>>102918
>everyone seems to follow class/wealth envy?
I don't think most people do. It's just that the ones who do tend to be awfully loud about it.
>>102950
Education isn't nearly as influential as incentives.
>>103007
>we are already living in anarcho-capitalist land
"Anarcho-Capitalist Land" is essentially defined by the absence of certain types of institutions, which are very much present. Thus, we are not in "Anarcho-Capitalist Land". Nearly all of the positive elements necessary to produce order in Anarcho-Capitalism are present, but that is not its definition.
>the natural response to anarcho-capitalism is the formation of states
You're going to have to do a lot of work to back that up.
>Essentially, liberty is to high-energy a state, and groups of people will naturally move towards lower-energy states, in order to dissipate the energy and create structure.
What does that even mean? In what sense is liberty "high-energy"? How do you justify conflating liberty with a lack of structure?
>>103020
>we need grassroot propaganda and education
It's nice for recruiting True Believers(TM), but mass adoption doesn't work that way. You have to make your way of doing things materially more appealing than the alternatives. That's not education or propaganda: that's marketing.