[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/qresearch/ -  Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


Welcome Page | Archive | qnotables archive | Q's Board: /projectdcomms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS /TheStorm | TOR link
Practice Bake HERE: /comms | /qrn |

File: 4870557c1818a7f⋯.png (214.03 KB,1200x600,2:1,ClipboardImage.png)

e59831 No.18924779 [Last50 Posts]

Welcome To Q Research AUSTRALIA

A new thread for research and discussion of Australia's role in The Great Awakening.

Previous thread

>>18422592 Q Research AUSTRALIA #28

Q's Posts made on Q Research AUSTRALIA threads

Wednesday 11.20.2019

>>7358352 ————————————–——– These people are stupid.

>>7358338 ————————————–——– All assets [F + D] being deployed.

>>7358318 ————————————–——– What happens when the PUBLIC discovers the TRUTH [magnitude] re: [D] party corruption?

Tuesday 11.19.2019

>>7357790 ————————————–——– FISA goes both ways.

Saturday 11.16.2019

>>7356270 ————————————–——– There is no escaping God.

>>7356265 ————————————–——– The Harvest [crop] has been prepared and soon will be delivered to the public for consumption.

Friday 11.15.2019

>>7356017 ————————————–——– "Whistle Blower Traps" [Mar 4 2018] 'Trap' keyword select provided…..

Thursday 03.28.2019

>>5945210 ————————————–——– Sometimes our 'sniffer' picks and pulls w/o applying credit file

>>5945074 ————————————–——– We LOVE you!

>>5944970 ————————————–——– USA v. LifeLog?

>>5944908 ————————————–——– It is an embarrassment to our Nation!

>>5944859 ————————————–——– 'Knowingly'

Q's Posts referencing Australia

https://qanon.pub/?q=AUS

https://qanon.pub/?q=australia

https://qanon.pub/?q=koala

https://qanon.pub/?q=HouseOfCards

https://qanon.pub/?q=boomerang

https://qanon.pub/?q=45HarisonHarold

https://qanon.pub/?q=6572656

https://qanon.pub/?q=RAT%20BAIT

https://qanon.pub/?q=VERY%20important

https://qanon.pub/?q=remain%20in%20the%20light

https://qanon.pub/?q=news.com.au

Q's Posts referencing Australian citizens

Malcolm Turnbull (X/AUS)

Former Prime Minister of Australia, 2015 to 2018

https://qanon.pub/?q=X%2FAUS

https://qanon.pub/?q=call%20details

https://qanon.pub/?q=Threat%20to%20AUS

Alexander Downer

Former Australian Liberal Party politician and former Australian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom

https://qanon.pub/?q=Downer

Cardinal George Pell

Australian Cardinal of the Catholic Church and former Prefect of the Vatican Secretariat for the Economy

https://qanon.pub/?q=Pell

https://qanon.pub/?q=cardinal-george-pell

https://qanon.pub/?q=pecking

Julian Assange

Australian activist, founder, editor and publisher of WikiLeaks

https://qanon.pub/?q=assange

https://qanon.pub/?q=JA

https://qanon.pub/?q=Under%20protection

https://qanon.pub/?q=WL

https://qanon.pub/?q=wikileaks

https://qanon.pub/?q=crowdstrike

https://qanon.pub/?q=server

https://qanon.pub/?q=Seth

https://qanon.pub/?q=SR

https://qalerts.app/?q=snowden

https://qalerts.app/?q=roadmap

Virginia Roberts Giuffre

American-Australian survivor of the sex trafficking ring operated by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

https://qanon.pub/#4568

https://qanon.pub/#4728

https://qanon.pub/#1054

https://qanon.pub/?q=chandler

https://qanon.pub/?q=epstein

https://qanon.pub/?q=island

https://qanon.pub/#1001

https://qanon.pub/#1861

https://qanon.pub/#3145

https://qanon.pub/#3147

https://qanon.pub/#4578

https://qanon.pub/#3432

https://qanon.pub/#3497

https://qanon.pub/#4727

https://qanon.pub/#4797

https://qanon.pub/?q=wexner

https://qanon.pub/#4576

https://qanon.pub/#4577

https://qanon.pub/?q=maxwell

https://qanon.pub/#4569

https://qanon.pub/?q=spacey

https://qanon.pub/#4570

https://qanon.pub/?q=normalize

https://qanon.pub/?q=Prince%20Andrew

https://qanon.pub/#4579

https://qanon.pub/#4907

https://qanon.pub/#4911

https://qanon.pub/#4921

https://qanon.pub/?q=Welcome%20aboard.

https://qanon.pub/?q=dershowitz

https://qanon.pub/?q=Dearest%20Virginia

Q's Posts referencing The Five Eyes intelligence alliance (FVEY)

An anglophone intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States

https://qanon.pub/?q=FVEY

https://qanon.pub/?q=Five%20Eyes

https://qanon.pub/?q=Interesting%2C

https://qanon.pub/?q=RAT%20BAIT

"Does AUS stand w/ the US or only select divisions within the US?"

Q

Nov 25 2018

https://qanon.pub/#2501

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928487

Notables

are not endorsements

#29 - Part 1

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>18670782 NATO calls Albanese to Lithuania summit - Anthony Albanese has been invited to attend NATO’s upcoming summit in Lithuania amid fears over China’s growing alignment with Russia and the authoritarian powers’ systemic threat to the international order.

>>18670815 US government facing compensation claim over Navy officer’s $150 sex with Melbourne teen - A former Melbourne sex worker has launched legal action against the US government over allegations a senior officer in the US Navy had sex with her in the 1990s - when she was just 15 and addicted to heroin. Lisa Harris, 39, will pursue compensation under an agreement between the US and Australia, which provides recourse for local victims of alleged misconduct by American military personnel.

>>18676786 Latitude refuses to pay hackers’ ransom demand - Consumer lender Latitude Financial Group has refused to pay a ransom demand from hackers who stole the details of 14 million consumers last month, but would not say if the criminals have threatened to release the data, which includes driver’s licence details.

>>18676802 Hiding in the Russian consulate for months, ‘Aussie Cossack’ demands a prisoner swap - “The Aussie Cossack”, Simeon Boikov, was on parole for breaching a suppression order when he was told by police he was wanted after the alleged assault of a pro-Ukrainian protester. Rather than face arrest on the eve of a planned trip to Moscow in December, he drove straight to the Russian consulate. The Herald understands diplomatic discussions are under way about how to get Boikov out of Australia.

>>18676820 Video: ‘Our soldiers’ new crush’: Ukraine enlists AC/DC in plea for Australian Hawkei military vehicles - The Ukrainian government has taken to social media to plead with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to donate protected mobility vehicles to help beat back invading Russian forces, describing the Australian-made four-wheel drives as its new military “crush”. In a Twitter message, Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence said: “Our soldiers absolutely love Australian Bushmasters. But now they have a new crush: the Hawkei. These two would be a perfect match on the battlefield. We would truly appreciate their reunion in Ukraine, @AlboMP!” The post was accompanied by a minute-long video, set to a soundtrack of AC/DC’s Back in Black, showing Hawkeis in action and describing them as a “perfect reconnaissance vehicle”.

>>18676841 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post: Leaders of Marine Rotational Force Darwin meet with Ambassador Caroline Kennedy at the U.S. Embassy Australia. The annual rotation of Marines underpins the illustrious history shared between the United States and Australia. #AlliesandPartners #marines

>>18682169 Quarter of Tasmania’s population hacked by Russians, says Premier Jeremy Rockliff - Up to a quarter of Tasmanians may have had personal data stolen by Russian-linked hackers, the Premier has suggested. Jeremy Rockliff on Tuesday said the scale of the hack of Education Department data handled by third-party transfer system GoAnywhere MFT had emerged after a “very complex analysis”.

>>18682176 Crikey alleges Lachlan Murdoch morally culpable for Capitol riots - Online news outlet Crikey has alleged Lachlan Murdoch was “morally and ethically” culpable for the deadly 2021 US Capitol riots in its amended defence to the defamation suit filed by the elder son of Rupert Murdoch, in an escalation of the dispute between the parties. Murdoch junior, chief executive of Fox Corporation and co-chairman of News Corp, filed Federal Court defamation proceedings in August against Crikey over a June 29, 2022 article naming his family as “unindicted co-conspirators” of Donald Trump following the US Capitol riots in 2021.

>>18687374 Peter Dutton clashes with reporter after grim Alice Springs warning - Liberal leader Peter Dutton has warned “somebody is going to get killed” in Alice Springs and unleashed on an ABC reporter during a shocking account of the violence and sexual abuse in the town.

>>18687384 Pressure on Anthony Albanese to attend NATO summit - Anthony Albanese is under pressure to attend the upcoming NATO summit in Lithuania amid signs of European reluctance to take a firm stand against China’s growing assertiveness and disregard for international norms.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928489

#29 - Part 2

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>18687407 Video: ‘The worst of American politics’: Premier backs drag performers after cafe threats - Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews says the targeting of drag events is the worst of American politics creeping into the state after a Melbourne cafe cancelled a children’s craft and games event hosted by drag queens.

>>18693432 ‘Heads in sand’: Labor lashed over NT child sex abuse claims - The Coalition has dug in behind Peter Dutton’s assertion of widespread child sexual violence in central Australia, with Liberal senator Simon Birmingham and opposition deputy leader Sussan Ley calling on the federal government to stop playing politics and take action.

>>18693485 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese named in Time's 100 most influential people list - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been included in Time magazine's list of the 100 most influential people of 2023, alongside King Charles III, Ukraine's First Lady, Olena Zelenska, and model Bella Hadid. Mr Albanese joins former prime ministers Kevin Rudd and John Howard as the only other Australian leaders to have made the list, while Julia Gillard was shortlisted in 2013.

>>18693513 Ringleader of the ‘tinnie terrorists’ Robert Musa Cerantonio to be freed from jail in May - The leader of the so-called “tinnie terrorists”, self-styled preacher Robert Musa Cerantonio, will be back on the streets in May after completing a seven-year jail term for planning to overthrow The Philippines government. He is one of seven high-risk terrorist offenders due for release into the community this year, as the government and police prepare to abandon the continued detention orders that have allowed authorities to jail dangerous ­people beyond the end of their prison terms.

>>18696839 Video: ‘I’d stake my life on it’: Trump has ‘no chance’ of an election win - The recent arrest of Donald Trump “guarantees” the former US president a Republican nomination for president however he has “no chance” of scoring an election win in 2024, says Former Howard government minister Peter McGauran. “He has no chance whatever,” he told Sky News Australia. “I’d stake my life on it.”

>>18698609 Video: Kids return to the streets in Alice Springs to run amok - "The girl looks about 14. “I’m drunk, f_ck you,” she yells as we pass on the street. It’s 11.20pm on Thursday in Alice Springs, and the group of a dozen or so Indigenous children and early teens heads on towards the main drag of town. Most of the kids are around 15, with some closer to 10 or 11. Three months on from our first reports revealing the extent of kids running wild in Alice Springs and it’s clear little has changed. Perhaps nothing." - Liam Mendes - theaustralian.com.au

>>18698622 Linda Burney just metres from fatal stabbing of woman - Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has expressed her heartfelt condolences to the family of a woman who died after being stabbed metres away from the federal cabinet minister in Darwin on Friday. Burney and her staff were in the foyer of the Doubletree Hilton just before 6pm when the woman ran into the hotel bleeding heavily. Police allege she was stabbed directly outside the hotel on the Esplanade. Some of Burney’s staff helped attend to the woman along with hotel staff, while the minister comforted members of the woman’s family. The woman was taken to the Royal Darwin Hospital but died a short time later.

>>18698686 Video: Wild night of violent crime in Darwin: Woman stabbed to death in CBD, man and woman stabbed at city's busiest shopping centre - A woman has died after being stabbed outside a CBD hotel in a wild night of crime in Darwin, while two others were allegedly set upon by knife-wielding attacker at Casuarina Square shopping centre. Sky News has also been sent video footage of a brawl at the shopping centre’s bus exchange earlier the same evening. A group of men can be seen chasing a man who then appears to be hit by a passing bus. The incidents come less than a month after 20-year-old Declan Laverty was stabbed to death while working at a Darwin bottle shop.

>>18698736 Labor under pressure for minimising sexual assault cases - The Fyles Labor government is facing claims it tried to minimise and even deny alarmingly high rates of child sex abuse in the Northern Territory when its Treasurer, Eva Lawler, told a radio station: “Children have been sexually abused in Australia since, bloody, the place was probably settled”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928494

#29 - Part 3

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>18698909 Talisman Sabre 2023: Australian Defence Force leads largest ever military drill - Australia will host one of the largest military drills in the world with more than 30,000 personnel and dozens of ships, aircraft and armoured vehicles mobilising from across the region. Such is the size of the Talisman Sabre 2023 exercise, the “battlefield” has been extended from across the top of Australia to swathes of the Coral Sea down as far south to Jervis Bay in NSW and will even involve Norfolk Island. The biennial two-week exercise has long been one of the largest Australian Defence Force hosted exercises, run largely with the United States military and involving 17,000 troops.

>>18698909 Talisman Sabre - MAGIC SWORD - https://qanon.pub/?q=Operation%20Specialists - https://qanon.pub/?q=magic

>>18703552 Inside the Firm: How an international drug cartel plotted a ‘line to Australia’ - The inner workings of Swedish kingpin Maximilian Rivkin’s crime empire have leaked onto the internet, revealing a plan to target Australia’s insatiable drug market to make them rich beyond measure. The unprecedented glimpse inside transnational drug crime and the AN0M network comes on the eve of a court case that could decide dozens of AN0M-related prosecutions in NSW.

>>18708643 Video: Lidia Thorpe in clash outside Melbourne strip club - Lidia Thorpe has defended her behaviour outside a Melbourne strip club, after footage surfaced of her yelling profanities and telling men they had small genitalia. The former Greens turned Independent senator Thorpe claimed people were trying to “drag me down,” in a brief statement.

>>18708691 Twitter labels ABC and SBS ‘government-funded media’ - ABC and SBS will not quit Twitter, after the social media platforms labelled the public broadcasters’ news services “government-funded media”, lumping the two into a category previously used for government mouthpieces. Twitter moved on Monday to label ABC News’ account on its platform “government funded media”, in the wake of similar moves in recent weeks that earned the ire of users, leading some media groups to quit the site. SBS, which was also hit with the “government-funded media” label on Monday, told The Australian the broadcaster would push back on the move.

>>18708709 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post - MRF-D Marines and Army soldiers with 103 Battery, 8/12 Regiment, 1st Brigade - Australian Army conduct dry fire drills on the M777A2 lightweight 155mm howitzers at Robertson Barracks, Darwin, Northern Territory, April 6, 2023. Through increased training and exercises, MRF-D and Defence Australia are expanding our range of interoperability, further strengthening the historic Alliance. #MRFD #YourADF #AlliesandPartners #trainhard

>>18714027 Defence blames braking fault in Hawkei armoured vehicles for reluctance to supply Ukraine - Defence is blaming a braking fault affecting the army’s fleet of 1100 Hawkei armoured vehicles for its reluctance to supply war-torn Ukraine with the Australian-made four-wheel drives. The anti-lock braking system fault can undermine the vehicle’s stopping power at high speeds but does not affect its off-road performance. Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said his country hoped to acquire an initial 30-60 Hawkeis to support the country’s coming counteroffensive against Vladimir Putin’s Russian forces.

>>18719453 IBAC finds Victorian government advisors put pressure on public servants to award contract to union - Senior staff in Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews's government interfered and pressured public servants to ensure lucrative contracts were awarded to a key Labor Party ally without competitive tender, the state's anti-corruption watchdog has found. The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) has slammed the premier, health ministers and the public service for the awarding of a contract in 2018 to the Health Workers Union (HWU) to deliver specialist training to deal with occupational violence. "The union was given privileged access and favourable treatment,'' IBAC's Operation Daintree found.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928497

#29 - Part 4

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>18719500 Video: U.S. Marines and Aussies Form an Unbreakable Bond Through Dry-Fire Drills - U.S. Marines with Kilo Battery, 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment (Reinforced), Marine Rotational Force-Darwin, and Australian Army soldiers with 103 Battery, 8/12 Regiment, 1st Brigade, conduct dry fire exercises, with M777A2 lightweight 155mm howitzers, at Robertson Barracks, Northern Territory, Australia, April 6, 2023. Through increased training and exercises, MRF-D and the Australian Defence Force are expanding their range of interoperability, further strengthening the Alliance. (U.S. Marine Corps video by Cpl. Gabriel Antwiler) - Defense Now

>>18719526 U.S. Marines Tweet: Col. Brendan Sullivan, commanding officer of @MRFDarwin, visits the Australian War Memorial alongside @AustralianArmy Maj. Todd O’Callaghan, Directorate of Army Operations, Australian Army Headquarters, April 6. #MRFD23 focuses on regional relationships with #AlliesAndPartners.

>>18723461 Foreign spies are aggressively seeking ‘disloyal’ insiders with access to Australia’s secrets, ASIO warns - Foreign spies are “aggressively seeking secrets across all parts of Australian society”, including trying to recruit “disloyal” government insiders to access classified information, ASIO has warned. The intelligence agency said “hostile foreign powers and their proxies” were seeking to test the Australian government’s security clearance system. In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry, ASIO argued in favour of legal changes to enable the agency to become centrally responsible for issuing the highest level of security clearances in Australia.

>>18723495 Anthony Albanese in ‘racist and misogynistic’ bid to silence me: Lidia Thorpe - Lidia Thorpe says Anthony Albanese’s suggestion she should “get some help” is a “continuation of a racist and misogynistic narrative” used to silence Indigenous people. The independent Indigenous senator also claimed she was “harassed by racists” last Sunday when she was filmed leaving a strip club at 3am, and the media had mischaracterised the incident.

>>18723554 Kevin Rudd downplays backlash over attacks on Donald Trump, meets Joe Biden - Kevin Rudd has brushed aside concerns his past attacks on Donald Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president, will hinder Australia’s relationship with the US or Republicans in a short press conference in Washington DC after presenting his credentials to Joe Biden. Mr Rudd had unleashed on Mr Trump repeatedly in public, calling him a “a traitor to the West”, guilty of “rancid treachery” as recently as February last year. “The bottom line is I’ve been in this town on and off for 30 years, I have bucketloads of Republican friends and bucketloads of Democrat friends, working in foreign policy and national security,” he said.

>>18723554 Kevin Rudd Tweet: Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery.

>>18723554 Q Post #2576 - Those with the most to lose are the loudest. Those who 'knowingly' broke the law in a coordinated effort [treason] are the most vocal. Crimes against Humanity. Q - https://qanon.pub/#2576

>>18723589 Video: Exercise Talisman Sabre: Dates released for Australia’s largest military training activity with US - More than 30,000 military personnel, mostly from the Australian Defence Force and US Armed Forces, are expected to converge on Queensland, parts of northern NSW and Darwin from June to early August for Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 (TS23), a large-scale military training activity that culminates in a mock war between all military branches on land, sea and in the air. The peak of the training, which also incorporates crews in fighter jets and aircraft carrier ships, is scheduled to take place between July 21 and August 4.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928517

#29 - Part 5

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>18729080 Albanese to attend NATO summit - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has agreed to attend the NATO summit in Lithuania in July after coming under criticism when it appeared he would skip the high-powered gathering. Albanese attended last year’s NATO summit at the invitation of host country Spain, but The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age reported he did not intend to attend this year’s summit, in part because of a packed schedule of travel including the coronation of King Charles III in London next month. A spokeswoman for Albanese on Friday confirmed Albanese would attend the summit.

>>18729094 Lachlan Murdoch drops defamation case against Crikey publisher - Fox Corporation chief Lachlan Murdoch has dropped his defamation proceedings against the publisher of online news outlet Crikey and several of its editors and executives. Mr Murdoch sued Private Media in the Federal Court in August over an article published by Crikey, claiming it defamed him in referring to his family as "unindicted co-conspirators" in the US Capitol riots. On Friday his lawyers filed a notice to discontinue the case. It comes days after Fox settled a defamation case in the US brought by Dominion Voting Systems, for $1.17 billion.

>>18734262 Hambali lawyer seeks AFP records for pre-trial hearing at Guantanamo Bay - The Australian Federal Police have stonewalled repeated requests to provide access to their records on the accused Bali bombing mastermind known as Hambali ahead of his first pre-trial hearing next week, his US military lawyer says. Encep “Hambali” Nurjaman, who was once Southeast Asia’s most wanted terrorist, will face a military court in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, next week for just the second time since his arrest in Thailand 20 years ago.

>>18737067 Discovery Of WW2 Shipwreck Ends Australia’s ‘Tragic’ Maritime Chapter - Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Saturday that the wreck of a Japanese merchant ship, sunk in World War Two with 864 Australian soldiers on board, had been found in the South China Sea, ending a tragic chapter of the country’s history. Marles said the SS Montevideo Maru, an unmarked prisoner of war transport vessel missing since being sunk off the Philippines’ coast in July 1942, had been discovered northwest of Luzon island. The ship was torpedoed en route from what is now Papua New Guinea to China’s Hainan by a U.S. submarine, unaware of the POWs onboard. It is considered Australia’s worst maritime disaster.

>>18744473 Australian ‘energy supply risk’ worries Japan: ambassador Shingo Yamagami - The outgoing and outspoken Japanese ambassador to Australia, Shingo Yamagami, has warned in a departure interview that “sovereign risk” is now an active concern among Japan’s corporates and energy companies which fear the reliability of Australia as an energy supplier.

>>18744677 Video: LIVE: Gallipoli Dawn Service | Anzac Day 2023 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST - ABC Australia

>>18744686 Video: Anzac Day Melbourne Dawn Service 2023 - ShrineMelbourne

>>18744705 Live: Anzac Day 2023 Sydney Dawn Service | April 25, 2023 from 4:25am AEST - 9 News Australia

>>18744714 Video: Anzac Day 2023: Currumbin Dawn Service and special Sunrise coverage - 7NEWS Australia

>>18744726 Video: LIVE: Melbourne March | Anzac Day 2023 | OFFICIAL BROADCAST - ABC Australia

>>18744759 Video: ANZAC Day 2023 - "They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old; Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn. At the going down of the sun and in the morning We will remember them."Lest We Forget.

>>18749439 Powerful images as Aussies commemorate Anzac Day - Thousands of Australians across the country and the world are marking the most solemn day on the nation’s calendar. There were emotional scenes with young and old gathered to pay tribute to fallen servicemen and women.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928521

#29 - Part 6

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>18749463 ‘I was 20 going on 16’: Korean War veterans lead Anzac Day march in sombre reflection - For years, Lloyd Knight had nightmares about his time serving as a fighter pilot in the Korean War. “I was 20 going on 16, so it was pretty traumatic, thinking that you’re killing people,” said Knight, who flew 45 missions in Korea in 1953. On Tuesday, the 90-year-old was among the Korean War veterans leading Melbourne’s 2023 Anzac Day march to mark the 70th anniversary of the war’s armistice. Thousands watched veterans, relatives and community groups march down St Kilda Road from Princes Bridge to the Shrine of Remembrance.

>>18749478 ‘Absolutely disgusted’: Sydney statue defaced in Anzac Day protest - A community in Sydney’s north-west is angry after a statue was defaced with red paint ahead of a local Anzac Day dawn service. The Lachlan Macquarie statue in Windsor’s McQuade Park was doused in red paint and handprints alongside the phrases “here stands a mass murderer who ordered the genocide” and “no pride in genocide”. “We are a military community here in the Hawkesbury and to have this done on a day of such national and local significance to me is appalling,” Mayor Sarah McMahon said. Monument Australia, an organisation that records monuments throughout Australia, states on its website the statue was commissioned during the bicentenary celebrations in 1994 of European settlement in the Hawkesbury. “There is controversy around Macquarie’s treatment of Indigenous people,” the website states. “In April 1816, Macquarie ordered soldiers under his command to kill or capture any Aboriginal people they encountered during a military operation aimed at creating a sense of terror. At least 14 men, women and children were brutally killed, some shot, others driven over a cliff.”

>>18749527 Bali bomb mastermind Hambali appears at Guantanamo hearing - The terrorist mastermind behind the 2002 nightclub Bali bombings, which killed 202 people including 88 Australians, has appeared at a preliminary hearing in Guantanamo Bay where prosecutors proposed a formal trial date of early 2025, more than 21 years after his arrest in Thailand. Encep Nurjaman, 59, an Indonesian who is known as Hambali, sat calmly in a military courtroom in Guantanamo Bay during proceedings that became bogged down in legal debate about translator quality and the US government’s sluggish provision of documents.

>>18754977 Video: ‘Girls won’t go home … they’re worried about their uncles’ An Alice Springs school principal has revealed the horrifying extent of the crisis engulfing Indigenous children in central Australia, detailing incidents where children are sometimes returned to school in handcuffs or wearing ankle bracelets and one in which a 12-year-old and his mates led teachers on a wild pursuit through the town in a stolen minibus. In a dramatic video of the minibus chase obtained by The Australian a teacher can be heard screaming: “You little shits … pull over!” as she leans from the window of a pursuing car.

>>18755136 - Anthony Albanese reacts to Joe Biden's re-election bid ahead of US President travelling to Sydney for Quad meeting - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described Joe Biden as "a friend of Australia" as he was quizzed on news of the United States President's re-election bid. Mr Biden announced on Tuesday he would be seeking another four-year term in 2024 "to stand up for democracy" and because it was "time to finish the job". The 80-year-old will visit Australia next month for the third in-person Quad Leaders' Summit, alongside Mr Albanese and the leaders of Japan and India. Mr Albanese told reporters in Sydney Mr Biden "will be a very welcome visitor" when he makes his first trip Down Under as President. "President Biden I regard as a friend and he's certainly a friend of Australia. I don't comment on the internal politics of the United States," the Prime Minister said. "That's a matter for the people of the United States. But can I say this: President Biden will be a very welcome visitor here in Australia."

>>18760659 Federal MP Marion Scrymgour backs ‘safe school’ for Indigenous children in Alice Springs - Northern Territory federal Labor MP Marion Scrymgour has backed moves by Alice Springs principal Gavin Morris to get Indigenous children off the streets and into the classroom by providing safe accommodation for them at school. Ms Scrymgour will meet Dr Morris as early as Saturday to work through issues needed to fast-track the groundbreaking proposal for a residential facility -- part of it secure – for students and says she will push federal Education Minister Jason Clare to consider using funding earmarked for education in Central Australia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928524

#29 - Part 7

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>18760753 ASIO backs federal push to ban Nazi symbolism - Australia's spy agency says a proposed bill outlawing Nazi symbols could help stop extremist radicalisation and recruitment. Federal shadow attorney-general Michaelia Cash introduced the bill last month following a protest in Melbourne which drew neo-Nazis, who used the sieg heil salute. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation says nationalist and racist violent extremists adopt specific imagery and terminology to signal their ideology, build belonging and provoke opponents. ASIO believes extremists are currently more focused on trying to attract new members rather than planning an attack and the legislation would help stop that. "(The bill) would assist law enforcement in early intervention," the agency said in a submission to a parliamentary inquiry.

>>18766061 Heat on ACT DPP Shane Drumgold over Bruce Lehrmann rape trial conduct - Pressure is mounting on ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold over his handling of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial, with the terms of reference of the Sofronoff inquiry widened to include his conduct in the preparation of the proceedings and in the hearings. A key witness in the trial accused Mr Drumgold of threatening and intimidating her as she left the witness box on a morning tea break, and of ignoring her pleas to be recalled to the stand to refute what she alleged was “blatantly false and misleading” evidence by Ms Higgins.

>>18771278 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Tweet: Lest we forget - This week MRF-D Marines and Sailors celebrate Anzac day alongside @DefenceAust - Anzac Day commemorates Australian, New Zealand, and Allied service members for displaying discipline, courage, and self sacrifice in service to their country. #LestWeForget #AnzacDay

>>18771291 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post: LEST WE FORGET - This week, Marines with Marine Rotational Force Darwin alongside Defence Australia Allies, participated in Anzac Day celebrations across the Northern Territory. Anzac Day commemorates current and former Australian, New Zealand, and Allied service members for displaying discipline, courage, and self-sacrifice in service to their country. #lestweforget2023 #anzacday #FreeAndOpenIndoPacific - (U.S. Marine Corps photos by LCpl. Brayden Daniel and Royal Australian Air Force photos by Sgt. Pete Gammie)

>>18775267 Disgraced ex-lord mayor stripped of Order of Australia title - Former Melbourne lord mayor Robert Doyle has had his Order of Australia honour stripped by Governor-General David Hurley. Mr Doyle, who became embroiled in sexual misconduct allegations in late 2017, had his companion of the Order of Australia terminated last month according to a gazette notice published on Friday, 28 April 2023. An independent investigation conducted by Barrister Ian Freckleton reported Mr Doyle touched the breast of councillor Tessa Sullivan in 2017 in the mayoral car. It also upheld a complaint made by another councillor Cathy Oke, who said Mr Doyle inappropriately touched her thigh during a dinner in 2014.

>>18779626 Video: Wild brawl in Alice Springs as Northern Territory police chief Jamie Chalker exits - Shocking scenes of violence have played out on the streets of Alice Springs just as Northern Territory police commissioner Jamie Chalker exits his job, leaving the beleaguered Territory government hunting for a new police chief amid a fresh wave of alcohol-fuelled crime and racial tension. In one incident seen and filmed by The Australian from 2.42am on Saturday, officers were forced to storm a takeaway pizza shop with their Tasers drawn in pursuit of youths who had allegedly armed themselves with a kitchen knife after being ­involved in a wild street brawl with caucasian and Indigenous men. Indigenous senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said the footage was “plain and simple evidence” that the Northern Territory government “has lost complete control of law and order”.

>>18779687 Abbott attacks Voice as Indigenous leader pushes for compromise - Former prime minister Tony Abbott has told a parliamentary inquiry the Voice referendum will leave Australia embittered and divided and should be abandoned, while a key Indigenous leader has urged the government to consider changes to the amendment to shore up support among hesitant voters. A staunch opponent of the Voice, Abbott criticised the degree of public scrutiny given to the proposed Constitutional change as “altogether too abbreviated”, and argued the Voice would divide the country on the basis of ancestry and tie up government decision-making in High Court litigation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928526

#29 - Part 8

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>18779781 Five Eyes: Departing Japanese ambassador flags ambition for nation to join intelligence alliance - Japan is hoping to join the Five Eyes international intelligence alliance as it stands on the front line of strategic challenges facing the region, the country’s top diplomat in Australia has said. Shingo Yamagami is also urging Australia to move urgently on defence, warning of growing security concerns from China in the Indo-Pacific.

>>18779870 Video: Why David Koch wore lipstick live on air on Sunrise - David Koch wore bright red lipstick on Sunrise this morning, all for a good cause. The breakfast TV host, affectionately nicknamed Kochie, rocked the striking colour while interviewing model Jett Kenny, the son of ironman champion Grant Kenny and former Olympian Lisa Curry. When he and his family suffered unimaginable loss three years ago when his sister, Jaimi Kenny, died from mental health issues, Jett vowed to raise awareness and funding for the cause. Now, on May 11, his dream turns to reality as he becomes the inaugural ambassador for the Lip-Stick It campaign, an initiative encouraging Aussie men to wear lipstick on the day to help raise funds for women’s mental health support services.

>>18779932 Video: Sunrise Facebook Post - Kochie joined Jett Kenny in wearing red lipstick as part of a new campaign to raise awareness for women's mental health issues.

>>18779870 Think logically. Ask yourself - is this normal? Conspiracy?

>>18784863 ‘We need help’: Northern Territory community racked by violence as residents claim government has abandoned them - Residents of the remote Northern Territory community of Peppimenarti say they have been forced to flee their homes or endure violence, including stabbings and sexual assaults, amid claims the government has abandoned them. Last week’s planned visit from the NT police minister, Kate Wordern, to discuss the ongoing problems in the community was cancelled when her private plane had to be diverted due to unrest. About 200 people live Peppimenarti, six hours’ drive south of Darwin. Residents are increasingly fearful of violence, and lawyers recently took a claim of racial discrimination to the Australian Human Rights Commission over a lack of police resources in the remote Indigenous community.

>>18784890 Network Ten MasterChef judge Jock Zonfrillo dead at age 46 - Days before his death, Jock Zonfrillo filled his social media accounts with videos sharing his cooking secrets as he prepared pancakes, pasta dishes and homemade pickles. Yet on Monday afternoon his accounts shared news of his shock death to his hundreds of thousands of followers. The Scottish-born chef was found dead at a hotel apartment in Melbourne’s inner north at 2am on Monday after police were called to the Lygon Street, Carlton, address for a welfare check. His death is not being treated as suspicious. Zonfrillo had previously spoken of his battle with drugs, including being a heroin addict at as a teenager. “We were smoking pot behind the bike sheds at 12, we were crumbling up ecstasy tablets and speed and taking them at school … and smoking heroin at 15, 16 when I was an apprentice,” he said in a 2021 TV interview.

>>18784911 Spies seeking new defences for phone bugging and hacking - The Law Council of Australia has criticised proposed reforms to the national security legislation that will give spies extraordinary protections to interfere with facilities and modify telecommunications devices, saying the new laws need to be “reasonable, necessary and proportionate”. The amendment bill, which is currently being considered by the parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security, will grant intelligence agents legal defences to break into a target’s computer, track the geolocation of mobile devices and intercept messages and phone calls without a warrant.

>>18784922 Papua New Guinea backs an Albanese government push to embed Pacific island troops in Australian Defence Force - Papua New Guinea is backing an Albanese government push to embed Pacific island troops in the Australian Defence Force, opening the way for a new era of ­regional military co-operation to counter rising strategic threats. PNG Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko threw his support ­behind the plan as his country ­prepared to host Anthony Albanese, Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi this month for a meeting of Pacific ­island leaders.

>>18784945 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to have presented credentials to President Biden. Just got the happy snaps back. President firing on all cylinders (as he was at the White House Correspondents’ dinner). And Therese looks stunning.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928529

#29 - Part 9

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>18789832 Video: Russian Orthodox choir denounces group of men wearing pro-war Z symbol shirts at Sydney Town Hall event - A Russian Orthodox choir has distanced itself from a group of men who wore "disgusting" pro-Russia symbols to attend a government-sponsored performance in Sydney. Several men wearing shirts with the letter Z - a symbol representing support for Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine - gathered at the front of Sydney Town Hall following a performance of the Russian Orthodox Male Choir. Photos and video of the event have been shared in a social media group run by pro-Putin YouTuber Simeon Boikov, known as "Aussie Cossack". Ukraine's Ambassador to Australia Vasyl Myroshnychenko has condemned the group's attendance as a "disgusting public display". "Z stands for the Russian aggression in Ukraine, rape and murder," he said in a tweet.

>>18789864 How a T-shirt exposed a cultural rift in Sydney - Security agencies are being called to investigate a Russian choir concert, sponsored by a NSW government agency, after men wearing shirts supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine put on a show of force at Sydney’s Town Hall building. The choir is now severing links with ultranationalist groups in Australia. Men in black shirts, bearing the white “Z” symbol showing support for Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, were pictured walking into the performance on Friday night. The group of men posed in front of the stage as the crowd took their seats - one voice in the crowd was disgusted, others appeared supportive. One shook hands with the Russian consul-general.

>>18789901 Video: Albanese meets King, tells Piers Morgan he will pledge allegiance - Anthony Albanese has said he has no issues swearing allegiance to King Charles III during a public oath at this weekend’s historic coronation service and warned republicans that staging a vote on Australia’s future head of state was not imminent. The Australian prime minister met the King during a private audience at Buckingham Palace in London on Tuesday, in what was described as an “insightful and rewarding” meeting, where he reiterated there was an invitation for the royals to visit Australia next year. In an interview with controversial broadcaster Piers Morgan on Britain’s TalkTV, Albanese said he was certain that Australia would become a republic “at some stage in the future” but he preferred not to be a prime minister who “presides over just constitutional debates”.

>>18789935 Video: ‘What a stuttering mess’: Albanese’s response to controversial question slammed by trans-activists - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sparked backlash over his response to a controversial question posed by English journalist Piers Morgan. “What is a woman Prime Minister?” Morgan asked. “An adult female,” Mr Albanese replied instantly. In response, the British journalist proceeded to question: “how difficult was that to answer?” “Not too hard,” Mr Albanese said while slightly shrugging his shoulders and shaking his head. But his response quickly led to intense debate online, with some accusing the Prime Minister of not acknowledging transgender women in his statement. Trans activist and blogger Eleanor Evans said Mr Albanese used the question as an opportunity to “drop anti-trans dogwhistles while umming and ahhing about ‘respect’”.

>>18790019 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to catch up with California Governor @GavinNewsom. CA & (Australia) have a close economic & environmental partnership, & shared interests in climate, tech, & entertainment. 60k Aussies live in CA & 400+ (Australian) businesses active in this economy. You're always welcome down under Governor.

>>18790019 Q Post #2782 - [Example CA] - https://calmatters.org/articles/commentary/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/amp/? - What ‘family’ runs CA? They are all connected. Wealth-Power-Influence - [RIGGED] - The More You Know.... - Q - https://qanon.pub/#2782

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928530

#29 - Part 10

Australian Politics and Society - Part 10

>>18794944 ‘Disappointing’: Monash Council cancels drag queen story time event - Monash City Council has cancelled a drag queen story time event after threats of violence against families, the performer, councillors and staff escalated to include intimidation from neo-Nazis following a tense protest at its offices. The south-eastern council’s meeting in Glen Waverley was derailed last week when almost 200 people attended, many protesting against its sold-out drag queen event planned for children and parents at Oakleigh Library on May 19. Monash chief executive Dr Andi Diamond said the decision to scratch the event was made in consultation with Victoria Police. “It is incredibly disappointing to have to cancel an event designed to celebrate the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia, but we were left with no choice after Victoria Police advised council of the risks. In the end, we were unable to guarantee that we would be able to hold the event safely.”

>>18801113 Note from Washington: Forget Mr Ambassador -call him Kevin Everywhere - A new era of diplomacy began two weeks ago when Kevin Rudd presented his credentials to President Joe Biden at the White House, marking the official start of his term as Australia’s 23rd ambassador to the US. Since then, the former prime minister has wasted no time making his mark. “He’s been really aggressive - in a good way - in terms of reaching up to the Hill,” Democrat Congressman Joe Courtney said after he caught up with Rudd last week, when they discussed the AUKUS submarine pact and his “clear-eyed view of the challenge in the Indo-Pacific”.

>>18801116 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to catch up with @johnpodesta (senior adviser to @POTUS for clean energy innovation & implementation) ahead of President Biden’s visit to Australia in May. We need to maximise (Australia) & (United States) collaboration on climate solutions & the renewable energy transition

>>18824070 Donald J. Trump Truth: Bill Barr was a sloppy, lethargic mess as the Attorney General. He was lazy as hell, and petrified of the Radical Left Democrats, & the fact that they were going to impeach him. I wish they had, which would have meant that he was doing his job, which he wasn’t. Bad on Election Fraud & just about everything else he touched, Sloppy Bill is now a human sound bite, along with Karl Rove, Wacky Peggy “I hate Reagan” Noonan, & Paul Ryan, for Rupert Murdoch & his ANTI-TRUMP (just like 2016!) WSJ, Plus!

>>18824070 Donald J. Trump Truth: Rupert Murdoch, “Worst Republican Speaker ever” Paul Ryan, RINO KARL ROVE, The Wall Street Globalist Journal, and the rapidly disintegrating FoxNews, have gone all out, over the last 3 months, pushing and promoting Ron DeSanctimonious, a man who, without the help and Endorsement of President Donald J. Trump, would now be working at a McDonalds or, at a minimum, be far away from Tallahassee. Anyway, all of this RINO/GLOBALIST push from Election Undenier Murdoch has crushed DeSanctus in the Polls!

>>18835436 Security stoush erupts as Andrew Wilkie in frame for secretive committee - A rare stoush has erupted in parliament’s high-powered intelligence and security committee over a government push that could see whistleblower turned independent MP Andrew Wilkie return to the secretive body. The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Security and Intelligence has only had Labor and Coalition members throughout its history, besides a brief stint when Wilkie served on the committee during the minority Gillard government. The Labor majority on the committee, which receives classified intelligence briefings and oversees agencies such as ASIO and the Office of National Intelligence, is proposing to expand its membership from 11 to 13 MPs, extending membership to politicians outside the two major parties.

>>18835457 US Marine burned by exploding barbecue in Darwin sues US, Australian governments for millions - An ex-US Marine bomb technician set alight in a barbecue explosion while serving in Darwin is suing the governments of Australia and his home country for millions of dollars in damages. Evan James Williamson was on deployment in Darwin in 2019 as an aircraft ordinance technician at an Australian Army base in the Northern Territory city. The 25-year-old has claimed in court documents seen by the ABC that he received 30 per cent burns to his body after attempting to light a barbecue which officials knew had a gas leak.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928532

#29 - Part 11

Australian Politics and Society - Part 11

>>18835473 US Army Chief backs tanks, armoured vehicles amid Australian cuts - The head of the US Army insists tanks and armoured vehicles remain indispensable for modern-day battlefields, amid criticism of the Albanese government for cutting the number of next-generation troop carriers following a top-level military review. “From an army standpoint, I was asked the same question and my response was ‘You don’t need tanks unless you want to win’,” US Army Chief of Staff James McConville told journalists during a media roundtable in Canberra

>>18840513 Two arrested as neo-Nazi group clashes with police at Victorian Parliament - Two people were arrested after neo-Nazis returned to the steps of Victorian Parliament and clashed with police and counter-protesters, almost two months after fascists gatecrashed an anti-trans rights rally on Spring Street. Victoria Police, which deployed more than 200 officers across the city on Saturday, denounced the group of about 25 neo-Nazis who arrived an hour early for a midday “anti-immigration protest”.

>>18840746 The biggest takeaways from the Disability Royal Commission after four years of hearings - "Sexual assaults in the home and by carers. Children being removed from their mothers immediately after birth. Forced sterilisation. Getting paid $2.50 an hour for manual work. These are just some of the many disturbing accounts heard by the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability over the last four and a half years. For many in the disability community, these stories did not come as a surprise - they're well aware of the violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation they face. But with the four-year inquiry wrapping up its final public hearing this week, they want the wider Australian community to know about it, too. And they want everyone to know these situations are not confined to history - they are still happening today." - Nas Campanella and Evan Young - abc.net.au

>>18855229 Video: US special counsel slams FBI probe of Trump-Russia collusion sparked by Alexander Downer - The FBI has been blasted for launching a bombshell investigation of Donald Trump’s Russia links based on Australian intelligence which its lead agent admitted had “nothing to this”. Former Australian foreign affairs minister Alexander Downer inadvertently sparked the extraordinary saga during the 2016 presidential election when he wrote a diplomatic cable about a conversation he had with a junior official in Mr Trump’s campaign. New details of his role have been laid bare in a report by Trump-appointed special counsel John Durham, who spent four years investigating the FBI’s handling of the collusion probe and concluded it was “seriously flawed”.

>>18855354 Video: Ukraine enlists Eurovision stars to lobby Australia for Hawkei fighting vehicles - Ukraine's Eurovision stars Tvorchi have called on Australia for more help to fortify the country's "heart of steel", renewing calls for Australian-made Hawkei fighting vehicles. In a slick new social-media campaign from the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence, the two artists used their profile to make a personal plea to Australia for the additional support.

>>18860427 Joe Biden cancels Australia trip, Quad meeting in doubt - US President Joe Biden has cancelled his upcoming visits to Australia and Papua New Guinea in a blow to Anthony Albanese and to America’s standing in PNG as China looks to expand its influence in the country. Mr Biden was due to arrive in Sydney next week for the Quad leaders summit, which is now in doubt with the offices of both Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese PM Fumio Kishida confirming they were reconsidering their own travel plans. The cancellation comes amid intractable negotiations between Democrats and congressional Republicans over a looming US debt ceiling deadline.

>>18860803 Donald Trump Jr to bring ‘voice of Trumpism’ to Australia - Look out Australia - Donald Trump Jr is coming to town. The son of the 45th president of the United States, who has been described as “the voice of undiluted Trumpism”, said he will be making a three city speaking tour of Australia this July to talk about the “disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture … that has clearly taken hold (in Australia).” Organisers said they expected that the tour, which will run from July 9-11 and hit Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane, would draw “significant” attention due to Mr Trump’s “polarising” reputation and “divisive, anti-politically correct stances”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928535

#29 - Part 12

Australian Politics and Society - Part 12

>>18865983 Video: ‘Kids love drag’: Drag queen icon Shane Zenek on storytime scandal - After weeks of drag queen storytime events being cancelled over abuse and threats one of Australia’s most famous drag queens has issued an emotional tribute to those under attack. Shane Jenek, better known under the stage name Courtney Act told The Project that he recognised it was a difficult time for the “queer community when we are being discussed like this”. “But to love someone of the same gender or express your gender differently means you have to step outside the status quo and understand something of yourself,” he said. “Queer people are hear to save the world, to show we can think differently about the old decaying systems and we can make them better and celebrate that diversity.”

>>18871739 Former AFLW player El Chaston opens up on life-changing breast removal surgery to find their true self - "El Chaston is at peace. With life. With their gender identity. And after years of internal struggle, their body. It’s taken 21 years to get here. But just weeks before their 21st birthday, Chaston became their truest self, undergoing a removal of their breast tissue -- essentially a double mastectomy, or “top surgery” – to reflect their non-binary identity. After years of pain, physical and mental, it “all just washed away”." - Lauren Wood, AFL and AFL Women's reporter for the Herald Sun and CODE Sports - theaustralian.com.au

>>18873902 Should doctors be banned from surgically ‘correcting’ intersex traits in children? - Clitorectomies, phalloplasty and gonadectomies on intersex children will be illegal without an urgent clinical justification, under draft ACT laws. Chief Minister Andrew Barr says doctors have performed inappropriate interventions, and the legislation - the first in Australia - is necessary to protect children from harm. It would ban significant deferrable surgeries affecting a child’s sex characteristics until the intersex child had capacity to consent, with potential penalties of up to $22,000 in fines or two years’ imprisonment.

>>18875192 Kevin Rudd defends Joe Biden over cancelled trip to Australia - US ambassador Kevin Rudd has rejected suggestions Joe Biden’s decision to cancel his trip to Australia and Papua New Guinea is a blow to America’s standing in the region, saying the diplomatic snub is a “very small thing”. “I think we need to take a step back to pull out our smelling salts and say, look, the postponement of a presidential visit in the scheme of all this is quite small,” Dr Rudd told National Public Radio in the US.

>>18875639 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post - Ambassador Caroline Kennedy, 27th U.S. Ambassador to Australia, visits Marine Rotational Force -- Darwin, in the midst of Exercise Crocodile Response at Darwin, Australia, May 17, 2023. During her visit, Ambassador Kennedy experienced a ride in the MV-22B Osprey over the city of Darwin, met with key leaders of Marine Rotational Force Darwin, Defence Australia, and Indonesian National Armed Forces, and received an exercise overview briefing. Exercise Crocodile Response seeks to extend shared interoperability with partners throughout the Indo-Pacific region, increasing efficiencies in responding to Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief. #USEmbassy #FreeandOpenIndoPacific #AlliesandPartners

>>18875704 Video: Obama Praises Australia For Confiscating Citizens’ Guns - Former President Barack Obama praised Australia’s gun confiscation following a mass shooting during an interview that aired Tuesday morning. “We are unique among advanced, developed nations in tolerating, on a routine basis, gun violence in the form of shootings, mass shootings, suicides,” Obama told “CBS This Morning” co-host Nate Burleson. “In Australia, you had one mass shooting 50 years ago and they said, ‘No, we’re not doing that anymore.’ That is normally how you would expect a society to respond when your children are at risk.”

>>18876521 At G7 Summit, Biden apologises to Albanese for scrapping Sydney Quad meeting - US President Joe Biden will ask Congress to empower Australian manufacturers as a domestic source for arms manufacturing, binding the two countries’ defence production together as they confront the growing military might of China. Biden was due to travel to Australia for a Quad meeting in Sydney after the G7, but the summit was cancelled due to the US debt crisis. Biden apologised to Albanese for cancelling his trip to Australia and said negotiations with Republicans were “in their closing stages”. “I’m sorry I’m not taking a plane to Australia,” said Biden as the pair signed a climate and critical minerals’ pact. “All politics is local, but friendship is permanent.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928539

#29 - Part 13

Australian Politics and Society - Part 13

>>18876675 Donald Trump Jr. Tweet: Video: Donald Trump Jr. Live In Australia July 2023 with Turning Point Australia - https://trumplive.com.au

>>18885225 Vacuous Quad joint statement sets off warning bells - "What has made the Australia/US alliance so successful has been a record of practical defence and intelligence co-operation, decisions that put boots on the ground and bullets in the armouries of our defence forces. There was very little of that on display in Albanese’s engagement with Biden. A joint statement of the Quad leaders was released following a short meeting shoe-horned between the end of the G7 and a formal dinner. It’s a disappointing piece of work with a lot of bureaucratic verbiage and distressingly little substance." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

>>18885235 PM goes soft on Russia, China as other leaders step up to the mark in support of Ukraine - "Australia’s attendance at the G7 and Quad leaders meetings in Japan helps Anthony Albanese back home. It portrays him as a respected, influential international leader. But the price of sitting at these tables isn’t smiling and participating in photo opportunities, it’s action - and that’s where the problems can often start. On Ukraine, Australia has moved from an active, front-foot supporter of President Volodymyr Zelensky and his military to a country desperate not to be asked what it has done lately. And on China, the clear Australian government objective is to not create a ripple in the monster’s pond. Its approach is that nothing can be allowed to disturb the glacial lifting of Beijing’s coercive trade restrictions. Even more importantly, nothing must get in the way of the headline: “Albanese meets Xi”." - Michael Shoebridge, director of Strategic Analysis Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18890161 Indian PM Narendra Modi wants ‘next level’ friendship with Australia - Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has declared he wants to take the relationship with Australia to the “next level”, including closer defence and security ties to help ensure an “open and free” Indo-Pacific. Mr Modi said the growing strategic challenges in the region made India’s partnership with Australia more critical than ever.

>>18890184 Controversy dogs Donald Trump Jr’s upcoming tour - Australians are calling for Donald Trump Jr to be banned from the country before his planned speaking tour. Donald Trump’s eldest son will embark on a tour in July with dates in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, presented by Turning Point Australia. However, not all of the “amazing people” in Australia want Mr Trump Jr to enter the country. A petition that calls for him to be banned is gaining traction. At 9.30pm on Monday, an online petition calling for his ban has more than 3400 signatures.

>>18895116 ASIO warns neo-nazi groups are seeking to recruit more members - Right-wing terror threats make up roughly 30 per cent of ASIO's current counter-terror caseload, as the head of the agency warns they are growing in prominence to try and recruit more members. ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess was questioned during a Senate Estimates hearing whether recent public demonstrations signalled a growing threat from Neo-Nazi groups. Mr Burgess suggested while the demonstrations are becoming more brazen, they are primarily aimed at driving recruitment, and do not necessarily indicate a growing terror threat from Neo-Nazi groups.

>>18895125 Video: US Marines join Aussie and Indonesian troops for training in the Northern Territory - The Marine Rotational Force in Darwin has begun its first training for the year - Exercise Crocodile Response. Partnering with the ADF and the Indonesian National Military, the trilateral operation sharpens the groups' skills in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. - ABC News (Australia)

>>18895147 Video: Donald Trump Jr says it is important to fight for freedoms as he calls out radical left ahead of his Australian speaking tour - Donald Trump Jr has urged Australians to fight back against the rise of the radical left, as other nations are "laughing" at the West over its "stupidity". The eldest son of former United States president Donald Trump told Sky News Australia it was important to fight for freedoms and democracy to preserve traditional values of society, which he claimed had been lost in recent years.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928542

#29 - Part 14

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 1

>>18708667 Relations between ACT Police and DPP ‘beset by tension’ over Brittany Higgins’ rape claim - An explosive complaint from the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions about police conduct before and during Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial lit the match that sparked the Board of Inquiry into the capital’s criminal justice systems. Walter Sofronoff KC, who is conducting the inquiry, held the Board’s first public hearing in Canberra this morning where it was revealed that the inquiry was established after DPP Shane Drumgold wrote to ACT Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan on November 1, 2022 alleging his officers had conducted 18 months of “inappropriate interference” in Bruce Lehrmann’s prosecution.

>>18723515 Man charged over threatening to kill Brittany Higgins, David Sharaz and their pet cavoodle - A NSW man has been charged after allegedly threatening to kill Brittany Higgins, her fiance and their pet cavoodle over social media. David William Wonnocot, 49, allegedly told Ms Higgins’ partner David Sharaz he would “kill you both when you least expect it” and that he was planning to “chop Kingston [pet dog] up into little pieces”, according to messages seen by The Australian. Terrorism squad detectives arrested the man at 10am on Wednesday in Tweed Heads on the NSW north coast and charged him with using a carriage service to make threats to kill and menace, harass and offend.

>>18734316 DPP Shane Drumgold complicit with Brittany Higgins’ bid to prejudice case, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer claims - The chief prosecutor in Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial was “complicit” in a bid by Brittany Higgins to prejudice the case against him, according to an extraordinary draft submission to the ACT ­Supreme Court prepared by Sydney barrister Arthur Moses SC. The explosive 36-page document obtained by The Australian sheds new light on developments in the Lehrmann case that have been shrouded in secrecy because of suppression orders imposed by ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum.

>>18766047 Bruce Lehrmann given go-ahead by Federal Court to sue journalists and media outlets over Brittany Higgins interviews - The Federal Court has given the go-ahead to former Liberal Party adviser Bruce Lehrmann's plan to sue media outlets over interviews they conducted with Brittany Higgins. In the interviews - which Mr Lehrmann argues identified him - Ms Higgins alleged she was raped in a parliamentary office in 2019. Mr Lehrmann had to ask the court for permission to lodge a defamation claim against Network Ten and News Life Media because the usual 12-month deadline for these claims had expired. Their stories about Ms Higgins aired and were published in February 2021. He also filed a separate claim against the ABC, which broadcast a speech Ms Higgins gave to the National Press Club in February 2022.

>>18814626 ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold takes the stand on first day of Board of Inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's trial - An inquiry into how criminal justice agencies handled the case against former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has heard journalist Lisa Wilkinson alleged she'd been treated unfairly by the ACT's top prosecutor. There were calls in some media reports for Wilkinson to face criminal proceedings for contempt of court over a speech she gave at the Logie Awards a week before Mr Lehrmann's trial was due to begin. Mr Drumgold accepted today that he did not fully comprehend the potential impact of Wilkinson's speech, should she win. "In hindsight it was not an unlikely hypothetical … I should have paid closer attention at the time," he told the inquiry.

>>18814642 Bruce Lehrmann attends first day of public hearings at Board of Inquiry into ACT’s criminal justice system - Shane Drumgold has told the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system that he is a “prosecutor, not a publicist” over his refusal to publicly clear Lisa Wilkinson of contempt after her Logies acceptance speech delayed Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial. Under intense examination from Counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC, Mr Drumgold conceded he did not give the issue adequate attention and believed Ms Wilkinson had brought up her nomination, in part, to brag about it. “I thought it was more about pointing out she was up for a Logie Award rather than seeking genuine advice,” he said. “In hindsight I should have taken a different approach.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928544

#29 - Part 15

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 2

>>18819307 Day one: The DPP may be in a world of pain over disclosure - "On day one of the Sofronoff inquiry, material before it - and now made public – suggests the ACT Director of Prosecutions may be in a world of pain. In his incendiary November letter to ACT chief police office Neil Gaughan, DPP Shane Drumgold said he wanted a public inquiry into the police handling of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations against Bruce Lehrmann. He’s got that, and so much more than he surely bargained for. Drumgold is central to this inquiry for reasons that will soon become clearer to all Australians. The most serious issues facing Drumgold, by a country mile, concern disclosure. Did the DPP disclose all material he was duty-bound to disclose to Lehrmann’s defence to ensure there was a fair trial?" - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18819337 Bombshell police dossier of Higgins’ ‘inconsistencies’ raises stakes - Shane Drumgold has sensationally claimed investigating police tried to sabotage the rape case against Bruce Lehrmann by heightening Brittany Higgins’ emotional distress in the hope she would be too traumatised to appear as a witness. The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions’ extraordinary attack on the Australian Federal Police officers was made in an 81-page statement to the Sofronoff inquiry, which has made public an explosive police dossier outlining inconsistencies in Brittany Higgins’ statements about her alleged rape. The police briefs, known as the Moller Reports, have been at the heart of the dispute between the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions and the Australian Federal Police

>>18819377 Video: DPP Shane Drumgold worried police opinions would ‘crush’ Brittany Higgins - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold did not want a document containing a senior police officer’s “gratuitous stereotyping” of Brittany Higgins’ credibility to fall into the hands of Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyers because of the “crushing” impact it would have on her. In a dramatic second day of testimony to the Sofronoff inquiry, the Director of Public Prosecutions conceded he may have “unintentionally” misled the ACT Supreme Court over an affidavit seeking to prevent the so-called Moller Report being given to Mr Lehrmann’s defence team.

>>18819394 Sofronoff inquiry: Shane Drumgold accused of withholding crucial documents - In a damning submission to the Sofronoff inquiry, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer has accused chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold of withholding crucial police documents that exposed discrepancies in Brittany Higgins’s rape claims and of alleging political interference and cover-up by Liberal ministers when there was no evidence of it. Mr Whybrow’s 75-page statement to the inquiry claims that Drumgold withheld a key police document from the defence that detailed “many inconsistencies in (Brittany Higgins’) evidence” and should have been disclosed.

>>18824011 Shane Drumgold SC feared conspiracy in Bruce Lehrmann rape case - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold SC has accused police who investigated rape allegations made by Brittany Higgins of “feeding inaccurate information” in a bid to derail the case against Bruce Lehrmann. Mr Drumgold told the Sofronoff inquiry he became concerned because there had been “significant problems” and investigators had “displayed a passionate interest in not proceeding”. Mr Drumgold said he expressed concern to investigators that a second AFP interview would traumatise Ms Higgins.

>>18824025 Senators reject DPP’s suggestion of political conspiracy in Lehrmann trial - Extraordinary allegations by the top prosecutor in the Bruce Lehrmann rape trial that there could have been a political conspiracy to derail the case have been vehemently denied by former Coalition ministers Michaelia Cash and Linda Reynolds. In explosive evidence delivered before an inquiry into the abandoned trial of Lehrmann - a former Liberal Party staffer - ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold SC said a series of “strange events” throughout the case led him to believe there was federal interference in the politically charged case.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928545

#29 - Part 16

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 3

>>18824039 How often can a Director of Public Prosecutions fall short of his duties? - "There is no doubt this was a high-profile, high-pressure investigation and trial. It occurred in the glare of the media, given Higgins’s choice to speak first to the media before proceeding with a formal complaint. It was coloured by activists who saw Higgins as the face of the #metoo movement, forgetting this was an allegation only. There was a vulnerable complainant at the centre of it. Government ministers and their staff were being impugned. Sofronoff will have to determine whether Drumgold, who, by his own admission, has said he did not turn his mind to a range of matters that he should have considered, lost objectivity, meaning he failed to exercise his extraordinary powers in line with his duties. In short, did a form of zealousness that is dangerous to justice set in at some point during this fiasco?" - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18829366 ACT's top prosecutor says he was wrong to suspect federal political interference in Bruce Lehrmann case - In a dramatic about-face, the ACT's top prosecutor, Shane Drumgold has told an inquiry he was mistaken to suspect political interference in the investigation of former Liberal Party adviser Bruce Lehrmann. "Your suspicions about the existence of political interference to prevent the case properly going ahead were mistaken?" inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff asked. "I do accept that," Mr Drumgold replied.

>>18829386 Shane Drumgold’s bizarre CCTV claim claim causes rift with police investigating Brittany Higgins rape allegation - A bizarre allegation of “disappeared” CCTV footage showing Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann at Parliament House on the night of her alleged rape caused a serious rift between the chief prosecutor and police investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation. The Australian understands police were furious that ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold seemed to be suggesting they had deliberately destroyed or deleted video that could have been used in Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial.

>>18829468 Sofronoff inquiry: Lisa Wilkinson refutes DPP claims over Logies speech - TV presenter Lisa Wilkinson has sensationally refuted claims by ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold that he warned her that her Logies speech could result in a delay in Bruce Lehrmann’s upcoming rape trial. Mr Drumgold claimed he told The Project host in a pre-trial conference days before the Logie Awards that the defence team could make a stay application “in the event of publicity”. In a statement to the Sofronoff Inquiry Ms Wilkinson says Mr Drumgold “did not at any time” give her the warning he claimed.

>>18835239 Sofronoff inquiry: ACT DPP Shane Drumgold’s future ‘hangs by a thread’ - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold’s future is hanging by a thread after a week before the Sofronoff inquiry in which he ­admitted serious professional ­errors and did an about-face on claims of a political conspiracy by former Liberal ministers to stop a police investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape claims. On Friday, ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury declined an invitation to express confidence in his Director of Public Prosecutions, after a fifth day of evidence in which Mr Drumgold again conceded “unintentionally” misleading the judge presiding over Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial.

>>18835288 Lehrmann DPP targets media in grilling by Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyer - Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyer has accused the ACT’s top prosecutor, Shane Drumgold, SC, of providing irrational responses to her questions during a lengthy exchange in which he claimed every media outlet misreported Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial. Defamation lawyer Sue Chrysanthou, SC, told an inquiry into authorities’ handling of the case that her client, a high-profile journalist, suffered “utter destruction” at the hands of the media for a Logies speech about Lehrmann’s accuser, Brittany Higgins, that caused the trial to be delayed.

>>18849860 AFP detective inspector ‘traumatised’ at prospect of Bruce Lehrmann rape conviction - One of the lead investigators in the case against Bruce Lehrmann was distressed and morally traumatised by the prospect of the former ministerial staffer being convicted over the rape of Brittany Higgins. Steven Whybrow SC, who represented Mr Lehrmann in the since-aborted trial, said Australian Federal Police Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman told him he believed the former ministerial staffer was innocent, and that if Mr Lehrmann was found guilty he would resign after the jury had retired to deliberate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928546

#29 - Part 17

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 4

>>18849877 The Project ignores the Sofronoff inquiry into the handling of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial - Channel 10’s flagship prime time news and a current affairs program, The Project, has completely ignored the Sofronoff inquiry into the handling of the rape case against Bruce Lehrmann, despite the network being the first media outlet to air an interview with the complainant Brittany Higgins. The weeknight show, predominantly hosted by Sarah Harris and Waleed Aly, last week did not make a single mention of the high-profile inquiry which has dominated newspaper front pages and TV and radio bulletins headlines all over the country since it began last Monday.

>>18855298 ‘Outrageous’: prosecutor’s texts over Higgins leak - A heated text message exchange between Bruce Lehrmann’s defence barrister Steven Whybrow and prosecutor Skye Jerome about revelations published in The Weekend Australian last year have been made public at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system. Mr Whybrow’s communications show that on December 3 last year Ms Jerome contacted him just after 7am demanding to know whether he had leaked the AFP’s investigative review document, now known as the Moller Report, to The Weekend Australian after an article detailing its contents was published that Saturday morning.

>>18855326 Secret court transcript reveals rogue juror ‘deeply sorry’ after causing Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial to be aborted - The confession of the juror who caused Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial to be sensationally aborted late last year can now be revealed, after the Sofronoff Inquiry released the transcript of a secret Supreme Court hearing. During the closed-court hearing on October 27 the juror, who cannot be identified, told Chief Justice McCallum they were “deeply sorry” for taking prohibited material into the jury room.

>>18860707 Did Shane Drumgold succumb to #MeToo zealotry in the Bruce Lehrmann case? - The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions has made some wild claims about political conspiracies between the Morrison government and the Australian Federal Police, between senior ministers and Bruce Lehrmann’s defence team, and between the AFP and defence lawyers. What on earth explains the long list of rash and ill-conceived decisions by the DPP? Was it #MeToo zealotry? Did political pressures ensnare him? Incompetence? Any mix of these possible factors is a dangerous concoction in the hands of a DPP who exercises the power and authority of the state against individual citizens.

>>18865851 DPP Shane Drumgold ‘on leave’ after Lehrmann inquiry evidence - The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold has taken sudden leave from his position after five days of bruising evidence about his handling of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation at the Sofronoff inquiry last week. Mr Drumgold has been replaced as DPP while the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system is underway.

>>18865869 Thanks for the break Shane Drumgold, now please don’t come back - "Shane Drumgold KC has done the right thing. He deserves credit for taking four weeks’ leave as Director of Public Prosecutions of the ACT. He would deserve more credit if he never returned. If he remains the territory’s top prosecutor, there is a risk that criminal justice will suffer. The evidence before Walter Sofronoff’s inquiry into the handling of the Bruce Lehrmann rape trial shows Drumgold sits at the centre of a network of dysfunctional professional relationships." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18875053 ABC to rely on ‘public interest’ defence in Bruce Lehrmann defamation case - The ABC will rely on a new public interest defence in its defamation battle against Bruce Lehrmann, arguing the broadcast of Brittany Higgins’ National Press Club address was of importance to Australians because it concerned the “safety of persons in Parliament House”. The public broadcaster’s defence also argued Mr Lehrmann had no grounds for defamation as he was not named during the broadcast.

>>18875089 Punching up: Will Bruce Lehrmann’s prosecutor survive his latest fight? - Shane Drumgold, SC, has been throwing punches all his life. Those he’s landed have won him gold medals for boxing at the national Masters Games, and the distinction of being the first Indigenous person to become a director of public prosecutions. Last week he threw some haymakers, against politicians, the media, and the police. But now the ACT’s top prosecutor is on the ropes for his part in the abandoned Parliament House rape trial of former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann, which has been described in the inquiry as the most talked about case since Lindy Chamberlain.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928547

#29 - Part 18

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 5

>>18876298 Video: ‘Verdict first, trial later’: rule of law under threat, says Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer Steven Whybrow SC - The presumption of innocence and the right to due process have been dangerously warped by the #MeToo movement, Bruce Lehrmann’s lawyer Steven Whybrow SC has claimed, in his first interview since Mr Lehrmann went on trial over Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations. “This was ‘Alice in Wonderland’. Sentence first or verdict first, trial later,” Mr Whybrow says of the pre-trial publicity around the case.

>>18876460 Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech about Brittany Higgins ‘kept Bruce Lehrmann out of jail’, says lawyer Steven Whybrow - Many people were aghast at Wilkinson’s speech in mid-June 2022. Her public praise of Brittany Higgins, who she had interviewed on The Project, and the implied celebration of the truth of her rape complaint against Lehrmann, within days of the commencement of the trial, would up-end the court process. “If Ms Wilkinson had not said the things she said at the Logies, and the trial judge had not adjourned the trial for three months, I genuinely believe Bruce would have been convicted,” Whybrow says.

>>18885147 Brittany Higgins ‘had to do media as face of #MeToo movement’: Victims advocate told cop - A senior police officer says when he asked that Brittany Higgins stop doing media that could prejudice Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial, Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates told him: “She can’t, Scott - she is the face of the movement now.” In a submission to the Sofronoff inquiry, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller says Ms Yates was “more interested in Ms Higgins pushing the ‘#metoo’ movement than being committed to the upcoming trial”.

>>18885169 DPP Shane Drumgold’s CCTV evidence tampering claim ‘vexatious’ - The senior police officer who led the investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape allegations has slammed Shane Drumgold for suggesting that police deliberately destroyed or deleted CCTV footage of Ms Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann, claiming the chief prosecutor had embarrassingly confused a Four Corners re-enactment with the real thing. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller has in a statement told the Sofronoff inquiry that the inference of corrupt or dishonest behaviour was “vexatious, without any merits and offensive to an extremely committed, hardworking and competent investigation team”.

>>18885211 Video: Pressure to ‘progress’ Bruce Lehrmann rape allegation forced police into medical leave, inquiry told - The senior police officer who oversaw the investigation of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann said that detectives were under so much pressure to progress the matter against their professional beliefs that many went on medical leave. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, who is giving evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system on Monday, told chair Walter Sofronoff KC that on August 5, 2021 Commander Michael Chew told him to have a summons served on Mr Lehrmann due to the “significant pressure” on police to charge the 29-year-old.

>>18890066 Sofronoff inquiry: Police ‘acted hour after boyfriend’s call’ - The police officer in charge of the investigation into Brittany Higgins’s rape allegations has revealed the immense pressure investigators were under to charge Bruce Lehrmann, culminating in a direct phone call from her boyfriend, David Sharaz, to a senior detective threatening to publicly condemn the time being taken. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller gave evidence to the Sofronoff inquiry on Monday that within an hour of Mr Sharaz calling Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, he was given ­instruct­ions to serve a summons on Mr Lehrmann for one count of sexual intercourse without consent.

>>18890091 Shane Drumgold lost objectivity in Bruce Lehrmann rape case, Sofronoff inquiry told - The senior police investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation got the impression that Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold was determined to prosecute the case, “no matter what” and was “dismissive” of investigators’ views, an inquiry has heard. During his second day of evidence at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller said that Mr Drumgold had been verbally expressing his view that there was sufficient evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann “for months” before he had read the brief of evidence.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928549

#29 - Part 19

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 6

>>18895060 Brittany Higgins’ ‘drive to be in media’ made work difficult: top cop - The senior police officer who oversaw the investigation into Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation says the complainant’s “drive to be in the media” made their work “difficult”, and that the case impacted their relationship with the Victims of Crime Commissioner, Heidi Yates. During cross examination of Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, Heidi Yates’s lawyer, Peggy Dwyer, asserted that the Victims of Crime Commissioner was “well within her rights” to become Ms Higgins’ support person and act as a conduit between the complainant and police who were investigating her rape claim against Bruce Lehrmann.

>>18895074 Police officer who led investigation into Brittany Higgins's rape allegation reveals he is sexual assault survivor - The head investigator into Brittany Higgins's allegation that she had been raped has revealed he is a survivor of sexual assault. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller disclosed the information on his third day of giving evidence to an ACT board of inquiry, which is examining the conduct of criminal justice agencies in the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann. Wrapping up his time providing evidence, Superintendent Moller's lawyer, Matt Black, asked him what life experience he brought to his role with ACT police. Superintendent Moller told the inquiry that 45 years ago he was sexually assaulted. "I'm a survivor," he said. "That has driven my desire to make sure [other victims are supported]."

>>18900712 Brittany Higgins ‘naked and asleep’ on sofa not enough to charge Bruce Lehrmann with rape, Sofronoff inquiry told - A police officer investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations has told the Sofronoff inquiry that investigators had not established all three legal requirements necessary to charge Bruce Lehrmann with sexual assault. In evidence to the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system on Thursday, Senior Constable Emma Frizzell rejected a suggestion by Mark Tedeschi KC, who is representing the Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, that the first requirement was satisfied, namely, that there was “corroboration” that sexual intercourse took place.

>>18906031 Case against Bruce Lehrmann ‘very weak’: AFP Commander Michael Chew at Sofronoff inquiry - A high-ranking federal police officer says he believed the case against Bruce Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins was “very weak”, but he directed officers to push ahead because he was concerned that the media was compromising the former staffer’s right to a fair trial. AFP Commander Michael Chew, deputy chief of ACT Police between August 2018 and 2021, said he had had almost daily conversations with detective Superintendent Scott Moller about the strength and weakness of the evidence against Mr Lehrmann.

>>18906057 Media pressure behind timing of Lehrmann charge: police commander - An ACT deputy chief police officer who oversaw the Lehrmann rape investigation said the intense media pressure hanging over the police motivated him to direct the former Coalition staffer be charged in late 2021. Commander Michael Chew told his subordinate Detective Superintendent Scott Moller in early August “let’s just get it served and move on” against the backdrop of increasing public scrutiny and perceived delays in the investigation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928551

#29 - Part 20

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>18670474 Donald Trump winning 2024 US election will not change Aukus plans, Australia’s Albanese says - Australia is confident its agreement with the US to purchase a fleet of nuclear submarines for delivery in the early 2030s will go ahead no matter who wins the 2024 election, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

>>18670521 Anthony Albanese dismisses fears Australia-US ties will suffer if Trump reclaims White House - The AUKUS security pact will remain strong regardless of who ends up in the White House after the 2024 US election, the Prime Minister says. Anthony Albanese said he isn’t concerned for the future of the alliance with the US and the UK, despite the possibility of Donald Trump returning as president following next year’s election.

>>18670549 Anthony Albanese Tweet: (7 January 2021) Democracy is precious and cannot be taken for granted - the violent insurrection in Washington is an assault on the rule of law and democracy. Donald Trump has encouraged this response and must now call on his supporters to stand down.

>>18670549 Video: (7 January 2021) Anthony Albanese blames Donald Trump for US Capitol violence - sbs.com.au

>>18682151 Video: Go inside one of the most powerful warships in the world - CNN's Will Ripley reports exclusively from one of the most powerful warships on the planet, the USS Mississippi, a U.S. nuclear submarine that's on high alert for threats from China.

>>18698843 Ignore the AUKUS hand-wringers, we need these subs for sea-bed battles: Navy chief - The nation’s navy chief has urged Australians to ignore “hand-wringing” doubters of the AUKUS pact, arguing a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines is necessary to fortify Australia against a potential attack on vital undersea cables. In his first interview since Prime Minister Anthony Albanese unveiled the details of the submarine plan last month, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond forcefully rejected claims the vessels could draw Australia into a war over Taiwan or that technological advances will render them obsolete before they arrive.

>>18708612 ‘He diminished his legacy’: Penny Wong, Paul Keating escalate feud - The feud between two of Labor’s most beloved figures has escalated, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong accusing Paul Keating of diminishing his legacy and the former prime minister attacking Wong for speaking in platitudes and lacking policy ambition. In an appearance at the National Press Club, Wong hit out at critics who take “self-satisfied potshots” at the United States, arguing America continues to play an indispensable role in promoting peace and security in the Asia-Pacific as it jostles with rival superpower China for influence. Wong said: “On Mr Keating, what I would say is this: I think in tone and substance he diminished both his legacy and the subject matter.” Keating responded to Wong’s speech by doubling down on his criticisms of both her and the government, saying in a statement: “Never before has a Labor government been so bereft of policy or policy ambition … I never expected more than platitudes from Penny Wong’s press club speech and as it turned out, I was not disappointed.”

>>18714036 China ‘a danger’ to accused AUKUS information seller Alexander Csergo - The Bondi businessman alleged to have sold AUKUS information to Chinese spies could be in danger from “people very interested in him not giving evidence against the Republic of China”, according to a magistrate who ruled that keeping him detained would help ensure his safety. Alexander Csergo was denied bail on the grounds he was a flight risk after a court heard he sold information about the AUKUS security agreement, lithium mining and iron ore to alleged Chinese agents in exchange for envelopes of cash.

>>18719406 Chinese-Australians ‘more wary of AUKUS’, Lowy survey finds - Chinese-Australians are significantly less supportive of the AUKUS alliance and the prospect of Australian military involvement in a US war against China than the broader Australian population, a new survey suggests. The Lowy Institute’s Being Chinese in Australia Poll also reveals a big jump in the proportion of Chinese-Australians expressing concern at “foreign interference” by the US in Australia’s political processes, from 36 per cent in 2021 to 62 per cent in the latest survey. They are less concerned about foreign interference by Beijing, with 54 per cent identifying it a problem compared with 50 per cent in 2021. The poll shows Chinese-Australians have much more confidence in Anthony Albanese (60 per cent) than they did his ­predecessor Scott Morrison (49 per cent), reflecting the Labor Prime Minister’s efforts to dial-down the friction between Canberra and Beijing.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928553

#29 - Part 21

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>18734520 AUKUS has opened a Pandora's box - "Under the painted veil of AUKUS lies the bad precedent set by the nuclear submarine cooperation among the US, the UK and Australia, in which a nuclear weapon state will transfer weapons-grade highly enriched uranium to a nonnuclear weapon state. This constitutes severe nuclear proliferation risks, runs counter to the purposes and goals of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and will create endless troubles." - Ruan Zongze, consul-general of the People's Republic of China in Brisbane, Australia - chinadaily.com.cn

>>18744491 Kiwis join clan as Hipkins backs AUKUS - New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has reassured Australia that his country remains firmly behind AUKUS, endorsing the move to acquire nuclear-powered submarine capabilities as necessary to protect the Indo-Pacific against emerging threats to a global rules-based order.

>>18749496 Retired US admiral who has previously advised Australia on shipbuilding to lead fresh review of navy's warship fleet - A former US admiral, who has previously chaired Australia's expert shipbuilding advisory panel, has been handed a new job leading another review of the navy's warship fleet to ensure it "complements" the new AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines. Retired US Vice Admiral William H Hilarides will conduct the fresh analysis with Australia's former finance secretary Rosemary Huxtable, and former Australian fleet commander, retired Vice-Admiral Stuart Mayer.

>>18749505 US senator warns AUKUS faces ‘significant’ workforce hurdles - The US politician who warned that AUKUS could push America’s shipbuilding yards to breaking point has renewed concerns about the pact, saying that a shortage of skilled workers was still a “significant impediment” to producing enough submarines on time. Democrat senator Jack Reed, who chairs the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee, said that while US shipyards had made some progress in recruiting workers and boosting production lines, it would be “a long, long process” to ensure the industry could keep pace with demand.

>>18760729 Retired US admirals charging Australian taxpayers thousands of dollars per day as defence consultants - A cavalcade of retired senior American military officers have landed high-paying advisory contracts with Australia's Department of Defence. Retired Admiral John Richardson, who headed the US Navy from 2015 to 2019, receives $US5,000 a day as a part-time consultant under a contract with Australia's defence department, struck last year. Details of the arrangements have been disclosed by the Pentagon for the first time, revealing how senior American officers have leveraged their military service over the past decade to obtain work from foreign governments, including in Australia. One of the more intriguing revelations from the Pentagon records is that the former US director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who resigned after Donald Trump's election as president in 2016, was then paid to work for Australia's new Office of National Intelligence. In 2017, the United States Air Force veteran - who had served as under secretary of defence for Intelligence - was appointed as a visiting Distinguished Professor at the Australian National University and addressed the National Press Club in Canberra. According to the newly released Pentagon records, Mr Clapper then in 2018 received an undisclosed sum to work with the Office of National Intelligence (ONI) in Canberra, which was formally established in December of that year. During his 2017 visit Mr Clapper had praised then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull's decision to create ONI as a single point of intelligence coordination which would bring Australia into line with its Five Eyes partners the US and UK.

>>18760729 https://qalerts.pub/?q=clapper - https://qalerts.pub/?q=JC - https://qalerts.pub/?q=J+C

>>18760742 AUKUS safe under Trump, says top US diplomat - One of the United States’ most experienced diplomats says AUKUS is likely to prosper if former president Donald Trump is re-elected. The comments were made to the Delphi Economic Forum, under way in Greece, by Richard Haass, who served four former presidents, including George W. Bush, and former secretary of state Colin Powell, and is now the outgoing head of the non-aligned Council of Foreign Relations. “I don’t think it would be particularly problematic in the sense that one of the, I would argue, contributions of the Trump foreign policy was to introduce a more realistic assessment of China,” Haass said. “And I would think that arrangements like AUKUS are consistent with that … I would think that arrangements like that would be likely to continue and to even prosper regardless [of who is in the Oval Office].”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928554

#29 - Part 22

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 3

>>18771201 Australia’s AUKUS partner red-faced after sub files found in pub’s toilet - Australia’s partner in the $368 billion AUKUS defence deal has been left red-faced after official documents about one of its Astute-class submarines were found in the toilets of a local pub. Files carrying details about HMS Anson were left in the Furness Railway in Cumbria, alongside a Royal Navy lanyard, and showed the inner workings of the nuclear-powered submarine and were used by submariners learning how to isolate and depressurise elements of its system.

>>18771231 TORPED’OH - Secret plans from £1.3billion nuclear submarine found in toilet cubicle at Wetherspoons pub - SECRET nuclear sub plans were found in a toilet cubicle at a Wetherspoons pub. Classified files on £1.3billion HMS Anson had been dropped in The Furness Railway in Barrow, Cumbria. A source said: “It was lucky a Russian spy didn’t find them.” The files showed the inner workings of the torpedo-loaded vessel. Key detail on HMS Anson’s hydraulics, which control torpedo hatches, steering and buoyancy, were in the dossier. It was found in the boozer with a Royal Navy lanyard from the new £1.3bn vessel.

>>18794919 AUKUS as much about jobs as it is national security, Albanese says - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia’s contentious new joint nuclear submarine program with allies Britain and the United States is as much about providing domestic jobs and economic prosperity as it is about national security. Albanese, in the UK ahead of King Charles III’s coronation on Saturday, spoke after joining British Defence Secretary Ben Wallace on a tour of BAE Systems’ shipyard in Cumbria, where nuclear submarines will be built as part of the AUKUS agreement announced earlier this year alongside US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

>>18819462 Canada seeks to join non-nuclear pillar of AUKUS alliance - The Canadian government is seeking to join the non-nuclear component of AUKUS, a security pact between Australia, Britain and the United States that was struck to counter China’s rising military might in the Indo-Pacific region, according to two government sources. Canada was conspicuously absent when AUKUS was first announced in September, 2021. The three member countries are among this country’s closest allies, and like Canada they are members of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing partnership. National security experts feared Canada, a laggard on defence spending, was being excluded from a new “Three Eyes” group. Canada’s reason for wanting to join now is not to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, like Australia, but rather to participate in the second pillar of the AUKUS agreement, the two sources, both senior government officials, said. This non-nuclear part of AUKUS provides for information-sharing and close co-operation on accelerating development of cutting-edge technologies, including undersea defence capabilities, artificial intelligence, quantum technology and hypersonic warfare.

>>18875135 Joe Biden is skipping the Quad meeting over the US debt ceiling - but our underwhelming Defence Strategic Review will not have gone unnoticed, says Peter Jennings - "After promising the biggest defence shake-up in decades, the government’s mocked-up version of a public Defence Strategic Review delivered no new funding in the next four years, yet another review of the navy’s surface fleet and a botched redesign of the army aimed at saving money rather than modernising the force. Washington is constantly assessing whether Australia is really up to the demands that AUKUS co-operation implies. Failing to back our defence rhetoric with funding will have been noted. That type of complacency garners no presidential visits when other priorities are pressing." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

>>18875491 US warship to honour Canberra, cement AUKUS deal - For the first time in its 229 year history, the US Navy will commission one of its warships in a foreign country and name it after our capital Canberra in what will be a significant show of goodwill. The future USS Canberra will join the US fleet after its commissioning in what the US promises will be “a celebration it deserves” before it takes part in ADF exercise Talisman Sabre 2023. The Royal Australian Navy is understood to be preparing a fleet to welcome it to Australia ahead of its unique commissioning.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928557

#29 - Part 23

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 4

>>18875585 USS Canberra Will Join the U.S. Fleet in Australia to Honor Namesake - The future USS Canberra (LCS 30) will join the U.S. Navy active fleet on July 22 with the U.S. Navy’s first international commissioning ceremony at the Royal Australian Navy Fleet Base East in Sydney, Australia. Canberra is the first U.S. Navy warship to be commissioned in an allied country. It is the second U.S. Navy ship to bear the namesake of Canberra. Australian Chief of Navy, Vice Adm. Mark Hammond said this historic event encapsulates both the depth of the historical ties, and modern day partnership between the Royal Australian Navy and the U.S. Navy. “This is a unique demonstration of respect by the U.S. for the Officers and Sailors of the Royal Australian Navy,” said Hammond. “It is an opportunity to reflect on our shared history, and on a friendship forged while fighting side-by-side. On August 9, 1942 the RAN heavy cruiser HMAS Canberra was severely damaged off Guadalcanal (Solomon Islands) while protecting the U.S. Marines fighting ashore. In a surprise attack by a powerful Japanese naval force, Canberra was hit 24 times in less than two minutes and 84 of her crew were killed including Captain Frank Getting”

>>18890139 ASIO agents embedded in Defence to protect AUKUS secrets from foreign spies - ASIO officers are being embedded within the Defence Department to help prevent foreign spies from stealing the highly prized nuclear-powered submarine secrets Australia plans to acquire under the AUKUS pact with the United States and United Kingdom. ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess described AUKUS as a “great shiny example of something that foreign intelligence services would like to get insights on”, raising the importance of ensuring the Australian Defence Force has the best possible security protections as the nuclear-powered submarine plan advances.

#29 - Part 24

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial

>>18682161 Defence chief Angus Campbell warns of 'uncomfortable days' ahead on Afghanistan war crimes action - Australia's Defence chief has declined to say how many senior officers have faced punishment over the damning findings of the Afghanistan war crimes inquiry, but has warned of "uncomfortable days" ahead as more disciplinary action is taken.

>>18744643 Ben Roberts-Smith seeks access to military watchdog’s diary entries - War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith is locked in a legal fight with the Defence Force watchdog over access to diary entries that he alleges may reveal meetings with high-profile investigative journalist Chris Masters, who is at the centre of his defamation case. At a hearing of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Sydney, Roberts-Smith’s lawyers urged Justice Thomas Thawley to overturn a decision blocking his freedom of information request for diary entries belonging to the head of an inquiry into alleged misconduct by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan. The inquiry was conducted by the military watchdog, the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force.

>>18824052 Roberts-Smith still barred from Defence diary entries - Former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith will not receive access to diary and calendar entries showing possible meetings between a war crimes inquiry head and a journalist after nearly six years and multiple appeals. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) upheld that disclosing the diary entries and the calendar entry would involve unreasonable disclosures of personal information and would be contrary to the public interest.

>>18900749 Ben Roberts-Smith war crimes defamation verdict to be delivered on Thursday 1 June - Ben Roberts-Smith, Australia’s most decorated living soldier, will learn next Thursday if he has won his defamation case against three Australian newspapers over allegations he committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The judgment, to be delivered by Justice Anthony Besanko in Sydney on 1 June, will be the culmination of a near five-year legal process, after one of the most dramatic and consequential trials in Australian legal and military history.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928558

#29 - Part 25

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 1

>>18675306 Video: Populist Queensland Australian Senator, Pauline Hansen, gifted a document ‘left behind’ at a Canberra coffee shop by workers for the Voice referendum, details intentions to legislate incredible advantages to Aborigines.

>>18676743 Julian Leeser quits over Liberals’ stance on Indigenous voice to parliament - Julian Leeser has resigned from shadow cabinet and has vowed to campaign Yes ahead of the Indigenous voice referendum, after the Liberal Party opposed a national voice enshrined in the Constitution. In a press conference to announce his resignation, Mr Leeser said he had resigned on a “point of principle” and that he wanted to tell his children he stood up for something he “believed in”.

>>18676748 We must find common ground on the voice - "We must all understand the risk to our country, and the risk to our shared national reconciliation project, if the referendum fails. An all or nothing approach could deliver nothing. That’s why we must find common ground." - Julian Leeser - theaustralian.com.au

>>18676756 The risk for Peter Dutton: will Julian Leeser’s departure have a domino effect? - Julian Leeser’s resignation from the Coalition frontbench has dealt a damaging blow to Peter Dutton and his ability to maintain a unified party position in opposing the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government. The risk for Dutton is whether Leeser’s protest triggers a falling of the dominoes.

>>18682130 Anthony Albanese runs serious risk of dividing instead of uniting the nation, warns former Liberal frontbencher Julian Leeser - Julian Leeser has issued a stark warning to Anthony Albanese that his government risks dividing the country by failing to “seriously engage” with Coalition voters who want to support an Indigenous voice but have concerns over the model, after he quit the opposition frontbench and vowed to back the Yes campaign during the referendum.

>>18682138 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sacrificed nothing in debate of principles - "Leeser has worn much conservative criticism over the voice. He has been accused of being soft, wet, incapable and a closet leftie. But the nastiest barbs were delivered by Anthony Albanese during the past fortnight as the Coalition limped towards its position. Yet Albanese has not shed one drop of blood for the voice. He has not been abused by political allies. He certainly has not sacrificed any advancement. Rather, he has bathed in worship as a future Labor hero. It is Leeser, not Albanese, who has suffered for the courage of his convictions. The Prime Minister might privately admit to shame." - Emeritus professor Greg Cravenl, constitutional lawyer - theaustralian.com.au

>>18682146 Voice to parliament report exposes plenty of flaws, but no real solutions - "The voice is predicated on an assumption of wholesale failure and crisis in Aboriginal communities. It’s true some communities are in crisis, but the suggestion a voice could have prevented problems like those we’ve seen recently in Alice Springs is just plain wrong. A national voice couldn’t respond adequately even in a preventive manner. And, fundamentally, those problems stem from too many Aboriginal people not participating in the real economy. Being so tied to the public purse, the voice won’t have the first clue how to tackle that. The voice as articulated by the Calma-Langton report is fatally flawed: flawed in its claim this is what Aboriginal people want, flawed in its proposed structure and flawed in its approach to representation." - Warren Mundine, businessman and advocate for Indigenous economic participation - theaustralian.com.au

>>18687363 Leeser v Dutton v Albanese: the rival voice models explained - "A referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament will be held by the end of this year. So far, three models been put forward in a bid to achieve Constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We explain them here." - Rosie Lewis - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928559

#29 - Part 26

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 2

>>18693450 AFL great Eddie Betts backs the Voice: ‘It’s a small step, but the right step’ - AFL great Eddie Betts has thrown his support behind an Indigenous Voice to parliament, describing the proposal as a pathway to inclusion and respect in decision-making. The former Carlton and Adelaide Crows small forward and three-time All Australian said he had canvassed a range of views from within First Nations communities before coming to the decision. “It’s a small step, but I think the right step, to have a Voice and be heard.”

>>18698752 Real voices in referendum debate gagged by grand gesture to absolve white guilt - "In the lead-up to this year’s Indigenous voice to parliament referendum, you’ll hear repeatedly that Aboriginal people overwhelmingly want the voice. I don’t believe it. I meet a lot of Aboriginal people from all over the country and I always ask them what they think of the voice. Without fail, the response I hear is they oppose it, don’t understand it, or think it will just cement the monopoly of a small minority who already advise government. The entire concept of the voice is based on a false assumption of the homogeneity of Aboriginal people across the nation, as one race. This is something Indigenous Australians have tried to counter for decades. Now we find a government striving to entrench this in the Constitution. It won’t end well." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine - director of Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies and president of Recognise a Better Way - theaustralian.com.au

>>18703504 ‘Domino effect’: Liberal supporters of the Voice preparing formal Yes campaign - Liberal supporters of the Voice are mobilising to launch the party’s formal Yes campaign once a parliamentary inquiry settles on the wording of the referendum next month, hoping to double support inside the federal party room.

>>18708538 Raging moral coercion on the Indigenous voice to parliament is failing - "For the sake of the nation and its most vulnerable people, Julian Leeser and others attempting to sway Albanese and his Indigenous voice advisers should be encouraged. Australians should be given the opportunity to vote on a referendum they could support safely knowing it would not damage the country. The present strategy built on moral coercion is failing. National polling is clear in its ebbing support for the referendum." - Chris Mitchell - theaustralian.com.au

>>18713968 Jacinta Price promoted to shadow cabinet in Peter Dutton’s reshuffle - Northern Territory Country Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has been promoted to shadow cabinet in the Indigenous Australians portfolio in a reshuffle designed to strengthen Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s campaign against the Voice to parliament.

>>18713975 ‘Dramatic increase’ in false Aboriginality claims: Jacinta Price - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has warned of a “dramatic increase” in people falsely claiming to be Aboriginal because of the newly legislated voice in South Australia, as she leads the Coalition’s No campaign and is charged with delivering better outcomes for Indigenous people.

>>18713995 Video: The rapid rise of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Peter Dutton’s anti-Voice champion - In her first speech in the Senate last July, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price railed against what she described as pointless virtue signalling, saying nothing would help Indigenous children facing the “nightmare of terror” posed by sexual violence. Pitching the Voice as a vain proposal that would drive a wedge between black and white Australia, the firebrand new senator in a traditional Warlpiri headdress made the Canberra establishment sit up and take notice of her sharp rhetoric. Fast-forward 10 months and Price, still loudly prosecuting the same arguments, has vaulted to become one of the most prominent Indigenous figures in the country as the opposition’s Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman and a leader of the campaign to defeat the Voice referendum.

>>18714015 Indigenous voice to parliament yes vote is the first step to true equality of citizenship - "The absence of any protection of citizenship rights has affected the quality of Australian citizenship for all Australians and most profoundly for Indigenous Australians. Constitutional change to ensure the voices of Indigenous Australians are directly heard on laws affecting them is not only important for the recognition of First Nations Australians but necessary to enable equality of Australian citizenship. A Yes vote in the forthcoming referendum is the first step towards a commitment to an equality of Australian citizenship and should be supported by all Australians no matter what their political leanings." - Kim Rubenstein, professor in the faculty of business, government and law at the University of Canberra - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928562

#29 - Part 27

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 3

>>18719335 Video: Voice will ‘divide our family’: Price and husband front ‘No’ campaign ad - The Coalition’s newly appointed Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the Voice to parliament will divide her family, in a new campaign funded by right-wing lobby group Advance Australia launching on Wednesday night. Price and her Scottish-Australian husband Colin Lillie appear in a video, a portion of which was released on Wednesday by a new campaign outfit called Fair Australia, which describes itself as “a grassroots movement of Australians” but is run and paid for by Advance Australia. “Later this year they want to establish a so-called Voice to parliament. This is a really big deal,” Price says in the advertisement. “The Constitution is the rule book for governing the country, and they want the rules to change. This will divide us.”

>>18719348 Video: One, Together - Full Documentary - Warlpiri woman and mum of four, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price shares her story of being part of a blended family in Australia and her lived experience in remote Indigenous communities. "What's important to me is that we don't divide ourselves along the lines of race in this country. I don't want my family to be divided by race because we are a family of human beings and that's the bottom line." - www.fairaustralia.com.au - #VoteNOAustralia

>>18719352 So many clashing voices, so little of worth achieved, writes Nyunggai Warren Mundine - "This year Australians will vote at a referendum for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice. But the Albanese government refuses to discuss the details, pointing us to the 2021 Indigenous Voice Co-design Process report by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton. At 270 pages long the report makes for impenetrable reading. All for a supposedly advisory body with two dozen members. No other Australian government body or agency takes this long to explain. That’s because the voice is not an advisory body. It is a vast, expensive new bureaucracy that will interface at every level of government." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine, director of Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies, and president of Recognise a Better Way - theaustralian.com.au

>>18719359 Noel Pearson says Queensland must lead the push for Yes in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum - Noel Pearson says Queensland must be at the forefront of the Yes campaign for the referendum as he appealed to the state Liberal National Party to support the Indigenous voice to parliament. “I am very confident we are going to get five of the six states, I just wouldn’t like my home state to be the exception. I really want the government and opposition to really think seriously about how we can make Queenslanders vote for the right thing.”

>>18723374 Torment of the past demands voice for future, says Thomas Mayo - "For most Indigenous Australians, we seek constitutional recognition because of the love we have for our children and our country. After all, if this referendum fails, it will have detrimental impacts on the health and wellbeing of our families and communities for generations. If it succeeds, we know they will enjoy better lives. We must beat the tactics of confusion being deployed by the No campaign. We should share with fellow Australians that at this referendum we will be considering a simple proposition: to recognise Indigenous Australians by accepting a generous offer to share their history and culture as part of who we are as a nation, and to do it in a way that provides the practical means to improve outcomes in Indigenous communities." - Thomas Mayo - Kaurareg Aboriginal and Kalkalgal, Erubamle Torres Strait Islander man, and board member of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928564

#29 - Part 28

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 4

>>18723387 OPINION: The Voice, as proposed, is flawed and insulting to First Nations - "I am Australian. I’m a member of the Bundjalung First Nation of Australia, from my father’s side, and the Gumbaynggirr and Yuin First Nations of Australia from my mother’s side. And I oppose the Voice to parliament. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s proposed new chapter of the Constitution is stated to be “in recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia”. This is not recognition of Australia’s First Nations. All it does is recognise Aboriginal people as a homogenous race. Race can sometimes be convenient descriptor. But it’s a flawed, and insulting, basis for recognising Australia’s First Peoples in the Constitution. And history shows it’s a fraught basis on which to differentiate people’s rights. Race and nationhood are different. Don’t believe the spin. The Voice is not constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Nations. It will not - and cannot - represent First Nations and will more than likely be used as a tool to undermine them." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine, Activist and former politician - theage.com.au

>>18723399 Video: Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Queensland Indigenous population key to No campaign - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Queensland’s large Indigenous population could be key to carrying the state to a No vote in the voice to parliament referendum. Days after being elevated to Peter Dutton’s front bench, the Northern Territory senator visited Queensland parliament on Wednesday to meet with Liberal National MPs, whose party is yet to officially adopt a position on the voice. Queensland is shaping up as a crucial battleground in the referendum after an exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian this month showed it was the only state without majority support for enshrining a voice in the Constitution, with 49 per cent in favour and 43 per cent in the No camp.

>>18723408 Central Land Council attacks Jacinta Price over her commentary on Alice Springs crisis and stance on voice - The land council representing Aboriginal people of Alice Springs and surrounding communities has attacked opposition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price over her commentary on the Alice Springs crisis and her stance on the voice, saying: “she needs to stop pretending we are her people”. Yuendumu man Warren Williams, deputy chair of the council of 90 elected Aboriginal women and men from central Australia, was highly critical of the Alice Springs Senator in a media statement issued by the Central Land Council on Thursday. “We are tired of her playing politics with grass roots organisations our old people built have built to advocate for our rights and interests,” Mr Williams said. “Her people are the non-Aboriginal conservatives and the Canberra elite to which she wants to belong.”

>>18723421 Indigenous voice 'will paralyse parliament' - A former Supreme Court judge predicts the Indigenous voice will paralyse the Australian parliament and "in many cases the approval of the advisory body will have to be obtained before a bill can be enacted". Nicholas Hasluck KC, who retired from the West Australian Supreme Court in 2010, describes the proposal to entrench the Indigenous voice in the constitution as contrary to democratic ideals. In his written submission to the joint select committee inquiry into the voice, Mr Hasluck criticises one of the justifications offered for the advisory body offered by Anthony Albanese. Mr Albanese has said consulting Indigenous people about matters that affect them is good manners. "To say, as some have said in recent months, that the voice should be enshrined simply as a matter of ‘good manners’ is a shallow and misleading line of argument," Mr Hasluck writes in his submission to the voice Senate inquiry. "An emotive plea of this kind seeks to shame people into voting for the voice. A profound change to the structure of government by constitutional amendments should only be made in response to well reasoned debate on both sides of the question."

>>18728969 Video: Majority of voters in Queensland and South Australia oppose Voice to Parliament as support falls across all jurisdictions, according to Roy Morgan poll - Support for the Voice to Parliament has fallen across all six Australian states, with only one jurisdiction showing a majority would vote "Yes" in the referendum. New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania recorded single to double figure falls, according to the Roy Morgan poll. The largest drop in support was in Tasmania, with backing for the independent advisory body falling a massive 30 points down to 38 per cent.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928566

#29 - Part 29

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 5

>>18728985 Voice to Parliament would be an 'enhancement' to constitution, according to solicitor-general - The government’s top lawyer insists the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament would "enhance" Australia's system of government, arguing he does not believe it would "pose any threat" to the nation's parliamentary democracy. Solicitor-general Stephen Donaghue KC has also dismissed suggestions the creation of the advisory body, enshrined in the constitution, would lead to a deluge of legal challenges. The federal opposition has been demanding the solicitor-general’s advice to cabinet, provided during the drafting process, be published. That advice has not been provided to the committee.

>>18734240 Indigenous voice to parliament is solution looking for problem to solve and will only divide - "This year Australians will vote to introduce a constitutionally ­enshrined, vast and expensive new bureaucracy called the Indigenous voice to parliament. The voice will interface with every level of the commonwealth government apparatus, with every decision and policy subject to delay and/or judicial challenge if it is not paid proper homage. It’s inherently undemocratic for parliament, ministers, the public service and every government agency to be beholden to an unelected body. But even within the Aboriginal population, the voice won’t be a democratic instrument. Its members won’t be elected; but chosen by committee. The voice is a solution looking for a problem, demanded by a minority of Aboriginal elites. It will not help communities. And it will not reconcile our nation. It may well help tear those communities and our nation apart." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine, director of Indigenous Forum, Centre for Independent Studies, and president of Recognise a Better Way - theaustralian.com.au

>>18744291 Lidia Thorpe’s mum and allies in Victorian Voice bid - Lidia Thorpe’s mother, cousins and political allies are angling for control of the Victorian body that will act as the state’s Indigenous Voice and interact with a national Voice to parliament, generating unrest among some Victorian Indigenous leaders who fear the maverick senator’s influence.

>>18754991 Indigenous voice to parliament inquiry submissions are more petition than sound legal analysis - Over the next few weeks I plan to bring you some submissions from the joint parliamentary inquiry into the Indigenous voice to parliament proposal. The first point is that not all submissions are equal. Let’s start with the dumbest. For the crib note version of what has gone wrong with universities, read the submissions from the University of Sydney law school and Adelaide Law School. Each is a one-pager saying they are allies of the voice, describing it as legally sound and signed by a gaggle of academics. These are petitions, not submissions. This is groupthink meets sandstone arrogance: legal academics with nothing of substance to say, offering no legal analysis. It’s apparently enough that they say Yes. Seriously, what is the point of these law schools? - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18755008 Top jurist Terence Cole slams Albanese government’s Voice proposal - One of Australia’s leading jurists has blasted the Albanese government’s proposed Voice to Parliament referendum, saying it is “wrong in principle” and will “split the Australian people permanently into two groups based on race.” Terence Cole, a former judge on the NSW Court of Appeals who presided over two royal commissions, made the claims in a bombshell submission to a joint parliamentary committee on the Voice. In the submission Mr Cole noted that the voice is just one part of the broader program of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which calls for “treaty” and “truth telling” as well as a Voice to parliament, and which the Albanese government has accepted in its entirety. “The voice is critical to the objectives made clear in the Uluru Statement … that Aboriginals wish to establish … sovereignty over Australian territory, ownership of Australian land and surrounding waters … monetary and other compensation … (and) truth telling,” he wrote. “To achieve (these) objectives, it is necessary to split the Australian people permanently into two groups based solely on race … this is wrong in principle.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928569

#29 - Part 30

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 6

>>18760676 Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaign launches advertising blitz as support softens - The Yes campaign will launch an advertising blitz this week amid falling support for Anthony Albanese’s referendum to constitutionally enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament. SEC Newgate Mood of the Nation tracking polling reveals a further softening in voter support for a voice to parliament, dropping from a 59 per cent high ahead of last year’s May federal election to 52 per cent this month. While the survey of 1200 voters, conducted between April 13 and 18, shows a slim majority in favour of the voice, there has been a hardening in opposition to the Indigenous advisory body. The poll, which did not reference the constitutional amendment wording that a voice advisory body would also make representations to the executive government, found opposition against the referendum had risen from 16 to 27 per cent.

>>18760683 Video: Join Us - ‘Join Us’ is just the first step in a many months-long conversation with Australians between now and the referendum, which will include more national commercials and talking to everyday Australians about the opportunity to be part of a successful referendum. - www.yes23.com.au/joinus - #yes23

>>18760697 Indigenous voice referendum results may not be known on voting day, AEC commissioner warns - The result of the Indigenous voice referendum may not be known on voting day or for some time afterward, with the electoral commissioner warning people “may be disappointed” if they expect a definitive answer on the night. The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is also concerned about dangerous mis- and disinformation circulating ahead of the referendum, already stamping out voting-related conspiracy theories imported from the US. Polling workers will also get more training and security after what the commissioner, Tom Rogers, called “disturbing” incidents at recent elections, including staff being filmed and accused of stealing ballot papers, and online threats of violence. The AEC is still debunking claims about Dominion voting machines, an electoral technology at the centre of conspiracy theories around the 2020 US election, but which Australia has never used.

>>18766026 Barrister Clive Steirn won’t have a bar of Indigenous voice to parliament support - A barrister has fired criticism at the NSW Bar Association for issuing its public support for the proposed Indigenous voice model and lambasted the Bar president for speaking on behalf of members without consultation, claiming the voice could open the floodgates to High Court challenges. Clive Steirn SC has joined barrister Louise Clegg in lashing the Bar council for essentially claiming it has a mandate from its members to support the voice in the absence of debate.

>>18770882 Pearson slams ‘weak’ Dutton, former Liberal PMs on Indigenous recognition - Voice architect Noel Pearson has delivered a stinging condemnation of contemporary Coalition leaders, accusing them of being too weak to embrace the task of changing the Constitution to acknowledge Indigenous Australians. Lamenting what he claimed were lies stemming from the No campaign, Pearson said Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who is campaigning against the Voice, was defined by his right-leaning party room. “He’s too weak to have shifted them and shown the necessary leadership to move his party out of the rut that it’s in,” Pearson said.

>>18775333 Victorian Coalition frontbenchers speak out in push for free vote on Voice - Senior state Coalition MPs will push for a free vote on the Indigenous Voice to parliament, putting them at odds with their federal counterparts who will campaign against constitutional change. The Victorian parliamentary Liberal Party hasn’t reached a formal position on the Voice to parliament, but leader John Pesutto has so far refused to back federal leader Peter Dutton’s opposition to a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous Voice.

>>18775344 Yes vote for the Voice is leading in every state and territory: Poll - The Yes campaign to enshrine an Indigenous Voice within Australia’s constitution is ahead in every state and territory, the most comprehensive poll conducted on the proposal has revealed, placing it on course to deliver the first referendum to pass in four decades. The first dedicated state-by-state poll on the Voice to parliament has recorded the Yes vote on 51 per cent across the nation, while 34 per cent said they would vote No and 15 per cent were undecided. It would also reach the critical benchmark of support in a majority of states, while the Yes side was ahead in Queensland and Western Australia but fell short of 50 per cent support. The YouGov poll of 15,060 Australians was commissioned by the group behind the Uluru Statement from the Heart and is the largest poll conducted on the upcoming referendum.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928570

#29 - Part 31

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 7

>>18779729 ‘Very important issue’: Victorian Liberals granted free vote on Voice, at odds with federal counterparts - Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto will allow all his MPs a free vote on the Indigenous Voice to federal parliament, saying his members value the freedom to make their own choices on significant national issues. Pesutto confirmed on Monday afternoon that his shadow cabinet had agreed to give MPs the right to campaign and vote Yes or No, rather than forcing them into a party position. This puts the state Coalition at odds with federal leader Peter Dutton, who has forced his frontbench to campaign against constitutional change.

>>18779763 Brisbane Labour Day march 2023: Overwhelming support for Voice - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, visiting Brisbane, recommitted his government to the implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, starting with the Voice. “We will give Australians the opportunity to vote yes for a better future in the last quarter of this year.”

>>18784833 Splinter group emerges among Liberals refusing to reveal how they will vote in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum - A splinter group of Liberal MPs is refusing to declare its position on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, with five confirming they will not participate in either the Yes or the No campaign. In a sign of deepening division in the party, analysis by The Australian reveals at least 10 per cent of Liberal backbenchers, shadow ministers and shadow assistant ministers will abstain from the referendum campaign trail, while 12 per cent are refusing to say how they’ll vote on polling day.

>>18784850 Cricket Australia set to brief Pat Cummins, Meg Lanning and other senior stars ahead of ‘The Voice’ referendum - Pat Cummins, Meg Lanning and other senior Australian cricketers are set to be given a special briefing about The Voice before they head off for the Ashes. Cricket Australia plans to come out publicly with a position on The Voice in the coming weeks and wishes to consult with its stars beforehand and provide an opportunity for players to ask questions.

>>18789757 Scars of rejection will run deep if the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum fails, says historian Henry Reynolds - "If the referendum is lost, a new, younger generation may return to the streets with campaigns of direct action. Others could well conclude that their campaign for self-determination and treaties will gather strength by taking the struggle offshore to Geneva and New York, where they would find that Australia had few friends in the erstwhile colonial world." - Henry Reynolds, historian of Australia’s frontier conflict - theaustralian.com.au

>>18789782 Video: Indigenous voice to parliament Yes ad campaign is ‘misleading’ claims Advance Australia - The Yes campaign’s video advertisement urging viewers to vote in favour of constitutional recognition of an Indigenous voice to parliament is “misleading”, right-leaning ­activist group Advance Australia has claimed. Executive Director Matthew Sheahan said the advertisement’s claim that a Yes vote at the referendum would give Australians “a real say” was misleading because “there is no guarantee what a future voice will make representations on and how the parliament of the day will respond”.

>>18789803 West Coast Eagles join the Collingwood Magpies in supporting Voice to Parliament - The West Coast Eagles have become the latest AFL club to come out in support of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament. The Perth-based team issued a statement on Tuesday revealing its backing for the constitutional change that Australians will vote on between October and December. West Coast's decision was made public about a month after the Collingwood Magpies confirmed its board was in support of the Voice.

>>18794875 Victorian Bar’s Indigenous voice to parliament comment ‘exceeds its power’ - A Victorian barrister has told the state Bar Council it would “exceed its powers” if it made a public statement on the Indigenous voice to parliament, as rumours swirl that the institution is tilting in favour of supporting the proposed model. Former Victorian Bar councillor Lana Collaris, who is adamant the state Bar would undermine its independence if it announced a position on the voice, also labelled Bar president Sam Hay “weak” for failing to state his personal view on the matter.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928574

#29 - Part 32

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 8

>>18794901 Video: Liberal MP accused of ignoring Aboriginal voices at community forum on the Voice - An Aboriginal elder claims she and other Indigenous people were ignored at a community forum on the Voice to parliament hosted by Liberal MP for Hughes Jenny Ware, and featuring former prime minister Tony Abbott and journalist Joe Hildebrand as its main speakers. The panel event, streamed live on Ware’s official Facebook page, was drawing to a close after Abbott and Hildebrand had debated for an hour and half and fielded four questions from the audience when an Indigenous man interrupted to say an Aboriginal perspective was needed. The man’s intervention was preceded by another audience member, who is associated with the Yes campaign, interjecting during Ware’s final remarks to say: “Can we please hear from a First Nations person before we go?” Ware responded: “We simply do not have the time.” As Ware pressed ahead, a man who identified himself as Dhungutti and Gumbaynggirr from the NSW mid-north coast, walked onto the stage and took over the lectern, saying: “Maybe you should hear it from an Aboriginal side.”

>>18819428 Bar councillors vote on voice ‘conflict of interest’ - The Victorian Bar Council will vote on whether three councillors who signed a motion urging the Bar issue its public support for the Indigenous voice should remove themselves from any discussion on the referendum moving forward. The Victorian Bar Council vice-president Elizabeth Bennett SC, councillor Colin Mandy SC and councillor Fiona Livingston-Clark put their names to a motion proposing the Bar back Anthony Albanese’s proposed voice model, as the NSW Bar Association have done. However, some Bar members believe that by attaching their names to the motion, the three councillors have compromised their independence.

>>18819440 Victorian Law Institute vows to back the Indigenous voice to parliament - The Law Institute of Victoria has vowed to back the Indigenous voice despite conceding some of its members may hold an opposing view. Its support comes as infighting persists at the Victorian Bar Association over the issue, and all 2200 members gear up to vote on whether the association should release a unified position. The Law Institute of Victoria, which represents 18,000 lawyers across the state, released a media statement on Tuesday declaring its “public support to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice in the Constitution”. “We believe that establishing a constitutionally enshrined Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice is a long-overdue constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Nations peoples,” Institute President Tania Wolff said.

>>18829336 Should you vote for the voice? - "It is clear that the voice model was designed in a rush and not cognisant of the complexity that exists in Aboriginal affairs. The Voice would change the nature of our democracy that is predicated on the value of equality of all citizens. It threatens to reintroduce segregation to Australian society via the Constitution and the parliament. We have already seen the division this model has caused, the race hate that has emerged weirdly from the proponents of the YES vote when they accuse NO vote proponents of racism." - Victoria Grieves Williams is Aboriginal, Warraimaay from the midnorth coast of NSW, and an historian - theaustralian.com.au

>>18829360 Key 'No' camps merge to form Australians for Unity to strengthen referendum campaign - The two campaigns pushing for a No vote to the forthcoming Voice to Parliament referendum have merged, in a move that is aimed at unifying their message and strengthening their campaign. Until now, the two main groups were the Warren Mundine-led Recognise a Better Way, and Fair Australia, the group with the backing of shadow Indigenous Australians Minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. The joint campaign will be called 'Australians for Unity', and Senator Nampijinpa Price and Mr Mundine will be campaign spokespeople.

>>18835099 Altered Indigenous voice to parliament out of question, says inquiry - Australians will be asked to vote for an Indigenous voice to parliament and “executive government” after a Labor-dominated parliamentary committee endorsed Anthony Albanese’s proposed constitutional amendment without change, deepening the political battle over the referendum process. The Liberals and Nationals, who made up less than a third of committee members, issued dissenting reports attacking as insufficient the six-week time frame given to the inquiry.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928576

#29 - Part 33

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 9

>>18835159 Video: Google AI chatbot Bard thinks Lidia Thorpe is ‘a role model’, backs an Indigenous voice to parliament and labels Peter Dutton ‘controversial’ Google’s new AI chatbot backs the Indigenous voice to parliament as a “positive step”, praises Anthony Albanese as a “man of the people”, and labels Peter Dutton and Scott Morrison as “controversial”, sparking concerns over political bias and “propaganda” from Big Tech. Bard is Google’s answer to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which launched in November last year and reportedly set off a “code red” within the search giant. The service, still in an experimental state, was made publicly available in 180 countries. While Google says its chatbot does not set out to have political opinions, experts said the digital titan had rushed its chatbot, the new AI system “confidently declares untruths and opinions” and chatbots need more regulation.

>>18840240 Voice myths debunked: Thomas Mayo - "I have recently seen a full-page advertisement filled with false statements under the guise of a minor political party. The advertisement, in big bold letters stated, “It’s OK to say NO”. You can expect more advertisements like it. And some politicians, as usual, are seeking to make this constitutional moment about them. But the referendum is about us, as Australians, not the politicians. I decided to write this article for your reference, to debunk the false statements in the “No” campaign advertisement." - Thomas Mayo, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander man, national Indigenous officer of the Maritime Union of Australia, and director on the board of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition.

>>18840266 Australian sport ‘should stay out of the voice debate’ urges former prime minister John Howard - Former prime minister and renowned cricket tragic John Howard is urging sporting organisations to keep politics out of sport and not publicly declare a position on the referendum campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament. “Sporting bodies should not get involved in partisan political debates. They should stay out of the voice debate. For a national or state body to take a position on the voice is potentially divisive and disturbing to fans and followers,” Mr Howard told The Weekend Australian.

>>18840422 Google quietly changes progressive AI chatbot Bard on Indigenous voice to parliament, Coalition calls on government response - Following accusations of overt political bias, Google has quietly changed its new AI chatbot to stonewall questions that mention the Indigenous voice to parliament, after the tech giant was heavily criticised for saying the voice would be “a valuable addition to our democracy”. On Friday 12 May, The Australian’s front-page story quoted Bard on Thursday as saying the voice was a “positive step towards reconciliation between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the rest of Australia. I believe that the voice to parliament would be a valuable addition to our democracy,” it said. But on Friday, Bard’s opinions had mysteriously vanished and instead it simply replied: “I’m a language model and don’t have the capacity to help with that.”

>>18849787 Victorian Bar: ‘We backed same-sex marriage, we can back the voice’ - The Victorian Bar has firm ground to support the Indigenous voice parliament because it once supported same-sex marriage in the face of the plebiscite, a leaked memorandum urging Bar members to vote Yes in a poll deciding if the association publicly backs the voice suggests. The 20-page memorandum, sent to all 2200 Bar members, comes as the association gears up for a poll on whether or not it should support the Indigenous voice, and opposing camps start work to convince members to vote their way.

>>18849819 Treaty settlements could cost hundreds of millions and depend on size of massacres - Treaty deals between Aboriginal Australians and state governments are likely to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars apiece and factor in the number of Indigenous people killed in historic local massacres, as Queensland looks to New Zealand and Canadian agreements to guide its new reconciliation laws. Days after passing a treaty process touted as “setting the standard” in Indigenous-government relations, Queensland cabinet minister Craig Crawford told The Australian the amount of land taken by British colonial forces and the impact of massacres could be key considerations in formulating the value of each deal made with local Aboriginal groups.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928580

#29 - Part 34

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 10

>>18855233 Indigenous treaty negotiations to include mine veto in Queensland - Indigenous corporations will push for the power to veto mines in environmentally and culturally sensitive areas as part of landmark treaty negotiations with the Queensland government. Joshua Gorringe, the general manager of the Mithaka Aboriginal Corporation in western Queensland, says a priority for a future Mithaka treaty with the state would be the right to block resources projects on their traditional land.

>>18855259 AFL Commission set to work on league’s position on Voice to Parliament - The Australian Football League has asked all clubs to form a position on the Voice and has also liaised with its National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Council. The league seems likely to support the Voice given the large number of Indigenous players who bless the game, with AFL champion Eddie Betts already throwing his support behind a yes vote for the referendum.

>>18855269 Richmond FC Tweet: Empowering and listening to Indigenous voices has made Richmond a better Club. We are richer for it, a more connected and culturally safe Club. It has strengthened us on and off the field. We recognise and respect people's right to form their own views, but the lived experience of our Football Club means we fully support the proposed Voice to Parliament and a Yes vote.

>>18860464 Voice support slides again as debate rages over model - Support for the Indigenous Voice has tumbled from 58 to 53 per cent over the past month in the crucial “yes or no” question that will decide a referendum on the issue later this year, deepening the risk of defeat after furious disputes on the change. The sharp fall in support includes pivotal shifts against the Voice in big states such as Queensland and volatile swings in smaller states that challenge assumptions that Australians will cast a majority vote for the contentious change to the Constitution.

>>18860464 Voice support slides again as debate rages over model - Support for the Indigenous Voice has tumbled from 58 to 53 per cent over the past month in the crucial “yes or no” question that will decide a referendum on the issue later this year, deepening the risk of defeat after furious disputes on the change. The sharp fall in support includes pivotal shifts against the Voice in big states such as Queensland and volatile swings in smaller states that challenge assumptions that Australians will cast a majority vote for the contentious change to the Constitution.

>>18860523 US-style treaties in Australia will only entrench racial turmoil - "Treaties with Indigenous nations are being explored by every state government, often trained in the task by academics. But what model does this activism follow? What “settler” nation has a reconciliation plan worth emulating? Progressive activists variously advocate a hybrid of Canada, New Zealand and South Africa. None is particularly suited to Australian conditions. People of colour have endured horrific prejudice in the respective histories of Australia and the US, from massacres to slavery. But this white-on-black narrative - once vital - is increasingly a caricature that elides the more widespread problem of intra-racial crime. In US cities and Australian outback communities, black-on-black violence now dwarfs that which may have a racist, “white supremacist” motivation." - Timothy J Lynch, professor of American politics at the University of Melbourne - theaustralian.com.au

>>18860597 Indigenous man condemns voice no campaign for claiming he is Vincent Lingiari’s grandson - An Indigenous man incorrectly identified by the voice referendum no campaign as “Vincent Lingiari’s grandson” says he is not related to the land rights leader and feels “humiliated” by the way his image has been used. No voice leader Warren Mundine has stood by his campaign’s claims, claiming that Stewart Lingiari had described himself as Vincent’s grandson in a “cultural kinship” sense, rather than directly.

>>18860644 ‘Why be divisive?’ Rugby wrestles with the Voice to parliament - Rugby Australia is facing pressure from within to take a neutral stance on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, with at least one Super Rugby club urging the governing body not to mix sport and politics. Brumbies chairman Matthew Nobbs said the ACT Rugby board had taken the unanimous view that the club should not take a position on the matter and hoped RA would do the same.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928581

#29 - Part 35

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 11

>>18860648 I was wrong on Indigenous voice to parliament: Brumbies rugby boss Matthew Nobbs apologises - ACT Brumbies chairman Matthew Nobbs, who says politics and sport don’t mix, has apologised after failing to consult key stakeholders, including the rugby club’s playing group, before commenting on the Indigenous voice to parliament. Mr Nobbs released an apology statement after he publicly said the Brumbies board had taken the unanimous view that the club should not take a position on the voice and hoped Rugby Australia would do the same. The Super Rugby club chair said he should not have made the comments without consulting the players and the club’s Indigenous cultural advisory group on the issue of constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians.

>>18865735 As the penny drops, so does support for the Indigenous voice to parliament - "The campaign for an Indigenous voice to be entrenched in the Constitution is now in deep trouble. The latest Resolve polling shows the Yes vote has dropped from 64 per cent late last year, to 58 per cent earlier this year, to just 53 per cent now. This will get only worse as more questions emerge that voice proponents can’t (or won’t) answer. And while just about everyone would be happy to see Indigenous people formally recognised in the Constitution as the First Australians, it’s far from clear that a super-majority of voters are prepared to give the government what amounts to a blank cheque for a change that’s so much more than that." - Peta Credlin - theaustralian.com.au

>>18865753 ‘I’m terrified we’ll lose’: Voice advocate pleads for compromise to save referendum - Eminent Indigenous leader Mick Gooda says he is terrified the Voice to parliament referendum will fail, and Professor Tom Calma, one of the architects of the proposal, has conceded support for change is not high enough. But leading referendum backers are calling for calm on the path to winning the battle for Indigenous recognition, following results of a poll, conducted by Resolve Strategic that showed a dramatic tightening in the referendum race.

>>18865788 AFL announces support for First Nations Voice to Parliament - The Australian Football League has officially declared its support for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament. The league said while it encouraged “everyone to seek the information they need to form their own views on the referendum, the AFL proudly supports the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian Constitution through the Voice to Parliament”.

>>18865807 ‘Let’s get it over the line’: Rugby Australia and AFL back Indigenous voice to parliament - The AFL and Rugby Australia have become the latest Australian sporting codes to declare support for the yes vote, with both organisations making clear their positions on the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum on Thursday. In a full-page advertisement taken out in the Nine newspapers, a statement endorsed by RA’s board said it was time to institute a “level playing field” for First Nations people.

>>18865820 OPINION: Has Albanese misjudged the Voice of the Australian people - Yes or No? - "The campaign for the Indigenous Voice is in dire need of more time to rethink its strategy in light of growing evidence it is falling behind in the race to a referendum later this year. Time, however, is running out. A critical point is coming in the next few weeks when parliament must decide the reform proposal to put to the Australian people. This is not an election campaign when policies can be altered at the last minute and revealed a few weeks before polling day. It is a referendum that asks voters to endorse a proposal that is released months earlier and cannot be easily changed. The danger for the Yes camp is that it cements a reform model in June that loses majority support by August and is a smoking ruin by November, with untold damage to reconciliation." - David Crowe, chief political correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age - theage.com.au

>>18874922 ‘Bedwetter’: Noel Pearson rubbishes Mick Gooda’s voice suggestion - Cape York Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has rubbished renewed calls to remove from the voice to parliament proposal the power to advise executive government. “Mick Gooda’s wrong,” Mr Pearson told ABC’s RN. Mr Pearson said Mr Gooda’s intervention was akin to “wetting the bed”. “He was opposed to the voice. He only wanted symbolic recognition. So he has form in relation to the position that he’s taken. But, you know, this early bed-wetting just when we’re yet to start the campaign proper is not right. He does not represent Indigenous people in the position he’s taken.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928585

#29 - Part 36

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 12

>>18874989 Video: Liberals marshall No campaign on Voice wording as Yes side dispute erupts - A bitter dispute has broken out in the Yes camp over the wording of the Voice to parliament referendum as the Liberal Party takes a leap in its effort to convince Australians to reject the constitutional change. Voice architect Noel Pearson on Friday launched a personal attack on Indigenous leader Mick Gooda, who had spoken of his fears the referendum would fail, labelling him a “bed-wetter” who had done little for Indigenous people. Gooda, a former social justice commissioner and royal commission leader, fought back by warning Pearson his bullying undermined the referendum, echoing the private concerns of some Voice advocates who worry Pearson’s regular invective is unhelpful.

>>18875023 Indigenous voice to parliament: Liberal MP Aaron Violi could be swayed by change in wording - Liberal MPs with concerns over the Indigenous voice to parliament would consider backing the Yes campaign if Labor removed “executive government” from the constitutional amendment due to be debated in parliament next week. Casey MP Aaron Violi said the legal challenges presented by the voice being allowed to advise executive government was one of his key sticking points. “If the government made a meaningful attempt to modify the risk … it would alleviate one of the significant concerns I have with the proposal,” Mr Violi said.

>>18880143 OPINION: Now is a good time for the Yes campaign to panic - "When polling commissioned by this masthead showed that support for the Voice had slipped by five points down to just 53 per cent, powerful people on the Yes side decreed that the poll was a “bit of an outlier”. Any campaigner can tell you that polls sometimes bounce around. But minimising the trend, which the most recent track of polling continues, is foolish. The Voice referendum is on track to fail. Now is a good time for the Yes campaign to panic, before it’s too late to change the trajectory. Conservative Yes supporters are panicking strategically. They are on a mission to save the Voice. They believe that the current wording will fail at referendum and that changing it is the only way to save the Voice. They face a closing window of opportunity." - Parnell Palme McGuinness, Managing Director, Strategy and Policy at award-winning campaigns firm Agenda C. - theage.com.au

>>18885076 Greens and Pocock give Leeser hope of achieving a compromise on the Aboriginal voice - Liberal MP Julian Leeser is making a last-ditch attempt to get crossbench MPs and Indigenous leaders to support a compromise on the Indigenous voice, buoyed by the fact the Greens and independent senator David Pocock are yet to form a position on his plan to strip back the proposed new chapter to the constitution.

>>18885095 A watered down Indigenous voice to parliament would still be an affront to the ideal of constitutional equality, writes former prime minister Tony Abbott - "We don’t give a special voice to women, or to migrants, or to people with disabilities, even though the parliament sometimes passes laws that particularly refer to them, and even though they, too, have sometimes not had the fair go from our system that they deserve. Likewise, we can’t give a special voice to the First Australians without establishing a hierarchy of descent; or indeed, a pecking order among all the victims of history. Seeking an 11th-hour compromise will hardly allay people’s misgivings, just reinforce them, and confirm the Liberal Party was always right to say no." - Tony Abbott, 28th prime minister of Australia, 2013-15. - theaustralian.com.au

>>18885110 Parliament erupts over Dutton’s claim Voice will ‘re-racialise’ Australia - Bitter divisions over the Voice to parliament have descended into a feud over whether the proposal will unite or “re-racialise” Australia, with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton denouncing it as a regressive and radical threat to Australia’s democracy. But Voice architect Noel Pearson says a successful referendum will lead to “plurality, not apartheid” in Australia and that constitutional recognition will finally bring Indigenous Australians in from the margins of society.

>>18890046 Indigenous voice to parliament battlelines have been drawn and there is no nuance and very little goodwill on both sides of the debate - Anthony Albanese has gone “all in” on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government referendum and offered nothing, not a crumb of consolation, to those with genuine concerns seeking some compromise. The debate is set, the battlelines, drawn so long ago, are unchanged and there is a fateful air of a bruising and bitter debate to come.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928586

#29 - Part 37

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 13

>>18890054 A strong Indigenous voice to parliament is a sign of ‘healthy democracy’ - "There are people who disagree with the idea of the voice, and who will disagree with representations the voice might make. That is nothing to fear. A healthy democracy relies on the ability of people to be able to express their views, particularly on matters which affect them. The voice to parliament merely facilitates Indigenous Australians expressing their views on laws that affect them. It does not prevent others from expressing their views." - Professor Paula Gerber and Dr Katie O’Bryan, experts in human rights law at Monash University, specialists in Indigenous legal rights - theaustralian.com.au

>>18890059 Why I believe First Peoples will thrive with an Indigenous voice to parliament - "When Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have a say in the matters that affect our communities, we get better outcomes. We are but months away from the referendum for a voice. It is a pivotal moment. This referendum holds the promise of recognition and the potential of real practical change for communities. We must embrace this opportunity. The voice is our great next chapter, our hope for a better future." - Tom Calma, member of the referendum working group and co-author of the Calma-Langton report - theaustralian.com.au

>>18894995 Scott Morrison rejects ‘ill-defined, risky’ Indigenous voice to parliament with ‘no limits’ - Scott Morrison has denounced the Albanese government’s proposal for an Indigenous voice to parliament, warning it will have unconstrained and untested constitutional powers that will permanently create different rights for Australians based on race. In his first public comments outlining his position in detail, the former Liberal prime minister delivered a complete rejection of the government’s voice model, saying it created “significant” constitutional risk, had been poorly constructed and was ill-defined.

>>18895004 Leeser pleads for Coaliton voters to vote for Voice as Morrison criticises ‘ill-defined’ body - Liberal MP Julian Leeser has appealed to Australians to vote for the Voice to parliament, saying it will help transform remote Indigenous communities by tackling entrenched problems, as former prime minister Scott Morrison made a rare public intervention to urge a No vote. In a heartfelt speech that addressed Coalition voters specifically, Leeser - the Liberal Party’s leading Voice advocate, who quit Peter Dutton’s frontbench so he could campaign for a Yes vote – said the body would eliminate the economic and social differences between Indigenous and other Australians, rather than creating two classes of Australian, as Dutton and other No advocates claim.

>>18895012 A national Indigenous voice to parliament is the first step towards a better future as equals - "As a proud Nira illim bulluk man of the Taungurung Nation, I want to see the Yes vote get up, and I will campaign my hardest to make sure it has the best possible chance at the ballot box. A change in our lives requires a change in the existing systems that have continually failed us. We’ve heard a lot of promises in our time, most of which have turned out to be empty ones. But enshrining a voice in the Constitution guarantees we will always have a seat at the table. For those who want to see a fairer future, where our voices are valued and respected, I urge you to walk with us and vote Yes to the voice to parliament." - Marcus Stewart, member of the Referendum Working Group and co-chairman of the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria - theaustralian.com.au

>>18895018 Lidia Thorpe in senate estimates row with Indigenous minister Malarndirri McCarthy: ‘You’re a disgrace to your people’ - Indigenous Senator Lidia Thorpe has stormed out of senate estimates after a shouting match with Labor MP Malarndirri McCarthy, who told the Greens-turned-independent Senator: “You are a disgrace to your people”. Senator Thorpe and Senator McCarthy were yelling over each other during an exchange about $14.2m for community safety initiatives in the Northern Territory. After Senator Thorpe had established the money went to police, she shouted at Ms McCarthy: “How dare you”.

>>18900626 Video: Be on ‘right side of history’ on Voice, PM urges Australians - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has appealed to Australians to walk in the shoes of their Indigenous brothers and sisters as they weigh up how to vote in the Voice referendum as he accused Opposition Leader Peter Dutton of amplifying misinformation in his bid to sink the proposal. Speaking on the referendum bill in the House of Representatives, Albanese sought to dismantle the arguments of the Coalition and the No campaign while aiming to deliver a high-level pitch to Australians to be on the “right side of history”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928587

#29 - Part 38

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 14

>>18900636 Voice wording won’t change: Albanese - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed the current wording of the constitutional amendment to enshrine an Indigenous Voice to Parliament will not change. It comes as debate on the constitutional alteration bill continued in the nation's capital, with Mr Albanese imploring MPs to support the Indigenous Voice, suggesting it was a simple proposal that would provide meaningful action.

>>18900647 Anthony Albanese’s powerful speech doesn’t change the facts on the Indigenous voice to parliament - Anthony Albanese has formalised Labor’s position of not changing the wording of the referendum on the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government and rejecting any suggested compromise from supporters of the Voice aimed at ensuring its success. The Prime Minister’s parliamentary speech on the referendum bill was explicit - there would be no change to the proposed wording and he sought to blame Peter Dutton and the Coalition for the intransigence.

>>18900665 Video: Peter Dutton: The Voice will 're-racialise our nation' - Peter Dutton has delivered a full-scale denunciation of the Voice proposal in parliament. His speech on the legislation to enable the Voice referendum went much further than many were expecting. The Liberal leader warned the "referendum on the Voice will undermine our equality of citizenship". He said it will "have an Orwellian effect where all Australians are equal, but some Australians are more equal than others." Dutton even suggested "the Voice will re-racialise our nation".

>>18900677 Opposition leader Peter Dutton is right to defend our history during the Indigenous voice to parliament debate - "Earlier this week Peter Dutton made his best speech so far as Opposition Leader. But it hardly received any attention. At the heart of Dutton’s speech was a plea to recognise that Australia was a historical success, made possible, at least in part, by a Constitution that should not lightly be changed. In his words, “nowhere else in the world is there a success story like ours, one of Indigenous heritage, of British inheritance and of migration and multicultural success - three threads woven together brilliantly and harmoniously”. Such success was “not something to be toyed with lightly”, he said, yet now we were being urged to change the nation’s rule book without a constitutional convention, with just a “4½-day committee, a kangaroo court” manipulated by a government that was always trying to steamroll the process because, as Dutton said, it “wants you to vote for the voice on a vibe”." - Peta Credlin - theaustralian.com.au

>>18900698 NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell scolds Justice Ian Harrison’s Indigenous voice to parliament email to Nationals MP Pat Conaghan - Nationals MP Pat Conaghan says he will not “walk back” from comments opposing the Indigenous voice to parliament that prompted NSW Supreme Court judge Ian Harrison to label his views “disgusting”, and says he is “proud” of his speech to the lower house this week. NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell scolded Justice Ian Harrison for sending a highly critical email to Mr Conaghan in which he described the federal MP’s opposition to the voice as racist. Chief Justice Bell issued a statement on Thursday criticising Justice Harrison’s behaviour, and urging judges to steer away from controversy.

>>18905818 Noel Pearson reveals he prays Australians ‘will support the Indigenous voice to parliament by a majority of voters in a majority of the states’ - "The boomer readership of this paper is of course antipathetic to recognition. They are mostly obscurant and borderline casual racists in their views. Just read the comments at the bottom of this piece. If the referendum relied on these readers then we would have no chance. But Australia is moving on. The change that is needed to secure recognition of Australia’s First Peoples is happening beyond that group of boomers who want this to be about the culture wars. The problem is that too many party activists and parliamentary candidates and members of the Liberal and National parties want to recreate America in Australia. The extreme polarisation of politics in the US is sought to be imported to this country. There are Australians who would like Trump and MAGA-style politics to become the politics of Australia." - Noel Pearson, director of Cape York Partnership and Good to Great Schools Australia - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928589

#29 - Part 39

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 15

>>18905833 Name-calling Noel Pearson misses the point about shifting support - "Last weekend, Noel Pearson added my name to his naughty list. My offence from his perspective has been to change sides on the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament and the executive. He wrote in this newspaper that I had become a “shrill” opponent “whose lurid denunciations of the voice proposal stand directly at odds with his previous support”. We are being asked to constitutionalise a race-based lobby group, paid for by taxpayers, that could involve itself not just in debates on Indigenous affairs, but in debates about all matters of public policy, all proposed laws and all administrative decisions. That extended scope means we are being asked to constitutionalise a system of racial preference. Equality of citizenship is fundamental to what it means to live in a democracy. We should never vote for its abolition." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18905902 ‘Secret weapon’ Noel Pearson’s vitriol only helps the ‘No’ campaign in the Indigenous voice to parliament debate - "When No voters say their evening prayers they must surely be throwing in a request to God to let Pearson go on Patricia Karvelas’s radio show the next morning to let rip at his enemies or, even better, his friends. No campaigners know that every piece of epic abuse Pearson showers on them is worth its weight in gold when it comes to campaign donations and voting intentions. Australians hate polysyllabic insults of any kind but particularly despise a walking encyclopaedia like Pearson dumping on an idealistic woman such as Jacinta Price or an amiable and well-intentioned one-time friend such as Mick Gooda." - Janet Albrechtsen, opinion columnist with The Australian - theaustralian.com.au

>>18905989 Video: Australia’s sport codes unite in support of Indigenous voice to parliament - Australia’s sport codes have united in an extraordinary show of support for the Indigenous voice to parliament, advocating for a nation that “values equity and fairness”. Twenty-one organisations, including all the major sports, have signed an open letter to Australians expressing support for the voice. The letter was followed on Friday morning with a historic gathering of sporting royalty at separate events in Sydney and Melbourne.

>>18911259 Peter Dutton says reconciliation ‘may be set back’ if referendum fails - Peter Dutton has conceded ­reconciliation may be set back if the referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government fails, but declares it will be the fault of Anthony Albanese who has “starved” Australians of detail. As the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader set out political battlelines for the Yes and No campaigns in speeches to parliament, Mr Dutton told The Weekend Australian he didn’t believe the country was ready for the voice and voters weren’t “going to be strongarmed into a position”.

>>18911295 Linda Burney hits back at Dutton’s claim Labor risking reconciliation with Indigenous voice referendum - The minister for Indigenous Australians, Linda Burney, has hit back at comments from Peter Dutton and accused the opposition leader of “playing politics” with the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum and dividing Australians. “This referendum will be determined by the Australian people, not politicians, and I have great faith in the Australian people,” Burney said.

>>18915092 Wesfarmers boss Michael Chaney says foreign investors will question if Australia’s a ‘fair place’ if voice referendum fails - Wesfarmers chairman Michael Chaney, a prominent supporter of the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, has warned international investors are watching the referendum closely and will question if Australia is a “fair place” if it fails. Mr Chaney said opposing the referendum would betray Wesfarmers’ Indigenous employees, customers and suppliers, as well as the Australian people. The business veteran, who has also led the boards of NAB and Woodside Energy, said chief executives of other big companies universally shared the same view.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928591

#29 - Part 40

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 1

>>18676828 Dozens of Australian politicians urge US to abandon Julian Assange extradition - Australian federal politicians from across the political spectrum have jointly asked the US attorney general, Merrick Garland, to abandon attempts to extradite Julian Assange from the UK. The 48 MPs and senators, including 13 from the governing Labor party, warned that the pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder “set a dangerous precedent” for press freedom and would damage the reputation of the US.

>>18676832 UK MPs implore US Attorney-General to drop Assange extradition - A letter to the US attorney-general has been signed by 35 British parliamentarians calling for extradition proceedings to be dropped against Julian Assange, on the fourth anniversary of his detention at Belmarsh prison. Richard Burgon, Labour MP for Leeds East, organised the letter, which has been given the support of MPs and members of the House of Lords from six parties.

>>18708618 Assange imprisonment has gone on for too long: Wong - Foreign Minister Penny Wong has called for the extradition case against Julian Assange to come to an end. Senator Wong said the legal case and imprisonment of the WikiLeaks co-founder has been going on for too long. Australian high commissioner to the UK Stephen Smith visited Mr Assange in Belmarsh Prison earlier in April, the first time an Australian official had visited him in the facility since his arrest. The foreign minister said it would be good to continue consular assistance to the Australian while he remained in prison.

>>18729066 WikiLeaks Tweet: Imprisoned WikiLeaks publisher and journalist Julian Assange's father and brother meet with the President of Mexico who reaffirms his support for the publishers' immediate release following renewed calls by parliamentarians worldwide

>>18729066 Andrés Manuel @lopezobrador_ Tweet: (Google Translation:) I received John and Gabriel Shipton, father and brother, respectively, of Julian Assange, whom we will continue to defend, since he is a political prisoner and his case is an unacceptable insult to freedom of expression.

>>18800673 Australia PM says 'frustrated' over continued detention of Julian Assange - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday he was frustrated for not yet finding a diplomatic fix over the continued detention of Julian Assange and that he remained concerned about the mental health of the WikiLeaks' founder. "I know it's frustrating, I share the frustration," Albanese told ABC television from London where Assange is being held pending a U.S. extradition case. "I can't do more than make very clear what my position is and the U.S. administration is certainly very aware of what the Australian government's position is. There is nothing to be served by his ongoing incarceration."

>>18800699 Assange backers buoyed as PM says 'enough is enough' - Bipartisan backing for the release of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has buoyed supporters' hopes the Australian's prison stint will end, as the prime minister declares "enough is enough". In his strongest comments on the case since his election win, Anthony Albanese said there was no benefit to the 51-year-old's ongoing detention in the UK. His position was backed by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who said he was concerned for the Australian's fate and the case had gone on for too long.

>>18800731 ‘It’s incredible’: Julian Assange supporters thrilled by Dutton remarks - Supporters of Julian Assange feel buoyed by the emergence of bipartisan support for the case against the WikiLeaks founder to be brought to a close after a significant change in rhetoric from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Friday expressed frustration with his government’s inability to convince the Biden administration to drop its extradition request for Assange, saying he had left United States officials with no doubt about his position on the matter. Dutton - who had previously been highly critical of Assange – said on Friday that Assange’s case had gone on for too long and should be brought to a conclusion.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928593

#29 - Part 41

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 2

>>18819512 Caroline Kennedy meets Assange supporters, fuelling breakthrough hopes - A cross-party delegation of Australian politicians has met United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy to increase the pressure on the Biden administration to drop its pursuit of Julian Assange and warn the WikiLeaks founder’s ongoing incarceration risks undermining the US-Australia alliance. Assange’s supporters feel heartened by Kennedy’s decision to hold the meeting and are cautiously optimistic that momentum is building for a breakthrough on Assange’s case as he continues to languish in London’s high-security Belmarsh Prison. The highly sought-after meeting comes at a pivotal moment, just a fortnight before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hosts Joe Biden for his first presidential visit to Australia, and days after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton significantly shifted his rhetoric on Assange’s case.

>>18829484 WikiLeaks Tweet: Video: Australian Prime Minister reiterates calls for release of journalist/publisher Julian Assange: "A solution needs to be found that brings this matter to a conclusion…nothing is served from the further incarceration of Mr. Assange" @abc730 #FreeAssangeNOW

>>18860685 Video: Julian Assange’s father speaks on his battle to free his son - For supporters of Julian Assange, the planned visit next week by President Biden is an opportunity to focus attention on Assange's continued imprisonment in the UK and potential extradition to the US. John Shipton is Julian Assange's father, and he speaks to Sarah Ferguson about his fight to free his son - 7.30 / ABC News In-depth

>>18885050 ‘We are considering all options’: Assange supporters open to a plea deal with US - Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange are open to a plea deal with United States authorities that might clear the way for his release from a British prison, with his wife declaring his freedom had to be the priority. Urging the Australian government to press the case for his release, Stella Assange said her husband was being detained for revealing the truth and must never be extradited to face charges in the US.

>>18885057 Video: IN FULL: Stella Assange, Jennifer Robinson address National Press Club on Julian Assange - Stella Assange was part of Julian Assange's legal team since his confinement in the Ecuadorian embassy and they got Married in 2022. Jennifer Robinson has been advising Julian Assange and Wikileaks since 2010. Julian Assange has been confined in Belmarsh prison since April 2019. - ABC News (Australia)

>>18885064 Video: Prime Minister dodges Stella Assange meeting - “Prime Minister you would be aware that Stella Assange is in Parliament House, and in fact is in the gallery right now. Prime Minister why are you not meeting with Stella today? Will you meet with Stella tomorrow? And why won’t you do more to see Julian Assange reunited with Stella and their young sons Gabriel and Max?” - Andrew Wilkie MP, May 22, 2023

#29 - Part 42

Cardinal George Pell - Sexual Abuse and Vatican Financial Scandal Allegations

>>18682194, >>18682198 Cardinal George Pell: A Reminiscence - "Since his unexpected death on 10 January 2023 in Rome, there have been many words written about Cardinal George Pell. Some of those assessments have been very positive and attested to his extraordinary input into the Church in Australia and internationally, and others have been highly critical and, in some instances, quite derogatory. There is little doubt that Cardinal Pell could be a polarising figure and anecdotally you either fell in the camp of being “for” or “against.” My intention here is not to add to the body of opinion, which is now accumulating at a prodigious rate, but rather to reflect on my own encounters with Cardinal Pell given that I worked closely with him during the preparations and the execution of World Youth Day in Sydney in 2008." - Very Rev Peter G. Williams AM - catholicoutlook.org

>>18855396 Cardinal Pell Showed Us What Interior Freedom Really Looks Like - "Cardinal Pell is a man who remained sane despite the insanity of being imprisoned on false, horrific charges. He is a model for our times and a man to remember always in our prayers." - Maryella Hierholzer - ncregister.com

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928595

#29 - Part 43

Australia / China Tensions - Part 1

>>18676766 Video: Federal government says agreement reached with China to resolve barley dispute - The federal government has agreed to suspend its appeal to the World Trade Organization over Chinese government tariffs on Australian barley just before the international body was due to hand down a finding over the dispute. Foreign Minister Penny Wong announced that China had promised to conduct an "expedited review" of the tariffs over the next three months and that, in return, Australia would "temporarily suspend" its WTO action over the same period.

>>18676772 Chinese Vice FM to visit Australia, Fiji amid signs of warming ties - Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu will visit Australia and Fiji this week at their invitation, the Chinese foreign ministry confirmed at a regular press briefing on Monday, saying Ma will hold the new round of political consultation between the officials of the foreign ministries of China and Australia. Experts said Ma's visit to Australia, following talks between the two countries' foreign, defense and commerce ministries, showed that China and Australia are resuming communication channels in different areas and levels. - Zhang Changyue - globaltimes.cn

>>18676779 China’s military strategy in the Pacific and how Australia can avoid being beaten - China is playing a 2500-year-old strategy board game to win over the region and Australia needs more than just submarines and missiles to play, one of our top security analysts has warned. Australian National University professor of international security and intelligence and defence studies Professor John Blaxland said Australia’s secret weapon was in greater regional engagement as much as new military hardware.

>>18682151 Video: Go inside one of the most powerful warships in the world - CNN's Will Ripley reports exclusively from one of the most powerful warships on the planet, the USS Mississippi, a U.S. nuclear submarine that's on high alert for threats from China.

>>18693611 Video: NSW man charged with selling Australian defence secrets to two foreign spies - A man has been charged with selling Australian defence, economic and national security secrets to two foreign spies working for the People’s Republic of China. Alexander Csergo, 55, was arrested by Australian Federal Police at Bondi in Sydney’s eastern suburbs late on Friday and charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, a charge that carries a 15-year jail term.

>>18708561 Call for audit as Chinese DJI drones join Australian Defence Force war games - The Australian Defence Force is using Chinese drones from a company black-listed by the US, prompting calls for a government-wide policy on the use of technology from high-risk suppliers. Hundreds of drones from Chinese company DJI are in use across the ADF, mainly for training, and some will be used in a three-week military exercise off the Queensland coast in coming weeks.

>>18708573 Bondi man sold info on AUKUS and lithium mining to alleged Chinese spies, court hears - Bondi businessman Alexander Csergo sold information about the AUKUS agreement, lithium mining and iron ore to alleged Chinese spies, a court has heard, as he is denied bail and his actions are deemed “highly suspicious”. Mr Csergo fronted the Downing Centre District Court on Monday for a bail hearing via video link, after he was arrested by the AFP on Friday and charged with one count of reckless foreign interference. While Mr Csergo‘s defence lawyer said his actions were “nothing sinister”, Magistrate Michael Barko said his decision to meet with alleged spies, using the anglicised names Ken and Evelyn, in cafes in Shanghai was “highly suspicious”.

>>18714036 China ‘a danger’ to accused AUKUS information seller Alexander Csergo - The Bondi businessman alleged to have sold AUKUS information to Chinese spies could be in danger from “people very interested in him not giving evidence against the Republic of China”, according to a magistrate who ruled that keeping him detained would help ensure his safety. Alexander Csergo was denied bail on the grounds he was a flight risk after a court heard he sold information about the AUKUS security agreement, lithium mining and iron ore to alleged Chinese agents in exchange for envelopes of cash.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928596

#29 - Part 44

Australia / China Tensions - Part 2

>>18714044 Video: 2 NY residents allegedly ran secret Chinese police station: 'Significant national security matter' - The FBI and federal prosecutors announced Monday the arrests of two New York residents who allegedly ran an undisclosed Chinese government police station in Manhattan's Chinatown neighborhood. Lu Jianwang and Chen Jinping have each been charged with conspiring to act as agents of China's government, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York.

>>18714060 Video: Confusion as ‘Chinese police’ car spotted on street in Melbourne’s southeast - A car modified to look like a Chinese police vehicle has been spotted on a road in Melbourne’s southeast. A photo of a grey Nissan with Chinese characters on its bonnet and side reading “police” and “special police” appeared on Reddit on Sunday. The car also featured a purple shield logo used on official police cars in China. The user who posted the photo said they had reported the car to local police, who indicated they had received five calls in 90 minutes about the same vehicle. The poster also said the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation had contacted them about the location of the vehicle.

>>18719406 Chinese-Australians ‘more wary of AUKUS’, Lowy survey finds - Chinese-Australians are significantly less supportive of the AUKUS alliance and the prospect of Australian military involvement in a US war against China than the broader Australian population, a new survey suggests. The Lowy Institute’s Being Chinese in Australia Poll also reveals a big jump in the proportion of Chinese-Australians expressing concern at “foreign interference” by the US in Australia’s political processes, from 36 per cent in 2021 to 62 per cent in the latest survey. They are less concerned about foreign interference by Beijing, with 54 per cent identifying it a problem compared with 50 per cent in 2021. The poll shows Chinese-Australians have much more confidence in Anthony Albanese (60 per cent) than they did his ­predecessor Scott Morrison (49 per cent), reflecting the Labor Prime Minister’s efforts to dial-down the friction between Canberra and Beijing.

>>18719425 Video: Live mic picks up WA premier badmouthing shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie at Beijing lunch - On day one of a historic Chinese trade mission, West Australian Premier Mark McGowan has unwittingly reignited a feud with shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie after a microphone picked up his disparaging comments made about Hastie’s views on China. “The other Western Australian who was senior, well, there was a few of them actually - Hastie. He swallowed some sort of Cold War pills back … when he was born, and he couldn’t get his mindset out of that.” Mr. Hastie criticised the premier for inserting himself in foreign policy debates and said he wished he would focus on domestic issues like fixing the Peel Health Campus in Hastie’s WA Canning electorate rather than trying to do Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s job.

>>18719485 Video: TikTok ban backlash: China thinks it’s foolish - Anyone who cares to search will undoubtedly find some very amusing TikTok videos made about the very uproar TikTok has been causing lately. Last week it was banned from Australian government phones and devices. It’s deemed to be a risk to our national security because of the Chinese ownership of its parent company. The decision has upset the local arm of TikTok who maintain their app is harmless fun, not a spy tool. As Amelia Adams reports, it has also outraged the Chinese Communist Party, which is once again warning us not to treat Beijing as the enemy. - 60 Minutes Australia

>>18723436 Mark McGowan’s China trade mission: WA Premier calls for National Cabinet to be held in Beijing - Premier Mark McGowan has called for National Cabinet to be held in China in an unprecedented pitch to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese aimed at rebuilding relations between the two nations. The bold proposal to host all State and Territory leaders came on the second day of the Premier’s five-day trade mission in Beijing. “The Prime Minister, hopefully, will come to China sometime in the next six months and meet with President Xi Jinping,” Mr McGowan said. “One of the things he could do is, invite all the Premiers and Chief Ministers to come with him.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928598

#29 - Part 45

Australia / China Tensions - Part 3

>>18723446 Calls for decoupling 'now in the past,' Western Australian Premier says, as Australia seeks to boost trade ties with China - Premiers of Australian states have been visiting China in droves amid thawing bilateral relations, eyeing to further deepen trade and economic cooperation with its largest trading partner, while the ongoing visit of Western Australian Premier Mark McGowan being the latest representation despite some voices hyping about "decoupling." In an interview with the Global Times on Wednesday, McGowan highlighted a strong and beneficial bilateral relationship, stressing the calls for "decoupling" "are now in the past" and now there is "an appetite for a better relationship with China" after the new federal government took office. - Xiong Xinyi, Yu Jincui, and Xing Xiaojing - globaltimes.cn

>>18723453 In New Caledonia, Australia urges Pacific island unity amid China, U.S. competition - Australia's foreign minister urged Pacific island countries on Thursday to stay united in the face of great power competition as she visited New Caledonia, where the president raised concerns about Australia's AUKUS nuclear submarine programme. Foreign Minister Penny Wong's visit to the French territory coincides with a push by a China-backed group for several Pacific island nations, including New Caledonia, to sign a splinter security pact.

>>18729148 ‘The king of WA’: McGowan moves closer to Beijing - Between glasses of Australian wine under golden chandeliers at the China World Summit Wing in downtown Beijing, captains of industry, embassy officials and mining moguls gathered to hear West Australian Premier Mark McGowan speak. “The King of WA,” his Chinese hosts reportedly called him this week. McGowan had returned to Beijing after four years of COVID-induced absence, $20 billion in trade strikes and years of division between Perth and the former Coalition government in Canberra on China policy. In the Chinese capital, he predicted the relationship between Australia and China would become “a harmonious and productive one” and announced China’s version of Davos would be heading to Perth this year as WA’s annual exports to China hit a record $146 billion. “Perhaps above any other state in Australia, Western Australia understands the importance of the relationship with China,” he said on Tuesday.

>>18729172 Lawyers for ‘Top Gun’ pilot write to US ambassador asking to halt extradition - Lawyers for former US military pilot Daniel Duggan have written to the US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy and her Australian counterpart Kevin Rudd urging for the extradition of the father-of-six to be withdrawn. Duggan, 54, an Australian citizen, has been in custody since October accused of training Chinese military pilots in South Africa in 2012 without seeking permission from the US Department of Justice -- an allegation he denies.

>>18734375 McGowan ‘has lost respect’ after gaffe-marred China visit - WA Premier Mark McGowan’s gaffe-marred visit to China may have hurt his standing not just at home but also in Beijing. While Mr McGowan’s visit was designed to help restore relations that had been strained in recent years, Kevin Carrico - a senior lecturer in Chinese studies at Monash University - said it may have actually diminished his standing in the eyes of Beijing. “Leaders in Beijing will be laughing at his gullibility because what he’s showing is a willingness to essentially do anything to please Beijing,” he said. “In one sense, of course, that makes Beijing happy. In another sense, there’s no chance of the leaders in Beijing respecting him.”

>>18734455 ‘No sense of safety’: Australian citizens reveal extraordinary lengths Chinese Communist Party will go to silence dissent - Two Australian citizens have detailed the extraordinary lengths the Chinese government will go to silence foreign dissidents and the harrowing experiences of those subject to the intimidation and harassment campaigns. An Australian parliamentary committee has heard about the harrowing experiences of two Chinese-Australians subject to extraordinary harassment campaigns by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Journalist Vicky Xu and artist Badiucao spoke to the senate committee on foreign interference through social media, detailing the CCP lengths the Chinese government will go to silence foreign dissidents. Ms Xu, a journalist and senior fellow at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), said the Chinese government had been trying to “to silence, intimidate and harass” for her entire six to seven year career. Like Ms Xu, Badiucao said he had also been subject to a smear campaign, detailing multiple attempts to create fake versions of his website with slightly different domain names.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928600

#29 - Part 46

Australia / China Tensions - Part 4

>>18739389 Video: Conflict over Taiwan isn’t ‘inevitable’, Defence Minister Richard Marles says - Defence Minister Richard Marles says he doesn’t think a war over Taiwan is “inevitable” as he continues to defend Australia’s multi-billion dollar nuclear submarine plans. Speaking on the eve of the release of a landmark review of Australia’s military capability, Mr Marles said the government remained optimistic a China-Taiwan conflict could be avoided. “I have a sense of optimism. But having said that, we live in a very complex and difficult world. And we need to be alive to that,” he said.

>>18744386 Defence Strategic Review calls for a more lethal military to handle China expansion - The Australian Defence Force will be transformed into a more agile, lethal force, capable of mounting missile strikes and amphibious ­assaults far from the mainland under an ambitious blueprint to respond to China’s unprecedented military expansion. The government’s Defence Strategic Review, released on Monday, warns Australia’s strategic circumstances have “radically” worsened, to the point that “we now face as a nation the prospect of major conflict in the region that directly threatens our national ­interest”.

>>18744438 Defence Strategic Review: Beijing accuses Canberra of hyping ‘China threat arguments’ to increase military budget - Beijing has accused Australia of hyping “Chinese threat arguments” as an “excuse” to expand its military power. In the first response to the Albanese government’s Defence Strategic Review, Beijing said China had always pursued a purely “defensive” national defence policy. “We are committed to maintaining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific and the world, and do not pose a threat to any country,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said.

>>18744498 Video: WA Premier Mark McGowan raised cases of detained Australians during China trip - Western Australia Premier Mark McGowan said he raised the cases of two detained Australians while he was on a five-day trip in China. Journalist Cheng Lei has been detained in China since August 2020 and is accused of leaking state secrets, while writer Yang Hengjun was arrested in January 2019 and the case against him has never been publicly disclosed.

>>18749483 Defence Strategic Review: Neighbours tipped to support new posture - As Australia prepares to broaden out its defence posture from a focus on protecting our own borders to one that contributes to regional security and a balance of power, a key question to ask is; Will our neighbours welcome this development? The review, which explicitly names China’s claims over the South China Sea as the biggest threat to Australia and its neighbourhood, will inevitably touch some nerves in a region already highly attuned to any activity that could further inflame tensions.

>>18749519 NT prepares for increase in military spending, US Marines after Defence Strategic Review - The Northern Territory is poised to play a key role in Australia's future missile defences, according to NT Chief Minister Natasha Fyles, as the region prepares for an influx of soldiers and defence force spending. A major defence force review released on Monday by the Albanese government, touted the need for immediate upgrades and developments to bases across northern Australia. The Defence Strategic Review pinpointed a "network of bases, ports and barracks stretching in Australian territory from Cocos (Keeling) Islands in the north-west, through RAAF bases Learmonth, Curtin, Darwin, Tindal, Scherger and Townsville" for urgent and comprehensive upgrades.

>>18755020 Time running out to prevent war over Taiwan, Japanese ambassador warns - Time is running out for Australia and other democracies to deter China from launching an invasion of Taiwan, Japan’s departing ambassador to Australia has warned. Shingo Yamagami, whose Canberra posting ends this weekend after almost 2½ years, accused his Chinese counterpart of launching a character assassination against him and rejected suggestions in the diplomatic community he had been called back to Tokyo early because of his outspoken style. Describing a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan as an increasing concern, Yamagami said: “My point is: time is running out. Time is quite limited because our response has been slow. So rather than letting our counterpart think they see a window of opportunity to resort to military action, we have to do our best to narrow or even close that window of opportunity.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928602

#29 - Part 47

Australia / China Tensions - Part 5

>>18766087 Challenge to AFP raid over Chinese pilot training fails - A former fighter pilot suspected of helping train Chinese People's Liberation Army pilots has failed in a court challenge to the validity of an Australian Federal Police raid on his home. The AFP executed a search warrant and seized items from the home of Keith Hartley, chief operating officer of the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), in November. The warrant said Hartley was suspected of breaking commonwealth law by organising and facilitating training to PLA pilots "in regard to military aircraft platforms and military doctrine, tactics and strategy". In a judgment delivered in Sydney on Friday (April 28, 2023), Justice Wendy Abraham said Mr Hartley had not established the warrant was invalid. The sole ground of the invalidity claim was the allegation that the warrant did not sufficiently state an offence. "It states conduct capable of constituting an offence, and it does so with a reasonable degree of precision," she said, in dismissing his application.

>>18766108 Daniel Duggan’s family protest outside US embassy in Canberra - The wife of imprisoned Australian Daniel Duggan, the former US marine pilot wanted for extradition by America, has led a protest outside the US embassy in Canberra demanding her husband be released and his extradition abandoned. Saffrine Duggan told protesters on Friday morning: "I am determined to fight this terrible injustice, and to demand that Australian sovereignty is respected. Today Dan has been gone for 191 days - without any Australian charges, convictions, or history of violence – on the say-so of the United States government."

>>18766129 Daniel Duggan’s case to return to court on Monday, 1 May 2023 - Lawyers have argued the request for Daniel Duggan’s extradition is politically motivated - catalysed by the US’s deepening geopolitical contest with China, and invalid under Australia’s extradition treaty with the US. The US alleges Duggan, a former US citizen now a naturalised Australian, trained Chinese fighter pilots to land fighter jets on aircraft carriers, in defiance of arms trafficking laws, and engaged in a conspiracy to launder money. Those claims have not been tested in court.

>>18770941 ‘I’m not a bot’: Melbourne scholar behind pro-Beijing Twitter account plans to ‘debunk’ Xinjiang claims. To many online, Maureen A Huebel almost doesn’t seem like a real person. The vociferously anti-American Twitter account posts a constant stream of pro-China - and more recently, pro-Russia - messages to her 3000 followers, with an unusual focus on debunking claims of Uyghur repression in Xinjiang. In one viral tweet that sparked particular backlash, Mrs Huebel - whose bio lists a series of academic qualifications from universities including Monash - claimed she was planning to travel to the troubled northwestern region to study the “happiness” of the local population.

>>18770981 Chinese academic centers welcome Australian scholar who has come under attack after announcing plans to visit Xinjiang - Two academic centers in China on Friday expressed a warm welcome to Maureen A Huebel, an Australian scholar, who has been under attack from anti-China forces after announcing her plan to visit China's Xinjiang region in 2024, saying they are willing to work with the Australian scholar and assist her in conducting research in the region. - Liu Xin - globaltimes.cn

>>18770996 Attacks won't scare me off from Xinjiang research: Australian scholar - Maureen Huebel, a Melbourne-based scholar who has been the target of online harassment for debunking Western mainstream narratives about the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, said she would not back down in her research. "The more opposition I got, the more determined I became to complete my project," Huebel said in article published on Global Times. One post that has sparked particular backlash was published on March 4. "I am travelling to Xinjiang in 2024 to study how the Uygurs have contributed to the substantial growth in the Xinjiang GDP and look at their population growth," she wrote, adding "Analyse their happiness and expression through dancing." Since announcing her plans, Huebel had been hounded by trolls, with some even sending her death threats. Some accused her of being a "sophisticated Chinese bot". - Ma Chi - chinadaily.com.cn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928605

#29 - Part 48

Australia / China Tensions - Part 6

>>18771047 Melbourne scholar smeared as 'bot' as she tries to debunk false Xinjiang claims - A Melbourne scholar was accused of being an elaborate fake account after she posted a series of pro-China messages to her over 3,000 followers. Some of her posts are focused on debunking claims of the "Xinjiang Uygur genocide," a false narrative that has been repeated by Western politicians and media outlets for years out of political reasons. She believes that her Twitter suffering is an example of the result of growing U.S. fears as China's growth trajectory is set to overtake the American economy in a few years and Australia is experiencing pressure from the U.S. in every aspect of their lives. She said that the major challenge of the Australian government is striking a balance between what the U.S. wants Australia to do and what Australia wants to do. She suggested that Australia should stop acting like a U.S. follower and become an "adult" acting in its own interests. "China is not a threat, but an opportunity," Huebel said. "We should get involved in cooperation with China." - CGTN - chinadaily.com.cn

>>18771116 Malicious attacks can't stop my research about Xinjiang - "I joined Twitter to do preliminary research, but I did not expect the outrage that I would receive from Western people. A backlash blew up even before I started the project. The West is convinced that China is bad, so I couldn't be a critical thinker and say anything good about China, despite the fact that I am an established scholar in Australia and Britain with many published papers. Australia experiences pressure from the US in every aspect of our lives. At this point in history, the US is seriously threatened by the amazing economic growth of China. China's growth trajectory is set to overtake the US economy in a few years. American hegemony, with its international power and control, is now weakening." - Maureen Huebel - globaltimes.cn

>>18779820 Alleged illegal conduct by ASIO could stymie extradition of Daniel Duggan to US on charges of arms trafficking - Alleged illegal conduct by Australia’s spy agency could halt a US effort to extradite a former fighter pilot accused of training Chinese military aviators. Lawyers for Daniel Edmund Duggan, 54, will argue to temporarily stay a request from the US to extradite him to America while Australia’s Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) conducts a formal investigation into the conduct of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) agents in regards to Duggan’s case. Duggan will spend at least another 86 days in prison before his case comes back to court in July. He has already been incarcerated, much of it in isolation, for 191 days.

>>18784903 Australian police searched pilot's home for China fighter jet records - Australian police searched the home of a British former test pilot for documents related to China's J-16 strike fighter, Australia's intelligence partners, and China's biggest aviation company, a court judgment shows. The search in November was part of an investigation into Western military pilots training China's military at a time of growing tension between China and the United States and its allies. Keith Hartley, chief operating officer of the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), has not been charged. Federal police searched Hartley's home on suspicion he had broken the law by providing military style training directed or funded by China between 2018 and 2022.

>>18794926 Banning WeChat would ‘damage’ democracy, experts say - Banning WeChat in Australia risks causing “emotional, psychological and practical harm” to the country’s large Chinese-speaking community, experts have told a Senate inquiry. Dr Wanning Sun, from the University of Technology Sydney, and Dr Haiqing Yu, from RMIT, on Thursday made a late submission to the inquiry in which they argued banning the Chinese social media app would cause more harm than good. WeChat, they say, is essential for communication between Chinese Australians and their families, friends, and business partners in China given other social media apps including WhatsApp and Facebook are banned. The platform was even used, in some cases, to farewell dying relatives while China’s borders were closed during the pandemic. “WeChat is a necessity, not a choice for many Chinese Australians,” Dr Sun and Dr Yu said. Seth Kaplan, a lecturer at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, last month told the inquiry into foreign interference through social media he would support banning WeChat, which he described as a “narrative machine for the CCP” that is “worse than TikTok”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928606

#29 - Part 49

Australia / China Tensions - Part 7

>>18800562 Rishi Sunak says China is Britain’s greatest threat to economic security - China is the single greatest threat to Britain’s economic security, according to British Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak. In an exclusive interview in his Downing Street office, Mr Sunak also hailed the AUKUS agreement with Australia, the US and the UK as “the most significant multilateral defence partnership in generations”. In comments on China that are stronger than any others he has made since becoming Prime Minister, Mr Sunak characterised China’s behaviour as “increasingly authoritarian at home and assertive abroad”.

>>18800625 China challenge ‘epoch-defining’, Rishi Sunak warns as Xi Jinping vows PLA ‘wall of steel’ - Xi Jinping has declared China will build the People’s Liberation Army into a “great wall of steel” to protect the rising giant’s “national sovereignty” on the eve of ­Anthony Albanese, Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak unveiling their monumental AUKUS submarine deal. British Prime Minister, Mr Sunak, warned China posed an “epoch-defining systemic challenge” as he headed to San Diego in the US to meet Mr Albanese and Mr Biden to lay out their AUKUS plans to deter an increasingly assertive Beijing.

>>18800905 Inside the US Marine Corps training mission in Australia - The US Marines are helping the Australian Army sharpen its amphibious warfighting capability during a six-month mission down under that is preparing both countries to respond to Chinese military aggression. The Army’s 1st Brigade, based in Darwin, is tapping into the expertise of up to 2500 Marines as the unit is redesigned to specialise in littoral combat in coastal areas that will be crucial in any Indo-Pacific conflict.

>>18810246 ‘Missing her kids’: Aussie journalist Cheng Lei reaches 1000 days in Chinese jail - For almost 1000 days Australian journalist Cheng Lei has woken up inside a Chinese cell, cut off from her two young children in Melbourne and her friends in Beijing. Each day she wakes up still unaware of the crime she is alleged to have committed, in a country that she had devoted her professional life to, that now only gives her two hours a day of fresh air. “The 1000 days [milestone] is going to be really tough for her,” said Cheng’s partner Nick Coyle. “She misses her children enormously.”

>>18814604 Australia accused of undermining Fiji-China relationship, amid uncertainty over police agreement - China has accused Australia of trying to sabotage its relationship with Fiji as questions swirl over whether the Pacific Island country will cut security and law enforcement ties with Beijing. The relationship between Beijing and Suva has cooled ever since Sitiveni Rabuka won power late last year, particularly after the new prime minister reversed a decision forcing Taiwan to downgrade the official title of its diplomatic mission in Fiji. Mr Rabuka has also repeatedly said that he will scrap a 2011 police cooperation agreement which Fiji signed with China under former prime minister Frank Bainimarama, saying he wanted to limit law enforcement ties to countries with "similar systems." Late last week the Chinese embassy in Fiji issued its sharpest statement yet on the issue, saying it hoped "relevant parties" would "abandon ideological prejudice, and view the law enforcement and police cooperation between China and Fiji objectively and rationally".

>>18814613 Australian Border Force called to suspend Chinese DJI drones in-line with ADF - A Chinese-made drone grounded by Defence and black-listed by the US military is still being used by the Australian Border Force sparking fears the high-risk technology could compromise the agency’s “sensitive” operations. The Coalition is calling for the ABF to follow the Australian Defence Force in suspending the use of drones and other products manufactured by controversial Chinese company Da Jiang Innovations (DJI) pending a security audit.

>>18819524 Exclusive: China-Australia economic and trade relations are facing an important window period: Chinese Ambassador - China-Australia economic and trade relations are facing an important window period. The two sides have important consensus on jointly maintaining the positive momentum of bilateral relations, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian told the Global Times in a written interview. The recent resumption of exchanges and cooperation between China and Australia in various fields fully demonstrates that despite some differences, the two sides have a strong desire for communication and exchanges and share broad and profound common interests. This year is crucial for the steady and sound development of China-Australia relations, said Xiao. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928607

#29 - Part 50

Australia / China Tensions - Part 8

>>18829502 Death of Manasseh Sogavare’s right hand man threatens to destabilise Solomon Islands - Solomon Islands’ Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s nephew and political fixer has died of a heart attack in a development that could destabilise the Pacific’s most pro-China government. Multiple Solomon Islands’ sources said Robson Djokovic, Mr Sogavare’s longtime chief of staff, died of a heart attack on Wednesday. A local political source said Mr Djokovic provided the backroom strength underpinning Mr Sogavare’s hold on power.

>>18829502 Untimely Passing of Government’s Chief of Staff Shocks Many - The untimely passing of the government’s chief of staff, Robson Djokovic, has shocked many, particularly within government circles, where he has been a long-time confidant and trusted advisor of Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare. Multiple sources say that Mr. Djokovic died of a suspected heart attack. Mr. Djokovic has been a key figure in Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s government, often seen as a formidable operative during the lobbying period.

>>18835358 Trade Minister Don Farrell given surprise Forbidden City tour, China's foreign minister to visit Australia - Trade Minister Don Farrell has been given a surprise tour of Beijing's Forbidden City by a senior Chinese Commerce Ministry official, in an encouraging sign ahead of talks later on Friday with his counterpart, Wang Wentao. Senator Farrell was hosted on the tour by the ministry's deputy director-general, Peng Wei. The unexpected invitation came about 4 hours ahead of Senator Farrell's scheduled sit-down meeting with Mr Wang. As he entered the Forbidden City, Senator Farrell said he was "very privileged to be invited here to this iconic site".

>>18835386 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on May 11, 2023 - "China and Australia are both important countries in the Asia-Pacific with highly complementary economies and mutually beneficial business ties. To improve and maintain the sound growth of bilateral ties serves the fundamental interests of both countries and peoples."

>>18835396 China trip: Don Farrell firm on national security - Trade Minister Don Farrell will push back on Chinese calls for Australia to relax its foreign investment rules, declaring ahead of high-level talks in Beijing that the Albanese government reserves its right to block stakes in critical companies on national security grounds. Senator Farrell, who will meet Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao on Friday, said he felt “the weight of responsibility on my shoulders” to negotiate an end to Chinese trade bans on Australian companies.

>>18835410 Australian trade minister visits China to seek cooperation as ties face ‘important window’ - Despite Australia's keenness to boost trade with China, more concerted efforts are needed to further improve ties, analysts noted. China's core concerns must be respected and addressed by the Australian side, in order to further promote bilateral cooperation, Chinese officials and analysts said. "It is hoped that the Australian side will earnestly abide by the one-China principle, an important prerequisite and political basis for improving, upholding, and further developing China-Australia relations, and earnestly respect each other's core interests and major concerns," Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said. - Wang Cong, Yin Yeping and Song Lin - globaltimes.cn

>>18835427 GT Voice: Finding pragmatic balance key for Australia to recover China trade - Despite the increasing positive signs for the thawing of China-Australia economic and trade relations, whether bilateral trade is really heading toward "a warm spring" is still up to whether Canberra can find a pragmatic point in balancing its economic and political imperatives. The further improvement of bilateral relations requires Australia's realization that China is Australia's partner and did not and will not pose a security threat to Australia. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18840338 China trip: Don Farrell returns without trade concessions, touts ‘positive momentum’ - Trade Minister Don Farrell is returning from a two-day trip to China without concessions from Beijing on a raft of trade bans against Australian exports, but says there is “positive momentum” in the countries’ relationship. Senator Farrell said he and Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao agreed during high-level talks on Friday night to “step up dialogue” to resolve the trade issues. He said Mr Wang had agreed to visit him in South Australia to build on their discussions.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928609

#29 - Part 51

Australia / China Tensions - Part 9

>>18840352 Resumption of high-level economic talks sends encouraging signs on thaw of China-Australia relations - Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell's visit to Beijing witnessed multiple encouraging signs in the stabilized recovery of China-Australia cooperation, including the resumption of a landmark high-level economic meeting and the minister's tour of Beijing's iconic Forbidden City. But Canberra needs to understand that actions that harm China's core interests and provoke China's red lines could undermine the improvement of bilateral relations. It is crucial for Australia to have the political wisdom and strategic confidence to cherish the hard-won recovery of China-Australia ties, instead of pursuing the strategic interests of the US at the expense of its own interests. - Wang Jiamei - globaltimes.cn

>>18840385 Fired TikTok exec says Chinese government had access to app user data - A former executive fired from TikTok’s parent company ByteDance made a raft of accusations against the tech giant, including that it stole content from competitors like Instagram and Snapchat, and served as a “propaganda tool” for the Chinese government by suppressing or promoting content favourable to the country’s interests. The allegations were made in a complaint on Friday in the US by Yintao Yu, the head of engineering for ByteDance’s US operations from August 2017 to November 2018, as part of a wrongful termination lawsuit filed earlier this month in San Francisco Superior Court. Yu claims he was fired for disclosing “wrongful conduct” he saw at the company. In the complaint, Yu alleges the Chinese government monitored ByteDance’s work from within its Beijing headquarters and provided guidance on advancing “core communist values”. Yu said government officials had the ability to turn off the Chinese version of ByteDance’s apps, and maintained access to all company data, including information stored in the United States.

>>18844628 China hails ‘substantial progress’ on trade ties with Australia - China says “substantial progress” has been made on stabilising trade ties with Australia during high-level ministerial talks and the country is willing to work towards “more positive results”. But Beijing continues to push for improved investment access in key areas, including critical minerals, and wants Australia’s support to gain entry to the trans-Pacific trade partnership.

>>18844640 Trick of the trade? China ‘ramping up the pressure’ - The truth is we don’t know when, or even if, China will remove tariffs and imposts on Australian imports. In January, China’s top diplomat in West Australia visited Geraldton Fishermen’s Co-operative. Rumours raced around the industry: were the fat years about to return? Five months on and not only has the unofficial black-listing not ended, China’s customs officials have clamped down on what had been a roaring illicit trade smuggled through Hong Kong and Taiwan. If normal market access is returned, the Albanese government will deserve much praise, but we should hold the applause until the Chinese follow through.

>>18849888 China, Australia resume high-level economic dialogue as bilateral ties improve under Albanese government - China and Australia are expected to see marked improvement in their trade ties with the two countries ramping up efforts to shore up economic cooperation following the recent resumption of high-level visits and dialogues, experts said. It could be considered as a starting point for the reset of their bilateral relations, which hit a very low point due to the anti-China policy by the previous Australian government. - Zhang Hongpei and Wang Jiamei - globaltimes.cn

>>18849904 Fishing boss sanctioned by the US for human rights abuses backs powerful Chinese-Australian group - A Chinese fishing magnate recently blacklisted by the US government for human rights abuses is a top donor and ‘permanent honorary chairman’ of an influential China-Australia organisation with suspected links to the Chinese government. Zhuo Xinrong has been a donor and senior office-holder with the Sydney-based Australia China Economics Trade and Culture Association (ACETCA) for more than eight years, and the organisation refuses to say it has cut ties with him.

>>18860436 Biden’s 11th hour Quad snub a disappointment, a mess and a gift to Beijing - Anthony Albanese’s disappointment is Xi Jinping’s victory. Joe Biden’s decision to pull out of next week’s Quad leaders’ summit in Sydney is a personal blow for the prime minister, who was preparing to bask in the glow of hosting three of the world’s most powerful leaders in his home town. China’s president-for-life, meanwhile, will be giddy with delight at the summit falling into disarray.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928613

#29 - Part 52

Australia / China Tensions - Part 10

>>18860441 Joe Biden skips Australia, PNG when ‘turning up is half the battle’ - Joe Biden’s cancellation of his Australian trip and the scrapping of next week’s Quad meeting in Sydney will be deeply disappointing for Anthony Albanese. The optics of a presidential visit, and of hosting the US, Indian and Japanese leaders together at the Opera House, would have capped-off a remarkable year of diplomacy for Albanese, who has proven to be a surprisingly capable international statesman.

>>18860738 How 'dark underbelly' and forced labour is helping to fuel Australia's love affair with cheap solar - Ramila Chanisheff is an ethnic Uyghur hailing from the north-western Chinese province of Xinjiang, or East Turkistan as she calls it. Xinjiang is one of the world's biggest producers of polysilicon, a crucial ingredient in modern-day solar panels. About 45 per cent of the world's supply comes from the province, where metallurgical grade silicon is crushed and purified in huge factories. But researchers and human rights activists claim those factories are also home to the widespread use of forced Uyghur labour.

>>18860751 Eleven Chinese institutes welcome Australian scholar’s planned Xinjiang visit in joint letter - Eleven Chinese academic institutes jointly released a letter of support to Maureen A Huebel, an Australian scholar, who has come under attack from anti-China forces after announcing her plan to visit China's Xinjiang region in 2024. In an article Huebel wrote to the Global Times in March, she stated reasons for her interest in the Xinjiang region when she noticed rising levels of Australian poverty and homelessness. Xinjiang was identified as among the fastest GDP growth of all Chinese provinces and regions. - GT staff reporters - globaltimes.cn

>>18860771 West's 'academic freedom' only a myth - What Australian scholar Maureen A. Huebel experienced recently is an example of how all talk of academic freedom in the West is just a myth. Huebel said on her Twitter handle that she planned a trip to the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region to "study how the Uygurs have contributed to the substantial growth in Xinjiang GDP and look at their population growth", but was bombarded with criticism, with some commenting her account was "fake" and others accusing her of spreading "propaganda". - Zhang Zhouxiang - chinadaily.com.cn

>>18865928 Video: Anthony Albanese visit to China on the table after Aussie timber ban lifted - Beijing’s top diplomat in Australia has revealed that talks are under way for Anthony Albanese to visit China “as quickly as possible”, amid improving trade relations between the countries after the lifting of punitive trade bans on $600m-a-year worth of Australian timber. China’s ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said there was “good momentum” in stabilising bilateral ties, and Chinese officials were working with their Australian counterparts to find “a time of mutual convenience” for the Prime Minister’s trip.

>>18865944 ‘China is not a threat': Ambassador Xiao Qian attacks Quad and AUKUS alliances as not in best interest of 'peace' in region - The Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian has declared that Beijing is “not a threat to Australia” as he condemned both the Quad and AUKUS alliances in the region. The first meeting of the Quad leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US to be held in Sydney was scrapped on Wednesday after President Joe Biden was forced to cancel his trip. Mr Xiao has labelled the alliance a “bad idea” and urged for the nations to “look at China objectively”.

>>18875151 Biden skips two legs of trip, erodes US credibility - The US President Joe Biden decided to curtail his upcoming trip to the Asia-Pacific by canceling a visit to Australia and Papua New Guinea due to the ongoing debt ceiling negotiations in Washington, which, some Chinese experts said reflects that Washington only treats its so-called allies and partners as chess pieces and instrument, and when its domestic issues override its political agenda, it easily turns back on its commitment. - Chen Qingqing and Xie Jun - globaltimes.cn

>>18875320 Chinese mouthpiece Global Times says Quad been dealt ‘fatal blow’ and is in crisis - The future of the Quad has been dealt a “fatal blow” and is in decline, China says, and it sets the stage for other “US-led anti-China cliques” to suffer the same fate. “If Western observers still believe in Quad, their analyses should be full of content about innovative ways to contain China and make the West great again,” the Global Times article stated. “There is no such wording, but only disappointment in the US.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928614

#29 - Part 53

Australia / China Tensions - Part 11

>>18875329 Cancellation of Sydney summit an omen of Quad's future fate - The planned Quad summit in Sydney, scheduled for May 24, has been canceled as Biden is busy putting out the financial fire of a possible debt default at home. The leaders will meet later this week on G7 sidelines in Japan instead. But, even though the gathering continues, it won't be the same. The cancellation of the Sydney summit is an omen of Quad's fate. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>18875383 Playing the long game on China trade - "There were high hopes, but Trade Minister Don Farrell arrived back from China empty-handed. Conversation was apparently amicable. We were given assurances Chinese review of tariffs against Australian barley imports is on track. That’s effectively Beijing telling us it will remove restrictions on Australian exports in its own good time and according to its own opaque priorities and principles. As usual, China is playing a longer game. We need to as well." - John Lee, non-resident senior fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington and former senior adviser to the Australian foreign minister, 2016 to 2018 - afr.com

>>18875410 Albanese confirms Beijing invite, says China must remove trade bans - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sharpened his calls for China to remove all remaining trade restrictions on Australia as he prepares to meet world leaders at the G7, where Beijing’s use of economic coercion will dominate key forums. Confirming for the first time that he has officially been invited to Beijing and that a Quad meeting has been scheduled in Hiroshima, Albanese said it was important “that any of the impediments to trade between China and Australia be lifted”.

>>18875476 Former defence chief Angus Houston hits out at China, warns of 'miscalculation' leading to possible military conflict - One of the co-authors of Labor's Defence Strategic Review has sharply criticised Beijing's growing military activity in the South China Sea, accusing the emerging superpower of undermining Australia's national interest. Just weeks after the release of the DSR, former defence chief Sir Angus Houston has also expressed concern about the lack of lethality with the Royal Australian Navy's surface fleet and blasted the slow progress in producing missiles locally.

>>18876559 Video: ‘Illegal, malign’: China’s state-sponsored crime stretches across Pacific - Australia’s key law enforcement partners have launched a blistering attack on the Chinese government, saying the state actor poses the gravest threat to the security of Australia and its allies, while alleging that Beijing is also green-lighting organised crime bosses as agents of influence in Pacific Island nations. The FBI has described US and Australian efforts to ramp up the Western law enforcement presence in the Pacific, marked most recently by the Albanese government’s $317 million “Pacific expansion” funding package for the AFP, as aimed in part at countering China’s own efforts in the Indo-Pacific.

>>18876597 OPINION: There is a reason why the AFP won’t call out China - "Kershaw’s careful language needs to be viewed in the prism of maintaining a flow of intelligence from Chinese authorities about drug shipments from triad syndicates that arrive on Australian shores every other week. His is an unenviable juggling act. Kershaw’s federal agents have run exhaustive investigations into espionage and foreign interference allegedly conducted by Beijing’s security services in Australia. At the same time, the AFP relies on information from these same security services to stop Australians dying of drug overdoses." - Nick McKenzie - theage.com.au

>>18880112 Albanese ‘to travel to China’ but opposition warns trade sanctions should be lifted first - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has told world leaders he intends to travel to China, signalling he will push ahead with stabilising the relationship with Beijing despite ongoing trade sanctions and the arbitrary detention of two Australians. Albanese has not publicly confirmed a date for the trip, but the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s first visit to China as prime minister in October is looming as a symbolic marker for Canberra and Beijing after years of disputes over human rights, national security and trade.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928616

#29 - Part 54

Australia / China Tensions - Part 12

>>18880118 ‘Ours must not be an era of war’: Quad leaders pledge investment in Asia Pacific - The Quad will build undersea cable systems and fund infrastructure development and telecommunications across the Asia Pacific in an expansion of its remit designed to blunt China’s growing influence in the region. The announcement by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Joe Biden was coupled with a pledge to put south-east Asian nations and the Pacific Islands at the centre of its plans after a campaign by Beijing to paint the four nations as elite and out of touch with developing countries.

>>18880124 ‘Unspeakable consequences’: Kevin Rudd’s warning on China war - Kevin Rudd has painted a grim picture for Hong Kong’s future as an increasingly “Leninist and Marxist” Chinese Communist Party erodes the island’s freedoms and a US-led coalition seeks to counteract Beijing’s growing military and economic might. In one of his first public remarks as ambassador to the US, Mr Rudd also said the US, Australia and other democracies were united in an “active campaign of expanded deterrence to cause Xi Jinping to think twice and thrice about whether [China] could get away with any unilateral military action against Taiwan”.

>>18890103 Maturity on China boosts our global status: Richard Marles - Australia is being treated “more seriously as a country” since the Albanese government ended the nation’s “shrill” political debate over China and began stabilising relations with Beijing, Richard Marles has declared. Mr Marles, branded by Scott Morrison a “Manchurian candidate” prior to last year’s election, said the previous government issued “gratuitous and inflammatory comments” about China without regard for the interests of the Australian people.

>>18890113 Foreign Minister Penny Wong says prime minister won't visit China unless 'progress' is made - Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong has indicated Prime Minister Anthony Albanese won't travel to China unless "continued progress" is made to resolve trade and consular disputes. The invite from Chinese officials was made earlier this year and follows clashes between the two countries, which have in particular severely hindered Australian exporters.

>>18890116 DJI drone fleet grounded by Border Force amid links to Chinese military - The Australian Border Force has stopped using drones from a Chinese manufacturer under review by the Defence Department and black-listed in the US, Home Affairs chief operating officer Justine Saunders has told Senate estimates. “We have actually suspended the use of that capability,” she said in response to questioning from opposition home affairs spokesperson James Paterson.

>>18890171 Concerns secret classification of detainee blocked bail - Senior lawyers argue the conditions faced by a former US fighter pilot accused of aiding the Chinese military are impeding his case for bail. Daniel Duggan is facing extradition to the United States, where he will face charges of violating arms export laws and money laundering, which he denies. The Australian section of the International Commission of Jurists wrote to the NSW Corrective Services Commissioner raising concerns about how Mr Duggan was classified as a high-risk detainee, with documents about the classification withheld. The letter said without the information about why he was classified as high-risk, he couldn't properly prepare a bail application.

>>18895087 Forrest group Walk Free warns of slavery threat in Australia's solar panel supply chains - A human rights group funded by mining magnate Andrew Forrest has warned of the rapidly rising risks of modern slavery and forced labour in the world's renewable energy supply chains. Walk Free, an arm of Mr Forrest's Minderoo Foundation, will today release a report outlining how Australia imports $US17.4 billion [$26 billion] of products that may have used coerced labour. And it is warning that renewable energy products led by solar are increasingly susceptible to the risks, particularly those made in China.

>>18900821 Australia, Five Eyes partners blame China for malicious hacking campaign - Australia and its fellow Five Eyes security partners have called out China for a major state-sponsored hacking operation targeting critical infrastructure networks in the United States. Technology giant Microsoft, which uncovered the hack, said the campaign had been active since the middle of 2021 and targeted critical infrastructure assets in Guam, an island in the west Pacific Ocean that is home to some of America’s most important military bases. Guam would be expected to play an important role in any future conflict between the US and China over the self-governing island of Taiwan.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928617

#29 - Part 55

Australia / China Tensions - Part 13

>>18900833 Video: Five countries secretly sharing intelligence say China is the No.1 threat - Showing off deadly weaponry in massive war games is a tactic China and the United States both use to try to avoid full-on combat. But the truth is the two countries, as well as other nations including Australia, are already battling it out in an invisible war. There are no frontline soldiers but there are significant skirmishes. Until now these conflicts have been kept quiet, but key members of a secretive alliance of top cops from Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand are about to change that. In exclusive interviews with Nick McKenzie, the group known as the “Five Eyes” disclose startling information about the trouble they’re seeing. - 60 Minutes Australia

>>18906146 Video: China hits back over Five Eyes blame for US infrastructure cyber attack - China has hit back after Australia and other Five Eyes cyber agencies blamed it for recent cyber attacks targeting "critical infrastructure" in the United States. "Obviously, this is a collective disinformation campaign by the United States to mobilise the Five Eyes countries for geopolitical purposes," China's foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said.

#29 - Part 56

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide

>>18670801 Video: China health officials lash out at WHO, defend search for source of COVID-19 virus - Chinese health officials have defended their search for the source of the COVID-19 virus and lashed out at the World Health Organization after its leader said Beijing should have shared genetic information earlier. The director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention's, Shen Hongbing, said the WHO comments were "offensive and disrespectful."

>>18703519 Thousands left waiting for compensation after claims of COVID-19 vaccine injury - Thousands of people are still waiting to learn whether they will receive compensation for injuries they believe they incurred when receiving a coronavirus vaccine, as claimants and lawyers say delays are causing unnecessary distress to people with serious illnesses. The COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme covers losses or expenses of $1000 or more from injury resulting in hospitalisation or death from specific severe reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine.

>>18800871 Ivermectin ban ended by Australian regulator amid warning it should not be used as Covid treatment - The Therapeutic Goods Administration has ended a ban on off-label prescriptions of anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, nearly two years after floods of people attempted to procure the drug in the mistaken belief it would treat Covid-19. The TGA announced on Wednesday it would remove the ban for off-label prescriptions of the drug from 1 June. Off-label prescriptions had been limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious disease specialists since September 2021. The decision was made due to what the TGA said was “sufficient evidence that the safety risks to individuals and public health is low” in the “current health climate”.

>>18875725 Australian school imposes a mask mandate after a Covid outbreak among students - sparking outrage from parents and top doctor: 'No child should be compelled to wear one' - A high school has brought back a Covid mask mandate more than six months after they were entirely scrapped across the country, sparking backlash. Liverpool Girls' High School in Sydney's southwest announced on Tuesday that Year 9, 10 and 11 students would have to work from home immediately, while all staff and students still in school would have to wear masks. Dr Nick Coatsworth, who is well known as the face of the government's Covid vaccine rollout, told Daily Mail Australia that mask rules being reintroduced at the school was worrying. 'That is a problem. No child at an Australian school should be compelled to wear a mask,' the former Australian deputy chief health officer said.

>>18880132 Warning winter could mark arrival of fifth Covid wave across Australia - A prominent epidemiologist says it is “obvious” Australia is heading into its fifth wave of Covid. Over the last week, 38,226 cases were reported across Australia, with an average of 5461 cases per day. University of South Australia Professor Adrian Esterman said it is already very clear a new wave is coming in South Australia, where infections are forecast to double in the next fortnight.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928619

#29 - Part 57

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

>>18795043 Billionaire Investor Buys Jeffrey Epstein’s Private Islands For $60 Million - A private equity mogul, who says he never met Epstein, plans to develop a luxury resort on the infamous property. After more than a year on the market, Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous Caribbean islands have finally found a buyer: Stephen Deckoff, founder of private equity firm Black Diamond Capital Management, has purchased the two islands for $60 million, less than half of their initial asking price of $125 million. Deckoff plans to develop a 25-room luxury resort on the property, he said Wednesday, adding that he never met Epstein and never set foot on the islands until they were marketed following Epstein’s 2019 death.

>>18795043 Q Post #1001 - Where do roads lead? Each prince is associated with a cardinal direction: north, south, east and west. Sacrifice. Collect. [Classified]-1 - [Classified]-2 - Tunnels. Table 29. D-Room H - D-Room R - D-Room C - Pure EVIL. 'Conspiracy' - Q

>>18805504 'God save Virginia Giuffre': Protesters wave placards on Coronation route - Protesters stood shoulder to shoulder with royal supporters - the former dressed in yellow waving placards with slogans including “king parasite” and “abolish the monarchy”, while the latter were bedecked in Union flags. One placard read: "God save Virginia Giuffre", a reference to the alleged sexual abuse case involving Prince Andrew, who settled a case with Giuffre in February last year.

>>18805504 Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q

>>18810233 Frozen-out Andrew gets an equally chilly reception from crowd - As the King travelled to Westminster Abbey in a golden carriage, to huge cheers and the drumbeat of a military procession, his brother, Prince Andrew, was driven down the Mall in a car alone - and booed by crowds. Andrew was reportedly “left in the dark” until the last moment about whether he would be allowed to wear his ceremonial Knight of the Garter robes - and was “furious”. In the end, the late Queen’s second son got his way, walking into the abbey in a floor-length velvet robe, red sash and gold tassels. In 2015, Virginia Giuffre claimed she was forced to have sex with Andrew when she was 17 and he was a guest of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Andrew has always denied the allegations. An out-of-court settlement was reached with Giuffre in March last year - a reported pounds 3 million - in which he accepted no blame.

>>18810233 Q Post #3152 - Prince Andrew is deeply connected. Q

>>18824096 Count Inland Vampire Tweet: Nothing is beating this today. Nada. Whoever owns this placard, I love you with all my heart. #notallheroeswearcapes #GodSaveVirginiaGuiffre @VRSVirginia - https://twitter.com/InlandEmpire777/status/1654831159941971969

>>18824096 Virginia Roberts Giuffre Tweet: Humbled ♥️

>>18875740 Deutsche Bank to pay $US75m to settle Jeffrey Epstein accusers’ suit - Deutsche Bank has agreed to pay $US75m ($113m) to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging the financial institution facilitated Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring, said lawyers who sued the bank on behalf of alleged victims. A woman who is listed anonymously as Jane Doe in court papers filed the suit last year in New York on behalf of herself and other accusers of the disgraced financier. She alleged Deutsche Bank did business with Epstein for five years while knowing that he was using money in his bank accounts to further his sex-trafficking activity.

>>18885246 Epstein threatened to reveal Bill Gates’ ‘affair’ with young Russian - Jeffrey Epstein threatened to expose Bill Gates over an alleged affair with a Russian bridge player in her 20s, according to reports in the US. Convicted paedophile Epstein, who killed himself in jail in 2019, wanted Gates to support a charity he had set up. Gates, 67, refused to do so, and Epstein threatened to expose the alleged affair unless he co-operated, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928624

#29 - Part 58

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 1

>>18693432 ‘Heads in sand’: Labor lashed over NT child sex abuse claims - The Coalition has dug in behind Peter Dutton’s assertion of widespread child sexual violence in central Australia, with Liberal senator Simon Birmingham and opposition deputy leader Sussan Ley calling on the federal government to stop playing politics and take action.

>>18698736 Labor under pressure for minimising sexual assault cases - The Fyles Labor government is facing claims it tried to minimise and even deny alarmingly high rates of child sex abuse in the Northern Territory when its Treasurer, Eva Lawler, told a radio station: “Children have been sexually abused in Australia since, bloody, the place was probably settled”.

>>18744576 Ex-governor-general Peter Hollingworth 'fit for ministry' despite misconduct, Anglican Church board finds - An Anglican Church investigation has found former governor-general Peter Hollingworth committed misconduct by knowingly allowing paedophiles to remain in the church when he was Brisbane archbishop, but is "fit for ministry" if he apologises to two victim-survivors. The Professional Standards Board of the Anglican Church has been considering whether Dr Hollingworth, who remains a bishop, should be defrocked over his handling of abuse cases while he was archbishop in the 1990s. It found that Dr Hollingworth committed misconduct by allowing two priests he knew had sexually abused children to remain in the church.

>>18749555 Abuse survivors slam Anglican Church ruling of ex governor-general Peter Hollingworth amid calls for re-investigation - Survivors of church abuse have slammed the finding of an Anglican Church investigation into former governor-general Peter Hollingworth and called for him to be re-examined by an independent body. Dr Hollingworth resigned as governor-general in 2003, following a series of revelations that he allowed paedophile priests to keep working while he was the Archbishop of Brisbane in the 1990s. On Monday (24 April 2023), an inquiry by the Professional Standards Board of the Anglican Church ruled Dr Hollingworth should not be stripped or defrocked of his holy orders, despite finding he committed misconduct by allowing two priests to remain in the church who he knew had sexually abused children.

>>18749567 Peter Hollingworth: ‘Ex-governor-general not fit to function as priest’, say lawyers - Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth should have been stripped of his permission to officiate as an Anglican minister due to serious misconduct and deficiency of character, according to lawyers for the internal investigation into his wrongdoing. Counsel for the church-created Professional Standards Committee submitted that Dr Hollingworth’s failings were so deep that he should not be able to function as a priest and that if his mission were ratified it would erode trust in the vocation. But the Anglican-inspired tribunal that judged Dr Hollingworth ultimately decided that, despite finding multiple counts of misconduct, the former Archbishop of Brisbane had been ignorant of the needs of child sex abuse victims rather than wilfully negligent.

>>18755037 Convicted pedophile teacher Malka Leifer to seek leniency in sentencing - Convicted pedophile teacher Malka Leifer is set to argue “hardship” she has experienced in prison and the threat of deportation to try to get a more lenient sentence. Leifer will face a two-day pre-sentencing hearing in June after she was found guilty earlier this month of 18 rape and sexual assault charges against students at the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick.

>>18760774 Video: ‘Paedophiles’: Protesters opposed to drag queen event hurl abuse at councillors - Protesters opposing a planned drag story time event have called councillors paedophiles and derailed a Monash City Council meeting on Wednesday after the south-eastern Melbourne council refused to give in to abuse and pressure to scrap the family-friendly activity. Key groups, such as My Place and Reignite Democracy Australia, which espouse views often associated with alt-right or conspiracy theory thinking and can be hostile to the LGBTQ community, rallied supporters to descend on Monash Council’s offices in Glen Waverley on Wednesday night to demand the cancellation of its sold-out drag queen event. The council-run event, planned for May 19 at Oakleigh Library, will involve drag queen Sam Thompson reading books and singing songs to children and parents to mark International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928625

#29 - Part 59

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 2

>>18784957 We must still stand strong against those who betray our kids - "Imagine discovering your 14-year-old child had suffered childhood sexual assaults by the parish priest at primary school; that the previous year of self-destructive behaviour and suicide attempts were a result of those ongoing assaults. Imagine the rage. Imagine discovering 20 months later that a second child of yours had been sexually assaulted by the same priest, then that the priest had been sexually assaulting children since the 1940s. And that, through many complaints over the years, the hierarchy, bishops and archbishops, knew all about his history of offending but had not stopped him, which led to your children being sexually assaulted almost 50 years later. We then learned that he was not the only pedophile clergyman of whom they were aware and protected. It caused a group of us parents to rage against the hierarchy for their deception, betrayal and culpability. On October 22, 2018, I had the great honour of sitting on the floor of Parliament House in Canberra with Julia Gillard on one side and my daughter Katie on the other to hear the national apology. It hit a spot deep inside many of us, as the broken sobbing of one woman proved when her cries echoed through the parliamentary chamber. The national apology was a triumph for all victims; it was recognition of what victims had suffered as defenceless children at the mercy of bishops, clergy and other heartless people who cared nothing for them. The people who knowingly harboured child rapists were wrong, vile and criminal, and the apology proved it to the nation. The carnage we experienced with our daughters must stop. It is every adult’s duty to be forever vigilant in protecting the children in their lives and beyond." - Chrissie Foster, author of 'Hell on the Way to Heaven' and 'Still Standing'. Member of the Order of Australia for significant service to children, particularly as an advocate for those who have suffered sexual abuse. - theaustralian.com.au

>>18784972 Righteous rage - The Catholic Church’s betrayal of children - 'Still Standing' by Chrissie Foster, with Paul Kennedy. - "This is a book about rage, as Chrissie Foster says in her opening sentence. It is motivated and driven by rage and, if this is not an oxymoron, it is a panegyric to rage. Few people could have more cause for rage than Foster, two of whose three daughters were raped at primary school in Melbourne by Catholic priest Kevin O’Donnell, a paedophile monster about whom the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne knew for fifty years yet did nothing. One of Chrissie’s daughters, Emma, took her own life, while the second, Katie, who turned to drink to cope, was left in a wheelchair after a car crash. As religion reporter for The Age, I often sat alongside the Fosters in the 2013 Victorian Parliamentary Inquiry into how institutions responded to child abuse, which they attended throughout. I knew the rage must be smouldering inside - it would be impossible not to be - but I was constantly impressed by their quiet, stoic dignity and the calm, rational way their passion was expressed. Three decades after first taking up the cudgels, she is still furious that the high-ranking clergy who enabled and prolonged the sex crimes ‘of adult holy men against the small bodies of children for an average of 2.2 years each child’ have not been held to account. ‘Justice has not yet been served. How can our criminal law allow the Church hierarchy to just walk away from what it heartlessly orchestrated for decades, for centuries?’ It is the bishops (and bureaucrats) who emerge as the worst villains in this story. What could be more shameful or sad; what could more justly inspire rage?" - Barney Zwartz, Australian Book Review, May 2023 - australianbookreview.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928631

#29 - Part 60

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 3

>>18775283 ‘Jesus won’t forget this’: Catholic Church sued over alleged abuse by late Father Joe Doyle - The Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne is being sued over the alleged sexual abuse of two school students in the 1970s and ’80s by a priest who was found by the church to be a paedophile in 2005 and continued to perform clerical duties for more than a decade. Father Joseph Doyle, who died in 2021, has been accused of sexual abuse by two former students of Our Lady of Lourdes Primary School in Bayswater, where he served as parish priest for 37 years until his abrupt departure in 2005. Doyle allegedly molested and raped an 8-year-old boy in 1979 after promising to make him captain of the school’s football team, according to a writ filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria against the church late last year.

>>18784952 Video: Hillsong Church Global Investigation | 7NEWS Spotlight Full Documentary - From Hillsong to Hellsong, shocking new revelations about Brian Houston’s megachurch. Victims speak out in Spotlight’s season return, in this full length documentary. It was once hailed as one of the most influential religious organisations in the Western World, a global megachurch, preaching a rock’n’roll brand of modern Christianity. But just as quickly as Hillsong and its controversial leaders became superstars and super powerful, child sex abuse scandals would bring down its founder, Frank Houston, implicate his son, Brian, and dirty the faith’s squeaky-clean image. Now, in an explosive season return of 7NEWS Spotlight, guest reporter Tom Tilley lifts the lid on shocking new allegations of abuse and corruption that will shake the church to its core.

>>18800846 Marist Brothers lose bid to use paedophile’s death as shield against child abuse claims - A Catholic order has lost its latest attempt to use the death of a known paedophile clergy member to shield itself from allegations of child sexual abuse after a judge found that allowing such a course would “bring the administration of justice into disrepute”. In recent months, the Guardian has revealed how the Catholic church, in particular its Marist Brothers and Christian Brothers orders, is increasingly using the deaths of clergy members to argue for permanent stays of cases brought by abuse survivors in the civil courts. The Marist Brothers argued that the death of notorious paedophile Brother Francis “Romuald” Cable rendered it unable to fairly defend itself from a civil claim by a survivor known by the pseudonym of Mark Peters, because it can no longer call Cable as a witness. The NSW supreme court rejected the church’s attempts to use Cable’s death to justify a permanent stay. “The defendant should not, in my view, have the benefit of its own inaction,” justice Nicholas Chen found.

>>18804767 Saucon Valley must allow After School Satan Club to meet, judge rules - Federal judge John Gallagher ruled Monday (May 1, 2023) the After School Satan Club can begin holding meetings at Saucon Valley Middle School. The long-awaited decision said the Saucon Valley School District violated the First Amendment when it revoked the club's approval. In his opinion, Judge Gallagher recognized the difficulty Superintendent Jaime Vlasaty faced following a shooting threat related to the Satan Club, calling her position "unenviable." But the judge also said the suppression of the club's speech was not "Constitutionally permissible." Now, more than two months after its approval was revoked, the club is planning to hold its first meeting as early as next week.

>>18804793 Video: Boston SatanCon-goers shred Bible, pro-cop flag during opening ritual: ‘Hail Satan!’ - A group of Satanists cheered as two leaders opened SatanCon 2023 on Friday with a formal ceremony renouncing "symbols of oppression" by ripping up a Bible and a "Thin Blue Line" flag representing police. "We stand here today in defiance of their siege and destroy their symbols of oppression," a female leader told the crowd before ripping pages out of the Bible and throwing them on the floor, video showed. A male leader joined her in then tearing a "Thin Blue Line" flag in two, which they also tossed on the floor while the crowd cheered. Satanists in attendance later picked some of the ripped pages off the floor and posed with them for pictures.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928635

#29 - Part 61

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 4

>>18804800 Video: Un-Baptism Ceremony Held at "Biggest Satanic Gathering" at Boston SatanCon - An Un-Baptism ceremony was held at The Little Black Chapel of Satanic Temple during the 10th anniversary SatanCon event in Boston on Friday afternoon. Earlier in the day a satanic naming ceremony was held at the Marriott in Boston for the 10th annual SatanCon. Individuals walked up to a center altar where they chose a name to be identified by and the group chanted, "hail Satan." The individuals then received an upside-down cross on their foreheads before making devil horns with their hands and walking toward a cheering crowd.

>>18804816 Q Post #4627 - One party discusses God. One party discusses Darkness. One party promotes God. One party eliminates God. Symbolism will be their downfall. The Great Deceiver(s).

>>18804816 Q Post #4429 - The Armor of God - Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Have faith in Humanity. Have faith in Yourself. Have faith in God. The Great Awakening. Q

>>18804816 Q Post #4396 - God wins. Q

>>18814655 Surge in sex abuse cases drives Catholic Church insurer to seek bailout - The Catholic Church’s insurer is considering winding down its ­operations unless another substantial bailout is made by dioceses and religious orders to plug the hole caused by sex abuse cases. Catholic Church Insurance is discussing closing its new and renewal general insurance business amid a continuing surge in abuse claims as well as the liability ­impacts of factors such as Australia’s erratic weather. The church hierarchy has been told the capital injection is needed about 18 months after shareholders pumped $170m into CCI to help cover sex abuse claims, amid significant losses.

>>18819570 Video: Victims of paedophile Rolf Harris, 93, speak out as new documentary shows the moment pervert jokes with Jimmy Savile about keeping little girl 'safe' - A new ITVX documentary has unearthed disturbing footage of Rolf Harris joking with Jimmy Savile about leaving a little girl 'safely in his arms'. The popular TV hosts - who, unbeknownst to audiences, were both prolific sex offenders - were filmed together in an episode of Savile's BBC series Jim'll Fix It in 1976. The clip shows Savile reading a letter submitted by a little girl named Lynn, requesting to watch Harris as creates one of his famous paintings. The young girl is then seen on stage with the pair as Savile jokingly asks Harris if he may 'leave her in your charge?' Harris pipes back: 'Safely leave her in my capable hands here…'

>>18835321 Peter Hollingworth surrenders permission to officiate as Anglican minister - Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth will surrender his church authority to officiate after another wave of condemnation over his mishandling of child sex abuse cases, saying the move was to alleviate survivor suffering and heal divisions in the Anglican Church. Dr Hollingworth told the Anglican Archbishop of Melbourne, Philip Freier, this week that he was returning his Permission to Officiate, just weeks after an internal church-instigated legal board found him guilty on multiple misconduct charges while running the church in the Diocese of Brisbane between 1990 and 2001.

>>18840662 ‘It’s probably easier to stay in the anger than to be vulnerable’ - Chrissie Foster, 67, fought the Catholic Church with her late husband Anthony for two decades after two of their three daughters were raped by their priest. Their youngest, Aimee, 38, escaped the abuse but not the fallout.

>>18844670 Former Melbourne Demons footballer Daniel Hayes serves Supreme Court writ on AFL and junior coach Mark Heaney - In a Victorian Supreme Court writ served on the AFL and former Eastern Ranges' assistant coach Mark Heaney this week by Daniel Hayes's lawyers, Arnold Thomas Becker, Hayes alleged that, following a boozy post-game barbecue at the home of Heaney, he was "raped" by Heaney after other guests had left. The court documents allege that: "As a result of the abuse, [Daniel Hayes] self-medicated with drugs and alcohol. He has made three suicide attempts" and "but for the abuse, [Daniel Hayes] would have continued with the Melbourne Demons". In response to questions from the ABC about Hayes's allegation, Heaney said: "I deny that. I had a professional relationship with him as a trainee and player."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928637

#29 - Part 62

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 5

>>18844722 Court documents reveal coach accused of raping former Melbourne player Daniel Hayes was a long-time AFL employee who coached Sydney Swans academy teams - A former elite junior football coach has been accused by former AFL player Daniel Hayes of rape back in 2005 and a writ has been lodged in the Victorian Supreme Court seeking damages. Mark Patrick Heaney was a senior AFL employee who played a crucial role in the code's expansion into New South Wales and coached Sydney Swans academy teams for three years. Heaney, who was the AFL's Northern New South Wales regional manager between 2009 and 2013, lost his job with the league in 2014 when he was convicted and jailed for grooming a 13-year-old junior footballer in 2013.

>>18844736 Video: Former Demon Daniel Hayes accused assistant coach of rape - Our next story may distress some viewers. A former Melbourne Demons rookie is suing the AFL and a former employee claiming in a Victorian Supreme Court writ that he was raped as a 17-year-old in 2005 by his assistant coach at the Eastern Ranges, Mark Heaney. A standout junior Daniel Hayes was drafted by the Demons the following year but never played a game after being cut from the club's list for repeatedly missing training. The writ, which was lodged this week, details his spiral into drug and alcohol abuse and his mental health struggles in the years since his AFL dream ended. - ABC NEWS (Australia)

>>18844758 Video: Former Melbourne Demons recruit Daniel Hayes suing AFL, coach over alleged rape as club junior - A former Melbourne Demons recruit is suing the AFL and a former coach of his from a junior football league, who he alleges sexually assaulted him after a game when he was a teenager. Daniel Hayes alleges that his former assistant coach of the Eastern Ranges, Mark Heaney, got him drunk and then raped him while Hayes was at a barbeque at Heaney's house when he was 17. "I put a lot of trust into Mark," Hayes told 9News. Heaney has publicly denied the claims and no charges have been laid.

>>18875613 Former Joondalup Health Campus CEO Kempton Cowan pleads guilty over child sex abuse videos - The former head of one of Western Australia's largest hospitals is facing a jail term after pleading guilty to accessing, soliciting and transmitting child abuse material. Kempton Cowan, 56, the one-time chief executive officer of the Joondalup Health Campus, appeared in the Magistrates Court and pleaded guilty to a total of 11 charges.

>>18875625 Peter Hollingworth’s decision to cease practising as a priest not enough, abuse survivors say - Abuse survivors are maintaining a push for Peter Hollingworth to be defrocked despite the former archbishop’s decision to cease practising as a priest, urging the Anglican church to “finally do the right thing”. In deciding to hand back his permission to officiate, Hollingworth acknowledged his continuing role in the church was a “cause of pain to survivors” and said he wanted to end the distress. But Beth Heinrich, an abuse survivor whose complaint against Hollingworth was central to the church’s internal complaints process, has written to the church’s professional standards committee, warning it against considering the decision as a “satisfactory outcome”.

>>18875802 Pennsylvania gets its first after-school Satan Club this week. In Hellertown. - The club, for kids 5-12, promises science and community service projects, nature activities, and tons of fun. “Educatin’ with Satan,” as they say. - This week, kids in the Lehigh Valley will get to join in a different kind of after-school program. You could say it had a hell of a time getting there. A federal judge has ordered that the Saucon Valley School District - located, ironically, in Hellertown - must allow the After School Satan Club, sponsored by The Satanic Temple, to meet on its property. It will be the first After School Satan Club in Pennsylvania. New Jersey and Delaware currently have no After School Satan Clubs. So far, six students have signed up for the club and more are expected.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928639

#29 - Part 63

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 6

>>18875811 After School Satan Clubs gain popularity amid legal victories - After School Satan Clubs have been steadily increasing in popularity and are not likely to slow as their supporters rack up media attention and legal wins fighting for free speech. The clubs, associated with the Satanic Temple and offered only in primary schools, began at the beginning of 2020 and quickly gained attention from parents who wanted an alternative to religious clubs, according to June Everett, campaign director of the After School Satan Club. “That’s kind of when things started blowing up. And I anticipate that every year moving forward is going to get busier and busier,” Everett told The Hill.

>>18875822 'Big plans for next school year': After School Satan Club looks to expand to high schools - An after-school club connected to the Satanic Temple is looking to expand to high schools, and the club's campaign director, June Everett said it has "big plans" for next school year. A new partnership between the club and the nonprofit group Secular Student Alliance could help expand the club's availability to other schools, including high schools. The Secular Student Alliance states on its website that it is the only national organization dedicated to atheist, humanist, and other nontheist students.

>>18875825 Video: 'After School Satan Club' holds first meeting - In the Lehigh Valley, the "After School Satan Club" held its first meeting following a court battle between the Satanic Temple and the Saucon Valley School District. The Satanic Temple was given the green light by a federal court earlier this month that it is the club's constitutional right to use Saucon Valley School District's middle school as its meeting place to gather. - WNEP-TV Pennsylvania

>>18875853 Satanists Sue Chicago For Not Allowing Them To Say ‘Hail Satan’ At City Council Meetings - Local Satanists are raising hell with a new lawsuit alleging the city is barring them from saying “Hail Satan” at City Council meetings. The lawsuit, filed this month by the Satanic Temple, says the city violated the religious group’s First Amendment rights by “excluding disfavored minority faiths” from giving an invocation at the start of City Council meetings. The Satanic Temple is a federally recognized religion with congregations across the United States and more than 14,000 members in Illinois, and it should be allowed to solemnize City Council just like any other religion, Minister of Satan Adam Vavrick, said.

>>18875856 Q Post #4942 - https://time.com/collection/great-reset/ - This is not about R v D. This is about preserving our way of life. If America falls, the World falls. Patriots on guard. Q

>>18894975 Video: Rolf Harris, disgraced former entertainer and convicted paedophile, dies aged 93 - The family of disgraced former entertainer and convicted paedophile Rolf Harris has revealed he died nearly two weeks ago at the age of 93. Harris's death was listed as both neck cancer and "fragility from old age". The 93-year-old died at his home in Berkshire on May 10, but the death was only registered in the UK on Tuesday. Once one of Australia's most famous celebrity exports - renowned as a television presenter, musician and painter - Harris was prosecuted in 2013 for indecent assault against girls and young women between 1968 and 1986.

>>18894986 Convicted paedophile Rolf Harris’ death may unleash new wave of allegations - The multimillion-dollar estate of disgraced entertainer Rolf Harris is bracing for a flood of new claims and allegations against the Australian after his family announced his death from cancer in Britain. Fresh allegations against the sex offender have been aired as recently as March, when a Melbourne woman claimed she was assaulted 40 years ago after he performed at a camp at Mount Eliza on the Mornington Peninsula.

>>18895074 Police officer who led investigation into Brittany Higgins's rape allegation reveals he is sexual assault survivor - The head investigator into Brittany Higgins's allegation that she had been raped has revealed he is a survivor of sexual assault. Detective Superintendent Scott Moller disclosed the information on his third day of giving evidence to an ACT board of inquiry, which is examining the conduct of criminal justice agencies in the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann. Wrapping up his time providing evidence, Superintendent Moller's lawyer, Matt Black, asked him what life experience he brought to his role with ACT police. Superintendent Moller told the inquiry that 45 years ago he was sexually assaulted. "I'm a survivor," he said. "That has driven my desire to make sure [other victims are supported]."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928641

#29 - Part 64

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 7

>>18900789 Melbourne couple allegedly kept domestic slave at Point Cook home - A couple have been charged with modern-day slavery offences after they allegedly kept a woman as a domestic slave at their home in Melbourne’s south-western suburbs for about 10 months. A healthcare worker raised the alarm with authorities last October after noticing the woman was “exhibiting indicators of human trafficking”. Australian Federal Police alleges the woman was kept in domestic servitude at the Point Cook home from January and until October 2022, when federal officers swooped on the property following the tip-off. Officers allege the 44-year-old man and 29-year-old woman exercised coercive control over the victim, limited her movements and physically assaulted her.

>>18900794 Point Cook couple faces court accused of harbouring a slave - A Point Cook couple has faced court accused of keeping a slave in a western suburbs home after medical staff contacted police with concerns a woman may have been a victim of human trafficking. Angie Yeh Ling Liaw, 29, and Chee Kit Chong, 44 - also known as Max Chong - faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday charged with three slavery-related offences. They include allegations the married couple possessed a slave and used coercion and threats to control the female at their home in Melbourne’s west.

>>18900811 Peter Hollingworth will never officiate in Australia as Anglican church body dumps plans to appeal inquiry findings - Former governor-general Peter Hollingworth will never officiate in the Anglican Church anywhere in Australia after investigators threatened to appeal a board decision to allow him to have a limited role in services. The Anglican diocese of Melbourne’s Professional Standards Committee has revealed it was preparing to appeal the board findings that would have paved the way for Dr Hollingworth to officiate in a qualified way in Melbourne. But on May 12, Dr Hollingworth announced his intention to return his permission to officiate and this was accepted by the church on May 19.

>>18906203 Video: Pain lingers for victims of Puffing Billy child abuser - Twelve-year-old Sam* stood watching level crossing railway works on a busy Camberwell road the day he first met by chance the man who would become his abuser. Child sex offender Anthony John Hutchins, then aged 33, struck up a conversation with the boy and discovered they both loved railways, asking the child if he wanted to join him as a volunteer at tourist attraction Puffing Billy in 1975. Within weeks, Hutchins began collecting the child and driving him to and from the Belgrave railway, before repeatedly sexually abusing the boy in an engine shed, his car and even the child’s own home over the following four years. On Friday May 26, an 81-year-old Hutchins appeared in the County Court of Victoria after pleading guilty to sexual offending against two boys. “Looking back I feel cheapened by the memories I now realise was in effect grooming. The vulnerability I had as a child, the common interest I had in trains … made me an easy target,” Sam said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928644

#29 - Part 65

Qanon / Conspiracy Theory Hit Pieces, Australia and Worldwide

>>18714072 Tarnished Trump may hand Biden a new term - "Joe Biden has always been underestimated and his political obituary written and rewritten. But Biden, with a string of accomplishments and almost certain to face Donald Trump, has as good a chance of re-election as any president despite his advanced age. Trump was a criminal businessman and criminal president who committed high treason against the US when he sought to undermine and then overturn the 2020 election. Trump was a terrible president who diminished US global standing by weakening alliances and disastrously managed the pandemic response. (Anyone for an injection of bleach?)" - Troy Bramston - theaustralian.com.au

>>18755069 Video: Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch face another giant legal claim over Fox News 'disinformation' - The lawyer representing voting technology company, Smartmatic, says Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch are key to the $US2.7 billion ($4.05 billion) case they have brought against Fox News and Fox Corporation. The US cable news network is accused of spreading disinformation in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, in support of Donald Trump's false claims the election was stolen. "Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch, from our perspective, are front and centre to the decision making that was done at Fox Corporation that allowed and encouraged this type of disinformation," Erik Connolly told 7.30.

>>18795008 Rupert’s our ‘deadliest export’, Trump’s an egomaniac bully, says Turnbull - Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has described Rupert Murdoch as Australia’s deadliest export, saying no one has done more to damage American democracy than the US-based media mogul. And as Donald Trump’s campaign to return to the White House builds momentum, Turnbull also gave his frank assessment of the former president, branding him a “shameless showman” and a “bully” whose lies about the 2020 election being stolen constituted “gaslighting on an epic scale”. Speaking at an event hosted by Heather Ridout, Australia’s new consul-general in New York, and titled “Defending Democracy”, Turnbull told the audience: “What we saw in this country was a government that was nearly overthrown in a coup promoted by the president - and in an environment that was enabled by Fox News and other right-wing media. I say this without any sense of hyperbole: I do not believe that there is any individual alive today that has done more damage to American democracy than Rupert Murdoch. You might say [he’s] Australia’s deadliest export.” - Farrah Tomazin - smh.com.au

>>18855376 OPINION: Trump’s ‘evil charisma’ menaces the US, and Australia - "A resurrected Trump would feel emboldened to follow his instincts, making him more unpredictable and dangerous than his first term. America would again become a climate laggard and its support for Ukraine’s fight against Russia would be in doubt. The implications for Australia would be especially profound given how tightly enmeshed the two nations have become in response to China’s rise to superpower status. A Trump tantrum about handing over America’s precious Virginia-class submarines would unravel the AUKUS pact and leave Australia’s maritime security badly exposed. An increasing number of Australians would question the long-term value of the US alliance. A Trump victory in 2024 would be an almighty cataclysm. It’s happened before and can happen again." - Matthew Knott - theage.com.au

>>18885282 Biased FBI, complicit media failed US democracy in pursuit of Donald Trump and Russia election hoax - "The release of the much-anticipated Durham report in the US has laid out in shocking detail how a conversation between former Australian foreign minister Alexander Downer and Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos, in a London wine bar in 2016, led to the greatest case of election interference in US history. A highly politicised FBI seized on a vague paragraph, provided by the Australian government, that indicated Papadopoulos had said Russia could help the Trump campaign with the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton. Whatever Trump’s flaws and his later misdeeds, he didn’t deserve this, and his supporters are right to be furious." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928650

File: be56f4ab657c907⋯.jpg (70.28 KB,400x400,1:1,OZ_Pepe.jpg)

File: 49c9e47c7fb3569⋯.jpg (232.75 KB,841x514,841:514,Q_479.jpg)

File: ccb3ea3d2932b3c⋯.jpg (300.17 KB,842x828,421:414,Q_908.jpg)

File: a6f1a731b3eccc9⋯.jpg (136.57 KB,842x302,421:151,Q_910.jpg)

PREVIOUSLY COLLECTED NOTABLES

Q Research AUSTRALIA #29 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/7345bbf2

Q Research AUSTRALIA #28 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/f55ec192

Q Research AUSTRALIA #27 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/0b34604e

Q Research AUSTRALIA #26 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/9061e982

Q Research AUSTRALIA #25 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/767a7ba2

Q Research AUSTRALIA #24 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/8aa647c3

Q Research AUSTRALIA #23 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d8746531

Q Research AUSTRALIA #22 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/0c91380d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #21 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d1699b6f

Q Research AUSTRALIA #20 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/dd402760

Q Research AUSTRALIA #19 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/c2a98b43

Q Research AUSTRALIA #18 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/2ea866f7

Q Research AUSTRALIA #17 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/1df91700

Q Research AUSTRALIA #16 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/805b4829

Q Research AUSTRALIA #15 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/f975dc35

Q Research AUSTRALIA #14 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/62cdd4fd

Q Research AUSTRALIA #13 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d2399cda

Q Research AUSTRALIA #12 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/558b72b8

Q Research AUSTRALIA #11 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/c17ab97f

Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/bb780c9d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #9 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/6a61bec5

Q Research AUSTRALIA #8 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/7ee89fce

Q Research AUSTRALIA #7 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/239e467c

Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/c4932ea1

Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/5941506b

Q Research AUSTRALIA #4 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/acf74c16

Q Research AUSTRALIA #3 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/2021ac89

Q Research AUSTRALIA #2 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/b8855384

Q Research AUSTRALIA #1 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/1e0dcd6e

THREAD ARCHIVES

Q Research AUSTRALIA #29 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/u2vKS

Q Research AUSTRALIA #28 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/cXDww

Q Research AUSTRALIA #27 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/KZ6Y0

Q Research AUSTRALIA #26 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/dJnda

Q Research AUSTRALIA #25 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/mWRzL

Q Research AUSTRALIA #24 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/uytYA

Q Research AUSTRALIA #23 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/R5AIe

Q Research AUSTRALIA #22 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/vwtO9

Q Research AUSTRALIA #21 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/Si585

Q Research AUSTRALIA #20 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/Q7NNa

Q Research AUSTRALIA #19 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/elcTK

Q Research AUSTRALIA #18 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/oV4MT

Q Research AUSTRALIA #17 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/NtfuF

Q Research AUSTRALIA #16 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/PFwgE

Q Research AUSTRALIA #15 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/5hP7I

Q Research AUSTRALIA #14 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/A85E8

Q Research AUSTRALIA #13 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/rdbq6

Q Research AUSTRALIA #12 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/PahoV

Q Research AUSTRALIA #11 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/VoY1C

Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/lmbJh

Q Research AUSTRALIA #9 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/gOsSc

Q Research AUSTRALIA #8 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/xYtqT

Q Research AUSTRALIA #7 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/YT76p

Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/DGknZ

Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/vlHWs

Q Research AUSTRALIA #4 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/B0Z4l

Q Research AUSTRALIA #3 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/xznbY

Q Research AUSTRALIA #2 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/hlJ0W

Q Research AUSTRALIA #1 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/vJ8oH

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928654

File: fc03f2897a3cf42⋯.jpg (3.11 MB,2800x2000,7:5,Chairman_of_the_Joint_Chie….jpg)

CURRENT DOUGH

https://controlc.com/21028468

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928670

File: 33fc375fdac84b8⋯.jpg (335.83 KB,2048x1536,4:3,There_is_no_question_that_….jpg)

Indigenous Voice to Parliament: There has never been a political alignment like this

An alliance of elites is urging the Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament upon a wary and suspicious Australian public. Reconciliation cannot be achieved by division.

PAUL KELLY - May 27, 2023

1/4

In post-war Australia there has rarely, if ever, been a political alignment like this. Our elites have come together – political, corporate, financial, university, media, sporting, trade union and religious – to persuade and intimidate the Australian people to put an Indigenous voice to parliament into the Constitution.

They invoke the injustice, dispossession, intolerable disadvantage and the torment of Indigenous powerlessness in the cause of a new Indigenous institution with vast representative powers to be inserted into the Australian Constitution with transforming consequences for our governance.

In an impassioned and defiant speech this week Anthony Albanese has dismissed any further modifications to the constitutional amendment to arrest the decline in the Yes vote though most polls still have the Yes case in front. The Prime Minister is convinced the tide of history is with him and that Australia will empower Indigenous people in a vote that is about “recognition and listening”.

An architect of the voice, Noel Pearson, has made clear the Indigenous leaders behind the concept will accept no retreat – and Albanese cannot promote a referendum the Indigenous leaders won’t endorse. In effect, he seems to be an enthusiastic political hostage, passionately embracing his mission.

The majority report of the parliamentary committee with its absurdly inadequate six-week review of the proposed referendum found “no basis” for concerns. The dissenting report from Liberal MPs recommended radical surgery on the bill, warning its “uncertainty and risk” – including the risk that government could become “unworkable” – constitute permanent dangers if the referendum is adopted unamended.

Albanese’s calculation and gamble is that the mass endorsement of the Yes cause by elite institutions and bodies backed by financial power in the advertising campaign will deliver the public.

The nation confronts an unparalleled contest between an alliance of elites and a public that is wary and suspicious, increasingly resentful of the pressure to do the “polite” thing. Many Australians see the Yes campaign as well-intentioned deception. They feel they are not being levelled with but patronised, their goodwill exploited. The more the Yes campaign is scrutinised, the more the scale of serial deception is apparent.

This is a government that refused to convene a constitutional convention, refused to authorise a full-scale parliamentary assessment at the outset, made no early effort to achieve bipartisanship, declined to legislate the voice first to test its viability and decided the details of the voice would be released after the referendum, not before.

There have been 44 referendums since Federation. Labor has sponsored 25 for one success. Albanese with the voice has broken every rule in the book about winning referendums in the belief Australia has changed fundamentally and that past norms are obsolete. If the referendum fails it will be Albanese’s responsibility given the astonishing and dogmatic tactics he has pursued.

In its 2017 final report the Referendum Council identified the principles to guide the referendum, the first being to contribute to “a more unified and reconciled nation”. Father Frank Brennan, whose calls to modify the amendment have been spurned, said a decisive test was whether it united Australians. We know the answer. The polls, the policy and legal disputes, the formal opposition of the Liberal and National parties show the voice singularly fails that test. This is a deeply divisive proposal.

Reconciliation cannot be achieved by division. It cannot be achieved by Labor demanding people fall into line. It cannot be achieved by elites, assuming their superior morality, lecturing the people about how their country must be changed in perpetuity – that is the guaranteed path to backlash. Yet it is now rife throughout Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928671

File: 64204828c09e3a4⋯.jpg (159.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,Megan_Davis_Pat_Anderson_a….jpg)

>>18928670

2/4

The 2018 Dodson-Leeser jointly chaired parliamentary committee reported “no fewer than 18 different constitutional amendment” variations, but Labor is putting a radical model of the voice that divides the nation on principle, morality and equality. In his Thursday speech on the referendum bill Albanese was aggressive and political, with any hope of a shared approach now long gone and the country heading into a destructive struggle over a fundamental change to its Constitution.

At heart, Albanese’s speech was an emotional appeal based on the unacceptable plight and shocking disadvantage of Indigenous people – he argued that after “100 years of expensive well-intentioned failure by governments” it was overdue to grant Indigenous people the proposed voice.

Emotion is justified at this time. But it is a mistake for the country to make such a defining constitutional change – probably the most far-reaching in our history – on emotion. The vibe is designed to deceive and dodge the pivotal question: what is the meaning of the power being created? This is the issue.

The heart of this proposal ties recognition and the voice together. Recognition could be achieved in many ways. But it is the voice that matters in this referendum. Most opponents of the referendum support recognition but they cannot support the voice. The tactics of the Yes campaign so far are to run on recognition and downplay, even ignore, the voice, the essence of the constitutional change.

It is an effort to deceive the public on the fundamental question. Labor and the elites supporting the referendum need to be held to account. A campaign based on significant deception needs to be rejected at the first stage.

The voice is a group rights body, a political body, being enshrined in an entirely new chapter of the Constitution – the first referendum to create a new chapter – but given the power to make representations across the entire range of parliament and government, cabinet, ministers, public servants, not just on laws and policies that mainly relate to Indigenous people but laws and policies of general applications since Indigenous people are part of the overall community.

There has never been any concept like this before. As the recently departed barrister David Jackson, of immense High Court experience, said: the amendment means “we become a nation where, whenever we or our ancestors first came to this country, we are not all equal”.

The notion of an equal citizenship is terminated. This is the consequence of implanting in the Constitution a group rights body that represents one group of Australians for the specific purpose of giving this body unique access to advise, influence and determine public policy across the board.

Don’t be fooled by constant assurances, reminiscent of Joh Bjelke-Petersen, that there’s nothing to see here. There’s everything to see. The voice is about power. Only one thing counts: the words of the amendment and the powers being created. This penetrates to the far more serious deception of the Yes case – the pretence, as maintained by the Prime Minister, that this is merely about courtesy, that it’s just about the people accepting the “gracious” invitation by Indigenous Australians to give them a voice.

What does the voice mean in power and constitutional terms? It means a new constitutionally sanctioned entity that functions as an extra stream of advice and influence on virtually any issues it chooses to the parliament and government above and beyond the advice and influence enjoyed by all other Australians through existing constitutional processes – this distinction being based on race.

People employed by the elite institutions that campaign for Yes have every right to ask questions of their bosses. What is your justification for supporting this? How is this not divisive? How is this consistent with equality? What is the moral rationale of your position?

One answer is that Indigenous leaders are asking for this. It is a valid answer. But as Jackson said in his brief submission to the joint committee: “The issue is what the people of Australia want.” The Constitution does not belong to any group. It belongs to all Australians regardless of race. This is not just what Indigenous people want; it is what all Australians want.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928673

File: 71e93f5facac03d⋯.jpg (65.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Emotion_is_justified_at_th….jpg)

>>18928671

3/4

Pivotal to this issue is the determination of the Yes camp that the voice exists in perpetuity. This is not a ministerial decision that can be made and unmade at the stroke of a pen, not about a law that can be modified or repealed, not about voting for Liberal or Labor for a parliamentary term. It’s entirely different – it’s forever. Cross this constitutional threshold and there’s no return.

In his submission, Jackson asked: “Why should there be, in perpetuity, a voice entrenched constitutionally?” If it’s to rectify disadvantage it should be temporary since we assume the gap will be eventually closed. The implication is apparent: the First Nations people have a sovereign right to a voice and the voice is the first stage leading to a treaty and truth-telling that will raise questions about sovereignty.

The real intent is revealed in having a new chapter of the Constitution – chapter 1X – created for the voice. It sits with the institutions of nationhood: parliament (chapter one), executive (chapter two), judiciary (chapter three). The voice is enshrined as a core institution of state and that must influence High Court interpretation. The expectation is obvious: the voice is expected to change the way Australia is governed, with former chief justice, Robert French seeing it as a “significant institution in our representative democracy”.

The Yes advocates dismiss the idea of the voice as institutional separation based on race. Highly respected legal figures French and Geoffrey Lindell in their joint submission say “the voice is not about race” but “about our First Peoples as the Indigenous people of Australia”. It is a critical distinction but unpersuasive for most people. Surely the voice is both: it is about the First Peoples and it is about race. How can it not be?

Australian Human Rights Commissioner Lorraine Finlay said of the proposal: “It inserts race into the Australian Constitution in a way that undermines the foundational human rights principles of equality and non-discrimination.”

In terms of institutional operations the most alarming aspect of the voice is its virtually unlimited scope. The voice can make representations on welfare, law and order, human rights, incarceration rates, health, education, resources and mining, climate change, employment, the National Disability Insurance Scheme, foreign policy, sexual abuse, defence facilities and finance, to name just some. This is not to say the voice won’t do many good things and make many good recommendations. Of course it will. But that’s not the issue.

The issue – and it needs to be repeated – is the power being created and how that power changes our system of government.

“The scope of the voice is its strength,” said one of its Indigenous architects, Megan Davis, in a joint article with Gabrielle Appleby published in this paper. They were explicit. The voice “is not limited to matters specifically or directly related to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”. The wide scope for the voice is designed to maximise its power.

The Indigenous leaders are honest. The message from Davis is that parliament will not be able to “shut the voice up”. The parliament can only legislate for the voice consistent with the constitutional amendment that empowers the voice. The parliament is not in full control. It cannot, as Peter Dutton said, “out-legislate the Constitution” – it cannot limit or wind back the powers of the voice. There is no “buyer’s remorse” option once the voice is approved.

Davis and Appleby said the voice would speak to “all parts of government” statutory offices and agencies. This could include the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Centrelink, the Ombudsman and the Reserve Bank. The voice can be proactive. It won’t wait to be asked. How long, do you imagine, before it advises on a change to Australia Day? How long before it delivers advice on what should be taught in schools?

People shouldn’t be intimidated by elites saying this is running a scare campaign. It isn’t. Such warnings are justified by the power being created. The Yes campaign has no basis to argue that powers being created won’t be used and, if it tries, that’s another deception.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928674

File: 05c866fe1ac1223⋯.jpg (146.57 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_group_of_indigenous_acti….jpg)

>>18928673

4/4

The dilemma of the Yes campaign is obvious. It needs to disguise and deny the power it seeks to enshrine in the voice. This was apparent from Albanese’s speech when he mocked the No campaign for its “wild claims” about “what the voice will concern itself with”.

Albanese’s problem is that the public might grasp that this is a group rights body with its core functions constitutionally untouchable but able to give advice across the entire ambit of government. If the public grasps that core point it will vote No.

The French-Lindell submission is aware of this sensitivity when it says the voice can cover a broad range of matters but its limits are “likely to be defined by common sense and political realities”. The point is, they don’t know. The voice will have its own views about common sense and political realities. Is Labor fool enough to think Indigenous politicians won’t press to the limit the powers granted by popular vote?

Sadly, much of the discussion about the voice is conducted in a fog of utopian unreality generated by a media that prefers not to ventilate a robust, open-ended discussion. Assessing the scope for the voice, former High Court judge Ian Callinan went to the drafting: “It should be carefully noted that the proposed amendment is unqualified; it does not say core matters, or matters wholly, predominately, substantially, partially, exclusively, essentially, basically, largely, entirely, currently, broadly, especially, or even beneficially related to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People. Everything is at large.”

Dutton has been attacked for opposing the voice. The reality is that the Coalition parties have never had ownership in the voice project. It has been opposed by Tony Abbott, John Howard, Malcolm Turnbull (as prime minister), Scott Morrison and now Dutton.

The Opposition Leader’s objections this week were in terms of principle and workability, and to a large extent they remain unanswered. Dutton rejects Albanese’s claims the voice is a modest proposal and calls it “the most radical and consequential change” to our democracy in history. This might be debatable but there can be no doubt this is not a modest proposal.

The process has been flawed, the model is surrounded by legal disputes and there are legitimate concerns it will vastly complicate our governance and undermine classical liberal principles of citizenship equality that are fundamental to our society.

Once created, the voice would be a functioning political body vested with a moral mandate. It will become enmeshed with policy both in early stages and final stages. Any notion it will agree on everything is fatuous. How representative it becomes of Indigenous views is unknown.

As a political institution it will be involved in negotiations, dealing-making and public disputes. It will be a focus of media attention and obviously exploit the media for its ends. As Albanese once conceded, when the voice takes a strong stand it will be difficult for government to resist it. Just imagine the coverage the ABC would provide when the voice challenges the government or parliament? The voice will be a new arm in our governance system.

The upshot is that Australians will have different democratic rights based on race and ancestry. Our governance will increasingly incorporate separatist debates based on Indigenous and racial views put across parliamentary and executive decision making. Whether we possess the restraint and wisdom to manage this defies prediction.

There is no question that Indigenous recognition and consultation are imperatives for Australia. If the referendum is defeated, that will cause not insignificant harm in the country – and alternative responses will be essential. But defeat of the voice would be a genuine expression of Australian democracy, based on extensive, documented and legitimate concerns and it would represent a judgment by the people not to be beguiled by elites in their quest, conducted by deception, to change the country and alter fundamental principles of our Constitution and society.

Paul Kelly is Editor-at-Large on The Australian. He was previously Editor-in-Chief of the paper and he writes on Australian politics, public policy and international affairs.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/division-is-no-path-to-reconciliation-via-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/b48c599822686f80098a83d05722b57f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928680

File: 73af59527b5f034⋯.jpg (251.95 KB,1280x720,16:9,With_two_more_weeks_of_pub….jpg)

File: 3c12b836a5a1f57⋯.jpg (104.81 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Superintendent_Scott_Molle….jpg)

File: 27d9f7a64f225dd⋯.jpg (106.44 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_walks_out_o….jpg)

Brittany Higgins is the wrong face for #MeToo

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - MAY 27, 2023

1/2

Just before lunch on Wednesday, the lawyer acting for ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates reminded Detective Superintendent Scott Moller of something important he said earlier in the witness box.

“You take every opportunity to learn from a case, including this one?” Peggy Dwyer SC put to Moller.

Moller agreed. How could he not? It is hard to imagine any person involved in this scandal coming out the other end – if there is an end – without learning something about their own behaviour.

The board of inquiry into the ACT justice system’s handling of the Higgins-Lehrmann spectacle has the potential to provide some useful markers, but only if the inquiry asks every person in this saga what they have learned about their own behaviour. If they have learned nothing, or not enough, then it will fall to inquiry chairman Walter Sofronoff KC to tell us what he has learned about the behaviour of those he has heard from.

Last week, it was about the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions. This week was all about the cops. Next week, it will be Yates.

In Moller’s statement to the inquiry, he recalled that during his first meeting with Yates and Higgins, he asked Higgins to stop speaking with the media.

Moller said words to the effect that “if you’re going speak to the media, and this (the prosecution) can’t go ahead, it’ll all be for nothing”.

Moller says Yates responded on Higgins’s behalf: “She can’t, Scott – she is the face of the movement now.”

Yates’s lawyer this week claimed that Yates said something different, “something like, ‘excuse me, Scott, I’m just going to intervene here … I’d just like to note that the criminal justice system is just one thing that we are dealing with. And Ms Higgins has already undertaken a great deal of advocacy at a national level to bring attention to the difficulties of sexual assault survivors making disclosures and seeking support and calling for improvements across a range of areas.’ ”

In other words, not much different. Yates’s version was a long-hand way of saying that Higgins was the face of the #MeToo movement in Australia.

With the board of inquiry into its third week of public hearings, it is becoming increasingly clear that Higgins is, and was, the wrong face for the #MeToo movement. Decisions by her, and those around her, to air her allegation in the media have undermined key features of our criminal justice system.

Putting it another way, if Higgins is the right face for the #MeToo movement then heaven help the proper administration of justice in this country.

Higgins, of course, has every right to go to the media first and police second. That was her strategy from the start. But that strategy, bolstered daily by her media supporters, came at a high cost to the police investigation, to the workings of the Office of the DPP, to the trial in the ACT Supreme Court and to subsequent events.

We can try to tally up the financial costs of this saga another day. Here we are talking about the costs to the administration of justice when Higgins became the face of the #MeToo movement.

Start with the police investigation. If Higgins is portrayed as a role model for other women, then her tactic of going to the media first may be mimicked by other women. If so, the same problems that police confronted in this investigation may be repeated more frequently.

We need to understand the reasons police were concerned with Higgins’s media strategy. First, police were concerned that, by speaking to the media, a complainant might risk raising inconsistencies that could undo a successful prosecution.

The more times Higgins gave her version of events to the media, the more likely there might be new inconsistencies in what she said happened. That’s not a criticism of Higgins, more a reflection on human nature, that we don’t always repeat something in precisely the same way. That happened here. During her interview with Network Ten’s The Project, Higgins made several claims that later were shown to be wrong. That necessarily had the ability to undermine her credibility.

The “media first, police second” strategy posed another risk to our justice system. Bruce Lehrmann has always maintained his innocence, yet the media attention on Higgins and her unsubstantiated allegation necessarily undermined Lehrmann’s right to the presumption of innocence.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928681

File: 1f0256fc3decbe8⋯.jpg (151.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_prosecutor_Shane_Drumg….jpg)

File: 8ee62a5a37466a4⋯.jpg (85.23 KB,1024x768,4:3,Higgins_pictured_arrives_a….jpg)

>>18928680

2/2

Those who showed scant regard for this principle in this case may change their tune when it hits close to home, when they, or someone they know, is accused of rape and faces a media onslaught akin to what Lehrmann faced.

The police made mistakes in this case. For example, Moller conceded this week that police should never have handed Higgins’s counselling notes to the DPP and Lehrmann’s first defence lawyer, John Korn. Was this error, compounded when the DPP read the notes, the result of pressures arising from the febrile atmosphere surrounding a woman touted as the face of the #MeToo movement? The normal tension between advocating a victim-centric approach and ensuring the proper administration of justice was ramped up to dangerous when Higgins became the face of the #MeToo movement.

On more than a few occasions, the normal rules, and sound judgments, appear to have been discarded for Higgins. Moller told the inquiry that during an earlier case not involving Higgins, prosecutor Skye Jerome told police officers that prosecutions would not be progressed when alleged victims didn’t hand over their mobile phones.

When police investigators told Jerome, during a briefing about the Higgins case, that Higgins had not handed her phone over, “Jerome dropped her head into her hands in what appeared to be frustration and alarm”. This wasn’t the only time there appeared to be one set of rules for Higgins and a different set for other complainants.

Moller recounted that police allowed Higgins to view CCTV footage of her and Lehrmann at Parliament House on the night of the alleged rape, after she kept insisting she wanted to see it.

Showing her that footage went against their better judgment. The normal rule is not to show this sort of footage to a complainant as they may rely on it to change their story if they remember things differently, or if they can’t remember things at all.

Last week, DPP Shane Drumgold also admitted to several errors of judgment. The impact of these mistakes is serious. It’s not just that the DPP sought to keep from Lehrmann’s defence lawyers information that might have helped them in formulating their defence. Misjudgments by the DPP have the potential to undermine our trust in the administration of system.

Moller also gave evidence this week that he thought the DPP decided to proceed with a prosecution before reading the full brief of evidence. The DPP was determined to prosecute Lehrmann no matter what, Moller said, despite concerns among senior AFP officers that there was not enough evidence.

If Yates is right that Higgins became the face of the #MeToo movement, did that impair the DPP’s judgment?

So many people in positions of power who were caught up in the hype of the Higgins media storm appeared to have made poor decisions. Those who caused the original trial to be delayed should be asking themselves how that fits with seeking a victim-centric outcome.

Similarly, Yates – who will be in the witness box next week – should be asked whether her judgment was adversely affected by Higgins’s position as the face of the #MeToo movement.

Yates, who was described by her lawyer at the inquiry this week as a highly professional, compassionate and caring support person for victims of sexual assault, should be asked whether she gave Higgins advice about the inherent dangers of her chosen media strategy.

Did Yates gently suggest to Higgins that being the face of the #MeToo movement might bring much adulation, and many magazine covers, but media attention might undermine a prosecution?

Looking at her own conduct, did Yates consider the possible consequences for the presumption of innocence, and the potential impact on the jury, of her decision to accompany into court the woman who had become the face of the #MeToo movement, with the attendant press coverage that brought every day?

As Lehrmann’s lawyer, Steven Whybrow SC, told The Weekend Australian last week, that conduct carried a less-than-subtle and a less-than-subconscious inference that Higgins was in fact a victim.

“It was about as subtle as if Yates had walked in wearing a T-shirt saying ‘Bruce is guilty’,” Whybrow said.

With two more weeks of public hearings to go, mistakes by police appear to be small compared with misjudgments by other people who chose to become personally involved with Higgins. We will have to wait until July to hear whether Sofronoff agrees that Higgins’s notoriety as the face of the #MeToo movement came with significant costs for justice.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/brittany-higgins-is-the-wrong-face-for-metoo-writes-janet-albrechtsen/news-story/832d12be82c01a7d031cb4f4ee55b4fb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928685

File: b8ea32c873ec17c⋯.jpg (263.53 KB,1533x1027,1533:1027,Neville_Creen_at_christeni….jpg)

File: 5196f15f1094aab⋯.jpg (951.72 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Megan_her_sister_and_young….jpg)

Survivor of former Townsville paedophile priest Neville Creen reveals toll the abuse took on her life

Baz Ruddick - 27 May 2023

1/3

As a child Megan was full of promise. She did well at high school. She was liked and people used to tell her she should be a comedian.

She was vivacious, quick-witted and was a devoted teen athlete.

This story contains content that readers may find distressing.

But when the 59-year-old was five, a predator entered her life and his actions would eventually stamp out all that made her who she was — her sense of humour, her confidence and her pride.

Former Catholic priest Neville Creen was jailed in the early 2000s for abusing 22 other children.

Yesterday he was sentenced to 12 months' prison, to be suspended after serving three months, for his abuse of Megan.

He pleaded guilty to four charges, including indecent assault and treatment, and maintaining an unlawful relationship with a child.

Megan says when she was growing up Creen ingratiated himself into her family and didn't leave her life for more than 30 years.

His crimes have left behind terrible scars that affected her relationships and defined much of her adult life.

Attacked in bed

Megan's first memory of Creen was in the late 1960s.

She remembers him climbing the stairs of her family home, wine in hand, in the Townsville suburb of Palleranda.

The house was not off limits to the priest, whose guise was that he "loved the view" from the verandah looking across the water out toward Magnetic Island.

"That's all Creen used to go on about to convince my parents. 'Oh what a beautiful house, what a beautiful view'. That's the reason he got away with coming up the stairs with the alcohol," she said.

Later he convinced her mum that he needed to bath and feed her as this was his only chance to know what it would feel like to have a family.

With no extended family around they could rely on after moving from Toowoomba, he became the family's babysitter, minding the kids on a Friday night to give their mother a break after her battle with rheumatic fever.

It was in their childhood beds that Creen attacked Megan and her little sister.

"I have a clear memory of his black hairy arm coming over me while I lay there," she said.

"I can remember him standing over me and see one arm touching me whilst I lay in the bed. I can still remember the sound of him rattling the brown paper bag to drink the wine."

To this day, the crinkling sound of the bottle in a bag takes her back to the horror she experienced, and the smell of alcohol on someone's breath brings her to panic.

The horror is not hers alone.

From the late 1960s, Creen abused children at homes, in swimming pools, in school yards, on church grounds and on school camps across the Townsville Catholic Dioceses.

Much of his abuse was carried out at Mount Isa and Townsville, but statements seen by the ABC suggest he abused in Charters Towers as well.

Creen was removed from service in 1994 and moved to Sydney. Records from the Townsville Diocese show he resigned as a priest in July 1994.

The church claims it had no knowledge of his abuse until that year.

The ABC has seen statements from survivors of Creen's abuse that claim at least 30 members of clergy and education staff either had knowledge or were told of his abuse in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928686

File: b0882f09ac7eed8⋯.jpg (40.48 KB,554x859,554:859,Neville_Creen_often_looked….jpg)

File: bdd1d49ba52eb1d⋯.jpg (295.04 KB,1312x1750,656:875,Megan_left_and_her_family_….jpg)

>>18928685

2/3

Creen 'conned the family'

Megan said as Creen's abuse continued, it took a toll on her emotional and mental health.

She began to wet the bed and was often hysterical when trying to sleep.

His presence in her house had intensified and he began taking her for swimming lessons, another guise to abuse her.

He would take her down to the netted swimming area and molest her as he taught her to float on her back.

"Father Creen would take me to the swimming area every Saturday for approximately two months. He would then take me home and have lunch with my mother," she said.

"He would say 'close your eyes and float against my arm. Relax and trust me you're safe'."

He often forced her to sit on his lap, digging his hands into her ribs, telling her not to squirm and threatening to get her in trouble with her parents.

"He used to face the chair toward the kitchen. My mum would walk into the kitchen to make tea and that's when he'd be molesting us," she said.

"I'd try and jump off his lap and he'd go 'oh, I gotta control this one. She fidgets'."

She said he'd often "flick her parents away" asking for cups of tea so he could get time alone with Megan and her sister.

For a few years in later primary school, the family took a break from the church and the children went to a public school.

Megan said her mother had a falling out with the church over the use of the contraceptive pill and her and her sister left St Joseph's Primary School.

It was one of the few happy periods she remembers, but it wasn't long before Creen was back in their lives.

She thinks her place in the family as the mischievous sibling was what attracted him to her.

Megan played practical jokes and got a kick out of making adults laugh.

The house next door had a large coconut tree that would often drop fruit. She once rearranged their sign which read "Beware of coconuts" to read "Nuts live here".

She also remembers embarrassing her dad in the supermarket by jokingly asking him "can we please not have dog food again for dinner tonight?", loudly enough so that other shoppers could hear.

"If you were born with a bit of character and had a bit of spunk about you, that was his turn on," she said.

She thinks Creen effectively "conned the family" into thinking he was helping keep her in line and to ingratiate himself in the household.

"He used his position of power to control my family," she said.

'I knew I was stuffed'

Creen's abuse continued into high school.

The priest was a regular at school camps around the dioceses and while at one at Paluma, north of Townsville, he abused her during a "meditation session" he was running.

With the lights dimmed and everyone instructed to keep their eyes closed, he sat behind her, slid his hands up her top and onto her breasts.

She asked him if he should be touching her like that, to which he responded that it was a normal way for people to relax.

He asked her the next day if she had "enjoyed the massage".

It was after this that he began a "smear campaign", trying to convince her parents she was promiscuous and had been flirting with him.

She decided to tell her mother, but by the time she had returned home from the camp, Creen had beat her home.

"My mother did not believe me and told me the reason Father Creen had come out was to warn her that I had been flirting with him at camp," she said.

"After his visit that night, my mother told me to stop flirting with him."

She said she knew as soon as she saw him at her home that she would not be believed.

"I knew I was screwed the way he was looking at me. The smug look on his face," she said.

"He took a chair out of the table and sat it on the left side of him and patted the top of the chair, 'come and sit here'."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928688

File: 8e44ef10644285b⋯.jpg (202.21 KB,1536x2048,3:4,Neville_Creen_is_no_longer….jpg)

File: 209fdca709eedab⋯.jpg (851.99 KB,3331x2049,3331:2049,Neville_Joseph_Creen_in_20….jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>18928686

3/3

He tried to further discredit her to people in the church, and to her parents.

He told her she couldn't wear jeans to church because they were "too sexy" and told her she needed to wear a bra.

When she returned to Townsville after going to a university ball as the date of a friend, he made sure he was there to pick her up from the airport.

He began telling her that having sex outside marriage was sinful, and rubbing her leg.

"I hadn't even kissed the boy," she said.

When she refused to go to church for confession with him, he told her parents she had sinned and that she would go to hell.

Despite serving as a priest in Mount Isa, Creen returned to visit the family and the abuse would continue.

In sentencing on Friday, Judge Craig Chowdury told the Beenleigh District Court Creen's offending showed a "shocking break of trust".

"A Catholic priest in those days, and even still to this day, is in a position of esteem and authority and some power in the Catholic community," Judge Chowdury said.

"You took advantage of that."

He also said Creen manipulated Megan's mother with a "pre-emptive strike".

"You told the mother that the complainant had been behaving inappropriately and flirting with you, which was a disgraceful and disgusting thing to have said."

'He acted like a rock star'

When Megan left home to live in Sydney, he maintained a stranglehold on her life through the close relationship with her mother.

"My mother thought he was Elvis Presley. He acted like a rock star. He had an irritating giggle. He was like my mother's best friend," she said.

He performed the ceremony at Megan's wedding and christened her children.

"Not only did he do the ceremony, but he also gate crashed my wedding [reception]. I hated that guy and he offered to give a speech," she said.

In 1987 Creen, who was then a chaplain with the army in Sydney, insisted he would baptise her daughter.

He insisted he "re-baptise" her other children who were christened by another priest.

Megan said the last time she had any direct contact with Creen was in 2000.

A lifetime of scars

Megan said her abuse by Creen and his hold on her mother affected her in many ways.

As a teenager she became withdrawn and did not reach her academic potential.

Even now noises wake her up in the middle of the night and cause her to become hysterical with night terrors.

She said she has become resistant to many forms of therapy and experiences intense anxiety.

"I spend a lot of time at home alone. My husband does our shopping for us, so I do not have to leave the house," she said.

"I do not care for myself. My daughter tells me to brush my hair and put make up on. I hate looking at myself in the mirror."

She said she has trouble trusting men and she dislikes people who are "over the top" friendly.

"He just used to prime us and have us ready, waiting," she said.

"He was supposed to be God's shepherd, but instead he was a wolf in shepherd's clothes, waiting to prey on our innocence and devour us," Megan said.

"We had no power to fight him, that's how I feel. I felt I was trapped."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-27/neville-creen-paedophile-priest-townsville-sentence-queensland/102382894

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928691

File: fedfe7e274ea7ca⋯.mp4 (15.91 MB,640x360,16:9,ARGOS_arrest_Redbank_Plain….mp4)

Taskforce Argos arrest 71yo Redbank Plains man at fast food restaurant for child sex offences

Shayla Bulloch - May 27, 2023

An elderly man who brought condoms and chocolates as gifts for a “young girl” he believed to be meeting for sex has been arrested by undercover detectives.

The 71-year-old Redbank Plains man was taken into custody on Thursday afternoon at a Brisbane fast-food outlet where he thought he was meeting a school-aged girl.

Instead, he was met by detectives from Argos who had been posing as the child online.

Police will allege the man used an online chat forum to communicate with the “child”, sent naked photographs of himself and started engaging in behaviour police will allege constitutes grooming.

It will be alleged he was communicating with the “child” for a number of days.

It is alleged the man then asked the “child” to meet him for sex at the location, where he also brought chocolates and condoms as gifts which were seized at the scene.

Detectives then searched the man’s home where they allegedly found child exploitation material on his devices.

He’s been charged with two counts of grooming a child under 16, and one count each of use internet to procure child under 16 and intentionally meet, and possessing child exploitation material.

He faced Brisbane Magistrates Court on Friday and was released on bail with conditions.

He will reappear at court on June 5.

Argos Detective Inspector Glen Donaldson said undercover officers were working around the clock online to detect those who try to harm children.

“Every day, day and night – to those predators, expect the next ‘child’ you message, to be a member of Argos,” Detective Inspector Donaldson said.

“This arrest is a reminder to parents of the dangers of online predators, and how crucial caregivers and trusted loved ones are in teaching children about online safety.

“Young people need to believe that nothing is too embarrassing or serious that they can’t come to you for support, advice or to report behaviour that makes them uncomfortable.

“Supervision and communication are crucial to prevention – have the conversation with your children about how to stay safe online and the dangers of engaging with online ‘friends’ who they have never met face-to-face.

“Even if an app tells you a social media picture ‘disappears’, everything you do online leaves a footprint and could be seen by people and predators across the world.”

https://www.couriermail.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-qld/taskforce-argos-arrest-71yo-redbank-plains-man-at-fast-food-restaurant-for-child-sex-offences/news-story/5fc76db5c342b7181e887e43139e5479

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928693

File: 1991b2f6df561d8⋯.jpg (75.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,Officers_from_the_Argos_Co….jpg)

File: 8bda78028c39580⋯.jpg (99.93 KB,1280x720,16:9,Officers_from_the_ARGOS_Co….jpg)

>>18928691

Queensland Argos detectives give insight into harrowing task of catching sex offenders online

Under cover of darkness, a group of covert police officers lay in wait for a Queensland man who was trying to auction off his infant child to the highest bidder. Meet the officers responsible for bringing down some of the worst sex offenders in the country.

Shayla Bulloch - May 27, 2023

1/2

Under cover of darkness, a group of covert police officers lay in wait for a Brisbane man who was trying to auction off his two-year-old child for exploitation to the highest bidder.

They got the tip-off 12 hours earlier from a law enforcement agency overseas, and within three hours the Queensland Police Argos team knew who he was and where he lived.

Before the sun rose, the man was arrested and a child rescued from the grips of his abuse, leading to him serving 22 years in jail.

It’s one of the jobs that stands out most in the mind of Argos Covert Online team leader Michelle – not her real name – during her four-year tenure with the world-leading child protection agency.

Michelle is one of a select few officers in a close-knit team whose job it is to catch sex offenders online, and has given an insight into what it’s like to hunt some of the worst criminals in the country.

Officers pose as either an adult offender or an innocent child to extract information from online predators and lure them to arrest.

They trawl through encrypted chat rooms and social media platforms for leads, as well as chat directly with paedophiles, all clueless they are speaking with a police officer.

They adopt different “profiles” best suited to different perpetrators, and usually have a handful of suspects on their “task list” at any given time.

Some suspects offend within hours, while others draw out communication for months.

But, more than anything, it’s a harrowing task.

Officers are exposed to countless images of child abuse, forced to communicate with rapists and paedophiles, and have to stay in character in spite of it all if there’s any chance of saving a child.

“It is very difficult,” another covert officer, Jacob – not his real name -, said.

He’s been in the team for about 18 months, and said the horrific photos of child abuse were sometimes not even the most confronting part of the job.

“If you see a horrific image of a child or something happening, it’s the praise and communication of all these paedophiles talking about it that’s probably harder than the image itself.”

“Acting like someone saying these horrific things about children can be quite hard, but you’ve always got the knowledge that you’re doing it to potentially save a child or get an offender off the street.”

It’s this immense dedication to child protection that has resulted in 417 children saved, 29 sex offenders arrested and 279 others referred to interstate or international agencies just in the last financial year.

The team, set up in 1996, are responsible for undoing some of the biggest paedophile networks in the world, including the arrest of South Australian child protection worker Shannon McCoole, who was the administrator of a paedophile chat board with 45,000 members. He was sentenced to 35 years jail for abusing children in his care and running the global site.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928695

File: 6eac7b5af277ac2⋯.jpg (61.39 KB,650x1001,50:77,Accused_child_sex_offender….jpg)

File: fb1af3f016d1dcc⋯.jpg (134.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,Officers_from_the_Argos_Co….jpg)

>>18928693

2/2

In 2019, the arrest of the Brisbane man trying to auction off his child was also a “big one”, says Michelle.

“That came through late in the afternoon, so the team worked together to identify where the child was, located the address of the offender, we were ready to go, however they weren’t home.”

They stayed there for hours, waiting for him to appear, but eventually Michelle decided to let her troops go home and rest.

But she couldn’t stop thinking about the little boy.

“Not often do I not sleep with a job, but all I was doing (that night) was thinking ‘please don’t touch him’.”

They reassembled before 5am and went through the door, finding the offender back online trying to get international offenders to fly into Queensland to abuse his infant.

“As soon as we walked in the door … you just see everything from those images.”

The child was rescued and the man charged with 35 offences.

Earlier this year, the team also helped in the arrest of a man who they will allege was about to abduct a child interstate.

They found him online, alerted interstate authorities, and he was promptly arrested allegedly in possession of a rape kit.

In another incident this year, Argos covert officers found a Queensland man – who worked with children – online who they claim had filmed the abuse of a child and shared it.

They swooped in, started talking to him, and figured out he was also a carer who had embedded himself in the community in order to get easy access to kids.

Within 24 hours of engaging with the man, he was arrested and charged.

“It’s all the time though, this is basically every day,” Jacob said.

A crucial part of their operation is Hamish – not his real name – a victim identification specialist who sorts through millions of child abuse images to save the children at the centre of these insidious crimes.

Hamish finds clues in every image, whether it’s items in the room, where it came from or where it was posted, to complete the puzzle of finding the victims and removing them from harm.

“It’s actually quite rewarding,” Hamish said.

“I am constantly trying to be a champion for the children. There’s so many victims, so many offenders, so few investigators … I still have to be the champion for that as the likelihood anyone else is going to be is really low.”

What stands out is the speed in which these officers are closing in on these offenders.

“It’s so important to all of us, we are all working hard on that until it’s done,” Michelle said.

“Whether I’m getting overtime or not, I’m going to stay and do my part to save this child.”

But social media companies and platforms are dismantling their progress, and the rise of AI is becoming a new threat.

Hamish said predators will be able to generate fake child abuse images using just a juvenile’s face.

“It doesn’t matter how hard we run ourselves into the ground … if industry sites don’t pull their weight, we’re just going to drown under the amount of victims,” Hamish said.

“They really do have an obligation to make their platform safe and some really need to lift their game, that’s pretty clear.

“You’re going to see the abuse spiral out of control (with AI).”

But parents and guardians have the most significant part to play in keeping children safe.

“It’s scary. Parents need to have an active role in monitoring their social engagement,” Michelle said.

“You don’t just give your kids a Ferrari and go ‘here you go’, but we seem to do that with cell phones,’ said Hamish.

“This device is putting an offender, anywhere in the world, in your kids bedroom.”

https://www.couriermail.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-qld/queensland-argos-detectives-give-insight-into-harrowing-task-of-catching-sex-offenders-online/news-story/f263a8c0bc7b525e90097091124a1477

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928705

File: 7db80fdc23c46ff⋯.jpg (72.6 KB,976x579,976:579,Inside_the_Little_Black_Ch….jpg)

File: f2c39b1d103c8c2⋯.jpg (62.26 KB,976x599,976:599,Minister_Rose_d_Arc_perfor….jpg)

File: a4b36b5a8a5ae23⋯.jpg (85.52 KB,976x549,16:9,SatanCon_s_opening_ceremon….jpg)

File: 8ab04af4b000016⋯.jpg (148.66 KB,976x1049,976:1049,Members_of_the_Satanic_Tem….jpg)

File: a238a24afc3026b⋯.jpg (178.45 KB,976x669,976:669,Protestors_hold_up_signs_o….jpg)

>>18804767 (pb)

>>18804793 (pb)

The Satanic Temple: Think you know about Satanists? Maybe you don't

Rebecca Seales - 19 May 2023

1/3

This may be the world's largest ever gathering of Satanists - and it's about to begin at a Marriott hotel in downtown Boston.

In a candle-lit room set aside for Satanic ceremonies, a neon sign welcomes you to The Little Black Chapel. A raised altar stands at one end, a white pentagram on the floor in front of it.

The ritual being performed here is an "unbaptism", in which participants symbolically reject religious rites performed when they were children.

"No names," says a Satanist who agreed to let me witness their ceremony, as long as they aren't identified.

They wear a floor-length, hooded cloak and a black face mask. Their hands are bound with rope, which is then cast off to represent liberation. Pages are torn out of a Bible to symbolise overturning their Christian baptism.

It's clear the experience was powerful for them.

"As a gay child, being told you are an abomination and should be destroyed, warped a lot of my thinking. Finding The Satanic Temple has really helped me embrace logic and empathy."

The Satanic Temple is recognised as a religion by the US government, and has ministers and congregations in America, Europe and Australia.

More than 830 people snapped up tickets for its late April convention, dubbed SatanCon.

Members say they don't actually believe in a literal Lucifer or Hell. Instead, they say Satan is a metaphor for questioning authority, and grounding your beliefs in science. The sense of community around these shared values makes it a religion, they say.

They do use the symbols of Satan for rituals - for example when celebrating a wedding or adopting a new name. That might include having an upside-down neon cross on your altar while shouting: "Hail Satan!"

For many Christians, this is serious blasphemy.

"That's not wrong," agrees Dex Desjardins, a spokesperson for The Satanic Temple. "A lot of our imagery is inherently blasphemous.

"We've got folks who wear inverted crosses. And our opening ceremony did have the ripping up of a Bible as a symbol of oppression, especially oppression of LGBTQ folk and women, and also the BIPOC community, and pretty much anybody who's grown up with religious trauma, which is a tremendous number of our members."

The Satanists say they respect everyone's right to choose their faith, and they're not trying to upset people.

But Christian protesters from many denominations have gathered outside the hotel, carrying signs warning of damnation.

"Repent and believe the Gospel," urges one. "Satan rules over all the children of pride," says another - the letters of "pride" shaded in the rainbow colours of the LGBTQ Pride flag.

"We are hoping to show God that we do not accept this blasphemy, and that we Catholics have not abandoned the public square to Satanists," says protester Michael Shivler, from a conservative Catholic group.

Convention-goers in the lobby eye the protest outside. "They called us 'dope-smoking masturbators'," one man reports. "Oooh, sky daddy is mad with me!" someone else jokes.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928707

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18928705

2/3

Hellbillies, horns, and Satanic self-pleasure

The event takes up the whole fourth floor of the hotel. The Satanists fill it with androgynous goth chic, flamboyant robes, hand-painted horns, diabolical tattoos, and high-maintenance moustache choices.

Most people here are old enough to be parents, and several are. I spot at least one pushchair.

Presentations are given, including one called "Hellbillies: Visible Satanism in Rural America", and a seminar on Satanism and self-pleasure.

Political activism is a core part of The Satanic Temple's identity. It believes religion and the state should be kept separate, and frequently files lawsuits in the US to defend the distinction. Their point is serious, but they relish bringing satire and outrageousness to the fight.

In Oklahoma, for example, they asked to erect an 8ft (2.4m) Satanic statue at the state capitol when a monument of the Ten Commandments was put up, noting that the First Amendment requires all religions to be treated equally. (The Commandments were ultimately removed after a court battle.)

The Temple also advocates for abortion access, arguing that everyone should have autonomy over their own body.

Earlier this year, it opened an online clinic based in New Mexico, which provides abortion pills by mail.

It has also developed an abortion ritual for people terminating a pregnancy - which is designed to be comforting and involves reciting an affirmation before the abortion - and argues its members must be religiously exempt from abortion bans that would stop them performing it.

That rationale has drawn criticism from some quarters, including in Catholic newspaper the National Catholic Register which called the ritual "nothing more than a grotesque parodying of religious rituals and symbols".

The Yellowhammer Fund, which finances low-income people seeking abortions, declared that "putting your dollars and trust in grassroots organisations that have been doing this work for decades" was a better way to support abortion access.

In a hall packed with supporters, the directors of TST's campaigns present updates on their work. Successes are greeted with whoops, applause, and the sign of the horns.

Another project drawing headlines is After School Satan Clubs - slogan: "Educatin' with Satan". The Temple would rather keep religion out of schools, but wants to counter faith groups coming in to evangelise to pupils.

So where local people have asked it to, it tries to launch an After School Satan Club, focused on community service, science, crafts and critical thinking.

Opponents say it's frightening children, but TST says its content is demon-free. They have a kids' song - My Pal Satan - with a bopping animated goat, and the lines: "Satan's not an evil guy, he wants you to learn and question why. He wants you to have fun and be yourself - and by the way there is no hell."

'Satan loves you!'

Dozens of artists and vendors have set up stalls to sell Satanically inspired crafts. They have everything from "Satan Loves You!" beanies, to crocheted toys modelled on the Baphomet - a goat-headed Satanist symbol with wings.

The Satanic Temple is selling its own T-shirts too. The group doesn't take membership fees, and is kept running largely off donations and merch sales.

A newly launched children's book, titled Goodnight Baphomet, draws coos from bystanders.

The Satanic Temple's code of guiding principles - the Seven Tenets - prioritises empathy, control over one's own body, and respect for other people's freedoms, including the freedom to offend.

Translate that into a kids' book, and it includes rhymes like: "Respect everyone's right to be, especially when they disagree. If their words make you mad, set them free - don't be sad!"

Araceli Rojas, who flew from California to be here, finds the tenets relatable and easy to apply.

"I feel like I've always been quote-unquote a Satanist, I just didn't know it."

She says she first learned about TST through TikTok in 2020. "At that point I looked into it. A little scared, I think, like most would be. And I really wanted to make sure that they weren't sacrificing babies! Then I started getting into the culture, and the scene, and I started to join meetings… and eventually I realised no, they're not, it's just a symbol that they use and it's genuinely really good people."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928710

File: f13e971cf796e7f⋯.jpg (199.33 KB,976x1149,976:1149,Some_attendees_wore_their_….jpg)

File: 53e09bd8d0a1fcb⋯.jpg (434.35 KB,976x1349,976:1349,One_seller_who_goes_by_Lit….jpg)

File: 436d6cc66767ec9⋯.jpg (224.86 KB,976x999,976:999,The_children_s_book_Goodni….jpg)

File: 815d54cc97dce88⋯.jpg (254.67 KB,976x799,976:799,Lucien_Greaves_co_founder_….jpg)

File: b72e02577db86c4⋯.jpg (202.07 KB,976x859,976:859,The_Satanic_Temple_defends….jpg)

>>18928707

3/3

Chatting around the merch stalls, many people say their intro to The Satanic Temple came from the 2019 documentary Hail Satan?, directed by Penny Lane, which explores the Temple's principles and early activism.

TST says it boosted membership from perhaps 10,000 in 2019, to more than 700,000 today.

Those gathered in Boston include local government staff, medics, engineers, artists, people in finance, a social worker, a therapist, and a circus performer. Many belong to the LGBTQ community. Plenty are married to Christians - or at least to non-Satanists.

Members tend to lean to the left politically, but there's no political test to join and the Temple will not endorse any party or candidate.

Lucien Greaves, The Satanic Temple's co-founder, arrives with personal security, dressed in black and carrying a Thermos. "English breakfast tea. I got it from a shop that sells British stuff." He smiles when I accidentally say "bless you!"

Greaves (a pseudonym) started the movement a decade ago with a friend, Malcolm Jarry (also a pseudonym). They shared a commitment to religious freedom, and opposing what they see as Christianity encroaching on legislation.

News outlets, especially in the US, often present The Satanic Temple as attention-seeking pranksters pretending to be a religion, something he strongly objects to.

"People are hesitant to take anything we say at face value, but I feel like everything we say is pretty straightforward and we're not misrepresenting ourselves at all."

If you're trying not to look like trolls, was it wise to name your abortion clinic "Samuel Alito's Mom's Satanic Abortion Clinic", after the Supreme Court judge who backed the decision to remove the federal right to abortion? And then put it on a T-shirt?

"Part of the consideration was refusing to yield to this idea that everything must be sober and humourless to be authentic at all," says Greaves.

"My thinking on that was - nothing could be more serious than us opening a telehealth clinic. I just would hate to see us lose any sense of humour." Greaves has had to adjust his life to deal with the personal risks he faces as America's most prominent Satanist.

"I moved at some point within the past four years and I don't even have people over, because I don't want to have to move again."

Some TST members feel unable to acknowledge openly that they're involved, citing risks to their safety. Members who have been outed have lost their jobs, lost their children in custody battles, and found fake bombs under their cars.

Chalice Blythe, spokesperson for the Temple's religious reproductive rights campaign, received online harassment in the middle of SatanCon, after footage went viral of her tearing a Bible during the opening ceremony.

It's not the first time she's been threatened. In 2016, a family member leaked her details online and a gunman turned up at her home.

The gunman "said 'this is what I'm here to do - I have this gun with that bitch's name on it.' I know they went to jail.

"Legally changing my name, I've had to do that."

As far as she's concerned, it's worth it. "If my enemies are people of a crazy evangelical mindset who want to take my rights away - those are the kind of enemies I'm proud to have."

Typhon Nyx, in his 30s, is one of many TST members who uses an alternative name in the community - a "Satanym", as they call it. He says he moved from atheism to Satanism only recently.

"Satanism stands for everything I believe in," he says. "Including bodily autonomy, compassion, respect, science. And Satan represents those who were cast out, those who think differently.

"I never found my friends being accepted in the Christian circles. The appeal of Satan is that he is the accepting one, the inclusive one, and someone I can more identify with.

"Although, I don't believe he actually exists."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65549975

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rekZMxlYVcM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928713

File: 6d0789a86bb8aef⋯.jpg (744.58 KB,852x1489,852:1489,Q_4627.jpg)

File: 854248dc16ec5ff⋯.jpg (76.96 KB,960x960,1:1,EgCocuoXsAANrRi.jpg)

File: dc7b6550cd470ba⋯.jpg (718.33 KB,852x892,213:223,Q_4429.jpg)

File: 7e90d7f936b0ab6⋯.jpg (254.59 KB,852x674,426:337,Q_4396.jpg)

File: 0be73ce8c1e97b4⋯.jpg (119.42 KB,1920x1080,16:9,200601_1591066627421.jpg)

>>18928705

Q Post #4627

Aug 26 2020 12:23:33 (EST)

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1297521970813317121

One party discusses God.

One party discusses Darkness.

One party promotes God.

One party eliminates God.

Symbolism will be their downfall.

The Great Deceiver(s).

When was the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader being Patriotic [exhibiting National Pride (love of Country)]?

When was the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader 'speak out against' the riots [violence in the streets]?

When was the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader support those who took an oath to protect and defend?

When was the last time you witnessed a [D] party leader support and call for UNITY across our Nation?

ALL ASSETS DEPLOYED.

INFORMATION WARFARE.

INFILTRATION.

DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA.

Have Faith in Humanity.

Have Faith in Yourself.

UNITED WE STAND.

GOD WINS.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4627

Q Post #4429

Jun 6 2020 13:32:28 (EST)

https://s3.amazonaws.com/lifesite/Open_Letter_President_Donald_Trump.pdf

The Armor of God

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. 17 Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people.

Have faith in Humanity.

Have faith in Yourself.

Have faith in God.

The Great Awakening.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4429

https://web.archive.org/web/20211102220931/https://s3.amazonaws.com/lifesite/Open_Letter_President_Donald_Trump.pdf

Q Post #4396

Jun 3 2020 01:44:26 (EST)

God wins.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4396

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928883

File: 67537efa56840b3⋯.jpg (189.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_with_Yoln….jpg)

File: 9fe744bf7356c6f⋯.jpg (166.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Gough_Whitlam_pours_soil_i….jpg)

>>18928670

An Indigenous voice to parliament is our chance to grasp history and create change, says Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

ANTHONY ALBANESE - MAY 28, 2023

1/2

The 1967 referendum was powerfully symbolic, a moment of national idealism. In that year, 90 per cent of Australians voted to remove a harmful, discriminatory relic. In 2023, our generation can go one better.

Instead of removing a provision that no longer speaks for who we are, we can make a positive change that speaks for the future we seek to build. This can be a moment of Australian unity. An extraordinary opportunity for every Australian to be counted and heard – to own this change and be proud of it, and truly live the spirit of the fair go.

After the tumult of colonisation, we have lived through a silence, a long tide of denial gnawing away at the shores of our spirit. And an entire people have been kept so long in the margins, surviving against the odds, surviving even against misguided good intentions.

We have to come to grips with the past because a country that does not acknowledge the full truth of its history is burdened by its unspoken weight. But we learn. We acknowledge. And bit by bit, as we each admit each truth into our midst like a shaft of light, we are easing that burden. Moments of truth that include the Freedom Rides, the 1967 referendum, Mabo, Wik, the Redfern Speech, the Apology to the Stolen Generations and the red sand captured in a photo on that brightest of days, forever flowing from Gough Whitlam’s hand into Vincent Lingiari’s.

None stands as an answer in itself, but each step forward sees us narrowing the distance between reality and our perception of ourselves – and the people we aspire to be. We sometimes speak of ourselves as a young nation, but we are one of the world’s oldest democracies. Our continent is home to the world’s oldest continuing culture, which we are at last coming to recognise as the great source of pride that it must be.

Even from a geological perspective, Australia is home to the oldest continental crust on Earth, with parts of Western Australia’s Gascoyne region clocking in at 4.4 billion years old. So perhaps it’s only fitting that we are not a nation given to acting in haste.

Last Friday, it was the sixth anniversary of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which emerged from the First Nations National Constitutional Convention, whose delegates were all selected by their communities.

If you want to reach back a little further, it is nine decades since William Cooper – that great Yorta Yorta man and trade unionist – began drawing up the petition that constituted the first call for something akin to a voice to parliament.

To those who keep saying now isn’t the time, I ask: When is?

This hasn’t been rushed into. There have been no shortcuts. Nor is this something that began in Canberra. This has been a grassroots movement, the culmination of years of discussion, consultation and hard work by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. And what shines so brightly at the very core of its gracious request is the desire to bring us all closer together as a people reconciled – and to lift our great nation even higher.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928886

File: 3f827a9ad4a9241⋯.jpg (445.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

File: d270a6f2ea67037⋯.jpg (102.33 KB,1280x720,16:9,Voice_architects_Pat_Ander….jpg)

>>18928883

2/2

This will be about recognition of this continent’s first people in the nation’s birth certificate, providing a people what Marcia Langton and others have termed “a rightful place in the nation”.

The voice won’t be a funding body. It won’t run programs. It won’t have a power of veto. We know that from the Solicitor-General’s opinion, we know from former High Court judges. We know it from leading legal academics. And we know it from constitutional experts, including Megan Davis and George Williams.

It will be about consultation, an ongoing conversation. It will be about listening. A body that will be representative of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and chosen by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. A body made up of representatives from every state and every territory. Representatives from towns and remote communities and everywhere between.

When it’s been tried on a smaller scale, it’s clear that when decisions are made after listening to the people on the ground, the results are positive. Look at the Indigenous-led community health clinics extending life expectancy and improving the experience of people having to undergo dialysis or treatment for rheumatic heart disease.

Look at the Indigenous Ranger Programs that have tapped into a great well of wisdom, cutting feral animal numbers and boosting protection for our unique natural environment by employing local people to work on country. And look at justice reinvestment programs that are reducing incarceration rates. If you want to see that in action, look at Bourke, where the community-led Maranguka Project is delivering results.

If you want to break that down into dollar terms, the Maranguka Project saves the NSW economy five times what it costs to operate. The difference it makes to people’s lives, though, is beyond measure.

Amid the fog of fiction and misunderstanding these past few months, it’s important to spell it out again. This isn’t about politics. This isn’t about politicians. This is about people. People striving to make themselves heard across our great nation. In the regions and beyond in the remotest corners of our vast continent.

All those voices rising across Australia like the headwaters of a thousand creeks and rivers joining into a mighty and wonderful current that will converge around each one of us as we step into the booth on referendum day.

Amid it all, there’s another echo of the 1967 referendum – the voice to parliament is supported by nearly 90 per cent of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

We are fortunate to be here in this moment in history, where we have within our hands the chance to make a positive change that will last for generations.

A change that will outlast us.

This is an excerpt from Anthony Albanese’s Lowitja O’Donoghue Oration, which will be delivered in Adelaide on Monday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-is-our-chance-to-grasp-history-and-create-change-says-prime-minister-anthony-albanese/news-story/fd052daa30458eba4d3c795c8df105ed

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928925

File: fe1ebc2a3b71dad⋯.mp4 (15.98 MB,640x360,16:9,Mark_McGowan_one_of_the_mo….mp4)

Mark McGowan resigns as WA Premier

Alex Blair - May 29, 2023

Western Australia’s Premier Mark McGowan has announced he is stepping down as the state’s leader, admitting his many years serving has left him “exhausted”.

The Premier made the announcement at a press conference at 12.45pm (2.45pm AEST).

“Today I‘m announcing I will be stepping down as Premier and as member for Rockingham. I was elected as Premier of Western Australia in March 2017, more than six years ago,” he said.

“I served as Opposition Leader for five years, I have held the privileged position of WA Labor leader for around 11 and a half years.”

“I have served in Parliament for 26 years as either Premier, Opposition Leader, Minister Shadow Minister Parliamentary Secretary and of course, as the member for Rockingham.”

McGowan said he was “exhausted” by the “all-consuming” position, admitting the Covid years had “taken it out of him”.

“I just don‘t have the energy or drive that is required to continue in the role as Premier. Or to fight that election which would have been my eighth election as a Member of Parliament,” he continued.

“This job is like no other, after seven elections across nearly three decades, now is the right time to step away from the job that I have loved. Therefore, I will be resigning as Premier and member for Rockingham.

“This week will be my final week. It is not a decision I have taken lightly, I’ve been considering it for quite a while. But I needed to hand down a state budget before a made a final decision.”

McGowan said there wasn’t a particular “lightbulb moment” that prompted his decision, citing the ongoing pressure of the state’s top job eventually pushing him past his limit.

“It’s sort of built up over time. I worked out that I did not want to fight the next election 20 months away,” he said.

“I wanted to give my successor, whoever that is, the opportunity to cement themselves and create their own way and their own agenda and enough time to bid themselves in.”

McGowan refuted claims his announcement would hurt the Labor party in the next election, placing faith in the people behind him to secure re-election.

However, he warned his eventual successor to be wary of the “all consuming position”, hoping that “they’ll do a better job than me”.

“It is not a road normal role, being a minister is not a normal role, it is all consuming,” he said. “I can’t give advice on that, because I haven’t been very good at balancing things. I hope whoever my successor is, is better at it than me.”

The outgoing Premier said he doesn’t have any plans after he leaves office, only that he wishes to continue to work.

McGowan led Labor back to government with an overwhelming victory over the Liberal government in March 2017, and again at the 2021 election.

He enforced some of the toughest Covid-19 restrictions on travel during the pandemic.

He was also Treasurer of WA and handed down a budget earlier this month.

https://www.news.com.au/national/western-australia/mark-mcgowan-to-resign-as-west-australian-premier-report/news-story/5213188a118e3f846aee27707be5386c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928944

File: dbc07c7fb845496⋯.mp4 (15.55 MB,640x360,16:9,Mark_McGowan_has_announced….mp4)

>>18928925

Mark McGowan stands down as WA premier in shock announcement, citing exhaustion

Cason Ho and Jake Sturmer - Mon 29 May 2023

1/2

WA Premier Mark McGowan has announced he is retiring from politics in a bombshell announcement.

In a press conference held with just 45 minutes' notice, Mr McGowan said he would step down as premier and member for Rockingham at the end of the week.

"The truth is I'm tired, extremely tired. In fact, I'm exhausted," he said.

Under Mr McGowan’s leadership, WA Labor swept to power in 2017, winning with a huge swing against a Liberal Party led by long-time premier Colin Barnett.

The 55-year-old was re-elected for a second term in 2021 in an extraordinary landslide, winning 53 of the 59 seats in the state's lower house.

He also appointed himself as the state's treasurer following that election. Both that role, and his job as premier, will now need to be filled.

The next WA election is not due until March 2025.

"It has been an honour and privilege to serve the people of the state in my community over this time," Mr McGowan said.

"It is way beyond what I could ever have imagined my career would amount to."

Deputy Premier Roger Cook and Health Minister Amber-Jade Sanderson are considered likely frontrunners to succeed Mr McGowan as premier, with Mr Cook confirming he had put himself forward for the role.

Health Minister Amber-Jade Sanderson did not say whether she would run for the party leadership, but in a statement praised Mr McGowan as "an extraordinary, once-in-a-generation leader".

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Mr McGowan called him on Monday morning to notify him of his resignation.

"I want to pay tribute to Mark McGowan. My friend, my confidante, but also an extraordinarily successful premier of Western Australia," Mr Albanese said.

"Mark McGowan has, through social, environmental, and economic policy, built a stronger WA, and I wish him all the very best for the future."

'Relentless' pressure of the job

Surrounded by his cabinet at the press conference, Mr McGowan said the "relentless" pressures of political life had worn him down.

"I've loved the challenge of solving problems, making decisions, getting outcomes, and helping people," he said.

"It comes with huge responsibility that is all consuming each and every day. And, combined with the COVID years, it's taken it out of me.

"I'm not naturally confrontational. But every day I have to engage in argument and debate, and confrontation one way or another. And I'm kind of tired of it."

Mr McGowan said he still believed in the Labor party, and had confidence it would win the next state election.

'I'm convinced WA Labor can win, and will win … but I just don't have the energy or drive that's required to continue in the role as premier," he said.

A 'political juggernaut'

Mr McGowan said he would officially step down by the end of the week, but had no plans for the future.

"I'm going to have a break for a while. Once I'm rested and recuperated, I'll look for something to do," he said.

ABC elections analyst Antony Green said few could have predicted the dominant place the "mild" Mr McGowan would occupy in WA politics after his election defeat in 2013.

"I don't think anybody who met him when he had his first election as opposition leader would think a decade later he would be so dominant across Western Australia," Mr Green said.

"He turned out to be a juggernaut, politically."

WA Opposition and Nationals leader Shane Love said Mr McGowan's resignation would "come at a cost to the Labor party brand".

"There's no doubt that the McGowan name was very much the brand of this particular Labor government," he said.

Both Mr Love and WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam acknowledged the workload that came with Mr McGowan's decision to take on the treasurer role after winning the last election.

"We have always questioned why the premier had undertaken the role of treasurer as well, given the significant size of the caucus that WA Labour has enjoyed," Ms Mettam said.

She said his resignation made no difference to her party's plans at the next election.

"The Liberals have always seen the next state election as contestable," she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928947

File: b1fefe9821f7641⋯.jpg (238.39 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Mr_McGowan_held_a_snap_pre….jpg)

File: 0d6ce6e996ce202⋯.jpg (1.82 MB,4512x3008,3:2,Amber_Jade_Sanderson_left_….jpg)

File: 1a41be539417b91⋯.jpg (221.37 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Sarah_McGowan_centre_was_a….jpg)

File: 43fc2b888448b2c⋯.jpg (410.14 KB,2260x1507,2260:1507,Mark_McGowan_says_leading_….jpg)

File: a2d0662314ebac3⋯.jpg (136.25 KB,862x575,862:575,Mr_McGowan_and_then_health….jpg)

>>18928944

2/2

The 'rock star' premier

Mr McGowan enjoyed overwhelming popularity in his second term throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, enacting the nation's strictest border policies.

The approach came with its critics, with some arguing it was heavy-handed, and prompting then-deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce to describe WA as a "kind of hermit kingdom".

Criticism was even harsher when Mr McGowan postponed his initial border opening date.

However, he consistently argued his approach helped keep West Australians safe and bolstered WA's economy while the rest of the country struggled.

Mr McGowan was allegedly targeted with threats on several occasions by people who were opposed to his hard stance on border controls and mandatory vaccinations.

He also engaged in a legal stoush with mining magnate Clive Palmer that cost WA taxpayers $2 million, centred around a war of words over WA’s border controls and one of Mr Palmer's mining projects.

The premier said the stress of the political battleground throughout the pandemic played a significant role in his decision to resign.

"The COVID experience, basically three years … having to deal with all that, and all the pressure that was associated with that, that drained me a lot," he said.

WA has enjoyed huge budget surpluses throughout Mr McGowan's second term off the back of iron ore royalties and GST payments.

The state is set to record a $4.2 billion surplus this year – a figure that rivals the federal surplus but falls short of the even bigger purses of $5.7 billion and $5.6 billion recorded in the years before.

The Metronet legacy

Outside his role as a pandemic premier, Mr McGowan also took on the challenge of overhauling WA's transport infrastructure with his flagship Metronet election promise in 2017.

The project has been bogged down by delays and thrown off its initial rollout schedule, with the McGowan government pointing at COVID-19 and the state's heated construction market as unavoidable causes.

The most recent major progression was the opening of a rail link from the airport to Perth CBD in October 2022, with other major milestones due in coming years.

"I'd like to open some of the new rail lines, I'd like to see the passing of some of our legislative reform … equal opportunities laws, and the gun laws, and the planning laws, and a whole range of other social reforms that will make the state stronger and better," he said.

"I'll be able to see it. I just won't be at the press conference. That's all."

In recent years, the McGowan Government has faced strong criticism over its management of WA's only juvenile detention centre, Banksia Hill, with ongoing legal action claiming mistreatment in detention.

Mr McGowan has been steadfast in taking a tough-love approach to resolving issues in youth crime, but has been rebuked by some medical professionals, judges, and advocates.

No regrets

On a whole, the Premier said he believed he had achieved what he set out to do when he first entered politics.

"When I was elected as premier I had ambitions for our state. I wanted Western Australia to become the strongest, most successful state in the nation," he said.

"To be become more economically diversified, and have the strongest public finances. To be socially reformist, with landmark achievements in conservation and environmental protection as well. To provide our citizens with quality public services and long term infrastructure, for our long term future.

"I'm not leaving with any regrets."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-29/wa-premier-mark-mcgowan-resigns-from-politics/102406610

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928950

File: f80886ff338aba8⋯.jpg (84.53 KB,1280x720,16:9,WA_Premier_Mark_McGowan_in….jpg)

File: 655afe95afd4546⋯.jpg (119.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Western_Australia_Premier_….jpg)

File: eb2d87882a50650⋯.jpg (157.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Western_Australia_Premier_….jpg)

>>18928925

WA Premier Mark McGowan’s shock departure puts Labor seats at risk

GEOFF CHAMBERS - MAY 29, 2023

Mark McGowan’s shock departure from politics inflicts a ­massive blow to the Labor Party’s prospects at the 2025 state and federal elections.

Western Australia’s most popular leader in its history – whose landslide 2021 state election victory left the Liberal and National parties in ruin – played a huge hand in delivering Anthony Albanese majority government.

Albanese had to wait for the red wave in Perth – where results rolled in two hours behind those on the east coast – to deliver Labor the Liberal seats of Swan, Hasluck, Tangney and Pearce, before claiming majority government on election night.

McGowan’s “X-factor” significantly boosted federal Labor’s stocks in Western Australia, and ALP strategists are concerned that losing his popular appeal in the west will make it tougher to ­retain seats.

But peel away the veneer of popularity and McGowan’s legacy is mixed.

He benefited from bumper mining royalties, a close relationship with the billionaire owner of The West Australian newspaper, Kerry Stokes, popular local support for draconian Covid-19 restrictions, and a weak Coalition.

However, the 55-year-old leaves behind questionable records on crime, health, infrastructure, China and social ­housing.

McGowan’s loyalties to Beijing undermined national efforts for unified resistance against ­Chinese coercion, foreign interference and cyber attacks.

Labor’s dominance in a state where the Coalition had carved-out a stronghold at recent federal elections is unlikely to stick.

West Australian voters, who were fiercely loyal to McGowan, have traditionally differentiated between state and federal politics.

While the historic trend was reversed in 2022, few believe that Labor will maintain its lead of nine seats to five over the Liberals.

McGowan’s importance to federal Labor was on show at last year’s ALP campaign launch held in Perth, where he took centre stage and introduced Albanese as the “next prime minister of Australia”.

Adding to the loss of McGowan, WA ALP director and federal campaign mastermind Tim Picton quit shortly after the May election to take up a job with Mineral Resources.

The saving grace for Labor at both federal and state levels is that their political opponents remain in disarray.

As WA Premier, McGowan was unashamedly parochial and cast a long shadow over the state, serving in the top job for six years and as opposition leader for five.

To the delight of Sandgropers, McGowan took on Queensland billionaire Clive Palmer, waged war with eastern states over tough pandemic restrictions, and secured a GST windfall for WA.

Ironically, it was Scott Morrison’s formation of national cabinet in March 2020 that made McGowan a powerful and prominent figure on the national stage.

McGowan’s exit from politics leaves Daniel Andrews and Annastacia Palaszczuk as the only survivors of Morrison’s founding national cabinet.

McGowan, a career politician who used the national cabinet to wage his WA-centric ideology, adopted the most extreme Covid-19 restrictions, shut WA off from the rest of the country and repeatedly disrupted national efforts to adopt an Australia-wide pandemic recovery plan.

The radical approach was lauded in WA, where locals avoided lockdowns throughout the bulk of the pandemic, continued working and enjoyed their freedom.

Albanese, who picked up an additional Senate seat on the back of the McGowan-inspired red wave, will need to channel the WA Premier’s centrist and populist approach to stem bleeding of votes.

The Prime Minister risks facing a harsh reception in WA if he goes too far on industrial relations reforms, prosecutes his social agenda too aggressively and pushes too hard on taxing the resources sector.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/wa-premier-mark-mcgowans-shock-departure-puts-labor-seats-at-risk/news-story/0876d0723706e3b2875b64e9b21f64b0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18928954

File: 812a37c10b2cf83⋯.jpg (157.65 KB,1023x768,341:256,Premier_Mark_McGowan_celeb….jpg)

File: 1ddd293af38f260⋯.jpg (167.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,McGowan_in_Beijing_in_2018.jpg)

>>18928925

Exit door: ‘Premier’s legacy a weakened federation’

Mark McGowan was the first state leader to take a strong alternative approach in foreign policy, setting a precedent for a lack of cohesion, particularly on China, experts say.

SARAH ISON - May 29, 2023

Mark McGowan was the first premier to take as strong an alternative approach to a federal government in foreign policy and “revelled” in stepping out from the commonwealth particularly on the relationship with China, foreign policy experts say.

The outgoing Western Australian leader frequently called out the former Coalition government and its handling of the relationship with Beijing, which he labelled “insane”, and demanded Scott Morrison end the damaging rhetoric against Australia’s biggest trading partner.

During a visit to China last month – the first in four years – Mr McGowan said it was “unfounded” to have a “fearful relationship” with Beijing after 50 years of fostering a close economic relationship.

Australian National University emeritus professor of strategic studies, Hugh White, said Mr McGowan and had been offering up “an alternative take” for some time on the relationship with China compared to Canberra.

“This is completely new in my experience. I don't think we’ve seen a state government taking such a high profile and such a well-developed alternative view on such a significant foreign policy question before,” he said.

“McGowan has been striking in the consistency and clarity with which he has articulated a different view on this key foreign policy question from federal politicians are both sides of politics.”

ANU international security and intelligence studies professor, John Blaxland, said Mr McGowan had changed the face of the federation forever, but not necessarily for the better.

“What he demonstrated was a very fragility of the Federation. Ever since the Second World War, we’ve had this sense that the federal government is pre-eminent and omnipotent, but McGowan proved that wrong and he kind of revelled in it,” he told The Australian.

“His actions have set a precedent for a lack of cohesion in the federation. Would-be adversaries now have a much better understanding of the fracture lines of the federation.”

Strategic Analysis Australia director, Michael Shoebridge, said the Premier had “discounted the need for a coherent national approach to China” and prioritised the economic interest of WA instead.

“I think he just he saw his role as premier as about purely about jobs and growth and saw that he had no responsibilities for national security or strategy,” he said.

“He contributed to Beijing‘s program of trying to divide Australian jurisdictions on China.”

Co-lead for the Defence Strategic Review, Peter Dean, said while Mr McGowan was “entitled to his views”, the need for cohesion across all jurisdictions had never been so important considering the strategic circumstances facing the country.

“One of the things about the federation is the interests between Commonwealth and states don’t always align … but the DSR talks about the need for integrated statecraft, which is a whole of government and whole of nation approach,” he said.

“Given the risks we face in the contemporary Indo-Pacific strategic environment, it would be highly beneficial if international state craft was enacted at all levels of government and we can get agreement of what is in overall national interest rather than what is in the interest of specific states or regions.”

Perth USAsia chief executive Gordon Flake said while there was “no question” that there was tension between Mr McGowan and the former federal government, the premier’s approach to foreign policy was “not as different as you think”.

He argued Mr McGowan’s legacy would instead be wrapped up in the state’s Covid policies – pointing to the decision to close the border to the rest of the country.

“What WA did was protect our international engagement,” he said. “In order to keep the economic engine of Australia running, to keep the iron ore mines running, to keep the LNG projects running, and thus to keep the exports going and keep the national economy running, Western Australia could not pursue Covid policies like you saw in New South Wales.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/wa-premier-mark-mcgowan-revelled-in-stepping-out-from-commonwealth/news-story/195576331b0d35f14212f20d8ec6bcc8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18929002

File: 0016163de862026⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,3600x2400,3:2,Daniel_Duggan_is_a_former_….jpg)

File: 9094e1701258560⋯.jpg (639.44 KB,1600x1200,4:3,Saffrine_Duggan_worries_he….jpg)

Australian citizen Daniel Duggan is accused of training Chinese military pilots by the US. His wife alleges he's caught in a 'political power play'

Angelique Donnellan and Xanthe Kleinig - Mon 29 May 2023

1/3

October 21 last year started like any other for Saffrine Duggan. Her husband Daniel dropped off their kids at school and went to the supermarket. He then planned to meet his wife for coffee but never showed up.

"Probably 15 minutes after that is when Dan called me and he told me that he was at the police station," she told 7.30.

"He said, 'I've been arrested.' I was in shock. He was in shock. It didn't feel real."

Daniel Duggan was born in the United States and served as a pilot in the Marines between 1989 and 2002. He's been an Australian citizen since 2012.

He's now in custody in Lithgow Correctional Centre in NSW pending extradition to the US on charges of conspiracy, arms trafficking and money laundering.

"He 100 per cent denies all accusations," Ms Duggan told 7.30.

"He is in a cage-like set-up. He does not have any access to the outside at all … there are no windows, his cell is approximately two by four metres long.

"He's a good man — and he's in isolation."

Key to the US government's pursuit of Mr Duggan is his time as a contractor with the Test Flying Academy of South Africa between 2010 and 2012.

Mr Duggan says he provided training to civilian aviators.

But in its indictment, the US government alleges the flying school had a contract with a state-owned entity in China to deliver training to military pilots.

The indictment alleges Mr Duggan provided services including "the evaluation of military pilot trainees, testing of naval aviation related equipment and instruction on the tactics, techniques and procedures associated with launching aircraft from and landing aircraft on a naval aircraft carrier".

Mr Duggan is alleged to have made a number of trips to China and conspired to conceal $182,570 in "prohibited transactions and services from detection by the United States Government as to avoid penalties".

The indictment alleges unnamed co-conspirators, not Mr Duggan, bought a former US Navy training aircraft, a T2-Buckeye, to "enhance the training" being provided.

'He's the soft target'

In her first sit-down interview, Saffrine Duggan has told 7.30 her husband denied ever training members of the Chinese military or divulging any military secrets.

"He was 100 per cent told that he was training civilian pilots. Everything was open sourced. He was working with some very credentialed other pilots. He had no reason to think that he wasn't doing anything but what he was told," she said.

"There's been many, many tears. He's still very confused as to how this could happen.

"I can't believe that it's been able to come this far.

“The reality is he's with all of these trumped-up charges, he's facing 65 years imprisonment."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18929010

File: 4c7f124b7834a05⋯.jpg (120.12 KB,800x600,4:3,The_relationship_between_t….jpg)

File: 9d0e976d1485c44⋯.jpg (1.89 MB,5000x3538,2500:1769,Glenn_Kolomeitz_is_a_forme….jpg)

>>18929002

2/3

The US State Department declined 7.30's request for an interview but the indictment alleges Mr Duggan knew he needed the government's written permission to train a foreign air force.

Australian army veteran and Duggan family advocate Glenn Kolomeitz claimed permission was not needed because of the nature of the work.

"Nothing about this job said that Dan was working for the military of another country. It was contracting to a civilian company," Mr Kolomeitz said.

Mr Kolomeitz said Mr Duggan trained Chinese civilian pilots in South Africa but not in their homeland.

"Let's look at the context at this time. China was booming. They were developing airports. They were drawing a lot of Western expertise to develop their aviation industry," he told 7.30.

He says the former marine visited China on his own behalf during the period in question to deliver a motivational speech to small businesses called "The Fighter Pilot's Guide to Mission Success" which did not contain any classified information and had been presented a number of times in Australia.

In a statement, the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) said Mr Duggan undertook one contract over a decade ago. It said none of its training involved classified methods nor any frontline activities or defence services and Mr Duggan has "never worked on a TFASA overseas training mandate".

Mr Kolomeitz said the indictment referred to co-conspirators from South Africa, the United Kingdom and China but none of them had been charged in relation to this matter.

"Dan was a US citizen at the time of the conduct as alleged at the time he was working. He's the soft target here," Mr Kolomeitz said.

Fractious relationship between US and China

In the background of this story is a changing geopolitical landscape. Saffrine Duggan claims her husband is being pursued because of increasing hostility between the United States and China.

"Dan has been caught up in something that is political and he shouldn't be. He's a person, an individual that they're trying to use in a political power play," she told 7.30.

Defence Analyst Ben Herscovitch from Australian National University said the relationship between the United States and China was very different around the time Mr Duggan was alleged to have committed the offences.

"New President Xi Jinping travelled to the United States in 2013, and had sunny, warm positive photo ops with President Obama," he told 7.30.

"In those early years of President Xi Jinping's tenure there was optimism about his potential role as a reformer in China."

He said tensions between the two countries ratcheted up after Donald Trump's election in 2016.

"US policy on China shifted in a really fundamental way," Mr Herscovitch said.

"China plans to operate something on the order of five aircraft carriers by roughly the 2030s and then potentially up to six or seven out to 2040-2050.

"It makes sense that the United States would be deeply troubled by this kind of story in light of the fact that … they could be going to war over the course of the next few years, or the next few decades."

The US indictment against Mr Duggan was filed in 2017. Mr Kolomeitz has questioned the timing of the indictment.

"This reeks of politics," he claims.

"It's interesting that Dan was working over there in that 2010-2012 period; suddenly, in 2017 the US change their emphasis on China, they start referring to China as the strategic threat [competitor] and all of a sudden, there's this indictment."

It was only after Mr Duggan's arrest that the indictment was made public and he learned of the charges against him.

Mr Kolomeitz points out former British air force pilots known by the UK government to have trained Chinese pilots have not been charged with any crime.

"The UK position is quite appropriate. They've identified that there were no breaches of their national security laws, there were no offences applicable," he told 7.30.

Mr Duggan's legal team is trying to halt his extradition through Australia's courts.

Mr Kolomeitz claimed the former marine should not be sent back to the US because of what's known as the double criminality requirement.

"The conduct as alleged must constitute an offence, a crime in both countries. So in the requesting country, the US, and in the requested country, Australia.

"These offences, based on the alleged conduct … did not, to my view, constitute a crime in Australia," he told 7.30.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18929014

File: 16e0aac1eabfc3d⋯.jpg (1.76 MB,4085x2740,817:548,Daniel_and_Saffrine_Duggan….jpg)

File: f20b6fde6c53dbf⋯.jpg (423.08 KB,1280x960,4:3,Daniel_Duggan_with_his_chi….jpg)

>>18929010

3/3

'An uncertain future'

Mr Duggan first came to live in Australia in the early 2000s.

Saffrine met Mr Duggan in 2011 and he became an Australian citizen in 2012 to commit to Australia, his wife, and his kids.

Ms Duggan and the children returned to Australia, after living in China, at the start of the pandemic. Her husband returned last September. He was arrested weeks later.

Mr Kolomeitz said a complaint had been raised with the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) as to whether ASIO acted appropriately in the lead-up to Mr Duggan's return to Australia and arrest.

"Dan had a job offer in Australia flying for a contractor to defence, that job required a security clearance and required an Aviation Security Identification Card (ASIC). To get an ASIC you need a security clearance. ASIO told him that his security clearance was successful," he said.

"The extradition most certainly should not go ahead whilst this Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security inquiry is on foot."

A spokesman for ASIO said the organisation "operates within the letter and the spirit of the law, acting in a targeted, proportionate and ethical way" but couldn't comment further.

Ms Duggan and her children recently travelled to the US Embassy in Canberra to call for the case against her husband to be dropped. She fears he won't get a fair trial in the United States and could die in jail if he's found guilty.

"I'd like to offer a plea to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Mark Dreyfus, our Attorney-General, to let him go," she told 7.30.

The Commonwealth Attorney-General's Department said it couldn't comment on Mr Duggan's case to avoid compromising "ongoing investigations or matters in a foreign country".

Mr Duggan will remain in a NSW prison until at least late July, when the court next considers the case to stay his extradition.

Mr Kolomeitz said under the extradition act, Mr Duggan isn't eligible for bail unless there are special circumstances.

"Dan poses no flight risk. The government could very readily take away his passport. He has six kids, he has a wife, Australian, he has strong community ties. All the tests for a normal bail application, under normal circumstances independently of this extradition act are met," he said.

"We've taken a proud military man with a history of proud service, put him in a green tracksuit with … an uncertain future."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-29/daniel-duggan-extradition-arrest-china-united-states-730/102378956

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18929024

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18929002

Wife of former US Marine accused of training Chinese military pilots by the US speaks out | 7.30

ABC News In-depth

May 29, 2023

Last October Australian authorities, acting on a request from the United States, arrested former Marine pilot Daniel Duggan for allegedly training pilots from the Chinese military. Duggan is being held in a maximum-security prison while he fights extradition to America. This report by Angelique Donnellan and Xanthe Kleinig.

Read more here:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-29/daniel-duggan-extradition-arrest-china-united-states-730/102378956

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-TN1qGKHSc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18929116

File: 5bc0d71db14cb2a⋯.jpg (50.34 KB,634x634,1:1,Conspiracy_theorists_onlin….jpg)

File: 4e5c289d4dad8ff⋯.jpg (117.79 KB,634x951,2:3,Kylie_recently_landed_a_co….jpg)

File: 2e22bb8f1946036⋯.jpg (227.44 KB,805x960,161:192,Religious_conspiracy_theor….jpg)

File: 75859c342edc97b⋯.jpg (31.35 KB,634x357,634:357,Meanwhile_Kylie_is_current….jpg)

File: 7d5ec96a591327f⋯.jpg (65.77 KB,634x357,634:357,In_Padam_Padam_s_bizarre_m….jpg)

Better the Devil You Know! Conspiracy theorists make shock claims that Kylie Minogue is part of a Satanic cult: 'The Illuminati has a new toy puppet'

J. PETERSON - 31 May 2023

Kylie Minogue is embroiled in a bizarre and baseless Satanic conspiracy theory.

The Australian pop star, who is currently in the midst of a major career comeback thanks to her new single Padam Padam, has been accused of pushing satanic messaging in her music videos and album artwork.

God-fearing conspiracy theorists have pointed out that the cover of the 55-year-old's upcoming album Tension features an Illuminati pose.

The Illuminati are a group that conspiracy theorists assert controls the world's affairs and economy, and its members come from the worlds of politics, business and entertainment.

In the Tension cover image, Kylie holds one hand over her eye, which conspiracy theorists believe is a reference to the 'evil eye'.

'I don't know who told you to pose like this but it is a symbol of Satanism,' one fan tweeted.

'The hand gesture represents 666 and covering one eye is a well known satanic gesture. I certainly do not believe you knew,' they added.

'Truly SATANIC, Kylie,' remarked another, while one wrote: 'So the illuminati has a new toy puppet, and she’s a pop princess!'

Another fan said that they could no longer continue making excuses for the Better The Devil You Know hitmaker.

'I loved #KylieMinogue. I made excuses for her. But her latest album is in-your-face Illuminati symbolism from one-eye cover to dancing in devil red on the debris of Western Civilization in the Padam Padam video,' they wrote.

'Looking back, it was there from the start, on "I Should Be So Lucky",' they finished.

Kylie is far from the first A-list celebrity to be accused of being part of the Illuminati.

In 2018, Elizabeth Hurley, Boy George, Robert Downey, and former US President George W. Bush were all accused of being part of the Satanic underground club when they were all pictured sporting black eyes.

According to some conspiracy theorists, the black left eye is part of an Illuminati high-level initiation ritual during which the pledger is said to be forced to 'eat pain' in a quest to become more powerful.

Author and internet radio show host Sherry Shriner - who wrote the book Interview With The Devil, in which she claimed to converse with Lucifer - has spoken of the link between these black eyes and 'soul scalping'.

According to Shriner, government leaders, people on TV with their own shows and hundreds of popular entertainers have sold their souls to Satan.

'You cannot be on TV now, without signing on the dotted line. The bizarre recurrence of facial bruises on Illuminati politicians and entertainers has resulted in speculation that their souls have been replaced in a satanic ritual called "soul scalping",' she said.

Meanwhile, Kylie is currently in the middle of a huge comeback with her new single Padam Padam.

The addictive dance track has gone viral on social media and become her highest-charting hit in over a decade in both Australia and the UK.

Kylie addressed her chart comeback on social media this week, thanking fans for their support.

'It has been an incredible week topped off by being my birthday today and I can’t thank you enough. My heart is bursting with joy so thank you so so much,' she gushed.

'What an incredible, another wild turn in my life and my career. Thank you so much for all of your love and support, everyone who has got onto Padam Padam and made this possible for me. I love you, thank you so so much.'

In Padam Padam's bizarre music video, Kylie sizzles in a series of red bodysuits and a billowing cape as she dances hypnotically in a junk yard.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12142385/Conspiracy-theorists-claim-Kylie-Minogue-Satanic-cult.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6Cnazi_Fi0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18929148

File: b5d347bec2bfc73⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,852x1405,852:1405,Q_3906.jpg)

>>18929116

>a bizarre and baseless Satanic conspiracy theory.

Q Post #3906

Mar 28 2020 14:18:02 (EST)

>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).

>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).

>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).

>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).

>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).

>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).

Those who attack you.

Those who mock you.

Those who cull you.

Those who control you.

Those who label you.

Do they represent you?

Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?

Mental Enslavement.

The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.

The choice is yours, and yours alone.

Trust and put faith in yourself.

You are not alone and you are not in the minority.

Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.

WWG1WGA!!!

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3906

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934029

File: 4dc0cb470bb921e⋯.jpg (65.25 KB,976x549,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_sued_thr….jpg)

>>18900749 (pb)

Ben Roberts-Smith: Top Australian soldier loses war crimes defamation case

Tiffanie Turnbull - 1 June 2023

1/2

Australia's most-decorated living soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has lost a historic defamation case against three newspapers that accused him of war crimes in Afghanistan.

The outlets were sued over articles alleging he killed unarmed prisoners.

The civil trial was the first time a court has assessed accusations of war crimes by Australian forces.

A judge said four of the six murder allegations - all denied by the soldier - were substantially true.

These included:

• A handcuffed farmer the soldier had kicked off a cliff - a fall which knocked out the man's teeth, before he was subsequently shot dead

• A captured Taliban fighter who was shot at least 10 times in the back, before his prosthetic leg was taken as a trophy and later used by troops as a drinking vessel

• Two murders which were ordered or agreed to by Mr Roberts-Smith to initiate or "blood" rookie soldiers.

Justice Anthony Besanko found the newspaper had not proven two other murder allegations; nor reports Mr Roberts-Smith had assaulted a woman with whom he was having an affair; nor a threat against a junior colleague.

But additional allegations that he had unlawfully assaulted captives and bullied peers were found to be true.

Mr Roberts-Smith, who left the defence force in 2013, has not been charged over any of the claims in a criminal court, where there is a higher burden of proof. The 44-year-old was not present for Thursday's judgement.

After the decision, a Taliban spokesman said the case was proof of "uncountable crimes" by foreign forces in Afghanistan, but added he did not trust any court globally to follow them up.

Australian troops were deployed to Afghanistan between 2001 and 2021. Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles declined to comment on the case, saying it was a civil matter.

Mr Roberts-Smith is Australia's most famous living war veteran and served with the elite Special Air Service (SAS).

He received the country's highest military award - the Victoria Cross - in 2011 for having single-handedly overpowered Taliban machine-gunners who had been attacking his platoon.

But his public image was shattered in 2018 when The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times started publishing articles about his misconduct between 2009 and 2012.

The soldier argued five of the killings reported by the newspapers had occurred legally during combat, and the sixth did not happen at all.

His defamation case - dubbed by some "the trial of the century" - lasted 110 days and was rumoured to have cost up to A$25m ($16.3m, £13.2m).

More than 40 witnesses - including Afghan villagers, a government minister and a string of current and former SAS soldiers - gave extraordinary evidence about every facet of Mr Roberts-Smith's life.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934032

File: 228fc6a45f57247⋯.jpg (94.48 KB,976x549,16:9,Journalist_Nick_McKenzie_s….jpg)

>>18934029

2/2

But the case also exposed some of the secretive inner workings of Australia's elite special forces.

The trial heard from soldiers who said potential misconduct was rarely reported due to a "code of silence" within the regiment, and others defended their actions as necessary.

Many giving evidence were there unwillingly, having been subpoenaed, and three refused to speak about some allegations fearing self-incrimination.

Much of the evidence against Mr Roberts-Smith relied on eyewitness accounts and recollections of discussions among soldiers. Justice Besanko had to weigh the reliability of witnesses against each other, with the media outlets contending theirs had no reason to lie.

Speaking outside the Federal Court in Sydney, the news outlets called the judgement a "vindication" for their reporting.

"It's a day of justice for the brave men of the SAS who stood up and told the truth about who Ben Roberts-Smith is: a war criminal, a bully and a liar," said investigative reporter Nick McKenzie, who wrote the stories alongside Chris Masters and David Wroe.

"[And] today is a day of some small justice for the Afghan victims of Ben Roberts-Smith."

The Afghanistan Human Rights and Democracy Organisation also praised the role of investigative journalism in "uncovering the truth and raising public awareness" about what had taken place in the country.

Media magnate Kerry Stokes - who employs Mr Roberts-Smith at rival outlet Seven West Media - said the judgement did "not accord with the man I know".

"I know this will be particularly hard for Ben, who has always maintained his innocence," said Mr Stokes, who loaned the soldier money to fund his legal case. Mr Roberts-Smith had offered to hand in his Victoria Cross as collateral, local media reported.

The case comes three years after a landmark report found credible evidence that Australian forces had unlawfully killed 39 civilians and prisoners in Afghanistan from 2007 to 2013.

Accusations of war crimes have also been levelled at soldiers from the UK and US in recent years.

Local media say dozens of Australian soldiers are being investigated for their roles in alleged war crimes. But so far charges have only been laid against one, Oliver Schulz.

War historian Peter Stanley told the BBC ahead of the judgement that Mr Roberts-Smith's case was "a litmus test" for allegations of Australian wrongdoing in Afghanistan.

"The Ben Roberts-Smith episode is just a precursor to the major series of war crimes investigations, allegations, prosecutions, and possibly convictions that we'll see over the next few years."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-65773942

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934054

File: a5cec8c508efbef⋯.mp4 (15.84 MB,640x360,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_defamati….mp4)

>>18934029

Ben Roberts-Smith loses mammoth defamation battle against newspapers, reporters

Jamie McKinnell - 1 June 2023

1/2

A defamation case by war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith against three newspapers has been dismissed, after a judge found defences of substantial or contextual truth had been established over alleged unlawful killings, bullying and domestic violence.

The Victoria Cross recipient sued The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Canberra Times and three journalists in the Federal Court over a series of stories published in 2018.

Mr Roberts-Smith said they contained false allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, bullying of his former Special Air Service Regiment (SAS) colleagues and domestic violence against a woman in a Canberra hotel room.

Publisher Nine Entertainment relied on a truth defence, and both sides called current and former SAS witnesses.

Justice Anthony Besanko today ruled the publisher had established the substantial truth of the imputations linked to allegations of unlawful killings in Afghanistan, and had established the contextual truth of imputations linked to allegations of bullying and domestic violence.

He ordered the proceedings be dismissed.

The most serious allegations contained in Nine's particulars of truth related to the deaths of six Afghan men who were under control or confinement.

Justice Besanko found Nine had established a substantial truth in relation to the most prominent alleged unlawful killings in its reporting.

However, the judge found they had not established this defence in relation to two alleged deaths, which took place on separate missions in 2012.

Outside court, Mr Roberts-Smith's barrister Arthur Moses SC said: "We will consider the lengthy judgement that his honour has delivered and look at issues relating to an appeal."

Journalist Chris Masters, who was named as a respondent in Mr Roberts-Smith's lawsuit, said the decision to publish the articles would go down as one of the "great calls" in the news industry.

"I'm not standing here as a loser but I don't think that anybody comes out of a matter like this feeling exultant and triumphant," he said outside court.

Investigative journalist Nick McKenzie, who was also a respondent in the case, said he never wanted to go to court, and pointed out Mr Roberts-Smith did not turn up to the judgement.

"He's in Bali doing whatever he's doing, but we're here … to welcome justice and the truth," McKenzie said outside court.

Allegation of kicking man off cliff

The most dramatic allegation published by Nine involved a mission in the village of Darwan, in September 2012.

It was there Mr Roberts-Smith was accused of kicking an unarmed, handcuffed Afghan farmer named Ali Jan over a cliff.

The decorated veteran gave evidence that a suspected Taliban "spotter" was killed in a cornfield during the mission, and denied there was any cliff or kick.

But a former SAS soldier called by Nine and codenamed Person 4, claimed in court he was left shocked after seeing Mr Roberts-Smith "catapult" a man backwards over a slope, before a number of his teeth were knocked out when he hit a rock.

Person 4 further testified the injured man was then dragged towards a large tree, before Mr Roberts-Smith had a quick conversation with another soldier, Person 11.

The witness said he then heard shots ring out and saw Person 11 in a position to shoot.

In relation to the mission in Darwan, Justice Besanko found Mr Roberts-Smith's conduct and actions, as established in court, meant Nine had established the substantial truth of three imputations.

These included that Mr Roberts-Smith "murdered an unarmed and defenceless Afghan civilian, by kicking him off a cliff and procuring the soldiers under his command to shoot him," and "broke the moral and legal rules of military engagement and is therefore a criminal".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934062

File: 34df496825bcc9c⋯.jpg (719.23 KB,2500x1668,625:417,Nick_McKenzie_right_called….jpg)

File: 7159e6b77020e9c⋯.jpg (842.64 KB,2500x1668,625:417,A_large_press_pack_gathere….jpg)

File: f37933fd718bca0⋯.jpg (321.76 KB,1920x1080,16:9,This_photo_of_Ben_Roberts_….jpg)

File: cb0957e0d4f62cc⋯.jpg (673.43 KB,2500x1668,625:417,Arthur_Moses_SC_front_righ….jpg)

File: d1e9c1e02314e4c⋯.jpg (722.39 KB,2500x1668,625:417,Chris_Masters_was_one_of_t….jpg)

>>18934054

2/2

Whiskey 108 mission

Another mission which dominated evidence took place in April 2009, when the SAS bombed and raided a Taliban compound known as Whiskey 108.

There were contradictions between accounts provided by Mr Roberts-Smith's SAS witnesses and those called by Nine, in relation to a secret tunnel discovered there — and whether or not any Afghan men surrendered from it.

Nine alleged one of the men, who had a prosthetic leg, was shot dead by Mr Roberts-Smith outside the compound, while a second was shot by a junior soldier.

A witness, codenamed Person 4, gave evidence it was Mr Roberts-Smith who ordered the man be shot.

Several of the ex-soldier's witnesses insisted, like him, there were no men in the tunnel, and during his own evidence the veteran told the judge a man he killed was a legitimately engaged, armed insurgent he encountered outside.

A soldier, codenamed Person 41, was among the witnesses who contradicted that evidence; he claimed to have seen Mr Roberts-Smith "frogmarch" an Afghan man outside and fire three to five rounds from a machine gun into his back.

In relation to the Whiskey 108 mission, Justice Besanko found Nine successfully established the substantial truth of six imputations, including that Mr Roberts-Smith "committed murder by machine gunning a man with a prosthetic leg" while a member of the SAS.

Domestic violence allegations

An allegation of domestic violence in a Canberra Hotel related to a woman Mr Roberts-Smith had an affair with from October 2017.

Known as Person 17, she recalled attending a function at Parliament House in March the following year, where she fell down stairs while trying to leave the event, having been drinking, and sustained an injury to the side of her forehead.

She told the court Mr Roberts-Smith later punched her to the side of the face, angry her behaviour that evening revealed their relationship.

Mr Roberts-Smith denied striking the woman — describing domestic violence as "a disgusting act of cowardice" — and told the court he left the passed-out woman on the bed with ice for her injury.

He said a newspaper report about the alleged assault "ruined his life".

Justice Besanko today said he was not satisfied the woman's evidence was "sufficiently reliable to form the basis of a finding that the assault occurred".

This meant that two imputations, including that Mr Roberts-Smith "committed an act of domestic violence" and was "a hypocrite" due to his public support for domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty, had not been established as substantially true.

However, the judge found Nine successfully established a defence of contextual truth.

The publisher argued that because imputations linked to the more serious allegations were substantially true, Mr Roberts-Smith's reputation could not have been further harmed by these imputations related to the alleged assault.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-01/ben-roberts-smith-defamation-result/102420546

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934081

File: 1bc8469bbdc6b24⋯.jpg (53.33 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_lost_his….jpg)

File: 52b7efe022d6c71⋯.jpg (209.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Medals_including_Victoria_….jpg)

>>18934029

Ben Roberts-Smith: SAS veteran a murderer with a cross to bear

STEPHEN RICE - JUNE 1, 2023

1/2

Australia’s most decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, callously murdered four unarmed ­civilians while serving with the Special Air Service in Afghanistan, a judge has found, and now faces the prospect of serious criminal charges and being stripped of his Victoria Cross.

Handing down his decision in the high-stakes defamation action brought by the former soldier against Nine newspapers, Federal Court judge Anthony Besanko ruled on Thursday that Mr ­Roberts-Smith had murdered four prisoners, including a ­farmer who was kicked off a cliff in the village of Darwan, and a one-legged man dragged from a tunnel at the compound known as ­Whiskey 108.

Nine Entertainment is expected to pursue Seven West chairman Kerry Stokes personally for costs in the failed defamation case, with legal fees estimated at more than $25m and potentially up to $40m.

On Thursday Nine’s lawyers indicated they would apply for a special order as to costs in relation to Mr Roberts-Smith “and any third party”, ­believed to be a reference to the media mogul, who bankrolled the ex-soldier’s case.

Although a civil case, Justice Besanko found that Mr Roberts-Smith broke the moral and legal rules of military engagement and was therefore a criminal.

Legal observers believe the judgment significantly increases the likelihood that Mr Roberts-Smith will face criminal charges, with investigators from the ­Australian Federal Police and the Office of Special Investigations currently assessing evidence.

Whatever further action follows, the landmark defamation judgment extinguishes Mr Roberts-Smith’s treasured reputation as a war hero.

Nine had its biggest win over the centrepiece allegation that Mr Roberts-Smith kicked an ­unarmed Afghan detainee named Ali Jan off a cliff and then killed him. The report claimed Mr Roberts-Smith kicked the handcuffed farmer off a cliff in Darwan in September 2012, and then – with another SAS soldier known as Person 11 – dragged him aside and shot him dead.

An Australian soldier known as Person 4, serving as second in command to Mr Roberts-Smith, told the court the VC recipient took a few steps forward and ­kicked the man in the chest, ­sending him sailing over the edge.

Ali Jan was “catapulted backwards and fell down the slope”, where he landed in a dry creek bed, crashing into a rock so forcefully it sent teeth exploding from his mouth.

Person 4 said Mr Roberts-Smith instructed him and ­Person 11 to drag the man to a nearby tree.

Person 4 testified that, a short time later, as he walked away, he heard shots ring out and turned to see Person 11 with his rifle in the firing position while Mr Roberts-Smith stood by watching the ­execution.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934088

File: 260ce57317374aa⋯.jpg (46.69 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_at_a_Daw….jpg)

File: 50395b2646cf125⋯.jpg (131.9 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Ben_Roberts_Smith_pictured….jpg)

>>18934081

2/2

Justice Besanko also found that Mr Roberts-Smith murdered an Afghan prisoner by shooting him in the back with a machine gun and ordered another trooper to shoot a second Afghan in the head.

The alleged killing of the two detainees hauled from a tunnel during a raid on a Taliban compound codenamed Whiskey 108 on Easter Sunday, 2009, was one of the central claims against Mr Roberts-Smith.

Several SAS soldiers gave evidence for Nine that at least two men emerge from a ­tunnel (“but could easily have been three”, according to one witness) before they were led away by Mr Roberts-Smith’s patrol.

It had been alleged that ­Australia’s most decorated living soldier was complicit in the ­murder of unarmed prisoners in Afghanistan, bullied his own colleagues and bashed his former mistress.

Justice Besanko found Nine had failed to prove that Mr Roberts-Smith abused his mistress.

“I’m not satisfied Person 17’s evidence is sufficiently reliable to establish the assault occurred and that (the imputations) are substantially true,” he said.

“But they have made out a defence of contextual truth”.

Justice Besanko ruled that allegations Mr Roberts-Smith was complicit in further murders in ­Syahchow and Fasil, in southern Afghanistan in 2012, were not proven.

Other findings included that Mr Roberts-Smith authorised the execution of an unarmed Afghan by a junior trooper in his patrol; that he bullied a fellow soldier; and that he bashed an unarmed Afghan in the face with his fists and in the stomach with his knee.

Outside the court, journalist Nick McKenzie labelled Mr Roberts-Smith a “war criminal, a bully and a liar”.

“It’s a day of justice for the brave men of the SAS who stood up and told the truth about who Ben Roberts-Smith is,” McKenzie said. “There’s justice for the Afghan villagers who stood up in courts.”

Justice Besanko began reading a summary of his judgment at 2.15pm on Thursday in the Federal Court, following an attempt by the commonwealth to block the ­verdict until it had cleared the judgment on national security grounds.

The full written judgment is not likely to be available until Monday while the commonwealth’s lawyers vet the lengthy document.

Mr Roberts-Smith was not in court and is believed to be still in Bali, where he was pictured relaxing by a pool on Wednesday.

The decision comes almost a year after the trial concluded, with the judge required to consider more than 100 days of evidence given by 41 witnesses.

Justice Besanko granted Mr Roberts-Smith 42 days to digest his judgment and consider an appeal, but legal sources believe an appeal is inevitable, with Mr Stokes, reportedly still convinced of his innocence.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/ben-robertssmith-murdered-afghan-prisoners-court-finds/news-story/f76649171ae1fb23087bdfbbbbbc8fef

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934123

File: 7f21b670a558cb3⋯.jpg (123.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,Uncle_Karl_Winda_Telfer_ad….jpg)

>>18928670

State of Origin fans asked to ‘make right call’ on voice referendum

REMY VARGA - MAY 31, 2023

The Welcome to Country opening State of Origin I has alluded to the looming referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament, calling on Australians to “make the right call”.

Uncle Karl Winda Telfer addressed Adelaide Oval on Wednesday night ahead of the match between the Queensland Maroons and the NSW Blues.

Mr Telfer said the match was taking place on sacred land and Australians would need to have “serious conversations” before the end of the year.

“Today we’re not about pushing people apart, we’re about the union,” he said.

“Of us all in this great game in this great country we need to have the conversations leading up to the end of this year.

“I think we’re mature enough to make the right call yeah.”

Earlier on Wednesday legislation setting out the question and amendment Australians will vote on passed the House of Representatives with 121 ayes to 25 noes.

The voice legislation will now need to clear the Senate and the vote is expected to take place in October.

The NRL publicly backed the Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament on May 9 and at the time said the sport had deep bonds with Aboriginal communities.

“As a proud supporter of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, since 2017, the NRL is committed to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice,” said an NRL spokesperson.

“First Nations communities have deep bonds with Rugby League and are part of our fabric at all levels, from grassroots participants and fans to the Indigenous stars who light up the NRL and NRLW.

“The NRL has had its own independent voice since the commencement of the Australian Rugby League Commission.”

The Australian approached the NRL for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/state-of-origin-fans-asked-to-make-right-call-on-voice-referendum/news-story/77337ba7ec029128f2bfbb666b3279bf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934161

File: f3e93724a09f7b8⋯.jpg (50.3 KB,650x366,325:183,Uncle_Karl_Winda_Telfer_ca….jpg)

File: 3cf2b04818039cb⋯.jpg (48.61 KB,650x366,325:183,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18934123

Senator Jacinta Price slams State of Origin for using Welcome to Country ceremony to reference Voice to Parliament

The shadow minister for Indigenous Australians has slammed the State of Origin for using a Welcome to Country in Game 1 to reference the Voice to Parliament, declaring she is "sick and tired of it".

Jack Mahony - June 1, 2023

Shadow minister for Indigenous Australians Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has lashed out at the State of Origin Welcome to Country ceremony after it made reference to the proposed Voice to Parliament.

Uncle Karl Winda Telfer addressed Adelaide Oval on Wednesday night ahead of the series opener between the Queensland Maroons and New South Wales Blues where he called on the spectators to have “serious conversations” ahead of the referendum.

“Today we’re not about pushing people apart, we’re about the union,” he said.

“Of us all in this great game in this great country we need to have the conversations leading up to the end of this year.

“I think we’re mature enough to make the right call yeah.”

The mention of the Voice to Parliament divided footy fans and Senator Price was among the vocal critics.

“I’m sick and tired of it, I’m sick and tired of these acknowledgements because of nothing more than my racial heritage,” she told 2GB radio on Thursday.

“It’s every single day, 'I acknowledge and pay my respects and recognise Indigenous First Nations people in the room.'

“What for? You don’t even know everyone in the room, and why are we being singled out, purely, only because of our race?

“It’s divisive, it’s unnecessary and doesn’t actually create any beneficial outcomes for anybody. It’s becoming a little bit narcissistic to be quite honest.”

Many of the State of Origin fans watching on at home took to social media to share their views on the Voice campaign encroaching on the Welcome to Country ceremony.

"Welcome to Country just became a big political statement for the Voice. Get real," one Twitter user said.

"Was that a Welcome To Country or a lecture?" another wrote.

A third commented: "Oh right, now the Welcome to Country is now a push for the yes vote. I’ve turned the TV off… NRL keep politics out of footy.”

"First off I’m not a racist, I have zero against the Welcome to Country but you can still do that without mentioning the vote," added another.

Senator Price has been a vocal advocate for the No campaign.

The Indigenous Senator said she had been speaking to remote communities in the Northern Territory who had voiced their opposition to the proposed constitutional changes.

“This is about urban Australia’s ask of the rest of Australia, this is not about the bush and remote communities and Aboriginal people in those communities,” she said.

“They are however, being used as the supposed means to improve their lives when they’re not even part of these conversations, and the group that I spoke to at Ngukurr don’t want the Voice. They want Australians to hear what they have to say about it as well and they’re being left out of that conversation.

“It’s about those who are privileged, who have access to money already, who have access to live stadiums pushing their agenda.”

The NRL has formally joined the Yes campaign along with more than 20 of Australia’s leading sporting organisations including the AFL, Cricket Australia and the Australian Olympic Committee.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/sport/senator-jacinta-price-slams-state-of-origin-for-using-welcome-to-country-ceremony-to-reference-voice-to-parliament/news-story/19570644bab5ceecdd65ba43dc9c4aed

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934224

File: d57fa8dab2559d5⋯.jpg (489.46 KB,1920x1280,3:2,The_letter_showing_FBI_age….jpg)

File: d028db5ae1884aa⋯.jpg (1.12 MB,3500x2333,3500:2333,A_supporter_of_WikiLeaks_f….jpg)

FBI restarts Julian Assange probe despite hopes of release

Matthew Knott - June 1, 2023

1/2

United States law enforcement authorities are seeking to gather new evidence about Julian Assange in an apparent effort to bolster their case against the WikiLeaks founder, even as hopes rise among his supporters that a diplomatic breakthrough could soon see him released from prison.

The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age can reveal that agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) last week sought to interview acclaimed novelist Andrew O’Hagan about his time working as a ghostwriter on Assange’s autobiography over a decade ago.

O’Hagan, who wrote a well-known and often scathing essay about the breakdown of his working relationship with Assange, said he would not agree to an FBI interview because he opposes any attempt to punish him for publishing classified material.

The revelation of the interview request came as an unwelcome surprise to Assange’s lawyers, who did not previously believe there was an active investigation under way into Assange given it has been three years since US prosecutors issued an indictment against him.

Assange’s Australian lawyer Stephen Kenny said: “It appears they are continuing to try to investigate, which I find unusual given the amount of time that has passed since the investigation began.

“I would think it is of some concern because we have been working to try to secure an arrangement that would see Julian come home. It would be very unusual if the FBI was trying to gather evidence that could help clear his name.”

Kenny said he was not aware of any other recent attempts by US authorities to interview witnesses about Assange.

Assange’s UK-based lawyer Jennifer Robinson said last month his legal team was open to a David Hicks-style plea deal if required in order to secure his release from London’s high-security Belmarsh Prison and avoid a possible lengthy jail time in the US.

Assange’s brother Gabriel Shipton said it appeared US prosecutors were trying to prepare a new indictment or a superseding indictment against Assange.

“It shows they understand how weak the charges against Julian are and are trying to strengthen them,” he said.

London Metropolitan Police’s counterterrorism command delivered a letter to O’Hagan last week saying FBI officers in Washington, DC, wanted to speak to him.

“The FBI would like to discuss your experiences with Assange/ WikiLeaks as referenced in The Unauthorised Autobiography of Julian Assange and Ghosting,” the letter said, referring to the titles of the Assange autobiography and a 2014 essay by O’Hagan in The London Review of Books.

“I would not give a witness statement against a fellow journalist being pursued for telling the truth,” O’Hagan told this masthead.

“I would happily go to jail before agreeing in any way to support the American security establishment in this cynical effort.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934230

File: d96de739ae88bb5⋯.jpg (2.24 MB,4183x2789,4183:2789,Supporters_including_WikiL….jpg)

File: 9147d45d7abec6a⋯.jpg (6.35 MB,5555x3705,1111:741,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18934224

2/2

O’Hagan said he was surprised the FBI investigation was still ongoing and he believes the attempt to interview him “shows some desperation on their part”.

“They are using the Espionage Act to victimise an organisation that sought to hold governments to account,” he said.

“I might have differences with Julian, but I utterly oppose all efforts to silence him.”

A Metropolitan Police spokesman confirmed the letter was genuine, but said he could not comment further on the matter.

The letter stated that O’Hagan was being sought only as a witness and that his participation was voluntary.

In his London Review of Books essay, O’Hagan chronicled how he became increasingly disillusioned with Assange after being hired to ghost-write his biography, describing him as “thin-skinned, conspiratorial, untruthful, narcissistic”.

“His pride could engulf the room in flames,” wrote O’Hagan, who has been nominated for the prestigious Booker Prize three times.

O’Hagan spent extended time with Assange in 2011 – including 50 hours of interviews – for the first draft of an autobiography that was ultimately published against Assange’s wishes.

Their conversations began only months after WikiLeaks shot to global prominence by publishing a massive cache of documents about the Iraq War and a tranche of secret US diplomatic cables, based on materials leaked by former US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning.

US authorities have charged Assange with 17 counts of breaching the US Espionage Act plus a separate hacking-related charge, accusing him of being a central figure in “one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States”.

Assange’s supporters have been buoyed by several recent developments, including US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy’s decision last month to meet with a cross-party delegation of Assange supporters to hear their concerns.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has also changed his stance on the issue, saying it was time for the case against Assange to be brought to an end.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said last month that “a solution needs to be found that brings this matter to a conclusion” and he had communicated his position to US officials.

”Mr Assange needs to be a part of that, of course, and so I’m hopeful that that will occur,” Albanese added, in comments that were widely interpreted as a reference to a possible plea deal between the US and Assange.

Assange’s supporters say he is being punished for publishing embarrassing information, while prosecutors allege he “actively solicited” classified material and put lives at risk by publishing the unredacted names of people who provided information to US diplomats around the world.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/fbi-restarts-julian-assange-probe-despite-hopes-of-release-20230531-p5dcoe.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934231

File: a1d1ea6c240ce14⋯.jpg (73.24 KB,800x600,4:3,US_authorities_are_reporte….jpg)

>>18934224

Australia 'not aware' of fresh FBI probe into Assange

Tess Ikonomou - June 1 2023

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus was not contacted about a new FBI probe into WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange .

US authorities are reportedly trying to gather new evidence against Mr Assange, and have requested to interview novelist Andrew O'Hagan about his previous work as a ghostwriter on the Australian's autobiography.

Asked if he was aware of a new investigation, Mr Dreyfus said he was not until he read reports about it on Thursday morning.

"Our position has been very clear for a long time now that this matter has gone on for too long, and that remains our position," he told ABC Radio.

"We're doing everything we can to make sure that it's brought to an end."

Last month, Stella Assange addressed the National Press Club, where she pleaded for an end to her husband's detention, as he awaits extradition to the US to face espionage charges.

The Bring Julian Assange Home Parliamentary Group met with ambassador Caroline Kennedy at the US Embassy in Canberra last month to advocate for his release.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8217679/australia-not-aware-of-fresh-fbi-probe-into-assange/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18934236

File: 0864d4f0ed12989⋯.jpg (367.78 KB,825x919,825:919,KR_21.jpg)

File: 332f2c613953374⋯.jpg (217.26 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,FxfmM9TWAAE2nu_.jpg)

Kevin Rudd AC Tweet

Great to see @SenSchumer at the Capitol. It was a busy day for the Majority Leader, but we found time to talk about the proliferation of Aussies and (Australian) coffee shops in NYC, and the passage of necessary legislation to support AUKUS.

https://twitter.com/AmboRudd/status/1664051704227065856

https://qalerts.pub/?q=schumer

https://qalerts.pub/?q=[CS]

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939346

File: d5f70ba4a2400e7⋯.jpg (124 KB,634x793,634:793,Virginia_Giuffre_took_a_tu….jpg)

File: c4a594fac73cb68⋯.jpg (122.13 KB,634x784,317:392,The_two_have_been_battling….jpg)

File: 9b904a348204f7a⋯.jpg (89.04 KB,634x765,634:765,Giuffre_was_being_escorted….jpg)

File: 4c873187622098e⋯.jpg (112.07 KB,634x823,634:823,One_of_her_security_guards….jpg)

EXCLUSIVE: Newly minted Virginia Giuffre stumbles outside NYC court as she's sued for $10M by Rina Oh for publicly naming her as recruiter for Jeffrey Epstein

ANDREA CAVALLIER - 2 June 2023

1/4

Virginia Giuffre took a tumble outside Manhattan federal court after she faced Rina Oh who is suing her for $10 million for publicly naming her as a recruiter for Jeffrey Epstein.

The two have been battling it out in court since 2021 when Oh filed the lawsuit against Giuffre for defamation, citing a series of year-old tweets that asserted that Oh was Epstein's girlfriend and recruited girls for him to abuse.

Oh has said the authorities have agreed with her that she was also a young victim of Epstein 20 years ago and not a co-conspirator or part of his inner circle.

The two women were back in court in New York on Wednesday. Giuffre was being escorted from the courthouse with a suit jacket over her head when she suddenly stumbled and fell to the pavement. Security rushed to her side and helped her up.

Last year, a judge dismissed Giuffre's sex abuse lawsuit against Prince Andrew after lawyers reached a deal calling for the prince to pay her $16 million.

Giuffre has said she was one of many girls and young women sexually abused by Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell in their years-long sex trafficking ring.

Giuffre asserted in a series of October 2020 tweets that Oh was Epstein's girlfriend and recruited girls for him to abuse.

'Rina - if you read this I hope you live in shame for the rest of your life,' said a portion of one tweet cited in the lawsuit.

It continued: 'You don't intimidate me any longer & the physical & mental scares you left me with should be enough to put your a** in jail.'

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939347

File: 77842e31c85070f⋯.jpg (121.39 KB,634x823,634:823,Security_helped_Giuffre_to….jpg)

File: c52c6fd1c7edc66⋯.jpg (102.19 KB,634x823,634:823,Rina_Oh_accused_Epstein_re….jpg)

File: a3b35f74c3fc63a⋯.jpg (117.06 KB,634x778,317:389,Oh_looks_back_as_she_is_se….jpg)

File: 278cbf33a1bfca6⋯.jpg (138.83 KB,634x648,317:324,Oh_s_lawsuit_claimed_that_….jpg)

>>18939346

2/4

Another tweet suggested that Oh should be in prison next to Maxwell. Another tweet cited in the lawsuit said Giuffre accused Oh of leaving a six-inch scar on her leg from one of their encounters two decades ago.

'The sliced leg bleeding is exactly what she used to do to me, I have a six-inch scar on my left leg from her cutting me. I can let a lot of s**t go, but this I will never forget,' she tweeted before adding: '#PureEvil #LockHerUp' and tagging the FBI.

However, Oh's lawsuit claimed that none of that was true and Giuffre 'has maliciously reiterated and republished these defamations and slanders in prior and subsequent tweets and interviews on podcasts, TV and for magazines, as well as in her memoirs entitled Billionaire's Playboy Club.

It added the 'defamations and slanders' are causing Oh 'great harm,' including humiliation, shame, disgrace, mental anguish, loss of life enjoyment and anxiety and emotion distress,' according to the suit.

Giuffre has her own lawsuit as part of the allegations tied to Epstein. She sued Prince Andrew and alleged she was forced to have sex with three times when she was a teen - all under the orders of Epstein.

In February 2022, Giuffre settled the Prince Andrew lawsuit for $16 million.

'Prince Andrew intends to make a substantial donation to Ms. Giuffre's charity in support of victims' rights. Prince Andrew has never intended to malign Ms. Giuffre's character, and he accepts that she has suffered both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks,' a letter from Prince Andrew's attorneys about the settlement read.

'It is known that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked countless young girls over many years,' the letter continued. 'Prince Andrew regrets his association with Epstein, and commends the bravery of Ms. Giuffre and other survivors in standing up for themselves and others. He pledges to demonstrate his regret for his association with Epstein by supporting the fight against the evils of sex trafficking, and by supporting its victims.'

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939350

File: 2f8dff4dbfb7c06⋯.jpg (67.31 KB,634x538,317:269,A_lawsuit_brought_by_the_U….jpg)

File: 85f2068fbce4cb3⋯.jpg (62.33 KB,634x452,317:226,From_left_Staley_Lawrence_….jpg)

File: 0f579c844c4f923⋯.jpg (68.46 KB,634x463,634:463,The_revelations_came_as_pa….jpg)

File: c1dac520b7859c7⋯.jpg (71.19 KB,634x427,634:427,Between_2008_and_2012_Stal….jpg)

>>18939347

3/4

Epstein was a notorious figure long before his death inside a federal prison in 2019. In 2006 he was arrested for soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution, and in 2008 he pleaded guilty to charges in Florida.

Epstein received minimal punishment and it wasn't until years later that his sweetheart deal was revealed. That led to outrage and Epstein was later arrested on federal sex-crime charges.

He died by suicide while awaiting trial in New York.

This week, former JPMorgan executive James 'Jes' Staley accused its CEO of lying about his knowledge of bank accounts held by convicted Epstein that were allegedly used for the trafficking of young women.

He pointed the finger at Jamie Dimon, claiming that for years the CEO was involved in discussions as to whether the bank should keep Epstein as a client - even after his conviction.

The details, revealed in legal documents seen by the Wall Street Journal, cast doubt on Dimon's defense of the bank in an ongoing lawsuit arguing it did not do enough to remove Epstein's accounts and slow his horrific crimes.

But a spokesperson for JPMorgan denied Staley's claims and painted him to be a disgruntled former employee trying to wash his hands of blame and mitigate his involvement in sexual misconduct.

Staley, who went on to serve as the CEO of Barclays from 2015 to 2021 and was driven out over the Epstein connections. He has acknowledged he had a friendship with Epstein but denied knowing about the trafficking.

Another banking goliath wrapped up in the Epstein scandal is Deutsche Bank.

Earlier in May, it agreed to pay $75 million to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging the German bank also facilitated Epstein's sex-trafficking ring, according to attorneys for the plaintiffs.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs said of the judgement that the 'groundbreaking settlement' was the culmination of 'a decade-long investigation to hold one of Epstein's financial banking partners responsible for the role it played in facilitating his trafficking organization.'

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939352

File: 15c38e91b6bc7c5⋯.jpg (70.11 KB,634x808,317:404,Oh_carried_aa_copy_of_the_….jpg)

File: e6c3fc0d3c5fb55⋯.jpg (508.81 KB,825x1099,825:1099,VRG_64.jpg)

File: 75b61478d4b9259⋯.jpg (296.2 KB,2048x1024,2:1,EldG1btVgAAkUY3.jpg)

File: ed58d0c0c5a3c90⋯.jpg (173.15 KB,852x376,213:94,Q_4923.jpg)

>>18939350

4/4

These most recent allegations implicating Dimon are part of a separate lawsuit against JPMorgan, brought by the US Virgin Islands and an unnamed woman, who said she was abused by Epstein.

Dimon gave a deposition on Friday in which he denied Staley's claims. A spokesperson summarized the content of his deposition in a statement to DailyMail.com.

'Our CEO reaffirmed after his deposition that, as he has previously said, he never met with him, never emailed him, does not recall ever discussing his accounts internally, and was not involved in any decisions about his account,' it said.

Epstein first became a client of JPMorgan in 1998 and went on to hold dozens of accounts containing hundreds of millions of dollars, according to records submitted to the federal court.

The plaintiffs have previously said Epstein frequently used cash withdrawals from some of those JPMorgan accounts to pay for young women to travel to his private island so that he and others could abuse them.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12149779/Virginia-Giuffre-stumbles-outside-NYC-court-shes-sued-10M-Rina-Oh.html

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1321605000628371456

https://twitter.com/MoonProfessor/status/1321602909675552769

https://archive.is/b1ua0

Q Post #4923

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4923

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939562

File: f14d43aa4986945⋯.jpg (577.16 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Ben_Roberts_Smith_with_the….jpg)

File: a0942c68272f125⋯.jpg (120.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Roberts_Smith_s_barrister_….jpg)

>>18934029

Rogues in the ranks await their fate as a giant is toppled

Ben Roberts-Smith was always going to take a long time to hit the ground. But after five long years, the 2m-tall former SAS corporal has finally crashed to Earth. The question now is, who will he bring down with him?

CAMERON STEWART - 2 June 2023

1/3

A giant like Ben Roberts-Smith was always going to take a long time to hit the ground given that he had a Victoria Cross on his chest and had bathed in the one-time adoration of his country.

But after five long years, the 2m-tall former SAS corporal has finally crashed to Earth with a thud that could be felt across Australia. His reputation has been crushed beyond repair by the failure of his defamation case against three newspapers accusing him of murderous war crimes in Afghanistan.

And yet the trials of Roberts-Smith and a raft of other SAS soldiers who served with him in Afghanistan are only just beginning. We are now likely to see a slew of criminal prosecutions for war crimes in Afghanistan that will cast a dark shadow over Australia’s military for many years.

Even though this was a civil case and therefore had a lower burden of proof than a criminal prosecution, the result offers further confirmation that Australian soldiers participated in horrific war crimes in Afghanistan. It adds to the findings of the 2020 Brereton report which found “credible” evidence of allegations 25 Australian soldiers murdered 39 Afghan civilians. So far only one former SAS soldier, Oliver Schultz, has been charged with murder. But more criminal charges are now expected, with the Office of the Special Investigator examining “between 40 and 50” further allegations of war crimes.

Roberts-Smith himself now faces possible criminal charges.

The Brereton report recommended allegations against 19 serving or former soldiers be referred for criminal investigation. These are now working their way through the system.

Defence chief Angus Campbell admitted as much when he warned last month of some “very, very uncomfortable days” ahead for Australia’s special forces.

“There may be others and that is a matter for the OSI and, ultimately, then, a matter for the commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions,” he said. “You won’t see me trying to gloss over these things.”

For the 44-year-old Roberts-Smith, the verdict marks one of the most spectacular falls from grace in Australian public life.

In a case that became a de facto war crime trial, Federal Court judge Anthony Besanko found there was substantial truth to reports that Roberts-Smith committed war crimes, including murder.

Besanko’s decision to dismiss his defamation case against three media outlets, The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and the Canberra Times, is a major win for all media in the face of Australia’s tough defamation laws.

But the findings against Roberts-Smith have huge ramifications for the ADF and especially the elite SAS, which carried the burden of heavy fighting in the 20-year Afghanistan conflict.

His deeply ill-conceived defamation action was always a high-risk gamble given the number of his former colleagues who were willing to testify against him.

The stakes for Roberts-Smith in this case could hardly have been higher. It was an all-or-nothing gamble. As his barrister Arthur Moses previously told the court, if the charges against his client were proven it “would paint Mr Roberts-Smith as a murder … a violent person and a domestic violence abuser. It would indelibly and permanently tarnish his standing and good name”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939563

File: 8d546f25202b926⋯.jpg (142.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,SAS_Corporal_Ben_Roberts_S….jpg)

>>18939562

2/3

Another barrister for Roberts-Smith, Bruce McClintock, said: “When this material was published there could not have been a former soldier better known or more highly respected than my client.”

His lawyers argued unsuccessfully that his accusers were fantasists who were motivated to testify against him because of “corrosive jealousy” towards Roberts-Smith being awarded the VC for his ­actions in a 2010 battle in Tizak, Afghanistan.

Roberts-Smith, who took out a loan from media magnate Kerry Stokes to fund the case, has offered his VC as collateral. He faces the prospect of having the medal formally revoked if found guilty in a military court of war crimes. It is considered likely Roberts-Smith will appeal the court’s verdict.

The judgment by Besanko took about 10 months, ending an almost five-year process. The length of time to deliver his verdict spoke of the difficulty in sorting fact from fiction in the case.

Both sides in the 13-month trial relied heavily upon testimony for former or serving SAS soldiers. But in several of those cases the ­accounts given by the witnesses were utterly at odds with other supposed witnesses.

Roberts-Smith, who has always denied any wrongdoing, faced ­allegations that he unlawfully murdered six civilians while serving in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. He launched defamation proceedings in August 2018 over six articles published between June and August that year.

Besanko found that the newspapers had established substantial truth in relation to the most prominent reported cases.

These included allegations that Roberts-Smith kicked one man, a farmer called Ali Jan, off a small cliff before ordering two soldiers to drag him under a tree where the man was then shot dead.

Roberts-Smith disputed that he kicked the man off a cliff and said he was lawfully shot because he was a suspected Taliban “spotter” reporting on coalition troop movements. Besanko found that Roberts-Smith did unlawfully order his soldiers to kill Ali Jan.

In another incident, Roberts-Smith was alleged to have been ­responsible for the deaths of an elderly man and another man with a prosthetic leg who were discovered hiding in a makeshift tunnel. Roberts-Smith was reported to have ordered another soldier to execute the older man and is then said to have thrown the man with the fake leg to the ground and ­machine gunned him to death. ­Besanko found the reports established the substantial truth that Roberts-Smith “committed murder by machine gunning a man with a prosthetic leg”.

Photos subsequently emerged of SAS soldiers drinking beer from the prosthetic leg, which they dubbed Das Boot, at a party on their base.

Other reported acts of violence were also deemed to be true, ­including that in 2010 Roberts-Smith punched an unarmed ­Afghan in the face and bashed his stomach with his knee until two patrol commanders ordered him to back off. In 2012 he authorised the assault of another man in ­custody.

But Besanko found that the newspapers had not established the substantial truth in relation to two alleged deaths that took place on separate missions in 2012.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939567

File: 4f3fa65a2979665⋯.jpg (137.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,L_R_Person_11_Ben_Roberts_….jpg)

>>18939563

3/3

The defamation case pitted soldier against soldier, some of whom were former friends.

Those who criticised Roberts-Smith portrayed him as a maverick, out-of-control warrior who bullied his own troops, had no moral compass and openly flouted the laws of war under the Geneva Conventions.

Others argued he was tough but fair in his own conduct on the battlefield and that, while he was no angel, what he did was needed on the battlefield.

Back in Australia, the former Father of the Year was also ­accused of domestic violence, ­allegedly punching a woman with whom he was having an affair. ­Besanko said the newspapers did not establish the truth of this allegation but given the “contextual truth” around the incidents the ­reports were not defamatory.

To defend the defamation case the newspapers had to prove the truth of the imputations on “the balance of probabilities”, not to the criminal standard of “beyond reasonable doubt”.

Now, following the charges against Schultz, the OSI is preparing for more prosecutions of SAS soldiers who served in Afghanistan. Shultz, who has been charged with the war crime of murder, was allegedly the soldier filmed on a helmet camera shooting an ­Afghan man in a wheat field in 2012 in Uruzgan province.

Major General Paul Brereton, in his report, denied that the ­alleged atrocities involving Australian troops could be attributed to the “fog of war”. Instead, he said they were deliberate and unjustified actions which amounted to a “disgraceful and profound ­betrayal” of the military.

These included allegations that soldiers sought to cover up unlawful killings by placing weapons on the body of a person who had been “killed in action” to make it seem like they were a legitimate target.

It also spoke of the practice of “blooding” when junior officers were required to murder prisoners to get their first “kill”.

The diplomatic fallout from the Brereton findings was revealed this week when Campbell told Senate estimates the US had warned him in 2021 the war crimes allegations could impact US military co-operation with the SAS.

The shadow of the war crimes allegations has also led to arguments over medals and citations. About 3000 special forces soldiers have been allowed to keep the meritorious unit citation, but Campbell has launched a fresh ­attempt to remove awards for some soldiers.

The push has led to a furious backlash from veterans groups and by independent senator Jacqui Lambie, who questioned why Campbell should not hand back his own medals.

The Brereton report found the criminal behaviour in Afghanistan was conceived at the patrol commander level rather than in the senior commander ranks.

In an unusual move, the written judgment of Besanko will be delayed until next Monday so that the commonwealth can redact parts that breach national security.

Only then will we be able to see how the judge weighed up the competing evidence. But either way, it will make ugly reading for the ADF which knows that the ­actions of a group of rogue soldiers have tainted the brave service and sacrifice of the almost 40,000 Australia military personnel who served in Afghanistan.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/rogues-in-the-ranks-await-their-fate-as-agiant-is-toppled/news-story/57c7b264648f6ebceb86bc57eb2e8019

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939570

File: 1bbfdd88bdc46b0⋯.jpg (108.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_arrives_….jpg)

File: 58b9c387a01365d⋯.jpg (131.67 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Ben_Roberts_Smith_pictured….jpg)

>>18934029

Courtroom void tells us something about the man

STEPHEN RICE - JUNE 2, 2023

Ben Roberts-Smith won his cherished Victoria Cross charging towards danger.

He lost the honour it bestowed while draped across a sun lounge by a pool in Bali.

It’s hard to imagine a greater fall from grace – harder still to know why he chose not to front up on the day of judgement.

Roberts-Smith had turned up to court every day of the trial, sharply dressed, shoes polished, ready to stare down his accusers.

Not on Thursday, when Judge Anthony Besanko sat down to deliver his verdict.

Nine newspapers didn’t win on every allegation but they proved Roberts-Smith had murdered unarmed prisoners.

The two Nine newspaper journalists, Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters, were there – doubtless ready to argue the toss if the decision had gone against them – but there, nonetheless.

They’d staked their reputations on a hugely consequential piece of journalism and had never taken a step backwards. Good on them. Their investigation was meticulous.

The void in Courtroom 1 where Roberts-Smith should have stood on Thursday tells us something about the man.

It speaks of contempt for a judicial system that – once he got a whiff it wasn’t working for him the way he’d planned – could be left at the door like last night’s room service.

The war hero brought this case on but wouldn’t see it through to the end.

If he had left it to prosecutors to build a criminal case against him – a course ironically now much more likely – they would have been required to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt, in a court with centuries-worth of built-in protections for defendants.

Instead his accusers had only to prove their charges of murder on the balance of probabilities.

Some of those who gave evidence of his crimes didn’t even have to testify about their own sins on the battlefield, let alone be cross-examined on them.

Roberts-Smith argued he had no choice. His reputation was in tatters after the newspaper stories were published, he’d lost $475,000 in speaking engagements and even invitations to Anzac Day ceremonies had stopped.

There will be many who will sympathise with the former soldier, simply because he was one of the tens of thousands of young men and women we have dispatched over long decades to do our dirty work in foreign wars, all the while knowing in our heart of hearts that it will never be clean, because wars never are.

Nine’s barrister Nicholas Owens conceded in the first days of the trial that the men Roberts-Smith killed were almost “certainly insurgents”, but argued that even “the most brutal, vile member of the Taliban” could not be killed outside of the rules of engagement.

Many Australians will be more inclined to the view of one soldier who testified against Roberts-Smith but was nevertheless spittingly angry that a man he respected was being hounded for “killing bad dudes we went over there to kill”.

If Roberts-Smith had been content to let it go at that he’d still have half the country behind him.

But he wasn’t. He wanted to make a point and he had the country’s richest media mogul offering him a blank cheque to do it. What did he have to lose?

As it happened, plenty.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/courtroom-void-tells-us-something-about-the-man/news-story/6a4af93e1785f7d2d2a96a27caefb038

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939574

File: 21d695ac48f85b2⋯.jpg (100.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_leaving_….jpg)

File: 710d4bd0cbdfa48⋯.jpg (138.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,Corporal_Ben_Roberts_Smith….jpg)

>>18934029

A profound blow to our many honourable soldiers, but Army must be bound by rule of war

GREG SHERIDAN - JUNE 2, 2023

The devastating loss by Ben Roberts-Smith in his defamation case will deliver a profound blow to the morale of the army and the Australian Defence Force generally.

It was always a difficult case to understand. At some level, Roberts-Smith must believe himself innocent, or either remember or construe his actions differently from the way the court has. On the other hand, the evidence against him was strong.

Still, we should remember this was not a criminal case and Roberts-Smith has not been charged with any crime and he has not been found guilty of anything to a criminal standard of proof. Nonetheless, taken in combination with the Brereton report, there is overwhelming evidence that there was grave misconduct by some Australian soldiers in Afghanistan.

There are some critical things to remember. First, it was a tragedy for the Afghans wrongly killed, and for their families. But the overwhelming majority of Australian soldiers who served in Afghanistan, or who have served anywhere, have conducted themselves with decency and integrity, and borne risks that normal Australians never have to consider. We remain in their debt.

It is also the case that soldiers sent on repeated deployments to Afghanistan faced mounting psychological and personal pressures, which ultimately hurt their judgment.

Nonetheless, any Australian soldier must always bear responsibility for their own actions. Every soldier who wears our uniform is bound by the rules of war, the specific rules of engagement under which they are operating, and the general rules of morality.

All these laws allow and sometimes require fierce and deadly combat. But they don’t allow for the intentional killing of civilians or of prisoners.

There are a couple of lessons to be internalised going forward. The first is that it was insane for Australia to have a policy effectively of restricting active combat first to the SAS, and later to the SAS and Commandos. This grave policy error goes back to the Howard government and an understandable desire to avoid Australian casualties. It was thought the SAS could take care of itself. It could do the military job required and suffer minimal casualties.

But war is war. You’re either in it or you’re not. You shouldn’t undertake military action just to show an ally your heart’s in the right place. There must always be a real military purpose to any military action.

The bulk of Australian Army units deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq were never allowed to go near combat if they could avoid it.

By having the perverse view that the only part of the whole Australian Defence Force it would allow into combat was the special forces, the government placed an impossible burden on this tiny tip of the spear, and also engendered great resentment among other elements of the army who rightly felt their skills and capabilities were being underrated.

Of course, the SAS itself almost always wants to be deployed. It has a bias for action, as they say.

But governments must be wiser than this.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/a-profound-blow-to-our-many-honourable-soldiers-but-army-must-be-bound-by-rule-of-law/news-story/cc8cd404dba31a0e83ad45a066691ce0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939581

File: 6a5f4b60e121b46⋯.jpg (108.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_Bruce….jpg)

File: d633bd9970b2623⋯.jpg (71.09 KB,1024x768,4:3,Bruce_Lehrmann_outside_cou….jpg)

File: 49b8f3fe3478917⋯.jpg (54.81 KB,1024x768,4:3,Brittany_Higgins_outside_c….jpg)

>>18928680

Bruce Lehrmann discontinues defamation action against News Life Media

news.com.au - MAY 30, 2023

Bruce Lehrmann has discontinued his defamation action against News Life Media and news.com.au’s national political editor Samantha Maiden.

Earlier this year, Mr Lehrmann launched defamation action against News Corp’s News Life Media, publisher of news.com.au, and Maiden as well as Network 10 and its presenter Lisa Wilkinson.

In regard to news.com.au, he claimed two articles defamed him in their reportage of allegations by Brittany Higgins that she was raped in Parliament House in March 2019.

Mr Lehrmann was not named in these reports but claims he was nevertheless able to be identified by them.

Mr Lehrmann and News have reached an out-of-court settlement. News.com.au editor-in-chief Lisa Muxworthy said the two articles at the centre of the dispute remain online and have been updated with an editorial note. There is no apology or correction.

Muxworthy also said no damages were paid to Mr Lehrmann. A contribution has been made to his legal costs following his successful application to the Federal Court to extend the limitation period to launch defamation action.

Muxworthy said news.com.au stands by the reporting which examined how Ms Higgins’ allegation was handled by political leaders and institutions and the fallout that followed.

“We thank Ms Brittany Higgins for telling her story and for all that she has endured in making that choice to improve the system for complainants,” she said.

“We will continue to report on the general issues surrounding sexual assault allegations, our justice system and how to improve that system for men and women.”

“We continue to stand by the Australian women and men who sparked a national reckoning in the wake of this important story to drive change, reform and debate about our justice system.”

A criminal charge of sexual assault was brought against Mr Lehrmann but the trial was aborted due to juror misconduct, and a planned re-trial was later abandoned.

Mr Lehrmann has always denied the accusations against him.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/bruce-lehrmann-discontinues-defamation-action-against-news-life-media/news-story/8ee1d762e8fdc0dadc9e803f445e1fcc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939595

File: dad9fba33a05945⋯.jpg (120.04 KB,1279x720,1279:720,ACT_Victims_of_Crime_Commi….jpg)

File: 0dc03c49c033a4d⋯.jpg (122.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ms_Higgins_leaves_the_Comm….jpg)

File: 9865b584283cd51⋯.jpg (72.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Walter_Sofronoff_KC.jpg)

>>18928680

Sofronoff inquiry hears Heidi Yates knew of Higgins’s claim before it went public

KRISTIN SHORTEN and REMY VARGA - JUNE 1, 2023

1/2

Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates knew about Brittany Higgins’s sexual assault allegation a month before the former Liberal staffer publicly claimed that Bruce Lehrmann raped her inside Parliament House.

And within three days of meeting Ms Higgins, Ms Yates was accompanying her to meetings with Anthony Albanese and Scott Morrison.

The Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system on Thursday heard that Ms Yates first became aware of Ms Higgins while attending a community event, as a guest speaker, on January 13, 2021.

Ms Yates said a presenter at the event approached her during a break and told her that he was “working with a young woman who was about to make a sexual-assault disclosure” and that it “would likely attract national media attention”. He then asked Ms Yates if she would provide a message of support.

Ms Yates said the man – whose identity was not revealed – told her he was “gathering such messages” and she provided an email of “general support”.

On February 15, 2021, Ms Higgins’s rape allegation was broadcast on Network 10’s The Project and published on news.com.au.

On April 26, 2021, Ms Yates received an email from Ms Higgins’s partner David Sharaz, who she “vaguely” knew as a local news journalist. He said Ms Higgins needed help in relation to a meeting she was having with then-prime minister Scott Morrison a few days later.

The next day, Ms Yates met Ms Higgins, who sought information about systemic issues affecting victims of sexual assault that she planned to raise with the PM.

On April 30, Ms Yates accompanied Ms Higgins – at her request – to separate meetings with Tanya Plibersek, Mr Albanese, Mr Morrison and senior public servant Stephanie Foster, who led a review into practices in parliamentary workplaces related to serious incidents.

On May 5, Ms Higgins called Ms Yates and asked if she could contact the ACT Police on her behalf to get “some more information about the investigation”.

From that point, Ms Yates provided Ms Higgins with support and financial assistance throughout the police investigation and Mr Lehrmann’s trial.

Board chairman Walter Sofronoff KC is considering whether the Victims of Crime Commissioner acted in accordance with her relevant statutory framework in terms of the support she provided to Ms Higgins.

During examination, Ms Yates defended her decision to be “the public face of support” for Ms Higgins by walking into the ACT Supreme Court, past a media pack, with her each day, despite its propensity to affect the accused’s presumption of innocence.

Mr Sofronoff said by doing so, Ms Yates had decided to “really be the public face of that support”.

Ms Yates said she had discussed the decision with Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold at Ms Higgins’s final proofing meeting before the trial and that he had raised no concerns. “I say that my presence alongside her had not been objected to by defence counsel or anyone else,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939597

File: fa5cd8d35d56d9a⋯.jpg (105.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,Heidi_Yates_and_Brittany_H….jpg)

File: f87d7fa2920f20a⋯.jpg (63.51 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_strenuo….jpg)

>>18939595

2/2

Counsel assisting Erin Longbottom KC also interrogated Ms Yates’s decision to stand next to Ms Higgins during her speech outside court on October 27 last year, less than an hour after Mr Lehrmann’s trial was aborted due to juror misconduct.

Ms Yates said she did not consider whether the speech would infer that Ms Higgins’s allegations were true or that Mr Lehrmann was guilty. “Frankly, at that point, that was not in my mind, and I recognise with hindsight, that it could have been,” she said. “But at that point in time … I was ready to make arrangements to return Ms Higgins to her accommodation after a very stressful period of time.

“Someone said she wants to make a statement on her way out of court and …I wasn’t focused on what she may or may not say.”

However, Ms Yates admitted she asked court sheriffs where Ms Higgins should stand to deliver the speech.

Ms Longbottom asked Ms Yates if she spoke to Ms Higgins about the “wisdom of her giving a speech at that time”, given there would be a retrial.

Ms Yates responded: “I didn’t.

“I was aware from being copied in to several emails that she and her lawyer had been working on the matter of that statement which we’ve had for some time, and even that Mr (Leon) Zwier, as I understood it, had some engagement with Mr Drumgold about the fact that Ms Higgins was intending to do a statement.”

Ms Yates said Ms Higgins has agency to make her own decisions and it was not her role to direct her not to make certain choices.

“Our clients retain the agency to make decisions in their own lives as they navigate difficult circumstances,” she said.

But Ms Yates also conceded that, had she reflected, she might not have stood beside Ms Higgins during her speech.

“I‘m very open to the likelihood that if I had more information to consider, I may have made a different decision,” Ms Yates said.

The inquiry’s public hearings have been adjourned.

Mr Sofronoff’s findings are due on July 31.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sofronoff-inquiry-told-that-heidi-yates-went-with-brittany-higgins-to-meeting-with-pm/news-story/3f529ff14142f3983a65c2e7011430dd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939617

File: 30971b64197fc80⋯.jpg (106.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Commissioner_Yates_has_det….jpg)

File: 5d5724f335e6650⋯.jpg (96.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ms_Yates_right_said_police….jpg)

>>18928680

Victims of Crime Commissioner reveals ‘sensitive’ details about Brittany Higgins’ mental health

New details have emerged detailing Brittany Higgins’ mental health struggles after Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech. Warning: Distressing

Samantha Maiden - June 1, 2023

1/2

Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates has given harrowing evidence of calling an ambulance for Brittany Higgins when she believed there was an immediate threat to her life.

In her first day of evidence at the inquiry into the investigation and prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann, Ms Yates has revealed she was reluctant to canvass the private matters but had sought Ms Higgins permission to do so.

Detailing the multiple mental health incidents and hospitalisations that followed during her engagement with Ms Higgins, she revealed one incident followed the delay to the trial that followed Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech.

She said despite repeated attempts to secure mental health counselling and support for Ms Higgins, she was struck throughout her contact with Ms Higgins by how isolated she was and how few people she trusted.

“I was surprised, as Miss Higgins started to trust me, just how small that circle of trust was,” she said.

“There’s no doubt that she had contact with many people. But Ms Higgins’ privacy was very important to her, and other than her partner and immediate members of her family, there were very few people that she was trusting at that time.”

In May 2021, after she had conducted a second evidence in chief interview and had a bruising encounter with police, Ms Yates said she was told by police they had found evidence that Ms Higgins was searching for information about how to end her life.

“During that phone call, Detective Supt Moller told you that police were accessing Ms Higgins’ phone?,’’ counsel assisting Erin Longbottom said.

“Yes,” Ms Yates responded.

“And he expressed to you some concerns about what he found on that phone. Yes. Can you identify what those concerns were?,” Ms Longbottom asked.

“I’m just pausing here noting that these are sensitive matters,’’ Ms Yates responded.

“Supt Moller informed me that they had access to material on her phone and they were concerned that she was looking at suicide and self harm websites,” she said.

“Correct me if I’m wrong about this … the permission of Ms Higgins has been sought and obtained in order to publicly give evidence about that part of your statement?

“Yes,” Ms Yates said.

“I asked her whether her psychologist was someone that she could trust around how she was feeling, and she said that, no,” Ms Yates told the inquiry.

Ms Yates said that Ms Higgins indicated that some of the reasons that had stopped her from considering self harm in the past were no longer in place.

“She was talking about the fact that every time she went online, there was a furore,” she said.

“People were contacting her all the time. She can’t get away from it, she can’t get around the constant contact. She said for the last 100 days, ‘I’ve been finding out more about what’s happened to myself from TV’, and I don’t know how to make that better anymore.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939621

File: 92779f3de0efe32⋯.jpg (99.03 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_pictured_….jpg)

File: cdfef746be8f51d⋯.jpg (477.39 KB,1032x668,258:167,Where_to_find_help_2023.jpg)

>>18939617

2/2

Ms Yates ultimately called an ambulance for Ms Higgins to secure urgent mental health treatment.

She then detailed incidents on 16 August 2021, ten days after a summons was served on Mr Lehrmann, in late April 2022 and in June 2022, the day on which temporary stay application was granted.

“That was in relation to comments made at the Logies,” she said.

She also held concerns in September 2022 and was involved in assisting Ms Higgins secure hospitalisation during trial.

Ms Yates was also grilled on whether it was appropriate to support Ms Higgins by walking into court with her and how this related to her responsibility to uphold the right to the presumption of innocence.

“What do you say about the criticism about your decision to be that public face of support with Ms Higgins and the perception at least that infringed on the presumption of innocence of this dilemma?,” counsel assisting Erin Longbottom said.

“Those perceptions concern me greatly. And whilst they weren‘t raised during the trial, they’ve certainly been raised afterwards and need to be considered,’’ Ms Yates responded.

“In my view, those concerns, perhaps reflect a misunderstanding of my role in the justice system, noting that the ACT government in balancing rights has enabled my office to provide support and assistance to clients as they move through the criminal justice process.

“Police have the duty to investigate … and the defence counsel defend their clients right. So, if that is known and understood. I think that together we can in fact improve community faith in the justice system.”

Earlier, Ms Yates gave evidence about how she became involved in advising Ms Higgins and supporting her during the trial.

She revealed she was tipped off about the rape allegation weeks before the story broke on January 30, 2021, after she spoke at a community event.

She said another speaker approached her and said he knew of a woman who was going to make a sexual assault complaint that would “likely attract media attention.”

“By April, Ms Higgins had been public about her allegation of sexual assault and there was an interview broadcast on The Project of that year, and on April 26 you received an email from Ms Higgins’ partner,’’ counsel assisting Erin Longbottom said.

Ms Yates replied ‘Yes’.

Ms Longbottom then added: ‘”You knew Mr Sharaz from his time as a local news journalist in Canberra?”

“Vaguely, yes,’’ she replied.

The hearing continues.

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/victims-of-crime-commissioner-reveals-sensitive-details-about-brittany-higgins-mental-health/news-story/3e9d0a63d88449c03f0450aae57374d5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939641

File: 6533549de97ccad⋯.jpg (2.5 MB,5121x3414,3:2,Brittany_Higgins_centre_sp….jpg)

File: e31f9fae61924e8⋯.jpg (992.37 KB,3192x2128,3:2,ACT_victims_of_crime_commi….jpg)

>>18928680

‘She was not OK’: ACT victims advocate feared Higgins would collapse during speech

Angus Thompson - June 1, 2023

The ACT’s victims of crime commissioner, Heidi Yates, says she would have reconsidered standing next to Brittany Higgins during a televised speech after the Lehrmann rape trial was aborted if she’d known what she was going to say.

Yates, who has been publicly accused of damaging the presumption of innocence of former Coalition staffer Bruce Lehrmann by her actions in the high-profile case, has told a public inquiry she was instead thinking of the possibility of his accuser collapsing while addressing the media shortly after the mistrial.

“She was clearly not OK,” Yates told the inquiry into the handling of the case, explaining Higgins had suffered a panic attack when ACT Supreme Court Chief Justice Lucy McCallum cut short the trial on the morning of October 27, 2022, due to the misconduct of a single juror.

“I was extremely concerned for her welfare … she was still not looking well. I was concerned that should she pause outside the court and make a kind of statement that she would have another panic attack or indeed collapse.”

Yates said Higgins had to be hospitalised due to acute mental health episodes at multiple points throughout the investigative and trial process.

During that speech, in which she was flanked by Yates, Higgins criticised the justice system and the public scrutiny that she had undergone in comparison to Lehrmann.

That speech prompted Lehrmann’s trial barrister, Steven Whybrow, SC, to refer Higgins to police and the court.

“It is not appropriate for Mr Lehrmann or his lawyers to make any comment as to whether the complainant’s statements might amount to a contempt of court or offences against the ACT Criminal Code,” he said in a statement on the day.

Asked whether, in hindsight, she should have asked about the content of Higgins’ speech before agreeing with her request to stand next to her, Yates replied: “In hindsight, yes.”

Asked if she still would have stood next to Higgins had she known the content of the speech beforehand, Yates replied, “I’m very open to the likelihood that if I had more information to consider, I may have made a different decision”.

Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to raping Higgins in the parliamentary office of their then-boss, Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, on March 23, 2019, and has always maintained his innocence.

The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions, Shane Drumgold, SC, announced on December 2 last year a retrial would not go ahead due to concerns over Higgins’ mental health. The public fallout between Drumgold and police in the aftermath prompted the ACT government to launch an inquiry into the handling of the high-profile case, the terms of which include whether Yates acted in accordance with the relevant statutory framework.

Inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff, KC, said Yates was faced with the dual interests of supporting Higgins and maintaining Lehrmann’s presumption of innocence, a statutory duty she held due to her position as a human rights commissioner in the ACT.

Yates said criticisms relating to her being the “public face of support” for Higgins concerned her, but denied crossing a line by accompanying Higgins past television cameras to court to give evidence.

“If at any point through those engagements any concerns had been raised with me about the support I was providing Ms Higgins, I would have absolutely considered those,” Yates said. “It would’ve been incredibly important for me to consider and address those.”

Yates said she first came into contact with Higgins after Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, asked the commissioner to accompany Higgins to a meeting with then-prime minister Scott Morrison in late April 2021, months after she had gone public with her rape allegation.

The purpose of the meeting was for Higgins to advocate for systemic change in the handling of sexual assault claims, a function Yates said was part of her statutory remit. Yates also accompanied Higgins to meetings with then-opposition leader Anthony Albanese and Labor’s then-spokesperson for women, Tanya Plibersek.

Public hearings in the inquiry have now concluded and a report is due to be handed to the ACT government by July 31.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/she-was-not-okay-act-victims-advocate-feared-higgins-would-collapse-during-speech-20230531-p5dcs7.html?js-chunk-not-found-refresh=true

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939663

File: d0640362119623a⋯.jpg (123.46 KB,1024x768,4:3,Former_Prime_Minister_of_A….jpg)

File: c3d89706f42a042⋯.jpg (172.89 KB,1024x699,1024:699,Malcom_Turnbull_speaks_at_….jpg)

Closer China-Australia ties will not come at Taiwan's expense: Former Australian PM

Taiwan News speaks to 29th Prime Minster of Australia Malcolm Turnbull

Jono Thomson - 2023/05/29

1/2

TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — “Taiwanese perspectives and experience are more important than ever,” according to former Prime Minister of Australia Malcolm Turnbull.

Turnbull is in Taiwan for the first time to attend the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation (CAPRI) 2023 Annual Forum on Monday (May 29). Taiwan News joined Turnbull before the forum and discussed a range of topics including the Australia-China relationship, Taiwan’s role in the region, political division in democratic countries, and Indo-Pacific security.

The Australia-China relationship and Taiwan

When Taiwan News asked Turnbull if he thought improvements in the Australia-China relationship would come at the expense of Australia's relationship with Taiwan, Turnbull said he did not. “The Australian Government under (Prime Minister) Albanese has not taken one backward step on matters of substance as far as China's concerned,” he said, but “what has changed is the rhetoric.”

Australia’s relationship with China has deteriorated significantly in recent years, and China has imposed harsh trade sanctions on imports of Australian goods as a result. Australia elected a new government in 2022 that signalled it wanted to reduce tensions with China and restore trade, a move which Turnbull has expressed support for.

“Albanese as PM and Penny Wong as Foreign Minister are much more measured in their language, but they're not taking a backward step on any of the alliance issues with the U.S. or the commitment to AUKUS or any of those things,” he said.

Turnbull said Australia’s change of government was an opportunity for Beijing to change the relationship without appearing to soften its stance. “(China) needed an exit ramp where they could change policy without being seen to have backed off,” he said.

Beijing’s economic coercion of Australia did not change the Australian Government's policy at all, Turnbull said, and it had the unintended effect of galvanizing democratic countries' resistance to Chinese coercion. He said that China has exacerbated anxieties from Western countries about its rise in power through “counterproductive” rhetoric and its admonishments of criticism.

Turnbull said that Xi missed the opportunity to show the world that he was a rational alternative to the former U.S. President. “Trump was flaky, erratic, he would threaten to tear up alliances,” he said.

“Xi Jinping would have been better advised to be the exact reverse of Trump, to be steady, calm, conciliatory. Whatever Donald (Trump) was doing, do the opposite,” he said.

Instead, China has engaged in ‘wolf-warrior’ diplomacy, which has undermined China's standing in Australia and brought democracies closer together, Turnbull added.

Indo-Pacific Security and the QUAD

U.S. President Joe Biden skipped a Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) meeting set in May, instead returning to the U.S. to deal with domestic issues. The meeting would have seen the leaders of the U.S., Australia, Japan, and India meet in person to discuss security in the Indo-Pacific region, and its cancellation has led to concerns about U.S. commitment to the region.

“Almost everything that's been written about that in the media is ridiculous,” Turnbull said, adding that Biden’s absence was “overinterpreted." Biden ensuring the U.S. government functions is his top priority, Turnbull said.

Turnbull was Australian Prime Minister when QUAD meetings were raised to a leaders-level meeting and said suggestions that the QUAD would ever develop into an Indo-Pacific version of NATO were “absolute rubbish.” The relationships between the U.S. and Japan, the U.S. and Australia, and those countries’ relationships with India are all completely different, he said.

He said it is in Beijing’s interest to promote the idea that the QUAD will turn into a NATO-like alliance. “I'm very familiar with the history of the QUAD, but those people in the West who try to talk this up, particularly in America, it's really just playing into the hands of the propagandists in Beijing," said Turnbull.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939666

File: cb0e4dafd01eb20⋯.jpg (81.71 KB,800x533,800:533,A_Fox_News_flag_flies_next….jpg)

File: 9ca68daaf4f48e0⋯.jpg (144.22 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Taiwan_Premier_Chen_Chien_….jpg)

>>18939663

2/2

Taiwan's democracy

When asked about Taiwan’s domestic politics, Turnbull declined to comment, but he did speak about partisanship in democratic systems. “I think bipartisanship is very important on matters of vital national interest, defense, and national security is clearly one,” he said.

Turnbull said Australians have great admiration for the people of Taiwan and said he would like to hear more from Taiwanese about what they want for their country's future. “Nobody, least of all me, would be going around trying to stir up conflict or create any greater tensions than what already exists,” he said, but he added that democracy and its future should be determined by the people of Taiwan.

Turnbull said that the level of collaboration, public trust in government, and effective health management in Taiwan during the pandemic has been striking. “This model for multilateral cooperation should be replicated worldwide,” he said.

According to Turnbull, “Rather than looking to the U.S. or Europe for cues, democratic leaders of the Asia Pacific must build a collaborative ecosystem that guards the peaceful relations that have enabled our region’s extraordinary economic growth over the last 59 years."

Political polarization and the media

The former Australian Prime Minister delivered the forum’s keynote address on Monday and spoke about democratic leadership amid increasing populism and political polarization. He said that the widespread misinformation about the 2020 U.S. presidential election should not be taken lightly.

“The fact that a majority of Republican voters believe that Donald Trump won the 2020 election is terrifying, and if you think that country's whole political origin story is based on an armed insurrection against a legitimate government, (that) is very troubling,” he said.

Turnbull is an outspoken critic of the U.S. media company Fox News and its founder Rupert Murdoch's influence over the media. Fox News agreed to pay nearly US$800 million (NT$245 billion) in April to avoid being taken to court for promoting the falsehood that U.S. President Joe Biden had not won the U.S. election.

“That was the context which enabled the January 6th attempted coup, assault, whatever you want to call it,” he said.

Turnbull said the events on January 6 are an example of what happens when the media is incentivized to make people angrier and drive division. “I refer to it as ‘angertainment.' Their model is to rile people up, and that's very dangerous,“ he added.

Ukraine

Turnbull said that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine has, like the Xi Jinping government’s ‘wolf-warrior’ diplomacy, resulted in the opposite outcome of what was intended. “Putin's invasion of Ukraine has demonstrated the ineptitude of the Russian armed forces and united the West,” he said.

“It's resulted in the expansion of NATO. I mean, literally everything (Putin) wanted to achieve, he's got the reverse," he said.

“Putin now finds himself, effectively, a client of China,” Turnbull added. He said the lesson from Ukraine is straightforward: “Democracies must support each other.”

According to Turnbull, “The singular objective of the democracies in the Asia-Pacific is to ensure the strong will not do as they will, and that the big fish do not eat the little fish,” and the right of nations to determine their own destiny must never falter.

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4904273

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939681

File: a43106f10bbb1e8⋯.jpg (216.47 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Former_prime_minister_Malc….jpg)

File: 68d0acbb4aaecec⋯.jpg (128.61 KB,1477x1108,1477:1108,FxQlqAvakAAFCzY.jpg)

>>18939663

‘Drowning in lies’: Turnbull warns Taipei audience of internal threat to democracy

Latika Bourke - May 29, 2023

Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has told an audience in Taipei that lies and disinformation spread by “wicked” local actors poses the greater threat to democracy than from external threats such as authoritarian nations.

Speaking to the Centre for Asia Pacific Resilience and Innovation’s annual forum in the Taiwanese capital, Turnbull said the lesson from the war in Ukraine was that democracies must stand together and never falter to determine their own destiny.

In the Indo-Pacific, that meant ensuring “the strong do not do as they will. That the big fish, in [former Singaporean leader] Lee Kuan Yew’s words, do not eat the little fish,” he said.

“However, while the external threats to democracy are all too real, in my view the greatest threats are from within,” Turnbull said, singling out the January 6, 2021 insurrection when Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the US Capitol refusing to accept his election loss.

“We should not imagine this problem of disinformation is only an external one.

“Whether in the US or my country or many other democracies, there are more than enough locals who are wicked, or crazy, enough to spread lies. We’re drowning in lies.”

He said the “angertainment” news cycle threatened democracy, and that the Coalition’s 2022 federal election loss showed that indulging that anger was “electorally deadly” because it made independent candidates viable.

“In other words, the electoral system meant that traditional Liberal voters dissatisfied with their party had a centrist option – and of course it sent the most unmistakeable message, that running off to the extremes may fire up some of your political base, or your friends in the media, but can be electorally deadly,” he said.

Media programming that deliberately aroused anger among its audience divided society, Turnbull said, and that as a result, the US was now more divided than at any point since the Civil War 160 years ago.

“At the same time, as competition for the attention of viewers becomes more intense, both mainstream media channels and social media platforms seek to increase engagement by riling people up – so much news today is ‘angertainment’ – and this is delivered both by the algorithms that determine your feed on YouTube or Twitter or Facebook, and by the producers of many news channels, the former Liberal leader said.

“The consequence is that society becomes more divided, more angry, less capable of resolving issues at the centre.”

Renewing his long-waged battle with Rupert Murdoch and his media stable, Turnbull cited Fox News, and said misinformation was not simply spread by conspiracy theorists at their keyboards but by established media. Fox News last month settled a $1.17 billion lawsuit with voting machine maker Dominion Systems for broadcasting lies peddled by Trump and his allies over the 2020 presidential election.

Turnbull, also a former journalist, said the antidote to misinformation was an increase in fact-checking, from politicians to media companies and supported by advertisers. He said he had learned the hard way the potential of misinformation during the 2016 election, when Labor’s “mediscare” campaign almost unseated him from power.

“When lies are told, they have to be corrected and rebutted with great energy and speed,” he said.

“Trust can be built, and it is on a foundation of truth.

“Truth and transparency build trust.”

He cited the example of advertisers abandoning 2GB’s Alan Jones when the then shock jock attacked women leaders Julia Gillard and Jacinda Ardern.

“Advertisers also have responsibility. If a news or social media platform is peddling lies and disinformation, don’t advertise on it,” Turnbull said.

“And if you are a consumer and a particular company is advertising on a television channel that is peddling lies, tell them you won’t buy their products.

“One particularly extreme and misogynistic radio commentator in Australia lost his job because advertisers did not want to be associated with him.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/drowning-in-lies-turnbull-warns-taipei-audience-of-internal-threat-to-democracy-20230529-p5dc7p.html

https://twitter.com/caprifdn/status/1662995924636008449

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939695

File: 2d10e2a73ed19b6⋯.jpg (101.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_PLA_fighter_jet_taking_p….jpg)

File: 3bfa276944fe11c⋯.jpg (171.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,Xi_Jinping_attends_a_welco….jpg)

File: f5bbd5820137894⋯.jpg (119.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Taiwan_s_AAV7_amphibious_a….jpg)

>>18939663

Let’s not forget Taiwan as we kowtow to China on trade

PETER JENNINGS - JUNE 1, 2023

1/2

In the skies above the South China Sea last Friday a Chinese People’s Liberation Army J-16 fighter aircraft flew perilously close to the nose of an American RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft.

The US Defence Department said the “unnecessarily aggressive manoeuvre” forced the RC-135 to fly through the PLA jet’s wake turbulence. Cockpit video shows the aircrew bouncing as the J-16 turns for another approach.

A similar incident happened in December last year. On that occasion a PLA jet flew within 6m of an American aircraft’s nose.

The US view, which Australia shares when it operates in the region, is that it “was conducting safe and routine operations over the South China Sea in international airspace, in accordance with international law”.

The G7 countries stated on May 20 “there is no legal basis for China’s expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea” but Beijing aggressively asserts its exclusive military control of this sea and airspace. At some point an aircraft will be downed or a ship sunk. The region will be flung into a crisis where luck or the absence of it will determine whether we face a conflict or a military standoff.

This puts in context the Albanese government’s call to maintain the status quo on China and Taiwan. To quote the Prime Minister: “The role of peace and security and stability in the region is advanced by having a very clear position, which is support for the status quo of no unilateral action by either side.”

Xi Jinping’s military and intelligence establishment is working as hard as it can to overturn the status quo. China’s tactics are evident in every speech Xi delivers, where he calls on the PLA to prepare for war, in the frantic pace of military growth and in the frequent incidents in the East and South China seas. In this tinderbox environment, calling for the status quo while claiming that Australia has stabilised its relationship with Beijing is not masterful diplomacy.

We are hostage to the next military incident, where a close call may turn into an overnight crisis. Beijing’s strategists would be happy with an Australian policy approach that understated China’s threat to regional stability to deliver Albanese a successful visit later this year. But calling for the status quo doesn’t strengthen deterrence or stop China from positioning to intimidate or attack Taiwan and to build a pattern of pushing the democracies out of the South China Sea.

The recent Defence Strategic Review makes an urgent case to strengthen an Australian Defence Force “not fit for purpose” by adding missiles and weapons designed to reinforce Australian deterrence.

But the DSR is a casualty of delivering a temporary budget surplus. There is no new money for defence and therefore little ability to up-gun the ADF. A military strategy “fitted for but not with” funding deters no one.

Taiwan is an immediate casualty of Australia’s “small target” approach to China. As recently as the September 2021 Australia-US Ministerial Consultations meeting, the Morrison and Biden administrations “stated their intent to strengthen ties with Taiwan, which is a leading democracy and a critical partner for both countries”. No Australian minister has visited Taiwan since trade minister Craig Emerson in 2012. Taiwan was our fifth largest export market in 2021-22.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939699

File: 1cd64611e76e449⋯.jpg (110 KB,1280x720,16:9,Don_Farrell_attends_the_Jo….jpg)

File: 1c7f40486c121ab⋯.jpg (78.89 KB,768x1024,3:4,Craig_Emerson.jpg)

>>18939695

2/2

Senior Defence and security officials cannot visit Taipei because of our hardline, self-imposed restrictive interpretation of the one-China policy adopted in 1972.

Few countries understand China’s military thinking better than Taiwan. We run the risk of being called on to defend one of the few genuinely successful liberal democracies in the Indo-Pacific without having any substantive military or intelligence relationship. If Australia was serious about reducing the risk of conflict in the Indo-Pacific, the best way to do this would be to help Taiwan strengthen its own military forces. The bilateral relationship needs to be rethought.

A start would be to send Trade Minister Don Farrell to Taipei to discuss Taiwan’s proposed membership of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. It’s also time to reopen discussion of a free-trade agreement. The absence of one with our fifth largest export market is, to use a technical trade term, crazy.

Second, the Albanese government needs to allow meaningful classified exchanges on our strategic outlook. This must go beyond current diplomatic channels to include intelligence and national security agencies.

Third, Taiwan has much to offer in learning about how to strengthen national resilience, protect critical infrastructure and resist Beijing’s disinformation campaigns that try to manipulate political discussions. We should share knowledge about how the two countries have struggled successfully against Chinese coercion.

This need not get in the way of Albanese’s visit to Beijing. But our enthusiasm to sell China lobsters should not hand Xi a permanent veto on how we engage with an important trading partner, liberal democracy and vital contributors to our strategic balance. A reimagined partnership with Taiwan offers the Albanese government a chance to take a step that previous Australian governments have lacked the foresight to achieve.

This is not about shoring up a floundering status quo but building a new form of regional deterrence. In turn, that would shape a platform for more confidently dealing with China.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/lets-not-forget-taiwan-as-we-kowtow-to-china-on-trade/news-story/9c54cb982773a37f0322d1c007434c8c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939721

File: 7f4958a850d351d⋯.jpg (170.44 KB,1024x683,1024:683,The_visit_s_focus_could_be….jpg)

Battle lines drawn on Albanese going to China

Amid the negotiations over lifting the trade bans, the release of the two Australians detained on murky charges will be powerful bargaining chip in China’s uncaring hands.

James Curran - May 28, 2023

1/2

Now that the prime minister has received an official invitation to visit Beijing later this year, the political and diplomatic lines are being drawn.

The partisan political ones are expected. The opposition declares the trip a failure in the making if Anthony Albanese lands in Beijing without first securing an end to China’s trade bans.

But Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles dismisses these “simplistic platitudes”, rejecting the idea of ‘conditionality’ on the visit.

Security hawks are already crying foul, sensing a softening in Labor’s position on China. Some of the narrators of the “China threat” narrative are already venting in newspaper opinion pages.

Obviously, what ultimately counts are the visit outcomes. When Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang visits in July for talks with his counterpart Penny Wong, you can be sure that by the time he leaves they will have thrashed out the visit’s basic shape. If not, the visit is unlikely to take place.

Albanese’s visit will be a failure only if he leaves China with a vague statement about “progress” and the promise of yet more process around a further easing of trade restrictions. But the invitation in itself suggests a certain momentum on both sides.

Commercial interests

There are still important Australian commercial interests at stake. China’s informal bans on coal, copper, timber and cotton have eased, but restrictions on wine and live lobsters remain. All eyes are now on China’s expedited review of the tariffs it placed on barley. The outcome is likely to be known in late July or early August.

But consider this hypothetical – put to this column by a former senior national security official: if the trade bans are all lifted before Albanese steps onto the tarmac in Beijing, “the result will be pocketed, with thanks, and soon forgotten”.

Which could mean that the visit’s focus becomes the two Australians detained in China on murky charges: Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun. Their imminent release is paramount: achieving it by the time the visit takes place, however, will prove difficult. In that case, Albanese will have to press the matter privately with Chinese leaders. This is a powerful bargaining chip in China’s uncaring hands.

Just as important, China will have a wish list for Albanese’s trip. One question will be whether there is a joint communiqué, with the inevitable wrangling over respective visions of the region and the world.

In October 2009, a document of this kind put a floor under difficulties in the relationship, and the improvements which followed made possible prime minister Julia Gillard’s declaration of a “strategic partnership” with Beijing – later upgraded to a “comprehensive strategic partnership” under Tony Abbott. Both sides will look for areas of common action.

At the very least, as made clear during Trade Minister Don Farrell’s recent talks in Beijing, China will likely seek a statement in which Canberra says it welcomes Chinese foreign investment into Australia. Beijing will be looking for transparency, consistency and predictability in the application of Australia’s Foreign Investment Review Board processes. Still, both sides legitimately have their own sensitive sectors to protect, another principle possibly for a joint statement.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939724

File: fbea9815c6e868e⋯.jpg (1.74 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,With_dialogue_re_establish….jpg)

>>18939721

2/2

The ‘stabilisation’ narrative

Marles has already framed the visit as part of the government’s consistent narrative about “stabilisation”. That is no bad thing when the circumstances remain so fluid. Ministers have always stressed that the approach to the reducing trade impediments is incremental – “step by step”, as Wong put it.

At no point has the Albanese government claimed a quick fix to China’s trade restrictions.

Washington, no doubt, is watching closely. And not only the “stabilisation” in Australia-China relations. It must also have noted the relatively muted Chinese response to the AUKUS announcement and the Defence Strategic Review. And that’s likely because China has concluded that AUKUS is unlikely in any serious way to change the regional strategic balance against it.

Some US officials have asked recently whether the Australian business community has already forgotten the rapid downturn in the relationship from 2017. They ask: why are the China hawks now so quiet?

It is true that Washington often is typically more suspicious of Labor than of the Coalition. One need only peruse the archival record to discern American anxiety before the ascent of Gough Whitlam and Bob Hawke.

More recently, WikiLeaks cables showed US officials in Canberra wrestling with just how “pro-American” was Gillard’s stance on the relationship.

But Labor’s signature now adorns the two most significant developments of recent alliance history: Gillard’s agreement to the US marine rotation of 2011; and now Albanese’s embrace of AUKUS. Washington cannot miss that Albanese and Wong are from Labor’s Left, yet their determination is to be on the same American page.

The question is what leverage this gives Australia with Washington, and how that leverage is used.

Any American unhappiness, however, is more likely centred on the government’s failure to back the Defence Strategic Review with serious funding. For Washington, that’s a genuine credibility problem. If US observers begin to routinely twin this with Canberra’s change in tone on China, there may be some questions from Congress and the administration.

Meanwhile, in Vienna, senior American and Chinese officials emerge from two days of talks both sides describe as “candid, substantive and constructive”. Canberra will need to maintain flexibility lest it be left high and dry by unexpected moves in the US-China relationship.

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/battle-lines-drawn-on-albanese-going-to-china-20230522-p5dadh

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939748

File: 7cd773de3834e41⋯.jpg (129.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

>>18939721

‘No timeframe or conditions’ on Albanese’s visit to China

Eryk Bagshaw - May 30, 2023

1/2

Singapore: Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles says there is no timeframe or conditions on Anthony Albanese’s upcoming visit to China, signalling the Australian government was managing expectations of trade sanction relief and the release of two detained Australians.

In an interview from Seoul, where he is meeting with his Korean counterparts and Pacific Island leaders at a meeting designed to counter China’s growing ambitions in the region, Marles said Canberra would continue engaging with Beijing. Albanese announced in Hiroshima at the G7 last week that he had accepted an invitation to the Chinese capital.

“All I would say about that is we’re not about to put a timeframe on or conditions,” he said.

“Prime ministers have visited China in the past. We’re seeking to stabilise our relationship with China now, and we’re doing that in a way where we will work with China where we can and obviously disagree when we must.”

The federal opposition has called on the government to secure a guarantee that all $20 billion in trade sanctions on half a dozen industries will be lifted by Beijing before the prime minister travels. Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham has also labelled the ongoing detention of Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun “unacceptable”.

Albanese suggested in Hiroshima that the sanctions should be lifted, but did not link them or the release of Yang and Cheng as prerequisites for his visit to Beijing. The 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s first trip to China as prime minister in October is looming as a symbolic date for both sides. Marles indicated on Wednesday night no timeframe for the visit had been set.

Marles said alignment between the Australian and South Korean governments had never been stronger after a shift from Seoul to increase its diplomatic weight and draw its year-old conservative government closer to the United States and Japan.

“There’s a remarkable alignment between the way in which they’re thinking and the way we’re thinking to be honest,” he said. “The security of Korea lies in the collective security in the region and in the maintenance of global rules-based order.”

South Korea has historically been a laggard in the Pacific due to its own economic development and security threats from North Korea, but now joins the US, Japan and India in hosting an annual forum for the region which has drawn diplomatic and security approaches from Beijing. The area is critical to global maritime trade, supply lines and the defence strategies of the two superpowers: China and the US.

“It’s a real step up on the part of Korea to engage with the Pacific which is very welcome,” said Marles, who is also Australia’s Defence Minister.

“We are getting the hard power equations right in terms of the decisions that we have made in relation to AUKUS and nuclear-powered submarine capabilities, but the front line here has to be diplomacy and engaging with the countries of the region. I think that’s what Korea is seeking to do in a meeting of this kind.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939751

File: dcacf6dda391f34⋯.jpg (189.26 KB,1600x1066,800:533,Australian_Defence_Ministe….jpg)

>>18939748

2/2

But the Pacific is also stricken with economic, geographic and climate vulnerabilities, making development partnerships difficult with countries spread over more than 30 million square kilometres.

“Development challenges are tough in the Pacific,” Marles said. “You are talking about small populations in remote parts of the world where building viable economies is a real challenge.”

China has been pursuing development deals across the region, particularly in infrastructure, in exchange for closer diplomatic ties with Beijing. In April last year, Beijing signed a security agreement with the Solomon Islands. This year it will finish building the stadium for the Pacific Island Games in the capital Honiara.

“I think it is very important that Australia stays in the game,” said Marles. “If the quality of development assistance is good, then the rest takes care of itself.”

Marles will also look to smooth over any lingering concerns in ministerial meetings in Seoul about Australian defence procurement contract delays for millions of dollars in Korean-built infantry fighting vehicles after Australia launched its Defence Strategic Review in April.

Bill Paterson, a former Australian ambassador to South Korea, said that faced with the strategic uncertainties in its immediate neighbourhood, Korea saw value in diversifying its production base away from the Korean peninsula.

“But it may wonder whether Australia presents a reliable and attractive location,” he wrote for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

Marles said he believed his South Korean counterparts understood the process Australia had gone through.

“We obviously need to be making decisions about our posture and therefore, the procurements that we make in the context of what is in our national interest, but I genuinely think they understand that,” he said.

South Korea’s military industry is surging on the back of the war in Ukraine as it looks to become one of the world’s largest arms suppliers. Its Defence Ministry said its arms sales jumped to more than $25 billion in 2022, more than doubling from $11.5 billion the year before.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/no-timeframe-or-conditions-on-albanese-s-visit-to-china-20230530-p5dcde.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939765

File: 41b718884744f09⋯.jpg (2.03 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_final_vote_in_the_lowe….jpg)

File: 7248756c7395e44⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,3970x2646,1985:1323,Liberals_backbencher_Bridg….jpg)

File: b103cc715e71ad5⋯.jpg (1.82 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Former_shadow_minister_for….jpg)

>>18928670

Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum bill passes lower house

Matthew Doran - 31 May 2023

The legislation to set up the referendum on enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in the constitution has passed the House of Representatives.

The bill still needs to be dealt with by the Senate, which is likely next month, before the federal government sets a date for the poll later this year.

The final vote in the lower house was 121 in favour of the bill, and 25 against — with the Nationals and a handful of Liberal MPs voting to block the referendum going ahead.

Applause rung out across the House of Representatives after the result was announced.

Liberals who joined their junior Coalition partners in opposing it were former immigration minister Alex Hawke, former speaker Andrew Wallace, Scott Buchholz, Ian Goodenough, Luke Howarth, Tony Pasin, Garth Hamilton, Henry Pike, Rick Wilson and Terry Young.

The Liberals were not prepared to stand in the way of the referendum going ahead, despite their broad opposition to the proposed change to the constitution.

However, some Liberal MPs needed to vote against the bill to ensure the party had representation on the committee which will draft the formal No campaign's material in a pamphlet to be distributed to households.

Other Liberals, including Tasmanian backbencher Bridget Archer, have publicly backed the referendum proposal.

Ahead of the final vote, former shadow minister for Indigenous Australians Julian Leeser proposed amendments to "improve the referendum's chance of success at the ballot box".

Mr Leeser, who quit the Liberal frontbench to back the Voice, wanted references to the Voice advising "executive government" removed from the proposal put to the Australian public.

"These amendments are not about parliamentary colleagues, they're about securing the support of the Australian people — a majority of Australians, and a majority of Australians in a majority of states," he said.

"A successful referendum requires getting as many Australians as possible to vote 'yes'.

"Winning a referendum is hard, and I want the Voice to win – the alternative is too dreadful to contemplate."

While praising Mr Leeser's support of the Voice, the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said they were "neither necessary nor desirable".

"It will soon be up to all Australians to make a choice," Mr Dreyfus said.

"It will be up to the Australian people to take the opportunity offered by the Uluru Statement from the Heart in 2017, an opportunity for our nation to do better, to come together, and walk towards a better future."

Independent MP Zoe Daniel said she feared the amendments would make the proposal less palatable to the public.

"I understand the Member's good faith intention to alleviate the concerns of some, but I fear that such a change will undermine the confidence in the point of all of this among all Australians, but particularly First Nations Australians who rightly deserve something more than symbolism."

Fellow independent Andrew Gee, who quit the Nationals over their position on the referendum, agreed that the "Voice is rendered meaningless" if references to "executive government" were removed.

"If you really want constitutional uncertainty, if you really want constitutional chaos, then take out the very clause which defines the Voice," he said.

The legislation will now be debated in the Senate, which is next due to sit in June.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-31/voice-to-parliament-referendum-bill-passes-the-lower-house/102414444

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939781

File: 6ce24847168f4af⋯.jpg (79.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18939765

Linda Burney says Indigenous voice to parliament has been ‘no flight of fancy’ as bill passes lower house

ROSIE LEWIS - MAY 31, 2023

1/2

The Albanese government has been “extraordinarily careful and consultative” in forming the Indigenous voice to parliament, Linda Burney has declared, urging Australians to look at publicly available information to understand the advisory body.

The country is on track to head to a referendum between October and December this year, with the government’s legislation outlining the question and constitutional amendment that Australians will be voting on passing the House of Representatives on Wednesday.

The Constitution Alteration Bill is due to clear the final parliamentary hurdle – receiving an ­absolute majority of support from senators – in June, before the five-week winter break.

“I hear the doomsday people but I know the work that’s been done,” Ms Burney, the Indigenous Australians Minister, said.

“I know many of the individuals that are involved and coming on board. And like we’ve said, this is where the rubber hits the road. This is where the campaign actually gets into full swing.

“We have been extraordinarily careful and consultative in relation to the question and the amendment.

“We have had a First Nations working group, we’ve had a First Nations engagement group, we’ve also had the involvement – headed up by the Attorney – of a legal ­expert group, some of the best constitutional legal minds in the country. So this has not been some flight of fancy.

“This has been an extremely positive, incredibly consultative and careful undertaking.”

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said it was vital the voice be able to make representations to the executive government, and Australians should not lose sight of what the referendum was about.

When asked if the government’s greatest challenge was that people would not understand how the voice worked when they ­entered the ballot box, Mr Dreyfus said: “The referendum is about two things - it’s about recognising, it’s about listening.

“All of the distractions and misinformation and disinformation that’s been presented over the course of the last couple of weeks in this parliament, that’s not going to be what Australians have in their mind when they come to vote at the referendum later this year.”

While polling shows many Australians are unsure of the ­details of the voice, Ms Burney said they would have “an enormous understanding” if they look 15 minutes to read the voice.gov.au and Yes23 campaign websites, as well as the dialogues that culminated in the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

Ms Burney didn’t rule out ­releasing further design principles or information on how the voice would work in practice.

But she added: “I will be guided by the engagement group, the ­referendum working group and, of course, my colleagues on what ­information is available.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939784

File: eb5203ef0d0fe2e⋯.jpg (99.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18939781

2/2

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said Ms Burney’s and Mr Dreyfus’s comments were “cute and misleading”.

“The more people learn about the voice, the more they are likely to vote no,” Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

“Labor has declared the voice will be instrumental in a whole-of-government-wide change. It is vital that Australians are given the truth about how it will impact them. It’s why I quizzed departments last week about how it will impact their operations and, not surprisingly, they had no idea. This is alarming, and all Australians have every right to be concerned.”

Anthony Albanese said the referendum could be a moment of national unity, just as Kevin Rudd’s apology was. Hitting back at Peter Dutton, who has labelled the advisory body the “Canberra voice”, the Prime Minister said it did not begin in the nation’s capital and had not been rushed into.

“The voice is the means to an end. The end is about closing the gap,” he said.

HOW THE LOWER HOUSE VOTE HAPPENED

There was applause as the Speaker of the House Milton Dick confirmed its passage through the chamber, with 121 ayes and 25 nos.

The legislation – which sets out the question and amendment that Australians will vote on at the referendum – now heads to the Senate. There are increasing expectations the poll will be in mid-October.

All Nationals MPs and several Liberal MPs opposed the bill but there was an absolute majority in favour of it, as required by the Constitution in order to progress the referendum.

The show of bipartisanship was purely symbolic.

Most Liberal MPs sat with Labor in the chamber but will vocally oppose the government’s proposed voice during the campaign.

The Opposition Leader had pledged the party would support the bill so Australians would be able to have their say at the referendum.

Ten Liberal MPs designated themselves to vote against it, so they could contribute to the No pamphlet that will be sent out to around 12 million Australian households.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albaneses-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-bill-passes-house-of-representatives/news-story/683fd86914dd60477585c3c1e255a43a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939811

File: 601ee8a661bcadb⋯.jpg (91.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 2fe5fd373e91eb4⋯.jpg (136.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18928670

Indigenous voice to parliament proposal is ‘modest’ no more, says Anthony Albanese

DENNIS SHANAHAN - MAY 30, 2023

Anthony Albanese’s lack of a detailed argument supporting the Yes case for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government and his propensity to emotionally adjust to the audience he is addressing is leading him into inconsistency.

For months the Prime Minister has argued that the voice referendum proposal is “modest and gracious”.

But, under emotional influence – genuine and sincere – Albanese has declared to a highly sympathetic audience that the proposal is “modest” no more.

Albanese has repeatedly sought to play down criticisms of the potential extent of the Voice’s impact on executive government and dismiss calls to remove it from the referendum amendment by arguing the proposal is modest.

With assertions that it is not a threat to most Australians, Albanese has described the proposed amendment as modest, mainstream and conservative.

After the January 26 Invasion Day protests Albanese said he wasn’t surprised radicals were against the Voice because it wasn’t radical enough.

“I’m not surprised that some radicals are opposed to it, because this is a mainstream proposition,” he said in Tasmania on January 27.

He was even more emphatic about its modesty declaring: “This is a modest and gracious request for reconciliation by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.”

The week before he said on television: “What we will be doing is giving Australians the opportunity to enshrine this very simple change. It is a modest change, a very conservative proposal.”

At the press conference releasing the indigenous working groups’ report Albanese described the proposal, which rejected some calls to remove executive government, as “a modest request”.

Modest, gracious, not radical, mainstream and conservative – this has been the public characterisation of the referendum proposal.

“It is about reconciliation. It’s not a radical proposition. So I’m not surprised that some radicals are opposed to it. Because this is a mainstream proposition. This is a modest and gracious request,” has been Albanese’s stock response.

Of late there is the added reassurance that the vast majority of Australians will not be affected at all while those in most need will get the benefit.

“Modest” has been the go-to word to placate fears about the extent of the impact on executive government, particularly when faced with claims it is radical or an extensive change to day-to-day government.

Yet on Monday night to a highly sympathetic audience and with high emotion Albanese dropped his modesty argument.

“So let us not content ourselves with modest change,” he said in the culmination and conclusion of the Lowitja O’Donaghue oration in Adelaide.

“Let us not fill our hearts with the empty warmth of the merely symbolic,” he said.

While much of the reaction to his speech has been to his personalised insults and derision of “Chicken Little” and “doomsayer” opponents to the referendum there was a real element of truth-telling in the oration which aligned much more with demands from indigenous leaders for real influence on all government decisions from the RBA to the Barrier Reef.

The appeal to let us not content ourselves with “modest” change has changed the modest mantra.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-proposal-is-modest-no-more-says-anthony-albanese/news-story/bbaba0562c82c69f955b53ad4ee5fc45

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939831

File: 70a77a8301baeb2⋯.jpg (94.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_during_th….jpg)

File: 6076d245ea91abd⋯.jpg (268.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Juukan_Gorge_in_Western_Au….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18939811

A ‘modest’ Indigenous voice to parliament? Take a look out west to consider it’s far reaching consequences

PETA CREDLIN - JUNE 1, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese’s pitch to Australians for months has been that they should vote for his voice because it will be an important “but modest change”. Only the cat is now out of the bag with his comments in a speech to Indigenous leaders this week declaring “let this be no modest change”.

In the clearest sign yet of what will come, all Australians need to look at the enormous Aboriginal heritage changes about to roll out across Western Australia from July 1. What’s more, these changes will create a whole new land-use approvals regime that circumvents elected officials and subjects the rights of private property owners to Aboriginal heritage assessment.

Especially since the May 2020 destruction of the cave at Juukan Gorge that had been a site of human habitation for more than 40,000 years, Western Australia has been grappling with how better to protect Aboriginal heritage without obstructing reasonable development. The result is the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act, which will start to come into effect next month.

Many of the practices and procedures under this act are still being finalised, but it’s already clear that for most significant developments – instead of applying to local, state and possibly federal governments for approval – there will soon be an additional requirement to have approval from relevant Aboriginal bodies.

The act will establish, according to its memorandum, “a majority Aboriginal advisory body”, the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Council, “to provide strategic oversight of the Aboriginal cultural heritage regime”.

This will include providing advice to the minister, designating local Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Services and approving cultural heritage permits and cultural heritage management plans.

On any property larger than 1100sq m (about the size of a large suburban block), at least in areas of designated cultural significance, for any significant construction activity there will need to be permits or management plans, depending on the nature of the activity and the nature of the cultural significance. Landholders will need to acquire these from (yet to be established) local Indigenous heritage services. There are timelines set down for approvals, fees set for heritage assessors and processes for appeal if agreement can’t be reached. While the minister retains ultimate authority over land-use decisions (as was the case with the Juukan Gorge approval), there is a great deal of potential process (and cost) before anything would ever get to the minister’s desk.

The aim, says the memorandum, is to “recognise Aboriginal people’s special connection to country”; to recognise “the fundamental role of Aboriginal cultural heritage in the lives and wellbeing of Aboriginal people”; and to provide “for Aboriginal people themselves to determine what qualifies as Aboriginal cultural heritage and therefore is afforded protection under the legislation”.

The act, it says, provides “a broad definition of Aboriginal cultural heritage” to capture not only its “tangible” but also its “intangible” and its “living” elements.

Again, it’s reasonable enough to accept that there may be some elements of heritage that are merely spiritual and even that there can be new and evolving concepts of what heritage is. The issue, though, is going to be reconciling this with further economic development, especially as the act takes for granted a process of fee for service (from $150 to $450 an hour) in determining just what these might be, and negotiated financial settlements before development might take place with the administration of all this via myriad local Aboriginal elders.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939834

File: 4c5a46ebdb76b7e⋯.jpg (264.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Aboriginal_Flag_is_pai….jpg)

File: 51962a22d8d5885⋯.jpg (70.63 KB,768x1024,3:4,Trevor_Whittington.jpg)

>>18939831

2/2

A document produced last year by the big law firm Ashurst states: “Navigating the heritage landscape in project development in WA is going to get more complex over the next 12-24 months.”

The act, Ashurst says, “introduces a level of complexity and uncertainty that, in our opinion, renders key aspects … unworkable”. In particular, Ashurst worries that the local Aboriginal cultural heritage services (that in many cases have yet to be set up or exist only in rudimentary form) will lack “the capacity to function efficiently”, hence creating “massive hurdles” (despite government funding of $77 million set aside for the new regime’s implementation).

As well, the law firm says, the obligation to use “best endeavours … in the context of commercial negotiations and bargaining … will likely be challenging”.

You can bet that will turn out to be a massive understatement.

West Australian farm groups are now mounting a last-minute fight against what the Pastoralists and Graziers Association says is “the biggest attack on private property rights since native title”.

According to the PGA, anything involving ground disturbance of more than 50mm (5cm) will require an individual permit from the local cultural heritage service. This would include “weed control with mechanical equipment”, “construction of new stock yards” and the “installation of new fences”.

A more extensive management plan will need to be approved, the PGA says, for “establishing a new farm … clearing land … contour cultivation … and new forestry plantations”. The PGA is worried that this could be a costly, open-ended process potentially taking months or even years. It says real heritage sites should be protected but not the ones suddenly discovered “just where someone wants to build a new farm road or set of stockyards”.

WA Farmers chief executive Trevor Whittington is particularly concerned at the potential for invented heritage claims to be settled at an unsustainable price. Also, the lack of transparency inherent in a system that turns on cultural heritage but where landowners may not be allowed to know what makes it culturally significant due to “cultural sensitivities”.

Indeed what amounts to cultural heritage can change across time, as the new act makes clear. Yet despite the extensive consultation and protection involved in the new act, because the minister retains ultimate authority, it still has been criticised in some quarters as a “failure to prevent cultural genocide” – suggesting those wanting to restore Aboriginal sovereignty, as if the past two centuries of settlement shouldn’t count, can never be satisfied.

How has it come to this? For one thing, there’s no effective opposition in the WA parliament. With only six Liberal and National MPs in a lower house of 59, not much is going to get effective scrutiny, even if there were a will to do so. For another, with only one metropolitan newspaper, what gets attention is very much the product of just one editor’s interests. At heart, though, this is what happens when unelected and unaccountable officials try to correct a whole system on account of one scandalous mistake (at Juukan Gorge) in ways conforming to current notions of identity politics and political correctness.

What is about to roll out in Western Australia is a micro example of the far-reaching Aboriginal controls that will come with the voice. If it’s established, given its reach into executive government, there’s little doubt that a new class of Indigenous officialdom would be created.

But as for the daily endeavours on which all our livelihoods depend, regardless of ancestry or cultural heritage, these will only get harder with a new and extra layer of Indigenous governance.

This is what happens when a government forgets Bob Hawke’s bicentenary declaration that in this country there must be no “hierarchy of descent” and “no privilege of origin”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/a-modest-voice-take-a-look-out-west-to-consider-its-far-reaching-consequences/news-story/296486ae8cf05af9f3e496f1e842c969

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939852

File: 1bddba065cb3221⋯.jpg (251.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_crowd_gathers_in_Adelaid….jpg)

File: 7273879aa3b936c⋯.jpg (66.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser_at_a_press_c….jpg)

>>18928670

Don’t let No scare tactics get in the way of the Indigenous voice to parliament

SHIREEN MORRIS - MAY 30, 2023

1/2

Last week Liberal MP Julian Leeser delivered a compelling conservative case for a Yes vote in the upcoming voice referendum. He debunked some of the key scares being propagated by the No case.

Let’s examine some favourites. As Leeser pointed out, the most prolific scare of the scare campaign has been calling the voice “a third chamber of parliament”, “a fourth layer of government” or “a new House of Lords”. Leeser rejects these mischaracterisations.

“I prefer to call it what it is,” he said, “an advisory body of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, trying to better direct federal government funds to achieve better outcomes.”

The voice will be set up by parliament and evolved by parliament. Its advice will be non-binding. It will have no power to make laws or veto decisions, and there is no change to the houses of parliament whatsoever.

Some opponents argue the voice’s advice will be so compelling, it will have a de facto or virtual veto over government policy.

Leeser rejects this succinctly: “The voice is advisory,” he told parliament last week. “It won’t be Moses handing down tablets from the mountain. The parliament will still be the democratic centre of our national life. The parliament will still be supreme in matters of law and policy … And it remains with the parliament and the executive to weigh that advice, to consider and reflect on it, and sometimes to reject it.”

The voice was designed with constitutional conservatives such as Leeser in 2014 to respect parliamentary supremacy. But, importantly, the drafting has evolved since its inception from using the word advice in early iterations to now using representations. Leeser explained that representations was “much more modest” than advice. Advice implied mandatory consideration, whereas “representation only implies receipt”, he said.

As Anne Twomey told the parliamentary committee, using representations removed any argument that advice should be followed by convention just as advice from ministers to the Governor-General should be followed by convention.

In addition to the recent broadening of parliament’s power over the voice under subclause three, what began as a modest proposal has become over nine years even more respectful of parliamentary supremacy.

Some have claimed the voice’s representations would derail government decisions on everything from nuclear-powered submarines to lighthouses. Michaelia Cash even said the voice would interfere with parking tickets.

Leeser himself at one stage asked whether the Reserve Bank of Australia would have to consult the voice on interest rate decisions. Answering his own question, he rejected these claims on Wednesday. The voice “will advise on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”, he said. “It will have no interest in where the Department of Finance purchases its paperclips or its recycled paper, as some have claimed. It will not run programs or dish out grants, and it won’t have interest in submarines, as some No advocates suggest, as if our subs are going to be painted with Indigenous designs like the fuselage of a Qantas plane. And if the voice wants to lambaste the RBA on interest rates, I say: join the queue.”

The voice will be busy advising on how to close the gap in Indigenous communities – a complex and involved question. Its members will not want to squander their political influence or time advising on irrelevant matters such as submarines, paperclips or parking tickets.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939854

File: 1de48a85a503f96⋯.jpg (180.37 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

>>18939852

2/2

Silly or irrelevant advice from the voice will be ignored. And, to be clear, there is no constitutional duty for anyone to consult the voice under the proposed amendment. Any duty to consult would have to be articulated by parliament via legislation. Why would parliament require the RBA to consult the voice on interest rates? It wouldn’t.

But as Leeser says, if the voice really wants to make representations to the RBA – who cares? Anyone can do that. I put in a submission to the RBA review earlier this year.

Others have claimed the voice will stymie Australia’s national security and could even prevent Australia going to war.

Peta Credlin has provided some fantastical lines in this vein. Last month, she suggested police action on the Lindt cafe siege in Sydney could have been hampered by the voice.

“What would have happened if the terrorist in that case had been an Aboriginal man or woman?” Credlin asked. “Would the voice need to have been consulted before we deployed terror police?” She claimed a constitutional voice would be “all powerful”, so this could not be ruled out. The short answer: Credlin is wrong; such possibilities can be ruled out.

As Chris Kenny observed on Sky News, Credlin’s argument is “desperate … an over-the-top and implausible scare campaign”. There is no constitutional duty for anyone to consult the voice on any decision or action, let alone terror police having to consult the voice before saving Australians from a terror attack.

These suggestions demonstrate the tenor of the No case.

The Yes case cannot resort to lies. The case for change must deal in truth. Advocates for this change must fight fear with facts, as Leeser has done in his latest speech. And we must answer hate with love. If we do that, the Yes vote will succeed.

Shireen Morris is a constitutional lawyer and director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University law school.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/dont-let-no-scare-tactics-get-in-the-way-of-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/be0ed745b4c1afb22f053ebef1cb2a59

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939907

File: e83cec4a110dd69⋯.mp4 (15.81 MB,640x360,16:9,Voice_to_Parliament_draws_….mp4)

>>18928670

Voice to Parliament draws mixed opinions in Indigenous community of Woorabinda

Rachel McGhee - 31 May 2023

1/2

Like many in his community, Douglas Graham wants to see the town of Woorabinda — and the lives of the people in it — improve, but he is unsure if or how the Indigenous Voice to Parliament would help.

Mr Graham, the librarian at Woorabinda's Indigenous Knowledge Centre in central Queensland, has been following the public debate on the proposed Voice to Parliament.

But the Gooreng Gooreng/Lamalama man says what it will mean for his people on the ground is still unclear.

"We've had a voice … and they still haven't listened to us [since colonisation]," he said.

In its recent 2023 socio-economic report, the Australian Bureau of Statistics ranked his community as the "most disadvantaged local government area" in the country.

About 1,000 people live in the town, and while there are community-led programs in place to drive solutions, there are mixed views on whether or not the Voice to Parliament will also improve things, such as health outcomes and job creation.

Solutions within local government

Woorabinda Mayor Joshua Weazel supports the concept but is undecided on how he'll vote, as he does not believe it will deliver tangible improvements for his community.

"I support the concept of constitutional recognition, but if you really want to make change, and close this gap … the Commonwealth government needs to have the relationship directly with our communities," Cr Weazel said.

The Wakka Wakka/Pitta Pitta man said the government needed a more individualised approach when working with Indigenous communities and local government because while they all faced similar issues, they were distinctly different.

"I think it [the voice] still fulfils the notion that … decisions are being made for us, rather than us influencing what that looks like."

'Whose voice will it really be?'

Alwyn Doolan, a Wakka Wakka/Gooreng Gooreng man from Woorabinda, intends to vote no because of a lack of "reasonable consultation".

"We have over 300 different nations here on this continent of Australia … that consultation appropriately has to happen with each and every one of them," Mr Doolan said.

He said it was not a "ridiculous" ask.

"That's a custom to Aboriginal people and we have that custom practice, within our everyday lives.

"Have this referendum the right way or no way."

Mr Doolan also said it was wrong that non-Indigenous people were being asked to vote on something that "did not affect them."

"I think that all in all, we ask ourselves, 'Whose voice will it really be?'"

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939931

File: 11fb4301d3f92e3⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Douglas_Graham_believes_a_….jpg)

File: 1999fd3514b51bf⋯.jpg (476.89 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Josh_Weazel_thinks_the_gov….jpg)

File: 567d6febb254ea8⋯.jpg (438.45 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Alwyn_Doolan_says_there_ne….jpg)

File: 4f2e1f077935fb9⋯.jpg (1.27 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Wallabi_Kuudabah_says_the_….jpg)

File: c2ad3264262f72a⋯.jpg (443.89 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Diane_Hill_says_she_hopes_….jpg)

>>18939907

2/2

Opportunity to walk together

For Gunggarri/Manbarra man Wallabi Kuudabah, an Indigenous Voice to Parliament will "open doors".

"[So we can] have a better relationship with our non-Aboriginal brothers and sisters … when you open doors, you open an opportunity for us to walk together," Mr Kuudabah said.

"Today and from the beginning of colonisation, we've been restricted from practising, speaking and participating in our own society."

Mr Kuudabah plans to vote yes, but he believes there needs to be more awareness and education about the history of Australia so the general population makes a more informed vote.

"The voice … will bring an understanding that we are a very efficient race of people."

Born and bred in Woorabinda, Diane Hill has made her mind up too. She intends to vote yes.

"It's about time we were recognised as First Nations people. We were here, our ancestors were here before anyone decided to explore," she said.

Treaty first

For Douglas Graham, truth-telling and treaty should happen before any proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

"People [have] got to understand their history, especially about the constitutional history and how our people fit in there or how they don't fit in there," Mr Graham said.

Every state and territory are at different points of the treaty process, with Victoria the first jurisdiction to arrive at formal state-based treaty negotiations, which are expected to start later this year.

Queensland passed a bill in early May to set up a treaty body and truth-telling inquiry.

In the Northern Territory, the government has also been moving towards a treaty and discussions are underway in Tasmania.

In New South Wales, Labor was elected with a mandate to carry out treaty consultations.

South Australia recently moved to set up a representative "Voice" body similar to that proposed in the federal referendum.

Western Australia has not been preparing for a blanket treaty covering the state but some experts say a deal struck with Noongar people in WA's south-west is Australia's first formal treaty.

"I believe there's a time that the whole country's got to come together," Mr Graham said.

"They're saying Voice to Parliament but treaty or truth telling — I think that has to come first."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-31/voice-to-parliament-woorabinda-aboriginal-community-opinions/102370584

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18939935

File: 94beb915a10dea5⋯.jpg (94.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Queensland_opposition_lead….jpg)

>>18928670

Queensland LNP leader David Crisafulli to vote No on Indigenous voice to parliament

LYDIA LYNCH - MAY 31, 2023

Queensland’s Liberal National Party leader David Crisafulli has revealed he will vote No in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum later this year.

Mr Crisafulli, who had for months refused to reveal his position, on Wednesday said he planned to vote No but would not actively campaign against the voice.

“This is the first time I have waded into an issue at another level of government … I have done so because I am mindful that I am in a leadership position and it is important I put my views across,” he said.

Mr Crisafulli said he was concerned about “risks” of enshrining the voice in the constitution, including the potential it could undermine parliament’s power.

“I don’t feel a voice that is legislated wouldn’t be able to achieve exactly the same thing as one that’s enshrined in the constitution, (but) without that level of risk,” he said.

“I think every Australian wants to know that their parliament, people who are elected, ultimately can be held accountable and if there’s a body that could override that, then that is a big risk.”

Mr Crisafulli said he “firmly believed” that a voice created through legislation could provide advice to all three levels of government.

“My concern is if it is embedded in the constitution, what is the risk that comes with that?” he said.

“My MPs will be able to vote the way they wish and they can choose to campaign if they wish one side or another.”

Of the 34 Queensland LNP MPs, only Gold Coast-based Sam O’Connor has definitively said he’s voting Yes. Southport MP Rob Molhoek, told The Australian last month he was “leaning towards Yes, but I’m still wrestling with it”.

The highest-ranking Liberal in office, Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff, in April confirmed he would campaign “vigorously” for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice to parliament.

Mr Crisafulli has been under growing pressure from the party’s grassroot members after he voted to support Labor’s Indigenous treaty laws in state parliament earlier this month.

He insisted on Wednesday that the voice and treaties were “vastly different issues”.

The Palaszczuk government has confirmed treaty deals could cost hundreds of millions of dollars apiece and factor in the number of Indigenous people killed in historic local massacres.

Senior LNP figures and federal politicians were outraged after all 34 LNP MPs voted to pass the legislation.

Mr Crisafulli has since said the party would not “advocate” for compensation to be paid as part of treaty deals.

Branches across the state have been passing motions calling on Mr Crisafulli to rescind support for treaty laws and repeal them if the LNP wins the October 2024 state election.

Queensland’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships Minister Leeanne Enoch said the LNP would play no constructive role in the “history-making opportunity” the voice presented.

“This opposition is driven not by principle, but by fear of his backbench and fear of the far right of the LNP party machine,” she said.

“It’s now only a matter of time before David Crisafulli abandons his support for the path to treaty.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/queensland-lnp-leader-david-crisafulli-to-vote-no-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/ef504f9e971e98adada9ac900d4ad6c7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18940046

File: 1936a953fb5541c⋯.jpg (63.76 KB,1200x675,16:9,Melbourne_s_Catholic_archb….jpg)

Archbishop of Melbourne loses appeal of $2 million altar boy payout

Emily Woods - Jun 1, 2023

A Catholic archbishop has lost a bid to reduce an almost $2 million court-ordered payout to an altar boy subjected to horrific sexual abuse by a pedophile priest.

Archbishop of Melbourne Peter Comensoli launched an appeal of a Supreme Court decision to award $1.9 million in damages to one of former priest Desmond Gannon's victims, after being found vicariously liable for the abuse.

Gannon sexually assaulted the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, three times between 1968 and 1970 while he was an altar boy and pupil at a Catholic primary school in regional Victoria.

The priest drove the boy out to a remote area where he molested and raped him. He was terrified Gannon would get a shovel, kill and bury him. Gannon was jailed for up to 25 months for the abuse in 2009.

The victim said the abuse had impacted his entire life as he continued to suffer poor mental health, contemplated suicide and abused alcohol to numb his pain.

He was awarded $1,908,647 in damages, including for economic loss and future treatment expenses, by Justice Andrew Keogh in June 2022, with the judge finding Gannon's abuse to be "horrific".

"'The impact of the abuse reshaped every aspect of his life in a dramatically destructive way," he said at the time.

Archbishop Comensoli appealed the payout, claiming it should be reduced because some of the victim's injuries were caused by factors outside of the abuse.

His lawyers claimed some of the man's psychological, physical and economic injuries were caused by an unstable upbringing, his parents' separation and a culture of drinking with his peers.

But three justices rejected the appeal on Thursday, finding the archbishop's arguments were unconvincing.

The Court of Appeal judges said the victim continued to suffer the impact of the abuse to this day.

"The abuse occurred at a time when the respondent was young, extremely vulnerable and dependent on those around him for care and support," Justices David Beach, Richard Niall and Stephen Kay said.

"His ability to navigate the inevitable challenges of life was severely compromised."

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

Crisis support is available from Lifeline on 13 11 14.

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.9news.com.au/national/archbishop-loses-appeal-of-2-million-altar-boy-payout/9c6d1d5d-82e5-4f24-81e2-eab54199c736

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18940061

File: 8fabc5cf13d494f⋯.jpg (157.83 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Keith_Hartley_the_second_A….jpg)

>>18929002

>>18766087 (pb)

>>18784903 (pb)

Attack revived on AFP raid over Chinese pilot training

Miklos Bolza - May 29, 2023

A former pilot suspected of training the Chinese military has tried once more to invalidate a federal police raid on his South Australian home.

The Australian Federal Police executed a search warrant and seized items from the home of Keith Andrew Hartley, chief operating officer of the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), in November.

The warrant said Mr Hartley was suspected of breaking commonwealth law by organising and facilitating training to PLA pilots "in regard to military aircraft platforms and military doctrine, tactics and strategy".

Mr Hartley's Federal Court bid to quash the warrant was dismissed in April.

He has now filed an appeal in the Full Court seeking to set aside this dismissal.

Ultimately, he intends to invalidate the warrant and restrain the AFP from using any material seized from his home.

Mr Hartley's sole ground of invalidity was the allegation that the warrant did not sufficiently state an offence.

In her judgment tossing the challenge, Justice Wendy Abraham disagreed.

"It states conduct capable of constituting an offence, and it does so with a reasonable degree of precision," she wrote.

Mr Hartley has not been charged with any offence.

Another ex-pilot Daniel Edmund Duggan, 54, is in custody and has also been accused of aiding the Chinese military.

He faces extradition to the United States, where he will face charges of violating arms export laws and money laundering, which he denies.

Duggan's case is progressing through the Local Courts where a magistrate will determine his eligibility for surrender to the US.

His lawyers have said they intend to stay the case after raising questions about how Duggan was "lured" back to Australia shortly before his arrest.

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/crime/attack-revived-on-afp-raid-over-chinese-pilot-training-c-10803576

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18940103

File: bd62e67c2425e0c⋯.jpg (106.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Trans_activists_near_Parli….jpg)

File: 211331c2db66847⋯.jpg (155.94 KB,1280x720,16:9,Transgender_activists_hold….jpg)

File: 3c301195726a652⋯.jpg (48.56 KB,650x1000,13:20,El_Chaston_2.jpg)

>>18871739 (pb)

Why ‘gender affirming’ care is destroying our most vulnerable kids

PATRICK PARKINSON - JUNE 1, 2023

1/2

For years readers of The Australian have been made aware of the controversies surrounding the medical treatment of children who identify as other than their natal sex. But it is only recently the seriousness of the public health crisis has begun to be apparent.

This is a public health crisis caused not by a virus, not by a disease, but by a social contagion.

People who have raised concerns about these issues, as I have publicly since 2016, have been shouted down, hounded from jobs, vilified. For raising these issues, I have faced protests from student leaders and staff at the law school where I was dean. It has been very difficult indeed to get articles on the issues published in academic journals. Editorial control and peer review, so important to the tradition of good science, has been a vehicle for the most vigorous censorship in this area.

It is time for plain speaking about the issue. The transgender movement has been based on one truth and a thousand lies. The truth is that for a very small number of people, mostly born male, there can be such a disconnect between body and mind that they cannot find peace unless and until they take such steps as they can to pass as the other sex. This can involve taking cross-sex hormones and undergoing major surgeries that are difficult and risky.

Those who take this path, usually well into their adult years and after much suffering, are courageous. They deserve respect and support from us all.

But that one truth has been the nurse log on which a vast number of falsehoods have sprouted. Examples include the notion that there are not just two sexes, or that it is actually possible to change sex or be “non-binary”, or the idea that every child has an innate gender identity that awaits discovery.

Most people know these things to be nonsense, but in polite society we have been asked to pretend otherwise.

Politicians have embraced these ideas with enthusiasm – for example, passing laws that allow people to falsify their birth certificates on the basis that they now feel as if they are a different sex to the one in which they were born. Other laws have been passed criminalising the work of therapists who try to help children, adolescents and adults become more comfortable with the only body they have. Yet activists aren’t able to agree on whether gender identity is fixed and innate, fluid or socially constructed.

Fashionable ideas about sex and gender do not matter too much if no harm is done, but the medicalisation of vulnerable children and adolescents, with lifelong adverse consequences, deserves the most careful scrutiny.

Beginning about two decades ago, the Family Court decided, on the basis of some High Court authority, that such treatment required the court’s approval. In these cases, it had before it accurate and responsible medical information about what was known but also, importantly, how much was unknown, about the causes of gender dysphoria and its possible treatment.

But the Full Court of the Family Court abandoned this position in a 2017 decision, Re Kelvin, after deciding it would not read any of the medical literature offered to it.

To a great extent it relied on the affidavit of one medical practi­tioner from the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne. There was no one to contradict her exposi­tion of the state of medical knowledge. The position now is that thousands of children and teenagers are being referred to gender clinics with gender identity issues, overwhelming services. Whole groups of friends now identify as trans or non-binary. Many parents are in deep distress about what is happening with their children.

The social contagion is fuelled by unscientific ideas taught to children in schools and by YouTube and TikTok videos. Almost all secondary schools, and even some primary schools, have children who identify as a gender other than their natal sex.

A great many of these children and young people, a sizeable majority of whom are girls, are very troubled. A substantial proportion are on the autism spectrum. Others have a range of diagnosed psychiatric conditions. Most, arguably, are not in a position to give fully informed consent to medical treatment with lifelong adverse consequences.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18940113

File: 74ede6108aed5e4⋯.jpg (91.92 KB,768x1024,3:4,Professor_Patrick_Parkinso….jpg)

File: 66b2c632efe097d⋯.jpg (206.94 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Tavistock_Centre_is_ba….jpg)

File: fb9bc1ad3b65686⋯.jpg (68.34 KB,1280x720,16:9,El_Chaston_pictured_gettin….jpg)

>>18940103

2/2

The Family Court was told for years that puberty blockers were safe and fully reversible. No doubt they are, for a relatively short time. They have been approved only to delay precocious puberty, typically for a year or so. No one knows what the effects on the brain are of using them to prevent normal adolescent development for up to five years, as happens in “gender-affirming care”. The adverse impact of puberty blockers on bone density is well-known and can be serious. Without puberty blockers, the unequivocal research evidence is that most children resolve their gender identity issues before or while going through puberty; but 98 per cent of children on pub­erty blockers go on to lifelong dependency on cross-sex hormones. It appears they lock children into long-term gender incongruence.

The Family Court also was persuaded that providing cross-sex hormones such as testosterone to girls or oestrogen to boys was some sort of cure for gender dysphoria even though they can destroy fertility and seriously affect the capacity for sexual pleasure.

It turns out the medical evidence for such benefits is very weak, although no doubt some have been helped. It is far from clear that our medical professionals and public hospitals are providing the information necessary for parents and children to understand all the risks and limited scientific evidence for the supposed benefits of the treatment.

After systematic reviews of the medical evidence, the treatment has been all but banned in Finland, Norway and Sweden outside of strictly controlled research programs. England is likely to follow suit. Its major gender clinic, at the Tavistock in London, is to be closed. In these countries psychotherapeutic treatment, taking a holistic view of all the child’s mental health issues, is being used again as a frontline treatment. But not in Australia. You can risk jail in some parts of the country for providing the treatment that is recommended as optimal elsewhere.

The liability risk for “gender-affirming” doctors and state governments from malpractice and failure to obtain fully informed consent is huge, but that is not the most important issue. The health of our children and young people is what matters most. It is time now for a serious expert review of treatment practices in this area and a debate about what form of legal regulation is necessary.

Patrick Parkinson is an emeritus professor of law at the University of Queensland and a former chair of the Family Law Council.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/why-gender-affirming-care-is-destroying-our-most-vulnerable-kids/news-story/853db59f3b3281925713c9312313d5df

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18940139

File: 12ef9140baf56b3⋯.jpg (153.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Donald_Trump_Jr_demands_ap….jpg)

File: c4870e21f70cef3⋯.jpg (121.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Donald_Trump_Jr_and_his_wi….jpg)

>>18855229 (pb)

>>18860803 (pb)

Donald Trump Jr demands media apologise for airing false claims that his father colluded with Vladimir Putin for 2016 election

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - MAY 28, 2023

Donald Trump Jr has lambasted the media for airing false claims about his father’s alleged collusion with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2016 presidential election and said outlets who endorsed the claims – including the ABC – should publicly apologise.

After the release of the 316-page Durham report earlier this month, which criticised the FBI’s handling of the investigation into the alleged ties between the two leaders and found no evidence of collusion between Mr Trump and Mr Putin, Mr Trump Jr said his father was owed an apology.

“The media made millions of dollars, the country was divided and my father’s first term was hamstrung by the whole thing,” the former president’s eldest son told The Australian.

“The media got exactly what they wanted out of the Russia hoax and you’re kidding yourself if you think any of them feel even remotely bad about it.”

The FBI investigation, code named Crossfire Hurricane, probed links between people connected to Mr Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and Russian officials and spies. The Durham report said: “The speed and manner in which the FBI opened and investigated Crossfire Hurricane during the presidential election season based on raw, unanalysed, and uncorroborated intelligence also reflected a noticeable departure from how it approached prior matters involving possible attempted foreign election interference plans aimed at the Clinton campaign.”

In 2018, the ABC’s Four Corners program, led by Sarah Ferguson, aired a three-part series on Trump and Russia, with the journalist describing it as the “story of the century”.

The series remains online, ­including on video-sharing ­platform YouTube, and the ABC has never issued any apologies or corrections in relation to the program.

Mr Trump Jr said the ABC – among other media outlets – should apologise for airing the falsehoods.

“But I wouldn’t hold my breath, they would ever do that,” he said.

“It’s a lot easier for these guys to just never admit to the lies they told their audience.”

In 2019, special counsel Robert Mueller’s report into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election also could not establish claims that ­members of the Trump campaign conspired or co-ordinated with the Russian government.

Mr Trump Jr also accused big tech platforms of censorship which he said “is a risk to democracy globally”.

“Most of the big tech platforms are located in liberal San Francisco and are staffed largely by left-wing ideologues,” he said.

“The left wants online censorship not because they’re offended by people not being woke enough, but because they see it as a means to consolidating political power.”

The businessman and political activist will visit Australia in July on a speaking tour.

In response to questions from The Australian, an ABC spokesperson said: “The ABC stands by the reporting by Sarah Ferguson and Four Corners. Mr Trump Jr is welcome to do an interview with her on 7.30 while he’s in Australia.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/donald-trump-jr-demands-media-apologise-for-airing-false-claims-that-his-father-colluded-with-vladimir-putin-for-2016-election/news-story/1c94ff0f093e8f0b873659ffbedd96b7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18940223

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Memorial Day | The Last Full Measure of Devotion

United States Marine Corps

May 29, 2023

This #MemorialDay, we pay tribute to the brave men and women of the Armed Forces who made the ultimate sacrifice defending the nation’s freedom. Let us remember the greatness of past generations and find inspiration from their courage, devotion, and selfless determination. Semper Fidelis.

(U.S. Marine Corps Video by Staff Sgt. John A. Martinez)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejPIgRnHh04

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18940278

File: 471cc25bb050a69⋯.jpg (1.5 MB,852x1767,284:589,Q_4545.jpg)

File: 9208793fb839e1c⋯.jpg (192.93 KB,852x376,213:94,Q_1350.jpg)

File: 707ee501428ec55⋯.jpg (270.24 KB,852x750,142:125,Q_2039.jpg)

File: 2f5f3f1584ef1c9⋯.png (2.53 KB,310x163,310:163,UNITED_WE_STAND.png)

>>18940223

Q Post #4545

Jun 29 2020 23:19:14 (EST)

Humanity is good, but, when we let our guard down we allow darkness to infiltrate and destroy.

Like past battles fought, we now face our greatest battle at present, a battle to save our Republic, our way of life, and what we decide (each of us) now will decide our future.

Will we be a free nation under God?

Or will we cede our freedom, rights and liberty to the enemy?

We all have a choice to make. .

Evil [darkness] has never been so exposed to light.

They can no longer hide in the shadows.

Our system of government has been infiltrated by corrupt and sinister elements.

Democracy was almost lost forever.

Think HRC install: [2+] Supreme Court Justices, 200+ judges, rogue elements expanded inside DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, WH, STATE, …….removal 2nd amendment, border etc. ……… America for sale: China, Russia, Iran, Syria…….ISIS & AL Q expansion…….expansion surv of domestic citizens…….modify/change voter rules and regulations allow illegals+ballot harvesting w/ SC backed liberal-social opinion………sell off of military to highest bidder to fight internal long-standing wars……..

Their thirst for a one world order [destruction of national sovereignty] serves to obtain control over America [and her allies [think EU]] by diluting your vote to oblivion and installing a new one world ruling party.

The start of this concept began with organizations such as: world health org, world trade org, united nations, ICC, NATO, etc., [all meant to weaken the United States] also the formation of EU through threat [con] of close proximity attack [attack on one is an attack on all – sales pitch to gen public – fear control].

Re: EU _did each member nation cede sovereignty to Brussels?

Re: EU _each member must implement EU rules and regulations in all areas [think immigration, currency, overall control].

Their thirst to remove your ability to defend yourself serves to prevent an uprising to challenge their control.

There is a fundamental reason why our enemies dare not attack [invade] our borders [armed citizenry].

If America falls so does the world.

If America falls darkness will soon follow.

Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy.

Their power and control relies heavily on an uneducated population.

A population that trusts without individual thought.

A population that obeys without challenge.

A population that remains outside of free thought, and instead, remains isolated living in fear inside of the closed-loop echo chamber of the controlled mainstream media.

This is not about politics.

This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow.

We are living in Biblical times.

Children of light vs children of darkness.

United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4545

Q Post #1350

May 12 2018 22:24:18 (EST)

If America falls, the World falls.

God bless our brave fighting men & women.

They deserve our deepest gratitude.

Through their strength, and the millions of united Patriots around the World, we will succeed in this fight.

Peace through strength.

Now comes the pain.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#1350

Q Post #2309

Aug 31 2018 14:55:13 (EST)

WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL!

WE, THE PEOPLE!

FROM SEA TO SHINING SEA.

LET FREEDOM RING, PATRIOTS.

IT IS YOUR TIME.

IF AMERICA FALLS, THE WORLD FALLS.

UNITED WE STAND!

GOD BLESS YOU ALL.

Q+

https://qanon.pub/#2039

>If America falls, the World falls.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945189

File: f7c96f48dc7c2a2⋯.mp4 (15.83 MB,640x360,16:9,PM_stresses_need_for_diplo….mp4)

Albanese urges China to pick up the phone and keep line open to Australia, US

Chris Barrett - June 2, 2023

1/2

Singapore: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has delivered a message to China that the risks of invading Taiwan far outweigh the rewards, while warning that a breakdown in communication in the contested Indo-Pacific could have devastating consequences for the world.

The Australian leader also defended the country’s plan to acquire a fleet of nuclear-propelled submarines as he made the keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue defence forum in Singapore on Friday night.

Among those in the 500-strong audience at the start of Asia’s leading security conference were US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chinese Minister of National Defence Li Shangfu.

Beijing rejected a request by the US for Li to meet with Austin on the sidelines of this weekend’s event, unhappy that Washington has not removed sanctions imposed on him in 2018 over the acquisition of weapons from Russia.

It was the latest setback to attempts to ease tension between the great powers which has escalated this year amid incidents including China’s flying of a spy balloon across the US and an aerial encounter between a Chinese fighter jet and an American surveillance aircraft over the South China Sea last week.

Albanese said he supported efforts by the US to establish guardrails with China that could avert catastrophe, cautioning that “the silence of the diplomatic deep freeze, only breeds suspicion, only makes it easier for nations to attribute motive to misunderstanding, to assume the worst of one another”.

“If you don’t have the pressure valve of dialogue, if you don’t have the capacity – at a decision-making level – to pick up the phone, to seek some clarity or provide some context, then there is always a much greater risk of assumptions spilling over into irretrievable action and reaction,” he said.

“The consequences of such a breakdown, whether in the Taiwan Strait or elsewhere, would not be confined to the big powers or the site of their conflict, they would be devastating for the world.”

Speaking in Tokyo before flying to Singapore, Austin also called on China to re-open a channel between the superpowers’ militaries.

“I’m concerned about at some point having an incident that could very, very quickly spiral out of control,” he said.

Austin and Li were photographed shaking hands at Friday night’s dinner and were seated on the same table, as was Albanese, but the Pentagon said later it was not a “substantive exchange”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945203

File: 6b4263c15de2129⋯.jpg (2.46 MB,2573x1715,2573:1715,Shangri_La_Dialogue_2023.jpg)

>>18945189

2/2

In what was his most high-profile speech on the global stage since taking office last year, Albanese said “this isn’t about a policy of containment, it’s not a question of placing obstacles in the way of any nation’s progress or potential” but preventing conflict.

“In Australia, our government has put dialogue at the heart of our efforts to stabilise our relationship with China,” he said.

“We’re not naive about this process or its limitations. We recognise there are fundamental differences in our two nations’ systems of government, our values and our worldviews. But we begin from the principle that whatever the issue, whether we agree or disagree, it is always better and more effective if we deal direct.”

It was at last year’s edition of the Shangri-La Dialogue, held less than a fortnight after Labor ousted the Morrison government in the election, that a gradual thawing between Australia and Beijing began to occur.

Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles’ meeting there with his then counterpart Wei Fenghe set the tone for other top-level get-togethers including one between Albanese and Chinese President Xi Jinping on the edges of the G20 leaders’ summit in Bali in November.

There remains much strain in relations, though, with China retaining trade sanctions on some Australian products and Australia standing up for the rule of law in disputed areas such as Taiwan, which Beijing views as its own, and the South China Sea.

Relaying the details of a meeting here on Thursday between Li and Singapore Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen, Chinese Defence Ministry spokesman Tan Kefei said his government continued to pursue a peaceful reunification with Taiwan but added: “We will absolutely not promise to renounce the use of force”.

It is a path that Albanese – describing Australia as a champion for peace and prosperity – urged not be taken.

“In boosting our nation’s defence capability, Australia’s goal is not to prepare for war but to prevent it through deterrence and reassurance and building resilience in the region,” he said.

“Doing our part to fulfil the shared responsibility all of us have to preserve peace and security. And making it crystal clear that when it comes to any unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force: be it in Taiwan, the South China Sea, the East China Sea or elsewhere, the risk of conflict will always far outweigh any potential reward.”

Albanese and Marles also met with Singapore Deputy Prime Minister and leader-in-waiting Lawrence Wong at the Istana, the presidential palace. Albanese also spoke with the city-state’s ceremonial president Halimah Yacob but Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong was absent after falling ill with COVID-19.

Albanese had an orchid named and planted in his honour on the grounds of the palace – the Dendrobium Anthony Albanese – a traditional gesture of friendship towards visiting leaders and heads of state.

Australia’s prime minister will fly to Hanoi on Saturday for a two-day visit to Vietnam while Marles stays in Singapore for the rest of the security forum.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/albanese-urges-china-to-pick-up-the-phone-and-keep-line-open-to-australia-us-20230602-p5ddf5.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945219

File: 2d8efe61b716871⋯.jpg (2.36 MB,2044x1362,1022:681,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 3e4edf0a3352b5f⋯.jpg (218.57 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Li_Shangfu_China_s_defence….jpg)

>>18945189

Avoiding extremes, Albanese defines his approach to Beijing as the middle ground

Eryk Bagshaw - June 2, 2023

Singapore: The prime minister has laid out his vision for Australia’s most pressing foreign policy challenge: managing the rise of China.

This is a nuanced road map. There are threads of optimism that the region can avoid war, but it also acknowledges it may be driven into conflict and Australia must be prepared.

Anthony Albanese’s task is treading the line between the two and taking the Australian public and other countries with him.

In his first major foreign policy speech since becoming prime minister, Albanese on Friday criticised what he sees as two simplistic propositions: Australia could choose to engage with China and forget Beijing’s military and security ambitions, or it could focus on building up its defences and national security to stop the threat from Beijing.

“To move from imagining [that] conflict is impossible, to assuming war is inevitable, is just as harmful to our shared goals,” Albanese told the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore.

His middle path will require ongoing engagement with China, an openness to economic cooperation and constant reminders, however sincere, that Australia and its partners, particularly the United States and Japan, are not attempting to contain its economic ambitions.

“Our government has put dialogue at the heart of our efforts to stabilise our relationship with China. China’s extraordinary economic transformation has benefited not only its own population, it has benefited our entire region. Importantly, it is also due to our entire region,” he said.

“We begin from the principle that whatever the issue, whether we agree or disagree, it is always better and more effective if we deal direct.”

At the same time, through the $368 billion AUKUS nuclear submarine deal and the Quad, Albanese is making a long-term hard power investment in case that engagement fails.

“[By] making it crystal clear that when it comes to any unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force: be it in Taiwan, the South China Sea, the East China Sea or elsewhere, the risk of conflict will always far outweigh any potential reward.”

The Shangri-La speech had been planned by Albanese for months. It was finalised weeks ago. It shows his foreign affairs officials are thinking deeply about navigating the space between the US and China in a region that feels like it is increasingly being used as the stage for great-power competition.

“We sometimes hear our region described as a potential ‘theatre’ for conflict,” Albanese said. “As if this is merely a backdrop, a location, an arena for the ambitions of others. Such a view is entirely – and dangerously – wrong.

“Not only does such a characterisation dismiss the agency and ambition of a majority of the world’s population, and the engine room of the global economy. It also presents the future of this region as somehow a foregone conclusion.”

Albanese knew his audience. Asia’s largest defence dialogue is the only place where the green tails of generals from Vietnam, Indonesia, China and the US snake freely in and out of one hotel lobby. It is one of only two places where the Chinese and US defence chiefs meet each year. Many at the Shangri-La are anxious about how the revolving door of crises between Washington and Beijing could end if the world’s most powerful militaries are not speaking to each other. As of Friday, no official meeting had been locked in between the two superpowers.

“It’s not a good look, to turn up in Southeast Asia and not appear to be conciliatory on either side,” said the organiser of the event, International Institute for Strategic Studies Asia director James Crabtree.

“Both the United States and China have an incentive to kind of go that extra mile because that is what the region would like to see.”

Albanese acknowledged that some in the region were tired of being patronised as spectators and were being pulled between the US-led global order and China’s global civilisation initiative.

“I can assure you, that when Australia looks north, we don’t see a void for others to impose their will. We see growing and modernising economies. The fastest-growing region of the world in human history,” he said.

“And when nations such as ours choose to promote peace, we are not opting out from the big questions of security and stability. We are not choosing the smooth ride or the passive course.”

This is an ambitious position for a government only a year old. By seeking regional support and giving smaller nations a seat at the table, Albanese aims to put pressure on Washington and Beijing to come to an accord.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/avoiding-extremes-albanese-defines-his-approach-to-beijing-as-the-middle-ground-20230602-p5ddf3.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945286

File: 03b3960f9ab2a54⋯.jpg (84.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_Secretary_of_Defence_Ll….jpg)

File: ea3c99a900c51f3⋯.jpg (84.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,Singaporean_Defence_Minist….jpg)

>>18945189

Force against Taiwan still on cards, says China

WILL GLASGOW - JUNE 2, 2023

China’s Defence Minister has ­declared the People’s Liberation Army will “absolutely not” ­renounce the use of force on ­Taiwan, as his American counterpart warned a military accident ­between the two superpowers could “very quickly spiral out of control” because of Beijing’s ­refusal to engage in talks.

The scene setting comments by Minister Li Shangfu and Secretary Lloyd Austin were made on the eve of the Shangri-La Dialogue, the region’s most important security forum. The American and ­Chinese defence chiefs are both in Singapore for the three-day summit, which began late on Friday.

Mr Li made the Taiwan comments in a meeting on Thursday with Singaporean defence chief Ng Eng Hen after the two agreed to create a new military hotline in an effort to cast China as a responsible actor, although no timeline was given for when it would be ­created.

“Such high-level open lines of communications are important for strengthening mutual understanding and trust,” their joint statement said.

At the same meeting, Mr Li said Beijing would not tolerate Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party seeking support from other countries for Taiwanese independence, according to Chinese defence ministry spokesman senior colonel Tan Kefei.

That warning was issued days after Taiwanese Vice-President Lai Ching-te – the Democratic Progressive Party’s candidate in next year’s presidential election – said he wanted to personally tell Chinese President Xi Jinping to “chill out a little” and remember “peace benefits everyone”.

Beijing has refused attempts by Washington to create a functioning defence hotline. Last year, China closed the already spotty communications channels it had with the US military, as part of its response to a visit by then US house Speaker Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan.

The Pentagon this week ­accused a Chinese fighter jet of making an “unnecessarily ­aggressive manoeuvre” in recent days near a US military aircraft flying over the South China Sea.

Beijing has said America is to blame for the rising tension.

Communist Party mouthpiece The Global Times said the American military was “like a peeping Tom” and defended the behaviour of China’s People’s Liberation Army Air Force.

“To deal with the peeping Tom who crosses the line, we must pick up a stick and drive him away. In short, it is necessary to make him feel insecure and scared,” the party state masthead said. Fellow party state news outlet the China Daily said the Pentagon’s claims were “probably intended to provide ammunition” for Mr Austin, who will give a keynote speech at the Singapore dialogue on Saturday.

In an editorial on Friday, the masthead said the episode justified Beijing’s approach to refuse to talk with Washington. China has rejected US efforts to organise a meeting in Singapore between the two countries’ ­defence chiefs. “Beijing sees no point in doing so as the Joe Biden administration constantly belies its friendly words with its deeds,” the China Daily said.

Australian Prime Minister ­Anthony Albanese was to give a keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue on Friday night, and ­Defence Minister Richard Marles is also attending the event, which is swarming with senior defence and security officials.

In the days leading up to last year’s Shangri-La Dialogue, a PLA fighter jet released metal chaff into the engine of an Australian surveillance plane, which was flying in international airspace over the South China Sea.

Mr Austin said on Thursday that the PLA’s aggressive behaviour and refusal to talk with American military officials was creating a dangerous environment.

“I’m concerned about … having an incident that could very, very quickly spiral out of control,” Mr Austin said after a meeting with his Japanese counterpart.

“I think defence departments should be talking to each other on a routine basis.”

The Biden administration is continuing to co-ordinate with its Indo-Pacific allies in an effort to deter Chinese military aggression.

Mr Austin will reportedly pursue further trilateral defence co-operation between the US, Japan and South Korea this weekend.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/force-against-taiwan-still-on-cards-says-china/news-story/d1f46f5b75ee5ebbbc25d97e0c5dd99c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945341

File: 0b88de846f9d4d0⋯.jpg (122.71 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_Secretary_of_Defence_Ll….jpg)

>>18945189

>>18945286

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin backs Anthony Albanese’s call to China

WILL GLASGOW - JUNE 3, 2023

1/2

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin has backed Anthony Albanese’s call for Beijing to work with Washington to establish “guardrails” to avoid conflict and outlined Australia’s growing role in American-led efforts to deter Chinese military action in the region.

President Joe Biden’s top defence official — speaking the morning after Prime Minister Albanese gave the opening address at a security conference in Singapore — said his frequent visits to the region had underscored a widespread and growing desire for a “free and open and secure Indo Pacific”.

“As we all heard from Prime Minister Albanese last night, each country has a role to play. And the choices made by countries across the region reflect the deepening commitment to these shared principles,” Secretary Austin told delegates at the Shangri-La Dialogue, the region’s most important security forum, on Saturday.

In his Friday evening speech, the Australian Prime Minister urged Beijing to talk to Washington and work with the Biden administration to establish “guardrails” to maintain peace in the region.

Those remarks were made after China refused America’s request for Secretary Austin to meet with his Chinese counterpart Defence Minister Li Shangfu, who will address the dialogue on Sunday.

References to Australia were woven throughout Secretary Austin’s Saturday morning address to the summit, which is being held at a time of heightened anxiety over Xi Jinping’s intentions towards Taiwan.

America’s Defence Secretary endorsed Mr Albanese’s calls for guardrails, an idea long championed by Australia’s now Ambassador to America, Kevin Rudd.

“We‘re working to strengthen the guardrails against conflict … the United States believes that open lines of communication with the People’s Republic of China are essential, especially between our defence and military leaders,” Mr Austin said.

“For responsible defence leaders, the right time to talk is anytime … The right time to talk is now. Dialogue is not a reward — it is a necessity. A cordial handshake over dinner is no substitute for a substantive engagement.”

The American and Chinese defence chiefs briefly shook hands on Friday night, before taking their seats on the head table with Mr Albanese and Singapore’s Acting Prime Minister Lawrence Wong.

Mr Albanese spoke to the Chinese defence chief through an interpreter. The Prime Minister’s office has not yet commented on any feedback Mr Li may have given on Mr Albanese’s speech.

William Choong, senior fellow at Singapore’s ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, said Beijing would likely see much of the Australian prime minister’s speech as “tantamount to provocation”.

“It is highly unlikely that Mr Albanese’s comments, which are totally rational and pragmatic, will go down well with the Chinese,” he told The Straits Times.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945345

File: 760ff54f8012ddc⋯.jpg (903.28 KB,825x1865,165:373,WG_2.jpg)

File: 48ed054d34ade10⋯.jpg (382.44 KB,2048x1198,1024:599,Fxn8YwEWAAUFEeD.jpg)

File: f4929ef5ca3373e⋯.jpg (81.89 KB,1031x1031,1:1,Fxnzv1gWYAErnsL.jpg)

>>18945341

2/2

On Saturday, the US Defence Secretary said Australia was one of America’s “staunch allies” in the region and was, along with Japan, a key site for basing American forces.

Mr Austin said “the historic AUKUS partnership”, along with work with Japan on missile defence technologies, demonstrated America’s efforts to ensure its allies and partners have the capabilities that they need to deter aggression.

“More capable allies and partners magnify all of our security.”

Mr Austin said he would meet later today with Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles and their Japanese and Philippine counterparts to discuss stronger co-operation, “especially in the maritime domain”.

He also flagged the importance of next month’s Exercise Talisman Sabre, a biennial military exercise held in Australia, which will include 12 other countries.

“It will be the largest iteration ever, with more than 30,000 people participating, including a significant contingent from Japan. And it is yet another way that European countries like France and Germany and the UK are standing up for our shared values in the Indo Pacific.”

The American Defence Secretary said Washington would continue to work with allies and partners to counter China’s aggressive claims in the South China Sea, a major concern in South East Asia, particularly in Vietnam and the Philippines.

“We will continue to work to ensure that no one country can assert control over shared waterways … We won‘t be deterred by dangerous operational behaviour at sea or in international airspace.”

In his Friday evening address, Mr Albanese said Australia was working with other countries to make it “crystal clear” to that “when it comes to any unilateral attempt to change the status quo by force — be it in Taiwan, the South China Sea, the East China Sea or elsewhere — the risk of conflict will always far outweigh any potential reward.”

Mr Austin echoed that message on Saturday, focusing on the catastrophic consequences of a war in Taiwan, the linchpin of the international semiconductor industry.

“The United States remains deeply committed to preserving the status quo in the Strait consistent with our long standing ‘One China’ policy while fulfilling our well established obligations under the Taiwan Relations Act.

“You know, the whole world has a stake in maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait — the whole world. The security of commercial shipping lanes and global supply chains depend on it. And so does freedom of navigation worldwide.

“Conflict in the Taiwan Strait would be devastating. So we are determined to maintain peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. And so are a number of countries around other countries around the world, and that number continues to grow.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/us-defence-secretary-lloyd-austin-backs-anthony-albaneses-call-to-china/news-story/bd7c754f90e36bbb7be3ac963edf00b6

https://twitter.com/wmdglasgow/status/1664639060571201540

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945729

File: deaad4e38b1b553⋯.jpg (2.68 MB,6496x4872,4:3,Human_rights_lawyer_and_Je….jpg)

File: 9d2a1d628cd4d2f⋯.jpg (1.16 MB,3891x2594,3:2,Father_Brennan_presented_a….jpg)

>>18928670

Father Brennan tells Albanese and Dutton to find common ground on Voice

Rob Harris - June 3, 2023

Rome: One of the Catholic Church’s leading proponents of the Indigenous Voice to parliament fears the referendum will leave Australians divided – no matter the result – and he lays the blame on both sides of politics for not striving harder to find common ground.

Father Frank Brennan, a Jesuit priest and human rights lawyer, will use a lecture in Rome on Saturday to urge Australians to recommit themselves to a “deep inner listening” towards each other and the land. He will remind Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton that they bear responsibility for the tone of the debate.

Brennan presented a copy of his book on the subject, An Indigenous Voice to Parliament: Considering a Constitutional Bridge, which was released in March, to Pope Francis when they met at the Vatican this week. Brennan dedicated the copy to the 86-year-old with an inscription reading “hoping and praying for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament”.

Along with the visit of Indigenous elder Miriam-Rose Ungunmerr Baumann to the Vatican for reconciliation talks with the church this week, Brennan’s speech to the Pontifical Gregorian University will offer a contemporary Australian perspective on the recognition of Aboriginal rights, and warn that voters will face a stark choice in the referendum, slated to be held in October.

“Neither side of the parliamentary chamber has done what was needed to bring the country together, to bring reconciliation in our land, to bring the country to ‘Yes’,” Brennan says in a draft copy of his address circulated on Friday.

“Whichever way the referendum goes, we will be left with a country divided, and that is a tragedy.”

The long-time Indigenous rights advocate has been a prominent critic of the breadth of the federal government’s proposed referendum question, arguing that its reference to the Voice making representations to executive government raises the prospect of many legal challenges.

The issue of the potential for legal challenges is one that divides legal experts, with a number of authorities maintaining there is no problem, including Brennan’s own brother, leading litigator Tom Brennan, SC. Their father, the late Sir Gerard Brennan, was a former High Court chief justice and wrote the lead judgment in the Mabo case.

Brennan hopes a “reconciling spirit” will blow through the chambers of parliament during the next three weeks while elected leaders lay the groundwork for the three-month campaign but said, given the reluctance of all major political parties to consider any amendments to the proposed change to the Constitution, the wording of the change “might not be perfect”.

Previously a member of the Indigenous Voice co-design senior advisory group, Brennan argued changing the wording from “executive government” to “ministers of state” could broaden support for the referendum.

He will tell the audience in Rome that, while the government has gone so far as to assure the parliament that it would have the power to legislate whether and how representations by the Voice need to be considered by the executive government, it should “tweak the words” to ensure that public servants performing routine administrative tasks will not be required to consider representations by the Voice.

“We can vote ‘No’ to a constitutionally enshrined Voice either because we continue to think that all constitutional entitlements should be held ‘in common with all other Australians’ or because we are not convinced that the Voice will work effectively; or we can vote ‘Yes’ because, whatever the imperfections of the wording and the risk of future complications, we think it is high time that Australia’s First Peoples were recognised in the Constitution in a manner sought and approved by a broad cross-section of Indigenous leaders.”

Brennan will say that, while only eight out of 44 referendums have succeeded in Australia since federation, he hopes “this one will be the 9th”.

“May the Australian people bring the country to ‘Yes’, recognising the rights of our First Peoples who have occupied the Great South Land of the Holy Spirit for tens of thousands of years,” he says.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/father-brennan-tells-albanese-and-dutton-to-find-common-ground-on-voice-20230602-p5ddd0.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945799

File: f089f9e1e72b615⋯.jpg (82.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,Race_Discrimination_Commis….jpg)

File: 71dfc5bb1180feb⋯.jpg (152.45 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Price_and_….jpg)

>>18928670

It’s not the No camp that’s highlighting race in Indigenous voice to parliament debate

JACINTA NAMPIJINPA PRICE - JUNE 3, 2023

1/2

Everywhere I go in Australia today, discourse on matters of national interest lends itself to a racially intense focus. The debate surrounding the voice to parliament cannot exist without such discourse, whether Race Discrimination Commissioner Chin Tan likes it or not.

This week Tan appealed to political leaders and the media to steer clear of making race the focus of the voice to parliament debate, warning it would embolden racists and expose Indigenous Australians to abuse and vilification.

But asking Australians to avoid highlighting race in the voice debate is like asking someone to avoid getting wet walking through monsoonal rains. This is not the fault of everyday Australians but of the unyielding activist class that for the past decade has doused petrol on the flames of identity politics.

As an Australian with Warlpiri heritage, I would love to experience a day where my racial identity wasn’t brought into focus. I would love not to be forced to feel singled out through superficial acknowledgments or alleged respect for nothing more than my racial heritage. This is tokenism writ large and paternalism of the highest order.

Those who are pushing this actually ingrain the racial stereotype that Australians of Aboriginal heritage think the same. Through what has now become the formula of public discourse towards Indigenous Australians, we are effectively robbed of individuality. We are not afforded individual freedom or respect based on our unique human capabilities.

Nothing exemplifies this notion more than the Uluru Statement from the Heart. The dialogues that culminated in the statement were strategically held with invited-only, unelected individuals of Aboriginal heritage as well as a selection of non-Indigenous Australians.

The outcome seemed to be predetermined by Megan Davis and Noel Pearson, both individuals who have no cultural connection to Uluru itself. The use of Uluru as the backdrop has been the perfect campaign PR tool, as has the physical statement itself, adorned by desert art and the signatures of 250 unelected and hand-picked individuals.

Reliant on the goodwill of everyday Australians, proponents of the voice sell the Uluru statement to the Australian people with the racial – and incorrect – stereotype of uniform Indigenous groupthink. The 250 signatures representing individuals who make up 0.03 per cent of a population demographic are not a sound representation of that demographic. Caught up in cultural romanticism and a yearning to better the lives of our most marginalised, non-Indigenous Australians buy into the Uluru Statement from the Heart as gospel.

Imposed on us is the victim narrative that sustains a multibillion-dollar industry that works in two ways: to justify its existence, and to discourage and disparage anyone who seeks to call it into question. The referendum asks Australians to enshrine this industry and narrative into our Constitution.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945802

File: a82e3687e7eba18⋯.jpg (159.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_leaders_Noel_Pe….jpg)

File: c5c40c01690298c⋯.jpg (474.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Nationals_senator_Jacinta_….jpg)

>>18945799

2/2

We teach our children that emotional blackmail and name calling is unhealthy, and as adults in personal relationships these behaviours are characterised as coercive control. The voice to parliament debate has been captured by these tactics, which have been weaponised by proponents of the voice throughout debate.

One has to question why Tan has only now offered his opinion as the Race Discrimination Commissioner on the flavour of debate regarding the voice, given there have already been a number of racially pugnacious comments made by proponents of the voice.

In November last year, following our National Party announcement to officially oppose the voice, Pearson made racially vilifying and unchallenged comments directed at me on ABC Radio National that he then repeated in The Australian last month.

In December last year, Marcia Langton made references to “nasty, eugenicist, 19th-century style of debate about the superior race versus the inferior race”.

Again in April this year, Pearson deliberately took aim at my predecessor as opposition spokesman for Indigenous Australians, and a Liberal colleague of Jewish heritage, Julian Leeser, in his comments: “I’m wondering whether Julian expects us to wear a tattoo identifying ourselves as Indigenous. Or that our clothes should be adorned with some kind of badge identifying us as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.”

Why has Tan not publicly condemned these racially charged and vilifying comments? And why is it only when Peter Dutton points out the racially divisive nature of this referendum – and the fact it seeks to enshrine racial division in our nation – does our Race Discrimination Commissioner suddenly show concern?

Whether we like it or not, racial discrimination (negative or positive) is still discrimination and enshrining it into our Constitution is enshrining discrimination. Truth telling means providing detail, yet no such detail has been provided. Telling the truth is uncomfortable but weaponising the accusation of racism to stifle debate while ignoring real racism is undemocratic.

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price is a CLP senator for the Northern Territory.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/its-not-the-no-camp-thats-highlighting-race-in-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-debate/news-story/0bbf63c9ddaa61b2edf4e73a4fb05915

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945832

File: 6f2d653db18642e⋯.jpg (214.19 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australia_s_most_senior_he….jpg)

File: 54919f56251dd6d⋯.jpg (79.87 KB,1280x720,16:9,Secretary_of_the_Departmen….jpg)

File: f4d3c4cf3dc285e⋯.jpg (82.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_AMA_President_Micha….jpg)

>>18940103

Health leaders reject the need for oversight of transgender medicine

NATASHA ROBINSON and JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - JUNE 2, 2023

Australia’s most senior health leaders have dismissed suggestions the commonwealth should take a greater oversight and regulatory role in the prescription of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children as the federal government admits it has no idea how widely the drugs are being prescribed off-label for gender dysphoria.

Therapeutic Goods Administration chief medical adviser Robyn Langham was asked in Senate estimates if it was appropriate the federal agency regulates the use of androgen-blocking drugs that are approved for the treatment of prostate cancer but are prescribed off-label to children to halt the progress of puberty.

There is concern among some physicians in Australia and internationally at the long-term effects of the puberty-blocker drugs on children experiencing gender dysphoria being prescribed the medications from as young as 10 years.

Professor Langham said it was up to individuals doctors to use their clinical judgment in prescribing the drugs and the TGA had no role in the matter. “Where doctors wish to prescribe off-label, we do not regulate doctors’ practice,” she said in response to questions from Nationals senator Matt Canavan.

“When a doctor chooses to do that, they do so in the full knowledge that they are accepting all of the legal responsibility, that they understand the research and they get full consent of their patients.”

Commonwealth health department secretary Brendan Murphy also rejected any need for greater oversight of gender-affirming medicine and the treatment of children in the wake of the Cass review in the UK, which identified “gaps in the evidence base” on the prescription of hormone drugs to children.

“Our position is that where these services are provided by very expert, multidisciplinary clinic services, such as a Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, we have to rely on the best clinical advice we have,” he said. “They have their own governance structures that look at look at those things.”

Professor Murphy said the federal government had no idea how many children were being prescribed puberty blockers, because data on the off-label use of drugs on the PBS was not collected.

“We wouldn‘t know for sure,” he said. “The drugs that are prescribed in a clinic, such as at the Royal Children’s Hospital, are normally prescribed through the hospital system, and we wouldn’t have access to that data,” he said.

In the wake of the decision by medical indemnity insurer MDA National to withdraw providing insurance cover to doctors in private practice prescribing cross-sex hormones to those under 18, the insurer’s president, Michael Gannon, said it was “keeping a very close eye on the evidence as to whether or not the effects of (puberty blockers) are reversible”.

“We think there are so many unknowns,” said Dr Gannon, a former president of the Australian Medical Association. “We came to an authentic view that there is likely to be significant claims from individuals through expressed regret years down the track about decisions they made when they were very young … there might be multimillion-dollar claims.”

Dr Gannon said doctors in clinical practice had “seen this complex social issue, complex set of considerations, turn from something that involves a very small number of people, to an issue of the questioning of personal identity being made by a sizeable minority of teens”.

Some members of state parliaments, such as Victorian Liberal Democrat David Limbrick, have also begun raising the issue with greater urgency in light of the shifting international evidence.

“With the changing view on what’s happening with gender medicine around the world, great caution needs to be taken around Australia,” he said. “If the TGA is not monitoring this, they should be. I definitely support some sort of review into gender medicine for children … If some children on puberty blockers are being treated inappropriately, it could lead to catastrophic, lifelong issues.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/health-leaders-reject-the-need-for-oversight-of-transgender-medicine/news-story/21d02c36677c20cc3320f891227f50d3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945864

File: 3be9bb5329debff⋯.jpg (376.88 KB,1920x1080,16:9,A_sketch_of_Malka_Leifer_i….jpg)

File: c444b3f2c93421a⋯.jpg (2.44 MB,4822x3215,4822:3215,Elisheva_Elly_Sapper_Hadas….jpg)

File: 25e1febbed7f21e⋯.jpg (2.84 MB,4968x3320,621:415,The_Adass_Israel_School_in….jpg)

Former Malka Leifer student settles abuse claim with ultra-Orthodox school

David Estcourt - May 30, 2023

A former student has settled a legal claim against Adass Israel School, the former employer of convicted rapist Malka Leifer, over new allegations of abuse connected to the ultra-Orthodox inner-Melbourne religious college.

The woman, a member of the ultra-Orthodox Adass community, filed a suit against Leifer and the Adass Israel School over fresh allegations of abuse. She settled the case on Tuesday morning, hours before the trial was due to begin.

The new claim comes just a month after Leifer faced a six-week trial in the County Court for abusing sisters Nicole Meyer, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper, with a jury finding she raped Erlich and Sapper. The jury cleared her of all charges brought by Meyer.

If heard, the new legal claim threatened to reopen the role of the school in hiring and failing to stop Leifer from abusing children for whom she had responsibility.

The settlement comes amid allegations that demonstrations were being planned by members of the ultra-Orthodox community unhappy with the new lawsuit. Screenshots seen by this masthead called on the community to come together and rally outside the woman’s house.

Sources close to the community say the protest did not go ahead.

Supreme Court justice Melinda Richards on Tuesday congratulated the parties on resolving the case, saying she appreciated “it was a difficult thing for both sides to do” and that the court “was very appreciative you’ve been able to reach that stance”.

Stephen McCredie, the barrister for the plaintiff known by the pseudonym Jamie Hart, said some elements of the claim still needed to be ironed out, but that settlement had occurred.

A trial in the County Court earlier this year heard that sisters Meyer, Erlich and Sapper, part of a small enclave of ultra-conservative Jewish families in Melbourne’s inner south-east, were abused between 2003 and 2007, while they were students.

Leifer was originally listed as a co-defendant in the fresh case but was removed after a default judgment had already been entered against her.

In a 2015 decision made after a civil case Erlich brought against the school, Supreme Court Justice Jack Rush said it was apparent that within a day of the school becoming aware of the allegations, it knew of “a further eight person’s [sic] affected by Mrs Leifer’s alleged misconduct” and awarded Erlich $1,024,428.

The jury found Leifer guilty of 18 rape and sexual assault charges and not guilty of nine. Leifer has always maintained her innocence.

The sisters have granted this masthead permission to use their names.

The former principal’s prosecution became an international scandal when she was rushed out of the country in the middle of the night in March 2008, after allegations of her sexual abuse against students began to mount. She would not return to Victoria to face justice for more than 10 years.

Last month, police confirmed to this masthead they had closed their investigation into members of the community who allegedly helped Leifer flee Australia and avoid justice for more than a decade.

Police said they had looked at a number of people connected to the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick, but the probe ended in 2018 because there was “insufficient evidence to proceed with any charges at this time”.

Questions have persisted in the past 15 years over the circumstances of Leifer’s quick escape to Israel when accusations of sexual abuse began to mount.

Leifer and members of her family escaped on the night of March 5, 2008, following a meeting that senior members of the Adass community convened to discuss allegations that Leifer had sexually assaulted the sisters, according to Supreme Court documents from Erlich’s civil case against Leifer and the school, heard in 2015.

Following the meeting, Leifer and people close to the board quickly booked plane tickets. Leifer and her family were on a flight to Israel at 1.20am, the documents say. She would remain beyond the reach of Victorian police for more than 10 years.

Rush, in his 2015 decision, also found “the timing of the booking of the tickets and departure of Leifer and members of her family … extraordinary”.

“The conduct demonstrates a disdain for due process of criminal investigation in this state,” he said.

Nobody has ever been charged for helping Leifer flee the jurisdiction.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/former-malka-leifer-student-settles-abuse-claim-with-ultra-orthodox-school-20230524-p5darc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945953

File: 1b77e8c703fadac⋯.jpg (4.12 MB,5165x3368,5165:3368,Victoria_Police_resume_pro….jpg)

File: 60bbed4fa222f8a⋯.jpg (578.97 KB,1240x1755,248:351,0001.jpg)

File: 7e2706643c726bf⋯.jpg (727.06 KB,1240x1755,248:351,0002.jpg)

File: a5e2881de10c0aa⋯.jpg (701.15 KB,1240x1755,248:351,0003.jpg)

File: 9d002324589ffd0⋯.jpg (296.66 KB,1240x1755,248:351,0004.jpg)

>>18945864

Police reopen probe into school board that allegedly helped Malka Leifer flee to Israel

Lachlan Abbott - June 3, 2023

1/2

Board members from an ultra-Orthodox Jewish school who in 2008 allegedly helped then-principal Malka Leifer flee Australia to Israel – where she for years avoided justice for sexually abusing students – are back under investigation, despite police previously ruling out charges.

Former Victorian premier Ted Baillieu, a prominent advocate for the three sisters who accused Leifer of abusing them at the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick where they were students, confirmed Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Shane Patton wrote to him on Friday to say police had resumed their investigation into the school’s board.

Police confirmed on Saturday that a sexual crimes squad investigation linked to a school in Elsternwick was ongoing.

In April, Leifer was found guilty of 18 charges, including rape and indecent assault, against sisters Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich. Leifer was found not guilty of charges relating to a third sister, Nicole Meyer. The three sisters have granted The Age permission to use their names.

After the verdict against Leifer, this masthead reported that police had closed an investigation into people connected to the school board, who allegedly helped Leifer catch a 1.20am flight to Israel after a meeting to discuss abuse allegations in March 2008. The police investigation was first shut down in 2018 because there was “insufficient evidence to proceed with any charges at this time”.

Baillieu and former Victorian trade minister Philip Dalidakis wrote to Patton in late April, urging him to further investigate school board’s role in Leifer’s departure, which led to a 15-year battle to extradite the former principal from Israel to convict her in the County Court.

Although both former politicians acknowledged Victoria Police’s “extraordinary work” to prosecute Leifer, the pair said they were stunned when after Leifer’s guilty verdict police initially said they wouldn’t investigate the school board.

“That announcement has been the source of enormous disappointment across the community,” the letter reads.

Patton’s response, obtained by The Age, says police suspended their school board investigation while separate criminal proceedings against Leifer were progressing, but it has now “re-commenced” the probe after the verdict.

“As criminal proceedings against Ms Leifer have been finalised, Crime Command has re-commenced their investigation into the Adass Israel School Board,” Patton wrote.

Erlich, one of Leifer’s victims, said she was encouraged that Victoria Police were re-examining the board’s actions.

“The actions of the board in facilitating Malka Leifer’s escape not only betrayed the pursuit of justice and caused significant delays, it also perpetuated the anguish we were forced to endure and hindered our path to healing,” she said.

“It is my hope that this process will bring a sense of closure to the other victims of Leifer, but also serves as a catalyst for change within the community and fosters an environment that supports reporting and preventing similar incidents in the future.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18945962

File: ce198e10b9a7eb5⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Ted_Baillieu_and_sisters_D….jpg)

>>18945953

2/2

Baillieu said on Saturday that he was “very pleased”.

“It was our view that we owed it to the victims, we owed it to the police – who have done such a good job – and we owed it to the wider community [to advocate for a school board investigation]. And we’re very pleased that it would seem we’ve had some success.”

Dalidakis, a former Victorian Labor upper house MP, welcomed the reinvestigation of the school board and said he recognised the difficult work involved in probing an incident that happened more than a decade ago.

“But certainly, it’s important both for the victims of the child sex-abuse case, and also important to demonstrate to people that assisted in Malka Leifer fleeing the country that there is no way that they can hide, that Victoria Police won’t be able to find them and hopefully, lay charges as well,” he said.

Leifer was extradited to Australia in January 2021, following a legal fight that took more than six years. She was charged in 2014.

The international scandal strained relations between Australia and Israel, led to the criminal prosecution of a senior Israeli parliamentarian, and required extraordinary undercover video to prove Leifer lied about having a mental illness, which prevented her extradition 10 times.

The Age also revealed Leifer was accused of further sexual abuse in her illegal ultra-Orthodox settlement in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

In 2015, the judge who heard Erlich’s civil suit against the Adass Israel School denounced the board’s conduct after documents revealed Leifer left Australia on March 5, 2008, after senior members of the Adass community convened to discuss allegations that she had sexually assaulted the sisters.

Following the meeting, Leifer and people close to the board quickly booked plane tickets.

A police spokesperson on Saturday said because the school investigation was ongoing “and given matters linked to this remain before the court, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time”.

Leifer is awaiting sentencing for the sexual assault charges.

Another former Leifer student settled an abuse claim against the Adass Israel School last Tuesday over new allegations against the former principal.

The Sunday Age has contacted the school and will seek further comment from representatives on Saturday night after the Sabbath ends.

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/police-reopen-probe-into-school-board-that-allegedly-helped-malka-leifer-flee-to-israel-20230602-p5ddbh.html

https://www.smh.com.au/interactive/hub/media/tearout-excerpt/17211/230430-Mr-Shane-Patton-APM-Commissioner-of-Police_Redacted.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18946058

File: 43746e9e3c38d8e⋯.mp4 (15.71 MB,800x450,16:9,349120856_3455777628070494….mp4)

File: becad74aeee0ade⋯.jpg (275.7 KB,1429x1429,1:1,348976529_781439093426953_….jpg)

Talisman Sabre Facebook Post

25 May 2023

The countdown is on for Talisman Sabre 2023

The largest bilateral military training activity between #YourADF and the United States is set to take place from 22 July – 4 August in Queensland.

This year’s exercise will be the biggest yet in terms of geographical spread and number of partner nations participating.

Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany and Indonesia will all take part and contribute to the exercise’s outcomes.

Read more - https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2023-05-15/planning-key-success-talisman-sabre

#TalismanSabre2023

https://www.facebook.com/100064439989363/videos/199397106322476

https://www.defence.gov.au/exercises/talisman-sabre

>Talisman Sabre

>MAGIC SWORD

https://qanon.pub/?q=Operation%20Specialists

https://qanon.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18949802

File: 33588b9ed58405b⋯.jpg (94.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_leader_Noel_Pea….jpg)

File: 69c79c0378d8749⋯.jpg (86.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18900665 (pb)

‘Duplicitous’: Noel Pearson accuses Peter Dutton over race argument on voice

SARAH ISON - JUNE 4, 2023

Prominent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has accused Peter Dutton of being “duplicitous” in raising concern that enshrining the Indigenous voice to parliament in the Constitution would “re-racialise the nation”, claiming the Opposition Leader assured him earlier this year he would be not making arguments on the basis of race.

Mr Pearson also revealed he did not see himself serving as a member of the voice amid speculation over who would be elected to the body, which will advise the parliament and executive government.

“I’ve been working very hard to set up a system for the future. (There are) so many talented young leaders coming behind us, they’re the ones who are going to make this system work,” he told Sky News.

It follows the legislation that will set up the referendum to enshrine the voice in the Constitution passing the lower house this week, with Anthony Albanese ruling out changes to the wording before parliament.

Mr Dutton used his speech on the bill to argue the voice would divide and “re-racialise” Australia.

“It will have an Orwellian effect where all Australians are equal, but some Australians are more equal than others,” he told the House of the Representatives last week.

But Mr Pearson said the Opposition Leader’s speech contradicted what Mr Dutton told him during private meetings.

“The disappointing thing about the position taken by Peter Dutton is that I met with him two or three times with Julian Leeser, this was when Julian was the spokesman for Aboriginal Affairs, and at those meetings Peter was very, very clear in what he said to me, he said ‘I do not agree with the race argument. Don’t take me to be making a race argument’,” Mr Pearson said.

“He assured me that he did not take the voice to be racial proposition. But of course, since Julian’s left the spokesperson role, (Mr Dutton) has come back to make this completely dishonest argument about re-racialising the Constitution.

“That is not the position Peter took to me when Julian Leeser was in the room, he was very anxious to assure me in fact that he wasn’t making that argument. I think he’s being a bit duplicitous now in talking about re-racialising the Constitution.”

Mr Dutton’s office was contacted for comment on Mr Pearson’s claims.

It follows Mr Pearson last month accusing Indigenous leader Mick Gooda of being a “bed wetter” for voicing his concerns about the proposal and the legal challenges presented by the inclusion of executive government.

While the legislation has passed the lower house, it must still pass the senate later this month, where it is expected arguments will be made again by the Coalition about the risks posed by including reference to executive government in the constitutional amendment.

But Mr Pearson said it was crucial executive government remain in the amendment and argued the current proposal gave parliament the power to “define how the advice is provided to the executive”.

“It’s important that we get the executive in the scope because that’s a day-to-day business,” he said.

“There was a tweak done by Albanese and my Indigenous colleagues, they tweaked the provision just before it was tabled in the parliament to make it very clear that parliament can legislate to define how the advice is provided to the executive.”

Mr Pearson said the parliament also would have the power to completely overhaul the body and replace it with something else, should the original model not work as intended.

“(The constitutional amendment) gives complete power to our elected representatives in Canberra to decide what the voice looks like. And if next year, they want to change it slightly, they can pass legislation to change it. If they want to replace it with a totally different structure, they will have the power to do that,” he said.

“So everything lies in the hands of the parliament.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/duplicitous-noel-pearson-accuses-peter-dutton-over-race-argument-on-voice/news-story/d85a84775b94c375e0447f0fd8f4a1a2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18949819

File: 463c9f1fde4f38d⋯.jpg (96.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_deliverin….jpg)

File: 6ab82d9f3a7652f⋯.jpg (97.36 KB,768x1024,3:4,Pat_Anderson_and_Megan_Dav….jpg)

>>18928670

Moral high ground in Indigenous voice to parliament debate has been hijacked by perceived ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ vote

DENNIS SHANAHAN - JUNE 3, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese “called out the great lie” this week at the centre of the No campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government that a successful referendum will put race into the Constitution.

“This great lie will sit at the centre of the No campaign and needs to be called out,” the Prime Minister declared during his Lowitja O’Donaghue Oration in Adelaide, kicking off the formal Yes campaign and preparing for the parliamentary passage of the referendum legislation.

“Yes, there are scare campaigns. But what those campaigns have in common is that they underestimate Australians so radically.”

Albanese is right to say existing sections of the Constitution contain racial references, but his railing against lies, misinformation, disinformation, illogical argument and false assumptions is a case of the Yes campaign pot calling the No campaign a black kettle.

At the beginning of this six-month argument it is worth assessing the state of the debate so far and, as Albanese demands, calling out some of that misinformation, disinformation, lack of information and twisted sophistry that demean the debate and the Australian people.

The first grand act of demagoguery in the voice debate is to declare there is a right and there is a wrong vote in the referendum – it is an insidious hijacking of the moral high ground where to vote No is not only wrong but also racist and unfair.

When Australians exercise their democratic vote at the ballot box there is no right or wrong vote, there is the result of a democratic process.

A competitive vote will have winners and losers who will be pleased or aggrieved, but we do not live in a tyranny of the majority, nor should we punish, disrespect or ostracise those who have “lost” or supported the losing side.

Yet from Albanese’s exhortation on Monday to ensure “together as a nation” we can get it “right” as we did in 1967, to Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney’s expectation of a “successful referendum” after the House of Representatives passed the referendum bill, to Uncle Karl Winda Telfer at Adelaide Oval on Wednesday night, ahead of the State of Origin rugby league match between Queensland and NSW, that “we’re mature enough to make the right call”, the message is that there is a right vote – Yes – and those voting No are wrong.

Speaking of the record vote on the 1967 referendum on including Aboriginal people in the census, Albanese said on Monday: “It was about what was right. That’s what resonated within us then. That’s what precisely drives us still.”

To label the Yes or No case as right or wrong is to convert people’s votes into moral judgments carrying a weight of guilt that should not attach to the free exercise of our democratic right on such a complex issue with ramifications across the federal government. There is also a conundrum in the heart of the debate about whether the voice will be modest or radical; practical or symbolic; and all-encompassing or restricted to issues affecting Indigenous people only.

The difficulty for Albanese and voice supporters is that they are maintaining all points simultaneously despite the inherent contradictions.

From the beginning Albanese has described the voice as a “gracious and modest request” and sought to play down the extent of the impact of the voice on areas such as the environment, foreign policy or taxation. He argues the vast majority of Australians will be unaffected, that the voice will be limited to issues such as education and health, and he trivialises objections by dismissing claims the voice will affect “parking tickets”.

But those wanting more radical action and Indigenous leaders who will brook no restrictions on the voice contradict Albanese, feeding the argument that this is a comprehensive constitutional change with wide-ranging effects.

After the Prime Minister tried to limit the voice, leading Indigenous working group member and law professor Megan Davis told The Australian: “The voice will be able to speak to all parts of the government, including the cabinet, ministers, public servants and independent statutory offices and agencies – such as the Reserve Bank” and declared the voice could not be shut up. Fellow working group member Noel Pearson has said that being able to have influence on all areas of government is at “the guts” of the voice.

While Albanese sought to reassure middle Australia there was no threat to day-to-day government, the voice advocates repudiated him and others sought even more radical agendas for treaties and sovereignty.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18949821

File: 45865e85d096225⋯.jpg (151.57 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>18949819

2/2

On Monday, Albanese shifted his language and concluded his big speech with an emotional: “So let us not content ourselves with modest change. Let us not fill our hearts with the empty warmth of the merely symbolic.” This could have been a reaction to a sympathetic audience although he has not repeated “modest” since and on Thursday there was a hint from Don Farrell, as Special Minister of State, as to why there could have been a shift to less modest and more radical language.

Farrell told the National Press Club he thought “it will be young people who deliver the referendum”. This could be significant because Newspoll figures from earlier in the year, as the decline in support for the voice began, showed the biggest fall in support was among young people and Greens supporters.

As Farrell noted, the older cohorts are likelier to oppose the voice. It is also clear that the big shift lately against the voice is Coalition voters who were “softly” supporting the voice but now are shifting to strong opposition.

So, Albanese is caught between appealing to lost younger voters who want more radical action by dropping “modest” and reclaiming lost older voters by citing long-term conservative support for recognition from Harold Holt in 1967 to John Howard in 2007 and former Liberal frontbencher Julian Leeser today.

The other great hesitancy about the voice is among people who believe it will not fix the dire issues facing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. While trying not to flame fears of overreach into government, Albanese has been ramping the voice as a means to ending all of the ills facing Indigenous Australians, ranging from shorter life spans and higher incarceration rates to poverty.

“We aspire to reach high for the symbolic ideal. But the ideal lacks meaning unless we commit to the concrete practical actions that will actually improve people’s lives. This referendum gives us the tools to do both,” he said.

“A change that inspires hope about a better future, and then has the means to make that better future real, substantive, and tangible. Constitutional recognition is the ‘what’. The voice to parliament and government is the ‘how’.”

So the voice is an inspired means to an end and that end is to finally address the sorry plight of Indigenous Australians that has not been addressed for 120 years and after spending more than $30bn a year nationally.

Here is another trap in the debate where the voice is seen as a silver bullet that will solve all these problems. Albanese alluded to this danger of giving yourself a “pat on the back” and consider the job done when the referendum passes while trying to expound the great practical advantages of the voice.

What’s more, this is tied to the reasonable demands from people outside the political parties attending forums around the country who want more information about how the voice will work. Too much of the response from the government for requests for more information are dismissed as trivial demands from “Chicken Littles”.

Instead, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and Burney focus on the process that has passed to legitimise the referendum as being representative and not a “flight of fancy” conceived in haste.

The Indigenous Australians Minister even suggested this week some DIY with a 15-minute search of government websites to see what the voice would be.

Former prime minister and No campaigner Tony Abbott said the government was constantly claiming that there was a superabundance of detail about the voice proposal.

“Well, plenty of words have been written, but there is no specificity about any of it. And if you actually go on to the government’s supposed information site, everything is to be done after the event. I mean, we still don’t know how members of the voice would be chosen,” he told the Institute of Public Affairs.

Of course, the next six months, with the referendum vote probably falling the week after the rugby league and Australian rules grand finals – Albanese has said several times a constitutional change won’t interfere with the footy finals – is likely to continue in the fog unless the government deals with the inherent contradictions by presenting more argument and less emotion.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/hijacking-the-moral-high-ground-in-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-debate/news-story/0091cf783c99918acd84e4f073502e06

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18949840

File: 471b1c3b7dcdc0b⋯.jpg (3.49 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Liberals_for_Yes_members_R….jpg)

>>18928670

It’s OK to vote Yes: Meet the Liberals campaigning for the Voice

Jacqueline Maley - June 4, 2023

Kate Carnell wants Liberals, Liberal voters and Liberal-curious people to know one thing: it’s OK to vote Yes.

The former Liberal ACT chief minister and Small Business Ombudsman is the head of the Liberals For Yes campaign, which launches today with its own merchandise and website.

Alarmed by the race-based rhetoric used by some No campaigners, and with a strong belief in the positive value of the Voice, Liberals For Yes will target “soft No” voters who incline towards conservative or Liberal values but could be persuaded to support the constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians.

“We are aiming our campaign at, not just at Liberal party members, but people who traditionally vote Liberal,” Carnell said.

“We want to empower them. Just because federally the party is taking a different tack, doesn’t mean you can’t vote Yes.”

Carnell is joined in the campaign by a roll-call of about 20 current and former Liberal parliamentarians, including former Liberal premier of NSW Mike Baird, Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockcliff, federal backbenchers Julian Leeser and Bridget Archer, ACT Liberal Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee, former senator Gary Humphries and NSW Member for Manly James Griffin.

Two senior Liberal hard-heads – John Howard’s former chief of staff Tony Nutt, and the Liberal party’s pollster Mark Textor – already sit on the board of the Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition, the fundraising body for the larger Yes23 campaign.

Their advocacy for the Voice to parliament stands in direct contrast to the views of federal Liberal leader Peter Dutton, who has said the Voice will “re-racialise” Australia, and “take our country backwards not forwards”, language which many pro-Yes Liberals have found alarming.

He has announced the federal Liberal Party will actively campaign for the “No” case, which dismayed many moderates and led to the decision by former Indigenous Affairs spokesman Julian Leeser to quit the front bench.

Leeser said he welcomes the establishment of the Liberals For Yes campaign.

“I want to see as many Liberals as possible campaigning for the Yes vote.”

Carnell said the federal parliamentary party had “taken a different view to state colleagues and others”.

“I believe there are many, many Libs out there who want to vote yes, and our job is to dispel some of the myths and arm them with information.”

Former NSW premier Mike Baird said the Liberals For Yes pitch was a practical one.

“As a former senior lawmaker, on reflection, I think any additional consultation or input into legislation for our First Nations people would be incredibly helpful”.

“As I look back, yes, I consulted, yes, I had advice, but I don’t think I had anything like what was required to have more of an impact.”

Liberal MP for Manly James Griffin said he had experience being advised by the NSW Heritage Council when he served as Heritage Minister.

“No one ever complained to me about this unelected body providing advice to the minister.”

“In fact, their expertise was seen as useful. It enhanced policy.”

Griffin supports the Voice for reasons of patriotism and equality.

“If you are a patriot and concerned about our country and wanting it to be the best it can be, then moving forward is something you should support.”

Carnell has worked as a lobbyist as CEO of Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, as CEO of the Australian Food and Grocery Council and as a director of Beyond Blue.

“[Lobbyists] talk to executive government all the time about policies we want … we advocate for things we care about to executive government.”

She said the Voice to parliament is giving that same right to Indigenous people.

“It’s not a huge change, but it’s something that needs to happen, and it’s not scary.”

Baird said he hoped to see constructive debate.

“A real debate and people are open to other people having different opinions and undertaking their own research.”

“We have to respect all opinions in it.”

Canberra entrepreneur, martial arts teacher and local Liberal party member Tom Adam will volunteer for the Liberals For Yes campaign.

“This will give people a voice they don’t have to fight for. It gives representation,” he says.

“If we find out where the gaps of knowledge and information are, and point people in the right direction, I think the arguments against it can be resolved.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/it-s-okay-to-vote-yes-meet-the-liberals-campaigning-for-the-voice-20230603-p5ddn4.html

https://liberalsforyes.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18949874

File: 8a15c875db51dfc⋯.jpg (3.92 MB,7237x4825,7237:4825,Chinese_Defence_Minister_L….jpg)

File: 3871c69dbf99dd9⋯.jpg (6.29 MB,8135x5423,8135:5423,Chinese_Defense_Minister_G….jpg)

>>18945189

>>18945286

Chinese general threatens foreign navies after warships nearly collide in Taiwan Strait

Eryk Bagshaw - June 4, 2023

1/2

Singapore: China’s defence minister has warned foreign naval vessels and warplanes to stay out of the Taiwan Strait, intensifying Beijing’s military posture a day after a Chinese warship nearly collided with an American destroyer in the contested waters.

The Australian government responded with alarm to the incident on Sunday, warning that a miscalculation could have devastating consequences. “An accident in that context would be a disaster,” said Defence Minister Richard Marles, who met with Beijing’s defence minister Li Shangfu on Saturday night and urged him to keep lines of communication open.

But in a strident speech on Sunday that escalated China’s threats towards the democratic island of Taiwan, Li told other countries to “mind their own business”.

“As the lyrics of a well-known Chinese song go when friends visit us, we welcome them with fine wine, when jackals or wolves come, we will face them with shotguns,” he said.

On Saturday, a Chinese warship came within 140 metres of hitting the American destroyer USS Chung-Hoon in the Taiwan Strait. Canadian reporters travelling aboard the trailing HMCS Montreal witnessed the Chinese navy ship pick up considerable speed and cut in front of the bow of the Chung-Hoon.

The near miss followed another incident between the world’s two largest militaries on May 26 when a Chinese fighter jet swerved in front of a US reconnaissance aircraft over the South China Sea.

“They’re not here for innocent passage,” said Li. “They’re here for provocation.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the incident was a concern. “I spoke there about a misadventure or a miscalculation having consequences,” he said in Vietnam after leaving Singapore on Saturday.

Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, international ships and planes are allowed to pass through the Taiwan Strait if they are outside a 24-nautical mile zone from any coastline.

“Why did all those incidents happen in areas near China not in areas near other countries?” Li asked in response to questions at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore.

“I think that is because China’s naval vessels or Chinese fighter jets do not do those navigation actions in areas near other countries.”

But other areas do not face weekly military threats from Beijing. On Sunday morning alone, 15 People’s Liberation Army aircraft and seven naval vessels were detected around Taiwan by its Ministry of National Defence.

China claims neighbouring Taiwan as a province of the mainland despite the Chinese Communist Party never having ruled the democratic island of 24 million people. President Xi Jinping has set a target of unifying with Taiwan by the centenary of the People’s Republic in 2049, but some military leaders fear that could come much earlier as China rapidly builds up its military capability.

“We will strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification with our most sincerity and greatest efforts,” said Li. “But we make no promise to renounce the use of force if anyone dares to separate Taiwan from China.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18949876

File: 03c49817009ce5d⋯.jpg (2.82 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Taiwan_s_President_Tsai_In….jpg)

File: 2144ce221738e62⋯.jpg (2.07 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

>>18949874

2/2

Less than 8 per cent of the Taiwanese population wants to see unification with the mainland, according to a regular poll by Taipei’s National Chengchi University. But Li accused, without evidence, Taiwan’s ruling Democratic People’s Party of “manipulating and hijacking public opinion”.

“They have tried hard to erase the Chinese identity of Taiwan,” he said. “Meanwhile, some big power has repeatedly sold arms to Taiwan, providing military training assistance to it and upgraded official exchanges with Taiwan.”

Li accused the United States of attempting to contain China by supporting Taiwan. The Chinese general has refused to meet with his counterpart Lloyd Austin at the Shangri-La in Singapore, historically one of only two bilaterals between the two military leaders each year. Li was sanctioned by the US in 2018 over the purchase of Russian fighter jets.

In his keynote speech at the Shangri-La Albanese urged the two superpowers to re-open dialogue after a communication breakdown following the shooting down of a Chinese-made balloon over the US in February.

Austin on Saturday said he was deeply concerned that China has been unwilling to engage more seriously on better mechanisms for crisis management between the two militaries.

“For responsible defence leaders, the right time to talk is any time. The right time to talk is every time and the right time to talk is now,” said Austin.

Li said it was undeniable that a severe confrontation between China and the US will “be an unbearable disaster for the world”.

“China seeks to develop a new type of major country relationship with the United States,” he said.

Despite the deepening rift between the two superpowers, Marles said on Sunday his meeting with Li was positive. “General Li and I both agreed that we had walked a significant journey over the course of the last 12 months,” he said.

Marles raised the cases of detained Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun with Li and other human rights issues in their 40-minute meeting with Li.

“Now, there is a whole range of issues, that we continue to work through with China,” he said. “It’s precisely when things are not all agreed that you need to have diplomacy to navigate those borders”.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/chinese-general-threatens-foreign-navies-after-warships-nearly-collide-in-taiwan-strait-20230604-p5dds0.html

https://twitter.com/ianellisjones/status/1665016417412960258

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18949887

File: 41c0a08570b4b57⋯.jpg (219.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Australian_Defence_Ministe….jpg)

>>18945189

>>18949874

Richard Marles ‘haunted’ by prospect of US, China war in Indo-Pacific

WILL GLASGOW - JUNE 4, 2023

Richard Marles says he is “haunted” by whether Russia’s war in Ukraine is a “forewarning of the contest to come” as China challenges America’s global dominance.

Australia’s Defence Minister told Singapore’s Shangri-La security conference on Sunday that Vladimir Putin’s invasion – launched months before the election of the Albanese government – had raised the prospect of war in the Indo-Pacific.

“The question that haunted me then – and still does a year on – is whether the war in Ukraine is a ‘terminal spasm of Europe’s imperial past’, as one astute commentator noted, or a forewarning of the contest to come in a post-hegemonic world.

“Where states see opportunity to build a new order according to their preferences – including, if necessary, by military aggression,” Mr Marles said in a speech.

“Putin clearly saw such an opportunity and determined he would seize it.

“Australia believes it is vitally important for our collective future that the world concludes from Ukraine’s inspiring resistance that Putin’s gambit failed, and that the costs of military aggression far outweighed any perceived benefit.”

The Australian Defence Minister spoke hours after his Chinese counterpart Li Shangfu told the same forum that, while Beijing preferred “peaceful unification” with Taiwan, China would never “promise to renounce the use of force” against the self-governed liberal democracy.

Minister Li, a general and since March the international face of the People’s Liberation Army, also took a swipe at the US and its AUKUS security partnership with Australia and the UK, along with denouncing “block confrontation” and “Cold War mentality”, phrases used to describe America’s alliance network.

In response to widespread concerns about reckless behaviour by the PLA in the South China China Sea, East China Sea and Taiwan Strait, China’s military chief said that other countries should “mind your own business”.

Mr Marles and an Australian delegation that included his department secretary Greg Moriarty and General Angus Campbell, chief of the Defence Force, had a bilateral meeting on Saturday with Minister Li. Beijing denied Washington’s requests to arrange a similar meeting with America’s Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin.

Australia and China have also recommenced their defence dialogue, one of many channels Beijing froze during its unhappiness with the Turnbull and Morrison governments.

“These are important steps forward and we acknowledge that these are steps which China and Australia have taken together,” Mr Marles said on Sunday.

“But it is also important that transparency in strategic intent and the purpose of military growth characterise the way nations operate in the Indo-Pacific and for that matter the world.”

Australia’s Defence Minister said, a year after he raised his concerns about the opacity with which China was conducting “the largest conventional military build-up the world has seen since the Second World War”, Beijing had still not provided “our region or the world with any strategic reassurance” about its intent.

He rejected Beijing complaints, repeated on Sunday morning by Minister Li, that Australia’s AUKUS defence technology agreement or Quad grouping with America, Japan and India were creating regional instability.

“Some would seek to frame groupings like AUKUS and the Quad as ‘blocism’, which somehow diminish ASEAN.

“To the contrary, they show how small groups of countries can work together in support of the principles and objectives we all hold so dear.”

Mr Marles said, in contrast to China, Australia’s government was committed to being “as transparent as possible” about its defence strategy, pointing to the more than 60 calls made to regional and other world leaders explaining the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine deal.

But he said, even as Australia upgrades the country’s military capabilities, diplomacy would remain at the “front line” of Canberra’s engagement with the world.

“Diplomacy is not measured by the volume with which friends agree. Rather its measure is in how tensions are navigated. Substantive discussion always matters.

“And we will always seek to use diplomacy to create pathways for peace.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/richard-marles-haunted-by-prospect-of-us-china-war-in-indopacific/news-story/ddfa350f48abe3bff6d8d9a50b7e4976

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18949906

File: 597b300ae038169⋯.jpg (276.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,President_of_Ukraine_Volod….jpg)

File: 8e1ce36f0e0f93e⋯.jpg (865.5 KB,825x1799,825:1799,OR_1.jpg)

File: d6c81454dff9c87⋯.jpg (226.7 KB,1200x1600,3:4,Fxn2UVPWAAAO_m8.jpg)

>>18676820 (pb)

>>18714027 (pb)

>>18855354 (pb)

Kyiv ‘needs to wait’ for fresh support, says Anthony Albanese

BEN PACKHAM - JUNE 4, 2023

Anthony Albanese has pushed back at Ukraine’s suggestion his government is preparing to unveil fresh support for Ukraine next month, saying announcements would be made “when they’re ready to be made”.

“My governments is a considered, adult government,” the Prime Minister told reporters on Saturday during a visit to Vietnam.

“I can confirm that we make the announcements when they are ready, when they’ve been considered by all of our processes, including our cabinet.”

The comments followed a tweet by Ukraine’s Defence Oleksii Reznikov after a meeting with Australian counterpart Richard Marles in Singapore, declaring: “Another package of security assistance will be announced by the (Australian) government in July.”

The tweet came amid speculation that Mr Albanese will announce fresh support for Kyiv when he attends the July 11-12 NATO conference in Lithuania.

As Ukraine pushes its Western partners to supply F-16 fighter jets to gain the upper hand against Russia, Mr Reznikov said he had asked Australia to consider training Ukrainian pilots.

He said the country was also hoping for Australia to provide medical evacuation vehicles and electronic warfare weapons to bring down enemy drones.

Mr Albanese, who also met with Mr Reznikov at Singapore’s Shangri-La Dialogue, said Australia would continue to monitor the situation “and to deliver what we can when we can”.

The Prime Minister asserted, erroneously, Australia was the largest non-NATO contributor of assistance. Support from Japan and Sweden surpassed Australia’s long ago.

Mr Albanese said Australia would continue to deliver promised Bushmaster protected mobility vehicles to Ukraine, after revelations in senate estimates this week that not all of the pledged 90 vehicles had arrived in the country.

But he was tight lipped on the prospect of Australia donating new Hawkei protected mobility vehicles to the country’s war effort.

Mr Marles said it was “an honour” to meet Mr Reznikov in person.

“Australia condemns Russia’s illegal and immoral invasion Ukraine,” he tweeted.

“We continue to work with our partners to empower Ukraine to resolve this conflict on its own terms. We will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.”

Their meeting follows a concerted campaign by Kyiv for Australia to donate up to 90 Hawkeis, which it wants to use as mobile anti-aircraft platforms.

Defence officials told Senate Estimates during the week that Australia would be unable to sustain the vehicles because of a shortage of spare parts.

They also highlighted an anti-lock braking fault that does not affect the vehicles’ off-road performance.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/kyiv-needs-to-wait-for-fresh-support-says-anthony-albanese/news-story/779d21344e41a589fe6eed9c27cc2143

https://twitter.com/oleksiireznikov/status/1664632375135936517

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18954987

File: 85080b1d762f679⋯.mp4 (15.47 MB,640x360,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_was_recorde….mp4)

File: 5dce0ab727c4e6e⋯.jpg (324.9 KB,2048x1537,2048:1537,Brittany_Higgins_with_Lisa….jpg)

File: 143177a3520e505⋯.jpg (119.43 KB,1024x768,4:3,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18928680

Wilkinson, Higgins war-gamed ‘friendlies’

Brittany Higgins and Lisa Wilkinson brainstormed MPs who would ‘fire questions’ in QT over the alleged sexual assault, highlighting Anthony Albanese and Tanya Plibersek.

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - June 4, 2023

1/3

Brittany Higgins and Lisa Wilkinson war-gamed how to recruit prominent politicians and media figures who could help give ­momentum to their upcoming ­interview on The Project, as the TV host made suggestions to the former Liberal staffer about how to frame her story.

The more than five-hour session, which also involved Ms Higgins’ boyfriend David Sharaz and Wilkinson’s producer Angus Llewellyn, was recorded on January 27, 2021 a few days before they filmed the interview that was broadcast on February 15 revealing Ms Higgins’ claims she had been raped in Parliament House.

The group brainstormed MPs who would “fire questions” in question time over the alleged sexual assault, highlighting Labor leaders Anthony Albanese and Tanya Plibersek as key players, with Wilkinson highly critical of former foreign minister Julie Bishop for refusing to “speak out” against the poor culture of Parliament House.

The recording revelations came as Bruce Lehrmann accused Ms Higgins of lying about being raped to save her job, and for the first time revealed how her sexual assault allegation forced him to contemplate jumping in front of a train to kill himself.

In an interview with the Seven Network, Mr Lehrmann said Ms Higgins intentionally told their shared chief of staff Fiona Brown the “white lie” that he had raped her to preserve her employment, after seeing him get sacked.

Ms Higgins told Wilkinson that she could find some “friendly MPs” who could fire questions in question time. Wilkinson suggested Mr Albanese could be helpful, before backtracking and describing him as “a bit of a dead duck at the moment”.

“Well, he’s in a car crash, leave him alone,” Mr Sharaz responded. “He got a lot of coverage out of that.”

Wilkinson then suggested “Tanya Plibersek, definitely”, to which Mr Sharaz said: “Yeah”.

Ms Higgins tells the group: “We’re doing a parliamentary showcase before all this starts. So it’s going to be great, we’re ­having fun.”

The revelations come as CCTV images of Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann arriving at Parliament House were aired for the first time.

In the hours-long pre-session, Wilkinson said Ms Higgins would have to consider how to answer questions on why she did not go to the police with her allegations.

The Channel Ten host also told the former staffer that she did not want “to put words in your mouth” but asked if Ms Higgins “could enunciate” how the culture at Parliament House could allow a rape to occur without anyone being punished.

“I have every confidence that you will answer that very eloquently, but it’s one you just need to really think about,” Wilkinson said.

“I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but if you can enunciate the fact that this place is all about suppression of people’s natural sense of justice.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18954994

File: 88c49c145b99fbf⋯.mp4 (14.42 MB,640x360,16:9,Bombshell_CCTV_of_Brittany….mp4)

File: 55f6ee14d91fe0f⋯.jpg (91.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_and_Brittan….jpg)

File: 65a85de7beb244f⋯.jpg (77.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ms_Higgins_after_passing_t….jpg)

File: 17ffb7cd88b0c07⋯.jpg (157.24 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_with_her_….jpg)

>>18954987

2/3

Ms Higgins in the recording also said she thought she could win against Mr Lehrmann in a civil suit if he sued, but that she was unsure her allegations could be proved “beyond reasonable doubt” in a criminal trial.

“If he wants to go me after, like on a civil basis, I think, on the balance of probabilities, I think I could win. I think it’s, if the onus of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt, I think that would be different. I don’t think I could win that,” Ms Higgins said.

A small part of the session was played to the court during Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial, in which it was revealed that Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz had proposed breaking the story in a parliamentary sitting week so that “they have to answer questions at question time, it’s a mess for them”.

Ms Higgins said it would mean “they’re all stuck in Parliament House with it”.

Mr Sharaz told the group: “I’ve got a friend in Labor, Katy Gallagher on the Labor side, who will probe and continue it going.”

Cross-examined on the conversation during the trial, Ms Higgins told the court: “That wasn’t the actual interview itself and I didn’t sign a stat dec on this. This is just us talking.”

Wilkinson lambasted Julia ­Bishop for waiting until after she left parliament to flag the sexist nature of parliament, rather than speaking up while she was in the role. “The biggest frustration that I have with Julie is that she had so many opportunities to speak out against the culture,” Wilkinson said. “And for one woman to, what was she, deputy to 13 different prime ministers over the course of her time in parliament.”

Mr Sharaz interjected, saying: “Always loyal too. Bridesmaid, never the bride.”

To which Wilkinson said: “The minute she was out of there (she said) ‘oh it’s really sexist’. I tried to get her on the record with that so many times when she could’ve actually affected change, and she wouldn’t.”

When questioning whether Ms Bishop would be willing to speak out against Parliament House culture, Ms Wilkinson suggested she might refuse due to her ties to Michaelia Cash and Linda Reynolds.

“They‘re all Perth girls,” she said. However, Ms Higgins said “they were never friends”.

“I don‘t know why, but they never liked each other,” Ms Higgins said.

Mr Sharaz added: “Julie doesn’t have any friends.”

Mr Sharaz then suggested getting sexual assault survivor and advocate Grace Tame to do media the next day.

The group also discussed whether former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull would help.

Male voice: “He does hate (Scott) Morrison. Does he hate him that much?”

Wilkinson: “Yeah, I think so. Malcolm, I know Malcolm well. I reckon Malcolm will talk.”

The group also discuss Senator Reynolds, who Ms Higgins claimed had not been supportive after the alleged assault. (Senator Reynolds and her then chief of staff say Ms Higgins didn’t tell them about the alleged assault).

At one point Wilkinson refers to Senator Reynolds as “an idiot”. When Ms Higgins’ says Senator Reynolds doesn’t “super care about my mental health”, Mr Sharaz says sarcastically: “No, Linda cares”, at which laughter is heard on the tape.

Wilkinson: “I’ve so got her [Linda] in my sights now. Now that I’ve refreshed my memory on that.

Mr Sharaz: “I said to Britt, ultimately, what do you want out of this? She goes, well, I want Bruce to forever have it difficult getting a job, like it’s going to be difficult for me.”

Wilkinson: “Yeah.”

Mr Sharaz: “And then you said, best-case scenario, Linda ­Reynolds.”

Ms Higgins: “I was just ­reaching!”

At another point in the session Ms Wilkinson told the group: “I’m a great believer in people’s time will come. I’m incredibly ­patient.”

Mr Sharaz interjects: “Linda’s time, please, god, let it be Linda’s time.”

Wilkinson: “Well, I think it might be.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955004

File: 069cce3d7df5f76⋯.mp4 (6.85 MB,640x360,16:9,Bruce_Lerhmann_speaks_Deni….mp4)

File: 968aec93f2831a0⋯.jpg (74.15 KB,768x1024,3:4,Malcolm_Turnbull.jpg)

File: d70d17fc4b9bd19⋯.jpg (95.22 KB,768x1024,3:4,Grace_Tame.jpg)

>>18954994

3/3

Mr Sharaz said Mr Lehrmann would be “shitting himself” when The Project interview was released, as Ms Higgins celebrated the fact the former Liberal staffer would never be able to run for politics.

The Project team elected not to name Mr Lehrmann in the interview, but Ms Higgins said “that‘s all right” because people within the party would be able to put ”two and two” together, which would prevent him from ever running for politics. “He was fired at the time, he was in that office, they’ll know and that’s what matters,” she said. ”He would never get a preselection now.”

Mr Sharaz added: “And he’ll be shitting himself when it comes out.”

Ms Higgins described Mr Lehrmann as “one of those … legacy ones” who would inevitably run for a federal seat.

“If enough people can put two and two together, it’ll stop him from getting preselected for the seat of Wentworth or something, one day,” she said.

After Ms Higgins flagged concerns she may be bullied by former prime ministerial staffers Yaron Finkelstein and Andrew Carswell, along with members of Senator Cash’s office, Wilkinson said: “You know your best response, if they want to try and bully you?”

Ms Higgins: “Hm?”

Wilkinson: “Just look them in the eye, and say, I was raped in a minister’s office.”

Ms Higgins likened Mr Finkelstein to the ruthless House of Cards character played by Kevin Spacey. “I’d liken Yaron to like, Frank Underwood from House of Cards,” she said. “He is like, he’s the PMO fixer. He is that guy.”

At one point in the session Ms Higgins says that when she resigns from her job she won’t be seeking a payout. “I’m not pressing, I don’t want money. I’m not going after them with a lawyer for anything. I don’t want anything. I’m not fired, I’m not a disgruntled employee, I’m quitting.”

Ms Higgins later took action against the Commonwealth and is believed to have settled for an amount in excess of $2m.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/how-lisa-wilkinson-and-brittany-higgins-wargamed-which-friendlies-to-fire-up/news-story/2d2688a45ff7254336da64ef43617c7a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955007

File: 7f749746c064512⋯.jpg (120.59 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_s_interview….jpg)

File: bc3da8e1c112b22⋯.jpg (133.11 KB,862x862,1:1,Mr_Lehrmann_claims_to_have….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Bruce Lehrmann says he hasn't ruled out suing Brittany Higgins for defamation in first TV interview since being accused of rape

Patrick Bell - 5 June 2023

1/2

Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann says he has not ruled out suing Brittany Higgins personally for defamation.

Mr Lehrmann made the comments in his first television interview since Ms Higgins accused him of raping her at Parliament House in 2019.

Mr Lehrmann's trial was abandoned due to juror misconduct last year. There are no findings against him.

Speaking to 7NEWS Spotlight, Mr Lehrmann strenuously denied raping Ms Higgins but acknowledged that many people did not believe him.

"I accept that there's going to be 50 per cent of the country, probably more, that thinks I'm a rapist," he said.

Mr Lehrmann is currently suing Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson for an interview with Ms Higgins on The Project, having settled a separate claim against News Life Media and journalist Samantha Maiden.

He is also suing the ABC for broadcasting a speech by Ms Higgins at the National Press Club early last year.

Mr Lehrmann said he was motivated to bring the defamation action in an effort to reduce the impact Ms Higgins's allegation had had on his reputation.

"I don't want to be known as the guy who could have, would have, allegedly raped Brittany Higgins," Mr Lehrmann said.

"That's a tag that's out there now, and I don't have the court system to remove that tag any more."

But Mr Lehrmann said he had the support and belief of his mother, who he described as "the only person" he needed to believe him.

"I don't need anybody else because that's my mum," he said.

"I'm a mummy's boy, and I'm proud of it."

In his statement of claim in his defamation action, Mr Lehrmann alleges he was identifiable in The Project's interview with Ms Higgins, despite not being named.

In the TV interview, he repeated those claims and said the reaction from people in his social circle was swift.

"Live before me, sitting in my lawyer's office, I'm seeing friends of mine block me on Facebook, remove me from group chats," he said.

"It is the metaphorical version of a nuclear bomb or the world exploding before your eyes.

"If that's not a clear indication of being identified without having been named formally, I don't know what is."

Mr Lehrmann said he had also not ruled out defamation action against Ms Higgins in future.

"I haven't ruled it out but I'm cognisant of the fact that … it's not a good look to kick someone when they're down. I have some sympathy for her," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955008

File: ee92919d9fd2ef6⋯.jpg (949.5 KB,2420x1816,605:454,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>18955007

2/2

'The guy who ruined my life'

Mr Lehrmann also used the interview to take aim at the ACT's top prosecutor, Shane Drumgold, who led the case against him.

When Mr Drumgold announced that a retrial would not go ahead, citing "an unacceptable risk" to Ms Higgins's welfare, he said he believed there were still reasonable prospects of a conviction.

Mr Lehrmann said that comment was unfair.

"He took my opportunity for a not guilty verdict away from me, but he then told Australia, 'I still could have won it.' What the f***?" he said.

"This is the guy who ruined my life."

Mr Drumgold's actions and those of other criminal justice agencies have recently been examined in an ACT inquiry into how the case was handled.

But no legal representatives have argued during the public hearings that Mr Drumgold was wrong to have taken the case to court.

Grilled on movements in ministerial office

Mr Lehrmann has said that on the night of the alleged incident, he and Ms Higgins had no further contact once they had entered the office of Senator Linda Reynolds.

Mr Lehrmann said he and Ms Higgins were at opposite sides of the office and separated by a wall.

He said he was attempting to be "a gentleman" in assisting Ms Higgins to travel to Parliament House.

Ms Higgins claims she did not intend to return to Parliament House, and believed the Uber the pair shared would take her home.

Mr Lehrmann was challenged about his version of events during the interview, including why he left the office without saying goodbye.

"The least you could do was just pop your head in, it'd take you two seconds, and say 'Brittany are you right? Have you finished? Because I'm going,'" journalist Liam Bartlett put to him.

"I assumed that she was there to do work," Mr Lehrmann replied.

"It's Parliament House, she's a staffer in her own right."

In a statement, a Seven spokesperson said Mr Lehrmann was not paid for the interview, but the program assisted with accommodation as part of the filming.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-04/bruce-lehrmann-speaks-to-channel-7-spotlight-program/102438934

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955017

File: 3f349713c5f46f8⋯.jpg (54.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_in_his_firs….jpg)

File: 28b3a5d01a9f3f7⋯.jpg (85.3 KB,768x768,1:1,CCTV_images_of_Brittany_Hi….jpg)

File: cae109a84e06d16⋯.jpg (69.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_and_Brittan….jpg)

File: 4bff5322ddbeb4d⋯.jpg (93.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,CCTV_shows_Bruce_Lehrmann_….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

‘Brittany Higgins lied to save her job’: Bruce Lehrmann

ELLIE DUDLEY - JUNE 5, 2023

1/2

Bruce Lehrmann has accused Brittany Higgins of lying about being raped to save her job, as he announced he had not ruled out suing the former Liberal staffer for defamation.

In a new, wide-ranging interview, Mr Lehrmann spoke of how her sexual assault allegation forced him to contemplate suicide.

The Spotlight episode also included footage of Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann arriving at Parliament House on the night of the alleged rape.

He claimed Ms Higgins intentionally told senator Linda Reynolds’ chief of staff, Fiona Brown, the “white lie” that he had raped her in order to keep her job after seeing him get sacked.

“I think that a white lie to save a job occurred and, tick, that happened, because she saw me getting the turf,” he told Channel 7’s Spotlight. “And then she’s come into contact with media elites that have latched onto this and, given the environment at the time, in 2021, to weaponise it and advance a movement really.”

Mr Lehrmann said after he had been fired by Ms Brown, there were two or three hours before Ms Higgins was called in to explain why she was in Parliament House at 2am on the night the alleged rape occurred.

“There’s no mention of a sexual assault in that first meeting with Fiona Brown,” he said. “And a second meeting with Fiona Brown occurs, she’s given an opportunity to sign the code of conduct, that crunch time of signing the contract for your job, and not until the very end of that second meeting was any inkling of an allegation of sexual assault.

“So it was clear that there was a pressure there that in order to save her dream job, as she told The Project, she needed to ensure that it was a satisfactory explanation in terms of why they’re keeping her around.”

While Ms Higgins was adamant in her media interviews and throughout Mr Lehrmann’s criminal trial that she was drunk and unable to walk unassisted when she arrived at parliament, Mr Lehrmann has maintained she was only “tipsy”.

In the security footage of the pair entering parliament, Ms Higgins was seen walking unassisted, at times jogging.

“(She was) tipsy but functioning,” Mr Lehrmann said. “And I know that the CCTV footage shows that.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955019

File: 3d991e0161c3be6⋯.jpg (92.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_and_Brittan….jpg)

File: 0ddc4a56a11d908⋯.jpg (106.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Never_before_seen_CCTV_foo….jpg)

File: 11cc1bb310c1e13⋯.jpg (119.33 KB,1280x720,16:9,Screen_grabs_from_Seven_s_….jpg)

>>18955017

2/2

Mr Lehrmann said he watched Ms Higgins’ interview with journalist Lisa Wilkinson on The Project live. He was not named in the interview, but as it aired he said he watched as his friends blocked him on social media. “If that’s not a clear indication of being identified, without having been named formally, then I don’t know what is,” he said.

In the days following the interview, Mr Lehrmann said he “went off the deep end”, leading to a near-suicide attempt in Sydney.

“I’d made arrangements to go. Mum was going to be OK. She’d get my superannuation,” he said. “There was no coming back. I’d actually even worked out the St Leonard’s train station. I was just going to go. I ended up taking myself to Royal North Shore Hospital that began a period of just strengthening my mind that there is a light at the end of this.”

Asked whether he had ruled out suing Ms Higgins for defamation, Mr Lehmann said: “That’s a possibility. I haven’t ruled it out, but I’m cognisant of the fact that … it’s not a good look. You kick someone when they’re down, and I have some sympathy for her because she’s obviously got people around her who they’re not there for her, they’re there for their own agendas.”

Mr Lehrmann is currently suing Network Ten and Ms Wilkinson for defamation over Ms Wilkinson’s interview with Ms Higgins.

Readers seeking support and information about suicide prevention can contact Lifeline on 13 11 14

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-lied-to-save-her-job-bruce-lehrmann/news-story/955d47d02cc2d676668914f3328f429b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955049

File: 642feac70b1ac41⋯.jpg (101.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Grace_Tame_L_and_Brittany_….jpg)

File: 99f29e200bab9e5⋯.jpg (120.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,National_Press_Club_Presid….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

‘Malicious’: ABC deliberately tried to prejudice my rape trial, says Bruce Lehrmann

STEPHEN RICE - JUNE 5, 2023

The ABC deliberately tried to prejudice Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial when it broadcast an address by Brittany Higgins and Grace Tame at the National Press Club knowing he had been publicly named and charged, according to documents just filed in the Federal Court.

Mr Lehrmann first filed his claim against the ABC in April but now claims it broadcast the Press Club event with “an improper motive”, namely to prejudice upcoming criminal proceedings against him, and that the broadcaster’s recklessness was so extreme that it amounted to “wilful blindness and constituted malice”.

On 9 February 2022, the ABC broadcast the National Press Club speech after the club promoted the sale of tickets to the event referring to Ms Higgins’ decision to “publicly allege she was raped by a colleague inside Parliament House”.

Although the speech did not name him, Mr Lehrmann was identifiable from what was said, having been named in multiple media reports after being charged with sexual intercourse without consent in August 2021, according to his lawyers.

“In her introduction to the NPC address ABC chief political correspondent Laura Tingle referred to ‘shocking allegations of assault’ and stated that ‘I don’t feel I really have to introduce Brittany Higgins and Grace Tame such has been their impact on the national stage.’”

Ms Higgins began her address with the words “I was raped on a couch in what I thought was the safest and most secure building in Australia.

“The parliament of Australia is safe – it is secure – except if you’re a woman. If what happened to me can happen there, it can happen anywhere. And it does. It happens to women everywhere.”

By broadcasting the event live, so that any defamatory statements could not be “bleeped” the broadcaster was “recklessly indifferent, negligent and wilfully blind to the likelihood” that Ms Higgins would make statements that were defamatory. and prejudicial to Mr Lehrmann’s upcoming trial, the new filing states.

Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers say “it was not only reasonably foreseeable, and high risk, but quite inevitable that Ms Higgins would, during the NPC address, repeat her allegation that she was sexually assaulted by an unnamed work colleague in Parliament House. “Ms Tingle certainly expected this would occur, as would have any rational observer.”

The ABC made no attempt to check the truth of the allegation they knew would be published, including by contacting Mr Lehrmann and seeking his response, his lawyers say.

“Even if a potential juror already had some awareness of the allegations made by Ms Higgins, their repetition in such a national forum, juxtaposed with the words of Ms Tame during the NPC address (whose assailant had actually been convicted in a Court), could only amount to an overwhelming message that Ms Higgins’ allegations were true and that she had been assaulted,” Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers say.

“Indeed the whole point of the NPC address was that Ms Higgins was telling the truth and that cultural and other change ought to follow.”

Mr Lehrmann has dropped legal action against News Corp over articles written on new.com.au but is pressing ahead with a defamation against Network Ten over allegations made on The Project during an interview by Ms Higgins with Lisa Wilkinson.

On Sunday the former Liberal staffer said he has not ruled out suing Ms Higgins personally for defamation.

Mr Lehrmann has always denied all charges.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/malicious-abc-deliberately-tried-to-prejudice-my-rape-trial-says-bruce-lehrmann/news-story/17ed6b19c75811af7b1d2b60ebba1d65

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955072

File: fcac97f54e80ab7⋯.jpg (52.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_told_Spotli….jpg)

File: e4a2b262688409c⋯.jpg (43.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lehrmann_says_police_exami….jpg)

File: 29839a2ecca2a3d⋯.jpg (121.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Channel_7_also_aired_never….jpg)

File: e74d175ba257fef⋯.jpg (74.52 KB,1280x721,1280:721,CCTV_vision_showed_the_two….jpg)

File: b99989ce4f5656f⋯.jpg (67.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Lehrmann_said_the_bruis….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

‘It’s pretty sick’: Bruce Lehrmann denies giving Brittany Higgins bruise in tell-all interview

Bruce Lehrmann broke his two-year broadcast media silence in Sunday’s tell-all interview, revealing his own theory behind his accuser’s bruise.

Elena Couper - June 5, 2023

Bruce Lehrmann has accused Brittany Higgins of having “fabricated” a photo of a bruise she claimed he inflicted during an alleged sexual assault.

In February 2021, Ms Higgins spoke on The Project with host Lisa Wilkinson in an explosive interview regarding the alleged rape, during which she shared a disturbing image of a large bruise on her leg.

On Sunday evening, Mr Lehrmann addressed the photograph in his own sit-down interview on the Channel 7’s Spotlight program, denying the authenticity of the image.

“It was fabricated,” he said.

“That’s the only explanation … or it’s a bruise from much later.”

Ms Higgins said in her 2021 interview that the site of the bruise was “essentially where (Mr Lehrmann’s) leg pinned (her) down”.

“It’s quite a large bruise, and it’s just the weight, obviously, of his leg pinning me down,” she said.

“I have this weird big bruise on the basis of where it was sort of positioned.”

Ms Higgins said she took the photograph in the office “a couple of days after” the alleged incident occurred in February 2019, as the mark “took a little bit” of time to appear.

The reliability of the image was contested during Mr Lehrmann’s trial, as Ms Higgins didn’t mention the bruise or the photo in AFP interviews.

Police examinations could not locate the image or any reference to it in text messages until 2021.

On Sunday, Spotlight host Liam Bartlett asked Mr Lehrmann whether he was suggesting Ms Higgins “took that picture and used it”, to which he nodded in reply.

“It would appear that she’s given that to The Project to enhance the weaponisation of her sexual assault allegation,” Mr Lehrmann said.

“It’s pretty sick.”

He said “it would appear” that he had been framed by Ms Higgins, suggesting she made up the assault “to save (her) job” after she saw him “getting the turf”.

Seven also aired never-before-seen security footage of Parliament House from the night of the alleged assault as well as audio from a recording of a five-hour lunch between Ms Higgins, her boyfriend David Sharaz and Wilkinson prior to the February 15 interview.

During the meeting, Ms Higgins told Wilkinson that as a “girl from the western suburbs of Sydney”, she would always be motivated by “exactly the same thing”.

“People who deserve to be heard, not being heard,” she said.

Wilkinson said while she didn’t want to “put words in (her) mouth”, she would like Ms Higgins to discuss the work culture of Parliament House.

The Project host suggested Ms Higgins could “enunciate the fact that this place is all about suppression of people’s natural sense of justice”.

On Sunday Mr Lehrmann said Ms Higgins had told a “white lie” to protect her job “and then she’s come into contact with media elites that have sort of latched onto this … to weaponise it … and to advance a movement, really”.

Both Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann were Liberal staffers at the time of the alleged assault, with CCTV vision placing them at Parliament House in the early hours of March 23, 2019.

The two had been out drinking with other colleagues before agreeing to split a rideshare to their respective homes.

Instead, the pair went to Parliament House, Mr Lehrmann subsequently giving four different reasons for doing so.

Ms Higgins said she was then raped by Mr Lehrmann in the ministerial office of former defence minister Linda Reynolds, an accusation Mr Lehrmann has consistently denied.

“It simply didn’t happen,” he told Bartlett.

He maintained that after arriving at Parliament House he and Ms Higgins went in separate directions and 40 minutes later he left without saying goodbye.

Ms Higgins was found by a parliament security guard conducting a welfare check later that morning.

The initial trial was abandoned in 2022 due to jury misconduct, with prosecutors dropping charges against Mr Lehrmann earlier this year, concerned over the impact a second trial could have on Ms Higgins’ mental health.

After Ms Higgins’ interview on The Project aired, Mr Lehrmann launched defamation proceedings against Channel 10, the ABC and News Life Media over their coverage.

He has since reached a settlement with News, while the other cases are ongoing.

He revealed on Sunday that he was “not ruling … out” defamation action against Ms Higgins.

“Beware the man who’s got nothing to lose,” he said.

“There’s a bit more to come yet.”

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/current-affairs/its-pretty-sick-bruce-lehrmann-denies-giving-brittany-higgins-bruise-in-tellall-interview/news-story/e7bb1e435ac7355b151884a3fbf63b86

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955096

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18928680

>>18954987

Tanya Plibersek hits back over Brittany Higgins question

ELLEN RANSLEY - JUNE 5, 2023

1/2

A senior politician singled out by Lisa Wilkinson as a “friendly MP” likely to help fuel momentum for Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation in question time says she was never approached and would not have accepted being told what to ask.

Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek was asked five times by Natalie Barr whether or not she had been approached to help fuel the story when she appeared on Sunrise on Monday morning.

She said she reached out to Ms Higgins after she made her sexual assault allegations public two years ago.

Ms Plibersek, who at the time was a senior opposition frontbencher, said she did not recall if the former political staffer had spoken to her about “firing up” specific questions during question time.

Channel 7’s Spotlight on Sunday night featured an extensive interview with Bruce Lehrmann, the former staffer accused of raping Ms Higgins in Parliament House in 2019. The charge was dropped by the ACT DPP in 2022.

Ms Higgins made her accusations public in 2021 when she was interview by Wilkinson on The Project.

In Sunday’s program, Mr Lehrmann denied raping, or being intimate with Ms Higgins.

The show included segments of a recording from a five-hour pre-interview meeting between Wilkinson, her producer, Ms Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz.

The recording showed it had been a deliberate decision to break the story during a parliamentary sitting week so that the government would “have to answer questions at question time, it’s a mess for them”.

The recording aired on Sunday night included a discussion on how to recruit “friendly MPs” to “fire questions” in question time over the alleged sexual assault.

In a small part of the recording aired during the trial, Mr Sharaz told the group that he had a “friend in Labor” and senator Katy Gallagher would “probe and continue it going”.

In the section of the recording aired on Sunday night, Wilkinson said “certainly Albo” but later backtracked on suggesting Anthony Albanese – describing him as a “bit of a dead duck at the moment”.

Wilkinson also suggested “Tanya Plibersek, definitely”, to which Mr Sharaz said: “Yeah.”

Ms Barr repeatedly asked Ms Plibersek whether she was approached to raise Ms Higgins’ complaint.

When she failed to give a straight answer, Ms Barr fired back, saying “With respect, could you answer the question?”

“Were you approached by Lisa Wilkinson or her producer to raise Britney Higgins’ alleged assaults in question time, Tanya?”

Ms Plibersek said she had not been approached by Ms Higgins or Ms Wilkinson.

“Nobody tells me what to ask in question time,” Ms Plibersek told Channel 7 on Monday.

“I reached out to check on her. She did not reach out to me.”

Pressed further, Ms Plibersek reiterated that the extent of her involvement was to check in on Ms Higgins, saying she was “very upset and a fragile young woman”.

“It is absolutely no surprise that anybody would think that I would follow up on it, an instance like this,” she said.

“For 30 years I have been campaigning for better investigation and better treatment of victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and child sexual assault. It’s been a constant party of my political activism, long before anybody heard of Brittany Higgins.

“I’ve been doing this for decades now, and it is no surprise that I would be interested in justice being served in a situation like this.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955099

File: b9e97ccc4a0eb5c⋯.jpg (100.71 KB,1280x720,16:9,Tanya_Plibersek_said_she_w….jpg)

File: cdeec9bc373a13c⋯.jpg (130.24 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Lehrmann_has_always_mai….jpg)

File: 76df75c3a0a9764⋯.jpg (138.44 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_suggested_M….jpg)

>>18955096

2/2

‘I don’t need to see that’: Minister responds to interview

During Mr Lehrmann’s interview, the former Liberal staffer denied raping Ms Higgins, saying it “simply didn’t happen”.

Mr Lehrmann also described the “dark day” that the allegations were first aired and detailed how, in the wake of that, he had considered suicide.

The show on Sunday night included never-before-seen security footage from the night Ms Higgins alleged Mr Lehrmann raped her.

Asked whether she had – or would – watch the interview, Ms Plibersek gave an emphatic, resounding “no”.

“I don’t want to watch it. I don’t want to platform Bruce Lehrmann, sorry,” she told Channel 7.

Asked whether she was interested in seeing “what went on behind the scenes”, including the footage never seen before, Ms Plibsersek doubled down.

“I don’t need to see that. I’m not deciding the case here. This has gone through the courts and the result is as the result is. It makes no difference whether I watch it or not,” she said.

During his interview, Mr Lehrmann said he had been “kicked to a kerb” by his colleagues.

“People were dropping me because I was politically inconvenient to be associated with,” he said.

He said he had been forced to “dip into” his mum’s superannuation and had been loaned money from his uncle.

During the interview, Mr Lehrmann was grilled by Liam Bartlett over why he and Ms Higgins had returned to Parliament House in the early hours of the morning after a night of heavy drinking.

Mr Lehrmann said he had “tried to be a gentlemen” and believed Ms Higgins also needed to return to Parliament House. Mr Lehrmann said he needed to return to his office to retrieve his house keys and to pull some notes together.

Security camera footage shows the pair entering the ministerial wing together before they are escorted to a lift.

Mr Lehrmann said the two had gone “their separate ways” once they reached Linda Reynolds’ office. Mr Lehrmann was pressed on why he hadn’t checked on Ms Higgins before he left.

“My mind was focused on getting my keys, noting down what I needed to note down and getting back to my girlfriend who had called a number of times,” Mr Lehrmann said.

Mr Lehrmann’s trial was forced to be abandoned due to juror misconduct.

The ACT Director of Public Prosecutions subsequently dropped the charge out of concern for Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Mr Lehrmann has always maintained his innocence.

Mr Lehrmann in his interview suggested he was looking at the “possibility” of suing Ms Higgins for defamation.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/tanya-plibersek-hits-back-over-brittany-higgins-question/news-story/4371ec0a93f993d9f14a640e0e12921b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3uzHfPd1VI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955149

File: f1f15a2e66ae07e⋯.jpg (98.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Noel_Pearson_has_moved_to_….jpg)

File: ff53b580157502f⋯.jpg (116.44 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Albanese_s_approval_rat….jpg)

File: e5b4943e8f594d5⋯.jpg (338.46 KB,815x702,815:702,Voice_to_parliament.jpg)

>>18775344 (pb)

>>18860464 (pb)

Newspoll reveals 46% of Australians intend to vote ‘yes’ to an Indigenous voice to parliament in referendum, 43% no

SIMON BENSON - JUNE 5, 2023

1/2

Less than half of eligible Australians now say they will vote in favour of a referendum to enshrine a voice to parliament and executive government in a troubling sign for the yes campaign and Anthony Albanese’s ambitions to ­secure constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander people.

An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows only 46 per cent of voters approve of ­altering the Constitution to give effect to an Indigenous voice as proposed by the federal government.

With opinion almost equally divided, 43 per cent of voters said they would vote no, while 11 per cent said they didn’t know.

The exclusive poll follows the passage of the voice referendum legislation through the house of representatives last week.

It is the first Newspoll survey to present voters with the precise question they will be asked at the ballot box when the referendum is held this year.

Past Newspoll surveys showing support for a voice to parliament above 50 per cent were based on a more general question.

The new survey suggests that the contest is now closer than previous polls have suggested, with the referendum poised to go either way with clear generational divisions now emerging amid a schism between regional Australia and the capital cities.

Leading the case for the Yes vote were women voters, young voters and the city-based university educated. Men were narrowly more likely to vote No, with regional, non-university educated and the over 50s leading the strongest opposition to the voice.

While 63 of Coalition voters were opposed, almost a quarter of Labor voters also intended to vote No.

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson on Sunday launched an attack on Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, labelling as “duplicitous” his claims that enshrining the Indigenous voice to parliament in the Constitution would divide and “re-racialise the nation”

Mr Pearson moved to allay fears over the workings of the voice, saying parliament would have the power to overhaul the body and replace it with something else should the original model not work as intended.

The Prime Minister remains confident that the Yes campaign will prevail, last week saying that Australians would be driven by an instinct for a “fair go”.

“Not because I am innately an optimist but because of who we have shown ourselves to be,” he said in his Lowitja O’Donoghue Oration.

“That instinct for fairness – the great Australian instinct for the fair go that defines us – remains fundamental of our identity.”

Mr Albanese also said that Australians would not succumb to scare campaigns about how the voice would operate.

“Australians won’t succumb to their appeals to fear and their ever more ludicrous invitations to jump at our own shadows,” he said.

“That’s because Australians have a healthy scepticism of doomsayers, a scepticism kept in good health by memories of all the predictions offered by the Chicken Littles of the past.” However, the Newspoll survey of 1549 voters, conducted between May 31 and June 3, shows significant opposition to the referendum question being posed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955155

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18955149

2/2

The Newspoll question asked voters: “Later this year, Australians will decide at a referendum whether to alter the Australian Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

The Newspoll survey shows a geographic and cultural divide over the voice, with 48 per cent of regional voters opposed and 42 per cent in favour. These numbers were reversed among metropolitan voters with 48 per cent approval of the proposed alteration and 40 per cent against.

On gender lines, 47 per cent of women approved the change to the Constitution compared to 40 per cent who didn’t. Male voters, however, were split 46/45 per cent with a slight advantage for the No vote. The voting intentions were also clearly split along party political lines, reflective of the increasingly hostile political debate, with 64 per cent of Coalition voters opposed compared to 63 per cent of Labor voters and 71 per cent of Greens voters in favour.

A deep level of antipathy was also evident among voters identifying with minor parties and independents – a large proportion reflected by supporters of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation – with 64 per cent opposed.

Mr Albanese also faces a generational challenge in ensuring a successful outcome. Among younger voters, 65 per cent of 18 to 34 years are in favour and to a lesser degree, 53 per cent of 35 to 49 years. But this turned sharply among the older age brackets with 55 per cent of 50 to 64-year-old voters opposed to the voice and 61 per cent of over-65s.

When broken down to educational demographics, university-educated voters were more likely – 56 per cent – to vote Yes. Those with skills-based qualifications and/or no tertiary education were more inclined to vote No.

The special referendum poll comes as Mr Albanese’s approval ratings fell two points to 55 per cent while broader support for both major parties remained unchanged, with Labor still leading the Coalition on a primary vote of 38 per cent to 34 per cent for the Coalition, and retaining its two-party preferred lead of 55/45.

The only movement in electoral support was a one-point gain for the Greens to 12 per cent and a one-point fall to 6 per cent for PHON. Other minor parties and independents remained unchanged at 10 per cent.

Mr Dutton’s approval ratings remained unchanged at 36 per cent, while in the head-to-head contest both leaders fell a point with Mr Albanese leading 55/28 as preferred prime minister.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/newspoll-less-than-half-intend-to-vote-yes-to-voice-enshrined-in-constitution/news-story/c6639a09298c4a3c5c3b8650f1688df6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fprQzlt2HD4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955174

File: 09f04af725a3911⋯.jpg (203.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_Newspoll_survey_shows_46….jpg)

>>18955149

>>18949840

Voice campaigners confident despite new polling

Maeve Bannister and Andrew Brown - June 5 2023

Campaigners for an Indigenous voice remain confident of success at the upcoming referendum despite declining support in new opinion polling.

The latest Newspoll shows 46 per cent backing for the proposal, dropping from 54 per cent earlier this year.

Some 43 per cent of those surveyed were opposed and 11 per cent did not know.

The referendum, due to be held between October and December, needs a national majority as well as a majority of voters in at least four states for the constitution to be changed.

But Yes 23 campaign director Dean Parkin said he expected support to grow for the voice as it moves away from political debate in parliament and into communities.

"It's understandable in some ways that there has been some tightening up in the numbers. We knew this would always become contested," he told Sky News.

"The conversation has been bogged in Canberra in politics, in a fair bit of negativity there."

Mr Parkin said the Newspoll results differed from those found when talking to people in the community.

"It's quite encouraging actually when you get out into the community. That goodwill we've talked about for a long … time is absolutely still there," he said.

"There's five months between now and when we think the referendum will be had.

"We think there's plenty of time between now and then to actually have that conversation with more Australians."

The Newspoll showed women voters mostly in favour of the 'yes' side, 47 per cent to 40 per cent against.

Among males, 46 per cent were in the 'no' camp while 45 per cent backed the 'yes' side.

Former ACT chief minister Kate Carnell, who is leading a Liberals for 'yes' campaign, said support would ramp up once referendum legislation passes the Senate later this month.

"We'll be able to move the campaign where it should be and that's down to grassroots Australia where it should be," she told ABC Radio on Monday.

"Really, this shouldn't be a political debate at all.

"It should be a debate out there in the community. It's every Australian that needs to vote on this."

The Liberals group is made up of Ms Carnell, former NSW premier Mike Baird, Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff, ACT Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee and federal backbenchers Julian Leeser and Bridget Archer.

Ms Carnell said the constitutional changes proposed were safe options and would bring the country together.

"The message is, if we just keep doing the same thing in this space, we'll end up with the same outcomes," she said.

"Liberals, I hope, will be focused on on getting practical change."

The federal Liberals support constitutional recognition of Indigenous people but want parliament to legislate local and regional voices.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8221491/voice-campaigners-confident-despite-new-polling/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955207

File: 6699dcfc8860b68⋯.jpg (167.94 KB,1024x768,4:3,Anthony_Albanese_s_ambitio….jpg)

File: 996f1fa9d621f7b⋯.jpg (172.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Megan_Davis.jpg)

>>18928670

>>18955149

Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaigners must persuade dubious Australians ahead of referendum

GREG CRAVEN - JUNE 5, 2023

1/2

There is one unlikely point of agreement between the Yes and No camps for the voice referendum. Terror of the consequences of a lost vote.

Each understands Indigenous Australians will be shattered. Each will blame the other. The scorched earth will belong to both.

For Yes supporters – including me – winning is the only course. Politics, personalities and even past drafting disputes are irrelevant.

But the immediate challenge is that the polling for the voice is not good. It is threatening. Multiple polls place the Yes vote between the high 40s and low 50s. Support for No is in the mid 30s. Undecideds are around 20 per cent. There is not a Yes majority in a single state.

Every referendum has its own baggage, which just has to be carried. This one is a Labor product, driven by powerful Indigenous leaders, and never open to change. It eschews bipartisanship.

There does exist a substantial Yes infrastructure, Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition. This is a coalition of Indigenous leaders such as Rachel Perkins and Megan Davis and whitefella supporters. It has both mass and internal tensions.

AIRC also has an enormous amount of campaign money, around $17m from corporate and other backers. It will have an extensive campaign staff, including prominent pollster Mark Textor.

Yet despite all these resources, the polls are so weak. True, the main battle is not joined. But preliminary skirmishing has gone poorly. Timing is vital. The Yes camp’s vast resources must be deployed promptly. Holding fire because referendum day is four months away would be a grave mistake. Once someone congeals to No, they will not be shifted.

This assumes Yes promotions actually will be helpful. Preliminary offerings have been uninspiring. A bad campaign will lose, not garner, votes. What must the Yes campaign do to win, and not do to avoid losing? It already is clear the Yes forces face some challenging strategic choices.

A basic difficulty is the level of ambition. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has gone from a Yes vote being “modest” to now being “historic”. He even talks decolonisation. But history shows constitutionally nervous Australians do not vote for an amendment because it is big. Small and modest works. “A Fair Go” would be a better mantra than “Make History”.

Yet Albanese and allies are stuck. The proposal cannot be sold on its detail. It is already highly partisan. Surging on the vibe may be the only, yet dangerous option. Even so, the vibe can be calculated or undisciplined. Plausible appeals to fairness will beat lofty appeals to history.

Critically, the Yes case cannot just talk to itself. It must persuade the dubious. The language of “history” is inspiring to its enthusiasts but will worry soft voters. Assuring your own vote is pointless.

The Yes case must not, like the republic, assume a uniform national audience typed by Sydney. This referendum will comprise micro “markets”, requiring highly tailored messages. Western Australia and Queensland, with their challenging histories around Indigenous people, will require delicate handling. In fact, recent polls suggest they are lost causes.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955210

File: b935370bcd62086⋯.jpg (133.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_Senator_P….jpg)

>>18955207

2/2

There are other difficult examples. Poorer Australians with limited educational opportunities will be less inclined to vote yes because they have their own painful disadvantages. This group destroyed a self-indulgent, “elitist” republic, and must be addressed with care and respect.

The Yes case cannot adopt self-serving fantasies. It does not monopolise social media, as recent weeks have shown. The No side can indeed campaign on natural media momentum. The young and migrants will not automatically vote yes without nurturing. Yes officials are not all geniuses.

It cannot assume this is the same-sex marriage plebiscite. Permanent constitutional amendment is much harder. Same-sex was a family issue for most Australians. The voice is not. It cannot run a campaign without some bipartisan credibility. It must promote conservative voices such as Julian Leeser to balance Peter Dutton. It cannot just concede over a third of the electorate.

Some tempting strategies are poison. Featuring politically correct heroes will fail utterly. Sports stars, actors and cultural leaders sank the republic. People resented the condescension. Multi-millionaire Michael Chaney’s recent demand Australia vote yes or face international business condemnation is instructive. People are irritated by a plutocrat issuing instructions to pariahs.

Eschewing moral blackmail is vital. If voters feel shamed into voting yes, the referendum is doomed. Moralisation around the “right side of history” and “decolonisation” is dangerous. Complicating agendas for reparations, political sovereignty, treaty and truth need to be parked.

The core of the referendum must be an appeal from Indigenous to non-Indigenous Australia, in all goodwill, and indeed love. It must firmly put past disadvantage without rancour, current disadvantage with cooperative insistence, and future opportunity with shared hope and confidence.

As the Uluru process itself pointed, any success will be based on agreement, not a demand or shaming, let alone a threat.

This will require discipline, co-operation and forbearance on the Yes side. No one owns the referendum. No one is its hero. No one, let alone the Australian people, are monsters.

Nor can we afford a campaign complicated, vexed, egotistical and divided. Uncertainty and division are the lifeblood of any No campaign.

Righteous self-congratulation will be icy consolation in the wreckage of a lost referendum.

Emeritus Professor Greg Craven is a constitutional lawyer.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-yes-case-must-persuade-the-dubious/news-story/c5ad7714fcf2cd49c70b0dcae62394fb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955225

File: 751759a573d13ac⋯.jpg (125.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_with_the_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18955149

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament ‘Yes’ campaign strategy is faltering

SIMON BENSON - JUNE 4, 2023

Only several months out from the referendum and the Indigenous voice to parliament is in trouble.

The strength of the No vote is now significant and the Newspoll results may well come as a shock to the other side.

The findings don’t bode well for Anthony Albanese, whose political strategy to hold back detail of the voice to parliament and go on the vibe of constitutional recognition is clearly failing.

The Prime Minister’s conviction that the moral imperative will win over Australians is being put to the test.

The first Newspoll to present voters with the precise wording of the referendum question suggests that if it were held this weekend, it could go either way.

As the political debate becomes more partisan, so too have the electoral divisions deepened.

There is now a chasm between regional and metropolitan voters, just as there is a generational split.

There are divisions across almost every demographic. The university-educated and tradies, the young and the old, Labor and Liberal and city and bush.

These partitions will be a significant challenge for Albanese to overcome as he pushes back against the opposition claims that the model the government is pushing ahead with is itself divisive.

The poll results suggest the debate is now shaping up as one being led by elites on one side and everybody else on the other.

The poll results also stand as a warning sign for advocate business leaders that their customer base and employees may not necessarily be signed up to the inevitability of the referendum’s assumed success.

Previous polls conducted prior to the wording having been settled have presented a more general question.

All these polls showed support for the Yes case at slightly more than 50 per cent. The general consensus was that momentum for the proposition had stalled.

The new survey showing support at just 46 per cent – with 11 per cent undecided – would suggest that it might struggle to pass the second test, a majority of states.

The results can only suggest that the No campaign, as disparate a grouping as it is, is succeeding in presenting a more effective and cleaner message.

The Yes campaign approach, meanwhile, appears heavily influenced by the experience of the ’99 republic referendum and the question of too much detail.

So far, the polls show no sign of issue leakage, with Labor voters appearing to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time.

While a quarter of Labor supporters say they will vote No, it hasn’t impacted broader voting intention.

Albanese remains dominant and the popular support for the party remains comparatively high.

Yet on the voice numbers, it is clearly apparent that Albanese is losing the argument. Having ruled out concessions, in a high-risk strategy, time is running out.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/voice-referendum-in-trouble-as-albanese-strategy-falters/news-story/77e54b739f169f490b7af0210e669b9e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955265

File: 28924023d733f4f⋯.jpg (147.52 KB,960x686,480:343,_Not_an_honest_and_reliabl….jpg)

>>18934029

‘Not an honest and reliable witness’: Judge’s scathing assessment of Roberts-Smith

Michaela Whitboure - June 5, 2023

1/2

Disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith gave false evidence, threatened a former comrade who later testified against him and arranged “unusual” legal fee payments for supportive witnesses, the judge who dismissed his multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit said.

In the full reasons for the judgment, released on Monday, Federal Court judge Anthony Besanko said the former Special Air Service corporal was “not an honest and reliable witness in … many areas”. He endorsed the credibility and honesty of witnesses who detailed Roberts-Smith’s wrongdoing.

In a landmark decision, a summary of which was released last week, Besanko found that The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times had proven Roberts-Smith was a war criminal who unlawfully killed four unarmed prisoners and assaulted others during deployments in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. The judge also found the Victoria Cross recipient had bullied a fellow soldier.

The release of the full decision was delayed until Monday after the Commonwealth asked for time to review the judgment to avoid any inadvertent disclosure of national security information.

Besanko did not find the news outlets had proven the former soldier committed an act of domestic violence against a lover, but he found that in light of other proven allegations, Roberts-Smith’s reputation had not suffered additional damage and that part of his case should be dismissed. He also found that Roberts-Smith’s behaviour towards the woman, known as Person 17, was at times “intimidatory, threatening and controlling”.

Besanko’s full judgment said the “combined effect” of evidence of current and former SAS soldiers who implicated Roberts-Smith in the execution of two Afghan prisoners at a compound dubbed Whiskey 108 on Easter Sunday 2009 was “powerful”.

There was “no evidence of a plausible motive to lie or collusion” between the witnesses, Besanko said, and they “were independent, had no interest in the result and were aware of the significance of giving evidence. Furthermore, they were in a position to observe the events about which they gave evidence.”

On the other hand, he said, Roberts-Smith had motives to lie including potential damages, the risk to his reputation and the increased prospect of prosecution.

Besanko said Roberts-Smith arranged, through a private eye, to have threatening letters sent in 2018 to a serving soldier dubbed Person 18, who would later give evidence for the newspapers.

“Clearly this conclusion reflects adversely on the credit of the applicant [Roberts-Smith],” he said.

The judge found Roberts-Smith came to an unusual arrangement under which he was responsible for paying the more than $250,000 in legal fees of three of his own SAS witnesses, Persons 5, 11 and 35, both in connection with the defamation proceedings and an inquiry by the Inspector-General of the Defence Force.

“I do not consider that any of them were completely frank and forthcoming about their knowledge concerning the payment of their legal fees and that is a matter that affects their credit,” Besanko said.

“I find that [Roberts-Smith] … made the arrangements because he considered that these witnesses, among others, support his version of events. He was and is no doubt alive to the fact that … the witnesses will feel less inclined to change their mind and refuse to co-operate or to change an account previously given in circumstances in which the applicant has arranged for the payment of their legal fees.”

Roberts-Smith was not in Sydney to hear the judgment summary delivered on Thursday. His barrister, Arthur Moses, SC, asked the court to extend the usual 28-day period for filing an appeal to 42 days.

The war veteran’s defamation case was launched in 2018 against The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald, owned by Nine, and The Canberra Times, now under separate ownership, and the trial concluded in July last year after 110 days, 41 witnesses and more than $25 million in legal costs.

Roberts-Smith will be ordered to pay the newspapers’ costs as the unsuccessful party to the litigation. However, the media outlets have raised the prospect of seeking a third-party costs order against Roberts-Smith’s former employer, Seven West Media chairman Kerry Stokes, who bankrolled the lawsuit using private funds.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955271

File: 05e6cf734e0fada⋯.jpg (488.59 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Journalists_Nick_McKenzie_….jpg)

>>18955265

2/2

Nicholas Owens, SC, acting for the news outlets, told the court on Thursday: “We do anticipate making an application for indemnity costs, at least against the applicant [Roberts-Smith], and also a third-party costs order, possibly on an indemnity basis as well.”

Indemnity costs cover a higher proportion of a successful party’s legal bill than a standard costs order.

Roberts-Smith had alleged the newspapers accused him of being a war criminal who was complicit in the unlawful execution of three unarmed Afghan prisoners over two days.

Besanko found the newspapers had proved to the civil standard – the balance of probabilities – that those claims were substantially true. In a criminal trial, the standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt.

Killings proved

The newspapers established that Roberts-Smith kicked an unarmed and handcuffed Afghan villager named Ali Jan off a small cliff in Darwan on September 11, 2012, before procuring a soldier under his command, dubbed Person 11, to shoot the villager.

Besanko said in his full judgment that Roberts-Smith “falsely reported that Ali Jan was a [Taliban] spotter who had been engaged” in combat in a cornfield, but he had “murdered Ali Jan”.

Roberts-Smith had “aided, abetted, counselled or procured Person 11 in the murder of Ali Jan”, the judge said.

The news outlets also established that Roberts-Smith was involved in two murders during an earlier mission on Easter Sunday 2009, after two Afghan men were discovered in a tunnel in a compound dubbed Whiskey 108.

Besanko found that Roberts-Smith killed one of the men himself and directed a “rookie” soldier, Person 4, to kill the second man as a form of “blooding” or initiation.

The judge also found the news outlets had proven a fourth murder, which did not appear in the news reports but was part of an extensive truth defence. This killing related to directions Roberts-Smith gave via an interpreter for an unarmed Afghan man to be shot by a member of the Afghan Partner Force in 2012 at Chinartu.

Besanko found that two other alleged murders, which did not form part of the news stories but appeared in the newspapers’ defence, were not established.

Bullying proven

The judge also found the newspapers had established to the civil standard of proof that Roberts-Smith engaged in a campaign of bullying against a fellow soldier, dubbed Person 1, including making a death threat against him.

Person 1 gave evidence that Roberts-Smith told him in 2006 that “if your performance doesn’t improve on our next patrol, you’re going to get a bullet in the back of the head”.

“The context in which that statement was made leads me to conclude that this was a death threat,” Besanko said.

“I firmly reject any suggestion that it was the applicant advising Person 1 that he needed to improve his performance as a soldier otherwise he might be shot by the Taliban.”

In making his findings, the judge made clear that “there is no doubt that a court is not bound to accept the case of one or other of the parties” and “it may reject the case of both parties”.

The court heard Roberts-Smith had ended a turbulent six-month affair with a woman, dubbed Person 17, by the time the first of the newspaper articles was published. Besanko found Roberts-Smith had lied about being separated from his wife at the time and said it “reflects adversely on his credit”.

Person 17, whose identity was suppressed by the court, alleged in court that Roberts-Smith punched her on the left side of her face and eye following a dinner in Parliament House in Canberra in 2018.

Roberts-Smith vehemently rejected the allegation, and a former army officer at the dinner said he witnessed Person 17 fall down the stairs.

Besanko said he did not accept Roberts-Smith’s evidence about the alleged incident, but he was “not satisfied that Person 17’s evidence is sufficiently reliable to form the basis of a finding that the assault occurred”.

The parties return to court on June 29, when the issue of costs will be discussed further.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/not-an-honest-and-reliable-witness-judge-s-scathing-assessment-of-roberts-smith-20230605-p5ddz5.html

https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/services/access-to-files-and-transcripts/online-files/ben-roberts-smith

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2023/2023fca0555/_nocache

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/640057/J230555.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955292

File: 9a8ea10fb85293f⋯.jpg (43.22 KB,1024x576,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_sued_The….jpg)

>>18934029

>>18955265

Ben Roberts-Smith may have committed criminal offence, judge in defamation trial finds

Jamie McKinnell - 5 June 2023

1/2

War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith may have committed a criminal offence by sending threatening letters to a former SAS colleague, a Federal Court judge has found.

The war veteran's case against three newspapers was dismissed last week, but the judge only read out a summarised version of his decision.

Mr Roberts-Smith sued The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Canberra Times and three journalists, denying allegations contained in a series of 2018 reports of war crimes, bullying and domestic violence.

The judge was satisfied, to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, that allegations Mr Roberts-Smith was involved or complicit in four unlawful killings in Afghanistan were substantially true.

Mr Roberts-Smith had also denied sending anonymous, threatening letters to a former SAS colleague in 2018 by asking a private detective, John McLeod, to post material on his behalf.

In the full judgement, published today, Justice Anthony Besanko said the sending of the letters may constitute a criminal offence; either perverting the course of justice or using a postal service to menace, harass or cause offence.

"I am satisfied on the evidence that the applicant, through Mr McLeod, arranged for two threatening letters to be sent to Person 18."

The judgement, which runs to more than 720 pages, also includes a finding that Mr Roberts-Smith was "not an honest and reliable witness in the many areas".

The judge acknowledged the veteran remained composed during a "challenging" cross-examination.

But Nine's lawyers argued Mr Roberts-Smith had shown himself prepared to lie under oath and accused some of his witnesses of collusion.

'An honest witness'

One of the imputations Justice Besanko found to be substantially true was that Mr Roberts-Smith "murdered an unarmed and defenceless Afghan civilian, by kicking him off a cliff and procuring the soldiers under his command to shoot him".

This reflected one of the newspapers' centrepiece allegations, which they said involved the death of a farmer named Ali Jan during a mission in the village of Darwan in September 2012.

Justice Besanko accepted that an SAS witness, called by Nine, who gave crucial evidence about this mission was "an honest witness".

That soldier, known in court as Person 4, testified that he was left shocked when he saw Mr Roberts-Smith "catapult" Mr Jan over a slope, causing a number of his teeth to be knocked out when he hit a rock.

He also gave evidence that the injured Afghan man was then dragged towards a large tree, and recalled hearing three shots after Mr Roberts-Smith had a quick conversation with another SAS soldier, Person 11.

"I do not consider that any of his evidence was driven by ill will or professional jealousy against the applicant," Justice Besanko said in his judgement.

Mr Roberts-Smith's barrister, Arthur Moses SC, signalled outside court last week that the veteran's legal team would consider the lengthy judgment and issues around a possible appeal.

They have 42 days to file any appeal.

Mr Roberts-Smith did not attend the decision in person and his lawyer has not returned ABC requests for a statement on his behalf.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955297

File: 178a311d711c81d⋯.jpg (584.96 KB,3000x1963,3000:1963,The_war_veteran_s_case_aga….jpg)

>>18955292

2/2

Whiskey 108

Another area of contention which dominated much of the evidence, was whether any Afghan men surrendered from a tunnel discovered at a Taliban compound known as Whiskey 108, in 2009.

The judge was satisfied of the substantial truth of the allegation Mr Roberts-Smith "committed murder by machine gunning a man with a prosthetic leg" during this mission, and pressured a junior soldier to execute a second Afghan man.

These men, according to Nine's case, had surrendered from the tunnel.

But Mr Roberts-Smith insisted a man killed that day was an armed insurgent he encountered outside the compound, and several of his witnesses denied any men surrendered.

One of Nine's witnesses, a soldier codenamed Person 24, recalled seeing Mr Roberts-Smith march a man out of the compound, before machine gunning him in the back.

He recalled asking a colleague, Person 14, whether they just witnessed "an execution".

Justice Besanko said the suggested "motives to lie" of these two men and a third SAS witness who also testified about Whiskey 108 — matters of professional jealousy — seemed "unlikely to lead one witness, let alone three witnesses, to knowingly give false evidence".

He also accepted the evidence of another witness, Person 41, who testified about the alleged execution.

The judge said there were reasons to "scrutinise" Person 14's evidence, and to approach Person 24's testimony "with caution".

"However, it does not stand alone, and is supported by the evidence of Persons 14 and 41," the judge said.

"Further, relevant to the analysis is that there is no suggestion that there has been any collusion, or indeed contamination, between Person 41 on the one hand, and Persons 14 and 24 on the other."

The judge rejected Mr Roberts-Smith's account of the mission, along with the accounts of four witnesses his legal team called to support his case.

"The applicant's account is highly improbable when all the matters I have identified previously are considered together."

"Furthermore, there are a series of inconsistencies between the applicant's account and the respective accounts of his witnesses which I have identified."

The judge also found Mr Roberts-Smith had motives to lie: a financial motive to support his claim for damages, to restore his reputation, and to resist findings against him which "may affect whether further action is taken against him".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-05/roberts-smith-may-have-committed-criminal-offence-judge-finds/102441430

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955315

File: c11078bcc83bbb5⋯.jpg (4.87 MB,7500x5000,3:2,China_has_been_accused_of_….jpg)

File: 7dd28a426f66f7b⋯.jpg (2.51 MB,5041x3361,5041:3361,Chinese_ambassador_Xiao_Qi….jpg)

China lobbies press club against Tibetan appearance

Matthew Knott - June 5, 2023

The Chinese government has been accused of undermining free speech in Australia by seeking to block the head of Tibet’s government-in-exile from making a scheduled appearance at the National Press Club this month.

Officials from the Chinese embassy met with the press club’s chief executive, Maurice Reilly, in Canberra last week to convey their unhappiness about Penpa Tsering’s June 20 scheduled appearance and to ask for his invitation to be revoked.

“China expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to Australia, in disregard of China’s position and concern, allowing him to use the NPC platform to engage in separatist activities,” the embassy argued in a letter handed to Reilly.

“The Chinese side urges the Australian side to see through the nature of the Dalai clique, respect China’s core interests and major concerns, and take concrete actions to remove the negative effects so as to prevent the disruption of the sound development of China-Australia relations and media co-operation.”

Referring to Tibet by the Chinese Communist Party’s preferred name of Xizang, the letter stated: “People of all ethnic groups in the Xizang Autonomous Region endorse wholeheartedly the policies of China’s central government and the regional government … It is a fact acknowledged by unbiased people that the human rights situation in Xizang is at its best in history.”

National Press Club speeches are broadcast on the ABC and are usually attended by senior members of the Canberra press gallery.

After being approached by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age for comment, Reilly said there were no plans to cancel Penpa’s appearance, for which tickets are already for sale on the press club’s website.

Reilly said he told embassy officials the press club was “an institution for free speech, free media and public debate”.

“The meeting was cordial, but they expressed the view quite strongly that Penpa Tsering speaking at the club was offensive to China’s interests as he represents a separatist movement and would the club review the invitation,” Reilly said.

“I explained to them that the board of the National Press Club decides on who speaks at our forum and its decisions are independent of governments or other stakeholders.

“I also explained that speakers can put their views and that our media members can ask questions and challenge those views as they see fit.”

Penpa’s predecessor, Lobsang Sangay, appeared at the press club in August 2017.

The position of sikyong, or president, of Tibet’s government-in-exile was created in 2011 when the Dalai Lama decided to relinquish his formal political leadership role and hand responsibility to a democratically elected leader.

Also known as the Central Tibetan Administration, the government-in-exile is based in Dharamshala, India and includes judicial, legislative and executive branches.

Beijing fiercely resists any engagement with the body, which is not recognised as a sovereign government by any country, including Australia.

Tibetan human rights campaigner Kyinzom Dhongdue, a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile said: “This is yet another case of the Chinese government’s bullying and its efforts to undermine Australian institutions and silence its critics.

“There is no place for Chinese censorship and propaganda in Australia, especially at the National Press Club, a champion for media freedom and free speech.”

Dhongdue noted that Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian spoke at the press club last year and said: “It is only fair that the leader of the Tibetan people gets the same opportunity.

“Tibetans are all too familiar with China’s long arm of repression in Australia and globally.”

A spokesman for the Chinese embassy declined to comment.

Penpa told the US Congress in March that Tibet would “definitely die a slow death” unless the Chinese government was forced to change its current policies.

Three United Nations experts last year declared: “We are alarmed by what appears to be a policy of forced assimilation of the Tibetan identity into the dominant Han-Chinese majority, through a series of oppressive actions against Tibetan educational, religious and linguistic institutions.”

Around 1 million children of the Tibetan minority were being given a “compulsory education” curriculum in Mandarin Chinese without access to traditional or culturally relevant learning, the special rapporteurs found.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/china-lobbies-press-club-against-tibetan-appearance-20230605-p5ddz6.html

https://www.npc.org.au/speaker/2023/1183-the-hon-penpa-tsering

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955324

File: b567edec65fa2f0⋯.jpg (147.08 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Victoria_Police_have_reope….jpg)

File: cd2ff910e42572e⋯.jpg (57 KB,768x1024,3:4,Malka_Leifer_in_2006.jpg)

File: 6c2acd104ff47b0⋯.jpg (79.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,Malka_Leifer_a_former_Aust….jpg)

>>18945953

Former head of Adass Israel School board defended sending sex offender Leifer overseas without informing police

CAMERON STEWART - JUNE 4, 2023

The Adass Israel School board acted “as any normal person would act” in helping sex offender Malka Leifer flee Australia, the board’s former president once said.

Victoria Police have reopened the investigation into the actions of the board members of the ultra-orthodox Melbourne school and others who helped Leifer fly to Israel in the middle of the night in March 2008 after learning of sexual abuse allegations involving her students.

Yitzhak Benedikt, then school board president, was part of a small group who a court said hastily arranged Leifer’s departure at a meeting on March 5, 2008.

Mr Benedikt met with then school board member Meir Ernst, the late ­barrister Norman Rosenbaum, psychologist Vicki Gordon and a teacher, Sharon Bromberg.

After hearing of multiple sex allegations against the school principal, the group called her to say she had been stood down and then arranged for her to catch a flight at 1.20am that night to Israel. Mr Ernst told a court in 2016 that the decisions taken that night were “collective”.

The group did not inform Victoria Police of the allegations. Their behaviour, described in 2016 by Victorian Supreme Court judge Jack Rush as “deplorable”, allowed Leifer to escape Australian courts for 15 years.

But in late-2016, when The Australian interviewed Mr Benedikt, he strongly defended the decision to help Leifer flee the country despite a count finding that he was aware of at least eight separate allegations of sexual misconduct against her.

“We have acted as any normal person would act, we have responsibilities for our children and for our community,” Mr Benedikt said.

“We could not allow a teacher like that to stay anywhere near the children. Don’t you agree with me that the best thing is that they don’t have any more to do with the children?”

But when Mr Benedikt was asked again in 2021 about his role in helping Leifer flee Australia he claimed “I don’t remember anything”, adding that he had suffered a stroke.

Another member of the group that arranged Leifer’s departure, former school board member Mr Ernst, told the court in 2016 there was a need to stand Leifer down “as quick as possible”.

After the meeting Mr Ernst’s wife, Dassi Ernst, asked a local travel agent to open her shop at 10pm and to book an “urgent” plane ticket to Israel for Leifer. Less than four hours later, Leifer and four of her children flew to Israel. The school paid for her ticket.

“The conduct of the board is deserving of this court’s disapprobation and denunciation. I have no doubt that the conduct was deliberate,” Justice Rush said in his 2016 judgment in a civil case against the school.

“The conduct of Messrs Benedikt and Ernst on behalf of the board in facilitating the urgent departure of Leifer was likely motivated by a desire to conceal her wrongdoing and confine and isolate the conduct and its consequences to within the Adass community.”

Victoria Police last week backflipped and decided to reopen the investigation into Leifer’s departure, despite earlier ruling it out on the grounds of insufficient ­evidence. The move came after a fiery letter to Chief Commissioner Shane Patton from former premier Ted Bailleu, saying there had been “enormous disappointment across the community” by the police decision not to pursue the case.

“If a person or persons sought to pervert the course of justice, ­ignored previous allegations of sexual abuse, ignored mandatory reporting obligations, prolonged the suffering of victims by 10 years-plus, cost Victorian taxpayers millions of dollars … funded the escape of a serial sex offender and sought to cover up serious crimes, Victorians would at the very least expect a full and thorough Police Investigation,’ the letter, written by Mr Bailleu and former Victoria trade minister Philip Dalidakis, said.

The move to reopen the investigation was welcomed by one of Leifer’s victims, Dassi Erlich, who said: “It’s crucial that the board’s role is thoroughly examined and addressed to send a clear message to those that aid and abet perpetrators will not escape scrutiny.”

Ms Bromberg declined to comment, while Ms Gordon did not return messages from The Australian, and attempts to contact Mr Benedikt and Mr Ernst were unsuccessful.

In April, Leifer was found guilty of sexually assaulting Ms Erlich and her sister Elly Sapper in a trial, which had been delayed for more than a decade as the government and the sisters fought to have Leifer extradited from Israel to Melbourne to face trial.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/former-head-of-adass-israel-school-board-defended-sending-sex-offender-leifer-overseas-without-informing-police/news-story/7eeac7362dd05b86ba642aff830b8555

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18955343

File: ed15ebdad7097de⋯.jpg (207.57 KB,834x580,417:290,DN_12.jpg)

File: 6ec2ae4714c940f⋯.jpg (770.99 KB,1158x2446,579:1223,TS_1.jpg)

Devin Nunes Truth

Good morning #Australia

Glad to have you here @truthsocial

https://truthsocial.com/@DevinNunes/posts/110489377745317451

Karina Samperi @karina_samperi

Thank you @DevinNunes for finally letting #Australia join #TruthSocial. We have been waiting patiently to be let in support of the #Patriot movement that will affect #Australia

https://truthsocial.com/@karina_samperi/posts/110488831449797937

https://truthsocial.com/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960074

File: ac561cae46ec3f0⋯.jpg (97.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_and_Brittan….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Disturbed and disappointed: Brittany Higgins’ angry letter to Lisa Wilkinson

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE

Five days after Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations interview aired on The Project she wrote an angry letter to host Lisa ­Wilkinson accusing her of ­putting together a second program based on footage not used in the first, without her knowledge or consent.

Ms Higgins writes that she is “disturbed and disappointed” that after making it clear she did not want another program “you have gone ahead and put one together anyway”.

In the letter from February 20, 2021, obtained by The Australian, Ms Higgins threatens that if Wilkinson “goes ahead and still airs this material knowing how strongly I am opposed to it, then I will be forced to issue my own media statement (and this email) making clear that I wrote to you and asked you not to do it due to my fragile mental health, but you did it anyway.

“I don’t think that helps either of us.”

On Monday The Australian ­revealed Ms Higgins and Wilkinson war-gamed how to recruit prominent politicians and media figures who could help give ­momentum to their upcoming ­interview on Network 10’s The Project, as the TV host made suggestions to the former Liberal staffer about how to frame her story.

The more than five-hour ­session, which also involved Ms Higgins’ boyfriend David Sharaz and Wilkinson’s producer Angus Llewellyn, was recorded on ­January 27, 2021, a few days ­before they filmed the interview that was broadcast on February 15 ­revealing Ms Higgins’ claims that she had been raped in Parliament House.

In her letter to Wilkinson after the program aired, Ms Higgins says: “It’s so wonderful; to hear that this story has resonated with the Australian public and I’m personally so heartened by their support.”

However, the friendly tone soon disappears.

“As I discussed earlier in the week with your producer Angus when I declined his approach for a second interview, I do not want to participate in any further media interviews at this stage,” Ms Higgins writes.

“The pressure has been ­impossibly intense and there has already been severe consequences for my family, David and myself.

“While I understand that you do have the contractual rights to my original interview, I was never told at that time that you would air more than one programme detailing my assault.

“I am therefore really disturbed and disappointed that when I told Angus I did not want another interview on this matter, you would have gone ahead and put one together anyway based on footage you filmed for the initial interview but did not use.”

Ms Higgins tells Wilkinson that she is not coping and that any more attention at that point would just exacerbate her stress further.

“You have been very good to deal with to date but I feel used if more material goes to air because again, as I have said repeatedly, I do not want to appear in any further media interviews at this time,” she writes.

“I issued a statement recently about not commenting any further on this matter due to my imminent formal investigation by the AFP. This is set to occur next week and is my primary concern at the present time.”

A week later, after a further exchange between the pair, Ms Higgins writes to Wilkinson again saying that she has only just watched The Project segment, and that “I just couldn’t do it until now.”

Ms Higgins agrees with Wilkinson that “there are more details about the subsequent conversations that may be of merit”.

“As long as you don’t bring (former prime ministerial staffer) Yaron (Finkelstein) back into the piece I’m happy for you to proceed. I just don’t have any proof of his involvement and it became a major stress point with the press gallery over the past two weeks,” she says.

The Australian revealed on Monday that in their pre-interview session Ms Higgins likened Mr Finkelstein to the ruthless House of Cards character played by Kevin Spacey. “I’d liken Yaron to like, Frank Underwood from House of Cards,” she said. “He is like, he’s the PMO fixer. He is that guy.”

In her second letter to Wilkinson, Ms Higgins asks “if you would consider including something about why I came forward that would be wonderful. I’ll leave it in your hands.

“It’s your call if it’s in the public interest now.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/disturbed-and-disappointed-brittany-higgins-angry-letter-to-lisa-wilkinson/news-story/7e34ac591dd64fbb840a3f9c210d0c9a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960084

File: cad77b4594290b7⋯.jpg (112.14 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_and_Brittan….jpg)

File: c7869c777d6fd46⋯.jpg (60.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_partner_D….jpg)

File: 9a502eb58f637b1⋯.jpg (108.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Linda_Reynolds.jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Lisa Wilkinson denies briefing politicians about Brittany Higgins’ allegations

REMY VARGA - JUNE 6, 2023

Anthony Albanese referenced allegations of rape made by Brittany Higgins in question time at least 20 times in the two months after the story broke but Lisa Wilkinson denies briefing politicians to promote her interview with the former Liberal staffer.

Wilkinson on Monday said she had never spoken to any politician about the story following revelations she, Ms Higgins and Ms Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, war-gamed recruiting politicians to ask questions in question time over a five-hour brainstorming session just weeks before the story broke on February 15, 2021.

In recorded audio of the meeting on January 27, 2021, Ms Higgins told Wilkinson she could find some “friendly MPs” who could fire questions in question time.

Wilkinson told The Australian on Monday she did not approach Mr Albanese or other politicians about raising the allegations in question time. “Nor did I speak to any other politicians, their minders or apparatchiks,” she said.

Mr Albanese, then opposition leader, made reference to the allegations at least 20 times during question time in February and March 2021 while then deputy opposition leader Tanya Plibersek asked at least 14 questions about the allegations, according to The Australian’s analysis of Hansard.

Defence Minister Richard Marles, Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney, Aged Care Minister Anika Wells, Housing Minister Julie Collins, Infrastructure Minister Catherine King, Skills Minister Brendan O’Connor and Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil, in opposition, also asked questions relating to the allegations in question time. Most were directed at then prime minister Scott Morrison and concerned the allegations against former parliamentary staffer Bruce Lehrmann, the handling of Ms Higgins’ complaint and the Gaetjens inquiry, which investigated who in the office of the prime minister knew about the alleged rape, and what they knew.

Mr O’Connor denied Ms Higgins or Mr Sharaz asked him to comment. The other ministers did not respond to a request for comment before deadline.

Coalition senator Linda Reynolds, who has been subjected to sustained attacks from Labor over the alleged assault between her former staffers, said Labor had exploited the #MeToo movement as a political weapon.

“There is no doubt in my mind what happened to me in the chamber, the systematic attacks and bullying, was designed to exploit the #MeToo movement as a political weapon against the Morrison government – and it succeeded,” Senator Reynolds said. “This behaviour, which I am still subject to by Labor in the Senate, would not be acceptable in any other workplace outside of parliament.

“If we truly aspire to setting the standard nationally and encourage more women to enter parliament this behaviour has to be called out and stopped once and for all.”

Ms Higgins alleged her then colleague, Mr Lehrmann, raped her on the couch in the ministerial office of Senator Reynolds, then the boss of both, in the early hours of March 23, 2019, after a night out drinking with ­colleagues.

University of Technology Sydney Centre for Media Transition co-director Monica Attard said it wasn’t unusual for a journalist and a subject to discuss the potential impact of a story but a journalist “strategising” with a source implied a shared interest.

“Also, if a journalist ‘strategises’ with the subject of a story, there is an uncomfortable assumption that the journalist has already determined that the source’s information is correct,” she said.

“This may breach the rules around impartiality, fairness and accuracy unless research has already been done and provided cogent evidence that the subject’s story is true.”

The Australian approached Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/lisa-wilkinson-denies-briefing-politicians-about-brittany-higgins-allegations/news-story/400fa7b36b6c5e1e23cbcf0a745ec43f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960098

File: a4661428b79aa2a⋯.jpg (82.45 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Brittany_Higgins_inter….jpg)

File: 7bdfd92afd7a8da⋯.jpg (92.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_is_interv….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

The proper thing to do would be for Lisa Wilkinson to hand back her Logie

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - JUNE 6, 2023

1/2

Those who instinctively rubbish commercial TV journalism will need to check their prejudices. Seven’s Spotlight on Sunday night was impressive journalism.

Led by Mark Llewellyn, with Liam Bartlett interviewing Bruce Lehrmann, the Spotlight team explored a story of national significance, explaining it, probing it, asking hard questions. Whether we accept the former Liberal staffer’s answers is left to us to decide. This was journalism that respected the viewer.

The Project interview with Brittany Higgins that aired on February 15, 2021, was in a different category. Hard, probing questions were rare. Objectivity seemed absent. Fairness equally so. The shoddy journalism that went to air starts to make sense when you listen to the pre-interview audio conversation, obtained by The Australian, between presenter Lisa Wilkinson and Higgins. This full five-hour plus audio has never been made public, except for a 40-second grab that played in court last year and larger excerpts that featured on Spotlight. It is damning for all involved. And for fans of objective, serious journalism, there is so much to cause despair.

Not just the shameless war-gaming between Higgins, her partner David Sharaz, Wilkinson and producer Angus Llewellyn to get “friendly” MPs and journalists to keep Higgins’s version of the rape allegation and the political conspiracy to silence her going. What is equally troubling is how Wilkinson assumes the role of #MeToo maestro. The Ten Network celebrity can be heard helping Higgins frame her story, suggesting angles, and words, and making nasty and uncorroborated judgments about Higgins’s former boss, former defence minister Linda Reynolds, and Reynolds’s chief of staff, Fiona Brown, women whom Higgins maligns as villains in her own version of events.

For example, Wilkinson prattles on about a Twitter spat she had with Reynolds. So much so that she searches for the exchange on her phone, reads it out, commends herself for recalling this exchange. When Wilkinson described Reynolds as an “idiot”, the venom was palpable.

The same lack of professionalism is shown towards Brown. Higgins’s version of Brown and Reynolds as workplace villains who wanted to hide a rape for political purposes was, we now know, false yet was met with little curiosity from Wilkinson.

Wilkinson says she doesn’t want to put words in Higgins’s mouth before suggesting what she could say: “… speak about the culture that, you know, I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but if you can enunciate the fact that this place is all about suppression of people’s natural sense of justice. Because you see around you the way that this place works.”

That is what Higgins does during The Project interview they recorded a week later. In fact, you might get sloshed if you downed a shot of vodka every time there was a word match between Wilkinson’s off-camera suggestions and Higgins’s eventual on-camera answers.

Here is Wilkinson again, playing apparent #MeToo director.

Lisa: And we’ve come a long way, if you look at the history of the world, we’ve come a long way in a very short space of time. But we can’t stop. And this is, like, if you were a bloke, you wouldn’t be getting this treatment.

Brittany: No, not at all.

Lisa: We must get that point across. Because that whole thing of what an incredibly safe place it is to rape someone. I mean it looks like intent.

Sure enough, when Higgins is filmed for the final interview, she says: “I just couldn’t live with myself if it happened to someone else.” The 61-year-old woman appears to be leading a woman in her 20s by the nose down the darkest alleys of #MeToo. “You’re doing something magnificent,” says Wilkinson. “So, it changes the culture there and it desperately needs changing. I’ll say it again, it’s a sick culture.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960104

File: e8f2b358d757a8f⋯.jpg (98.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_trial_delay….jpg)

File: 7a04395e50f26b3⋯.jpg (89.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,Screen_grabs_from_Seven_s_….jpg)

>>18960098

2/2

Can’t Wilkinson see it is magnificent only if Higgins is telling the truth? If it’s not true, wicked is a more apt description. And Wilkinson cannot possibly know Higgins is telling the truth. No one knows what happened that night. There are two versions. There is an allegation. And there is a presumption of innocence. These aren’t nuances. These are fundamental elements to a democracy. Nuance appears to be tossed aside by Wilkinson.

Lisa: Because you’re taking back ownership of your story and what happened to you to make sure that it can’t happen to others. And it changes the culture as much as is possible. Because you’re also riding on the back of the Four Corners story, as you know.

Brittany: Yep, yep.

Lisa: And that makes it so much more powerful than if it was standing out there on its own. It’s like the MeToo movement, it’s because women linked arms and rushed forward that all of a sudden the individual stories no longer got shouted down. It became, well, this is everywhere.

When Wilkinson talks about Canberra having its “own set of rules” during the five-hour conversation, that too is repeated by Higgins on air. Wilkinson even suggests Higgins take a sick day on her last day at work – the Friday before The Project airs.

I can think of a zillion other things I’d rather do on a Sunday than listen to Wilkinson play the role of therapist, coach and #MeToo conductor to Higgins. Yet it was a riveting masterclass that captures what happens when the believe-all-women mantra appears to take hold of a journalist. Believe all women, another way of saying men are guilty, is an inherently and hopelessly flawed starting premise for any objective journalist.

The five hours of audio between Wilkinson and Higgins, with Sharaz and Llewellyn too, ought to be played in journalism courses across the country. And played twice to any student who fails a first-year subject.

Any good journalist learns to build rapport and establish trust with the person they want to interview. Wilkinson appears to go way beyond that as she lectures Higgins that “it’s about fear, it’s about intimidation, it’s sexist, it’s, everything is implied, everything’s in secret and that’s, everything seems to operate in dark shadows, because the minute you shine a torch on any of it, it’s as ugly as sin”.

The torch has turned on the Ten celebrity to reveal someone who appears hellbent on launching a #MeToo juggernaut, maybe picking up an award here and there, with a large side-serving of political partisanship, nasty invective about women and gratuitous snide gossip. What’s lacking is a sober, objective and fair search for truth. The proper thing to do would be for Wilkinson to hand in her Logie for her Higgins interview. That interview has been nothing but trouble for her, for the justice system, for good journalism and for people who deserved to be treated better.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/spotlight-falls-on-to-metoo-juggernaut/news-story/29a383bf0db64162d8a2aff14dea1b9e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960113

File: 50a3fc0d8d58084⋯.jpg (102.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18955149

Anthony Albanese’s decision to make no effort to attract Coalition support for Indigenous voice to parliament is backfiring

DENNIS SHANAHAN - JUNE 6, 2023

The latest Newspoll figures suggest two of Anthony Albanese’s key strategies in his bid to pass the referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament – to avoid giving detail and to eschew bipartisan support – are failing.

There are still months of the campaign for a voice to run but the immediate reaction to the referendum question passing through the House of Representatives is bad for the Prime Minister’s cause.

The latest Newspoll figures, which it must be said respond to a different question to the previous referendum polling questions, suggest there is an across-the-board movement against the voice and a surge in uncertainty.

The movement against the voice to parliament and the executive government is strongest among older Australians and Coalition supporters.

But there is a move away from the voice since the end of April in all categories and, among the most sympathetic groups of Greens voters, women and the young, there is a jump in uncertainty as they join the “don’t knows”.

Since April, support among Coalition voters for the voice dropped from 39 to 28 per cent, ALP supporters dropped from 72 to 63 per cent and even Greens dropped from 79 to 71 per cent.

But “don’t know” among ALP supporters jumped from 8 to 13 per cent and doubled among Greens voters from 7 to 14 per cent.

Sympathy among women voters, those who are university educated and the young is bleeding into the “don’t knows”.

This increases the power of the No campaign’s “if you don’t know vote no” and underscores people’s need for information. It also signals what could be a stepping stone effect where voters don’t switch directly from one side to another but take a stepping stone – such as an independent candidate – on the way to complete change.

Albanese has deliberately avoided supplying detail as he tried to avoid the difficulty of the Republican referendum which failed because of splits over a preferred model and concerns about the impact of the change. Perhaps Albanese’s use of more radical language about the voice is designed to draw back those sliding Greens and young voters but that only exacerbates the problem of trying to attract Coalition supporters and older Australians who are concerned it is too radical.

Between April and June there was a fall from 39 to 30 per cent for the voice among those aged over 65 and a rise in the No vote from 58 to 61 per cent as well as a tripling of the don’t knows from 3 per cent to 9 per cent.

So, the strongest movement against the voice is among Coalition supporters and yet Albanese has made no real effort to attract Coalition support through any compromise during the referendum process because of his belief the world has changed and community groups and business carry more weight than politicians.

As well, the PM was banking on the underlying political ploy of blaming Peter Dutton if the referendum fails and dismiss him and the Coalition as irrelevant if it passes. If the referendum does fail and it is seen that it is Albanese’s strategy that excluded a good third of the voting population and allowed a creeping uncertainty to erode the positive support of Labor, Greens and young voters it will be clear where the responsibility rests.

These latest Newspoll numbers are not a direct comparison but with all polling showing the same trends in dwindling support for the voice to parliament no one with any feeling for success of the referendum could be confident of sticking to the two grand strategies.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/albanese-voice-strategy-is-failing/news-story/cf9b2e19ead21073902c7caa6f551c68

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960120

File: c4109fa7c29c6c4⋯.jpg (110.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,NSW_premier_Chris_Minns_an….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18955149

State premiers ‘important’ to Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaign, referendum

ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - JUNE 5, 2023

The Albanese government is banking on the country’s premiers playing a crucial role in getting the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum across the line, hoping the state leaders’ popularity in states like South Australia and NSW will help clinch a Yes vote.

As the Yes23 campaign prepares to ramp up its grassroots strategy from July 1 and rapidly increase its volunteer network of more than 7000 people, government sources said the importance of premiers – all of whom support the referendum – should not be underestimated in the debate.

While Queensland is considered the weakest link for the Yes camp, Labor insiders were hopeful Chris Minns in NSW, Peter Malinauskas in SA and the country’s only Liberal premier, Jeremy Rockliff in Tasmania, would be ­influential campaigners.

There were also expectations new WA premier Roger Cook would enjoy a honeymoon period in the lead-up to the referendum. Anthony Albanese will play the most prominent role of politicians involved in the Yes campaign.

Mr Malinauskas said he would campaign for the voice in every forum he could and would not be a politician who sat on the fence while Australia had an important national discussion.

“I’m proud of the fact that South Australia has already led the nation by legislating a First Nations voice,” he said. “It should be a demonstration to all that we have nothing to lose as a society, but everything to gain from giving our First Nations people the ability to speak directly to decision makers about the matters that affect their lives.”

Victorian Premier Daniel ­Andrews said the voice should not be controversial or feared, declaring he could not see “any downside whatsoever”.

“We can pay the price of failure. Whether you vote No or Yes, whether you’re leaning one way or the other, we are spending billions of dollars to fail. Let’s try something different,” he said.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney will campaign across Western Australia soon and on Monday night called on “all the WA mob out there” to advocate for the voice, after an exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian found less than half of ­eligible Australians would vote Yes at the referendum.

“I want to give a special shout out to all the WA mob out there. You’ve got a big job helping me with this referendum. A big job. And tonight I’m pleased to say that soon I will be joining you by crisscrossing WA for a whole week,” Ms Burney told the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies summit in Perth.

“I’ll be listening to and talking with communities about the voice referendum – from Kununurra to Claremont, from Perth to the Pilbara – I’ll be there with you, having conversations with everyone about why we need a voice.”

The Newspoll, which was the first to present voters with the precise question they’ll be asked at the ballot box, found opinion on the voice was almost equally divided. Forty-six per cent of voters said they would vote Yes, 43 per cent of voters said they would vote No, and 11 per cent were undecided.

Women, young people and city-based university-educated Australians were more likely to vote Yes, while over 50s in the regions who didn’t go to university were the strongest opponents.

Nationals leader David Littleproud pleaded with the Prime Minister to separate constitutional recognition from establishing a voice in the nation’s birth certificate, accusing him of choosing a model that will divide the country.

“To intertwine another layer of bureaucracy (by creating a voice), one in which he won’t even provide the details, that’s showing to be divisive,” Mr Littleproud told Sky News.

Asked in what form Mr Littleproud thought constitutional recognition could be best achieved, he said a constitutional convention was required to determine if a preamble or new chapter would be more successful.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/state-premiers-important-to-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-yes-campaign-referendum/news-story/d5d9a18c453c938562dab00d03551a15

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960127

File: e19e317567ee247⋯.jpg (75.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

>>18928670

Indigenous voice to parliament doesn’t guarantee it will help Indigenous Australians

ANTHONY DILLON - JUNE 6, 2023

Perhaps the most important question in the lead-up to the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum is not whether modifications to the Constitution are legally sound, but will such modifications contribute to helping Indigenous Australians in any practical way?

Any proposed modifications should be legally sound, but such soundness does not guarantee the voice will help Indigenous people.

Many are convinced the voice will help Indigenous Australians in practical ways. Not so long ago Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney was reported as saying the voice, if we had it, would have prevented recent problems in Alice Springs from escalating to the crisis it became.

I am not convinced a constitutionally enshrined body can help those Indigenous people who need the most help, any more than the legions of Indigenous people currently working for government can. In fact, I think it can be harmful to them.

It sends the poisonous message to Indigenous Australians who suffer needlessly that their salvation lies in the voice and they are powerless to make any positive change in their lives, now or ever, through their own efforts or from receiving the help offered to them.

This is reminiscent of the claims in the past that Indigenous people would be so much better off if an Indigenous person were minister for Indigenous affairs because apparently only Indigenous people could fully understand Indigenous people. Two Indigenous ministers, whose commitment in Indigenous affairs is beyond question, have shown this to be false.

But it seems many are convinced the voice will be of practical help. Otherwise, the idea of this referendum would have been dismissed a long time ago. For those who believe the voice will contribute to improving the health and wellbeing of those Indigenous Australians who suffer the most, then perhaps the next most important question is: How? I have yet to hear a cogent explanation, but I am open to hearing one.

In the absence of a strong argument for how the voice will help Indigenous Australians, I think it is important to understand why so many Australians are intending to vote yes, and why so many corporate and sporting organisations, plus at least one Bar association, are proclaiming they are Yes voters. I offer three reasons.

First, for those who wish to feel like they have contributed to helping Indigenous Australians, then ticking Yes on referendum day is an easy way to do it. Due to the enormous goodwill Australians have towards their Indigenous brothers and sisters, many have the strong desire to do something, but are often unsure of what to do.

Voting Yes doesn’t require donating money, visiting remote communities, acknowledging unpleasant truths or doing hard work. The voice, they are told, will fix the problems facing Indigenous Australians. But with no clear plan of how it will work to help Indigenous Australians, shouldn’t concerned Aussies be sceptical? Surely knowing the Indigenous architects and many other Indigenous Australians are doing well without the voice should be proof positive the voice is not needed. Shouldn’t we instead be asking how successful Indigenous Australians have attained success?

Second, when something is repeated often enough, people often start to believe it, even if they once didn’t. Psychologists call this “illusory of truth”. It can be confronting to realise psychologists are needed to tell us what common sense already tells us. Australians have heard often enough that the voice is exactly what Indigenous Australians need. It has become ingrained in the minds of many.

Third, voice proponents are appealing strongly to emotion. I am not saying emotion should never play a part in decision-making, but it should be led by rational reasoning. We are seeing what American psychologist Jonathan Haidt has called “the emotional tail wags the rational dog”.

Anthony Albanese wrote in this paper about the voice, relating it to the 1967 referendum, Freedom Rides, Mabo, Wik and the Redfern Speech. Get it? Vote Yes, and you will be on the “right side of history”. Doesn’t that give you goosebumps? Who would want to carry the guilt resulting from voting No to the voice, which the Prime Minister has described as a “gracious and modest request”?

Each of us must make a decision. When at the booth, just ask yourself “How will the voice help those Indigenous Australians who need the most help?” before you vote.

Anthony Dillon is an honorary fellow in the faculty of health sciences at the Australian Catholic University and identifies as a part-Indigenous Australian.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/voice-sends-a-poisonous-message-of-powerlessness/news-story/33a1b8a3fb8809e51b670579a422bb41

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960157

File: c94af8714052312⋯.jpg (238.51 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_Navy_ship_at_HMAS_Kuttab….jpg)

Anthony Albanese is expected to face pressure over the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal at national conference in August

SARAH ISON - JUNE 5, 2023

Anthony Albanese’s support for AUKUS is expected to come under fire at Labor’s national conference in August, highlighting division within the ALP over the government’s national security agenda.

Right and Left faction sources say the government’s backing of AUKUS will likely be debated at the conference, where union and Labor member representatives will meet in Brisbane and vote on the party platform that will bind the government if it is re-elected.

Right faction delegates are preparing to counter an expected resolution from left-wing unions condemning the government’s support of the agreement.

A stoush over AUKUS would be leapt on by Peter Dutton ahead of the next election, with senior government members likely to lobby AUKUS opponents against going public with their concerns.

At the Queensland state conference on the weekend, the Electrical Trades Union moved a motion asking the branch to “categorically oppose the construction of nuclear-powered submarines” for the safety of constituents and the broader environment.

“The recent disappointing and reckless decision on behalf of the Albanese federal government to rubberstamp the Morrison governments flawed and massively expensive AUKUS arrangements, means we need urgent ­action to ensure Queensland’s proud antinuclear stance is not only maintained but also ­enhanced,” the motion, put forward by ETU organiser Jimmy Little and seconded by state secretary Peter Ong, said.

“We can make a difference and ensure we continue to live in a state that rejects the use of ­nuclear power as a source of ­energy by also ensuring we do not expose the people of this state to its toxic legacy through military use.”

In response, the Australian Workers Union-Right, known as Labor Forum, tabled a counter motion “congratulating” the ­government for its AUKUS investment, which was ultimately voted down 229 to 140.

On Monday, a union source said: “What you’ve seen now is in Queensland, which used to be a Right stronghold, the Left have taken over and put up these … ­motions that tarnish the reputation of the Prime Minister.

“AUKUS and antinuclear motions will come up at every conference.

“Prominent people in the right will be obviously putting counter motions up. But the problem for the Prime Minister is when it gets to the national conference. That's the national stage.”

Labor has faced backlash from unions over AUKUS since coming into government, with an ­alliance including the Australian Manufacturers Workers Union, ETU and Australian Workers Union raising their concerns publicly in February.

In a report in February, the Australian Shipbuilding Federation of Unions called AUKUS “the latest blow to our industry”, urging the government to build conventionally powered submarines onshore before turning to the purchase of nuclear-powered vessels from overseas.

ACTU president Michele O’Neil in March told the National Press Club that the ACTU backed a “nuclear-free defence policy”.

“The ACTU has a longstanding policy of opposition to nuclear power, nuclear waste and proliferation,” she said.

The ACTU said it had not changed its view on AUKUS, but would not be pursuing the matter further at national conference or elsewhere.

Labor elder statesmen Paul Keating has been a vocal ­opponent of the AUKUS deal chiefly because of its potential to undermine Australia’s sovereignty.

Questions on AUKUS were raised during a Labor caucus meeting in March, with members seeking assurances on issues ­including workers not being taken from other industries to fill the demands of the project.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-is-expected-to-face-pressure-over-the-aukus-nuclear-submarine-deal-at-national-conference-in-august/news-story/67f1500a878d67166598fe74c2aebd85

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960171

File: 67f8ad83734fc94⋯.jpg (109.13 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>18945189

>>18945286

>>18949874

Xi Jinping’s message to the world: mind your own business

PAUL MONK - JUNE 6, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese acquitted himself with great dignity at the recent Shangri-la Dialogue in Singapore. He spoke fluently and without notes and rather eloquently articulated the case for a liberal rules-based international order and the need for collective security. He was clear and statesmanlike in his observations about what made for peace, stability and prosperity, and what could disrupt them. His problem and ours is that Xi Jinping does not see things that way.

The Prime Minister made no barbed accusations and described Australia as seeking to be a force for dialogue and for neighbourhood stability, but he stated plainly that we stood by our long alliance with the US and were acquiring nuclear-powered submarines as part of a commitment to deterrence and reassurance within the Indo-Pacific. Those words were clearly directed at Beijing.

When he spoke of the danger of any power taking unilateral action to alter the status quo by force, it was manifest that he was talking of China, though he made passing reference to North Korea. He underlined this by adding: “whether in the Taiwan Strait, the East China Sea, the South China Sea or elsewhere”. The elsewhere might have meant the Korean Peninsula, but it just as easily could have meant the contested borderlands with India.

As if to impress on his actual and primary audiences where Australia stood on all these matters, he added that “American leadership” had been “indispensable” to building and maintaining the peace, stability and free trade that had been the preconditions for Asia becoming, since World War II, and China since the death of Mao Zedong, such a fast growing and prospering part of the world – indeed, “the engine of the global economy”.

There is, of course, a body of opinion, here and in China, that openly holds that China is the rising and “natural” hegemon in Asia, that the US is in relative and even absolute decline, that it should yield East Asia to China, withdrawing gracefully rather than risk a war that it would likely lose, and that Australia has erred in joining AUKUS and contracting to purchase nuclear-powered sub­marines from its Anglo-American allies.

Albanese was holding the line on the clear foreign and security policy that his government has followed from day one, a year ago.

Though his address only hinted at this, the principles he spelled out concerning dialogue and collective security, guardrails and rules of the road are what the Chinese Communist Party is putting at risk and, in fact, openly challenging. The subtext, therefore, of the Prime Minister’s address was an appeal to Beijing to accept that it should not use force to unilaterally alter the status quo, that it should abide by agreed rules of liberal world order and that it should not use economic coercion in an attempt to subordinate smaller states to itself – as it has been doing.

Now, if we suppose that Xi and his politburo and central military commission understand that they have been pushing the envelope and, on reflection, concur with the Prime Minister’s desiderata and his observations about world order, all this would be reassuring. And they might well have so reflected, if what they wanted was a peaceful evolution of the existing world order, adjusted for its growing wealth.

Alas, that is not how things are viewed in Beijing. For more than 30 years the grand strategy of the National Leninists who rule China has been to displace the US and become the dominant power first in Asia and then globally. This is coming to head under Xi, as he has made explicit. Therein lies our problem. Understand that as the problem, and Albanese’s observations and hopes become more problematic.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960172

File: 6e2b304d4412cf8⋯.jpg (130.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,China_s_Defence_Minister_L….jpg)

>>18960171

2/2

The grand strategy we are facing is pinned to the retention and propagation of autocratic politics, which is why the term National Leninists is appropriate. Beijing’s goal is to detach us from our alli­ances, to displace the US in Asia and to subject Taiwan to its dominion, as it has Hong Kong. All this was underscored when, later in the day at the Shangri-la, Chinese Defence Minister Li Shangfu bluntly told those present that, when it came to China’s territorial and maritime claims, others should “mind their own business”.

There’s the rub. While Albanese talks of dialogue and describes the putative role of our future submarine capability, there is a real and present danger that Beijing will keep pushing to overturn the existing order.

There are indications that the balance of this decade will be critical in military terms – and we are insufficiently prepared for what would happen if push comes to shove. It could do so within the next five years. Xi is deadly serious and does not live in Shangri-la.

Paul Monk is former head of the China desk in the Defence Intelligence Organisation and a fellow of the Institute for Law and Strategy (London and New York). A new and updated edition of his 2005 book Thunder from the Silent Zone: Rethinking China has just been published.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/xi-jinpings-message-to-the-world-mind-your-own-business/news-story/69a5216e9dd8900060a1ac291535691e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960196

File: e9df78a9e48c96f⋯.jpg (143.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Daniel_Andrews_speech_at_M….jpg)

File: 0a4d2d479971d73⋯.jpg (64.63 KB,1024x768,4:3,Former_Trade_Minister_Andr….jpg)

File: bf79b64e604b880⋯.jpg (85.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,Liberal_MP_James_Paterson_….jpg)

Daniel Andrews’ speech at Melbourne pro-China forum a mystery as reporters barred from event

Premier Daniel Andrews’ address to a secretive China forum which barred Melbourne media remains blacked out, in a move branded “highly irregular”.

Patrick Carlyon, Mitch Clarke and Carly Douglas - June 6, 2023

1/2

Premier Daniel Andrews delivered his speech, on behalf of Victoria, to the Post Pandemic China-Australia Economic Cooperation Forum on Monday night.

But in a move described as “highly irregular”, those Victorians for whom Mr Andrews spoke cannot hear what he did or did not say.

The Herald Sun turned up to the forum, at the Park Hyatt, tape recorder in hand.

And was turned away from the super secretive talkfest ostensibly about navigating Chinese trade markets and opportunities.

It appears that the Herald Sun, along with all Australian media, was left off the invitation list.

A lady at the front desk said Chinese media only.

Signs outside the function room warned guests not to take photos or videos inside.

Lord Mayor Sally Capp was in attendance, while former Trade Minister Andrew Robb delivered a speech.

“It was an important event,” Mr Andrews said on Tuesday.

“I certainly made the point that the China and Victoria partnership is critically important to jobs, to exports, to international education, to food and wine and every sector really.

“They are our biggest trading partner. If you’ve got a bad relationship with your biggest customer, your business has got real problems.”

Mr Andrews, who recently visited China without media, said he had “no idea” why local media was banned from attending the event.

The forum has been shrouded in mystery since the Herald Sun asked Mr Andrews’ office if he was speaking at it — then waited a week to receive confirmation that he was.

Opposition Leader John Pesutto said it wasn’t acceptable for the Premier to be delivering secret speeches.

“This is not IBAC where he gets to make his comments in secret. These are speeches that he’s making on behalf of the Victorian people,” he said.

“No political leader, whether it’s Daniel Andrews or myself, should expect to be able to give speeches in secret.

“It’s just not the way we operate in Victoria.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960203

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18960196

2/2

Last week, Victorian Liberal MP James Paterson cited the Herald Sun to use Senate estimates to raise concerns about a forum sponsor, China Institute for Innovation and Development Strategy (CIIDS).

He called it a “front group” for China’s top spy agency, the Ministry of State Security (MSS).

“As a matter of principle, is it appropriate for a MSS front group to be involved in organising a conference in Australia?” he asked.

Mr Andrews was unable to confirm whether his speech would be publicly released saying he has spoken from basic notes.

On Tuesday, Senator Paterson said it was “highly irregular and inappropriate for a Premier to give a speech in Victoria and bar the media from attending”.

“What does Daniel Andrews have to hide?” he asked.

“What did he say that he doesn’t want Victorians to hear?

The premier’s latest display of apathy for the media comes as he halts print advertising in the Herald Sun and The Age.

That strategy has raised fears that Victorians will miss out on vital information such as campaigns to reduce the road toll, bushfire safety initiatives and public health alerts.

In a promotional video for the China forum, multinational law firm Pinsent Masons’, Andrew Fisken, told listeners post-pandemic China offers “a host of new opportunities from selling products and services into the Chinese market to leveraging Chinese technology and capital”.

“To hear leading experts from China and Australia provide their views on these topics and hear how you can leverage these opportunities to develop your business,” he said.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/daniel-andrews-speech-at-melbourne-prochina-forum-a-mystery-as-reporters-barred-from-event/news-story/67024596976dc3f8dd997608c99b904f

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZj94-BQ6os

https://www.cccaau.org/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960215

File: 57a4a51027ade5d⋯.jpg (193.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,SAS_Corporal_Ben_Roberts_S….jpg)

File: fd7d61bb0d6b172⋯.jpg (159.04 KB,1279x720,1279:720,SAS_troopers_on_long_range….jpg)

>>18934029

Going woke risks destroying the ADF as a real fighting force

GREG SHERIDAN - JUNE 6, 2023

1/2

The combined tragedies of the behaviour uncovered in the Brereton report and the defamation court findings against Victoria Cross winner Ben Roberts-Smith will be further compounded if they lead to a weakening of the military capability of the Australian Army, or its special forces, the SAS and the Commandos.

We all ought to remember that so far nothing has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal court. Inquiries, even defamation cases, can produce headlines and strange findings. That is not to dispute this defamation ruling, merely to note it’s not a criminal conviction.

Nonetheless, the evidence that some Australian soldiers may have killed civilians, killed prisoners or directed that they be killed is substantial. This is certainly a grave matter. Any Australian soldier is bound by the special laws of war and the general laws of morality. In World War II, Adolf Hitler ordered that any allied SAS member who was captured should be executed. This was rightly regarded by the allies as murder.

However, it would be a folly on top of a tragedy if we now went crazy in response, tarring all members of a unit with the crimes of a few, or instituting reforms that make our already incoherent defence force even less capable of combat than it is now.

As I’ve written before, the SAS was grossly overused in Afghanistan. This contributed to the poor judgment of some of its soldiers. It arose from the overwhelming desire of the defence establishment, and the governments it served, that the ADF should never go into combat or even be capable of combat.

Since the Vietnam War, Australia has been involved in lots of deployments. But their purpose has been to show the Americans we are good allies, not actually to achieve any military effect, certainly not any strategic effect.

We’ve sent ships and planes to the Middle East, but only to theatres where the Americans have complete dominance.

We have used some of the most sophisticated planes in the world to bomb terrorists in environments where the Americans have complete air superiority and control. This is not to diminish the service of our military personnel. They do the jobs they are given and all military jobs involve risk.

Very few countries in the world spend more money on their defence force for less military effect than Australia does. The only part of our entire ADF that we readily put into combat are the special forces, especially the SAS.

The SAS always wants to serve. The very definition of a special forces soldier is that he has a bias to action and an internal locus of control. He wants to act, and believes he can master any situation he’s given. It’s too easy for others therefore to leave the job to the SAS. They get things done and can take care of themselves, so there won’t be heavy casualties.

That appeals to Canberra. The way successive governments, starting with the Howard gov­ernment, used the army in Afghanis­tan and Iraq was an insult to the army. It was as if Canberra believed the army incapable of combat.

Jim Molan, a magnificent man and soldier, argued that Australia should take overall responsibility for an entire province in Afghanistan. This would have been a strategic contribution. It would necessarily have involved more units of the army meeting insurgents and terrorists in combat. No government in Canberra would do that because we never wanted to have a strategic effect. Or, rather, we didn’t ever desire to have a military strategic effect. The strategic effect we hoped for was to show the Americans we were good allies. In that case we shouldn’t have been there at all.

Don’t get me wrong. No one could be more in favour of our paying our alliance dues than me. But we should deploy military forces in combat for military, not diplomatic, purposes. This besetting, crippling mentality of learned helplessness blights our military in every dimension right up until today. We will do tough policing work in the South Pacific, search and rescue, disaster relief, and we’ll join the Americans in combat if they provide a benign environment for us. But we won’t join them in attempting to have any strategic impact of our own through combat or even deterrence. You can see this learned helplessness in the way all the big military decisions were deferred in the Defence Strategic Review.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960218

File: 30c6ad1952c7dc5⋯.jpg (119.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: f3fec1c5a495d59⋯.jpg (134.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Then_Minister_for_Defence_….jpg)

>>18960215

2/2

Not only was the SAS used to the exclusion of the regular army in Afghanistan, it was used for tasks that were not special forces tasks. Using signals intelligence to find and hunt high-priority targets is a special forces task. Pounding the ground is not.

There are two iron laws of defence that will play out in this controversy. One law is that no matter how badly defence performs in producing capabilities, no senior civilian ever suffers a career reversal or takes any responsibility. Failures happen apparently by magic.

The corollary is that with any military problem, the only people punished are junior soldiers, the lower the rank, the more likely the punishment. The Chief of the Defence Force, Angus Campbell, who has played his part in our equipment hopelessness, was for a time the Australian commander in Afghanistan. He had responsibility for his command. There’s not the slightest chance he’ll be giving back any medals.

The government is now pushing a great deal of politically correct nonsense on the army. It has restored the rainbow morning teas. It rejoices in its membership of LGBTQ lobby groups. Diversity, equity and inclusion are all the rage. Recruitment advertisements make no mention of combat or what a life of service in the army is really all about. I am strongly in favour of diversity in the army and the ADF. But diversity should work this way: you encourage people from widely diverse backgrounds to apply, but then the selection and promotion procedures should be absolutely colourblind and gender-blind.

We forget what the army is for. The key role of the army is to close with and destroy the enemy. You hope you never need to do that, but that’s what you have a military for. The Australian Army, like many Western armies, is now subject to a bewildering range of woke requirements that have nothing to do with being an effective army, nor indeed with being an ethical and moral military either. Given the emphasis on teamwork and group cohesion, this kind of poison can spread through a military at devastating speed.

The Brereton report was wrong to disparage the idea of soldiers as warriors. This self-image has traditionally been at the heart of the US military, the most effective in the world. Effective soldiers believe they are warriors for one reason – that’s what they are. The tragedies recently revealed ought to make senior commanders and politicians reflect on the irresponsible and mistaken nature of their previous policies. Think that’s likely? They shouldn’t be used to ruin the one bit of the ADF we’ve been willing to deploy in combat, or to make our small, gravely undergunned and incoherently structured military even less combat effective than it already is.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/tragedy-of-afghanistan-originates-in-poor-decisionmaking-atthe-top/news-story/22f1b554009a965122379a8ce3c4d721

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960235

File: c2a2e33bd376858⋯.jpg (88.16 KB,910x568,455:284,An_Australian_soldier_show….jpg)

>>18946058

US Marines to join allied troops in Australia for combined force exercise

SETH ROBSON, STARS AND STRIPES - June 6, 2023

U.S. Marines in Australia will kick off a month of field training alongside Australian and Japanese troops next week, a precursor to one of the largest military exercises in the Pacific the following month.

The exercise, Southern Jackaroo, is taking place between June 15 and mid-July, Maj. Matthew Wolf, a spokesman for Marine Rotational Force — Darwin, said by phone Tuesday.

“Combined and integrated force elements with our allies demonstrate our commitment to a safe and secure region,” Australian army Brigadier Michael Say, commander of the Brisbane-based 7th Brigade, tweeted on May 27.

Three days later, he tweeted a video of Australian soldiers towing M-777 howitzers in preparation for the drills.

U.S. and Australian officials did not provide details of the number of troops or units participating in the exercise Tuesday.

A Japan Ground Self-Defense Force spokesman declined by phone to release information about its involvement with the exercise since it is still being coordinated. Japanese government officials often speak to the media on condition of anonymity.

Last year, 700 troops from all three nations participated in Southern Jackeroo, held each year since 2015.

Japan and Australia have developed amphibious forces akin to the U.S. Marines in recent years.

In October, Japan and Australia signed a reciprocal access agreement that set the foundation for regular military exchanges on one another’s territory.

The three nations’ amphibious forces may find themselves working together on anything from disaster response to intense combat, according to Ross Babbage, a former Australian assistant defense secretary.

“Relevant forces of the three countries gain a lot from working together and sharing lessons,” he said in an email Monday. “There are no downsides.”

Next month, all three nations will participate in Talisman Sabre, a biennial exercise in Australia that’s scheduled to draw approximately 30,000 personnel.

Talisman Sabre this year is scheduled from July 22 to Aug. 4 with troops from the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, France, New Zealand, South Korea, Indonesia, Fiji, Tonga and Papua New Guinea. Personnel from the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand will observe, the Australian government said in April.

https://www.stripes.com/branches/marine_corps/2023-06-06/marines-australia-japan-southern-jackaroo-10348481.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18960257

File: 65fa8db86216625⋯.jpg (2.8 MB,3957x2989,3957:2989,Ukraine_wants_Australian_m….jpg)

File: 5e6e965ded4dece⋯.jpg (3.16 MB,5511x3666,1837:1222,Australian_made_Bushmaster….jpg)

>>18949906

Hawkei armoured cars bound for Ukraine war in Australian support deal

Peter Hartcher - June 6, 2023

Australia is set to give Ukraine the missile-capable, four-wheel-drive armoured cars that it has been requesting for months – the Hawkei – as the centrepiece of a forthcoming support package.

Although a formal commitment has yet to be sealed, there has been serious progress informally and Ukrainian Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov told the Herald and The Age the vehicles were number one on his list of “demands” from Australia.

He described the Australian-made vehicles as “very, very famous armed vehicles with air defence systems” in an interview in Singapore after meeting his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, at the weekend.

The Hawkei is a seven-tonne armoured car designed to be fitted with the same Norwegian-American air defence system that protects the White House.

Marles declined to comment specifically on the Hawkei but said the Ukrainians “have given us a list; we had a pretty detailed conversation”. The new support package would be unveiled “soon”, he said.

The announcement is expected by the time Prime Minister Anthony Albanese travels to a NATO summit in Lithuania next month.

People with knowledge of the talks but not authorised to speak publicly said an understanding had been reached but the deal was yet to be processed through Canberra’s formal systems.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said that he was ready to launch the country’s much-anticipated counteroffensive but worried that Russia had air superiority on the front lines.

A lack of protection from Russian air power meant “a large number of soldiers will die” in the counteroffensive, he told the Wall Street Journal in a weekend interview. Ukraine would have liked to have more Western-supplied weapons for the coming campaign, he said. “We would like to have certain things, but we can’t wait for months.”

Reznikov, Zelensky’s defence minister, told the Herald and The Age in an interview in Singapore at the Shangri-La Dialogue: “For us, air defence systems is priority number one. Different levels, short range, middle range, etc. That’s why we are wondering for the Hawkei. We will be happy to get it.”

Reznikov was full of praise for the performance of the Bushmaster armoured troop carriers supplied by Australia, which he said had been critical in Ukraine’s ability to recover the city of Kharkiv from Russian forces.

“It was surprise for Russians. Honestly, it was surprise for me, also.”

Among Ukraine’s other requests, Reznikov said he had asked that Australia join the so-called “birds coalition” to support its use of F-16 fighter jets that NATO nations are supplying. He said Ukraine needed training for its pilots as well as technicians and sustainment support. He had requested Australian personnel and cash.

Australia’s army has 1100 Hawkeis, recently delivered or in the process of being delivered. Some already are deployed in South Australia and trialling the National Advanced Surface to Air Missile System (NASAM), said retired Australian Army major general Mick Ryan.

“The NASAM comes with a whole suite of very sophisticated sensors and missiles,” Ryan said. “It’s not just a missile system – it has a pretty powerful radar that over 100 kilometres could be quite useful.”

The Australian Army has raised serial objections to supplying the Hawkei. It first said its brakes were faulty. Next it said that so many spare parts would need to be supplied to Ukraine that the whole fleet would be unusable.

Liberal senator David Van, the chair of the parliamentary Friends of Ukraine group, said it was “complete bollocks” that the vehicles could not be sent to Ukraine.

“There are 450 Hawkeis sitting in the Thales compound in Bendigo. Why won’t we send them?”

The Ukrainian Defence Ministry has said that it does not care about any braking problems.

Ryan said of the situation: “I think it’s more Canberra risk aversion – Defence doesn’t want to be embarrassed if there’s a problem with the brakes. The Hawkei’s already in use in Adelaide. If it’s good enough for the Australians it’d be good enough for the Ukrainians.”

The Ukrainian Defence Ministry has said that the Hawkei was its troops’ “new crush”.

The vehicle takes its name from a species of death adder which, in turn, was named in honour of former prime minister Bob Hawke.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/hawkei-armoured-cars-bound-for-ukraine-war-in-australian-support-deal-20230605-p5de5a.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965791

File: 26e6fb394fff1d6⋯.mp4 (15.97 MB,640x360,16:9,Exclusive_Text_messages_re….mp4)

>>18928680

>>18954987

>>18955096

Tanya Plibersek 'briefed' by Brittany Higgins despite denials as Labor ministers come under fire for 'politicising case'

Senior Labor ministers have come under intense scrutiny over their involvement in “politicising” the Brittany Higgins case as Sky News Australia’s Sharri Markson reveals who knew about the allegations before the story was made public.

Tyrone Clarke - June 6, 2023

1/2

Labor ministers Tanya Plibersek and Katy Gallagher likely knew about Brittany Higgins' rape allegations before the story became public despite repeated denials.

The two ministers have been caught up in the high-profile case following explosive recordings aired during Bruce Lehrmann’s interview with the Seven Network on Sunday.

The broadcast aired recordings from a meeting with Ms Higgins, her partner David Sharaz, Lisa Wilkinson, and her producer Angus Llewellyn ahead of The Project interview in March 2021.

The tape shows the group discussing how best to capitalise on the story using their political connections, with Mr Sharaz boasting of his friendship with now-Finance Minister Katy Gallagher.

Responding to questions on which “friendly MPs” she could get to grill the then-Morrison government, Ms Wilkinson also said “oh, certainly Albo” and “Tanya Plibersek, definitely”.

Ms Plibersek on Monday strongly refuted suggestions she had been in contact with Ms Wilkinson or knew of the case before it made public.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also rejected claims he was enlisted by The Project team or the Higgins camp to probe the Morrison government.

But on Tuesday night Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson revealed secret text messages between Ms Higgins and ABC journalist Laura Tingle which showed Ms Plibersek had been briefed on the matter in early 2021.

"Hi Laura, hope you are well. Just letting you know that I'm going to lodge the formal complaint against the AFP today,” Ms Higgins wrote in April 2021.

“These are the notes compiled by the DPP Shane Drumgold in relation to police misconduct.

“Tanya P is across the detail as I looped her in earlier this year, if you'd like to speak about it off the record with someone.”

Ms Plibersek and Mr Albanese were among the first two MPs to attack the government of the day over Ms Higgins’ accusations.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965798

File: 55f12e2528f3c48⋯.mp4 (15.96 MB,640x360,16:9,Exclusive_Text_messages_re….mp4)

>>18965791

2/2

They were also joined by their Senate colleagues and now frontbenchers, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Finance Minister Katy Gallagher.

The pair were later caught up in a clash in Senate Estimates when Ms Higgins' employer at the time of the alleged rape, Linda Reynolds, accused them of having knowledge of the incident before it broke in March 2021.

“I was told by one of your senators two weeks before about what you were intending to do with the story in my office, two weeks before,” Ms Reynolds said in June 2021.

Ms Wong and Ms Gallagher both flatly rejected the claim.

“I had no knowledge of this until it happened,” Ms Wong said.

Ms Gallagher hit back at the Liberal Senator and said: “No one had any knowledge, how dare you, it’s all about protecting yourself”.

Pointing to the recordings from the Lehrmann interview when Mr Sharaz claimed he was friends with Ms Gallagher, Markson said the evidence showed the Finance Minister “probably did know about this beforehand”.

“I’ve got a friend in Labor, Katy Gallagher on the Labor side, who will probe and continue it going, so sitting week, story comes out they have to answer questions in Question Time, it’s a mess for them. That’s why Britt’s picked that timeline,” Mr Sharaz can be heard saying.

Markson suggested Ms Gallagher and Ms Wong may have misled the Parliament in their denials of having knowledge of the alleged rape during the Senate Estimates hearing.

“We're discovering this wasn't the simple tale of a girl allegedly raped in Parliament House,” Markson said.

“Labor was heavily involved in politicising the entire case right from the start from before the story was ever made public.”

Ms Reynolds also told Markson there was “no question in my mind that Katy Gallagher misled the Senate”.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/tanya-plibersek-briefed-by-brittany-higgins-despite-denials-as-labor-ministers-come-under-fire-for-politicising-case/news-story/4a63021d4ea905d165c2b07a3c013f95

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965804

File: e862baa88c06f18⋯.jpg (170.41 KB,1279x719,1279:719,A_detective_who_investigat….jpg)

File: febc55012b470fa⋯.jpg (89.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

File: 194da63704ee730⋯.jpg (104.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,David_Sharaz.jpg)

File: 9516a2234292df5⋯.jpg (117.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann.jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Detective investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation complained he ‘didn’t like being threatened’ after call with her boyfriend

Samantha Maiden - June 7, 2023

A detective who investigated Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation complained he “didn’t like being threatened” after a phone call with her partner David Sharaz.

In fresh witness statements released by the Board of inquiry into the conduct of police, prosecutors and the Victim of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates, the distress of the senior police officer has been laid bare.

The inquiry has previously heard evidence from Detective Superintendent Scott Moller that shortly after Mr Sharaz’s phone call to Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, the ­instruct­ions were delivered to charge Bruce Lehrmann.

He said Mr Sharaz threatened to go public with complaints over the speed of the rape investigation and sent emails to the detective investigating the case and the Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates.

Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, a senior investigator, has provided a witness statement to the inquiry but has not been called to give oral evidence.

But in a witness statement provided to the inquiry by Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates, she details a conversation with Det Insp Boorman on the 30th of July, 2021.

“I was copied into an email from Mr Sharaz to Mr. Boorman and Mr. Moller confirming Miss Higgins’ desire to have the process resolved as soon as possible,’’ Ms Yates said.

“I then received a missed call from Mr Boorman at 2:39pm and a text message from him at 2:41pm asking me to call him. I then called him.

“It was my recollection that Mr Boorman was upset and said to me, words to the effect of “I don’t like being threatened.”

“My recollection was and I said to Mr. Boorman, Ms Higgins is concerned about having the investigation wrapped up as soon as possible.”

The inquiry has previously heard evidence that Mr Sharaz on July 29, 2021, sent an email marked “Subject:News Story”.

In the correspondence, he notes that Ms Higgins had placed her “life on hold, and awaits a step forward from the police”.

“We have both remained silent, as per the direction of the police, and have asked them to keep us in the loop on any media commentary they plan to make,’’ he wrote.

“l was hoping we could once again seek guidance on whether we can expect an outcome, as indicated, by the end of the month?

“We will continue to abide by the no public commentary direction in place.”

The next day, he rang a senior detective, Marcus Boorman, threatening to go public over the failure to charge Bruce Lehrmann, an inquiry has heard.

“I trust you’re both well. Thank you for your time on the phone this morning Marcus,’’ Mr Sharaz said.

“Just confirming the desire of Brittany to have this process resolved sooner rather than later, and her expectation for a direction to be given as to what the next step is.

“She expects that direction by the end of the day as indicated by you both when you flew up to Brisbane. As always, happy to discuss over the phone.”

Shortly afterwards, Det Insp Boorman went on leave.

“At the time Mr Lehrmann was charged I was on extended personal leave,’’ he told the inquiry in a written statement.

Det Insp Boorman is the same man who Bruce Lehrmann’s defence barrister Steve Whybrow said had expressed the view that his client was innocent and threatened to quit in the event of a conviction.

“When I saw him, he appeared to me to be anxious and agitated and concerned that we not be seen speaking together in the direct line of sight of the ODPP [office of the director of public prosecutions],” Mr Whybrow said in a statement.

“DI Boorman indicated to me that he was quite distressed about this prosecution and considered that Mr Lehrmann was innocent.

“He made several other comments along these lines and I recall he said words to the effect ‘if the jury comes back with a guilty verdict, I’m resigning’.”

Whybrow said in his statement that he “had never before had a conversation with a police officer who had indicated that they were going to resign because they had been ordered to prosecute someone they considered was innocent”.

In his own written statement to the inquiry, Detective Inspector Boorman acknowledged he had met with Mr Whybrow while the jury in Mr Lehrmann’s trial was deliberating.

But does not mention a discussion with Mr Whybrow where he offered to resign or said Mr Lehrmann was innocent.

He has not been called to give oral evidence.

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/detective-investigating-brittany-higgins-rape-allegation-complained-he-didnt-like-being-threatened-after-call-with-her-boyfriend/news-story/d2b444cc890f316b58fbc861f247551d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965820

File: 501c2b3332d7318⋯.jpg (79.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Then_Australian_Republican….jpg)

File: 0b56023c0e01c51⋯.jpg (139.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Liberals_agree_on_an_I….jpg)

>>18928670

There’s nothing impartial or even-handed in Labor’s support for the Indigenous voice to parliament

JAMES ALLAN - JUNE 7, 2023

1/2

Think back to the last constitutional referendum held in this country, nearly a quarter of a century ago. There were two proposed changes, but the main one was about a move to a republic. John Howard, himself a constitutional monarchist, was prime minister.

Any disinterested spectator would have noticed that there was meticulous procedural fairness in how the referendum was run. Howard and his government were scrupulously even-handed as regards those who were on the other side of the referendum debate.

Most importantly, both the Yes and the No sides of the referendum were equally funded by government, and this despite the fact the preponderance of corporate money would go to the side opposed to Howard and the constitutional monarchists, and Howard knew it.

No one can say the same about how Anthony Albanese is running this referendum proposing to add a new chapter to our Constitution involving a voice body. The way it’s being run looks close to being an attempt to put a heavy thumb on the scales, most obviously because Labor and the Prime Minister have opted not to fund the No case.

Can you imagine the reaction had Howard decided he would not fund the Yes case for a republic back in 1999? The near duplicitous response from this government is that “well, we’re not funding either side of the referendum this time, so that’s fair”. But this is sophistry.

Albanese knows the vast preponderance of the corporate, sporting and even charity world are going to pour money into the coffers of the Yes campaign. And, of course, the ABC and the bulk of the legacy media have a clear preference for one side to win, and readers know this will be reflected in what is reported, and how.

So withholding government funding from the two sides in this referendum, something that has almost never happened in any of the other 44 constitutional referendums we’ve held in Australia, goes a long way to making it hard for the No campaign to get its case to the people. And that, our disinterested spectator would surmise, is the whole point.

It gets worse. Although the government says it is funding neither side, it has allocated tens of millions of dollars on a public information campaign and TV ads. The idea that a bureaucracy and government that has shaped its whole agenda around getting this referendum passed can be impartial and even-handed is laughable.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965824

File: 2325bfebe20fd66⋯.jpg (141.85 KB,1280x720,16:9,Linda_Burney_and_referendu….jpg)

>>18965820

2/2

The great English philosopher John Stuart Mill knew the best way to approach truth is to open up the cauldron of competing ideas and leave those most committed to a position able to do so. Someone who favours gun control makes the case better than someone opposed trying his darnedest to be impartial – assuming he is trying to be impartial.

And so it is that we see the early TV ads being cutesy and casuistical. They emphasise “recognition” when most opponents would be happy with some mention in the preamble, and are actually opposed to creating this body that will be chosen by only some Australians (thereby conflicting with the core principle of life in liberal democracies, namely equal citizenship). No mention of that in the ads. Nor do they mention that most of us in the No camp see this proposal as leading to judicial activism – because in a few years the sort of judges who have of late been incredibly activist around Aboriginal matters will turn “may make representations to parliament” into some sort of constitutional right to be consulted.

The ads skip over another key point. What will be encompassed by “making laws with respect to matters relating to Aboriginal peoples”? Watch the government’s “purely factual” ads and there’s a fair chance you’d come away with the idea that only laws directly and solely affecting Aboriginal people will fall within the aegis of this voice body.

That is almost certainly untrue. Every law any parliament passes can be thought to relate to Aboriginal peoples, and indeed to all of us. Give it 10 years and see if that’s not the top court’s interpretation.

I’ve been opposed to this voice proposal from day one. It’s wrong on moral grounds (for going down the group rights road and breaking the commitment to equal citizenship). It’s wrong on political grounds because our already sclerotic lawmaking process will grind massively more slowly if this body has to be consulted on near-on everything. And it’s wrong on legal and constitutional grounds (not least because this will be the first proposed referendum mooting a new chapter in our Constitution, a fact that is begging the judges to be activist, because past forays into “making it up at the point of application” always involve judges pointing to the structure and different-chapters nature of our Constitution).

That’s my substantive position.

But the worst feature of all as regards what is going on is the way the PM and Labor are gaming the whole referendum process in a way Howard wouldn’t, and in fact didn’t.

This alone is reason enough to vote no.

James Allan is Garrick professor of law at the University of Queensland.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/theres-nothing-impartial-or-evenhanded-in-labors-support-for-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/365d8d6b76fd2710ea4494382b362d0e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965852

File: ff3110cbd447e1e⋯.jpg (120.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chin_Tan_Race_Discriminati….jpg)

File: 740ac74e1cc46b3⋯.jpg (157.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Migrants_got_a_fair_go_it_….jpg)

>>18928670

Migrants got a fair go, it’s our turn to pay it forward with the Indigenous voice to parliament

SHIREEN MORRIS - JUNE 7, 2023

1/2

Last week a growing alliance of more than 120 ethnic and cultural community organisations expressed their steadfast support for a Yes vote in the upcoming Indigenous voice to parliament referendum.

Signatories to the new website multiculturalforvoice.org include several Indian and Chinese community organisations, along with Sri Lankan, Italian, Irish, Iranian, Greek, Vietnamese, Filipino, Sikh, Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist and Pacific Islander community groups – to name just a few.

However, in a strange attempt to counterbalance the unprecedented expression of multicultural solidarity with Indigenous people, the ABC and SBS grasped at straws: they platformed Jamal Daoud, a former candidate for the United Australia Party, who claimed he had started a multicultural group to oppose the voice.

Daoud’s group does not yet appear to exist. There is no information about it online. After the publication of the news stories, a single YouTube video was posted showing Daoud with Warren Mundine. When I last checked, that video had only two views and one subscriber. Yet Daoud’s assertions were promoted. The SBS story even reported Daoud’s assertion that the voice would prompt the government to close Australia’s borders and stop immigration. Why are Australia’s public broadcasters helping spread such misinformation?

In fact, the growing multicultural support for the voice referendum is clear and unsurprising.

Many migrants and descendants of migrants feel deep empathy for Indigenous people. Many also have experienced discrimination. Some come from countries with histories of colonisation. We know what it is like to feel excluded or that we don’t belong.

My parents migrated to Australia from India via Fiji towards the end of the White Australia policy. They came from poor backgrounds, worked hard and prospered. I feel incredibly lucky to be born Australian, but we also know the history: this great democracy – and the opportunity and prosperity so many migrants enjoy – was built off the back of Indigenous losses. Most migrants have been given more of a fair go here than the original owners of the land.

Take voting rights. The Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902 provided that “aboriginal natives” of Australia, Asia, Africa or the Pacific Islands were not entitled to be on an electoral roll. A Victorian Indian man, Mitta Bullosh, challenged his exclusion from voting in 1924. The commonwealth subsequently altered the act to allow Indian people to vote – but not Indigenous people, who didn’t get equal voting rights across jurisdictions until four decades later. If only Bullosh had advocated the rights of his Indigenous compatriots along with his own.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965856

File: 3151548764e3703⋯.jpg (115.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_Patrick_D….jpg)

>>18965852

2/2

While my parents could purchase property to build our lives in Victoria, the Wik people up north in Aurukun could not. The Queensland government had a policy preventing Indigenous people from buying large tracts of land. Wik leader John Koowarta challenged it and in 1982 the High Court struck down the policy. But the government declared the land a national park, which meant it couldn’t be bought. Is it any wonder so many Indigenous families suffer intergenerational disadvantage to a far greater extent than other Australians?

A constitutional voice will not “re-racialise” the Constitution, as Opposition Leader Peter Dutton claims. Race has been in the Constitution since 1901. Indigenous people have been treated unjustly because they were considered an “inferior race”. There were race-based clauses excluding them and some race-based constitutional provisions remain.

Indigenous recognition through a voice aims to fix this discriminatory exclusion by belatedly including and recognising Indigenous people in the Constitution. Giving Indigenous communities an advisory voice in their affairs will help prevent discrimination, to improve policies and practical outcomes.

The claim that the voice will divide Australians by race has been rejected by Chin Tan, Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner, who is of Malaysian-Chinese origin – an appointee of the former LNP government. Tan says a Yes vote would be “a powerful act of national unity”.

Nor will it be the case, as some have claimed, that Indian, Chinese or Vietnamese Australians will all need a constitutional voice too, just because Indigenous Australians will have one if the referendum succeeds.

There is no Native Title Act for Indians. There is no closing the gap policy for Indians. Why? Because Indians were not dispossessed in this country.

Only one group was dispossessed of their land when the British came: Indigenous people. Indigenous Australians were the only group explicitly excluded from the Constitution of 1901, through race-based clauses singling them out.

And Indigenous Australians are still the only group for whom the federal parliament has a special constitutional power – the race power – which it uses to make laws only about Indigenous Australians.

Indigenous communities occupy a special historical place in this country. Provided with accurate information, most multicultural Australians understand this.

I urge migrants and their descendants: do not be passive bystanders in this debate. It is inspiring to see more than 120 multicultural community organisations stepping up, saying Yes and helping educate their communities – but we can and must do more.

We must fight fake news with facts. We must counter misinformation and division with truth and compassion. Let us do the hard work together. If multicultural Australians stand in solidarity with Indigenous people, the referendum will succeed.

Shireen Morris is a constitutional lawyer and director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University law school. @ShireenMorrisMs

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/migrants-got-a-fair-go-its-our-turn-to-pay-it-forward-with-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/18deeeade668fcecf50545f57d9b2186

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965884

File: 103c361c5642840⋯.jpg (145.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Protesters_at_the_Abolish_….jpg)

File: c509d71bef94822⋯.jpg (423.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Phillip_Goodman_and_family….jpg)

>>18829336 (pb)

>>18965852

Indigenous voice to parliament ‘does not deal with the reality of what it means to be Aboriginal and what people endure day-to-day’

VICTORIA GRIEVES WILLIAMS - JUNE 5, 2023

“The gap is between well and sick, free and incarcerated, violent and peaceful, employable and unemployable, not between Indigenous and all others. If people knew the real gaps between remote and very remote profiles and those of the now great Aboriginal middle class of urban Australia they would stop these false comparisons. They would also be even more horrified than they already are.” – Professor Peter Sutton

Professor Sutton had read a chapter I wrote for an upcoming publication on Aboriginal spirituality. I was trying to set the scene for an international audience: “There is a huge continuing gap in the indicators of disadvantage between Aboriginal people and the general population including: earlier deaths, greater rates of infant mortality, lower incomes and employment rates, lower education achievement, higher incarceration and absurdly high rates of child removal from families.”

His response is worth repeating. I can only agree; I need to be more forthright in communicating the reality of Aboriginal lives.

The gap between Aboriginal and mainstream Australia as figured by the federal government, that guides its policy and program development, is based on an homogenisation of Aboriginal people. It is so dangerous that, in my opinion, it needs to be scrapped.

It is a result of the differentiation of Aboriginal Australians into white and black, settler and Indigenous, and I believe it is killing remote Aboriginal Australians. This is not only a geographic value: Aboriginal people can be four hours from Sydney by car and be remote from services. There is a huge complexity in Aboriginal Australia that has not been captured by government statistics.

The Indigenous voice to parliament will only compound this complexity by taking over the existing arrangements that Aboriginal groups have or are developing, for their relationships to governments. It is the more highly educated, urban Aboriginal people who will have a voice; those called elites, and many with dubious claims to being Aboriginal at all.

There are many reasons to vote No to the legislation that establishes the voice to parliament: the lack of recognition of First Nations in the concept; the associated lack of a cultural rationale. How is it Indigenous? How can it succeed without being recognisably Indigenous? Associated with this lack of connection to the reality of life in Aboriginal communities is that just by its existence it will undermine the power First Nations have over their lands and waters, their existing relationships to governments, their autonomy; for these reasons it is bound to cause and exacerbate conflicts.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965886

File: 64787107c9e85f1⋯.jpg (164.34 KB,768x1024,3:4,_Real_gaps_Anthropolgist_P….jpg)

File: 7c03bec5747f59e⋯.jpg (56.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_child_at_the_Alice_Sprin….jpg)

>>18965884

2/2

I have lived in two cities where resettled Aboriginal families were brought to live on others’ country and the conflicts were extreme. I have family where many groups have been resettled in their country from Protection Board days, and they have experienced horrendous violence. This conflict in communities in NSW is generally around land council business, housing in particular. It is a direct result of the lack of recognition of traditional connection to country by the NSW Aboriginal Land Rights Act of 1983. The voice promises to have a similar impact.

Gaynor Macdonald, the first anthropologist to work with the NSW Aboriginal Land Council, was of the opinion that the NSW act was the most destructive thing that had happened to Wiradjuri people. Macdonald had worked with Wiradjuri for 40 years, and she saw the impacts of the imposition of an administrative regime that ran counter to their personhood and cultural ways of being.

I see this replicated in the concept of the voice, which has not been called for by Aboriginal people per se but by a small elite group. This proposal does not deal with the reality of what it means to be Aboriginal and what people endure day-to-day. It promises little for a huge effort by Indigenous Australians to meet the requirements of this imposition of a huge bureaucracy on their lives.

The Calma-Langton report outlines a scheme for regions that will choose members based on settler colonial political boundaries, rather than Aboriginal boundaries to country and neighbouring groups.

This is inexplicable: it creates whole new “Aboriginal” groupings that will be in conflict with, and cut across, the traditional cultural groupings such as now exist within native title and land council boundaries.

Further, the scheme for 24 members and 22 regions will have impossibly large regions in each state and territory, except for Tasmania and the Torres Strait Islands, where the allocated two regions are likely manageable. This scheme means huge numbers of people vying for the opportunity to be the voice to parliament as part of the ongoing homogenisation of Aboriginal people and their circumstances.

We need new major developments coming out of a thorough research base that helps to untangle the complexity and understand the differences. This would come about by truth talking, the opportunity for every Aboriginal person to have a say in what they need to have happen. A thorough, community-by-community stocktake.

This could happen through a royal commission with Indigenous commissioners whose job it would be to listen and document, then make recommendations.

Victoria Grieves Williams PhD has worked for almost 40 years in Aboriginal affairs.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/this-voice-does-not-speak-for-the-real-aboriginal-australia/news-story/5518343b429c4ca5b53429b84b6d0566

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965896

File: 1865b26188887c2⋯.jpg (99.83 KB,1024x768,4:3,Victoria_Premier_Daniel_An….jpg)

File: 6e5307eb3a393f2⋯.jpg (114.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Melbourne_s_Lord_Mayor_Sal….jpg)

>>18960196

Daniel Andrews responds to allegations reporters were barred from attending pro-China forum speech

Daniel Andrews has refused to release notes for a secretive Chinese forum speech, an event Australian journalists were reportedly barred from.

Alex Blair - June 7, 2023

Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews has come under scrutiny for refusing to release the speaking notes for his speech at a secretive Chinese forum, an event Australian journalists were reportedly barred from.

The Premier delivered the speech on behalf of Victoria at the Post Pandemic China-Australia Economic Cooperation Forum — but the media has been denied access to the contents of it.

Reporters fromThe Herald Sun attempted to attend the forum but were turned away. It reported that only Chinese media were allowed to participate.

Signs at the venue also prohibited photography and videography during the event.

When questioned about the lack of transparency, Premier Andrews claimed that he did not refer to the provided notes during his speech, rendering their release unnecessary.

“I didn’t use notes. I spoke off the cuffs. It’s often my practice, to the enduring frustration of my staff, I didn’t necessarily refer to them,” he said.

“I didn’t use them, so what purpose would that serve (to release them).”

He also said he was unaware of the media ban and shifted responsibility to the event organisers for issues related to attendance.

“I didn’t organise the event. I didn’t invite anyone to the event. I didn’t prevent anyone from going to the event,” he said.

“If you have a challenge or a problem or issues in relation to the event, then the event organisers would be the logical place to go … about who was invited in and who wasn’t.”

Andrews said he was merely strengthening relations with his state’s “biggest customer”.

“It was an important event,” he said.

“I certainly made the point that the China and Victoria partnership is critically important to jobs, to exports, to international education, to food and wine and every sector really.

“They are our biggest trading partner. If you’ve got a bad relationship with your biggest customer, your business has got real problems.”

Opposition Leader John Pesutto criticised the secrecy, asserting that speeches made by political leaders should not be delivered in secret, as they represent the people.

“This is not IBAC where he gets to make his comments in secret. These are speeches that he’s making on behalf of the Victorian people,” he said.

“No political leader, whether it’s Daniel Andrews or myself, should expect to be able to give speeches in secret.

“It’s just not the way we operate in Victoria.”

Victorian Liberal MP James Paterson also raised concerns about one of the forum’s sponsors, the China Institute for Innovation and Development Strategy (CIIDS), claiming it to be a front group for China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS), the country’s top spy agency.

Senator Paterson described the Premier’s decision to give a speech while barring media access as highly irregular and inappropriate. He questioned the motives behind the secrecy, wondering what Premier Andrews might be concealing.

In contrast, Melbourne Lord Mayor Sally Capp shared her speech in its entirety and emphasised the importance of the forum for future commercial opportunities and strengthening ties with China.

Mayor Capp highlighted Melbourne’s close connections with China, including sister-city relationships with Tianjin and strategic partnerships with other Chinese cities.

She praised the achievements in education, culture, business, trade, and people-to-people exchange resulting from these connections. Mayor Capp also acknowledged the significant impact of the reopening of China on Melbourne, with the potential to bring investment, jobs, and trade opportunities to the city.

“Needless to say, the City of Melbourne values our Chinese community who helped build and continue to work with us to shape this city in many wonderful ways,” Ms Capp said.

“I want to thank the China Chamber of Commerce Australia for playing an important role in supporting Chinese enterprises in Australia, particularly in Melbourne.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/politics/daniel-andrews-responds-to-allegations-reporters-were-barred-from-attending-prochina-forum-speech/news-story/d9261c4738a0c3bd4c6201b5bd55477c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965905

File: 824e65f8641c1c5⋯.jpg (762.38 KB,3743x2495,3743:2495,Yintao_Roger_Yu_described_….jpg)

China used ‘god credential’ to spy on ByteDance users

Joel Rosenblatt - Jun 7, 2023

Chinese Communist Party members used a “god credential” at TikTok parent ByteDance to examine the personal data of civil rights activists and protesters in Hong Kong, and identify and track them down, a former company executive said in a court filing.

Yintao “Roger” Yu, a former head of engineering in the US for ByteDance, described a special committee of the Chinese government installed at the company’s Beijing offices that he said monitored all data on the platform, including that of users in the US, according to the filing.

“This was a backdoor to any barrier ByteDance had supposedly installed to protect data from the Chinese Communist Party’s surveillance,” according to the filing in state court in San Francisco. The party’s “superuser credential,” also known as a “god credential,” was “commonly discussed between employees at various levels of the company, including senior executives,” Mr Yu said.

The company also worked with the CCP to promote propaganda, Mr Yu said.

“Yu observed that ByteDance demoted content that expressed support for the protests in Hong Kong [‘Umbrella Revolution’], while it promoted content that expressed criticisms of the protests in Hong Kong,” Yu said.

ByteDance representatives didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. The company has previously called Mr Yu’s allegations “baseless,” and said it will vigorously fight the suit.

Mr Yu added the surveillance claims this week to his May lawsuit which alleges he was fired in retaliation for his complaints to ByteDance supervisors about illegal conduct at the company. Mr Yu said he saw the “god credential” used in 2018, the same year he was terminated, to monitor Hong Kong activists identified in previous protests.

TikTok faces growing pressure, and potential bans, from state and federal officials in Australia and the US following reports that the company has stored personal financial information of American users on servers in China that employees there can access.

Mr Yu said in his filing that the TikTok app stores users’ direct messages, search histories, what they view and for how long.

In a signed declaration in his most recent filing, Mr Yu said he anticipates his lawsuit will attract the attention of US and state legislators, requiring “a certain level of coordination” of legal actions. The filings don’t explain what such coordination means in any detail.

ByteDance users who uploaded content of protests in Hong Kong were also monitored by Chinese officials and “external investigators,” according to the filing. Device identifiers of activists were tracked, as well as their network information, SIM card identifications, and IP addresses, Mr Yu said, adding that he saw from ByteDance logs that committee members examined unique user data, locations, and communications.

https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/china-used-god-credential-to-spy-on-bytedance-users-20230607-p5deno

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965915

File: 4c0577c2766e3a9⋯.jpg (85.85 KB,740x493,740:493,Milton_Orkopoulos_pictured….jpg)

Ex-MP Milton Orkopoulos taken to hospital after being bashed in jail

Georgina Mitchell - June 7, 2023

Convicted child sex offender and former NSW Labor minister Milton Orkopoulos has been taken to hospital with head, body and leg injuries after being bashed in custody.

Orkopoulos, 65, was found injured at Long Bay jail about 12.15pm on Tuesday and was taken to Prince of Wales Hospital, where he remained on Wednesday.

“A 65-year-old inmate has received treatment in hospital following an assault at the Metropolitan Special Programs Centre, at Long Bay,” a NSW Corrective Services spokeswoman said in a statement.

“At about 12.15pm on Tuesday, 6 June 2023 correctional officers initiated a medical response after the man was discovered with suspected head injuries. NSW Police were notified.

“Corrective Services NSW takes great care to determine appropriate security classifications and placements for inmates to maintain the safety and security of our prisons.”

A NSW Police spokesperson said officers from the Eastern Beaches area command “are investigating an assault at a Matraville correctional facility” which occurred on Tuesday afternoon.

“A 65-year-old man was hospitalised after suffering head, body and leg injuries,” the spokesperson said.

Orkopoulos is awaiting sentence on 26 charges after he was found guilty in April of sexually abusing four boys between 1993 and 2003. It is his second conviction for child sexual abuse.

Prosecutors said Orkopoulos had a sexual interest in young boys which he acted on “time and time again”, abusing the boys aged between 10 and 14 and plying them with cannabis and money.

He was previously convicted in 2008 of sexually abusing three other boys and supplying them with drugs between 1995 and 2006. He was jailed for a maximum of 13 years and eight months.

Orkopoulos was the state member for Swansea from 1999 to 2006 and the minister for Aboriginal affairs from 2005 to 2006. Some of the offences occurred in and around his electorate office.

In his most recent trial, Orkopoulos attempted to dismiss the charges against him by claiming they were “fanciful” and “outrageously wrong”.

He is due to face court for sentencing proceedings on August 25.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/ex-mp-milton-orkopoulos-taken-to-hospital-after-being-bashed-in-jail-20230607-p5deqz.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965947

File: 2e3ec30aa3174e7⋯.jpg (78.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,British_cardiologist_Dr_As….jpg)

File: af45b81c14c318f⋯.jpg (186.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,People_line_up_at_a_vaccin….jpg)

British cardiologist calls for mRNA vaccines to be suspended due to heart risks

A British cardiologist has called for Covid vaccines to be suspended in Australia due to heart risks, accusing the TGA of a “cover-up”.

Frank Chung - June 7, 2023

1/3

A controversial British cardiologist has called for the Pfizer and Moderna Covid shots to be suspended in Australia until the risk of heart complications is better understood, saying prior vaccines “have been pulled for much less”.

Dr Aseem Malhotra, who has emerged as one of the most high-profile figures in the anti-vaccine movement and is currently in Australia on a speaking tour, said it was a “no-brainer” and accused the medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), of ignoring the clear safety signal from its own reporting system once the rollout was well under way.

“People can be forgiving if new information comes in, we know people make mistakes — but once you get that information back, them not acting on it … the problem is the cover-up is worse than the crime,” he said.

The 45-year-old boasts an impressive resume but has become a polarising figure since last year, when he first called for the suspension of mRNA Covid vaccines and started making claims — which have been disputed by fact checkers — about their dangers.

Professor Marc Dweck, chair of clinical cardiology at the University of Edinburgh, told The Guardian in January that Dr Malhotra’s opinions were “misguided and in fact dangerous”.

“The vast majority of cardiologists do not agree with his views and they are not based upon robust science,” he said. “I would strongly urge patients to disregard his comments, which seem to be more concerned with furthering his profile … rather than the wellbeing of the public.”

Dr Malhotra, a National Health Service-trained consultant cardiologist and prominent public health commentator for many years in the UK — particularly on diet-related illnesses and the pharmaceutical industry — appeared on breakfast TV in 2021 to encourage Britons to get vaccinated.

But last July, his father, Dr Kailash Chand, former deputy chair of the British Medical Association (BMA) died unexpectedly of a cardiac arrest at 73.

“At the time people were trolling me, saying it was the vaccine, and I got really angry and blocked them, because that was not my mindset — but then I started to notice increased incidences in cardiac deaths and I started to wonder,” he told The Telegraph earlier this year.

He would come to attribute the death of his father, who he described as “one of the fittest guys I knew”, to the Covid booster shot six months earlier.

“Previous scans showed he had nothing significant, no underlying conditions,” he said.

Dr Malhotra has since courted controversy with inflammatory statements on social media linking high-profile deaths or injuries to the vaccine, such as the on-field cardiac arrest of American football player Damar Hamlin in January.

In April, Hamlin told reporters that “the diagnosis of what happened to me was commotio cordis”, or a “direct blow at a specific point in your heartbeat that causes cardiac arrest”.

Dr Malhotra has also linked unusually high excess death rates in many developed countries to the vaccination rollout.

That claim has been widely disputed by experts, who instead attribute the rise in deaths to factors including Covid itself, undiagnosed illnesses after lockdowns, and strain on health services.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965949

File: 17d2163954cddff⋯.jpg (336.71 KB,825x859,825:859,PKPAM_1.jpg)

File: 6461468d4e38904⋯.jpg (468.37 KB,825x983,825:983,DAM_1.jpg)

>>18965947

2/3

In January, the BBC was forced to apologise after Dr Malhotra “hijacked” a live TV interview to claim that “Covid mRNA vaccines do carry a cardiovascular risk” and call for the rollout to be suspended pending an inquiry into excess deaths.

But Dr Malhotra is unrepentant.

“Basically, all patients with unexpected heart attacks or cardiac arrests have to be seen as being caused by the vaccine until proven otherwise — even several months later, so even, I would say, up to two years since having the vax,” he said.

“As a cardiologist, it is unusual to see sudden cardiac death. We have a mechanism of action, it would be unscientific not to include it as a potential cause. What the vaccine does is it accelerates the progress of coronary artery disease, so someone who otherwise wouldn’t have is going to present several months or a year later.”

In recent months Dr Malhotra has been on a “world tour of activism”, even making an appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience in April.

The description for his Australian tour says he will be “raising public awareness about vaccine injuries and providing a risk-benefit, evidence-based analysis of the Covid vaccines with special emphasis on cardiovascular complications and solutions”.

Despite speaking at a series of sold-out events in Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Adelaide, Perth and the Gold Coast, Dr Malhotra’s Australian tour has been met with a virtual media blackout.

Save for an appearance on Sky News Australia and an article in the small local publication Canberra Weekly about his speech there, most media outlets have steered well clear.

Dr Malhotra said it only highlighted the disconnect between the public and institutions including government, health and media.

“What’s really interesting is everyone comes up to me and is aware, and doctors are seeing stuff, but they are generally afraid to say anything,” he said, adding he was meeting many doctors at his talks.

“You could argue I’m speaking to an echo chamber … [but] the professionals are very supportive — they’re horrified, sad. When you speak to people on the ground, taxi drivers, shopkeepers, everyone is aware of someone they know, either a family member or friend, who suffered a serious adverse event.”

Dr Malhotra said the “objective evidence to support the fact there is a disconnect between the public and the establishment is people are not turning up” to get boosters.

According to the most recent Health Department figures, 16.5 million Australians, or 82 per cent, had their last Covid vaccine more than six months ago, making them “out of date” under the new definition.

Just under 3.1 million, or 15 per cent, have had a vaccine within the last six months.

“There is a massive drop among people who are recommended to have boosters,” he said. “That [loss of trust] is not a good recipe — where does that lead us next?”

Myocarditis and pericarditis — inflammation of the heart or lining around the heart — are known but rare side effects of the mRNA vaccines.

According to the TGA, myocarditis is reported in one to two out of every 100,000 people who receive Pfizer or Moderna, but young men and boys are more at risk.

“These are usually temporary conditions, with most people getting better within a few days,” the TGA says. “Vaccination against Covid-19 is the most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from infection. The protective benefits of vaccination far outweigh the potential risks.”

As of May 28, 2023, the TGA has received 138,730 total adverse event reports from 67.4 million doses administered, a rate of 0.2 per cent.

The medicines regulator has identified 14 reports where the cause of death was linked to vaccination, from 986 reports received and reviewed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965952

File: 6dd94c87e8959ab⋯.jpg (97.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_receives_….jpg)

>>18965949

3/3

But Dr Malhotra is one of a growing number of health professionals arguing the true rate of serious adverse events is far higher than reported.

He accused the TGA of “wilful blindness”.

“Think about it from a psychological perspective — they are responsible in a way for approving and the mandating of these vaccines for all Australian citizens — it’s not easy to suddenly acknowledge what they’ve done is harm people to such a significant degree,” he said.

“It’s much easier to bury your head in the sand. I would be mortified to know what I’d done, even accidentally. But having said that, it is their job — there has to be accountability.”

He stressed he was a supporter of vaccines, and that’s why “people have to believe in the safety of vaccines”.

“Historically, traditional vaccines have a serious adverse event rate of one in one million — other vaccines have been pulled for much less,” he said, citing the 1976 swine flu vaccine which carried a one in 100,000 risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and the 1999 rotavirus vaccine which was linked to bowel obstruction at a rate of one in 10,000.

In December, former AMA president Dr Kerryn Phelps broke her silence about the “devastating” vaccine injury she and her wife suffered after Pfizer.

In a bombshell submission to parliament’s Long Covid inquiry, the former federal MP revealed she had spoken with other doctors “who have themselves experienced a serious and persistent adverse event” but that “vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about”.

“Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration,” she said.

Last week, Dr Phelps lent her tacit support to Dr Malhotra’s visit, sharing the Canberra Weekly article on social media in which he called for an inquiry into mRNA vaccines.

She declined to comment, however, saying she had not attended his talk in person.

Another high-profile physician, 2020 Australian of the Year Dr James Muecke, attended Dr Malhotra’s Adelaide talk over the weekend, happily posing for a photo afterwards.

But Dr Malhotra said there was a “culture of fear” with some people reluctant to even be seen attending his talks.

“All of this is suppression of free speech — Australians need to know their democracy is under attack,” he said.

The speaking tour is being arranged by the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS) — one of several splinter organisations born out of opposition to Covid vaccine mandates in 2021 — and sponsored by Gold Coast-based internet radio station TNT Radio, which the website Crikey recently described as “a home for Australia’s fringe political figures and international conspiracy theorists”.

Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) secretary Sally McManus in 2021 branded AMPS and other groups under the umbrella of Queensland-based Red Union as “fake unions run by LNP members and their associates set up to try and divide working people”.

Dr Malhotra countered that the smearing of anyone raising concerns as anti-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists or “cookers” was “part of the playbook” of the drug industry.

“One of the ways is through opposition fragmentation — it involves smearing and deplatforming those who are countering their narrative,” he said.

“This is not unusual. This is deliberate. If there are people who are in opposition, this is how we discredit them, this is how we frame them to other people in society. Big tobacco did it for many years — this is not new.”

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/british-cardiologist-calls-for-mrna-vaccines-to-be-suspended-due-to-heart-risks/news-story/7ced98559a790d325afc44ceb9cc2b95

https://twitter.com/drkerrynphelps/status/1664752386496413697

https://twitter.com/DrAseemMalhotra/status/1665606718158704640

https://amps.redunion.com.au/malhotra_tour2023

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18965978

File: a00d3a5bd465222⋯.mp4 (10.29 MB,640x360,16:9,Nigel_Farage_to_join_Donal….mp4)

File: 2bea8320876c6ae⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,5129x3419,5129:3419,Former_Brexit_campaigner_N….jpg)

File: 51c7a322ac42b85⋯.jpg (3.58 MB,4500x3000,3:2,Donald_Trump_Jr_is_set_to_….jpg)

>>18860803 (pb)

>>18940139

Nigel Farage said he decided to join Donald Trump Jr.'s Australian speaking tour because the former president's son is 'blooming-good fun'

Former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage is set to join Donald Trump Jr.'s Australian speaking tour, which the politician-turned GB News host declared is "going to be a great time."

Patrick Hannaford - June 6, 2023

Former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage has announced he is joining Donald Trump Jr.’s speaking tour of Australia.

The eldest son of the former US president is set to appear in Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne between 9 and 11 July, this year.

Speaking to Sky News Australia’s Paul Murray, the former UK politician-turned GB News host said he had decided to join the tour – which will also include South Australian senator Alex Antic – at the last minute.

“I’m coming, well for a couple of reasons really: One, I don’t think you get quite enough real, proper conservative conversation down in Australia these days; number two, I want you all to realise that whatever madnesses you're facing, we're facing them in America and in Britain; and number three, I really like Donald Trump Jr., he’s blooming-good fun, and it’s going to be a great time,” Mr Farage said.

In addition to being President Trump’s son, the 45-year-old Trump Jr. is a business executive, a bestselling author and TV personality.

Late last month Trump Jr. told Sky News Australia he was excited to return to Australia, after having previously backpacked around the eastern states when he was a college student.

"It’s a great country full of great people which is why it’s so sad to see what’s happening there,” he said.

Mr Trump said that he had always viewed Australia “as a pretty rugged country that believed in freedom” but that it was clear that “the same disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture that’s crippled the US” was also taking hold here.

“All of those sort of bastions of freedom and democracy that I thought really existed… the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK – these were the leading places to support that kind of freedom. And yet you saw just how fragile that was,” he said.

“You saw how quickly people were willing to just kowtow to the regimes and to what we all now know is fake science and nonsense.

“So, you know, I think it's important to make sure that we're fighting for that freedom.”

The former president’s son said that he knew from his fanbase that “an incredibly large number of people from Australia are sick of what's going on.”

“(They) are upset with what's happened to not just their country, but to these countries that represented the free world so well for so long,” he said

“And I'm just looking forward to getting down there and talking about it.”

Donald Trump Jr. and Nigel Farage’s tour is being hosted by Turning Point Australia, with tickets available at:

https://www.trumplive.com.au/

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/nigel-farage-said-he-decided-to-join-donald-trump-jrs-australian-speaking-tour-because-the-former-presidents-son-is-bloominggood-fun/news-story/b65f8697e77566bd0987b0473f22a457

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18966095

File: d6edbae8b9fdda3⋯.jpg (420.4 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Brittany_Higgins_with_her_….jpg)

File: 4ffdb5b2eaf0ff1⋯.jpg (103.33 KB,768x1024,3:4,Text_messages_between_Davi….jpg)

File: 79b6c6240675026⋯.jpg (98.5 KB,768x1024,3:4,Text_messages_between_Davi….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

‘Feed it to Katy’: Higgins-Sharaz text plots

Text messages between Brittany Higgins and boyfriend David Sharaz reveal the pair’s bid to enlist senior Labor figures to pursue her rape allegation.

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - 7 June 2023

1/4

A tranche of previously unseen text messages between Brittany Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz has revealed the pair ­planned to directly enlist the help of senior Labor figures to pursue Ms Higgins’ rape allegation and her belief the Coalition government covered it up.

The texts reveal Mr Sharaz arranging “drops” for favoured reporters, organising meetings with Labor MPs to bolster support for Ms Higgins’ claims of a cover-up by the Coalition government and disparaging former prime minister Scott Morrison, saying “I still hate the c…”.

Ms Higgins says: “He’s about to be f..ked over. Just wait. We’ve got him”.

Anthony Albanese this week emphatically denied claims of Labor involvement made in a five-hour pre-interview brainstorming session in which Ms Higgins, Mr Sharaz, Network Ten presenter Lisa Wilkinson and her producer Angus Llewellyn discussed whether “friendly MPs” could be used to publicise her case.

Asked by The Australian whether he had been solicited by Ms Wilkinson or anyone else associated with Ms Higgins to publicise the case in question time or elsewhere, the Prime Minister responded simply: “No.”

However, the text messages seen by The Australian reveal Mr Sharaz was in contact with Mr Albanese, and that both the former journalist and Ms Higgins had dozens of interactions with various other Labor MPs, some before Ms Higgins went public with her rape allegations.

The texts come from material produced during the investigation of Bruce Lehrmann and were widely distributed within the Australian Federal Police, the ACT office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, the defence and possibly other parties.

The Australian has redacted large parts of the material for privacy reasons, removing details unrelated to the political and public interest issues raised.

Sharaz boasted of special relationship with MP

The texts reveal Mr Sharaz, a former journalist, boasting of his special relationship with now-­Finance Minister Katy Gallagher.

On February 11, 2021, four days before Ms Higgins appeared on The Project to detail her claims, Mr Sharaz messaged her: “Katy is going to come to me with some questions you need to prepare for … She’s really invested now ha ha.”

Later Mr Sharaz wrote: “She’s an old friend. We opened a chair together! So you can trust her.”

Ms Higgins replied, “going forward pass my details onto Katy. I’m happy to talk to her.”

Mr Sharaz replied “No, no. That’s really okay … I don’t mind talking to Katy.

“But we can both speak to her if that’s easier.”

Seconds later, Ms Higgins then insisted to Mr Sharaz, “please just send people my way going forward.”

Later that day Mr Sharaz told Ms Higgins: “Katy Gallagher messaged me. She’s angry and wants to help. She’s got the context. Says they knew something was wrong because they fired Bruce and not you. They avoided a scandal.”

Ms Higgins: “Can I see her message?”

Mr Sharaz: “Yep! I gave her [The Project] interview for context. I hope that’s okay? She’s not doing anything with it. But I’m also happy to step out and let her talk to you if you want. Basically, I wanted her to get all the context because it’s so complicated.”

Ms Higgins: “That’s fine. It’ll all be public pretty soon anyway haha.”

Former defence minister Linda Reynolds told The Australian earlier this year the rape case was “weaponised” by Labor, denying Ms Higgins’s claims that she and her staff failed to support her in the ­aftermath or properly investigate the alleged assault by Bruce Lehrmann.

The text messages seen by The Australian reveal that Ms Higgins was concerned about litigation before The Project aired.

On February 11, she texted Mr Sharaz, “I’m just stressy that this will all become a litigious matter now.”

Mr Sharaz responded minutes later: “Suing you looks like doubling down on a victim close to an election. Politically it would be very stupid. Everything dragged out in court, all public. Do they want the 5 hours of stuff public? Nope.”

The five hours was a reference to the more than five hours of audio recording when Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz met Wilkinson and Llewellyn, as revealed in detail on Seven’s Spotlight program on Sunday night and reported by The Australian this week.

That audio captured the parties war-gaming who would be “friendly” MPs, journalists and other figures to keep Ms Higgins’ rape allegation going.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18966097

File: 0a75b505a7b6d7c⋯.jpg (66.39 KB,1280x720,16:9,Now_Finance_Minister_Katy_….jpg)

File: 8fd4341fb3f2510⋯.jpg (86.49 KB,768x1024,3:4,Text_messages_between_Davi….jpg)

File: 80d8dd520de1229⋯.jpg (52.04 KB,768x1024,3:4,Text_messages_between_Davi….jpg)

>>18966095

2/4

Direct contact with Anthony Albanese

On Tuesday Mr Albanese ­denied being asked by Ms Wilkinson or anyone else associated with Ms Higgins to publicise the case in question time or anywhere else.

Mr Albanese, then the opposition leader, and Tanya Plibersek, then opposition spokeswoman for women, made reference to the ­allegations dozens of times during question time in February and March 2021.

The text messages reveal Mr Sharaz appeared to be in direct contact with both Mr Albanese and Ms Plibersek.

On April 16, 2021 Mr Sharaz texted Ms Higgins: “So Albo gave me his number – he just came in to do the breakfast show – and says if you meet with Scomo to let him know and he’ll fly to Canberra to be there if you want to meet with him too.”

Ms Higgins responded: “For sure. I have no qualms meeting with Albo.”

On April 22, Mr Sharaz texted Ms Higgins, “Friday 9am with Albo locked in at CPO. Details to come. A minute later Mr Sharaz texts: “Tanya too.”

Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz agreed to meet Mr Morrison.

On March 26, 2021, Ms Higgins said of Mr Morrison: “He’s about to be f..ked over. Just wait. We’ve got him.”

Mr Sharaz: “Will you explain when I see you?”

Ms Higgins: “Yes.”

It is believed Ms Higgins was referring to their belief that Mr Morrison’s office had been “backgrounding” against them.

‘I still hate the c…’

Mr Sharaz made frequent disparaging remarks about the then prime minister at one point telling Higgins: “I still hate the c…”.

Over the course of six days in February following Ms Higgins’ revelations, Senator Gallagher asked 11 questions without notice in the Senate on the issue, including whether Senator Reynolds had “implicitly encouraged her former staff member not to pursue the incident with police?”

In text messages seen by The Australian, Mr Sharaz told Ms Higgins on February 21, 2021, a week after The Project interview aired, that Senator Gallagher would be making a speech the following day and asking if she could call to “clarify facts”.

The following day Senator Gallagher spoke in the Senate about “this terrible incident (which) happened in Senator Reynolds’s office” and gave a factually incorrect account of events, including that Ms Higgins “had already independently spoken to police days” before Senator Reynolds and her chief of staff Fiona Brown moved to ensure Ms Higgins was given access to the police.

“According to Ms Higgins, the access to police in the 1 April meeting was couched in terms of: ‘If you go to the police, you must let us know when you do.’ There was no offer of going with her, of supporting her, of sitting with her.” Senator Gallagher said.

In fact, Ms Brown suggested going to the police as soon as she became aware there might have been an assault, organised the meeting with the AFP, located the offices in the Parliament House basement and accompanied Ms Higgins to those offices. Ms Brown offered to sit with her in the meeting or outside the room, and to come back and collect her. Ms Higgins declined those offers.

‘Feed everything to Katy’

When Ms Higgins suspected someone from the Prime Minister’s office had been “backgrounding” against them, she texted Mr Sharaz asking if they could “at least get Katy to ask about it in estimates”.

“You may as well feed everything you have to Katy,” she said. “The sooner we can nip it in the bud the better. Especially if we can call them out by name.”

Mr Sharaz responded: “I’ve texted katy and SHY (Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young).”

Senator Gallagher was responsible for the department that paid out a confidential settlement believed to be up to $3m to Ms Higgins in December over her claim she was not properly supported by Senator Reynolds and others after the ­alleged sexual assault.

The Albanese government barred Senator Reynolds from providing evidence in the case, threatening to tear up an agreement to pay her legal fees unless she agreed not to attend the one-day mediation, meaning that Ms Higgins’ claims of mistreatment in Senator Reynolds' office were not contested.

At the time, Mr Albanese declined to answer questions about whether it was a conflict of interest for Senator Gallagher to have oversight of the deal, given her earlier engagement on the issue and whether she should ­recuse herself from any involvement in it.

A spokesperson for Senator Gallagher has previously told The Australian: “The Minister for Finance has no decision-making role in processes around significant legal matters.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18966099

File: ad59ce78ac230ba⋯.jpg (103.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese.jpg)

File: d1447e889f36167⋯.jpg (82.25 KB,768x1024,3:4,Text_messages_between_Davi….jpg)

File: 5fc04c2f6c300e3⋯.jpg (102.42 KB,768x1024,3:4,Text_messages_between_Davi….jpg)

>>18966097

3/4

The spokesperson said 11 questions posed by The Australian “should be redirected to the Attorney-General or his department as they relate to a significant matter under a legal services direction or legal processes”.

A spokesperson for Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus declined to answer any of the questions, saying only: “The parties have agreed that the terms of the settlement be confidential. All claims against the commonwealth are handled in accordance with the Legal Services Directions 2017.”

The payout may be the subject of a probe by the new national anti-corruption commission when it begins operations on July 1, according to some reports, with Senator Reynolds understood to be ready to lodge a referral.

‘She’s pretty savage politically’

The texts seen by The Australian show that on May 5, 2021 Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz again discussed the backgrounding issue after Mr Morrison’s chief of staff John Kunkel had made contact with Ms Higgins. The couple were apparently unhappy at the approach. The following day Mr Sharaz asked Ms Higgins: “Should we get Katy Gallagher’s advice re kunkel? She’s pretty savage politically haha”

Mr Sharaz discussed giving someone in the media a “drop” on the material, but Ms Higgins said: “He’ll just deny he confirmed anything. These meetings are more in their interest than ours. I’ll just brief it out to Tanya and get her advice.”

Mr Sharaz responded: “Plibersek? That’s a good idea.”

Three days after The Project interview aired, Ms Plibersek had praised Ms Higgins in parliament, “Speaking about a crime that happened to you shouldn’t require bravery, but, sadly, for survivors of sexual assault, it still does.”

Ms Plibersek featured in several later conversations, with references to her being consulted early in 2022 about allegations of misconduct being made by ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold.

On April 20, 2022 Ms Higgins sends ABC chief political correspondent Laura Tingle a Whats­App message saying she was going to lodge a formal complaint with the AFP that day over its release of her counselling notes to Mr Lehrmann’s legal team.

Ms Higgins wrote: “These are the notes compiled by the DPP Shane Drumgold in relation to the police misconduct. Tanya P is across the detail as I looped her in earlier this year if you’d like to speak about it off the record with someone.”

The DPP had given Ms Higgins the documents “to help with the complaint” against police, she said.

‘Yet another Brittany fan…’

The text messages reveal a central role played by Mr Sharaz as a “conduit” to Ms Higgins. Mr Sharaz’s role was also revealed by series of earlier emails between him and Ms Wilkinson headed: “MeToo Liberal Party Project Pitch”

After The Project, Mr Sharaz corresponded, on behalf of Ms Higgins, with Wilkinson, Peter FitzSimons (who was arranging a book deal for Ms Higgins), journalists including Samantha Maiden, David Crowe, David Speers, and others.

Mr Sharaz texted Ms Higgins about “Yet another Brittany fan…”

It is a text former deputy Liberal leader Julie Bishop sent to Wilkinson: “Hi Lisa, I watched your interview with Brittany ­Higgins last night and sadly, I was not surprised but I was deeply upset … I would love to reach out to her to tell how much I admire her courage.”

Ms Bishop said: “I’m here for her” and passes on her mobile number.

Ms Bishop was one of the people raised during the five-hour recorded conversation that took place on January 27, 2021 as a possible “friendly” to keep the story going, though Wilkinson can be heard expressing her disappointment.

Mr Sharaz appeared to act as go-between between Ms Higgins and ACT Victims of Crime ­Commissioner Heidi Yates too.

On April 27, he sent Ms Higgins a screen shot and a note saying: “Heidi made this offer for you. I mentioned on the phone that you’ve gotta come to Canberra for the police, which is how she knows/cares.”

Mr Sharaz also texted Ms ­Higgins about “Malcolm” – presumably former Liberal leader Malcolm Turnbull who was raised as a possible friendly supporter during the five-hour audio.

Ms Higgins replied: That’s very kind. Getting the tick of approval from Malcolm is lovely.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18966103

File: e81ef2746b36253⋯.jpg (91.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann.jpg)

File: 7bf4f8ed9b99614⋯.jpg (84.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,_Feed_it_to_Katy_Higgins_S….jpg)

File: fb82d2719174dce⋯.jpg (129.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,_Feed_it_to_Katy_Higgins_S….jpg)

>>18966099

4/4

EDITORIAL

Texts show probe is needed into Higgins’ compensation award

The emergence of highly charged text messages between Brittany Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz raises important questions about the behaviour of senior political figures that must be answered. The plotting and conversations revealed in the text messages are of vital public interest. They go to the heart of how politics is played and how events that are the proper preserve of the criminal justice system can be exploited for personal and political gain. The extent of what appears to be collusion between Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz and political figures demands that a proper investigation be launched into a decision to award more than $2m in compensation to Ms Higgins with what could be considered a questionable regard for proper process. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher is responsible for the department that paid the confidential settlement over the claim by Ms Higgins that she was not properly supported by her then boss, senator and former defence minister Linda Reynolds, and others after the ­alleged sexual assault.

The Albanese government barred Senator Reynolds from providing evidence in the case, threatening to tear up an agreement to pay her legal fees unless she agreed not to attend the one-day mediation. A spokesman for Senator Gallagher has previously told The Australian: “The Minister for Finance has no decision-making role in processes around significant legal matters.” The spokesperson said 11 questions posed by The Australian “should be redirected to the Attorney-General or his department”. However, a spokesperson for Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus declined to answer any of the questions, saying: “The parties have agreed that the terms of the settlement be confidential. All claims against the commonwealth are handled in accordance with the Legal Services Directions 2017.”

Given what is now known, it is vital that a thorough investigation take place. Senator Reynolds has said she will refer the matter to the newly formed national anti-corruption commission when it begins operations in July if no one else does.

The previously unseen text messages suggest Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz directly enlisted the help of senior Labor figures to pursue Ms Higgins’s rape allegations and the alleged attempt to cover up the rape to damage the Coalition government. The texts reveal Mr Sharaz, a former journalist, arranging “drops” for favoured reporters, organising meetings with Labor MPs to bolster support for Ms Higgins’s claims against the Morrison government and boasting of his special relationship with now-Finance Minister Senator Gallagher. Mr Sharaz boasts that Senator Gallagher was an “old friend”.

The text messages reveal Mr Sharaz arranging meetings with major political figures following the public revelations, including with the then opposition leader, Anthony Albanese, and Labor frontbencher Tanya Plibersek. Mr Albanese and Ms Plibersek made reference to the allegations dozens of times during question time in February and March 2021. On March 26, 2021, Ms Higgins boasts that then prime minister Scott Morrison is “about to be f..ked over”. “We’ve got him,” she says, according to an account of the texts.

We accept that the text messages between Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz present only one side of events. Public figures deserve a forum to put all the facts on the table. But we believe the contents of the text message conversations are of vital public importance and we publish them in the public interest so Australians can properly scrutinise them. A proper inquiry must be held into the extent of what appears to be political collusion on the Higgins rape allegations. Taxpayers deserve to know how the decision was made to award Ms Higgins millions of dollars in compensation and exactly who was involved.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-david-sharaz-texts-reveal-politics-plots-over-bruce-lehrmann-rape-allegations/news-story/be8a97ca58363be5eb677db502cbe6d2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971017

File: 14eedaa2457f7e9⋯.jpg (70.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_of_Australi….jpg)

File: 5c6ce01b4fba844⋯.jpg (134.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Prime_Minister_Anthony….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Anthony Albanese defends Katy Gallagher amid involvement with Brittany Higgins allegation and compensation

TRICIA RIVERA - JUNE 8, 2023

1/2

Pressure is mounting for Anthony Albanese and key ministers in his government to disclose whether they had any involvement in helping Brittany Higgins pursue her rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann after it was revealed the former political staffer and her boyfriend David Sharaz strategised how to make use of senior Labor figures.

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher sits at the centre of the pair’s scheming, with Mr Sharaz having boasted about his friendship with the senator to Ms Higgins.

Texts published in The Australian reveal Mr Sharaz and Senator Gallagher were in touch and that she was “angry and wants to help” before the rape allegation was made public.

It contradicts her strong assertion made in June 2021 that she did not know of the allegations and their planned use.

“No-one had any knowledge. How dare you,’’ Senator Gallagher said in response to the claim put forward by former Defence Minister Linda Reynolds.

The Prime Minister on Thursday defended Senator Gallagher but avoided a question put to him on whether or not she had misled the parliament.

“I have absolute confidence in Senator Gallagher,” he said in a press conference.

Mr Albanese clarified the first time he met Ms Higgins and said that it would be “entirely inappropriate” for him to refer the matter to the new National Anti-Corruption Commission which will be in operation from next month.

“I don’t take advice from anyone … I had not met Brittany Higgins until I met her, publicly, on the same day that she met Scott Morrison,” he said.

“One of the things about the Anti-Corruption Commission that people mightn‘t have noticed in the Coalition is that it’s independent of parliamentarians.

“In fact, it could be regarded as an entirely inappropriate action by the prime minister or any other politician for that matter, to try to direct the Anti-Corruption Commission into what to do.”

Mr Albanese shot back when he was probed on if he thought Ms Higgins‘ compensation payment could be investigated by the anti-corruption body.

“I just answered the question. You‘re asking me to do something that is entirely inappropriate because the Anti-Corruption Commission is independent of politics. That’s the idea. If it’s in with politics, that itself is the problem.”

The question portion of the press conference was shorter than normal with the Prime Minister taking just three questions into the matter.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971030

File: 624bac3a2bf1374⋯.jpg (183.79 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Brittany_Higgins_and_partn….jpg)

>>18971017

2/2

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said that Anthony Albanese and Senator Gallagher had to be upfront and honest about the “serious allegations” levelled at them.

“There’s a multimillion- dollar payout. You’ve got the Finance Minister, who, on the advice of some, has misled the parliament, a very serious allegation,” he said in press conference in Queensland.

“I think in the end, what Australians don’t like are tricky and deceptive politicians and I think the Prime Minister and Katie Gallagher need to tell the truth about their involvement.”

Mr Dutton supported former defence minister Linda Reynolds in offering to refer the matter to (NACC).

“Linda Reynolds is a person of great honour and she feels rightly aggrieved in the process here and she‘s asking for an independent analysis assessment of what’s happened,” he said.

“You have tape recordings, you have text messages, you have other details being discovered, and it doesn‘t accord with the public accounts of some senior members of the Albanese government.”

The Liberal Leader said it would be up to NACC on what they would choose to investigate.

“We‘re talking about senior ministers of government potentially having conspired or at least having collaborated with individuals and a lot of that needs to be explained.”

Television presenter Lisa Wilkinson also singled out Environment Minister Plibersek as a “friendly MP” likely to help build momentum around the rape allegation during Question Time.

Ms Plibersek denied any involvement.

“Nobody tells me what to ask in question time. I reached out to check on her. She did not reach out to me,” Ms Plibersek told Sunrise earlier this week.

“I don‘t recall anything like that. She was [a] very upset and fragile young woman that I was checking on. That’s my involvement here.”

On the commonwealth compensation payout to Ms Higgins, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said he was “absolutely” comfortable with settlement and that there was nothing to hide.

“The decision that I made to settle this claim was entirely in accordance with the legal services direction that applied to the settlement of this kind of case for decades,” he told Today on Thursday.

“It‘s absolutely standard that, in some cases, there’s confidentiality. That’s what’s happened here.”

Like the Prime Minister, Attorney-General Dreyfus came to Senator Gallagher’s defence and claimed she had “no part to play”.

Independent MP Dai Le also spoke of the alleged collusion between Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz and politicians and said the allegation was weaponised against the former Coalition government.

“From my perspective – this is politics, right? The opposition in this case, now the government, will be always looking for things to use as a weapon against its government of the day,” she told Today.

“So I think it‘s something that [this] is not new in politics.”

Ms Le said she would like to hear from the people allegedly involved such as Finance Minister Katy Gallagher and Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek.

“Look, [Anthony Albanese] is the leader of the Labor Party, I don‘t think he’s in the clear,” she said.

“ … They have used this to really weaponise the other side and somebody has to answer for it.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-defends-katy-gallagher-amid-involvement-with-brittany-higgins-allegation-and-compensation/news-story/1c35220e2bea7124c211c3f951dd0102

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971045

File: ef85506c33454e5⋯.jpg (87.84 KB,1024x768,4:3,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: 4c3fe2b5779e7c6⋯.jpg (92.61 KB,1280x720,16:9,Finance_Minister_Katy_Gall….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Peter Dutton backs move to refer Brittany Higgins’ settlement to the National Anti-Corruption Commission

Catie McLeod - June 8, 2023

1/2

Peter Dutton has backed a move to refer the confidential Commonwealth payout made to former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins to the new federal integrity watchdog for investigation.

The Opposition Leader told 2GB Radio on Thursday that Anthony Albanese and other senior figures in the federal government had questions to answer about the payout and what they knew about Ms Higgins’ rape allegation and when.

“It just seems that as each day goes by, there are more questions than there are answers and I think that’s creating a lot of suspicion understandably,” Mr Dutton said.

Ms Higgins reached a settlement with the Commonwealth in December last year after she launched legal action against her employers the former Coalition government over their handling of her rape allegation.

Mr Dutton said he thought the new National Anti-Corruption Commission, due to be operational next month, would have an interest in looking at the “sequence of events” that led to Ms Higgins’ payout.

“Because, if there is a question about the process involved in a payout or there is a question around the Prime Minister’s own words in relation to this … they’re very serious allegations,” he said.

Mr Dutton made the remarks after former Coalition minister Linda Reynolds said she might ask the NACC to investigate the government’s decision to award compensation to Ms Higgins, her former staffer.

Ms Higgins alleged she was raped in 2019 by her colleague Bruce Lehrmann inside Senator Reynolds’ ministerial office when they were both working for the former defence minister.

Mr Lehrmann has always denied Ms Higgins’ allegation and pleaded not guilty. He was not required to give evidence in his trial in the ACT Supreme Court last year that was derailed by juror misconduct before prosecutors later dropped the charges against him.

Fresh media reports of leaked text messages between Ms Higgins and her partner David Sharaz suggest the pair discussed strategizing with Finance Minister Katy Gallagher when she was a Labor frontbencher in opposition.

Senator Gallagher had previously said she didn’t know about the alleged sexual assault until the story broke.

In June 2021, she responded with outrage when she was asked in parliament whether she knew about Ms Higgins’ allegations before the former staffer came forward.

At the time, Senator Reynolds claimed she had been tipped off to Labor being aware of the allegation before it became public knowledge.

An indignant Senator Gallagher responded by saying: “No one had any knowledge. How dare you.”

Now finance minister, Senator Gallagher is responsible for the department that paid the confidential settlement to Ms Higgins.

Senator Gallagher told ABC Radio on Wednesday that she had “absolutely no role” in processing or paying out Ms Higgins’ compensation claim.

Asked about her relationship with Mr Sharaz, she said she had known him when he was a journalist in Canberra and she was the ACT chief minister.

“But I have nothing further to add. My statements are all on the record, and I’m comfortable with those,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971047

File: 55d25acb5d46f1b⋯.jpg (110.26 KB,1024x768,4:3,Bruce_Lehrmann_s_trial_in_….jpg)

>>18971045

2/2

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus rejected suggestions the government had any questions to answer about the settlement paid to Ms Higgins that he said was “entirely in accordance” with the law.

“It’s very common for the Commonwealth to settle claims on the basis of agreed confidentiality,” he told Nine’s Today Show on Thursday.

“It’s very often in the Commonwealth’s interests that there be confidentiality and, often in the case of sexual harassment claims, there is a desire on the part of the claimant to keep the matter confidential.”

Mr Dreyfus said he was “absolutely” confident the government had nothing to hide.

Asked on ABC News Breakfast if the newly published text messages between Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz raised any questions about the actions of then Labor frontbenchers that needed to be investigated, Mr Dreyfus said: “No. Just no.”

The amount of the Ms Higgins’ settlement was kept confidential, but it is reportedly estimated to be worth up to $3m. She reportedly donated a portion of her payout to the Canberra Rape Crisis Centre.

Later on Thursday, Mr Albanese brushed off questions about whether the process that led to Ms Higgins’ settlement could be investigated by the NACC by saying it was inappropriate for politicians to try to direct the actions of the integrity commission.

“It, in fact, could be regarded as an entirely inappropriate action by the prime minister or any other politician for that matter to try to direct the anti-corruption commission into what to do. We set it up as an independent body,” he said

“You’re asking me to do something that is entirely inappropriate because the anti-corruption commission is independent of politics. That’s the idea. If it’s in with politics, that itself is a problem.”

Mr Dreyfus said earlier on Thursday that anyone was welcome to refer matters to the NACC, which was on track to be up and running from July 1.

“It’ll be independent and a matter for the National Anti-Corruption Commission to decide what and how it will investigate,” he told Today.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/peter-dutton-backs-move-to-refer-brittany-higgins-settlement-to-the-national-anticorruption-commission/news-story/7dde70754146bb1e9997dce7f7107543

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971069

File: 9e7240f52a4fb86⋯.jpg (636.26 KB,2362x1614,1181:807,Yunupingu_with_former_prim….jpg)

File: 7ee8d8eb479ae19⋯.jpg (4.16 MB,8256x4644,16:9,Northern_Territory_land_co….jpg)

File: df6c35bc628f14b⋯.jpg (1.36 MB,2289x2268,109:108,The_Barunga_Statement_in_P….jpg)

>>18928670

‘We are the voice from the bush’: Spirit of Yunupingu to spur Yes campaign

Paul Sakkal - June 7, 2023

Australians will be asked to embrace the idea of an Indigenous Voice to parliament in a historic call from Northern Territory land councils to mark the 35th anniversary of the landmark Barunga Statement.

Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney will travel to the Northern Territory later this week to attend the Barunga festival – more than three decades after then-prime minister Bob Hawke was handed the famous treaty request by esteemed rights activist, the late Yunupingu, at the same event.

A historic meeting of all four Northern Territory land councils is on Wednesday expected to finalise the wording of what will be called the Barunga Declaration, which its authors hope will capture the attention of Australians and channel Yunupingu’s spirit toward winning this year’s referendum.

Burney said she was honoured to speak at the festival on an important anniversary of the Barunga Statement.

“To do so at a defining moment in our country’s history, ahead of the Voice referendum, makes it even more special,” she said.

“I’m looking forward to renewing the promise of Barunga in 2023, as we walk together to a better future for all Australians.”

The Northern and Central land councils hailed the meeting of the groups as historic and said the gathering of more than 150 land council members helped show the grassroots support for the Voice, which has been questioned by Voice opponents who have described Yes campaigners as elitist.

“We are talking strong, as cultural people elected to represent our land and sea country, our communities and our families,” a statement from the councils said. “We are the voice from the bush and we support the Voice to parliament.”

Djawa Yunupingu, a senior member of the Gumatj clan and a brother of Yunupingu, is involved in the preparation of the declaration.

The annual Barunga festival, held in a small community on Jawoyn land east of Katherine, involves cultural events, Australian rules football matches, music and dance.

Burney will travel to Barunga as the Yes campaign – which has been criticised for lacking momentum – prepares to ramp up its efforts after multiple polls showed dropping support for the referendum, which is likely to be held in October.

Speaking at Yunupingu’s funeral last month, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton described the trailblazing land rights activist and 1978 Australian of the Year as a giant of Australian history.

Albanese has spoken with emotion when citing a conversation he’d had with Yunupingu at last year’s Garma Festival.

The elder, whose name means “sacred rock that stands against time” in a dialect of the Yolngu Matha language, took Albanese aside after the Labor leader announced the words he proposed to add to the Constitution.

According to Albanese, Yunupingu took his hand and asked if he truly intended to pursue constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians. Albanese promised he would follow through, unlike leaders including Hawke who were unable to fulfil promises to Yunupingu.

When Hawke was deposed by Paul Keating in 1991, he insisted his final act must be to keep an old promise to Yunupingu to unveil the Barunga Statement in Parliament House.

The bark painting now sits in parliament’s Great Hall, carrying 11 dot points and a handful of paragraphs that call for a treaty, self-determination, and a “national elected Aboriginal and Islander organisation to oversee Aboriginal and Islander affairs”.

“And we call on the Commonwealth parliament to negotiate with us a treaty recognising our prior ownership, continued occupation and sovereignty and affirming our human rights and freedom,” it states.

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/federal/we-are-the-voice-from-the-bush-spirit-of-yunupingu-to-spur-yes-campaign-20230606-p5def0.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971082

File: 86948c6f50940ac⋯.jpg (115.95 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australia_cannot_turn_back….jpg)

File: a663e1ec817f40b⋯.jpg (152.09 KB,768x1024,3:4,Ian_Trust.jpg)

>>18928670

The Indigenous voice to parliament could be a new remedy for Aboriginal disadvantage

IAN TRUST - JUNE 8, 2023

1/2

It was 1967. I was 16 and walking with friends to the basketball court in Halls Creek, an old goldmining town in the far north of Western Australia. I had just finished school in Wyndham and was holidaying in my former home town. We passed a half-dozen Aboriginal people who were walking to the local hotel shouting, “We are free, We are free!”

None of us understood what they were talking about until one of the joyous group explained they had discovered that day that they were now legally allowed to drink alcohol without having to obtain their citizenship rights.

Halls Creek at the time was a magical place; it had few opportunities but also little crime. In fact the town’s crime rate in 1967 was below the state average; domestic violence, child abuse and youth suicide were unheard of, mainly due to functional two-parent families. Aboriginal stockmen were the backbone of the beef industry and with their RM Wil­liams boots and cowboy hats were the Michael Jordans of the day.

When I look back on that day and the cry “We are free”, I cannot help but lament the enormity of those three words. I wonder if it was the start of a process that has locked many of my people in a downward spiral and a self-imposed prison we are still unable to escape from.

The patterns that upheld the norms and values that maintained our families for thousands of years started to come apart, slowly at first but gathering pace; a pace no one, or no amount of money, seemed able to stop.

The reason this was happening to Aboriginal people in the Kimberley was the introduction of the basic wage, the mass redundancy from pastoral stations that followed, and the introduction of social security payments and alcohol. These factors caused a tidal wave of change in a very short time that affected the most vulnerable members of society, with catastrophic consequences.

The biggest loser was the Aboriginal male. From a proud man vital to the only industry in the Kimberley, and the foundation of Aboriginal families for millennia, he was relegated to a beggar who had to go cap in hand to his wife who, if they had children, received more money in benefits than he did.

With limited education, no job and no role or purpose in life, he had no economic status in his family and was no longer required by the industry he had built. As a consequence domestic violence increased to terrible proportions, as did the Aboriginal prison population. Fractured families increased and the number of Aboriginal children in out-of-home care grew exponentially.

Indigenous people currently receive $32bn a year in aid to solve these problems, but there is no real solution in sight. There have been many policies and strategies over the years but, despite the goodwill of governments and an army of dedicated service providers, little has changed. There are, of course, many Aboriginal families who have done well – mine included – but many more who haven’t.

I know we cannot turn back time and recapture the magic of Halls Creek and other small towns around 1967 Australia. But we can rethink our strategies and how we help Aboriginal Australians share the nation’s wealth. After 55 years of trying everything to close the gap, to little effect, maybe it’s time we give Aboriginal people a chance to give the decision-makers some advice through a voice.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971086

File: 79d2ff4e3800c12⋯.jpg (106.14 KB,1024x768,4:3,A_sign_showing_that_alcoho….jpg)

>>18971082

2/2

It is a fundamental truth that the building blocks for all great societies are strong families that have discipline and structure, based on routines that produce positive outcomes. This is the principle of the path and, with few exceptions, all those who follow the path will succeed.

Many of our communities are struggling with overwhelming social issues and we cannot pull ourselves up by our bootstraps, as the advocates of self-determination believe, and we will require leadership from within and outside.

The voice could be an advocate in such circumstances, providing advice to government on what it could do to create the social and economic environment that enables families to succeed.

The voice proposal does not infringe on the rights of other Australians, nor should it. It is a genuine attempt to right many wrongs and create the mechanism to allow Aboriginal Australians to initiate strategies they feel will make a difference for their people. You could describe it as a mechanism for increasing their involvement in the democratic process.

How it is implemented is crucial to how effective it will be; that is why I believe we do need broad political support and involvement in shaping the voice. To continue to deliver programs as we have done since 1967 is akin to moving the deck chairs on the Titanic.

We must change the direction of the ship, as it is costing huge amounts of money, affecting lives and damaging the future of countless innocent children who deserve a better life than we currently offer them.

There are no simple solutions to achieving real change: some decisions will need to be made that will not be popular or achieve immediate results. Maybe Australia has come to a fork in the road in its relationship with Aboriginal people, and we need to consider what outcomes we would like to see 50 years from now?

If we don’t do anything different from what we have done previously, nothing can change.

If you live in regional Australia the issues that are creating divisions in the community are not based on political structures in Perth or Canberra but the growing incidence of crime and anti-social behaviour. These things I believe are symptoms of wider issues, but unless we create a mechanism to listen to the voices who say we must do something, nothing can change.

The two questions I believe Australians should consider at the referendum are “What should we do?” or the more empowering question, “Who do we want to be?”

I hope our answer to the second question will lead us to the conclusion that if most of the things we have tried in the past have not worked, and if we would like Aboriginal people to enjoy a better life, we will support the Indigenous voice to parliament.

Ian Trust is chairman of Empowered Communities.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-could-be-a-new-remedy-for-aboriginal-disadvantage/news-story/08197759a2dc5f8329e3b1a31d5ea886

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971099

File: 935c4d5a789c355⋯.jpg (154.45 KB,1280x720,16:9,An_Aboriginal_Voting_right….jpg)

>>18928670

The powerful enjoy special access; Aboriginal people should too, through an Indigenous voice to parliament

IAN TEMBY - JUNE 8, 2023

The Indigenous voice to parliament will simply give Australia’s Aboriginal people the same access to Canberra as is now enjoyed by very many lobby groups. The same access but less power.

The coal industry, the gas industry, manufacturers, irrigators, cotton and rice farmers, banks, the superannuation industry, doctors, lawyers, pharmacists, the media (each of print, television and radio) and countless others have a presence in the nation’s capital or visit often. Some do it through senior executives. Most employ professional lobbyists.

They make representations in relation to legislation and policies. Which is to say, to parliament and to ministers and senior bureaucrats. All the time they are seeking to create a climate favourable to their constituents.

If the referendum succeeds, the original inhabitants of this country, through their chosen representatives, will have the guaranteed right to lobby for better outcomes than at present. And if all the other interest groups can do this, why not them?

Further, it is twisted logic to say, as some have, that the voice will be a “Canberra” voice. The opposite is true: unlike the armies of high-paid lobbyists who populate the rarefied air of our national capital, the people elected to the voice will be drawn from all regions across Australia, with specific provision for age and gender balance.

What do the rest of us have to worry about? Eminent constitutional scholars assure us the voice as proposed is consistent with the country’s founding document. They include two former chief justices of Australia – Murray Gleeson and Robert French – at least one other former High Court justice – Kenneth Hayne, who is hardly “woke” – and others such as Bret Walker KC.

Nobody of any standing is opposed to recognition in the Constitution of the Aboriginal people as the country’s first inhabitants. So that leaves the practical measure that is proposed – the voice itself. Surely to lift up our most marginalised citizens, so they can lobby just as the powerful can, is a reasonable course of action.

For as long as can be envisaged, Aboriginal people will remain less powerful than existing interest groups, which have always had all the access they want. Why? Because, unlike most of the others, Indigenous Australians lack lots of money and entrenched influence.

Those who represent the Aboriginal people will never be able to pull strings by way of political donations. But they do seek a seat at the table where decisions affecting them are made. We, the Australian people, ought to give them that seat, that access: the voice.

Some who urge a No vote in the referendum say it would introduce a race component into the Constitution. They need to learn their history. From the outset in 1901, the Constitution empowered the parliament to make laws with respect to the people of any race. It still does. And until 1967, when it was removed following a successful referendum, the Constitution provided that “aboriginal natives shall not be counted”. Since then, Indigenous Australians have been counted, have had the vote. Common decency requires that we give this group of our citizens the voice they seek.

Why single out Indigenous Australians (rather than other disadvantaged minorities)? Because our historical failure to even recognise their existence, and the evident failure in our efforts to understand and address their needs – to “close the gap” – demands that we do something significant, extra and permanent.

If all the privileged have access to parliament, ministers and the bureaucracy, why can’t we agree to guaranteed access by the least powerful among us – those who experience the worst outcomes in life expectancy, deaths in custody, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, education levels, unemployment and alcoholism. A better way is essential.

Ian Temby AO KC was the first commonwealth director of public prosecutions and the first commissioner of the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-powerful-enjoy-special-access-aboriginal-people-should-too-through-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/227a6eb4c70a6b19e771ff17d6f2f208

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971108

File: f4e9515b033bf70⋯.mp4 (10.15 MB,640x360,16:9,Australia_to_ban_swastika_….mp4)

Australia to ban swastika, SS sign citing rise of far-right

Renju Jose - June 8, 2023

SYDNEY, June 8 (Reuters) - Australia said on Thursday it would introduce laws to the parliament next week banning public displays and sales of Nazi hate symbols, citing a rise in far-right activities at home.

The swastika, one of the most recognisable symbols of Nazi propaganda, and the insignia of Schutzstaffel (SS), the paramilitary wing of the Nazi party, will be outlawed to be used as flags and armbands or printed on clothes.

"We've seen, very sadly, a rise in people displaying these vile symbols, which are symbols that have no place in Australia, they should be repugnant," Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus told Channel Seven television.

"Regrettably, we have seen violence associated with some of the public events that these people have put on."

A ban on the Nazi salute will not be added to the federal law, the attorney-general said. He said state and territory governments can enforce that ban in a more effective way.

"State governments have got more responsibility for what you might call street offences, and our law goes to public display and includes online … the salute we've left for the states."

Australia's spy agency has been warning far-right groups were on the rise in Australia and that they had become more organised and visible.

In March, a group of neo-Nazis clashed with transgender rights protesters in Melbourne and was seen raising their arms in a Nazi salute near the state parliament building. Last year, a soccer fan who gave the salute at the Australia Cup final was banned for life from any games sanctioned by Football Australia.

Dreyfus said all Australian states and territories had either passed laws or announced plans to ban Nazi symbols, and the proposed federal laws will mesh with the states'.

Offenders can get up to 12 months in prison, he said.

There will be exemptions for artistic, academic or religious use of swastikas, which has a spiritual significance in Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australia-ban-swastika-ss-sign-citing-rise-far-right-2023-06-08/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971120

File: ff0a3d17f0e88c0⋯.jpg (654.17 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Shadow_ministers_Simon_Bir….jpg)

File: df748bbf0b009f2⋯.jpg (8.16 MB,8008x5339,8008:5339,A_Ukrainian_soldier_fires_….jpg)

>>18949906

>>18960257

‘Not pulling our weight’: Bipartisanship collapses over Ukraine support

Matthew Knott - June 7, 2023

A fight has erupted between the major parties over Australian support for Ukraine’s war against Russia, with the federal opposition declaring it embarrassing that Ukrainian officials have been forced to resort to social media posts to plead for more military assistance from the Albanese government.

In the Coalition’s strongest criticism yet of the government’s Ukraine policy, opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham and defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said they were concerned that Australia was no longer pulling its weight when it came to supporting Ukraine’s military efforts.

With Ukraine’s crucial spring counter-offensive already under way, the shadow ministers called for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to announce a new package of assistance urgently rather than hold it to “ransom until he has a media opportunity at the upcoming NATO summit” in Lithuania next month.

“Despite the early action of the former Coalition government, and our continued bipartisan support for actions of this government, Australia’s commitments have failed to keep pace with our partners,” Birmingham and Hastie wrote in a letter to Defence Minister Richard Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Wednesday.

“Other non-NATO contributors now increasingly overshadow Australia’s support.”

The comments mark a breakdown in the bipartisan approach to Ukraine that typified the first year of the conflict – a period during which Labor and the Coalition worked together to present a united front against Vladimir Putin’s invasion and declined to criticise each other.

Birmingham and Hastie said they “share the growing concerns of many in the Australian-Ukrainian community and, it would seem, the government of Ukraine that Australia is no longer pulling our weight commensurate with the efforts of our partners”.

“The dwindling and ad-hoc nature of Australian military support announced by the Albanese government has seen an embarrassing situation emerge where the Ukrainian government has resorted to launching public campaigns for more Australian military equipment,” the shadow ministers wrote in the letter.

Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence posted videos to Twitter in April and May pleading for Australia to provide a supply of Hawkei protected mobility vehicles, while Ukrainian Defence Minister Oleksiy Reznikov posted a video last week urging Australia to donate tanks to Ukraine.

Australia has provided $510 million in military assistance to Ukraine, but the only aid announced this year was a $33 million donation of unarmed drones in February.

This masthead reported on Tuesday that Australia is set to supply a batch of Hawkeis as part of a forthcoming support package, despite concerns from within the Australian Defence Force that the new vehicles are not ready for operations because of problems with their braking system.

Army Major General Andrew Bottrell told Senate estimates last week that “it’s been my advice to Defence that we could not sustain this vehicle overseas, and we certainly could not sustain it if we were also trying to roll it out to the Australian Defence Force”.

Still, Hastie and Birmingham said: “We urge the swift announcement of a new and comprehensive package of Australian military, humanitarian and energy assistance to Ukraine, underpinned by thorough consideration of each of the Ukrainian government’s specific requests, including for Hawkeis, M1 Abrams tanks, F/A-18 Hornets and de-mining equipment/detectors.

“If these capabilities cannot be made available to the Ukrainian government, then we urge this government to explain why and provide alternate support.”

They said the timing of announcements “should not be beholden to media schedules or ministerial visits, such as prime minister’s planned visit to the NATO leaders’ summit”.

A spokeswoman for Marles said: “It is disappointing the Coalition are seeking to play politics with such an important matter.

“The government has engaged the Coalition in briefings and the like, to ensure there is bipartisan support on this issue.”

Birmingham and Hastie also questioned why Australia had not re-opened its embassy in Kyiv despite the fact more than 60 other nations, including the United Kingdom and United States, had already done so.

Former Victorian state MP Tim Smith, who travelled to Ukraine this week, said it was a “disgrace” that Australia has not re-opened the embassy.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/not-pulling-our-weight-bipartisanship-collapses-over-ukraine-support-20230607-p5derg.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18971125

File: 77ae05141695694⋯.jpg (879.18 KB,3600x2400,3:2,The_RAAF_retired_its_F_A_1….jpg)

>>18949906

>>18960257

Retired Australian F/A-18 Hornet jets a step closer to joining Ukraine's war effort

Andrew Greene - 8 June 2023

Kyiv has assured the White House that it would not deploy second-hand Australian warplanes into Russian airspace if dozens of the retired F/A-18s are transferred to Ukraine.

High-level international negotiations are continuing between Australia, Ukraine, and the United States over the fate of the decommissioned fighter aircraft, in what could become this country's largest-ever single transfer of military equipment to a foreign power.

The Royal Australian Air Force's fleet of Boeing "Classic" Hornets were retired in late 2021 after almost 40 years of service, which included bombing missions in the Middle East against Islamic State.

After the FA/18s were retired, Texas-based company RAVN Aerospace paid a deposit to purchase 41 of the multi-role fighters currently housed at RAAF Base Williamtown in varying states of airworthiness.

Sources familiar with the negotiations say RAVN Aerospace is willing to "on-sell" the Hornets to Ukraine but first requires approval from the White House given the fourth-generation fighters have American intellectual property (IP).

Australia's defence department would also have to formally change its contract with RAVN given the end user is currently listed as being in the United States, not Ukraine.

Defence had been scheduled to soon begin dismantling some of the ageing Hornets for spare parts while other remaining aircraft were expected to go to the United States for training purposes.

Last month, US President Joe Biden raised Kyiv's hopes of securing fourth-generation warplanes when he told allies he was approving plans to train Ukrainian pilots on US-made F-16 fighter jets.

Next month, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to unveil a new package of military support for Ukraine, but a senior government official played down suggestions the F/A-18s would be part of the announcement.

"There are still many hurdles to clear before the F/A-18s can be sent to Ukraine," the official told the ABC, pointing to a shortage of appropriate personnel, training and a lack of spare parts.

A figure familiar with the negotiations on Australia's possible transfer of F/A-18s said Ukraine had now formally assured the White House the warplanes would only be used to defend its own territorial airspace and not be sent on missions into Russian airspace.

Frustrations are growing inside the Ukrainian community over the how long it has taken the Albanese government to unveil further support with this year's budget containing no new measures.

In a letter to Defence Minister Richard Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, the opposition has urged the government to "urgently deliver a new and comprehensive package of support to the people of Ukraine in their defence against Russia's illegal and immoral invasion".

"Australia's commitments have failed to keep pace with our partners. Other non-NATO contributors now increasingly overshadow Australia's support," Coalition frontbenchers Simon Birmingham and Andrew Hastie wrote.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-08/retired-australian-jets-step-closer-to-joining-ukraine-war/102452394

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977050

File: 07ba8269533a5a6⋯.mp4 (15.51 MB,640x360,16:9,Revealed_Brittany_Higgins_….mp4)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Sharri Markson: Deep links between Brittany Higgins and Labor show how allegations were 'exploited for political purposes'

Further revelations linking the Brittany Higgins camp to the Labor Party ahead of her rape allegations airing publicly show how senior frontbenchers “exploited” the story for political gain.

Tyrone Clarke - June 7, 2023

1/2

Brittany Higgins’ connections to the Labor Party ran deep as more fallout from the explosive Bruce Lehrmann interview continues to unravel.

Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson has again exposed another link between the ALP and Ms Higgins and her now-fiancé David Sharaz.

Recordings played during Bruce Lehrmann’s Sunday night interview with the Seven Network showed Mr Sharaz war-gaming a potential political response to the rape allegations during a meeting with Ms Higgins and Lisa Wilkinson ahead of The Project interview in March 2021.

The former Canberra journalist asked Ms Wilkinson if she had any “friendly” Labor MPs who could grill the Morrison government on the saga.

He also boasted of his friendship with now-Finance Minister Katy Gallagher and said: “I’ve got a friend in Labor, Katy Gallagher on the Labor side, who will probe and continue it going”.

On Wednesday, Markson revealed one of Ms Higgins’ closest advisors and friends was a former “senior Labor operative”.

“The connections between David Sharaz and Brittany Higgins to the Labor Party runs even deeper,” Markson said.

Emma Webster was seen throughout the Lehrmann trial side-by-side with Ms Higgins offering her support.

Ms Higgins even described the former Labor staffer as a “wise advisor”.

While Ms Webster was mentioned throughout the trial as a close friend of Ms Higgins and a lobbyist her deep Labor connections were hardly ever revealed.

Before starting at Hawker Britton as a senior lobbyist, Ms Webster was a top advisor for former prime minister Julia Gillard, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews and Ms Gallagher when she was the ACT chief minister.

When asked if she was involved in formulating the media and political response for Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz, Ms Webster told Sky News Australia: "Brittany is my friend. She told me about her alleged sexual assault, and I offered my unconditional love and support."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977054

File: 41911613972e4ab⋯.mp4 (15.54 MB,640x360,16:9,Revealed_Brittany_Higgins_….mp4)

>>18977050

2/2

Following The Project interview airing in March 2021, senior Labor frontbenchers launched countless attacks on then-prime minister Scott Morrison and his government over the handling of the affair.

The onslaught of questions in Parliament was led by Anthony Albanese, Tanya Plibersek and Ms Gallagher.

During The Project meeting, Ms Wilkinson pointed to both Ms Plibersek and Mr Albanese as possible MPs who could prosecute the government on the issue.

Ms Plibersek and Mr Albanese have both vehemently denied being coached by the Higgins camp.

The Finance Minister also addressed possible links with Mr Sharaz on Wednesday and refused to confirm whether the pair were friends.

“I knew Mr Sharaz from my previous role, he was a journalist here in Canberra when I was chief minister so I knew him but I have nothing further to add,” Ms Gallagher told ABC Radio National.

Markson said the latest connection to emerge between Ms Higgins and Labor fuelled further questions over the politicisation of the allegations.

“So a Labor operative who has worked for Daniel Andrews, Julia Gillard and Katy Gallagher has been a ‘wise adviser’ to Brittany Higgins,” she said.

“But it's becoming crystal clear that allegations of rape were readily exploited by Labor and the media for political purposes. To bring down the Morrison Government.”

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/sharri-markson-deep-links-between-brittany-higgins-and-labor-show-how-allegations-were-exploited-for-political-purposes/news-story/19a416e56d55e9b3a7afe65f04860438

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977104

File: e42d3e20d1a41b0⋯.jpg (114.44 KB,1280x720,16:9,Katy_Gallagher_during_a_co….jpg)

File: 36e6224cf64ea2b⋯.jpg (153.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_accused_B….jpg)

File: 9be1d58b55064c9⋯.jpg (125.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Katy_Gallagher_the….jpg)

File: f73d78e779ae9e2⋯.jpg (46.47 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_strenuo….jpg)

File: e1302f8210ba777⋯.jpg (70.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ms_Gallagher_went_to_groun….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Katy Gallagher accused of misleading parliament, faces referral to corruption watchdog

GEOFF CHAMBERS and ELLIE DUDLEY - JUNE 9, 2023

1/2

Katy Gallagher is facing serious claims she misled parliament over an outburst in which she rejected assertions she was tipped off about Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations in 2021, as pressure builds on Anthony Albanese over Labor’s war-gaming with Ms Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz.

The Finance Minister and senior government ministers went to ground on Thursday following the damaging fallout from text messages and audio recordings of Mr Sharaz and Ms Higgins boasting about contact and collusion with senior Labor figures.

The Australian can also reveal texts between the couple that show Mr Sharaz’s response to their growing fame after the allegations became public, with Ms Higgins’ partner telling her they “exude power” and expressing his delight at organising her private meetings with former prime ministers Kevin Rudd and Malcolm Turnbull.

Revelations in The Australian that Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz claimed to have corresponded with Senator Gallagher days before the former Liberal staffer went public with her rape claim have embroiled the Albanese government, which ran on an election platform of anti-corruption and open governance last year, in its first major integrity crisis.

Senator Gallagher, who first met Mr Sharaz as ACT chief minister a decade ago, did not answer six questions put to her by The Australian about whether she misled parliament and when or how she became aware of Ms Higgins’ allegations.

Peter Dutton said Ms Higgins’ reported $3m taxpayer-funded payout and the role played by Senator Gallagher should be referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission.

The allegation Senator Gallagher misled parliament traces back to a June 2021 Senate hearing when former defence minister Linda Reynolds claimed that senior Labor figures had been tipped off about Ms Higgins’ allegations before they were aired in the media.’

“No-one had any knowledge. How dare you!’ It’s all about protecting yourself,” Senator Gallagher shot back at Senator Reynolds, who was Ms Higgins’ boss at the time of her alleged assault by colleague Bruce Lehrmann. But text messages from February 11, 2021 – four days before Ms Higgins’ Ten Network interview went to air – show Mr Sharaz implying that Senator Gallagher did know about the allegations before they were made public and said she was “really invested” in Ms Higgins’ story.

Leaked messages obtained by The Australian also revealed on a number of occasions Mr Sharaz asked Ms Higgins: “Are you getting spotted? Are people noticing you? Anyone recognise you?”

On March 16, 2021, about a month after Ms Higgins was interviewed by Lisa Wilkinson on The Project, Mr Sharaz texted Ms Higgins to say “we exude power”.

In the months after Ms Higgins became a nationally known figure, Mr Sharaz also organised tea with Dr Rudd at his Brisbane apartment. “It’s not exactly a shack. A $10m penthouse haha,” Ms Higgins’s partner said..

On another day, he expressed delight at an invitation to see Mr Turnbull.

Senator Gallagher referred The Australian to an ABC interview from earlier in the week, after refusing to explain her relationships with Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz and whether she discussed a civil claim against the commonwealth with either of them.

Asked by the ABC about a recording of Mr Sharaz saying “I’ve got a friend in Labor, Katy Gallagher”, the Finance Minister said: “I have nothing further to add to this. Particularly it’s been raised in relation to a settlement or a compensation package in relation to Miss Higgins and that I had absolutely no role in that at all. And … I think that’s all I need to say.”

Across 2021 and 2022, Ms Higgins’ name was mentioned in Senate estimates hearings at least 338 times by senators, with Senator Gallagher referencing the former Liberal staffer on 135 occasions, or almost 40 per cent.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977113

File: 03096d38a0f2cf3⋯.mp4 (15.99 MB,640x360,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….mp4)

>>18977104

2/2

The Prime Minister, along with Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek, has also been named in texts and audio of communications involving Mr Sharaz and Ms Higgins. Mr Albanese dodged questions over whether his Left-faction ally and close friend misled parliament.

Mr Albanese said he had “absolute confidence in Senator Gallagher” and distanced himself from being named by Mr Sharaz as complicit in the political pressure campaign against former prime minister Scott Morrison.

“I don’t take advice from, I had not met Brittany Higgins until I met her publicly, publicly on the same day that she met Scott Morrison,” Mr Albanese said.

Ms Plibersek refused to answer questions from The Australian about when and what she knew about Ms Higgins’ allegations.

The Opposition Leader said he would strongly back a referral by Senator Reynolds to the NACC, which commences on July 1.

“You have serious third party allegations, you have tape recordings, you have text messages, you have other detail … and it doesn’t accord with the public accounts of some senior members of the Albanese government – and that needs to be explained,” Mr Dutton said.

“I would expect the Prime Minister – in terms of his own comments, but also the actions of his senior people – to be upfront and honest, to forget the tricky and deceptive language and answer truthfully in relation to the allegations being levelled against the government at the moment.”

Mr Dutton said misleading parliament was a “very serious allegation” and raised concerns over the multi-million-dollar payment and Senator Gallagher’s role in “signing off on ex-gratia payments”. The ­opposition’s deputy leader in the Senate, Michaelia Cash, will lead Coalition questioning of Senator Gallagher when parliament returns on Tuesday.

Asked whether the NACC should look into the payment to Ms Higgins, Mr Albanese said it would be “entirely inappropriate” for MPs to “direct the Anti-Corruption Commission into what to do”.

The Prime Minister’s comments appeared to contradict those made last November by Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, who said the NACC should take “very seriously” any referral made by a minister.

Analysis of Hansard records show Senator Gallagher’s first mention of Ms Higgins was at a Senate estimates hearing in March 2021 – about a month after the former Liberal staffer’s allegations were made public. “Part of the public interest in this also is about making sure this never happens again to anyone – a young woman allegedly raped in this building when people were working here,” she said.

Text messages between Mr Sharaz and Ms Higgins in February 2021, four days before The Project interview aired, implied that Senator Gallagher was aware of the sexual assault allegations. Mr Sharaz messaged Ms Higgins: “Katy is going to come to me with some questions you need to prepare for … She’s really invested now ha ha.” Later Mr Sharaz wrote: “She’s an old friend. We opened a chair together! So you can trust her.”

Text messages also suggest Mr Albanese gave Mr Sharaz his personal phone number in April 2021 to organise a meeting with Ms Higgins. Ms Higgins responded: “For sure. I have no qualms meeting with Albo”. On April 22, Mr Sharaz texted Ms Higgins, “Friday 9am with Albo locked in at CPO. Details to come. A minute later Mr Sharaz texts: “Tanya too.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/katy-gallagher-accused-of-misleading-parliament-faces-referral-to-corruption-watchdog/news-story/c1774e24a3ac824ae4e20f4c0cdac4f5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977134

File: baf940631c4f0e6⋯.jpg (76.35 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 718a98f04c5f367⋯.jpg (77.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Finance_Minister_Katy_Gall….jpg)

File: 47540a996e352e4⋯.jpg (181.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_claimed_s….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Labor sought to gain — it’s found political pain over Brittany Higgins saga

SIMON BENSON - JUNE 9, 2023

The vexing domestic realities of being prime minister have landed squarely at Anthony Albanese’s feet this week after his return from overseas.

Facing a war with inflation, battles with business, the spectre of recession and flagging support for the voice to parliament, Albanese now also faces a potential political scandal involving senior members of his government.

Having had an easy ride for the first 12 months in office, Albanese is now under pressure, with the road ahead riddled with potential political potholes.

The key to the Brittany Higgins text revelations is who among Albanese’s cabinet colleagues knew what and when. There are unresolved questions about what level of involvement members of the then Labor opposition had.

Albanese has expressed full confidence in Finance Minister Katy Gallagher.

Why this is potentially damaging for the Albanese government is clear. A key part in the politics of Labor’s successful characterisation of Scott Morrison was that he was out of touch with women.

When the Higgins rape allegations surfaced, in a strict political sense, it was weaponised as part of the broader campaign against the then prime minister.

There was a deep suspicion among senior Coalition figures all the way through that period that there was active support being given to Higgins from political opponents of the government.

They were unable to substantiate any of it at the time.

The text revelations uncovered by The Australian this week have started to lift the lid on what was going on at a political level.

What is coming out now is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that there was a deep political dimension to the case that went beyond the legal and the personal tragedy of Higgins.

The political elements it appears involved senior people on the Labor side, some of whom are now ministers.

If the question is did Labor go too far in opposition, then the answer is probably yes.

And we are not yet at the end of it.

It is too early to start talking about referrals to an integrity commission that doesn’t yet exist.

This was a mistaken path for the opposition to go down yet. But it’s worth remembering that history has shown that the first people integrity commissions try to shoot are members of the government that created them.

As of this week, however, it presents another major distraction for Albanese, whose core focus after this week’s 12th rate rise in little over a year should be cost of living as the government’s first and second priorities.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labor-sought-to-gain-its-found-onlypolitical-pain/news-story/14b2790cc5545c1bba6a8df276e4976c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977148

File: 91fe598b2ce80df⋯.jpg (153.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_with_her_….jpg)

File: 7d58b3b3969df08⋯.jpg (146.94 KB,1280x720,16:9,Johannes_Leak_Cartoon.jpg)

File: 08be28765956e85⋯.jpg (89.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Finance_Minister_Katy_Gall….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

David Sharaz is a ‘puppet master’ set on destroying the Liberals: Bruce Lehrmann

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and ELLIE DUDLEY - JUNE 9, 2023

Bruce Lehrmann has claimed Brittany Higgins’ partner David Sharaz is a “puppet master” who orchestrated the release of the rape allegations against him, and says he has exploited Ms Higgins’ “fame” to engineer a campaign to support Labor and topple the ­Liberals.

Mr Lehrmann’s scathing opinion of Mr Sharaz comes as leaked text messages reveal Mr Sharaz had used his connections with a former Labor media adviser to line up a job for Ms Higgins, following her resignation from the office of former attorney-general Michaelia Cash.

The Australian revealed on Thursday Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz planned to enlist the help of senior Labor MPs to pursue Ms Higgins’ rape allegation and her claim the Coalition government covered it up. Following those revelations, Mr Lehrmann claimed to The Australian that Mr Sharaz used his girlfriend’s rape allegations to “take down the Liberal Party in some respects”. “Then I think he’s probably now riding the wave of Higgins’s fame that he got,” Mr Lehrmann said.

Mr Lehrmann pointed to evidence given by senior AFP constable Emma Frizzell in the Sofronoff inquiry, that during a rest break in Ms Higgins’ first recorded police interview in March 2021, Mr Sharaz “entered the room and without concern for Ms Higgins’ welfare, commenced showing and discussing media coverage to Ms Higgins”.

“I believe the level of media involvement did affect the conduct of the investigation of Ms Higgins’ complaint,” Constable Frizzell said on May 26. “I believe it was a tool driven by Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz, which is evident by the first engagement I had with them, whereby Ms Higgins advised she wished to see how the media played out prior to providing a statement.”

Mr Lehrmann claimed Constable Frizzell’s evidence was ­indicative of Mr Sharaz “being the puppet master, essentially”.

“He just keeps injecting himself into it,” he said. “He’s just more worried about how best to spin it or sell it or drop something in the media.”

Mr Lehrmann accused Mr Sharaz of wishing to weaponise sexual assault to advance the Labor Party, describing him as a “class A typical political staffer”.

“(Seemed) clear that he was there to sell a message and that was the weaponisation of the sexual assault,” Mr Lehrmann said. “It wasn’t about me, it was about a bigger purpose, and clearly it was for the Labor Party. People need to follow the breadcrumbs. Take a deep breath, be pragmatic, and follow the breadcrumbs.”

Leaked messages obtained by The Australian revealed on a number of occasions Mr Sharaz asked Ms Higgins: “Are you getting spotted? Are people noticing you? Anyone recognise you?”

On March 16, 2021, about a month after Ms Higgins was interviewed by Lisa Wilkinson on The Project, Mr Sharaz texted Ms Higgins: “Don’t ditch me now you’re famous.” Minutes later he told her “we exude power”.

Mr Sharaz did not respond to The Australian’s request for ­comment.

Further leaked messages revealed Mr Sharaz secured Ms Higgins a job as media adviser with the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria through his friend Emma Webster, a senior adviser to Finance Minister Katy Gallagher when she was ACT chief minister. Ms Webster previously worked as a top adviser for former prime minister Julia Gillard and Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews.

In a message to Ms Higgins on January 1, 2021, he wrote: “Emma wants me to tell you that she’s about to advertise for a media adviser. It’s 80-90k and if you need a job for a short term to fill a void.”

He described the job as helping to “progress the Treaty”, as he ­celebrated the possibility of his “two favourite women” working together.

Sky News on Thursday night revealed more audio from the five hour long pre-interview between Lisa Wilkinson, Ms Higgins, Mr Sharaz and The Project producer Angus Llewelyn, in which the group laughed at the diversity of the Liberal Party. Wilkinson struggled to pronounce Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s name, as she said: “(The Liberal Party) has preselected over 20 new and wonderfully diverse and strong female candidates like, and what’s her name Jacinta (inaudible). She’s an Indigenous woman.”

Mr Sharaz laughed and said “well she clearly got in … clearly it was a safe seat.”

Wilkinson: “That’s the thing. It was, and that was, as soon as I looked at it I thought, ‘oh, you’re joking’.”

Mr Sharaz: “It’s like, I’m not racist. I’ve got a black friend.”

Wilkinson: “And our cleaner’s black.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/david-sharaz-is-a-puppet-master-set-on-destroying-the-liberals-bruce-lehrmann/news-story/19290b9909d629d19fbb5a6a1db69bbf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977167

File: 1cbc841a9592695⋯.jpg (179.47 KB,1024x768,4:3,Brittany_Higgins_and_partn….jpg)

File: 30792d10587cc4f⋯.jpg (136.07 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Senator_Katy_Gallagher_the….jpg)

File: 3da1fcb914db7f8⋯.jpg (168.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Then_political_reporter_Da….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

>>18977148

What we know about Brittany Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz

From support act to central player, the links of David Sharaz to Canberra and key figures in the Labor Party appear deeply personal.

STAFF WRITERS - June 9, 2023

1/2

After a week of explosive revelations, the fiance of Brittany Higgins, David Sharaz has gone from support act to central figure in the saga involving her alleged rape at Parliament House.

Who is David Sharaz and where did he work?

David Sharaz is a former journalist and Canberra media adviser who has recently worked in radio for Southern Cross Austereo in Brisbane.

After Ms Higgins alleged she was raped by a colleague in then-Defence Minister Linda Reynolds’ office in 2019, text messages have revealed Mr Sharaz’s close involvement in negotiating the public airing of Ms Higgins’ story.

Mr Sharaz resigned from his job with Southern Cross Austereo in February, just two weeks after receiving a defamation notice from Senator Reynolds, Ms Higgins’ former boss, over comments he has made about the saga on social media.

Why did he meet with Lisa Wilkinson?

Mr Sharaz was present during a five-hour meeting between Ms Higgins, The Project host Lisa Wilkinson and her producer Angus Llewellyn in 2021 in which the group discussed putting Ms Higgins’s allegations to air and finding “friendly” Labor politicians to push the story and put the Morrison government under pressure.

A large tranche of previously unseen text messages, published exclusively in The Australian, show Mr Sharaz boasting of his close relationship with Labor Senator Katy Gallagher, now Finance Minister, as well as his moves to set up meetings between Ms Higgins and Anthony Albanese, Tanya Plibersek and Malcolm Turnbull as well as other “Brittany Higgins fans” in Canberra.

Mr Sharaz married a Treasury adviser in 2018 and reportedly named tables at his wedding after prominent Labor figures. The couple separated in 2020 before Mr Sharaz became involved with Ms Higgins. He proposed to her in December 2022 and the pair jetted off to the Maldives on holiday.

Bruce Lehrmann, who was tried for allegedly raping Ms Higgins but later had the charges dropped, has told The Australian Mr Sharaz is a “class A typical political staffer”.

Why is he under fire?

His links to Labor politicians including Senator Gallagher have put the spotlight on the government over exactly when it became aware of Ms Higgins’ allegations, and appear to back up claims of an orchestrated political campaign.

Mr Lehrmann has accused Mr Sharaz of weaponising sexual assault to advance the Labor Party and bring down the Liberal government.

Senator Gallagher denied any prior knowledge of the rape claims, but texts from Mr Sharaz appear to show he had contacted her about The Project interview days before it went to air.

She is now accused of misleading parliament.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977172

File: b199d05c2f37a27⋯.jpg (105.94 KB,768x1024,3:4,Mr_Sharaz_proposes_to_Ms_H….jpg)

File: 813e7c0aec43152⋯.jpg (183.3 KB,768x1023,256:341,The_couple_with_some_fan_m….jpg)

File: 51ab74631b5bf94⋯.jpg (72.85 KB,768x1024,3:4,David_William_Wonnocott_le….jpg)

>>18977167

2/2

In a sensational interview with The Australian, Senator Reynolds revealed how she learned of Ms Higgins’ allegations, spoke of discrepancies in her young staffer’s claims and insisted Senate colleagues on the Labor side were behind a political “hit job” to ruin her career and the Morrison government’s election chances. She also revealed the late Labor senator Kimberley Kitching had confided in her that Penny Wong – now Foreign Minister – knew of the rape allegations and planned to “weaponise” them.

“She was actually quite distressed that Penny’s going to weaponise the incident,” Senator Reynolds said.

What about the compensation payout?

After going public with her rape allegations, Ms Higgins received a confidential compensation payout from Senator Gallagher’s Finance Department, believed to be worth up to $3 million. The money was awarded to Ms Higgins in ­December over her claim she was not properly supported by Senator Reynolds and others after the ­alleged sexual assault by Bruce Lehrmann.

Questions have now been raised about how that decision was made and whether it should be referred for investigation. A spokesperson for Senator Gallagher told The Australian: “The Minister for Finance has no decision-making role in processes around significant legal matters.”

At the time, the Prime Minister declined to answer questions about whether it was a conflict of interest for Senator Gallagher to have oversight of the deal, given her earlier engagement on the issue and whether she should ­recuse herself from any involvement in it.

Kill threats

In April, a NSW man was charged after allegedly threatening to kill Mr Sharaz, Brittany Higgins and their pet cavoodle over social media.

David William Wonnocot, 49, allegedly told Mr Sharaz he would “kill you both when you least expect it” and that he was planning to “chop Kingston [pet dog] up into little pieces”, according to messages seen by The Australian. Mr Wonnocot also allegedly told Mr Sharaz that he would follow him and Ms Higgins home and “destroy you all”.

“During the investigation, detectives uncovered a total of 49 messages with similar threats or offensive content sent from a number of accounts, which were believed to be linked,” a police spokesperson said. “Further inquiries revealed one of the accounts was also linked to messages sent on social media to a man in the ACT, allegedly threatening to kill the man, his partner, and their pet dog.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/david-sharaz-how-brittany-higgins-fiance-played-a-central-role-in-rape-allegation-saga/news-story/95eddea9c77415a89a15169a553a7f77

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977231

File: 86f847b286dd52a⋯.mp4 (15.83 MB,640x360,16:9,Wilkinson_mangles_Jacinta_….mp4)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Lisa Wilkinson caught mocking Liberals in secret tape

Ex-Project star Lisa Wilkinson has been caught on tape mocking Liberals along with Ten colleagues and struggling to pronounce Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s name.

Samantha Maiden - June 8, 2023

1/2

Ex-Project star Lisa Wilkinson has been caught on tape struggling to pronounce Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s name and mocking Liberals with Ten colleagues.

The explosive audio was recorded by Project producer Angus Llewllyn on his mobile phone during a pre-interview discussion at a Sydney hotel on January 27, 2021.

It includes Ms Wilkinson, Brittany Higgins, her partner David Sharaz and Llewllyn, an executive producer, drinking gin and tonics and mimosas and giving their ‘unplugged’ views on political leaders.

Channel Ten was then forced to hand it over under subpoena in the lead up to the criminal trial but only a snippet of audio was played to the jury. The bulk of the recording was never tendered in evidence.

On Thursday night, Sky News’s Sharri Markson aired more from the marathon recording.

It includes Ms Wilkinson discussing claims the Liberals have preselected “diversity candidates” including Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

Ms Wilkinson then struggles to pronounce Ms Price’s name before the group discusses the Liberal Party.

“See we know brown people,’’ Mr Llewllyn said, suggesting this was the approach of the Liberal Party.

“It’s like, I’m not a racist I have a black friend. That’s the argument,’’ Mr Sharaz responds.

Ms Wilkinson then chimes in suggesting the attitude of some in the Liberal Party is, “And my cleaner is black.”

News.com.au has contacted Ms Wilkinson, Mr Llewllyn and Channel Ten for comment.

Tensions have previously flared between Senator Price and Ms Wilkinson after the Channel 10 star announced her shock departure from The Project last year.

Her complaints prompted Senator Price, who had a feud with Ms Wilkinson’s husband Peter FitzSimons after a combative interview, to unleash a brutal swipe on Facebook.

“Perhaps you and your husband might want to spend a few months out bush now that you have the time, to see what tough means to everyday Australians and some of our most marginalised people in communities that are far away from the sunny north shore?,’’ Senator Price said.

Lawyers acting for Channel Ten are now trying to determine who had access to the leaked audio material - a group which is said to include police, lawyers, the director of public prosecution’s office and potentially third parties.

The unprecedented leaking of Brittany Higgins’ private text messages and a secret recording of her talking with journalists is set to be raised at a federal court hearing on Friday as an extraordinary legal whodunit emerges over the six-hour audiotape.

According to the Daily Mail, which has originally obtained the audio, Ms Higgins drank a mimosa and Mr Sharaz a gin and tonic as they discussed the forthcoming episode.

But now questions have emerged over the leak of the audio that has Australia’s media and legal industry talking.

Separately, thousands of text messages on Brittany Higgins iPhone have been leaked to media outlets and Ms Higgins believes that some of the material is from her iCloud records that were handed over to police.

Bruce Lehrmann was accused of raping Ms Higgins before his trial collapsed and charges were dropped.

He is now pursuing a defamation action against two media outlets.

The legal firm acting for Mr Lehrmann in his defamation action – Mark O’Brien Legal – insist they never had access to the material that was leaked to the media.

“We have not had access to the phone and audiotape you refer to,’’ solicitor Paul Svilans told news.com.au.

“In fact, we are at present actually seeking access to the audiotape for the purpose of the defamation proceedings for the reason that we don’t have it.”

Criminal barrister Steve Whybrow said it was “kept secure”.

Barrister Steve Whybrow SC, who represented Mr Lehrmann at the criminal trial did have access but said it was kept secure at all times.

In fact, he refused to hand it over to Mark O’Brien Legal in the defamation action where he is instructed to appear as senior counsel.

“I can categorically assure you that I, my co counsel and my Chambers have absolutely kept any material received in R v Lehrmann secure,’’ Mr Whybrow told news.com.au.

“I have not (and have taken the view that I could not) even provide my solicitors in the defamation actions any material that was not already deployed in the criminal trial.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977238

File: c62cf35053d5bcc⋯.jpg (109.47 KB,1024x768,4:3,Brittany_Higgins_partner_D….jpg)

File: 79948733390ced0⋯.jpg (58.95 KB,1024x768,4:3,Lisa_Wilkinson_was_recorde….jpg)

File: 106febee28a1d85⋯.jpg (109.9 KB,1024x768,4:3,Ms_Wilkinson_struggled_to_….jpg)

File: b8cba6bf740bfe4⋯.jpg (88.47 KB,1024x768,4:3,Brittany_Higgins_with_her_….jpg)

File: 351121e3d99b81e⋯.jpg (93.44 KB,1024x768,4:3,Bruce_Lehrmann_was_accused….jpg)

>>18977231

2/2

DPP expects all parties to comply with ‘lawful obligations’

The Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold remains on leave after he gave evidence to the Board of Inquiry investigating the investigation and trial of Mr Lehrmann.

The acting DPP Anthony Williamson SC said the DPP does not ‘control’ or ‘manage’ disclosed information but expects all parties to comply with their lawful obligations.

“While the Board of Inquiry has conducted public hearings, I understand its investigative process has, for the most part, been conducted in secret,’’ Mr Williamson told news.com.au.

“I understand that coercive powers under the Inquiries Act 1991 (ACT) have been exercised, examinations have been conducted in secret, and non-publication/suppression orders have been made in relation to various aspects of the proceeding and given to various witnesses.

“The BOI is a statutorily independent process and therefore is not subject to the control or direction of the DPP, nor (unsurprisingly) has the BOI consulted with the DPP about its processes and investigation. I am not in a position to comment on what material the BOI may, or may not, have had access to.

“Similarly, I am not in a position to provide a running commentary on who had access to what material.

“As you would appreciate, the DPP provides disclosure in accordance with its lawful obligations. The DPP does not ‘control’ or ‘manage’ disclosed material once provided to the defence. We expect all parties to comply with their lawful obligations in relation to disclosed material.”

The Board of Inquiry led by Walter Sofronoff SC was contacted by news.com.au for comment and did not respond before publication.

The Australian Federal Police were contacted before the publication of this story and said they had “no comment” on the leak of the complainants private text messages provided during the criminal investigation.

News.com.au does not suggest either party was involved in the leak only that it was originally in the possession of the police, the DPP and lawyers and was ultimately provided to the media, by persons unknown.

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/lisa-wilkinson-caught-mocking-liberals-in-secret-tape/news-story/7b6d4861e371a6e95f2038b54266345b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977278

File: 80105c9e0945150⋯.jpg (178 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_and_Jacinta….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

>>18977231

Wilkinson, Network 10 apologise to Jacinta Nampijinpa Price over leaked recording

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - JUNE 9, 2023

Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 have apologised to Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price after leaked audio revealed Wilkinson struggling to pronounce the senator’s name in a manner she claimed was racist.

But Ms Wilkinson also defended the “tenor” of the conversation, which Senator Price claimed was “derogatory”, as about how many female Liberal pre-selections “were in unwinnable positions”.

“I sincerely apologise to Senator Price for any offence I may have caused. The conversation was private and not intended to appear as it has out of context and in the public arena,” she said in a statement released by Network 10.

The controversial comments were leaked from a recording of a pre-interview with Wilkinson, Brittany Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz in the days before Network 10’s The Project revealed Ms Higgins’ allegations of rape by a Liberal staffer.

Ms Wilkinson said: “(The Liberal Party) preselected over 20 new and wonderfully diverse and strong female candidates like, what’s her name, Nam … Nampinjumba? (sic). She’s an Indigenous woman.”

In response, Mr Sharaz laughed and said: “She clearly got in. Clearly it was a safe seat.”

‘That’s the thing, it was – as soon as I looked at it I thought, ‘Oh, you’re joking’,” Wilkinson said.

Mr Sharaz added: “They’ve been preselected in unwinnable seats.”

Wilkinson’s producer Angus Llewellyn joined in with a joke about the Coalition preselecting Ms Price, saying: “See, we know brown people.”

Mr Sharaz followed, “It’s like, ‘I’m not racist, I have a black friend’. It’s that argument.”

“I don’t have his number, though,” Mr Llewellyn said.

Wilkinson closed the chat, saying: “And our cleaner’s black.”

On Friday, Senator Price called the comments “racist” and said an apology would be “the decent thing to do”.

“Obviously they’re rather derogatory and racist comments.

“Channel 10, The Project has never been interested in the view of a conservative Indigenous woman from outback Australia. They have not once demonstrated their interest in the concerns I’ve certainly raised.

“That level of arrogance and ignorance doesn’t surprise me.”

Senator Price said what had offended her the most was Wilkinson’s suggestion she a “diversity pick”.

“We’ve got a pretty bloody good track record on preselecting individuals on merit who happen to be Indigenous people.

“I would be interested to know who their black friends are,” referring to Ms Wilkinson and her husband Peter FitzSimons.

“I would absolutely expect an apology from the 10 Network, from Lisa Wilkinson herself, that would be the decent thing to do.

“Unfortunately, this new woke culture that we’re confronted with allows racism to exist in plain sight.”

It is understood that Channel 10 via Paramount Executive Vice President Beverley McGarvey personally called Senator Price to apologise and that she accepted the apology.

A spokesperson for Network 10 said they “regret any distress caused by the unauthorised publication of these intended private conversations”.

Network 10 was also critical that the subpoenaed recordings had been leaked.

“Network 10 was subpoenaed to provide confidential documents and audio recordings to the DPP and Bruce Lehrmann’s legal team during the criminal case brought against Mr. Lehrmann. With the criminal proceedings now concluded, there is no justifiable reason for this material to be made public,” the spokesperson said.

“However, a currently unidentified source has leaked the recordings of a more than five-hour private conversation to sections of the media which have used comments from the individuals involved selectively and out of context, providing a distorted version of events without seeking clarification from the participants to the conversation.”

Ms Wilkinson defended the conversation.

“The tenor of our conversation was about the need for real, genuine change within the Liberal party, and that too many of their female pre-selections were in unwinnable positions,” she said in the statement.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jacinta-nampijinpa-price-demands-apology-from-lisa-wilkinson/news-story/12e895f0921f65123fee569f2b5f38c8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977458

File: cd7340124ea0f9b⋯.jpg (192.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,Central_Land_Council_membe….jpg)

File: 3753090bab38d06⋯.jpg (132.32 KB,1233x770,1233:770,Linda_Burney_was_handed_a_….jpg)

File: e8e9f80099d5618⋯.jpg (493.61 KB,1150x805,10:7,More_than_200_elected_memb….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18971069

NT land councils back the Voice to Parliament at Barunga Festival, 'to finally be respected as equals'

The delegates heard powerful arguments in favour of the Voice to Parliament, which will go to a referendum later this year.

Bronte Charles - 9 June 2023

Members of Northern Territory Aboriginal Land Councils have gathered at Barunga, to declare their support of an Indigenous Voice in the upcoming referendum.

More than 200 representatives of the Northern, Central, Tiwi and Anindilyakwa Aboriginal Land Councils gathered on the Traditional Lands of the Bagala (Jawoyn).

Land council members signed the Declaration and a copy was then presented to Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney.

The 2023 Barunga Voice Declaration calls "for the recognition of our peoples in our still young constitution by enshrining our Voice to the parliament and executive government, never to be rendered silent with the stroke of a pen again".

Northern Land Council chair, Samuel Bush-Blanasi said that he believes voting yes will help his clan, community and family finally be respected as equals.

“I am very proud the NLC is hosting this historic meeting at Barunga. We are standing strong together as we continue our long struggle."

"We [are] asking all Australians to support us and vote ‘Yes’ so we can finally be respected as equals,” Mr Bush-Blansai said.

Matthew Palmer, chair of the Central Land Council said that he doesn't want Australians to be confused by the "nay-sayers" in Canberra.

"We must right the wrongs of the past and deal with the serious issues impacting First Nations peoples, empower First Nations peoples and unite our country."

Thomas Amagula, the Anindilyakwa deputy chair, made reference to the famous statement of 1988 in his call to action.

“The call for constitutional recognition and a Voice to Parliament is about respect and coming together as a country to build a future we can all be proud of."

"This is what those old leaders started back in 1988 and we stand here today to carry on the spirit of their legacy."

Tiwi Land Council chair, Gibson Farmer Illortaminni spoke on behalf of the Tiwi people.

"Through the proposed referendum and the establishment of a Voice to Parliament, we, the Tiwi people, want to be at the table when decisions are made that affect our land, culture, and future," he said.

Minister of Indigenous Australians Linda Burney also addressed the gathering.

"This is your voice. It is not the voice of Canberra. It is the voice of the bush, of the regions and of people living in urban areas."

"The people here in the territory we just heard from felt very disempowered. The legacy of the intervention still looms large here. Let us think what a Voice can do for us into the future.

"I want you to know that I want to work in partnership with you. It's not about me making decisions for you.

"I know how much these words mean to you and to your communities, how much you wish to be heard, how much you wish to see your fellow Australians stand up with you and vote yes in the upcoming referendum.

"It is for the sake of a better future. It is for our children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren. A better future for all of us."

https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/nt-aboriginal-land-councils-gather-at-barunga-to-declare-their-support-for-the-uluru-statement-of-the-heart/lygq1zsng

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977583

File: 6ebce5a0c204d18⋯.jpg (160.58 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Victorian_Bar_Associat….jpg)

File: 67e76563960c2b8⋯.jpg (66.66 KB,768x1023,256:341,Victorian_Bar_president_Sa….jpg)

File: d86b76adbc7fe44⋯.jpg (69.99 KB,768x1023,256:341,Lana_Collaris.jpg)

>>18928670

>>18794875 (pb)

Victorian Bar lawyers back the voice following membership poll

ELLIE DUDLEY - JUNE 9, 2023

The Victorian Bar Association has thrown its support behind the Indigenous voice, claiming it is “sound” and “appropriate”, after a membership poll revealed just over 50 per cent of barristers supported the Bar taking a public stance.

The state Bar Council elected to poll the entire association last month following a fractious debate broke out among members over whether it should issue a statement supporting the Indigenous voice, or whether it should stay silent.

Results from the poll showed that of the 2229 Bar members who were eligible to vote, 1767 did.

Of those 1767 members, 1008 (57 per cent) voted in favour of the Bar supporting the Indigenous voice and 714 (40 per cent) voted for a separate motion that the Bar not publicly support either the “yes” case of the “no” case for the voice.

Forty-five members abstained from voting.

As a result, Victorian Bar President Sam Hay said the association would therefore support the Indigenous voice, and believed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s referendum proposal to be “sound, appropriate and compatible with Australia’s system of representative and responsible government”.

“Following a poll of Victorian Bar members about the Bar’s position (if any) on the proposed Voice to parliament, it has been determined that: The Victorian Bar supports constitutional recognition of Australia’s First People. The Victorian Bar considers that the amendment proposed by the Bill for an Act to alter the Constitution is sound, appropriate, and compatible with Australia’s system of representative and responsible government which would be enhanced by the addition of the Voice,” he wrote in an email to members on Friday.

He thanked “members who participated in what was a very important debate”.

The poll asked members to respond to the following question:

Do you:

i) support a motion that The Victorian Bar Incorporated does not publicly support either the “yes” case or the “no” case in any referendum to alter the Australian Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice;

ii) support a motion that The Victorian Bar Incorporated supports Constitutional recognition of Australia’s First People. The Victorian Bar Incorporated considers that the amendment proposed by the Bill for an Act to alter the Constitution is sound, appropriate, and compatible with Australia’s system of representative and responsible Government which would be enhanced by the addition of the Voice; or

iii) choose to abstain from submitting a vote in respect of the above motions.

Barrister Lana Collaris, who organised the motion for the Bar to abstain from making public comment on the voice, said the vote demonstrated it was inappropriate for large organisations to comment on political issues on behalf of its members.

“I am very proud that we stood up to certain Bar councillors who sought to impose their own personal political views upon the rest of the membership without qualification,” she said.

“While the Bar has now issued an official statement in support of the voice, the poll results show that only 45 per cent of eligible members actually support that statement.

“What that demonstrates is that the Bar, like any other non-political organisation, cannot make unqualified political statements on behalf of all members.

“To do so not only misrepresents to the public that those members have a unified and collective view; it operates as a form of suppression of speech upon those who think differently.”

The Australian has contacted Peter Hanks KC, who put forward the Yes motion, for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victorian-bar-lawyers-back-the-voice-following-membership-poll/news-story/e09eb754d84d2593e17da5714ef66d39

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977671

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18934029

Ben Roberts-Smith alleged to have directed the killing of elderly imam in Afghanistan

Mark Willacy, Josh Robertson and Rory Callinan - 8 Jun 2023

1/2

Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith directed one of his SAS comrades to kill an elderly man who was dragged from a mosque in Afghanistan, according to allegations uncovered by ABC Investigations.

ABC Investigations can reveal the disgraced war hero's alleged involvement in the killing, which sparked a diplomatic row for Australia.

The Australian government was quick to defend the August 2012 killing of Haji Raz Mohammad, an imam in the village of Sola, in Uruzgan province, claiming he was an insurgent.

ABC Investigations understands the alleged incident is now in the hands of Australia's war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI).

The OSI is investigating allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan by Australian soldiers.

It said it did not "comment on individuals, allegations or whether they are the subject of investigation".

A classified document seen by the ABC states Mr Roberts-Smith, who at the time was an SAS patrol commander, was "directly involved" in the killing.

An internal military investigation found the shooting was justified because the imam was allegedly seen talking on a radio.

It recommended that "those soldiers directly involved … [including] CPL Roberts-Smith … be monitored for psychological injury".

But Defence sources have told ABC Investigations of allegations that Mr Roberts-Smith told a subordinate to shoot the elderly imam, and it is alleged the imam was unarmed and under control at the time.

It's then alleged a radio was planted on the dead man by another soldier to conceal that he was not involved in hostilities.

Australia's war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator, said it did not "comment on individuals, allegations or whether they are the subject of investigation".

The incident is separate to those detailed in Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation case against The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times and three journalists, which was last week dismissed by Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko.

Justice Besanko found in the defamation case that on the balance of probabilities, he murdered - or ordered the murder of - four unarmed Afghan civilians between April 2009 and September 2012.

His lawyers are considering an appeal.

Mr Roberts-Smith's lawyer Mark O'Brien on Wednesday denied the allegations, saying "at no stage has our client ever been engaged in a breach of the rules of engagement".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977685

File: ae34b41ef7fe8b3⋯.jpg (550.7 KB,2369x1579,2369:1579,Ben_Roberts_Smith_was_an_S….jpg)

File: c58ee7f1b9df77b⋯.jpg (292.55 KB,1920x1080,16:9,The_village_of_Sola_in_Afg….jpg)

File: b43172881722150⋯.jpg (186.99 KB,1128x760,141:95,Rafiullah_was_eight_years_….jpg)

File: 1bc1388028616c1⋯.jpg (99.94 KB,1920x1281,640:427,Shaharzad_Akbar_the_former….jpg)

File: 00cd3bbf4bba1f9⋯.jpg (575.06 KB,1505x809,1505:809,Defence_support_services_W….jpg)

>>18977671

2/2

Soldiers entered mosque during evening prayers, villagers say

In 2020, the ABC interviewed Sola villagers who were present during the raid, including the imam's son Rafiullah.

Rafiullah, who was eight years old at the time, said soldiers entered the mosque during evening prayers and accosted his father.

"When my father finished his prayer, they kicked him in the head while he was trying to stand up," he said.

"His turban fell down, and they stood him up. They tied up the hands of the other people in the mosque.

"They beat me up very badly, and told me, 'Go home, why are you standing here?'"

Another resident of Sola, Juma Jan, said the villagers did not notice the killing of the imam or his adult son, Abdul Jalil, in the chaos of the SAS raid.

"All were blindfolded," he said.

"Haji Raz Mohammad was killed next to people and yet no-one noticed how he was killed. They were firing shots and kicking doors, so people didn't know whether it was a shot, or the door being kicked."

Juma Jan said villagers found the imam's body the next day near some fig trees and took it to the provincial governor's residence in protest.

Within hours, then-Afghan president Hamid Karzai condemned the raid and ordered an "all-out probe into the incident".

Then-Australian Defence minister Stephen Smith said at the time the killings were justified.

"Any loss of life is of course regrettable, but I'm advised by the chief of the Defence Force that the two people who were killed have been confirmed as insurgents, both by Australian sources and by Afghan sources," he said.

Then-chief of Defence, David Hurley, said Australian special forces had "applied all our normal rules of engagement".

Mr Smith and Mr Hurley declined to comment when contacted by the ABC.

Shaharzad Akbar, the former chair of the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission which investigated the two killings in 2012, said it concluded "this father and son were both civilians, they were not insurgents".

She said the commission met with Australian military officials in October 2012 to formally raise concerns about the case but received "no response".

"It was incidents like this [at Sola] that at the time didn't even receive a response, an apology, any [proper] investigation … that really created that gap between people and the forces that were there to apparently serve them and protect them," Ms Akbar said.

"Proper investigations and prosecution and accountability in courts in Australia for allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan is of immense importance to people in Afghanistan," she said.

"I think addressing this issue in Australia will send a message that at least someone, one country who was involved in Afghanistan really cared enough to see this through, to ensure justice for victims."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-08/roberts-smith-allegedly-directed-soldier-to-kill-imam/102447030

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBkr3JntDvo

https://www.defence.gov.au/adf-members-families/health-well-being

https://www.openarms.gov.au/

https://soldieron.org.au/

https://www.defenceveteranslegalservice.org.au/Home

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977745

File: 6bdf66bb4c50fd4⋯.jpg (378.74 KB,3000x2083,3000:2083,Julian_Assange_lived_in_th….jpg)

File: b01806fc0bb9b3e⋯.jpg (39.83 KB,728x472,91:59,Julian_Assange_has_faced_a….jpg)

File: e7576f83f335705⋯.jpg (53.39 KB,615x813,205:271,Julian_Assange_s_wife_Stel….jpg)

File: 93931a017286aea⋯.jpg (301.39 KB,825x540,55:36,SAFAN_1.jpg)

>>18934224

Julian Assange will fight UK High Court decision in last legal option against extradition to the US

ABC/AP - 9 June 2023

Australian Julian Assange will fight to overturn a United Kingdom High Court ruling that rejected his appeal against extradition to the United States.

The 51-year-old WikiLeaks founder is wanted in the US for espionage, where he faces 18 charges related to publishing of tens of thousands of military and diplomatic documents.

Mr Assange last year lodged an appeal in the United Kingdom's High Court after the UK government signed an order authorising his extradition to the US.

The court rejected his appeal in a three-page written decision from Justice Jonathan Swift issued this week.

The latest High Court decision means the WikiLeaks founder is "dangerously close" to being extradited to the US, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF).

In a statement on social media, Mr Assange's wife Stella said her husband will contest the ruling – which will be his last legal option in the UK in his long-running legal saga.

"We remain optimistic that we will prevail and that Julian will not be extradited to the United States where he faces charges that could result in him spending the rest of his life in a maximum security prison for publishing true information that revealed war crimes committed by the US government," she wrote.

Mr Assange has been held in Belmarsh prison for more than four years.

He was dragged from the Ecuadorian embassy in London in 2019, where he had sought asylum for seven years.

RSF said Mr Assange, if extradited to the US, would be the first publisher prosecuted under the Espionage Act, and he faces up to 175 years in prison.

RSF director of campaigns Rebecca Vincent said the decision could "impact the climate for journalism around the world".

"The historical weight of what happens next cannot be overstated; it is time to put a stop to this relentless targeting of Assange and act instead to protect journalism and press freedom," she said.

"Our call on President [Joe] Biden is now more urgent than ever: drop these charges, close the case against Assange, and allow for his release without further delay."

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last month expressed frustration that a diplomatic solution for Mr Assange's case had not been reached, reiterating that "enough is enough".

"I've made it very clear to the US administration and also to the UK administration of the Australian government's view," Mr Albanese said in Parliament late last month, after declining an invitation to meet with Mr Assange's wife.

"Nothing is served from the ongoing incarceration of Julian Assange. What I have done … is to act in the most effective way possible.

"What I have done is act diplomatically in order to maximise the opportunity that is there of breaking through an issue which has gone on for far too long."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-09/julian-assange-last-legal-option-appeal-high-court-extradition/102459642

https://twitter.com/Stella_Assange/status/1666801960278802434

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977760

File: 770a8989ea88dde⋯.jpg (94.46 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chief_health_officer_Brett….jpg)

File: 8375c0f728cb6d3⋯.jpg (102.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Sutton_joined_the_Healt….jpg)

Victoria health chief Brett Sutton resigns after leading state Covid response

NATHAN SCHMIDT - JUNE 9, 2023

The man behind Victoria’s controversial Covid response which saw much of the state shuttered for months has resigned.

Chief health officer Brett Sutton announced he would be stepping down as the state’s health czar after more than three years in the top role.

Mr Sutton joined the Health Department in 2011, before leading the state’s response to the Covid pandemic from late-2019.

Victoria was subjected to some of the largest Covid waves throughout the pandemic, with six lockdown measures being implemented.

While widely seen as being instrumental in curbing Covid cases, tight lockdown laws drew criticism throughout Mr Sutton’s tenure.

Victorian Premier Dan Andrews defended the state’s response late-last year, stating the pandemic presented “difficult decisions” for leaders.

“These decisions were not made lightly, and they were the subject of debate and discussion and very careful consideration,” Mr Andrews said.

Mr Andrews’ comments followed the release last year of 97-page independent review led by former top public servant Peter Shergold.

The report urged governments at all levels – state and federal - to learn from the past three years.

In a statement, Victoria’s Health Department said Mr Sutton would be leaving government for a role with the country’s chief science body.

“Professor Sutton is an invaluable leader in the field of public health and will be continuing this great work in his new role at CSIRO, Australia’s national science agency, as Director of Health and Biosecurity,” a spokesperson said.

“He has helped to develop a strong and responsive public health team, providing critical health information and advice on a wide variety of issues and emergencies over the years.

“This experience will no doubt be instrumental in Professor Sutton’s new role at CSIRO where he will remain engaged in health and wellbeing at a national and regional level.”

Despite pushback against Covid measures, Mr Sutton’s omnipresence on TV and online during the pandemic earned him a loyal fanbase.

More than 4500 people are currently part of the Brett Sutton Fan Club on Facebook, with posts as recently as April celebrating his birthday.

At the end of 2020 - the first year of lockdowns - Dust Bunny Productions unveiled their 2021 Brett Sutton calendar.

The calendar featured 15 full colour photos that appeared to be from Prof Sutton’s daily Covid briefings.

Mr Sutton was regularly described as an “unlikely sex symbol” with some fans labelling him a “spunk rat”.

The shock resignation also comes after a number of high-profile departures from state health leadership.

NSW Health secretary Elizabeth Koff - who led that state’s response - resigned in early 2022.

Earlier this year, WA Premier Mark McGowan also left the top job after implementing some of the country’s harshest Covid measures.

Health officials were still finalising the details of Mr Sutton’s transition, including any acting arrangements.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victoria-health-chief-brett-sutton-resigns-after-leading-state-covid-response/news-story/b8bda8f0b0f20aa92323700a9d3df9c2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18977940

File: 68aeea257f7c97e⋯.jpg (701.37 KB,825x1449,275:483,ASPhD_1.jpg)

File: bab942bfe41333e⋯.jpg (287.73 KB,2692x3777,2692:3777,Fx38_b2WwAEcd65.jpg)

File: 083dc7bb89c2fe5⋯.jpg (127.03 KB,852x348,71:29,Q_416.jpg)

File: d80062672ba1b9f⋯.jpg (188.62 KB,852x597,284:199,Q_4349.jpg)

File: f35c51b9bbda167⋯.jpg (73.86 KB,1420x657,1420:657,SorosDestroyingAmerica.jpg)

>>18934236

Alexander Soros, PhD Tweet

Was great to see my good friend and now Australian ambassador to the US @MrKRudd when I was in DC, one of the smartest statesmen there is.

https://twitter.com/AlexanderSoros/status/1665765590177284103

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Soros

https://qalerts.pub/?q=soros

https://qalerts.pub/?q=[GS]

Q Post #416

Dec 21 2017 20:31:58 (EST)

Soros takes orders from P.

You have no idea how sick and evil these people are.

Fight, fight, fight.

Day of days.

Game over.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#416

Q Post #4349

May 29 2020 13:04:11 (EST)

Nobody escapes this.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4349

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18982556

File: ca4e90810b7572f⋯.mp4 (15.92 MB,640x360,16:9,Katy_Gallagher_s_mentions_….mp4)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Brittany Higgins: Gallagher, Wong ‘knew of rape claim’

SARAH ISON and RHIANNON DOWN - JUNE 9, 2023

Former defence minister Linda Reynolds claims now-Finance Minister Katy Gallagher and now-Foreign Minister Penny Wong conceded to her that they knew about Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations before they were made public, hours after Senator Gallagher told the Senate she had no prior knowledge of the ex-staffer’s story.

The Coalition will use parliament next week to ramp up pressure on Senator Gallagher over her knowledge of the rape allegation, as Anthony Albanese emphatically denies his minister misled the Senate.

Senator Gallagher came under intense scrutiny this week over when she was made aware of Ms Higgins’ allegation that she was raped in parliament in 2019, after text messages between Ms Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz suggested the senator was informed about the claim before it was made public.

The revelations called into question the evidence given by Senator Gallagher at a Senate ­estimates hearing in June 2021 – four months after Ms Higgins came forward with her allegation – that “no one had any knowledge” of the incident before the claim was publicly aired.

Senator Reynolds said on Friday Senator Gallagher conceded she knew both Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz in a meeting – also attended by Labor Senate leader Penny Wong and Liberal frontbencher Anne Ruston – held in the dinner break of that same hearing. “Penny did know about it ­before it went public – she said so at the meeting,” Senator Reynolds said.

The WA Liberal senator also claimed Senator Gallagher said Mr Sharaz had told her about the allegations going public “before it was going to happen”.

“After that incident I met outside with Senator Wong, Senator Gallagher and Senator Ruston,” Senator Reynolds told The Weekend Australian. “I explained what (late Labor senator) Kimberley Kitching had told me. Katy did confirm with me she knew both David and Brittany, and he had told what was going to happen before it happened.”

Senator Reynolds, who took notes of the meeting and will ­include them in a referral to the National Anti-Corruption Commission, said there was “quite a discussion as to where to next”.

“I accepted Penny Wong’s assurance she and Katy had no involvement in it (the claims) becoming public,” she said. “I repeated that in the Senate, but not making it public and not knowing are two very different things.”

A spokeswoman for Senator Wong said Senator Reynolds’ comments were disappointing. “Serious allegations were made by a Liberal staffer about a sexual ­assault in Linda Reynolds’ office,” she said. “Several Morrison government ministers were aware of the allegations and they still haven’t accounted for their ­actions.

“This matter was made public by a young woman who had the courage to come forward and tell her own story, on her own terms. It is disappointing Senator Reynolds fails to respect her decision.”

The Weekend Australian sought comment from Senator Gallager.

The Weekend Australian understands the Coalition is gearing up to make the issue the focus of question time when parliament returns next week, with some members calling for further ­action to be taken. Options open to the Coalition include demanding the attendance of the senator in the par­liament in order to give an explanation, or moving a censure motion against her. The opposition may also push for the matter to be referred to a Senate inquiry, although this would require crossbench support.

Independent Andrew Wilkie said he was “troubled” that Senator Gallagher might have misled parliament. “That’s the allegation that’s out there, and it’s a very serious allegation. Now I would hope, with parliament sitting in the next couple of weeks, that that can be explored in the parliament, and we can find the truth of the matter,” he told the ABC.

Liberal senator Gerard Rennick said he would lobby the Coalition team to back an inquiry into whether Senator Gallagher – who is also the Minister for Women – misled parliament.

Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley said the texts had brought into question the conduct of some Labor ministers as to “whether they chose to weaponise a rape allegation for political purposes”. “If it is the case that any ­politician was tipped off about this serious allegation, and then sought to obtain political ­advantage from it, I cannot see how they could remain a minister, let alone the Minister for Women,” Ms Ley said.

Mr Albanese rejected the claim Senator Gallagher misled parliament.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/brittany-higgins-gallagher-wong-knew-of-rape-claim/news-story/206a0e0e8b2dd849a1e7275e2c09a6c9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18982587

File: 173eec90fd48796⋯.mp4 (6.73 MB,640x360,16:9,Gallagher_breaks_silence_o….mp4)

File: 2e8c81c49559b3e⋯.jpg (214.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Finance_Minister_Katy_Gall….jpg)

File: c40b87112fa9052⋯.jpg (252.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senate_committee_proceedin….jpg)

File: baf1b742d23a4e6⋯.jpg (183.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Foreign_Affairs_Minister_P….jpg)

File: f206d918a57e49a⋯.jpg (235.95 KB,1988x1491,4:3,Penny_Wong_also_called_on_….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

>>18982556

Katy Gallagher admits she knew of Brittany Higgins’ rape claim, insists she didn’t ‘weaponise’ information

PAUL GARVEY - JUNE 10, 2023

Under-fire Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has conceded she became aware of some details of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations before they were made public, but insists she did not do anything with the information.

Speaking briefly to media in Fremantle on Saturday morning, Ms Gallagher was asked whether she would step down over the recent revelations about her early involvement.

“Why would I?,” she said.

Senator Gallagher denied misleading the Senate in an exchange in 2021 when former defence minister Linda Reynolds claimed senior Labor figures had been tipped off about the allegations before they were aired in the media.

“No one had any knowledge. How dare you! It’s all about protecting yourself,” Senator Gallagher said at the time.

Facing the media for the first time since text messages surfaced showing Ms Higgins’ boyfriend, David Sharaz, claiming to have corresponded with the senator in the days leading up to the story breaking, Senator Gallagher said she had not misled the parliament.

“I was responding to an assertion that was being made by the minister Reynolds at the time that we had known about this for weeks and had made a decision to weaponise it,” she said.

“That is not true. It was never true. I explained that to Senator Reynolds that night and she accepted that explanation.”

She said she had received only limited details from Mr Sharaz and did not take any action as a result of her interactions with him.

“Mr Sharaz provided me with information, I think we’ve seen that in the paper in the last couple of days,” she said.

“I did nothing with that information. And I was clear about that at the time.

She said Senator Reynolds had accepted her explanation at the time.

“There’s absolutely no issue here at all,” she said.

“I’ve been clear, I’ve been honest. And at all times, I’ve been guided by the bravery and courage of a young woman who chose to speak up about her workplace. And from that we have had massive changes to that workplace because of the problem.”

Ms Gallagher and foreign minister Penny Wong – who has also faced questions over what she knew about the allegations – were the two keynote speakers at a Labor Women’s Conference in Fremantle on Saturday.

Both women received rousing standing ovations from the party faithful.

Ms Gallagher told the conference there was nowhere she would rather be than in a room full of Labor women.

Speaking to reporters earlier in the day, Ms Wong also said she only knew “some details” of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations before they were made public.

Ms Wong said she was among a number of senators who were aware of some details as early as 2020.

“I want to make clear, I did not know the full details of the allegations before the story became public,” she said.

“There are others who did know a lot of detail, including Morrison government ministers, and they have still failed to account for what they did with that information.”

Ms Wong said she was among a group of senators who had first become aware of elements of the story three years ago.

“President (Scott) Ryan, the former president of the senate, made a statement to the Senate some time ago, in which he indicated that a number of senators, including me, were aware of some details as early as 2020, when an anonymous complaint or anonymous complaints were made to presiding officers and senate committees. Those details have never been made public, including by me,” she said.

She said there were still questions about what the former government knew about the allegations at the time.

“Serious allegations were made by a Liberal staffer about an alleged rape which occurred metres from prime minister Morrison’s office,” Ms Wong said.

“I would make the point that to this day, the Australian people do not know what Mr Morrison’s office knew, and when they knew, because the report he commissioned by his former chief of staff, Mr (Phil) Gaetjens has never been made public.”

The foreign minister also called on media organisations to consider the impact on Ms Higgins from the current commentary.

“I’d ask people to recall that when the (Department of Public Prosecutions) discontinued the prosecution, they discussed and I quote, that the trial represented a significant and unacceptable risk to her life,” she said.

“In that context, I would urge everybody commenting on this to reflect upon doing so responsibly, and for those who have published her private text messages without her consent, I would ask them to reflect on their responsibilities.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/penny-wong-says-she-only-knew-some-details-of-brittany-higgins-rape-claim-before-it-became-public/news-story/1ffd178229c3d2e58e36438b2e4a131f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18982744

File: 6875bf9deab4958⋯.jpg (78.19 KB,634x636,317:318,Grace_Tame_posted_the_trib….jpg)

File: 501f0d2d890eb3d⋯.jpg (70.74 KB,634x636,317:318,The_deleted_post_went_up_o….jpg)

File: b5b18feec9f0934⋯.jpg (166.93 KB,634x783,634:783,Brittany_Higgins_and_Grace….jpg)

File: e5c2c931a3b5644⋯.jpg (20.46 KB,634x796,317:398,Clocking_on_a_link_to_the_….jpg)

File: 545de8205bc4a66⋯.jpg (61.72 KB,634x281,634:281,Grace_Tame_s_powerful_post….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

EXCLUSIVE: Mystery as Grace Tame quietly removes gushing Brittany Higgins birthday tribute where she declared her 'a national hero' on Instagram

CANDACE SUTTON - 9 June 2023

Grace Tame has deleted an Instagram post in which she declared Brittany Higgins was 'a national hero' and that the former political staffer was a 'warrior' and 'my friend'.

The sexual abuse survivor made national headlines when she wrote the post on Brittany Higgins' birthday last year, but it has now mysteriously disappeared from her social media page.

The rousing post, which was an emotional tribute to the former Liberal staffer, decried what Ms Tame called an 'insidious nationwide character assassination campaign' against Ms Higgins, saying her 'friend' had faced 'layered injustice' and 'relentless criticism'.

Posted with a striking photograph of the two women taken during a magazine cover shoot, the 2021 Australian of the Year wrote 'Happy birthday, dear Brittany. Warrior. Human. My friend.

'Brittany Higgins has taken every step of her excruciating journey under a microscope; with a nation breathing down her neck. This is no mean feat.

'I have been awed and floored by her intelligence, kindness, vulnerability and determination to keep fighting for herself and others in the face of prolonged, layered injustice and heightened relentless criticism,' Ms Tame wrote.

Ms Tame's December 7, 2022 post, which has now vanished from all stories about it linked to her Instagram page, was supporting Ms Higgins as she spent her 28th birthday in a Queensland mental health clinic.

Ms Higgins went into the clinic the week after prosecutors announced they were abandoning a second trial against her former colleague Bruce Lehrmann, who she alleged raped her in 2019.

Last Sunday, Mr Lehrmann appeared on television to speak publicly for the first time outside a court room, and repeat his denial of Ms Higgins' claims and give his account of what occurred at Parliament House on the night in question.

Controversy has since erupted over the actions of politicians, Ms Higgins' partner David Sharaz, Channel 10 TV star Lisa Wilkinson and others involved in the Higgins saga.

Daily Mail Australia has asked Ms Tame why the post was removed and whether it was linked to the current controversy.

In the now deleted post, Ms Tame wrote: 'I am not a judge or jury, but I am a person who has also walked repeatedly in the line of fire – often alone – and it is not for the faint-hearted.

'However, it is not for this reason that I stand with Brittany. It is simply because she is a decent human being. I stand with Brittany because I have compassion for her.

'High-speed devices are simultaneously diminishing our collective attention spans, desensitising us to delicate content, and distorting our boundaries.

'The aftermath of shock in online spaces often feels like a virtual stampede that leaves its subjects alone in the dust. I have seen this happen to Britt repeatedly.

'Anyone who argues that words can't cause serious damage has never been the target of an insidious nationwide character assassination campaign like Brittany has.'

Ms Tame said at the time that over a period of 18 months with both women at the centre of a national conversation, she had come to know Ms Higgins 'as a close friend' and had the 'honour of seeing a side of her I rarely see in digital or print media'.

'She has provided support, comfort and reinforcement for myself and others amid some of the darkest, loneliest times. She is indeed a light, Ms Tame wrote.'

At least three posts referencing Ms Higgins remain on Grace Tame's Instagram account, including an image of the two women's Marie Claire magazine cover, posted in November 2021.

The women also appear in a photograph taken at the National Press Club, posted by Ms Tame in February last year and lauded by followers of Ms Tame's, one of whom wrote 'Grace and Brittany: thank you for speaking out'.

In an earlier post still up on Grace Tame's Instagram page, she wrote alongside an image of a lighthouse and choppy seas, that 'speaking out takes incredible coverage and I hope justice is reached'.

The post is dated one day after Ms Higgins' allegations went public on February 15, 2021.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12176351/Mystery-Grace-Tame-quietly-removes-Instagram-post-hailing-Brittany-Higgins-national-hero.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18982804

File: 16086640a8c889a⋯.jpg (2.53 MB,4256x2832,266:177,A_Virginia_class_attack_su….jpg)

>>18960157

Transfer of Virginia-class submarines advances in US

Matthew Cranston - Jun 10, 2023

Washington | US Congress has officially moved to introduce legislation that would pave the way for America’s most secret military intelligence - nuclear propelled submarines - to be transferred to Australia.

On Friday (Saturday AEST) Democrat congressman Joe Courtney along with Gregory Meeks and Ami Bera introduced the AUKUS Undersea Defense Act which provides legislative authority to allow for the transfer of Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia.

The bill would also lead to the training of Australian private sector defence personnel, as well as the integration of Australian financial contributions to the US defence industrial base.

Mr Courtney, who has been a leading voice in Congress on the military intelligence sharing pact between Australia, US and UK, known as AUKUS, sponsored the first-ever AUKUS-related legislation last year, which established a submarine officer training pipeline between the US and Australia.

“Passage of this common-sense bill, which was crafted in collaboration with the Department of Defence, will demonstrate the commitment of the US Congress to the AUKUS mission,” Mr Courtney said.

Last month two Republican senators Jim Risch and Bill Hagerty introduced the TORPEDO Act– otherwise known as Truncating Onerous Regulations for Partners and Enhancing Deterrence Operations (TORPEDO).

That bill seeks to expedite the process by which certain US defence and other controlled items and technology may be exported and reexported to Australia.

“There’s no doubt AUKUS is an ambitious agreement,” Senator Risch said, “The TORPEDO Act aims to speed up the [AUKUS] implementation process by reforming the US regulatory system so we can cooperate in a timely and efficient manner on the capabilities we and our partners need.”

Mr Risch, the most senior Republican on the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee and another leading voice on AUKUS, has sought to advance the so-called second pillar of the AUKUS focused on the development of quantum technologies, artificial intelligence and undersea capabilities.

With the rise of China’s aggressive actions in the Pacific, including tactics such as the provocative crossing of the path of an American destroyer last week, US politicians have raised concerns about the readiness of its allies in the Pacific.

The two latest bills show US Congress has lifted the implementation of AUKUS as a key priority that would enhance collective undersea defence capabilities and interoperability between the US and Australia.

In March, US President Joe Biden, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak unveiled details for the sale of up to five Virginia class nuclear submarines as well as the sharing of nuclear propulsion technology for future Australian built submarines.

https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/transfer-of-virginia-class-submarines-advances-in-us-20230610-p5dfiu

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18982955

File: 506616dfc5d024e⋯.jpg (416.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_case_for_AUKUS_let_s_g….jpg)

File: 102d85f6550ce3c⋯.jpg (773.71 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0001.jpg)

File: 1e9bbcd116a12ed⋯.jpg (764.47 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0002.jpg)

>>18960157

The case for AUKUS: let’s get things clear

While opponents like Paul Keating snipe at our strategic policies — and our new lethal weapons — they consistently spare scrutiny of China, despite its likeness to Nazi Germany in several ways.

PAUL MONK - June 10, 2023

1/4

Do you, as a reader of this newspaper, as a voter, believe our government has made sound decisions in aligning us with the US and Britain, in the AUKUS alliance, and committing to the transformation of our naval power through the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines and other weapons?

Those commitments have been politically bipartisan but are being hammered by critics outside government, with former prime minister Paul Keating leading the charge. Anthony Albanese, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles face considerable left-wing opposition within the ALP and the ACTU over the decision. At the Queensland state Labor conference in Mackay last Sunday, a move to applaud the government’s commitment to AUKUS and the nuclear-powered submarines was voted down 229 to 140.

At the ALP’s national conference in Brisbane in August we can expect more of the same. This means those commitments need to be spelled out and defended during the next couple of months. The case for AUKUS needs to be made with crystal clarity.

About a fortnight ago, in an open letter to the federal Labor government, more than 100 academics challenged AUKUS and the submarine decision on numerous grounds. Their letter is symptomatic of the groundswell of opposition that rejects the idea of nuclear-powered submarines, simply because they are nuclear-powered, and rejects the idea of buttressing our military capabilities as provocative militarism. It also challenges the idea of AUKUS as a strategic alliance on the grounds that the British and Americans are yesterday’s men. All this needs rebuffing.

While opponents of our strategic policy snipe at it and at our allies, they consistently spare China any scrutiny or criticism. Yet its vast military build-up, talk of war and fascistic approach to politics are the core concerns driving the geopolitical changes happening here and around the Indo-Pacific – in the US, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam and The Philippines.

You would never guess this reading the abovementioned open letter, or the writings and public statements of history professor and columnist James Curran, Australia-China Relations Insti­tute director James Laurenceson, former foreign minister, ACRI director and NSW premier Bob Carr and others who appear to believe our own strategic response to China’s build-up is, as Curran expressed it in a recent column, the unfortunate consequence of an “escalatory fever gripping Washington”.

It is, of course, entirely appropriate that the government be asked to clarify the thinking behind these momentous decisions. However, the critics seem to believe they know better and it’s difficult to see what answers would satisfy them, not least as regards nuclear energy. The truth is that they are confused.

Take three of the specific issues raised by the open letter and central to its case:

• That while Australia needs a submarine capability, it does not need an “offensive, long-range capability” and that the government has, until very recently, been clear that this is so.

• That AUKUS tightens our links to a declining superpower that is on the verge of lapsing into being “an illiberal democracy”.

• That instead of eight nuclear-powered submarines, we should buy “a much larger number of cheaper conventionally powered ones”.

As to the first point, the key requirement for Australia, given its geography and security interests, has always been for long-range submarines. The Collins-class boats are such submarines. The nuclear-powered ones are far better: they can go farther, linger longer, remain quieter and move faster. They also have a greater offensive capability – if push comes to shove.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18982965

File: 2078ff9d4990188⋯.jpg (232.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,AUKUS_partners_Prime_Minis….jpg)

File: c3ced98eef3e295⋯.jpg (326.43 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0003.jpg)

File: 1cde14532569cd1⋯.jpg (327.63 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0004.jpg)

>>18982955

2/4

A decade ago, as a professional consultant, I ran a series of workshops for the Submarine Institute on the question of Australia’s needs. This was before Tony Abbott’s “captain’s call” as prime minister in 2014 asking Shinzo Abe if Japan could build Australia eight nuclear-powered submarines. It was made clear in those workshops that the ideal submarine for Australia would have been the Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarine. But it was unavailable because the US would not sell it.

Short of that, it was crucial that we acquire long-range submarines capable of operating thousands of kilometres from their home bases, in the South China Sea and the Western Pacific. The question was whether they should be “son-of-Collins” constructs or a foreign buy. When the Virginia-class SSNs were made available, after other options had been explored, the opportunity was deemed too good to miss. That, in a nutshell, is why the decision was made.

As to the second concern, whether the US is “in decline” is moot. China itself is riding for a fall on numerous grounds, as Hal Brands and Michael Beckley have pointed out in their recent book Danger Zone (2022). But it seems somewhat odd for the signatories of the open letter to single out the US as in danger of becoming an illiberal democracy when China is governed in such a patently anti-liberal and repressive manner.

Ukraine was in danger of becoming an illiberal democracy, under Viktor Yanukovych, with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who runs a highly illiberal democracy, actively seeking to bring about that outcome. Instead, under Petro Poroshenko, then Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine clung to and deepened liberal democracy. Its problem was that it was insufficiently well armed to deter Russian invasion.

We do not wish to be in that position. That’s what our new strategic initiatives are all about.

As for the third point, the signatories do not specify how many conventional boats they have in mind, what kind or for what precise purpose. They do not exhibit any knowledge of exactly how submarines are used or discuss how the “much larger number” of boats would be crewed; or even how much they would cost. How, therefore, would they expect an effective response to their handwave on the subject?

But there is a fourth and more fundamental point at issue in both the open letter and the range of other rhetorical outbursts from the critics of AUKUS and the nuclear submarines. It is that somehow we are increasing the danger of war in Asia – a war they believe we would lose – by aligning ourselves with the US. The open letter signatories go so far as to assert that acquiring nuclear-powered submarines would trigger nuclear proliferation in Asia, though they don’t specify how or why.

The reality is that the system of collective security put in place by the US after 1945 has served Asia exceptionally well and there is no promising alternative on offer for the foreseeable future. This is not the assessment of only our own strategists. It is the view from Tokyo, Seoul, Manila, Taipei, Hanoi, Singapore and New Delhi. Hence the Quad. Hence the new US bases in The Philippines of Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos. And hence AUKUS.

Should the US decide, for whatever reason, to pull back from East Asia, yielding primacy to China, as emeritus professor of strategic studies Hugh White and others have long been urging, one highly predictable consequence would be nuclear proliferation. This was the message delivered in Washington recently by South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol. Japan, which faces nuclear-armed countries in China, Russia and North Korea, almost certainly would cross the nuclear threshold should the US withdraw its nuclear umbrella.

Almost no one in Australia is urging that we acquire an independent nuclear weapons capability. It defies belief, therefore, that those who disparage AUKUS and the Quad – among them Keating, former ambassador to China Geoff Raby, White, Carr, former diplomat John Menadue, some of the signatories to the open letter and others – should assert that drawing closer to the US is likely to trigger nuclear proliferation. They have it exactly wrong.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18982974

File: 3374b8f0722375e⋯.jpg (52.11 KB,768x1024,3:4,Former_prime_minister_Paul….jpg)

File: 6419dd369d2ab49⋯.jpg (287.83 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0005.jpg)

File: ca66eae3309b612⋯.jpg (320.57 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0006.jpg)

>>18982965

3/4

Equally baffling is the fact they subject China to no criticism at all and denounce those of us who do as somehow hysterical, deluded, Sinophobic, warmongering, racist and the like.

The facts of the matter are elementary. Xi Jinping’s China has undertaken – while benefiting enormously from the open markets of the West, a deluge of foreign direct investment and the global stability underwritten, at vast expense, by the US – the largest, most rapid and most comprehensive peacetime military build-up on record.

It spends, in real terms, well over $US300bn ($447bn) a year on its armed forces. That’s still less than half what the US spends. But the US is buffering the security of the world order. China is buffering no one and nothing but itself. Had the goal of the Chinese Communist Party been – as its reformers in the 1980s believed it was – to become a prosperous, democratic state and a responsible member of the international order, it would have acted differently. It is Xi’s regime that is in the grip of the “escalatory fever” alleged by Curran to be afflicting Washington.

One of the great ironies of the debate we are having in this country about these matters is that the people who object most strenuously to our considered rearmament and alliances seem almost never to pause and reflect on the fact their kind of civil dissent cannot be practised in China. That is a good part of the problem. To assert that we are or Washington is – or a future, hypothetical, illiberal America could be – the problem is comparable to having claimed, in the late 1930s, that rearming the Western democracies was a provocation to Nazi Germany.

Xi’s China is comparable to Nazi Germany in several ways and those in this country and elsewhere who still, even now, place greater priority on trading with it than on constraining it under international liberal rules are comparable to those business people in the ’30s who saw opportunities in the Third Reich (or Japan) and did not wish their governments to act in such a way as to impede the pursuit of them. Think Thomas Watson and IBM.

For as long as we allow the notion that China is simply what China has always been and that criticism of it is counterproductive, ignorant or racist, we ignore the proverbial elephant in the room. The looming danger to liberal order or stability in Asia is not an illiberal America, disturbing as that would be in several ways. It is a profoundly anti-liberal China. And that anti-liberalism is not a mere holdover from immemorial Chinese Confucian culture. It is the programmatic attitude to politics of the CCP and it is inimical to such liberal order, open trade and geopolitical stability as we have enjoyed under the Pax Americana.

Moreover, and this is the pivotal problem we face, over the past decade Xi has so configured Chinese policies and politics that we cannot, in any near timeframe, reasonably expect things to improve. That is why the Quad has taken shape. That is why AUKUS has been formed. That is why the hardest heads in our strategic and intelligence system have bought into the plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines and other advanced weapons systems: so that we can, hopefully, deter China from going to war and ride out the storm of war, should it come – as Ukraine is doing.

There is an important coda to all this. The submarines, like AUKUS, are an indication that we are digging in for what Rush Doshi, in his magisterial 2021 book-length reflection on the China problem, dubbed “the long game”. This is the democratic Anglosphere looking many decades ahead. But the crisis may well be only a few years away, not decades.

What Xi has done to Hong Kong he intends to do, if he can, to Taiwan. In fact, the notorious 14 grievances handed to us by his diplomats a few years ago indicate that he believes he can impose similar codes of conduct even in Western democracies such as Australia. We have pushed back. But the contest hasn’t come close to ending.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18982983

File: f2af83d84b31c09⋯.jpg (101.57 KB,768x1024,3:4,Bob_Carr.jpg)

File: e4ee7549aefcf0f⋯.jpg (125.31 KB,768x1024,3:4,Hugh_White.jpg)

File: 7be93cb1a6155b0⋯.jpg (87.82 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0007.jpg)

>>18982974

4/4

There are grounds for believing that time is not on Xi’s side geopolitically and that he and his generals may believe they will have to act in the 2020s or lose the long game. This is the point made compellingly by Brands and Beckley in Danger Zone. In that context, we have Collins-class submarines, not nuclear-powered ones. And we need to think very, very clearly about what contingencies we may face and how best to position ourselves to defend our core interests, should they arise.

We allowed ourselves, for 20 years after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, to believe the CCP would see the error of its ways and liberalise. We clung – as we profited handsomely from China’s rapid economic growth – to the hope that a rising tide would lift all boats. We miscalculated. The party is not for turning. It is aggressively anti-liberal. It seeks, like Putin, to overturn the liberal international order. That’s why AUKUS now exists.

Paul Monk is a fellow of the Institute for Law and Strategy (London and New York). He was head of the China desk in Australia’s Defence Intelligence Organisation in the mid-1990s. His classic 2005 text Thunder From the Silent Zone: Rethinking China has just been reissued in a second, updated edition.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/aukus-and-its-critics-lets-get-things-clear/news-story/10e3156055ad648dc50ab1e9df7c6a0a

https://johnmenadue.com/an-open-letter-to-the-australian-government-from-concerned-scholars-regarding-the-aukus-agreement/

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VK9wHMikdFx5vW9GJjFx2m5LJ_7q9xRk/view

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18983042

File: 6a2af2b30003f6c⋯.jpg (123.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_pair_of_Australian_FA_18….jpg)

>>18949906

>>18971125

White House asked to approve Australian F/A-18 Hornets for Ukraine

BEN PACKHAM - JUNE 8, 2023

Kyiv has formally asked the White House to green light the transfer of the RAAF’s fleet of retired F/A-18 Hornets to Ukraine under a commercial deal with a US aerospace company that has the rights to buy the aircraft.

If the US approves the deal, Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles will be urged to make the sale happen, according to an Australian adviser to the Ukraine government who has been helping to broker the sale.

Australian, American and Ukrainian officials are understood to have had initial discussions on the potential agreement in which Texas company RAVN Aerospace – which has paid a deposit for 41 of the jets – would on-sell its stake to Kyiv.

As the Albanese government works on a fresh support package for Ukraine to be unveiled next month, a senior Defence source warned there remained “many hurdles” to providing Australia’s “Classic Hornets” to Kyiv.

They include a lack of personnel to make the jets airworthy, and insufficient spare parts for the aircraft in Australia.

But Robert Potter, an Australian cybersecurity expert who is advising the Zelensky government, said the US Defence Department had already examined what it would take to get the aircraft flying again.

“The Pentagon engaged Boeing to give a view on whether the planes could be restored. Boeing said all of the planes could be brought to an airworthy condition within six months,” Mr Potter told The Australian.

“These planes would go to the US, where there would be access to American parts.”

He said he understood Kyiv had secured commitments from foreign volunteer pilots who were qualified to fly the aircraft.

The retired F/A-18s are in a hangar at the Williamtown RAAF base outside Newcastle.

If they are not sent to Ukraine they are likely to be scrapped, with RAVN Aerospace understood to be no longer interested in using them for training.

“That’s really the choice here – Ukraine can use them to fight the Russians, or they can be destroyed,” Mr Potter said.

Washington has approved Western allies to supply Ukraine with advanced fighter jets amid an escalation of air attacks on the capital, but the country is yet to source any aircraft.

Ukraine’s efforts to secure Australia’s Hornets are being led by the country’s Deputy Prime Minister for Innovation and Technology Mykhailo Federov.

Ukraine’s Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov confirmed after meeting with Mr Marles on the weekend that Australia was preparing to announce a new package of support for Ukraine.

The announcement is likely to coincide with Anthony Albanese’s trip to the NATO Leaders’ Summit in Lithuania in July.

The opposition attacked the delay in unveiling fresh assistance, saying “the timing of announcements of support for a friend in need … should not be beholden to media schedules or ministerial visits”.

In a letter to Mr Marles, the opposition’s foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham and defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said they were concerned Australia was no longer pulling its weight as a key supporter to Ukraine.

They urged “the swift announcement of a new and comprehensive package”, urging “thorough consideration” of Ukraine’s requests for F/A-18 Hornets, Hawkei protected vehicles, M1 Abrams tanks, and de-mining equipment.

The Prime Minister said on the weekend that announcements on further support would be made “when they’re ready to be made”.

The RAAF fleet of 71 F/A-18A/B Hornet aircraft, together with spares and support equipment, was progressively withdrawn from service from January 2019 to December 2021.

A Defence spokeswoman said the department retained possession of the aircraft.

“The Australian Government remains committed to delivering on its current contribution to Ukraine,” the spokeswoman said.

“Australia continues to engage with the Government of Ukraine and our allies and partners to ensure meaningful support continues to be provided to Ukraine in its ongoing battle against Russian aggression.”

Australia has committed about $680 million of support to Ukraine, including more than $510 million in military assistance.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/white-house-asked-to-approve-australian-fa18-hornets-for-ukraine/news-story/5ee2d2c8978ba5c591e1280905bd306f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18983065

File: 8c2197967c47509⋯.jpg (604.4 KB,1950x1097,1950:1097,Robert_Potter_in_Kyiv_in_M….jpg)

File: 546bc41fa580098⋯.jpg (227.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ukraine_s_Deputy_Prime_Min….jpg)

>>18971125

>>18983042

‘Mystery man’ Robert Potter leads fighter jet talks in Ukraine

BEN PACKHAM -JUNE 9, 2023

1/2

An Adelaide-born cyber security entrepreneur has emerged as a central figure in a proposed international arms deal to sell retired Australian fighter jets to Ukraine.

Internet 2.0 co-founder Robert Potter has an agreement with Ukraine’s Digital Transformation Ministry to provide cyber security tools and training to support the country’s war against Russia.

But Mr Potter’s role in the ­potential sale of up to 41 former RAAF F/A-18 Hornets to the country has raised eyebrows in Ukraine and Australia, with the Kyiv Post newspaper this week describing his involvement as “unconventional”.

The Albanese government has pushed back on the prospect of such a deal, saying the aircraft aren’t on Ukraine’s “wishlist” of equipment it was seeking from Australia.

But The Weekend Australian has confirmed the proposal has been under discussion for several weeks in Canberra and Washington, and is being actively considered as a means to secure much-needed fighter jets for Ukraine.

Mr Potter represents US firm RAVN, which has the rights to buy 41 of the former F/A-18 Hornets and wants to sell the aircraft to Kyiv in a commercial transaction.

RAVN declined to comment, but did not dispute recent reports on the negotiations.

The sale will require the formal support of the Australian and US governments, while Kyiv will need to stump up the cash from its Ukraine24 fundraising arm.

One of its backers rated the prospect of the deal coming off at about “80 per cent”.

While Australia has had no diplomatic representation in Ukraine since the start of the war, Mr Potter has been a frequent visitor to the country over the past seven months, and has struck up close relationships with senior officials in Volodymyr Zelensky’s administration.

Key among them is Mykhailo Fedorov, a close Zelensky confidant who serves as Ukraine’s Deputy Prime Minister for Innovation, Education, Science and Technology, and is a leading figure in the country’s international fundraising efforts.

Mr Potter said he was not in Ukraine to make money, but believed his work there would pay dividends in the long run.

“I think if you believe your tech works – and my tech does work – then you need to put your money where your mouth is and put it to the test on the battlefield,” he said.

“If it stands up to that, it’ll stand up to anything. It’s the best market proof you could possibly have for anything in this industry.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18983068

File: 8517cc061bcdda5⋯.jpg (273.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Robert_Potter_in_his_compa….jpg)

>>18983065

2/2

The self-taught programmer with a masters degree in national security studies from Flinders University has previously been a media commentator on cyber security, intelligence and geopolitics.

His CV says he worked for two years as BAE Systems’ “Head of Cyber Operations” in Sydney, and in an undisclosed cyber security role for the Australian government for two years and six months. He also lists past cyber ­security contracting positions with the US and Canadian governments.

Mr Potter’s company, co-founded with former army intelligence officer David Robinson, is backed by Joe Hockey’s Bondi Partners, among others, and counts retired major general Fergus McLachlan and former South Australian innovation minister Tom Kenyon as non-executive directors.

Mr Kenyon conceded that Mr Potter might appear to be an “international man of mystery”, but said the impression was driven by circumstance.

“We've been prepared to go somewhere where other people aren’t. Opportunities and unusual circumstances arise just because we’re there,” he said.

The firm, which has the US State Department as one of its major clients, sells two technological tools – a patented “cloaking” firewall that is said to hide networks from detection, and a digital sandbox that can be used to safely analyse files for malware.

The company made headlines earlier this year with its analysis of Chinese social media app TikTok, revealing it collected masses of data from users and had a “server connection to mainland China”.

In March, Mr Potter and Mr Robinson popped up at a two-day White House conference on the threat posed by ransomware. They were the only Australian firm invited to the event in a development that left mainstream competitors scratching their heads.

Major General McLachlan, who is highly respected in national security circles, said Potter’s willingness to go to work on the “cyber frontline” in Ukraine had won him respect in Kyiv, where he was putting his “reasonably high level of access” to good use.

He said Potter was a “disrupter”, who “says stuff and does things that aren’t normally done in Canberra”.

“He sees problems differently, and often comes up with different solutions than perhaps those of us who've grown up inside the bureaucracy,” Major General McLachlan said.

“It means he is not always easy to work with, including for me, but I’ve learned to respect the fact that these guys get shit done.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/mystery-man-robert-potter-leads-fighter-jet-talks-in-ukraine/news-story/8607eea8e08f53d8a088f95f05062aeb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18983102

File: 7c2f72a538b9a4d⋯.jpg (125.27 KB,1600x972,400:243,US_Navy_FA_18_Super_Hornet….jpg)

File: 350766418fd2bb7⋯.jpg (66.02 KB,800x533,800:533,Ukraine_s_for_Deputy_Minis….jpg)

>>18971125

>>18983065

Aussie Fighter Jets for Ukraine? More Questions Than Answers

The mandate for such a deal or for the Australian cyber-security consultant who appears associated with it remains unclear after Kyiv Post investigated.

Pete Shmigel - June 7, 2023

1/2

Following the international spread of a media report that Australia and the US were negotiating with Ukraine about providing retired Australian F/A-18 aircraft, doubts about the alleged deal have emerged.

Yesterday, the Australian Financial Review (AFR), a highly respected newspaper, published a report by two very well-regarded journalists that Australia, the US and Ukraine “are discussing sending 41 Royal Australian Air Force F/A-18 Hornets to Kyiv.”

AFR further said that “the retired F/A-18s are sitting in a hangar at the Williamtown RAAF base outside Newcastle and, unless sent to Ukraine, will either be scrapped or sold to a private sector aviation company, RAVN Aerospace, to use in the US as ‘enemies’ for military aviators to train against.”

Unnamed sources were cited as telling AFR that “the US, which recently gave permission to other Western allies to supply Ukraine with advanced fighter aircraft is favorably disposed to the idea of gifting Ukraine the F/A-18s.”

AFR then said that Robert Potter, “an Australian security expert advising the Ukrainian government”, confirmed negotiations were underway, but a specific deal is yet to be finalized.

During a recent interview, Potter has also been referred to by Sky News Australia as “an advisor to the Ukrainian government and defense force.”

Given the Ukrainian government has repeatedly said that fighter aircraft are critical to their country’s defense, Kyiv Post sought to establish the bona fides of developments reported by AFR.

First, while fighter aircraft are a key imperative for Ukraine in general, Kyiv Post that understands that they are not on the “list” of official Ukrainian government requests of Canberra, as Australia has other capabilities that Ukraine seeks on a priority basis.

Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Richard Marles did not provide either confirmation or denial to AFR regarding alleged Hornet negotiations, but is believed to be finalising a further package of military aid for Ukraine, potentially to coincide with the NATO Summit in Vilnius.

Second, Ukraine’s Ministry for Digital Transformation’s aims are cyber-security and providing digital services to the Ukrainian public; it has no stated role in defense procurement outside of cyber-security.

Kyiv Post has therefore emailed the Ministry for comment on whether it has been especially tasked to negotiate with Australia about fighter aircraft, the potential status of those negotiations, and the role of Robert Potter in them.

Thirdly, the self-declared participation of Robert Potter in any potential negotiation – no less it being made public – appears unconventional. Potter is the Co-CEO of Internet 2.0, a Canberra-based cyber security company.

As separately reported by AFR, in December 2022, Internet 2.0 signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Ukraine’s Ministry for Digital Transformation to train Ukrainian war veterans in cybersecurity to ward off hackers.

“As a part of the agreement, Internet 2.0 technologies will be trialed and deployed, veterans and temporarily displaced persons will be trained in cybersecurity and other digital skills, and the company will open an office in Ukraine,” Potter then said.

There is no mention of defense procurement in the media report about the MoU, whether for cyber-security or otherwise.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18983112

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18983102

2/2

On the company’s website, Potter’s biography says he “invented the company’s core patented technology” and “is an experienced cyber security leader.”

It continues that he “has held roles as Head of Cyber Operations at BAE Systems, GM of WithYouWithMe Cyber, advisor to the Australian Shadow Cabinet for Cyber Security, and lead SME [subject matter expert – ed.] for North Korean Cyber Security for the United States Department of State (CTR Program).”

About its products and services, Internet 2.0’s website says that it’s technology solution “provides a critical defense barrier for your business against attack” and that it employs “world-class experts comprised of ex-military and intelligence specialists.”

The website does not make any mention of the company’s potential work or capabilities in the areas of defense procurement or international relations, but Potter has appeared as a general media commentator on Australian outlets on Ukrainian events.

Potter’s LinkedIn profile indicates he has been Co-CEO of Internet 2.0 since March 2019.

It then lists him as a “Cyber Security SME” for: the US State Department from September 2019 to the present; for Global Affairs Canada from October 2020 to the present, and; for CRDF Global from September 2019 to the present. The profile suggests that some of this work involved North Korean hacking, and another AFR media report is provided.

In May 2021, AFR reported that “working with the US State Department, Canberra-based start-up Internet 2.0 has run cyber security training across Latin America, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific, including with Australia’s closest neighbors.”

“We essentially help institutions globally in the financial services space build up their defenses and become more aware of the kind of threats to their environment from North Korean hackers,” Potter told AFR in that interview.

The SME engagements appear to be consultancies performed by either Potter or his company for clients.

Potter’s last job outside consulting appears to be, according to LinkedIn, two years and two months with WithYouWithMe, a “social impact organization” that may recruit people for employment using digital means. Its website has only an email contact, but it lists offices in Washington, Ottawa, London and Sydney.

The website says that “given our extensive network of veterans and strong relationships with militaries across the Five Eyes, we hold one of the largest talent pools of security-cleared technologists in the world.”

Potter’s LinkedIn date for completing at WithYouWithMe is March 2020 – which cuts across his current Co-CEO role and his SME appointments. Kyiv Post has contacted the company for confirmation.

His profile also says that Potter was Head of Cyber Operation at BAE Systems Applied Intelligence from Jan 2017 to Dec 2018, and that he also previously worked as a political staffer for a State Government and as a research assistant to former Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, while the latter was based at Harvard University.

It also notes he was an “advisor to the Australian Shadow Cabinet for Cyber Security.” There does not appear to be any known formal position of such a description; the office of the former Australian Shadow Minister for Cyber Security has been contacted for comment.

Kyiv Post has contacted Potter via Internet 2.0’s corporate email to ask him about the status of the negotiations about the Australian jet fighters, and his qualifications, role and mandate in such negotiations.

Pete Shmigel is an Australian writer. With a background in politics, business, sustainability, the military and mental health, he has been published by the major newspapers in Australia. He helped initiate Lifeline Ukraine.

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/17976

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/retired-raaf-fighter-jets-could-be-sent-to-ukraine-20230605-p5de0h

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC5ip3XwPg8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

21e358 No.18984635

Does any anon have a ciggie here, I’m waiting for a lazy American baker to come up to bat?

Just thought I’d say hello! Kek

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

21e358 No.18984641

>>18984635

Sorry I bombed a serious thread, didn't mean to be a bogan

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18987561

File: b3134fdd608d98d⋯.jpg (198.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Michaelia_Cash_has_demande….jpg)

File: bc627b2735e1e0f⋯.jpg (179.85 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_interview….jpg)

File: c261362b7c36da2⋯.jpg (400.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

File: 08e8878b89bfce8⋯.jpg (147.47 KB,1724x970,862:485,Lisa_Wilkinson.jpg)

File: 403097877a16a0a⋯.jpg (229.61 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Shadow_attorney_general_Mi….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Cash demands answers as new Wilkinson recording surfaces

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - JUNE 11, 2023

Michaelia Cash has demanded Network 10 release the full five-hour recording of a pre-interview with Brittany Higgins in which The Project journalist Lisa Wilkinson discusses with her covertly recording the Liberal senator, who was then her boss.

It previously came to light Ms Higgins secretly recorded a phone call with Senator Cash – the then-employment minister and now opposition legal affairs spokeswoman – shortly after her resignation from Parliament House.

The five-hour leaked recording was made in the days before Ms Higgins appeared on The Project airing allegations she was sexually assaulted by a then unnamed Liberal staffer, now known to be Bruce Lehrmann, who has consistently denied the allegations.

This portion of the conversation between Ms Higgins, her boyfriend David Sharaz, Wilkinson and producer Angus Llewellyn begins with Ms Higgins telling the group her phone had been remotely wiped in the past.

Wilkinson says: “What do you think about on the last day, Brittany saying, ‘Can someone please tell me what happened to my phone? Because all of the data got wiped and that includes all my photos’ … Just to see what their response is.”

Ms Higgins replies: “What’s the validity of me recording any of these conversations, though? Like, if, say, if I did have that conversation, I would feel safer having it recorded. But can I record those sort of conversations?”

Wilkinson directs the question to producer Llewellyn, who explains there are different rules in different states. “Canberra operates, and Parliament House operates … in a wacky, wacky world.”

Ms Higgins says: “Even off the record, just for corroboration’s sake, I’d be willing to record something of that conversation, if that happens. Yeah.”

Llewellyn: “Yeah.”

Speaking over each other, Wilkinson says, “It may mean that we can’t use it … But this is just for your own …” and Ms Higgins says, “Yeah, exactly. And just sort of, for your background, I guess …”

Llewellyn: “Yeah.”

Ms Higgins: “As like a sort of, a sounding board about what it’s like. I’d do that for you.”

Senator Cash appeared on Sky News on Sunday, fired up after having just read a news report with the leaked recording and said it was “incredibly, incredibly disturbing” that she would entertain any kind of recording of private conversations.

She demanded Channel 10 “formally release the five-hour recording” and said all of Australia had a right to see what went on in that interview.

“That a senior journalist in Lisa Wilkinson, and the producer of The Project, would actively have encouraged a young woman in a distressed situation to basically commit what is considered to be an illegal offence by recording a conversation with another person.

“Personally, I think Channel 10, The Project and Lisa Wilkinson have some very, very serious questions to answer.”

Network 10 said they would not be making any further comment at this time but previously told The Australian there was “no justifiable reason” for the private five-hour conversation to be made public”.

“Network 10 was subpoenaed to provide confidential documents and audio recordings to the DPP and Bruce Lehrmann’s legal team during the criminal case brought against Mr Lehrmann,” a Network 10 spokesman said.

The Australian approached Wilkinson for comment.

In previous days, she said in a statement the private conversation was “not intended to appear as it has out of context and in the public arena”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/cash-demands-answers-as-new-wilkinson-recording-surfaces/news-story/a848b2fabe6c0436ad1921661318447c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18987606

File: 99d437ff0df72bc⋯.mp4 (15.91 MB,640x360,16:9,Senator_Katy_Gallagher_con….mp4)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Minister under siege digs in for a fight

Katy Gallagher was defiant and all but silent as she flew into a Canberra firestorm over her knowledge of Brittany Higgins’s rape allegations.

LIAM MENDES and GREG BROWN - 11 June 2023

1/2

Federal Finance Minister Katy Gallagher was defiant and all but silent as she flew into a Canberra firestorm over her knowledge of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations, as Anthony Albanese’s ministers prepare to “back her to the hilt” against a Coalition onslaught in parliament this week.

Peter Dutton’s Senate team will focus its question time attacks throughout the week on Senator Gallagher after she conceded knowing about the rape allegations days before Ms Higgins went public, despite telling the parliament in 2021 that “no one had any knowledge”.

After a rapturous reception from Labor’s female activists at a Perth conference and the firm backing of the Prime Minister over the weekend, Senator Gallagher – wearing a “Women’s Spirit Network” hoodie – had no patience for questions as she landed back in the national capital.

“I’ve got nothing to say,” she said repeatedly after touching down in the ACT.

Senator Gallagher’s prior knowledge of the allegations was revealed in The Australian last week through leaked text message exchanges between Ms Higgins and partner David Sharaz.

Senator Gallagher is claiming she did not mislead the Senate because she was “responding to an assertion that was being made by minister (Linda) Reynolds at the time that we had known about this for weeks and had made a decision to weaponise it”.

Labor MPs were strongly supportive of Senator Gallagher on Sunday, with one minister declaring the government would “back her to the hilt”. Government MPs said they believed the Coalition’s pursuit of questions about Senator Gallagher and Ms Higgins could backfire on the Opposition Leader’s standing with women, and that the opposition would begin to restrain themselves.

When approached by The Australian at Canberra Airport, Senator Gallagher would not clarify why her 2021 statement to the Senate did not encompass the fact she knew about Ms Higgins’ rape claim ahead of it being revealed by News Corp Australia and Network Ten’s The Project.

“I refer you to the statement because I have addressed that,” she said. “I’ve addressed this in the statement.”

If Senator Gallagher does not elaborate on her weekend statement in parliament this week the onus will be on the Coalition to push for transparency on the issue by backing a Senate inquiry.

A motion to establish a Senate inquiry is being considered by the Coalition but would need the support of the senate crossbench to be established.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18987616

File: 7bc4b580584d63c⋯.jpg (776.77 KB,1905x1429,1905:1429,Senator_Katy_Gallagher_arr….jpg)

>>18987606

2/2

Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash – who Ms Higgins worked for before she spectacularly quit and went public with her rape allegations – said Senator Gallagher still had questions about potentially misleading parliament.

“I believe that the explanation that has now been given is not adequate,” Senator Cash told Sky News. “I believe that it is very, very flimsy. It does not accord with the indignation that she showed.

“But more than that, messages say she was also given a copy of The Project interview prior to The Project interview actually going to air, are you actually telling me she didn’t read it?

“She didn’t talk to members of the Labor Party about it.

“As I said, there are very serious questions here, which need to be answered.”

Ms Higgins’ former boss was also furious at the revelations that Channel 10 star Lisa Wilkinson had suggested Ms Higgins secretly record her conversations with the Liberal frontbencher – which is illegal in the ACT – in a five-hour pre-record conversation before The Project interview.

Signalling Labor’s defence tactics ahead of the parliamentary week, Aged Care Minister Anika Wells said no one in Canberra had done more to address women’s issues in parliament than Senator Gallagher.

“The political conjecture that has gone on this week about this issue, I find pretty horrifying,” Ms Wells told The Australian.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong also over the weekend admitted she knew “some details” of the rape allegations before they were made public, as the Coalition accuses Labor of weaponising the issue.

Former prime minister Scott Morrison has also been accused of misleading parliament by the political staffer at the centre of the allegations. In an interview with The Weekend Australian, Mr Morrison’s director of ­operations, Fiona Brown, said her former boss misled parliament when he claimed to have spoken to her about Ms Higgins.

The Australian understands the Albanese government is unlikely to pursue Mr Morrison over Ms Brown’s claims.

The controversy is expected to dominate the final sitting fortnight before the winter break, as the government attempts to secure support for the creation of the $10bn fund for public and affordable housing.

The Greens have called on Labor to meet them halfway, demanding $2.5bn for public and affordable housing and a rent freeze. Housing Minister Julie Collins said she was “working across the parliament” to secure support for the Bill, adding that a rent freeze was outside the government’s power to deliver as it fell to the states and territories.

The Senate is also expected to be dominated by debate over the voice to parliament.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/katy-gallagher-digs-in-over-brittany-higgins-scandal/news-story/b6c3defafb9b839ca3d3c8aa6736e856

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18987638

File: da40b12781993d6⋯.jpg (188.82 KB,1199x721,1199:721,The_logo_of_the_Internatio….jpg)

File: 3cff03a95841c1e⋯.jpg (173.91 KB,1199x675,1199:675,Li_Song_L_China_s_ambassad….jpg)

>>18960157

>>18982955

IAEA must not bend rules for AUKUS: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn - 2023-06-11

Li Song, China's permanent representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency, once again stressed that the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal is a cover for nuclear proliferation at the board meeting of the IAEA in Vienna on Thursday.

No matter how far the de facto anti-China bloc has gone to justify the deal, they cannot deny its fundamental nature, which is the transfer of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium from two nuclear-weapon states to a non-nuclear-weapon state.

That violates the principles and practices of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and severely undermines the international non-proliferation regime and the IAEA's safeguards system.

Thursday's meeting marked the eighth consecutive time the IAEA has reviewed the AUKUS issue through intergovernmental discussions.

But rather than addressing the international community's concerns with concrete actions, fulfilling their non-proliferation obligations, and maintaining candid and transparent communication with other parties on the basis of equality and mutual respect, the AUKUS countries have attempted to depict their nuclear submarine deal as a routine safeguards issue between a non-nuclear-weapon state and the IAEA Secretariat.

They have requested the IAEA invoke Article 14 of the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement to make safeguards exemption arrangements, which, as the Chinese envoy stressed, is "a clandestine move to coerce the IAEA Secretariat into endorsing their cooperation". To bypass the nuclear nonproliferation rules, the AUKUS countries claimed they would work out suitable arrangements with the IAEA Secretariat. Such a move is not only of no legitimacy, but also sets a bad example.

The representatives of more than 20 countries put forward different perspectives on the AUKUS deal that involves complicated political, security, legal and technical issues. In the face of such opposition, since AUKUS unilaterally announced the deal in September 2021, the three countries have sought to divide the members of the nuclear energy watchdog into confrontational blocs.

Interestingly, the Western media organizations have neither reported these countries' concerns nor AUKUS' dirty underhand dealings within the IAEA, even if promoting nuclear nonproliferation has always been regarded as political correctness in their editorial policies.

The IAEA Secretariat should comply with the IAEA Statute and the mandates of member states, rather than yield to the pressure of the US.

In the eyes of the three countries, all of the IAEA rules are expendable. The more they try to advance the AUKUS deal in an underhand way, the more all countries need to join hands to steadily advance an open, inclusive, transparent and sustainable intergovernmental discussion process on the issue.

https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202306/11/WS64859dc0a31033ad3f7bb98d.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18987672

File: 94b9ec0d62d015d⋯.jpg (129.58 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_Catholic_church_is_now….jpg)

‘Red flags everywhere’: high court asks Catholic church why it didn’t investigate priest’s abuse 50 years ago

High court of Australia is considering a NSW court’s permanent stay in a case brought by a woman who alleges she was abused as a 14-year-old

Christopher Knaus - 8 Jun 2023

The high court has pressed the Catholic church to explain why it didn’t have an adequate opportunity 50 years ago to investigate the extent of a priest’s abuse of children, given there were “red flags everywhere” about his crimes.

The court on Thursday began hearing a key case about a legal tactic now routinely being employed by the church and other institutions to permanently shield themselves from abuse survivors’ civil claims for compensation.

Institutions are now regularly seeking permanent stays, or a permanent halt to proceedings, by arguing the death of alleged perpetrators and the inability to obtain their response to a survivor’s allegations leaves them unable to receive a fair trial.

The approach has infuriated survivors and their advocates, who say the church is now effectively using the passage of time to avoid trial, despite the fact the church systemically and deliberately concealed abuse for decades in dioceses across Australia.

Critics argue the approach is also at odds with the findings of the royal commission about the vast barriers that survivors face in coming forwards, which delay their complaints by an average of 22 years.

The high court is considering the New South Wales court of appeal’s decision to grant the Lismore diocese a permanent stay in one case, brought by GLJ, a woman who alleges she was abused as a 14-year-old by Lismore priest Father Clarence Anderson.

The church argues that Anderson’s death in 1996, well before GLJ’s complaint, denied it the opportunity to seek a response from him and leaves it unable to properly contradict or challenge GLJ’s account.

It says it has been left “utterly in the dark” over whether the abuse occurred.

But the high court heard that the church had held evidence about his abuse of other children from 1971, the year of his defrocking.

Justice Jayne Jagot asked counsel for the church, Bret Walker SC, why it did not have an adequate opportunity between 1971 and Anderson’s death in 1996 to make broader inquiries with the former priest and other church officials about the extent of his abuse.

“From 1971, there are red flags everywhere about this person,” Jagot said.

Walker said that such inquiries would only have uncovered anything about GLJ or her alleged abuse by chance.

“It would have been happenstance only by which that inquiry would have raised anything about the appellant,” he said.

Permanent stays are typically reserved for extraordinary or exceptional situations in which a fair trial is not possible.

But GLJ’s counsel, Perry Herzfeld SC, and solicitors, Ken Cush and Associates, argue that the long passage of time in abuse cases such as GLJ’s makes the degradation of evidence and deaths of perpetrators common.

Herzfeld said there needed to be a greater tolerance for the loss of evidentiary records in such cases.

Otherwise, he said, permanent stays would become “routine”, rather than exceptional.

“The inevitability of the long passage of time and the inevitability of the impoverishment of the evidentiary record means that one has to approach these applications with a greater tolerance for that,” he said.

He also argued that, in GLJ’s case, the church held a wealth of evidence about Anderson’s abuse of other children, including statements from four other survivors – the material which allowed for a fair trial to take place.

Herzfeld said there was no need for Anderson to be alive for the church to challenge GLJ’s account through cross-examination.

“If defendants decide to contest a plaintiff’s account … they don’t need a contrary witness in order to have a proper basis to do so,” he said.

The hearing continues before the high court.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jun/08/red-flags-everywhere-high-court-asks-catholic-church-why-it-didnt-investigate-priests-abuse-50-years-ago

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18987818

File: eefb1312f7cedfe⋯.jpg (3.62 MB,5518x3646,2759:1823,Revealed_the_chef_selling_….jpg)

Australian deaths from ‘suicide kits’ linked to global investigation

Rob Harris and Anthony Galloway - June 11, 2023

1/2

The deaths of several Australians by suicide have been linked to a now global investigation into a Canadian chef who has been charged in his homeland with selling a lethal substance online to vulnerable people all over the world.

Australian law enforcement agencies have joined investigators in Britain, the United States, Italy, New Zealand and Canada to investigate alleged suicide kits sent by Kenneth Law who, for almost two years, used a website to sell a poison that at-risk people could use to end their lives.

Law, 57, was charged last month with aiding the suicide of two people in Canada who bought his kits online, with police revealing that he had sent more than 1200 packages to more than 40 countries using a popular payment firm. He has been linked to as many as 20 deaths, including four British citizens in their 20s and 30s and one teen in the US.

The hotel cook was exposed after he told an undercover reporter for The Times newspaper last month that he had sold the kits online and said that “many, many, many, many” people had died.

Security sources inside the federal government, who were not authorised to speak publicly, confirmed that Australian Federal Police, state police agencies and Australian Border Force were aware that at least 10 packages containing the same substance had been sent to people in Australia, resulting in several deaths.

There is extreme sensitivity inside policing agencies about the deaths, considering that the substance is not banned at the border, making it more difficult for Border Force to stop it getting into the country. This masthead has chosen not to name the substance to avoid advertising its availability.

Australian customs law prohibits devices and documents relating to suicide, but the substance is not prohibited at the border under current regulations since it is, typically in diluted form, often used in food preparation. Where customs officers believe – usually through the assistance of international partners – that a particular product will be used for suicide, regulations apply, and it is stopped at the border.

However, in many of the Australian cases, the substance and the kits were sent in separate packages – with the recipient then assembling the kit locally – evading the detection of authorities.

The AFP would not confirm whether it was formally investigating Law, nor would it comment on how many names were thought to be on Law’s Australian mailing list or how many people were subsequently found to have died.

Border Force said it did not comment on individual circumstances, or on matters that may be subject to ongoing investigations but was “aware of the attempted import of packages containing goods relating to suicide”.

“The ABF works with domestic and international law enforcement partners to prevent harmful materials reaching Australia,” a spokeswoman said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18987823

File: bbf00f76f37fa7c⋯.jpg (1.78 MB,4107x2311,4107:2311,Kenneth_Law_appears_in_cou….jpg)

>>18987818

2/2

Law, a former aerospace engineer working at a high-end hotel kitchen in Toronto, has denied reports that he was willingly selling products to help people die by suicide.

An archived version of his website suggests it sold packets of the substance from 2021 until this past March. In April, The Times first reported Law had been “sending the substance to vulnerable people around the world”.

Investigators alleged he operated several companies to send packages including Imtime Cuisine, AmbuCA, ACademic, Escape Mode (also branded as escMode), and ICemac.

Law told the undercover Times reporter, who posed as a suicidal buyer, that people said he was doing “God’s work”. The newspaper reported the business was described by Law as an “avenue of escape”.

He is alleged to have disguised the website’s true purpose from authorities.

Separately, Amazon is facing a lawsuit from families who allege the e-commerce giant knowingly sold “suicide kits”, including lethal substances and a book on suicide.

The substance is a crystalline powder with broad industrial applications.

There has been growing concern among health authorities and coroners about its availability in the past five years as it rapidly increased as a method of pharmacological suicide, with doctors describing some of those deaths as “excruciating”.

Early last year, the Therapeutic Goods Association amended its poisons regulations to capture all products with concentrations of the substance above 15 per cent after the study of 17 deaths reported to state and territory coroners in 2017 and 2018 where it was involved. While there is a lag in national data, separate medical studies revealed a huge increase in suicides using the substance in Victoria and South Australia in the past few years, who are mostly male (65 per cent) and aged between 24 and 66.

About 80 per cent of people who had deliberately taken the substance died. In most cases, there was some level of psychiatric illness or depression but less than 10 per cent had a terminal illness.

While state public health actions to date have focused on means restriction, improved antidote stocking and clinical education, coronial studies have called for greater national and international collaboration or monitoring promoted lethal substances online.

Support is available from Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800 and Lifeline on 13 11 14.

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australian-deaths-from-suicide-kits-linked-to-global-investigation-20230609-p5dfbk.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18987863

File: 018b789a1bb5994⋯.mp4 (15.96 MB,640x1080,16:27,353033767_724483309453894_….mp4)

Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post

11 June 2023

Always Ready

Check out U.S. Marines with MRF-D as they conduct an embassy reinforcement scenario at Mount Bundey Training Area!

#AlliesandPartners #FreeandOpenIndoPacific #MRFD #embassy

(U.S. Marine Corps Video by Cpl. Brayden Daniel)

https://www.facebook.com/MRFDarwin/videos/mrf-d-marines-conduct-an-embassy-reinforcement/584594987146282/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992075

File: 16271d9e4c017ae⋯.jpg (276.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Julie_Szego_told_The_Austr….jpg)

File: 787040ecb21e893⋯.jpg (73.38 KB,768x1024,3:4,Patrick_Elligett_editor_of….jpg)

File: 6a5dba46d2b3c5b⋯.jpg (435.22 KB,825x1068,275:356,JS_1.jpg)

>>18940103

>>18945832

The Age sacks columnist Julie Szego amid gender furore

JAMES MADDEN - JUNE 12, 2023

The editor of The Age has sacked one of the masthead’s star columnists, Julie Szego, after she took aim at the publication over its ­refusal to run an article on youth gender transition.

Last week, Szego posted on ­social media that while she had been commissioned to write a feature-length story about the contentious issue by the newspaper’s former editor Gay Alcorn, The Age’s current boss Patrick Elligett refused to run it.

Szego, a freelancer who has written for The Age on and off for more than two decades, subsequently chose to self-publish the 5000-word piece on her own Substack page, telling her social media followers about her new blog: “I’ll be writing about gender identity politics … without the copy being rendered unreadable by a committee of woke journalists redacting words they deem incendiary, such as ‘male’.”

Szego told The Australian that the post about her colleagues at The Age was “a vague and cheeky comment that was not intended to put anyone down”, but it had been cited by Elligett as a reason to sack her as a columnist.

“I love my former comrades at The Age,” Szego said.

“I have no bitterness whatsoever, but this issue of gender identity politics is causing tensions in newsrooms around the world and The Age is no different.”

Szego said she believed her story was “measured”, and that despite suggestions to the contrary she does not hold a firm view one way or another on paediatric transition.

Szego also said the fact that she attended the controversial Let Women Speak rally in Melbourne in March had been used as part of a whispering campaign against her.

“I attended the rally, I was conspicuous with notebook and pen,” she said. “I attended as a journalist because I wanted to get some colour from the event as I’m hoping to write a book on the wider debate.

“My attendance at the rally caused great suspicion in there (The Age’s newsroom).”

Elligett told The Australian that he explained to Szego why he would not publish the article, and said The Age “continues to cover the issue of gender policy with balance, nuance and accuracy. It is an issue many of our competitors will not touch.”

Szego’s interpretation of that conversation with Elligett this month differs.

“Patrick told me he could not publish my piece under my byline because it would damage the reputation of the masthead,” she said on Sunday. “I would suggest he’s damaged the masthead more by not publishing it.”

Szego said she received a text message from Elligett last week, informing her that she would no longer be writing for The Age ­because of her social media post about her “woke” colleagues.

“Obviously we can’t have our columnists publicly disparaging the publication like that so we won’t be commissioning further columns from you,” Elligett said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/the-age-sacks-columnist-julie-szego-amid-gender-furore/news-story/86923fb2320e2fae68bc5bd31b481365

https://twitter.com/JulieSzego/status/1665905346412699648

A QUESTION OF TRANSITION - Youth gender treatment under scrutiny

JULIE SZEGO - 4 JUN 2023

This is a piece The Age refused to publish. It is the first in a series I’ll be posting here.

https://szegounplugged.substack.com/p/a-question-of-transition

https://szegounplugged.substack.com/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992091

File: 60c499a2cbecb2c⋯.jpg (167.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Jillian_Spencer_is_a_psych….jpg)

>>18940103

>>18945832

>>18992075

Senior child psychiatrist stood down after questioning gender medicine

NATASHA ROBINSON - JUNE 12, 2023

1/2

The suspension of a senior staff psychiatrist over her approach to transgender patients has thrown the Queensland Children’s Hospital into turmoil, casting a spotlight on widespread concerns among doctors at the treatment of children with gender dysphoria.

The case of Jillian Spencer – stood down from clinical duties apparently accused of transphobia – has exposed a culture in which clinicians are unable to employ medical discretion or a neutral therapeutic stance and are bound by their employment to affirm children’s gender transition.

Dr Spencer, a senior staff specialist in the QCH’s consultation liaison psychiatry team, was removed from clinical duties in mid-April following a patient complaint in an unusual response from a public hospital that followed months of conflict over affirmative gender medicine and trans identity politics within the hospital.

The case has prompted other doctors to raise concerns about the operation of the hospital’s gender clinic and the lack of co-ordination with its adolescent mental health service, the young age at which vulnerable patients with complex presentations are being prescribed cross-sex hormones, and the advocacy role of the gender clinic’s nurses who are running education sessions for public school nurses on chest binding.

Some staff members employed at the QCH have spoken of their concern at the way Dr Spencer’s case was being handled after the hospital drew upon its powers to compel staff under employment law to use children’s preferred pronouns, even though doing so was regarded by the Cass review as an active treatment measure as part of a social transition process that could lead to a cascade of medical interventions.

The hospital has also banned any discouragement of referrals to the gender clinic.

Some doctors at the hospital hold concerns that children are being prescribed hormone treatments after only two consultations at the Queensland Children’s Gender Service, with teenagers being approved for cross-sex hormones, which carry side-effects of sterility and loss of sexual function, sometimes at just 14 years old. This is despite the UK and several European countries adopting a more cautious approach to the prescription of such drugs amid concerns – also expressed by NSW’s Westmead gender clinic doctors – the evidence base was lacking.

The QCGS has 922 patients on its books and, according to FOI documents, prescribed cross-sex hormones to 102 adolescents in 2022 – more than twice as many as the Melbourne Children’s Hospital’s gender clinic. However, the true number of patients on hormones may be significantly greater as many are referred to private clinicians who prescribe to children under the care of QCGS.

Nurses employed by the gender service have been running “chest binder fitting sessions” for patients, as well as providing training to public school-based health nurses on chest binding.

The hospital not only actively pushes pronouns compliance by staff but also enters patients in the medical records as the gender they identify as, rather than their sex-based gender. Some doctors are opposed to this as it renders sex-based measures such as growth charts inaccurate among other medical implications.

QCH management did not respond to specific questions concerning all of these issues. A spokesperson for Children’s Health Queensland said: “The safety and wellbeing of children and young people in our care is always our highest priority.”

“All treatment and care provided by the Queensland Children’s Gender Service is guided by the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People (8th edition),” the spokesperson said. “In line with Children’s Health Queensland’s universal person-centred care approach, we respect the individual needs and preferences of every child … and their right to feel safe and supported while receiving clinical care through our services.”

The hospital operates on the basis that gender dysphoria results in serious mental health problems if not treated early and in accordance with internationally recognised practice.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992101

File: 62090780c4d95f4⋯.jpg (151.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Jillian_Spencer_is_a_psych….jpg)

>>18992091

2/2

Dr Spencer is prevented from speaking about her employment, but a number of Queensland medics aware of the circumstances of the psychiatrist’s case have spoken to The Weekend Australian.

The matter that led to Dr Spencer’s removal from clinical duties is understood to relate to an assessment she carried out in the hospital’s paediatrics ward of a mentally troubled 14-year-old who was under the care of the hospital’s gender clinic and had been taking puberty blockers.

Following the consultation, an apparent complaint of transphobia was levelled by the patient, and it was deemed by the hospital executive that Dr Spencer represented a risk to the safety of trans and gender-diverse children. Sources familiar with the matter said the psychiatrist has not been provided details of the complaint by the hospital.

“This is completely unusual,” said Dylan Wilson, a Queensland paediatrician informed of the situation. “This is not standard in terms of managing complaints.”

Dr Spencer is a signatory to the National Association of Practising Psychiatrists’ guide to managing gender dysphoria and incongruence in young people, which advocates a cautious approach and comprehensive mental health assessment. Her concerns about the lack of an evidence base underpinning gender-affirmative medicine and the prescription of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children were well-known within the hospital.

“Doctors in no way should be punished for expressing any concerns about a treatment pathway in any speciality in any form,” said NAPP’s president, psychiatrist Philip Morris.

“It would be completely outrageous if expressing concerns which are echoed by international organisations resulted in any form of disciplinary action.”

Children’s Health Queensland said it was, by law, unable to comment on employment matters but noted all employees were bound by public sector codes of conduct.

Dr Spencer has become so concerned at what she believes are the harms to children of the affirmative medicine model – which came under heavy scrutiny during a review in the UK by paediatrician Hilary Cass, who concluded there is a lack of evidence underpinning it – that she has appeared at women’s rights rallies and detailed her concerns at the “massive health risks” from hormone drugs and surgeries.

She told a recent rally in Canberra she was deeply concerned at the current culture in which “anyone’s child will be encouraged at school, online, during extra-curricular activities, by their friends and by health professionals to contemplate their gender”.

“Even little kids are being encouraged to contemplate their gender,” Dr Spencer said. “For some children this turns into an enduring preoccupation and they start to believe that the solution to any difficulties that they are facing lies in changing their bodies. From this point on the nightmare for families begins.

“Because they slowly come to realise that there is collusion going on between teachers, health professionals, child protection services and even the courts to ensure that all children are affirmed even if their parents disagree with that approach.

“Suddenly you’ll see what you never had cause to notice before: rainbow lanyards around the necks of health professionals and teachers, trans pride flags … in the waiting room at the health clinic, adults asking your child their preferred pronouns and using them … Wherever you try to move there is a professional there ready to trans your child.

“It will suddenly dawn on you (you) are not in with a chance to protect your child. These people you are relying on for help in the village it takes to raise a child are not actually interested in the long-term welfare of your child. They don’t suffer if your child becomes infertile or never experiences sexual pleasure or lives with debilitating side-effects from puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

“But they feel like really good people because they’re being inclusive.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/senior-child-psychiatrist-stood-down-after-questioning-gender-medicine/news-story/b418333aa19de951acb98601bf4ca31d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992119

File: 51de00b94b08392⋯.jpg (258.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_attends_the_w….jpg)

File: 2b769ffbb9ceb37⋯.jpg (227.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_min….jpg)

>>18928670

Yes campaign at odds with own director Noel Pearson

PAIGE TAYLOR - JUNE 12, 2023

The Indigenous voice to parliament’s best-resourced campaign, Yes23, has directly contradicted criticism from one of its own directors Noel Pearson that the campaign lacks a clear message.

Mr Pearson, one of 11 directors of Yes23 and its charitable arm Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition, has pointed to failings in the campaign he helped devise. Amid concern over recent polls showing a reduction in support for the voice, he suggested the campaign must do better to convey the key message that recognition is the aim and a voice is the way to get there.

“It’s a lack of clarity that is obviously working against us,” the veteran of the Indigenous rights movement told the Sydney Morning Herald.

“That is something we have to get over.”

The phrase “recognition through a voice” is ubiquitous in the Yes campaign.

Indigenous Australians minister Linda Burney, the Indigenous women of the Uluru Dialogues and Yes23 have been disciplined in emphasising each time they speak publicly about the voice that it is a means to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the constitution. Yes23’s first television advertisement focuses entirely on recognition, with no spoken reference to the voice. That campaign has been holding back as the Referendum Bill makes its way through both houses of parliament. Yes23 is expected to launch its campaign proper when the bill passes the senate this month.

On Monday, Danny Gilbert, the prominent lawyer who co-chairs Yes23 with screenwriter and filmmaker Rachel Perkins, was adamant the campaign was on track.

“As a board we have ongoing conversations about the message and the approach that will secure a positive result in the referendum,” Mr Gilbert told The Australian.

“Constitutional recognition is long overdue and the voice is the means sought and supported by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We are bouyed by the ever-growing coalition of supporters.

“As the campaign moves into a new phase we are fully confident that we are on the right path to bringing Australians together to deliver a resounding ‘yes’.”

Yes23 now has tens of millions of dollars in donations from the approximately 500 corporations and philanthropic organisations that support an Indigenous voice in the constitution. That tally, which the organisation has not announced, is rising almost daily. On Friday, Rio Tinto announced it would contribute $2 million.

The Australian has been told there is frustration inside the Yes campaign that its message has sometimes been crowded out of the pages of newspapers and lost in broadcast news reports about voice politics in Canberra. Campaigners are looking forward to July, when the Referendum Bill containing the voice question will have passed both houses of parliament. They believe that once this happens, the voice debate will be in the hands of the Australian people and what politicians say about it daily will be of less consequence and less relevance.

Mr Pearson’s own role in the campaign has also sometimes been a source of stress for the Yes camp. While grassroots campaigners for the voice have been travelling Australia - they have been talking and answering questions in cities, regional centres and remote towns - Mr Pearson’s public denigration of those who do not agree with him has grabbed headlines and served as a distraction. He lashed the amiable Indigenous leader Mick Gooda for suggesting more compromise might be necessary to achieve a successful referendum, calling him “little Micky Gooda” and a bedwetter.

The question Australians will be asked at the referendum – likely in October – describes the voice as the means of recognition. It states: “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/noel-pearson-highlights-failings-of-own-indigenous-voice-campaign/news-story/4228fc7bfae0da63a6b5edbce9d83ffc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992132

File: 90d6ca8e57cf123⋯.jpg (1.89 MB,5472x3648,3:2,Noel_Pearson_delivers_a_sp….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992119

Yes campaign ‘snookered’, says Noel Pearson in call for major campaign shift

Paul Sakkal and Lisa Visentin - June 12, 2023

1/2

Leading Voice architect Noel Pearson is pushing for a fundamental shift in how the Voice to parliament referendum is being presented, warning the Yes movement lacks a clear message and has been snookered by deceptive arguments of its opponents.

In a significant intervention months out from a tightly contested referendum, the academic and activist also said there was an urgent need to elevate the goal of recognising Indigenous Australians in the Constitution above the creation of the Voice advisory body.

Much of the debate about the referendum has centred on the proposed Voice, but Pearson declared the Yes campaign must shift its attention to explaining the need to recognise First Nations people in Australia’s founding document and moving towards reconciliation, which he feared would be doomed in the long term if the referendum failed.

“I think that message has got to be even more prominent than the Voice. The Voice is just the means; the core of the reform is recognition,” he said in an interview, “and our argument is that the Voice is the best means.”

“Give our people a Voice to the parliament, to the government, and you will give us the best means of recognition. But the main point here is that we achieve recognition. That was the original motivation. When John Howard kicked the ball off in 2007, it was about recognition.”

Pearson said highlighting recognition would be a “fundamental refocus that brings clarity to our campaign and our cause”.

“It’s a lack of clarity that is obviously working against us,” he said. “That is something we have to get over.”

Expressing optimism that the Yes campaign could overcome what he described as inevitable messiness caused by months of political debate, Pearson admitted his movement’s messaging had been cluttered.

“I think that’s a challenge we face at this stage of the campaign: we don’t have a clear message.”

Pearson, who is a director of the Yes23 organisation, also acknowledged he had erred in engaging in multiple verbal stoushes this year, saying the movement’s most valuable asset was its unifying essence and “people like me need to realise we can’t be drawn by our opponents into obscuring that promise.”

“I think that’s a mistake I personally made … some of the fights and the frustrations about that and so on. Our strongest suit is unity for the country.”

The Senate will begin debating the bill to set up the referendum this week. After this final stage of the political process – which has coincided with a substantial drop in public polling support for the Voice – Pearson and the Yes movement hope to sharpen its communication and build its on-the-ground infrastructure.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992135

File: 8ec0555a827c47d⋯.jpg (3.1 MB,7125x4750,3:2,Jacinta_Price_and_Oppositi….jpg)

>>18992132

2/2

Pearson’s preferred campaign approach could cause discomfort in sections of the Yes camp. Voice-supporting Labor cabinet ministers last month told this masthead that downplaying the Voice could play into the No campaign’s hands after Yes23’s first major advertisement emphasised constitutional recognition and only referenced the Voice in a hashtag at the end of the video. Leading No campaigner, Country Liberal Party senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, attacked the ad as “deceptive”.

Australians will be asked at a referendum between October and December whether they support a Voice advisory body being established “in recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia”.

Pearson, the Cape York Institute leader, said focusing on recognition – support for which has traditionally been strong across the political spectrum – would help the Yes campaign to overcome the rhetorical challenges it faced fighting its opponents, whom Pearson said had “snookered” Voice backers.

By painting Yes figures as divisive and driven by race-based interests, Pearson said, his allies were wary of engaging in debates on these topics lest they went some way to proving the original charge.

“[They] accuse the Yes campaign of going out and saying, you know, you’re racist if you don’t vote for this, even though they can’t point to any instance of it,” he said.

“In fact, there’s hardly any Yes voices compared to them and it has just resulted in the fact that they’re completely free to talk about racism and the Yes campaign is completely snookered from calling it out.”

In a boost to Voice supporters, the Yes campaign will announce on Monday that more than 500 community organisations – including environmental groups, faith and multicultural organisations, land councils, businesses, universities, sporting clubs and unions – had pledged support for the Voice.

Addressing the lack of recognition of Indigenous people in the Constitution was the overriding purpose of this year’s referendum, Pearson argued, adding that once the referendum bill was signed off by parliament, “the clarity of our proposition will be allowed to shine through.”

“This isn’t ever going away. Do we do it in 2050, maybe? Or do we do it in 2100? So yes, recognition is the most core and fundamental argument. But it’s a core and fundamental argument because it is what is wrong with the country; it is the key thing that is wrong with Australia.

“The onus will fall on us to have a very clear message for the Australian people after this legislation passes the Senate. No more excuse after that. After that, we will need a very clear message to the Australian people about what this is all about and why it is important for all Australians.

“The coherence of the campaign is going to be extremely important. Over the next six months, we need discipline, and we need a single message coming from the Yes side of the campaign. We’re now at a stage where we’re ready.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/yes-campaign-snookered-says-noel-pearson-in-call-for-major-campaign-shift-20230611-p5dfnc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992142

File: a9f34f8657a1814⋯.jpg (591.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Descendants_and_original_c….jpg)

>>18992132

Indigenous voice to parliament can complete the unfinished business of the 1967 referendum

GEORGE WILLIAMS - JUNE 12, 2023

1/2

Australians last voted in a referendum to improve the lives of Indigenous peoples in 1967. That poll erased racially discriminatory wording from the Constitution and enabled the commonwealth to make laws for Aboriginal peoples.

The 1967 referendum was not only Australia’s most important referendum since Federation, it was also the most successful. The proposal swept the nation, winning every state and achieving a national Yes vote of 90.77 per cent.

There are lessons from 1967 for the voice referendum, starting with their similarities. Both votes concern inclusion and recognition for Indigenous peoples. Both also arrived at the ballot box after a lengthy period of grassroots activism.

The 1967 referendum emerged after decades of agitation for constitutional change to recognise the basic humanity of the nation’s first peoples. The voice proposal has its roots in the recognition movement of the late 1990s before being called for in the Uluru Statement from the Heart in 2017.

There are also significant differences that explain why the voice is on a different trajectory. The 1967 referendum was backed by a community and political consensus that law reform was essential to achieve justice for Aboriginal peoples. The ban on Aboriginal people voting in federal elections put in place in 1902 had been removed in 1962. A sense had also emerged that national laws were needed to protect the interests of Aboriginal people. The Constitution was obviously discriminatory and out of step with Australian values. It needed to be changed.

The changes made in 1967 were technical and narrow, and provided no recognition to Indigenous peoples. Section 51(xxvi) had empowered the federal parliament to make laws with respect to: “The people of any race, other than the Aboriginal race in any state, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws.” The 1967 referendum deleted the words in italics. It also repealed section 127, which provided: “In reckoning the numbers of the people of the commonwealth, or of a state or other part of the commonwealth, Aboriginal natives shall not be counted.”

The 1967 campaign focused upon emotion and values, with little examination of the changes or on lawyers’ interpretations of their effect. Instead, people spoke of how the referendum would achieve equal rights and citizenship for Indigenous peoples and ensure our nation’s founding document treated them as human beings. The imagery of the campaign told a similar story, with one front-page newspaper photo summing up the mood in showing two children, one Aboriginal and one white, gazing happily at each other as they walked down a laneway hand in hand.

Every major political party and leading community figures supported the change. The unique national moment was reflected in the fact that no one in parliament voted against the proposal and as a result there was not an official No case. Letters to the newspapers ran almost unequivocally in support. Where there was misinformation, it was not amplified by politicians, nor by the media.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992147

File: e6aa63bae81c6ef⋯.jpg (138.65 KB,1024x769,1024:769,A_campaign_poster_for_the_….jpg)

>>18992142

2/2

Another positive break for the Yes case was that a second referendum question was put to Australians on the same day. The government also sought to break the “nexus” between the House of Representatives and the Senate that requires the House to be, as near as practicable, twice the size of the Senate. Prime minister Harold Holt, supported by opposition leader Gough Whitlam, wanted to do away with this so the House could be increased without a corresponding change in the Senate.

This second proposal attracted the lion’s share of the political debate, and almost all of the disagreement. Even though it had bipartisan support, it was opposed with great effect by a small group of senators. They proved to be brutally effective in prosecuting the No case by arguing the change was an attack on the Senate and could produce an explosion in the number of lower house members. Their cry of “no more politicians” succeeded, with the Yes case on the nexus proposal winning only one state and a national vote of 40.25 per cent.

Media coverage the day after the referendum focused on the nexus proposal. Holt was bitter about his loss and, rather than labelling May 27 as a win for Aboriginal Australians, described the outcome as a “victory for prejudice and misrepresentation”. He blamed Australians who “chose to ignore the advice of those to whom they normally look for guidance”.

Australians have come to see the true significance of the 1967 referendum. The unprecedented Yes vote for the Indigenous proposal provided a mandate for national laws and policy on Aboriginal affairs. What was missing was positive acknowledgment in the Constitution and a means for first peoples to have a say on the laws and policies that could now be made for them.

The task of the 2023 referendum is to remedy this unfinished business by providing recognition and a voice to Australia’s first peoples.

George Williams is a deputy vice-chancellor and Professor of Law at the University of New South Wales.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-can-complete-the-unfinished-business-of-the-1967-referendum/news-story/bebc8d28236201af478121dbce2c67d1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992160

File: d271b48ed184475⋯.jpg (217.35 KB,1023x797,1023:797,Vote_over_time.jpg)

File: aa6bfe092d1def5⋯.jpg (206.9 KB,1030x1197,1030:1197,Yes_vote_by_state.jpg)

>>18775344 (pb)

>>18860464 (pb)

>>18928670

‘A tipping point’: Support for Voice falls below a majority

David Crowe - June 12, 2023

1/2

Support for the Indigenous Voice has fallen below a majority on the Yes or No question that will decide the referendum, dropping from 53 to 49 per cent ahead of a crucial Senate decision on the wording of the change to the constitution.

Voters have swung against the proposal for the third month in a row and are backing the No case in three states – Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia – when asked about the federal government’s proposed question.

An exclusive survey shows that support for the Voice is at 56 per cent in Victoria and 53 per cent in NSW but this is outweighed by powerful swings that could block the reform gaining the required threshold of a majority of votes in a majority of states.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has rejected calls to amend the Voice proposal before the Senate votes on the wording of the question in the referendum bill this fortnight, cementing the plan for a public vote later this year.

The survey, conducted for this masthead by Resolve Strategic, shows that 42 per cent of voters support the Voice and 40 per cent oppose it when asked about the government proposal for change, with another 18 per cent undecided.

When asked a second question that only allows a Yes or No answer akin to the referendum, and using the exact wording put forward by the government, 49 per cent support the change but 51 per cent are opposed.

The Resolve survey is the first major poll to show No has a majority and the first to show three states have shifted to the No side.

Resolve director Jim Reed said the debate had reached a “tipping point” where advocates for the change were failing to gain a national majority and could not gain a majority of states.

“The No voters report being more committed in their choice than the Yes voters,” he said.

“This tells us that those people who have moved to No are locking in behind that choice, whereas the remaining Yes voters are wavering.

“Almost all voters have now heard of the Voice, but only 30 per cent say they could confidently explain it to someone else. This suggests that the more people hear about the Voice the more they are voting No, and not understanding the detail is likely a part of that.”

“The Yes vote has gone from 58 to 49 per cent over three months, so when we combine the survey tracks to break the results down by state it’s actually understating where the No position is now,” said Reed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992165

File: ba218cecae0c15a⋯.jpg (300.87 KB,1050x892,525:446,Vote_for_Constitutional_In….jpg)

>>18992160

2/2

The objections are strongest in Queensland, with only 44 per cent of voters in favour of the Voice, followed by South Australia (48 per cent support) and Western Australia (49 per cent support).

The Voice has majority support in Tasmania, seen by campaigners on both sides as pivotal because its small population has a big impact on the result, with 57 per cent of voters in favour, but this is based on a small sample size that Reed said should be treated with caution.

While Albanese and federal cabinet ministers have declared their confidence in winning the vote, the new survey shows support for the Voice among Labor voters has fallen from 75 per cent in April to 69 per cent in May and 63 per cent in June.

Support has been stable among Greens voters, with 81 per cent in favour in June, but has fallen among Coalition voters from 30 per cent in April to 27 per cent in May and 26 per cent in the latest survey. This means 74 per cent of Coalition voters are now on the No side.

The Resolve Political Monitor surveyed 1606 eligible voters about the wording proposed by the government in the referendum bill currently before parliament to change the Constitution to recognise First Australians by establishing the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.

The results have a margin of error of 2.4 percentage points, which is greater than the margin between the 51 per cent support for No and the 49 per cent support for Yes, highlighting the tightness of the political race toward the referendum in October or November.

While the national figures reported here come from the survey work last week, the state-by-state results are drawn from two surveys in May and June in order to gain a higher sample size for the major states. The questions were identical in the two surveys.

The state figures are based on questions to 3216 voters including 1008 in NSW and 1006 in Victoria, along with smaller groups in smaller states. The margin of error is greater in the state results, highlighting the uncertainty about the outcome when Yes campaigners express confidence in winning the referendum.

The national result when the May and June surveys are combined is 51 per cent support for the Voice, but this reflects the higher support one month ago because the figure is the average of the two tracks.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/a-tipping-point-support-for-voice-falls-below-a-majority-20230612-p5dfto.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18992177

File: 22efa8d73b8f6a1⋯.jpg (162.01 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Anthony_Albanese_left_may_….jpg)

File: d271b48ed184475⋯.jpg (217.35 KB,1023x797,1023:797,Vote_over_time.jpg)

File: aa6bfe092d1def5⋯.jpg (206.9 KB,1030x1197,1030:1197,Yes_vote_by_state.jpg)

File: ba218cecae0c15a⋯.jpg (300.87 KB,1050x892,525:446,Vote_for_Constitutional_In….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992132

>>18992160

Is Anthony Albanese facing a tipping point on the Voice referendum?

David Crowe - June 12, 2023

Anthony Albanese is about to reach the point of no return on the Indigenous Voice with an apparent confidence that Australians will back his preferred model for the contentious change.

But the latest Resolve Political Monitor highlights the grave danger of defeat – and a generational setback for reconciliation – unless the prime minister and the Yes campaigners take drastic action to save their cause.

The options are to reset the campaign, redraft the proposal or reschedule the vote.

One of the authors of the Voice, Noel Pearson, admits the need to change the campaign. He wants a “refocus” that brings clarity to the argument. This suggests a reset, but it is not clear if the Yes campaigners can agree on what to do. Should they talk more about the recognition of First Australians or tell voters more about how the Voice would work and what problems it would solve?

The even harder decision is to redraft the proposal. Albanese has rejected the call from Liberal MP and Yes supporter Julian Leeser to simplify the change by deleting a disputed section about executive government. This would not be enough to win over Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and his party room, but that was never the point. The change might, in theory, allay concerns in parts of the community.

That leaves the option of rescheduling the vote. Albanese has vowed to hold the referendum later this year, but the Yes campaign clearly needs more time. One of the likely referendum dates, October 14, is just four months away. The question for the government is whether it should hold the vote next year – a move that would look desperate but might be necessary.

Nobody can pretend the campaign for change is running smoothly. The Resolve survey is the first to show state-by-state results based on several months of data with the same questions put to thousands of voters since April, after the government finalised its wording (earlier surveys used slightly different wording).

The results are close because 51 per cent say they will vote No and the margin of error is 2.4 per cent, but the trend is unrelentingly negative for Albanese and the Yes campaigners. Labor voters are shifting against the proposal. The results from Newspoll, Essential and other public polls show the same trend.

Peter Dutton, who has little popular support as opposition leader, now has the majority with him on the Voice. Albanese, who has stratospheric approval levels, discovers that his powers of persuasion are not as great as he thought. Meanwhile, there is no chief advocate for Yes other than the prime minister. This is a disturbing failure for Yes campaigners when they have more money, more endorsements and more media support than their opponents.

One reaction will be for advocates to dispute the polls. But the Resolve Political Monitor tells respondents the proposed change to the Constitution is the exact wording set out by the government in the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) Bill before asking them their views. The first question gives voters the option to be undecided and the second allows only a “yes or no” response akin to the referendum.

This means respondents are presented with the full wording of the change to the Constitution, including the recognition of First Australians, the reference to executive government and the power of the parliament to make laws regarding the Voice.

In the first question and the “yes or no” question, the Resolve Political Monitor gives respondents the proposed referendum question in full: “A proposed law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposal alteration?”

The angry political argument has turned voters away by highlighting division among Indigenous leaders, deepening concerns about the impact on executive government or fuelling anxiety about the country being divided by race.

Misinformation is rife and the efforts of the Australian Electoral Commission may not be enough to stop the false claims – such as arguments that overlook the fact that the Constitution already includes a race power.

Defeat for the proposed establishment of an advisory body means a lasting setback for reconciliation, just as Pearson warned in January. He and other Indigenous leaders have some hard decisions to make about how to save their cause.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/is-anthony-albanese-facing-a-tipping-point-on-the-voice-referendum-20230612-p5dftt.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998235

File: b6b304e58ad7566⋯.jpg (94.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Noel_Pearson_attends_the_w….jpg)

File: b3866ef9fc8ebfe⋯.jpg (171.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pat_Dodson_L_with_Mark_Lei….jpg)

File: 46e31d10b9d7ee8⋯.jpg (105.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_min….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992119

Indigenous voice to parliament yes campaigners told to stick to positive message

PAIGE TAYLOR - JUNE 13, 2023

1/2

The campaign for the Indigenous voice to parliament must spend less time countering the lies of the No campaign and more time on its own hopeful and positive message, according to Referendum Council co-chair Mark Leibler.

Mr Leibler, who recommended a voice referendum as co-author of the final report of the Referendum Council in 2017, told The Australian on Monday: “There is too much emphasis on the voice and not enough emphasis on the voice being the chosen form of recognition.”

He made his remarks after Cape York leader Noel Pearson described the Yes campaign he helped devise as having “a lack of clarity that is really working against us”. Mr Pearson, a board member of Yes23, told the Sydney Morning Herald the Yes campaign must do more to make it clear recognising Indigenous people in the Constitution is the aim and the voice is the means to do it.

Mr Leibler shares this view because, after a lengthy and thorough process by the Referendum Council including a National Constitutional Convention at Uluru in 2017, it emerged that a voice was the only form of constitutional recognition acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Mr Leibler said polling showed this remained the case for more than 86 per cent of Indigenous Australians.

“Noel is correctly making the point that the emphasis needs to be on recognition,” Mr Leibler said.

“The reason why the wrong emphasis is being put on it is because I think the Yes case has been, to some extent, cornered by some of the disinformation … it is a pitfall that needs to be avoided.

“If there is disinformation then it needs to be rebutted but I think what the campaign needs to do is less of the rebuttal and more of the positive message.”

How to deal with misinformation has become a serious challenge for Yes campaigners and the Albanese government. Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has grown concerned about wild theories online but does not wish to give them a platform. She is putting strict limits on what she responds to.”

The Australian has been told Ms Burney will instead speak as often as she can about the potential for the voice to help governments make practical change.

This could involve reforming work-for-the-dole or building more houses on homelands where overcrowding is worst.

Yes23 has been holding back until after the Senate passes the Referendum Bill containing the question Australians will be asked this year. So far, it has released one advertisement about the fairness of recognising Indigenous people in the Constitution. That advertisement contains no spoken reference to the voice.

“Recognition through a voice” is a phrase ubiquitous in the Yes campaign. This is an accurate summary of what more than 1200 Indigenous people asked for in the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart. It is also central to the strategy Yes23 has embraced on advice from revered political strategist and Yes23 board member Mark Textor.

The emphasis on recognition allows Yes campaigners to evoke John Howard, an appealing figure to so many conservative Australians, because Mr Howard pledged in 2007 to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Constitution. He did this after a crucial meeting with land rights giant Yunupingu but was unable to proceed because he lost the 2007 election.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998236

File: a7a8875860673bf⋯.jpg (88.27 KB,768x1024,3:4,Danny_Gilbert.jpg)

File: c70c32c00f1dba9⋯.jpg (135.63 KB,768x1024,3:4,Rachel_Perkins.jpg)

>>18998235

2/2

Mr Leibler said the focus on the structure and functions of the proposed advisory body was a furphy, since every element of the voice would be decided by parliament and changed as needed.

“Everyone says they favour constitutional recognition,” he added.

“Well, if you favour constitutional recognition the only way of expressing that is through the voice because that is what Indigenous people asked for. You can’t recognise people in a way that is not acceptable to them.

“The critical thing here is that everything concerning the voice will be determined by the parliament.

“It is disingenuous to say people shouldn’t support the voice because ‘we don’t have the detail’ but the detail is not something that will be determined by the referendum. The only thing the referendum will determine is the voice’s existence. Almost every element of the voice will be settled by the parliament and parliament can change the way the voice operates at any time.”

On Monday, Danny Gilbert, the prominent lawyer who co-chairs Yes23 with screenwriter and filmmaker Rachel Perkins, described the campaign as being on the right path.

“As a board we have ongoing conversations about the message and the approach that will secure a positive result in the referendum,” Mr Gilbert said.

“Constitutional recognition is long overdue and the voice is the means sought and supported by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We are buoyed by the ever-growing coalition of supporters. As the campaign moves into a new phase we are fully confident that we are on the right path to bringing Australians together to deliver a resounding ‘yes’.

Yes23 has tens of millions of dollars in donations from the approximately 500 corporations and philanthropic organisations that support an Indigenous voice in the Constitution. On Friday, Rio Tinto announced it would contribute $2m.

The Australian has been told there is frustration inside the Yes campaign that its message has sometimes been crowded out of the pages of newspapers and lost in broadcast news reports about voice politics in Canberra. Campaigners are looking forward to July, when the Referendum Bill containing the voice question will have passed both houses of parliament. They believe once this happens, the debate will be in the hands of the people and what politicians say daily will be of less consequence and less relevance.

Mr Pearson’s own role in the campaign has also sometimes been a source of stress for the Yes camp. While grassroots campaigners for the voice have been travelling Australia, talking and answering questions in cities, regional centres and remote towns, Mr Pearson’s public denigration of those who do not agree with him has grabbed headlines and served as a distraction.

Mr Pearson acknowledged this was a mistake, telling the Herald that unity for the country was the Yes campaign’s strongest suit.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/noel-pearson-highlights-failings-of-own-indigenous-voice-campaign/news-story/4228fc7bfae0da63a6b5edbce9d83ffc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998240

File: d6257a7b9ea82f9⋯.jpg (76.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Darkinjung_Aboriginal_Land….jpg)

File: c1a7155e0ac7ce8⋯.jpg (99.33 KB,768x1024,3:4,Julian_Leeser.jpg)

File: cae483c02ac483b⋯.jpg (113.41 KB,768x1023,256:341,Ken_Wyatt.jpg)

File: 3833a5cdec5dc23⋯.jpg (72.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,Kate_Carnell.jpg)

>>18928670

>>18949840

Conservative think-tank chairman Sean Gordon to co-lead Liberals for Yes campaign

SARAH ISON - JUNE 12, 2023

Referendum working group member and chairman of the conservative think-tank Uphold and Recognise, Sean Gordon, will lead the Liberals for Yes campaign alongside former ACT chief minister Kate Carnell, ahead of the referendum on the Indigenous voice to parliament.

The Liberals for Yes, which include federal opposition backbenchers Julian Leeser and Bridget Archer, officially launched their campaign advocating for the voice earlier this month, arguing the meaningful recognition of Indigenous Australians through a voice to parliament would deliver “practical policy and practical outcomes”.

The Australian can reveal Uphold and Recognise, which was founded by Mr Leeser and whose board members include former Indigenous Australians minister Ken Wyatt, will formally join the Liberals for Yes this week.

It follows a hardening of the No campaigns – whose key figures include Country-Liberal Party senator Jacinta Price and former MP Warren Mundine – which claim the voice will divide Australia on the basis of race and create legal risks by enshrining the body in the constitution.

Newspoll last week revealed only 46 per cent of voters approve of ­altering the constitution to give effect to an Indigenous voice as proposed by the federal government.

Mr Gordon, who will serve as joint national convener of Liberals for Yes alongside Ms Carnell, said joining the campaign was the “natural next step” for his organisation.

“Our purpose has been to advocate for constitutional recognition in a way that can support practical outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people,” he said.

“The question of constitutional recognition will shortly be out of the parliament and placed in the hands of the Australian people. We want those who have been on the journey with Uphold and Recognise to take this final step with us, and support the Yes vote.”

Mr Gordon – who has been appointed a Member of the Order of Australia this week for his service and advocacy in Indigenous affairs – is one of many pro-Yes campaigners who has expressed concern over the inclusion of “executive government” in the wording of the constitutional amendment and told The Australian last month he believed the outcome of the parliamentary inquiry examining the wording was “poor”. He said the tabling of “a single recommendation” by the Labor-dominated committee to pass the amendment with no changes was “very inconsiderate” of those who had urged for the wording to be tweaked to limit the voice’s power to advise executive government.

The prominent Indigenous businessman also raised the concerns over the wording within the government’s referendum working group, but was ultimately outnumbered in the view executive government should remain in the amendment. Despite any lingering reservations, Mr Gordon said he would focus completely on campaigning for a Yes vote at the referendum, due between October and December.

“We now have clarity on the constitutional amendment that will recognise Indigenous Australians by creating a voice, whose functions and powers can be defined and adjusted by the parliament as appropriate,” he said.

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson said earlier this month it was important that executive government remain “in the scope” of the voice, but noted there had been last-minute changes to limit this power.

“There was a tweak done by Albanese and my Indigenous colleagues, they tweaked the provision just before it was tabled in the parliament to make it very clear that parliament can legislate to define how the advice is provided to the executive,” he told Sky News.

Ms Carnell welcomed Uphold and Recognise being part of the Liberals for Yes campaign, given the organisation had been “a key driving force in Liberal circles and at the national level for constitutional recognition” for more than a decade.

“I am pleased to be working with Sean Gordon to encourage Liberals, Liberal voters and Liberal-minded people to encourage a resounding Yes vote when Australians vote later this year,” she said. “Constitutional recognition through a voice is a cause that brings Australians together and alongside Sean and the Uphold and Recognise team we will be working to make that happen.”

The constitutional amendment is set to pass parliament in the coming fortnight.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/conservative-thinktank-chairman-sean-gordon-to-colead-liberals-for-yes-campaign/news-story/e2e6073b7c71ca1d69ff05cc8f635ebf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998246

File: 5a92e6658f9b849⋯.jpg (124.71 KB,1021x680,1021:680,Burney_with_Indigenous_lea….jpg)

File: 534c174a2fd1691⋯.jpg (130.51 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: a035a2dae972bda⋯.jpg (92.38 KB,620x930,2:3,Yes23_director_Dean_Parkin….jpg)

>>18928670

Voice opponents turn to ‘Trump-like’ politics, misinformation: Burney

Paul Sakkal - June 13, 2023

Campaigners against the Indigenous Voice referendum are copying Donald Trump by weaponising misinformation, Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney has declared, as Voice backers implore Australians to keep faith in the reconciliation push.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has spent months attacking the Voice and reacted to polling in this masthead, showing the No side ahead for the first time, by urging Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to walk back the ambition of the referendum and cut out the Voice body to focus on the simpler proposal of recognising Indigenous people in the Constitution.

As the Liberal Party and former prime minister John Howard launched a fundraising drive to defeat the referendum, top Indigenous leaders expressed optimism it would succeed as debate moved “out of the Canberra bubble and into backyards” following next week’s passing of referendum legislation.

“Keep the faith. History is calling,” said leading Voice architects Megan Davis and Pat Anderson, asserting support was solid among voters spoken to in dozens of Uluru Dialogues events.

Albanese echoed their hopefulness, telling Labor MPs he remained confident about the referendum, due to be held between October and December, to which he has staked his authority.

Burney used a speech in Canberra on Tuesday night to claim the Voice would lead to tangible improvements in society and a “more productive Australia, with greater social and economic participation”, while highlighting the No campaign’s “post-truth approach to politics”.

“I fear that the No campaign is importing American-style Trump politics to Australia,” she said. “Its aim is to polarise people and its weapon of choice is misinformation.”

“No campaign outfit, Fair Australia, regularly posts things on social media that are clearly false or taken out of context.”

Citing examples of the No grouping misleadingly suggesting former prime minister Bob Hawke opposed constitutional recognition and wrongly claiming the grandson of Indigenous leader Vincent Lingiari opposed the Voice, Burney positioned the Voice as a positive and practical solution.

“The Yes campaign is articulating a positive vision of Australia’s future … the Australian people are better than Trump politics from the No campaign,” she said.

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin pointed to polling by research firm Essential showing 60-40 support for the Voice that contradicts polling by other firms showing a much tighter contest.

“The conversation has been really caught up in the Canberra bubble with politicians and lawyers having their say. Now thankfully that process is almost due to end,” he said on Sky News.

Marcus Stewart, another prominent Voice campaigner, said: “Ultimately the polls that we see on the news are at a disconnect to the conversations that I’m seeing on the ground”.

Speaking to Coalition MPs at a party room meeting, Dutton said Labor should perform a U-turn on its referendum proposal because a Resolve Strategic poll – showing the No side ahead at 51-49 – showed “the best case is that the Voice gets up by a slim majority and that the country is divided”.

“Labor have rejected all chances and all suggestions to give the referendum its best chance of success,” he said, according to a spokesperson for the opposition who detailed Dutton’s private comments.

“There is an opportunity now for the prime minister to unify the country and that’s through constitutional recognition without a constitutionally enshrined Voice, and we will work with the prime minister to do this.”

In Senate debate on the referendum bill on Tuesday, Greens Indigenous affairs spokeswoman Dorinda Cox urged Australians to get to know Aboriginal people before voting in the referendum and said the 11 Indigenous federal MPs were insufficient to help close the gap. “We have different views, we come from different parties and different parts of this beautiful country,” she said.

Shadow attorney-general Michaelia Cash said in the same debate that the Voice would cause the nation to be “irreparably damaged forever”.

Dutton’s party machine launched a campaign on Tuesday to garner donations supporting the Liberal Party’s campaign against the Voice.

Party supporters received an email signed off by former prime minister John Howard, warning about the way in which the Voice could change the way government works.

“The Liberal team will highlight these risks to everyday Australians,” it said. “However, making these arguments in the face of political, corporate and celebrity support for the Yes campaign will be a challenge.”

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/voice-opponents-turn-to-trump-like-politics-misinformation-burney-20230613-p5dg5u.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998265

File: a4d95d158c93088⋯.jpg (88.58 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_minister_for_Indigenou….jpg)

File: b481567daf4cc42⋯.jpg (287.29 KB,1170x1114,585:557,Support_for_Voice_to_Parli….jpg)

File: c7369d4026b0e25⋯.jpg (223.81 KB,1170x964,585:482,Reasons_against_the_Voice_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18955149

>>18992160

Australians’ support for Indigenous voice steady with 60% in favour, Essential poll finds

Guardian Essential poll finds high level of backing for voice to parliament, despite other polls showing support flagging

Josh Butler and Paul Karp - 13 Jun 2023

1/2

Public support for the Indigenous voice to parliament is holding steady and remains high, the latest Guardian Essential poll shows, in contrast with other recent polls suggesting support is sliding.

The poll of 1,123 voters, published on Tuesday, found 60% of respondents were in favour of the voice, up one point on the previous survey, while 40% were opposed to it.

The yes vote still leads in all major opinion polls, but voice supporters and senior Labor government figures have raised concerns about the vigour of the yes campaign as the no campaign grows in volume.

A Resolve poll for the Nine newspapers, published on Monday, showed 42% in favour and 40% against with 18% undecided – but when forced to make a yes or no decision only 49% supported the change while 51% opposed it. Last week’s Newspoll showed 46% support, 43% against and 11% undecided.

The psephologist Kevin Bonham calculates average support to be in the mid-50s, after Resolve and Newspoll recorded the biggest declines for the yes vote. But the Essential poll is more optimistic for the voice, with support steady at 59% or 60% in the past four polls.

In the latest poll, voters who opposed the voice were given four potential reasons for why they did so. About 34% said it would “divide Australians”, 33% said “it will give Indigenous Australians rights and privileges that other Australians don’t have”, 26% said “it won’t make a real difference to the lives of ordinary Indigenous Australians” and 7% said “Indigenous Australians don’t agree on it”.

Most respondents were unfamiliar with the Uluru statement from the heart, which called for Indigenous recognition in the constitution through a voice to parliament. Only 12% said they “heard someone read it out, or read it myself” and a further 21% said “I haven’t read it but know what’s in it”. About 36% said “I’ve heard of it but don’t know what’s in it” and 31% had not heard of the Uluru statement.

The Indigenous leader Noel Pearson, a key architect of the voice, has warned that the yes campaign has “a lack of clarity” and called for supporters to focus on the constitutional recognition element of the proposal rather than the voice itself.

The yes campaign is gearing up for a fresh advertising blitz and will roll out a series of nationwide public events in July as it moves to shift attention away from the parliamentary arena. Yes23 campaign leaders believe support will rise quickly once the voice debate shifts beyond Canberra, as federal parliament moves towards passing the referendum legislation bill.

Meanwhile, the Uphold & Recognise group, co-founded by the Liberal MP Julian Leeser, on Monday said it would share staff and resources with the newly formed Liberals For Yes group to campaign for the voice.

On the no side, the conservative lobby group Advance, led by the Nationals senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, will soon launch the next stage of its “Fair Australia” campaign against the voice, with a spokesperson saying it would continue to criticise the voice as divisive.

“We will focus our resources on innovative, targeted and effective ways of reaching Australians who are open to hearing the side of the story the yes campaign would rather keep hidden,” they said in a statement.

“In some cases, this will be through TV and digital advertising, in other cases through other campaign tactics such as high-impact, high-visibility field activity.”

The no campaign will focus on smaller states Tasmania, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998271

File: 4b35bbf8b436696⋯.jpg (303.57 KB,1170x1114,585:557,Voice_to_Parliament_Voter_….jpg)

File: 689e31f24d7a5bb⋯.jpg (192.79 KB,1170x801,130:89,Awareness_of_the_Uluru_Sta….jpg)

>>18998265

2/2

Albanese’s role in focus

Amid growing scrutiny on the campaigns, the role of Anthony Albanese in the yes push is of major interest. There are expectations the prime minister may announce the referendum date, tipped as 14 October, at Arnhem Land’s Garma festival in August.

But government sources suggested Albanese would not seek to make himself the referendum figurehead so as to stress the voice was not an invention of politicians, but instead an idea sprouted from grassroots consultation with Indigenous communities. Government sources said it couldn’t be “Labor’s campaign”.

The Liberal party has taken to describing it as “Labor’s voice” or “Anthony Albanese’s voice”.

The government is also mindful that a sustained major focus on the referendum could be met with claims that Albanese is not focused on issues such as the cost of living or inflation.

The Indigenous Australians minister, Linda Burney, has been busy travelling to promote the voice, which was a Labor election pledge. Burney last month said she had “absolute faith in” the yes campaign.

The Senate will this week continue debating the constitutional alteration bill to set up the referendum, with an aim for it pass by mid next week after dozens of speeches.

To be successful the referendum will require a national majority plus a majority of at least four out of six states.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jun/13/australians-support-for-indigenous-voice-steady-with-60-in-favour-essential-poll-finds

https://essentialreport.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998319

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18928680

>>18954987

'Those are the facts': Katy Gallagher denies misleading parliament over Brittany Higgins' allegations

Daniel Jeffrey - Jun 13, 2023

Katy Gallagher has once again denied misleading parliament over her knowledge of Brittany Higgins' rape allegations, while the Australian Federal Police is assesing a complaint over the leaking of text messages in the matter.

In a statement to the Senate, the federal finance minister repeated her assertion that, while she knew about Higgins' rape allegations before they became public, she had not misled parliament by telling an estimates committee three years ago that "no one had any knowledge" of the matter.

"At Senate estimates on June 4 2021, the then-minister for defence, Senator (Linda) Reynolds, said, 'I know where this started'," Gallagher said.

"She went on to say, 'I was told by one of your senators two weeks before about what you were intending to do with the story in my office'.

"Two weeks before.

"I was shocked at the assertion made by Senator Reynolds, with the clear implication that I was responsible or had some involvement with making that story public.

"That was not true. It was never true. And I responded to that allegation by saying no one had any knowledge."

Gallagher also said she had explained her prior knowledge of the allegations to Reynolds in a private meeting two years ago, which Reynolds accepted.

Gallagher had revealed on Saturday that she did know about Higgins' allegations but insisted she had never misled parliament over the matter.

Reynolds is the minister in whose office Higgins claimed she was raped by then-Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann.

Lehrmann, who has always maintained his innocence, was charged over the allegations. His first trial was aborted without a finding due to juror misconduct, while a second was abandoned by prosecutors over concerns for Higgins' health.

A few hours after Gallagher's statement, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus confirmed in Question Time that a complaint has been made to the AFP over the leaking of texts from the Lehrmann trial.

"I am deeply concerned about the apparent unauthorised publication of material produced as a result of a subpoena in the criminal trial of Mr Bruce Lehrmann," he told parliament.

"Material produced to a court in response to a subpoena is subject to an implied undertaking from the parties who receive it, that it won't be used for purposes other than for those court proceedings… to breach it may constitute a contempt of court.

"I do understand that the Australian Federal Police have received a complaint in respect of this matter and that the AFP is currently assessing that complaint.

"It's vital that victims of alleged sexual assault have confidence that if they come forward and report what happened to them they will be treated fairly by our justice system."

Gallagher wasn't the only politician to defend their actions over their handling of Higgins' allegations in parliament today.

Former prime minister Scott Morrison also denied he misled the house after being accused of doing just that by Reynolds' former chief of staff, Fiona Brown.

In an interview with The Australian over the weekend, Reynolds' former chief of staff, Fiona Brown, accused Morrison of telling parliament he had talked to her about Higgins' allegations when they had not.

While Morrison admitted that Brown's version of events may be more accurate than his own, the former PM insisted he had never deliberately misled the chamber.

While my recollection differed to that of Ms Brown, given there's more than two years that have passed… while I believe my response to accurate at the time, I cannot obviously fully discount her recollection of those events now were the more accurate," Morrison said.

"However, I reject any suggestion of deliberate intent in any such possible inaccuracy to my response."

Readers seeking support can contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or beyond blue on 1300 22 4636.

Suicide Call Back Service 1300 659 467.

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.9news.com.au/national/katy-gallagher-senate-statement-denies-misleading-parliament-brittany-higgins-allegations/c410f1cf-b78e-44f5-88e7-14d84e24112b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2tfbK7OfJM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998327

File: 6fe4c7c0d9f3304⋯.jpg (70.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_issued_a_st….jpg)

File: 6b531b362e9b3fd⋯.jpg (117.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,CLP_Senator_Jacinta_Nampij….jpg)

File: 40d3015ed3b8e24⋯.jpg (96.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Wilkinson_s_gibes_against_….jpg)

File: 7197bd6d4782e2d⋯.jpg (165.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Wilkinson_comments_wer….jpg)

>>18954987

>>18977231

>>18977278

Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Lisa Wilkinson has not contacted her personally to apologise

JOANNE WILLIAMSON - JUNE 13, 2023

The Indigenous senator who was mocked by Lisa Wilkinson as a “diversity pick” says the star journalist has not contacted her personally to apologise.

Northern Territory CLP Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price lashed Wilkinson on Friday after audio emerged of the media personality making comments about the senator and struggling to pronounce her name during a pre-interview with Brittany Higgins and her partner David Sharaz.

Late on Friday the former host of The Project released a statement saying: “I sincerely apologise to Senator Price for any offence I may have caused.

“The conversation was private and not intended to appear as it has out of context and in the public arena.

“The tenor of our conversation was about the need for real, genuine change within the Liberal party, and that too many of their female pre-selections were in unwinnable positions.”

But Senator Price said on Monday Wilkinson still had not contacted her, saying instead the apology statement had been passed onto her via her staff.

“She hasn’t personally made an apology to myself,” Senator Price told Sharri Markson on Sky News in her first interview since the incident on Monday.

“If she was a real woman, I’d guess she’d ring me and personally apologise.”

She said the head of Paramount Australia, Beverley McGarvey, had called her to apologise on behalf of the 10 Network, but but Wilkinson had not.

On Friday, Senator Price took aim at Wilkinson, saying the journalist was living in an ivory tower and was far removed from real issues pertaining to Indigenous Australians.

“They’re derogatory and racist comments … what would you expect from individuals who belong to the woke,” she told 2GB.

“The Project has never been interested in the view of a conservative Indigenous woman from outback Australia. Not once has it demonstrated interest in the concerns I’ve raised.”

Senator Price said what had offended her the most was Wilkinson’s suggestion she was some sort of diversity pick.

“I would absolutely expect an apology from the 10 network, from Lisa Wilkinson herself. That would be the decent thing,” she said.

“Unfortunately, this woke culture allows racism to exist in plain sight.”

The comments were made in a pre-interview session with Ms Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz.

In a leaked part of a pre-recorded interview with Higgins, Wilkinson pointed out the coalition had “preselected over 20 new and wonderfully diverse and strong female candidates like, and what’s her name, Nam … Nampinjumba? (sic). She’s an Indigenous woman.”

In response, Mr Sharaz laughed and said: “She clearly got in. Clearly it was a safe seat.”

“That’s the thing, it was – as soon as I looked at it I thought, ‘Oh, you’re joking’,” Wilkinson said.

Mr Sharaz added: “They’ve been preselected in unwinnable seats.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous-senator-jacinta-nampijinpa-price-says-lisa-wilkinson-has-not-contacted-her-personally-to-apologise/news-story/3762713c01ac0fb732601a36aba317c7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998342

File: 6740ffdc818fa1d⋯.jpg (124.89 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Recordings_of_a_five_hour_….jpg)

File: c38948a188b793f⋯.jpg (2.49 MB,4888x3259,4888:3259,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Lehrmann court leak of Wilkinson recordings referred to police

Angus Thompson and James Massola - June 12, 2023

Recordings of a five-hour meeting involving Brittany Higgins and journalist Lisa Wilkinson that were leaked to the media have been referred to police to investigate whether a contempt of court has been committed by passing on sensitive documents originally meant for the Bruce Lehrmann criminal trial.

That release comes as Finance Minister Katy Gallagher faces a barrage of questions over her knowledge of the sexual assault allegation in the lead-up to Higgins initially going public, following the publication of text messages indicating the Labor frontbencher was made aware in early 2021.

Thomson Geer law firm partner Marlia Saunders, who is acting for Network Ten in Lehrmann’s defamation proceedings, made a complaint to ACT Policing last Wednesday about material issued under subpoena for his criminal trial being aired in a televised interview with the Seven Network last week.

“I asked them to investigate the suspected breach of the implied undertaking given that documents produced under subpoena to the ACT Supreme Court … criminal proceedings appear to have been provided to various media organisations contrary to the implied undertaking,” Saunders said.

Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to raping Higgins in the office of then-defence minister Linda Reynolds in the early hours of March 23, 2019, in a trial that was aborted in October last year due to juror misconduct, with the proceedings being ultimately discontinued in December.

ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, who dropped the case against Lehrmann, was due to return to work on Tuesday after taking leave during a public inquiry into his and others’ handling of the trial, but that leave has now been extended until June 30 at his request.

Drumgold has come under fire over multiple aspects of his conduct during the case, and questions hang over his future.

ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury said the inquiry would report to the territory government by July 31.

“The government will respond accordingly once it has had time to consider the recommendations,” he said.

Network Ten, which aired Wilkinson’s interview of Higgins on The Project the day the latter went public with her allegation on February 15, 2021, produced material to the court that was never used in the trial, but has since been distributed to the media by unidentified sources.

Acting ACT DPP Anthony Williamson, SC, told Saunders in an email, released in Lehrmann’s defamation case against media outlets, that the breach of the undertaking constituted a contempt of court.

According to an email from Saunders to Williamson, the material included transcripts and recordings relating to a meeting involving Higgins and Wilkinson ahead of the recorded interview.

Williams said he did not propose to institute proceedings for contempt of court, but said Ten could do so.

ACT Policing declined to comment on Saunders’ complaint when contacted on Monday, however, Saunders said police had confirmed they had received the complaint, and also confirmed they did not provide the subpoenaed material to the Seven Network, which aired an interview with Lehrmann on June 4.

The interview with Lehrmann, who has always maintained his innocence, preceded stories in The Australian that purported to reveal text messages between Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz, in early 2021, in which Sharaz said he had told Katy Gallagher of the rape allegation.

The Coalition will use Senate question time this week to pile pressure on Gallagher after she told federal parliament in June 2021 she had no knowledge of Higgins’ claim before The Project story went to air.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/lehrmann-court-leak-of-wilkinson-recordings-referred-to-police-20230612-p5dfvh.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998374

File: daee3482ae63190⋯.mp4 (15.26 MB,640x360,16:9,_Completely_untrue_Higgins….mp4)

File: 312f7ff4df67698⋯.jpg (150.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Liberal_Senator_Linda_Reyn….jpg)

File: 0ff5644bb1f4592⋯.jpg (107.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_the_Environme….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Linda Reynolds sues Tanya Plibersek for defamation over Brittany Higgins comments

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and ELLIE DUDLEY - JUNE 13, 2023

Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds has taken legal action against Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek, claiming Ms Plibersek defamed her in a television interview by stating she had “covered up” Brittany Higgins’ alleged rape.

In a defamation concerns notice obtained by The Australian, Senator Reynolds accused Ms Plibersek of making false statements throughout the Channel 7 interview, that implied she had acted inappropriately during the investigation of Ms Higgins’ allegations and had attempted to “hide the commission of a criminal offence.”

During the interview, which aired on Monday morning, Ms Plibersek stated: “The central point here is that a young woman made an allegation that she had been sexually assaulted in her workplace and that it had been inappropriately investigated, even covered up by her employers.”

Ms Plibersek went on to say Senator Reynolds was aware of the “Brittany Higgins allegations’ … years before” and said she was “the boss of both people involved”, according to the concerns notice.

“Collectively your comments are plainly defamatory of my client, including but not limited to express references to my client as being responsible for the ‘cover up’ of a crime,” the concerns notice read.

Ms Higgins has accused fellow former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann of raping her in the office of Senator Reynolds in 2019. Mr Lehrmann has always maintained his innocence.

When Ms Higgins went public with her allegation that she was raped by Mr Lehrmann, she was highly critical of Senator Reynolds’ handling of the alleged assault, alleging the minister and her staff had failed to support her in the aftermath or properly investigate the incident.

Senator Reynolds claimed that by making the comments, Ms Plibersek had conveyed the defamatory imputations that Senator Reynolds had “acted to conceal or hide the commission of a criminal offence” and had “acted inappropriately during the investigation of the Brittany Higgins’ allegations.”

“Each of the above imputations are totally false, without basis and constitute serious defamations of my client,” the notice read. “You have portrayed an inaccurate and harmful depiction of my client that has prompted damaging speculation amongst the public as to my client‘s conduct.“

While the maximum award for damages and non-economic loss from a defamatory publication is $443,000, Senator Reynolds gave Ms Plibersek the option to “make amends.” To do so, Ms Plibersek must provide a signed apology, retract her comments, pay Senator Reynolds’ legal costs and pay an “appropriate sum to compensate my client for the damage caused by the publication” within 28 days.

When asked for comment, Ms Plibersek told The Australian: “I received this interesting letter today.”

Asked whether she would be issuing an apology to Senator Reynolds or be aiming to make amends, she said: “As far as I‘m concerned, all legal options are on the table.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/linda-reynolds-sues-tanya-plibersek-for-defamation-over-brittany-higgins-comments/news-story/47a98967cf912c3e4d47b39e239b5437

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/current-affairs/tanya-plibersek-rejects-claims-labor-knew-about-brittany-higgins-rape-allegation-weeks-before-story-broke/news-story/42a0bb5c99342f9d2e55d5a56878ec18

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998381

File: 86fbedb99d83d7d⋯.jpg (149.92 KB,1200x675,16:9,Jeffrey_Epstein_remained_a….jpg)

>>18939346

Jeffery Epstein: JP Morgan pays out $429 million to victims, allegedly helped facilitate sex trafficking ring

Daniel Bates - June 13, 2023

JP Morgan last night settled a lawsuit for allegedly facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring for a reported $429 million.

The US bank will pay the money to more than 100 victims of the late paedophile who claimed it turned a blind eye to his abuse of underage girls.

Lawyers for the victims welcomed the settlement but David Boies, who previously represented Prince Andrew’s accuser Virginia Roberts, said it was “not enough but it’s close” – a line from the 1973 film The Sting.

It brings to an end the case that was filed in November at a court in New York by an anonymous woman named only as Jane Doe.

The bank is still engaged in a legal battle with its former chief executive Jes Staley over who was responsible for keeping Epstein as a client. It is unclear how much, if anything, he will have to pay.

The $538 million figure was reported by Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal but no other details were released.

In a statement, JP Morgan and the victims’ lawyers said: “The parties believe this settlement is in the best interests of all parties, especially the survivors who were the victims of Epstein’s terrible abuse.”

While Mr Boies did not appear wholly satisfied, he said: “It has taken a long time, too long, but today is a great day for Jeffrey Epstein survivors and a great day for justice”.

Sigrid McCawley, another victims’ lawyer, said: “Money, which for far too long flowed with impunity between Jeffrey Epstein’s global sex trafficking enterprise and Wall Street’s leading banks, is decisively being used for good.”

“The settlements signal that financial institutions have an important role to play in spotting and shutting down sex trafficking.”

The lawsuit alleged that JP Morgan ignored numerous red flags about Epstein’s sex trafficking because of the volume of business he brought in.

He became a client in 1998 and, in a ruling unsealed hours after the settlement was announced, a judge said the bank “either knew or should have known” Epstein was trafficking girls as far back as 2002.

In 2008 he was sentenced to 13 months in prison for soliciting underage girls for prostitution, yet JP Morgan kept him as a client until 2013.

Epstein hanged himself in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

Among the revelations that emerged during the case were suggestive messages - referring to Disney princesses - between Epstein and Mr Staley, who later became head of Barclays bank but was forced to step down over his ties to the paedophile.

Mr Staley’s lawyers did not respond to requests for comment.

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/crime/jeffery-epstein-jp-morgan-pays-out-429-million-to-victims-allegedly-helped-facilitate-sex-trafficking-ring–c-10962201

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998407

File: e901b0a8c1c6b2a⋯.jpg (61.11 KB,780x507,20:13,PIlots_in_a_Hongdu_JL_10_a….jpg)

File: 7ea8f0662f390ab⋯.jpg (618.15 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0001.jpg)

File: 6fabd84490a056d⋯.jpg (741.33 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0002.jpg)

File: 7bd42fa6da60672⋯.jpg (620.33 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0003.jpg)

>>18929002

>>18929024

>>18940061

USA puts flying schools on Entity List for training PLA aircrew

Greg Waldron - 13 June 2023

The US Department of Commerce has added international flight schools to its Entity List, stating that they have recruited Western pilots to provide training for China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

The two companies, the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) and Hong Kong-based Frontier Service Group, were among 43 entities added to the list. Entities on the list are subject to additional licensing requirements and policies beyond the USA’s standard Export Administration Regulations.

The Commerce Department says that the various entities added have provided assistance to Beijing in areas such as pilot training, aircraft manoeuvres and tactics, hypersonic weapons development, and weapon lifecycle management using Western software.

“Preventing advanced technologies from being used as part of China’s civil-military fusion strategy and threatening U.S. national security is our top priority,” says Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Alan Estevez.

TFASA units in China, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and United Kingdom joined the list, along with Frontier units in China, Kenya, Laos, and the UAE.

Several entities falling under China’s AVIC aviation group were also added.

“It is imperative that we prevent China from acquiring US technologies and know-how to enable to their military modernisation programs,” adds Matthew Axelrod, Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement.

“And that’s why, today, we’re adding parties tied to China’s hypersonics, naval modernisation, and military training programs to our entity list.”

TFASA’s website suggests significant involvement in China, including an image of an AVIC Hongdu JL-10 advanced jet trainer on its landing page. A page about the company’s test pilot and flight test engineer training capabilities shows another Chinese jet trainer, the Guizhou JL-9.

The TFASA site says that company aircrew have experience with a range of Western rotary and fixed-wing combat types including the Boeing AH-64 Apache, Airbus Helicopters Tiger, Eurofighter Typhoon, Saab Gripen, the Dassault Mirage F1, and several others.

“TFASA delivers Specialist flight training that includes Ab-Initio through to the full spectrum of advanced operational and tactical training for both fixed wing aircraft and helicopters,” says the company’s website.

In October 2022, TFASA stated that its training activities are fully legitimate and comply with all laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates.

FlightGlobal has reached out to TFASA and Hong Kong-based Frontier for comment.

China’s tapping of former western military pilots has come into the spotlight in the last 12 months. Former US Marine Corps pilot Daniel Edmund Duggan is in Australia fighting extradition to the USA. He faces allegations that he helped train Chinese military pilots.

In October 2022, the UK’s Ministry of Defence condemned the practice of former pilots with the UK armed forces accepting paid jobs training their Chinese counterparts. German publication Spiegel International recently carried a report of former Luftwaffe pilots moving to China to take up instructor roles supporting the PLA.

https://www.flightglobal.com/defence/usa-puts-flying-schools-on-entity-list-for-training-pla-aircrew/153674.article

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3287-rainbow-trout-rule-press-release/file

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998479

File: 2b2cfd6fb2135c7⋯.mp4 (6.96 MB,720x406,360:203,Ukrainian_troops_learn_to_….mp4)

File: f484fd1f127155a⋯.jpg (1.61 MB,3426x2284,3:2,Oleksandr_is_tasked_with_d….jpg)

File: 5dbae2622558987⋯.jpg (1.96 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Rustam_is_training_fellow_….jpg)

File: 01c9dd84303eda2⋯.jpg (2.93 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Vladyslav_says_a_Bushmaste….jpg)

File: f2973766d332d21⋯.jpg (2.27 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Ukrainian_troops_say_the_B….jpg)

>>18949906

>>18960257

Australia's Bushmasters to play 'huge role' in Ukrainian counteroffensive against Russia, troops say

Steve Cannane and West Matteeussen - 13 June 2023

1/2

In a secret location in eastern Ukraine, frontline troops from the 80th Air Assault Brigade are putting one of their Bushmasters through its paces.

From the turret at the top of the vehicle, machine gun fire blasts into the distance.

These soldiers are practising advancing and withdrawing in combat as they prepare for the frontline battles that could prove decisive in the counteroffensive.

"It's fantastic," says driver Oleksandr when asked about the armoured personnel carrier that was built in Bendigo.

"Words cannot express it. It's such a powerful vehicle. It is much easier to drive than our equipment," he says.

Australia pledged 90 Bushmasters to Ukraine after President Zelenskyy addressed the national parliament last year and asked for the vehicles. They have proved invaluable to Ukraine's armed forces over the past year.

Bushmasters can carry 10 troops at a time in and out of frontline areas. They can also act as ambulances and command, patrol or support vehicles.

They are mobile, resilient and present a small target on the battlefield.

Rustam, who is running a training session the ABC has been granted access to, says the Australian vehicle has superior armour to other troop carriers.

"Bushmasters work perfectly. They can withstand RPG shots, run into mines, and tame enemy machine guns," he says.

"This type of transport is used during assault operations for the unit, as well as for moving personnel to the front edge of the front, as well as for evacuation."

The Australian Department of Defence has described Bushmasters as "world-renowned for innovative design features which protect its crew and passengers."

The Bushmasters sent to Ukraine have seen a lot of active service at the front lines.

Vladyslav tells the ABC they have helped members of his unit stay alive during some of the fiercest battles in Bakhmut.

"We were assigned the task of advancing to Bakhmut, the whole world knows what a difficult situation there is there and remains to this day," he says.

"We came under fire from Russian artillery, we were covered with Grad MLRS and large-calibre mortars, but this vehicle survived and everyone inside, including me, remained alive."

Ukrainian soldiers are incredibly thankful for the Bushmasters that have been sent by Australia.

"I am very grateful to our Australian brothers for supporting us in this difficult hour for our country," says Vladyslav.

"They supported us not only in words, not only diplomatically, but also in deeds. They sent their wonderful machines, which perform their task very well in the defence of Ukrainian independence."

"If the Australians were around, I would hug them,” adds Oleksandr.

"I would like to thank them very much for helping us."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.18998482

File: cc6c48ceffbe0f5⋯.jpg (736.4 KB,825x1489,825:1489,OR_1.jpg)

File: 9ec0d89d8c99b35⋯.mp4 (10.74 MB,640x360,16:9,kMroBNyxC8D6jI5M.mp4)

>>18998479

2/2

Ukraine's Defence Minister Oleksi Reznikov recently released a video message calling on Australia to send more Bushmasters as well as tanks and Hawkei vehicles.

He described Australia as "a nation of freedom-loving warriors who always stand up to a bully" and said getting more Australian combat vehicles could help Ukraine during the counteroffensive.

The soldiers of 80th Air Assault Brigade would also like to see Australia send more armoured vehicles to Ukraine.

"We want more. We really want to have more Bushmasters in my unit, in each platoon, preferably for each squad," says Vladyslav.

"Australia, please give us more Bushmasters. At least 15 more per battalion. That would be ideal," says Rustam.

These soldiers believe that Bushmasters will play a critical role in the counteroffensive, as Ukraine attempts to liberate the 18 per cent of its country that remains under Russian occupation.

"I would say that they will play a huge role," says Oleksandr.

The 80th Air Assault Brigade have been training hard in recent months and are confident that victory will come from the counteroffensive.

"We are ready for different situations, for different types of combat, for defence, and offence," says Rustam.

"Our personnel are motivated, know why and who we are fighting, and most importantly, we have something to fight for," he says.

"There will be a counterattack, it will be powerful and it will be victorious for us," says Vladyslav.

"And Ukrainian independence will be restored and our borders from 1991 will be restored."

"I know that [the counteroffensive] will definitely return Russia to where it came from - to its Moscow swamps."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-13/bushmasters-changing-the-battlefield-in-ukraine/102471094

https://twitter.com/oleksiireznikov/status/1662944820132708353

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005407

File: e1f466068b92d59⋯.jpg (171.98 KB,1280x853,1280:853,An_official_Yes_campaign_f….jpg)

File: f50ad08a6151444⋯.jpg (72.97 KB,1024x576,16:9,Yes_campaign_for_Indigenou….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992119

Yes23 group under increasing scrutiny over Indigenous Voice campaign tactics

Dana Morse - 14 June 2023

1/2

Yes23 is under increasing pressure to take control of the campaign for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, as the final vote on the legislation in parliament looms.

There are concerns within the government caucus the Yes23 campaign has not ramped up quickly enough, allowing the No campaign a foothold in the debate.

A senior member of Yes23 told the ABC, internal polling indicates all six states are still in winnable positions for the Yes camp, and support for the Voice sits between numbers published this week by Resolve, which has been trending downward for some time and dipped below 49 per cent this week, and the Guardian Essential poll which has the proposal holding steady at 60 per cent in favour.

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin said those working on campaign strategy are aware of the challenges polling presents.

"We always knew that that was going to happen, we always knew that a referendum is not an easy thing to win and it hasn't helped that a lot of the conversation has been bogged in that Canberra bubble with politicians and lawyers thrashing it out," he said.

"This issue has been over-examined. Everybody has had their go at it.

"We are about a week away from the bill finally passing the parliament, as you say, triggering the referendum and we can't wait for that to happen and for the campaign to kick off properly."

Sources within the campaign also told the ABC that Yes23 is deliberately running a strategy separate to the federal government.

Yes Campaigner Marcus Stewart, who led the First Peoples Assembly in Victoria which is currently working towards Voice, Treaty and Truth at a state level, said he's confident in the process.

"You can have the best strategy in the world, but success is based on personnel and execution," Mr Stewart said.

"I'm confident we've got what it takes to deliver."

Yes23 campaign strategy criticised

The ABC understands data from within the Yes23 campaign showed the biggest influence on voters is First Nations leaders and elders, Indigenous politicians, and then Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, but the initial campaign strategy was based on achieving bipartisan support in the parliament.

However, the group faced criticism for failing to converse with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, including from GetUp chief executive and Widjabul Wia-bal woman Larissa Baldwin-Roberts.

"Yes23 are leading a campaign that First Nations communities are vocally criticising — our communities are feeling left behind in a moment they are also feeling forced to respond to," Ms Baldwin-Roberts said.

"My worry is that if Yes[23] don't adapt they'll squander an opportunity that could deliver reforms for the next decade for us."

It's understood there are differences of opinion within Yes23 over the most effective strategy going forward, including whether to pursue the support of corporate Australia or whether to focus on grassroots communities.

One member of the Yes camp said going after corporate Australia made sense, based on the potential of attracting support from ASX listed companies and their large staffing footprints.

The Yes campaign has already guaranteed support from major national institutions, including all of the major sporting codes, Wesfarmers, Woolworths, Coles and several of the big banks.

Others within the campaign said the changeable voters currently swinging towards the No side will be most influenced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, not by big businesses.

Ms Baldwin-Roberts said the campaign should be looking to communities ahead of corporations.

"First Nations people make up a small but important part of the vote and campaign that is critical to engaging non-Indigenous voters that are wanting to see genuine embracing from our communities — not government bodies, the same talking heads, corporations and politicians," Ms Baldwin-Roberts said.

"You can blame the divisive no tactics and misinformation being spread by Peter Dutton, Advanced Australia and the Murdoch Press. But you can't blame them for failing to connect with voters.

"They've got the financial resources, parliament has done its bit — no more excuses get out there and connect with voters."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005408

File: 64b6262401b7ed0⋯.jpg (297.77 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>19005407

2/2

Minister accuses Opposition of 'Trump politics' in Voice debate

The parliament is expected to finalise the constitution alteration bill over the next sitting fortnight, with the bill currently before the senate for debate.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has fired a warning shot at the Coalition to keep the debate factual, accusing shadow ministers of playing "Trump politics" with the campaign.

"I fear that the No campaign is importing American style-Trump politics to Australia, at its heart is a post-truth approach to politics. Its aim is to polarise people and its weapon of choice is misinformation," Ms Burney told the CEDA (Committee for Economic Development of Australia) conference on Monday night.

"The Australian people are better than Trump politics from the No campaign. A No campaign that has no solutions for the challenges that we face."

It comes after the Liberal party came under fire for the remarks of several MPs in the lower house during a debate on the constitution alteration bill, including frontbenchers Angus Taylor and Andrew Hastie, for misrepresenting the remarks of two federal court judges from the parliamentary inquiry into the bill.

The bill is expected to be brought on for a vote by the middle of next week, and once the legislation passes the upper house it will be up to the prime minister to announce the date for the referendum, which is currently slated to be around the middle of October.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-14/yes23-under-scrutiny-over-indigenous-voice-campaign-tactics/102475822

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005414

File: f163f80e1cce31f⋯.jpg (170.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992119

‘We can’t turn back now’, Linda Burney digs in on Indigenous voice to parliament model

ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - JUNE 14, 2023

Linda Burney and prominent supporters of an Indigenous voice to parliament are staring down calls to reset the Yes campaign or delay the referendum and reconciliation, with the Indigenous Australians Minister declaring Australia has come too far to turn back now.

As polling continues to show a fall in support for the voice and Peter Dutton urges Anthony Albanese to unite the country by pursuing only constitutional recognition, Ms Burney accused the No campaign of importing American Trump-style politics by weaponising misinformation.

Digging in behind the government’s chosen model for the voice, which has the power to make representations to the parliament and executive government on matters affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Ms Burney told the Committee for Economic Development of Australia’s state of the nation conference on Tuesday night: “We have come too far as a nation on this journey of reconciliation to turn back now.

“We have to go forward. We have everything to gain and nothing to lose by supporting the voice … It is an opportunity to ensure we are getting the best possible advice from the ground. It is a mechanism for us to listen, so that we can make better policies and help close the gap. Because more of the same is not good enough.”

Sean Gordon, co-convener of the Liberals for Yes campaign and chair of conservative think-tank Uphold and Recognise, said a major reset was not necessary and momentum would shift in the voice’s favour once the debate moved out of federal parliament.

“We’ve got to run the course. We’ve started a process; we’ve got to finish it,” Mr Gordon said.

“You can either come out early and try and combat this period of pressure that we’re facing or it could cost you a lot of money and time in wasting people’s valuable resource. We have to just see out this period (of political debate).”

Some Yes campaigners conceded that, whatever the polls said, they had to turn the tide and make the voice more palatable.

The latest Newspoll, conducted for The Australian, revealed only 46 per cent of voters approved of altering the Constitution to give effect to the voice as proposed by the government.

The Opposition Leader said Australians knew instinctively that inserting a new chapter into the Constitution was a very big deal and not something that could be done without detail.

Mr Dutton said he would work with the Prime Minister to pursue constitutional recognition, but he didn’t specify how.

“The polls today have suggested that the best case is that the voice gets up by a slim majority and the country is divided,” Mr Dutton said, according to a Coalition spokeswoman.

“Labor have rejected all chances and all suggestions to give the referendum its best chance of success. There is an opportunity now for the Prime Minister to unify the country and that’s through constitutional recognition without the constitutionally enshrined voice. And we will work with the Prime Minister to do this.”

Megan Davis and Pat Anderson, co-chairs of the Uluru Dialogue who have travelled across the country to advocate for the voice, said when they sat down and explained the difference the voice would make, Australians were more than ready to vote Yes.

“We’re so heartened by those conversations with regards to recognition through a constitutionally enshrined voice, and our faith in the Australian people remains as strong as ever,” they said.

“We take seriously our responsibility to our own people who told us throughout the regional dialogues and national convention process – and continue to tell us in overwhelming numbers – that the meaningful change we seek is worth our combined efforts.”

Marcus Stewart, co-chair of the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria and a member of the Albanese government’s referendum working group, said polling showing a fall in support for the voice was “completely disjointed” from “the sentiment and reality of what we are seeing and hearing”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/we-cant-turn-back-now-linda-burney-digs-in-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-model/news-story/0d4a399a0ddb2b47b995ad8e7d6649c1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005424

File: 12e6602ba74b5ba⋯.jpg (342.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_with_her_….jpg)

File: 648fd490b7bb240⋯.jpg (70.46 KB,768x1024,3:4,Linda_Reynolds.jpg)

File: 4c4486e6f5a8a92⋯.jpg (118.23 KB,768x1024,3:4,Fiona_Brown.jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Higgins, Sharaz and Wilkinson’s media campaign has backfired

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - JUNE 13, 2023

1/2

The beauty of the press is that it can’t be controlled. True, the supine, the stupid and the ideological end of the press can be manipulated, but eventually, in a free and open society with a competitive media, if a story is important enough, the press will usually ensure the truth comes out.

That beauty became a problem for Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz. They made a rookie’s error when they set out on a strategy to use the media, instead of the criminal justice system, to press their case.

They appear to have assumed they would always be able to control the narrative, to shape the headlines, to run their preferred lines without critical analysis – with the help of enough supporters in the media.

Perhaps they thought their experience with Lisa Wilkinson on The Project would be repeated over and over again.

Having tried to mould the media message, they cannot complain when some parts of the media – including this newspaper – decline to be shaped for their purposes. That was the gamble Higgins and Sharaz took.

Remember that the strategy of making this a media and political story instead of a criminal justice matter was a deliberate choice by Higgins and her advisers. There is no evidence that any of Higgins’s media supporters advised the young woman against this.

In a sign of how skewed this story became, the evidence to date suggests that two people, and only two people, encouraged Higgins to go to the police when there was an inkling of sexual activity: her old boss, senator Linda Reynolds, and former chief of staff Fiona Brown.

As Steven Whybrow SC, Bruce Lehrmann’s barrister, said to this newspaper: “Ms Higgins was asked by the police to not do media until she’d spoken to the police. Now if she’d listened to the police, if they had taken a statement from her and then gone and arrested Bruce, The Project wouldn’t have been able to play their interview because it would’ve been a breach of sub judice rules about outstanding criminal charges. But by doing it this way, he was out there, he was already the man who raped Brittany Higgins.”

Indeed, there are several extremely important protections available to complainants, such as the right to remain anonymous, that would have been available to Higgins had she followed the usual criminal justice process.

Tanya Plibersek spoke of a “rape”, not an “alleged rape”, in parliament. Prime minister Scott Morrison apologised to Higgins for the things that happened in Parliament House. It was nothing short of grotesque.

The effect of the Higgins-Sharaz media and political campaign was not merely to put themselves in the spotlight but to deprive Lehrmann of the presumption of innocence and the due process a normal criminal justice investigation would have given him.

The inference is open that they wanted to convict Lehrmann in the media, whatever a jury decided. This dreadful strategy drove Lehrmann, not surprisingly, to the edge of suicide. Not that the Higgins-Sharaz media cheer squad seemed to care one jot about this. Just another necessary victim of the movement, the hardheads of #MeToo no doubt would have thought.

This strategy caused terrible collateral damage to others, too. Reynolds’s health suffered terribly after Higgins made unfounded accusations against her. Similar claims led Brown to wade into the surf one day, planning to swim out to drown or be taken by a shark. She was saved by a nearby surfer who asked if she was OK, took her hand and led her back to the beach.

And never forget that Kimberley Kitching died of a suspected heart attack after being bullied by a group of Labor women she dubbed the “mean girls”.

Katy Gallagher was one of the trio of mean girls, along with Penny Wong and Kristina Keneally, who targeted Kitching reportedly because she was horrified that Labor women were planning to weaponise a rape allegation for ugly political purposes.

When is too much for these people? How they can live with any of these events that followed the deliberately chosen and carefully considered media and political strategy of Higgins and Sharaz is for them and their consciences.

Now the tide has turned. As would always happen, the media being free and all. Higgins, Sharaz and their media supporters cannot credibly complain that uncomfortable questions are being asked or that new information is being exposed by this newspaper.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005426

File: bf9fcbee19c29d9⋯.jpg (109.83 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Senator_Katy_Gallagher_lef….jpg)

>>19005424

2/2

Yet, incredibly, some are. Hearing Higgins’s support club in the media wail about privacy and leaked material rings hollow indeed given the role they played in upturning the presumption of innocence.

They continue to overlook the uncomfortable reality that Higgins deliberately chose, and was egged on by these same journalists, to make this affair a matter for the media and the political class.

They went against the advice of the police. They trashed Lehrmann’s right to the presumption of innocence. They targeted Reynolds and Brown, uninterested in describing their support for Higgins fairly and honestly.

Where is the gnashing of teeth about Wilkinson and producer Angus Llewellyn, caught in the five-hour audio discussing Higgins’s plan to tape a private conversation she had with senator Michaelia Cash?

This has a long way to run. Yet too many in the media are still unable to engage their critical faculties, let alone display professional journalism, in case it interferes with their #MeToo advocacy.

Remarkable features of the cosy and unquestioning relationship between The Project and the Higgins-Sharaz team have attracted insufficient attention to date.

Consider the emails exchanged between Wilkinson and Sharaz headed “#MeToo Liberal Party Project Pitch”. And consider this: in a text to Higgins, Sharaz reveals that The Project had given him an advance copy of the final Wilkinson-Higgins interview at least four days before it went to air, and that he had given it to Gallagher.

Was this for pre-vetting? Does this indicate the interview was more akin to a joint venture between this group at the Ten Network and Higgins and Sharaz rather than an arms-length interview? Since when does this deserve even a Logie?

Hypocrisy of Olympic level heights has abounded in this affair and no doubt there is much room for more. Will the Albanese government, which championed a new era of transparency and honesty at the election, condone what appears to be a clear case of Gallagher, at minimum, misleading parliament?

What about the teals? These apparent paragons of virtue appear to have gone missing in action on Gallagher’s dubious statements, not to mention the need for the new National Anti-Corruption Commission to examine the circumstances of Higgins’s multimillion-dollar, uncontested payout.

Given Labor’s relentless weaponisation of the rape allegation, Australians are entitled to ask: was Labor’s motive, in making this payment to Higgins, one of paying for services rendered?

Whatever happens, the more honest brokers will ask themselves: would any of this have happened if Higgins had taken police advice not to speak to the media?

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/higgins-sharaz-and-wilkinsons-media-campaign-has-backfired/news-story/bc888b9c9410ed63ddc42b181a56bde2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005438

File: 342df45d5ef9aa6⋯.jpg (95.54 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_s_photo_o….jpg)

File: cf25c39a1cf3241⋯.jpg (242.3 KB,941x1255,941:1255,Brittany_Higgins_s_statuto….jpg)

File: f265052ec4f6451⋯.jpg (325.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_leaving_t….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Brittany Higgins explains leg bruise injury photo date discrepancy

KRISTIN SHORTEN - JUNE 14, 2023

1/2

Brittany Higgins’s explanation of why the photograph of a bruise on her leg did not match the timeline of her rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann has finally been revealed.

File notes made by ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates reveal that Ms Higgins told senior police that the leg bruise image she had provided to them and high-profile journalists was actually a screenshot of the original picture which had been mysteriously wiped from her phone by someone else.

In early 2021 Ms Higgins had provided journalists and police with a photograph showing a large bruise on her thigh, which she claimed Mr Lehrmann inflicted by pinning her leg to the side of a couch during an alleged raped in Linda Reynolds’s ministerial suite in the early hours of March 23, 2019.

On February 10, 2021 Ms Higgins signed a legally binding statutory declaration stating that the picture had been taken on April 3, 2019 which was 11 days after the alleged attack.

“The photograph at annexure B shows the bruise on my leg that was caused by Bruce Lehrmann during the rape and sexual assault that occurred in Minister Reynolds’ office on March 22-23, 2019,” the statutory declaration states.

“I took the photograph with my iPhone at annexure B on April 3, 2019.”

Days later, on February 15, 2021, the leg bruise photo was aired on The Project.

But digital forensic experts said there was no evidence of the image existing on Ms Higgins’s phones until just a few weeks before the rape allegations went to air in February 2021.

Police also discovered there was no evidence to corroborate the leg injury as Ms Higgins had not made any previous mention of it in her text messages or disclosures about it.

Ms Yates’ file notes, tendered at the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system, reveal that when questioned about this, Ms Higgins told police the image she provided them with was actually a screenshot of a picture which she had stored on WhatsApp.

According to Ms Yates’ file notes, Ms Higgins told police that the original leg bruise image was lost when the encrypted messaging app was later deleted from her phone, along with other files.

During a meeting with police at Brisbane in July 2021 Ms Higgins told Detective Superintendent Scott Moller and Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman that she had stored the original photo in a message to herself on WhatsApp.

“I took it to send to myself via WhatsApp during Budget week 2019,” she told police, according to Ms Yates’ notes.

“Police have screenshot dated 19 Jan 2021. Was when BH sent to The Project.”

Detectives asked when the photograph was originally taken and whether it would still be on the mobile phone Ms Higgins had used at the time.

But, according to Ms Yates’ notes, Ms Higgins “confirmed that WhatsApp had been wiped (she wasn’t the one who did this). No longer has original picture.”

During cross examination at Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial in October, Ms Higgins denied fabricating evidence.

Defence barrister Steven Whybrow had quizzed Ms Higgins about the image’s authenticity and why she had not mentioned the photo to police earlier, including when she made her initial police complaint in April 2019.

Mr Whybrow told the jury that the photo could not be located when police examined Ms Higgins’s phones in January 2021.

“In those extractions there is no reference to this bruise before January 2021,” he put to the complainant.

Ms Higgins responded: “I don’t think I sent it to anyone. I sent it to Samantha Maiden and Lisa Wilkinson … but until I was making a police complaint, why would I send that around?”

Mr Whybrow: “I put to you that the bruises and injury you sustained is a fabrication.”

Ms Higgins replied: “I reject that completely.”

Mr Whybrow said: “You did what you thought was necessary to have people believe you had been [sexually assaulted].”

Ms Higgins replied: “I‘m not a monster. I would never do something like that.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005443

File: 08342c15f87cb81⋯.jpg (185.72 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Brittany_Higgins_outside_t….jpg)

>>19005438

2/2

In an interview with Seven’s Spotlight earlier this month Mr Lehrmann, who denies Ms Higgins’s allegation against him, said the leg bruise image “was fabricated or it’s a bruise from much later”.

The 29-year-old’s trial was sensationally aborted in October due to juror misconduct and immediately listed for a retrial in February, before being abandoned altogether. Mr Lehrmann maintains that he is innocent.

Ms Yates’ file notes also reveal that during the meeting with police in Brisbane on July 12, 2021, Moller and Boorman told Ms Higgins that the DPP had advised – based on a partial brief of evidence – that there were “reasonable prospects of conviction”.

The officers said during the meeting that they wanted to “work with BH in a partnership to ensure they put the best evidence before the court” and they needed to clarify a few issues.

The detectives told Ms Higgins that a witness saw her taking photos of herself and others on the night of the alleged rape and asked if she still had the images.

Ms Higgins told police that some of her photos are “available on Google Drive, connected to iCloud” and that “police should be able to access via iCloud”.

Ms Yates recorded in her notes that the officers seemed “unclear how to do this”.

Ms Higgins then opened up her Google Drive account on her phone and showed the detectives photos taken on the evening of March 22, 2019 including a photo of a drink on a table at a bar where herself and Mr Lehrmann were socialising in the hours before the alleged rape.

“(Ms Higgins) advised happy to share direct access to Google Drive,” Ms Yates’ notes said.

Police also told Ms Higgins that they saw, when they examined her phone, that she had sent her partner David Sharaz an audio file with a message saying “I’m clearing out my phone head of giving to police”.

Police asked Ms Higgins why she was deleting data and told her that it “looks deciteful”.

Ms Higgins told the officers, in Ms Yates presence, that she was “getting rid of audio”.

“Had recorded some conversations for personal records. Didn’t know if this was OK. Didn’t want to leave them on her phone,” she explained, according to notes of the meeting.

Supt Moller told her he understood “why you wouldn’t trust the system”.

The officers then asked Ms Higgins if she had received a private email from Mr Lehrmann after the alleged rape.

The complainant told police she had “purged” a lot of emails from him because she had “purged him from her life” but said they might still be in her Gmail trash folder.

The investigations said they would “get their digital team on it” before advising her of the next steps in the process.

“Police emphasised the BH will need support through this time,” Ms Yates recorded in her notes.

“Want her to feel that she’s part of their team.

“She will need to be ready for scrutiny at a whole other level.”

Supt Moller told Ms Yates and Ms Higgins that he “wanted to be able to pick up the phone” to her when required.

“If BH is being influenced by anyone else – pressured by anyone else – please let police know,” the officers added.

The Board of Inquiry’s public hearings into the handling of Ms Higgins’s rape allegation and Mr Lehrmann’s prosecution have been adjourned. The findings of its chair, Walter Sofronoff KC, are due on July 31.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-explains-leg-bruise-injury-photo-date-discrepancy/news-story/1fc0779ab01f2c99422e22cb9475a29d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005464

File: c0ec42853865f38⋯.jpg (84.71 KB,1024x768,4:3,Senator_Gallagher_has_been….jpg)

File: 245a1db9fd86248⋯.jpg (101.24 KB,1024x768,4:3,The_trial_collapsed_follow….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

>>18998319

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher reveals she never declared conflict over multimillion-dollar compensation payout

Katy Gallagher has revealed why she never declared a conflict of interest in relation to a multimillion-dollar compensation payout to Brittany Higgins.

Samantha Maiden - June 14, 2023

1/2

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has said she never declared a conflict of interest in relation to a multimillion-dollar compensation payout to Brittany Higgins because it “never crossed her desk.”

Senator Gallagher has been grilled for a second day over a tip off she received from Ms Higgins boyfriend David Sharaz before the story broke and her relationship with the couple.

News.com.au revealed in December that Ms Higgins’ legal team had entered negotiations over a multimillion-dollar personal injury claim.

It’s believed the original claim includes $2.5 million for future economic loss, past economic loss, general damages of future assistance with at-home care and past and future out-of-pocket expenses of a further $150,000.

Ms Higgins has previously stated that the amount it settled for was less than $3 million.

In the Senate today, Ms Gallagher revealed she was “shocked” and ”stunned” by the claim a Liberal staffer had been raped by a colleague in a ministerial office.

But asked whether she subsequently declared a conflict of interest given her close contact and the fact her own department was responsible for administering the payout she said there was never any need because the negotiation was kept at arms length.

“If it had come to me, I would have declared a conflict but it didn‘t. It didn’t cross my desk,’’ Senator Gallagher said.

“I did not get a brief. If there‘s anything further I can update the Senate about I will. (But) I had no role. And no briefing from the Department of Finance.”

Senator Michaelia Cash then asked Senator Gallagher if she spoke to the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in relation to the matter.

“Did you or your office have any communication with the lawyer general or his office in relation to the proposed settlement of this matter? And if so, please detail the timing of that conduct,‘’ she said.

Senator Gallagher said she had not had contact but would take the question in relation to her office on notice to seek further information.

“I certainly had no contact, no contact with the Attorney General,” Senator Gallagher replied.

“Again, just for the purposes of being absolutely clear to the Senate, I will take other aspects of that on notice because that would require me going and speaking with other people, but from my point of view, no.”

Senator Gallagher asked the Coalition to consider the impact of the current debate on victims of sexual abuse and people considering making a complaint.

“I was given information from a young woman who made a serious allegation about something horrific that had happened to her in this workplace,” she said.

As Liberal MPs interjected “Allegedly!” she then rephrased her response.

“Allegedly I accept that,‘’ she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005467

File: b1371c87a50c3b5⋯.jpg (86.35 KB,1024x768,4:3,Senator_Gallagher_asked_th….jpg)

>>19005464

2/2

Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann was charged in relation to the allegation in August, 2021. He pleaded not guilty and was never convicted.

The trial collapsed following juror misconduct and the DPP subsequently dropped the charge citing concerns over Ms Higgins’ mental health.

In the Senate, Liberal Senator Marise Payne continued to grill her over her refusal to say whether David Sharaz provided her with a full transcript of Ms Higgins interview with The Project before the interview aired.

“She had asked me to keep that information confidential. Which I did,” she said.

She confirmed she did not receive any other tip offs from others including the media before the story went to air.

“It was a serious allegation. I was shocked by it. I was stunned. I couldn‘t believe that something like that allegedly had occurred in this place A couple of years earlier. I was shocked by it. and I was shocked by how upset this young woman seemed to be.

“The timing of this story becoming public, the decisions about Ms Higgins story and how she wanted to tell it, had absolutely nothing to do with me. Absolutely nothing. Well, the implication is in that question is I was involved and I wasn’t.

“I want to remind people here today, just what the message this chamber is sending out to every other woman that might want to stand up.

“I would say that this chamber should think about how this debate and the ongoing coverage of it, is impacting on all the women out there who we are with one mouth saying, ”stand up and tell your story and we will support you” and in the other tongue using the other minister ”If you dare to do it, we will come for you.”

In the Senate, Ms Gallagher was also grilled by Liberal Senator Sarah Henderson over whether she was invited to Mr Sharaz’s wedding to his first wife Alexandra Craig,

Senator Gallagher said she did not recall getting the invite when it was reported but she declined the invitation and received many invitations when she was ACT chief minister.

Labor Senate leader Penny Wong asked the Coalition to “reflect” on a line of questioning based on leaked text messages.

“I would ask people to reflect upon whether that is an ethical thing to do, particularly given what the DPP has said about her state of mind,” she said.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/finance-minister-katy-gallagher-reveals-she-never-declared-conflict-over-multimilliondollar-compensation-payout/news-story/2767c4671e074118fe839e34cabaf129

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005499

File: abbd964849e4007⋯.mp4 (12.5 MB,640x360,16:9,Lidia_Thorpe_makes_serious….mp4)

File: feeb1f44aa07cc9⋯.jpg (1.38 MB,1770x1180,3:2,Lidia_Thorpe_made_her_accu….jpg)

File: 62bb7c37c485bc1⋯.jpg (1.94 MB,2161x1441,2161:1441,Victorian_Liberal_senator_….jpg)

>>18895018 (pb)

Lidia Thorpe accuses fellow senator of ‘sexually assaulting’ her

James Massola - June 14, 2023

Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has in parliament accused Victorian Liberal senator David Van of “harassing” and “sexually assaulting” her.

The allegation was made by Thorpe soon after Senate question time on Wednesday as Van made a speech accusing the Labor Party of disgraceful behaviour in its handling of the Brittany Higgins sexual assault allegations.

“Even yesterday and today the muck that has been thrown from that side [Labor] to this side [Liberal] senators [Michaelia] Cash and [Linda] Reynolds is really just not on and makes a mockery of your words,” he said.

“As parliamentarians we need to be focused on setting the standards.”

As Van speaks, Thorpe can be heard interjecting and calling out the word “perpetrator” and “You can talk! You can talk! You know what you were doing around this time, you know what you were doing around this time don’t you Van? You got away with a lot.”

Senate deputy president Andrew McLachlan repeatedly attempted to stop Thorpe from interjecting.

Then the former Greens senator rose on a point of order and said: “I’m feeling really uncomfortable when a perpetrator is speaking about violence”.

McLachlan replied: “That’s inappropriate and I have to ask you to withdraw that”.

Thorpe said: “I can’t because this person harassed me, sexually assaulted me and the prime minister had to remove him from his office [relocate offices within parliament].

“And to have him talking about this today is an absolute disgrace, on the whole party.”

As Thorpe sat down, McLachlan then said he would have to refer her comments to the Senate President Sue Lines.

Van then rose to his feet and said: “I utterly reject that statement, that disgusting statement outright. It is just a lie and I reject it”.

“I withdraw the word lie. It is just not true.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/lidia-thorpe-accuses-fellow-senator-of-sexually-assaulting-her-20230614-p5dgla.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005517

File: 7043265b8df4d36⋯.jpg (3.15 MB,5078x3385,5078:3385,Ben_Roberts_Smith_has_been….jpg)

>>18934029

‘Massive blow’: AFP war crimes probe collapses over risk of tainted evidence

Nick McKenzie - June 14, 2023

1/2

A five-year Australian Federal Police inquiry into Ben Roberts-Smith’s alleged involvement in the execution of three Afghan captives has collapsed after Commonwealth prosecutors ruled investigators may have unwittingly used tainted evidence.

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions’ (CDPP) decision not to prosecute Roberts-Smith based on evidence gathered during the AFP probe has led to a new joint taskforce being set up to investigate the alleged executions.

The taskforce comprises detectives from the specialist war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI), and a new team of federal police investigators not connected to the abandoned AFP probe.

An AFP spokesman said in connection to the decision to launch a new probe into Roberts-Smith that Operation Emerald was now investigating the allegations.

The CDPP concluded in March that the five-year AFP probe should not lead to a prosecution because of the risk it was unwittingly compromised by the receipt of certain information from the Brereton inquiry, a military inspector general probe which ran from 2016-2020 and used special coercive powers to question SAS soldiers.

The potentially tainted AFP inquiries centred on the alleged execution of two Afghan prisoners at the Whiskey 108 compound on Easter Sunday in 2009 and an incident in which Roberts-Smith allegedly participated in the murder of civilian Ali Jan in September 2012.

The AFP spokesman said it was “committed to working with the OSI to achieve appropriate outcomes in the joint investigations” and that they “will be undertaken as expeditiously as possible”.

A joint OSI-AFP taskforce has already spent months investigating Roberts-Smith over his involvement in several other alleged executions that have no connection to the three at the centre of the CDPP’s decision.

Earlier this month, Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko ruled in a defamation case won by The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times that Roberts-Smith was involved in the killings.

Besanko found that the disgraced war hero kicked Ali Jan off a cliff while he was handcuffed and was implicated in his unlawful execution, as well as those of the two Easter Sunday prisoners.

Besanko largely based his findings on the evidence of Australian special forces soldiers who witnessed the incidents and testified against Roberts-Smith. The standard of proof required for a civil court judge to make a finding is lower than that for a criminal court.

The decision of the CDPP not to criminally prosecute Roberts-Smith raises major questions about why it took Commonwealth prosecutors almost three years to answer an obvious, albeit complex and novel, legal question concerning the use by police of information uncovered by the Brereton inquiry.

The AFP provided the CDPP a brief of evidence involving the Ali Jan cliff incident in about May 2020, at which time Commonwealth prosecutors began to seek internal and external legal advice about the potential problem of evidence tainting, said a source with knowledge of the process who was not permitted to speak publicly.

The laws under which the inspector general operates prohibit the use of certain information derived directly or indirectly from suspects who attended coercive hearings undertaken by Justice Brereton.

“The office of the CDPP has spent way too long making a decision, delaying the ability for the OSI-AFP teams to restart the impacted probes,” said one official source, who was not authorised to comment publicly.

The CDPP declined to comment.

In June last year, this masthead asked Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus if he had sought advice about delays in the Roberts-Smith investigations, potential problems around the handling of Brereton inquiry information and why the existing federal police probes had not been handed to the OSI.

Dreyfus declined to answer the questions last June and when asked on Tuesday said they were a matter for the CDPP.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005520

File: 386d7a2d748a28e⋯.jpg (151.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,_Recklessly_untrue_allegat….jpg)

>>19005517

2/2

The OSI’s existing investigations into Roberts-Smith are not affected by the same problems facing the AFP inquiries because the OSI, which is headed by former judge and top prosecutor Mark Weinberg, adopted a different approach to handling Brereton inquiry information.

The OSI is a special agency that works in partnership with the AFP and was created in 2021 to investigate alleged war crimes.

The OSI has urgently taken over handling of key federal police witnesses linked to the cliff death and Easter Sunday killings, including Special Air Service Regiment (SAS) soldiers who had agreed to testify against Roberts-Smith.

On Tuesday, the AFP said it had sought and abided by internal and external legal advice after it received the information from the Brereton inquiry in 2018 that led to its Roberts-Smith probes.

“The AFP relied on this advice to manage the legal risks known at the time, including how to use the information referred from the [Brereton] inquiry for a criminal investigation, noting some of the information was obtained through the use of powers which compel individuals to attend hearings (coercive powers),” it said.

The AFP’s position was supported by some lawyers from the office of the Australian Government Solicitor, sources with knowledge of the process said.

However, after receiving differing legal advice from external barristers, the CDPP believed there was a risk of a High Court challenge by Roberts-Smith and the prudent approach was to start over.

Legal experts and official sources said the decision to restart the probe with new investigation teams underscored the catastrophic decision by Roberts-Smith to launch defamation action.

The case forced him and his special forces co-accused and witnesses to swear under oath and into the public domain, where their testimony can be accessed by the OSI and AFP without fear of evidence tainting.

Leading criminal law barrister Robert Richter, KC, said: “The calamitous decision [by Roberts-Smith] to launch and run the defamation trial means that significant re-examination by the OSI of the evidence which would or can be used in any criminal trial processes becomes essential.”

Richter said the CDPP’s decision not to prosecute was most likely reached after arduous deliberation and that he had utmost faith in Special Investigator Weinberg to avoid any legal minefields in connection to the relaunched probes.

“What we do know, or can assume, is that whether Ben Roberts-Smith or anyone else is to face grave criminal charges, there will be bitterly contested legal debates about admissibility of some of the evidence,” Richter said.

SAS sources, not authorised to speak publicly, have told this masthead that the delay to an already traumatic investigation process that has taken five years would deeply frustrate witnesses. On Tuesday, one AFP witness told this masthead he had been contacted by federal agents and assured that new OSI-AFP teams would take over his role in the new inquiries.

“It is a massive blow for all the SAS witnesses who have stood up and agreed to co-operate with the federal police five years ago,” said the witness, who cannot be identified because of a non-disclosure order issued in the defamation case.

“The massive delays all seem incompetent to me. It doesn’t sit right,” the witness, an Afghanistan veteran of the SAS, said.

Earlier this month, Justice Besanko ruled Roberts-Smith had intimidated witnesses, a possible breach of the criminal law. Last week, this masthead revealed the AFP sent a witness intimidation brief last November to the CDPP in the hope of charging the ex-soldier. That brief of evidence is unaffected by the CDPP’s decision that the AFP’s handling of Brereton inquiry material may have exposed a future war crimes prosecution to legal appeal.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/massive-blow-afp-war-crimes-probe-collapses-over-risk-of-tainted-evidence-20230613-p5dg7c.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005586

File: b753bf2f22b538e⋯.jpg (423.21 KB,750x874,375:437,KTG_1.jpg)

KanekoaTheGreat Tweet

Australia's Sky News discusses @MarcoPolo501c3 releasing a 630-page report with 2,020 citations that thoroughly documents 459 crimes committed by the Biden family & their business associates.

•140 business crimes

•191 sex crimes

•128 drug crimes

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1668724106001543168

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf0NwQyiWko

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005590

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19005586

'Out of a novel': Hunter Biden's laptop filled with sex, drugs and shady deals exposed

A former Trump aide has revealed the true picture of Hunter Biden's "insane" laptop which came to plague the Biden administration after surfacing only three weeks before the 2020 presidential election.

Maddie Hale - June 2, 2023

1/2

A former aide to Donald Trump has lifted the lid on Hunter Biden’s laptop which has plagued the Democratic Party since it first surfaced in October 2020.

Garrett Ziegler was one of the few people given a copy of the laptop in 2020 by the former president’s ex-lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

He has been named in Hunter Biden’s attorneys demands for the Delaware attorney general, Department of Justice and IRS to investigate those who published the president’s son's personal material.

Within the laptop was a treasure trove of information suggesting the now President’s son had been involved in overseas business deals including lobbying foreign oligarchs, influence peddling. It also includes explicit photos and videos of Hunter engaging in sex acts and taking drugs.

Mr Ziegler detailed the contents in an exclusive interview with Sky News Australia in a bid to paint “a true picture”.

“It’s unprecedented in American history and that we have this much primary source material from a sitting American president,” he said.

“Usually it takes decades for a presidential library's archives to be opened, sometimes even after the man dies.

“This laptop is full of photos, videos, voice mails, calendar entries. So you really get a view of what they actually are like, not the patina that they project to the public.”

The New York Post first broke the story on Hunter Biden’s laptop on October 14, 2020, which revealed ties between Joe Biden, his son and a Ukrainian executive engaging in a business meeting.

This was despite the fact Mr Biden had, and still does, maintain he has “never spoken” with his son about his business deals.

The story was widely passed off as Russian disinformation just three weeks before the 2020 presidential election.

Social media companies heavily censored the story with Twitter even shutting down the New York Post’s account and blocking any user from sharing it.

However, mainstream media outlets in the United States, such as the New York Times eventually conceded there was no evidence to support the Russia disinformation claim.

Mr Zeigler said he didn't get the data copy until after the election.

He received it from Mr Giuliani, who had been given a copy by the owner of a laptop repair shop.

“It just shows that there was a bipartisan operation to protect Joe Biden,” Mr Zeigler said.

“Most people don't realise when we go into this in our dossier 644-page report on the Biden laptop that there were more Republican signatories on that letter than Democrats, and that is hardly ever talked about.

“So this was really a bipartisan operation, a cover up operation to throw cold water on what are totally authentic photos, emails and text messages.

Over the last year Mr Ziegler has been drip-feeding the public hundreds of thousands of private emails, documents and text messages.

And he has now released the Hunter Biden’s personal photos.

“It goes live on June 1st US time, and it's going to be all the photos from the device minus genitalia,” he said.

“We've always wanted to put all the photos up. And we think this is the responsible way to do it.

“We're redacted genitalia. We're redacted Social Security numbers and other credit card numbers so that the public can't, you know, commit identity theft. But they get a true picture of this is all about.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19005597

File: 11b4523751fbe50⋯.jpg (80.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Hunter_Biden_s_laptop_came….jpg)

File: 2ca57608c301962⋯.jpg (48.15 KB,650x488,325:244,Garrett_Ziegler_a_former_a….jpg)

>>19005590

2/2

Hunter Biden is under federal investigation out of Delaware for allegations pertaining to tax crimes, money laundering and lying on a firearm purchase form.

The probe has been operating since 2018 but there have been no charges laid against Hunter Biden.

However, the Washington Post reported in May that prosecutors were near to reaching a decision.

Mr Ziegler said the laptop has evidence that Hunter Biden lied on October 12 2018 when he declared he was not a drug user when buying a gun.

“We have, within the week, pictures of him smoking crack cocaine and with a meth pipe in his mouth,” Mr Ziegler said.

According to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives lying on the form is a felony of up to 10 years in federal prison.

Documents found on the laptop also showed, according to Mr Ziegler, Hunter Biden broke other laws including using pimps for prostitution.

“Well, apart from just solicitation and prostitution, there are dozens of drug deals,” he said.

“[The US] prohibits moving people across state lines for the purposes of prostitution. That is a human trafficking.”

Republicans are probing whether President Biden was involved in any of his son’s overseas business deals, however no evidence has implicated him.

Mr Ziegler said the laptop reveals Mr Biden was the “chairman” of the family business deals.

“We have correspondence from Hunter with his other business partners… telling them directly that Joe is quote his chairman and Hunter will not go forward with certain business deals unless he gets signed off from his chairman,” he said.

“Basically Hunter was an unregistered international lobbyist who used his father’s position in the US government to then tell the oligarchs ‘hey, I can get your case in front of high level Americans’.

“Joe Biden, while vice president, was our point person if Hunter had business contracts in those countries, and he was basically for sale, meaning, If you're a foreign oligarch and you're in a pinch legally, Hey, I'm Hunter Biden. I can take your case to US ambassadors and my daddy who's the V P. And we can make your case to your own government.”

Mr Ziegler launched non-profit Marco Polo in July 2021 where he compiled the contents of the computer into the Report on the Hunter Biden Laptop so the public could “make up their own mind” about the Biden family.

https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/united-states/out-of-a-novel-hunter-bidens-laptop-laden-with-sex-drugs-and-shady-deals-exposed/news-story/0bcc0a2131bb24d0cf64abb24e923d49

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf0NwQyiWko

https://marcopolousa.org/bidenlaptopreport/

https://marcopolousa.org/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010860

File: 845cb08d57419db⋯.jpg (85.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

File: abc3093d481fd2d⋯.jpg (134.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_leaving_t….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Brittany Higgins’s elusive iCloud password delayed police completing brief of evidence for DPP

KRISTIN SHORTEN - JUNE 15, 2023

1/2

The investigation into Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation faced repeated delays because police could not access her cloud drives, which detectives believed contained potentially crucial evidence including emails and photos.

New documents released by the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system reveal that senior detectives were desperate to access Ms Higgins’ iCloud account as they worked to complete their brief of evidence for the Director of Public Prosecutions in mid-2021. But after finally gaining access, weeks later, the material they sought was not there.

Files notes made by ACT ­Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates, tendered to the inquiry, also reveal that Ms Yates requested Finance Minister Katy Gallagher’s former adviser Emma Webster be allowed to act as a second support person for Ms Higgins at court during Bruce Lehrmann’s trial in October.

Exhibits published by the inquiry reveal repeated attempts by police to obtain photos Ms Higgins took on the night of the alleged rape, as well as emails between her and Mr Lehrmann.

On June 3, 2021, Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman emailed Ms Yates seeking access to Ms Higgins’ iCloud account.

“Following up from our recent engagement with Brittany on 26 May 2021, investigators require the following to assist the investigation,” he wrote.

“Brittany’s iCloud password, as discussed with her when we last met. The passwords Brittany provided on the day are incorrect, and Brittany did mention they may be old ones or similar.

“Investigators require access and as such request Brittany provide us with current passwords.”

Ms Yates then called Mr Sharaz to pass on the request to Ms Higgins before forwarding the detective’s email.

On June 8, Ms Yates emailed Inspector Boorman, who was the crime manager of ACT Policing’s Major Crime unit, saying she hoped to provide him with an update soon. “Brittany is willing to provide this, she is just in the process of ascertaining the correct password,” Ms Yates wrote.

Mr Sharaz then texted Ms Yates, saying: “Britt concerned about providing an iCloud password. Concerned re privacy.”

Ms Yates texted Ms Higgins asking if she would like to discuss her concerns but received no response. On June 10, Mr Sharaz called Ms Yates but the notes made of their call have been redacted. She then tries to call Ms Higgins who does not answer, before calling Inspector Boorman.

“Don’t want to presume what she’s thinking, but in effort to try and move things forward, conscious that one possibility is that she’s feeling stuck,” Ms Yates says.

“Doesn’t want to stand in the way of the investigation, but is hesitant about handing over iCloud password in terms of the significant personal material available – including material about loved ones.

“Bulk of this material won’t be relevant to investigations.”

Ms Yates then tries to negotiate with the senior cop “whether there’s any other way for us to go about this” that will help police “get the info they need” while protecting Ms Higgins’s privacy.

Ms Yates then exchanged calls and texts with Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz. The content of these communications has been redacted.

On June 14, 2021 Boorman emailed Ms Yates saying that police needed full access to Ms Higgins’ iCloud account.

“From the outset of the investigation Brittany was informed of the investigation process and that these types of investigations can be quite invasive and this is unavoidable in sexual assault investigations,” he wrote.

“In addition I have been advise investigators explained to Brittany a number of times that any delay in accessing data or undertaking mobile phone examinations has the potential to decrease the evidentiary value in these matters; however, it is the right of any victim to decide whether or not they will permit police to undertake any such examinations.

“I have conversed with the investigation team regarding how or what we may do to alleviate Brittany’s privacy concerns and unfortunately investigators require full access to all electronic data for the purpose of identifying relevant evidence in relation to a matter and again any restriction in access has the potential to inhibit the investigation and /or investigation outcome.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010862

File: 08342c15f87cb81⋯.jpg (185.72 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Brittany_Higgins_outside_t….jpg)

File: 2a583fbf39d5543⋯.jpg (108.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_Emma_….jpg)

>>19010860

2/2

Insp Boorman said police were “at a significant point in the investigation process” and that they required a response, in writing, as soon as possible.

A couple of days later Ms Yates emailed Boorman telling him that Ms Higgins was seeking legal advice about providing her iCloud password to police.

“To confirm, I understand Ms Higgins is anxious to ensure your team can access the information they need, but also that any reasonable privacy measures that can be put in place are considered, noting she has had the phone/iCloud account for much of her adult life, and that the account includes substantial information that is not relevant to the current investigation,” she wrote.

“I have been advised this morning that Ms Higgins has sought the advice of lawyer Mr Leon Zwier … who would like to speak with you this morning on behalf of Ms Higgins in relation to identifying a way forward.”

In the following week there was constant communication between Ms Yates and Mr Sharaz, which has all been redacted.

On June 21 Ms Yates recorded notes from a phone call with Mr Sharaz during which she told him that the timeframe for the police providing their brief of evidence to the DPP “will depend on settlement of iCloud issue”.

“If iCloud material is sourced quite quickly – may only be another week or so before remainder of brief is provided,” she wrote.

On July 27 Ms Higgins provided police with the correct password to her iCloud account via email.

A police officer investigating Ms Higgins’ rape claim, Senior Constable Emma Frizzell, last month told the Sofronoff inquiry that investigators could never obtain crucial photos Ms Higgins took the night she alleges Mr Lehrmann raped her because, by the time police accessed her iCloud account, they were gone.

Supt Moller also told the inquiry that they wanted to obtain Ms Higgins showed the detectives a photo of a “drink at a bar which she alleged was taken on the night of the alleged incident”.

Supt Moller said it was significant to the investigation because the metadata attached to the photo could give important information.

“Unfortunately, we were not able to retrieve that photo by any other means after she had shown us so the only people that had seen that photo were myself, Marcus Boorman and Ms Yates,” he said.

Hundreds of communications between Mr Sharaz and Ms Yates, contained in exhibits tendered at the inquiry, have been redacted for reasons which are unclear.

The documents also reveal that in September Ms Yates asked the DPP to make an application for Ms Higgins to have Ms Webster in the courtroom whilst the complainant was giving evidence.

“As you are aware, Ms Higgins has requested that I attend as a support person, in my professional capacity as the Victims of Crime Commissioner,” Ms Yates wrote.

“Ms Higgins also requests the support of Ms Emma Webster who is a long-term friend.”

Sarah Pitney from the ODPP told Ms Yates that would not be possible.

“Unfortunately in light of previous exchanges between Ms Webster and Brittany contained in the Cellebrite report, counsel is of the view that Ms Webster may not be an appropriate support person,” she wrote.

“Of course, Ms Webster would still be welcome to attend with David and provide support throughout the day outside of the courtroom.”

Ms Webster, a top Labor Party operative and lobbyist, accompanied Higgins to court each day that she attended Mr Lehrmann’s trial.

The 29-year-old’s trial was sensationally aborted in October due to juror misconduct and immediately listed for a retrial in February, before being abandoned altogether. Mr Lehrmann maintains that he is innocent.

The Board of Inquiry’s public hearings into the handling of Ms Higgins’s rape allegation and Mr Lehrmann’s prosecution have been adjourned. The findings of its chair, Walter Sofronoff KC, are due on July 31.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-explains-leg-bruise-injury-photo-date-discrepancy/news-story/1fc0779ab01f2c99422e22cb9475a29d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010879

File: 66ebfdfba9495fa⋯.jpg (107.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_leaves_th….jpg)

File: c337b3e0a6bc5ea⋯.jpg (200.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,40_years_of_economic_loss_….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

40 years of economic loss, end to political career reasons for Brittany Higgins $2.5m payout

JANET ALBRECHTSEN, ELLIE DUDLEY and RHIANNON DOWN - JUNE 15, 2023

1/2

Brittany Higgins claimed up to 40 years’ worth of economic loss and the end of her pursuit of a ­future political career were among the reasons she was due more than $2.5m in compensation from the government after allegedly being raped, a draft statement of claim has revealed.

The revelations came as ­Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus refused to answer questions over Ms Higgins’ multi-million-dollar payout, which was provided without the consultation of former senior Liberal ministers at the centre of her claims.

The draft statement of claim, obtained by The Australian, ­preceded up to $3m in taxpayer-funded compensation being given to Ms Higgins.

The draft claim was delivered to the commonwealth, former prime minister Scott Morrison and Liberal senators Linda Reynolds and Michaelia Cash as ­respondents in March 2022, just as the statute of limitations on some of the claims was due to expire.

The document stated Ms Higgins was “successful and progressing in her career”. However prospects of her own political triumphs were quashed after she was allegedly raped by fellow former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann in the office of the former defence minister, Senator Reynolds.

“The claimant had a reasonable expectation of being promoted regularly and to eventually pursue her own political career, before suffering from the injuries and disabilities,” the document states.

Ms Higgins was “diagnosed as medically unfit for any form of ­employment, and has been given a very poor prognosis for future ­employment” following the incident. She was therefore due $2,521,314.40 in economic loss, it states.

The document, dated March 29 last year, claimed Ms Higgins had “not been engaged in any form of employment” since February 8, 2021, except for one day, after she resigned from her politics staffer role. The $2.5m figure was tallied based on Ms Higgins’ 2021 salary over a 40-year period, less 15 per cent to account for any changes in circumstances ($1.5m). It also factored in an expectation that she would be remunerated at an ­increasing rate over that period (an additional $1m).

“The claimant further claims for the likelihood that she would have succeeded in either progressing in the public service, politics or in the private sector and would have been remunerated at increasing rates,” the draft claim reads.

“If the matter proceeds, the claimant will obtain a forensic ­accounting report, but anticipates that this part of the claim for future economic loss will be in order of at least an additional $1,000,000.”

Ms Higgins blamed Senator Reynolds, Senator Cash and Mr Morrison for mishandling her rape allegations, exacerbating a “toxic and harmful” work environment, subjecting her to “victimisation, ostracism” and pressuring her not to discuss the assault or their response to it.

The Australian understands Mr Morrison, Senator Cash, Senator Reynolds and the commonwealth received copies of Ms Higgins’ draft claim, and Mr ­Morrison’s name was removed from Ms Higgins’ claim. No claim was ever filed to a court and was therefore never made public or contested in court.

Ms Higgins claimed she was subject to “damaging conduct” from the three Liberal MPs and the commonwealth, accusing them of failing to provide appropriate support following her ­alleged assault or to launch an ­immediate investigation into the matter.

She also accused them of workplace bullying and harassment, and failing to “implement remedial measures to assist the claimant continuing to work at the workplace following the assault”.

Since March 2021, Ms Higgins worked as the media Adviser for the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria – a job she obtained with the assistance of her partner David Sharaz and his friend, former Labor Adviser, Emma Webster. She was also an interim media ­Adviser with the Queensland Human Rights Commission, according to her LinkedIn profile.

Ms Higgins was appointed a ­visiting fellow at the Australian National University Global Institute for Women’s Leadership at the end of 2021.

She is currently writing a book that will “shine a light on the toxic workplace culture of parliament”, and has this year teamed up with Ms Webster to launch a new company called Power Blazers Pty Ltd. The purpose of Power Blazers Pty Ltd is unclear.

In the draft statement of claim, Ms Higgins claimed an additional $400,000 in compensation because of the “distress and humiliation” caused by the behaviour of Senator Reynolds, Senator Cash and Mr Morrison in handling her allegations.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010880

File: c0ac7fc3be92e33⋯.jpg (126.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mark_Dreyfus_during_Questi….jpg)

File: 8c7b0ece187b27b⋯.jpg (70.49 KB,768x1024,3:4,Senator_Linda_Reynolds.jpg)

File: 0ca48acf400e62d⋯.jpg (100.05 KB,768x1024,3:4,Senator_Michaelia_Cash.jpg)

>>19010879

2/2

“The claimant’s hurt, distress and humiliation has been exacerbated as a result of the manner in which the individual respondents behaved at the time of the assault and during the subsequent handling of the matter, as well as a result of the toxic and harmful culture and work environment that the claimant was subjected to by the respondents,” the document read.

Ms Higgins also accused Senator Reynolds, Senator Cash and Mr Morrison of making public statements about her assault, and disclosing her personal information to “third parties without her consent”.

Last year The Australian ­revealed the Albanese government muzzled Senator Reynolds in her defence against the multi-million-dollar lawsuit, threatening to tear up an agreement to pay her legal fees and any costs awarded unless she agreed not to attend mediation.

Senator Reynolds was determined to defend herself against Ms Higgins’ allegations but in correspondence obtained by The Australian, the commonwealth’s lawyers told her she could not take part in the mediation.

She was therefore unable to dispute any of Ms Higgins’ allegations about a failure to support her or properly investigate the incident, some of which were contested by both Senator Reynolds and her then chief of staff Fiona Brown at Mr Lehrmann’s trial.

The Australian understands Senator Cash was also sent a letter muzzling her and instructing her not to attend the mediation in return for her legal fees being paid by the commonwealth.

Neither Senator Reynolds nor Senator Cash was asked for evidence that contested Ms Higgins’ claims. Senator Reynolds gave evidence that Ms Higgins told her during a meeting on April 1, 2019, she had been very drunk and woke in a state of distress after the incident on March 23 but did not say she had been sexually assaulted.

Ms Brown said Ms Higgins told her during a meeting on March 28 that she remembered “him (Mr Lehrmann) being on top of me” and on April 1 was offered support and encouraged to speak with AFP officers located in Parliament House by both Ms Brown and Senator Reynolds in accordance with oral and written advice given by the Department of Finance.

Mr Dreyfus on Wednesday declined to answer a list of 10 detailed questions from The Australian about the circumstances surrounding the payout, how the figure was estimated and if legal advice on the claim was sought.

“Ms Higgins’ claim was managed consistently with the commonwealth’s obligations under the Legal Services Directions 2017,” a spokesman for Mr Dreyfus said. “The terms of settlement and the claim was managed in accordance with legal principle and practice and informed by external legal advice. The commonwealth cannot provide any further comment on the specifics of the claim or settlement.”

Former Coalition staffer ­Rachelle Miller was paid $650,000 in her settlement with the federal government, after alleging former education minister Alan Tudge was physically abusive towards her while they were having an ­affair. Mr Tudge has always denied the allegations and no admission of liability was made by the government in settling the claim.

Law Partners Personal Injury Lawyers principal lawyer Chantille Khoury said the figure awarded to Ms Higgins was “unusually high” and estimated her case would typically be paid out up to $500,000 depending on the case.

Ms Khoury said she believed Ms Higgins’ claim would have been logged under the Sexual Discrimination Act as Comcare claims were capped at $160,000.

“It is highly unusual given the publicity around it they wanted to circumvent that pretty quickly; it’s a larger sum of money, more than I’ve ever heard of,” she said.

“It really depends on the age of the person. The younger the person, the longer they have to live with the pain and suffering as a result of what has happened, this one is pretty high but the (Rachelle Miller) case seems more realistic in terms of a person of her age.”

Barrister David Edwardson said there had been a lack of transparency around Ms Higgins’ payout, adding that it was worthy of investigation by the National Anti-Corruption Commission in order to “clear the air” even if everything had been above board.

“I have no idea as to how a determination was made that any money should be paid let alone the amount that has been bandied around in the public domain,” Mr Edwardson said.

“That’s the problem, I think everyone would like to know: the circumstances of this political fiasco, whether proper procedure and protocol was followed, and whether the amount that was ultimately paid was justified.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/40-years-of-economic-loss-end-to-political-career-reasons-for-brittany-higgins-25m-compensation-payment/news-story/0f085e5766cb75fa82f09b30d7df8f2f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010895

File: c418566e15360b7⋯.jpg (108.46 KB,1280x720,16:9,Finance_Minister_Katy_Gall….jpg)

File: 03d3d21e4f3ee80⋯.jpg (139.4 KB,1024x768,4:3,David_Sharaz_and_Katy_Gall….jpg)

File: 8f77fa53339a63e⋯.jpg (120.47 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: c67d657f86a9b8f⋯.jpg (155.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Katy Gallagher was invited to wedding of David Sharaz

GEOFF CHAMBERS and SARAH ISON - JUNE 15, 2023

Katy Gallagher has confirmed that Brittany Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz invited her to attend his first wedding in 2018, as senior Labor ministers hid behind parliamentary procedural tactics to dodge questions about when they first became aware of the Higgins rape allegations.

The Finance Minister came under fire for a second consecutive day in question time over her relationship with Mr Sharaz, involvement in Ms Higgins’ reported $3m payout, and who contacted her prior to the sexual abuse allegations airing on The Project in February 2021.

The Left-faction powerbroker and confidante of Anthony Albanese attempted to distance herself from text messages sent by Mr Sharaz to Ms Higgins claiming her as an “old friend”.

Senator Gallagher – who has known Mr Sharaz for more than a decade – described her relationship with the former political journalist as “professional”.

Asked about her invitation to Mr Sharaz’s wedding to former wife Alexandra Craig, Senator Gallagher said: “I didn’t recall that until I heard it reported and I had to ask the people I worked with at the time.”

The Minister for Women said “I think I was (ACT) chief minister”, but she quit that job in 2014 to enter the Senate.

“I got a lot of invitations to a lot of things, some I was able to go to and others I weren’t. I didn’t attend that one. The invitation was declined,” she told parliament.

In response to Mr Sharaz describing her as an “old friend”, Senator Gallagher said: “I’m not responsible for how people describe their relationship with me.”

In the House of Representatives, the Prime Minister said “no” when asked by Peter Dutton whether Senator Gallagher had misled the Senate in claiming that she did not alert senior colleagues about information she received about Ms Higgins’ alleged sexual assault.

Following intervention by leader of the house Tony Burke, Speaker of the house Milton Dick ruled a question from deputy ­opposition leader Sussan Ley to ­Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek as out of order.

Ms Ley had asked Ms Plibersek – who along with Mr Albanese was named in text messages sent between Mr Sharaz and Ms Higgins – when she “first became aware” of the rape allegations broadcast by The Project.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong backed-in Senator Gallagher’s claim she did not inform her staff or senior colleagues about what she knew prior to the rape allegations becoming public.

“Her account is correct. She kept her confidence in the information she was provided, including with me,” Senator Wong said.

The Australian understands senior Coalition figures are approaching the prosecution of senior government ministers care­fully, concerned about overreach and potential backlash against the Liberal Party, which is focused on winning back female voters.

The parliamentary battle came as Ms Higgins tweeted transcripts of recorded conversations with her former boss, then attorney-general Michaelia Cash and her chief of staff Daniel Try, on Wednesday following another bitter question time in the Senate.

Ms Higgins posted photographs of notes from a conversation she allegedly had with Senator Cash and Mr Try in “early February 2021”.

The conversation appears to be in relation to Ms Higgins’ allegations.

“Please know that Daniel and I are here to support you,” Ms Cash is recorded as saying. “Britt, do you want to go to the police?”

Senator Cash said these tweets were consistent with the evidence she gave last year.

“The issue of when Senator Cash became aware of the allegations was the subject of evidence given under oath and has been tested in the ACT Supreme Court,” a spokesman told The Australian on Wednesday evening.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/katy-gallagher-was-invited-to-wedding-of-david-sharaz/news-story/a2468a82134ef341919fd6f6dc133f52

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010904

File: d90a01629384269⋯.jpg (137.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Labor_senator_Katy_Gallagh….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Labor’s grotesque hypocrisy appears to know no bounds

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - JUNE 15, 2023

For political chutzpah, senior Labor MPs who weaponised a rape allegation win hands down. This week in the federal parliament, Australians were treated to one of the more grotesque displays of political hypocrisy, subterfuge and trickery.

The same politicians who weaponised a rape allegation for their own brute political purposes are now in high dudgeon about the public exposure of material that points to the extent of Labor’s involvement in this scandal.

This newspaper revealed texts that suggested, among other things, that Katy Gallagher received a transcript of The Project interview before it aired. Publishing that text meant we know now that Gallagher was sought out by David Sharaz and Brittany Higgins about the rape allegation – even before questions were put by The Project to people portrayed as the chief villains: Bruce Lehrmann, Linda Reynolds and her former chief of staff Fiona Brown.

Having received private material for political purposes, Gallagher is outraged that text messages revealed both her involvement and that she apparently misled parliament.

It doesn’t matter how many people lined up behind the senator, at the Prime Minister’s urging, to declare her integrity.

In this episode, Gallagher has questions to answer that go directly to integrity. A person can give $100 to a homeless person and mislead parliament, all in the same day. The former does not cancel the latter.

The Attorney-General’s theatrical outrage over leaked texts is equally brazen. If Mark Dreyfus is planning to ban the future publication of material such as that obtained by this newspaper about political collusion, he will need to carve out a couple of exceptions. Let’s call them the Brittany Exceptions – where there is a public interest in disclosure, then Australians have a right to know. In this case, they have a right to know the inner workings of how a rape allegation was weaponised by a political party to the detriment of the criminal justice system. There ought to be another exception for cases where a complainant deliberately uses the media over the justice system.

This newspaper didn’t publish private salacious material shared between Higgins and Sharaz. We published material that went to the heart of the country’s biggest scandal: the weaponisation of a rape allegation for political purposes; the deliberate strategy by a complainant to go to the media first, police second, which had the effect of trashing the presumption of innocence; the continuing public media trial by everyone from then prime minister Scott Morrison to DPP Shane Drumgold to Higgins and her media support group. And then, the payment of reportedly millions of dollars to Higgins in a process where egregious allegations against Linda Reynolds were not contested. Indeed, Reynolds was muzzled by Labor’s Attorney-General who threatened to tear up an agreement to pay her legal fees and any costs awarded unless she agreed not to attend a mediation.

Though it seemed impossible, the stench of this tawdry saga ­increased this week. Labor wants material that exposes their highly questionable behaviour hidden. In other words, they would ban the publication of material that points to their own political collusion in this scandal.

That won’t end well for the nation. Changing the Privacy Act to stop the publication of the sort of material this newspaper exposed will only allow this sort of scandal to happen again – and guarantee that it can happen in secret.

Right now, it may suit Labor’s political future to restrict media freedom. One day, inevitably, the tables will be turned, and potential wrongdoing involving their opponents will need to be revealed.

Labor’s confected outrage this week, and their default instinct to clamp down on media freedom to save themselves from scrutiny over a matter of public importance, has made two things clear.

First, private material in the public interest should be made public in the right circumstances, unless there are obvious national security issues at stake.

Second, power is dangerous in the hands of the shortsighted and the shameless.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/labors-grotesque-hypocrisy-appears-to-know-no-bounds/news-story/7461483d231ec136d3203156f58ca7c2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010931

File: 3d3d5f676719a27⋯.jpg (138.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Gallagher_must_come_clean_….jpg)

File: 0dc458f85570915⋯.jpg (95.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_during_Qu….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Gallagher must come clean for the sake of the Albanese government

CAMERON MILNER - JUNE 15, 2023

1/2

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has finally admitted she had prior knowledge of the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins, so why is it now good enough simply to take her word that she didn’t then weaponise the information?

A thorough and independent inquiry needs to be held into whether Gallagher crossed the line.

In the same Senate hearing where she denied any prior knowledge – thus potentially misleading parliament – she had already weaponised the accusation.

Why else did senator Linda Reynolds precede Gallagher’s and Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s denials with the line, “Oh, so you want to discuss this here and now, in public”?

Gallagher appears to have been so keen to be fitting in with her new pals, Wong and former senator Kristina Keneally, she forgot entirely the duty of care she had to Higgins. Scoring political points against Reynolds takes all the skill of clubbing a baby seal.

Anthony Albanese will stick to Gallagher for as long as possible. Once Gallagher falls, then his even closer ally Wong similarly comes under pressure to step aside. The question for Labor was, did the party’s Senate leadership help themselves politically instead of protecting solely the interests of Higgins and her achieving justice?

There’s no doubt in the dark days of opposition Albanese took comfort in the adoration of his Senate leadership team of Wong, Keneally and Gallagher.

They might have been his loudest cheer squad outwardly, but what we are now seeing after the revelations about Gallagher and Higgins’s fiance David Sharaz’s political plotting is something much more concerning.

We know already the Prime Minister’s fan club took it on themselves to be enforcers. Treating fellow senators like mushrooms and in the case of senator Kimberley Kitching allegedly engaging in coercive control and bullying. Little wonder they were also known as the “mean girls”. What an independent inquiry needs to find out is whether they also chose to weaponise a criminal allegation.

We all know the more recent history of the three key players. Wong is Labor’s leader in the Senate and has never faced an investigation into bullying. Keneally was booted out after running a scandal-riddled NSW government.

She then went on to become a campaign bus captain and loser of the once-safe Labor seat of Fowler. Keneally broke recently from time on Scotland Island to announce what we all knew – her time in politics is at an end.

The collective sigh of a long-suffering NSW public was audible.

Gallagher is Albanese’s Finance Minister while being a willing Sharaz whisperer and, according to Sharaz’s text to Higgins, was said to be “fully invested now ha ha”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010933

File: 0e8438c926d5264⋯.jpg (129.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Labor_senators_Katy_Gallag….jpg)

File: ba9f74458891f09⋯.jpg (121.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_with_her_….jpg)

>>19010931

2/2

The issue Albanese faces with Gallagher goes to the heart of the “new politics” he promised when in opposition.

To be fair, Albanese also promised cheaper electricity and hasn’t delivered. He also promised cost-of-living relief, and aren’t we all feeling that promise being delivered, after the 11th interest-rate rise on his watch, and still no end in sight for punishing inflation.

The issue of ministerial integrity, though, is very much within the Prime Minister’s complete control.

Gallagher is looking tricky. The evidence tendered in court and covered clearly in The Australian shows Sharaz boasted of his close relationship to Gallagher and of her being an “old friend” before any publication of the allegations.

What is particularly damning, however, is that Sharaz also says he briefed Gallagher in detail as to what Higgins would eventually say publicly about the alleged rape in Reynolds’s office. Gallagher can’t stonewall forever, nor should the Prime Minister have his good name tarnished.

Labor’s best performers, Tanya Plibersek and Jim Chalmers, are out there using their good names to try to clear Gallagher’s.

Instead, what Gallagher should do is release all her texts with Sharaz, as well as stand down while an independent inquiry is held into her actions.

Labor is in overdrive hoping this all goes away, when instead Gallagher should just do what’s best for the Labor Party and her Prime Minister.

What the public deserves – and for the sake of Albanese’s own reputation – is a similar level of sunlight shone on Gallagher’s actions. Did she or did she not seek to gain political advantage from an alleged rape in Reynolds’s office?

What seemed to have been forgotten by all the sorry actors in this sordid affair is that there was a criminal matter that needed to be tried. A rape was alleged and the victim and the accused deserved their day in court.

Neither now have that closure. Both have been let down by a prosecutor and process that is itself under intense judicial scrutiny by Walter Sofronoff KC.

Albanese would be well served by outing the truth and let Gallagher clear her name lest this does lasting damage to his own standing as Prime Minister.

Labor was elected on a small-target policy platform and a solemn promise to deliver a better level of politics than under the Coalition and Scott Morrison.

Now is the time for Albanese and Labor, however inconvenient it is, to honour that commitment to the electorate.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/gallagher-must-come-clean-for-the-sake-of-the-albanese-government/news-story/d167bd324be33ee45515de12d85e94c2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010942

File: 26a2ed65502bc91⋯.mp4 (3.89 MB,592x324,148:81,iwYttY6_Nklcnlvk.mp4)

File: 60a60ce3eea32c8⋯.jpg (96.33 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Reynolds_became_em….jpg)

File: 3494796f4935fc2⋯.jpg (99.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Linda_Reynolds_in_the_sena….jpg)

File: f0600ac86990e23⋯.jpg (97.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Michaelia_Cash_and….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Katy Gallagher apologises to Linda Reynolds over ‘hurt’ amid Brittany Higgins saga

JENNA CLARKE and COURTNEY GOULD - JUNE 15, 2023

Katy Gallagher has apologised to fellow senator Linda Reynolds for any hurt she endured during the protracted attention around Brittany Higgins’ alleging she was raped in her office in 2019. Claims which were dismissed by the ACT Supreme Court last year.

“I’m sorry as Ms Reynolds is clearly upset about what happened to her,” she said.

Senator Gallagher’s voice cracked and tears welled during day four of intense scrutiny from the coalition during Senate question time over her involvement and relationship with Ms Higgins and her partner David Sharaz.

Senator Gallagher said she would have happily endured “this type of questioning” but was concerned for the toll the issue is having on women around the country.

The Finance Minister said she was disappointed by the week’s debate as the Coalition continued its attack on the Labor frontbencher about what she knew before Ms Higgins went public.

“I am very disappointed that this week, the work that we’ve done on (Sex Discrimination Commissioner Kate) Jenkins, on Respect at Work, on asking women to come forward when something happens to them and then treating women the way they are being treated right now,” Senator Gallagher told parliament.

“I am sorry Senator Reynolds is clearly upset about what happened to her.

“And I told her that … but I am also very sorry for Brittany Higgins, I’m sorry documents about her personal life have been leaked.

“I’m sorry a confidential draft claim for compensation found its way onto the front pages of a national newspaper.”

Senator Gallagher’s answer came as Coalition senators screamed interjections in defence of Senator Reynolds, claiming the former minister had “done everything right”.

Senator Reynolds employed both Ms Higgins and the man she accused, Bruce Lehrmann, at the time of the alleged incident in 2019.

Mr Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to one charge of sexual assault. His criminal trial was aborted last year due to jury misconduct.

The charge and a plan to retry him was dropped in December due to fears of Ms Higgins mental health.

Senator Gallagher has been under pressure after leaked text messages suggested Ms Higgins’ partner David Sharaz had given her a tip off about Ms Higgins’ interview with The Project in the days before it aired.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese backed Senator Gallagher again on Thursday, telling parliament he had “absolute confidence” in his Finance Minister.

Earlier in the week, Senator Gallagher denied misleading the Senate while in opposition in 2021 when by declaring “no one had any knowledge” of the allegation prior to its publication.

During her fourth day of questioning, voice cracked as she choked back tears as was accused of not being able to answer “basic factual questions”.

She rejected suggestions Labor sought to weaponise the allegation for political gain.

Asked if Labor sought advice on whether any of their questioning at the time could have “damaged any prospect of conviction”, Senator Gallagher said they followed party process.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/katy-gallagher-apologises-to-linda-reynolds-over-hurt-amid-brittany-higgins-saga/news-story/22fd221b1afd76d41d9b7c7642536a4f

https://twitter.com/jennamclarke/status/1669206931897225216

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010951

File: 1207a5b99c8f1b4⋯.jpg (140.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,Independent_senator_Lidia_….jpg)

>>19005499

‘Take it to the police’: David Van responds to Lidia Thorpe claims

SARAH ISON - JUNE 15, 2023

Victorian Liberal senator David Van has told Lidia Thorpe to go to the police if she believes, as she has claimed, that he sexually assaulted her.

The independent senator on Wednesday performed an ­extraordinary backdown in parliament, withdrawing her accusation hours earlier that Mr Van had “harassed and sexually assaulted” her when his party was in government.

Senator Van said Senator Thorpe’s accusations were “just awful,” telling 2GB the allegations were “Just terrible for me and my family.”

“The only time I’ve ever even touched her was shaking her hand after her maiden speech.

“Nothing else, that’s for sure,” he said.

He added: “I’m not going to say a bad word against Lidia, but if she has any belief that anything’s happened, I’d encourage her to take it to the police.”

The former Greens senator on Wednesday branded Senator Van a “perpetrator” in the upper house while he was ­speaking on the need for more respect within the parliamentary workplace and criticising Labor for its treatment of Liberal women, including senators Michaelia Cash and Linda Reynolds, over the Brittany ­Higgins saga.

“I’m feeling really uncomfortable when a perpetrator is speaking about violence,” Senator Thorpe said.

“This person harassed me, ­sexually assaulted me and the (former) prime minister had to ­remove him from his office, and to have him talking about this today is an absolute disgrace on the whole party.”

The Australian understands Senator Van was moved from his office, which was near Senator Thorpe’s suite, after she made a complaint about his behaviour.

Senator Thorpe withdrew her allegations in the upper house just hours later and said she would have more to say on the matter on Thursday.

No police complaint has ever been made about the alleged ­incident.

Before Senator Thorpe’s withdrawal, Senator Van hit back at her spray, which he called a ­“disgusting statement” that he ­“utterly rejected”.

“It is just a lie and I reject it,” Senator Van said.

He then withdrew his accusation that Senator Thorpe had told “a lie” and rephrased it as “it’s just not true”.

Following the incident in the upper house, Senator Van revealed that his lawyers had made contact with Senator Thorpe.

“In the chamber today, Senator Thorpe made unfounded and completely untrue allegations against me that I immediately and unequivocally denied and continue to deny,” Senator Van said in a statement.

“These outrageous and reprehensible comments were made by Senator Thorpe using parliamentary privilege in the most ­malicious and despicable way.

“My lawyers have written to her already making my position clear in the strongest possible terms.”

A spokesman for Scott Morrison, the prime minister at the time of the alleged incident, said Mr Morrison had no recollection of Senator Thorpe ever making such an allegation to him personally, nor of any involvement in Senator Van’s office arrangements.

The spat follows a heated parliamentary sitting week in which the Brittany Higgins scandal dominated both houses, with Labor MPs warning the Coalition its line of attack would make women less likely to report assault, while Liberals accused the government of hypocrisy.

Labor in 2021 grilled the Morrison government over its handling of Ms Higgins’ allegation, but it has defended its attacks at the time because they led to an improvement of workplace culture through the Jenkins report.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/lidia-thorpe-drops-sexual-assault-claim-made-in-senate/news-story/219bce86bae52faa8d0c06c5236e9f70

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010988

File: 9a2c665724effad⋯.jpg (207.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_David_Van_on_a_tri….jpg)

File: 2834f2f2aa4aa85⋯.jpg (132.89 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Ousted_Liberal_senator_Dav….jpg)

>>19005499

Liberal Senator David Van was accused by Lidia Thorpe of harassment, here’s what we know about him

SARAH ISON - JUNE 15, 2023

1/2

A former public affairs consultant from Victoria, ousted Liberal senator David Van was thrown into the spotlight when independent Lidia Thorpe used parliamentary privilege to accuse him of harassment and sexual assault.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on Thursday afternoon said further allegations had emerged about Senator Van and had “advised Senator Van of my decision that he should no longer sit in the Liberal Party party room.”

Senator Thorpe on Thursday spoke of how she had faced “sexual comments” and had been “inappropriately propositioned” in corridors and stairwells of parliament house in an emotional speech to the Senate. “One man followed me and cornered me in a stairwell,” she said. “To me, it was sexual assault and the government of the time recognised it as such.”

Despite withdrawing her statement about Senator Van in the Senate within a matter of hours on Wednesday, her spray and claims he was a “perpetrator” raised a question onlookers are still asking: who is he?

Senator Van, who has strenuously denied Senator Thope’s allegations calling them “untrue” and “unfounded” faced some controversy last year when he was accused of making growling noises at Senator Jacqui Lambie in the upper house, which he denied but still apologised for.

“I was just interjecting with a gruff voice and I think with the mask and everything, in all the noise that was going on, it was that,’’ he said.

Despite rejecting Senator Thorpe’s allegations, Senator Van agreed to leave the Liberal party room to ensure there was no negative impact to the Opposition in the wake of the claims.

Corporate life before politics

Before entering parliament in 2019, Senator Van worked for communications and public relations firms in Australia and the US before founding his own company – the De Wintern Group – in 2003.

In his first speech, Senator Van paid tribute to the “wonderful women” in his life, which included his three sisters, who he grew up with in what he called an “ideal” childhood.

“I am fortunate that I don’t have a ‘log cabin’ story. My childhood was ideal and I wish all children experienced the wonderful childhood I had,” he said in 2019.

“My life has always been full of the most wonderful women. My sisters Kristine, Lisa and Madeleine and my niece Lucia have given me so much joy and I love them all very much.”

Senator Van also paid tribute to his “life partner” Nerilee who he thanked for standing by him as he entered parliament.

“She is one of Australia’s most talented corporate women and I admire how she has never let gender get in the way of her success even while working in a male dominated industry,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19010991

File: 3eb28270be06366⋯.jpg (161.78 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Senator_David_Van_and_form….jpg)

>>19010988

2/2

Ukraine controversy

While relatively unknown, the Victorian senator made news in his home state for flying to Ukraine last year despite travel advice urging Australians not to visit the war-torn nation.

“I’ve been privileged this week to meet the Ukrainian people, their government and their defence forces, who are the bravest people I’ve ever met,” he said at the time.

The trip raised eyebrows not only because it defined travel advice, but because it was funded by drone company, DefendTex, which Senator Van spruiked upon his return without mentioning the organisation had paid for his Ukraine visit.

Senator Van first met DefendTex chief executive, Travis Reddy, in 2019 when he and then defence industry Minister Melissa Price awarded the company a $2mn innovation grant.

The Victorian senator declared in his register of interests that DefendTex Ltd had paid for his travel to Ukraine in August 2022, and told The Australian earlier this year he had “done everything I need to do” in disclosing the matter.

A member of parliamentary committees including the joint statutory committee on human rights and the senate select committee on foreign interference through social media, Senator Van is vocal on matters of foreign affairs and in March last year completed a Masters of international and national security studies at Monash University.

Thorpe’s allegations, since withdrawn

Senator Van has confirmed he did move offices after Senator Thorpe made a complaint against him in 2021.

At the time, Senator Thorpe had made complaints to Greens leadership, who had communicated with the Liberal Party, that Senator Van’s behaviour was making her “uncomfortable”.

On Wednesday, Senator Thorpe told the chamber she was “feeling really uncomfortable when a perpetrator is speaking about violence”.

“This person harassed me, sexually assaulted me, and the prime minister had to remove him from his office,” she said.

Senator Van immediately told the chamber it “is simply not true”, labelling it a “disgusting statement”.

‘I’m hurting so bad’

Speaking to 2GB radio on Thursday ahead of stepping down, Senator Van said the allegations were “completely unfounded”, and he was “shocked” by Senator Thorpe’s claim.

When asked whether he had ever sexually assaulted her, Senator Van said “absolutely no”.

“It’s absolutely disgusting that she would say those words … I mean, it’s so far from any fact.

“I’m hurting so badly.”

However Senator Van also said he wanted to “put on the record” he had taken up an offer from then-senate president Scott Ryan to move his office further away from Senator Thorpe’s following a complaint.

He said Senator Thorpe had “made allegations to our leadership through her leadership that I was following her into the chamber, which made her feel uncomfortable”.

“That was just the way that we call into the chamber when there are divisions,” he said.

“And at times, I’ve been in front of her, at times behind her – but at no time did I harass her or touch her. I barely even said hello.

“ … And so the leadership offered me another office.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/liberal-senator-david-van-was-accused-by-lidia-thorpe-of-harassment-heres-what-we-know-about-him/news-story/1e4322a5bee55d18ad4dbbef3b3f0b98

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011007

File: d46313ea06ba552⋯.jpg (93.9 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_addre….jpg)

File: ad2b2b1313c7535⋯.jpg (92.57 KB,1280x720,16:9,Victorian_Senator_David_Va….jpg)

>>19005499

Lidia Thorpe says she was propositioned and inappropriately touched in parliament

SARAH ISON - JUNE 15, 2023

Independent Lidia Thorpe has doubled down on her allegations that Liberal Senator David Van is a “perpetrator”, telling the Senate on Thursday that he was among a number of men in parliament who had made her feel “unsafe” in the building.

In a tearful address to the upper house, the former Greens senator said she had been “propositioned and inappropriately touched” in the hallways and corridors of parliament and called on the government to immediately increase the number of security guards and cameras in the building.

“As all women that have walked the corridors of this building know, it is not a safe place. You are often alone in long corridors with no windows and in stairwells hidden from view, where there are no cameras,” she told the senate.

“I experienced sexual comments and it was inappropriately propositioned by powerful men. One man followed me and cornered me in a stairwell.

“There are different understandings of what amounts to sexual assault and what I experienced has been being followed, aggressively propositioned and inappropriately touched.”

Incident occurred around same time as Higgins allegations

Senator Thorpe did not say who the man was who cornered her in the stairwell but said the alleged incident occurred in early 2021, when Brittany Higgins came forward with her allegation she was raped in parliament.

“I did not want to have anything taken away from it and her experience and her bravery in coming forward,” she said.

She confirmed she spoke to then-sex discrimination commissioner Kate Jenkins about her experiences, as part of Ms Jenkins inquiry into the culture of parliament that culminated in the Set the Standard report.

Senator Thorpe said she could “not stay silent” when Senator Van spoke about the importance of women’s safety in parliament on Wednesday, which prompted her to use parliamentary privilege to allege he had harassed and sexually assaulted her.

Senator Van has rejected all allegations made by Senator Thorpe and said nothing she said “was true”, but did not want the matter to negatively impact the Liberals and so had agreed to resign from the Party.

Peter Dutton on Thursday said he had been informed of other allegations about Senator Van overnight and had advised him to leave the party.

‘Silence is violence’

While withdrawing her allegation later that same day, Senator Thorpe on Thursday said Senator Van had made her feel unsafe.

“Silence is violence and yesterday could not stay silent as someone who has knowingly made me feel unsafe had the gall to stand up in front of parliament and preach about protecting women,” she said.

“This was not an isolated incident and there are others I could name who have inappropriately touched me, invaded my space and knowingly made me feel unsafe.”

She said she was “disappointed” by the reaction of Senator Van who, instead of “stepping up and taking accountability”, denied the allegation.

“He asked his lawyers to send a letter, the same lawyers who represented Christian Porter, this type of behaviour makes it harder for other women to come forward,” she said.

The Australian understands Senator Van was moved to a different office in parliament, to ensure he was not in proximity to Senator Thorpe.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/lidia-thorpe-says-she-was-propositioned-and-inappropriately-touched-in-parliament/news-story/91abba6248c076c1f234e56f4cdd5e54

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011031

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19005499

David Van moves to the crossbench after Thorpe’s Senate accusations

Angus Thompson and James Massola - June 15, 2023

1/2

Liberal senator David Van has been removed from the Liberal party room after a meeting with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton following accusations of harassment made by Lidia Thorpe in the Senate.

Dutton said he had met with the Victorian senator on Thursday morning after further allegations had been brought to him overnight.

“A short time ago I advised Senator Van of my decision that he should no longer sit in the Liberal party room. At the outset, I want to make clear, very clear that I’m not making any judgement on the veracity of the allegations or any individual’s guilt or innocence. I make that very clear,” Dutton said on Thursday afternoon.

The Liberal leader said he has spoken to the parliamentary workplace support service on Wednesday night and again on Thursday morning, which will independently “conduct their considerations of these matters”.

Van maintained his innocence in a statement to the Senate, but said he did not wish for the “matter to stain the Liberal Party” and accepted he would “no longer be sitting in the party room”.

In the Senate on Wednesday, Thorpe accused Van of “harassment” and “sexual assault”, a statement Van strongly denied at the time and she later withdrew the comments to comply with Senate rules.

On Thursday, the Greens-turned-independent senator made another statement to the Senate, where she alleged she was cornered by a man in parliament in a stairwell, which was witnessed by staff and other MPs. She did not identify the man.

“No one witnessed what happened in the stairwell as there are no cameras in stairwells,” Thorpe told the Senate.

In a tearful address, she said there were different understandings of what amounted to sexual assault, and that she had also experienced being followed, “aggressively propositioned and inappropriately touched”.

She did not identify any person as being responsible for that conduct.

She said she had made her remarks the day before in the context of Van making a speech in which he accused the Labor Party of disgraceful behaviour in its handling of the Brittany Higgins sexual assault allegation.

This prompted Thorpe to interject, and in an exchange with Senate Deputy President Andrew McLachlan, she said of Van, “this person harassed me, sexually assaulted me and the prime minister had to remove him from his office [to relocate Van’s office within Parliament House].”

Van rejected the allegation in the chamber, then released a statement later saying Thorpe had made “unfounded and completely untrue allegations against me that I immediately and unequivocally denied and continue to deny”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011039

File: ebc5e801062c81f⋯.jpg (152.89 KB,1024x683,1024:683,David_Van_has_been_removed….jpg)

>>19011031

2/2

Thorpe said in her statement on Thursday she didn’t go public at the time “because it was during the time Brittany Higgins had made her experience in this building public” and she didn’t want to detract from that.

She said she was afraid to walk out of the door of her office, would “check the coast was clear before stepping out”, and was supported by her then-colleagues in the Greens by being accompanied by someone “whenever I walked inside this building”.

“At the time, I was convinced that the government believed me,” she said. “Moving the person’s office reassured me that they understood the seriousness of what I experienced.”

Thorpe said she chose not to go to the police or pursue legal action, but would speak out against abuse and harassment occurring in parliament.

“I want to focus on making this place safe for everyone,” she said. “And I call on the government to immediately increase the number of security guards in the building and cameras in the corridors and to consult women who work here on what measures and can and should be taken,” she said.

Van stood to make a personal statement after Thorpe’s tearful speech, describing Thorpe’s allegations as “concocted from beginning to end”.

He accused Thorpe of “cowering under the umbrella of parliamentary privilege to make her claim”.

Van said he had acknowledged publicly that he had moved offices after an earlier allegation from Thorpe that he made her feel uncomfortable.

“That was what was put to me, an allegation that I denied then and I deny today,” he said.

“I agreed to move offices to ensure the avoidance of this.”

He said he also did so to protect himself against Thorpe’s “irrational concerns and ensure the effective and smooth running of the parliament”.

He said Thorpe’s choice not to go to the police with her allegation was evidence that what she had said was false.

He called for an investigation into Thorpe’s “outrageous claims so they can prove to be false and [I] will fully cooperate with investigators and answer any questions that they might have.”

Dutton said he wasn’t aware of the detail of Senator Van moving offices until Thorpe made her allegation on Wednesday, and he then made enquiries about the matter.

“I’m advised that the action at the time that was taken was to the satisfaction of both Senator Thorpe and the Greens Senate leadership team.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/david-van-moves-to-the-crossbench-after-thorpe-s-senate-accusations-20230615-p5dgsb.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czxra2kIv-A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011116

File: ae2912e2c5ee636⋯.jpg (164.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Security_personnel_stand_g….jpg)

File: 9081b4258718d33⋯.jpg (91.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Members_of_the_World_Healt….jpg)

File: 875ecc19a557d17⋯.jpg (112 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chinese_virologist_Shi_Zhe….jpg)

File: 7685202e3b7ea35⋯.jpg (182.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Few_pedestrians_are_seen_i….jpg)

Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists the first to be sickened by Covid-19

TRICIA RIVERA - JUNE 14, 2023

Three Wuhan scientists toying with the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2 were the first to contract Covid-19, as evidence the virus came from a lab leak rather than a live animal trade market grows.

An investigation by journalists Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi published on the Substack newsletter Public reported that Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu were identified as “patients zero” of the virus by US government sources.

They were involved in “gain-of-function” research on SARS-like coronaviruses.

The investigation confirms the three WIV members were directly in the lab and were involved in collecting and experimenting with viruses and fell sick in late 2019. Mr Hu, who led WIV’s gain-of-function research, is believed to be a close contact of Shi Zhengli, the Chinese virologist who focuses on coronaviruses of bat origin.

Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard molecular biologist Alina Chan told Public and Racket Mr Hu was “essentially the next Shi Zhengli”.

“He was her star pupil,” she said. “He had been making chimeric SARS-like viruses and testing these in humanised mice. If I had to guess who would be doing this risky virus research and most at risk of getting accidentally infected, it would be him.”

Mr Hu and Ms Yu were both involved in co-authoring a paper with Ms Zhengli in 2019.

The new information that has emerged has also drawn attention to a video aired by Chinese state-run television showing Mr Hu supervising another lab worker without protective gear.

The lab worker was seen handling specimens, with the video also revealing both scientists looking for bat viruses with minimal protection.

“If they were worried about being infected in the field, they would need full body suits with no gaps,” Ms Chan told the investigation.

Former member of the World Health Organisation’s expert advisory committee on human genome editing Jaime Metzl entertained the possibility of Covid-19 originating from a research-related cause. “It’s a game changer if it can be proven that Hu got sick with Covid-19 before anyone else,” he told the investigation. “That would be the smoking gun. Hu was the lead hands-on researcher in Shi’s lab.”

The findings come as governments and agencies continue to probe further into the origins of Covid-19, with the most accepted cause being the virus was transmitted at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan.

“The virus, now officially named SARS-CoV-2, is thought to have originated in a seafood market and is likely to have come from bats before being transmitted to humans from an intermediate animal,” the Australian government’s Department of Health fact sheet outlines.

The US efforts have included a bill signed by President Joe Biden in March that calls for the release of the names and roles of the infected researchers at the Wuhan lab, as well as their symptoms, date of symptoms and their involvement in Covid research.

A previously classified report is expected to be released next week by the Directorate of National Intelligence which could confirm the scientists who potentially first fell sick by Covid-19.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/wuhan-institute-of-virology-scientists-the-first-to-be-sickened-by-covid19/news-story/0afd952b136992f327748450095c8fc0

https://public.substack.com/p/first-people-sickened-by-covid-19

https://public.substack.com/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011137

File: 8e827aebca62ae9⋯.jpg (153.09 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lab_workers_inside_the_P4_….jpg)

File: d7dd4ecc5dad76a⋯.jpg (268.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_P4_laboratory_C_on_the….jpg)

File: 7cf748e62f59bea⋯.jpg (113.9 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chinese_virologist_Shi_Zhe….jpg)

>>19011116

Wuhan scientist Ben Hu, Covid’s ‘patient zero’, an explosive development in pandemic origin story

SHARRI MARKSON - JUNE 15, 2023

Three unknown Chinese scientists working inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s coronavirus unit fell sick with Covid-like symptoms around November 2019.

One of them, a relatively junior scientist, had started a new project earlier that year that was examining whether two new bat coronaviruses could infect humans.

Just months into his experiments, that involved risky gain-of-function research, that can make viruses more transmissible and more virulent to humans, he fell sick, along with two of his colleagues.

The scientist, Ben Hu, reported to the woman who became a household name during the pandemic – often called ‘batlady’ Shi Zhengli.

He was known as one of her proteges.

We first reported on Ben Hu for my book, What Really Happened in Wuhan, where one of my brilliant young researchers, Luke McWilliams uncovered the scientific experiment he was working on.

His project was called: “Pathogenicity of 2 new bat SARS-related CoVs to transgenic mice expressing human ACE2” and it was funded by the Natural National science Foundation of China.

But the results of this study and the details of the two new coronaviruses that Ben Hu was experimenting with were never made public.

Quite the contrary. Instead, they were wiped from the internet.

More than two years ago, on Sky News and on the front page of The Australian, we revealed the intelligence that three workers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had fallen sick with Covid-like symptoms.

Five Eyes intelligence analysts suspected this may have been the first cluster of the pandemic.

This intel led US President Joe Biden to announce a probe into the origins of Covid-19.

The probe ultimately found that agencies were divided in their assessment of how the pandemic started; via a laboratory leak or whether the virus crossed the threshold from animals to humans naturally.

As I reported in my book, What Really Happened in Wuhan, and in The Australian, America’s top-secret intelligence agency had been concerned about the biological activities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology for at least five years before the Covid-19 pandemic.

In the past two years, genuine developments about the origins of the virus have been few and far between. Until now.

The names of the three scientists who fell ill with Covid-like symptoms have been published by overseas independent media outlets called Public and Racket. Those scientists are Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu.

This is as close as we’ve come to explosive intelligence about patient zero.

Ben Hu and Shi Zhengli’s team had taken bat samples from 22 provinces in China, detecting 200 positive samples of SARS-like coronaviruses.

The United States, British and Australian governments should demand answers from China about whether these experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded by Beijing, did in fact lead to the creation and spread of Covid-19.

Answers about how the first pandemic in a century started are still as important now as they were the day our lives descended into chaos and lockdowns.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/wuhan-scientist-ben-hu-covids-patient-zero-an-explosive-development-in-pandemic-origin-story/news-story/d76002b0c3909d4c9dc5a0a38091d0f1

https://www.racket.news/p/on-todays-explosive-coronavirus-story

https://www.racket.news/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011145

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

‘Threat to our national security’: Government to terminate lease for new Russian embassy

Matthew Knott - June 15, 2023

The Albanese government has introduced emergency legislation to prevent Russia from opening a new embassy less than a kilometre from Parliament House in Canberra, saying the new site poses an unacceptable security risk.

The government intervened in the long-running dispute about the embassy site after the Federal Court last week found an eviction order issued by the National Capital Authority (NCA) was invalid.

The Russian government was granted the 99-year lease for the plot of land, in the upmarket suburb of Yarralumla, in 2008 but failed to progress plans to develop the site, leading the NCA to claim it should give it up to another country.

“The government has received very clear security advice as to the risk presented by a new Russian presence, and so close to Parliament House,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a press conference.

“We’re acting quickly to ensure the lease site does not become a formal diplomatic presence.

“The government condemns Russia’s illegal and immoral invasion of Ukraine.

“To be clear, today’s decision is one taken in the national security interests of Australia.”

Albanese said Russia would continue to be allowed to have a diplomatic presence in Australia at its current site in Griffith, which is further away from Parliament House.

“This is not about changing that, this is about the specific risk presented by this site and that is why we are taking this action,” he said as he announced the government would cancel Russia’s lease on the second embassy site.

The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age revealed earlier this year that Australian intelligence agencies had disrupted a highly active “hive” of Russian spies who were posing as diplomats and forced the ring’s key players to leave Australia.

The spy ring’s aim was to recruit Australians with access to classified information and, according to one source with knowledge of the Russians’ activity, use sophisticated technology to steal data and communicate without being intercepted.

Albanese said he consulted the opposition on Wednesday night to ensure the legislation could pass through parliament urgently and take effect as soon as possible.

Ukraine has previously expressed an interest in taking possession of the vacant land in Yarralumla to develop an embassy.

The proposed site, which is adjacent to the current Chinese embassy, would have made the Russian embassy among the closest diplomatic posts to Parliament House.

“The government has received clear national security advice that this would be a threat to our national security. And that is why the government is acting decisively today to bring this … matter to a close,” Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil said.

Opposition foreign affairs minister Simon Birmingham said he “strongly welcomed” the decision, adding that “Australia should always act to protect our national security interests”.

The National Capital Authority announced last August that it was terminating the Russian lease agreement because it had failed to finish construction within a reasonable time.

“The block is a premium site in central Canberra, close to Lake Burley Griffin and the Australian Parliament House,” NCA chief executive Sally Barnes said.

“Ongoing unfinished works detract from the overall aesthetic, importance and dignity of the area reserved for diplomatic missions and foreign representation in the national capital.”

Barnes continued: “With limited blocks currently available for diplomatic purposes, unless a country can demonstrate a willingness and ability to develop the site, the NCA supports a policy of ‘Use it or lose it’.”

The Russian embassy has been contacted for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/threat-to-our-national-security-government-terminates-lease-for-new-russian-embassy-20230615-p5dgp0.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKOqA3m-gNk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011154

File: ec98de465640b16⋯.jpg (1.43 MB,3704x2469,3704:2469,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18960157

Albanese faces AUKUS backlash from Victorian Labor Party faithful

Royce Millar and Broede Carmody - June 15, 2023

Powerful unions want Labor’s rank and file to formally condemn the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal this weekend, potentially setting up an awkward clash with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese when he addresses Victorian Labor’s first state conference in four years.

Both the prime minister and Premier Daniel Andrews will deliver speeches to party faithful at the conference, according to several state and federal government sources.

The conference will be the first since 2019 – before the pandemic, Melbourne’s long lockdowns, and the federal intervention that followed revelations by The Age about branch stacking, especially by former Labor right powerbroker Adem Somyurek.

The 606 delegates will be asked to vote on a motion from manufacturing union the AMWU seen by The Age, slamming Australia’s decision to acquire a nuclear-powered fleet from the United States and the prospect of the Albanese government “dragging Australia into a new Cold War, rather than pursuing the labour movement’s longstanding commitment to a peaceful and independent foreign and defence policy”.

AMWU Victorian secretary Tony Mavromatis said he expected his motion would win strong support from the conference floor.

“We will push ahead with our motion, no matter who is at the conference, including prime ministers,” he said. “The AUKUS deal is a terrible arrangement for Australia. It lets down Australian workers, apprentices and trainees and Australian manufacturing. We should not be getting into nuclear.”

The AUKUS deal was initially agreed to by former prime minister Scott Morrison and later supported by federal Labor.

While Andrews is expected to receive a hero’s welcome after Labor’s resounding November election victory, the conference is the first opportunity for years for Labor’s rank and file to vent over the big issues facing the state, including the housing crisis.

About one in 10 of the draft motions to be voted on deal specifically with housing, including one calling for an increase in social and affordable homes as a proportion of all Victorian housing.

Another calls for the state government to “limit the number of nights per year owners can rent out properties as short-stay accommodation”, an early-stage Labor policy first flagged by The Age last month.

The motions, known as “urgency resolutions”, are opportunities for card-carrying members and unions to influence party policy.

However, they can be rewritten, merged or dropped between now and the weekend as factions and powerbrokers negotiate over which policies to support or reject.

To be held at the Moonee Valley Racecourse, the conference will also be the first public display of factional muscle since the federal intervention.

Labor insiders from across the party agree the Socialist Left will have more weight than four years ago with the faction having grown in strength after an internal investigation into branch stacking led to the cancellation of about 1800 memberships, mainly from the right faction.

Adding to the Left’s influence has been the move of the former National Union of Workers out of the Right and into the Socialist Left faction as it merged with United Voice to form the United Workers Union.

Some party insiders also see the weekend meeting as an important preparation for the federal conference in Brisbane in August, where the AUKUS submarine deal and stage three tax cuts are expected to feature prominently.

Labor’s national executive has administered the branch since branch stacking revelations were aired in June 2020.

The state conference was traditionally the setting for often passionate public rows over policy and factional grievances, especially in the tumultuous 1970s and ’80s. Conferences have been more stage-managed in recent years.

A key change at this year’s conference will be the election of committees, including the powerful administrative committee, by postal ballot rather than from the conference floor.

The move follows a complaint to the party’s dispute tribunal by veteran Labor activist Eric Derricott about the factional control over elections at the conference, but will leave the results of the election unknown for some weeks.

After this conference all such elections will be held by secret ballot.

Current state Labor president Susie Byers said Victorian Labor had achieved much in the past three years, “not just with election victories, but reforms to our branch that have made the organisation one our members can be proud to belong to”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/albanese-faces-aukus-backlash-from-victorian-labor-party-faithful-20230614-p5dgix.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011175

File: 046d4f5d7e0acb0⋯.jpg (118.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,High_profile_Hillsong_past….jpg)

File: 9272a7344b01a65⋯.jpg (101.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Frank_Houston_sexually_ass….jpg)

File: 16f4f6f718a3507⋯.jpg (121.94 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brett_Sengstock_right_deni….jpg)

File: e0200f5725f6f97⋯.jpg (121.37 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brian_Houston_arrived_at_c….jpg)

Hillsong founder Brian Houston accused of covering up father’s sexual abuse

STEVE ZEMEK - JUNE 15, 2023

1/2

Brian Houston concealed his paedophile father’s sexual abuse of a schoolboy amid a church-wide culture of keeping things “in house”, a court has been told.

Mr Houston, 69, has pleaded not guilty to one count of concealing the serious indictable offence of another person, arguing he was merely abiding by the wishes of his father’s victim by not going to police.

The former Hillsong pastor, at the NSW Local Court for a hearing, is accused of concealing that his late father Frank Houston had sexually assaulted a seven-year-old boy in January 1970.

He argues that from September 1999 until his father’s death in 2004, he had a “reasonable excuse” not to go to police because of the man’s unwillingness to come forward.

The court has heard that Brett Sengstock was sexually assaulted by Frank Houston, who was staying at his family’s Coogee home in Sydney’s eastern suburbs, while on a preaching tour of Australia.

Mr Sengstock told the court that during a meeting with Frank Houston, himself a prominent preacher, at a western Sydney McDonald’s he was told to sign his name on a napkin and was offered $10,000.

Mr Sengstock previously told the court: “Quite frankly, I was paid for my silence”.

Crown prosecutor Gareth Harrison, during his closing address on Thursday, argued that Mr Sengstock was being “paid off”.

“This was buying Mr Sengstock’s silence,” Mr Harrison said, adding that it was “hush money”.

Mr Sengstock did not reveal the abuse until he told his mother, Rose Hardingham, when he was 16-years-old.

Then in mid-1998, Mr Sengstock’s mother disclosed her son’s abuse to pastor Barbara Taylor and later to pastor Kevin “Mad Dog” Mudford, the court has heard.

Mr Harrison told the court that there was a “culture” within the church “that when faced with potential scandal” the “reaction was to protect the church”.

The court has heard that Frank Houston admitted to his son that he had abused Mr Sengstock.

And Brian Houston subsequently went to church leaders in individual meetings to inform them of his father’s crimes.

“If it was his only focus to protect the church, he would tell as few people as possible, would he not?” Magistrate Gareth Christofi asked.

“Whatever he told these people, he knew they weren’t going to go to the police,” Mr Harrison said.

“Not one of these people mentioned the police. That just demonstrates absolutely the culture of this church was to keep it in-house, don’t go outside the church.

“With that confident knowledge, he was able to conceal this from the police.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011185

File: 5ca85339b13c963⋯.mp4 (15.91 MB,640x360,16:9,Brian_Houston_speaks_about….mp4)

>>19011175

2/2

The Assemblies of God in December 2001 sent a letter to all ordained pastors in which they said that Frank Houston’s credentials had been removed because of a “serious moral failure”.

Mr Houston has stated in interviews, and in his evidence to the court, that he did not go to police because he had been instructed by Mr Sengstock that he did not want authorities involved.

“He never actually wanted the fact of his assault published to the church or to the police or in the press,” Mr Houston’s defence barrister, Phillip Boulten, told the court on Friday.

“He did not want the church to conduct an investigation into the assault. He did not want police to look into Frank Houston.”

Mr Sengstock, during his evidence denied ever telling Mr Houston that he did not want to take part in police or church investigations.

Mr Houston has argued that before his father’s death in November 2004, there were tens of thousands of people who learned of Frank Houston’s paedophilia after he made several public statements - including at the 2002 Hillsong conference.

In a video played during the trial and released by the court, Mr Houston addresses the Hillsong Conference at Sydney’s SuperDome in 2002 and talks to the 18,000-strong crowd about his father’s sexual abuse of the boy.

Mr Boulten attacked the argument there was evidence of a church-wide cover up.

“Your honour should be cautious about this whole concept,” Mr Boulten said.

“Not just because the evidence on this is so flimsy … There are obvious problems about sustaining that argument given what my client did in front of thousands of people.”

The court has heard that a meeting of the church’s national executive took place inside the Qantas club at Sydney airport in 1999.

It was there that the Assemblies of God board was told of Frank Houston’s crimes against Brett Sengstock and resolved to stand him down.

According to minutes from that meeting, the AOG had obtained legal advice indicating they did not have to disclose the matter to police because by that time Mr Sengstock was in his 30s.

Mr Harrison told the court on Thursday that that “legal advice” could only have been provided by Brian Houston.

“The accused told the meeting he had obtained legal advice,” Mr Harrison said.

“He did that to conceal it from police and there can be no other reason for that conduct.”

In his evidence to the court, Mr Houston denied delivering such advice to the meeting.

The trial continues on Friday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/hillsong-founder-brian-houston-returns-to-court/news-story/69a46ab5dbaa5d4579ad9d3dec92865b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19011190

File: adcb0a8a0764fca⋯.jpg (216.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Attorney_General_Yvette_D_….jpg)

File: 662299f2cde793a⋯.jpg (175.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,LNP_justice_spokesperson_T….jpg)

>>18940103

>>18945832

>>18992075

>>18992091

Queensland makes gender optional on birth certificates

LYDIA LYNCH - JUNE 14, 2023

Sexual reassignment surgery will no longer be mandatory for adults and teenagers wanting to change sex on their Queensland birth certificates under new laws that were expected to pass state parliament on Wednesday night.

The transgender reforms, opposed by the Liberal National Party, will also give parents the ­option not to list any gender on their newborn’s documentation.

Children older than 16 will be able to legally self-identify as another sex without parental consent, as long as they have a supporting statement from an adult who has known them for at least a year. Those aged 12 to 15 will ­require their parents’ permission to change their birth certificate, but can apply to the courts if their parents do not support an application.

Attorney-General Yvette D’Ath said the opt-in approach for listing sex on birth certificates was designed to “give people the greatest agency over what information they want recorded”.

“Providing these protections to trans and gender-diverse people does not pose a threat to others,” she said.

Critics of the reforms say self-identification would impede on the right to privacy in “female-only spaces” such as toilets, change rooms and prisons.

LNP justice spokesman Tim Nicholls said the opposition would not support the legislation, in part due to “significant and genuine” reservations about allowing children to change their sex descriptor.

“Children under the age of 16 are often ill-equipped psychologically to make such a large and life-changing alteration to their sexual identity and we should go down this path, as I said in my very early introduction, with caution and consideration,” he said.

Ms D’Ath said the reforms were not “dangerous or reckless” and had been adopted in other states. “It follows in the footsteps of reforms which most other Australian jurisdictions have already progressed,” she said.

“Queensland is one of the last Australian jurisdictions to progress reforms in this area, so we were also able to look at the models established in other jurisdictions and learn from them.”

Tasmania became the first state to make gender optional on birth certificates in 2019.

However, Queensland will not require a medical statement from a doctor or a psychologist, which will be ­required in Western Australia under its laws and has already been adopted in South ­Australia, the ACT and the Northern Territory.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/queensland-makes-gender-optional-on-birth-certificates/news-story/a7762778be9f8da23cb5f717421b7c79

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016362

File: 0bec3fc4465bbfa⋯.jpg (342.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_politics_of_the_voice_….jpg)

>>18928670

Indigenous voice to parliament will be a distraction from the real problems, writes John Anderson

JOHN ANDERSON - JUNE 16, 2023

1/2

The so-called voice to parliament, enshrined in the much-praised Uluru Statement from the Heart, claims to establish a constitutionally guaranteed Indigenous voice in our legislative and executive arms of government. This, according to its advocates, will ensure that the plight of Indigenous Australians is impossible to ignore.

By saying so-called voice, I mean no disrespect, but it is misleading to suggest that Indigenous Australians currently have no voice to parliament when each Indigenous Australian has an equal vote to anyone else and, importantly, each state and territory has a minister for Aboriginal affairs, and federally we have a minister for Indigenous Australians.

These portfolios liaise directly with many Indigenous stakeholders. Indigenous Australians, like all Australians, have many voices to parliament already.

I and many others am simply not convinced that this so-called voice will achieve anything positive beyond a very short-lived rush of joy for those in favour of it.

More seriously, though, I think the voice to parliament will actually prove to be detrimental to the cause of Indigenous disadvantage, for it will beget divisiveness and cynicism, and its politics will prove to be a distraction from the very practical challenges of closing the gaps in health, education, domestic violence, substance abuse, employment and income.

Other countries that have adopted similar approaches have borne bad fruit.

Take the Waitangi Tribunal in New Zealand, which has direct veto power over certain legislation. This discriminatory innovation to the New Zealand government system has expanded over time and has contributed to divisive racial politics. We’ve got to be wiser here.

Despite the near-universal praise heaped on the Uluru Statement from the Heart, its words, if they were to be taken seriously by Indigenous Australians, are actually misleading and highly detrimental. Most notably, the document declares Indigenous Australians to be “powerless”, and that “constitutional reforms” are the only way to “empower our people”, and that Indigenous Australians currently do not have “power over our destiny”.

It is bad enough to be saying to a generation of Indigenous Australians that they currently have no control over their destiny, but what are Indigenous youths to conclude about their agency over their future if the referendum fails? Inseparable from the voice to parliament is the question of a treaty, and treaties very often involve the establishment of separate, autonomous Indigenous territories with massive taxpayer funding.

Certainly this has been the case with Australian discussions of a treaty – we are talking about a radical move.

The Uluru Statement itself calls for a “better future based on … self-determination”. The phrase self-determination is a barely veiled reference to a treaty between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Indeed, the Uluru Statement calls for a “Makarrata Commission”, Makarrata being a term historically referring to a treaty between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

In 2021 Anthony Albanese, now the major champion of the voice to parliament, said: “The voice is the bedrock upon which we must build. I want a voice and truth, then treaty.” I think we need to take the Prime Minister at his word. I also believe he should, in the interests of transparency, explain exactly what that three-step process of voice, treaty and truth-telling will be, and how he believes it will “close the gap” rather than widen divisions.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016366

File: 8c341f82a037d7d⋯.jpg (127.85 KB,768x1023,256:341,Anthropologist_Peter_Sutto….jpg)

File: 902d3882b3e8a5b⋯.jpg (149.31 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_voice_to_parlia….jpg)

>>19016362

2/2

If the voice is step one on this path to a treaty between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, then we can rightly expect a perpetual call for a such a treaty. And given that most Australians will not be sympathetic to such an extreme reform, how will this not beget perpetual grievance and cynicism among many Aboriginal Australians? All the while the gaps between Indigenous Australians will remain, with the politics of the voice overshadowing the everyday needs of Indigenous Australians much as today the question of changing the date of Australia Day gets far more media attention than the horrific rates of domestic violence and child abuse in remote communities. We don’t need more distractions from the real issues.

I am encouraged by Indigenous Australians such as senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, businessman Nyunggai Warren Mundine and academic Anthony Dillon, whose passion for Indigenous welfare is undeniable yet who prefer practical and tried public policy as the best means to close the gap.

For example, in 2003 alcohol restrictions were introduced to the Aurukun region in western Cape York in far north Queensland, resulting in a sharp decline in murders and suicides, and a 90 per cent decline in people presenting in hospitals for suturing for injuries sustained in fights.

But the current government scrapped the cashless welfare card in many dysfunctional communities that prevented money from being spent on alcohol (and gambling) rather than food for families. It was scrapped despite earnest Indigenous voices – led by Price – crying out for its continuation.

In The Politics of Suffering, a classic discussion of Indigenous policy in Australia, anthropologist and linguist Peter Sutton regretfully wrote of “an apparent correlation between the progressiveness of policy and the degree of (Indigenous) community disaster”. I’m sorry to say that I foresee much the same for this so-called voice to parliament: it will further entrench a sense of irresolvable grievance among many Indigenous Australians and, worse, become a distraction from the real problems that require practical policy initiatives.

John Anderson was deputy prime minister and leader of the Nationals from 1999 to 2005.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-will-be-a-distraction-from-the-real-problems/news-story/f783bdaeeea2408613af2142dfb2b3f8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016423

File: 642fa60eacfaadc⋯.jpg (146.93 KB,1536x864,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: feb5024e5cbdcc6⋯.jpg (2.35 MB,4552x3035,4552:3035,The_prime_minister_remains….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992119

>>18992132

The Yes campaign is calm amid the ‘inevitable’ messy phase. But it still has divisions

Anthony Albanese is under pressure to take greater control of the push for a Voice as the No camp gains traction.

Paul Sakkal - JUNE 16, 2023

1/3

Divided on its core message to Australians, the movement to establish an Indigenous Voice is facing its toughest moment.

A day before a poll showed the No side ahead for the first time, arguably Australia’s most eminent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson admitted something to this newspaper that none of his colleagues had said publicly: their adversaries were on top.

The year-long debate to create a new chapter in our Constitution has enlivened a new Trumpian element in Australian politics, according to Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney. Pollsters are observing Brexit-like dynamics whereby regional and less-educated Australians are more reluctant to change the Constitution in a way that a credentialed minority of legal experts believe could harm our system of government.

Under pressure to take control of the campaign as his government’s focus is necessarily fixed on the gloomy economy, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese faces questions about his referendum pursuit that some Labor figures consider an uncharacteristic electoral risk, testing his political judgment and rhetorical ability to carry a complex reform.

On Thursday, senior government figures had a flurry of meetings and conversations about how to boost the campaign. Four sources said there was an expectation that the prime minister’s office and the government would become more hands-on in managing the referendum in coming weeks.

But the major Yes campaign, Yes23, is calm about the referendum’s trajectory. Albanese remains confident that a perhaps unprecedented coalition of elite corporate and sporting bodies and smaller community groups will sway an increasingly cosmopolitan electorate.

The prime minister displayed his optimism on Thursday, pointing out some polls were rosier than others and emphasising the need to reconcile the nation.“Once the debate leaves Canberra,” he said, there will be “different outcomes”.

The analysis of Yes23’s strategists is that a messy, defensive phase was inevitable in the middle of this year. After a simple value proposition – to do the right thing for Indigenous Australians and heed their call – was put forward at the start of the campaign, Yes campaigners expected a period of needling would cause some drop-off in support.

In the period leading up to polling day (the likeliest date for the referendum is October 14), proponents are banking on voters – many of whom are disengaged and will still be forming their opinions – returning to a simple value judgment on whether they think voting Yes is the right thing to do. In the same way as voters at the last election backed Albanese ahead of the disliked Scott Morrison despite an at-times poor Labor campaign, Yes figures believe they are putting a question that has the majority support of a younger, more progressive nation.

“Would we like to have a bigger lead? Of course. But to not understand the phase we are in and panic is to not understand how campaigns play out,” one source said. “The polling reflects the phase we are in.”

Sources say the Yes campaign has about $30 million in the bank. This figure will grow, and the campaign is yet to make major announcements of support for a campaign that will draw heavily on state premiers, the network of teal MPs, and dozens of local councils.

Yes campaigners believe their nearly 10,000-strong volunteer army will be a huge advance over the No side, which will have far fewer volunteers and less money to flood the country with crucial advertising.

But despite this soothing analysis, there’s no doubt Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and prominent No campaigners jumped the Yes movement. As opponents opened up frontier after frontier in their effort to stymie Albanese’s project, Yes23 was still finding its feet and executing the more difficult task of setting up a national campaign infrastructure from scratch.

Unlike a regular election campaign run by well-oiled political machines, leaders of the amorphous Yes side are unable to enforce discipline on messaging, timing and operations across the disparate grouping of land councils, Indigenous leaders, unions, and varying Yes campaign bodies.

Yes23 will shortly move into a Sydney office that will operate similarly to a political party campaign unit. Conversations in weekly meetings of top Yes23 staff – including Liberal operatives Simon Frost and Benn Ayre, campaign director Dean Parkin, unionist Kara Keys and state-based field organisers – now reflect a sense that the national operation is ready to launch from the first of July.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016431

File: d271b48ed184475⋯.jpg (217.35 KB,1023x797,1023:797,Vote_over_time.jpg)

File: d4faf72e8a53113⋯.jpg (1.28 MB,5472x3648,3:2,Mark_Textor_s_polling_outf….jpg)

>>19016423

2/3

Yes23 has hired Adam Noble to run its digital campaigning, the same role he played in the marriage equality postal survey in 2017, to help counter the impressive online presence of the subterranean No side.

Albanese and his allies often point out that this is not his referendum. This is despite the prime minister using his election night speech to pledge the referendum and, inevitably, tie his authority to the constitutional recognition that prime ministers from Bob Hawke to Scott Morrison were not brave enough to pursue.

The prime minister, his allies’ argument goes, is putting to the people the request of Australia’s Indigenous establishment and the historic grassroots representatives that met at Uluru to call for a Voice as a tangible mechanism to improve livelihoods and move beyond symbolic recognition of first Australians in the Constitution.

The prime minister is still expressing optimism about the referendum in private conversations, according to sources who have spoken to him in recent weeks.

No thought is yet being given within Labor circles to pulling the referendum or radically redrawing it, as Dutton this week suggested. Some MPs and Labor hardheads calculate that a referendum loss may dent Albanese’s authority but would not be disastrous for his government. Others worry it could be more severe for the prime minister and have a chilling effect on other ambitious agenda items.

Paradoxically, the referendum going down could cement Dutton’s leadership in his conservative-leaning party room but potentially alienate city-based voters he desperately needs to win an election.

This political calculus, however, does not account for the broken spirits of Indigenous giants such as Marcia Langton, Pat Anderson and Noel Pearson, and the historic setback for reconciliation and the relationship between black and white Australia that a No vote would represent.

Yes23 is given hope by its own polling, which uses larger sampling sizes than most polling conducted for media outlets and therefore has a smaller margin for error. It shows support for the Voice about halfway between the Resolve Political Monitor poll – published by this masthead, which shows support at 49 per cent – and the most rosy poll, published by Essential, that shows support at 60 per cent. The Australian Labor Party’s internal polling also shows higher support than the Resolve poll.

The referendum working group that helped to thrash out the proposed constitutional amendment will meet in Canberra next week – the first chance in weeks for government figures to engage with Indigenous leaders after months of focus on the budget and interest rates.

“This thing needs the government and Albo to bash some heads together and bring discipline to the show,” one campaign figure said.

A more centralised guiding force could help the Yes campaign overcome the divisions that have opened up over its messaging. Influenced strongly by the advice of storied Liberal-aligned polling firm CT Group (formerly Crosby Textor, run by campaign guru Mark Textor, who worked closely with John Howard), Yes23 wants to focus its message on constitutional recognition, which its research shows is more widely supported and easily understood than the Voice advisory body.

But many Yes figures, particularly those who are more progressive, want to double down on the Voice and its potentially powerful role in policymaking. Some sections of the movement would also like to cast the Calma-Langton report commissioned by then Indigenous affairs minister Ken Wyatt and its recommendation for local and regional voices into the dustbin of history, raising questions about how the Voice would actually work.

The perceived underperformance of Yes23 prompted some Yes figures to push for change at the top of the organisation, which they have privately criticised for holding fire on major advertising spending that will roll out in coming months.

And there is unease across progressive Australia about the role of CT Group.

Tony Barry, a Liberal operative who worked at Crosby Textor and now works at consultancy RedBridge, explains that the well-known firm’s prestige has been built in running campaigns that look different to the Voice referendum.

“Tex’s [Mark Textor] campaign pedigree is speaking to the Liberal base and Liberal-persuadables and his political record speaks for itself. But the Voice campaign also needs to speak to the Labor base, the soft Labor vote as well as Greens and independent supporters,” Barry said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016437

File: a66d2af38b84d79⋯.jpg (2.73 MB,5500x3659,5500:3659,More_involvement_from_the_….jpg)

File: 1bcc7ebeeaed63a⋯.jpg (2.41 MB,5113x3409,5113:3409,The_Yes_campaign_believes_….jpg)

>>19016431

3/3

“In our research at RedBridge Group, these cohorts instinctively want to support a Yes vote and think it is an idea with good intent. But the emerging problem for their campaign is that undecided voters can only come up with one compelling reason to support it but a growing number of reasons to oppose it.”

“Despite having a huge campaign war chest, their campaign messaging is fragmented and although it has covered off the ‘what’, it hasn’t yet explained the ‘why’.”

“The Yes campaign has plenty of time and money to turn it around but unless they make some messaging and structural changes with their narrow casting, they are going to keep losing altitude.”

CT Group, sources said, is due to step back from its more hands-on role in media and strategy to focus more on its bread-and-butter work of research and advertising.

Another problem for advocates of change is capturing the attention of the media, which is far less interested in the hundreds of community events held by Voice-supporting groups and more keen on hyperbolic claims and unedifying spats between black leaders.

Essential pollster Peter Lewis, whose research is published in the Guardian Australia, is helping Yes23 host dozens of town hall events with business and other groups, explaining to them what the Uluru Statement from the Heart is. He wrote this week that hyper-partisan and conflict-driven media was giving the No campaign something it did not deserve: false equivalence.

He told this masthead: “Our challenge is to find ways of building hope and unlocking Australians’ better angels so we can get this across the line.”

Dr Andrew Hughes, a political marketing expert at the ANU, said the Yes campaign was off to a “terrible” start and had failed to counter what he called the dis- and misinformation of No advocates.

Conversations have started about using more Labor MPs to engage in daily brawling with No figures, but Hughes said damage had already been done as Dutton, Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine poked holes in the case for change.

“Most people are already making their minds up and going okay, well, at the moment, I’m sort of a no because I don’t know enough details,” he said.

“All those questions you should be answering now if you’re Yes, you get that stuff out there now.”

If the referendum fails, historians will surely attach weight to the reflections of Liberal senator Andrew Bragg. A staunchly pro-Voice figure, he has over the past months lost enthusiasm for a cause so close to his heart that he wrote a book about it.

In April, Bragg had flagged plans to rally a group of pro-Voice federal Liberal MPs to build support for the referendum within the party as he did for the marriage equality debate. This week, he expressed fear the referendum would fail in part due to Labor’s “intransigence” and refusal, in his view, to build bipartisanship.

He was not mentioned in a news story about the new Liberals for Yes group, which featured little-known ACT politicians led by former territory chief minister Kate Carnell. The launch of this group was coordinated partly by media officers involved in the mainstream Yes grouping, indicating that an organic and strong Liberal outfit had failed to materialise.

Speaking in the Senate on Wednesday, Bragg said: “I think there has been far too much politics here, and, for reasons which are unclear to me, the government has rebuffed efforts to build consensus. It’s now up to the government to convince people why they should vote yes.”

“I’d hoped that the middle ground was going to be larger at this point. I have to say that it feels invisible.”

“This is, obviously, a very disappointing starting point for this referendum, but I do wish the campaigners well.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-yes-campaign-is-calm-amid-the-inevitable-messy-phase-but-it-still-has-divisions-20230615-p5dgs0.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016452

File: 908d0c3f6aa60a3⋯.jpg (72.03 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_s_lawyers_h….jpg)

File: 40d3015ed3b8e24⋯.jpg (96.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_was_accused….jpg)

File: 6fe4c7c0d9f3304⋯.jpg (70.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,Wilkinson_won_a_Logie_for_….jpg)

File: 1bb8c1daa80d4b8⋯.jpg (79.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Lehrmann_sat_down_for_a….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyers’ furious letter to Sunrise over ‘false’ allegation

COURTNEY GOULD - JUNE 16, 2023

Lisa Wilkinson has lodged an official complaint with Channel 7, claiming a segment on its flagship morning program Sunrise aired “false” allegations against her.

The former Project host’s lawyers took issue with the claim Wilkinson had “coached” Brittany Higgins to build a campaign against the man she accused of sexually assaulting her, Bruce Lehrmann.

“That allegation is false. The material (falsely described in the report as ‘secret recordings’) published on Spotlight on the Seven Network on 4 June 2023 certainly does not justify that allegation,” the lawyers’ letter said.

Wilkinson’s lawyers claim Seven made no effort to contact the broadcaster about the claims included in the Sunrise segment, which also alleged Ms Higgins had penned an “angry letter” to the host.

“Ms Wilkinson has no record of a letter in the terms described in the report. We request that you urgently provide a copy so that our client can respond to the claims made,” the letter said.

The complaint also extended to the Spotlight program featuring an interview with Mr Lehrmann that aired portions of a recording of a five-hour meeting between Ms Higgins and Wilkinson.

The audio had been handed over under a search warrant by the Australian Federal Police.

It was not tendered to a recent board of inquiry into how criminal justice agencies handled the case.

Mr Lehrmann is suing Channel 10, Wilkinson and the ABC for defamation over their reporting in the wake of the sexual assault allegation made by Ms Higgins in 2019.

The letters, sent by law firm Gillis Delaney, were tendered in a 307-page affidavit to the Federal Court filed by Marlia Saunders, a lawyer representing Ten.

Included in the affidavit was an email from ACT Acting Director of Public Prosecutions Anthony Williamson SC.

He said while it appeared evidence produced under subpoena had been used improperly, the source of the leak was unclear.

“One reasonably available inference is that Mr Lehrmann provided the material to Channel 7 in breach of the undertaking,” Mr Williamson wrote.

“But that, of course, (is) not the only reasonably available inference. It also remains reasonably possible that any number of other people who had access to the documents could have breached it.

“What is also unclear is the ‘knowledge’ of Channel 7 surrounding the provenance of the documents.”

Mr Lehrmann’s barrister vehemently denied his client was the source of the leak in an appearance before the Federal Court last week.

Wilkinson’s lawyers also accused Spotlight executive producer Mark Llewellyn of not seeking comment to avoid legal action that could have blocked the show’s broadcast.

“The audio recording was a document produced under subpoena in criminal proceedings that was not tendered in court,” they wrote on June 6.

“This is something that the Seven Network must have known when it used it.

“We infer … you were aware an injunction was inevitable if it came to our client’s attention prior to broadcast that you had this audio recording in your possession.”

In a follow-up letter sent two days later, lawyers accused Seven of “deliberate and calculated” conduct.

“The misuse of such documents is a serious matter because it undermines the administration of justice,” the lawyers wrote.

“It beggars belief that a 90-minute program was prepared, apparently over many weeks if not months, and at no time was any contact made with our client or Network 10 to attempt to obtain their comment.”

Gillis Delaney lawyers also sent letters about reports in The Australian and the Daily Mail.

Mr Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to one charge of sexual assault. His trial was aborted due to jury misconduct and a retrial did not proceed due to concerns about Ms Higgins’ mental health.

The charge against him was dropped and there have been no findings made against him.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/lisa-wilkinsons-lawyers-furious-letter-to-sunrise-over-false-allegation/news-story/2ed123ebcbbf8a2f79b33005646a86a1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016472

File: 88182a1e69f6e02⋯.jpg (884.5 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Peter_Dutton_moved_to_expe….jpg)

File: 6170ca8cd80c30d⋯.jpg (2.58 MB,4947x3298,3:2,David_Van_says_Mr_Dutton_s….jpg)

File: 7521a0c43ab6073⋯.jpg (120.72 KB,1191x794,3:2,Queensland_senator_Amanda_….jpg)

File: 412ca98b0fa613d⋯.jpg (130.26 KB,1254x836,3:2,Lidia_Thorpe_was_emotional….jpg)

>>19005499

Peter Dutton says senator David Van should quit parliament, after another allegation raised with him

Jake Evans - 17 June 2023

Liberal leader Peter Dutton says senator David Van should quit parliament, after airing that allegations made against the senator by a third person were brought to him, contributing to his rapid expulsion from the party room.

Over an explosive 48 hours, independent senator Lidia Thorpe raised allegations under parliamentary privilege that Senator Van had sexually harassed and assaulted her — which he immediately denied, and she later withdrew.

Former Liberal senator Amanda Stoker yesterday raised her own claims that Senator Van had inappropriately touched her at a party by squeezing her bottom twice — something she said she dealt with internally at the time, but felt compelled to bring to Mr Dutton's attention after Senator Thorpe spoke in the Senate.

Ms Stoker said she raised the matter with Senator Van the next day and he apologised and told her it would not happen again.

Senator Van has reportedly told NewsCorp he could not recall the alleged incident, and it was not something he would ever do.

"I can confirm I had a very friendly and open discussion with my colleague some years ago about this and made it clear that I had no recollection of any such event, and can confirm it is not something I would ever do," Senator Van told NewsCorp.

Speaking to Channel Nine this morning, Mr Dutton said a further allegation had informed his decision to expel Senator Van from the Liberal party room.

"I raised another allegation with Senator Van but I'm not going to comment in relation to those matters otherwise," Mr Dutton said.

"I made a decision yesterday based on all of the information that was available to me.

"This is an issue in any workplace and I think any boss would be remiss not to act on suggestions."

Mr Dutton said his decision was not a reflection on the veracity of the claims, and he had referred the matters to the parliament's independent workplace authority, the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service (PWSS), for investigation.

The PWSS was established following a review into how parliament responded to serious incidents in the workplace.

Though that investigation is only just underway, Mr Dutton later this morning told Nine Radio that he had spoken to the Victorian branch of the Liberal Party about whether Senator Van should remain in parliament.

"The membership of the party is an issue for the party to resolve [but] I think it's in everyone's best interest that he resign from the parliament, and I hope he is able to do that sooner [rather] than later," Mr Dutton said.

Van says expulsion from party room 'not fair'

Senator Van told a reporter late yesterday he did not think Mr Dutton's decision to expel him from the party room was fair, and in a statement to the ABC said he would make no further public comment until the investigation was completed.

"I am utterly shattered by the events of the past days and stunned that my good reputation can be so wantonly savaged without due process or accountability," Senator Van said.

"I will fully cooperate with whatever process Mr Dutton proposes to determine these matters as quickly and fairly as possible."

Senator Thorpe yesterday used the Senate to describe alleged experiences of her first months at parliament, including being followed and cornered in a stairwell by one man, being fearful to leave her office, and being aggressively followed, propositioned and inappropriately touched by men.

She did not name anybody in those comments.

Senator Van reasserted to the Senate his strong denial of any inappropriate behaviour, and supported an investigation into "outrageous" claims against him.

Speaking to ABC Radio this morning, Senator Thorpe said the past 48 hours had been "horrible".

"I was questioned. I was absolutely demonised that day, by everybody," Senator Thorpe said.

"And you wonder why women don't speak out. You wonder why we are silenced. It's because of that kind of behaviour."

Senator Larissa Waters said the week at parliament had felt like the discussion on women's safety in the workplace was "back at square one".

"I just hope that we can continue the reforms that we have started to make with the Set the Standards report and have a safer workplace," Senator Waters said.

"What a harrowing week it has been."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-16/dutton-another-allegation-against-senator-david-van/102486926

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016485

File: 845713111ccc651⋯.jpg (3.73 MB,5100x3400,3:2,Brian_Houston_leaves_Downi….jpg)

>>19011175

Brian Houston told thousands of people about his father’s child sexual abuse, court told

Georgina Mitchell - June 16, 2023

Former Hillsong leader Brian Houston did not cover up his father’s sexual abuse of a child and actually told tens of thousands of people, including an annual church conference attended by the police commissioner, a court has heard.

Houston, 69, is accused of concealing a serious indictable offence over failing to report the crime to police between learning of it in 1999 and his father’s death in 2004. He has pleaded not guilty.

In closing submissions on Friday, defence barrister Phillip Boulten, SC, told Downing Centre Local Court his client had a reasonable excuse for not making a police report – that the victim, Brett Sengstock, did not want police involved.

The court heard Houston confronted his father in November 1999 and the older man confessed to molesting Sengstock in the 1970s. Houston then informed his father he was no longer welcome to attend Hillsong.

Boulten said Houston subsequently told the church’s national executive about his father’s confession.

“Brian Houston did what no one else was prepared to do: to confront the issue, and he confronted it head-on with his dad,” Boulten said.

“He told his father, ‘I’m going to stand you down now, you’ll never go back to Hillsong, you are going to be decredentialled’. And that’s what upset Frank the most. It was devastating to Frank that he would no longer be a credentialled preacher.”

Boulten said Sengstock was informed that Frank Houston’s preaching credentials had been revoked and was offered counselling, which he rejected. The barrister said it would be “very unfair” to describe this as some kind of cover-up.

“If it is the case that the accused spoke to him, or could be the case that he spoke to him, then that gives a fatal blow to the suggestion that my client was covering up,” Boulten said.

He said his client “foolishly” didn’t announce to “the whole world” what his father had done, but he did tell many thousands of people – starting with all pastors and volunteers at Hillsong and Sydney Christian Life Centre.

Boulten said about 2000 attendees at a leadership vision night in February 2002 were told Frank Houston’s credentials had been removed “because of child molestation”, and tapes of two church events in March 2002 showed Brian Houston also told those crowds what his father did.

On Easter Sunday in 2002, Houston told “thousands of people in the audience”, plus some watching on television, “that Frank had conducted himself in a manner that was predatory and involved victims”.

Boulten said Houston also told the annual Hillsong conference in 2002, which had more than 18,000 attendees, that “Frank had been accused of sexual abuse over 30 years ago” but “we have not been led by an active paedophile”.

“Someone who used to go to that conference every year was the commissioner of police,” Boulten said. “Your honour should reject completely the assertion that Brian Houston was involved in a cover-up.”

The barrister said even if his client had other motivations to avoid telling police, if Sengstock’s wishes “played a significant or determinative role in the overall conduct of the accused in the charge period, then that should lead to an acquittal”.

“This is not judgment about Hillsong … this is a criminal trial with a particular charge against a particular person, and it is not enough for the prosecution to say ‘he’s responsible for everything that happened’,” Boulten said.

Magistrate Gareth Christofi will deliver his judgment on August 17.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/brian-houston-told-thousands-of-people-about-his-father-s-child-sexual-abuse-court-told-20230616-p5dh6b.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016500

File: 23a35faea4f2dfc⋯.jpg (77.34 KB,1280x720,16:9,Court_documents_reveal_det….jpg)

File: ae444d9fd5a245e⋯.jpg (82.6 KB,1280x720,16:9,One_Nation_leader_Mark_Lat….jpg)

Sydney MP Alex Greenwich sues Mark Latham for allegedly suggesting he ‘goes to schools to groom children’

MADELEINE ACHENZA - JUNE 16, 2023

Newly released court documents reveal independent MP Alex Greenwich is suing NSW One Nation leader Mark Latham for purportedly painting him as someone who “goes to schools to groom children to become homosexual”.

Conservatives and progressives both responded with fierce disapproval to a graphic and homophobic tweet shared to Mr Latham’s social media on March 30 in which he claimed Mr Greenwich engaged in “disgusting” sexual activities.

Mr Latham deleted the tweet after a public uproar and demands for an apology.

Mr Greenwich offered Mr Latham a chance to settle the matter outside of court along with a firm deadline for an apology, to which Mr Latham refused.

The Federal Court released documents from the defamation proceedings launched last month by Mr Greenwich's lawyers at Dowson Turco Lawyers, a firm that describes itself as “out, loud and proud LGBTIQ+”.

Mr Greenwich is also suing Mr Latham over comments made to The Daily Telegraph just two days after the tweet in which the One Nation leader doubled down on his comments.

Mr Greenwich alleges one of the comments conveys the defamatory meaning that he “is a disgusting human being who goes to schools to groom children to become homosexual”.

The quote in question from Mr Latham is: “When (Greenwich) calls someone a disgusting human being for attending a meeting in a church hall, maybe attention will turn to some of his habits.

“Greenwich goes into schools talking to kids about being gay. I didn’t want to be accused of anything similar, leaving that kind of content on my socials.”

In the quotes, Mr Latham claims that his tweet was a response to comments made by Mr Greenwich in The Sydney Morning Herald in which he called Mr Latham a “disgusting human being”.

Mr Latham is expected to file a defence by July 28.

Mr Greenwich has made a formal complaint to NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb, alleging Mr Latham used a carriage service to “menace, harass or cause offence”.

He has also lodged a complaint of homosexual vilification with Anti-Discrimination NSW.

Federal Court Justice Anna Katzmann deferred the matter to a case management hearing, which is expected to take place on September 25.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sydney-mp-alex-greenwich-sues-mark-latham-for-allegedly-suggesting-he-goes-to-schools-to-groom-children/news-story/671be61cec64f891e3f5730fa3327594

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016533

File: 0125812c21b6787⋯.jpg (490.32 KB,3000x2000,3:2,The_case_centres_around_cl….jpg)

File: 51c5fd029e9a243⋯.jpg (2.69 MB,4256x2832,266:177,The_trial_heard_evidence_f….jpg)

File: 7837f9729d86699⋯.jpg (967.91 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Lawyer_Michael_Magazanik_s….jpg)

File: 4b5faecfbc551b5⋯.jpg (1.67 MB,3936x2624,3:2,Former_WA_Police_officers_….jpg)

File: e57bbc1079a8ffa⋯.jpg (145.7 KB,966x644,3:2,Cable_was_inducted_as_a_le….jpg)

Former football star Barry Cable ordered to pay damages in civil sexual abuse case

Joanna Menagh, Kate Christian, and Tom Wildie - 17 June 2023

1/2

A Perth judge has ruled football "legend" Barry Cable sexually abused a young girl who decades later, has been awarded $818,700 for the "catastrophic" damage she suffered.

The woman, who is now aged in her 60s, launched the civil action in 2019, claiming Cable started abusing her in the late 1960s when she was 12 years old.

She further alleged that after she turned 17, the sexual contact continued, and Cable harassed her until she was in her mid-30s.

She sued the now bankrupt former footballer for around $1 million and today District Court Judge Mark Herron ruled the woman was sexually abused by Cable as a child.

Judge Herron said the abuse happened after Cable engaged in "grooming behaviour" when he first met the plaintiff in the late 1960s that included sexualised conversations.

Cable, who turns 80 in September, has always categorically denied all the allegations and has never been charged.

The woman's claim was heard in a civil case over several days in February last year.

Woman begins 'road to recovery'

In a statement read by her lawyer Michael Magazanik outside court, the woman said today's decision "clears a giant obstacle for my road to recovery".

"Finally, the truth is confirmed by a court and I am recognised for having told the truth for decades," she said in the statement.

"The past 50-plus years have taken their toll, because so much was taken from me as a child.

"As is the case for so many abuse survivors, it took me decades to go to the police and, as is so common, the system failed me."

The woman thanked the four police officers – Chris Italiano, Jo Connoley, Bill Manners and Mick Miller — who fought to take her case to trial.

She also thanked the four "brave" women who gave evidence in the case.

Call for Hall of Fame explusion

Mr Magazanik called for Cable to be expelled from the AFL Hall of Fame and stripped of all of his honours, including his MBE.

In a statement, the AFL said it "acknowledges the court's findings today and has no further update at this stage".

But the league confirmed the AFL Commission had approved a change to the Hall of Fame rules that would give the committee the power to "suspend or revoke the Hall of Fame membership of a player, coach or official who was convicted of an indictable offence in court, or engaged in conduct prejudicial to the interests of the game".

Any Hall of Fame members subject to this process would have the chance to respond, and the final decision on whether any Hall of Fame or Legend status was revoked would be made by the AFL Commission.

The rule change does not come into effect until after this year's Australian Football Hall of Fame induction ceremony, to be held on June 27.

'A very long journey'

Mr Magazanik said it had been a "very long journey" for her to bring Cable to justice.

"She's very relieved to have won, and is grateful the court listened to her and the witnesses and that Barry Cable has been exposed as a paedophile," Mr Magazanik said.

He said the woman had provided a very detailed statement to police in 1998 and while officers had deemed there was enough evidence to charge Cable, the DPP found there was an "insufficient prospect of conviction".

The woman's legal action followed changes to WA law which allowed people who claimed they had been sexually abused to sue those they alleged were responsible.

The standard of proof for civil cases is "the balance of probabilities", while in any criminal case, the allegations have be proven to a higher standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt".

Woman unlikely to receive money

Mr Magazanik said his client pushed on "against the odds", despite Cable spending "hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to get her claim kicked out" once it finally made it to court.

"All of this was painful for my client, but she never gave up," Mr Magazanik said.

While the woman was awarded $818,700, it is unlikely she will receive any money because the court was told the month before the trial, Cable had been declared bankrupt.

He said the woman never expected to get any money from Cable.

"It was never about the money for my client. It's always been about exposing the truth, and vindication, and that's what she got today."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016541

File: f5988f8dbb92bd0⋯.jpg (224.88 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Barry_Cable_was_at_the_hei….jpg)

File: 08a7857c80d6313⋯.jpg (112.07 KB,1287x905,1287:905,Barry_Cable_was_an_assista….jpg)

File: 1a59b45bea389ae⋯.jpg (1.8 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Roger_Cook_says_a_lot_has_….jpg)

File: bb2b481cf20454f⋯.jpg (75.09 KB,823x750,823:750,The_football_world_was_roc….jpg)

>>19016533

2/2

'I salute their bravery'

He also thanked the four women who came forward to testify against Cable.

"All of them found the experience of giving evidence painful and traumatic," he said.

"All of them took a stand for the truth despite the personal cost.

"I salute their bravery and express my deep gratitude to those women."

When asked whether criminal proceedings should follow today's ruling, Mr Magazanik said it was a "no brainer" that police should pursue the case.

He said none of the women stood to gain anything financially from coming forward.

"They all came forward because they were brave and decent and wanted to see justice done."

Identity revealed

The proceedings started with Judge Herron lifting wide-ranging suppression orders on Cable's identity, which were put in place when the woman started her legal action in March 2019.

Cable was not represented by a lawyer at the trial and did not take any part in the proceedings, instead relying on material he had already filed with the court to defend himself.

His son requested, in emails to the court, to represent his father but the judge ruled that was only possible if Cable was present in court with him.

The trial included evidence from four other women who alleged they also were abused by Cable when they were young girls — three of them came forward only after hearing details of the trial.

They all testified they did not report what happened to police because Cable was famous, and they did not think anyone would believe them.

'Pattern of behaviour' established

Judge Herron accepted the evidence of the four other women who testified at the trial that they too had been sexually abused by Cable.

"I am satisfied the facts or the circumstances of the child sexual abuse as described by the four witnesses establishes a pattern of behaviour engaged in by the defendant," he said.

However, he said he was not persuaded the evidence they gave about being abused in the 1980s and 1990s made it more likely that he had a sexual interest in children at the time he abused the woman in the 60s and 70s.

Therefore, the judge said he could use the evidence only in a limited way.

Premier welcomes ruling

WA Premier Roger Cook said he was pleased the ruling was able to bring closure for the victim, describing the case as "harrowing".

"I think we should all be grateful and just admire the courage of that woman to come forward not only now as an adult, but when she made her initial statements back in 1998," Mr Cook said.

Lauded football career

Cable is widely regarded as one of the greatest West Australian footballers of all time, after a lengthy and successful career in the Victorian and West Australian football leagues.

He won two VFL premierships with North Melbourne — a club he went on to coach — as well as four WAFL premierships and three Sandover medals for being the competition's best and fairest player.

The court was told the sexual abuse happened when he was at the height of his playing career.

The allegations included that Cable attempted to rape her in the change rooms at the Perth Football Club.

Two of the other women who testified at the trial said Cable was the coach of the North Melbourne Football Club when he assaulted them.

While the woman was awarded $818,700, it is unlikely she will receive any money because the court was told the month before the trial, Cable had been declared bankrupt.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-16/barry-cable-civil-case-gulity-damages-awarded/102480920

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016566

File: 6d068e11ae6a9ca⋯.jpg (572.43 KB,5472x3648,3:2,Scott_Morrison_meets_with_….jpg)

File: d87ec5c1caa6044⋯.jpg (1.99 MB,5568x3712,3:2,Scott_Morrison_with_then_B….jpg)

Morrison warns against age of self-loathing, Western guilt

Rob Harris - June 16, 2023

Oxford: Scott Morrison says Chinese President Xi Jinping must be regarded as a serious figure who “means exactly what he says”, as he warned Beijing could be encouraged to seize Taiwan if the West does not strongly support Ukraine and start to reverse a fading belief in liberal values.

The former prime minister used a speech to Britain’s Oxford Union, one of the world’s most prestigious debating chambers, to express concern that digital echo chambers and so-called cancel culture have fuelled enthusiasm for society to disown past transgressions without appreciating reasons for success.

He told the democratic world it must be careful how it judges those responsible for abhorrent practices of the past, warning that the enemies of freedom will welcome an appetite for self-loathing with “open arms”.

Morrison, in the United Kingdom for an event to mark the 40th anniversary of the International Democrat Union, an alliance of centre-right political parties, said the like-minded nations would need “true believers” in the fight for peace, freedom and respect for human dignity, arguing that China would be buoyed in its quest to seize Taiwan if the West’s support for Ukraine was to dry up.

In a question-and-answer session with university students, Morrison said President Xi, who he had personally met twice, was an “old-fashion marxist” who was “not making it up”.

“He believes in China’s destiny very much,” he told the audience.

“That’s why I find his assertiveness convincing… because he means it. And we’ve seen that before. And that’s what, I think, should be taken so seriously.”

Morrison said Xi had begun a third revolution, with a more authoritarian system at home and a more ambitious foreign policy abroad, which had also led to the unravelling of the Deng-era economic reforms.

“We also see in Xi Jinping, I think, him trying to redefine the culture. He’s blending a heavily nationalist culture, and he’s now trying to connect it with a historical reference, Confucianism, which was previously rejected by the communists in China,” he said. “And now he’s trying to connect to a new understanding of what communism is in China, a Xi-style communism.”

Morrison said the deterrent effect of a Western-backed Ukrainian victory would help change Beijing’s calculus about whether it should invade Taiwan. He urged the British and Europeans not to succumb to “passive acquiescence” in China’s strategy, an outcome that China was “counting on”.

“Beijing’s calculus on Taiwan will not just be determined by relative assessments of military capabilities and posture … it will be determined by their perceived assessment of the West’s resolve,” he said.

“Failure to provide a clear and credible deterrent can become an invitation for conflict. This was the tragedy of the 1930s, which Churchill warned against. We cannot repeat that mistake.”

He also warned that China had broader designs to usher developing countries into a new world order.

Morrison cautioned the West risks surrendering its optimism, frightening children and forfeiting confidence in freedom and representative democracy as it tries to overcome the many challenges it faces, including climate change.

“My concern is that we have entered an age of self-loathing and Western guilt,” he said.

“It is highly arrogant to think our generation would have easily translated our present-day morality to earlier times had we been there.

“This is not to deny our faults or the many egregious injustices they produced. But it is possible to acknowledge our faults without condemning our society. We must assess our past with humility and grace. When we rightly denounce abhorrent practices of the past, let us also be careful how we judge those now in their graves.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/morrison-warns-against-age-of-self-loathing-western-guilt-20230615-p5dgrg.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016596

File: f58329953f07f9e⋯.jpg (401.09 KB,1297x1034,1297:1034,EORIA_1.jpg)

File: 961839838e6b2ff⋯.jpg (105.34 KB,1354x900,677:450,353832979_596004309326809_….jpg)

>>19011145

Embassy of Russia in Australia Facebook Post

15 June 2023

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov:

«To our regret, Australia diligently continues to move in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria that is now taking place in the Western countries. Australia is trying to be an excellent student there».

https://tass.com/politics/1632779

https://www.facebook.com/RusEmbAu/posts/596004312660142

Australia diligently continues to move in main stream of Russophobic hysteria - Kremlin

Dmitry Peskov pointed out that the Russian side will take the new unfriendly lunge into account

tass.com - 15 JUN, 2023

MOSCOW, June 15. /TASS/. Australia, having cancelled the lease agreement for the site for the construction of the new Russian embassy building, diligently continues to move forward in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria and tries to distinguish itself on this path, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

"To our regret, Australia diligently continues to move in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria that is now taking place in the Western countries. Australia is trying to be an excellent student there," the Kremlin spokesman told reporters on Thursday, commenting on Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's statement about introducing a relevant bill to parliament.

Peskov pointed out that the Russian side will take the new unfriendly lunge into account. "Another unfriendly display from Australia. We will take this into account and if there are issues on the agenda that require the principle of reciprocity, we will act accordingly," he promised.

Earlier, the Australian Prime Minister announced the introduction of a new bill in the country's parliament on the cancellation of the lease agreement for the construction of the new Russian embassy building. According to Albanese, the main reason for the decision to terminate the lease, the legality of which was previously confirmed by the Federal Court of Australia, is security requirements. The prime minister promised to act "quickly to ensure the leased site does not become a formal diplomatic presence". According to the Australian government, the problem lies in the location of the theoretical second Russian embassy building. It is "directly adjacent to Parliament House," which the Australian authorities say poses a threat to national security.

The Russian embassy in Australia stated that the bill to terminate the lease is "another step by Anthony Albanese towards a deliberate and systematic destruction of relations with Moscow." It is expected that the bill on the forced termination of the lease, which has been submitted to Parliament by Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil, will be passed as soon as possible.

https://tass.com/politics/1632779

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016648

File: 3868aa206265450⋯.jpg (177.51 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Sensitive_federal_agencies….jpg)

File: d0e555c4054a5d3⋯.jpg (53.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_Home_Affairs_….jpg)

Fears government data has been stolen by cyber criminals grow as law firm’s clients are revealed

ELLEN WHINNETT - JUNE 16, 2023

1/2

The Albanese government has established a crisis group to examine what commonwealth data has been stolen by Russian-linked hackers who infiltrated the systems of HWL Ebsworth, the giant law firm that has tens of millions of dollars of contracts across at least 40 government departments and agencies.

Sensitive agencies including Home Affairs, the Australian Federal Police, Australian Taxation Office, Department of Defence, Department of Foreign Affairs and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions are among those feared to have been impacted by the hack.

Forensic cyber experts and national security agencies are now working to determine what commonwealth information is among the four terabytes of data stolen by Russia-linked ransomware gang BlackCat, also known as AlphV or AlphaSpider.

The Attorney-General’s Department has established a working group to examine the impact of the data leaks. There are deep concerns within government that data including information on vulnerable people may have been compromised, along with legal advice that could prove deeply embarrassing to the government, its predecessor and its agencies.

While the hackers did not infiltrate government computers, it is understood they did access information provided by government agencies to HWL Ebsworth, and likely also obtained data and advice provided by the firm to its government clients.

The giant law firm specialises in government work, spruiks on its website that it is the only firm appointed to all Australian government legal service panels, and advertises 25 partners who specialise in government work.

A search of the AusTender website shows there are more than 1600 individual current or recently expired contracts or panel agreements between government departments and the law firm, worth tens of millions of dollars.

The Australian has been told there are daily meetings occurring across government as agencies race to determine what data has been accessed, and how damaging any potential release of the data would be.

The hackers published 1.2 terabytes of the data earlier this month, but their site, on the dark web, is currently offline. The hack is believed to have occurred in April, and was reported to the government on May 1.

Most departments contacted by The Australian on Thursday referred inquiries to HWL Ebsworth, but the firm would not comment on its clients. “The privacy and security of our client and employee data remains of the utmost importance,’’ it said in a statement. “We acknowledge and understand the impact this may have, and we continue to communicate closely with our clients.

“We continue to work with the Australian Cyber Security Centre, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and all relevant government authorities and law enforcement. We will continue to provide updates as we progress our response.’’

Agencies and departments including Prime Minister and Cabinet, Treasury, Finance, Education, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Industry, Science and Resources, Employment, and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade are all either current or recent clients of the firm, or have panel agreements with it.

The Fair Work Ombudsman, Parliamentary Budget Office, Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, ASIC and Services Australia are also clients.

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner – the nation’s privacy watchdog – confirmed on Wednesday it had lost data to the hackers. But The Australian has been told the OAIC breach was “the tip of the iceberg’’ and the likely loss of data extended across the government.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016654

File: ee9cf83ec172004⋯.jpg (121.17 KB,928x600,116:75,Opposition_cyber_security_….jpg)

>>19016648

2/2

Cyber Security Minister Clare O’Neil’s office confirmed it was investigating the potential impact on government data.

A spokesman refused to say how many agencies were clients of the law firm and had been impacted by the hack, referring all questions to HWL Ebsworth.

“The government continues to actively engage HWL Ebsworth as it investigates the extent of the breach, including impacts on commonwealth information,” the spokesman said.

“HWL Ebsworth first reported a cyber incident involving ransomware and claims of data exfiltration and publication to the dark web on 1 May 2023.

“The government is working with HWL Ebsworth to understand and manage potential consequences of the publication of the data. As this matter is the subject of an ongoing joint investigation between the AFP and Victoria Police, it would not be appropriate to comment further.”

Ms O’Neil would not comment on what Home Affairs data may have been compromised.

The AFP, which has multiple contracts with the firm, also declined to comment on what data the hackers may have accessed.

The Australian Electoral Commission said: “Attorney-General’s Department has established a working group to assess the exposure of commonwealth data as a result of the HWL Ebsworth data incident. Questions about that data incident are best directed to the Attorney-General’s Department.’’

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus’s office referred questions to the department, which said: “It would not be appropriate for the Attorney-General’s Department to disclose details about its engagement of legal services providers. A co-ordinated whole-of-government approach is currently under way to support agencies’ response to the HWL Ebsworth cyber incident.’’

The ATO said it “could not comment publicly on the specifics of our cyber security posture’’ but was aware of the incident. It urged taxpayers to be alert to contact the ATO if they found access to online systems had been affected.

The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission confirmed it “had been made aware of the data breach by HWL Ebsworth Lawyers affecting commission information”.

“We will continue to engage with the firm who is working with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and other relevant government agencies,’’ the commission said.

A spokeswoman for Defence Minister Richard Marles would not comment on what Defence data may have been impacted, saying: “Specific inquiries relating to this incident should be directed to HWL Ebsworth.’’

Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s office referred questions to DFAT, which did not respond.

While the government was first made aware of the breach on May 1, it does not appear anyone has been notified of a breach, under the requirements of the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme, which was introduced in 2018 and requires organisations to notify people at risk of “serious harm’’ within 30 days.

Opposition cyber security spokesman James Paterson said: “The government must come clean about to what extent other departments and agencies have been affected … given the firm is such a significant provider of services to the government.

“They must also be upfront about whether citizens’ privacy has been impacted. Australians have the right to know if other government data has been lost.’’

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/fears-government-data-has-been-stolen-by-cyber-criminals-grow-as-law-firms-clients-are-revealed/news-story/aba017296626a3caa4c210cc29411611

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016676

File: 43250c605eae4fc⋯.jpg (169.03 KB,1280x720,16:9,Russian_cyber_hackers_have….jpg)

File: 9bb2d7d8212d437⋯.jpg (84.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,Parliament_House_in_Canber….jpg)

>>19016648

Data on secret missile testing site, attack helicopters and police operations stolen by hackers

ELLEN WHINNETT - JUNE 16, 2023

1/2

Russian cyber hackers who infiltrated the computer systems of law firm HWL Ebsworth have obtained government files apparently relating to the top-secret Woomera missile testing site, navy’s attack helicopter replacement project and Australia’s politically sensitive enhanced engagement in the Indo-Pacific.

Sources said The hack – one of the largest in Australian history – had also seen the ransomware gang ­obtain documents concerning police intelligence about protests at an immigration detention centre, the escape of prisoners, and projects involving special forces.

While a court injunction ­obtained by the giant law firm has sought to limit public knowledge of the content of the hacked documents, The Weekend Australian can ­reveal there is deep concern and fury in Canberra, where at least 45 departments and agencies fear data they shared with HWL Ebsworth has been compromised.

The Defence Department, a major client, appears particularly exposed, with monthly ­reports updating work on ­defence matters leaked and ­published online by the hackers, known as BlackCat/AlphV or Alpha Spider.

Other data stolen includes an unknown number of driver’s ­licences, including names, dates of birth and photos, employment contracts, briefs of evidence, legal negotiations and consent orders.

National intelligence agencies are also caught up in the hack, with numerous documents relating to the Australian Federal Police, the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission and Austrac, and one document to ASIO. The Australian Signals Directorate, one of the agencies working to shut down the data leak and track the hackers to their bases offshore, is also caught up in the hack, with documents relating to the ASD among the 1.4 terabytes published so far from the 4 terabytes that were stolen.

More than 2.5 million documents were compromised by the hackers, who gained access to HWL Ebsworth’s Melbourne servers after obtaining a mid-ranking lawyer’s credentials in April. Once inside the law firm’s system, the hackers accessed the drives of almost 2000 employees, copying their downloads, documents and other data.

The Weekend Australian has been told the data hack is being widely discussed within the cyber security industry, and is known to have been downloaded multiple times in overseas jurisdictions.

Sources in Canberra said that while a Russian-linked criminal ransomware gang had stolen the data, it was “inevitable’’ that state actor adversaries, such as Russia and China, would have downloaded the data and would be closely examining it.

The Attorney-General’s ­Department has established a working group to deal with the fallout of the hack, while a crisis committee has been established across government, with daily meetings of senior officials trying to work out what documents have been taken.

The Weekend Australia has been told one Defence-related document relates to the redevelopment of the top-secret ­Woomera missile testing site in South Australia. Another is about the $3bn plan to replace Australia’s fleet of Taipan attack helicopters with Seahawk Romeo combat helicopters at the HMAS Albatross naval base near Nowra.

One document relates to the Indo-Pacific enhanced engagement strategy, which is designed to counter Chinese influence in the Pacific. A source said it related to infrastructure projects in Solomon Islands.

Other documents are about asylum-seeker boats approaching Australia, joint South Australian-Australian Federal Police intelligence and planning for a protest. Others relate to the escape of ­detainees from an immigration detention centre and the seizing by the navy of two Russian fishing vessels some years ago. A number of invoices have also been made public.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016686

File: 7c69aa962efab84⋯.jpg (76.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Juan_Martinez_managing_par….jpg)

>>19016676

2/2

While the Albanese government is largely refusing to say what data has been leaked, two agencies – the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission – have confirmed they lost data.

The Australian Taxation Office didn’t directly confirm it had lost data but warned people to be on the lookout for suspicious online activities, while the ­commonwealth DPP said on ­Friday it was “participating in the whole-of-government response to the HWL Ebsworth cyber incident”.

Opposition cyber security spokesman James Paterson expressed deep concern about the leaking of commonwealth data from sensitive agencies, including the Department of Home ­Affairs, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner.

“Protecting Australian government data is more important than ever in light of recent significant cyber incidents and our current strategic environment,’’ Senator Paterson said. “The Albanese government must take every action necessary to secure the compromised data.”

Cyber Security Minister Clare O’Neil said the government had “been on the ground since day one at HWL Ebsworth, helping them manage the technical incident, understand the implications of the breach and support their customers’’.

“When we arrived in office, there was no meaningful cyber incident response function in the Australian government,” Ms O’Neill said. “Today, the management of these incidents – where my department, the Australian Signals Directorate, the Australian Federal Police and the company itself work in partnership to manage these incidents – is integral to our overall national cyber resilience.’’

A Defence Department spokesperson said HWL Ebsworth had advised it of the ransomware attack. “This is not an attack on Defence ICT,’’ the spokesperson said.

“Defence is actively engaging with HWL Ebsworth as part of the whole-of-government response to his incident, to determine the extent of the attack.’’

The Australian Federal Police declined to comment.

HWL Ebsworth, run by managing partner Juan Martinez, is one of Australia’s largest law firms, and has contracts across government worth tens of millions of dollars. The company said it ­understood and acknowledged “the impact that this issue has had on all affected clients and we have maintained close contact with them”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/data-on-secret-missile-testing-site-attack-helicopters-and-police-operations-stolen-by-hackers/news-story/abbbee6ed3aa2e0bdc0f05b4bc723eca

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016711

File: a37ccab3c93dc73⋯.jpg (240.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Melbourne_man_32_is_in_c….jpg)

File: 6a8919707b1d226⋯.jpg (727.84 KB,1964x2619,1964:2619,Images_from_a_joint_police….jpg)

‘State warcraft’: Police won’t cop $1.7bn worth of meth imports

ANGELICA SNOWDEN - JUNE 15, 2023

Federal police say international crime groups and “state actors” are threatening the rules-based order of democracies such as Australia by working together to smuggle illicit drugs, after revealing they had seized $1.7bn worth of meth bound for Victoria and NSW.

In an extraordinary five-month operation, the Australian Federal Police, Victoria Police and other national crime-busting organisations worked with the Five Eyes law enforcement group to capture more than six tonnes of liquid and crystal methamphetamine since December last year.

The illicit substance arrived in four separate sea cargo shipments, and originated from Canada.

The drugs were replaced with a harmless substance but had it landed, almost 19 million street deals could have taken place.

After police charged six men over the attempted drug importation following raids on homes and a storage unit in Melbourne on Wednesday, AFP assistant commissioner Hilda Sirec identified for the first time a disturbing new trend in global ­organised crime.

“While organised crime and drug trafficking are not new, what is emerging is the trafficking of illicit drugs in state warcraft,” she said.

“In parts of the world, some state actors appear to be working with organised crime to distribute illicit drugs to regions in a bid to undermine societies and democracy.

“This challenges our rules-based order and the rule of law at levels never before seen.”

The AFP would not reveal which country or countries they believe are the state actors, nor would they name the group involved.

Canadian authorities informed the AFP in January that one shipment with 2900 litres of liquid meth contained in 180 bottles of canola oil was destined for Australia. This shipment alone would have been worth $720m.

In May, Canadian authorities seized a further 325 litres of liquid meth, also concealed in canola oil bottles. These had an estimated street value of $81m.

And this month, they seized another massive haul – 2900 litres of liquid meth worth $717m, also hidden in canola oil bottles.

The same syndicate responsible for the three attempted liquid meth imports was also linked to an attempt to traffic 200kg of crystal meth to Australia in December last year. That bust was worth $180m and was also seized by Canadian authorities.

Canada Border Services Agency regional director-general for the Pacific region, Nina Patel said officers in British Columbia had seized more than 6330kg of methamphetamine over the past six months, all destined for Australia.

“One seizure alone was the largest methamphetamine seizure in the CBSA’s history at almost 3000kg,” she said.

“We are proud to have worked alongside the Australian Federal Police, the Australian Border Force and our partners at the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to combat organised crime and protect our communities.”

New Zealand police made a significant seizure of crystal meth — 713kg — in January as well, and authorities believe the same group is responsible for that haul as the foiled plot to import meth into Australia.

Six men have been charged in total over the attempted meth imports into Australia, two for allegedly attempting to source the drugs and four for allegedly trying to buy them.

On Wednesday, police allegedly uncovered a clandestine lab while they were executing seven search warrants across Melbourne’s CBD and in the city’s west.

It was found at a property in Sunshine North, about 30 minutes west of the city, during raids on the homes and a storage unit belonging to three men charged with attempting to possess a commercial quantity of unlawfully imported border-controlled drugs.

They are a 28-year-old Sunshine North man, a 26-year-old US national and a 19-year-old St Albans man.

Police will allege a 38-year-old man from Melbourne’s CBD, who was charged with the same offence, knows a conduit for an organised crime network in Canada and is the “primary onshore facilitator” for the transport of one attempted meth import.

The man police believe is a “professional facilitator” is a 32-year-old from Melbourne’s CBD, who used his position in a logistics business to transport the substituted meth when it arrived in Australia.

He has been attempting to ­possess and import a commercial quantity of unlawfully imported border controlled drugs.

Another man, a 51-year-old from Melbourne’s CBD, has been charged. All six are expected to ­appear at the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/state-warcraft-police-wont-cop-17bn-worth-of-meth-imports/news-story/cdb6f3eb97af388c78a6b42a73af9bba

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016850

File: fbf3a7942a342f6⋯.jpg (147.59 KB,768x1025,768:1025,SAS_Corporal_Ben_Roberts_S….jpg)

File: ad81b047d0d5cad⋯.jpg (113.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_defence_spokesm….jpg)

>>18934029

>>19005517

War crimes ‘will be prosecuted’ says Andrew Hastie

BEN PACKHAM - JUNE 14, 2023

Opposition defence spokesman and former SAS captain Andrew Hastie says he is confident special forces war criminals will be brought to justice despite the collapse of a five-year investigation into allegations of murder against Australia’s most decorated soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith.

The Australian Federal Police defended its conduct on Wednesday after it was forced to junk its investigation into Mr Roberts-Smith’s alleged involvement in the execution of three Afghan prisoners, amid concerns over tainted evidence.

The AFP and detectives from the nation’s war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator, have now started a fresh probe into the alleged murders, which sources warn could take years.

Mr Hastie said he was not privy to the reasons behind the decision, but declared: “The Office of the Special Investigator is active”.

He told the ABC: “They are doing their jobs and I am confident that they will still continue on with the work that needs to be done to bring a finality to this whole, sad, sorry affair.”

The AFP said it had relied on expert legal advice in using information from the Inspector General of the Australian Defence Force inquiry, conducted by Justice Paul Brereton, which had coercive powers to compel testimony by witnesses.

It said it “compartmentalised” evidence provided by the IGADF, because of the legal risks involved, and presented its evidence on two matters to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions in 2020 and 2022.

But it said the CDPP decided in March this year it could not prosecute two alleged war crimes offences based on the evidence provided.

“The AFP has acted in good faith and professionally at all times during some of the most complex investigations the AFP has ever undertaken,” an AFP spokeswoman said. “Now the IGADF Inquiry is finalised, the joint OSI/AFP investigation – Operation Emerald – is the appropriate framework to investigate these matters.”

The spokeswoman said the Operation Emerald investigation would be undertaken “as expeditiously as possible”.

Mr Hastie praised the soldiers who gave evidence against Mr Roberts-Smith in his failed defamation case against Nine newspapers, saying they had demonstrated the SAS regiment had “a moral pulse”.

The West Australian Liberal MP, who also gave evidence against Mr Roberts-Smith during the defamation case, said he felt a sense of relief that “the cold hard truth” of the allegations against the Victoria Cross recipient had been “validated by a Federal Court justice”. He said the possible disbandment of the regiment had been a live issue several years ago, but those who had stood up to call out the SAS’s “toxic culture” had ultimately rescued the regiment.

Mr Hastie also warned against politicisation of the Brereton Report, saying it was “not about left or right”, or about one media organisation versus another.

“In the end, it is a simple question of morality,” he said.

“It’s right versus wrong. It’s the rule of law versus the rule of the jungle. And, to put it very simply, Australian soldiers do not execute non-combatants who have been taken as prisoners.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/war-crimes-will-be-prosecuted-says-andrew-hastie/news-story/1d5a4d1f8c63e238e80d79e4ab08dfab

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016902

File: c50bbaaa07acd61⋯.mp4 (15.92 MB,640x360,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_flies_ba….mp4)

>>18934029

No apologies as Roberts-Smith returns to Australia following defamation judgment

Alex Crowe and Rebecca Peppiatt - June 15, 2023

Former SAS corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has ruled out apologising to the families of the victims affected by his actions in Afghanistan.

Roberts-Smith – arriving into Perth on a Qantas flight shortly after 9pm on Wednesday – said he was devastated by the outcome of his high-profile defamation case against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times, adding that he was “100 per cent” proud of his behaviour while serving in the Defence Force.

It is the first time Roberts-Smith has spoken publicly since the case ended, spending the days prior to the court judgment in Bali.

He was seen in Queenstown in New Zealand on Wednesday afternoon alongside his girlfriend, Sarah Matulin. They were reportedly checking in for a business-class flight.

“It was a terrible result and obviously the incorrect result. We will look at it and consider whether or not we need to file an appeal,” Roberts-Smith said upon arrival in Perth.

“There is not much more I can say about it … we just have to work through it and I’ll take the advice as it comes.”

Asked if he would be apologising to the families of the victims affected by his actions in Afghanistan, Roberts-Smith said: “We haven’t done anything wrong, so we won’t be making any apologies.”

As Roberts-Smith walked to pick up his bags, he was approached by members of the public who asked if they could shake his hand.

Roberts-Smith, who was picked up in a car outside Perth Airport, will face intense scrutiny on his return to Australia.

He was not in court for the release of the judgment, which found the media outlets had proven the truth of allegations he was involved in war crimes, murder and bullying. Roberts-Smith had attended every day of the 110-day trial.

The disgraced Victoria Cross holder is returning amid investigations into potential war crimes and suspected witness intimidation during the defamation trial.

Roberts-Smith had been spotted in Wanaka in recent days. A witness who testified in support of the former Seven Network executive in the defamation trial owns a property in New Zealand. Known as Person 35 in the trial, the former soldier’s identity was suppressed by the court.

Justice Anthony Besanko found in his judgment that Person 35 had talked to other witnesses supporting Roberts-Smith in detail before testifying. Justice Besanko also noted it was unusual that Channel Seven had paid the legal costs of Person 35 and other witnesses.

Roberts-Smith’s arrival back in Australia follows revelations the five-year Australian Federal Police inquiry into the former soldier’s alleged involvement in the execution of three Afghan captives had collapsed.

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) decided not to prosecute Roberts-Smith based on evidence gathered during the AFP probe, leading to a new joint taskforce being set up to investigate the alleged executions.

The taskforce comprises detectives from the specialist war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator and a new team of federal police investigators not connected to the abandoned AFP probe.

The CDPP concluded in March that the five-year AFP probe should not lead to a prosecution because of the risk it was unwittingly compromised by the receipt of certain information from the Brereton inquiry, a military inspector-general probe that ran from 2016 to 2020 and used special coercive powers to question SAS soldiers.

The potentially tainted AFP inquiries centred on the alleged execution of two Afghan prisoners at the Whiskey 108 compound on Easter Sunday in 2009 and an incident in which Roberts-Smith allegedly participated in the murder of civilian Ali Jan in September 2012.

Liberal MP Andrew Hastie spoke publicly for the first time since the defamation trial on Wednesday, expressing relief the verdict went against Roberts-Smith.

The former SAS captain, who had been subpoenaed to give evidence, told the ABC the men who spoke out had rescued the regiment.

Hastie said, despite the politicisation of the Brereton report and the defamation case, it wasn’t about left or right or one media corporation versus another.

“In the end, it’s a simple question of morality,” he said. “It’s right versus wrong. It’s the rule of law versus the rule of the jungle. And to put it very simply, Australian soldiers do not execute non-combatants who have been taken as prisoners.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/ben-roberts-smith-spotted-checking-into-flight-in-new-zealand-20230614-p5dgmj.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19016940

File: 5b3a62fd7630615⋯.jpg (1.6 MB,3840x2160,16:9,The_Hawkei_protected_mobil….jpg)

>>18949906

>>18960257

>>18998479

Ukraine’s plea for Hawkei vehicles ‘unsupportable at this time’, government letter says

Matthew Knott - June 16, 2023

The Albanese government says it is unable to send Hawkei protected mobility vehicles to Ukraine in the near future despite increasingly desperate pleas from Kyiv, citing braking issues and a lack of spare parts.

Ukraine has been requesting a fleet of Australian-made Hawkeis since September and the country’s Ministry of Defence has taken to social media in recent months to declare the vehicle its new “military crush”.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is to announce a new package of support for Ukraine during or just before his visit to the NATO summit in Lithuania in July, but Ukraine’s top request for assistance looks unlikely to feature in the announcement.

In a letter sent to a member of the public earlier this month on behalf of Defence Minister Richard Marles, a senior Department of Defence official said: “We are aware of calls to provide [the] Hawkei to Ukraine.

“The Hawkei is a developmental vehicle that is only now being introduced into service across the ADF [Australian Defence Force].

“The combination of an unresolved braking issue and a limited supply of parts means that the gifting of the Hawkei is unsupportable at this time.

“The government is considering options for further support to Ukraine, which it will announce in due course.”

Members of the Ukrainian-Australian community have been running a #freetheHawkei campaign including rallies across the country and a large billboard near Canberra Airport that greets federal politicians arriving in the capital.

Army Major General Andrew Bottrell told Senate estimates earlier this month that “it’s been my advice to Defence that we could not sustain this vehicle overseas, and we certainly could not sustain it if we were also trying to roll it out to the Australian Defence Force”.

The Hawkei, manufactured by defence contractor Thales at its Bendigo plant, has been plagued with braking problems during the development process.

The Ukrainian government has insisted it is unbothered by the braking issue because it believes the vehicles will still perform well in off-road environments and at relatively low speeds.

“I know there are some technical issues, but we believe these Hawkeis can be road-tested in war conditions,” said Stefan Romaniw, the co-chair of the Australian Federation of Ukrainian Organisations.

“Ukraine would be prepared to do that.”

Australia has provided $510 million in military assistance to Ukraine, but the only aid announced this year was a $33 million donation of unarmed drones in February.

Romaniw urged the government to deliver its next assistance package swiftly, saying it was crucial for Ukraine to make ground against Russia during its European spring and summer military campaign.

“We see this war in real-time: there is fighting going on now, people are being killed now,” he said.

“This new package needs to be substantial to make sure Australia gets back to being the top non-NATO contributor because we’ve slipped a bit.”

Other options for the upcoming military package include additional supplies of ammunition, Bushmaster four-wheel drive vehicles and M113 armoured personnel carriers.

The federal opposition last week said it was embarrassing that Ukrainian officials had been forced to resort to social media posts to plead for more Australian military assistance.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham and defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said they “share the growing concerns of many in the Australian-Ukrainian community and, it would seem, the government of Ukraine that Australia is no longer pulling our weight commensurate with the efforts of our partners”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/ukraine-s-plea-for-hawkei-vehicles-unsupportable-at-this-time-government-letter-says-20230616-p5dh1w.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021590

File: 6c0e9f9a07918ad⋯.jpg (208.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,David_Van_has_formally_res….jpg)

File: a79f9099c405b4e⋯.jpg (106.33 KB,1283x1589,1283:1589,FyzyaoGacAEfdm_.jpg)

>>19005499

>>19016472

‘Disregard for due process’: David Van resigns from Liberal Party following sexual harassment allegations

SARAH ISON - JUNE 17, 2023

Victorian Senator David Van has formally resigned from the Liberal Party after what he has described as “wholesale disregard for due process and natural justice” in the handling of numerous sexual harassment allegations levelled against him.

The Victorian Senator on Saturday wrote to Victorian Liberal Party president Greg Mirabella to say he was resigning his membership effective immediately.

“I cannot remain a member of a party that tramples upon the very premise on which our justice system is predicated,” he said in the letter.

“This is a travesty of justice and I reiterate that I deny the allegations made against me.

“I also acknowledging the cruel irony of doing so amidst public discourse about the weaponisation of allegations and the role of the rule of law which has at its centre the presumption of innocence.”

It followed Peter Dutton on Friday urging Senator Van to leave the party, as Liberals sought to distance themselves from the Victorian Senator.

“I think it’s in everyone’s best interests that he resign from the parliament and I hope he’s able to do that sooner than later and seek the help that he needs, and I think that would be an appropriate next step,” Mr Dutton told 2GB radio.

“In terms of the decision to expel him from the party, well, that’s a decision for the party in each of the state divisions. We are a separate body in each state and territory, as is the case with the Labor Party.”

The pressure for Senator Van to resign came despite his agreement to leave the Liberal party room on Thursday after Mr Dutton revealed he had been made aware of numerous incidents involving Senator Van.

Former Queensland Liberal Senator, Amanda Stoker, was among those who accused Senator Van of harassment, alleging he had groped her in 2020 and that she had made an internal complaint. Ms Stoker said the incident was dealt with and she received an apology and assurance it would never happen again.

The revelations came after Independent Senator Thorpe used parliamentary privilege to allege Senator Van had sexually assaulted her.

While withdrawing the sensational accusation, Senator Thorpe told the upper house on Thursday Senator Van was among many men who made her “feel unsafe”, some of whom had assaulted and “propositioned” her.

It is understood that Senator Van faces a third allegation of harassment, but that the woman involved does not wish to go public with her accusation.

Senator Van said he was “deeply distressed and hurt” to have not been afforded procedural fairness in relation to the claims of harassment against him.

“I acknowledge the hundreds of members, friends and my family, who have shown me support in my final days as a member. I am grateful for their belief in my honesty and integrity,” he said.

“I have worked tirelessly for the party and fought hard for its beliefs over many years. I will continue to fight for what I thought were the party’s values.”

Senator Van will remain in the upper house, sitting as an independent.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/disregard-for-due-process-david-van-resigns-from-liberal-party-following-sexual-harassment-allegations/news-story/73c99b552d9cb43ba9adb11889afacec

https://twitter.com/AmyRemeikis/status/1669976107163213824

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021634

File: ac5618be7fff4d7⋯.mp4 (14.53 MB,960x540,16:9,_Uluru_had_no_problem_numb….mp4)

File: b3423a410a0007c⋯.jpg (955.32 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,Uluru_Statement.jpg)

File: cd33fa6539dbb14⋯.jpg (328.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Elders_from_Central_Austra….jpg)

File: 67094af028519ee⋯.jpg (93.91 KB,768x1024,3:4,Senator_Kerrynne_Liddle.jpg)

File: a19aa018c1f52a2⋯.jpg (104 KB,768x1024,3:4,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>18928670

Uluru Statement from the Heart signatories ‘unhappy’ with Indigenous voice to parliament Yes ‘consent’

SARAH ISON - JUNE 17, 2023

Numerous signatories of the Uluru Statement from the Heart were “surprised” to see their names on the document that calls for an indigenous voice to parliament and “unhappy” to be seen as endorsing the statement, parliament has been told.

Liberal senator and indigenous woman, Kerrynne Liddle, told the upper house on Friday she had heard from signatories of the statement that they were uncomfortable with their signatures being “interpreted as consent” for a voice.

“I’ve heard from women surprised to see their signatures on the Statement, unhappy that their attendance and consultation is likely to be interpreted as consent – but who are not prepared to publicly come forward,” she said.

And in a trip to Uluru last week, Senator Liddle was told by numerous Central Australian indigenous leaders that the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the Voice to parliament that it called for were causing nothing but “trouble”.

Murray George, an elder who attended the referendum dialogues in 2017 ahead of the Statement from the Heart being signed, said he was unhappy with the sacred site of Uluru being used politically.

“I was listening that day … that statement from Uluru … that canvas has no meaning,” Mr George told Senator Liddle, in a video seen by The Weekend Australian.

“We’ve got to break that canvas, it’s a trouble maker.”

Trevor Adamson, another Central Australian elder and musician, said there was “in no way agreement” at the dialogues that the Statement from the Heart should “go ahead”.

Senator Liddle said the Prime Minister needed to “reflect very carefully on the concerns raised by the senior Aboriginal law men”.

“There has been nowhere near enough consultation and such little detail about how it will work,” she said.

While the Uluru Statement from the Heart received endorsement and signatures from hundreds of delegates, the dialogues held ahead of its ratification in 2017 were not without controversy.

Seven delegates, including former Greens senator Lidia Thorpe, walked out of the Uluru convention because of concerns over a loss of sovereignty and no guarantee of a treaty process.

Senator Liddle said the four men she spoke to at Uluru last week were among many who felt “deceived, disrespected and ignored”.

“They are gutted that their most sacred place continues to be used for political and promotional purpose. They don’t see their hopes and dreams delivered by Voice – but they know Australians want and can do better,” she told the Senate.

“Tension about the much-publicised Statement from the Heart has been simmering since its creation – yes since its emergence in 2017.”

Opposition indigenous Australians spokeswoman, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, on Friday also used her speech to the senate to raise concern with the Uluru Statement from The Heart, which she said was signed by “hand picked individuals” that weren’t representative of the wider indigenous population.

“Of those 250 (signatures), I am even told some signatories didn’t know what they were signing!” she said.

Despite recent polling showing a slippage in support for the voice, Anthony Albanese has declared he is “positive” about the referendum, due to take place between October and December this year.

The Australian understands the Yes campaign is gearing up to lobby more strongly across the country after legislation for the referendum on the voice passes in this parliamentary sitting fortnight, with a federal-election style strategy to be put in place from October that is set to include daily press conferences and rallies to garner public attention.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/central-australian-leaders-raise-concern-with-uluru-statement-from-the-heart/news-story/daca75a0e3bd0cc66e44dd45ddb40166

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021683

File: 363e9c44bd06cef⋯.jpg (430.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_the_L….jpg)

File: 6fc35349c1c3c38⋯.jpg (238.41 KB,1620x912,135:76,Referendum_Council_Co_Chai….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992119

Shock of recognition as Yes vote for Indigenous voice to parliament softens

DENNIS SHANAHAN - JUNE 17, 2023

1/3

The Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government is in trouble even before final passage of the referendum legislation next week and the official announcement of a poll date – expected to be in October.

This is not a subjective assessment but an objective judgment based on what the Yes campaign supporters are saying, what they are not saying, what they are doing and what they are not doing.

There are also problems with polling and who the Yes campaign wants to be seen campaigning for the Indigenous voice and leading the public debate.

This is a crucial point not only for the Yes campaign but also for Anthony Albanese and the Labor government, which stands to lose so much if the referendum is lost.

Peter Dutton also is affected by who will be seen to be running the referendum debate on both sides. The Opposition Leader is already the de facto leader of the No campaign, which trails behind the Yes campaign in every capacity except a growing number of opinion polls.

Yet this week, as the Senate confirmed there would be no compromise on the referendum question, pro-voice leaders began to suggest the Yes campaign was running off the tracks, falling victim to the negativity of the No campaign, that there were mixed messages and the Yes side needed to get Canberra and the politicians out of the debate.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney now wants to concentrate on the practical benefits of the voice. Cape York Indigenous leader and Yes23 campaign member Noel Pearson says there is “a lack of clarity that is really working against us”.

Referendum Council co-chairman Mark Leibler says there is too much emphasis on the voice and not enough on recognition. And Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin says there has to be a shift “away from Canberra and into the hands of everyday Australians”.

As well, a GetUp-backed group that supports the Indigenous voice to parliament is urging advocates, organisations and journalists to alienate opponents and encourage them to make racist comments so more Australians join the Yes camp.

As young people and Labor supporters start to drift from soft Yes to hard No, even the Prime Minister has changed his message, dropping his description of the voice as being modest to it being the opposite.

Indeed, prominent Yes campaigner Marcia Langton declared this week that the establishment of a voice would help fix the Constitution by ameliorating racism in the founding document and reportedly said the campaign was intent on tearing up the fabric of the Constitution.

While Pearson has dismissed as “bed-wetting” the call by fellow Indigenous leader Mick Gooda to compromise by dropping the contentious reference to executive government – giving the voice the constitutional power to weigh in on all government decisions from the Reserve Bank to the Great Barrier Reef – it would seem the consistent polls showing not only a decline in support for the voice but, in some cases, a majority on the No side have led to clear concerns about the need for a change in direction.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021687

File: 68b5bea100b8ae2⋯.jpg (79.35 KB,768x1024,3:4,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

File: b503c0017d2f5b9⋯.jpg (528.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,In_the_past_week_Linda_Bur….jpg)

>>19021683

2/3

It is extraordinary that the Yes campaign – which has a war chest of tens of millions of dollars, years of preparation, dozens of national Indigenous leaders, the backing of corporate giants, sporting codes and churches, and, most important, the “all in” backing of Albanese and the federal Labor government – should be conceding it’s in trouble even before the referendum is launched.

It is even more extraordinary that having identified it is losing ground, the apparent answer to get the Yes campaign back on track is to magnify what are clearly the issues that are at the root cause of the loss of public support.

The campaign for a referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government began more than a year ago when Albanese nominated a voice to parliament and the implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart as his first priority on election night.

The public opinion polls put the voice and recognition of Indigenous people into the Constitution in an overwhelming position with goodwill and a determination to help solve generational problems that have eluded Australian governments for more than 120 years.

Since then Albanese has promoted the voice, accepting the recommendations of the referendum working group that ensured the double-barrelled question would include Indigenous recognition in the Constitution and an advisory voice to parliament and executive government that would be enshrined in the Constitution with an entirely new chapter.

Wary of a republican-style referendum defeat because of a detailed question about process, Albanese decided to deny details, to eschew bipartisan support and to leave the format of the voice to be legislated after the referendum.

As the most prominent figure on the Yes side, Albanese, as Prime Minister and a politician from Canberra, was an energetic and forceful advocate for the voice to parliament and recognition within the Constitution.

But what has become clear in recent weeks is that the voice is on the nose while recognition gets sympathy and approval from the public. So, the first thing that is happening is that the Yes campaign is avoiding the use of the word voice wherever possible and promoting recognition.

People have been demanding detail about how the voice would work, how it would affect day-to-day government. The defiant refusal to provide detail of how it would work has figured prominently among voters’ concerns, with the latest Newspoll showing a big drift away from supporting the referendum and into the “don’t know” category. It plays into the No campaign’s motto: “If you don’t know vote No.”

Rather than attempt to provide more information about how the voice would work and allay fears, the Yes campaign has decided simply to stop referring to the voice.

A breezy statement from the Yes23 campaign this week encouraged grassroots participation at picnics and sports but did not mention the voice once.

Pearson said this week the Yes campaign must do more to make it clear that recognising Indigenous people in the Constitution was the aim and the voice was the means to do it.

Leibler told The Australian: “Noel is correctly making the point that the emphasis needs to be on recognition. The reason why the wrong emphasis is being put on it is because I think the Yes case has been, to some extent, cornered by some of the disinformation … it is a pitfall that needs to be avoided.

“If there is disinformation then it needs to be rebutted, but I think what the campaign needs to do is less of the rebuttal and more of the positive message.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021689

File: 61d3102b36b5320⋯.jpg (340.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_holds_a_p….jpg)

File: fc89a0417b29646⋯.jpg (165.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Indigenous_voice_to_pa….jpg)

>>19021687

3/3

When the voice entered the debate, the first Newspoll showed the biggest reason for people to say they would vote No was that they did not think the voice would address the practical problems facing the worst-off Indigenous communities.

In the past week Burney shifted to mentioning the practical benefits of having a voice to parliament and even suggested it could help change how work for the dole was applied or build more housing in remote communities.

But the problem here for the Yes campaign is that to argue about how much can be done practically is to reinforce the breadth of the voice and to promote it as a silver bullet solution to all the problems of Indigenous Australians.

Previous comments from Pearson and fellow referendum working group member Megan Davis have reinforced these powers of the voice over day-to-day government with declarations everything had to be subject to the voice representatives and the voice could not be “shut up”. Again, such sentiments play into the No campaign argument that there will be another layer of bureaucracy with reach into every aspect of decision-making at every level of federal government.

Finally, the Yes campaign’s wish to get politicians out of the debate is to try to make the debate less partisan, less polarised, and to have it fit the self-description of having come from the bottom up.

The difficulty with this strategy is that many of the recent problems for the Yes campaign were not created by political leaders supporting the voice – such as Albanese – but from non-political Indigenous leaders who overreached and turned people off with suggestions of racism in voting No.

Certainly Albanese’s description of No voters as being “Chicken Littles” didn’t help a positive image, but much worse and more divisive language has been used outside Canberra. Again, though, the Yes campaign is reacting to the low-cost but effective No argument that the referendum is for a “Canberra voice” imposed by the elite and politicians, not as is claimed from the ground up.

There’s still plenty of time and money for the Yes campaign to build momentum towards October, but so many different and conflicting messages – with just a hint of damp sheets – are not a good sign when the polls are running against it.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/shock-of-recognition-as-yes-vote-for-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-softens/news-story/dba6e38a90e15946477b3c30aa021d87

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021740

File: 228014a23928ee7⋯.jpg (382.43 KB,750x755,150:151,KR_22.jpg)

File: fdf83ac82a254b9⋯.jpg (320.32 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,FygUSwragAAMdGt.jpg)

File: 6a8824049f754ae⋯.jpg (322.45 KB,2047x944,2047:944,FygUSwoaAAMm69L.jpg)

File: de0cc5e07ece7c0⋯.jpg (507.68 KB,1536x1886,768:943,FygUSwtagAAMkWN.jpg)

>>18934236

>>18977940

Kevin Rudd AC Tweet

Great to spend time with Pacific Ambassadors to the US and US Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy. Important conversations about the future of the region we all call home.

https://twitter.com/AmboRudd/status/1668605986771460104

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021747

File: d8ce9ff3290ecf4⋯.jpg (195.63 KB,750x637,750:637,KR_23.jpg)

File: 5cd7bb0c84431e5⋯.mp4 (2.95 MB,848x480,53:30,pUuOEBOyuD_PZr_n.mp4)

>>19021740

Kevin Rudd AC Tweet

https://twitter.com/AmboRudd/status/1668439552036425729

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021795

File: 5ec8def3c00ade6⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,3000x2000,3:2,US_pollster_Frank_Luntz_sp….jpg)

File: eb41a5beb4db2e2⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,3707x2471,3707:2471,Donald_Trump_still_has_a_g….jpg)

‘I was wrong’: Trump grows stronger, can beat Biden and topple US democracy, pollster fears

Latika Bourke - June 13, 2023

1/2

London: Leading US pollster Frank Luntz says Donald Trump can re-win the presidency and that if that happens, US democracy could collapse.

Speaking to this masthead in London, where he was a guest speaker at the Centre for Policy Studies’ Margaret Thatcher conference, Luntz said he was wrong to declare in 2021 that Trump would never again be president.

“I now have to acknowledge that it is a distinct possibility that Donald Trump could be elected president – I did not believe that one year ago,” he said.

“I did not believe that the search of Mar-a-Lago would be handled so badly, I did not believe that the indictment of him in New York would be handled so badly.

“I did not believe that his opponents would be so inept as to actually strengthen him and the combination of all of those makes him now viable, not just in the Republican primary but in the general election.”

Luntz said US democracy could collapse if Trump was reinstated by the American people.

“It’s now conceivable that in 2024 the country comes apart,” he said. “We have a 15 per cent likelihood of that destroying American democracy depending on what happens.”

“NATO is in jeopardy, clearly. Ukraine will no longer receive American support. Our legal system will be in jeopardy – I don’t want to contemplate it.”

He denied he was exaggerating and said comparisons to the United States surviving civil war were irrelevant in modern times.

“Everything that I would have [previously] said to you was impossible is actually happening,” Luntz said.

“It was never conceivable before, just as January 6 wasn’t conceivable, just as the election day wasn’t conceivable, just as Roe v Wade being overturned wasn’t conceivable.

“The Roman Empire could never fall until it fell, the sun never set on the British Empire until it came apart, the Greeks created civilisation and now look where Greece is.”

Luntz said the reason US democracy was so frail was because truth was now contested and no longer about agreed-upon facts. That means people consume news to affirm their own views rather than be informed, he said.

“Democracies can survive negativity and they can survive division,” he said. “They cannot survive rejection of the truth because in the end, the foundation of democracy is knowing the truth, that’s how voters vote correctly.

“The moment you stop seeking the truth and start rejecting it, actively, that’s the moment when you lose this wonderful system of government, and we are there right now.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021797

File: af30bb9265141e6⋯.jpg (262.44 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Trump_grows_stronger_can_b….jpg)

>>19021795

2/2

Luntz said Trump was weaponising the various court proceedings against him to fashion himself as being persecuted rather than prosecuted.

“He actually knows the language of victimisation better than any politician I’ve seen anywhere across the globe, and he uses it effectively and has caused people to rally around him.

“So he’s actually stronger today under two indictments, being found guilty of sexual assault, he’s actually politically stronger today than he was one year ago.”

Former US ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, Senator Tim Scott from South Carolina, former vice-president Mike Pence and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum are all hoping to beat Trump for the Republican nomination.

DeSantis is considered the candidate capable of posing the greatest threat to Trump, but Luntz identified Scott as having the best prospects of beating Biden.

“If Tim Scott gets the nomination he’s absolutely beating Joe Biden without any hesitation,” Luntz said.

Americans care about affordability, not the economy

Luntz said Biden was vulnerable and weaker than when he defeated Trump in 2020 because he had embarked on too much government spending that had added to the cost of living.

He said voters were no longer making decisions on issues but on attributes relating to the cost of living.

“They want certainty, predictability and security – against the next COVID virus, against the next economic collapse, against inflation, and by the way it’s not the economy that matters most or even inflation; it’s affordability,” he said.

“And they do not believe that Joe Biden’s succeeding in this area to a great degree.”

He predicted that the British Conservative Party would hemorrhage previously-held Labor seats they won under Boris Johnson in 2016 because voters were loyal to Johnson and not the Conservatives.

Johnson quit parliament on Monday, accusing a parliamentary inquiry investigating the parties held in Number 10 during COVID lockdowns of forcing him out in an anti-democratic witch hunt.

While British voters turned on the former prime minister for putting himself above the people, Luntz said this had not happened to Trump in the US.

“This is something that Trump has clearly done, but they forgive him for it, which is what I don’t understand [and] which is why I’m particularly nervous about the state of politics in America,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/i-was-wrong-trump-grows-stronger-can-beat-biden-and-topple-us-democracy-pollster-fears-20230613-p5dg11.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021837

File: e3b87c941194e54⋯.jpg (2.11 MB,4589x3061,4589:3061,Polls_suggest_80_per_cent_….jpg)

File: d48c71022fbad7a⋯.jpg (1.15 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Prime_Minister_Albanese_is….jpg)

File: 0a7c5cfd16aaf57⋯.jpg (310.26 KB,825x616,75:56,AA_10.jpg)

>>18670549 (pb)

>>18723554 (pb)

>>19021795

Donald Trump could still have a shot at the presidency despite his legal troubles. But is Anthony Albanese prepared?

David Speers - 15 Jun 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese probably didn't think there was much chance of Donald Trump returning to power when he openly criticised the then US president during his final days in the White House.

Albanese, still opposition leader at the time, said Trump had "encouraged" the January 6 insurrection in 2021. He labelled it a direct assault on "the rule of law and democracy".

The Labor leader also suggested Trump's foreign policy approach "saw the first steps in a retreat by the US from its historical role as leader of the post-war international order".

These comments were made from a position of relative diplomatic safety. Trump had already lost to Joe Biden, who would be sworn into office within days. There was little risk in joining the chorus of criticism being levelled at such an outrageous president on his way out the door. Surely the man in the red MAGA cap was done.

And yet, more than two years later, now Prime Minister Albanese is being urged to prepare for the very real possibility of a Trump return.

Trump 2.0?

Bruce Wolpe has worked as an adviser to Democrats in Congress for years and served on the staff of former prime minister Julia Gillard in Australia. His new book, Trump's Australia, looks at how Trumpism changed Australia and the consequences of a second Trump term.

Put simply, Wolpe is no Trump fan, but he is taking very seriously the prospect of a comeback. He thinks the Albanese government should, too.

"His chances of [Republican Party] nomination are over 50 per cent", says Wolpe. "His chances of election are just under 50 per cent, depending on the economy."

That's a stronger chance of a second Trump presidency than many in Australia have been willing to contemplate.

Barring a foreign policy crisis, US elections are generally determined by the performance of the economy. If prices are falling and jobs are growing, President Joe Biden is well placed to win a second term. If there's no recovery, Biden will struggle.

Or as Wolpe puts it: "If there's anxiety throughout the country and fear becomes the dominant force over hope, that's Trump territory."

But surely the prospect of Trump facing multiple criminal charges and the prospect of serious jail time knocks him out of contention? Not exactly.

Will Albanese call Trump out?

Yesterday, Trump demonstrated how he planned to use his legal troubles for political gain, regardless of the cost to democratic institutions.

After pleading not guilty to 37 charges, including alleged breaches of the Espionage Act for stashing classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, the former president did what he does best.

He used the whole circus to his advantage, hosting a fundraiser where he made various misleading statements, called the US Justice Department "corrupt", and suggested the FBI had "staged" photos of the classified documents.

It was all, he said, an orchestrated attempt at "election interference" by Joe Biden, who was out to "destroy democracy".

This, by the way, from someone facing a separate criminal probe himself over alleged election interference for asking officials in Georgia to alter the results of the state's 2020 presidential vote.

Polls show 80 per cent of Republican voters think Trump should still be eligible to be president, even if convicted. Most of his Republican rivals, wary of upsetting the base, are doing nothing to discourage Trump's conspiracy line.

So, will Albanese call this out, as he did after the January 6 insurrection, as a direct assault on "the rule of law and democracy"? He hasn't so far.

Whenever asked about the prospects of a Trump return, the prime minister treads carefully. He prefers to focus on the "common values" the US and Australia share, which are "bigger than any individuals". He's confident the AUKUS deal will survive, regardless of who wins next year's presidential election.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021844

File: edab0e31bd5000d⋯.jpg (697.7 KB,1781x2375,1781:2375,Bruce_Wolpe_s_new_book_loo….jpg)

File: d77fd9e5505dba1⋯.jpg (1.62 MB,5000x3335,1000:667,Donald_Trump_speaking_to_s….jpg)

File: 0e8907e5e59e617⋯.jpg (487.21 KB,825x941,825:941,KR_15.jpg)

>>19021837

2/2

Better to be proactive than reactive

Bruce Wolpe isn't so sure.

"He always wants stuff for the US," says Wolpe, who doubts Trump's commitment to both AUKUS and the Quad, given the approach he took in office to "bring down" NATO.

And now that Boris Johnson and Scott Morrison are no longer there, Wolpe isn't sure old alliances will mean much. "Trump likes Australia, but will he like Australia under Albanese?"

The biggest unknown is what Trump might do about China. "God only knows," Wolpe says. "Does he want a deal with China on trade at the expense of Taiwan? We don't know. He hasn't been definitive. We have to be prepared."

If Trump's views on Ukraine are any guide, Taiwan has good reason to be nervous. He's suggested he could have cut a deal with Putin not to invade by handing over Ukrainian territory to Russia. "I could've made a deal to take over something, there are certain areas that are Russian-speaking areas, frankly."

Wolpe's concerns are existential. If Trump returns, he argues American democracy as we have known it "will probably come to an end". Australia would therefore need to question its commitment to the alliance.

Preparing for even the possibility of such an unpredictable figure returning is a difficult task for all US allies. Many, no doubt, would prefer to write off his chances, particularly given the various legal dramas now in train.

But, as Wolpe says, it's better to be proactive than reactive.

That means forging even closer ties with like-minded regional powers, including India, Japan and South Korea.

It also means continuing to make the case for Australia's interests in Washington among both Democrats and Republicans. Much of that task will fall to the newish Australian ambassador, Kevin Rudd.

One added complication: Over the years Rudd has gone much harder on Trump than most, calling him "the most destructive president in history", and a "traitor to the West".

He'll need all his diplomatic skills to re-position should Trump remain competitive in the presidential race now underway.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-15/donald-trump-presidency-despite-legal-anthony-albanese-australia/102479922

https://twitter.com/AlboMP/status/1346929529198055424

https://twitter.com/MrKRudd/status/1497863031497564161

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19021887

File: 7a0b9daf6a829ba⋯.jpg (64.92 KB,740x400,37:20,FORMER_US_PRESIDENT_DONALD….jpg)

>>18955343

‘Good morning #Australia’: Trump’s social network Truth Social comes Down Under

The social media platform's CEO welcomed Australians by truthing — the website's verb for posting — in response to an Australian QAnon believer.

CAM WILSON - JUN 13, 2023

Australians can now join the Donald Trump-founded social media platform Truth Social after geoblocking that prevented citizens from most countries from accessing the website was removed.

Last week, former congressman and CEO of Truth Social Devin Nunes announced that the Twitter clone was available to users all over the world. Last Monday he “truthed” — the platform’s verb for posted — a message specifically welcoming Australians.

“Good morning #Australia Glad to have you here @truthsocial,” he said, replying to a truth from an Australian user whose profile bio contained QAnon hashtags.

Truth Social is one of myriad “alt tech” websites created during the Trump presidency and its immediate aftermath as mainstream tech companies increased their moderation efforts, cracking down on hate speech and misinformation.

These platforms targeted users with the promise of “open and honest conversations without discriminating on the basis of political ideology”, a nod to a long-running, substance-less grievance that big tech companies are biased against conservative users.

What separates Truth Social from platforms such as Gab, Parler and GETTR is the involvement of the former US president. The platform is run by the Trump Media & Technology group and it became Trump’s social media home after he was suspended from platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. Until recently, it was only accessible in the US, Canada, Germany and Brazil.

As Truth Social’s most-followed user, Trump picks up where he left off from Twitter with stream-of-consciousness truths that opine on political issues, complain about his legal troubles (including breaking news of an indictment for charges that he will face court for in Miami hours from now), attack his opponents and spread lies to his 5.4 million users.

“The DeSanctimonious Polls are crashing because of his stance on Obliterating Social Security and Medicare. Nothing he will ever do is going to change his votes. Attracting small crowds that leave early, never a good sign!” Trump posted late last night Australian time.

A week in, few prominent Australians appear to have joined. The biggest names so far include former MP turned blogger and conservative activist George Christensen and freedom movement citizen journalist Real Rukshan. A search for usernames featuring “Aussie” or “Australian” reveals dozens of small accounts, many of which include references to QAnon and other conspiracies.

This seeming lack of interest from Australians reflects a broader malaise for the platform. Financial documents revealed that Truth Social had just 5 million users after a year of use, with downloads of the app plummeting after a hot launch. Meanwhile, Twitter has shifted to the right under Elon Musk, negating much of the appeal of Truth Social.

Despite this, Trump remains loyal to Truth Social — for now. In November, Musk restored Trump’s Twitter account and invited the former host of The Apprentice back but to no avail. Shortly after the decision, Trump posted to Truth Social that he would remain on his platform: “Don’t worry, we aren’t going anywhere. Truth Social is special!”

Cam Wilson is Crikey’s associate editor. He previously worked as a reporter at the ABC, BuzzFeed, Business Insider and Gizmodo. He primarily covers internet culture and tech in Australia.

https://www.crikey.com.au/2023/06/13/truth-social-donald-trump-australia/

https://truthsocial.com/@DevinNunes/posts/110489377745317451

https://truthsocial.com/@karina_samperi/posts/110488831449797937

https://truthsocial.com/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19026316

File: e59cd0ae5ff6b81⋯.jpg (463.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Israeli_flag_flutters_….jpg)

File: 8703690148c60e4⋯.jpg (103.86 KB,768x1024,3:4,Premier_Daniel_Andrews_des….jpg)

File: 3fbf003bc74d7c8⋯.jpg (118.74 KB,768x1024,3:4,Bob_Carr_described_Israel_….jpg)

Albanese government must recognise Palestine this term: Victorian Labor Conference

SARAH ISON and RACHEL BAXENDALE - JUNE 18, 2023

The Victorian Labor conference has called on the Albanese government to recognise Palestine before the next election, setting the stage for the matter to become a focal point at the upcoming national conference in August.

A motion put to the Victorian Labor conference today congratulated Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong for the restoration of aid to Palestinians and shifting Australia’s vote at the United Nations on matters relating to Israel’s occupation of Palestine.

But the state conference called on the federal government to go further and formally recognise Palestine in this term.

“The state conference calls on the Albanese Labor government to recognise the Palestinian state within the term of this parliament, joining with 138 countries and the Vatican, which have already done so,” the motion, seen by The Australian, said.

The motion was carried by the voices, rather than being put to a formal vote in order to avoid public disagreement on the contentious issue.

Sources told The Australian while the issue of recognising Palestine was not overly contentious, there was some disagreement from the Right faction over the inclusion of a time-frame in the motion.

However, due to the Socialist Left overwhelmingly having the numbers in the Victorian branch, the motion was passed on the voices without any call for an official count.

The vote comes just weeks after Premier Daniel Andrews described Israel as arguably “the only true democracy in the region” at Victorian Parliament’s celebration of the 75th anniversary of Israeli Independence, held at the Windsor Hotel on May 30.

“I know it‘s always been important to the Jewish community that issues of Israel’s sovereignty, Israel’s right to exist within safe, well-defined, and secure borders, Israel, as I said a beacon of democratic freedom, the only true democracy in the region, one might argue, all of those things, it’s always been important to the community that that’s been beyond the mainstream political contest,” Mr Andrews said.

“To the extent that I’ve been able to make a contribution towards that bipartisan clarity, I’m proud to have done that, and I understand how important that is.”

Former foreign affairs Minister Bob Carr said the motion “was not a surprise”.

“Israel has got the most right wing government in its history. Persisting with a strikingly cruel occupation of Palestinian land,” he said.

“It’s very important all supporters of two state solution send the message to both sides and the best way for us to help make that happen is to join 138 nations which already recognise Palestine.”

The Zionist Federation of Australia expressed its “deep disappointment” in the Victorian Labor state conference’s resolution on Palestine.

“It is a truism that if you reward bad behaviour, you’ll get more of it. From its support for terrorism, its rejection of negotiations and its promotion of vicious antisemitism, the Palestinian leadership actively undermines peace,” ZFA President Jeremy Leibler said.

“By calling on the federal government to reward this behaviour with diplomatic recognition, the Victorian Labor resolution implicitly celebrates this.”

Labor’s National Conference in August is expected to see hot debate on issues of Palestinian recognition and Aukus, with the left predicted to have the numbers on the floor for the first time in decades.

Pro-Israel lobby groups are expected to call on the upcoming ALP ­national conference to reverse language supporting recognition of Palestine as a state, as reported by The Australian earlier this month.

Previous national confer­ences have passed motions that call on Labor to recognise Palestine as a state when it was “next in government”, with the 2019 platform noting such a change should be “an important priority”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-government-must-recognise-palestine-this-term-victorian-labor-conference/news-story/0beec40611c2b99abac4359f370265cd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19026358

File: ea92a632709ba56⋯.jpg (941.77 KB,4000x2662,2000:1331,Win_or_lose_the_Voice_refe….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992177

Crunch week for Albanese with no turning back on Voice referendum

David Crowe - June 18, 2023

1/2

The campaign for the Indigenous Voice has reached a point of no return after five years of stubborn argument for the peak body to be enshrined in the constitution.

The power and membership of this new group will remain the subject of fierce debate, but the change to the Constitution will be set in cement once the Senate decides on the bill to hold a referendum later this year. The vote is expected from 10am on Monday.

The Senate will set the clock ticking on a popular vote to be held within two to six months of the passage of the bill, which means the only way to rethink the wording of the constitutional amendment is to cancel this plan and draft a new bill.

That scenario seems impossible now the two key leaders, Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton, have marshalled their forces on either side of the question. The prime minister says the Yes case will triumph, although history says the opposition leader has the easier task. He only has to block it in order to win.

Public polling suggests the Yes side is on track for defeat. The Resolve Political Monitor, published by this masthead last week, shows support for the change has fallen from 58 per cent in April to 53 per cent in May and then 49 per cent this month on the Yes or No question about the change. Other polls suggest a similar trend, although Yes23 leaders say their polling shows they are in front.

The Resolve Political Monitor has asked 1600 voters the same questions each month over the past three months. The respondents are given the full wording of the government’s proposed change to the constitution and are asked the actual question to be printed on the ballot papers at the referendum.

There is no turning back for Albanese and the Yes campaigners. It is all or nothing because Indigenous leaders decided against the easier path to victory.

Crucially, they sought recognition of First Australians in the Constitution but chose not to settle for this alone. They sought practical recognition through the creation of the Voice as an institution that would take its authority from the Constitution. Parliament could define the powers of this new group but would have no choice on whether it existed.

Why do people vote Yes? “It’s their land,” says one respondent in a written answer from the latest Resolve Political Monitor. “They should absolutely have input into how this country works.” Another says: “They’ve been told what’s best for them for far too long. They should be listened to.” A third says: “It’s time we gave Aboriginal people an equal role in Australian society.”

The No case, however, is energised against the Voice. “All Australians have a way of contacting the government. One section should not get extra access,” says one respondent. Another says: “Albanese has been very sly and untrustworthy and will not say what is in it.” A third says: “They will take more land away from us, and get compensation. It breeds resentment.” These are samples from the various views in the latest survey.

A common theme among those who vote No is that the country should not be divided by race, although this overlooks Section 51 (xxvi) of the Constitution, which already gives the Commonwealth the power to make special laws for people of any race. The fact that white settlers took land from Indigenous people is also overlooked by some respondents.

The central point is that the objections to this change are formidable. A slick advertising campaign, if it arrives, may not be enough to break down this resistance. While is it true that misinformation will cloud the debate, and it is equally true that politicians and the media should avoid fuelling the falsehoods, there is something deeper at work. Many Australians simply do not want a change of this scale.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19026361

File: 009ca50d1755e96⋯.jpg (352.72 KB,1070x1038,535:519,The_RPM_poll_Constitution_….jpg)

>>19026358

2/2

A different proposition might gain more support. The Resolve Political Monitor asked voters whether they would support a “simplified” proposal that removed the more contentious parts of the Voice from being permanently enshrined. This had support from 15 per cent of No voters, although the question was not specific about the alternative model. We may never know if a “softer” reform could win the referendum.

So this is not about the marketing – it is about the product. The Voice is about more than recognition because Indigenous leaders wanted practical change. The terrible suffering of First Australians over 235 years gave those leaders good cause to demand a right to consult on federal decisions, even at the risk of a tragic setback for reconciliation if the referendum fails.

Practical change is ultimately about power, and the polls suggest many Australians do not want to give Indigenous people more power. It is too soon to be sure.

A defeated referendum will be Dutton’s bequest to the nation. He has galvanised the No side and made himself their chief advocate. He has prevented the fracture among the Liberals turning into a rupture. He will emerge as a conservative champion if the No side prevails.

Win or lose, Albanese owns the outcome. He decided the strategy after coming to power in May last year, he issued the draft wording in July and he locked in the proposal with Indigenous leaders in March. Most importantly, he stuck to his proposal when bipartisanship crumbled. He presented parliament with a fait accompli and stared down the calls for a softer reform.

Albanese has left himself room to move on most policies, but not this one. The Voice is now a “crash through or crash” issue for the prime minister. There is no turning back.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/crunch-week-for-albanese-with-no-turning-back-on-voice-referendum-20230618-p5dhfa.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031491

File: acc85c1cae95655⋯.mp4 (12 MB,640x360,16:9,_Moment_of_national_unity_….mp4)

>>18928670

>>18992177

Senate passes referendum plan, cementing Voice to Parliament vote before end of the year

Brett Worthington and Kamin Gock - 19 June 2023

1/2

Australians will vote in their first referendum in more than two decades, with the Senate passing legislation to hold a vote on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament later this year.

The Senate vote ends months of parliamentary procedures and now requires Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to set a referendum date, which must happen no sooner than two months and no later than six months.

The proposed Voice to Parliament would be an independent advisory body that can advise the parliament and government about matters that affect the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.

Mr Albanese is expected to announce a referendum for October, which will be the first since 1999 when Australians rejected the establishment of a republic.

The Senate chamber erupted in applause as president Sue Lines announced the result — 52 votes in support, 19 votes against.

An Indigenous Voice to Parliament was proposed in the Uluru Statement from the Heart in 2017 after hundreds of Indigenous elders and community leaders were consulted across the country.

Ahead of the vote, there was passionate debate in the chamber.

Independent senator Lidia Thorpe, a DjabWurrung Gunnai Gunditjmara woman, dubbed it "happy assimilation day", insisting the Voice would be little more than "appeasing white guilt".

Senator Thorpe last month told the ABC she was considering abstaining from the vote but ultimately told the chamber she could not support something that gave Indigenous Australians "no power".

Labor frontbencher Malarndirri McCarthy, a Yanyuwa woman, said the debate had been carried out in a dignified matter and despite different views and deep passion the "majority of First Nations People want this to happen".

"And that has been the very simple request by all of those First Nations people, who came together through all the dialogues and came together through Anangu country six years ago,” she said.

The senators voting against the legislation were from the Nationals, One Nation, crossbenchers Lidia Thorpe and Ralph Babet and nine Liberals.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031497

File: e2e543efea633d5⋯.jpg (2.04 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_Senate_voted_52_to_19_….jpg)

File: 258caf8292a1abc⋯.jpg (1.84 MB,5000x3332,1250:833,The_Senate_chamber_erupted….jpg)

File: 6ee2ee073c9980b⋯.jpg (2.27 MB,4623x3082,3:2,Lidia_Thorpe_dubbed_the_Vo….jpg)

File: 91b4f46560344fd⋯.jpg (1.95 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Penny_Wong_speaks_with_Lin….jpg)

File: dd2d60c23a8eb0b⋯.jpg (1.74 MB,5000x3332,1250:833,Malarndirri_McCarthy_said_….jpg)

>>19031491

2/2

"I say to my fellow Australians, parliaments pass laws but it is people that make history," Mr Albanese said after the vote.

"This is your time, your chance, your opportunity to be part of making history.

"It will be a moment of national unity, a chance to make our nation even greater."

While the majority of the Coalition voted in favour of the bill, deputy Liberal Senate leader Michaelia Cash said it was not because they agreed with establishing a Voice to Parliament.

She said if the referendum was successful it "would destroy one of our most fundamental values — equality of citizenship".

"The majority of us will vote to pass this bill because we believe in the people of this nation and their right to have a say on this issue," she said.

The opposition has cited concerns with the proposed constitutional change, arguing it is legally fraught and will lead to regular challenges in the High Court, impeding the government.

Senator Watt defended the proposed amendment pointing to the solicitor-general and various former High Court justices, who have advised the government the wording is "constitutionally sound".

Liberal MP Julian Leeser, who quit the frontbench to campaign in support of the referendum, said it was a historic day.

He said supporting the Yes campaign was a practical way that could help close the gap in life outcomes for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

Senator McCarthy urged everyone to be respectful and factual when campaigning in the coming months.

"I am mindful when we reflect on the Marriage Equality debate and the hurt, the deep hurt, that impacted a lot of those families throughout that whole debate," she told the Senate.

"All of us on the Yes side, I urge you to be mindful of the commentary and the conversations that we have with the broader Australian public. All those on the No side, I ask you to do the same.

"It is time now to put this question to the Australian people."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-19/senate-voice-vote-referendum/102495138

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031542

File: ac994b365261d36⋯.jpg (2.75 MB,5243x3495,5243:3495,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: addd43bd332bc05⋯.jpg (866.54 KB,1026x1692,57:94,What_they_said_Indigenous_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

‘Right balance’: PM defends Voice model as referendum bill clears the parliament

Lisa Visentin and Paul Sakkal - June 19, 2023

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the power of the proposed Voice to parliament strikes the right balance and has vowed to campaign for a Yes vote after the bill to authorise the historic referendum passed the Senate on Monday morning, 52 votes to 19.

The bill cleared the parliament after many hours of debate in both chambers, including an extended sitting of the Senate until 4am on Saturday, paving the way for the Yes and No camps to ramp up their campaigns within local communities.

At a press conference where he was joined by leading Indigenous Voice advocates, Albanese defended the proposed constitutional change as the correct model, rejecting the conflicting attacks on the Voice from progressive and conservative circles.

“Some people say this goes too far, some say it doesn’t go far enough. I say we’ve got the balance right,” Albanese said.

“It is just that – an advisory body – but Voice is a powerful word. Because it will give First Nations people a voice and it’s up to us to listen to that voice. The truth is that for most people watching this, it will have no direct impact on their lives but it just might make lives better for the most disadvantaged group in Australia today.”

The bill’s passage through the Senate bookends an emotive debate in the parliament, which included controversial remarks by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, claiming the Voice would “re-racialise” the country and make Indigenous Australians “more equal” than non-Indigenous Australians.

Dutton led the Coalition’s question time attack on the Voice on Monday, saying Australians were being asked to make the “biggest change to Australia’s constitution in decades, creating a permanent new body without any details as to how it would operate”.

Pressed by deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley to explain which areas of public policy would not be captured by the Voice’s scope, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said the body would concern itself “with issues that directly affect First Nations people” and accused the opposition of raising “red herrings” to confuse the public.

Berowra MP Julian Leeser, a member of the Liberals For Yes group, downplayed concerns that the party’s opposition to the Voice would undermine the group’s attempts to win over Liberal voters, as he outlined plans to campaign in neighbourhoods, including doorknocking, town hall-style meetings and street stalls.

“There are Liberals right across the country who are supporting this,” Leeser said, mentioning supporters like former NSW premiers Mike Baird, Dominic Perrottet, and Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff.

While the government and Voice advocates were eager to draw a line under the fractious political debate, the Yes campaign launches into a new phase trying to regain momentum after a number of recent polls showed support for the Voice slipping and the No vote gaining ground.

Asked whether their confidence in a successful vote was misplaced, Indigenous elder and leading Voice campaigner Pat Anderson made an emotional appeal to Australians, describing a Yes vote as “not a big ask”.

“Yes, it has to have some power … and you will give us the power when you vote Yes. We [will] have the mandate of the Australian people and then we can talk as equals – more equal – with the parliament and the executive of the day,” Anderson said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031547

File: 0590b7122006c58⋯.jpg (4.49 MB,5220x3480,3:2,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_durin….jpg)

>>19031542

2/2

Albanese is yet to announce the date of the referendum, but the bill’s passage triggers a requirement for it to be held within two to six months. October 14 is among the preferred dates being weighed up by the government.

In the Senate on Monday morning, the public gallery was packed with visitors as senators from across the political spectrum gave their final reflections on the debate before the vote, which received a standing ovation when the bill passed.

CLP senator and leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, the opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, denounced the Voice as a “dangerous and costly” proposal and said the government had failed to explain how the body would work.

“We are being divided. We will be further divided throughout this campaign. And if the Yes vote is successful, we will be divided forever,” Price said.

NT Indigenous Labor senator Malarndirri McCarthy said Australians were on the cusp of a critical moment in the nation’s history and urged both Yes and No supporters to “listen to the better sides of yourself” and ensure the public debate over the coming months remained respectful.

“It’s important that we are able to pursue this as a country in dignity with respect for one another,” she said.

Indigenous independent senator Lidia Thorpe, a longtime critic of the Voice who had previously foreshadowed she would abstain from the Senate vote, told the chamber the proposal was about “appeasing the white guilt in this country” as she declared she would vote No.

“[The word] ‘gammin’, as we know, is fake; pretend; a joke. And that’s what I think a powerless Voice is,” the Victorian senator said.

Thorpe wore a T-shirt emblazoned with “gammin” as she spoke, partly covered by a jacket after being instructed to cover it by the Senate president Sue Lines in order to comply with the chamber’s “no-slogan” rule.

“I’ll be voting No to this disastrous idea of giving us no power,” she said, yelling “happy assimilation day” after the bill passed.

Thorpe repeatedly interjected as Indigenous Greens senator Dorinda Cox explained why she was voting Yes, including saying “prove it” when Cox said the bill would not result in Indigenous peoples’ sovereignty being ceded.

“This change to the Constitution does not impact our sovereignty, my sovereignty, and I would not be standing up here in support of this bill if I had any doubt in my mind that it would,” Cox said.

Voice architect Megan Davis, Cobble Cobble woman and UNSW constitutional law professor, said the bill’s passage through the Senate was a “historic moment”.

“This is the recognition we’ve been fighting for and what the vast majority of First Nations People support. The significance of this moment cannot be overstated,” Davis said.

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin said the campaign would now enter a “new phase … where the focus turns to having conversations in the community with everyday Australians about why a successful referendum will help deliver practical outcomes on the ground and move Australia forward”.

Albanese said it would be beneath his office to respond to comments made by One Nation leader Pauline Hanson in the Senate debate on Monday in which she appeared to justify actions taken in stolen generations.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/voice-bill-clears-the-parliament-paving-way-for-referendum-20230619-p5dhl1.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031584

File: d1acb945705db06⋯.mp4 (5.1 MB,640x360,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_This_is_y….mp4)

File: 32c1ec418e72d53⋯.jpg (193.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Pat_Dodson_address….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992177

OPINION: We now face a momentous reckoning. Politicians must not decide the outcome

Patrick Dodson, Labor senator - June 19, 2023

1/2

Parliament on Monday finally passed legislation to enable the Australian people to vote later this year in a referendum to change our Constitution. I now look forward to discussions devoid of the political posturing that has poisoned the process so far, because this referendum belongs to the Australian people, not to politicians.

It was to the people that the convention of First Peoples at Uluru more than six years ago addressed the invitation to walk together for a better future. Those who signed the Uluru Statement wanted the Australian people, not politicians, to decide whether the Voice should be enshrined in the Constitution and not to be just a creature of legislation.

The language of the Uluru Statement from the Heart was reasonable and respectful. It is my earnest hope that those qualities will characterise public discussion and debate over the next few months. Moderation should be the hallmark.

But, if the arguments of those opposed to a Voice follow the style and manner of those arguments we heard during the parliamentary debate on the Constitution Amendment Bill over the past fortnight, we can expect a shower of misinformation and misrepresentation. We had warnings of that scenario through the baiting questions of shadow attorney-general Michaelia Cash as the bill bumped through the committee stages in the Senate last Friday night and Saturday morning.

I hope that social media platforms, especially, will deploy maximum resources to monitor malignant material. Unfortunately, there will be no such sanction over the pamphlet that will outline arguments for and against the referendum question and which the Australian Electoral Commission will post to every voter. Labor reluctantly agreed to the pamphlet in a vain attempt to win Coalition support for the referendum.

The Yes and No camps now have four weeks to produce the cases they want to be included in the pamphlet. About a month after that, the governor-general will issue a writ which will nominate a Saturday when the referendum will be held – within six months from now, but not earlier than 33 days after the issue of the writ. Come voting day, all electors will be required to write Yes or No on their ballot paper.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031586

File: ca04eeea75c657c⋯.jpg (2.87 MB,4435x2957,4435:2957,MPs_including_Assistant_Mi….jpg)

>>19031584

2/2

There are three elements critical to understanding this referendum. Firstly, it is about the belated recognition of Australia’s First Peoples. Secondly, it is about establishing a voice through which First Peoples can make representations to the parliament and the government. Thirdly, the parliament will quite rightly determine the composition, functions, powers and procedures of the Voice. Parliament will have authority over what the Voice can and cannot do.

As a representative, gender-balanced body, the Voice will be much more than a symbol of recognition. Its representations and any parliamentary or government responses (or lack of them) to those representations will be recognition at work; its permanence, guaranteed by the Constitution, will signify an enduring recognition endorsed by the Australian people in a successful referendum.

A Voice is a fundamental request of the Uluru Statement, and an essential element in the new constitutional provision. To shrink from its promotion as part of the referendum would sell First Peoples short. It will be their vehicle through which they want to interact with the parliament and the government, and for which they are seeking the public’s support.

First Peoples have not had a truly national voice since the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) was abolished nearly two decades ago. It suits the opponents of the Voice to vilify ATSIC and wrongly accuse it of corruption, but its strengths were never fully realised, especially its local and regional footing.

The Voice, too, will have local and regional connections, giving local communities a real say in their future, and giving young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, in particular, the opportunity to participate in a new community-led political process.

We need to make sure that all our young people are engaged in the debates and civic education programs that will roll out over the next few months – because, while the polls show young people are most likely to support a Yes vote, they also show that cohort tends to know the least about what is proposed.

A successful referendum offers much hope. A negative result would doubtlessly be celebrated by the No voters, but they will have to live with the legacy bequeathed to our children and generations beyond. First Peoples would remain unrecognised in the Constitution and denied a permanent voice to the parliament and government.

A momentous reckoning lies ahead.

Patrick Dodson is a Labor senator for Western Australia.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/we-now-face-a-momentous-reckoning-politicians-must-not-decide-the-outcome-20230619-p5dhlo.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031593

File: 4c7addd20d6e9a5⋯.jpg (104.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_in_the_Ho….jpg)

File: 732d82e5fc73256⋯.jpg (91.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,Penny_Wong_hugs_Senator_Ma….jpg)

File: 021b341037a8633⋯.jpg (124.29 KB,1280x720,16:9,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_d….jpg)

File: 13f316ecdfe36bd⋯.jpg (164.9 KB,1024x768,4:3,Pauline_Hanson_in_the_Sena….jpg)

File: 7639c780c1d5a35⋯.jpg (112.67 KB,1024x768,4:3,Malarndirri_McCarthy_durin….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18992177

Obstacles to the voice risk becoming ever more entrenched

SIMON BENSON - JUNE 19, 2023

The final legislative hurdle has been passed for the voice referendum to go ahead on a so far unspecified date later this year.

But the obstacles to its success remain and are at risk of only becoming more deeply entrenched.

The public polling to date suggests waning support. If the referendum were to be held this weekend the chances of a Yes vote appear slim.

Presumably the private polling and the government’s own research is showing the same thing.

This question for Anthony Albanese will be at what stage he is forced into a rethink if public support continues to soften.

Albanese says he not for turning. He believes the mood will shift in his favour.

But the political pressure on the prime minister will only intensify unless the yes campaign can begin to make up ground.

Albanese argues that a failed referendum will risk putting back the cause of reconciliation and risk international embarrassment for the country. A catastrophic moment for the nation.

But if failure indeed appears likely, then Albanese will have to consider whether to pull the referendum completely or carve out the voice to parliament and go with constitutional recognition only.

On the question of indigenous recognition in the Constitution alone, a referendum would succeed with an overwhelming majority.

It would give Labor its 1967 moment. And Albanese would be applauded for it.

This is where Peter Dutton is likely to now try and steer the debate – that Albanese has a responsibility to ensure that he doesn’t doom the referendum to failure.

It is a false assumption to make that there will only be political advantage for Labor if the referendum fails.

There is deep political risk for Albanese as well.

Blaming the Coalition for undermining the cause will be a futile pursuit if Albanese is successfully portrayed as having had a clear chance to prevent the catastrophe he warns of, but failed to do so.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/obstacles-to-the-voice-risk-becoming-ever-more-entrenched/news-story/8b3a1c8fa07f4c6229d72e2942b8084c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031608

File: 3d02e6b8482f892⋯.jpg (125.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_as_th….jpg)

File: 6a41d1d15c996ad⋯.jpg (137.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_weari….jpg)

File: 3008f79f06f66bf⋯.jpg (127.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031584

‘Happy assimilation day’: Lidia Thorpe embarks on voice tirade in Senate

ROSIE LEWIS - JUNE 19, 2023

Outspoken independent senator Lidia Thorpe has declared the “tokenistic” Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government is the final nail in the coffin that gives her people no power, while wearing a T-shirt inferring the advisory body was fake.

The Indigenous senator embarked on a tirade against the voice as her upper house colleagues spent nearly an hour delivering their final contributions on the government’s Constitutional Alteration Bill, which will pave the way for the referendum to be held between October and December.

Repeating her previous assertion she was in parliament to infiltrate and “destroy the white supremacy that is represented in this place”, Senator Thorpe labelled the Constitution illegal and wished the chamber a “happy assimilation day”.

“The black sovereign movement is a voice that you never allow at the table. If that is anything to go by then your tokenistic voice, what hope has that got? Who’s going to listen to a token voice? You, just you? Do you want the voice to tell you that you need to stop killing our people?” Senator Thorpe said.

“I hope the voice is going to tell them that they’ve got to stop killing our people. They’ve got to stop the suicides, they’ve got to stop assimilating us into their system. We have the oldest constitution on the planet, First Peoples in this country.

“Why are we begging like paupers again to go into a white, racist colonial Constitution that was set up to deny everything that we are. To destroy our lands and waters, to destroy everything as quickly as they could, to extract as much resource from stolen land, to dispossess us and make a nice life for yourselves.

“There is not one law in this country that has ever, ever, ever been good for us, not one. And now we’re meant to accept a powerless voice. It is truly assimilating our people so we’ll fit nicely as your little Indigenous Australians - it’s what you want us to be, right?”

Senator Thorpe, who quit the Greens over the party’s support for the voice, wore a t-shirt with the slogan “gammin”, which is slang used by Aboriginal Australians meaning “to pretend”, “be inauthentic” or to describe something as pathetic, according to the SBS.

She continually interjected during the debate and when the vote on the legislation - passing 52 to 19 - was read out by Senate President Sue Lines

Senator Lines asked Senator Thorpe to cover up the T-shirt slogan, as slogans are banned in the chamber.

Senator Thorpe referred to her gammin T-shirt, which she said “as we know is fake, pretend, a joke and that’s what I think a powerless voice is to this place”.

Opposition Indigenous Australians senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said if the referendum was successful, Australia would be divided forever.

She asked Australians to look at the route of the government’s proposal for a voice.

“Ask themselves if they truly believe that this is the answer? Will an extra layer of bureaucracy and red tape do anything more to help Indigenous Australians? Will a Canberra body of academic experts do anything more to close the gap … (or) bring us closer together?” Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

She said Anthony Albanese mocked concerns raised about the voice but the reality was he could not guarantee it wouldn’t advise on matters like submarines and parking tickets.

“The Prime Minister wants us to blindly trust him to allow his blank cheque – he cannot guarantee anything,” Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

Assistant Indigenous Australians Minister Malarndirri McCarthy said Indigenous Australians were asking for a very simple request to be recognised in the Constitution by voting for the voice.

Senator McCarthy, an Indigenous woman representing the Northern Territory, said she was a little bit concerned by the tone of the debate and asked both the Yes and No sides to be respectful of each other.

“This is a critical moment in our country’s history, it is the right thing to do,” Senator McCarthy said.

“It is time now to put this question to the Australian people.

“Can I say how incredibly proud I am to be able to stand and speak for the voice and the importance of being able to go to a referendum and say Yes for our country, Yes for a better future, Yes for First Nations people to be able to make decisions in terms of advising the parliament and executive.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/happy-assimilation-day-lidia-thorpe-embarks-on-voice-rant-in-senate/news-story/103bf36a81747234d513145ec6a86357

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031624

File: b14a8079742dc4d⋯.jpg (91.13 KB,1280x720,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_appears_alongs….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031584

Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo’s radical vision

GEOFF CHAMBERS - JUNE 19, 2023

1/2

Prominent Yes campaigner for the Indigenous voice to parliament Thomas Mayo has described former prime minister John Howard as a “bastard” and threatened that politicians would be “punished” if they ignored the voice advisory body.

The militant unionist and outspoken figure on the government’s First Nations referendum working group has also raised the prospect of a voice to parliament being the first step towards “reparations and compensation” for Indigenous Australians.

Videos unearthed by No campaign strategists feature Mr Mayo appearing in online forums run by the Search Foundation – established in 1990 as a “successor ­organisation of the Communist Party of Australia” to preserve the socialist movement.

The Maritime Union of Australia national Indigenous officer also delivered provocative statements in videos filmed at Invasion Day, Black Lives Matters and May Day rallies held between 2021 and 2023.

“Every time, comrades, that we have established a voice as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, the bastards have taken it away from us,” Mr Mayo told a May Day rally in Port Kembla last month.

“And let me tell you a story about how we can relate to that. John Howard, do you remember that bastard? John Howard, do you think he wants normal people, workers, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to have a voice? No, he doesn’t.”

Legislation approving the constitutional amendment, which was unveiled on March 23 by Anthony Albanese and referendum working group members including Mr Mayo, is expected to pass through the parliament on Monday. Mr Albanese has previously described the change as “modest”.

Amid plunging support for the voice referendum in opinion polls and divisions among Yes campaigners over strategy and language, Noel Pearson last week suggested the focus should be on constitutional recognition ahead of the voice advisory body.

Yes23 campaigners, who say their tracking polling and larger samples reflect stronger support for their side, are planning a long game armed with greater resources and funding than the No ­campaign.

Mr Mayo, one of the strongest backers of a voice body, in 2021 told the Search Foundation that the power of the voice was its ability to “punish politicians that ignore our advice” on legislation and funding.

At an Invasion Day rally the same year, the author and former wharfie said “we need the constitutional right to have a united voice … we need the power of the Constitution behind us so we can organise like we’ve never organised before”.

“We are sick of governments telling us no, we are sick of governments not listening to our voice. We are going to use the rule book of the nation to force them,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031634

File: c39b7d4fb5be253⋯.jpg (109.14 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Indigenous_Aust….jpg)

>>19031624

2/2

In another video, Mr Mayo said the voice was a “vital step” in delivering outcomes detailed in the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

“‘Pay the Rent’ for example, how do we do that in a way that is transparent and that actually sees reparations and compensation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people beyond what we say and do at a rally?” he said.

The Northern Territory-based Kaurareg Aboriginal and Kalkalgal, Erubamle Torres Strait ­Islander man in 2020 said truth was “leverage”: “It is a way to further what we need for our people in any negotiations for treaties and for other things like legislation, reform and abolishment of the old colonial institutions.”

In another Search Foundation video, he discusses the need to build “representative structures” not unlike those used by unions and Communists.

Mr Mayo sits on the board of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition, which is leading the Yes23 campaign, alongside co-chairs Danny Gilbert and Rachel Perkins, and directors Michael Chaney, Tony Nutt, Mark Textor, Karen Mundine and Lachlan Harris.

Mr Mayo – co-author of The Voice to Parliament Handbook with veteran journalist Kerry O’Brien – said “unfortunately, some of the policy decisions that have been made in the past, have been harmful and divisive”.

“I don’t believe there is anything wrong with pointing that out,” Mr Mayo told The Australian. “We have seen past policy decisions widen the gap, causing a chasm, rather than healing the wound. I strongly believe that this referendum can bring about positive change.

“As I’ve travelled around the country over the past six years, speaking to all kinds of interest groups, including people from all political persuasions, I have sought to bridge the gap by ­helping them to see it from their perspective. I stand by this referendum being a unifying proposal, it is about peace and love and that is purely my interest for this ­country.”

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who is working closely with right-wing activist group Advance on the No campaign, said Mr Mayo’s “divisive statements were not made in secret, but were said very publicly and proudly”.

“These shocking revelations speak to the aggressive and radical agenda behind the Voice and destroy once and for all the myth that this massive change to our Constitution is ‘a modest request’,” Senator Price said.

“He is very clear that the intention, the goal, the ambition of the Voice and this referendum is to divide Australians.”

Mr Nutt, who sits on the AICR board and was principal adviser to Mr Howard, told The Australian that “Thomas is from the Left of politics and I am from the Right”.

The former federal director of the Liberal Party said: “We could find lots to disagree about including John Howard, who I like and respect. What both Thomas and I do agree on is support for the referendum proposal.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-yes-campaigner-thomas-mayos-radical-vision/news-story/3368b82d2d1d2ba5d08512ea6940a0b9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031657

File: 75cf5178c2a81a4⋯.jpg (446.38 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Chinese_hackers_are_believ….jpg)

Chinese hackers use G7 ruse to target Australian government officials

Max Mason - Jun 19, 2023

1/2

Australia is among four countries whose government officials were targeted by suspected China-based hackers after last month’s Group of Seven meeting in Japan, attempting to install malicious software on their devices and steal information.

Following the meeting between G7 countries and leaders from Ukraine, Australia, Brazil, the Cook Islands, Comoros, India, Indonesia, Republic of Korea and Vietnam, a co-ordinated email campaign began targeting government officials, attempting to lure them into downloading a compromised Word document.

Cybercriminals sent emails pretending to be part of Indonesia’s ministries of Foreign and Economic Affairs to government officials from Australia, France, Singapore and the United Kingdom.

Brian Hussey, vice president of cyber threat response at US-listed SentinelOne, whose team discovered the hacking attempt, said the campaign was clearly well funded with a lot of people putting in time and effort.

He said there were signs the hackers were based in China, but would not go as far to say they were backed by the country’s Communist regime.

“We’ve tracked it back to previous TTP [tactics, techniques, procedures] known to be associated with Chinese groups,” Mr Hussey said.

Analysis of the code shows it was made using a software writer called RoyalRoad, often tied back to China-based, or sometimes Russian, groups.

“But as we really dug into it, the type of exploit used, the name of the files and the forensic artefacts left on the system were very similar, or even identical, to previously identified Chinese-based attacks,” Mr Hussey said.

Attached document

“If there’s a meeting, they’re going to want to know as much as they can before this meeting happens, and they can do that by monitoring the emails or locations … so that basically by the time the meeting happens, they already know everything that’s going to be said, they have all the talking points, and they’re prepared.”

The attached document claimed to be a series of action statements from the Hiroshima G7 meeting in mid-May related to food security, as well as security issues such as the South China Sea, and was 40 pages long.

Hidden within the highly professional document are policy points which China often pushes, including strict adherence to the One China policy and pushback against force being used in the South China Sea.

Mr Hussey, a former US Federal Bureau of Investigation senior digital forensic analyst, leads SentinelOne’s intelligence and threat-hunting business WatchTower. He said that after the email campaign came to their attention, the firm did additional research on the dark web, took samples of malware and reverse engineered them to reach the conclusion it was likely coming from within China.

“If it’s an intel organisation, they’re likely looking for locations of high-level targets, what they’re doing, what their emails are producing intel gathering or, if it’s financially motivated, they’re looking for ransomware or other kind of financial motivations,” he said.

“What leads us to China, it starts with the victimology, so whose being targeted? These government officials.”

The file names and techniques used, as well as the time and money spent creating such an extensive document, would point to this not being a standard cybercriminal group, Mr Hussey said.

Once the Word doc is opened, it installs an Information Stealer, or infostealer, malware designed to steal information, including passwords, keystrokes, network activity and other information to send back to the hackers. The hackers used a 23-year-old corruption issue with Microsoft Office. Once the malicious document is opened it gives the hackers remote access to the compromised system.

A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesman said it “employs a range of robust cybersecurity controls in line with the government’s Essential Eight cybersecurity framework. The department’s cybersecurity capability defends the department’s computer network from attacks, including email phishing campaigns.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031659

File: caac8de07e93c5a⋯.jpg (202.87 KB,1920x647,1920:647,The_hacking_group_s_heavil….jpg)

>>19031657

2/2

Quad a likely target

SentinelOne Australia and New Zealand regional director Jason Duerden said ransomware attacks by cybercriminal gangs had been rife in the past 12 months. His firm has a policy group focusing on ransomware in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, the alliance between Australia, the US, Japan and India.

“We do say nations who are potentially against the Quad, the criminal groups that sit within those countries, are more likely to then attack after certain announcements,” Mr Duerden said.

The Australian Cyber Security Centre, which sits with the Australian Signals Directorate, said it was concerned by the “increased scale and severity of malicious cyber activity by state and non-state actors”.

“The Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre provides technical advice and strategies to mitigate cybersecurity incidents caused by various cyber threats, including those conducted by advanced persistent threats such as state actors,” an ACSC spokesman said.

“The Australian government will continue to deter and respond to malicious actors threatening our national interests, including attributing malicious cyber activity when it is in our interests to do so.”

In April, the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation revealed there was a genuine threat of people in parliament, the public service, defence and the judiciary being compromised by hostile powers.

“They are targeting our security clearance holders, those with access to Australia’s most privileged information, capabilities and secrets,” ASIO said in a submission to a legislative review.

“Since the announcement of AUKUS, there has been a distinct uptick in the online targeting of people working in Australia’s defence industry.”

Last week, Google-owned cybersecurity group Madiant reported what it suspected as China state-backed hackers exploiting a security flaw in Barracuda Networks, a popular email security program, to break into the networks of hundreds of public and private sector organisations across the world.

https://www.afr.com/technology/chinese-hackers-use-g7-ruse-to-target-australian-government-officials-20230615-p5dgqq

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19031721

File: 59bc4ad97485aa1⋯.jpg (475.03 KB,748x1270,374:635,XF_1.jpg)

File: 480dd056699b2e8⋯.jpg (342.93 KB,750x827,750:827,XF_2.jpg)

File: 99baaaf75185250⋯.jpg (391.2 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Fy8TLx_X0AIj3Eh.jpg)

>>18934236

>>18977940

>>19021740

Xie Feng 谢锋 Tweet

Thank you, @AmboRudd, for inviting me and my wife to your beautiful residence. Good discussion.

https://twitter.com/AmbXieFeng/status/1670575096354799617

Xie Feng 谢锋

@AmbXieFeng

12th Chinese Ambassador to the United States

https://twitter.com/AmbXieFeng

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19036915

File: fbfc79a6cbf90d4⋯.jpg (131.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_campaigner_Dean….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Indigenous voice to parliament campaigns prepare to launch across the country

SARAH ISON - JUNE 19, 2023

Major events promoting the Indigenous voice to parliament will be held in every capital city within weeks of the bill needed to set up the referendum passing parliament, while the group known as the Liberals for Yes prepares to meet with high-powered conservatives who can lend their voices to the pro-voice campaign.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney will also visit WA – one of the key states of concern for the yes camp – next month as part of her push to convince Australians to support the referendum expected to be held in the middle of October.

The groundswell of campaign activities follow the Constitution Alteration Bill passing the Senate 52 votes to 19 on Monday after months of discussion on the matter in parliament.

Yes23 campaign director, Dean Parkin, said the passing of the legislation signalled the beginning of the grassroots campaign, which would take the debate on the voice out of parliament and into communities across the country.

“Up until now, the process has been dominated by politicians and lawyers,” he told Sky News.

“You can expect to see much more of the Yes campaign out in the streets starting from July 2. There will be a series of community-based events across the country again, creating those spaces and places for people to come into the debate to learn more about it.”

The national event, titled Come Together for Yes, will coincide with the beginning of Naidoc week and will be staffed by some of the 8000-strong volunteer base cultivated by the Yes camp so far.

Mr Parkin said thousands of people had already RSVP’d to the events, and confirmed a greater advertising blitz would follow after Come Together for Yes.

Greens First Nations senator Dorinda Cox said her party would “be in the hands of the Yes campaign across the country” as it lobbied for a yes vote at the referendum, but made clear it would also keep pursuing action on treaty making and truth telling from the government and seek to lock-in a time frame for the establishment of a Makarrata commission.

The Liberals for Yes campaign, which has the support of the conservative think tank Uphold and Recognise, would gear up its own campaign targeting Liberal voters across the country, with a focus on businesses and influential conservatives.

“The type of thing we will do is we will do a lot of those boardroom conversations and try to reach out to those influential people within the conservative ranks and continue to bring them into the conversation,” Liberals for Yes national convener Sean Gordon told The Australian.

“The big thing now is to give confidence to people who feel their voices have been drowned out in this process. There are lots of conservatives and Liberals and National Party members that feel that … our aim is to provide a platform for them to be able to come out and advocate their support.”

The Liberals for Yes recruited former SA Liberal Party director, Sasha Meldrum, in recent weeks to help design its campaign strategy, which will include targeted messaging for conservative voters and focus on debunking myths of the No campaign.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-campaigns-prepare-to-launch-across-the-country/news-story/fa672fe1d8b13037f570895953d50cb2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19036958

File: b6b47674f86c615⋯.jpg (100.41 KB,1280x720,16:9,Professor_Greg_Craven_vice….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18955207

Liberal party facing AEC complaint from constitutional lawyer Greg Craven

SARAH ISON - JUNE 19, 2023

Conservative constitutional lawyer Greg Craven is considering an Australian Electoral Commission complaint against the Liberal Party for using his quotes as part of its No campaign, when he favours the ­Indigenous voice to parliament.

The former Australian Catholic University vice-chancellor revealed many Liberals had tried to recruit him into the No campaign after he had raised concern over executive government remaining in the constitutional amendment.

“I have had face-to-face meetings with important Liberal figures where they have asked me to explain my position and sought to persuade me to No, and I have made my Yes position absolutely clear,” Professor Craven told The Australian.

But despite throwing his support behind the voice passing at the referendum, Professor Craven’s comments on potential risks posed by the body retaining the power to advise executive government are prominent on the Liberal website.

“The voice can comment on everything from submarines to parking tickets … we will have regular judicial interventions,” his quote reads.

Professor Craven’s comment is featured with those of prominent voice critics who are against the body being enshrined in the Constitution, including Coalition members Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Kerrynne Liddle.

“The quotes themselves are ­accurate. But the whole point of these pieces is to give the idea that I am actually opposed to the voice because of these quotes. (It) is completely untrue and misleading, and the Liberals know it,” he said.

“I have repeatedly written publicly that I totally support and will campaign for the voice.”

He slammed the Liberals’ use of words and pictures of people without their permission and “in a deliberately distorted context”.

“What I want done is one of two things: first, if they want to keep using the material I want it accompanied by a statement that ­Professor Craven supports and campaigns for the voice. That would at least be honest, but show up the material as deceptive and unreliable,” he said. “Alternatively, I want it taken down immediately.”

Professor Craven said intended to contact Peter Dutton on the issue and “insist he undertake to do one of these things”.

“If this does not happen, I will lodge a complaint with the AEC that the material is misleading and should be officially removed,” he said.

Mr Dutton was contacted for comment.

Conservatives have raised their own concerns with the AEC over the Yes campaign, with ­Advance Australia claiming the yes23 video promoting the body was “misleading” because it never mentioned the voice to parliament during the advertisement.

The Liberals announced their position on the voice in April, branding it as the “Canberra voice” or the “Labor voice”.

The website claims the proposal is “legally risky with unknown consequences and it will be permanent”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/liberal-party-facing-aec-complaint-from-constitutional-lawyer-greg-craven/news-story/fbab266aa530458af81d2f7086fd7e41

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19036983

File: d2a4946c7f90fcb⋯.jpg (149.71 KB,1280x720,16:9,Penny_Wong_and_Malarndirri….jpg)

File: b7a4b6445cb92d0⋯.jpg (93.6 KB,1280x720,16:9,Pat_Anderson_alongside_oth….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Now it’s up to the people to decide this referendum on the Indigenous voice to parliament

TROY BRAMSTON - JUNE 20, 2023

1/2

The passage of legislation enabling a referendum on enshrining an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government in the Constitution is a watershed in Australian history and it marks the turning point when the debate about this constitutional change must shift decisively from politicians to the people.

The referendum campaign carries a heavy responsibility for all Australians. It is now up to every citizen to command this debate from the politicians and to discuss and deliberate it with goodwill, to call out the fearmongering and misinformation by those opposing it, and to urge those supporting it to explain how it will deliver practical change.

The voice, to my mind, is an opportunity that must be seized to turn Australia in a new direction, with reconciliation and responsibility, and to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

The voice has only one goal: to improve the health, education, employment and justice outcomes for Indigenous Australians. It is not about establishing an apartheid state, dividing one Australian against another along racial lines, or granting special privileges to one group of Australians and denying those same privileges to everyone else.

These are all deliberate falsehoods designed to propagate resentment, fear and anger, and channelling this into No votes at the referendum.

The reality is, as the Closing the Gap reports make clear, on key measures of social and economic wellbeing, progress has been painfully slow or nothing much has changed in more than a decade. The voice, by providing input from local communities into policies and programs, can make real progress in alleviating disadvantage.

What is proposed is both a modest constitutional change but one with profound consequences. It would provide for the parliament to establish a body made up of people representing Indigenous Australians that may provide advice to the executive government and the parliament on matters relating to Indigenous Australians.

It will have no power to delay any decisions contemplated or taken by a government or the parliament. Neither can the voice veto or amend any decision.

Indeed, while the voice would be empowered to give advice, there would be no obligation by policymakers to follow it.

But the point is that such advice can only improve the policymaking process.

The authority of government and parliament will not be diminished by the voice. This is an important point.

Because just how the voice is constituted – such as its number of members and how they are chosen – is determined by the parliament. So is how the voice would function and the procedures it would follow.

This allows the parliament to redesign the voice should it not be operating as effectively as it could be. It allows the parliament to determine how it should be designed and operated.

Enshrining the voice in the Constitution simply means that there must be a voice that provides advice on matters relating to Indigenous Australians.

It is about giving Indigenous Australians, who were here on this continent long before European conquest and settlement, a voice in the policymaking process as it relates to them. It has long been recognised in Australian law, through the Mabo judgment, that Indigenous Australians have a special connection and right to traditional lands.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19036990

File: 134db73ca1dea6e⋯.jpg (153.71 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

File: b23219d476af1b9⋯.jpg (92.62 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_the_R….jpg)

>>19036983

2/2

The voice would provide a mechanism to change how governments engage with Indigenous people.

Noel Pearson, a principal architect of the voice, told me that if public servants and ministers had consulted with a voice, then it would have stopped the destruction of the ancient Juukan Gorge rock shelters in Western Australia’s Pilbara and it would have kept the Northern Territory alcohol bans in place.

Parliament and government also may seek advice from the voice on such things, rather than wait to be given it.

The voice is about empowering local communities without ceding power to them. The authority and power of governments and the parliament remain supreme and not compromised. The courts could hear cases only about whether advice was received and considered, not the merits of that advice or whether it was adopted.

After decades of debate about reconciliation being symbolic or practical, the voice delivers both.

It establishes a body that has as its purpose practical change to improve the lot of Indigenous Australians. By enshrining it in the Constitution, it provides recognition of the First Australians in the founding document of a nation. Pearson also emphasised that the voice would provide for Indigenous Australians to take responsibility. It will be accountable and its work transparent.

This is often overlooked. It means that those who sit on the voice will be responsible for the advice they give or do not give.

Pearson says the Closing the Gap reports will be a scorecard of both the voice and government.

The adoption of the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) Bill by the Senate on Monday is an important step in reconciling a nation to its past and looking to the future.

In the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart, a product of the First Nations Constitutional Convention, Indigenous Australians asked all of us to walk together on a journey to reconciliation.

Those who argue the voice is backed only by “elites” are misguided. This is a tactic to turn voters against constitutional change by fostering resentment.

The support from sporting codes, the business community, churches and faith groups, trade unions and social welfare organisations, law societies and civic bodies is about leadership that is responsive to their members and supporters.

While referendums can be proposed only by politicians, the people will make the final judgment. That is where this debate now rests: with the citizens.

The eyes of the world are upon us. History is calling on us. It is a test for all Australians. We must not fail.

Troy Bramston is a senior writer and columnist with The Australian. He has interviewed politicians, presidents and prime ministers from multiple countries along with writers, actors, directors, producers and several pop-culture icons. He is an award-winning and best-selling author or editor of 11 books, including Bob Hawke: Demons and Destiny, Paul Keating: The Big-Picture Leader and Robert Menzies: The Art of Politics. He co-authored The Truth of the Palace Letters and The Dismissal with Paul Kelly.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/now-its-up-to-the-people-to-decide-this-referendum-on-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/211978161abeda63c20bd0ccaa1182ad

https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037006

File: 643fb87d70ae90b⋯.jpg (128.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Indigenous_voice_to_pa….jpg)

File: 267b7afc759ddce⋯.jpg (59.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Sean_Gordon.jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

The Indigenous voice to parliament needs a fresh start away from Canberra

SEAN GORDON - JUNE 20, 2023

1/2

After many years of sustained advocacy for constitutional recognition of Indigenous people, the parliament has now passed the Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) Bill that sets out the precise words Australians will vote on at the referendum.

The final vote in the House of Representatives was 121 in favour with 25 opposed, and the final Senate vote was 52 in favour and 19 opposed.

This is a significant milestone on the journey to a more reconciled Australia as the debate now moves away from Canberra and out to the cities and regions, where each of us will get to vote on the proposal later this year.

In 2007, John Howard committed to recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Constitution. A decade later, we expressed the way we would like to be recognised: we asked to be recognised through the creation of a new body that would give voice to our people.

We did not ask for a veto over legislation. We did not ask for a third chamber. We simply asked for a say over the matters that affected us, so governments could make better and more informed decisions and our lives would improve as a result.

Given that the Constitution gives the parliament power to make special laws for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, it is only fair that the Constitution also ensures our people’s voices can be heard before such laws are made. It is now up to the Australian people to examine the parliament’s proposal and hopefully agree to it.

As the co-convener of the Liberals for Yes campaign, I believe there is a place for liberals and conservatives in this final stage of the journey to recognition. By voting Yes, you will be voting to ensure the future is different from the past.

Understanding the past can be difficult to comprehend because every experience is different, so I will speak only of my own. I grew up in a foster home on the old Brewarrina Mission in western NSW, and my life’s work has been dedicated to empowering other Indigenous people to step up and take responsibility, and for governments to loosen the control they have over our lives.

This is the exact philosophy espoused by the Liberal Party. To me, voting Yes for recognition through a voice will be the ultimate expression of empowerment. It will acknowledge the desire for our people to be accountable to ourselves and our communities, and to our fellow Australians who voted Yes and put their faith in us.

If you are undecided or are contemplating voting No, then I put two questions to you.

First, what is the alternative? What is the alternative to recognition through a voice, especially when Indigenous people have been clear about the way we would like to be recognised. What is the alternative to improving people’s lives?

We cannot continue to rely on government ser­vices and a never-ending cycle of stop-start policies and programs, ad hoc or non-existent consultation, and crisis-driven responses. We need structural reform that will allow our voices to be heard, and to be valued in the decision-making processes when policies and laws are developed about us.

Political leaders should not fear this type of shift; they should embrace it as a means to a better end.

Second, what do you fear you will lose by voting Yes? By voting Yes, most Australians will not be affected by this change.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037007

File: d1790c984958a33⋯.jpg (206.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Referendum_Working_Gro….jpg)

File: b635fe0ddfba583⋯.jpg (110.83 KB,1280x720,16:9,Linda_Burney_and_the_Refer….jpg)

>>19037006

2/2

It is important to remember the detailed design of the model has always been intended to remain in the remit of the parliament. As the final wording says, the parliament will have the ability to manage the composition, functions, powers and procedures of this body. The parliament will make clear who is speaking, who is listening, and how those who are speaking and those who are listening come together in a new partnership built on mutual respect.

Australians should look past the political posturing and fearmongering that have been on display in Canberra. Instead, look at the practical impact this change will make for Indigenous people such as those living in Milingimbi in eastern Arnhem Land, where I am writing this piece from.

The community here has been working on improving educational outcomes by developing their own solutions informed by local input and led by local leaders. But without the voice structure in place, who is listening?

It is the communities such as Milingimbi that the voice will most benefit.

In the weeks and months ahead, I will be campaigning for all Australians to vote Yes at the referendum. Because in my experience there is no better alternative than empowerment through a voice, and there is nothing to lose and everything to gain by the parliament being better informed when making decisions.

Voting Yes at the referendum means you are voting for a better future, where we come together with a common purpose: to see every Australian prosper and thrive, including our First Australians.

Sean Gordon is chairman of Uphold and Recognise and a member of the Referendum Working Group.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-needs-a-fresh-start-away-from-canberra/news-story/49b95a6fab20851c6120041dca2b0790

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037011

File: 530470d56ebd791⋯.jpg (86.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_min….jpg)

File: cbe32c34d19e2e3⋯.jpg (114.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

File: 2e6040ab3df7654⋯.jpg (176.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Assistant_Minister_for_Ind….jpg)

File: dcb83a45b6eb082⋯.jpg (84.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Struggling Linda Burney must find her voice or risk damaging the Yes campaign

DENNIS SHANAHAN - JUNE 20, 2023

Linda Burney is a parliamentary and political weak point in the Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament and is going to have to radically improve her sales pitch for the referendum.

As the Minister for Indigenous Australians Burney is the second most important Labor face for the voice to parliament and executive government after Anthony Albanese, and she is struggling in the media and in parliament.

There are three parliamentary sitting days before the winter break and Burney is going to have to improve because her performance can’t be shielded forever.

Even the Prime Minister on Tuesday morning has conceded the sliding public support for the voice to parliament and executive government is because people want information.

When asked about falling support in the polls for the voice, the Prime Minister replied:

“Well I think they want further information, and it’s always easier to get a no vote than it is to get a yes vote in a referendum. History tells us that that is the case”.

Now that the referendum legislation has passed the parliament, Burney has to argue for its success and in doing so faces the vital and most potent question from the No campaign – of what government decisions and policies will the voice to parliament be able to affect.

Burney is being asked to answer: What is the scope of the voice’s power and influence and what areas are deemed not “to directly affect indigenous Australians”?

The response from Burney and the Prime Minister in parliament has been to mock the question and call into doubt the intent and motives of those asking the question.

In parliament on Monday, Burney accused people who were seeking an answer of throwing “red herrings” about the Melbourne Link road, and on the ABC’s 7.30 Report accused them of sowing division, polarising people, fearmongering and going “low”.

The Prime Minister has dismissed the requests as absurd saying the voice won’t be interested in parking tickets or public holidays.

But the demand for this basic detail has already got Burney and Albanese into difficulties in the media and into conflict with Indigenous leaders when they tried to limit the scope of the impact of the voice and in which areas it can seek consultation.

Understandably aware of the past difficulties and future dangers of setting boundaries for the voice, Burney simply avoids the question, talks about the terrible plight of Indigenous communities, argues the voice will have a practical effect and concentrates on past process.

Burney simply will not and cannot answer the key question. But, worse for Labor, is that knowing she cannot answer the question directly, the Minister has not developed an at least credible political response while not answering the question.

Earlier this year, on ABC RN, Burney refused to answer whether the voice would become a member of national cabinet and, after Albanese had dismissed the idea, had to say the voice wouldn’t be a permanent member of national cabinet.

Albanese’s own claims that the voice wouldn’t deal with foreign affairs, the environment or tax were also roundly contradicted by indigenous leaders who argued the point of the voice was its ability to cover everything from the Reserve Bank to the Barrier Reef.

Burney, not Albanese, is becoming the Coalition focus in parliament and will have to improve her performance or further damage the Yes cause before the winter break.

It is simply not good enough for Burney to complain the questions are repetitious, talk about the referendum process which is now complete and read positive statements into Hansard. What’s more, as the point Minister she cannot rely on answers bereft of detail but touching in “tone”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/struggling-linda-burney-must-find-her-voice-or-risk-damaging-the-yes-campaign/news-story/c611b2c100d92fdb85e9dd7b2a1e953e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037035

File: df8d659bc58eedb⋯.jpg (2.45 MB,4902x3268,3:2,Lidia_Thorpe_announces_she….jpg)

File: 26db7f7644d4ff7⋯.jpg (2.02 MB,4811x3208,4811:3208,Michael_Anderson_laid_a_bl….jpg)

File: ff1d95217403e24⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,4215x2809,4215:2809,King_Charles_was_offered_a….jpg)

>>19031584

>>18928670

>>19031608

Lidia Thorpe announces she will be backing No campaign against Indigenous Voice

Dana Morse - 20 June 2023

1/2

Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has announced she will give her full support to the No campaign against an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, and is vying to be part of the group writing the referendum pamphlet.

The Senate yesterday passed a bill to trigger the referendum, which now must be held in no later than six months' time.

As part of the referendum process, an official pamphlet is distributed by the Australian Electoral Commission that outlines the arguments both for and against the proposed change, to be written by nominated politicians for each camp.

Senator Thorpe had previously stated she would not give her outright backing to the No case, but on Tuesday revealed the change in her position was spurred on by a breakdown in negotiations with the federal government over implementing the recommendations from the 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, and the 1997 Bringing them Home report into the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out of home care.

"I was in negotiation with the government, and I thought that they would act in good faith," Senator Thorpe said.

"They are two areas I have been talking about for a very long time. They are three decades old and they have self-determining solutions from the people themselves.

"The government have made up all the excuses as to why they can't do that, so they didn't come good. They could have shown good faith at least to save people's lives here and now and they haven't done that."

The ABC has contacted Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney for comment.

Senator Thorpe said she intends to be part of the committee that will write the No case in the referendum pamphlet, which will be distributed to every household later this year.

"The No pamphlet, absolutely I'll be there. I'm looking forward to it," she said.

"We're going to have to sit in a room with people that we don't normally get along with, so looking forward to that journey."

The federal government is yet to identify who will be on the committee to write the pamphlet for the Yes case.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037039

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19037035

2/2

Black Sovereignty Movement meet at parliament

Senator Thorpe also hosted a meeting of the Black Sovereignty Movement at Parliament House, which was attended by around 15 Aboriginal elders and leaders from across the country.

Warlpiri Elder from Yuendumu in the Northern Territory Ned Hargraves says his community does not understand the Voice.

"I'm here today representing my community, representing because people out in the community really don't know what is 'the Voice'," Mr Hargraves said.

"If I hand you a piece of paper in my language, in Warlpiri, would you ever dare to sign it? No you wouldn't, because you wouldn't know what I am saying, what I am asking."

While the group has made its position on the Voice clear, it hasn't put forward an alternative policy beyond calling for land rights and treaty to be negotiated between First Nations, the Crown and the Commonwealth.

Euahlayi Elder Michael Anderson from New South Wales presented a blanket and a bag of beads as a starting point for negotiations with the Crown.

"The land was taken from us for nothing, but we're not that greedy, so what we're doing is offering a blanket for King Charles and a set of beads to be taken back to England," Mr Anderson said.

"Anthony Albanese, do what you want with it, but that's a gift for the King. We're taking our land back."

Ms Burney, speaking after the Senate passed the legislation, said the majority of First Nations Australians backed the Voice.

She said it would help right historical wrongs.

"This is not about symbolism or tokenism, it's common sense," Ms Burney said.

"For too long, Indigenous Australians have been consistently worse off than non-Indigenous Australians. The Closing the Gap data shows us that. It's a broken system.

"The Voice is our best chance of fixing it because when we listen to people on the ground and consult with locals, they make better decisions and achieve better outcomes."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-20/lidia-thorpe-will-back-no-campaign-against-indigenous-voice-/102500592

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIsVOYCdMwE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037048

File: eab1f6047f474e4⋯.jpg (167.75 KB,1280x720,16:9,Martin_Fisk_outside_Parlia….jpg)

File: 39a6a0f0689b7b7⋯.jpg (137 KB,1280x720,16:9,Emma_Webster_Brittany_Higg….jpg)

File: 0f014a945049781⋯.jpg (145.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Menslink_chief_exec….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Menslink CEO Martin Fisk tipped off Heidi Yates about Brittany Higgins’s rape claim

KRISTIN SHORTEN - JUNE 20, 2023

1/2

A Canberra charity boss who was nominated for a top Australian honour by David Sharaz and whose wife works for the Labor Party can be revealed as the mystery man who told Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates about Brittany Higgins’s rape claim weeks before it became public.

Former Menslink chief executive officer Martin Fisk, whose wife Sandra is the ACT Labor Party’s operations manager, told Ms Yates in January 2021 that he was “working with a young woman who was about to make a sexual-assault disclosure” and that it “would likely attract national media attention”.

Mr Fisk’s involvement reveals another puzzle piece as to “who knew what when”, while his wife’s strong links to the Labor Party, where she began working in 2012 while her Facebook friend ­Finance Minister Katy Gallagher was Territory chief minister, raise questions about the politicisation of Ms Higgins’ allegation.

Ms Yates told the inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system this month that she first became aware of Ms Higgins’ sexual ­assault allegation against colleague Bruce Lehrmann while attending a community event as a guest speaker on January 30, 2021.

Ms Yates was speaking at a multicultural community event called Build Resilience Against ­Violence alongside Mr Fisk.

“During a break in the presentation, [redacted] indicated to me that he was working with a young woman who was about to make a sexual assault disclosure that would likely be significant in terms of national media attention,” Ms Yates’ statement said.

“He said he was gathering messages of support for the young woman ahead of her ‘going public’ and would appreciate it if I could provide a letter of support.”

Mr Fisk’s name was redacted from Ms Yates’ statement as well as from a flyer for the community event that was tendered to the ­inquiry. The board of inquiry did not respond to questions about why Mr Fisk’s name was redacted.

The man, now known to be Mr Fisk, emailed Ms Yates after the event, seeking a written expression of support for Ms Higgins.

“The young woman‘s name is Brittany. I’m sorry I can’t provide more details,” he wrote. “Just a short letter of personal support for her would mean a great deal. Thank you!!!!!”

Ms Yates responded on February 3 and included “a brief note to Brittany expressing general words of encouragement”.

“Dear Brittany, I understand you’ve made the decision to speak out this week about a crime that’s been perpetrated against you. I’m writing to say thank you. It is voices like yours that will make it possible for us to drive change. To work ­together towards a system that recognises truth, holds offenders to account and creates space for women and all those affected by sexual violence to tell their stories with dignity,“ she wrote.

“My office and I are here to support you and your family in any way that we can. Know that you’re not alone. You have our thanks and if you would like it, our support, as we stand behind you in your choice to speak out. Take care and go gently this week.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037061

File: 40d3015ed3b8e24⋯.jpg (96.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,Lisa_Wilkinson_and_Brittan….jpg)

File: e3e41f91c5309ec⋯.jpg (129.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaving_the….jpg)

File: 624bac3a2bf1374⋯.jpg (183.79 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Brittany_Higgins_and_partn….jpg)

>>19037048

2/2

On February 15, Ms Higgins’ rape allegation was broadcast on Network 10’s The Project and published on news.com.au after she gave interviews to journalists Lisa Wilkinson and Samantha Maiden.

The Fisks were on the witness list, but never called, at Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial in October. Inquiry exhibits include notes of police statements obtained from the Fisks in July 2021.

Mrs Fisk told police she met Ms Higgins in July 2020 through her boyfriend Mr Sharaz when the couple visited the Fisks’ home “for a catch up”. “Later on in the evening I was sitting on side of fire with Brittany. She said she felt harassed at work. Did not tell me the details, but made agreement to catch up later,” the notes say.

In August 2020 the Fisks, Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz went to an indoor skiing centre in Canberra where they “ate pizza and drank wine”. Afterwards they went to Mr Sharaz’s apartment where they sat around talking.

“David asked Brittany if he could tell me something and she nodded,” Mrs Fisk recounted to police. “David said Brittany had been sexually assaulted at Parliament House.”

In November 2020 Mrs Fisk caught up with Ms Higgins at the Kingston Foreshore where the young Liberal staffer “spoke about work and how much she loved her job” but also said she was “struggling with what happened”.

Mrs Fisk said that between ­December 2020 and January 2021 she would “sporadically” catch up with Ms Higgins but “Brittany would cancel”.

“Prior to media, I knew Brittany was out drinking with her work colleagues, back to Parliament House, discovered next morning in bad position on couch,” her statement said.

Mr Fisk’s police statement was similar. He said that when they were at Mr Sharaz’s apartment in mid-2020 Ms Higgins told them that a “senior colleague took her to Parliament House” and that she was “so drunk she could not sign” her name at the security entrance.

“Woke up in minister’s office being raped,” Ms Higgins had told him, according to his police statement. “In next few months began talking to myself and Sandra about going to media and police.”

In January last year, Mr Fisk was awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia for service to the community through social welfare organisations. He was nominated by Mr Sharaz who he had known since at least 2019.

Mr Sharaz congratulated Mr Fisk, 55, on social media.

“Being able to support @BrittHiggins_ has only been made possible by leaning on people like Martin Fisk when things are tough,” he tweeted.

“So proud he’s been awarded an OAM for his work as CEO of @Menslink.”

Mr Fisk, who is a volunteer board member of not-for-profit charity Fearless Women, left Menslink lastDecember after almost 12 years with the organisation.

In February he took up a temporary role as senior director of public advocacy at the ACT Human Rights Commission, which also employs Ms Yates.

The commission and Mr Fisk did not respond to questions by deadline.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/menslink-ceo-martin-fisk-tipped-off-heidi-yates-about-brittany-higginss-rape-claim/news-story/d2f43cf433d283817fde58832252ab61

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037068

File: 53e57f7ae62d8e1⋯.jpg (119.24 KB,940x627,940:627,The_bills_are_part_of_a_co….jpg)

File: 5363ab378bd3935⋯.jpg (139.38 KB,1580x889,1580:889,Jeremy_Buckingham_said_the….jpg)

File: 46178b6769e8c42⋯.jpg (921.77 KB,3000x2250,4:3,Cannabis_generates_8_billi….jpg)

File: b4fa262123c60c4⋯.jpg (278.79 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Sydney_man_David_said_cann….jpg)

Legalise Cannabis party introduces personal use bills in NSW, Victoria and Western Australia

Sean Tarek Goodwin and Ashleigh Barraclough - 20 June 2023

The Legalise Cannabis party has today introduced bills to legalise marijuana for personal use in parliaments in Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia.

It is the first time the same bill has been tabled in three states on the same day.

The bills have been introduced to the states' upper houses and will need support from major parties to become law.

It will not allow people under 18 to access cannabis, or permit driving while impaired by the drug.

New South Wales upper house MP Jeremy Buckingham said the reform would allow people over the age of 18 to grow up to six cannabis plants in their households.

It would also allow people to gift small quantities to other people but driving under the influence of the drug would remain prohibited.

"This is a historic move by the Legalise Cannabis Party across Australia to bring a coordinated reform for cannabis legalisation," Mr Buckingham said.

He said the intention of the reform was to divert people who use cannabis from the criminal justice system, which has seen over 700,000 cannabis-related offences nationally since 2010.

Police also estimate cannabis generates $8 billion in profits for organised crime each year.

"The wider community wants cannabis law reform," Mr Buckingham said.

"They've seen how successful medicinal cannabis has been and are sick of governments wasting billions of dollars of taxpayers' money on people who are going to before the courts for simple cannabis possession."

'Majority of Victorians support regulation'

Victorian Legalise Cannabis MP David Ettershank told ABC Radio Melbourne the public was on board with the change.

"The majority of Victorians support the regulation of cannabis, and a huge number of Victorians … regularly consume cannabis," he said.

"Cannabis needs to be taken out of the world of crime and regulated intelligently."

He said politicians across the political spectrum had expressed to him a desire to change cannabis laws.

"There's a lot of politicians, again from both sides of the house, who use cannabis," he said.

"What we need to do is to regulate, we need to educate, and then we need to normalise this, such that we minimise any adverse social outcomes as a result."

Western Australian contingent acknowledges misuse potential

Western Australian Legalise Cannabis Party upper house member Brian Walker said the party would look to create a regulated market for cannabis products down the track.

"We want to move further and actually take it to the stage of actually being taxable so we can get some revenue as a government for that," the former GP said.

He said that while cannabis could be associated with an increase in psychosis, tobacco and alcohol were more harmful.

"Cannabis is a healthy healing herb that can be misused," Dr Walker said.

"Those two are much more dangerous when it comes to creating psychosis than cannabis, so then you have to ask, 'Why are alcohol and tobacco freely available?'"

He said the experience in the ACT with cannabis reform had demonstrated that it would create minimal harms.

"Deaths haven't gone up, people have behaved quite normally, there's been no impact whatsoever," Dr Walker said.

Sydney resident David told the ABC he was in favour of reform, based on his observations of other parts of the world where it has been legalised.

"I think it's managed as a health issue much better when it's done as a non-criminal matter," he said.

"It calms you down, it stops people from causing trouble, it helps the body with issues," another said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-20/legalise-cannabis-party-bill-nsw-wa-victoria/102498976

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037075

File: 4e3b287b0b1a393⋯.jpg (92.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,Premier_Daniel_Andrews_spe….jpg)

File: 9b151304e60c620⋯.jpg (104.76 KB,1280x720,16:9,Premier_Daniel_Andrews_and….jpg)

File: ab1caee4b2fa1ce⋯.jpg (78.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_foreign_Minister_an….jpg)

>>19026316

Daniel Andrews defends Israel, saying he would have voted against his faction’s Palestine motion

RACHEL BAXENDALE - JUNE 20, 2023

Daniel Andrews has issued a staunch defence of Israel’s sovereignty, voicing his opposition to his own faction’s motion on Palestinian recognition, which passed without dissent at Labor’s Victorian conference on Sunday.

Recommitting to comments he made three weeks ago that the Jewish homeland represented the “only true democracy” in the Middle East, the Victorian Premier indicated he would oppose any motion regarding the recognition of Palestine at the national ALP conference due to be held in August.

Sunday’s motion called on the Albanese government to recognise a Palestinian state ­before the next election, setting the stage for the matter to become a focal point at the national conference in Brisbane.

The proposal, moved by Mr Andrews’ Socialist Left faction, passed on voices after the Right opted to avoid a public debate over a vote they didn’t have the numbers to win.

It follows comments Mr Andrews made on May 30 at Victorian parliament’s celebration of the 75 anniversary of Israel’s independence, at which he described the country as “a beacon of democratic freedom, the only true democracy in the region, one might argue.”

Asked about those comments on Tuesday, Mr Andrews said Israel was indeed, “the only place in the region with a pride march, the only place in the region where women are treated equally … I can go on and on.”

“My position on Israel has been very, very consistent and clear. It’s not always popular, but it’s my view, and it won’t change,” the Premier said.

Asked whether his views were consistent with Sunday’s motion, Mr Andrews said: “Well I can only be consistent. What a state conference does in relation to these matters is a matter for the conference. They’re not binding resolutions. There’s a good deal of difference of opinion on this. My position is crystal clear.

“If I’d been there I wouldn’t have voted for it, but I wasn’t there.”

Mr Andrews distanced himself from factional politics, saying he had not attended a factional meeting since becoming Labor leader 13 years ago.

“My position on these matters is very, very clear. The Jewish community know it. The broader community knows it,” he said.

“Israel has every right to be safe and secure in well-defined borders, and if you want peace, you need a partner for peace. You need a partner, and without a partner, this is all just words, really. Words and tragedy.

“We all want something better for that region. Absolutely we do, but motions at state conference won’t get us there.

“National conference will have to deal with these issues. My position won’t change when we get to the national conference either.”

Mr Andrews’s views put him on a collision course with former foreign affairs Minister and NSW premier Bob Carr, who told The Australian on Sunday that the motion “was not a surprise”.

“It’s very important all supporters of [a] two state solution send the message to both sides and the best way for us to help make that happen is to join 138 nations which already recognise Palestine,” he said.

Australia, Israel & Jewish Affairs Council executive director Colin Rubenstein said: “The motion states that 138 other countries have recognised Palestine, but omits the crucial fact that Sweden is the only Western democracy to have done so, while most of the others did so in the context of the Cold War, when they did not recognise Israel.”

“There are very good reasons why none of our allies have taken this premature and destructive step, and if Labor genuinely cares about Middle East peace, it must emulate them.

“This counter-productive and frankly juvenile motion is phrased as rescuing the two-state solution, but in fact, resolutions such as this are setbacks to the peace process.

“The crucial fact, which this motion clearly ignores, is that the reason there is no peace is the intransigence of the Palestinian leadership, which has repeatedly rebuffed all efforts to achieve a two-state resolution.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/daniel-andrews-defends-israel-saying-he-would-have-voted-against-his-factions-palestine-motion/news-story/68650b861c095cd1347c30d8345f3b91

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037087

File: 536e35b618550bb⋯.jpg (4.05 MB,7253x5159,7253:5159,Detective_Superintendent_L….jpg)

‘It’s in the psyche of some people’: How predators get close to children

Perry Duffin - June 20, 2023

1/2

The NSW child abuse squad has arrested 10 alleged paedophiles every week this year and is convicting more and more offenders who infiltrate families, schools and social media to prey on children.

But as victims and detectives pay the psychological toll, authorities warn online child abuse content is proliferating in Australia, where tech giants are yet to meet “minimum expectations” in key areas.

Detective Superintendent Linda Howlett, in her 41 years with a badge, has questioned countless paedophiles.

“It’s in the psyche of some people,” Howlett said. “They’re happy to talk to you about it, they’re trying to justify why they’ve done it. And they believe it.”

Howlett commands the 240 officers of the child abuse squad across 19 locations. But they find the same stories everywhere: offenders who are not motivated by money, power or lifestyle but what Howlett calls a “unique mindset”.

The squad had arrested 259 people and laid 1008 charges by the beginning of June this year.

Howlett finds paedophiles are often social chameleons: seemingly unremarkable, helpful and polite as they look for opportunities to get near children.

“Often they’re the people parents couldn’t talk highly enough about,” Howlett said.

“They volunteer for school groups, camps, sporting activities, they look around for single parent families to help them go shopping or gardening.

“They not only groom children, they groom families. You’re not going to leave your children with someone you don’t trust.”

Child abuse cases are notoriously difficult to prosecute, Howlett said, because the crimes are so shocking while the accused are often dearly trusted relatives or friends.

“I’ve spoken to jurors, after I’ve lost trials, and a lot of people just can’t believe someone would physically sexually assault a child,” Howlett said. “They think it’s impossible.”

There has been a steady increase in the number of people convicted over child abuse material in NSW since 2018. Almost 80 per cent of the 301 defendants prosecuted last year were found guilty, according to the Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

Each year the child abuse squad takes on about 5500 to 6500 new cases. It’s the single largest squad in NSW Police’s State Crime Command.

The names and faces of suspected paedophiles are pinned around the office in Parramatta police headquarters.

Their digital footprints are key to convictions in difficult cases, but that means detectives must confront the heinous material.

“I’d be naive to say it doesn’t take a toll,” Howlett said.

The officers seal themselves in soundproof booths to review the evidence. The sound and visuals are so traumatic they must be careful not to expose coworkers unnecessarily.

That’s why the officers rarely talk about their work with friends or family, Howlett said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037096

File: 33161f2489522e4⋯.jpg (2.55 MB,5831x3887,5831:3887,eSafety_Commissioner_Julie….jpg)

>>19037087

2/2

Australia’s internet safety watchdog has recorded growing demand for child abuse material.

There were 8000 reports of child sexual abuse material made to the eSafety Commissioner in the first three months of 2023 alone. That is triple the same period in 2022.

“We believe it’s predominantly being driven by increased global demand and supply of this horrific material – a trend we’d contend has been supercharged since the onset of the pandemic,” Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said this month.

Grant last week rejected two of seven codes drafted by tech giants to reduce child sexual abuse and pro-terror content online saying they “simply don’t go far enough” to protect children.

Those proposed codes would not have required tech giants to scan and flag online file storage or email for child abuse material.

Grant said the proposed codes “still don’t meet our minimum expectations” and the commission would now draw up regulations for apps, search engines and AI.

Those codes will allow eSafety to investigate and fine companies $700,000 a day for ongoing breaches.

A recent US study found Instagram’s algorithms were advertising “self-generated” child abuse material – illegal images made by minors – to networks of adult buyers.

Instagram’s parent company, Meta, said it was fighting back aggressively by disabling almost half a million accounts in January and dismantling 27 child abuse networks in two years.

“We’re committed to continuing our work to protect teens, obstruct criminals, and support law enforcement in bringing them to justice,” a spokesperson said.

Howlett urges parents to be cautious, not paranoid, by keeping their profiles locked down and cautious with photographs of their children.

“It’s rewarding work,” she said of her job. “You are doing what you joined the police force to do.

“How many people can retire and say I really made a difference? I really saved another person.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/it-s-in-the-psyche-of-some-people-how-predators-get-close-to-children-20230608-p5df66.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037107

File: b4dc624fb8aaab5⋯.jpg (1.76 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Samantha_Crompvoets_says_s….jpg)

File: 4a791df4fbd4efa⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,5311x3541,5311:3541,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

>>18934029

Be brave, strip soldiers’ medals, says expert who sparked war crimes inquiry

Matthew Knott - June 9, 2023

1/2

The sociologist who triggered the Brereton war crimes inquiry has urged Defence Minister Richard Marles to stare down veterans’ groups by stripping medals from soldiers who oversaw alleged wrongdoing in Afghanistan, saying it will reflect poorly on the nation if no action is taken.

Samantha Crompvoets, an expert on organisational culture, was commissioned by the Department of Defence in 2015 to produce a report that led to military personnel disclosing claims of unlawful behaviour including alleged war crimes.

In her first interview since a Federal Court judge found Ben Roberts-Smith to be a murderer and war criminal when dismissing his defamation case last week, Crompvoets said the decorated former soldier should lose his Victoria Cross for bringing the Australian Defence Force into disrepute.

Crompvoets said Australians should prepare to hear confronting allegations at possible future criminal trials flowing from the Brereton inquiry.

“Ben Roberts-Smith is not necessarily the worst offender,” she said, based on hundreds of hours interviewing Afghanistan war veterans including special operations commanders.

“We’ve not seen the worst of it is what I’d say.”

As well as facing calls to strip Roberts-Smith of his Victoria Cross, Marles is considering whether to remove distinguished service awards from a small number of Afghanistan war commanders.

Crompvoets said: “If the medals are removed, it sends the message that leaders are accountable and responsible for what happens below them, that there is no honour being associated with alleged war crimes and that when one person commits an atrocity it stains the entire unit.

“If they don’t remove them, they will be giving in to the vocal few people who remain wilfully ignorant about what happened in Afghanistan.

“It will reflect poorly on us as a nation, and it will not be looked upon kindly by history.”

Crompvoets acknowledged this would require bravery because the prospect of revoking military honours has already attracted a backlash from veterans groups including the Returned and Services League (RSL) and the Australian Special Air Service (SAS) Association.

“Removing the medals is a courageous thing for the government to do and would draw a line in the sand about what they believe in terms of accountability and ethics,” she said.

Explaining why commanders should be held accountable for alleged wrongdoing by more junior soldiers, Crompvoets used the analogy of a relay team that is stripped of its Olympic medals because one member was found to be using performance-enhancing drugs.

Australian Defence Force Chief Angus Campbell wrote to several Afghanistan war veterans last month to inform them their honours for distinguished and conspicuous service could soon be cancelled if Marles accepts his recommendation to do so.

Veterans groups are aware of at least seven veterans who held command positions in Afghanistan who have received these letters.

A spokeswoman for Marles confirmed Campbell had provided him with recommendations on command accountability.

“The deputy prime minister in his capacity as minister for defence is considering the recommendations and seeking advice as appropriate,” the spokeswoman said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037111

File: 065e9f73707ecb5⋯.jpg (1.83 MB,4359x2906,3:2,Defence_Force_Chief_Angus_….jpg)

>>19037107

2/2

Crompvoets said some soldiers had told her the culture inside the SAS had improved since the Brereton inquiry, but she added: “Where is the transparency from Defence about what changes have been made and why? Where is the thought leadership, the speeches and essays on what has been learnt?”

She said there was still a hypermasculine “cult of warrior worship” in the military that needed to be questioned.

“I’m not reassured by someone like [Opposition Leader] Peter Dutton coming out and saying the culture of the SAS has changed,” she said. “We know it takes a lot of time for culture to change.”

Crompvoets said her work for the federal government, her main source of income, evaporated after Dutton criticised her type of research in 2021, with the then-defence minister saying he did not want the military to be “distracted by things that have happened in the past”.

“There has been an enormous personal and professional cost because of the backlash I received from my work on this,” she said.

She added she was the target of misogynist abuse in online veterans groups where her phone number was published.

Crompvoets first heard accounts of troubling behaviour by Australian troops in Afghanistan when she was commissioned to write an unrelated report on the role of special forces in responding to domestic terror attacks following the 2014 Sydney Lindt Cafe siege.

In a subsequent report delivered to senior Defence officials in 2016, Crompvoets identified a number of “deeply concerning norms” within the special forces, including “competition killing” and “blood lust”, the inhumane treatment of prisoners and cover-ups of unlawful killings.

Her work led to the Brereton inquiry, which found credible evidence to implicate 25 current or former ADF personnel in the alleged unlawful killing of 39 individuals and the cruel treatment of two others.

One soldier has since been charged with a war crime offence, and the Office of the Special Investigator has said it is investigating around 40 other matters.

Martin Hamilton-Smith, the chair of the SAS Association, said Marles would set an “extraordinary precedent” if he accepts Campbell’s recommendation to remove medals.

“We strongly disagree with punishment of any kind, including the removal of medals, being administered before the soldier in question is found guilty by a court of law,” he said.

Hamilton-Smith said there was a risk of an “over-reaction” to allegations of war crimes and the estimated 30,000 Australians who served in Afghanistan should not be painted as war criminals.

“Our soldiers are not police officers and the battlefield in Afghanistan is not Kings Cross on a Saturday night,” he said.

He questioned why high-ranking officers including Campbell – who received a Distinguished Service Cross for overseeing Australian troops in Afghanistan – did not face the prospect of having their medals stripped.

If you are a current or former ADF member, or a relative, and need counselling or support, contact the Defence All-Hours Support Line on 1800 628 036 or Open Arms on 1800 011 046.

https://www.defence.gov.au/adf-members-families/health-well-being/services-support-fighting-fit/need-help-now/all-hours-support-line

https://www.defence.gov.au/adf-members-families/health-well-being

https://www.openarms.gov.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/be-brave-strip-soldiers-medals-says-expert-who-sparked-war-crimes-inquiry-20230608-p5dey8.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037124

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18934029

>>19037107

Jacqui Lambie wants International Criminal Court to investigate military commanders for alleged war crimes

Matthew Doran - 20 June 2023

1/2

Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie has requested the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague investigate senior Australian Defence Force (ADF) commanders over their knowledge of alleged war crimes in Afghanistan.

Senator Lambie has been scathing in her assessment of Major General Paul Brereton's landmark inquiry into allegations of serious misconduct by Australian special forces — a redacted version of which was made public in late 2020.

She has argued the ADF's high command has avoided scrutiny and accountability over what they knew of unlawful killings and cruel treatment of prisoners, despite recollections from former SAS personnel and testimony in court suggesting rumours were well known by the top brass.

"When you have the power that those military commanders do, in throwing their diggers under the bus, and you walk away and you say you have nothing to do with this — well, I've warned them for years," Senator Lambie said.

"It's one in, all in.

"And if you're not going to look at yourself, then by bloody oath I'll make sure you're looked at."

The request for the ICC to investigate references media reporting, questioning of Chief of the Defence Force Angus Campbell by Senator Lambie in Senate estimates, and testimony from the defamation trial launched by former SAS soldier Ben Roberts-Smith as reasons for prosecutors to step in.

Among the material cited are quotes from a former SAS patrol commander, saying "everyone knew".

Veteran and military lawyer Glenn Kolomeitz drafted the request to the ICC.

"It's now obviously in the hands of the of the prosecutor," he said.

"One of the prosecutors policies … is to refer it back to the state party — so in this case back to Australia for consideration.

"The onus will then be on the Australian government to give some serious consideration as to why Australia has not investigated the command responsibility aspects of the Afghanistan allegations and what they're going to do about it."

Mr Kolomeitz said the legal test was that commanders "knew or should have known" of the allegations.

"That's the old test going back to the Second World War," he said.

Higher command given a 'blanket exemption' in Brereton inquiry

In the wake of the Brereton report being released, which recommended 19 soldiers be investigated, the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) was established to further consider the allegations.

Senator Lambie and Mr Kolomeitz argued the Brereton Inquiry had focused on ADF personnel on the ground in Afghanistan, rather than those overseeing Australia's commitment to Coalition efforts in Afghanistan.

"Nobody has investigated the higher command because Major General Brereton, in his report, said that he gave that blanket exemption — which is a term that a government oversight body gave — a blanket exemption to the higher commanders.

General Campbell said that he referred only the people who were recommended for referral by Major General Brereton to the OSI for investigation.

"So the Australian government is inactive in investigating the higher command, they haven't investigated, they aren't investigating," Mr Kolomeitz said.

"And to be brutally frank, if Australia does say we are investigating, there's such a massive problem with the way we implemented the command responsibility law into Australian law that the investigation could never be genuine anyway."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037130

File: a4af9225676eb39⋯.jpg (1.16 MB,4126x2750,2063:1375,Jacqui_Lambie_joined_force….jpg)

File: ac49fa877011930⋯.jpg (1.16 MB,3600x2396,900:599,Australian_special_forces_….jpg)

File: 88c5e45a1ec5a67⋯.jpg (952.07 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Angus_Campbell_announced_t….jpg)

File: 77083518f6d0753⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Richard_Marles_has_offered….jpg)

>>19037124

2/2

Chief of Defence Force's knowledge questioned

Chief of the Defence Force, Angus Campbell was in charge of Australian forces in Afghanistan for part of the period the Brereton Inquiry investigated.

"General Campbell … states that, on the 34 occasions that he visited Afghanistan from his headquarters in Dubai, he met with ADF members but on no occasions were reports of wrongdoing put before him," the submission to the ICC said.

"The upshot is, he and successive Commanders of Joint Task Force 633 (JTF633) were clear on notice that allegations of wrongdoing had been made, such as that earlier Commanders of JTF633 appointed inquiries at various levels, but he did not exercise his duty to inquire.

"Rather he waited for reports of wrongdoing to be put before him and, when no such reporters were forthcoming, his job in Afghanistan was done."

In the submission, Mr Kolomeitz said that was out of line with established legal precedent on the "active duty imposed on the commander to inquire".

Defence minister offers meeting to senator

Senator Lambie had tried to table documents relating to the ICC request in parliament earlier, but had her motion denied.

Defence Minister Richard Marles offered to meet with Senator Lambie shortly after.

"Since taking office in May 2022, the government has been focused on ensuring that takes place, and that work is ongoing," a spokesperson for Mr Marles said in a statement.

"As part of that, the Chief of the Defence Force (CDF) has considered the command accountability of current and former serving Australian Defence Force (ADF) members who held command positions during the periods in which the Inspector-General of the ADF found credible information of incidents of alleged unlawful conduct as identified in the Afghanistan Inquiry.

"The CDF has presented the relevant material to the Deputy Prime Minister for consideration. The Deputy Prime Minister in his capacity as Minister for Defence is considering the recommendations and seeking advice as appropriate."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-20/jacqui-lambie-military-war-crimes-icc-criminal-court/102501172

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmSDSKiFENE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037159

File: f69113efcd65309⋯.jpg (508.04 KB,1769x1200,1769:1200,Donald_Trump_Jr_listens_as….jpg)

>>18860803 (pb)

>>18940139

>>18965978

Donald Trump Jr. Faces Calls to Be Banned From Australia

KATHERINE FUNG - 6/19/23

Donald Trump Jr. is facing calls for his banning in Australia ahead of his upcoming tour there.

Trump, the eldest son of the former president and a prominent conservative voice in his own right, will be headed Down Under for a three-city speaking tour presented by the nonprofit organization Turning Point Australia, with stops in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, from July 9 to 11. He is expected to be joined by former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage.

Trump Jr.'s scheduled appearances have generated calls for the Australian government to block him from entering the country. His Australian critics have launched petitions to ban him from obtaining a visa to come into the country and have vowed to disrupt his speaking engagements.

One Change.org petition, titled "Stop Donald Trump Jr getting an Australian Visa," has gained over 14,000 signatures.

"Donald Trump Jr is an illegal drug-taking bigoted person who should not be allowed to enter Australia for the purpose of earning himself and possibly his father any 'Campaign Contributions,'" the petition's description reads.

Under the reasons for signing the petition, some wrote comments like "No advantages for anyone having Donald Trump Jr visit Australia. Keep him where he belongs USA." Another wrote. "We have enough of our own fascists here. No need to welcome more."

Newsweek reached out by email to the Trump Organization for comment.

Trump Jr. has said he has a "huge fan base in Australia" and that after speaking to some of those supporters "it's clear the same disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture that's crippled the US has clearly taken hold there." He called those issues "the biggest existential threat we face in the West and is literally the decay of Western society."

In a video announcing the tour, he recalled visiting the country during his college years, saying, "I absolutely loved it. Incredible country, amazing people, beautiful scenery."

But some of those people are no fans of his and have planned protests at his speaking engagements. Activists with the Campaign Against Racism and Fascism are planning to demonstrate at his show in Melbourne in a stand against his "white supremacy, transphobia and misogyny," according to one of the protest organizers.

"His visit is likely to be a magnet for far-right and neo-Nazi groups across Melbourne, so we will be there in numbers to send the message that people here reject and despise everything they stand for," the organizer, Omar Hassan, told the Star Observer, an Australian magazine serving the LGBTQ+ community.

Grace Hill, a lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans+ officer with the National Union of Students and another protest organizer, said that demonstrators are fighting back against Turning Point USA's recent actions in an effort to not let similar events occur in Australia.

"Turning Point USA has fought to push through bans on abortions and attacks on trans rights across the U.S.," Hill said. "We will not let them get a foothold in Australia."

She continued: "Donald Trump Junior and Nigel Farage have said they're coming to Australia to fight 'woke' culture. We plan to show them that there is a serious, large left movement here willing to stand up to bigotry in all its forms."

Sky News Australia reported that some Twitter users have expressed their intentions to throw eggs at event attendees.

Tickets for Trump's speeches start at $89 and go up to $295 for meet-and-greet tickets and $495 for backstage passes.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jr-faces-calls-banned-australia-1807710

https://www.change.org/p/stop-donald-trump-jr-getting-an-australian-visa

https://twitter.com/SkyNewsAust/status/1670266294581743616

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037218

File: 8717fd3df46e705⋯.jpg (247.77 KB,1024x768,4:3,Royal_Australian_Navy_ship….jpg)

File: 873831fd0586cbd⋯.jpg (56.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_US_Marine_Corp_MV_22_Osp….jpg)

>>18946058

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023: Largest US amphibious assault ship USS America to dock in Brisbane

Keen ship spotters might be able to catch a glimpse of the US Navy’s mighty vessels off Mackay, Gladstone, Brisbane, Bowen or Townsville over coming weeks.

Jodie Munro O'Brien - June 20, 2023

1/2

The largest amphibious assault ship in the US Navy’s Seventh Fleet is expected to arrive in Brisbane on Tuesday afternoon.

It will be the second time in three years the USS America, which carries fighter jets and tiltrotor aircraft such as MV22-Ospreys, has visited Queensland, but only the first time it has been allowed to dock and its crew to come ashore.

With US Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit on board, the warship is pulling in for a port call before heading off to participate in the 10th iteration of Australia’s largest bilateral combined military training activity with the US, Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023.

The 2500 US sailors and Marines assigned to the landing helicopter assault (LHA 6)-class vessel during Exercise Talisman Sabre 2021 were not allowed off the ship because of Queensland’s Covid-19 pandemic restrictions.

The 257m-long USS America is designed to accommodate the F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters – or stealth multirole combat jets – as well as a combination of rescue, combat and support helicopters including MV22 Ospreys, CH-53E Super Stallions, AH-1Z Super Cobra and UH-1Y Venom aircraft.

Based in Sasebo, Japan, the America is the lead ship of the Seventh Fleet’s Amphibious Ready Group, which also includes the USS Green Bay, a San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock.

Though it won’t be open to the public, the USS America is expected to dock at the Fisherman’s Island Pier at the Port of Brisbane by about 4pm.

It is among the first of several foreign military ships expected to visit the state from at least five allied nations over the coming weeks.

The crews from the visiting ships are part of more than 30,000 military personnel from around the world – almost double the number involved in 2021 – expected to converge on Queensland, parts of northern NSW, Darwin and parts of Western Australia until early August.

The biennial exercise, which culminates in a mock war between all military branches on land, sea and in the air, is designed to train forces in all aspects of combined operations to help improve the combat readiness and interoperability between the Australian Defence Force and its allies.

The peak of the battle is scheduled to take place between July 22 and August 4, with the majority of the conflict generally held along and off the coast of Shoalwater Bay and other parts of Central Queensland.

In April, an Australian Department of Defence spokeswoman said TS23 would comprise a field training exercise incorporating force preparation (logistics) activities, amphibious landings, ground force manoeuvres, urban close combat operations, and air combat and maritime operations.

“Exercise Talisman Sabre is a bilateral, high-intensity war-fighting training activity led by Australia or the US, and other partners which has previously included Japan and New Zealand,” the spokeswoman said.

“It is designed to enhance interoperability, strengthen the Australian-US Alliance, enhance Defence co-operation with like-minded countries in the region, and improve combat readiness.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037253

File: 2fdd2cc4738f4c7⋯.jpg (108.43 KB,1024x769,1024:769,A_helicopter_delivers_supp….jpg)

File: 628654a64878314⋯.jpg (218.53 KB,1024x769,1024:769,The_HMAS_Ballarat_back_and….jpg)

File: becad74aeee0ade⋯.jpg (275.7 KB,1429x1429,1:1,348976529_781439093426953_….jpg)

>>19037218

2/2

Australia and the US take turns leading the biennial military exercise, with the most recent iterations increasingly including other allied forces as participants or observers.

Between 17,000 to 34,000 soldiers, sailors, Marines, airmen and women from around the world have participated in past years.

Troops from New Zealand, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea and Britain embedded with the Australian and US forces participated in Talisman Sabre 2021, while military officers from France, Germany, India, and Indonesia observed.

Nations taking part in Talisman Sabre this year include Fiji, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, France, Britain, Canada and Germany.

The Philippines, Singapore and Thailand are attending as observers.

The “high end” warfighting scenarios are mostly conducted throughout the ADF’s 454,500ha Shoalwater Bay training area in Byfield, about 80km north of Rockhampton, as well as in adjacent maritime and airspace areas of the Coral Sea.

Components of TS21 also took place in Hughenden, Atherton, Mareeba, Cairns, Townsville, the Charters Towers and Ingham regions, as well as along or off the coastal areas of Bundaberg, Bowen, Proserpine, Lucinda, Forest Beach, the ADF Cowley Beach Training Area near Innisfail and the Stanage Bay peninsula, northeast of Rockhampton.

Pilots of fighter jets, attack helicopters and other military aircraft also operated out of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) base Scherger near Weipa in the Cape York Peninsula, RAAF Base Amberley, outside of Ipswich in southeast Queensland, and the RAAF Evans Head Air Weapons Range in NSW.

The initial Talisman Sabre in 2005 comprised 17,500 Americans and Australians with 27,500 personnel involved in the 2007 exercise.

More than 34,000 military personnel converged on the Sunshine state for Talisman Sabre 2019 – up from an originally anticipated 25,000 – along with more than 20 military ships, making it the nation’s largest joint US-Australian military exercise ever held, even piquing the interest of a Chinese spy ship for the second time.

It was also one of the largest gatherings of military ships to visit Brisbane for a single exercise in more than 30 years, and included visits from New Zealand, Canadian, Japanese and Korean vessels, as well as Royal Australian Navy ships.

The Seventh Fleet, which was formed in Brisbane in 1943, is the US Navy’s largest forward-deployed numbered fleet, and routinely interacts and operates with allies and partners in preserving a free and open Indo-Pacific region.

The ROKS Wang Geon, a Chungmugong Yi Sun-sin-class missile destroyer in the Republic of Korea Navy also took part in TS21 for the first time after observing during 2019, while the Japanese Self Defense Force took part for their second time, after first being an observer during TS17, and sent the JS Makinami, a Takanami class destroyer.

The Royal Canadian Navy’s HMCS Calgary, a Halifax-class frigate, was also among the other foreign military ships that joined in with Exercise Talisman Sabre in 2021, while the HMAS Canberra and the HMAS Choules were two of the Royal Australian Navy ships that participated.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/largest-us-amphibious-assault-ship-uss-america-to-dock-in-brisbane/news-story/c301c264994f3ef6fa4ed23345e8156e

>Talisman Sabre

>MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19037314

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18723374 (pb)

>>18928670

>>19031624

Meet the Architect behind the 'Voice'... who literally wrote the book

Advance Australia

June 19 2023

Divisive and aggressive commentary by Referendum Working Group activist Thomas Mayo has destroyed the Prime Minister’s claims that the Voice to Parliament is “a modest request” about “two things only: recognition and listening”.

Mayo, the union official and self-described “militant” who wrote the book on the proposed constitutional change, has spoken candidly about the referendum’s aims, describing the Voice as a campaign tool to “punish politicians”, “abolish colonialist institutions” and “pay the rent, pay reparations and compensation”.

Rather than what the PM described as an “inspiring and unifying Australian moment”, Mayo told a conference of communists that “there is nothing that we can do that is more powerful than building a first nations' Voice, a black institution, a black political force to be reckoned with”.

At a 2021 Invasion Day protest where he described “the powers that be” as “murderers”, he said he was “sick of governments not listening to our voice” so planned “to use the rulebook of the nation to force them”.

Mayo revealed the divisive aims behind the Voice at Invasion Day and Black Lives Matter protests as well as in numerous addresses revealing the Voice’s radical origins to the Search Foundation, which is described on its website as a “successor organisation of the Communist Party of Australia”.

Mayo is also on the board of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition Ltd alongside people like Wesfarmers Chairman Michael Chaney and Liberal strategist Tony Nutt and lobbyist Mark Textor.

It is shocking that distinguished Australians like Chaney and Nutt would share board duties with someone who so hates Australia and speaks openly of tearing down its institutions.

By choosing Mayo to stand at his side to announce the wording of the referendum question, the Prime Minister has endorsed and adopted his very public statements about the Voice and the consequences of this constitutional change.

Mayo sits on the Referendum Working Group that agreed to the question.

Not only is he the author of the book on the Voice, he is the author of the referendum question.

Australians must now hear in Mayo’s own words his plan to divide the nation.

The Prime Minister has left open many questions about the Voice, and Thomas Mayo’s answers will be shocking for Australians who will now see through the ‘yes’ campaign’s spin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=655mzGRmkZw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19043992

File: 3e6642da7c9bec2⋯.jpg (102.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Sussan_Ley_has_demanded_Li….jpg)

File: df92bcd8a12f409⋯.jpg (115.54 KB,1024x768,4:3,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

File: 0e2f81a7e95b300⋯.jpg (105.06 KB,1024x768,4:3,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 6ddc65ee4e258f8⋯.jpg (104.54 KB,1280x720,16:9,Sussan_Ley_says_Ms_Burney_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Indigenous Voice stirs minister’s emotions as Coalition demands Australia Day answers

ELLEN RANSLEY AND CATIE MCLEOD - JUNE 21, 2023

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney insists she wants to close the gap rather than engage in culture wars as the federal opposition demands answers about the Voice referendum.

Ms Burney became emotional in parliament on Wednesday as Coalition MPs pursued her over why she had said the Indigenous Voice to parliament and executive government wouldn’t provide advice on changing the date of Australia Day.

Under intense questioning, Ms Burney said creating a constitutionally-enshrined Voice was not about stoking culture wars but helping Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who were “crying out for a different way of doing things”.

“I have been to communities where there are 30 people living in two bedroom homes. I have been to communities where babies are drinking sweet cordial instead of water because it is cheaper.

“I have taken a friend, who died at 43 from end-of-life renal failure, to visit his son in jail. I have seen friends die (who) are very young and their conditions in life when they were young were terrible.

“So do not tell me what I do or do not know about Aboriginal Australia.”

Ms Burney’s comments came after South Australian Liberal MP Tony Pasin asked her where in the proposed Constitutional amendment to enshrine the Voice does it say the advisory body would be restricted from offering advice on any issue it chose.

In response, Ms Burney said “I am sorry that it appears you are unable to read the very simple instructions for what this is about”.

She withdrew the comment after Mr Pasin asked her to and told parliament he had grown up in a house where English wasn’t spoken as a first language.

Liberal MP Melissa Price began question time by asking Ms Burney if she had misled parliament with her Australia Day comment, to which Ms Burney said parliament would decide if the date of Australia Day was to change, not the Voice.

Ms Burney made the contested comment on Tuesday as she faced another round of intense questioning about the Voice’s parameters and said the body would not advise on “parking tickets … changing Australia Day (or) all of the ridiculous things that this side has come up with”.

Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley has been leading the push for Ms Burney to clarify her comments, saying the Labor minister had “real questions to answer” about what the Voice would be able to make representations about.

“It is simply not good enough for Linda Burney to say in the parliament the Voice will not make representations on Australia Day and she ruled out other matters that we questioned her on as well,” Ms Ley told reporters on Wednesday morning.

“She’s now being contradicted by experts, including those on the ‘yes’ campaign and her own Referendum Working Group. They’ve taken a completely different position. They’re right, Linda Burney is wrong.

“She needs to come into the parliament, and she needs to correct the record.”

Architects of the Voice including Megan Davis and Noel Pearson have previously said changing the date of Australia Day — which is viewed as a day of mourning by many Indigenous people — is not likely to be among the Voice’s top concerns.

The renewed debate over the Voice’s scope comes after the laws that to set up the referendum on embedding the advisory body in the Constitution passed parliament on Monday.

The passage of the government’s Constitution Alteration Bill through the Senate — 52 votes to 19 — guarantees that the national poll will be held sometime in the final three months of the year.

If the referendum succeeds, the Constitution would be amended to recognise Indigenous Australians as the nation’s First Peoples and to enshrine a permanent, independent Aboriginal and Torres Strait advisory body, or “Voice”, to parliament and the executive government.

The federal Nationals Party and most of the federal Liberal Party — including Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and his deputy Sussan Ley — do not support the Voice and are campaigning against it.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/sussan-ley-demands-linda-burney-answer-australia-day-voice-questions/news-story/13b3f842a22dff3c81711b066694e575

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044003

File: c439ac6f22f6de8⋯.jpg (130.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

>>19043992

Doubt over Linda Burney’s claim Indigenous voice to parliament won’t advise on Australia Day

ROSIE LEWIS - JUNE 21, 2023

1/2

Aboriginal leaders and constitutional law experts have cast doubt over Linda Burney’s declaration in parliament that the voice won’t give advice on changing the date of Australia Day, saying the controversial topic could become an issue the advisory body wants to pursue.

The Indigenous Australians Minister faced a second day of ­intense parliamentary questioning from the Coalition on what would and would not fit within the voice’s remit, after the government’s referendum legislation cleared the parliament and the Yes and No campaigns began ramping up.

Ms Burney, who was asked by deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley if the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government would be able to make representations to the defence force chief on military acquisitions or the ­location of bases, said: “The voice will make representations that ­affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but the voice will not run programs, it will not deliver funding and it will not have the power of veto.

“I can tell you what the voice will not be giving advice on: it won’t be giving advice on parking tickets, it won’t be giving advice on changing Australia Day. It will not be giving advice on all of the ridiculous things that this side has come up with.”

Constitutional law expert ­George Williams, a member of the government’s expert group advising on the constitutional amendment, said whether the voice made representations on Australia Day would be up to its members and parliament could not prevent it from doing so.

“It’s conceivable they would make representations on that,” Professor Williams said.

“The question is ‘matters relating to Indigenous peoples’ and a public holiday commemorating the colonisation of Australia Day might be something they make representations about. I only say ‘might’, we don’t know, but it’d be open to them to do so if they ­wanted and then it would be a judgment call.

“(Ms Burney) may know better than me. It’s her community after all. She may be making a judgment that she doesn’t believe they will. That’s why I don’t think she’s wrong, it’s just a judgment.”

Members of the government’s referendum working group agreed parking tickets would not fit within the voice’s remit but said Australia Day could be an issue on which the advisory body would want to make representations.

Sean Gordon, co-convener for the Liberals for Yes campaign and chairman of Uphold and ­Recognise, said: “I have no doubt it would become part of the ­conversation.”

He believed there were more important matters to focus on than Australia Day but ­acknowledged both Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians were concerned about changing the date.

“When we look at the disparity gaps that exist between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians – how do we improve educational outcomes for Indigenous youth, how do we ­reduce incarceration rates?” Mr Gordon said.

“(Australia Day) could become a part of its remit, but it shouldn’t be the focus of the voice because at the end of the day changing the date isn’t going to address the ­ongoing challenges that exist in our communities.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044006

File: 6bb5e67566b1b85⋯.jpg (96.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_and_m….jpg)

>>19044003

2/2

Tom Calma, who authored the voice co-design report with Marcia Langton, also said advice on moving Australia Day could be put to government by the advisory body if it was of great importance to members but he believed more tangible issues should be prioritised. “It (Australia Day) could very well be, if it’s seen as a priority for them,” he said.

“I think people will be very surprised as to how responsible Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are in addressing the issues of significance to our wellbeing. I wouldn’t see that (Australia Day) as a high priority with the voice. Not in the first instance. There are plenty of other matters that should be considered.”

Another Aboriginal leader who wanted to remain anonymous said if Aboriginal communities thought Australia Day was a problem, they would talk to their voice representatives who would then offer advice.

Ms Ley said Australians were rightly confused about the voice and Anthony Albanese and Ms Burney were responsible.

“Linda Burney claims the voice will only make representations ‘on matters which affect Aboriginal peoples differently’ but told the parliament the voice won’t make representations on Australia Day,” she said. “The point is if Minister Burney is confident enough to make a specific claim, that Australia Day is out of bounds for the voice, why isn’t she able to rule out it having a role in the siting of defence bases, or a role in the national curriculum? Where is the detail?”

The Prime Minister on Tuesday conceded undecided Australians wanted more information about the voice.

The Yes campaign plans to explain its practical outcomes better as the campaign progresses.

“It’s always easier to get a No vote than it is to get a Yes vote in a referendum,” Mr Albanese told KIIS Melbourne radio.

“History tells us that that is the case. It’s something like eight successful out of 48. So, that’s not a great strike rate. But this is such a sensible reform.”

Outspoken independent senator Lidia Thorpe revealed she wanted to contribute to the voice No pamphlet, accusing the government of failing to “come good” on her demand for action on the Royal Commission into Deaths in Custody recommendations.

She and the black sovereign movement are campaigning against the voice, splintering the Aboriginal vote, just weeks after Senator Thorpe said she was planning to boycott the referendum.

“This is about asserting our sovereign status in this country and the fact that we don’t accept any colonial mechanism that continues to control us, which is what the voice ultimately is a part of,” Senator Thorpe said. “It has no power, it will be controlled by the parliament so we are here to say we don’t accept that. That is not good enough and we want to have a conversation with the so-called other sovereign who apparently lives in another country and apparently is named the King.”

A majority of MPs who voted for and against the Constitution Alteration Bill must respectively authorise the Yes and No pamphlets, which the AEC will need to receive by July 18.

Indigenous leader Pat Anderson, who stood alongside Mr Albanese as he declared his intention to campaign for the voice to parliament, said on Tuesday politicians should stay out of the debate, although she acknowledged they would be talking to their constituents.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/doubt-over-linda-burneys-claim-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-wont-advise-on-australia-day/news-story/e025c3b547e747cb97457b8d934176f2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044017

File: 0723c53c93bdc66⋯.jpg (123.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Yes23_campaign_director_De….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

>>19043992

Yes23 campaign director linked voice to January 26

GEOFF CHAMBERS and ROSIE LEWIS - JUNE 21, 2023

1/2

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin told a religious forum that the voice to parliament was the mechanism for Indigenous Australians to influence change on Australia Day and “any other issues” impacting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

In an “Exploring 26th January” online forum hosted by Evangelisation Brisbane, Mr Parkin said a constitutionally enshrined voice was the vehicle for Indigenous Australians to have a seat at the table and ensure that the focus of decision-makers was on “truth”.

“We need to make sure that we have that voice in place because that … constitutionally guaranteed voice is going to be the mechanism that allows us a seat at the table to ensure that these conversations around truth, be it on the 26th, be it on any other issues that’s affecting our people, that we have a real say and we have a real opportunity to actually influence change,” Mr Parkin told Brisbane Archbishop Mark Coleridge in a video posted on January 20 last year.

“Because I don’t want to be here … in 30 years time, 40 years time having the same conversation. That’s why we need that voice in place to make sure that when we think about these issues that are approaching, the 26th or anything else, that we have a genuine seat at the table and that’s the opportunity that’s before us. I believe we’ll get there.

“And hopefully we’ll be able to make more of an impact and have more of a say in changing the trajectory of our nation.”

Mr Parkin sat on the First Nations Referendum Working Group alongside prominent Indigenous leaders including Thomas Mayo, Noel Pearson, Megan Davis and Pat Anderson.

A Yes23 campaign spokesman told The Australian that Mr Parkin was invited to speak on a panel last year on the topic of January 26 as “part of ongoing engagement with the Catholic Church”.

“His comments did not canvas changing the date of Australia Day, but referenced discussion of the date as part of the annual national conversation,” the Yes23 spokesman said.

“Mr Parkin has been consistently clear that a voice will be focused on practical issues that matter to Indigenous communities, like health services, education and jobs.”

New national polling of 3,444 Australians by the No campaign in the week to June 1 claims that changing or abolishing Australia Day is a hot-button issue for voters. The polling shows a dramatic jump in opposition to the voice to parliament and executive government if it led to Australia Day being abolished altogether.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044020

File: 30878d9f28ab5df⋯.jpg (136.32 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>19044017

2/2

In Question Time on Wednesday, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said the voice to parliament referendum “is not about culture wars” and distanced herself from her claim the day before that the advisory body won’t offer advice on Australia Day.

“It is not the policy of this government to change the date of Australia Day. Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have strong views about Australia Day but it is the parliament that makes those decisions and it is clear from the question that we are putting to the Australian people (at the referendum) that the power of the parliament will not change,” Ms Burney said.

“The voice may give advice but the parliament retains its primacy, the parliament will make laws. Subsection three (of the voice constitutional amendment) lays this out clearly.

“And it would do well for people to listen to this: the parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have the power to make laws with respect to matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures.”

Ms Burney said “this is not about culture wars, this is about closing the gap.

“This isn’t about division, this is about bringing people together. This isn’t about tokenism, it’s about making a practical difference,” she said.

“The voice will not be bothered by culture wars. It will focus on the practical differences in terms of closing the gap. It will focus on matters specific to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people or matters that affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people differently, and the key word there is ‘differently’.

“The word ‘differently’ talks about things like the 10-year gap in life expectancy. It talks about the chance that our young people are more incarcerated than possibly going to university. It talks about infant and maternal mortality. It talks about children born at lower birth weights, high rates of family violence, lower rates of finishing school and higher rates of unemployment, overcrowding in houses. It will not be involved in culture wars.”

The Australian can reveal that in 2005, Ms Burney told the NSW Parliament that “Australia Day and survival day are moving closer together: a true understanding of our shared history and the truth about our nation”.

“I do not believe 26 January is the appropriate day, contrary to the feelings of many Australians. However, 26 January in Marrickville and Canterbury was inspiring,” Ms Burney said in a statement to NSW Parliament about Australia Day celebrations in her then state electorate.

Deputy Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said “if the Minister herself has argued Australia Day affects Indigenous Australians differently, on what basis could she possibly claim that the Voice will not be giving advice on Australia Day?”

“Minister Burney said she wasn’t interested in the culture wars … but that’s in total contradiction with what she told state parliament as a NSW MP,” Ms Ley said.

Mr Parkin and Ms Burney on Tuesday distanced themselves from comments made by Mr Mayo after The Australian revealed he previously threatened that politicians would be punished if they ignored the voice advisory body.

With the No campaign seizing on Mr Mayo’s comments, Mr Parkin rejected any link between the voice and ‘Pay the Rent’, reparations and compensation, ruled-out punishing politicians and acknowledged the government and parliament of the day could say no to a voice advisory body.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/yes23-campaign-director-linked-voice-to-january-26/news-story/16842f9bfdc1f2cb28bf3d27c061d6e0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044032

File: 15975ed163ce730⋯.jpg (74.87 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prominent_Yes_campaigner_T….jpg)

File: 0723c53c93bdc66⋯.jpg (123.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Yes23_campaign_director_De….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031624

>>19037314

Yes campaign distances itself from Thomas Mayo comments

GEOFF CHAMBERS - JUNE 20, 2023

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney have distanced themselves from comments made by prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo, who threatened that politicians would be punished if they ignore the voice advisory body.

Mr Mayo – who sits on the board of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition which leads the Yes23 campaign – has previously said colonial institutions must be torn down and that the voice was a step towards “reparations and compensation”.

After The Australian revealed comments made by the militant unionist between 2020 and 2023, including calling John Howard a “bastard”, senior Yes campaigners on Tuesday called for a “respectful” conversation.

Mr Parkin said he had spoken with Mr Mayo – who co-authored The Voice to Parliament Handbook with veteran journalist Kerry O’Brien – and described him as a “great champion” who has been having these conversations for years.

But as the No campaign seized on Mr Mayo’s comments, he rejected any link between the voice and ‘Pay the Rent’, reparations and compensation, ruled-out punishing politicians and acknowledged the government and parliament of the day could say no to a voice advisory body.

“There was a bunch of leaders that actually met in Canberra (on Monday) talking about the need for the conversations to be respectful,” Mr Parkin told 2GB.

“We do come from a very broad church in this campaign … on some of these issues we’ve had differences of opinion over the past but when it comes to the voice and the focus on the referendum – everybody is united on that goal.

“We’re not always going to get it right … but the focus is absolutely on bringing people together in a respectful dialogue in the lead up to the referendum. He (Mayo) knows, we know what we need to do from here on in and that’s absolutely what we’re focused on.”

Senior Yes campaign sources told The Australian they strongly backed Mr Mayo and he would maintain a leading presence ahead of the likely October referendum.

Asked by the Coalition about Mr Mayo – a prominent figure on the Albanese government’s referendum working group – Ms Burney told Question Time “it is not about individual statements of people that are involved in this, I am not responsible for what other people say”.

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher – representing Ms Burney – refused to rebuke Mr Mayo in the Senate: “I have always found him to be an articulate and passionate advocate for the voice.”

Amid tightening polls, concerns over the powers of the voice and calls from senior Yes campaigners to shift the focus from the voice to constitutional recognition, Mr Parkin said the advisory body was about taking “politics out” of Indigenous affairs.

Asked whether politicians should be punished, Mr Parkin said “I don’t think that’s the nature of the relationship that we want to set-up here”.

“We want to have a very constructive relationship with the government of the day and the parliament of the day to make sure we are actually getting on with the issues. This has been part of the problem so far, there’s just been too much politics around these issues. Indigenous affairs has been used as a political football,” he said.

Mr Parkin said while parliament would decide after the referendum whether voice positions are appointed or elected, Indigenous communities would hold voice members “to account if they start straying off on things that aren’t actually that important”.

“The voice is absolutely and has always been about getting to the nub of those real issues facing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in communities. Health, education … everyone’s talking about their young people whether it’s in urban areas, remote areas.”

“That’s what the voice will be focused on. I can tell you, when I go out to the communities no-one is talking about defence or foreign affairs. They’re focused on the issues that affect their families and their communities on a day-to-day basis.”

Mr Parkin, who said Pay the Rent has “nothing to do with the voice”, acknowledged that polls were tightening: “I think that’s reflective of the nature of the debate so far. We haven’t been able to have the debate with the community as much as we’d like to. We’ve started putting that in process.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/yes-campaign-distances-itself-from-thomas-mayo-comments/news-story/0388b2d59bd36e3465e1c056e390bc91

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044044

File: 96dae3a43eac1b0⋯.jpg (67.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

PM’s belief the voice will prevail now under challenge as no vote grows organically

SIMON BENSON - JUNE 21, 2023

Anthony Albanese’s belief that Labor’s unassailable clout will be enough to push through a contested referendum is now being directly challenged by the reality of what the Prime Minister hopes to achieve.

The strategy of being economical with detail over a significant alteration to the constitution is slowly killing the yes camp’s ability to present a unified message.

There is no dispute that the final week of parliament before the winter break has been a politically damaging one for both the government and the voice campaign. It has been divisive, evasive and confused.

Independent Kylea Tink on Wednesday suggested that people needed to stop looking to the “circus” of Canberra” to get informed on the debate.

“It‘s the worst of party politics in Canberra. I’m much more concerned for the conversations people are having on the ground,” she told Sky News.

“…you‘re not going to find that information if you’re just watching us down in Parliament House, and watching the circus that is question time.”

Tink is right, to a point.

There is information accessible to anyone seeking it. And this is the problem.

Fundamental and legitimate questions remain over the voice’s function and structure.

Arguments over how broad the remit of the voice may or may not be remain largely unanswered to any degree of satisfaction in the minds of many. Assurances by the Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney that the voice would not be bothered with culture wars has been disputed by yes campaign officials.

This is leading to an inevitable shift, allowing the no case to start taking on a life of its own and spreading organically through the community.

Concerns about the referendum have been reflected in polling and is evidenced in the online reach of the no-campaign, much of it which is unpaid.

The reach of the No campaign appears already to be deeper and broader in the community. And it is happening naturally without too much effort.

This is now the primary challenge for advocates of the voice.

While the yes camp has significantly superior financial backing it must now rely on advertising to run over the top of this spontaneous movement and persuade people to support its cause.

This will be difficult if the explicit strategy is to try and deprive people of detailed information and base an appeal dominated by emotion.

Several senior Labor figures are privately concerned about where the campaign is headed after this week.

And not all necessarily share Anthony Albanese’s stated confidence of a positive outcome.

The risk is that voters may start to question whether there is something they are not being told. If such an impression is allowed to take root, it will be difficult to untangle.

The lesson being quickly learned is that you can have the best of advocates combined with a strong sales pitch, grander platform and significantly deeper pockets, but unless the product is trusted, it won’t work.

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has admitted that there may be a need for a change of strategy.

But it is almost too late for this.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/pms-belief-the-voice-will-prevail-now-under-challenge-as-no-vote-grows-organically/news-story/e5f1b43872904dd8644168cc1ec2dbbc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044059

File: 2f8833af0e1ee60⋯.jpg (94.9 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_is_likely….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Indigenous voice to parliament referendum date likely to be October 14

DENNIS SHANAHAN - JUNE 21, 2023

Anthony Albanese has said enough for us to sensibly conclude the date for a referendum to enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament will be announced in the first week of August, have about a 12-week campaign and be held on October 14.

On Tuesday, the Prime Minister repeated and refined the period it would take for a campaign and when the referendum vote would be held based on the constitutional requirements for such a poll.

Further defining his remarks on Monday when the referendum bill passed parliament that the vote would be in “the final quarter”, Albanese said on Tuesday: “It’ll be sometime between October and December.”

Recognising the electoral laws after Monday’s passage, he said: “It can’t be before two months and 33 days; there’s some technical things to do with the referendum.”

Given the poll has to be held on a Saturday, like a general election, that would make a vote possible from September 9 and include September 16 and September 23.

But given the October-December qualification and the extra declaration that the vote won’t “mess with the footy” and be held on the day of the AFL Grand final (September 30), the four possible Saturdays of September are ruled out.

Besides, Albanese will be travelling to at least Indonesia and India for the East Asia Summit and the G20 during that time.

At the other end of the year, all of the barely possible Saturdays in December – 2, 9 and 16 (there won’t be a poll the day before Christmas Eve or New Year’s Eve) – are out of the question because modern electioneering avoids a December poll and that would mean a campaign of more than four months.

November has similar problems as December with the length of the campaign and the PM’s travel commitments to the Pacific Island Forum in the Cook Islands and APEC in San Francisco around November 4 and 11 as well as yet-to-be scheduled trips to Washington DC and China.

Which leaves Saturdays in October, with October 21 and 28 falling during parliamentary sitting weeks and only the first two weeks – October 7 and 14 – falling in the spring break, giving them the top priority in October with the second Saturday in the month the obvious conclusion.

As for the date, you’d think Albanese will announce it at the Garma festival on August 4 or 5 because that is where he announced the wording of the referendum.

Best bets: the referendum date of October 14 will be announced in the first week of August to avoid colliding with football finals, overseas travel and parliamentary sittings.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-date-likely-to-be-october-14/news-story/a1d37e4557f9b3f7a27cdde368f830b6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044075

File: fd0db2b101fb44a⋯.jpg (70.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,DPP_Shane_Drumgold_wanted_….jpg)

File: d74f9a29a74066d⋯.jpg (88.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_while_evide….jpg)

File: db304a9b6d200ca⋯.jpg (136.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_her_p….jpg)

File: abc3093d481fd2d⋯.jpg (134.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_told_the_bo….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

DPP Shane Drumgold wanted ACT Police mistake in Brittany Higgins matter publicly exposed

KRISTIN SHORTEN - JUNE 21, 2023

ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold has ­extended his leave as new documents reveal the depths of his frustration with police ­investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation.

Following five days of bruising examination at the board of ­inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system last month, where Mr Drumgold was grilled over his handling of the rape claim and the accused Bruce Lehrmann’s discontinued prosecution, the ACT’s top prosecutor suddenly went on four weeks’ leave.

The 58-year-old was due to ­return to his role on June 13 but a spokesman for Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury on Wednesday told The Australian that Mr Drumgold had requested to ­extend his leave to June 30.

His office said they expected him back on July 3.

Until then, Deputy DPP ­Anthony Williamson SC will continue to as acting director.

Mr Drumgold had also been expected to resume giving evidence at the inquiry but a representative for the board said that no further public hearings were planned.

This comes after Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates’s file notes, submitted to the inquiry, revealed Mr Drumgold wanted to publicly shame police for inadvertently providing Ms Higgins’ counselling notes to Mr Lehrmann’s lawyer.

During a meeting on September 22, 2021, Mr Drumgold told Ms Yates that while he didn’t want the jury at Mr Lehrmann’s impending rape trial to suspect the detectives were incompetent, their mistake “needs to explode at some point”.

In her notes, Ms Yates ­recorded Mr Drumgold as saying at the meeting that he “wants to preserve prospects of conviction” ahead of Mr Lehrmann’s trial.

“Would be undesirable to have the incompetence of the investigators as a question hovering (over the trial),” she noted of his remarks. “Competence of investigation is directly linked to prospects of conviction. Incompetent investigations cause jury’s to ask – what other stuff ups did they make? But this also needs to ­explode at some point.”

Someone at the meeting said the disclosure demonstrated “catastrophic, mind-boggling incompetence” although it is not clear from Ms Yates’s notes exactly who said this.

A couple of days later, Ms Yates made a file note of a conversation with Ms Higgins about the disclosure of the counselling notes. “Shane is outraged on your behalf,” Ms Yates told the former Liberal staffer.

“His priority has been to ensure the documents are destroyed or returned. He’s confident it won’t affect the trial, or impact the prospects of conviction.”

Following this there was a ­flurry of calls, texts and emails ­between Ms Yates, Ms Higgins and her partner David Sharaz but they have all been redacted.

During his evidence to the ­inquiry Mr Drumgold told the board’s chair Walter Sofronoff KC that following police’s inadvertent disclosure of Ms Higgins’ counselling notes, he read them himself to assess the damage.

Ms Yates’ statement to the ­inquiry also reveals Mr Drumgold told her – five weeks before Mr Lehrmann was charged – that if police did not hurry up and charge the accused with Ms Higgins’ ­alleged rape, he could circumvent them to lay the charge himself.

Ms Higgins alleged Mr Lehrmann raped her in senator Linda Reynolds’ ministerial office in the early hours of March 23, 2019, after a night out drinking with colleagues in Canberra.

In her statement to the inquiry, Ms Yates said that Mr Drumgold requested a catch-up with her on June 30, 2021, and expressed his frustration at ACT Police’s handling of the investigation. She said she was not sure what he wanted to discuss at the catch-up.

“Mr Drumgold expressed ­frustration to me about delays in the progress of the investigation,” Ms Yates said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/dpp-shane-drumgold-wanted-act-police-mistake-in-brittany-higgins-matter-publicly-exposed/news-story/ab78a96390da958e4590b865c73eeec4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044115

File: 5331d60699994ae⋯.jpg (2.43 MB,6048x4024,756:503,Penpa_Tsering_Tibet_s_pres….jpg)

>>18955315

‘China is our best publicity agent’: Tibet urges tougher line on Beijing

Matthew Knott - June 19, 2023

1/2

Tibet’s exiled political leader says it is unfair for Australia to punish nations such as Iran and Russia for human rights abuses while letting China off the hook because it is Australia’s biggest trading partner.

In his first trip to Australia since being elected the head of Tibet’s government-in-exile in 2021, Penpa Tsering urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to raise human rights with Chinese President Xi Jinping if he travels to Beijing later this year and to impose sanctions on Chinese officials for the mistreatment of ethnic minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang.

Tsering accused Chinese President Xi Jinping of seeking to annihilate ethnic and religious minorities in his nation, comparing the forced separation of Tibetan children from their families to Australia’s treatment of Indigenous children during the stolen generations era.

Tsering will address the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday, defying efforts by Chinese officials in Australia to have the event cancelled on the grounds it would undermine China’s “core interests”.

“I always thank the Chinese government for being our best publicity agent,” Tsering said in an interview.

“Even if we hired somebody, even if we had the money to hire somebody, they would not be able to do the kind of job that the Chinese government is doing for us.”

Tsering called for Australia to apply a consistent standard when it comes to punishing foreign governments for human rights abuses.

The Albanese government has imposed Magnitsky sanctions on officials from Russia, Iran and Myanmar in the past year but has resisted calls from human rights groups to do the same for China.

“When it comes to China, there are no sanctions, but when it comes to other countries where you feel you can handle it then you impose sanctions,” Tsering said.

“That is not fair. If there is a policy of the government it should be applied to all countries in the same manner.”

Magnitsky sanctions allow the government to revoke visas, ban travel and seize property from individuals who might try to hide assets in Australia.

Tsering called for Albanese to be forthright about human rights violations if he accepts an invitation to visit Beijing later this year.

“Australia is a middle power that is known for its strength to influence policies; it can deal with the bigger powers, it can deal with the smaller powers,” he said.

“We’re not saying don’t engage with China. You have to engage but do it in a strategic way.”

Tsering said China was responsible for “crimes against humanity” in Tibet and Xinjiang, provinces where Buddhism and Islam are the predominant religions respectively.

Three United Nations experts warned in February that around 1 million Tibetan children have been separated from their families and placed into Chinese state-run boarding schools as part of efforts to absorb them into the dominant Han Chinese culture.

“In Australia, you had the stolen generations from 1910 to 1970, and China has adopted a similar policy in Tibet,” he said.

“All these issues added together are contributing to the slow termination or annihilation of the Tibetan culture, religion and Tibetan language.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044123

File: c11078bcc83bbb5⋯.jpg (4.87 MB,7500x5000,3:2,Penpa_Tsering_s_National_P….jpg)

>>19044115

2/2

Tsering said the Chinese government falsely claimed Tibet’s government-in-exile wishes to create a separate nation when it was only arguing for greater autonomy within the Chinese state.

“Some countries think that if you support Tibet then you are against China which is not the case because we are not asking for independence,” he said.

Tsering will meet opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham and MPs from the parliamentary friends of Tibet group while in Canberra, but has not secured a meeting with Foreign Minister Penny Wong.

Wong met with representatives from the Tibetan community on the weekend ahead of Tsering’s visit.

A spokeswoman for Wong said the foreign minister “has raised Australia’s concerns about the erosion of rights and freedoms in Tibet in every meeting with her Chinese counterpart and will continue to do so”.

“Australia uses every strategy at its disposal towards upholding human rights, consistent with our values and with our interests.”

Labor MP Susan Templeman, who has a significant Tibetan community in her Sydney electorate of Macquarie, said she believed Australia was better off raising the plight of Tibetans in international forums rather than through sanctions on China.

In a letter handed to National Press Club chief executive Maurice Reilly earlier this month, the Chinese embassy said: “It is a fact acknowledged by unbiased people that the human rights situation in Xizang [Tibet] is at its best in history”.

Tsering responded by calling for the Chinese government to remove restrictions on foreign journalists visiting Tibet.

“If Tibet is a socialist paradise then why don’t you allow other people to see the paradise for themselves?” he asked.

A spokesman for the Chinese embassy did not respond to requests for comment.

Tsering acknowledged the Dalai Lama’s international image had taken a hit in April when the spiritual leader kissed a young boy on the lips and asked him to “suck his tongue”, but said the incident had turned out to be a “blessing in disguise” for the Tibetan cause.

“The Chinese government thought that Tibetans, by seeing these pictures, might lose their trust or respect for His Holiness,” he said.

“We were able to watch His Holiness without censorship and in that sense, Chinese efforts are making us more united.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/china-is-our-best-publicity-agent-tibet-urges-tougher-line-on-beijing-20230619-p5dhld.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044128

File: a1aead87a233e04⋯.jpg (74.27 KB,1200x675,16:9,Leader_in_exile_Penpa_Tser….jpg)

>>18955315

>>19044115

'Stolen generation': Tibet's fight to preserve culture

William Ton - June 21, 2023

George Orwell's 1984 has become a reality in Tibet as the Chinese government aims to eradicate culture's identity through processes reminiscent of Australia's stolen generation, Tibet's leader-in-exile says.

Tibet's exiled president Penpa Tsering said the situation in the region has deteriorated to a point comparable to South Sudan and Syria, accusing the Chinese regime of "striking the very identity of Tibetan people" in a bid to erase the culture.

"If anyone has read George Orwell's 1984, that has come into reality in China and more so in the Tibetan region," Mr Tsering told the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday.

He told of the dire conditions living as a Tibetan under Chinese rule where the flow of information and free movement has been limited, with constant surveillance by authorities.

"That's what China tries to do - lock away Tibet. Make it like a huge prison where nobody can go in, nobody can go out and then tell the international community that Tibet is a socialist paradise," he said.

The regime has cracked down on all points of Tibetan culture with restrictions extending to its main religion of Buddhism where CCTV has been placed in all monasteries to surveil the movements of monks and nuns.

Tibetans living in the region have had artificial intelligence deployed to control them including electronic identification, geolocation or the collection of DNA for profiling.

"This is aimed at complete eradication of the identity of the nationalities so that everything becomes Chinese," the president said.

Details of Tibetan children being removed from families and put into "colonial-style" boarding schools hark back to Australia's own stolen generation.

When pointed out to Chinese officials, Mr Tsering said they deflected to the past wrongs of other countries including the US and Australia.

"China knows these governments have done wrong … The Chinese government is knowingly, deliberately, doing this to the Tibetans."

And with news that China plans to close down Tibetan classes in the Golong region from 2024 and potentially expanding that to the entire region, Mr Tsering says there will be serious consequences on Tibetans being able to maintain their identity.

"When the whole world is moving towards multiculturalism, China wants to move towards one culture, one nation, one language, so they impose the use of Mandarin."

Mr Tsering called on the Albanese government to be consistent with its laws and impose Magnitsky-style sanctions on those responsible for the human rights abuses.

"The Australian government has sanctioned Iran, Burma, Russia but when it comes to China, then everybody closes down a little bit," the president said.

"If it is a foreign policy, then it has to be equal for everybody."

However, the leader-in-exile isn't asking to completely break from China, instead advocating for the "Middle Way approach" initiated by the Dalai Lama, where Tibetans would live with more autonomy but still under China's government.

"We are not asking for independence," he said.

"It's not a matter of who rules. It is the quality of the rule."

https://www.perthnow.com.au/politics/stolen-generation-tibets-fight-to-preserve-culture-c-11048157

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044137

File: a5bbad470734bf0⋯.jpg (90.01 KB,1024x576,16:9,Foreign_Minister_Penny_Won….jpg)

File: 9ffa298a96535de⋯.jpg (112.92 KB,1021x681,1021:681,The_opposition_s_foreign_a….jpg)

>>18949906

>>18960257

>>19016940

‘A real head-scratcher’: Australia’s commitment to Ukraine questioned

Latika Bourke - June 21, 2023

London: The Australian government has been criticised for failing to send a minister to represent the nation at the Ukraine recovery conference taking place in London on Wednesday.

The conference is jointly hosted by the Ukrainian government and the UK, which has been one of Ukraine’s strongest supporters, with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak mobilising an international coalition to deliver Ukraine fighter jets to help defeat Russian invaders.

It will gather heads of state, foreign ministers, a swathe of Ukrainian government officials, non-government organisations and private sector leaders, including Australia’s richest man Andrew Forrest.

Among those attempting to galvanise monetary support and investment for Ukraine will be the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and Japan’s Foreign Minister Hayashi Yoshimasa. Blinken said he would be announcing new US assistance for Ukraine on Wednesday and praised the more than 50 countries attending the conference.

The UK’s foreign secretary James Cleverly praised Blinken’s attendance: “The fact that the US Secretary of State is here and he found the time in his unbelievably busy schedule I think reflects the fact that the world views the UK as a good place to come together to discuss these complicated issues.”

But Foreign Minister Penny Wong will skip the conference, instead opting to attend parliament and send a pre-recorded video message.

A spokeswoman for the minister said: “Due to commitments in parliament, the foreign minister couldn’t attend but pre-recorded a statement for the conference and will be represented by Australia’s High Commissioner to the UK Stephen Smith”.

A spokesman from the Australian High Commission to the UK confirmed Smith will attend the conference as Australia’s head of delegation.

King Charles III received dignitaries at St James Palace ahead of the gathering, which is aimed at galvanising support for Ukraine’s post-war recovery.

Smith was not included on the guest list because the King only received ministers and VIPs sent by other attending countries.

The opposition’s spokesman for foreign affairs Simon Birmingham said Labor’s commitment to Ukraine was in question.

“The Albanese government continues to send all of the wrong signals about Australia’s commitment to Ukraine,” Birmingham said.

“It’s staggering that the Albanese government is a repeated ministerial no-show at important discussions about Ukraine’s future.

“It’s time for Labor to put time and resources behind the rhetoric of defending the rules-based order by delivering a new and comprehensive package of support for Ukraine, while prioritising Australian participation in discussions with our key democratic partners.”

Michael Bociurkiw, global affairs analyst and senior fellow at the Atlantic Council said Australia’s decision to skip the conference was a “real head-scratcher”.

“While the most important thing is for Australia to continue providing military assistance to Ukraine, its absence from such a major event risks sending the wrong signal to Kyiv and other allies.

“It’s a real head scratcher of a decision. Even more so considering that Canberra hasn’t reopened its embassy in Kyiv.”

Australia has not yet reopened its diplomatic presence in Kyiv, despite a direct plea from Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky on the first anniversary of the invasion of his country.

Australia’s ambassador to Ukraine, Bruce Edwards, is operating from Warsaw, Poland, despite urging the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to return to the embassy in Kyiv.

Allies including the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States have all restored their diplomatic posts.

Anthony Albanese was forced into agreeing to attend the upcoming NATO summit in Lithuania, after a backlash to his initial decision to skip the summit, despite an exclusive invitation being extended to just four non-NATO countries.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/a-real-head-scratcher-australia-s-commitment-to-ukraine-questioned-20230620-p5di4a.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044142

File: 21457756b986192⋯.jpg (116.7 KB,1280x720,16:9,Barry_Cable_will_be_booted….jpg)

>>19016533

North Melbourne premiership great Barry Cable will be removed from the Australian Football Hall of Fame

The AFL Commission is set to make the unprecedented decision to remove Barry Cable from the Australian Football Hall of Fame in the wake of his historical sexual abuse ruling.

Mark Robinson - June 20, 2023

Barry Cable will be stripped of his legend status and be booted from the Hall of Fame in the wake of the historical sexual abuses he was found to have committed.

The unprecedented decision will be set in motion after next Tuesday’s Australian Football Hall of Fame dinner.

Preceding the dinner, the AFL Commission will meet and among the agenda items will be Cable’s eligibility.

Afterwards, the commission is certain to officially write to Cable and inform him he will be stripped of football’s highest honour.

It’s understood friends of Cable have urged him to resign before the official commission decision.

Cable, 79, is one of the sport’s most decorated players, having played 379 senior games for Perth, North Melbourne and East Perth.

He was awarded legend status in 2012.

Cable last week was found to have sexually abused a Perth girl for five years from the age of 12, starting at or around 1970.

Four other women also gave evidence during the civil trial that Cable sexually abused them as teenage girls.

On the day of the court ruling, the AFL Commission approved a rule change which would allow the Australian football Hall of Fame to suspend or revoke membership of the game’s greats.

AFL spokesman Jay Allen said on Tuesday: “The AFL has recently updated its Hall of Fame Charter and from June 27 (when it takes effect) the AFL commission it will consider its course of action regarding this matter”.

That ruling was made so the commission could act decisively on Cable.

Western Australian judge Mark Herron ruled on Friday in favour of the woman, awarding her $818,700 in damages.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/news/north-melbourne-premiership-great-barry-cable-will-be-removed-from-the-afl-hall-of-fame/news-story/b7a5bfa8c220e63e91ef49d6255c3df5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044166

File: d600ce8792eafdd⋯.jpg (309.98 KB,1862x1046,931:523,Donald_Trump_Jr_is_launchi….jpg)

File: 2cf248218f53916⋯.jpg (169.13 KB,1862x1046,931:523,People_calling_to_ban_Trum….jpg)

File: 4575393c5f40a6c⋯.jpg (149.08 KB,1862x1046,931:523,Former_Brexit_Party_leader….jpg)

File: 69c92883a166db2⋯.jpg (724.88 KB,1158x2216,579:1108,change_org_Stop_Donald_Tru….jpg)

File: 2f55b2d3692d8ee⋯.jpg (1.22 MB,1158x2181,386:727,Facebook_Fight_the_Alt_Rig….jpg)

>>18860803 (pb)

>>18965978

>>19037159

Left-wing activists try to ban Trump Jr. from Australia ahead of speaking tour

Petition to keep Trump Jr. from getting a visa to Australia has more than 17,000 signatures

Elizabeth Elkind - June 20, 2023

Left-wing activists are pushing to derail Donald Trump Jr.’s planned speaking tour in Australia, and a petition to deny him a visa into the country has netted more than 17,000 signatures.

Former President Trump’s eldest son is launching a three-city speaking tour of Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne from July 9-11 that’s being held by Turning Point Australia, a sister organization of the American conservative group founded by Charlie Kirk.

A Change.org page was launched in response calling for Trump Jr. to be blocked from even setting foot in Australia, which as of Tuesday morning has just over 17,200 supporters.

"Donald Trump Jr is an illegal drug-taking bigoted person who should not be allowed to enter Australia for the purpose of earning himself and possibly his father any ‘Campaign Contributions’. Ban him from this country," wrote Kris Eriksen, the petition’s founder.

One signatory commented, "The Trumps have no place in Australia," while another argued that the Trumps are anti-transgender.

"I have a Transgender son, not only am I sick to death of the right wing ideology I also quite frankly fear for my child’s life," the second person wrote.

If Trump Jr. isn't banned, the Campaign Against Racism and Fascism is planning to protest his appearance in Melbourne. More than 260 people have indicated interest in going, according to a corresponding Facebook page.

"Trump Jr is carrying on his father's project of whipping up an anti-migrant and anti-trans far right movement. Trump Jr is an aggressive campaigner against 'woke gender ideology' and 'cultural marxism'. His goal is to build a far right movement that attacks the rights of women, migrants and the LGBT community," the Campaign Against Racism and Fascism wrote.

"He was also involved in the antidemocratic attempt to keep Trump as President back in 2020, and is even more fascistic than his despicable father," the group said.

The group clarified on its event page, however, that it did not support travel bans out of principle.

Trump Jr. is expected to be joined by former Brexit Party Leader Nigel Farage.

The Trump Organization did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the opposition to Trump Jr.’s speaking tour.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/left-wing-activists-ban-trump-jr-australia-speaking-tour

https://www.change.org/p/stop-donald-trump-jr-getting-an-australian-visa

https://www.facebook.com/events/570429005165677/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044192

File: 61720314d5b5b0b⋯.jpg (84.8 KB,800x600,4:3,The_USS_America_docked_in_….jpg)

>>18946058

>>19037218

Amphibious assault ship ready for Talisman Sabre drills

Rex Martinich - June 20 2023

The commander of a US Navy amphibious assault ship says he is "prepared" for attempts by other nations to seize maritime territory in the region.

The USS America docked in the Port of Brisbane on Tuesday for a three-day visit ahead of the Talisman Sabre training exercise in northern Australia involving land combat, amphibious landings and air operations.

The $A5 billion, 257-metre warship is crewed by 2000 sailors and marines and carries 20 aircraft including six F-35B Lightning II joint strike fighters with vertical take-off and landing capability.

Neither the highest-ranking officers aboard the warship, US Navy Captain Shockey Snyder or Marine Corps Colonel Matthew Danner, would mention China by name during a press conference on the flight deck.

"This deployment is a routine deployment for America, it is not meant to send any message to any particular country," Capt Synder said.

Standing in front of an insignia with the ship's Latin motto, "Bello vel pace paratus" or "Ready for war or peace", Capt Synder did say his ship and Col Danner's 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit were trained for any crisis, from a humanitarian crisis to a combat engagement.

"Any country out there that has excessive maritime claims, that is not in accordance with international law, we would be prepared to conduct any tasking in response to that," Capt Synder said.

The USS America is usually based in Japan and is designed to support F-35B fighters with its huge internal fuel tanks and maintenance bays, and to deploy marines via Osprey tilt-rotor transport aircraft and King Stallion helicopters.

Below decks, marines from Ghost Battalion - which fought its first battle against Japan in the Solomon Islands during World War II - showed off their weaponry including sniper rifles, machine guns and an M3A1 rocket launcher that can fire either smoke bombs or anti-tank warheads.

Col Danner said the Marine Corps had not noticed increased tensions and did not hope for combat but was ready for it at any time and not just in one region of the world.

"We embrace our history, we put a lot of effort into making sure the marines understand it but our specific training or our mindset is not tailored toward any given adversary," Col Danner said.

After visiting Brisbane and Townsville, the USS America will join the 14-day Talisman Sabre exercise along with about 30,000 other military personnel from the US, Australian Defence Force and allied nations in the Pacific and Europe.

"We have a long history of partnerships with the people of Australia, we do a lot of military-to-military exercises and training with one of our closest allies here in Australia," Capt Synder said.

https://www.maitlandmercury.com.au/story/8241463/amphibious-assault-ship-ready-for-talisman-sabre-drills/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044210

File: aa47b7583ce8295⋯.jpg (317.57 KB,2048x1152,16:9,An_F_35B_Lightning_II_Join….jpg)

File: a8f0cca1427abcd⋯.jpg (454.05 KB,2048x1536,4:3,F35B_Joint_strike_fighter_….jpg)

File: 1e83f1fde428194⋯.jpg (267.77 KB,1728x972,16:9,Part_of_the_flight_deck_of….jpg)

File: d84ae9f12611307⋯.jpg (346.83 KB,1728x1296,4:3,Overlooking_the_flight_dec….jpg)

>>18946058

>>19037218

US sailors and Marines flock ashore as mega war ship USS America docks in Brisbane

The massive 257m-long USS America has docked in Brisbane with the crew set to flood ashore. Here’s what’s high on their must-do list.

Jodie Munro O'Brien - June 20, 2023

1/2

Seeing koalas and kangaroos are high on the agenda for most of the crew of the USS America which arrived in Brisbane this week.

The largest amphibious assault ship in the US Navy's Seventh Fleet docked to allow its 2500 embarked US Marines and sailors to enjoy a port visit before participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023, Australia’s largest bilateral combined military training activity with the US.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044216

File: 4f7e623ea3a5a4a⋯.jpg (324.13 KB,2047x1536,2047:1536,A_sailor_on_board_the_USS_….jpg)

File: ac1899b82f0d3bb⋯.jpg (489.27 KB,2048x1536,4:3,One_of_the_flight_deck_cre….jpg)

File: 2bd59367fd9369b⋯.jpg (234.41 KB,2048x1536,4:3,An_MV_22_Osprey_flying_ove….jpg)

File: 77fc42d411086ed⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,2048x1536,4:3,F35_B_Joint_strike_fighter….jpg)

>>19044210

2/2

The 257m-long ship is designed to accommodate F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters and a combination of rescue, combat and support helicopters including MV22 Ospreys and CH-53E Super Stallions.

US Marine Captain Erik Carlson, an F-35 pilot, said the Americans loved working with the Australian military.

“We work with the Australians a lot and we love that relationship,” he said.

“It’s good to have close friends down here.”

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/what-life-is-like-onboard-mega-uss-america/news-story/075cf1a31f045588959290831612eb5f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044241

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18946058

>>19037218

American navy ship USS America arrives in Brisbane

7NEWS Australia

Jun 20, 2023

Brisbane is about to be invaded by a large military force ready to take on the town.

The massive navy vessel USS America is in Australia for vital training exercises, but first, its crew is coming ashore.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuSLZFu9mGo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19044256

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18946058

>>19037218

Why this American warship has just docked in Brisbane

ABC News (Australia)

Jun 20, 2023

Queensland has thrown out the welcome mat to 2,000 US marines and navy sailors ready to explore Brisbane. The USS America is the largest amphibious warship in the US Navy's 7th fleet. It has sailed in for a port call before heading north to participate in the military exercise Talisman Sabre.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MruBqM4HK4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19050994

File: c0225ae078b35ff⋯.jpg (150.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

>>19043992

Anthony Albanese seeks to place legal limits on Aboriginal voice amid debate over Australia Day

ROSIE LEWIS and JESS MALCOLM - JUNE 22, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese is seeking to place legal limits on the scope of the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government by assuring Australians its remit would be restricted to issues that “specifically or differently” affect Aboriginal people.

The Coalition accused the government of “desperately trying to retrofit its narrative” as the Prime Minister attempted to turn the political attack on the opposition, amid a divisive debate over ­whether the voice could advise on changing Australia Day.

With falling support for the voice in the polls and confusion around how it will work and what it will advise on, Mr Albanese said Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus’s second reading speech on the government’s Constitution Alteration Bill would have “legal ­consequences” for any High Court interpretation of what the voice can advise on.

“I urge people to look at the words that are being put forward that make it clear the primacy of the parliament,” the Prime Minister said.

“I urge people to have a look at the second reading speech of the Attorney-General that has legal consequences, speaking about matters that affect Indigenous Australians differently.

“And I urge people as well, those opposite, to listen to the words of the person that this ­Leader of the Opposition ­appointed as shadow attorney-general (Julian Leeser): the voice is advisory. It won’t be Moses handing down the tablets from the mountain. The parliament will still be the democratic centre of our ­national life. The parliament will still be supreme in matters of policy and law.

“I say to all Australians, parliaments pass laws but it’s people that make history and we have an ­opportunity to advance reconciliation in the last quarter of this year. I sincerely hope and call for Australians to vote Yes.”

If a legal case is brought against the voice, the High Court may consider materials such as the Constitution Alteration Bill’s ­explanatory memorandum or Mr Dreyfus’s second reading speech, as well as the parliamentary ­debate and various opinions on the proposed amendment.

In March, when introducing the Constitutional Alteration Bill to parliament, which outlines the government’s referendum question and constitutional amendment establishing the voice, Mr Dreyfus provided more detail on the matters on which the advisory body could make representations to parliament and executive government.

“‘Matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ would include: matters specific to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples; and matters relevant to the Australian community, including general laws or measures, but which affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander peoples differently to other members of the Australian community,” Mr Dreyfus said.

The law on its own – passed by parliament this week – says only that the voice may make representations on “matters relating to ­Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander peoples”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19050998

File: 03f1b6c666fb8a3⋯.jpg (103.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Attorney_General_Mark_Drey….jpg)

>>19050994

2/2

Constitutional law experts said the voice’s scope could not be ­restricted to matters that directly or differently affected Aboriginal people and it could in fact advise on a broader range of topics.

University of Sydney constitutional law expert Anne Twomey said the Prime Minister was correct to say the High Court could take into account Mr Dreyfus’s speech, but it was impossible to say definitively how the court would interpret the wording.

“It will look at the second reading speech but it’s not conclusive,” Professor Twomey said. “It will go beyond that. The fact that it has the word ‘include’, it does include those two phrases (specific and differently) but it is possible it could mean something further.

“In the second reading speech, when the Attorney-General ­described what would make up matters relating to Aboriginal people he did so in an inclusive way, but he didn’t exclude the possibility of other things falling in that category. So the High Court would take into account that word ‘include’.”

University of NSW constitutional law expert George Williams said the second reading speech was unlikely to limit the scope of the voice, noting it would ultimately be up to the High Court to interpret the wording.

Both Professors Williams and Twomey said the broad scope of the voice would make High Court challenges less likely.

“It is much better to be broad than end up with legalistic distinctions,” Professor Williams said. “It is a political body, it is only advisory and it has a broad remit to make decisions."

Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said any suggestion the High Court would be constrained by a second reading speech was “highly optimistic”.

“Extraneous materials can only provide guidance if the meaning of the words on the ­statute are unclear,” Senator Cash said.

“The words set out in the legislation that will be inserted into our Constitution are very clear.

“The Albanese government is desperately trying to retrofit its narrative as they realise Australians are working out what is being foisted upon them – a risky, unknown, divisive and permanent body that will do nothing to improve the lives of Indigenous Australians.

“This shows why Mr Albanese should release the three secret pieces of legal advice provided to the government by the Australian Government Solicitor rather than the single piece they have released, purely for public consumption.”

In parliament, Mr Albanese accused Peter Dutton of using the same playbook on the Indigenous voice to parliament as he did before Kevin Rudd’s apology to the Stolen Generations.

After being asked by his own side in question time why it was important people avoided false campaigns designed to create fear on the voice, the Prime Minister quoted Mr Dutton from 2008: “In January 2008, the Leader of the Opposition said this: ‘I think the Australian people deserve to know the full details of the implications of this policy, including the financial ones. It would beggar belief that they’ll be contemplating an apology that could open the government up to serious damages claims without knowing what those claims would be.”

Mr Albanese said those comments were “nonsense then” and they were “nonsense now”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-seeks-to-place-legal-limits-on-aboriginal-voice-amid-debate-over-australia-day/news-story/513a92147882d5693dbccb6efba89875

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051005

File: 7be4db51b22d8fa⋯.jpg (91.37 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_says_Pete….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Anthony Albanese rejects Peter Dutton’s request to delay or change the referendum

ROSIE LEWIS -JUNE 22, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has rejected Peter Dutton’s “offer of friendship” to delay or change the referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament, ramping up a scathing personal attack against the Opposition Leader in a bid to counter accusations Australians are being starved of detail.

As the final parliamentary sitting week before the winter break came to a close, Mr Dutton declared Australians weren’t ready to vote on the voice because of a lack of detail.

He called for the Prime Minister to delay the referendum if he believed it was going to fail so reconciliation was not set back and used a matter of public importance to demand Mr Albanese recalibrate by working on a legislated advisory body and pursuing constitutional recognition separately, in a bid to unify the country.

The Yes campaign is banking on just four more sitting weeks between now and polling day, expected in October, after Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney faced days of intense parliamentary questioning over what the voice would and would not offer advice on.

“What we’re seeing at the moment is a government that deliberately is keeping information from the Australian public, hoping that because of their goodwill that you seek to exploit, and hoping because of the vibe of the thing that it will pass. This will be the most significant change to the way in which our government operates in our country’s history,” Mr Dutton said.

“The Prime Minister of the day has the option before him now to work with us to say to the Australian public that we will go forward in a unifying, not dividing, moment in October of this year. That is the hand of friendship that we extend to the government today.

“We propose to legislate the voice. Let’s do that. Let’s sit down and work together on the drafting of that and make sure that Australians can understand how it works, good and bad, but let them be informed. Don’t treat the Australian public with such contempt. That’s the duty of the Prime Minister of the day. And at the moment he’s sadly lacking his fundamental teaching to the Australian people.”

Mr Albanese rubbished the 10-minute speech, saying it was “totally devoid of empathy”, labelling it misinformation and accusing Mr Dutton of trying to stoke confusion and division.

He has said he was open to changes to the government’s chosen wording for the voice constitutional amendment while parliament was debating the provisions, but ultimately no formal submission was personally put to him by the Coalition – though the Liberal Party provided alternative options in a dissenting report.

“In 2017, Indigenous Australians met and agreed on the Uluru Statement from the heart. The Leader of the Opposition has just given a statement without a heart,” the Prime Minister said.

“The question that Australians will be asked at this referendum is clear. The exact wording of the constitutional provisions is clear. The eight design principles explaining what the voice will do and what it won’t do are clear. All of this information has been available, in some cases for many years, most of it developed when the former Coalition was in government.

“What’s just as clear is that those opposite, some, are not interested in answers. They were always set on saying no.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051010

File: 3165ebda3383593⋯.jpg (148.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Land_council_chairs_with_A….jpg)

>>19051005

2/2

Quoting Mr Dutton from 2008 ahead of Kevin Rudd’s apology to the Stolen Generations - when he said “Australians deserved to know the full details of the implications of this policy, including the financial ones” and warned of serious damages claims – the Prime Minister hit out at what he said was a similar “completely unworthy” scare campaign on the voice.

“The Leader of the Opposition didn’t just sit there and tell Brendan Nelson that he was opposed to it (the apology). He actually stood up and walked out,” Mr Albanese said.

That’s the Peter Dutton I know, that’s the Peter Dutton that Australians know. And we’re seeing it played out again.”

Mr Dutton said the government had been peddling a “legal nonsense” in parliament, after Mr Albanese sought to place legal limits on the scope of the voice and assured Australians its remit would be restricted to issues that “specifically or differently” affect Aboriginal people.

The Prime Minister doubled down on the argument on Thursday, after constitutional law experts said the voice’s scope could be broader.

The constitutional amendment says the voice may make representations to the parliament and the executive government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”. Mr Dreyfus’s speech says those matters can “include” issues that specifically or differently impact Indigenous Australians.

The four land council chiefs from the Northern Territory were in parliament on Thursday to present Mr Albanese with the 2023 Barunga declaration, which calls for “the recognition of our peoples in our still young Constitution by enshrining our voice to the parliament and executive government, never to be rendered silent with the stroke of a pen again”.

Ms Burney invoked former Labor prime minister Bob Hawke, saying Australians should grab the voice to parliament with both hands as she was asked if the government would follow the voice’s advice if it said Australia Day should be changed or abolished.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-rejects-peter-duttons-request-to-delay-or-change-the-referendum/news-story/c394ff8c120179490f8ae585087ff247

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051030

File: d2db2b2f913949b⋯.jpg (88.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: e577db35752eb52⋯.jpg (72.51 KB,768x1024,3:4,Barrister_Louise_Clegg.jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Anthony Albanese’s missed opportunity to modulate the voice

CHRIS MERRITT - JUNE 22, 2023

For almost a year, Anthony Albanese chose not to make the one change that could have handed him overwhelming support in the coming referendum.

The Prime Minister ignored repeated entreaties to change the scope of the proposed Indigenous voice so it would focus only on matters that affect Indigenous people – and them alone.

The fact that Albanese has now embraced this idea – or at least has given a public impression of embracing this view – shows that the government implicitly accepts its design for the voice is flawed.

But it was all for show. The reality is that this week’s talk in Canberra about imposing limits on the scope of the voice was of little consequence. It changes nothing.

Had the Prime Minister changed the words of his proposal before the referendum legislation was passed by parliament, things would have been very different.

He might have split the “no” vote and would now be cruising towards a successful outcome at the referendum.

But it is now too late.

It’s hard to avoid the impression that the government is merely attempting to change its sales pitch in order to paper over the fatal flaw at the heart of the voice: the threat to equality of citizenship.

This threat is based on the fact that the voice would give one group of citizens, based on their race, an additional say on all laws, all public policies and all administrative matters beyond that enjoyed by everyone else.

This is a central and unavoidable component of the scheme approved by parliament. It would create an institution motivated by racial preference that could have a say on everything – including Australia Day.

This jurisdictional overreach and threat to equality is now baked into the proposal that will go to the referendum.

It formed the main focus of a sold-out talk on Tuesday by barrister Louise Clegg in Sydney that was organised by the Samuel Griffith Society.

Clegg saw the debate over the voice as part of a broader malaise afflicting comparable countries.

“We in liberal democracies are in something of a rule of law crisis,” she said.

“Equality before the law is the central tenet of the rule of law. It sits at the apex, if you depict the rule of law as a pyramid.

“That idea is seriously under threat. This has come out of the academy and has extended to what I call apex elites.

“It is really only the elite of the elites who buy into this idea that equality before the law is no longer a good idea and we might, or could or should, in some circumstances have different laws and conventions for different ‘tribes’ or groups of people depending on gender, race, sex, the colour of their skin and other identity groups.

“This is a global phenomenon. Australia has not been spared.

“That explains why this amendment, which has been developed by a handful of apex elites, some of whom are my friends … overreaches and in a very clear way entrenches identity politics,” Clegg said.

Her remarks provide the real context for this week’s sham talk of reforming the voice. That horse has bolted.

It is now futile to pretend that if this referendum succeeds the new words in the Constitution could somehow be limited by the words of a speech by the Attorney-General, Mark Dreyfus.

Yet that is what the nation was subjected to this week.

Albanese told parliament: “I urge people to have a look at the second reading speech of the Attorney-General that has legal consequences, speaking about matters that affect Indigenous Australians differently.”

That speech does refer to giving the voice a say on general measures that affect Indigenous people differently, and on matters that specifically affect Indigenous people.

But these were not terms of limitation. Dreyfus cited them as examples of the sorts of issues that would be included in the jurisdiction of the voice.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051032

File: cc8bb5efd0bd926⋯.jpg (109.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Attorney_General_Mark_Drey….jpg)

>>19051030

2/2

When Albanese told parliament Dreyfus’s speech had “legal consequences” he neglected to outline the limited circumstances in which judges can legitimately refer to second-reading speeches.

This sort of “extrinsic” material is not of equivalent status to the plain words of a statute or a provision of the Constitution.

Judges can take account of this sort of material if a provision is ambiguous, obscure or its ordinary meaning would lead to absurd or unreasonable outcomes.

If the government had intended to focus the work of the voice on Indigenous affairs, or on matters that affect Indigenous people differently to the rest of the community, it could have done so when the referendum legislation was before parliament.

At its highest, Dreyfus’s speech reflects the intentions of the Attorney-General.

But the High Court is not concerned with the subjective intentions of politicians. It is concerned with the objective meaning of the Constitution.

The court made this clear in 1988 in a case known as Cole v Whitfield when it ruled that it was not legitimate to substitute the scope and effect of a constitutional provision with the scope and effect that was subjectively intended by the founding fathers.

The government had a chance to reform the voice and it failed to do so.

Instead, the unlimited scope of the proposed institution means one group of Australians, defined by race, would gain an additional method of influencing all public policies, all proposed laws and all administrative matters.

That makes the voice a threat to equality citizenship and the rule of law. And that is why it needs to be rejected. It is beyond redemption.

Chris Merritt is vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/anthony-albaneses-missed-opportunity-to-modulate-the-voice/news-story/b92acd183c8cd03ff8317961f0425127

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051042

File: ca94e134d49828c⋯.jpg (207.66 KB,1271x888,1271:888,Twitter_Australia_s_team_w….jpg)

File: f6d5521bbd699dd⋯.jpg (1.12 MB,4000x2510,400:251,Australia_issues_Elon_Musk….jpg)

File: a08c88c7ea49345⋯.jpg (1.44 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Julie_Inman_Grant_says_Twi….jpg)

Australia issues Elon Musk's Twitter with a 'please explain' notice over surge in online hate

Matthew Doran - 22 June 2023

Elon Musk's social media platform Twitter has been issued with a demand from Australian authorities for information on what it is doing to tackle online hate.

Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said about one-third of the complaints her agency received about online hate involved content on Twitter, noting a surge in harmful posts since the Tesla chief bought the platform last year.

Twitter has 28 days to comply with the "please explain" notice, or face fines of almost $700,000 for every day it misses the deadline.

Ms Inman Grant revealed she was particularly concerned about anti-Semitic content, and harmful posts directed at Indigenous Australians and members of the LGBTIQ+ community.

She cited research by the Centre for Countering Digital Hate suggesting Twitter was repeatedly failing to act on harmful content posted by Twitter Blue accounts, the platform's subscription service.

"Any long-time Twitter user has seen since Elon Musk took over the company in October of last year that their feed looks a lot different, looks a lot more toxic," she said.

"There have been a range of changes that have caused us great concerns about the current state of the platform.

"But the most important piece of evidence we have is that we have received more complaints about online hate on Twitter in the past 12 months than on any other platform, and we want to know how they're enforcing their own terms of service on the issue."

Ms Inman Grant said Mr Musk's decision to let more than 62,000 suspended or banned accounts be reinstated was fuelling the situation.

"These aren't just garden-variety Twitter account holders — we've got Andrew Tate back on there," she said.

"A leopard doesn't change its spots.

"The general amnesty that Musk announced in November is more akin to breaking serial offenders out of Twitter jail, and he did so in the name of free expression.

"But what we see every day is when targeted online abuse, particularly towards marginalised communities, is enabled and is not enforced, it actually suppresses freedom of expression."

The eSafety Commissioner has the power, under Australian law, to demand information about the internal policies and procedures of companies.

Ms Inman Grant argued the dramatic axing of staff at Twitter — reported to be from 8,000 down to about 1,500 — was clearly a factor in the deterioration of standards on the platform.

"You can't combat all of that toxicity and online hate if you eviscerate your trust and safety staff," she said.

"A lot of their content moderation teams have been outsourced. We're trying to find out how many of those they still have on board.

"This is part of the fundamental basic expectations we expect of companies — if you're a multi-million or billion-dollar company, you've got hundreds of millions of global users, [and] safety by design is still key."

Twitter does not appear to have a public media contact since Mr Musk took over the company.

The ABC attempted to contact Twitter using a previous media email address, and was met with an automated response containing the smiling poo emoji.

Earlier this year, the Office of the eSafety Commissioner issued similar notices to Twitter and other social media platforms for information about efforts to combat child sexual abuse material on their platforms.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-22/cph-e-safety-commissioner-compels-twitter-to-produce-documents/102505546

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051054

File: f22245e1796d5eb⋯.jpg (1.8 MB,4000x2666,2000:1333,There_has_been_a_sharp_inc….jpg)

>>19051042

Australia to Elon Musk: Explain how you’re dealing with hate on Twitter

Frances Vinall - June 22, 2023

1/2

MELBOURNE, Australia — Australia has ordered Twitter to explain what it is doing to tackle online hate, saying there had been a sharp increase in “toxicity and hate” since Elon Musk took over the company last year.

Twitter could be fined as much as $475,000 a day if it doesn’t comply, under an online safety law that Australia touted as world-first when it was introduced in 2021.

Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety commissioner and a former Twitter executive, said Thursday that she issued the notice after a “worrying surge of hate online” and specifically a sharp increase in reports of serious online abuse since Musk bought the company in October.

“Twitter appears to have dropped the ball on tackling hate,” Inman Grant said in a statement on Thursday. She worked at Twitter as director for public policy in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia between 2014 and 2016.

Twitter has 28 days to respond to the notice. The company responded to an emailed request for comment with a smiling poop emoji, its automatic response to media inquiries since the Musk takeover.

Inman Grant said a third of all complaints about online hate reported to the eSafety commission are now from Twitter, with the platform generating more complaints than any other over the past 12 months.

She singled out as particularly problematic Musk’s decision in November to reinstate tens of thousands of accounts that had been banned or suspended under previous leadership as a potential factor in increased hate speech.

The commission received reports that the reinstatement “emboldened extreme polarizers, peddlers of outrage and hate, including neo-Nazis both in Australia and overseas,” she said.

Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers told The Washington Post in January that he had been taken aback by vitriolic attacks on the platform ahead of a constitutional referendum planned for later this year on whether an elected advisory body to Parliament for Indigenous Australians should be established.

Australia instituted the Online Safety Act in 2021, requiring social media providers to take reasonable steps to ensure that users are able to use the service in a safe manner, including limiting cyber abuse. The government at the time called it a “world first.”

The commission’s move to issue the notice to Twitter was an encouraging sign that Australia was prepared to act against social media companies, after it had “talked a tough game” for several years, said Josh Roose, associate professor in political sociology at Deakin University in Melbourne.

“If you do business in Australia, you’re still subject to Australian legislation, particularly around hate speech, anti-discrimination, and so on,” he said.

Australia does not have a broad constitutional right to freedom of speech, as in the United States. It has more limits on speech than the United States, including stricter defamation laws and a racial discrimination act that makes it an offense to publicly offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate a person on the basis of their race.

Limitations on speech that discriminates on the basis of other categories, such as disability, gender or sexual identity, differ state by state.

“You can’t get online and abuse and harass people on the basis of these protected categories — much like you can’t do that in a workplace — and you can be prosecuted for hate speech,” Roose said.

Twitter was contravening Australian protections by allowing discriminatory language, he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051058

File: f7c19a8ef772c75⋯.jpg (1.61 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Australia_s_internet_safet….jpg)

>>19051054

2/2

Despite Musk’s bravado, there is precedent for the company complying with requests from specific countries. In May, it removed some tweets for domestic users ahead of an election in Turkey.

At the time, Musk tweeted, “The choice is have Twitter throttled in its entirety or limit access to some tweets.”

An analysis by Rest of World in April found that Twitter under Musk had fully complied with 83 percent of requests from governments, including requests to remove content, compared with 50 percent previously, while receiving about double the number of requests. The highest numbers were from Turkey, followed by Germany, which restricts hate speech.

Musk is the owner of Twitter but stepped aside as chief executive this month, appointing Linda Yaccarino to the role.

Australia has shown itself willing to take on social media giants in recent years.

In 2021, the government passed legislation forcing some social media companies to pay news organizations for content shared on their platforms. Facebook responded during negotiations by blocking all news links for Australian users — including health and vaccine information during the coronavirus pandemic — for about a week before it backed down.

In February, the Australian eSafety commission asked Twitter, TikTok, Google, YouTube, Twitch and Discord for information on how they are addressing child sexual exploitation and abuse, sexual extortion and the promotion of harmful content on their platforms.

It is now assessing the responses, it said.

Frances Vinall is a reporter and researcher for The Washington Post who is based in Melbourne, Australia.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/06/22/australia-elon-musk-twitter-hate/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051082

File: 4f0bdecefdf94a7⋯.jpg (115.74 KB,1090x810,109:81,Tom_Rogers_says_there_has_….jpg)

File: 1e825dc86a03a63⋯.jpg (367.13 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Social_media_was_a_breedin….jpg)

File: aeb205fdf398710⋯.jpg (670.71 KB,2371x1612,2371:1612,A_Dominion_Voting_system_t….jpg)

Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers reports rise in social media abuse, misinformation

Daryna Zadvirna - 22 June 2023

As Australia gears up for a referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, the national election watchdog has reported a rise in abuse from social media users spreading misinformation over its voting process.

Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers said the tone of online comments on its posts about recent elections and the upcoming referendum voting information has been "aggressive".

"It worries me greatly," Mr Rogers said.

"We're adapting our own social media footprint and the way in which we engage with individuals.

"There's no point going down a rabbit hole when you know that someone is deliberately trying to take you down."

Mr Rogers said threatening posts about individual staff members also surfaced online during the recent New South Wales election.

"Including specific threats to staff which we haven't seen previously," he said.

"Pictures of … temporary polling staff being put online with outrageous statements next to their photos, you know, 'My name is X and I'm a vote thief'."

Part of 'global trend'

The issue has developed in other parts of the world, according to AEC digital engagement director Evan Ekin-Smyth.

"This is probably a global trend with how the information environment has changed and is continuing to change," he said.

"How the information environment interacts with elections around the world [is changing] as well.

"I don't have to provide specific examples because I'm sure you're all aware of them.

"But we do see on our social media accounts, on very benign information, people coming back and suggesting some fault in the (AEC) process effectively without any evidence."

The US midterm elections saw several unsubstantiated claims in relation to the electoral process circulating online, implying that voting in certain states was being tampered with.

A rise in social media misinformation followed false claims made by former US President Donald Trump in relation to the voting process during the 2020 presidential election.

Mr Trump accused an electronic voting system widely used by authorities in the US of deleting or switching votes in an attempt to pin the blame for his loss to President Joe Biden.

'We're dealing with it'

Mr Rogers said the commission was working to address both the misinformation on the electoral process, as well as online threats to staff ahead of the upcoming referendum on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

"We're dealing with it, and we'll continue to monitor it," he said.

The AEC is also working with Indigenous community organisations to educate people in remote and regional areas.

Mr Rogers said information sessions on the referendum electoral process will be held around the country and most of the material will be translated into a range of Indigenous languages.

"We are very conscious of the need to reach into those communities," Mr Rogers said.

"Part of that also is the remote voter services offering that we'll be doing as well, because it's not just about providing information. It's also providing the opportunity for people to vote."

Legislation setting up a referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament passed the Senate on Monday, meaning it will be held before the end of the year.

Voters will be asked to recognise Indigenous Australians in the constitution, through the establishment of a Voice to Parliament.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-22/australian-electoral-commissioner-tom-rogers-social-media-abuse/102507204

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051106

File: 65cd23e9afa1eab⋯.jpg (283.77 KB,2000x1306,1000:653,Andrew_Forrest_left_and_Ol….jpg)

File: f9fa636ac8d12fa⋯.jpg (2.99 MB,6543x4362,3:2,British_Prime_Minister_Ris….jpg)

File: e317f37d73ac2ad⋯.jpg (6.29 MB,6855x4572,2285:1524,People_in_a_bar_in_Kyiv_la….jpg)

>>18949906

Ukraine moves to become a cashless society in anti-corruption bid

Latika Bourke - June 22, 2023

London: Ukraine says it wants to make its economy cashless as soon as possible to stamp out corruption and secure the hundreds of billions of dollars from private investors that it will need to rebuild after the war.

The plans follow the direct urging to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky by Australia’s richest man, Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest, who has unveiled a new investment fund for Ukraine’s reconstruction, kick-started with $US500 million ($735 million) paid for via his private company, Tattarang.

While the likes of Sweden have moved towards a cashless society, Ukraine could be the first in the world to truly achieve it as part of a shift intended to avoid the corruption seen after the Iraq War, when reconstruction funds were used for bribes and kickbacks.

On the most recent Corruption Perceptions Index by Transparency International, Ukraine scored 33 out of 100 – ranking 116 out of 180 countries on the index.

Deputy Minister for the Economy Oleksandr Gryban said Zelensky was “very determined” to move towards a cashless economy and the government would “make everything to make it happen as soon as possible”.

“This is a clear intention of the president, I assure you,” Gryban said.

“He does understand that a number of problems were driven by cash, so one of the last meetings he was managing, cashless economy was just one of the main pillars for the future economic transformation.”

In an interview with this masthead, Forrest said he had not invested in Ukraine before the war, despite becoming one of the country’s most significant philanthropic donors since Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion.

Forrest said the commitment to go cashless made by Gryban was “fantastic” because it would “put the nail in the coffin of corruption”.

“That’s the point I’ve made to the Ukrainian government: cash will lead to corruption. Now here’s your opportunity to go cashless – there’s no reason to have cash in your society, none.”

The fund established by Forrest will be run by Ukraine’s Ministry for Economy and administered by US multinational investment company BlackRock. The Australian mining billionaire hopes to attract other investors and funds of up to $US100 billion.

Forrest said he was confident in Ukraine’s progress and would advise fellow investors to back the country’s rebuild.

“I think it will be like trying to hold back the tide, I really do,” he said.

Forrest will return any dividends, but any returns will be available to co-investors. The fund will be triggered only when the Ukrainian cabinet concludes that the war is over.

Appearing via videolink at the Ukraine Recovery Conference in London, Zelensky said the country was not going back to its old ways after the war, and necessary reforms that would mean it could be admitted to organisations such as the OECD and the European Union were already advancing.

“Even before February 24th, we started dismantling the old oligarchic model of economic relations from the post-Soviet period,” he said.

“Even before February 24th, we started dismantling the old oligarchic model of economic relations from the post-Soviet period,” he said

“And this is not just something about the personalities of the oligarchs, it is about changing the approach to economic relations.

The conference also heard that Britain and France supported the speeding-up of Ukraine’s entry as a member of NATO.

Britain’s Foreign Minister James Cleverly said Ukraine had evolved very quickly and that Finland and Sweden didn’t have to meet the membership action plan that has been demanded of Ukraine before being admitted.

“The Ukrainians have demonstrated their commitment to reform – the military reform required for NATO membership – through their actions on the battlefield, and I think all NATO allies recognise that,” Cleverly said.

NATO leaders, along with those from four specially invited Indo-Pacific countries – Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand – will meet in Lithuania next month when Ukraine’s plea to join will be discussed.

NATO boss Jens Stoltenberg has said the alliance’s door is open to Ukraine but has not issued a formal invitation to join.

Key NATO allies the United States and Germany are sceptical of speeding up Ukraine’s entry.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/twiggy-backs-ukraine-s-ambition-to-go-cashless-in-anti-corruption-bid-20230622-p5dihs.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051132

File: a566dc0024e7dda⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,4528x3086,2264:1543,Prime_Minister_Scott_Morri….jpg)

>>18960157

The surprising reason ScoMo had to hoodwink Macron over AUKUS

Hans van Leeuwen - Jun 22, 2023

1/2

London | Former prime minister Scott Morrison said his controversial decision to hide the truth about the AUKUS deal and the axing of France’s $90 billion submarine contract from President Emmanuel Macron was fuelled by a lack of trust not in the Frenchman but in US President Joe Biden.

The revelation, made in a soon-to-be-released book, casts new light on the events surrounding the announcement of AUKUS in September 2021, highlighting Mr Morrison’s fear that Mr Biden might scupper the $368 billion deal.

Mr Morrison’s clandestine manoeuvres with Washington and London, which led to him dropping the bombshell news of the AUKUS deal on Mr Macron just hours before the announcement, prompted fury in Paris and a rupture in Franco-Australian relations.

The former prime minister has now spoken at length for the first time about why he risked Mr Macron’s wrath, saying he was worried Mr Biden was not locked into the deal until the dotted line was signed.

Mr Morrison said his fear was that if Mr Macron had prematurely found out what Australia was up to, the French leader could have persuaded Mr Biden to back away from the deal – leaving Canberra empty-handed.

“He [Biden] could have said, ‘Oh, you know what, Emmanuel has been in contact. Look, I think we should put this off for a week or two while we work through these issues’,” Mr Morrison told UK-based Australian author Richard Kerbaj, in an updated edition of The Secret History of the Five Eyes that will be released in Australia on July 11.

“At that point containing things would have been impossible. And this would have run and run, and then the opposition would have seen that what we said was going to be announced wasn’t, and then the politics would have been quite catastrophic.”

So, he had to keep Mr Macron in the dark until he was sure Mr Biden and then-British prime minister Boris Johnson would follow through.

“The date for the announcement was really the ink on the deal,” he said.

“We were saying to the Americans and the British, ‘I’m not going to tell them [France] the next bit until we know that this [AUKUS] is on’. … [Otherwise we] then leave it to the French to kill the arrangement that we have with you, and then we stand there left with nothing’.”

Mr Morrison’s choice meant there was a single night between when he told Mr Macron he was cancelling the deal with France’s Naval Group and when the three leaders announced AUKUS the next morning. He described it as “the most sleepless night I had in my entire prime ministership”.

“I was obviously concerned that he [Mr Macron] had a full day to kill it. He would have done anything to prevent that [AUKUS] from happening,” Mr Morrison told Mr Kerbaj.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051142

File: f078ef0f0a96512⋯.jpg (1.15 MB,3024x4032,3:4,Former_prime_minister_Scot….jpg)

File: bcb1d095e9c5b22⋯.jpg (452.72 KB,1524x2339,1524:2339,The_Secret_History_Of_The_….jpg)

>>19051132

2/2

Tight circle

Speaking at the British think-tank Policy Exchange in London late on Wednesday (AEST), Mr Morrison said it was remarkable he was able to maintain that secrecy.

“Everyone who needed to know [about AUKUS] knew that it could so easily be compromised,” he said.

Mr Morrison and his tight circle of advisers originally began developing the AUKUS idea, which will extend British and US nuclear-powered submarine technology to Australia, when Donald Trump was president.

But Mr Morrison was also unsure he could rely on Mr Trump, despite their good relationship, because the dysfunction in Washington meant other government agencies might try to kybosh a White House plan.

“You also had to be conscious of the nature of Trump’s relationship with his own system,” Mr Morrison told Mr Kerbaj.

While the plan was hatched, Mr Morrison had to continue with “Plan A” – the purchase of diesel-powered subs from France, despite growing concerns over potential cost and timetable overruns.

“Morrison could not risk compromising the French deal that Macron was desperately trying to keep alive,” Mr Kerbaj wrote in a new postscript to his book. “Not only because it would likely have infuriated France and damaged Canberra’s diplomatic ties with Paris, but also because it could have easily backfired and made him look like a geopolitical lightweight who had overreached and failed.”

‘Not telling is not the same as lying’

Mr Morrison expressed admiration for Mr Macron, calling him a “canny politician” and “a class act”, and recalling that he had been the first world leader to congratulate him on his 2019 election victory.

But when he went to Paris in June 2021 for dinner with Mr Macron, he complained about Naval Group’s progress while keeping his host in the dark.

“Did I tell him we were going to do AUKUS? No, AUKUS hadn’t happened yet,” Mr Morrison said.

Mr Macron later publicly accused the Australian prime minister of lying to him, but Mr Morrison rejected this.

“Not telling him is not the same as lying to him. I didn’t say we weren’t looking at other contracts. I didn’t say we weren’t looking at other options … and he understood that.”

Mr Morrison also said that after their dinner, there was a flurry of French activity as defence officials contacted their Australian counterparts – suggesting Macron had sensed a threat to the Naval deal.

He recalled Mr Macron telling him that “I don’t like to lose”, which increased his anxiety over July and August as the date of the AUKUS announcement was being nailed down.

“I had my deal. I knew that there would be prices to pay, and I was happy to pay them,” Mr Morrison said. He acknowledged that the price included not only the falling out with Mr Macron, but also the public rebuke from Mr Biden over how the Australians had handled the French.

He also reiterated his long-standing defence of his actions, saying it was in Australia’s national interest to switch to a nuclear submarine option that could only be provided by the US and Britain – and that Mr Macron should understand this.

“If a partner [France] can’t acknowledge you doing something in your national interest, even if it means some disappointment for them, then what’s the relationship? Is it just transactional?” he said.

Speaking at Policy Exchange, Mr Morrison said AUKUS could eventually be expanded to include other participants in various ways, but first “let’s make it work”.

“The delivery challenges are significant,” he said.

https://www.afr.com/world/europe/the-surprising-reason-scomo-had-to-hoodwink-macron-over-aukus-20230622-p5digr

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051159

File: 24bab590bac801b⋯.jpg (190.96 KB,825x441,275:147,GP_306.jpg)

>>18855229 (pb)

George Papadopoulos Tweet

The Australian “diplomat” who lied about me (the reason the sham crossfire investigation investigation went nowhere) also just happened to earmark $25 million to the Clinton foundation while he was Australia’s foreign minister.

Are you catching on yet?

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1671551026753568770

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051180

File: 4d7dbd2cfbaeacd⋯.jpg (79.39 KB,1200x675,16:9,Daniel_Duggan_supporter_Wa….jpg)

File: 29c2c4fb9e81811⋯.jpg (801.1 KB,750x1396,375:698,FDD_5.jpg)

File: b027bd5a94cab82⋯.jpg (1.27 MB,2048x1536,4:3,FzNqJGXaEAEjYcD.jpg)

>>18929002

>>18998407

Parliamentary plea for former pilot's prison release

Andrew Brown - 22 June 2023

A supporter of an Australian citizen facing extradition to the US on conspiracy charges has called for his release from prison in an emotional speech to parliament.

Former marine Daniel Duggan was arrested in October 2022 after the US government accused him of money laundering and committing offences under US arms export control laws.

The father of six, who has also been accused of providing military training to Chinese pilots while a US citizen, has denied the charges.

Mr Duggan's wife Saffrine and his friend Warwick Ponder were on the floor of the Senate on Thursday during a speech by the Greens' David Shoebridge urging the US to release him from custody, where he has been in solitary confinement.

"In the last few weeks, he's seen the sky only a handful of times but has otherwise been locked up completely alone. There are grave concerns with Dan's wellbeing," Senator Shoebridge told parliament.

"How can he be extradited for something that isn't even an offence in Australia and therefore fails the dual criminality test?"

Senator Shoebridge said Mr Duggan's arrest and threat of extradition raised serious concerns.

"There are big red flags around Dan's prosecution by the US. The timing of the indictment by US authorities in 2017 was exactly when the United States started talking about China as a strategic challenge," he said.

"It's clear to many this is a politicised extradition and prosecution, with the dual aims of making an example of China and Australia placating our AUKUS allies."

https://thewest.com.au/politics/parliamentary-plea-for-former-pilots-prison-release-c-11057576

https://twitter.com/FreeDanDuggan/status/1671800213135302656

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19051251

File: 30ea44d74f272ff⋯.jpg (48.41 KB,1200x724,300:181,In_this_photo_made_from_vi….jpg)

File: f08fd42397e3d81⋯.jpg (409.39 KB,1923x1270,1923:1270,Gerald_Ridsdale_outside_co….jpg)

File: 0c31d063410f15e⋯.jpg (123.1 KB,985x542,985:542,St_Brigid_s_Catholic_Secon….jpg)

Notorious paedophile Gerald Ridsdale pleads guilty to fresh charge relating to 72nd victim of abuse

Laura Mayers - 22 June 2023

Notorious prolific paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale has pleaded guilty to another charge relating to a historical sex offences.

Ridsdale was charged in 2022 with one count of indecent assault of a minor in the 1980s, and today he pleaded guilty to that charge.

It comes after the victim-survivor came forward after he was assaulted at St Brigid's College in Horsham by the then-assistant priest between 1987 and 1988.

The Ballarat Magistrates Court heard this afternoon the priest told the then-13-year-old boy "it's alright" as he molested him.

He was acting as a counsellor to the teenager at the time.

The college student is the 72nd known victim-survivor of Ridsdale's abuse.

The plea today brings the former priest's charges to a total of 192, the court heard today he had been dealt with by the court on seven previous occasions.

Ridsdale has admitted to offending the over 70 minors between 1961 to 1988.

Last year Ridsdale was sentenced for the seventh time over the sexual abuse of two boys in Mortlake in the 1980s.

He is currently serving a near 40-year sentence and is expected to be eligible for parole in 2027 — when he will be 93 years old.

The former priest from South West and Central Victoria appeared via video link into the Ballarat Magistrates Court today from St John's at Port Phillip prison.

The court heard the 89-year-old had a fall in his cell in Hopkins Correctional Centre last November, and was left lying on the floor for hours before he was found.

He is now bed-bound and a hoist is required to move him.

The frail-looking, elderly man appeared from a reclining bed with blankets and said little during the proceedings.

Ridsdale will be sentenced for his 192nd charge in August.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-22/notorious-paedophile-gerald-ridsdale-pleads-guilty-fresh-charge/102509688

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058008

File: 1b074bc8914e9de⋯.jpg (84.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_says_the_Voic….jpg)

File: b6c3c15d2aa7905⋯.jpg (87.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Peter Dutton doubles down, says Voice risks reconciliation

ELLEN RANSLEY - JUNE 23, 2023

Peter Dutton is refusing to back down from claims the Voice to parliament referendum is a risky manoeuvre that threatens reconciliation despite the Prime Minister accusing him of speaking “without a heart”.

Days after the parliament passed the necessary legislation to set up the referendum, Mr Dutton on Friday doubled down on his argument that Australians are not ready to vote on the Voice due to a lack of detail and said the government should amend its plans for constitutional recognition.

Capping off a week of intense questioning in parliament by the opposition on the extent of the Voice’s powers, Mr Dutton warned the proposal risked “splitting the country in half”.

He said the government should instead push back the vote and then poll Australians just on constitutional recognition, suggesting keeping the Voice separate – as a body to be legislated by the government – would be a “better outcome”.

“If it’s certain that the Voice is going to fail, or if it gets to 51-49 in favour, it basically splits the country in half,” he told Channel 9.

“The unifying moment for the country instead of the division the Prime Minister is propagating is to come together to support constitutional recognition – we would have 80 or 90 per cent support for that. That would be a batter question to put.

“If the Prime Minister continues because he thinks there’s a political advantage that sets back reconciliation … everyone wants a better outcome.”

Recent polls suggest support for the Voice is waning, but the government is confident Australians will take up the “gracious” offer of Indigenous Australians to legislate a Voice in the Constitution that allows the country’s First Peoples to give advice and make representations on matters that directly affect them.

Deputy Opposition Leader Sussan Ley on Friday said the Liberal Party was extending an “offer of friendship” with the government by proposing an alternative.

“If the Voice goes down and loses support, it risks the whole mission of reconciliation in this country and takes a step backwards,” she told Channel 7.

“I think it is time for the Prime Minister to consider whether he just wants to stick to his original timeline, which I believe is a political timeline, or whether he actually, genuinely wants to work with all members across the parliament to support something as critical as constitutional recognition of our First Australians.”

Mr Albanese on Thursday stressed that the idea of recognition through a Voice was not a Canberra original thought but had come from Indigenous Australians themselves.

He accused Mr Dutton of stirring up division and confusion through misinformation.

“In 2017, Indigenous Australians met and agreed on the Uluru statement from the heart,” Mr Albanese said.

“The Leader of the Opposition has just given a statement without a heart.”

Mr Albanese has also downplayed claims from the opposition that Australians were lacking details.

He said the question, the constitutional provision, and the design principles for the Voice were all “clear”.

“All of this information has been available, in some cases for many years, most of it developed when the former Coalition was in government,” he said.

“What’s just as clear is that those opposite, some, are not interested in answers.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/peter-dutton-doubles-down-says-voice-risks-reconciliation/news-story/39517a47b36e76eec95f1def132c2272

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058029

File: 4fcab45690a791c⋯.jpg (103.69 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 9a1c747333a2edb⋯.jpg (93.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Anthony Albanese says the voice will have no power of veto yet some senators persist with allegations

PAIGE TAYLOR and NICK EVANS - JUNE 23, 2023

Anthony Albanese has accused some politicians who oppose the Indigenous voice to parliament of dishonesty by proposing scenarios they know to be impossible.

On Friday, the Prime Minister again rejected the opposition’s call for the voice referendum to be delayed and pared back to a question about constitutional recognition only.

Mr Albanese’s comments came as mining giant BHP donated $2m to the Yes campaign, matching the donation of Rio Tinto.

BHP revealed the donation on Friday, as the company released the latest update to its reconciliation action plan, which reiterates BHP’s ongoing support for a Yes vote at the referendum and promises to “connect our workforce to information about a voice and the matters it is seeking to address”.

Peter Dutton has proposed that Australians are asked at a referendum whether the constitution should be altered to simply acknowledge the existence of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people before white settlement.

The current referendum question asks Australians if they agree to an amendment in the constitution to acknowledge Indigenous Australians through the establishment of an Indigenous body that can make representations to the parliament and the executive government.

The referendum is widely expected to be held in October, though Mr Albanese is yet to announce the date.

Mr Albanese said he respected that some people did not want the constitution to change “but some of the arguments that are put forward, that people know are not true, the people putting them forward know are not true”.

Mr Albanese said the voice would not have any veto right over any parliamentary legislation, yet some opponents persisted with claims that it would.

“I don’t believe that senators arguing that a road in Victoria was going to be the subject of the voice believe that that’s the case,” he said.

“I don’t think that the people who ask questions in the parliament this week about interest rates and the Reserve Bank don’t understand that the Reserve Bank is independent.

“The idea that the voice is going to sit around and the governor of the Reserve Bank is going to say, ‘Oh, I wonder what the voice thinks?’ – like, seriously.

“This debate is too important for that politicisation. And people, I think, have to rise to the occasion.”

The Opposition Leader said Mr Albanese had made a “catastrophic mistake” in his handling of the voice referendum and that he was taking the country down a “divisive path”.

Mr Dutton said the two major parties “could come together” to provide constitutional recognition to prevent the “setback” of reconciliation if the referendum was to fail.

“I think there are millions of Australians who just want to know what it is they’re being asked to vote for,” Mr Dutton said at a conference on the Gold Coast. “All of us want a better outcome for Indigenous Australians, particularly in regional and remote areas. I agree that it sets back reconciliation (if the referendum fails) and if the Prime Minister is set on that course going into an election or going to a referendum election knowing that it’s going to fail and that reconciliation will be set back, he should delay it or pull it back altogether.”

The leaders pressed their positions on Friday after a week of debate about what the voice would advise on. The proposed constitutional amendment says the voice can make representations on matters affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. However, an explanatory memorandum published alongside the government’s referendum bill in March said it would be impractical and unrealistic for the voice to offer advice on everything that affects Indigenous Australians.

While Uluru Dialogue co-chair Megan Davis and fellow constitutional expert Gabrielle Appleby have argued that the scope of the voice is its strength, they have also said the voice will need to spend its political capital wisely or risk losing relevance and authority.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-says-the-voice-will-have-no-power-of-veto-yet-some-senators-persist-with-allegations/news-story/a4ee340aaa8be189e4c2e4ee7e4c60eb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058047

File: 74f9fe12c529824⋯.jpg (115.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,BHP_President_Australia_Ge….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

BHP joins Rio Tinto in donating to Yes campaign for the Voice

NICK EVANS - JUNE 23, 2023

Mining giant BHP has donated $2m to the campaign to back the campaign for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, matching the donation of Rio Tinto.

BHP confirmed the donation on Friday, as the company released the latest update to its reconciliation action plan, which reiterates BHP’s ongoing support for a yes vote at the referendum and promises to “connect our workforce to information about a Voice and the matters it is seeking to address”.

BHP backed the movement to recognise an Indigenous voice in 2019, in its statement of support for the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and has maintained support ever since.

BHP President Minerals Australia Geraldine Slattery said on Friday the decision to back the Yes campaign with cash was “aligned with our support for broader efforts towards reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians”.

“BHP’s relationships with Indigenous Australians are fundamentally important to our company. We operate on traditional lands and we engage and partner widely with Indigenous communities and Traditional Owners. We are the largest resources sector employer of Indigenous Australians and we are a rapidly growing partner to Indigenous-owned businesses,” she said.

But, while BHP has publicly backed the campaign in favour of the Voice, Ms Slattery said the company respected that some of its staff held a different view.

“The outcome of the referendum will be determined by the Australian people. We recognise that there is a diversity of views, as may be expected for such a meaningful and important initiative,” she said.

“We will support informed, respectful discussion within our company and more broadly about the Voice, why it has been proposed and what it is seeking to address. We will provide opportunities for employees to get the information they need and feel safe to discuss different views with their colleagues and communities, so they can make their own informed decision.”

BHP joins Rio Tinto in donated towards the Yes campaign, and adds to the $17m in donations announced in April by a group of Australia’s richest philanthropists and family foundations – including $5m from the Paul Ramsay Foundation, first announced in February, and commitments from the Hansen Little Foundation, Geoff Ainsworth’s Oranges and Sardines, and The Myer Foundation.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday he was committed to holding a referendum on the Voice in the last quarter of 2023, despite polling that suggests support for the idea is wavering.

Mr Albanese is expected to announce a date for the referendum at the Garma Festival in Arnhem Land in early August.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/bhp-joins-rio-tinto-in-donating-to-yes-campaign-for-the-voice/news-story/9bbd350f741724c92aa5ccfb9bc9c319

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058136

File: 89aa5416720dd3f⋯.jpg (164.45 KB,1024x768,4:3,Brittany_Higgins_and_partn….jpg)

File: 99f29e200bab9e5⋯.jpg (120.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,National_Press_Club_Presid….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Sharaz and Higgins: ‘We’d become quite a twosome on game planning’

Brittany Higgins’ book appears to have been shelved. One look at the rough draft and it’s not hard to understand why.

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - 24 June 2023

1/3

“Honestly, I feel like a B-grade Grace Tame. She exists outside and beyond the political bubble. Court case closed, awarded and revered. Here I am in the mud with the pigs – fighting for control of the daily news cycle. Throwing mud: A WhatsApp here, a voicemail there, a drop to Sam.”

Those 51 words are included in the beginnings of a draft book by Brittany Higgins. If the book was completed, it hasn’t been published. And it is not hard to understand why it may have been shelved. Higgins may be a household name but to many women it’s far from clear she is the epitome of an empowered young woman. Whether she is any kind of role model for women at all increasingly is being questioned.

Inquirer has seen parts of what Higgins calls a “rough” draft outline of her proposed book to be published by Penguin Random House. A draft was sent by Higgins to the publisher in April 2021 – four months before her alleged assailant, Bruce Lehrmann, was charged in August with one charge of sexual intercourse without consent. Lehrmann has always maintained his innocence.

This draft book is headed #NotJustADaughter and is dedicated to David Sharaz. It consists of 35 chapter headings with notes under each, from chapter one, headed “Freedom of Speech”, to chapter 35, headed “Restoration”. Then there is a timeline and just over 12 pages of “Book Contents” followed by material noted under “Future use – Research/Notes”.

Had the book been completed, it might have borne no resemblance to material in this draft. Nonetheless, the draft book seen by Inquirer gives an insight into how Higgins appeared to have planned, in at least early 2021, on using the media and politics in what became the nation’s biggest political sex scandal.

Extracts reveal Higgins writing more about a political and media scandal than about a police investigation. One section of the draft book includes this: “The Liberal Party had spent the last three years training me how to play media games. If I was going to do this, I was going to do it right. It had to be seamless. It needed to be done before a sitting fortnight. They had to front questions and cameras. There would be an inevitable lull in the media cycle following Covid-19. I had considered sitting on this for another few months but as soon as we the Party moved into election mode, they would be churning out stories and announcements on an almost daily basis. If this was going to happen it was now or never.”

Another section of the draft book includes this: “We had become quite a twosome when it came to game planning. My experience as a media adviser, David’s experience as a producer; together we understood how the gallery media sphere operated.”

There is a section of notes towards the end of the draft headed: “Journalists in media scandals”.

This section includes the following: “In the case of scandals, ‘passionless detachment’ quickly gives way to a passionate ‘attached journalism’ of indignation which slips easily into advocacy.”

To many people, the more material that comes to light, the more this young woman appears to be the human casualty of a political scandal, the willing victim of politicians, especially female politicians, and women in the media who seem to have spent the past few years using her rape allegation in a minister’s office to pursue their own ends.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058140

File: 6d52017dcea75ab⋯.jpg (93.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Higgins_arrives_at_court_f….jpg)

File: 26bca53af00e095⋯.jpg (103.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Dillaway_the_former_bo….jpg)

>>19058136

2/3

Another part of the draft book seen by Inquirer covers Higgins and Sharaz war-gaming the meeting with prime minister Scott Morrison.

“I had war gamed the meeting. I would fly to Canberra. I would allow myself to be at the mercy of the press gallery again. Why did I have to come up with the agenda and the solutions to these deeply complex problems as well. For the past few months, I had kept waiting for a political saviour to come valiantly into the mix and salvage the situation. To take the reins of this movement and turn it into meaningful change. Peta, Julie, Julia perhaps? No such figure emerged. I liken it to the Greek myth of Sisyphus. Punished by Zeus and forced to spend an eternity pushing a boulder up a hill. It was still just me, facing what felt like an immovable force. And for what? To be abused online? To muddy the waters in a criminal case? To make enemies of former friends? To alienate myself from potential employees? The reasons not to press forward felt endless. The truth of it was that I was always going to follow this through. Why? Because it was the right thing to do.”

Another part of the draft book is headed “Scandal in politics” and includes this: “The media is orientated towards themes rather than facts. Their day-to-day output continues to tell merely several stories in instalments. Political power is becoming more and more inseparable from the correct handling of scandals. Politicians who have the most friends in the press gallery enjoy the longest political lives.”

Yet another part includes this about “Political Scandals in media”: “The pragmatic goal is set by the subject and journalists accept it because it fits well within their institutional purpose. The epistemic object of scandal is a story which does not exist as a fact but because the story is a cultural teleology. To determine what behaviour of a politician may provoke a scandal is something that depends on the cultural framework where such behaviour is made meaningful.”

None of this is earth-shatteringly interesting. By Higgins’s own admission it is an early draft. Some of it is entirely in note form, such as this section headed “RESEARCH/NOTES

“Overview:

“Major themes: Innocence – Horror – Triumph.

“Key Milestones: Assault – Cover up – Media storm.

“Words: 90,000.”

The former staffer then compiled what she called “Dickinson Character Hooks”.

“Bruce Character: RM wearing, suit wearing, born to rule, Northern Beaches elite, deep family ties to the republican party and Cheshire cat grin.

“David Character: Well intentioned, earnest, talkative, disheveled, communicator, funny and self-depreciating, awkward glasses move.

“Reynolds Character: Nervous, eager to please, self-serving, ambitious, cowardly, intolerant. Carla Zampatti wearing party loyalist.

“Ciobo Character: Laissez-fare, privileged, bored, spoiled, flirty, charismatic, boyish quality.”

There is a section in the draft book headed “Trial by media” that says: “Did I do something bad?” “This whole precident (sic), this trial by media?” “Is this all my fault? I cried into David’s chest.

“Honestly, I didn’t feel like I had a choice. There was no other way, I weeped. Exhaustion had sunk it.”

Even in rough draft form, Higgins’s book is a window – if a somewhat clumsy one – into what appeared to be driving her at the time: being part of a political scandal that might turn journalists into advocates and ensnare people in power.

The draft doesn’t stand alone either. It has been reported that police found a text exchange on Higgins’s phone dated six weeks before the alleged rape. She and former boyfriend Ben ­Dillaway appeared to be joking about wanting a political sex scandal.

“The bar for what counts as a political sex scandal nowadays is REALLY low,” Higgins wrote.

“I want a sex scandal I can be like whoa. Impressive. Didn’t think he had it in him,” Dillaway wrote.

“Exactly! A sex scandal the party can be proud of. Another Barnaby but without the baby haha,” Higgins responded.

Inquirer has been told of a note on Higgins’s phone dated May 2020 that featured lines about “Anatomy of a Political Scandal”. It started with the word “thesis” and mentioned “media lens of a political sex scandal”. During cross-examination of Higgins on the Friday afternoon of the first week of the trial, ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum intercepted this piece of evidence, refusing defence lawyers’ requests to ask Higgins about it. It was never tendered. “Anatomy of a Political Scandal” appears to have been written around the time that Higgins and Sharaz became an item. The note is dated many months before The Project interview, and well before Sharaz and Lisa Wilkinson exchanged emails headed “#MeToo Liberal Party Project Pitch”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058146

File: ba9f74458891f09⋯.jpg (121.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_with_her_….jpg)

File: 4847360ec00c8b1⋯.jpg (394.74 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Grace_Tame_and_Brittany_Hi….jpg)

>>19058140

3/3

There are sound reasons many people are troubled by what they see as Higgins’s fixation on a political sex scandal – evidenced by texts, notes and in her draft book.

Somewhere in this saga is an allegation of rape. And this is what makes this story such a dismal episode for the so-called women’s movement. People such as Heidi Yates, the ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner, have lauded Higgins for her advocacy work. But what precisely has Higgins become an advocate for? To many women, Higgins has become known, most famously, as the woman who chose to go to the media first, to politicians second, and to the police, to lodge a formal complaint, third.

I don’t recall Higgins saying, in hindsight, this was a mistake. I can’t recall her saying, with the benefit of hindsight, women should go to the police first because the media and political storm has not been good for me. That’s a shame because it means Higgins has become the wrong kind of role model for many women. For some women who are ensconced in politics, it might not be as apparent why feeding a political scandal was a flawed priority. But for many other women there is another lesson from the Higgins saga.

It goes like this: putting the media and politics ahead of the criminal justice system did nothing to help a prosecution. Appearing at the March4Justice when she was due to meet AFP officers suggested to many that Higgins’s priority was not the criminal justice system.

Her pursuit of a book deal, with the help of Peter FitzSimons – even before Lehrmann had been charged – would always risk painting her in a poor light as a woman who was more focused on the media than on rape prosecution. Perhaps Higgins can’t see that yet. Perhaps she never will. But there are telling signs she can’t have missed. Two days after this newspaper published text messages between Higgins and Sharaz revealing how the pair ­planned to enlist the help of senior Labor figures to pursue Higgins’s rape allegation and her claim the Coalition government covered it up, Tame was reported as deleting an Instagram post where she called Higgins “a national hero” and described her as a “warrior” and “my friend”.

Other sections of the media also appear to have become more curious about this saga instead of simply joining the droning echo chamber of Higgins supporters.

Higgins has a few things in common with Meghan Markle, who railed against an institution and assumed that the more media she did, the better it would be for her credibility. Markle learned some sections of the media were more curious than others. And that curiosity, testing many of Markle’s claims, hasn’t turned out well for her credibility or her celebrity.

Similarly, Higgins and Sharaz were mistaken if they imagined they could control how their story would play out. Relying on “friendlies” in politics and the media was always doomed to end badly, not just for Higgins but for the “friendlies”. Both have lost credibility. Higgins is no role model and the “friendly” journalists are reduced to complaining that while it was fine for Higgins to use media as a tool, media who discover the truth must suppress it if it paints Higgins in a less than flattering light.

Once Higgins chose the media and politics over police, information that exposes the extent of Higgins’s political and media manoeuvrings must be made public.

Rape is too serious a crime to be pursued by media trials and political crusades. Rape, when it happens, warrants a jail term. And only the criminal justice system should be allowed to do that. Taking short cuts, via the media or politics, is the worst possible course for women. Higgins took the short cuts. In the draft book, she describes having her name associated with the March4Justice as likely being “the most defining moment of my life”.

Higgins is young. Hopefully she will go on to do great things. But there is always the risk that the most defining event of her life will turn out to be her role in turning an allegation of a serious crime into a political-media circus.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/brittany-higgins-bruce-lehrmann-and-david-sharaz-an-anatomy-of-a-political-scandal/news-story/ebc2781968d6ef0ebd50a40735bb3c5a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058165

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18928680

>>18954987

Bruce Lehrmann breaks his silence on Brittany Higgins case. Full 7NEWS Spotlight Interview

7NEWS Spotlight

Jun 14, 2023

The man accused of raping Brittany Higgins in Parliament House has admitted he told three different stories to three different people when asked why he was in the office at the time the alleged rape took place.

In a 7NEWS Spotlight exclusive, Bruce Lehrmann has offered his version of events.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lq1er-f9wrs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058367

File: 840cef5be179c71⋯.jpg (114.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Russia_has_launched_legal_….jpg)

File: d4f08694f951857⋯.jpg (177.44 KB,1024x768,4:3,A_Russian_diplomat_was_fou….jpg)

File: 006aadfc00e8909⋯.jpg (135.69 KB,1280x720,16:9,He_was_still_there_on_Frid….jpg)

File: 0131c334f0f675e⋯.jpg (51.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19011145

>>19016596

Russian Federation launches High Court action against decision to block new embassy in Canberra

CATIE MCLEOD - JUNE 23, 2023

1/2

The Russian Federation has officially launched legal action in the highest court in Australia as it challenges the government’s decision to block its plans for a new embassy in Canberra.

Lawyers acting on behalf of Russian Ambassador Alexey Pavlovsky filed an injunction in the High Court on Friday afternoon against new laws that tore up the Kremlin’s lease for the proposed embassy site in Yarralumla.

The Albanese government had been preparing for a potential High Court challenge after crushing Russia’s embassy plans over concerns the site’s proximity to Parliament House posed a spying risk.

The Kremlin is challenging the new laws on constitutional grounds, arguing the commonwealth didn’t have just terms for terminating its lease, according to court documents filed on Friday.

Russia will fight in the High Court to prevent the commonwealth from entering the site in question or making any moves to re-lease the parcel of land until the legal dispute is resolved.

The court documents reveal Russia paid more than $2.75m in 2008 to be allowed to sign a 99-year lease for the parcel of land, with ongoing annual rental payments of just five cents.

Under the terms of the lease, Russia was to be granted “quiet enjoyment of the land without interruption by the commonwealth” as long as it paid the rent and met its other obligations.

But the embassy plans were dogged by issues from the start, with court documents showing Russia has spent more than $US5.5m on developing the land with little success.

Russia agreed to start building its new diplomatic complex on the site within 18 months of signing the lease but failed to do so.

The commonwealth didn’t terminate Russia’s lease at the time, even though it would have been allowed to because the embassy hadn’t been built within the agreed time frame.

From 2010 to 2020, the commonwealth and the National Capital Authority continued to assist Russia to construct the embassy, court documents show.

Russia started construction on the site in 2016 but had to down tools the following year after it fell into dispute with its building contractor.

After finding a new contractor, Russia restarted construction in 2020 but the process was slowed by Covid-19 shutdowns.

By June last year, a consular building had been erected on the site but the remainder of the planned diplomatic complex was yet to be built.

In August last year, Canberra’s National Capital Authority issued an eviction order to the Russian embassy to leave the site.

The planning authority said Russia hadn’t met the conditions of its lease because it hadn’t finished construction in the agreed upon time frame or been granted an extension by the commonwealth.

Russia then successfully challenged this decision in the Federal Court, prompting the federal government to enact new laws to permanently prevent the new embassy from being built.

Those laws were rushed through parliament last week and Russia now intends to challenge them in the High Court, with an initial hearing expected to take place on Monday.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058373

File: 9ec486702e6e893⋯.jpg (73.22 KB,1024x768,4:3,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 50fcff5e36ea40c⋯.jpg (68.82 KB,1024x768,4:3,Russian_President_Vladimir….jpg)

>>19058367

2/2

Anthony Albanese said last week the government had received “clear national security advice” that the proximity of the parcel of land to parliament could enable “potential interference” by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s envoys to Australia.

Australian officials were expecting Russia to file an injunction late this week to buy time to prepare a formal case, although the High Court must agree to hear the case if it is to proceed.

A spokesman for Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil said the Russian Federation had informed the commonwealth of its plans to challenge the laws in the High Court.

“Russia’s challenge to the validity of the law is not unexpected, this is part of the Russian playbook,” the spokesman said.

Court documents show Russia is being represented in its High Court action by Canberra-based law firm Nelson & Hill Lawyers, which NCA NewsWire has attempted to contact for comment.

NCA NewsWire also contacted the Russian Embassy in Canberra, where a spokesman said: “We do not comment on the Yarralumla issue”.

Speaking before the injunction was filed, the Prime Minister brushed off concerns about the potential legal challenge, saying he was confident of the commonwealth’s ability to evict Russia from the site.

Mr Albanese vowed to stand up for Australia’s national security but downplayed any risks posed by a Russian diplomat who was discovered illegally squatting on the site formerly proposed for the new embassy.

“The national security threat that was represented by a Russian embassy on-site is not the same as some bloke standing on a blade of grass. We don’t see as a threat to our national security,” Mr Albanese said.

Last week’s legislative changes have invalidated Russia’s lease, making the diplomat — who was photographed at the site on Thursday dressed in casual attire and nonchalantly smoking a cigarette — an illegal squatter.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham accused Mr Albanese of failing to take the issue seriously enough.

Senator Birmingham called on the government to explore every possible legal avenues to evict the squatter and to prevent Russia from occupying the contested site.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/russian-federation-launches-high-court-action-against-decision-to-block-new-embassy-in-canberra/news-story/1b3e36146a12b9e457db59f5cc0af791

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19058407

File: 6a639634284b7d9⋯.jpg (2.48 MB,4917x3278,3:2,_It_s_about_like_minded_co….jpg)

File: 2dfb54d6e8196a9⋯.jpg (4.3 MB,9000x6000,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

Germany invites Australia into elite ‘climate club’

Matthew Knott - June 23, 2023

Australia will be invited to join a high-powered “climate club” for countries with ambitious emissions reductions goals when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese makes an expected visit to Berlin next month to meet with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.

Joining the German-led group would help Australia avoid potential European trade sanctions on countries that fail to take urgent action to tackle climate change.

The two leaders will also seek to advance what would be the biggest defence export deal in Australian history, a $6.5 billion proposal to supply over 200 Australian-made armoured vehicles to the German army.

German ambassador to Australia Markus Ederer said the election of the Albanese government had opened up new opportunities for the countries to work together on low-emissions technologies and critical minerals exports.

“With the arrival of a new government which is taking serious climate action, I think there’s a lot of convergence between our climate agendas,” he said in an interview.

He said Germany, the world’s fourth-largest economy, was eager to see Australia join a new “climate club” established by the G7 nations at Scholz’s urging last December.

“It’s about like-minded countries who want to reduce emissions in industry, and in such a way that we do not get into trade wars because we have different standards,” Ederer said.

Over 20 countries have now joined the club, including the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, and most recently Indonesia.

Albanese is expected to visit Berlin in July before travelling to Lithuania for the NATO summit, but the trip has not been officially confirmed by either side.

Ederer expressed hope an ambitious free trade deal between Australia and the European Union could be struck within months, despite Trade Minister Don Farrell recently saying negotiations had hit an impasse.

“Germany is a strong supporter for a timely conclusion of an ambitious agreement,” Ederer said.

He applauded the federal government for introducing legislation this month to ban the display of Nazi symbols, as Germany did after World War II.

“Nazism and anti-semitism are on the rise in some of our countries and we have to really stem the flood,” he said.

“These symbols should never be displayed again.”

Germany released a landmark national security strategy earlier this month that labelled China a “systemic rival” and declared the nation had entered a “watershed era” following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Ederer, who served as the European Union’s ambassador to Russia before arriving in Australia last year, said: “Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has totally destroyed the fundamentals of European security as they were laid down in the Treaty of Paris – the idea that everybody respects each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, the idea of no change of borders through violence.”

Germany has become the second-biggest donor of military aid to Ukraine after the United States in a stunning reversal of the country’s post-WWII policy not to send weapons into conflict zones.

Ederer urged Australia to continue to assist the Ukrainian war effort, saying a defeat for Russian President Vladimir Putin would send a “clear strategic signal to others who may think about such adventures – potentially also outside of Europe”.

Ederer said Germany shared similar concerns to Australia about “coercive behaviour” by Beijing and took a tough line on a potential Chinese invasion of the self-governing island of Taiwan.

“This issue about Taiwan is of utmost importance as a showcase of whether a big power will respect international law or whether somebody can follow, as Russia does with Ukraine, the principle of ‘might makes right’,” he said.

The Australian and German governments started formal negotiations earlier this year on an unusual deal that would see German defence company Rheinmetall manufacture 123 heavy weapons carrier vehicles in Queensland for the German army.

The contract may be expanded by over 100 extra vehicles, making it Australia’s biggest ever defence export deal.

Ederer said it made sense for Australia and Germany to deepen their defence co-operation given both nations were politically stable democracies seeking to diversify their supply chains.

But he warned against any “goalposts being shifted” in negotiations, saying: “What is important is that we see transparent and predictable procurement processes.”

Germany, which was previously been accused of free-riding on NATO allies for its security, is planning to spend an extra $16 billion a year on defence in a major spending ramp-up.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/germany-invites-australia-into-elite-climate-club-20230623-p5diy2.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19064520

File: 291f0b5a88cc56b⋯.jpg (69.11 KB,1022x681,1022:681,Communications_Minister_Mi….jpg)

File: bb320eac12ef2e5⋯.jpg (70.59 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Mark_Zuckerberg_s_Meta_wou….jpg)

>>19051042

Social media giants to face multimillion-dollar fines for spreading fake news

Anthony Galloway - June 24, 2023

Social media giants will be hit with millions of dollars in fines if they repeatedly fail to remove disinformation and misinformation from their platforms under a major crackdown by the Albanese government.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland will on Sunday release draft legislation to give the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) powers to hold digital platforms to account for spreading harmful fake news.

“Mis- and disinformation sows division within the community, undermines trust and can threaten public health and safety,” Rowland said.

“The Albanese government is committed to keeping Australians safe online, and that includes ensuring the ACMA has the powers it needs to hold digital platforms to account for mis- and disinformation on their services.”

Under the proposed laws, the authority would be able to impose a new “code” on specific companies that repeatedly fail to combat misinformation and disinformation or an industry-wide “standard” to force digital platforms to remove harmful content.

The maximum penalty for systemic breaches of a registered code would be $2.75 million or 2 per cent of global turnover – whichever is higher.

The maximum penalty for breaching an industry standard would be $6.88 million, or 5 per cent of a company’s global turnover. In the case of Facebook’s owner, Meta, for example, the maximum penalty could amount to a fine of more than $8 billion.

Codes or standards could include requiring platforms to have better tools to identify and report misinformation, a more robust complaint handling processes and greater use of fact-checkers.

Under the proposed laws, the ACMA would also be able to obtain information and documents from digital platforms relating to misinformation and disinformation on their services. But the government says the ACMA would not have a role in determining what is true or false.

The proposed powers will not apply to individual pieces of content, authorised electoral material or professional news content.

The draft legislation will go out for public consultation from Sunday, which Rowland said would give companies and the public the chance to have their say.

Rowland said the laws aimed to “strike the right balance between protection from harmful mis- and disinformation online and freedom of speech”.

“I encourage all stakeholders to make a submission and look forward to introducing the bill into parliament later this year, following the consultation process,” she said.

Western governments have shown a growing concern over the threat of authoritarian countries spreading disinformation to sow dissent within democracies.

The European Union enacted new laws in a similar crackdown on social media companies last year, which include fines of up to 6 per cent of global turnover.

In Australia, there has been growing concern about the proliferation of misinformation and hate speech over the Voice to parliament referendum.

ASIO director-general Mike Burgess last month said his agency was “on the lookout” for attempts by other countries to interfere in the referendum.

Tech giants have been expecting Australia to introduce a voluntary code of practice for years.

Social media companies are increasingly self-regulating and last month several tech giants released transparency reports under a voluntary code, where they detailed efforts to minimise harm from misinformation published on their platforms over the previous year.

Google removed more than 300,000 videos from YouTube for containing dangerous or misleading COVID-19 information, including 3000 uploaded from Australia.

Meta “took action” on more than 91,000 pieces of content across Facebook and Instagram for violating its misinformation policies.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/social-media-giants-to-face-multimillion-dollar-fines-for-spreading-fake-news-20230623-p5dj07.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19064532

File: 9e6b283ad6f9a46⋯.jpg (274.29 KB,1590x1060,3:2,New_national_cybersecurity….jpg)

>>19016648

>>19031657

Air Force’s readiness chief sent into Home Affairs to fortify response to ‘cyber scumbags’

Julian Bajkowski - June 23, 2023

The former head of the Royal Australian Air Force’s VIP operations and current air commander, Air Vice-Marshal Darren Goldie, will become the head of the National Office of Cyber Security and Australia’s cyber security coordinator within the Department of Home Affairs. The appointment is a major win for the military in the pecking order of Australia’s sprawling cyber estate.

The announcement by prime minister Anthony Albanese and home affairs minister Clare O’Neil on Friday cements in place a key election commitment to have a dedicated national cyber-coordination function run out of the Home Affairs portfolio rather than Defence, where offensive capability still vests.

However, Goldie’s secondment — he is not leaving the RAAF — underlines the degree of difficulty and trust required in appointing a national cyber chief to a largely civilian agency that necessarily lacks the specific powers granted to signals intelligence agencies to perform proactive intrusions to mitigate attacks before they happen.

The appointment of a uniformed Air Force two-star general to the cyber coordinator’s role also defuses potential friction and irritation in the military over the propensity of politicians to oversimplify the increasingly complex and volatile cyber domain by making it into their political hobby horse without taking into account the views of those at the pointy end of operations.

Under current cyber doctrine, the exfiltration and compromise of data and information from systems has largely been accepted as a norm of espionage and intelligence operations, while cyber attacks that seek to replicate kinetic attacks — such as destroying infrastructure or crashing planes — is largely interpreted as war-like.

However, these boundaries are being pushed and tested by Russian-speaking actors who have created an extortion industry from ransomware attacks that both encrypt a target’s data and release it into the public domain.

Goldie will be responsible for trying to coordinate the prevention and response to those kinds of incidents that also straddle the corporate world and rope in critical infrastructure that is now the subject of its own legislation that businesses must comply with.

Currently responsible for making sure Air Force is operationally ready to spring into action at any time — and there is a high operational tempo as Australia pursues force interoperability — Goldie’s leadership and coordination skills were called out as key qualities.

A Hercules pilot by trade, Goldie has had active service in operations on the world’s roughest and toughest airstrips in East Timor, Iraq and Afghanistan and is listed as having 5000 flying hours on his biography.

O’Neil was clear about her expectations for Goldie.

Asked whether Goldie would give advice on whether or not to pay ransoms to ransomware actors O’Neil emphasised denial was a key element of resistance to attacks.

“We [need to] deprive these cyber scumbags of their proceeds of crime,” the Home Affairs minister said, before clarifying it was the government’s position that ransoms are best not paid.

Asked about what lay in front of him on the cyber front Goldie said the “challenge is dire”.

Both the PM and home affairs minister deflected questions about whether an unclassified version of the secret Mrdak review into cyber security has been given to cabinet.

“We are a serious government. This isn’t a game. Cabinet documents are for cabinet,” Albanese said.

Asked how Goldie was selected, the PM said Goldie stood out as having a proven record of leadership, and that proper processes were followed in his appointment.

“We have proper cabinet processes. We discussed it,” Albanese said, before thanking the Chief of the Defence Force for “agreeing to this secondment”.

https://www.themandarin.com.au/223494-air-forces-readiness-chief-sent-into-home-affairs-to-fortify-response-to-cyber-scumbags/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19064564

File: 2e99125ebcc453c⋯.jpg (1.46 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Jacinta_Allan_is_the_most_….jpg)

File: 3c12dc132320425⋯.jpg (946.79 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,Many_in_South_Australia_s_….jpg)

File: c74c50fd78b7151⋯.jpg (2.34 MB,1168x5187,1168:5187,Foreign_Ministry_statement….jpg)

>>19011145

>>19016596

>>19058367

Jacinta Allan, 12 members of the Australia Day Council of South Australia among those sanctioned by Russia

Nabil Al-Nashar - 24 June 2023

Several Australian businessmen, politicians, and journalists are now banned from visiting Russia in the latest sanctions imposed by the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Russia has accused those named of being part of a "Russophobic campaign by the collective West".

Victorian Deputy Premier Jacinta Allan is the most notable politician on the list, which also has South Australian Labor MP Dana Wortley and Liberal Jing Lee.

In response, the deputy premier said her office continued to stand with the Ukrainian community.

"We stand with the people of Ukraine and their families and friends during this difficult time," she said.

"Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine is abhorrent. It breaches international human rights obligations."

The list of names, containing 48 sanctioned individuals, primarily targets high-ranking executives at Australian military contractors.

The Russian government said the sanctions were a response to the "politically motivated sanctions against Russian individuals and legal entities introduced by the Australian government".

Of the 48 people, nine are from Australian engineering firm SYPAQ Systems, including its founder and managing director. SYPAQ provides engineering and technology solutions to the Australian Defence Force.

Sixteen people are from Thales Australia, which has recently been awarded a $160 million contract to build new Bushmaster vehicles for the Australian army.

Those are the same vehicles donated by Australia to support the Ukrainian forces in their war with Russia.

Thales builds Bushmasters in Bendigo, the seat of Deputy Premier Jacinta Allan, who is a well-known supporter of the company.

In addition to eight other names from intelligence software company Nuix, journalists Luke Slattery and Paul Monk from The Australian have also been sanctioned.

More surprisingly were the 12 people from the Australia Day Council of South Australia.

The council, which hosts several annual events around Australia Day, celebrated the Ukrainian community in South Australia, many of whom are refugees fleeing the war with Russia.

A statement published by the Russian Foreign Ministry warned of more potential sanctions.

"Considering that Canberra is not going to give up its anti-Russia course and continues introducing new sanctions, the work on updating the Russian stop list will go on."

Meanwhile, the Commonwealth government is in a stand-off with a Russian diplomat refusing to vacate a plot of land previously earmarked for a new Russian Embassy, in close proximity to parliament house in Canberra.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-23/russia-sanctions-australia-day-council/102518050

https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1890258/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19064589

File: 7d3adea0a292204⋯.jpg (65.04 KB,1024x576,16:9,Ex_priest_David_Edwin_Raps….jpg)

Jailed pedophile priest David Edwin Rapson admits abusing more boys

Ethan James - June 23, 2023

A convicted pedophile and former priest who abused six schoolboys in Victoria has admitted historical sexual crimes against children in Tasmania.

David Edwin Rapson was in 2015 found guilty of sexually abusing boys, aged between 11 and 16, at two Victorian boarding schools in the 1970s and 1980s.

He is serving 12 years and six months behind bars, with a non-parole period of nine years and four months.

Rapson, 69, appeared in the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart on Friday, after pleading guilty to three counts of indecent assault against three boys in the 1980s.

One survivor told the court the sexual abuse destroyed his faith in the Catholic church and people in general.

"(Rapson's) actions caused my family relationships at the time to disintegrate and sent me into self-destructive behaviour, drug addiction, prostitution and petty crime," he said.

He said he has dealt with decades of self-loathing and carrying blame and shame.

Crown prosecutor Elizabeth Avery read the statement of another survivor who said Rapson bought him cigarettes and alcohol.

The survivor said he struggled to maintain relationships, had turned to alcohol to cope and attempted suicide when he found out about Rapson's abuse in Victoria.

"I couldn't forget what Father Rapson had done to me. No matter how hard (I tried) I couldn't get it from my mind," he said.

Rapson, who was charged with the Tasmanian offences in 2019, was extradited to the island state in May after lengthy delays.

Ms Avery said in April 2021 Tasmania's attorney-general wrote to her Victorian counterpart formally requesting a prison transfer.

Ms Avery said her office followed up about 20 times and received various responses including references to COVID-19.

She said the delays caused "significant frustrations" for the survivors in particular.

She said Rapson's offending was a breach of trust at a profound level and that he took advantage of young people for his own gratification.

Rapson is expected to be sentenced on July 6.

Defence lawyer Kim Baumeler argued Rapson should be allowed to serve his sentence in Victoria, where he has family support.

She said he had undergone significant rehabilitation.

Rapson was originally jailed for 13 years in 2013 for the historical Victorian offences, but the Court of Appeal quashed his rape and sexual assault convictions 12 months later.

He was found guilty in three new trials in early 2015.

Lifeline 13 11 14

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

beyondblue 1300 22 4636

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/crime/jailed-pedophile-priest-admits-abusing-more-boys-c-11068696

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19064687

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18855229 (pb)

>>19051159

Former FBI director James Comey speaks on Trump, the mob and his latest book | 7.30

ABC News In-depth

Jun 23, 2023

Former FBI director, James Comey, is a polarising figure in the United States for his role in the 2016 election. Long before that Comey had a storied career as a prosecutor of bullet-proof integrity, including years spent chasing mafia bosses in New York.

Now, he's written a novel based on those battles with the Cosa Nostra. It's called Central Park West and he speaks to 7.30’s Sarah Ferguson.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BF5kp-HMjRc

https://qalerts.pub/?q=comey

https://qalerts.pub/?q=corney

https://qalerts.pub/?q=downer

https://qalerts.pub/?q=crossfire

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19069463

File: 9ec486702e6e893⋯.jpg (73.22 KB,1024x768,4:3,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: dc8d0cde9b9b36b⋯.jpg (87.27 KB,1024x768,4:3,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19031491

Anthony Albanese rejects Peter Dutton’s call to put Voice referendum on ice

CATIE MCLEOD - JUNE 25, 2023

Anthony Albanese has rejected calls from Peter Dutton to put the Indigenous Voice referendum on ice as some opinion polling shows support for the proposal is lagging.

The Prime Minister on Sunday conceded it would “undoubtedly” be a setback for reconciliation if the referendum failed but said “no one ever won an Ashes Test by staying in the sheds”.

“The referendum will be held in the last quarter of this year. Peter Dutton unfortunately has raised a number of issues that he knows, I think, are just not right,” Mr Albanese told Sky News.

“As I said at the Garma Festival a year ago, if not now, when? Federation is 122 years old, it is more than half century since Indigenous Australians were counted in the 1967 referendum.”

Mr Albanese’s comments come a few days after the Opposition Leader delivered a speech in parliament calling on the government to shelve the referendum because it risked failure.

Mr Dutton warned reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians would be harmed if the Voice referendum failed, and called on Mr Albanese to recognise that.

As an alternative, Mr Dutton proposed the government should legislate the Voice, rather than ensuring its permanency by embedding it in the constitution.

He said the referendum question should be changed to simply be about constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians.

“We believe that’s the moment that the Prime Minister should grasp, because the Australian public is not ready to vote for the Voice,” he said on Thursday.

But Mr Albanese on Sunday defended the government’s plan to enshrine the Voice in the Constitution and then using legislation to work out its finer details.

“Of course, the parliament can change legislation at any time affecting the Voice,” he said.

“But what we want to do is to get as much consensus as possible around the structure and the functions and operation of the Voice, including over its composition and the final format.

“But I should imagine over a period of time that will be improved as well.”

Mr Albanese said enshrining the Voice would be well received in history in a similar way to the 2008 Apology to the Stolen Generations.

“If we recognise Indigenous Australians in our Constitution, I think people will look back at it and say, ‘Oh, why didn‘t we do it earlier?’,” Mr Albanese said.

“Just like people say, ‘Why didn’t we make the apology earlier?”

The Coalition has sought to paint the Voice as something that belongs to Mr Albanese or to the Labor Party, but will fail to improve real outcomes for Indigenous people.

However the government maintains the Voice is the form of constitutional recognition Indigenous community leaders asked for in the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart.

Australians will vote sometime in the final three months of the year on whether or not to create the constitutionally-enshrined Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander advisory body.

The Voice would be able to make representations to parliament and the executive government, including federal cabinet and the public service, on matters affecting Indigenous people.

The government says the Voice would not have any veto power or be able to direct funding or programs, with the parliament to retain supremacy and decide how to act on the Voice’s advice.

The government is yet to set a date but the national poll is expected to be held in October, with the respective Yes and No campaigns now beginning to roll out in earnest.

Left-wing advocacy group GetUp is reportedly going to launch its campaign backing the Yes case in Queensland on Sunday, with another event planned for Alice Springs later in the week.

A majority of voters in a majority of states needs to vote Yes if the referendum is to succeed.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/anthony-albanese-rejects-peter-duttons-call-to-put-voice-referendum-on-ice/news-story/0483ce2e8926fb2eacd55120afb23bff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19069501

File: adb3096cf8df8d6⋯.jpg (258.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Taiwan_s_Foreign_Minister_….jpg)

File: 8310c74aaa2cbf2⋯.jpg (2.01 MB,5000x3411,5000:3411,Taiwanese_soldiers_salute_….jpg)

Taiwan calls on Australia to send military attache to Taipei over China threats

WILL GLASGOW - JUNE 25, 2023

1/3

Taiwan’s Foreign Minister has called on Canberra to install a military attache in the Australian Office in Taipei to help the two liberal democracies work together to prevent “the worst from happening” amid sustained threats of war from China.

Foreign Minister Joseph Wu told The Australian that President Tsai Ing-wen’s government wanted Canberra to station a military officer in its de facto embassy in Taipei to liaise with Taiwanese security agencies, as countries including the US, Japan and Singapore have for decades.

“I think it is very important when the Australian government is paying so much more attention to the regional security issues for the two countries to be able to share their observations, their assessment of the situation,” he told The Australian in an exclusive interview in Taipei.

“I know the Australian Office over here has started speaking with our security agencies, and that kind of development is very important.

“It shows that the Australian government has attached great importance to speaking with our security officials … to understand our perspectives on how to prevent the worst from happening. So this is a great step forward.”

Mr Wu said the Taiwanese government also wanted to put a military attache in Taipei’s de facto embassy in Canberra. Taiwan already does this in countries including the US, Japan, India and the Philippines, which all have “One China” policies that officially recognise Beijing while maintaining informal ties with Taipei.

“I think it is very important for us to have somebody who can speak on behalf of the security agencies over here, especially (Taiwan’s) Ministry of National Defence, so that we can have a systematic or institutionalised way of engaging with each other and for information sharing, assessment sharing, things like that,” he said.

“But again, you know, it is up to … the Australian government.”

A source in Canberra familiar with the situation said Taipei was disappointed by the Australian government’s stonewalling of the request. “It’s a long, long point of contention,” said the source, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the extreme sensitivity. “Defence won’t do anything – they subcontract the whole thing to DFAT.”

China puts tremendous pressure on how countries engage with Taiwan, a self-ruled liberal-democracy with which Australia has only had unofficial relations since Gough Whitlam switched recognition to Beijing in 1972. Security ties are particularly sensitive.

Mr Wu – who confirmed that he met Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in 2018 when the then opposition figure led a parliamentary delegation to Taipei – acknowledged exchanging military attaches was a “very subtle issue for the two sides to think about”.

The absence of Australian defence officials in Taipei limits Canberra’s independent information about Taiwan, leaving it reliant on the US and other allies and partners with militaries that communicate directly with the Taiwanese military.

Jenny Bloomfield, Australia’s most senior diplomat in Taipei, has met with Taiwan Defence Minister Chiu Kuo-cheng and other senior Taiwanese security officials. However, the majority of her time is spent on trade, educational and cultural issues.

Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade confirmed the posting of Ms Bloomfield, a former Ambassador to Greece, would end in July, a year earlier than many had expected.

Sources in Taipei said they hoped Ms Bloomfield, a noted linguist, would be replaced by someone more fluent in Indo-Pacific security issues. However, even then they say that will be no substitute for someone who works for Australia’s Defence department, a bureaucratic world away from the Foreign Affairs department.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19069505

File: 6b501d2ab476b23⋯.jpg (509.33 KB,825x987,275:329,JB_1.jpg)

File: 90ec3c20d06885c⋯.jpg (469.59 KB,2048x1568,64:49,FzTNBhmakAU1KRr.jpg)

File: d27237cd9a9ac20⋯.jpg (729.17 KB,825x1471,825:1471,MT_9.jpg)

File: 981f561da379bea⋯.jpg (239.75 KB,1152x1600,18:25,Fxaz4Z1aYAIg6Eg.jpg)

>>19069501

2/3

Taiwan’s access in Canberra is almost non-existent – even as Australia’s military planners become more concerned about Beijing’s plans for the liberal democracy of 24 million people.

Elliott Charng, Taiwan’s longserving de facto Ambassador in Australia, is not allowed to meet any security officials.

Sources familiar with the situation have told The Australian that a recent Taiwanese delegation that included members of Taiwan’s Defence Ministry was unable to secure meetings with the Australian government during a trip to Canberra.

The visiting Taiwanese instead spoke with security-focused Australian academics, researchers and think-tankers – a function of the Australian government’s extreme sensitivity about upsetting Beijing, which has reached acute levels ahead of a planned visit to China by Mr Albanese in October.

A delegation from China’s People’s Liberation Army, by contrast, had a meeting with Australia’s Defence department in Canberra in March.

Canberra’s latest snub comes as Taiwan’s security dialogue with the US has thickened substantially in recent years as Beijing has escalated its military threats.

Mr Wu and Mr Tsai’s top security adviser, Wellington Koo, met in Washington in February with senior figures from the Biden administration, including US assistant secretary of defence for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Ely Ratner, US assistant secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink and National Security Council China director Rush Doshi.

Mr Wu said he would rather “stay quiet” about the discreet annual meeting, which until this year was not publicly acknowledged.

But he said security dialogue between Washington and Taipei was at an unprecedented level.

“We have more senior discussions on security issues, or other issues, than at any time that I have any memory about,” he said.

“And you know, I’ve been in this business for quite a few years.”

In April, the head of Taiwan’s peak intelligence agency revealed that Taipei had partial “real-time” intelligence sharing with the Five Eyes, the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand intelligence network.

Answering questions from legislators in Taiwan’s parliament, National Security Bureau Director-General Tsai Ming-yen said his bureau was sharing intelligence with the Five Eyes – “and in real time” – following an upgrade last year to his agency’s computer equipment.

More than six in 10 Australians (64 per cent) see the prospect of a military conflict between the US and China over Taiwan as a critical threat, according to new polling by the Lowy Institute.

In the event of a Chinese invasion, more than three-quarters (76 per cent) support “imposing economic and diplomatic sanctions on China”, 64 per cent support “Australia sending arms and military supplies to the Taiwanese government”, and 61 per cent support “using the Australian navy to help prevent China from imposing a blockade around Taiwan”.

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin this month said “conflict is neither imminent or inevitable”, rebuffing alarmist recent assessments by senior US military officials and some Australian commentators who have suggested Beijing was preparing for an imminent attack on Taiwan.

Mr Wu said Taipei shared Mr Austin’s assessment.

“It is the same assessment here in Taiwan … The way we see the Chinese preparations is that it is not imminent. And we also think that it can be avoided.”

He said the Tsai government would continue to “work together with other members of the international community, especially with our democratic partners, so that Taiwan can have sufficient self-defence capabilities to deter the Chinese from thinking that they can take Taiwan over very quickly.”

“I think that’s a very good way of deterrence,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19069507

File: ebc153b668dab66⋯.jpg (178.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tony_Abbott_with_Taiwanese….jpg)

File: 908bb2ca207f889⋯.jpg (145.33 KB,1024x767,1024:767,Former_Prime_Minister_Tony….jpg)

>>19069505

3/3

Mr Wu said one of the lessons from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was how interconnected the international economy is.

“The war in Europe is not only limited to the war in Europe. It has a global impact,” he said, pointing to elevated energy prices and food inflation.

Mr Wu said a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would be even more calamitous.

“Half of global container ships sail through this region, and more than 90 per cent of the most advanced semiconductor chips are produced in Taiwan,” he said.

“Imagine the serious global economic impact it will have.”

China’s Defence Minister Li Shangfu this month told an audience of security officials at Singapore’s Shangri-La dialogue that Beijing continued to favour “peaceful unification” with Taiwan, before declaring that Xi Jinping’s government would never “promise to renounce the use of force”.

Mr Wu said Mr Li’s attempt to cast Beijing as a force for peace in the world was “very ironic”.

“It’s like: ‘You submit to me, right, and you will have peace.’ Of course, it doesn’t work that way in the real world.”

Mr Wu – who during the hour-long interview wore a kangaroo pin given to him by a member of the 2018 Australian parliamentary delegation – welcomed Mr Albanese’s recent calls for China to work with the US to establish “guardrails” to avoid a military catastrophe.

“Australia always stresses the importance of regional peace and stability, and also opposes unilateral change of the status quo and, at the same time, supports Taiwan’s international participation,” he said.

“So the Australian government under the leadership of Prime Minister Albanese, his policies towards Taiwan, have been appreciated by the Taiwanese people.”

Mr Wu met with former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in late May during a meeting with Mr Tsai. Mr Turnbull – who was making his first trip to Taiwan – chairs the international advisory council of the Centre for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation, a Taipei-headquartered NGO.

“He said that he will find more opportunities to come back to Taiwan,” Mr Wu said.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott made his first visit to Taiwan in late 2021 when he gave the keynote address at the Yushan Forum, a foreign affairs-focused conference.“Now he stays in touch with me, and he always calls me his good friend,” Mr Wu said.

Taipei is now working on getting Scott Morrison, the third former Coalition prime minister from the Xi era, to visit.

“We will try. We will definitely try,” Mr Wu said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/taiwan-calls-on-australia-to-send-military-attache-to-taipei-over-china-threats/news-story/d3f8799f4143fb14c15e7a25ac1b0647

https://twitter.com/AusOfficeTPE/status/1672186796543991808

https://twitter.com/TurnbullMalcolm/status/1663714914572316673

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19069536

File: 391d1000d15d82a⋯.jpg (276.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Virologist_Shi_Zheng_li_le….jpg)

File: 3743cf1960b2e69⋯.jpg (291.86 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0001.jpg)

File: 4c06c15d23c82cc⋯.jpg (218.47 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0002.jpg)

File: b1bdb528ce68255⋯.jpg (268.72 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0003.jpg)

File: c1b3bc4cd661457⋯.jpg (704.07 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0004.jpg)

>>19011116

>>19011137

China virus researchers were working on defence projects, declassified US intelligence says

SHARRI MARKSON - JUNE 25, 2023

1/3

Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers were working on defensive and biosecurity projects for the Chinese military and were not taking adequate biosafety precautions while handling coronaviruses, intelligence declassified by the United States has confirmed.

The intelligence report on the potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origin of the pandemic was released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence late on Friday US-time, when Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s visit to China had concluded.

The report, which reveals the CIA is unable to determine whether a lab-leak or natural contact with an infected animal spawned the pandemic, was published after Congress voted unanimously to declassify the intelligence.

The findings confirm the reporting of The Australian and the book, What Really Happened in Wuhan, and should silence critics who doubted the Wuhan researchers were experimenting in conjunction with the military using risky genetic engineering techniques on highly-infectious coronaviruses – all the while with lax safety procedures.

The intelligence is divided into three areas; the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s ties to China’s military, the coronavirus research performed at the lab and the researchers who fell ill in the fall of 2019.

The declassified intelligence confirms The Australian’s global exclusive, dated March 2021, that Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers who fell sick with symptoms consistent with Covid-19 in the fall of 2019 were hospitalised.

Intelligence confirms the researchers who fell sick had been conducting research into animal respiratory viruses, but one agency said “we are unable to confirm if any of them handled live viruses in the work they performed prior to falling ill.”

Another unnamed agency cautioned that the symptoms “could have been caused by a number of diseases and some of the symptoms were not consistent with Covid-19” and one researcher may have been hospitalised in this time frame for treatment of a non-respiratory medical condition.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19069537

File: e2404ddc9419336⋯.jpg (369.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Wuhan_researchers_were_exp….jpg)

File: d88768775423318⋯.jpg (631.13 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0005.jpg)

File: c53a14405dc744d⋯.jpg (580.91 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0006.jpg)

File: 5d7e3434d534098⋯.jpg (455.27 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0007.jpg)

File: 20a73c35f2da642⋯.jpg (602.73 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0008.jpg)

>>19069536

2/3

The declassified intelligence states that Wuhan Institute of Virology staff have worked with People’s Liberation Army scientists on coronaviruses, vaccines and for “defensive and biosecurity needs of the military.”

“Information available to the IC indicates that some of the research conducted by the PLA and WIV included work with several viruses, including coronaviruses, but no known viruses that could plausibly be a progenitor of SARS-Cov-2.”

While the intelligence said there was no “known” progenitor to SARS-Cov-2 at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, it’s important to note the laboratory first took steps to delete its virus database in September 2019.

Military ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology was first reported by The Daily Telegraph in May 2020 and then The Australian throughout 2021 in a series of investigative reports.

Prior to the pandemic, Wuhan scientists were conducting “extensive research on coronaviruses, which included animal sampling and genetic analysis”, the report states.

Wuhan researchers have genetically engineered viruses, have created chimeras or combinations of SARS-like coronaviruses through genetic engineering and reverse-cloning techniques, it confirms.

This casts doubt on the claims of the President’s former top coronavirus adviser, Anthony Fauci, that the US was not funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – a revelation first published by The Australian.

In 2019, there were “distinct teams” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology focusing on MERS and SARS-related coronaviruses and both used transgenic mouse models – this means injecting mice with genes to ‘humanise’ it to test whether viruses will infect humans.

The intelligence confirmed the reporting in “What Really Happened in Wuhan”, published September 2021, that there were serious biosafety concerns at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“Some WIV researchers probably did not use adequate biosafety precautions at least some of the time prior to the pandemic in handling SARS-like coronaviruses, increasing the risk of accidental exposure to viruses,” one intel agency states.

Another agency noted there was a “shortage of appropriately trained personnel”, while intelligence also pointed to ageing equipment, a need for additional disinfectant equipment and improvements to ventilation systems.

WIV researchers also performed SARS-like coronavirus experiments in lower-security BSL-2 laboratories, as The Australian revealed two years ago, “despite acknowledgments going back to 2017 of these virus’ ability to directly infect humans through their spike protein and early 2019 warnings of the danger of this practice.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19069540

File: 4d2d89271698efc⋯.jpg (572.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_P4_laboratory_left_on_….jpg)

File: 6da8ee2f6a95bb1⋯.jpg (586.34 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0009.jpg)

File: 2594a40a4d35cb5⋯.jpg (184.98 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0010.jpg)

File: 5d3837ef8922965⋯.pdf (970.26 KB,Report_on_Potential_Links_….pdf)

>>19069537

3/3

The intelligence also reveals that right before the pandemic, in the fall of 2019, the Wuhan researchers planned to conduct analysis of epidemic viruses from pangolin samples and there were suggestions they “sought to isolate live viruses”.

While the report did not address the “merits of the two most likely pandemic origins hypotheses,” it does state that the Department of Energy and the FBI “assess that a laboratory-associated incident was the most likely cause of the first human infection with SARS-Cov-2, although for different reasons.” The reasons are not explained.

The CIA and another unnamed intel agency “remain unable to determine the precise origin of the Covid-19 pandemic, as both hypotheses rely on significant assumptions or face challenges with conflicting reporting”.

And the National Intelligence Council and four other agencies find the pandemic “most likely was caused by natural exposure to an infected animal.”

The agencies have conflicting views on whether SARS-CoV-2 was laboratory-adapted but all assess that it was not developed as a biological weapon.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/china-virus-researchers-were-working-on-defence-projects-declassified-us-intelligence-says/news-story/ca8a36a5f6a21df6362962572cab34b0

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2023/item/2393-odni-releases-report-on-the-potential-links-between-the-wuhan-institute-of-virology-and-the-origin-of-covid-19

https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origins-of-COVID-19-20230623.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075409

File: 270113c6445d5c7⋯.jpg (76.39 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_has_encou….jpg)

File: 68add2925fffa46⋯.jpg (92.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_has_called_on….jpg)

File: 7a577cbeb347c7d⋯.jpg (342.25 KB,815x702,815:702,Voice_to_parliament_1.jpg)

File: 2bb497213ed0985⋯.jpg (323.68 KB,813x643,813:643,Voice_to_parliament_2.jpg)

>>18928670

>>18955149

Albanese at record low approval ratings as No vote overtakes Yes for first time on voice: Newspoll

SIMON BENSON - JUNE 26, 2023

1/2

The referendum to enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government would fail if a vote were held next weekend, with more voters for the first time opposed to altering the ­Constitution to achieve it and a majority of states lined up to ­deliver a “No” vote.

The new blow to the “Yes” campaign comes amid fresh warnings from Anthony Albanese, whose personal approval ratings have also fallen to the lowest level since the election, that a failed referendum would set back the cause of reconciliation.

An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows the referendum on a path to possible defeat, with the “Yes” campaign falling short of achieving the ­double majority test of more than 50 per cent of the national vote and majorities in a majority of states.

The special Newspoll of 2303 voters conducted between June 16 and June 24, coinciding with the referendum bill’s passage through parliament and an intensifying political debate over the remit of the voice, shows the “Yes” vote falling three points to a new low of just 43 per cent.

The “No” vote rose four points to 47 per cent, confirming for the first time that more people are ­opposed to the Albanese government’s referendum model than those who support it.

Just as critical was the shift in the second key test for a referendum to succeed – a majority in a majority of states – with four of the six states now indicating a “No” vote and just two delivering “Yes” vote majorities.

Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania are now poised to vote “No” with only Victoria and NSW likely to deliver majorities for the “Yes” case, according to an aggregated Newspoll of 3852 voters conducted between May 31 and June 24.

The rise in the “No” vote came from Labor voters as well as ­Coalition voters, with Greens supporters alone hardening their views in favour of the voice. But the sharpest fall in support came from 35 to 49-year-old voters, with a seven-point fall among those who support it – from 53 per cent to 44 per cent.

Equally, men have hardened their opposition, with the “Yes” vote sliding from 45 per cent a month ago to just 38 per cent in the latest survey.

The only demographic where the “Yes” vote is above 50 per cent is among those aged between 18 to 34 and university graduates. Women are more likely to vote “Yes” but those supportive still ­remain below 50 per cent.

The state-by-state breakdown shows Victoria remains the strongest state for the “Yes” case, with 48 per cent in favour and 41 per cent opposed, followed by NSW with a 46-41 per cent split in support of the voice but with 13 per cent still undecided – the highest of all states.

Queensland produced the strongest “No” vote with 54 per cent against and 40 per cent in favour. WA also had a majority in the “No” camp – 52 per cent against compared to 39 per cent in support. In Tasmania the “No” vote was 48 per cent compared to 43 per cent for the “Yes” camp and in SA it was almost evenly split, with 46 per cent against and 45 per cent in favour.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075413

File: bbe038ea1380c17⋯.mp4 (3.34 MB,640x360,16:9,The_Voice_support_sinks_to….mp4)

>>19075409

2/2

Voters were asked the question that will be put to them at the referendum: “Australians will decide at a referendum whether to alter the Australian Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you ­approve this proposed alteration?”

The fall in support for the voice comes as Mr Albanese’s personal approval ratings fell to their lowest levels since the election amid a small lift in support for the ­Coalition. Following a fortnight of parliamentary debate focused on the voice and the controversy over the politicisation of sexual assault allegations, satisfaction with Mr Albanese’s performance fell three points to 52 per cent, while those dissatisfied with him rose five points to 42 per cent. This is the worst result for the prime minister since the election.

There was also a tightening of the contest between the two leaders, with the gap narrowing to its tightest margin between Mr Albanese and Peter Dutton on the question of who would make the better prime minister.

Popular support for Labor, however, remained unchanged at 38 per cent. The Coalition’s primary vote rose a point to 35 per cent. This resulted in a slight improvement for the Liberal/Nationals in the two-party-preferred contest, with Labor’s lead cut two points to 54/46 per cent.

The Greens’ primary vote fell a point to 11 per cent while Pauline Hanson’s One Nation remained steady at 6 per cent, as did the 10 per cent vote for other minor parties and independents.

The Prime Minister remained hopeful at the weekend that the numbers would turn around ahead of the voice referendum due to be held between October and December.

Mr Albanese dismissed polling up to this point, arguing that the “Yes” vote until now had exceeded the “No” vote in almost every poll. The latest Newspoll is the first to see the numbers swing the other way.

“Australians will make up their own mind. And I encourage Australians to have a look at the wording that’s put forward, to talk with First Nations people as well,” Mr Albanese said.

“This is a very simple proposition, it’s to recognise Indigenous Australians in our Constitution, in our founding document, and it’s time that we did that. And I believe most Australians will accept that.

“It’s not a complex proposition, it doesn’t change any of the way that we are governed, it just provides for the opportunity for Indigenous people to have a say in matters that affect them.

“And I think that when Australians look at what the actual words are that are being put forward, like when they look at the Uluru Statement from the Heart, they’ll see this for the generous and gracious offer that it is to advance reconciliation.”

The Opposition Leader has called on Mr Albanese to call off the referendum if it looks likely to fail.

“I think the uncertainty and the danger that the Prime Minister is setting our country up for and the division that he’s creating is quite remarkable,” Mr Dutton said last week.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/albanese-at-record-low-approval-ratings-as-no-vote-overtakes-yes-for-first-time-on-voice-newspoll/news-story/a95af8d5f10704ace4610e0e7e0717e6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIvpgc9QyFI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075436

File: e7c46227f8bffc7⋯.jpg (201.58 KB,2048x1536,4:3,The_Prime_Minister_is_pers….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Albanese’s political fortunes hang on voice referendum

The latest Newspoll numbers are unquestionably bad for the voice. Likely worse than expected. But in a double blow, Anthony Albanese certainly wouldn’t have expected Petter Dutton to make ground on him in the preferred PM stakes.

SIMON BENSON - June 25, 2023

Anthony Albanese is now beginning to burn through political capital.

His short-term fortunes are undoubtedly tied to the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum’s success or failure.

And perhaps the Prime Minister’s long-term fortunes as well, depending on the outcome.

The latest Newspoll numbers are unquestionably bad for the voice. Likely worse than expected.

It is the first time the No vote has exceeded the Yes vote. And with only two of the six states showing any sign of a majority, the downward trajectory is continuing.

The only demographics where the Yes vote has managed to stay above 50 per cent is among the youngest voters and university graduates. While also still ahead among women and city folk, it is no longer above 50 per cent.

The largest decline was among 35-49 year olds, a demographic more likely to be feeling the cost-of-living pressures more acutely than others with families to feed and house.

While the Yes vote for these voters is still ahead of the No vote – only just – the swing to the No vote has been most profound within this group.

Whereas a month ago there were clear divisions between the over 50s and younger voters, it is among those in the middle that serious reservations are now starting to appear.

This is a dangerous development for the Yes campaign.

And it is perhaps the starkest reflection of the broader political problem facing the government in securing support for the voice at a time when other issues are occupying the minds of many voters.

It will only intensify Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s calls for Albanese to park the referendum should it appear likely to fail.

But it’s not over yet for the voice. Only the foolhardy would make a call on an election result four months out from polling day.

The government has maintained that it was always going to be the case that it would be won or lost on the strength of the Yes campaign, which is yet to really begin.

But what is now also clear though is that the Prime Minister is personally and politically invested on this issue in the minds of voters.

The fall in approval ratings for the Prime Minister follows two of the messiest weeks the government has had to endure in parliament – dominated by two issues; the voice and the Coalition’s attempts to link Labor to the politicisation of the Brittany Higgins story.

Cost of living and the economy, despite ranking the highest of issues of concern to most people, was consigned to a third-order issue.

It is not surprising that Albanese’s personal numbers have taken a hit given how closely tied he is personally to the referendum debate and how much of parliament has been occupied with these issues.

With 52 per cent satisfied with him as leader and 42 per cent dissatisfied, this is the worst outcome since the election.

Historically speaking, his numbers remain solid but this is the first poll where more than four in 10 voters had a negative view of his performance.

For a leader who thrives on personal approval, the erosion will be of concern.

He certainly wouldn’t have expected Dutton to make ground on him in the preferred prime minister stakes.

What will be puzzling for the opposition is that none of this has yet been transferred to the government. Labor’s primary vote of 38 per cent is steady and proving resilient.

While the poll isn’t great for the voice, it’s no better for the Coalition. While the Liberals/Nationals primary vote lifted a point to 35 per cent, they remain hopelessly unable to shift the electoral dial any a meaningful way.

The question is at what point does the overlap with the voice, should it continue down this path, begin to eat into Labor’s support as well.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/albanese-takes-political-hit-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-newspoll/news-story/dcbb6fa5a15bde6bd7cc2fecb41e785d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075444

File: 26a1c37d3b7152f⋯.jpg (3.24 MB,4032x3024,4:3,A_parcel_of_land_near_Parl….jpg)

File: 27d79ff2fd92159⋯.jpg (222.04 KB,1920x1080,16:9,The_National_Capital_Autho….jpg)

>>19011145

>>19058367

High Court throws out Russia's bid to stop Australian government taking control of embassy site

Elizabeth Byrne - 26 June 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has welcomed the High Court's decision to reject a bid by Russia to prevent the Commonwealth from taking control of a site it leased for a new embassy.

Earlier this month, the federal government rushed through legislation terminating Moscow's tenancy on land adjacent to Parliament House, citing a possible national security risk.

This morning, High Court Justice Jayne Jagot threw out Russia's bid for an injunction, which would have prevented the Commonwealth from entering the disputed land while any court action was underway.

Justice Jagot told the court the law of the parliament had to take precedence while it remained in place.

Mr Albanese urged the Russian government to heed the High Court's advice and leave the site.

"The court has made clear that there is no legal basis for a Russian presence to continue on the site at this time, and we expect the Russian Federation to act in accordance with the court's ruling," Mr Albanese said.

Only one building completed on the site

The Russians took the case to the High Court saying the new law was not constitutional and should be ruled invalid.

But to start with, the Russians wanted an undertaking from the Commonwealth it would not access the site until the main case was determined.

Lawyer Elliot Hyde, who represented Russia, said there was no public or security detriment to Russia remaining on the land for the time being.

Last week, The Australian newspaper revealed that a lone diplomat had refused to leave the site, which currently has only one building erected.

After the High Court threw out the injunction this morning, the man left the site in a diplomatic car.

Documents submitted to the court also revealed that services had yet to be connected to the solitary building on-site.

Mr Hyde had argued that the injunction was needed because his clients feared if Australia took back control of the site, before the main question of the validity of the law was determined, it would have to pull down the building already in place.

The court heard a statement from the Russian ambassador raised concerns he could not be sure the integrity of the land or the building would remain intact.

But lawyer for the Commonwealth Tim Begbie described the claims as extravagant.

"[Russia] is strikingly silent as to what the integrity of the embassy complex means," Mr Begbie said.

"What Russia is trying to protect here is its own national interests."

Justice Jagot found the new law meant there was a radical change in circumstances and Russia's claims were too vague and nebulous to provide evidence of potential damage.

Justice Jagot said Russia's case that the new law was invalid was doubtful.

"I do not perceive the case for invalidity as a strong one," she said.

She went on to cite several heads of power in the constitution supporting the power of the parliament to make the law.

Justice Jagot said overall effect must be given to the act, and the application for an injunction was dismissed.

"There is no proper foundation for the interlocutory injunction as sought by [Russia]," Justice Jagot said.

"The Commonwealth has a clear sovereign interest that the land not be occupied by [Russia]."

But it remains unclear what will happen to the substantial claim that the new law is invalid.

The court was hampered today because lawyers for Russia had been unable to seek instructions about the case.

"Russia has had other things on its mind over the weekend," Mr Begbie said.

Long history of construction delays

The case has a long history, after the lease for the site was first granted in 2008.

Russia had been required to have completed the work within three years under an agreement with the National Capital Authority.

But the embassy cited a dispute with the initial builder, and later COVID-19 lockdowns, for the delays in developing the land.

The National Capital Authority tried to rescind the lease last year on the grounds the covenant had not been met.

But after some Federal Court action and mediation, it was agreed the lease should not be terminated.

That prompted the government to put forward the new law this month, after Mr Albanese cited possible national security concerns.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-26/high-court-throw-out-russia-embassy-site-access-commonwealth/102522722

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075501

File: 8788d4a51c38fc3⋯.mp4 (11.17 MB,640x360,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_announces….mp4)

File: 791fad1d3e61ba7⋯.jpg (1.38 MB,3102x2068,3:2,Australia_has_been_supplyi….jpg)

File: 5b3c7b7aaac5b17⋯.jpg (912.44 KB,3000x2001,1000:667,Volodymyr_Zelenskyy_welcom….jpg)

>>18949906

>>19016940

>>19044137

Australia pledges $110 million in military and humanitarian support for Ukraine's battle against Russia

Stephen Dziedzic and Brett Worthington - 26 June 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced another military support package for Ukraine worth $110 million.

Australia will send a further 70 military vehicles to Ukraine, including 28 armoured vehicles.

It will also send artillery ammunition to Ukraine, and provide $10 million to the United Nations to help meet humanitarian needs in the country in the wake of Russia's invasion.

Australia has already supplied Ukraine with support worth more than $650 million, including through providing Bushmaster armoured personnel carriers, drones and ammunition.

Mr Albanese denied Australia's extra support for Ukraine was in response to an aborted mutiny in Russia at the weekend.

He said Australia had offered additional support for Ukraine around every four months.

In February, on the anniversary of Russia's invasion, Australia pledged drone systems worth $33 million.

Ukraine has repeatedly asked Australia to send retired fighter jets and light armoured Hawkei patrol vehicles.

Hawkeis, like the Bushmasters, are built in Australia.

The latest support does not include either, which Mr Albanese said was based on advice from the Australian Defence Force.

"On Hawkei, I know that has been raised, the advice is that would not be the best way to provide assistance to Ukraine," the prime minister said.

Mr Albanese has dubbed the weekend's events in Russia as a disaster for Russia and its leader Vladimir Putin.

He said it was further evidence that Mr Putin should withdraw from his invasion of Ukraine.

The prime minster said Australia would continue to support Ukraine for as long as needed.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the government expected it to be a protracted conflict in Ukraine.

"We will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes for Ukraine to resolve this conflict on their terms," he said.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who has backed the additional support for Ukraine, said the government should have offered more and sooner.

He said the world had seen the "insanity of President Putin" in the "slaughter" of innocent men, women and children.

Mr Dutton, who was the defence minister when Russia invaded Ukraine, said the government should send the Hawkeis to Kyiv.

"Frankly, [the government] should get on with it and provide that support because if they don't, lives will be lost," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-26/australia-offers-more-support-to-ukraine/102523690

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075534

File: 129f7cd97bf91f9⋯.jpg (63.24 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_at_Supre….jpg)

File: 8278b78d116bfc6⋯.jpg (198.25 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Ben_Roberts_Smith_in_actio….jpg)

>>18934029

>>19016850

War crimes investigators want access to Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case secret file

STEPHEN RICE - JUNE 25, 2023

1/2

Federal investigators are poised to access secret files from Ben Roberts-Smith’s failed defamation case in a development that indicates prosecutors intend to use previously undisclosed evidence from the trial about the killing of unarmed prisoners in a future war crimes trial.

A letter sent by the Australian Government Solicitor on Friday to both sides in the defamation case, seen by The Australian, says the Office of the Special Investigator – the agency set up to investigate war crimes by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan - requires access to the case’s Sensitive Court File.

The OSI’s chief function is to develop briefs of evidence for referral to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.

The highly protected Sensitive Court File contains hundreds of classified documents and photographs, the identities of all the Special Air Service witnesses in the case and transcripts of evidence given in closed sessions of the trial, including by Mr Roberts-Smith himself.

So tight was security around the closed court sessions that all mobile phones and other electronic devices were banned, with documents transported in locked briefcases and high-level security clearances required even for court transcribers.

Any electronic devices containing sensitive documents not returned to the restricted file “are to be destroyed and/or sanitised in accordance with commonwealth requirements”, under the strict security regime.

The OSI’s bid to obtain the files underscores the disastrous consequences of Mr Roberts-Smith’s decision to launch the defamation action, with critical evidence about the conduct of both the Victoria Cross recipient and the SAS witnesses who gave evidence on his behalf opened for scrutiny by investigators and prosecutors.

Earlier this month, judge Anthony Besanko ruled in the Federal Court that Mr Roberts-Smith had committed murders of civilians, including of Ali Jan, a farmer kicked off a cliff in the village of Darwan, and a one-legged man dragged from a tunnel at the compound known as Whiskey 108.

The Government Solicitor says the OSI – which has teamed up with the Australian Federal Police for a new inquiry codenamed Operation Emerald – now requires access to the Sensitive Court File “in order to properly complete its investigations”.

Although much of the evidence in the trial was given in public, access to the Sensitive Court File will provide prosecutors with a wealth of material not previously available under the terms of the original order.

It also allows them to compare testimony given to bodies such as the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force with evidence given in closed court by witnesses in the defamation case, as they look for discrepancies in multiple eye-witness accounts.

At least 50 pages of Justice Besanko’s final judgment had to be delivered in closed court, such were the sensitivities and national security concerns of some evidence. The published judgment contains more than 100 – often obscure - references to evidence given in closed court.

The government’s latest move was predicted by Nine’s lawyers in a 2020 offer to Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers to settle the case, revealed earlier this month by The Australian, warning that the defamation trial would be closely observed by the OSI and the AFP, “in effect providing the prosecution a dry run at prosecuting your client”.

The settlement offer, which would have allowed Mr Roberts-Smith to walk away with only his own costs, was rejected.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075536

File: 224a1ba6a64e14d⋯.jpg (70.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_at_the_S….jpg)

>>19075534

2/2

The Australian Government Solicitor’s letter, sent to MinterEllison partner Peter Bartlett, acting for Nine, and defamation specialist Mark O’Brien, acting for Mr Roberts-Smith, leaves little doubt that the erstwhile war hero and his tight-knit band of comrades-in-arms are the central target of the OSI’s reinvigorated probe.

AGS senior executive lawyer Kristy Alexander notes that “we are instructed that there is overlap between the subject matter of the OSI’s investigations and the subject matter of these proceedings”.

One former SAS soldier and second-in-command to Mr Roberts-Smith, known in court as Person 5, admitted in court that a group of soldiers led by the pair face five murder allegations currently under investigation, including three in other incidents not part of the newspapers’ allegations.

The AGS seeks amendments to orders made at the beginning of the trial under the National Security Information Act, under which highly secret documents and information were required to be placed on the restricted court file.

The OSI has not to date accessed the file, although the AGS says the war crimes agency could arguably already be permitted to do so as an “authorised person” under the statute.

It is likely Nine newspapers will accede to the request, while lawyers for Mr Roberts-Smith are expected to strongly oppose the application.

Any amendments to the existing orders will have to be signed off by Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.

Access to the secret material could be a game-changer for an investigation that has been hit by delays and missteps.

The AGS application comes just a week after it was revealed the five-year AFP inquiry into Mr Roberts-Smith’s alleged involvement in the execution of three Afghan detainees had been abandoned because investigators may have unwittingly used tainted evidence.

The decision by the CDPP not to prosecute Mr Roberts-Smith on evidence gathered during the AFP probe, first reported in Nine newspapers, has led to the formation of a taskforce known as Operation Emerald.

The taskforce comprises detectives from the OSI and a new team of federal police investigators not connected to the abandoned AFP inquiry.

The tainted AFP probe had focused on the two centrepiece allegations in the defamation trial.

One was the alleged execution of two Afghan prisoners found hiding in a secret tunnel at the compound known as Whiskey 108 on Easter Sunday in 2009. The other was the incident in which Mr Roberts-Smith allegedly participated in the murder of farmer Ali Jan in September 2012.

Justice Besanko ruled in the $30m defamation case that the former soldier was, on the balance of probabilities, involved in those killings.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers are currently assessing the prospects of an appeal.

Leading silk Bret Walker SC is understood to be examining the judgment, but most legal experts believe the chances of an appeal succeeding are slim, with the case having been largely decided by Justice Besanko on the “substantial truth” of the allegations, leaving little room to argue mistakes of law.

It is also unclear whether Mr Roberts-Smith’s chief benefactor, billionaire media mogul Kerry Stokes, will be willing to throw more money at the case.

Mr Roberts-Smith has resigned from his position as general manager of Mr Stokes’s Seven Network in Queensland.

In his only comment after the decision, Mr Roberts-Smith said: “It was a terrible result and obviously the incorrect result. We will look at it and consider whether or not we need to file an appeal.

“We just have to work through it and I’ll take the advice as it comes,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/war-crimes-investigators-want-access-to-ben-robertssmith-defamation-case-secret-file/news-story/225dac0c4e118274d9d6aac140a9d9bd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075550

File: 23ef908ac18ed35⋯.jpg (121.23 KB,1136x750,568:375,Marina_Sologub_has_challen….jpg)

File: 7b232ed763fbc8a⋯.jpg (163.86 KB,940x627,940:627,Peter_Tesch_leaves_the_Rus….jpg)

File: dccc23a1c47714c⋯.jpg (1.67 MB,5115x3410,3:2,ASIO_director_general_Mike….jpg)

File: 4c393a268e96f09⋯.jpg (49.14 KB,740x493,740:493,Marina_Sologub_is_in_immig….jpg)

File: bae93d6fe44571b⋯.jpg (153.94 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Sologub_s_husband_Alex_is_….jpg)

‘I never was a spy’: Space consultant denies she’s a national security risk

Nick McKenzie - June 25, 2023

1/2

An Irish space industry consultant detained in Australia after ASIO advised she posed a national security risk had repeated contact with a suspected Russian intelligence officer.

An investigation by this masthead has identified the suspected Russian spy who ASIO has alleged tasked Irish national Marina Sologub with sharing sensitive information she gained by working in the space industry, first in Europe and then in Australia.

In an exclusive interview on 60 Minutes, Sologub responded to the allegations levelled at her privately by ASIO – which refused to comment on her case – that she had been liaising with a suspected Russian intelligence officer who was working under diplomatic cover in Ireland. The officer has left Dublin and now works as a Russian trade official in Serbia.

“He never told me, ‘Marina, I’m Russian intelligence.’ He was the junior guy,” said Sologub, who arrived in Australia in 2020. “I never shared any information with him.”

Sologub also claimed that ASIO had accused her of spying for Russia.

“They came straight away and said, ‘You’re a Russian spy.’ And I said, ‘Please show me the evidence,’ ” said Sologub, who has stridently denied the allegations and is fighting a deportation order issued by Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil based on ASIO’s advice. She has not been charged with any espionage offences.

“I never worked for any spies. I never was a spy. I never transferred any information to anyone.”

In February, this masthead revealed Sologub had been confidentially declared a potential national security threat by the nation’s spy chief, Mike Burgess, leading to the cancellation of her visa more than two years after she travelled with her son and husband from her home in Ireland to Adelaide and attempted to join the local space industry.

The new revelations about her case give a rare insight into the intelligence wars being waged between the West and Russia, and come after the Albanese government cancelled the lease at the site of a proposed second Russian embassy in Canberra.

Former Australian diplomat Peter Tesch, who represented Canberra in Moscow from 2016 to 2019, said Russia was aggressively targeting Australia.

“Russia has certainly been interested in and active in our country for some time,” he said.

“The Russian foreign intelligence services are very capable, highly professional, very well resourced, and of course, their ability to work angles of opportunity is probably unparalleled.”

Sologub, who boasted in her résumé of close ties to the Russian government and who spent months cultivating Australian government and business contacts, has challenged the cancellation of her distinguished talent visa at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

She will remain in immigration detention in Melbourne until her appeal is heard and she is either deported or her visa is reinstated. Government sources said they had no reason to doubt the allegations that Sologub had interacted with Russian intelligence officers in Ireland. The sources said it was likely her appeal would fail and she would be forced to return to Ireland, the country she moved to from Kazakhstan as a teenager.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19075557

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19075550

2/2

Asked by 60 Minutes why ASIO had issued the adverse advice that had landed her in immigration detention, Sologub said: “For nothing. Just because I am speaking Russian language. And that I worked with a Russian agency back in Ireland.”

However, when pressed on her dealings with a suspected Russian intelligence officer when she worked at the National Space Centre in Cork, Sologub said she did have contact with the Russian diplomat outside of work hours between 2011 and 2014.

She also confirmed the man was a Facebook contact, and she had asked him to arrange for her son to have Russian language lessons.

“I have, on my Facebook, I have people from America with whom I worked as well. From Europe, with whom I worked as well. We exchange ‘happy birthdays’, that’s it,” she said.

“This is normal working relationship. It’s not a friend.”

While the intelligence gathered by ASIO about Sologub remains classified and has not been disclosed to her, she described being the subject of ASIO interviews. Sologub’s phone was seized and her house in Adelaide searched.

“The first time they came to me in September [2021]. Then they broke in my house in November. And they confiscated all the stuff from me, all electronic devices, everything.”

Despite the intense ASIO interest in Sologub, there is no suggestion she is linked to the “hive” of suspected Russian spies operating out of Moscow’s diplomatic posts in Australia, whose members have been quietly deported over the past 18 months.

This masthead reported in February that a suspected Russian spy ring in Australia, whose members used their diplomatic status to conduct espionage, was dismantled in an aggressive ASIO investigation.

Information provided by Sologub and government sources suggests ASIO suspects the Irish woman is one of many Western businesspeople, diplomats and officials who Russian spies cultivate to gain access to sensitive information.

Russia has a storied space industry and has previously co-operated with Australia’s key ally, the US, in the space arena, although Washington recently placed sanctions on Russia’s aerospace industry.

Sologub’s application to obtain a distinguished talent visa was signed by a South Australian government official based in London.

It describes how Sologub would contribute to South Australia given her background and because the state “hosts the National Australian Space Agency headquarters, Mission Control Facility, Space Discovery Centre, Defence and Space Landing Pad”.

The visa document also describes how “Marina is an exceptionally organised … [and] is well known globally and have a direct access to the key decision makers in major space agencies”.

After arriving in Australia in September 2020, Sologub worked briefly at a private space industry company, at Deloitte’s Adelaide office and, finally, at a local council.

Her son and husband are living in Adelaide while Sologub contests her visa cancellation.

“I know I’m innocent and I will prove it. If I cannot prove it in Australia, I will go back to Ireland, but I will go to international human rights court and … they will demand everything from ASIO and Australia government,” she told 60 Minutes.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/i-never-was-a-spy-space-consultant-denies-she-s-a-national-security-risk-20230623-p5dj1l.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pca0jySq41s

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

152fb4 No.19079344

General Research #23430 >>19079293

Musk's Twitter Faces Millions In Fines After New 'Disinformation' Laws Released In Australia

Elon Musk’s Twitter and other social media giants face the prospect of billions in fines after the Australian government released new laws targeting “misinformation and disinformation.”

Following a months-long process, Communications Minister Michelle Rowland released the draft legislation that will grant the country’s media regulatory body, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), greater powers to stamp out harmful content online.

“Mis and disinformation sows division within the community, undermines trust, and can threaten public health and safety,” the Labor communications minister said in a statement on June 26.

“This consultation process gives industry and the public the opportunity to have their say on the proposed framework, which aims to strike the right balance between protection from harmful mis and disinformation online and freedom of speech.

The government has pledged that ACMA will not have the power to determine what is “true or false” on individual posts and will have no impact on “professional news content or authorised electoral content.”

New Standards and Penalties

The Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023 introduces a two-tiered system to regulate mis- or disinformation online.

The first tier will see ACMA request social media companies develop a code of practice (industry codes), which will be registered and enforced by ACMA—similar to the telecommunications industry.

A breach of this code will attract significant penalties, including a $2.75 million fine or two percent of global turnover—whichever is greater.

If the code fails, the second tier of regulation will see ACMA itself create and enforce an industry standard (a stronger form of regulation) that will attract even higher penalties of $6.8 million or five percent of global turnover—millions for Twitter and billions for companies like Meta (Facebook).

These laws are meant to strengthen existing voluntary codes developed by the Digital Industry Group.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/musks-twitter-faces-millions-fines-after-new-disinformation-laws-released-australia

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082321

File: 67c75b03bae8f72⋯.jpg (64.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,Labor_Senator_Helen_Polley.jpg)

File: 2fd6615747813c6⋯.jpg (122.11 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Labor_senator_Louise_Pratt.jpg)

File: b254035fc858ab2⋯.jpg (187.67 KB,1280x720,16:9,Graham_Perrett_at_the_Blac….jpg)

File: 7a577cbeb347c7d⋯.jpg (342.25 KB,815x702,815:702,Voice_to_parliament_1.jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

‘No’ campaign starts to spook Labor MPs

SARAH ISON and PAIGE TAYLOR - JUNE 26, 2023

1/2

Labor MPs are warning the push for an Indigenous voice to parliament is faltering and the No ­campaign is outmanoeuvring supporters of constitutional change, as the Yes camp faces growing calls within government ranks to urgently ramp up their operations.

Senior sources said they were getting nervous about the slipping of support and urged for greater campaign activity in coming weeks, including door-knocking, signage and mass mailouts urging people to donate and join the Yes campaign.

It comes as Yes 23 prepares to launch its major day of action this weekend – which will include more than 20 events across the country – in what insiders called a “test” for the campaign to drum up support.

The events will take place in the shadow of this week’s Newspoll showing that for the first time more voters oppose altering the Constitution and the majority of states would return a No vote should the referendum be held this weekend.

Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania all returned a majority No response, with only Victoria and NSW likely to deliver majorities for the Yes case.

Tasmanian Labor senator Helen Polley said that while she ­believed most constituents hadn’t yet “turned their mind” to the ­debate on the voice, she had ­detected a generational divide on the issue and a split between Indigenous groups across the state.

“Certainly it appears from my initial conversations … the Aboriginal community in Tasmania is quite split,” she said.

“I’ve always thought it was going to be a challenge to get it up here, but no one has been campaigning one way or the other thus far so it’s probably too early to tell.

“My concern would be that people over the age of 60 are less likely to support it than those under 40. If I was a betting person, today I’d say it wouldn’t get up here. But I’m hoping with an educational campaign we can change that.”

Senator Polley said some constituents had raised concerns that “this was the beginning of people having more rights than the rest of us”, but that she had been campaigning, particularly on social media, to dispel that myth.

West Australian senator Louise Pratt said she was confident support in her state would grow the closer the referendum drew and that the recent polling should incentivise greater campaign activity.

“I think a bad poll is probably just the thing that people need to go ‘right, we want to do this, let’s go out and fight for it’,” she said.

Anthony Albanese said he was confident in the broad support for the proposed body – which spanned sporting codes, businesses, faith groups and trade unions – and stressed there was still many months before Australians went to the polls.

“The ballot is not this Saturday, simple as that,” he said on Monday. “We have got to explain what it is about, we will continue to do so.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082326

File: d1c0fa190c501aa⋯.jpg (156.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,Labor_leader_Anthony_Alban….jpg)

File: 24f237d1c462567⋯.jpg (76.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,Queensland_MP_Shayne_Neuma….jpg)

File: 919dff93ae7aa4e⋯.jpg (188.27 KB,1280x720,16:9,Aboriginal_Land_Council_of….jpg)

File: 2bb497213ed0985⋯.jpg (323.68 KB,813x643,813:643,Voice_to_parliament_2.jpg)

>>19082321

2/2

Brisbane MP Graham Perrett said while he had received a “very positive” response in some suburbs, including Sherwood, door knocking in places like Graceville had yielded more of a No than a Yes response from residents. “The No (campaign) has been out of the blocks quick and loud, so the Yes campaign has a lot of explaining and groundwork to do,” he said.

“The good thing is we’re motivated and up for it.”

A senior Labor source said support in states like Queensland was lower than they had expected it to be, while another said they ­believed the Yes campaign needed to get more organised. “Where are the signs going up on the yards? Where do you go to buy a shirt? Where are the signs going up in the street? Maybe that’s coming,” they said. “From what I see there are ­embryonic signs of a brilliant campaign here … we’ve just got to get organised.”

A number of MPs were also ­optimistic ahead of what is set to be a busy month of campaigning before parliament returns, with Queensland MP Shayne Neumann stressing that the Yes case could not have begun any sooner given the legislation passed only last week.

NSW MP Jerome Laxale said he had always planned to begin campaigning in July and August and said: “No referendum is easy to win and we’ll all have to work hard to get Yes over the line”.

One Indigenous leader who supported the voice said there was a reluctance to ventilate the Yes campaign‘s shortcomings in case this came across as infighting.

“The stakes are very high and people want to help not hurt the voice‘s chances,” they said.

Another insider said the Yes campaign must do more to highlight the positive and practical change that will flow from informed advice on Indigenous policy and ultimately help close the gap.

This included promoting the Central Land Council‘s very specific requests for the voice to put forward its advice for higher prices on sugary drinks and foods in remote communities where diabetes was rampant, the land council’s call for Aboriginal-controlled remote housing that puts the onus on communities to build, maintain and manage dwellings and a reformed work-for-the-dole scheme for very remote areas where only 35 per cent of Indigenous people aged 25 to 64 have a job.

Currently, the voice supporter said, the No campaign was doing a brilliant job of scaring voters with misinformation and impossible scenarios.

Tasmanian Indigenous leader and a strong voice of the “progressive No” campaign, Michael Mansell, said it was incumbent on Mr Albanese and the Yes campaign to “abandon the referendum” should the polls keep trending downwards, or else see a negative impact on First Nations people across the country.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labor-mps-concerned-at-direction-of-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-support/news-story/e27514612228cd825d6ade523ecffe0e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082358

File: ac633c5e11af4f2⋯.jpg (93.92 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_trade_union_movement_i….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Unions will campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament online and in workplaces

ROSIE LEWIS and SARAH ISON -JUNE 27, 2023

Trade unions – including the union of Indigenous land rights activist Eddie Mabo - are vowing to mobilise their members and actively campaign for a voice to parliament across social media, workplaces, universities and neighbourhoods, amid falling support for the advisory body.

The Rail, Tram and Bus Union, the Electrical Trades Union, the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association and the Transport Workers Union told The Australian they were invested in the campaign and members were being encouraged to engage and advocate during the referendum.

As the Yes camp faces increasing calls from voice supporters to ramp up their operations, National Union of Students president Bailey Riley said student organisations were concerned by polling showing the No vote was ahead and lashed Labor for “dropping the ball” on the reform.

The latest Newspoll, conducted exclusively for The Australian, revealed the referendum would fail if a vote was held next weekend.

“We think the Yes campaign has not done its duty yet and not really kicked off. We think the Labor Party has dropped the ball at the moment. They want this referendum but they don’t seem to be out there supporting it,” Ms Riley said.

“Student organisations are concerned about the polling as well and are thinking ‘why has this not started yet?’ We were going to wait for the Yes campaign to lead the way but at this point in time we’re going to start ourselves and start the campaign from the student perspective.”

The NUS, which represents around one million domestic tertiary education students, is planning weekly stalls run by every student union around the country from the start of semester two in late July or early August and then multiple stalls per week in the six weeks leading up to polling day.

The referendum will be held between October and December, with the most likely date in mid-October.

RTBU national secretary Mark Diamond, representing around 35,000 workers, said the union was talking to members though internal publications and social media, but the movement more broadly had a “huge network” willing to advocate for the voice.

Mr Mabo was a railway workers union member and delegate in Queensland.

“The RTBU, as the union of Eddie Mabo, is proud of its role in advocating for the rights of Indigenous peoples. Our national executive has resolved to support the voice, and we intend to play an active role in the referendum campaign,” Mr Diamond said.

“We are encouraging our members to have conversations with their friends, families and colleagues. For example, we have an article on the referendum written by one of our First Nations members that will feature prominently in the next edition of national member magazine.”

The ETU was developing and distributing online and video resources for its more than 60,000 members as a “strong supporter” of the voice, explaining it would “recognise the special place of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australian history and society”.

“Consultation is a basic principle of democracy and we will campaign stridently for the Yes campaign both among our own membership and in support of the broader trade union campaign,” ETU acting national secretary Michael Wright said.

The TWU was running workshops for its members and said the voice would help build “stronger, fairer communities”.

Peter Dutton on Tuesday attempted to turn the July 15 Fadden by-election in Queensland, which was triggered by the retirement of former Liberal National Party MP Stuart Robert, into a referendum on the voice.

“It’s an opportunity to send the government a message in relation to cost of living, that you’re not happy with the policies that they’ve presided over, and also on the voice, I think there will be a lot of people in Fadden who want to send the Prime Minister a very clear message that they’re not happy with his Canberra voice proposal,” the Opposition Leader said.

“They’re not happy that he’s continuing to keep details from Australians in relation to how the voice will operate.”

Leading Liberal moderate Simon Birmingham, who won’t be campaigning during the referendum and has declined to say how he’ll vote in the ballot box, said he was conflicted on the voice and warned the country had been put in a “very difficult situation”.

Health Minister Mark Butler said a new approach through a voice was needed in his portfolio more than any other policy area he could think of, so that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people could have longer, healthier and happier lives.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/unions-will-campaign-for-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-online-and-in-workplaces/news-story/da0e1f7593b936e293738ca4e26f5b44

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082405

File: 3d40b6f9d0f57fd⋯.jpg (98.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,Taiwanese_Foreign_Minister….jpg)

>>19069501

Taiwan frustrated by Australia’s decade-long trade snub over fears of China

WILL GLASGOW - JUNE 27, 2023

1/2

Taiwan’s government is frustrated by Australia’s refusal to begin trade talks, as Anthony Albanese’s China trip becomes the latest in a litany of reasons given for Canberra’s decade-long snub of its fifth biggest trading partner.

Taiwanese Foreign Minister Joseph Wu said that before President Tsai Ing-wen’s government was elected in 2016, it was told Australia wanted to sign a free-trade agreement with all of its major trading partners.

“After all this (time), Taiwan is the only country of Australia’s major trading partner … that has not had an opportunity to discuss an (economic co-operation agreement) or a (free trade agreement) with Australia,” Foreign Minister Wu told The Australian in an exclusive interview in Taipei.

Australia is on to its fifth prime minister since New Zealand signed a trade agreement with Taiwan in July 2013.

Taipei is now urging the Labor government to do what its Coalition predecessors avoided, with President Tsai’s top foreign affairs adviser suggesting the recently rebooted trade talks between Taiwan and the US could provide the impetus.

“That may be a very good starting point for Australia to think seriously about a trade agreement with Taiwan,” Mr Wu said.

However, multiple sources in Canberra said that Taiwan was likely to be disappointed, at least until after the Prime Minister’s trip to Beijing, which will likely take place in October. They warn the go-slow could last much longer than that.

“Clearly this government is going very slowly and cautiously on Taiwan,” said one, speaking anonymously because of the government’s sensitivity about relations with Taipei.

Asked whether the Albanese government was interested in pursuing a trade agreement with Taiwan, a spokeswoman at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade answered on behalf of Trade Minister Don Farrell.

“Australia and Taiwan continue to explore practical opportunities to deepen our trade and economic relationship through our annual Bilateral Economic Consultations, which are consistent with Australia’s longstanding and bipartisan one China policy,” said the DFAT spokeswoman.

Canberra’s caution is making it something of an outlier among many of its closest allies and partners.

The UK’s Trade Policy Minister Greg Hands visited Taipei for formal meetings last November, but no Australian minister has travelled to Taiwan since the Rudd-Gillard government.

Singapore in November will mark 10 years since it signed a free-trade agreement with Taiwan, another precedent routinely raised by exasperated Taiwanese trade officials.

In another oddity, Canberra asks delegations of sitting Australian politicians not to be photographed with Taiwan’s leaders, a stark contrast to visiting politicians from France, Germany, Canada and other liberal democracies.

Australia also refuses to station a military attache in Australia’s de facto embassy in Taipei, unlike Japan, Singapore, India, the Philippines, the US and other countries.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082407

File: 1334a39de00766e⋯.jpg (431.23 KB,825x863,825:863,JB_2.jpg)

>>19082405

2/2

Defence Minister Richard Marles’ office and the Department of Defence declined to comment on a request from Foreign Minister Wu for Taipei and Canberra to exchange military attaches to better share information.

A Defence spokesman also declined to comment on why the department recently declined to meet a delegation of Taiwanese defence officials in Canberra.

However, The Australian can reveal the visiting Taiwanese met in Canberra with the opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie and Labor’s Peter Khalil, chairman of parliament’s joint committee on intelligence and security, in addition to security-focused academics and think tankers.

Despite the government’s anxiety, corporate Australia is growing ties with Taiwan. LNG, coal and iron ore exports are booming.

Australia’s best known asset manager Macquarie has bankrolled the Formosa wind power project, a key plank in the Tsai government’s policy to increase the amount of renewable energy in its grid.

“It is a big investment,” Foreign Minister Wu told The Australian.

“It is also very important for the international community to see that the Australian investment here in Taiwan is increasing rather than decreasing.

“That shows the Australian confidence in the long term Taiwan security,” he said.

Glenn Lio, the head of the Australian and New Zealand business chamber in Taiwan, called for Canberra to start talks on a formal trade agreement.

“Taiwan is Australia’s 5th largest trading partner. Australia has free trade agreements with 9 of its top 10 global trade partners,” said Mr Lio, ANZCham Taiwan’s executive director, told The Australian.

“We believe it’s time for Australia and Taiwan to step up our partnership by having a formal agreement in place,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/taiwan-frustrated-by-australias-decadelong-trade-snub-over-fears-of-china/news-story/a17afb64524927d1ab2564487271fd72

https://twitter.com/AusOfficeTPE/status/1663417126957510658

https://australia.org.tw/tpei/press_release_Formosa2.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082419

File: bf1334818babaea⋯.jpg (100.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_C_B….jpg)

File: ff4f14df64e78c7⋯.jpg (137.13 KB,1280x720,16:9,Chief_of_Navy_Vice_Admiral….jpg)

>>18960157

US ‘aspirational’ on timing of AUKUS submarines

ADAM CREIGHTON - JUNE 27, 2023

The US navy is “aspirational” about meeting the submarine production targets required to ensure Australia will be able to purchase up to five nuclear-powered Virginia class submarines as promised under the AUKUS security pact.

Admiral Michael Gilday told a seminar in Washington on Monday (Tuesday (AEST)) that it was “too early” to say “precisely where those submarines will come from . whether [from] excess capacity or whether that comes out of US inventory”.

Bottlenecks in US submarine yards have limited the production of US Virginia class submarines to around 1.2 a year in recent years compared with the minimum of two per year required to fulfil the US navy’s own force projection requirements.

“We’re aspirational at this point with respect to reaching the goal of two SSNs a year but all the indicators we have right now is that we are gaining momentum,” Admiral Gilday, chief of US naval operations, said.

“I can‘t give you a specific date when we expect to close on two but we’re headed in the right direction”.

Speaking in March after the three AUKUS leaders revealed greater detail about the landmark agreement first announced in September 2021, Admiral Gilday had said US production would need to “go above 2.0 attack boats a year if we’re going to be in a position to sell any to the Australians”.

Kurt Campbell, Joe Biden’s top adviser for Indo-Pacific matters, said production wasn’t the only problem hobbling the US navy’s own requirements but also the “troublingly large number of submarines that are in dry dock [and needing to get] those back into the water and deployed more quickly”.

Dr Campbell, one of the US officials closest to the negotiation of AUKUS — a wide ranging defence pact that nullified an earlier agreement with France to build 12 diesel powered submarines, said submarines ultimately sold to Australia were not “lost” to the US.

“It sounds like they‘re lost [but] they will be deployed by the closest possible allied force,” he said, speaking alongside Admiral Gilday at a Centre for Strategic and International Studies event.

In March the government said the navy would purchase up to five Virginia class submarines in the early 2030s to replace the ageing Collins Class fleet, ahead of a building a whole new class of attack submarine in the 2040s, dubbed SS AUKUS, in Australian shipyards using US and UK nuclear technology.

The entire submarine program would cost somewhere between $268 billion and $368 billion, it estimated.

Dr Campbell dismissed concerns the administration and congress might drag the chain in approving the regulatory changes required to enable transfer of US nuclear technology to Australia.

“This has been mandated by the President so this is not a ‘whether to’, it‘s a ‘how to’ and I just think sometimes that simple crystallised fact helps quite a lot,” he explained.

As part of AUKUS US submarines, increasingly crewed by Australian and US submariners, would conduct more port visits to Australia including being deployed out of HMAS Stirling near Perth.

The two senior officials also revealed the first Australian submariner students training at the Nuclear Power School in Charleston, South Carolina would graduate in a week’s time.

“All of them are above the mean and not just a couple of them,” Dr Campbell said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/us-aspirational-on-timing-of-aukus-submarines/news-story/edf6c1a6596074740f30ffb584c3eaad

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082436

File: 46ef5d3d405ec09⋯.jpg (747.87 KB,2895x1673,2895:1673,US_officials_say_they_are_….jpg)

File: b83560bec356a12⋯.jpg (238.81 KB,1600x1200,4:3,Kurt_Campbell_says_there_i….jpg)

File: d100c0fd91c6c38⋯.jpg (425.34 KB,2000x1125,16:9,The_first_AUKUS_artificial….jpg)

File: bd9bbd82414a954⋯.jpg (248.76 KB,1600x1200,4:3,Michael_Gilday_says_he_doe….jpg)

>>18960157

>>19082419

AUKUS could expand in second phase to include other countries, US officials say, while challenges remain for nuclear subs delivery

Jade Macmillan - 27 June 2023

1/2

Senior US officials say they are in talks with a "variety" of other countries about potentially involving them in the second phase of the AUKUS agreement.

Australia will obtain nuclear-powered submarines under what's known as Pillar One of the deal with the United States and the United Kingdom.

Pillar Two will see the three nations working more closely together on other types of defence capabilities, such as artificial intelligence and quantum technologies.

White House Indo-Pacific coordinator Kurt Campbell said he expected there would be some areas where other allies and partners could also take part.

"That might be in hypersonics, that could be in cybersecurity, it could be in anti-submarine warfare," he told an event hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington.

"I think the key is going to be … what do you bring to the table, and are you able to do it in such a way that is going to be practical and operational?

"So we're not just looking for theoretical applications and partnerships, but practical, real efforts that will enhance defence capabilities."

The remaining two members of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, Canada and New Zealand, have previously expressed an interest in joining Pillar Two.

Dr Campbell did not name the countries being spoken to but said there were a "variety" of nations interested.

A report recently published by the US Congressional Research Service suggested Congress could consider directing the Defence and State Departments to expand Pillar Two, adding some analysts had argued that Japan should also be included.

"Congress may weigh the potential benefits, such as new members' capability and capacity, against the potential drawbacks," the report said.

"The latter may include the risk of administrative inefficiencies, negative impacts on US firms (e.g. through increased competition with foreign companies for US defence contracts), and geopolitical blowback (i.e. provoking a destabilising response from regional competitors such as China)."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082442

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19082436

2/2

US not 'underestimating' challenges still facing AUKUS plan

Pillar One of the AUKUS agreement will involve Australia purchasing a number of American Virginia-class submarines, before building new subs based on a British design using US technology.

The plan still needs to clear a number of legislative hurdles in the US Congress.

Questions have also been raised about how the Virginia-class submarines will be delivered to Australia, given the pressure US shipbuilders are already facing to produce enough new subs for the US Navy.

"It's too early to give you an answer on precisely where those submarines will come from," US Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Michael Gilday, told the same event.

"Whether that's excess capacity or whether that comes out of US inventory."

Admiral Gilday said the US was ramping up its shipbuilding capacity and that there was close consultation taking place with members of Congress.

"I guess in short, we do not underestimate the difficulties that lie ahead," he said.

China has criticised the AUKUS pact, accusing the three partner countries of travelling "further down the wrong and dangerous path".

Dr Campbell said Australia and the UK had made a "fundamental decision" to strategically align with the US "into the distant future".

"It was not very many years ago that, if you had to make an argument [about] which countries might be prepared to reorient more closely with other countries in the region, like China, Great Britain and Australia were two countries that … flirted with different kinds of orientations," he said.

"And that period has changed fundamentally."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-27/us-officials-say-aukus-deal-may-expand-to-other-countries-and-ai/102527430

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQQIoxGv8lc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082514

File: 9bb36f08f444f48⋯.jpg (60.28 KB,1280x720,16:9,Barry_Cable_has_been_remov….jpg)

File: 9dda696d69bb5f5⋯.jpg (99.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,AFL_CEO_Gillon_McLachlan_a….jpg)

File: c27f64cb4e6110b⋯.jpg (68.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Cable_s_removal_from_the_H….jpg)

>>19044142

>>19016533

AFL Commission officially remove Barry Cable from Hall of Fame

The AFL commission has voted unanimously to officially remove Barry Cable from the Australian Football Hall of Fame, with one of Cable’s alleged victims saying the move has come far too late.

Lauren Wood - June 27, 2023

1/2

The woman who was sexually abused by Barry Cable when she was a child says the AFL’s move to strip the former player and coach of the game’s highest honours has come “25 years too late”.

Former North Melbourne player and coach Cable was on Tuesday immediately removed from the Australian Football Hall of Fame and had his Legend status stripped following harrowing evidence of historical child sexual abuse.

As the league defended its handling of the situation, the AFL commission met on Tuesday afternoon and considered the matter — including a written submission from 79-year-old Cable — before unanimously voting to strip Cable of his football honours.

A recent finding by Judge Mark Herron in the District Court of Western Australia earlier this month found that the ex-North Melbourne coach had sexually assaulted a young girl hundreds of times during his playing career, and raped her in the changerooms at Perth Football Club in August, 1971.

Four further women have made graphic and disturbing allegations of sexual and predatory behaviour toward them as children.

The woman who took her civil case to court said she would continue to deal with the “damage and trauma” that had been inflicted by Cable.

“Today’s decision by the AFL is nearly a quarter of a century late as far as I am concerned,” the woman, known as ZYX, said.

“If the WA Director of Public Prosecutions had charged Cable on the police evidence presented in 1999, he would not have enjoyed another 25 years of fame and respect.

“For decades I and the other women he preyed upon as children have had to deal with the damage and trauma he caused.

“Meanwhile he has been honoured and promoted throughout sport and the wider community.

“He was never a Legend. He was a paedophile and a liar who bullied and abused children.”

Cable, who has denied abusing the women, has never faced criminal charges.

The AFL’s decision came after what AFL chairman Richard Goyder described as “horrific” claims.

“The recent civil case and Judge Herron’s findings make it very clear that as per the rules we enacted at the last commission meeting in terms of the Hall of Fame that this is the appropriate thing to do,” Goyder said.

“Our thoughts are with the woman involved and others who were courageous enough to come forward in the civil action and air the issues that occurred in their lives.

“It’s horrific, and I think it left the AFL with no option to do what we did.

“From what I’ve read, I would commend Judge Herron for the standards of evidence that he required in terms of coming up with his findings, as well. I don’t think there was much doubt in what we read.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19082516

File: 41061f642faeb19⋯.jpg (141.79 KB,768x1024,3:4,BARRY_CABLE_The_purest_exp….jpg)

File: b0d94138f8884c7⋯.jpg (242.21 KB,1200x1511,1200:1511,Barry_Cable_dumped_from_WA….jpg)

File: 121e3f23c002cec⋯.jpg (181.36 KB,1200x1800,2:3,Football_legend_Barry_Cabl….jpg)

>>19082514

2/2

The AFL, North Melbourne and Perth football clubs were last week lashed by the lawyer representing four of the women as “inept and callous” for their silence over the historical sex offences, saying none of the organisations had reached out to the women despite knowing since February of the depraved behaviour.

Michael Magazanik, partner at Rightside Legal which represents the woman, said he was mystified by the AFL’s call to wait until Tuesday – just hours before this year’s Hall of Fame event – to show compassion to the women at the centre of the decades of trauma.

“The AFL has now followed other organisations who have withdrawn Cable’s honours but neither the AFL nor the North Melbourne and Perth clubs have offered any support to these women. The AFL has known for months that one of its coaches molested children while coaching,” Magazanik said.

“Despite the increasing role of women in the leadership of the AFL and its teams, they are sending a terrible message to the women who follow AFL football.”

Goyder and league chief executive Gillon McLachlan defended the AFL’s handling.

“There needs always to be process, and I think you’ve got to wait for a judgment to be handed down and then there needs to be a level of natural process,” McLachlan said.

“Today, the commission has been decisive, strong, and efficient. I think the process has been tight and fast, relatively, but it respected the process of natural justice.”

He said “the women are anonymous” but that the door of AFL headquarters was open to them.

“Our thoughts and sympathies and the horror that they’ve been through is expressed publicly … we respect their anonymity and we’re here if they want to talk,” he said.

“That’s all we can do, I think.”

At the request of the commission, the AFL executive wrote to Cable for a response as to why he shouldn’t be removed from the Hall of Fame.

His response was considered by the commission but Goyder refused to reveal the letter’s contents.

The commission’s recent alteration to its rules to allow exclusion of Hall of Fame members surrounds bringing the game or Hall of Fame into disrepute, if an inductee is charged with an indictable offence, is found guilty of an indictable offence or is “otherwise engaged in conduct which the commission considers is prejudicial to the interests of the AFL”.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-hall-of-fame-2023-afl-commission-officially-remove-barry-cable-from-hall-of-fame/news-story/77332b82474237c3010e99b4a6d6dc42

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087754

File: 40a74587e8c3492⋯.jpg (83.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_has_sent_a_le….jpg)

File: 5145c36ba74d3e2⋯.jpg (129.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ken_Wyatt_the_first_Indige….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Peter Dutton sends six-page brochure to constituents outlining No case against the Indigenous voice to parliament

ROSIE LEWIS and PAUL GARVEY - JUNE 28, 2023

Peter Dutton says the High Court will determine the powers of the voice, not the parliament, and Australia will be “stuck with negative consequences” if the referendum succeeds, in an extensive brochure showcasing the central arguments of his No campaign.

A six-page pamphlet was sent to residents in the Opposition Leader’s marginal Queensland electorate of Dickson within the past fortnight, which was delivered with a letter from Mr Dutton that states: “The government has overlooked the concerns of many legal experts. It is pursuing a voice that covers all areas of ‘executive government’ … Many legal experts warn this voice could risk years of litigation. The High Court would determine its powers, not the parliament.

“This voice is legally risky, with unknown consequences. It’s divisive and permanent. Yet when Australians raise reasonable concerns, they’ve been dismissed.”

Mr Dutton holds Dickson on 1.7 per cent and has tried to turn next month’s Fadden by-election, which the Liberal National Party is widely expected to win, into a mini-referendum on the voice.

The Queensland Independent Remuneration Tribunal has ruled state MPs can’t produce material about the voice referendum using their electorate and communication allowance.

Yes supporters conceded federal MPs using public funds for big electoral mailouts in Queensland – the staunchest No state so far, according to Newspoll – would not help their case.

Ken Wyatt, the first Indigenous cabinet minister who quit the Liberal Party over its stand on the voice, blasted the “mindless commentary” coming from his former colleagues and said they needed to start using common sense on how the advisory body would work.

He said the Yes camp needed to explain why Aboriginal people wanted a constitutionally enshrined voice, as he lashed some of the Coalition’s parliamentary questioning last week on what would and wouldn’t fit within its remit.

“I saw some of the questions at question time. I have never known of any Aboriginal group to ever want to talk to the RBA about ­interest rates. I’ve never known of them to want to talk to Defence about defence expenditure. I just found the questions childish,” Mr Wyatt said.

“The intent was just to have guaranteed structures for a voice and to fight for the things that are part of Closing the Gap, so that there’s a better outcome in life ­opportunities, longevity, and a focus on improving in areas of education, wealth creation, incarceration rates.

“It’s about everyday fundamental things, it’s not about what the Coalition has been banging on about in the chamber.”

The subheadings of the Dickson brochure, which was funded using Mr Dutton’s electorate printing and communications budget, include: “risky’”, “unknown”, “divisive”, “ineffective”, “costly” and “permanent”.

“The Liberal Party supports ­regional voices, with powers clearly defined by parliament,” the brochure says. “However, the Albanese government wants to go much ­further – enshrining a voice in the Constitution, with few limits to its scope and few details.”

Yes23 declined to respond to the brochure’s claims without having seen the document.

Mr Wyatt said the No camp commentary would be viewed similarly to the debate about the 1992 Mabo High Court decision.

“I know there was a premier who said ‘there goes our back yards’ because of the Mabo High Court decision. Nobody in Australia ever lost their backyard. What it did was set out a parameter as to how mining companies would work with Indigenous Australians,” Mr Wyatt said.

Age Discrimination Commissioner Kay Patterson on Wednesday criticised a lack of process to achieve bipartisanship in the lead-up to the referendum.

She told the National Press Club that the highest human rights order was that the debate was dignified and respectful, and people weren’t called names like “racist” or lambasted from one side or the other.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/peter-dutton-sends-sixpage-brochure-to-constituents-outlining-no-case-against-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/9f312d8d656280d726e49f4b904868c8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087765

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles landing in Solomon Islands for talks on the future of Australia's defence presence

Stephen Dziedzic - 28 June 2023

1/2

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has suggested Australian troops and police might stay in Solomon Islands beyond this year, in a sign the federal government could push for an enduring security presence in the Pacific Island nation.

Mr Marles will land in the country's capital Honiara later today for a two-day visit, where he'll hold talks with Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare and meet Australian police and soldiers deployed there.

Both Australian Defence Force and Australian Federal Police personnel were sent to Honiara in late 2021, when Mr Sogavare asked for help to restore order after major riots broke out.

At the time the Morrison Government insisted that it would be a short-term deployment, dismissing comparisons to the 14-year long Australian led RAMSI mission to stabilise Solomon Islands when it was wracked by escalating violence in 2003.

But in March last year both countries agreed to keep some Australian police and soldiers in the country until December 2023 as part of the Solomon International Assistance Force – which also includes personnel from New Zealand and Fiji.

That will keep the Australian contingent in place for the Pacific Games in November, which will bring thousands of people to Honiara and are likely to place a strain on the country's security forces.

And on Tuesday Mr Marles suggested that Australia might seek agreement from the Solomon Islands government to keep its personnel there well beyond 2023.

"I think we will see them through to the Pacific Games, and obviously we are very focused on the role they are playing within Solomon Islands," the Deputy Prime Minister told the ABC.

"So we will talk with the (Solomon Islands) government about their ongoing utility and ways they could provide support."

The Defence Minister also stressed that Australia wanted to maintain "long term" security assistance for Solomon Islands.

"The point I'd make is that we see our engagement in the Pacific is measured over the long term. And being the best partner we can be to the Solomon Islands is making sure we are there over the journey," he said.

"And it's really that philosophy which is going to underpin this deployment but also the other ways we engage with Solomon Islands and its government."

Several defence personnel and 25 Australian Federal Police are currently deployed with the SIAF, while another 35 AFP officers are in Solomon Islands offering direct assistance to the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force (RSIPF)

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087768

File: ea5f4c5bf1008c8⋯.jpg (1.63 MB,3333x5000,3333:5000,In_2022_both_Australia_and….jpg)

File: 934fe486e4b05c1⋯.jpg (1.56 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Solomon_Islands_Prime_Mini….jpg)

>>19087765

2/2

Australia signalling commitment?

Anna Powles from Massey University told the ABC that Mr Marles might be taking the opportunity to "do some early signalling that Australia is open to an ongoing commitment to Solomon Islands".

It's not clear if Solomon Islands would accept such an offer.

Dr Powles said the government's decision would likely be "determined by what the mission mandate would be" but that Mr Sogavare might well be keen for additional security support to help with elections next year.

"2024 may prove to be a challenging year with the delayed elections due to take place and the provision of additional security may be welcomed," she said.

The Defence Minister's comments also come against the backdrop of the continuing contest between Australia and China for influence in Solomon Islands.

Beijing signed a deeply contentious security pact with Honiara in April last year and has been rapidly expanding its police cooperation program since then.

Last year China's government supplied dozens of motorbikes and two water cannon trucks to the RSIPF, well as expanding training programs for local police both in China and across multiple provinces in Solomon Islands.

Australia also gifted police vehicles and handed over 60 semi-automatic rifles to Solomon Islands police, and has repeatedly declared it wants to be the Pacific country's main security partner.

Multiple senior Australian officials have also made it clear they're uneasy about China's deepening involvement with Solomon Islands law enforcement agencies, suggesting it might be deeply destabilising.

Dr Powles told the ABC that if Chinese police contingents were invited into Solomon Islands in the future it could create significant risks, particularly if there was an enduring Australian police presence in the country.

"If there are multiple police forces operating in Solomon Islands — particularly those with distinct command and control — it will be critical to ensure communication lines and even a crisis hotline are put in place to reduce and manage any potential friction between the forces," she said.

Mr Marles told the ABC that the relationship between Solomon Islands and Australia was both "enduring" and "improving" and that "security within the Pacific should emanate from the Pacific family first."

He also said he would use his visit to Solomon Islands to build economic links and ensure Australia's development program was delivering what people needed in Solomon Islands.

"We'll continue to focus on the way Australia can contribute to Solomon Islands development … our focus needs to be on improving the development outcomes of all countries around the Pacific," he said.

"And I'll look forward to having discussions with Mr Sogavare on how we can best improve that."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-28/richard-marles-solomon-islands-security-future/102532950

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWEeNB73IXI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087791

File: e07c23b91fbecd0⋯.jpg (1.21 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Elly_Sapper_told_the_court….jpg)

File: ec56b647ed59fe7⋯.jpg (285.95 KB,1754x1240,877:620,Malka_Leifer_was_convicted….jpg)

File: 8c64d97f8339925⋯.jpg (425.95 KB,3000x1657,3000:1657,Sisters_Nicole_Meyer_Elly_….jpg)

>>18755037 (pb)

Victim of former principal Malka Leifer reveals she lost baby during sexual-abuse trial

Elise Kinsella - 28 June 2023

1/2

A Melbourne court has heard one of convicted paedophile Malka Leifer's victims lost her baby during the trial.

WARNING: This story contains details some readers will find distressing.

In April, Leifer was convicted in the County Court of Victoria of 18 offences, including rape and child sexual assault crimes.

She was a principal at the Adass Israel School in Melbourne's south-east in the early 2000s when she was accused of abusing three sisters.

She was convicted of abusing two of the sisters, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich, when they were teenagers.

The sisters read victim impact statements today during a plea hearing in the County Court.

The pair stood at a lectern facing a screen that showed Leifer via videolink.

Leifer intently watched the sisters speak as she sat in custody in a white room, wearing a blue jumper.

Ms Sapper told the court she had been pregnant during the trial in April.

She said while she had to be "torn apart on the stand" as she gave evidence, her child had been like a light, giving her strength.

"It gave me the courage and strength to face every day in court," she said.

But she said her baby did not survive the trial.

"Six days before the verdict we lost our little girl, her heart stopped beating," she said.

Ms Sapper said she would never know if the stress and trauma of Leifer's abuse and trial had contributed to the loss of her daughter.

"She abused me and I am forced to inherit the consequences for the rest of my life," Ms Sapper told the courtroom, where people could be seen crying.

Victim suffers nightmares 'every single night'

Ms Sapper's husband Daniel Lichter also spoke, explaining how the sexual abuse had impacted their marriage and his wife's adult life.

He said early in their relationship, he saw his wife's "natural character was loving and caring" but there would be periods where she struggled with her emotions and he didn't understand why.

He said over time she slowly let him in on the past abuse she had suffered.

Dr Lichter said it was important the court understood the context in which the abuse had occurred.

"As a child, Elle did have a hole in her heart – a space that is normally filled by a mother," he said.

He told the court Ms Sapper had not felt love before Leifer preyed upon her.

"To Elle, the abuse was an extension of being well behaved so she could experience the love that was being falsely displayed to her," he said.

He said that betrayal of trust had had lifelong impacts on his wife's mental health.

"Elle never switches off, she has nightmares of Leifer abusing her every single night," he said.

Dr Lichter said when something triggered panic in his wife, he could not touch her or hold her because it worsened her experience.

He said there were days when she was unable to leave bed for work or to be a mother, because her panic was so overwhelming.

The court heard the couple concentrated on trying to string together good days.

"I am in awe of her strength and courage every day," Dr Lichter said of his wife.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087797

File: 89bd1cd7c378995⋯.jpg (1.99 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Sisters_Elly_Sapper_Nicole….jpg)

File: 652d804fd96b30e⋯.jpg (479.84 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Malka_Leifer_s_lawyer_said….jpg)

File: 12bdd3f766c87a3⋯.jpg (239.46 KB,1188x657,132:73,Support_is_available_2023.jpg)

>>19087791

2/2

'Magnitude' of Leifer's impact left sisters 'utterly broken'

Ms Sapper described the 18 years of trauma she had experienced since Leifer sexually abused her.

She said she had experienced panic attacks, nightmares and flashbacks throughout her life and had stays in hospital and had been treated with many different medications to try and reduce the impacts of her trauma.

"It was a betrayal of such magnitude it left me utterly broken," she said.

But she said she "refused to let the broken fragments within me define me entirely".

Her sister also detailed the lifelong consequences of Leifer's sexual abuse.

"'I love you like a mother,' she whispered to me the first time she touched me under my clothes," Ms Erlich said.

She said this abuse "fractured my ability to trust forever".

Ms Erlich said she had since suffered from feelings of shame that had led to self-harm.

"Her abuse still lives within my body, in some ways her trauma will always live within my body," she told the court.

"The abuse I suffered did not make me stronger, it left me a traumatised adult."

She said experiencing sexual abuse at a young age had set her up for future harm and had led to an adult life of physical pain.

She detailed the migraines, nerve pain and chronic illnesses she had experienced since Leifer's sexual abuse and the hospital stays to treat her mental health.

"The abuse has forced me numerous times to choose between life and death," she told the court.

Ms Erlich said she sometimes dreamt of what her life would have been if she had not suffered sexual abuse.

She finished by telling Leifer: "I am so much more than the limitations you chose to impose on me."

Leifer 'lonely' and 'broken' in prison, lawyer says

Leifer's barrister, Ian Hill, told the court his client had a history of depression and hallucinations and said she had been treated for depression with psychotic features.

He said depression meant the "burden of imprisonment weighs more heavily on her".

Mr Hill told the court his client had been separated from her family, including her husband, eight children and 17 grandchildren who all live abroad.

"When one thinks of the magnitude of 17 grandchildren and the celebrations and events by way of birthdays, weddings and other matters that she is missing out on, one appreciates the enormity of her position," he said.

Mr Hill also said Leifer understood her elderly mother may not be alive by the time she was released from prison.

The barrister asked the court to take into consideration his client's time in home detention in Israel, and her time in custody, while sentencing her.

He said she had been separated from her culture and religions as the state's only Jewish woman in custody.

"She is a truly lonely and isolated and broken woman," he said.

"Held in protective custody in a maximum-security prison far from her culture, far from her religion and significantly far from her family."

He said Leifer had access to an allowance of $220 per month but could not spend that money because there was not any kosher food at the prison canteen.

In his address, Mr Hill also asked the judge to consider the level of publicity the case had attracted around the world.

"She has been really exposed by the media to a worldwide audience in somewhat sensational terms," he said.

The hearing continues.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-28/court-malka-leifer-plea-hearing-victim-loses-baby/102535814

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087815

File: 6025faa049294f6⋯.jpg (150.61 KB,1754x987,1754:987,Malka_Leifer_was_found_gui….jpg)

File: 20a19e527e4d723⋯.jpg (430.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sisters_Elly_Sapper_Dassi_….jpg)

>>18755037 (pb)

>>19087791

Malka Leifer: Impact of principal’s abuse laid bare as sisters share their stories

A former school principal is “lonely, isolated and broken” in prison after a jury found her guilty of the horrific sexual abuse of two sisters.

Liam Beatty - June 28, 2023

1/2

Former Jewish school principal Malka Leifer is “lonely, isolated and broken” inside prison following her conviction for sexually abusing two students.

Leifer, 56, returned before the County Court of Victoria on Tuesday for a pre-sentence hearing after a jury found her guilty on 18 sexual abuse charges in April.

Shortly after midday, her barrister, Ian Hill KC, told the court his client had fallen from being a respected educator and community leader to a “shadow of her former self”.

The former religious teacher and principal of Adass Israel School in Melbourne was convicted of sexually abusing two women while they were students and junior religious teachers following a two-month trial earlier this year.

“Leifer then was a respected educator, administrator and community member and indeed community leader,” Mr Hill said.

“Today all these years later she is a truly lonely, isolated and broken woman held in protective custody in a maximum-security prison far from her culture, far from her religion and, significantly, far from her family.

“Publicly she has been disgraced and it can be said fairly that she is suffering worldwide … as a result of the publicity that this trial seems to have attracted.”

The former trusted leader within Melbourne’s ultra-orthodox Jewish community appeared remotely, wearing a baggy blue prison jumper.

Earlier, she remained still and expressionless as sisters Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper read victim impact statements to the court.

Ms Erlich told the packed court she trusted the powerful school community leader “completely” which had now left her feeling like a broken and traumatised adult.

“I remember the first time Malka Leifer told me she cared, I was 16-years-old,” she said.

“‘I love you like a mother’, she told me.

“Malka Leifer you shattered my trust and stole my body and altered my life trajectory, but you could not take my spirit. Today I stand as a survivor.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087818

File: c5b7bac89671571⋯.jpg (87.63 KB,1731x974,1731:974,Leifer_worked_at_the_Adass….jpg)

>>19087815

2/2

Leifer had initially been committed to stand trial on 29 charges, but was acquitted on nine allegations including those put forward by their older sister Nicole Meyer.

The verdicts relate to incidents that occurred between 2004 and 2007 on school trips, during private education sessions at Leifer’s Elsternwick home, and backstage of a school play being performed at the Phoenix Theatre.

Ms Leifer, an Israeli teacher brought over to head religious studies at the Adass Israel School in 2001, had always maintained she was innocent and returned to Israel in 2008 as allegations first emerged.

Ms Erlich, now 35, told the court her legacy of denial and efforts to evade justice had forced her to relive the trauma for most of her adult life.

The violation of my body, forever alters the way I am able to give and receive trust,” she said.

“I often wonder, does she take pride … I believe she does, I see no remorse.

“Your darkness could not destroy me. I am so much more than the limitations you chose to impart on me.”

Her younger sister, Ms Sapper, now 34, revealed she had lost a pregnancy just days before the verdicts were delivered, saying she did not know if the stress of the trial led to the loss of her baby.

“Her heart stopped beating … there were no abnormalities,” she said.

“I will never know if the trauma played a part.”

She told the court she was tired of being a victim.

“She abused me and I am forced to inherit its pain and consequences for the rest of my life,” she said.

“I refuse to let the broken fragments within me define me entirely … Every day forward I will learn to be more free, to laugh, to cry and to love with an open and genuine heart.”

Leifer, the court was told, had now spent about 5½ years in custody across Australia and Israel, which Mr Hill said had a “clear” impact on her mental health.

“She chooses to spend the day in her cell with the door locked from the inside,” he said.

Referencing a letter written by an old colleague, Malki Fixler, who had visited Leifer in prison, he said she was fearful and believed “the guards want to kill her”.

“Every loud noise gets her body shaking,” he said.

The court was told the mother of eight has no intention of staying in Australia when released from prison, with authorities planning to deport her.

The hearing, before Judge Mark Gamble, will continue on Thursday.

https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/malka-leifer-impact-of-principals-abuse-laid-bare-as-sisters-share-their-stories/news-story/aabe3c113ff727b333fa009f7b9f0253

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087825

File: 770c06ae7bc557b⋯.jpg (91.49 KB,800x600,4:3,Elly_Sapper_L_and_Dassi_Er….jpg)

>>18755037 (pb)

>>19087791

Sisters fight darkness after Orthodox principal's abuse

Karen Sweeney - June 28 2023

Sisters sexually abused by once revered ultra-Orthodox Jewish principal Malka Leifer refuse to be swallowed by the darkness of what happened to them.

Elly Sapper yearned for love and Leifer was the first person to tell her she was loved.

Her sister Dassi Erlich recalls the moment Leifer told her she loved her like a mother.

It wasn't genuine love but a manipulation that led to years of sexual abuse and trauma.

"Faced with the painful truth that her love wasn't real was a betrayal of such magnitude it left me broken," Ms Sapper told Leifer at a pre-sentence hearing in the Victorian County Court on Wednesday.

Leifer, the former principal and head of religion at the Adass Israel School, was convicted in April of sexually abusing Ms Sapper and Ms Erlich when they were students between 2003 and 2007.

A jury of six men and six women found her guilty of 18 charges including rape, indecent assault and sexual penetration of a child aged 16 or 17.

The 56-year-old mother of eight was acquitted of nine charges, including five against the siblings' older sister Nicole Meyer.

Leifer, who fled to Israel when allegations were raised in 2014 and was extradited back to Australia in 2020, appeared by videolink from prison.

Ms Sapper struggled to quantify the impact of the abuse but said she refused to let the broken fragments of herself define her entirely.

She was pregnant when she gave evidence during Leifer's weeks-long trial and described her daughter as the light in the darkness after years of trying to get pregnant and many pregnancy losses.

She knew she needed to be strong because she carried a future life.

"Six days before the verdict we lost our little girl - her heart stopped beating," she said.

Without concrete answers as to why she'll never know if the stress, anxiety and trauma contributed.

Her husband Daniel Lichter said he was in awe of of her strength and courage, and the exhaustion she experiences trying to overcome nightmares and panic attacks.

"In these moments I cannot touch or hold her because it worsens her experience," he said.

"I can only provide a safe space and watch her painfully navigate her way through and accept that the hug she desires has been turned into an instrument of torture."

Ms Erlich believed Leifer was a source of safety but instead was subjected to insidious abuse that fractured her trust forever.

She believed Leifer takes pride in knowing she irreversibly altered her existence and saw no signs of remorse in Wednesday's hearing.

Ms Erlich told Leifer her darkness would not define her.

"Instead I choose to focus on the light," she said.

"I am resilient, I am powerful and I am so much more than the limitations you chose to impose on me."

Ms Meyer was unable to speak inside court because of the not guilty verdicts but outside said the trauma did not simply vanish because of the jury's findings.

"I stand here today not just for myself but to speak for the countless survivors who endure this battle silently, their voices silenced by a legal system that often falls short of delivering justice," she said.

Leifer's barrister Ian Hill KC said his client was once a respected educator, administrator and community leader but is now lonely, isolated and broken.

"Publicly she has been disgraced," he said.

"It can be said, fairly, that she is suffering worldwide opprobrium as a result of the publicity this trial seems to have affected."

Leifer, whose husband, children and grandchildren are all overseas, is expected to serve the full amount of any sentence she receives before being deported, the court heard.

Judge Mark Gamble noted Leifer has no interest in remaining in Australia.

The hearing continues on Thursday.

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service (1800 211 028)

https://fullstop.org.au/get-help/our-services

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8250600/sisters-fight-darkness-after-orthodox-principals-abuse/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2d4a93 No.19087826

Hope Aussies won't mind this here. US board is non-existent at the moment.

https://twitter.com/TexasLindsay_/status/1673918734711377923

‘Malaria cases discovered in Florida and Texas for the first local spread in 20 years’

It just so happens these are the two states that allowed billions of Bill Gates’ funded GMO mosquitos to be released in recent years.

Entire thread is worth the read.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087827

File: 032c171d42cd350⋯.jpg (299.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sisters_Elly_Sapper_Nicole….jpg)

>>18755037 (pb)

>>19087791

‘Echoes of trauma’ as Malka Leifer victims detail impact statements in court

ANGELICA SNOWDEN - JUNE 28, 2023

Persistent nightmares. Crippling mental health fallout. Possibly a lost pregnancy.

These are three of many consequences Malka Leifer’s sexual abuse victims say her offending and criminal trial has had on their lives during impact statements given to Victoria’s County Court on the first day of the former principal’s plea hearing.

Leifer, 56, watched remotely from a room in the Dame Phyllis Frost prison as sisters Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich delivered summaries of the way her abuse had cast a shadow over their lives, including their relationships, mental health and ability to work.

Ms Sapper revealed that six days before Leifer’s guilty verdicts, she was pregnant but lost her baby.

“I have had to fight sitting here in court while being cross-examined and torn apart on the stand knowing I was pregnant after years of trying and many pregnancy losses,” she said.

“Six days before the verdict, we lost our little girl. Her heart stopped beating.

“There were no concrete answers, no abnormalities. I will never know if the stress, worry and anxiety … played any part in the loss of my little girl.”

In the packed courtroom, friends and family could be heard crying.

Ms Sapper’s husband, Daniel Lichter, also gave a victim impact statement, telling the court: “She and I have adjusted our lives to give her the best chance at stringing a series of good days together.

“We hope over time that the string of good days will get longer and longer.”

Leifer was found guilty by a jury of eight offences against Ms Sapper, including rape.

Ms Sapper’s sister, Ms Erlich, told the court Leifer “stole her body” after a jury found the ex-Adass Israel School teacher guilty of nine charges relating to her, including rape, indecent assault and sexual penetration of a 16 or 17-year-old.

“My body without warning is gripped by the memory of what she did. And then in the middle of the carpark I am standing there shaking,” she said. “Or struggling to break free of terrifying sleep paralysis in the middle of the night.

“She became an architect of my pain, during the day and in my sleep.”

Ms Erlich, who said she has suffered from eating disorders and depression, was not “stronger” because of Leifer’s abuse and was hospitalised during the trial.

“Her abuse has forced me numerous times to choose between life and death. And each time I chose life,” she said. “The impact of the harm Malka Leifer had on me has exacted a major toll on my mental wellbeing, financial security, employment prospects and educational pursuits.”

Ms Sapper and Ms Erlich’s sister Nicole Meyer also delivered a victim impact statement outside of court after the jury had acquitted Leifer of allegations made by her.

“The scars both visible and invisible persist, no matter the verdict delivered by a jury,” she said.

“Her manipulation, control and violation of my body and mind has had profound and devastating consequences in shaping the person I have become. The physical impact remained long after the abuse and continues to be present, with chronic pain, eating disorders and sleeping issues and PTSD.”

The court heard the maximum sentence for rape charges was 25 years, for sexual penetration of a 16 or 17-year-old 10 years and for indecent assault 10 years.

Ms Leifer’s barrister, Ian Hill KC, urged presiding judge Mark Gamble to consider the hurt Leifer was experiencing as a result of the distance from her family and isolation from her religious life.

Leifer has spent a little more than five years in custody already, and when she becomes eligible for parole she will be immediately placed in immigration detention as she no longer has a visa.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/echoes-of-trauma-as-malka-leifer-victims-detail-impact-statements-in-court/news-story/f05c449808a849ccb81e0f9cfd4fd357

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2d4a93 No.19087828

>>19087826

>board

Sorry "bread".

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

05d48d No.19087829

File: bda4a464c965b2f⋯.png (133.63 KB,574x798,41:57,Q_133_satan.png)

no bounds

Does Satan Exist?

Does the 'thought' of Satan exist?

Why would Q word this question in this manner?

You know the Answer.

Why would an anon tell you this?

You know the Answer!

Always and Forever…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

07ecd7 No.19087841

File: e5814acda4ac0e3⋯.png (141.15 KB,703x695,703:695,Screen_Shot_2023_06_28_at_….png)

File: ab32c3569a6680f⋯.png (135.71 KB,805x746,805:746,Screen_Shot_2023_06_28_at_….png)

File: 53c4ba70dcbd25d⋯.png (214.64 KB,710x814,355:407,Screen_Shot_2023_06_28_at_….png)

File: aa5c1e793656d4a⋯.png (277.85 KB,786x785,786:785,Screen_Shot_2023_06_28_at_….png)

Who is Nicola Bulley and why is the media engaging in a blitz to make you believe her death was accidental?

Anon has no idea what this story is about. But anon knows that when the media is in lockstep, there is likely fvckery afoot.

Consider digging.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087883

File: 57fbf6857d1605e⋯.mp4 (15.86 MB,640x360,16:9,Sisters_abused_by_ultra_Or….mp4)

>>18755037 (pb)

>>19087791

‘Leifer stole my body’: Sisters reveal lasting legacy of abuse by former principal

David Estcourt - June 28, 2023

1/2

With the court lectern turned to address her rapist – former ultra-Orthodox school principal Malka Leifer – Elly Sapper stood up, gathered her courage and revealed that just six days before her abuser was convicted, she lost her unborn child.

She didn’t know whether it was linked to her abuse, or the stress she had endured at the trial, but it was part of a story of exploitation and loss that began two decades ago and continued in the Melbourne County Court on Wednesday.

“What can I do? Nothing,” Sapper told the court. “Because this trauma was done to me, and I am forced to inherit its pain and consequences for the rest of my life.”

The miscarriage of her little girl is another cost that forms part of the decades-long fight that has cost three sisters – Sapper, Dassi Erlich and Nicole Meyer – an impossible toll for seeking justice, and one they are still paying.

On Wednesday, Erlich and Sapper finally confronted Leifer – who was found guilty of rape and sexual assault in April – saying her abuse and subsequent absconding overseas meant they were constantly and unexpectedly seized by intrusive thoughts and struggled with intimacy for years after.

Leifer, 56, appeared from the Murray Unit at the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre and listened intently, seated slightly sideways in blue prison clothing and not reacting to their statements. Leifer spoke briefly, confirming her name, age and that she did not have an occupation due to custody.

Erlich, who spoke first, told the court she believed Leifer would be a source of safety from the traumatic household she grew up in. Instead, her former teacher became the architect of her pain.

“Malka Leifer stole my body, I was forced to sever the connection with my physical self. I did not know how to protect myself, abuse became my norm,” she told the court.

“I dream sometimes of the future I could have had. A future that didn’t revolve around her abuse or the fear that she was hurting other vulnerable girls in the way she did me. The way I know she hurt my sisters.

“Malka Leifer, you shattered my trust, stole my body, and altered my life’s course, but you could not break my spirit.”

She admitted that, even to this day, Erlich worries about the influence Leifer still holds over her, but said she has chosen to “focus on the light within herself” and the “power of [her] own voice”.

“I am resilient, I am powerful, and I am so much more than the limitations you imposed on me.”

Sapper, who spoke next, told the court that Leifer was the first person to tell Sapper that she loved her, a feeling alien to her after growing up in a household where she was denied love by her parents.

“She was the first person who said to me she loved me,” Sapper said. “It was a feeling that I had never felt before.”

“When confronted with the painful truth that her love wasn’t real, it was a betrayal of such magnitude, it left me utterly broken.”

Sapper said intrusive thoughts would ambush her, paralysing her, she said, and the abuse had changed the way she perceived physical affection. She spoke about the loss of her unborn child during the trial.

“Sitting there in court and reliving some of the most awful times in my life, I knew that I needed to be strong as I was holding a future life. It gave me the courage and strength to get up and face every day in court.

“And six days before the verdict, we lost our little girl. Her heart stopped beating. There were no concrete answers,” she said.

“I refuse to let the broken fragments within me define me entirely … every day forward, I will learn to be more free to laugh, to cry, and to love with an open, genuine heart.”

The sisters have granted The Age permission to use their names.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087888

File: c6c91c1f2882fc3⋯.jpg (5.33 MB,7778x5185,7778:5185,Sisters_Elly_Sapper_Nicole….jpg)

File: 7b70fc69bf023a5⋯.jpg (687.57 KB,1240x1755,248:351,0001.jpg)

File: f8fbe92029caf6c⋯.jpg (644.47 KB,1240x1755,248:351,0002.jpg)

File: 23be1c2832b71a2⋯.jpg (465.27 KB,1240x1755,248:351,0003.jpg)

File: 360ce2e59720df8⋯.pdf (198.48 KB,FINAL_Victim_Impact_Statem….pdf)

>>19087883

2/2

After a six-week trial, a jury found Leifer guilty in April of 18 charges, including rape, indecent assault and sexual penetration of a child aged 16 or 17 against two sisters. They cleared her of all charges relating to Meyer.

Nicole Meyer also gave a statement outside court, saying that even though a jury did not find Leifer guilty of abusing her, she wanted to speak on behalf of victims who feel like they did not receive justice.

Meyer spoke because, she said, even though the verdicts had denied her validation for the pain she suffers, they did “not erase the fear and anxiety and profound impact on my mental health”.

Meyer said Leifer was a person she trusted, turned to and looked up to. A role model, teacher, principal and boss.

“She was supposed to be my safe person to whom I trusted with horrifying details of the abuse I endured at home,” she said.

“She took all that pure innocent trust and twisted it to suit her own evil desires. Every part of my life from the day she arrived here in Australia until the day she fled to Israel has been tarnished by her abuse.

Meyer said part of the reason she gave a statement was to speak for the “countless survivors who endure these battles silently, their voices silenced by a legal system that often falls short of delivering justice”.

“I see you and I feel for you and I believe you.”

The court heard that in prison Leifer was fearful all the time, had nightmares and hallucinations, thinks the guards want to kill her, and reacts strongly to loud noises inside the prison.

Defence barrister Ian Hill, KC, said Leifer had been prescribed various antipsychotic medications, that her imprisonment is onerous because of her strict religious beliefs, and that he expected her to be sent to immigration detention and deported to Israel as soon as her prison term ended.

Hill said the offences were committed 15 to 19 years ago when Leifer was a respected educator, administrator and community leader.

“Today, all these years later, she is a truly lonely and isolated and broken woman held in protective custody in a maximum security prison, far from her culture, far from her religion, and significantly, far from her family, all of whom live overseas,” Hill said.

“That includes her husband of many years, her eight children and her 17 grandchildren, whose ages range between a couple of weeks and 15 years.

“As a maximum security prisoner, in protection, convicted of offences against children of a sexual nature, she is not allowed to have in her possession photographs of her grandchildren, or for that matter any child.”

Hill said that when considering what Leifer is losing, “the celebrations and the events by way of birthdays, weddings and other matters that she is missing out on, one appreciated the enormity of her position or hardship”.

The former principal’s prosecution became an international scandal when she was rushed out of the country in the middle of the night in March 2008, as allegations of her sexual abuse against students began to mount. She would not return to Victoria to face justice for more than 10 years.

Earlier this month, police reopened their investigation into board members from the ultra-Orthodox Jewish school who in 2008 may have assisted Leifer in fleeing to Israel.

The jury was told Leifer had travelled between Israel and Australia but given no context about what prompted the travel, or whether it related to the allegations.

If you need support, call the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service on 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/leifer-stole-my-body-sisters-reveal-lasting-impact-of-abuse-agony-20230627-p5djva.html

https://www.smh.com.au/interactive/hub/media/tearout-excerpt/17964/FINAL_Victim-Impact-Statement_15-June-2023.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19087902

File: 56902c866f73c71⋯.jpg (477.73 KB,825x948,275:316,DE_68.jpg)

>>18755037 (pb)

>>19087791

>>19087883

Dassi Erlich Tweet

Today, was empowering and difficult. It was important to share in our words, the pain and trauma we endured. However, we also heard about the 'hardships' Leifer faces where she attempted to paint herself as a victim of her own consequences.

https://twitter.com/dassi_erlich/status/1673948827865448448

‘Leifer stole my body’: Sisters reveal lasting legacy of abuse by former principal

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/leifer-stole-my-body-sisters-reveal-lasting-impact-of-abuse-agony-20230627-p5djva.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19094002

File: 700e678eea41d12⋯.jpg (81.5 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_board_of_inquiry_annou….jpg)

Inquiry to look at allegations of ‘vile’ historical child sexual abuse at Victorian state school

Daniel Andrews pledges formal apology to victim-survivors who attended Beaumaris primary school in 1960s and 1970s

Adeshola Ore - 28 Jun 2023

Allegations of “evil and vile” historical child sexual abuse at a Victorian state school in the 1960s and 1970s will be investigated by a special inquiry that will hear the testimonies of victim-survivors.

The premier, Daniel Andrews, announced the board of inquiry on Wednesday morning and pledged to deliver a formal apology to recognise abuse victim-survivors who attended Beaumaris primary school, in Melbourne’s south-east.

The apology will be separate to a wider apology the government is due to deliver later this year that will recognise historical child abuse in institutional care settings like orphanages.

Glen Fearnett, who has fought for government recognition of abuse he and others suffered from paedophile teachers, said he wanted to represent victims who had died before the inquiry was announced.

“Their families are missing loved ones because of events that took place in their childhood,” he said.

Fearnett said he hoped the inquiry and apology would help the public understand the prevalence of child sexual abuse.

“No one wants to talk about it. No one wants to listen to it. It’s uncomfortable,” he said.

Tim Courtenay, a survivor of alleged abuse at the school, said the inquiry was a “milestone” in the lives of all people affected.

The inquiry will be chaired by the Victorian law reform commissioner Kathleen Foley. Guardian Australia revealed in January that in the wake of George Pell’s death, survivors of abuse at Beaumaris primary school in the 1970s were pushing for a formal apology by the state government.

Andrews said there were a number of “vile, evil and incredibly damaging” cases of child sexual abuse at the school.

“School should be a place of love and care and support [and] learning. It should be a community that is safe. Beaumaris primary school most certainly was not during the 60s and 70s,” he said.

Andrews said the government was aware of at least three former staff members of the school who had allegedly engaged in “predatory behaviour,” making the school a “unique case” which deserved a separate apology to that planned for other victim-survivors of abuse in institutional settings like orphanages and missions. He said the inquiry’s scope could be widened to include allegations at other schools if evidence was uncovered.

Andrews also said the government needed to overhaul the way some departments dealt with civil cases, and the resistance to settlements. He said he regretted how some departments and agencies had acted and said work was under way to ensure they were adhering to the best practice model.

Lawyer John Rule from Maurice Blackburn, who is handling several cases against the department on behalf of alleged Beaumaris victims, previously told Guardian Australia the education department had developed a reputation for being “aggressive” in defending claims.

Rule on Wednesday said he welcomed the government’s commitment to act on complaints about tactics used by the education department.

The premier said it was vital to hear and believe victim-survivors, and acknowledged the bravery of the former Beaumaris students who had come forward to detail their allegations.

“Having your truth recorded forever is a very important thing,” he told reporters.

The state’s shadow treasurer, Brad Rowswell, whose electorate of Sandringham takes in Beaumaris, had been pushing for a state-wide parliamentary inquiry into the allegations of abuse in public schools. But Andrews said “the last thing we need is more politicians involved in this”.

Rowswell on Wednesday said allowing victim-survivors from Beaumaris to have their voices heard without offering the same opportunity to others was “not right.”

The government committed $4.5m for the inquiry and for a support system to be established for victim-survivors and their families. The inquiry is due to report to the government by the end of February.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jun/28/inquiry-to-look-at-allegations-of-vile-historical-child-sexual-abuse-at-victorian-state-school

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19094004

File: 7e04bb0500aef0b⋯.jpg (44.2 KB,1179x783,131:87,Alexander_Csergo_continued….jpg)

File: a23c153912de1bb⋯.jpg (41.7 KB,862x575,862:575,Mr_Csergo_is_the_first_per….jpg)

File: ad04ddf3490350c⋯.jpg (480.49 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Mr_Csergo_was_living_under….jpg)

>>18693611 (pb)

>>18708573 (pb)

>>18714036 (pb)

Bondi man Alexander Csergo was warned to leave China by American contact he suspected was a spy

Echo Hui - 28 June 2023

1/2

A Sydney businessman accused of selling Australian defence and security secrets in China was warned to leave the country immediately by an American contact who he suspected was a US intelligence operative, his lawyer told a Sydney court.

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) charged the man, Alexander Csergo, 55, with one count of reckless foreign interference in April.

Mr Csergo is the first person to be charged with the offence, which attracts a jail term of up to 15 years under laws introduced by the Turnbull government in 2018.

New details of the case emerged in two court hearings this month as Mr Csergo's legal representatives continued to fight for his bail, and the police applied for suppression orders concerning the case.

The AFP has alleged in court that for two years, Mr Csergo communicated with people he suspected were spies, named "Ken" and "Evelyn", and had compiled reports for the alleged agents in exchange for cash in envelopes.

Mr Csergo appeared via video link for a bail hearing at Downing Centre Local Court before Magistrate Julia Virgo on June 5.

His barrister Bernard Collaery told the hearing that his client was "an Australian working for survival" during a severe lockdown in Shanghai, China's largest city, when the two suspected spies started to "handle and groom" him in early 2020.

"During this period, [he] experienced high levels of anxiety, he was in survival mode," Mr Collaery told the court.

He acknowledged that his client, who was working with Chinese state-owned telecommunication company China Telecom, was cooperative with the pair, but said that he did this to make sure he could leave the "repressive regime" safely and to ensure his business interests were not compromised.

"He was quietly packing his goods and arranging to get out of China for good," Mr Collaery told the hearing.

Mr Collaery told the hearing his client had no access to classified information from the Australian government and the reports he wrote did not "give anything away".

"Ken repeatedly requested additional material on the topics … but he refused these requests," Mr Collaery told the court.

Mr Collaery told the court that while in China working for his client Mr Csergo received a "warning" from an American contact who he believed to be an intelligence officer.

"He has been contacted by the United States corporate contact and offered to lift him out of China within 24 hours if he needed help," Mr Collaery told the hearing.

Mr Collaery told the court his client was a "loyal Australian citizen" and expected to be contacted by the Australian government after being warned by the American contact, but such communication never occurred.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19094006

File: 73ac807e6446d0d⋯.jpg (184.85 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Mr_Csergo_s_lawyer_Bernard….jpg)

File: e78a742749f1db5⋯.jpg (107.3 KB,1278x715,1278:715,Mr_Csergo_was_arrested_by_….jpg)

File: 0a64325f18931a7⋯.jpg (128.17 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Alexander_Csergo_has_been_….jpg)

>>19094004

2/2

Csergo brought list of topics to Australia to prove grooming, lawyer tells court

Mr Collaery told the hearing that when his client returned to Australia, he took measures to avoid alerting the suspected agents that he did not plan to return to China.

He told the court Mr Csergo kept his Chinese bank account open and took only one piece of carry-on luggage with his computer containing all his work.

Before he left China, the alleged spies had given Mr Csergo a "shopping list" of topics concerning Australia's national security interests that they wanted information about, Mr Collaery told the court.

Connor McCraith, a solicitor for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, told the court the "shopping list" was discovered by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) three weeks after Mr Csergo arrived in Sydney in early March.

"You did not advise any Australian authorities of this [list]," Mr McCraith said.

But Mr Collaery said Mr Csergo took the "shopping list" back to prove the approach.

"He brought that as proof that these people were realistic and had been trying to groom him, not [to] complete the answers on a 'shopping list' and [he] never intended to do anything on the list," Mr Collaery told the hearing.

Csergo researched obtaining alternative passport, court hears

Mr McCraith told the hearing Mr Csergo continued to communicate with "Ken" via WeChat while in Australia, advising him on issues between Australia and China.

He said weeks after ASIO attended Mr Csergo's home in Bondi in late March, Mr Csergo contacted the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade about the status of his passport and found out it had been suspended.

Mr Csergo then made a range of web searches to find out whether he could apply for a Romanian or Greek passport.

"It is submitted that this type of behaviour is indicative of someone who is exploring their options [to leave] the country," Mr McCraith told the court.

Magistrate Virgo rejected Mr Csergo's bail application, citing his "substantial connection to a foreign government", and his behaviour.

"It is concerning to me that Mr Csergo himself did not volunteer this information on his arrival into this country knowing that he was of the view that he was in the process of being groomed by the persons," Ms Virgo said while laying out her reasoning.

Csergo 'struggling' in custody, lawyer says

Mr Csergo appeared via video link in Sydney Downing Local Court again on June 14.

The afternoon before the hearing, the commissioner of the AFP filed an application for a suppression order in relation to certain information concerning the case, including the identities of the people listed in a confidential annexure.

Barrister Rob Ranken, representing the AFP commissioner, told the court the AFP had provided a 10-page open affidavit and would hand up another 25-page confidential affidavit.

The AFP is opposing provision of the confidential affidavit to Mr Csergo or his legal representatives.

Mr Csergo's lawyer, Jolan Draaisma, told the court that the matter went to the issue of open justice.

She said his legal team might make another bail application in the NSW Supreme Court at a later date.

Outside court, Ms Draaisma said she was concerned about the level of secrecy around the case.

She said her client was "struggling". Mr Csergo has been held on remand at the Parklea Correctional Centre in Sydney's north-west since April.

"It's very difficult to see him, it's very difficult to have access to him," Ms Draaisma said.

"Counsel Bernard Collaery travelled two and a half hours from Canberra to visit him only to be refused at the front door. So that's the difficulties that we're dealing with."

The matter is scheduled to return to court on August 11, when the police application for suppression orders is due to be heard.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-28/suspected-us-spy-told-alexander-csergo-leave-china-court-hears/102531036

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19094098

File: 38ea163970a6b36⋯.jpg (1.06 MB,4500x3000,3:2,New_South_Wales_Premier_Gl….jpg)

File: 2714e6d742fdb45⋯.jpg (510.8 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0001.jpg)

File: 0ca08714a3629d2⋯.jpg (788.19 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0002.jpg)

File: c56ac03165e604f⋯.jpg (323.23 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0003.jpg)

File: ed6f6c5edb9e633⋯.pdf (3.12 MB,Investigation_into_the_con….pdf)

Corruption inquiry in Australia uncovers China links to state lawmaker

Kirsty Needham - June 29, 2023

SYDNEY, June 29 (Reuters) - The former premier of Australia's most populous state engaged in corrupt conduct involving another lawmaker with whom she was in a secret romantic relationship, a years-long corruption inquiry that examined business dealings with China said on Thursday.

The New South Wales Independent Commission into Corruption (ICAC) said in a report that Gladys Berejiklian had failed to notify the commission of her concerns that Daryl Maguire, a member of the state assembly with whom she was in a relationship during her term of office, may have engaged in corrupt conduct, and this undermined the ministerial code.

As the premier of New South Wales in 2020 Berejiklian, once a star of the Liberal party and widely respected for her leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic, told the corruption inquiry she had been in a secret "close personal relationship" with Maguire, who was under investigation for monetising his position through business dealings with China.

A year later she resigned when the watchdog said it was investigating whether she was involved in conduct that "constituted or involved a breach of public trust".

Berejiklian said the report was being examined by her lawyers. "At all times I have worked my hardest in the public interest," she said in a statement.

The inquiry said Maguire sought to use his government office to "create a network between China and Australia and to make a commission in multiple ways".

The Australian arm of China's largest property developer became his client after an introduction by the founder of the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China at one of its meetings. Australia declared the council a Chinese-government linked entity in February.

Maguire told the inquiry he had received envelopes containing thousands of dollars in cash at his parliament office as part of a scheme for Chinese nationals to fraudulently acquire visas.

The commission found Maguire engaged in "serious corrupt conduct" between 2012 and 2018 for the migration scheme and other misconduct.

It said he misused his role as chairman of the New South Wales Parliament's Asia Pacific Friendship Group to advance the commercial interests of a Chinese business association in South Pacific nations.

He was also found to have monetised his position as a lawmaker to benefit a company, G8way, which sought to sell access to "high levels of government" in Australia. G8way's "man in Beijing" was a former vice consul in Sydney, it said.

Maguire also misused his office by receiving a fee to introduce the party secretary of China's Liaoning province to then New South Wales premier Barry O'Farrell at parliament in 2012, it said.

Maguire already faces a criminal charge for his role in the visa scheme, for which he has not entered a plea in court.

His lawyer said he was still reading the report, which is more than 600 pages long. He previously said the commission was "not authorised" to make findings that a criminal offence had been committed.

The commission said it would seek advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions on whether further prosecutions should be commenced into Maguire.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/former-premier-australias-new-south-wales-state-engaged-corrupt-conduct-inquiry-2023-06-29/

https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/2023-media-releases/icac-finds-former-premier-and-then-member-for-wagga-wagga-corrupt

https://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/investigations/past-investigations/2023/former-nsw-mp-for-wagga-wagga-operation-keppel/operation-keppel-investigation-report

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19094129

File: a759de937f286e0⋯.jpg (254.5 KB,1600x900,16:9,L_R_Sisters_Elly_Sapper_Ni….jpg)

File: 341a701d24ba1b7⋯.jpg (1.07 MB,3840x2560,3:2,Malka_Leifer_right_appears….jpg)

>>18755037 (pb)

>>19087791

Leifer faked mental illness and should be denied sentencing discount, prosecutor says

David Estcourt - June 29, 2023

1/2

Malka Leifer should be denied a significant sentencing discount for her time in prison and under house arrest in Israel because she was feigning mental illness to frustrate her prosecution, a court has heard.

Prosecutor Justin Lewis also told County Court Judge Mark Gamble that attempts by the former principal of a Jewish ultra-Orthodox school to thwart extradition to Australia may have been intended at preventing her trial for sexual crimes entirely.

Leifer, a mother of eight, was found guilty by a jury in April of 18 charges including rape and indecent assault against two sisters – Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich – who were former students of Adass Israel School. After a six-week trial, she was cleared of all charges relating to a third sister, Nicole Meyer.

The sisters have granted The Age permission to use their names.

Lewis on Thursday said Leifer, 56, was able to delay her extradition from Israel for years by firstly feigning mental illness, sometimes in near catatonic states, which she claimed prevented her from being sent to Australia. She then appealed against decisions made by several Israeli legal and medical panels, which found her condition was faked.

“The accused has somehow strung out the proceedings for whatever purpose in order ... to delay the extradition, or indeed, potentially to eventually defeat the prosecution because of the delay itself,” Lewis argued during a pre-sentence hearing.

In total, the court heard, Leifer has spent more than 2600 days in various forms of detention between Australia and Israel. Of that, 608 days were under house arrest in Israel, and 51 days were in custody there in 2014.

Leifer was charged by Victorian police in 2012 – while she was in Israel – and extradition hearings began in 2014.

Defence barrister Ian Hill, KC, said his client was entitled to have her time under house arrest and in custody in Israel considered as part of her sentence.

But the prosecution argues that if Gamble determines that Leifer improperly frustrated and delayed the extradition proceedings, then not all of those 51 days should be declared as pre-sentence detention and less weight should be given to the 20 months she spent under house arrest.

Lewis said that according to Israeli courts, Leifer would often go into a psychotic state in the days before she was due to appear in court over the allegations.

“The appellant enters a psychotic state before any legal hearing in her case, and during her examinations by psychiatrists, and as claimed by her attorney she experiences a psychotic breakdown before any legal hearing in the case,” he said, quoting an Israeli legal decision.

“Indeed, the appellant’s hospitalisations are almost always done several days before the hearing of her case.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19094134

File: 13b0b778a4c02ce⋯.jpg (451.68 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Sisters_Elly_Sapper_Nicole….jpg)

File: 9cbc2b1b0e879b7⋯.jpg (199.54 KB,1754x1316,877:658,Leifer_was_found_guilty_of….jpg)

>>19094129

2/2

A judge can apply a sentencing discount when an offender has spent time in custody, under house arrest or is subject to other conditions which a court might deem punitive and connected to their case.

Hill said that Leifer’s absence of prior convictions and the fact her offending occurred 15 or more years ago should weigh in her favour, as should the hardship of isolation from her religion, culture and family caused by her being in custody.

“Clearly, your honour could conclude that the court process and the resultant public scrutiny has been distressing,” Hill told the judge.

Lewis argued Leifer’s offending involved a pattern of behaviour which included initial grooming and subsequently led to “more serious penetrative acts”.

“It involved a cynical misuse by the accused of knowledge gained in the course of her role as an educator. Victims were enduring a particularly miserable home life at the hands of an abusive mother,” he said.

Lewis said Leifer used her position of authority and respect within the ultra-Orthodox community, and particularly within the school itself, to abuse the sisters.

“These were particularly vulnerable victims who were preyed upon by someone who was in entirely unequal stature and standing in their community,” the prosecutor said.

The former principal’s prosecution became an international scandal when she was rushed out of Australia in the middle of the night in March 2008, as allegations of her sexual abuse against students began to mount. She did not return to Victoria to face justice for more than 10 years.

Earlier this month, police reopened their investigation into board members from the ultra-Orthodox school who in 2008 may have assisted Leifer fleeing to Israel.

If you need support, call the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service on 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/leifer-faked-mental-illness-and-should-be-denied-sentencing-discount-prosecutor-says-20230629-p5dkcf.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19099367

File: 732c38db37ce8a5⋯.jpg (88.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_rejects_f….jpg)

File: 212ab9a507934d5⋯.jpg (52.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Albanese_reaffirmed_his….jpg)

File: 174935f02099427⋯.jpg (83.09 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Albanese_said_the_Voice….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Anthony Albanese rejects ‘frankly diminishing’ Voice scare campaign

COURTNEY GOULD - JUNE 30, 2023

Anthony Albanese has reiterated the Voice to parliament will not have the power to veto government, taking aim at fear campaigns for suggesting otherwise.

In the wake of lagging support in recent opinion polls, the Prime Minister called on those clinging to a “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” mentality to consider the status quo is already “profoundly broken”.

“Indigenous people have an eight-year gap in life expectancy, a suicide rate twice as high, and rates of disease and infant mortality and family violence so much worse than those of the general community,” he said.

“Something that shakes me is that young men are more likely to go to jail than to go to university. They have among the worst incarceration rates in the world.

“Only four out of the 19 Closing the Gap targets are on track. Four out of 19. These figures are a call-out to all of us to make this a national priority.”

The referendum, which would enshrine the advisory body in the constitution, is set to be put to the people between October and December.

Mr Albanese and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney have faced a barrage of questions from the opposition about the extent of influence the Voice will have should Australians agree to establish the body.

On Friday, the Prime Minister sought to hose down concerns in an address to businesses leaders at the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce.

“I assure you that if the Voice was there when the Reserve Bank meets next week about interest rates they would not get on the phone to the Voice,” he said.

“They don’t get on the phone with the Prime Minister.

“Some of these fear campaigns are frankly diminishing of the people who make them.”

Mr Albanese stressed the referendum was a “once-in-a-generation opportunity to make a positive change” that will outlast Australians.

“It will not take away anything from our 122-year-old democracy. Instead, as the Solicitor-General has clearly stated, it will enhance our democracy,” the Prime Minister said.

“It is a small investment with such a great return. None of us has anything to lose. But we have something wonderful and so very real to gain.

“And with a Yes vote, it will lift us all.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/anthony-albanese-rejects-frankly-diminishing-voice-scare-campaign/news-story/2fecc9d0dee5ba1e393256bc2f39a16a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19099380

File: 64b551710da1643⋯.jpg (75.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_his_c….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Yes23 expects up to 50k volunteers to campaign on-the-ground for an Indigenous voice to parliament

ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - JUNE 29, 2023

Yes23 - the leading organisation in support of an Indigenous voice to parliament - is hoping to assemble an army of up to 50,000 on-the-ground volunteers by referendum day, as the Albanese government prepares to deliver a “supporting” political campaign.

While the Prime Minister will inject himself into the centre of the Yes case, The Australian understands there will be no central federal Labor headquarters during the official campaign as there is ahead of an election.

It was unclear whether Mr Albanese’s travel schedule would mirror an election campaign, according to government sources, and ministers were being invited to speak at events rather than ­directing the campaign.

“Since day one, we’ve not wanted it to be ‘Anthony Albanese’s voice’. We can’t be leading this,” a senior government source said.

While there is consternation within Labor’s ranks about how the Yes campaign was being run, with one MP on Thursday saying it was “a bit all over the shop”, Yes23 was hoping its major day of action on Sunday would act as a significant volunteer drive and be seen as a marker for supporters to “go hard” until referendum day.

It’s amassed nearly 12,000 volunteers already but expects to sign up 40,000 to 50,000 people.

In the No camp, more than 150,000 Australians have signed a pledge to “vote No to a divided Australia”. Like Yes23, leading No organisation Fair Australia expects close to 50,000 volunteers on polling booths.

Yes23 is focusing on sausage sizzles, picnics and community forums for campaign events, believing face-to-face conversations are most effective at persuading undecided voters.

Their representatives will steer clear of discussing the mechanics of the voice and instead stress the practical outcomes it could have in areas like health, education and youth justice.

The No camp’s overarching message is the voice will divide Australians, while reflecting “extreme concerns” about the lack of detail and the financial cost of the advisory body during the cost-of-living crisis.

Opponents are attending local community and party events, as well as multicultural forums, and sources said Labor voters were also reaching out asking how they could get involved.

In the two largest No states, Queensland (54 per cent against) and Western Australia (52 per cent), state Labor parties are encouraging members to join Yes23 events or volunteer for the Yes case.

WA Labor is relying on a big contact book that grew exponentially during its successful state election campaign six years ago when it turfed out the Liberal Barnett government.

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price continued her campaigning against the voice in Tasmania this week, with an event in Hobart where nearly 200 people attended.

She also attended a campaign event with Liberal MP Gavin Pearce, while Yes23 co-chair ­Rachel Perkins visited Indigenous communities in far north Western Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/yes23-expects-up-to-50k-volunteers-to-campaign-ontheground-for-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/2bebbf95b37fa91df2c701b94a94ff64

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19099393

File: 741ecdf6e558610⋯.jpg (125.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Michael_Mansell_chairman_o….jpg)

File: d8c6dbe64ecc855⋯.jpg (245.11 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prominent_Tasmanian_First_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Mansell plea: ‘Stop polarising Voice referendum and negotiate compromise with progressive No campaigners’

MATTHEW DENHOLM - JUNE 30, 2023

Veteran Aboriginal activist Michael Mansell is urging Anthony Albanese to cancel the voice referendum in the face of falling support and instead legislate an advisory body and start treaty talks.

Mr Mansell, who is chair of the Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania, told The Weekend Australian the Prime Minister should drop the referendum and negotiate with “progressive” voice opponents on alternatives.

The lawyer and leading advocate for Indigenous Tasmanians since the 1970s said these could include legislating a voice, Aboriginal-designated parliamentary seats and a national treaty and truth-telling process.

“We would hope that the PM would abandon the referendum – he can say ‘it’s not going to get up, the opinion polls keep sliding, I don’t want to polarise the Australian people on this issue’,” Mr Mansell said.

“Putting the so-called voice in the Constitution raises unnecessary constitutional concerns. They should stay away from a referendum and legislate now.”

Mr Albanese should reach out to “progressive” voice opponents to chart a unifying course forward for “real empowerment” of Aboriginal Australians, he said.

This could include states electing an Indigenous senator, as well as “getting on with truth telling and treaty”.

“We cannot get him to the table (on treaty) while he’s dealing with a referendum,” said Mr Mansell, who has stepped up his No campaign, including an addresses to the Royal Society on Sunday.

Newspoll suggests Tasmania has switched from a Yes state several months ago to a No state.

However, prominent Tasmanian First Nations Yes campaigner Rodney Dillon said the affirmative case could rebound, with himself and others stepping up their campaigns.

“It will probably fluctuate and I think it will be a close call in the end in Tasmania,” said Mr Dillon, of the Tasmanian Regional Aboriginal Communities Alliance.

He said Mr Mansell’s alternative would fail to provide long-overdue Constitutional recog­nition for Indigenous Australians.

“I think the voice is the best outcome for our people – it’s democratic and we’ll be recognised in the Constitution, where we’ve been invisible,” he said.

“This is a time when we can all come together and be part of something important.”

Mr Mansell, an attendee of the Uluru gathering that led to the Statement from the Heart, said the voice would of itself not achieve anything for Aboriginal people’s health, education or incarceration rates.

But Mr Dillon argued that the voice would improve both policy and programs.

“If we don’t have people there advising them (the government) what to do, we’ll keep getting the same results,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/mansell-plea-stop-polarising-voice-referendum-and-negotiate-compromise-with-progressive-no-campaigners/news-story/ab855994305bb19dec9e14688e4e3c76

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19099473

File: ada0b1155729ba4⋯.jpg (3.18 MB,7087x4721,7087:4721,Pope_Francis_attends_the_M….jpg)

File: e164471ec2a2c98⋯.jpg (555.79 KB,1168x959,1168:959,Holy_See_Press_Office_Audi….jpg)

File: 9afb98adb6339aa⋯.jpg (212.87 KB,825x846,275:282,SA_2.jpg)

File: d87b4eef0f36627⋯.jpg (41.3 KB,666x1024,333:512,media_Fz3k5ftXwAAEpss.jpg)

>>18934224

Pope Francis meets family of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange

Alvise Armellini and Gavin Jones - June 30, 2023

VATICAN CITY, June 30 (Reuters) - Pope Francis on Friday granted an audience to the wife of Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks who is behind bars in Britain and battling extradition to the United States.

"The Holy Father has received in audience Mrs. Stella Assange, with family members," a Vatican statement said, with no further details.

Stella Assange tweeted that her family was "overwhelmed" by the private audience, with a photo of herself dressed in black in St. Peter's Square and the hashtag #FreeAssangeNOW.

She is fronting the campaign to have her husband released, but the Vatican did not say if this was discussed in the meeting or if Francis expressed any support for it.

A Vatican spokesman said papal audiences are private affairs.

Assange is wanted in the U.S. over the release of confidential U.S. military records and diplomatic cables in 2010. His supporters see his prosecution as a politically motivated assault on journalism and free speech.

Washington says the release of the documents had put lives in danger.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/pope-francis-meets-family-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-2023-06-30/

https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2023/06/30/230630c.html

https://nitter.net/Stella_Assange/status/1674746374095609858

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19099510

File: 39df56032945342⋯.jpg (93.83 KB,1280x720,16:9,Outgiong_Chief_Health_Offi….jpg)

>>18977760

Brett Sutton announced as Victorian of the Year

ANGELICA SNOWDEN - JUNE 30, 2023

Victoria’s outgoing chief health officer professor Brett Sutton has been declared Victorian of the year.

Dr Sutton, who recently announced he would leave the state’s Department of Health after 10 years and resign as CHO after four years in the job, accepted the gong in a Victoria Day Council Awards ceremony at Melbourne Town Hall on Friday.

The award is separate to those given by the National Australia Day Council on January 26.

After he won the award for public and community service, Dr Sutton joked he may not have won the gong if soon-to-be English premier league Tottenham head coach Ange Postecoglou still lived in Victoria.

“It was a privilege to steward Victorians though very very choppy waters … the crisis of a lifetime. It was an achievement not of mine but of the people of Victoria,” Seven News reported Dr Sutton said.

He added: “we did it together and for that we are richer and stronger”.

Former Labor premier John Brumby presented the award to Dr Sutton, and said he was a “trusted public face” during the pandemic.

Dr Sutton was a controversial figure during the Covid-19 pandemic, when his health advice allowed Premier Daniel Andrews to impose curfews, playground bans and 262 days of lockdown.

The Covid-19 rules lead to Melbourne being crowned the most locked down city in the world, along with other restrictions that included travel limits and homeschooling children.

He joined premier Daniel Andrews most days to deliver updates on infection numbers and to urge the community to heed health warnings to restrict movement in a bid to halt the spread of Covid-19, particularly when the community was not widely vaccinated.

Victorian agriculture Minister Gayle Tierney praised Dr Sutton amid news he received the top gong.

“He was an absolute stalwart right through the Covid pandemic. He put in so much time and effort and energy in making sure that we had the right settings and I absolutely applaud his work,” she said.

Opposition special Minister of state David Davis tweeted he did not believe Dr Sutton’s appointment was the “right choice”.

“Controversial. He kept key documents secret, was part of failed management of Covid in Victoria: worlds longest lockdown, failed quarantine,” he said.

About two weeks ago, Dr Sutton announced he would leave his CHO role to take up a position as director of health and biosecurity at the CSIRO in September.

At the time, he said it would be a “relief” to be away from the public scrutiny of the CHO role.

“I accept that in a crisis that has to sit on your shoulders, there’s no escaping that, and I was in the midst of that beast for a long time,” he said.

“On the one hand, it’s helped me to grow personally and professionally, on the other hand it nearly crushed me, and it certainly weighed upon my family life and I don’t want them to have to carry that in the same way ever again. They won’t.

“But, what a rock for me to have the family that I do have, and my enormous thanks to them for really carrying me through those times.”

The Victoria Day Council awards were created to celebrate the day Victoria was founded, on July 1.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brett-sutton-announced-as-victorian-of-the-year/news-story/74763c82fa7f0126bffdd5be13b442cc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19103525

File: eebafeda1030337⋯.jpg (91.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,Jacinda_Ardern_berated_Sco….jpg)

File: 7425ef3d5fede1a⋯.jpg (120.88 KB,768x1023,256:341,Jacinda_Ardern_with_Anthon….jpg)

‘Really angry’: Jacinda Ardern’s tensions with Scott Morrison revealed

ANNE BARROWCLOUGH - JUNE 30, 2023

New Zealand’s High Commissioner to Australia has revealed the simmering tensions between Jacinda Ardern and the Morrison government over migration policies, saying the NZ Prime Minister at one point became “really angry” with Scott Morrison.

In an interview with AAP ahead of her retirement in December, Annette King said the 501 deportation policy – under which Australia deported NZ criminals even if they had never lived in NZ – was a particular bone of contention.

In 2020 Dame Jacinda confronted then PM Morrison over the policy, telling him in front of reporters: “Do not deport your people and your problems”.

“It certainly upset the Morrison government … the previous government was angry with her for raising it (even though) she had already warned that she would,” Dame Annette said.

“She berated ScoMo on his treatment of New Zealanders. It was a really important signal back home to New Zealand.”

However, she added: “There was no way there was going to be any change under the previous government.”

But it was the Morrison government’s 2021 decision to strip the citizenship of a dual Australian-NZ national who had travelled to Syria to join ISIS that really infuriated his counterpart.

“ (Ardern) was brilliant on that issue because it was a surprise to us. The way it was presented to her, it left her really angry,” Dame Annette said. “Friends don’t do that to each other. I don’t think you’ll ever see that happen again.”

At the time, Dame Jacinda publicly slammed Australia for “exporting its problems,” but went on to agree to work with Canberra to solve the issue.

Dame Annette said the way the former NZ PM stood up to Canberra showed the much smaller country should do so more often.

“New Zealanders are known to be polite. And Australians are seen to be straightforward. You’re never left in doubt what Australia thinks,” she said.

“We could take a leaf out of Australia’s book actually and be polite with purpose.

“If Australia is thinking something, at an officials level or a political level, they will tell you, where we will listen politely.

“But you saw from Jacinda Ardern’s response to the deportations, the 501s, and to the stripping of citizenship, a public rebuke of Australia that you would not have seen often in the past.”

Dame Jacinda’s relationship with Anthony Albanese is warmer, with the PM giving New Zealanders a number of concessions, including allowing New Zealanders who have lived in Australia for four years to get citizenship.

Mr Albanese has also loosened the 501 rule, with fewer Kiwis deported if they don’t have real ties to the country.

“Just after Albanese became the prime minister, she came straight over and had dinner with him at Kirribilli House,” Dame Annette said. “He reaffirmed to her what he was going to do. He was incredibly enamoured with her advocacy.”

She added that apart from the “irritant on the people-to-people stuff,” for the most part Mr Morrison and Dame Jacinda enjoyed a good working relationship.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/really-angry-jacinda-arderns-tensions-with-scott-morrison-revealed/news-story/aca1f31ae4ffee8b180d653b275aa5f1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19103576

File: 9abdfa9cccd7e80⋯.mp4 (13.98 MB,640x360,16:9,Inquiry_to_investigate_all….mp4)

File: 4a9f8e93211816f⋯.jpg (1.12 MB,3500x2382,1750:1191,Glen_Fearnett_wants_victim….jpg)

>>19094002

Glen was sexually abused at Beaumaris Primary School. For 50 years, he thought he was the only one

Bianca Hall, Robyn Grace and Broede Carmody - June 28, 2023

1/2

Warning: Distressing content

Glen Fearnett joined Beaumaris Primary School in 1971, as a knock-kneed grade 4 kid.

By his first school camp, Fearnett had been sexually abused by one of a number of teachers who preyed on students, operating at the school with seeming impunity in the 1960s and ’70s.

He thought he was the only one. It took him 50 years – until other survivors began to come forward – to realise there were dozens of other victims who had suffered like he had. Fearnett believes at least 50 other children were sexually abused during the ’60s and ’70s at Beaumaris Primary School, and perhaps as many as 100 children.

“It’s bigger than people could possibly imagine,” he said.

“There’s three people [victims] I know who aren’t here with us anymore, for all sorts of reasons, and others whose lives were wrecked … And I think we needed some people needed to stand up and go, ‘Hey, this wasn’t okay’.”

On Wednesday the Victorian government joined that chorus, announcing a Board of Inquiry into what Premier Daniel Andrews described as “vile, evil and incredibly damaging abuse” at the school in Melbourne’s south-east.

Andrews said the investigation would acknowledge the “unique and evil goings-on” perpetrated in the past by at least three teachers at the school. It will also examine abuse by the same employees at other government schools.

“Without question, given there were multiple victims, multiple offenders, multiple predators at one time and also – without cutting across [legal] processes that are alive – a sense of collusion between those [offenders] … it is tragically a unique set of circumstances.”

Andrews said the inquiry would not investigate current Beaumaris Primary School teaching staff or other contemporary staff members.

But he said the terms of reference for the inquiry would not prohibit the inquiry going further, including examining sexual abuse at other schools.

“If evidence takes the inquiry there, then that’s where inquiry will go,” Andrews said.

Fearnett agrees the abuse he and others suffered was “evil”, but believes it was not unique.

“The Royal Commission [into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse] said there were 1069 schools where abuse took place – 44 per cent were government schools – and yet there isn’t one mention in the Royal Commission of a government school.”

It is his hope now the Board of Inquiry casts a forensic lens over any claims of historical abuse in government schools.

Asked why the government hadn’t taken up the opposition’s call for a broad-ranging parliamentary inquiry into allegations of abuse in government schools, Andrews said: “The last thing anyone needs is any more politicians involved in this”.

“Let’s allow for formal legal processes to do their work.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19103583

File: cef7b32ed84d105⋯.jpg (166.98 KB,1279x720,1279:720,On_Wednesday_morning_Premi….jpg)

>>19103576

2/2

Kathleen Foley, SC – a prominent barrister and Victorian Law Reform Commissioner – will chair the board of inquiry, bringing a forensic approach and “a good deal of compassion and care” to her task, Andrews said.

Maurice Blackburn Lawyers welcomed the announcement of the formal inquiry, as did Shine Lawyers.

“We act for dozens of survivors of abuse at public schools across Victoria, and we certainly do expect that as the inquiry unfolds, its investigations will inevitably go further than this one school,” a Maurice Blackburn spokesperson said in a statement.

Shine’s expert on abuse law, Alyssa Lewis, said: “This inquiry must examine the unforgivable practice of moving known predators from school to school.”

Victim-survivor Timothy Courtney said the inquiry was a significant milestone.

“It’s all about … people that have lost their voices,” he said. “I know of three people who aren’t with us anymore and sort of really feel that we needed to speak for them.”

Tim said he hoped the community could understand that child sexual abuse was more prevalent than people thought.

“The guys that haven’t spoken, haven’t gotten the voices yet can finally stand up and speak, knowing full well that they’ve got support,” he said.

The inquiry will report to the government in February and will also examine abuse by the same employees at other government schools.

The premier said an apology from the government to victim-survivors of abuse at state schools, and particularly Beaumaris Primary School, would follow.

“We have made commitments to provide an apology to care-leavers and others,” he said. “We believe it is warranted to have a separate apology [at Beaumaris Primary School] that acknowledges the unique and evil goings-on at that school.”

“Schools should be a place of love and care and learning … Beaumaris Primary School certainly was not during the ’60s and ’70s.”

Local MP Brad Rowswell welcomed the inquiry, but said he had been calling for a parliamentary investigation since last year.

“In February this year, I proposed terms of reference for an inquiry, and on every occasion that I have sought to establish that inquiry in the parliament, it has been rejected by the Andrews government,” he said.

The member for Sandringham added that the abuse that allegedly occurred at Beaumaris Primary School was “just the tip of the iceberg” and urged the government to extend the scope of its inquiry.

“We know that child sexual abuse is not isolated to one location, and we know that there are victim-survivors across the state who deserve to have the opportunity to have their voices heard also,” Rowswell said.

“To give some victim-survivors the opportunity for their voices to be heard and stories told, while not extending that opportunity to everyone, is just not right.”

The board of inquiry, which is independent of the government, will establish an official public record of the experiences of victim-survivors, as well as abuse perpetrated by the same staff members at other government schools.

It will report on the response of the Department of Education at the time; the most appropriate ways to support healing; and whether support services for victim-survivors are effective.

If you or anyone you know needs support, you can contact the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service on 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline 131 114, or Beyond Blue 1300 224 636.

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/premier-announces-inquiry-into-historical-sex-abuse-at-beaumaris-primary-school-20230628-p5dk0q.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19103632

File: 6cb5d096cd8fc55⋯.jpg (5.08 MB,8064x5376,3:2,Glen_Fearnett_a_victim_sur….jpg)

>>19094002

>>19103576

Lack of apology spurred action on decades of school child abuse

Robyn Grace - June 30, 2023

1/2

It was the lack of an apology that spurred the action.

When Beaumaris Primary School victim-survivor Glen Fearnett shared his story about historical child sexual abuse at the school with then Justice Party MP Stuart Grimley, his adviser Olivia Nicholls couldn’t believe the government hadn’t acknowledged what had occurred.

Then Fearnett’s story snowballed. The more Nicholls scratched the surface, the more distressing stories she found: other accounts of historical abuse at Beaumaris Primary; evidence of accused teachers being shuffled from school to school; widespread claims of teachers abusing children in other state schools.

“Everything started sort of almost falling into place in the most horrible, horrible sense,” she said.

“Everything Glen was saying was absolutely true. And then to discover that it was bigger than Beaumaris … It’s like the worst kind of achievement.”

Nicholls and Grimley spent a year working with Premier Daniel Andrews’ office to seek justice for victim-survivors before the MP lost his seat in the November state election.

The government committed to an apology in February. But this week, it went further.

Andrews on Wednesday announced a board of inquiry to examine what he described as “vile, evil and incredibly damaging” historical sexual abuse of children at Beaumaris Primary School in the 1960s and ’70s.

At least three teachers were involved in perpetrating abuse at Beaumaris and other schools. More than 50 children are believed to have been abused.

Nicholls said even with the inquiry’s specific focus on Beaumaris, “I don’t think we’ll ever know how bad it was”.

“If you look at class photos, you’ll see more than half of them have died early or have disclosed sexual abuse. So yeah, it’s significant.”

Beaumaris resident Bryce Gardiner still lives two blocks away from the school he attended as a child in the 1960s and ’70s.

Gardiner was one of the lucky ones who escaped abuse, although he said he once found himself alone in the multipurpose room with one of the accused teachers and demanded to be let out.

He’s still close to many of his former classmates, who struggle to accept that nothing was done sooner, given persistent rumours, previous claims and legal action.

“I find it difficult to believe someone in the school did not know,” he said.

The board of inquiry, which is independent of the government, will establish an official public record of the experiences of victim-survivors. Chaired by barrister and Victorian Law Reform Commissioner Kathleen Foley, SC, the inquiry will report to the government in February.

While Andrews said the inquiry would not be prohibited from examining sexual abuse at other schools, the terms of reference relate specifically to the Beaumaris school, the former teachers connected to the abuse and the department’s response to those claims.

Advocates worry the scope will be too narrow.

Liberal MP Brad Rowswell, who took over the campaign for a parliamentary inquiry into abuse in state schools when Grimley lost his seat, said Beaumaris was “the tip of the iceberg”. He urged the government to extend the scope of its inquiry.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19103636

File: 06d1f2f26fe053b⋯.jpg (1.63 MB,4000x2668,1000:667,Bryce_Gardiner_says_he_nar….jpg)

>>19103632

2/2

Karen Walker, whose brother Ian died in an accident after suffering long-term mental ill-health following childhood abuse at four institutions including Beaumaris Primary, dismissed the inquiry as political tokenism.

“If the government was serious about acknowledging the scale and scope of child sexual abuse that happened in government schools they would open the inquiry to all government schools,” she said.

Mauz Hatcher, the founder of survivor support group LOUD fence, said a lot of work had been done to address abuse in Catholic institutions, but state schools had “slid through”.

She said she hoped the Beaumaris inquiry would set a precedent, rather than shift the spotlight from unrelated cases.

“Hopefully it opens the door for more voices to speak out,” she said. “I really need to have faith that it will create scope for further investigations to happen. It has to start somewhere.”

Nicholls said she would still encourage victim-survivors from other schools to make a submission to the inquiry.

“I would expect that if they were getting submissions from other parts of the state they would do the right thing and say, ‘We think we need to expand the terms of reference here’.”

When asked about the scope of the inquiry, the education department referred The Age to Andrews’ comments earlier this week.

In his final speech to parliament last September, Grimley said Victoria had failed to properly address child abuse in state schools, systemically shuffling alleged and convicted paedophiles around schools, “which enabled more children to have their innocence taken away from them”.

One state teacher was sentenced five times between 1996 and 2018. Following a report against another, Grimley told parliament that the Department of Education’s then psychiatrist said it was “absolutely stupid” sending them back to the classroom “because you will just keep on offending against children”.

Grimley said that teacher taught at five more schools before he was charged in 2019 with 42 offences against 38 children, aged between 5 and 12 years.

Nationally, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse heard allegations of sexual abuse in 1069 schools, of which 44.2 per cent were government schools.

But advocates say the royal commission largely ignored government schools, focussing instead on religious bodies. Victoria’s Betrayal of Trust inquiry in 2013 did not look at government bodies.

Documents obtained via a Freedom of Information request by the Justice Party in January showed that since 2010, 381 claims were made for abuse that occurred between 1960 and 2018 in Victorian state educational settings.

By last year, the National Redress Scheme had received 1639 applications for abuse within government institutions, 318 of which made successful claims for abuse within state education facilities.

Fearnett said this week he believed perhaps 100 children had been abused at Beaumaris primary in the 1960s and ’70s.

“It’s bigger than people could possibly imagine,” he said. “I think we needed some people to stand up and go, ‘Hey, this wasn’t OK’.”

If you or anyone you know needs support, you can contact the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service on 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline 131 114, or Beyond Blue 1300 224 636.

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/how-one-man-s-story-shone-light-on-decades-of-school-sexual-abuse-20230629-p5dkef.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19103648

File: 5aff79d5d435cce⋯.jpg (243.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anti_immigration_protester….jpg)

>>18760753 (pb)

>>18971108

Nazi salute banned in Tasmania in an Australian first

MATTHEW DENHOLM - JUNE 30, 2023

Tasmania has become the first state to ban the Nazi salute, with six months jail for repeat offenders, in a move hailed by Jewish leaders but criticised by some free speech advocates.

The landmark legislation, similar to that foreshadowed in Victoria amid a national debate on how to tackle Neo-Nazism, was passed by Tasmania’s upper house on Thursday night.

“Nazis will not have a refuge here in Tasmania, and this sends a very clear message that Nazi symbols and salutes are not welcome in Tasmania,” said Attorney-General Elise Archer.

“Following the disturbing use of the Nazi salute during a demonstration in Victoria earlier this year, I have also ensured our reform includes the prohibition of the use of the Nazi salute.

“Nazi displays are a blatant breach of both our moral and community standards, and I am very pleased we have delivered these reforms, which is the first of its kind in Australia, that will help us deliver a safer and more caring community for all.”

The legislation, which comes as the federal government moves to outlaw Nazi symbols nationally, was hailed by the Anti-Defamation Commission.

“There is a very important message here to the neo-Nazis and white supremacists that is very clear and unequivocal: the law is no longer on your side,” commission chair Dr Dvir Abramovich told local radio on Friday.

“Tasmania will never again be a safe shelter and a haven for your murderous, genocidal ideology.”

However, some free speech advocates expressed concern about the law being a “simplistic distraction” from broader issues.

“It is an absolute distraction from the broader debate about the level of civil discourse in Australia,” said Isla MacGregor, Free Speech Alliance Australia spokeswoman.

“When focusing on legislation we are not focusing on the need for education on what constitutes fascist behaviour in our society. While this legislation focuses on right wing extremism, we also have left wing extremism in Australia.”

Tasmania’s Police Offences Act will now require that a person must not without a “legitimate public purpose” publicly display a Nazi symbol. The new law applies if the person “knows, or ought to know” that the symbol is a Nazi symbol.

There are exemptions for the display of swastikas as part of Buddhist, Hindu and Jain religious purposes, as well as for cultural, academic and educational purposes, and in opposition to fascism, Nazism or Neo-Nazism.

First offenders face a fine of up to $3,620 or three months jail, while these penalties double for subsequent offences.

Ms Archer said World War Two diggers and those who survived the Holocaust “appreciate the significant and terrifying impact these symbols have, and why they do not belong in our society”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nazi-salute-banned-in-tasmania-in-an-australian-first/news-story/0e8051f1d88eb2558f40b501a1829eae

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19103702

File: 7269b06dcde5a1d⋯.jpg (2.37 MB,3024x2268,4:3,Jeffrey_Epstein_associate_….jpg)

File: 8883fb4f248c703⋯.jpg (282.52 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0001.jpg)

File: cf5729d580612cd⋯.pdf (524.81 KB,gov_uscourts_ca2_57831_79_….pdf)

>>18998381

US urges appeals court to uphold Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking conviction

Jonathan Stempel and Jack Queen - July 1, 2023

NEW YORK, June 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. government has urged an appeals court to uphold Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and 20-year prison sentence for helping the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls.

In a Thursday night filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan, federal prosecutors said none of Maxwell's legal arguments about the fairness of her trial undermined their case, or justified a dismissal or new trial.

"The government's evidence at trial established that over the course of a decade, Maxwell facilitated and participated in the sexual abuse of multiple young girls," prosecutors said.

Arthur Aidala, a lawyer for Maxwell, had no immediate comment.

Maxwell, 61, is behind bars in Tallahassee, Florida, after a Manhattan jury convicted her in December 2021 on five charges for recruiting and grooming four girls for Epstein to abuse between 1994 and 2004.

Her accusers have said she and Epstein at first made them feel welcome in their orbit, before Epstein began demanding sexualized massages. Hundreds of women have said he abused them.

In her appeal, Maxwell, daughter of late British media mogul Robert Maxwell, accused prosecutors of making her a scapegoat because Epstein was dead and "public outrage" demanded that someone else absorb the blame.

Prosecutors rejected her claims that they waited too long to bring charges, and that Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement arising from alleged abuse at his Palm Beach, Florida mansion also immunized her.

They also said the trial judge had discretion to conclude that Maxwell's jury was fair and impartial, though one juror failed to disclose during pre-trial questioning that he had been sexually abused as a child.

"This case does not present the extraordinary circumstances that justify overturning a jury's verdict based on an error during voir dire," prosecutors said.

Epstein committed suicide at age 66 in August 2019 in a Manhattan jail cell, while awaiting trial for sex trafficking.

Others who were friendly with him have seen their reputations tarred or ruined, among them Britain's Prince Andrew and former JPMorgan Chase executive and Barclays chief executive Jes Staley.

JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank, which both had Epstein as a client, are paying a combined $365 million to Epstein's accusers over their work for him. The U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein had a home, is also suing JPMorgan.

Maxwell is eligible for release in July 2037, with credit for good behavior and the two years she spent in jail before being imprisoned.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-urges-appeals-court-uphold-ghislaine-maxwells-sex-trafficking-conviction-2023-06-30/

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66672526/united-states-v-maxwell/?order_by=desc

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.57831/gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104269

File: b89e248e9dd5a8c⋯.jpg (107.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,Yes_campaigners_have_tried….jpg)

File: 77dfcebc7f6b9ce⋯.jpg (108.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,While_the_voice_provides_t….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Worried about the Indigenous voice to parliament? Wait until you see the treaty

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - JULY 1, 2023

1/2

Australians will discover that if they vote Yes, the constitutionally entrenched Indigenous voice is not the conclusion of the intended makeover of our national governance arrangements. It is but the first step. While the voice is a major change to our Constitution, it is a mere enabler for activists’ overriding objective of a treaty with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

What few voters understand is that while the voice provides the necessary negotiating platform and leverage for activists to achieve the desired treaty, the new constitutionally enshrined race-based body is only secondary to the treaty. That is because the voice does not in itself give ATSI people the two things activists really want: namely, sovereignty and a form of self-government, and reparations. Only a treaty can do that. That’s why voters should realise that a Yes vote will likely guarantee many more years of agitation and division until, and perhaps even after, a treaty is achieved.

Anthony Albanese can be expected to do his usual Chicken Little routine, accusing those who are curious about what comes next as fearmongerers. The shame is that the Prime Minister is intent on ­concealing what comes next.

The next stages are obvious, not because I say so, but because this is what the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and the academic writings that have driven the treaty movement, say.

The Uluru statement is the starting point. It calls for a “First Nations Voice enshrined in the Constitution” but acknowledges this is not the culmination of their ambition. As the statement says, “Makarrata is the culmination of our ­agenda … we seek a Makarrata Commission to supervise a process of agreement-making between government and First Nations and truth-telling about our history”.

Given Albanese said in his election victory speech “on behalf of the Australian Labor Party, I commit to the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full”, Australians need to understand clearly what this treaty – the end point of the Uluru statement – means.

The definitive description of what the treaty means can be found in the 2020 edition of the book Treaty by George Williams and Harry Hobbs. Williams is a prominent legal academic from the University of NSW and was a member of the constitutional expert group that advised the government on the drafting of the proposed constitutional amendment. Hobbs is also a Sydney legal academic.

Sovereignty, the first aim of a treaty, raises fundamental questions about how the country will be governed in the future. As the Uluru statement shows, those pushing for treaty, including Williams, Hobbs and other members of the academic legal movement, do not accept the traditional view that we have in Australia a single sovereign entity in whom exclusive legal and political power is vested.

The High Court in Coe v Commonwealth in 1993 made clear that the Mabo decision does not support “the notion that sovereignty adverse to the Crown resides in the Aboriginal people of Australia. The decision is equally at odds with the notion that there resides in the ­Aboriginal people a limited kind of sovereignty.”

Williams’ and Hobbs’ response to this is to question Australia’s very legitimacy, saying the “reality” requires us to recognise that “the Australian nation-state has a legitimacy problem that remains unresolved”.

With that as their starting premise, it is not surprising that Williams and Hobbs call for a treaty which meets three conditions: “First, it must recognise Indigenous peoples as a polity, distinct from other citizens of the state on the basis of their status as prior self-governing communities. Second, the agreement must be reached by a fair negotiating process conducted in good faith and in a manner respectful of each participant’s standing as a polity. Third, the agreement must settle each party’s claims … (t)his must include the state recognising or establishing some form of decision making and control for the Indigenous people that amounts to a form of self-government.”

The first element requires us to accept that Australia is not one indivisible nation. It has two polities. The first and third elements call for some form of self-government by Aboriginal people.

While Williams and Hobbs are not prescriptive about what form that takes, they quote the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples which says Indigenous peoples have the “right to autonomy or self-government” in relation to their “internal and local affairs”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104271

File: 0b56023c0e01c51⋯.jpg (139.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,Worried_about_the_Indigeno….jpg)

>>19104269

2/2

As an example of what this might mean, Williams and Hobbs quote Canada’s treaty with the Nisga’a people which recognises the Nisga’a right “to exercise self-government over a range of local and internal affairs, including lands, language, culture, education, health, child protection, traditional healing practices, fisheries, wildlife, forestry, environmental protection and policing.”

There is a proviso, that says in the case of an inconsistency, federal or provincial laws prevail. But even with that, a similar treaty in this country would carve out for one group, based on race, a separate set of laws and policies that other groups do not have open to them. In other words, a treaty would divide Australia, not unify it.

What about reparations? In the foreword to Treaty, Mick Dodson says there must be a recognition “that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders have been injured and harmed through the colonisation process, and just recompense is owed”. Williams and Hobbs have a stab at estimating the size of possible financial settlements by referring first to the precedent of the settlement between Western Australia and the Noongar people in 2016 that gave the Noongar a package valued at $1.3bn consisting of “a sizeable land base, non-exclusive rights to resources over an extended area, a large and sustained financial contribution from the state government, and enhanced cultural heritage protection”.

More expensively, they point to the Timber Creek decision in 2019 in which “the Ngaliwurru and Nungali peoples were awarded about $2.53m for 53 acts carried out on 1.27sq km of native title land. As there are about 2.8 million sq km of native title holdings across the country, the potential total amount of liabilities will likely be in the ­billions of dollars.”

If a treaty, with its promise of sovereignty and self-government, accompanied by billions of dollars of reparations, is the main game, how does the voice help? The voice is the enabler because it delivers massive leverage when it comes to negotiating the treaty.

Yes campaigners have tried to distance themselves from Thomas Mayo, a prominent backer of the voice body, who said, in 2021, that the power of the voice was its ability to “punish politicians that ignore our advice” on legislation and funding.

But Mayo’s honesty is refreshing. “We need the power of the Constitution behind us so we can organise like we’ve never organised before,” he said that same year.

“We are sick of governments telling us no; we are sick of governments not listening to our voice. We are going to use the rule book of the nation to force them.”

Even if the government has no legal duty to consult the voice in the absence of a request to do so, the voice can easily create a duty to consult by the simple device of asking to make representations.

The voice need only send a letter on the first day of its existence to every government department, agency or body saying it wishes to make representations on all “matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”, asking for advance notice of all such matters and for the time and resources to consider such matters properly, and thereafter each such government entity will have a constitutional duty to comply.

Once those entities of executive government have complied with that request, the voice will have all the rights conferred by administrative law to ensure their representations are allowed due process and that decisions about them comply with the rigorous standards of administrative law. Failure to do so means any decision that is the subject of a representation may be stopped until litigation about compliance with constitutional and administrative law is completed. In short, the voice can, if it wishes, work to bring the processes of government to a grinding halt.

The activists who dictated the maximalist drafting of the proposed amendment – especially its reference to “executive government” – know this. Those few words will leave the government at the mercy of the voice when it comes to negotiating a treaty.

The lesson is this. A Yes vote in the referendum is not the end of the process but rather the starting gun to a long and divisive treaty negotiation where the voice has the whip hand. This will likely lead to separatism and bitterness, not ­reconciliation.

So if you are worried about the voice, wait until you see the treaty.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/worried-about-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-wait-until-you-see-the-treaty/news-story/780cacd9532701d4652c35b937fea21c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104284

File: e35be66ba9594d5⋯.jpg (54.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ben_Wyatt.jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Rio Tinto’s first Indigenous director Ben Wyatt says campaign against voice has likely had maximum impact

PAUL GARVEY and PAIGE TAYLOR - JUNE 28, 2023

The campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament has revealed its arguments and it has likely had it maximum impact­, ­according to Rio Tinto director Ben Wyatt.

“Obviously the No campaign is having an impact, but I’m still quite optimistic about the outcome,” Mr Wyatt said.

“I think the Yes campaign ­momentum will continue to increase and the No campaign, I think they’ve made their arguments, it’s probably had its maximum impact and then the Yes campaign certainly has the ­capacity now to deal with the concerns raised.”

Mr Wyatt is credited with pulling Western Australia out of debt as treasurer in Mark McGowan’s Labor government between 2017 and 2021. He is an Indigenous man and longtime advocate of the Uluru Statement from the Heart and its call for an Indigenous voice.

He believes the voice can help settle a national approach to public policy issues such as outstanding compensation liability for impacts on native title. Following a landmark ruling by the High Court in 2019 that compensation was payable, individual claims are being dealt with on a case-by-case basis in the Federal Court.

Mr Wyatt has joined the boards of resource companies Rio Tinto and Woodside. He is a nephew of former federal Liberal MP and Indigenous Australians minister Ken Wyatt and since leaving politics has spoken publicly about the need for an Indigenous voice to inform better policy.

“Clear, positive, optimistic messages about how the voice will have a direct impact on the lives of Aboriginal people is the clear message and that’s certainly the message I give when I give my speeches about the voice,” Mr Wyatt said.

“A campaign based around an unknown, if you like, or something new is much easier to campaign against rather than to campaign in support of something.

“But the simple proposition I always put back – if I find that point that we can all have consensus – is, do we accept that Aboriginal policy does not deliver the outcomes we’d like?

“And I think the overwhelming majority of reasonable Australians would agree with that concept. Do we have overwhelming proof that when we engage and speak with Aboriginal people around the development and implementation of policy gets a better outcome? Yes, we do. Which leads you to the fact that with the voice, there’s minimal downside risk and enormous, enormous upside opportunity.”

The capacity for the voice to advise on practical change is ­expected to be the focus of Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney’s speech to the ­National Press Club next week.

The Yes campaign is aware that it must show not only that ­Indigenous people have solutions to the problems in their communities, but that their knowledge has been disregarded if it ever reaches the top of the political and bureaucratic systems where important decisions are made.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/rio-tintos-first-indigenous-director-ben-wyatt-says-campaign-against-voice-has-likely-had-maximum-impact/news-story/d456f9889fab7733941fc40dde519bf2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104294

File: 4d6cb075efb9c27⋯.jpg (176.66 KB,1440x960,3:2,Stella_Assange_wife_of_Wik….jpg)

File: 01ff6a9a4369468⋯.jpg (121.29 KB,1440x960,3:2,Stella_Assange_wife_of_Wik….jpg)

File: c05a06e7d5f9dbd⋯.jpg (196.63 KB,1440x960,3:2,Stella_Assange_wife_of_Wik….jpg)

File: 912fc4c8f9936ec⋯.jpg (149.02 KB,1480x914,740:457,Stella_Assange_wife_of_jai….jpg)

File: 787a9c7586618c9⋯.jpg (175.25 KB,1440x1043,1440:1043,Buildings_are_reflected_in….jpg)

>>18934224

>>19099473

Pope meets with wife and family of Julian Assange, who says pontiff ‘concerned’ by his suffering

REBECCA PRECIUTTI - July 1, 2023

1/2

VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Francis met Friday with imprisoned WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s wife Stella, who said the pope’s gesture in receiving her was evidence of his “ongoing show of support for our family’s plight” and concern over her husband’s suffering.

In an interview with The Associated Press after the audience, Stella Assange recalled that Francis had sent a letter to her husband in March 2021, during a particularly difficult period.

“He has provided great solace and comfort and we are extremely appreciative for his reaching out to our family in this way,” she told AP. “He understands that Julian is suffering and is concerned.”

Assange has spent four years in Britain’s Belmarsh Prison fighting extradition to the U.S., where he faces up to a 175-year sentence on espionage charges for publishing classified military and diplomatic cables through WikiLeaks.

Before that, Assange had taken asylum for seven years in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in an attempt to avoid extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations.

Sweden dropped the sex crimes investigations in November 2019 because so much time had elapsed, but British judges have kept Assange in prison pending the outcome of the long-running extradition case.

The Vatican didn’t release any details of the private audience, other than to confirm that it happened. The Argentine Jesuit pope has long expressed solidarity with prisoners, frequently visiting detainees on his foreign visits and prioritizing prison ministry when he was archbishop in Buenos Aires.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104297

File: 2f3fa5390d6ced5⋯.jpg (151.2 KB,1240x744,5:3,Pope_Francis_greets_Stella….jpg)

File: b7557651187b80a⋯.jpg (178.72 KB,1200x800,3:2,_He_understands_that_Julia….jpg)

File: 95807d8dc6209f3⋯.jpg (182.37 KB,1194x796,3:2,La_famille_de_Julien_Assan….jpg)

File: 6d8547f5c063a28⋯.mp4 (9.01 MB,1280x720,16:9,Papa_Francisco_recebe_em_a….mp4)

>>19104294

2/2

Stella Assange, a lawyer who married her husband in prison in 2022, said she and Francis spoke in Spanish, and that she showed him two photos of their wedding. She called the audience “overwhelming” and noted that she brought along her mother, brother and the couple’s two young sons, Gabriel and Max, who were conceived during Julian Assange’s time in the embassy.

The visit came as Stella Assange has been seeking to drum up political support for her husband’s cause, including a visit to his native Australia last month. She said there was a growing consensus that his continued detention was inhumane.

“I have a lot of faith that the situation will change, and there are a lot of people around the world, from all parts of the world here and elsewhere, who are trying to get justice and see freedom for my husband,” she said.

Citing Australia’s intervention, human rights organizations and press freedom organizations, she said there was growing consensus that “what is being done to my husband is inhumane, that he is suffering, that he’s been in prison for four years for publishing true information revealing the killing of innocents and criminality and injustice.”

To his supporters, Assange is a secrecy-busting journalist who exposed U.S. military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan. American prosecutors allege he helped former U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning steal classified diplomatic cables and military files that WikiLeaks later published, putting lives at risk

https://apnews.com/article/julian-assange-wiki-pope-vatican-c71204816892210cb1fadfc24dc8ad7b

https://www.cmjornal.pt/mundo/detalhe/papa-francisco-recebe-em-audiencia-familia-do-fundador-do-wikileaks

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104349

File: aef48add6c96baf⋯.jpg (2.03 MB,5416x3610,2708:1805,Richard_Marles_meets_Solom….jpg)

>>19087765

Australia, Solomon Islands to review security pact after China moves in

Andrew Tillett - Jun 29, 2023

Australia and Solomon Islands will review their bilateral security treaty in a move experts say is aimed at checking China’s burgeoning security partnership with Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s government.

Following a meeting with Mr Sogavare in Honiara, Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday the treaty would be updated to reflect the “contemporary” security environment in the Solomon Islands, including the presence of an Australian-led Pacific nations peacekeeping force.

Mr Marles also confirmed the Solomons’ International Assistance Force (SIAF) – which was assembled after anti-government riots in November 2021 – could stay on in the country beyond the end of the year for the long haul, noting the need for elections in April to be conducted peacefully.

“We made clear that if it was the Solomons’ wish for SIAF, then Australia stood ready for that to occur,” Mr Marles said.

“And that we were happy to support a continuation of the SIAF’s presence in supporting the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force as necessary.

“We wanted to make completely clear that from the perspective of Australia, we stood ready for that support to be provided for as long as possible.”

The peacekeeping force – which also includes police and military from New Zealand, Fiji and Papua New Guinea – was activated after Mr Sogavare called for assistance under the bilateral security treaty with Australia in Honiara.

Riots had broken out in Honiara following initial peaceful protests against Mr Sogavare’s decision to switch diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China. Honiara’s Chinatown was targeted in the unrest with Chinese businesses and a police station among the buildings burnt down.

Despite the deployment of the Australian military and police to help Mr Sogavare maintain his grip on the power, he secretly negotiated a security agreement with Beijing, with news of the pact damaging the Morrison government when it emerged on the eve of the 2022 federal election.

Mr Sogavare justified the Chinese deal by claiming Australian forces had failed to protect Chinese-funded infrastructure but failed to offer proof of such inaction.

The Chinese agreement has meant Beijing sent police to train Solomon Islands officers, as well as provide replica rifles for training, water cannons and motorbikes. It also allows Chinese warships to stop over to resupply although Mr Sogavare insists he will not allow a permanent Chinese military presence.

Under its treaty, Australia has also provided guns to Solomon Islands police.

A statement issued by Mr Sogavare’s office following his meeting with Mr Marles on Wednesday said he called for a review of the “current security treaty between the two countries to take into account the changing security challenges faced by both countries”.

Mr Marles said Mr Sogavare did not outline changes he wanted to the treaty but Australia was “excited” by the review.

“The bilateral treaty that we have between our two countries is now a number of years old,” Mr Marles said.

“It really does need to be reviewed to take into account the contemporary security environment and the contemporary assistance that is being provided by Australia in support of the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force. When the bilateral treaty was first signed SIAF didn’t exist.”

The Lowy Institute’s Pacific Islands research fellow, Mihai Sora, a former Australian diplomat posted to Honiara, said since signing its agreement last year, “China has become an increasingly active security partner through the support they are providing to the police force.”

“That would be the concern of the Australian government, that we are seeing China push into that security co-operation space, potentially at the expense of the relationship Australia has been establishing in police support in Solomon Islands over the last decade,” he said.

“Australia’s position would be looking to shore up its role as the security partner of choice.”

Australian personnel were deployed as peacekeepers to Solomon Islands between 2003 and 2017 for the RAMSI operation.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/australia-solomon-islands-to-review-security-pact-after-china-moves-in-20230629-p5dkbv

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104379

File: fa1b8ccd476b721⋯.jpg (79.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,_Anthony_Albanese_will_be_….jpg)

Labor Left to push Anthony Albanese on free abortions and to close Nauru

JESS MALCOLM and SARAH ISON - JUNE 28, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese will be urged to provide free abortions across Australia, end offshore processing and close Nauru at Labor’s upcoming national conference, as the party membership pushes to government to adopt a more left-wing agenda.

The Australian can reveal the motions that will be put up by Labor for Refugees and the influential women’s group Emily’s List, which is co-convened by NSW Left faction MP Sharon Claydon.

With the Prime Minister reluctant to pursue abortion reform after the issue hurt Labor with faith communities in the 2019 election, Emily’s List will call for the ACT model of free abortions to be implemented nationally.

“For all residents regardless of whether they have a Medicare card or not,” one motion says.

Emily’s List – which successfully pushed for Labor to adopt gender quotas – says medical abortions cost between $75 and $150 and a surgical terminal can cost between $300 and $700.

The motion will also ask the government to pay for “travel costs for anyone living regionally and remotely when they are unable to access the service locally”.

The group is pushing another motion demanding that all publicly funded hospitals provide abortion services, while a third motion would allow nurses and midwives to prescribe the “abortion pill”.

If the motions win the support of a majority of delegates at the national conference in August, they will become part of Labor’s policy platform for the next term of parliament.

The National Labor Women’s Conference – held in Perth earlier this month and attended by Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Finance Minister Katy Gallagher – resolved that medical and surgical terminations should be fully funded and that nurses and midwives should be allowed to prescribe the abortion pill.

Labor in 2019 promised to make abortions more accessible, with then-opposition spokeswoman for women, Tanya Plibersek, unveiling a plan to make public hospital funding dependent on termination services being provided.

But the idea prompted anger from pro-life groups, and then-prime minister Scott Morrison said the debate would not be “good for the country”.

Following the disastrous 2019 loss, Labor dropped the idea and has sought to keep the debate away from the issue of free abortions and focused on “equitable access” to terminations between cities and regional areas instead.

In a motion expected to be put forward by Labor for Refugees at the ALP conference, obtained by The Australian, the group will call on Labor to agree “indefinite detention and boat turnbacks represent inhumane violations of Australia’s obligations under international law”.

The group – made up of ALP members and unionists at the ALP conference – will call on the Prime Minister to close all Australian facilities on Nauru and ­resettle any asylum seekers remaining there or in Papua New Guinea, and also urge him to commit to never re-establishing, expanding or promoting offshore detention.

It will also agitate for Labor to release all asylum seekers currently held in detention into a community-based processing system, and commit to resettle all newly arrived refugees in “urban-based reception centres”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104382

File: 9ea07665a1438b4⋯.jpg (223.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Labor_Left_to_push_Anthony….jpg)

>>19104379

2/2

The push to weaken Labor’s commitment to Tony Abbott’s Operation Sovereign Borders comes despite the arrival of 44,738 asylum seekers and the deaths of more than 1100 people at sea under the Rudd policy to scrap offshore detention.

With Labor so far resisting replicating the Rudd government’s policy blunder, opposition immigration spokesman Dan Tehan said the national conference would be a “real test” for Mr Albanese’s leadership.

With the Left faction likely to have a majority of delegates at the national conference for the first time in 70 years, Mr Tehan warned softer border policies would be “just one of many disastrous policies that they will seek to get the Albanese government to implement and it is of grave concern for the nation’s future”.

“As a result of Labor’s legacy, we had to deal with 5000 children in detention when we came to government – that is the price that this country will have to pay if Anthony Albanese does the wrong thing,” Mr Tehan told The Australian.

“The fact that the Left have got control of the Labor Party federally should start alarm bells ringing right across the nation.”

The Australian last week revealed the government will spend up to $350m a year to keep the Nauru detention centre open even when it is empty.

Labor has also been quietly emptying its Christmas Island detention facility since it was elected, prompting security experts to warn that a “flood” of ­asylum seekers could arrive on Australia’s shores at any time.

Labor for Refugees said boat turnbacks “violate Australia’s non-refoulement obligations and has led to the deaths at sea it claims to prevent”.

The push for free abortion follows the ACT in April becoming the first state or territory to offer taxpayer-funded abortions.

Labor’s current platform recognises the legal barriers and lack of affordability and accessibility for terminations and commits the party to “improve sexual and reproductive health for all”.

“Labor will … work with states and territories to improve legal protections, such as safe access zones for women seeking termination services, as well as expand service provision in the public system,” the 2021 platform states.

Peak health bodies including the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal Australian College of GPs have called for Labor to put fully funded abortions back on the agenda.

A Senate inquiry that reported last month also called for improved abortion access.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/labor-urged-on-free-abortions-and-to-stop-boats-close-nauru/news-story/9f49e0df2168efbfdb182ab73b4314ae

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104403

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19075550

Is she or isn't she a spy? The mother accused of working for Russia

60 Minutes Australia

Jun 25, 2023

The murky business of espionage usually exists in the shadows. But not this week on 60 MINUTES. In an intriguing and at times robust encounter, Tara Brown interviews a woman our spy agency, ASIO, claims is an agent tasked by Russia to gather sensitive information. Her name is Marina Sologub, and up until earlier this year she’d been living and working in Adelaide for three years.

Now she’s in immigration detention waiting to be kicked out of the country. As Brown reports, cases like this would normally be kept top secret, but quite remarkably a very bold Sologub is refusing to go quietly, denying accusations she’s a spy, and vowing to fight her deportation to the bitter end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9XoxcLsfHQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104491

File: a92ff29ed801bf3⋯.jpg (1.43 MB,3916x2610,1958:1305,Dr_Samantha_Crompvoets_has….jpg)

>>18934029

>>19037107

OPINION: I exposed war crimes among the SAS. A few weeks ago, my car was repossessed

Samantha Crompvoets, Sociologist - June 27, 2023

1/2

When my car was repossessed by debt collectors a few weeks ago, amid wrapping up loose ends after my company went into liquidation, it made me reflect on the life I once led and the one I lead now.

That war crimes committed on the other side of the world, and my involvement in unearthing them, could set off a chain of events that would bring down Australia’s greatest military hero, and somehow be part of the same narrative that now included my car being driven off by a stranger.

It wasn’t long ago that I had been a successful business owner with a string of government contracts.

For me, it all began on Australia Day 2016. That was the day I submitted a report to army chief General Angus Campbell that would trigger the biggest inquiry into war crimes in Australia’s history. It would also be the day that David Morrison, chief of Army from 2011 to 2015, would be awarded Australian of the Year. Chair of the committee that chose the winner was Special Forces soldier Ben Roberts-Smith.

The first time I heard mention of war crimes among Australian Special Forces soldiers in Afghanistan was in 2014, in a small, partially furnished office in an Army barracks. I’m a sociologist and I had been contracted by the army to undertake a number of research projects. I was speaking with an army chaplain about domestic violence prevalence. The conversation went well beyond the initial topic. It was the first time I heard of the “serious misconduct” that was occurring within SAS patrols in Afghanistan. The chaplain described returning from deployment “a broken man”, having tried and failed to have his concerns taken seriously.

It wasn’t until late 2015, in one of the first interviews I did for a project in Special Operations Command, which oversees special forces units, that the chaplain’s story came back to me. That project began as an examination of Special Operations capability. It ended in a report on war crimes that led to the Brereton Report and news stories that resulted in Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith unsuccessfully suing this masthead for defamation.

The Federal Court last month found Roberts-Smith was a liar and murderer who engaged in war crimes. At the time of my initial report, I had no idea what that report would eventually cost me, personally and professionally.

For I now realise that what I was coming up against was more than the horrific acts of a few rogue soldiers. It was the cult of brand “SAS”; the cult of the male warrior. In this cult, unsanctioned violence is justified, encouraged and celebrated.

It seemed my report on the SAS had triggered a threat to some Australian men’s masculinity. I’d dared question their heroes. These loud voices would hound me for years. The attacks on me to be bashed, killed, tortured, and my livelihood destroyed came via Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, email, text and phone call. Mostly the backlash came from those not in the military, but some were ex-military and younger white male soldiers – all of whom appear to idolise the SAS as a stronghold of hypermasculinity.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104496

File: 94b1fc296fb24ee⋯.jpg (970.24 KB,2592x3888,2:3,Samantha_Crompvoets.jpg)

>>19104491

2/2

When the war crimes allegations emerged, then-defence minister Peter Dutton said he had made it “very clear” to Defence that I should not be awarded further contracts. That he did not want the military to be “distracted by things that have happened in the past”. My credibility was questioned repeatedly by Jacqui Lambie and reiterated in the Murdoch press.

It became politically inconvenient for me to keep speaking about the SAS issues. In 2021, I had written an essay about how misconduct becomes entrenched in organisations and how it spreads, and I used the SAS as a primary example. The Australian Government Solicitor unsuccessfully tried to stop my essay being published.

In a letter I received from the government solicitor’s office shortly after publication, I was told my conduct and public statements had “harmed the Commonwealth”. The result was that my ongoing work with the government was “terminated for convenience”.

The implications for me, my family, my business, and my staff were profound. The message had been sent to the department loud and clear that I was now a liability and a risk. No work would follow. Work in the pipeline was stopped indefinitely. I’d told the truth, so they cut me out.

After that my business collapsed and my mental health declined amid the endless stream of misogynistic threats through social media. Work from other organisations was not forthcoming. I gather this was because most businesses hire consultants to tell them what they want to hear, not uncover what is really at the heart of their problems.

I once heard Special Forces described as the “weeping sore” of the Army that no one was prepared to tend to. But there is a cost to organisations that leave issues to fester. It teaches others in the organisation that bad behaviour is acceptable, that those who engage in it will be protected, that to dismiss it is the norm. Such attitudes seep through an organisation and rot it. When the day finally comes that these problems must be addressed, the damage is far greater for all involved.

But the greatest takeaway from my experience is a personal one. That despite the cost, I would do it all again. I am grateful for the trust placed in me by soldiers and officers who gave accounts of egregious acts of violence and cover-ups. I have never taken it for granted and I have felt an unwavering duty of care to them.

Samantha Crompvoets is a sociologist and expert in organisational culture.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/i-exposed-war-crimes-among-the-sas-a-few-weeks-ago-my-car-was-repossessed-20230621-p5diay.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104518

File: e16cb61ffe6b735⋯.mp4 (11.25 MB,640x360,16:9,Japan_Australia_US_stage_j….mp4)

>>18946058

Japan, Australia, US stage joint drill

NHK WORLD-JAPAN - June 30, 2023

Japan, Australia and the US are holding an annual joint drill in Queensland, northeastern Australia. It's aimed at streamlining defense cooperation as China ramps up its maritime activities.

A record-high number of some 2,500 personnel from Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force, the Australian Army and the US Marine Corps are taking part in the exercise, called "Southern Jackaroo." It started on June 22.

The Australian military says the drill is being staged under the scenario that an island near Australia is occupied by foreign hostile forces.

Simulated urban combat operations were shown to reporters on Friday.

Australian armored vehicles fired at buildings occupied by the enemy, played by US Marines.

Working in close cooperation, members of Japan's GSDF and Australian soldiers neutralized the enemy and recaptured the buildings.

Australia has been stepping up defense partnerships with countries it believes share its values, including a free and open Indo-Pacific.

Australia will host a much larger drill, joined by 12 other countries, including Japan, the US and some from Europe, starting late July.

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20230630_41/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104539

File: 50a28b884b72c5f⋯.jpg (1.18 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_war_games_took_place_i….jpg)

File: 8527a6e707dc05a⋯.jpg (1.62 MB,4577x2721,4577:2721,Japan_and_Australia_conduc….jpg)

>>18946058

>>19104518

Australia and Japan conduct war games in contested waters, closely watched by Chinese military

Andrew Greene - 30 June 2023

An Australian warship and surveillance aircraft have conducted military exercises with Japan in the South China Sea under the close watch of the People's Liberation Army.

The war games, which took place over the past weekend in strategically contested waters, focused on tactical operations, including anti-surface and anti-air warfare, but were not publicised by the Australian Defence Force (ADF).

Two warships from Japan's Maritime Self Defence Force (JMSDF), helicopter destroyer JS Izumo and destroyer JS Samidare, took part in the bilateral training drills after making a port visit to Vietnam as part of an Indo-Pacific Deployment.

HMAS Anzac is also currently on a five-month regional presence deployment to South-East Asia after its 200-strong crew departed Western Australia in April for various navy-to-navy engagements.

Flight data obtained by the ABC reveals two RAAF P-8A Poseidon aircraft flew over the South China Sea from the Clark Air Base in the Philippines on June 24, although only one of the surveillance planes was formally part of the military exercises.

Sources with knowledge of the two-day exercises have confirmed China's People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) was in "the vicinity" of the activity but did not interact directly with the Australian warship or aircraft.

The Commander of Japan's first surface unit for the Indo-Pacific Deployment 2023, Rear Admiral Takahiro Nishiyama, said his nation and Australia were considered "special strategic partners".

"Like our country, Australia, an ally of the United States, is a 'Special Strategic Partner' in the Indo-Pacific region, sharing not only universal values but also strategic interests in security," the rear admiral said in a statement.

"The relationship between the JMSDF and the Royal Australian Forces has never been stronger and more important, and the JMSDF will promote further improvement of interoperability and mutual understanding with the Royal Australian Navy in order to improve the security environment in the Indo-Pacific region."

In response to questions from the ABC, the Australian Defence Department confirmed "HMAS Anzac sailed in company with JS Izumo and JS Samidare while interacting with the RAAF P-8A Poseidon", but offered few other details.

The department declined to comment on any nearby Chinese military presence, but a spokesperson said the ADF "routinely interacts with foreign militaries when operating in international airspace and international waters as a matter of course".

During its regional deployment, HMAS Anzac is also helping enforce United Nations Security Council sanctions on North Korea as part of Operation Argos.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-30/australia-war-games-in-contested-waters-watched-by-china/102541828

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104595

File: 1beb266c9298f2a⋯.mp4 (15.84 MB,640x360,16:9,356649371_224356810427197_….mp4)

Talisman Sabre Facebook Post

29 June 2023

TS23 - Message from Exercise Directors

“An important part of a significant military exercise like Talisman Sabre are the planning events that are required to train together in dynamic situations across an area as large as northern Australia.”

Hear from the Director of Exercise Talisman Sabre, Brigadier Damian Hill, as he shares more about the deep planning that goes into #TalismanSabre2023.

This year, more than a dozen nations personnel are set to take part in the Australia-United States-led bilateral exercise.

Partner Nations Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany and Indonesia will work together to enhance interoperability and strengthen key strategic partnerships.

https://www.facebook.com/talismansabre/videos/ts23-message-from-exercise-directors/313240851096344/

Planning key to success of Talisman Sabre

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2023-05-15/planning-key-success-talisman-sabre

>Talisman Sabre

>MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104755

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18755037 (pb)

>>19087791

‘I don’t get another chance to get justice’: Leifer accuser

To Nicole Meyer — and to so many Australians — sex abuse principal Malka Leifer’s not guilty verdict was unfathomable. The fallout has been devastating.

CAMERON STEWART - June 26, 2023

1/5

At 3pm each Monday, the time of the verdict, Nicole Meyer takes a video to record her feelings.

Big brown eyes stare sadly at the camera, her voice all but a whisper, as she bares her heart about what unfolded in Melbourne’s County Court on Monday, April 3.

“Ten weeks since the verdict came out, 10 weeks of feeling my heart begin to break at 3pm every Monday, the knowledge of the pain of that hour,” she says in one.

“The pain that it brings into me spreads throughout my body … it’s so hard for me to handle the ‘not guilty’.

“My mind refuses to go there. I feel like I need to shout my truth off the rooftops and make the jury believe that what happened to me happened. And yet I don’t get another chance,” she says as her voice breaks.

“I don’t get another chance to get justice. I don’t know how I’m going to move on from this, I don’t know how to accept it, I don’t know how to feel that it’s not my fault.”

These heart-wrenching videos are a part of Nicole’s attempts to process what to her, and to so many Australians, was unfathomable.

On April 3, a jury, after deliberating for 32 hours over nine days, convicted Malka Leifer, the ­former principal of the ultra-­Orthodox Adass Israel School in Melbourne’s Elsternwick, of 18 counts of sexual abuse.

Leifer’s conviction was the ­triumphant culmination of an international campaign by three sisters – Nicole, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper – to extradite their former principal and teacher from Israel and bring her to trial in Australia.

Their quest for justice became a 13-year saga that spanned from here to Israel and involved prime ministers, extraditions, appeals, political corruption, private investigators and subterfuge. A plea hearing on Wednesday is expected to set the date for Leifer’s sentencing.

But as the three sisters held hands in the court listening to the jury’s verdict, there was a terrible sting in the tail.

The 18 guilty verdicts against Leifer related only to the abuse of Dassi and Elly. For each of the five charges of rape and sexual abuse relating to Nicole, the jury found Leifer not guilty.

The three sisters, so united in their marathon quest for justice, suddenly found themselves landing with a thud on different sides of the law.

Nicole had fallen through the cracks, her legacy separated ­forever from her sisters by a jury verdict that had to be respected even if it didn’t pass the pub test given what Leifer did to Dassi and Elly.

“I keep hearing ‘not guilty’ looping around in my head,” ­Nicole says. “I think the verdict has changed everything for me. It’s a very different journey to the one I expected.”

Verdict day

The morning of the verdict was a time of hope for the sisters, with an upbeat Nicole taking a video of herself in the car on the way to the court saying they were all “utterly ready for whatever is to come and let’s hope it’s today … onwards and upwards”.

As the jury prepared to deliver their verdict after the six-week trial, the 56-year-old Leifer sat alone and stone-faced in the back of the court wearing a black headdress as the three sisters linked hands.

The first five charges were all related to Nicole and included four counts of rape and one of indecent assault by Leifer between 2003 and 2006 when Nicole was a ­student and then a teacher at the school.

But as each charge was read out, the words “not guilty” rang through the courtroom.

“My heart dropped,” Nicole ­recalls. “I could have crumpled to the floor and literally not been able to move or I could stand up and be strong with my sisters.”

Nicole tried to stay strong as she squeezed her sisters’ hands harder and fought back tears. But then, moments later, there was also huge relief.

On 18 of the ­remaining 22 ­charges – sexual penetration and indecent assault all relating to her sisters – the jury declared Leifer guilty.

Their former principal, who had been accused of so many crimes against the sisters for so long and who had tried to evade Australian courts for years after being sent by her school board from Melbourne to Israel in 2008, was finally a convicted sex offender.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104761

File: 287fdbcce7e8d07⋯.jpg (124.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_I_don_t_get_another_chanc….jpg)

File: b8fa54d1211b455⋯.jpg (104.56 KB,1777x1000,1777:1000,Former_Melbourne_school_pr….jpg)

>>19104755

2/5

As her feelings bounced ­between relief and pain, Nicole glared at Leifer in the dock.

“I turned around and was like ‘I don’t care what the jury or anyone thinks, I know what you did to me and I want to meet your eye and show you that you haven’t broken me’,” she says.

“She refused to look at me and that’s fine because she knew I was looking at her.”

After Leifer was led away, the sisters left the court and found themselves in an elevator with barristers and lawyers. “It was the lift ride from hell, I’m about to break down and you’re surrounded by people,” Nicole recalls.

The sisters went into a room where she recalls one of the prosecutors giving Nicole words of encouragement.

“She said something like, ‘If you hadn’t done it then your sisters would not have been able to do it, it was the three of you together’. I said ‘OK, thank you’.”

Then the sisters were left alone for the first time as the media pack waited outside the court.

“I think all of us were in shock,” Nicole says. “Elly was crying and I was standing there telling them ‘It’s gonna be OK guys, we got guilty, It’s OK, I’m OK. We got this’.

“But I think they were heartbroken for me. It was such an emotional moment after so many years. Because I didn’t get guilty, it wasn’t a joint feeling of celebration that we could enjoy together. It was heartbreak. It was bittersweet. It was too many things at once.”

Minutes later the sisters fronted the media outside the court. Holding hands with them, Nicole said: “Yes it’s bittersweet, but she is guilty, I believe in myself. My sisters believe in me.”

Nicole says she held herself ­together for the rest of the afternoon as the sisters checked into a hotel in Southbank to spend the night together. But then about 8.30pm, when Nicole got a call from her therapist, who had helped guide her through so much, it became too much.

“I sat on the floor in the hotel room and broke down for about an hour,” she recalls. “It was the first moment since the verdict that I allowed myself to actually feel pain.”

Coming to terms

Ten weeks later, the day after ­Nicole made her weekly Monday video, she is sitting in her apartment in Melbourne’s Balaclava wearing the same black and white headband she wore in the video.

In contrast to that clip, she is smiling and relatively upbeat, ­reflecting a journey of emotional peaks and troughs since the court’s verdict.

“I think I was in a state of denial for the first five weeks, it took me a long time to accept it,” she says. “Getting ‘not guilty’ means I will never quite get that closure and I have to work even harder to just move on.”

She says she has been buoyed by the support of others, including sexual assault victims who tell her she is an inspiration.

But she says she also feels that she let people down because she wanted to be an example to sex victims in the ultra-Orthodox community “so that people who are ultra-Orthodox feel OK to come out, go to the police and have a chance at justice”.

Despite the obvious pain that she still feels about the verdict, she says she doesn’t regret anything she has done since she and her sisters first gave police statements about Leifer in 2011.

“I don’t regret any part of the journey,” she says. “I’m working not to let (my verdict) discredit everything we’ve done because I feel like we’ve done so much.”

Although the not guilty verdict means Nicole cannot read out a victim impact statement in court, she plans to write one anyway and read an abbreviated version outside the court at Wednesday’s plea hearing.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104773

File: b18b9c8127b8c76⋯.jpg (431.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sisters_Nicole_Meyer_Dassi….jpg)

File: e0e56a197d12e62⋯.jpg (105.29 KB,1648x1236,4:3,Malka_Leifer_is_taken_from….jpg)

>>19104761

3/5

Dassi and Elly are also still coming to terms with the fate that has befallen the sister who fought by their side during their long campaign to bring Leifer from ­Israel to an Australian court.

“I feel a profound sense of injustice that my sister was denied the validation and closure she ­deserved,” Dassi says. “The pain of witnessing my sister’s truth and courage dismissed, failed by a system that had already caused her so much harm had left me unable to look back at our shared journey for justice without frustration, anger and sorrow. It breaks my heart to witness her suffering and the weight of pain she carries having to come to terms with this unfairness.”

So what happened in the courtroom that saw the jury dismiss ­Leifer charges relating to Nicole while upholding those relating to Dassi and Elly?

While only the jury knows the true reasons for their verdicts, ­Leifer’s defence team, led by barrister Ian Hill, argued that the charges relating to all three sisters were “erroneous, imagined and/or fabricated”.

Hill sought to discredit the ­stories of Dassi and Elly story, but he zeroed in especially on Nicole’s evidence during his closing argument.

The charges relating to Nicole against Leifer included one of ­indecent assault in 2003 and four counts of rape in 2006, twice in ­offices at the Israel Adass School and twice at a school camp in Victoria’s central highlands.

Hill focused on what the ­defence said was a key inconsistency in Nicole’s evidence against Leifer. When Nicole gave her first statement to police back in 2011, her allegations of sexual abuse against Leifer did not mention digital penetration. Yet when ­Nicole gave a second police statement in March 2021, she said ­Leifer had digitally penetrated her, a claim she had also made to a psychiatrist in 2014 and to a psychologist in 2017.

When quizzed about the two police statements in court, Nicole said she was traumatised when she gave her 2011 statement and that it was only through therapy in the years that followed that she could articulate the full extent of her ­alleged abuse.

“So the trauma caused you in that first statement to say nothing about digital penetration?’ Hill asked Nicole in cross-examination

“On the day I gave my first statement I found out I was pregnant with my youngest. That is the only way I remember that day as clearly as I do,” Nicole replied. “It was extremely difficult for me to talk (about) anything for the first time.”

Hill asked: “But 10 years later you were able to give a statement to the police for the first time about it?

Nicole replied: “Correct, because I had been to therapy and I’m working on processing some of that trauma.”

The defence also criticised ­Nicole’s recollection of various dates of sexual incidents and the court focused on alleged abuse by Leifer only from 2003 to 2006, rather than what Nicole says was a full 6½ years of abuse by her former principal.

“The cross-examination was brutal,” Nicole recalls. “He just tore apart and questioned every single detail of the abuse in a way that almost made you feel that the abuse didn’t happen the way you know it did.”

She says the defence “mocked” her for saying that her full recollection of what happened only came to her after her 2011 police statement.

“Unfortunately that’s how abuse works: the brain blocks parts and in 2011 when I made that statement I wasn’t mentally able to handle being raped,” she says.

Prosecutors said her inability to fully process what happened early on was probably helped by her sheltered upbringing in the ultra-Orthodox Adass community where sex was a taboo topic and sex education was non-existent. It was this complete ignorance of ­acceptable boundaries that made Nicole and her sisters, in the world of prosecutor Justin Lewis, “ripe for the picking”.

Nicole believes judges in sexual assault cases need to help educate jurors about the complex nature of trauma and memory.

“Judges need to give better and more empathetic instructions to juries to help them understand that trauma is not linear and trauma can evolve and be more deeply understood by someone over time,” she says.

She says juries often don’t get to hear the full context of abuse. She alleges Leifer affected every area of her life, socially, physically and emotionally.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104782

File: 7c454cad0d16ea8⋯.jpg (350.54 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Nicole_with_sisters_Dassi_….jpg)

File: e0e9228e7465ee6⋯.jpg (87.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_principal_Malka_Lei….jpg)

>>19104773

4/5

Nicole says that after the cross-examination she felt a “crippling self-doubt” that she had failed to properly explain the alleged abuse by Leifer as clearly and persuasively as did Dassi and Elly.

“It is a feeling that I have let myself down,” Nicole says. “I’ve worked so hard to get ­justice but maybe I wanted it too much and that’s why I didn’t get it.”

She says a member of the prosecution team told her they were sorry that they couldn’t persuade the jury beyond reasonable doubt and that Nicole should not blame herself for the outcome.

“But of course I’m going to take some of the blame because I was on the stand and because I am hard on myself,” she says.

An Orthodox life

Nicole was the third of seven children born to parents in the small ultra-Orthodox Adass Jewish community of about 2000 people that mostly lives within a few blocks around East St Kilda in southeast Melbourne.

Raised with neither television nor internet, they had little ­knowledge of the world outside their highly religious community. Their mother was abusive and the children, especially the three sisters, relied heavily on each other growing up.

“I remember Nicole’s deter­mination, in whatever way she could, to shield her youngest ­siblings from harm,” Dassi recalls.

Nicole alleged that Leifer, a school principal who at that time was highly respected within the Adass community, began to sexually abuse her in 2003, when she was in year 10 and that the abuse continued until 2007, just a year before Leifer was spirited out of the country.

It took some time before the three sisters learned that each was being abused by Leifer and in 2011 they each made individual statements to the police.

Three years later, Victoria Police charged Leifer with 74 counts of child sex abuse and she was placed under house arrest in Israel. But for years Leifer avoided extradition to Australia by feigning mental illness to delay proceedings, a process that was helped by Israel’s then deputy health minister Yaakov Litzman, who pressured doctors to declare Leifer mentally unfit for trial.

The tide began to turn only in 2017 when one of Nicole’s ­classmate’s sisters took a photo of Leifer, who was supposed to be mentally unfit to be extradited, standing casually in a street in ­Israel.

“I sent that picture to Dassi and it went viral,” Nicole recalls.

Nicole, Dassi and Elly, backed by supporters such as former ­Victorian premier Ted Baillieu, launched a campaign in ­Australia and Israel to bring Leifer back.

When private investigators later filmed Leifer doing normal things such as shopping, the issue became a thorn in the Australia-Israel relationship.

Nicole and her sisters visited ­Israel four times as part of their campaign to bring Leifer back, with then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull calling on his counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu to help extradite Leifer.

It was not until January 2021, almost 13 years after her arrival in Israel, that Leifer was finally ­extradited back to Melbourne to face trial.

‘Deplorable’ conduct

Despite Nicole’s grief about the failure of her own charges against Leifer, she says some positive things have happened since the trial.

The first was that another of Leifer’s alleged victims, not related to the sisters, launched a civil case against the school. That case was settled out of court, but it gave ­Nicole hope that other alleged victims of Leifer might feel that they can come forward.

“I was relieved that there was one more person because it’s been Dassi, Elly and I since 2011 with no one else,” she says.

The other development was that Victoria Police backflipped on a previous decision and moved to reopen its investigation into the circumstances of Leifer’s sudden departure from Australia in March 2008.

The investigation is focusing on a meeting of the school board and community leaders at the house of the late businessman Izzy Herzog on March 5, 2008.

The board had become aware of at least eight separate ­allegations of abuse involving Leifer and girls at the school. In attendance was then school board president Yitzhok Benedikt, then school board member Meir Ernst, the late barrister Norman Rosenbaum, psychologist Vicki Gordon and a teacher Sharon Bromberg.

The group put Leifer on speakerphone and put the allegations to her. Leifer was then told she would be stood down but it was agreed that, rather than report her to police, the principal should be spirited out of the country.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19104788

File: ccaf18bb9536a28⋯.jpg (590.78 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,_This_is_nine_years_of_fig….jpg)

File: 8d41861724b6163⋯.jpg (80.87 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Daniel_Andrews_welcomes_Ma….jpg)

>>19104782

5/5

Dassi Ernst, the wife of school board member Meir, asked a travel agent to open at 10 o’clock that night to book a plane ticket to Israel. Less than four hours later – at 1.20am – Leifer and four of her children flew to Israel. The school paid for her ticket.

In his 2016 judgment in a civil case against the school, then ­Supreme Court judge Jack Rush described the board’s conduct as “deplorable” and said it was ­“motivated by a desire to conceal her wrongdoing and confine and isolate the conduct and its ­consequences to within the Adass community”.

Dassi says the actions of the board in facilitating Leifer’s ­escape “not only betrayed the ­pursuit of justice and caused ­significant ­delays, it also perpetuated the ­anguish we were forced to endure and hindered our path to healing”.

Nicole says she doesn’t want anyone to go to jail over the ­incident, but she does want ­accountability.

“I do want an open, transparent authentic apology because it caused us years of additional ­trauma and fighting for justice,” she says.

Unlike Dassi and Elly, Nicole has remained in the ultra-Orthodox community along with her husband and her four children aged 11 to 16.

But she is concerned that many in that community are still more willing to defend their collective reputation than support victims of sexual abuse.

Nicole remembers the deafening silence within the Adass ­community when she and her ­sisters first went public with the ­allegations.

“That silence to me indicated a huge lack of support so I withdrew from social engagements within the community,” she says.

Even last month, when the ­unnamed victim settled the civil suit against the Adass Israel School, several protesters in cars turned up outside the victim’s home unhappy that she had launched the claim.

“It was very confronting for me to see that and realise that things have not changed much at all,” ­Nicole says.

She says the school itself, ­despite issuing an apology to the sisters after the verdict, never apologised to the sisters at any stage previously during their 15-year quest for justice.

Nicole says she now wants to focus on getting her life back on track. She plans to study law next year and hopes to one day become a criminal prosecutor as well as helping victims of sexual abuse.

But mostly she just wants to move beyond the shadow of Leifer and the verdict.

“I am 37 and she has been in my life since I was 16; that’s more than half my life,” she says.

“I wanted so badly to move past having Leifer in my life but it is a lot harder now. I have to figure out a life without her in it. That is the hardest part for me.

“But I know my truth and I’m grateful for the support from those who believe me.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/my-heart-breaks-at-3pm-every-monday-the-sister-apart/news-story/0dc0ede6200ef08d3469530d7010ae80

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrrglfFUAcc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19105014

File: 1e1ff9948c0fd7c⋯.jpg (733.96 KB,2048x1536,4:3,After_School_Satan_Club_Su….jpg)

File: e7e2b9dc8c60c7c⋯.jpg (695.89 KB,1400x1500,14:15,355864178_647383134082502_….jpg)

File: 4197d8c72f6051a⋯.jpg (143.52 KB,852x316,213:79,Q_4942.jpg)

File: 6e3f1ed5cd87f7d⋯.jpg (399.3 KB,852x1148,213:287,Q_3967.jpg)

File: 879a1134c1c79a7⋯.jpg (86.99 KB,932x932,1:1,Q_3967.jpg)

>>18875811 (pb)

>>18804793 (pb)

>>18875853 (pb)

After School Satan Club launches the first-ever summer club

Shabeli Acevedo - Jul. 1, 2023

BINGHAMTON (WBNG) - On Friday, June 30, the After School Satan Club launched its first summer club at the Broome County Public Library. The club was able to meet for the first time in the Southern Tier in May.

At the club, the kids made cat scratch pads made of recycled material. Campaign Director of the After School Satan Club, June Everett, said what goes on in the club is inspired by the 7 Satanic Tenants.

“The summer program is exactly what they’re doing for the afterschool program,” Everett. “I envision each summer program being unique, pretty much catered to what our volunteers want to do and what our kids that come to the club want to do.”

In February, students at Homer Brink Elementary were sent home slips announcing the club would be starting at the school in March. There wasn’t a place for the club to meet, so they had to push it back a few months.

Director of the Broome County Public Library, Josias Bartram, said they follow the First Amendment carefully and don’t want to intrude on anyone’s freedom of speech

“Our meeting rooms are available for any non-profit to book and that’s what happens with the Satanic Temple,” said Bartram. “This is not a Satanic Temple, and as with any non-profit that books our rooms, we’re not in any way endorsing them,” said Bartram.

https://www.wbng.com/2023/07/01/after-school-satan-club-launches-first-ever-summer-club/

https://www.facebook.com/thesatanictemple/posts/647383140749168

---

Q Post #4942

Oct 30 2020 10:38:45 (EST)

https://time.com/collection/great-reset/

This is not about R v D.

This is about preserving our way of life.

If America falls, the World falls.

Patriots on guard.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4942

---

Q Post #3967

Apr 15 2020 13:06:42

These people are pure evil.

This is not about politics.

You are ready.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3967

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19105135

File: 07b039abdfdebba⋯.jpg (239.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Donald_Trump_and_his_son_D….jpg)

File: c61173d744248d2⋯.jpg (375.33 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Trump_supporters_outside_t….jpg)

>>19037159

>>19044166

Anti-democrat Donald Trump Jr should not be allowed into Australia

TROY BRAMSTON - JULY 1, 2023

1/2

Donald Trump Jr, the eldest son of disgraced former US president Don­ald Trump and executive vice-president of The Trump Organisation, will be in Australia for a promotional tour speaking at events in Sydney on July 8 and continuing to Brisbane and Melbourne.

But Trump should not be granted a visa to enter Australia because he fails multiple character test requirements under the Migration Act. Trump is an anti-democrat who encouraged the overturning of an election. He is a conspiracy theorist who spread misinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic. And he leads an organisation found guilty of tax fraud and document falsification.

This is not about denying freedom of speech or de-platforming a person with controversial views but about upholding the integrity of our immigration laws as they relate to non-citizens. Everybody should have the right to express their views provided they do not encourage illegality, engage in hate speech, sow division or propagate harmful conspiracy theories.

It is completely unacceptable to allow Trump Jr to come to Australia to give voice to the undermining of democratic elections, disrespecting the rule of law, denigrating people based on their race, religion or sexuality, and provoking political unrest. He has done all of these things and will do so in Australia, in search of a willing antipodean MAGA audience.

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil can use her authority under the Migration Act 1958 and Migration Regulations 1994 to “refuse to grant a person a visa if the person does not pass the character test”. The legislation defines the character test at subsection 501(6) of the act.

It stipulates that if the person has an association with or is a member of an organisation that has been involved in criminal conduct, or the reasonable suspicion of such conduct, they can be denied a visa to Australia. Trump Jr clearly meets this requirement. Last December The Trump Organisation was found guilty of 17 counts of tax fraud, which included falsifying business records and conspiracy.

In January this year the company Trump Jr co-runs was fined $US1.6m ($2.4m) for systematic and extensive tax avoidance. Allen Weisselberg, the former chief financial officer of The Trump Organisation, pleaded guilty to tax evasion and was sentenced to five months in jail.

It has been well documented that Trump Jr was involved in the attempt by his father to overturn the 2020 US presidential election and helped encourage the riot at the Capitol in January 2021, which resulted in death, injury and destruction. The son played a key role in the failed re-election campaign of his father, and remains a MAGA supporter and surrogate.

When it was clear the 2020 election was lost, Trump Jr tweeted that his father should “go to total war” and “expose all of the fraud, cheating” that had taken place. There was no evidence of electoral rigging by US Democrats. Moreover, the encouragement of “total war” was inflammatory and potentially dangerous.

In the days after the election, Trump Jr urged White House chief of staff Mark Meadows via text message to try to overturn the election. He outlined several options, including sending alternative slates of electors to the US Capitol for the electoral college certification, to sabotage the electoral process. “We have multiple paths,” he texted Meadows. “We control them all.”

On January 6, the day of the insurrection at the US Capitol, Trump Jr spoke to supporters about “being in this fight with us” to stop the election being stolen and the country going to hell. Off stage, Trump Jr filmed family and staff excitedly watching the rally. That rally was the spark that led to the riot at the US Capitol and the attempt to disrupt the electoral college vote. This is evidence of being associated with another organisation or group involved in criminal conduct under the Migration Act.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19105152

File: cb62030696b3847⋯.jpg (731.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Trump_supporters_clash_wit….jpg)

File: 8b01e16e426974b⋯.jpg (263.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Donald_Trump_listens_as_Ni….jpg)

>>19105135

2/2

A quick scan of Trump Jr’s social media feeds or appearances on far-right television and radio and podcasts shows a range of offensive statements that invoke white supremacist, homophobic and anti-Semitic language and imagery. He even accused Joe Biden of being a pedophile. He recently, and falsely, claimed US agencies were mobilising to “interfere in the 2024 election” to stop his alleged criminal father reclaiming the presidency.

During the pandemic, Trump Jr repeatedly downplayed the severity of the virus, ridiculed mask wearing, social distancing and lockdowns, and endorsed the quackery that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment rather than vaccination. This is dangerous nonsense and runs counter to the policies implemented by Coalition and Labor governments in Australia.

The Trump Jr tour, with “special guests” Nigel Farage and senator Alex Antic, is being organised by Turning Point Australia. It is surprising that otherwise credible organisations such as Ticketek are selling tickets and the Aware Super Theatre at Darling Harbour Sydney is the Sydney venue.

The Migration Act is clear that if there is a risk the person entering Australia would vilify segments of the Australian community, harass or intimidate people, or “incite discord” with their views, then they should be denied entry on character grounds. There is plenty of evidence that this is what Trump Jr plans to do in Australia.

Those who previously have been denied entry to Australia include tennis player Novak Djokovic after failing to meet vaccination requirements; rapper Snoop Dogg for drug and firearm convictions; anti-vaxxer Kent Heckenlively; Johnny Depp and Amber Heard after failing to declare their dogs Pistol and Boo; far-right activist and Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes; and far-right rabble rouser Milo Yiannopoulos.

Trump Jr is, arguably, a more serious threat on character grounds than some of the above and is certainly in the league of Yiannopoulos and McInnes.

Ultimately, the decision whether to allow Trump Jr entry into Australia to promulgate election denialism, defend corporate criminality, spread misinformation and quite likely vilify sections of the Australian community, and thus incite division and discord, is one for O’Neil. It is not too late to act, Minister.

Troy Bramston is a senior writer and columnist with The Australian. He has interviewed politicians, presidents and prime ministers from multiple countries along with writers, actors, directors, producers and several pop-culture icons. He is an award-winning and best-selling author or editor of 11 books, including Bob Hawke: Demons and Destiny, Paul Keating: The Big-Picture Leader and Robert Menzies: The Art of Politics. He co-authored The Truth of the Palace Letters and The Dismissal with Paul Kelly.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/antidemocrat-donald-trump-jr-should-not-be-allowed-into-australia/news-story/fafe1cad56b2c06a434371651b610aab

https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

>You attack those who threaten you the most.

>What does FEAR look like?

>What does PANIC LOOK like?

>These people are stupid.

>Enjoy the show!

https://www.trumplive.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109625

File: 9a6eee22a73cd52⋯.jpg (104.34 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Pat_Dodson_says_the_time_a….jpg)

File: d271b48ed184475⋯.jpg (217.35 KB,1023x797,1023:797,Vote_over_time.jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Voice defeat will undermine Australia’s standing on world stage: Dodson

Anthony Galloway - July 2, 2023

1/2

Labor senator and Indigenous elder Pat Dodson says Australia will have no integrity to criticise China over its human rights record if the Voice referendum fails, warning the country needs to have “clean hands” on the international stage.

In his first interview since taking medical leave in April to fight a serious illness, Dodson said winning the referendum would be difficult but he believed Australians were “better than those who are currently running the No case”.

He also said elevating the recognition of Indigenous Australians in the Constitution over the creation of the Voice – as some Yes campaigners have suggested – is the wrong approach.

Support for the Voice in most public polls has dropped significantly since Dodson went on leave. The Resolve poll conducted for this masthead this month showed support has fallen below 50 per cent on the Yes or No question for the first time.

Thousands of Australians will rally at more than 25 locations across the country on Sunday, as the Yes side tries to reset the campaign after months of political debates in Canberra.

Australians will vote later this year on the referendum to enshrine in the Constitution a Voice to parliament, which will make representations to parliament and the government on issues that impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Dodson, who is known as the Father of Reconciliation, said his time away from Canberra had made him reflect on the consequences for Australia’s international standing if the Voice is defeated.

“The nation stands to lose if this fails,” said Dodson. “It’s not just the first peoples: our nation, in the eyes of the international community, will lose.

“Our integrity with our neighbours will certainly be undermined – that’s the Pacific. We will give ammunition to our enemies in other places, or people that are opposed to us internationally.

“We will go through a process of wondering why a simple matter could not be achieved in such a sophisticated nation as ours.”

Asked whether Australia could continue to criticise China over its treatment of Uighurs and Tibetans, Dodson said: “We’d have no integrity, absolutely no integrity.”

Dodson, who is Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s special envoy for the implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, said Australia wasn’t coming to the international stage with “entirely clean hands” and its colonial past “can be exploited by our competitors and by those who want to demean our integrity”.

“Under this Labor government, we’re showing we are engaging with the Pacific, we’re not frightened by the atrocities that are going on in Ukraine,” Dodson said.

“We’ve got to go to the international forum with substance, not just with intellectual ideas and strategies, as a people of substance – and that’s what will happen with a Yes vote.

“Because people will say: ‘You as a modern democracy have faced your legacies, your worst fears, and you’ve worked your way through it, and you’ve stood the challenge’.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109627

File: 84adfd653187fb5⋯.jpg (91.21 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Dean_Parkin_says_a_lot_of_….jpg)

>>19109625

2/2

There has been a growing divide within the Yes movement over whether to talk more about constitutional recognition and less about the Voice. Leading Voice architect Noel Pearson this month said there was an urgent need to elevate the goal of recognising Indigenous Australians in the Constitution above the creation of the Voice advisory body.

Dodson said recognition and the Voice were equally important.

“I think you’ve got to link both matters. I don’t think selling people half a chocolate is the thing to do,” he said.

“This is about the recognition, and giving people the capacity to make representations that are advisory to our parliament and executive.”

Campaigners for the Yes side have been trying, since the legislation setting up the referendum passed parliament earlier this month, to remind voters that the Voice came out of the bottom-up process of the Uluru Dialogues.

Dodson said getting the debate out of Canberra and into communities would be difficult and it would take strong advocacy from a number of organisations and individuals.

If the Voice is defeated, Dodson said “I don’t think I’ll despair,” but it would be a “great day of reckoning for Australians”.

“I do think Australians are better than those that are currently running the No case,” he said.

“I think they’re the rump of the worst. Unfortunately, they are very loud and they are very intrusive.”

The Yes campaign will hold a series of rallies on Sunday, including in Sydney’s Prince Alfred Park and the Victorian Trades Hall, from 11am to 2pm.

Yes23 director Dean Parkin said the campaign would ramp up now that the parliamentary process in Canberra was over.

Asked about the trajectory of the public polls, Parkin said the legislative process in setting up the referendum was always going to be a “necessary but tricky period”.

“The dominant conversation was people arguing in Canberra about this. That’s not something that attracts people into the conversation, that’s not something that engages people in a very positive way,” he said.

“It’s not going to go away completely, but some of that noise is not as prominent and allows us to have these events, it allows us to sign up more volunteers to the campaign.”

Parkin said his side always knew the debate was going to be contested and it would be difficult to win the referendum.

“There are a lot of people out there who haven’t heard about this,” he said.

“But we do see it [the next period] as an opportunity because when you actually give the information and you do reach out to those people who have been previously disengaged, there’s actually a lot of goodwill.”

Parkin said that the referendum was about both recognition and the Voice, “so that is absolutely at the centre of what we are campaigning on”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/voice-defeat-will-undermine-australia-s-standing-on-world-stage-dodson-20230630-p5dkqw.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109631

File: 96130268097a655⋯.jpg (89.41 KB,862x575,862:575,The_Yes_campaign_for_the_I….jpg)

File: b8d572ffc962cdc⋯.jpg (54.31 KB,862x575,862:575,Yes23_campaign_director_De….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Indigenous Voice to Parliament Yes camp intensify campaign as referendum draws closer

Rebecca Trigger - 2 July 2023

1/2

The Yes campaign for the Indigenous Voice believes there is enough time to turn around negative polling results revealing softening support for constitutional change.

The Yes campaign — spearheaded by the organisation Yes23 — is due to intensify this weekend with a series of community events, amid criticism it has failed to build the same head of steam as the No campaign despite the chance the referendum could be held in less than two months.

Veteran campaign analyst Kos Samaras, a director at the Redbridge group, says the Yes campaign should have ramped up its efforts sooner.

"In an environment where people are just not really keeping an eye out for this type of information, it really takes a fairly long time to actually get cut through," he said.

"Particularly in the … next three months, where in excess of 600,000 households in the country have been moved from their fixed rate to variable interest rate payments, … we expect to see a lot more stress in the economy, and it's less likely for people to pay attention to things that are not directly affecting them."

He also questioned how effective community barbecues and similar events would be in reaching people not already invested in these issues.

"These community events will be attended by people who we define as having a lot of social capital turn up," he said.

But Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin said they were focused on engaging the broader Australian community and there had been a lot of work behind the scenes.

"We've got more than 10,000 people signed up as active volunteers already, more than 500 organisations that have pledged their support to vote Yes and to work with their members to vote," he said.

"People can expect to see a lot more movement and colour from the campaign as we amplify and escalate these efforts."

He said the Yes campaign wasn't focused on polling, but on the people in the community who hadn't turned their minds to the up-coming referendum.

"For many people, Indigenous affairs is not always top of mind, especially now when a lot of Australians are doing it tough with things like cost of living," Mr Parkin said.

"We just want to be able to bring the very simple information about what recognition is, the fact that this is recognising 65,000 years of history and it's time, in 2023 we should do that.

"Also talking about the practical elements of the Voice, of why a Voice to Parliament is going to make an impact and a change in the lives of Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander peoples in the community.

"It doesn't matter whether you're Indigenous or non-Indigenous, in fact, it doesn't even matter whether you're a Yes or No supporter, everyone agrees that the current status quo for Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander people isn't good enough.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109632

File: f83e71331fc80d9⋯.jpg (80.11 KB,862x575,862:575,Political_analyst_Kos_Sama….jpg)

>>19109631

2/2

"Something's got to change."

But Getup chief executive Larissa Baldwin-Roberts — whose organisation is also running a campaign for yes — said they couldn't afford to "stick our heads in the sand" about polling results.

"They (the No camp) are running a very persuasive campaign," Ms Baldwin said.

"They're targeting the audiences that they know are unsure about this thing, and really meeting them with messaging … that persuades them into confusion or persuades them to a no.

"That is impactful, and I think that they've got momentum in the work that they're doing."

Advance Australia, who are organising the No campaign under the sub organisation Fair Australia, declined an interview with the ABC but said in a statement that they were not fazed by the "relaunch" of the Yes23 campaign on the weekend.

“Our strategy has remained the same all along," the statement said.

"Fair Australia has been holding its own supporter functions since April and will continue to do so around the country.”

Fair Australia argues the proposed constitutional change will be divisive, will undermine the one-vote democratic system and is not the right way to tackle systemic disadvantage faced by Indigenous Australians.

The referendum will ask the Australian people whether they support a change to the constitution that will allow the creation of a body 'the Voice' to make representations to parliament and the government on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

For a referendum to pass in Australia it requires what's known as a "double majority" — more than 50 per cent of the national population and a majority in at least four out of the six states must vote yes.

The vote is widely expected to be held in October but could fall anytime after August 19.

Earlier this week Newspoll returned its first majority support for the No vote, with 47 per cent indicating they would not support the Indigenous Voice referendum, and 43 per cent indicating they would.

It also showed a state-by-state breakdown with only New South Wales and Victoria returning majority Yes votes, while Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania fielding majority No votes.

Other polls have returned mixed results but the national Resolve poll, conducted for Nine newspapers, also put no on a slim majority — 51 no to 49 yes.

Mr Samaras said if he was running the Yes campaign he'd focus on information but also an emotive pitch examining personal stories of people succeeding in life because they were listened to.

He said the No campaign could rely on a lack of community understanding of what is being proposed.

"[Peter] Dutton's pitch is actually becoming quite effective, he's raising concerns around the wording, its application and tying it up into it being an issue not at the forefront of most Australian's minds," he said.

Neither Yes23, Advance Australia or Getup would answer questions about the size of the war chest they have to fund their respective campaigns.

BHP, Rio Tinto and Wesfarmers have declared multimillion-dollar donations to the Yes cause.

Fair Australia said it was almost entirely funded by "ordinary Australians" and not "ASX-listed multinational corporations".

Due to Australian electoral rules it will not be clear until well after the referendum what individuals and firms made financial contributions to each side of the campaign.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-02/indigenous-voice-yes-campaign-intensifies/102541932

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109647

File: e6a9ee723bc30ba⋯.jpg (182.8 KB,1279x720,1279:720,More_than_10_000_people_ar….jpg)

File: b3f88bf512db7a6⋯.jpg (153.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Thousands_of_Yes_vote_supp….jpg)

File: 1f97268408ab2fb⋯.jpg (177.69 KB,1280x720,16:9,Attendees_heard_from_speak….jpg)

File: 96f93967736291b⋯.jpg (73.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Scott_Darlow_performs_for_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Voice to parliament: Yes23 holds rally blitz to bolster support for referendum

JESSICA WANG - JULY 2, 2023

1/2

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has issued a rallying war cry for Australians to support an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, as more than 25 community rallies gathered on Sunday.

“The eyes of the world are truly on Australia and I have every faith Australians will rally and vote yes in this referendum,” she said at the Brisbane event.

“(The Voice) will be chosen by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and it will give advice to not only the executive government, but also the parliament.

“What we’re being asked in a few months time is not what the colour of the carpet is going to be, but whether or not we believe Aboriginal people should be recognised in the founding document of this nation: the Australian Constitution. And the answer is yes.”

Campaign organisers Yes23 said more than 10,000 people had registered their attendance for the events.

By 11am, crowds had gathered at locations all across the country for the events which coincided with the start of Naidoc week.

Also speaking at the Brisbane rally to about 400 attendees, campaign director Dean Parkin said he was excited the conversation on the referendum was being moved out of the Canberra bubble and into the community.

“For far too long this campaign, this referendum conversation, has been locked up in Canberra with politicians,” he said.

“100 per cent our sole focus is taking that conversation (to the people) because that’s where this campaign belongs, that’s where this referendum belongs.”

In Melbourne, Wurundjeri and Gunnai Kurnai Elder, Uncle Ringo Terrick urged unity in his speech to attendees.

“Let’s join hands and really walk into the future together as a united country and as a united voice,” he said, speaking at the Victorian Trades Hall.

Despite the grey skies and intermittent showers, supporters turned up in the thousands.

Other speakers also included Victorian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation boss Aunty Jill Gallagher, Australian Council of Trade Unions President Michele O’Neil and Indigenous educator, activist and musician Scott Darlow, along with performances from Darlow and Robert K Champion.

Ahead of the rally, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews gave his full support to The Voice.

“It’s just about listening to Aboriginal people. Instead of telling them what will work for their kids – and their health, education, their businesses and businesses – instead we listen,” he told reporters at an earlier press conference.

“I’m not here to tell people how to vote, I can just share the reasons why I’m voting yes, in the hope they discover the reason why they should vote yes.”

In Sydney, the rally in Prince Alfred Park was addressed by both the NSW Leader of the Government in the Upper House, Penny Sharpe, and opposition spokesperson for health, Matt Kean.

Ms Sharpe said the NSW government was in full support of the “yes campaign,” and urged people to have conversations with their friends, neighbours, and family.

“All over Australia, there’s a fire that’s been lit in households, in businesses, in workplaces, in my multicultural communities,” she said to a packed crowd.

“Everyone is having the conversation about how do we step forward together with Aboriginal people in Australia. We want to do this, we need to do this and now we finally have the chance to do this.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109648

File: 1cccd3ab88aaf6d⋯.jpg (176.51 KB,1280x720,16:9,Supporters_braved_Melbourn….jpg)

File: d7691b520905480⋯.jpg (156.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Victorian_Premier_Daniel_A….jpg)

File: aa8f11d98a0336f⋯.jpg (135.03 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_concurrent_Come_Togeth….jpg)

File: 1be4e9c70a6b2a4⋯.jpg (300.27 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Thousands_of_people_gather….jpg)

>>19109647

2/2

Unlike the government, the NSW opposition have not committed to a unified stance on The Voice, which means Coalition members are allowed to campaign “in line with their own views and those of their community”.

Speaking at the Sydney rally, Mr Kean urged people to vote yes, and said he wanted “every young Australian, Indigenous or not” to have “more opportunities with greater choice”.

“That’s what we’ve got an opportunity to do here. I want an Australia that’s better and stronger and we can do that by voting yes,” he said.

“We can’t have an Australia where one group of Australians gets less opportunities, because they’re Indigenous.

“Now we’ve got an opportunity to bring people together and move our country forward and create more opportunities for everyone.”

Key rallies were organised at inner-city locations in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide and Cairns, with dozens of other smaller community events set for the same time.

Mr Parkin said the events were an opportunity for people to learn more about the campaign and hear from speakers about how a yes vote will affect Indigenous communities first hand.

“Community momentum for a Yes vote continues to build, and I encourage Australians to head to one of these events and find out how they can get involved in our campaign between now and referendum day,” he said.

“We want to reach as many Australians as possible with our positive message that this proposal will give Indigenous people a real say on matters that affect them, whether that be across health, housing or education.

“We want everyday Australians, whether they live in Devonport, Wollongong, Perth or Cairns to go along to an event today, to get informed and join this positive movement.”

According to the latest Newspoll conducted for The Australian, support for the “Yes” vote has diminished to 43 per cent, while support for the “No” vote had increased by four points to 47 per cent.

The polling results marked the first time those opposed to The Voice polled stronger than those in favour of the referendum passing.

While the date of the referendum has yet to be confirmed, Australians are expected to be asked to hit the polls and vote to amend the constitution to recognise Indigenous Australians by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice before the end of the year.

On Sunday, Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton hit out at corporate companies donating money to the yes campaign, accusing them of chasing social media clout and lacking a “significant backbone”.

The comment comes as Wesfarmers, Rio Tinto and BHP have all donated $2m to the Yes23 campaign.

“There are debates that corporate Australia should be involved in and at the moment I don’t think they’re paying, you know, due consideration to the views of their workforce to the views of the community,” he told Sky News,

“There are a lot of CEOs and chairs who have very different conversations with you in private than what they say publicly because they’re worried about ESG (environmental, social and governance) and remuneration packages being voted down at AGMs and it’s time they started to stand up for what’s in our country’s best interests.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/voice-to-parliament-yes23-holds-rally-blitz-to-bolster-support-for-referendum/news-story/dc28a8023d43e90b96b59c750ac882a8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109659

File: 0e47da74f75e7ca⋯.jpg (168.63 KB,634x981,634:981,Olympian_athlete_Cathy_Fre….jpg)

File: ecf38f1d555d11c⋯.jpg (54.78 KB,634x793,634:793,The_Yes_campaign_are_shelv….jpg)

File: 7735610f73371f7⋯.jpg (109.28 KB,634x591,634:591,Question_and_answer_sample….jpg)

File: fe4e94aca1b643b⋯.jpg (133.15 KB,634x836,317:418,Pointers_in_the_how_to_gui….jpg)

File: f0d83cac585a400⋯.jpg (131.2 KB,634x750,317:375,Talking_points.jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

The simple reason the 'Yes' campaign is dumping celebrities in a major backflip - as supporters are schooled in how to avoid debates about the facts: 'Aussies don't like being told what to do'

BRITTANY CHAIN - 2 July 2023

1/2

Yes campaigners will not be putting celebrities at the front and centre of their campaign in an extraordinary backflip.

In April, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese intended to recruit Indigenous superstars, but the campaign has since shifted its focus to ordinary Australians.

A source in the campaign said fears were raised using celebrities would backfire and the shift was made because Australians don't like being told what to do.

Indigenous sporting superstars such as Cathy Freeman, footballers Adam Goodes and Johnathan Thurston and tennis legends Evonne Goolagong-Cawley and Ash Barty were hand-selected earlier in the year to promote the Yes campaign.

The stars will still endorse the Voice, however they will not play a prominent role in the campaign.

The shift comes after it was revealed activists have been given an official script on how to make an 'emotional connection' with voters to win over their support.

A nine-page Yes23 'how-to' guide, obtained by Daily Mail Australia, offers 14 scenarios for tough conversations with voters and the best way to handle them in order to win their votes.

The common concerns campaigners are expected to run into include criticisms it won't make a practical difference in the lives of Aboriginal people, that 'no one will explain how it will work' and fears that it won't address real issues for Indigenous people.

The scripted Yes campaign answers are focused on promoting the idea that the Voice is a 'stepping stone on the path to justice', will be above the 'usual partisan politics' and is an 'important practical step'.

A referendum will be held between October and December, asking the Australian public whether a Voice to Parliament - an Indigenous advisory body - should be constitutionally enshrined.

Mr Albanese has described this as a 'modest request from the heart' and an 'offer' he hopes all Australians will embrace.

Yes23 volunteers are told to emphasise creating an emotional connection with voters.

They are instructed to have 'belief in your own support' - rather than focusing on having all the answers or engaging in an 'intellectual debate'.

Volunteers have been given a three-pronged approach to swaying friends and family.

They are told to ask open questions, empathise with others' positions and loop the conversation back to pro-Yes arguments.

Open-ended questions suggested in the guide include: 'Have you heard much about the Voice to Parliament? What do you think about it?'

Campaigners are encouraged to 'Explore the other person's thoughts, without offering your own. Like: That's interesting. Where did you hear that? How did you feel when you heard that?

'The aim here is to take what you've heard, and 'equalised' and connect those things with your reasons to vote yes.

'We're redirecting the positivity we've built in the conversation towards our conclusion, messages and values.'

For questions about what practical difference the Voice could make, the campaign provided an example answer which states: 'The issues that a Voice body will advise on are issues like education, health, employment and land management.

'In the past, First Nations people haven't had opportunities to have input into policies. Policies where politicians have made decisions on behalf of First Nations people have failed. Our children and grandchildren will have better services and opportunities if they get a seat at the table when policies are being developed.'

New Yes ads will include messages such as: 'We have always lobbied and tried to empower our people to take responsibility for their actions but sometimes the system lets us down'.

Another will state: 'Those people in Canberra, they hardly know anything. They’re good at ticking boxes … they don’t come to community to see the struggles we face'.

There has been fierce criticism over the government and Yes campaign's unwillingness to provide extensive detail for a proposal which will permanently change the Australian constitution.

Yes23 states it 'doesn't make sense' to conduct a detailed, thorough consultation about the ins and outs of the advisory body until receiving a mandate from the people to do so.

Instead, campaigners are being urged to consider the unifying message behind the proposal - closing the health and literacy gap, improving the quality of life for the nation's most disadvantaged and bringing the nation together.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109661

File: 5b97d89f6bf238c⋯.jpg (86.97 KB,634x480,317:240,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: afb0e6bf86a694f⋯.jpg (80.24 KB,634x425,634:425,A_referendum_needs_a_manda….jpg)

File: 92c661c9d1e1ce4⋯.jpg (102.24 KB,634x818,317:409,Prominent_Voice_campaigner….jpg)

File: 4363ee37dae9ab4⋯.jpg (265.9 KB,634x795,634:795,Liberal_Julian_Leeser_supp….jpg)

File: 1c320091ca577f3⋯.jpg (33.2 KB,306x397,306:397,Some_of_the_pointers_in_th….jpg)

>>19109659

2/2

The Liberal Party oppose the constitutional element of the proposal, but have insisted several times they are in favour of legislative change to help First Nations people.

Ahead of the referendum, both sides of the debate are firing up their arguments and beginning an intense period of campaigning. Pamphlets have started to be circulated in the community and politicians are making their positions known.

Support is sitting at about 43 per cent according to the latest Newspoll, and just two states are tracking to vote yes. A referendum needs a mandate from the majority of people in the majority of states to pass.

As campaigning for both sides heats up, Yes voters have been encouraged to 'use simple language and avoid jargon' when engaging with No voters.

But the Yes23 campaign said 'people you know - whether friends or family, people at work, your church, your local sporting club – will be far more influenced by a conversation with you about this than anything they see or hear from a third party.

'These kinds of conversations can sometimes be confronting, but they can also be surprising, respectful and affirming.'

The script encourages Yes voters to use 'simple, everyday language' and to 'take a moment before conversations to remind yourself of your intentions'.

'Many people don't have a strong understanding of how the constitution operates or is different from laws and policies of the government.

'Rather than assuming the people you're having a conversation with know how it all works, we have to use simple, everyday language.'

'Most of the conversations we have day-to-day are not the most effective for persuading someone to reconsider their position.

'People are unlikely to change their perspective just because someone has 'corrected' them - regardless of how much they like or respect that person.'

And to those who worry the referendum debate is taking focus off securing 'other real commitments', the campaign group says: 'First Nations people have been calling for meaningful change for many years. This referendum is a step in the right direction.

'This is a stepping stone on the path to justice. After the vote, it will be up to our communities across the country to shape what the Voice to Parliament looks like.

'There will be a long consultation process to make sure the model effectively shapes government policy and secures better outcomes for all of us.'

Campaigners are provided this example if they're confronted by friends and family who don't think it will do anything to actually help disadvantaged communities: 'There's no denying that if a majority of Australians voted YES it would be a powerful unifying moment in Australian history, and a big forwards step towards reconciliation.

'A constitutionally enshrined Voice will be above the usual partisan politics – representatives will be solely focused on the issues and will be directly accountable to Indigenous people on the ground.

'Having constitutional recognition enshrined in the constitution through a Voice to Parliament is not the only thing that needs to be done, but it's an important practical step towards getting things right in the future.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12249581/Voice-Parliament-Yes-campaigners-given-script-handle-pros-cons-questions.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19109666

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18949906

>>19075501

Ukraine ambassador asks Foreign Minister Penny Wong to visit Kyiv amid calls for more weaponry

Jake Evans - 2 July 2023

Ukraine's ambassador to Australia has made a public invitation for Foreign Minister Penny Wong to visit the besieged capital Kyiv and gain a fresh perspective on the conflict.

Ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko told ABC Insiders he wanted Senator Wong to see the war for herself, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did in July last year.

"When you visit it gives you a different angle," Mr Myroshnychenko said.

"It gives you a bit of hands-on, I mean I've seen it with your prime minister, I was there on that trip … we were able to hear the stories out there, shared [by] people under the Russian occupation."

The ABC has contacted Senator Wong for comment.

Ukraine has been campaigning for Australia to support the war effort by sending its Hawkei armoured vehicles, which like the Australian Bushmaster vehicles have gained a cult status among Ukrainians.

Last week the federal government announced $110 million in additional support for Ukraine, funded from within defence's existing budget, which included 70 military vehicles, artillery ammunition and humanitarian support.

But the package did not include Hawkeis, or Ukraine's other requests for Abrams tanks or additional Bushmasters.

The Opposition said the government had made a miserly offer, in particular, in offering to send M113 personnel carriers, which date back to the Vietnam War.

The prime minister said defence officials had advised against sending Hawkeis, because of the risks their brakes could fail and replacement parts could not be supplied.

Mr Myroshnychenko was not deterred, and said it would benefit Australia to test the Hawkeis in the field.

"Ukraine is the best testing ground, where else can you test your military kit?" he asked.

"Many different defence industry companies throughout the world are testing their equipment in Ukraine now.

"We make it better, we make your defences much stronger, and that's a great contribution to help Ukraine."

Mr Myroshnychenko repeated that sending more Bushmasters would also help save more lives.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is set to attend the NATO Summit in just over a week time.

Ambassador says countries benefiting from war have made greater contributions

The ambassador did not weigh into whether weaponry provided last week was sufficient, saying only Ukraine was grateful for whatever it could receive.

But he did note other countries benefiting from higher commodity prices due to the war had also made greater contributions.

"Many of our partners have inadvertently benefited from the increased prices for commodities, and, of course, this is all the result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine," he said.

"Countries like Canada, Norway, Australia, their increased prices for commodities have really done well for their budgets, and we see how these countries are stepping up their support.

"Just earlier this year, Norway committed a multi-billion, multi-year program of support for Ukraine."

Mr Myroshnychenko said countries should do what they can to end the war as quickly as possible.

"The longer it drags on, it brings more death, more destruction, more misery," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-02/penny-wong-invited-to-see-ukraine-war-firsthand/102551978

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuHAE_9GM3Q

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19114941

File: dbe42c3d8b74876⋯.jpg (687.53 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Wakka_Wakka_dancers_at_the….jpg)

File: fc2b6fe8aee5a26⋯.jpg (291.12 KB,1280x720,16:9,Thousands_of_supporters_of….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Yes campaign pushes power of the positive

There was no brass band, not a bell or whistle to be heard when the pro-voice forces finally took a no-frills pitch to the people.

JAMIE WALKER - July 2, 2023

1/2

There was no brass band, not a bell or whistle to be heard when the Yes campaign on the voice finally took its no-frills pitch to the people.

It was more a day on the green with the kids dancing in the warm Brisbane sun while Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney applied the soft-sell to the question that threatens to divide the nation ahead of a referendum later this year.

As Ms Burney put it, addressing a receptive crowd of 2000 in Roma Street Parklands, the nay-sayers were trying to complicate what really was a very simple proposition.

“It came from dialogues of Indigenous people right across the country. It came from the constitutional convention six years ago. It came as an invitation to you, the Australian people,” the minister said of the proposed voice to parliament and executive government.

“And this is your referendum. It is not the plaything of politicians.”

Strap in, because the ride to the vote, most likely in October following the football finals or possibly in December as Australia slides into Christmas – the decision was still in the hands of the Prime Minister, Ms Burney insisted – is going to be quite the rollercoaster.

To date, the No campaign has stolen a march on the affirmative side: louder, more emphatic and consistently sharper in its prosecution of the case against the voice. Newspoll confirmed the trend last week, showing the referendum would fail if conducted now.

Team Yes had been waiting for the referendum question to pass parliament before launching its answer on Sunday at 25 community-based rallies, coast to coast, coinciding with the start of NAIDOC Week.

Aboriginal leader and voice co-architect Noel Pearson mingled with Yes supporters at a rally on the Sunshine Coast, and the nation’s biggest pro-voice event at Sydney’s Alfred Park was attended by politicians from across the political spectrum, from ex-NSW Liberal treasurer Matt Kean to federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek.

The scene in Brisbane was in keeping with the Yes side’s strategy to argue its case sotto voce without celebrities or sporting bigshots to do the talking, a picnic minus the pointscoring.

There was a sausage sizzle, live music, and polite queues for the port-a-loos. Music and movement was supplied by the Wakka Wakka dancers from Cherbourg community, north of Brisbane.

Turrbal elder Joe Kirk told how the grassy reserve had once been part of a swamp that ran all the way to Charlotte St in the city, where Aboriginal women gathered water lilies and the girls were ritually initiated.

“This is a spiritual and sacred place,” Uncle Joe said.

The kids were shushed as people leaned forward to hear him. “We’ve come here for the word, yes,” he said. “We learnt that word when we were brought up on the missions: we said ‘yes’ to the superintendent, yes to the white man. Today we can say ‘yes’ to the referendum because we want to say ‘yes’.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19114943

File: 26de55732130a60⋯.jpg (132.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Linda_Burney_addresses_the….jpg)

File: f8e5b9e40288620⋯.jpg (190.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,Noel_Pearson_at_the_Sunshi….jpg)

>>19114941

2/2

Ms Burney moved through the crowd shaking hands and exchanging words with a friend here, a familiar face there, before shedding her Canberra-weight coat and taking the microphone.

First thing to know was that the voice would make a practical difference to the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. “It is not OK that my life expectancy is 10 years shorter than my non-Aboriginal sisters,” she said.

“It is not OK that our babies are born at the wrong birth weight – they’re too small.

“It is not OK that educational outcomes are smaller. And it’s certainly not OK as I saw … two weeks ago, 30 people living in a two-bedroom home. That is not the country we want.”

Taking aim at criticism that there was insufficient detail about the voice for Australians to vote on, Ms Burney said: “I’m supposed to know what colour the carpet is going to be. But it will be an independent body, it will be chosen by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and it will give advice not only to the executive government, but also the parliament.”

Yes campaign director Dean Parkin appealed to people to join the movement. Don’t sit back or wait for an invitation; don’t be distracted by the “noise in the news”, he said. “It’s really simple: if only one in 10 of you here today are able to have a yarn with two people in your families or your communities and bring them on board to Yes, we will win this referendum.”

Ms Burney refused to be sidetracked from her upbeat message. She declined to respond to reporters’ questions about Peter Dutton’s criticism of big corporates such as BHP, Rio Tinto and Wesfarmers for each donating $2m to the official Yes23 campaign, saying: “This referendum is not about me, not about the Prime Minister, not about Peter Dutton.”

It was about making history and making the country better.

“How often do we get the chance to put our shoulder against the wheel of history and give it a bit of a shove? It comes once a lifetime and this is our time. It is your time to lean against the wheel of history and lean into it hard,” she said, as applause rippled through the crowd.

“This is about moving the conversations forward. This is about moving Australia forward for everyone. This can be a moment and will be a moment of unity, a change that we can all be proud of.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/yes-campaign-for-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-calls-to-supporters-in-lowkey-rallies/news-story/142a19b1d0104096ec0ca870cfa3841d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19114955

File: 066f6447caba76e⋯.jpg (83.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,Peter_Dutton_said_that_if_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Peter Dutton says corporate Australia lacks ‘significant backbone’ for supporting an Indigenous voice to parliament

ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - JULY 2, 2023

1/2

Big business is digging in behind an Indigenous voice to parliament despite a scathing attack from Peter Dutton, who accused some of Australia’s largest companies of lacking a “significant backbone” for supporting the constitutional reform.

The Opposition Leader declared a constitutionally enshrined voice was not in the country’s or companies’ best interests after Rio Tinto, Wesfarmers and BHP each donated $2m to the Yes23 campaign.

The corporations declined to respond directly to Mr Dutton on Sunday but both BHP and Wesfarmers pointed The Australian to previous statements of support for the voice, while Ben Wyatt, Australia’s first Aboriginal treasurer and a Rio Tinto board member, said miners were in a strong position to make an informed choice about the independent advisory body ahead of the referendum.

“It’s striking to note that the corporates that have the most direct day-to-day engagement with Aboriginal Australia have taken a position in support of the Yes vote,” Mr Wyatt said.

“All my life corporate Australia has engaged in policy advocacy, whether it be Native Title, industrial relations, taxation reform or equal opportunity. What makes the current debate about the voice slightly different is that a large part of corporate Australia has recognised that the status quo in Aboriginal affairs is not sustainable.

“The choice is simple — does Australia commit to the world views of Dutton, (Pauline) Hanson, (Lidia) Thorpe that rejects reconciliation and lives with consequences; legal and community tension and increasingly marginalised indigenous population? Or does it embrace a pathway for an inclusive and reconciled future?”

Mr Dutton, the leading No campaigner, said many people in corporate Australia were craving popularity and trying to appease those in the Twittersphere by supporting the voice, including through major donations.

“There are many corporates at the moment, frankly, who lack a significant backbone,” he told Sky News’s Sunday Agenda program.

“There are debates that corporate Australia should be involved in and at the moment I don‘t think they’re paying due consideration to the views of their workforce, to the views of the community.

“There are a lot of CEOs and chairs who have very different conversations with you in private than what they say publicly because they‘re worried about ESG (environmental, social and governance) and remuneration packages being voted down at AGMs. It’s time they started to stand up for what’s in our country’s best interests.

“Clearly, the way that the Prime Minister has proposed the voice and conducted himself in his campaign, the voice is not in our country‘s best interests. And on that basis, I hope that people can support us in other tangible ways of finding better outcomes for Indigenous Australians, which is what we all desire.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19114957

File: 6600904eaf83fbd⋯.jpg (140.99 KB,1200x800,3:2,Australian_Opposition_Lead….jpg)

>>19114955

2/2

Mr Dutton also hit out at Rio Tinto for the “significant damage” it had done to Indigenous culture after destroying rock shelters of exceptional significance at Juukan Gorge.

He claimed that if the voice disagreed with Indigenous elders Rio Tinto had formed good relationships with, the voice would override them.

“How can that be in Rio Tinto’s or that local community’s best interests? A lot of business leaders in our country today need to reassess where they are on some of these debates,” he said.

Rio Tinto declined to respond, while BHP reiterated its longstanding support for the voice by providing The Australian with previous comments made by its Australian president Geraldine Slattery.

“This (support for the voice) is aligned with our support for broader efforts towards reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians,” she said.

Wesfarmers last week said its board and senior management had endorsed a decision to donate $2m to the Yes campaign but the company wasn’t telling team members how to vote.

“In the lead up to the referendum, we’re giving team members the opportunity to learn more about why we’re having a referendum and what is proposed,” Naomi Flutter, who leads Wesfarmers’ reconciliation work, said last week.

“Our focus is to promote informed and respectful discussions, where we know there will be different views, and won’t be telling our team members how to vote because this is a personal decision for every Australian.”

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney also refused to respond to Mr Dutton on Sunday, saying the referendum was not about herself, Anthony Albanese or the Opposition Leader.

She hinted at the referendum being held in October, saying she hoped there’d be “great excitement” about the poll during the AFL and NRL grand finals in late September and early October.

“Of course, there will be a prepoll and that will start two weeks before the referendum, three weeks in the remote areas,” Ms Burney said.

“The invitation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart … wasn’t to politicians, it wasn’t to individuals, it was to the Australian people and the outcome of this referendum, I am sure you will see the Australian people come together and rise to the occasion. I have every faith in them.”

The government has proposed a voice enshrined in the Constitution that would have no veto power over executive government and parliament but be able to provide advice on matters that affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/peter-dutton-says-corporate-australia-lacks-significant-backbone-for-supporting-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/b1abff85151d4aeb879ade9713fa0f2f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19114964

File: 806c25bf28eb7bc⋯.jpg (105.14 KB,1024x682,512:341,Coalition_frontbencher_Jac….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Coalition open to working with Pauline Hanson on No pamphlet

Lisa Visentin - July 3, 2023

1/2

Coalition frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has left open the door to working with One Nation leader Pauline Hanson on the written No case to be published in the official Voice referendum pamphlet, after they met in Parliament House last month to discuss Hanson’s potential contribution.

Hanson wants the No pamphlet to include the claim that the Voice will override the supremacy of parliament, which has been widely rejected by constitutional law experts, as well as unfounded assertions that it could pave the way for a separate Indigenous state and “racially exclusive” seats in parliament.

She has outlined her case against the Voice in a 2138-word essay, which she says she handed to Queensland Liberal National senator Paul Scarr, who also attended the meeting in Price’s parliamentary office, during the final sitting week in June before parliament rose for the winter recess.

Price is chairing the Coalition committee that will formulate the No camp’s written case while Scarr is deputy chair. Their document will form the opposing half of the official Yes/No referendum pamphlet that the Australian Electoral Commission is required to distribute to every Australian household at least 14 days before the vote. There is no legal requirement for the pamphlet to be truthful or accurate.

Price declined to respond directly to questions about whether Hanson’s controversial views would be accommodated, but said the committee was “open to listening to all respectful contributions” from MPs who opposed the Voice.

“No single person will be responsible for writing the No case pamphlet,” Price said in a statement.

“I acknowledge that there are a number of reasons to oppose Labor’s Voice and that many people, for many reasons, will want to contribute to the case against it. The committee will take these into consideration and ultimately produce a document that we believe outlines the strongest cases against it.”

The Coalition has the numbers to control the content of the No case’s half of the pamphlet, while the Yes case is being steered by Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney, who has agreed to consult crossbench and Liberal MPs who support the Voice.

Under the referendum rules, the Yes and No camps are given 2000 words each to make their case, with politicians who vote for/against the referendum bill in the parliament allowed to have input into the respective sides, although the final version is signed off by the majority. The written cases must be provided to the AEC by July 17.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19114966

File: 1a4ff1fc23949aa⋯.jpg (115.06 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Senator_Pauline_Hanson_rej….jpg)

>>19114964

2/2

Hanson’s essay includes a mix of mainstream arguments against the Voice similar to those made by the Coalition – for example, that it is legally risky, that Labor has failed to explain how it will close the Indigenous disadvantage, and that it will divide Australians along racial lines – as well as more extreme claims, including that the Voice could be a frontrunner for the creation of a new Indigenous state.

“In addition to an Indigenous state, the Voice could also be used as a vehicle for the establishment of racially exclusive seats in parliament held only by Indigenous people, similar to New Zealand’s parliament,” the essay claims.

It also claims “a Voice would override the supremacy of the elected Parliament and undermine the authority of the elected Australian government”, triggering litigation that would lead to “multiple constitutional crises”.

While the Coalition has opened the door to Hanson, a spokesperson for independent Victorian senator Lidia Thorpe said her office had not received any response from Price’s office following their attempts to discuss Thorpe’s involvement in the No case. Thorpe, who opposes the Voice on the basis it will be powerless and compromise Indigenous sovereignty, has already made clear she wants her “progressive No” arguments included in the No case.

Hanson told this masthead she had a separate conversation with Scarr in which he asked her views on whether Thorpe should be involved in the No pamphlet.

“I said [to Scarr] she does not respect our institution, does not like the parliament, she is not here for the right reasons and I don’t believe she should have an opportunity to have a say,” Hanson said. She claimed Scarr agreed with her view.

Scarr declined to comment on Hanson’s claims, saying it was not appropriate to discuss private conversations, but said he and Price would approach the pamphlet negotiations in the “same respectful way in which the broader debate over the constitutional change should be conducted”.

Hanson rejected suggestions some of her arguments amounted to misinformation and said she was “furious” that Nationals leader David Littleproud had indicated she could be sidelined from the pamphlet process.

“They’ve got the numbers, that’s why they want to sideline me. If they want to use part of it, great, because I think there are arguments in my document that they should put in it,” Hanson said.

Asked last week about concerns the pamphlet could fuel misinformation, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese urged Australians to be aware of the advice from constitutional law experts that it may not be accurate or truthful.

Price accused Albanese of not distinguishing between misinformation and information he did not like.

“For example, Minister Burney claiming the Voice won’t speak to Australia Day issues is misinformation, while legal experts saying the Voice could speak on Australia Day issues is information he probably doesn’t like,” she said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/coalition-open-to-working-with-pauline-hanson-on-no-pamphlet-20230630-p5dkoj.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19114971

File: 25b08fbfbd73449⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,1920x1279,1920:1279,A_former_mining_village_Da….jpg)

File: 4a4f295643a92af⋯.jpg (70.87 KB,1000x667,1000:667,Hundreds_of_US_Marines_who….jpg)

>>19104595

Defence, NT government strike deal to house Australian, international military personnel at Darwin's Howard Springs facility

Alicia Perera and Matt Garrick - 3 July 2023

The Northern Territory facility that gained national prominence as the "gold standard" for quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic will house thousands of troops from both Australia and overseas under a new lease agreement struck by the federal and NT governments.

Under the deal, which is effective immediately, the 3,500 bed Howard Springs centre on the outskirts of Darwin will be converted to a defence accommodation precinct for housing Australian and international defence personnel.

Initially for a five-year term, but with two five-year options to renew, the lease will cost the Commonwealth about $50 million a year, including $18 million in payments to the NT government.

Assistant Defence Minister Matt Thistlethwaite said the precinct would ease growing accommodation pressures on both defence bases and hotels in Darwin, with troops visiting the city during peak tourist season often having to stay at already busy hotels.

"The beauty of this facility is it gives us an ongoing solution to accommodation problems," he said.

"These rotations and exercises tend to take place in the peak tourist season, here in Darwin.

"The importance of this facility is it will take pressure off the local accommodation market during a crucial time for the NT tourism season, and that will ensure that there's more beds for tourists to come to."

He also acknowledged the agreement was part of federal government plans to increase military presence and spending in northern Australia.

"It's not only the US — we've also been growing the collaborations that we have with other nations as well … [and] we're only going to see more and more of that into the future," he said.

"It's also important to point out that we're going to see more Australian troops working in this area.

"We've got big plans to grow the Australian Defence Force, and the operations that occur here in the north of Australia, are an important component of that."

NT Chief Minister Natasha Fyles said the agreement came after a "range of conversations" about the Howard Springs facility's future since its closure as a COVID-19 quarantine centre last year.

"We think the fit with defence is a really good fit, particularly with a number of defence exercises taking palace during peak tourist season and also with our bases quite full during that time," she said.

Defence personnel will start moving into the facility from Monday night, with the first large cohort of troops — a 1,300-strong contingent from Australia and international partner nations participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre - due to arrive later this month.

The lease announcement comes after the Defence Department confirmed in December it was in negotiations with the NT government about leasing the Howard Springs facility.

Howard Springs village's storied history

The Howard Springs centre started life as a mining village for Japanese gas giant Inpex during the construction phase of the company's Darwin gas processing facility in the mid-2010s.

Following the end of Inpex's construction, the centre was handed back to the NT government, and it sat dormant for many months prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the COVID-19 years, the Howard Springs village was transformed into a quarantine centre for Australian residents returning from abroad, and for territory residents heading home from interstate.

Between 2020 and 2022 it held more than 60,000 people, including Australian residents returning from China's COVID-19 epicentre of Wuhan, athletes heading back from the Tokyo Olympics and long-term foreign ex-pats coming home.

More recently, the village was used to house around 700 flood evacuees from the territory outback, after three remote communities were inundated when the Victoria River broke its banks in March 2023.

During this period, the centre sustained at least $300,000 in damages, after a group of the evacuees smashed around 673 windows and vandalised fire extinguishers.

The government had previously flagged there could be criminal charges over some of the damage, but it remains unclear if any of the money spent will ever be recouped.

Final repairs are expected to be completed in about four weeks, Infrastructure Minister Eva Lawler said on Monday.

Ms Fyles noted the new lease agreement would still allow people evacuated from their homes due to natural disasters to be housed at the centre.

"We have ensured, in the negotiations, if there was a need for the Northern Territory … such as a pandemic or a natural disaster and this was decided to be best-used for Territorians, we can step that up," she said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-03/nt-howard-springs-centre-defence-lease-us-marines-accomodation/102554112

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19114980

File: 78f6263a436d9f5⋯.jpg (725.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Telstra_will_be_the_first_….jpg)

File: bf8f8d3beedbc55⋯.jpg (236.6 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Elon_Musk_s_satellite_prov….jpg)

Telstra partners with Elon Musk’s Starlink

DAVID SWAN - JULY 3, 2023

Telstra has signed an agreement to become the first telco globally to offer rural broadband and voice services with Elon Musk’s satellite provider Starlink.

Expected to launch in late 2023 with pricing to be confirmed, Telstra chief executive Vicki Brady said the offering would provide additional connectivity options for people and businesses where distance and terrain made it difficult to reach with existing networks.

Currently, customers wanting Starlink services need to deal with the company directly. Starlink is thought to have around 100,000 Australian customers, and 1.5 million customers globally.

“Telstra is always looking to invest in new and better connectivity options for our customers. We know that collaborating with the right partners is one of the best ways to help unlock a digital future, in this case for people in rural and remote Australia looking for an improved voice or broadband service,” Ms Brady said on Monday.

“Our teams have been out across the country testing and trialling Low Earth Orbit satellite technology to ensure we understand where it’s the best solution for our consumer and business customers.

“What will set our offer apart is the addition of Telstra voice service, a professional install option and the ability to get local help with your set-up if needed.

“In addition, this agreement will also provide connectivity options for our business customers in Australia and overseas, as a higher bandwidth business grade option in areas without fixed and mobile connectivity.”

Starlink, a low earth orbit satellite system owned by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, was launched in Australia in 2021 and offers unlimited data for $139 per month along with a hardware fee of about $900. Its speeds are similar to that of NBN’s 100Mbps plans.

Statistics in February previously reported by The Australian showed some 10,000 users ditched NBN’s satellite products over the last 12 months, switching to rival options including Starlink.

NBN critics have questioned whether NBN Co’s Sky Muster service could essentially be made obsolete by other options like Starlink, which have proved attractive to some rural customers who were previously experiencing poor speeds and struggling with strong internet coverage.

Angus Kidman, utilities analyst at comparison group Finder, pointed to research showing that 45 per cent of Australians in regional areas said their internet had lagged or stopped working at least once this year while working from home.

“It’s still early days but Telstra’s pricing information will be key to deciding just how good its satellite internet plan will be,” Mr Kidman said.

“What’s interesting is that you have to buy a voice service, which isn’t something Starlink itself offers – and also gives Telstra a reason to charge more than normal Starlink.

“Telstra positions itself as a premium service, so I’d expect the costs to be higher than DIY installations which is what Starlink currently offers.

“Anecdotally, most folks in highly remote areas wouldn’t be fazed by putting a dish on their roof by themselves, but the service could have appeal for some users.”

Mr Kidman said that given Starlink has been promoting $199 installs recently, Telstra will need to make sure its deal seems competitive.

“Internet dropouts can be a huge pain, especially if you’re working from home. If you’re experiencing delays to your internet often, it’s worth looking into switching plans.”

Telstra shares last traded at $4.30.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/telstra-partners-with-elon-musks-starlink/news-story/7f066b498ba14340c8a3eff782af7b30

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19115008

File: 2e5c4f2c9e8a703⋯.jpg (1.33 MB,4000x2573,4000:2573,Australian_firm_sues_Twitt….jpg)

Australian firm sues Twitter for $665,000 for not paying bills

Renju Jose - July 3, 2023

SYDNEY, July 3 (Reuters) - An Australian project management firm has filed a lawsuit against Twitter Inc in a U.S. court seeking cumulative payments of about A$1 million ($665,000) over alleged non-payment of bills for work done in four countries, court filings showed.

Sydney-based private company Facilitate Corp on June 29 filed the suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District Of California claiming breach of contract over Twitter's failure to pay its invoices.

The Australian firm's lawsuit is the latest alleging non-payment of bills and rent against Twitter since Elon Musk bought the social media platform for $44 billion last year.

Facilitate said from 2022 through early 2023, it installed sensors in Twitter's offices in London and Dublin, completed an office fit-out in Singapore, and cleared an office in Sydney.

For those works, Twitter owed the company about 203,000 pounds, S$546,600 and A$61,300, respectively, Facilitate said.

Twitter, also known as X Corp, no longer has a media relations office. Reuters could not immediately reach Twitter's Australia office.

Facilitate said it was seeking compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial, legal costs and interest at the maximum legal rate.

In May, a former public relations firm filed a suit in a New York court saying Twitter had not paid its bills, while early this year U.S.-based advisory firm Innisfree M&A Inc sued it, seeking about $1.9 million for what it said were unpaid bills after it advised Twitter on its acquisition by Musk.

Britain's Crown Estate, an independent commercial business that manages the property portfolio belonging to the monarchy, in January began court proceedings over alleged unpaid rent on Twitter's London headquarters.

($1 = 1.5038 Australian dollars)

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/australian-firm-sues-twitter-665000-not-paying-bills-2023-07-03/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19120589

File: 2d5b806fac81cd4⋯.jpg (126.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ken_Wyatt_second_left_with….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Liberals ‘have lost contact with mainstream’ over Indigenous voice to parliament, says Ken Wyatt

PAUL GARVEY - JULY 3, 2023

The Coalition risks descending into political irrelevance unless it can find a way to reconnect with middle Australia, former federal Liberal MP Ken Wyatt has warned.

In his latest scathing broadside against the party he served for more than a decade, Wyatt – who was the first Indigenous Australian elected to the House of Representatives, the first to serve as a government minister, and the first appointed to cabinet – said it was hard to see a ­future for the Liberals and the ­Nationals if they did not change their stand on a range of issues.

“The party is going to have to consider its position in respect to the political landscape of the nation or face a period in which it’ll be ­irrelevant and its numbers will be small,” he told The Australian.

“The Coalition … is not reaching the future generations of this country. The things that concern them and are not being addressed, and one of the things that does concern them is fairness.”

After losing his seat of Hasluck at last year’s federal election, Mr Wyatt earlier this year quit his membership of the Liberal Party after Peter Dutton declared that the party would campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament that Mr Wyatt has long argued for.

He stood with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Canberra when the proposed wording of the referendum was announced, and last week he was confirmed as the new co-chair of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Council overseeing Western Australia’s new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act and ­offering advice to WA Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti.

Mr Wyatt said the federal opposition’s position on the voice was emblematic of the party’s disconnect with many mainstream voters, and compared the party’s stand on the voice to the opposition from some MPs – such as Mr Dutton – on the same-sex marriage plebiscite.

“Australians aren’t stupid. They know what they want addressed,” he said. “When we had the plebiscite, there were many of my colleagues who did not think the Australian people would support same-sex marriage. And then when the result came back, we saw the reaction of some individuals who didn’t even enter the chamber for the vote.”

Mr Wyatt’s commentary follows a report last week from the Centre for Independent Studies that found younger generations were not following older generations in shifting towards conservatives as they aged.

While Labor’s primary vote has also been eroded, that party could rely on preferences from the Greens. At the same time, the teal independents who won several lower house seats at the last election could potentially erode the Liberals’ upper house numbers.

“Somewhere we are missing the mark on reaching into the future generations of Australians and I think it’ll only be a matter of time before the teals start running candidates for the Senate,” Mr Wyatt said.

“And if that happens, I think the Coalition will have even greater challenges.”

Mr Wyatt said he had been particularly hurt by the opposition to the voice from former WA-based colleagues Michaelia Cash and Linda Reynolds.

“I used to sit with them on the VIP flight coming back from Canberra to Perth,” he said. “Neither ever asked about the voice. They could have had a four-hour discussion with me just on one flight about the voice, and they never did.”

He slammed what he described as Senator Cash’s “outlandish” commentary about the voice and the former attorney-general’s ­argument that she did not want to see a race-based provision introduced to the Constitution.

The document, he says, already includes multiple race-based provisions. “It’s alarming to have a former first law officer of the nation not understanding the Constitution,” Mr Wyatt said.

He was also critical of two of the most prominent no campaigners, Warren Mundine and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. Neither of them, he said, had been able to deliver meaningful solutions for Indigenous people despite having been in positions of influence in the past.

Mr Mundine, he noted, had the ears of prime ministers Tony ­Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull while serving as the chairman of the Indigenous Advisory Council while Senator Price was the deputy mayor of Alice Springs before ­entering parliament.

“If [Mr Mundine] had the solutions, then we should have seen change. Jacinta had a significant role in local government in a town that has got so many sorry elements to it, and yet I didn’t see proactive action from her in local government that turned around and addressed the needs of the town camps or the Indigenous ­people living in that area,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/liberals-have-lost-contact-with-mainstream-over-indigenous-voice/news-story/b55bcbc2bae921a0b0e51c93ecf1ab3b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19120607

File: 48dc91d4a3e007f⋯.jpg (154.48 KB,1535x864,1535:864,Ted_Hui_left_and_Kevin_Yam….jpg)

Hong Kong cops put bounty on two high-profile Australian residents

WILL GLASGOW - JULY 4, 2023

Hong Kong police have put a $HK1m ($191,800) bounty on Melbourne-based Australian lawyer Kevin Yam and Ted Hui, a former Hong Kong politician who now lives in Adelaide, in an unprecedented application of the Beijing-authored National Security Law.

Announcing the bounties late on Monday, Chief Superintendent Steven Li said Hong Kong’s police force “won’t stop chasing them”, setting up a confrontation with an Australian government already straining to maintain the recent “stabilisation” of relations with China.

“We are absolutely not staging any show or spreading fear. We are enforcing law,” said Superintendent Li at a press conference in Hong Kong.

The Hong Kong police force announced that eight people, ­including the Australian pair, were being accused of breaking the sweeping security law. The accused span democracy activists, former MPs and civic leaders, who live variously in Canada, the US, Britain and Australia.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who met Mr Hui and Mr Yam in her government offices in Adelaide in January, said the Australian government was “deeply disappointed” by the news of the arrest warrants.

“We have consistently expressed concerns about the broad application of the National Security Law to arrest or pressure pro-democracy figures and civil society,” Senator Wong told The Australian late on Monday.

“The [Albanese] government will continue to speak out on issues that matter to Australians, including human rights.

“Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy, and we will support those in Australia who exercise those rights.

“Australia remains deeply concerned by the continuing erosion of Hong Kong’s rights, freedoms and autonomy,” she said.

Last November, Mr Hui and Mr Yam went to Canberra to meet with Australian federal politicians to discuss pressing issues for the Hong Kong Australian diaspora.

Speaking from Adelaide, Mr Hui told The Australian the charges and bounty were “ridiculous and hilarious”, and showed how “powerless” China’s ruling party is.

“It doesn’t affect my personal safety at all. I already have a number of arrest warrants against me under the National Security Law and (other laws),” said Mr Hui, a former Hong Kong pro-democracy MP who sought political asylum in Australia in 2021 and is applying for permanent residency.

“The CCP regime has no way of persuading Western democracies to extradite me. For example, in Australia the extradition treaty has been suspended. So I feel very safe here,” he said, using the initials of the Chinese Communist Party.

“It’s making it very apparent to the world that China is progressing towards more extreme authoritarianism.”

Mr Yam is an Australian citizen, and cricket tragic, who was raised in Melbourne before working as a commercial lawyer in Hong Kong for two decades. He said the Hong Kong ­government was trying to underscore the “extraterritorial” threat of the security law.

Speaking to The Australian less than an hour after he was a­ccused of “collusion”, Mr Yam said his phone had been running “non-stop” with congratulations messages.

“It says a lot about how far Hong Kong has fallen that ­people think that having a ­national security arrest warrant is a badge of honour,” said Mr Yam, who returned to Melbourne in 2022 and is now a ­senior fellow at Georgetown University’s Centre for Asian Law.

“I derive no joy from all the congratulations. I just feel sad for Hong Kong,” he said.

The controversial law bans acts of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with ­foreign forces, and was imposed under instructions from Beijing after months of protests in 2019.

Senator Wong last week ­repeated Australia’s deep concerns about its application in a city with the second-biggest group of overseas Australians.

The other six suspects announced on Monday are former MPs Nathan Law Kwun-chung and Dennis Kwok Wing-hang, unionist Mung Siu-tat, and activists Finn Lau Cho-dik, Anna Kwok Fung-yee and Elmer Yuan Gong-yi.

During a speech on the 26th anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to Chinese rule on July 1, Hong Kong chief executive John Lee Ka-chiu warned the city should remain on guard against “soft resistance” that posed a threat to national security.

Hong Kong’s police force said it has arrested 260 people, aged from 15 to 90, since the law took effect.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hong-kong-cops-put-bounty-on-two-highprofile-australian-residents/news-story/fb3f26a142ed12ea85cf755276b52eb7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19120614

File: 7aeddb3b8070365⋯.jpg (125.12 KB,1023x682,3:2,Hong_Kong_pro_democracy_ac….jpg)

File: d908c5ccb1ebaea⋯.jpg (163.17 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Exiled_Hong_Kong_lawmaker_….jpg)

>>19120607

‘Hilarious’: Hong Kong activists in Australia slam China’s arrest threat

Eryk Bagshaw and Latika Bourke - July 4, 2023

1/2

Hong Kong activists living in Australia who have had a bounty put on them by the Chinese government have dismissed the threat as a stunt, arguing it reveals how powerless Beijing has become against dissent overseas.

The $HK1 million bounties ($192,000) were offered by Hong Kong police chief superintendent Steve Li on Monday night for information leading to the arrests of Melbourne lawyer Kevin Yam, who is an Australian citizen, and former Hong Kong legislator Ted Hui, who has settled in Adelaide with his family.

Hui, a pro-democracy leader, has had multiple warrants issued for his arrest since he left Hong Kong in 2020 after his family’s accounts were locked by HSBC, Hang Seng Bank and Bank of China. Hui, who led protests against Beijing’s growing influence over Hong Kong in 2019, said he did not fear for his or his family’s safety in Australia.

“The bounty does not change my situation or affect my personal safety at all,” he said.

“I think the bounty is ridiculous and hilarious. It can only be a high-profile gesture without any legal effects. Free countries will not extradite us because of that. It only shows how powerless the Chinese Communist Party is in response to the Hong Kong diaspora who advocates for freedom and democracy.”

But Hong Kong lawyer Eric Yan-ho Lai said the bounties were “direct sponsorship of transnational repression” that provided incentives to “create surveillance and intimidation against communities and financial institutions of the host countries” such as Australia.

The national security laws imposed by Beijing in 2020 to put an end to pro-democracy protests that had rocked the city are extraterritorial, which means they apply to any activity around the world that could be interpreted as dissent.

Australian intelligence services have become increasingly concerned by the threat of intimidation from foreign powers. In a rare public intervention in August 2020, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation said it was aware of threats to numerous individuals due to their voicing of opinions on political and ideological issues.

“In some cases, foreign governments will seek to use members of the diaspora community in Australia to monitor, direct and influence the activities of the same diaspora communities,” ASIO said.

The US State Department on Tuesday morning condemned Hong Kong’s police force for using the laws to issue extraterritorial warrants.

“The extraterritorial application of the Beijing-imposed national security law is a dangerous precedent that threatens the human rights and fundamental freedoms of people all over the world,” state department spokesman Matthew Miller said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19120616

File: f3737d0f2b7d201⋯.jpg (137.36 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Ted_Hui_left_and_Kevin_Yam….jpg)

>>19120614

2/2

Yam, a Melbourne-based senior fellow at Georgetown University’s Centre for Asian Law, has been highly critical of the impact of the national security law and its impact on the independence of Hong Kong’s judiciary. The Hong Kong-born lawyer said he had been targeted for arrest for colluding with foreign forces.

“I am an Australian citizen exercising my free speech right in Australia,” he said.

“They are running out of big targets in Hong Kong, so they are trying to create pantomime villains out of us.”

Yam said he believed the bounties had a domestic and international audience.

“The domestic message is if you’re in Hong Kong and you share these people’s Facebook or Twitter posts, you could get into trouble as well.

“And then on the international side, I think they are trying to intimidate people overseas about ever speaking out about Hong Kong.

“They’re also sending a signal to Western nations that basically, we don’t give a shit about your freedom.”

Others named by Hong Kong police are based in the UK and the US. They include exiled politicians Nathan Law and Dennis Kwok; activists Finn Lau, Anna Kwok and Elmer Yuan; and unionist Mung Siu-tat.

“The eight persons concerned who have fled overseas are alleged to have continued to commit offences under the national security law,” a Hong Kong government spokesperson said in a statement on Monday.

“The fugitives should not have any delusion that they could evade their legal liabilities by absconding from Hong Kong.”

In a further escalation on Tuesday, China’s embassy accused the United Kingdom of harbouring fugitives.

“British politicians have openly offered protection for fugitives. This is crude interference in Hong Kong’s rule of law and China’s internal affairs,” the embassy said.

The Chinese embassy in Canberra has been contacted for comment.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said she was deeply disappointed by the issue of the arrest warrants.

“We have consistently expressed concerns about the broad application of the national security law to arrest or pressure pro-democracy figures and civil society,” Wong said.

“Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy, and we will support those in Australia who exercise those rights. Australia remains deeply concerned by the continuing erosion of Hong Kong’s rights, freedoms and autonomy.”

Hui, who had to return to work in Adelaide on Tuesday after the bounty was issued, said the warrants showed the Chinese government had become more oppressive at home and abroad.

“It even makes it clear to the Western democracies that China is [becoming] more authoritarian and more of a threat to the world,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/hilarious-hong-kong-activists-in-australia-slam-china-s-arrest-threat-20230704-p5dlks.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19120629

File: 7c81d1138708311⋯.jpg (2.56 MB,4165x2776,4165:2776,Indonesian_President_Joko_….jpg)

File: 8eb5150f2eb5a88⋯.jpg (1.92 MB,3634x2423,3634:2423,Joko_Widodo_arrived_at_Syd….jpg)

File: ca9e66dc65fb92f⋯.jpg (6.03 MB,4939x3293,4939:3293,Joko_Widodo_is_nearing_the….jpg)

Visa extension, climate finance agreements as Indonesian President Joko Widodo visits Sydney

Gavin Coote - 4 July 2023

Australia will ease some visa rules for Indonesians visiting the country, as part of a series of agreements struck during President Joko Widodo's visit to Sydney.

The head of state met with business and political leaders today, in what is expected to be his last visit as president as he nears the end of a second and final term in office.

Following bilateral talks, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced Indonesians will have immediate access to an extended visa from three to five years.

Indonesia has been advocating for easier access to Australian visas, arguing the current process is onerous and costly.

Mr Albanese said Indonesian citizens would also get access to the Frequent Traveller Scheme visa.

"This offers a 10-year visa validity, making an enormous difference in removing impediments to our closer relationship," Mr Albanese said.

The Australian government has also announced $50 million to attract private climate finance to Indonesia under the Climate and Infrastructure Partnership between the two countries.

Discussions also featured a strong focus on bolstering education and cultural links and will see a revamped program teaching Indonesian language and culture in Australian schools.

Former Australian ambassador to Indonesia John McCarthy said it marked a shift in emphasis to boosting mutual understanding and trade between neighbours.

"The visa issue, for example, is really quite important for the Indonesians. It has been very hard to get in Australia for most Indonesians," Mr McCarthy told the ABC.

"That's being eased up, that's very positive. The importance of business, we are way behind what we should be, both countries, in terms of trade and mutual investment, that too is being emphasised, so I think we're probably on the right track, both of them."

The Indonesian leader, widely known as Jokowi, remains highly popular with approval ratings above 70 per cent in his homeland.

Griffith University's Business School Pro Vice-Chancellor, Caitlin Byrne, said the president's trip near the end of his tenure was an "important statement".

"There's no surprise in the fact that Joko Widodo is very internally-focused, Indonesia is an archipelagic nation, national unity is one of his core priorities and he would have to travel quite a bit across the nation," she said.

"But certainly for the bilateral relationship, this visit matters and it's important as he nears the end of his term.

"Widodo has made it very clear that he would like to talk about some very concrete projects and would like to see concrete actions come out of this, particularly in the economic space."

Indonesia has ambitions to become a global hub for battery and electric vehicle manufacturing, and it is expected today's talks in Sydney will focus on how Australia could help supply minerals to its neighbour.

Both nations have large reserves of nickel and other important minerals for electric vehicle batteries, but Indonesia lacks lithium.

"There's a fair bit of reciprocity in here, Australia as one of the largest producers of lithium, for example, we'll have an opportunity potentially to supply lithium to Indonesia and potentially also do some minerals processing before that goes offshore," Professor Byrne said.

"But of course, as well, Australians might be very keen to import electric vehicles from our neighbour.

"At the moment, there's a very long waiting list and it takes a long time to get an electric vehicle out here, so that could be a solution for Australia that we've been looking for."

Lingering concern about AUKUS

While the leaders regard each other as friends, the issue of defence and security remains somewhat of a sticking point between the two nations.

Indonesia and Australian officials have been negotiating a new defence cooperation agreement that could pave the way for joint military exercises.

But Australian National University emeritus professor Greg Fealy said Indonesia and its neighbours remained uneasy about Australia's AUKUS defence pact with the US and the UK.

"Many of the South-East Asian, but not all of the South-East Asian nations, feel that this entrenches and perhaps exacerbates the rivalry between the two superpowers, China and the United States, and they see Australia as more firmly in the US corner as a result of AUKUS," Emeritus Professor Fealy told the ABC.

Professor Byrne said while the two countries approach security with "very different perspectives", she believed there was the potential for some positive steps that could bolster security in the Indo-Pacific.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-04/joko-widodo-visits-australia-for-anthony-albanese-meetings/102555778

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19120643

File: eb929114c1c3c25⋯.jpg (123.33 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_outside_t….jpg)

File: 6af48464894999f⋯.jpg (129.82 KB,720x1280,9:16,Brittany_Higgins_Instagram….jpg)

File: c8c00edb261517e⋯.jpg (78.34 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_being_sig….jpg)

File: 8d7ec9c1f768d73⋯.jpg (72.49 KB,768x768,1:1,Brittany_Higgins_second_fr….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

‘Time to stop’: Brittany Higgins lashes out against Linda Reynolds

STEPHEN RICE and REMY VARGA - 12:17PM JULY 4, 2023

Brittany Higgins has lashed out at her former boss, Linda Reynolds, after the Liberal MP said she would ask the National Anti-Corruption Commission to investigate the circumstances surrounding the commonwealth payment to her former staffer.

On Tuesday Ms Higgins posted on social media a series of newspaper headlines that she claimed originate “from a current Australian Senator who continues to harass me through the media and in the Parliament …. This has been going on for years now. It is time to stop.”

Senator Reynolds has indicated she will refer Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to the NACC over the payment of more than $2.5 million in compensation to her former staffer following Ms Higgins’ claims her allegations of rape were mishandled.

“The basis for the settlement and the reasons why the Attorney-General barred me and Senator (Michaelia) Cash from defending serious allegations against us have not been explained to us or to the Australian people,” Senator Reynolds said.

“I believe that the Attorney-General must not only be impartial, but must also be seen to be impartial, which requires transparency.”

Ms Higgins’ posted newspaper headlines referring to Senator Reynolds’ statement, including one reading: “ ‘Punitive’: Reynolds accuses Attorney-General of prejudice over Lehrmann inquiry”.

Ms Higgins then commented: “My boss who has publicly apologised for mishandling my rape allegation. Who has had to publicly apologise after defaming me in the workplace. Who had a whole bunch of questionable conduct during my rape trial. Who is suing my fiancé for a tweet.”

Ms Higgins claimed up to 40 years’ worth of economic loss and the end of her pursuit of a future political career were among the reasons she was due more than $2.5m in compensation from the government after allegedly being raped, a draft statement of claim revealed last month.

Mr Dreyfus has consistently refused to answer questions over Ms Higgins’ multi-million-dollar payout, which was provided without the consultation of former senior Liberal ministers at the centre of her claims.

Last year The Australian revealed the Albanese government muzzled Senator Reynolds in her defence against the multi-million-dollar lawsuit, threatening to tear up an agreement to pay her legal fees and any costs awarded unless she agreed not to attend mediation.

Senator Reynolds was determined to defend herself against Ms Higgins’ allegations but in correspondence obtained by The Australian, the commonwealth’s lawyers told her she could not take part in the mediation.

She was therefore unable to dispute any of Ms Higgins’ allegations about a failure to support her or properly investigate the incident, some of which were contested by both Senator Reynolds and her then chief of staff Fiona Brown at Mr Lehrmann’s trial.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/time-to-stop-brittany-higgins-lashes-out-against-linda-reynolds/news-story/cf81e81af03329e6075fe341b63128ad

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19120663

File: 03a095450abe8a5⋯.mp4 (8.68 MB,640x360,16:9,358027256_986340839233524_….mp4)

>>18946058

>>19104595

Talisman Sabre Facebook Post

4 July 2023

Talisman Sabre 2023

We are counting down the days to the start of #TalismanSabre2023! #TS23 is the largest bilateral military training exercise between Australia and the United States.

This year, 12 other nations will take part in the exercise which will take place across the top end of Australia.

Stay tuned for more announcements as the countdown begins!

https://www.facebook.com/talismansabre/videos/talisman-sabre-2023/1016879059725474/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126371

File: bef5f3bb123e3ae⋯.jpg (135.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Indigenous voice to parliament: Linda Burney defines policy remit under her watch

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 5, 2023

1/2

Linda Burney has revealed health, education, jobs and housing as the four policy priorities on which she will ask the Indigenous voice to provide advice, as she is forced to define its remit and silence criticism from the No camp.

In a full-throated defence of the advisory body, the Indigenous Australians Minister will use a major address in Canberra on Wednesday to outline more of her vision for the voice to parliament and the executive government, which is facing falling support in the polls as opponents home in on the lack of detail about it and warn it will divide Australia.

Ms Burney will tell the National Press Club the voice will be active and engaged under her watch and offer new perspectives to old challenges from Indigenous Australians.

“From day one, the voice will have a full in-tray,” she will say, according to an advance copy of her speech. “I will ask the voice to consider four main priority areas: health, education, jobs and housing. The voice will be tasked with taking the long-view.

“Unlike government, it won’t be distracted by the three-year election cycles. It will plan for the next generation, not the next term. It will be focused on making a better future for the next generation. The time to make a generational difference is now.”

While Ms Burney faced sustained Coalition questioning in the final sitting fortnight before the winter break over what the voice would be able to advise on, including abolishing Australia Day, the minister will on Wednesday say its remit will include improving school attendance rates and fixing an employment and training program in remote communities.

She will attempt to answer three questions in her speech – why is the voice needed, how will the voice work and why does it need to be enshrined in the Constitution – amid pressure from Peter Dutton to pursue constitutional recognition first and then legislate local and regional advisory bodies.

But Ms Burney will offer little new detail on the voice’s machinations, with questions remaining over the role local and regional voices will play or whether members would be elected or appointed.

“It’s not going to be a passive advisory body. I want it to be active and engaged,” she will say.

“We want the voice to come up with fresh ideas – fresh ideas than can guide us over the long-term. As the minister, when I meet with the voice for the first time I will say: ‘Bring me your ideas on how to stop our people from taking their own lives’.

“‘Bring me your ideas on how to help our kids go to school and thrive. Bring me your ideas on how we make sure our mob live strong and healthy lives. How we ensure more people have jobs – with the independence and purpose that brings. How we strengthen culture and language. How we support families better. How we keep alive our 65,000 years of culture and make it stronger’.

“I will be asking the voice for their input to solve these most pressing issues’.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126372

File: f20009265fba3cd⋯.jpg (209.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ms_Burney_at_the_Yes23_Cam….jpg)

>>19126371

2/2

It will be up to politicians to legislate the voice if the referendum, expected in mid-October, succeeds. The government’s constitutional amendment states parliament shall make laws with respect to its composition, functions, powers and procedures.

Ms Burney will warn against a legislated voice that is not in the Constitution, saying it will simply be abolished by future governments. “Why does the voice need to be in the Constitution? Why can’t it just be legislated?” Ms Burney will say.

“There are two main reasons. One: a voice or representative body cannot be truly independent or give frank advice if the government of the day can abolish it with a stroke of the pen. Two: it’s what First Nations people requested in the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

“The starting point for reconciliation has to be listening to the wishes of Indigenous people. The starting point cannot be a political fix made in Canberra. That’s not real reconciliation.”

Making the speech during NAIDOC week, Ms Burney will tell the Press Club audience that young Aboriginal people in particular need a voice. With just four out of 19 closing the gap targets on track, she will insist: “I honestly believe the voice can help. We have everything to gain and nothing to lose by supporting the voice. Because the voice will be a mechanism for government and parliament to listen. It will be like a resource of local knowledge and solutions that can help us make better policies.

“The voice will be nimble, efficient, and focused on making a practical difference.”

Manager of Opposition Business Paul Fletcher said on Tuesday the Coalition had asked Ms Burney 20 questions about the voice in the past two sitting weeks but she had “repeatedly failed to provide detailed information in her answers”.

According to the government’s constitutional amendment, the voice may make representations to the parliament and executive government “on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-linda-burney-defines-policy-remit-under-her-watch/news-story/bd2a0b4f3ea4c704fabc5bcb3739489a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126382

File: 0a367332eab194d⋯.jpg (118.38 KB,1280x720,16:9,Linda_Burney_addresses_the….jpg)

File: fde4ad25bd62b74⋯.jpg (206.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_crowd_at_Come_Together….jpg)

File: 65ebe0ae4c2c00c⋯.jpg (138.68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Pat_Anderson_and_members_o….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19126371

‘The voice will be tasked with taking the long view’: Linda Burney

LINDA BURNEY - JULY 5, 2023

1/2

Much has been made of the proactive representations the voice will make to parliament and the government.

Bringing the priorities of local communities to Canberra will be incredibly important.

So will be the requests government makes of the voice. This will be a step-change in our ability to deliver evidence-based policy. Policy that is supported by community, and makes a practical difference.

From day one the voice will have a full in-tray. I will ask the voice to consider four main priority areas: health, education, jobs and housing.

The voice will be tasked with taking the long-view. Unlike government, it won’t be distracted by the 3 year election cycles. It will plan for the next generation, not the next term.

It will be focused on making a better future for the next generation. The time to make a generational difference is now.

We live in an ageing country. Overall, less than a third of Australians are under 25.

However, that rises to more than half for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. In the decades ahead, the cost and the consequences of repeating the same mistakes will be amplified.

So too will the benefits if we listen, and do things better. We want the voice to come up with fresh ideas. Fresh ideas than can guide us over the long-term.

As the Minister, when I meet with the voice for the first time I will say: Bring me your ideas on how to stop our people from taking their own lives. Bring me your ideas on how to help our kids go to school and thrive. Bring me your ideas on how we make sure our mob live strong and healthy lives; how we ensure more people have jobs with the independence and purpose that brings.

How we strengthen culture and language. How we support families better. How we keep alive our 65,000 years of culture and make it stronger.

I will be asking the voice for their input to solve these most pressing issues. So, there will be important work in the voice’s in-tray from day one.

It’s not going to be a passive advisory body. I want it to be active and engaged.

We need new perspectives to old challenges perspectives that are connected to communities.

We need ideas that come from the people on the ground. We need a voice.

As my trailblazing sister, June Oscar puts it: “An Indigenous body gives us an opportunity to … elevate our voices in a country where we occupy a space on the fringe of government policy. A voice gives us the ability to address parliament directly through our connections to our communities and regions.”

Friends, voting Yes at the referendum will be a vote to unify and strengthen Australia. Voting Yes will be an act of patriotism. An act of your belief in Australia.

We are the greatest country in the world. And we can be even greater if we recognise Indigenous Australians.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126383

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19126382

2/2

One of the best things about modern Australia – is that so many of us welcome those who come from across the sea to make a new life here.

I see it in my own multicultural community of Barton. We rightly take great pride in welcoming waves of migration over the decades.

And generation after generation of migrants have come to this country because they want a better life for themselves and their family. It is the great Australian story.

But not everyone has enjoyed those same opportunities. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have not enjoyed those same opportunities – the gap isn’t closing.

Disadvantage and discrimination persist. The good news is that later this year we will all get the chance to do something better.

Together, we can build a better future that recognises Indigenous Australians rightful place in this country. A better future that genuinely listens to the needs and aspirations of Indigenous Australians.

As the Prime Minister said at Garma last year: “In years to come, we will be able to measure the success of the voice not just by the number of people who vote for a voice … but by the lives that the voice helps to change. The communities it empowers, the opportunities it creates, the justice it delivers, the security it will bring to First Nations people around our country.”

Friends, history is calling us. And I hope more than anything that the answer is Yes. Yes to the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Yes to a voice to parliament. And Yes to a better future.

I want to conclude by quoting a passage from the Uluru Statement from the Heart:

“Proportionally, we are the most incarcerated people on the planet. We are not an innately criminal people. Our children are aliened from their families at unprecedented rates. This cannot be because we have no love for them. And our youth languish in detention in obscene numbers. They should be our hope for the future. These dimensions of our crisis tell plainly the structural nature of our problem. This is the torment of our powerlessness. We seek constitutional reforms to empower our people and take a rightful place in our own country. When we have power over our destiny our children will flourish. They will walk in two worlds and their culture will be a gift to their country.”

Friends, it’s time. Ngali Yarhagi barrranjrra, Manwunbul. Let’s get this done, together.

The Hon Linda Burney is Minister for Indigenous Australians. This is an excerpt of the speech she will deliver at the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-voice-will-be-tasked-with-taking-the-long-view-linda-burney/news-story/a66edcdad0416e8447013de4757de50a

IN FULL: Linda Burney outlines Voice priorities in National Press Club address

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0b4cQcLU9s

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126388

File: def06ba2ee54854⋯.jpg (61.24 KB,768x768,1:1,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19126371

Indigenous voice to parliament: Linda Burney in damage control over Yes campaign

SIMON BENSON - JULY 4, 2023

Linda Burney is now seeking to ameliorate the damage she and the government helped inflict on the Yes campaign for the voice in the final week of parliament before the winter break.

The damage from a failure to supply detail, and the subsequent dispute over the remit of the voice in its advice to executive government and parliament, has been acute. It has become the central problem for the government.

A new strategy was always going to be required for the government to halt the momentum of the No campaign.

In a speech to the National Press Club on Wednesday, the Indigenous Australians Minister will hope to reset the government’s narrative and provide a template for the Yes campaign to address community concerns.

The most notable shift is an attempt to put some firm guardrails around the voice and what its focus will, or at least should, be.

This was desperately needed weeks ago, if not months.

Burney now says that under her watch as minister, she will be directing the voice to advise her on better Indigenous policy outcomes across four priority areas: health, education, employment and housing.

This is the first time the government has articulated such an explicit set of policy areas it expects the functions of the voice to concentrate on.

They should have been obvious from the outset.

But it is the most clear Burney has been about it since being left stranded in parliament two weeks ago unable to answer questions from the opposition.

In trying to allay fears over what the voice will and won’t be able to advise on, following the absurd debate over issues such as parking tickets, Burney is now suggesting the government will be more strident in its expectations of what the voice will advise on.

This position risks injecting a new and contestable element into the debate with the claim that it will be the minister who directs the voice as to what it should be interested in.

While Indigenous leaders won’t disagree that the priorities Burney has identified are the ones the voice should be most concerned with, some may take exception to what might appear to be a question over its independence.

The danger for Burney is that by seeking to erect barriers around what the voice can advise on, a new front of contention is opened up with its architects.

While Burney’s speech could be seen as an admission that the Yes campaign strategy is failing, it is an important step in addressing the obvious weaknesses that have bedevilled the government up until now.

The question is whether it will be enough to start shifting the dial.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-linda-burney-in-damage-control-over-yes-campaign/news-story/126c42d766d646bec089f0cda204e45f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126399

File: 304c40d64c05ec6⋯.mp4 (15.94 MB,640x360,16:9,No_campaign_importing_Trum….mp4)

>>18928670

>>19126371

Linda Burney calls out ‘No’ campaign for running ‘Trump-style politics’, Jacinta Price hits back

Leading ‘no’ campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has accused Linda Burney of an ‘arrogant attack’ in a speech where she lambasted ‘Trumpian’ campaign tactics.

Ellen Ransley - July 5, 2023

1/2

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has accused Linda Burney of launching an “arrogant” and “elitist” attack, after the Indigenous Australians Minister said Voice opponents were using “Trump-style politics”.

Addressing the National Press Club on Wednesday during NAIDOC week, the Indigenous Australians Minister said Fair Australia, the main campaign group against the upcoming Voice to parliament referendum, was threatening to divide Australia.

She warned Australians not to fall for the divisive tactics of the “No” campaign, using her speech to plead for Australians to vote “Yes” when the vote is held sometime between October and December.

“Fair Australia … is imposing Trump-style politics to Australia. It is post-truth and its aim is to polarise, to sow division in our society by making false claims, including providing advice to government would somehow impact the fundamental democratic principle of one vote, one value,” she said.

“A claim designed to mislead. Do not let them divide us”.

Senator Price, a key proponent of the “No” vote and spokeswoman for Fair Australia, said Ms Burney had launched an “arrogant attack” on ordinary Australians voting no, proving the referendum was “about division”.

“If you stand against her campaign to change the Constitution to quite literally divide us by race, you’re accused of division, racism, and misinformation. How is that not divisive?” Senator Price said.

“The good news is that mainstream Australians are wise to the division the ‘Yes’ campaign is trying to enshrine in our national rule book.

“We will not be standing idly by while Ms Burney launches her elitist attacks from the comfort of the Press Club.”

Questioned on whether she would consider taking a more aggressive approach to misinformation and division sewing, Ms Burney said it was “up to Peter Dutton”.

“If you want to tell people what to do, stop,” she said, referring to Mr Dutton’s comments that some of the country’s biggest companies supporting a Voice are “craving popularity”.

Asked by journalists whether there was any other path to reconciliation if the Voice were to fail, Ms Burney said her focus was ensuring the vote succeeded.

“I have a very deep commitment and a very deep view that Australians will rise to this,” she said.

“I have every faith.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126405

File: 46998f92a9c0914⋯.jpg (88.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,Linda_Burney_addressed_the….jpg)

File: dbfa8b68786d6f9⋯.jpg (108.91 KB,1280x720,16:9,She_said_the_Voice_s_prior….jpg)

File: 9f717d4021b20cb⋯.jpg (83.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19126399

2/2

During her speech, Ms Burney sought to quiet claims made by opponents that the Voice could make representations on changing the date of Australia Day, or on the Reserve Bank’s cash rate decisions, or on parking tickets.

She said the Voice would have bigger priorities, given the aim of the body would be to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians once and for all.

She said the Voice is needed because the gap “isn’t closing fast enough”, and that once operational she said she would ask the Voice to consider four main priority areas: health, education, jobs, and housing.

“When I meet with the Voice for the first time I will say: ‘bring me your ideas on how to stop our people from taking their own lives. Bring me your ideas on how to help our kids go to school and thrive. Bring me your ideas on how we make sure our mob live strong and healthy lives … How we ensure more people have jobs … How we strengthen culture and language … How we keep alive our 65,000 years of culture and make it stronger,” she said.

“I will be asking the Voice for their input to solve these most pressing issues. So there will be important work in the Voice’s in-tray from day one.

“I want it to be active and engaged. We need new perspectives to old challenges … We need a Voice.”

Against a background of decreasing support for the proposal, Ms Burney said that too often, Aboriginality “condemns” Indigenous people to an early death.

Speaking about her close friend Michael Riley, who died of end stage renal failure, Ms Burney said she was “motivated” to this day by the injustice of his “preventable” death.

“It’s what motivates me every day to put one foot in front of the other, to do better by Indigenous Australians, to do better for future generations,” she said.

“We can and we must do better.”

She said that new data showing just four of 19 closing the gap targets are “on track” is the clearest sign yet something drastic needs to happen, and that a Voice was the best option available.

“We have everything to gain and nothing to lose by supporting the Voice,” she said.

In response to suggestions from the Opposition that the Voice should be legislated, rather than constitutionally enshrined, Ms Burney said there were two main reasons why that would not work.

“One: A Voice or representative body cannot be truly independent or give frank advice if the government of the day can abolish it with the stroke of the pen,” she said.

“Two: It’s what First Nations people requested in the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

“The starting point for reconciliation has to be listening to the wishes of Indigenous people. The starting point cannot be a political fix made in Canberra.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/linda-burney-reveals-first-questions-shell-ask-of-voice-to-parliament/news-story/5bb6aa6f149eacc0b823b03a05104f65

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126410

File: 8aebd875dc298cf⋯.jpg (99.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_min….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19126371

Linda Burney didn’t do enough to reset the voice narrative

SIMON BENSON - JULY 5, 2023

Linda Burney’s mission was simple.

In her address to the press club on Wednesday, the Minister for Indigenous Australians needed to reset the narrative on the voice, clarify its function and begin a new conversation over what Australians are being asked to vote for.

Instead, she lectured the media, warned against the importation of Trumpian politics and offered rhetorical answers to reasonable requests for more detail.

This is telling on two levels.

On one level it reflects an unshakeable belief held by Burney – one seemingly shared by Anthony Albanese - that despite polling to the contrary, the Yes campaign will ultimately prevail.

On another, it implies an inherent admission of a referendum in a state of prefail.

It has been Burney’s inability to present a clear articulation of how the voice will function and what it may or may not provide advice on that has become the critical issue that has undermined her underlying conviction.

Wednesday’s press call was meant to be the reset that would begin to shift the dial back in favour of the Yes case.

The principles were sound.

In linking practical outcomes to the purpose of the voice and implying that it will be the government that dictates what the voice can and cannot make representations on, Burney attempted to reassure waiverers that the voice would not be engaged in the trivial.

But in doing do, and startlingly, the minister left open the possibility that the government could seek to legislate what the voice may or may not be able to make representations on.

Even constitutional lawyers supporting the voice will argue that this would bring the government into direct conflict with the constitutional alteration being proposed.

Burney brings a passion to the voice debate that may inspire many Australians. There can be no question that as one of the country’s leading Indigenous voices, she is more qualified than most in cabinet to speak to this debate.

Her press club recital, and the ease and confidence in answering questions from the media, was perhaps Burney at her best. Charming and engaging with her immediate audience.

But this is not enough.

A greater level of political skill that speaks beyond Canberra will be required to navigate what is now a heavily contested debate.

The Opposition sensed that Burney was a weak spot for the government by singling her out in parliament.

Burney’s speech was an opportunity to try and address this vulnerability.

Any objective assessment must cast doubt on whether that has been achieved in any significant measure. If for no other reason than it left as many questions unanswered as those the government needs to satisfy.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/linda-burney-didnt-do-enough-to-reset-the-voice-narrative/news-story/27ec292be8630bff4195abbe4c5777f5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126419

File: ceaf606c2eb1de5⋯.jpg (95.5 KB,1280x720,16:9,_It_s_an_extraordinary_tim….jpg)

File: 8a31b66c1097c7e⋯.jpg (163.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Actor_Cate_Blanchett_and_d….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Indigenous voice to parliament ‘an incredible opportunity’: Cate Blanchett backs Yes vote

GEORDIE GRAY - JULY 5, 2023

Australian actor Cate Blanchett says this year’s referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament is “an extraordinary time” for Australian history.

The Oscar-winning actor made the comments alongside Kaytetye filmmaker Warwick Thornton while promoting their latest film, The New Boy, which opened the Sydney Film Festival last month.

“It’s an extraordinary time for an extraordinary country,” she told 7.30.

“We have this incredible opportunity to embrace our unique history, shared history, you know, with all of its missteps and all of its successes, to actually evolve into a really modern democracy, like New Zealand, like Canada.”

The New Boy, set in 1940s Australia, is about an unnamed Aboriginal boy (newcomer Aswan Reid) who is captured and taken to a remote Christian orphanage run by the deranged nun Sister Eileen (Blanchett).

Thornton, who has directed acclaimed films like Samson & Delilah (which won him the prestigious Caméra d‘Or prize at Cannes in 2009) and Sweet Country, said that his films give a “voice to the voiceless.”

He said, “Most films I do, it’s about giving people, who are my people, my grandparents, my ancestors, and my grandchildren, a voice that they’ve never had. And that’s incredibly important for me.”

“It’s a strange time,” he said of the voice referendum. “I feel that we’re in a country that feels like a spoilt single child who’d only learned the word ‘no’ and one day needs to learn the word ‘yes’.”

Blanchett compared the voice referendum, with the women’s fight for the right to vote 120 years ago. She said, “Change felt terrible. And the debate was all about, ‘The society is going to collapse.‘ Now, can we imagine a world in Australia where women didn’t have the right to vote? Where their voices weren’t heard? No, we can’t. It’s time we evolved to include all Australians … The more inclusive cultures are, the more vibrant they are.”

“I’m hoping, in another 120 years’ time, we’ll look back at this moment and say, ‘Can you believe we almost missed that opportunity?’”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-an-incredible-opportunity-cate-blanchett-backs-yes-vote/news-story/26728b4cb6739a8a735b99d3e59e9c7c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126430

File: a7b59d2b701e44b⋯.jpg (63.79 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_has_extende….jpg)

File: 543c57767c4b8b9⋯.jpg (70.03 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Drumgold_was_the_lead_p….jpg)

File: 13ce905ea1ea852⋯.jpg (155.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,Mr_Drumgold_and_his_junior….jpg)

>>18928680

>>18954987

Shane Drumgold extends leave from ACT top prosecutor role following Bruce Lehrmann inquiry

COURTNEY GOULD - JULY 5, 2023

The ACT’s top prosecutor has extended his leave for a second time in the wake of a bruising appearance at an inquiry into a high-profile trial.

Shane Drumgold SC has been on leave since May after he faced days of questioning over his claims that he felt pressured not to charge former Coalition staffer Bruce Lehrmann over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins.

Mr Drumgold was due to return to work in mid-June, but his leave was extended to the end of June.

In a short statement ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury confirmed Mr Drumgold had extended his leave again until August 30.

“Anthony Williamson SC will continue to act in the role during this time,” he said.

Mr Lehrmann’s trial was aborted due to jury misconduct and a planned retrial was abandoned due to concerns about Ms Higgins’ mental health.

The charge was dropped and there have been no findings made against him. He maintains his innocence.

Mr Drumgold’s scathing letter to the ACT’s chief of police raising concerns about the “political and police conduct” throughout the investigation and trial sparked the high profile board of inquiry led by former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff.

It examined the conduct of the prosecution, police and the ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates over a 13-day period.

During the inquiry, Mr Drumgold said a series of “strange things” led him to suspect a political conspiracy in the case was “probable, if not possible”.

He later walked back the claim and blamed the concerns he and the office of the DPP had with the police’s conduct on a “likely skills deficit”.

Mr Drumgold also came under fire from barrister Sue Chrysanthou, who was representing journalist Lisa Wilkinson during the inquiry, over whether he effectively warned her not to give a speech should the broadcaster's interview with Ms Higgins win a Logies award.

Mr Lehrmann’s original trial date was vacated due to the publicity that surrounded the victory speech Wilkinson eventually gave.

The Network 10 star gave evidence she was never told not to give the speech.

Mr Drumgold claimed he did advise against it, but conceded notes provided to the court of a Microsoft Teams meeting between Wilkinson, the 10 lawyer, and himself were amended after the fact to include his warning.

He later conceded under intense questioning from Ms Chrysanthou that he should have done more to correct the court’s assumption the notes were made at the time of the meeting.

Mr Sofronoff is understood to be notifying parties involved of his draft findings by Friday and will deliver his recommendations to ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr by the end of the month.

The findings will not be made public until after the government assesses the report.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/shane-drumgold-extends-leave-from-act-top-prosecutor-role-following-bruce-lehrmann-inquiry/news-story/a88ad22cb058b0834b429d54f936ffc2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126437

File: 57258c985eda34e⋯.jpg (2.34 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Australia_s_Prime_Minister….jpg)

>>19120607

Australia PM says Hong Kong bounty on overseas activists 'unacceptable'

Kirsty Needham - July 5, 2023

SYDNEY, July 5 (Reuters) - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Wednesday it was "unacceptable" that Hong Kong has put bounties on two Australian residents who are among eight overseas democracy activists wanted under a national security law.

Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee said on Tuesday eight overseas-based Hong Kong activists who were issued with arrest warrants for alleged national security offences would be "pursued for life".

Hong Kong police have offered rewards of HK$1 million ($127,656) for information leading to the arrest of the eight, including Melbourne lawyer and Australian citizen Kevin Yam, and former Hong Kong lawmaker Ted Hui, who has lived in Australia since 2021.

"It's just unacceptable," Albanese said of the Hong Kong announcement in a Nine television interview. "We will continue to cooperate with China where we can, but we will disagree where we must. And we do disagree over human rights issues."

Australia's opposition leader Peter Dutton said it was "completely unacceptable that Australians should be tracked down or hunted down".

The Hong Kong activists are accused of asking foreign powers to impose sanctions on Hong Kong, and are wanted under a national security law that Beijing imposed on the former British colony in 2020.

Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia is concerned by the broad application of the national security law to arrest or pressure pro-democracy figures and civil society.

Chinese and Hong Kong authorities say the law has restored the stability necessary for preserving the Asian financial centre's economic success. China's foreign ministry said countries should "stop providing a safe haven for fugitives".

In a radio interview on Wednesday, Hui said Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade had contacted him to offer protection. Yam confirmed to Reuters he had also been offered protection.

Australia suspended its extradition treaty with Hong Kong in 2020, and a foreign interference law makes it illegal for foreign powers to monitor dissidents or silence community members from exercising freedom of speech.

The other dissidents facing Hong Kong bounties, living in the U.S. and Britain, have had bank accounts frozen, Hui told ABC radio.

"Some of them can be frightened, but they are assured that there is no immediate or imminent threat against them personally. But in terms of travel, in terms of bank account, in terms of financial support they are a bit worried now," he said.

Yam, who migrated to Australia as a 10 year old, said on Twitter: "I am not a fugitive. I left Hong Kong through its international airport openly in 2022. I am an Australian citizen now living in Australia."

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australia-pm-says-hong-kong-bounty-overseas-activists-unacceptable-2023-07-05/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126468

File: dcca5c368db625c⋯.mp4 (8.74 MB,640x360,16:9,Hong_Kong_activists_to_be_….mp4)

File: ea8dfec65b60507⋯.jpg (73.36 KB,1280x720,16:9,Kevin_Yam_one_of_eight_peo….jpg)

>>19120607

Australian businesses in the dark about China’s new spy laws

WILL GLASGOW - JULY 5, 2023

1/2

Beijing’s new anti-espionage laws, which came into effect days before Hong Kong police put a bounty on two Australian residents, have further raised the risk Australian companies could have staff ­detained for what would be deemed ordinary business activities outside of China.

The brazen extraterritorial application of Hong Kong’s sweeping National Security Law in Melbourne and Adelaide on Monday has underlined just how serious Xi Jinping’s regime is about snuffing out behaviour it deems “anti China” and a threat to the Communist Party’s rule.

It shocked many Australians with dealings in China, a country already known for arbitrary detention. Concerns were already elevated over Beijing’s new anti-espionage laws, which took effect over the weekend.

Unease about Beijing’s crackdown came as Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the Australian government was “deeply disappointed” by the news of the arrest warrants for Australian resident Ted Hui and Australian citizen Kevin Yam, who she met in Adelaide in January.

Mr Yam, who is now doing graduate studies at Melbourne University, said the supportive reaction he had received since the arrest warrant showed how far Hong Kong’s reputation had sunk.

“Normally if someone has an arrest warrant against them, to use an Australian term, you’re a bit of a dodgy bastard and it’s time to shun you,” he told The Australian.

“It says a lot about how far Hong Kong has fallen that people think that having a Hong Kong national security arrest warrant is a badge of honour.”

Three sources familiar with the situation said that Australia’s China-focused business chambers had not yet received specific briefings on the change from the Australian government.

One said the Australian system appeared to lack the capacity to follow the lead of America’s intelligence agencies, which have been stepping up their briefings of the risks for American businesses with a presence in China since April.

“They should be though. People are at risk of being detained for what used to be ordinary business activities,” the source said.

Some Australian companies have already adjusted their behaviour in China. “The smart, leading companies fully recognise that the risks have gone up an octave,” said a source who advises businesses with operations in China.

Australian security agencies routinely give briefings about risks to corporate security officers, CEOs and company directors.

A spokeswoman at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade would not comment on whether briefings had been given to Australian businesses and universities about China’s new anti-espionage laws. But she noted that Beijing’s updates “include provisions which appear to broaden the application of those laws”.

The Australian government’s Smartraveller website has warned since 2020 that “Australians may be at risk of arbitrary detention or harsh enforcement of local laws, including broadly defined ­National Security Laws”.

Australian citizens Cheng Lei, a state media television journalist, and Yang Hengjun, a democracy writer, have been in China’s penal system for years on vague espionage charges.

Mirriam-Grace MacIntyre, who leads the counterintelligence centre at the US Office of the ­Director of National Intelligence, said the revised law expanded the definition of espionage without defining terms in a way that was “deeply problematic for private sector companies”.

American officials have been flagging to companies a State Department travel advisory in March urging Americans to reconsider travel to China, citing Beijing’s ­arbitrary enforcement of laws and use of exit bans blocking the ­departure of some US citizens.

“An executive’s decision to travel is their own personal decision,” said Ms MacIntyre. Her team wanted to ensure business travellers knew the risks.

Beijing has said that the rights of foreign businesses are protected under Chinese law. “As long as one abides by laws and regulations, there is no need to worry,” a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said recently.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126474

File: 5cf2c935788aa08⋯.jpg (193.65 KB,825x441,275:147,SPW_5.jpg)

>>19126468

2/2

The bounties put on the heads of two Australian residents by Hong Kong cops are part of an ongoing effort by Beijing to police how China is discussed around the world. Days before the announcement by Hong Kong police, a Chinese diplomat attempted to stop the son of arrested Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai from speaking at a United Nations event in Geneva.

Richard McGregor, senior fellow for East Asia at the Lowy Institute, said an Australian citizen had been charged by Beijing with a “thought crime”.

“The ‘Hong Kong Eight’ are essentially being accused of political crimes, and in some respects, old-fashioned thought crimes, for simply disagreeing with the territory’s National Security Law,” Mr McGregor told The Australian.

“It may look purely symbolic but it means someone like Kevin Yam, an Australian, will have to fly over many Asian countries which have extradition treaties with China before he can land somewhere safely,” he said.

On Tuesday, Hong Kong’s leader John Lee called on the ­activists to surrender to police.

“The only way to end their destiny of being an abscondee, who will be pursued for life, is to surrender,” the Hong Kong chief executive told reporters, adding they would otherwise “spend their days in fear”.

Mr Lee was Hong Kong’s security boss when the National Security Law was imposed three years ago following Beijing’s instructions.

Hong Kong’s police force said a reward of HK$1m (AUD$191,800) would be given to people who provide information that would lead to the arrest of each of the eight ­accused.

Senator Wong on Tuesday said she had “deep concerns, about the national security laws in Hong Kong, and about their broad application.”

“Australia has a view about freedom of expression, we have a view about people‘s right to express their political views peacefully, and people in Australia who do so in accordance with our laws will be supported. We will support those in Australia who exercise these rights.”

Mr Yam, a Hawthorn AFL fan, worked as a commercial lawyer in Hong Kong for two decades before returning to Melbourne in 2022. The Hong Kong arrest warrant accuses the Australian citizen of “collusion”, citing meetings with “foreign government leaders” last November, an apparent reference to a trip he took to Canberra to meet federal politicians.

The University of Melbourne, which is taking its first delegation to China since the pandemic, did not comment on Mr Yam’s situation when asked on Tuesday.

Ted Hui, a former Hong Kong pro-democracy politician who sought political asylum in Australia in 2021 and now lives in Adelaide, was with Mr Yam on the November trip to Canberra.

The latest allegations against Mr Hui were prominently covered in China’s state media. He is accused of inciting secession, inciting subversion of state power and collusion with external forces, three of the four crimes in the ­National Security Law.

“It’s making it very apparent to the world that China is progressing towards more extreme authoritarianism,” Mr Hui said.

Opposition defence spokesman James Paterson, one of the politicians Mr Yam and Mr Hui met last November, said the Coalition was “gravely concerned” over the police bounties.

“This represents an unacceptable attempt to silence and intimidate critics of the Chinese government living in Australia, and further demonstrates the corrosive effects of the National Security Law to democratic principles and the rule of law in Hong Kong,” Senator Paterson said on Tuesday.

“Australia must always defend the fundamental values of democracy including freedom of speech and assembly and can never tolerate attempts to undermine the safety and freedom of Australians.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/australian-businesses-in-the-dark-about-chinas-new-spy-laws/news-story/b9ef7cd4ea1bcbbc4cf974cdd44796b7

https://twitter.com/SenatorWong/status/1676051440543096832

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126504

File: 8443cf1b239141d⋯.jpg (1017.66 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Chinese_Foreign_Ministry_s….jpg)

File: d0b3d42fdbb45db⋯.jpg (253.08 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Legal_expert_Kevin_Yam_say….jpg)

>>19120607

China tells Australia to stop harbouring Hong Kong 'fugitives', DFAT updates travel advice

Erin Handley - 5 July 2023

1/3

China's Foreign Ministry has told Australia to stop sheltering fugitives, after Foreign Minister Penny Wong expressed deep concern over Hong Kong issuing arrest warrants for eight overseas-based activists, including two living in Australia.

Australian citizen and legal scholar Kevin Yam, and former Hong Kong politician Ted Hui, who fled the island and now lives in Adelaide, were among the eight people wanted for alleged breaches under the controversial national security law.

Hong Kong Police have doubled down on the arrest warrants, while Hong Kong's chief executive said they would be "pursued for life".

"I am of course disappointed. I've said we'll cooperate with China where we can. But we will disagree where we must," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told ABC News Breakfast.

"This decision overnight is an example of where Australia and China do have different approaches to these issues. And we'll stand up for our values."

Asked about the condemnation from Western countries, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning alleged Mr Yam and the others had engaged in "anti-China activities aimed at destabilising Hong Kong".

"We strongly deplore and firmly oppose individual countries' flagrant slandering against the national security law for Hong Kong and interference in the rule of law in Hong Kong," she said.

"Relevant countries need to respect China's sovereignty and the rule of law in Hong Kong, stop lending support for anti-China elements destabilising Hong Kong, and stop providing a safe haven for fugitives."

She said since the exiles fled Hong Kong, "they have acted in an even more outrageous way to create trouble and continued to instigate the division of the country and subversion of state power, acting as pawns for external anti-China forces in their effort to interfere in Hong Kong affairs".

She added, "their abominable moves gravely violate the national security law for Hong Kong" and jeopardise China's sovereignty and security.

The other high-profile exiles, based in the United States and the United Kingdom, are activists Nathan Law, Anna Kwok and Finn Lau, former politician Dennis Kwok, unionist Christopher Mung and online commentator Elmer Yuen.

They are wanted for crimes including colluding with foreign forces and incitement to secession for encouraging sanctions "to destroy Hong Kong and to intimidate officials", Hong Kong police have said.

Police have also offered rewards of $HK1 million ($190,000) for information leading to each possible arrest.

The activists rose to prominence during widespread protests in the city in 2019, triggered by a controversial extradition law that demonstrators feared could endanger dissidents and undermine freedoms Hong Kong enjoyed.

The arrest warrants drew criticism from Senator Wong, as well as the US and the UK.

A US State Department spokesman said it set "a dangerous precedent that threatens the human rights and fundamental freedoms of people all over the world".

British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said his government would "not tolerate any attempts by China to intimidate and silence individuals in the UK and overseas".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126507

File: c4331ec5b70a154⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,4240x2832,265:177,Ted_Hui_a_former_high_prof….jpg)

File: f4edc74a483d14b⋯.jpg (61.7 KB,1242x699,414:233,The_prime_minister_says_he….jpg)

>>19126504

2/3

DFAT updated Hong Kong travel advice

Ahead of the recent arrest warrants, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade recently updated its travel advice for Australians to the territory, warning that Hong Kong's National Security Law could be applied to activities that occurred outside Hong Kong.

"We've reviewed our advice for Hong Kong. We haven't changed the level of our advice, exercise a high degree of caution," the June 23 update read.

"Hong Kong's National Security Law could be interpreted broadly, and you could break the law without intending to. If you're concerned about the law, reconsider your need to remain in Hong Kong."

Speaking to Patricia Karvelas on RN Breakfast, Ted Hui said while he did not feel he was in danger within Australia, DFAT had given him a courtesy call asking if he needed protection.

"As long as the Australian government doesn't kick me out of the country, then I feel absolutely safe here," he said.

"I don't really need security guards and other things like that, but perhaps some visa assistance, so that I can stay here while I'm doing my advocacy work."

Mr Hui fled Hong Kong in late 2020 for Europe, arriving in Australia in March 2021 on a temporary bridging visa, which he said had no expiry date.

He hopes to attain permanent residency here but says he has not been given any guarantees and his ability to travel is restricted, in part due to the risk of kidnapping and extradition.

"Maybe my family will be a little bit worried, with the kids, that they don't know how long they can stay, and if they ever were to have to leave the country, there can be other dangers that they may face."

He said Hong Kong has undergone a "drastic" change since the introduction of the "draconian" national security law.

"I never could imagine that Hong Kong would just fall down so deeply," he said.

"It's unrecognisable. This is not a free and open society anymore.

"There's no protest. There is no free press, and all of the leaders of the free press are now in jail. There is no opposition … movies have been banned, protest songs have been banned.

Mr Yam yesterday told ABC News Radio it was "outrageous" that Hong Kong authorities were trying to interfere with an Australian citizen's rights to express himself in his own country.

Both Mr Yam and Mr Hui said the step reflected poorly on China's authoritarianism and the bleak future of Hong Kong, and they would not be deterred from speaking out about the erosion of freedoms in the territory.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126512

File: 1a31fda6ddbbf2d⋯.jpg (3.59 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Penny_Wong_says_Australia_….jpg)

>>19126507

3/3

PM urged to re-think China trip

"The only way to end their destiny of being an absconder who will be pursued for life is to surrender," Hong Kong chief executive John Lee told reporters yesterday.

Liberal senator James Paterson, the acting Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister, told ABC News Radio's Thomas Oriti the arrest warrants were "disturbing enough", but the follow-up comments from Mr Lee were "deeply chilling".

"In the case of Kevin Yam, who is an Australian citizen, all he is accused of is engaging in completely legitimate freedom of speech and political activism as an Australian citizen in Australia," Senator Paterson said.

"And for that crime, in the eyes of the Hong Kong government — which we know is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party — he'll be pursued for the rest of his life.

"This is not a trivial concern, it means that he cannot safely travel to any country in the world that has an extradition treaty with either Hong Kong or China — it has a very real impact on his life."

He suggested the prime minister should re-consider his China trip later this year.

"The prime minister really does need to consider what look it would send for him to travel later to China this year and stand beside [Chinese President] Xi Jinping, smiling and shaking hands, while the Chinese government has a bounty out on the head of Australian citizens."

"It could withdraw these warrants at any time, if it wants to have a strong bilateral relationship with Australia."

The office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet has been contacted for comment.

Mr Albanese earlier told the ABC that he continued to advocate for the interests of Australia, including raising the issue of the ongoing detention of Australian citizen Cheng Lei, a journalist and mother of two who has been detained since August 2020.

Hong Kong Police told the ABC they would take "all the necessary measures in accordance with the law to stop those absconders from conducting activities endangering national security".

"The group of absconders are suspected of committing serious crimes under the National Security Law. No-one should use the freedom of speech or the rights of procession and demonstration … as an excuse to commit illegal acts," they said in a statement.

They added the freedom of speech and rights of demonstration in public have always been protected under local laws.

"However, these freedoms and rights are not absolute, and may be subject to restrictions such as those for the protection of national security or public order."

A spokesperson for global police agency Interpol said that as of Tuesday, it had not received requests for a Red Notice — a wanted persons diffusion — for the eight individuals mentioned.

The agency said member countries could ask Interpol to issue a Red Notice for an individual who was the subject of a valid national arrest warrant, but added requests were reviewed for compliance with Interpol rules and human rights, and assessed whether the individual concerned was a refugee or political activist.

Anna Kwok, one of the activists now based in Washington DC, told Reuters that she would continue highlighting China's crackdown on freedoms and the rule of law in Hong Kong.

"I believe the values we're fighting for are right. And that's why I'm never going to stop, and I'm never going to back down, even though there's a bounty on my head," she said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-05/china-tells-australia-stop-harbouring-fugitives-hong-kong/102562300

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126523

File: 6aadef8d339c8ae⋯.jpg (48.2 KB,600x481,600:481,Foreign_Ministry_Spokesper….jpg)

>>19120607

>>19126504

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on July 4, 2023

CCTV: The Hong Kong police issued arrest warrants on July 3 for eight anti-China rioters who have fled overseas, including Kevin Yam. The US, the UK and Australia expressed their concern and even “condemned” the decision. What is China’s comment?

Mao Ning: We strongly deplore and firmly oppose individual countries’ flagrant slandering against the national security law for Hong Kong and interference in the rule of law in the Hong Kong SAR.

Kevin Yam and the others have long been engaging in anti-China activities aimed at destabilizing Hong Kong. After fleeing overseas, they have acted in an even more outrageous way to create trouble and continued to instigate the division of the country and subversion of state power, acting as pawns for external anti-China forces in their effort to interfere in Hong Kong affairs. Their abominable moves gravely violate the national security law for Hong Kong, seriously threaten the bottom line of One Country, Two Systems, severely harm the fundamental interests of Hong Kong and gravely jeopardize China’s sovereignty, security and development interests. Justice will never be late or absent. The Hong Kong police issued arrest warrants for these destabilizing elements in accordance with the national security law and other local laws. This is a just act that meets the aspiration of the people and upholds the rule of law, a necessary act for safeguarding the authority of the national security law and protecting the nation’s sovereignty and security, and a legitimate act for consolidating the fruits of ending chaos and ensuring lasting stability in Hong Kong. This act is also consistent with international law and customary practice.

I would like to reiterate that Hong Kong affairs are purely China’s internal affairs and brook no meddling by any external forces. Relevant countries need to respect China’s sovereignty and the rule of law in Hong Kong, stop lending support for anti-China elements destabilizing Hong Kong, and stop providing a safe haven for fugitives. China remains firmly resolved in safeguarding the nation’s sovereignty, security and development interests, in implementing One Country, Two Systems, and in opposing interference in Hong Kong affairs by any external forces.

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/202307/t20230704_11107557.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126537

File: ca3726e23f332ea⋯.jpg (128.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,An_activist_sprays_paint_o….jpg)

File: db71ba77bdc6463⋯.jpg (72.17 KB,768x768,1:1,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 3dedb9170af529c⋯.jpg (124.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ted_Hui_left_and_Kevin_Yam….jpg)

File: dc05ebfbb8fa9ce⋯.jpg (63 KB,1024x768,4:3,Outspoken_critic_of_Hong_K….jpg)

>>19120607

>>19126504

Anthony Albanese should reconsider rapprochement with China

GREG SHERIDAN - JULY 5, 2023

Penny Wong was right to warn the Chinese government of the existence of strong foreign interference legislation in Australia, after Hong Kong authorities ­issued arrest warrants for two democracy activists now resident in Australia.

Hong Kong’s national security police also offered $HK1m rewards for information that leads to the capture of lawyer Kevin Yam, an Australian citizen, and former Hong Kong legislator Ted Hui, who lives in Adelaide.

The Foreign Minister expressed her “deep disappointment” at the Chinese actions, and reiterated that Canberra had long held deep concerns about the ­application of national security laws in Hong Kong.

Wong said: “I want to be very clear. Australia has a view about freedom of expression, we have a view about people’s right to express their views peacefully, and people in Australia who do so in accordance with our laws will be supported.”

Her comments make it clear the official Chinese actions represent an ugly effort to intimidate Australia, to intimidate the diaspora and ethnic Chinese community within Australia, and to intimidate the two democracy ­activists named.

The Australian government has an overwhelming operational responsibility now to make sure no agents of the Chinese government, and no one inspired by their effective call to persecution, can act against any Australians.

Wong recognises this in her further statement: “We have strong laws in relation to foreign interference. Our position on this is unequivocal. And any alle­gations about foreign interference will be investigated by the appropriate authorities.”

This is as brutal and naked a confrontation as Beijing and Canberra had at any time during the so-called wolf warrior diplomacy phase that Beijing indulged in for a couple of years.

Some Chinese national security laws explicitly apply to non-Chinese citizens and residents. They are extraterritorial in nature. They must also be seen in tandem with another new foreign relations law Beijing has recently enacted, which gives it the explicit authority to act against entities that behave in ways “detrimental to China’s interests”.

This law, like the National Security Law, is vague, sweeping and intimidatory.

These developments should cause the Albanese government to reconsider the path of rapprochement it is undertaking with Beijing.

For all the supposed new calmness in the relationship, Beijing still holds several Australians in its prisons on trumped-up political charges, it still enacts a range of trade boycotts against Australia and, as these actions make clear, it still attempts to intimidate and interfere with our politics.

While it’s sensible for the Albanese government to pursue a ­stable relationship with Beijing, while not compromising our national interests or values, it should not make a close relationship in itself an object of our foreign policy. Because in the end, Beijing wants to compromise and diminish key Australian national interests.

There is a dangerous political dynamic setting up now, because of the interaction of four factors. The Albanese government is seeking a stable relationship with Beijing. The Chinese government believes it played a role in ­getting ethnic-Chinese Australians to vote against the Morrison government.

The Left of the Labor Party is stridently opposed to AUKUS, the Quad and many elements of our alliance with the US.

And the Albanese government is subject to repeated, foolish ­attacks by Paul Keating.

The danger is the government will be tempted to get some critics off its back by prioritising “good relations” with Beijing, while if there are troubles in the relationship, no matter how egregious Beijing’s behaviour might be, a class of critics will flay the government for not succeeding in producing a good relationship.

This means Beijing effectively gets to reward or punish an Australian government within our own politics.

That’s bad, even dangerous.

The Albanese government should rethink this position and probably draw back.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-should-reconsider-rapprochement-with-china/news-story/3ae60d9b597e9636074968b040d4b592

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126550

File: d3bc584afa66aef⋯.jpg (56.73 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_Chinese_DJI_Inspire_dron….jpg)

File: 4697d0ab56d6e7e⋯.jpg (90.96 KB,1024x768,4:3,Opposition_cyber_security_….jpg)

>>18708561 (pb)

>>18814613 (pb)

>>18890116 (pb)

Calls for Chinese-made DJI drones to be removed after 3000 devices found across government

ELLEN WHINNETT - JULY 4, 2023

1/2

More than 3000 drones and other devices manufactured by Chinese company DJI are owned by federal government agencies, despite the People’s Liberation Army-linked technology being black-listed in the US.

A government-wide audit by opposition cyber security spokesman James Paterson has revealed 3114 drones, cameras and other DJI-manufactured devices were in the possession of agencies ranging from the National Portrait Gallery of Australia to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

Some devices are batteries and gimbals – camera stabilisers that do not connect to the internet – but most are cameras and drones with internet connectivity.

The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation has at least 1668 devices, of which 86 are drones used to gather data and images of agricultural sites and wildlife monitoring.

The organisation is reviewing its use of the technology and has stopped connecting them to CSIRO internet systems.

Defence has uncovered 800 DJI drones across its operations, far more than the 450 that were known to have been acquired by the army.

The drones, which were grounded in May because of sec­urity concerns, were also being used by the navy, air force, Defence Science and Technology Group and cadets.

Discovery of the widespread use of DJI technology comes after more than 1000 CCTV cameras and other surveillance devices from Chinese firms Hikvision and Dahua were removed from government premises, including electorate offices and Defence sites.

Senator Paterson said the widespread use of the DJI devices demonstrated the need for Australia to follow the example of Britain and introduce a new office within the Department of Home Affairs to assess risks posed by technology originating from “auth­oritarian countries.’’

“(It) should map and remove problematic technology embedded in government systems, while also assessing emerging technologies before they are deployed to ensure appropriate mitigations are in place,’’ he said.

In June, Britain established a national security unit for procurement to investigate potential suppliers and assess whether they should be allowed to bid for government contracts.

While Chinese technology has been embedded in government agencies for decades, including during the Coalition government’s time in office, the issue has taken on renewed urgency because of heightened geopolitical tensions, and cyber becoming a frontline weapon of war.

Australia’s Five Eyes intelligence partners, particularly the US, have begun cracking down hard on Chinese tech.

“The Albanese government should act now before it’s too late to mitigate the risk of products being weaponised to conduct cyber disruptions, surveillance and large-scale foreign interference,’’ Senator Paterson said.

He said the government was playing “whack-a-mole’’ with Chinese tech and quietly removing technology from agencies only after public outcry.

Cyber Security Minister Clare O’Neil’s office declined to comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126552

File: ceeacd1c3792005⋯.jpg (55.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,NSW_Police_s_special_servi….jpg)

File: 3f6511a9a0e1a58⋯.jpg (154.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_CSIRO_s_Black_Mountain….jpg)

>>19126550

2/2

A CSIRO spokesperson said the organisation owned DJI 86 drones, 32 extra drone cameras and a number of accessories such as batteries. “The drones are used for research purposes including data and image capture of agricultural sites and wildlife monitoring,’’ they said.

“We are currently engaging with relevant agencies across government to review the use of these drones to ensure our policies are in line with the latest government advice.

“While that review is under way, we have taken mitigation steps to ensure security is not compromised such as ensuring the drones are never connected to a CSIRO system.’’

Some 38 government agencies have confirmed that they operate DJI equipment, including the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (six devices), Veterans’ Affairs (four devices), Foreign ­Affairs and Trade (15 devices), and Climate Change and Energy (82 devices).

Many of them are likely to be used by their media units.

It has previously been confirmed that the ABC and SBS used the devices.

The Australian Border Force has stopped using its 420 DJI devices, and the Australian Federal Police said it was “transitioning’’ away from the technology.

The world’ largest drone manufacturer, DJI – also known as Da Jiang Innovations – is headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, and is subject to China’s 2017 national security laws that require all China-based companies to co-operate with Beijing’s intelligence agencies.

The company has been black-listed by the Pentagon for what the Americans say is links to the People’s Liberation Army, and it has clear ownership links back to the Chinese state. There are concerns the devices could be used for data-harvesting, and they are considered a moral risk because the technology is used in surveillance of the persecuted Uighur minority in China.

The Attorney-General, Mark Dreyfus, can issue a government-wide ban to DJI via an update to Australia’s Protective Security Policy Framework, but so far has acted only against Chinese-owned social media behemoth TikTok, which was banned from installation on all government devices.

Hikvision and Dahua were removed from all agencies without a formal ban.

The Attorney-General’s Department said: “The Australian government continually assesses Australia’s security policy settings to ensure they remain fit for purpose.’’

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/calls-for-chinesemade-dji-drones-to-be-removed-after-3000-devices-found-across-government/news-story/d73f2ec98b151d012d15200b9fa0ceac

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19126586

File: 29e3fa49e316aef⋯.jpg (229.31 KB,1024x576,16:9,A_rescued_victim_1_.jpg)

File: f9370e7225df617⋯.jpg (283.57 KB,576x1024,9:16,A_rescued_victim_2_.jpg)

File: ef1a04c82ff5f4f⋯.jpg (244.12 KB,576x1024,9:16,A_rescued_victim_3_.jpg)

File: cf612e5f2b96da2⋯.jpg (277.32 KB,836x879,836:879,Sexual_assault_help_and_su….jpg)

Airport luggage search of Queensland man at Sydney Airport leads to the rescue of 16 children from alleged sexual abuse overseas

Ciara Jones - 5 July 2023

A search of a Queensland man's luggage at Sydney Airport has resulted in a record number of children being rescued from alleged sexual abuse overseas.

Police say 16 children in the Philippines have been "removed from harm" by local authorities after a major international child protection investigation.

The children — the youngest aged 10 — were found during raids at four locations in Taguig and Nueva Vizcaya in the country's north.

The operation began in January when Australian Border Force (ABF) officers at Sydney Airport examined a Queensland man's bags following his return from the Philippines.

They searched the man's phone and allegedly found child abuse material and messages "detailing his intent" to pay someone to sexually abuse children overseas.

ABF officers alerted the Australian Federal Police (AFP) who shared the information with the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Philippine Internet Crimes Against Children Centre.

Federal police began investigating the 56-year-old man, who has since been charged with three offences including possessing child abuse material and grooming a person to engage in sexual activity with a child outside of Australia.

A warrant has been issued for the man's arrest after he allegedly failed to appear in a Sydney court in May.

Detective Superintendent Andrew Perkins from the AFP said it was a significant operation.

"This is a record number of children rescued … however these children's lives have been irrevocably damaged and we know there are too many children still at risk," he said.

"This case highlights how vital it is for law enforcement agencies to share intelligence and resources globally, because predators are not confined by borders."

An investigation by PNP is ongoing to find other children allegedly identified during the operation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-05/international-investigation-rescues-children-from-abuse/102563598

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-media/media-releases/afp-intel-leads-record-child-rescue-operation-philippines

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19132052

File: 3b94a9869dd6c04⋯.mp4 (15.19 MB,640x360,16:9,Donald_Trump_Jr_tour_postp….mp4)

File: a55fa862e4c3c85⋯.jpg (100.31 KB,1240x744,5:3,Donald_Trump_Jr_was_to_spe….jpg)

File: ba45634bb5573eb⋯.jpg (585.71 KB,1297x1414,1297:1414,TPA_1.jpg)

File: 6679723df21335b⋯.jpg (80.41 KB,960x938,480:469,358374824_579670614339446_….jpg)

>>18965978

>>19044166

>>19105135

Donald Trump Jr’s Australian speaking tour delayed, promoter says

Turning Point Australia says appearances of former president’s son in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne postponed ‘due to unforeseen circumstances’

Josh Taylor - 5 Jul 2023

A speaking tour from the son of the former US president Donald Trump has been delayed, the tour promoter announced on Wednesday.

Donald Trump Jr was to speak at events in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, kicking off this Sunday. However Turning Point Australia announced on Wednesday that “due to unforeseen circumstances” the appearances would be postponed.

“Ticket holders are urged to hold onto their tickets, with details of the rescheduled date to be confirmed in the coming days,” the announcement said. “Ticket holders will be contacted directly … with details.”

In a Facebook post on Wednesday, Turning Point Australia wrote, “It seems America isn’t the only country that makes it difficult for the Trumps.

“Hold onto your tickets, this is a short delay nothing more #CancelCulture.

“Apologies for any inconveniences especially those who had long travel plans.”

Tickets for the events ranged in price, including $89 tickets, $295 for a meet-and-greet, and up to $2,500 for a private dinner.

The tour was also to bring Brexiter Nigel Farage to Australia. The Liberal senator Alexander Antic was another scheduled speaker.

Farage had appeared on Sky News’ Paul Murray Live to promote the tour in recent weeks. Guardian Australia has sought comment from Turning Point Australia.

A spokesperson for the immigration minister, Andrew Giles, said the government would not comment on individual visa cases.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/05/donald-trump-jrs-australian-speaking-tour-has-been-delayed-promoter-says

https://www.facebook.com/TurningPointAustralia/posts/579670617672779

https:// www. theage. com. au/ national/ donald- trump- jr- tour- postponed- 20230706- p5dm3v .html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19132058

File: 048e6e99198768d⋯.jpg (228.49 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Donald_Trump_Jr_s_live_spe….jpg)

File: c56f0259b5ef46f⋯.jpg (364.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,IMPORTANT_ANNOUNCEMENT.jpg)

File: fca2ee54c91e587⋯.jpg (646.67 KB,1168x1770,584:885,Stop_Donald_Trump_Jr_getti….jpg)

>>19132052

Donald Trump jnr cancels anti-cancel culture tour amid visa doubts

Matthew Knott - July 5, 2023

Donald Trump’s eldest son has cancelled a planned speaking tour of Australia just days before he was due to arrive in the country amid doubts over whether the Albanese government would grant him a visa.

Donald Trump jnr was scheduled to make appearances in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne between July 9 and July 11, but organisers abruptly announced on Wednesday afternoon that the “landmark” tour had been postponed “due to unforeseen circumstances”.

“Ticket holders are urged to hold on to their tickets, with details of the rescheduled date to be confirmed in the coming days,” event organiser Turning Point Australia said in a statement posted to the tour website.

Some commentators, including former Labor speechwriter and The Australian columnist Troy Bramston, had called for Trump jnr’s visa to be cancelled on character grounds because of his role in promoting misinformation about voter fraud in the 2020 US presidential election and the COVID-19 pandemic.

A change.org petition calling for Trump jnr to be denied a visa to Australia had attracted 21,725 signatures as of Wednesday evening.

Government sources who were not permitted to speak publicly said that Trump jnr was granted a visa to travel to Australia on Wednesday morning, before the cancellation of the tour was announced.

“It’s his choice whether he comes or not but there is no immigration impediment to him coming,” a spokesman for Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil said.

A spokeswoman for Immigration Minister Andrew Giles said she was not able to comment on individual cases.

In the lead-up to the tour, Trump jnr said it was clear “the same disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture that’s crippled the US has clearly taken hold” in Australia.

“It is the biggest existential threat we face in the West and is literally the decay of Western society,” he said.

Speaking on Sky News, Labor MP Graham Perrett said he had heard that ticket sales for the tour were “tanking” which could help explain the last-minute cancellation.

There has also been speculation that the high cost of providing security for Trump jnr may have made the tour financially unfeasible.

The Migration Act says that the government can deny a visa on character grounds if the applicant is likely to vilify segments of the Australian community, engage in harassment or intimidation, or “incite discord” with their views.

General admission tickets for the tour, which also featured former UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage and Liberal Senator Alex Antic, were selling for $89 while backstage passes that included a drink of champagne with Trump jnr were selling for $495.

The tour website said the former president’s son’s “fearlessly outspoken, anti-politically correct stance has captured the imagination of conservatives from around the world”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/donald-trump-jr-cancels-anti-cancel-culture-tour-amid-visa-doubts-20230705-p5dm0l.html

https://www.change.org/p/stop-donald-trump-jr-getting-an-australian-visa

https://www.trumplive.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19132063

File: 260445833025630⋯.jpg (242.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_president_Donald_Tr….jpg)

File: 413b3b698618bb2⋯.jpg (218.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Minister_for_Home_Affairs_….jpg)

File: 8c5cf697596051d⋯.jpg (244.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Trump_Jr_places_a_hand_on_….jpg)

File: fac5dbe982cd8e2⋯.jpg (359.36 KB,825x1176,275:392,SM_1.jpg)

>>19132052

Clare O’Neil forced to delete tweet calling Donald Trump Jr ‘big baby’

TRICIA RIVERA - JULY 6, 2023

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil has been forced to delete a tweet in which she attacked the son of former US President Donald Trump as a “sore loser” and “just a big baby, who isn’t very popular” after the Prime Minister’s Office intervened and directed her to take it down.

Ms O’Neil also stamped out suggestions his Australian speaking tour was cancelled due to visa issues.

Turning Point Australia, the organisers for the tour, announced on Wednesday that the speaking engagements in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane would be postponed due to unforeseen circumstances.

The touring company released a statement detailing the postponement was due to a “the delay in the arrival of a visa for Donald Trump Jr to enter Australia.”

Ms O’Neil on Thursday took to Twitter to respond to the claims and remained firm that the eldest son of former US president Donald Trump was granted a visa.

“Geez, Donald Trump Jr is a bit of a sore loser. His dad lost an election fair and square - but he says it was stolen,” she wrote.

“Now he’s trying to blame the Australian Government for his poor ticket sales and cancelled tour. Donald Trump Jr has been given a visa to come to Australia.

“He didn’t get cancelled. He’s just a big baby, who isn’t very popular.”

Immigration Minister Andrew Giles backed the comments, suggesting the tour was cancelled due to ticket sales.

“The visa was dealt with in the normal manner. Any issue that Mr. Trump has or his promoters have that go to the postponement of the tour is a matter entirely for them. It may of course be that the reason for the postponement goes to the lack of enthusiasm for ticket sales, rather than any of the issues that they’ve raised,” he said in a press conference in Sydney.

He said Mr Trump Jr’s visa would have been processed as normal and in line with Australia’s immigration system.

“Now I‘d be really clear about this. I don’t share many of Mr Trump’s views but that is entirely irrelevant to decision making. He is entitled to express them if he meets the requirements of the Migration Act,” Mr Giles said.

“Any matters going to the postponement of this tour are entirely for Mr. Trump Jr. and of course his tour promoters.”

Tour organisers said 8,000 tickets had been sold across the three states.

“The visa, which has now been issued, was only received late afternoon of Wednesday 5 July, only 24 hours before Donald Trump Jr was set to board a flight to Sydney,” the Turning Point Australia statement said.

Their website advised ticket holders to keep their passes and that a new rescheduled date would be confirmed in the coming days.

Shadow Home Affairs Minister James Paterson said the government should detail how the visa application was processed.

“If it is the case that the Department of Home Affairs was just going through its usual processes and they took time, that’s one thing. If it’s the case that the department went slow on that because of the nature of the application, that would be something very different indeed,” he said.

Prices for tickets to Donald Trump Jr. Live! show range from $89 for general admission and go up to $495 for a VIP seat, after show backstage party and a champagne and photo with Donald Trump Jr.

A private dinner ticket was also advertised, however no price was detailed.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/home-affairs-minister-clare-oneil-calls-donald-trump-jr-a-big-baby-over-cancelled-tour/news-story/9f10244ceb409471bd44d4ae005d5c79

https://twitter.com/sharrimarkson/status/1676794861578776577

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19132069

File: 532225c47cabf11⋯.mp4 (15.1 MB,640x360,16:9,Immigration_Minister_addre….mp4)

File: d4f330a6c8dc0d7⋯.jpg (412.57 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Home_Affairs_Minister_Clar….jpg)

File: aac020013902847⋯.jpg (378 KB,825x1537,825:1537,JP_3.jpg)

>>19132052

Clare O’Neil calls Donald Trump Jr a ‘big baby’ in deleted tweets

Matthew Knott - July 6, 2023

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil has been accused of childishness for calling Donald Trump’s eldest son a “sore loser” and a “big baby, who isn’t very popular” in a since-deleted series of posts on Twitter.

Donald Trump jr postponed a planned Australian speaking tour on Wednesday after event organisers claimed delays in the processing of his visa application had made the trip untenable at this time.

Government sources said Trump Jr was granted a visa on Wednesday morning and there was no immigration impediment to him travelling to Australia.

In two tweets sent on Thursday morning, O’Neil said: “Geez, Donald Trump Jr is a bit of a sore loser.

“His dad lost an election fair and square – but he says it was stolen.

“Now he’s trying to blame the Australian government for his poor ticket sales and cancelled tour.”

O’Neil, who has cabinet responsibility for immigration, continued: “Donald Trump Jr has been given a visa to come to Australia.

“He didn’t get cancelled.

“He’s just a big baby, who isn’t very popular.”

She later deleted the tweets.

Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson reposted the deleted tweets and said: “It’s good to see these childish tweets have now been deleted.

“The minister should leave the woke tweets to Labor backbenchers and get back to focusing on the serious national security challenges facing Australia.”

Donald Trump, who served as US president from 2017 to 2021, is the frontrunner for the Republican Party’s 2024 presidential nomination.

Paterson said it was possible Trump could be elected president again in less than 18 months.

“If that happens, I hope for the sake of the AUKUS agreement that cabinet ministers in national security portfolios are able to restrain themselves from juvenile tweets like these,” he said.

Earlier in the day Immigration Minister Andrew Giles said Trump Jr’s visa application was “treated in the same manner as anyone else and dealt within the same processing system” and said there were “no delays” in the processing.

“Any issue that Mr Trump has, or his promoters have that go to the postponement of the tour is a matter entirely for them,” he said.

“It may of course be that the reason for the postponement goes to the lack of enthusiasm for ticket sales, rather than any of the issues that have been raised today.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Trump Jr’s visa was handled in the “normal way”.

“Like anyone else, he was entitled to come here,” he told reporters at a press conference in Newcastle.

“The deferral of his travel is a matter for him.”

In a statement posted on Facebook with the hashtag #cancelculture, event organiser Turning Point Australia promised there would only be a “short delay” for Trump Jr’s tour, which was originally scheduled for July 9 to 11.

“It seems America isn’t the only country that makes it difficult for the Trumps,” the group said.

“Announcement & more info coming soon about the postponement of the tour.”

Asked about O’Neil’s tweets a spokesperson for the conservative group said: “Turning Point Australia is not going to dignify the minister’s tweets with a comment. Suffice to say she is entitled to her opinion and freedom of speech no matter how idiotic.”

The spokeswoman added that poor ticket sales were not the reason for the postponement, saying: “The postponement was purely based on the risk imposed by the absence of his visa at a critical juncture of the tour’s programme.”

In the lead-up to the tour, Trump Jr, a favourite of pro-Trump conservative activists, said it was clear “the same disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture that’s crippled the US has clearly taken hold” in Australia.

“It is the biggest existential threat we face in the West and is literally the decay of Western society,” he said.

Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek last year apologised to Opposition Leader Peter Dutton for likening him to the Harry Potter villain Lord Voldemort, a jibe Albanese criticised as a mistake.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/clare-o-neil-calls-donald-trump-jr-a-big-baby-in-deleted-tweets-20230706-p5dm8s.html

https://twitter.com/SenPaterson/status/1676792534671163392

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19132076

File: 58013884c8c9cb9⋯.jpg (351.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Supporters_of_the_upcoming….jpg)

File: f54610802aeb7ab⋯.jpg (262.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Early_referendum_voting_at….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Why it’s all uphill for the Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament

GEORGE WILLIAMS - JULY 6, 2023

Constitutional change is not for the faint-hearted. The framers of our Constitution set the bar for success deliberately high. Reform requires a popular vote rather than mere parliamentary approval, as well as a double majority. A proposal must be supported by a majority of Australians and in a majority of states.

People tend to focus on national poll results in the lead-up to a referendum, but the state vote often has proved decisive.

The drafters of the Constitution wanted the mechanism for change to reflect the document’s democratic and federal characters. The democratic element is embodied in the requirement for a national majority of all Australians, and the federal element in the need for a majority of states. The latter protects the interests of the smaller states. Any three states, irrespective of their population, can band together to block reform.

The 1977 referendum demonstrates the importance of the state vote. Australians voted overwhelmingly to mandate simultaneous elections for both houses of the federal parliament. However, the national Yes vote of 62.2 per cent failed to produce a successful referendum because Tasmania, Queensland and Western Australia voted No. If just 9211 votes had gone the other way in WA, the proposal would have succeeded. The referendum is a salutary warning to Yes campaigners not to neglect the smaller states.

This result exposes a key challenge for the Yes case and demonstrates why campaigning in referendums is an uneven playing field. The Yes case must use its resources to win the national vote across the nation and at least four out of six states. On the other hand, the No case can concentrate its resources in just three states because winning those states will defeat the referendum.

The referendum record demonstrates the effectiveness of the No case adopting this strategy. Not only have 36 out of 44 referendum proposals been defeated but the most common result (occurring 13 times) has been a deadlock with three states voting in favour and the people of the other three states voting against.

On five of these deadlocked occasions, there was a national Yes vote overall; on several others the national vote was just below 50 per cent. Polling on the Indigenous voice demonstrates the Yes case faces a major challenge in winning the national vote but an even larger challenge in winning four states. The most recent Newspoll shows a national Yes vote of 43 per cent, a No vote of 47 per cent and 10 per cent undecided. State polling shows Yes: No votes of 40:54 in Queensland, 39:52 in WA, 45:46 in South Australia and 43:48 in Tasmania. It will be tempting for the No case to focus its energy and resources on Queensland, WA and Tasmania, knowing that victory in these states will defeat the referendum irrespective of support in NSW and Victoria.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19132083

File: 1361436f43688c1⋯.jpg (123.16 KB,768x1024,3:4,Linda_Burney.jpg)

>>19132076

2/2

Polling in the lead-up to this year’s referendum mirrors past votes, despite no referendum being held for nearly a quarter of a century. In the eight referendum proposals put to the people since 1977, the big states (NSW and, to a lesser extent, Victoria) have more readily supported constitutional change, while the smaller states have opposed it.

Tasmania has been most reluctant to embrace change, voting Yes just 10 times out of 44 referendums since 1901. This may reflect an inherent constitutional conservatism or a view that proposals emanating from “Canberra” must be contrary to the interests of Australia’s smallest state.

Tasmania also has been the nation’s bellwether state in most often voting in a way that reflects the outcome of the referendum. Only in votes held in 1910 and 1951 did the Tasmanian vote not match the final outcome. Other smaller states have been similarly reluctant to support referendums in past decades. WA, Queensland and SA have joined Tasmania in rejecting every one of the eight referendum proposals put to the people since 1977.

Six of these proposals were put in 1984 and 1988 by the Hawke Labor government, and two on a republic and a new preamble to the Constitution were put by the Howard Coalition government in 1999. These final two proposals were championed by Labor, with the Coalition obligated due to an election promise to put a vote on the republic to the people.

We can expect very different campaigns by the Yes and No cases in the lead-up to this year’s referendum. This will reflect the different tasks set for each side to emerge victorious. Referendums are designed to be difficult, with the Yes case needing a national majority and four states and the No case only three states. This strongly favours the No case, demonstrating how the proponents of the voice have a formidable challenge ahead.

George Williams is a deputy vice-chancellor and professor of law at the University of NSW.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/why-its-all-uphill-for-the-yes-campaign-for-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/b13bb1f521ca4b42381cda25afca1e83

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19132091

File: 17ad9a01982cb2c⋯.jpg (329.63 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Liberal_senator_Linda_Reyn….jpg)

>>18954987

>>19120643

‘I have had enough’: Reynolds sends defamation notice to Higgins over Instagram post

Angus Thompson and Jesinta Burton - July 6, 2023

Liberal senator Linda Reynolds has accused Brittany Higgins of repeatedly defaming her after sending a legal letter to her former staffer over a social media post this week in which Higgins accused Reynolds of using the media to harass her.

On the same day Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, faced defamation action filed by Reynolds in a West Australian court, Higgins tweeted on Thursday that she had received a concerns notice from her former boss – for whom she worked as a ministerial adviser in 2019 – “threatening defamation over an Instagram story”.

Reynolds later said in a statement that her lawyers sent a concerns notice to Higgins the day before in a “private communication, which she has chosen to make public”.

Higgins went public in 2021 with an allegation that she had been raped two years earlier in Reynolds’ parliamentary office by a colleague, Bruce Lehrmann. A trial was aborted in October 2022 due to juror misconduct and a retrial was scrapped in December due to Higgins’ mental health. Lehrmann has always maintained his innocence.

“Ever since Ms Higgins first made her allegations of rape public, I have been the target of unwarranted criticism and abuse,” Reynolds said on Thursday.

“Despite her repeated defamation of my character, until now I have not taken any action against her personally – even though I considered her words to breach our previous settlement agreement.

“Yesterday, Ms Higgins made yet another defamatory post about me. I have had enough. I will not tolerate being defamed by her or anybody.”

Higgins’ Instagram post on Tuesday referred to two news stories featuring Reynolds.

One of the articles referenced was by this masthead and contained allegations by Reynolds that Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus had denied her funding for legal assistance throughout an inquiry into Lehrmann’s abandoned trial for political reasons.

“This is from a current Australian senator who continues to harass me through the media and in the parliament,” Higgins’ post said.

Higgins said during the trial that she felt pressured not to pursue the rape complaint when she raised it in Reynolds’ office, but the former defence industry minister said she encouraged Higgins to go to the police.

On Thursday, Reynolds’ lawyer secured special orders in the WA Supreme Court to serve Sharaz with defamation papers after a six-month bid to track him down.

Reynolds is demanding the former press gallery journalist pay damages, as well as aggravated damages, over five social media posts. She also wants an injunction preventing the material from surfacing again.

The lawsuit originally centred on two “trolling” tweets Reynolds claimed were false and defamatory of her and caused her, her family and staff stress and anguish, but was later amended to include a further three social media posts from other platforms.

Separately on Thursday, Reynolds’ lawyer, Martin Bennett, was granted orders in WA’s Supreme Court to get around rules that require those facing legal action to be served personally unless it proves impracticable.

The court heard Sharaz had been sent a concerns notice and later a writ via three publicly listed emails linked to him. The emails were also forwarded to Higgins’ lawyer, Leon Zwier, who repeatedly stated he did not have instruction to accept service on Sharaz’s behalf.

Bennett said it was clear Sharaz and Higgins were aware the action was on foot, using Higgins’ Instagram story that referenced the stoush as evidence.

Justice Marcus Solomon ruled it impracticable to serve Sharaz physically and ordered he be considered served within 24 hours of a third writ being sent to Sharaz’s two non-work email addresses and Zwier.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/i-have-had-enough-reynolds-sends-defamation-notice-to-higgins-over-instagram-post-20230706-p5dmb1.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19132103

File: 8e302434ec8dca8⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Brittany_Higgins_says_she_….jpg)

File: 9bc39f4f1f3b4a3⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Brittany_Higgins_was_worki….jpg)

File: 5a89adf8b6905be⋯.jpg (2.04 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Brittany_Higgins_and_her_p….jpg)

File: 68d8584c61dec50⋯.jpg (129.92 KB,825x375,11:5,BHiggins_4.jpg)

>>18954987

>>19120643

Brittany Higgins considers 'legal options' after being issued concerns notice from WA senator Linda Reynolds

Rebecca Trigger - 6 July 2023

Former Canberra political staffer Brittany Higgins says WA senator Linda Reynolds is threatening to sue her over an Instagram post.

In a tweet today Ms Higgins said she had receive a "concerns notice" from Ms Reynolds.

"I've just received a concerns notice from @lindareynoldswa threatening defamation over an Instagram story," the tweet reads.

"I'm considering my legal options."

Prominent defamation lawyer Martin Bennett, who acts for Ms Reynolds, confirmed to the ABC the notice had been sent yesterday to Ms Higgins's legal counsel and was related to an Instagram post.

Ms Higgins was working in Ms Reynolds's Canberra ministerial office when she alleges she was raped by a colleague – Bruce Lehrmann.

Subsequent legal proceedings against Mr Lehrmann were abandoned in October and then a planned retrial was dropped by the prosecution.

Mr Lehrmann has always denied the accusations and no findings have been made against him.

Separate action launched against partner

Ms Reynolds has also launched legal action against Ms Higgins's partner David Sharaz over two tweets published last year – one in January and one in December.

A writ was issued by the WA Supreme Court against Mr Sharaz in January this year.

That writ says Ms Reynolds's claim arises from tweets that were authored by the Twitter handle @SharazDavid and were falsely defamatory, which caused Ms Reynolds loss and damage.

The writ states Ms Reynolds will be seeking damages including aggravated damages, an injunction restraining the defendant from publishing the defamatory material and costs.

The WA Supreme Court is set to hear an application in that matter this afternoon.

Ms Reynolds last month issued a statement raising concerns over a settlement payment she says was made to Ms Higgins by the Federal Government in relation to a civil claim made against her and fellow WA senator Michalea Cash.

Ms Reynolds called for this payment to be investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-06/brittany-higgins-legal-options-linda-reynolds/102571390

https://twitter.com/BrittHiggins_/status/1676802243046305797

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138429

File: f7e06134464017d⋯.jpg (112.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Linda_Burney_Minister_for_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Yes camp must explain how an Indigenous voice to parliament will close the gap

ANTHONY DILLON - JULY 7, 2023

1/2

The need to close the gap in health and wellbeing between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians was the centrepiece of Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney’s speech at the National Press Club, in which she spoke about the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament.

But the proposed voice has its own gap: namely, the one between what proponents of the voice claim it will achieve and what it can realistically be expected to achieve.

I believe it will achieve virtually nothing at best. At worst, it will leave many Australians, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous, disappointed and perhaps angry. The Yes camp insists the voice is what’s needed to close the gap in health and wellbeing; yet no clear plan has been offered about how to achieve this.

With no plan, we are expected to swallow the flimsy rhetoric spoken by Burney: “Because a voice will be a mechanism for government and the parliament to listen.” Or consider Anthony Albanese’s words: “When we listen to people who are directly affected, we’ll get better outcomes.” The implication here is that “we” have not been able to listen to Indigenous Australians because they have not had, and still do not have, a voice.

But Indigenous Australians not only have their voices in the same way other Australians do, they have additional dedicated government departments with Indigenous staff going in to speak on their behalf. Not even counting the many Indigenous organisations and the Council of Peaks.

So, if Indigenous Australians have voices, why are they doing poorer on most measures of health and wellbeing? This question is central to the upcoming referendum.

The lack of clear answers as to just why so many Indigenous Australians continue to suffer needlessly plays into the hands of the Yes camp. By its logic, the proposed voice “mechanism” will make a positive difference because currently there is no appropriate platform for Indigenous voices to be heard by government.

Having established that Indigenous Australians are most definitely not without voices, it’s important to explain why the current Indigenous voices have not been influential in improving outcomes for Indigenous Australians.

I believe Indigenous Australians suffer because the current chorus of Indigenous voices too often speak the wrong messages. Many of these messages have been based on and continue to trumpet the erroneous belief that the needs of Indigenous Australians are fundamentally different from those of non-Indigenous Australians.

The differences are assumed to be cultural in nature. This has given rise to an industry of “cultural experts”, people who have built their careers out of exaggerating and fabricating difference. Might such experts sit on the voice advisory committee?

The Yes camp is right when it says change is needed, but the voice is not that change.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138435

File: 0f2f109d7973f14⋯.jpg (146.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

>>19138429

2/2

The proposed solutions to the problems facing too many Indigenous Australians will be effective only when they are premised on the idea that their fundamental needs are the same as those of non-Indigenous Australians.

This represents a seismic shift – or what Burney called a “new perspective” – in how Indigenous affairs are addressed. But, while their fundamental needs are the same as other Australians, the degree to which their needs are met are often very different, for some Indigenous Australians at least; most notably, for those living in remote areas.

We close the gap by creating the necessary conditions that enable people to survive and thrive in modern-day Australia. Specifically, we get Indigenous youth and adults job-ready with employment to go to, get the kids attending good school regularly, and ensure communities have access to modern services.

In many remote areas it is difficult to provide modern services staffed with skilled workers. Often, they need to be imported from hundreds of kilometres away.

This has its own challenges. For example, with schools and health services, staff should be employed in communities for at least three to five years. Any less and it is difficult for community members to develop relationships with them. Of course, employing locals is preferred, but this too is challenging, as it requires long-term investment to ensure they are skilled and job-ready.

So, if it is difficult to bring services to the people, should the people not be relocated to where the services and opportunities are?

This option, while sounding easy, also has its own challenges, as dislocation could be emotionally and spiritually crushing for some who have only ever known life on their homelands.

In short, closing the gap requires government to invest in those remote communities that are economically viable, and provide sensitive exit strategies for those that aren’t.

We don’t need the voice to tell us this, nor do we need to wait for the formation of the voice to make these changes happen. They can happen now. Many Indigenous communities have developed to be economically sustainable and many successful Indigenous people have emerged from them – but not nearly enough.

Clearly, hard work and tough conversations are needed to close the gap. It’s no use offering emotionally appealing solutions, like an Indigenous voice to parliament, where crucial details are not known. The true solutions may not be easy, but they are clear and achievable.

Anthony Dillon is a researcher, academic and prominent Aboriginal affairs commentator.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/yes-camp-must-explain-how-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-will-close-the-gap/news-story/79b1ae4fffe38107fecf59445ddca9d2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138494

File: 45f451e85d54863⋯.jpg (2.96 MB,5102x3401,5102:3401,The_ad_which_depicted_Yes_….jpg)

File: 9dd66e97b3922eb⋯.jpg (234.04 KB,1516x2048,379:512,F0UV3D_agAQK0j1.jpg)

>>18928670

>>19037314

Nine apologises for running Voice No campaign ad criticised as ‘racist’

Lisa Visentin - July 6, 2023

1/2

Nine has apologised for running a Voice No campaign ad in The Australian Financial Review newspaper that has been heavily criticised as racist for its cartoon portrayal of Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo, who appeared to be dancing for money.

The ad by conservative lobby group Advance Australia, which ran across a full page in the newspaper on Thursday, depicted Mayo reaching for a wad of cash from Wesfarmers chairman Michael Chaney in a cartoon that ridicules the financial support that big corporates have given the Yes campaign.

A spokesman for Nine, which owns the paper and this masthead, said it regretted running the ad.

“The political advertisement about the Voice referendum placed into today’s Financial Review should not have run, and we apologise for that. We want to encourage a mature debate from both sides and avoid personal and/or inappropriate attacks,” the spokesman said.

The criticism of the ad comes a day after Labor and the Coalition traded barbs over the language and tactics used to prosecute the Indigenous Voice debate.

NSW state Liberal MP Matt Kean, who supports the Voice, condemned the ad as having “no place in Australian politics”, alleging it used a “racist trope” to depict Mayo.

“It’s a throwback to the Jim Crow era of the Deep South. The No Campaign has every right to be heard but can do much better than this,” Kean tweeted.

Independent federal MP Kate Chaney, who is depicted wearing a teal dress and perching on the lap of her father as he offers the money to Mayo, said the No campaign was “stooping to personal and racist attacks”. Wesfarmers has donated $2 million to the Yes23 campaign and both Chaney and her father have been vocal supporters of the Voice.

“Ultimately, I think people will vote in the referendum based on what is fair and useful, not based on fear and hate,” Chaney said.

A number of federal MPs also weighed in on Twitter, expressing their disgust, including Liberal backbencher Bridget Archer, Labor MP Alicia Payne, and teal independent MPs Monique Ryan and Sophie Scamps. The ad was also criticised as being sexist.

Responding to the backlash, an Advance Australia spokesman said: “Matt Kean can keep his elitist Sydney views to himself.”

“There it is again, the Yes campaign elites playing the race card straight off the top of the deck,” the spokesman said.

Yes23, where Mayo is a director, has been contacted for comment. Wesfarmers declined to comment.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did not weigh in directly when asked about the ad in a press conference on Thursday, limiting his comments to “we’ll continue to be positive” and outlining the support for the Voice across business groups, faith communities and sporting codes.

Coalition frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who is leading the anti-Voice vehicle Fair Australia, which is tied to Advance Australia, has been contacted for comment about whether she supports the ad, as has Opposition Leader Peter Dutton.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138497

File: 8dbfbf5190ff6c8⋯.jpg (652.73 KB,825x1428,275:476,MK_1.jpg)

>>19138494

2/2

The furore comes amid another messy week in the Voice debate.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney on Wednesday accused Opposition Leader Peter Dutton of being a “bully boy” for attacking Wesfarmers and other corporates over their support for the Voice, and Fair Australia of using “Trump-style politics” to sow division around the referendum. Price later accused Burney of using bullying tactics herself to ostracise No voters.

In a separate development on Thursday, independent Victorian senator Lidia Thorpe claimed she had been excluded by the Coalition from contributing to the No case in the official Voice referendum pamphlet, and will instead issue her own statement to voters outlining why “the Voice is not a step in the right direction”.

Thorpe, who is leading a radical anti-Voice campaign, said the Coalition had made it clear to her office that her input would be considered only if it aligned with its priorities.

“I’ve been excluded from the writing of the No pamphlet as there are no processes in place to provide a fair discussion of what should be in it or to ensure that my analysis of the Voice will be shared with the Australian people,” Thorpe said in a statement on Thursday.

“I will be putting out a statement on the Voice with a focus on providing information to those voting on the referendum that is factual, explains how the Voice is just another advisory body that can be ignored by government and was not informed by self-determination. The Voice is not a step in the right direction.”

Thorpe’s so-called “progressive No” campaign argues the Voice should be opposed because it is powerless and constitutional recognition undermines Indigenous sovereignty.

Earlier this week, this masthead revealed that Price had met with One Nation leader Pauline Hanson to discuss her potential contribution to the pamphlet.

Price, who is steering the Coalition committee working on the pamphlet, did not respond directly to Thorpe’s claims, but said it “will consider the views of many people” who opposed the Voice.

Under the referendum rules, the Australian Electoral Commission is required to distribute a Yes/No pamphlet to every Australian household at least 14 days before the vote. There is no legal requirement for the pamphlet to be truthful or accurate.

The written Yes and No cases are formulated by the majority of politicians who voted Yes or No to the referendum bill in the parliament, meaning the government will control the Yes case and the Coalition will control the No case.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/nine-apologises-for-running-racist-ad-20230706-p5dm89.html

https://twitter.com/Matt_KeanMP/status/1676759703601451013

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138541

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18928670

>>19075409

Voice to Parliament 'damaging in the long term', former prime minister Tony Abbott says

Sarah Ferguson and Marina Freri - 8 July 2023

1/2

Former prime minister Tony Abbott says a constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament is "wrong in principle" and will reinforce "separatism" in Australia.

Mr Abbott is an advisory board member of the lobby group Advance Australia, which is supporting the No campaign in the upcoming referendum on creating a Voice to Parliament.

He supports constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians but is a fierce opponent of the Voice.

"If this Voice gets up, I think it will be very damaging in the long term," he told 7.30.

"It will entrench race into the constitution."

Australia's constitution already contains references to race under Section 51 xxvi, which enables parliament to make laws for "the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws".

Abbott says Voice would slow government down

The former prime minister claims "separatism" is at the heart of Indigenous disadvantage and the Voice would be "doubling down on failure".

He also argued the proposal would make government harder and would pave the way for challenges in the High Court.

The wording of the referendum question states the Voice to Parliament "may make representation" to the executive government.

"And if the government or the agency to which the representations are made does not respond effectively it could all quite easily end up in the High Court," Mr Abbott said.

The question has been debated by some of the country's most eminent constitutional experts.

The former prime minister says the definition implies a duty on the government to take those representations seriously: "And that's why I think it's not at all unreasonable to expect that the High Court will insist upon very careful consideration by government of anything the Voice says."

Mr Abbott also said the Voice risked becoming "almost like a separate Indigenous parliament … we do not need in our system at this time a separate chamber".

Former PM questions special treatment

Mr Abbott also questioned why the government would single out First Nations Australians for a dedicated representative body. He said other groups within Australia's society were experiencing disadvantage but were not offered the same opportunity.

"I don't see why any particular group of Australians, however much they might be respected, should have their own special Voice to the government into the parliament over and above the voice that every other Australian gets."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138559

File: 0fa0d36e9f04ec5⋯.jpg (667.84 KB,4512x3008,3:2,Former_prime_minister_Tony….jpg)

File: 518c392930ec703⋯.jpg (670.92 KB,2400x1600,3:2,Tony_Abbott_says_the_Voice….jpg)

>>19138541

2/2

The former prime minister said there had been no shortage of policies and funding dedicated to advancing living standards for Indigenous Australians.

"I don't think that you could say that, in recent times at least, there's been any lack of goodwill, any lack of generosity of spirit, and certainly any lack of generosity of funding, for instance, in remote schools, which is where the educational disadvantage is most acute," he said.

Mr Abbott also emphasised the need for society to recognise that not all recent Indigenous history had been marked by failure.

"And if it were an entirely dark story, you wouldn't have wonderful Australians and proud Indigenous people like Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine saying we should vote No," he said.

'I wouldn't have done it', Abbott says of controversial ad

Mr Abbott's interview with 7.30 came on the day the No side was criticised for publishing an advertisement in the Australian Financial Review. It was deemed by some, including former NSW treasurer Matt Kean, as racist.

In a statement to 7.30, Advance Australia defended the advertisement: "We utterly reject the premise that this cartoon is racist. It is a parody of the close relationship between Teal politicians, do-gooder corporate elites and the radical activists of the Yes campaign, such as Thomas Mayo."

Mr Abbott said the Australian Financial Review "must have thought it was alright" but "if it were me, I wouldn't have done it".

The Nine newspaper group has since apologised for publishing the advertisement.

Former PM warns of lose-lose outcome

The federal government maintains the success of the upcoming referendum would be a unifying moment for all Australians.

But Mr Abbott sees it as divisive: "If this Voice gets up, I think it will be very damaging in the long term and wrong in principle. If it goes down, there will be a lot of very disappointed people. And some people will feel perhaps embittered. And that's no good thing either."

Regardless of the outcome of the vote, the former prime minister, who during his tenure often travelled to remote Indigenous communities, said he would always support Indigenous recognition.

"I certainly will continue to support Indigenous recognition, and if people feel on the defeat of the Voice that there is an ongoing need for proper Indigenous recognition in the constitution, well, I'm their man."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-06/tony-abbott-says-voice-to-parliament-damaging-long-term-730/102572800

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUaa0ZyJY7E

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138604

File: 0b4a063a0b650aa⋯.jpg (127.64 KB,1280x720,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Indigenous voice to parliament: Million calls in No-vote survey

PAIGE TAYLOR - JULY 7, 2023

The campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament made 1.1 million phone calls to households and mobiles on Thursday night using a recorded message by its most high-profile activist Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

Senator Price’s star power is considered Fair Australia’s big asset as it seeks to defeat the voice referendum due to be held between October and December. The No campaign was preparing to make 1.5 million more calls on Friday night using her voice.

Fair Australia has called the phone blitz “the biggest community survey in the nation’s referendum history”. During each call, people are asked a series of questions and invited to respond using their phones.

Fair Australia said it was particularly interested in understanding why soft Yes and No voters, along with undecided voters, might vote No.

Peter Lewis, a director of Yes23 partner Essential Media, said robocalls were an “incredibly cheap but incredibly crude tool”. Essential Media is a communications and research company that publishes the Essential Report.

“So rather than having an ABS-weighted quota like Newspoll and Essential Report, robo is just spray and get about a 1 per cent response rate,” Mr Lewis said.

“What they end up with is a marketing list. They can keep that number and keep the ­responses, which allows them to do targeted marketing.”

Fair Australia does not characterise the calls as polling or ­research. The organisation, which receives donations from Australians who oppose a voice enshrined in the Constitution, says it has a separate and extensive polling and research operation. It considers the publication of Mr Lewis’s remarks as “inaccurate and unfair” given his association with the Yes campaign and because he “is criticising us for not doing something we never said we were going to do”.

The Yes23 campaign was preparing on Friday for another round of community events, though not on the large scale of last weekend, when rallies in every state marked a day of ­action. The past five days marked a new pace for the Yes campaign, coinciding with NAIDOC Week.

The Uluru Dialogue was continuing its work in regional towns and communities, where volunteers have been discussing the voice in CWA halls and public spaces.

This week pro-voice volunteers were in Carpatee Valley near Lithgow, Cooktown, Townsville and Bateman’s Bay. They were due in Innisfail and Dubbo on Saturday.

The No side continues to push for a referendum question that asks simply if the Constitution should be amended to acknowledge the long history of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people before white settlement.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-million-calls-in-novote-survey/news-story/817be66e5f229fce36f9b93665cf1042

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138642

File: 046a69a646ecaea⋯.jpg (2.93 MB,5157x3517,5157:3517,Workers_raise_the_flag_of_….jpg)

File: a6c9430b4fdf9fb⋯.jpg (1.33 MB,3052x2125,3052:2125,Kyah_Simon_of_Australia_in….jpg)

File: 9f6339ddd8cc0ef⋯.jpg (1.14 MB,2261x1590,2261:1590,Australia_s_Lydia_Williams….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Australia, New Zealand cleared to fly Indigenous flags at Women's World Cup

Ian Ransom - July 7, 2023

MELBOURNE, July 7 (Reuters) - Global soccer governing body FIFA has agreed to requests from Australia and New Zealand to display Indigenous flags at the Women's World Cup, the co-hosts said on Friday.

The Australian Aboriginal flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag will be on display at all 35 matches across Australia, with the Maori flag, known as 'Tino Rangatiratanga', to feature at all 29 matches in New Zealand.

"Confirmation by FIFA that all official flags of Australia will be flown during the FIFA Women's World Cup is an important moment for all Australians, particularly First Nations People," Football Australia boss James Johnson said in a statement.

Australia's World Cup squad includes Indigenous Australian players Kyah Simon and goalkeeper Lydia Williams.

"For me, obviously, I'm proud of our culture and our First Nations people in the country," Simon told reporters in Melbourne this week.

"Every major tournament, my family's come along and brought their own Aboriginal flag and for me that's obviously a part of my history and my culture and to see my family in the crowd, obviously holding up the flag as well, is something that's close to home for me.

"I'm hoping that people that come from abroad can see that rich culture that we do have here and also be educated along the way."

The World Cup starts on July 20.

https://www.reuters.com/sports/soccer/australia-nz-cleared-fly-indigenous-flags-womens-world-cup-2023-07-07/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138736

File: d4ba2de2bb1e536⋯.jpg (120.66 KB,1280x720,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_instiga….jpg)

File: cba634da66f21ac⋯.jpg (84.23 KB,768x1024,3:4,Columnist_Peter_FitzSimons.jpg)

File: 2a0521aeb06a972⋯.jpg (89.12 KB,768x1024,3:4,ABC_journalist_Laura_Tingl….jpg)

File: eda3a3fd884b75b⋯.jpg (101.51 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_addresses….jpg)

>>18954987

>>19058136

Peter FitzSimons subpoenaed to produce documents relating to Brittany Higgins book deal

REMY VARGA - JULY 7, 2023

Nine columnist Peter FitzSimons has been subpoenaed to produce documents relating to a book deal he helped secure for former ministerial staffer Brittany Higgins believed to be worth $325,000.

Attempts will also be made to subpoena ABC journalist Laura Tingle and publisher Random House for the production of documents in the defamation action brought by former parliament staffer Bruce Lehrmann against Network 10 and the ABC.

The Federal Court heard on Friday that Parliament House no longer had CCTV footage capturing the evening before Ms Higgins’ alleged Mr Lehrmann raped her in the ministerial office of then cabinet minister Linda Reynolds after a night out drinking with colleagues in the early hours of March 23 in 2019.

Sue Chrysanthou SC, who is acting for The Project host Lisa Wilkinson, questioned whether Ms Higgins’s book deal was relevant, given it was secured after the former staffer went public with allegations of rape in February 2021.

FitzSimons, who is married to Wilkinson, helped Higgins secure the book deal.

“How is it … a book deal has anything … or could possibly have anything to do with [Ms Higgins’] credit,” she said.

Judge Michael Lee said the book deal was sufficiently relevant to the defamation proceedings and allowed the subpoena.

Mr Lehrmann, who has consistently denied the allegations, is suing Network 10 and Wilkinson over an interview with Ms Higgins that aired on The Project in February 2021 detailing allegations of rape but not naming Mr Lehrmann as the alleged attacker.

Mr Lehrmann is also suing the ABC over the broadcast of a ­National Press Club address given by Ms Higgins, and Justice Lee on Friday stood over a subpoena for Tingle, who hosted the club address on February 9 last year, to produce documents.

The press club promoted sales of tickets to the address that ­referred to Ms Higgins’ decision to “publicly allege she was raped by a colleague inside Parliament House”.

Mr Lehrmann has claimed the ABC broadcast the press club event with “an improper motive”, namely to prejudice upcoming criminal proceedings against him, and that the broadcaster’s recklessness was so extreme that it amounted to “wilful blindness and constituted malice”.

Ms Chrysanthou said on Friday that the Department of Parliamentary Services said it had no CCTV to produce in response to a subpoena, something the defamation barrister said was concerning.

“We think there should be some explanation as to why that material hasn’t been produced,” she said.

The high-profile trial against Mr Lehrmann was aborted due to juror misconduct, with ACT ­Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold announcing on December 2 that he would not pursue a second trial, citing concern for Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Mr Lehrmann had pleaded not guilty to charges of rape and recklessness as to whether Ms Higgins had consent, denying any sexual activity had taken place at all.

Last month Mr Lehrmann dropped legal action against News Corp over articles written on news.com.au.

The matter will next appear before the Federal Court on July 17 for a case management ­hearing.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/peter-fitzsimons-subpoenaed-to-produce-documents-relating-to-brittany-higgins-book-deal/news-story/54740bd70be5872f835e6b0e7023509f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138979

File: 8542db01bfbde72⋯.jpg (1.77 MB,5568x3712,3:2,Victorian_Labor_MP_Will_Fo….jpg)

File: 2e6c2028bef5261⋯.jpg (3.08 MB,5204x3469,5204:3469,Liberal_senator_James_Pate….jpg)

Security concerns raised as state MPs plan China junket

Paul Sakkal - July 7, 2023

1/2

Victorian state Labor MPs are planning a ten-day junket in China to learn the country’s culture and gather “three years’ worth of social media content”, prompting national security concerns from experts and the federal Coalition.

The September trip’s itinerary, drafted by Victorian MP Will Fowles and leaked by Labor figures worried about the wisdom of the visit, also advised MPs how to utilise their $10,000 annual taxpayer-funded travel allowance by making bookings before June 30 so next financial year’s allowance remained.

Occurring months after Premier Daniel Andrews faced scrutiny for a trip to China, the jaunt promises MPs “an appreciation of Chinese culture”, “a working understanding of how business in China operates”, and “an understanding of how Chinese government works”.

Backbench MPs could also take photographs of landmarks to use for “years’ worth of social media content!” the document states.

Fowles represents Ringwood, a seat in Melbourne’s eastern suburbs, dominated by people of Chinese ancestry, and where Labor has targeted Chinese-Australian voters since the 2018 election and become electorally dominant at both federal and state levels. His trip was initially aimed at eastern suburbs MPs with large proportions of Chinese-Australian voters, according to sources not authorised to speak publicly.

Details of the junket, which will take MPs through Beijing, Xi’An, Shanghai and Guangzhou, emerged as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is being urged by some voices to cancel his scheduled visit to China unless the strategic rival removed bounties on Australia-based Hong Kong activists.

Fowles, a second-term MP, said he was organising a study tour and was “continuing to work through the details with the Commonwealth and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.” He did not answer questions about how he would handle security sensitivities.

“This is not a government trip,” he said.

A DFAT spokeswoman said the department was “aware” of the trip but did not answer whether it supported the trip or had any national security concerns.

A spokeswoman for Premier Daniel Andrews did not answer whether the government supported the trip and said he had “no role in approving parliamentary travel for members of parliament”.

James Paterson, the acting federal opposition spokesman for foreign affairs and a critic of the Chinese government, said the trip should be cancelled if it was not endorsed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong and supported by the Australian Embassy in Beijing because “this is a far too sensitive and complex relationship to be treated like a taxpayer-funded holiday”.

“MPs travelling overseas should be briefed on the personal security risks they will be exposed to, the cybersecurity mitigations they must adopt, the geopolitical sensitivities of their destination and the affiliations and motivations of people they will be meeting with,” Paterson said.

“It is not a country to visit without very careful planning and advice from experts. It’s certainly not an appropriate destination for an amateur political junket from a wannabe tour leader and a few mates to boost their social media content library.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19138991

File: 02b318787d89ab9⋯.jpg (3.9 MB,6818x5464,3409:2732,Penny_Wong_with_her_Chines….jpg)

File: f29e31f413897ef⋯.jpg (640.24 KB,2304x2304,1:1,Michael_Shoebridge_said_th….jpg)

>>19138979

2/2

Countering Paterson’s view, James Laurenceson of the Australia-China Relations Institute said the federal government encouraged bilateral visits when Wong in December became the first Australian minister to visit China in three years.

“This is all a part of re-establishing normal routine connections.This trip may seem abnormal because we haven’t done them with border closures, but there’s nothing particularly remarkable about this,” he said, adding that visitors needed to be wary of their hosts’ motivations.

Two eminent experts disagreed with Laurenceson, including Strategic Analysis Australia’s Michael Shoebridge who said the trip would be taken seriously by Chinese agencies because they wanted to build Chinese influence at all levels of government.

“This kind of group will be used by Chinese agencies to identify who is most likely to be a productive pro-Beijing voice that can be cultivated and enabled in their political futures. They might be backbenchers now, but they can play a role in ‘telling China’s story well’, to quote [President] Xi [Jinping],” he said.

Shoebridge, a former senior Defence Department official, said the trip could “not be all happy cultural visits and watching traditional dancing” because despite the stabilisation of the relationship, there remained deep strategic tension and state MPs would be regarded as representatives of Australia.

“They will be treated with extraordinary respect and hospitality and made to feel very special and important and valued, which is the way intelligence agencies begin to establish rapport with people.”

Swinburne University emeritus professor John Fitzgerald said it was not necessarily a troubling thing if a group of MPs went to China to strengthen the economic relationship.

“If that’s what it is, then I can’t see anybody objecting. But it doesn’t appear to be quite that innocent,” Fitzgerald, a China expert, said. “If it is caught up in electoral politics, then it might be counterproductive.”

He argued politicians who sought to play on sectional attitudes in specific ethnic groups could risk dividing the community and alienating some voters.

“Are there Labor seats placed at risk by this kind of behaviour? Labor needs to keep an eye on this.”

In relation to travel costs, the itinerary states: “The annual international travel allowance is $10,080 (for this FY). This is a use-it-or-lose-it allowance, however, expenses can be incurred in this financial year (FY23) for travel in the next financial year (FY24). Therefore, if flights, transfers and accommodation are booked and paid before June 30, then only meals and incidentals will be drawn from your FY24 budget.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/security-concerns-raised-as-state-mps-plan-china-junket-20230706-p5dm6t.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19139019

File: 668498a04582b86⋯.jpg (200.07 KB,960x1280,3:4,Kevin_Yam_right_and_Ted_Hu….jpg)

File: 198d8043cc8f55d⋯.jpg (816.41 KB,2048x2048,1:1,Victorian_Premier_Daniel_A….jpg)

>>19120607

>>19138979

Hong Kong dissident and Labor member wants MPs’ China trip cancelled

Paul Sakkal - July 7, 2023

An Australian lawyer and Labor Party member with a bounty on his head for criticising the China-led rights crackdown in Hong Kong has urged Andrews government MPs to abandon a planned trip to China, arguing the visit was a “propaganda” tour that insulted his plight.

Kevin Yam, 47, is one of two Australia-based activists accused by Hong Kong police of national security offences, including foreign collusion. Authorities have offered $130,000 for information leading to his arrest and urged Australia to “stop providing a safe haven for fugitives”.

Yam, who is also a rank and file member of the Australian Labor Party, told this masthead he was disappointed to learn of a 10-day September junket being planned by a group of state Labor MPs who intend to learn about Chinese culture and business.

“You’ll never see the real China on these trips,” he said.

“If you’re talking about a cultural exchange – we all know these sorts of trips are not really about that. It’s about China trying to show a positive side of itself to a bunch of unwitting regional-level Australian MPs.

“And why now? Especially given in my case as an ALP member, I have a bounty over me and MPs are going on what they think is a cultural exchange. But really it is a propaganda trip.

“I certainly hope they would reconsider whether this is the right timing for something like this given an Australian citizen and fellow ALP member has got this over his head.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese sounded the alarm on Wednesday about what he called unacceptable bounties and said he would “continue to co-operate with China where we can, but we will disagree where we must”.

Albanese is in talks to travel to China later this year, a trip that Yam endorsed even after the announcement of his bounty, which was strongly condemned by experts and human rights advocates as an extraordinary extraterritorial overreach.

“I was supportive of the idea of Albanese going there because there are genuine issues, such [journalist] Cheng Lei and [writer] Yang Hengjun, or trade or things where we need to talk business,” Yam said, drawing a distinction between Albanese’s trip and that of the Victorian MPs.

“I’m not some sort of extremist who says you should never deal with China. We have an important economic and political economic relationship that we’ve got to handle.”

The planned trip for Victorian MPs, organised by state Labor MP Will Fowles, has been criticised by the federal Coalition which, along with two China experts, raised concerns about potential national security and foreign influence implications.

When asked about the trip this week, Fowles said he was organising a study tour and was “continuing to work through the details with the Commonwealth and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade”. He did not answer questions about how he would handle security sensitivities.

“This is not a government trip,” he said.

Yam is a Melbourne-based lawyer who lived in Hong Kong for 20 years and criticised the recent crackdown on civil society and diminution of judicial independence in Hong Kong, before returning to Australia last year.

He was targeted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning at a press conference in Beijing on Tuesday night, in which she warned Beijing would “brook no meddling by any external forces”.

“Kevin Yam and the others have long been engaging in anti-China activities aimed at destabilising Hong Kong,” she said.

“After fleeing overseas, they have acted in an even more outrageous way to create trouble and continued to instigate the division of the country and subversion of state power, acting as pawns for external anti-China forces in their effort to interfere in Hong Kong affairs.”

The Hong Kong government said in a statement on Thursday that “national security laws have extraterritorial effects” recognised under international law, and criticism of the bounties amounted to “double standards” and “hypocrisy”.

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/federal/hong-kong-dissident-and-labor-member-wants-mps-china-trip-cancelled-20230707-p5dml6.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19139080

File: 63d8c5efd8872b0⋯.jpg (167.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Psychiatrist_Jillian_Spenc….jpg)

>>18992091

Gender-sceptic doctor launches human rights challenge to ‘cheerleading’ trans pronouns policy

NATASHA ROBINSON - JULY 7, 2023

A doctor’s right to object on medical grounds to the unquestioning affirmation of children as the opposite gender faces a human rights test in Queensland, with a suspended psychiatrist filing a complaint against the state’s children’s hospital over transgender health policies.

Jillian Spencer alleges she was prevented from adopting a neutral therapeutic approach and instead forced to comply with gender-­affirming polices that risked causing substantial harm to young ­people, during the course of her employment as a senior staff specialist in the consultation liaison psychiatry team at the Queensland Children’s Hospital.

In a complaint lodged with the Queensland Human Rights ­Commission, Dr Spencer, who is openly critical of gender-affirming policies, reveals that she was subject to lawful employment directions that required her to use gender-­affirming pronouns at all times in her practise of medicine and ­refrain from dissuading any child and their family from seeking a ­referral to the hospital’s children’s gender clinic, which frequently prescribes puberty blockers and cross sex hormones to young teenagers.

“I was concerned about the increasing number of children and adolescents – especially biological females – presenting with gender dysphoria in the context of co­morbid mental health diagnoses and complex psychological issues, including trauma,” Dr Spencer writes in her complaint.

“I became very concerned about the potential harm our hospital was doing in immediately using preferred pronouns, that ­unquestioningly affirms a child’s perceived identity and sets them on a treatment pathway of medical intervention that purports to transition a young person into an identity that they are likely to outgrow if interventions of this kind are not applied.”

Dr Spencer, who was stood down from clinical duties at QCH three months ago following a ­patient complaint, is seeking amendments to health policy ­pursuant to the state’s Anti-­Discrimination Act that “no health worker may be required to use a patient’s preferred pronouns” and that “affirmation of a child’s gender identity cannot be imposed on health professionals”.

She also requests acknowledgment by the QCH that a rejection of the affirmation model of gender dysphoria treatment is a protected political belief and a reasonable professional judgment that is to be respected.

Dr Spencer said the gender-­affirmative pathway adopted by QCH in her professional opinion “seemed inconsistent with best medical practice of taking an evidence-led holistic approach to child and adolescent psychiatry”.

Staff were warned at education sessions there was a “grave risk of patient suicidality” if gender-­affirming interventions were not applied.

Tension within the hospital over transgender healthcare policies boiled over when management hung a large trans pride flag in the youth mental health unit waiting room, which Dr Spencer took down on the basis the area needed to be a neutral space.

Dr Spencer says she took the action some time after becoming extremely disturbed at the ­hospital’s policies when the psychiatry team was given an education session conducted by a nurse from the children’s gender clinic on chest binding for young female patients.

Dr Spencer later began using the pronoun “adult human female” in her email signature in protest at the pronouns and was reprimanded.

A spokesperson for Children’s Health Queensland said the organisation adopted a “universal person-centred care approach”.

“We respect the individual needs and preferences of every child and young person and their right to feel safe and supported while receiving clinical care through our service,” the CHQ statement said.

“This aligns with our responsibility as a Queensland government agency – where everyone employed is bound by public sector workplace policies and a code of conduct.

“Similarly, CHQ is committed to upholding the human rights of all people who connect with, or work within, our services.

“This reflects our obligations under the Human Rights Act 2019 to act and make decisions in a manner which supports and does not limit the human rights of ­patients, families and staff, unless such limitation is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable.”

Dr Spencer’s complaint was lodged with the QHRC late last month but CHQ said it hadn’t yet been notified.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/gendersceptic-doctor-launches-human-rights-challenge-to-cheerleading-pronouns-policy/news-story/284be97af972ecd236f97482bd8b3300

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19139143

File: f2603eaaf4d95fa⋯.jpg (93.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Medical_Affairs_Commit….jpg)

File: 6d901ff349e4b5d⋯.jpg (270.53 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Keira_Bell_speaks_to_repor….jpg)

>>18940103

>>18945832

>>18992091

Endocrinologists’ challenge to the medical transition of gender-questioning children silenced by medical college

NATASHA ROBINSON - JULY 7, 2023

1/2

The medical affairs committee of the nation’s peak endocrinology society opposed the prescription of hormones to children and expressed deep reservations over the lack of evidence underpinning transgender affirmative medicine standards of care adopted by children’s hospitals in explosive advice to a peak medical college.

The Medical Affairs Committee of the Endocrine Society of Australia – a subspecialty college of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians – did not support the endorsement of gender-affirmative standards of care developed by influential doctors at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, pointing to concerns about the lack of evidence behind practices including placing children on puberty blockers at a very young age.

The views of the ESA’s medical affairs committee are contained in a letter to the RACP, which in late 2019 was consulting the profession at the request of then health minister Greg Hunt who had requested advice on the treatment of gender dysphoria in children and adolescents.

The ESA’s letter reporting the position of its medical affairs committee advised that, after examining RCH policy documents, the specialist endocrinologists who made up the committee did not support giving puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones to children and raised concerns that the ­effects of puberty blockers were not reversible.

“ESA does not support formal RACP endorsement of the RCH document at this time,” said the letter, dated November 11, 2019.

“This is a complex area, the evidence base is limited and the RCH document largely reflects the authors’ opinion because, as the authors themselves state, ‘the published evidence on the topic prohibited the assessment of level (and quality) of evidence for these recommendations’.

“Secondly, there are sufficient concerns expressed in the correspondence received by RACP, and by other parties, to warrant further inquiry prior to making a decision on endorsement.”

The ESA called for the establishment of a formal working group independent of RCH doctors to review the issues.

The ESA now says the letter does not reflect the current position of the society, and that it supports gender-affirming care in line with World Professional Association for Transgender Health Standards of Care and Australian guidelines, “in keeping with the latest research evidence”.

In March 2020, the RACP wrote to Mr Hunt rejecting the need for a national review into gender-affirming medicine and saying that to withhold care from children and adolescents would be unethical. The calls for a review had been prompted by calls for a Cass-style inquiry following concerns in the UK over children being rushed onto puberty blockers, medically transitioned and later feeling regret. Those concerns were highlighted by the case of detransitioner Keira Bell.

The UK inquiry led to a decision to close the Tavistock gender clinic and changes to the treatment model, urging a more holistic approach instead of offering children only puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

The RACP in its advice to Mr Hunt acknowledged the lack of evidence base concerning gender-affirming care but said scientific evidence might take a long time to be produced. The RACP noted that the ESA had been consulted but gave no indication of the divergence of medical views on the issue before endorsing the RCH-developed guidelines and rejecting the need for a national inquiry.

“The RACP supports the principles underlying (the RCH) guidelines, specifically the emphasis on a multidisciplinary appr­oach to providing person-centred care which prioritises the best interests, preferences and goals of the patient,” the RACP said.

It is understood the consultations leading up to the drafting of the advice were highly charged, with some committee meetings descending into screaming matches between experts amid ­accusations the RCH-dominated pediatricians faction was made up of activist doctors.

The RCH declined to comment on the issue when asked.

Such a concern was reflected in the view of an external adviser to the medical affairs committee, who reported that “the RCH approach claims to set Australian standards, but the document represents solely the attitudes of one group of advocates”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19139154

File: 077027f232060f5⋯.jpg (242.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Westmead_Children_s_Hospit….jpg)

>>19139143

2/2

The RCH developed guidelines several years ago in gender-affirming medicine for children adolescents. These guidelines became known as the Australian standards of care and treatment guidelines for transgender and gender diverse children and adolescents and were adopted by children’s hospitals around the country after RCH paediatrician Michelle Telfer published an article in the Medical Journal of Australia claiming “clinician consensus” on an affirmative approach that included prescribing puberty blockers at Tanner Stage 2, which is upon the first signs of puberty.

The RCH website currently states “as (puberty blockers) are reversible in their effects, should an adolescent wish to stop taking them at any time, their biological puberty will resume”.

The ESA raised concerns about such use of powerful hormone medications. “There are gaps in the evidence that the RCH document does not adequately address, one instance being the statement that GnRH analogs to block puberty progression are reversible,” it said.

“The evidence in children for that statement is limited: one review is cited of long-term follow-up of children treated with GnRH analogs for central precocious puberty. For boys, that summarises the only four very small, disparate and inconclusive studies available, two of which describe no long-term follow-up and none showed any meaningful evidence of ‘full reversibility’.”

The external reviewer also challenged the RCH argument that parents who did not want treatment imposed on their children were raising their child’s risk of suicide.

“RCH advocacy for an affirmative model is, in effect, accepting a child’s wishes as unassailable and implies that any parental reluctance to accept the diagnosis of gender dysphoria and its treatment is ill-informed resistance to be overcome by goal-oriented ‘counselling’,” the reviewer said.

“The RCH argument that non-treatment in the face of gender dysphoria is not neutral, uses an exaggerated risk of suicidality to make this unbalanced argument seem necessary.”

There were also concerns expressed by the reviewer that many children being gender transitioned may not have diagnosable gender dysphoria.“The RCH document does not address the real problem of differentiating genuine gender dysphoria (with early onset of unshakeable belief that the person was born and raised into the wrong sex) from others who are gender confused children or adolescents who consider themselves “non-binary”, “gender-fluid”, “agender”, “third gender”, etc” the reviewer quoted in the ESA letter said.

Paul Komesaroff, a Monash University professor of medicine, specialist endocrinologist and the Director of the Centre for Ethics in Medicine and Society, said the 2019 ESA letter reflected a level of uncertainty surrounding hormone treatments remained a live issue.

“Such features may connote youthful, yet to mature understanding of sex and gender. One view is that the latter should not be treated with puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones at least until adulthood and then only on the advice of an experienced psychiatrist and/or psychologist as part of a transgender medicine multidisciplinary team.”

“Many questions relating to gender-affirmative medicine remain unresolved at the present time, largely reflecting a lack of conclusive evidence,” Professor Komesaroff said.

“As a result, there is a range of views about some aspects of treatment, including especially the use of puberty blocking drugs in young people. This diversity of views has been expressed by physicians from different specialty perspectives for some years, leading many to express caution about clinical guidelines that are strongly directive and to favour ongoing processes of review and reassessment.

“Many endocrinologists support the establishment of a formal working group of physicians with relevant clinical expertise to review the issues and provide summaries and advice to help guide public policy.”

ESA president Ann McCormack issued a statement saying it supported gender-affirming care in keeping with the latest research evidence.

The RACP said in a statement that in late 2019 and early 2020 it “conducted a broad-ranging and confidential consultation process where a diverse range of advice was considered”.

“The RACP’s advice has always been that the federal government should develop a nationally consistent framework, through an evidence-based process, that is removed from public debate which harms children,” a spokesperson said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/endocrinologists-challenge-to-the-medical-transition-of-genderquestioning-children-silenced-by-medical-college/news-story/27d8b2cb34c2b82ca67d5b2ec4ea4c22

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19139214

File: 1139a91a1811cb6⋯.jpg (278.53 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Home_Affairs_Minister_Clar….jpg)

File: 14d115d1278e671⋯.jpg (197.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Donald_Trump_Jr.jpg)

File: fac5dbe982cd8e2⋯.jpg (359.36 KB,825x1176,275:392,SM_1.jpg)

File: 64944f39be7a7c4⋯.jpg (218.85 KB,1241x1304,1241:1304,F0Ur5CWaIAE15no.jpg)

>>19132052

Slapdown for ‘big baby’ Donald Trump Jr tweet by Clare O’Neil

JESS MALCOLM - JULY 7, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese’s office has stepped in and directed a senior cabinet minister to delete a tweet attacking Donald Trump and his son, with foreign policy experts describing the incident as a diplomatic “own goal”.

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil accused Donald Trump Jr of attempting to blame the Albanese government for delays in his Australia tour, calling him a “sore loser” and a “big baby”.

She also attacked the former US president over his election fraud claims, saying he “lost an election fair and square”.

The Australian understands Ms O’Neil deleted the tweets at the direction of the Prime Minister’s office.

Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge said Ms O’Neil’s comments were “an unnecessary own goal” that lacked foresight given Mr Trump may be the Republican nominee for the White House at next year’s election. Mr Shoebridge said the election of Mr Trump for a second term was “absolutely a credible scenario”.

“My view is that it would not be wise to turn an issue into a personal issue about somebody,” Mr Shoebridge said.

“The right focus for a minister is policy and substance, and personalising issues is normally not productive, and people remember personal things more than they do big policy things.

“We saw with the previous administration there were a lot of people who discounted Trump winning an election as a possibility and found themselves doing a lot of hard work trying to build that relationship.”

Ms O’Neil’s attack came after Mr Trump Jr delayed his planned visit to Australia for promotional tours in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.

Tour organiser Turning Point Australia says his visa was granted only 24 hours before he was to leave for Sydney, claiming the process was deliberately delayed by the government.

But Ms O’Neil said his visa was treated the same as that of any other visitor. She claimed the real reason Mr Trump Jr cancelled was because of poor ticket sales.

“Geez Donald Trump Jr is a bit of a sore loser. His dad lost an election fair and square – but he says it was stolen,” she tweeted.

“Now he’s trying to blame the Australian government for his poor ticket sales and cancelled tour.

“Donald Trump Jr has been given a visa to come to Australia. He didn’t get cancelled. He’s just a big baby, who isn’t very popular.”

Former UKIP leader and enthusiastic Trump supporter Nigel Farage refuted Ms O’Neil’s claims that Mr Tump Jr’s tour had been postponed due to poor ticket sales, and insisted: “We’ll be back.”

“Donald Trump Jr had attracted huge interested and 8,000 tickets had already been sold,” Mr Farage said in a statement. “Many are saying that the late visa is a form of cancel culture,” he added.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19139218

File: 20692d10338e4b2⋯.jpg (340.67 KB,825x1319,825:1319,NF_1.jpg)

File: fc9019a5a32325e⋯.jpg (168.03 KB,1264x1615,1264:1615,F0XUK64WIAIFgsG.jpg)

>>19139214

2/2

A key partner for the event, Conservative Political Action Conference, also disputed the claim of poor ticket sales.

CPAC director Andrew Cooper claimed the organisers had had no problems selling tickets and had been forced to make a last-minute call to delay the tour as Mr Trump Jr did not have a visa on Wednesday.

“No, there were no problems selling tickets at all. It was postponed because he didn’t have a visa, it was four days out from the show and there was no visa so we had to make a call,” Mr Cooper said.

“It had sold plenty of tickets, we are bitterly disappointed. It will go ahead and will be sold out when it does.”

Mr Albanese on Thursday shrugged off suggestions Mr Trump Jr’s visa controversy could impact Australia’s relationship with the US if his father was returned to the White House.

The Prime Minister said Mr Trump Jr’s visa was dealt with “in the normal way” and that the deferral of his travel was a matter for him.

“I‘ll tell you the elections that I’m focused on – I’m focused on an election that I’ll be involved in some time in 2025,” Mr Albanese said. “But what I’m really focused on is just governing in an orderly, good way. Delivering on the commitments that we’ve made, providing Australia with good government.”

Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said Ms O’Neil’s comments were “juvenile” and “childish”.

Senator Paterson said Ms O’Neil should “leave the woke tweets to Labor backbenchers and get back to focusing on the national security challenges facing Australia”.

“Like it or not, Trump could be elected president again in less than 18 months. If that happens, I hope for the sake of the AUKUS agreement that cabinet ministers in national security portfolios are able to restrain themselves from juvenile tweets like these,” Senator Paterson said.

Foreign policy expert Peter Jennings said the attacks from both Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney – who this week criticised the voice No campaign of “importing American-style Trump politics – and Ms O’Neil undermined Mr Albanese’s election promise to govern differently.

He said Mr Trump remained a hugely influential figure in the Republican Party and that Australians expected more from government ministers.

“I think it fails the test of stability, not even a ministerial standard but a human standard,” Mr Jennings said. “Our government should be careful not to build a legacy of casual abuse for the person who could become the president of the US.

“A year ago Anthony Albanese said he was going to do things differently, like be transparent and consultative and all of the things that he has turned out not to be, and now has become casually rude, and I don’t think it’s acceptable for any politician.

“O’Neil goes after Trump because he is an easy figure for the centre-left to attack but they (the US) are our closest international partner and we should expect better behaviour from our senior ministers.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/slapdown-for-big-baby-donald-trump-jr-tweet-by-clare-oneil/news-story/843bb08ab20a2f222875f79b9f155aba

https://twitter.com/sharrimarkson/status/1676794861578776577

https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1676979725401567238

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19139383

File: 76ff23c9404336c⋯.jpg (56.68 KB,634x439,634:439,Trump_Jr_at_a_speaking_eve….jpg)

File: b7444b96c63e8e6⋯.jpg (47.61 KB,634x423,634:423,He_called_Home_Affairs_Min….jpg)

File: e4a63a03df76e12⋯.jpg (94.95 KB,634x549,634:549,In_an_extraordinary_spray_….jpg)

File: bf7ed88114c6550⋯.jpg (349.7 KB,481x970,481:970,Donald_Trump_Jr_slaps_down….jpg)

>>19132052

EXCLUSIVE: Donald Trump Jr accuses Labor of 'lying' about why he cancelled his tour - and suggests a sinister reason for delaying his visa: 'They want to shut down conservative voices'

BRITTANY CHAIN - 7 July 2023

1/2

Donald Trump Junior has hit back at 'lies' from the Government about why he postponed his tour at the last minute - and suggested Labor delayed approving his visa because they want to shut down conservative voices.

Trump Jr. confirmed he'd already sold 8,000 tickets to his speaking tour before it was cancelled at the last minute - and called Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil a 'coward' after she risked escalating the matter into a full-blown diplomatic crisis between the U.S. and Australia after posting a series of juvenile Tweets.

The Prime Minister's Office ordered O'Neil to delete a series of Tweets in which she called Trump Jr. a 'sore loser and a big baby' - and claiming the reason he cancelled his tour was because of 'poor ticket sales' rather than visa delays.

Trump Jr. exclusively told Daily Mail Australia her comments were 'ridiculous lies' and perpetuated 'fake news' - as he blamed the Labor Government for his decision to postpone the tour.

'The tyrannical Left doesn't believe people have the right to freedom of expression and will do anything to shutdown conservative voices, but we will not bow down to them,' he said.

'If Minister Clare O'Neil isn't too much of a coward to leave her left wing safe space, I'd be happy to invite her to attend any of the events that we put on.

'You never know, maybe she'll learn a thing or two about the importance of freedom of speech and diversity of thought.'

The controversial speaker and son of former US President Donald Trump vowed to reschedule his tour as soon as possible.

'Despite the ridiculous lies from the fake news, we sold over 8,000 tickets to my free-speech tour in Australia,' he said.

Trump Jr. placed blame for his postponed tour squarely at the feet of government, insisting his visa was not approved in a timely manner.

He was scheduled to appear in Sydney on July 9 for a tour which promised to discuss 'the disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture'.

South Australian Liberal senator Alex Antic was scheduled to join him on tour, along with British Brexit campaigner turned broadcaster, Nigel Farage.

But ticket holders received an email on Wednesday afternoon stating 'unforeseen circumstances' had led to the decision.

Tour operators told Daily Mail Australia it was postponed 'due to the delay in the arrival of a visa to enter Australia'.

'The visa, which has now been issued, was only received late afternoon on Wednesday July 5; only 24 hours before Donald Trump Jr. was set to board a flight to Sydney.'

Ms O'Neil hit back at the criticism in her extraordinary Twitter spray at 11.54am on Thursday, arguing he received all the approvals needed to enter Australia.

'Donald Trump Jr has been given a visa to come to Australia,' she said. 'He didn't get cancelled. He's just a big baby, who isn't very popular.'

She also said Trump Jr was a 'sore loser' whose 'dad lost an election fair and square - but he says it was stolen'.

By 1.23pm, the messages had been deleted.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese publicly refused to be drawn on her comments, but Labor sources told Sky News he was privately 'furious' with her.

He insisted Trump Jr.'s visa application was 'dealt with in the normal way'.

But Immigration Minister Andrew Giles backed Ms O'Neil, reiterating her suggestion the postponement was due to poor ticket sales.

'The visa was dealt with in the normal manner. Any issue that Mr. Trump has or his promoters have that go to the postponement of the tour is a matter entirely for them. It may of course be that the reason for the postponement goes to the lack of enthusiasm for ticket sales, rather than any of the issues that they've raised,' he said.

'Now I'd be really clear about this. I don't share many of Mr Trump's views but that is entirely irrelevant to decision making. He is entitled to express them if he meets the requirements of the Migration Act.'

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19139398

File: 8d093eaff004715⋯.jpg (72.37 KB,634x450,317:225,Trump_Jr_with_his_fiancee_….jpg)

File: 1b9825104cca27c⋯.jpg (103.33 KB,634x953,634:953,Linda_Burney_has_deviated_….jpg)

File: 701831193661d08⋯.jpg (106.32 KB,634x677,634:677,Donald_Trump_Jr.jpg)

>>19139383

2/2

The director of Strategic Analysis Australia Michael Shoebridge told The Australian the comments were 'an unnecessary own goal' for the government, who may well have to work closely with Trump Jr's father if his bid to return to the White House next year is successful.

'We saw with the previous administration there were a lot of people who discounted Trump winning an election as a possibility and found themselves doing a lot of hard work trying to build that relationship,' he said.

In spite of Trump's current legal woes, Mr Shoebridge said the prospect of him returning for a second term as President is 'absolutely a credible scenario'.

Shadow Home Affairs minister James Patterson had similar concerns.

He said the comments could sabotage Australia's relationship with the US if Donald Trump were to be successfully re-elected at the next US Presidential election.

'Like it or not, Trump could be elected president again in less than 18 months,' he said.

'If that happens, I hope for the sake of the AUKUS agreement that cabinet ministers in national security portfolios are able to restrain themselves from juvenile tweets like these.'

The public commentary around Trump Jr from senior Labor MPs marked the second time in as many days the government went on the record to publicly criticise the family.

Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney on Wednesday deviated her prepared remarks of her highly anticipated speech explaining how the Voice to Parliament will work to slam the 'importation of Trump-style politics' to Australia.

A version of the speech was released to media on Tuesday night but did not include any of the criticisms she levelled against the No campaign in the live address.

'The No campaign… is importing Trump style politics to Australia. The aim is to polarise, to sow division in our society by making false claims,' she said.

'Do not let the No campaign get away with using Trump style politics. Do not let them divide us.'

Trump Jr's anticipated tour had stoked plenty of controversy in the weeks before his decision to postpone.

During the speaking tour, he, Mr Farage and Mr Antic had vowed to share their views on the state of affairs across Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom.

They were expected to touch on the AUKUS deal, the war in Ukraine and the sensitive relationship each nation shares with China.

Trump Jr. went backpacking around Australia in college and said he 'loves' the country.

'It's a great country full of great people which is why it's so sad to see what's happening there,' he said.

'After speaking with some of them it's clear the same disease of woke identity politics and cancel culture that's crippled the US has clearly taken hold there.

'It is the biggest existential threat we face in the West and is literally the decay of western society.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12273465/Donald-Trump-Jr-slams-cowardly-Australian-MP-Claire-ONeil-called-big-baby-amid-visa-row.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19143769

File: bf7cd442016211c⋯.jpg (118.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,David_Littleproud_has_clai….jpg)

File: a76b100ab5065f6⋯.jpg (151.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Liberal_leader_Peter_Dutto….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Littleproud claims country ‘never at war’ with Indigenous Australians, rebuffs treaty position

BLAKE ANTROBUS - JULY 8, 2023

David Littleproud has reiterated the National Party’s opposition to the Voice and to a treaty, claiming the country has “never been at war” with Indigenous Australians.

The Nationals leader said his party would “stand convicted” for “standing up for regional Australia” while addressing supporters at the LNP State Conference in Brisbane.

His party has long been opposed to Labor’s proposed Voice to parliament and upcoming referendum.

Mr Littleproud joined Liberal leader Peter Dutton in reiterating this position, with Mr Dutton warning party faithful that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was leading the country on a course to “division” for the October referendum.

The Queensland Liberal-National Party – led by David Crisafulli – voted with the incumbent state Labor government to pass the Path to Treaty legislation.

Speaking to reporters, Mr Littleproud said he did not see a treaty as worthwhile because the party had worked “hand-in-hand” to provide opportunities for Indigenous Australians.

He said Labor had no “ambitious” goal to closing the gap.

“We’re effectively signing into our constitution the perpetuity of failure,” Mr Littleproud said.

“We’ve never been at war with Indigenous Australians.”

Asked about historic conflicts such as the frontier wars - violent wars, conflicts and massacres involving settlers and Indigenous Australians from the 18th century - Mr Littleproud acknowledged “mistakes” had been made.

“There were mistakes in areas across our country, no-one is walking away from the fact they were made by settlers,” he said.

“There was conflict between Indigenous tribes as well … but as a nation we have walked forward.

“When someone loses their life, and it’s perpetrated by somebody, that is a serious crime. But it wasn’t those that settled, the English that came here with the intent of starting a war. That wasn’t what happened.

“There were outbreaks in certain areas, that’s history and that’s part of listening to and understanding our past.

“We should also as a nation put our chin up and our chest out at what we have achieved together.”

In his opening speech, Mr Dutton said of the referendum: “We’re going to face the most significant vote in our nation’s history.”

“This is the most significant change that has been proposed to our constitution in 120 years.

“(We) will ultimately end up with another layer of bureaucracy.”

Mr Littleproud echoed the comments, stating billions were being spent each year trying to address issues being faced by Indigenous Australians.

“I find no circumstances that I can see our party room even accepting a treaty,” Mr Littleproud said.

“We don’t believe a treaty is necessary. We believe our great nation has come together and will continue to come together, if we work together.

“The Nationals will stand convicted – convicted of our beliefs to ensure regional Australia is not only heard but metropolitan Australians seek to understand us.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/littleproud-claims-country-never-at-war-with-indigenous-australians-rebuffs-treaty-position/news-story/b86ad721c5de788a40b12665a6077b49

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19143800

File: ff0dc4da85eda28⋯.jpg (196.15 KB,1870x1110,187:111,Hundreds_caught_up_in_crac….jpg)

Hundreds caught up in crackdown on sex trafficking, organised crime

Marta Pascual Juanola - July 6, 2023

1/2

Officials have stopped almost two dozen women at the border suspected of being sex-trafficked into Australia, amid a crackdown on organised criminal syndicates rorting the visa system to enable human trafficking.

The Australian Border Force is also targeting more than 175 people in Australia and overseas who are suspected of being involved with criminal groups.

Since November last year, border officials have intercepted 22 women suspected of coming to Australia from overseas to work in the sex industry. Intelligence from law enforcement agencies suggests not all were entering Australia against their will.

The women, who travelled from Vietnam, Thailand, Taiwan, Indonesia, China, Japan, Cambodia and South Korea, were refused entry into Australia on the grounds they were non-genuine travellers planning to work in breach of their visa conditions. Most were intercepted in Sydney and Cairns.

Border Force has launched a month-long crackdown on migrant-worker abuses. Officers will visit more than 200 workplaces nationwide across the food, construction, mining and manufacturing industries.

Border Force acting Commander Vaughan Baxter said migrant worker exploitation – which included wage underpayment, pressure to work in breach of visa conditions, excessive hours, visa cancellation threats, and unsafe work conditions – risked damaging Australia’s standing on the world stage.

“Migrant workers play a key role in filling Australia’s labour shortages and supporting a thriving economy. If they are underpaid or exploited it is not only unfair to migrants, but has the potential to damage our international reputation.

“These unscrupulous employers should consider themselves on notice,” Baxter said.

The crackdown will also incorporate Operation Inglenook, a multi-agency taskforce led by Border Force to target individuals suspected of being involved in human trafficking and modern slavery within the sex industry.

The taskforce was launched last November after an investigation by The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, 60 Minutes and Stan’s Revealed documentary program showed how global human-trafficking syndicates were exploiting flaws in Australia’s border security and immigration system to run illegal sex rings.

The exploitation was aided by networks of federal government-licensed migration agents, education colleges and fixers who enabled “visa farms” to be used by crime syndicate bosses to gain repeated entry into Australia for syndicate members and those being exploited as indentured labour.

The Trafficked investigative series exposed how Binjun Xie, a Sydney-based crime boss nicknamed “The Hammer”, was able to enter Australia in 2014 and build a criminal underground sex empire despite having previously been jailed in the UK for running a similar operation.

The investigation prompted Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil to order an urgent independent inquiry into the failings of Australia’s migration system.

The inquiry, conducted by former Victoria Police chief commissioner Christine Nixon, found Border Force had limited legislative powers and resources to investigate visa and migration fraud and the exploitation of temporary migrant workers.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19143808

File: e03cbcf2a0b0353⋯.jpg (1.06 MB,3823x2549,3823:2549,Home_Affairs_Minister_Clar….jpg)

>>19143800

2/2

O’Neil said the work being done by Border Force and other agencies sent a strong signal that exploitation and abuse in Australian workplaces would not be tolerated.

“All migrant workers in our country should be able to rely on the same rights and protections, but unfortunately, we [the Labor government] inherited a migration system which was rife with exploitation of vulnerable migrant workers,” O’Neil said.

Human Rights Law Centre managing lawyer Sanmati Verma said the key to tackling migrant worker exploitation was to rebuild Australia’s migration system from the ground up to protect foreign workers and encourage them to speak out against abuse without risking deportation.

“When you have these operations picking up vulnerable people, there is no visa that they can automatically transition on to that would allow them to seek redress against their employer or participate in investigations against them,” Verma said.

“That means that you are going to have vulnerable people who are liable for deportation from the country, and that is such a fundamental flaw in the way that our system operates.”

The centre is among the groups calling for victims of workplace exploitation to be protected against visa cancellations and for the introduction of temporary visas to allow workers to remain in Australia while seeking redress from their employers.

The federal government has introduced a bill to parliament to amend migration laws to criminalise coercing someone into breaching their visa conditions and to repeal provisions that leave exploited workers who breach their visa conditions facing deportation.

If passed, the legislation would also prohibit employers and other third parties found to have exploited workers from hiring temporary migrants and increase penalties for those caught misusing Australia’s migration programs.

A report by the Grattan Institute released in May found recent migrants to Australia were 40 per cent more likely to be underpaid than long-term residents with the same skills and experience working in the same job.

Data from the Fair Work Ombudsman shows temporary visa holders accounted for 26 per cent of all litigation initiated for breaches to the Fair Work Act in 2021-22, despite making up just 4 per cent of the workforce nationally.

Immigration, Citizenship, and Multicultural Affairs Minister Andrew Giles said the underpayment of migrant workers hurt all Australians by driving wages and work conditions down.

“Work conditions can’t be a race to the bottom. That’s why the government has introduced a bill into parliament to help workers speak up and target employers who do the wrong thing,” he said.

“Regardless of where you’ve come from or your visa status, everyone should be safe at work.”

Migrant worker exploitation can be reported anonymously to the Department of Home Affairs’ Border Watch website.

https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about-us/what-we-do/borderwatch

https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/help-and-support/departmental-forms/online-forms/border-watch

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/hundreds-caught-up-in-crackdown-on-sex-trafficking-organised-crime-20230704-p5dlin.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19143911

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>18960157

>>19082419

The three Australians on track to become the Top Guns of the sea

Farrah Tomazin - July 8, 2023

1/2

South Carolina: In the deep, dark waters of the Pacific Ocean, James Heydon, Adam Klyne, and William Hall could soon be breaking new ground for Australia: spending time at sea as AUKUS-ready nuclear submarine operators.

The trio today became the first group of Royal Australian Navy personnel to graduate from Nuclear Power School: one of the US Defence Department’s most rigorous and demanding academic programs.

“It’s a historic event for our navy, a historic event for our submarine force and a historic event for our nation,” said Australian Navy chief Mark Hammond, who attended their graduation ceremony at Goose Creek in South Carolina on Friday morning (US time).

“Two years ago this wasn’t on the radar, and we’ve come a long way in such a short period of time. But there’s a lot more work to do.”

The graduation was indeed a significant milestone for AUKUS, the $368 billion pact between Australia, the UK and the US to bolster the defence capabilities of the three nations and safeguard the Indo-Pacific against the growing threat of China.

But it was also a significant achievement for Lieutenant Commander Heydon, 31, Lieutenant Commander Klyne, 39 and Lieutenant Hall, 25 – three submariners from Queensland who are now on track to become Top Guns of the sea.

Having completed the six-month program at Goose Creek, affectionately known as “nuke school”, they will now undergo about six more months of “hands on” nuclear prototype training on a moored ship in Charleston and a further 10 weeks of training in Connecticut. They will then be assigned to a Virginia-class sub next year – the very type of vessels Australia plans to purchase from the US as it builds its own home-grown fleet – most likely in Pearl Harbour, Hawaii.

“I’m excited,” Klyne said of eventually qualifying to operate the reactors on nuclear-powered submarines.

“The US have been doing it for decades without serious incident … and this will give us the skills, knowledge and attitude to repatriate that to Australia.”

Nuclear Power School is often acknowledged as the most challenging training course in the US military. According to the navy’s website, students typically spend 40-45 hours per week in the classroom with an additional 10 to 35 hours per week of study outside of lecture hours.

In addition to meeting physical standards and security clearance requirements, enlisted applicants must be high school graduates who have scored in the top percentile in the military’s aptitude exam.

Think of it as a university engineering degree crammed into six months, says Heydon. Filled with subjects such as maths, physics, and thermodynamics, there’s an exam every week for 24 weeks, culminating in a major test at the end of the year to ensure you have what it takes to safely operate nuclear machinery.

And that, in itself, is no ordinary task. After all, nuclear-powered submarines such as the Virginia class models used by the US Navy can stay submerged for up to three months at a time – far longer than Australia’s fleet of diesel submarines, which need to frequently resurface to replenish oxygen and battery power.

Known as the “apex predators of the sea”, they are also heavily armed – each boat can carry about 37 torpedo-sized weapons, including Tomahawk missiles – and can seek and destroy enemy ships, conduct land attacks, and carry out intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19143924

File: cba8b2cef242127⋯.jpg (3.69 MB,3024x4032,3:4,Lieutenant_Commander_James….jpg)

File: dc2819ad00272d1⋯.jpg (639.1 KB,1772x1417,1772:1417,Australia_is_expected_to_a….jpg)

File: 2561495ecac18ab⋯.jpg (2.21 MB,4032x3024,4:3,The_Australians_spent_abou….jpg)

>>19143911

2/2

So why did the group decide to embark on such a career path in the first place?

“Being a submariner is a little bit strange, in and of its own right, but the challenge of operating and leading teams in nuclear-powered propulsion is something that really appealed to me,” said Klyne, a father of three originally from Brisbane.

Hall, another Brisbanite who used to be a signals and communications officer on HMAS Rankin and is the youngest of the group, said he saw an “opportunity for personal growth.”

And Heydon, a former marine engineering officer on HMAS Dechaineux, pointed to the research and technological advances for Australia.

“There’s lots of opportunity within this program: for engineers, for logisticians, for all rates and officers and branches – not just within the navy but within the public service and industry,” said the former Toowoomba resident. “We’re the start; the tip of the spear.”

Unveiled in March by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, US President Joe Biden and UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, AUKUS represents the biggest leap in Australia’s defence capability in history.

The sweeping plan will begin with more visits to Australian ports by US submarines this year and British vessels from 2026, before a fixed rotation of naval power in Perth from 2027. Over time, Australia will aim to build a new fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, entering service in the 2040s.

In the meantime, Australia will buy at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US, pending approval from the US Congress.

However, questions remain about the lengthy time frame and eye-watering cost; the maze of US export control laws that must be reformed for America to share nuclear technology secrets with Australia; and whether enough people can be recruited to build and run the new subs. Another question is whether Canberra is now tied to the whims of Washington.

Asked if Australia could develop its own nuclear training school to train officers, Vice Admiral Hammond replied: “I think if we’re serious about developing a sovereign nuclear submarine capability, then in time, definitely all parts of the ecosystem should be built and operated by Australians, in Australia.”

“The fact that we’ve got Australians here, studying at a nuclear power school, I think is a great indicator of just how far we’ve come,” added Hammond, who attended today’s graduation ceremony with top navy brass including Vice Admiral Jonathan Mead, the chief of the Nuclear Powered Submarine Taskforce and Admiral James Caldwell, the director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.

At present, there are six Royal Australian Navy officers enrolled in the school, and according to Hammond, “by this time next year, we’ll have somewhere between 20 and 30.”

“We’ll just continue to ramp up,” he said. “It’s a complex challenge, especially given the workforce environment back in Australia. Every company, every organisation wants talent, so we’re focusing very clearly on recruiting and retaining … I just need to get a whole bunch more Australians interested in joining.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/the-three-australians-on-track-to-become-the-top-guns-of-the-sea-20230708-p5dmpg.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVfzjyUPWN8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19143964

File: 802b0a5ffab0850⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Lieutenant_Commander_James….jpg)

File: 907f76ccd2d67a4⋯.jpg (2.5 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,An_example_of_one_of_the_c….jpg)

File: 3f011192d2851a1⋯.jpg (2.62 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Students_have_been_trainin….jpg)

File: 9e376253034980d⋯.jpg (2.27 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_Nuclear_Power_School_t….jpg)

File: 7e67bb5ccb4a1f0⋯.jpg (573.41 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,The_US_Navy_has_increased_….jpg)

>>18960157

>>19143911

Inside 'nuke school', the elite US training ground preparing Australian submariners for an AUKUS future

Jade Macmillan and Bradley McLennan - 8 July 2023

1/2

In America's deep south, a group of students has just completed one of the most rigorous academic programs in the US military.

And for the first time, there were Australians among them.

Three members of the Royal Australian Navy have graduated from the Nuclear Power School in South Carolina, more commonly known as 'nuke school'.

The training pipeline was established with the US as part of the AUKUS agreement, under which Australia will obtain its own nuclear-powered submarines.

"It's a historic event for our Navy, an historic event for our submarine force and I think it's an historic event for our nation," said Australia's Chief of Navy, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond.

"Two years ago, this wasn't on the radar.

"And we've come a long way in such a short period of time but there's a lot more work to do."

Years out from Australia's acquisition of nuclear-powered subs, the graduation is an early step towards making AUKUS a reality.

But there are still major hurdles ahead when it comes to the broader workforce challenges presented by the plan.

Inside 'nuke school'

The three Australians — Lieutenant Commander James Heydon, Lieutenant Commander Adam Klyne, and Lieutenant William Hall – started at the Nuclear Power School in November with the aim of eventually qualifying to operate the reactors onboard nuclear-powered submarines.

Lieutenant Commander Heydon described the course he's just graduated from as a "four-year engineering degree crammed into six months".

"Maths, physics, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, radiological controls, to how do we safely steward and manage the nuclear plant and the nuclear by-products, are I guess aspects of what we've been learning here," he said.

"My experience [in the Australian Navy] was ship design and ship construction.

"While they were aspects here, it was very foreign. So it was … a crash course into the deep end, sink or swim, and we all swam."

The Australians will now have to complete another set of practical learning, which will include spending time on retired nuclear-powered subs known as moored training ships.

After that, they'll receive further training in Connecticut before being assigned to a Virginia-class sub.

"The plan at this stage is to join submarines based in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, and they'll complete their training at sea," Vice Admiral Hammond said.

"Ultimately, we need them to pay their skills forward.

"So once they're qualified, sufficiently experienced, then we'll get them back into the ecosystem in a different role."

AUKUS presents major workforce challenges for Australia

The AUKUS plan, announced in San Diego earlier this year, will see Australia acquire a total of eight nuclear-powered submarines at a cost of up to $368 billion.

US submarines are increasing their visits to Australian ports from this year, and from 2027 HMAS Stirling naval base in Western Australia will host rotations of American and British subs under what's known as 'Submarine Rotational Force-West'.

Australia is expected to buy at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US from the early 2030s, before building its own nuclear-powered boats in Adelaide to be known as SSN-AUKUS.

They will be based on a British design using US technology, with the first scheduled to be delivered in the early 2040s.

Retired submariner and senior fellow at Washington-based think tank the Hudson Institute, Bryan Clark, described it as a "crawl, walk, run" approach.

"The biggest challenge is going to be transitioning from having some Australian-owned, US-built submarines … to having an Australian-built or at least a purpose-built Australian nuclear submarine," he said.

"It's going to require a massive amount of infrastructure, incredible workforce demand, both in terms of technical skills and numbers.

"It just seems like that's going to be a pretty heavy lift on the part of Australia to do nuclear ship construction."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19143974

File: 44543c6d7b3692c⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Bryan_Clark_a_retired_subm….jpg)

File: 54783b806182586⋯.jpg (623.25 KB,2000x1319,2000:1319,Australia_will_continue_to….jpg)

File: 60ae539b249b463⋯.jpg (634.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,HMAS_Stirling_is_Australia….jpg)

File: 0e34121921d165a⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,5000x3335,1000:667,The_AUKUS_deal_will_see_th….jpg)

File: 4f37e71fdf64b7a⋯.jpg (1.71 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Lieutenant_Commander_Heydo….jpg)

>>19143964

2/2

The federal government says AUKUS will create 20,000 jobs over 30 years across the Australian Defence Force, the public service and industry, including roles such as tradespeople, engineers and project managers.

The number of Australian submariners will also need to be increased, with nuclear-powered submarines carrying larger crews and requiring personnel trained to operate the reactor onboard.

"The submariners that come out of Australia are very smart, very capable, fully able to take on that challenge of becoming nuclear plant operators," said Mr Clark, who is also a former executive officer of one of the moored training ships in Charleston.

"The difficulty might be in getting the numbers that you need to be able to man a nuclear submarine."

Virginia-class submarines carry around 132 people, nearly three times the size of the crew onboard the Collins-class boats Australia has now.

And unlike the Collins, nuclear-powered subs do not need to surface regularly to recharge, meaning they can stay submerged for months at a time.

Vice Admiral Hammond acknowledged the scale of the task confronting the Navy.

"We were already focused on recruiting, increasing the size of the submarine force and then initially bleeding across in smaller numbers into the nuclear power program and then scaling up as we go," he said.

"So it's a complex challenge, especially given the workforce environment back in Australia.

"Every company, every organisation wants talent. So we'll be focused very, very clearly on recruiting and retaining."

Could Australia set up its own nuke school?

More Australians are expected to follow in the footsteps of the first three graduates in Charleston, while Navy personnel are also training in the UK.

But Vice Admiral Hammond said Australia could eventually host its own training program.

"I think if we're serious about developing a sovereign nuclear submarine capability, then in time, definitely, all parts of the ecosystem built and operated by Australians in Australia, that should be the aim point," he said.

"But we don't need it all at once."

Asked where it could be located, he said the "sensible approach" would be either Adelaide or Perth.

The new subs will be built in South Australia, while Western Australia's HMAS Stirling is undergoing an $8 billion expansion.

"They will be the two centres of excellence, if you like, for naval nuclear propulsion in Australia," Vice Admiral Hammond said.

"If you cast our minds forward, probably another 10, 15, 20 years, then the majority of the nuclear-trained submariners will be in the home port of the submarine force.

"There'll be a large number in Adelaide, but most of the boats won't be in Adelaide. So through that lens, probably WA.

"But that's a decision for governments and probably a decision for next decade, I'd imagine."

Challenges lie ahead to bring AUKUS to fruition

Aside from skills and workforce issues, there are other major challenges that still need to be overcome to bring AUKUS to fruition.

The sale of Virginia-class submarines to Australia requires the approval of the US Congress, and significant changes are needed to a complex set of export controls restricting how sensitive technology is transferred.

Questions also remain over how the US will deliver the promised Virginia-class submarines, given the pressure its own shipyards are under to meet local demand.

The US Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Michael Gilday, last month said it was "too early" to provide an answer on exactly where the subs would come from.

"I wouldn't expect them to start identifying submarines by name or by hull number just yet; we've got time to work through that," Vice Admiral Hammond said.

"But at the moment, there is a deep tripartite commitment to doing this."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-08/aukus-nuke-school-training-australian-navy-submariners/102572156

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19144068

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19105014

Satan Club returns for summer program

Roy Santa Croce - Jul 7, 2023

BINGHAMTON, NY - The After School Satan Club is inviting the community to participate in its summer program.

The ASSC, sponsored by the Satanic Temple, is a national organization that recently established a presence at Homer Brink Elementary School in Endwell. The Satan Club summer program takes place at the Broome County Public Library. The campaign director for the club, June Everett, says that each meeting is unique and promotes activities that relate to the seven tenants of the Satanic Temple. Everett says that the purpose of the Satan Club is to teach kids how to be a good person, not to stir up controversy.

“We’re not looking to create controversy, we’re not looking to upset the community, we just want to have an inclusive, fun, inviting place for those that don’t always feel comfortable sending their children to an Evangelical Christian Bible club,” said Everett.

In the most recent meeting, the kids used recycled materials to make scratching posts for cats. Everett says that each kid must have a signed permission slip to participate in the meetings. She hopes that once the summer program wraps up at the library, the club will be able to utilize space at Homer Brink for the start of next school year.

https://www.binghamtonhomepage.com/news/satan-club-returns-for-summer-program/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v31Sid52fHw

>Humanity is good, but, when we let our guard down we allow darkness to infiltrate and destroy.

>Like past battles fought, we now face our greatest battle at present, a battle to save our Republic, our way of life, and what we decide (each of us) now will decide our future.

>Will we be a free nation under God?

>Or will we cede our freedom, rights and liberty to the enemy?

>If America falls so does the world.

>If America falls darkness will soon follow.

>Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy.

>This is not about politics.

>This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow.

>We are living in Biblical times.

>Children of light vs children of darkness.

>United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19148884

File: 36d3be38d6cff81⋯.jpg (60.99 KB,1280x720,16:9,_The_government_doesn_t_tr….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19143769

Nationals leader David Littleproud urges government to create voice legislation before the referendum

PAIGE TAYLOR - JULY 9, 2023

Nationals leader David Littleproud says the government’s refusal to declare that it will legislate priorities for the indigenous voice to parliament goes to the heart of the dilemma facing Australian voters.

On Sunday indigenous Australians minister Linda Burney was asked if the advisory body’s remit would be legislated and responded by saying decisions about what the indigenous voice would advise on would be “a two way process” between the government and the advisory body.

Mr Littleproud believes the government’s decision to create the legislation for the voice after a successful referendum is causing difficulties for Australians trying to decide how to vote at the voice referendum due to be held between October and December.

He said on Sunday that not knowing whether the voice’s priority areas would be legislated was part of the problem.

“Shouldn‘t the Australian people have that level of detail before they are asked to vote?” he said.

Ms Burney last week revealed the four areas she wants the voice to concentrate on in an address to the National Press Club. Her priorities are jobs, housing, health and education. She said the Commonwealth work-for-the-dole scheme was failing in 1000 communities across Australia. However, disparity between indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians is not confined to those four topics and Ms Burney indicated on Sunday that the voice would want to give advice beyond those four topics.

“Obviously there are other issues like baby birthweights, life expectancy,” Ms Burney said on ABC program Insiders.

“That scope should be a respectful discussion with the voice.

“It will be a two way process. It will be something based on trust.

Asked to confirm that she would not legislate on what the voice could and could not advise on, Ms Burney said: “The voice is an independent body chosen by Aboriginal people, to represent their views and their voices in Canberra. And I will respect that independence”.

The Central Land Council has revealed its priorities for the voice are housing, food security and jobs.

While Anthony Albanese has maintained that the legislation for the voice would be shaped by Australians themselves and the parliament, Mr Littleproud has repeatedly urged the government to develop it ahead of the referendum.

“The government doesn‘t trust the Australian people to have the details so why would the Australian people trust them,” he said.

“On something as serious as changing the nation‘s constitution we shouldn’t be speculating on anything.

“When you control the parliament as the government does you should be prepared to put the legislation so the Australian people can see it before they vote.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/nationals-leader-david-littleproud-urges-government-to-create-voice-legislation-before-the-referendum/news-story/4cc7346ac2083f8cd8904423d940e67f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19148903

File: cde41cdff71f31a⋯.jpg (177.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prominent_voice_supporter_….jpg)

File: 3810fe47f7ee5bb⋯.jpg (317.48 KB,825x796,825:796,TM_1.jpg)

>>18928670

>>19037314

>>19138494

Voice advocate Thomas Mayo criticises media for publishing ‘negative headlines’ on ‘positive stories’

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - JULY 9, 2023

Voice to parliament architect Thomas Mayo has condemned the media for publishing “negative headlines” on “positive stories” about the upcoming referendum and said such actions had harmed the yes campaign.

Speaking at a University of Melbourne and Melbourne Press Club event, Mr Mayo said plenty of misinformation had been spread about the Voice. He also criticised some content published on social media platforms, labelling it “terrible”.

“It’s been frustrating to see positive stories with negative headlines and that is something that has been concerning,” he said last week.

“People tend to just read the headlines from time to time and that doesn’t help us.” Mr Mayo, a Kaurareg Aboriginal and Kalkalgal, Erubamle Torres Strait Islander man and union official, made the news last month after tweets he posted in 2018 revealed him saying it was necessary to have repatriations, give land back and pay rent to Indigenous people.

At the MPC event, Mr Mayo urged audience members to speak to “everybody you can possibly influence” and ensure they understood that the voice is “about fairness, recognition and a say for people that decisions are made about”.

Melbourne Uni’s director of university museums and collections, Rose Hiscock, opened the event and told the audience of more than 100 that she had “fan girled” Mr Mayo upon his arrival.

MPC president Ashlynne McGhee, an ABC journalist, interviewed Mr Mayo and asked him about a controversial full-page cartoon advertisement opposing the Voice published in Nine Entertainment’s Australian Financial Review newspaper last week.

It depicted Mr Mayo appearing to shuffle or dance as he received a handout from Wesfarmers chairman Michael Chaney.

McGhee explained it was “an advert that was published in an Australian newspaper today” and she said, “some people described it as an offensive, racist cartoon”.

Mr Mayo responded by asking the event attendees, “did anyone see that?” to which some people replied “yes”.

Mr Mayo then asked: “who reads The Australian?” This was despite the fact the cartoon ran in the AFR. The Australian asked Mr Mayo if he was aware the cartoon was published in the AFR despite him criticising The Australian, to which he said: “Yeah it was the AFR”.

Mr Mayo said he had moved on and was “too busy” to take too much notice of the cartoon. Nine has apologised for publishing the advertisement.

Mr Mayo told the audience that if the referendum failed it would impact the way Australia would be viewed globally.

The nation would be viewed as a “backward mob” which “doesn’t have constitutional recognition of people and doesn’t have a treaty”.

“I don’t think it’s the status quo if we fail, as if that status quo isn’t bad enough … but it is going to be worse because Australians would have officially said no to recognising our existence, our proud Indigenous heritage and culture,” he said.

“They would have said no to the simple fairness, to listening to the people you make decisions about and it would be hugely detrimental to all of us”.

The University of Melbourne’s executive and council have publicly affirmed their support for the Uluru Statement from the Heart and support a yes position in the referendum.

It is understood the MPC is open to holding a similar event that would include an advocate from the no side.

A University of Melbourne spokesman said there would be many speakers on campus to discuss the upcoming referendum including no campaigner, Indigenous businessman Warren Mundine.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/voice-advocate-thomas-mayo-criticises-media-for-publishing-negative-headlines-on-positive-stories/news-story/969e6324c4b3e6f6a9caa2964dbc88a5

https://twitter.com/thomasmayo23/status/1677537783278362625

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19148913

File: 291d4bf0ce38129⋯.jpg (217.57 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Brexit_Party_leader….jpg)

>>19132052

>>19139214

Ex-Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage says Clare O’Neil’s tweets criticising Trumps were ‘utterly stupid’

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - JULY 9, 2023

Former Brexit Party leader and British broadcaster Nigel Farage has questioned the calibre of cabinet ministers in Australia following the social media furore that erupted after Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil posted multiple tweets attacking Donald Trump and his son.

Mr Farage said the minister’s comments on social media were “utterly stupid” and it “looked comical, it’s so bad it’s funny”.

“Senior people very rarely delete tweets, I think I might have deleted one or two in 10 years … you should just never put yourself in that position, it was a pretty crass statement,” he told The Australian.

Ms O’Neil said in multiple social media posts that have since been deleted, that Mr Trump Jr was a “sore loser” and was “just a big baby” after his upcoming Australian tour was cancelled and she also said he had experienced “poor ticket sales”.

Despite this the organisers of Mr Trump Jr’s tour, Turning Point, said more than 8000 tickets were sold to his shows across the country including in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.

Mr Farage was due to join Mr Trump Jr in a speaking tour in Australia this week but the trip was cancelled after the American businessman was unable to get a visa until just 24 hours before he was due to leave the US.

A spokesman for Ms O’Neil was contacted for comment but did not respond.

Mr Farage, a presenter at conservative British news channel GB News, also criticised Australia’s cancel culture after a change.org petition drew more than 22,000 signatures calling for Mr Trump Jr to be stopped from getting an Australian visa.

“That’s the embodiment of cancel culture, it’s not only disagreeing with what you have to say or what I think you are going to say, it’s saying I don’t think you’ve got the right to say it,” Mr Farage said. “It really worries me that we have young activist students who don’t seem to be taught in the western world anymore what critical thinking is.”

Mr Farage recently made headlines after winning a British media award, the TRIC award, for best news presenter. Shortly after, organisers sent out a congratulatory tweet but in an unusual move later deleted it.

“I complained bitterly and the tweet was then put back up, but it was almost as if the industry didn’t acknowledge what their own viewers had done (voted for me),” he said. “Media (is) at its very worst, arrogant, out of touch, stuck in capital cities and with a relationship with many of their viewers and listeners that is breaking down.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/exbrexit-party-leader-nigel-farage-says-clare-oneils-tweets-criticising-trumps-were-utterly-stupid/news-story/3994bf5576c0f80d71d6e03b76be78e6

https://www.trumplive.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19148947

File: 837e8c1be3bce89⋯.jpg (297.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,After_Joe_Biden_refused_to….jpg)

File: 452138fde181dc7⋯.jpg (145.68 KB,1024x769,1024:769,JFK_was_assassinated_in_19….jpg)

File: 8a70c2f0a8468f4⋯.jpg (688.34 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,John_and_Jacqueline_Kenned….jpg)

File: 5f82483ec36818c⋯.jpg (309.52 KB,834x742,417:371,POTUS_29.jpg)

File: 1b21fac8da59898⋯.jpg (327.33 KB,852x469,852:469,Q_703.jpg)

Trump promises to lift the shroud on JFK murder, releasing all classified documents

ADAM CREIGHTON - JULY 9, 2023

Donald Trump has promised to release all the remaining top secret documents surrounding former president John F Kennedy’s assassination, after Joe Biden for the third year in a row refused to release a remaining fraction of them.

Former president Trump, the front runner for the Republican party’s 2024 presidential nomination, said on Friday (Saturday AEST) he would “declassify and unseal all JFK assassination related documents”, despite himself having withheld their release during his presidency.

“It‘s been 60 years, time for the American people to know the TRUTH!” Mr Trump said on his social media platform Truth.

The controversy surrounding the former president’s assassination in Dallas in November 1963 returned to the spotlight in April after Robert F Kennedy Junior, the former president’s nephew and Democrat presidential candidate, announced a White House bid, and repeatedly accused the CIA of being involved.

“The assassination was 60 years ago. What national security secrets could possibly be at risk? What are they hiding?,” Mr Kennedy, who also believes the CIA were involved in his father’s Robert F Kennedy’s assassination in 1968, said last week.

“Public trust in government is at an all-time low. Releasing these records would be a small but significant step toward regaining that trust”.

Mr Trump, who refused to release all the documents as president, told confidant and political strategist Roger Stone that the remaining documents were “so horrible you wouldn’t believe”, according to Mr Stone recollection in an interview on podcast Human Events last week.

“If, as the Warren commission insists, there was no international involvement nor foreign state actors involved in JFK’s murder, what would be the national security interest in keeping the record sealed”.

The Warren commission, appointed by the US government to investigate the murder, concluded in 1964 the US government was not involved, and the accused Lee Harvey Oswald, who was himself shot days after the assassination by nightclub owner Jack Ruby, before any trial, acted alone.

A subsequent congressional investigation in 1978 disputed the commission’s findings and concluded John F Kennedy was “probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy” but didn’t offer further details.

Animosity between JFK and the CIA and US military leading up to his assassination over the aborted Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba and the war in Vietnam, along with a series of unusual and hard to explain facts surrounding the murder, have fanned conspiracy theories for decades.

JFK, whose daughter Caroline is currently US Ambassador to Australia, sacked CIA director Allen Dulles, a leading figure on the Warren Commission, two years before the assassination.

In 1992 the JFK Assassination Collection Records Act instructed the National Archives to release all related documents by 2017 unless the president objected.

“This action reflects his instruction that all information related to President Kennedy‘s assassination should be released, except when the strongest possible reasons council otherwise,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters last week after the decision emerged late Friday night local time before the July 4 holiday weekend.

The Biden administration has declassified around 14,000 JFK-related documents, including a further 1,103 last week, amounting to around 99 per of the total, the White House said.

Jefferson Morley, a veteran US journalist who tracks the controversy, said around 4,000 documents remain classified or redacted on his Substack JFK Facts.

Experts on the murder have long given up on any smoking gun emerging from the remaining documents but expect them to show the CIA, or other parts of the US intelligence apparatuses, had greater knowledge of Oswald than was suggested by the Warren Commission.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/trump-promises-to-lift-the-shroud-on-jfk-murder-releasing-all-classified-documents/news-story/1fdf5ca29a32380c1955a58c67e561a0

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110673526538370986

https://themessenger.com/politics/rfk-jr-its-very-disturbing-that-biden-refused-to-release-more-jfk-assasination-docs

Q Post #703

Feb 10 2018 03:33:29 (EST)

“Rest in peace Mr. President (JFK), through your wisdom and strength, since your tragic death, Patriots have planned, installed, and by the grace of God, activated, the beam of LIGHT. We will forever remember your sacrifice. May you look down from above and continue to guide us as we ring the bell of FREEDOM and destroy those who wish to sacrifice our children, our way of life, and our world. We, the PEOPLE.”

Prayer said every single day in the OO.

JFK - Secret Socities.

Where we go one, we go all.

Q

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154565

File: 7fdf204889d782e⋯.jpg (116.07 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Meta_Australia_and_New_Zea….jpg)

File: 75274286280dcff⋯.jpg (111.05 KB,1280x720,16:9,Meta_will_provide_safety_t….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Social media company Meta said it will roll out measures to stamp out misinformation in the lead up to the voice referendum vote

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - JULY 10, 2023

Tech giant Meta has vowed to tackle misinformation about the voice referendum by providing “social media safety training” to MPs and advocacy groups, blocking fake accounts and significantly boosting its funding for fact-checkers.

The US-based company – owner of popular platforms including Facebook and Instagram – said it had been preparing for the referendum for a long time and it would implement a “comprehensive strategy to combat misinformation, voter interference and other forms of abuse on our platforms”.

Meta Australia’s director of public policy for Australia and NZ, Mia Garlick, said the referendum was a “significant moment for Australia” and the company was “committed to playing our part to safeguard the integrity of the referendum”.

“Many Australians will use digital platforms to engage in advocacy, express their views or participate in democratic debate,” she said.

“At Meta, we’re committed to playing our part to safeguard the integrity of the referendum.”

Meta said measures would include increasing artificial intelligence, which “can more effectively detect and block fake accounts” that were often behind the threats to elections and referendums.

Ms Garlick said Meta would also provide safety training to MPs, advocacy groups and not-for-profit organisations at the end of this month.

This includes educating attendees on Meta’s policies and tools including moderation functionalities to “keep their accounts and pages safe in the lead-up to the referendum”.

Meta will also provide a one-off funding boost for Australian fact-checkers, however the company would not disclose how much money would be spent.

The company also said it would work with RMIT University’s CrossCheck hub, which on its website explains that it “rigorously monitors online misinformation, pre-emptively alerts and guides our media and community partners of emerging online narratives and harmful trends”.

Meta will also work with the government’s election integrity taskforce and security agencies to increase its ability to combat misinformation.

RMIT FactLab CrossCheck’s APAC director Anne Kruger said its hub had an important role to play ahead of the referendum.

“In the voice to parliament referendum some narratives may not fit into a clear ‘fact check’ yet are still important in terms of educating the public safely and calmly,” she said.

“This multimedia project will allow us to highlight themes, including via social media, and support democratic discussion.”

Meta came under criticism earlier this year by the No campaign, accusing Facebook of “interfering with the democratic process” after several posts about the voice by conservative think tank The Institute of Public Affairs were restricted on its platform.

The social media giant refuted the claims and said the IPA had failed to include a required authorisation message on an advertisement against the vote, which it said failed to adhere to the platform’s rules.

Ms Garlick said Meta would also provide mental health support to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and it had been working closely with them in the lead-up to the referendum.

“Feedback we’ve heard is that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples may need additional support, before, during and after the referendum,” she said. “With this in mind, we’re partnering with ReachOut to create a dedicated youth mental health initiative.”

Charities including UNICEF will also be provided with advertisement credits to “raise awareness of voice-related media literacy” and help “raise the voices of a range of young people in support of the voice to parliament including Aboriginal youth”.

UNICEF Australia head of child rights policy, advocacy and child/youth voice Katie Maskiell said the move would provide “perspectives of our younger generations on this issue” and be a “meaningful use of social media and valuable contribution during the debate”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/social-media-company-meta-said-it-will-roll-out-measures-to-stamp-out-misinformation-in-the-lead-up-to-the-voice-referendum-vote/news-story/1c495cfe2f70f4bda5b691116b7be1f4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154602

File: 8e9c8f719584642⋯.jpg (382.64 KB,825x800,33:32,7NP_1.jpg)

File: d9349f21f386a64⋯.mp4 (15.07 MB,640x360,16:9,I0zzhHABTCOCF1Hp_1.mp4)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Fight breaks out over smoking ceremony

JENNA CLARKE - 10 July 2023

The opening of a freeway extension in Perth's northern suburbs was interrupted on Sunday when an argument broke out between two Indigenous men over who had the rights to conduct the traditional smoking ceremony.

The incident occurred at the Romeo Road ribbon cutting ceremony that was being conducted by Transport Minister Rita Saffioti.

The premiere of the $232m, 5km project was halted – again.

This time it was an awkward cultural stand off, not construction delays which previously held things up.

"I don't need permission off you or anyone else, this is my country too," one of the Indigenous representatives said.

"Neither do I," the other man replied as the minister backed away while other Labor politicians, including WA's Attorney General John Quigley, look bemused.

"I thought you fellas were from Moora," one man said.

"Well, you thought wrong," the other replied.

Other Elders had to step in to placate one man, telling him: "You're included in this, alright?"

"Well, it doesn't seem like it," he replied.

Ms Saffioti was asked about the incident as it played out.

"It's very interesting. Obviously there's a lot of Aboriginal groups with history in this area," she told 7 News Perth before blaming her department for "handling" the booking.

The Australian has contacted Ms Saffioti.

It's the second cultural issue that has plagued the Cook government in as many days.

On Saturday, a tree planting exercised was cancelled in Geraldton after a "respected local knowledge holder" stepped in citing WA's new Aboriginal cultural heritage laws which came into effect on July 1.

The individual did not have any authority to do so according to Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/keatings-swipe-at-nato-as-pm-flies-to-summit/live-coverage/5ecc84afd558f4b1e724ff4d7938c5be#107466

https://twitter.com/7NewsPerth/status/1677988765430849539

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154635

File: be162317710472e⋯.jpg (346.33 KB,825x797,825:797,9NP_1.jpg)

File: c5a4d218b291c13⋯.mp4 (15.4 MB,640x360,16:9,ky4z65RNcVWceip_1.mp4)

>>18928670

>>19154602

New Aboriginal heritage laws ‘shut down’ tree planting event

JENNA CLARKE - JULY 10, 2023

Updated Aboriginal cultural heritage laws in WA have reportedly stopped a tree planting event to commemorate the late Queen Elizabeth II at the weekend.

Geraldton mayor Shane van Styn said a well publicised, planned event to plant trees at Wonthella Bush Reserve - an area damaged by a deliberately lit fire last year - had to be cancelled due to conflict and confusion caused by WA’s new heritage legislation, a week after it came into effect.

Mr van Styn said he “shut down” the project to help mark the late Queen’s Jubilee after a local resident raised last minute concerns regarding the area, which is located about 425km north of Perth.

“Despite checking the site online prior, for any Aboriginal heritage, of which there was none, a respected local knowledge holder shut down proceedings on the basis of ground disturbance and the new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act and the ‘significance’ of the site to the family,” Mr van Styn said.

“Their efforts were (also) part of restoring the remnant bush land.

“This is the first use of powers of entry and stoppage we are aware of under the Act, despite technically not being an official Aboriginal Inspector under the Act as no local Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Services has yet been created to appoint them as such. So some confusion is now in play.”

Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti confirmed to The Australian the Elder acted without authority and has now called for the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage to “investigate further”.

“The modernised laws did not allow for the Elder to shut down the event,” Mr Buti said. “The modernised laws do not provide authority for anyone to shut down an event.

“It’s important to note that a situation like this could have occurred for the past 50 years under the old legislation - and although rare, it has occurred in the past.

“The modernised laws now provide practical exemptions.

“In this rare event, we understand the Mayor decided to respectfully acknowledge the Elder’s wishes and defer the event,” he said.

The roll out of the new laws, drafted in a bid to prevent another Juukan Gorge disaster, were rushed through WA’s parliament in a matter of days in late 2021 during the pandemic.

The implications of the move went largely unrealised until the release of regulations outlining the details in early April – just three months before the legislation was introduced.

Key documents, such as guidelines for surveys commissioned to identify and manage Aboriginal cultural heritage, were only made public a fortnight before the laws were implemented last week.

The Cook government is also yet to establish the 40 Local Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Services - the planned “one-stop shops” that will consult with traditional land owners, farmers, resource companies and landowners of more than 1100 sqm wishing to alter or make additions to their property, like building a veranda or altering a fence line.

An online petition signed by close to 30,000 people calling for the WA government to delay the roll out of the new laws was ignored.

This incident in Geraldton comes on the eve of federal Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney’s visit to regional WA where she will meet with organisations in rural areas like Albany and Port Hedland to promote the Indigenous voice to parliament.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/new-aboriginal-heritage-laws-shut-down-tree-planting-event/news-story/ae1143f5ba6c5d6de384b490cf9b505d

https://twitter.com/9NewsPerth/status/1677989273805672448

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154665

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19005499

>>18928670

'Progressive No': Thorpe tells 60 Minutes voice to fail

ELLEN RANSLEY - 10 July 2023

Victorian senator Lidia Thorpe told Karl Stefanovic he was “not bad for a white guy” during a wide-ranging interview where she addressed her past scandals head-on.

The fiery and outspoken politician appeared on 60 Minutes on Sunday where she explained her combativeness is “misunderstood”.

Now a leader of the progressive No campaign against the upcoming voice to parliament, Senator Thorpe told Stefanovic she does not see the proposal getting up later this year.

“I’m part of the progressive no, and … we want more,” she said.

She said the progressive no was built on something significantly different to what she called the “racist no”.

“We are not one homogenous group of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We’re allowed to think differently and we are allowed to say no on the grounds that it is not enough,” she said. The Greens defector turned independent senator said while she may be considered a “bona fide troublemaker”, she did it for “all the right reasons”.

While riding e-scooters around the nation’s capital, Thorpe surprised viewers when she admitted Stefanovic was “not bad for a white guy”.

She told him she was a “no bullsh*t” type of politician, committed to cutting through the drivel and “calling it for what it is”, she walked around with a bullseye on her.

“I’m not this angry, crazy black woman out there that hates white people. It’s just not who I am,” she said.

“I’ve been called so many things since I was a child that after a while it’s water off a ducks back.”

During the interview, Senator Thorpe opened up about her upbringing, including how she left school at 14, became pregnant at 17, and became the target of violence.

“I suppose I was used to violence from my first relationships, and it’s happened so many times that I just kept getting back up,” she said.

She also said of her decision to declare bankruptcy in 2013, as a single mother of three after leaving a toxic marriage, the “best decision” she ever made.

Four years later she made history as the first Aboriginal woman in the Victorian parliament, and when she lost her seat at the 2018 election looked to Canberra and was sworn in 2020 as a Greens senator for the state.

She told Stefanovic she doesn’t intend to run again when she’s next up for election, because the parliament need “new people, younger people coming in with fresh ideas”.

Her time in Canberra has been mired in controversy and scandal, notably a brawl outside a Melbourne strip club, her links to former Rebels bikie boss, and her activity at various protests.

On the strip club controversy, Senator Thorpe told Stefanovic she had been verbally abused, and the only thing she did wrong was “reacting to someone else’s bad behaviour, when I probably shouldn’t have”.

She left the Greens earlier this year, telling Stefanovic it had happened for “a number of reasons”.

“As an independent, I can speak on anything that I like and unfortunately as a political party, the Greens are no different to Labor and the Coalition parties where racism does exist … (including) inside the Greens … from places that should know better,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/keatings-swipe-at-nato-as-pm-flies-to-summit/live-coverage/5ecc84afd558f4b1e724ff4d7938c5be#107435

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=on97W4F6cjs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154732

File: 9eecad3cbbf5d65⋯.jpg (126.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Paul_Keating_claims_the_NA….jpg)

File: 78da23aaa143044⋯.jpg (69.18 KB,618x772,309:386,Jens_Stoltenberg_and_Antho….jpg)

File: 7b1bf4bb98375f6⋯.jpg (288.33 KB,825x830,165:166,LMB_1.jpg)

File: 4ac7a5aefc77b8c⋯.jpg (155.85 KB,976x1600,61:100,F0lEivNXwAA50dK.jpg)

File: d8d683707ea93f0⋯.jpg (66.1 KB,1042x1600,521:800,F0lEi5ZWwAAeA_4.jpg)

>>18708612 (pb)

Keating’s swipe at NATO leader Jens Stoltenberg as Albanese flies to Lithuania for summit

GREG BROWN - JULY 10, 2023

Paul Keating has savaged NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg as a “supreme fool” and claimed the military alliance had impeded peace since the Cold War, causing a diplomatic headache for Anthony Albanese ahead of his attendance at the summit of North American and European leaders.

With the Prime Minister invited to the summit in Lithuania as part of a grouping of Indo-Pacific guests, Mr Keating signalled his opposition to Australia’s attendance by declaring NATO had no business expanding its footprint into Asia.

The intervention from the former Labor prime minister comes as Mr Albanese will kick off his week of international travel in Berlin by signing a $1bn defence export contract with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.

The deal will see Australia supply more than 100 Boxer heavy weapon carrier vehicles to Germany from 2025, supporting 1000 jobs in Queensland.

Mr Albanese said it was “one of the biggest defence sales in Australia’s history”, with the Prime Minister to also discuss expanding the trade of low emissions products with Germany.

From Berlin, Mr Albanese will go to Lithuania on Tuesday as one of the Indo-Pacific Four nations along with Japan, South Korea and New Zealand. Mr Albanese is expected to announce a fresh assistance package for Ukraine.

United States Studies Centre director Peter Dean said Mr Albanese’s attendance at the summit showed NATO nations were increasingly looking towards the Indo-Pacific to help contain China’s influence.

“One of the things that a lot of the NATO countries in particular will be interested in talking to our Prime Minister about is his ability to withstand Chinese trade collusion,” Professor Dean said.

“At a broader strategic level, it is about how these two regions who are facing off against Russia in one and China in another, trying to work together to uphold rules and standards, norms and sovereignty.”

In a statement released on Sunday, Mr Keating said it was a mistake for Mr Stoltenberg and NATO nations to compare China with Russia.

“Stoltenberg, in his jaundiced view, overlooks the fact that China represents 20 per cent of humanity and now possesses the largest economy in the world,” Mr Keating said.

“And has no record of attacking other states, unlike the United States, whose bidding Stoltenberg is happy to do.”

The former Labor prime minister praised French President Emmanuel Macron for blocking a proposal to expand the grouping into Asia through a liaison office in Japan.

He said it would be wrong to export the “malicious poison” of European and American militarism to Asia.

“The Europeans have been fighting each other for the better part of 300 years, including giving the rest of us two World Wars in the last 100,” Mr Keating said.

“Exporting that malicious poison to Asia would be akin to Asia welcoming the plague upon itself. With all of Asia’s recent development amid its long and latent poverty, that promise would be compromised by having anything to do with the militarism of ­Europe – and militarism egged on by the United States.”

Mr Albanese will make a speech at the NATO summit on Wednesday and hold bilateral meetings with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Mr Macron, Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and Portugal’s Prime Minister Antonio Costa.

The Prime Minister said he would “catch up” with US President Joe Biden and Britain’s Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, but did not say whether they would be formal bilateral meetings.

At the weekend, Australia fell short of condemning the US for providing cluster bombs to Ukraine, bucking the trend of other Western nations that have signed a treaty opposing possession of the munitions.

Mr Biden on Friday said it was a “very difficult decision” to send cluster munitions to Ukraine as part of a $US800m assistance package, but it was necessary because Ukrainian fighters were running out of ­ammunition.

When asked about the cluster bomb assistance, a spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said “Australia continues to condemn Russia’s illegal and immoral invasion of Ukraine”.

“We note President Biden’s comments that this was a difficult decision, but one essential to supporting Ukraine’s counter­offensive,” she said.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham is demanding Australia increase its assistance to Ukraine.

Writing for The Australian, Senator Birmingham said it was a shame Australia was no longer the largest non-NATO contributor to Ukraine.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/keatings-swipe-at-nato-leader-jens-stoltenberg-as-albanese-flies-to-lithuania-for-summit/news-story/68c98724b079756be9458e629383f4c1

https://twitter.com/latikambourke/status/1677947704259878912

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154748

File: 9e14cceb65e1562⋯.mp4 (8.41 MB,640x360,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_attempts_….mp4)

File: 5d52b139e5b19fd⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,NATO_secretary_general_Jen….jpg)

>>19154732

Anthony Albanese calls NATO chief a 'friend of Australia' after Paul Keating's 'supreme fool' comment

Paige Cockburn - 10 July 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described the head of NATO as a "friend" of Australia's while trying to distance himself from former prime minister Paul Keating who labelled the secretary-general a "complete fool".

Last night Mr Keating issued a statement that slammed NATO's planned expansion into Asia, warning it could bring the "militarism of Europe" into the region.

"Exporting that malicious poison to Asia would be akin to Asia welcoming the plague on itself," Mr Keating wrote.

He went on to describe NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg as a "supreme fool".

"Stoltenberg by instinct and by policy is simply an accident on its way to happen," he said.

Shadow Home Affairs Minister James Paterson told ABC RN the comments were a "particularly unhinged spray", but Mr Albanese would not be drawn on the remarks.

The prime minister is set to attend the NATO leader summit in Lithuania tomorrow, which comes at a crucial moment in Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

But Mr Albanese said he did not expect there to be any tension between him and Mr Stoltenberg due to Mr Keating's comments.

'"Not [awkward] at all," Mr Albanese said from Berlin.

"Jens Stoltenberg is a friend of Australia. I have met him on a number of occasions and we need to remember the role NATO is playing.

"There is a war in Europe. This is a war about the international rule of law, about whether a large nation can seek to impose its will on a smaller nation.

"We support the extraordinary effort NATO is showing because this is a struggle that has implications for the whole world."

Mr Albanese attempted to distance himself from Mr Keating when asked whether the former prime minister should refrain from commentary.

"I'm interested in looking forward, my constructive engagements with NATO" he said.

"I'm very proud that under my prime ministership this is the second NATO summit that's been held and it's the second time I've been invited to participate …"

NATO has plans to open a liaison office in Tokyo where it would coordinate activities with other Pacific partners including Australia, New Zealand and South Korea.

Earlier this year, during a visit to Japan, Mr Stoltenberg described Europe and Asia as "interconnected".

"If President Putin wins in Ukraine, this would send a message that authoritarian regimes can achieve their goals through brute force. This is dangerous. Beijing is watching closely," he said.

But French President Emmanuel Macron has made it clear he will oppose the plan, arguing NATO should stay focused on the North Atlantic.

While in Berlin today Mr Albanese signed off on a defence deal which will see Australia supply more than 100 Boxer combat vehicles to Germany.

It is one of Australia's largest-ever defence export contracts and is set to inject $1 billion into the Australian economy and create 1,000 jobs in Brisbane.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-10/anthony-albanese-calls-jens-stoltenberg-a-friend-of-australia/102583698

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154758

File: f8eb424544791d0⋯.jpg (117.28 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_Germa….jpg)

File: 5c0afcf94858709⋯.jpg (61.77 KB,768x1024,3:4,NATO_Secretary_general_Jen….jpg)

File: 70b14c5f1ee2774⋯.jpg (119.15 KB,768x1024,3:4,Ukrainian_Ambassador_to_Ge….jpg)

>>19154732

Anthony Albanese agrees $1bn defence deal with Germany

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - JULY 10, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has announced an export deal with Germany for more than 100 Boxer heavy weapon carriers, worth more than $1bn to the Australian economy.

On arrival in Berlin where he will meet with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz later today (AEST). the Prime Minister said the two countries were ready to announce a series of deals including that involving the Boxers.

These will be produced by the German company Rheinmetall in Redbank, Queensland, which employs 1000 people.

Mr Albanese said: “This will be one of our largest ever exports, it will guarantee the 1000 jobs there in Queensland will go into the future and it’s worth in excess of $1bn to the Australian economy.

“This will boost our sovereignty, increase our defence capability and boost our economy.

“This is a great outcome, the first outcome of quite a few ready to announce tomorrow with our friends here in Germany and I thank Chancellor Scholtz for his very kind invitation to come here to commemorate these agreements we will enter into.”

Mr Albanese landed in the midst of a tense row over Ukraine’s accession to NATO – with Germany blamed for Russia’s aggression; and a diplomatic row about the United States-supplied cluster munitions to Ukraine.

Mr Albanese is in the German capital to discuss Australia’s ambitious emissions reductions targets.

Germany has been leading international standard of conditions for the decarbonisation of industry, investment in sustainable industrial technologies and expand “green” products, including green hydrogen.

They are eyeing Australia for green hydrogen supplies to help with an energy deficit brought about by the war in Ukraine. Australia is also likely to use the meeting to get Germany’s support to help revive the ailing Australian-EU free trade deal talks. The talks, bogged down in France and Ireland agribusiness protectionisms – will be ramped up in Brussels later this week.

But the expansion of the climate-friendly alliance and enhanced military manufacturing ties between Australia and Germany have already been overshadowed by geopolitical manoeuvres, with Berlin continuing to block Ukraine’s call for immediate accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.

Hungary is also opposed, with other European countries also worried that urgent Ukraine membership agreed at this week’s NATO summit in Vilnius would then immediately drag the European continent into the Russian war.

Mr Albanese, who will attend the summit on Tuesday and Wednesday, also faces some embarrassment following former Labor prime minister Paul Keating’s outburst calling NATO general secretary Jens Stoltenberg a “supreme fool” and attacking NATO’s “malicious poison” of European and American militarism to Asia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154769

File: c93f13d67609ba9⋯.jpg (365.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_man_walks_past_an_unexpl….jpg)

>>19154758

2/2

On Sunday Ukraine‘s ambassador to Germany, Oleksii Makeiev, urged NATO to put an end to ambiguity over Ukraine’s membership of NATO and called on Germany not to repeat past mistakes under former chancellor Angela Merkel.

”At the summit in Vilnius, we expect a clear and unequivocal invitation and direction to join NATO,“ Mr Makeiev said.

Mr Makeiev said mistakes were made during the NATO 2008 summit in Bucharest where Mrs Merkel opposed Ukraine’s fast-tracked membership to the alliance. He reminded Germany that the previous intransigence had led to the current Russian war.

“If Ukraine had already been a NATO member in 2014, the Crimean annexation, the war in the Donbas and now the Russian large-scale war of aggression would certainly not have taken place,” Mr Makeiev told the German wire agency DPA.

While Mr Scholz and Mr Albanese will be meeting in the German Chancellery, the United States president Joe Biden will be meeting with British prime minister Rishi Sunak to discuss Ukraine’s NATO ambitions and overturn British objections to the US providing cluster munitions to Ukraine soldiers. He is to also meet with King Charles III at Windsor Castle for talks on environmental issues.

The supply of cluster munitions, which Mr Biden said was a “very difficult decision”, comes as NATO plans to offer Ukraine a deepening political path to a stronger association with NATO, but is understood to be stopping short of a full offer to immediately join the alliance.

Cluster munitions are highly controversial because many fail to explode, leaving vast areas of countryside unusable – and with the munitions attractive to the inquisitive and to children, can be lethal in years to come, long after the war finishes.

“It was a very difficult decision on my part. And by the way, I discussed this with our allies,” Mr Biden told CNN. “The Ukrainians are running out of ammunition.”

Australia was one of the first signatories to ban the cluster munitions, signing the United Nations Convention on Cluster Munitions in 2008, a document which has since been signed by 120 countries – but the convention has not been signed by Russia, Ukraine or the United States.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/albanese-lands-in-berlin-as-ukraine-blames-germany-for-russias-aggression/news-story/130e2523346dce76eeb0481e42567fc2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154790

File: 9bca0f2c0783b60⋯.jpg (183.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>18946058

>>19104595

>>19154732

German troops join US in Australian war games

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - JULY 10, 2023

Hundreds of German troops will arrive in Australia this week and join with the United States and 11 other nations in extensive military exercises as a part of a “productive relationship that we are developing with our German friends” to boost defence in the Indo-Pacific.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was spending Monday meeting with the German chancellor Olaf Scholz to strengthen the defence ties in Australia’s region as 240 German paratroopers and marines were already en route to Australia. Mr Albanese foreshadowed further announcements about these military connections after his scheduled two hour meeting on Monday evening.

The German military will take part in the comprehensive exercise, called Exercise Talisman Sabre, in Jervis Bay, NSW, Darwin and across Queensland alongside troops from Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand Papua New Guinea, Tonga, the United Kingdom and Canada. As well, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand will be observers.

Talisman Sabre is to test planning and conducting combined and joint military operations to improve combat readiness and interoperability between Australian and United States’ forces and other partner nations. The inclusion of Germany in the exercise is a reflection of the closer ties Australia has forged with the European nation in recent years, and not only a $1bn deal to export 100 Rheinmetall Defence Australia Boxer Heavy Weapon Carriers to Germany.

Last year the Germans participated in the Australian military exercises Pitch Black and Exercise Kakadu in the Northern Territory, but the involvement of 170 German paratroopers and 40 German marines this time is a big step up from previous engagements. It signifies Germany’s interest and concern about China’s moves in the Indo-Pacific region.

Mr Albanese said in Berlin ahead of meeting the German chancellor and then attending the two day NATO summit in Vilnius: “I’m looking forward to having the opportunity to outline Australia’s position on international relations and defence issues, but also on showing solidarity that the Australian government has with NATO.”

He said Australia’s trade discussions with the German leader “are a part of the productive relationship that we are developing with our German friends”.

Asked about former prime minister Paul Keating’s attack on NATO and the leadership under secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg, Mr Albanese said: “Jens Stoltenberg is a friend of Australia. I’ve met him on a number of occasions. And we need to remember the role that NATO is playing. There is a land war in Europe. This is a war about the international rule of law, about whether a large nation can seek to impose its will on a smaller nation. This is about national sovereignty. This is about the people of Ukraine, struggling to defend their democracy and their sovereignty. And Australia stands with the people and government of Ukraine. But we also support the extraordinary effort that NATO is showing, because this is a struggle. That is has implications for the whole world. I’m interested in looking forward to my constructive engagement with NATO.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/german-troops-join-us-in-australian-war-games/news-story/07c2d5d6e8755024a94847499fd50042

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154798

File: e8f61a56bdb10d6⋯.jpg (1.14 MB,3054x2036,3:2,Solomon_Islands_Prime_Mini….jpg)

>>19104349

Solomon Islands leader visits security partner China with focus on infrastructure

Kirsty Needham - July 10, 2023

SYDNEY, July 9 (Reuters) - Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare arrives in China on Sunday for his first visit since striking a security deal, pledging to "remain neutral" amid rising China-U.S. competition and prioritise his nation's development needs.

Western analysts said Sogavare would be feted after signing the security pact that alarmed Washington and some Pacific Islands neighbours including Australia last year. Concern over China's naval ambitions in the strategically-located region prompted Washington to strike a defence agreement with Papua New Guinea last month.

Sogavare highlighted his focus on infrastructure in a speech to mark the 45th anniversary of independence from Britain on Friday, where he said bigger countries were jostling for influence.

"We want to remain neutral because it is not in the interest of our people and country to take sides and align ourselves with interests that are not our interests. Our national interest is development," he said.

The need for infrastructure on islands outside the capital Honiara was urgent, he added.

Already, Chinese telecoms giant Huawei is building a cellular network financed by a $66 million Chinese EXIM bank loan, prompting concern by a parliamentary committee about the debt burden, and a Chinese state company will redevelop Honiara's port.

On a week-long trip funded by Beijing, Sogavare will open the nation's embassy, meet Chinese companies, and visit Jiangsu and Guangdong, his office said.

"The relationship continues to thrive and expand, a testament of a serious connection," his office said.

China's foreign ministry said China and the Solomon Islands had "contributed to peace, stability and development in the region", and the two countries leaders would discuss international and regional issues.

In a local television interview, Sogavare said the Solomon Islands was dependent on aid from Australia, but was shifting its foreign policy to look for opportunities with China, as well as India and Gulf states.

Sogavare came to power in 2019, switching the nation's diplomatic ties from Taiwan to Beijing.

Honiara will host the Pacific Games in November. China has constructed the stadium, is advising on security, and will train 80 Solomon Islands athletes arriving in China this week.

"The timing is about the Pacific Games, the athletes are being sent over, and showing gratitude… this is the domestic theatre of Chinese foreign policy," said Graeme Smith, a Pacific affairs experts at the Australian National University.

Sogavare will be feted as "this small nation that dares to stand up to the U.S. and to stand up to Australia," he added.

Solomon Islands has one of the closest relationships with China in the region, said Meg Keen, director of the Lowy Institute's Pacific Islands program.

"With the Pacific Games and elections coming up, Sogavare will be seeking resources for national and political advantage," she said.

"It is not a zero-sum game," she added. Sogavare will leverage geopolitical rivalries to also accept aid from the U.S. and Japan.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/solomon-islands-leader-visits-security-partner-china-with-focus-infrastructure-2023-07-09/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154815

File: 872e7c0f9325c5d⋯.jpg (596.36 KB,2560x1413,2560:1413,Prime_Minister_Sogavare_du….jpg)

File: ff89e3d139593a3⋯.jpg (561.05 KB,2560x1863,2560:1863,Prime_Minister_Sogavare_ma….jpg)

File: b58db31452a3cfe⋯.jpg (584.16 KB,2560x1049,2560:1049,Members_of_the_Prime_Minis….jpg)

>>19104349

>>19154798

Prime Minister Sogavare participates in the first High Level Meeting of Forum on Global Action for Shared Development in China

Fredrick Kusu July 10, 2023

Prime Minister Hon. Manasseh Sogavare began his weeklong engagement with the Government of the People’s Republic of China this morning.

Prime Minister Sogavare’s delegation consisting of Government Ministers, back benchers, senior government officials and representatives of the Solomon Islands business community arrived yesterday afternoon in Beijing and was accorded heavy security escort. The busy Beijing traffic gave way to the motorcade of more than 20 vehicles. The Solomon Islands and PRC flags were flown alongside each other along the streets as if to welcome the Prime Minister into Beijing.

This morning, the Hon Prime Minister participated in the historic first High Level Meeting of Forum on Global Action for Shared Development.

Taking the podium during the forum, Prime Minister Sogavare began by paying tribute to President Xi Jinping who proposed the concept of “Building a Community with a Shared Future for mankind” following the launching of the Global Development Initiative last year.

The Prime Minister confirms, Solomon Islands signed the Global Development Initiative in March this year.

Prime Minister Sogavare stated, the crisis of biodiversity loss, climate change, pollution, global crisis, the pandemic, conflict and civil unrest gives the gathering a greater sense of purpose and responsibility to recover from the multidimensional crisis as well as to fast track implementation of the 2030 Agenda.

He said, “building common prosperity is investing in peaceful co-existence. This is the future we must strive to achieve.”

Prime Minister Sogavare underscored the need to rise above those that want to create a divided world with ideological geopolitical fault lines…..“we must remain united in our focus in creating innovative paths of cooperation to close the gap between the haves and the have not. Share our development experience using frameworks such as the Belt and Road Initiative to convert our potentials into prosperity.”

Solomon Islands is pleased to have in place a non-reciprocal trade arrangement with China and looks forward to forge more trade arrangements with members of the Forum.

The Prime Minister explains, as part of the China Global Development Initiative, Solomon Islands signing an Aviation Agreement this week will facilitate trade and people movement. In doing so I am pleased to acknowledge Solomon Islands – China connectivity structural transformation investment…..“161 towers will be installed, and for the first time unify and connect our geographically scattered populations.”

Prime Minister Sogavare also highlighted the need to empower Solomon Islanders economically with quality infrastructure to eradicate poverty. China is Solomon Islands largest infrastructure partner. Construction of Solomon Islands Games facility support the country’s nation building process to which the country is grateful to China.

He urged the Forum to sow seeds of stability by addressing food and public health securities adding, China’s hand of friendship in reaching out to the world with vaccines, medical equipment and supplies defined the South South solidarity.

The Prime Minister thanked China for its commitment to construct a new comprehensive Public Medical Center in Solomon Islands National Referral Hospital. Solomon Islands is pleased that the People’s Liberation Army Naval Peace Ark will be visiting Solomon Islands, he stated.

Climate change remains a threat multiplier, taking more ambitious climate mitigation action with a special focus on renewable energy and the transfer of green technology.

Prime Minister Sogavare also singled out China’s Investment in the country’s youth.

“Let me thank China for investing in the youth, equipping them with skills and specialized training. Solomon Islands has a number of students and athletes in China. They are our present and future.”

Our interaction as a community of states remains people centered, strong on firm foundations of the principle of building a community with a shared future based on the respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, equality and mutual trust and benefits. Guided by a sharing and caring approach that equips countries of the south to independently choose their development paths suited to their interests and conditions, Prime Minister Sogavare concluded.

The Governments of the People’s Republic of China and Solomon Islands emphasized, the current state visit focuses on areas of mutual cooperation to further strengthen the two nations’ relations in the face of geopolitical pressure.

https://www.sibconline.com.sb/prime-minister-sogavare-participates-in-the-first-high-level-meeting-of-forum-on-global-action-for-shared-development/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154823

File: e8ca0fb3c1c1167⋯.jpg (177.73 KB,1200x720,5:3,National_flags_of_China_an….jpg)

>>19104349

>>19154798

Sogavare’s visit to deepen ties between China and Solomons

PICs reject Western Cold War mentality, eye development and growth: analysts

Zhang Han - Jul 09, 2023

Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands Manasseh Sogavare arrived in Beijing to start his weeklong visit to China - his second - on Sunday, during which the leaders of the two countries will have in-depth exchanges of views on bilateral relations and international and regional issues of mutual interest. He will also inaugurate the country's embassy in China, meet company executives and visit East China's Jiangsu and South China's Guangdong provinces.

Sogavare's visit will undoubtedly inject strong development momentum to deepen and broaden bilateral cooperation, showcasing tangible gains through China ties which feature "mutual respect, mutual trust and mutual benefit" against the backdrop of Washington's exploitation of Pacific Island Countries (PICs) in the China-US rivalry, observers said.

China-Solomon Islands relations have been on the fast track since the two countries established diplomatic relations in September 2019.

Chinese President Xi Jinping warmly welcomed Sogavare during the latter's first visit in October 2019, when the two leaders charted the course of bilateral relations. In May 2022, then Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited Solomon Islands and the two sides signed cooperation documents.

Chinese Foreign Minister spokesperson Wang Wenbin said at Thursday's routine press briefing that Prime Minister Sogavare's visit to China, the second in four years, will provide new impetus for further growth in bilateral relations. The opening of the embassy, which was postponed by the COVID-19, will play a pivotal role in bridging the two countries and two peoples, Chen Hong, executive director at the Asia Pacific Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Sunday.

This year marks the 10th anniversary of the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and Solomon Islands, despite being a latecomer to the BRI, tells a successful story of bilateral cooperation that has regional implications for the Asia-Pacific, Chen noted.

According to analysts, infrastructure, hospitals and schools are some of the concrete topics on Sogavare's agenda.

China has assisted the Solomon Islands to build a landmark stadium in Honiara, its capital. Chinese telecom giant Huawei is building a cellular network and a Chinese company has won the bid to redevelop Honiara port, Reuters reported Saturday.

Sogavare will also visit Guangdong and Jiangsu - two engines of the Chinese economy - which signifies bilateral cooperation is becoming deeper and more profound, Chen said.

Chen said that Guangdong's Jiangmen is a sister city of Honiara and lots of Guangdong businesspeople are exploring markets in the South Pacific. Guangdong can serve as a springboard for China-Solomons cooperation considering its economic vitality, and its special status in bilateral people-to-people exchanges, Chen noted.

As the two countries move forward their relationship under the principle of "mutual respect, mutual trust and mutual benefit," the tangible benefits the Solomon Islands receive come in sheer contrast to US and Western aid, which shrank quickly and was largely applied in political and ideological fields, Yu Lei, chief research fellow at the Research Center for Pacific Island Countries of Liaocheng University, told the Global Times on Sunday.

To maintain sustainable development and long-term prosperity, the Solomon Islands rejected the West's Cold War mentality and the old way of treating the South Pacific as "an arena of strategic competition," analysts said.

Sogavare's visit, coming amid the US and Australia's "charm offensive," smears against China and domestic elections in 2024, will consolidate mutual political trust and is a demonstration of the incumbent Solomon Islands government's clear mind on development and political wisdom in the middle of the current China-US rivalry, Chen noted.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1294002.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154878

File: c9feaf780041093⋯.jpg (2.5 MB,7195x4797,7195:4797,Exiled_Hong_Kong_lawyer_Ke….jpg)

File: 84835180c813bf7⋯.jpg (201.2 KB,1200x800,3:2,China_relations_strained_a….jpg)

>>19120607

>>19126437

>>19126504

OPINION: On the weekend my footy team lost. On Monday, there was a $190k bounty on my head

Kevin Yam, Democracy activist - July 10, 2023

1/2

I was at the MCG on Sunday, full of hope for my mighty Hawks, only to see them whipped by the Blues. My mood brightened that night when Pat Cummins’ boys won an epic victory against the Poms at Lord’s.

So I was in an upbeat mood on Monday, working from home on a draft of my law PhD research proposal, when a Twitter notification popped up. A journalist covering a Hong Kong National Security police press conference that day had tagged me in a tweet.

The news: Hong Kong had placed a $192,000 bounty on my head and urged Australia to “stop harbouring fugitives”.

Along with seven others, there is now a warrant out on me for alleged national security offences. According to Hong Kong chief executive John Lee, we will be “pursued for life”.

My alleged crimes were calling for action in response to China’s crackdown on Hong Kong in meetings with Australian members of parliament and the foreign minister, as well as testifying by video-link before United States Congress.

Hong Kong is my birthplace. I moved to Melbourne in 1986 as a 10-year-old and did my secondary and university education here before moving back to Hong Kong. I spent more than two decades there as a student, lawyer and democracy activist, until I returned to Melbourne in 2022. What Hong Kong authorities now accuse me of has all taken place since 2022, when I returned to Australia as an Australian citizen.

I first got involved in Hong Kong legal sector politics in 2014, which led to me and some friends founding Hong Kong’s Progressive Lawyers Group in 2015. This led to pro-Beijing media in Hong Kong running a full-page story on me being a “black hand”. However, before my return to Australia in 2022, I had already been “retired” from activism for a few years. Only after resettling in Australia did I think that since I’ve got a voice in a free country, I had to use it for my beloved Hong Kong.

I knew that speaking out like this would mean I could never go back to my birthplace. But I had no idea how much my recent actions had attracted Beijing’s attention until that tweet arrived.

Despite this, I continue to live normally in Australia. And why not? The support I have received from across the spectrum in Australia and beyond has been overwhelming, including from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Friends from everywhere have congratulated me for earning a badge of honour in resisting authoritarian tyranny.

If only living normally with a bounty over my head was so straightforward.

Start with my dealings with family and friends. I had to leave multiple chat groups that have Hong Kong-based family and friends in them, lest I get them into trouble. I had to remove from my private social media account anyone who works for the Hong Kong government or police, or harbour pro-Beijing sympathies, as well as their family members. And then, a leader of a Melbourne Hong Kong community group arranged to pass a message to me, asking me not to attend an upcoming event organised by the group.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154885

File: 273dac97782db5f⋯.jpg (2.9 MB,5397x3598,3:2,Photos_of_eight_activists_….jpg)

File: 898db2f86a97b2b⋯.jpg (1.83 MB,3200x3565,640:713,Hong_Kong_issues_arrest_wa….jpg)

>>19154878

2/2

Then there has been dealing with media. Authoritarians can be so inconsiderate – they decided to put a bounty on my head on the eve of a school holiday trip to Sydney. Trying to meet as many media commitments as possible without incurring the wrath of an otherwise very supportive wife, who was understandably worried about the holiday being ruined, was tricky. Sometimes the balancing act can be precarious, such as speaking with The Age’s opinion editor during a fine dining meal, using an extended trip to the toilet as a pretext. A number of interviews were declined or abruptly cut short to maintain domestic peace.

On the whole, however, journalists, photographers and my wife were all very understanding about the competing demands on my time and mind. But even with this, complications can arise. When I packed for Sydney, I brought lots of clothing that carries the emblem of my former cricket club in Hong Kong, which I loved wearing casually. I ended up having to remove all such clothing before video interviews and photo shoots, lest my former club is politically pressured into publicly disowning me. These are the kinds of ridiculous things one has to consider when one is targeted by an authoritarian regime.

The fear of adversely impacting on others does not end with cricket clubs. As media reports emerged on how my case might cause the prime minister’s visit to Beijing to be derailed, I was hit by pangs of guilt. What if Australian journalist Cheng Lei’sand Australian writer Yang Hengjun’s incarceration is lengthened because of this? What if businesses and workers whose income has been affected by China’s trade sanctions have to wait longer of things to get back to normal? I had to constantly remind myself that I did not create this situation – that the fault lies with an authoritarian China acting like a schoolyard bully.

So yes, “living normally” post-bounty is not really that normal. That said, these minor inconveniences and self-doubts are nothing compared with those in Hong Kong whose freedoms have been crushed. Many of my friends have been jailed simply because they wanted rights that we in Australia take for granted. Living as a citizen of a liberal democracy, I owe it to brave Hongkongers to continue speaking out for them, until Hong Kong is free.

Kevin Yam is a non-resident senior fellow of Georgetown University Centre for Asian Law, and a master of laws student at the University of Melbourne.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/on-the-weekend-my-footy-team-lost-on-monday-there-was-a-190k-bounty-on-my-head-20230710-p5dn02.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154951

File: 2e9a332eaf9c730⋯.jpg (128.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,Plastic_surgeon_Professor_….jpg)

File: 0a6711a9e052f09⋯.jpg (261.52 KB,1920x1080,16:9,El_Chaston_AFLW_player_on_….jpg)

File: 4e4810ce7f55329⋯.jpg (74.75 KB,1280x960,4:3,El_Chaston.jpg)

File: 6f2bba72dc228ab⋯.jpg (592.84 KB,1112x817,1112:817,_torilittle_.jpg)

>>18871739 (pb)

>>18940103

>>18992091

Plastic surgeons call for age limit as young teenagers line up for ‘top surgery’

NATASHA ROBINSON - JULY 9, 2023

1/2

Leading surgeons are calling for the national medical regulator to step in to set “clear and specific guidelines” on gender-affirming surgery, including consideration of whether the age at which transgender adolescents are ­legally allowed to go under the knife should be raised to 18.

Australia is one of the most liberal countries in the world in sanctioning children under 18 to get double mastectomies, a practice that is rare but appears to be increasing despite only a handful of surgeons around the country being willing to perform such procedures.

The case of a 15-year old child in Queensland having “top surgery” has prompted Mark Ashton, a plastic surgery specialty elected counsellor to the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and Melbourne University professor of surgery, to question the lack of regulations.

“There is no doubt gender ­affirming surgery is becoming significantly more mainstream surgery, with increasing demand, and the regulation hasn’t kept up,” said Professor Ashton, who serves on the Board of Training and the Council for the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons.

“I can’t think of any circumstances in which a 15-year-old person should be electively having a double mastectomy. This is irreversible and is major surgery.

“In my opinion, because of its permanency, the surgical procedure needs to be delayed, at least until the person is 18.”

The federal government’s nat­ional virtual public health information service Healthdirect says top surgery can be performed, with parental consent, on minors over the age of 16, but “some surgeons will provide surgery to younger people in very specific situations”.

The case of the 15-year-old, which The Australian has independently confirmed, is complex and unusual. The child, whose parents both supported the surgery despite the child identifying as transgender for only about a year, posted on social media describing how they had the surgery in a day hospital after one consultation with a psychiatrist who approved the procedure.

“Fifteen in my personal opinion is too young, unless you can clearly identify and clearly document a well-considered psychiatric and medical assessment and specific recommendation over a prolonged period of time,” Professor Ashton said

“As adults looking back on our youth, those ages of between 12 and 18 were accompanied by a whole series of emotional turmoil, self-reflection and-self doubt. This is permanent, irreversible surgery that cannot be undone.

“I don’t believe there is adequate and due consideration in some of these cases as to whether this is a transient, emotional, psychological feeling, or is this indeed a permanent feeling, that is, the person truly is transgender.

“Any decision to embark on gender affirming surgery must be established over time, by a multidisciplinary team comprising a diversity of medical experts.

“It is really incumbent upon the federal health minister, state ministers and the national regulatory body, AHPRA, to ensure that these patients, our children, are protected from less scrupulous unethical practitioners who see transgender surgery as yet another opportunity to make money.

“We need clear and specific guidelines as to how the decision to proceed to gender affirming surgery is made, and by whom.”

Medical Board of Australia chairwoman Anne Tonkin said ­issues around gender affirming surgery were “complex and polarising”, especially when they involved children. “We are closely monitoring ongoing community discussion of these sensitive and complex issues,” she said. “As always, we will take our lead from the voice of the people, through parliament and legislation.”

Dr Tonkin said all doctors were bound by a medical practice code of conduct that makes explicit the standards of ethical and professional conduct expected of them.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19154960

File: 3c301195726a652⋯.jpg (48.56 KB,650x1000,13:20,El_Chaston_2.jpg)

File: 9a76c836ba6c87b⋯.jpg (54.01 KB,650x1000,13:20,El_Chaston_3.jpg)

File: fb9bc1ad3b65686⋯.jpg (68.34 KB,1280x720,16:9,El_Chaston_pictured_gettin….jpg)

>>19154951

2/2

Professor Ashton is one of three breast reconstruction surgeons to whom The Australian has spoken to confirm that as the medical transition of young people has grown more common in recent years, surgeons are now being approached by people who want to reverse surgical procedures. This appears to be a manifestation of the concerns of cautious doctors such as those at The Children’s Hospital at Westmead’s gender clinic that a proportion of teenagers who present wanting to transition gender will later desist or detransition.

Trans advocates, who claim double mastectomies on minors almost never happen, say detransition rates are minuscule.

“If you’re banning Botox or fillers fundraisings but saying gender reassignment surgeries are OK, I think we’ve got a problem,” said one surgeon.

“I would certainly think this incredibly invasive and life-changing surgery needs to have decisions made by adults. This surgery is very disfiguring, it’s irreversible and it needs to be put into that context – it’s a major, major, major change, and it shouldn’t be being offered to children.”

There is no public data on how many people are getting gender reassignment surgery, with double mastectomies being performed under the same Medicare item number as cancer surgery.

Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons president Nicola Dean said doctors in the field were pushing for a separate Medicare item number for the procedure. Associate Professor Dean said the age issue for getting surgery was the subject of significant active debate around the world among plastic surgeons. “I think the real issue here is that there are many people in Australia with gender incongruence who are currently left outside of the healthcare system and who have difficulty accessing the care they need,” Professor Dean said.

“In medicine there are often complex factors to consider to decide when a patient has developed capacity to consent to procedures.

“I think it is wrong to use the very private matter of the medical treatment of a child as a vehicle for very public debate. In all areas of surgery, we come across cases where there are exceptional ­circumstances.”

Professor Dean said she agreed with Professor Ashton that ­evidence-based protocols of care were critically important.

“It is clear from clinical research, both in Australia and all around the world, that people with gender incongruence have a high risk of problems with mental health and gender dysphoria,” Professor Dean said.

“It is also clear from the literature that medical and surgical treatment can be very effective in improving the health of these individuals.

“Not everyone with gender incongruence needs medical treatment. But some do. Some countries have very developed protocols of care, whereas Australia’s are still developing.

“The WPATH guidelines are a good starting point, but more ­Australia-specific protocols on surgical treatment will evolve and be helpful for health professionals and patients. It is important that these are patient-centred and based on the medical evidence.

“I think what is important is that for people to gain a diagnosis of gender incongruence, it has to be marked and persistent. There are clear diagnostic criteria.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/plastic-surgeons-call-for-age-limit-as-young-teenagers-line-up-for-top-surgery/news-story/cdee6579aa8d3dba083fe894e7749576

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/former-aflw-player-el-chaston-opens-up-on-lifechanging-breast-removal-surgery-to-find-their-true-self/news-story/597e0adc7e23c033d987e7d108daa2f8

https://archive.vn/sq0Qv

https://twitter.com/LaurenHeraldSun/status/1659381054913019904

https://www.instagram.com/p/CnROE6ovkgx/

https://www.valleyplasticsurgery.com.au/dr-alys-saylor/

>Think logically.

>Ask yourself - is this normal?

>Conspiracy?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160107

File: cd8128ad55980d2⋯.jpg (242.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Steve_Jacobs_on_Sunday.jpg)

File: b095ddeb5eb2da6⋯.jpg (111.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,An_unidentified_man_interr….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19154602

>>19154635

Indigenous voice to parliament: WA heritage laws cast shadow over referendum

PAUL GARVEY and JENNA CLARKE - JULY 11, 2023

Separate incidents in different corners of Western Australia have underscored the difficult introduction of the state’s new Aboriginal cultural heritage laws and further complicated the Yes campaign for the voice in the west.

Premier Roger Cook and Treasurer Rita Saffioti on Monday had to clarify the details of different matters, including the abandonment of a planned tree-planting in the Mid West city of Geraldton and a heated argument between two Indigenous men over who had the rights to conduct a smoking ceremony at the opening of a highway extension.

Geraldton mayor Shane Van Styn said he had “shut down” an event to plant trees at Wonthella Bush Reserve on Saturday due to conflict and confusion over heritage legislation that came into ­effect last week.

The project, held to mark the late Queen’s jubilee, was deferred after a resident raised last-minute concerns regarding the area. He said a check of an online register found there was no Aboriginal heritage at the site, but “a respected local knowledge-holder shut down proceedings on the basis of ground disturbance and the new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act and the ‘significance’ of the site to the family”.

The dozens of Local Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Services, or LACHS, that are expected to ­facilitate the new regulations are not in place but Mr Van Styn said the groups would ultimately “have more power than the cops”. “LACHS officers can walk into businesses, on to sites and shut things down citing cultural issues. They can also appoint an Aboriginal person to act on their behalf also, which will have the same powers,” he told The Australian.

“If, as a city, I’ve got axes swinging and excavators digging and people come on to a worksite without the appropriate PPE, they can shut down plant operators immediately.”

But Mr Cook slammed the use of “alarmist language” around the incident and the broader heritage act, telling reporters that the new legislation was not about giving Indigenous representatives the ability to intervene in and disrupt planned works.

“The event that was anticipated by the city of Geraldton over the weekend could not have been stopped by the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act,” he said.

“My understanding is that the City of Geraldton officials took ­respectful action to make sure that they didn’t further escalate the situation because of the association with the Queen, not because of ­Aboriginal cultural heritage issues.”

Separately, an otherwise unremarkable opening of a new stretch of freeway in Perth’s north on Sunday was marred when an Indigenous man objected to the selection of Whadjuk Noongar man Steve Jacobs to conduct a smoking ceremony.

“I don’t need these people coming out here thinking you fellas can say this, say that on this land,” one man said in footage captured by 7News.

Mr Jacobs replied that he didn’t “need permission off you or anybody else”.

“This is my country too,” Mr Jacobs said.

Ms Saffioti on Monday said the government had invited representatives from several Aboriginal communities with links to the area.

“In all communities people have different views, whether they are Aboriginal communities or not Aboriginal communities,” she said. “Out of respect, we invited representatives from all the groups, but then someone else ­attended and that person took issue with the elder undertaking the smoking ceremony.”

Both incidents come as support among West Australians for an ­Indigenous voice to parliament appears to be waning.

Federal MP Rick Wilson on Monday said he believed opposition to the voice was as high as 80 per cent in his vast West Australian electorate of O’Connor, citing the ­response of 1487 people to a survey emailed to his own database.

Mr Wilson said the Geraldton tree-planting incident was exactly how he expected the new heritage act to play out and warned that a 20 per cent Yes vote in WA could be optimistic if the state government did not backflip on the new regulations.

Asked if the latest episodes in WA could hurt support for the voice, Mr Cook called for community to unite behind the Yes campaign. “The voice is an extraordinary once-in-a-generation opportunity for all Australians to acknowledge and be respectful and allow for the consultation of Aboriginal people in relation to laws that impact them,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-wa-heritage-laws-cast-shadow-over-referendum/news-story/6066100c3d9318c66b185ed464c18981

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160117

File: 7d2651f9b8a26ff⋯.jpg (321.61 KB,2048x1152,16:9,From_left_Lockhart_River_m….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Indigenous voice to parliament: ‘Last great chance for our communities’, says Noel Pearson

SARAH ELKS - JULY 11, 2023

Noel Pearson has warned a voice to parliament is the “last great chance” for the nation’s remote Indigenous communities, as Cape York mayors ask how many more people have to die early before Australians do the right thing.

Aboriginal leader Mr Pearson urged non-Indigenous Australians to vote Yes, and said he was confident the campaign could win over the “ground zero” state of Queensland despite recent polling tipping a majority No vote.

Addressing the Queensland Media Club in Brisbane with Aurukun mayor Keri Tamwoy and Lockhart River mayor Wayne Butcher, voice co-architect Mr Pearson said the constitutional change was “modest but profound” and would lead to life-changing practical benefits on the ground.

“How important this is for the practical benefit of communities, particularly traditional and remote communities, I can’t emphasise enough,” Mr Pearson said.

“I work with people throughout the Kimberley, throughout the Northern Territory, throughout Cape York. I’ve got to emphasise, for those communities, this is the last great chance – the best hope we have for those communities. It’s crucial we get this right.”

Mr Butcher said during his 12-year stint as mayor of remote Lockhart River, on the northeastern coast of Cape York in far north Queensland, he had gone to parliament in Canberra many times but had not been listened to.

He said the “normal practise” of government decision-making for Aboriginal communities was “we know what’s right for you”.

“The challenge is, no one listens. And you never get heard anyway, even if you do speak,” he said.

Enshrining Indigenous people in the Constitution would ensure stability of leadership, regardless of changing governments, Mr Butcher said, and would allow for real change.

He said that despite hundreds of millions of dollars in government health funding for Cape York and the Torres Strait, the life expectancy of an Indigenous man living on the peninsula was just 55 years old.

“A lot of people say, ‘you Aboriginal mob, you get plenty of money’, But when the money leaves Canberra, it has to come to Brisbane first, and when you’re remote, it goes to Cairns before it gets to Lockhart,” Mr Butcher said.

“So you just imagine how many people have taken a bite out of the cherry on the way through.

“When I come back home and jump on the shovel and bury people younger than me, some days I go to bed and think ‘what the hell’s going on here’. But that’s where we’re at.”

“By saying no, what are you saying no for? What’s the alternative?”

Mr Butcher said of the more recent 10 women who had died in his community, only three were elderly, and the other seven were aged under 45.

Ms Tamwoy, who was elected mayor of Aurukun – on the northwestern coast of Cape York – in 2020, agreed that the multi­million-dollar health system for Indigenous Australians was “failing miserably”.

When she returned to Aurukun, she would have to prepare for two funerals.

“I sit here with heavy heart, because how many of our people must continue to die, well before their age, before Australia does the right thing by us?” she said.

“We are all Australians.”

Mr Pearson said remote communities needed the ability to speak to bureaucrats and governments, and be heard, “if we want to close the gap on disadvantage”.

“When we talk about giving people a voice to the bureaucracy and the government, we simply want to sit down at a table with them,” he said. He described a four-sided table where representatives of an Indigenous community, the federal government, state government and local council each had a seat, to speak about plans for the community, floodlights for the sporting fields, land tenure for the old people’s home, and tackling heart disease.

“Follow us, don’t try to lead us anymore. We know what we’re doing. We’ll close this gap. You can’t rely on anyone else to close the gap other than the people who are affected by the problem,” Mr Pearson said.

He said while polling showed at least 80 per cent of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people backed the voice, Indigenous Australians made up only 3 per cent of the population.

“We can’t win the referendum, our numbers just don’t count. It’s your 97 per cent that counts – you, the whitefellas. You’re the ones … it will fall to you, the 97 per cent, to decide whether we seize this ­opportunity.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-last-great-chance-for-our-communities-says-noel-pearson/news-story/78a7bc2416efaeea09e1a936c078b191

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160130

File: e4a748a9059708e⋯.jpg (4.23 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Visiting_Solomon_Islands_P….jpg)

File: b0f628c56a00982⋯.jpg (335.31 KB,1440x960,3:2,Visiting_Solomon_Islands_P….jpg)

>>18960157

>>19104349

>>19154798

China, Solomon Islands take swipe at AUKUS in announcing new strategic partnership

Reuters / theage.com.au - July 11, 2023

Beijing: China and the Solomon Islands have signed a deal on police cooperation as part of an upgrade of their relations to a “comprehensive strategic partnership”, four years after the Pacific nation switched ties from Taiwan to China.

The police cooperation pact was among nine deals signed after Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing, underlining his nation’s foreign policy shift.

Sogavare arrived in China on Sunday for his first visit since the two countries struck a security pact last year, to the alarm of the United States and neighbours including Australia.

“In just four years, the relationship between China and the Solomon Islands has developed rapidly, and we can now say that it is very fruitful,” Li told Sogavare.

Sogavare, in turn, thanked China for its role in addressing global challenges including peace and sustainable development. He added that his country had “a lot to learn” from China’s experience.

A spokesperson for the US National Security Council said Washington “respects the ability of nations to make sovereign decisions in the best interests of their people” while encouraging the sides “to release these texts immediately to increase transparency and inform discussions about the impacts of these agreements on regional security”.

The US official added that Washington was committed to a strong relationship with the region and strengthening longstanding bonds with the people of Solomon Islands.

Sogavare switched diplomatic ties from Taiwan to Beijing when he came to power in 2019. Beijing claims democratically governed Taiwan as part of its own territory.

Last month, Sogavare called for a review of a 2017 security treaty with Australia, which has historically provided policing support to the Solomon Islands, including the rapid deployment of police in 2021 to quell riots, although China has increased its police training there.

China will continue to provide assistance to the Solomon Islands to enhance its law enforcement capacity, according to a joint statement released by China’s official Xinhua news agency.

It urged “relevant countries” to “prudently” handle issues such as the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea and cooperation on nuclear submarines, in a thinly veiled swipe at Japan and AUKUS, the alliance among Australia, the United States and Britain.

‘Trustworthy friends’

Sogavare also met China’s President Xi Jinping on Monday afternoon and the two agreed to establish a comprehensive strategic partnership, according to Chinese state television.

“China and Pacific island countries are both developing countries and should strengthen mutual assistance within the framework of South-South cooperation,” Xi said in the meeting.

China has long supported so-called South-South cooperation, which refers to cooperation between developing nations as equals for mutual benefit.

Describing the two countries as “trustworthy friends and reliable brothers”, Xi said China-Solomon Islands ties have set a “good example of solidarity and cooperation” between countries of different sizes and between developing nations.

Xi told Sogavare that China supports more of its firms investing in the Solomon Islands and will continue to provide economic and technical assistance “without political strings attached”.

Sogavare’s office highlighted “quality infrastructure” as an area that the country needs for economic empowerment to eradicate poverty.

Chinese telecoms giant Huawei is already building a cellular network in the Solomon Islands, financed by a $US66 million ($98.7 million) Chinese EXIM bank loan. A Chinese state company will also redevelop the port in the capital Honiara.

Xi also pledged support for a 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent, referring to a grand blueprint agreed among Pacific nations on advancing the region’s strategic goals over the next three decades.

The two countries also reached agreements in civil aviation, trade, economy, technology and sports, including a deal on “Sports Technical Assistance Project” as Honiara is hosting the Pacific Games in November. China has constructed the stadium.

Sogavare will be in China until Saturday and will officially open his country’s embassy in Beijing.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/oceania/china-solomon-islands-take-swipe-at-aukus-in-announcing-new-strategic-partnership-20230711-p5dnbu.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160144

File: 7b505941a8c8d52⋯.jpg (6.04 MB,5500x3667,5500:3667,Visiting_Solomon_Islands_P….jpg)

>>19104349

>>19160130

Solomon Islands, China should publish details of police deal, Australia says

Kirsty Needham - July 11, 2023

SYDNEY, July 11 (Reuters) - Australia said the Solomon Islands and China should "provide transparency of their intentions to Australia and the region" by immediately publishing details of a policing deal signed in Beijing.

The police cooperation pact was among nine deals signed after Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing.

A spokesperson for Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia was aware of reports referencing a policing implementation plan linked to a deal signed between China and Solomon Islands in March 2022.

"We are concerned that this development will invite further regional contest," the spokesperson said in a statement.

"Solomon Islands and China should provide transparency of their intentions to Australia and the region by publishing the agreement immediately, so the Pacific family can collectively consider the implications for our shared security."

Australia had expressed strong concern at the prospect of China's security presence in Solomon Islands in 2022, when a security pact was struck between those two countries. That deal prompted Pacific Island nations to agree to a "Pacific family first" approach to security, the statement said.

Last month, Sogavare called for a review of a 2017 security treaty with Australia, which has historically provided policing support to the Solomon Islands, including the rapid deployment of police in 2021 to quell riots.

China has increased its police training in Solomon Islands in recent months. The deal signed in Beijing on Monday will allow for a police presence until 2025.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/solomon-islands-china-should-immediately-publish-details-police-deal-australia-2023-07-11/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160164

File: 3132da61fefa6a8⋯.jpg (1.41 MB,4592x2851,4592:2851,Chinese_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

>>19104349

>>19160130

America walks the walk in battle for Pacific minds

ANTHONY BERGIN - JULY 9, 2023

1/2

NATO leaders gather in the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, this week and Ukraine will dominate the summit. Anthony Albanese will be there. Security is global so it’s positive that he is attending. But we can’t escape our own region. Fortunately, there’s good news here.

The US is finally starting to walk the walk in the Pacific. In May, the US signed a Defence Co-operation Agreement with Papua New Guinea that allows the US military to deploy assets to select PNG military bases in the event of an emergency. It’s a nice counterpunch to what China’s got going with Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare in Solomon Islands. If the US-PNG agreement is properly funded and staffed, then PNG will become a key location for the US to build some real influence in Melanesia.

Anytime our principal ally gets access to a piece of strategic territory is a good thing. PNG lies across some of the most significant air and sea approaches that link us to our defence and trading partners in north America and Asia.

The test will be what the US makes of it. Let’s hope we’ll see increasing US rotations through PNG. The challenge for the US will be not to do too much or too little, to keep it as a priority over the long term, and not something that’s hot for a few months and then drops off the radar screen. To ensure that Port Moresby is glad they signed the deal, the US will need to make clear that it’s all about Papua New Guineans, not the Americans.

The US deal with PNG to counter illicit transnational maritime activity through joint at-sea operations and the US agreeing to share satellite data with PNG to enhance its maritime domain awareness capabilities will also be useful if it helps close gaps in enforcement. We can assist by deploying Royal Australian Navy or Border Force patrol boats, or both, to work co-operatively with PNG and US assets in patrolling PNG’s waters.

The US will provide funding support for PNG’s ability to address transnational organised crime-enabled corruption and money laundering. In theory that’s helpful, although it would be more useful if the US intelligence community were directed against Chinese organised crime activities and other corrupt Chinese activities in PNG.

The US and Australia should now be looking to build defence infrastructure at Milne Bay at the extreme southeastern tip of PNG. A glance at an atlas shows why the bay attracted the attention of Japanese strategists more than 80 years ago. It offers better potential defensive coverage of the vital Solomon and Coral seas than Manus Island more than 500 nautical miles to the north.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160166

File: c3083a18b6e714a⋯.jpg (394.54 KB,1600x1066,800:533,OPENING_OF_THE_U_S_EMBASSY….jpg)

>>19160164

2/2

Palau and the Federated States of Micronesia have recently signed their Compacts of Free Association with the US and they now go to congress for approval and appropriation.

The third, with the Marshall Islands, has yet to be signed.

Beijing’s goal is to undermine these entities’ relationships with the US.

The compacts provide a prerogative for the US to operate its military bases in the countries and a veto over other countries’ military access to the region.

COFAs provide the US military with the ability to respond to potential contingencies in the Taiwan Strait, in the South China Sea, in the East China Sea, or on the Korean peninsula.

It’s good news that Washington has recently opened embassies in Solomon Islands and Tonga, with another planned for Kiribati. It’s appointed a US special envoy to the Pacific Islands Forum and re-established Peace Corps programs in four island states.

It’s noteworthy that AUKUS has the blessing of Fiji, the Federated States of Micronesia, and Samoa. A few island governments have expressed concern over keeping the region a nuclear-free zone, but only Tuvalu has condemned AUKUS. The island states have expressed no real anxiety about the Quad. Fiji, given its large Indian diaspora, is positive given India’s involvement. The Micronesian states appear supportive given close ties with the US and Japan.

The Pacific Islands find it difficult to counter Chinese coercive activities on their own. We need to work in concert not just with the US, but friends like New Zealand, Japan, France, Britain, Taiwan, and others. The islands have appreciated the Israel-Pacific Food Security Alliance providing agricultural training. South Korea recently held its first summit meeting with Pacific Island leaders. At a summit with 14 Pacific Island countries in Port Moresby in May, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a 12-point action plan for the region focusing on health, community development, and renewable energy.

The recent performance by the US in the Pacific Islands region is a model of how to reverse strategic decline. Working with the US and partners to offer the island countries more viable options is the best way to prevent our Pacific family aligning with a strategic competitor.

Anthony Bergin is a senior fellow at Strategic Analysis Australia and an expert associate at the National Security College.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/america-walks-thewalk-in-battle-for-pacific-minds/news-story/900aaa1127eb4b2f8b207459a85fe982

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160171

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

'Contempt': Popular Chinese social media platform WeChat refuses to front foreign interference probe after repeated requests

The shadow home affairs minister has accused Chinese social media app WeChat of showing contempt to the parliament after it refused to front a Senate foreign interference inquiry.

Tyrone Clarke - July 11, 2023

Popular Chinese social media platform WeChat has again refused to front a Senate inquiry into foreign interference prompting an outburst from shadow home affairs minister James Paterson.

Senator Paterson, the chair of the Select Committee on Foreign Interference Through Social Media, has repeatedly requested WeChat appear at public hearings over concerns of its immense influence in the Chinese diaspora community.

While the committee has the power to compel witnesses to appear, the company has no formal Australian headquarters or operations and is therefore exempt from those powers.

WeChat is an extremely popular instant messaging application released more than a decade ago which has more than one billion monthly users.

With hearings starting on Tuesday, Senator Paterson revealed his latest appeal to the app’s parent company Tencent had fallen on deaf ears.

“WeChat has replied to my letter - and continues to show contempt for the parliament of Australia with their ongoing refusal to assist the work of the Select Committee on Foreign Interference Through Social Media,” Senator Paterson said on Twitter.

In response to the Senator’s July 4 letter, Tencent’s head of corporate affairs legal Elizabeth Byun again rejected the request.

The company argued it was unable to attend the hearings on Tuesday because it does not have “local operations or employees based in Australia”.

While refusing the invitation, the social media outlet said it was “committed to providing responsive information to the committee” by writing in response to any questions put to it.

The select committee was established in November 2022 with the sole focus to inquire and report on the risk posed to Australia and its democracy by foreign interference through social media.

WeChat is the only social media company which has refused to appear in front of the committee.

Senator Paterson has previously warned that if the inquiry could not hear directly from WeChat it would be “forced to consider only the highly critical evidence” it has received relating to the platform.

The Senate committee is focussing on all interference from foreign social media companies, but a particular lens has been reserved for those based in and operated from China, including WeChat and TikTok.

Concerns have been raised over the two popular platforms and their inherent links to the Chinese Communist Party as well as the government’s involvement in operations.

Under article 7 of China’s National Intelligence Laws, all companies are required to “support, assist and cooperate” with the government’s intelligence efforts.

Many private Chinese companies also have in-house cells of the ruling Communist Party as required under strict government regulations.

Tencent is home to more than 7,000 CCP members, with a recent report by Sina Tech claiming party officials are “becoming the main driving force in shaping the company’s development direction”.

TikTok has also been subject to growing international scrutiny over persistent concerns raised by several global intelligence agencies that the application could pose espionage risks.

The Australian Government followed the US, UK and the EU in banning the social media app from all government devices in April, while Washington looks to further avenues to stem the cyber threat.

The United States has demanded ByteDance divest its financial interests in TikTok or risk facing a potential ban.

Last year TikTok admitted it had used its app to spy on journalists, with data being used by ByteDance employees to track the reporters' source.

Those staff were sacked after the spying was made public.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/contempt-popular-chinese-social-media-platform-wechat-refuses-to-front-foreign-interference-probe-after-repeated-requests/news-story/5aa4854df7d668a5fa63f6c5d6db83e7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj5XHzoUu38

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160178

File: f5e49012c34b323⋯.jpg (1.56 MB,3656x2437,3656:2437,Stella_Assange_at_a_rally_….jpg)

>>18934224

Julian Assange’s wife coy on plea deal: ‘The priority is for him to be freed’

Latika Bourke - July 11, 2023

Brussels: Julian Assange’s wife and chief campaigner, Stella Assange, has not ruled out her husband taking a plea deal to obtain his freedom, but said their priority remains convincing US President Joe Biden to drop the case against the WikiLeaks founder.

Assange is being detained in Britain’s Belmarsh Prison. The Australian is appealing his extradition to the United States to face charges under the Espionage Act related to the publication of hundreds of thousands of US diplomatic, defence and intelligence cables.

Assange argues he is a whistleblower and is the victim of a political prosecution initiated by the former Trump administration.

The election of Biden to the White House and Anthony Albanese in Australia had sparked hopes among Assange’s supporters that the case, being prosecuted by the independent Department of Justice, could be abandoned.

However, despite Albanese’s direct lobbying to Biden, this has not eventuated and in May, the prime minister said Assange himself needed to be part of the solution to resolve his case, signalling that the 52-year-old may have to accept a plea deal to obtain freedom.

Asked if that was something they were considering, Stella Assange did not rule out the possibility but argued that the case should be dropped.

“Look I’m not going to discuss the range of topics or rumours that are flying about,” she said.

“The priority is for him to be freed.

“Julian could have a catastrophic health incident any moment and he has been in a high-security prison for four years and three months and this is indefinite.

“The priority here is for all the people who are involved, and this is a political case that involves the Australian government, to come together and find a solution to free him.”

Stella Assange married Julian Assange in a ceremony at Belmarsh prison in March 2022. The couple have two sons that Julian secretly fathered when he was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy for seven years where he sought asylum to evade extradition to Sweden where he was wanted for questioning over sexual assault allegations.

He was eventually kicked out by his hosts and arrested by British police. He has been in custody ever since while his extradition to the US is sought.

When asked if her husband would be willing to give up accessing the internet as a condition for living in Australia, Stella Assange said their priority was to live as a family.

“WikiLeaks’ legacy is there to stay,” she said.

“Julian is more than what he has done, Julian’s a man that needs to be able to live his life.

“And that’s my priority, that’s our priority, we need to be able to be a family and all these considerations that the question refers to, I don’t think they’re relevant because we’re just talking about a man that needs to be able to regain his freedom and his life back.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/julian-assange-s-wife-stella-coy-on-plea-deal-20230711-p5dn84.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160207

File: 524ef322c31426a⋯.jpg (183.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,An_RAAF_E_7A_Wedgetail_air….jpg)

File: b64d7ad6add489e⋯.jpg (263.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,German_Chancellor_Olaf_Sch….jpg)

>>19075501

>>19154758

NATO summit: Australian eyes in the sky join fight for Ukraine

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - JULY 11, 2023

1/2

Australia will send one of its most sophisticated surveillance planes – the Royal Australian Air Force E-7A Wedgetail aircraft – to ­Europe for six months to help ­protect key wartime logistics hubs, in a significant step up of assistance to Ukraine.

The deployment of the Wedgetail will help protect the uninterrupted delivery of key military and ­humanitarian assets into Ukraine via Poland and other neighbouring countries.

As many as 100 Australian military personnel will be based in Germany, from where the plane will operate, for the six months to fly and service it.

The Australian government said in a statement: “Along with ongoing military and humanitarian assistance support, this ­deployment reinforces that Australia remains a key partner in international endeavours to assist Ukraine repel Russia’s illegal and immoral attack. This deployment will help to ensure the continued and uninterrupted flow of military and ­humanitarian assistance into Ukraine.”

The plane, which can be ­refuelled mid-air, has the capacity to conduct 13- to 17-hour missions. It will be used as part of the Western coalition’s ­Operation Kudu and will operate in European airspace. Officials confirmed it will not operate over Ukraine.

But the aircraft’s highly sophisticated radars and electronic warfare self-protection measures means Australia could be intimately involved in co-ordinating weaponry and other deliveries into Ukraine.

The RAAF says the E-7A Wedgetail is one of the most ­advanced airspace battle management capabilities in the world, with an “ability to co-ordinate a joint air, sea and land battle in real time”.

The deployment of the Wedgetail, one of six operated by the No.2 Squadron at Williamtown, NSW, ramps up Australia’s contribution to Ukraine, which has previously been limited to supplying various vehicles and ammunition.

In a new move to put Australian personnel in Europe to help the Ukraine war effort, Anthony Albanese announced that up to 100 Australian personnel will be positioned at the Ramstein air base in Germany to crew and support the Wedgetail early warning plane.

“It’s important the democratic world can react to defend the rules-based order, it is significant for it will do but also for what it symbolises,” Mr Albanese said, adding that the message was that “Australia’s commitment to doing what we can, which will provide appropriate resources to maximise impact of Australia’s contribution to support the integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine”.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said he was “really moved” by Australia’s latest contribution.

“We are delighted about this massive support made by many countries who are not immediate neighbours or members of the European Union. We are partners in our different international forums and I am really moved and this is a very important step and a good one.”

Both leaders were asked about the appropriateness of the US suppling cluster bombs for use by Ukraine but they declined to comment on the controversial decision.

Mr Scholz said Germany was a signatory of the UN convention on cluster munitions and they would not be supplying any such weapons, and he stressed Germany wouldn’t comment on the US decision.

“For us we we will not make such deliveries because we have made this commitment (to the UN) and I won’t comment on this American decision,’’ he said.

Mr Albanese said he agreed with Mr Scholz’s comments about what other nations may do, saying “Australia is also a signatory (of the UN convention): we don’t have such weapons and we don’t intend to change that position.”

Mr Albanese will attend the two-day NATO summit in ­Vilnius, Lithuania, on Tuesday and Wednesday as part of the “Indo-Pacific Four” alongside Japan, New Zealand and South Korea to discuss security issues across both Europe and the Indo-Pacific. He hopes to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the summit.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160210

File: 1ebb4ce6326dc8e⋯.jpg (212.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,German_Chancellor_Olaf_Sch….jpg)

>>19160207

2/2

Last month the Albanese government pledged a fresh round of $110m in support for Ukraine. It comprised 70 military vehicles, including 28 M113 armoured vehicles, 14 special operations ­vehicles, 28 MAN 40M medium trucks and 14 trailers; and a fresh supply of 105mm artillery ammunition.

However, the 31 member countries of NATO, and others, will be asked for further contributions as the Ukrainian offensive continues to progress more slowly than ­expected.

Mr Albanese on Monday ­rejected the claim by former Labor prime minister Paul Keating that NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg was a “supreme fool” over his comments comparing China’s ambitions to Russia. Mr Albanese said “Jens Stoltenberg is a friend of ­Australia”.

“We need to remember the role that NATO is playing: there is a land war in Europe,” Mr Albanese said at a media conference in front of the Brandenburg Gate – the iconic symbol of Cold War ­divisions. “This is a war about the international rule of law, about whether a large nation can seek to impose its will on a smaller nation. This is about national sovereignty. This is about the people of Ukraine, struggling to defend their democracy and their sovereignty.

“And Australia stands with the people and government of Ukraine. But we also support the extraordinary effort that NATO is showing, because this is a struggle.

“That it has implications for the whole world. I’m looking forward to my constructive engagement with NATO.”

Mr Albanese met Mr Scholz in Berlin on Monday night at the German Chanchellery.

Their two-hour talks coincided with the announcement of the deployment of 240 German paratroopers and marines to Australia for Exercise Talisman Sabre, which involves Australia and the US alongside troops from Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Britain and Canada.

The involvement of 170 German paratroopers and 40 German marines is a big step up from previous engagements and signifies Germany’s interest and concern about China’s moves in the Indo-Pacific region.

German army chief Alfons Mais said the Indo-Pacific region was of extremely high importance in Germany and the European Union due to economic interdependencies.

Mr Scholz also formally invited Australia to join the Climate Club in recognition of Australia’s aggressive carbon emissions targets. The Climate Club was formed by G7 countries late last year and is led by Germany, which is trying to decarbonise and find other sources of energy away from Russian oil and gas. The club is working to ensure an international standard of conditions for the decarbonisation of industry, investment in sustainable industrial technologies and expand “green” energy, including green hydrogen.

“I see enormous opportunity for Australia to benefit from the shift to clean energy that’s occurring, including in countries like Germany,” Mr Albanese said.

“We know that there has already been substantial discussions between the private sector in Australia with their counterparts here in Germany, looking at the transition and the opportunity that it creates in green hydrogen and in other new industries.”

Australia’s admission to the club is a recognition by others that Australia is aggressively seeking to reduce emissions and can help with the EU climate standards when it comes to trade.

That comes as the ailing Australian-EU free trade deal talks – bogged down in France and Ireland agribusiness protections – will be ramped up in Brussels later this week.

Mr Albanese said Mr Scholz had been a “huge supporter” of the yet-to-be signed free-trade agreement between Australia and the EU after signing a $1bn deal for more than 100 Boxer heavy weapon carriers that will be built in Queensland by German company Rheinmetall, which employs 1000 people locally. Mr Albanese also invited Mr Scholz to visit Australia next year.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/nato-summit-australian-eyes-inthe-sky-join-fightfor-ukraine/news-story/f89eccf95253a138d1978ae6fcdb9b69

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160231

File: 225d812e3bb27ee⋯.jpg (4.39 MB,5184x3456,3:2,Ben_Roberts_Smith_at_Perth….jpg)

>>18934029

Ben Roberts-Smith appeals major defamation loss

Max Mason - Jul 11, 2023

Disgraced soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has launched an appeal of the judgment in his failed defamation action against The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times, which ruled he is a war criminal, murderer and a bully.

Justice Anthony Besanko’s decision last month found the newspapers had proven Mr Roberts-Smith broke the rules of war and disgraced his country and the army by his conduct in Afghanistan. Mr Roberts-Smith did not attend court when the judgment was handed down in Sydney last month, and was photographed holidaying in Bali.

On Tuesday Mr Roberts-Smith filed a notice of appeal in the Federal Court. Billionaire Kerry Stokes funded Mr Roberts-Smith’s legal case, and employed him at Seven West Media. Mr Roberts-Smith resigned from Seven the day after Justice Besanko’s ruling.

Nine Entertainment, the owner of the Herald and the Age, is pursuing Mr Stokes’ private company, Australia Capital Equity, for costs, which could top $35 million, after discovering a funding agreement with Mr Roberts-Smith during the legal proceedings.

A spokesman for Mr Stokes was contacted for comment. Mr Roberts-Smith’s legal team was contacted for comment.

Nine managing director of publishing James Chessell said: “We believe the Federal Court’s judgment is comprehensive and categorical. The appeal will be opposed. We will always stand up for journalism that is in the public interest.”

According to the notice, Mr Roberts-Smith is appealing on the grounds that Justice Besanko erred in finding the former soldier ordered executions and murdered Afghans. This includes the finding that he kicked an unarmed Afghan civilian off a cliff in 2012 and ordered his execution, as well as killing an elderly Afghan in 2009 with a machine gun.

Justice Besanko considered 110 days of evidence and heard from 41 witnesses in a trial that lasted more than a year after being interrupted by COVID-19 lockdowns. It finished in July 2022.

Mr Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, sued the three newspapers over 2018 articles by Nick McKenzie, Chris Masters and David Wroe that alleged he committed murder during deployments to Afghanistan.

Mr Roberts-Smith denied the allegations; the newspapers defended the defamation case on the basis of truth. To fight the defamation claim, the media outlets alleged that Mr Roberts-Smith murdered six Afghans, pressured his comrades to murder, deliberately concealed evidence from the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force, and threatened potential witnesses.

During the hearings, the newspapers acknowledged they could not prove one alleged murder because a soldier would not give evidence on the grounds it might incriminate him.

In ruling in favour of the newspapers, Justice Besanko found Mr Roberts-Smith murdered, or was complicit in the murder of, four unarmed prisoners, assaulted unarmed prisoners and bullied a fellow soldier.

One of those murders was a handcuffed, unarmed and defenceless Afghan civilian, Ali Jan, in 2012. The judge found Mr Roberts-Smith kicked him off a cliff and told soldiers under his command to shoot him.

Mr Roberts-Smith denied wrongdoing, claiming the man was not a villager, but a spotter reporting coalition troop movements to the Taliban.

The judge also found the newspapers proved Mr Roberts-Smith committed another murder on Easter Sunday in 2009, by pressuring a newly deployed Special Air Services Regiment rookie to shoot an elderly unarmed Afghan at a compound known as Whiskey 108.

The third murder was on the same day, where he picked up a man with a prosthetic leg and used a machine gun to shoot him up to 15 times.

Both men were found hiding in a tunnel. Mr Roberts-Smith denied the murders, saying the men were insurgent soldiers and were killed lawfully.

Justice Besanko also found the newspapers had proven Mr Roberts-Smith “engaged in a campaign of bullying against a small and quiet soldier called Trooper M, which included threats of violence”.

https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/ben-roberts-smith-appeals-major-defamation-loss-20230711-p5dnfw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160241

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Major changes to abortion access as all doctors and nurse practitioners can prescribe

ELLEN RANSLEY - JULY 11, 2023

All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it as new rules are brought in.

Until now, prescribers and dispensers of the two-part medical abortion treatment needed extra certification or registration, meaning only about 10 per cent of doctors and 30 per cent of pharmacists are currently able to deal with the pill.

But from August 1, restrictions around the MS-2 Step will be removed, in a move the government says will “improve equitable access to healthcare for all Australians”.

Nurse practitioners – who represent about one per cent of nurses – will also be able to prescribe the medications under the PBS.

The changes follow an application from MS Health to the Therapeutic Goods Administration. The pill, known as RU486 overseas, was first registered by the TGA a decade ago for use on pregnant women up to nine weeks gestation.

Assistant Health Minister Ged Kearney said it was a “very safe, very practical move” that met global guidelines.

She said the government supported the move because it had “no higher priority” than strengthening primary care.

“We know that women experience structural barriers trying to access the healthcare that they need, particularly in regional and rural areas,” she said.

“That’s why it’s so important that all health practitioners can perform the care that they are already trained to provide.

“These changes recognise the importance of health practitioners than women see regularly – their GP, their nurse practitioner, and their community pharmacist.”

The abortion pill was first approved for use in Australia in 2006, but it wasn’t until 2012 that medical abortions became more widely available.

The Royal Australian College of GPs has welcomed the changes, which they say will particularly benefit women in rural and remote communities.

RACGP President Dr Nicole Higgins said it was a “huge step forward” to improve access to holistic reproductive care.

“As a GP in a regional centre, I know all too well that there are significant barriers to reproductive care in rural and remote areas. These services are vital, and they must be affordable and accessible for everyone who needs them,” she said.

“The TGA’s changes will enable greater access to medical abortion for women throughout Australia and will reduce unnecessary red tape for the GPs who provide these essential services.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/major-changes-to-abortion-access-as-all-doctors-and-nurse-practitioners-can-prescribe/news-story/d47d7ceac23359273d968242abad05de

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KjlVE7JRBw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19160276

File: 37f61cb0e2c412c⋯.jpg (447.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_abortion_drug_Mifepris….jpg)

File: ac2cdc86321bb05⋯.jpg (241.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 351585bed6671eb⋯.jpg (766.79 KB,852x1369,852:1369,Q_3405.jpg)

File: ebcbea5489ab504⋯.jpg (103.12 KB,720x960,3:4,D_IIQN1WkAAgZT_.jpg)

>>19160241

What is abortion drug mifepristone MS 2-Step and who will be able to prescribe it under new access rules in Australia?

THE AUSTRALIAN - JULY 11, 2023

Major changes to abortion access in Australia will take effect from August 1, with all doctors and nurse practitioners to be authorised to prescribe them. Here’s everything you need to know:

What is the abortion pill MS-2 Step?

Mifepristone is one component of a two-drug regimen that can be used in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. The pill, known as RU486 overseas, was first registered by the Therapeutic Goods Administration a decade ago for use on pregnant women up to nine weeks gestation. In the US, where mifepristone was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2000, the drug accounts for more than half the abortions there and has become the centrepiece of the country’s latest clash over women’s reproductive freedom.

When do the abortion pill changes take effect?

From August 1, all doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it. Nurse practitioners – who represent about one per cent of nurses – will also be able to prescribe the medications under the PBS.

Who has prescribed abortion pills up until now?

Currently, medical abortions can be performed by doctors in the first nine weeks of pregnancy, with less than 10 per cent of Australian GPs registered to prescribe the two courses of pills, containing misoprostol and mifepristone (RU486). Until now, prescribers and dispensers of the two-part medical abortion treatment needed extra certification or registration, meaning only about 30 per cent of pharmacists are currently able to deal with the pill.

How much do abortion drugs cost?

Medical abortion medication costs $42.50 under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. However, MSI Australia estimates women can face out-of-pocket costs of more than $350.

What is MS Health?

MS Health is a not-for-profit subsidiary of MSI Australia, the leading provider of abortion services. MS Health has overseen the import, distribution and management of abortion pills since 2012. In 2022 it applied to the Therapeutic Goods Administration to update who had the right to administer terminations, pushing for nurses to hand out the pills.

MS Health’s Operations Manager Adam Pirie told The Australian he wanted to make abortion pills more accessible for women, particularly in regional and remote areas.

“The Risk Management Plan currently in place for MS two-Step only allows certified doctors to prescribe the medical abortion pills,” Mr Pirie said.

“We are preparing a TGA application to update the plan to widen the definition of who can prescribe the medication. “Effectively, we will be removing one roadblock that prevents nurses, midwives and other healthcare practitioners from prescribing the medical abortion pills. It will then be up to states and territories, and various regulatory bodies to define who can administer the medication.”

What has been the government’s response?

The Albanese government said at the time it would welcome any proposals to make abortion more accessible, amid a push to set a national standard for ending pregnancies across the states. Assistant Health Minister Ged Kearney, a former nurse, said in July last year the government had not been formally approached by MS Health but she “would welcome applications to the TGA and the PBAC that seek to remove barriers to access”.

“In light of Roe vs Wade and the changing of abortion rights in the US, I know many Australian women are concerned about access to termination,” Ms Kearney told The Australian.

“Access to affordable termination is a crucial part of healthcare for women.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/what-is-abortion-drug-mifepristone-ms-2step-and-who-will-be-able-to-prescribe-it-under-new-access-rules-in-australia/news-story/472d7e4fee496bd0ae8896cc76064bde

Q Post #3405

Jul 10 2019 12:03:12 (EST)

Reality is hard to swallow.

FAKE NEWS keeps you asleep (sheep) and fixed in a pre_designed false reality (narrative).

Google altering search results to 'support' the pre_designed narrative and 'prevent' (make harder) for one to learn the TRUTH?

Those (w/ influence) who challenge the narrative are banned, shunned, threatened………

[Planned Parenthood is GOOD]_narrative

[China is NOT a threat]_narrative

Do you know the market price for a fetus?

Correlation of market price & days old of fetus/baby?

As age (days) increases so does the value?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-to-vote-on-born-alive-bill-to-protect-infants-who-survive-a-failed-abortion

D's block 'born alive' bill?

Planned Parenthood political donations?

What party?

Do you believe this has anything to do w/ a Woman's Right to Choose?

Welcome to the Real World.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3405

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165614

File: f01fabcb32d8b5d⋯.jpg (4.23 MB,5078x3385,5078:3385,Labor_MP_Bennelong_Jerome_….jpg)

>>18928670

>>18965852

Labor MP scolded for spruiking Voice at ‘politically neutral’ citizenship ceremony

Lisa Visentin - July 12, 2023

Federal Labor MP Jerome Laxale says he will not shy away from using council citizenship ceremonies to detail his reasons for voting Yes in the upcoming Voice referendum, after a Liberal-led Sydney council alleged it had received complaints that he was politicising the events.

In a speech at a ceremony held by Ryde Council last Thursday, the Bennelong MP – a former Ryde Council mayor – urged a new cohort of Australian citizens to “do your research” about the referendum, which he referred to as a “simple offer” and an “opportunity that was too important to waste”.

A video of the ceremony on July 6, shows Laxale telling the crowd the referendum was “about recognition and consultation”, adding it was his view that Australia’s history “didn’t start in 1788, ” and as a “sign of reconciliation and as a sign of maturity … we should first consult with [Indigenous Australians] on laws that impact them directly”.

“If you will do your research, and think as I do, then perhaps we will have our ninth successful referendum,” Laxale said.

The Coalition’s federal immigration spokesman Dan Tehan said the federal government’s Australian Citizenship Ceremonies Code made it “very clear” that ceremonies should be apolitical and bipartisan.

“This is just plain wrong. New citizens shouldn’t be told how to think and how to vote by the government on their first day as an Australian,” he said.

Tehan alleged it was the second time federal Labor MPs had used the ceremonies to “promote their own political agenda”, and urged Immigration Minister Andrew Giles to “give clear direction to his colleagues that this is completely unacceptable”.

In June, Melbourne’s Glen Eira City Council acting chief executive Ron Torres told 3AW that Higgins MP Dr Michelle Ananda-Rajah had encouraged new citizens to vote Yes at a recent ceremony.

Giles did not respond directly to questions about whether it was appropriate for MPs to detail their personal views on the Voice referendum at citizenship ceremonies. Instead, a spokeswoman noted the code required that the ceremonies “be designed to impress upon conferees the responsibilities and privileges of Australian citizenship” and “must be non-commercial, apolitical, bipartisan and secular”.

Laxale’s speech, which coincided with NAIDOC week celebrations, came two weeks after council chief executive Wayne Rylands wrote to him, saying “concerns have been raised” about Laxale’s peeches at previous ceremonies “where you have included … a suggestion that all new citizens should be voting ‘yes’ to the upcoming referendum”.

Rylands also referred Laxale to the code, which states the events “must not be used as forums for political, partisan or religious expression, for the distribution of political material or the sale of souvenirs”.

Ryde’s Liberal Mayor Sarkis Yedelian said that following a citizenship ceremony in May, one new citizen had contacted him via text message to complain that Laxale had made a “partisan speech” and a “few people” had complained to him in person. This masthead has seen a copy of the text, but the name of the sender was redacted, so it cannot be verified.

Yedelian, who presided over the May ceremony, accused Laxale of using the speech to “very explicitly” promote a Yes vote, and informed the chief executive of the complaint. Yedelian said he was not concerned by Laxale’s latest speech, because his comments were clearly signposted as his personal views, but added that he did not believe it was the council’s role to pick a side in the referendum.

But Laxale disputed Yedelian’s version of events, saying he had always framed his speeches at the ceremonies in terms of “this is why I’m voting Yes”, and accused the Liberal-dominated council of trying “to silence conversations about the Voice”.

“The Liberals failed to support motions to advocate for a Yes vote in May. Then they tried to bully their federal MPs into not talking about the referendum. These two are linked,” Laxale said.

“I will continue to encourage people to participate fully in this process and share my reasons for voting Yes.”

Ryde Council declined to say whether it had received complaints in addition to the one referred to it by the mayor.

“As chief executive officer of City of Ryde I will not be commenting on views expressed by any individuals about the referendum,” Rylands said in a statement.

At a council meeting in May, the Liberals used their numbers to block a Labor motion urging the mayor to sign a declaration endorsing the Uluru Statement from the Heart, alongside 38 other mayors from around Australia.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/labor-mp-scolded-for-spruiking-voice-at-politically-neutral-citizenship-ceremony-20230711-p5dndg.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165622

File: 6a95a66a10c62dd⋯.jpg (1.18 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Fiona_Stanley_says_there_w….jpg)

File: 8b3a25d59ebf1fc⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Professor_Stanley_spoke_at….jpg)

File: d939b48d6ac98ef⋯.jpg (280.67 KB,1782x1073,1782:1073,Dorinda_Cox_says_conflatin….jpg)

>>18928670

>>19075409

Indigenous community's handling of COVID shows why Voice to Parliament needed, Fiona Stanley says

Daryna Zadvirna - 12 July 2023

1/2

Former Australian of the Year Fiona Stanley believes Aboriginal people had the best response to COVID-19 "in the world", and says it proves an Indigenous Voice to Parliament will improve health outcomes for First Nations people.

Speaking at a panel discussion in support of the Voice on Monday evening, the epidemiologist noted for her public health work, said there was evidence showing the Voice referendum would make a significant difference to Indigenous people's lives.

Professor Stanley said contrary to expectation, there were significantly fewer COVID-19 cases among Indigenous Australians compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts at the start of the pandemic.

"We would have anticipated because of the high risks of Aboriginal people — chronic disease, overcrowded conditions, and most Aboriginal people actually live in cities, only 18 per cent live in remote communities – they were of high risk [of contracting the virus]," she said.

"Well, within the first 18 to 20 months of the pandemic, Aboriginal people had six times fewer cases than non-Indigenous people did. How did they do it? They had a voice.

"They had a Voice in the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation. They had a Voice at all state and territory organisations right down to communities."

Professor Stanley told the event in Perth that the relatively small number of COVID-19 cases among Indigenous Australians was the result of the high level of input and self-determination in health responses during the pandemic.

"The Aboriginal response to the pandemic was the best in the world," she said.

"And it is the best example of why a Voice is going to make such a difference."

Professor Stanley was a panellist at the pro-Voice event, along with former High Court chief justice Robert French and author Thomas Mayo.

Debate reminiscent of Mabo: Dorinda Cox

Speaking earlier on Monday at a media event in Perth as part of the Yes campaign, WA senator Dorinda Cox said attempts to use new heritage laws as a tool to oppose the Voice were reminiscent of Australians being warned they would "lose their backyards" over the Mabo decision.

She echoed concerns raised by former WA Aboriginal affairs minister Ben Wyatt that the state's controversial new Aboriginal heritage laws were being used as a weapon against the referendum.

"I think what needs to be stopped is the scaremongering and putting those two things together [is] enabling a conversation that is destructive," Senator Cox said.

"We already know the Yes campaign have the hardest job … to convince Australians that this is something that is worthwhile for the future.

"I think putting those two things together is what we saw in the days of the Mabo decision, that people would lose their backyards. And we don't want to go back to that, that's part of history.

"What we want to do is look forward to what we see as a reconciled Australia."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165623

File: 7871f77b6b301d7⋯.jpg (206.88 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Patrick_Gorman_says_the_Vo….jpg)

File: 64893c5f9dff786⋯.jpg (285.11 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Megan_Krakouer_says_there_….jpg)

>>19165622

2/2

Bigger for WA than GST, declares Patrick Gorman

Federal MP for Perth Patrick Gorman said constitutional recognition was more significant for West Australians than the GST.

"This is bigger than the GST because it is about something for the next generation, it's about bringing people together, it's about closing that gap that for too long we have not been able to close in doing things the same way year in, year out."

Australians will vote later this year on whether or not to enshrine an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in the constitution.

The Voice would be an independent body advising parliament and government about matters that affect the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.

It would only provide advice and would have no authority to overrule parliament.

Some common suggestions in opposition to the Voice were that it would be divisive, that the proposal lacks clarity, and it would not have any real impact.

Voice has no 'teeth', No campaigner says

Indigenous activist Megan Krakouer is firmly in the No camp, and believes the Voice does not go far enough to achieve social reform.

"I want to see something that has teeth in it, that can actually compel the social reforms that are much needed," she said.

Ms Krakouer labelled comments on the heritage laws as a distraction that muddied the waters around the Voice proposal.

"There's enough confusion as to what the Voice means at this point and what it looks like," she said.

"I have people saying, 'I don't know what the Voice is, is that John Farnham The Voice, is that the TV show The Voice?'"

In a sign of how crucial WA's vote is in the referendum, Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney will on Monday begin a tour of regional WA to drum up support for the change.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-11/covid-response-shows-indigenous-voice-needed-fiona-stanley-says/102582244

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165628

File: 0bc89cf45cdcee2⋯.jpg (178.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Julian_Assange_s_wife_Stel….jpg)

>>18934224

Julian Assange’s wife in clemency plea to Joe Biden

AFP - JULY 11, 2023

The wife of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is petitioning the British government’s decision to extradite him to the US, has appealed for clemency to President Joe Biden.

The Australian publisher is the object of a US extradition request to face trial for divulging US military secrets about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Biden could end this any time. It’s not in the administration’s interests for Julian to be tried during an election period,” Stella Assange said while speaking to the Geneva Press Club.

“The UK is … giving off the signals that it is kind of accelerating and wants Julian extradited. So Julian could very well be extradited by the end of the summer. The Biden administration would have to deal with that and I don’t think that’s in their interest.”

Assange, 52, is being prosecuted in the US for having published 700,000 confidential documents related to US military and diplomatic activities, starting in 2010.

He could face decades in prison, and his supporters portray him as a martyr for press freedom.

Assange was arrested by British police in 2019 after spending seven years holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he faced accusations of sexual assault.

He has been held for the past four years in Belmarsh, in east London.

“The smart thing” for Mr Biden to do “would be to just stop it and end it”, Ms Assange said.

The issue of the extradition was “a Trump-era legacy” and represented “a threat” for democracy and the press, she said.

The British government agreed last year to his extradition but Assange appealed. His wife said the appeal was rejected about a month ago but a new petition for review had been filed.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/julian-assanges-wife-in-clemency-plea-to-joe-biden/news-story/51ccc9c8fe34b5cc0ed113f606e1b1c8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165653

File: bb73f91a143a90d⋯.jpg (18.58 KB,650x366,325:183,Chinese_media_have_fawned_….jpg)

File: bb9ea13381d8d40⋯.jpg (34.88 KB,650x366,325:183,Former_Labor_prime_ministe….jpg)

>>19154732

'Visionary and insightful politician': Chinese media fawns over Paul Keating's criticism of NATO, saying he 'hit the nail on the head'

Chinese state media has fawned over former Australian prime minister Paul Keating, labelling him a "visionary and insightful politician" for his blistering attack on NATO and the alliance's secretary-general.

Adriana Mageros - July 12, 2023

Chinese media have fawned over former Labor prime minister Paul Keating for his harsh criticism of NATO and its Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.

Mr Keating launched a blistering attack on the NATO chief on Sunday, calling him a "supreme fool" for looking to foster deeper connections with Asia as China's dominance grows.

The former prime minister, who has continued to defend China's military rise, further accused Mr Stoltenberg of attempting to export "malicious poison" to Asia.

China's Global Times, a tabloid newspaper owned by the Chinese Communist Party, published an opinion piece on Tuesday fawning over Mr Keating's remarks.

The 800-word article praised the former prime minister for condemning NATO and its Secretary General "without reservation".

"Keating is a visionary and insightful politician. We highly agree with his statement. No one has criticized NATO more accurately and vividly than Keating," the article read.

"His words reflect a consensus among Asian countries.

"The transatlantic military alliance, which has been expanding and disrupting the security situation in Europe since the Cold War, is now extending its reach into the Asia-Pacific region.

"Its ulterior motives are well-known in the international community.

"Inciting division and hatred, creating group confrontations, and causing chaos in Europe, they now seek to disrupt the peace in the Asia-Pacific region.

"We firmly resist this, together with the majority of countries in the Asia-Pacific region."

In a scathing statement on Sunday, Mr Keating said Mr Stoltenberg’s insistence on expanding ties with Asia could risk spreading the “militarism of Europe” to the east.

"The Europeans have been fighting each other for the better part of 300 years, including giving the rest of us two world wars in the last hundred," Mr Keating said.

"Exporting that malicious poison to Asia would be akin to Asia welcoming the plague upon itself."

China's Global Times believed Mr Keating "hit the nail on the head" with his comments.

The editorial, headlined "Two stern warnings must be given to the arrogant NATO: Global Times editorial", went on to explore key topics discussed at the summit in Lithuania.

These included NATO's plans to counter threats posed by Russia and Ukraine's bid to join the military bloc.

The story by local media also touched on NATO deepening cooperation with the Asia-Pacific Four partners; Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.

China's Global Times issued two warnings for NATO which it said was becoming "more ambitious and aggressive".

"Firstly, NATO must restrain rather than indulge its own impulse to expand, position itself correctly, and never cross the line; secondly, NATO must respect the legitimate security concerns and interest demands of major countries in the region, rather than offend and provoke them," it read.

"Otherwise, it will lead to disastrous consequences. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is a lesson."

Mr Keating slammed Mr Stoltenberg for comparing China to Russia and accused him of being in the pocket of the United States.

“Of all the people on the international stage the supreme fool among them is Jens Stoltenberg, the current Secretary-General of NATO… Stoltenberg by instinct and by policy, is simply an accident on its way to happen,” he said on Sunday.

“Stoltenberg, in his jaundiced view, overlooks the fact that China represents twenty per cent of humanity and now possesses the largest economy in the world. And has no record of attacking other states, unlike the United States, whose bidding Stoltenberg is happy to do.

Mr Keating also criticised Mr Stoltenberg for his push to open a liaison office in Japan to help in coordinating with the AP4 (Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Japan) in response to challenges posed by China in the Indo-Pacific.

https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/visionary-and-insightful-politician-chinese-media-fawns-over-paul-keatings-criticism-of-nato-saying-he-hit-the-nail-on-the-head/news-story/24c8b826a3bbb0c7b406dc29622d8fa9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165662

File: c133c14e4e455bf⋯.jpg (340.81 KB,1200x720,5:3,Two_stern_warnings_must_be….jpg)

>>19154732

>>19165653

Two stern warnings must be given to the arrogant NATO: Global Times editorial

Global Times - Jul 11, 2023

1/2

The NATO summit is being held in Vilnius, Lithuania, from Tuesday to Thursday. The meeting focuses on plans to "counter the threat" from Russia, including discussions on NATO's expansion and Ukraine's future membership to NATO. Meanwhile, NATO's strategic impulse to meddle in the Asia-Pacific region is also imminent at this summit. Expanding cooperation with the four "Asia-Pacific partners" - Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand - is another major topic of the summit. In this regard, the US media boldly stated that NATO is trying to "deter China's strategic ambitions."

This is the second year that Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand have been invited to the NATO summit. In order to firmly rope in these four countries, NATO imitated the "Quad" mechanism of the US, Japan, India and Australia at last year's summit, and specially created a new name for these four countries called "Asia-Pacific Four (AP4)." This aims to institutionalize the cooperation between these four countries and NATO, and make them de facto new allies of "NATO+" in the Asia-Pacific region. According to sources, the joint statement to be issued in Vilnius will change the name of AP4 to "Indo-Pacific Four (IP4)," which is undoubtedly more in line with Washington's tone.

There are 31 NATO members, but they have never been monolithic and have different views on many international issues. However, they are in general dominated by the will of the US. Now they have been kidnapped by the panic and tension instigated by the US, becoming "Washington's axe, spears and shovels." Wherever NATO goes, wars are likely to break out. These are not only the subjective impressions left by NATO, but also objective facts to a large extent. This situation is actually more worthy of the high vigilance of those member states within NATO that have no intention of being passively involved in the war.

The outbreak and prolongation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, along with the chaos and changes in the world, have given NATO, which was once on the verge of brain death, an opportunity to breathe and extend its existence. However, it has also led NATO to make highly erroneous conclusions and judgments, resulting in an unprecedented expansion of its geopolitical ambitions after the Cold War, as evidenced by the NATO summit in Vilnius.

At the Vilnius summit, we saw NATO become more ambitious and aggressive. When NATO is being arrogant, we must sternly warn it of two points: Firstly, NATO must restrain rather than indulge its own impulse to expand, position itself correctly, and never cross the line; secondly, NATO must respect the legitimate security concerns and interest demands of major countries in the region, rather than offend and provoke them. Otherwise, it will lead to disastrous consequences. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is a lesson. If NATO does not restrain itself but even aggravates its actions, more serious consequences will follow.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165664

File: 1a6d2a64d71544a⋯.jpg (119 KB,1200x720,5:3,NATO_sees_itself_as_cheerl….jpg)

>>19165662

2/2

To put it more directly, NATO must promptly withdraw the black hand it has extended toward the Asia-Pacific region, and it should not even think about squeezing half of its body in the future. Apart from certain countries like Japan, which act out of dark selfish motives rather than considering the overall interests of Asia, the majority of countries in Asia not only do not welcome NATO but also see it as a terrible monster that should be avoided at all costs. This is because NATO only brings security risks, war threats, and development predicament to Asia.

Former Australian prime minister Paul Keating recently issued a statement, criticizing NATO and its Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg without reservation. He hit the nail on the head, saying "The Europeans have been fighting each other for the better part of 300 years, including giving the rest of us two world wars in the last hundred. Exporting that malicious poison to Asia would be akin to Asia welcoming the plague upon itself." He also called Stoltenberg, who exaggerates the China threat, a "supreme fool" who "conducts himself as an American agent more than he performs as a leader and spokesperson for European security."

Keating is a visionary and insightful politician. We highly agree with his statement. No one has criticized NATO more accurately and vividly than Keating. His words reflect a consensus among Asian countries. The transatlantic military alliance, which has been expanding and disrupting the security situation in Europe since the Cold War, is now extending its reach into the Asia-Pacific region. Its ulterior motives are well-known in the international community. Inciting division and hatred, creating group confrontations, and causing chaos in Europe, they now seek to disrupt the peace in the Asia-Pacific region. We firmly resist this, together with the majority of countries in the Asia-Pacific region.

Japan, disregarding strong opposition from its neighbors, is stubbornly pushing its plan to dump nuclear-contaminated wastewater into the ocean. Now it is persistently introducing NATO's military and political troubles into Asia, which could be seen as Japan's second betrayal and crime against Asia after its fascist aggression. If there are consequences, Japan bears an undeniable historical responsibility. Given this, it is not excessive no matter how we condemn Japan.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1294186.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165673

File: 25b6aa8475e9e5a⋯.jpg (224.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19154732

NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg shakes off criticism, and praises Australia

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - JULY 12, 2023

Jens Stoltenberg has brushed off “supreme fool” criticisms of his leadership of the NATO alliance as Anthony Albanese emphasised that Australia would be engaged in supporting the alliance’s efforts in Ukraine “for as long as necessary and to the best of our capacity’’.

Australia has deepened its partnership with NATO countries – now numbering 32 after Sweden has been admitted as a member – in areas of cyber and hybrid warfare.

Mr Stoltenberg said Australia’s involvement in the NATO ­alliance was “really valued” ­because regional security was global. “What happens in the Indo-Pacific region matters for NATO, what happens in Europe matters in the Asia Pacific,’’ he said, stressing that the Russian invasion of Ukraine had global ­implications.

“We are extremely grateful for Australia’s strong support of Ukraine; it really makes a difference every day,’’ he said.

Mr Stoltenberg showed no agitation about the remarks of former prime minister Paul Keating, who criticised him for trying to set up a NATO office in the Indo-Pacific in what he ­ perceived as an anti-China ­manoeuvre.

“Of all the people on the international stage, the supreme fool among them is Jens Stoltenberg. Stoltenberg by instinct and by policy is simply an accident on its way to happen.” Mr Keating had said.

The Prime Minister countered that view with an effusive welcome to Mr Stoltenberg at the opening of the two-day summit, congratulating him on his reappointment for another year, noting “it is very well deserved”, and on his leadership of NATO and what the alliance was doing to promote regional security.

Mr Albanese said Australia has been impacted by the war in Ukraine as well, despite the geographical distances, particularly in the areas of inflation and the economy, and he reiterated that Australia stood strongly with Ukraine.

He said Australia would continue to work with NATO in areas such as cyber, and he noted that Australia, like NATO, also recognised that climate change was a security threat.

“We will engage for as long as necessary and to the best of our capacity,’’ he vowed.

Several world leaders were due to meet Mr Albanese on the sidelines of the NATO summit, including French President Emmanuel Macron, and the issue of the Australia-EU free-trade deal was expected to be top of the agenda. France is one of several European countries protecting its farming interests, which is blocking any agreement from making progress.

Mr Albanese said Australia was not asking for anything that hadn’t been given to other countries in free-trade deals. “My message to President Macron will be we want to conclude this agreement but we won’t be signing up to things not in Australia’s national interest,” he said.

Within hours of the summit beginning, Mr Macron announced he would provide Ukraine with long-range Scalp missiles.

“I have decided to increase deliveries of weapons and equipment to enable the Ukrainians to have the capacity to strike deeply while keeping our doctrine to allow Ukraine to defend its territory,” said Mr Macron, who is wary of giving Ukraine unfettered membership of the NATO alliance. Instead the US, Britain, France and Germany are pushing for an “Israel-style” security guarantee whereby the four countries will continue to supply arms to Ukraine to defend itself. Talks over the wording and strength of the assurances were continuing on the first day of the summit.

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky expressed fury that Ukraine may not be invited to join NATO, describing the current discussions at the NATO summit as “absurd”.

The Russian ambassador to Belgium Alexander Tokovinin told the Russian news agency RIA that NATO’s embrace of Ukraine increases the risk of direct conflict between NATO members and Moscow. The Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticised France’s offer of the longer-range missiles.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nato-secretary-shakes-off-criticism-praises-australia/news-story/8bbc25ae61427a65e233c8932a357d34

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165707

File: 678a01cb6272278⋯.jpg (212.71 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Albany_Mayor_Dennis_Wellin….jpg)

File: 23f67aeb8cd297d⋯.jpg (205.23 KB,1847x1039,1847:1039,Chinese_Consul_General_Lon….jpg)

China tensions spur council’s sister city fears

A WA town may sever ties with Linyi amid concerns the relationship could lead to ‘influence and interference’.

PAUL GARVEY - July 11, 2023

1/2

A town on Western Australia‘s southern coast will consider severing ties with its Chinese sister city amid concerns from some councillors that the relationship could lead to “influence and interference” in its affairs and “pressures to sovereign integrity”.

City of Albany councillor Thomas Brough will move a motion later this month proposing that the town “respectfully conclude” its sister city relationship with Linyi, in China’s Shandong province.

A report prepared by Dr Brough and distributed to councillors in recent days, and obtained by The Australian, details what he says are the risks presented to Albany as a result of its China relationship.

“China has been engaged in economic warfare with Australia since 2020 and political warfare since the mid 2010s. This form of conflict is unfamiliar to many citizens of Western democracies but will be easily recognisable to those familiar with the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist modus operandi,” the report says. “To effectively counter and defeat CCP influence and interference there is a need to expose such operations to the intense sunlight of public scrutiny.”

Dr Brough’s report said sister city relationships had been used by the Chinese Communist Party to help enable foreign influence.

Albany established its sister city relationship with Linyi – a city of more than 10 million people roughly halfway between Beijing and Shanghai – back in 2014. The relationship, however, had been largely dormant up until a recent meeting between the Albany council and a delegation headed by the Chinese Consul-General of WA, Long Dingbin.

Dr Brough attended that meeting and told The Australian he had emerged with concerns about the issues of interest raised by the Chinese delegation.

The delegation, Dr Brough said, had shown particular interest in Albany’s airport, which is wholly owned by the City of Albany but which is in need of a $30 million upgrade of its tarmac. The visitors also made inquiries about the Chinese-owned Ferngrove Estate winery near Albany, the fish stocks in Albany’s waters, and the region’s minerals potential.

The delegation also presented an invitation to the councillors to visit a food and wine expo in Shandong next month.

Dr Brough, who also works as an emergency department GP and who was formerly an Australian army reservist, said the delegation had pursued a line of questioning including gathering information about Chinese-Australian run businesses in Albany.

“It was like the Wallabies coming out of a hard pre-season training and lining up against the Albany under-12s touch footy team, and absolutely annihilating the locals,” he said.

“They were professional diplomats plying their statecraft, and we were the amateurs.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165709

File: 8475a04bb238584⋯.jpg (356.69 KB,2000x2667,2000:2667,Albany_councillor_Thomas_B….jpg)

File: 27ae382780a8256⋯.jpg (526.71 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Bibbulmun_Track_at_Tor….jpg)

>>19165707

2/2

He said many businesses in and around Albany had been hurt by trade restrictions China introduced in 2020.

“That behaviour was just bullying,” Dr Brough said. “And if a bully snots you one, and then afterwards you say, ‘oh, don’t upset the bully or he’ll punch us again’, that’s the wrong attitude,” he said. “I think we just stand up to bullies and say ‘no, play by the rules’. And if you’re going to do this, we’re not going to take it lying down.”

Albany mayor Dennis Wellington – who was in the role when the 2014 sister city relationship was established – told The Australian he was seeking advice from the WA Local Government Association about the protocols and possible implications of ending the connection.

He said he was unsure what dismantling the sister city connection would achieve, given it was already effectively dormant.

“It’s surprised me that it’s come up, because I didn’t think it was that relevant in the scheme of things,” he said.

The mayor played down the significance of the meeting with the Consul-General, noting that the town had similar engagements with delegations from the likes of Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia and The Philippines.

“That’s what they do to fill in their time, they wander around the state and say hello to people,” he said.

Another councillor, Chris Thomson, said he planned to second the motion.

Mr Thomson boycotted the meeting with the Consul-General and said the town should carry out a broader review of all its sister city relationships.

He said many sister city relationships around Australia were of questionable value and historically had been used as cover for “bilateral junketeering” by local councils.

China is WA’s largest trading partner by a considerable margin due to its demand for iron ore from the Pilbara.

Its economic ties to Albany, however, are comparatively limited.

Albany was the first white settlement in WA, with its history dating back to 1826. It occupies a significant place in Australia’s military history as it was the last port of call for ANZACs departing Australia during the First World War. It was also once a thriving whaling town, and today is the main regional centre on WA’s southern coast.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/china-tensions-spur-albany-councils-sister-city-fears/news-story/a5a81f2bc5b787859be43f8c1f043eae

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165734

File: dde4fb14a2cedbf⋯.jpg (151.06 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Lee_Hunter_general_manager….jpg)

File: eae369512cf216e⋯.jpg (463.27 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Liberal_senator_James_Pate….jpg)

File: 5ac6d70ff5e0d84⋯.jpg (59.66 KB,1200x578,600:289,Meta_head_of_public_policy….jpg)

File: 3ecc63b09fd0b55⋯.jpg (55.96 KB,1400x683,1400:683,LinkedIn_senior_director_o….jpg)

File: 44b92eec176098f⋯.jpg (63 KB,1300x647,1300:647,TikTok_general_manager_Aus….jpg)

>>19160171

Meta says China experimenting with Facebook influence tactics

Max Mason - Jul 11, 2023

Chinese agents are spreading targeted misinformation to journalists on Facebook as part of new efforts coming out of the Communist Party state to grow its influence.

Meta, which owns the social media giant, removed 200 operations globally for “violating our policy against co-ordinated inauthentic behaviour, and these networks came from 68 countries and operated in 42 languages”, Meta regional director of policy Mia Garlick told the Senate Committee on Foreign Interference through Social Media on Tuesday.

In the first quarter of 2023, Meta disrupted two so-called Co-ordinated Inauthentic Behaviour (CIB) networks originating out of China, and although they did not specifically target Australia, Meta said there had been a shift in tactics by China-based agents.

“Fifty per cent of the China-based CIB networks that we have actioned in the last four years, we’ve taken down in the last seven months, and we are seeing a range of new tactics evolving, such as operations that are linked to troll farms, attempts to co-opt journalists, NGOs or other respected third parties, attempts to work through PR firms,” Meta’s Australian head of public policy, Josh Machin, said.

Mr Machin said these tactics had been used by other foreign operations but now China had begun to experiment with them.

Attempts by foreign governments to use social media to influence other nations have become a mainstay for all players in the industry.

LinkedIn senior director of digital security Joshua Reiten said more than 80 million fake accounts were blocked on the Microsoft-owned business platform, including 400,000 attributed to Australia.

ASIO has warned that LinkedIn is being used by foreign powers to recruit people. Earlier this year, ASIO boss Mike Burgess warned that 16,000 Australian users still stated their security clearance on their profiles.

“When you have these foreign adversary state-sponsored actors who are engaging on our platform, they are invariably doing so through a fake account,” Mr Reiten told the committee on Tuesday.

“We invest heavily in automated measures to detect those fake accounts at creation, so when bad actors are trying to do that at scale, we are trying to detect the patterns in that fake account creation, those fake account creation efforts and restrict them before they ever go live.”

LinkedIn had a threat prevention team whose full-time job was to disrupt state-sponsored activity, Mr Reiten said.

In the feistiest exchange of the day, opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson pursued TikTok over claims made in an opinion article by its Australian general manager Lee Hunter last year.

Mr Hunter wrote the article for The Daily Telegraph last October following revelations in the US that journalists were spied on through the app by the company. His opinion article said a mode of surveillance alleged in an article in Forbes Magazine was not possible. However, in December 2022, TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, acknowledged that its claims about the Forbes story were false.

“Once it emerged after our op-ed that this serious misconduct by those rogue employees had taken place, of course, like many people, I was extremely disappointed in those actions, and heartened by the efforts that have taken place since to strengthen our security protocols and our policies within our business to ensure that that can’t happen again,” Mr Hunter said.

Mr Paterson responded: “Have you ever sought to publicly correct those false claims you made?”

“I stand by the sentiments that were expressed in that op-ed and I would not categorise the efforts as spying,” Mr Lee replied.

https://www.afr.com/technology/meta-says-china-experimenting-with-facebook-influence-tactics-20230711-p5dnds

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/tiktok-boss-lee-hunter-asks-for-be-measured-on-fact-not-fiction/news-story/67ff032a0a3cddd9c58f515d054baf37

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165779

File: 8ca3d445ab9daf0⋯.jpg (302.39 KB,1200x720,5:3,Chinese_top_diplomat_Wang_….jpg)

>>19154798

Solomon Islands officially opens embassy in Beijing, 'a big milestone' to further enhance relations between countries and people

Shan Jie, Bai Yunyi and Fan Anqi - Jul 11, 2023

1/2

Through a ceremony with applause and dances in Beijing, the Solomon Islands officially opened its embassy in China on Tuesday, almost four years after the two countries established diplomatic ties. The Tuesday event, as Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare told the Global Times, is "a big milestone" that is expected to further enhance the relations between the two countries and their people.

The ceremony, held in Beijing, was attended by Wang Yi, director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, and Sogavare, who is on his second official visit to China.

Barrett Salato was introduced by Sogavare as the new Solomon Islands Ambassador to China at the event. Before this, he served as the Trade Commissioner in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and External Trade of the Solomon Islands, according to the local government website.

In the future, through the embassy, bilateral relations between the Solomon Islands and China, people-to-people ties, and shared values between the two countries will be further strengthened, Sogavare told the Global Times.

He further noted that China is a great country, and for countries like the Solomon Islands and other similar Pacific Island countries, it would be "very stupid" not to increase cooperation with China and seize the development opportunities it offers.

"China is our good friend, and it can help us achieve these development goals," he concluded.

The two countries established diplomatic ties on September 21, 2019. Half a month later, Sogavare paid his first visit to China, during which the Solomon Islands officially joined the Belt and Road Initiative.

Analysts believe that since the establishment of diplomatic relations, China-Solomon Islands relations have made great progress. In 2022, the two countries even signed a security pact that drew global attention.

On Monday afternoon, Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Sogavare in Beijing, as the two sides jointly announced the official establishment of a comprehensive strategic partnership based on mutual respect and common development for a new era.

Sogavare and Chinese Prime Minister Li Qiang have also witnessed the signing of a number of bilateral cooperation documents on development cooperation, trade, civil aviation, customs and meteorology, the Xinhua News Agency reported.

"It is a bilateral relation forged together by shared principles of equality, respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, and non interference. Solomon Islands-China relation is special and unique," Sogavare said in his speech at the opening ceremony, recalling that China was one of the first countries to provide Solomon Islands much needed vaccine during the pandemic.

"It provides our country with its testing equipments and supported our national health infrastructure. China stood by the Solomon Islands," he said.

He also reaffirmed Solomon Islands' recognition of the one-China principle and vowed to boost engagement with China at all levels. "I made it very clear, there is only one China in the world, and Taiwan is an integral part of this great country," he said at the event.

Media reported that Sogavare is leading a delegation consisting of representatives from diplomatic, trade, and other fields, to visit multiple cities and provinces in China, including Beijing, East China's Jiangsu, and South China's Guangdong provinces. They will also visit several companies to explore cooperation opportunities.

"I am very pleased," said Chinese Ambassador to the Solomon Islands, Li Ming, in an interview with the Global Times at the opening ceremony. He expressed the hope that the opening of the embassy would further promote bilateral relations to new heights.

"I believe that whether in Beijing or Honiara, the embassies of both sides are willing to work together to promote greater development in the friendly relations between the two countries and their peoples," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165782

File: 35e15e7041feaea⋯.jpg (138.54 KB,1200x720,5:3,Chinese_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

>>19165779

2/2

People-to-people exchanges

At the opening ceremony on Tuesday, some young Solomon Islanders, dressed in traditional attire, joyfully performed traditional dances, representing different islands of the Pacific country. Behind them, the background screen was showing the beautiful scenery of the tropic islands, with a slogan saying "Welcome to Solomon Islands."

These young people are students from Solomon Islands who are currently studying at various Chinese universities.

Thanks to the support of the Chinese government, many students from the Solomon Islands have been able to receive higher education in China over the past years. They are the best example of the people-to-people exchanges between the two countries.

"I meet many helpful people here and I want to study very hard in China," Roxbe Gideon, a Northwestern Polytechnical University student from the Solomon Islands, told the Global Times at the Tuesday event. Gideon, majoring in civil engineering, said that he would like to follow his father's footsteps and become an engineer.

Nisi Alexandrick, Gideon's schoolmate, majoring in aeronautics, hoped to use the knowledge he learned in China to help improve aeronautics or aircraft system in his motherland, in order to improve the air transportation.

Apart from attending the opening ceremony, during their trip in Beijing, the students also had the opportunity to visit Tian'anmen Square and some leading technological companies such as the China National Aero-Technology Import & Export Corporation.

According to the "Joint Statement on Establishing a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Featuring Mutual Respect and Common Development For a New Era" published on Monday, China and the Solomon Islands will "expand exchanges and cooperation in areas such as culture, education, health, sports, tourism, youth, think tank and the media and at the subnational level."

China will continue to provide government scholarships and various kinds of training opportunities including maritime support and send medical teams to Solomon Islands. The Peace Ark hospital ship of the Chinese Navy will visit Solomon Islands and provide humanitarian medical service in 2023, read the statement.

The two sides formally signed the Agreement Between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Solomon Islands Relating to Civil Air Transport, and are committed to launching direct flights between the two countries as early as possible.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1294157.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165800

File: 6f80611f4322caa⋯.jpg (254.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ukrainian_President_Volody….jpg)

>>19160207

Zelensky 'to thank Albanese in person' for arms

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - 12 July 2023

Anthony Albanese still hopes to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday, the final day of the NATO summit in Lithuania, after a breakthrough saw alliance members agree on a 'clear path' for Ukraine’s NATO membership.

The NATO members also discussed a “coercive” China and the risk that poses to security across Europe and the Atlantic.

“China is not our adversary, and we should continue to engage,” NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg said, but warned: “Beijing’s increasing assertiveness affects our security”as well as challenging the rules-based international order.

However on Tuesday the focus was on a three pronged deal which will see NATO fund the transition of the Ukrainian armed forces equipment from Soviet-era to NATO standards and help rebuild Ukraine’s security and defence sector, covering critical needs like fuel, anti-mines equipment, and medical supplies.

Allies also agreed to establish the new NATO-Ukraine Council, which will meet in Vilnius on Wednesday. Allies reaffirmed that Ukraine will become a member of NATO, and agreed to remove the lengthy requirement for a Membership Action Plan. “This is a strong package for Ukraine, and a clear path towards its membership in NATO,” said Mr Stoltenberg.

Before the NATO plan was announced, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky had tweeted that current discussions at the Nato Summit were “absurd” and there were fears the pre-lunch meeting with Australia may be a late casualty.

Mr Zelensky had warned NATO that Ukraine deserves respect, expressing fears that there had been no time frame established for Ukraine’s membership of the alliance.

Mr Zelensky believed that NATO was opening the door to bargain Ukraine's membership in NATO in any negotiations with Russia.

He warned that for Russia this situation gave the Kremlin “motivation to continue its terror”.

But Ukrainian delegation officials told The Australian that Mr Zelensky wanted to personally thank Mr Albanese for Australia’s new commitment of a six month deployment of the sophisticated Wedgetail reconnaissance plane and 100 military personnel to protect the supply line of military weapons into Ukraine.

Mr Albanese said Mr Zelensky was “such a strong advocate for his people, and such an extraordinary leader: he is an inspiration to the people of Ukraine’’.

Mr Zelensky arrived in Lithuania and attended a 5000-strong rally of Lithuanians and Ukrainian refugees in the centre of Vilnius on Tuesday night amid tight security. He was mobbed by supporters draped in the colours of the Ukrainian flag. “I will speak Ukrainian, the language of our heroes and war heroes,’’ he told the enthusiastic crowd as he was joined on stage by wife Olena, Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda and his wife Diana.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politicsnow-tech-giants-lawyers-warn-on-labor-bill/live-coverage/7b4f829878bbf3ac356e27c6db50f52c#107611

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165808

File: b1f0c6efdf35aae⋯.jpg (2.51 MB,4256x2832,266:177,Barry_Cable_in_2012_when_h….jpg)

File: d8a43a0201404e8⋯.jpg (239.68 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Barry_Cable_in_his_playing….jpg)

>>19016533

>>19082514

Barry Cable removed from Sport Australia Hall of Fame

Carla Jaeger - July 10, 2023

Disgraced AFL footballer Barry Cable has been removed from the Sport Australia Hall of Fame.

The decision comes after a Judge Mark Herron found in the District Court of Western Australia in June that Cable had repeatedly sexually assaulted a girl during his playing career.

The civil matter was brought by the complainant, and was not a criminal prosecution. The judge also found there was compelling evidence Cable also abused other children.

Sport Australia chair John Bertrand said his board decided on Friday to strip the once-esteemed footballer of the national honour that had been bestowed on him.

In making the decision, the board said:

“Induction into the Sport Australia Hall of Fame is reserved for the best of the best. Those who are inducted into this elite group have not only excelled in their chosen field, but uphold the character traits of dignity, integrity, courage, modesty and pride.

“Cable’s actions are contrary to the values of the organisation, and as a result his SAHOF membership is revoked immediately.”

The board decided the court ruling against Cable brought its hall of fame into disrepute, and was likely to cause prejudice and harm.

Its decision came two weeks after the AFL and Cable’s former Victorian club, North Melbourne, removed him from their respective halls of fame.

A woman who told the court she was sexually abused as a girl by Cable criticised the league at the time for taking so long to make that decision.

“Today’s decision by the AFL is nearly a quarter of a century late as far as I am concerned,” she said in a statement.

“He was never a legend. He was a paedophile and a liar who bullied and abused children.”

Cable’s case prompted the AFL to change its rules to allow it to suspend or revoke the membership of anyone convicted of an indictable offence or those deemed to have engaged in serious misconduct that brought the game into disrepute.

The complainant’s lawyer, Rightside Legal partner Michael Magazanik, also hit out at the AFL and the Kangaroos for not earlier expressing compassion for the five women who had testified in court in February of Cable’s abuse.

“The AFL has now followed other organisations who have withdrawn Cable’s honours but neither the AFL nor the North Melbourne and Perth clubs have offered any support to these women,” Magazanik said. “The AFL has known for months that one of its coaches molested children while coaching.

“Despite the increasing role of women in the leadership of the AFL and its teams, they are sending a terrible message to the women who follow AFL football.”

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/barry-cable-removed-from-sport-australia-hall-of-fame-20230710-p5dmzq.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165824

File: e3e5a92e2f75b4f⋯.jpg (317.96 KB,1920x1280,3:2,WA_Police_to_revisit_Barry….jpg)

>>19016533

>>19082514

Police speaking with Barry Cable's sex abuse 'victim'

Tim Dornin - July 12, 2023

Police are speaking with a woman found to have been repeatedly sexually abused by Barry Cable amid the possibility of criminal charges against the disgraced footballer.

After a civil trial in the District Court of Western Australia, Judge Mark Herron in June found Cable abused the victim over five years from 1968 when she was aged 12.

Judge Herron said there was also compelling evidence the now 79-year-old, who has denied all allegations, had violated other children.

WA Police Commissioner Col Blanch said he had to be cautious in commenting because of the sensitive nature of sexual offences.

But he confirmed police were talking with the now 67-year-old woman.

"We are speaking with the victim and the family, and we've got to make sure that we take every step appropriately through this and support any victim of any sex offence as best we can," he told ABC radio on Wednesday.

"Because, ultimately, we want justice when there is the suspicion of a crime being committed."

In the civil case, the judge found Cable began grooming the girl, who used to babysit his infant son, with sexualised conversations and unwanted touching before escalating to almost-weekly sexual assaults.

He assaulted the girl at a public swimming pool, the Perth Football Club change rooms and at his home while her younger sister slept nearby.

On multiple occasions, Cable threatened to sexually abuse the younger sister if his victim did not comply with his demands, Judge Herron found.

Mr Blanch said any criminal case against Cable, who was stripped in June of his Australian Football Hall of Fame honours, would be harder to prove.

"In a civil case, you have to meet the balance of probabilities which is what was met in the recent civil case," he said.

"If we are to go to court and be successful, we would have to meet beyond all reasonable doubt.

"So it's a much higher standard of proof and all that means is our evidence has to be spot on and we have to convince either a judge or a jury that, beyond all reasonable doubt, that this offence was committed."

The woman first went to police in 1998 but prosecutors declined to charge Cable.

She launched civil action in 2019 after the WA government removed time limits for abuse survivors to bring lawsuits.

In a written submission to the civil trial, Cable denied any abuse.

He had an illustrious playing career for Perth and East Perth in the WAFL and North Melbourne in the VFL, going on to coach in both leagues.

The woman was awarded $818,700 in damages but expected to receive "zero" compensation because Cable had been declared bankrupt, her lawyer said.

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service (1800 211 028)

https://fullstop.org.au/get-help/our-services

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/crime/police-speaking-with-barry-cables-sex-abuse-victim-c-11257079

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19165867

File: 147c7ecee53f050⋯.jpg (210.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_meets_Ukr….jpg)

File: 5c50bea9fb0ffa1⋯.jpg (327.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ukrainian_soldiers_in_fron….jpg)

>>19075501

>>19160207

>>19165800

Anthony Albanese gives Volodymyr Zelensky 30 more Bushmasters at NATO summit in Lithuania

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - JULY 12, 2023

Anthony Albanese will give Ukraine an extra 30 Bushmasters after telling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Australia “will remain with you for as long as this takes for you to restore your sovereignty and repel this brutal invasion’’.

Meeting the war-torn country’s leader for a second time, the Prime Minister said providing the latest batch of Bushmasters would bring the tally of the vehicles being used by grateful Ukrainian soldiers to 120.

The vehicles are in addition to recent commitments to provide an RAAF Wedgetail aircraft and 100 associated military personnel to service the plane, based in ­Germany.

So far, the federal government has provided military assistance of more than $710m, with total support, including humanitarian aid, at $890m.

“Mr Zelensky is very grateful for the support Australia has given; the Ukrainian struggle is a very difficult one and they would like as much support as possible across a range of assets,” Mr Albanese said in a statement.

“This (supply of extra Bushmasters) is very positive – we know it makes a difference.”

He said there were issues of supply with providing any of the light armoured four-wheel-drive Hawkeis, which Ukraine had previously requested.

“We have explained what the issues were; we want to make sure we provide equipment that maximises the positive difference it will make,’’ he said. “We know the Bushmaster can do that.’’

Mr Zelensky told Mr Albanese: “Australia stands shoulder to shoulder with our people and we appreciate that support.”

Mr Albanese also told him that Australia would continue to impose sanctions on Russia and that “recently we had an issue with a Russian embassy in Australia and we took action to ensure they weren’t in a position which was inappropriate (to be) so close to our Parliament House.”

The Prime Minister spent 15 minutes with the Ukrainian leader on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Vilnius on Wednesday, reiterating that “we will remain with you as long as this takes for you to restore your sovereignty and repel this brutal invasion’’.

The latest tranche of equipment comes as Australia is preparing to send the Wedgetail to Europe in October. It is considered the most sophisticated surveillance craft in the world, and will help secure the logistic supply lines going into Ukraine.

Other countries have also reached deep into the armoury. France is to provide Ukraine with new long-range missiles and Germany said it would provide more tanks, Patriot missile defences and armoured vehicles worth €700m.

France, Germany, the US and Britain are to ameliorate Mr Zelensky’s disappointment about NATO not providing an immediate pathway to join the alliance with a security guarantee. This will include extended military provisions well into the future to deal with Russia, even long after the current war is concluded.

The NATO summit has been dominated by Mr Zelensky’s fury that Ukraine may not be invited to join the military alliance, describing the current discussions by European and North American leaders as “absurd”.

A 5000-strong rally of Lithuanians and Ukrainian refugees gathered in the centre of Vilnius on Tuesday night amid tight security and mobbed the wartime leader.

“I will speak Ukrainian, the language of our heroes and war heroes,’’ he told the enthusiastic crowd as he was joined on stage by wife Olena, Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda and his wife, Diana.

NATO leaders have been focused on a three-prong deal to fund transition of Ukrainian armed forces equipment from the Soviet era to NATO standards and help rebuild Ukraine’s security and defence sector, covering critical needs like fuel, de-mining equipment and medical supplies.

Allies also agreed to establish a NATO-Ukraine Council.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-gives-volodymyr-zelensky-30-more-bushmasters-at-nato-summit-in-lithuania/news-story/4736492bcc57f7ed42f73c4cb22215f6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8cfb26 No.19171198

>>18928650

Baker, BV Triple-A here

I'm just recreating all notable posts since Australia #22.

I noticed that there were connection issues when capturing Australia #26, and thus quite a few posts were marked as deleted internally, which then caused files attached not getting archived.

Do you still have full-size images that were posted during #26?

If so, can you upload them somewhere, so I can get them and fix these?

See >>>/qnotables/41938

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19171370

>>19171198

Yes, I still have the full-size images that I posted during QRA #26. I'll need some time to curate and upload them. Should be ready by the weekend.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8cfb26 No.19171390

>>19171370

great, just uploaded them to some file sharing site, I will then grab them and fix the current posts

Thank you

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8cfb26 No.19171789

>>19171390

*upload

sorry, typo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19177536

File: 2bb0f64669fde19⋯.jpg (1.42 MB,5000x3453,5000:3453,Australian_Foreign_Ministe….jpg)

Foreign Minister Penny Wong meets China's Wang Yi on sidelines of ASEAN summit

Bill Birtles - 14 July 2023

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has told her Chinese counterpart Australia expects more movement from Beijing on its crippling trade restrictions, as questions mount on whether China is setting the right conditions for a visit by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese this year.

Ms Wong met the Chinese Communist Party's Foreign Affairs director Wang Yi for almost an hour on the sidelines of the East Asia Foreign Ministers summit in Jakarta.

It was the fourth time the pair had met since Xi Jinping's government ended its two-and-a-half-year refusal to speak to Australian ministers, a stance Mr Xi changed after the Albanese government took power.

This latest meeting has been seen as crucial for keeping on track a planned visit by Mr Albanese to the Chinese capital, which would be the first by an Australian leader since 2016.

Ms Wong described her meeting with Mr Wang as "a frank conversation" that included China's trade barriers on Australian exports and the jailing of Australian citizens.

"In relation to trade impediments, I acknowledged the progress we have seen in recent months and reiterated our expectation that this progress continues," she said.

China has begun allowing Australian coal and timber back into its massive market, but maintains tariffs or unofficial bans on wine and lobsters.

Ms Wong said she also raised the plight of Australians jailed in China.

"It is our practice to ensure that we raised the circumstances of Ms Cheng Lei and Dr Yang Hengjun, as well as other Australians who are facing the death penalty," she said.

Recent actions taken by China's government have raised doubts by the federal opposition and some activists about whether Mr Xi's government is creating the right environment for the visit to take place.

Last week Hong Kong's government, controlled by Beijing, announced bounties for the arrests of two exiled political activists living in Australia, including an Australian citizen.

Hong Kong's leader said authorities would pursue the men for life, describing them as fugitives and vowing to punish them under a sweeping security law used to target political opposition.

"We did discuss Hong Kong … and you should anticipate that it was consistent with what I've said publicly", Ms Wong said after her meeting with Wang Yi.

"The Australian government and the Australian people treasure freedom of expression and freedom of political expression", she said.

On the trade front, Mr Xi's government this week backtracked on a pledge to spend three months reviewing the crushing tariffs it imposed on Australian barley, saying it needed another month.

The anti-dumping tariffs were introduced in 2020 amid high diplomatic tension and they're viewed as punitive by Australian officials and industry groups.

Australian officials were confident they were on the verge of winning a World Trade Organization (WTO) challenge to the tariffs, but in a face-saving move they agreed to drop the case in exchange for China's three-month review, on expectations Beijing would remove them.

A spokesperson for Ms Wong and Trade Minister Don Farrell this week threatened to resume the WTO case if the tariffs were not lifted in August.

The setback has dashed hopes for any speedy return of Australian wine to China's huge market, which was also targeted with tariffs during the period of diplomatic tension.

While China has begun resuming imports of coal and timber, it maintains restrictions on several other types of exports including lobsters.

A lack of movement on the continuous jailing of two Australians in Beijing has also raised questions about whether it would be appropriate for Mr Albanese to be seen shaking Xi Jinping's hand in Beijing, the same city where Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun are locked up.

Mr Yang has been detained for more than four years, Ms Cheng for almost three, and both are accused of state security-related crimes.

Neither has received a verdict or sentence in China's secretive courts, which are completely controlled by Xi Jinping's ruling Communist Party.

A Chinese government-controlled court sentenced a third Australian, Karm Gillespie, to death in mid 2020.

Mr Gillespie was arrested six years earlier at Guangzhou's airport for allegedly trafficking methamphetamine, but his sentence and verdict were announced via the court's website during the period of high tension in the diplomatic relationship.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/foreign-minister-penny-wong-meet-with-chinas-wang-yi/102600618

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19182700

>>19171370

>>19171198

Try this - QRA#26.zip

1,191 files, 1.0 GB

https://ufile.io/4tfumufp

Best of luck.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

45513e No.19183235

File: dd0b383ef438c3c⋯.jpg (21.12 KB,400x400,1:1,Thumbs_Up.jpg)

>>19182700

Perfect.

Thank you.

I uploaded the thumbnails, will have to try to fix it all…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188733

Notables

are not endorsements

#30 - Part 1

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>18928925 Video: Mark McGowan resigns as WA Premier - Western Australia’s Premier Mark McGowan has announced he is stepping down as the state’s leader, admitting his many years serving has left him “exhausted”. “I just don‘t have the energy or drive that is required to continue in the role as Premier. Or to fight that election which would have been my eighth election as a Member of Parliament,” he said. McGowan led Labor back to government with an overwhelming victory over the Liberal government in March 2017, and again at the 2021 election. He enforced some of the toughest Covid-19 restrictions on travel during the pandemic.

>>18928944 Video: Mark McGowan stands down as WA premier in shock announcement, citing exhaustion - WA Premier Mark McGowan has announced he is retiring from politics in a bombshell announcement. In a press conference held with just 45 minutes' notice, Mr McGowan said he would step down as premier and member for Rockingham at the end of the week. "The truth is I'm tired, extremely tired. In fact, I'm exhausted," he said. Mr McGowan enjoyed overwhelming popularity in his second term throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, enacting the nation's strictest border policies. The approach came with its critics, with some arguing it was heavy-handed, and prompting then-deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce to describe WA as a "kind of hermit kingdom".

>>18928950 WA Premier Mark McGowan’s shock departure puts Labor seats at risk - Mark McGowan’s shock departure from politics inflicts a ­massive blow to the Labor Party’s prospects at the 2025 state and federal elections. Western Australia’s most popular leader in its history whose landslide 2021 state election victory left the Liberal and National parties in ruin – played a huge hand in delivering Anthony Albanese majority government. Albanese had to wait for the red wave in Perth where results rolled in two hours behind those on the east coast – to deliver Labor the Liberal seats of Swan, Hasluck, Tangney and Pearce, before claiming majority government on election night. McGowan’s “X-factor” significantly boosted federal Labor’s stocks in Western Australia, and ALP strategists are concerned that losing his popular appeal in the west will make it tougher to retain seats.

>>18928954 Exit door: ‘Premier’s legacy a weakened federation’ - Mark McGowan was the first premier to take as strong an alternative approach to a federal government in foreign policy and “revelled” in stepping out from the commonwealth particularly on the relationship with China, foreign policy experts say. The outgoing Western Australian leader frequently called out the former Coalition government and its handling of the relationship with Beijing, which he labelled “insane”, and demanded Scott Morrison end the damaging rhetoric against Australia’s biggest trading partner. During a visit to China last month - the first in four years - Mr McGowan said it was “unfounded” to have a “fearful relationship” with Beijing after 50 years of fostering a close economic relationship.

>>18934236 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to see @SenSchumer at the Capitol. It was a busy day for the Majority Leader, but we found time to talk about the proliferation of Aussies and (Australian) coffee shops in NYC, and the passage of necessary legislation to support AUKUS.

>>18934236 https://qalerts.pub/?q=schumer - https://qalerts.pub/?q=[CS]

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188735

#30 - Part 2

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>18940103 Why ‘gender affirming’ care is destroying our most vulnerable kids - "For years readers of The Australian have been made aware of the controversies surrounding the medical treatment of children who identify as other than their natal sex. But it is only recently the seriousness of the public health crisis has begun to be apparent. This is a public health crisis caused not by a virus, not by a disease, but by a social contagion. It is time for plain speaking about the issue. The transgender movement has been based on one truth and a thousand lies. The truth is that for a very small number of people, mostly born male, there can be such a disconnect between body and mind that they cannot find peace unless and until they take such steps as they can to pass as the other sex. This can involve taking cross-sex hormones and undergoing major surgeries that are difficult and risky. Those who take this path, usually well into their adult years and after much suffering, are courageous. They deserve respect and support from us all. But that one truth has been the nurse log on which a vast number of falsehoods have sprouted. Examples include the notion that there are not just two sexes, or that it is actually possible to change sex or be “non-binary”, or the idea that every child has an innate gender identity that awaits discovery. Most people know these things to be nonsense, but in polite society we have been asked to pretend otherwise." - Patrick Parkinson, emeritus professor of law at the University of Queensland and former chair of the Family Law Council - theaustralian.com.au

>>18940139 Donald Trump Jr demands media apologise for airing false claims that his father colluded with Vladimir Putin for 2016 election - Donald Trump Jr has lambasted the media for airing false claims about his father’s alleged collusion with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2016 presidential election and said outlets who endorsed the claims - including the ABC – should publicly apologise. After the release of the 316-page Durham report earlier this month, which criticised the FBI’s handling of the investigation into the alleged ties between the two leaders and found no evidence of collusion between Mr Trump and Mr Putin, Mr Trump Jr said his father was owed an apology. “The media made millions of dollars, the country was divided and my father’s first term was hamstrung by the whole thing,” the former president’s eldest son told The Australian.

>>18940223 Video: Memorial Day | The Last Full Measure of Devotion - May 29, 2023 - This #MemorialDay, we pay tribute to the brave men and women of the Armed Forces who made the ultimate sacrifice defending the nation’s freedom. Let us remember the greatness of past generations and find inspiration from their courage, devotion, and selfless determination. Semper Fidelis. (U.S. Marine Corps Video by Staff Sgt. John A. Martinez) - United States Marine Corps

>>18940278 Q Post #4545 - If America falls so does the world. If America falls darkness will soon follow. Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy. Their power and control relies heavily on an uneducated population. A population that trusts without individual thought. A population that obeys without challenge. A population that remains outside of free thought, and instead, remains isolated living in fear inside of the closed-loop echo chamber of the controlled mainstream media. This is not about politics. This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow. We are living in Biblical times. Children of light vs children of darkness. United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4545

>>18940278 Q Post #1350 - If America falls, the World falls. God bless our brave fighting men & women. They deserve our deepest gratitude. Through their strength, and the millions of united Patriots around the World, we will succeed in this fight. Peace through strength. Now comes the pain. Q - https://qanon.pub/#1350

>>18940278 Q Post #2309 - WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL! WE, THE PEOPLE! FROM SEA TO SHINING SEA. LET FREEDOM RING, PATRIOTS. IT IS YOUR TIME. IF AMERICA FALLS, THE WORLD FALLS. UNITED WE STAND! GOD BLESS YOU ALL. Q+ - https://qanon.pub/#2039

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188737

#30 - Part 3

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>18945832 Health leaders reject the need for oversight of transgender medicine - Australia’s most senior health leaders have dismissed suggestions the commonwealth should take a greater oversight and regulatory role in the prescription of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children as the federal government admits it has no idea how widely the drugs are being prescribed off-label for gender dysphoria.

>>18946058 Talisman Sabre Facebook Post: The countdown is on for Talisman Sabre 2023 - The largest bilateral military training activity between #YourADF and the United States is set to take place from 22 July - 4 August in Queensland. This year’s exercise will be the biggest yet in terms of geographical spread and number of partner nations participating. Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany and Indonesia will all take part and contribute to the exercise’s outcomes. Read more - https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2023-05-15/planning-key-success-talisman-sabre - #TalismanSabre2023

>>18946058 Talisman Sabre - MAGIC SWORD - https://qanon.pub/?q=Operation%20Specialists - https://qanon.pub/?q=magic

>>18949906 Kyiv ‘needs to wait’ for fresh support, says Anthony Albanese - Anthony Albanese has pushed back at Ukraine’s suggestion his government is preparing to unveil fresh support for Ukraine next month, saying announcements would be made “when they’re ready to be made”. “My governments is a considered, adult government,” the Prime Minister told reporters on Saturday during a visit to Vietnam. “I can confirm that we make the announcements when they are ready, when they’ve been considered by all of our processes, including our cabinet.”

>>18955343 Devin Nunes Truth: Good morning #Australia - Glad to have you here @truthsocial

>>18955343 Karina Samperi Truth: Thank you @DevinNunes for finally letting #Australia join #TruthSocial. We have been waiting patiently to be let in support of the #Patriot movement that will affect #Australia

>>18960235 US Marines to join allied troops in Australia for combined force exercise - U.S. Marines in Australia will kick off a month of field training alongside Australian and Japanese troops next week, a precursor to one of the largest military exercises in the Pacific the following month. The exercise, Southern Jackaroo, is taking place between June 15 and mid-July, Maj. Matthew Wolf, a spokesman for Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, said. Next month, all three nations will participate in Talisman Sabre, a biennial exercise in Australia that’s scheduled to draw approximately 30,000 personnel.

>>18960257 Hawkei armoured cars bound for Ukraine war in Australian support deal - Australia is set to give Ukraine the missile-capable, four-wheel-drive armoured cars that it has been requesting for months - the Hawkei - as the centrepiece of a forthcoming support package. Although a formal commitment has yet to be sealed, there has been serious progress informally and Ukrainian Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov told the Herald and The Age the vehicles were number one on his list of “demands” from Australia. He described the Australian-made vehicles as “very, very famous armed vehicles with air defence systems” in an interview in Singapore after meeting his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, at the weekend. The Hawkei is a seven-tonne armoured car designed to be fitted with the same Norwegian-American air defence system that protects the White House.

>>18965978 Video: Nigel Farage said he decided to join Donald Trump Jr.'s Australian speaking tour because the former president's son is 'blooming-good fun' - Former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage has announced he is joining Donald Trump Jr.’s speaking tour of Australia. The eldest son of the former US president is set to appear in Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne between 9 and 11 July, this year. Speaking to Sky News Australia’s Paul Murray, the former UK politician-turned GB News host said he had decided to join the tour - which will also include South Australian senator Alex Antic – at the last minute. “I’m coming, well for a couple of reasons really: One, I don’t think you get quite enough real, proper conservative conversation down in Australia these days; number two, I want you all to realise that whatever madnesses you're facing, we're facing them in America and in Britain; and number three, I really like Donald Trump Jr., he’s blooming-good fun, and it’s going to be a great time,” Mr Farage said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188739

#30 - Part 4

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>18971108 Australia to ban swastika, SS sign citing rise of far-right - Video: Australia said on Thursday it would introduce laws to the parliament next week banning public displays and sales of Nazi hate symbols, citing a rise in far-right activities at home. The swastika, one of the most recognisable symbols of Nazi propaganda, and the insignia of Schutzstaffel (SS), the paramilitary wing of the Nazi party, will be outlawed to be used as flags and armbands or printed on clothes. "We've seen, very sadly, a rise in people displaying these vile symbols, which are symbols that have no place in Australia, they should be repugnant," Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus told Channel Seven television.

>>18971120 ‘Not pulling our weight’: Bipartisanship collapses over Ukraine support - A fight has erupted between the major parties over Australian support for Ukraine’s war against Russia, with the federal opposition declaring it embarrassing that Ukrainian officials have been forced to resort to social media posts to plead for more military assistance from the Albanese government. In the Coalition’s strongest criticism yet of the government’s Ukraine policy, opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham and defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said they were concerned that Australia was no longer pulling its weight when it came to supporting Ukraine’s military efforts.

>>18971125 Retired Australian F/A-18 Hornet jets a step closer to joining Ukraine's war effort - Kyiv has assured the White House that it would not deploy second-hand Australian warplanes into Russian airspace if dozens of the retired F/A-18s are transferred to Ukraine. High-level international negotiations are continuing between Australia, Ukraine, and the United States over the fate of the decommissioned fighter aircraft, in what could become this country's largest-ever single transfer of military equipment to a foreign power.

>>18977940 Alexander Soros, PhD Tweet: Was great to see my good friend and now Australian ambassador to the US @MrKRudd when I was in DC, one of the smartest statesmen there is. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Soros - https://qalerts.pub/?q=soros - https://qalerts.pub/?q=[GS]

>>18977940 Q Post #416 - Soros takes orders from P. You have no idea how sick and evil these people are. Fight, fight, fight. Day of days. Game over. Q

>>18977940 Q Post #4349 - Nobody escapes this. Q

>>18983042 White House asked to approve Australian F/A-18 Hornets for Ukraine - Kyiv has formally asked the White House to green light the transfer of the RAAF’s fleet of retired F/A-18 Hornets to Ukraine under a commercial deal with a US aerospace company that has the rights to buy the aircraft. If the US approves the deal, Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles will be urged to make the sale happen, according to an Australian adviser to the Ukraine government who has been helping to broker the sale. Australian, American and Ukrainian officials are understood to have had initial discussions on the potential agreement in which Texas company RAVN Aerospace - which has paid a deposit for 41 of the jets - would on-sell its stake to Kyiv.

>>18983065 ‘Mystery man’ Robert Potter leads fighter jet talks in Ukraine - An Adelaide-born cyber security entrepreneur has emerged as a central figure in a proposed international arms deal to sell retired Australian fighter jets to Ukraine. Internet 2.0 co-founder Robert Potter has an agreement with Ukraine’s Digital Transformation Ministry to provide cyber security tools and training to support the country’s war against Russia. But Mr Potter’s role in the ­potential sale of up to 41 former RAAF F/A-18 Hornets to the country has raised eyebrows in Ukraine and Australia, with the Kyiv Post newspaper this week describing his involvement as “unconventional”.

>>18983102 Aussie Fighter Jets for Ukraine? More Questions Than Answers - "The mandate for such a deal or for the Australian cyber-security consultant who appears associated with it remains unclear after Kyiv Post investigated. Following the international spread of a media report that Australia and the US were negotiating with Ukraine about providing retired Australian F/A-18 aircraft, doubts about the alleged deal have emerged. Yesterday, the Australian Financial Review (AFR), a highly respected newspaper, published a report by two very well-regarded journalists that Australia, the US and Ukraine “are discussing sending 41 Royal Australian Air Force F/A-18 Hornets to Kyiv.” Given the Ukrainian government has repeatedly said that fighter aircraft are critical to their country’s defense, Kyiv Post sought to establish the bona fides of developments reported by AFR." - Pete Shmigel - kyivpost.com

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188741

#30 - Part 5

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>18987818 Australian deaths from ‘suicide kits’ linked to global investigation - The deaths of several Australians by suicide have been linked to a now global investigation into a Canadian chef who has been charged in his homeland with selling a lethal substance online to vulnerable people all over the world. Australian law enforcement agencies have joined investigators in Britain, the United States, Italy, New Zealand and Canada to investigate alleged suicide kits sent by Kenneth Law who, for almost two years, used a website to sell a poison that at-risk people could use to end their lives.

>>18987863 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post: Video: Always Ready - Check out U.S. Marines with MRF-D as they conduct an embassy reinforcement scenario at Mount Bundey Training Area! - #AlliesandPartners #FreeandOpenIndoPacific #MRFD #embassy - (U.S. Marine Corps Video by Cpl. Brayden Daniel)

>>18992075 The Age sacks columnist Julie Szego amid gender furore - The editor of The Age has sacked one of the masthead’s star columnists, Julie Szego, after she took aim at the publication over its ­refusal to run an article on youth gender transition. Last week, Szego posted on ­social media that while she had been commissioned to write a feature-length story about the contentious issue by the newspaper’s former editor Gay Alcorn, The Age’s current boss Patrick Elligett refused to run it. Szego, a freelancer who has written for The Age on and off for more than two decades, subsequently chose to self-publish the 5000-word piece on her own Substack page, telling her social media followers about her new blog: “I’ll be writing about gender identity politics … without the copy being rendered unreadable by a committee of woke journalists redacting words they deem incendiary, such as ‘male’.”

>>18992075 A QUESTION OF TRANSITION - Youth gender treatment under scrutiny - JULIE SZEGO - 4 JUN 2023 - "This is a piece The Age refused to publish. It is the first in a series I’ll be posting here." - https://szegounplugged.substack.com/p/a-question-of-transition

>>18992091 Senior child psychiatrist stood down after questioning gender medicine - The suspension of a senior staff psychiatrist over her approach to transgender patients has thrown the Queensland Children’s Hospital into turmoil, casting a spotlight on widespread concerns among doctors at the treatment of children with gender dysphoria. The case of Jillian Spencer – stood down from clinical duties apparently accused of transphobia – has exposed a culture in which clinicians are unable to employ medical discretion or a neutral therapeutic stance and are bound by their employment to affirm children’s gender transition. Dr Spencer, a senior staff specialist in the QCH’s consultation liaison psychiatry team, was removed from clinical duties in mid-April following a patient complaint in an unusual response from a public hospital that followed months of conflict over affirmative gender medicine and trans identity politics within the hospital.

>>18998407 USA puts flying schools on Entity List for training PLA aircrew - The US Department of Commerce has added international flight schools to its Entity List, stating that they have recruited Western pilots to provide training for China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The two companies, the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) and Hong Kong-based Frontier Service Group, were among 43 entities added to the list. Entities on the list are subject to additional licensing requirements and policies beyond the USA’s standard Export Administration Regulations. The Commerce Department says that the various entities added have provided assistance to Beijing in areas such as pilot training, aircraft manoeuvres and tactics, hypersonic weapons development, and weapon lifecycle management using Western software. China’s tapping of former western military pilots has come into the spotlight in the last 12 months. Former US Marine Corps pilot Daniel Edmund Duggan is in Australia fighting extradition to the USA. He faces allegations that he helped train Chinese military pilots.

>>18998479 Video: Australia's Bushmasters to play 'huge role' in Ukrainian counteroffensive against Russia, troops say - In a secret location in eastern Ukraine, frontline troops from the 80th Air Assault Brigade are putting one of their Bushmasters through its paces. "It's fantastic," says driver Oleksandr when asked about the armoured personnel carrier that was built in Bendigo. "Words cannot express it. It's such a powerful vehicle. It is much easier to drive than our equipment," he says. Australia pledged 90 Bushmasters to Ukraine after President Zelenskyy addressed the national parliament last year and asked for the vehicles. They have proved invaluable to Ukraine's armed forces over the past year.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188745

#30 - Part 6

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>19005499 Video: Lidia Thorpe accuses fellow senator David Van of ‘sexually assaulting’ her - Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has in parliament accused Victorian Liberal senator David Van of “harassing” and “sexually assaulting” her. The allegation was made by Thorpe soon after Senate question time on Wednesday as Van made a speech accusing the Labor Party of disgraceful behaviour in its handling of the Brittany Higgins sexual assault allegations. “Even yesterday and today the muck that has been thrown from that side [Labor] to this side [Liberal] senators [Michaelia] Cash and [Linda] Reynolds is really just not on and makes a mockery of your words,” he said.” As Van speaks, Thorpe can be heard interjecting and calling out the word “perpetrator” and “You can talk! You can talk! You know what you were doing around this time, you know what you were doing around this time don’t you Van? You got away with a lot.” Senate deputy president Andrew McLachlan repeatedly attempted to stop Thorpe from interjecting. Then the former Greens senator rose on a point of order and said: “I’m feeling really uncomfortable when a perpetrator is speaking about violence”.

>>19005586 KanekoaTheGreat Tweet: Australia's Sky News discusses @MarcoPolo501c3 releasing a 630-page report with 2,020 citations that thoroughly documents 459 crimes committed by the Biden family & their business associates. •140 business crimes •191 sex crimes •128 drug crimes - https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1668724106001543168

>>19005590 Video: 'Out of a novel': Hunter Biden's laptop filled with sex, drugs and shady deals exposed - A former aide to Donald Trump has lifted the lid on Hunter Biden’s laptop which has plagued the Democratic Party since it first surfaced in October 2020. Garrett Ziegler was one of the few people given a copy of the laptop in 2020 by the former president’s ex-lawyer Rudy Giuliani. He has been named in Hunter Biden’s attorneys demands for the Delaware attorney general, Department of Justice and IRS to investigate those who published the president’s son's personal material. Within the laptop was a treasure trove of information suggesting the now President’s son had been involved in overseas business deals including lobbying foreign oligarchs, influence peddling. It also includes explicit photos and videos of Hunter engaging in sex acts and taking drugs. Mr Ziegler detailed the contents in an exclusive interview with Sky News Australia in a bid to paint “a true picture”.

>>19010951 ‘Take it to the police’: David Van responds to Lidia Thorpe claims - Victorian Liberal senator David Van has told Lidia Thorpe to go to the police if she believes, as she has claimed, that he sexually assaulted her. The independent senator on Wednesday performed an ­extraordinary backdown in parliament, withdrawing her accusation hours earlier that Mr Van had “harassed and sexually assaulted” her when his party was in government. Senator Van said Senator Thorpe’s accusations were “just awful,” telling 2GB the allegations were “Just terrible for me and my family.” “The only time I’ve ever even touched her was shaking her hand after her maiden speech. “Nothing else, that’s for sure,” he said.

>>19010988 Liberal Senator David Van was accused by Lidia Thorpe of harassment, here’s what we know about him - A former public affairs consultant from Victoria, ousted Liberal senator David Van was thrown into the spotlight when independent Lidia Thorpe used parliamentary privilege to accuse him of harassment and sexual assault. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on Thursday afternoon said further allegations had emerged about Senator Van and had “advised Senator Van of my decision that he should no longer sit in the Liberal Party party room.” Senator Thorpe on Thursday spoke of how she had faced “sexual comments” and had been “inappropriately propositioned” in corridors and stairwells of parliament house in an emotional speech to the Senate. “One man followed me and cornered me in a stairwell,” she said. “To me, it was sexual assault and the government of the time recognised it as such.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188746

#30 - Part 7

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>19011007 Lidia Thorpe says she was propositioned and inappropriately touched in parliament - Independent Lidia Thorpe has doubled down on her allegations that Liberal Senator David Van is a “perpetrator”, telling the Senate on Thursday that he was among a number of men in parliament who had made her feel “unsafe” in the building. In a tearful address to the upper house, the former Greens senator said she had been “propositioned and inappropriately touched” in the hallways and corridors of parliament and called on the government to immediately increase the number of security guards and cameras in the building. “As all women that have walked the corridors of this building know, it is not a safe place. You are often alone in long corridors with no windows and in stairwells hidden from view, where there are no cameras,” she told the senate. “I experienced sexual comments and it was inappropriately propositioned by powerful men. One man followed me and cornered me in a stairwell. “There are different understandings of what amounts to sexual assault and what I experienced has been being followed, aggressively propositioned and inappropriately touched.”

>>19011031 Video: David Van moves to the crossbench after Thorpe’s Senate accusations - Liberal senator David Van has been removed from the Liberal party room after a meeting with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton following accusations of harassment made by Lidia Thorpe in the Senate. Dutton said he had met with the Victorian senator on Thursday morning after further allegations had been brought to him overnight. “A short time ago I advised Senator Van of my decision that he should no longer sit in the Liberal party room. At the outset, I want to make clear, very clear that I’m not making any judgement on the veracity of the allegations or any individual’s guilt or innocence. I make that very clear,” Dutton said

>>19011145 Video: ‘Threat to our national security’: Government to terminate lease for new Russian embassy - The Albanese government has introduced emergency legislation to prevent Russia from opening a new embassy less than a kilometre from Parliament House in Canberra, saying the new site poses an unacceptable security risk. The government intervened in the long-running dispute about the embassy site after the Federal Court last week found an eviction order issued by the National Capital Authority (NCA) was invalid. The Russian government was granted the 99-year lease for the plot of land, in the upmarket suburb of Yarralumla, in 2008 but failed to progress plans to develop the site, leading the NCA to claim it should give it up to another country. “The government has received very clear security advice as to the risk presented by a new Russian presence, and so close to Parliament House,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a press conference.

>>19011190 Queensland makes gender optional on birth certificates - Sexual reassignment surgery will no longer be mandatory for adults and teenagers wanting to change sex on their Queensland birth certificates under new laws that were expected to pass state parliament. The transgender reforms, opposed by the Liberal National Party, will also give parents the ­option not to list any gender on their newborn’s documentation. Children older than 16 will be able to legally self-identify as another sex without parental consent, as long as they have a supporting statement from an adult who has known them for at least a year. Those aged 12 to 15 will ­require their parents’ permission to change their birth certificate, but can apply to the courts if their parents do not support an application. Attorney-General Yvette D’Ath said the opt-in approach for listing sex on birth certificates was designed to “give people the greatest agency over what information they want recorded. Providing these protections to trans and gender-diverse people does not pose a threat to others,” she said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188749

#30 - Part 8

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>19016472 Peter Dutton says senator David Van should quit parliament, after another allegation raised with him - Liberal leader Peter Dutton says senator David Van should quit parliament, after airing that allegations made against the senator by a third person were brought to him, contributing to his rapid expulsion from the party room. Over an explosive 48 hours, independent senator Lidia Thorpe raised allegations under parliamentary privilege that Senator Van had sexually harassed and assaulted her - which he immediately denied, and she later withdrew. Former Liberal senator Amanda Stoker yesterday raised her own claims that Senator Van had inappropriately touched her at a party by squeezing her bottom twice - something she said she dealt with internally at the time, but felt compelled to bring to Mr Dutton's attention after Senator Thorpe spoke in the Senate.

>>19016500 Sydney MP Alex Greenwich sues Mark Latham for allegedly suggesting he ‘goes to schools to groom children’ - Newly released court documents reveal independent MP Alex Greenwich is suing NSW One Nation leader Mark Latham for purportedly painting him as someone who “goes to schools to groom children to become homosexual”. Conservatives and progressives both responded with fierce disapproval to a graphic and homophobic tweet shared to Mr Latham’s social media on March 30 in which he claimed Mr Greenwich engaged in “disgusting” sexual activities. Mr Latham deleted the tweet after a public uproar and demands for an apology. “Greenwich goes into schools talking to kids about being gay. I didn’t want to be accused of anything similar, leaving that kind of content on my socials.”

>>19016596 Embassy of Russia in Australia Facebook Post: Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov: «To our regret, Australia diligently continues to move in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria that is now taking place in the Western countries. Australia is trying to be an excellent student there».

>>19016596 Australia diligently continues to move in main stream of Russophobic hysteria: Kremlin - Australia, having cancelled the lease agreement for the site for the construction of the new Russian embassy building, diligently continues to move forward in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria and tries to distinguish itself on this path, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. "To our regret, Australia diligently continues to move in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria that is now taking place in the Western countries. Australia is trying to be an excellent student there," the Kremlin spokesman told reporters on Thursday, commenting on Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's statement about introducing a relevant bill to parliament. - tass.com

>>19016648 Fears government data has been stolen by cyber criminals grow as law firm’s clients are revealed - The Albanese government has established a crisis group to examine what commonwealth data has been stolen by Russian-linked hackers who infiltrated the systems of HWL Ebsworth, the giant law firm that has tens of millions of dollars of contracts across at least 40 government departments and agencies. Sensitive agencies including Home Affairs, the Australian Federal Police, Australian Taxation Office, Department of Defence, Department of Foreign Affairs and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions are among those feared to have been impacted by the hack.

>>19016676 Data on secret missile testing site, attack helicopters and police operations stolen by hackers - Russian cyber hackers who infiltrated the computer systems of law firm HWL Ebsworth have obtained government files apparently relating to the top-secret Woomera missile testing site, navy’s attack helicopter replacement project and Australia’s politically sensitive enhanced engagement in the Indo-Pacific. Sources said the hack - one of the largest in Australian history - had also seen the ransomware gang ­obtain documents concerning police intelligence about protests at an immigration detention centre, the escape of prisoners, and projects involving special forces. While a court injunction obtained by the giant law firm has sought to limit public knowledge of the content of the hacked documents, The Weekend Australian can ­reveal there is deep concern and fury in Canberra, where at least 45 departments and agencies fear data they shared with HWL Ebsworth has been compromised.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188752

#30 - Part 9

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>19016711 ‘State warcraft’: Police won’t cop $1.7bn worth of meth imports - Federal police say international crime groups and “state actors” are threatening the rules-based order of democracies such as Australia by working together to smuggle illicit drugs, after revealing they had seized $1.7bn worth of meth bound for Victoria and NSW. In an extraordinary five-month operation, the Australian Federal Police, Victoria Police and other national crime-busting organisations worked with the Five Eyes law enforcement group to capture more than six tonnes of liquid and crystal methamphetamine since December last year. The illicit substance arrived in four separate sea cargo shipments, and originated from Canada. The drugs were replaced with a harmless substance but had it landed, almost 19 million street deals could have taken place.

>>19016940 Ukraine’s plea for Hawkei vehicles ‘unsupportable at this time’, government letter says - The Albanese government says it is unable to send Hawkei protected mobility vehicles to Ukraine in the near future despite increasingly desperate pleas from Kyiv, citing braking issues and a lack of spare parts. Ukraine has been requesting a fleet of Australian-made Hawkeis since September and the country’s Ministry of Defence has taken to social media in recent months to declare the vehicle its new “military crush”. In a letter sent to a member of the public earlier this month on behalf of Defence Minister Richard Marles, a senior Department of Defence official said: “We are aware of calls to provide [the] Hawkei to Ukraine. The combination of an unresolved braking issue and a limited supply of parts means that the gifting of the Hawkei is unsupportable at this time. The government is considering options for further support to Ukraine, which it will announce in due course.”

>>19021590 ‘Disregard for due process’: David Van resigns from Liberal Party following sexual harassment allegations - Victorian Senator David Van has formally resigned from the Liberal Party after what he has described as “wholesale disregard for due process and natural justice” in the handling of numerous sexual harassment allegations levelled against him. The Victorian Senator on Saturday wrote to Victorian Liberal Party president Greg Mirabella to say he was resigning his membership effective immediately. “I cannot remain a member of a party that tramples upon the very premise on which our justice system is predicated,” he said in the letter. “This is a travesty of justice and I reiterate that I deny the allegations made against me.

>>19021740, >>19021747 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to spend time with Pacific Ambassadors to the US and US Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy. Important conversations about the future of the region we all call home.

>>19026316 Albanese government must recognise Palestine this term: Victorian Labor Conference - The Victorian Labor conference has called on the Albanese government to recognise Palestine before the next election, setting the stage for the matter to become a focal point at the upcoming national conference in August. A motion put to the Victorian Labor conference today congratulated Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong for the restoration of aid to Palestinians and shifting Australia’s vote at the United Nations on matters relating to Israel’s occupation of Palestine. But the state conference called on the federal government to go further and formally recognise Palestine in this term.

>>19031721 Xie Feng (12th Chinese Ambassador to the United States) Tweet: Thank you, @AmboRudd, for inviting me and my wife to your beautiful residence. Good discussion.

>>19037068 Legalise Cannabis party introduces personal use bills in NSW, Victoria and Western Australia - The Legalise Cannabis party has today introduced bills to legalise marijuana for personal use in parliaments in Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia. It is the first time the same bill has been tabled in three states on the same day. The bills have been introduced to the states' upper houses and will need support from major parties to become law. It will not allow people under 18 to access cannabis, or permit driving while impaired by the drug. New South Wales upper house MP Jeremy Buckingham said the reform would allow people over the age of 18 to grow up to six cannabis plants in their households. It would also allow people to gift small quantities to other people but driving under the influence of the drug would remain prohibited.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188753

#30 - Part 10

Australian Politics and Society - Part 10

>>19037075 Daniel Andrews defends Israel, saying he would have voted against his faction’s Palestine motion - Daniel Andrews has issued a staunch defence of Israel’s sovereignty, voicing his opposition to his own faction’s motion on Palestinian recognition, which passed without dissent at Labor’s Victorian conference on Sunday. Recommitting to comments he made three weeks ago that the Jewish homeland represented the “only true democracy” in the Middle East, the Victorian Premier indicated he would oppose any motion regarding the recognition of Palestine at the national ALP conference due to be held in August. “My position on Israel has been very, very consistent and clear. It’s not always popular, but it’s my view, and it won’t change,” the Premier said.

>>19037159 Donald Trump Jr. Faces Calls to Be Banned From Australia - Donald Trump Jr. is facing calls for his banning in Australia ahead of his upcoming tour there. Trump, the eldest son of the former president and a prominent conservative voice in his own right, will be headed Down Under for a three-city speaking tour presented by the nonprofit organization Turning Point Australia, with stops in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, from July 9 to 11. He is expected to be joined by former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage. Trump Jr.'s scheduled appearances have generated calls for the Australian government to block him from entering the country. His Australian critics have launched petitions to ban him from obtaining a visa to come into the country and have vowed to disrupt his speaking engagements. One Change.org petition, titled "Stop Donald Trump Jr getting an Australian Visa," has gained over 14,000 signatures.

>>19037218 Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023: Largest US amphibious assault ship USS America to dock in Brisbane - The largest amphibious assault ship in the US Navy’s Seventh Fleet is expected to arrive in Brisbane on Tuesday afternoon. It will be the second time in three years the USS America, which carries fighter jets and tiltrotor aircraft such as MV22-Ospreys, has visited Queensland, but only the first time it has been allowed to dock and its crew to come ashore. With US Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit on board, the warship is pulling in for a port call before heading off to participate in the 10th iteration of Australia’s largest bilateral combined military training activity with the US, Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023.

>>19044137 ‘A real head-scratcher’: Australia’s commitment to Ukraine questioned - The Australian government has been criticised for failing to send a minister to represent the nation at the Ukraine recovery conference taking place in London on Wednesday. Foreign Minister Penny Wong will skip the conference, instead opting to attend parliament and send a pre-recorded video message. “The Albanese government continues to send all of the wrong signals about Australia’s commitment to Ukraine,” Birmingham said. “It’s staggering that the Albanese government is a repeated ministerial no-show at important discussions about Ukraine’s future.”

>>19044166 Left-wing activists try to ban Trump Jr. from Australia ahead of speaking tour - Left-wing activists are pushing to derail Donald Trump Jr.’s planned speaking tour in Australia, and a petition to deny him a visa into the country has netted more than 17,000 signatures. Former President Trump’s eldest son is launching a three-city speaking tour of Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne from July 9-11 that’s being held by Turning Point Australia, a sister organization of the American conservative group founded by Charlie Kirk. A Change.org page was launched in response calling for Trump Jr. to be blocked from even setting foot in Australia, which as of Tuesday morning has just over 17,200 supporters. "Donald Trump Jr is an illegal drug-taking bigoted person who should not be allowed to enter Australia for the purpose of earning himself and possibly his father any ‘Campaign Contributions’. Ban him from this country," wrote Kris Eriksen, the petition’s founder.

>>19044192 Amphibious assault ship ready for Talisman Sabre drills - The commander of a US Navy amphibious assault ship says he is "prepared" for attempts by other nations to seize maritime territory in the region. The USS America docked in the Port of Brisbane on Tuesday for a three-day visit ahead of the Talisman Sabre training exercise in northern Australia involving land combat, amphibious landings and air operations. The $A5 billion, 257-metre warship is crewed by 2000 sailors and marines and carries 20 aircraft including six F-35B Lightning II joint strike fighters with vertical take-off and landing capability.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188755

#30 - Part 11

Australian Politics and Society - Part 11

>>19044210 US sailors and Marines flock ashore as mega war ship USS America docks in Brisbane - Seeing koalas and kangaroos are high on the agenda for most of the crew of the USS America which arrived in Brisbane this week. The largest amphibious assault ship in the US Navy's Seventh Fleet docked to allow its 2500 embarked US Marines and sailors to enjoy a port visit before participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023, Australia’s largest bilateral combined military training activity with the US. The 257m-long ship is designed to accommodate F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters and a combination of rescue, combat and support helicopters including MV22 Ospreys and CH-53E Super Stallions. US Marine Captain Erik Carlson, an F-35 pilot, said the Americans loved working with the Australian military. “We work with the Australians a lot and we love that relationship,” he said. “It’s good to have close friends down here.”

>>19044241 Video: American navy ship USS America arrives in Brisbane - Brisbane is about to be invaded by a large military force ready to take on the town. The massive navy vessel USS America is in Australia for vital training exercises, but first, its crew is coming ashore. - 7NEWS Australia

>>19044256 Video: Why this American warship has just docked in Brisbane - Queensland has thrown out the welcome mat to 2,000 US marines and navy sailors ready to explore Brisbane. The USS America is the largest amphibious warship in the US Navy's 7th fleet. It has sailed in for a port call before heading north to participate in the military exercise Talisman Sabre. - ABC News (Australia)

>>19051042 Australia issues Elon Musk's Twitter with a 'please explain' notice over surge in online hate - Elon Musk's social media platform Twitter has been issued with a demand from Australian authorities for information on what it is doing to tackle online hate. Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said about one-third of the complaints her agency received about online hate involved content on Twitter, noting a surge in harmful posts since the Tesla chief bought the platform last year. Twitter has 28 days to comply with the "please explain" notice, or face fines of almost $700,000 for every day it misses the deadline.

>>19051054 Australia to Elon Musk: Explain how you’re dealing with hate on Twitter - Australia has ordered Twitter to explain what it is doing to tackle online hate, saying there had been a sharp increase in “toxicity and hate” since Elon Musk took over the company last year. Twitter could be fined as much as $475,000 a day if it doesn’t comply, under an online safety law that Australia touted as world-first when it was introduced in 2021. Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety commissioner and a former Twitter executive, said Thursday that she issued the notice after a “worrying surge of hate online” and specifically a sharp increase in reports of serious online abuse since Musk bought the company in October. - Frances Vinall - washingtonpost.com

>>19051106 Ukraine moves to become a cashless society in anti-corruption bid - Ukraine says it wants to make its economy cashless as soon as possible to stamp out corruption and secure the hundreds of billions of dollars from private investors that it will need to rebuild after the war. The plans follow the direct urging to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky by Australia’s richest man, Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest, who has unveiled a new investment fund for Ukraine’s reconstruction, kick-started with $US500 million ($735 million) paid for via his private company, Tattarang.

>>19051159 George Papadopoulos Tweet: The Australian “diplomat” who lied about me (the reason the sham crossfire investigation investigation went nowhere) also just happened to earmark $25 million to the Clinton foundation while he was Australia’s foreign minister. Are you catching on yet?

>>19058367 Russian Federation launches High Court action against decision to block new embassy in Canberra - The Russian Federation has officially launched legal action in the highest court in Australia as it challenges the government’s decision to block its plans for a new embassy in Canberra. Lawyers acting on behalf of Russian Ambassador Alexey Pavlovsky filed an injunction in the High Court on Friday afternoon against new laws that tore up the Kremlin’s lease for the proposed embassy site in Yarralumla. The Kremlin is challenging the new laws on constitutional grounds, arguing the commonwealth didn’t have just terms for terminating its lease, according to court documents.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188756

#30 - Part 12

Australian Politics and Society - Part 12

>>19058407 Germany invites Australia into elite ‘climate club’ - Australia will be invited to join a high-powered “climate club” for countries with ambitious emissions reductions goals when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese makes an expected visit to Berlin next month to meet with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Joining the German-led group would help Australia avoid potential European trade sanctions on countries that fail to take urgent action to tackle climate change. German ambassador to Australia Markus Ederer said the election of the Albanese government had opened up new opportunities for the countries to work together on low-emissions technologies and critical minerals exports. “With the arrival of a new government which is taking serious climate action, I think there’s a lot of convergence between our climate agendas,” he said.

>>19064520 Social media giants to face multimillion-dollar fines for spreading fake news - Social media giants will be hit with millions of dollars in fines if they repeatedly fail to remove disinformation and misinformation from their platforms under a major crackdown by the Albanese government. Communications Minister Michelle Rowland will on Sunday release draft legislation to give the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) powers to hold digital platforms to account for spreading harmful fake news. “Mis- and disinformation sows division within the community, undermines trust and can threaten public health and safety,” Rowland said. “The Albanese government is committed to keeping Australians safe online, and that includes ensuring the ACMA has the powers it needs to hold digital platforms to account for mis- and disinformation on their services.”

>>19064532 Air Force’s readiness chief sent into Home Affairs to fortify response to ‘cyber scumbags’ - The former head of the Royal Australian Air Force’s VIP operations and current air commander, Air Vice-Marshal Darren Goldie, will become the head of the National Office of Cyber Security and Australia’s cyber security coordinator within the Department of Home Affairs. The appointment is a major win for the military in the pecking order of Australia’s sprawling cyber estate. Under current cyber doctrine, the exfiltration and compromise of data and information from systems has largely been accepted as a norm of espionage and intelligence operations, while cyber attacks that seek to replicate kinetic attacks - such as destroying infrastructure or crashing planes - is largely interpreted as war-like. However, these boundaries are being pushed and tested by Russian-speaking actors who have created an extortion industry from ransomware attacks that both encrypt a target’s data and release it into the public domain.

>>19064564 Jacinta Allan, 12 members of the Australia Day Council of South Australia among those sanctioned by Russia - Several Australian businessmen, politicians, and journalists are now banned from visiting Russia in the latest sanctions imposed by the Russian Foreign Ministry. Russia has accused those named of being part of a "Russophobic campaign by the collective West". Victorian Deputy Premier Jacinta Allan is the most notable politician on the list, which also has South Australian Labor MP Dana Wortley and Liberal Jing Lee. In response, the deputy premier said her office continued to stand with the Ukrainian community. "We stand with the people of Ukraine and their families and friends during this difficult time," she said.

>>19064687 Video: Former FBI director James Comey speaks on Trump, the mob and his latest book - Former FBI director, James Comey, is a polarising figure in the United States for his role in the 2016 election. Long before that Comey had a storied career as a prosecutor of bullet-proof integrity, including years spent chasing mafia bosses in New York. Now, he's written a novel based on those battles with the Cosa Nostra. It's called Central Park West and he speaks to 7.30’s Sarah Ferguson.

>>19064687 https://qalerts.pub/?q=comey - https://qalerts.pub/?q=corney - https://qalerts.pub/?q=downer - https://qalerts.pub/?q=crossfire

>>19075444 High Court throws out Russia's bid to stop Australian government taking control of embassy site - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has welcomed the High Court's decision to reject a bid by Russia to prevent the Commonwealth from taking control of a site it leased for a new embassy. Earlier this month, the federal government rushed through legislation terminating Moscow's tenancy on land adjacent to Parliament House, citing a possible national security risk. This morning High Court Justice Jayne Jagot threw out Russia's bid for an injunction, which would have prevented the Commonwealth from entering the disputed land while any court action was underway. Mr Albanese urged the Russian government to heed the High Court's advice and leave the site.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188757

#30 - Part 13

Australian Politics and Society - Part 13

>>19075501 Australia pledges $110 million in military and humanitarian support for Ukraine's battle against Russia - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced another military support package for Ukraine worth $110 million. Australia will send a further 70 military vehicles to Ukraine, including 28 armoured vehicles. It will also send artillery ammunition to Ukraine, and provide $10 million to the United Nations to help meet humanitarian needs in the country in the wake of Russia's invasion. Australia has already supplied Ukraine with support worth more than $650 million, including through providing Bushmaster armoured personnel carriers, drones and ammunition. Mr Albanese denied Australia's extra support for Ukraine was in response to an aborted mutiny in Russia at the weekend. He said Australia had offered additional support for Ukraine around every four months.

>>19075550 ‘I never was a spy’: Space consultant denies she’s a national security risk - An Irish space industry consultant detained in Australia after ASIO advised she posed a national security risk had repeated contact with a suspected Russian intelligence officer. An investigation by this masthead has identified the suspected Russian spy who ASIO has alleged tasked Irish national Marina Sologub with sharing sensitive information she gained by working in the space industry, first in Europe and then in Australia. In an exclusive interview on 60 Minutes, Sologub responded to the allegations levelled at her privately by ASIO - which refused to comment on her case - that she had been liaising with a suspected Russian intelligence officer who was working under diplomatic cover in Ireland. The officer has left Dublin and now works as a Russian trade official in Serbia. “He never told me, ‘Marina, I’m Russian intelligence.’ He was the junior guy,” said Sologub, who arrived in Australia in 2020. “I never shared any information with him.” - Nick McKenzie - theage.com.au

>>19079344 Musk's Twitter Faces Millions In Fines After New 'Disinformation' Laws Released In Australia - Elon Musk’s Twitter and other social media giants face the prospect of billions in fines after the Australian government released new laws targeting “misinformation and disinformation.” Following a months-long process, Communications Minister Michelle Rowland released the draft legislation that will grant the country’s media regulatory body, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), greater powers to stamp out harmful content online.

>>19082405 Taiwan frustrated by Australia’s decade-long trade snub over fears of China - Taiwan’s government is frustrated by Australia’s refusal to begin trade talks, as Anthony Albanese’s China trip becomes the latest in a litany of reasons given for Canberra’s decade-long snub of its fifth biggest trading partner. Taiwanese Foreign Minister Joseph Wu said that before President Tsai Ing-wen’s government was elected in 2016, it was told Australia wanted to sign a free-trade agreement with all of its major trading partners.

>>19094098 Corruption inquiry in Australia uncovers China links to state lawmaker - The former premier of Australia's most populous state engaged in corrupt conduct involving another lawmaker with whom she was in a secret romantic relationship, a years-long corruption inquiry that examined business dealings with China said on Thursday. The New South Wales Independent Commission into Corruption (ICAC) said in a report that Gladys Berejiklian had failed to notify the commission of her concerns that Daryl Maguire, a member of the state assembly with whom she was in a relationship during her term of office, may have engaged in corrupt conduct, and this undermined the ministerial code.

>>19103525 ‘Really angry’: Jacinda Ardern’s tensions with Scott Morrison revealed - New Zealand’s High Commissioner to Australia has revealed the simmering tensions between Jacinda Ardern and the Morrison government over migration policies, saying the NZ Prime Minister at one point became “really angry” with Scott Morrison. In an interview with AAP ahead of her retirement in December, Annette King said the 501 deportation policy - under which Australia deported NZ criminals even if they had never lived in NZ – was a particular bone of contention. In 2020 Dame Jacinda confronted then PM Morrison over the policy, telling him in front of reporters: “Do not deport your people and your problems”. “It certainly upset the Morrison government … the previous government was angry with her for raising it (even though) she had already warned that she would,” Dame Annette said. “She berated ScoMo on his treatment of New Zealanders. It was a really important signal back home to New Zealand.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188758

#30 - Part 14

Australian Politics and Society - Part 14

>>19103648 Nazi salute banned in Tasmania in an Australian first - Tasmania has become the first state to ban the Nazi salute, with six months jail for repeat offenders, in a move hailed by Jewish leaders but criticised by some free speech advocates. The landmark legislation, similar to that foreshadowed in Victoria amid a national debate on how to tackle Neo-Nazism, was passed by Tasmania’s upper house on Thursday night. “Nazis will not have a refuge here in Tasmania, and this sends a very clear message that Nazi symbols and salutes are not welcome in Tasmania,” said Attorney-General Elise Archer.

>>19104379 Labor Left to push Anthony Albanese on free abortions and to close Nauru - Anthony Albanese will be urged to provide free abortions across Australia, end offshore processing and close Nauru at Labor’s upcoming national conference, as the party membership pushes to government to adopt a more left-wing agenda. The Australian can reveal the motions that will be put up by Labor for Refugees and the influential women’s group Emily’s List, which is co-convened by NSW Left faction MP Sharon Claydon. With the Prime Minister reluctant to pursue abortion reform after the issue hurt Labor with faith communities in the 2019 election, Emily’s List will call for the ACT model of free abortions to be implemented nationally.

>>19104403 Video: Is she or isn't she a spy? The mother accused of working for Russia - The murky business of espionage usually exists in the shadows. But not this week on 60 MINUTES. In an intriguing and at times robust encounter, Tara Brown interviews a woman our spy agency, ASIO, claims is an agent tasked by Russia to gather sensitive information. Her name is Marina Sologub, and up until earlier this year she’d been living and working in Adelaide for three years. Now she’s in immigration detention waiting to be kicked out of the country. As Brown reports, cases like this would normally be kept top secret, but quite remarkably a very bold Sologub is refusing to go quietly, denying accusations she’s a spy, and vowing to fight her deportation to the bitter end.

>>19104595 Talisman Sabre Facebook Post - TS23 - Message from Exercise Directors - “An important part of a significant military exercise like Talisman Sabre are the planning events that are required to train together in dynamic situations across an area as large as northern Australia.” Hear from the Director of Exercise Talisman Sabre, Brigadier Damian Hill, as he shares more about the deep planning that goes into #TalismanSabre2023. This year, more than a dozen nations personnel are set to take part in the Australia-United States-led bilateral exercise. Partner Nations Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany and Indonesia will work together to enhance interoperability and strengthen key strategic partnerships.

>>19105135 OPINION: Anti-democrat Donald Trump Jr should not be allowed into Australia - "Donald Trump Jr, the eldest son of disgraced former US president Don­ald Trump and executive vice-president of The Trump Organisation, will be in Australia for a promotional tour speaking at events in Sydney on July 8 and continuing to Brisbane and Melbourne. But Trump should not be granted a visa to enter Australia because he fails multiple character test requirements under the Migration Act. Trump is an anti-democrat who encouraged the overturning of an election. He is a conspiracy theorist who spread misinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic. And he leads an organisation found guilty of tax fraud and document falsification. It is completely unacceptable to allow Trump Jr to come to Australia to give voice to the undermining of democratic elections, disrespecting the rule of law, denigrating people based on their race, religion or sexuality, and provoking political unrest. He has done all of these things and will do so in Australia, in search of a willing antipodean MAGA audience. The Migration Act is clear that if there is a risk the person entering Australia would vilify segments of the Australian community, harass or intimidate people, or “incite discord” with their views, then they should be denied entry on character grounds. There is plenty of evidence that this is what Trump Jr plans to do in Australia." - Troy Bramston, senior writer and columnist with The Australian - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188761

#30 - Part 15

Australian Politics and Society - Part 15

>>19109666 Video: Ukraine ambassador asks Foreign Minister Penny Wong to visit Kyiv amid calls for more weaponry - Ukraine's ambassador to Australia has made a public invitation for Foreign Minister Penny Wong to visit the besieged capital Kyiv and gain a fresh perspective on the conflict. Ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko told ABC Insiders he wanted Senator Wong to see the war for herself, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did in July last year. "When you visit it gives you a different angle," Mr Myroshnychenko said. "It gives you a bit of hands-on, I mean I've seen it with your prime minister, I was there on that trip … we were able to hear the stories out there, shared [by] people under the Russian occupation."

>>19114971 Defence, NT government strike deal to house Australian, international military personnel at Darwin's Howard Springs facility - The Northern Territory facility that gained national prominence as the "gold standard" for quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic will house thousands of troops from both Australia and overseas under a new lease agreement struck by the federal and NT governments. Under the deal, which is effective immediately, the 3,500 bed Howard Springs centre on the outskirts of Darwin will be converted to a defence accommodation precinct for housing Australian and international defence personnel.

>>19114980 Telstra partners with Elon Musk’s Starlink - Telstra has signed an agreement to become the first telco globally to offer rural broadband and voice services with Elon Musk’s satellite provider Starlink. Expected to launch in late 2023 with pricing to be confirmed, Telstra chief executive Vicki Brady said the offering would provide additional connectivity options for people and businesses where distance and terrain made it difficult to reach with existing networks. Starlink, a low earth orbit satellite system owned by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, was launched in Australia in 2021 and offers unlimited data for $139 per month along with a hardware fee of about $900. Its speeds are similar to that of NBN’s 100Mbps plans.

>>19115008 Australian firm sues Twitter for $665,000 for not paying bills - An Australian project management firm has filed a lawsuit against Twitter Inc in a U.S. court seeking cumulative payments of about A$1 million ($665,000) over alleged non-payment of bills for work done in four countries, court filings showed. Sydney-based private company Facilitate Corp on June 29 filed the suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District Of California claiming breach of contract over Twitter's failure to pay its invoices. Facilitate said from 2022 through early 2023, it installed sensors in Twitter's offices in London and Dublin, completed an office fit-out in Singapore, and cleared an office in Sydney. For those works, Twitter owed the company about 203,000 pounds, S$546,600 and A$61,300, respectively, Facilitate said.

>>19120629 Visa extension, climate finance agreements as Indonesian President Joko Widodo visits Sydney - Australia will ease some visa rules for Indonesians visiting the country, as part of a series of agreements struck during President Joko Widodo's visit to Sydney. The head of state met with business and political leaders today, in what is expected to be his last visit as president as he nears the end of a second and final term in office. Following bilateral talks, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced Indonesians will have immediate access to an extended visa from three to five years.

>>19120663 Talisman Sabre Facebook Post - Video: We are counting down the days to the start of #TalismanSabre2023! #TS23 is the largest bilateral military training exercise between Australia and the United States. This year, 12 other nations will take part in the exercise which will take place across the top end of Australia. Stay tuned for more announcements as the countdown begins!

>>19132052 Donald Trump Jr’s Australian speaking tour delayed, promoter says - A speaking tour from the son of the former US president Donald Trump has been delayed, the tour promoter announced on Wednesday. Donald Trump Jr was to speak at events in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, kicking off this Sunday. However Turning Point Australia announced on Wednesday that “due to unforeseen circumstances” the appearances would be postponed. “Ticket holders are urged to hold onto their tickets, with details of the rescheduled date to be confirmed in the coming days,” the announcement said. “Ticket holders will be contacted directly … with details.” In a Facebook post on Wednesday, Turning Point Australia wrote, “It seems America isn’t the only country that makes it difficult for the Trumps. “Hold onto your tickets, this is a short delay nothing more #CancelCulture. “Apologies for any inconveniences especially those who had long travel plans.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188764

#30 - Part 16

Australian Politics and Society - Part 16

>>19132058 Donald Trump jnr cancels anti-cancel culture tour amid visa doubts - "Donald Trump’s eldest son has cancelled a planned speaking tour of Australia just days before he was due to arrive in the country amid doubts over whether the Albanese government would grant him a visa. Donald Trump jnr was scheduled to make appearances in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne between July 9 and July 11, but organisers abruptly announced on Wednesday afternoon that the “landmark” tour had been postponed “due to unforeseen circumstances”. “Ticket holders are urged to hold on to their tickets, with details of the rescheduled date to be confirmed in the coming days,” event organiser Turning Point Australia said in a statement posted to the tour website. Some commentators, including former Labor speechwriter and The Australian columnist Troy Bramston, had called for Trump jnr’s visa to be cancelled on character grounds because of his role in promoting misinformation about voter fraud in the 2020 US presidential election and the COVID-19 pandemic. A change.org petition calling for Trump jnr to be denied a visa to Australia had attracted 21,725 signatures." - Matthew Knott - theage.com.au

>>19132063 Clare O’Neil forced to delete tweet calling Donald Trump Jr ‘big baby’ - Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil has been forced to delete a tweet in which she attacked the son of former US President Donald Trump as a “sore loser” and “just a big baby, who isn’t very popular” after the Prime Minister’s Office intervened and directed her to take it down. Turning Point Australia, the organisers for the tour, announced on Wednesday that the speaking engagements in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane would be postponed due to unforeseen circumstances. The touring company released a statement detailing the postponement was due to a “the delay in the arrival of a visa for Donald Trump Jr to enter Australia.” Ms O’Neil on Thursday took to Twitter to respond to the claims and remained firm that the eldest son of former US president Donald Trump was granted a visa. “Geez, Donald Trump Jr is a bit of a sore loser. His dad lost an election fair and square - but he says it was stolen,” she wrote. “Now he’s trying to blame the Australian Government for his poor ticket sales and cancelled tour. Donald Trump Jr has been given a visa to come to Australia. “He didn’t get cancelled. He’s just a big baby, who isn’t very popular.” Immigration Minister Andrew Giles backed the comments, suggesting the tour was cancelled due to ticket sales.

>>19132069 Clare O’Neil calls Donald Trump Jr a ‘big baby’ in deleted tweets - Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil has been accused of childishness for calling Donald Trump’s eldest son a “sore loser” and a “big baby, who isn’t very popular” in a since-deleted series of posts on Twitter. In two tweets sent on Thursday morning, O’Neil said: “Geez, Donald Trump Jr is a bit of a sore loser. “His dad lost an election fair and square - but he says it was stolen. “Now he’s trying to blame the Australian government for his poor ticket sales and cancelled tour.” O’Neil, who has cabinet responsibility for immigration, continued: “Donald Trump Jr has been given a visa to come to Australia. He didn’t get cancelled. He’s just a big baby, who isn’t very popular.” She later deleted the tweets. Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson reposted the deleted tweets and said: “It’s good to see these childish tweets have now been deleted. “The minister should leave the woke tweets to Labor backbenchers and get back to focusing on the serious national security challenges facing Australia.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188767

#30 - Part 17

Australian Politics and Society - Part 17

>>19139080 Gender-sceptic doctor launches human rights challenge to ‘cheerleading’ trans pronouns policy - A doctor’s right to object on medical grounds to the unquestioning affirmation of children as the opposite gender faces a human rights test in Queensland, with a suspended psychiatrist filing a complaint against the state’s children’s hospital over transgender health policies. Jillian Spencer alleges she was prevented from adopting a neutral therapeutic approach and instead forced to comply with gender-­affirming polices that risked causing substantial harm to young ­people, during the course of her employment as a senior staff specialist in the consultation liaison psychiatry team at the Queensland Children’s Hospital. In a complaint lodged with the Queensland Human Rights ­Commission, Dr Spencer, who is openly critical of gender-affirming policies, reveals that she was subject to lawful employment directions that required her to use gender-­affirming pronouns at all times in her practise of medicine and ­refrain from dissuading any child and their family from seeking a ­referral to the hospital’s children’s gender clinic, which frequently prescribes puberty blockers and cross sex hormones to young teenagers.

>>19139143 Endocrinologists’ challenge to the medical transition of gender-questioning children silenced by medical college - The medical affairs committee of the nation’s peak endocrinology society opposed the prescription of hormones to children and expressed deep reservations over the lack of evidence underpinning transgender affirmative medicine standards of care adopted by children’s hospitals in explosive advice to a peak medical college. The Medical Affairs Committee of the Endocrine Society of Australia - a subspecialty college of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians – did not support the endorsement of gender-affirmative standards of care developed by influential doctors at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, pointing to concerns about the lack of evidence behind practices including placing children on puberty blockers at a very young age. The views of the ESA’s medical affairs committee are contained in a letter to the RACP, which in late 2019 was consulting the profession at the request of then health minister Greg Hunt who had requested advice on the treatment of gender dysphoria in children and adolescents.

>>19139214 Slapdown for ‘big baby’ Donald Trump Jr tweet by Clare O’Neil - Anthony Albanese’s office has stepped in and directed a senior cabinet minister to delete a tweet attacking Donald Trump and his son, with foreign policy experts describing the incident as a diplomatic “own goal”. Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil accused Donald Trump Jr of attempting to blame the Albanese government for delays in his Australia tour, calling him a “sore loser” and a “big baby”. She also attacked the former US president over his election fraud claims, saying he “lost an election fair and square”. The Australian understands Ms O’Neil deleted the tweets at the direction of the Prime Minister’s office. Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge said Ms O’Neil’s comments were “an unnecessary own goal” that lacked foresight given Mr Trump may be the Republican nominee for the White House at next year’s election. Mr Shoebridge said the election of Mr Trump for a second term was “absolutely a credible scenario”.

>>19139383 EXCLUSIVE: Donald Trump Jr accuses Labor of 'lying' about why he cancelled his tour - and suggests a sinister reason for delaying his visa: 'They want to shut down conservative voices' - Donald Trump Junior has hit back at 'lies' from the Government about why he postponed his tour at the last minute - and suggested Labor delayed approving his visa because they want to shut down conservative voices. Trump Jr. confirmed he'd already sold 8,000 tickets to his speaking tour before it was cancelled at the last minute - and called Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil a 'coward' after she risked escalating the matter into a full-blown diplomatic crisis between the U.S. and Australia after posting a series of juvenile Tweets. The Prime Minister's Office ordered O'Neil to delete a series of Tweets in which she called Trump Jr. a 'sore loser and a big baby' - and claiming the reason he cancelled his tour was because of 'poor ticket sales' rather than visa delays. Trump Jr. exclusively told Daily Mail Australia her comments were 'ridiculous lies' and perpetuated 'fake news' - as he blamed the Labor Government for his decision to postpone the tour. 'The tyrannical Left doesn't believe people have the right to freedom of expression and will do anything to shutdown conservative voices, but we will not bow down to them,' he said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188773

#30 - Part 18

Australian Politics and Society - Part 18

>>19148913 Ex-Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage says Clare O’Neil’s tweets criticising Trumps were ‘utterly stupid’ - Former Brexit Party leader and British broadcaster Nigel Farage has questioned the calibre of cabinet ministers in Australia following the social media furore that erupted after Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil posted multiple tweets attacking Donald Trump and his son. Mr Farage said the minister’s comments on social media were “utterly stupid” and it “looked comical, it’s so bad it’s funny”. Mr Farage, a presenter at conservative British news channel GB News, also criticised Australia’s cancel culture after a change.org petition drew more than 22,000 signatures calling for Mr Trump Jr to be stopped from getting an Australian visa. “That’s the embodiment of cancel culture, it’s not only disagreeing with what you have to say or what I think you are going to say, it’s saying I don’t think you’ve got the right to say it,” Mr Farage said. “It really worries me that we have young activist students who don’t seem to be taught in the western world anymore what critical thinking is.”

>>19148947 Trump promises to lift the shroud on JFK murder, releasing all classified documents - Donald Trump has promised to release all the remaining top secret documents surrounding former president John F Kennedy’s assassination, after Joe Biden for the third year in a row refused to release a remaining fraction of them. Former president Trump, the front runner for the Republican party’s 2024 presidential nomination, said he would “declassify and unseal all JFK assassination related documents”, despite himself having withheld their release during his presidency. “It‘s been 60 years, time for the American people to know the TRUTH!” Mr Trump said on his social media platform Truth.

>>19154732 Keating’s swipe at NATO leader Jens Stoltenberg as Albanese flies to Lithuania for summit - Paul Keating has savaged NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg as a “supreme fool” and claimed the military alliance had impeded peace since the Cold War, causing a diplomatic headache for Anthony Albanese ahead of his attendance at the summit of North American and European leaders. With the Prime Minister invited to the summit in Lithuania as part of a grouping of Indo-Pacific guests, Mr Keating signalled his opposition to Australia’s attendance by declaring NATO had no business expanding its footprint into Asia. In a statement released on Sunday, Mr Keating said it was a mistake for Mr Stoltenberg and NATO nations to compare China with Russia. “Stoltenberg, in his jaundiced view, overlooks the fact that China represents 20 per cent of humanity and now possesses the largest economy in the world,” Mr Keating said. “And has no record of attacking other states, unlike the United States, whose bidding Stoltenberg is happy to do.”

>>19154748 Anthony Albanese calls NATO chief a 'friend of Australia' after Paul Keating's 'supreme fool' comment - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described the head of NATO as a "friend" of Australia's while trying to distance himself from former prime minister Paul Keating who labelled the secretary-general a "complete fool". Last night Mr Keating issued a statement that slammed NATO's planned expansion into Asia, warning it could bring the "militarism of Europe" into the region. "Exporting that malicious poison to Asia would be akin to Asia welcoming the plague on itself," Mr Keating wrote. He went on to describe NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg as a "supreme fool". "Stoltenberg by instinct and by policy is simply an accident on its way to happen," he said.

>>19154758 Anthony Albanese agrees $1bn defence deal with Germany - Anthony Albanese has announced an export deal with Germany for more than 100 Boxer heavy weapon carriers, worth more than $1bn to the Australian economy. On arrival in Berlin where he will meet with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz later today (AEST). the Prime Minister said the two countries were ready to announce a series of deals including that involving the Boxers. These will be produced by the German company Rheinmetall in Redbank, Queensland, which employs 1000 people. Mr Albanese said: “This will be one of our largest ever exports, it will guarantee the 1000 jobs there in Queensland will go into the future and it’s worth in excess of $1bn to the Australian economy. “This will boost our sovereignty, increase our defence capability and boost our economy. This is a great outcome, the first outcome of quite a few ready to announce tomorrow with our friends here in Germany and I thank Chancellor Scholtz for his very kind invitation to come here to commemorate these agreements we will enter into.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188778

#30 - Part 19

Australian Politics and Society - Part 19

>>19154790 German troops join US in Australian war games - Hundreds of German troops will arrive in Australia this week and join with the United States and 11 other nations in extensive military exercises as a part of a “productive relationship that we are developing with our German friends” to boost defence in the Indo-Pacific. The German military will take part in the comprehensive exercise, called Exercise Talisman Sabre, in Jervis Bay, NSW, Darwin and across Queensland alongside troops from Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand Papua New Guinea, Tonga, the United Kingdom and Canada. As well, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand will be observers. Talisman Sabre is to test planning and conducting combined and joint military operations to improve combat readiness and interoperability between Australian and United States’ forces and other partner nations.

>>19154951 Plastic surgeons call for age limit as young teenagers line up for ‘top surgery’ - Leading surgeons are calling for the national medical regulator to step in to set “clear and specific guidelines” on gender-affirming surgery, including consideration of whether the age at which transgender adolescents are ­legally allowed to go under the knife should be raised to 18. Australia is one of the most liberal countries in the world in sanctioning children under 18 to get double mastectomies, a practice that is rare but appears to be increasing despite only a handful of surgeons around the country being willing to perform such procedures. The case of a 15-year old child in Queensland having “top surgery” has prompted Mark Ashton, a plastic surgery specialty elected counsellor to the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and Melbourne University professor of surgery, to question the lack of regulations.

>>19160207 NATO summit: Australian eyes in the sky join fight for Ukraine - Australia will send one of its most sophisticated surveillance planes - the Royal Australian Air Force E-7A Wedgetail aircraft – to Europe for six months to help protect key wartime logistics hubs, in a significant step up of assistance to Ukraine. The deployment of the Wedgetail will help protect the uninterrupted delivery of key military and humanitarian assets into Ukraine via Poland and other neighbouring countries. As many as 100 Australian military personnel will be based in Germany, from where the plane will operate, for the six months to fly and service it. The Australian government said in a statement: “Along with ongoing military and humanitarian assistance support, this ­deployment reinforces that Australia remains a key partner in international endeavours to assist Ukraine repel Russia’s illegal and immoral attack. This deployment will help to ensure the continued and uninterrupted flow of military and ­humanitarian assistance into Ukraine.”

>>19160241 Video: Major changes to abortion access as all doctors and nurse practitioners can prescribe - All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it as new rules are brought in. Until now, prescribers and dispensers of the two-part medical abortion treatment needed extra certification or registration, meaning only about 10 per cent of doctors and 30 per cent of pharmacists are currently able to deal with the pill. But from August 1, restrictions around 'MS-2 Step' will be removed, in a move the government says will “improve equitable access to healthcare for all Australians”. Nurse practitioners - who represent about one per cent of nurses – will also be able to prescribe the medications under the PBS. The changes follow an application from MS Health to the Therapeutic Goods Administration. The pill, known as RU486 overseas, was first registered by the TGA a decade ago for use on pregnant women up to nine weeks gestation. Assistant Health Minister Ged Kearney said it was a “very safe, very practical move” that met global guidelines.

>>19160276 What is abortion drug mifepristone MS 2-Step and who will be able to prescribe it under new access rules in Australia? - Major changes to abortion access in Australia will take effect from August 1, with all doctors and nurse practitioners to be authorised to prescribe them. Here’s everything you need to know: What is the abortion pill MS-2 Step? - When do the abortion pill changes take effect? - Who has prescribed abortion pills up until now? - How much do abortion drugs cost? - What is MS Health? - What has been the government’s response?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188783

#30 - Part 20

Australian Politics and Society - Part 20

>>19160276 Q Post #3405 - Reality is hard to swallow. Do you know the market price for a fetus? Correlation of market price & days old of fetus/baby? As age (days) increases so does the value? D's block 'born alive' bill? Planned Parenthood political donations? What party? Do you believe this has anything to do w/ a Woman's Right to Choose? Welcome to the Real World. Q - https://qanon.pub/#3405

>>19165867 Anthony Albanese gives Volodymyr Zelensky 30 more Bushmasters at NATO summit in Lithuania - Anthony Albanese will give Ukraine an extra 30 Bushmasters after telling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Australia “will remain with you for as long as this takes for you to restore your sovereignty and repel this brutal invasion’’. Meeting the war-torn country’s leader for a second time, the Prime Minister said providing the latest batch of Bushmasters would bring the tally of the vehicles being used by grateful Ukrainian soldiers to 120. So far, the federal government has provided military assistance of more than $710m, with total support, including humanitarian aid, at $890m. Mr Zelensky told Mr Albanese: “Australia stands shoulder to shoulder with our people and we appreciate that support.”

#30 - Part 21

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 1

>>18965947 British cardiologist calls for mRNA vaccines to be suspended due to heart risks - A controversial British cardiologist has called for the Pfizer and Moderna Covid shots to be suspended in Australia until the risk of heart complications is better understood, saying prior vaccines “have been pulled for much less”. Dr Aseem Malhotra, who has emerged as one of the most high-profile figures in the anti-vaccine movement and is currently in Australia on a speaking tour, said it was a “no-brainer” and accused the medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), of ignoring the clear safety signal from its own reporting system once the rollout was well under way. “People can be forgiving if new information comes in, we know people make mistakes - but once you get that information back, them not acting on it … the problem is the cover-up is worse than the crime,” he said.

>>18977760 Victoria health chief Brett Sutton resigns after leading state Covid response - The man behind Victoria’s controversial Covid response which saw much of the state shuttered for months has resigned. Chief health officer Brett Sutton announced he would be stepping down as the state’s health czar after more than three years in the top role. Mr Sutton joined the Health Department in 2011, before leading the state’s response to the Covid pandemic from late-2019. Victoria was subjected to some of the largest Covid waves throughout the pandemic, with six lockdown measures being implemented. While widely seen as being instrumental in curbing Covid cases, tight lockdown laws drew criticism throughout Mr Sutton’s tenure. Victorian Premier Dan Andrews defended the state’s response late-last year, stating the pandemic presented “difficult decisions” for leaders. “These decisions were not made lightly, and they were the subject of debate and discussion and very careful consideration,” Mr Andrews said.

>>19011116 Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists the first to be sickened by Covid-19 - "Three Wuhan scientists toying with the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2 were the first to contract Covid-19, as evidence the virus came from a lab leak rather than a live animal trade market grows. An investigation by journalists Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi published on the Substack newsletter Public reported that Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu were identified as “patients zero” of the virus by US government sources. They were involved in “gain-of-function” research on SARS-like coronaviruses. The investigation confirms the three WIV members were directly in the lab and were involved in collecting and experimenting with viruses and fell sick in late 2019. Mr Hu, who led WIV’s gain-of-function research, is believed to be a close contact of Shi Zhengli, the Chinese virologist who focuses on coronaviruses of bat origin." - Tricia Rivera - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188784

#30 - Part 22

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 2

>>19011137 Wuhan scientist Ben Hu, Covid’s ‘patient zero’, an explosive development in pandemic origin story - "Three unknown Chinese scientists working inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s coronavirus unit fell sick with Covid-like symptoms around November 2019. One of them, a relatively junior scientist, had started a new project earlier that year that was examining whether two new bat coronaviruses could infect humans. Just months into his experiments, that involved risky gain-of-function research, that can make viruses more transmissible and more virulent to humans, he fell sick, along with two of his colleagues. The names of the three scientists who fell ill with Covid-like symptoms have been published by overseas independent media outlets called Public and Racket. Those scientists are Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu. This is as close as we’ve come to explosive intelligence about patient zero. The United States, British and Australian governments should demand answers from China about whether these experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded by Beijing, did in fact lead to the creation and spread of Covid-19." - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19099510 Brett Sutton announced as Victorian of the Year - Victoria’s outgoing chief health officer professor Brett Sutton has been declared Victorian of the year. Dr Sutton, who recently announced he would leave the state’s Department of Health after 10 years and resign as CHO after four years in the job, accepted the gong in a Victoria Day Council Awards ceremony at Melbourne Town Hall on Friday. Dr Sutton was a controversial figure during the Covid-19 pandemic, when his health advice allowed Premier Daniel Andrews to impose curfews, playground bans and 262 days of lockdown. The Covid-19 rules lead to Melbourne being crowned the most locked down city in the world, along with other restrictions that included travel limits and homeschooling children. “It was a privilege to steward Victorians though very very choppy waters … the crisis of a lifetime. It was an achievement not of mine but of the people of Victoria,” Seven News reported Dr Sutton said.

#30 - Part 23

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 1

>>18934224 FBI restarts Julian Assange probe despite hopes of release - United States law enforcement authorities are seeking to gather new evidence about Julian Assange in an apparent effort to bolster their case against the WikiLeaks founder, even as hopes rise among his supporters that a diplomatic breakthrough could soon see him released from prison. The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age can reveal that agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) last week sought to interview acclaimed novelist Andrew O’Hagan about his time working as a ghostwriter on Assange’s autobiography over a decade ago. Assange’s brother Gabriel Shipton said it appeared US prosecutors were trying to prepare a new indictment or a superseding indictment against Assange. “It shows they understand how weak the charges against Julian are and are trying to strengthen them,” he said.

>>18934231 Australia 'not aware' of fresh FBI probe into Assange - Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus was not contacted about a new FBI probe into WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange. US authorities are reportedly trying to gather new evidence against Mr Assange, and have requested to interview novelist Andrew O'Hagan about his previous work as a ghostwriter on the Australian's autobiography. Asked if he was aware of a new investigation, Mr Dreyfus said he was not until he read reports about it on Thursday morning. "Our position has been very clear for a long time now that this matter has gone on for too long, and that remains our position," he told ABC Radio. "We're doing everything we can to make sure that it's brought to an end."

>>18977745 Julian Assange will fight UK High Court decision in last legal option against extradition to the US - Australian Julian Assange will fight to overturn a United Kingdom High Court ruling that rejected his appeal against extradition to the United States. The 51-year-old WikiLeaks founder is wanted in the US for espionage, where he faces 18 charges related to publishing of tens of thousands of military and diplomatic documents. Mr Assange last year lodged an appeal in the United Kingdom's High Court after the UK government signed an order authorising his extradition to the US. The court rejected his appeal in a three-page written decision from Justice Jonathan Swift issued this week. The latest High Court decision means the WikiLeaks founder is "dangerously close" to being extradited to the US, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188787

#30 - Part 24

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 2

>>19099473 Pope Francis meets family of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange - Pope Francis on Friday granted an audience to the wife of Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks who is behind bars in Britain and battling extradition to the United States. "The Holy Father has received in audience Mrs. Stella Assange, with family members," a Vatican statement said, with no further details. Stella Assange tweeted that her family was "overwhelmed" by the private audience, with a photo of herself dressed in black in St. Peter's Square and the hashtag #FreeAssangeNOW. She is fronting the campaign to have her husband released, but the Vatican did not say if this was discussed in the meeting or if Francis expressed any support for it. A Vatican spokesman said papal audiences are private affairs.

>>19104294 Pope meets with wife and family of Julian Assange, who says pontiff ‘concerned’ by his suffering - Pope Francis met with imprisoned WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s wife Stella, who said the pope’s gesture in receiving her was evidence of his “ongoing show of support for our family’s plight” and concern over her husband’s suffering. The Vatican didn’t release any details of the private audience, other than to confirm that it happened. The Argentine Jesuit pope has long expressed solidarity with prisoners, frequently visiting detainees on his foreign visits and prioritizing prison ministry when he was archbishop in Buenos Aires. The visit came as Stella Assange has been seeking to drum up political support for her husband’s cause, including a visit to his native Australia last month. She said there was a growing consensus that his continued detention was inhumane. Citing Australia’s intervention, human rights organizations and press freedom organizations, she said there was growing consensus that “what is being done to my husband is inhumane, that he is suffering, that he’s been in prison for four years for publishing true information revealing the killing of innocents and criminality and injustice.”

>>19160178 Julian Assange’s wife coy on plea deal: ‘The priority is for him to be freed’ - Julian Assange’s wife and chief campaigner, Stella Assange, has not ruled out her husband taking a plea deal to obtain his freedom, but said their priority remains convincing US President Joe Biden to drop the case against the WikiLeaks founder. The election of Biden to the White House and Anthony Albanese in Australia had sparked hopes among Assange’s supporters that the case, being prosecuted by the independent Department of Justice, could be abandoned. However, despite Albanese’s direct lobbying to Biden, this has not eventuated and in May, the prime minister said Assange himself needed to be part of the solution to resolve his case, signalling that the 52-year-old may have to accept a plea deal to obtain freedom. Asked if that was something they were considering, Stella Assange did not rule out the possibility but argued that the case should be dropped. “The priority is for him to be freed. Julian could have a catastrophic health incident any moment and he has been in a high-security prison for four years and three months and this is indefinite. The priority here is for all the people who are involved, and this is a political case that involves the Australian government, to come together and find a solution to free him.”

>>19165628 Julian Assange’s wife in clemency plea to Joe Biden - The wife of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is petitioning the British government’s decision to extradite him to the US, has appealed for clemency to President Joe Biden. The Australian publisher is the object of a US extradition request to face trial for divulging US military secrets about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “Biden could end this any time. It’s not in the administration’s interests for Julian to be tried during an election period,” Stella Assange said while speaking to the Geneva Press Club. “The smart thing” for Mr Biden to do “would be to just stop it and end it.” The issue of the extradition was “a Trump-era legacy” and represented “a threat” for democracy and the press, she said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188788

#30 - Part 25

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 1

>>18928680 Brittany Higgins is the wrong face for #MeToo - "With the board of inquiry into its third week of public hearings, it is becoming increasingly clear that Higgins is, and was, the wrong face for the #MeToo movement. Decisions by her, and those around her, to air her allegation in the media have undermined key features of our criminal justice system. Higgins, of course, has every right to go to the media first and police second. That was her strategy from the start. But that strategy, bolstered daily by her media supporters, came at a high cost to the police investigation, to the workings of the Office of the DPP, to the trial in the ACT Supreme Court and to subsequent events." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939581 Bruce Lehrmann discontinues defamation action against News Life Media - Bruce Lehrmann has discontinued his defamation action against News Life Media and news.com.au’s national political editor Samantha Maiden. Mr Lehrmann and News have reached an out-of-court settlement. News.com.au editor-in-chief Lisa Muxworthy said the two articles at the centre of the dispute remain online and have been updated with an editorial note. There is no apology or correction.

>>18939595 Sofronoff inquiry hears Heidi Yates knew of Higgins’s claim before it went public - Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates knew about Brittany Higgins’s sexual assault allegation a month before the former Liberal staffer publicly claimed that Bruce Lehrmann raped her inside Parliament House. And within three days of meeting Ms Higgins, Ms Yates was accompanying her to meetings with Anthony Albanese and Scott Morrison. Board chairman Walter Sofronoff KC is considering whether the Victims of Crime Commissioner acted in accordance with her relevant statutory framework in terms of the support she provided to Ms Higgins. During examination, Ms Yates defended her decision to be “the public face of support” for Ms Higgins by walking into the ACT Supreme Court, past a media pack, with her each day, despite its propensity to affect the accused’s presumption of innocence. Mr Sofronoff said by doing so, Ms Yates had decided to “really be the public face of that support”.

>>18939617 Victims of Crime Commissioner reveals ‘sensitive’ details about Brittany Higgins’ mental health - Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates has given harrowing evidence of calling an ambulance for Brittany Higgins when she believed there was an immediate threat to her life. In her first day of evidence at the inquiry into the investigation and prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann, Ms Yates has revealed she was reluctant to canvass the private matters but had sought Ms Higgins permission to do so. Detailing the multiple mental health incidents and hospitalisations that followed during her engagement with Ms Higgins, she revealed one incident followed the delay to the trial that followed Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech. She said despite repeated attempts to secure mental health counselling and support for Ms Higgins, she was struck throughout her contact with Ms Higgins by how isolated she was and how few people she trusted.

>>18939641 ‘She was not OK’: ACT victims advocate feared Higgins would collapse during speech - The ACT’s victims of crime commissioner, Heidi Yates, says she would have reconsidered standing next to Brittany Higgins during a televised speech after the Lehrmann rape trial was aborted if she’d known what she was going to say. Yates, who has been publicly accused of damaging the presumption of innocence of former Coalition staffer Bruce Lehrmann by her actions in the high-profile case, has told a public inquiry she was instead thinking of the possibility of his accuser collapsing while addressing the media shortly after the mistrial. “She was clearly not OK,” Yates told the inquiry into the handling of the case, explaining Higgins had suffered a panic attack when ACT Supreme Court Chief Justice Lucy McCallum cut short the trial on the morning of October 27, 2022, due to the misconduct of a single juror.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188791

#30 - Part 26

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 2

>>18954987 Video: Wilkinson, Higgins war-gamed ‘friendlies’ - Brittany Higgins and Lisa Wilkinson war-gamed how to recruit prominent politicians and media figures who could help give momentum to their upcoming interview on The Project, as the TV host made suggestions to the former Liberal staffer about how to frame her story. The more than five-hour session, which also involved Ms Higgins’ boyfriend David Sharaz and Wilkinson’s producer Angus Llewellyn, was recorded on January 27, 2021 a few days before they filmed the interview that was broadcast on February 15 revealing Ms Higgins’ claims she had been raped in Parliament House. The group brainstormed MPs who would “fire questions” in question time over the alleged sexual assault, highlighting Labor leaders Anthony Albanese and Tanya Plibersek as key players.

>>18955007 Video: Bruce Lehrmann says he hasn't ruled out suing Brittany Higgins for defamation in first TV interview since being accused of rape - Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann says he has not ruled out suing Brittany Higgins personally for defamation. Mr Lehrmann made the comments in his first television interview since Ms Higgins accused him of raping her at Parliament House in 2019. Mr Lehrmann's trial was abandoned due to juror misconduct last year. There are no findings against him. Speaking to 7NEWS Spotlight, Mr Lehrmann strenuously denied raping Ms Higgins but acknowledged that many people did not believe him. "I accept that there's going to be 50 per cent of the country, probably more, that thinks I'm a rapist," he said.

>>18955017 ‘Brittany Higgins lied to save her job’: Bruce Lehrmann - Bruce Lehrmann has accused Brittany Higgins of lying about being raped to save her job, as he announced he had not ruled out suing the former Liberal staffer for defamation. In a new, wide-ranging interview, Mr Lehrmann spoke of how her sexual assault allegation forced him to contemplate suicide. The Spotlight episode also included footage of Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann arriving at Parliament House on the night of the alleged rape. He claimed Ms Higgins intentionally told senator Linda Reynolds’ chief of staff, Fiona Brown, the “white lie” that he had raped her in order to keep her job after seeing him get sacked.

>>18955049 ‘Malicious’: ABC deliberately tried to prejudice my rape trial, says Bruce Lehrmann - The ABC deliberately tried to prejudice Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial when it broadcast an address by Brittany Higgins and Grace Tame at the National Press Club knowing he had been publicly named and charged, according to documents just filed in the Federal Court. Mr Lehrmann first filed his claim against the ABC in April but now claims it broadcast the Press Club event with “an improper motive”, namely to prejudice upcoming criminal proceedings against him, and that the broadcaster’s recklessness was so extreme that it amounted to “wilful blindness and constituted malice”.

>>18955072 ‘It’s pretty sick’: Bruce Lehrmann denies giving Brittany Higgins bruise in tell-all interview - Bruce Lehrmann has accused Brittany Higgins of having “fabricated” a photo of a bruise she claimed he inflicted during an alleged sexual assault. In February 2021, Ms Higgins spoke on The Project with host Lisa Wilkinson in an explosive interview regarding the alleged rape, during which she shared a disturbing image of a large bruise on her leg. On Sunday evening, Mr Lehrmann addressed the photograph in his own sit-down interview on the Channel 7’s Spotlight program, denying the authenticity of the image. “It was fabricated,” he said. “That’s the only explanation … or it’s a bruise from much later.” Ms Higgins said in her 2021 interview that the site of the bruise was “essentially where (Mr Lehrmann’s) leg pinned (her) down”.

>>18955096 Video: Tanya Plibersek hits back over Brittany Higgins question - A senior politician singled out by Lisa Wilkinson as a “friendly MP” likely to help fuel momentum for Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation in question time says she was never approached and would not have accepted being told what to ask. Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek was asked five times by Natalie Barr whether or not she had been approached to help fuel the story when she appeared on Sunrise on Monday morning. She said she reached out to Ms Higgins after she made her sexual assault allegations public two years ago. Ms Plibersek, who at the time was a senior opposition frontbencher, said she did not recall if the former political staffer had spoken to her about “firing up” specific questions during question time.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188792

#30 - Part 27

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 3

>>18960074 Disturbed and disappointed: Brittany Higgins’ angry letter to Lisa Wilkinson - Five days after Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations interview aired on The Project she wrote an angry letter to host Lisa ­Wilkinson accusing her of ­putting together a second program based on footage not used in the first, without her knowledge or consent. Ms Higgins writes that she is “disturbed and disappointed” that after making it clear she did not want another program “you have gone ahead and put one together anyway”.

>>18960084 Lisa Wilkinson denies briefing politicians about Brittany Higgins’ allegations - Anthony Albanese referenced allegations of rape made by Brittany Higgins in question time at least 20 times in the two months after the story broke but Lisa Wilkinson denies briefing politicians to promote her interview with the former Liberal staffer. Wilkinson on Monday said she had never spoken to any politician about the story following revelations she, Ms Higgins and Ms Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, war-gamed recruiting politicians to ask questions in question time over a five-hour brainstorming session just weeks before the story broke on February 15, 2021. In recorded audio of the meeting on January 27, 2021, Ms Higgins told Wilkinson she could find some “friendly MPs” who could fire questions in question time. Wilkinson told The Australian on Monday she did not approach Mr Albanese or other politicians about raising the allegations in question time. “Nor did I speak to any other politicians, their minders or apparatchiks,” she said.

>>18960098 The proper thing to do would be for Lisa Wilkinson to hand back her Logie - "The torch has turned on the Ten celebrity to reveal someone who appears hellbent on launching a #MeToo juggernaut, maybe picking up an award here and there, with a large side-serving of political partisanship, nasty invective about women and gratuitous snide gossip. What’s lacking is a sober, objective and fair search for truth. The proper thing to do would be for Wilkinson to hand in her Logie for her Higgins interview. That interview has been nothing but trouble for her, for the justice system, for good journalism and for people who deserved to be treated better." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18965791 Video: Tanya Plibersek 'briefed' by Brittany Higgins despite denials as Labor ministers come under fire for 'politicising case' - Labor ministers Tanya Plibersek and Katy Gallagher likely knew about Brittany Higgins' rape allegations before the story became public despite repeated denials. Ms Plibersek strongly refuted suggestions she had been in contact with Ms Wilkinson or knew of the case before it made public. Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson revealed secret text messages between Ms Higgins and ABC journalist Laura Tingle which showed Ms Plibersek had been briefed on the matter in early 2021.

>>18965804 Detective investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation complained he ‘didn’t like being threatened’ after call with her boyfriend David Sharaz - In fresh witness statements released by the Board of inquiry into the conduct of police, prosecutors and the Victim of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates, the distress of Detective Superintendent Scott Moller has been laid bare. He said Mr Sharaz threatened to go public with complaints over the speed of the rape investigation and sent emails to the detective investigating the case and the Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates. Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates details a conversation with Det Insp Boorman on the 30th of July, 2021. “It was my recollection that Mr Boorman was upset and said to me, words to the effect of 'I don’t like being threatened.'”

>>18966095 ‘Feed it to Katy’: Higgins-Sharaz text plots - A tranche of previously unseen text messages between Brittany Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz has revealed the pair planned to directly enlist the help of senior Labor figures to pursue Ms Higgins’ rape allegation and her belief the Coalition government covered it up. The texts reveal Mr Sharaz arranging “drops” for favoured reporters, organising meetings with Labor MPs to bolster support for Ms Higgins’ claims of a cover-up by the Coalition government and disparaging former prime minister Scott Morrison, saying “I still hate the c…”. Ms Higgins says: “He’s about to be f.cked over. Just wait. We’ve got him”. The texts reveal Mr Sharaz, a former journalist, boasting of his special relationship with now-Finance Minister Katy Gallagher.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188793

#30 - Part 28

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 4

>>18966103 THE AUSTRALIAN EDITORIAL - Texts show probe is needed into Higgins’ compensation award - "The emergence of highly charged text messages between Brittany Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz raises important questions about the behaviour of senior political figures that must be answered. The plotting and conversations revealed in the text messages are of vital public interest. They go to the heart of how politics is played and how events that are the proper preserve of the criminal justice system can be exploited for personal and political gain. The extent of what appears to be collusion between Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz and political figures demands that a proper investigation be launched into a decision to award more than $2m in compensation to Ms Higgins with what could be considered a questionable regard for proper process."

>>18971017 Anthony Albanese defends Katy Gallagher amid involvement with Brittany Higgins allegation and compensation - Pressure is mounting for Anthony Albanese and key ministers in his government to disclose whether they had any involvement in helping Brittany Higgins pursue her rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann after it was revealed the former political staffer and her boyfriend David Sharaz strategised how to make use of senior Labor figures. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher sits at the centre of the pair’s scheming, with Mr Sharaz having boasted about his friendship with the senator to Ms Higgins. Texts published in The Australian reveal Mr Sharaz and Senator Gallagher were in touch and that she was “angry and wants to help” before the rape allegation was made public.

>>18971045 Peter Dutton backs move to refer Brittany Higgins’ settlement to the National Anti-Corruption Commission - Peter Dutton has backed a move to refer the confidential Commonwealth payout made to former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins to the new federal integrity watchdog for investigation. The Opposition Leader told 2GB Radio on Thursday that Anthony Albanese and other senior figures in the federal government had questions to answer about the payout and what they knew about Ms Higgins’ rape allegation and when. “It just seems that as each day goes by, there are more questions than there are answers and I think that’s creating a lot of suspicion understandably,” Mr Dutton said.

>>18977050 Video: Sharri Markson: Deep links between Brittany Higgins and Labor show how allegations were 'exploited for political purposes' - Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson has again exposed another link between the ALP and Ms Higgins and her now-fiancé David Sharaz. Emma Webster was seen throughout the Lehrmann trial side-by-side with Ms Higgins offering her support. Ms Higgins even described the former Labor staffer as a “wise advisor”. While Ms Webster was mentioned throughout the trial as a close friend of Ms Higgins and a lobbyist her deep Labor connections were hardly ever revealed. Before starting at Hawker Britton as a senior lobbyist, Ms Webster was a top advisor for former prime minister Julia Gillard, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews and Ms Gallagher when she was the ACT chief minister.

>>18977104 Katy Gallagher accused of misleading parliament, faces referral to corruption watchdog - Katy Gallagher is facing serious claims she misled parliament over an outburst in which she rejected assertions she was tipped off about Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations in 2021, as pressure builds on Anthony Albanese over Labor’s war-gaming with Ms Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz. The Finance Minister and senior government ministers went to ground on Thursday following the damaging fallout from text messages and audio recordings of Mr Sharaz and Ms Higgins boasting about contact and collusion with senior Labor figures. The Australian can also reveal texts between the couple that show Mr Sharaz’s response to their growing fame after the allegations became public, with Ms Higgins’ partner telling her they “exude power” and expressing his delight at organising her private meetings with former prime ministers Kevin Rudd and Malcolm Turnbull.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188795

#30 - Part 29

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 5

>>18977134 Labor sought to gain - it’s found political pain over Brittany Higgins saga - "The vexing domestic realities of being prime minister have landed squarely at Anthony Albanese’s feet this week after his return from overseas. Facing a war with inflation, battles with business, the spectre of recession and flagging support for the voice to parliament, Albanese now also faces a potential political scandal involving senior members of his government. Having had an easy ride for the first 12 months in office, Albanese is now under pressure, with the road ahead riddled with potential political potholes. The key to the Brittany Higgins text revelations is who among Albanese’s cabinet colleagues knew what and when. There are unresolved questions about what level of involvement members of the then Labor opposition had." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>18977148 David Sharaz is a ‘puppet master’ set on destroying the Liberals: Bruce Lehrmann - Bruce Lehrmann has claimed Brittany Higgins’ partner David Sharaz is a “puppet master” who orchestrated the release of the rape allegations against him, and says he has exploited Ms Higgins’ “fame” to engineer a campaign to support Labor and topple the ­Liberals. Mr Lehrmann’s scathing opinion of Mr Sharaz comes as leaked text messages reveal Mr Sharaz had used his connections with a former Labor media adviser to line up a job for Ms Higgins, following her resignation from the office of former attorney-general Michaelia Cash.

>>18977167 What we know about Brittany Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz - From support act to central player, the links of David Sharaz to Canberra and key figures in the Labor Party appear deeply personal. After a week of explosive revelations, the fiance of Brittany Higgins, David Sharaz has gone from support act to central figure in the saga involving her alleged rape at Parliament House. Who is David Sharaz and where did he work? Why did he meet with Lisa Wilkinson? Why is he under fire?

>>18977231 Video: Lisa Wilkinson caught mocking Liberals in secret tape - Ex-Project star Lisa Wilkinson has been caught on tape struggling to pronounce Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s name and mocking Liberals with Ten colleagues. The explosive audio was recorded by Project producer Angus Llewllyn on his mobile phone during a pre-interview discussion at a Sydney hotel on January 27, 2021. It includes Ms Wilkinson, Brittany Higgins, her partner David Sharaz and Llewllyn, an executive producer, drinking gin and tonics and mimosas and giving their ‘unplugged’ views on political leaders.

>>18977278 Wilkinson, Network 10 apologise to Jacinta Nampijinpa Price over leaked recording - Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 have apologised to Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price after leaked audio revealed Wilkinson struggling to pronounce the senator’s name in a manner she claimed was racist. But Ms Wilkinson also defended the “tenor” of the conversation, which Senator Price claimed was “derogatory”, as about how many female Liberal pre-selections “were in unwinnable positions”. “I sincerely apologise to Senator Price for any offence I may have caused. The conversation was private and not intended to appear as it has out of context and in the public arena,” she said in a statement released by Network 10.

>>18982556 Brittany Higgins: Gallagher, Wong ‘knew of rape claim’ - Former defence minister Linda Reynolds claims now-Finance Minister Katy Gallagher and now-Foreign Minister Penny Wong conceded to her that they knew about Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations before they were made public, hours after Senator Gallagher told the Senate she had no prior knowledge of the ex-staffer’s story. The Coalition will use parliament next week to ramp up pressure on Senator Gallagher over her knowledge of the rape allegation, as Anthony Albanese emphatically denies his minister misled the Senate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188796

#30 - Part 30

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 6

>>18982587 Video: Katy Gallagher admits she knew of Brittany Higgins’ rape claim, insists she didn’t ‘weaponise’ information - Under-fire Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has conceded she became aware of some details of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations before they were made public, but insists she did not do anything with the information. Facing the media for the first time since text messages surfaced showing Ms Higgins’ boyfriend, David Sharaz, claiming to have corresponded with the senator in the days leading up to the story breaking, Senator Gallagher said she had not misled the parliament. “I was responding to an assertion that was being made by the minister Reynolds at the time that we had known about this for weeks and had made a decision to weaponise it,” she said. “That is not true. It was never true. I explained that to Senator Reynolds that night and she accepted that explanation.”

>>18982744 EXCLUSIVE: Mystery as Grace Tame quietly removes gushing Brittany Higgins birthday tribute where she declared her 'a national hero' on Instagram - Grace Tame has deleted an Instagram post in which she declared Brittany Higgins was 'a national hero' and that the former political staffer was a 'warrior' and 'my friend'. The sexual abuse survivor made national headlines when she wrote the post on Brittany Higgins' birthday last year, but it has now mysteriously disappeared from her social media page. The rousing post, which was an emotional tribute to the former Liberal staffer, decried what Ms Tame called an 'insidious nationwide character assassination campaign' against Ms Higgins, saying her 'friend' had faced 'layered injustice' and 'relentless criticism'. Ms Tame's December 7, 2022 post, which has now vanished from all stories about it linked to her Instagram page, was supporting Ms Higgins as she spent her 28th birthday in a Queensland mental health clinic.

>>18987561 Cash demands answers as new Wilkinson recording surfaces - Michaelia Cash has demanded Network 10 release the full five-hour recording of a pre-interview with Brittany Higgins in which The Project journalist Lisa Wilkinson discusses with her covertly recording the Liberal senator, who was then her boss. It previously came to light Ms Higgins secretly recorded a phone call with Senator Cash - the then-employment minister and now opposition legal affairs spokeswoman - shortly after her resignation from Parliament House. “That a senior journalist in Lisa Wilkinson, and the producer of The Project, would actively have encouraged a young woman in a distressed situation to basically commit what is considered to be an illegal offence by recording a conversation with another person. Personally, I think Channel 10, The Project and Lisa Wilkinson have some very, very serious questions to answer.”

>>18987606 Minister under siege digs in for a fight - Federal Finance Minister Katy Gallagher was defiant and all but silent as she flew into a Canberra firestorm over her knowledge of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations, as Anthony Albanese’s ministers prepare to “back her to the hilt” against a Coalition onslaught in parliament this week. After a rapturous reception from Labor’s female activists at a Perth conference and the firm backing of the Prime Minister over the weekend, Senator Gallagher – wearing a “Women’s Spirit Network” hoodie – had no patience for questions as she landed back in the national capital. “I’ve got nothing to say,” she said repeatedly after touching down in the ACT.

>>18998319 Video: 'Those are the facts': Katy Gallagher denies misleading parliament over Brittany Higgins' allegations - Katy Gallagher has once again denied misleading parliament over her knowledge of Brittany Higgins' rape allegations, while the Australian Federal Police is assesing a complaint over the leaking of text messages in the matter. In a statement to the Senate, the federal finance minister repeated her assertion that, while she knew about Higgins' rape allegations before they became public, she had not misled parliament by telling an estimates committee three years ago that "no one had any knowledge" of the matter.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188797

#30 - Part 31

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 7

>>18998327 Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Lisa Wilkinson has not contacted her personally to apologise - The Indigenous senator who was mocked by Lisa Wilkinson as a “diversity pick” says the star journalist has not contacted her personally to apologise. Northern Territory CLP Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price lashed Wilkinson after audio emerged of the media personality making comments about the senator and struggling to pronounce her name during a pre-interview with Brittany Higgins and her partner David Sharaz. “She hasn’t personally made an apology to myself,” Senator Price told Sharri Markson on Sky News in her first interview since the incident. “If she was a real woman, I’d guess she’d ring me and personally apologise.”

>>18998342 Lehrmann court leak of Wilkinson recordings referred to police - Recordings of a five-hour meeting involving Brittany Higgins and journalist Lisa Wilkinson that were leaked to the media have been referred to police to investigate whether a contempt of court has been committed by passing on sensitive documents originally meant for the Bruce Lehrmann criminal trial. Thomson Geer law firm partner Marlia Saunders, who is acting for Network Ten in Lehrmann’s defamation proceedings, made a complaint to ACT Policing last Wednesday about material issued under subpoena for his criminal trial being aired in a televised interview with the Seven Network last week.

>>18998374 Video: Linda Reynolds sues Tanya Plibersek for defamation over Brittany Higgins comments - Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds has taken legal action against Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek, claiming Ms Plibersek defamed her in a television interview by stating she had “covered up” Brittany Higgins’ alleged rape. In a defamation concerns notice obtained by The Australian, Senator Reynolds accused Ms Plibersek of making false statements throughout the Channel 7 interview, that implied she had acted inappropriately during the investigation of Ms Higgins’ allegations and had attempted to “hide the commission of a criminal offence.” During the interview, which aired on Monday morning, Ms Plibersek stated: “The central point here is that a young woman made an allegation that she had been sexually assaulted in her workplace and that it had been inappropriately investigated, even covered up by her employers.”

>>19005424 Higgins, Sharaz and Wilkinson’s media campaign has backfired - "The beauty of the press is that it can’t be controlled. True, the supine, the stupid and the ideological end of the press can be manipulated, but eventually, in a free and open society with a competitive media, if a story is important enough, the press will usually ensure the truth comes out. That beauty became a problem for Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz. They made a rookie’s error when they set out on a strategy to use the media, instead of the criminal justice system, to press their case. Having tried to mould the media message, they cannot complain when some parts of the media - including this newspaper - decline to be shaped for their purposes. That was the gamble Higgins and Sharaz took. The effect of the Higgins-Sharaz media and political campaign was not merely to put themselves in the spotlight but to deprive Lehrmann of the presumption of innocence and the due process a normal criminal justice investigation would have given him." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19005438 Brittany Higgins explains leg bruise injury photo date discrepancy - Brittany Higgins’s explanation of why the photograph of a bruise on her leg did not match the timeline of her rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann has finally been revealed. File notes made by ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates reveal that Ms Higgins told senior police that the leg bruise image she had provided to them and high-profile journalists was actually a screenshot of the original picture which had been mysteriously wiped from her phone by someone else.

>>19005464 Finance Minister Katy Gallagher reveals she never declared conflict over multimillion-dollar compensation payout - Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has said she never declared a conflict of interest in relation to a multimillion-dollar compensation payout to Brittany Higgins because it “never crossed her desk.” News.com.au revealed in December that Ms Higgins’ legal team had entered negotiations over a multimillion-dollar personal injury claim. Asked whether she subsequently declared a conflict of interest given her close contact and the fact her own department was responsible for administering the payout, Ms Gallagher said there was never any need because the negotiation was kept at arms length. “If it had come to me, I would have declared a conflict but it didn‘t. It didn’t cross my desk,’’ Senator Gallagher said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188798

#30 - Part 32

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 8

>>19010860 Brittany Higgins’s elusive iCloud password delayed police completing brief of evidence for DPP - The investigation into Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation faced repeated delays because police could not access her cloud drives, which detectives believed contained potentially crucial evidence including emails and photos. New documents released by the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system reveal that senior detectives were desperate to access Ms Higgins’ iCloud account as they worked to complete their brief of evidence for the Director of Public Prosecutions in mid-2021. But after finally gaining access, weeks later, the material they sought was not there.

>>19010879 40 years of economic loss, end to political career reasons for Brittany Higgins $2.5m payout - Brittany Higgins claimed up to 40 years’ worth of economic loss and the end of her pursuit of a future political career were among the reasons she was due more than $2.5m in compensation from the government after allegedly being raped, a draft statement of claim has revealed. The revelations came as Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus refused to answer questions over Ms Higgins’ multi-million-dollar payout, which was provided without the consultation of former senior Liberal ministers at the centre of her claims.

>>19010895 Katy Gallagher was invited to wedding of David Sharaz - Katy Gallagher has confirmed that Brittany Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz invited her to attend his first wedding in 2018, as senior Labor ministers hid behind parliamentary procedural tactics to dodge questions about when they first became aware of the Higgins rape allegations. The Finance Minister came under fire for a second consecutive day in question time over her relationship with Mr Sharaz, involvement in Ms Higgins’ reported $3m payout, and who contacted her prior to the sexual abuse allegations airing on The Project in February 2021. Asked about her invitation to Mr Sharaz’s wedding to former wife Alexandra Craig, Senator Gallagher said: “I didn’t recall that until I heard it reported and I had to ask the people I worked with at the time. I got a lot of invitations to a lot of things, some I was able to go to and others I weren’t. I didn’t attend that one. The invitation was declined,” she told parliament.

>>19010904 Labor’s grotesque hypocrisy appears to know no bounds - "For political chutzpah, senior Labor MPs who weaponised a rape allegation win hands down. This week in the federal parliament, Australians were treated to one of the more grotesque displays of political hypocrisy, subterfuge and trickery. The same politicians who weaponised a rape allegation for their own brute political purposes are now in high dudgeon about the public exposure of material that points to the extent of Labor’s involvement in this scandal. This newspaper revealed texts that suggested, among other things, that Katy Gallagher received a transcript of The Project interview before it aired. Publishing that text meant we know now that Gallagher was sought out by David Sharaz and Brittany Higgins about the rape allegation - even before questions were put by The Project to people portrayed as the chief villains: Bruce Lehrmann, Linda Reynolds and her former chief of staff Fiona Brown." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19010931 Gallagher must come clean for the sake of the Albanese government - "Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has finally admitted she had prior knowledge of the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins, so why is it now good enough simply to take her word that she didn’t then weaponise the information? A thorough and independent inquiry needs to be held into whether Gallagher crossed the line. What seemed to have been forgotten by all the sorry actors in this sordid affair is that there was a criminal matter that needed to be tried. A rape was alleged and the victim and the accused deserved their day in court. Neither now have that closure. Both have been let down by a prosecutor and process that is itself under intense judicial scrutiny by Walter Sofronoff KC. Albanese would be well served by outing the truth and let Gallagher clear her name lest this does lasting damage to his own standing as Prime Minister." - Cameron Milner - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188800

#30 - Part 33

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 9

>>19010942 Video: Katy Gallagher apologises to Linda Reynolds over ‘hurt’ amid Brittany Higgins saga - Katy Gallagher has apologised to fellow senator Linda Reynolds for any hurt she endured during the protracted attention around Brittany Higgins’ alleging she was raped in her office in 2019. Claims which were dismissed by the ACT Supreme Court last year. “I’m sorry as Ms Reynolds is clearly upset about what happened to her,” she said. Senator Gallagher’s voice cracked and tears welled during day four of intense scrutiny from the coalition during Senate question time over her involvement and relationship with Ms Higgins and her partner David Sharaz. Senator Gallagher said she would have happily endured “this type of questioning” but was concerned for the toll the issue is having on women around the country.

>>19016452 Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyers’ furious letter to Sunrise over ‘false’ allegation - Lisa Wilkinson has lodged an official complaint with Channel 7, claiming a segment on its flagship morning program Sunrise aired “false” allegations against her. The former Project host’s lawyers took issue with the claim Wilkinson had “coached” Brittany Higgins to build a campaign against the man she accused of sexually assaulting her, Bruce Lehrmann. “That allegation is false. The material (falsely described in the report as ‘secret recordings’) published on Spotlight on the Seven Network on 4 June 2023 certainly does not justify that allegation,” the lawyers’ letter said.

>>19037048 Menslink CEO Martin Fisk tipped off Heidi Yates about Brittany Higgins’s rape claim - A Canberra charity boss who was nominated for a top Australian honour by David Sharaz and whose wife works for the Labor Party can be revealed as the mystery man who told Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates about Brittany Higgins’s rape claim weeks before it became public. Former Menslink chief executive officer Martin Fisk, whose wife Sandra is the ACT Labor Party’s operations manager, told Ms Yates in January 2021 that he was “working with a young woman who was about to make a sexual-assault disclosure” and that it “would likely attract national media attention”. Mr Fisk’s involvement reveals another puzzle piece as to “who knew what when”, while his wife’s strong links to the Labor Party, where she began working in 2012 while her Facebook friend ­Finance Minister Katy Gallagher was Territory chief minister, raise questions about the politicisation of Ms Higgins’ allegation.

>>19044075 DPP Shane Drumgold wanted ACT Police mistake in Brittany Higgins matter publicly exposed - ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold has extended his leave as new documents reveal the depths of his frustration with police ­investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation. Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates’s file notes, submitted to the inquiry, revealed Mr Drumgold wanted to publicly shame police for inadvertently providing Ms Higgins’ counselling notes to Mr Lehrmann’s lawyer. During a meeting on September 22, 2021, Mr Drumgold told Ms Yates that while he didn’t want the jury at Mr Lehrmann’s impending rape trial to suspect the detectives were incompetent, their mistake “needs to explode at some point”.

>>19058136 Sharaz and Higgins: ‘We’d become quite a twosome on game planning’ - "Brittany Higgins’ book appears to have been shelved. One look at the rough draft and it’s not hard to understand why. There are sound reasons many people are troubled by what they see as Higgins’s fixation on a political sex scandal - evidenced by texts, notes and in her draft book. Somewhere in this saga is an allegation of rape. And this is what makes this story such a dismal episode for the so-called women’s movement. People such as Heidi Yates, the ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner, have lauded Higgins for her advocacy work. But what precisely has Higgins become an advocate for? To many women, Higgins has become known, most famously, as the woman who chose to go to the media first, to politicians second, and to the police, to lodge a formal complaint, third." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19058165 Video: Bruce Lehrmann breaks his silence on Brittany Higgins case. Full 7NEWS Spotlight Interview - The man accused of raping Brittany Higgins in Parliament House has admitted he told three different stories to three different people when asked why he was in the office at the time the alleged rape took place. In a 7NEWS Spotlight exclusive, Bruce Lehrmann has offered his version of events.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188802

#30 - Part 34

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 10

>>19120643 ‘Time to stop’: Brittany Higgins lashes out against Linda Reynolds - Brittany Higgins has lashed out at her former boss, Linda Reynolds, after the Liberal MP said she would ask the National Anti-Corruption Commission to investigate the circumstances surrounding the commonwealth payment to her former staffer. On Tuesday Ms Higgins posted on social media a series of newspaper headlines that she claimed originate “from a current Australian Senator who continues to harass me through the media and in the Parliament …. This has been going on for years now. It is time to stop.” Senator Reynolds has indicated she will refer Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to the NACC over the payment of more than $2.5 million in compensation to her former staffer following Ms Higgins’ claims her allegations of rape were mishandled.

>>19126430 Shane Drumgold extends leave from ACT top prosecutor role following Bruce Lehrmann inquiry - The ACT’s top prosecutor has extended his leave for a second time in the wake of a bruising appearance at an inquiry into a high-profile trial. Shane Drumgold SC has been on leave since May after he faced days of questioning over his claims that he felt pressured not to charge former Coalition staffer Bruce Lehrmann over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins. Mr Drumgold was due to return to work in mid-June, but his leave was extended to the end of June. In a short statement ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury confirmed Mr Drumgold had extended his leave again until August 30.

>>19132091 ‘I have had enough’: Reynolds sends defamation notice to Higgins over Instagram post - Liberal senator Linda Reynolds has accused Brittany Higgins of repeatedly defaming her after sending a legal letter to her former staffer over a social media post this week in which Higgins accused Reynolds of using the media to harass her. On the same day Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, faced defamation action filed by Reynolds in a West Australian court, Higgins tweeted on Thursday that she had received a concerns notice from her former boss - for whom she worked as a ministerial adviser in 2019 – “threatening defamation over an Instagram story”. Reynolds later said in a statement that her lawyers sent a concerns notice to Higgins the day before in a “private communication, which she has chosen to make public”.

>>19132103 Brittany Higgins considers 'legal options' after being issued concerns notice from WA senator Linda Reynolds - Former Canberra political staffer Brittany Higgins says WA senator Linda Reynolds is threatening to sue her over an Instagram post. In a tweet today Ms Higgins said she had receive a "concerns notice" from Ms Reynolds. "I've just received a concerns notice from @lindareynoldswa threatening defamation over an Instagram story," the tweet reads. "I'm considering my legal options." Prominent defamation lawyer Martin Bennett, who acts for Ms Reynolds, confirmed to the ABC the notice had been sent yesterday to Ms Higgins's legal counsel and was related to an Instagram post.

>>19138736 Peter FitzSimons subpoenaed to produce documents relating to Brittany Higgins book deal - Nine columnist Peter FitzSimons has been subpoenaed to produce documents relating to a book deal he helped secure for former ministerial staffer Brittany Higgins believed to be worth $325,000. Attempts will also be made to subpoena ABC journalist Laura Tingle and publisher Random House for the production of documents in the defamation action brought by former parliament staffer Bruce Lehrmann against Network 10 and the ABC. Mr Lehrmann, who has consistently denied the allegations, is suing Network 10 and Wilkinson over an interview with Ms Higgins that aired on The Project in February 2021 detailing allegations of rape but not naming Mr Lehrmann as the alleged attacker. Mr Lehrmann is also suing the ABC over the broadcast of a ­National Press Club address given by Ms Higgins, and Justice Lee on Friday stood over a subpoena for Tingle, who hosted the club address on February 9 last year, to produce documents. The press club promoted sales of tickets to the address that ­referred to Ms Higgins’ decision to “publicly allege she was raped by a colleague inside Parliament House”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188806

#30 - Part 35

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>18960157 Anthony Albanese is expected to face pressure over the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal at national conference in August - Anthony Albanese’s support for AUKUS is expected to come under fire at Labor’s national conference in August, highlighting division within the ALP over the government’s national security agenda. Right faction delegates are preparing to counter an expected resolution from left-wing unions condemning the government’s support of the agreement. At the Queensland state conference on the weekend, the Electrical Trades Union moved a motion asking the branch to “categorically oppose the construction of nuclear-powered submarines” for the safety of constituents and the broader environment.

>>18982804 Transfer of Virginia-class submarines advances in US - US Congress has officially moved to introduce legislation that would pave the way for America’s most secret military intelligence - nuclear propelled submarines - to be transferred to Australia. Democrat congressman Joe Courtney along with Gregory Meeks and Ami Bera introduced the AUKUS Undersea Defense Act which provides legislative authority to allow for the transfer of Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia. The bill would also lead to the training of Australian private sector defence personnel, as well as the integration of Australian financial contributions to the US defence industrial base.

>>18982955 The case for AUKUS: let’s get things clear - "While opponents like Paul Keating snipe at our strategic policies - and our new lethal weapons - they consistently spare scrutiny of China, despite its likeness to Nazi Germany in several ways. We allowed ourselves, for 20 years after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, to believe the CCP would see the error of its ways and liberalise. We clung - as we profited handsomely from China’s rapid economic growth - to the hope that a rising tide would lift all boats. We miscalculated. The party is not for turning. It is aggressively anti-liberal. It seeks, like Putin, to overturn the liberal international order. That’s why AUKUS now exists." - Paul Monk, fellow of the Institute for Law and Strategy (London and New York) and head of the China desk in Australia’s Defence Intelligence Organisation in the mid-1990s

>>18987638 IAEA must not bend rules for AUKUS: China Daily editorial - "Li Song, China's permanent representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency, once again stressed that the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal is a cover for nuclear proliferation at the board meeting of the IAEA in Vienna on Thursday. No matter how far the de facto anti-China bloc has gone to justify the deal, they cannot deny its fundamental nature, which is the transfer of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium from two nuclear-weapon states to a non-nuclear-weapon state. That violates the principles and practices of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and severely undermines the international non-proliferation regime and the IAEA's safeguards system." - chinadaily.com.cn

>>19011154 Albanese faces AUKUS backlash from Victorian Labor Party faithful - Powerful unions want Labor’s rank and file to formally condemn the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal this weekend, potentially setting up an awkward clash with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese when he addresses Victorian Labor’s first state conference in four years. Both the prime minister and Premier Daniel Andrews will deliver speeches to party faithful at the conference, according to several state and federal government sources. The 606 delegates will be asked to vote on a motion from manufacturing union the AMWU seen by The Age, slamming Australia’s decision to acquire a nuclear-powered fleet from the United States and the prospect of the Albanese government “dragging Australia into a new Cold War, rather than pursuing the labour movement’s longstanding commitment to a peaceful and independent foreign and defence policy”.

>>19051132 The surprising reason ScoMo had to hoodwink Macron over AUKUS - Former prime minister Scott Morrison said his controversial decision to hide the truth about the AUKUS deal and the axing of France’s $90 billion submarine contract from President Emmanuel Macron was fuelled by a lack of trust not in the Frenchman but in US President Joe Biden. Mr Morrison said his fear was that if Mr Macron had prematurely found out what Australia was up to, the French leader could have persuaded Mr Biden to back away from the deal - leaving Canberra empty-handed. “He [Biden] could have said, ‘Oh, you know what, Emmanuel has been in contact. Look, I think we should put this off for a week or two while we work through these issues’,” Mr Morrison told UK-based Australian author Richard Kerbaj, in an updated edition of 'The Secret History of the Five Eyes' that will be released in Australia on July 11.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188807

#30 - Part 36

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>19082419 US ‘aspirational’ on timing of AUKUS submarines - The US navy is “aspirational” about meeting the submarine production targets required to ensure Australia will be able to purchase up to five nuclear-powered Virginia class submarines as promised under the AUKUS security pact. Admiral Michael Gilday told a seminar in Washington on Monday (Tuesday (AEST)) that it was “too early” to say “precisely where those submarines will come from, whether [from] excess capacity or whether that comes out of US inventory”. Bottlenecks in US submarine yards have limited the production of US Virginia class submarines to around 1.2 a year in recent years compared with the minimum of two per year required to fulfil the US navy’s own force projection requirements.

>>19082436 AUKUS could expand in second phase to include other countries, US officials say, while challenges remain for nuclear subs delivery - Senior US officials say they are in talks with a "variety" of other countries about potentially involving them in the second phase of the AUKUS agreement. Australia will obtain nuclear-powered submarines under what's known as Pillar One of the deal with the United States and the United Kingdom. Pillar Two will see the three nations working more closely together on other types of defence capabilities, such as artificial intelligence and quantum technologies.

>>19143911 Video: The three Australians on track to become the Top Guns of the sea - In the deep, dark waters of the Pacific Ocean, James Heydon, Adam Klyne, and William Hall could soon be breaking new ground for Australia: spending time at sea as AUKUS-ready nuclear submarine operators. The trio today became the first group of Royal Australian Navy personnel to graduate from Nuclear Power School: one of the US Defence Department’s most rigorous and demanding academic programs. “It’s a historic event for our navy, a historic event for our submarine force and a historic event for our nation,” said Australian Navy chief Mark Hammond, who attended their graduation ceremony at Goose Creek in South Carolina on Friday morning (US time).

>>19143964 Inside 'nuke school', the elite US training ground preparing Australian submariners for an AUKUS future - In America's deep south, a group of students has just completed one of the most rigorous academic programs in the US military. And for the first time, there were Australians among them. Three members of the Royal Australian Navy have graduated from the Nuclear Power School in South Carolina, more commonly known as 'nuke school'. The training pipeline was established with the US as part of the AUKUS agreement, under which Australia will obtain its own nuclear-powered submarines. The three Australians - Lieutenant Commander James Heydon, Lieutenant Commander Adam Klyne, and Lieutenant William Hall - started at the Nuclear Power School in November with the aim of eventually qualifying to operate the reactors onboard nuclear-powered submarines. Lieutenant Commander Heydon described the course he's just graduated from as a "four-year engineering degree crammed into six months". The Australians will now have to complete another set of practical learning, which will include spending time on retired nuclear-powered subs known as moored training ships. After that, they'll receive further training in Connecticut before being assigned to a Virginia-class sub.

>>19160130 China, Solomon Islands take swipe at AUKUS in announcing new strategic partnership - China and the Solomon Islands have signed a deal on police cooperation as part of an upgrade of their relations to a “comprehensive strategic partnership”, four years after the Pacific nation switched ties from Taiwan to China. The police cooperation pact was among nine deals signed after Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing, underlining his nation’s foreign policy shift. China will continue to provide assistance to the Solomon Islands to enhance its law enforcement capacity, according to a joint statement released by China’s official Xinhua news agency. It urged “relevant countries” to “prudently” handle issues such as the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea and cooperation on nuclear submarines, in a thinly veiled swipe at Japan and AUKUS, the alliance among Australia, the United States and Britain.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188808

#30 - Part 37

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 1

>>18934029 Ben Roberts-Smith: Top Australian soldier loses war crimes defamation case - Australia's most-decorated living soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has lost a historic defamation case against three newspapers that accused him of war crimes in Afghanistan. The outlets were sued over articles alleging he killed unarmed prisoners. The civil trial was the first time a court has assessed accusations of war crimes by Australian forces. Justice Anthony Besanko said four of the six murder allegations, all denied by the soldier, were substantially true. These included - A handcuffed farmer the soldier had kicked off a cliff, a fall which knocked out the man's teeth, before he was subsequently shot dead - A captured Taliban fighter who was shot at least 10 times in the back, before his prosthetic leg was taken as a trophy and later used by troops as a drinking vessel - Two murders which were ordered or agreed to by Mr Roberts-Smith to initiate or "blood" rookie soldiers.

>>18934054 Ben Roberts-Smith loses mammoth defamation battle against newspapers, reporters - A defamation case by war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith against three newspapers has been dismissed, after a judge found defences of substantial or contextual truth had been established over alleged unlawful killings, bullying and domestic violence. The Victoria Cross recipient sued The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Canberra Times and three journalists in the Federal Court over a series of stories published in 2018. Mr Roberts-Smith said they contained false allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, bullying of his former Special Air Service Regiment (SAS) colleagues and domestic violence against a woman in a Canberra hotel room.

>>18934081 Ben Roberts-Smith: SAS veteran a murderer with a cross to bear - Australia’s most decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, callously murdered four unarmed ­civilians while serving with the Special Air Service in Afghanistan, a judge has found, and now faces the prospect of serious criminal charges and being stripped of his Victoria Cross. Handing down his decision in the high-stakes defamation action brought by the former soldier against Nine newspapers, Federal Court judge Anthony Besanko ruled on Thursday that Mr ­Roberts-Smith had murdered four prisoners, including a ­farmer who was kicked off a cliff in the village of Darwan, and a one-legged man dragged from a tunnel at the compound known as ­Whiskey 108.

>>18939562 Rogues in the ranks await their fate as a giant is toppled - The trials of Ben Roberts-Smith and a raft of other SAS soldiers who served with him in Afghanistan are only just beginning. We are now likely to see a slew of criminal prosecutions for war crimes in Afghanistan that will cast a dark shadow over Australia’s military for many years. Even though this was a civil case and therefore had a lower burden of proof than a criminal prosecution, the result offers further confirmation that Australian soldiers participated in horrific war crimes in Afghanistan. It adds to the findings of the 2020 Brereton report which found “credible” evidence of allegations 25 Australian soldiers murdered 39 Afghan civilians. So far only one former SAS soldier, Oliver Schultz, has been charged with murder. But more criminal charges are now expected, with the Office of the Special Investigator examining “between 40 and 50” further allegations of war crimes.

>>18939570 Courtroom void tells us something about the man - "Ben Roberts-Smith won his cherished Victoria Cross charging towards danger. He lost the honour it bestowed while draped across a sun lounge by a pool in Bali. It’s hard to imagine a greater fall from grace - harder still to know why he chose not to front up on the day of judgement. Roberts-Smith had turned up to court every day of the trial, sharply dressed, shoes polished, ready to stare down his accusers. Not on Thursday, when Judge Anthony Besanko sat down to deliver his verdict. The void in Courtroom 1 where Roberts-Smith should have stood on Thursday tells us something about the man. It speaks of contempt for a judicial system that, once he got a whiff it wasn’t working for him the way he’d planned, could be left at the door like last night’s room service. The war hero brought this case on but wouldn’t see it through to the end." - Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188809

#30 - Part 38

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 2

>>18939574 A profound blow to our many honourable soldiers, but Army must be bound by rule of war - "The devastating loss by Ben Roberts-Smith in his defamation case will deliver a profound blow to the morale of the army and the Australian Defence Force generally. It was always a difficult case to understand. At some level, Roberts-Smith must believe himself innocent, or either remember or construe his actions differently from the way the court has. On the other hand, the evidence against him was strong. Still, we should remember this was not a criminal case and Roberts-Smith has not been charged with any crime and he has not been found guilty of anything to a criminal standard of proof. Nonetheless, taken in combination with the Brereton report, there is overwhelming evidence that there was grave misconduct by some Australian soldiers in Afghanistan." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18955265 ‘Not an honest and reliable witness’: Judge’s scathing assessment of Roberts-Smith - Disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith gave false evidence, threatened a former comrade who later testified against him and arranged “unusual” legal fee payments for supportive witnesses, the judge who dismissed his multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit said. In the full reasons for the judgment, released on Monday, Federal Court judge Anthony Besanko said the former Special Air Service corporal was “not an honest and reliable witness in … many areas”. He endorsed the credibility and honesty of witnesses who detailed Roberts-Smith’s wrongdoing.

>>18955292 Ben Roberts-Smith may have committed criminal offence, judge in defamation trial finds - War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith may have committed a criminal offence by sending threatening letters to a former SAS colleague, a Federal Court judge has found. Mr Roberts-Smith sued The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Canberra Times and three journalists, denying allegations contained in a series of 2018 reports of war crimes, bullying and domestic violence. The judge was satisfied, to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, that allegations Mr Roberts-Smith was involved or complicit in four unlawful killings in Afghanistan were substantially true. Mr Roberts-Smith had also denied sending anonymous, threatening letters to a former SAS colleague in 2018 by asking a private detective, John McLeod, to post material on his behalf. In the full judgement, published today, Justice Anthony Besanko said the sending of the letters may constitute a criminal offence; either perverting the course of justice or using a postal service to menace, harass or cause offence. "I am satisfied on the evidence that the applicant, through Mr McLeod, arranged for two threatening letters to be sent to Person 18."

>>18960215 Going woke risks destroying the ADF as a real fighting force - "The government is now pushing a great deal of politically correct nonsense on the army. It has restored the rainbow morning teas. It rejoices in its membership of LGBTQ lobby groups. Diversity, equity and inclusion are all the rage. Recruitment advertisements make no mention of combat or what a life of service in the army is really all about. I am strongly in favour of diversity in the army and the ADF. But diversity should work this way: you encourage people from widely diverse backgrounds to apply, but then the selection and promotion procedures should be absolutely colourblind and gender-blind. We forget what the army is for. The key role of the army is to close with and destroy the enemy. You hope you never need to do that, but that’s what you have a military for. The Australian Army, like many Western armies, is now subject to a bewildering range of woke requirements that have nothing to do with being an effective army, nor indeed with being an ethical and moral military either. Given the emphasis on teamwork and group cohesion, this kind of poison can spread through a military at devastating speed." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188811

#30 - Part 39

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 3

>>18977671 Video: Ben Roberts-Smith alleged to have directed the killing of elderly imam in Afghanistan - Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith directed one of his SAS comrades to kill an elderly man who was dragged from a mosque in Afghanistan, according to allegations uncovered by ABC Investigations. ABC Investigations can reveal the disgraced war hero's alleged involvement in the killing, which sparked a diplomatic row for Australia. The Australian government was quick to defend the August 2012 killing of Haji Raz Mohammad, an imam in the village of Sola, in Uruzgan province, claiming he was an insurgent. ABC Investigations understands the alleged incident is now in the hands of Australia's war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI).

>>19005517 ‘Massive blow’: AFP war crimes probe collapses over risk of tainted evidence - A five-year Australian Federal Police inquiry into Ben Roberts-Smith’s alleged involvement in the execution of three Afghan captives has collapsed after Commonwealth prosecutors ruled investigators may have unwittingly used tainted evidence. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions’ (CDPP) decision not to prosecute Roberts-Smith based on evidence gathered during the AFP probe has led to a new joint taskforce being set up to investigate the alleged executions. The taskforce comprises detectives from the specialist war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI), and a new team of federal police investigators not connected to the abandoned AFP probe. The CDPP concluded in March that the five-year AFP probe should not lead to a prosecution because of the risk it was unwittingly compromised by the receipt of certain information from the Brereton inquiry, a military inspector general probe which ran from 2016-2020 and used special coercive powers to question SAS soldiers.

>>19016850 War crimes ‘will be prosecuted’ says Andrew Hastie - Opposition defence spokesman and former SAS captain Andrew Hastie says he is confident special forces war criminals will be brought to justice despite the collapse of a five-year investigation into allegations of murder against Australia’s most decorated soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith. The Australian Federal Police defended its conduct on Wednesday after it was forced to junk its investigation into Mr Roberts-Smith’s alleged involvement in the execution of three Afghan prisoners, amid concerns over tainted evidence. The AFP and detectives from the nation’s war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator, have now started a fresh probe into the alleged murders, which sources warn could take years. Mr Hastie said he was not privy to the reasons behind the decision, but declared: “The Office of the Special Investigator is active”.

>>19016902 Video: No apologies as Roberts-Smith returns to Australia following defamation judgment - Former SAS corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has ruled out apologising to the families of the victims affected by his actions in Afghanistan. Roberts-Smith - arriving into Perth on a Qantas flight shortly after 9pm on Wednesday – said he was devastated by the outcome of his high-profile defamation case against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times, adding that he was “100 per cent” proud of his behaviour while serving in the Defence Force. It is the first time Roberts-Smith has spoken publicly since the case ended, spending the days prior to the court judgment in Bali.

>>19037107 Be brave, strip soldiers’ medals, says expert who sparked war crimes inquiry - The sociologist who triggered the Brereton war crimes inquiry has urged Defence Minister Richard Marles to stare down veterans’ groups by stripping medals from soldiers who oversaw alleged wrongdoing in Afghanistan, saying it will reflect poorly on the nation if no action is taken. Samantha Crompvoets, an expert on organisational culture, was commissioned by the Department of Defence in 2015 to produce a report that led to military personnel disclosing claims of unlawful behaviour including alleged war crimes. In her first interview since a Federal Court judge found Ben Roberts-Smith to be a murderer and war criminal when dismissing his defamation case last week, Crompvoets said the decorated former soldier should lose his Victoria Cross for bringing the Australian Defence Force into disrepute. Crompvoets said Australians should prepare to hear confronting allegations at possible future criminal trials flowing from the Brereton inquiry.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188812

#30 - Part 40

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 4

>>19037124 Video: Jacqui Lambie wants International Criminal Court to investigate military commanders for alleged war crimes - Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie has requested the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague investigate senior Australian Defence Force (ADF) commanders over their knowledge of alleged war crimes in Afghanistan. Senator Lambie has been scathing in her assessment of Major General Paul Brereton's landmark inquiry into allegations of serious misconduct by Australian special forces - a redacted version of which was made public in late 2020. She has argued the ADF's high command has avoided scrutiny and accountability over what they knew of unlawful killings and cruel treatment of prisoners, despite recollections from former SAS personnel and testimony in court suggesting rumours were well known by the top brass.

>>19075534 War crimes investigators want access to Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case secret file Federal investigators are poised to access secret files from Ben Roberts-Smith’s failed defamation case in a development that indicates prosecutors intend to use previously undisclosed evidence from the trial about the killing of unarmed prisoners in a future war crimes trial. A letter sent by the Australian Government Solicitor on Friday to both sides in the defamation case, seen by The Australian, says the Office of the Special Investigator – the agency set up to investigate war crimes by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan - requires access to the case’s Sensitive Court File. The highly protected Sensitive Court File contains hundreds of classified documents and photographs, the identities of all the Special Air Service witnesses in the case and transcripts of evidence given in closed sessions of the trial, including by Mr Roberts-Smith himself.

>>19104491 OPINION: I exposed war crimes among the SAS. A few weeks ago, my car was repossessed - "When my car was repossessed by debt collectors a few weeks ago, amid wrapping up loose ends after my company went into liquidation, it made me reflect on the life I once led and the one I lead now. For me, it all began on Australia Day 2016. That was the day I submitted a report to army chief General Angus Campbell that would trigger the biggest inquiry into war crimes in Australia’s history. When the war crimes allegations emerged, then-defence minister Peter Dutton said he had made it “very clear” to Defence that I should not be awarded further contracts. That he did not want the military to be “distracted by things that have happened in the past”. My credibility was questioned repeatedly by Jacqui Lambie and reiterated in the Murdoch press. In a letter I received from the government solicitor’s office shortly after publication, I was told my conduct and public statements had “harmed the Commonwealth”. The result was that my ongoing work with the government was “terminated for convenience”. The implications for me, my family, my business, and my staff were profound. The message had been sent to the department loud and clear that I was now a liability and a risk. No work would follow. Work in the pipeline was stopped indefinitely. I’d told the truth, so they cut me out. After that my business collapsed and my mental health declined amid the endless stream of misogynistic threats through social media. Work from other organisations was not forthcoming. I gather this was because most businesses hire consultants to tell them what they want to hear, not uncover what is really at the heart of their problems." - Samantha Crompvoets, sociologist and expert in organisational culture - theage.com.au

>>19160231 Ben Roberts-Smith appeals major defamation loss - Disgraced soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has launched an appeal of the judgment in his failed defamation action against The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times, which ruled he is a war criminal, murderer and a bully. On Tuesday Mr Roberts-Smith filed a notice of appeal in the Federal Court. According to the notice, Mr Roberts-Smith is appealing on the grounds that Justice Besanko erred in finding the former soldier ordered executions and murdered Afghans. This includes the finding that he kicked an unarmed Afghan civilian off a cliff in 2012 and ordered his execution, as well as killing an elderly Afghan in 2009 with a machine gun. Nine managing director of publishing James Chessell said: “We believe the Federal Court’s judgment is comprehensive and categorical. The appeal will be opposed. We will always stand up for journalism that is in the public interest.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0cfbd1 No.19188814

File: f6dfcfcd28a98ac⋯.gif (2.99 MB,252x263,252:263,f6dfcfcd28a98ac6b9065bd1bb….gif)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188815

#30 - Part 41

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 1

>>18928670 Indigenous Voice to Parliament: There has never been a political alignment like this - "In post-war Australia there has rarely, if ever, been a political alignment like this. Our elites have come together - political, corporate, financial, university, media, sporting, trade union and religious – to persuade and intimidate the Australian people to put an Indigenous voice to parliament into the Constitution. The nation confronts an unparalleled contest between an alliance of elites and a public that is wary and suspicious, increasingly resentful of the pressure to do the “polite” thing. Many Australians see the Yes campaign as well-intentioned deception. They feel they are not being levelled with but patronised, their goodwill exploited. The more the Yes campaign is scrutinised, the more the scale of serial deception is apparent." - Paul Kelly, Editor-at-Large, The Australian - theaustralian.com.au

>>18928883 An Indigenous voice to parliament is our chance to grasp history and create change, says Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - "Amid the fog of fiction and misunderstanding these past few months, it’s important to spell it out again. This isn’t about politics. This isn’t about politicians. This is about people. People striving to make themselves heard across our great nation. In the regions and beyond in the remotest corners of our vast continent. We are fortunate to be here in this moment in history, where we have within our hands the chance to make a positive change that will last for generations. A change that will outlast us." - Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18934123 State of Origin fans asked to ‘make right call’ on voice referendum - The Welcome to Country opening State of Origin I has alluded to the looming referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament, calling on Australians to “make the right call”. Uncle Karl Winda Telfer addressed Adelaide Oval on Wednesday night ahead of the match between the Queensland Maroons and the NSW Blues. Mr Telfer said the match was taking place on sacred land and Australians would need to have “serious conversations” before the end of the year. “Today we’re not about pushing people apart, we’re about the union,” he said. “Of us all in this great game in this great country, we need to have the conversations leading up to the end of this year. I think we’re mature enough to make the right call yeah.”

>>18934161 Senator Jacinta Price slams State of Origin for using Welcome to Country ceremony to reference Voice to Parliament - Shadow minister for Indigenous Australians Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has lashed out at the State of Origin Welcome to Country ceremony after it made reference to the proposed Voice to Parliament. Uncle Karl Winda Telfer addressed Adelaide Oval on Wednesday night ahead of the series opener between the Queensland Maroons and New South Wales Blues where he called on the spectators to have “serious conversations” ahead of the referendum. The mention of the Voice to Parliament divided footy fans and Senator Price was among the vocal critics. “I’m sick and tired of it, I’m sick and tired of these acknowledgements because of nothing more than my racial heritage,” she said

>>18939765 Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum bill passes lower house - The legislation to set up the referendum on enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in the constitution has passed the House of Representatives. The bill still needs to be dealt with by the Senate, which is likely next month, before the federal government sets a date for the poll later this year. The final vote in the lower house was 121 in favour of the bill, and 25 against - with the Nationals and a handful of Liberal MPs voting to block the referendum going ahead. Applause rung out across the House of Representatives after the result was announced.

>>18939781 Linda Burney says Indigenous voice to parliament has been ‘no flight of fancy’ as bill passes lower house - The Albanese government has been “extraordinarily careful and consultative” in forming the Indigenous voice to parliament, Linda Burney has declared, urging Australians to look at publicly available information to understand the advisory body. The country is on track to head to a referendum between October and December this year, with the government’s legislation outlining the question and constitutional amendment that Australians will be voting on passing the House of Representatives on Wednesday. The Constitution Alteration Bill is due to clear the final parliamentary hurdle – receiving an ­absolute majority of support from senators – in June, before the five-week winter break.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188816

#30 - Part 42

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 2

>>18939811 Indigenous voice to parliament proposal is ‘modest’ no more, says Anthony Albanese - "Anthony Albanese’s lack of a detailed argument supporting the Yes case for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government and his propensity to emotionally adjust to the audience he is addressing is leading him into inconsistency. For months the Prime Minister has argued that the voice referendum proposal is “modest and gracious”. But, under emotional influence - genuine and sincere - Albanese has declared to a highly sympathetic audience that the proposal is “modest” no more. “So let us not content ourselves with modest change,” he said in the culmination and conclusion of the Lowitja O’Donaghue oration in Adelaide. “Let us not fill our hearts with the empty warmth of the merely symbolic,” he said." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939831 A ‘modest’ Indigenous voice to parliament? Take a look out west to consider it’s far reaching consequences - "Anthony Albanese’s pitch to Australians for months has been that they should vote for his voice because it will be an important “but modest change”. Only the cat is now out of the bag with his comments in a speech to Indigenous leaders this week declaring “let this be no modest change”. In the clearest sign yet of what will come, all Australians need to look at the enormous Aboriginal heritage changes about to roll out across Western Australia from July 1. What’s more, these changes will create a whole new land-use approvals regime that circumvents elected officials and subjects the rights of private property owners to Aboriginal heritage assessment." - Peta Credlin - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939852 Don’t let No scare tactics get in the way of the Indigenous voice to parliament - "Some have claimed the voice’s representations would derail government decisions on everything from nuclear-powered submarines to lighthouses. Michaelia Cash even said the voice would interfere with parking tickets. Others have claimed the voice will stymie Australia’s national security and could even prevent Australia going to war. These suggestions demonstrate the tenor of the No case. The Yes case cannot resort to lies. The case for change must deal in truth. Advocates for this change must fight fear with facts, as Leeser has done in his latest speech. And we must answer hate with love. If we do that, the Yes vote will succeed." - Shireen Morris, constitutional lawyer and director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University law school - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939907 Video: Voice to Parliament draws mixed opinions in Indigenous community of Woorabinda - Like many in his community, Douglas Graham wants to see the town of Woorabinda - and the lives of the people in it - improve, but he is unsure if or how the Indigenous Voice to Parliament would help. Mr Graham, the librarian at Woorabinda's Indigenous Knowledge Centre in central Queensland, has been following the public debate on the proposed Voice to Parliament. But the Gooreng Gooreng/Lamalama man says what it will mean for his people on the ground is still unclear. "We've had a voice … and they still haven't listened to us [since colonisation]," he said.

>>18939935 Queensland LNP leader David Crisafulli to vote No on Indigenous voice to parliament - Queensland’s Liberal National Party leader David Crisafulli has revealed he will vote No in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum later this year. Mr Crisafulli, who had for months refused to reveal his position, on Wednesday said he planned to vote No but would not actively campaign against the voice. Mr Crisafulli said he was concerned about “risks” of enshrining the voice in the constitution, including the potential it could undermine parliament’s power. “I don’t feel a voice that is legislated wouldn’t be able to achieve exactly the same thing as one that’s enshrined in the constitution, (but) without that level of risk,” he said.

>>18945729 Father Brennan tells Albanese and Dutton to find common ground on Voice - One of the Catholic Church’s leading proponents of the Indigenous Voice to parliament fears the referendum will leave Australians divided - no matter the result - and he lays the blame on both sides of politics for not striving harder to find common ground. Father Frank Brennan, a Jesuit priest and human rights lawyer, will use a lecture in Rome to urge Australians to recommit themselves to a “deep inner listening” towards each other and the land. He will remind Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton that they bear responsibility for the tone of the debate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188818

#30 - Part 43

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 3

>>18945799 It’s not the No camp that’s highlighting race in Indigenous voice to parliament debate - "Everywhere I go in Australia today, discourse on matters of national interest lends itself to a racially intense focus. The debate surrounding the voice to parliament cannot exist without such discourse, whether Race Discrimination Commissioner Chin Tan likes it or not. This week Tan appealed to political leaders and the media to steer clear of making race the focus of the voice to parliament debate, warning it would embolden racists and expose Indigenous Australians to abuse and vilification. But asking Australians to avoid highlighting race in the voice debate is like asking someone to avoid getting wet walking through monsoonal rains. This is not the fault of everyday Australians but of the unyielding activist class that for the past decade has doused petrol on the flames of identity politics." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, CLP senator for the Northern Territory - theaustralian.com.au

>>18949802 ‘Duplicitous’: Noel Pearson accuses Peter Dutton over race argument on voice - Prominent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has accused Peter Dutton of being “duplicitous” in raising concern that enshrining the Indigenous voice to parliament in the Constitution would “re-racialise the nation”, claiming the Opposition Leader assured him earlier this year he would be not making arguments on the basis of race.

>>18949819 Moral high ground in Indigenous voice to parliament debate has been hijacked by perceived ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ vote - "To label the Yes or No case as right or wrong is to convert people’s votes into moral judgments carrying a weight of guilt that should not attach to the free exercise of our democratic right on such a complex issue with ramifications across the federal government. There is also a conundrum in the heart of the debate about whether the voice will be modest or radical; practical or symbolic; and all-encompassing or restricted to issues affecting Indigenous people only. The difficulty for Albanese and voice supporters is that they are maintaining all points simultaneously despite the inherent contradictions." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18949840 It’s OK to vote Yes: Meet the Liberals campaigning for the Voice - Kate Carnell wants Liberals, Liberal voters and Liberal-curious people to know one thing: it’s OK to vote Yes. The former Liberal ACT chief minister and Small Business Ombudsman is the head of the Liberals For Yes campaign, which launches today with its own merchandise and website. “We are aiming our campaign at, not just at Liberal party members, but people who traditionally vote Liberal,” Carnell said. “We want to empower them. Just because federally the party is taking a different tack, doesn’t mean you can’t vote Yes.”

>>18955149 Newspoll reveals 46% of Australians intend to vote ‘yes’ to an Indigenous voice to parliament in referendum, 43% no - Less than half of eligible Australians now say they will vote in favour of a referendum to enshrine a voice to parliament and executive government in a troubling sign for the yes campaign and Anthony Albanese’s ambitions to ­secure constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander people. An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows only 46 per cent of voters approve of ­altering the Constitution to give effect to an Indigenous voice as proposed by the federal government. With opinion almost equally divided, 43 per cent of voters said they would vote no, while 11 per cent said they didn’t know. It is the first Newspoll survey to present voters with the precise question they will be asked at the ballot box when the referendum is held this year. Past Newspoll surveys showing support for a voice to parliament above 50 per cent were based on a more general question. The new survey suggests that the contest is now closer than previous polls have suggested, with the referendum poised to go either way with clear generational divisions now emerging amid a schism between regional Australia and the capital cities.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188819

#30 - Part 44

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 4

>>18955174 Voice campaigners confident despite new polling - Campaigners for an Indigenous voice remain confident of success at the upcoming referendum despite declining support in new opinion polling. The latest Newspoll shows 46 per cent backing for the proposal, dropping from 54 per cent earlier this year. Some 43 per cent of those surveyed were opposed and 11 per cent did not know. The referendum, due to be held between October and December, needs a national majority as well as a majority of voters in at least four states for the constitution to be changed. But Yes 23 campaign director Dean Parkin said he expected support to grow for the voice as it moves away from political debate in parliament and into communities. "It's understandable in some ways that there has been some tightening up in the numbers. We knew this would always become contested," he told Sky News.

>>18955207 Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaigners must persuade dubious Australians ahead of referendum - "There is one unlikely point of agreement between the Yes and No camps for the voice referendum. Terror of the consequences of a lost vote. Each understands Indigenous Australians will be shattered. Each will blame the other. The scorched earth will belong to both. For Yes supporters - including me - winning is the only course. Politics, personalities and even past drafting disputes are irrelevant. But the immediate challenge is that the polling for the voice is not good. It is threatening. Multiple polls place the Yes vote between the high 40s and low 50s. Support for No is in the mid 30s. Undecideds are around 20 per cent. There is not a Yes majority in a single state." - Emeritus Professor Greg Craven, constitutional lawyer - theaustralian.com.au

>>18955225 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament ‘Yes’ campaign strategy is faltering - "Only several months out from the referendum and the Indigenous voice to parliament is in trouble. The strength of the No vote is now significant and the Newspoll results may well come as a shock to the other side. The findings don’t bode well for Anthony Albanese, whose political strategy to hold back detail of the voice to parliament and go on the vibe of constitutional recognition is clearly failing. The Prime Minister’s conviction that the moral imperative will win over Australians is being put to the test." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>18960113 Anthony Albanese’s decision to make no effort to attract Coalition support for Indigenous voice to parliament is backfiring - "The latest Newspoll figures suggest two of Anthony Albanese’s key strategies in his bid to pass the referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament - to avoid giving detail and to eschew bipartisan support - are failing. The latest Newspoll figures, which it must be said respond to a different question to the previous referendum polling questions, suggest there is an across-the-board movement against the voice and a surge in uncertainty. The movement against the voice to parliament and the executive government is strongest among older Australians and Coalition supporters." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18960120 State premiers ‘important’ to Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaign, referendum - The Albanese government is banking on the country’s premiers playing a crucial role in getting the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum across the line, hoping the state leaders’ popularity in states like South Australia and NSW will help clinch a Yes vote. While Queensland is considered the weakest link for the Yes camp, Labor insiders were hopeful Chris Minns in NSW, Peter Malinauskas in SA and the country’s only Liberal premier, Jeremy Rockliff in Tasmania, would be influential campaigners.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188820

#30 - Part 45

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 5

>>18960127 Indigenous voice to parliament doesn’t guarantee it will help Indigenous Australians - "Perhaps the most important question in the lead-up to the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum is not whether modifications to the Constitution are legally sound, but will such modifications contribute to helping Indigenous Australians in any practical way? I am not convinced a constitutionally enshrined body can help those Indigenous people who need the most help, any more than the legions of Indigenous people currently working for government can. In fact, I think it can be harmful to them. It sends the poisonous message to Indigenous Australians who suffer needlessly that their salvation lies in the voice and they are powerless to make any positive change in their lives, now or ever, through their own efforts or from receiving the help offered to them." - Anthony Dillon is an honorary fellow in the faculty of health sciences at the Australian Catholic University and identifies as a part-Indigenous Australian - theaustralian.com.au

>>18965820 There’s nothing impartial or even-handed in Labor’s support for the Indigenous voice to parliament - "I’ve been opposed to this voice proposal from day one. It’s wrong on moral grounds (for going down the group rights road and breaking the commitment to equal citizenship). It’s wrong on political grounds because our already sclerotic lawmaking process will grind massively more slowly if this body has to be consulted on near-on everything. And it’s wrong on legal and constitutional grounds (not least because this will be the first proposed referendum mooting a new chapter in our Constitution, a fact that is begging the judges to be activist, because past forays into “making it up at the point of application” always involve judges pointing to the structure and different-chapters nature of our Constitution). That’s my substantive position." - James Allan, Garrick professor of law at the University of Queensland - theaustralian.com.au

>>18965852 Migrants got a fair go, it’s our turn to pay it forward with the Indigenous voice to parliament - "Indigenous communities occupy a special historical place in this country. Provided with accurate information, most multicultural Australians understand this. I urge migrants and their descendants: do not be passive bystanders in this debate. It is inspiring to see more than 120 multicultural community organisations stepping up, saying Yes and helping educate their communities - but we can and must do more. We must fight fake news with facts. We must counter misinformation and division with truth and compassion. Let us do the hard work together. If multicultural Australians stand in solidarity with Indigenous people, the referendum will succeed." - Shireen Morris, constitutional lawyer and director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University law school - theaustralian.com.au

>>18965884 Indigenous voice to parliament ‘does not deal with the reality of what it means to be Aboriginal and what people endure day-to-day’ - "There are many reasons to vote No to the legislation that establishes the voice to parliament: the lack of recognition of First Nations in the concept; the associated lack of a cultural rationale. How is it Indigenous? How can it succeed without being recognisably Indigenous? Associated with this lack of connection to the reality of life in Aboriginal communities is that just by its existence it will undermine the power First Nations have over their lands and waters, their existing relationships to governments, their autonomy; for these reasons it is bound to cause and exacerbate conflicts." - Victoria Grieves Williams PhD has worked for almost 40 years in Aboriginal affairs - theaustralian.com.au

>>18971069 ‘We are the voice from the bush’: Spirit of Yunupingu to spur Yes campaign - Australians will be asked to embrace the idea of an Indigenous Voice to parliament in a historic call from Northern Territory land councils to mark the 35th anniversary of the landmark Barunga Statement. Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney will travel to the Northern Territory later this week to attend the Barunga festival - more than three decades after then-prime minister Bob Hawke was handed the famous treaty request by esteemed rights activist, the late Yunupingu, at the same event.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188821

#30 - Part 46

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 6

>>18971082 The Indigenous voice to parliament could be a new remedy for Aboriginal disadvantage - "If you live in regional Australia the issues that are creating divisions in the community are not based on political structures in Perth or Canberra but the growing incidence of crime and anti-social behaviour. These things I believe are symptoms of wider issues, but unless we create a mechanism to listen to the voices who say we must do something, nothing can change. The two questions I believe Australians should consider at the referendum are “What should we do?” or the more empowering question, “Who do we want to be?” I hope our answer to the second question will lead us to the conclusion that if most of the things we have tried in the past have not worked, and if we would like Aboriginal people to enjoy a better life, we will support the Indigenous voice to parliament." - Ian Trust, chairman of Empowered Communities - theaustralian.com.au

>>18971099 The powerful enjoy special access; Aboriginal people should too, through an Indigenous voice to parliament - "Nobody of any standing is opposed to recognition in the Constitution of the Aboriginal people as the country’s first inhabitants. So that leaves the practical measure that is proposed – the voice itself. Surely to lift up our most marginalised citizens, so they can lobby just as the powerful can, is a reasonable course of action. For as long as can be envisaged, Aboriginal people will remain less powerful than existing interest groups, which have always had all the access they want. Why? Because, unlike most of the others, Indigenous Australians lack lots of money and entrenched influence. Those who represent the Aboriginal people will never be able to pull strings by way of political donations. But they do seek a seat at the table where decisions affecting them are made. We, the Australian people, ought to give them that seat, that access: the voice." - Ian Temby AO KC, the first commonwealth director of public prosecutions and the first commissioner of the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption - - theaustralian.com.au

>>18977458 NT land councils back the Voice to Parliament at Barunga Festival, 'to finally be respected as equals' - Members of Northern Territory Aboriginal Land Councils have gathered at Barunga, to declare their support of an Indigenous Voice in the upcoming referendum. More than 200 representatives of the Northern, Central, Tiwi and Anindilyakwa Aboriginal Land Councils gathered on the Traditional Lands of the Bagala (Jawoyn). Land council members signed the Declaration and a copy was then presented to Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney.

>>18977583 Victorian Bar lawyers back the voice following membership poll - The Victorian Bar Association has thrown its support behind the Indigenous voice, claiming it is “sound” and “appropriate”, after a membership poll revealed just over 50 per cent of barristers supported the Bar taking a public stance. The state Bar Council elected to poll the entire association last month following a fractious debate broke out among members over whether it should issue a statement supporting the Indigenous voice, or whether it should stay silent. Results from the poll showed that of the 2229 Bar members who were eligible to vote, 1767 did. Of those 1767 members, 1008 (57 per cent) voted in favour of the Bar supporting the Indigenous voice and 714 (40 per cent) voted for a separate motion that the Bar not publicly support either the “yes” case of the “no” case for the voice. Forty-five members abstained from voting.

>>18992119 Yes campaign at odds with own director Noel Pearson - The Indigenous voice to parliament’s best-resourced campaign, Yes23, has directly contradicted criticism from one of its own directors Noel Pearson that the campaign lacks a clear message. Mr Pearson, one of 11 directors of Yes23 and its charitable arm Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition, has pointed to failings in the campaign he helped devise. Amid concern over recent polls showing a reduction in support for the voice, he suggested the campaign must do better to convey the key message that recognition is the aim and a voice is the way to get there. “It’s a lack of clarity that is obviously working against us,” the veteran of the Indigenous rights movement told the Sydney Morning Herald. Danny Gilbert, the prominent lawyer who co-chairs Yes23 with screenwriter and filmmaker Rachel Perkins, was adamant the campaign was on track. “As the campaign moves into a new phase we are fully confident that we are on the right path to bringing Australians together to deliver a resounding ‘yes’.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188822

#30 - Part 47

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 7

>>18992132 Yes campaign ‘snookered’, says Noel Pearson in call for major campaign shift - Leading Voice architect Noel Pearson is pushing for a fundamental shift in how the Voice to parliament referendum is being presented, warning the Yes movement lacks a clear message and has been snookered by deceptive arguments of its opponents. In a significant intervention months out from a tightly contested referendum, the academic and activist also said there was an urgent need to elevate the goal of recognising Indigenous Australians in the Constitution above the creation of the Voice advisory body. “I think that message has got to be even more prominent than the Voice. The Voice is just the means; the core of the reform is recognition,” he said in an interview, “and our argument is that the Voice is the best means.”

>>18992142 Indigenous voice to parliament can complete the unfinished business of the 1967 referendum - "Australians have come to see the true significance of the 1967 referendum. The unprecedented Yes vote for the Indigenous proposal provided a mandate for national laws and policy on Aboriginal affairs. What was missing was positive acknowledgment in the Constitution and a means for first peoples to have a say on the laws and policies that could now be made for them. The task of the 2023 referendum is to remedy this unfinished business by providing recognition and a voice to Australia’s first peoples." - George Williams, deputy vice-chancellor and Professor of Law at the University of New South Wales

>>18992160 ‘A tipping point’: Support for Voice falls below a majority - Support for the Indigenous Voice has fallen below a majority on the Yes or No question that will decide the referendum, dropping from 53 to 49 per cent ahead of a crucial Senate decision on the wording of the change to the constitution. Voters have swung against the proposal for the third month in a row and are backing the No case in three states - Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia - when asked about the federal government’s proposed question. An exclusive survey shows that support for the Voice is at 56 per cent in Victoria and 53 per cent in NSW but this is outweighed by powerful swings that could block the reform gaining the required threshold of a majority of votes in a majority of states. The Resolve survey is the first major poll to show No has a majority and the first to show three states have shifted to the No side.

>>18992177 Is Anthony Albanese facing a tipping point on the Voice referendum? - "Anthony Albanese is about to reach the point of no return on the Indigenous Voice with an apparent confidence that Australians will back his preferred model for the contentious change. But the latest Resolve Political Monitor highlights the grave danger of defeat – and a generational setback for reconciliation – unless the prime minister and the Yes campaigners take drastic action to save their cause." - David Crowe - theage.com.au

>>18998240 Conservative think-tank chairman Sean Gordon to co-lead Liberals for Yes campaign - Referendum working group member and chairman of the conservative think-tank Uphold and Recognise, Sean Gordon, will lead the Liberals for Yes campaign alongside former ACT chief minister Kate Carnell, ahead of the referendum on the Indigenous voice to parliament. The Liberals for Yes, which include federal opposition backbenchers Julian Leeser and Bridget Archer, officially launched their campaign advocating for the voice earlier this month, arguing the meaningful recognition of Indigenous Australians through a voice to parliament would deliver “practical policy and practical outcomes”. The Australian can reveal Uphold and Recognise, which was founded by Mr Leeser and whose board members include former Indigenous Australians minister Ken Wyatt, will formally join the Liberals for Yes this week.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188825

#30 - Part 48

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 8

>>18998246 Voice opponents turn to ‘Trump-like’ politics, misinformation: Burney - Campaigners against the Indigenous Voice referendum are copying Donald Trump by weaponising misinformation, Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney has declared, as Voice backers implore Australians to keep faith in the reconciliation push. Burney used a speech in Canberra on Tuesday night to claim the Voice would lead to tangible improvements in society and a “more productive Australia, with greater social and economic participation”, while highlighting the No campaign’s “post-truth approach to politics”. “I fear that the No campaign is importing American-style Trump politics to Australia,” she said. “Its aim is to polarise people and its weapon of choice is misinformation. No campaign outfit, Fair Australia, regularly posts things on social media that are clearly false or taken out of context. The Yes campaign is articulating a positive vision of Australia’s future … the Australian people are better than Trump politics from the No campaign,” she said.

>>18998265 Australians’ support for Indigenous voice steady with 60% in favour, Essential poll finds - Public support for the Indigenous voice to parliament is holding steady and remains high, the latest Guardian Essential poll shows, in contrast with other recent polls suggesting support is sliding. The poll of 1,123 voters, published on Tuesday, found 60% of respondents were in favour of the voice, up one point on the previous survey, while 40% were opposed to it. The yes vote still leads in all major opinion polls, but voice supporters and senior Labor government figures have raised concerns about the vigour of the yes campaign as the no campaign grows in volume. A Resolve poll for the Nine newspapers, published on Monday, showed 42% in favour and 40% against with 18% undecided – but when forced to make a yes or no decision only 49% supported the change while 51% opposed it. Last week’s Newspoll showed 46% support, 43% against and 11% undecided.

>>19005407 Yes23 group under increasing scrutiny over Indigenous Voice campaign tactics - Yes23 is under increasing pressure to take control of the campaign for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, as the final vote on the legislation in parliament looms. There are concerns within the government caucus the Yes23 campaign has not ramped up quickly enough, allowing the No campaign a foothold in the debate. A senior member of Yes23 told the ABC, internal polling indicates all six states are still in winnable positions for the Yes camp, and support for the Voice sits between numbers published this week by Resolve, which has been trending downward for some time and dipped below 49 per cent this week, and the Guardian Essential poll which has the proposal holding steady at 60 per cent in favour.

>>19005414 ‘We can’t turn back now’, Linda Burney digs in on Indigenous voice to parliament model - Linda Burney and prominent supporters of an Indigenous voice to parliament are staring down calls to reset the Yes campaign or delay the referendum and reconciliation, with the Indigenous Australians Minister declaring Australia has come too far to turn back now. Ms Burney told the Committee for Economic Development of Australia’s state of the nation conference on Tuesday night: “We have come too far as a nation on this journey of reconciliation to turn back now. We have to go forward. We have everything to gain and nothing to lose by supporting the voice … It is an opportunity to ensure we are getting the best possible advice from the ground. It is a mechanism for us to listen, so that we can make better policies and help close the gap. Because more of the same is not good enough.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188826

#30 - Part 49

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 9

>>19016362 Indigenous voice to parliament will be a distraction from the real problems, writes John Anderson - "The so-called voice to parliament, enshrined in the much-praised Uluru Statement from the Heart, claims to establish a constitutionally guaranteed Indigenous voice in our legislative and executive arms of government. This, according to its advocates, will ensure that the plight of Indigenous Australians is impossible to ignore. By saying so-called voice, I mean no disrespect, but it is misleading to suggest that Indigenous Australians currently have no voice to parliament when each Indigenous Australian has an equal vote to anyone else and, importantly, each state and territory has a minister for Aboriginal affairs, and federally we have a minister for Indigenous Australians. These portfolios liaise directly with many Indigenous stakeholders. Indigenous Australians, like all Australians, have many voices to parliament already. I and many others am simply not convinced that this so-called voice will achieve anything positive beyond a very short-lived rush of joy for those in favour of it." - John Anderson, deputy prime minister and leader of the Nationals from 1999 to 2005 - theaustralian.com.au

>>19016423 The Yes campaign is calm amid the ‘inevitable’ messy phase. But it still has divisions - "Divided on its core message to Australians, the movement to establish an Indigenous Voice is facing its toughest moment. A day before a poll showed the No side ahead for the first time, arguably Australia’s most eminent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson admitted something to this newspaper that none of his colleagues had said publicly: their adversaries were on top. But the major Yes campaign, Yes23, is calm about the referendum’s trajectory. Albanese remains confident that a perhaps unprecedented coalition of elite corporate and sporting bodies and smaller community groups will sway an increasingly cosmopolitan electorate." - Paul Sakkal - theage.com.au

>>19021634 Video: Uluru Statement from the Heart signatories ‘unhappy’ with Indigenous voice to parliament Yes ‘consent’ - Numerous signatories of the Uluru Statement from the Heart were “surprised” to see their names on the document that calls for an indigenous voice to parliament and “unhappy” to be seen as endorsing the statement, parliament has been told. Liberal senator and indigenous woman, Kerrynne Liddle, told the upper house on Friday she had heard from signatories of the statement that they were uncomfortable with their signatures being “interpreted as consent” for a voice. “I’ve heard from women surprised to see their signatures on the Statement, unhappy that their attendance and consultation is likely to be interpreted as consent - but who are not prepared to publicly come forward,” she said.

>>19021683 Shock of recognition as Yes vote for Indigenous voice to parliament softens - "The Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government is in trouble even before final passage of the referendum legislation next week and the official announcement of a poll date – expected to be in October. This is not a subjective assessment but an objective judgment based on what the Yes campaign supporters are saying, what they are not saying, what they are doing and what they are not doing. There are also problems with polling and who the Yes campaign wants to be seen campaigning for the Indigenous voice and leading the public debate. This is a crucial point not only for the Yes campaign but also for Anthony Albanese and the Labor government, which stands to lose so much if the referendum is lost." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19026358 Crunch week for Albanese with no turning back on Voice referendum - The campaign for the Indigenous Voice has reached a point of no return after five years of stubborn argument for the peak body to be enshrined in the constitution. The power and membership of this new group will remain the subject of fierce debate, but the change to the Constitution will be set in cement once the Senate decides on the bill to hold a referendum later this year. The vote is expected from 10am on Monday. The Senate will set the clock ticking on a popular vote to be held within two to six months of the passage of the bill, which means the only way to rethink the wording of the constitutional amendment is to cancel this plan and draft a new bill.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188827

#30 - Part 50

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 10

>>19031491 Senate passes referendum plan, cementing Voice to Parliament vote before end of the year - Australians will vote in their first referendum in more than two decades, with the Senate passing legislation to hold a vote on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament later this year. The Senate vote ends months of parliamentary procedures and now requires Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to set a referendum date, which must happen no sooner than two months and no later than six months. The proposed Voice to Parliament would be an independent advisory body that can advise the parliament and government about matters that affect the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. Mr Albanese is expected to announce a referendum for October, which will be the first since 1999 when Australians rejected the establishment of a republic.

>>19031542 ‘Right balance’: PM defends Voice model as referendum bill clears the parliament - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the power of the proposed Voice to parliament strikes the right balance and has vowed to campaign for a Yes vote after the bill to authorise the historic referendum passed the Senate on Monday morning, 52 votes to 19. The bill cleared the parliament after many hours of debate in both chambers, including an extended sitting of the Senate until 4am on Saturday, paving the way for the Yes and No camps to ramp up their campaigns within local communities. “Some people say this goes too far, some say it doesn’t go far enough. I say we’ve got the balance right,” Albanese said.

>>19031584 OPINION: We now face a momentous reckoning. Politicians must not decide the outcome - "Parliament on Monday finally passed legislation to enable the Australian people to vote later this year in a referendum to change our Constitution. I now look forward to discussions devoid of the political posturing that has poisoned the process so far, because this referendum belongs to the Australian people, not to politicians. It was to the people that the convention of First Peoples at Uluru more than six years ago addressed the invitation to walk together for a better future. Those who signed the Uluru Statement wanted the Australian people, not politicians, to decide whether the Voice should be enshrined in the Constitution and not to be just a creature of legislation. A successful referendum offers much hope. A negative result would doubtlessly be celebrated by the No voters, but they will have to live with the legacy bequeathed to our children and generations beyond. First Peoples would remain unrecognised in the Constitution and denied a permanent voice to the parliament and government." - Patrick Dodson, Labor senator for Western Australia - theage.com.au

>>19031593 Obstacles to the voice risk becoming ever more entrenched - "The final legislative hurdle has been passed for the voice referendum to go ahead on a so far unspecified date later this year. But the obstacles to its success remain and are at risk of only becoming more deeply entrenched. The public polling to date suggests waning support. If the referendum were to be held this weekend the chances of a Yes vote appear slim. This question for Anthony Albanese will be at what stage he is forced into a rethink if public support continues to soften. Albanese says he not for turning. He believes the mood will shift in his favour. But the political pressure on the prime minister will only intensify unless the yes campaign can begin to make up ground." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19031608 ‘Happy assimilation day’: Lidia Thorpe embarks on voice tirade in Senate - Outspoken independent senator Lidia Thorpe has declared the “tokenistic” Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government is the final nail in the coffin that gives her people no power, while wearing a T-shirt inferring the advisory body was fake. The Indigenous senator embarked on a tirade against the voice as her upper house colleagues spent nearly an hour delivering their final contributions on the government’s Constitutional Alteration Bill, which will pave the way for the referendum to be held between October and December. Repeating her previous assertion she was in parliament to infiltrate and “destroy the white supremacy that is represented in this place”, Senator Thorpe labelled the Constitution illegal and wished the chamber a “happy assimilation day”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188830

#30 - Part 72

Australia / China Tensions - Part 10

>>19160144 Solomon Islands, China should publish details of police deal, Australia says - Australia said the Solomon Islands and China should "provide transparency of their intentions to Australia and the region" by immediately publishing details of a policing deal signed in Beijing. The police cooperation pact was among nine deals signed after Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing. A spokesperson for Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia was aware of reports referencing a policing implementation plan linked to a deal signed between China and Solomon Islands in March 2022. "We are concerned that this development will invite further regional contest," the spokesperson said in a statement. "Solomon Islands and China should provide transparency of their intentions to Australia and the region by publishing the agreement immediately, so the Pacific family can collectively consider the implications for our shared security."

>>19160164 America walks the walk in battle for Pacific minds - "NATO leaders gather in the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, this week and Ukraine will dominate the summit. Anthony Albanese will be there. Security is global so it’s positive that he is attending. But we can’t escape our own region. Fortunately, there’s good news here. The US is finally starting to walk the walk in the Pacific. In May, the US signed a Defence Co-operation Agreement with Papua New Guinea that allows the US military to deploy assets to select PNG military bases in the event of an emergency. It’s a nice counterpunch to what China’s got going with Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare in Solomon Islands. If the US-PNG agreement is properly funded and staffed, then PNG will become a key location for the US to build some real influence in Melanesia." - Anthony Bergin, senior fellow at Strategic Analysis Australia and expert associate at the National Security College - theaustralian.com.au

>>19160171 Video: 'Contempt': Popular Chinese social media platform WeChat refuses to front foreign interference probe after repeated requests - Popular Chinese social media platform WeChat has again refused to front a Senate inquiry into foreign interference prompting an outburst from shadow home affairs minister James Paterson. Senator Paterson, the chair of the Select Committee on Foreign Interference Through Social Media, has repeatedly requested WeChat appear at public hearings over concerns of its immense influence in the Chinese diaspora community. In response to the Senator’s July 4 letter, Tencent’s head of corporate affairs legal Elizabeth Byun again rejected the request. The company argued it was unable to attend the hearings on Tuesday because it does not have “local operations or employees based in Australia”.

>>19165653 'Visionary and insightful politician': Chinese media fawns over Paul Keating's criticism of NATO, saying he 'hit the nail on the head' - Chinese media have fawned over former Labor prime minister Paul Keating for his harsh criticism of NATO and its Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. Mr Keating launched a blistering attack on the NATO chief on Sunday, calling him a "supreme fool" for looking to foster deeper connections with Asia as China's dominance grows. The former prime minister, who has continued to defend China's military rise, further accused Mr Stoltenberg of attempting to export "malicious poison" to Asia. China's Global Times, a tabloid newspaper owned by the Chinese Communist Party, published an opinion piece on Tuesday fawning over Mr Keating's remarks. The 800-word article praised the former prime minister for condemning NATO and its Secretary General "without reservation". "Keating is a visionary and insightful politician. We highly agree with his statement. No one has criticized NATO more accurately and vividly than Keating," the article read.

>>19165662 OPINION: Two stern warnings must be given to the arrogant NATO: Global Times editorial - "No one has criticized NATO more accurately and vividly than Keating. His words reflect a consensus among Asian countries. The transatlantic military alliance, which has been expanding and disrupting the security situation in Europe since the Cold War, is now extending its reach into the Asia-Pacific region. Its ulterior motives are well-known in the international community. Inciting division and hatred, creating group confrontations, and causing chaos in Europe, they now seek to disrupt the peace in the Asia-Pacific region. We firmly resist this, together with the majority of countries in the Asia-Pacific region." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188831

#30 - Part 73

Australia / China Tensions - Part 11

>>19165673 NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg shakes off criticism, and praises Australia - Jens Stoltenberg has brushed off “supreme fool” criticisms of his leadership of the NATO alliance as Anthony Albanese emphasised that Australia would be engaged in supporting the alliance’s efforts in Ukraine “for as long as necessary and to the best of our capacity’’. Mr Stoltenberg showed no agitation about the remarks of former prime minister Paul Keating, who criticised him for trying to set up a NATO office in the Indo-Pacific in what he ­ perceived as an anti-China ­manoeuvre. The Prime Minister countered that view with an effusive welcome to Mr Stoltenberg at the opening of the two-day summit, congratulating him on his reappointment for another year, noting “it is very well deserved”, and on his leadership of NATO and what the alliance was doing to promote regional security.

>>19165707 China tensions spur council’s sister city fears - A town on Western Australia‘s southern coast will consider severing ties with its Chinese sister city amid concerns from some councillors that the relationship could lead to “influence and interference” in its affairs and “pressures to sovereign integrity”. City of Albany councillor Thomas Brough will move a motion later this month proposing that the town “respectfully conclude” its sister city relationship with Linyi, in China’s Shandong province. “China has been engaged in economic warfare with Australia since 2020 and political warfare since the mid 2010s. This form of conflict is unfamiliar to many citizens of Western democracies but will be easily recognisable to those familiar with the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist modus operandi,” the report says. “To effectively counter and defeat CCP influence and interference there is a need to expose such operations to the intense sunlight of public scrutiny.” Dr Brough’s report said sister city relationships had been used by the Chinese Communist Party to help enable foreign influence.

>>19165734 Meta says China experimenting with Facebook influence tactics - Chinese agents are spreading targeted misinformation to journalists on Facebook as part of new efforts coming out of the Communist Party state to grow its influence. Meta, which owns the social media giant, removed 200 operations globally for “violating our policy against co-ordinated inauthentic behaviour, and these networks came from 68 countries and operated in 42 languages”, Meta regional director of policy Mia Garlick told the Senate Committee on Foreign Interference through Social Media on Tuesday. In the first quarter of 2023, Meta disrupted two so-called Co-ordinated Inauthentic Behaviour (CIB) networks originating out of China, and although they did not specifically target Australia, Meta said there had been a shift in tactics by China-based agents.

>>19165779 Solomon Islands officially opens embassy in Beijing, 'a big milestone' to further enhance relations between countries and people - Through a ceremony with applause and dances in Beijing, the Solomon Islands officially opened its embassy in China on Tuesday, almost four years after the two countries established diplomatic ties. The Tuesday event, as Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare told the Global Times, is "a big milestone" that is expected to further enhance the relations between the two countries and their people. The ceremony, held in Beijing, was attended by Wang Yi, director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, and Sogavare, who is on his second official visit to China. In the future, through the embassy, bilateral relations between the Solomon Islands and China, people-to-people ties, and shared values between the two countries will be further strengthened, Sogavare told the Global Times. He further noted that China is a great country, and for countries like the Solomon Islands and other similar Pacific Island countries, it would be "very stupid" not to increase cooperation with China and seize the development opportunities it offers. - Shan Jie, Bai Yunyi and Fan Anqi - globaltimes.cn

>>19165800 Zelensky 'to thank Albanese in person' for arms - Anthony Albanese still hopes to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday, the final day of the NATO summit in Lithuania, after a breakthrough saw alliance members agree on a 'clear path' for Ukraine’s NATO membership. The NATO members also discussed a “coercive” China and the risk that poses to security across Europe and the Atlantic. “China is not our adversary, and we should continue to engage,” NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg said, but warned: “Beijing’s increasing assertiveness affects our security” as well as challenging the rules-based international order.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188832

#30 - Part 74

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

>>18939346 EXCLUSIVE: Newly minted Virginia Giuffre stumbles outside NYC court as she's sued for $10M by Rina Oh for publicly naming her as recruiter for Jeffrey Epstein - Virginia Giuffre took a tumble outside Manhattan federal court after she faced Rina Oh who is suing her for $10 million for publicly naming her as a recruiter for Jeffrey Epstein. The two have been battling it out in court since 2021 when Oh filed the lawsuit against Giuffre for defamation, citing a series of year-old tweets that asserted that Oh was Epstein's girlfriend and recruited girls for him to abuse. Oh has said the authorities have agreed with her that she was also a young victim of Epstein 20 years ago and not a co-conspirator or part of his inner circle. The two women were back in court in New York on Wednesday. Giuffre was being escorted from the courthouse with a suit jacket over her head when she suddenly stumbled and fell to the pavement. Security rushed to her side and helped her up.

>>18939352 Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q

>>18998381 Jeffery Epstein: JP Morgan pays out $429 million to victims, allegedly helped facilitate sex trafficking ring - JP Morgan last night settled a lawsuit for allegedly facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring for a reported $429 million. The US bank will pay the money to more than 100 victims of the late paedophile who claimed it turned a blind eye to his abuse of underage girls. Lawyers for the victims welcomed the settlement but David Boies, who previously represented Prince Andrew’s accuser Virginia Roberts, said it was “not enough but it’s close” - a line from the 1973 film The Sting.

>>19103702 'US urges appeals court to uphold Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking conviction - The U.S. government has urged an appeals court to uphold Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and 20-year prison sentence for helping the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls. In a Thursday night filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan, federal prosecutors said none of Maxwell's legal arguments about the fairness of her trial undermined their case, or justified a dismissal or new trial. In her appeal, Maxwell, daughter of late British media mogul Robert Maxwell, accused prosecutors of making her a scapegoat because Epstein was dead and "public outrage" demanded that someone else absorb the blame. Prosecutors rejected her claims that they waited too long to bring charges, and that Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement arising from alleged abuse at his Palm Beach, Florida mansion also immunized her. They also said the trial judge had discretion to conclude that Maxwell's jury was fair and impartial, though one juror failed to disclose during pre-trial questioning that he had been sexually abused as a child. "This case does not present the extraordinary circumstances that justify overturning a jury's verdict based on an error during voir dire," prosecutors said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188834

#30 - Part 75

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 1

>>18928685 Survivor of former Townsville paedophile priest Neville Creen reveals toll the abuse took on her life - "He was supposed to be God's shepherd, but instead he was a wolf in shepherd's clothes, waiting to prey on our innocence and devour us," Megan said. "We had no power to fight him, that's how I feel. I felt I was trapped."

>>18928691 Taskforce Argos arrest 71yo Redbank Plains man at fast food restaurant for child sex offences - An elderly man who brought condoms and chocolates as gifts for a “young girl” he believed to be meeting for sex has been arrested by undercover detectives. The 71-year-old Redbank Plains man was taken into custody at a Brisbane fast-food outlet where he thought he was meeting a school-aged girl. Instead, he was met by detectives from Queensland Police Taskforce Argos who had been posing as the child online.

>>18928705 The Satanic Temple: Think you know about Satanists? Maybe you don't - The Satanic Temple is recognised as a religion by the US government, and has ministers and congregations in America, Europe and Australia. More than 830 people snapped up tickets for its late April convention, dubbed SatanCon. Members say they don't actually believe in a literal Lucifer or Hell. Instead, they say Satan is a metaphor for questioning authority, and grounding your beliefs in science. The sense of community around these shared values makes it a religion, they say. - Rebecca Seales - bbc.com

>>18928713 Q Post #4627 - One party discusses God. One party discusses Darkness. One party promotes God. One party eliminates God. Symbolism will be their downfall. The Great Deceiver(s).

>>18928713 Q Post #4429 - The Armor of God - Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Have faith in Humanity. Have faith in Yourself. Have faith in God. The Great Awakening. Q

>>18928713 Q Post #4396 - God wins. Q

>>18929116 Better the Devil You Know! Conspiracy theorists make shock claims that Kylie Minogue is part of a Satanic cult: 'The Illuminati has a new toy puppet' - Kylie Minogue is embroiled in a bizarre and baseless Satanic conspiracy theory. The Australian pop star, who is currently in the midst of a major career comeback thanks to her new single Padam Padam, has been accused of pushing satanic messaging in her music videos and album artwork. God-fearing conspiracy theorists have pointed out that the cover of the 55-year-old's upcoming album Tension features an Illuminati pose. The Illuminati are a group that conspiracy theorists assert controls the world's affairs and economy, and its members come from the worlds of politics, business and entertainment. In the Tension cover image, Kylie holds one hand over her eye, which conspiracy theorists believe is a reference to the 'evil eye'. 'I don't know who told you to pose like this but it is a symbol of Satanism,' one fan tweeted.

>>18929148 "…a bizarre and baseless Satanic conspiracy theory." - Q Post #3906 - Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements) - When you are awake, you are able to clearly see. The choice is yours, and yours alone. Trust and put faith in yourself. You are not alone and you are not in the minority. Difficult truths will soon see the light of day. WWG1WGA!!! Q

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188835

#30 - Part 76

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 2

>>18940046 Archbishop of Melbourne loses appeal of $2 million altar boy payout - A Catholic archbishop has lost a bid to reduce an almost $2 million court-ordered payout to an altar boy subjected to horrific sexual abuse by a pedophile priest. Archbishop of Melbourne Peter Comensoli launched an appeal of a Supreme Court decision to award $1.9 million in damages to one of former priest Desmond Gannon's victims, after being found vicariously liable for the abuse. Gannon sexually assaulted the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, three times between 1968 and 1970 while he was an altar boy and pupil at a Catholic primary school in regional Victoria. The priest drove the boy out to a remote area where he molested and raped him. He was terrified Gannon would get a shovel, kill and bury him. Gannon was jailed for up to 25 months for the abuse in 2009. The victim said the abuse had impacted his entire life as he continued to suffer poor mental health, contemplated suicide and abused alcohol to numb his pain. He was awarded $1,908,647 in damages, including for economic loss and future treatment expenses, by Justice Andrew Keogh in June 2022, with the judge finding Gannon's abuse to be "horrific". Archbishop Comensoli appealed the payout, claiming it should be reduced because some of the victim's injuries were caused by factors outside of the abuse. But three justices rejected the appeal, finding the archbishop's arguments were unconvincing. The Court of Appeal judges said the victim continued to suffer the impact of the abuse to this day. "The abuse occurred at a time when the respondent was young, extremely vulnerable and dependent on those around him for care and support," Justices David Beach, Richard Niall and Stephen Kay said.

>>18945864 Former Malka Leifer student settles abuse claim with ultra-Orthodox school - A former student has settled a legal claim against Adass Israel School, the former employer of convicted rapist Malka Leifer, over new allegations of abuse connected to the ultra-Orthodox inner-Melbourne religious college. The woman, a member of the ultra-Orthodox Adass community, filed a suit against Leifer and the Adass Israel School over fresh allegations of abuse. She settled the case on Tuesday morning, hours before the trial was due to begin.

>>18945953 Police reopen probe into school board that allegedly helped Malka Leifer flee to Israel - Board members from an ultra-Orthodox Jewish school who in 2008 allegedly helped then-principal Malka Leifer flee Australia to Israel - where she for years avoided justice for sexually abusing students - are back under investigation, despite police previously ruling out charges. Former Victorian premier Ted Baillieu, a prominent advocate for the three sisters who accused Leifer of abusing them at the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick where they were students, confirmed Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Shane Patton wrote to him on Friday to say police had resumed their investigation into the school’s board.

>>18955324 Former head of Adass Israel School board defended sending sex offender Leifer overseas without informing police - The Adass Israel School board acted “as any normal person would act” in helping sex offender Malka Leifer flee Australia, the board’s former president once said. Yitzhak Benedikt, then school board president, was part of a small group who a court said hastily arranged Leifer’s departure at a meeting on March 5, 2008. In late-2016, when The Australian interviewed Mr Benedikt, he strongly defended the decision to help Leifer flee the country despite a count finding that he was aware of at least eight separate allegations of sexual misconduct against her. “We have acted as any normal person would act, we have responsibilities for our children and for our community,” Mr Benedikt said. “We could not allow a teacher like that to stay anywhere near the children. Don’t you agree with me that the best thing is that they don’t have any more to do with the children?”

>>18965915 Ex-MP Milton Orkopoulos taken to hospital after being bashed in jail - Convicted child sex offender and former NSW Labor minister Milton Orkopoulos has been taken to hospital with head, body and leg injuries after being bashed in custody. Orkopoulos, 65, was found injured at Long Bay jail and was taken to Prince of Wales Hospital. “A 65-year-old inmate has received treatment in hospital following an assault at the Metropolitan Special Programs Centre, at Long Bay,” a NSW Corrective Services spokeswoman said in a statement. “Corrective Services NSW takes great care to determine appropriate security classifications and placements for inmates to maintain the safety and security of our prisons.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188836

#30 - Part 77

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 3

>>18987672 ‘Red flags everywhere’: high court asks Catholic church why it didn’t investigate priest’s abuse 50 years ago - The high court has pressed the Catholic church to explain why it didn’t have an adequate opportunity 50 years ago to investigate the extent of a priest’s abuse of children, given there were “red flags everywhere” about his crimes. The court on Thursday began hearing a key case about a legal tactic now routinely being employed by the church and other institutions to permanently shield themselves from abuse survivors’ civil claims for compensation. Institutions are now regularly seeking permanent stays, or a permanent halt to proceedings, by arguing the death of alleged perpetrators and the inability to obtain their response to a survivor’s allegations leaves them unable to receive a fair trial. The approach has infuriated survivors and their advocates, who say the church is now effectively using the passage of time to avoid trial, despite the fact the church systemically and deliberately concealed abuse for decades in dioceses across Australia.

>>19011175 Hillsong founder Brian Houston accused of covering up father’s sexual abuse - Brian Houston concealed his paedophile father’s sexual abuse of a schoolboy amid a church-wide culture of keeping things “in house”, a court has been told. Mr Houston, 69, has pleaded not guilty to one count of concealing the serious indictable offence of another person, arguing he was merely abiding by the wishes of his father’s victim by not going to police. The former Hillsong pastor, at the NSW Local Court for a hearing, is accused of concealing that his late father Frank Houston had sexually assaulted a seven-year-old boy in January 1970. He argues that from September 1999 until his father’s death in 2004, he had a “reasonable excuse” not to go to police because of the man’s unwillingness to come forward.

>>19016485 Brian Houston told thousands of people about his father’s child sexual abuse, court told - Former Hillsong leader Brian Houston did not cover up his father’s sexual abuse of a child and actually told tens of thousands of people, including an annual church conference attended by the police commissioner, a court has heard. Houston, 69, is accused of concealing a serious indictable offence over failing to report the crime to police between learning of it in 1999 and his father’s death in 2004. He has pleaded not guilty. In closing submissions, defence barrister Phillip Boulten, SC, told Downing Centre Local Court his client had a reasonable excuse for not making a police report - that the victim, Brett Sengstock, did not want police involved. The court heard Houston confronted his father in November 1999 and the older man confessed to molesting Sengstock in the 1970s. Houston then informed his father he was no longer welcome to attend Hillsong.

>>19016533 Former football star Barry Cable ordered to pay damages in civil sexual abuse case - A Perth judge has ruled football "legend" Barry Cable sexually abused a young girl who decades later, has been awarded $818,700 for the "catastrophic" damage she suffered. The woman, who is now aged in her 60s, launched the civil action in 2019, claiming Cable started abusing her in the late 1960s when she was 12 years old. She further alleged that after she turned 17, the sexual contact continued, and Cable harassed her until she was in her mid-30s. She sued the now bankrupt former footballer for around $1 million and today District Court Judge Mark Herron ruled the woman was sexually abused by Cable as a child.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188837

#30 - Part 78

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 4

>>19037087 ‘It’s in the psyche of some people’: How predators get close to children - The NSW child abuse squad has arrested 10 alleged paedophiles every week this year and is convicting more and more offenders who infiltrate families, schools and social media to prey on children. But as victims and detectives pay the psychological toll, authorities warn online child abuse content is proliferating in Australia, where tech giants are yet to meet “minimum expectations” in key areas. Detective Superintendent Linda Howlett, in her 41 years with a badge, has questioned countless paedophiles. “It’s in the psyche of some people,” Howlett said. “They’re happy to talk to you about it, they’re trying to justify why they’ve done it. And they believe it.” Howlett commands the 240 officers of the child abuse squad across 19 locations. But they find the same stories everywhere: offenders who are not motivated by money, power or lifestyle but what Howlett calls a “unique mindset”. “Often they’re the people parents couldn’t talk highly enough about,” Howlett said. “They volunteer for school groups, camps, sporting activities, they look around for single parent families to help them go shopping or gardening. They not only groom children, they groom families. You’re not going to leave your children with someone you don’t trust.”

>>19044142 North Melbourne premiership great Barry Cable will be removed from the Australian Football Hall of Fame - Barry Cable will be stripped of his legend status and be booted from the Hall of Fame in the wake of the historical sexual abuses he was found to have committed. The unprecedented decision will be set in motion after next Tuesday’s Australian Football Hall of Fame dinner. Preceding the dinner, the AFL Commission will meet and among the agenda items will be Cable’s eligibility. Afterwards, the commission is certain to officially write to Cable and inform him he will be stripped of football’s highest honour. Cable, 79, is one of the sport’s most decorated players, having played 379 senior games for Perth, North Melbourne and East Perth. He was awarded legend status in 2012. Cable last week was found to have sexually abused a Perth girl for five years from the age of 12, starting at or around 1970.

>>19051251 Notorious paedophile Gerald Ridsdale pleads guilty to fresh charge relating to 72nd victim of abuse - Notorious prolific paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale has pleaded guilty to another charge relating to a historical sex offences. Ridsdale was charged in 2022 with one count of indecent assault of a minor in the 1980s, and today he pleaded guilty to that charge. It comes after the victim-survivor came forward after he was assaulted at St Brigid's College in Horsham by the then-assistant priest between 1987 and 1988. The Ballarat Magistrates Court heard this afternoon the priest told the then-13-year-old boy "it's alright" as he molested him. He was acting as a counsellor to the teenager at the time. The college student is the 72nd known victim-survivor of Ridsdale's abuse.

>>19064589 Jailed pedophile priest David Edwin Rapson admits abusing more boys - A convicted pedophile and former priest who abused six schoolboys in Victoria has admitted historical sexual crimes against children in Tasmania. David Edwin Rapson was in 2015 found guilty of sexually abusing boys, aged between 11 and 16, at two Victorian boarding schools in the 1970s and 1980s. He is serving 12 years and six months behind bars, with a non-parole period of nine years and four months. Rapson, 69, appeared in the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart on Friday, after pleading guilty to three counts of indecent assault against three boys in the 1980s. One survivor told the court the sexual abuse destroyed his faith in the Catholic church and people in general. "(Rapson's) actions caused my family relationships at the time to disintegrate and sent me into self-destructive behaviour, drug addiction, prostitution and petty crime," he said. He said he has dealt with decades of self-loathing and carrying blame and shame.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188839

#30 - Part 79

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 5

>>19082514 AFL Commission officially remove Barry Cable from Hall of Fame - The woman who was sexually abused by Barry Cable when she was a child says the AFL’s move to strip the former player and coach of the game’s highest honours has come “25 years too late”. Former North Melbourne player and coach Cable was immediately removed from the Australian Football Hall of Fame and had his Legend status stripped following harrowing evidence of historical child sexual abuse. As the league defended its handling of the situation, the AFL commission met and considered the matter, including a written submission from 79-year-old Cable, before unanimously voting to strip Cable of his football honours.

>>19087791 Victim of former principal Malka Leifer reveals she lost baby during sexual-abuse trial - A Melbourne court has heard one of convicted paedophile Malka Leifer's victims lost her baby during the trial. In April, Leifer was convicted in the County Court of Victoria of 18 offences, including rape and child sexual assault crimes. She was a principal at the Adass Israel School in Melbourne's south-east in the early 2000s when she was accused of abusing three sisters. She was convicted of abusing two of the sisters, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich, when they were teenagers. The sisters read victim impact statements today during a plea hearing in the County Court. Ms Sapper told the court she had been pregnant during the trial in April. She said while she had to be "torn apart on the stand" as she gave evidence, her child had been like a light, giving her strength. "It gave me the courage and strength to face every day in court," she said. But she said her baby did not survive the trial. "Six days before the verdict we lost our little girl, her heart stopped beating," she said. Ms Sapper said she would never know if the stress and trauma of Leifer's abuse and trial had contributed to the loss of her daughter. "She abused me and I am forced to inherit the consequences for the rest of my life," Ms Sapper told the courtroom, where people could be seen crying.

>>19087815 Malka Leifer: Impact of principal’s abuse laid bare as sisters share their stories - Former Jewish school principal Malka Leifer is “lonely, isolated and broken” inside prison following her conviction for sexually abusing two students. The former religious teacher and principal of Adass Israel School in Melbourne was convicted of sexually abusing two women while they were students and junior religious teachers following a two-month trial earlier this year. She remained still and expressionless as sisters Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper read victim impact statements to the court. Ms Erlich told the packed court she trusted the powerful school community leader “completely” which had now left her feeling like a broken and traumatised adult. “I remember the first time Malka Leifer told me she cared, I was 16-years-old,” she said. “‘I love you like a mother’, she told me. “Malka Leifer you shattered my trust and stole my body and altered my life trajectory, but you could not take my spirit. Today I stand as a survivor.”

>>19087825 Sisters fight darkness after Orthodox principal's abuse - Sisters sexually abused by once revered ultra-Orthodox Jewish principal Malka Leifer refuse to be swallowed by the darkness of what happened to them. Elly Sapper yearned for love and Leifer was the first person to tell her she was loved. Her sister Dassi Erlich recalls the moment Leifer told her she loved her like a mother. It wasn't genuine love but a manipulation that led to years of sexual abuse and trauma. "Faced with the painful truth that her love wasn't real was a betrayal of such magnitude it left me broken," Ms Sapper told Leifer at a pre-sentence hearing in the Victorian County Court.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188842

#30 - Part 80

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 6

>>19087827 ‘Echoes of trauma’ as Malka Leifer victims detail impact statements in court - Persistent nightmares. Crippling mental health fallout. Possibly a lost pregnancy. These are three of many consequences Malka Leifer’s sexual abuse victims say her offending and criminal trial has had on their lives during impact statements given to Victoria’s County Court on the first day of the former principal’s plea hearing. Leifer, 56, watched remotely from a room in the Dame Phyllis Frost prison as sisters Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich delivered summaries of the way her abuse had cast a shadow over their lives, including their relationships, mental health and ability to work. Ms Sapper and Ms Erlich’s sister Nicole Meyer also delivered a victim impact statement outside of court after the jury had acquitted Leifer of allegations made by her. “The scars both visible and invisible persist, no matter the verdict delivered by a jury,” she said. “Her manipulation, control and violation of my body and mind has had profound and devastating consequences in shaping the person I have become. The physical impact remained long after the abuse and continues to be present, with chronic pain, eating disorders and sleeping issues and PTSD.”

>>19087883 Video: ‘Leifer stole my body’: Sisters reveal lasting legacy of abuse by former principal - With the court lectern turned to address her rapist - former ultra-Orthodox school principal Malka Leifer - Elly Sapper stood up, gathered her courage and revealed that just six days before her abuser was convicted, she lost her unborn child. She didn’t know whether it was linked to her abuse, or the stress she had endured at the trial, but it was part of a story of exploitation and loss that began two decades ago and continued in the Melbourne County Court on Wednesday. “What can I do? Nothing,” Sapper told the court. “Because this trauma was done to me, and I am forced to inherit its pain and consequences for the rest of my life.” The miscarriage of her little girl is another cost that forms part of the decades-long fight that has cost three sisters - Sapper, Dassi Erlich and Nicole Meyer - an impossible toll for seeking justice, and one they are still paying.

>>19087902 Dassi Erlich Tweet: Today, was empowering and difficult. It was important to share in our words, the pain and trauma we endured. However, we also heard about the 'hardships' Leifer faces where she attempted to paint herself as a victim of her own consequences.

>>19094002 Inquiry to look at allegations of ‘vile’ historical child sexual abuse at Victorian state school - Allegations of “evil and vile” historical child sexual abuse at a Victorian state school in the 1960s and 1970s will be investigated by a special inquiry that will hear the testimonies of victim-survivors. The premier, Daniel Andrews, announced the board of inquiry on Wednesday morning and pledged to deliver a formal apology to recognise abuse victim-survivors who attended Beaumaris primary school, in Melbourne’s south-east. The apology will be separate to a wider apology the government is due to deliver later this year that will recognise historical child abuse in institutional care settings like orphanages.

>>19094129 Leifer faked mental illness and should be denied sentencing discount, prosecutor says - Malka Leifer should be denied a significant sentencing discount for her time in prison and under house arrest in Israel because she was feigning mental illness to frustrate her prosecution, a court has heard. Prosecutor Justin Lewis also told County Court Judge Mark Gamble that attempts by the former principal of a Jewish ultra-Orthodox school to thwart extradition to Australia may have been intended at preventing her trial for sexual crimes entirely. Leifer, a mother of eight, was found guilty by a jury in April of 18 charges including rape and indecent assault against two sisters, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich, who were former students of Adass Israel School. After a six-week trial, she was cleared of all charges relating to a third sister, Nicole Meyer.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188843

#30 - Part 81

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 7

>>19103576 Video: Glen was sexually abused at Beaumaris Primary School. For 50 years, he thought he was the only one - Glen Fearnett joined Beaumaris Primary School in 1971, as a knock-kneed grade 4 kid. By his first school camp, Fearnett had been sexually abused by one of a number of teachers who preyed on students, operating at the school with seeming impunity in the 1960s and ’70s. He thought he was the only one. It took him 50 years – until other survivors began to come forward – to realise there were dozens of other victims who had suffered like he had. Fearnett believes at least 50 other children were sexually abused during the ’60s and ’70s at Beaumaris Primary School, and perhaps as many as 100 children. “It’s bigger than people could possibly imagine,” he said. “There’s three people [victims] I know who aren’t here with us anymore, for all sorts of reasons, and others whose lives were wrecked … And I think we needed some people needed to stand up and go, ‘Hey, this wasn’t okay’.” On Wednesday the Victorian government joined that chorus, announcing a Board of Inquiry into what Premier Daniel Andrews described as “vile, evil and incredibly damaging abuse” at the school in Melbourne’s south-east. Andrews said the investigation would acknowledge the “unique and evil goings-on” perpetrated in the past by at least three teachers at the school. It will also examine abuse by the same employees at other government schools.

>>19103632 Lack of apology spurred action on decades of school child abuse - It was the lack of an apology that spurred the action. When Beaumaris Primary School victim-survivor Glen Fearnett shared his story about historical child sexual abuse at the school with then Justice Party MP Stuart Grimley, his adviser Olivia Nicholls couldn’t believe the government hadn’t acknowledged what had occurred. Then Fearnett’s story snowballed. The more Nicholls scratched the surface, the more distressing stories she found: other accounts of historical abuse at Beaumaris Primary; evidence of accused teachers being shuffled from school to school; widespread claims of teachers abusing children in other state schools. Nicholls and Grimley spent a year working with Premier Daniel Andrews’ office to seek justice for victim-survivors before the MP lost his seat in the November state election. The government committed to an apology in February. But this week, it went further. Andrews on Wednesday announced a board of inquiry to examine what he described as “vile, evil and incredibly damaging” historical sexual abuse of children at Beaumaris Primary School in the 1960s and ’70s. At least three teachers were involved in perpetrating abuse at Beaumaris and other schools. More than 50 children are believed to have been abused.

>>19104755 Video: ‘I don’t get another chance to get justice’: Leifer accuser - Malka Leifer’s conviction was the triumphant culmination of an international campaign by three sisters - Nicole Meyer, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper – to extradite their former principal and teacher from Israel and bring her to trial in Australia. But as the three sisters held hands in the court listening to the jury’s verdict, there was a terrible sting in the tail. The 18 guilty verdicts against Leifer related only to the abuse of Dassi and Elly. For each of the five charges of rape and sexual abuse relating to Nicole, the jury found Leifer not guilty. The three sisters, so united in their marathon quest for justice, suddenly found themselves landing with a thud on different sides of the law. Nicole had fallen through the cracks, her legacy separated ­forever from her sisters by a jury verdict that had to be respected even if it didn’t pass the pub test given what Leifer did to Dassi and Elly. “I keep hearing ‘not guilty’ looping around in my head,” Nicole says. “I think the verdict has changed everything for me. It’s a very different journey to the one I expected.” Nicole says she now wants to focus on getting her life back on track. She plans to study law next year and hopes to one day become a criminal prosecutor as well as helping victims of sexual abuse. But mostly she just wants to move beyond the shadow of Leifer and the verdict. “I am 37 and she has been in my life since I was 16; that’s more than half my life,” she says. “I wanted so badly to move past having Leifer in my life but it is a lot harder now. I have to figure out a life without her in it. That is the hardest part for me. “But I know my truth and I’m grateful for the support from those who believe me.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188844

#30 - Part 82

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 8

>>19105014 After School Satan Club launches the first-ever summer club - On Friday, June 30, the After School Satan Club launched its first summer club at the Broome County Public Library. At the club, the kids made cat scratch pads made of recycled material. Campaign Director of the After School Satan Club, June Everett, said what goes on in the club is inspired by the 7 Satanic Tenants. Director of the Broome County Public Library, Josias Bartram, said they follow the First Amendment carefully and don’t want to intrude on anyone’s freedom of speech. “Our meeting rooms are available for any non-profit to book and that’s what happens with the Satanic Temple,” said Bartram. “This is not a Satanic Temple, and as with any non-profit that books our rooms, we’re not in any way endorsing them,” said Bartram. - Shabeli Acevedo - wbng.com

>>19105014 Q Post #4942 - https://time.com/collection/great-reset/ - This is not about R v D. This is about preserving our way of life. If America falls, the World falls. Patriots on guard. Q

>>19105014 Q Post #3967 - These people are pure evil. This is not about politics. You are ready. Q

>>19126586 Airport luggage search of Queensland man at Sydney Airport leads to the rescue of 16 children from alleged sexual abuse overseas - A search of a Queensland man's luggage at Sydney Airport has resulted in a record number of children being rescued from alleged sexual abuse overseas. Police say 16 children in the Philippines have been "removed from harm" by local authorities after a major international child protection investigation. The children, the youngest aged 10, were found during raids at four locations in Taguig and Nueva Vizcaya in the country's north. The operation began in January when Australian Border Force (ABF) officers at Sydney Airport examined a Queensland man's bags following his return from the Philippines. They searched the man's phone and allegedly found child abuse material and messages "detailing his intent" to pay someone to sexually abuse children overseas. ABF officers alerted the Australian Federal Police (AFP) who shared the information with the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Philippine Internet Crimes Against Children Centre.

>>19143800 Hundreds caught up in crackdown on sex trafficking, organised crime - Officials have stopped almost two dozen women at the border suspected of being sex-trafficked into Australia, amid a crackdown on organised criminal syndicates rorting the visa system to enable human trafficking. The Australian Border Force is also targeting more than 175 people in Australia and overseas who are suspected of being involved with criminal groups. Since November last year, border officials have intercepted 22 women suspected of coming to Australia from overseas to work in the sex industry. Intelligence from law enforcement agencies suggests not all were entering Australia against their will. The women, who travelled from Vietnam, Thailand, Taiwan, Indonesia, China, Japan, Cambodia and South Korea, were refused entry into Australia on the grounds they were non-genuine travellers planning to work in breach of their visa conditions. Most were intercepted in Sydney and Cairns. Border Force has launched a month-long crackdown on migrant-worker abuses. Officers will visit more than 200 workplaces nationwide across the food, construction, mining and manufacturing industries.

>>19144068 Video: Satan Club returns for summer program - The After School Satan Club is inviting the community to participate in its summer program. The ASSC, sponsored by the Satanic Temple, is a national organization that recently established a presence at Homer Brink Elementary School in Endwell. The Satan Club summer program takes place at the Broome County Public Library. The campaign director for the club, June Everett, says that each meeting is unique and promotes activities that relate to the seven tenants of the Satanic Temple. Everett says that the purpose of the Satan Club is to teach kids how to be a good person, not to stir up controversy. “We’re not looking to create controversy, we’re not looking to upset the community, we just want to have an inclusive, fun, inviting place for those that don’t always feel comfortable sending their children to an Evangelical Christian Bible club,” said Everett.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188846

#30 - Part 83

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 9

>>19144068 Q Post #4545 - Humanity is good, but, when we let our guard down we allow darkness to infiltrate and destroy. Like past battles fought, we now face our greatest battle at present, a battle to save our Republic, our way of life, and what we decide (each of us) now will decide our future. Will we be a free nation under God? Or will we cede our freedom, rights and liberty to the enemy? If America falls so does the world. If America falls darkness will soon follow. Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy. This is not about politics. This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow. We are living in Biblical times. Children of light vs children of darkness. United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4545

>>19165808 Barry Cable removed from Sport Australia Hall of Fame - Disgraced AFL footballer Barry Cable has been removed from the Sport Australia Hall of Fame. The decision comes after a Judge Mark Herron found in the District Court of Western Australia in June that Cable had repeatedly sexually assaulted a girl during his playing career. The civil matter was brought by the complainant, and was not a criminal prosecution. The judge also found there was compelling evidence Cable also abused other children. Sport Australia chair John Bertrand said his board decided on Friday to strip the once-esteemed footballer of the national honour that had been bestowed on him. In making the decision, the board said: “Induction into the Sport Australia Hall of Fame is reserved for the best of the best. Those who are inducted into this elite group have not only excelled in their chosen field, but uphold the character traits of dignity, integrity, courage, modesty and pride. “Cable’s actions are contrary to the values of the organisation, and as a result his SAHOF membership is revoked immediately.”

>>19165824 Police speaking with Barry Cable's sex abuse 'victim' - Police are speaking with a woman found to have been repeatedly sexually abused by Barry Cable amid the possibility of criminal charges against the disgraced footballer. After a civil trial in the District Court of Western Australia, Judge Mark Herron in June found Cable abused the victim over five years from 1968 when she was aged 12. Judge Herron said there was also compelling evidence the now 79-year-old, who has denied all allegations, had violated other children. WA Police Commissioner Col Blanch said he had to be cautious in commenting because of the sensitive nature of sexual offences. But he confirmed police were talking with the now 67-year-old woman. "We are speaking with the victim and the family, and we've got to make sure that we take every step appropriately through this and support any victim of any sex offence as best we can," he told ABC radio

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188849

#30 - Part 84

Qanon / Conspiracy Theory Hit Pieces, Australia and Worldwide

>>18939681 ‘Drowning in lies’: Turnbull warns Taipei audience of internal threat to democracy - Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has told an audience in Taipei that lies and disinformation spread by “wicked” local actors poses the greater threat to democracy than from external threats such as authoritarian nations. Renewing his long-waged battle with Rupert Murdoch and his media stable, Turnbull cited Fox News, and said misinformation was not simply spread by conspiracy theorists at their keyboards but by established media. Fox News last month settled a $1.17 billion lawsuit with voting machine maker Dominion Systems for broadcasting lies peddled by Trump and his allies over the 2020 presidential election. - Jono Thomson - taiwannews.com.tw

>>19021795 ‘I was wrong’: Trump grows stronger, can beat Biden and topple US democracy, pollster fears - Leading US pollster Frank Luntz says Donald Trump can re-win the presidency and that if that happens, US democracy could collapse. Luntz said he was wrong to declare in 2021 that Trump would never again be president. “I now have to acknowledge that it is a distinct possibility that Donald Trump could be elected president - I did not believe that one year ago,” he said. “I did not believe that the search of Mar-a-Lago would be handled so badly, I did not believe that the indictment of him in New York would be handled so badly. “I did not believe that his opponents would be so inept as to actually strengthen him and the combination of all of those makes him now viable, not just in the Republican primary but in the general election.” - Latika Bourke - theage.com.au

>>19021837 Donald Trump could still have a shot at the presidency despite his legal troubles. But is Anthony Albanese prepared? - "Anthony Albanese probably didn't think there was much chance of Donald Trump returning to power when he openly criticised the then US president during his final days in the White House. Albanese, still opposition leader at the time, said Trump had "encouraged" the January 6 insurrection in 2021. He labelled it a direct assault on "the rule of law and democracy". The Labor leader also suggested Trump's foreign policy approach "saw the first steps in a retreat by the US from its historical role as leader of the post-war international order". These comments were made from a position of relative diplomatic safety. Trump had already lost to Joe Biden, who would be sworn into office within days. There was little risk in joining the chorus of criticism being levelled at such an outrageous president on his way out the door. Surely the man in the red MAGA cap was done. And yet, more than two years later, now Prime Minister Albanese is being urged to prepare for the very real possibility of a Trump return." - David Speers - abc.net.au

>>19021887 ‘Good morning #Australia’: Trump’s social network Truth Social comes Down Under - "Australians can now join the Donald Trump-founded social media platform Truth Social after geoblocking that prevented citizens from most countries from accessing the website was removed. Last week, former congressman and CEO of Truth Social Devin Nunes announced that the Twitter clone was available to users all over the world. Last Monday he “truthed” - the platform’s verb for posted - a message specifically welcoming Australians. “Good morning #Australia Glad to have you here @truthsocial,” he said, replying to a truth from an Australian user whose profile bio contained QAnon hashtags." - Cam Wilson - crikey.com.au

>>19051082 Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers reports rise in social media abuse, misinformation - "As Australia gears up for a referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, the national election watchdog has reported a rise in abuse from social media users spreading misinformation over its voting process. Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers said the tone of online comments on its posts about recent elections and the upcoming referendum voting information has been "aggressive". A rise in social media misinformation followed false claims made by former US President Donald Trump in relation to the voting process during the 2020 presidential election. Mr Trump accused an electronic voting system widely used by authorities in the US of deleting or switching votes in an attempt to pin the blame for his loss to President Joe Biden. Mr Rogers said the commission was working to address both the misinformation on the electoral process, as well as online threats to staff ahead of the upcoming referendum on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament." - Daryna Zadvirna - abc.net.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188972

File: 3197e40022693e4⋯.jpg (153.01 KB,1280x853,1280:853,OZ_Damper.jpg)

NEW OZ BREAD

Q Research AUSTRALIA #31: MAGIC SWORD - IN THE FACE OF EVIL Edition

>>19188850

>>19188850

>>19188850

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5d5ef6 No.19188977

File: 9f9b4417d1078b5⋯.jpg (3.16 MB,2800x2000,7:5,Chairman_of_the_Joint_Chie….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]