,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>18860427

>>18875151

Kevin Rudd defends Joe Biden over cancelled trip to Australia

Tom Minear - May 19, 2023

US ambassador Kevin Rudd has rejected suggestions Joe Biden’s decision to cancel his trip to Australia and Papua New Guinea is a blow to America’s standing in the region, saying the diplomatic snub is a “very small thing”.

While the former prime minister acknowledged it was “disappointing”, he defended the US President’s call to fly home from the G7 summit in Japan this weekend so he could negotiate a deal to prevent the US government defaulting on its debts.

“I think we need to take a step back to pull out our smelling salts and say, look, the postponement of a presidential visit in the scheme of all this is quite small,” Dr Rudd told National Public Radio in the US.

“This is just one of those things that happens, and we get the intensity of the debate on the future of the debt ceiling in the Congress.”

But Daniel Russel, vice president for international security and diplomacy at the Asia Society Policy Institute – which was led by Dr Rudd before he became the ambassador in March – said there was “no question” Mr Biden’s call would be poorly received in the Indo-Pacific.

“It will be seen in the region as a self-inflicted wound caused by political polarisation in Washington that does not reflect well on America’s reliability as a partner,” he said.

American Enterprise Institute senior fellow Zack Cooper agreed the cancellation would do “real damage to the US argument that we are a reliable partner”.

And Ashley Townsend, a senior fellow for Indo-Pacific security at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the “optics couldn’t be worse”.

Mr Biden’s decision forced Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to scrap plans to hold the Quad summit at the Sydney Opera House next week, with the leaders to instead meet in Japan on the sidelines of the G7.

Dr Rudd said the Quad agenda would still be rolled out as planned, as he praised the overall strength of America’s relationships with its allies in the region including Australia.

“We’ve been around for a very long time with America. This alliance of ours has been through some 15 Australian prime ministers and 14 American presidents,” he told NPR.

“I think the relationship between the two of us is as robust and as intense as I’ve ever seen it across that span of history.”

He also shot down claims that Mr Biden’s cancellation was a diplomatic win for China.

“It’s not just a single visit that sums up the totality of the engagement of US and allied diplomacy over the last two and a half years,” Dr Rudd said.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/kevin-rudd-defends-joe-biden-over-cancelled-trip-to-australia/news-story/a61cc69ca0c1d295ff8a88b1af94efd6

https://www.npr.org/2023/05/18/1176806747/biden-cancels-australia-trip-quad-meeting

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875320

File: a4289c50309de92⋯.jpg (69.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chinese_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

File: ee090ec10954744⋯.jpg (98.32 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chinese_ambassador_Xiao_Qi….jpg)

>>18860427

>>18875151

Chinese mouthpiece Global Times says Quad been dealt ‘fatal blow’ and is in crisis

China has taken a fresh swipe at Australia, claiming one of our key alliances has been dealt a “fatal blow”.

Ellen Ransley - May 19, 2023

The future of the Quad has been dealt a “fatal blow” and is in decline, China says, and it sets the stage for other “US-led anti-China cliques” to suffer the same fate.

Hours after Beijing’s top diplomat in Australia, ambassador Xiao Qian, issued a warning to Australia’s leaders on its participation in the alliance, Chinese government mouthpiece the Global Times said the cancellation of the Quad is an “omen” of the summit’s fate.

The Quad, which was to be held in Sydney next week, was scrapped after Joe Biden was forced to cancel his travel plans to deal with domestic disputes over the country’s debt ceiling.

Western commentators have been quick to call it a “win” for China, noting the Quad is a tool to counter rising Chinese influence.

Chinese commentators have criticised the West for making the Quad about China; describing that language as another nail in the coffin for the future of the alliance, and further confirming it as a geopolitical tool against China.

“If Western observers still believe in Quad, their analyses should be full of content about innovative ways to contain China and make the West great again,” the Global Times article stated.

“There is no such wording, but only disappointment in the US.”

China said the US government wasn’t the only one “facing a crisis”, but the Quad more broadly.

“After all, it won't be easy to boost something that goes against the trend of the times,” China said.

The mouthpiece said the US should be concerned about its “crumbling credibility”, citing a “growing discussion” in Australia about the AUKUS submarine deal and whether Canberra would be “exploited” by Washington.

“When more and more such discussions, speculations, and doubts emerge, the dynamic of Quad will only decline,” China said.

“The cancellation of the Sydney summit is a fatal blow to Quad, experts said. It also foreshadows the fate of other US-led anti-China cliques.”

On Thursday, Mr Xiao would not be drawn on the cancelled summit, saying only that China wanted its “friendly partner” to consider its relationship with Beijing in the context of the alliance.

“Our position which is pretty clear, we hope that the members of the Quad, and especially Australia as a friendly partner to China, would take into consideration Australia’s interests to keep taking into consideration the relationship with China,” he said.

Mr Xiao announced on Thursday a winding back of timber trade impediments, in a win for Australia’s timber industry.

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong said it was the latest sign the relationship with China was stabilising.

“We see stabilising the relationship as encompassing co-operation where we can, disagreement where we must, and continued engagement,” she said from the Philippines on Thursday.

“We see stabilising as managing our differences wisely, and that means both countries manage their differences wisely.

“We hope that there is the removal of (further) trade impediments … We’ve made it clear to China that we think it’s in both countries’ interests for those trade impediments to be removed.”

https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/chinese-mouthpiece-global-times-says-quad-been-dealt-fatal-blow-and-is-in-crisis/news-story/f277e3b283d918f9623e714b29df039e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875329

File: dcf69f41d3f6a87⋯.jpg (186.29 KB,1200x720,5:3,Cancellation_of_Sydney_sum….jpg)

>>18860427

>>18875320

Cancellation of Sydney summit an omen of Quad's future fate

Global Times - May 18, 2023

The planned Quad summit in Sydney, scheduled for May 24, has been canceled as Biden is busy putting out the financial fire of a possible debt default at home. The leaders will meet later this week on G7 sidelines in Japan instead. But, even though the gathering continues, it won't be the same. The cancellation of the Sydney summit is an omen of Quad's fate.

The planned summit was called off mainly because the US government is going broke. Interestingly, some Western media outlets make it about China, portraying the case as China's champagne moment. On Wednesday, the Guardian published an article, "The cancelled Quad summit is a win for China and a self-inflicted blow to the US' Pacific standing," which claimed "Chinese state media outlets won't need to muster much creative energy to weave together some of Beijing's preferred narratives: that the US is racked by increasingly severe domestic upheaval and is an unreliable partner, quick to leave allies high and dry."

The narrative only proves the media has nothing more to talk about Quad, experts said. Such high-level summit is supposed to have many "high-end" perspectives to dig, yet now the Western media has no alternative but to cover it as a farce with gossip. It shows the US government and Quad have little to deliver. If there could be any practical and substantial agenda and content, the focus won't be placed on guessing what China will say, Shen Yi, a professor at Fudan University, told the Global Times.

If Western observers still believe in Quad, their analyses should be full of content about innovative ways to contain China and make the West great again. There is no such wording, but only disappointment in the US. It is not just the US government which is facing a crisis, but is also Quad. After all, it won't be easy to boost something that goes against the trend of the times.

Global economic recovery endures but the road is getting rocky, the IMF reported in April. Meanwhile, an increasing number of regional turmoil is rising. Yet the US makes no secret of its intention to exacerbate geopolitical conflicts and camp confrontation. Since the establishment of the Quad, their cooperation and statements have long revealed their unspoken target - China. And when people say a bump for Quad is a win for China, they just confess that Quad is a geopolitical tool against China.

That mindset is simply too shallow. Quite a few Western observers are so used to gauging the heart of a gentleman with their own mean measure. All countries worldwide are facing a difficult time. China, as a responsible major country, is playing a stabilizing role, in pursuit of common development. But such good will and efforts from China alone aren't enough. China hopes that the US can also bear some responsibility instead of being driven by selfish calculations and only worrying that others may profit from the US' challenges, Lü Xiang, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times.

Nevertheless, the Guardian does make one point right - the US should worry about its crumbling credibility.

When calling off its participation in Quad Sydney summit, the US is just like someone who used to be loaded, going on a shopping spree, cramming the shopping cart, but suddenly realizes, on the way to the checkout counter, his credit card may be declined. In other words, the US is failing to financially afford its global strategic objectives, which not only require huge amount of money, but is also confrontation-centered and against the trend of the times, Lü said.

And the expenses of US strategic objectives are not just shouldered by the US itself, but allotted to its allies. As the Guardian pointed out, the cancellation is a blow to the Australian host. "Officials had spent months extensively planning the huge logistical and security operation; last October's budget set aside $23m for the costs of hosting the summit," the report said. Now the investment is evaporated.

Moreover, Lü said there is also growing discussion in Australia about whether the country is bearing the cost of an expensive mistake over the AUKUS submarine deal, and if Australia will realize development or just be exploited by the US.

When more and more such discussions, speculations, and doubts emerge, the dynamic of Quad will only decline. The cancellation of the Sydney summit is a fatal blow to Quad, experts said. It also foreshadows the fate of other US-led anti-China cliques.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290956.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875383

File: a73faa51c9c9bac⋯.jpg (5.74 MB,7807x5205,7807:5205,Trade_Minister_Don_Farrell….jpg)

>>18835358

Playing the long game on China trade

China breaks the rules, and then tries to win further concessions in exchange for ending disputes of its own choosing.

John Lee, Foreign policy expert - May 15, 2023

1/2

There were high hopes, but Trade Minister Don Farrell arrived back from China empty-handed. Conversation was apparently amicable. We were given assurances Chinese review of tariffs against Australian barley imports is on track.

That’s effectively Beijing telling us it will remove restrictions on Australian exports in its own good time and according to its own opaque priorities and principles. As usual, China is playing a longer game. We need to as well.

It might seem strange to raise this here but bear with me. Several weeks ago, Xi Jinping proposed a peace plan in Ukraine which included a cease-fire and negotiations without Russia giving up any of the territory it has seized since February 2022, and certainly not the Crimean Peninsula which Moscow forcible annexed in 2014.

Our trade dispute with China presents a very different context and the stakes are far lower.

But it is the same strategy being deployed by Beijing: normalise coercive and illegitimate behaviour before offering the prospect of stabilisation and relief as a gesture of grace and friendship in exchange for significant concessions by the other side.

What does China want? Most immediately, it wants Australia to drop our cases against it in the World Trade Organisation on behalf of our barley and wine exporters. It was a tactical mistake by the current government to suspend the WTO cases prior to Farrell’s meeting.

In dealing with a government not acting in good faith having imposed politically motivated trade punishments, suspending the WTO process prior to departure only weakened Farrell’s leverage when in Beijing.

Now that no immediate end to the tariffs were offered, the cases before the WTO should be immediately resumed.

To be sure, China had promised to expedite its review process for its tariffs against Australian barley and wine, which it affirmed during Farrell’s visit.

Nevertheless, there are more serious issues than just negotiation tactics as the reasoning behind escalating these disputes to the WTO remain valid. The Chinese measures have been in place against Australian barley and wine exporters since 2020 and 2021 respectively meaning we have suffered unjustified economic loss for an extended time.

Even if Beijing agrees to wind back its tariffs over the next few months following a spurious internal review of the measures against us, there will be no compensation for previous losses.

Moreover, we know Chinese measures against Australia is part of its standard diplomacy and tradecraft against other countries. In this case, Beijing foolishly admitted its tariffs and bans were payback for Australian domestic and external policies, most infamously confirmed in document of 14 grievances issued by China’s former ambassador in November 2021.

In the past few years, similar illegitimate moves have been made against economies such as Lithuania, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Canada, the Philippines, and the United Kingdom.

China suffers no economic or institutional injury if it can simply use bilateral processes to negotiate its way back to square one without any formal adjudication that its measures were unjustified in the first place.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875394

File: 483c6fe217d5764⋯.jpg (5.73 MB,7046x4700,3523:2350,China_demands_fair_play_fo….jpg)

>>18875383

2/2

Note that Brazil, Canada, Taiwan, the European Union, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the United States and Vietnam joined as third parties to Australia’s WTO action against China regarding the wine dispute.

Thirteen economies joined the corresponding Australian action on barley restrictions. Third parties are admitted if they can demonstrate a “substantial interest” in the case and are afforded the right to make submissions on the issues under arbitration.

Clearly, they believe there is much at stake when it comes to whether coercive Chinese measures are formally identified as unjust and illegitimate or simply allowed to be quietly wound back at a time of Beijing’s choosing. For those who favour the quiet bilateral approach, in this context this pathway weakens rather than reaffirms the relevance of the WTO regime and rules.

A further question is what else China wants for ending what it should not have imposed on Australian exporters in the first place.

Behind all the current talk about stabilisation of the relationship by both countries, there is no genuine truce or pause in Beijing seeking to expand its influence, if need be, at the expense of Australian autonomy and interests.

To Labor’s credit, it has demonstrated it is not for turning when it comes to key strategic and defence policies. Beijing has realised trying to change Australian commitment to AUKUS, ANZUS, or the Quad is pointless.

Instead, Beijing will seek to seduce or intimidate Australia in areas that do not overtly concern security and defence.

These include Australia agreeing to formally begin the process of considering China’s application to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership while denying that prospect to Taiwan.

This would leave Japan stranded as the country least agreeable to Chinese membership and more supportive of Taiwanese ascension.

Beijing wants less Australian activism against Chinese attempts to dominate global bodies such as the various specialised agencies in the United Nations covering geopolitically important areas such as development, health, human rights, intellectual property rights, and aviation.

More broadly, China wants Australian leaders and diplomats to not just speak more quietly but become less proactive and creative than we have been over the past few years when pursuing our interests.

Inviting Farrell and offering the prospect of future relief is just one step in that process.

Adjunct professor John Lee is a non-resident senior fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington. From 2016 to 2018, he was senior adviser to the Australian foreign minister.

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/playing-the-long-game-on-china-trade-20230514-p5d87x

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875410

File: fc7ae85e859195e⋯.jpg (791.4 KB,3421x2281,3421:2281,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 88e708cb3dff998⋯.jpg (334.07 KB,1968x1312,3:2,Canadian_Prime_Minister_Ju….jpg)

>>18835358

>>18865928

Albanese confirms Beijing invite, says China must remove trade bans

Eryk Bagshaw - May 19, 2023

Hiroshima: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sharpened his calls for China to remove all remaining trade restrictions on Australia as he prepares to meet world leaders at the G7, where Beijing’s use of economic coercion will dominate key forums.

Confirming for the first time that he has officially been invited to Beijing and that a Quad meeting has been scheduled in Hiroshima, Albanese said it was important “that any of the impediments to trade between China and Australia be lifted”.

China on Thursday lifted a ban on $600 million worth of Australian timber, but sanctions on wine, seafood and several other industries remain in place after years of disputes over human rights and national security.

The trade strikes were first condemned by the G7 last year, but China’s use of economic coercion is now expected to become a key part of the final leaders’ communiqué released on Sunday. Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida raised responses to China, North Korea and Russia in his meetings with British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Thursday.

Challenging Beijing after months of steadily improving relations, Albanese said it “was important that China show the world that it does believe in trade according to international norms”.

The invitation to Beijing is expected to coincide with the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s first visit to China as prime minister, but Albanese’s comments on Friday revealed that he has yet to accept that invitation given the ongoing hurdles in the relationship.

“I have been invited to visit the People’s Republic of China, I’ve always said that we would warmly welcome engagement on the relationship with China,” he said.

G7 leaders are also expected to discuss further sanctions against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will join the meeting in person on Sunday – in what will be the furthest trip from his war-torn country.

In a statement released on Friday evening, the G7 leaders said they stood together against “Russia’s illegal, unjustifiable, and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine”.

“We condemn, in the strongest terms, Russia’s manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations and the impact of Russia’s war on the rest of the world,” the leaders of the world’s seven richest economies said.

“We will starve Russia of G7 technology, industrial equipment and services that support its war machine.”

In a warning to third parties, the G7 said it reiterated its call to “immediately cease providing material support to Russia’s aggression, or face severe costs”. In March, the US confirmed that rounds of Chinese ammunition have been used on battlefields in Ukraine, but Beijing has denied it has sent arms to Russia.

China’s Foreign Ministry has criticised the G7 as an attempt to contain China’s rise and accused it of undermining developing nations.

Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday called for the “brethren in Central Asia” to unite against attempts to divide the China-Central Asia Summit in Xian. Beijing is hosting the summit at the same time as the G7 as it looks to push its vision for an international order less dominated by those gathered in Hiroshima.

Albanese met with Lula da Silva, the leader of one of China’s growing partners, Brazil, on Friday afternoon.

“I want to build a relationship with him. I’ll have an open and frank discussion about the challenges which are facing the region,” he said. “I’d like to see Brazil and other South American countries play a greater role as well as the United States in the Pacific. And that’s one of the things that I’ll be raising with the president.”

The prime minister also met with South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday as Seoul moves closer towards Japan and the United States under his People Power Party.

Albanese said a time for a rescheduled Quad meeting over the weekend had been confirmed but was not ready to be announced after President Joe Biden last week pulled out of his Australia visit due to the US debt crisis.

“It will be a shortened format, but a lot of the work that has been undertaken with President Biden with Prime Minister Kishida and (Indian) Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi,” he said.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/albanese-confirms-beijing-invite-says-china-must-remove-trade-bans-20230519-p5d9qq.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875476

File: 2140e38894dced4⋯.jpg (1.58 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Australia_s_former_defence….jpg)

File: 812b0546e6948c9⋯.jpg (1.64 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Sir_Angus_Houston_says_the….jpg)

>>18744386

Former defence chief Angus Houston hits out at China, warns of 'miscalculation' leading to possible military conflict

Andrew Greene - 18 May 2023

One of the co-authors of Labor's Defence Strategic Review has sharply criticised Beijing's growing military activity in the South China Sea, accusing the emerging superpower of undermining Australia's national interest.

Just weeks after the release of the DSR, former defence chief Sir Angus Houston has also expressed concern about the lack of lethality with the Royal Australian Navy's surface fleet and blasted the slow progress in producing missiles locally.

Appearing at the Washington-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Sir Angus has highlighted the gradual fortification of island and reefs in the strategic waterways of the South China Sea.

"That contravenes the global rules-based order and from an Australian point of view certainly undermines our national interest — the South China Sea is incredibly important to us."

"There's always the potential for some form of misunderstanding or miscalculation which could result in some sort of serious incident, or even worse, some form of conflict," he added.

Speaking publicly for the first time since the government published a declassified version of the DSR, the retired air chief marshal warned Australia's defence strategy through half a century of regional peace now "just doesn't cut it" and had to be transformed.

Sir Angus repeated his warnings that Australia was now facing "the worst strategic circumstances in my lifetime" – including China's "incredible build-up of military power" with "no transparency, no assurance, no explanation".

Australia's naval ships are not lethal enough

The Albanese government's response to the DSR last month included the surprise announcement of another "short, sharp" review of the Royal Australian Navy's surface fleet, which will be headed by a retired US Admiral.

The fresh analysis will examine plans to construct up to nine Hunter-class frigates, a project which has come under recent stinging criticism from the auditor general.

"We were concerned about the cost of the program, we were concerned about the associated schedule and the risks," Sir Angus told an audience at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies.

"At this stage, the first vessel off the line that's under production at the moment would arrive in the early 2030s. We think we need more lethality before we get to that point."

He suggested Australia is likely to have its first American imported Virginia-class submarine before the first Adelaide built Hunter-class frigate is completed, which is now due to be delivered in 2033.

The former defence chief was scathing of the lack of action on the Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordinance Enterprise, which was first announced in 2021 to produced locally made missiles.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-18/former-defence-chief-angus-houston-hits-out-at-china/102365210

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zELEdY7oxX4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875491

File: 67a38f98d842698⋯.jpg (145.46 KB,1279x720,1279:720,The_future_Independence_va….jpg)

File: 99e9e89a5d3e1a1⋯.jpg (179.95 KB,1279x720,1279:720,In_April_this_year_tugboat….jpg)

File: 932cc3c47ea1fb4⋯.jpg (64.96 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Sub_Lieutenant_Jaycob_Hump….jpg)

>>18670474

US warship to honour Canberra, cement AUKUS deal

For first time in 229 years the US Navy will commission one of its warships in a foreign power with a ceremony in Sydney to cement AUKUS pact.

Charles Miranda - May 19, 2023

We might not see their president any time soon but the United States has dispatched a warship to Australia to reinforce the AUKUS alliance through its formal commissioning in Sydney Harbour.

For the first time in its 229 year history, the US Navy will commission one of its warships in a foreign country and name it after our capital Canberra in what will be a significant show of goodwill.

While that event will be a spectacular military affair in July, it came as the US State Department more discreetly approved the sale of AUD$313 million worth of sonar tech to boost Australia’s maritime early warning systems to counter China’s lurking maritime force.

According to US Defence, that sensitive tactical underwater kit will allow for “detection and cuing of enemy submarines” and was in US interest to “support not alter” the Indo-Pacific military balance.

The future USS Canberra will join the US fleet after its commissioning in what the US promises will be “a celebration it deserves” before it takes part in ADF exercise Talisman Sabre 2023. The Royal Australian Navy is understood to be preparing a fleet to welcome it to Australia ahead of its unique commissioning.

“I can think of no better way to signify our enduring partnership with Australia than celebrating the newest US Navy warship named for Australia’s capital city and commissioning her in RAN Fleet Base East surrounded by many of the Australian ships we have worked alongside for years,” said US Secretary of Navy Carlos Del Toro.

RAN chief Vice Adm. Mark Hammond said commissioning a US ship in a foreign port for the first time in history highlighted historical ties to the navies’ modern day partnership.

“It will be a historical event to see the USS Canberra and HMAS Canberra alongside each other in Sydney. As we look to the future, the strength of our partnership remains a cornerstone of a secure, stable, free and open Indo-Pacific Region,” he said.

Curiously, the ship’s sponsor will be Coalition Senator Marise Payne who as the former foreign minister attended the ship’s US keel laying ceremony in 2020, ironically by its manufacturer the Australian global shipbuilding giant Austal.

The USS Canberra is a littoral combat ship designed for open ocean combat but also rapid shore insertion and deployment of troops and armaments.

Meanwhile the US Defense Department confirmed the State Department had approved the Australian Federal Government’s request to buy the Lockheed Martin designed Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System Expeditionary (SURTASS-E) mission systems.

The system gets towed behind a ship to enable sonar detection of diesel and nuclear powered submarines in real time.

The RAN has warned it needed to counter China’s rapidly growing fleet of submarines already known to have made numerous forays off Australia’s coastline. The new kit could be hosted by the Navy’s newest ship the $110m Undersea Support Vessel ADV Guidance procured last month.

“This proposed sale will support the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States. Australia is one of our most important allies in the Western Pacific,” the US Defense said. “The strategic location of this political and economic power contributes significantly to ensuring peace and economic stability in the region. It is vital to the U.S. national interest to assist our ally in developing and maintaining a strong and ready self-defense capability.”

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/us-warship-to-honour-canberra-cement-aukus-deal/news-story/db46eac6159f69da0230f175efb3a696

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875585

File: 4c9b2919e8349e4⋯.jpg (472.28 KB,1982x846,991:423,Acceptance_trials_November….jpg)

File: 61e5cdf7c29d4aa⋯.jpg (624.46 KB,1324x1800,331:450,Acceptance_trials_November….jpg)

>>18875491

USS Canberra Will Join the U.S. Fleet in Australia to Honor Namesake

Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet - 18 May 2023

1/2

SAN DIEGO - The future USS Canberra (LCS 30) will join the U.S. Navy active fleet on July 22 with the U.S. Navy’s first international commissioning ceremony at the Royal Australian Navy Fleet Base East in Sydney, Australia.

The future USS Canberra (LCS 30) will join the U.S. Navy active fleet on July 22 with the U.S. Navy’s first international commissioning ceremony at the Royal Australian Navy Fleet Base East in Sydney, Australia.

Canberra is the first U.S. Navy warship to be commissioned in an allied country. It is the second U.S. Navy ship to bear the namesake of Canberra.

“I can think of no better way to signify our enduring partnership with Australia than celebrating the newest U.S. Navy warship named for Australia’s capital city, and commissioning her in Royal Australian Navy Fleet Base East surrounded by many of the Australian ships we have worked alongside for years,” said Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro. “I look forward to this momentous day for the ship, crew, sponsor, and all our partners in government and industry who worked tirelessly to give the future USS Canberra the celebration it deserves.”

Australian Chief of Navy, Vice Adm. Mark Hammond said this historic event encapsulates both the depth of the historical ties, and modern day partnership between the Royal Australian Navy and the U.S. Navy.

“This is a unique demonstration of respect by the U.S. for the Officers and Sailors of the Royal Australian Navy,” said Hammond. “It is an opportunity to reflect on our shared history, and on a friendship forged while fighting side-by-side. On August 9, 1942 the RAN heavy cruiser HMAS Canberra was severely damaged off Guadalcanal (Solomon Islands) while protecting the U.S. Marines fighting ashore. In a surprise attack by a powerful Japanese naval force, Canberra was hit 24 times in less than two minutes and 84 of her crew were killed including Captain Frank Getting”

“I look forward to welcoming the U.S. Navy, and the crew of USS Canberra to Australia and we are honored to host the U.S. Navy’s first international commissioning. It will be a historical event to see the USS Canberra and HMAS Canberra alongside each other in Sydney. As we look to the future, the strength of our partnership remains a cornerstone of a secure, stable, free and open Indo-Pacific Region.”

The first USS Canberra (CA-70/CAG-2) was named at the direction of President Franklin D. Roosevelt in honor of the Australian heavy cruiser HMAS Canberra for the ship’s courageous actions during the Battle of Savo Island that took place Aug. 7-9, 1942. The new Baltimore-class heavy cruiser was renamed Canberra from Pittsburgh on Oct. 16, 1942, and was commissioned on Oct. 14, 1943.

Canberra will soon begin the transit for the Navy’s first international ship commissioning making stops along the transit in Indo-Pacific nations prior to its arrival in Sydney for commissioning.

A visit to the Australian capital city of Canberra is planned the day after commissioning, continuing the U.S. Navy tradition of building a strong relationship with namesake communities.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875594

File: 291b9c9a8ac0fa5⋯.jpg (604.92 KB,1800x1409,1800:1409,Acceptance_trials_November….jpg)

File: 203186209bf6cd0⋯.jpg (421.49 KB,1399x1800,1399:1800,LCS_30_USS_Canberra.jpg)

>>18875585

2/2

The ship’s sponsor is Australian Senator, the Honourable Marise Payne, the former Australian Minister of Foreign Affairs who attended the ship’s keel laying ceremony in Mobile, Ala. in 2020. The ship was christened June 5, 2021, by Alison Petchell, the Australian Government’s Defence Assistant Secretary for Industrial Capability Planning in the Nuclear Submarines Taskforce and former Minister Counsellor for Defense Materiel, on behalf of Senator Payne. The ship arrived for the first time at its homeport of San Diego last year.

The first U.S. Navy ship named after a foreign capital, Canberra (CA-70) was sponsored by Lady Alice C. Dixon, the wife of Sir Owen Dixon, then Australian Minister to the United States. Following World War II, Canberra was placed out of commission and in reserve on March 7, 1947. Five years later, the ship was selected to be the U.S. Navy’s second guided missile cruiser. The ship was re-commissioned on June 15, 1956, as guided missile heavy cruiser CAG-2.

With its new designation, Canberra transported President Dwight D. Eisenhower and later was the ceremonial flagship for the selection of the Unknown Serviceman of both World War II and Korea interned at Arlington National Cemetery, was the Commander of the Atlantic Fleet Cruiser Force flagship, conducted an around the globe goodwill cruise, provided medical assistance to the crew of the Turkish merchantman Mehmet Ipar, was the Commander Task Group 136.1 flagship that was charged with maintaining a blockade during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and served in Korea and Vietnam. To highlight the ship’s role in naval gunfire support following operations in Vietnam, Canberra was re-designated to original classification and identification number CA-70 on May 1, 1968.

Canberra received seven battle stars for her service in World War II. The ship was decommissioned on Feb. 2, 1970, and was stricken from the Naval Vessel Register on July 31, 1978.

The present day USS Canberra is the 16th Independence-variant Littoral Combat Ship commissioned by the U.S. Navy. LCS are designed to be fast, optimally-manned, mission-tailored, surface combatants that operate in both littoral and open-ocean environments. LCS integrate with joint, combined, crewed, and unmanned systems to support forward-presence, maritime security, sea control, and deterrence missions around the globe. The future USS Canberra was built by Austal USA in Mobile, Alabama.

https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/3400522/uss-canberra-will-join-the-us-fleet-in-australia-to-honor-namesake/

https://www.seaforces.org/usnships/lcs/LCS-30-USS-Canberra.htm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875613

File: f0f117c546b1984⋯.jpg (2.14 MB,4451x3453,4451:3453,Police_linked_Kempton_Cowa….jpg)

File: 2d2e2e349930cd8⋯.jpg (1.84 MB,3263x2447,3263:2447,Cowan_was_arrested_last_ye….jpg)

File: 67c8ecd9e0c8942⋯.jpg (163.89 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Cowan_was_CEO_of_Joondalup….jpg)

File: a10d17181ba70a7⋯.jpg (2.21 MB,4040x3113,4040:3113,Cowan_was_charged_with_add….jpg)

Former Joondalup Health Campus CEO Kempton Cowan pleads guilty over child sex abuse videos

Joanna Menagh - 19 May 2023

The former head of one of Western Australia's largest hospitals is facing a jail term after pleading guilty to accessing, soliciting and transmitting child abuse material.

Kempton Cowan, 56, the one-time chief executive officer of the Joondalup Health Campus, appeared in the Magistrates Court on Friday and pleaded guilty to a total of 11 charges.

He was first arrested by Australian Federal Police (AFP) in March last year after videos of girls being sexually abused were found during a search of his home in the western Perth suburb of Mosman Park.

A record was also discovered of an online request for child abuse material.

The search of Cowan's home followed a referral from Interpol about a teenager in the United Kingdom who had told police she had online communications with an Australian-based man.

Cowan was then linked to the messaging accounts that had been used.

More charges after devices examined

Cowan was the chief executive officer of the Joondalup Health Campus between 2002 and 2020.

He initially faced four charges, but in November, after a forensic examination of his electronic devices, he was charged with another nine offences.

The 11 charges he admitted today included causing child abuse material to be transmitted, soliciting child abuse material and possessing it.

Two charges were discontinued.

Each offence Cowan pleaded guilty to carries a maximum jail term of 15 years.

His bail was renewed until he faces the District Court in July to be sentenced.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-19/kempton-cowan-pleads-guilty-over-child-sexual-abuse-videos/102367042

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875625

File: e8747343d3d194d⋯.jpg (99.52 KB,1240x744,5:3,Peter_Hollingworth_has_dec….jpg)

>>18744576

>>18835321

Peter Hollingworth’s decision to cease practising as a priest not enough, abuse survivors say

Beth Heinrich and others want former archbishop to be defrocked and stripped of holy orders

Christopher Knaus - 18 May 2023

Abuse survivors are maintaining a push for Peter Hollingworth to be defrocked despite the former archbishop’s decision to cease practising as a priest, urging the Anglican church to “finally do the right thing”.

Hollingworth last week announced he would voluntarily cease practising as a priest, handing back his permission to officiate after a continued outcry over his failures to act on pedophile priests while Brisbane archbishop in the 1990s, before his time as Australia’s 23rd governor general.

His decision came weeks after a convoluted and protracted church complaints body handed down its decision, finding he engaged in multiple instances of misconduct but should be allowed to continue in his priestly duties regardless.

The decision met fury from survivors and campaigners, who say the punishment did not reflect the grave findings made against Hollingworth.

In deciding to hand back his permission to officiate, Hollingworth acknowledged his continuing role in the church was a “cause of pain to survivors” and said he wanted to end the distress.

But Beth Heinrich, an abuse survivor whose complaint against Hollingworth was central to the church’s internal complaints process, has written to the church’s professional standards committee, warning it against considering the decision as a “satisfactory outcome”.

Heinrich and other survivors are calling on the committee to press ahead with an appeal against last month’s decision. She wants Hollingworth to be defrocked.

“I ask you to appeal to the board to finally do the right thing and depose Hollingworth of Holy Orders,” she wrote. “To allow a priest of the Anglican faith to remain so after refusing on innumerable occasions to support victims of sexual abuse is a scandal.”

The decision against Hollingworth found he had committed misconduct over his handling of abuse complaints against two clergy members, John Elliot and Donald Shearman, whom he allowed to remain in the church despite knowing they had sexually assaulted children.

It also found he had made unsatisfactory and insensitive comments about Heinrich during a 2002 episode of the ABC television program Australian Story. The 2002 comments appeared to blame Heinrich for her abuse. Hollingworth has previously denied that was his intention.

The decision shows that the professional standards committee had not previously pressed for a revocation of holy orders. The final decision did not recommend the lesser step of removing his permission to officiate, finding that he posed no unacceptable risk of harm by continuing in his priestly duties, despite the misconduct.

“For some, that misconduct demonstrated fundamental defects in his character such as to render him unfit to hold Holy Orders,” the professional standards board found.

“For others, his grave errors stemmed from failures of understanding rather than moral deficiencies. We believe that the second view is correct.”

The decision, and the suggestion that his errors arose from a lack of understanding, frustrated survivor groups, who wrote to the church pointing out that Hollingworth had signed a 1995 document acknowledging his awareness of the harms caused by pedophiles.

Hollingworth was approached for a response.

His lawyer, Bill Doogue, has previously contested the significance of the 1995 document for the board’s findings, telling the Australian: “A full and fair reading of the board’s findings would show that there was expert evidence that Dr Hollingworth had engaged in a lot of learning after he resigned as governor general [in 2003] and developed a deeper understanding of the effects of child abuse.”

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/18/peter-hollingworths-decision-to-cease-practising-as-a-priest-not-enough-abuse-survivors-say

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875639

File: b79b520e4b74cb3⋯.jpg (373.31 KB,1366x2048,683:1024,347580920_1495643307930769….jpg)

File: 16aa8ea977e2d27⋯.jpg (494.66 KB,2048x1386,1024:693,347447352_283111814097658_….jpg)

File: 3351c47db6665ab⋯.jpg (742.75 KB,2048x1317,2048:1317,347583206_1220982881948719….jpg)

File: fe621c0750e990c⋯.jpg (540.76 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,347588424_229316546407199_….jpg)

File: 0b0f1264a3a3b10⋯.jpg (468.87 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,347557884_1403716227114856….jpg)

>>18676841

Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post

18 May 2023

Ambassador Caroline Kennedy, 27th U.S. Ambassador to Australia, visits Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, in the midst of Exercise Crocodile Response at Darwin, Australia, May 17, 2023.

During her visit, Ambassador Kennedy experienced a ride in the MV-22B Osprey over the city of Darwin, met with key leaders of Marine Rotational Force Darwin, Defence Australia, and Indonesian National Armed Forces, and received an exercise overview briefing.

Exercise Crocodile Response seeks to extend shared interoperability with partners throughout the Indo-Pacific region, increasing efficiencies in responding to Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief. #USEmbassy #FreeandOpenIndoPacific #AlliesandPartners

(U.S. Marine Corps photo by LCpl Brayden Daniel and Sgt. Ryan Hageali)

https://www.facebook.com/MRFDarwin/posts/615238730638614

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875704

File: 5d0b0f41b8e0f31⋯.mp4 (12.47 MB,852x480,71:40,Obama_Praises_Australia_Fo….mp4)

>>18587912 (pb)

Obama Praises Australia For Confiscating Citizens’ Guns

HAROLD HUTCHISON - May 16, 2023

Former President Barack Obama praised Australia’s gun confiscation following a mass shooting during an interview that aired Tuesday morning.

“We are unique among advanced, developed nations in tolerating, on a routine basis, gun violence in the form of shootings, mass shootings, suicides,” Obama told “CBS This Morning” co-host Nate Burleson. “In Australia, you had one mass shooting 50 years ago and they said, ‘No, we’re not doing that anymore.’ That is normally how you would expect a society to respond when your children are at risk.”

Australia carried out a mandatory “buy back” of semi-automatic rifles and shotguns after a 1996 mass shooting in Port Arthur. Obama previously praised Australia for its gun control laws while President, including in 2014.

“I think somehow — and there are a lot of historical reasons for this — gun ownership in this country became an ideological issue and a partisan issue in ways that it shouldn’t be,” Obama told Burleson. “It has become sort of a proxy for arguments about our culture wars. Instead of thinking about it in a very pragmatic way, we end up really arguing about identity and emotion and all kinds of stuff that does not have to do with keeping our children safe.”

President Joe Biden, Congressional Democrats, media figures and celebrities demanded a ban on so-called “assault weapons” in the wake of mass shootings in a Nashville school, a bank in Louisville and an outlet mall in Allen, Texas.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/05/16/obama-praises-australia-for-confiscating-citizens-guns/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875725

File: ffd68959719c49c⋯.jpg (156.53 KB,634x476,317:238,Liverpool_Girls_High_Schoo….jpg)

File: 4b889b6391d3e0e⋯.jpg (51.7 KB,634x423,634:423,Australian_school_imposes_….jpg)

File: d27b5b9c1873f45⋯.jpg (71.49 KB,634x604,317:302,Former_deputy_chief_health….jpg)

Australian school imposes a mask mandate after a Covid outbreak among students - sparking outrage from parents and top doctor: 'No child should be compelled to wear one'

BRETT LACKEY and DANYAL HUSSAIN - 18 May 2023

A high school has brought back a Covid mask mandate more than six months after they were entirely scrapped across the country, sparking backlash.

Liverpool Girls' High School in Sydney's southwest announced on Tuesday that Year 9, 10 and 11 students would have to work from home immediately, while all staff and students still in school would have to wear masks.

The school initially announced a five-day mask mandate for all pupils amid a small outbreak in Covid cases, before sending some students home when numbers increased.

The last remnants of widespread mask rules, requiring them to be used on international flights and on public transport, were removed in Australia in September last year.

Dr Nick Coatsworth, who is well known as the face of the government's Covid vaccine rollout, told Daily Mail Australia that mask rules being reintroduced at the school was worrying.

'That is a problem. No child at an Australian school should be compelled to wear a mask,' the former Australian deputy chief health officer said.

Liverpool Girls' High School introduced the measures after recently having a high number of students test positive to Covid.

They initially advised that as of Monday this week all students, staff and visitors to the school would need to wear masks for the next five days.

But on Tuesday afternoon, when more students tested positive, they asked years 9, 10 and 11 to learn from home from Wednesday until Friday.

Years 7, 8 and 12 are still attending school in person and are required to wear masks.

One parent who asked to remain anonymous told Daily Mail Australia that she doesn't want to see a return to the draconian restrictions imposed during the Covid pandemic.

'There was no consultation with parents at all,' she said.

'No one else in the community is being forced to wear masks again so it doesn't seem fair our kids are.'

She added that she was told students who refuse to wear masks would be sent to the deputy principal's office and their parents will be called .

'It's quite frustrating as my daughter is in year 10 and doesn't like home schooling,' she said.

'We're just hoping it doesn't get worse over the winter period and result in all the kids learning from home again.

'I think we need to learn to live with it and treat it as we would a cold or flu. I'm not angry, I just find it frustrating because it makes it hard for the kids.'

Dr Coatsworth has previously been a vocal opponent of masks rules in schools saying there was an 'overemphasis on the benefits of masking kids'.

'You're not actually protecting the kids themselves because it's a very, very mild disease in children with or without the vaccine,' he said.

While there could be a risk of a child passing the virus onto a frail relative, he said with proper precautions such as washing hands, rapid antigen tests and vaccines the added benefit of masks in children was low.

'I have trouble communicating with my patients (while wearing a mask). It's hard for them to hear me, it's hard for them to know who I am, and if that's hard for me then I can only conclude that it would be detrimental to kids.'

Infectious diseases expert Peter Collignon told Daily Mail Australia: 'Masks don't really make a difference to community epidemic curves, though they do provide some personal protection'.

'Probably not as big a reduction (in exposure to infection) as people think - it's not an 80 per cent reduction, probably closer to 10 per cent.'

Meanwhile, another NSW school, Orange High School in the state's central-west, also announced learning from home will take place for students in Year 7 through to Year 10 this week amid a small outbreak of Covid cases.

The announcement impacts one grade each day - though year 11 and year 12 students will be exempt from the guideline.

Principal Ali McLennan wrote to parents: 'Due to the impact of COVID-19 some of our students and teaching staff cannot attend school.

'The positive COVID-19 cases have particularly impacted our staff.'

'Students who cannot learn from home will be provided supervision should they attend school,' Ms McLennan added.

Daily Mail Australia has contacted Liverpool Girls' High School, the NSW education department and Premier Chris Minns' office for comment.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12092975/Liverpool-Girls-High-School-brings-Covid-mask-rules-amid-criticism-Nick-Coatsworth.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875740

File: 26bd87957d062ee⋯.jpg (88.47 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_financier_Jeffrey_Epste….jpg)

>>18805504

Deutsche Bank to pay $US75m to settle Jeffrey Epstein accusers’ suit

JAMES FANELLI and KHADEEJA SAFDAR - MAY 18, 2023

1/2

Deutsche Bank has agreed to pay $US75m ($113m) to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging the financial institution facilitated Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring, said lawyers who sued the bank on behalf of alleged victims.

A woman who is listed anonymously as Jane Doe in court papers filed the suit last year in New York on behalf of herself and other accusers of the disgraced financier. She alleged Deutsche Bank did business with Epstein for five years while knowing that he was using money in his bank accounts to further his sex-trafficking activity.

The Doe plaintiff alleged she was sexually abused by Epstein and trafficked to his friends from about 2003 until about 2018 and was also paid in cash for sex acts. The lawsuit alleged Deutsche Bank ignored red flags including payments to numerous young women. The settlement is expected to compensate dozens of accusers.

Epstein died by suicide in a federal jail in New York in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges.

Dylan Riddle, a spokesman for Deutsche Bank, declined to comment on the settlement but said the bank had invested more than €4bn to bolster controls, training and operational processes, and had increased the size of its workforce dedicated to fighting financial crime. “In recent years Deutsche Bank has made considerable progress in remedying a number of past issues,” he said.

The bank didn’t admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement, according to people familiar with the matter.

The plaintiffs’ lawyers, from the law firms Boies Schiller Flexner and Edwards Pottinger, said on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) they believed the $US75m was the largest sex-trafficking settlement involving a banking institution.

“This groundbreaking settlement is the culmination of two law firms conducting more than a decade-long investigation to hold one of Epstein’s financial banking partners responsible for the role it played in facilitating his trafficking organisation,” they said in a joint statement.

The Deutsche Bank complaint was one of two lawsuits that took aim at banks for allegedly enabling Epstein to recruit and groom hundreds of underage girls and young women for sex with himself and his associates. The suits were filed in November when New York State opened a year-long window during which people who say they were sexually assaulted could file lawsuits, no matter when the conduct occurred.

The other lawsuit, filed by the same law firms, is against JPMorgan Chase. The US Virgin Islands also sued JPMorgan late last year, saying the bank facilitated Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking and abuse by allowing the late financier to remain a client and helping him send money to his victims. Both suits against JPMorgan are ongoing, and Jamie Dimon, the bank’s chief executive, is scheduled to be deposed in the cases later this month, according to people familiar with the matter.

JPMorgan declined to comment on the Deutsche Bank settlement. “In hindsight, any association with Epstein was a mistake and we regret it, but we do not believe we violated any laws,” a JPMorgan spokeswoman has said. “We are committed to combating human trafficking and we will continue to look for ways to invest in advancing this important mission.”

The Deutsche Bank settlement came after the bank didn’t oppose the plaintiff’s request to certify the lawsuit as a class action. The agreement still needs to be approved by a federal judge.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875744

File: fd0b64600ae9624⋯.jpg (158.17 KB,670x955,134:191,Prince_Andrew_was_attacked….jpg)

>>18875740

2/2

Epstein started to bank with JPMorgan around 1998 and then turned to Deutsche Bank after JPMorgan closed his accounts in 2013. Both banks worked with Epstein for years after he pleaded guilty in a Florida state court in 2008 to soliciting prostitution from a minor.

New York State’s financial regulator fined Deutsche Bank $US150m in 2020 for failing to properly monitor its dealings with the convicted sex offender and other lapses. Deutsche Bank said at the time that it was a mistake to take Epstein as a client and acknowledged weaknesses in its processes, and that it had learned from its mistakes.

New York’s financial regulator found Epstein, his related entities and associates had more than 40 accounts at Deutsche Bank.

Under the terms of the settlement, dozens of eligible accusers will each automatically receive $US75,000, according to people familiar with the matter. Accusers can potentially receive a larger award if they choose to make claims against Deutsche to an administrator of the $US75m settlement, the people said. The claims could result in an accuser getting a payment of upward of $US5m, the people said.

Epstein’s accusers have pushed for decades to hold him and his associates accountable. In 2022, Prince Andrew settled a federal sex-abuse lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most prominent accusers who now lives in Perth, agreeing to make a substantial donation to her charity.

Ms Giuffre accused Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell of forcing her to have sex with the British royal when she was a teenager in the 2000s.

Maxwell was convicted of sex-trafficking in 2021 for recruiting and grooming underage girls and young women for sex acts with Epstein at his Florida estate, New York mansion and his compound in the US Virgin Islands. She is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/the-wall-street-journal/deutsche-bank-to-pay-us75m-to-settle-jeffrey-epstein-accusers-suit/news-story/60ca82b5b90e7f6a6492e0ba669f5da8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875802

File: fed2b9b9e468210⋯.jpg (2.25 MB,3833x2473,3833:2473,Some_members_and_supporter….jpg)

File: 3e4880ac7c425fd⋯.jpg (138.32 KB,836x836,1:1,Official_logo_of_the_Satan….jpg)

>>18804767

>>18804816

Pennsylvania gets its first after-school Satan Club this week. In Hellertown.

The club, for kids 5-12, promises science and community service projects, nature activities, and tons of fun. “Educatin’ with Satan,” as they say.

Rita Giordano - May 8, 2023

1/2

This week, kids in the Lehigh Valley will get to join in a different kind of after-school program. You could say it had a hell of a time getting there.

A federal judge has ordered that the Saucon Valley School District — located, ironically, in Hellertown — must allow the After School Satan Club, sponsored by The Satanic Temple, to meet on its property.

It will be the first After School Satan Club in Pennsylvania. New Jersey and Delaware currently have no After School Satan Clubs. So far, six students have signed up for the club, which begins Wednesday, and more are expected.

The preliminary injunction, granted May 1, is the latest development in a months-long, emotionally fraught controversy that saw the club with the slogan “Educatin’ with Satan” get district approval to meet only to have it rescinded.

U.S. District Court Judge John M. Gallagher ruled in favor of The Satanic Temple.

“When confronted with a challenge to free speech, the government’s first instinct must be to forward expression rather than quash it. Particularly when the content is controversial or inconvenient,” Gallagher wrote. “Nothing less is consistent with the expressed purpose of American government to secure the core, innate rights of its people.

“Here, although The Satanic Temple, Inc.’s objectors may challenge the sanctity of this controversially named organization,” he continued, “the sanctity of the First Amendment’s protections must prevail.”

Gallagher said he did not believe Saucon Valley’s claim that it withdrew the club’s approval because it failed to include a disclaimer in some of its advertisements that the district didn’t sponsor the group. Rather, he said he believed the approval was pulled based on the Satanic Temple’s “controversial viewpoint.”

Saucon Valley school superintendent Jaime Vlasaty did not respond to requests for comment. The district, near Allentown, has three schools and about 2,000 students.

Satanic Temple leaders referred comment to the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which represented them.

“We’re very pleased that the court saw the school district’s justification for canceling the contract was basically just a pretext for viewpoint discrimination because of community opposition toward the club,” said Sara Rose, the state ACLU’s deputy legal director. “And of course, we’re very glad that the club’s going to be able to meet during this school year on the same terms as other clubs have been allowed to meet.”

The club will meet this Wednesday, May 17, and May 31 at the district’s middle school, according to the agreement reached through the court case.

They will have to reapply to the district for permission to use school facilities in fall, Rose said.

It was quite an ordeal for all concerned getting this far.

When Superintendent Vlasaty notified the district community last February that the After School Satan Club had been given permission to meet at the middle school, she explained the district has allowed other religious groups to use its facilities over the years and legally could not discriminate.

Many parents reacted with anger and fear. The leader of a local Christian group vowed to hold a prayer session March 8, the day the program was supposed to open. The district got scores of concerned calls and emails.

“Then please shut down all religious after-school clubs if that’s what needs to be done to keep Satan out of that building,” read one email sent to the district.

“What’s next, the after school heroin club?” asked another.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875804

File: 0cbedc548563d28⋯.jpg (179.44 KB,1080x1080,1:1,Official_logo_of_the_Helli….jpg)

>>18875802

2/2

But things really heated up when a caller, upset about the After School Satan Club, left the district a voice mail threatening to come and “shoot everybody.” All Saucon Valley schools were closed the next day as a precaution. Shortly after, a 20-year-old North Carolina man was arrested by Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police.

Days after the threatening call, the Saucon Valley superintendent withdrew the district’s approval. Not long after that, supporters of the After School Satan Club turned to the courts.

The Satanic Temple, headquartered in Salem, Mass., is no stranger to controversy, but its leaders say they are often misunderstood.

Although The Satanic Temple is recognized by the IRS as a church and a religious — albeit nontheistic — corporation, its more than 700,000 members don’t worship Satan. For them, Satan is a symbol for the “Eternal Rebel,” according to their website. They are against “tyrannical authority” and support “individual sovereignty,” as well as empathy, compassion, and defiance.

The Satan Temple has waged public battles against the religious and GOP right on issues involving First Amendment freedoms, LGBTQ rights, and abortion access.

Their approach has been often irreverent. In keeping with their belief in bodily autonomy, one of the temple members’ latest projects is an online clinic which aims to provide abortion medication by mail. They call it the Samuel Alito’s Mom’s Satanic Abortion Clinic.

There are currently only seven active After School Satan Clubs, according to Everett. These clubs are only started in school districts that already have programs by other religious groups, like the Christian Evangelical-based Good News Club, which Saucon Valley has allowed.

The leaders say their clubs don’t try to convert children to Satanism, but focus on free inquiry, rationalism, and appreciation of the natural world. The fliers for the Saucon Valley program promised kids ages 5 to 12 science and community service projects, puzzles, games, nature activities, arts and crafts, snacks “& tons of fun.”

The Satanic Temple also operates the Hellion Academy of Independent Learning (HAIL), its alternative to Christian-based religious instruction programs. The Northern York County School District’s school board voted down a proposed After School Satan Club last year. But the district has allowed released time instruction by the Joy El Bible Adventure program. So last year HAIL started in the district as well, according to Everett.

No other districts in Pennsylvania or New Jersey currently have the HAIL project.

https://www.inquirer.com/news/satan-after-school-aclu-abortion-school-pennsylvania-federal-20230508.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875811

File: ea9c351d69bf31a⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,3679x2069,3679:2069,The_Baphomet_statue_is_see….jpg)

>>18804767

>>18804816

After School Satan Clubs gain popularity amid legal victories

LEXI LONAS - 05/09/23

1/2

After School Satan Clubs have been steadily increasing in popularity and are not likely to slow as their supporters rack up media attention and legal wins fighting for free speech.

The clubs, associated with the Satanic Temple and offered only in primary schools, began at the beginning of 2020 and quickly gained attention from parents who wanted an alternative to religious clubs, according to June Everett, campaign director of the After School Satan Club.

“That’s kind of when things started blowing up. And I anticipate that every year moving forward is going to get busier and busier,” Everett told The Hill.

Last Monday, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of the Satanic Temple and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which sued when a Northampton County school district would not allow the club to meet on its grounds.

“In a victory for free speech and religious freedom, a federal court has ruled that the Saucon Valley School District must allow the After School Satan Club to meet in district facilities,” the ACLU announced.

The Satanic Temple was founded in 2014 and says its mission is to “encourage benevolence and empathy, reject tyrannical authority.” A member should also use “practical common sense” and stand up for justice, according to its website.

There are congregations around the country, and they tell those interested that if their goals are to “sell my soul, get rich, join the Illuminati, etc.” they should “look somewhere else.”

While the clubs are controversial, mostly for their name and association with the Satanic Temple, students are not actually getting proselytized or instructions in devil worship.

“We’re definitely not interested in having children identify as satanists,” said Rose Bastet, who has been involved with the Satanic Temple for four years.

Bastet is one of the After School Satan Club volunteers at B.M. Williams Primary in Chesapeake, Va. She started the process to get the club in the school in October 2020.

The process took so long, according to Bastet, because the school was “giving us the runaround” and she believes “they were in the background looking for any way that they could prevent us from meeting.” The club was officially approved in February.

“They finally approved us, and that’s when it hit the news. And, oh, the media here just went insane,” Bastet said.

The school received a bomb threat days after the club had its first meeting. Although police said they couldn’t confirm the incident was connected to the After School Satan Club, Bastet said her name was mentioned in the threat.

“The local Christian mom groups, everything, they really stirred up a ruckus, making it seem like we were doing something nefarious,” Bastet said, adding that “they tried to intimidate me by releasing my legal name.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875812

File: 3403744ff9399e6⋯.jpg (3.14 MB,4256x2832,266:177,Virginia_Elementary_School….jpg)

2/2

Everett said the clubs are excellent alternatives to Christian after-school groups for agnostics, atheists and religious minorities, such as pagans, emphasizing that groups’ actual activities can encompass nearly anything.

Bastet said her club focuses on learning about different animals.

“One of our meetings a couple of months ago, we learned about Virginia native bats,” she said. “This last meeting, we had one of the parents in the club volunteer to bring in a bunch of bones and fossils that she and her husband have found in Virginia.”

The program could change this coming fall because Everett says they are considering teaching some of the seven core tenets of the Satanic Temple in the clubs, but that plan has not been finalized.

The seven tenets include “compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason” and that “beliefs should conform to one’s best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one’s beliefs.”

“We just came out with a book that is like the children’s version — or I should say a very sweet way to interpret — the tenets in a very understanding way that children could understand. So we might start actually using this book to talk to the kids about our seven tenets,” Everett said.

“We have a lot of big plans for next school year,” she added.

The Satanic Temple has looked into expanding into high schools but says it is difficult because students must be more actively engaged to keep the club running, as opposed to primary schools, where the groups are adult-run and easier to implement.

“That means that it has to be a student-led club. They usually have officers and they usually have to present it to the board, and they have to have a sponsoring staff member. Basically, all the things that the younger kids aren’t old enough [to do],” Everett said.

She added that a new partnership with the Secular Student Alliance should help expand the After School Satan Club’s reach.

“[Secular Student Alliance’s] specialty is really college level and high school kids. So with their partnership, we hope to use them to help us get into more high schools and colleges,” Everett said.

https://thehill.com/homenews/education/3990175-after-school-satan-clubs-gain-popularity-amid-legal-victories/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875822

File: 7e5a23f1767cb31⋯.jpg (1.29 MB,4032x3024,4:3,After_School_Satan_Club_lo….jpg)

>>18804767

>>18804816

'Big plans for next school year': After School Satan Club looks to expand to high schools

Asher Notheis - May 09, 2023

An after-school club connected to the Satanic Temple is looking to expand to high schools, and the club's campaign director said it has "big plans" for next school year.

The clubs, which are associated with the Satanic Temple, started in 2020 and caught the attention of parents seeking an alternative to religious clubs, according to June Everett, the campaign director for the club. Everett claimed the club is considering teaching some of the Satanic Temple's seven core tenets in the clubs, as well as expanding its clubs to high schools, according to the Hill.

"We have a lot of big plans for next school year," Everett said.

The problem the club faces is that unlike in primary schools, in which clubs are largely run by adults, students at high schools must be more actively engaged in the club to keep it running.

However, Everett stated that a new partnership between the club and the nonprofit group Secular Student Alliance could help expand the club's availability to other schools, including high schools. The Secular Student Alliance states on its website that it is the only national organization dedicated to atheist, humanist, and other nontheist students.

"[Secular Student Alliance's] specialty is really college level and high school kids. So with their partnership, we hope to use them to help us get into more high schools and colleges," Everett said.

Kevin Bolling, the executive director of the Secular Student Alliance, told the Washington Examiner that the nonprofit has been working with nonreligious students for over two decades. Additionally, the nonprofit "has a long history" of supporting secular students with student-run clubs at schools and campuses.

"The Secular Student Alliance and The Satanic Temple share similar values: the freedom of and from religion, state/church separation, community service to better your community, diversity and inclusion, compassion and empathy, scientific inquiry and reason, and supporting our democratic, pluralistic society," Bolling said.

"The Secular Student Alliance recently partnered to provide student-focused curriculum, free educational resources, and fun stickers and other promotional supplies for the students. While ASSC in the elementary school setting leans more toward adult-led clubs, SSA is intentionally focusing on assisting with resources to enhance the experience for students."

The After School Satan Club's possible expansion comes after the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of the Satanic Temple and the American Civil Liberties Union, which had sued the Saucon Valley School District after it refused to allow the club to meet on its grounds.

On the After School Satan Club's website, it states that the clubs are operated by the Satanic Temple and that the clubs incorporate games, projects, and thinking exercises that help children understand how the clubs know what they know about the world and the universe.

"ASSC exists to provide a safe and inclusive alternative to the religious clubs that use threats of eternal damnation to convert school children to their belief system," the website continues. "Unlike our counterparts, who publicly measure their success in young children's 'professions of faith,' the After School Satan Club program focuses on science, critical thinking, creative arts, and good works for the community."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/after-school-satan-club-looks-expand-high-schools

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875825

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18804767

>>18804816

'After School Satan Club' holds first meeting

WNEP Web Staff - May 10, 2023

HELLERTOWN, Pa. — In the Lehigh Valley, the "After School Satan Club" held its first meeting following a court battle between the Satanic Temple and the Saucon Valley School District.

The Satanic Temple was given the green light by a federal court earlier this month that it is the club's constitutional right to use Saucon Valley School District's middle school as its meeting place to gather.

The district is to abide by the agreement first approved before the superintendent rescinded it.

The ACLU says several students turned out for the first meeting and that it went well.

People practicing their First Amendment right to protest gathered ahead of the meeting of those practicing their own first amendment rights.

https://www.wnep.com/article/news/local/lehigh-county/after-school-satan-club-holds-first-meeting-saucon-valley-school-district-wnep/523-b1f8e3c0-5d7b-4ebe-badb-e701b9ff806e

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJXjLnz6NPE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875853

File: e8eb458289f967a⋯.jpg (507.67 KB,1800x1200,3:2,The_lawsuit_says_the_city_….jpg)

File: bbb818535a9036e⋯.jpg (1001.27 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Minister_of_Satan_Adam_Vav….jpg)

File: ce5737c10f9c840⋯.jpg (623.89 KB,1650x1098,275:183,Alderpeople_attend_the_las….jpg)

>>18804767

>>18804816

Satanists Sue Chicago For Not Allowing Them To Say ‘Hail Satan’ At City Council Meetings

Minster of Satan Adam Vavrick said his request has been stuck in purgatory, which "left me with no choice but to file suit."

Mack Liederman - May 18, 2023

1/2

CHICAGO — Local Satanists are raising hell with a new lawsuit alleging the city is barring them from saying “Hail Satan” at City Council meetings.

The lawsuit — filed this month by the Satanic Temple — says the city violated the religious group’s First Amendment rights by “excluding disfavored minority faiths” from giving an invocation at the start of City Council meetings.

During the invocations, religious leaders remind lawmakers to “reflect upon shared ideals and common ends before they embark on the fractious business of governing,” according to the lawsuit.

More than 50 local religious groups have given invocations in front of City Council since The Satanic Temple Illinois first inquired about giving one in December 2019, said Minister of Satan Adam Vavrick, citing publicly available meeting minutes.

Vavrick said public officials repeatedly ignored his followup requests to give an invocation. Emails he shared with Block Club show officials telling Vavrick they were “review[ing] the information provided” in January 2020 and still “working on this request” in March 2022.

“Thank you so much for your interest,” a clerk’s office official wrote in an email to Vavrick in August 2021. “We will be in touch … .”

Vavrick said his request has been stuck in purgatory, which “left me with no choice but to file suit.”

“I think the choice to ignore me was the hope I’d just go away,” Vavrick said. “If we can just ignore a Satanist’s request purely because they’re a Satanist, then we never believed in equal access in the first place.”

A Mayor’s Office spokesperson said the city does not comment on pending litigation. Ald. Daniel La Spata (1st), who Vavrick said he spoke to about the issue and who is copied on emails to city officials, also said he could not comment on pending litigation.

In an email obtained by Block Club, La Spata wrote to a city official, saying the requests were “not at my behest.”

“Once I learned that he wanted to end his convocation with ‘Hail Satan’ it ceased being something I could support,” La Spata wrote in the email. “For all of my desire to be inclusive, that would be a betrayal of my personal faith.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18875856

File: 4197d8c72f6051a⋯.jpg (143.52 KB,852x316,213:79,Q_4942.jpg)

File: 96d4a27622e40aa⋯.jpg (397.16 KB,852x1150,426:575,Q_3967.jpg)

File: 879a1134c1c79a7⋯.jpg (86.99 KB,932x932,1:1,Q_3967.jpg)

>>18875853

2/2

The Satanic Temple is a federally recognized religion with congregations across the United States and more than 14,000 members in Illinois - and it should be allowed to solemnize City Council just like any other religion, Vavrick said.

Members do not worship Satan or any higher - or lower - power, but they reclaim the symbolism of Satan as a “rejection of arbitrary authority” imposed on people with identities marginalized by other cultures and religions, Vavrick said.

“This religion is an affirmation that you cannot touch me, because I’m happy with who I am,” Vavrick said. “To embrace Satan is to say, ‘I’m the other, and I’m f-cking proud of it.'”

Vavrick is co-congregation head of The Satanic Temple Illinois, which has about 100 active members who meet once a month and have organized highway cleanups and drives for menstrual products, he said. The group does not proselytize, Vavrick said.

The benign nature of the group has not stopped public officials across the country from imposing roadblocks to invocation requests, with similar lawsuits moving forward in Boston and Scottsdale, Arizona. An invocation given by The Satanic Temple in Alaska in 2019 led to a walkout of some officials, while another in San Marcos, Texas, was given Tuesday.

The Satanic Temple Illinois previously were able to add a holiday display in the Illinois State House rotunda, next to a nativity scene and a menorah, in a show of religious pluralism, according to the Tribune.

Vavrick said he offered to send Chicago officials the full script of his invocation ahead of time.

The invocation:

“Let us stand now, unbowed and unfettered by arcane doctrines born of fearful minds in darkened times. Let us embrace the Luciferian impulse to eat of the tree of knowledge, and dissipate our blissful and comforting delusions of old. Let us demand that individuals be judged for their concrete actions and not their fealty to arbitrary social norms and illusionary categorizations. Let us reason our solutions with agnosticism in all things, holding fast only to that which is demonstrably true. Let us stand firm against any and all arbitrary authority that threatens the personal sovereignty of one or all. That which will not bend must break. And that which can be destroyed by truth, should never be spared its demise. It is done.

“Hail Satan.”

https://blockclubchicago.org/2023/05/18/satanists-sue-chicago-for-not-allowing-them-to-say-hail-satan-at-city-council-meetings/

Q Post #4942

Oct 30 2020 10:38:45 (EST)

https://time.com/collection/great-reset/

This is not about R v D.

This is about preserving our way of life.

If America falls, the World falls.

Patriots on guard.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4942

Q Post #3967

Apr 15 2020 13:06:42

These people are pure evil.

This is not about politics.

You are ready.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3967

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876298

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18708667

‘Verdict first, trial later’: rule of law under threat, says Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer Steven Whybrow SC

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - MAY 20, 2023

1/2

The presumption of innocence and the right to due process have been dangerously warped by the #MeToo movement, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer Steven Whybrow SC has claimed, in his first interview since Mr Lehrmann went on trial over Brittany Higgins’ rape ­allegations.

“This was ‘Alice in Wonderland’. Sentence first or verdict first, trial later,” Mr Whybrow says of the pre-trial publicity around the case.

“There was so much material out there that was just simply ‘he’s guilty’ and we’ve just got to go through this process of a trial. I saw that as a significant undermining of the rule of law and the ­presumption of innocence and due process.

“We all know this happens all the time: this guy’s been accused of this, so therefore it happened. And along the way, anybody who tried to argue the contrary narrative was treated as somehow morally deficient.”

Mr Whybrow said that if there was to be a debate about the presumption of innocence or whether an accused person should not have a right to silence, “those things should actually happen in an ­informed way publicly, rather than this insidious suggestion that ‘that’s what the system is’”.

“But it’s not good. It’s not right,” he added.

Mr Whybrow’s comments came as Mr Lehrmann revealed for the first time that when he tried to get legal assistance for his ­defence, Legal Aid ACT insisted it would not allow Ms Higgins to be challenged in court as a liar, but simply “perhaps mistaken about versions of events”.

Mr Lehrmann told The Weekend Australian he sacked Legal Aid ACT after the agency demanded he adopt a conciliatory defence strategy that was ­completely at odds with his account of the events that occurred in senator Linda Reynolds’ ministerial office in the early hours of March 23, 2019.

Mr Lehrmann said a solicitor at the agency told him “it was up to the CEO of Legal Aid in terms of the broader tactics of the case and he was going to say that she’s not a liar but was mistaken about aspects of the version of events”.

Mr Lehrmann said the agency also rejected Mr Whybrow as “too aggressive” to take on the case.

The solicitor told him the agency would not fund Mr Whybrow as his counsel in the trial because “Legal Aid didn’t like the way Mr Whybrow practices or the way he operates”.

Mr Whybrow ultimately took on the case pro bono after Mr Lehrmann refused to accept the Legal Aid conditions.

A spokesperson for Legal Aid ACT declined to comment.

“Bruce was just horrified that they’re not even going to run his defence, which was: she’s lying, she made it up, this did not happen – and to just say, ‘oh no, you misunderstood, you were mistaken’,” Mr Whybrow said. “So he became very distressed.”

The former Crown prosecutor pursued a forceful approach at the trial, describing Ms Higgins as “unreliable” and someone “who says things to suit her”.

Mr Whybrow told jurors she had lied about seeing a doctor to “make it more believable” she had allegedly been sexually assaulted.

He outlined a number of instances when Ms Higgins was forced to concede she had given wrong evidence, including the length of time a white dress was kept in a plastic bag under her bed and a three-hour panic attack on a day she later conceded she had been having a valedictory lunch for former politician Steven Ciobo.

“The person bringing the allegation is prepared to just say anything,” Mr Whybrow told jurors.

The jury had been deliberating for five days, unable to agree on a verdict, when the trial was abruptly aborted after one of the jurors brought research material into the room.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876304

File: b6638af9e6d0ecc⋯.jpg (114.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_s_lawyer_St….jpg)

File: 623b42960a4f867⋯.jpg (104.66 KB,768x1024,3:4,Bruce_Lehrmann.jpg)

File: 78009f7072f39cc⋯.jpg (115.64 KB,768x1024,3:4,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

>>18876298

2/2

Mr Whybrow told The Weekend Australian he had been concerned that, because of the pre-trial publicity, the defence would struggle to get 12 unbiased, unaffected jurors.

“In some respects, that was borne out by the number of people in the jury pool who quite properly, when the chief justice asked that anyone who thought they might have some pre-existing bias, either for or against the complainant or the accused, or had attended the March4Justice, or subscribed to particular views about sexual assault, or even had had own experiences, that meant that they could not bring a fair mind to the role of a juror to come forward.

“And a lot of people did, but we were never able to be sure that some of the people who didn’t come forward may have had strongly held views and were going to not come forward because they wanted to ensure justice – as they perceived it – would be done.”

Mr Whybrow expressed strong concerns over the role of ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates, who often accompanied Ms Higgins to court.

“The problem in this case – and it’s not just my perception, it’s one that I know a lot of people have shared – is that by walking next to Ms Higgins into court every day as the statutory office holder of the position of the Victims of Crime Commissioner – and that would be videoed every morning, it would be in the papers and the news that night – it carried with it a less-than-subtle and a less-than-subconscious inference that Ms Higgins was in fact a victim.

“It was about as subtle as if Ms Yates had walked in wearing a T-shirt, saying ‘Bruce is guilty’, Mr Whybrow said.

“This case has demonstrated, in my view, an insidious and underappreciated issue, which is this conflict and this tension and this slow bracket creep between the presumption of innocence on the one hand, and ‘believe all women’ – or in a sexual assault case, ‘people don’t make anything up’ – that is undermining a presumption of innocence.”

Ms Yates declined to comment on Friday, and a spokeswoman for the ACT Human Rights Commission pointed to a previous statement in which it welcomed the set-up of the Sofronoff inquiry.

Mr Whybrow said he took on the case pro bono after Legal Aid ACT refused to hire him because “I wanted to be part of an attempt to at least give this man a fair trial in the face of what I and many other people had considered was such adverse publicity that he could never actually get a fair trial”.

Mr Lehrmann originally approached Legal Aid for help after his first lawyer, John Korn, was forced to withdraw for medical reasons.

Legal Aid also refused to fund the solicitor Mr Korn had recommended, Kamy Saeedi, saying it would assign an in-house lawyer.

Mr Lehrmann said he was stunned that the agency was demanding he accept a defence strategy that contradicted his account of what occurred in Parliament House after a night out drinking with colleagues in Canberra. Mr Lehrmann has consistently maintained, including in his statement to police, that there was no sexual contact of any kind with Ms Higgins and that after they got to Senator Reynolds’ suite, he went left and Ms Higgins turned right, and he didn’t see her again.

“It was basically Kamy who said to me, right, just fire them – he helped me write a letter firing them,” Mr Lehrmann told The Weekend Australian.

Mr Saeedi agreed to take on the case pro bono.

“This is a winnable case if we just do it how we need to, not how the Legal Aid wants to do it,” Mr Lehrmann recalls his new lawyer saying.

“He was concerned that I’m being led up the garden path and that they’ve got no idea, because they’re all so woke in Canberra,” Mr Lehrmann said.

“So he just said, I’m just going to do it pro bono now, let’s not worry about the money.”

Mr Whybrow also then agreed to act for Mr Lehrmann pro bono.

“It was, you know, we’ll keep an account going and you will likely never pay. We know that if you’re in jail we’re never going to get paid,” Mr Whybrow said. “And even if you’re acquitted, unless you win Lotto, we’re never going to get paid. But we will act for you.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/verdict-first-trial-later-rule-of-law-under-threat-says-bruce-lehrmanns-lawyer-steven-whybrow-sc/news-story/bc65719c7e4772945e31aa9810200dbb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU5nUziv0Hw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876460

File: 9261e1bdb80dd12⋯.mp4 (15.97 MB,640x360,16:9,Steven_Whybrow_SC_on_the_t….mp4)

>>18708667

>>18876298

Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech about Brittany Higgins ‘kept Bruce Lehrmann out of jail’, says lawyer Steven Whybrow

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - MAY 20, 2023

1/5

“Frankly, if it wasn’t for Lisa Wilkinson’s speech at the Logies, Bruce would probably be in jail. Thank God for that speech.”

It’s Wednesday afternoon. There is a three-day pause in the public hearings at the Board of Inquiry into the handling by the police, the Director of Public Prosecutions and others of the investigation, prosecution and trial of Bruce Lehrmann.

Revelations from the previous seven days of public hearings have been explosive. Legal eagles, in particular, have struggled to turn off the live-stream proceedings.

Steven Whybrow SC, Lehrmann’s defence barrister, is talking to The Weekend Australian in his first lengthy interview about the case and the inquiry so far.

Just as we catch our breath, Whybrow adds this staggering comment about the Logies.

Many people were aghast at Wilkinson’s speech in mid-June 2022. Her public praise of Brittany Higgins, who she had interviewed on The Project, and the implied celebration of the truth of her rape complaint against Lehrmann, within days of the commencement of the trial, would up-end the court process.

Taking a break after two days in the witness box this week, Whybrow explains that he saw the Logies speech differently.

“If Ms Wilkinson had not said the things she said at the Logies, and the trial judge had not ­adjourned the trial for three months, I genuinely believe Bruce would have been convicted,” Whybrow says.

The barrister had agreed to lead Lehrmann’s legal team in early June 2022, with the trial due to start barely three weeks later in the ACT Supreme Court.

“What happened at the Logies, and what was said, is the matter of some contention and discussion at the inquiry. So I won’t say anything about what was said, but it’s a matter of public record that as a result of what was said … we made an application for a temporary stay that it wasn’t fair, on top of everything else, for Bruce to have to face a jury a week after.”

Whybrow points to the public statements during and after the Logies, “again, basically saying Ms Higgins is a true victim of a true crime and the trial is just a formality”. “We needed a stay in order to put some distance from that speech in the minds of any potential jurors.”

Chief Justice Lucy McCallum agreed, as she said through “gritted teeth”, and delayed the trial for three months.

Whybrow explains the delay was critical to the defence: “If it wasn’t for Ms Wilkinson’s speech, we would have gone into that trial without so much material that we subsequently came into possession of, either through chasing up disclosure or chasing up subpoenas … integral to properly understanding and challenging the complainant’s allegations.

“Most of the stuff we got, including the Moller Report, and the transcripts of six hours of Brittany Higgins being interviewed on The Project, all of that stuff we got in September. The trial was supposed to be over by the end of July, right. We would have gone into this (trial) with about 20 per cent of the stuff we needed.”

One of the documents the defence team needed was the Moller Report, formally labelled the Investigative Review document.

Leading up to the new trial on October 4, the DPP continued to withhold the Moller Report, claiming it was subject to legal professional privilege. The DPP, Shane Drumgold, told the board of inquiry last week he didn’t want the police report in the hands of the defence because it would be “crushing” to Higgins.

The 64-page document was finally handed over to Lehrmann’s team – Whybrow, co-counsel Katrina Musgrove, Ben Jullienne and solicitor Rachel Fisher from Kamy Saeedi Law – under subpoena from the police, who agreed the defence should have it.

It included pages of discrepancies police discovered during their investigation, including inconsistencies in Higgins’ statements to police. Whybrow says it was crucial to the defence his team was building. The newly appointed silk says it was a “big call” for solicitor Kamy Saeedi to approach him to represent Lehrmann.

“I wasn’t a senior counsel. And you know, even a middling SC or even a terrible SC is going to be perceived by the public and the jury as more important and more competent than the world’s best non-senior counsel.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876476

File: 6ebd2a31efc1301⋯.mp4 (15.94 MB,640x360,16:9,Steven_Whybrow_SC_on_the_t….mp4)

>>18876460

2/5

Alice in Wonderland

Perceptions be damned. Whybrow’s sharp mind and brave soul kicked in when he saw what Lehrmann was facing.

“The Project went to air in February 2021, and unless you’re living under a very heavy rock, or had been stuck overseas during the pandemic – and even then you would not have failed to have been aware of this allegation, or this – from the media’s perspective – story,” he says.

“What made it a very important matter for us to act for Bruce was, without having met him, without knowing anything about the case, as at the time we were asked to act for him, certainly my perception, was that this was ‘Alice in Wonderland’. Sentence first or verdict first, trial later.

“There was so much material out there that was just simply ‘he’s guilty’ and we’ve just got to go through this process of a trial. I saw that as a significant undermining of the rule of law and the presumption of innocence and due process, and I wanted to be part of an attempt to at least give this man a fair trial in the face of what I and many other people had considered was such adverse publicity that he could never actually get a fair trial.

“We did this case in the expectation that we would never see any money because Bruce didn’t have any money. He was out of a job. He hadn’t worked in 18 months.”

Why sub judice matters

Sub judice matters to our system of justice, Whybrow says. That’s why it’s problematic when a complainant chooses to go to the media first, police second.

Sub judice is Latin legal shorthand for laws that prevent public comments about proceedings that have the potential to interfere with the administration of justice and, therefore, a fair trial.

“Ms Higgins was asked by the police to not do media until she’d spoken to the police,” Whybrow says. “Now, if she’d listened to the police, if they had taken a statement from her and then gone and arrested Bruce, The Project wouldn’t have been able to play their interview because it would’ve been a breach of sub judice rules about outstanding criminal charges. But by doing it this way, he was out there, he was already the man who raped Brittany Higgins.”

‘Slow bracket creep’

Whybrow says the Lehrmann case demonstrates “an insidious and under-appreciated issue, which is this conflict and this tension and this slow bracket creep between the presumption of innocence on the one hand, and ‘believe all women’, or in a sexual assault people don’t make anything up, and to the undermining of a presumption of innocence”.

“Ms Higgins was standing there at Parliament House the day that the police were expecting her to come and talk to them about these allegations. She was at the March for Justice telling the crowd that she was raped in that place, that people have been hiding behind throwaway phrases like due process and the presumption of innocence.

“You know, if I write a book, it’s going to be called Throwaway Phrases. Because that’s what this case was about, the presumption of innocence and due process and how it was warped by the #MeToo movement.

“And I don’t say that in a way to denigrate or downplay the actual subject matter. There is a terrible amount of abuse of power, sexual misconduct, sexual offending, and it’s underreported. It is disproportionately by men against women. We all know that.

“(But) due process and the presumption of innocence are not throwaway phrases. They are the cornerstones of the rule of law.”

Whybrow says if we want to have a debate about what the presumption should be, whether there should be an onus of proof, whether an accused person should not have a right to silence, “those things should actually happen in an informed way publicly, rather than this insidious suggestion that that’s what the system is”.

“But it’s not good. It’s not right. And let’s really just not take any notice of it,” he says.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876487

File: 9c739f566046ba1⋯.mp4 (15.81 MB,640x360,16:9,Steven_Whybrow_SC_on_the_t….mp4)

>>18876476

3/5

Biggest case

Whybrow tells me he won’t say a bad word against writer Peter FitzSimons, who reportedly helped Higgins with her book deal. “Cause, you know, if I want to write a book, he’s obviously the person to go to.”

And why not a book? Whybrow was at the centre of a case Board of Inquiry chairman Walter Sofronoff KC last week described as the biggest case since Lindy Chamberlain. Importantly, this controversial rape trial brings into stark relief the clashing forces of the #MeToo movement and principles that underpin our criminal justice system.

As a criminal law barrister for three decades, Whybrow has seen it from both sides. His first interview after completing law was with the up and coming Lucy McCallum for a job at the ACT DPP. He worked as a Crown prosecutor for more than a decade before going to the private Bar as a defence barrister.

On Bruce Lehrmann

He talks about Lehrmann with warmth and concern. “Part of my role has been not only to lead Bruce’s defence, but to be his psychological support too. I would talk to Bruce multiple times a day,” he says.

“I can’t imagine what it’s like to sit there and you’ve got a good job and you’ve got a girlfriend and you’re getting on with your life and you’re in your mid-20s, and then all of a sudden out of the blue you’re accused of something that happened two years ago that you deny.”

It was alleged to have happened in Parliament House. It became a became a national political scandal, with all the viciousness that flows when a rape allegation is politicised, this time overlaid with the #MeToo movement.

Boy from Wagga Wagga

The 56-year-old barrister doesn’t take himself too seriously but he takes his cases and his clients very seriously, and the rule of law equally so.

He’s the working-class, public school-educated kid from Wagga Wagga whose dad, Milton “Killer” Whybrow, played A-grade rugby league from the age of 14 or 15. His dad died a few years ago, battered and bashed up from playing hooker against adult men “back when the unlimited tackle rule applied, and there were no videos”.

Whybrow’s mum, Nancye, met his dad when she worked for the legendary Clive Churchill at the Wagga Wagga Leagues Club. She was 20 when Whybrow, the eldest of three kids, was born. Fast-forward from Wagga Wagga to Canberra. When Whybrow was three years into his law degree, his stay-at-home mum started law too. Later, he would move his mum’s admission in court.

He may don robes by day, but still he seems a chip off the old block, playing the legal equivalent of an A-grade hooker. In this case, what happened in the scrums, both in and out of court, was caught on every camera imaginable, making headlines just about every week, sometimes every day.

Board of Inquiry

The terms of reference for the public Board of Inquiry concern the behaviour of the AFP, the DPP and the Victims of Crime Commissioner, Heidi Yates, who accompanied Higgins into court, in front of cameras, during the trial.

Whybrow’s allegations against the DPP are grave. In his 75-page statement, and in the witness box last week, he laid out why he thinks the DPP lost sight of his role as minister of justice and became Higgins’ advocate instead.

Documents were held back by the DPP to protect Higgins. At the trial, Drumgold told the jury, despite no evidence, that there was a conservative political conspiracy to hinder the rape investigation. He didn’t hand over a potentially important email during the trial from Fiona Brown, who Whybrow describes as the most important witness in the trial, after Higgins. On it goes. Six months after the DPP’s decision not to retry Lehrmann, Whybrow’s observations about the case are serious; his observations about the rule of law are even graver.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876498

File: af9917ce5d76ffd⋯.jpg (150.03 KB,1280x720,16:9,Stephen_Whybrow_has_spoken….jpg)

File: 198836128fa5a85⋯.jpg (88.08 KB,768x1024,3:4,Television_personality_Lis….jpg)

>>18876487

4/5

‘Holy shit’ moments

He says there were too many ‘holy shit’ moments to pin any one down as the worst.

“There’s just too many, like there was so much material and we would go ‘Oh my God’ 15 times a day.”

None more so than when the defence team finally received the Moller Report. “I see that report, which is basically a more sophisticated and extended version of what I was suggesting from what I could see already. So, it gives you some comfort that you’re on the right track, that you’re not looking at it from a jaundiced position,” he says.

“We went, ‘Wow. Yep. They’ve (AFP) all seen the same things’. I can’t think of too many cases where more inconsistencies had been demonstrated and shown you between a complainant saying A, B, C, D, E, and then evidence coming out objectively to say, not A, not B, not C, not D, not E.”

#MeToo metastasises

Whybrow was deeply concerned by Higgins’ post-mistrial comments. He describes Higgins’ statement, where she said Lehrmann didn’t have to get into the witness box, as “an inflammatory call to arms to say he should not have a presumption of innocence and a right to silence”.

Whereas many barristers are verbose, Whybrow cuts through layers of complex issues with ease.

“#MeToo, has in many respects, metastasised into, for a lot of people, #BelieveAllWomen,” he says, pointing to the Lehrmann case as “a clear example of what I feel has been a slow creep, undermining the presumption of innocence and the rule of law in Australia for some time”.

“We had a sort of photogenic complainant, an articulate young woman making an allegation not only that she was sexually assaulted, but she was sexually assaulted in a minister’s office at Parliament House,” he says. Whybrow is nothing but supportive of what he says is a greater and overdue recognition of the harm and trauma done by what is undoubtedly under-reported and understated levels of sexual and domestic violence in this country.

But, he says, “in this case, and certainly before this case, there had been what I would call some sort of bracket creep against the presumption of innocence”. “We’re dealing with an allegation that somebody is entitled to test, and that comes into conflict with this human desire and recognition that people who have sustained trauma need to be dealt with in an empathetic and careful way.”

Whybrow lauds legal protections put in place to right the wrongs of the past. He points to a few: complainants do not have to walk into court through the public entrance. They do not have to give evidence in the court, but rather can do so from a remote location. They do not have to see the person they’re making the allegations against. But he is concerned the pendulum has started to swing past the centre “towards weighing against a fair trial. And if you push back, then you are a rape apologist or you are a misogynist or you don’t believe that these sorts of offences occur”. “Believe all complainants is a short way of saying presumed guilt.”

He says when you are talking about an individual prosecution, it doesn’t matter if 90 per cent of complainants are telling the truth. “That has no basis whatsoever as to whether or not this individual one is.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876504

File: 78009f7072f39cc⋯.jpg (115.64 KB,768x1024,3:4,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

File: 9cf8f38d900ce16⋯.jpg (141.17 KB,768x1023,256:341,ACT_Victims_of_Crime_Commi….jpg)

>>18876498

5/5

Harder for women?

Whybrow says he believes victims of sexual assault might be dissuaded from coming forward if they think the Higgins case is somehow representative of what they would have to go through. “It’s not fair and it’s not accurate.

“Ms Higgins voluntarily decided to publicise that she was a complainant. She voluntarily chose to walk into the court every day past the media. She was provided the option to give evidence from a remote room, so she didn’t have to be in the same room as all the media and Mr Lehrmann and all of that sort of stuff. She chose to not avail herself of all the protections that are there for all complainants in sexual assault matters.

“It’s problematic to compare the drama and the media and the surface of that trial with what any other person would go through.”

‘Bruce is guilty’ T-shirt

Whybrow told The Weekend Australian he doesn’t have “any beef with the Victims of Crime Commissioner, or that office, or the important work that they do in supporting people who are asserting that they are victims of crime”.

“The problem in this case – and it’s not just my perception, it’s one that I know a lot of people have shared – is that by walking next to Higgins into court every day as the statutory office holder of the position of the Victims of Crime Commissioner – and that would be videoed every morning, it would be in the papers and the news that night – it carried with it a less-than-subtle and a less-than-subconscious inference that Ms Higgins was in fact a victim.

“It was about as subtle as if Ms Yates had walked in wearing a T-shirt, saying ‘Bruce is guilty’.”

‘Google cab rank rule’

On the day Whybrow delivered his opening address, an anonymous email arrived accusing the barrister of being a “rape apologist” and an “immoral vampire who profits off deceit and misery”.

The author, who also threatened Whybrow’s family, is not alone in misunderstanding how the lawyer came to represent Lehrmann.

The cab rank rule is one of the finest traditions of the Bar. It means a barrister is honour-bound to accept a brief if they are available and skilled in the area of the brief. It means all defendants, no matter the crime of which they are accused, no matter how unpopular they are, are entitled to, and can, in reality, obtain defence counsel. Not for nothing Whybrow’s Twitter profile says “Google cab rank rule if confused”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/lisa-wilkinsons-logies-speech-kept-bruce-lehrmann-out-of-jail-says-lawyer-steven-whybrow/news-story/8873357a8bc1234dac8ead86a9a2ecc7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876521

File: fabbac6dd96c9d9⋯.jpg (2.16 MB,5210x3721,5210:3721,The_bilateral_was_the_sixt….jpg)

>>18860427

At G7 Summit, Biden apologises to Albanese for scrapping Sydney Quad meeting

Eryk Bagshaw - May 20, 2023

1/2

Hiroshima: US President Joe Biden will ask Congress to empower Australian manufacturers as a domestic source for arms manufacturing, binding the two countries’ defence production together as they confront the growing military might of China.

After meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the G7 in Hiroshima on Saturday, Biden said he would ask Congress to list Australia under Title III of the Defence Production Act, clearing the way for Australian companies to be given the same treatment as their US counterparts as part of the $368 billion AUKUS nuclear submarine deal.

“Doing so would streamline technological and industrial base collaboration, accelerate and strengthen AUKUS implementation,” the president said.

Albanese said he had pushed for the critical designation since the two leaders met in San Diego in March and the president’s support would mean Australia would become a domestic source under the Defence Production Act.

Biden said he would also deploy new United States Coast Guard vessels in the Pacific in early 2024 as China ramps up its patrols and territorial claims in the region.

The G7 leaders said they remained “seriously concerned about the situation in the East and South China Seas” and for the first time described peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait “as indispensable to the security and prosperity in the international community”.

The declaration escalated the G7’s leaders’ criticism of China at the same time as its members - the US, UK, Germany, Italy, France, Canada and Japan, claimed their “policy approaches are not designed to harm China nor do we seek to thwart China’s economic progress and development”.

The joint leaders’ statement, issued as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Hiroshima on Sunday, heaped pressure on Beijing to use its diplomatic weight to end the war in Ukraine.

“We call on China to press Russia to stop its military aggression, and immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw its troops from Ukraine,” the G7 said.

China’s Foreign Ministry defended Beijing’s relationship with Moscow.

“China always opposes unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction that have no basis in international law or mandate from the Security Council,” spokesman Wang Wenbin said on Friday.

“China has always carried out normal economic and trade cooperation with Russia and other countries on the basis of equality and mutual benefit.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876524

File: b1784948470f241⋯.jpg (1.35 MB,5232x3488,3:2,Anthony_Albanese_says_he_u….jpg)

>>18876521

2/2

The meeting between Albanese and Biden followed Washington’s offer to train Ukrainian pilots on American-made F-16 fighter jets as Kyiv prepares to launch a new offensive against Russian forces.

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said on Saturday that the US will work with allies “to determine when planes will be delivered, who will be delivering them and how many”.

The visit from the Ukrainian leader is the highest-profile overseas trip taken by Zelensky since the start of the war last year.

Russia launched its ninth wave of missile strikes at the Ukrainian capital on Saturday.

“Fifteen months of Russia’s aggression has cost thousands of lives, inflicted immense suffering on the people of Ukraine, and imperilled access to food and energy for many of the world’s most vulnerable people,” the G7 leaders said in a joint statement after announcing fresh economic restrictions and arms commitments for Kyiv.

“Our support for Ukraine will not waver.”

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has used the war in Ukraine to sharpen the focus of the world’s leaders on the potential for future conflict in the Taiwan Strait.

“Any unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force is unacceptable anywhere in the world,” said Kishida.

Kishida, Biden, Albanese and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi were due to travel to Australia for a Quad meeting in Sydney after the G7 next week, but the summit was cancelled due to the US debt crisis. The rescheduled Quad meeting was due to take place in Hiroshima late on Saturday night.

Biden apologised to Albanese for cancelling his trip to Australia and said negotiations with Republicans were “in their closing stages”. He said he was confident the US “will be able to avoid a default” as Washington teeters on the edge of an economic cliff that could have major consequences for the global economy if the deadline of June 1 is not met.

“I’m sorry I’m not taking a plane to Australia,” said Biden as the pair signed a climate and critical minerals’ pact.“All politics is local, but friendship is permanent.”

Albanese said he “would have done exactly the same thing”.

The bilateral was the sixth meeting between the leaders since Albanese became prime minister in May last year.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/at-g7-summit-biden-apologises-to-albanese-for-scrapping-sydney-quad-meeting-20230520-p5d9wj.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876559

File: 371a782552f5728⋯.mp4 (15.9 MB,640x360,16:9,Top_American_intelligence_….mp4)

‘Illegal, malign’: China’s state-sponsored crime stretches across Pacific

Nick McKenzie and Amelia Ballinger - May 20, 2023

1/2

Australia’s key law enforcement partners have launched a blistering attack on the Chinese government, saying the state actor poses the gravest threat to the security of Australia and its allies, while alleging that Beijing is also green-lighting organised crime bosses as agents of influence in Pacific Island nations.

The FBI has described US and Australian efforts to ramp up the Western law enforcement presence in the Pacific, marked most recently by the Albanese government’s $317 million “Pacific expansion” funding package for the AFP, as aimed in part at countering China’s own efforts in the Indo-Pacific.

In exclusive interviews with this masthead and 60 Minutes, police chiefs from the secretive Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group, an intelligence-sharing alliance between Australia, the US, Britain, Canada and New Zealand, described how their investigations had linked the Chinese government to a systemic campaign of covert interference and intimidation in other nations.

The damning critique of Beijing by Australia’s key police allies came as Australian Federal Police commissioner Reece Kershaw refused to be drawn on the Chinese government’s activities — or even name China — in an interview on the sidelines of the annual meeting of the Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group in Melbourne.

Kershaw’s reluctance to pick a public fight with Beijing is part of a delicate diplomatic juggling act aimed at maintaining police-to-police relations with Chinese authorities to combat drug trafficking while countering alleged foreign interference by the Chinese Communist Party.

Complicating matters, the government is working to salvage relations with Australia’s biggest trading partner after Beijing triggered $20 billion worth of trade strikes on Australian goods during pandemic-era hostilities. Arriving in Hiroshima, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed he had been formally invited to Beijing, but said he would not visit until all trade barriers had been lifted.

FBI deputy director Paul Abbate said there was “no doubt” China was the country that presented the biggest challenge to democracy in Australia and its Five Eyes partners. He described “the scope and the scale of the illegal and malign activities that the Chinese Communist Party is carrying out” as unprecedented.

He accused Beijing of involvement in the “sweeping theft of intellectual property, research and development from each of our Five Eye countries” along with industrial-scale cyber hacking and the “transnational repression” of CCP critics abroad, including “physical threats”.

China “poses a grave danger to each of our countries, our way of life, our democracies and the freedoms that we value so much”, Abbate said.

Abbate also said the FBI had “no doubt” the Chinese state was using organised crime groups as agents of influence in Pacific Island nations.

“It’s multi-faceted. They’re [the Chinese government] leveraging these [criminal] groups to undermine, again, our democracy. That’s one facet of it. They’re reaping profits from it at the same time. And then they’re spreading malign influence.”

He described how the FBI had tracked “money flows … from the organised criminal groups” in the Pacific to “individuals within [the Chinese] government”.

Security sources separately said Five Eyes intelligence had identified triad bosses who were working to corrupt powerful officials from Pacific nations through CCP United Front organisations, whose aim is to influence foreign elites such as politicians and business people.

China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, declined a request to be interviewed, but Beijing has previously dismissed accusations it is involved in unlawful conduct as baseless.

Canada’s police commissioner, Mike Duheme, also singled out Beijing for the level of its interference in crime, intelligence and political circles. Duheme said that in Canada, where Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in March ordered a probe into allegations of Chinese interference in the 2019 and 2021 elections, there were “ties from organised crime all the way up to the Chinese state”.

Britain’s National Crime Agency director-general Graeme Biggar described “a massive effort from the Chinese state” to engage in cyber espionage. Biggar said while Russian hackers were responsible for much of the world’s “cyber criminality”, Beijing was engaged in a “really significant” campaign “of pure espionage on a normal state level and then industrial espionage to steal intellectual property”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876570

File: cc73b09468466bb⋯.jpg (3.74 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Five_Eyes_Law_Enforcement_….jpg)

>>18876559

2/2

Britain’s chief counter-terror officer, assistant commissioner Matt Jukes, detailed Beijing’s “concerted effort to influence political figures, intimidate diaspora communities and … forcibly repatriate people who are opponents or to intimidate people whose families are in opposition to the Chinese Communist Party”.

The US, Canada and Britain have all moved against secret Chinese police stations in their countries in recent weeks. Duheme, Abbate and Jukes said they were used by Beijing to track and intimidate dissidents.

Australia’s first two, and only, foreign interference prosecutions involve allegations that Chinese intelligence operatives were directing third parties to carry out clandestine activities on behalf of Beijing in Australia.

But Kershaw has also recently renewed partnerships with Beijing’s security services that have led to multi-tonne drug seizures.

Lowy Institute China scholar Richard McGregor said Kershaw’s “caution in public [on China] is not surprising, as he has always been open about what he believes to be the value of Chinese co-operation in cracking down on the narcotics trade”.

But McGregor said it was certain “that if the FBI has tracked connections between Chinese organised crime and Chinese government-linked bodies in the Pacific, then not only would Australia know about it. We would have been instrumental in uncovering the information”.

Pressed on why he refused to discuss Beijing’s hostile activities in his interview with this masthead, Kershaw cited the AFP’s success in “operationalising intelligence” provided by China’s Ministry of Public Security and revealed he’d recently met with law enforcement leaders and agreed to continue to “exchange intelligence and … respect each other’s sovereignty”.

Abbate accused Beijing of abetting the fentanyl crisis in the US. He said “the Chinese government plays a huge role and serves as a driver” of America’s opioid addiction epidemic by failing to curb the mass export of fentanyl from China.

Officials who briefed this masthead said Chinese authorities shared information with Australia only when it suited Beijing’s interests.

Research fellow from the US think tank the Brookings Institution, Vanda Felbab-Brown, recently told the US Congress: “While China takes counter-narcotics diplomacy in South-East Asia and the Pacific very seriously, its operational law enforcement co-operation tends to be highly selective, self-serving, limited and subordinate to its geopolitical interests.”

Battle for influence

Kershaw would also not be drawn on whether the AFP’s recent Pacific expansion funding in the budget was about containing Chinese influence.

“I think part of it is countering any organised crime group that’s actually eroding away democracy and the economies of the Pacific,” he told this masthead and 60 Minutes.

He made the comments after delivering a speech to the FELEG in which he attacked unnamed “state actors” who “are using and profiting from organised crime”.

Chinese security services have made significant inroads in Pacific Island nations, including Solomon Islands and, until the recent change of government, Fiji. The FBI and Homeland Security Investigations, the US agency responsible for combating transnational organised crime, both said Beijing was working with organised criminals in the Pacific to advance its geopolitical aims.

In late 2020, the US government sanctioned notorious triad boss Wan “Broken Tooth” Kuok Koi, alleging he was engaging in organised crime in South-East Asia and the tiny Pacific Island of Palau while maintaining close ties with the CCP. Beijing denied the latter claim. US government officials are considering sanctioning other Chinese crimes bosses across the Pacific.

Homeland Security’s acting executive director PJ Lechleitner said the US and its allies “were trying to play a little catch-up” to counter Beijing’s success in the region. He said the Chinese government “leverage those [transnational crime] organisations to basically exploit that and extend their sphere of influence”.

Lechleitner said Beijing-backed organised crime groups had made inroads in some Pacific Island nations by targeting “corrupt governments”.

“They come in, they influence that, they get in with the local governing structure. And then once they’re in, now they can start increasing their influence in that area and control more and more as they go.”

“The transnational criminal organisations throughout the Pacific are into everything, so they’re poly-criminal, meaning they will do whatever to make money. So they’re going to traffic in dangerous narcotics, any kind of drugs. They’re heavily involved in money laundering.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/illegal-malign-china-s-state-sponsored-crime-stretches-across-pacific-20230517-p5d8xe.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876597

File: 8b735d62156c5fa⋯.jpg (3.47 MB,7262x4710,3631:2355,Five_Eyes_Law_Enforcement_….jpg)

>>18876559

OPINION: There is a reason why the AFP won’t call out China

Nick McKenzie - May 20, 2023

Two things clearly emerge from a series of interviews conducted with the members of the most powerful police clique in the world – the Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group (FELEG).

Intelligence identifies China as the state actor posing the gravest threat to Australia by engaging in foreign interference, espionage, cybercrime and diaspora harassment.

And, even though he knows it, the highest ranking police officer in this country can’t publicly say so.

It would be easy for China hawks to attack Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw for his studied, stubborn refusal to mention Beijing on the sidelines of the recent FELEG meeting in Melbourne.

This is especially so given the robust stance towards Beijing adopted by his counterparts at the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, Canada’s Mounties and Britain’s top policing agencies.

Unsurprisingly, the Americans adopt the fiercest rhetoric against their superpower rival, with the FBI accusing Beijing of engaging in corrupt, clandestine and criminal acts to subvert democracy in Australia and other Five Eyes nations.

But Canada, where the political class has been indifferent to Chinese Communist Party interference in domestic politics until a foreign influence scandal blew up this year, has backed up the FBI’s assessment that the CCP is enabling organised crime to destabilise the west.

The FBI goes as far as accusing China of fuelling the fentanyl epidemic in North America by failing to regulate its precursor export industry.

The UK, where Russia looms as the most hostile state actor, is also calling out Beijing. All three Five Eyes nations have moved against extraterritorial, covert Chinese police stations that police officials claim were set up to track and intimidate dissidents.

If Kershaw’s reluctance to discuss China’s activities was due to Beijing’s economic coercion or the desire of Australia’s foreign affairs and trade officials to keep our biggest trading partner onside, it would be troubling.

But Kershaw’s careful language needs to be viewed in the prism of maintaining a flow of intelligence from Chinese authorities about drug shipments from triad syndicates that arrive on Australian shores every other week.

His is an unenviable juggling act. Kershaw’s federal agents have run exhaustive investigations into espionage and foreign interference allegedly conducted by Beijing’s security services in Australia.

At the same time, the AFP relies on information from these same security services to stop Australians dying of drug overdoses.

In stark contrast to the FBI, Kershaw also refuses to discuss Beijing’s malign influence activities in the Pacific.

But the $317 million given to the federal police by the Albanese government in the recent federal budget to expand its footprint in the Pacific is designed, at least in part, to counter China’s own efforts to expand its influence.

The FBI’s public claims that the CCP has greenlighted organised crime figures on Pacific Islands nations to act as agents of influence explains why Kershaw pushed so strongly for this funding. Even if he won’t say it publicly.

Nick McKenzie is an Age investigative journalist who has twice been named the Graham Perkin Australian Journalist of the Year. A winner of 14 Walkley Awards, he investigates politics, business, foreign affairs, human rights and criminal justice.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/there-is-a-reason-why-the-afp-won-t-call-out-china-20230519-p5d9si.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18876675

File: 66cfcf5f9cbb280⋯.jpg (301.26 KB,750x748,375:374,DTJr_4.jpg)

File: dccfa564e2f541b⋯.mp4 (11.81 MB,960x540,16:9,pbUnOG0G2_82D026.mp4)

>>18696839

>>18860803

Donald Trump Jr. Tweet

Donald Trump Jr. Live In Australia July 2023 with Turning Point Australia

https://trumplive.com.au

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1659556152013647875

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18880112

File: c07bb9258bb0482⋯.jpg (1.53 MB,4681x3344,4681:3344,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18865928

>>18875410

Albanese ‘to travel to China’ but opposition warns trade sanctions should be lifted first

Eryk Bagshaw, Matthew Knott and Farrah Tomazin - May 21, 2023

1/2

Hiroshima: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has told world leaders he intends to travel to China, signalling he will push ahead with stabilising the relationship with Beijing despite ongoing trade sanctions and the arbitrary detention of two Australians.

Albanese has not publicly confirmed a date for the trip, but the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s first visit to China as prime minister in October is looming as a symbolic marker for Canberra and Beijing after years of disputes over human rights, national security and trade.

“I’ve informed our partners that I do intend to travel to China at some time in the future,” Albanese said in Hiroshima where he is attending the G7 summit. “That has been welcomed. People regard it as very positive that Australia is in dialogue with China. You need dialogue to get understanding.”

But the federal opposition said Albanese should not travel to Beijing unless the Chinese government makes clear it will lift all restrictions on Australian imports.

“I think Australia does deserve to have absolute clarity that these trade sanctions are going to be lifted, and that clarity should be there before the prime minister entertains a formal state visit to Beijing,” opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham told the ABC’s Insiders program.

“Why? Because China is acting very clearly in breach of its commitments to Australia.”

While welcoming the improvement in bilateral relations, including the lifting of a Chinese ban on Australian timber imports last week, Birmingham said Australia should expect “nothing less” than for China to entirely lift all sanctions on Australian goods, including on wine and barley.

This should come without China expecting any concessions from Australia, he said.

Albanese said shortly after arriving in Hiroshima on Friday that it was important “that any of the impediments to trade between China and Australia be lifted”.

Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun remain in jail in China on vague national security charges. “On every opportunity we raise those issues,” said Albanese. “Cheng Lei hasn’t even been able to speak to her children. It’s not appropriate. We need transparency. Australia will continue to make representations to China on behalf of our citizens.”

Birmingham said the detention of the two Australians was a “very important and significant matter” and China’s lack of transparency about their circumstances was “completely unacceptable”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18880115

File: 6931cdbd1c322a8⋯.jpg (2.66 MB,5059x3614,5059:3614,The_leaders_of_Australia_J….jpg)

>>18880112

2/2

Albanese will meet with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Hiroshima on Sunday. The bilateral meetings follow a late-night Quad meeting on Saturday that committed to infrastructure development and funding telecommunications networks and undersea cables in a push from the four countries – Japan, Australia, India and the United States – to contain China’s influence in the Asia Pacific.

The meeting was scheduled to take place in Sydney on Wednesday but was rushed forward to Hiroshima and squeezed in before a G7 leaders dinner after the US debt crisis forced US President Joe Biden to shorten his trip.

“President Biden could not have done more than what we’ve done together over the last few days to have a Quad leaders meeting here,” Albanese said.

Biden apologised to Albanese in Hiroshima for having to cancel the visit to Sydney. “President Biden has said to me a number of times in his words ‘you guys are punching above your weight’ and Australia should not underestimate that,” said Albanese.

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Saturday highlighted Australia’s role in forcing China to “re-evaluate” its position in the region.

Clinton took to the stage in Washington to talk up the partnerships America had created in the face of China’s growing aggression.

“I was of the opinion that Xi would make his move against Taiwan sometime in three to four years of really consolidating his power,” Clinton said, speaking at the Financial Times Weekend Festival in Washington DC on Saturday (US time).

“But I think Ukraine has really set him back. What has happened in Ukraine has had a significant impact, in my view, on the Chinese leadership. I also give the Biden administration credit as I think their China policy has been quite adept and by that I mean in bringing this so-called Quad together … [and] working with the UK to deliver nuclear-powered submarines to Australia.”

Former prime minister Kevin Rudd also appeared at the event in his new role as Australia’s ambassador to the US, warning a war between the US and China would have “unspeakable consequences” with no simple means of retreat.

He said the US, Australia and its allies should continue engaging in “an active campaign of expanded deterrence to cause Xi Jinping to think twice and thrice about whether [he] could get away with any unilateral military action against Taiwan,” the democratic island that China claims as its own.

The aim, he said, was to “stabilise the US-China relationship”, which he said was “both an initiative from the administration and is now finally being reciprocated out of Beijing.”

Albanese said he had been advocating for guard rails to be put in place to avoid geopolitical tensions spilling over into war.

“You need dialogue to avoid miscalculation,” he said. “The lack of guard rails out there in international relations is of concern. And it’s important that they be put in place, the sort of guardrails that were in place for a long period of time during the period of US-Soviet competition during the Cold War.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/albanese-to-travel-to-china-but-opposition-warns-trade-sanctions-should-be-lifted-first-20230521-p5d9zf.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18880118

File: bc29971edde73f1⋯.jpg (2.26 MB,5281x3521,5281:3521,President_Joe_Biden_and_Pr….jpg)

File: ba3ec292ac98e72⋯.jpg (3.19 MB,5439x3626,3:2,Leaders_of_the_Quad_meet_o….jpg)

>>18860427

>>18876521

‘Ours must not be an era of war’: Quad leaders pledge investment in Asia Pacific

Eryk Bagshaw - May 21, 2023

Hiroshima: The Quad will build undersea cable systems and fund infrastructure development and telecommunications across the Asia Pacific in an expansion of its remit designed to blunt China’s growing influence in the region.

The announcement by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Joe Biden was coupled with a pledge to put south-east Asian nations and the Pacific Islands at the centre of its plans after a campaign by Beijing to paint the four nations as elite and out of touch with developing countries.

In a 3000-word statement that did not mention China, the four leaders took aim at its growing authoritarianism, Beijing’s pursuit of territorial claims in the South and East China seas, and economic intimidation.

“Our vision is for a region that is peaceful and prosperous, stable and secure, and respectful of sovereignty – free from intimidation and coercion, and where disputes are settled in accordance with international law,” the leaders said. “Conscious that ours must not be an era of war, we remain committed to dialogue and diplomacy.”

In his opening remarks, Kishida said the war in Ukraine showed the international security environment had become even more severe. “The open international order based on the law is under threat,” he said.

The Quad, which began as a response to the 2004 tsunami and has transformed into a security grouping that surrounds China geographically and has prompted regional scepticism for its expansion of US power, said it would respect the leadership of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Pacific Islands Forum and the Indian Ocean Rim Association.

China’s foreign ministry has described the Quad as “a tool to contain and circle China, and preserve America’s hegemony”,

But the four leaders were careful not to directly name Beijing on Saturday night in Hiroshima and did not respond to questions about whether concerns about China’s rise were driving decisions.

The investments will fund 1800 positions for infrastructure development to design and build and manage infrastructure across the Asia-Pacific, a strengthening of undersea cable networks and deployment of an Open Radio Access Network with Palau.

China has poured billions of dollars in investment into infrastructure across the region, including in the Solomon Islands, where it is building the facilities for this year’s Pacific Island Games. In 2019, Australia blocked Chinese telecommunication giant Huawei from building a high-speed undersea internet cable for the Pacific. Last year, the Australian government funded a $1.3 billion Telstra buyout of Pacific mobile network Digicel to prevent it from being snapped up by a Chinese-state-owned carrier.

“The Quad is committed to ensuring regional countries are not left behind as telecommunications markets and network architectures evolve,” the four leaders said.

Saturday’s meeting was rescheduled after Biden was forced to abandon his trip to Australia for the original summit due to the US debt ceiling crisis. The original summit in Sydney was scheduled to take place over a full day on Wednesday at the Opera House. The meeting in Hiroshima on the sidelines of the G7 lasted less than an hour.

Albanese, this year’s Quad chair, said it showed the group could be flexible. “It’s an example of our resolve,” he said.

Biden said he expected the network to have an impact on the world for decades.

“Many people are going to look back on the Quad, God willing, in 10, 20, 30 years from now and say you changed the dynamic not only in the region but of the world,” he said.

Modi confirmed next year’s Quad would not be rescheduled in Sydney.

“India looks forward to hosting the next Quad in 2024,” he said. “We are moving forward with a constructive agenda based on shared democratic values.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/ours-must-not-be-an-era-of-war-quad-leaders-pledge-investment-in-asia-pacific-20230521-p5d9yg.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18880124

File: 3286c2725ff8d62⋯.jpg (76.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,Kevin_Rudd.jpg)

‘Unspeakable consequences’: Kevin Rudd’s warning on China war

ADAM CREIGHTON - MAY 21, 2023

Kevin Rudd has painted a grim picture for Hong Kong’s future as an increasingly “Leninist and Marxist” Chinese Communist Party erodes the island’s freedoms and US-led coalition seeks to counteract Beijing’s growing military and economic might.

In one of his first public remarks as ambassador to the US, Mr Rudd also said the US, Australia and other democracies were united in an “active campaign of expanded deterrence to cause Xi Jinping to think twice and thrice about whether [China] could get away with any unilateral military action against Taiwan”.

“The fundamental reality here is the actual conduct of a war between the United States and its allies over Taiwan would spell unspeakable consequences for the world, and not just the Indo Pacific region”.

The former Labor prime minister, who took up his position as ambassador earlier this year, was a guest speaker at a Financial Times conference in Washington on Saturday (Sunday AEST).

“In terms of a message to the Hong Kong people it should be one of continued solidarity but the act to directly assert China‘s effective sovereignty over Hong Kong through the National Security Law in 2019 and 2020 has fundamentally changed the game and we cannot ignore that. It’s just a reality,” he said.

The US Congressional Executive Commission on China last week urged the Biden administration to sanction Hong Kong’s national security judges personally for their role in ignoring legal freedoms China had promised the UK under the terms of the 1997 handover, which were meant to last until at least 2047.

The number of political prisoners in Hong Kong, a former British colony with a population around 7.5m, has exploded from 26 in 2014 to 1,459 (including one as young as 13), mainly as a result of arrests made during and after the pro-democracy protests, according to the CECC.

“If you speak to people in the private sector, the ability to stick your head up and say anything, even criticise the legal system, which ultimately is the linchpin of Hong Kong‘s international commercial reputation, is now at stake,” Mr Rudd said, in answer to a question about complaints in Hong Kong that the west was deserting them.

Mr Rudd said the US and China should ensure “guardrails” so the two nations were not drawn into a cataclysmic war unintentionally, given the growing Chinese military presence in the Indo-Pacific at the same time as the US expands its naval presence in the Philippines.

“Neither of them has an interest in accidentally crossing trip-wires into crisis conflict and war by accident,” Mr Rudd said.

“I sometimes think as I read the general literature that a crisis over Taiwan is a bit like the Falklands crisis. It‘s going to happen over there: some ships will go bang and there are casualties on the ground. It ain’t like that.”

The ambassador’s remarks came as the leaders of the G7 nations, meeting in Hiroshima, condemned China’s “economic coercion” and militarisation of the South China Sea, two major bones of contention with the US alongside Beijing’s ongoing efforts to drawn Taiwan into its own political orbit.

“Xi Jinping has decided to take the Chinese Communist Party towards the Leninist left in politics and that means infinitely more power for the party over all aspects of Chinese life, society and public policy and national security and foreign policy too,” Mr Rudd, who recently completed a PhD on Xi Jinping’s philosophical disposition, said.

“He has also for ideological reasons, decided to take the centre of gravity of Chinese economics towards the Marxist left”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/rudd-paints-grim-picture-for-hong-kongs-future/news-story/3ac7ab13a62063e14271c30aa44a6eff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18880132

File: bf20cc3be5bef34⋯.jpg (212.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,Warning_winter_could_mark_….jpg)

File: cf137422e9c9820⋯.jpg (275.07 KB,750x843,250:281,PAE_1.jpg)

Warning winter could mark arrival of fifth Covid wave across Australia

MADELEINE ACHENZA - MAY 21, 2023

A prominent epidemiologist says it is “obvious” Australia is heading into its fifth wave of Covid.

Over the last week, 38,226 cases were reported across Australia, with an average of 5461 cases per day.

While cases are spiking in almost every state and territory – including a 44 per cent spike in Tasmania – the seven-day rolling average of 5461 is well below the nation’s peak of more than 100,000 cases in January 2022.

University of South Australia Professor Adrian Esterman said it is already very clear a new wave is coming in South Australia, where infections are forecast to double in the next fortnight.

“It‘s pretty much clear now across the country we’re going into a fifth Omicron wave,” he told the ABC.

“We’ve seen numbers going up now for three weeks in a row.”

It comes as health authorities are also reporting an increase in cases of influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV).

“It’s a triple whammy at the moment,” he said.

Diagnosis rates of influenza are 100 times higher than they were last year, with more than 40,000 cases of laboratory-proven influenza so far in 2023.

Of those, more than 8173 cases were diagnosed in the first half of May alone, according to the Australian Government’s National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.

NSW reported the most cases of Covid-19 in the last seven days with 2095 people diagnosed – an 18 per cent increase on the previous week.

However, mandatory testing and isolation rules for those with symptoms have not been in place for some time, so it is unlikely the recorded cases are reflective of the number of people in the community who have the illness.

Approximately 218,000 doses of Covid vaccine have been administered over the last 7 days adding to the more than 2.5 million adults who have received a booster dose since January.

The looming fifth wave will arrive in an entirely different landscape to the one before it, after the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared earlier this month that Covid-19 no longer represents a “global health emergency”.

The global virus death rate has dropped to just over 3500 a week in April after a peak of more than 100,000 people per week in January 2021, according to WHO data.

It is estimated the virus was the cause of almost 7 million deaths globally.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/warning-winter-could-mark-arrival-of-fifth-covid-wave-across-australia/news-story/a4b2472611a034af4cab85b6af3a155e

https://twitter.com/profesterman/status/1659452875930730496

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18880143

File: fe1eaa52af1a658⋯.jpg (241.42 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Veteran_pollster_Jim_Reed_….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18860464

OPINION: Now is a good time for the Yes campaign to panic

Parnell Palme McGuinness - May 21, 2023

1/2

When polling commissioned by this masthead showed that support for the Voice had slipped by five points down to just 53 per cent, powerful people on the Yes side decreed that the poll was a “bit of an outlier”. Any campaigner can tell you that polls sometimes bounce around. But minimising the trend, which the most recent track of polling continues, is foolish.

The Voice referendum is on track to fail. Now is a good time for the Yes campaign to panic, before it’s too late to change the trajectory. Conservative Yes supporters are panicking strategically. They are on a mission to save the Voice. They believe that the current wording will fail at referendum and that changing it is the only way to save the Voice. They face a closing window of opportunity.

Over the next few weeks, the report from the joint committee investigating the proposed constitutional alteration will be debated in parliament and in the Senate. The final report, from the Labor-dominated committee, recommends preserving the existing wording.

By some estimates, the window for change will close as soon as this coming week when the government will be faced with the choice to compromise or press ahead. Optimistically, others identify the Senate process, ending on June 22, as the last realistic opportunity to modify the words that Australians will vote on.

The author of the Liberal members’ dissenting report from the joint standing committee, Victorian MP Keith Wolahan, will speak in parliament on Monday. Wolahan’s report focuses on the risk that arises from the proposal to entrench in the Constitution the Voice’s power to make representations to the executive.

The report zeroes in on the admission by retired High Court judge Kenneth Hayne, AC, a member of the government’s Constitutional Expert Group, that “a duty to consult the Voice would ‘disrupt the ordinary and efficient working of government’ to such an extent that it would ‘bring government to a halt’.”

It quotes another Voice proponent, former chief justice Robert French, who has noted that predictions about how courts would decide questions of law “involve evaluative judgments upon which reasonable minds can differ”. The report concludes that “uncertainty is magnified where a provision is unique and has no constitutional comparison” – essentially, even a small risk, multiplied by the severity of its consequences, must be considered a significant risk and mitigated.

The report lists a number of options for risk mitigation: the deletion of the section referencing executive government, proposed by former shadow cabinet minister Julian Leeser; the insertion of a new section restricting the Voice from pursuing judicial review in the High Court, proposed by conservative pro-Voice organisation Uphold and Recognise; an addition to “expressly empower the parliament to make laws declaring the legal effect of the Voice’s representations”, proposed by Professor Greg Craven; and substituting the words “executive government” for “ministers of state” as proposed by Father Frank Brennan. Each option provides a different way to address the constitutional risk which makes voters who are in favour of reconciliation shy away from the Voice.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18880146

File: e838c24a9afad78⋯.jpg (3.37 MB,5408x3605,5408:3605,Warren_Mundine_with_Senato….jpg)

>>18880143

2/2

Dean Parkin, figurehead of the campaign now known as Yes23, says he believes the Yes campaign will get back on track without a change to the wording of the proposed constitutional amendment, which would drag the debate “back into legalese”. Meanwhile, prominent Indigenous activist Noel Pearson referred to calls for compromise by fellow Indigenous leader and former human rights commissioner Mick Gooda as “bedwetting”.

Both statements raise the question of whether the Yes side is ignoring the campaign specialists advising them, or whether the advice is really that bad. The first is a triumph of hope over campaign experience; the second is, to put it mildly, an own goal.

Damien Freeman, from Uphold and Recognise, believes that voters who worry about constitutional risk can be won over by tightening the wording ahead of a referendum that looks likely to pass or fail on single digits. He warns against reducing the campaign challenge to communications alone.

Veteran pollster Jim Reed, who conducted the most recent polling, agrees. Yes23 has $17 million at its disposal, but as Reed has pointed out, “no amount of advertising is going to sell a product that people aren’t sure about”.

Similarly, no amount of thundering against people of good will towards the Voice is going to win it more friends. There is no point spending $17 million or any other amount on something that doesn’t have enough support to begin with.

And it’s not just the Resolve Poll, but the aggregate of 28 polls that shows support headed in the wrong direction. Past referendums show that a downward trend is more likely to accelerate than reverse.

If Yes campaigners still refuse to accept that they need saving, the government can nonetheless save them. “Ultimately, the final wording is a call for the government,” Freeman says. “And the parliament who must put something to the people that can win.” There is plenty of constructive input and enough good will from the conservative side of politics for the government to change the wording and the trajectory of the referendum.

Parnell Palme McGuinness is Managing Director, Strategy and Policy at award-winning campaigns firm Agenda C. The company was engaged to work for a Liberal Party MP during the federal election. She has also worked for the German Greens.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/now-is-a-good-time-for-the-yes-campaign-to-panic-20230518-p5d9cb.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7d1207 No.18883608

File: d2de468c1520887⋯.png (778.03 KB,1311x499,1311:499,ClipboardImage.png)

File: d5f3ec4fe9386fe⋯.png (1.97 MB,1284x940,321:235,ClipboardImage.png)

>>18880124

Piece of shit, psychopath, Rudd.

Epstein sycophant.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885050

File: 4b41d5e7ab4a415⋯.jpg (587.2 KB,2375x1583,2375:1583,Stella_Assange_at_a_rally_….jpg)

>>18676828

‘We are considering all options’: Assange supporters open to a plea deal with US

David Crowe - May 22, 2023

1/2

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange are open to a plea deal with United States authorities that might clear the way for his release from a British prison, with his wife declaring his freedom had to be the priority.

Urging the Australian government to press the case for his release, Stella Assange said her husband was being detained for revealing the truth and must never be extradited to face charges in the US.

But she and the WikiLeaks founder’s lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, acknowledged that a plea deal was one option to end his incarceration in the way a negotiation led to the release of former Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks in 2007.

“For Julian, this is a life and death situation. Julian has to be free and that is the primary priority,” Stella Assange told the National Press Club in Canberra on Monday.

Robinson said the Hicks case was a good example of a potential pathway. She insisted her client had not committed any crime and noted he had been given journalism awards for the reports named in the charges against him.

The US Department of Justice gained a sealed indictment against Assange in March 2018 accusing him of violating espionage laws by releasing confidential information about the country’s military and security operations. The US is seeking to extradite Assange from London, where he has been held in a high-security prison since 2019.

“We are considering all options. The difficulty is that our primary position is, of course, that the case ought to be dropped,” Robinson said.

“We say that no crime has been committed and the facts involved in the case don’t support a crime. So what is it that Julian would be pleading to?”

The board of the Walkley Awards gave WikiLeaks the prize for most outstanding contribution to journalism in 2011 and praised it for delivering an “avalanche of inconvenient truths” during a courageous commitment to journalism.

Robinson and Stella Assange, who married the WikiLeaks founder last year in London’s Belmarsh prison, are visiting Australia this week to build the case for his release, in part by emphasising that putting him on trial in the US would be an assault on the freedom of the press.

Robinson named the “collateral murder” video released in 2010, showing US forces killing civilians and journalists in Iraq, as an example of the journalism WikiLeaks had done in a similar way to other media.

“These are important publications and that gets lost in the conversation about Julian,” she said.

“WikiLeaks won the most outstanding contribution to journalism award in 2011 in this country for the very same publications for which Julian sits in prison and faces 175 years in a US prison and we cannot forget that fact.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885052

File: 2fbdc5d6ef461e7⋯.jpg (2.04 MB,4549x3033,4549:3033,Stella_Assange_speaks_to_s….jpg)

>>18885050

2/2

News organisations including The New York Times, Le Monde, Der Spiegel and El País issued a joint letter last November calling on the US government to drop the charges against Assange.

Robinson and Stella Assange faced questions at the National Press Club, however, over the decision by WikiLeaks during the US election campaign in 2016 to release emails from the Democratic National Committee that undercut Hillary Clinton in her bid for the presidency.

Assange said claims her husband was a propagandist for Russia were baseless and nothing he had published had been shown to be false. She noted he had stated the 2016 emails had not come from Russia and that others had described them as being of public importance.

She also denied claims, often made about WikiLeaks over the past decade, that it had put lives at risk with its disclosures, arguing instead it had made redactions before publication.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has raised the case with the US administration and publicly declared the incarceration should end, while Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said in early May the case had gone on too long.

Tasmanian independent Andrew Wilkie challenged Albanese in question time on Monday over why the prime minister had not met Stella Assange during her visit to Canberra.

“What I have done is to act in the most effective way possible,” Albanese said in reply, adding that he appreciated the bipartisan support that “enough is enough” on the detention. He confirmed he had made representations about Assange to the US and UK governments.

“A priority for us is not doing something that is a demonstration, it is doing something that produces an outcome,” he said.

Assange and Robinson made no criticism of the Australian government on Monday and acknowledged that an outcome would depend on the ability to persuade the US authorities to relent.

“Julian’s life is in the hands of the Australian government,” Stella Assange said.

“It is not my place to tell the Australian government how to do it, but it must be done. Julian must be released and I place hope in Anthony Albanese’s will to make it happen. I have to. This is the closest we’ve ever been to securing Julian’s release.”

The Australian lawyer for Assange, Stephen Kenny, who also acted for Hicks before his release, said he was doubtful the US Department of Justice would be open to a plea deal.

“My assessment of the American position is that they are quite content to see Julian suffer as long and as much as possible.

“There does not appear to be any real activity or willingness on their part to engage in any proper discussions about a plea deal, even if Julian was willing to take one,” he said.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/we-are-considering-all-options-assange-supporters-open-to-a-plea-deal-with-us-20230522-p5daad.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885057

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18676828

>>18885050

IN FULL: Stella Assange, Jennifer Robinson address National Press Club on Julian Assange

ABC News (Australia)

May 22, 2023

Stella Assange was part of Julian Assange's legal team since his confinement in the Ecuadorian embassy and they got Married in 2022. Jennifer Robinson has been advising Julian Assange and Wikileaks since 2010. Julian Assange has been confined in Belmarsh prison since April 2019.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrsQxRtSBU0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885064

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18676828

>>18885050

Prime Minister dodges Stella Assange meeting

Andrew Wilkie

May 22, 2023

“Prime Minister you would be aware that Stella Assange is in Parliament House, and in fact is in the gallery right now.

“Prime Minister why are you not meeting with Stella today?

“Will you meet with Stella tomorrow?

“And why won’t you do more to see Julian Assange reunited with Stella and their young sons Gabriel and Max?”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=584rbI6FV8k

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885076

File: bb80e9e2c21ab26⋯.jpg (82.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Liberal_MP_Julian_Leeser_i….jpg)

File: 0cd1b50256354b5⋯.jpg (112.95 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Australian_Greens_led_….jpg)

>>18676743

Greens and Pocock give Leeser hope of achieving a compromise on the Aboriginal voice

PAIGE TAYLOR - MAY 22, 2023

Liberal MP Julian Leeser is making a last-ditch attempt to get crossbench MPs and Indigenous leaders to support a compromise on the Indigenous voice, buoyed by the fact the Greens and independent senator David Pocock are yet to form a position on his plan to strip back the proposed new chapter to the constitution.

Mr Leeser, who quit Peter Dutton’s frontbench to support the Yes campaign, believes he has cut through with some in discussions about why the voice’s authority to advise executive government and parliament should be spelled out in legislation rather than in the constitution. The MP had been speaking to former Social Justice Commissioner Mick Gooda for weeks before Mr Gooda went public with his view that compromise was worth considering.

One other Indigenous leader aligned to the Yes case has told The Australian they saw some merit to his argument that taking out the executive government clause could help the referendum succeed.

But The Australian has been told the government is locked in behind the words of the proposed new constitutional chapter announced by Anthony Albanese on March 23, as the House of Representatives debates the Constitutional Alteration Bill this week.

Government sources say they do not want to change the wording as it is the culmination of more than a decade of work on constitutional recognition, and that it is the broadly supported position of Mr Albanese’s referendum working group.

“You cannot recognise Indigenous people in the constitution in a way they do not wish to be recognised that does not work,” said one government source familiar with Mr Albanese’s thinking.

Another said: “It would be a bloody disaster to switch horses now”.

However, Senator Pocock, a key vote in getting any Bill through the senate, is yet to reveal how he will vote and whether he will support Mr Leeser’s amendments flagged at the National Press Club on April 3.

“Dave has been, and continues to, consult on this Bill, with local First Nations leaders, members of the referendum working group and members of the Coalition, including Mr Leeser, in coming to a position,” a spokesman for Senator Pocock said.

The Greens could veto Mr Leeser’s amendments but on Sunday the party was yet to decide if it would. The Australian has been told the Greens will discuss it in the party room this week.

Mr Leeser said his reasons for proposing changes to the agreed words were well-known: he believes it will improve the referendum’s chances of success.

“This is no secret. I have been meeting Indigenous leaders, ministers, crossbenchers and other parties since my resignation and seeking amendments that will move the referendum to a stronger electoral footing,” he said.

Mr Leeser says he will vote yes at the referendum, due to be held between October and December, even if the current wording of the proposed amendment does not change.

Former prime minister and No supporter Tony Abbott writes in The Australian on Monday that conservatives should oppose the voice, even if Mr Leeser succeeds in securing compromise on the executive government clause.

“A constitutionally entrenched Indigenous voice that was only to the parliament would certainly be a less radical change. But it would remain just as unnecessary given there are already 11 individual Indigenous voices in our parliament. And it would be no less wrong in principle,” he says.

Kado Muir, a senior Mantjiltjara Ngalia man from the western deserts and a member of the government’s referendum engagement group, said Indigenous people had already given a lot of ground.

“There are First Nations people who prefer a treaty. Constitutionally enshrined voice is the compromise,” he said.

Mr Leeser has repeatedly said he wants the voice to win at the referendum because failure would be catastrophic for the country and for reconciliation.

“A loss would set back reconciliation for a generation,” Mr Leeser said on Friday.

“As well, I support the voice because the current system is broken. As a nation we are failing on Indigenous health, education, housing, safety and economic advancement.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/greens-and-pocock-give-leeser-hope-of-achieving-a-compromise-on-the-aboriginal-voice/news-story/5b21b0b6cc6699117f833c366a17fedb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885095

File: 53079d99ec89871⋯.jpg (88.54 KB,1280x720,16:9,Tony_Abbott_speaks_to_the_….jpg)

File: 9d7ea801bd76390⋯.jpg (207.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_watered_down_Indigenous_….jpg)

>>18676743

A watered down Indigenous voice to parliament would still be an affront to the ideal of constitutional equality, writes former prime minister Tony Abbott

TONY ABBOTT - MAY 22, 2023

1/2

Because Indigenous voice to parliament supporters are worried the referendum might fail, they’re now arguing among themselves about whether to water down their proposed change to our system of government.

A constitutionally entrenched Indigenous voice that was only to the parliament would certainly be a less radical change. But it would remain just as unnecessary given there are already 11 individual Indigenous voices in our parliament. And it would be no less wrong in principle.

Any special voice – for some but not for others, especially a voice based on ancestry – would still mean we are no longer one, equal people.

It would still be an affront to the ideal of constitutional equality even if it were a voice only to the parliament, and only on laws specifically relating to Indigenous people.

It would still mean two classes of Australians: the few, whose ancestry here could be traced back some 60,000 years; and the many, whose ancestry in this country dates only from 1788; with the few given a special right to influence legislation over and above that accorded to the many.

It would still mean some people, based on the length of their links to this country, would get a special say over how they were treated compared with that accorded to everyone else.

And it would still be a change to the way we are governed, rather than the simple recognition of Indigenous people in the Constitution that almost everyone supports.

The pro-voice proponents now calling for the voice to be changed, such as Mick Gooda, Julian Leeser and Father Frank Brennan, can see from the polls that Australians are waking up to just what a far-reaching change the current proposal is.

Voters are starting to work out that giving the Indigenous voice a constitutional right to make representations to everyone on everything is going to gum up our government and ensure it can do nothing of substance without first obtaining a measure of Indigenous consent.

Indeed, that’s precisely what voice proponents want: a voice that can’t be ignored or shut up, says Megan Davis; a voice that will have its remit determined by the High Court, says Marcia Langton.

But a voice whose powers are ultimately decided by the unelected High Court; and a voice that exerts an effective veto over government, especially a voice that might end up picked through an opaque and undemocratic process that can change from community to community, is hardly a voice that people would vote for, which is why only a few of its proponents are honest about what they want it to be.

Then there’s the growing realisation that the voice is just the first demand of the Uluru Statement from the Heart to which the Albanese government is committed “in full”. There’s also treaties between the federal government and the 500-plus Indigenous “First Nations”, who supposedly never ceded sovereignty, plus “truth-telling” to counter the view that Australia’s history is something to be proud of.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885096

File: e34a79f9ae79ae1⋯.jpg (78.08 KB,768x1024,3:4,Peter_Dutton.jpg)

File: ac84b51e6082b71⋯.jpg (82.99 KB,768x1024,3:4,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

>>18885095

2/2

Those wanting the voice to be watered down, from the current fourth arm of government, to a constitutionally sanctified advisory body to the parliament (and perhaps also to ministers too) think this might allay fears that this is really a power grab by Indigenous activists masquerading as constitutional recognition and that it might make it easier for the federal parliamentary Liberal Party to drop its opposition to the voice.

The voice modifiers are decent people who are understandably worried about the bitterness a failed referendum could engender, hence their eagerness to make it more acceptable. But the voice opponents are decent people too, also worried about the bitterness of a failed referendum, just not enough to acquiesce in a dud change that should have been better thought through from the start.

Whether they’re pro or anti voice, none of the current proposal’s critics deserve the vitriol Noel Pearson has directed at them. Instead of providing the prophetic leadership of which he is sometimes capable, Pearson’s bullying of everyone who dares to disagree illustrates just how divisive this voice of his would be.

A voice that could make representations to a much more limited range of entities and that had the effect of its representations clearly defined would certainly be less of a potential disruption to the work of government.

But, while it would be less bad in practice it would still be wrong in principle and, in my judgment, it would be a huge mistake to say yes to something that’s wrong in principle out of relief that it could have been worse.

Whether it’s a voice to the whole of government or just to the parliament, it could hardly be more at odds with what we used to tell ourselves about our country: that each and every one of us, male or female, black or white, old or young, immigrant or native-born, rich or poor, religious or not – provided there was a commitment to Australia – were all first-class citizens with the same rights and responsibilities.

We don’t give a special voice to women, or to migrants, or to people with disabilities, even though the parliament sometimes passes laws that particularly refer to them, and even though they, too, have sometimes not had the fair go from our system that they deserve.

Likewise, we can’t give a special voice to the First Australians without establishing a hierarchy of descent; or indeed, a pecking order among all the victims of history.

Seeking an 11th-hour compromise will hardly allay people’s misgivings, just reinforce them, and confirm the Liberal Party was always right to say no.

Tony Abbott was the 28th prime minister of Australia, 2013-15.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/a-watered-down-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-would-still-be-an-affront-to-the-ideal-of-constitutional-equality-writes-former-prime-minister-tony-abbott/news-story/379187599feb8a2ca9a4665734730cb4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885110

File: ccfd36d1069a2e3⋯.jpg (2.11 MB,4386x2924,3:2,Noel_Pearson_We_advocate_p….jpg)

File: fd6601e06d5d438⋯.jpg (3.51 MB,5022x3348,3:2,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18676743

Parliament erupts over Dutton’s claim Voice will ‘re-racialise’ Australia

ByLisa Visentin and James Massola - May 22, 2023

1/2

Bitter divisions over the Voice to parliament have descended into a feud over whether the proposal will unite or “re-racialise” Australia, with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton denouncing it as a regressive and radical threat to Australia’s democracy.

But Voice architect Noel Pearson says a successful referendum will lead to “plurality, not apartheid” in Australia and that constitutional recognition will finally bring Indigenous Australians in from the margins of society.

In a speech at Sydney University on Monday evening, Pearson argued that if the Yes vote in the referendum succeeded, the “Voice will be a decisive step towards moving Australia from the old settler-native society to one, perhaps, where we are all natives of Australia”.

As federal parliament began debating the landmark piece of legislation that will authorise the Voice referendum, Dutton used his speech in the chamber to signal the attack lines that will form the basis of his campaign against the constitutional change, declaring it a “divisive, disrupting and democracy-altering Canberra-based Voice”.

“It will have an Orwellian effect where all Australians are equal, but some Australians are more equal than others,” he said.

“If the Voice is embedded in our Constitution, there will be little to rejoice for when we sing the second line of our national anthem – ‘For we are one and free’.

“For instead of being ‘one’, we will be divided – in spirit, and in law.”

But Pearson on Monday struck a more moderate tone after a scorching attack on Indigenous leader Mick Gooda last week and last month accusing Dutton’s Liberals of a “Judas betrayal of our country” for opposing the Voice, arguing it was about integration, not separatism.

“We advocate plurality, not apartheid. We want differences of all kinds to be respected whilst always avoiding separatism,” Pearson said.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney repudiated Dutton’s claims, telling the chamber his speech was the embodiment of scare campaigns that were seeking to derail the Yes campaign.

“We have just heard, in one speech, every bit of disinformation and misinformation and scare campaigns that exist in this debate,” Burney said.

Drawing on the precedent of the 1967 referendum, in which Australians voted overwhelmingly for constitutional change to allow the Commonwealth to make laws for Aboriginal people and include them in the census, Burney said the Voice referendum also was about fairness and hope for a better future.

“In 2023, it is time for recognition. It’s time for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to the parliament because Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have not enjoyed the same opportunities as so many other Australians,” Burney said.

She said the Voice would deliver structural change “that empowers Indigenous communities” and would ensure governments get “better advice so that we get better policies and better outcomes”.

She cited the legal advice of Solicitor-General Stephen Donaghue, KC, who concluded the proposed constitutional amendment to enshrine the Voice would enhance Australia’s system of government, but she acknowledged this was “not enough for those hell-bent on dashing the hopes of a people”.

“It’s not enough for those trying to play politics with an issue that should be above partisan politics,” Burney said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885113

File: e726dd5583060d0⋯.jpg (4.72 MB,5734x3823,5734:3823,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>18885110

2/2

Thomas Mayo, a board director of the Yes 23 campaign and member of the government’s Indigenous referendum advisory group, condemned Dutton’s comments as the “lowest of the low”.

“It’s race-baiting and disinformation but at the end of the day, Australians are sick of this kind of politics and will judge him accordingly,” Mayo said.

Dutton accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of trying to leverage the overwhelming public support for constitutional recognition and conflating it with the Voice, which he called the “most radical and consequential change to the way our democracy operates in our nation’s history”.

“If Australians have buyer’s remorse, the Voice comes with a no-return policy. It’s here to stay in it. This institution hasn’t even been road-tested,” Dutton said.

He also tapped into the long-running debate over the Voice’s capacity to advise executive government, which includes ministers and the public service, claiming the Voice could “grind our system to a halt from the resulting years of litigation”.

This assertion was also raised by a number of constitutional conservatives and legal experts during the six-week parliamentary inquiry into the Voice referendum, but was rejected by a larger cohort of eminent jurists, lawyers and academics who endorsed the proposed constitutional amendment to enshrine the Voice as legally sound.

Dutton said while the Coalition opposed the Voice, it would not stand in the way of the bill’s passage, therefore allowing the referendum to proceed and the Australian people to have their say.

Tasmanian Liberal MP Bridget Archer, one of a small group of Coalition MPs who supports the Voice, rejected the argument made by Dutton and others that the referendum would divide the country by race, saying the Constitution continued to have a race power that had been used to make laws about First Nations people.

“So if these laws exist, it’s reasonable in my mind that Indigenous people have their voices heard over those laws,” Archer said.

Victorian Liberal MP Russell Broadbent, who is yet to speak on the bill but intends to support it, told this masthead the Voice debate had been divisive and though he was a long-time supporter of the proposal, he was being told by local Indigenous elders in his electorate of Monash to vote No in the referendum.

“They are asking me to vote No – and not only that, but they’re advocating in the community to vote No. So there’s a bit more to this than we can perceive,” he said.

Meanwhile also on Monday, the late Gumatj clan leader Galarrwuy Yunupingu won a historic Native Title fight in the Federal Court over the Commonwealth’s decision to allow mining on Gumatj country in north-east Arnhem Land in 1968 without the consent of traditional owners.

His brother, clan leader Djawa Yunupingu, said the case was a “continuance of his life’s work, which began with the Bark Petition and the Gove Land Rights case to have Native Title properly recognised as the heart of the identity of all First Nations People”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/dutton-claims-voice-will-racialise-the-country-as-burney-condemns-disinformation-20230522-p5dab4.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885147

File: f496d353e284427⋯.jpg (153.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Victims_of_Crime_Commi….jpg)

File: 47d0c33ed44c670⋯.jpg (76.92 KB,768x768,1:1,Superintendent_Scott_Molle….jpg)

>>18708667

Brittany Higgins ‘had to do media as face of #MeToo movement’: Victims advocate told cop

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - MAY 22, 2023

1/2

A senior police officer says when he asked that Brittany Higgins stop doing media that could prejudice Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial, Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates told him: “She can’t, Scott – she is the face of the movement now.”

In a submission to the Sofronoff inquiry, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller says Ms Yates was “more interested in Ms Higgins pushing the ‘#metoo’ movement than being committed to the upcoming trial”.

“This upset me and I remember being mad that the Victims of Crime Commissioner was using the investigation as a voice for reform before the trial had even been conducted,” he says.

Superintendent Moller compiled the investigative review document, informally called the Moller report, that has become a key focus of the Sofronoff inquiry, which is probing the conduct of chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold in withholding it from Mr Lehrmann’s defence team.

In his 50-page statement to the inquiry, Superintendent Moller says that when he created the Moller report, it was an internal decision-making document; it was “never my intention” for the document to go to the DPP for legal advice, as the DPP has claimed, he says.

Superintendent Moller, who has been a police officer for more than 30 years, is expected to give evidence to the inquiry on Monday. Led by Walter Sofronoff KC, the inquiry is also examining the conduct of police and Ms Yates, who became a highly visible presence during the trial, often seen accompanying Ms Higgins to court. Earlier in the case, Ms Higgins had asked for any contact by police to be made through Ms Yates, a move that Superintendent Moller says caused serious problems for investigators.

“I personally found her involvement frustrating and cumbersome, and she made it difficult for ACT Police to contact the victim,” he says.

Superintendent Moller says Ms Yates’ participation in the investigation was inappropriate and added additional stress and anxiety to the investigation team.

He felt Ms Yates was attempting to place a barrier between investigators and Ms Higgins.

Superintendent Moller says he could not understand why the head of the organisation was acting as “support person” to an alleged victim of a sexual assault.

“The VCC acting personally in a support/conduit role complicated the investigation and was always highly inappropriate,” he says.

“I felt one of the more upsetting aspects of her involvement was her lack of involvement in other sexual assault matters that were progressing through the courts at the same time.”

Superintendent Moller says there was “significant external and internal pressure” to erode the threshold for charging a person with a sexual offence, and to erode investigators’ “independent and objective search for the truth”.

“It appears to me this is in response to public discourse about the treatment of survivors in the criminal justice system,” he says.

As an example, he cites a recent ACT government report by the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Steering Committee that records one of its aims as “to ensure victims survivors know that when they disclose sexual violence they will be believed”.

“This is fundamentally at odds with the investigative function of police and the purpose of the criminal justice system (judiciary and juries),” Superintendent Moller says in his submission.

“We as police are the first ‘filter’ to ensuring the integrity of the criminal justice system. The judiciary and the community require and expect police to critically assess all available information and evidence in determining if the threshold to charge has been met.”

Superintendent Moller says he received reports that when DPP prosecutor Skye Jerome held training sessions for AFP officers, Ms Jerome “was dismissive and condescending of the investigators and that many of the investigators were offended by the way she had presented”.

“Additionally, I was informed she has stated that in sexual assault investigations, ‘an evidence-in-chief-interview and statement of complaint is sufficient to go ahead … because police are not the finder of facts’. These comments astounded me.”

Superintendent Moller says he was briefed on a meeting between police and DPP members at which Ms Jerome had advised, during an open discussion about the evidence, that prosecutions would not be progressed when victims did not hand over their mobile telephone.

“The investigators advised that Ms Higgins had not handed her phone over,” he says. “On hearing this information, I was briefed that Skye Jerome dropped her head into her hands in what appeared to be frustration and alarm.

“After these meetings I was concerned for the independence and integrity of the investigation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885156

File: f951c1b46ecce4e⋯.jpg (80.04 KB,768x768,1:1,Brittany_Higgins_with_ACT_….jpg)

File: b8915f05b2fb19e⋯.jpg (106.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Crown_Prosecutor_Shane_Dru….jpg)

>>18885147

2/2

Superintendent Moller became aware that an investigation into Ms Higgins’ complaints had recommenced in February 2021, after she had previously declined to proceed with a complaint.

“The significant aspects of that briefing for me was that Ms Higgins was not willing to provide a formal statement at that time and wanted to delay providing the statement until after a news article by journalist, Samantha Maiden had been published and that she had already participated in an interview with Lisa Wilkinson which was to be aired on The Project,” he says.

“I did not understand why Ms Higgins had chosen to involve the media prior to providing police with a formal statement, however my briefing articulated that Ms Higgins wanted to ensure the investigation was ‘active’ to support the media releases. This had me immediately suspicious and questioning the motives of Ms Higgins for reporting the incident.”

This strategy by Ms Higgins “significantly hindered the investigation” as it was extremely difficult for investigators to progress the investigation without a statement of complaint, he says.

In his statement, Superintendent Moller says that when he met with Mr Drumgold on June 1 2021 – three weeks before the DPP received the brief of evidence on June 21 – “it was clear to me that he had already decided on progressing the prosecution even though he had not reviewed the evidence.”

During this conversation, Superintendent Moller claims Mr Drumgold said: “I don’t have to prove sex occurred” because, according to Mr Drumgold, Ms Higgins’s state of undress, when she was found, corroborated that sex took place.

“I expressed the concerns I had for Ms Higgins’ psychological health, the concerns we as investigators had with the evidence and the compounding pressure and issues associated with continual media reporting,” Superintendent Moller says.

“Mr Drumgold was dismissive of our concerns and then directed the conversation to the threshold for police to seek DPP advice. I felt Mr Drumgold was highlighting that police only required reasonable suspicion to lay a charge and the DPP would decide and advise on whether there was a reasonable prospect of conviction. He was very eager for the matter to be referred to him.”

On June 17, 2021, Superintendent Moller and Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman met Deputy Chief Police Officer Michael Chew about his direction to forward the brief of evidence to the DPP for advice.

Superintendent Moller informed Mr Chew that he “thought there was insufficient evidence to proceed”.

Diary notes of that meeting, in which Mr Chew was alleged to have said “there is too much political interference” not to proceed, were first revealed by The Australian in December.

In his statement to the inquiry, Superintendent Moller says those were the words used by Mr Chew and that he had responded: “That’s disappointing given I think there is insufficient evidence.”

Superintendent Moller says the investigating team were uncomfortable about Mr Drumgold’s advice to proceed with charges.

Police were also concerned about Mr Drumgold’s relationship with prominent media figures including news.com.au political editor Samantha Maiden, who first broke the story of the rape allegations by Ms Higgins.

“It did make me feel uncomfortable when the evidence revealed Mr Drumgold was communicating with journalist Samantha Maiden during the investigation and well prior to trial,” Superintendent Moller says.

He says he felt during the ­entire investigation that Mr Drumgold “was not collegiate and was attempting to collect information on myself and the investigation members with the intention of criticising the AFP and the investigation team to deflect any criticism away from him and his office”.

“This added a significant burden to the investigation team and a feeling of complete isolation which I have never experienced previously,” he says.

Superintendent Moller also ­rejects claims made to the inquiry by Mr Drumgold that investigators were overly friendly with the defence team during the trial, and that there were “at least three ­occasions” when he saw the defence team “stand in a circle” that included AFP officers.

He says that on the day he ­attended the trial with three other officers “I noticed that the DPP seemed to be ignoring the police”.

“I felt like they did not want anything to do with us which in my experience was highly unusual,” he says.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-had-to-do-media-as-face-of-metoo-movement/news-story/686a9a2031ca054da425fe8e60bd975d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885169

File: 34551b4598f3bc0⋯.jpg (102.31 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Superintendent_Scott_Molle….jpg)

File: 8ce057e0cec121d⋯.jpg (113.67 KB,1024x768,4:3,ACT_chief_prosecutor_Shane….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18885147

DPP Shane Drumgold’s CCTV evidence tampering claim ‘vexatious’

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - MAY 22, 2023

The senior police officer who led the investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape allegations has slammed Shane Drumgold for suggesting that police deliberately destroyed or deleted CCTV footage of Ms Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann, claiming the chief prosecutor had embarrassingly confused a Four Corners re-enactment with the real thing.

Detective Superintendent Scott Moller has in a statement told the Sofronoff inquiry that the inference of corrupt or dishonest behaviour was “vexatious, without any merits and offensive to an extremely committed, hardworking and competent investigation team”.

Mr Drumgold claimed CCTV footage showed Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann arriving at Parliament House on the night of her alleged rape. The police were certain the video never existed, but Mr Drumgold was insistent he had personally watched it on a USB drive provided by police but then returned to them.

The Australian has previously revealed that the suggestion of evidence-tampering caused a serious rift between police and the Director of Public Prosecutions.

In a submission to the inquiry, Mr Drumgold said in the footage he recalled “Ms Higgins could be seen swaying behind his (Mr Lehrmann’s) right shoulder. She moved her right hand to a wall as if to stabilise herself.”

Superintendent Moller, however, said it appeared that Mr Drumgold “had confused footage from a Four Corners release where they developed a recreation of the event with the investigators recovered CCTV footage”.

The Four Corners program featured various re-enactments and night-time exterior shots of Parliament House, although none showing the precise scene as described by Mr Drumgold.

Superintendent Moller said the investigating team diverted its efforts and worked for weeks to ­attempt to identify the footage and if such footage ever existed, they had never located it.

“This caused a significant divide between the investigation team and the DPP,” he said.

“These undertones in relation to the investigators’ corrupt or dishonest behaviour continued throughout the prosecution and were entirely without foundation and offensive to our investigation team.”

Mr Drumgold told the inquiry that he did not think the footage had been deliberately deleted but that was not the impression of police at the time, and the insinuation caused a further breakdown in an already fraught relationship between the investigation team and the DPP.

“I believe Mr Drumgold’s own actions at this early time alienated the investigators and ACTP management from the DPP,” Superintendent Moller says in his statement.

Mr Drumgold’s co-counsel Skye Jerome said she “was sure” she saw the footage, although they watched it on separate occasions, and told investigators she hoped “nothing unlawful” had happened to the footage.

Ms Jerome said she recalled a woman and a man standing at a gate with a buzzer and walking through the gate.

Her account of what she saw has been partially redacted by the inquiry.

“I recall that the omitted CCTV footage depicted Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann [redacted] at APH (Australian Parliament House). I recall that Mr Lehrmann stood in front of Ms Higgins who was a ­little unsteady/shifted her body weight. I recall that I briefly saw the pair [redacted].”

If it existed, the footage would have countered the view of police that Ms Higgins was not as heavily intoxicated – “10/10 drunk” – as she had claimed.

Ms Jerome says in her statement that police had shown her other CCTV footage and “focused their observations of a sober woman entering Parliament House”.

A clearly annoyed Mr Drumgold complained that the missing footage, although not crucial to the case, would have formed part of the trial brief because it was mat­erial to a fact in issue.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/dpp-shane-drumgolds-cctv-evidence-tampering-claim-vexatious/news-story/48f7410c08f2f9862e8a95b438960c3b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885211

File: 4e5b631fc6d8357⋯.mp4 (15.92 MB,640x360,16:9,Detective_testifies_in_inq….mp4)

>>18708667

>>18885147

Pressure to ‘progress’ Bruce Lehrmann rape allegation forced police into medical leave, inquiry told

KRISTIN SHORTEN and REMY VARGA - MAY 22, 2023

1/4

The senior police officer who oversaw the investigation of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann said that detectives were under so much pressure to progress the matter against their professional beliefs that many went on medical leave.

Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, who is giving evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system on Monday, told chair Walter Sofronoff KC that on August 5, 2021 Commander Michael Chew told him to have a summons served on Mr Lehrmann due to the “significant pressure” on police to charge the 29-year-old.

Supt Moller said he then passed the direction on to Detective Sergeant Robert Rose.

Counsel assisting the inquiry, Joshua Jones, asked Supt Moller why he asked Sgt Rose to perform that task.

“The stress of the investigation affected a lot of police,” he said. “A number of police that worked for me, have been unable to return to work as a result of the stresses in this investigation and at the time.

“Detective Sergeant Rose was one person who hadn’t been involved in it before and because of a number of members going off sick, I brought him in to manage that process for us at that stage because we didn’t have anyone else because they’d gone off, they’d been sick.”

The inquiry heard that Covid lockdowns had made it hard to serve the summons on Mr Lehrmann, who was in Toowoomba, so arrangements were made for it to be served on his lawyer John Korn who was in Sydney and that the brief of evidence would also be served on him at this time.

The inquiry heard that on August 6, 2021 ACT police investigators put the summons and brief of evidence in the boot of their vehicle and drove to the outskirts of Sydney, where it was provided to AFP officers from their Sydney office.

However the receiving officers mistakenly left the brief in the boot and it was later provided to Mr Korn on a USB stick.

“Now, you’ve given evidence earlier that it would be unusual to serve a brief directly on defence counsel outside your procedures. Why was it done in this case?,” Mr Jones asked.

Supt Moller said they had circumvented their ordinary processes “because there was a need to get it all done” as per Mr Chew’s direction.

“He absolutely didn’t need to give me an extra explanation,” he said.

“I was aware, I was living the pressures at the time. I knew the exceptional amount of pressure on us to get this done and I knew the pressure that was on him as well so he didn’t have to explain it to me.

“If you were involved in environment at that time, you would appreciate how difficult it was.”

After the brief was served on Mr Korn, (Shane) Drumgold emailed police on September 17 asking them to explain why they had provided the brief directly to the defence.

Mr Drumgold raised that the Crown’s copy of the brief contained unlocked redactions, copies of Ms Higgins audio visual interviews and her counselling records.

Supt Moller conceded those items should not have been included in the brief provided to Mr Korn so called the defence lawyer and asked him not to access, open or view the files.

“And he gave me an undertaking that he would do that,” he said.

Mr Drumgold sought an assurance in writing, which Mr Korn provided.

The AFP’s digital forensic team later examined the USB stick and confirmed its contents had not been accessed or copied.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885212

File: 1932e5fed44b0e2⋯.jpg (117.88 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Detective_Superintendent_S….jpg)

File: 586967527e2c95c⋯.jpg (108.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Liberal_Party_staff….jpg)

>>18885211

2/4

Supt Moller also told the inquiry that it was necessary for police to conduct a second interview with Ms Higgins in May 2021 to clarify inconsistencies they had discovered during their investigation.

“We had a lot of concerns about the evidence that was being presented to us and we wanted to clarify some of the inconsistencies that we’d developed through the evidence,” he said.

“To conduct an extensive investigation or complete investigation, it’s incumbent upon us to look at these lines of inquiry and determine if there’s other lines of inquiry that fall out of them.

“For instance, Miss Higgins may have been able to justify one of them, and that may have supported her view and that may have given us another line of inquiry that we could have pursued to support that view.

“It’s incumbent upon us as investigators to do the most complete and comprehensive job we can and that’s what we try and do.”

Supt Moller said that while EICI’s can be potentially traumatic and stressful for complainants – and police held concerns for Ms Higgins’ mental health – it was important to clarify the evidence with Ms Higgins to ensure their investigation was thorough.

“We’re torn by trying to get the best possible evidence we can, but also we’re trying to support the complainant through this process,” he said.

“We’ve got to support and protect the (alleged) victim but we’ve also got an obligation to collect the … most thorough evidence we can to put before the courts.”

A couple of days after the second EICI, investigators provided a report to Commander Chew detailing all the evidence and what detectives had discovered during the investigation.

“Both supporting evidence and evidence that would detract from the complainant’s version,” Supt Moller said.

“It’s about ensuring that we’ve closed off every line of inquiry before that next step.”

Supt Moller said Ms Higgins persistently asked police to show her the CCTV footage from the morning of the alleged rape that captured herself and Mr Lehrmann entering and exiting Parliament House.

The senior officer said that detectives agreed to show her, during the second EICI, in an effort to “help her heal”.

“In a normal investigation, we would never show somebody evidence like that because it might influence their evidence later on in court, so we would never do it,” he said.

“Ms Higgins continually asked to be shown that video.

“So, troubled by that, we made a decision to show her but to show her on tape so we could capture the reaction … to make sure there could be no suggestion that we showed it for any other purpose.

“We should not show that evidence because it might taint it later on down the track but under a victim centric model, we go ‘well this is really important for her to see this’.”

Under examination by counsel assisting Joshua jones, Supt Moller agreed that it would have been more appropriate to have VOC Commissioner Heidi Yates explain to Ms Higgins that she could not watch the footage ahead of the trial because it might tarnish her memory.

Mr Jones said Ms Higgins had already expressed to police that her memory had been corrupted by speaking with journalists and because she had “blacked out” from intoxication on the night of the alleged assault.

“That was the dilemma that we had … she was so keen to see that and, you know, to help her healing process, so it was important to show her,” Supt Moller said.

Ms Yates has provided a statement to the inquiry claiming that after Ms Higgins’ second EICI Supt Moller spoke to the complainant in a harsh tone and warned her against continuing to speak to the media.

Supt Moller said he only vaguely recalled the meeting and rejects that he would have spoken to a complainant in a harsh tone.

“I don’t remember that conversation directly (but) I absolutely agree, I told Miss Higgins not to do any media,” he said.

“I told her that the media could influence the trial. I wanted her to stop doing media and absolutely 100% I agree with that.

“I can’t recall those words exactly and I can’t recall that meeting but certainly, the majority of those comments would be consistent with what I’d say.

“I don’t agree that I would have done it in a harsh tone.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885214

File: f4fb68a1d601b96⋯.jpg (109.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_said_she_….jpg)

>>18885212

3/4

Insufficient evidence to charge Lehrmann, inquiry told

Detective Superintendent Scott Moller told the eighth day of the Sofronoff inquiry that investigators should not have passed on Ms Higgins confidential counselling records to the DPP.

The inquiry heard that police delivered a partial brief and shared all of the information they had with Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold on June 21, 2021.

A week later Mr Drumgold advised police that, while he wanted them to pursue some further lines of inquiry, he believed there was sufficient evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann with sexual assault without consent.

Detective Superintendent Moller said it was the collective view of investigators that the evidentiary threshold to charge Mr Lehrmann had not been reached but he changed his mind after receiving advice from the DPP.

“I didn’t think there was enough evidence,” he said. “I received the director’s advice and certainly from his advice I decided to go ahead.”

Detective Superintendent Moller said investigators were under a significant amount of pressure from the public, the media and within the AFP to progress the investigation against Mr Lehrmann.

Detective Superintendent Moller said there was a real desire to “expedite” the investigation and “get Mr Lehrmann before the court”.

Before Mr Lehrmann was charged, Detective Superintendent Moller said he offered the opinion that the investigation should go through an adjudication process and for normal processes and procedures be followed, which would have required another week or so.

“It’s hard for me to articulate the amount of pressure on us at the time,” he said.

Superintendent Moller said that his investigators still did not believe they had met the evidentiary threshold to charge Mr Lehrmann so he signed the summons himself.

“I swore the summons because I did not want to put any of my staff in the position where they had to do something they didn’t want to do, didn’t believe in, so I did it,” he said.

“I didn’t think there was enough evidence and then I received the director’s advice and certainly from his advice, I decided to go ahead.”

The senior officer said that based on the DPP’s advice he accepted that the statutory test for charging was satisfied but that he believed that it was an “incredibly low” threshold being met in that only a suspicion was required to charge Mr Lehrmann.

Investigators feared Drumgold was ‘collecting evidence’ against them

Detective Superintendent said he became concerned ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold SC was collecting evidence against him and his investigation team.

Inquiry counsel assisting Joshua Jones on Monday showed Detective Superintendent Moller an email he received from Mr Drumgold in which the chief prosecutor asks him to answer a number of questions about the handling of the brief of evidence, including to whom and how it was delivered.

Detective Superintendent Moller said he became quite concerned Mr Drumgold was collecting evidence to support criticism of investigators and said he and his team started second-guessing themselves.

“I felt like … Mr Drumgold or the DPP was attempting to collect evidence against the police for use at a later time to show criticism towards police,” he said.

“I had that feeling very early on, to be honest it caused me quite a lot of concern for myself and my investigation team.

“So much so we continually second guessed ourselves about what we were doing and how we were doing it.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885217

File: 523d9b89fe5a774⋯.jpg (113.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>18885214

4/4

Brittany Higgins warned over media statements

Detective Superintendent Scott Moller says he warned Ms Higgins not to do anymore media because it could influence the trial of Mr Lehrmann.

Detective Superintendent Moller denied he told Ms Higgins in a harsh tone and told the Sofronoff inquiry he couldn’t recall the exact words he used but said he definitely warned the former ministerial staffer against doing any more press.

“I absolutely agree I told Ms Higgins not to do any media,” he said.

Detective Superintendent Moller said investigators showed Ms Higgins CCTV footage of the evening leading to the alleged rape despite concerns it would corrupt her evidence because they’d adopted a victim centric approach towards the investigation.

“That was the dilemma we had really we had to be honest,” he said.

“But it was so important from supporting a victim, supporting her [Ms Higgins]…. she was so keen to see that [CCTV footage] and you know, to help her healing process it was important to show her.”

Detective Superintendent Moller said in a normal investigation police would not show a witness evidence but because Ms Higgins continually asked to see the CCTV footage investigators ultimately decided to let the former ministerial staffer watch the footage while she was being recorded to capture her reaction.

Police ‘forgot’ to provide Lehrmann’s lawyers with legal brief

AFP investigators forgot to give Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyers a copy of the brief evidence when they served the summons to appear, the inquiry has been told.

Detective Superintendent Moller said investigators delivered the summons on the outskirts of Sydney due to concerns about bringing Covid into the ACT when they returned to the territory.

Detective Superintendent Moller said he later received a phone call from John Korn, who then represented Mr Lehrmann, asking for the brief of evidence, prompting him to make inquiries.

“What happens was we took the summons but forgot the brief of evidence,” he said.

Detective Superintendent Moller said AFP Commander Michael Chew had given a direction to “get it all done” due to the intense pressure on investigators to expedite the investigation.

Detective Superintendent Moller said a number of officers had gone on sick leave during the investigation and had yet to return to work.

“A number of police who worked for me have been unable to return to work due to the stresses of investigation,” he said.

The inquiry continues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/insufficient-evidence-to-charge-bruce-lehrmann-with-rape-of-brittany-higgins-scott-moller-tells-inquiry/news-story/41dc944913e79fbafe887186e50f6fb6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885225

File: cad12a3a916cef7⋯.jpg (112.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_Aus….jpg)

File: 3af86d77d64332e⋯.jpg (124.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_and….jpg)

>>18860427

>>18876521

Vacuous Quad joint statement sets off warning bells

PETER JENNINGS - MAY 21, 2023

1/2

The best that can be said of the statements, declarations, compacts and media transcripts from Anthony Albanese’s meetings in Hiroshima is that they make a thin gruel.

We now have a Climate, Critical Minerals and Clean Energy Transformation Compact with the US, which President Joe Biden was gracious enough to ­declare “the third pillar of the Australia-US alliance”.

The Joint Statement says: “Australia and the United States support a global energy transformation, including in the Indo-Pacific, that realises the economic opportunity in climate action through good, well-paying jobs while protecting the environment, accelerating the transition to net zero, and delivering affordable energy to businesses and households.”

Who knows what this really means? If the other two pillars of the alliance are the 1951 ANZUS Treaty and the 2021 AUKUS agreement, it’s clear that the Climate Compact has a long way to go to deliver on substance.

What has made the Australia/US alliance so successful has been a record of practical defence and intelligence co-operation, decisions that put boots on the ground and bullets in the armouries of our defence forces.

There was very little of that on display in Albanese’s engagement with Biden. The President saw the G7 meeting as serious enough to justify the travel. What is equally obvious is that a gossamer-thin Climate Compact didn’t merit an extra 24 hours overseas. No substance means no visit.

Perhaps the most useful thing in the exchange was that Biden has agreed “to ask the United States Congress to add Australia as a domestic source” in American defence production. This will “streamline technological and ­industrial base collaboration, accelerate and strengthen AUKUS implementation”. Albanese said he raised it personally with Biden last March in San Diego.

All credit to Albanese if he has secured Biden’s support in dealing with Congress. Then again, one could be forgiven for thinking that smoothing out these road bumps was what was supposed to have happened in the 18-month AUKUS planning phase that ended last March.

Close connections between the country’s political leadership remains vital to delivering AUKUS. That’s why getting Biden to visit Australia was an ­important objective.

A joint statement of the Quad leaders was released following a short meeting shoe-horned ­between the end of the G7 and a formal dinner. It’s a disappointing piece of work with a lot of bureaucratic verbiage and distressingly little substance.

Believe it or not the Quad statement doesn’t mention Russia. The statement expresses “our deep concern over the war raging in Ukraine and mourn its terrible and tragic humanitarian consequences”, but the invader and perpetrator of these terrible human rights abuses is not named.

The Quad statement raises concerns about “challenges to the maritime rules-based order, including those in the East and South China Seas”, but Beijing is not mentioned as the source of “destabilising or unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion”.

Warning bells rang for me about the essential vacuousness of the Quad joint statement when paragraph 5 began with: “Today we reaffirm our consistent and unwavering support for ASEAN centrality and unity.” Any statement that incorporates the ­pretence of fealty to ASEAN centrality has spent too long on the hands of diplomatic drafters. Quad leaders should be warned to keep meeting agendas away from officials, otherwise the lack of substance will end the enterprise.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885228

File: 4620053614ca85d⋯.jpg (88.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18885225

2/2

Albanese was questioned about the Quad’s lack of substance on China, compared with the strong language critical of ­Beijing in the G7 communique.

The Prime Minister’s responded: “We have said for some time that China’s activity, and we expressed concern for ourselves as well, the chafing of one of our aircraft, the other activities that we’ve seen has provided concern. We’ve expressed concern in the past, we’ll continue to do so.”

Immediately following the May 2022 election, Albanese asserted his international policy authority with strong language against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and pledges to stand up for Australian interests against bullying from Beijing.

Now Albanese talks in veiled terms about “the lack of guardrails that are there in international relations” and calls for the “status quo when it comes to the Taiwan Straits”. By contrast, the G7 statement issued in Hiroshima offers a much plainer assessment of the need for “de-risking and diversifying” away from Beijing.

Lost in the paper storm was a statement from Albanese and Penny Wong titled “Australia Stands with Ukraine and the G7 against Russia’s invasion”.

A handful of Russian com­panies and individuals have been added to the sanctions list with a plan to “implement a ban on the export of all machinery and ­related parts to Russia and areas temporarily under Russian ­control”.

Note though that at a time the G7 was contemplating additional support for Ukraine, Australia has put nothing on the table beyond a “tribute to the unwavering resilience and courage displayed by the Ukrainian people”.

Is it clearer now why Biden saw no good reason to come to ­Australia?

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/vacuous-quad-joint-statement-sets-off-warning-bells/news-story/9f9d3b3f167dcf932df295038c82b666

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885235

File: 5e250ecffa320fa⋯.jpg (25.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australia_s_Prime_Minister….jpg)

File: 15bc45c1f488bda⋯.jpg (93.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,Japan_s_Prime_Minister_Fum….jpg)

>>18876521

>>18885225

PM goes soft on Russia, China as other leaders step up to the mark in support of Ukraine

MICHAEL SHOEBRIDGE - MAY 22, 2023

1/2

Australia’s attendance at the G7 and Quad leaders meetings in Japan helps Anthony Albanese back home. It portrays him as a respected, influential international leader. But the price of sitting at these tables isn’t smiling and participating in photo opportunities, it’s action – and that’s where the problems can often start.

The G7 did serious work on supply chain security, managing the economic risks from international inflation and climate change, and Australian contributions were straightforward. But both the G7 and Quad also focused on managing a more aggressive China and supporting Ukraine in the face of Vladimir Putin’s brutal war. Both are fraught territory for the government.

On Ukraine, Australia has moved from an active, front-foot supporter of President Volodymyr Zelensky and his military to a country desperate not to be asked what it has done lately. And on China, the clear Australian government objective is to not create a ripple in the monster’s pond. Its approach is that nothing can be allowed to disturb the glacial lifting of Beijing’s coercive trade restrictions. Even more importantly, nothing must get in the way of the headline: “Albanese meets Xi”.

But keeping very still and hoping other leaders make the running is a path to Australia having less influence and presence at future G7 meetings. More practically, in becoming part of the slow-moving crowd that provides grudging support to Ukraine, Australia can help create what Putin is banking on and the Ukrainian people fear: waning Western support as they fight a grinding war against Russia.

The contrast between Australia and Japan here is sobering. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida used his position as host of the G7 to put Ukraine at the middle of the agenda, including through Zelensky’s surprise trip to Hiroshima. His government is bringing seriously wounded Ukrainian soldiers to Japan for treatment.

Kishida also ensured Beijing’s economic coercion would feature strongly in the G7 work plan, and stepped up to hold a Quad leaders meeting when the Sydney meeting fell over. Albanese provided old news. On Ukraine it was stale reminders of now dated support to Ukraine. On China, it was all about letting others say anything remotely critical of Beijing’s authoritarian directions and their adverse consequences for security and prosperity. While in Hiroshima, he told us Putin’s war and the troubled global economy were reminders “that none of us, even those island continents like Australia are islands when it comes to dissociating ourselves from the global economy and from global events”.

Stirring stuff, but engagement is more than meetings and rhetoric, it’s about substance. So it would be a good use of his flight home for our PM to push his bureaucracy, and the bigger one over at Russell Hill, to put together a new, substantial package of military support for Ukraine, and do so with urgency. A new support package could include: 100 more Bushmasters; 100 Hawkei smaller off-road vehicles, useful as missile launch platforms, and; drones and counter-drone systems from small Australian companies such as EOS, Defendtex and C2 Robotics. He could also offer our recently retired F/A-18 fighter jets, now the constraints on providing US fighter aircraft are lifting.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885236

File: 58e41f69c3b2e87⋯.jpg (160.09 KB,1280x720,16:9,Russian_President_Vladimir….jpg)

File: cd3429129c193fa⋯.jpg (161.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,Quad_leaders_meeting_on_th….jpg)

>>18885235

2/2

None of this would reduce our own security, and this package would provide very practical military hardware the Ukrainian military needs to push the Russians back. In parallel, as he contemplates the implications of his China policy, Albanese has to find a way out of being wedged by Xi Jinping as the price for pausing economic coercion. The problem is that by October or November, when Albanese hopes to shake Xi’s hand, Xi will have made further hard line moves. By then his emerging security-driven crackdown on foreign firms will have had real human consequences – such as arrests of foreign citizens. Xi’s military will be intimidating the Taiwanese people during their presidential election campaign, and seizing more control in the South China Sea from countries such as Vietnam.

Meanwhile, the EU, Japan, G7 and the US will all have further developed their approach to de-risking their economic relationships with China, going in the opposite direction to current Australian China policy. So, Australian policy is to re-risk our economic relationship with China right when our partners are de-risking theirs.

Xi will want Albanese’s visit to showcase how well he is managing foreign policy and to demonstrate that his repressive moves are problem-free. He’ll want Albanese to talk about economic opportunities to prop up the illusion of Chinese “reform and opening up” against the nastier reality of increasing control and coercion. Doing so will dent Albanese’s credibility with allies and partners, just as French President Emmanuel Macron’s poorly chosen words did during his visit with Xi last month.

Depending on how much Albanese realises is at stake, and how willing he is to push reluctant officials, we might look back on the 2023 G7 and Quad leaders meetings as the high water mark of Australian influence on security and countering Beijing’s economic coercion. That would leave shaping our security and prosperity to others. We can and should do better.

Michael Shoebridge is director of Strategic Analysis Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/pm-goes-soft-on-russia-china-as-other-leaders-step-up-to-the-mark-in-support-of-ukraine/news-story/070cd1667d646bb4d6f5790be240cf17

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885246

File: e326e0bce7e9b52⋯.jpg (72.01 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Mila_Antonova_discussed_pl….jpg)

File: 4e30e02c2f9287d⋯.jpg (668.98 KB,3000x2535,200:169,Jeffrey_Epstein_s_sex_offe….jpg)

>>18805504

>>18875740

Epstein threatened to reveal Bill Gates’ ‘affair’ with young Russian

David Millward - May 22, 2023

1/2

Washington: Jeffrey Epstein threatened to expose Bill Gates over an alleged affair with a Russian bridge player in her 20s, according to reports in the US.

Convicted paedophile Epstein, who killed himself in jail in 2019, wanted Gates to support a charity he had set up.

Gates, 67, refused to do so, and Epstein threatened to expose the alleged affair unless he co-operated, The Wall Street Journal reported.

“Mr Gates met with Epstein solely for philanthropic purposes,” a spokeswoman for the Microsoft co-founder said.

“Having failed repeatedly to draw Mr Gates beyond these matters, Epstein tried unsuccessfully to leverage a past relationship to threaten Mr Gates.”

She added: “Mr Gates had no financial dealings with Epstein”.

Gates met Antonova at a bridge tournament

The technology billionaire was a keen bridge player, having learnt the game from his parents, and he met Mila Antonova, who had founded a bridge club in the Bay Area, at a tournament in 2010.

She described their encounter in a video. “I didn’t beat him, but I tried to kick him with my leg,” she recalled.

Antonova then proposed a venture in which she would offer online bridge lessons.

Epstein was seen as a potential investor and she was introduced to him by Boris Nikolic, a Gates confidant and top science adviser.

Ultimately, Epstein declined to invest in the project, BridgePlanet, following their meeting at Epstein’s townhouse in November 2013.

Instead, Antonova became a computer programmer, with Epstein picking up the cost of her training.

“Epstein agreed to pay, and he paid directly to the school. Nothing was exchanged. I don’t know why he did that,” she told the Journal.

“When I asked, he said something like, he was wealthy and wanted to help people when he could.”

She has declined to comment on Gates and added she did not know who Epstein was when they met.

“I had no idea that he was a criminal or had any ulterior motive. I just thought he was a successful businessman and wanted to help,” she said.

“I am disgusted with Epstein and what he did.”

Having made the introduction to Antonova, Nikolic also held discussions with Epstein over his plans to set up a charitable fund worth billions of dollars with JPMorgan.

According to court papers, seen by The Wall Street Journal, Epstein saw the fund – which required a minimum $US100 million ($150 million) donation from individuals – as a way of rehabilitating his reputation.

But the perceived support of Gates was crucial for the venture to succeed.

In his typo-ridden messages to potential backers, Epstein made much of Gates’ potential involvement.

“In essence this [fund] will allow Bill to have access to higher quality people, investment, allocation, governance without upsetting either his marriage or the sensitivities of the current foundation employees,” Epstein wrote on August 16, 2011 to two top JPMorgan executives, Jes Staley and Mary Erdoes.

It was not until 2017 that Epstein made the threat in a letter to Gates asking to be reimbursed for the cost of Antonova’s course.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885251

File: e9414292f61a63b⋯.jpg (2.1 MB,4995x3323,4995:3323,Bill_Gates_has_said_it_was….jpg)

>>18885246

2/2

Epstein implied he was ready to expose the affair

In the letter he implied he knew of the affair and was ready to expose it.

Associates said the amount of money demanded was not significant, it was the thinly veiled threat which mattered.

Gates, whose net worth exceeds $100 billion, met Epstein more than half a dozen times.

He was one of a number of prominent individuals who Epstein sought to cultivate as he tried to restore his reputation after his initial sex offences conviction in 2008.

Gates, who was also a passenger on Epstein’s private plane, has since said his calls and meetings with the disgraced financier were a mistake.

Nikolic has also voiced his sadness at ever encountering Epstein.

“I deeply regret that I ever met Epstein,” he said. “His crimes were despicable. I never saw anything like his illegal behaviour. My heart goes out to his victims and their families.”

He added: “I should never have associated with him – and now I am thankful that he never invested in my endeavours.”

The proposed charitable fund failed to materialise.

“The firm didn’t need him as a client,” a JPMorgan spokesman said of Epstein. “The firm didn’t need him for introductions. Knowing what we know today, we wish we had never done business with him.”

Epstein was first accused of sexually abusing girls as young as 14 in 2006. He pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution.

He was arrested again on sex trafficking charges in 2019 and was found hanging in a prison cell while awaiting trial.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/epstein-threatened-to-reveal-bill-gatess-affair-with-young-russian-20230522-p5da4o.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885282

File: e8c91deeb4f24c9⋯.jpg (133.78 KB,1280x720,16:9,President_Donald_Trump_and….jpg)

File: 841efb3ff0d08bf⋯.jpg (115.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Special_Counsel_John_Durha….jpg)

File: d95a89ab486bd84⋯.jpg (64.68 KB,768x1024,3:4,Alexander_Downer.jpg)

>>18855229

Biased FBI, complicit media failed US democracy in pursuit of Donald Trump and Russia election hoax

ADAM CREIGHTON - MAY 22, 2023

1/2

Meteorologist Edward Lorenz once contended that a butterfly flapping its wings could ultimately cause a tornado in some other part of the world.

Whatever its truth in science, the release of the much-anticipated Durham report in the US has laid out in shocking detail how a conversation between former Australian foreign minister Alexander Downer and Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos, in a London wine bar in 2016, led to the greatest case of election interference in US history.

A highly politicised FBI seized on a vague paragraph, provided by the Australian government, that indicated Papadopoulos had said Russia could help the Trump campaign with the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton.

The FBI didn’t interrogate the information and ignored its own team of expert Russia analysts, but chose to launch Operation Crossfire Hurricane in July 2016, a full-scale investigation into alleged links between Donald Trump and the Russian government, seemingly with the intent to grievously and baselessly harm Trump’s reputation and his chances of winning the 2016 election.

“Neither US law enforcement nor the intelligence community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation,” special counsel John Durham concluded.

His 300-plus-page report describes in stark detail how the FBI – supposedly an impartial federal law enforcement agency – became a tool of the Democratic Party, and more specifically the Clinton campaign, producing the fraud that eventually became the Russia collusion hoax. Even Downer himself, the report states, later revealed “there was no suggestion that there was collusion between Donald Trump or Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russians”.

At the time British intelligence officials “could not believe the Papadopoulos bar conversation was all there was” to the case. “The FBI discounted or wilfully ignored material information that did not support the narrative of a collusive relationship between Trump and Russia,” the report said. “At a minimum, confirmation bias played a significant role in the FBI’s acceptance of extraordinarily serious allegations derived from uncorroborated information that had not been subjected to the typical exacting analysis employed by the FBI.”

The FBI investigation led to the Mueller inquiry, which extended the political smear, while coming up with zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia when it was publicly released in 2019. And there still isn’t any seven years later.

Russian meddling in US political discourse in 2016 had nothing to do with the Trump campaign. Yet the twin investigations fuelled a devastating media frenzy for the Trump administration. For years, powerful CNN and MSNBC hosts, together with their print journalist enablers, slammed Trump’s supposed links to Russia. It became almost a religion.

Incredibly, in July 2016, a few days before the FBI launched its probe, director of national intelligence John Ratcliffe shared with president Barack Obama and vice-president Joe Biden intelligence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign was planning to smear Trump by linking him to separate Russian efforts to interfere with the election.

“No FBI personnel … interviewed by the special counsel recalled Crossfire Hurricane personnel taking any action to vet the Clinton Plan intelligence,” the report states. “This stands in sharp contrast to its substantial reliance on the uncorroborated Steele Reports, which at least some FBI personnel appeared to know was likely being funded or promoted by the Clinton campaign,” it added, referring to the fabricated report by former British spy Christopher Steele.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18885287

File: 0bd9c715a185a8f⋯.jpg (119.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Hillary_Clinton_and_Bill_C….jpg)

File: cc208ed0ce77eb1⋯.jpg (546.77 KB,852x967,852:967,Q_2433.jpg)

File: 271313f3991ab62⋯.png (32.23 KB,652x309,652:309,PapaD_11_5_18_11_09_pm_PST.PNG)

>>18885282

2/2

If that’s not enough evidence of institutional bias, in 2014 the FBI shut down four potential probes into Hillary and Bill Clinton following evidence the FBI received about a foreign actor seeking to “contribute to Hillary Clinton’s anticipated presidential campaign, as a way to gain influence with Clinton”. Nothing happened, one agent said, because “everyone was super careful … they were ‘tiptoing’ around HRC because there was a chance she would be the next president”.

The two FBI officers critical to launching the Crossfire investigation, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, were texting each other throughout 2016: “(Trump’s) not going to become president, right?!” Page said, to which Strzok replied: “No, he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

For all the gravity of the Russia collusion hoax, the report has been dismissed or ignored by much of the US mainstream media, some of whom won Pulitzer prizes for validating it. The crime was assumed, but the evidence was never forthcoming.

“The people who are criticising it are the people who perpetrated the big lie, and advanced that false narrative, peddled it to the American people, doing immense damage to our country, to our institutions,” former attorney general William Barr (who commissioned the Durham report) observed last week.

Democrat claims that Republicans sought to influence elections by insisting on voter ID or in-person voting pale in comparison to this tacitly co-ordinated hit job on a presidential candidate, which in effect amounted to accusing him of treason without evidence. Indeed, the crime of tapping a phone at the Watergate Hotel seems a trifle by comparison.

And the same institutions, more or less, suppressed and dismissed the true story about Hunter Biden’s laptop, which could have been devastating to Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign. Those who have been screaming loudest about misinformation and disinformation have ended up being the greatest purveyors of it.

Whatever Trump’s flaws and his later misdeeds, he didn’t deserve this, and his supporters are right to be furious.

The damage done to US society and governance will be profound and enduring. A future Republican administration, with some justification, may well gut the FBI as retribution. If it was a theory before, the weaponisation of federal agencies is now a fact.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/biased-fbi-complicit-media-failed-us-democracy-in-pursuit-of-donald-trump-and-russia-election-hoax/news-story/a6a263bb14731becabb13aedd7bf411a

https://web.archive.org/web/20181106071536/http://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1059704187255062528

https://qanon.pub/#2433

>This is not a game.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890046

File: dce5692d315dcf8⋯.jpg (96.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 847718aa6b5e7f6⋯.jpg (105.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: 57c4d1d26eca3e7⋯.jpg (134.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Affairs_Ministe….jpg)

>>18676743

Indigenous voice to parliament battlelines have been drawn and there is no nuance and very little goodwill on both sides of the debate

DENNIS SHANAHAN - MAY 23, 2023

Anthony Albanese has gone “all in” on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government referendum and offered nothing, not a crumb of consolation, to those with genuine concerns seeking some compromise.

The debate is set, the battlelines, drawn so long ago, are unchanged and there is a fateful air of a bruising and bitter debate to come.

The unaltered plan for a referendum recognising Indigenous Australians and including a new chapter to create an Indigenous voice to parliament has begun its inevitable and unchangeable course through parliament.

The die is cast for an October referendum question, which the Prime Minister has supported and wanted from the beginning and which has no concession for even the fervent supporters of the voice who fear it will fail because of overreach and a lack of real debate and explanation.

We know there were concerns expressed about the extent of interference from the voice in daily decision-making of government, even within the Indigenous working group; we know genuine supporters of a voice who fervently want it to succeed fear it will fail if not changed; and we know that Albanese pleaded with critics in parliament to join the process and declared he was “open” to what the parliamentary committee ­decided.

Yet as of Monday we now know there will be no change – the working group’s final decision on advice to executive government was accepted by cabinet; the government-run parliamentary committee brooked no change; and Albanese has sought no different path.

As the formal Yes campaign begins with the referendum questions being put to parliament, the political reality is that there is no political bipartisanship; there is increasing personal acrimony; public polls show declining support for the referendum; and Albanese and Peter Dutton have huge political investments in the outcome.

Albanese maintains the Opposition Leader can’t win politically because if the referendum fails, he will be blamed for damaging Indigenous interests and reconcil­iation; if it succeeds, he will be deemed irrelevant.

Dutton argues Albanese is being “tricky” in hiding the true impact of the voice on executive government behind an emotional “vibe” appealing to the “overwhelming wish” of Australians to see recognition for Indigenous people.

“This Prime Minister refuses to provide even the most basic of detail on the voice model,” he told parliament on Monday and declared “details should come before the vote, not the vote before the details”.

The Minister for Indigenous Australians, Linda Burney, ­described Dutton’s approach as “disinformation and misinformation” and said it was right to ­include executive government ­because that’s where the decisions were made and that the referendum was both “symbolic – and ­practical”.

Both sides have put their arguments, both sides will continue to do so and the absence of any compromise means there will be no nuance in the debate and little goodwill.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/no-nuance-in-this-debate-and-little-goodwill-from-all/news-story/6b3a09677702c721bf6d11951e7af4d1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890054

File: fbc750a0db79185⋯.jpg (87.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

File: 433638cceafdd1b⋯.jpg (89.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,Michaelia_Cash_and_Peter_D….jpg)

File: 798a3de2b021916⋯.jpg (230.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,Greg_Craig_and_Mark_Agius_….jpg)

>>18676743

A strong Indigenous voice to parliament is a sign of ‘healthy democracy’

KATIE O’BRYAN AND PAULA GERBER - MAY 23, 2023

The shadow Attorney-General Michaelia Cash has asserted that the voice to parliament is divisive and breaches discrimination laws. She is wrong. Seeking to overcome the systemic discrimination Indigenous Australians face, is entirely consistent with our racial discrimination laws.

As the former chief justice of the High Court Robert French has noted: the voice is not about race, but rather “rests upon the historical status of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as Australia’s Indigenous peoples”. Indeed, the Australian Race Discrimination commissioner, Chin Tan, says the voice to parliament will lead to less racism and will promote equality, not inequality.

This is based on the fact that “denying Indigenous Australians a voice in decisions that affect them will only serve to maintain racial inequality and continue the marginalisation and disempowerment of First Nations people”. Thus, rather than breaching our race discrimination laws, the voice will help to prevent discrimination and alleviate inequality.

The voice to parliament is also consistent with our international law commitments, including in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Convention of the Elimination of All forms of Racial Discrimination.

The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples recognises the right of Indigenous people to “participate in decision-making in matters which would affect their rights, through representatives chosen by themselves in accordance with their own procedures” and governments must consult with Indigenous representative institutions “before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them”. The voice is doing no more than this. It is not giving Indigenous Australians any power to veto laws and is not a “third chamber”, as critics such as Scott Morrison have claimed.

Senator Michaelia Cash also says that the voice will embed “superior rights” in the Constitution. Again, she is wrong.

The voice does not create special rights or breach discrimination laws. Rather, it gives Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples a permanent mechanism by which they can put their views to parliament and the executive government. The constitutional amendment does not require parliament or the executive government to act on those views. All Australians have the right to make representations to parliament, which is guaranteed by the constitutionally implied freedom of political communication. Indeed, there are lobbyists who arguably enjoy very privileged access to members of parliament and who can put forward their views with much less transparency than would be the case for the voice. The secrecy that shrouds federal lobbying undermines democracy, whereas the voice will enhance democracy.

The Constitutional Expert Group, comprising nine experts (including former High Court judge Kenneth Hayne) has confirmed that the “draft amendment is constitutionally sound” and does not amount to a “veto” power or provide anyone with “special rights”.

As it currently stands, our constitution does not protect equality and actively allows for racially discriminatory laws by virtue of s 51 (xxvi) (the race power). Further, the race power has only ever been used to make laws for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, laws which are not required to be beneficial laws.

It is only fair that First Nations peoples be entitled to put forward their views to the parliament and executive government when such laws are being developed.

Cash’s claim that the voice to parliament will be divisive does not stand up to scrutiny. The voice will help to unite our nation because it will be a major step towards reconciliation. A successful referendum on the voice will mean that the Australian people have emphatically said that they want parliament to listen to First Nations people. It will be an acceptance of the invitation in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, to walk together for a better future.

There are people who disagree with the idea of the voice, and who will disagree with representations the voice might make. That is nothing to fear. A healthy democracy relies on the ability of people to be able to express their views, particularly on matters which affect them. The voice to parliament merely facilitates Indigenous Australians expressing their views on laws that affect them. It does not prevent others from expressing their views.

Professor Paula Gerber and Dr Katie O’Bryan are both experts in human rights law at Monash University and specialise in Indigenous legal rights.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/a-strong-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-is-a-sign-of-healthy-democracy/news-story/feccb8bc1e617468233110c9e3a5bc5f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890059

File: 6ffee9004c86c67⋯.jpg (137.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,_Emerging_from_an_extensiv….jpg)

File: ac6732ac65fe1f8⋯.jpg (109.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,Marcia_Langton_and_Tom_Cal….jpg)

File: 314360ecc7edfa2⋯.jpg (145.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Pat_Anderson_is_an_Alyawar….jpg)

File: 502cd62748f0f0a⋯.jpg (120.82 KB,768x1023,256:341,Anthony_Albanese.jpg)

>>18890054

Why I believe First Peoples will thrive with an Indigenous voice to parliament

TOM CALMA - MAY 23, 2023

The Uluru statement – with its central call for a voice to parliament – is at its heart a practical document.

There is urgency and pragmatism to the proposal that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should have a say in the way policies and programs are made for us at the federal level. Few can argue the status quo is working.

The Uluru statement describes the removal of our children, the languishing of our people in detention and the torment of our powerlessness in the face of these chal­lenges. But, most important, it crystallises how we can make a practical difference, how we secure the lasting change that all Australians of goodwill, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, want to see.

Emerging from an extensive national engagement with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, the Uluru statement calls for a constitutionally enshrined voice as the way forward. It is a simple proposal: that better decisions, better policies, better implementation and better laws are made when the people whose lives they affect are active participants in these processes.

Now we have a government committed to a referendum that can make this a reality. The first step is the passage of a Constitution alteration bill through parliament. The bill was introduced in March and was recently scrutinised by a cross-party committee.

Across six public hearings, the committee heard from First Nations and non-Indigenous people across the country about why a constitutionally enshrined voice was fundamental to improving practical outcomes for Indigenous people and communities.

Marcia Langton and I appeared before the committee as co-chairs of the 2021 Indigenous Voice Co-Design report. We shared that the voice would be a worthy addition to our public life, that it would improve government decision-making and would recognise First Peoples in the Australian Constitution.

The committee began with evidence from Uluru statement architects Megan Davis and Aunty Pat Anderson, who provided a timely reminder on the promise and potential of the voice for communities: it is about getting grassroots voices amplified and feeding into Canberra, representing the views and voices of their communities.

The committee then travelled to Cairns, where it heard from stakeholders across northern Queensland and the Torres Strait.

At hearings in western NSW, Orange Local Aboriginal Land Council chief executive Annette Steele, appearing in a private capacity, told the committee how a voice could elevate grassroots solutions to youth education and employment: “If there was a voice, or when there is a voice, I would see that it gets to look at what actually works on the ground. There is a direct link from our local communities straight to the voice, saying: ‘This is what works for us. This is what’s working in our community.’ ”

When the committee travelled to Western Australia, it heard from a range of prominent West Australians, including former Liberal ministers for Indigenous Australians Ken Wyatt and Fred Chaney and former Australian of the Year and eminent public health researcher Fiona Stanley, who told the committee that health outcomes simply improved when Aboriginal people had greater say and control.

The message is clear: when Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have a say in the matters that affect our communities, we get better outcomes. We are but months away from the referendum for a voice.

It is a pivotal moment. This referendum holds the promise of recognition and the potential of real practical change for communities.

We must embrace this opportunity. The voice is our great next chapter, our hope for a better future.

Tom Calma is a member of the referendum working group and co-author of the Calma-Langton report.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/message-is-clear-first-nations-will-thrive-with-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/d5ae037ba0c398b415fbc4e3aab18779

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890066

File: 252e827d806fbb2⋯.jpg (117.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Detective_Superintendent_S….jpg)

File: 586967527e2c95c⋯.jpg (108.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Liberal_Party_staff….jpg)

File: f4fb68a1d601b96⋯.jpg (109.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_said_she_….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18885147

Sofronoff inquiry: Police ‘acted hour after boyfriend’s call’

STEPHEN RICE, KRISTIN SHORTEN and REMY VARGA - MAY 23, 2023

1/2

The police officer in charge of the investigation into Brittany Higgins’s rape allegations has revealed the immense pressure investigators were under to charge Bruce Lehrmann, culminating in a direct phone call from her boyfriend, David Sharaz, to a senior detective threatening to publicly condemn the time being taken.

Detective Superintendent Scott Moller gave evidence to the Sofronoff inquiry on Monday that within an hour of Mr Sharaz calling Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, he was given ­instruct­ions to serve a summons on Mr Lehrmann for one count of sexual intercourse without consent.

Superintendent Moller agreed that at the time the decision was made by his boss, Commander Michael Chew, investigators were faced with “the potential threat of Ms Higgins going public about the delay”.

Detectives were under so much pressure to progress the case against their professional beliefs that many went on stress leave, Superintendent Moller said.

He confirmed that as The Australian reported last year, police did not believe there was enough evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann but agreed to do so after receiving advice from ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold.

Superintendent Moller said his investigators did not believe they had met the evidentiary threshold to charge Mr Lehrmann so he signed the summons himself.

“I swore the summons because I did not want to put any of my staff in the position where they had to do something they didn’t want to do, didn’t believe in, so I did it,” he said.

“I didn’t think there was enough evidence and then I received the director’s advice and certainly from his advice, I decided to go ahead.”

Superintendent Moller also revealed Ms Higgins was allowed to watch CCTV footage of herself and Mr Lehrmann at Parliament House because she was “so keen to see it” - even though it could have corrupted her evidence - as police felt obliged under their ­“victim-centric” approach to show it to her.

Superintendent Moller said Ms Higgins “continually asked” to see the footage, which showed the pair exiting and entering Parliament House on the night Ms Higgins claims Mr Lehrmann raped her on a sofa in senator Linda Reynolds’s office.

“In a normal investigation, we would never show somebody evidence like that because it might influence their evidence later in court,” he said.

Superintendent Moller agreed to a suggestion by counsel assisting, Joshua Jones, that Ms Higgins had expressed to police that “her memory had been corrupted” by speaking with journalists.

“Wearing our investigators’ hats, we go: ‘No, we should not show that evidence because it might taint it later on down the track’. But under a victim-centric model, we go ‘Well, this is really important for her to see this, we’re trying to support her’.”

Mr Jones: “Ms Higgins had expressed on a number of occasions that she’d had a lot to drink and had blacked out and by showing her that video footage, you risked corrupting her evidence about that section of the night?”

Superintendent Moller: “Yes, and that was the dilemma that we had, to be honest. That was the issue that we had but it was so important for supporting the victim, she was so keen to see that and to help her healing process that it was important to show her.”

On June 28, 2021, the DPP provided advice to ACT Policing that there was sufficient evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann but before making their final decision, police sought to have their investigation reviewed by officers who were not involved in the matter.

Before the review could occur, an article was published on news.com.au on July 29, 2021, in which Mr Drumgold denied his office was delaying the case after AFP Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw wrongly indicated during a National Press Club address the matter was still with the DPP.

Mr Drumgold told the website he had provided his advice on whether charges should be laid a month earlier and any decision on whether to arrest and charge Mr Lehrmann lay with the police.

The day that the article was published, Mr Sharaz emailed Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates to ask “What’s going on? We’re reading this news about it. Is a decision going to be made as was forecast in the July 12 ­meeting?”

Police had previously told Ms Higgins that they expected a decision would be made by the end of July.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890070

File: 977809a34bf5337⋯.jpg (107.53 KB,768x1024,3:4,Brittany_Higgins_partner_D….jpg)

File: 523d9b89fe5a774⋯.jpg (113.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>18890066

2/2

On July 30, Ms Yates forwarded the email from Mr Sharaz to Inspector Boorman who informed Superintendent Moller of the email. A short time later, Mr Sharaz called Inspector Boorman and indicated that Ms Higgins planned to release a media statement critical of how long police were taking to charge Mr Lehrmann.

“9.30am further briefing with Inspector Boorman re Higgins,” Superintendent Moller recorded in his police diary at the time.

“Discussion re Higgins contemplating media release due to recent media statements by Commissioner AFP and DPP.”

Superintendent Moller then informed Commander Chew about Ms Higgins’s possible media statement.

“Travel to Brisbane next week to talk with Higgins and serve summons on Lehrmann for one count of sexual intercourse without consent,” Superintendent Moller wrote in his diary of his instructions from Commander Chew. “Chew further said start preparing the summons now in preparation for your travel based on legal provided by DPP.” Mr Jones put it to Superintendent Moller that when police made the decision to serve the summons, they were dealing with negative press, the threat of Ms Higgins going public about the further delay and incorrect public comments by their commissioner.

“In the office, around the time of charging, there was immense pressure,” Mr Jones suggested.

“Yes, well throughout the whole part of the investigation, but yes, it culminated at this time,” Superintendent Moller replied.

Mr Jones: “And here, the commander on the 30th is directing to get the summons served?”

Superintendent Moller: “Well, he says preparations for the summons to be served, yes.”

Mr Jones: “But he’s saying to you, isn’t he? ‘Get the summons ready, go up to Brisbane’ … and he is making the decision to charge in light of the pressure that’s on him?”

Superintendant Moller: “No, I think that’s a little bit unfair – he’s making the decision to charge based on, you know, the brief evidence that has been provided.”

In other evidence, Superintendant Moller said he believed it was necessary for police to conduct a second interview with Ms Higgins in May 2021 to clarify inconsistencies they had discovered during their investigation.

“We had a lot of concern about the evidence being presented to us and we wanted to clarify some of the inconsistencies we’d developed through the evidence,” he said. “We’re torn by trying to get the best possible evidence we can, but also we’re trying to support the complainant through this process.

“We’ve got to support and protect the (alleged) victim but we’ve also got an obligation to collect the … most thorough evidence we can to put before the courts.”

Superintendent Moller also conceded that Ms Higgins’s con­fidential counselling notes were wrongly provided to Mr Lehrmann’s previous lawyer but said ordinary processes had been circumvented “because there was a need to get it all done”, following instructions from Commander Chew.

“I was aware, I was living the pressures at the time,” he said.

“I knew the exceptional amount of pressure on us to get this done and I knew the pressure that was on him as well so he didn’t have to explain it to me.

“If you were involved in that environment at that time, you would appreciate how difficult it was.”

Superintendant Moller also acknowledged that his Executive Brief on the case, which has become known as the Moller Report, referred only to problems found with Ms Higgins’s account of events and did not raise doubts about the plausibility of Mr Lehrmann’s version.

However, Superintendant Moller said that other documents available to Commander Chew did question aspects of Mr Lehrmann’s account, and that all the ­issues had been the subject of constant discussion.

“Every day for a year and a half we were talking about this matter, so we were talking constantly about this; I was briefing Commander Chew and I was being briefed … nearly every day,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/insufficient-evidence-to-charge-bruce-lehrmann-with-rape-of-brittany-higgins-scott-moller-tells-inquiry/news-story/41dc944913e79fbafe887186e50f6fb6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890091

File: 8a17da4cb9ea323⋯.jpg (96.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Prosecutio….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18885147

Shane Drumgold lost objectivity in Bruce Lehrmann rape case, Sofronoff inquiry told

KRISTIN SHORTEN and REMY VARGA - MAY 23, 2023

1/4

The senior police investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation got the impression that Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold was determined to prosecute the case, “no matter what” and was “dismissive” of investigators’ views, an inquiry has heard.

During his second day of evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller said that Mr Drumgold had been verbally expressing his view that there was sufficient evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann “for months” before he had read the brief of evidence.

Mark Tedeschi KC, who is representing Mr Drumgold, asked Supt Moller about his knowledge of a meeting between Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman and Mr Drumgold to discuss Bruce Lehrmann’s case on March 31, 2021.

“The team were of the view that Mr Drumgold, and this is what they’ve expressed to me, that Mr Drumgold had a position where he was going to prosecute this matter no matter what, basically,” he said.

“The briefings I had was that Mr Drumgold was committed to prosecute this matter.

“It was something that had been discussed numerous times in the office.”

As a result, Supt Moller and Insp Boorman sought permission to obtain independent legal advice about Mr Lehrmann’s prosecution.

“I wouldn’t say it was because of that but I would agree that we wanted to seek independent legal advice,” he said.

“It was because I felt, and certainly from the briefings I’d had, that Mr Drumgold had lost objectivity in this matter.

“I thought it was best practice to get supplementary advice at that stage.

“Independent legal advice was something that I believed was a good strategy to make sure that we were presenting the best possible matter before the court should we go there.

“So my view is independent legal advice is a good process, and it’s something that the AFP undertakes with very high profile matters.”

Supt Moller said Mr Drumgold had not provided written advice at that stage but had been verbally expressing his view “for months”.

On May 27, 2021, Supt Moller met with Commander Michael Chew and sought his authorisation to get independent legal advice, but his request was declined.

“The chief police officer and the deputy chief police officer had basically turned you down?” Mr Tedeschi said.

Supt Moller confirmed that “they didn’t agree with my submission”.

“Which is something that regularly happens,” he added.

June 1, 2021 meeting with DPP

The inquiry heard that Insp Boorman and Supt Moller met with DPP director Mr Drumgold and prosecutor Skye Jerome on June 1, 2021.

“And during that meeting … you tried to convince the DPP that there was insufficient evidence to proceed against Mr Lehrmann by detailing to the DPP all of, what you thought were the deficiencies and discrepancies in the evidence of Ms Higgins,” Mr Tedeschi said. “Is this what happened?”

Supt Moller said Insp Boorman ran through all of the evidence that police had collected with the prosecutors.

“I’d certainly agree that I highlighted weaknesses, absolutely would agree with that,” he said.

“I spoke about the potential issues that I thought were in the brief of evidence.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890093

File: e0b28bb1666cdbb⋯.jpg (119.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,Detective_Superintendent_S….jpg)

>>18890091

2/4

Mr Tedeschi said Mr Drumgold requested the entire brief and contents of Ms Higgins’ phone, and explained the tests for deciding if there was a reasonable prospect of conviction.

Supt Moller said Mr Drumgold expressed his preliminary view that “this matter is going to go to trial” and asked police to send him the brief “as quick as you can” so he could review it.

“I didn’t agree that Mr Drumgold should be making an assessment of this matter prior to actually reading the brief,” he said.

“I was concerned that the investigation wasn’t significant enough to move forward with the prosecution and I was worried that Mr Lehrmann could potentially be placed before the court when we didn’t believe there was enough evidence.

“And I was trying to convey that, like the other investigators did to Mr Drumgold, who continually over many months dismissed our propositions about this matter.”

Supt Moller said that despite this, once Mr Drumgold provided his written advice, police were “absolutely committed to this prosecution”.

“And trying to find the truth of matter,” he said.

June 17, 2021 diary note

Mr Tedeschi has also cross-examined Supt Moller about his diary notes from June 17, 2021 in which he recorded Commander Chew telling him that the DPP had recommended charging Mr Lehrmann, and his own belief that there was “insufficient evidence to proceed”.

According to the diary notes, Commander Chew told him: “If it was my choice, I wouldn’t proceed but it’s not my choice. There is too much political interference.”

Mr Tedeschi asked Supt Moller what he understood Commander Chew to mean by “political interference”.

“Well, I guess you’d have to ask him, but my view was that there was a lot of pressure on him and they were the words that he used. I wasn’t aware of any political interference,” he said.

“The collective pressure, pressure from within the police force, pressure from outside the police force, the collective pressure inside, outside, the pressure from DPP, the pressure from the media, you know, that’s how I interpreted what he had said to me.”

Supt Moller said he believed Commander Chew’s decision that “we should go ahead” was based on a combination of advice from the DPP and the “collective pressure” he was under to progress the matter.

“It was disappointing to me that it was going ahead when I thought there was insufficient evidence,” he said.

“Specifically when I thought there was insufficient evidence.

“He (Commander Chew) supported the view of the DPP. He was prepared, whatever his own views were, to take the advice of the DPP.”

The inquiry heard that 11 days later, on June 28, the DPP provided written advice that there were “reasonable prospects of conviction”.

Supt Moller said that by August 6, 2021 when the summons was served on Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers, he had accepted the DPP’s advice and was “absolutely committed” to the prosecution.

However, he signed the summons himself because his team had not formed the view that the threshold had been met to charge Mr Lehrmann.

“I think a better summary of that is that the team weren’t comfortable progressing the prosecution at that time,” he said.

“Certainly after reading the (DPP’s) advice, I was of the opinion that we should go ahead, and the team held a view that they weren’t at that threshold yet to go ahead.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890095

File: a12f2ec2957694a⋯.jpg (154.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_Victims_of_Crime_Commi….jpg)

>>18890093

3/4

Supt Moller agreed it was “absolutely unusual” for an officer as senior as a superintendent to sign a summons and that he had not signed one since joining the AFP.

But in Monday’s evidence he said he signed the summons because he did not want to ask his investigators to do something they did not believe was right.

Moller report

On June 3, the investigators were still of the view there was insufficient evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann. That day Supt Moller finalised his report and forwarded it to Commander Chew.

Supt Moller conceded that he did not include analysis of Ms Higgins intoxication level, her capacity to consent to sex or corroborative evidence of sexual intercourse in his report.

Mr Tedeschi accused Supt Moller of deliberately omitting corroborative evidence of sexual intercourse taking place between Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann because the only corroborative evidence he included was Ms Higgins being found in the ministerial suite in a state of undress.

“Executive briefings are supposed to be kept at a maximum of two pages. They are a summary for our executive to understand the issue that we’re trying to articulate,” he said.

“So trying to (condense) a year and a half of investigative work into two pages, firstly, was very difficult.”

Supt Moller said his two-page executive briefing was attached to the entire brief of evidence, which included all of the evidence collected to date.

“These were the pertinent things that were in my mind at the time that I thought my commander needed to be aware of, as well as all the other things that I’d been telling him for the last 12 months in our verbal briefings,” he said.

“So if there’s something that I’ve omitted from this (executive briefing) document, I’d accept that.”

Supt Moller says he was disappointed when he was told charges would be laid against Mr Lehrmann despite investigators believing there was insufficient evidence to proceed.

Supt Moller said he had a meeting with AFP Commander Michael Chew on June 17 in 2021, in which Commander Chew told him the DPP had recommended Ms Higgins’ allegations be prosecuted.

Supt Moller said he understood the DPP’s recommendations was the only reason the charges would be laid against Mr Lehrmann.

“The view was we would go ahead, that was disappointing to me. It was disappointing to me it was going ahead due to insufficient evidence.”

Supt Moller denied there was political pressure on police to lay charges against Mr Lehrmann.

Higgins contacted media ‘quite often’

Mr Moller says Ms Higgins disavowed warnings to stop talking to the media and continued contacting journalists “quite often”, including after the jury in the high profile of Mr Lehrmann was discharged.

Mr Moller said he was concerned by Ms Higgins continuously airing evidence in the media and said the former ministerial staffer did not follow his warnings to desist.

“She contacted the media quite often,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890096

File: ab22da43ed40985⋯.jpg (107.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_strenuo….jpg)

>>18890095

4/4

Lehrmann charge ‘fractured police, DPP relationship’

The decision to charge Mr Lehrmann over the alleged rape of Ms Higgins fractured the relationship between police and the DPP as investigators were concerned about the presumption of innocence amid insufficient evidence to substantiate charges.

Supt Moller said the investigators did not believe charges should be laid against Mr Lehrmann and they were worried about the former ministerial staffer appearing in court, despite the DPP believing charges should proceed.

“There was certainly a fracture in the relationship,” he said.

“I think Commissioner [Walter Sofronoff KC] because the investigators’ view was it shouldn’t go ahead.. they were concerned for the presumption of innocence [and] they were worried about putting Mr Lehrmann before court when there wasn’t enough evidence.”

Supt Moller said the relationship between investigators and the DPP became strained after detectives received advice from the DPP that the case against Mr Lehrmann should proceed.

Supt Moller said Mr Drumgold’s advice on the case satisfied him there was sufficient evidence for the matter to proceed.

“When I read Mr Drumgold’s advice for me I was satisfied that was sufficient to move forward,” he said.

‘Inappropriate’ support for Ms Higgins

Investigators were “concerned” about the Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates “inappropriately” acting as the complainant’s support person and that the senior public official made it hard for them to do their job.

Supt Moller denied during cross examination that he was “frustrated” that Ms Yates had placed herself as an intermediary between Ms Higgins and the police.

“Not exactly. Did it cause us concern? Yes, it did. Was it difficult? Yes, it was,” he said. “But in saying that we were working through those issues so no, I don’t agree with you.”

But Supt Moller, admitted during cross examination by Sydney silk Mark Tedeschi KC who is representing Mr Drumgold SC, that Ms Yates’ level of involvement in the case made their job “difficult”.

“I thought a commissioner, head of an agency, working as a support person was inappropriate,” he said.

“From my observations, the investigators appeared to be nervous when they’re interacting with Ms Yates.

“They weren’t comfortable and certainly the feedback I had … certainly the process was more difficult in that they couldn’t communicate freely.

“They felt, often, that Ms Yates was speaking for Ms Higgins and not allowing Ms Higgins to speak.”

Supt Moller said he had never observed the Victims of Crime Commissioner to become “so personally involved in a matter” before Ms Higgins’ complaint and had never needed to take a statement from her in any other case he had worked on.

“I have never been involved in a matter like this with Ms Yates so I’ve never had the opportunity or the need to do that,” he said.

“Again, I’ve never had the head of an agency, the commissioner of another agency, involved as a support person in a sexual assault matter.”

Supt Moller compiled the investigative review document, informally called the Moller report, that has become a key focus of the Sofronoff inquiry, which is probing the conduct of chief prosecutor Mr Drumgold in withholding it from Mr Lehrmann’s defence team.

In his 50-page statement to the inquiry, Superintendent Moller says that when he created the Moller report, it was an internal decision-making document; it was “never my intention” for the document to go to the DPP for legal advice, as the DPP has claimed, he says.

Superintendent Moller has been a police officer for more than 30 years.

The inquiry continues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-support-person-heidi-yates-inappropriate-sofronoff-inquiry-told/news-story/5f23867920ebe4852afaed50889c82c2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890103

File: 7cd773de3834e41⋯.jpg (129.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

File: fb9e0b456c930d4⋯.jpg (124.83 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australian_Defence_Ministe….jpg)

>>18875410

Maturity on China boosts our global status: Richard Marles

BEN PACKHAM - MAY 22, 2023

Australia is being treated “more seriously as a country” since the Albanese government ended the nation’s “shrill” political debate over China and began stabilising relations with Beijing, Richard Marles has declared.

The Defence Minister told News Corps’ Defending Australia dinner in Canberra on Monday night that China remained a “significant source of anxiety in respect of our national security”.

But, days after Anthony Albanese confirmed he had been invited for an official visit to Beijing, Mr Marles said Australia wanted to engage in a productive relationship with China, “because, quite obviously, China matters”.

“Today this is an uncontroversial statement to make. But a year ago it was a statement that brought populist condemnation,” he told the dinner at the Australian War Memorial.

Mr Marles, branded by Scott Morrison a “Manchurian candidate” prior to last year’s election, said the previous government issued “gratuitous and inflammatory comments” about China without regard for the interests of the Australian people.

“These actions made our already deeply complex relationship with China much harder,” he told the audience of military and defence industry chiefs, national security leaders and senior media figures.

Mr Marles’s speech was in stark contrast to that of Opposition leader Peter Dutton, who warned Australia should not be lulled into “wishful thinking” that deft diplomacy would convince China to play by global rules.

Mr Dutton called for the government to “find strength through speed” in the delivery of new weapons and military equipment.

Mr Marles noted China’s “significant human rights issues” in Tibet and Xinjiang, but also its successful growth story – “the single biggest alleviation of poverty in human history”.

He said every Australian had been a beneficiary of China’s economic success.

But the Deputy Prime Minister also pointed to China’s rapid militarisation – the biggest by any country since the end of WWII – which will see the nation’s naval fleet grow from six nuclear submarines and 57 surface ships in the year 2000 to 20 nuclear boats and 200 ships by the end of the decade.

“This is a massive expansion of the Chinese military and it is happening without any transparent explanation to the region or the world about its purpose,” Mr Marles said.

He said China’s construction of artificial islands to assert sovereignty over the South China Sea had “no basis in international law”, and was an issue of national interest for Australia due to the huge volumes of the nation’s trade that passed through that body of water.

“So when the entirety of the story around China is examined, it is complex. Managing the relationship is difficult. It cannot be done on fundamentalist terms,” he said.

“We are stabilising the relationship with China, without compromising our national interest and our sovereignty. And in the process we are being treated far more seriously as a country.”

The Albanese government was widely criticised over its failure to lift defence spending in the May budget, given the unprecedented strategic circumstances laid out in its Defence Strategic Review.

But Mr Marles, in his first major speech since the review’s release, said the government had made “difficult decisions” to reprioritise defence spending, setting the portfolio’s budget on a path to grow by 0.2 per cent by the end of the decade.

“This is a significant increase in Australia’s defence budget being delivered by a Labor government,” he said.

Mr Marles said defence spending would also have to respond to “grey zone” threats that fell short of actual war, and that the Department of Finance would work with the Defence Department to ensure high-quality spending.

“In a rational world, defence spending is a function of strategic threat and complexity,” he said.

“We face both of these in full measure. And we are rational people operating a rational government.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/marles-says-australias-relationship-with-china-is-deeply-complex/news-story/d44967f170a0b5d07f886cf0b402761d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890113

File: 1a31fda6ddbbf2d⋯.jpg (3.59 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Penny_Wong_says_Anthony_Al….jpg)

File: e3a568a1e6ed358⋯.jpg (59.85 KB,1024x576,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_met_with_….jpg)

>>18875410

Foreign Minister Penny Wong says prime minister won't visit China unless 'progress' is made

Stephanie Borys - 23 May 2023

Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong has indicated Prime Minister Anthony Albanese won't travel to China unless "continued progress" is made to resolve trade and consular disputes.

The invite from Chinese officials was made earlier this year and follows clashes between the two countries, which have in particular severely hindered Australian exporters.

China imposed trade sanctions on several items such as wine, rock lobsters, coal and barley in recent years which has cost exporters billions of dollars.

While some restrictions have been wound back there are still some bans in place.

Ms Wong suggested further progress on lifting trade sanctions was necessary before a visit to China could be scheduled.

"We have always had a principled and consistent position that all trade impediments should be removed," she told Senate estimates.

"We've seen some progress [on] coal, copper and timber, there's a process underway on barley and I, Trade Minister Don Farrell and the prime minister have made clear that we would want to see a similar pathway on wine.

"We will continue to press for the trade impediments to be lifted and obviously continue to engage in relation to consular cases.

"I would say that we would want to see continued progress and the most positive circumstances for any visit by the Prime Minister, and I think China would understand that."

Successive Australian governments have also pressed China on human rights violations in relation to Australian citizens being detained and Mr Albanese recently told reporters it was an issue he continued to raise with officials.

"The detention of Cheng Lei for example, hasn't even been able to speak to her children," he said in Japan on Sunday.

"That's not appropriate, we need transparency, Australia will continue to make representations to China on behalf of our citizens."

Shadow Foreign Minister Senator Simon Birmingham recently urged the prime minister not to travel to China until all trade issues were resolved.

"I think Australia does deserve to have absolute clarity that these trade sanctions are going to be lifted and that that clarity should be there before the Prime Minister entertains a formal state visit to Beijing," he told Insiders on Sunday.

On Monday, he pushed Ms Wong further on her comments and the minister reiterated change was part of the negotiations.

"Continued progress for the most positive circumstances for any visit [to China] by the Prime Minister," she said.

"Those are the words I'm using and I'm choosing them carefully."

Timing and further detail

Officials from the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet were pressed by Senator Birmingham about how the invite from China came about.

"The Prime Minister has received an invitation to visit China and that's been conveyed by senior Chinese officials in recent discussions," the department's Craig Chittick told Senate estimates.

Senator Birmingham asked whether planning was already underway in relation to the trip but Mr Chittick remained tight lipped.

"There's ongoing discussions between Chinese and Australian officials for a visit sometime in the future," he said.

After years of disputes around human rights, national security and trade, Mr Albanese has made it clear he will travel to China.

While in Japan over the weekend, he confirmed he had advised other world leaders.

"I've informed our partners that I do intend to travel to China at some time in the future," he said on Sunday.

"And that has been welcomed as well.

"You need dialogue to get understanding, and you also need dialogue to avoid miscalculations, which has been a concern."

If the visit goes ahead, it would be the first by an Australian leader since former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull travelled to China in 2016.

Mr Farrell visited China earlier this month and insisted there was goodwill on both sides to improve the trade relationship but insisted more work was needed.

"The issues didn't occur overnight and they're not going to be resolved overnight," he said earlier this month.

"What I'd like to come back to Australia with is a pathway to resolve all of those outstanding issues."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-22/continued-progress-necessary-before-china-trip-proceeds/102379096

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890116

File: 5b91cb6a69d9b08⋯.jpg (85.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_DJI_drone_flies_in_Shenz….jpg)

File: f8f9112efa7f28d⋯.jpg (97.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Michael_Pezzullo_Secretary….jpg)

>>18814613

DJI drone fleet grounded by Border Force amid links to Chinese military

NOAH YIM - MAY 23, 2023

The Australian Border Force has stopped using drones from a Chinese manufacturer under review by the Defence Department and black-listed in the US, Home ­Affairs chief operating officer Justine Saunders told Senate estimates on Monday.

“We have actually suspended the use of that capability,” she said in response to questioning from opposition home affairs spokesperson James Paterson.

“I actually issued a directive (last) week indicating that they are not to be used.

“We’ll be working with (the Defence Department) and other partners to satisfy ourselves as to the implications of the use of this technology before it is used.”

It comes after revelations ­earlier this month that the ­Australian Border Force had acquired 41 drones from Chinese military-linked manufacturer DJI since 2017 as part of a trial to explore ­expanding operational capability with remote technologies.

The Australian reported that the defence force was using hundreds of DJI drones, despite the company being black-listed by the US government late last year due to its links to the Chinese military.

The Defence Department this month suspended the use of drones and all other products manufactured by DJI for a six-month audit of high-risk technology. Senator Paterson raised concern that the Australian Border Force would be continuing to use the drones if not for his ­questioning.

“Don’t we need a more proactive approach in assessing cyber security and technology risks posed by companies like these so we’re not reliant on a question on notice being fired through the Senate?” he asked.

Home Affairs secretary ­Michael Pezzullo said he foresaw “more uniform or ubiquitously restrictive approaches” being considered internationally due to increasingly interconnected critical technologies.

“The question, I think, governments of all persuasions across democracies generally will have to confront is how direct they start to become in terms of saying here is a type of kit or type of technology that you will not use,” he said.

“I suspect we’re going to have to consider that approach more ubiquitously simply because the connectivity of devices, the ­connectivity of technologies, the way in which a drone, or camera, or some kind of imaging device could potentially beacon back or send its data back to a host server.

“But that said, we’re working through it very carefully and ­purposefully.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/dji-drone-fleet-grounded-by-border-force-amid-links-to-chinese-military/news-story/cd7588795403e2c2a01f3a96ca86ebe1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890139

File: 2ddec8c3ca9267b⋯.jpg (4.26 MB,5394x3596,3:2,ASIO_Director_General_of_S….jpg)

>>18422854 (pb)

>>18670474

ASIO agents embedded in Defence to protect AUKUS secrets from foreign spies

Matthew Knott - May 23, 2023

1/2

ASIO officers are being embedded within the Defence Department to help prevent foreign spies from stealing the highly prized nuclear-powered submarine secrets Australia plans to acquire under the AUKUS pact with the United States and United Kingdom.

At occasionally fiery Senate estimates hearings – where two Liberal senators were accused of playing “culture war” politics with national security to increase their popularity – ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess defended the agency’s decision to quietly disrupt several foreign interference plots rather than seek criminal prosecutions.

Burgess said ASIO was on the lookout for any threat to public safety or foreign interference associated with the upcoming Indigenous Voice to parliament referendum campaign, adding there was the possibility of “spontaneous violence” as debate over the issue intensifies.

Burgess described AUKUS as a “great shiny example of something that foreign intelligence services would like to get insights on”, raising the importance of ensuring the Australian Defence Force has the best possible security protections as the nuclear-powered submarine plan advances.

“It’s a new target that has received new attention from foreign intelligence services,” Burgess said.

“I have people embedded in the AUKUS team in Defence that actually help Defence with their security posture ... I’m confident Defence understand the threats to security and the job they have to do to manage that risk effectively.”

Attempts to access sensitive Defence information is a “constant” and “very persistent” threat, he added.

Former US spy boss Mike Rogers warned earlier this year that Australia would become an “even more attractive cyber target” because it is gaining access to nuclear-powered submarines, regarded as the crown jewels of the US military.

Australia is set to become just the seventh nation to have nuclear-powered submarines when the AUKUS plan, unveiled in March, comes into effect in the early 2030s.

Burgess came under questioning from Greens senator David Shoebridge over why overseas citizens involved in several foreign interference plots had been quietly removed from the country rather than charged under foreign interference laws that were introduced with much fanfare in 2018.

The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age revealed in February that a highly active “hive” of Russian spies posing as diplomats was dismantled as part of a sweeping and aggressive counter-espionage offensive by ASIO that saw the participants sent back to Russia.

Burgess also revealed in a speech earlier this year that ASIO had foiled attempts by two foreign powers to physically harm, and in one case even kill, Australian residents who were critics of those regimes.

No charges have been laid over that scheme, or a separate audacious plot by an unidentified foreign power to covertly recruit senior Australian journalists using the offer of an all-expenses-paid overseas study tour.

“What is the point of passing these [foreign interference] laws if we don’t prosecute a hive of spies when we find one?” Shoebridge asked.

“Am I right in saying you can plan to kill Australian citizens and members of the diaspora community and the risk you face in Australia is to have your visa cancelled?”

Burgess said that was “not a valid characterisation” of the way ASIO operates and criminal prosecution is just one tool the agency uses to prevent foreign interference and espionage.

Sometimes the mere act of “an ASIO officer flashing their intelligence badge and having a chat” to potential offenders can stop them from proceeding with a foreign interference attempt, he said.

Diplomats who are actually operating as spies will usually be forced to leave the country rather than face charges, he said.

“My focus is on dealing with the harm in the most effective way,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890147

File: e9ae003b2767dd7⋯.jpg (2.8 MB,6818x5152,487:368,Retired_admiral_Mike_Roger….jpg)

>>18890139

2/2

Burgess announced last year that foreign interference and espionage had overtaken terrorism as the nation’s major national security threat.

He said ASIO had not uncovered any planned terrorist attacks or foreign interference plots related to the Voice referendum but said the agency was monitoring the issue closely.

“Of course we always keep an open mind to that and we’re on the lookout,” he said.

“Unfortunately we do expect people, as they express their views and exchange their views online, that might inflame some people.

“There might be some protest and counterprotest and some of that might result in spontaneous violence.”

Most extreme views about the Voice posted online so far could be classified as “awful but lawful” he said.

Labor senator Nita Green, who chairs the legal and constitutional affairs legislation committee, said the hearings had “descended into nonsense” when Liberal senator Gerard Rennick tried to question Burgess about the risks of “gain-of-function” medical research such as that used at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, a focus for believers in the “lab-leak” theory of COVID-19’s origins.

Emergency Management Minister Murray Watt accused Rennick and fellow Liberal Party senator Alex Antic of playing “culture war” politics by trying to achieve a viral moment that appeals to their far-right supporters.

Burgess said about 70 per cent of ASIO’s current terrorism caseload was made up of religiously motivated extremism, which largely involves radical Sunni Islamists, and the other 30 per cent was ideologically motivated extremism, largely from neo-Nazis and similar groups.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/asio-agents-embedded-in-defence-to-protect-aukus-secrets-from-foreign-spies-20230523-p5danc.html

https://qalerts.app/?q=Adm+R&sortasc=1

https://qalerts.app/?q=rogers&sortasc=1

https://qalerts.app/?q=NSA&sortasc=1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890161

File: 2b3dee9cb25515e⋯.jpg (123.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,India_s_Prime_Minister_Nar….jpg)

File: 83ac8b5cc575098⋯.jpg (166.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,India_s_Prime_Minister_Nar….jpg)

>>18880118

>>18885225

Indian PM Narendra Modi wants ‘next level’ friendship with Australia

CAMERON STEWART - MAY 23, 2023

1/2

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has declared he wants to take the relationship with Australia to the “next level”, including closer defence and security ties to help ensure an “open and free” Indo-Pacific.

Mr Modi, who arrived in Sydney for his first bilateral visit in ­almost 10 years on Monday night, said the growing strategic challenges in the region made India’s partnership with Australia more critical than ever.

“I am not a person who gets satisfied easily,” Mr Modi told The Australian in an exclusive interview before his arrival.

“I have seen that Prime Minister Albanese is the same. I am confident that when we are together again in Sydney, we will get the opportunity to explore how we can take our relations to the next level. Identify new areas of complementariness and can expand our co-operation.”

Mr Modi, who last visited Australia in 2014, called Mr Albanese, who visited India in March, a “dear friend”.

He said the bilateral relationship was being nourished by the fast-growing Indian diaspora, which served as a “living bridge” between the two nations, bound in part by a shared passion for cricket.

He said that since his last visit the bilateral relationship has been “fundamentally transformed” by annual summits, an Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement, and the elevation of relations to a Comprehensive Strategic partnership.

“We have progressed significantly in the areas of defence, security, investment, education, water, climate change and renewable energy, sports, science, health, culture, among others” Mr Modi said.

“Our people-to-people contacts remain a strong pillar of our partnership. The Indian diaspora in Australia has increased over the past years. They are a living bridge. Even the game of cricket binds us, on and off the field.”

Mr Modi, alongside Mr Albanese, will address an expected crowd of 20,000 at Sydney Olympic Park on Tuesday night with many Indian Australians catching “Modi Express” buses from around the country to attend.

But Mr Modi, a Hindu nationalist, is also expected to attract protests from some members of the Indian Australian community opposed to his policies at home.

Mr Modi, who met Mr Albanese on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Hiroshima at the weekend, chose to continue with his bilateral visit to Australia despite the collapse of this week’s Quad Leader’s Summit in Sydney after US President Joe Biden pulled out.

Mr Modi instead joined a makeshift mini-Quad summit in Hiroshima with Mr Albanese, Mr Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida.

The Indian leader flew into Sydney on Monday from a summit in Papua New Guinea, where Prime Minister James Marape hailed Mr Modi as “the leader of the Global South” and a “big third voice for the small island nations” as China and the US compete for influence in the region.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890163

File: 43f464910be612b⋯.jpg (119.37 KB,1280x720,16:9,India_s_Prime_Minister_Nar….jpg)

>>18890161

2/2

The 72-year-old, who has been prime minister since 2014, said the Indo-Pacific faced strategic and other challenges, but he did not mention China.

India, and other members of the Quad, have this week played down the strategic challenges posed by China to avoid antagonising Beijing, which sees the grouping as a threat.

“The Indo-Pacific faces a number of challenges such as climate change, natural disasters, terrorism, security of the sea lanes of communication, piracy, illegal fishing among others,” Mr Modi said.

“India believes that these challenges can be addressed only through shared efforts.”

Mr Modi said he wanted India and Australia to push to realise the “true potential” of closer ­defence and security ties.

Australia has increased defence links with India in recent years, including joining the MALABAR joint naval exercises alongside India, the US and Japan.

“As two democracies, India and Australia have shared interests in a free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific. There is alignment of our strategic viewpoints,” Mr Modi said.

“The high degree of mutual trust between us has naturally translated into greater co-operation on defence and security matters. Our navies are participating in joint naval exercises. I am confident that there is merit in working together to realise the true potential in closer defence and security co-operation.”

He did not take a position on Australia’s decision to acquire nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS pact.

“This is entirely Australia‘s decision. They have briefed us about their assessment and the thinking behind their decision,” Mr Modi said.

He also denied that bilateral relations would be harmed by India’s refusal to criticise Russia – a major supplier of military equipment to India – over its invasion of Ukraine.

By contrast, Australia has been highly critical of Moscow and has supplied military equipment to Ukraine.

“An advantage of being good friends is that we can discuss freely and appreciate each other’s viewpoint. Australia understands India’s position and it does not impact our bilateral relationship” Mr Modi said.

During his two day official visit Mr Modi will meet Mr Albanese as well as business leaders and members of India’s 750,000 strong diaspora.

He said he hoped the visit would allow both countries to identify new areas of co-operation “be it new technology, clean energy, critical minerals, mining, cyber space, building resilient supply chains, movement of skilled professionals”.

Before arriving in Sydney, Mr Modi visited Papua New Guinea, where he met Pacific leaders as part of a push to foster closer ties to the region.

“We believe that there is great scope to work with Australia and other like-minded partners in assisting these countries in meeting the challenges they face,” he said. “We remain committed, individually and collectively, to work on the challenges of maritime security, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief.”

India will host the G20 forum this year, which Mr Modi said would bring “the voice of the Global South to the forum, who are the most affected by the decisions we take”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/indian-pm-narendra-modi-wants-next-level-friendship-with-australia/news-story/59824f6096ee38138fc991607d1171cb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890171

File: dff44de5e6c713b⋯.jpg (116.05 KB,1200x675,16:9,Former_US_Marines_pilot_Da….jpg)

>>18729172

Concerns secret classification of detainee blocked bail

Dominic Giannini - 23 May 2023

Senior lawyers argue the conditions faced by a former US fighter pilot accused of aiding the Chinese military are impeding his case for bail.

Daniel Duggan is facing extradition to the United States, where he will face charges of violating arms export laws and money laundering, which he denies.

Mr Duggan has been remanded in NSW's Lithgow prison for the past seven months while he awaits the outcome of the extradition request.

The Australian section of the International Commission of Jurists wrote to the NSW Corrective Services Commissioner raising concerns about how Mr Duggan was classified as a high-risk detainee, with documents about the classification withheld.

The letter said without the information about why he was classified as high-risk, he couldn't properly prepare a bail application.

The jurists stated they remained concerned an Australian citizen was being treated as a danger to the community despite facing non-violent charges.

"We are also concerned that his right to a fair hearing of his bail application may be compromised by the actions taken," they wrote.

Mr Duggan's wife Saffrine said the prosecution showed that the Australian legal system was being "weaponised against an Australian citizen at the behest of a foreign government".

She said redactions from documents about the details of the case showed a lack of transparency within the system.

"Nothing in them explains why an Australian citizen and father of six Australian children needs to be locked up in maximum security solitary confinement for seven months, while he tries to defend himself," she said.

Mr Duggan has complained about a lack of basic materials to keep him warm but a Corrective Services NSW spokesman said all inmates are supplied with appropriate bedding and linen.

A letter from NSW Corrective Services Commissioner Kevin Corcoran responding to Greens senator David Shoebridge said he approved the downgrading of Mr Duggan's security classification from extreme high risk in mid-December.

He said the prison was assisting with family visits and ensuring phone contact has been maintained and that additional contact with his wife had been approved the week before his mother's funeral.

Mr Duggan's lawyers say the attorney-general needs to take greater oversight of the case after complaints were made to the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security about his treatment and NSW Correctional Services about his conditions.

International criminal law expert Glenn Kolomeitz said any alleged inappropriate behaviour by intelligence and security agencies, or non-compliance with international human rights, were all matters for the federal attorney-general.

The attorney-general maintains the complaint to the inspector-general is a matter for Mr Duggan while prison conditions sit with corrective services.

Mr Duggan is a former US Marines naval aviator and flight instructor.

The US government says he "conspired with others to provide military training to the People's Republic of China relating to aircraft carrier approach and landing".

It's also alleged he provided military training to Chinese pilots in 2012 and conspired to launder payments for the services.

He has consistently denied the charges.

The Australian government is also working to strengthen its own national security laws in light of the case and revelations China had tried to poach Western military pilots.

A spokeswoman for Defence Minister Richard Marles said the government was working to put legislation in place to ensure there were no doubts about the obligations defence force personnel have to keep the nation's secrets.

There are a number of laws in place to prevent the sharing of national security secrets and providing military training.

https://thewest.com.au/politics/concerns-secret-classification-of-detainee-blocked-bail-c-10742653

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18890184

File: 9e8b8fefd03ab1f⋯.jpg (90.62 KB,1200x675,16:9,Donald_Trump_Jr_is_coming_….jpg)

>>18860803

>>18876675

Controversy dogs Donald Trump Jr’s upcoming tour

Ash Cant - May 22, 2023

Australians are calling for Donald Trump Jr to be banned from the country before his planned speaking tour.

Donald Trump’s eldest son will embark on a tour in July with dates in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, presented by Turning Point Australia.

In a video he shared to social media to announce the tour, Mr Trump Jr said he had been to Australia while he was in college.

“I absolutely loved it. Incredible country, amazing people, beautiful scenery,” he said.

However, not all of the “amazing people” in Australia want Mr Trump Jr to enter the country.

A petition that calls for him to be banned is gaining traction.

At 9.30pm on Monday, an online petition calling for his ban has more than 3400 signatures.

“I do not want this racist American here yelling his divisive politics at us,” wrote one person, adding that America is a “mess” and the “fascist laws” over in the US should not be accepted in Australia.

“I don’t want the hatred and the lies that the Trump family and MAGA spread in Australia,” another person wrote.

No stranger to controversy

Mr Trump Jr has promoted conspiracy theories widely, including ones relating to Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Soros and Joe Biden.

He was instrumental in his father’s bid to overturn the results of the 2020 election and promoted several conspiracy theories about the election.

“The best thing for America’s future is for @realDonaldTrump to go to total war over this election to expose all of the fraud, cheating, dead/no longer in state voters, that has been going on for far too long. It’s time to clean up this mess & stop looking like a banana republic!” he once tweeted.

He also once shared a meme associated with white supremacists and throughout COVID-19 promoted misinformation.

Following his father’s indictment earlier this year, he went on a rant on his podcast, called Triggered with Donald Trump Jr, and claimed the US government was “communist”.

“It’s so flagrant. It’s so crazed when even like the radical leftists of The Washington Post are out there saying it’s not really based on facts,” he said.

“If you don’t think that the weaponisation of the entire federal government against their political enemies, against the voters – half of the country approximately – as we’ve seen, if you don’t think that’s a problem, you don’t even belong in any position in government, let alone president.”

In a TV rant that was widely labelled as homophobic, he referred to Pete Buttigieg as “that gay guy” and insinuated he was only made Secretary of Transportation under Joe Biden to “check off a box”.

‘Keep him’

However, Mr Trump Jr appears confident that his fans will support him while he is on his tour.

“I have a huge fanbase in Australia and after speaking with some of them it’s clear the same disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture that’s crippled the US has clearly taken hold there,” he told the Daily Telegraph.

“It’s not good. It is the biggest existential threat we face in the West and is literally the decay of Western society,” he said.

In the replies to his video on Twitter announcing his trip to Australia some Americans were begging Australia to “keep him”.

“Just send him somewhere in the middle of your country,” someone suggested on Twitter, saying the world would be indebted to Australia for doing so.

However, a few people on the platform expressed excitement about the son of the 45th president of the United States coming to Australia, and said they had already booked tickets.

Tour topics

Mr Trump Jr will speak about “woke identity politics” and cancel culture, touching on how, in his opinion, Western societies are in decay.

Australia has a “great MAGA fanbase”, he said in his announcement video.

“I think they [Australians] saw their rights being infringed, the insanity that went on there around COVID, and they understand the existential threat to the West that’s taken root,” he said.

“The disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture that’s crippled so much of the US has just taken root there and we need to stop it.”

Tickets will start at $89 ($59 for students); however, if people wish to they can pay more for a VIP meet-and-greet package ($295), or a backstage pass ($495), which allows people to enjoy a champagne with Mr Trump Jr after the show.

https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/world/us-news/2023/05/22/donald-trump-jr-australia-tour/

https://www.change.org/p/stop-donald-trump-jr-getting-an-australian-visa

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18894975

File: e9a49b7017722f7⋯.mp4 (15.85 MB,640x360,16:9,Disgraced_entertainer_Rolf….mp4)

Rolf Harris, disgraced former entertainer and convicted paedophile, dies aged 93

Linton Besser - 24 May 2023

1/2

The family of disgraced former entertainer and convicted paedophile Rolf Harris has revealed he died nearly two weeks ago at the age of 93.

"This is to confirm that Rolf Harris recently died peacefully surrounded by family and friends and has now been laid to rest," a family statement read.

"They ask that you respect their privacy. No further comment will be made."

Harris's death was listed as both neck cancer and "fragility from old age".

The 93-year-old died at his home in Berkshire on May 10, but the death was only registered in the UK on Tuesday.

Once one of Australia's most famous celebrity exports — renowned as a television presenter, musician and painter — Harris was prosecuted in 2013 for indecent assault against girls and young women between 1968 and 1986.

A year later, convicted at London's Southwark Crown Court over 12 offences, he was sentenced to five years and nine months in jail. He was released in May 2017 on parole.

He briefly hit the headlines again in February 2019 when he was spotted near the grounds of a primary school near his home, prompting calls for his parole to be revoked.

Instead, he was counselled by authorities.

Boy from Perth became star of British TV

Harris was born in Perth, Western Australia on March 30, 1930, to parents Agnes and Cromwell Harris, immigrants from Cardiff in Wales.

His first creative pursuit was art, staging his first solo exhibition at the age of 16. His self-portrait was hung in the Art Gallery of New South Wales during the 1947 Archibald Prize.

He won the Claude Hotchin Art Prize for oil painting two years later.

Harris moved to the United Kingdom in 1952, drawing animations for the BBC, and gradually becoming a popular television personality.

He presented Rolf's Cartoon Club and Animal Hospital, and from 1967 through to the 1980s he anchored variations of The Rolf Harris Show.

In 1958, he married Alwen Hughes, and the couple had a daughter, Bindi, in 1964.

'Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport'

In 1960, Harris's hit song Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport rocketed to number one on the Australian charts and into the top 10 in the UK and the United States.

The song featured his famous wobbleboard — a flexible piece of hardboard he moved back and forth to produce what became a trademark musical effect.

Racist references to Indigenous people in the lyrics were removed from later versions of the song.

Harris expressed regret at using them, but courted similar controversy when, in 2008, he told Indigenous Australians to get "off their arse" to "clean up the streets" rather than complain about poverty.

In all, Harris recorded almost 50 singles and more than 30 albums throughout his career, with his version of Two Little Boys becoming his most successful single.

His musical career saw him perform at the Royal Albert Hall, the iconic Glastonbury Festival, and at the Queen's Diamond Jubilee concert in front of Buckingham Palace.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18894978

File: e6f89f0bfb3b5c1⋯.jpg (55.18 KB,612x459,4:3,Rolf_Harris_posing_with_hi….jpg)

File: b87c782d3b654f6⋯.jpg (510.61 KB,2016x1512,4:3,A_court_sketch_of_Rolf_Har….jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>18894975

2/2

A royal portrait painter and honours recipient

In 2005, Harris was commissioned to paint a portrait of Queen Elizabeth II — a sitting which was filmed as part of a BBC special — and the following year, he was made a Commander of the British Empire.

In 2012 he was made an Officer of the Order of Australia in the Queen's Birthday Honours list.

Harris continued to perform concerts right up until his criminal trial began. The main complainant was a childhood friend of Harris's daughter, Bindi.

She told the court Harris had first abused her during an overseas family holiday in 1978, when she was aged 13.

This was followed by a 10-year period in which he regularly assaulted her.

A 'sinister pervert' who 'groped and mauled' young girls

Harris admitted he had what he described as a 10-year affair with the accuser, but said it did not start until she was 18, and the relationship was consensual.

Although Bindi supported him in her testimony, claiming she was with her friend during the entire holiday when the assaults first began, the court would ultimately find Harris was lying.

The prosecution described Harris as a "sinister pervert" who had a "demon lurking beneath his charming character".

He was described as using "underage girls as sexual objects" to be "groped and mauled".

Harris alleged his victims were fabricating their claims. But the court upheld the evidence of the four complainants and six supporting witnesses, and found him guilty.

"You have shown no remorse for your crimes at all," Justice Nigel Sweeney told Harris as he handed down the sentence in October 2014.

"Your reputation lies in ruins, you have been stripped of your honours, but you have no-one to blame but yourself."

At age 84, the judge announced half of Harris's sentence would be non-custodial.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-23/disgraced-paedophile-rolf-harris-dies-aged-93/12371306

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18894986

File: 6da5d04d9c85382⋯.jpg (1.96 MB,5088x3392,3:2,Rolf_Harris_arrives_for_hi….jpg)

File: a261d5df1cca113⋯.jpg (770.08 KB,2640x1844,660:461,Rolf_Harris_meets_King_Cha….jpg)

File: 601824b1a117fa3⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,2923x2131,2923:2131,Rolf_Harris_with_his_famou….jpg)

>>18894975

Convicted paedophile Rolf Harris’ death may unleash new wave of allegations

Rob Harris - May 24, 2023

1/2

London: The multimillion-dollar estate of disgraced entertainer Rolf Harris is bracing for a flood of new claims and allegations against the Australian after his family announced his death from cancer in Britain.

Harris, who found stardom as a singer, painter and television presenter before he was convicted of 12 historical indecent assaults dating from 1968 to 1986, had worldwide hits with songs including Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport and Two Little Boys.

It was revealed on Wednesday he was cremated following a small funeral service and his death kept secret for almost two weeks after his health rapidly declined over the past year. The convicted paedophile died on May 10 at the age of 93, at his home in Bray, Berkshire, on the same day a private ambulance was photographed in his driveway.

His death certificate, released 13 days later, said he died from neck cancer and “frailty of old age”.

Lawyers claim Harris’ death could trigger a flood of civil claims against his estate which is estimated to be worth about £15 million ($28.15 million).

Fresh allegations against the sex offender have been aired as recently as March, when a Melbourne woman claimed she was assaulted 40 years ago after he performed at a camp at Mount Eliza on the Mornington Peninsula.

Alan Collins, a partner in the sex abuse team at Hugh James Solicitors, said that victims of sexual abuse battled with a psychological barrier over whether to begin the legal process of trying to hold their abuser to account and claim compensation.

“Rolf Harris’ passing could act as a trigger to many of his victims, reigniting the psychological trauma they battled with and providing them with a renewed incentive to seek justice and be rightfully compensated,” he said.

Harris’ legal team said they would still robustly defend any future or current claims against the entertainer and that the estate would seek full costs against any person bringing false claims.

A statement issued by his solicitor on behalf of the Harris family said: “This is to confirm that Rolf Harris recently died peacefully surrounded by family and friends and has now been laid to rest.

“They ask that you respect their privacy. No further comment will be made.”

Harris hosted television shows in Australia and Britain for more than 50 years, painted the late Queen’s 80th birthday portrait and was appointed CBE, MBE and OBE. Following his convictions, he was stripped of many of his honours.

It was revealed in October that Harris, who had become a recluse since being released from prison in 2017, was “gravely ill” with cancer and receiving around-the-clock care. He could no longer talk and had to be fed through a tube.

He is survived by his wife of 64 years, Alwen Hughes, 91, who has Alzheimer’s disease and has been wheelchair-bound for some years, and his only child, Bindi Harris, 59, who works as an artist.

Harris was jailed for five years and nine months in June 2014 following a trial at London’s Southwark Crown Court. He was found guilty of 12 indecent assaults, including an assault on an eight-year-old autograph hunter, assaults on two girls in their early teens, and a catalogue of abuse against one of his daughter’s friends that spanned more than 16 years.

During the trial, one victim said the abuse had destroyed her childhood innocence, while another said the assaults made her feel dirty, grubby and disgusting. Others described how they had struggled to move on, with one saying the abuse had haunted her.

“You have shown no remorse for your crimes at all,” the judge said in his sentencing. “Your reputation now lies in ruins, but you have no one to blame but yourself.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18894989

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18894986

2/2

A second trial in 2017 examined a further set of allegations. In that case, a jury found that Harris was not guilty of indecently assaulting a young autograph hunter when she visited him at a radio station in Portsmouth with her mother at the end of the 1970s; not guilty of groping a blind and disabled woman at Moorfields Eye Hospital in London in 1977; and not guilty of sexually assaulting a woman in her 40s after the filming of a TV show in 2004.

Later the same year, one of the 12 original indecent assault convictions was overturned by the Court of Appeal.

Harris had not spoken publicly since his release, but last year provided a statement for a book written by a private investigator, William Merritt, about the trial.

“I understand we live in the post-truth era and know few will want to know what really happened during the three criminal trials I faced – it’s easier to condemn me and liken me to people like [Jimmy] Saville and [Garry] Glitter,” the statement read.

“I was convicted of offences I did not commit in my first trial. That is not just my view but the view of the Court of Appeal who overturned one of my convictions. It is difficult to put into words the injustice that I feel.”

A new documentary on British television last week aired more allegations against the convicted sex offender, including that Harris warned his daughter Bindi’s friend – whom he was abusing – to “tread carefully” because he was powerful and wealthy.

The program, Rolf Harris: Hiding In Plain Sight, claimed Harris led a toxic double-life, molesting contributors and crew on the shows he worked on for years, with his assaults becoming gradually more serious throughout his successful television career in the 1970s and ’80s. This public persona of a non-threatening eccentric who was devoted to his wife ran counter to a view within the entertainment industry that Harris was known as “a creep”.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he was thinking of survivors of sexual abuse in the wake of Harris’ death.

“My thoughts are with victims who, for today … it will be a day in which traumatic experiences could be revisited,” Albanese told ABC TV according to AAP.

“I hope that they – if they need support – reach out and they get it today.”

Born in Perth, Western Australia, in 1930, where he was a junior swimming champion, he moved to London in 1952 to study art. He released 30 studio albums, two live albums and 48 singles in his career, which included recording with The Beatles. Two Little Boys, an American Civil War song, was the Christmas No.1 in the UK charts for six weeks in 1969.

In 1982, he performed at both the Victorian Football League grand final at the Melbourne Cricket Ground and the opening ceremony of the Brisbane Commonwealth Games.

Harris enjoyed a renaissance in the 1990s through a cover version of Led Zeppelin’s iconic Stairway to Heaven, which reached No.7 in the British charts and led to his appearance at the Glastonbury Festival in 1993. Harris appeared at six subsequent Glastonbury festivals –1998, 2000, 2002, 2009, 2010 and 2013 and performed at the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee concert in 2012.

Support for victims of abuse is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), as well from Lifeline on 13 11 14.

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https:// www. theage. com. au/ world/ europe/ convicted -paedophile -rolf- harris- dead- aged- 93- 2022 1006- p5b nmv. html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU2rN-mh2A4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18894995

File: 2492e2f68a3c028⋯.jpg (83.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,Scott_Morrison_says_the_vo….jpg)

>>18676743

Scott Morrison rejects ‘ill-defined, risky’ Indigenous voice to parliament with ‘no limits’

ROSIE LEWIS - MAY 24, 2023

1/2

Scott Morrison has denounced the Albanese government’s proposal for an Indigenous voice to parliament, warning it will have unconstrained and untested constitutional powers that will permanently create different rights for Australians based on race.

In his first public comments outlining his position in detail, the former Liberal prime minister delivered a complete rejection of the government’s voice model, saying it created “significant” constitutional risk, had been poorly constructed and was ill-defined.

Mr Morrison also claimed the permanent change to the Constitution – which would establish a voice that can make representations to the parliament and executive government – would “sadly not change the desperate circumstances being experienced in so many indigenous communities across Australia”.

“I understand that is the hope of this proposal, and hope is a good thing, but hope disappointed will be crushing to the soul, and such disappointment can be reasonably foreseen by proceeding with the government’s proposal,” Mr Morrison told the House of Representatives.

“Once established, the voice cannot be removed by the parliament, as proved necessary when the Aboriginal and Torres Islander Commission became dysfunctional and was rightly and successfully abolished by the parliament.

“As a constitutional body, the voice will also have constitutional powers that have not been tested before, and can never be constrained. This is a big deal. It constitutes a major change to our Constitution, with far reaching implications, many of which are not yet known, and importantly will not be known at the time Australians are asked to vote.”

His comments marked a rare intervention in the political debate since he lost the prime ministership in May last year.

Mr Morrison said there had been many successful remedial initiatives in the past that had sought to recognise Indigenous Australians and address the injustices and inequalities they face – such as the 1967 referendum, Mabo decision, creation of the Native Title Act and national apology – but insisted the voice proposal was “fundamentally different”.

Agreeing with Peter Dutton, who earlier this week said the voice model would permanently divide Australians by race, Mr Morrison said the proposed changes would permanently create “different rights for one group of Australians over others, based solely on race”.

“The impact of the voice on the operations of executive government and the parliament are also not known, presenting significant and unknown risks, that cannot be easily remedied, if at all,” Mr Morrison said.

“It is ill-defined, creating significant constitutional risk. Ultimately the High Court will be left to decipher the unknown and decide what this will all mean, long after Australians have cast their vote, with no further say.

“This will inevitably lead to confusion and uncertainty over everything from our national defence to the operations of Centrelink, which will all fall within the ambit of the voice. There are no limits.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18894998

File: 3f19e74b8aa136b⋯.jpg (77.04 KB,768x1024,3:4,Mr_Morrison_pictured_with_….jpg)

>>18894995

2/2

Labor MP Marion Scrymgour, who spoke after Mr Morrison in the second reading debate on the government’s Constitution Alteration Bill, accused the Morrison government of putting the voice in the “too-hard basket” and savaged any suggestion Indigenous Australians wanted to be heard through the voice to parliament because of their race.

Ms Scrymgour, whose mother was a Tiwi Islander and father was a member of the Stolen Generations, said the government’s proposed constitutional amendment was “modest” and would ensure Indigenous Australians could “properly speak for our country and our issues”.

“The starting point for everything is respect. People aren’t asking to be heard because they’re from any particular race, the racial characteristics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is a complete red herring,” she said.

“In the Northern Territory, particular groups of Aboriginal people are asking to be heard because since time immemorial they’ve had obligations to a particular part of this continent. And their culture and traditions are bound up with living at that place.

“It is disgraceful that people use that as a means to create doubt and division in the hearts and minds of people. I get that there are Australians who have already made up their minds and will vote No. No other Australian has the same obligation and responsibilities. If something’s going to happen that will affect Tiwi Islands and the people living there, they want to be able to speak about it to government. Not just as Australians but as Tiwi. No matter where you go, on whichever group’s country, the sentiment will be the same.”

Ms Scrymgour said the voice was a “convenient word for saying ‘let the right people talk’” and the proposal for the new section to be inserted into the Constitution was “simple but powerful”.

“People do not feel that they’ve been listened to for who they are and the current political system does not have the bandwidth to properly register the nuance and context of that grievance. This referendum is a major step towards fixing that for this country,” she said.

Mr Morrison lashed the Albanese government’s “failure of process” and the lack of constitutional convention to ensure unintentional consequences could be remedied before Australians vote.

“The government also refuses to consider any changes to their proposal that would minimise these risks. This not only reflects a failure of process, but imposes the government’s model on the Australian people, rather than listening, responding and uniting,” Mr Morrison said.

“I consider that the government’s proposal to permanently change the Constitution, while positively motivated, is poorly constructed. It presents serious risks, both known and unknown, to the operations of the executive government and our parliament, upon which all Australians depend.

“Such deficiencies cannot be overcome by good intentions and sentiment. It also fundamentally breaks one of our nation’s most important principles - that as Australians we are all equal, and that none of us are any more Australian than any other.”

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has often criticised the Morrison government for being too slow in developing a voice to parliament, which the Coalition said it would create through legislation with local and regional bodies set up first, followed by a national voice.

The Coalition put no legislation to parliament before the last election.

A new government-funded website outlines a timeline of significant events that have led to the referendum, which is due to be held between October and December this year, including in May 2017 when 250 Indigenous people called for a voice through the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/scott-morrison-rejects-illdefined-risky-voice-with-no-limits/news-story/4c1ac70057ea85a26572933c8a57280f

https://voice.gov.au/about-voice/history-constitutional-recognition-and-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-voice

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895004

File: 62c5935f484b5e7⋯.jpg (748.39 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Former_prime_minister_Scot….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18894995

Leeser pleads for Coaliton voters to vote for Voice as Morrison criticises ‘ill-defined’ body

James Massola - May 24, 2023

Liberal MP Julian Leeser has appealed to Australians to vote for the Voice to parliament, saying it will help transform remote Indigenous communities by tackling entrenched problems, as former prime minister Scott Morrison made a rare public intervention to urge a No vote.

In a heartfelt speech that addressed Coalition voters specifically, Leeser – the Liberal Party’s leading Voice advocate, who quit Peter Dutton’s frontbench so he could campaign for a Yes vote – said the body would eliminate the economic and social differences between Indigenous and other Australians, rather than creating two classes of Australian, as Dutton and other No advocates claim.

“The Voice will work on making our remote communities safer. It will work to rid communities of addictions from nicotine and alcohol to ice. It will work to get children in school and keep them there. It will work to address the terrible rates of infant mortality and renal failure in many Indigenous communities,” Leeser told parliament during the lengthy debate on legislation to enable the referendum.

“And it will work to create local jobs and industries so that we can break a culture of welfare dependency.

“Some say the Voice will give Indigenous Australians a place of privilege. Does anyone really believe that Indigenous Australians occupy a place of privilege?”

He said most referendum debates make the “if it aint broke don’t fix it” argument.

“Normally, that is a valid and compelling argument. But the system is broken,” he said.

Leeser mocked suggestions the proposed body would have a say on Australia’s future submarine fleet or purchases by the Department of Finance, pointing out it would not run programs or hand out grants.

“The parliament will still be supreme in matters of policy and law. The Voice will advise. Just like the security services, the chief medical officer, chief scientist, DFAT [Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade] and so many agencies advise,” he said.

But Morrison, making a rare intervention in public debate over the constitutional change, warned the Voice would permanently create “different rights for one group of Australians over others, based solely on race”.

Morrison, who until Wednesday had spoken just twice in parliament since losing the prime ministership a year ago, said the “ill-defined” constitutional change would have the opposite effect of previous initiatives, including the landmark 1967 referendum in which the Constitution was changed to give Indigenous Australians the same rights as all other Australians.

“This referendum is not a vote about whether Australians wish to support and do everything they can to recognise and improve the lives of Indigenous Australians. We all agree on this, and we can all say yes to this. But that is not the question the government is proposing for this referendum,” he said.

The well-known Cronulla Sharks fan also took a swipe at sporting codes, including the NRL, which have recently declared their support for the Voice proposal. But his tone was markedly different to Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s denunciation on Tuesday of the proposal as a regressive and a radical threat to Australian democracy.

“While keenly interested in the NRL’s opinion on hip-drop tackles and the six-again rule, I respectfully won’t be deferring to the NRL for constitutional advice to guide my decision,” Morrison said.

“Permanently changing the Constitution in the way the government proposes will sadly not change the desperate circumstances being experienced in so many Indigenous communities across Australia,” he said, adding that he remained committed to a legislated Voice to parliament.

“I remain committed to the constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians and all Australians being treated equally under our Constitution.”

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/voice-to-parliament-is-ill-defined-scott-morrison-says-20230524-p5daut.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895012

File: 6a7ef9841dcecba⋯.jpg (159.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Co_Chairs_of_the_First_Peo….jpg)

File: 032c3cbbfae2c12⋯.jpg (187.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

File: c30b25462a222a6⋯.jpg (106.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_and_Sussan_Le….jpg)

File: e946523c7a76042⋯.jpg (125.32 KB,768x1024,3:4,Marcus_Stewart.jpg)

>>18676743

A national Indigenous voice to parliament is the first step towards a better future as equals

MARCUS STEWART - MAY 24, 2023

As a proud Nira illim bulluk man of the Taungurung Nation, I want to see the Yes vote get up, and I will campaign my hardest to make sure it has the best possible chance at the ballot box.

I do this because I envision a future where First Nations people determine their own futures. We have the knowledge and experience to better our lives. Yet in 2023 we lack the tools to shape the policies that affect our communities, our culture and our lands.

For the past few years I have been a co-chairman of the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria, the democratically elected voice for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people on the journey to treaty. We’ve made great progress.

With our second election next month, our mob across the whole state will be invited to choose the people who will negotiate a statewide treaty with the Victorian government.

In Victoria, we are committed to actioning every element of the Uluru Statement from the Heart. We have a voice in the assembly. We’ve set up the Yoorrook Justice Commission, the first official truth-telling process in Australia, and soon we’ll have treaty.

These are things our people called for, and ones that are being called for right across the nation.

Voice, treaty and truth are all supported by the overwhelming majority of our people. One of the most consistent themes we’ve heard is the need for our people to be involved in the decisions that affect our lives.

For a long time, decisions about our people have been made without consultation from us.

Whereas everyone knows that programs for us work better when they are made with us. The strength of the assembly is drawn from our communities. When you look at our elected members it’s clear to everyone that Peter Dutton’s fearmongering about “elites” and “Canberra bubbles” is rubbish.

Our representatives are from all walks of life and from every corner of the state. The progress we’re making in Victoria will improve the lives our people. The organising principal of this success is creating a system that includes and incorporates our knowledge from the ground up – not from the top.

But these elements from the Uluru statement are not reflected on a national level. The voice is just the first step in a long journey. It will help us build a better future together as equals. The voice doesn’t come from the top, it’s not imposed on us. We’ve been asking for it; it comes from us, by us.

We hear a lot of chatter from politicians and the like about a supposed lack of detail. At face value, the voice to parliament is exactly what it says on the tin: a voice. But what that voice can offer for our people is nearly limitless. We know this is a marathon and not a sprint.

The bill hasn’t even passed yet and we are seeing the constant scare tactics and misinformation spread by the No campaign. Australians deserve better.

We have to approach this debate with integrity and legitimacy, while bringing as many people as possible along for the journey. To vote down the voice is to assume that the past and the present actions inflicted against Indigenous people have been effective, or that we are on the right trajectory. Famously, insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

A change in our lives requires a change in the existing systems that have continually failed us.

With a voice, it is not hard to imagine a world in which things such as health, housing and incarceration receive tangible, real and lasting action.

Naturally, there are still pockets of doubt within our own communities. We’ve heard a lot of promises in our time, most of which have turned out to be empty ones. But enshrining a voice in the Constitution guarantees we will always have a seat at the table.

With a voice we can progress the big-picture reforms such as treaty at a national level.

For those who want to see a fairer future, where our voices are valued and respected, I urge you to walk with us and vote Yes to the voice to parliament.

Marcus Stewart is a member of the Referendum Working Group and is co-chairman of the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/a-national-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-is-the-first-step-towards-a-better-future-as-equals/news-story/82f80deb813ec271abfb7254fa7bab95

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895018

File: ff73eb7a11d598c⋯.jpg (109.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_in_Se….jpg)

File: c65d726474365a5⋯.jpg (106.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,Assistant_Minister_for_Ind….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18708643

Lidia Thorpe in senate estimates row with Indigenous minister Malarndirri McCarthy: ‘You’re a disgrace to your people’

PAIGE TAYLOR - MAY 24, 2023

Indigenous Senator Lidia Thorpe has stormed out of senate estimates after a shouting match with Labor MP Malarndirri McCarthy, who told the Greens-turned-independent Senator: “You are a disgrace to your people”.

Senator Thorpe and Senator McCarthy were yelling over each other during an exchange about $14.2m for community safety initiatives in the Northern Territory. After Senator Thorpe had established the money went to police, she shouted at Ms McCarthy: “How dare you”.

Senator Thorpe began questioning a senior public servant from the National Indigenous Australians Agency about whether any of its budget was given to NT Police.

“Is black money being used for NT Police?” she asked.

The senior public servant replied that NIAA had given money for improvements in safety in communities in the NT.

Senator Thorpe said: “Community safety as in the community being safe from police? Or, which way?”.

The public servant replied: “This money is provided in two areas that have been identified as needing improvements in community safety”.

Senator Thorpe: “How much are you paying the Northern Territory police from black money?”

At this point, another public servant read from budget papers and said: “So Senator in the most recent announcements, $14.2m was provided for high visibility police and law enforcement operations. This includes targetting grog money, increasing the liquor licensing compliance and boosting security guards in public places. There was $10 million for justice reinvestment initiatives in Central Australia”

At his point, Senator Thorpe could be heard interjecting by saying: “Disgusting”

“I am so violated from that answer, I am so disgusted When the Northern Territory police get $14m when our youth services are struggling,” Senator Thorpe said.

She then turned to Senator McCarthy and said: “How can you let this happen Senator McCarthy?”

The assistant minister said the government had given $25m for youth services and, pointing at Senator Thorpe, she said: “How dare you when we have First Nations people working in the police force?”

Senator Thorpe: “Are you protecting the police?”

Senator McCarthy: “No I am telling you we have First Nations police who are doing their best to improve the situation”

Senator Thorpe: “Police are police. Doesn’t matter what colour they are”

The exchange occurred infront of Greens Senator Dorinda Cox, a Noongar woman and former police officer.

Senator McCarthy and Senator Thorpe then began talking over each other at high volume.

Senator McCarthy could be heard to say to Senator Thorpe: You are the disgrace. Rubbishing everyone for your agenda … You are a disgrace to your people.”

Senator McCarthy later withdrew her remarks and Senator Thorpe also withdrew the words “How dare you”.

Then Senator Thorpe left abruptly while talking in a sharp tone. She said in part, an apparent reference to Senator McCarthy: “been in power too long”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/lidia-thorpe-in-senate-estimates-row-with-indigenous-minister-malarndirri-mccarthy-youre-a-disgrace-to-your-people/news-story/e5e2a2ac6b77b13cc690e8bafa2c0d66

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895060

File: 6a18e0c0144fa9b⋯.jpg (118.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Detective_Superintendent_S….jpg)

File: 760eedff0c33d01⋯.jpg (63.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_denied_….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18885147

Brittany Higgins’ ‘drive to be in media’ made work difficult: top cop

KRISTIN SHORTEN and REMY VARGA - MAY 24, 2023

1/3

The senior police officer who oversaw the investigation into Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation says the complainant’s “drive to be in the media” made their work “difficult”, and that the case impacted their relationship with the Victims of Crime Commissioner.

Detective Superintendent Scott Moller is giving his third day of evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system, chaired by Walter Sofronoff KC.

During cross examination of Supt Moller, Heidi Yates’s lawyer asserted that the Victims of Crime Commissioner was “well within her rights” to become Ms Higgins’ support person and act as a conduit between the complainant and police who were investigating her rape claim against Bruce Lehrmann.

Peggy Dwyer said that under the Victims of Crime Commission Act the Ms Yates “is entitled to be present at the hearing of a proceeding” and act as a complainant’s support person if she chooses or is asked to do so.

Supt Moller admitted that the relationship between police and Ms Higgins, before Ms Yates was involved, was already “difficult”.

“You’ve pointed out it was frustrating for police, wasn’t it, trying to work with Ms Higgins to help develop the case?” she asked.

Supt Moller confirmed that Ms Higgins’ strategy in prioritising media engagement over the police investigation “made it difficult for investigators”.

“It was difficult because of the perceived interest that Ms Higgins had in the media, the drive that Ms Higgins showed to be in the media,” he said.

The inquiry heard that on April 8, 2021 Supt Moller received a briefing document from Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, authored by Detective Sergeant Garreth Saunders, saying that Ms Higgins had asked for the investigation into her rape allegation to be re-opened but that she had refused to provide a police statement at that time.

“Yes, she had had an engagement with the media at that time,” Supt Moller said.

“The significance for me at that time was that Ms Higgins had already done media interviews and it appeared to me, from what I was told, that Ms Higgins wanted the matter reported and wanted it to be a ‘live’ investigation, is the word she used.

“And my opinion was that she wanted it ‘live’ to give credibility to the story that was being aired between February and May.”

Supt Moller said investigators’ frustrations deepened when Ms Higgins would not produce her mobile phone for examination.

Supt Moller, who has been an investigator since 1994, said he had enjoyed a “productive and respectful” working relationship with Ms Yates prior to investigating the rape allegation against Mr Lehrmann.

Dr Dwyer told the inquiry that in early May 2021 Ms Higgins had called Ms Yates and said ‘can you help me?’

“And the commissioner had the right to appear as a support or to adopt her as a support,” she said.

“And (Ms Higgins) explained to her how she was struggling. I don’t want to go into those details. But she needed her. She needed help.”

Ms Yates then called Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman and informed him that Ms Higgins had asked for all communication to “come through her”.

“That was entirely within her rights and appropriate in the circumstances, wasn’t it?” Dr Dwyer asked.

Supt Moller agreed that it was “under the Act”.

On May 5, 2021 Ms Yates emailed Inspector Boorman.

“As discussed, I’m writing to confirm that Ms Brittany Higgins has requested that for the time being contact with police in relation to the investigation of her matter come by myself rather than via direct contact with her,” she wrote.

Soon after Inspector Boorman informed Ms Yates that police needed to conduct a second interview with Ms Higgins. “to clarify some of the issues” with her evidence.

Ms Yates facilitated the second police interview for May 26, 2021 and organised Ms Higgins flights and accommodation.

Dr Dwyer said Ms Yates asked police if it suitable for her to attend as Ms Higgins’ support person and no one from ACT Police indicated that she should not.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895065

File: c1ffca41aed5c1e⋯.jpg (73.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peggy_Dwyer_who_is_represe….jpg)

File: b6fb62d14bc848e⋯.jpg (82.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Liberal_Party_staff….jpg)

>>18895060

2/3

Police followed procedures for ‘greater good’

Supt Moller said he’s proud of police officers for pushing ahead and laying charges against the former ministerial staffer for the alleged rape of Ms Higgins despite their own beliefs there was insufficient evidence.

He said police laid charges even though the prospect made some officers “feel sick” because following procedure was for the “greater good”.

“They [investigators] had deeply seated views in relation to not having sufficient evidence and even though they had those views they pushed forward against their own beliefs,” he said.

“I don’t think they lost objectivity because when we decided to go through and charge that was our direction.

“Even though they had their views, and this ties back to what I said earlier about us being a semi-military organisation … we’ve seen evidence where members of the investigation felt sick when they found out we were going to move forward to charge, they still did it.

“They were committed to the process because that’s what we do as police … If you no for whatever reason there’s a motor vehicle accident and it’s dangerous, we still go there, we still do it.

“Our opinion in some respects is not as important as the greater good. Like I said, we followed the process, we took the director’s advice and we went through the prosecution.”

No ‘outdated views’ on credibility of complainants: Moller

Supt Moller denied holding “outdated views” towards the credibility of complainants in sexual assault cases as he defended his investigation into allegations of rape made by Ms Higgins.

He told the Sofronoff inquiry on Wednesday that he changed his opinion on whether there was sufficient evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann over allegations of rape after receiving advice from ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold Gold SC.

“I agree my opinion changed when I read the advice from the director [Mr Drumgold] who is far more experienced in matters of the court,” he said.

Supt Moller raised concerns over Ms Higgins’ credibility and the sufficiency of evidence in the case with AFP commander Michael Chew, who recommended he seek advice from Mr Drumgold over whether to lay charges against Mr Lehrmann.

When Mark Tedeschi KC, who is representing Mr Drumgold, asked Supt Moller whether he didn’t understand the level of evidence required to lay charges in sex assault cases, he replied: “I don’t agree.”

“I had a view and I had an opinion,” said Supt Moller.

“And I forwarded that view and opinion to my commander and based on the collective evidence then a decision was made to forward to the DPP advice for advice.

“That’s what good investigators having a thorough investigation do, that’s what happens in high profile cases.”

When Mr Tedeschi asked Supt Moller whether his view there was insufficient evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann was based on outdated views held about the credibility of complainants, he replied: “No.”

When Mr Tedeschi asked Supt Moller whether the perceived credibility issues were issues that should be decided by a jury, he responded: “I think they were legitimate issues to convey to my manager.”

“I think ultimately the jury decides, I’d agree with that, but it’s certainly not my role to filter that evidence or decide on whether that information or evidence goes to the jury,” he said.

“My role is to provide all of that information for the decision makers. I’m not that person.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895067

File: 5944a63fe5d2ba4⋯.jpg (125.4 KB,768x768,1:1,Superintendent_Moller_was_….jpg)

File: 0693924907df67c⋯.jpg (94.28 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_comment_Superintendent….jpg)

File: cc7733e106c75eb⋯.jpg (72.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mark_Tedeschi_KC_counsel_r….jpg)

File: 1bc60c61199a0c1⋯.jpg (87.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_DPP_Shane_Drumgold.jpg)

>>18895065

3/3

Top cop Moller under fire over LinkedIn ‘like’

Supt Moller came under fire for ‘liking’ a comment on LinkedIn that Mr Lehrmann was “innocent until proven otherwise” and should not be “negatively labelled for the rest of his life”.

The inquiry heard Supt Moller liked the comment posted to the professional networking website under a story in The Australian on a push for Mr Drumgold to resign over his handling of Ms Higgins’ case.

Under questioning from Mark Tedeschi KC, who is representing Mr Drumgold, Supt Moller accepted that he might have “liked” the comment when he should not have.

“You see there that the original post contains a photograph of Mr Lehrmann from an article in The Australian,” Mr Tedeschi said.

“And the heading underneath the photograph says ‘push for DPP to resign over Lehrmann trial’.

“And somebody has added this comment down the bottom of the page.

“And you’ve liked that comment in your capacity as a Detective superintendent of the unsolved homicide squad,” Mr Tedeschi said.

“What I want to suggest to you is that it was entirely inappropriate for you as a Detective superintendent of the unsolved homicide squad to like a message in relation to this matter.”

Mr Tedeschi suggested that liking the comment showed Supt Moller held “a bias by you in favour of Mr Lehrmann”.

“No, I don’t agree with that,” the veteran officer said. “What I agree, or what I believe it shows, is that I liked the comment or agreed with the comment.”

Mr Tedeschi insisted that Supt Moller’s liking of the comment was “inappropriate” given he was involved in the investigation of an allegation against Mr Lehrmann.

“To be publicly, in your capacity as a police officer, liking a comment of that nature. What do you say to that?” he asked.

Supt Moller replied: “In hindsight and on reflection, I shouldn’t have liked the comment.”

Supt Moller – who now works in unsolved homicide – agreed that the ACT Police’s social media policy restricted officers, in their official capacity, “from commenting publicly on matters of public controversy”.

“Yes, I’ve liked it as Scott Moller,” he said.

“I’m not very active on LinkedIn so I don’t recall it.

“I don’t remember doing it.”

Supt Moller conceded that liking the post was “contrary to police policy”.

“Look, I’ll accept that,” he said.

“I probably shouldn’t have liked the comment.”

Concern over pursuit of some sexual assault cases

Supt Moller said he was concerned sexual assault cases that don’t meet the required evidentiary threshold are being prosecuted after a review was instigated by ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold SC.

Supt Moller said prosecutors were now proceeding with sexual assault cases they previously wouldn’t have progressed after a steering committee was established to review cases.

“In my view it’s a change in the process and in my view I have been concerned a lot of matters we are looking to progress are not meeting the required thresholds.”

The inquiry heard Mr Drumgold approached the police commissioner and the ACT police minister about low charging rates in sex offence cases.

Supt Moller said the review committee had made investigators believe their recommendations were less important than before.

“I think what it’s done is added another layer to the decision making process that has affected the teams,” he said.

The inquiry will return on Thursday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/detective-superintendent-scott-moller-liked-linkedin-comment-about-bruce-lehrmann/news-story/ccbaf28baed5202371df37b076b60fa9

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/top-cop-in-bruce-lehrmann-trial-to-face-third-day-of-questioning/news-story/6c3e87b56d9bfe8f7cf54146f14fcb74

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895074

File: 7afe99ae0ea625f⋯.jpg (1.62 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Detective_Superintendent_S….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18885147

Police officer who led investigation into Brittany Higgins's rape allegation reveals he is sexual assault survivor

Patrick Bell - 24 May 2023

1/2

The head investigator into Brittany Higgins's allegation that she had been raped has revealed he is a survivor of sexual assault.

Detective Superintendent Scott Moller disclosed the information on his third day of giving evidence to an ACT board of inquiry, which is examining the conduct of criminal justice agencies in the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann.

Mr Lehrmann maintains his innocence, and there have been no findings against him after his trial was abandoned.

Throughout his testimony, Superintendent Moller was grilled about several investigators' reluctance to charge Mr Lehrmann, including a report in which he raised concerns with Ms Higgins's credibility and the strength of the prosecution case.

Wrapping up his time providing evidence, Superintendent Moller's lawyer, Matt Black, asked him what life experience he brought to his role with ACT police.

Superintendent Moller told the inquiry that 45 years ago he was sexually assaulted.

"I'm a survivor," he said.

"That has driven my desire to make sure [other victims are supported]."

Superintendent Moller also denied that police who believed the case should not progress had lost their objectivity about the case.

"They had deeply seeded views in relation to not having sufficient evidence [to charge Mr Lehrmann] and even though they had those views, they pushed forward against their own beliefs," he said.

"I think we've seen evidence where members of the investigation team felt sick when they found out we were going to move forward to charge.

"They still did it, and they were committed to the process because that's what we do as police."

Superintendent Moller said he ultimately took the advice of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Shane Drumgold, to charge Mr Lehrmann.

Denial of undercharging sexual assault cases

Superintendent Moller also denied that police were under-charging alleged sexual offenders at the time Ms Higgins made her complaint.

Today, Superintendent Moller was shown a report from the Sexual Assault Prevention and Review (SAPR) steering committee, which showed the proportion of alleged sexual offences proceeding to charge in the ACT was seven per cent in 2021, compared to 44 per cent in 2015.

The barrister for Mr Drumgold, Mark Tedeschi, argued that represented "a deterioration in the level of charging".

But Superintendent Moller said that was "absolutely not" his view.

"The team that work on sexual assault investigations are a dedicated, professional group of investigators," he said.

"From my perspective, the data is not accurate."

The inquiry heard that a number of sexual assault cases that did not initially proceed to charge had been referred to police for re-examination and some of those had since resulted in charges being laid.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895076

File: 4ab630db7261049⋯.jpg (1.33 MB,4240x2832,265:177,ACT_Victims_of_Crime_Commi….jpg)

>>18895074

2/2

Senior cop walks back claims Brittany Higgins's support person was 'inappropriate'

Earlier this morning, Superintendent Moller backed away from his criticism of ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner (VCC) Heidi Yates and her actions to support Ms Higgins.

Yesterday, Superintendent Moller was critical of the conduct of Ms Yates, who acted as an intermediary between police and Ms Higgins during the investigation.

Ms Yates also accompanied Ms Higgins to court during the trial and was present during multiple interactions between Ms Higgins and criminal justice agencies.

"The involvement of the VCC in the investigation was, in my view, inappropriate," Superintendent Moller had said in a statement to the inquiry.

"I could not understand why the head of an organisation was providing the role of 'support person' to an alleged victim of sexual assault."

But today, under questioning from Ms Yates's lawyer, Dr Peggy Dwyer, Superintendent Moller conceded he has since changed his view.

"I have now looked at the [legislation] and I can absolutely see that it's within the role for Ms Yates to be involved in matters like this as a support person if she chooses to," he said.

Superintendent Moller had also raised concerns that Ms Yates was "attempting to place a barrier" between investigators and Ms Higgins.

But Dr Dwyer today pointed to Ms Yates's role in facilitating a second police interview with Ms Higgins, and Superintendent Moller agreed she had "made it easier."

Superintendent Moller liked social media post critical of DPP

Superintendent Moller was also asked about a comment he liked on the social network LinkedIn, which Mr Tedeschi argued showed his bias in favour of Mr Lehrmann.

The comment was on a post that referred to calls for Mr Drumgold to resign as the DPP.

"I was shocked by some of the prosecutor's reported words," the comment read.

"[Mr Lehrmann] should not be negatively labelled for the rest of his life."

Superintendent Moller said in hindsight he "probably shouldn't have liked the comment" from his professional LinkedIn account, but did not agree that it represented bias.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-24/senior-police-officer-scott-moller-sexual-assault-victim/102386648

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895087

File: c5702e9a942402b⋯.jpg (96.39 KB,893x593,893:593,Uyghur_detainees_listen_to….jpg)

File: 9b0268d4c8c4fb8⋯.jpg (377.76 KB,1600x1217,1600:1217,Satellite_imagery_shows_su….jpg)

File: 55ca3fb5ad3fdc9⋯.jpg (1.17 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Grace_Forrest_says_the_ene….jpg)

>>18860738

Forrest group Walk Free warns of slavery threat in Australia's solar panel supply chains

Daniel Mercer and Nick Dole - 24 May 2023

1/2

A human rights group funded by mining magnate Andrew Forrest has warned of the rapidly rising risks of modern slavery and forced labour in the world's renewable energy supply chains.

Walk Free, an arm of Mr Forrest's Minderoo Foundation, will today release a report outlining how Australia imports $US17.4 billion [$26 billion] of products that may have used coerced labour.

And it is warning that renewable energy products led by solar are increasingly susceptible to the risks, particularly those made in China.

The finding comes after concerns were raised in Federal Parliament about Australia's heavy reliance on imported Chinese solar panels allegedly made using forced labour from ethnic minorities.

Xinjiang, a province in China's north-west, is home to ethnic groups including the Uyghurs, who have reportedly been subject to persecution by authorities from Beijing.

There have also been reports, including from Sheffield Hallam University last year, suggesting the widespread use of coerced Uyghur labour in camps to produce polysilicon — the key ingredient for solar panels.

Modern slavery in broad daylight

In its latest Global Slavery Index, released today, Walk Free found solar panels were becoming enmeshed with "at-risk" supply chains that may use forced labour.

The foundation found that solar panels were one of the most valuable products to fall into the category, with imports deemed risky worth $22 billion a year since 2018.

Of those, Australia's imports were worth $2 billion a year.

Grace Forrest, the founding director of Walk Free, said the problem of modern slavery, an umbrella term that included forced labour, forced marriage, human trafficking and debt bondage, was getting worse.

Ms Forrest said about 50 million people around the world were living in modern slavery, including as many as 40,000 in Australia, where she said they worked in industries such as agriculture and the care economy.

She said Australia was also a major importer of products that may have used modern slavery.

While electronics and garments were prone to the greatest levels of risk, Ms Forrest said solar panels were a growing area of concern.

"The risk with solar panels, as with many parts of the green economy, is the fact that they are transnational supply chains lacking severely in transparency and accountability," Ms Forrest said in London, where she was launching the report.

"The fact is that by default right now a green economy will be built on modern slavery.

"And we have an opportunity, and we argue, a very strong responsibility to step up and say you cannot harm people in the name of saving the planet."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895088

File: 83dff6560e91895⋯.jpg (394.47 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Workers_walk_by_the_perime….jpg)

File: f094afbf0da3157⋯.jpg (189.91 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Chinese_authorities_have_c….jpg)

>>18895087

2/2

Climate risks 'humanitarian too'

According to Walk Free, solar panels were among the five riskiest products for a swag of the world's biggest economies, including Australia, France, Germany, Japan and South Korea.

Almost 90 per cent of the global supply for polysilicon comes from China, with Walk Free noting that about half of that came from Xinjiang.

It also noted the United Nations had issued a "Just Transition" declaration in 2021 in a bid to better protect workers in the renewable energy industry around the world.

Despite this, Walk Free said "fewer than half the members" of the world's 20 biggest economies had so far signed up to the pledge.

Ms Forrest said the onus was on governments including Australia's, which introduced the Modern Slavery Act in 2018, to drive change.

But she said consumers also had a responsibility.

"We don't want to dampen people's enthusiasm for a green future," she said.

"We know that the climate crisis is a real risk to Australians and people living throughout the world.

"All we're asking people to understand is that the climate crisis is also a humanitarian one and as we rapidly procure these products, we need governments to ensure there is genuine safety and protection so people at the front of supply chains."

In Senate budget estimates this week, officials from the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water acknowledged concerns about the use of forced labour in Australia's solar supply chains.

Concerns raised in Parliament

Under questioning from Liberal Senator Hollie Hughes, the department suggested the risks bolstered the case for "having more diversity" in solar suppliers.

To illustrate the point, deputy secretary Simon Duggan cited the announcement at the weekend in which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Joe Biden vowed to "broaden supply chains, including clean energy technologies".

"At the moment, this department is not monitoring or tracking the proportion of solar panels that are coming from different overseas markets," Mr Duggan said.

"But it's an area of broad interest … [with] very good economic reasons for having more diversity and supply of solar panels."

The Clean Energy Council, a lobby group representing renewable power developers, has backed calls for Australia to diversify its supply, including by bringing some manufacturing onshore.

Nick Aberle from the council said while human rights abuses were not "peculiar to solar", they were untenable and consumers, businesses and governments had a moral obligation to act.

"There are two key approaches to this," Dr Aberle said.

"One is around the visibility into the supply chains.

"So, if 50 per cent of the world's polysilicon is linked to modern slavery that means there's 50 per cent that isn't.

He said consumers who ensured the products they were buying weren't linked to modern slavery could help drive shifts within the industry.

"The other key part of this is also looking at how we can shift supply chains to other parts of the world, whether that's into Australia or whether that's into other countries where we can have greater visibility and transparency into that supply chain," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-24/forrest-group-walk-free-warns-slavery-threat-solar-panels/102383470

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895116

File: b8707e18fca13e8⋯.jpg (76.34 KB,753x755,753:755,ASIO_Director_General_Mike….jpg)

File: 840e2a25cd5efab⋯.jpg (2.25 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_Victorian_government_s….jpg)

>>18840513

>>18890139

ASIO warns neo-nazi groups are seeking to recruit more members

Tom Lowrey and Nabil Al Nashar - 24 May 2023

Right-wing terror threats make up roughly 30 per cent of ASIO's current counter-terror caseload, as the head of the agency warns they are growing in prominence to try and recruit more members.

ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess was questioned during a Senate Estimates hearing whether recent public demonstrations signalled a growing threat from Neo-Nazi groups.

Mr Burgess suggested while the demonstrations are becoming more brazen, they are primarily aimed at driving recruitment, and do not necessarily indicate a growing terror threat from Neo-Nazi groups.

He argued the greatest threat of a terror attack comes from an individual acting alone, likely with little or no warning, and possibly frustrated with a lack of action from any group they may be a part of.

"In the case of the Neo-Nazi groups, what we worry about the most is people who join a group, or get drawn into that ideology, and are not satisfied there is no action and go off and do it themselves," he said.

Neo-Nazis have publicly gathered on a number of occasions in recent months, including a violent demonstration involving about 20 people in Melbourne earlier this month.

In March, Neo-Nazis gathered to support a prominent anti-transgender activist at a Melbourne rally, performing Nazi salutes.

How right-wing groups are avoiding being listed by ASIO

Mr Burgess was questioned on whether the public demonstrations indicated a greater threat.

"It's a sign that those groups are more emboldened to come out publicly, to push what they believe in and recruit to their cause," he said.

"Does that mean there's been an increase in the numbers of them? I don't see that correlation, I think they're just more emboldened.

"We have seen a rise in people drawn to this ideology, for reasons we don't fully understand."

Mr Burgess said it could be that the recent Neo-Nazi activity has been aimed at building influence, and trying to legitimately influence politics and public discourse.

He was asked if there was any evidence Neo-Nazis had sought to infiltrate political parties.

"I would not talk about specific things we're looking at directly, I can assure you if we saw that it would an interesting thing we would have to consider investigating," he said.

"Threats to security are well-defined, it's not unlawful for people to have a Neo-Nazi ideology in this country."

In evidence given to the estimates hearing, Mr Burgess said while ideologically-motivated extremism (mostly far-right groups) make up roughly 30 per cent ASIO's current caseload, religiously-motivated extremism takes up the other 70 per cent.

Greens Senator David Shoebridge questioned the ASIO director on why only three of the 29 'listed' terror organisations are right-wing groups, given the 70-30 split.

When a terror organisation becomes 'listed', it becomes illegal to be a member of such a group, or provide funding or resources to it.

The first right-wing group to be listed was the 'Sonnenkrieg Division', a UK-based group, which was listed in 2019.

Mr Burgess said the right-wing groups are often "smarter" and avoid publicly advocating terrorism, which would see them listed.

"To be listed, that group has to actually promote and advocate acts of terrorism. So it's a high penalty with a high threshold, if you don't cross that threshold you don't get penalised and listed," he said.

"And the reason we are where we are is those (listed) groups have actually pushed and advocated for acts of terrorism, where other groups are sadly smarter and don't do that publicly.

"Because that's what the law, as it currently stands, requires them to do."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-23/asio-boss-warns-neo-nazi-groups-becoming-more-emboldened/102383558

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895125

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18676841

US Marines join Aussie and Indonesian troops for training in the Northern Territory

ABC News (Australia)

May 24, 2023

The Marine Rotational Force in Darwin has begun its first training for the year - Exercise Crocodile Response.

Partnering with the ADF and the Indonesian National Military, the trilateral operation sharpens the groups' skills in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrSndiIucrs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18895147

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18860803

Donald Trump Jr says it is important to fight for freedoms as he calls out radical left ahead of his Australian speaking tour

The eldest son of former United States president Donald Trump has told Sky News Australia people have to start standing up for their freedoms and democracy, which he believes are being compromised.

David Wu - May 24, 2023

Donald Trump Jr has urged Australians to fight back against the rise of the radical left, as other nations are "laughing" at the West over its "stupidity".

The eldest son of former United States president Donald Trump told Sky News Australia it was important to fight for freedoms and democracy to preserve traditional values of society, which he claimed had been lost in recent years.

"I look at Australia as a pretty rugged country that believed in freedom and all the values we did here in the United States," he told Paul Murray Live in an interview which will air on Wednesday at 9pm, ahead of his speaking tour Down Under in June.

"All of the bastions of freedom and democracy that I thought really existed, the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, these were the leading places to support that freedom, but you saw just how fragile that was.

"I think it’s important we make sure we’re fighting for that freedom."

Sky News Australia host Paul Murray questioned whether the battle had already been lost "if you sit back and think the system will correct itself".

Trump Jr agreed with the sentiment and used the United States as a talking point, referencing the COVID-19 pandemic which shut the world down for two years.

"We saw that with COVID, if you were a doctor and you said, 'of course it came from the Wuhan lab that studies the virus in question in the town where it originated, you were thrown out of medicine'," the 45-year-old said.

He argued the lab leak theory "was the most plausible answer".

"But if you were a doctor and you even suggested it, you would be thrown out of the profession in the name of preserving the woke radical ideology of the totalitarian left," Trump Jr said.

His father, who was president at the time, claimed the fatal virus had leaked out of a laboratory in the Chinese city of Wuhan in the Hubei province.

The theory was initially shut down by leading experts and doctors in the field of disease, before it began to gain traction over time.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Christopher Wray said in February this year a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology had likely led to the spread of the virus.

But Mr Wray was not able to share any further details on the department's assessment as it was classified.

The White House has remained neutral on the topic so far and have not reached a definitive conclusion, noting the differing views among the intelligence community.

Beijing responded to the claim and said Washington was "rehashing the lab-leak theory" and attempting to discredit China.

"We urge the US to respect science and facts… stop turning origin tracing into something about politics and intelligence, and stop disrupting social solidarity and origins cooperation,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said in March.

Trump Jr said enemies and the "totalitarian left" were "sitting back and laughing at the incompetence and stupidity" of the West.

"Whether it’s gender ideology, COVID response, logic, everything is either climate change or racism, even if it doesn’t have to do with climate change or racism, it just doesn’t work," the political activist and businessman said.

"Our enemies are laughing and our allies are scared because they’re watching the demise of the once leader of the free world."

Trump Jr said he was looking forward to travelling to Australia for his speaking tour in June.

He had previously spent more than one month backpacking across the east coast while he was between his junior and senior years in college.

"No, there were no snowflakes then," he joked.

He will begin the Australian tour in Sydney on June 9 before heading to Brisbane on June 10 and then Melbourne on June 11.

Tickets can be purchased on trumplive.com.au

https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/united-states/donald-trump-jr-says-it-is-important-to-fight-for-freedoms-as-he-calls-out-radical-left-ahead-of-his-australian-speaking-tour/news-story/86bb15333196db902a8e038a9fdd97ba

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-Nk5P6UNAI

https://www.trumplive.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8b12dc No.18897340

File: 849232ef935ca7c⋯.jpeg (59.38 KB,836x960,209:240,6CC8C054_3FA3_4F02_A9FE_C….jpeg)

Thanks for sending Rolf over to Britain, Aussies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a3264e No.18900235

wеак

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900626

File: 49f845407b79c9f⋯.mp4 (15.84 MB,640x360,16:9,The_Voice_The_PM_s_plea.mp4)

>>18676743

Be on ‘right side of history’ on Voice, PM urges Australians

Lisa Visentin - May 25, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has appealed to Australians to walk in the shoes of their Indigenous brothers and sisters as they weigh up how to vote in the Voice referendum as he accused Opposition Leader Peter Dutton of amplifying misinformation in his bid to sink the proposal.

Speaking on the referendum bill in the House of Representatives, Albanese sought to dismantle the arguments of the Coalition and the No campaign while aiming to deliver a high-level pitch to Australians to be on the “right side of history”.

He denounced Dutton’s efforts to frame the Voice debate through the prism of racial division as “unworthy of the alternative prime minister of this nation” and called instead for non-Indigenous Australians to imagine they were on the other side of the gap that successive governments had failed to close.

“Imagine your brothers and sisters are likely to die a decade younger than the general population. Imagine your daughter is more at risk during childbirth, and your grandchild more at risk of infant mortality. Imagine your son’s statistically more likely to go to jail than to go to university,” Albanese said.

“In 2023, imagine that people in your community are twice as likely to commit suicide as anywhere else. Imagine the rate of disease and disadvantage among your friends and neighbours is far higher than elsewhere.”

He used his speech to counter the Liberal leader’s remarks earlier in the week that the Voice would “re-racialise” Australia, divide the country “in spirit and in law” and, invoking George Orwell, would make Indigenous Australians more equal than non-Indigenous Australians.

“It is disappointing but not surprising that the loudest campaigners for the No vote have already been reduced to relying upon things that are plainly untrue,” Albanese said.

“It’s also very telling, that in his desperation, the leader of the opposition is now seeking to amplify this misinformation and all of its catastrophising and contradictions. Those exhausted cliches of Orwell and identity politics, the ongoing conceit that there is apparently no inequality in Australia now.”

Debate on the bill will continue in the lower house next week, with more than 100 MPs from across the parliament expected to lay out their reasons for supporting or opposing the referendum, before it proceeds to the Senate in June. It will pass with cross-party support after the Coalition confirmed it would not stand in the way of Australians having their say at a referendum.

The bill’s passage will clear the way for the national vote to be held between October and December.

During his speech, Albanese referenced Dutton’s decision in 2008 to boycott the apology to the stolen generations delivered by then-prime minister Kevin Rudd to argue there was hypocrisy in his current opposition to the Voice.

“This is the same leader of the opposition who says that he boycotted the national apology because he thought it was just symbolism and wouldn’t make a practical difference,” Albanese said.

“Now he’s leading a campaign against constitutional recognition through a Voice, saying that he only wants symbolism, not something that will make a practical difference.”

He placed the Voice referendum on a continuum of the Aboriginal rights struggle, noting Australians would cast their vote in the coming months 60 years after the Yirrkala bark petition, 56 years after the 1967 referendum, 48 years after Gough Whitlam poured red soil into Vincent Lingiari’s hands to symbolise the handing back of land, 32 years after the Barunga statement calling for a treaty was hung in Parliament House, 31 years after the High Court delivered the historic Mabo decision, and 15 years since the apology to the stolen generations.

“All of those were opposed at the time. All of those we were told would lead to bad outcomes. All of those are celebrated now. We hold them up as milestones of national progress,” Albanese said.

After a week of emotionally-charged debate in the parliament, and concerns within the Yes camp about polling showing a downward trend in support for a Yes vote, Indigenous leaders will gather at Uluru on Friday to renew their call for Australians to join them in supporting the Voice.

Friday marks the sixth anniversary of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which was signed by more than 250 Indigenous delegates and called for a First Nations Voice in the Constitution.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/dutton-seeking-to-amplify-misinformation-on-voice-pm-20230525-p5db7k.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900636

File: b5e0d49edf67a96⋯.jpg (124.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,During_debate_on_the_Voice….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18900626

Voice wording won’t change - Albanese

Callan Morse - May 25, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed the current wording of the constitutional amendment to enshrine an Indigenous Voice to Parliament will not change.

It comes as debate on the constitutional alteration bill continued in the nation's capital, with Mr Albanese imploring MPs to support the Indigenous Voice, suggesting it was a simple proposal that would provide meaningful action.

"A Yes vote in this referendum is a chance for all of us to take the next step on the journey of reconciliation, to be counted and to be heard on the right side of history," Mr Albanese told parliament on Thursday.

"For most non-Indigenous Australians, this will make no difference to their lives. But it is an opportunity to make a difference for Indigenous Australians."

In confirming the government would act according to recommendations made by the joint select committee, Mr Albanese said the proposal was backed by years of consultation and was the best possible Voice proposal.

"These design principles are the product of years of hard work, including by members of the referendum working group," he said.

"They also represent years of consultation and dialogue among communities, the more than 1000 meetings that took place in the lead up to the First Nations constitutional convention that was held at Uluru."

"The changes that were made to the Garma draft and agreed to by the referendum working group, were aimed precisely at reinforcing the primacy of this parliament."

Mr Albanese suggested the Liberal Party had "locked themselves into saying no", criticising opposition leader Peter Dutton's second reading speech on the constitutional alteration bill he made earlier in the week.

"In spite of that, the Liberal Party frontbench already locked themselves into saying no, before the committee process that they called for and they said was important, had even commenced its work," Mr Albanese said.

"The leader of the opposition gave a speech in this chamber that is simply unworthy of the alternative prime minister of this nation. Instead of taking the chance to unify there are some that have sought only to divide. Now, clearly, there is no form of words that will satisfy some of the leaders of the 'no' campaign."

He also dismissed the Nationals' long-held position on an enshrined Indigenous Voice.

"The National Party decided say no before the draft questions had even been finalised," the Prime Minister noted.

Defending the current wording, Mr Albanese shot down calls to remove reference to executive government in the proposed amendment.

"Some have suggested that we alter or remove the second clause, specifically the reference to executive government… but the argument put forward is not a legal or a constitutional one," Mr Albanese told the House.

"They are not saying that the Voice should not talk to the executive government, they are just saying that it should not be included in that part in the constitution."

Lower house MPs will continue debating the final form of the bill today, with a vote expected sometime next week before the debate shifts to the senate.

The Indigenous Voice to Parliament bill is set to be finalised next month, ahead of the referendum which will be held sometime between October and December.

https://nit.com.au/25-05-2023/6106/voice-wording-wont-change-albanese

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900647

File: 039bc585a4df024⋯.jpg (112.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18900626

Anthony Albanese’s powerful speech doesn’t change the facts on the Indigenous voice to parliament

DENNIS SHANAHAN - MAY 25, 2023

Anthony Albanese has formalised Labor’s position of not changing the wording of the referendum on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government and rejecting any suggested compromise from supporters of the Voice aimed at ensuring its success.

The Prime Minister’s parliamentary speech on the referendum bill was explicit – there would be no change to the proposed wording and he sought to blame Peter Dutton and the Coalition for the intransigence.

While playing up minute differences of wording from the original Garma recommendation to suggest there had been big changes, Albanese absolutely rejected the argument and proposals for change from Yes supporters who feared inclusion of a wide-ranging voice impact on day-to-day government would lessen its chance of success.

Albanese also personally attacked the Opposition Leader as being “unworthy” in his opposition to the Voice and inferred there would have been changes if the Nationals and Liberals had not adopted positions against the referendum before the Parliamentary committee had finished its six-week hearings.

Singling out former Coalition Aboriginal Affairs spokesman, Julian Leeser, who resigned from the frontbench because he supported the Voice but wanted reference to executive government removed, Albanese said he respected his sincerity.

But, Albanese also rejected Lesser’s argument - and that of other Voice supporters - that simplifying the referendum and restricting the right to advice to just Parliament or the Ministry would make it more likely to succeed.

Public polls have shown a small but steady decline in support for the Voice referendum and a growth in opposition as the No campaign has argued for more details on how the Voice would work.

Noel Pearson has described some of this view as “bedwetters”.

Albanese simply said he did not accept the argument that the wording or impact of the Voice referendum should be changed just to increase the chance of success.

Albanese doesn’t accept the characterisation of his position as not offering change or setting up entrenched lines of argument, but the powerful parliamentary presentation from the Prime Minister on Thursday morning, with all its evident sincerity and emotion, does not change the fact there been no real change, no compromise and the debate is now on prescribed guidelines for the next six months.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albaneses-powerful-speech-doesnt-change-the-facts-on-the-voice/news-story/6d134fdd43e7891294416bea25e71881

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900665

File: 334cfb937e448f4⋯.mp4 (15.97 MB,640x360,16:9,Peter_Dutton_The_Voice_wil….mp4)

>>18676743

>>18900626

Peter Dutton: The Voice will 're-racialise our nation'.

David Speers - 25 May 2023

1/2

A gathering of Liberal Party branch members was due to be held in Sydney last night to discuss the case in favour of the Indigenous Voice.

The meeting was arranged to allow members to put their questions to Tony Nutt and Rachel Perkins. Nutt is a former federal director of the Liberal Party and chief of staff to John Howard, who now sits on the board of the Yes campaign body, Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition. Perkins, the renowned filmmaker and daughter of Charles Perkins, co-chairs the board.

Around 80 rank and file members were expected to turn up, but one organiser cautioned this didn't mean they were all supporters of the Voice. At best, they were open to hearing the Yes case.

Indeed, the number of Liberals now supporting the Voice is difficult to discern.

The mood amongst those few who are still publicly on board turned to dismay this week. Hopes have fizzled of building and launching a strong "Liberals for Yes" campaign, along the lines of a similar group that swung behind the case for same sex marriage.

Two body blows

Liberals for Yes have suffered two body blows.

The first was the realisation the Prime Minister won't be giving any further ground on the wording of the proposed constitutional change.

This was obvious two months ago, when an emotional Anthony Albanese stood alongside members of his Indigenous working group to announce the final wording he would put to parliament.

From this point on, Albanese was never going to break with these "giants of Australia", as he called them, regardless of the parliamentary committee process that followed.

In his judgement, there was no point giving ground to conservatives, because there was no form of words that would ever satisfy Peter Dutton. The Opposition Leader, in Albanese's view, was always destined to oppose a constitutionally enshrined Voice.

The second body blow for Liberal supporters of the Voice came on Monday, when Dutton delivered a full-scale denunciation of the Voice proposal in parliament. His speech on the legislation to enable the Voice referendum went much further than many were expecting.

Dutton repeated his well-worn critique about the Voice gumming up the courts and the workings of government. It then veered into more alarming territory.

The Liberal leader warned the "referendum on the Voice will undermine our equality of citizenship". He said it will "have an Orwellian effect where all Australians are equal, but some Australians are more equal than others."

Dutton even suggested "the Voice will re-racialise our nation".

This is the sort of language the Nationals have been using for months. And it follows the change from Liberal MP Julian Leeser to Country Liberal Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price (who sits with the National Party) as Shadow Minister for Indigenous Australians.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900671

File: d63e62b98499bc8⋯.jpg (1.43 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: 78e1a3df6e62748⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,It_was_obvious_two_months_….jpg)

File: d061a8de0b21426⋯.jpg (1.5 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Bridget_Archer_is_one_of_f….jpg)

>>18900665

2/2

Labor's suspicions confirmed

Labor saw the speech as confirmation their suspicions were right all along: the Opposition Leader was never genuinely open to the idea at all. If he fundamentally believes a constitutionally enshrined Voice is so dangerously divisive and would undermine equality, why was he weighing his position for so long?

Dutton is now throwing everything into the No campaign as if his leadership depends on it. Which perhaps it does.

He believes the referendum is on track to fail, and senses the mood of his Liberal colleagues and the party membership. For the most part, those members want to ensure it does.

Dutton is now engaged in a boots-and-all take-down of the Voice. His speech has given the green light for other Liberals to echo the lines about racial division.

Former prime minister Scott Morrison told parliament yesterday the Voice would create "different rights for one group of Australians over others, based solely on race."

But not all Liberals are comfortable going down this path.

Some Liberals disagree with Dutton

Liberal Senate leader Simon Birmingham somewhat awkwardly refused to defend Dutton's language when pressed yesterday on Radio National.

Birmingham will stick to the agreed party position but doesn't want to become an active No campaigner. Nor does deputy leader Sussan Ley, who doesn't intend to speak on the bill in parliament at all.

Incidentally, when it comes to a vote in the House next week, Dutton will still vote for the referendum to proceed, despite his opposition to the Voice. This is consistent with then prime minister John Howard voting for the Republican referendum to proceed, despite his well-known position.

The Nationals, by contrast, have decided to vote against allowing Australians to have their say. Leader David Littleproud says this is the "wrong proposition and question" and therefore the Nationals will oppose the referendum legislation altogether.

This means Liberals and Nationals will split on the legislation to hold the referendum, despite being united in opposing the proposal itself. The move will allow Senator Price to become one of the "authorised dissenters" who can then write the No campaign essay for the official pamphlet to be sent to all households.

Very few Liberal MPs will now publicly support the Voice. One of them is Tasmanian MP Bridget Archer, who spoke on the legislation just hours after Dutton.

While not mentioning her leader by name, Archer took apart his arguments one by one. "The Voice will not have veto power or act as a third chamber", she argued, expressing her disappointment at the claims being "wilfully perpetuated by some".

"Nor does the argument that this referendum is dividing the country by race make sense", Archer said, pointing out the Constitution still contains a race power, which has only ever been used to make laws about First Nations people. "So, if these laws exist, it's reasonable in my mind that Indigenous people have their voices heard over those laws."

Bridget Archer, however, is in the minority within her party.

The same-sex marriage "Liberals for Yes" movement at least had a leader (Malcolm Turnbull) who was on board. This time it's the complete opposite.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-25/liberals-for-yes-the-voice-dutton-body-blow/102387704

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900677

File: 9e43eb6e4dd2c59⋯.jpg (102.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_during_Questi….jpg)

File: cfa909103448747⋯.jpg (208.74 KB,768x1024,3:4,Peter_Dutton.jpg)

>>18676743

>>18900626

>>18900665

Opposition leader Peter Dutton is right to defend our history during the Indigenous voice to parliament debate

PETA CREDLIN - MAY 25, 2023

Earlier this week Peter Dutton made his best speech so far as Opposition Leader. But it hardly received any attention.

First, because it was in the parliament, and there’s a general assumption that parliamentary speeches are just mindless political point-scoring. And, second, because it was about the Indigenous voice to parliament, and there’s a tacit consensus among most media (other than The Australian) that any opposition to the voice is a breach of good manners.

Dutton took one or two jabs at the government, but this was a speech on the issue, not on the politics of the day, and it should be noticed by everyone who appreciates the portent in changing our Constitution, if only because it’s the clearest statement yet by a national leader of just what the voice might mean.

At the heart of Dutton’s speech was a plea to recognise that Australia was a historical success, made possible, at least in part, by a Constitution that should not lightly be changed.

In his words, “nowhere else in the world is there a success story like ours, one of Indigenous heritage, of British inheritance and of migration and multicultural success – three threads woven together brilliantly and harmoniously”.

Such success was “not something to be toyed with lightly”, he said, yet now we were being urged to change the nation’s rule book without a constitutional convention, with just a “4½-day committee, a kangaroo court” manipulated by a government that was always trying to steamroll the process because, as Dutton said, it “wants you to vote for the voice on a vibe”.

This is the key issue: the government insists we vote only on the principle of recognition – by way of a voice – and that we sign a blank cheque for this change. To deny Indigenous Australians the voice, according to the government, is disrespectful, even racist.

“If a voice is embedded in the Constitution,” said Dutton, “the parliament can’t change (it) … or pass laws to override it” because “the parliament cannot out-legislate the Constitution”. It was “here to stay”, he added, even though it “hasn’t even been road-tested” because “if Australians have buyers’ remorse the voice comes with a no-returns policy”.

Who could disagree with this? “As all Australians instinctively know,” said Dutton, “you wouldn’t buy a house without inspecting it and you wouldn’t purchase a car without test-driving it, yet the government wants you to vote on a voice not knowing what it is or what it can do.” That was why he called it “a reckless roll of the dice” to achieve a “moment in history” for the Prime Minister. But that “shouldn’t be at the expense of our country’s future or our democracy”.

As if to reinforce Dutton’s point, the government’s $10m so-called information campaign website (you can see it at voice.gov.au), launched last weekend, is one of the all-time great snow jobs. It’s propaganda masquerading as civics education because none of the information provided rises above the level of feel-good platitudes.

It states “the voice will give independent advice to the parliament and the government” but doesn’t specify how that advice might be arrived at, to whom it would be directed and what its effect might be.

It does, however, repeatedly insist “the voice will not have a veto power” even though the Prime Minister himself has said it would take “a brave government” to ignore its representations, while senior lawyers have said the process of making representations and considering them properly could seriously impede the government’s ability to get things done.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900683

File: 1c9ccbad2d8dada⋯.jpg (81.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_voice_referendum_Yes_c….jpg)

File: 21971c9d29e2f27⋯.jpg (147.51 KB,1280x720,16:9,Federal_Minister_for_Indig….jpg)

>>18900677

2/2

The website says “members of the voice would be selected by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, not appointed by the executive government” and “to ensure cultural legitimacy, the way that members of the voice are chosen would suit the wishes of local communities and would be determined through the post-referendum process”.

There is no clue who these people might be who will represent just 4 per cent of us but with a say that impacts all of us. What they won’t be is “responsible”, and that’s a critical point missing in this debate.

Unlike the politicians we hire and fire at every election, those appointed to the voice will be responsible for nothing and to no-one. It’s a body that’s all care and no responsibility, even though the lack of clear lines of accountability for the $30bn or so spent on the 800,000 or so of us who identify as Indigenous is a big part of the disadvantage and dysfunction that afflicts remote Australia.

The website goes on to say “the voice will be empowering, community-led, inclusive, respectful and culturally informed”. Yet this is the same voice whose most prominent champion, Noel Pearson, has just attacked Mick Gooda as a “bedwetter” for publicly canvassing changes to the voice; and who earlier attacked senator Jacinta Price as “punching down on blackfellas” and being “trapped in a redneck celebrity vortex” for opposing the voice.

Part II, section 11(4), of the Referendum Act states “the commonwealth shall not expend money in respect of the presentation of the argument in favour of, or the argument against, a proposed (constitutional change) except in relation to the preparation of the pamphlets” setting out both the Yes and the No case.

I’d be amazed if the government’s current misinformation campaign, which includes high-rotation soft-sell ads on radio and television, is not challenged in the courts and found to be illegal.

Despite the usual suspects from big business and the increasingly woke sporting world jumping on the voice bandwagon, its collapsing polls suggest traditional Australian scepticism towards government is starting to assert itself, particularly when the Prime Minister’s obsession with the voice is seen by voters to be at the expense of dealing with their cost-of-living pain.

As voters increasingly sense Labor is trying to rig the referendum and support will continue to slide because an activist government is one thing, but a tricky one is something they won’t abide.

Right now, there’s plenty of goodwill for Aboriginal people, but that doesn’t extend to the activists who are always peddling grievance and demanding separatism.

And as for the financial racket that is being welcomed to our own country (as if it belongs to some of us and not to all) and the Aboriginal flag flown coequally with the national flag, my sense is Australians are now well and truly over it.

Why should we have to apologise forever for the British settlement of this country two centuries ago, especially when so many of us are unconnected to the British legacy as migrants of other lands? How is the Greek or Somali migrant of recent years responsible for any colonial “shame”?

It was always a big mistake for Labor strategists to conclude that voter support for same-sex marriage a few years back meant that the electorate had moved to the left and therefore was just waiting to embrace other “progressive” causes.

For one thing, same-sex marriage was about treating people equally, regardless of their sexuality, while this is about treating people differently based on their race.

My instinct is that more and more of the quiet Australians could be getting ready to vote No because they’re sick of being patronised. And it won’t just be the voice that’s top of mind when they do: the whole hard-left push on everything from pronouns to big government will be included, too.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/dutton-is-right-to-defend-our-history-during-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-debate/news-story/0d2658eae3225ee723d0fffe10ce2660

https://voice.gov.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900698

File: 31f44eb9a83540b⋯.jpg (77.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Nationals_MP_Pat_Conaghan_….jpg)

File: 2b03c32b06cc02c⋯.jpg (65.78 KB,1280x720,16:9,Justice_Ian_Harrison.jpg)

>>18676743

NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell scolds Justice Ian Harrison’s Indigenous voice to parliament email to Nationals MP Pat Conaghan

SIMON BENSON, ELLIE DUDLEY and SARAH ISON - MAY 25, 2023

1/2

Nationals MP Pat Conaghan says he will not “walk back” from comments opposing the Indigenous voice to parliament that prompted NSW Supreme Court judge Ian Harrison to label his views “disgusting”, and says he is “proud” of his speech to the lower house this week.

NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell scolded Justice Ian Harrison for sending a highly critical email to Mr Conaghan in which he described the federal MP’s opposition to the voice as racist.

Chief Justice Bell issued a statement on Thursday criticising Justice Harrison’s behaviour, and urging judges to steer away from controversy.

“It is generally prudent for judges to avoid making public statements on topics of political or public controversy,” he said.

“Justice Harrison’s email to Mr Conaghan was not a public statement nor intended for public consumption.”

In a rebuke of Justice Harrison’s comments — put to him in an email on Wednesday — Mr Conaghan stressed the importance of independence in the judiciary and respect in the voice debate.

“In the constitution, there’s a section that talks about the separation of powers… between the judiciary, the parliament and also law enforcement. It’s been a long-held principle that separation of powers should be adhered to,” he told the House of Representatives.

“I would not contemplate telling a police officer how to do his job, nor would I consider in any way criticising or telling a magistrate, judge or justice how to do his or her job, or criticise a decision made whether in sentencing or delivering judgement to a jury.

“These principles are important. As is respect.”

Mr Conaghan said the debate over the voice to parliament was “lacking respect”.

“When those on the yes side criticise those who choose to say no, it simply demonstrates the reason why those who choose to say no will not stand up publicly because they are labeled racist, disgraceful or paternalistic,” he said.

“I urge people on both sides to show respect to one another.

“I will not walk back from my speech. I am proud of what I have said and I am proud moreso of what I have done in this place.”

Mr Conaghan said he supported every member of his community and First Nations people, and fully backed a recognition of Indigenous Australians in the preamble.

“This is not a question about if we should recognise them… this is about a voice to parliament. Let’s not conflate the two issues,” he said.

The Australian on Thursday revealed Justice Harrison had sent the email to Mr Conaghan accusing him of racism because he opposed the voice.

The extraordinary intervention by Justice Harrison has raised concerns about the separation of powers between the judiciary and the workings of parliament.

In the highly charged email sent to Nationals MP Pat Conaghan on Wednesday morning, Ian Harrison, a judge with the NSW Supreme Court, described the federal MP’s views as “disgusting”, paternalistic and racist.

The email was sent in response to a speech to parliament Mr Conaghan had made on Tuesday night in which the member for Cowper had accused those attacking a ‘no’ vote on the basis it denied historical atrocities of being “recklessly dismissive” and would only encourage Australians to vote on emotion rather than logic.

Mr Conaghan, a former solicitor and police officer, told The Australian last night he had contacted senior counsel in NSW after receiving the email. He said counsel had expressed concerns about the constitutional ramifications of the correspondence by a member of the judiciary.

“I was astounded when I received it,” Mr Conaghan said.

“Everyone is entitled to their point of view but I found it extraordinary and when I received it my mind immediately turned to the separation of powers under the same constitution.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900701

File: d0c54240ba3e9f9⋯.jpg (105.79 KB,1024x768,4:3,NSW_Supreme_Court_Chief_Ju….jpg)

File: 5cabbeab3d5e991⋯.jpg (93.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,Justice_Harrison_accused_M….jpg)

>>18900698

2/2

The email by Justice Harrison, sent in his capacity as a judge, was dated May 24 at 8.54am.

In his email to Mr Conaghan, Justice Harrison expressed ­“dismay” at the MP’s speech, ­describing it as the “the lowest ebb in my day”.

“I appreciate that you are a member of Mr (David) Littleproud’s party, one of the first publicly to support the NO vote,” Justice Harrison wrote. “I despaired when he announced that decision, replete as it was with the perpetuation of institutional abuse of Australia’s First Nations people. You (sic) speech last night only increased my despair.

“I am not one of your electors so my opinion on anything has no direct bearing upon you (sic) electoral status. However, I was moved while listening to you speak to write to you now to express my complete sadness, not that you have predictably taken the stand that you have, but that you obviously do not understand or appreciate the depths of paternalism and racism that oozed from your words.

“Your argument is predicated upon the position that the Voice will add nothing practical to the lives of indigenous Australians.

“We can argue about that forever, but I will not do so here. However, what is so subtly disgusting about your contention is that it promotes the counterfeit spectre of harm to the Australian community while ignoring the immense and patently harmless symbolic benefit that recognition of the Voice will give to a long-neglected section of our society.

“There are no sleeping constitutional issues here. It is a simple matter of human decency. Your position, and the position of your party, is niggardly and cruel and mean-spirited. It is patently based upon a political stance that is indecent in its ignorance. May you live long enough, and acquire sufficient wisdom and self-awareness, to be ashamed of yourself.”

The email was signed: “Regards, Ian Harrison”.

Mr Conaghan is a member of the joint select committee for the voice to parliament, which was tasked with examining the government’s proposed wording of the referendum for a voice to parliament and executive government. It concluded that the constitutional alternation bill be passed without amendment, locking in support for the Albanese government’s proposed referendum question.

There were two dissenting reports, one from the Nationals and one from the Liberal Party.

Mr Conaghan on Tuesday night was one of a number of Coalition MPs to speak against the referendum bill. In his speech, he praised Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney for her ­“incredible initiatives” in indigenous-led health outcomes and other outcomes for indigenous Australians. His criticism of the bill was consistent with the Coalition position. “The beauty of our democracy is that we are able to respectfully differ in opinion when it comes to the methods in which our shared goals can be achieved” he said.

“Enhancements and changes to programs and initiatives can be swiftly made without a referendum on constitutional change that divides a nation along the lines of race. Enhancements and changes can be made without the delay that waiting for a referendum requires. Enhancements and changes can be made without the cost of a referendum.

“Positive steps can be taken without unintentionally encouraging Australians to have conversations that contain the words ‘us’ and ‘them’ in place of ‘one’ and ‘all’. “This bill conflates two entirely separate issues: firstly, recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Australian Constitution – a point upon which we all agree and that does not have unforeseen consequences; and secondly, support for a constitutionally enshrined Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander advisory body, a point that is a cause of concern for many.

“These two distinct and separate issues have not been made clear to the Australian public throughout this inquiry and appear to have been designed with that intent.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/judge-nats-mp-racist-over-voice/news-story/dcb50ca321b360486a48eb1ac3f95076

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900712

File: 507591a42b99874⋯.jpg (108.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,Policewoman_Emma_Frizzell_….jpg)

File: 8e0ddc9c87dcf2a⋯.jpg (58.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_chief_prosecutor_Shane….jpg)

>>18708667

Brittany Higgins ‘naked and asleep’ on sofa not enough to charge Bruce Lehrmann with rape, Sofronoff inquiry told

STEPHEN RICE and KRISTIN SHORTEN - MAY 25, 2023

1/2

A police officer investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations has told the Sofronoff inquiry that investigators had not established all three legal requirements necessary to charge Bruce Lehrmann with sexual assault.

In evidence to the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system on Thursday, Senior Constable Emma Frizzell rejected a suggestion by Mark Tedeschi KC, who is representing the Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, that the first requirement was satisfied, namely, that there was “corroboration” that sexual intercourse took place.

Snr Const Frizzell agreed, however, that Ms Higgins was found naked and asleep in Senator Linda Reynolds’ office in Parliament House and that this was “some evidentiary support” of the fact that sexual intercourse took place.

Mark Tedeschi KC, who is representing the Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, asked Sen Constable Frizzell: “Ms Higgins was seen in the complete nude in the minister’s office, asleep and then a Parliament House officer comes into the office at about 2.30 in the morning and sees her in the complete nude asleep.

“Ms Higgins wakes up very briefly and then basically rolls over and goes back to sleep. Do you agree that that is some evidentiary support of the fact that sexual intercourse took place?

Sen Constable Frizzell: “Yes.”

Sen Constable Frizzell also agreed that evidence that Ms Higgins was heavily intoxicated when she arrived at Parliament House supported a second element needed to charge Mr Lehrmann, being a lack of capacity to consent.

However, Constable Frizzell said she did not believe that Mr Lehrmann’s different explanations of why he had gone to Parliament House gave rise to the third element necessary, namely a reasonable suspicion that he knew she had not consented to sexual intercourse.

Mr Tedeschi said Mr Lehrmann had provided four different reasons for why he had gone to Parliament House with Ms Higgins on the morning of March 23, 2019.

“Do you agree that that’s some supportive evidence of either a knowledge of lack of consent or knowledge of recklessness?” he asked the witness.

Sen Constable Frizzell responded: “No”.

Sen Constable Frizzell said she held personal concerns about Ms Higgins’ evidence and that her views remained unchanged after receiving the DPP’s advice that Mr Lehrmann should be charged.

“Regardless, I keep my role as a corroborating case member and I keep investigating it. Whatever my thoughts were irrelevant. The decision to charge was not my role. My role was to corroborate and investigating member of this matter.

“The matter proceeds to court and I just continue with that. I keep investigating the matter and that doesn’t change.”

Senior Constable Frizzell said she continued to assist the DPP during the course of the trial and was not reluctant to do so.

“No, not at all. I had a good working relationship with the likes of (Mitchell) Greig.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900715

File: 7ed5666a035faac⋯.jpg (87.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,Barrister_Mark_Tedeschi_KC….jpg)

>>18900712

2/2

Sen Constable Frizzell, who works in the ACT arm of the AFP’s sexual assault and abuse team (SACAT), was assigned Ms Higgins’ complaint in February 2021.

Sen Constable Frizzell confirmed that in November 2021 she attended a training day at which Crown prosecutor Skye Jerome and Deputy Director of the DPP Andrew Chatterton attended as speakers to discuss changes to sexual offence charging.

She said that the prosecutors said during that training that the standard of proof required to charge suspects in sexual assault cases had changed and advised police that a person providing an evidence in chief interview to police was sufficient evidence to put a charge before the court.

Sen Constable Frizzell clarified that they said that in some cases, but not every case, a police interview would be sufficient to lay charges.

She was told that there was a different, lower and easier test for police to lay a charge compared to the test a DPP must consider before taking a matter to trial.

Sen Constable Frizzell said that advice concerned her if it meant putting matters before the court where there was little to no corroborative evidence.

“I’ve had matters with more evidence than just an interview resulting in not guilty (verdicts) in a court and seeing the effect that that has on a person’s welfare,” she said.

“It concerned me to put something with less evidence to support the allegations (that) would potentially have the same result and how that would impact complainants and their welfare.

“As I said before, in my experience, I haven’t had a matter such as that where I’ve only had complaint evidence.”

Earlier the police officer, who was originally the lead investigator of Ms Higgins’ rape allegation said that she personally sought the complainant’s counselling records.

Sen Constable Frizzell told the inquiry she conducted a “meet and greet” with Ms Higgins before referring her to support services outside of the Australian Federal Police.

“I sought Ms Higgins’ written consent to obtain her counselling records,” she said.

“I requested them and received them.”

During examination by counsel assisting the inquiry Joshua Jones, Sen Constable Frizzell said she did this because Ms Higgins had identified to her that the counselling records contained complaint evidence.

“Why I did that was (because) she listed them out as being part of people that she’d disclosed the incident to.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-naked-and-asleep-on-sofa-not-enough-to-charge-bruce-lehrmann-with-rape-sofronoff-inquiry-told/news-story/5853d203393bdef502d2d08349fed684

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900749

File: 790275c87f2e0fd⋯.jpg (70.34 KB,1240x744,5:3,Ben_Roberts_Smith_leaves_t….jpg)

>>18744643

Ben Roberts-Smith war crimes defamation verdict to be delivered on Thursday 1 June

Australia’s most decorated soldier will learn the outcome of his case against three newspapers over Afghanistan allegations, including the murder of civilians.

Ben Doherty - 25 May 2023

1/2

Ben Roberts-Smith, Australia’s most decorated living soldier, will learn next Thursday if he has won his defamation case against three Australian newspapers over allegations he committed war crimes in Afghanistan.

The judgment, to be delivered by Justice Anthony Besanko in Sydney on 1 June, will be the culmination of a near five-year legal process, after one of the most dramatic and consequential trials in Australian legal and military history.

Roberts-Smith, a former SAS corporal and holder of the Victoria Cross, has been accused by three newspapers of murdering six civilians while on deployment in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012, including kicking a handcuffed prisoner off a cliff before ordering him shot dead.

He has also been accused of machine-gunning an unarmed disabled man to death, of ordering subordinates to execute prisoners, of repeatedly bullying and assaulting comrades, and of committing an act of domestic violence against a woman with whom he was having an affair.

Roberts-Smith denies the allegations, and all wrongdoing. He has sued the Age, the Sydney Morning Herald and the Canberra Times alleging their reporting defamed him, wrongly portraying him as a war criminal and murderer who who “broke the moral and legal rules of military engagement”.

Roberts-Smith’s lawyers told court his accusers were fabulists and fantasists, failed soldiers embittered by their own “cowardice”, and a “corrosive jealousy” towards their comrade’s successes.

Giving evidence as the first witness before the federal court, Roberts-Smith said the Victoria Cross he won for spectacular bravery in 2010 was not an honour he sought, but, ultimately, a burden “thrust upon him”.

“It put a target on my back,” he told the court.

Whichever side loses the case may face up to $25m in costs. If Roberts-Smith wins, he is likely to be awarded many millions more in damages.

Roberts-Smith took out a loan from his employer, the media baron Kerry Stokes, to run the defamation action: if he loses, he has offered his Victoria Cross as collateral.

But the judgment may not be a straightforward decision one way or the other. The judge could find the newspapers were successful in proving some of the allegations on the balance of probabilities – the civil standard – but not others. If so, the judgment is likely to be a balancing act weighing up the damage to Roberts-Smith’s reputation of the unproven allegations against those that were proven.

Should the judge find the allegations against Roberts-Smith proven, his barrister Arthur Moses told the court, it “would paint Mr Roberts-Smith as a murderer … a violent person and a domestic violence abuser.

“It would indelibly and permanently tarnish his standing and good name.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900753

File: 4ee9685b41608ec⋯.jpg (293.04 KB,1632x1224,4:3,Australian_soldier_Ben_Rob….jpg)

>>18900749

2/2

For the newspapers, beyond the calamitous financial impact, a loss could be expected to seriously dent their appetite – and that of the Australian media more generally – for public interest investigations.

The outcome will be felt more broadly still. Details of Australia’s unsuccessful 20-year campaign in Afghanistan have been laid bare in open court; ministers of the crown have been subpoenaed to give evidence; media empires have been pitched in scarcely concealed conflict; and institutions such as the Australian War Memorial, which still hosts a display dedicated to Roberts-Smith, have been drawn in.

Within Australia’s military hierarchy, questions have been raised of the command responsibility of senior officers, and of the more-distant decision makers who repeatedly sent the same small cohort of soldiers to the ill-defined front lines of a distant war to fight an elusive, indistinct enemy.

The trial also exposed a spiteful factionalism within Australia’s usually secretive SAS regiment. It pitted comrades against each other: in some cases, former best friends gave irreconcilable evidence.

And there remains a broader criminal context.

Already, one member of the Australian SAS has been charged with the war crime of murder arising from his conduct in Afghanistan. Former trooper Oliver Schulz’s case is before the courts in NSW. He potentially faces life imprisonment if found guilty.

The Australian government’s Office of the Special Investigator is examining “between 40 and 50” further allegations of war crimes committed by special forces troops in Afghanistan.

The criminal investigations follow a four-year inquiry by Maj Gen Paul Brereton, a judge of the New South Wales court of appeal, for the Inspector General of the Australian Defence Force.

Released in 2020, the Brereton report found “credible” evidence of allegations 25 Australian soldiers murdered 39 Afghan civilians, in some cases executing detained non-combatants to “blood” junior soldiers before inventing cover stories and planting weapons on corpses.

None of the killings could be attributed to the “fog of war”, Brereton said, describing the actions as a “disgraceful and a profound betrayal” of the Australian military.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/25/ben-roberts-smith-war-crimes-defamation-verdict-to-be-delivered-on-thursday-1-june

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900789

File: 27b3e6ad93e120c⋯.jpg (102.57 KB,1250x692,625:346,Federal_police_officers_es….jpg)

Melbourne couple allegedly kept domestic slave at Point Cook home

Marta Pascual Juanola - May 24, 2023

A couple have been charged with modern-day slavery offences after they allegedly kept a woman as a domestic slave at their home in Melbourne’s south-western suburbs for about 10 months.

A healthcare worker raised the alarm with authorities last October after noticing the woman was “exhibiting indicators of human trafficking”.

Australian Federal Police alleges the woman was kept in domestic servitude at the Point Cook home from January and until October 2022, when federal officers swooped on the property following the tip-off.

Officers allege the 44-year-old man and 29-year-old woman exercised coercive control over the victim, limited her movements and physically assaulted her.

They have been charged with possessing a slave, using coercion and threats to cause a person to enter and remain in servitude, and exercising control over a slave. They will appear in Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday.

If convicted, they each face a maximum penalty of 25 years in prison.

AFP Detective Superintendent Simone Butcher said federal officers relied on members of the community such as healthcare professionals to report suspected cases of modern slavery, including child labour, forced marriage, debt bondage, forced labour and servitude.

“Everyone can play a role in stopping human trafficking. We encourage anyone who suspects human trafficking or sees something suspicious to report it,” Butcher said.

“Without the assistance of the community – in this case healthcare professionals – victims might go undetected, and we would not be able to provide victims the help and support they need.”

Butcher said AFP actively trained first responders, healthcare professionals and members of the public to identify signs of human trafficking and slavery.

A Global Slavery Index report released in London on Wednesday found the number of people living in modern slavery in Australia had more than doubled in the past four years amid a rise in the number of migrant workers coming to the country to ease labour shortages getting exploited.

While Australia has better protections than other nations in the Asia Pacific region and globally, the report commissioned by international human rights group Walk Free estimated that on any given day in 2021, there were 41,000 people living in modern slavery nationwide.

For more information on human trafficking and the signs to look for, visit the AFP Human trafficking website:

https://www.afp.gov.au/what-we-do/crime-types/human-trafficking

https://www.afp.gov.au/what-we-do/crime-types/human-trafficking/human-trafficking-slavery-indicators

If you or someone you know is a victim of human trafficking or slavery offences, you can make a report to the AFP by calling 131AFP (131 237). You can also use the AFP online form to report human trafficking, slavery and slavery-like practices (including forced marriage):

https://forms.afp.gov.au/online_forms/human_trafficking_form

Information and confidential advice is also available from the Australian Red Cross, by calling (03) 9345 1800 or visiting its website:

https://www.redcross.org.au/get-help/help-for-migrants-in-transition/trafficked-people

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/melbourne-couple-allegedly-kept-domestic-slave-at-point-cook-home-20230524-p5dayy.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900794

File: c122045a3d3051f⋯.jpg (101.18 KB,1001x683,1001:683,Angie_Yeh_Ling_Liaw_left_a….jpg)

File: d3b756f482cc371⋯.jpg (114.84 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Police_escorting_one_of_th….jpg)

>>18900789

Point Cook couple faces court accused of harbouring a slave

Erin Pearson - May 25, 2023

A Point Cook couple has faced court accused of keeping a slave in a western suburbs home after medical staff contacted police with concerns a woman may have been a victim of human trafficking.

Angie Yeh Ling Liaw, 29, and Chee Kit Chong, 44 – also known as Max Chong – faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday charged with three slavery-related offences.

They include allegations the married couple possessed a slave and used coercion and threats to control the female at their home in Melbourne’s west.

Liaw’s lawyer Payne Wu asked magistrate Andrew McKenna to adjourn the matter to a hearing next month as his legal firm was working to determine whether it could represent both husband and wife, or whether conflicts of interest may arise.

The court heard while Chong was charged in November, his wife was not charged until April after the police case was reviewed.

McKenna also questioned whether the alleged victim now faced being deported or placed on a proper visa to allow her to remain in the Australia.

Police said the couple were charged with modern-day slavery offences after allegedly keeping a female victim in domestic servitude at their Point Cook home between January and October 2022.

An Australian Federal Police spokesperson said officers began investigating the case late last year after receiving a tip-off from healthcare staff, who raised concerns about a woman they believed may have been trafficked.

Search warrants were executed on a home in Point Cook on October 27, before Chong was charged with possessing a slave, using coercion and threats to cause another person to enter into and remain in servitude, and exercising control over a slave.

Liaw was charged in April with the same three offences.

Investigators allege the couple exercised coercive control over the other woman while subjecting her to physical assaults and controlling her movements.

McKenna ordered the pair, who remain on bail, to return to court in June.

The court heard medical staff who came into contact with the victim could be among witnesses to give evidence at a later hearing

If convicted, Chong and Liaw each face up to 25 years in jail.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/point-cook-couple-faces-court-accused-of-harbouring-a-slave-20230525-p5db51.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900811

File: ef1d0a154c053ba⋯.jpg (124.24 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Hollingworth_arrives….jpg)

>>18744576

>>18835321

Peter Hollingworth will never officiate in Australia as Anglican church body dumps plans to appeal inquiry findings

JOHN FERGUSON - MAY 25, 2023

Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth will never officiate in the Anglican Church anywhere in Australia after investigators threatened to appeal a board decision to allow him to have a limited role in services.

The Anglican diocese of Melbourne’s Professional Standards Committee has revealed it was preparing to appeal the board findings that would have paved the way for Dr Hollingworth to officiate in a qualified way in Melbourne.

The PSC has detailed how it was considering appealing the internal board findings because it had concerns over several aspects of its decision making.

The Anglican Professional Standards Board - which sits above the committee - found Dr Hollingworth guilty of seven counts of misconduct over his handling of the child sex abuse issue while he was archbishop of Brisbane more than 20 years ago.

But the board did not defrock Dr Hollingworth or strip him of the right to officiate; the committee had sought for the former governor-general to lose the right to officiate and says it submitted that it was open for the board to recommend his removal from holy orders.

But on May 12, Dr Hollingworth announced his intention to return his permission to officiate and this was accepted by the church on May 19.

On May 23, at the request of the committee, Dr Hollingworth gave an undertaking he would not apply in the future for a permission to officiate anywhere in Australia.

‘’In light of Dr Hollingworth’s relinquishment of his permission to officiate and his undertaking never to apply for one in the future, the committee has determined not to appeal the decision of the board,’’ it said in a statement.

‘’This matter highlights that it is essential that persons who hold positions of responsibility within the Anglican Church must act responsibly, reasonably, appropriately and sensitively when responding to reports of child sexual abuse.

‘’This is the standard expected of all and is necessary to ensure protection of the community, including its most vulnerable members.’’

The church set up a marathon process to investigate complaints against Dr Hollingworth that took at least five years to be finalised.

Dr Hollingworth, 88, who has had poor health, was deeply upset by the publicity that has dogged him for more than 20 years but a series of survivors have campaigned for the church to deal fully with his mistakes.

The Australian in April revealed that Dr Hollingworth had detailed clear knowledge of the harms caused by pedophiles nearly 30 years ago, contradicting a finding of the PSB that allowed him to retain his ministry.

The protocol showed Dr Hollingworth had known while archbishop of Brisbane that victims of abuse suffered at the hands of paedophiles.

There were two senior clergy that Dr Hollingworth allowed to remain in ministry despite evidence they had been sex offenders.

A paper trail was discovered of his decision-making that enabled investigators to closely examine the efficacy of his management of the abuse crisis. Dr Hollingworth did not commit abuse but was found to have severely mismanaged the crisis.

Just over 20 years ago he was appointed governor-general of Australia, with his handling of the crisis plaguing him until he was forced out of the job.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/exgg-will-never-officiate-in-australia-as-church-body-dumps-plans-to-appeal-inquiry-findings/news-story/aa8fc8f1563a3648b25be6edb4ba29fb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900821

File: 5d980f8d8715654⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,5396x3597,5396:3597,Home_Affairs_Minister_Clar….jpg)

>>18876559

Australia, Five Eyes partners blame China for malicious hacking campaign

Matthew Knott - May 25, 2023

1/2

Australia and its fellow Five Eyes security partners have called out China for a major state-sponsored hacking operation targeting critical infrastructure networks in the United States.

Technology giant Microsoft, which uncovered the hack, said the campaign had been active since the middle of 2021 and targeted critical infrastructure assets in Guam, an island in the west Pacific Ocean that is home to some of America’s most important military bases.

Guam would be expected to play an important role in any future conflict between the US and China over the self-governing island of Taiwan.

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil said: “The Australian government has joined with a number of other security agencies from around the world to advise that there have been evidence-based attacks on critical infrastructure associated with the United States and that the origin of those attacks has been the Chinese government”.

O’Neil, the minister responsible for cybersecurity, said she was not concerned naming China would disrupt the government’s efforts to rebuild relations with Beijing and achieve the removal of trade sanctions on Australian goods.

“The Australian government is never going to compromise on our national security and this activity should not be occurring,” she told ABC radio.

“There’s no question about that and we’re not going to be shy when we know who is responsible for that activity.”

Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said: “This is a particularly malign behaviour to target civilian infrastructure like this, and it’s not acceptable … There’s no doubt in my mind that if this is happening in US critical infrastructure networks, then it’s happening on our networks too.”

Paterson welcomed the government’s decision to publicly attribute the behaviour to China but called on it to go further by using the Magnitsky sanctions regime to penalise people who engage in offensive cyber activity against Australia.

Five Eyes law enforcement leaders recently told The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age that China poses the gravest threat to the security of Australia and its allies as Australian Federal Police commissioner Reece Kershaw refused to be drawn on the Chinese government’s activities.

FBI deputy director Paul Abbate said China “poses a grave danger to each of our countries, our way of life, our democracies and the freedoms that we value so much”, accusing Beijing of involvement in the “sweeping theft of intellectual property, research and development from each of our Five Eye countries” along with industrial-scale cyber hacking and the “transnational repression” of critics abroad.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900825

File: 8765980e66139fc⋯.jpg (213.57 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_front_entrance_sign_fo….jpg)

>>18900821

2/2

Microsoft said the “stealthy and targeted malicious activity” had been carried out by Volt Typhoon, a state-sponsored actor based in China that typically focuses on espionage and information gathering.

“Microsoft assesses with moderate confidence that this Volt Typhoon campaign is pursuing development of capabilities that could disrupt critical communications infrastructure between the United States and Asia region during future crises,” the company said.

Microsoft said the hacking campaign had “affected organisations spanning the communications, manufacturing, utility, transportation, construction, maritime, government, information technology, and education sectors”.

“Observed behaviour suggests that the threat actor intends to perform espionage and maintain access without being detected for as long as possible,” Microsoft said.

Cybersecurity agencies from the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing nations – Australia, the US, New Zealand, Canada and the United Kingdom – issued a joint advisory note on Thursday morning saying they wanted to “highlight a recently discovered cluster of activity of interest associated with a People’s Republic of China state-sponsored cyber actor, also known as Volt Typhoon”.

“Private sector partners have identified that this activity affects networks across US critical infrastructure sectors, and the authoring agencies believe the actor could apply the same techniques against these and other sectors worldwide,” the agencies, including the Australian Signals Directorate, said.

The agencies published the code of the malicious program to help make private companies and government agencies aware of how to identify it.

Alastair MacGibbon, the former head of the Australian Cyber Security Centre, said the revelations were a “wake-up call” for critical infrastructure operators about threats to their networks.

MacGibbon, now chief strategy officer at CyberCX, said the distinctive feature of this attack was that it was a so-called “living off the land” operation, which can allow intruders to dwell undetected in the victim’s device for weeks, months or even years.

“This is not a smash-and-grab operation to grab code or a ransomware attack; it’s a very stealthy, sophisticated method of staying inside a period for long-term surveillance.

“You do that if you want to eventually degrade or destroy those systems.”

He said the prevailing thesis among experts was that China may have sought to disable US military systems on Guam in the case of a conflict fought over Taiwan.

https:// www. smh. com. au/ politics/ federal/ australia- five- eyes- partners- blame- china- for- malicious- hacking- campaign- 20230 525-p5d b4v. html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18900833

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18719485

>>18876559

>>18900821

Five countries secretly sharing intelligence say China is the No.1 threat

60 Minutes Australia

May 21, 2023

Showing off deadly weaponry in massive war games is a tactic China and the United States both use to try to avoid full-on combat. But the truth is the two countries, as well as other nations including Australia, are already battling it out in an invisible war. There are no frontline soldiers but there are significant skirmishes. Until now these conflicts have been kept quiet, but key members of a secretive alliance of top cops from Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand are about to change that. In exclusive interviews with Nick McKenzie, the group known as the “Five Eyes” disclose startling information about the trouble they’re seeing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Z3naJbfuDE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18905818

File: 28553ff81285556⋯.jpg (95.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,Noel_Pearson_appears_befor….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18865807

>>18874922

Noel Pearson reveals he prays Australians ‘will support the Indigenous voice to parliament by a majority of voters in a majority of the states’

NOEL PEARSON - MAY 20, 2023

1/2

Rugby Australia’s statement on the Indigenous voice to parliament this week is the one I’ve been waiting for. This is the game of Mark, Glen and Gary, the heroes of my youth. And that tower of steel, the magnificent fourth brother: Lloyd Walker.

Mark Ella’s book Running Rugby is the leadership bible of my public life. More than the playbook for the most exciting rugby there is, it is first and foremost a metaphor for how to play life.

I have prayed desperately for more than two decades for two things. The first for Eddie Jones to be returned to his rightful place as coach of the Wallabies. Having been exiled from his homeland to the great cost of our country and code, the master coach is back and I for one could not be more excited. If Rugby Australia chairman Hamish McLennan’s genius footwork off-field is matched on-field, we are going to give this year’s World Cup a shake.

The second prayer was that one day we would have a referendum to amend the Australian Constitution to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as the First Peoples of Australia. The first meeting I had on the subject was hosted by CEO John Hartigan in the boardroom at News Corporation headquarters at Holt Street in Sydney’s Surry Hills. Hartigan had been a long-time supporter of reconciliation.

When Chris Mitchell led this masthead he convened a balanced debate on constitutional recognition within a broader and consistent coverage of Indigenous affairs. It was for two decades often the only media outlet publishing stories and engaging in the vexed issues confronting the country concerning its Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Chris Kenny and then legal affairs writer Chris Merritt were early supporters. Greg Sheridan and Paul Kelly were early opponents. Australian Catholic University vice-chancellor Greg Craven first denounced the expert panel’s proposal for a non-discrimination clause in the Constitution as a “one-line bill of rights”.

He subsequently joined with me, Marcia Langton and Julian Leeser in proposing to then prime minister Tony Abbott an alternative proposal for a body to advise parliament on the views of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. This was to be constitutionally recognised while giving parliament the power to determine its functions and representation. Professor Anne Twomey provided the drafting of a potential clause.

For a long time this paper was the only media outlet engaged in this discussion.

Merritt has since changed sides and is a shrill opponent whose lurid denunciations of the voice proposal stand directly at odds with his previous support. He is the putative head of a certain Rule of Law Institute. I would have thought fundamental to the rule of law is its consistency, rather than its malleability according to one’s changing circumstances and loyalties.

It’s fair to say that since former Institute of Public Affairs chairwoman Janet Albrechtsen started her crusade against the voice, the opinions in this broadsheet are more numerously antipathetic to the voice than not. Albrechtsen regurgitates her arguments repetitively and they are the same lines she ran when she was an IPA official. The IPA is behind the No campaign.

Indigenous leaders Warren Mundine and now opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Price are just a front for the Centre for Independent Studies and the IPA think tanks. They are just glove puppets. The voice is Indigenous but the words are scripted by the clever children of the IPA. The fists inside the puppets punching down on Indigenous people are white.

This is not fiction or a slur. It is the truth.

Price was gearing up for this campaign for several years as a fellow of the CIS, well before she entered parliament. Albrechtsen even touted her as a future PM.

The IPA has never been a worthwhile organisation but it is a pity about the CIS. Under former director Greg Lindsay it was an important intellectual voice for liberalism whose policy production was worth considering and often on point. Under Helen Hughes its research and commentaries on Indigenous policy were important contributions to the national debate.

Even today its education program led by Glenn Fahey is head and shoulders above anything else produced by universities and other think tanks. That the CIS, under director Tom Switzer, would depart from its usual practice of abjuring politically motivated ideological extremism like the IPA is as unexpected as it is disappointing.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18905820

File: c8100ab3bb39fe7⋯.jpg (108.78 KB,768x1024,3:4,The_Weekend_Australian_Mag….jpg)

>>18905818

2/2

The boomer readership of this paper is of course antipathetic to recognition. They are mostly obscurant and borderline casual racists in their views. Just read the comments at the bottom of this piece. If the referendum relied on these readers then we would have no chance.

But Australia is moving on. The change that is needed to secure recognition of Australia’s First Peoples is happening beyond that group of boomers who want this to be about the culture wars. The problem is that too many party activists and parliamentary candidates and members of the Liberal and National parties want to recreate America in Australia.

The extreme polarisation of politics in the US is sought to be imported to this country. There are Australians who would like Trump and MAGA-style politics to become the politics of Australia.

This referendum will test us. It will test whether the paranoid style of American politics will become the politics of our country.

On Thursday the board of Rugby Australia issued its statement in support of recognition: “The Voice is not about Division. It’s about Union.”

In doing so it joined the National Rugby League and Australian Football League in supporting the referendum and urging their members and supporters to think seriously about their vote. RA’s statement is a most worthy response to the Uluru Statement from the Heart. It’s no mere press release. It too speaks from the heart. Even sceptics should take the time to read and consider it.

The Yes and No cases will be published for all voters in due course. Those preparing the Yes case will find inspiration in RA’s statement this week.

Former prime ministers John Howard and Abbott urged the sporting codes to stay out of the referendum debate. Especially Rugby Union. To its credit, RA has resisted their intimidation.

Whatever respect we have for Howard’s successful prime ministership and whatever ongoing dismay we have for Abbott’s failed prime ministership, they are both wrong in their attempt to silence the sporting codes. RA, the NRL and the AFL are showing moral courage where Abbott is showing why it was a good thing that Malcolm Turnbull terminated his prime ministership and the people of Warringah rejected his parliamentary representation.

The decision of the football codes in support of recognition and reconciliation against the political objections of the Liberal and National parties shows the gulf between politicians and people. You can exclaim all you like about wokeness. This is where people show the leadership that politicians won’t.

My two prayers were answered. The coach is back. The referendum is on. Now I have a third prayer. The long campaign has not started yet. It will start in earnest when the referendum bill passes the parliament.

Even though I’m a rusted-on Randwick voter I believe the people of Warringah will support the referendum. I believe that the people of Australia will support the Indigenous voice to parliament by a majority of voters in a majority of the states.

Noel Pearson is a director of Cape York Partnership and Good to Great Schools Australia.

Note from the Editor-in-Chief

Our masthead has had a long association with Noel Pearson. We have published his words over many decades. And we recognise his position as an architect of the voice. However, we disagree with a great deal of what he has written today.

The Australian has been diligent in covering all sides of the referendum debate. We do this because the contest of ideas is central to our values and because Indigenous affairs are a touchstone for us as the national broadsheet.

As Chris Kenny writes in Inquirer today, “voters confront a historically heavy responsibility” in the coming referendum. Part of that responsibility is to engage with the issues in a considered, thoughtful way.

The Australian stands by the professionalism and integrity of our writers. We reject Mr Pearson’s characterisation of our readers as “borderline casual racists”.

And we call on all participants to be civil and to respect differences of opinion.

Michelle Gunn, Editor-in-Chief

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/the-people-will-show-the-leadership-our-leaders-lack/news-story/0d645cf9121dc73d74a3a13f4eb28538

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18905833

File: b748823c1bfd06e⋯.jpg (96.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Noel_Pearson_attends_the_w….jpg)

File: 6a57ba4ccd85b0e⋯.jpg (75.02 KB,768x1024,3:4,Barrister_Louise_Clegg.jpg)

>>18676743

>>18874922

>>18905818

Name-calling Noel Pearson misses the point about shifting support

CHRIS MERRITT - MAY 26, 2023

1/2

Last weekend, Noel Pearson added my name to his naughty list. My offence from his perspective has been to change sides on the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament and the executive.

He wrote in this newspaper that I had become a “shrill” opponent “whose lurid denunciations of the voice proposal stand directly at odds with his previous support”.

Pearson deserves to have his say. And given his impressive lexicon of abuse, I got off lightly.

At least I’m not a bed-wetter, which is how he described “Little Mickey Gooda”, a crybaby (Greg Craven), an undertaker (Peter Dutton), or caught up in a redneck celebrity vortex (Jacinta Nampijinpa Price).

But an implicit charge of hypocrisy requires a response. And it’s this: Pearson accuses me of changing my position on the voice. But the real change has been to the voice itself.

Until last July, when Anthony Albanese unveiled his preliminary wording for the proposed new chapter of the Constitution, the design of the voice was unsettled. Various options were being considered.

This can be seen from the 2017 final report of the Referendum Council whose main recommendation for the voice was far more modest than the government’s final version.

Eight years ago I saw nothing wrong with requiring parliament to listen to Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders before using its power under section 51(26) of the Constitution to make special laws that only affect Indigenous people. I still hold that view.

In February, barrister Louise Clegg delivered an address to the Uphold & Recognise think tank that makes it clear that Murray Gleeson, a former chief justice of the High Court, favoured such a targeted approach as late as 2019.

Clegg quotes Gleeson, a member of the Referendum Council, as writing: “It is difficult to see any objection in principle to the creation of a body to advise parliament about proposed laws relating to Indigenous affairs, and specifically about special laws enacted under the race power which, in its practical operation, is now a power to make laws about Indigenous people.”

This early model is what many people believe they are being asked to endorse. They are wrong.

This is not what is on offer at this referendum.

It is therefore a little harsh for Pearson to criticise me for not supporting a proposal whose preliminary wording was only made public last July and is dramatically different to the principle I favoured eight years ago.

The change proposed by Gleeson would have been difficult to oppose. It would still have required constitutional change but the voice would have been focused on providing advice on laws that relate only to Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders.

The government is asking us to go beyond that and endorse a change that would undermine equality of citizenship.

It would do this by extending the scope of the voice beyond Gleeson’s tight focus on laws that relate only to Indigenous people. I did not support this eight years ago and I do not support it now.

We are being asked to constitutionalise a race-based lobby group, paid for by taxpayers, that could involve itself not just in debates on Indigenous affairs, but in debates about all matters of public policy, all proposed laws and all administrative decisions.

That extended scope means we are being asked to constitutionalise a system of racial preference.

Extending the jurisdiction of the voice beyond Indigenous affairs, as proposed by the government, cannot be reconciled by the idea that all Australians should be equal not just before the law, but before those who make the law and those who apply the law.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18905838

File: cf43302f0b9adb9⋯.jpg (85.39 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_High_Court_chief_ju….jpg)

File: 06c2c1db4ff7cbe⋯.jpg (142.36 KB,1280x720,16:9,Professor_Megan_Davis.jpg)

>>18905833

2/2

It is perfectly logical for Indigenous people to have a say before parliament makes special laws on the basis of race that affect them alone.

But moving beyond that would give one group of Australians an entitlement to additional and unjustified influence over all public policy, all law making and all public administration.

If the government had wanted to focus the voice on Indigenous affairs, or on matters that relate only to Indigenous people or even primarily to Indigenous people, it would have included such qualifications in the words that would be inserted into the Constitution.

It has not done so. And that is exactly what voice proponents want.

On January 23 Pearson told Patricia Karvelas on ABC radio: “There is hardly any subject matter that Indigenous people would not be affected by and would not want to provide their advice to parliament.”

Indigenous constitutional lawyer Megan Davis, who helped develop the voice, shares this view. On December 21 last year she was asked on ABC television what issues Indigenous Australians wanted to talk about to parliament through the voice.

Davis’s answer: “At this point, virtually every issue.”

Long before Pearson sought to belittle him as a crybaby, Craven was one of the country’s most distinguished constitutional lawyers. He was one of the original architects of the voice.

On March 18 he wrote in this newspaper:

“There has been a distinct sleight of hand here in the development of the voice model. Originally it was a conservative product designed precisely to avoid judicial activism.

“But over the past year, groups of mainly Indigenous activists have worked to transform the model into precisely the opposite.”

The most surprising aspect of Pearson’s remarks is that they were so long in coming.

I explained my concerns to him privately months ago, only to be dismissed as a “liberal democracy purist”.

Equality of citizenship is fundamental to what it means to live in a democracy. We should never vote for its abolition.

Chris Merritt is vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/namecalling-noel-pearson-misses-the-point-about-shifting-support/news-story/c99da754ac8667c9a035a1ac8b283aee

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18905902

File: 66f8dd7ded2f145⋯.jpg (100 KB,1280x720,16:9,Cape_York_leader_and_archi….jpg)

File: ab4963f8b9c0164⋯.jpg (127.02 KB,768x1024,3:4,Mick_Gooda.jpg)

File: efafa7c0ee8d091⋯.jpg (64.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,Marcia_Langton.jpg)

>>18676743

>>18874922

>>18905818

‘Secret weapon’ Noel Pearson’s vitriol only helps the ‘No’ campaign in the Indigenous voice to parliament debate

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - MAY 26, 2023

1/2

Well, folks, today we delve into some treasured secrets from the Indigenous voice to parliament No campaign. Yes, their best secret weapons are Noel Pearson and, admittedly a distant second, Marcia Langton.

When No voters say their evening prayers they must surely be throwing in a request to God to let Pearson go on Patricia Karvelas’s radio show the next morning to let rip at his enemies or, even better, his friends.

No campaigners know that every piece of epic abuse Pearson showers on them is worth its weight in gold when it comes to campaign donations and voting intentions.

Australians hate polysyllabic insults of any kind but particularly despise a walking encyclopaedia like Pearson dumping on an idealistic woman such as Jacinta Price or an amiable and well-intentioned one-time friend such as Mick Gooda.

Price is, according to Pearson, caught up in a “tragic redneck celebrity vortex”. Gooda was accused of “bed wetting” for committing the mortal sin of canvassing compromise. Pearson described Father Frank Brennan, a highly regarded – but, in Pearson’s eyes, unduly moderate – campaigner for Indigenous Australians as setting himself up “as some kind of final arbiter of what is good for the natives”.

Pearson’s question about whether Jewish MP Julian Leeser “expects us to wear a tattoo identifying ourselves as Indigenous” was so sickeningly intemperate that even Pearson realised he’d crossed a line.

Every time Noel says something like this, more undecided voters might ask themselves “would I want this man running the voice?” and shift into the No side of the ledger.

So Noel, the No campaign salutes you and says please do keep going. Indeed, some of your recent efforts were so far below your usual standards, we need you to substantially lift your game.

For example, I was personally distraught that the worst you could say about me in your column in The Weekend Australian was that I “regurgitate (my) arguments repetitively and they were the same lines (I) ran when” I was an IPA official. Apart from this being factually untrue, it’s so lame.

How can I hold my head high at weekly meetings of my coven of eastern suburbs cross burners when that is the worst Pearson can say about me? What do I have to do to attract insults more in keeping with Pearson’s stellar achievements in the bile-venting department? Desecrate graves? A little satanic animal sacrifice? Barrack for Manly?

Seriously, Noel, all my friends will desert me if that is the worst you can say about me.

Now of course I’m guessing that you are saying much worse about me in private – legend has it your use of the English language behind closed doors is spectacularly colourful – but that doesn’t count. You actually have to come out and say it on national media. Come on, PK will always give you airtime for a good spray.

I should acknowledge that a few lines in Pearson’s piece in The Weekend Australian were up to his usual standards. Having called Jacinta Price “just a front” for the Centre for Independent Studies and the IPA, he continued: “The voice is Indigenous but the words are scripted by the clever children of the IPA. The fists inside the puppets punching down on Indigenous people are white.”

This was pretty good, Noel, but to borrow some of the loveable rugby analogies you were so keen to claim in your piece last week, it came too late in the second half to make a difference. You’ve got to play the full 80 minutes, Noel, if you really want to deliver a lot of No votes.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18905915

File: c22877a93933052⋯.jpg (49.62 KB,768x1024,3:4,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

File: e805e319426ff4f⋯.jpg (192.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Pat_Anderson_Noel_Pearson_….jpg)

>>18905902

2/2

While Pearson is the standout performer, we should also recognise Langton’s contribution to the No case, even if it was accidental.

When Langton warned Australians in a recent interview for The Weekend Australian that if Australians were so ungrateful as to vote No, they could forget about asking an Indigenous person to do a welcome to country, she was deluged by comments begging her to confirm that a No vote meant no more welcomes to country.

What Langton accidentally exposed is that while many Australians are happy to tolerate a welcome to country if they have to, they do it for the benefit, and as a recognition, of Indigenous Australians. They don’t do it for their own benefit – hence Langton shouldn’t feel she needs to perform a welcome to country for non-Indigenous Australians.

But don’t let us stop you, Marcia: keep threatening Australians with the end of welcome to country if the No vote gets up. The No campaign must be praying for more of these own-goal threats.

Lest I am too harsh on Pearson and Langton, I do need to praise their flexibility and ability to adapt. No need to be hidebound by slavish adherence to principle – as the old saying goes, “consistency is the essence of mediocrity”.

Langton, for example, famously wrote or, to be more accurate, co-wrote with Tom Calma, in paragraph 2.9 of the Calma-Langton Report on the proposed design of the voice, that in order to “respect parliamentary sovereignty and avoid causing unintended consequences”, “all elements would be non-justiciable meaning alignment with the standards could not be challenged in court”.

More recently, Langton has admitted the voice would be a matter for the courts. Specifically, when asked if High Court challenges could be used to delay government decisions until the voice had deliberated on a matter, she said: “That’s a possibility – why wouldn’t we want that to be the case?”

That’s quite a turnaround on what was an important starting principle for the voice. What else will change?

The last word for consistent adherence to principle though has to go to Noel Pearson.

And, again, it is because without wanting to, he makes the best possible arguments for the No case.

In 2012, Pearson wrote: “As long as the allowance of racial discrimination remains in our Constitution, it continues, in both subtle and unsubtle ways, to affect our relationships with each other. Though it has historically hurt my people more than others, racial categorisations dehumanise us all. It dehumanises us because we are each individuals, and we should be judged as individuals. We should be rewarded on our merits and assisted in our needs. Race should not matter.”

Amen to that. Noel, the No case thanks you.

Janet Albrechtsen is an opinion columnist with The Australian. She has worked as a solicitor in commercial law, and attained a Doctorate of Juridical Studies from the University of Sydney. She has written for numerous other publications including the Australian Financial Review, The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Sunday Age, and The Wall Street Journal.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/pearsons-vitriol-only-helps-the-no-campaign-against-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/e6304ac784f80c1bb701b8a5ed4de81c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18905989

File: c20d8268a0ccd49⋯.mp4 (15.94 MB,640x360,16:9,Aussie_sporting_legends_un….mp4)

>>18676743

>>18840266

>>18865807

Australia’s sport codes unite in support of Indigenous voice to parliament

In a rare show of unity, all of Australia’s major sport codes have come together in support of one significant cause.

Samuel Clench - May 26, 2023

1/2

Australia’s sport codes have united in an extraordinary show of support for the Indigenous voice to parliament, advocating for a nation that “values equity and fairness”.

Twenty-one organisations, including all the major sports, have signed an open letter to Australians expressing support for the voice.

The letter was followed on Friday morning with a historic gathering of sporting royalty at separate events in Sydney and Melbourne.

The organisations involved included: the AFL, Cricket Australia, the NRL, Rugby Australia, Tennis Australia, Netball Australia, Football Australia, Motorsport Australia, the NBL, Golf Australia, the PGA of Australia, Australian Taekwondo, Badminton Australia, Baseball Australia, Boxing Australia, Deaf Sport Australia, No Limit Boxing, Sport Inclusion Australia, NRL Touch Football Australia, Triathlon Australia and Wheelchair Rugby League Australia.

Australians will vote on whether to alter the constitution to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice later this year.

Rugby league legend Mal Meninga on Friday voiced his passionate support for the campaign while speaking to news.com.au from the Sydney event.

“I feel privileged,” he said. “I think it’s a celebration and it’s a significant issue in Australian history.

“I can’t see anything wrong with it — listening to the voice of the First Nations people. Learning from them and learning from their past and taking action with them.

“This is not a case of doing this for them or on behalf of them. It’s about taking action with them and I think that’s generally how we operate in spot. You bring your team along with you. You act collectively to achieve success. I can see great benefit in it.

“If you know your history, this should have been done 100 years ago.”

The open letter is addressed to the “sports fans of Australia”, and stresses that sport “has always served as a unifying force for our diverse Australian society”.

“Regardless of where we come from or what we believe in, sport brings people together in the spirit of achievement, community and celebration,” it reads.

“Moreover, sport plays a significant role in reconciling Australia. It has long been a means for the inclusion and celebration of the incredible achievements of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

“This year, all Australians will have their say in a referendum to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the constitution by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice. We, as a collective, support recognition through a voice.

“We believe our nation can achieve this profound recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the first peoples of our country, in our constitution. And that we should do that by ensuring Indigenous Australians have a meaningful say in shaping their own future.

“We commit to using our platforms to lead conversations that promote respect, trust and goodwill between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. We commit to improving education and understanding among the Australians who play, administer and watch our sports.

“We encourage all Australians who love sport to listen with an open heart and an open mind through this historic moment.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18905999

File: c12be5cff25f563⋯.jpg (1.39 MB,1138x1774,569:887,OPEN_LETTER_TO_SPORTS_FANS.jpg)

File: f5baff891efb3d2⋯.jpg (142.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mal_Meninga_Eddie_Betts_Ca….jpg)

File: b803d469348cb71⋯.jpg (85.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Rugby_league_great_Mal_Men….jpg)

File: f33fd5bd34ba15d⋯.jpg (95.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,So_is_cricketer_Alyssa_Hea….jpg)

>>18905989

2/2

The letter stresses that the organisations respect “everyone is entitled to reach their own decision, come the referendum”, but advocates for “a vision for the future as a nation that values equity, fairness and the rights of the traditional custodians of our land”.

A long list of prominent Australian sportspeople are fronting the campaign, including Meninga, cricketer Alyssa Healy, boxer Jamie Bittman, footballer Jade North, AFL star Eddie Betts, cricketer Jason Gillespie, netballer Cath Cox, basketballer Andrew Gaze, and multiple Olympians, such as baseballer David Hynes and taekwondo competitor Carmen Marton.

The 21-organisation teamup adds further strength to Australian sport’s support for the Indigenous voice, knitting together rival codes that have previously expressed their individual position on the matter.

News Corp journalist Jamie Pandaram, who attended the announcement held at North Sydney Oval, described the scene as “history”.

“This is an unprecedented coming together of major Australian sporting bodies to support the Indigenous Voice to parliament,” he posted on Twitter.

Cricket Australia was the most recent major sport to announce its support, with chairman Mike Baird issuing a statement on Monday afternoon.

“The Cricket Australia board is proud of cricket’s powerful and unique history with First Nations people, and in keeping with our continuing contribution to reconciliation, supports the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian constitution through the voice,” Mr Baird said.

“We encourage respectful and inclusive conversations across cricket to support our staff, players, volunteers and officials’ ongoing journey of education on First Nations histories and cultures and the proposal to formalise a lasting and appropriate voice for First Nations people through the referendum.”

The AFL and Rugby Australia made their position clear a week ago, with the AFL saying it was “privileged to have a long history of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership”.

“Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander players have long made a stellar contribution on the footy field. Their off-field contributions are equally valued for the impact they have made on our game and our community,” it said.

“While we encourage everyone to seek the information they need to form their own views on the referendum, the AFL proudly supports the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian constitution.”

Rugby Australia stressed that the voice “is not about division, it’s about union”.

“If we’re ever going to achieve true union as a nation, we must take every opportunity we have to close the gap which still separates so many of us,” it said.

“Provision for an Indigenous voice to parliament in our constitution is long overdue. Let’s get it over the line.”

And earlier this month, the NRL released a statement saying “true change comes through listening, learning and taking action”, and encouraging “everyone in the rugby league community” to “get informed by the facts and use their voice so that we can move forward together”.

“First Nations communities have deep bonds with rugby league and are part of our fabric at all levels, from grassroots participants and fans to the Indigenous stars who light up the NRL and NRLW,” the league said.

https://www.news.com.au/sport/australias-sport-codes-unite-in-support-of-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c95011ad29c44681a0363da339be8a0e

https://www.foxsports.com.au/more-sports/voice-to-parliament-sports-combine-to-support-indigenous-voice-nrl-afl-news-latest/news-story/fef12bf68846bea61b5017d4d33c17b4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18906031

File: ca1946fd382ed4b⋯.jpg (109.21 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Australian_Federal_Police_….jpg)

File: 6156133568942ed⋯.jpg (72.19 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_announces_h….jpg)

>>18708667

Case against Bruce Lehrmann ‘very weak’: AFP Commander Michael Chew at Sofronoff inquiry

REMY VARGA - MAY 26, 2023

1/2

A high-ranking federal police officer says he believed the case against Bruce Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins was “very weak”, but he directed officers to push ahead because he was concerned that the media was compromising the former staffer’s right to a fair trial.

The 12th day of the Sofronoff inquiry, probing the prosecution of Mr Lehrmann, also heard that ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold SC told The Project co-host Lisa Wilkinson that he “was not a speechwriter” ahead of the 2022 Logies ceremony.

AFP Commander Michael Chew, deputy chief of ACT Police between August 2018 and 2021, said he had had almost daily conversations with detective Superintendent Scott Moller about the strength and weakness of the evidence against Mr Lehrmann.

Commander Chew said he couldn’t recall telling Mr Moller that if it were his choice he would not proceed to prosecute Mr Lehrmann, but he accepted he may have said “there was too much political interference” in the case. “I can’t recall the exact words, but I accept that’s what Superintendent Scott Moller recorded,” he said.

Commander Chew said he did not have a file note of the meeting and said it was possible he had said those words to Mr Moller after being briefed extensively throughout the investigation and forming the view that the case against Mr Lehrmann was “very weak”.

“My personal opinion was there may be insufficient evidence or a very weak case to go forward with the prosecution,” he said.

Commander Chew said the brief of evidence did meet the threshold required by the Magistrates Act because the case had an alleged victim, an alleged offender and limited corroboration.

“The potential for a successful prosecution was there,” he said. “Did I think it was a strong case? Probably not.”

Commander Chew said the political interference he referred to was the intense media interest in the case; the fact the alleged rape was said to have taken place in Parliament House; the involvement of senators Linda Reynolds and Michaelia Cash as witnesses; and the MeToo movement.

“I had no direct or indirect ­interference from any external or internal sources,” he said.

When Mark Tedeschi KC, who is representing Mr Drumgold SC, asked Commander Chew whether his choice to use the words “political interference” was unfortunate, he replied: “On reflection, yes they were.”

“They [words] could be misconstrued, but as well political interference doesn’t always necessarily refer to politics,” he said.

“The same as political correctness doesn’t specifically refer to politics, so it was an expression of the environment for myself.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18906033

File: fa92cf176c085b1⋯.jpg (143.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,AFP_acting_assistant_commi….jpg)

File: 47f36c6ff43d2cf⋯.jpg (163.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_centre.jpg)

>>18906031

2/2

Mr Chew said he directed investigators to serve the brief of evidence on Mr Lehrmann without an adjudication review of that brief, because he felt the matter had dragged on long enough and he was concerned the former ministerial staffer’s right to a fair trial was being compromised by media commentary. “We had the intense media scrutiny and environment that was occurring at the time,” he said.

“The brief of evidence had been compiled throughout the investigation and the fact that we were operating in a Covid-restricted ­environment, which made a few normal practices quite challenging in relation to serving summons ­adjudicating the brief.

“And additionally, due to the commentary that was being held, the possibility of a fair trial for the alleged offender, with all the media commentary and the commentary surrounding it, would be challenging.”

Ms Higgins alleged Mr Lehrmann raped her on the couch in the ministerial office of their then boss Senator Reynolds in the early hours of March 23, 2019, after a night out drinking with ­colleagues.

Ms Higgins made allegations of rape in interviews published on news.com.au and Network Ten’s The Project on February 15, 2021, before asking the AFP to reopen the case and recording a formal ­interview on February 24.

Earlier on Friday, Network Ten senior counsel Tasha Smithies told the inquiry she attended a video meeting with The Project co-host Lisa Wilkinson and Shane Drumgold ahead of the Logies awards ceremony in 2022.

Ms Smithies said she recalled Mr Drumgold cutting off Ms Wilkinson as she read her draft ­acceptance speech and telling the high-profile television presenter he couldn’t give her advice.

“I recall Mr Drumgold cutting her off and saying words to the ­effect that he was not a speech- writer and couldn’t give her any advice on the speech,” she said.

Wilkinson‘s lawyer Sue Chrysanthou SC said her client recalled telling Mr Drumgold she was not seeking his guidance as a speech writer but as a prosecutor, to ­ensure “nothing I say will in any way cause a problem with the ­upcoming trial”.

Ms Smithies said she did not ­recall Ms Wilkinson making those comments, but said it was possible she had.

Wilkinson gave a Logies ceremony speech on June 19, prompting Mr Lehrmann‘s lawyers to successfully make a stay application to vacate the trial’s original starting date.

The inquiry will continue next week.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bruce-lehrmann-rape-trial-attracted-conspiratorial-ideas-sofronoff-inquiry-told/news-story/adb78eb96eaadd2cb89617a10b96601a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18906057

File: d5dcd3f0d1f0871⋯.jpg (656.3 KB,3284x2189,3284:2189,ACT_Policing_Commander_Mic….jpg)

File: bd22fda483dab78⋯.jpg (3.33 MB,6268x4179,6268:4179,Former_Liberal_Party_staff….jpg)

>>18708667

>>18906031

Media pressure behind timing of Lehrmann charge: police commander

Angus Thompson - May 26, 2023

An ACT deputy chief police officer who oversaw the Lehrmann rape investigation said the intense media pressure hanging over the police motivated him to direct the former Coalition staffer be charged in late 2021.

Commander Michael Chew told his subordinate Detective Superintendent Scott Moller in early August “let’s just get it served and move on” against the backdrop of increasing public scrutiny and perceived delays in the investigation.

“The matter was dragging on and the commentary surrounding the matter was increasing,” Chew told an inquiry into authorities’ handling of the high-profile case.

Asked by Erin Longbottom KC, counsel assisting the inquiry, whether those factors had motivated him to direct the court summons be served on Bruce Lehrmann, Chew replied that they had, before acknowledging “in hindsight” he should not have responded that way.

Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to raping Higgins in the parliamentary office of their then-boss, Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, on March 23, 2019, and has always maintained his innocence. The trial was aborted on October 27 due to juror misconduct and there have been no findings against Lehrmann.

The inquiry heard Higgins’ boyfriend David Sharaz had phoned Moller regarding a public conflict between Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw and ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold SC about the progress of the case.

Asked whether he was concerned police would be subject to further criticism due to delays, Chew replied: “Yes”.

Senior Constable Emma Frizzell, who investigated the case, said in a written statement to the public inquiry that Higgins and Sharaz used the media as a tool, and Higgins wanted to see how the story of her claim “played out” before providing a statement to investigators.

Frizzell said that during a rest break in Higgins’ first recorded interview in March 2021, Sharaz “entered the room and without concern for Ms Higgins’ welfare, commenced showing and discussing media coverage to Ms Higgins”.

“I believe the level of media involvement did affect the conduct of the investigation of Ms Higgins’ complaint,” Frizzell said.

“I believe it was a tool driven by Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz, which is evident by the first engagement I had with them, whereby Ms Higgins advised she wished to see how the media played out prior to providing a statement.”

Under questioning from Lehrmann’s barrister, Steven Whybrow, during the trial, Higgins said she was speaking to both police and the media to highlight what she believed was a systemic cultural problem.

“I wanted to reform this issue,” Higgins said at the time. “I stand by my choice and I’m not ashamed of that.”

Frizzell said Higgins told her that news.com.au journalist Samantha Maiden was relaying to her what she had uncovered before reporting on it in the media.

“Ms Higgins added at times Ms Maiden’s comments influenced her memories and questioned if her memory is a result of being told information,” the officer’s statement says.

Frizzell said the media interest affected the evidence witnesses provided, with one witness unwilling to offer some evidence in a recorded statement, while another person refused to give evidence because it could affect his future.

After ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, SC, announced he was discontinuing the case against Lehrmann on December 2, the ACT government launched a review into the handling of the case, which was partly spurred by a public breakdown in the relationship between the police and the DPP.

Australian Federal Police acting assistant commissioner Joanne Cameron, who was deputy chief police officer in the territory at the time of the trial, told the inquiry on Thursday she feared investigators speaking with Lehrmann’s lawyers during the trial would fuel rumours of police conspiring with defence.

“I held the concern that, at the very least, whenever these sorts of interactions were occurring, if they became known to others, there would be judgments made, not even knowing what the conversations were about … others would make a judgment unfairly against my officers,” Cameron said.

In her written statement, Cameron said the constant media attention generated a “trust no one mentality”.

She said that in April 2022, after Drumgold warned the police that the ABC would publish a story about the wrongful service of Higgins’ counselling notes on Lehrmann’s original defence team, her subordinate, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, told her it was “clear” that Drumgold had told the journalist.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/higgins-sharaz-used-media-as-tool-investigator-20230525-p5dbey.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18906146

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18900821

China hits back over Five Eyes blame for US infrastructure cyber attack

Toby Mann - 26 May 2023

China has hit back after Australia and other Five Eyes cyber agencies blamed it for recent cyber attacks targeting "critical infrastructure" in the United States.

"Obviously, this is a collective disinformation campaign by the United States to mobilise the Five Eyes countries for geopolitical purposes," China's foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said.

She was responding to a joint Cybersecurity Advisory issued by US, Australian, New Zealand, Canada and United Kingdom intelligence agencies after detecting a "cluster of activity of interest" linked to China's state-sponsored hacking group Volt Typhoon.

The attacks, the Five Eyes advisory said, targeted "critical infrastructure" in the US.

"It is a report that has … a serious lack of evidence and is extremely unprofessional," Ms Mao said. "As we all know, the Five Eyes is the world's largest intelligence organisation and the NSA is the world's largest hacker organisation, and it is ironic that they have joined forces to issue disinformation reports."

Volt Typhoon used a "living off the land" attack, which exploits legitimate tools within a system, rather than malware. Using that technique hackers were able to evade detection by "blending in with normal Windows system and network activities".

Microsoft said Volt Typhoon's activity had used compromised credentials to access critical infrastructure organisations, and that the group's typical aim was espionage and information gathering.

"Microsoft assesses with moderate confidence that this Volt Typhoon campaign is pursuing development of capabilities that could disrupt critical communications infrastructure between the United States and Asia region during future crises," the company said.

Ms Mao said the "involvement of certain companies in this shows that the US is expanding new channels for spreading disinformation".

"But no matter how the tactics change, it does not change the fact that the US is the empire of hacking," she said.

Last September, China accused the NSA of being behind a cyber attack on China's Northwestern Polytechnic University. "The US side should immediately give an account of the cyber attack instead of spreading false information to divert attention," Ms Mao said.

Security analysts expect Chinese hackers could target US military networks and other critical infrastructure if China invades Taiwan.

The NSA and other Western cyber agencies urged companies that operate critical infrastructure to identify malicious activity using the technical guidance they issued.

"It is vital that operators of critical national infrastructure take action to prevent attackers hiding on their systems," Paul Chichester, director at the UK's National Cyber Security Centre said in a joint statement with the NSA.

Microsoft said the Chinese hacking group has been active since at least 2021 and has targeted several industries including communications, manufacturing, utility, transportation, construction, maritime, government, information technology, and education.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-25/china-hits-back-over-us-infrastructure-cyber-attack-five-eyes/102394724

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh2poNAywos

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18906203

File: 41fc7331b4b6efc⋯.mp4 (15.95 MB,640x360,16:9,Victorian_paedophile_avoid….mp4)

Pain lingers for victims of Puffing Billy child abuser

Erin Pearson - May 26, 2023

1/2

Twelve-year-old Sam* stood watching level crossing railway works on a busy Camberwell road the day he first met by chance the man who would become his abuser.

Child sex offender Anthony John Hutchins, then aged 33, struck up a conversation with the boy and discovered they both loved railways, asking the child if he wanted to join him as a volunteer at tourist attraction Puffing Billy in 1975.

“I used to live near the railway line and hang around to see the station person and signal box regularly. I’d been in a locomotive with a person and nothing had ever happened. Even by 12, I had built up years of trust,” Sam told The Age.

“When Tony approached me and said he was the leader of the track maintenance gang at Puffing Billy I was in awe, I thought it was fantastic.”

Within weeks, Hutchins began collecting the child and driving him to and from the Belgrave railway, before repeatedly sexually abusing the boy in an engine shed, his car and even the child’s own home over the following four years.

On Friday, an 81-year-old Hutchins appeared in the County Court of Victoria after pleading guilty to sexual offending against two boys.

There, in a victim impact statement, the boy from the Camberwell rail works revealed the distressing impact Hutchins’ crimes still had on him more than 40 years later.

He described himself as the child who never spoke and instead suffered in silence for decades.

“Looking back I feel cheapened by the memories I now realise was in effect grooming. The vulnerability I had as a child, the common interest I had in trains … made me an easy target,” he wrote.

“In a very short period I went from head altar boy at primary school … to drinking at 14; expelled and self-harmed at 15.

“What I thought I’d suppressed, I never really did. Emotional wounds … have never healed.”

Hutchins worked for the Department of Defence for 25 years while volunteering at Puffing Billy Railway, where he oversaw track maintenance from 1961 to 1987.

As part of this role, the court heard he would supervise children who volunteered to work on the Puffing Billy network. He was also president of the Victorian Model Railway Society, a group of model train enthusiasts.

He was jailed in the late ’80s for four years over 66 charges of sexual abuse involving six other boys, aged 13 to 17.

Hutchins was charged again after Sam and another man recently came forward to detail the abuse they suffered during the 1970s.

“During this time you introduced him to Victoria’s model railway society, routinely taking him to meetings … and on train spotting trips … instigated by you. In a group setting … you’d always make sure you were the last two to leave,” Judge Trevor Wraight said.

“You only ceased when … a friend of his was in attendance and stood up to you.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18906212

File: ade40de7a5629c1⋯.jpg (856.45 KB,2362x1746,1181:873,Convicted_sex_offenders_Ro….jpg)

File: bed2a56ed46e9a3⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,3410x2273,3410:2273,81_year_old_Anthony_Hutchi….jpg)

File: 6adbd9ee673adf2⋯.jpg (2.18 MB,3713x2475,3713:2475,Hutchins_received_a_wholly….jpg)

>>18906203

2/2

The court heard the second of the two boys was also 12 when he was abused after first coming into contact with Hutchins when he began volunteering at Puffing Billy on the weekends on the advice of his year 6 teacher.

Hutchins soon learned the child had been secretly sleeping aboard a metropolitan train he caught to Belgrave on the weekends, so he could arrive at Puffing Billy on time. Hutchins offered the child the keys to a sleeping carriage at a nearby railway station on Saturday nights where he was later abused.

At one point the court heard the child ran to the Emerald police station to escape his attacker but was unable to raise any officers at night. The child later told police he began sleeping with knives to protect himself.

“If you tell anyone about this, no one is going to believe you,” Hutchins told the child.

The victim later reported the offending to police in 2021 after reading a news article in The Age which discussed “Puffing Billy paedophiles”.

Hutchins pleaded guilty to seven counts of indecent assault on the two boys.

Wraight said the harm he caused to the children could not be overstated.

“What is plain … is that offending of this nature not only devastates the primary victim but it significantly impacts a wide range of family members … changing their relationships indefinitely,” he said.

The judge accepted that an assessment of Hutchins had found he does not meet the criteria for paedophilic disorder.

Now aged 81 and morbidly obese, Hutchins lives with a significant list of medical ailments including cardiac and kidney disease, chronic renal disease, arthritis, leg ulcers and requires a permanent catheter.

Wraight sentenced Hutchins to two years and nine months jail, wholly suspended for three years.

Outside court, Sam said he initially took comfort in the fact Hutchins was jailed in the late 80s for crimes against other boys. But when he became a father himself, he finally found his voice and decided it was time to speak to the police.

He said he hoped his story would help empower other victims to contact police.

“I’ve been asked if I wanted Tony to get a longer sentence, but it’s not about that. The sentence doesn’t matter,” Sam said.

“I hope telling my story makes it easier for the next person. There are other people out there.”

Support is available from Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636 or Lifeline on 13 11 14.

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/pain-lingers-for-victims-of-puffing-billy-child-abuser-20230526-p5dbgt.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18911259

File: 051e12b4c8812dc⋯.jpg (93.78 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_says_conceded….jpg)

>>18676743

Peter Dutton says reconciliation ‘may be set back’ if referendum fails

ROSIE LEWIS and DENNIS SHANAHAN - MAY 27, 2023

1/2

Peter Dutton has conceded ­reconciliation may be set back if the referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government fails, but declares it will be the fault of Anthony Albanese who has “starved” Australians of detail.

As the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader set out political battlelines for the Yes and No campaigns in speeches to parliament, Mr Dutton told The Weekend Australian he didn’t believe the country was ready for the voice and voters weren’t “going to be strongarmed into a position”.

“The first outcome (of a failed referendum) is that our country has been saved from a significant disruption to our form of government and our democracy,” he said.

“But I do believe that the Prime Minister will have a lot of questions to answer because he’s made a deliberate decision to starve the detail from the Australian people.”

In an interview to mark his first 12 months as Liberal leader, Mr Dutton revealed the Coalition had costed about 15 policies and would decide which ones to take to the next election and which ones were unaffordable or would “fall away”.

Vowing not to lead a small-target opposition, Mr Dutton said the Coalition would not be “over the top or brazen or extravagant” and would focus on policy alternatives across energy, taxation, welfare reform, the environment, resources and industrial relations.

Mr Dutton rejected the Prime Minister’s warning that a failed referendum would damage relations with regional partners and said Australians would not be seen as racist. But he acknowledged there would be consequences. “Does it set back reconciliation? I think there is a chance that it sets back reconciliation because there are a lot of people who have had their hopes built up by the Prime Minister,” he said. “And I know that there are a lot of Indigenous leaders who believe that the Prime Minister, when he says that this is not his baby, he’s just carrying it for others, that he’s not giving it his all.

“There is significant legal doubt about the wording that’s been put forward. The government itself believes the wording is too broad but instead has taken a decision to take the legal advice from the referendum working group over the solicitor-general and that will worry Australians. But they’re the decisions the Prime Minister is making right now and he’ll have to face up to the consequences if it fails.”

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has warned “reconciliation will die” if a No vote prevails.

Mr Albanese this week quoted solicitor-general Stephen Donaghue’s opinion – in which he said the government’s proposed constitutional amendment was “not just compatible with the system of representative and responsible government prescribed by the Constitution, but an enhancement of that system” – as proof it was legally sound and should be put to the people.

He gave no ground on calls from some within the Liberal Party to minimise the constitutional risk through alternative forms of words, such as by removing “executive government”, replacing the term with “ministers of state” or clarifying further that it would be up to parliament to decide what obligations the executive government has to consider and respond to the voice’s representations.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18911261

File: 6d9f2547d5122ec⋯.jpg (90.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Dutton_says_the_PM_made….jpg)

>>18911259

2/2

Both Mr Albanese and Mr Dutton have sought to blame each other for a No result, with the Prime Minister accusing the ­Liberal leader of waging a scare campaign in order to divide the country and cast doubt over the voice. Mr Dutton said the government was launching personal attacks rather than attacking the “indisputable” substance of what he was saying, after the Prime Minister on Thursday said the Opposition Leader’s second reading speech on the referendum was “simply unworthy of the alternative prime minister of this nation”.

“It’s a matter of fact that the six-months design process of the voice doesn’t start until after the vote has taken place,” Mr Dutton said.

“It’s a matter of fact that there is strong bipartisan support for constitutional recognition and to legislate a local and regional voice, as recommended by (Tom) Calma and (Marcia) Langton, in legislation but not in the Constitution.

“The pathway is there for the Prime Minister to unite the country and for us to come together but the Prime Minister, when he won office, made a deliberate decision that he was going to use this as a wedge issue. That’s the decision he’s made. And it’s a cross that he’ll have to bear when the Australian public vote No to the voice.

“The Prime Minister is looking for his Redfern moment, but instead he’s dividing a country that has in its heart a goodwill and, from all of us, a burning desire to see the lives of Indigenous Australians improve.”

The Calma-Langton co-design report, from July 2021, recommended pursuing local and regional voices and a national voice, while acknowledging there was “strong support” for enshrining a voice in the Constitution.

Mr Dutton pointed out the voice referendum, due between October and December, would mark the halfway point of the parliamentary term. Policy announcements, he said, would be delivered in the second half of the term as the election neared.

The Opposition Leader, who is in effect the leading No campaigner, said his reasons to vote down the referendum would feature prominently in conversations with Australians as he travelled around the country this year, but they were rightly asking why every moment was not being spent talking about cost-of-living pressures”

With the government portraying Mr Dutton as an angry man leading a so-called Noalition, the Liberal leader said he would continue to call out “mischaracterisations and lies”.

“I find as I go around the country and I meet people, the most common refrain is ‘you’re nothing like what we thought you were or who we see on TV’,” he said.

“And we’ve supported 70 bills that the government has put forward in 12 months.

“Far from being a ‘no opposition’, we’ve engaged constructively and I’ve deliberately done that so that we can we can concentrate our efforts on the real points of difference. We’re not opposing for opposing’s sake.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/peter-dutton-says-reconciliation-may-be-set-back-if-referendum-fails/news-story/0329c5e311f3cd787e9e3fa7e745fb2d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18911295

File: 53c1436d4c26cbf⋯.jpg (348.57 KB,2040x1338,340:223,Minister_for_Indigenous_af….jpg)

File: d6a35b19cbb0c43⋯.jpg (309.13 KB,2040x1360,3:2,On_the_sixth_anniversary_o….jpg)

File: b389c1e3d4c75e2⋯.jpg (435.91 KB,1760x1174,880:587,Mutitjulu_women_dancing_a_….jpg)

>>18676743

>>18911259

Linda Burney hits back at Dutton’s claim Labor risking reconciliation with Indigenous voice referendum

Minister for Indigenous Australians says referendum ‘will be determined by the Australian people, not politicians’

Lorena Allam - 27 May 2023

The minister for Indigenous Australians, Linda Burney, has hit back at comments from Peter Dutton and accused the opposition leader of “playing politics” with the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum and dividing Australians.

Dutton said on Saturday the cause of reconciliation could be set back if the referendum on an Indigenous voice failed but accused the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, of starving Australians of detail.

Dutton told the Australian newspaper a “no” vote would be better for the nation.

“The first outcome [of a failed referendum] is that our country has been saved from a significant disruption to our form of government and our democracy,” Dutton said.

“Does it set back reconciliation? I think there is a chance that it sets back reconciliation because there are a lot of people who have had their hopes built up by the prime minister.

“He’ll have to face up to the consequences if it fails.”

Standing at Uluru, flanked by members of the government’s referendum engagement group, on the anniversary of the 1967 referendum, Burney accused Dutton of being divisive with the issue.

“This referendum will be determined by the Australian people, not politicians, and I have great faith in the Australian people,” Burney said.

“Next week, in the House of Representatives, there will be a vote on the constitutional alteration bill to allow us to have the referendum later this year. And if Peter Dutton was fair dinkum about supporting reconciliation, if he was fair dinkum about uniting and not dividing, then Mr Dutton would vote in favour of the bill next week.

“And Mr Dutton would vote yes, in the referendum later this year. This is not something that is not negotiable.”

Burney was speaking at Uluru on the anniversary of the 1967 referendum, which marks the start of National Reconciliation Week.

Alongside her were many members of the working group on enshrining an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice to parliament in the constitution. Mamu man from Innisfail Nathan Appo said it was time for younger generations to take the load from elders who had done the “heavy lifting”.

“Linda and my other elders behind me, they’ve done a lot of heavy lifting,” he said.

“At the 1967 referendum, [elders] got us over the line, they did all the fighting, and as a young person I say our time, it’s our time, to come together, gather our allies and show some support.

“Have conversations at home, have conversations in your workplace, your sporting groups. It’s up to the Australian community to get this over the line. Our community had been doing all the heavy lifting for years.

“We’re on the cusp of creating history for our people.

“And I can’t understand how people can’t be emotionally driven to be a part of it. So my message to our young people out there, this is our time to step up. It’s our time to show true reconciliation, and be on board with the vote. Because it’s going to change lives. It’s going to empower our people for change in the future.”

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/27/linda-burney-hits-back-at-duttons-claims-labor-risking-reconciliation-with-indigenous-voice-referendum

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18915092

File: ff199f98164e206⋯.jpg (102.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Business_veteran_Michael_C….jpg)

>>18676743

Wesfarmers boss Michael Chaney says foreign investors will question if Australia’s a ‘fair place’ if voice referendum fails

ROSIE LEWIS and ELI GREENBLAT - MAY 28, 2023

1/2

Wesfarmers chairman Michael Chaney, a prominent supporter of the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, has warned international investors are watching the referendum closely and will question if Australia is a “fair place” if it fails.

Mr Chaney said opposing the referendum would betray Wesfarmers’ Indigenous employees, customers and suppliers, as well as the Australian people. The business veteran, who has also led the boards of NAB and Woodside Energy, said chief executives of other big companies universally shared the same view.

The intervention, which sparked a backlash from No campaigners and drew scepticism from other business leaders, comes as the government’s Constitution Alteration Bill outlining the referendum question and voice model Australians will vote on is set to pass the House of Representatives this week.

It will be debated and voted on in the Senate next month, with increasing expectations the referendum will be held in October.

“There’s a very important role for corporates here,” Mr Chaney told the Future Generation 2fold podcast.

“We employ 100,000 people of whom 4000 approximately are Indigenous people. We have suppliers who are Indigenous suppliers. Many of our customers are Indigenous people, whether it’s in Bunnings or Kmart and Target and so on. We have international shareholders who are looking with great interest at this referendum and frankly I think would throw their hands up if it were lost and wonder about Australia as a fair place.

“If you think of all of those things, not supporting this referendum would be betrayal of all of those people I’ve mentioned … and I think betrayal of the Australian people because we think this is a very important move, a uniting move in Australia and it should be supported.”

The warning was immediately knocked down by the No camp and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry described it as “overreach”, but Indigenous leader Marcia Langton said some offshore investors were very concerned as they followed the referendum debate.

“They were engaged after the Juukan Gorge disaster and are also watching policy and legal developments to ensure that they are not investing in projects that are based on denying our rights,” Professor Langton, a member of the government’s referendum working group, told The Australian.

“The referendum outcome will send a clear signal about the kind of country Australia is and reputational issues for big investors concerned about their social impacts.”

ACCI chief executive Andrew McKellar said the organisation, said to be the country’s largest and most representative business network, had decided the voice referendum was not fundamentally a business issue and won’t advocate either a Yes or No vote.

He cautioned against drawing links between what happened in a democratic process and what international investors thought.

“At the end of the day they don’t get a vote, they get a vote on where their money goes. People invest in all sorts of countries with all sorts of standards of governance and human rights. It’s an overreach,” Mr McKellar said.

“If you agree with it (the referendum), great, if you don’t agree with it, same deal. To try and co-opt something like international image or international investor appetite to something that is fundamentally an issue for Australian voters to determine in their own good conscience, I’d be really careful about trying to use that as a political persuasion.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18915093

File: 06c46e70c1f6177⋯.jpg (1.4 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>18915092

2/2

Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox, who also chairs the Global Business Coalition, which lobbies G20 nations on behalf of industry, said the voice had not been raised at any international business forums or discussions in recent months.

“The focus of talks, rather, has been on inflation, trade facilitation, energy costs, digitalisation and skills shortages,” Mr Willox said.

“There may be some interest in the vote later in the year but there is a longstanding tendency to overthink how the rest of the world is looking on at internal issues.”

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney was approached for comment but had not responded by deadline.

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said a No vote would indicate to foreign investors that Australia was an ideal place to invest in.

“Our nation has been built on free market values and a Yes vote threatens those values. Smart people learn from global history and racial division has only ever lead to destructive and crippling outcomes,” she said.

“If Australia votes No we maintain sovereignty, we demonstrate that we believe in equality and the rule of law.”

Indigenous leader Nyunggai Warren Mundine, who like Senator Nampijinpa Price is a leading No campaigner, said Mr Chaney’s comments were “insane” and “absolute nonsense”, as overseas companies were lining up to invest in Australian businesses, goods and resources.

Mr Mundine acknowledged there were racists in Australia but said compared to any other country “we come out like a shining light”.

“The evidence is millions of people are trying to get into this country. Australia is one of the fairest countries in the world, one of the strongest liberal democracies in the world,” he said.

“People are risking their lives to get into Australia. You don’t see people getting on boats and leaving. We’re the most liberal, the most equal country in the world and for people to make even a comment about that, they don’t have a clue what they’re talking about.”

Mr Chaney, who was the boss of Wesfarmers for 13 years before retiring from the position in 2005 to later become its chairman in 2015, said he didn’t think his position would be seen as “elitist interference”.

While it was up to individual Australians to vote as they please, Mr Chaney believed the voice was something he thought all Australians, organisations and companies should get behind.

He added that “absolutely” the voice should include the ability to make representations to the executive government, which has been the most divisive element of the government’s voice model.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/wesfarmers-boss-michael-chaney-says-foreign-investors-will-question-if-australias-a-fair-place-if-voice-referendum-fails/news-story/33c58974ea87d8eb3fe296e9e3358706

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919530

Notables

are not endorsements

#29 - Part 1

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>18670782 NATO calls Albanese to Lithuania summit - Anthony Albanese has been invited to attend NATO’s upcoming summit in Lithuania amid fears over China’s growing alignment with Russia and the authoritarian powers’ systemic threat to the international order.

>>18670815 US government facing compensation claim over Navy officer’s $150 sex with Melbourne teen - A former Melbourne sex worker has launched legal action against the US government over allegations a senior officer in the US Navy had sex with her in the 1990s - when she was just 15 and addicted to heroin. Lisa Harris, 39, will pursue compensation under an agreement between the US and Australia, which provides recourse for local victims of alleged misconduct by American military personnel.

>>18676786 Latitude refuses to pay hackers’ ransom demand - Consumer lender Latitude Financial Group has refused to pay a ransom demand from hackers who stole the details of 14 million consumers last month, but would not say if the criminals have threatened to release the data, which includes driver’s licence details.

>>18676802 Hiding in the Russian consulate for months, ‘Aussie Cossack’ demands a prisoner swap - “The Aussie Cossack”, Simeon Boikov, was on parole for breaching a suppression order when he was told by police he was wanted after the alleged assault of a pro-Ukrainian protester. Rather than face arrest on the eve of a planned trip to Moscow in December, he drove straight to the Russian consulate. The Herald understands diplomatic discussions are under way about how to get Boikov out of Australia.

>>18676820 Video: ‘Our soldiers’ new crush’: Ukraine enlists AC/DC in plea for Australian Hawkei military vehicles - The Ukrainian government has taken to social media to plead with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to donate protected mobility vehicles to help beat back invading Russian forces, describing the Australian-made four-wheel drives as its new military “crush”. In a Twitter message, Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence said: “Our soldiers absolutely love Australian Bushmasters. But now they have a new crush: the Hawkei. These two would be a perfect match on the battlefield. We would truly appreciate their reunion in Ukraine, @AlboMP!” The post was accompanied by a minute-long video, set to a soundtrack of AC/DC’s Back in Black, showing Hawkeis in action and describing them as a “perfect reconnaissance vehicle”.

>>18676841 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post: Leaders of Marine Rotational Force Darwin meet with Ambassador Caroline Kennedy at the U.S. Embassy Australia. The annual rotation of Marines underpins the illustrious history shared between the United States and Australia. #AlliesandPartners #marines

>>18682169 Quarter of Tasmania’s population hacked by Russians, says Premier Jeremy Rockliff - Up to a quarter of Tasmanians may have had personal data stolen by Russian-linked hackers, the Premier has suggested. Jeremy Rockliff on Tuesday said the scale of the hack of Education Department data handled by third-party transfer system GoAnywhere MFT had emerged after a “very complex analysis”.

>>18682176 Crikey alleges Lachlan Murdoch morally culpable for Capitol riots - Online news outlet Crikey has alleged Lachlan Murdoch was “morally and ethically” culpable for the deadly 2021 US Capitol riots in its amended defence to the defamation suit filed by the elder son of Rupert Murdoch, in an escalation of the dispute between the parties. Murdoch junior, chief executive of Fox Corporation and co-chairman of News Corp, filed Federal Court defamation proceedings in August against Crikey over a June 29, 2022 article naming his family as “unindicted co-conspirators” of Donald Trump following the US Capitol riots in 2021.

>>18687374 Peter Dutton clashes with reporter after grim Alice Springs warning - Liberal leader Peter Dutton has warned “somebody is going to get killed” in Alice Springs and unleashed on an ABC reporter during a shocking account of the violence and sexual abuse in the town.

>>18687384 Pressure on Anthony Albanese to attend NATO summit - Anthony Albanese is under pressure to attend the upcoming NATO summit in Lithuania amid signs of European reluctance to take a firm stand against China’s growing assertiveness and disregard for international norms.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919533

#29 - Part 2

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>18687407 Video: ‘The worst of American politics’: Premier backs drag performers after cafe threats - Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews says the targeting of drag events is the worst of American politics creeping into the state after a Melbourne cafe cancelled a children’s craft and games event hosted by drag queens.

>>18693432 ‘Heads in sand’: Labor lashed over NT child sex abuse claims - The Coalition has dug in behind Peter Dutton’s assertion of widespread child sexual violence in central Australia, with Liberal senator Simon Birmingham and opposition deputy leader Sussan Ley calling on the federal government to stop playing politics and take action.

>>18693485 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese named in Time's 100 most influential people list - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been included in Time magazine's list of the 100 most influential people of 2023, alongside King Charles III, Ukraine's First Lady, Olena Zelenska, and model Bella Hadid. Mr Albanese joins former prime ministers Kevin Rudd and John Howard as the only other Australian leaders to have made the list, while Julia Gillard was shortlisted in 2013.

>>18693513 Ringleader of the ‘tinnie terrorists’ Robert Musa Cerantonio to be freed from jail in May - The leader of the so-called “tinnie terrorists”, self-styled preacher Robert Musa Cerantonio, will be back on the streets in May after completing a seven-year jail term for planning to overthrow The Philippines government. He is one of seven high-risk terrorist offenders due for release into the community this year, as the government and police prepare to abandon the continued detention orders that have allowed authorities to jail dangerous ­people beyond the end of their prison terms.

>>18696839 Video: ‘I’d stake my life on it’: Trump has ‘no chance’ of an election win - The recent arrest of Donald Trump “guarantees” the former US president a Republican nomination for president however he has “no chance” of scoring an election win in 2024, says Former Howard government minister Peter McGauran. “He has no chance whatever,” he told Sky News Australia. “I’d stake my life on it.”

>>18698609 Video: Kids return to the streets in Alice Springs to run amok - "The girl looks about 14. “I’m drunk, f_ck you,” she yells as we pass on the street. It’s 11.20pm on Thursday in Alice Springs, and the group of a dozen or so Indigenous children and early teens heads on towards the main drag of town. Most of the kids are around 15, with some closer to 10 or 11. Three months on from our first reports revealing the extent of kids running wild in Alice Springs and it’s clear little has changed. Perhaps nothing." - Liam Mendes - theaustralian.com.au

>>18698622 Linda Burney just metres from fatal stabbing of woman - Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has expressed her heartfelt condolences to the family of a woman who died after being stabbed metres away from the federal cabinet minister in Darwin on Friday. Burney and her staff were in the foyer of the Doubletree Hilton just before 6pm when the woman ran into the hotel bleeding heavily. Police allege she was stabbed directly outside the hotel on the Esplanade. Some of Burney’s staff helped attend to the woman along with hotel staff, while the minister comforted members of the woman’s family. The woman was taken to the Royal Darwin Hospital but died a short time later.

>>18698686 Video: Wild night of violent crime in Darwin: Woman stabbed to death in CBD, man and woman stabbed at city's busiest shopping centre - A woman has died after being stabbed outside a CBD hotel in a wild night of crime in Darwin, while two others were allegedly set upon by knife-wielding attacker at Casuarina Square shopping centre. Sky News has also been sent video footage of a brawl at the shopping centre’s bus exchange earlier the same evening. A group of men can be seen chasing a man who then appears to be hit by a passing bus. The incidents come less than a month after 20-year-old Declan Laverty was stabbed to death while working at a Darwin bottle shop.

>>18698736 Labor under pressure for minimising sexual assault cases - The Fyles Labor government is facing claims it tried to minimise and even deny alarmingly high rates of child sex abuse in the Northern Territory when its Treasurer, Eva Lawler, told a radio station: “Children have been sexually abused in Australia since, bloody, the place was probably settled”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919534

#29 - Part 3

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>18698909 Talisman Sabre 2023: Australian Defence Force leads largest ever military drill - Australia will host one of the largest military drills in the world with more than 30,000 personnel and dozens of ships, aircraft and armoured vehicles mobilising from across the region. Such is the size of the Talisman Sabre 2023 exercise, the “battlefield” has been extended from across the top of Australia to swathes of the Coral Sea down as far south to Jervis Bay in NSW and will even involve Norfolk Island. The biennial two-week exercise has long been one of the largest Australian Defence Force hosted exercises, run largely with the United States military and involving 17,000 troops.

>>18698909 Talisman Sabre - >MAGIC SWORD - https://qanon.pub/?q=Operation%20Specialists - https://qanon.pub/?q=magic

>>18703552 Inside the Firm: How an international drug cartel plotted a ‘line to Australia’ - The inner workings of Swedish kingpin Maximilian Rivkin’s crime empire have leaked onto the internet, revealing a plan to target Australia’s insatiable drug market to make them rich beyond measure. The unprecedented glimpse inside transnational drug crime and the AN0M network comes on the eve of a court case that could decide dozens of AN0M-related prosecutions in NSW.

>>18708643 Video: Lidia Thorpe in clash outside Melbourne strip club - Lidia Thorpe has defended her behaviour outside a Melbourne strip club, after footage surfaced of her yelling profanities and telling men they had small genitalia. The former Greens turned Independent senator Thorpe claimed people were trying to “drag me down,” in a brief statement.

>>18708691 Twitter labels ABC and SBS ‘government-funded media’ - ABC and SBS will not quit Twitter, after the social media platforms labelled the public broadcasters’ news services “government-funded media”, lumping the two into a category previously used for government mouthpieces. Twitter moved on Monday to label ABC News’ account on its platform “government funded media”, in the wake of similar moves in recent weeks that earned the ire of users, leading some media groups to quit the site. SBS, which was also hit with the “government-funded media” label on Monday, told The Australian the broadcaster would push back on the move.

>>18708709 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post - MRF-D Marines and Army soldiers with 103 Battery, 8/12 Regiment, 1st Brigade - Australian Army conduct dry fire drills on the M777A2 lightweight 155mm howitzers at Robertson Barracks, Darwin, Northern Territory, April 6, 2023. Through increased training and exercises, MRF-D and Defence Australia are expanding our range of interoperability, further strengthening the historic Alliance. #MRFD #YourADF #AlliesandPartners #trainhard

>>18714027 Defence blames braking fault in Hawkei armoured vehicles for reluctance to supply Ukraine - Defence is blaming a braking fault affecting the army’s fleet of 1100 Hawkei armoured vehicles for its reluctance to supply war-torn Ukraine with the Australian-made four-wheel drives. The anti-lock braking system fault can undermine the vehicle’s stopping power at high speeds but does not affect its off-road performance. Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said his country hoped to acquire an initial 30-60 Hawkeis to support the country’s coming counteroffensive against Vladimir Putin’s Russian forces.

>>18719453 IBAC finds Victorian government advisors put pressure on public servants to award contract to union - Senior staff in Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews's government interfered and pressured public servants to ensure lucrative contracts were awarded to a key Labor Party ally without competitive tender, the state's anti-corruption watchdog has found. The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) has slammed the premier, health ministers and the public service for the awarding of a contract in 2018 to the Health Workers Union (HWU) to deliver specialist training to deal with occupational violence. "The union was given privileged access and favourable treatment,'' IBAC's Operation Daintree found.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919537

#29 - Part 4

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>18719500 Video: U.S. Marines and Aussies Form an Unbreakable Bond Through Dry-Fire Drills - U.S. Marines with Kilo Battery, 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment (Reinforced), Marine Rotational Force-Darwin, and Australian Army soldiers with 103 Battery, 8/12 Regiment, 1st Brigade, conduct dry fire exercises, with M777A2 lightweight 155mm howitzers, at Robertson Barracks, Northern Territory, Australia, April 6, 2023. Through increased training and exercises, MRF-D and the Australian Defence Force are expanding their range of interoperability, further strengthening the Alliance. (U.S. Marine Corps video by Cpl. Gabriel Antwiler) - Defense Now

>>18719526 U.S. Marines Tweet: Col. Brendan Sullivan, commanding officer of @MRFDarwin, visits the Australian War Memorial alongside @AustralianArmy Maj. Todd O’Callaghan, Directorate of Army Operations, Australian Army Headquarters, April 6. #MRFD23 focuses on regional relationships with #AlliesAndPartners.

>>18723461 Foreign spies are aggressively seeking ‘disloyal’ insiders with access to Australia’s secrets, ASIO warns - Foreign spies are “aggressively seeking secrets across all parts of Australian society”, including trying to recruit “disloyal” government insiders to access classified information, ASIO has warned. The intelligence agency said “hostile foreign powers and their proxies” were seeking to test the Australian government’s security clearance system. In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry, ASIO argued in favour of legal changes to enable the agency to become centrally responsible for issuing the highest level of security clearances in Australia.

>>18723495 Anthony Albanese in ‘racist and misogynistic’ bid to silence me: Lidia Thorpe - Lidia Thorpe says Anthony Albanese’s suggestion she should “get some help” is a “continuation of a racist and misogynistic narrative” used to silence Indigenous people. The independent Indigenous senator also claimed she was “harassed by racists” last Sunday when she was filmed leaving a strip club at 3am, and the media had mischaracterised the incident.

>>18723554 Kevin Rudd downplays backlash over attacks on Donald Trump, meets Joe Biden - Kevin Rudd has brushed aside concerns his past attacks on Donald Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president, will hinder Australia’s relationship with the US or Republicans in a short press conference in Washington DC after presenting his credentials to Joe Biden. Mr Rudd had unleashed on Mr Trump repeatedly in public, calling him a “a traitor to the West”, guilty of “rancid treachery” as recently as February last year. “The bottom line is I’ve been in this town on and off for 30 years, I have bucketloads of Republican friends and bucketloads of Democrat friends, working in foreign policy and national security,” he said.

>>18723554 Kevin Rudd Tweet: Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery.

>>18723554 Q Post #2576 - Those with the most to lose are the loudest. Those who 'knowingly' broke the law in a coordinated effort [treason] are the most vocal. Crimes against Humanity. Q - https://qanon.pub/#2576

>>18723589 Video: Exercise Talisman Sabre: Dates released for Australia’s largest military training activity with US - More than 30,000 military personnel, mostly from the Australian Defence Force and US Armed Forces, are expected to converge on Queensland, parts of northern NSW and Darwin from June to early August for Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 (TS23), a large-scale military training activity that culminates in a mock war between all military branches on land, sea and in the air. The peak of the training, which also incorporates crews in fighter jets and aircraft carrier ships, is scheduled to take place between July 21 and August 4.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919544

#29 - Part 5

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>18729080 Albanese to attend NATO summit - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has agreed to attend the NATO summit in Lithuania in July after coming under criticism when it appeared he would skip the high-powered gathering. Albanese attended last year’s NATO summit at the invitation of host country Spain, but The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age reported he did not intend to attend this year’s summit, in part because of a packed schedule of travel including the coronation of King Charles III in London next month. A spokeswoman for Albanese on Friday confirmed Albanese would attend the summit.

>>18729094 Lachlan Murdoch drops defamation case against Crikey publisher - Fox Corporation chief Lachlan Murdoch has dropped his defamation proceedings against the publisher of online news outlet Crikey and several of its editors and executives. Mr Murdoch sued Private Media in the Federal Court in August over an article published by Crikey, claiming it defamed him in referring to his family as "unindicted co-conspirators" in the US Capitol riots. On Friday his lawyers filed a notice to discontinue the case. It comes days after Fox settled a defamation case in the US brought by Dominion Voting Systems, for $1.17 billion.

>>18734262 Hambali lawyer seeks AFP records for pre-trial hearing at Guantanamo Bay - The Australian Federal Police have stonewalled repeated requests to provide access to their records on the accused Bali bombing mastermind known as Hambali ahead of his first pre-trial hearing next week, his US military lawyer says. Encep “Hambali” Nurjaman, who was once Southeast Asia’s most wanted terrorist, will face a military court in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, next week for just the second time since his arrest in Thailand 20 years ago.

>>18737067 Discovery Of WW2 Shipwreck Ends Australia’s ‘Tragic’ Maritime Chapter - Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Saturday that the wreck of a Japanese merchant ship, sunk in World War Two with 864 Australian soldiers on board, had been found in the South China Sea, ending a tragic chapter of the country’s history. Marles said the SS Montevideo Maru, an unmarked prisoner of war transport vessel missing since being sunk off the Philippines’ coast in July 1942, had been discovered northwest of Luzon island. The ship was torpedoed en route from what is now Papua New Guinea to China’s Hainan by a U.S. submarine, unaware of the POWs onboard. It is considered Australia’s worst maritime disaster.

>>18744473 Australian ‘energy supply risk’ worries Japan: ambassador Shingo Yamagami - The outgoing and outspoken Japanese ambassador to Australia, Shingo Yamagami, has warned in a departure interview that “sovereign risk” is now an active concern among Japan’s corporates and energy companies which fear the reliability of Australia as an energy supplier.

>>18744677 Video: LIVE: Gallipoli Dawn Service | Anzac Day 2023 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST - ABC Australia

>>18744686 Video: Anzac Day Melbourne Dawn Service 2023 - ShrineMelbourne

>>18744705 Live: Anzac Day 2023 Sydney Dawn Service | April 25, 2023 from 4:25am AEST - 9 News Australia

>>18744714 Video: Anzac Day 2023: Currumbin Dawn Service and special Sunrise coverage - 7NEWS Australia

>>18744726 Video: LIVE: Melbourne March | Anzac Day 2023 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST - ABC Australia

>>18744759 Video: ANZAC Day 2023 - They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old; Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn. At the going down of the sun and in the morning We will remember them. Lest We Forget.''

>>18749439 Powerful images as Aussies commemorate Anzac Day - Thousands of Australians across the country and the world are marking the most solemn day on the nation’s calendar. There were emotional scenes with young and old gathered to pay tribute to fallen servicemen and women.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919562

#29 - Part 6

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>18749463 ‘I was 20 going on 16’: Korean War veterans lead Anzac Day march in sombre reflection - For years, Lloyd Knight had nightmares about his time serving as a fighter pilot in the Korean War. “I was 20 going on 16, so it was pretty traumatic, thinking that you’re killing people,” said Knight, who flew 45 missions in Korea in 1953. On Tuesday, the 90-year-old was among the Korean War veterans leading Melbourne’s 2023 Anzac Day march to mark the 70th anniversary of the war’s armistice. Thousands watched veterans, relatives and community groups march down St Kilda Road from Princes Bridge to the Shrine of Remembrance.

>>18749478 ‘Absolutely disgusted’: Sydney statue defaced in Anzac Day protest - A community in Sydney’s north-west is angry after a statue was defaced with red paint ahead of a local Anzac Day dawn service. The Lachlan Macquarie statue in Windsor’s McQuade Park was doused in red paint and handprints alongside the phrases “here stands a mass murderer who ordered the genocide” and “no pride in genocide”. “We are a military community here in the Hawkesbury and to have this done on a day of such national and local significance to me is appalling,” Mayor Sarah McMahon said. Monument Australia, an organisation that records monuments throughout Australia, states on its website the statue was commissioned during the bicentenary celebrations in 1994 of European settlement in the Hawkesbury. “There is controversy around Macquarie’s treatment of Indigenous people,” the website states. “In April 1816, Macquarie ordered soldiers under his command to kill or capture any Aboriginal people they encountered during a military operation aimed at creating a sense of terror. At least 14 men, women and children were brutally killed, some shot, others driven over a cliff.”

>>18749527 Bali bomb mastermind Hambali appears at Guantanamo hearing - The terrorist mastermind behind the 2002 nightclub Bali bombings, which killed 202 people including 88 Australians, has appeared at a preliminary hearing in Guantanamo Bay where prosecutors proposed a formal trial date of early 2025, more than 21 years after his arrest in Thailand. Encep Nurjaman, 59, an Indonesian who is known as Hambali, sat calmly in a military courtroom in Guantanamo Bay during proceedings that became bogged down in legal debate about translator quality and the US government’s sluggish provision of documents.

>>18754977 Video: ‘Girls won’t go home … they’re worried about their uncles’ An Alice Springs school principal has revealed the horrifying extent of the crisis engulfing Indigenous children in central Australia, detailing incidents where children are sometimes returned to school in handcuffs or wearing ankle bracelets and one in which a 12-year-old and his mates led teachers on a wild pursuit through the town in a stolen minibus. In a dramatic video of the minibus chase obtained by The Australian a teacher can be heard screaming: “You little shits … pull over!” as she leans from the window of a pursuing car.

>>18755136 - Anthony Albanese reacts to Joe Biden's re-election bid ahead of US President travelling to Sydney for Quad meeting - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described Joe Biden as "a friend of Australia" as he was quizzed on news of the United States President's re-election bid. Mr Biden announced on Tuesday he would be seeking another four-year term in 2024 "to stand up for democracy" and because it was "time to finish the job". The 80-year-old will visit Australia next month for the third in-person Quad Leaders' Summit, alongside Mr Albanese and the leaders of Japan and India. Mr Albanese told reporters in Sydney Mr Biden "will be a very welcome visitor" when he makes his first trip Down Under as President. "President Biden I regard as a friend and he's certainly a friend of Australia. I don't comment on the internal politics of the United States," the Prime Minister said. "That's a matter for the people of the United States. But can I say this: President Biden will be a very welcome visitor here in Australia."

>>18760659 Federal MP Marion Scrymgour backs ‘safe school’ for Indigenous children in Alice Springs - Northern Territory federal Labor MP Marion Scrymgour has backed moves by Alice Springs principal Gavin Morris to get Indigenous children off the streets and into the classroom by providing safe accommodation for them at school. Ms Scrymgour will meet Dr Morris as early as Saturday to work through issues needed to fast-track the groundbreaking proposal for a residential facility – part of it secure – for students and says she will push federal Education Minister Jason Clare to consider using funding earmarked for education in Central Australia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919564

#29 - Part 7

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>18760753 ASIO backs federal push to ban Nazi symbolism - Australia's spy agency says a proposed bill outlawing Nazi symbols could help stop extremist radicalisation and recruitment. Federal shadow attorney-general Michaelia Cash introduced the bill last month following a protest in Melbourne which drew neo-Nazis, who used the sieg heil salute. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation says nationalist and racist violent extremists adopt specific imagery and terminology to signal their ideology, build belonging and provoke opponents. ASIO believes extremists are currently more focused on trying to attract new members rather than planning an attack and the legislation would help stop that. "(The bill) would assist law enforcement in early intervention," the agency said in a submission to a parliamentary inquiry.

>>18766061 Heat on ACT DPP Shane Drumgold over Bruce Lehrmann rape trial conduct - Pressure is mounting on ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold over his handling of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial, with the terms of reference of the Sofronoff inquiry widened to include his conduct in the preparation of the proceedings and in the hearings. A key witness in the trial accused Mr Drumgold of threatening and intimidating her as she left the witness box on a morning tea break, and of ignoring her pleas to be recalled to the stand to refute what she alleged was “blatantly false and misleading” evidence by Ms Higgins.

>>18771278 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Tweet: Lest we forget - This week MRF-D Marines and Sailors celebrate Anzac day alongside @DefenceAust - Anzac Day commemorates Australian, New Zealand, and Allied service members for displaying discipline, courage, and self sacrifice in service to their country. #LestWeForget #AnzacDay

>>18771291 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post: LEST WE FORGET - This week, Marines with Marine Rotational Force Darwin alongside Defence Australia Allies, participated in Anzac Day celebrations across the Northern Territory. Anzac Day commemorates current and former Australian, New Zealand, and Allied service members for displaying discipline, courage, and self-sacrifice in service to their country. #lestweforget2023 #anzacday #FreeAndOpenIndoPacific - (U.S. Marine Corps photos by LCpl. Brayden Daniel and Royal Australian Air Force photos by Sgt. Pete Gammie)

>>18775267 Disgraced ex-lord mayor stripped of Order of Australia title - Former Melbourne lord mayor Robert Doyle has had his Order of Australia honour stripped by Governor-General David Hurley. Mr Doyle, who became embroiled in sexual misconduct allegations in late 2017, had his companion of the Order of Australia terminated last month according to a gazette notice published on Friday, 28 April 2023. An independent investigation conducted by Barrister Ian Freckleton reported Mr Doyle touched the breast of councillor Tessa Sullivan in 2017 in the mayoral car. It also upheld a complaint made by another councillor Cathy Oke, who said Mr Doyle inappropriately touched her thigh during a dinner in 2014.

>>18779626 Video: Wild brawl in Alice Springs as Northern Territory police chief Jamie Chalker exits - Shocking scenes of violence have played out on the streets of Alice Springs just as Northern Territory police commissioner Jamie Chalker exits his job, leaving the beleaguered Territory government hunting for a new police chief amid a fresh wave of alcohol-fuelled crime and racial tension. In one incident seen and filmed by The Australian from 2.42am on Saturday, officers were forced to storm a takeaway pizza shop with their Tasers drawn in pursuit of youths who had allegedly armed themselves with a kitchen knife after being ­involved in a wild street brawl with caucasian and Indigenous men. Indigenous senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said the footage was “plain and simple evidence” that the Northern Territory government “has lost complete control of law and order”.

>>18779687 Abbott attacks Voice as Indigenous leader pushes for compromise - Former prime minister Tony Abbott has told a parliamentary inquiry the Voice referendum will leave Australia embittered and divided and should be abandoned, while a key Indigenous leader has urged the government to consider changes to the amendment to shore up support among hesitant voters. A staunch opponent of the Voice, Abbott criticised the degree of public scrutiny given to the proposed Constitutional change as “altogether too abbreviated”, and argued the Voice would divide the country on the basis of ancestry and tie up government decision-making in High Court litigation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919566

#29 - Part 8

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>18779781 Five Eyes: Departing Japanese ambassador flags ambition for nation to join intelligence alliance - Japan is hoping to join the Five Eyes international intelligence alliance as it stands on the front line of strategic challenges facing the region, the country’s top diplomat in Australia has said. Shingo Yamagami is also urging Australia to move urgently on defence, warning of growing security concerns from China in the Indo-Pacific.

>>18779870 Video: Why David Koch wore lipstick live on air on Sunrise - David Koch wore bright red lipstick on Sunrise this morning, all for a good cause. The breakfast TV host, affectionately nicknamed Kochie, rocked the striking colour while interviewing model Jett Kenny, the son of ironman champion Grant Kenny and former Olympian Lisa Curry. When he and his family suffered unimaginable loss three years ago when his sister, Jaimi Kenny, died from mental health issues, Jett vowed to raise awareness and funding for the cause. Now, on May 11, his dream turns to reality as he becomes the inaugural ambassador for the Lip-Stick It campaign, an initiative encouraging Aussie men to wear lipstick on the day to help raise funds for women’s mental health support services.

>>18779932 Video: Sunrise Facebook Post - Kochie joined Jett Kenny in wearing red lipstick as part of a new campaign to raise awareness for women's mental health issues.

>>18779870 Think logically. Ask yourself - is this normal? Conspiracy?

>>18784863 ‘We need help’: Northern Territory community racked by violence as residents claim government has abandoned them - Residents of the remote Northern Territory community of Peppimenarti say they have been forced to flee their homes or endure violence, including stabbings and sexual assaults, amid claims the government has abandoned them. Last week’s planned visit from the NT police minister, Kate Wordern, to discuss the ongoing problems in the community was cancelled when her private plane had to be diverted due to unrest. About 200 people live Peppimenarti, six hours’ drive south of Darwin. Residents are increasingly fearful of violence, and lawyers recently took a claim of racial discrimination to the Australian Human Rights Commission over a lack of police resources in the remote Indigenous community.

>>18784890 Network Ten MasterChef judge Jock Zonfrillo dead at age 46 - Days before his death, Jock Zonfrillo filled his social media accounts with videos sharing his cooking secrets as he prepared pancakes, pasta dishes and homemade pickles. Yet on Monday afternoon his accounts shared news of his shock death to his hundreds of thousands of followers. The Scottish-born chef was found dead at a hotel apartment in Melbourne’s inner north at 2am on Monday after police were called to the Lygon Street, Carlton, address for a welfare check. His death is not being treated as suspicious. Zonfrillo had previously spoken of his battle with drugs, including being a heroin addict at as a teenager. “We were smoking pot behind the bike sheds at 12, we were crumbling up ecstasy tablets and speed and taking them at school … and smoking heroin at 15, 16 when I was an apprentice,” he said in a 2021 TV interview.

>>18784911 Spies seeking new defences for phone bugging and hacking - The Law Council of Australia has criticised proposed reforms to the national security legislation that will give spies extraordinary protections to interfere with facilities and modify telecommunications devices, saying the new laws need to be “reasonable, necessary and proportionate”. The amendment bill, which is currently being considered by the parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security, will grant intelligence agents legal defences to break into a target’s computer, track the geolocation of mobile devices and intercept messages and phone calls without a warrant.

>>18784922 Papua New Guinea backs an Albanese government push to embed Pacific island troops in Australian Defence Force - Papua New Guinea is backing an Albanese government push to embed Pacific island troops in the Australian Defence Force, opening the way for a new era of ­regional military co-operation to counter rising strategic threats. PNG Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko threw his support ­behind the plan as his country ­prepared to host Anthony Albanese, Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi this month for a meeting of Pacific ­island leaders.

>>18784945 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to have presented credentials to President Biden. Just got the happy snaps back. President firing on all cylinders (as he was at the White House Correspondents’ dinner). And Therese looks stunning.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919569

#29 - Part 9

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>18789832 Video: Russian Orthodox choir denounces group of men wearing pro-war Z symbol shirts at Sydney Town Hall event - A Russian Orthodox choir has distanced itself from a group of men who wore "disgusting" pro-Russia symbols to attend a government-sponsored performance in Sydney. Several men wearing shirts with the letter Z - a symbol representing support for Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine - gathered at the front of Sydney Town Hall following a performance of the Russian Orthodox Male Choir. Photos and video of the event have been shared in a social media group run by pro-Putin YouTuber Simeon Boikov, known as "Aussie Cossack". Ukraine's Ambassador to Australia Vasyl Myroshnychenko has condemned the group's attendance as a "disgusting public display". "Z stands for the Russian aggression in Ukraine, rape and murder," he said in a tweet.

>>18789864 How a T-shirt exposed a cultural rift in Sydney - Security agencies are being called to investigate a Russian choir concert, sponsored by a NSW government agency, after men wearing shirts supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine put on a show of force at Sydney’s Town Hall building. The choir is now severing links with ultranationalist groups in Australia. Men in black shirts, bearing the white “Z” symbol showing support for Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, were pictured walking into the performance on Friday night. The group of men posed in front of the stage as the crowd took their seats - one voice in the crowd was disgusted, others appeared supportive. One shook hands with the Russian consul-general.

>>18789901 Video: Albanese meets King, tells Piers Morgan he will pledge allegiance - Anthony Albanese has said he has no issues swearing allegiance to King Charles III during a public oath at this weekend’s historic coronation service and warned republicans that staging a vote on Australia’s future head of state was not imminent. The Australian prime minister met the King during a private audience at Buckingham Palace in London on Tuesday, in what was described as an “insightful and rewarding” meeting, where he reiterated there was an invitation for the royals to visit Australia next year. In an interview with controversial broadcaster Piers Morgan on Britain’s TalkTV, Albanese said he was certain that Australia would become a republic “at some stage in the future” but he preferred not to be a prime minister who “presides over just constitutional debates”.

>>18789935 Video: ‘What a stuttering mess’: Albanese’s response to controversial question slammed by trans-activists - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sparked backlash over his response to a controversial question posed by English journalist Piers Morgan. “What is a woman Prime Minister?” Morgan asked. “An adult female,” Mr Albanese replied instantly. In response, the British journalist proceeded to question: “how difficult was that to answer?” “Not too hard,” Mr Albanese said while slightly shrugging his shoulders and shaking his head. But his response quickly led to intense debate online, with some accusing the Prime Minister of not acknowledging transgender women in his statement. Trans activist and blogger Eleanor Evans said Mr Albanese used the question as an opportunity to “drop anti-trans dogwhistles while umming and ahhing about ‘respect’”.

>>18790019 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to catch up with California Governor @GavinNewsom. CA & (Australia) have a close economic & environmental partnership, & shared interests in climate, tech, & entertainment. 60k Aussies live in CA & 400+ (Australian) businesses active in this economy. You're always welcome down under Governor.

>>18790019 Q Post #2782 - [Example CA] - https://calmatters.org/articles/commentary/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/amp/? - What ‘family’ runs CA? They are all connected. Wealth-Power-Influence - [RIGGED] - The More You Know…. - Q - https://qanon.pub/#2782

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919571

#29 - Part 10

Australian Politics and Society - Part 10

>>18794944 ‘Disappointing’: Monash Council cancels drag queen story time event - Monash City Council has cancelled a drag queen story time event after threats of violence against families, the performer, councillors and staff escalated to include intimidation from neo-Nazis following a tense protest at its offices. The south-eastern council’s meeting in Glen Waverley was derailed last week when almost 200 people attended, many protesting against its sold-out drag queen event planned for children and parents at Oakleigh Library on May 19. Monash chief executive Dr Andi Diamond said the decision to scratch the event was made in consultation with Victoria Police. “It is incredibly disappointing to have to cancel an event designed to celebrate the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia, but we were left with no choice after Victoria Police advised council of the risks. In the end, we were unable to guarantee that we would be able to hold the event safely.”

>>18801113 Note from Washington: Forget Mr Ambassador -call him Kevin Everywhere - A new era of diplomacy began two weeks ago when Kevin Rudd presented his credentials to President Joe Biden at the White House, marking the official start of his term as Australia’s 23rd ambassador to the US. Since then, the former prime minister has wasted no time making his mark. “He’s been really aggressive - in a good way - in terms of reaching up to the Hill,” Democrat Congressman Joe Courtney said after he caught up with Rudd last week, when they discussed the AUKUS submarine pact and his “clear-eyed view of the challenge in the Indo-Pacific”.

>>18801116 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to catch up with @johnpodesta (senior adviser to @POTUS for clean energy innovation & implementation) ahead of President Biden’s visit to Australia in May. We need to maximise (Australia) & (United States) collaboration on climate solutions & the renewable energy transition

>>18824070 Donald J. Trump Truth: Bill Barr was a sloppy, lethargic mess as the Attorney General. He was lazy as hell, and petrified of the Radical Left Democrats, & the fact that they were going to impeach him. I wish they had, which would have meant that he was doing his job, which he wasn’t. Bad on Election Fraud & just about everything else he touched, Sloppy Bill is now a human sound bite, along with Karl Rove, Wacky Peggy “I hate Reagan” Noonan, & Paul Ryan, for Rupert Murdoch & his ANTI-TRUMP (just like 2016!) WSJ, Plus!

>>18824070 Donald J. Trump Truth: Rupert Murdoch, “Worst Republican Speaker ever” Paul Ryan, RINO KARL ROVE, The Wall Street Globalist Journal, and the rapidly disintegrating FoxNews, have gone all out, over the last 3 months, pushing and promoting Ron DeSanctimonious, a man who, without the help and Endorsement of President Donald J. Trump, would now be working at a McDonalds or, at a minimum, be far away from Tallahassee. Anyway, all of this RINO/GLOBALIST push from Election Undenier Murdoch has crushed DeSanctus in the Polls!

>>18835436 Security stoush erupts as Andrew Wilkie in frame for secretive committee - A rare stoush has erupted in parliament’s high-powered intelligence and security committee over a government push that could see whistleblower turned independent MP Andrew Wilkie return to the secretive body. The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Security and Intelligence has only had Labor and Coalition members throughout its history, besides a brief stint when Wilkie served on the committee during the minority Gillard government. The Labor majority on the committee, which receives classified intelligence briefings and oversees agencies such as ASIO and the Office of National Intelligence, is proposing to expand its membership from 11 to 13 MPs, extending membership to politicians outside the two major parties.

>>18835457 US Marine burned by exploding barbecue in Darwin sues US, Australian governments for millions - An ex-US Marine bomb technician set alight in a barbecue explosion while serving in Darwin is suing the governments of Australia and his home country for millions of dollars in damages. Evan James Williamson was on deployment in Darwin in 2019 as an aircraft ordinance technician at an Australian Army base in the Northern Territory city. The 25-year-old has claimed in court documents seen by the ABC that he received 30 per cent burns to his body after attempting to light a barbecue which officials knew had a gas leak.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919574

#29 - Part 11

Australian Politics and Society - Part 11

>>18835473 US Army Chief backs tanks, armoured vehicles amid Australian cuts - The head of the US Army insists tanks and armoured vehicles remain indispensable for modern-day battlefields, amid criticism of the Albanese government for cutting the number of next-generation troop carriers following a top-level military review. “From an army standpoint, I was asked the same question and my response was ‘You don’t need tanks unless you want to win’,” US Army Chief of Staff James McConville told journalists during a media roundtable in Canberra

>>18840513 Two arrested as neo-Nazi group clashes with police at Victorian Parliament - Two people were arrested after neo-Nazis returned to the steps of Victorian Parliament and clashed with police and counter-protesters, almost two months after fascists gatecrashed an anti-trans rights rally on Spring Street. Victoria Police, which deployed more than 200 officers across the city on Saturday, denounced the group of about 25 neo-Nazis who arrived an hour early for a midday “anti-immigration protest”.

>>18840746 The biggest takeaways from the Disability Royal Commission after four years of hearings - "Sexual assaults in the home and by carers. Children being removed from their mothers immediately after birth. Forced sterilisation. Getting paid $2.50 an hour for manual work. These are just some of the many disturbing accounts heard by the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability over the last four and a half years. For many in the disability community, these stories did not come as a surprise - they're well aware of the violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation they face. But with the four-year inquiry wrapping up its final public hearing this week, they want the wider Australian community to know about it, too. And they want everyone to know these situations are not confined to history - they are still happening today." - Nas Campanella and Evan Young - abc.net.au

>>18855229 Video: US special counsel slams FBI probe of Trump-Russia collusion sparked by Alexander Downer - The FBI has been blasted for launching a bombshell investigation of Donald Trump’s Russia links based on Australian intelligence which its lead agent admitted had “nothing to this”. Former Australian foreign affairs minister Alexander Downer inadvertently sparked the extraordinary saga during the 2016 presidential election when he wrote a diplomatic cable about a conversation he had with a junior official in Mr Trump’s campaign. New details of his role have been laid bare in a report by Trump-appointed special counsel John Durham, who spent four years investigating the FBI’s handling of the collusion probe and concluded it was “seriously flawed”.

>>18855354 Video: Ukraine enlists Eurovision stars to lobby Australia for Hawkei fighting vehicles - Ukraine's Eurovision stars Tvorchi have called on Australia for more help to fortify the country's "heart of steel", renewing calls for Australian-made Hawkei fighting vehicles. In a slick new social-media campaign from the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence, the two artists used their profile to make a personal plea to Australia for the additional support.

>>18860427 Joe Biden cancels Australia trip, Quad meeting in doubt - US President Joe Biden has cancelled his upcoming visits to Australia and Papua New Guinea in a blow to Anthony Albanese and to America’s standing in PNG as China looks to expand its influence in the country. Mr Biden was due to arrive in Sydney next week for the Quad leaders summit, which is now in doubt with the offices of both Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese PM Fumio Kishida confirming they were reconsidering their own travel plans. The cancellation comes amid intractable negotiations between Democrats and congressional Republicans over a looming US debt ceiling deadline.

>>18860803 Donald Trump Jr to bring ‘voice of Trumpism’ to Australia - Look out Australia - Donald Trump Jr is coming to town. The son of the 45th president of the United States, who has been described as “the voice of undiluted Trumpism”, said he will be making a three city speaking tour of Australia this July to talk about the “disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture … that has clearly taken hold (in Australia).” Organisers said they expected that the tour, which will run from July 9-11 and hit Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane, would draw “significant” attention due to Mr Trump’s “polarising” reputation and “divisive, anti-politically correct stances”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919576

#29 - Part 12

Australian Politics and Society - Part 12

>>18865983 Video: ‘Kids love drag’: Drag queen icon Shane Zenek on storytime scandal - After weeks of drag queen storytime events being cancelled over abuse and threats one of Australia’s most famous drag queens has issued an emotional tribute to those under attack. Shane Jenek, better known under the stage name Courtney Act told The Project that he recognised it was a difficult time for the “queer community when we are being discussed like this”. “But to love someone of the same gender or express your gender differently means you have to step outside the status quo and understand something of yourself,” he said. “Queer people are hear to save the world, to show we can think differently about the old decaying systems and we can make them better and celebrate that diversity.”

>>18871739 Former AFLW player El Chaston opens up on life-changing breast removal surgery to find their true self - "El Chaston is at peace. With life. With their gender identity. And after years of internal struggle, their body. It’s taken 21 years to get here. But just weeks before their 21st birthday, Chaston became their truest self, undergoing a removal of their breast tissue – essentially a double mastectomy, or “top surgery” – to reflect their non-binary identity. After years of pain, physical and mental, it “all just washed away”." - Lauren Wood, AFL and AFL Women's reporter for the Herald Sun and CODE Sports - theaustralian.com.au

>>18873902 Should doctors be banned from surgically ‘correcting’ intersex traits in children? - Clitorectomies, phalloplasty and gonadectomies on intersex children will be illegal without an urgent clinical justification, under draft ACT laws. Chief Minister Andrew Barr says doctors have performed inappropriate interventions, and the legislation - the first in Australia - is necessary to protect children from harm. It would ban significant deferrable surgeries affecting a child’s sex characteristics until the intersex child had capacity to consent, with potential penalties of up to $22,000 in fines or two years’ imprisonment.

>>18875192 Kevin Rudd defends Joe Biden over cancelled trip to Australia - US ambassador Kevin Rudd has rejected suggestions Joe Biden’s decision to cancel his trip to Australia and Papua New Guinea is a blow to America’s standing in the region, saying the diplomatic snub is a “very small thing”. “I think we need to take a step back to pull out our smelling salts and say, look, the postponement of a presidential visit in the scheme of all this is quite small,” Dr Rudd told National Public Radio in the US.

>>18875639 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post - Ambassador Caroline Kennedy, 27th U.S. Ambassador to Australia, visits Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, in the midst of Exercise Crocodile Response at Darwin, Australia, May 17, 2023. During her visit, Ambassador Kennedy experienced a ride in the MV-22B Osprey over the city of Darwin, met with key leaders of Marine Rotational Force Darwin, Defence Australia, and Indonesian National Armed Forces, and received an exercise overview briefing. Exercise Crocodile Response seeks to extend shared interoperability with partners throughout the Indo-Pacific region, increasing efficiencies in responding to Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief. #USEmbassy #FreeandOpenIndoPacific #AlliesandPartners

>>18875704 Video: Obama Praises Australia For Confiscating Citizens’ Guns - Former President Barack Obama praised Australia’s gun confiscation following a mass shooting during an interview that aired Tuesday morning. “We are unique among advanced, developed nations in tolerating, on a routine basis, gun violence in the form of shootings, mass shootings, suicides,” Obama told “CBS This Morning” co-host Nate Burleson. “In Australia, you had one mass shooting 50 years ago and they said, ‘No, we’re not doing that anymore.’ That is normally how you would expect a society to respond when your children are at risk.”

>>18876521 At G7 Summit, Biden apologises to Albanese for scrapping Sydney Quad meeting - US President Joe Biden will ask Congress to empower Australian manufacturers as a domestic source for arms manufacturing, binding the two countries’ defence production together as they confront the growing military might of China. Biden was due to travel to Australia for a Quad meeting in Sydney after the G7, but the summit was cancelled due to the US debt crisis. Biden apologised to Albanese for cancelling his trip to Australia and said negotiations with Republicans were “in their closing stages”. “I’m sorry I’m not taking a plane to Australia,” said Biden as the pair signed a climate and critical minerals’ pact. “All politics is local, but friendship is permanent.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919579

#29 - Part 13

Australian Politics and Society - Part 13

>>18876675 Donald Trump Jr. Tweet: Video: Donald Trump Jr. Live In Australia July 2023 with Turning Point Australia - https://trumplive.com.au

>>18885225 Vacuous Quad joint statement sets off warning bells - "What has made the Australia/US alliance so successful has been a record of practical defence and intelligence co-operation, decisions that put boots on the ground and bullets in the armouries of our defence forces. There was very little of that on display in Albanese’s engagement with Biden. A joint statement of the Quad leaders was released following a short meeting shoe-horned between the end of the G7 and a formal dinner. It’s a disappointing piece of work with a lot of bureaucratic verbiage and distressingly little substance." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

>>18885235 PM goes soft on Russia, China as other leaders step up to the mark in support of Ukraine - "Australia’s attendance at the G7 and Quad leaders meetings in Japan helps Anthony Albanese back home. It portrays him as a respected, influential international leader. But the price of sitting at these tables isn’t smiling and participating in photo opportunities, it’s action - and that’s where the problems can often start. On Ukraine, Australia has moved from an active, front-foot supporter of President Volodymyr Zelensky and his military to a country desperate not to be asked what it has done lately. And on China, the clear Australian government objective is to not create a ripple in the monster’s pond. Its approach is that nothing can be allowed to disturb the glacial lifting of Beijing’s coercive trade restrictions. Even more importantly, nothing must get in the way of the headline: “Albanese meets Xi”." - Michael Shoebridge, director of Strategic Analysis Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18890161 Indian PM Narendra Modi wants ‘next level’ friendship with Australia - Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has declared he wants to take the relationship with Australia to the “next level”, including closer defence and security ties to help ensure an “open and free” Indo-Pacific. Mr Modi said the growing strategic challenges in the region made India’s partnership with Australia more critical than ever.

>>18890184 Controversy dogs Donald Trump Jr’s upcoming tour - Australians are calling for Donald Trump Jr to be banned from the country before his planned speaking tour. Donald Trump’s eldest son will embark on a tour in July with dates in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, presented by Turning Point Australia. However, not all of the “amazing people” in Australia want Mr Trump Jr to enter the country. A petition that calls for him to be banned is gaining traction. At 9.30pm on Monday, an online petition calling for his ban has more than 3400 signatures.

>>18895116 ASIO warns neo-nazi groups are seeking to recruit more members - Right-wing terror threats make up roughly 30 per cent of ASIO's current counter-terror caseload, as the head of the agency warns they are growing in prominence to try and recruit more members. ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess was questioned during a Senate Estimates hearing whether recent public demonstrations signalled a growing threat from Neo-Nazi groups. Mr Burgess suggested while the demonstrations are becoming more brazen, they are primarily aimed at driving recruitment, and do not necessarily indicate a growing terror threat from Neo-Nazi groups.

>>18895125 Video: US Marines join Aussie and Indonesian troops for training in the Northern Territory - The Marine Rotational Force in Darwin has begun its first training for the year - Exercise Crocodile Response. Partnering with the ADF and the Indonesian National Military, the trilateral operation sharpens the groups' skills in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. - ABC News (Australia)

>>18895147 Video: Donald Trump Jr says it is important to fight for freedoms as he calls out radical left ahead of his Australian speaking tour - Donald Trump Jr has urged Australians to fight back against the rise of the radical left, as other nations are "laughing" at the West over its "stupidity". The eldest son of former United States president Donald Trump told Sky News Australia it was important to fight for freedoms and democracy to preserve traditional values of society, which he claimed had been lost in recent years.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919581

#29 - Part 14

Brittany Higgins’ Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 1

>>18708667 Relations between ACT Police and DPP ‘beset by tension’ over Brittany Higgins’ rape claim - An explosive complaint from the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions about police conduct before and during Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial lit the match that sparked the Board of Inquiry into the capital’s criminal justice systems. Walter Sofronoff KC, who is conducting the inquiry, held the Board’s first public hearing in Canberra this morning where it was revealed that the inquiry was established after DPP Shane Drumgold wrote to ACT Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan on November 1, 2022 alleging his officers had conducted 18 months of “inappropriate interference” in Bruce Lehrmann’s prosecution.

>>18723515 Man charged over threatening to kill Brittany Higgins, David Sharaz and their pet cavoodle - A NSW man has been charged after allegedly threatening to kill Brittany Higgins, her fiance and their pet cavoodle over social media. David William Wonnocot, 49, allegedly told Ms Higgins’ partner David Sharaz he would “kill you both when you least expect it” and that he was planning to “chop Kingston [pet dog] up into little pieces”, according to messages seen by The Australian. Terrorism squad detectives arrested the man at 10am on Wednesday in Tweed Heads on the NSW north coast and charged him with using a carriage service to make threats to kill and menace, harass and offend.

>>18734316 DPP Shane Drumgold complicit with Brittany Higgins’ bid to prejudice case, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer claims - The chief prosecutor in Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial was “complicit” in a bid by Brittany Higgins to prejudice the case against him, according to an extraordinary draft submission to the ACT ­Supreme Court prepared by Sydney barrister Arthur Moses SC. The explosive 36-page document obtained by The Australian sheds new light on developments in the Lehrmann case that have been shrouded in secrecy because of suppression orders imposed by ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum.

>>18766047 Bruce Lehrmann given go-ahead by Federal Court to sue journalists and media outlets over Brittany Higgins interviews - The Federal Court has given the go-ahead to former Liberal Party adviser Bruce Lehrmann's plan to sue media outlets over interviews they conducted with Brittany Higgins. In the interviews - which Mr Lehrmann argues identified him - Ms Higgins alleged she was raped in a parliamentary office in 2019. Mr Lehrmann had to ask the court for permission to lodge a defamation claim against Network Ten and News Life Media because the usual 12-month deadline for these claims had expired. Their stories about Ms Higgins aired and were published in February 2021. He also filed a separate claim against the ABC, which broadcast a speech Ms Higgins gave to the National Press Club in February 2022.

>>18814626 ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold takes the stand on first day of Board of Inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's trial - An inquiry into how criminal justice agencies handled the case against former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has heard journalist Lisa Wilkinson alleged she'd been treated unfairly by the ACT's top prosecutor. There were calls in some media reports for Wilkinson to face criminal proceedings for contempt of court over a speech she gave at the Logie Awards a week before Mr Lehrmann's trial was due to begin. Mr Drumgold accepted today that he did not fully comprehend the potential impact of Wilkinson's speech, should she win. "In hindsight it was not an unlikely hypothetical … I should have paid closer attention at the time," he told the inquiry.

>>18814642 Bruce Lehrmann attends first day of public hearings at Board of Inquiry into ACT’s criminal justice system - Shane Drumgold has told the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system that he is a “prosecutor, not a publicist” over his refusal to publicly clear Lisa Wilkinson of contempt after her Logies acceptance speech delayed Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial. Under intense examination from Counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC, Mr Drumgold conceded he did not give the issue adequate attention and believed Ms Wilkinson had brought up her nomination, in part, to brag about it. “I thought it was more about pointing out she was up for a Logie Award rather than seeking genuine advice,” he said. “In hindsight I should have taken a different approach.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919589

#29 - Part 15

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 2

>>18819307 Day one: The DPP may be in a world of pain over disclosure - "On day one of the Sofronoff inquiry, material before it - and now made public – suggests the ACT Director of Prosecutions may be in a world of pain. In his incendiary November letter to ACT chief police office Neil Gaughan, DPP Shane Drumgold said he wanted a public inquiry into the police handling of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations against Bruce Lehrmann. He’s got that, and so much more than he surely bargained for. Drumgold is central to this inquiry for reasons that will soon become clearer to all Australians. The most serious issues facing Drumgold, by a country mile, concern disclosure. Did the DPP disclose all material he was duty-bound to disclose to Lehrmann’s defence to ensure there was a fair trial?" - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18819337 Bombshell police dossier of Higgins’ ‘inconsistencies’ raises stakes - Shane Drumgold has sensationally claimed investigating police tried to sabotage the rape case against Bruce Lehrmann by heightening Brittany Higgins’ emotional distress in the hope she would be too traumatised to appear as a witness. The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions’ extraordinary attack on the Australian Federal Police officers was made in an 81-page statement to the Sofronoff inquiry, which has made public an explosive police dossier outlining inconsistencies in Brittany Higgins’ statements about her alleged rape. The police briefs, known as the Moller Reports, have been at the heart of the dispute between the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions and the Australian Federal Police

>>18819377 Video: DPP Shane Drumgold worried police opinions would ‘crush’ Brittany Higgins - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold did not want a document containing a senior police officer’s “gratuitous stereotyping” of Brittany Higgins’ credibility to fall into the hands of Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyers because of the “crushing” impact it would have on her. In a dramatic second day of testimony to the Sofronoff inquiry, the Director of Public Prosecutions conceded he may have “unintentionally” misled the ACT Supreme Court over an affidavit seeking to prevent the so-called Moller Report being given to Mr Lehrmann’s defence team.

>>18819394 Sofronoff inquiry: Shane Drumgold accused of withholding crucial documents - In a damning submission to the Sofronoff inquiry, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer has accused chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold of withholding crucial police documents that exposed discrepancies in Brittany Higgins’s rape claims and of alleging political interference and cover-up by Liberal ministers when there was no evidence of it. Mr Whybrow’s 75-page statement to the inquiry claims that Drumgold withheld a key police document from the defence that detailed “many inconsistencies in (Brittany Higgins’) evidence” and should have been disclosed.

>>18824011 Shane Drumgold SC feared conspiracy in Bruce Lehrmann rape case - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold SC has accused police who investigated rape allegations made by Brittany Higgins of “feeding inaccurate information” in a bid to derail the case against Bruce Lehrmann. Mr Drumgold told the Sofronoff inquiry he became concerned because there had been “significant problems” and investigators had “displayed a passionate interest in not proceeding”. Mr Drumgold said he expressed concern to investigators that a second AFP interview would traumatise Ms Higgins.

>>18824025 Senators reject DPP’s suggestion of political conspiracy in Lehrmann trial - Extraordinary allegations by the top prosecutor in the Bruce Lehrmann rape trial that there could have been a political conspiracy to derail the case have been vehemently denied by former Coalition ministers Michaelia Cash and Linda Reynolds. In explosive evidence delivered before an inquiry into the abandoned trial of Lehrmann - a former Liberal Party staffer - ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold SC said a series of “strange events” throughout the case led him to believe there was federal interference in the politically charged case.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919591

#29 - Part 16

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 3

>>18824039 How often can a Director of Public Prosecutions fall short of his duties? - "There is no doubt this was a high-profile, high-pressure investigation and trial. It occurred in the glare of the media, given Higgins’s choice to speak first to the media before proceeding with a formal complaint. It was coloured by activists who saw Higgins as the face of the #metoo movement, forgetting this was an allegation only. There was a vulnerable complainant at the centre of it. Government ministers and their staff were being impugned. Sofronoff will have to determine whether Drumgold, who, by his own admission, has said he did not turn his mind to a range of matters that he should have considered, lost objectivity, meaning he failed to exercise his extraordinary powers in line with his duties. In short, did a form of zealousness that is dangerous to justice set in at some point during this fiasco?" - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18829366 ACT's top prosecutor says he was wrong to suspect federal political interference in Bruce Lehrmann case - In a dramatic about-face, the ACT's top prosecutor, Shane Drumgold has told an inquiry he was mistaken to suspect political interference in the investigation of former Liberal Party adviser Bruce Lehrmann. "Your suspicions about the existence of political interference to prevent the case properly going ahead were mistaken?" inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff asked. "I do accept that," Mr Drumgold replied.

>>18829386 Shane Drumgold’s bizarre CCTV claim claim causes rift with police investigating Brittany Higgins rape allegation - A bizarre allegation of “disappeared” CCTV footage showing Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann at Parliament House on the night of her alleged rape caused a serious rift between the chief prosecutor and police investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation. The Australian understands police were furious that ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold seemed to be suggesting they had deliberately destroyed or deleted video that could have been used in Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial.

>>18829468 Sofronoff inquiry: Lisa Wilkinson refutes DPP claims over Logies speech - TV presenter Lisa Wilkinson has sensationally refuted claims by ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold that he warned her that her Logies speech could result in a delay in Bruce Lehrmann’s upcoming rape trial. Mr Drumgold claimed he told The Project host in a pre-trial conference days before the Logie Awards that the defence team could make a stay application “in the event of publicity”. In a statement to the Sofronoff Inquiry Ms Wilkinson says Mr Drumgold “did not at any time” give her the warning he claimed.

>>18835239 Sofronoff inquiry: ACT DPP Shane Drumgold’s future ‘hangs by a thread’ - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold’s future is hanging by a thread after a week before the Sofronoff inquiry in which he ­admitted serious professional ­errors and did an about-face on claims of a political conspiracy by former Liberal ministers to stop a police investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape claims. On Friday, ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury declined an invitation to express confidence in his Director of Public Prosecutions, after a fifth day of evidence in which Mr Drumgold again conceded “unintentionally” misleading the judge presiding over Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial.

>>18835288 Lehrmann DPP targets media in grilling by Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyer - Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyer has accused the ACT’s top prosecutor, Shane Drumgold, SC, of providing irrational responses to her questions during a lengthy exchange in which he claimed every media outlet misreported Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial. Defamation lawyer Sue Chrysanthou, SC, told an inquiry into authorities’ handling of the case that her client, a high-profile journalist, suffered “utter destruction” at the hands of the media for a Logies speech about Lehrmann’s accuser, Brittany Higgins, that caused the trial to be delayed.

>>18849860 AFP detective inspector ‘traumatised’ at prospect of Bruce Lehrmann rape conviction - One of the lead investigators in the case against Bruce Lehrmann was distressed and morally traumatised by the prospect of the former ministerial staffer being convicted over the rape of Brittany Higgins. Steven Whybrow SC, who represented Mr Lehrmann in the since-aborted trial, said Australian Federal Police Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman told him he believed the former ministerial staffer was innocent, and that if Mr Lehrmann was found guilty he would resign after the jury had retired to deliberate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919598

#29 - Part 17

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 4

>>18849877 The Project ignores the Sofronoff inquiry into the handling of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial - Channel 10’s flagship prime time news and a current affairs program, The Project, has completely ignored the Sofronoff inquiry into the handling of the rape case against Bruce Lehrmann, despite the network being the first media outlet to air an interview with the complainant Brittany Higgins. The weeknight show, predominantly hosted by Sarah Harris and Waleed Aly, last week did not make a single mention of the high-profile inquiry which has dominated newspaper front pages and TV and radio bulletins headlines all over the country since it began last Monday.

>>18855298 ‘Outrageous’: prosecutor’s texts over Higgins leak - A heated text message exchange between Bruce Lehrmann’s defence barrister Steven Whybrow and prosecutor Skye Jerome about revelations published in The Weekend Australian last year have been made public at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system. Mr Whybrow’s communications show that on December 3 last year Ms Jerome contacted him just after 7am demanding to know whether he had leaked the AFP’s investigative review document, now known as the Moller Report, to The Weekend Australian after an article detailing its contents was published that Saturday morning.

>>18855326 Secret court transcript reveals rogue juror ‘deeply sorry’ after causing Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial to be aborted - The confession of the juror who caused Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial to be sensationally aborted late last year can now be revealed, after the Sofronoff Inquiry released the transcript of a secret Supreme Court hearing. During the closed-court hearing on October 27 the juror, who cannot be identified, told Chief Justice McCallum they were “deeply sorry” for taking prohibited material into the jury room.

>>18860707 Did Shane Drumgold succumb to #MeToo zealotry in the Bruce Lehrmann case? - The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions has made some wild claims about political conspiracies between the Morrison government and the Australian Federal Police, between senior ministers and Bruce Lehrmann’s defence team, and between the AFP and defence lawyers. What on earth explains the long list of rash and ill-conceived decisions by the DPP? Was it #MeToo zealotry? Did political pressures ensnare him? Incompetence? Any mix of these possible factors is a dangerous concoction in the hands of a DPP who exercises the power and authority of the state against individual citizens.

>>18865851 DPP Shane Drumgold ‘on leave’ after Lehrmann inquiry evidence - The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold has taken sudden leave from his position after five days of bruising evidence about his handling of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation at the Sofronoff inquiry last week. Mr Drumgold has been replaced as DPP while the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system is underway.

>>18865869 Thanks for the break Shane Drumgold, now please don’t come back - "Shane Drumgold KC has done the right thing. He deserves credit for taking four weeks’ leave as Director of Public Prosecutions of the ACT. He would deserve more credit if he never returned. If he remains the territory’s top prosecutor, there is a risk that criminal justice will suffer. The evidence before Walter Sofronoff’s inquiry into the handling of the Bruce Lehrmann rape trial shows Drumgold sits at the centre of a network of dysfunctional professional relationships." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18875053 ABC to rely on ‘public interest’ defence in Bruce Lehrmann defamation case - The ABC will rely on a new public interest defence in its defamation battle against Bruce Lehrmann, arguing the broadcast of Brittany Higgins’ National Press Club address was of importance to Australians because it concerned the “safety of persons in Parliament House”. The public broadcaster’s defence also argued Mr Lehrmann had no grounds for defamation as he was not named during the broadcast.

>>18875089 Punching up: Will Bruce Lehrmann’s prosecutor survive his latest fight? - Shane Drumgold, SC, has been throwing punches all his life. Those he’s landed have won him gold medals for boxing at the national Masters Games, and the distinction of being the first Indigenous person to become a director of public prosecutions. Last week he threw some haymakers, against politicians, the media, and the police. But now the ACT’s top prosecutor is on the ropes for his part in the abandoned Parliament House rape trial of former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann, which has been described in the inquiry as the most talked about case since Lindy Chamberlain.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919600

#29 - Part 18

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 5

>>18876298 Video: ‘Verdict first, trial later’: rule of law under threat, says Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer Steven Whybrow SC - The presumption of innocence and the right to due process have been dangerously warped by the #MeToo movement, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer Steven Whybrow SC has claimed, in his first interview since Mr Lehrmann went on trial over Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations. “This was ‘Alice in Wonderland’. Sentence first or verdict first, trial later,” Mr Whybrow says of the pre-trial publicity around the case.

>>18876460 Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech about Brittany Higgins ‘kept Bruce Lehrmann out of jail’, says lawyer Steven Whybrow - Many people were aghast at Wilkinson’s speech in mid-June 2022. Her public praise of Brittany Higgins, who she had interviewed on The Project, and the implied celebration of the truth of her rape complaint against Lehrmann, within days of the commencement of the trial, would up-end the court process. “If Ms Wilkinson had not said the things she said at the Logies, and the trial judge had not adjourned the trial for three months, I genuinely believe Bruce would have been convicted,” Whybrow says.

>>18885147 Brittany Higgins ‘had to do media as face of #MeToo movement’: Victims advocate told cop - A senior police officer says when he asked that Brittany Higgins stop doing media that could prejudice Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial, Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates told him: “She can’t, Scott - she is the face of the movement now.” In a submission to the Sofronoff inquiry, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller says Ms Yates was “more interested in Ms Higgins pushing the ‘#metoo’ movement than being committed to the upcoming trial”.

>>18885169 DPP Shane Drumgold’s CCTV evidence tampering claim ‘vexatious’ - The senior police officer who led the investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape allegations has slammed Shane Drumgold for suggesting that police deliberately destroyed or deleted CCTV footage of Ms Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann, claiming the chief prosecutor had embarrassingly confused a Four Corners re-enactment with the real thing. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller has in a statement told the Sofronoff inquiry that the inference of corrupt or dishonest behaviour was “vexatious, without any merits and offensive to an extremely committed, hardworking and competent investigation team”.

>>18885211 Video: Pressure to ‘progress’ Bruce Lehrmann rape allegation forced police into medical leave, inquiry told - The senior police officer who oversaw the investigation of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann said that detectives were under so much pressure to progress the matter against their professional beliefs that many went on medical leave. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, who is giving evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system on Monday, told chair Walter Sofronoff KC that on August 5, 2021 Commander Michael Chew told him to have a summons served on Mr Lehrmann due to the “significant pressure” on police to charge the 29-year-old.

>>18890066 Sofronoff inquiry: Police ‘acted hour after boyfriend’s call’ - The police officer in charge of the investigation into Brittany Higgins’s rape allegations has revealed the immense pressure investigators were under to charge Bruce Lehrmann, culminating in a direct phone call from her boyfriend, David Sharaz, to a senior detective threatening to publicly condemn the time being taken. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller gave evidence to the Sofronoff inquiry on Monday that within an hour of Mr Sharaz calling Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, he was given ­instruct­ions to serve a summons on Mr Lehrmann for one count of sexual intercourse without consent.

>>18890091 Shane Drumgold lost objectivity in Bruce Lehrmann rape case, Sofronoff inquiry told - The senior police investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation got the impression that Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold was determined to prosecute the case, “no matter what” and was “dismissive” of investigators’ views, an inquiry has heard. During his second day of evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller said that Mr Drumgold had been verbally expressing his view that there was sufficient evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann “for months” before he had read the brief of evidence.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919602

#29 - Part 19

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 6

>>18895060 Brittany Higgins’ ‘drive to be in media’ made work difficult: top cop - The senior police officer who oversaw the investigation into Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation says the complainant’s “drive to be in the media” made their work “difficult”, and that the case impacted their relationship with the Victims of Crime Commissioner, Heidi Yates. During cross examination of Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, Heidi Yates’s lawyer, Peggy Dwyer, asserted that the Victims of Crime Commissioner was “well within her rights” to become Ms Higgins’ support person and act as a conduit between the complainant and police who were investigating her rape claim against Bruce Lehrmann.

>>18895074 Police officer who led investigation into Brittany Higgins's rape allegation reveals he is sexual assault survivor - The head investigator into Brittany Higgins's allegation that she had been raped has revealed he is a survivor of sexual assault. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller disclosed the information on his third day of giving evidence to an ACT board of inquiry, which is examining the conduct of criminal justice agencies in the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann. Wrapping up his time providing evidence, Superintendent Moller's lawyer, Matt Black, asked him what life experience he brought to his role with ACT police. Superintendent Moller told the inquiry that 45 years ago he was sexually assaulted. "I'm a survivor," he said. "That has driven my desire to make sure [other victims are supported]."

>>18900712 Brittany Higgins ‘naked and asleep’ on sofa not enough to charge Bruce Lehrmann with rape, Sofronoff inquiry told - A police officer investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations has told the Sofronoff inquiry that investigators had not established all three legal requirements necessary to charge Bruce Lehrmann with sexual assault. In evidence to the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system on Thursday, Senior Constable Emma Frizzell rejected a suggestion by Mark Tedeschi KC, who is representing the Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, that the first requirement was satisfied, namely, that there was “corroboration” that sexual intercourse took place.

>>18906031 Case against Bruce Lehrmann ‘very weak’: AFP Commander Michael Chew at Sofronoff inquiry - A high-ranking federal police officer says he believed the case against Bruce Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins was “very weak”, but he directed officers to push ahead because he was concerned that the media was compromising the former staffer’s right to a fair trial. AFP Commander Michael Chew, deputy chief of ACT Police between August 2018 and 2021, said he had had almost daily conversations with detective Superintendent Scott Moller about the strength and weakness of the evidence against Mr Lehrmann.

>>18906057 Media pressure behind timing of Lehrmann charge: police commander - An ACT deputy chief police officer who oversaw the Lehrmann rape investigation said the intense media pressure hanging over the police motivated him to direct the former Coalition staffer be charged in late 2021. Commander Michael Chew told his subordinate Detective Superintendent Scott Moller in early August “let’s just get it served and move on” against the backdrop of increasing public scrutiny and perceived delays in the investigation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919603

#29 - Part 20

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>18670474 Donald Trump winning 2024 US election will not change Aukus plans, Australia’s Albanese says - Australia is confident its agreement with the US to purchase a fleet of nuclear submarines for delivery in the early 2030s will go ahead no matter who wins the 2024 election, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

>>18670521 Anthony Albanese dismisses fears Australia-US ties will suffer if Trump reclaims White House - The AUKUS security pact will remain strong regardless of who ends up in the White House after the 2024 US election, the Prime Minister says. Anthony Albanese said he isn’t concerned for the future of the alliance with the US and the UK, despite the possibility of Donald Trump returning as president following next year’s election.

>>18670549 Anthony Albanese Tweet (7 January 2021): Democracy is precious and cannot be taken for granted - the violent insurrection in Washington is an assault on the rule of law and democracy. Donald Trump has encouraged this response and must now call on his supporters to stand down.

>>18670549 Video: (7 January 2021) Anthony Albanese blames Donald Trump for US Capitol violence - sbs.com.au

>>18682151 Video: Go inside one of the most powerful warships in the world - CNN's Will Ripley reports exclusively from one of the most powerful warships on the planet, the USS Mississippi, a U.S. nuclear submarine that's on high alert for threats from China.

>>18698843 Ignore the AUKUS hand-wringers, we need these subs for sea-bed battles: Navy chief - The nation’s navy chief has urged Australians to ignore “hand-wringing” doubters of the AUKUS pact, arguing a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines is necessary to fortify Australia against a potential attack on vital undersea cables. In his first interview since Prime Minister Anthony Albanese unveiled the details of the submarine plan last month, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond forcefully rejected claims the vessels could draw Australia into a war over Taiwan or that technological advances will render them obsolete before they arrive.

>>18708612 ‘He diminished his legacy’: Penny Wong, Paul Keating escalate feud - The feud between two of Labor’s most beloved figures has escalated, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong accusing Paul Keating of diminishing his legacy and the former prime minister attacking Wong for speaking in platitudes and lacking policy ambition. In an appearance at the National Press Club, Wong hit out at critics who take “self-satisfied potshots” at the United States, arguing America continues to play an indispensable role in promoting peace and security in the Asia-Pacific as it jostles with rival superpower China for influence. Wong said: “On Mr Keating, what I would say is this: I think in tone and substance he diminished both his legacy and the subject matter.” Keating responded to Wong’s speech by doubling down on his criticisms of both her and the government, saying in a statement: “Never before has a Labor government been so bereft of policy or policy ambition … I never expected more than platitudes from Penny Wong’s press club speech and as it turned out, I was not disappointed.”

>>18714036 China ‘a danger’ to accused AUKUS information seller Alexander Csergo - The Bondi businessman alleged to have sold AUKUS information to Chinese spies could be in danger from “people very interested in him not giving evidence against the Republic of China”, according to a magistrate who ruled that keeping him detained would help ensure his safety. Alexander Csergo was denied bail on the grounds he was a flight risk after a court heard he sold information about the AUKUS security agreement, lithium mining and iron ore to alleged Chinese agents in exchange for envelopes of cash.

>>18719406 Chinese-Australians ‘more wary of AUKUS’, Lowy survey finds - Chinese-Australians are significantly less supportive of the AUKUS alliance and the prospect of Australian military involvement in a US war against China than the broader Australian population, a new survey suggests. The Lowy Institute’s Being Chinese in Australia Poll also reveals a big jump in the proportion of Chinese-Australians expressing concern at “foreign interference” by the US in Australia’s political processes, from 36 per cent in 2021 to 62 per cent in the latest survey. They are less concerned about foreign interference by Beijing, with 54 per cent identifying it a problem compared with 50 per cent in 2021. The poll shows Chinese-Australians have much more confidence in Anthony Albanese (60 per cent) than they did his ­predecessor Scott Morrison (49 per cent), reflecting the Labor Prime Minister’s efforts to dial-down the friction between Canberra and Beijing.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919607

#29 - Part 21

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>18734520 AUKUS has opened a Pandora's box - "Under the painted veil of AUKUS lies the bad precedent set by the nuclear submarine cooperation among the US, the UK and Australia, in which a nuclear weapon state will transfer weapons-grade highly enriched uranium to a nonnuclear weapon state. This constitutes severe nuclear proliferation risks, runs counter to the purposes and goals of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and will create endless troubles." - Ruan Zongze, consul-general of the People's Republic of China in Brisbane, Australia - chinadaily.com.cn

>>18744491 Kiwis join clan as Hipkins backs AUKUS - New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has reassured Australia that his country remains firmly behind AUKUS, endorsing the move to acquire nuclear-powered submarine capabilities as necessary to protect the Indo-Pacific against emerging threats to a global rules-based order.

>>18749496 Retired US admiral who has previously advised Australia on shipbuilding to lead fresh review of navy's warship fleet - A former US admiral, who has previously chaired Australia's expert shipbuilding advisory panel, has been handed a new job leading another review of the navy's warship fleet to ensure it "complements" the new AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines. Retired US Vice Admiral William H Hilarides will conduct the fresh analysis with Australia's former finance secretary Rosemary Huxtable, and former Australian fleet commander, retired Vice-Admiral Stuart Mayer.

>>18749505 US senator warns AUKUS faces ‘significant’ workforce hurdles - The US politician who warned that AUKUS could push America’s shipbuilding yards to breaking point has renewed concerns about the pact, saying that a shortage of skilled workers was still a “significant impediment” to producing enough submarines on time. Democrat senator Jack Reed, who chairs the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee, said that while US shipyards had made some progress in recruiting workers and boosting production lines, it would be “a long, long process” to ensure the industry could keep pace with demand.

>>18760729 Retired US admirals charging Australian taxpayers thousands of dollars per day as defence consultants - A cavalcade of retired senior American military officers have landed high-paying advisory contracts with Australia's Department of Defence. Retired Admiral John Richardson, who headed the US Navy from 2015 to 2019, receives $US5,000 a day as a part-time consultant under a contract with Australia's defence department, struck last year. Details of the arrangements have been disclosed by the Pentagon for the first time, revealing how senior American officers have leveraged their military service over the past decade to obtain work from foreign governments, including in Australia. One of the more intriguing revelations from the Pentagon records is that the former US director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who resigned after Donald Trump's election as president in 2016, was then paid to work for Australia's new Office of National Intelligence. In 2017, the United States Air Force veteran - who had served as under secretary of defence for Intelligence - was appointed as a visiting Distinguished Professor at the Australian National University and addressed the National Press Club in Canberra. According to the newly released Pentagon records, Mr Clapper then in 2018 received an undisclosed sum to work with the Office of National Intelligence (ONI) in Canberra, which was formally established in December of that year. During his 2017 visit Mr Clapper had praised then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull's decision to create ONI as a single point of intelligence coordination which would bring Australia into line with its Five Eyes partners the US and UK.

>>18760729 https://qalerts.pub/?q=clapper - https://qalerts.pub/?q=JC - https://qalerts.pub/?q=J+C

>>18760742 AUKUS safe under Trump, says top US diplomat - One of the United States’ most experienced diplomats says AUKUS is likely to prosper if former president Donald Trump is re-elected. The comments were made to the Delphi Economic Forum, under way in Greece, by Richard Haass, who served four former presidents, including George W. Bush, and former secretary of state Colin Powell, and is now the outgoing head of the non-aligned Council of Foreign Relations. “I don’t think it would be particularly problematic in the sense that one of the, I would argue, contributions of the Trump foreign policy was to introduce a more realistic assessment of China,” Haass said. “And I would think that arrangements like AUKUS are consistent with that … I would think that arrangements like that would be likely to continue and to even prosper regardless [of who is in the Oval Office].”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919610

#29 - Part 22

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 3

>>18771201 Australia’s AUKUS partner red-faced after sub files found in pub’s toilet - Australia’s partner in the $368 billion AUKUS defence deal has been left red-faced after official documents about one of its Astute-class submarines were found in the toilets of a local pub. Files carrying details about HMS Anson were left in the Furness Railway in Cumbria, alongside a Royal Navy lanyard, and showed the inner workings of the nuclear-powered submarine and were used by submariners learning how to isolate and depressurise elements of its system.

>>18771231 TORPED’OH Secret plans from £1.3billion nuclear submarine found in toilet cubicle at Wetherspoons pub - SECRET nuclear sub plans were found in a toilet cubicle at a Wetherspoons pub. Classified files on £1.3billion HMS Anson had been dropped in The Furness Railway in Barrow, Cumbria. A source said: “It was lucky a Russian spy didn’t find them.” The files showed the inner workings of the torpedo-loaded vessel. Key detail on HMS Anson’s hydraulics, which control torpedo hatches, steering and buoyancy, were in the dossier. It was found in the boozer with a Royal Navy lanyard from the new £1.3bn vessel.

>>18794919 AUKUS as much about jobs as it is national security, Albanese says - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia’s contentious new joint nuclear submarine program with allies Britain and the United States is as much about providing domestic jobs and economic prosperity as it is about national security. Albanese, in the UK ahead of King Charles III’s coronation on Saturday, spoke after joining British Defence Secretary Ben Wallace on a tour of BAE Systems’ shipyard in Cumbria, where nuclear submarines will be built as part of the AUKUS agreement announced earlier this year alongside US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

>>18819462 Canada seeks to join non-nuclear pillar of AUKUS alliance - The Canadian government is seeking to join the non-nuclear component of AUKUS, a security pact between Australia, Britain and the United States that was struck to counter China’s rising military might in the Indo-Pacific region, according to two government sources. Canada was conspicuously absent when AUKUS was first announced in September, 2021. The three member countries are among this country’s closest allies, and like Canada they are members of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing partnership. National security experts feared Canada, a laggard on defence spending, was being excluded from a new “Three Eyes” group. Canada’s reason for wanting to join now is not to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, like Australia, but rather to participate in the second pillar of the AUKUS agreement, the two sources, both senior government officials, said. This non-nuclear part of AUKUS provides for information-sharing and close co-operation on accelerating development of cutting-edge technologies, including undersea defence capabilities, artificial intelligence, quantum technology and hypersonic warfare.

>>18875135 Joe Biden is skipping the Quad meeting over the US debt ceiling - but our underwhelming Defence Strategic Review will not have gone unnoticed, says Peter Jennings - "After promising the biggest defence shake-up in decades, the government’s mocked-up version of a public Defence Strategic Review delivered no new funding in the next four years, yet another review of the navy’s surface fleet and a botched redesign of the army aimed at saving money rather than modernising the force. Washington is constantly assessing whether Australia is really up to the demands that AUKUS co-operation implies. Failing to back our defence rhetoric with funding will have been noted. That type of complacency garners no presidential visits when other priorities are pressing." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

>>18875491 US warship to honour Canberra, cement AUKUS deal - For the first time in its 229 year history, the US Navy will commission one of its warships in a foreign country and name it after our capital Canberra in what will be a significant show of goodwill. The future USS Canberra will join the US fleet after its commissioning in what the US promises will be “a celebration it deserves” before it takes part in ADF exercise Talisman Sabre 2023. The Royal Australian Navy is understood to be preparing a fleet to welcome it to Australia ahead of its unique commissioning.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919612

#29 - Part 23

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 4

>>18875585 USS Canberra Will Join the U.S. Fleet in Australia to Honor Namesake - The future USS Canberra (LCS 30) will join the U.S. Navy active fleet on July 22 with the U.S. Navy’s first international commissioning ceremony at the Royal Australian Navy Fleet Base East in Sydney, Australia. Canberra is the first U.S. Navy warship to be commissioned in an allied country. It is the second U.S. Navy ship to bear the namesake of Canberra. Australian Chief of Navy, Vice Adm. Mark Hammond said this historic event encapsulates both the depth of the historical ties, and modern day partnership between the Royal Australian Navy and the U.S. Navy. “This is a unique demonstration of respect by the U.S. for the Officers and Sailors of the Royal Australian Navy,” said Hammond. “It is an opportunity to reflect on our shared history, and on a friendship forged while fighting side-by-side. On August 9, 1942 the RAN heavy cruiser HMAS Canberra was severely damaged off Guadalcanal (Solomon Islands) while protecting the U.S. Marines fighting ashore. In a surprise attack by a powerful Japanese naval force, Canberra was hit 24 times in less than two minutes and 84 of her crew were killed including Captain Frank Getting”

>>18890139 ASIO agents embedded in Defence to protect AUKUS secrets from foreign spies - ASIO officers are being embedded within the Defence Department to help prevent foreign spies from stealing the highly prized nuclear-powered submarine secrets Australia plans to acquire under the AUKUS pact with the United States and United Kingdom. ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess described AUKUS as a “great shiny example of something that foreign intelligence services would like to get insights on”, raising the importance of ensuring the Australian Defence Force has the best possible security protections as the nuclear-powered submarine plan advances.

#29 - Part 24

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial

>>18682161 Defence chief Angus Campbell warns of 'uncomfortable days' ahead on Afghanistan war crimes action - Australia's Defence chief has declined to say how many senior officers have faced punishment over the damning findings of the Afghanistan war crimes inquiry, but has warned of "uncomfortable days" ahead as more disciplinary action is taken.

>>18744643 Ben Roberts-Smith seeks access to military watchdog’s diary entries - War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith is locked in a legal fight with the Defence Force watchdog over access to diary entries that he alleges may reveal meetings with high-profile investigative journalist Chris Masters, who is at the centre of his defamation case. At a hearing of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Sydney, Roberts-Smith’s lawyers urged Justice Thomas Thawley to overturn a decision blocking his freedom of information request for diary entries belonging to the head of an inquiry into alleged misconduct by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan. The inquiry was conducted by the military watchdog, the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force.

>>18824052 Roberts-Smith still barred from Defence diary entries - Former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith will not receive access to diary and calendar entries showing possible meetings between a war crimes inquiry head and a journalist after nearly six years and multiple appeals. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) upheld that disclosing the diary entries and the calendar entry would involve unreasonable disclosures of personal information and would be contrary to the public interest.

>>18900749 Ben Roberts-Smith war crimes defamation verdict to be delivered on Thursday 1 June - Ben Roberts-Smith, Australia’s most decorated living soldier, will learn next Thursday if he has won his defamation case against three Australian newspapers over allegations he committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The judgment, to be delivered by Justice Anthony Besanko in Sydney on 1 June, will be the culmination of a near five-year legal process, after one of the most dramatic and consequential trials in Australian legal and military history.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919613

#29 - Part 25

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 1

>>18675306 Video: Populist Queensland Australian Senator, Pauline Hansen, gifted a document ‘left behind’ at a Canberra coffee shop by workers for the Voice referendum, details intentions to legislate incredible advantages to Aborigines.

>>18676743 Julian Leeser quits over Liberals’ stance on Indigenous voice to parliament - Julian Leeser has resigned from shadow cabinet and has vowed to campaign Yes ahead of the Indigenous voice referendum, after the Liberal Party opposed a national voice enshrined in the Constitution. In a press conference to announce his resignation, Mr Leeser said he had resigned on a “point of principle” and that he wanted to tell his children he stood up for something he “believed in”.

>>18676748 We must find common ground on the voice - "We must all understand the risk to our country, and the risk to our shared national reconciliation project, if the referendum fails. An all or nothing approach could deliver nothing. That’s why we must find common ground." - Julian Leeser - theaustralian.com.au

>>18676756 The risk for Peter Dutton: will Julian Leeser’s departure have a domino effect? - Julian Leeser’s resignation from the Coalition frontbench has dealt a damaging blow to Peter Dutton and his ability to maintain a unified party position in opposing the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government. The risk for Dutton is whether Leeser’s protest triggers a falling of the dominoes.

>>18682130 Anthony Albanese runs serious risk of dividing instead of uniting the nation, warns former Liberal frontbencher Julian Leeser - Julian Leeser has issued a stark warning to Anthony Albanese that his government risks dividing the country by failing to “seriously engage” with Coalition voters who want to support an Indigenous voice but have concerns over the model, after he quit the opposition frontbench and vowed to back the Yes campaign during the referendum.

>>18682138 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sacrificed nothing in debate of principles - "Leeser has worn much conservative criticism over the voice. He has been accused of being soft, wet, incapable and a closet leftie. But the nastiest barbs were delivered by Anthony Albanese during the past fortnight as the Coalition limped towards its position. Yet Albanese has not shed one drop of blood for the voice. He has not been abused by political allies. He certainly has not sacrificed any advancement. Rather, he has bathed in worship as a future Labor hero. It is Leeser, not Albanese, who has suffered for the courage of his convictions. The Prime Minister might privately admit to shame." - Emeritus professor Greg Cravenl, constitutional lawyer - theaustralian.com.au

>>18682146 Voice to parliament report exposes plenty of flaws, but no real solutions - "The voice is predicated on an assumption of wholesale failure and crisis in Aboriginal communities. It’s true some communities are in crisis, but the suggestion a voice could have prevented problems like those we’ve seen recently in Alice Springs is just plain wrong. A national voice couldn’t respond adequately even in a preventive manner. And, fundamentally, those problems stem from too many Aboriginal people not participating in the real economy. Being so tied to the public purse, the voice won’t have the first clue how to tackle that. The voice as articulated by the Calma-Langton report is fatally flawed: flawed in its claim this is what Aboriginal people want, flawed in its proposed structure and flawed in its approach to representation." - Warren Mundine, businessman and advocate for Indigenous economic participation - theaustralian.com.au

>>18687363 Leeser v Dutton v Albanese: the rival voice models explained - "A referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament will be held by the end of this year. So far, three models been put forward in a bid to achieve Constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We explain them here." - Rosie Lewis - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919618

#29 - Part 26

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 2

>>18693450 AFL great Eddie Betts backs the Voice: ‘It’s a small step, but the right step’ - AFL great Eddie Betts has thrown his support behind an Indigenous Voice to parliament, describing the proposal as a pathway to inclusion and respect in decision-making. The former Carlton and Adelaide Crows small forward and three-time All Australian said he had canvassed a range of views from within First Nations communities before coming to the decision. “It’s a small step, but I think the right step, to have a Voice and be heard.”

>>18698752 Real voices in referendum debate gagged by grand gesture to absolve white guilt - "In the lead-up to this year’s Indigenous voice to parliament referendum, you’ll hear repeatedly that Aboriginal people overwhelmingly want the voice. I don’t believe it. I meet a lot of Aboriginal people from all over the country and I always ask them what they think of the voice. Without fail, the response I hear is they oppose it, don’t understand it, or think it will just cement the monopoly of a small minority who already advise government. The entire concept of the voice is based on a false assumption of the homogeneity of Aboriginal people across the nation, as one race. This is something Indigenous Australians have tried to counter for decades. Now we find a government striving to entrench this in the Constitution. It won’t end well." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine - director of Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies and president of Recognise a Better Way - theaustralian.com.au

>>18703504 ‘Domino effect’: Liberal supporters of the Voice preparing formal Yes campaign - Liberal supporters of the Voice are mobilising to launch the party’s formal Yes campaign once a parliamentary inquiry settles on the wording of the referendum next month, hoping to double support inside the federal party room.

>>18708538 Raging moral coercion on the Indigenous voice to parliament is failing - "For the sake of the nation and its most vulnerable people, Julian Leeser and others attempting to sway Albanese and his Indigenous voice advisers should be encouraged. Australians should be given the opportunity to vote on a referendum they could support safely knowing it would not damage the country. The present strategy built on moral coercion is failing. National polling is clear in its ebbing support for the referendum." - Chris Mitchell - theaustralian.com.au

>>18713968 Jacinta Price promoted to shadow cabinet in Peter Dutton’s reshuffle - Northern Territory Country Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has been promoted to shadow cabinet in the Indigenous Australians portfolio in a reshuffle designed to strengthen Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s campaign against the Voice to parliament.

>>18713975 ‘Dramatic increase’ in false Aboriginality claims: Jacinta Price - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has warned of a “dramatic increase” in people falsely claiming to be Aboriginal because of the newly legislated voice in South Australia, as she leads the Coalition’s No campaign and is charged with delivering better outcomes for Indigenous people.

>>18713995 Video: The rapid rise of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Peter Dutton’s anti-Voice champion - In her first speech in the Senate last July, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price railed against what she described as pointless virtue signalling, saying nothing would help Indigenous children facing the “nightmare of terror” posed by sexual violence. Pitching the Voice as a vain proposal that would drive a wedge between black and white Australia, the firebrand new senator in a traditional Warlpiri headdress made the Canberra establishment sit up and take notice of her sharp rhetoric. Fast-forward 10 months and Price, still loudly prosecuting the same arguments, has vaulted to become one of the most prominent Indigenous figures in the country as the opposition’s Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman and a leader of the campaign to defeat the Voice referendum.

>>18714015 Indigenous voice to parliament yes vote is the first step to true equality of citizenship - "The absence of any protection of citizenship rights has affected the quality of Australian citizenship for all Australians and most profoundly for Indigenous Australians. Constitutional change to ensure the voices of Indigenous Australians are directly heard on laws affecting them is not only important for the recognition of First Nations Australians but necessary to enable equality of Australian citizenship. A Yes vote in the forthcoming referendum is the first step towards a commitment to an equality of Australian citizenship and should be supported by all Australians no matter what their political leanings." - Kim Rubenstein, professor in the faculty of business, government and law at the University of Canberra - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919619

#29 - Part 27

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 3

>>18719335 Video: Voice will ‘divide our family’: Price and husband front ‘No’ campaign ad - The Coalition’s newly appointed Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the Voice to parliament will divide her family, in a new campaign funded by right-wing lobby group Advance Australia launching on Wednesday night. Price and her Scottish-Australian husband Colin Lillie appear in a video, a portion of which was released on Wednesday by a new campaign outfit called Fair Australia, which describes itself as “a grassroots movement of Australians” but is run and paid for by Advance Australia. “Later this year they want to establish a so-called Voice to parliament. This is a really big deal,” Price says in the advertisement. “The Constitution is the rule book for governing the country, and they want the rules to change. This will divide us.”

>>18719348 Video: One, Together - Full Documentary - Warlpiri woman and mum of four, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price shares her story of being part of a blended family in Australia and her lived experience in remote Indigenous communities. "What's important to me is that we don't divide ourselves along the lines of race in this country. I don't want my family to be divided by race because we are a family of human beings and that's the bottom line." - www.fairaustralia.com.au - #VoteNOAustralia

>>18719352 So many clashing voices, so little of worth achieved, writes Nyunggai Warren Mundine - "This year Australians will vote at a referendum for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice. But the Albanese government refuses to discuss the details, pointing us to the 2021 Indigenous Voice Co-design Process report by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton. At 270 pages long the report makes for impenetrable reading. All for a supposedly advisory body with two dozen members. No other Australian government body or agency takes this long to explain. That’s because the voice is not an advisory body. It is a vast, expensive new bureaucracy that will interface at every level of government." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine, director of Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies, and president of Recognise a Better Way - theaustralian.com.au

>>18719359 Noel Pearson says Queensland must lead the push for Yes in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum - Noel Pearson says Queensland must be at the forefront of the Yes campaign for the referendum as he appealed to the state Liberal National Party to support the Indigenous voice to parliament. “I am very confident we are going to get five of the six states, I just wouldn’t like my home state to be the exception. I really want the government and opposition to really think seriously about how we can make Queenslanders vote for the right thing.”

>>18723374 Torment of the past demands voice for future, says Thomas Mayo - "For most Indigenous Australians, we seek constitutional recognition because of the love we have for our children and our country. After all, if this referendum fails, it will have detrimental impacts on the health and wellbeing of our families and communities for generations. If it succeeds, we know they will enjoy better lives. We must beat the tactics of confusion being deployed by the No campaign. We should share with fellow Australians that at this referendum we will be considering a simple proposition: to recognise Indigenous Australians by accepting a generous offer to share their history and culture as part of who we are as a nation, and to do it in a way that provides the practical means to improve outcomes in Indigenous communities." - Thomas Mayo - Kaurareg Aboriginal and Kalkalgal, Erubamle Torres Strait Islander man, and board member of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919620

#29 - Part 28

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 4

>>18723387 OPINION: The Voice, as proposed, is flawed and insulting to First Nations - "I am Australian. I’m a member of the Bundjalung First Nation of Australia, from my father’s side, and the Gumbaynggirr and Yuin First Nations of Australia from my mother’s side. And I oppose the Voice to parliament. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s proposed new chapter of the Constitution is stated to be “in recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia”. This is not recognition of Australia’s First Nations. All it does is recognise Aboriginal people as a homogenous race. Race can sometimes be convenient descriptor. But it’s a flawed, and insulting, basis for recognising Australia’s First Peoples in the Constitution. And history shows it’s a fraught basis on which to differentiate people’s rights. Race and nationhood are different. Don’t believe the spin. The Voice is not constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Nations. It will not - and cannot - represent First Nations and will more than likely be used as a tool to undermine them." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine, Activist and former politician - theage.com.au

>>18723399 Video: Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Queensland Indigenous population key to No campaign - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Queensland’s large Indigenous population could be key to carrying the state to a No vote in the voice to parliament referendum. Days after being elevated to Peter Dutton’s front bench, the Northern Territory senator visited Queensland parliament on Wednesday to meet with Liberal National MPs, whose party is yet to officially adopt a position on the voice. Queensland is shaping up as a crucial battleground in the referendum after an exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian this month showed it was the only state without majority support for enshrining a voice in the Constitution, with 49 per cent in favour and 43 per cent in the No camp.

>>18723408 Central Land Council attacks Jacinta Price over her commentary on Alice Springs crisis and stance on voice - The land council representing Aboriginal people of Alice Springs and surrounding communities has attacked opposition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price over her commentary on the Alice Springs crisis and her stance on the voice, saying: “she needs to stop pretending we are her people”. Yuendumu man Warren Williams, deputy chair of the council of 90 elected Aboriginal women and men from central Australia, was highly critical of the Alice Springs Senator in a media statement issued by the Central Land Council on Thursday. “We are tired of her playing politics with grass roots organisations our old people built have built to advocate for our rights and interests,” Mr Williams said. “Her people are the non-Aboriginal conservatives and the Canberra elite to which she wants to belong.”

>>18723421 Indigenous voice 'will paralyse parliament' - A former Supreme Court judge predicts the Indigenous voice will paralyse the Australian parliament and "in many cases the approval of the advisory body will have to be obtained before a bill can be enacted". Nicholas Hasluck KC, who retired from the West Australian Supreme Court in 2010, describes the proposal to entrench the Indigenous voice in the constitution as contrary to democratic ideals. In his written submission to the joint select committee inquiry into the voice, Mr Hasluck criticises one of the justifications offered for the advisory body offered by Anthony Albanese. Mr Albanese has said consulting Indigenous people about matters that affect them is good manners. "To say, as some have said in recent months, that the voice should be enshrined simply as a matter of ‘good manners’ is a shallow and misleading line of argument," Mr Hasluck writes in his submission to the voice Senate inquiry. "An emotive plea of this kind seeks to shame people into voting for the voice. A profound change to the structure of government by constitutional amendments should only be made in response to well reasoned debate on both sides of the question."

>>18728969 Video: Majority of voters in Queensland and South Australia oppose Voice to Parliament as support falls across all jurisdictions, according to Roy Morgan poll - Support for the Voice to Parliament has fallen across all six Australian states, with only one jurisdiction showing a majority would vote "Yes" in the referendum. New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania recorded single to double figure falls, according to the Roy Morgan poll. The largest drop in support was in Tasmania, with backing for the independent advisory body falling a massive 30 points down to 38 per cent.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919621

#29 - Part 29

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 5

>>18728985 Voice to Parliament would be an 'enhancement' to constitution, according to solicitor-general - The government’s top lawyer insists the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament would "enhance" Australia's system of government, arguing he does not believe it would "pose any threat" to the nation's parliamentary democracy. Solicitor-general Stephen Donaghue KC has also dismissed suggestions the creation of the advisory body, enshrined in the constitution, would lead to a deluge of legal challenges. The federal opposition has been demanding the solicitor-general’s advice to cabinet, provided during the drafting process, be published. That advice has not been provided to the committee.

>>18734240 Indigenous voice to parliament is solution looking for problem to solve and will only divide - "This year Australians will vote to introduce a constitutionally ­enshrined, vast and expensive new bureaucracy called the Indigenous voice to parliament. The voice will interface with every level of the commonwealth government apparatus, with every decision and policy subject to delay and/or judicial challenge if it is not paid proper homage. It’s inherently undemocratic for parliament, ministers, the public service and every government agency to be beholden to an unelected body. But even within the Aboriginal population, the voice won’t be a democratic instrument. Its members won’t be elected; but chosen by committee. The voice is a solution looking for a problem, demanded by a minority of Aboriginal elites. It will not help communities. And it will not reconcile our nation. It may well help tear those communities and our nation apart." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine, director of Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies, and president of Recognise a Better Way - theaustralian.com.au

>>18744291 Lidia Thorpe’s mum and allies in Victorian Voice bid - Lidia Thorpe’s mother, cousins and political allies are angling for control of the Victorian body that will act as the state’s Indigenous Voice and interact with a national Voice to parliament, generating unrest among some Victorian Indigenous leaders who fear the maverick senator’s influence.

>>18754991 Indigenous voice to parliament inquiry submissions are more petition than sound legal analysis - Over the next few weeks I plan to bring you some submissions from the joint parliamentary inquiry into the Indigenous voice to parliament proposal. The first point is that not all submissions are equal. Let’s start with the dumbest. For the crib note version of what has gone wrong with universities, read the submissions from the University of Sydney law school and Adelaide Law School. Each is a one-pager saying they are allies of the voice, describing it as legally sound and signed by a gaggle of academics. These are petitions, not submissions. This is groupthink meets sandstone arrogance: legal academics with nothing of substance to say, offering no legal analysis. It’s apparently enough that they say Yes. Seriously, what is the point of these law schools? - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18755008 Top jurist Terence Cole slams Albanese government’s Voice proposal - One of Australia’s leading jurists has blasted the Albanese government’s proposed Voice to Parliament referendum, saying it is “wrong in principle” and will “split the Australian people permanently into two groups based on race.” Terence Cole, a former judge on the NSW Court of Appeals who presided over two royal commissions, made the claims in a bombshell submission to a joint parliamentary committee on the Voice. In the submission Mr Cole noted that the voice is just one part of the broader program of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which calls for “treaty” and “truth telling” as well as a Voice to parliament, and which the Albanese government has accepted in its entirety. “The voice is critical to the objectives made clear in the Uluru Statement … that Aboriginals wish to establish … sovereignty over Australian territory, ownership of Australian land and surrounding waters … monetary and other compensation … (and) truth telling,” he wrote. “To achieve (these) objectives, it is necessary to split the Australian people permanently into two groups based solely on race … this is wrong in principle.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919622

#29 - Part 30

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 6

>>18760676 Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaign launches advertising blitz as support softens - The Yes campaign will launch an advertising blitz this week amid falling support for Anthony Albanese’s referendum to constitutionally enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament. SEC Newgate Mood of the Nation tracking polling reveals a further softening in voter support for a voice to parliament, dropping from a 59 per cent high ahead of last year’s May federal election to 52 per cent this month. While the survey of 1200 voters, conducted between April 13 and 18, shows a slim majority in favour of the voice, there has been a hardening in opposition to the Indigenous advisory body. The poll, which did not reference the constitutional amendment wording that a voice advisory body would also make representations to the executive government, found opposition against the referendum had risen from 16 to 27 per cent.

>>18760683 Video: Join Us - ‘Join Us’ is just the first step in a many months-long conversation with Australians between now and the referendum, which will include more national commercials and talking to everyday Australians about the opportunity to be part of a successful referendum. - www.yes23.com.au/joinus - #yes23

>>18760697 Indigenous voice referendum results may not be known on voting day, AEC commissioner warns - The result of the Indigenous voice referendum may not be known on voting day or for some time afterward, with the electoral commissioner warning people “may be disappointed” if they expect a definitive answer on the night. The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is also concerned about dangerous mis- and disinformation circulating ahead of the referendum, already stamping out voting-related conspiracy theories imported from the US. Polling workers will also get more training and security after what the commissioner, Tom Rogers, called “disturbing” incidents at recent elections, including staff being filmed and accused of stealing ballot papers, and online threats of violence. The AEC is still debunking claims about Dominion voting machines, an electoral technology at the centre of conspiracy theories around the 2020 US election, but which Australia has never used.

>>18766026 Barrister Clive Steirn won’t have a bar of Indigenous voice to parliament support - A barrister has fired criticism at the NSW Bar Association for issuing its public support for the proposed Indigenous voice model and lambasted the Bar president for speaking on behalf of members without consultation, claiming the voice could open the floodgates to High Court challenges. Clive Steirn SC has joined barrister Louise Clegg in lashing the Bar council for essentially claiming it has a mandate from its members to support the voice in the absence of debate.

>>18770882 Pearson slams ‘weak’ Dutton, former Liberal PMs on Indigenous recognition - Voice architect Noel Pearson has delivered a stinging condemnation of contemporary Coalition leaders, accusing them of being too weak to embrace the task of changing the Constitution to acknowledge Indigenous Australians. Lamenting what he claimed were lies stemming from the No campaign, Pearson said Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who is campaigning against the Voice, was defined by his right-leaning party room. “He’s too weak to have shifted them and shown the necessary leadership to move his party out of the rut that it’s in,” Pearson said.

>>18775333 Victorian Coalition frontbenchers speak out in push for free vote on Voice - Senior state Coalition MPs will push for a free vote on the Indigenous Voice to parliament, putting them at odds with their federal counterparts who will campaign against constitutional change. The Victorian parliamentary Liberal Party hasn’t reached a formal position on the Voice to parliament, but leader John Pesutto has so far refused to back federal leader Peter Dutton’s opposition to a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous Voice.

>>18775344 Yes vote for the Voice is leading in every state and territory: Poll - The Yes campaign to enshrine an Indigenous Voice within Australia’s constitution is ahead in every state and territory, the most comprehensive poll conducted on the proposal has revealed, placing it on course to deliver the first referendum to pass in four decades. The first dedicated state-by-state poll on the Voice to parliament has recorded the Yes vote on 51 per cent across the nation, while 34 per cent said they would vote No and 15 per cent were undecided. It would also reach the critical benchmark of support in a majority of states, while the Yes side was ahead in Queensland and Western Australia but fell short of 50 per cent support. The YouGov poll of 15,060 Australians was commissioned by the group behind the Uluru Statement from the Heart and is the largest poll conducted on the upcoming referendum.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919624

#29 - Part 31

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 7

>>18779729 ‘Very important issue’: Victorian Liberals granted free vote on Voice, at odds with federal counterparts - Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto will allow all his MPs a free vote on the Indigenous Voice to federal parliament, saying his members value the freedom to make their own choices on significant national issues. Pesutto confirmed on Monday afternoon that his shadow cabinet had agreed to give MPs the right to campaign and vote Yes or No, rather than forcing them into a party position. This puts the state Coalition at odds with federal leader Peter Dutton, who has forced his frontbench to campaign against constitutional change.

>>18779763 Brisbane Labour Day march 2023: Overwhelming support for Voice - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, visiting Brisbane, recommitted his government to the implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, starting with the Voice. “We will give Australians the opportunity to vote yes for a better future in the last quarter of this year.”

>>18784833 Splinter group emerges among Liberals refusing to reveal how they will vote in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum - A splinter group of Liberal MPs is refusing to declare its position on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, with five confirming they will not participate in either the Yes or the No campaign. In a sign of deepening division in the party, analysis by The Australian reveals at least 10 per cent of Liberal backbenchers, shadow ministers and shadow assistant ministers will abstain from the referendum campaign trail, while 12 per cent are refusing to say how they’ll vote on polling day.

>>18784850 Cricket Australia set to brief Pat Cummins, Meg Lanning and other senior stars ahead of ‘The Voice’ referendum - Pat Cummins, Meg Lanning and other senior Australian cricketers are set to be given a special briefing about The Voice before they head off for the Ashes. Cricket Australia plans to come out publicly with a position on The Voice in the coming weeks and wishes to consult with its stars beforehand and provide an opportunity for players to ask questions.

>>18789757 Scars of rejection will run deep if the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum fails, says historian Henry Reynolds - "If the referendum is lost, a new, younger generation may return to the streets with campaigns of direct action. Others could well conclude that their campaign for self-determination and treaties will gather strength by taking the struggle offshore to Geneva and New York, where they would find that Australia had few friends in the erstwhile colonial world." - Henry Reynolds, historian of Australia’s frontier conflict - theaustralian.com.au

>>18789782 Video: Indigenous voice to parliament Yes ad campaign is ‘misleading’ claims Advance Australia - The Yes campaign’s video advertisement urging viewers to vote in favour of constitutional recognition of an Indigenous voice to parliament is “misleading”, right-leaning ­activist group Advance Australia has claimed. Executive Director Matthew Sheahan said the advertisement’s claim that a Yes vote at the referendum would give Australians “a real say” was misleading because “there is no guarantee what a future voice will make representations on and how the parliament of the day will respond”.

>>18789803 West Coast Eagles join the Collingwood Magpies in supporting Voice to Parliament - The West Coast Eagles have become the latest AFL club to come out in support of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament. The Perth-based team issued a statement on Tuesday revealing its backing for the constitutional change that Australians will vote on between October and December. West Coast's decision was made public about a month after the Collingwood Magpies confirmed its board was in support of the Voice.

>>18794875 Victorian Bar’s Indigenous voice to parliament comment ‘exceeds its power’ - A Victorian barrister has told the state Bar Council it would “exceed its powers” if it made a public statement on the Indigenous voice to parliament, as rumours swirl that the institution is tilting in favour of supporting the proposed model. Former Victorian Bar councillor Lana Collaris, who is adamant the state Bar would undermine its independence if it announced a position on the voice, also labelled Bar president Sam Hay “weak” for failing to state his personal view on the matter.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919625

#29 - Part 32

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 8

>>18794901 Video: Liberal MP accused of ignoring Aboriginal voices at community forum on the Voice - An Aboriginal elder claims she and other Indigenous people were ignored at a community forum on the Voice to parliament hosted by Liberal MP for Hughes Jenny Ware, and featuring former prime minister Tony Abbott and journalist Joe Hildebrand as its main speakers. The panel event, streamed live on Ware’s official Facebook page, was drawing to a close after Abbott and Hildebrand had debated for an hour and half and fielded four questions from the audience when an Indigenous man interrupted to say an Aboriginal perspective was needed. The man’s intervention was preceded by another audience member, who is associated with the Yes campaign, interjecting during Ware’s final remarks to say: “Can we please hear from a First Nations person before we go?” Ware responded: “We simply do not have the time.” As Ware pressed ahead, a man who identified himself as Dhungutti and Gumbaynggirr from the NSW mid-north coast, walked onto the stage and took over the lectern, saying: “Maybe you should hear it from an Aboriginal side.”

>>18819428 Bar councillors vote on voice ‘conflict of interest’ - The Victorian Bar Council will vote on whether three councillors who signed a motion urging the Bar issue its public support for the Indigenous voice should remove themselves from any discussion on the referendum moving forward. The Victorian Bar Council vice-president Elizabeth Bennett SC, councillor Colin Mandy SC and councillor Fiona Livingston-Clark put their names to a motion proposing the Bar back Anthony Albanese’s proposed voice model, as the NSW Bar Association have done. However, some Bar members believe that by attaching their names to the motion, the three councillors have compromised their independence.

>>18819440 Victorian Law Institute vows to back the Indigenous voice to parliament - The Law Institute of Victoria has vowed to back the Indigenous voice despite conceding some of its members may hold an opposing view. Its support comes as infighting persists at the Victorian Bar Association over the issue, and all 2200 members gear up to vote on whether the association should release a unified position. The Law Institute of Victoria, which represents 18,000 lawyers across the state, released a media statement on Tuesday declaring its “public support to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice in the Constitution”. “We believe that establishing a constitutionally enshrined Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice is a long-overdue constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Nations peoples,” Institute President Tania Wolff said.

>>18829336 Should you vote for the voice? - "It is clear that the voice model was designed in a rush and not cognisant of the complexity that exists in Aboriginal affairs. The Voice would change the nature of our democracy that is predicated on the value of equality of all citizens. It threatens to reintroduce segregation to Australian society via the Constitution and the parliament. We have already seen the division this model has caused, the race hate that has emerged weirdly from the proponents of the YES vote when they accuse NO vote proponents of racism." - Victoria Grieves Williams is Aboriginal, Warraimaay from the midnorth coast of NSW, and an historian - theaustralian.com.au

>>18829360 Key 'No' camps merge to form Australians for Unity to strengthen referendum campaign - The two campaigns pushing for a No vote to the forthcoming Voice to Parliament referendum have merged, in a move that is aimed at unifying their message and strengthening their campaign. Until now, the two main groups were the Warren Mundine-led Recognise a Better Way, and Fair Australia, the group with the backing of shadow Indigenous Australians Minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. The joint campaign will be called 'Australians for Unity', and Senator Nampijinpa Price and Mr Mundine will be campaign spokespeople.

>>18835099 Altered Indigenous voice to parliament out of question, says inquiry - Australians will be asked to vote for an Indigenous voice to parliament and “executive government” after a Labor-dominated parliamentary committee endorsed Anthony Albanese’s proposed constitutional amendment without change, deepening the political battle over the referendum process. The Liberals and Nationals, who made up less than a third of committee members, issued dissenting reports attacking as insufficient the six-week time frame given to the inquiry.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919626

#29 - Part 33

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 9

>>18835159 Video: Google AI chatbot Bard thinks Lidia Thorpe is ‘a role model’, backs an Indigenous voice to parliament and labels Peter Dutton ‘controversial’ Google’s new AI chatbot backs the Indigenous voice to parliament as a “positive step”, praises Anthony Albanese as a “man of the people”, and labels Peter Dutton and Scott Morrison as “controversial”, sparking concerns over political bias and “propaganda” from Big Tech. Bard is Google’s answer to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which launched in November last year and reportedly set off a “code red” within the search giant. The service, still in an experimental state, was made publicly available in 180 countries. While Google says its chatbot does not set out to have political opinions, experts said the digital titan had rushed its chatbot, the new AI system “confidently declares untruths and opinions” and chatbots need more regulation.

>>18840240 Voice myths debunked: Thomas Mayo - "I have recently seen a full-page advertisement filled with false statements under the guise of a minor political party. The advertisement, in big bold letters stated, “It’s OK to say NO”. You can expect more advertisements like it. And some politicians, as usual, are seeking to make this constitutional moment about them. But the referendum is about us, as Australians, not the politicians. I decided to write this article for your reference, to debunk the false statements in the “No” campaign advertisement." - Thomas Mayo, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander man, national Indigenous officer of the Maritime Union of Australia, and director on the board of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition.

>>18840266 Australian sport ‘should stay out of the voice debate’ urges former prime minister John Howard - Former prime minister and renowned cricket tragic John Howard is urging sporting organisations to keep politics out of sport and not publicly declare a position on the referendum campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament. “Sporting bodies should not get involved in partisan political debates. They should stay out of the voice debate. For a national or state body to take a position on the voice is potentially divisive and disturbing to fans and followers,” Mr Howard told The Weekend Australian.

>>18840422 Google quietly changes progressive AI chatbot Bard on Indigenous voice to parliament, Coalition calls on government response - Following accusations of overt political bias, Google has quietly changed its new AI chatbot to stonewall questions that mention the Indigenous voice to parliament, after the tech giant was heavily criticised for saying the voice would be “a valuable addition to our democracy”. On Friday 12 May, The Australian’s front-page story quoted Bard on Thursday as saying the voice was a “positive step towards reconciliation between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the rest of Australia. I believe that the voice to parliament would be a valuable addition to our democracy,” it said. But on Friday, Bard’s opinions had mysteriously vanished and instead it simply replied: “I’m a language model and don’t have the capacity to help with that.”

>>18849787 Victorian Bar: ‘We backed same-sex marriage, we can back the voice’ - The Victorian Bar has firm ground to support the Indigenous voice parliament because it once supported same-sex marriage in the face of the plebiscite, a leaked memorandum urging Bar members to vote Yes in a poll deciding if the association publicly backs the voice suggests. The 20-page memorandum, sent to all 2200 Bar members, comes as the association gears up for a poll on whether or not it should support the Indigenous voice, and opposing camps start work to convince members to vote their way.

>>18849819 Treaty settlements could cost hundreds of millions and depend on size of massacres - Treaty deals between Aboriginal Australians and state governments are likely to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars apiece and factor in the number of Indigenous people killed in historic local massacres, as Queensland looks to New Zealand and Canadian agreements to guide its new reconciliation laws. Days after passing a treaty process touted as “setting the standard” in Indigenous-government relations, Queensland cabinet minister Craig Crawford told The Australian the amount of land taken by British colonial forces and the impact of massacres could be key considerations in formulating the value of each deal made with local Aboriginal groups.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919627

#29 - Part 34

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 10

>>18855233 Indigenous treaty negotiations to include mine veto in Queensland - Indigenous corporations will push for the power to veto mines in environmentally and culturally sensitive areas as part of landmark treaty negotiations with the Queensland government. Joshua Gorringe, the general manager of the Mithaka Aboriginal Corporation in western Queensland, says a priority for a future Mithaka treaty with the state would be the right to block resources projects on their traditional land.

>>18855259 AFL Commission set to work on league’s position on Voice to Parliament - The Australian Football League has asked all clubs to form a position on the Voice and has also liaised with its National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Council. The league seems likely to support the Voice given the large number of Indigenous players who bless the game, with AFL champion Eddie Betts already throwing his support behind a yes vote for the referendum.

>>18855269 Richmond FC Tweet: Empowering and listening to Indigenous voices has made Richmond a better Club. We are richer for it, a more connected and culturally safe Club. It has strengthened us on and off the field. We recognise and respect people's right to form their own views, but the lived experience of our Football Club means we fully support the proposed Voice to Parliament and a Yes vote.

>>18860464 Voice support slides again as debate rages over model - Support for the Indigenous Voice has tumbled from 58 to 53 per cent over the past month in the crucial “yes or no” question that will decide a referendum on the issue later this year, deepening the risk of defeat after furious disputes on the change. The sharp fall in support includes pivotal shifts against the Voice in big states such as Queensland and volatile swings in smaller states that challenge assumptions that Australians will cast a majority vote for the contentious change to the Constitution.

>>18860464 Voice support slides again as debate rages over model - Support for the Indigenous Voice has tumbled from 58 to 53 per cent over the past month in the crucial “yes or no” question that will decide a referendum on the issue later this year, deepening the risk of defeat after furious disputes on the change. The sharp fall in support includes pivotal shifts against the Voice in big states such as Queensland and volatile swings in smaller states that challenge assumptions that Australians will cast a majority vote for the contentious change to the Constitution.

>>18860523 US-style treaties in Australia will only entrench racial turmoil - "Treaties with Indigenous nations are being explored by every state government, often trained in the task by academics. But what model does this activism follow? What “settler” nation has a reconciliation plan worth emulating? Progressive activists variously advocate a hybrid of Canada, New Zealand and South Africa. None is particularly suited to Australian conditions. People of colour have endured horrific prejudice in the respective histories of Australia and the US, from massacres to slavery. But this white-on-black narrative - once vital - is increasingly a caricature that elides the more widespread problem of intra-racial crime. In US cities and Australian outback communities, black-on-black violence now dwarfs that which may have a racist, “white supremacist” motivation." - Timothy J Lynch, professor of American politics at the University of Melbourne - theaustralian.com.au

>>18860597 Indigenous man condemns voice no campaign for claiming he is Vincent Lingiari’s grandson - An Indigenous man incorrectly identified by the voice referendum no campaign as “Vincent Lingiari’s grandson” says he is not related to the land rights leader and feels “humiliated” by the way his image has been used. No voice leader Warren Mundine has stood by his campaign’s claims, claiming that Stewart Lingiari had described himself as Vincent’s grandson in a “cultural kinship” sense, rather than directly.

>>18860644 ‘Why be divisive?’ Rugby wrestles with the Voice to parliament - Rugby Australia is facing pressure from within to take a neutral stance on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, with at least one Super Rugby club urging the governing body not to mix sport and politics. Brumbies chairman Matthew Nobbs said the ACT Rugby board had taken the unanimous view that the club should not take a position on the matter and hoped RA would do the same.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919629

#29 - Part 35

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 11

>>18860648 I was wrong on Indigenous voice to parliament: Brumbies rugby boss Matthew Nobbs apologises - ACT Brumbies chairman Matthew Nobbs, who says politics and sport don’t mix, has apologised after failing to consult key stakeholders, including the rugby club’s playing group, before commenting on the Indigenous voice to parliament. Mr Nobbs released an apology statement after he publicly said the Brumbies board had taken the unanimous view that the club should not take a position on the voice and hoped Rugby Australia would do the same. The Super Rugby club chair said he should not have made the comments without consulting the players and the club’s Indigenous cultural advisory group on the issue of constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians.

>>18865735 As the penny drops, so does support for the Indigenous voice to parliament - "The campaign for an Indigenous voice to be entrenched in the Constitution is now in deep trouble. The latest Resolve polling shows the Yes vote has dropped from 64 per cent late last year, to 58 per cent earlier this year, to just 53 per cent now. This will get only worse as more questions emerge that voice proponents can’t (or won’t) answer. And while just about everyone would be happy to see Indigenous people formally recognised in the Constitution as the First Australians, it’s far from clear that a super-majority of voters are prepared to give the government what amounts to a blank cheque for a change that’s so much more than that." - Peta Credlin - theaustralian.com.au

>>18865753 ‘I’m terrified we’ll lose’: Voice advocate pleads for compromise to save referendum - Eminent Indigenous leader Mick Gooda says he is terrified the Voice to parliament referendum will fail, and Professor Tom Calma, one of the architects of the proposal, has conceded support for change is not high enough. But leading referendum backers are calling for calm on the path to winning the battle for Indigenous recognition, following results of a poll, conducted by Resolve Strategic that showed a dramatic tightening in the referendum race.

>>18865788 AFL announces support for First Nations Voice to Parliament - The Australian Football League has officially declared its support for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament. The league said while it encouraged “everyone to seek the information they need to form their own views on the referendum, the AFL proudly supports the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian Constitution through the Voice to Parliament”.

>>18865807 ‘Let’s get it over the line’: Rugby Australia and AFL back Indigenous voice to parliament - The AFL and Rugby Australia have become the latest Australian sporting codes to declare support for the yes vote, with both organisations making clear their positions on the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum on Thursday. In a full-page advertisement taken out in the Nine newspapers, a statement endorsed by RA’s board said it was time to institute a “level playing field” for First Nations people.

>>18865820 OPINION: Has Albanese misjudged the Voice of the Australian people - Yes or No? - "The campaign for the Indigenous Voice is in dire need of more time to rethink its strategy in light of growing evidence it is falling behind in the race to a referendum later this year. Time, however, is running out. A critical point is coming in the next few weeks when parliament must decide the reform proposal to put to the Australian people. This is not an election campaign when policies can be altered at the last minute and revealed a few weeks before polling day. It is a referendum that asks voters to endorse a proposal that is released months earlier and cannot be easily changed. The danger for the Yes camp is that it cements a reform model in June that loses majority support by August and is a smoking ruin by November, with untold damage to reconciliation." - David Crowe, chief political correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age - theage.com.au

>>18874922 ‘Bedwetter’: Noel Pearson rubbishes Mick Gooda’s voice suggestion - Cape York Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has rubbished renewed calls to remove from the voice to parliament proposal the power to advise executive government. “Mick Gooda’s wrong,” Mr Pearson told ABC’s RN. Mr Pearson said Mr Gooda’s intervention was akin to “wetting the bed”. “He was opposed to the voice. He only wanted symbolic recognition. So he has form in relation to the position that he’s taken. But, you know, this early bed-wetting just when we’re yet to start the campaign proper is not right. He does not represent Indigenous people in the position he’s taken.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919630

#29 - Part 36

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 12

>>18874989 Video: Liberals marshall No campaign on Voice wording as Yes side dispute erupts - A bitter dispute has broken out in the Yes camp over the wording of the Voice to parliament referendum as the Liberal Party takes a leap in its effort to convince Australians to reject the constitutional change. Voice architect Noel Pearson on Friday launched a personal attack on Indigenous leader Mick Gooda, who had spoken of his fears the referendum would fail, labelling him a “bed-wetter” who had done little for Indigenous people. Gooda, a former social justice commissioner and royal commission leader, fought back by warning Pearson his bullying undermined the referendum, echoing the private concerns of some Voice advocates who worry Pearson’s regular invective is unhelpful.

>>18875023 Indigenous voice to parliament: Liberal MP Aaron Violi could be swayed by change in wording - Liberal MPs with concerns over the Indigenous voice to parliament would consider backing the Yes campaign if Labor removed “executive government” from the constitutional amendment due to be debated in parliament next week. Casey MP Aaron Violi said the legal challenges presented by the voice being allowed to advise executive government was one of his key sticking points. “If the government made a meaningful attempt to modify the risk … it would alleviate one of the significant concerns I have with the proposal,” Mr Violi said.

>>18880143 OPINION: Now is a good time for the Yes campaign to panic - "When polling commissioned by this masthead showed that support for the Voice had slipped by five points down to just 53 per cent, powerful people on the Yes side decreed that the poll was a “bit of an outlier”. Any campaigner can tell you that polls sometimes bounce around. But minimising the trend, which the most recent track of polling continues, is foolish. The Voice referendum is on track to fail. Now is a good time for the Yes campaign to panic, before it’s too late to change the trajectory. Conservative Yes supporters are panicking strategically. They are on a mission to save the Voice. They believe that the current wording will fail at referendum and that changing it is the only way to save the Voice. They face a closing window of opportunity." - Parnell Palme McGuinness, Managing Director, Strategy and Policy at award-winning campaigns firm Agenda C. - theage.com.au

>>18885076 Greens and Pocock give Leeser hope of achieving a compromise on the Aboriginal voice - Liberal MP Julian Leeser is making a last-ditch attempt to get crossbench MPs and Indigenous leaders to support a compromise on the Indigenous voice, buoyed by the fact the Greens and independent senator David Pocock are yet to form a position on his plan to strip back the proposed new chapter to the constitution.

>>18885095 A watered down Indigenous voice to parliament would still be an affront to the ideal of constitutional equality, writes former prime minister Tony Abbott - "We don’t give a special voice to women, or to migrants, or to people with disabilities, even though the parliament sometimes passes laws that particularly refer to them, and even though they, too, have sometimes not had the fair go from our system that they deserve. Likewise, we can’t give a special voice to the First Australians without establishing a hierarchy of descent; or indeed, a pecking order among all the victims of history. Seeking an 11th-hour compromise will hardly allay people’s misgivings, just reinforce them, and confirm the Liberal Party was always right to say no." - Tony Abbott, 28th prime minister of Australia, 2013-15. - theaustralian.com.au

>>18885110 Parliament erupts over Dutton’s claim Voice will ‘re-racialise’ Australia - Bitter divisions over the Voice to parliament have descended into a feud over whether the proposal will unite or “re-racialise” Australia, with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton denouncing it as a regressive and radical threat to Australia’s democracy. But Voice architect Noel Pearson says a successful referendum will lead to “plurality, not apartheid” in Australia and that constitutional recognition will finally bring Indigenous Australians in from the margins of society.

>>18890046 Indigenous voice to parliament battlelines have been drawn and there is no nuance and very little goodwill on both sides of the debate - Anthony Albanese has gone “all in” on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government referendum and offered nothing, not a crumb of consolation, to those with genuine concerns seeking some compromise. The debate is set, the battlelines, drawn so long ago, are unchanged and there is a fateful air of a bruising and bitter debate to come.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919631

#29 - Part 37

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 13

>>18890054 A strong Indigenous voice to parliament is a sign of ‘healthy democracy’ - "There are people who disagree with the idea of the voice, and who will disagree with representations the voice might make. That is nothing to fear. A healthy democracy relies on the ability of people to be able to express their views, particularly on matters which affect them. The voice to parliament merely facilitates Indigenous Australians expressing their views on laws that affect them. It does not prevent others from expressing their views." - Professor Paula Gerber and Dr Katie O’Bryan, experts in human rights law at Monash University, specialists in Indigenous legal rights - theaustralian.com.au

>>18890059 Why I believe First Peoples will thrive with an Indigenous voice to parliament - "When Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have a say in the matters that affect our communities, we get better outcomes. We are but months away from the referendum for a voice. It is a pivotal moment. This referendum holds the promise of recognition and the potential of real practical change for communities. We must embrace this opportunity. The voice is our great next chapter, our hope for a better future." - Tom Calma, member of the referendum working group and co-author of the Calma-Langton report - theaustralian.com.au

>>18894995 Scott Morrison rejects ‘ill-defined, risky’ Indigenous voice to parliament with ‘no limits’ - Scott Morrison has denounced the Albanese government’s proposal for an Indigenous voice to parliament, warning it will have unconstrained and untested constitutional powers that will permanently create different rights for Australians based on race. In his first public comments outlining his position in detail, the former Liberal prime minister delivered a complete rejection of the government’s voice model, saying it created “significant” constitutional risk, had been poorly constructed and was ill-defined.

>>18895004 Leeser pleads for Coaliton voters to vote for Voice as Morrison criticises ‘ill-defined’ body - Liberal MP Julian Leeser has appealed to Australians to vote for the Voice to parliament, saying it will help transform remote Indigenous communities by tackling entrenched problems, as former prime minister Scott Morrison made a rare public intervention to urge a No vote. In a heartfelt speech that addressed Coalition voters specifically, Leeser - the Liberal Party’s leading Voice advocate, who quit Peter Dutton’s frontbench so he could campaign for a Yes vote – said the body would eliminate the economic and social differences between Indigenous and other Australians, rather than creating two classes of Australian, as Dutton and other No advocates claim.

>>18895012 A national Indigenous voice to parliament is the first step towards a better future as equals - "As a proud Nira illim bulluk man of the Taungurung Nation, I want to see the Yes vote get up, and I will campaign my hardest to make sure it has the best possible chance at the ballot box. A change in our lives requires a change in the existing systems that have continually failed us. We’ve heard a lot of promises in our time, most of which have turned out to be empty ones. But enshrining a voice in the Constitution guarantees we will always have a seat at the table. For those who want to see a fairer future, where our voices are valued and respected, I urge you to walk with us and vote Yes to the voice to parliament." - Marcus Stewart, member of the Referendum Working Group and co-chairman of the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria - theaustralian.com.au

>>18895018 Lidia Thorpe in senate estimates row with Indigenous minister Malarndirri McCarthy: ‘You’re a disgrace to your people’ - Indigenous Senator Lidia Thorpe has stormed out of senate estimates after a shouting match with Labor MP Malarndirri McCarthy, who told the Greens-turned-independent Senator: “You are a disgrace to your people”. Senator Thorpe and Senator McCarthy were yelling over each other during an exchange about $14.2m for community safety initiatives in the Northern Territory. After Senator Thorpe had established the money went to police, she shouted at Ms McCarthy: “How dare you”.

>>18900626 Video: Be on ‘right side of history’ on Voice, PM urges Australians - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has appealed to Australians to walk in the shoes of their Indigenous brothers and sisters as they weigh up how to vote in the Voice referendum as he accused Opposition Leader Peter Dutton of amplifying misinformation in his bid to sink the proposal. Speaking on the referendum bill in the House of Representatives, Albanese sought to dismantle the arguments of the Coalition and the No campaign while aiming to deliver a high-level pitch to Australians to be on the “right side of history”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919633

#29 - Part 38

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 14

>>18900636 Voice wording won’t change: Albanese - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed the current wording of the constitutional amendment to enshrine an Indigenous Voice to Parliament will not change. It comes as debate on the constitutional alteration bill continued in the nation's capital, with Mr Albanese imploring MPs to support the Indigenous Voice, suggesting it was a simple proposal that would provide meaningful action.

>>18900647 Anthony Albanese’s powerful speech doesn’t change the facts on the Indigenous voice to parliament - Anthony Albanese has formalised Labor’s position of not changing the wording of the referendum on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government and rejecting any suggested compromise from supporters of the Voice aimed at ensuring its success. The Prime Minister’s parliamentary speech on the referendum bill was explicit - there would be no change to the proposed wording and he sought to blame Peter Dutton and the Coalition for the intransigence.

>>18900665 Video: Peter Dutton: The Voice will 're-racialise our nation' - Peter Dutton has delivered a full-scale denunciation of the Voice proposal in parliament. His speech on the legislation to enable the Voice referendum went much further than many were expecting. The Liberal leader warned the "referendum on the Voice will undermine our equality of citizenship". He said it will "have an Orwellian effect where all Australians are equal, but some Australians are more equal than others." Dutton even suggested "the Voice will re-racialise our nation".

>>18900677 Opposition leader Peter Dutton is right to defend our history during the Indigenous voice to parliament debate - "Earlier this week Peter Dutton made his best speech so far as Opposition Leader. But it hardly received any attention. At the heart of Dutton’s speech was a plea to recognise that Australia was a historical success, made possible, at least in part, by a Constitution that should not lightly be changed. In his words, “nowhere else in the world is there a success story like ours, one of Indigenous heritage, of British inheritance and of migration and multicultural success - three threads woven together brilliantly and harmoniously”. Such success was “not something to be toyed with lightly”, he said, yet now we were being urged to change the nation’s rule book without a constitutional convention, with just a “4½-day committee, a kangaroo court” manipulated by a government that was always trying to steamroll the process because, as Dutton said, it “wants you to vote for the voice on a vibe”." - Peta Credlin - theaustralian.com.au

>>18900698 NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell scolds Justice Ian Harrison’s Indigenous voice to parliament email to Nationals MP Pat Conaghan - Nationals MP Pat Conaghan says he will not “walk back” from comments opposing the Indigenous voice to parliament that prompted NSW Supreme Court judge Ian Harrison to label his views “disgusting”, and says he is “proud” of his speech to the lower house this week. NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell scolded Justice Ian Harrison for sending a highly critical email to Mr Conaghan in which he described the federal MP’s opposition to the voice as racist. Chief Justice Bell issued a statement on Thursday criticising Justice Harrison’s behaviour, and urging judges to steer away from controversy.

>>18905818 Noel Pearson reveals he prays Australians ‘will support the Indigenous voice to parliament by a majority of voters in a majority of the states’ - "The boomer readership of this paper is of course antipathetic to recognition. They are mostly obscurant and borderline casual racists in their views. Just read the comments at the bottom of this piece. If the referendum relied on these readers then we would have no chance. But Australia is moving on. The change that is needed to secure recognition of Australia’s First Peoples is happening beyond that group of boomers who want this to be about the culture wars. The problem is that too many party activists and parliamentary candidates and members of the Liberal and National parties want to recreate America in Australia. The extreme polarisation of politics in the US is sought to be imported to this country. There are Australians who would like Trump and MAGA-style politics to become the politics of Australia." - Noel Pearson, director of Cape York Partnership and Good to Great Schools Australia - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919635

#29 - Part 39

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 15

>>18905833 Name-calling Noel Pearson misses the point about shifting support - "Last weekend, Noel Pearson added my name to his naughty list. My offence from his perspective has been to change sides on the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament and the executive. He wrote in this newspaper that I had become a “shrill” opponent “whose lurid denunciations of the voice proposal stand directly at odds with his previous support”. We are being asked to constitutionalise a race-based lobby group, paid for by taxpayers, that could involve itself not just in debates on Indigenous affairs, but in debates about all matters of public policy, all proposed laws and all administrative decisions. That extended scope means we are being asked to constitutionalise a system of racial preference. Equality of citizenship is fundamental to what it means to live in a democracy. We should never vote for its abolition." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18905902 ‘Secret weapon’ Noel Pearson’s vitriol only helps the ‘No’ campaign in the Indigenous voice to parliament debate - "When No voters say their evening prayers they must surely be throwing in a request to God to let Pearson go on Patricia Karvelas’s radio show the next morning to let rip at his enemies or, even better, his friends. No campaigners know that every piece of epic abuse Pearson showers on them is worth its weight in gold when it comes to campaign donations and voting intentions. Australians hate polysyllabic insults of any kind but particularly despise a walking encyclopaedia like Pearson dumping on an idealistic woman such as Jacinta Price or an amiable and well-intentioned one-time friend such as Mick Gooda." - Janet Albrechtsen, opinion columnist with The Australian - theaustralian.com.au

>>18905989 Video: Australia’s sport codes unite in support of Indigenous voice to parliament - Australia’s sport codes have united in an extraordinary show of support for the Indigenous voice to parliament, advocating for a nation that “values equity and fairness”. Twenty-one organisations, including all the major sports, have signed an open letter to Australians expressing support for the voice. The letter was followed on Friday morning with a historic gathering of sporting royalty at separate events in Sydney and Melbourne.

>>18911259 Peter Dutton says reconciliation ‘may be set back’ if referendum fails - Peter Dutton has conceded ­reconciliation may be set back if the referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government fails, but declares it will be the fault of Anthony Albanese who has “starved” Australians of detail. As the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader set out political battlelines for the Yes and No campaigns in speeches to parliament, Mr Dutton told The Weekend Australian he didn’t believe the country was ready for the voice and voters weren’t “going to be strongarmed into a position”.

>>18911295 Linda Burney hits back at Dutton’s claim Labor risking reconciliation with Indigenous voice referendum - The minister for Indigenous Australians, Linda Burney, has hit back at comments from Peter Dutton and accused the opposition leader of “playing politics” with the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum and dividing Australians. “This referendum will be determined by the Australian people, not politicians, and I have great faith in the Australian people,” Burney said.

>>18915092 Wesfarmers boss Michael Chaney says foreign investors will question if Australia’s a ‘fair place’ if voice referendum fails - Wesfarmers chairman Michael Chaney, a prominent supporter of the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, has warned international investors are watching the referendum closely and will question if Australia is a “fair place” if it fails. Mr Chaney said opposing the referendum would betray Wesfarmers’ Indigenous employees, customers and suppliers, as well as the Australian people. The business veteran, who has also led the boards of NAB and Woodside Energy, said chief executives of other big companies universally shared the same view.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919637

#29 - Part 40

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 1

>>18676828 Dozens of Australian politicians urge US to abandon Julian Assange extradition - Australian federal politicians from across the political spectrum have jointly asked the US attorney general, Merrick Garland, to abandon attempts to extradite Julian Assange from the UK. The 48 MPs and senators, including 13 from the governing Labor party, warned that the pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder “set a dangerous precedent” for press freedom and would damage the reputation of the US.

>>18676832 UK MPs implore US Attorney-General to drop Assange extradition - A letter to the US attorney-general has been signed by 35 British parliamentarians calling for extradition proceedings to be dropped against Julian Assange, on the fourth anniversary of his detention at Belmarsh prison. Richard Burgon, Labour MP for Leeds East, organised the letter, which has been given the support of MPs and members of the House of Lords from six parties.

>>18708618 Assange imprisonment has gone on for too long: Wong - Foreign Minister Penny Wong has called for the extradition case against Julian Assange to come to an end. Senator Wong said the legal case and imprisonment of the WikiLeaks co-founder has been going on for too long. Australian high commissioner to the UK Stephen Smith visited Mr Assange in Belmarsh Prison earlier in April, the first time an Australian official had visited him in the facility since his arrest. The foreign minister said it would be good to continue consular assistance to the Australian while he remained in prison.

>>18729066 WikiLeaks Tweet: Imprisoned WikiLeaks publisher and journalist Julian Assange's father and brother meet with the President of Mexico who reaffirms his support for the publishers' immediate release following renewed calls by parliamentarians worldwide

>>18729066 Andrés Manuel @lopezobrador_ Tweet: (Google Translation:) I received John and Gabriel Shipton, father and brother, respectively, of Julian Assange, whom we will continue to defend, since he is a political prisoner and his case is an unacceptable insult to freedom of expression.

>>18800673 Australia PM says 'frustrated' over continued detention of Julian Assange - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday he was frustrated for not yet finding a diplomatic fix over the continued detention of Julian Assange and that he remained concerned about the mental health of the WikiLeaks' founder. "I know it's frustrating, I share the frustration," Albanese told ABC television from London where Assange is being held pending a U.S. extradition case. "I can't do more than make very clear what my position is and the U.S. administration is certainly very aware of what the Australian government's position is. There is nothing to be served by his ongoing incarceration."

>>18800699 Assange backers buoyed as PM says 'enough is enough' - Bipartisan backing for the release of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has buoyed supporters' hopes the Australian's prison stint will end, as the prime minister declares "enough is enough". In his strongest comments on the case since his election win, Anthony Albanese said there was no benefit to the 51-year-old's ongoing detention in the UK. His position was backed by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who said he was concerned for the Australian's fate and the case had gone on for too long.

>>18800731 ‘It’s incredible’: Julian Assange supporters thrilled by Dutton remarks - Supporters of Julian Assange feel buoyed by the emergence of bipartisan support for the case against the WikiLeaks founder to be brought to a close after a significant change in rhetoric from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Friday expressed frustration with his government’s inability to convince the Biden administration to drop its extradition request for Assange, saying he had left United States officials with no doubt about his position on the matter. Dutton - who had previously been highly critical of Assange – said on Friday that Assange’s case had gone on for too long and should be brought to a conclusion.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919640

#29 - Part 41

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 2

>>18819512 Caroline Kennedy meets Assange supporters, fuelling breakthrough hopes - A cross-party delegation of Australian politicians has met United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy to increase the pressure on the Biden administration to drop its pursuit of Julian Assange and warn the WikiLeaks founder’s ongoing incarceration risks undermining the US-Australia alliance. Assange’s supporters feel heartened by Kennedy’s decision to hold the meeting and are cautiously optimistic that momentum is building for a breakthrough on Assange’s case as he continues to languish in London’s high-security Belmarsh Prison. The highly sought-after meeting comes at a pivotal moment, just a fortnight before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hosts Joe Biden for his first presidential visit to Australia, and days after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton significantly shifted his rhetoric on Assange’s case.

>>18829484 WikiLeaks Tweet: Video: Australian Prime Minister reiterates calls for release of journalist/publisher Julian Assange: "A solution needs to be found that brings this matter to a conclusion…nothing is served from the further incarceration of Mr. Assange" @abc730 #FreeAssangeNOW

>>18860685 Video: Julian Assange’s father speaks on his battle to free his son - For supporters of Julian Assange, the planned visit next week by President Biden is an opportunity to focus attention on Assange's continued imprisonment in the UK and potential extradition to the US. John Shipton is Julian Assange's father, and he speaks to Sarah Ferguson about his fight to free his son - 7.30 / ABC News In-depth

>>18885050 ‘We are considering all options’: Assange supporters open to a plea deal with US - Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange are open to a plea deal with United States authorities that might clear the way for his release from a British prison, with his wife declaring his freedom had to be the priority. Urging the Australian government to press the case for his release, Stella Assange said her husband was being detained for revealing the truth and must never be extradited to face charges in the US.

>>18885057 Video: IN FULL: Stella Assange, Jennifer Robinson address National Press Club on Julian Assange - Stella Assange was part of Julian Assange's legal team since his confinement in the Ecuadorian embassy and they got Married in 2022. Jennifer Robinson has been advising Julian Assange and Wikileaks since 2010. Julian Assange has been confined in Belmarsh prison since April 2019. - ABC News (Australia)

>>18885064 Video: Prime Minister dodges Stella Assange meeting - “Prime Minister you would be aware that Stella Assange is in Parliament House, and in fact is in the gallery right now. Prime Minister why are you not meeting with Stella today? Will you meet with Stella tomorrow? And why won’t you do more to see Julian Assange reunited with Stella and their young sons Gabriel and Max?” - Andrew Wilkie MP, May 22, 2023

#29 - Part 42

Cardinal George Pell - Sexual Abuse and Vatican Financial Scandal Allegations

>>18682194, >>18682198 Cardinal George Pell: A Reminiscence - "Since his unexpected death on 10 January 2023 in Rome, there have been many words written about Cardinal George Pell. Some of those assessments have been very positive and attested to his extraordinary input into the Church in Australia and internationally, and others have been highly critical and, in some instances, quite derogatory. There is little doubt that Cardinal Pell could be a polarising figure and anecdotally you either fell in the camp of being “for” or “against.” My intention here is not to add to the body of opinion, which is now accumulating at a prodigious rate, but rather to reflect on my own encounters with Cardinal Pell given that I worked closely with him during the preparations and the execution of World Youth Day in Sydney in 2008." - Very Rev Peter G. Williams AM - catholicoutlook.org

>>18855396 Cardinal Pell Showed Us What Interior Freedom Really Looks Like - "Cardinal Pell is a man who remained sane despite the insanity of being imprisoned on false, horrific charges. He is a model for our times and a man to remember always in our prayers." - Maryella Hierholzer - ncregister.com

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919641

#29 - Part 43

Australia / China Tensions - Part 1

>>18676766 Video: Federal government says agreement reached with China to resolve barley dispute - The federal government has agreed to suspend its appeal to the World Trade Organization over Chinese government tariffs on Australian barley just before the international body was due to hand down a finding over the dispute. Foreign Minister Penny Wong announced that China had promised to conduct an "expedited review" of the tariffs over the next three months and that, in return, Australia would "temporarily suspend" its WTO action over the same period.

>>18676772 Chinese Vice FM to visit Australia, Fiji amid signs of warming ties - Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu will visit Australia and Fiji this week at their invitation, the Chinese foreign ministry confirmed at a regular press briefing on Monday, saying Ma will hold the new round of political consultation between the officials of the foreign ministries of China and Australia. Experts said Ma's visit to Australia, following talks between the two countries' foreign, defense and commerce ministries, showed that China and Australia are resuming communication channels in different areas and levels. - Zhang Changyue - globaltimes.cn

>>18676779 China’s military strategy in the Pacific and how Australia can avoid being beaten - China is playing a 2500-year-old strategy board game to win over the region and Australia needs more than just submarines and missiles to play, one of our top security analysts has warned. Australian National University professor of international security and intelligence and defence studies Professor John Blaxland said Australia’s secret weapon was in greater regional engagement as much as new military hardware.

>>18682151 Video: Go inside one of the most powerful warships in the world - CNN's Will Ripley reports exclusively from one of the most powerful warships on the planet, the USS Mississippi, a U.S. nuclear submarine that's on high alert for threats from China.

>>18693611 Video: NSW man charged with selling Australian defence secrets to two foreign spies - A man has been charged with selling Australian defence, economic and national security secrets to two foreign spies working for the People’s Republic of China. Alexander Csergo, 55, was arrested by Australian Federal Police at Bondi in Sydney’s eastern suburbs late on Friday and charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, a charge that carries a 15-year jail term.

>>18708561 Call for audit as Chinese DJI drones join Australian Defence Force war games - The Australian Defence Force is using Chinese drones from a company black-listed by the US, prompting calls for a government-wide policy on the use of technology from high-risk suppliers. Hundreds of drones from Chinese company DJI are in use across the ADF, mainly for training, and some will be used in a three-week military exercise off the Queensland coast in coming weeks.

>>18708573 Bondi man sold info on AUKUS and lithium mining to alleged Chinese spies, court hears - Bondi businessman Alexander Csergo sold information about the AUKUS agreement, lithium mining and iron ore to alleged Chinese spies, a court has heard, as he is denied bail and his actions are deemed “highly suspicious”. Mr Csergo fronted the Downing Centre District Court on Monday for a bail hearing via video link, after he was arrested by the AFP on Friday and charged with one count of reckless foreign interference. While Mr Csergo‘s defence lawyer said his actions were “nothing sinister”, Magistrate Michael Barko said his decision to meet with alleged spies, using the anglicised names Ken and Evelyn, in cafes in Shanghai was “highly suspicious”.

>>18714036 China ‘a danger’ to accused AUKUS information seller Alexander Csergo - The Bondi businessman alleged to have sold AUKUS information to Chinese spies could be in danger from “people very interested in him not giving evidence against the Republic of China”, according to a magistrate who ruled that keeping him detained would help ensure his safety. Alexander Csergo was denied bail on the grounds he was a flight risk after a court heard he sold information about the AUKUS security agreement, lithium mining and iron ore to alleged Chinese agents in exchange for envelopes of cash.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919643

#29 - Part 44

Australia / China Tensions - Part 2

>>18714044 Video: 2 NY residents allegedly ran secret Chinese police station: 'Significant national security matter' - The FBI and federal prosecutors announced Monday the arrests of two New York residents who allegedly ran an undisclosed Chinese government police station in Manhattan's Chinatown neighborhood. Lu Jianwang and Chen Jinping have each been charged with conspiring to act as agents of China's government, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York.

>>18714060 Video: Confusion as ‘Chinese police’ car spotted on street in Melbourne’s southeast - A car modified to look like a Chinese police vehicle has been spotted on a road in Melbourne’s southeast. A photo of a grey Nissan with Chinese characters on its bonnet and side reading “police” and “special police” appeared on Reddit on Sunday. The car also featured a purple shield logo used on official police cars in China. The user who posted the photo said they had reported the car to local police, who indicated they had received five calls in 90 minutes about the same vehicle. The poster also said the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation had contacted them about the location of the vehicle.

>>18719406 Chinese-Australians ‘more wary of AUKUS’, Lowy survey finds - Chinese-Australians are significantly less supportive of the AUKUS alliance and the prospect of Australian military involvement in a US war against China than the broader Australian population, a new survey suggests. The Lowy Institute’s Being Chinese in Australia Poll also reveals a big jump in the proportion of Chinese-Australians expressing concern at “foreign interference” by the US in Australia’s political processes, from 36 per cent in 2021 to 62 per cent in the latest survey. They are less concerned about foreign interference by Beijing, with 54 per cent identifying it a problem compared with 50 per cent in 2021. The poll shows Chinese-Australians have much more confidence in Anthony Albanese (60 per cent) than they did his ­predecessor Scott Morrison (49 per cent), reflecting the Labor Prime Minister’s efforts to dial-down the friction between Canberra and Beijing.

>>18719425 Video: Live mic picks up WA premier badmouthing shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie at Beijing lunch - On day one of a historic Chinese trade mission, West Australian Premier Mark McGowan has unwittingly reignited a feud with shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie after a microphone picked up his disparaging comments made about Hastie’s views on China. “The other Western Australian who was senior, well, there was a few of them actually - Hastie. He swallowed some sort of Cold War pills back … when he was born, and he couldn’t get his mindset out of that.” Mr. Hastie criticised the premier for inserting himself in foreign policy debates and said he wished he would focus on domestic issues like fixing the Peel Health Campus in Hastie’s WA Canning electorate rather than trying to do Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s job.

>>18719485 Video: TikTok ban backlash: China thinks it’s foolish - Anyone who cares to search will undoubtedly find some very amusing TikTok videos made about the very uproar TikTok has been causing lately. Last week it was banned from Australian government phones and devices. It’s deemed to be a risk to our national security because of the Chinese ownership of its parent company. The decision has upset the local arm of TikTok who maintain their app is harmless fun, not a spy tool. As Amelia Adams reports, it has also outraged the Chinese Communist Party, which is once again warning us not to treat Beijing as the enemy. - 60 Minutes Australia

>>18723436 Mark McGowan’s China trade mission: WA Premier calls for National Cabinet to be held in Beijing - Premier Mark McGowan has called for National Cabinet to be held in China in an unprecedented pitch to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese aimed at rebuilding relations between the two nations. The bold proposal to host all State and Territory leaders came on the second day of the Premier’s five-day trade mission in Beijing. “The Prime Minister, hopefully, will come to China sometime in the next six months and meet with President Xi Jinping,” Mr McGowan said. “One of the things he could do is, invite all the Premiers and Chief Ministers to come with him.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919644

>>18919643

#29 - Part 45

Australia / China Tensions - Part 3

>>18723446 Calls for decoupling 'now in the past,' Western Australian Premier says, as Australia seeks to boost trade ties with China - Premiers of Australian states have been visiting China in droves amid thawing bilateral relations, eyeing to further deepen trade and economic cooperation with its largest trading partner, while the ongoing visit of Western Australian Premier Mark McGowan being the latest representation despite some voices hyping about "decoupling." In an interview with the Global Times on Wednesday, McGowan highlighted a strong and beneficial bilateral relationship, stressing the calls for "decoupling" "are now in the past" and now there is "an appetite for a better relationship with China" after the new federal government took office. - Xiong Xinyi, Yu Jincui, and Xing Xiaojing - globaltimes.cn

>>18723453 In New Caledonia, Australia urges Pacific island unity amid China, U.S. competition - Australia's foreign minister urged Pacific island countries on Thursday to stay united in the face of great power competition as she visited New Caledonia, where the president raised concerns about Australia's AUKUS nuclear submarine programme. Foreign Minister Penny Wong's visit to the French territory coincides with a push by a China-backed group for several Pacific island nations, including New Caledonia, to sign a splinter security pact.

>>18729148 ‘The king of WA’: McGowan moves closer to Beijing - Between glasses of Australian wine under golden chandeliers at the China World Summit Wing in downtown Beijing, captains of industry, embassy officials and mining moguls gathered to hear West Australian Premier Mark McGowan speak. “The King of WA,” his Chinese hosts reportedly called him this week. McGowan had returned to Beijing after four years of COVID-induced absence, $20 billion in trade strikes and years of division between Perth and the former Coalition government in Canberra on China policy. In the Chinese capital, he predicted the relationship between Australia and China would become “a harmonious and productive one” and announced China’s version of Davos would be heading to Perth this year as WA’s annual exports to China hit a record $146 billion. “Perhaps above any other state in Australia, Western Australia understands the importance of the relationship with China,” he said on Tuesday.

>>18729172 Lawyers for ‘Top Gun’ pilot write to US ambassador asking to halt extradition - Lawyers for former US military pilot Daniel Duggan have written to the US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy and her Australian counterpart Kevin Rudd urging for the extradition of the father-of-six to be withdrawn. Duggan, 54, an Australian citizen, has been in custody since October accused of training Chinese military pilots in South Africa in 2012 without seeking permission from the US Department of Justice – an allegation he denies.

>>18734375 McGowan ‘has lost respect’ after gaffe-marred China visit - WA Premier Mark McGowan’s gaffe-marred visit to China may have hurt his standing not just at home but also in Beijing. While Mr McGowan’s visit was designed to help restore relations that had been strained in recent years, Kevin Carrico - a senior lecturer in Chinese studies at Monash University - said it may have actually diminished his standing in the eyes of Beijing. “Leaders in Beijing will be laughing at his gullibility because what he’s showing is a willingness to essentially do anything to please Beijing,” he said. “In one sense, of course, that makes Beijing happy. In another sense, there’s no chance of the leaders in Beijing respecting him.”

>>18734455 ‘No sense of safety’: Australian citizens reveal extraordinary lengths Chinese Communist Party will go to silence dissent - Two Australian citizens have detailed the extraordinary lengths the Chinese government will go to silence foreign dissidents and the harrowing experiences of those subject to the intimidation and harassment campaigns. An Australian parliamentary committee has heard about the harrowing experiences of two Chinese-Australians subject to extraordinary harassment campaigns by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Journalist Vicky Xu and artist Badiucao spoke to the senate committee on foreign interference through social media, detailing the CCP lengths the Chinese government will go to silence foreign dissidents. Ms Xu, a journalist and senior fellow at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), said the Chinese government had been trying to “to silence, intimidate and harass” for her entire six to seven year career. Like Ms Xu, Badiucao said he had also been subject to a smear campaign, detailing multiple attempts to create fake versions of his website with slightly different domain names.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919646

#29 - Part 46

Australia / China Tensions - Part 4

>>18739389 Video: Conflict over Taiwan isn’t ‘inevitable’, Defence Minister Richard Marles says - Defence Minister Richard Marles says he doesn’t think a war over Taiwan is “inevitable” as he continues to defend Australia’s multi-billion dollar nuclear submarine plans. Speaking on the eve of the release of a landmark review of Australia’s military capability, Mr Marles said the government remained optimistic a China-Taiwan conflict could be avoided. “I have a sense of optimism. But having said that, we live in a very complex and difficult world. And we need to be alive to that,” he said.

>>18744386 Defence Strategic Review calls for a more lethal military to handle China expansion - The Australian Defence Force will be transformed into a more agile, lethal force, capable of mounting missile strikes and amphibious ­assaults far from the mainland under an ambitious blueprint to respond to China’s unprecedented military expansion. The government’s Defence Strategic Review, released on Monday, warns Australia’s strategic circumstances have “radically” worsened, to the point that “we now face as a nation the prospect of major conflict in the region that directly threatens our national ­interest”.

>>18744438 Defence Strategic Review: Beijing accuses Canberra of hyping ‘China threat arguments’ to increase military budget - Beijing has accused Australia of hyping “Chinese threat arguments” as an “excuse” to expand its military power. In the first response to the Albanese government’s Defence Strategic Review, Beijing said China had always pursued a purely “defensive” national defence policy. “We are committed to maintaining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific and the world, and do not pose a threat to any country,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said.

>>18744498 Video: WA Premier Mark McGowan raised cases of detained Australians during China trip - Western Australia Premier Mark McGowan said he raised the cases of two detained Australians while he was on a five-day trip in China. Journalist Cheng Lei has been detained in China since August 2020 and is accused of leaking state secrets, while writer Yang Hengjun was arrested in January 2019 and the case against him has never been publicly disclosed.

>>18749483 Defence Strategic Review: Neighbours tipped to support new posture - As Australia prepares to broaden out its defence posture from a focus on protecting our own borders to one that contributes to regional security and a balance of power, a key question to ask is; Will our neighbours welcome this development? The review, which explicitly names China’s claims over the South China Sea as the biggest threat to Australia and its neighbourhood, will inevitably touch some nerves in a region already highly attuned to any activity that could further inflame tensions.

>>18749519 NT prepares for increase in military spending, US Marines after Defence Strategic Review - The Northern Territory is poised to play a key role in Australia's future missile defences, according to NT Chief Minister Natasha Fyles, as the region prepares for an influx of soldiers and defence force spending. A major defence force review released on Monday by the Albanese government, touted the need for immediate upgrades and developments to bases across northern Australia. The Defence Strategic Review pinpointed a "network of bases, ports and barracks stretching in Australian territory from Cocos (Keeling) Islands in the north-west, through RAAF bases Learmonth, Curtin, Darwin, Tindal, Scherger and Townsville" for urgent and comprehensive upgrades.

>>18755020 Time running out to prevent war over Taiwan, Japanese ambassador warns - Time is running out for Australia and other democracies to deter China from launching an invasion of Taiwan, Japan’s departing ambassador to Australia has warned. Shingo Yamagami, whose Canberra posting ends this weekend after almost 2½ years, accused his Chinese counterpart of launching a character assassination against him and rejected suggestions in the diplomatic community he had been called back to Tokyo early because of his outspoken style. Describing a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan as an increasing concern, Yamagami said: “My point is: time is running out. Time is quite limited because our response has been slow. So rather than letting our counterpart think they see a window of opportunity to resort to military action, we have to do our best to narrow or even close that window of opportunity.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919647

#29 - Part 47

Australia / China Tensions - Part 5

>>18766087 Challenge to AFP raid over Chinese pilot training fails - A former fighter pilot suspected of helping train Chinese People's Liberation Army pilots has failed in a court challenge to the validity of an Australian Federal Police raid on his home. The AFP executed a search warrant and seized items from the home of Keith Hartley, chief operating officer of the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), in November. The warrant said Hartley was suspected of breaking commonwealth law by organising and facilitating training to PLA pilots "in regard to military aircraft platforms and military doctrine, tactics and strategy". In a judgment delivered in Sydney on Friday (April 28, 2023), Justice Wendy Abraham said Mr Hartley had not established the warrant was invalid. The sole ground of the invalidity claim was the allegation that the warrant did not sufficiently state an offence. "It states conduct capable of constituting an offence, and it does so with a reasonable degree of precision," she said, in dismissing his application.

>>18766108 Daniel Duggan’s family protest outside US embassy in Canberra - The wife of imprisoned Australian Daniel Duggan, the former US marine pilot wanted for extradition by America, has led a protest outside the US embassy in Canberra demanding her husband be released and his extradition abandoned. Saffrine Duggan told protesters on Friday morning: "I am determined to fight this terrible injustice, and to demand that Australian sovereignty is respected. Today Dan has been gone for 191 days - without any Australian charges, convictions, or history of violence – on the say-so of the United States government."

>>18766129 Daniel Duggan’s case to return to court on Monday, 1 May 2023 - Lawyers have argued the request for Daniel Duggan’s extradition is politically motivated - catalysed by the US’s deepening geopolitical contest with China, and invalid under Australia’s extradition treaty with the US. The US alleges Duggan, a former US citizen now a naturalised Australian, trained Chinese fighter pilots to land fighter jets on aircraft carriers, in defiance of arms trafficking laws, and engaged in a conspiracy to launder money. Those claims have not been tested in court.

>>18770941 ‘I’m not a bot’: Melbourne scholar behind pro-Beijing Twitter account plans to ‘debunk’ Xinjiang claims. To many online, Maureen A Huebel almost doesn’t seem like a real person. The vociferously anti-American Twitter account posts a constant stream of pro-China - and more recently, pro-Russia - messages to her 3000 followers, with an unusual focus on debunking claims of Uyghur repression in Xinjiang. In one viral tweet that sparked particular backlash, Mrs Huebel - whose bio lists a series of academic qualifications from universities including Monash - claimed she was planning to travel to the troubled northwestern region to study the “happiness” of the local population.

>>18770981 Chinese academic centers welcome Australian scholar who has come under attack after announcing plans to visit Xinjiang - Two academic centers in China on Friday expressed a warm welcome to Maureen A Huebel, an Australian scholar, who has been under attack from anti-China forces after announcing her plan to visit China's Xinjiang region in 2024, saying they are willing to work with the Australian scholar and assist her in conducting research in the region. - Liu Xin - globaltimes.cn

>>18770996 Attacks won't scare me off from Xinjiang research: Australian scholar - Maureen Huebel, a Melbourne-based scholar who has been the target of online harassment for debunking Western mainstream narratives about the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, said she would not back down in her research. "The more opposition I got, the more determined I became to complete my project," Huebel said in article published on Global Times. One post that has sparked particular backlash was published on March 4. "I am travelling to Xinjiang in 2024 to study how the Uygurs have contributed to the substantial growth in the Xinjiang GDP and look at their population growth," she wrote, adding "Analyse their happiness and expression through dancing." Since announcing her plans, Huebel had been hounded by trolls, with some even sending her death threats. Some accused her of being a "sophisticated Chinese bot". - Ma Chi - chinadaily.com.cn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919648

#29 - Part 48

Australia / China Tensions - Part 6

>>18771047 Melbourne scholar smeared as 'bot' as she tries to debunk false Xinjiang claims - A Melbourne scholar was accused of being an elaborate fake account after she posted a series of pro-China messages to her over 3,000 followers. Some of her posts are focused on debunking claims of the "Xinjiang Uygur genocide," a false narrative that has been repeated by Western politicians and media outlets for years out of political reasons. She believes that her Twitter suffering is an example of the result of growing U.S. fears as China's growth trajectory is set to overtake the American economy in a few years and Australia is experiencing pressure from the U.S. in every aspect of their lives. She said that the major challenge of the Australian government is striking a balance between what the U.S. wants Australia to do and what Australia wants to do. She suggested that Australia should stop acting like a U.S. follower and become an "adult" acting in its own interests. "China is not a threat, but an opportunity," Huebel said. "We should get involved in cooperation with China." - CGTN - chinadaily.com.cn

>>18771116 Malicious attacks can't stop my research about Xinjiang - "I joined Twitter to do preliminary research, but I did not expect the outrage that I would receive from Western people. A backlash blew up even before I started the project. The West is convinced that China is bad, so I couldn't be a critical thinker and say anything good about China, despite the fact that I am an established scholar in Australia and Britain with many published papers. Australia experiences pressure from the US in every aspect of our lives. At this point in history, the US is seriously threatened by the amazing economic growth of China. China's growth trajectory is set to overtake the US economy in a few years. American hegemony, with its international power and control, is now weakening." - Maureen Huebel - globaltimes.cn

>>18779820 Alleged illegal conduct by ASIO could stymie extradition of Daniel Duggan to US on charges of arms trafficking - Alleged illegal conduct by Australia’s spy agency could halt a US effort to extradite a former fighter pilot accused of training Chinese military aviators. Lawyers for Daniel Edmund Duggan, 54, will argue to temporarily stay a request from the US to extradite him to America while Australia’s Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) conducts a formal investigation into the conduct of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) agents in regards to Duggan’s case. Duggan will spend at least another 86 days in prison before his case comes back to court in July. He has already been incarcerated, much of it in isolation, for 191 days.

>>18784903 Australian police searched pilot's home for China fighter jet records - Australian police searched the home of a British former test pilot for documents related to China's J-16 strike fighter, Australia's intelligence partners, and China's biggest aviation company, a court judgment shows. The search in November was part of an investigation into Western military pilots training China's military at a time of growing tension between China and the United States and its allies. Keith Hartley, chief operating officer of the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), has not been charged. Federal police searched Hartley's home on suspicion he had broken the law by providing military style training directed or funded by China between 2018 and 2022.

>>18794926 Banning WeChat would ‘damage’ democracy, experts say - Banning WeChat in Australia risks causing “emotional, psychological and practical harm” to the country’s large Chinese-speaking community, experts have told a Senate inquiry. Dr Wanning Sun, from the University of Technology Sydney, and Dr Haiqing Yu, from RMIT, on Thursday made a late submission to the inquiry in which they argued banning the Chinese social media app would cause more harm than good. WeChat, they say, is essential for communication between Chinese Australians and their families, friends, and business partners in China given other social media apps including WhatsApp and Facebook are banned. The platform was even used, in some cases, to farewell dying relatives while China’s borders were closed during the pandemic. “WeChat is a necessity, not a choice for many Chinese Australians,” Dr Sun and Dr Yu said. Seth Kaplan, a lecturer at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, last month told the inquiry into foreign interference through social media he would support banning WeChat, which he described as a “narrative machine for the CCP” that is “worse than TikTok”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919649

#29 - Part 49

Australia / China Tensions - Part 7

>>18800562 Rishi Sunak says China is Britain’s greatest threat to economic security - China is the single greatest threat to Britain’s economic security, according to British Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak. In an exclusive interview in his Downing Street office, Mr Sunak also hailed the AUKUS agreement with Australia, the US and the UK as “the most significant multilateral defence partnership in generations”. In comments on China that are stronger than any others he has made since becoming Prime Minister, Mr Sunak characterised China’s behaviour as “increasingly authoritarian at home and assertive abroad”.

>>18800625 China challenge ‘epoch-defining’, Rishi Sunak warns as Xi Jinping vows PLA ‘wall of steel’ - Xi Jinping has declared China will build the People’s Liberation Army into a “great wall of steel” to protect the rising giant’s “national sovereignty” on the eve of ­Anthony Albanese, Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak unveiling their monumental AUKUS submarine deal. British Prime Minister, Mr Sunak, warned China posed an “epoch-defining systemic challenge” as he headed to San Diego in the US to meet Mr Albanese and Mr Biden to lay out their AUKUS plans to deter an increasingly assertive Beijing.

>>18800905 Inside the US Marine Corps training mission in Australia - The US Marines are helping the Australian Army sharpen its amphibious warfighting capability during a six-month mission down under that is preparing both countries to respond to Chinese military aggression. The Army’s 1st Brigade, based in Darwin, is tapping into the expertise of up to 2500 Marines as the unit is redesigned to specialise in littoral combat in coastal areas that will be crucial in any Indo-Pacific conflict.

>>18810246 ‘Missing her kids’: Aussie journalist Cheng Lei reaches 1000 days in Chinese jail - For almost 1000 days Australian journalist Cheng Lei has woken up inside a Chinese cell, cut off from her two young children in Melbourne and her friends in Beijing. Each day she wakes up still unaware of the crime she is alleged to have committed, in a country that she had devoted her professional life to, that now only gives her two hours a day of fresh air. “The 1000 days [milestone] is going to be really tough for her,” said Cheng’s partner Nick Coyle. “She misses her children enormously.”

>>18814604 Australia accused of undermining Fiji-China relationship, amid uncertainty over police agreement - China has accused Australia of trying to sabotage its relationship with Fiji as questions swirl over whether the Pacific Island country will cut security and law enforcement ties with Beijing. The relationship between Beijing and Suva has cooled ever since Sitiveni Rabuka won power late last year, particularly after the new prime minister reversed a decision forcing Taiwan to downgrade the official title of its diplomatic mission in Fiji. Mr Rabuka has also repeatedly said that he will scrap a 2011 police cooperation agreement which Fiji signed with China under former prime minister Frank Bainimarama, saying he wanted to limit law enforcement ties to countries with "similar systems." Late last week the Chinese embassy in Fiji issued its sharpest statement yet on the issue, saying it hoped "relevant parties" would "abandon ideological prejudice, and view the law enforcement and police cooperation between China and Fiji objectively and rationally".

>>18814613 Australian Border Force called to suspend Chinese DJI drones in-line with ADF - A Chinese-made drone grounded by Defence and black-listed by the US military is still being used by the Australian Border Force sparking fears the high-risk technology could compromise the agency’s “sensitive” operations. The Coalition is calling for the ABF to follow the Australian Defence Force in suspending the use of drones and other products manufactured by controversial Chinese company Da Jiang Innovations (DJI) pending a security audit.

>>18819524 Exclusive: China-Australia economic and trade relations are facing an important window period: Chinese Ambassador - China-Australia economic and trade relations are facing an important window period. The two sides have important consensus on jointly maintaining the positive momentum of bilateral relations, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian told the Global Times in a written interview. The recent resumption of exchanges and cooperation between China and Australia in various fields fully demonstrates that despite some differences, the two sides have a strong desire for communication and exchanges and share broad and profound common interests. This year is crucial for the steady and sound development of China-Australia relations, said Xiao. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919650

#29 - Part 50

Australia / China Tensions - Part 8

>>18829502 Death of Manasseh Sogavare’s right hand man threatens to destabilise Solomon Islands - Solomon Islands’ Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s nephew and political fixer has died of a heart attack in a development that could destabilise the Pacific’s most pro-China government. Multiple Solomon Islands’ sources said Robson Djokovic, Mr Sogavare’s longtime chief of staff, died of a heart attack on Wednesday. A local political source said Mr Djokovic provided the backroom strength underpinning Mr Sogavare’s hold on power.

>>18829502 Untimely Passing of Government’s Chief of Staff Shocks Many - The untimely passing of the government’s chief of staff, Robson Djokovic, has shocked many, particularly within government circles, where he has been a long-time confidant and trusted advisor of Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare. Multiple sources say that Mr. Djokovic died of a suspected heart attack. Mr. Djokovic has been a key figure in Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s government, often seen as a formidable operative during the lobbying period.

>>18835358 Trade Minister Don Farrell given surprise Forbidden City tour, China's foreign minister to visit Australia - Trade Minister Don Farrell has been given a surprise tour of Beijing's Forbidden City by a senior Chinese Commerce Ministry official, in an encouraging sign ahead of talks later on Friday with his counterpart, Wang Wentao. Senator Farrell was hosted on the tour by the ministry's deputy director-general, Peng Wei. The unexpected invitation came about 4 hours ahead of Senator Farrell's scheduled sit-down meeting with Mr Wang. As he entered the Forbidden City, Senator Farrell said he was "very privileged to be invited here to this iconic site".

>>18835386 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on May 11, 2023 - "China and Australia are both important countries in the Asia-Pacific with highly complementary economies and mutually beneficial business ties. To improve and maintain the sound growth of bilateral ties serves the fundamental interests of both countries and peoples."

>>18835396 China trip: Don Farrell firm on national security - Trade Minister Don Farrell will push back on Chinese calls for Australia to relax its foreign investment rules, declaring ahead of high-level talks in Beijing that the Albanese government reserves its right to block stakes in critical companies on national security grounds. Senator Farrell, who will meet Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao on Friday, said he felt “the weight of responsibility on my shoulders” to negotiate an end to Chinese trade bans on Australian companies.

>>18835410 Australian trade minister visits China to seek cooperation as ties face ‘important window’ - Despite Australia's keenness to boost trade with China, more concerted efforts are needed to further improve ties, analysts noted. China's core concerns must be respected and addressed by the Australian side, in order to further promote bilateral cooperation, Chinese officials and analysts said. "It is hoped that the Australian side will earnestly abide by the one-China principle, an important prerequisite and political basis for improving, upholding, and further developing China-Australia relations, and earnestly respect each other's core interests and major concerns," Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said. - Wang Cong, Yin Yeping and Song Lin - globaltimes.cn

>>18835427 GT Voice: Finding pragmatic balance key for Australia to recover China trade - Despite the increasing positive signs for the thawing of China-Australia economic and trade relations, whether bilateral trade is really heading toward "a warm spring" is still up to whether Canberra can find a pragmatic point in balancing its economic and political imperatives. The further improvement of bilateral relations requires Australia's realization that China is Australia's partner and did not and will not pose a security threat to Australia. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18840338 China trip: Don Farrell returns without trade concessions, touts ‘positive momentum’ - Trade Minister Don Farrell is returning from a two-day trip to China without concessions from Beijing on a raft of trade bans against Australian exports, but says there is “positive momentum” in the countries’ relationship. Senator Farrell said he and Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao agreed during high-level talks on Friday night to “step up dialogue” to resolve the trade issues. He said Mr Wang had agreed to visit him in South Australia to build on their discussions.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919652

#29 - Part 51

Australia / China Tensions - Part 9

>>18840352 Resumption of high-level economic talks sends encouraging signs on thaw of China-Australia relations - Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell's visit to Beijing witnessed multiple encouraging signs in the stabilized recovery of China-Australia cooperation, including the resumption of a landmark high-level economic meeting and the minister's tour of Beijing's iconic Forbidden City. But Canberra needs to understand that actions that harm China's core interests and provoke China's red lines could undermine the improvement of bilateral relations. It is crucial for Australia to have the political wisdom and strategic confidence to cherish the hard-won recovery of China-Australia ties, instead of pursuing the strategic interests of the US at the expense of its own interests. - Wang Jiamei - globaltimes.cn

>>18840385 Fired TikTok exec says Chinese government had access to app user data - A former executive fired from TikTok’s parent company ByteDance made a raft of accusations against the tech giant, including that it stole content from competitors like Instagram and Snapchat, and served as a “propaganda tool” for the Chinese government by suppressing or promoting content favourable to the country’s interests. The allegations were made in a complaint on Friday in the US by Yintao Yu, the head of engineering for ByteDance’s US operations from August 2017 to November 2018, as part of a wrongful termination lawsuit filed earlier this month in San Francisco Superior Court. Yu claims he was fired for disclosing “wrongful conduct” he saw at the company. In the complaint, Yu alleges the Chinese government monitored ByteDance’s work from within its Beijing headquarters and provided guidance on advancing “core communist values”. Yu said government officials had the ability to turn off the Chinese version of ByteDance’s apps, and maintained access to all company data, including information stored in the United States.

>>18844628 China hails ‘substantial progress’ on trade ties with Australia - China says “substantial progress” has been made on stabilising trade ties with Australia during high-level ministerial talks and the country is willing to work towards “more positive results”. But Beijing continues to push for improved investment access in key areas, including critical minerals, and wants Australia’s support to gain entry to the trans-Pacific trade partnership.

>>18844640 Trick of the trade? China ‘ramping up the pressure’ - The truth is we don’t know when, or even if, China will remove tariffs and imposts on Australian imports. In January, China’s top diplomat in West Australia visited Geraldton Fishermen’s Co-operative. Rumours raced around the industry: were the fat years about to return? Five months on and not only has the unofficial black-listing not ended, China’s customs officials have clamped down on what had been a roaring illicit trade smuggled through Hong Kong and Taiwan. If normal market access is returned, the Albanese government will deserve much praise, but we should hold the applause until the Chinese follow through.

>>18849888 China, Australia resume high-level economic dialogue as bilateral ties improve under Albanese government - China and Australia are expected to see marked improvement in their trade ties with the two countries ramping up efforts to shore up economic cooperation following the recent resumption of high-level visits and dialogues, experts said. It could be considered as a starting point for the reset of their bilateral relations, which hit a very low point due to the anti-China policy by the previous Australian government. - Zhang Hongpei and Wang Jiamei - globaltimes.cn

>>18849904 Fishing boss sanctioned by the US for human rights abuses backs powerful Chinese-Australian group - A Chinese fishing magnate recently blacklisted by the US government for human rights abuses is a top donor and ‘permanent honorary chairman’ of an influential China-Australia organisation with suspected links to the Chinese government. Zhuo Xinrong has been a donor and senior office-holder with the Sydney-based Australia China Economics Trade and Culture Association (ACETCA) for more than eight years, and the organisation refuses to say it has cut ties with him.

>>18860436 Biden’s 11th hour Quad snub a disappointment, a mess and a gift to Beijing - Anthony Albanese’s disappointment is Xi Jinping’s victory. Joe Biden’s decision to pull out of next week’s Quad leaders’ summit in Sydney is a personal blow for the prime minister, who was preparing to bask in the glow of hosting three of the world’s most powerful leaders in his home town. China’s president-for-life, meanwhile, will be giddy with delight at the summit falling into disarray.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919653

#29 - Part 52

Australia / China Tensions - Part 10

>>18860441 Joe Biden skips Australia, PNG when ‘turning up is half the battle’ - Joe Biden’s cancellation of his Australian trip and the scrapping of next week’s Quad meeting in Sydney will be deeply disappointing for Anthony Albanese. The optics of a presidential visit, and of hosting the US, Indian and Japanese leaders together at the Opera House, would have capped-off a remarkable year of diplomacy for Albanese, who has proven to be a surprisingly capable international statesman.

>>18860738 How 'dark underbelly' and forced labour is helping to fuel Australia's love affair with cheap solar - Ramila Chanisheff is an ethnic Uyghur hailing from the north-western Chinese province of Xinjiang, or East Turkistan as she calls it. Xinjiang is one of the world's biggest producers of polysilicon, a crucial ingredient in modern-day solar panels. About 45 per cent of the world's supply comes from the province, where metallurgical grade silicon is crushed and purified in huge factories. But researchers and human rights activists claim those factories are also home to the widespread use of forced Uyghur labour.

>>18860751 Eleven Chinese institutes welcome Australian scholar’s planned Xinjiang visit in joint letter - Eleven Chinese academic institutes jointly released a letter of support to Maureen A Huebel, an Australian scholar, who has come under attack from anti-China forces after announcing her plan to visit China's Xinjiang region in 2024. In an article Huebel wrote to the Global Times in March, she stated reasons for her interest in the Xinjiang region when she noticed rising levels of Australian poverty and homelessness. Xinjiang was identified as among the fastest GDP growth of all Chinese provinces and regions. - GT staff reporters - globaltimes.cn

>>18860771 West's 'academic freedom' only a myth - What Australian scholar Maureen A. Huebel experienced recently is an example of how all talk of academic freedom in the West is just a myth. Huebel said on her Twitter handle that she planned a trip to the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region to "study how the Uygurs have contributed to the substantial growth in Xinjiang GDP and look at their population growth", but was bombarded with criticism, with some commenting her account was "fake" and others accusing her of spreading "propaganda". - Zhang Zhouxiang - chinadaily.com.cn

>>18865928 Video: Anthony Albanese visit to China on the table after Aussie timber ban lifted - Beijing’s top diplomat in Australia has revealed that talks are under way for Anthony Albanese to visit China “as quickly as possible”, amid improving trade relations between the countries after the lifting of punitive trade bans on $600m-a-year worth of Australian timber. China’s ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said there was “good momentum” in stabilising bilateral ties, and Chinese officials were working with their Australian counterparts to find “a time of mutual convenience” for the Prime Minister’s trip.

>>18865944 ‘China is not a threat': Ambassador Xiao Qian attacks Quad and AUKUS alliances as not in best interest of 'peace' in region - The Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian has declared that Beijing is “not a threat to Australia” as he condemned both the Quad and AUKUS alliances in the region. The first meeting of the Quad leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US to be held in Sydney was scrapped on Wednesday after President Joe Biden was forced to cancel his trip. Mr Xiao has labelled the alliance a “bad idea” and urged for the nations to “look at China objectively”.

>>18875151 Biden skips two legs of trip, erodes US credibility - The US President Joe Biden decided to curtail his upcoming trip to the Asia-Pacific by canceling a visit to Australia and Papua New Guinea due to the ongoing debt ceiling negotiations in Washington, which, some Chinese experts said reflects that Washington only treats its so-called allies and partners as chess pieces and instrument, and when its domestic issues override its political agenda, it easily turns back on its commitment. - Chen Qingqing and Xie Jun - globaltimes.cn

>>18875320 Chinese mouthpiece Global Times says Quad been dealt ‘fatal blow’ and is in crisis - The future of the Quad has been dealt a “fatal blow” and is in decline, China says, and it sets the stage for other “US-led anti-China cliques” to suffer the same fate. “If Western observers still believe in Quad, their analyses should be full of content about innovative ways to contain China and make the West great again,” the Global Times article stated. “There is no such wording, but only disappointment in the US.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919655

#29 - Part 53

Australia / China Tensions - Part 11

>>18875329 Cancellation of Sydney summit an omen of Quad's future fate - The planned Quad summit in Sydney, scheduled for May 24, has been canceled as Biden is busy putting out the financial fire of a possible debt default at home. The leaders will meet later this week on G7 sidelines in Japan instead. But, even though the gathering continues, it won't be the same. The cancellation of the Sydney summit is an omen of Quad's fate. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18875383 Playing the long game on China trade - "There were high hopes, but Trade Minister Don Farrell arrived back from China empty-handed. Conversation was apparently amicable. We were given assurances Chinese review of tariffs against Australian barley imports is on track. That’s effectively Beijing telling us it will remove restrictions on Australian exports in its own good time and according to its own opaque priorities and principles. As usual, China is playing a longer game. We need to as well." - John Lee, non-resident senior fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington and former senior adviser to the Australian foreign minister, 2016 to 2018 - afr.com

>>18875410 Albanese confirms Beijing invite, says China must remove trade bans - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sharpened his calls for China to remove all remaining trade restrictions on Australia as he prepares to meet world leaders at the G7, where Beijing’s use of economic coercion will dominate key forums. Confirming for the first time that he has officially been invited to Beijing and that a Quad meeting has been scheduled in Hiroshima, Albanese said it was important “that any of the impediments to trade between China and Australia be lifted”.

>>18875476 Former defence chief Angus Houston hits out at China, warns of 'miscalculation' leading to possible military conflict - One of the co-authors of Labor's Defence Strategic Review has sharply criticised Beijing's growing military activity in the South China Sea, accusing the emerging superpower of undermining Australia's national interest. Just weeks after the release of the DSR, former defence chief Sir Angus Houston has also expressed concern about the lack of lethality with the Royal Australian Navy's surface fleet and blasted the slow progress in producing missiles locally.

>>18876559 Video: ‘Illegal, malign’: China’s state-sponsored crime stretches across Pacific - Australia’s key law enforcement partners have launched a blistering attack on the Chinese government, saying the state actor poses the gravest threat to the security of Australia and its allies, while alleging that Beijing is also green-lighting organised crime bosses as agents of influence in Pacific Island nations. The FBI has described US and Australian efforts to ramp up the Western law enforcement presence in the Pacific, marked most recently by the Albanese government’s $317 million “Pacific expansion” funding package for the AFP, as aimed in part at countering China’s own efforts in the Indo-Pacific.

>>18876597 OPINION: There is a reason why the AFP won’t call out China - "Kershaw’s careful language needs to be viewed in the prism of maintaining a flow of intelligence from Chinese authorities about drug shipments from triad syndicates that arrive on Australian shores every other week. His is an unenviable juggling act. Kershaw’s federal agents have run exhaustive investigations into espionage and foreign interference allegedly conducted by Beijing’s security services in Australia. At the same time, the AFP relies on information from these same security services to stop Australians dying of drug overdoses." - Nick McKenzie - theage.com.au

>>18880112 Albanese ‘to travel to China’ but opposition warns trade sanctions should be lifted first - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has told world leaders he intends to travel to China, signalling he will push ahead with stabilising the relationship with Beijing despite ongoing trade sanctions and the arbitrary detention of two Australians. Albanese has not publicly confirmed a date for the trip, but the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s first visit to China as prime minister in October is looming as a symbolic marker for Canberra and Beijing after years of disputes over human rights, national security and trade.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919656

#29 - Part 54

Australia / China Tensions - Part 12

>>18880118 ‘Ours must not be an era of war’: Quad leaders pledge investment in Asia Pacific - The Quad will build undersea cable systems and fund infrastructure development and telecommunications across the Asia Pacific in an expansion of its remit designed to blunt China’s growing influence in the region. The announcement by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Joe Biden was coupled with a pledge to put south-east Asian nations and the Pacific Islands at the centre of its plans after a campaign by Beijing to paint the four nations as elite and out of touch with developing countries.

>>18880124 ‘Unspeakable consequences’: Kevin Rudd’s warning on China war - Kevin Rudd has painted a grim picture for Hong Kong’s future as an increasingly “Leninist and Marxist” Chinese Communist Party erodes the island’s freedoms and a US-led coalition seeks to counteract Beijing’s growing military and economic might. In one of his first public remarks as ambassador to the US, Mr Rudd also said the US, Australia and other democracies were united in an “active campaign of expanded deterrence to cause Xi Jinping to think twice and thrice about whether [China] could get away with any unilateral military action against Taiwan”.

>>18890103 Maturity on China boosts our global status: Richard Marles - Australia is being treated “more seriously as a country” since the Albanese government ended the nation’s “shrill” political debate over China and began stabilising relations with Beijing, Richard Marles has declared. Mr Marles, branded by Scott Morrison a “Manchurian candidate” prior to last year’s election, said the previous government issued “gratuitous and inflammatory comments” about China without regard for the interests of the Australian people.

>>18890113 Foreign Minister Penny Wong says prime minister won't visit China unless 'progress' is made - Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong has indicated Prime Minister Anthony Albanese won't travel to China unless "continued progress" is made to resolve trade and consular disputes. The invite from Chinese officials was made earlier this year and follows clashes between the two countries, which have in particular severely hindered Australian exporters.

>>18890116 DJI drone fleet grounded by Border Force amid links to Chinese military - The Australian Border Force has stopped using drones from a Chinese manufacturer under review by the Defence Department and black-listed in the US, Home Affairs chief operating officer Justine Saunders has told Senate estimates. “We have actually suspended the use of that capability,” she said in response to questioning from opposition home affairs spokesperson James Paterson.

>>18890171 Concerns secret classification of detainee blocked bail - Senior lawyers argue the conditions faced by a former US fighter pilot accused of aiding the Chinese military are impeding his case for bail. Daniel Duggan is facing extradition to the United States, where he will face charges of violating arms export laws and money laundering, which he denies. The Australian section of the International Commission of Jurists wrote to the NSW Corrective Services Commissioner raising concerns about how Mr Duggan was classified as a high-risk detainee, with documents about the classification withheld. The letter said without the information about why he was classified as high-risk, he couldn't properly prepare a bail application.

>>18895087 Forrest group Walk Free warns of slavery threat in Australia's solar panel supply chains - A human rights group funded by mining magnate Andrew Forrest has warned of the rapidly rising risks of modern slavery and forced labour in the world's renewable energy supply chains. Walk Free, an arm of Mr Forrest's Minderoo Foundation, will today release a report outlining how Australia imports $US17.4 billion [$26 billion] of products that may have used coerced labour. And it is warning that renewable energy products led by solar are increasingly susceptible to the risks, particularly those made in China.

>>18900821 Australia, Five Eyes partners blame China for malicious hacking campaign - Australia and its fellow Five Eyes security partners have called out China for a major state-sponsored hacking operation targeting critical infrastructure networks in the United States. Technology giant Microsoft, which uncovered the hack, said the campaign had been active since the middle of 2021 and targeted critical infrastructure assets in Guam, an island in the west Pacific Ocean that is home to some of America’s most important military bases. Guam would be expected to play an important role in any future conflict between the US and China over the self-governing island of Taiwan.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919659

#29 - Part 55

Australia / China Tensions - Part 13

>>18900833 Video: Five countries secretly sharing intelligence say China is the No.1 threat - Showing off deadly weaponry in massive war games is a tactic China and the United States both use to try to avoid full-on combat. But the truth is the two countries, as well as other nations including Australia, are already battling it out in an invisible war. There are no frontline soldiers but there are significant skirmishes. Until now these conflicts have been kept quiet, but key members of a secretive alliance of top cops from Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand are about to change that. In exclusive interviews with Nick McKenzie, the group known as the “Five Eyes” disclose startling information about the trouble they’re seeing. - 60 Minutes Australia

>>18906146 Video: China hits back over Five Eyes blame for US infrastructure cyber attack - China has hit back after Australia and other Five Eyes cyber agencies blamed it for recent cyber attacks targeting "critical infrastructure" in the United States. "Obviously, this is a collective disinformation campaign by the United States to mobilise the Five Eyes countries for geopolitical purposes," China's foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said.

#29 - Part 56

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide

>>18670801 Video: China health officials lash out at WHO, defend search for source of COVID-19 virus - Chinese health officials have defended their search for the source of the COVID-19 virus and lashed out at the World Health Organization after its leader said Beijing should have shared genetic information earlier. The director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention's, Shen Hongbing, said the WHO comments were "offensive and disrespectful."

>>18703519 Thousands left waiting for compensation after claims of COVID-19 vaccine injury - Thousands of people are still waiting to learn whether they will receive compensation for injuries they believe they incurred when receiving a coronavirus vaccine, as claimants and lawyers say delays are causing unnecessary distress to people with serious illnesses. The COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme covers losses or expenses of $1000 or more from injury resulting in hospitalisation or death from specific severe reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine.

>>18800871 Ivermectin ban ended by Australian regulator amid warning it should not be used as Covid treatment - The Therapeutic Goods Administration has ended a ban on off-label prescriptions of anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, nearly two years after floods of people attempted to procure the drug in the mistaken belief it would treat Covid-19. The TGA announced on Wednesday it would remove the ban for off-label prescriptions of the drug from 1 June. Off-label prescriptions had been limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious disease specialists since September 2021. The decision was made due to what the TGA said was “sufficient evidence that the safety risks to individuals and public health is low” in the “current health climate”.

>>18875725 Australian school imposes a mask mandate after a Covid outbreak among students - sparking outrage from parents and top doctor: 'No child should be compelled to wear one' - A high school has brought back a Covid mask mandate more than six months after they were entirely scrapped across the country, sparking backlash. Liverpool Girls' High School in Sydney's southwest announced on Tuesday that Year 9, 10 and 11 students would have to work from home immediately, while all staff and students still in school would have to wear masks. Dr Nick Coatsworth, who is well known as the face of the government's Covid vaccine rollout, told Daily Mail Australia that mask rules being reintroduced at the school was worrying. 'That is a problem. No child at an Australian school should be compelled to wear a mask,' the former Australian deputy chief health officer said.

>>18880132 Warning winter could mark arrival of fifth Covid wave across Australia - A prominent epidemiologist says it is “obvious” Australia is heading into its fifth wave of Covid. Over the last week, 38,226 cases were reported across Australia, with an average of 5461 cases per day. University of South Australia Professor Adrian Esterman said it is already very clear a new wave is coming in South Australia, where infections are forecast to double in the next fortnight.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919665

#29 - Part 57

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

>>18795043 Billionaire Investor Buys Jeffrey Epstein’s Private Islands For $60 Million - A private equity mogul, who says he never met Epstein, plans to develop a luxury resort on the infamous property. After more than a year on the market, Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous Caribbean islands have finally found a buyer: Stephen Deckoff, founder of private equity firm Black Diamond Capital Management, has purchased the two islands for $60 million, less than half of their initial asking price of $125 million. Deckoff plans to develop a 25-room luxury resort on the property, he said Wednesday, adding that he never met Epstein and never set foot on the islands until they were marketed following Epstein’s 2019 death.

>>18795043 Q Post #1001 - Where do roads lead? Each prince is associated with a cardinal direction: north, south, east and west. Sacrifice. Collect. [Classified]-1 - [Classified]-2 - Tunnels. Table 29. D-Room H - D-Room R - D-Room C - Pure EVIL. 'Conspiracy' - Q

>>18805504 'God save Virginia Giuffre': Protesters wave placards on Coronation route - Protesters stood shoulder to shoulder with royal supporters - the former dressed in yellow waving placards with slogans including “king parasite” and “abolish the monarchy”, while the latter were bedecked in Union flags. One placard read: "God save Virginia Giuffre", a reference to the alleged sexual abuse case involving Prince Andrew, who settled a case with Giuffre in February last year.

>>18805504 Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q

>>18810233 Frozen-out Andrew gets an equally chilly reception from crowd - As the King travelled to Westminster Abbey in a golden carriage, to huge cheers and the drumbeat of a military procession, his brother, Prince Andrew, was driven down the Mall in a car alone - and booed by crowds. Andrew was reportedly “left in the dark” until the last moment about whether he would be allowed to wear his ceremonial Knight of the Garter robes - and was “furious”. In the end, the late Queen’s second son got his way, walking into the abbey in a floor-length velvet robe, red sash and gold tassels. In 2015, Virginia Giuffre claimed she was forced to have sex with Andrew when she was 17 and he was a guest of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Andrew has always denied the allegations. An out-of-court settlement was reached with Giuffre in March last year - a reported pounds 3 million - in which he accepted no blame.

>>18810233 Q Post #3152 - Prince Andrew is deeply connected. Q

>>18824096 Count Inland Vampire Tweet: Nothing is beating this today. Nada. Whoever owns this placard, I love you with all my heart. #notallheroeswearcapes #GodSaveVirginiaGuiffre @VRSVirginia - https://twitter.com/InlandEmpire777/status/1654831159941971969

>>18824096 Virginia Roberts Giuffre Tweet: Humbled ♥️

>>18875740 Deutsche Bank to pay $US75m to settle Jeffrey Epstein accusers’ suit - Deutsche Bank has agreed to pay $US75m ($113m) to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging the financial institution facilitated Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring, said lawyers who sued the bank on behalf of alleged victims. A woman who is listed anonymously as Jane Doe in court papers filed the suit last year in New York on behalf of herself and other accusers of the disgraced financier. She alleged Deutsche Bank did business with Epstein for five years while knowing that he was using money in his bank accounts to further his sex-trafficking activity.

>>18885246 Epstein threatened to reveal Bill Gates’ ‘affair’ with young Russian - Jeffrey Epstein threatened to expose Bill Gates over an alleged affair with a Russian bridge player in her 20s, according to reports in the US. Convicted paedophile Epstein, who killed himself in jail in 2019, wanted Gates to support a charity he had set up. Gates, 67, refused to do so, and Epstein threatened to expose the alleged affair unless he co-operated, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919666

#29 - Part 58

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 1

>>18693432 ‘Heads in sand’: Labor lashed over NT child sex abuse claims - The Coalition has dug in behind Peter Dutton’s assertion of widespread child sexual violence in central Australia, with Liberal senator Simon Birmingham and opposition deputy leader Sussan Ley calling on the federal government to stop playing politics and take action.

>>18698736 Labor under pressure for minimising sexual assault cases - The Fyles Labor government is facing claims it tried to minimise and even deny alarmingly high rates of child sex abuse in the Northern Territory when its Treasurer, Eva Lawler, told a radio station: “Children have been sexually abused in Australia since, bloody, the place was probably settled”.

>>18744576 Ex-governor-general Peter Hollingworth 'fit for ministry' despite misconduct, Anglican Church board finds - An Anglican Church investigation has found former governor-general Peter Hollingworth committed misconduct by knowingly allowing paedophiles to remain in the church when he was Brisbane archbishop, but is "fit for ministry" if he apologises to two victim-survivors. The Professional Standards Board of the Anglican Church has been considering whether Dr Hollingworth, who remains a bishop, should be defrocked over his handling of abuse cases while he was archbishop in the 1990s. It found that Dr Hollingworth committed misconduct by allowing two priests he knew had sexually abused children to remain in the church.

>>18749555 Abuse survivors slam Anglican Church ruling of ex governor-general Peter Hollingworth amid calls for re-investigation - Survivors of church abuse have slammed the finding of an Anglican Church investigation into former governor-general Peter Hollingworth and called for him to be re-examined by an independent body. Dr Hollingworth resigned as governor-general in 2003, following a series of revelations that he allowed paedophile priests to keep working while he was the Archbishop of Brisbane in the 1990s. On Monday (24 April 2023), an inquiry by the Professional Standards Board of the Anglican Church ruled Dr Hollingworth should not be stripped or defrocked of his holy orders, despite finding he committed misconduct by allowing two priests to remain in the church who he knew had sexually abused children.

>>18749567 Peter Hollingworth: ‘Ex-governor-general not fit to function as priest’, say lawyers - Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth should have been stripped of his permission to officiate as an Anglican minister due to serious misconduct and deficiency of character, according to lawyers for the internal investigation into his wrongdoing. Counsel for the church-created Professional Standards Committee submitted that Dr Hollingworth’s failings were so deep that he should not be able to function as a priest and that if his mission were ratified it would erode trust in the vocation. But the Anglican-inspired tribunal that judged Dr Hollingworth ultimately decided that, despite finding multiple counts of misconduct, the former Archbishop of Brisbane had been ignorant of the needs of child sex abuse victims rather than wilfully negligent.

>>18755037 Convicted pedophile teacher Malka Leifer to seek leniency in sentencing - Convicted pedophile teacher Malka Leifer is set to argue “hardship” she has experienced in prison and the threat of deportation to try to get a more lenient sentence. Leifer will face a two-day pre-sentencing hearing in June after she was found guilty earlier this month of 18 rape and sexual assault charges against students at the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick.

>>18760774 Video: ‘Paedophiles’: Protesters opposed to drag queen event hurl abuse at councillors - Protesters opposing a planned drag story time event have called councillors paedophiles and derailed a Monash City Council meeting on Wednesday after the south-eastern Melbourne council refused to give in to abuse and pressure to scrap the family-friendly activity. Key groups, such as My Place and Reignite Democracy Australia, which espouse views often associated with alt-right or conspiracy theory thinking and can be hostile to the LGBTQ community, rallied supporters to descend on Monash Council’s offices in Glen Waverley on Wednesday night to demand the cancellation of its sold-out drag queen event. The council-run event, planned for May 19 at Oakleigh Library, will involve drag queen Sam Thompson reading books and singing songs to children and parents to mark International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919668

#29 - Part 59

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 2

>>18784957 We must still stand strong against those who betray our kids - "Imagine discovering your 14-year-old child had suffered childhood sexual assaults by the parish priest at primary school; that the previous year of self-destructive behaviour and suicide attempts were a result of those ongoing assaults. Imagine the rage. Imagine discovering 20 months later that a second child of yours had been sexually assaulted by the same priest, then that the priest had been sexually assaulting children since the 1940s. And that, through many complaints over the years, the hierarchy, bishops and archbishops, knew all about his history of offending but had not stopped him, which led to your children being sexually assaulted almost 50 years later. We then learned that he was not the only pedophile clergyman of whom they were aware and protected. It caused a group of us parents to rage against the hierarchy for their deception, betrayal and culpability. On October 22, 2018, I had the great honour of sitting on the floor of Parliament House in Canberra with Julia Gillard on one side and my daughter Katie on the other to hear the national apology. It hit a spot deep inside many of us, as the broken sobbing of one woman proved when her cries echoed through the parliamentary chamber. The national apology was a triumph for all victims; it was recognition of what victims had suffered as defenceless children at the mercy of bishops, clergy and other heartless people who cared nothing for them. The people who knowingly harboured child rapists were wrong, vile and criminal, and the apology proved it to the nation. The carnage we experienced with our daughters must stop. It is every adult’s duty to be forever vigilant in protecting the children in their lives and beyond." - Chrissie Foster, author of 'Hell on the Way to Heaven' and 'Still Standing'. Member of the Order of Australia for significant service to children, particularly as an advocate for those who have suffered sexual abuse. - theaustralian.com.au

>>18784972 Righteous rage - The Catholic Church’s betrayal of children - 'Still Standing' by Chrissie Foster, with Paul Kennedy. - "This is a book about rage, as Chrissie Foster says in her opening sentence. It is motivated and driven by rage and, if this is not an oxymoron, it is a panegyric to rage. Few people could have more cause for rage than Foster, two of whose three daughters were raped at primary school in Melbourne by Catholic priest Kevin O’Donnell, a paedophile monster about whom the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne knew for fifty years yet did nothing. One of Chrissie’s daughters, Emma, took her own life, while the second, Katie, who turned to drink to cope, was left in a wheelchair after a car crash. As religion reporter for The Age, I often sat alongside the Fosters in the 2013 Victorian Parliamentary Inquiry into how institutions responded to child abuse, which they attended throughout. I knew the rage must be smouldering inside - it would be impossible not to be - but I was constantly impressed by their quiet, stoic dignity and the calm, rational way their passion was expressed. Three decades after first taking up the cudgels, she is still furious that the high-ranking clergy who enabled and prolonged the sex crimes ‘of adult holy men against the small bodies of children for an average of 2.2 years each child’ have not been held to account. ‘Justice has not yet been served. How can our criminal law allow the Church hierarchy to just walk away from what it heartlessly orchestrated for decades, for centuries?’ It is the bishops (and bureaucrats) who emerge as the worst villains in this story. What could be more shameful or sad; what could more justly inspire rage?" - Barney Zwartz, Australian Book Review, May 2023 - australianbookreview.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919675

#29 - Part 60

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 3

>>18775283 ‘Jesus won’t forget this’: Catholic Church sued over alleged abuse by late Father Joe Doyle - The Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne is being sued over the alleged sexual abuse of two school students in the 1970s and ’80s by a priest who was found by the church to be a paedophile in 2005 and continued to perform clerical duties for more than a decade. Father Joseph Doyle, who died in 2021, has been accused of sexual abuse by two former students of Our Lady of Lourdes Primary School in Bayswater, where he served as parish priest for 37 years until his abrupt departure in 2005. Doyle allegedly molested and raped an 8-year-old boy in 1979 after promising to make him captain of the school’s football team, according to a writ filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria against the church late last year.

>>18784952 Video: Hillsong Church Global Investigation | 7NEWS Spotlight Full Documentary - From Hillsong to Hellsong, shocking new revelations about Brian Houston’s megachurch. Victims speak out in Spotlight’s season return, in this full length documentary. It was once hailed as one of the most influential religious organisations in the Western World, a global megachurch, preaching a rock’n’roll brand of modern Christianity. But just as quickly as Hillsong and its controversial leaders became superstars and super powerful, child sex abuse scandals would bring down its founder, Frank Houston, implicate his son, Brian, and dirty the faith’s squeaky-clean image. Now, in an explosive season return of 7NEWS Spotlight, guest reporter Tom Tilley lifts the lid on shocking new allegations of abuse and corruption that will shake the church to its core.

>>18800846 Marist Brothers lose bid to use paedophile’s death as shield against child abuse claims - A Catholic order has lost its latest attempt to use the death of a known paedophile clergy member to shield itself from allegations of child sexual abuse after a judge found that allowing such a course would “bring the administration of justice into disrepute”. In recent months, the Guardian has revealed how the Catholic church, in particular its Marist Brothers and Christian Brothers orders, is increasingly using the deaths of clergy members to argue for permanent stays of cases brought by abuse survivors in the civil courts. The Marist Brothers argued that the death of notorious paedophile Brother Francis “Romuald” Cable rendered it unable to fairly defend itself from a civil claim by a survivor known by the pseudonym of Mark Peters, because it can no longer call Cable as a witness. The NSW supreme court rejected the church’s attempts to use Cable’s death to justify a permanent stay. “The defendant should not, in my view, have the benefit of its own inaction,” justice Nicholas Chen found.

>>18804767 Saucon Valley must allow After School Satan Club to meet, judge rules - Federal judge John Gallagher ruled Monday (May 1, 2023) the After School Satan Club can begin holding meetings at Saucon Valley Middle School. The long-awaited decision said the Saucon Valley School District violated the First Amendment when it revoked the club's approval. In his opinion, Judge Gallagher recognized the difficulty Superintendent Jaime Vlasaty faced following a shooting threat related to the Satan Club, calling her position "unenviable." But the judge also said the suppression of the club's speech was not "Constitutionally permissible." Now, more than two months after its approval was revoked, the club is planning to hold its first meeting as early as next week.

>>18804793 Video: Boston SatanCon-goers shred Bible, pro-cop flag during opening ritual: ‘Hail Satan!’ - A group of Satanists cheered as two leaders opened SatanCon 2023 on Friday with a formal ceremony renouncing "symbols of oppression" by ripping up a Bible and a "Thin Blue Line" flag representing police. "We stand here today in defiance of their siege and destroy their symbols of oppression," a female leader told the crowd before ripping pages out of the Bible and throwing them on the floor, video showed. A male leader joined her in then tearing a "Thin Blue Line" flag in two, which they also tossed on the floor while the crowd cheered. Satanists in attendance later picked some of the ripped pages off the floor and posed with them for pictures.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919676

#29 - Part 61

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 4

>>18804800 Video: Un-Baptism Ceremony Held at "Biggest Satanic Gathering" at Boston SatanCon - An Un-Baptism ceremony was held at The Little Black Chapel of Satanic Temple during the 10th anniversary SatanCon event in Boston on Friday afternoon. Earlier in the day a satanic naming ceremony was held at the Marriott in Boston for the 10th annual SatanCon. Individuals walked up to a center altar where they chose a name to be identified by and the group chanted, "hail Satan." The individuals then received an upside-down cross on their foreheads before making devil horns with their hands and walking toward a cheering crowd.

>>18804816 Q Post #4627 - One party discusses God. One party discusses Darkness. One party promotes God. One party eliminates God. Symbolism will be their downfall. The Great Deceiver(s).

>>18804816 Q Post #4429 - The Armor of God - Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Have faith in Humanity. Have faith in Yourself. Have faith in God. The Great Awakening. Q

>>18804816 'Q Post #4396 - God wins. Q

>>18814655 Surge in sex abuse cases drives Catholic Church insurer to seek bailout - The Catholic Church’s insurer is considering winding down its ­operations unless another substantial bailout is made by dioceses and religious orders to plug the hole caused by sex abuse cases. Catholic Church Insurance is discussing closing its new and renewal general insurance business amid a continuing surge in abuse claims as well as the liability ­impacts of factors such as Australia’s erratic weather. The church hierarchy has been told the capital injection is needed about 18 months after shareholders pumped $170m into CCI to help cover sex abuse claims, amid significant losses.

>>18819570 Video: Victims of paedophile Rolf Harris, 93, speak out as new documentary shows the moment pervert jokes with Jimmy Savile about keeping little girl 'safe' - A new ITVX documentary has unearthed disturbing footage of Rolf Harris joking with Jimmy Savile about leaving a little girl 'safely in his arms'. The popular TV hosts - who, unbeknownst to audiences, were both prolific sex offenders - were filmed together in an episode of Savile's BBC series Jim'll Fix It in 1976. The clip shows Savile reading a letter submitted by a little girl named Lynn, requesting to watch Harris as creates one of his famous paintings. The young girl is then seen on stage with the pair as Savile jokingly asks Harris if he may 'leave her in your charge?' Harris pipes back: 'Safely leave her in my capable hands here…'

>>18835321 Peter Hollingworth surrenders permission to officiate as Anglican minister - Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth will surrender his church authority to officiate after another wave of condemnation over his mishandling of child sex abuse cases, saying the move was to alleviate survivor suffering and heal divisions in the Anglican Church. Dr Hollingworth told the Anglican Archbishop of Melbourne, Philip Freier, this week that he was returning his Permission to Officiate, just weeks after an internal church-instigated legal board found him guilty on multiple misconduct charges while running the church in the Diocese of Brisbane between 1990 and 2001.

>>18840662 ‘It’s probably easier to stay in the anger than to be vulnerable’ - Chrissie Foster, 67, fought the Catholic Church with her late husband Anthony for two decades after two of their three daughters were raped by their priest. Their youngest, Aimee, 38, escaped the abuse but not the fallout.

>>18844670 Former Melbourne Demons footballer Daniel Hayes serves Supreme Court writ on AFL and junior coach Mark Heaney - In a Victorian Supreme Court writ served on the AFL and former Eastern Ranges' assistant coach Mark Heaney this week by Daniel Hayes's lawyers, Arnold Thomas Becker, Hayes alleged that, following a boozy post-game barbecue at the home of Heaney, he was "raped" by Heaney after other guests had left. The court documents allege that: "As a result of the abuse, [Daniel Hayes] self-medicated with drugs and alcohol. He has made three suicide attempts" and "but for the abuse, [Daniel Hayes] would have continued with the Melbourne Demons". In response to questions from the ABC about Hayes's allegation, Heaney said: "I deny that. I had a professional relationship with him as a trainee and player."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919680

#29 - Part 62

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 5

>>18844722 Court documents reveal coach accused of raping former Melbourne player Daniel Hayes was a long-time AFL employee who coached Sydney Swans academy teams - A former elite junior football coach has been accused by former AFL player Daniel Hayes of rape back in 2005 and a writ has been lodged in the Victorian Supreme Court seeking damages. Mark Patrick Heaney was a senior AFL employee who played a crucial role in the code's expansion into New South Wales and coached Sydney Swans academy teams for three years. Heaney, who was the AFL's Northern New South Wales regional manager between 2009 and 2013, lost his job with the league in 2014 when he was convicted and jailed for grooming a 13-year-old junior footballer in 2013.

>>18844736 Video: Former Demon Daniel Hayes accused assistant coach of rape - Our next story may distress some viewers. A former Melbourne Demons rookie is suing the AFL and a former employee claiming in a Victorian Supreme Court writ that he was raped as a 17-year-old in 2005 by his assistant coach at the Eastern Ranges, Mark Heaney. A standout junior Daniel Hayes was drafted by the Demons the following year but never played a game after being cut from the club's list for repeatedly missing training. The writ, which was lodged this week, details his spiral into drug and alcohol abuse and his mental health struggles in the years since his AFL dream ended. - ABC NEWS (Australia)

>>18844758 Video: Former Melbourne Demons recruit Daniel Hayes suing AFL, coach over alleged rape as club junior - A former Melbourne Demons recruit is suing the AFL and a former coach of his from a junior football league, who he alleges sexually assaulted him after a game when he was a teenager. Daniel Hayes alleges that his former assistant coach of the Eastern Ranges, Mark Heaney, got him drunk and then raped him while Hayes was at a barbeque at Heaney's house when he was 17. "I put a lot of trust into Mark," Hayes told 9News. Heaney has publicly denied the claims and no charges have been laid.

>>18875613 Former Joondalup Health Campus CEO Kempton Cowan pleads guilty over child sex abuse videos - The former head of one of Western Australia's largest hospitals is facing a jail term after pleading guilty to accessing, soliciting and transmitting child abuse material. Kempton Cowan, 56, the one-time chief executive officer of the Joondalup Health Campus, appeared in the Magistrates Court and pleaded guilty to a total of 11 charges.

>>18875625 Peter Hollingworth’s decision to cease practising as a priest not enough, abuse survivors say - Abuse survivors are maintaining a push for Peter Hollingworth to be defrocked despite the former archbishop’s decision to cease practising as a priest, urging the Anglican church to “finally do the right thing”. In deciding to hand back his permission to officiate, Hollingworth acknowledged his continuing role in the church was a “cause of pain to survivors” and said he wanted to end the distress. But Beth Heinrich, an abuse survivor whose complaint against Hollingworth was central to the church’s internal complaints process, has written to the church’s professional standards committee, warning it against considering the decision as a “satisfactory outcome”.

>>18875802 Pennsylvania gets its first after-school Satan Club this week. In Hellertown. - The club, for kids 5-12, promises science and community service projects, nature activities, and tons of fun. “Educatin’ with Satan,” as they say. - This week, kids in the Lehigh Valley will get to join in a different kind of after-school program. You could say it had a hell of a time getting there. A federal judge has ordered that the Saucon Valley School District - located, ironically, in Hellertown - must allow the After School Satan Club, sponsored by The Satanic Temple, to meet on its property. It will be the first After School Satan Club in Pennsylvania. New Jersey and Delaware currently have no After School Satan Clubs. So far, six students have signed up for the club and more are expected.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919681

#29 - Part 63

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 6

>>18875811 After School Satan Clubs gain popularity amid legal victories - After School Satan Clubs have been steadily increasing in popularity and are not likely to slow as their supporters rack up media attention and legal wins fighting for free speech. The clubs, associated with the Satanic Temple and offered only in primary schools, began at the beginning of 2020 and quickly gained attention from parents who wanted an alternative to religious clubs, according to June Everett, campaign director of the After School Satan Club. “That’s kind of when things started blowing up. And I anticipate that every year moving forward is going to get busier and busier,” Everett told The Hill.

>>18875822 'Big plans for next school year': After School Satan Club looks to expand to high schools - An after-school club connected to the Satanic Temple is looking to expand to high schools, and the club's campaign director, June Everett said it has "big plans" for next school year. A new partnership between the club and the nonprofit group Secular Student Alliance could help expand the club's availability to other schools, including high schools. The Secular Student Alliance states on its website that it is the only national organization dedicated to atheist, humanist, and other nontheist students.

>>18875825 Video: 'After School Satan Club' holds first meeting - In the Lehigh Valley, the "After School Satan Club" held its first meeting following a court battle between the Satanic Temple and the Saucon Valley School District. The Satanic Temple was given the green light by a federal court earlier this month that it is the club's constitutional right to use Saucon Valley School District's middle school as its meeting place to gather. - WNEP-TV Pennsylvania

>>18875853 Satanists Sue Chicago For Not Allowing Them To Say ‘Hail Satan’ At City Council Meetings - Local Satanists are raising hell with a new lawsuit alleging the city is barring them from saying “Hail Satan” at City Council meetings. The lawsuit, filed this month by the Satanic Temple, says the city violated the religious group’s First Amendment rights by “excluding disfavored minority faiths” from giving an invocation at the start of City Council meetings. The Satanic Temple is a federally recognized religion with congregations across the United States and more than 14,000 members in Illinois, and it should be allowed to solemnize City Council just like any other religion, Minister of Satan Adam Vavrick, said.

>>18875856 Q Post #4942 - https://time.com/collection/great-reset/ - This is not about R v D. This is about preserving our way of life. If America falls, the World falls. Patriots on guard. Q

>>18894975 Video: Rolf Harris, disgraced former entertainer and convicted paedophile, dies aged 93 - The family of disgraced former entertainer and convicted paedophile Rolf Harris has revealed he died nearly two weeks ago at the age of 93. Harris's death was listed as both neck cancer and "fragility from old age". The 93-year-old died at his home in Berkshire on May 10, but the death was only registered in the UK on Tuesday. Once one of Australia's most famous celebrity exports - renowned as a television presenter, musician and painter - Harris was prosecuted in 2013 for indecent assault against girls and young women between 1968 and 1986.

>>18894986 Convicted paedophile Rolf Harris’ death may unleash new wave of allegations - The multimillion-dollar estate of disgraced entertainer Rolf Harris is bracing for a flood of new claims and allegations against the Australian after his family announced his death from cancer in Britain. Fresh allegations against the sex offender have been aired as recently as March, when a Melbourne woman claimed she was assaulted 40 years ago after he performed at a camp at Mount Eliza on the Mornington Peninsula.

>>18895074 Police officer who led investigation into Brittany Higgins's rape allegation reveals he is sexual assault survivor - The head investigator into Brittany Higgins's allegation that she had been raped has revealed he is a survivor of sexual assault. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller disclosed the information on his third day of giving evidence to an ACT board of inquiry, which is examining the conduct of criminal justice agencies in the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann. Wrapping up his time providing evidence, Superintendent Moller's lawyer, Matt Black, asked him what life experience he brought to his role with ACT police. Superintendent Moller told the inquiry that 45 years ago he was sexually assaulted. "I'm a survivor," he said. "That has driven my desire to make sure [other victims are supported]."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919687

#29 - Part 64

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 7

>>18900789 Melbourne couple allegedly kept domestic slave at Point Cook home - A couple have been charged with modern-day slavery offences after they allegedly kept a woman as a domestic slave at their home in Melbourne’s south-western suburbs for about 10 months. A healthcare worker raised the alarm with authorities last October after noticing the woman was “exhibiting indicators of human trafficking”. Australian Federal Police alleges the woman was kept in domestic servitude at the Point Cook home from January and until October 2022, when federal officers swooped on the property following the tip-off. Officers allege the 44-year-old man and 29-year-old woman exercised coercive control over the victim, limited her movements and physically assaulted her.

>>18900794 Point Cook couple faces court accused of harbouring a slave - A Point Cook couple has faced court accused of keeping a slave in a western suburbs home after medical staff contacted police with concerns a woman may have been a victim of human trafficking. Angie Yeh Ling Liaw, 29, and Chee Kit Chong, 44 - also known as Max Chong - faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday charged with three slavery-related offences. They include allegations the married couple possessed a slave and used coercion and threats to control the female at their home in Melbourne’s west.

>>18900811 Peter Hollingworth will never officiate in Australia as Anglican church body dumps plans to appeal inquiry findings - Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth will never officiate in the Anglican Church anywhere in Australia after investigators threatened to appeal a board decision to allow him to have a limited role in services. The Anglican diocese of Melbourne’s Professional Standards Committee has revealed it was preparing to appeal the board findings that would have paved the way for Dr Hollingworth to officiate in a qualified way in Melbourne. But on May 12, Dr Hollingworth announced his intention to return his permission to officiate and this was accepted by the church on May 19.

>>18906203 Video: Pain lingers for victims of Puffing Billy child abuser - Twelve-year-old Sam* stood watching level crossing railway works on a busy Camberwell road the day he first met by chance the man who would become his abuser. Child sex offender Anthony John Hutchins, then aged 33, struck up a conversation with the boy and discovered they both loved railways, asking the child if he wanted to join him as a volunteer at tourist attraction Puffing Billy in 1975. Within weeks, Hutchins began collecting the child and driving him to and from the Belgrave railway, before repeatedly sexually abusing the boy in an engine shed, his car and even the child’s own home over the following four years. On Friday May 26, an 81-year-old Hutchins appeared in the County Court of Victoria after pleading guilty to sexual offending against two boys. “Looking back I feel cheapened by the memories I now realise was in effect grooming. The vulnerability I had as a child, the common interest I had in trains … made me an easy target,” Sam said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18919690

#29 - Part 65

Qanon / Conspiracy Theory Hit Pieces, Australia and Worldwide

>>18714072 Tarnished Trump may hand Biden a new term - "Joe Biden has always been underestimated and his political obituary written and rewritten. But Biden, with a string of accomplishments and almost certain to face Donald Trump, has as good a chance of re-election as any president despite his advanced age. Trump was a criminal businessman and criminal president who committed high treason against the US when he sought to undermine and then overturn the 2020 election. Trump was a terrible president who diminished US global standing by weakening alliances and disastrously managed the pandemic response. (Anyone for an injection of bleach?)" - Troy Bramston - theaustralian.com.au

>>18755069 Video: Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch face another giant legal claim over Fox News 'disinformation' - The lawyer representing voting technology company, Smartmatic, says Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch are key to the $US2.7 billion ($4.05 billion) case they have brought against Fox News and Fox Corporation. The US cable news network is accused of spreading disinformation in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, in support of Donald Trump's false claims the election was stolen. "Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch, from our perspective, are front and centre to the decision making that was done at Fox Corporation that allowed and encouraged this type of disinformation," Erik Connolly told 7.30.

>>18795008 Rupert’s our ‘deadliest export’, Trump’s an egomaniac bully, says Turnbull - Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has described Rupert Murdoch as Australia’s deadliest export, saying no one has done more to damage American democracy than the US-based media mogul. And as Donald Trump’s campaign to return to the White House builds momentum, Turnbull also gave his frank assessment of the former president, branding him a “shameless showman” and a “bully” whose lies about the 2020 election being stolen constituted “gaslighting on an epic scale”. Speaking at an event hosted by Heather Ridout, Australia’s new consul-general in New York, and titled “Defending Democracy”, Turnbull told the audience: “What we saw in this country was a government that was nearly overthrown in a coup promoted by the president - and in an environment that was enabled by Fox News and other right-wing media. I say this without any sense of hyperbole: I do not believe that there is any individual alive today that has done more damage to American democracy than Rupert Murdoch. You might say [he’s] Australia’s deadliest export.” - Farrah Tomazin - smh.com.au

>>18855376 OPINION: Trump’s ‘evil charisma’ menaces the US, and Australia - "A resurrected Trump would feel emboldened to follow his instincts, making him more unpredictable and dangerous than his first term. America would again become a climate laggard and its support for Ukraine’s fight against Russia would be in doubt. The implications for Australia would be especially profound given how tightly enmeshed the two nations have become in response to China’s rise to superpower status. A Trump tantrum about handing over America’s precious Virginia-class submarines would unravel the AUKUS pact and leave Australia’s maritime security badly exposed. An increasing number of Australians would question the long-term value of the US alliance. A Trump victory in 2024 would be an almighty cataclysm. It’s happened before and can happen again." - Matthew Knott - theage.com.au

>>18885282 Biased FBI, complicit media failed US democracy in pursuit of Donald Trump and Russia election hoax - "The release of the much-anticipated Durham report in the US has laid out in shocking detail how a conversation between former Australian foreign minister Alexander Downer and Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos, in a London wine bar in 2016, led to the greatest case of election interference in US history. A highly politicised FBI seized on a vague paragraph, provided by the Australian government, that indicated Papadopoulos had said Russia could help the Trump campaign with the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton. Whatever Trump’s flaws and his later misdeeds, he didn’t deserve this, and his supporters are right to be furious." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18928658

File: 3197e40022693e4⋯.jpg (153.01 KB,1280x853,1280:853,OZ_Damper.jpg)

NEW OZ BREAD

Q Research AUSTRALIA #30: EVIL KNOWS NO BOUNDS Edition

>>18924779

>>18924779

>>18924779

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18928661

File: 2015a5bad6477b7⋯.jpg (95.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Afghanistan_Military_Dawn_….jpg)

Filling #29…..

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18928663

File: 0cc13ee10b34645⋯.jpg (109.75 KB,960x640,3:2,Hundreds_of_people_includi….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18928665

File: 724d2f568d5b33b⋯.jpg (233.63 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,John_Murphy_pays_his_respe….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

505112 No.18928667

File: 9f9b4417d1078b5⋯.jpg (3.16 MB,2800x2000,7:5,Chairman_of_the_Joint_Chie….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]