[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / cloveros / cuteboys / erp / fast / hydrus / in / strek / tftg ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

Ya'll need Mises.

File: f2750bd3dbeee03⋯.png (464.02 KB, 932x550, 466:275, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.98851

Is it legitimate to go to war to destroy the value of competitors to comparatively raise the value of your services on the market?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.98854

No.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.98855

Yes.

But the reason America and European growth is stalling is due to socialism, social stagnation, increase in number of laws, and a growing welfare class. All of these are fixable problems and fixing them costs less than invading China.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.98857

>>98855

Fixing these give funds to invade China anyways

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.98863

Illegitimate, as in conforming to international law, maybe, if they have casus belli. Should they? No, because war destroys wealth and lowers overall market value.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.98867

It's not legitimate, but it's Aldi not practical. War is near always a net loss for both parties involved—it is only when the one who instigates war is not the one who bears the costs of it that it becomes common, as is the case in democracy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.98868

File: b01ebacccfc0e0b⋯.gif (142.4 KB, 322x395, 322:395, OY VEY.gif)

The answer to all questions of this nature is "Yes, absolutely…if you can get away with it.". Think of war like any tool of trade or politics, and you'll understand how and why nations go to war. It's not the most honorable thing, but it's more or less how it goes.

Hell, the West intentionally destabilized the entire middle east just to preserve the value of the petrodollar(something extremely important for trade and a corner-stone of the USA's hegemony over the globe)

>>98855

This, this and precisely this. Also, nuking China would tank the US's market so until the US can flip around to being a primary exporter again it's probably not ideal to outright nuke China. That said, it gives the US massive power when it comes to embargoes and sanctions.

>>98867

>subtle Israel reference

Oy vey!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.


[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / cloveros / cuteboys / erp / fast / hydrus / in / strek / tftg ]