>>105245
>That's why I'm getting of the idea that the only way to get more freedom is not just spreading ideas but by imposing freedom on others, using the State or any form of coercitive power the society is under.
I agree, it's called "ask for forgiveness, don't ask for permission". If you ask for permission to help normalfags, you'll most likely hear "no", just do the right thing and say you're sorry after you've helped them, and things will turn out much better for everyone.
>The guy improved the situation a lot, but he did have to coerce people into this improvement. I mean, do you think Georgia would have gone anywhere with libertarians just spamming ideas and never taking any action?
Saakashvili is based, he even tried to become the president of Ukraine to carry out the same reforms there.
>with ideas like trans child prostitutes
See, I think any discussion involving children should be the foundation of libertarian rhetoric. It's impossible to talk about how great everything will be in ancap when you're constantly hit with "but muh child prositutes", "but think of the children". The best way to deal with strawmen is to pre-emptively disarm them, so you have to know exactly what will happen to the children, and explain it in a way that fits in with the rest of your ideas.
>If you support leftists ideas, you get support from the left. If you support some libertarian ideas, libertarians will find where you aren't libertarian enough and won't support you.
This is what sucks about libertarians, it's like herding cats and whatever, but I think everyone more/less supports libertarian ideas, so instead of shilling for the whole package of something that sounds as edgy as "anarcho + capitalism", we must definitely shill for individual ideas which everyone can agree with. It's like a puzzle, you can't sell the whole picture, but selling individual pieces of the puzzle until someone ends up with the whole picture is extremely effective, and this should be our #1 strategy.
>>105247
>The answer to every "gotcha!" thrown at you by statists always comes back around to following in line with the NAP.
Statists don't understand how the NAP works, they just assume it's pacifism or some shit. You're explaining meta-systems to people who have an IQ of around 100 and a one-dimensional understanding of politics.