[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/christianity/ - Christian Theology & Philosophy

If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. - 1 Peter 4:14
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


| Rules | Meta | Log | The Gospel |

File: 69999586243fb59⋯.jpg (30.65 KB,485x340,97:68,peacecross1.jpg)

54ff31 No.1576

>The Supreme Court is diving into a debate about the place of religious symbols in public life in a case about a cross-shaped war memorial in Maryland.

>The case the high court is hearing Wednesday involves a 40-foot-tall, concrete cross on a large, grassy highway median in Maryland, just outside Washington. The nearly 100-year-old cross was built as a memorial to area residents who died in World War I.

>The District of Columbia-based American Humanist Association say the cross should be moved to private property or modified into a nonreligious monument such as a slab or obelisk. The group lost the first round in court, but in 2017 an appeals court ruled the cross unconstitutional.

>Defending the cross at the high court are The American Legion, which raised money for the cross and completed it in 1925, and Maryland officials, who took over maintenance of the cross nearly 60 years ago to preserve it and address traffic safety concerns. Maryland officials argue that the cross doesn’t violate the Constitution because it has a secular purpose and meaning.

https://archive.fo/MpT2h

The obvious answer is that the cross represents Christianity, but this is no issue with the establishment clause of the First Amendment

<Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

This is set up to be a win for conservatives that sets precedent for more ambiguous cases

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c94c5d No.1578

What a waste of time and resources. Privatize everything and you never have these debates.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c855e8 No.1579

File: 562c71d1173d9c9⋯.png (286.99 KB,680x544,5:4,b2c.png)

>>1578

Based and yellowpilled

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54ff31 No.1580

File: c108ca4a9745646⋯.jpg (312.73 KB,1200x1800,2:3,HansHermannHoppe_wn.jpg)

>>1578

>>1579

Baptist hoppean covenant society when

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

76f261 No.1581

>>1576

>This is set up to be a win for conservatives that sets precedent for more ambiguous cases

That would require that the state of Maryland were not arguing it is a merely secular symbol, and that the modern supreme court was not a virulently anti-Christian institution intent on exalting sin and destroying righteousness in the United States.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d1ab81 No.1585

File: 22299baf0c36ea0⋯.png (387.04 KB,319x568,319:568,176543234.png)

>>1576

>the cross

>has a secular purpose and meaning

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

526bc4 No.1588

>>1585

That meaning is capital punishment, almost always applied to intimidate the general public into self-censoring their dissent against foul rulers. Places that lacked western contact used the cross to make gruesome public displays against people who challenged the manmade order.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54ff31 No.1592

Relevant detail: the cross is on public land, but wasn't when constructed

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80b4c0 No.3919

The cross is clearly constitutional. The only clause in the constitution being argued, to my knowledge, is the 1st amendment.

<Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion

Since congress did not make a law in order to make the monument, it is constitutional. But precedent dictates that the 1st amendment is incorporated to the states. However, Maryland did not make a law in order to make the monument; it was constructed by The American Legion.

None of that matters anyway though, given that the construction of a monument is not an establishment of religion.

>>1576

>This is set up to be a win for conservatives that sets precedent for more ambiguous cases

It probably won't. The holding will likely favor conservatives so long as Roberts doesn't decide to make the court look "unpoliticized" by intentionally voting incorrectly. However, the opinion is likely be on extremely narrow grounds, as only Thomas is willing to upend bad precedent and re-establish constitutional law. Expect an outcome similar to Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018), wherein the court found the correct holding while limiting the opinion only to the adjudication at hand.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ebbbe2 No.3926

The flag next to it is clearly promotion of religion.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

00292b No.7023

UPDATE: SCOTUS passed it's ruling on Thursday

<7-2 in favor of American Legion

Summary:

>The Supreme Court issued its ruling on June 20, 2019. In a complex decision with many additional opinions, the Court ruled 7-2 to reverse and remand the Fourth Circuit's decision and allowing the Cross to stand. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the plurality decision, stated that "The cross is undoubtedly a Christian symbol, but that fact should not blind us to everything else that the Bladensburg Cross has come to represent", and that "destroying or defacing the Cross that has stood undisturbed for nearly a century would not be neutral and would not further the ideals of respect and tolerance embodied in the First Amendment". Alito was joined by Roberts, Breyer, Kagan, and Kavanaugh. Thomas and Gorsuch wrote separate opinions that joined Alito's judgement.

Wikipedia

Al Mohler talked about it today, listen here:

https://albertmohler.com/2019/06/24/briefing-6-24-19

Key takeaways:

>1971 "Lemon Test" for determining violations of establishment clause effectively ended, it was too subjective

>4 arguments in majority opinion:

>1: Historically untenable to retroactively determine that the placement of the cross had motives for establishment of religion

>2: Over time the purposes that are associated with an established monument symbol or practice often multiply

>3: Monuments take on secular symbolism in addition to Christian symbolism (which we affirm the cross is, Christian)

>4: It would be wrong for government to force the taking down of these monuments after so much time.

The hunched jew-corpse woman argued in her dissenting opinion that the presence of the Christian symbol was a harm to secularists. The majority dismissed this.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9f6151 No.7056

Daily reminder that the Jews packing the ranks of the secularists won't stop pushing this nonsense until we have nothing left of our civil traditions.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e81300 No.7058

>>7023

Praise God.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

26923d No.12477

>>1576

Nope, it's just a promotion of Roman torture method.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]