a24a99 No.178644
The Free Speech Coalition is a California Lobbying group known for its work with the porn industry. Its publicly listed stances are being anti-condom, anti-STD testing, and anti-records keeping. This ties into their legal battles such as with Statute 2257 of the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act. #FSC
Did you notice that they do not name Ashcroft vs The FSC on their website? They'll talk of two onerous provisions, but they won't name the case. Because if they did, you'd read the law yourself and realize the FSC is aiding child pornographers.
Naturally the group is far left, to the point of attacking Christianity and religion in general. They fund studies which deny porn addiction and regularly promote the legalization of prostitution. I highly recommend suspicion when faced with any of their proposals.
https://youtu.be/xm9IJqbl78M
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
a24a99 No.178645
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178647
>Naturally the group is far left
So dead center?
>muh left right dichotomy that makes zero sense in any reality
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
01d741 No.178653
>>178647
>child pornographers are centrists
Kill yourself.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
586236 No.178654
>>178644
>Naturally the group is far left, to the point of attacking Christianity and religion in general.
That isn't so much "far-left" as it is jewish.
If you really want to play the jew-party game, John Stagliano is heavily involved, and he executive produced that "The American Dream" animated short that lolbergs loved. Jonestein even sold the DVDs.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2bd6a9 No.178660
>>178644
In what way are they aiding child pornographers? All they did was raise the issue that a law that prohibits images that "appear to be children" and prohibit speech that "convey the impression of minors engaging in sexual activity" is a violation of someones freedom of expression and it is. The FSC isn't so much "far left" as they are libertarian, they don't want an authoritarian government controlling what they can and can't say, what art they can and can't create.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
01d741 No.178699
>>178660
>OY VEY I HAVE THE RIGHT TO SIMULATE SEX WITH CHILDREN, YOU FILTHY FUCKING GOYIM
>OY FUCKING VEY MUH FREADUMPF
Literally the same spam that all jews have said, constantly.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178708
>>178653
see;
>>muh left right dichotomy that makes zero sense in any reality
Not sure if nigger or redditor.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178709
>>178660
>child porn is art
Fuck of lolberg.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
01d741 No.178725
>>178708
>child pornographers are dead center
>OY VEY GOYIM THERE IS NO DICHOTOMY
>LOL YOU CAN’T READ BECAUSE YOU READ EXACTLY WHAT I SAID
Kill yourself.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
3de234 No.178743
>>178709
Many of the greatest artists we revere today would've been imprisoned as "child pornographers" under that authoritarian law and much of their art would've never seen the light of day.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
01d741 No.178745
>>178743
You’d be wrong. Fellate a shotgun.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
3de234 No.178753
>>178745
How would I be wrong? Because you don't want it to be true that authoritarian meddling strangles the life out of cultural work like art and literature?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
01d741 No.178757
>>178753
>wow I say things only jews say and with no evidence or explanation
>ha ha how am I wrong
Fellate a shotgun.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
3de234 No.178770
>>178757
The only one with no evidence or explanation is you despite being asked, if you have nothing to say then why bother posting?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
e608e6 No.178771
>>178770
>lol you don’t have an explanation for why raping children is bad lol
Fellate a shotgun.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178789
>>178743
False. They actually produced art. Not cartoons for the purpose of jerking off to.
There's quite a difference.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178792
>>178753
>authoritarian
>authoritarian
>authoritarian
Stop calling things which are acceptable but generally classified as totalitarian as that.
Makes your nose show.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
3de234 No.178799
>>178789
Where in the law does it determine that its purpose has to be for jerking off for it to be illegal? The answer is nowhere, the things you subjectively define as art would be just as illegal as the things you subjectively define as fap material.
>>178792
You're splitting hairs, authoritarian and totalitarian are synonymous.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
e608e6 No.178801
>>178799
> authoritarian and totalitarian are synonymous.
Guess how we know you don’t belong here, yid.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178802
>>178799
>You're splitting hairs, authoritarian and totalitarian are synonymous.
see;
>>178801
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178803
>>178799
>Where in the law does it determine that its purpose has to be for jerking off for it to be illegal? The answer is nowhere
Obscene.
Says it many times. ALL porn is against the law.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
e608e6 No.178805
>>178803
Ooh, do you know the story of how porn became “legal”? If you do, awesome. If not, story time for everyone!
Pornography was eventually legalized thanks to the efforts of ✡Al Goldstein✡ and his Talmudic abuse of the legal system. US obscenity law at the time regarded violations as appealing to “prurient interest,” meaning “having express sexual interest or purposely causing stimulation.” In his trial, Goldstein’s defense lawyers asked the prosecuting witnesses (the people who brought the complaints, and who didn’t like pornography) whether the material–specifically his magazine, Screw–brought them sexual excitement. The witnesses replied in the negative, varyingly that they were shocked or disgusted by the content. The lawyer then claimed that “the content is not in ‘prurient interest’, therefore it should not be banned by law.” Seriously. This is really how it all happened. This is how the floodgates of the sexual revolution were opened. This behavior. This psychology. This judaism. In single court cases, individual judicial rulings, and under false pretenses from start to finish, all around the world. This methodology was thereafter applied to a far broader range of obscenity, and the First Amendment was used as the excuse for the destruction of healthy society.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
3de234 No.178807
>>178801
>>178802
Prove me wrong.
>>178803
The western world is so puritan and driven by pedo hysteria that any display of nudity from someone under 18 is seen as obscene, you just have to look at its reaction to a movie like cuties that came out of a much less prudish french culture that doesn't find nudity obscene as a showcase of that.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178808
>>178805
>not in prurient interests because these goyim aren't degenerates
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
c74c98 No.178809
>>178807
All sexualized, glorified, and degenerate nudity is obscene.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
3de234 No.178812
>>178809
You aren't the arbiter of obscenity and if you think an innocuous movie like cuties is in any depicts "sexualized, glorified, and degenerate nudity" then your head would spin off your body if you were to watch a movie like pretty baby that came out before that law was even enacted.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
612450 No.178817
>>178805
Thank you. Where can I read more about the legalization of porn?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
01d741 No.178838
>>178817
Well, there’s Merchants of Sin, by Benjamin Garland. It’s a book specifically about the history of how jews manipulated and controlled American (and further Western) outlook on sexuality and society through the last few centuries. And then there’s Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation & Political Control, by E. Michael Jones. Yes, yes, to those who want to complain about EMJ; the book itself is at least interesting to give some deep thought over from a psychological perspective, regardless of your feelings on the man.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
01d741 No.178839
>>178817
>>178838
Ah, here’s an introduction to Merchants of Sin.
https://merchants-of-sin.com/introduction/
If you want to buy it (or obtain it in some other way, but it’s a white guy exposing jews so he probably deserves support), that’s there, too.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
612450 No.179030
>>178839
>>178838
Thank you bro. I will definitely buy his book.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
07419e No.179250
>>178645
FACT: that's a terrible choice of font
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
604fb2 No.179257
I use to be just against child pornography, but now I'm against ALL pornography. It's all jewish degenerate garbage. The porn industry must be eradicated!
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fccc5a No.179596
>>178644
> being anti-condom
… But why?
> anti-STD testing
But why being both anti condom and anti STD testing? Chlamydia for everyone lol?
> and anti-records keeping
records aren't a problem at all if the medical dossier is closed for everyone unless user consent is given.
They're pro child porn spread, pro porn spread, anti censorship of porn and against claims of porn addiction and dependency.
When you look up their management all you see are fucking kikes as usual. Also this thread seems to be full of pro cheese pizza lolberts and COOMERs.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
