[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/christianity/ - Christian Theology & Philosophy

If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. - 1 Peter 4:14
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


| Rules | Meta | Log | The Gospel |

File: 6d129d9323df33f⋯.png (405.3 KB,1024x768,4:3,scr.png)

9dd1de No.12376

duh

https://archive.ph/dZ5cO

>Bishops have issued pastoral guidance in response to the recent introduction to mixed-sex civil partnerships, which says: “For Christians, marriage – that is, the lifelong union between a man and a woman, contracted with the making of vows – remains the proper context for sexual activity.”

>The church “seeks to uphold that standard” in its approach to civil partnerships, and “to affirm the value of committed, sexually abstinent friendships” within such partnerships.

>It adds: “Sexual relationships outside heterosexual marriage are regarded as falling short of God’s purpose for human beings.”

>The Civil Partnership Act came into force in December 2005, allowing same-sex couples to acquire a legal status and rights in relation to property, inheritance and tax entitlement. In 2013, same sex marriage was legalised.

>The C of E does not permit same-sex marriage. It allows clergy to be in same-sex civil partnerships as long as they are sexually abstinent.

Surprising to see a sane voice in leadership of the C of E, but there's no turning that sinking ship around as a church

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0d4842 No.12379

The CofE seems to realise cucking isn't getting them anywhere so the high church is beginning to make noises.

There was a pretty based Anglican reverend on Radio 4's Thought for the Day a couple of mornings ago (it's normally a pozzed segment) who just spoke about the true presence in the eucharist. It was refreshing to hear something that wasn't subversive trash for once.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1ac757 No.12380

I read about this earlier today. There were a lot of people screeching about how "the Church is backwards" and whatnot. I'm not too familiar with the Church of England, but I'm glad to see at least some semblance of sanity, even if it is just stating common knowledge.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ecb2ff No.12381

>>12376

Based.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

985cbc No.12383

>>12376

Fairly pointless statement. I mean they are correct and I do agree with them but effectively nobody follows this anymore. Marriage is a deathtrap for men and with the odds you have of finding an actual virgin woman, you may as well just play slots at a casino.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7dd488 No.12384

>>12383

I pity your cultural sifuafiony

It was scandal in my suburban Christian US birthplace for a girl to have fornicated. My wife was virgin when we married.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7dd488 No.12385

>>12384

lol situation*

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

985cbc No.12386

>>12384

A lot of these so-called "traditional" women that claim to be virgin still aren't that traditional or virginal in the slightest. They're fine with anal sex, oral sex, giving out handjobs like candy and taking nudes of themselves, and just staying a technical virgin to fool whatever naive rube ends marrying them. Assuming you somehow found an actual virgin that didn't take part in any of that, then congratulations on your extreme luck. I genuinely hope for your sake that she's the real deal and never divorces you, because if she does you're f—ed. If you live in a Western country there is a giant sword hanging above your head for the rest of your life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damocles#Sword_of_Damocles

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7dd488 No.12387

>>12386

Do you have any stats to back up your MGTOW talking points?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

985cbc No.12388

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7dd488 No.12389

>>12388

This is a report about STDs, not virginity

You're making assertions. You substantiate them.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

985cbc No.12390

>>12389

Use a bit of deductive reasoning. If women were even a tenth as virginal as you probably imagine them to be, STDs would be at an all-time low. Yet we see the exact opposite, not only does their rate keep increasing but antibiotics are now starting to become useless against them.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/marriage-divorce.htm

Current divorce rate sits at about 42%. Keep in mind this doesn't include unhappy/one-sided marriages that are only maintained out of convenience/fear.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7dd488 No.12393

File: 4fe6420c230d84c⋯.jpg (697.4 KB,1439x1787,1439:1787,Screenshot_20200123-154003….jpg)

>>12390

The datasets you are presenting do not support your demoralization campaign assertions

>Relative STD rates would be low if women were virginal in any significant degree

What?

>Divorce rate is a relevant indicator of adolescent virginity among women

What?

Come back with the proofs. I know why you're not, it's because they don't support your thesis.

I can't think of anything more Jewish trying to convince Christian white men to give up on white women. Leave this place.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

985cbc No.12394

File: 20dc506f0a4c0b8⋯.jpg (38.8 KB,805x606,805:606,washington-post-its-all-yo….JPG)

File: 20dc506f0a4c0b8⋯.jpg (38.8 KB,805x606,805:606,washington-post-its-all-yo….JPG)

>>12393

I'm aware of the supposed rise in sexual abstinence. It is almost certainly being driven by males only, if pic related is any indication (nearly 1/3 young males being incel or borderline incel). Remember that men tend to exaggerate their sexual lives while women tend to downplay theirs, so these numbers are probably even more skewed than we think.

>Relative STD rates would be low if women were virginal in any significant degree

Yes. Virginity almost guarantees zero STDs. If women were chaste to any significant degree, why do we keep seeing increasing rates of sexually-transmitted infections? Quite a few males are sexless so it isn't them mainly driving this.

>Divorce rate is a relevant indicator of adolescent virginity among women

Yes. 0 sexual partners at marriage ensures a very, very low chance of divorce. Ergo high virginity in women, low divorce rate. Yet it's at 42%, saying nothing of failed unhappy marriages.

>Come back with the proofs.

I just did. You replied with "What?" to both.

>I can't think of anything more Jewish trying to convince Christian white men to give up on white women. Leave this place.

Already resorted to this I see. I don't care much for Jews or whether or not white people specifically are reproducing, you're the first to even bring that up. All I care about is the fact that marriage is an awful deal for men, regardless of race. I could just as easily accuse you of being a Jewish divorce lawyer who wants men to keep being trapped into marriage so you can profit off of their misery in divorce court, but I don't believe you are. I think you're just heavily misguided and yet another victim of "women are wonderful" effect.

Anyway I don't have the energy for multiple-paragraph arguments nowadays, figure it out your own way. I truly wish you the best and I hope your wife/marriage is the exception, not the rule. Infighting between 2 fellow Christians should be kept to a minimum so God bless.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7dd488 No.12395

File: cd3991fe548c706⋯.jpg (124.29 KB,570x804,95:134,D38F1EBF-AA1C-452B-9DD4-CA….jpg)

>>12394

You're moving the goalposts from "the odds of finding a virgin are analogous to the lottery, so men should just give up" to "most women fornicate", which has yet to be proven

No, STD rates and divorce do not serve as effective stand ins for virgin rates. STDs are heavily affected by high promiscuity of repeat fornicators, and lying about virginity is not the majority (is it even significant?) cause of divorce in the US. The rate is also influenced by repeat divorcees.

It is very telling that you went to these stats first when you had familiarity with studies that look directly at the topic at hand.

>Already resorted to this I see

If it quacks, I'm calling it a duck

I am not arguing that women are without fornication, or that it's better than it used to be, or even that a majority of Christian young women are virgin. I am calling BS on your demoralization campaign. It is very realistic to find virgin women of your own race among the more observant Christian populations.

Also, marriage is not a death trap. It is the created order by God for man to normatively pursue. MGTOW is dysgenic and has literal homosexual sources as a movement.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5cfa1e No.12430

>>12376

The CoE has been under a ton of pressure from African bishops.

Same with the Roman church.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3b6328 No.12473

Why should anyone with an actual spine and working brain give AF what the Church of England thinks about _anything_?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]