/girltalk/ - Girl Talk

>>19640

On one hand, being childsafe has kept kids from being able to access a lot of illicit materials (making improvised exploding devices, access to drugs, etc)

On the other hand, we just keep catering to the wants and needs of the youths resulting in shorter attention spans due to easier access to instant gratification.

Obviously, what needs to happen is for people to stop catering to the wants of kids.

Back then, newfags were told to 'lurk moar', games required you to read manuals before playing, and there was a sizable audience for slow-burner books and movies.

Today, newfags are being fed sources, games are 'press x for awesome', and nobody watches movies that aren't capeshit or some other popular shit with the same copy pasted stories over and over, let alone read books.

But it would be naive to think that companies and other powerful people would stop this practice.

Not only is being a nanny great for PR, it sells, and is a great way to make people conform to ones' worldview.

>>19640

They do it with no one's consent. Only their boardrooms of investors and special interest groups deciding these sorts of changes on society, unlike less "private" countries, where they usually have someone corrupt and vile enough already in office to do this kind of stuff from the get-go. Just kill them.

>>19642

>They do it with no one's consent.

They do have your consent.

Facebook, YouTube and every other online service have policies available for anyone to read.

The moment you use their services, it's implied that you have consented to their policies.

>>19643

You do not decide whether they make these changes. Only the people who pay for their companies and order their laws do. Kill them.

If you wouldn't want your children to be accessing disgusting media, why are you digesting it yourself?

I wish I could go back to the days when I had more innocence. Frankly, I'm so sick of the world's immoral agenda, I yearn for a life within a community of like minded individuals who build each other up. I envy the amish.

Few even recognize the spiritual destruction of merely watching a 'conservative' youtuber bringing awareness of demonic teachings in the media, schools and culture. I'm at the point where I've unsubscribed to most of these commentators because their content isn't edifying, but rather desensitizes viewers to these horrors.

Children shouldn't have access to youtube uncensored. It is too easy to fall down the rabbit hole. Until a young person's abstract thinking has been developed along with a strong moral compass, everything they absorb should be supervised and discussed to help them become their own critical thinkers.

If there is anything children should watch, it should be educational and provide access to information difficult to reach otherwise. If you live in Australia, here's what a Canadian moose looks like, or if you live in Canada, here's what a kangaroo looks like. Here's a documentary on how cars are made. Here's what a remote African tribal song and dance looks like. Compare it to your own culture. Here's what some of the most powerful classical concertos sound like performed by the top musicians of recording history. Fill them with good and wholesome content so that it is easily recognizable when they see modern media.

But never unsupervised. It's too easy for anything to slip in, like a comment on youlube or a news article.

The longer you abstain from modern media be it youtube, movies, tv, vidja, the stronger of a negative reaction you will have when you introduce that media back into your diet. You'll realize even what you thought was 'tame' is repulsive. Go out, read a book, educate yourself, and learn a new skill or hobby.

And those children not in our communities, what about them? Are you going to dictate to another parent what they can and can't teach their children? Parents who let the tv do the babysitting need to grow up themselves.

>>19661

Wow, you're such a hipster your children would come out with waxed mustaches.

I'm honestly the most scared about how specific and user-targeted algorithms control every contentstream and how AI has the capability to fundamentally alter a user's mind

>>19640

I'm not concerned about this and I'd rather it wasn't raised at all. There's already enough censorship of the internet and the last thing we need is to give leftists and politicians more power over us by giving them another seemingly moral reason to take our freedoms away for our own good.

This is just a symptom of a much larger problem that should be dealt with first. You mentioned that there is an economy that prevents us from raising their own kids, and that's true, the government robbed us to the point where it is now necessary for both of the parents to work to support the family, while leaving our children to be raised by propaganda in public schools and by parentless hooligans outside of schools, either that, or for whatever reason you have single moms who unwittingly do much worse for the development of their children than anything the internet can throw at them.

It's just first-world-tier nitpicking at non-issues out of boredom while ignoring the fact that it is a blessing upon humanity.

>>19663

Same here, there are times when an algorithm (in any site) goes a little crazy with some results when you search something innocent like toys or something.

I miss the 1990s-2000s internet where you were told never to never identify yourself and give out personal details. The same risks are there, just people ignore it more.