Yes. However, Benito Mussolini's Fascism should not be equated to the far superior National Socialism, which is the most based thing which ever existed.
So called "Western Capitalism" is not Capitalist at all - true Capitalism, like true Communism, has never been tried. What has been tried, however, is kike-puppet imperialism, which is what is commonly mislabeled as Capitalism.
Kike-puppet imperialism is the combination of a relatively free market in the homeland which extracts resources from colonies to fuel stupid bullshit. This is inherently damaging to the psyche of the volk, as Imperialism removes the connection between Blood and Soil, and Slavery removes the connection between Blood and Blood, forcing the nation to commit precious military might to maintaining slavery, or risk browning.
Slavery, as an institution, is notoriously weak against kikes. This weakness is not a uniquely American phenomenon, as the kike-on-a-stick Jesus greatly weakened the institution of Roman slavery, causing slaves to not care about work as they would be saved in the next life anyway - so they simply became indolent for a significant period of time, until Paul fixed the issue - but by then, it was too late. Additionally, we all know how easily Rhodesia fell to the communists. Too easily, in fact.
Kike-puppet imperialism, like all imperialisms, always ends in ethnic replacement and libshits: two things all too common in the Roman Empire. The presence of these two forces, ethnic replacement and libshits, often lead to a form of fascism which arises in the government.
However, as I stated before, Fascism is NOT National Socialism. National Socialism does not arise out of "ethnic replacement" or "libshits". National Socialism arises when a COLONIZED, BROKEN nation decides to RISE UP against UNFAIR, 8 NATION ALLIANCE OR OTHER BULLSHIT TREATIES, and aims to RESTORE THE DIGNITY OF THE NATION. Fascism is reactionary, but National Socialism is revolutionary.