>>5054
Rather than Satan (Semitic, Manichean, Romantic), Lucifer (PROMETHEUS >>4958
, Hellenic, Zoroastrian, Classical). Recall the importance of self-mastery, and of the Overman that appears as atavistic superior individual quality in history. Rather than being a necessary Hegelian historical function, a metaphysical algorithm for the appearance frequency of Carlyle's 'Great Men', suppose it is epigenetic on a societal level, the Overman merely that 'gene' which responds to conditions of life in order to bring the organism to peak performance/fitness. The indefinite existence of a culture or people, only to live on past glories isn't enough, "All pleasure desires deep, deep eternity." So it may be just as well that the Enlightenment killed Him in the name of 'Truth'.
Perspectivism
In what sense was that undertaken though, killing God? We can't prove a negative. The project was vain. But in the development of the Romantic-Resentful-Modernist, beyond simple geopolitical dominance of Europe is the civil war for the composition of Western value structure(s), which in both senses has brought ourselves - and the world - to crisis. Bolshevism, from the early anarchism and socialism dabbled in by Wagner with Bakunin nearly sealed the fate of the classical, and eternal character of Europe for the Romantic/resentful/godless Universal Slave Morality.
Master Morality and Natural Law
"No Gods, No Masters." -- Nietzsche's consistent disdain, and association of Romantics, Socialism, Anarchism, and Feminism with Slave Morality is less well articulated beyond examples given from antiquity, sporadically supplied . . .
So to end with the beginning, to answer OP's question: Those that are so dearly invested in proving the negative - of God's inexistence - back all these leveling ideologies and trends witnessed over the past century and a half since Nietzsche published Beyond Good and Evil are worth stopping and opposing at any cost. It is pragmatic to advocate for opposing positions to their own
>Rev 2:9: “I know your works, tribulation, and poverty (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.”
>Rev 3:9: “Indeed I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie–indeed I will make them come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.”
Self and World: Mastery
The world denying Christians missed the point of the glad tidings; the Manichean, Gnostic, Semitic heresy of the God created world (for ourselves) as fallen, ruled by a Demiurge is false. Where does that leave us in relation to the teachings of the Son of God, if the world is not merely a vale to be suffered and past through:
>Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
We have an entire system of natural law built through the middle ages, integrated into our legal systems and technology with which the entire earth now runs according to our techno-industrial imperatives. Those now will be subordinated to higher, eternal, eugenic values concomitant with civilization proper, or we - and humanity - will spiral down a road defined by the end goal of Last Man. If we suffer the wicked to rule, God's grace is not ours. If we are called wicked in turn, no further concessions need be made to accommodate the mendacity of Last Men and their slavish resentment. The Devil will quote scripture to suit his purpose, it need not be ours.
>tl;dr Yes, OP; there's a degree of hermeneutics that can justify about any reading, but only by following possibilities to their depths can other things can be ferreted out from the dark; the interesting falsity can be of greater value than the mundane truth for learning; FN requires some echolocation to make the correspondences harmonize (I am no man, I am a depth charge!). Without it, Thus Spoke Zarathustra's connection to AntiChrist can't be parsed.