/fur/ - Furry

>>82148

I'd suck it tbh, also everyone else should also post their (male) fursonas for me to masturbate to

I'd post my sona but I've only ever gotten busts drawn and my own art isn't good enough to.. make sense at all.

>>82154

He must bottom for a fox, because his back has the mark of Zorro.

>>82160

Ha.

>>82151

Do it.

Just means there's less autism to blind us with.

>>82173

wow don't be rude I'm not auts nor am I an otter

>>82180

Are the markings paint or stickers?

>>82137

It can't be any worse than rasha's oc

>>82182

the strawberries, stars, and buttons? pins on the glasses, piercings on the ears.

>>82184

Nifty! I like the whole look and character.

>>82154

6/10

>>82180

4/10

>>82181

5/10

>>82193

4/10

>>82196

you rated me the same as the shitty not-raccoon? yikes

>>82199

Oooohhh, don't forget about the piercings and those glasses, they don't even hang onto anything! Ouch my dude.

>>82196

Hey 6/10. I'll take that.

>>82196

Why 5/10 for mine, may I ask?

>>82202

Nothing really special about them honestly. NPCs/Background characters.

>>82199

>>82200

lmao sounds like you're a solid 0/10 irl my dude

>>82137

ima keep it real with you chief your color scheme is atrocious but hair over eyes is top tier despite what these faggots say

>>82203

hate to break it to you m8 but 99.999% of people are basically npcs/background characters. isn't it egotistical for everyone to make characters that are "so interesting" they would be a main character of any story involving them? or do you like rate up people for being special shitty snowflakes because they have something special about them??

>>82208

>I wanna see some personality, you dimwit.

>Or you know, maybe the artstyle is turning me off.

So you're judging a character based on nothing substantial but how it was drawn?

What if I supplied a lengthy 5000-page comic that goes into the complex detailed backstory of my character to provide its personality? Also, how is having long floppy ears not personality? Just think of how useful those things are! You can hug people with the ears, you can rub their penis with those ears. They're perfect. You're dumb.

>>82203

Would you prefer to know something about them? They're definitely not NPCs or background.

Sierra Winchester, on the left, is the host of a radio show. On the left, dressed as an archeologist, holding an Inca artifact (a prop sent by a fan of the show). On the right, her broadcast position, at the studio's pipe organ. She's a fan of 20s and 30s style in general; she and her radio character, Katie K, are amateur pilots.

On the right. Benoit runs a greenhouse. He's also a stripper at a fancy club; his stage persona is( female) Sarah Scarlet. He's an easygoing type with zero temper.

You'd be welcome to ask questions about them.

>>82137

>>82148

>>82154

>>82180

>>82181

>>82193

Awful chracters, delete them off the internet to save yourself the embarrassment of being associated with this trash

>>82213

I'm not mad, let alone fucking mad. I just wanted to point out your bias. :^)

>>82213

I mean fwiw I agree, my fursona is a representation modeled after who I am and who I want to be and that's a solid 4/10

>>82213

You told me what you didn't like, and I gave it. Are you trolling? Or is there some more specific reasoning?

And very well. I'm not really complaining, so much as trying to genuinely understand what people dislike about my characters.

>>82219

Why does he have two personas of seperate genders? Why does he strip?

>>82220

He strips because he finds it fun. Big on teasing. It's also an outlet for some of his sleight-of-hand ability. He got into it after a friend, who'd done it for years, found a club that was trying to get away from sleaze (no table/lap dances, no touching the dancers). He wouldn't be comfortable in one of the common type of strip clubs.

He considers himself trans, but isn't really firmly so. He's comfortable presenting as either gender, but male is the default he's chosen. Sarah is a persona he plays, and is really no more than a stage persona. He doesn't appear as Sarah Scarlet anywhere but at that job.

>>82212

Someone is jealous they didn't get a 6.

>>82223

Hey listen man, I'll suck you off for a 6

I like seeing how people react to a sona that had effort put in it vs like seeing how people dont want to have their characters stand out in fear of being judged for something that in the end is just for fun

>>82181

the lynx is cute, 9/10

left fox is good, right fox looks like it carries a katana

>>82241

the only honest sona in this thread

7/10 for that

>>82235

would be much better if the artstyle was more complex

>>82218

7/10, lose the crown and give her proper feet

>>82180

>glasses

>ear piercings

yeah that's a 2/10

>>82193

go away not n8

>>82148

possibly the worst thing in this thread

>>82246

Thanks on the lynx. And no, the fox isn't a neckbeard type. That's only when you put a fedora with a stained D&D shirt and grody jeans.

On the girl with the crown, she's the ruler of a micronation which, in that setting, is recognized as a sovereign city-state. She rarely wears the formal clothes on the right; usually she sticks to casual stuff with a crown pictured somewhere on the shirt. By the feet, you mean digitigrade?

>>82223

>thinking I would post my OC here

lmao

>>82255

Why?

Do you think it makes your character less shit if you don't?

>>82248

yeah, digitigrade always look better imo

though your characters are at least consistent one way or another, so that's good

>>82252

the hats have such a stigma to them at this point I wouldn't bother

>>82256

My character is amazing thank you very much

You wouldn't even understand how great they are even if I posted them

>>82249

P.S. That guy you posted does look like a dbag but that's because he's wearing a cheapo trilby, has a t-shirt under his vest, and is carrying a katana for some unknown reason. He looks like a reject from an anime. Button up the dress shirt, put on a necktie (and not a clip-on), swap the pinstriped stingy-brim for a plain black fedora with a white hatband, toss the cheap sword in the dumpster, trim the sideburns, and he'd look fine.

>>82257

Sorry, didn't see your post. They have a stigma on the internet. In real life, put on a fedora-- NOT a pinstriped trilby from that trendy shop at the mall-- shave properly and use deodorant/brush your teeth, get some dress shoes and a suit, and go out in that... and see how many compliments you get vs. insults or derisive looks. You'd be surprised at how many people tell you that you look great.

The stigma exists because of guys who think they can go out in a tee with pit stains, cruddy dirty pants, stringy hair and a month's worth of facial hair, toss a cheap trilby on top, add some overwrought olde-tymey slang, and think they're now a lady magnet.

>>82267

>the smirk is still just laughable

That's just, like, your opinion, man. Really, though, it's the internet opinion-- you could probably post Frank Sinatra in a suit and fedora and people too young to know him would go, "who's this clown, where's his neckbeard and sword?" Sarah looks nothing like this 2nd katana-douche, either. This guy is even worse, crappy shirt and sweatpants. At least the first guy had a nice two-piece suit, even though it was wasted on him. Sarah's going for the same sort of faux-vintage look Michael Jackson did, though with a dash more class with spats.

But yeah, that's a pretty good setting for her. Backgrounds in the kind of necessary detail cost more than I've got, but you found a pretty good photo. Mind if I save that and share it around?

The only background stuff I've really had done was Sierra at the organ console. That was one of the most complex single objects the artist has drawn, it's based on a real one and I had him trace the basics from a photo to get it closer to real (most of the finer detail is freehand). Pipe organs in radio stations used to be a thing. Sierra voices many of the female characters, and plays the accompanying music, with one other guy who does all the foley not available in the theatre organ's battery of sound effects, plays most male characters, and narrates.

>>82137

Yikes

>>82270

>Mind if I save that and share it around?

It was a 30 second google search followed by 5 minutes of editing, feel free.

>That's a pretty good setting for her

I assumed it was what you already intended.

The character looks like a Lackadaisy reject.

Is he from a modern setting then?

Because that's way worse.

>Sarah looks nothing like this 2nd katana-douche

Think you're focusing too much on literal appearances and clothing.

There's a reason you can show someone a picture of orange over blue, bang a steelpan, and get them thinking of a tropical sunset by association.

>>82137

It's not the worst, but, it's still pretty bad. Mostly due to the coloring.

>>82272

>Because that's way worse

Do you have anything else beyond "the internet says fedora = edgelord"? Yes, Benoit's made for a modern-day setting. And as fun as this criticism is fun to read, I like him as a character, so in the end I don't really care if anybody assumes he's a weeb because he wears a certain hat.

Incidentally, I'm a hat-wearer (of all sorts - top hats, fedoras, homburgs, though I don't own a trilby). I only wear them with a suit & tie; if I'm in casual clothes, I don't wear a hat. In close to twenty years of doing so, not one person has made comments about me being a weeaboo-- probably partly because I wear a three-piece suit, tie and dress shoes and I know what hygiene is, but also probably because I don't wear a cheap pinstriped trilby and talk like a reject from a 1900s romantic novel about the "upper crust."

>>82276

I'm really diggin' this guy. What's his story? Not sure on species...? Has sort of a Mideastern vibe about him, Aladdin the street thief.

>>82242

As much as I'd like to post one of my characters I'd rather stay anon.

>>82137

Cringe colors; could be decent if they were natural. Hair over the eyes is lame, though. 4/10

>>82154

Donks are decent, though his back-fur marking is oof. 7/10

>>82180

Smelly dumb hybrid scum. Pick just one accessory instead of dumping the jewelry box on your face. 3/10

>>82181

Lynx is alright, 7/10

Fedora-fox though, even if you defend it with muh classy, it's still tainted. 4/10

>>82193

Looks like a twink bear with runny mascara. 5/10

>>82218

Are you drawing these yourself? Full white is boring, get some kind of natural looking marking to spice it up. 4/10

>>82235

No fatties 2/10

>>82241

>facial hair on furries

Other than that it's non-offensive enough for a 6/10

>>82275

Pixel art, huh. Gotta agree with >>82276 on the asymmetry, otherwise he looks like a bad enough dude if a bit of a manlet. 7/10

>>82276

Big ears save lives; though you're one to talk about asymmetry mister one earring. 8/10

>>82289

Gryphon 1/10

Fox thing 4/10 for the puke looking color

Jasumi 3/10, purple is fine as an accent but there's too much accent. Keep it to like the feather tips and tail, drop the circuit looking dot-lines.

Slin 2/10 from the makers of tumblr nose brings tumblr belly and tumblr knees

>>82295

No, because I want to fuck Klonoa.

>>82295

>Do you dislike Klonoa's design

Yes. He's dumb and highly overrated, in exactly the same camp as Tails. Yeah, I know, the official shotacub character number is small enough to count on one hand, but seriously. It's garbage.

>>82283

>What's his story?

Still working on it, but he's the son of a wealthy merchant from a group of desert nomads.

A common practice is to break off from the group and settle down once one of them ends up doing well enough for themselves that constantly being on the move becomes an issue for inventory management. So he's currently living in a more temperate location rather than traveling the desert now.

Trying not to go into too much detail though.

>Not sure on species...?

Jerboa

The ears and the tail feel right, but I'm planning on shortening the arms a bit and possibly shaving his feet.

Still not sure where I want to set the scale on how far I'm anthropomorphizing him.

>Has sort of a Mideastern vibe about him, Aladdin the street thief.

Exactly what I was going for.

After his family left the desert, the clothing out there became overkill so cutting it down to this became necessary.

He doesn't mind though, he honestly prefers it to the pile of loose wrappings he had to wear all the time as a kid.

>>82293

>though you're one to talk about asymmetry mister one earring

Ya got me.

I guess it just bothers me because of how pronounced it is.

The pin and chain >>82275 has don't bug me at all, but the sleeves are torture.

>>82293

>No fatties 2/10

But boney girls are lame

>>82307

You mean girls are lame.

>>82300

Well that's fine then, at least you're consistent. I just really like long floppy ears. You can do so much with them, it's like a thneed =w=

>>82311

I think it needs to be thrown into an incinerator, and you along with it.

>>82260

Zoinks.

>>82308

>being gay

>2018

lmao

>>82314

Long ears are fine, so long as they look like ears and not weird scarf-like ribbons with zero structure.

>>82293

No, I'm not drawing them myself. Dr. Javi is the artist. No arctic foxes, ermines, etc. for you either, I'd wager, since they, too, lack markings.

>>82306

I really like him now. Nice work!

>>82314

Like a thneed. I dig.

>>82311

Can't say much without color. Looks like a pony dressed like Rock Dog.

>>82318

You’re gay

>>82336

>Ears longer than natural or even sensible

Eh... as the owner of a character who has a tail longer than he is tall for no reason at all aside from that I like it, I can't really criticize it just for that. If they looked like long-ass rabbit ears or bloodhound ears, that would be okay. I still wouldn't LIKE it, but it would be okay.

>>82357

dumb necklace, two tails meaning he's a kitsune yet you didn't do creative with the design itself

also that fucking name

3/10

>>82362

Really like the first pic, the last pic doesn't really look appealing to me, but anyways, he's fucking adorable. What does he do exactly? Some sort of military general? Is he single, by any chance?

I'd rate him an 8/10. Definitely not like the generic fox posted before and colors that don't give one a seizure.

>>82364

thank you!

the ones in red are just outfits from a videogame, the other three are essentially just what he wears normally, I suppose. it's supposed to be like a naval uniform

>>82365

He still looks fine nonetheless! Is he from any place in particular? How old is he? Does he have a name?

>>82357

You'll get shit on for the Japanese name and having two tails, but he looks okay to me. What's his backstory?

>>82362

Looks good.

>>82367

Understandable. The name's alright. Okay, that'll be enough from me.

>>82370

a long time ago I did write something short up, based on the setting of a novel a friend of mine is writing, but neither of us really consider this to be canon either way

>>82371

So you just turned Judy Hopps into a slutty snowflake character..

>>82373

I expected to get roasted, but I thought at least people would be creative.

>>82373

It has zero kobold traits aside from "horns" that look more like hair fluffs. You can't call it a hybrid and then make it 99% only one species.

>>82362

Get a commish from Pelzigenguillotine. He'll be able to pull off the uniform/clothing in a very good way.

>>82411

Sure I can. Furries do it all the time. Kobolds don't exist at all, and there are a zillion different styles they're drawn in anyway. Who says I need to conform to anyone's standards but mine?

Captcha: EBOFIZ. That's totally an alien brand of soda pop.

Anyhow, kobold traits for her are indeed horns and fire... and her build and body type. Kobolds there are short and thick. But kobold females don't have breasts (same for dragons in this setting, no dragon boobs either).

>>82421

>Furries do it all the time.

So you want to be just as shitty as them?

>Who says I need to conform to anyone's standards but mine?

You don't.

Doesn't make it good though.

I can understand not caring that people recognize it's trash you made for yourself, but if you're going to try and defend that garbage you should have a good reason to back it.

Posting a character you already know is bad and going to be harshly criticized in a thread for people to give their opinions on characters, just so you can turn around and tell them you don't care about their opinions is either lying to yourself or a stupid waste of your own time.

>>82424

>Posting a character you already know is bad

Now you're putting words in my mouth, I don't think my character is bad. I think people here tend to tear you apart no matter what. Everything is either too specific or too generic, too common or too rare, too weird or too ordinary, too detailed or too plain. I think my character works quite well in the setting for which she was designed.

I love opinions, but "your character sucks" isn't helpful enough to put much stock in. I posted my kobold a few times before, and most responses were essentially "your character sucks because I like kobolds drawn a different way, you should be ashamed of that shit." I don't find those helpful in any way, but at least I can laugh at them.

When opinions foster some real discussion, I'll happily chat.

>>82421

>Everyone else is jumping off bridges, too!

>There is no official design so if I decide a kobold looks like a purple cactus, that's fine!

>Implying bunnies aren't also short and thicc

Yeah, no amount of excuses are going to change that it's a shitty design. Here's a protip: if someone can't tell what species a hybrid is supposed to be just by looking at it, it's a failed design. Fails the "show, don't tell" test inherent to ALL art forms.

>>82425

LMAO

GOT HIS ASS HAHAHHA

>>82154

douchebag chad normalfag hairdo

>>82426

>I think people here tend to tear you apart no matter what.

Your Bobcat seemed to get some praise, and she wasn't the only one.

>>82275 >>82276 >>82154 and >>82362 all got middling to positive responses.

Not everyone is going to shit on your character out of some feeling of obligation because the website has chan in the name.

I mean some will, but not all

>>82411 gave you some actual criticism about your hybridization balance too, and all you did was tell them you don't care what they think she should look like because you aren't trying to please them.

Which is fair, but why even respond at all then?

If you weren't going to actually refute their point by bringing up her lizard-shaped tail or something else they might've missed or isn't immediately obvious, then why not just stay silent and laugh at their comment like you say?

Admittedly, you did try and use her "build and body type" as an argument but that kinda falls flat when anthro rabbits tend to have the same stature.

I'm basically saying that maybe the reason your characters get bashed often enough that you think it's the only response they're going to give you is because most of them are just that bad.

>>82427

>Everyone else is jumping off bridges, too!

>There is no official design so if I decide a kobold looks like a purple cactus, that's fine!

LOLwow

>>82434

I get it, I'm just saying it seems to amount to "I think your character has issues, which means your character objectively has issues." I'm just poking fun at that, but I suppose I'm being a bit harsh. In the past, ALL of my character posts have been torn apart, usually with my "everything seems to be derided as either too this or too that but never a good middle" responded to with the equivalent of "damn straight, if you don't like it you can fuck off," which begat my tendency to laugh at *all* criticism.

>>82441

Then why have you bothered posting at all? If you're just going to assume that your characters are totally amazing despite what people say (and despite legitimate rational critique) while being a smug asshole about it, you're wasting everyone's time.

>>82451

>If you're just going to assume that your characters are totally amazing

It's not that, really. I'm sure they have flaws, more or less depending on the person. But most (not all, but most) of the criticism here seems to be about "I think your character design is awful, so it IS awful," and I enjoy laughing at that. I'm glad to see polite criticism. I'm amused by crap like "the internet says fedora = edgelord, so your character is an edgelord." One of the people in that bit offered some friendly suggestions about a themed background, which was excellent.

>>82218

First one is decent, if a touch dull. Main complaints are the totally humanoid look.

2nd one is cringe. Looks straight out of Minecraft

>>82459

>I think your character design is awful, so it IS awful

So you disregard it because they believe their own opinion?

Do you just want people to lie about what they think or something?

Don't ignore people's criticisms like that if they're actually pointing out what they think is wrong.

Obviously "It's bad" doesn't help.

However if someone thinks a character fits a certain stereotype and says why they feel that way, there's no reason to just brush that aside entirely.

Of course you're not going to start making changes based on what one person thinks either, but if people begin agreeing or you hear similar sentiments from others then maybe you missed the mark you were aiming for.

It's up to you when something might be off and what to do about it (if anything), but don't ignore criticism entirely regardless of how big a dick someone is about sharing it.

That doesn't make it any less valuable.

Why did you come up with these characters anyway?

Do you have any plans for them, things you'd like to do with them if by some miracle you ever got a chance, or is coming up with them just a thing you like to do for fun?

>>82362

It brightens my day seeing people still using the art I did them, glad to see you're still around

>>82510

>nipple and dick piercings

soft 0

>>82510

How's the stocks?

>>82510

What the fuck is this raiting system? Also its from the discord name I use. Also, I wanted to do something to make him different, otherwise he'd be a generic donkey. It's made from the donkey cross.

>>82510

>nipples

>piercings

>external balls

>human dick

Easily one of the worst here.

>>82524

Its just how he does it, he's retarded anon.

>>82462

>So you disregard it because they believe their own opinion?

No, I just disagree. But I only disagree with sarcasm or such if they're a jerk about it.

>Do you just want people to lie about what they think or something?

Honesty is good. Assholishness is funny.

>However if someone thinks a character fits a certain stereotype and says why they feel that way, there's no reason to just brush that aside entirely.

I know, and I don't think I do, exactly. "You've got a special snowflake" isn't helpful at all, that's just "you're an idiot" reworded. The comments that the internet will see a fedora and feel a certain way are understood, but when it boils down to "your character is a weeaboo, 'cuz the internet says so," I laugh and poke fun back.

>don't ignore criticism entirely regardless of how big a dick someone is about sharing it.

I think it's perfectly possible to have a very negative opinion but put it reasonably. I'll still look over the criticism when someone is a dick, I'll just be a bit dickish back sometimes.

>Do you have any plans for them, things you'd like to do with them if by some miracle you ever got a chance, or is coming up with them just a thing you like to do for fun?

They're for roleplay with a group of friends, in a setting we've created. Mixed fur/human/scale, current-day USA. Space travel exists and some violence/wars have been dialed back (and the current President isn't extremely controversial).

I did post these for real opinions. I have kinda-sorta trolled with another one, not posted here, in the past, but won't do that now. She's a pop/rock performer who dyes her fur in many bright colors. She was supposed to be a sparkledog (that was very much intended) but without the rigid requirements in fur patterns or accessories.

>>82510

Your burd is neat. Not big on the massive ween (it looks like it'd get in the way) but if you like it, go you! I love the Eye of Ra design; in the right usage, it can look spiffy, and here it does. Nipples are a bit odd on an avian, but then, this *is* all fiction.

How does your rating system work? What's "light" about?

>>82532

The trolls think they are fine when they make a "point" in rhyme.

>>82532

>my porn character in an edgy post apocalyptic image

>>82528

looks like it's a bit of auts too

>>82535

This makes no sense.

>>82535

I'm confused.

>>82536

Sounds like a fine enough guy, who just happens to have two tails.

>>82540

>>82537

It took like several threads of his shit but I finally get it. Imagine it like a 100-point scale where you see the tens digit and get an idea of how close/far it is from the next tens digit.

e.g. Mine was 5/10, but it was "decent" (1.3-1.6) so it was about halfway to a 6/10. I... Don't really understand why this is necessary, but I know what it means.

>>82510

Who the fuck is kekero

>>82550

Thanks, I get it now! It seems unneccesarily complicated, but I assume the person has a reason for doing it that way.

>>82535

>The light means that it is not really an average of a score indicating something along say a 1.0-1.3, while a decent is anywhere from 1.3-1.6, and a strong is a 1.6-1.9 and so on.

So it is exactly what I assumed.

It's still fucking stupid.

>>82560

>>82551

Shitting up the thread

>>82550

kekero is earfig one of the people who run the inner circle of fur along with aced bui nasen and a few others iirc.

>>82597

Rito are kino, but the base bird is pretty garbage.

Biggest issue with the charizard is defaulting mega.

I mean there's also the fact that they're both based on pre-existing IPs, but whatever.

Not offensively bad, but not good either.

>>82601

Terrifyingly huge eyes, get a refund

>>82597

That charizard is not okay. Far from okay. Pokesonas are already enough of a symptom of ASD as it is, but you had to go and put glasses and human clothing on it

The bird is cute and all - I just wish you would stop using other people's intellectual property as a basis for your characters. Please get some semblance of creativity into your noggin lad. Continuing down this path will just make you look bad.

>>82578

sounds like a nerd

>>82510

Oh god it's this autistic fuck again

>>82601

I like your goat. Nice design.

>>82752

Nice trash panda. I like his colors. They're unusual without being crazy.

>>82148

Gonna share some porn of the fuck boi?

>>82752

Hate the color pattern. Yellow is ugly as fuck to begin with, but with this, it just looks like a shitty jumpsuit.

Also, your penis is horrible.

>>82510

hot as fuck

>>82685

these proportions are just awful, what are you doing with your life

>>82786

>edgelord dragon

>speshul autism glows

>a slut

0/10 please slash your wrists

>>82786

The bad anatomy ruins him.

>>82786

>a switch

truly the worst type of person, just pick sub or dom, jesus

>>82781

It's supposed to be a golden brown as on actual grey foxes, but that's the limitations of solid shading for you. Also probably due to different monitor settings; I tend to keep mine on a low saturation because I'm used to CRTs, while most of the time factory settings, especially in newer models, everything is OOO BRIGHT COLORS WOW! so it probably looks more muted for me than it does for you.

>your penis is horrible

The man has x-ray vision for drawings and can see right through a sheath. Amazing. This must be the world's lamest superpower, but at least it's something.

>>82825

>just pick sub or dom, jesus

You should ask /christian/ whether Jesus was a sub or dom. Could be funny.

>>82788

>Complains about bad proportions

>Thinks the beefcake bird is hot

>>82852

Beefcakes are always hot retard, don't try to make excuses just because your oc is total shit if it's any consolation you're better than edge dragon over here, you're a 2 instead of a 1

>>82853

No they're not. Most of the time they're fucking horrendously drawn with no sense of anatomical knowledge. You're an idiot.

>>82786

Cute tbh

>>82860

this tbh

also putting iconography on your character's body is 100% cringe

>>82860

Case in point: Aaron. His anatomy is atrocious yet he's popular because barafags have no standards.

>>82876

>Cubs have their own rating scale

Your system continues to baffle all who behold it.

>>82879

you do realize it's just anthony fagtano right

you really expect someone with a generic barafag fursona to be original?

>>82786

I'd lick those toes and tongue that cock :3

>>82894

I don't know. Is it MORE or LESS original to be anti-cub. I think we have about equal numbers of both sides around here and both vastly outnumbered by those who don't give a fuck either way.

>>82752

Loving the tiny cock <3 Would be better castrated though

>>82936

ok, this is actually well presented. Finally we have a decent oc posted in this thread other than my own. Ill give this a light 8 points off from being decent 8 because i see some signs of hybrid in there.

>>82936

not sure about your question, but I really like this guy you posted! he's a cutie

except for the person-hair on his head that is terrible and you should feel bad about it

>>82941

>>82942

Those are pretty much always the main two criticisms I hear, yeah.

I've tried to change his hair a few times, but making it a dark shade of his base fur color is the most I can do and still feel like I haven't made things worse by forcing it.

I had that criticism in mind from the start when I was coming up with >>82276 so it was easier to avoid.

The hybrid thing is more of a black and white issue though, you either hate 'em or you don't and the character is either hybrid or they're not.

If you reduce the hybridization down to almost nothing you might as well not even bother, so I don't try to fight it and let people take it as they will.

Also, I just realized I forgot the white on the inside of his hands in that last one. Fuck.

>>82924

Are you hyperfocused on this fetish, or are you attempting to be a troll?

>>82936

Lookin' awesome!

>>82924

>Would be better castrated though

His balls would just immediately grow back.

>>82946

I personally like hybrids.

Have you tried just not having the hair?

>>82941

>other than my own

sir, the donkey, the dragon and the bara bird were all good sonas, are you stupid?

>>82978

the hair looks good though???

>>82979

>generic muscular bird that has zero character and is literally just an egotistical projection of what the owner thinks of themselves

>good

I know furfags are renowned for their low standards but come on now

>>82148

Cabella.

>>82978

>Have you tried just not having the hair?

I'll sketch it a bit and see if I can make it work this time, but I'm not expecting much.

>>82148

cute

>>82154

handsome, I'd fuck it

>>82180

Looks totally retarded

>>82181

Dreadful

>>82193

4/10

>>82235

It's not bad but it's not good, rather dull

>>82357

Eyyy not bad, solid 7

>>82362

I like the character concept but you need to find better artists

>>82601

Very good

>>82786

8 first person in thread to go to non trash artists

>>82936

7 go to better artists tbh

>>82876

>le egyptian bird man

0 for creativity but 6 for going to non bargain bin artists so eh

>>83609

I am judging both and then creating a score based on that

>>83612

The art is a non-factor, it's not the commissioner's fault if the character looks more or less attractive depending on how the artist drew it in what way. When I rate characters I do so on a basis of appearence & bio.

>>83568

Thanks for liking my donkey!

>>83617

>art is a non factor

>I rate characters on the basis of appearance

you're a retard, sir. A good artist can take a mediocre concept and make it look incredible

a bad artist will take a fantastic concept and it'll look like shit.

It doesn't matter how good someone thinks their sona is, if all they have to show for it is shitty 5 dollar mspaint sketches then there's no way to see anything other than crap. Don't be a delusional retard.

>>83632

if people actually gave a shit about their character in any way other than appearances then they wouldn't spend money on art, retard. They'd write stories or physical descriptions and they'd be all set

People get art for a reason so don't be an apologist for the fuckwits who go for vanity over substance without even being able to afford it

>>83630

But this is a thread about fursonas, not art. A mere description about an interesting character is a better fursona than the product of a great artist who drew a beautiful render of Generic Fox #327546.

I understand if literally your only purpose here is to find cute characters to fap to, and don't give a shit about any factor other than how pretty the shading is on their dick. In which case, why don't you go rate whatever's on the front page of FA?

>>83649

He looks better without the "clothes".

Probably just needs some casual wear.

Is he based on any specific kind of bird or is he just "a bird"?

>>83650

The hell is he?

Think I see a fluffy neck and there are not enough of those.

>>83649

Why's his dick and tongue yellow? (i don't get this need for your internals to be the same color as the fur please someone explain it to me) Why no cloaca?

>>83655

What constitutes as a non-generic fox?

>>83653

art is pure vanity. There is a reason why there isn't an art market around people's dnd characters, it's because people care about substance instead of the cosmetic. Whereas furries are the complete opposite and prefer style over substance

>>83655

>this thread is about fursonas, not art!

>everyone in this thread is rating people's art posts

plz point me to the vibrant fursonas bio in this thread,.oh wait there isn't one because everyone's an art whore? Shocking

>>83649

9/10

>>83568

Dreadful why? What would you change?

>>83669

>Whereas furries are the complete opposite and prefer style over substance

Not going to argue there, but that doesn't support your previous argument at all.

Getting a picture made of a character isn't some surefire proof that the person doesn't care about the character's backstory or personality.

Art is often used to help portray a character's history and can do just as much to flesh them out as the written word.

>>83670

>plz point me to the vibrant fursonas bio in this thread

>>82222 >>82211 >>82306 and >>82371 are the only ones I can find.

Seems like people should either be asking about the characters they find interesting so more people have a reason to share, or everyone should be posting 'sonas/OCs with a bit of background right off the bat.

Either one would be an improvement.

>>83630

>fuck creativity, only the way it's presented matters

You're the highest degree of faggotry.

>>83658

>The hell is he?

I told the artist to try and combine characteristics from multiple animals, since he's supposed to be kind of aliens so he wouldn't be just like something found on earth. I said wolf, fox, and dragon was what I wanted to combine, but the later I changed dragon to deer.

>>83649

Your bird is so cute!

>>83658

I designed him as a generic songbird originally and went with colors I liked, which worked out to be an oriole. And the clothes are just the thot outfit I have for porn pics. Normal outfit wise is black denim/ hoodie

>>83668

I was originally gonna do fleshy pink but said fuck it. At least now I can make traffic cone dick jokes

>>83706

The reason is because i like to rp fights with my characters, so I wanted to increase the possible power level of him. He's not really an alien. I suppose the closest real comparison would be an deity, but not really. The backstory I went with is that he's a celestial being, born from the stars. I actually am requesting my commission artist to switch out the nub horns for more mature deer antlers instead, but they're supposed to look like jagged bits of crystal lodged in his head.

So yeah, the reason for the his backstory is not creativity, but because I want to give him powers and the ability to punch really really hard essentially.

>>83710

>the reason for the his backstory is not creativity, but because I want to give him powers and the ability to punch really really hard essentially.

Not gonna lie, wasn't expecting that.

Don't think that sounds as fun taken to the point of godhood myself, but that's just personal preference.

I may not like it, but I sure as hell can't say it's an objectively bad or lazy reasoning in that case.

>they're supposed to look like jagged bits of crystal lodged in his head.

That sounds pretty neat for a character like that, at least if the artist can pull it off well.

I think just coloring normal antlers a weird color would be pretty shit, but if they can get a fractured crystal branching out in the general shape of antlers it'd be pretty neat.

Maybe the crystal bits can quickly grow back or something too, so he can be "hit" without actually taking significant damage.

Y'know, be able to let the person you're RP'ing with actually connect with attacks or whatever more often so it feels a little more satisfying instead of having to dodge everything to avoid having a fight end too soon.

Could also explain why they look jagged, from having to regrow so often.

>>83712

Well the reason I'm making him basically a god, or a godling, is because the people I rp fights with basically have godly character themselves, so I have to try and find a reason to level the playing field, so to speak. He's supposed to be a young celestial, so he won't be as strong as an adult celestial. I like to have my character gain strength in the story as time goes buy or plot points happen. I'm basically engaged in a really long term DnD campaign. So far I've just used disposable canon characters from anime, cartoons, and video games; but I wanted my own actual character.

I really like the idea about the crystal horns shattering and reforming though. One of the things I told my artist that I would like to possibly have the horns not be symetrical to each other to see if that might add a little bit more character to him.

>>83729

My foxsona wasn't generic until the fandom told me to make it bland, so I made it bland.

I've seen at least 3 other characters looking exactly like him because he doesn't have any special trait anymore.

But I don't care, I love that guy.

>>83751

>theres like no way to make them work because theyve been done to death pic related

What the fuck does this shitty smug buff dude have to do with foxes? Hell, I'd go one step farther back and describe that as not even "generic fox" but "generic canine". You could call that a wolf and nobody would dispute it.

>>83729

>le generic fox poster trying to pretend his fagsona has depth

OH NO NO NO NO

>>83672

The core concept because it's shit

>>83795

Could you explain a bit more? What's shit about it? I've been critiqued on the fedora already, and I'm surprised nobody has said something about "trans-related character = garbage," which seems to be another pet belief.

>>83744

I've touched on that a bit earlier in this thread. To much of the fandom, there seems to be a strong desire to dislike things. This drives criticism that paints everything as being too generic or too specific, too ordinary to too unique, too bland or too intense. People start with the belief that everything is shitty, then divide everything into these two categories in order to support that belief that nothing falls into a sweet spot in the middle.

>>83794

I've written six short-stories about him or his universe, with several more in progress. He has more depth than every other character here, whether you care for the content or not.

>>83649

I would date you, you're pretty cute

>>83831

You'd date the fursona, sure, 90% of the time they're made to be idealized, but what if they're a fatass or a skeleton on the other end?

>>83827

So what you're saying is that it's impossible for any furry character to have depth. Because otherwise there is no point in saying that one doesn't. You don't know. You can't know. You're just being a memespouting asshole for no reason, possibly because depth gets in the way over your fapping over the pretty pictures.

>>83837

>it's impossible for any furry character to have depth. Because otherwise there is no point in saying that one doesn't

Fuckin' wat

Where the hell are you getting that from >>83827

They just said having a bunch of stories written about your character doesn't mean anything on its own.

They could easily be six short stories of six different booty calls that flesh out fuck all about the character except how big his dick is, they could all be too focused on world-building to actually spend any time going into your character, or they could actually make your character very well developed.

>I've written six short stories about him [and] his universe

Doesn't mean shit to anyone.

Quit being retarded.

>>83834

Ay, as long as they love me <3

>>83841

>People complaining that none of these characters has any depth

>Someone shows up who has a character who might have depth

>Everyone says he must be lying

>Depth doesn't mean shit to anyone

You're all just being contrarian motherfuckers at this point.

>>83860

>"having stories" is an insubstantial claim

That doesn't make any sense. It was literally being said that these characters were just pretty art and most didn't even have so much as a short bio paired with them. Unless you think those "stories" are nothing more than random letters splashed across a page like the result of a cat walking across a keyboard, it simply must have some substance. Maybe you have a very poor opinion of what a "story" is??

>>83865

>Maybe you have a very poor opinion of what a "story" is??

Can't have an opinion about a story if I have no idea what the content is.

Gonna share some of that deep lore with us or is it actually just shallow porn and you don't want to admit it?

>>83866

nobody would care about it if it wasnt shallow porn though, lmao you furries are all alike

>>83865

You're right, stories have substance, but what's also important is to have depth. As stated earlier, these stories might just be "six different booty calls" that show us little depth of character, or they could be more than that, but we don't know, and we still won't know anything until a story is posted.

>>83919

I would care about it, especially because it might not be shallow porn.

>>82894

The real Anthony Fantano? We have a /mu/ eceleb on here?

>>83943

>having low standards

>>82193

Looks more like a red panda. Have any other art?

>>83865

It's true, stories can have no depth at all and thus be insubstantial claims to a character having depth.

I even gave an example of stories without depth in a book series cleverly titled "The Land". The character hardly develops meaningfully, the author keeps propping him up to be a super good guy by having every other character say he's good when his actions speak otherwise (I.E: He only does actions for gain since there are never any negative drawbacks, ever.)

Since the genre of the books is LitRPG the author fills pages with made-up gaming text that rarely actually has any value or use to pad the book, which means more empty content in a story. It also allowed the author to bullshit an excuse in that the character can learn every skill imaginable. I could go on with how this character's actions have no meaning in development through the insane logic that the author introduced being "experience debt" but I would be here all week.

The author also throws in too many plot hooks for the character, seems to get bored with most of them mid way, and then abruptly shuts it down, conveniently forgets about it, or continuously delays it as with one instance, one of the plots from the first book didn't return until the fourth book and was tossed aside. And even then, this character never experiences a failure in any of these plots except one which ended up being a gain instead after some plot contrivance. In this example, the character's actions has no meaning because he doesn't actually grow from plots, they just exist, happen, and are done.

By these examples, and I could give many more, this character has no depth within their own story, a story that has 8 published books. So your argument for characters having depth based on stories can be easily disproven even if your character was published.

But that's not to say a character without depth is a bad character. There are plenty of characters who have very shallow depth but are still interesting and entertaining. Spongebob for example has no depth. He's a fry cook, he's overly excited, he likes jelly fishing, can't drive, and lives in a pineapple under the sea. That's an example of a character with barely any depth but still able to tell good stories.

What exactly are you giving us here? You keep thrusting character depth on everyone but you've yet to prove any of it besides "I've got written stories" but what is there? If we read these stories we could have judged them on their merits and maybe found the character interesting if they have very little depth, but you keep insisting on the character being highly in depth so that's all we'll be able to judge them on.

>>83967

The first most apparent remark I have is how exactly does he have a lizard snout with the appearance of scaled arms but.. fur on his head?

And if that's a Harry Potter scarf then please undo it.

>>83969

>fur on his head

It's not fur, it's kinda like the soft-ish frills on the back of an iguana.

I'm just working on limited artistic skill unfortunately.

**I have to admit it made me think of that too after I drew it, but it wasn't intentional.

I probably just need to come up with a different design for the scarf or make sure I never color it the same.**

>>83970

Frills are fine, but the way you drew them is definitely more fur accents.

Only remaining problem, then, is that we need to see his slit that hides his penis.

>>83972

It's okay, we can pretend that you didn't just do that. Let's try again? Show us that cloaca.

>>83974

All right, we can compromise. At least tell me about his boyfriend.

>>83974

If you don't prove he's a boy we'll just have to assume it's not.

>>83975

Well, he does have a bodyguard/packmule traveling companion that's nearly twice his height.

I've got basically zero work done on fleshing him out though, he doesn't even have a name yet.

Visually, all I've got is that he's probably going to have a musclegut-type build (more functional muscle from doing his job than actually trying to look good), he's significantly taller than Sawyer, and he's most likely going to be an alligator.

If you want to use your imagination, I can't stop you.

>>83992

>monkey

Gross

>shadowmancer

One of the coolest archetypes I've seen in a tabletop system.

Rarely see it pop up elsewhere though.

Screwing with shadows just sounds awesome, especially teleporting and melding type stuff.

This place needs a "redesign my fursona" thread.

>>84020

"Pimp my fursona"

>>84020

Think a general fursona/OC thread would be better, rather than one with a specific goal like this one.

It'd be silly to make a new thread just to have everyone repost their shit though.

Maybe just wait until this one dies and falls to the bottom of the trash heap like all the others or something.

>>84034

It could be put into the worldbuilding thread, if one of the criteria you have for a "good fursona" includes a backstory and world, instead of just "lol it's just like our world but with furries?".

>>84039

>includes a backstory and world, instead of just "lol it's just like our world but with furries?"

I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with "reality but with fur", you can still make an interesting character like that.

Plus, if it's including OCs and fursonas, then the worldbuilding would be out anyway since a 'sona isn't meant to have any kind of special backstory or setting tied to it.

It's literally just a visual design used to represent the owner.

So there could be some overlap, but I'm not sure they'd mesh perfectly.

>>83649

I always like seeing your bird pop up in my feed

>>84039

>includes a backstory and world, instead of just "lol it's just like our world but with furries?".

I don't understand this. Sure, it can be a sign of laziness, but at the same time you can do something that's distinct from our world but is still very lazily or poorly built as a world. It's not intrinsically bad writing, and it can serve the very specific purpose of having something very familiar to the reader, which can usefully be contrasted against the supernatural or alien residents of that world.

After all, the core of the sci-fi root for furries does lie in the question of how beastmen would handle sociopolitical issues differently being much more like animals in structure than us humans. In a way, we humans get a pretty easy out in that all of us humans are relatively similar - a world more like Zootopia where prey and predators are living together requires a lot more careful consideration (which Zootopia, mind, did not offer.)

>>84034

>>84020

>>84039

Kinda waiting on a decision about this

I want to make a follow-up post, but if I do I'd definitely be going outside the original topic of the thread into character building rather than just getting comments and feedback.

>>84054

>It's literally just a visual design used to represent the owner

Increasingly, the line between the two has blurred. Reason being: a pure fursona is already impossible to begin with. One cannot choose which species best represents themselves, because they are not that species; they are human, which is roughly equally distant from a fox or a lizard or a Pokemon. Most of the time it's pure fantasy, anyway, where their "fursona" doesn't look like them, doesn't act like them, has a cool and exciting job and different hobbies, etc.. They are a 30-something fat computer programmer who plays video games, but their fursona is a Greek God of a tiger who is 19 and an assassin who enjoys competitive sports. If it's like that, what's the difference whether you call it a fursona or an OC?

My definition for a "fursona" is merely what a person chooses to use as an avatar. It doesn't represent them, per se, it's just what people know them as. If it's an OC, it's at least their main OC.

>>84067

It's not that it's restrictive as that it's lazy. If you start with "our world but with furries" as a base, and then worldbuild from there, that's fine. It's what most everyone (including myself) are going to do because they don't want to dedicate years of work creating a Tolkien-esque world that will not net them any money or influence. Also, what you said about familiarity.

What I was talking about was when someone's description for the world their OC/fursona lives in is "our world but with furries" and NOTHING MORE. It makes it clear that their character is for nothing more than sexual roleplay or porn commissions, where the goal is to get off as quickly as possible, and faffing about with worldbuilding just gets in the way. It's shorthand to tell the other players or artists that any items or locations or references can be just whatever's in their own bedroom. Eliminates thought for speed and convenience.

>>84072

At this point it probably doesn't matter too much. This thread is basically dead as to people posting their characters, and the "rating" idea from the OP was stupid, anyway. Might as well just post here. A better question is: what do you expect to get? Because if it's honest critique and intelligent suggestions about how to improve a fursona, you'll get precious little, if at all.

>>84068

Not bad. You should get a sequel that goes full NTR

>>84072

I disagree with >>84073 about not going to the world building thread. This thread is about roasting fursonas, giving nonsense critique and stupid suggestions about how to improve a fursona. Making this into a character and world building thread is worse than adding character building to the world building thread. It could definitely use more life.

World-Building Thread

>>79834

>>84074

that's fucked up

>>84073

>Might as well just post here.

>>84091

>I disagree with >>84073 about not going to the world building thread.

Well now what.

>Because if it's honest critique and intelligent suggestions about how to improve a fursona, you'll get precious little, if at all.

I feel like real critique is hard enough to come by no matter what, but it might be easier to get here.

Most other furshit sites are overwhelming hugboxes that'd probably tell me that they love my mediocre art, how he's "super cuuuute!!! >w<", and that they want to hug him or something anyway.

Even if I don't manage to get actual criticism here, at least I could take any roasting as hints about what might be worth changing instead of getting literally nothing out of it but warm fuzzies.

>>84068

Completely predictable. I could tell what the entire story was going to be just from the TITLE and the premise as laid down in the first few lines. So going on and on and on with the protagonist(?)'s confidence that he was going to win, as if his loss was this big twist, was just a waste of time.

Worldbuilding was decent, if only something would have been done with those societal implications other than a quick fapfic.

>>84097

That's all fine and good if we're talking about art critique, not character critique. Even disregarding the whole "hugbox" thing, the former is a LOT easier than the latter. Most people can tell what is wrong with a piece of visual art, but most people lack the language to describe what is wrong about a character (which is fundamentally in the writing). For a crude example, most people can tell you that Marvel movies are good and DC movies are garbage (if you're into capeshit, anyway); but few of them could tell you WHY. They'd say that the "writing is bad" or the "characters aren't believable" or the "dialogue is wooden", but couldn't actually help you FIX it. They smell a rat, but can't point it out, so to speak.

What I am concerned about is that any "critique" on a character is just going to be people telling you what they like (or dislike), what they would have on their own characters, and all varieties of kinkshaming. Does anyone remember the shitshow in the old dragon thread a while back, with the arguments over external testicles or no, dick or cloaca, and MOTHER OF FUCKING CHRIST that one cuntlicker that kept going on ad nauseum about why dragons are supposed to have dog-like paws? That's what I mean. Few people here can help fix a bad character; they will only suggest what fetishes you should add to make it fappable (to them).

But by all means, give it a shot. Nothing to lose.

>>84102

>For a crude example, most people can tell you that Marvel movies are good and DC movies are garbage

Yeah, that's useless tripe that makes up a vast majority of comments and is why I think criticism isn't easy to come by.

>They'd say that the "writing is bad" or the "characters aren't believable" or the "dialogue is wooden", but couldn't actually help you FIX it.

I know, but comments like that are still way more helpful than "It's bad" and "I don't like it".

Not as good as actual, quality critique... but far from useless.

>What I am concerned about is that any "critique" on a character is just going to be people telling you what they like (or dislike), what they would have on their own characters, and all varieties of kinkshaming.

That's why you just don't immediately do whatever people suggest when it comes to crit about something subjective like a character or setting.

You want people to tell you those things so you can sort through their opinions and weigh it against what you think would ultimately be best.

Maybe you don't agree that the character should be brown, but you got an overwhelming number of people saying that it would look good.

All you can do is figure out how much you value your own opinion over pleasing theirs.

You can often get away with retaining details only you like and still manage to make people like your thing overall, so it's more of a balancing act than whoring your idea out to be changed by anyone willing to type out a comment.

This all goes out the window if you literally give zero fucks what anyone else thinks obviously, but I feel like modifying your ideas to impress others is part of being creative.

You can't stop kinkshaming though, just take it like a man instead of getting sad that someone on the internet doesn't want to fuck the same things as you.

>>84068

hot as fuck tbh famalam

>>84121

You can't just take a character from a video game and say that's your fursona. Point of a fursona is to create something original that represents you.

>>84121

>anthro Meowstic with a red coat

There anything more to him, or is he one of those purely visual design reps of the owner?

>>84167

I know the whole point of an persona OC is to interperate an original image of yourself, it's just that ive grown so attached to the design of meowstic that i guess it's become glued to me now. I vastly prefer it over a fully orignal design. Maybe my opinion on it will change over time but thanks for the insight.

>>84205

The ladder. The only special thing I can think of is the ability to holo-projects copies of himself. Really what I tried to do was tell personality through character design. Did it woek?

>>84254

>Really what I tried to do was tell personality through character design. Did it woek?

I'm not sure. Unfortunately, I just see an anthro Meowstic in a shirt. What aspects of his design are intended to suggest personality?

>>84254

>Really what I tried to do was tell personality through character design. Did it woek?

All I can see is a plain looking coat.

Maybe give him one of those novelty shirts with some kinda design on it?

Kinda hard to get much personality out of a single piece of clothing.

Could also style his hair weird or something?

I mean, you can definitely get some personality out of a design, but you'll never get an entire character out of it.

I guess that doesn't really matter though, it just needs to look cute and all the personality comes from it acting like you.

Not sure what's going on with the color changes in the bottom left image.

It's spelled latter

>>84259

Well, on the right I tried to convert character design the the shape theory in which the three primary shapes, circle, square and triangle, could give you a general feel of how the character is portrayed.

For example, I wanted to make the tuft and hair sharper, more rudged to symbolise a more "on edge, nervous" character. The stiff stance was kinda intended tbh as "boxy" looking characters are seen as hardy and strong. I'm still learning this stuff so probably didn't execute it like I wanted to, but I'm willing to improve.

>>84339

>A god that is actually an alien satellite that manipulates things on Earth by using a swarm of nanomachines in the atmosphere

This premise is a LOT more interesting that what you've used it for...

>>84386

>that's just normal stuff in numenera

That's why I said it didn't feel like much of a waste, he just took something pre-existing and inserted his fat dragon into it.

It was a waste of the setting, but at least it's still being used by others for less throwaway stories that aren't affected at all.

>>84375

why even make this post at all then?

>>84401

>Oh please, my shit isn't a waste of a setting, I just grabbed shit from different settings I like and combined them for my magical realm.

Oh, I thought you just made a porn character and put him in that Numenera setting wholesale.

>godlike alien satellite is trope that's been explored before

I know it's not 100% original, but it's definitely not used very often and it's a pretty interesting idea.

S'why it kinda sucks to see it used as part of a backstory for a character that just roams around fucking his husband and wife in space ruins.

I mean the idea sounds fairly hot, but trying to make a character with any substance out of porn seems counter-intuitive.

>sex driven settings have been a staple in hentai for god knows how long.

The fact that it's a sex driven setting is what kills it for me.

I don't have a problem with them getting laid, but making it the focus just ruins a character to me.

I think from what I've seen so far, the method I like the most is how Banished did it.

It introduced two gay bird characters, but all their sexual escapades are only relevant in completely separate comics being made on the side.

So you still get the characters and story, without having them cheapened by trying to make the smut relevant to the actual plot.

>>84445

well take the idea and make yourself a better one, ok here try this, there are multiple highly advanced A.I.'s scattered around the world from various civilizations that have upped and vanish, these A.I.'s are fighting for some reason and use humans as their tools, through manipulating the nanomachines they alter the humans and have tricked them into worshiping them as gods.

>>84453

>well take the idea and make yourself a better one

Why?

I'm not saying the idea is bad, just that it's a shame it's being used for porn.

>>84386

>that's just normal stuff in numenera

You mean it's not even an original idea? That guy just made a self-insert porn fanfiction?

Just when I thought my expectations of furry writing couldn't get any lower. I shouldn't even be surprised.

>>84530

No dude, I said it's like numenera and corruption of champions. What I took from numenera is the tech so advanced it looks like magic, nanomachines everywhere, and multiple extinct advanced societies. What I did was grab these, took it off earth, make all of the advanced societies aliens, and have the planet they live on be a layered with the ruins of these societies.

So in my setting the planets core is a massive computer that an entire race has uploaded their minds into, the layer above this was created by an alien race made of goo and had technology that lookes very brutalist and made of rock and crystal, the layer above that one was created by a race of robots and had tech that looks abstract and made of light and metal, the other three layers are unknown, and the last two layers where created by a two races of space elves with the one on the bottom being made when they were in peace time and the top layer being created when they had a civil war and destroyed themselves. Humans are a byproduct of these space elves devolving into a primitive state.

>Fox

>Hyena

>Husky

What is the superior choice here for a straight acting powerbottom?

>>84575

Yeen, no question.

>>84606

Originally he was a furry Time Lord character I RPed on Second Life with other Doctor Who nerds, and originally was a fox before he regenerated but eventually he evolved and changed into my current fursona.

That Time Lord version of him I consider a alternate version of him in a different universe.

>>84606

>species: horse

Instant bonus points if you pick a specific breed.

Maybe one with a similar fur pattern if you don't want to change anything.

Not saying anything else though, 'cause I hate horses and I can't really rate that without being biased.

>>84576

I guess yeens are kinda cool. I always kinda liked them.

I have a few ideas for his personality that could work, but I'm not sure what I can do for his appearance.

what the fuck is this shit?

Blue fur, an inbred dude with a vag, kike hair?

Consider suicide or at least get some fucking taste.

>>84615

Looking over coat colors for Horses I think the closest to his fur and mane and tail color would be either a some sort of bay or chestnut

>>84666

Met someone with an aardwolf sona once. Guy was a real piece of scum And Brazilian so hand in hand with that

Didn't even have the mane. I'd say that animal needs a redemption of a good sona

>>84611

Autism has nothing to do with being woefully uncreative and stupid.

>>84666

It's an interesting animal, but visually people are just going to think you're a punk hyena. I'm curious as to your reasoning for picking that, though. Do you eat insects, or just smell very strongly?

>>84606

>He's sort of a idealized version of myself

Doesn't that just go without saying for ALL fursonas?

>>84710

No but I'm a bug chaser :^)

>>84763

Not sure what's up with the colors on the extremities, but the halloween theming is nice.

Any excuse to pair orange and black is a good one.

Not a fan of femboys, but bats have always been a species I think should show up more.

The red on the wings needs to go though, maybe add a bit of fuzz to the base.

>>84763

It's way too kemonomimi for my tastes, but still cute.

>>84766

Nobody asked YOU.

>>84788

I dunno either, I think it's just the shading to make him look spookier

Thanks for the critique

>>84801

That's what drew me to him in the first place actually haha

>>84763

>that big ass head

Got anything that isn't a caricature?

>>84801

He asked if I like bugs

>>84817

Hot, snowball a poz load with me

>>86517

Well, he's cute so draw some more.

>>86599

Back-wings are okay so long as there is some suggestion of anatomy so they might actually work. Not like this when they're attached by a tiny stick that magically goes through shirts. As a rule, I tend to have a sour opinion of any furry anatomy that is an "accessory" rather than functional.

>>86628

>neon blue nose and fur

>purple eyes

What's the white stuff coming out of his mouth at the bottom?

Or did you just "erase" with white instead of an actual eraser?

>>86639

My desktop died, illustrator is bugging on my old note 4 and I had to use white.

bara was a mistake

>>91695

She's cute.

a dumb generic character that is trying to hard and using neon colors as the main selling point.

>>91749

>seven on an autist's scribble

Clearly thirsty and trying to get into their pants

>>91749

>le bird faece

>>91766

>91766

not really its just cute and doesnt have tons of dumb flaws

>>91749

>filename

wew, stroking that ego there, little guy?

>>91780

nah its a meme between me and a friend who drew that for me tbh

>>91879

so im going to go why i rate things more and lets start with your horse: it has only a few unique identifying features (the tattoos) the color contrast of the grey and white is poor and doesnt lend itself to a thought out design and the body type is extremely generic and samey, you have a sort of beard thing going on that closeup which imo is dumb because furries already have fur whats with adding human facial hair on top of it and the overall silhouette is just boring. Im struggling to find a positive for your oc but i will say i think that there is clearly an attempt for a better oc here, youre trying to branch out with markings but the way in which you did it just doesnt really give a good edge to it. Experiment with it a little more and give it some fire or personality of its own- let the oc be something more personal rather than a fuck profile. Overall im feeling a light to decent 3 on this one.

>>91879

Let me suck your horse cock

>>91880

>Body type is generic and samey

This isn't a valid criticism. That's not how you criticise an artistic piece, if you were to ever criticise the statue of David and say "ah well his physique is boring and generic :/" people would (rightly) laugh you right out of the country.

The only thing that matters is a coherent and aesthetically consistent and pleasing design. Making something different just for the sake of it does not make an idea or image good.

For example, take your bara bird. The little eye of Horus thing you decided to do is fine. It's also as you would put it "extremely generic" so generic in fact that it's a type of imagery thsto been used a thousand times for thousands of years. Does that make it bad? Not at all, it actually looks quite pleasing with the colors you've chosen for your bird's feather design.

On the other hand, the piercings don't fit at all on your character and fail to highlight your bird's design in a positive faction, they're a eye sore and look out of place.

Then there's the body type, it's different, it's unique. It also looks atrocious on an avian. Had you chosen a bear or a raccoon or something it would look fine but on any type of avian the whole comedically obese look is absolutely ridiculous.

What's more is you clearly recognize this as a fact

at least on some level since it appears most of your art actually has your bird with a much thinner (and better looking) body type.

Your attempt at being unique has led to your character looking worse than before.

And frankly, your choice to make him fat is no different than the furries who make their characters look ridiculous and eye catching through using neon color patterns. It's certainly different but it's definitely not good.

>>91916

Do ya happen to have an FA or anything?

>>91918

Found him: https://www.furaffinity.net/user/ottovonzelenyy/

>>83649

>>82786

>>82510

>>82362

>>82357

You guys also post your fa/telegram/discord/whatever

You're all qt uwu

While we're on the subject could....

>>82154

>>91921

Weird how the post got reversed like that

>>91919

>>91918

I made a new account x) I use that one as a art dump now

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/fatherhoss

>>91921

feypanda on furaffinity

>>91927

I'd tonguefuck your bird's asshole tbqh

>>92024

>Egypt aesthetic

>literally just a drawing of a head

Goddamn you are retarded, your opinions don't matter

>>92025

There's more than one picture of him in the thread my dude

>>82876

Big bara bird. Definitely bf material.

>>92040

Yuck, stop posting literal garbage

>>92070

rude

>>92082

Throw those characters in the trash and start over

>>92084

>pit licking

good taste

>>91906

musclechub on a bird is god tier

hit or miss i guess they never miss huh 😈

u gon skrrt and hit the dab like wiz cloaca 👏

>>91921

@acedthebased on twitter please, no i dont rp and no i dont get horny with people who arent my significant other🤠

>>84375

just dont be one of those racists and ur good ik tons of big name artists who post/posted here

>>92024

birds are highkey the superior furry species so i cant pass up the opportunity to rate one, ik the bluejay community has like this thing where they all want to look extremely similar but different from certain unique markings so i thought for a while staring at ur oc it was just my friend grim but ill say this, bluejays tend to play it safe. you know the species is decent and the designs iconic but the trapping kind of comes if you want to be standout- as a bluejay its very hard to be and this is a good and bad thing; the big pro being that all bluejay art is ur art the bad thing being a lot of extremely similar characters. still, its decent so decent 7 coming out on this one.

>>92090

i like the body type but im not a big fan of slits and i feel like something else can be done to the face to make it stand out more and give it a bit more oomph so ill go with light 6

>>92093

>this entire post

>>92093

>Literally some brainless nigger

To the shock of no one

>>92098

pretty sure aced is from switzerland or somth from the discord hes posted pics is white as fuck, still realy annoying liberal faggot tho

>>92084

Brainless idiot

>>92085

Real hot when you lick deodorant-covered pits and swallow that whale blubber

>>92126

Anon, you seem awful upset. Do you have a personal history with this dragon?

>spending money on porn

Oof, cringe, yikes

>>82137

This is just more proof that faggots ruin everything.

>>92090

Stupid faggots fuck everything up. It's like you WANT to fuck everything up, like you're some weird, pathetic incarnation of the spirit of Charlie Manson.