e84be6 No.6463
Is there any denomination more based than the new IFB?
FAITH ALONE FOR SALVATION
ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED
KING JAMES BIBLE ONLY
TRINITY
SOUL-WINNING
HARD PREACHING
ANTI-WORLDLINESS
ANTI-CALVINISM
ANTI-DISPENSATIONAL
ANTI-ZIONISM
POST-TRIB PRE-WRATH RAPTURE
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
de402e No.6466
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
4450a1 No.6471
>>6463
>Is there any denomination more based than the new IFB?
Puritanism
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
815314 No.6473
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
ca9ee1 No.6478
Pastor Anderson is way more masculine, Scriptural, and to the point, than Archbishop Fulton Sheen was
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2783a1 No.6482
>>6463
>based
>only uses a kike translation
>loves kikes
>loves race mixing
>promotes constant sinning
Certainly an appropriate group for someone who speaks in niggerese anyways.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
815314 No.6483
>>6482
>KJV
>kike translation
boogeyman hunting
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2783a1 No.6499
>>6483
>lead us not into temptation
>implying the Lord leads us into temptation
The literal translation is "And be driven inward we not into temptation". Praying to God that he not LEAD YOU INTO TEMPTATION is sacrilege.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
815314 No.6500
>>6499
Is that the base of your claim that the KJV is a "kike translation"? You don't prefer the rendering of that sentence? reaching.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
47fbbf No.6506
If it doesn't use Luther 1912 it's cryptopapist
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
4450a1 No.6524
>>6499
Pope Frank go away come back another day
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2783a1 No.6528
>>6500
>calling the Lord satan is fine because I like how it sounds
Let me guess, you also think it is fine to refer to Judeans as "Jews", in every single place except where they kill Christ, then they are Judeans again. Nope, totally not yidded.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
ab95ac No.6533
>>6528
1- the KJV's rendering doesn't necessarily imply that God leads one into temptation
2- even if it did, you haven't established a reason we should believe they were intentionally misleading the reader
3-even if it did and you had, you haven't made any connection to undue Jewish influence in the translation, which would require you bring to our attention more than one piece of evidence
4- you're accusing me of an entirely unrelated mistake just to find something to be outraged about
You need to calm down. I'm suspicious that you're the actual yid here the way you just want to incite discontent with no purpose.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
81f772 No.6562
>no new IFB church near me for at least a hundred miles
What do
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7ff12c No.6564
>>6499
If it were not God's permissive will that we be tempted at times, we would not be tempted.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
73422b No.6574
>>6562
Where's the problem?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
2783a1 No.6599
>>6533
>the KJV's rendering doesn't necessarily imply that God leads one into temptation
No it does not imply that, it directly states it.
>you're accusing me of an entirely unrelated mistake just to find something to be outraged about
"Mistake". Oops, we just accidentally called Judeans jews everywhere except where jews don't want us to!
>>6564
That you can be tempted does not mean it is the Lord tempting you. He gave you free will, but he does not lead you to sin.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
81f772 No.6602
>>6574
Id like to join one for starters.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
73422b No.6608
>>6602
You ought to not. There are thousands of better Baptist churches
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
99b8e4 No.7184
>>6463
A lot of their doctrines are easily shown false (KJVO, homos unable to repent, OSAS, no need to repent from sin). NIFB followers tend to be coldhearted in my experience as well, and not conducive to reasoning (extreme "follow the leader" syndrome).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
f7bb2b No.8142
>>7184
You been to a new IFB church.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
9b4cd2 No.8143
>>6473
May I ask what the difference is? I'm not familiar with either
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
6ff2d4 No.8147
>>8143
Traditionalist here means that which Baptists have traditionally believed and practiced. It's not a denomination like "New IFB" is.
A traditional Baptist Church has congregational singing from the hymnal, accompanied with a piano, an organ, or an orchestra.
We are not charismatic.
The preaching is expository.
Traditional is typically unassociated with calvinism, but there have been calvinist Baptist churches at all times in baptist history.
IFB is a 20th century occurrence (see fundamentalist-modernist controversy).
New IFB is Steven Anderson's movement of the last couple years.
The other large category is a "contemporary" Baptist Church. Think stage seating and a whiny soft rock concert, then a Ted talk. The theology can be sound but the presentation is novel.
Look up "seeker sensitive" movement.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
3d4206 No.8148
>>8147
>A traditional Baptist Church has congregational singing from the hymnal, accompanied with a piano, an organ, or an orchestra.
>We are not charismatic.
>The preaching is expository.
Sounds like the NIFB churches
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
47773e No.8153
>>6463
Old IFB churches are infamous for either being cultic leaning, or being outright cults; complete with sexual and physical abuse scandals, as well as being hyper legalistic and controlling, in a manner akin to Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses, along with a shallow, rack up the numbers of "saved" people, via the "tract-Roman's Road-sinner's prayer" form of "evangelizing."
The New IFB is just the old IFB on steroids..
>>8147
Trying to find a traditionalist Baptist church in my area has proven to be infuriating. There's a couple of IFB churches that I'm not going to go to for the aforementioned reasons. All the Southern Baptist Convention churches in my area, within reasonable driving distance, either have a female functioning as a pastor or reverend in some capacity, and/or are a rock concert seeker sensitive church.
The closest to traditionalist Baptist I can find are some of the Free Will Baptist churches around here, and even some of them have some contemporary worship elements in spite of being in traditional old fashioned style church buildings, but it looks like one of them will have to do.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
73422b No.8157
>>8153
There is not a female functioning pastor at any SBC church, it is explicitly prohibited in the BFM, our statement of faith.
Most traditional baptist churches are SBC, because most baptist churches are SBC.
I'll bet "First baptist (your town)" a traditional service, even if they also have a contemporary service.
>>8148
New IFB has topical preaching
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
47773e No.8166
>>8157
>There is not a female functioning pastor at any SBC church, it is explicitly prohibited in the BFM, our statement of faith.
Lead Pastor? No. Working with youth or the elderly, and having been ordained as a Pastor, Reverend or Minister? Yes:
https://oakmontchurch.com/about-oakmont/staff
http://fbcfarmvillenc.org/category/staff/
http://tmbc.org/about-us/staff/
The following particular church used to post sermon videos regularly. The very last sermon video that was posted, was a sermon given by a female. There have been no further video uploads since. Probably because it was the last straw for that dying congregation:
https://wintervillebaptist.org/sermons/
And that's just the churches within driving distance of me. It's also creeping in elsewhere in the SBC:
https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/02/17/southern-baptist-megachurch-ordains-female-pastor/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
73422b No.8172
>>8166
Women can be called ministers as long as the role doesn't entail pastoral ministry. Same with reverend.
This is a surprise to me. Those churches with women preaching and called pastor should be removed from membership with the SBC. This year's convention included some kind of resolution to pursue removal of member churches.
Ordination is purely ceremonial. Spurgeon called it a fragment of popery.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
73422b No.8174
>>8172
>>8166
actually I'm not sure how I feel about "reverend" for women, Ithink it's essentially associated with "pastor". It's mostly a black title in my experience.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
