[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/philosophy/ - Philosophy

Start with the Greeks
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
Flag*
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


[ Literature ] [ E-books ] [ Politics ] [ Science ] [ Religion ]

File: 1463287577013.jpg (107.59 KB,1023x800,1023:800,1455401217000-0.jpg)

71d4ba No.4025

Hidden microphones that are part of a clandestine government surveillance program that has been operating around the Bay Area has been exposed.

Imagine standing at a bus stop, talking to your friend and having your conversation recorded without you knowing. It happens all the time, and the FBI doesn’t even need a warrant to do it.

Federal agents are planting microphones to secretly record conversations.

Jeff Harp, a KPIX 5 security analyst and former FBI special agent said, “They put microphones under rocks, they put microphones in trees, they plant microphones in equipment. I mean, there’s microphones that are planted in places that people don’t think about, because that’s the intent!”

FBI agents hid microphones inside light fixtures and at a bus stop outside the Oakland Courthouse without a warrant to record conversations, between March 2010 and January 2011.

Federal authorities are trying to prove real estate investors in San Mateo and Alameda counties are guilty of bid rigging and fraud and used these recordings as evidence.

Harp said, “An agent can’t just go out and grab a recording device and plant it somewhere without authorization from a supervisor or special agent in charge.”

The lawyer for one of the accused real estate investors who will ask the judge to throw out the recordings, told KPIX 5 News that, “Speaking in a public place does not mean that the individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy…private communication in a public place qualifies as a protected ‘oral communication’… and therefore may not be intercepted without judicial authorization.”

http://archive.is/Egl6P

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/05/13/hidden-microphones-exposed-as-part-of-government-surveillance-program-in-the-bay-area/

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71d4ba No.4026

>>4025

Op here. To me it's not wrong at all for the state to do this. We allow private citizens to record without telling anyone, why should it be different for the state. (although I do have a proclivity to believe that citizens rights should be equal to or greater than the power that leads them)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71d4ba No.4028

>>4025

that image is unacceptable because it doesnt mention is also the only president to pay off the national debt.

as to your post im happy to hear that you are ready for the mandatory anally-implanted recording devices that awaits us in the near future.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71d4ba No.4029

>>4026

are you telling e that the state is a person?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71d4ba No.4030

>>4029

Of course not. The state is a spook made of people.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71d4ba No.4037

>>4025

There is nothing cool about what Jackson did to the injuns. As for the rest, yep, pretty awesome guy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71d4ba No.4066

>>4037

he was trying to relocate them where there would be less conflict with settlers. the trail of tears was not intended to be genocidal

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

71d4ba No.4070

>>4025

Read Foucault

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

069d55 No.5395

The state (allegedly) is supposed primarily to secure and safeguard their citizens. Most citizens do not want to be secretly recorded, and a real public servant would serve the public by preventing them from being secretly recorded, rather than doing it themselves.

The state is not what it's supposed to be, and indeed it's normally the primary threat a citizen faces. Expecting it not to privately record things and then randomly abuse this privilege is terribly naive in current year +2.

>>4037

>The injuns would have done it to Jackson if they could have

>Jackson should have let them, because it's not wrong when they do it.

Even if you don't think that's your argument, that's where your argument ends up. If you don't like how war works, quit life.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]