/liberty/ - Liberty

Does the NEET card's cost account for all expenditures, or do you have a competitive advantage that reduces costs compared to clients buying/trading for all of these things on their own?

Will it accrue profit fast enough for you to support yourself?

Does it provide more benefit to anyone/everyone involved compared to traditional or even predatory investment schemes?

Will you monetize in the form of NEETbux?

I can't pass fair judgement without at least this much info, so at the moment it's really a roll of the dice.

hit enter on a dice box and it posted, and the dice didn't even roll, goddamnit

>>88864

>Does the NEET card's cost account for all expenditures

Yes and no, but preferably yes. Actually, now that you got me seriously thinking, it will be much cheaper for everyone if the company were to make the expenditures itself and provide the housing, food, transport, healthcare and basically the whole NEET life, rather than to pay for someone's expenses.

>Will it accrue profit fast enough for you to support yourself?

Earning profit is kinda the goal, so hopefully.

>Does it provide more benefit to anyone/everyone involved compared to traditional or even predatory investment schemes?

Well, if the company provides every single thing like a nanny, supporting someone would be much cheaper than if they didn't use the service and had paid for all their expenses themselves, so yes, everyone does get a benefit. Though the original business model I had in mind was a joke and a predatory scheme, similar to how a casino or a lottery operates.

>Will you monetize in the form of NEETbux?

I'm considering either a monthly NEETbux allowance or a "chicken tendies" point system.

>>88862

You're never going to pull that off with anyone who actually wants to be a NEET. None of them would have saved enough to afford it. At BEST you're offering a decent retirement plan for people who have the capital to make the investment, which is not something that is new anyway.

>>88871

t. roastie

>>88862

All you've really done is create a retirement home. And since your "lump sum" payment for the NEET card will have to be higher the longer someone is expected to live, even if you don't put in an age limit older folk will make up the vast majority of your clientele. Add in the fact that the only real advantage to your system vs just buying all this shit for yourself is that you don't have to "worry" about the minutiae of the day-to-day, and yeah, your customer base is all old people with a few incredibly lazy rich kids sprinkled in.

>>88877

A theoretical opening would be a competent matchmaker with a whole lot of useless land. By making preferential and mutually profitable deals with underutilized firms (Sure, we wont pay you quite as much for catering as an individual, but I can guarantee you exclusive access to my business as long as you lock in at these rates per person for X many years. It's not like you have much other clients right now, right? I'll put in a good word with my affiliate company Y, too, etc etc) and networking so that you can get a wide swathe of services at rates that allow you to comfortably skim off the top even despite charging your own clients less money than it would cost to buy these services individually, to pay off investments, and very eventually, yourself. Bonus points for varying up payment methods so people can take your not!NeetWalmart and use it as a investment-deposit, you'd have to be wary of inflation depending on how currency and fluctuating demand was handled.

That's assuming there's a market for it of course, and a whole lot of other things, but in some circumstances it could be a feasible business model.

>>88881

True enough, you make good points. I'm not saying there's no market for this. But I still think retired folk are going to make up the bulk of the clientele, especially if OP is adamant on the lump-sum-for-life payment model. Even if alternate forms of payment were available, I think the limited choices and flexibility imply limited adoption by able-bodied, working people. So it would still act mostly as a retirement home, with secondary niches of cripples with a pension and trust fund babies. So the kind of people most likely to be socialists.

>>88883

Or amateur athletes perhaps?

test