I think he has slipped up and should've said "islam" and "muslims".
Instead of "Christians" and some denominations.
This guy talking at 1 minute about how "baptism is all about a symbolic ritual murder of the non jewish, of the gentile, to murder the gentile child, this was about to replace the "pagan" soul".
So, just to let you know, baptism is a ritual where you are being buried with Jesus Christ, when being submerged, and subsequently rising out of death, in Jesus Christ.
So death is a ritual symbol of baptism, murder however it is not. The death of the old man, the sinful man, the one who is dead.
Secondly, baptism is extracted from a cleansing ritual, not a murder ritual of the non-jew, i would not deny that there are insane people who have turned it into a murder ritual, for this makes sense looking at the state of this sin ridden world. We can read about other insane things the Israelites did when they left God and worshipped other false gods.
Sacrificing babies is one of them, the regular understanding would be they did this through the fire of molech.
I have no knowledge on people using water to "murder" someone.
Baptism existed before the conceptualization of the word "pagan".
So, it could not be about the replacement of the pagan soul.
However we do know as fallen humans we live in a state of death and corruption.
Accepting Jesus Christ as ones Lord and Savior results in the Holy Spirit dwelling within you.
It seems to me, you previously had only a body and a soul then, yet lacked a spirit, if anything does get destroyed however it can only be the spirit of the anti-christ.
And just listening to 2 mins of this guy blabbering and his incessant hatred towards Christianity he emanates, makes me understand why he is clearly unhappy with people loosing the anti-christ spirit, so ofcourse he has to speak out against it.
If he does not repent he will end up in hell and all i know is that people do not like to end up in hell.
lastly, this man talks about the "scandinavian religion", thor, freya, and i assume he is referring to the whole pantheon of the nordic gods.
As if his ancestors are free from disrespecting other worldviews.
Many tribes in scandinavian countries had different views and holy sites, who were likely happily destroyed or changed by other conquering tribes, to use an argument that a church has been build by a group of (likely nordic) people on a piece of so called holy land for some speculative practices performed every year, as a reason to then go out and "disrespect" (whatever this may mean) people adhering to this group, probably born many decades (when was that church build) after this Church was erected.
Maybe the town where this ritual site was present wholly converted to Christianity and they just wanted to get rid of that place.
And probably some did not like it.
I do not believe Jesus teaches us to practice Christianity through desecrating other sites.
However if i was not a Christian, and own a place/site of pagan worship, then become a Christian, i am free to do with this "place of worship" as i please.
So who "owned the ground the Church was build on?"
Weak arguments made by someone who is only looking for half truth or no truth arguments to fuel his anger towards a group which decides to live by Jesus Christ His standards, His teachings.