>>30032
>>30033
>>30034
What you say actually makes sense. Not that I've had any experience with her, sadly. It just all fits together that there would be two incarnations of Ebola-chan. From the sounds of it, Alpha is the "reproductive" side, while Omega is the "destructive". They're both her, both a loving goddess. But she is still a lethal virus, something that might be hard to square away with that.
Alpha is simple enough; a friendly but clearly aggressive lover. She wants to reproduce, to multiply. For viruses, that involves subverting a cell's defences and injecting it's own reproductive codes. But for humans, it is the act of sex. She could easily be some sort of masculine incubus rapist, but instead we have more of a succubus figure here.
Omega, however, is an interesting case. It's funny that you describe her love as almost motherly: we carry some of her DNA in us. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/virus-genes-human-genome/
Beyond that, she clearly shows restraint, and awareness of her nature. She brings painful death to the infected, but she does not wish to harm you. She could indeed be guarding you, leveraging that aspect against other entities. The use of the imagery of the infected is an interesting one here. The bleeding from her orifaces. Maybe it's supposed to intimidate?
I don't know if she's always had this division, or if we did it. Same with her exact form, or her loving nature. Our showering her with affection and adoration might have changed her. Is she keeping her Omega aspect present but distant, thus that her Alpha may love you? Is either one more representative of what she is or was? It's hard to say.