I took a look at the Talmud page from RationalWiki: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talmud
It's full of pilpul and claims about how it is unjustly used by anti-semites. Here's an example:
>When challenged on their use of Talmud quotes, antisemites often object that they're being subjected to the Courtier's Reply. Why, they ask, are they not qualified to criticize the Talmud when the Tanakh and Torah are fair game?
>…
>Likewise, unlike the Tanakh, the Talmud is simply too complex and technical of a text for an untrained person to understand.
Just look at the cocks list! Out of the three chapters, two are about antisemitism. The last is about "controversial" passages.
> 1 Antisemitism
> 2 Examples of Controversial passages
> 3 The Courtier's Reply and the Talmud
> 4 External links
> 5 References
>>435160
I should mention: Their page about "Homophobia" is hilarious. Homosexuality is one of those topics where leftist can't see the possibility of their opponents having any valid arguments what so ever or even the slightest shred of humanity.
Instead of listing "arguments against homosexuality" or something like that, they have listed "rationalizations":
>1 Rationalizations of homophobia
> 1.1 "It's not natural"
> 1.2 "It's a perversion"
> 1.3 "It's against God's law"
> 1.4 "It's disgusting"
> 1.5 "It allows corruption, or sexual abuse, in single-sex communities"
> 1.6 "Marriage has a traditional, ancient definition"
> 1.7 "Homosexuality might encourage other perversions"
> 1.8 "Homosexuals choose to be that way"
> 1.9 Sexually transmitted infections
> 1.10 "Homosexuals are promiscuous"
> 1.11 Anal sex
> 1.12 "Homosexuality is not reproductive"
> 1.13 "Homosexuals don't even exist, anyway."
In other words,
>"We're objectively right, Goy, and here are the irrational claims people pretend to believe just to disagree with us."
But, I hear you ask, why would those filthy Goyem do such a thing? Fret not, RationalWiki has you covered. Here is why they actually pretend to not realise the Truth:
>2 Roots of homophobia
> 2.1 Repressed homosexuality
> 2.2 Overcompensation