/liberty/ - Liberty

It's not, Not Sees were the original big-brained centrists who called for a Third Way. Things have just gotten so fucked that even centrism is considered "far right" nowadays. Just look at Trump, policy-wise he's a 70s New York Democrat, but compared to what passes for the left these days he's an ultra-right radical.

We've already plumbed the depths of what fascistic states look like and found them wanting: outside of obvious war-time concessions, they look an awful lot like moderate democracies with particularly popular leaders.

Until the Era of Great Works finally commences, every government is a nuclear silhouette of what a post-fascist state actually looks like and should be treated as such.

Perhaps the closest to a true 'far-right' endgame are North Korea and Eritrea, but the minds behind those hellholes are shortsighted enough that they utterly fail to leverage the carnage they leave in their wake. They chase idealistic versions of a normal libertine life but fail as their markets and methods fail to match that of even basic Enlightenment design.

That is not what far-right looks like, it's the step immediately before it, every bit the transitional state to true Fascism as Socialism is for Communism, both entrenching a single central power.

The true dichotomy is revealed there: the left supersedes massive power structures to meet the will of many as best it may, while the right is a unified will that supersedes and controls the many for the pursuit of a massive power structure.

(increasingly) Fascist Germany in its day made great strides through the Autobahn, but the United States and others that followed suit demonstrated that the "Great Work" of yesterday is the "Standard Affair" of today in the form of massive networks of highways that dwarf the original. Now, collectively, countries pool resources to produce new wonders at a snail's pace.

This is inferior even to the empires of history, who in the eyes of their emperors saw monuments built in a day and last for an eternity, still impressive but only in the sense that "these people accomplished something that was seemingly impossible for their time."

A modern far-right state should go out of its way to violate every code of ethics and human right imaginable if they stand in the way of the Space Elevator or an Orbital Ring. If it's the free market stopping them from overturning mountains and putting livable spaces for hundreds of thousands of people in their place, utterly destroy it. The Great Leader's pyramid should be able to be seen from the top of the Great Leader's Other Pyramid on the moon with a magnifying glass and made of rare metals synthesized through wildly inefficient processes that said country mobilized to perform because they fucking could, and that's what they were called to do.

Given all that we have seen throughout history, that is what a real "far-right" country looks like. Impractical, improbable, and a strategy that fills a niche that left-wing viewpoints simply cannot; it is a propellant, the human equivalent of gunpowder, to shoot humanity forward in the most spectacular and dangerous and absolutely inhumane way possible.

The Reich rates a 6/10 at best, only a good bit better than modern Germany's 3/10, and again most of its totalitarianism was explicitly influenced by war-time concerns rather than a true zeitgeist. Wait for WW3 to crop up and watch how pointlessly murderous the current ~happy liberal utopia~ regime will get.

>>92156

>pyramid-building as in any shape right wing

>pyramid-building propels a nation forward

Hi Keynes.

NEETsoc is a big fucking joke. A form of totalitarianism superseded by more effective methods generations ago. Now it only serves as a convenient antithesis to trick vulnerable, dogmatic retards.

>>92159

Keynes is an economist and principally concerned with the economy, nothing I discussed cares in the slightest about markets or economics in general.

That's the split that makes sense. If leftists pursue more emergent and uncontrolled structures (like the free market) and far-left thought wants them to be totally uncontrolled and tempered, then right-wing thought should be characterized by a rejection of emergent and uncontrolled structures (like regulations and arbitrary law) and the far-right would be a total eclipse of that paradigm.

A far-right country wouldn't build a pyramid to "propel a nation forward", that's dumb. What is 'forward'? What's the point of 'moving forward'? It's not a race, so much as left-wing thought's focus on efficiency and therefore meritocracy has made it one.

A far-right country would build those pyramids to scar the earth, and the moon right with it. Because in a thousand years, when all have forgotten the rest of us, that country will still be talked about in hushed tones and with great discomfort.

The human race has many scars from past, almost exclusively from prototype far-right countries. They existed before they could fulfill basic human needs effortlessly, but still managed to construct their arbitrary and single-minded legacy. We speak of the Romans and the Mongols who overturned our languages and broke our genes on their back to such a degree the effects are still obvious today, of the Colosseum and Trajan's market, not impressive by today's standards but incredibly difficult by contemporary ones, and more importantly, permanent and lasting. We do not speak of the caliphates, who left little but religious relics (honoring an emergent and uncontrolled institution) and devastation in their wake, or much of the Achaemenid who for all their people and all their land only managed to build a mausoleum at a tenth the size of the largest of the Pyramids, the one at Giza, built two thousand years prior.

You will know what a far-right country looks like when it stares down modern problems that others struggle to address through half-measures and market means and says 'I will fix that and I would love to see anything try and stop me'. If a fairweather government like the United States could make the Suez Canal, what must modern man be capable of with that sort of singular focus?

A country that would hear 'emissions management', look to its factories, and instead invest almost all of its floating capital into biological research to generate extreme carbon-fixing phototrophs and then unflinchingly releasing them without regard for the consequences, given that if it succeeds then it's a triumph and if it fails then they have brought the world closer to man's own image.

A country that would see 'immigration concerns' and upon issuing directives to root out what few non-citizens such a place might receive and then proceed to build an impossibly Big Beautiful Wall, not because it's the "right" or "best" solution, but because it's the one that will last for centuries and those Ming assholes have held the world record for far too long.

That's what the extreme of the right wind sounds like and looks like: a despotic regime with horrible standards for life and its people and a singular will that transcends all debate and standards of human decency, an antithesis to the apathy and slowness engendered by freedom. Accept no substitutes.