>>95924
>China blocks you from selling your catgirl in it
This does not come at no penalty to China.
If (you) are the manufacturer with the most optimal production process, alternative options will be considered by catgirl consumers in China. The one that is most commonly used is using a legal loophole to sell catgirls in China anyways, much as legal loopholes are used to sell Chinese goods as Made in (Not China) goods elsewhere. Second, catgirl consumers may seek other suppliers who produce catgirls at a higher price, or lower quality for the same price. Thirdly, there may emerge a black market for catgirls. Barring these measures, catgirl consumers potentially experience a shortage. Furthermore, any industries in China that rely on catgirls as an intermediate good will be affected. Overall there is a net societal loss, as clearly evidenced by the shitty state of everything in China. (Of course this is of no concern to a highly corrupt, centralized authoritarian government that has no concern for its people, but if it makes you feel any better, you're not the only person suffering. Also, the more government interference there is, the higher the probability of ancap rebellion).
>China bootlegs your patents
IP is a meme and there have developed massive market distortions over the concept that ideas can be property.
>B-b-but who will invent the things?
It may surprise you to hear this, but companies actually pay people (outside of the company) to develop open-source software.
https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Without_Intellectual_Property#Computer_software
Also, China being anywhere near as powerful as the USA is a meme; the reality is that it is a third world dictatorial shithole LARPing as a first-world country.
Go back to /pol/ and try again.