[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


| Rules | Log | Tor | Bunker |

File: 4079ae506599817⋯.jpg (14.83 KB,480x360,4:3,hqdefault.jpg)

793a68 No.855455

Thoughts on Jung and Jungian psychoanalysis?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1694e2 No.855530

His Aion book is very difficult. But the parallel that Jung draws between Christ and Buddha is interesting.

Christ too - like the Buddha - is an incarnation of the self, but in a very different sense. Both dominated the world in themselves: the Buddha, it could be said, through a rational understanding; the Christ, becoming a victim according to destiny; in Christianity, the main thing is to suffer, while in Buddhism the most important thing is to contemplate and do. Both are just, but in the Hindu sense the most complete man is the Buddha. He is a historical personality and, therefore, more understandable to man. Christ is, at the same time, a historical man and God, and therefore more difficult to access. Deep down, he knew only that he had to sacrifice himself, just as he had been forced from the bottom of his being. His sacrifice happened to him just as an act of fate. Buddha acted out of knowledge, lived his life and died in old age.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1694e2 No.855531

His Aion book is very difficult. But the parallel that Jung draws between Christ and Buddha is interesting.

Christ too - like the Buddha - is an incarnation of the self, but in a very different sense. Both dominated the world in themselves: the Buddha, it could be said, through a rational understanding; the Christ, becoming a victim according to destiny; in Christianity, the main thing is to suffer, while in Buddhism the most important thing is to contemplate and do. Both are just, but in the Hindu sense the most complete man is the Buddha. He is a historical personality and, therefore, more understandable to man. Christ is, at the same time, a historical man and God, and therefore more difficult to access.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1694e2 No.855532

His Aion book is very difficult. But the parallel that Jung draws between Christ and Buddha is interesting.

Christ too - like the Buddha - is an incarnation of the self, but in a very different sense. Both dominated the world in themselves: the Buddha, it could be said, through a rational understanding; the Christ, becoming a victim according to destiny; in Christianity, the main thing is to suffer, while in Buddhism the most important thing is to contemplate and do. Both are just, but in the Hindu sense the most complete man is the Buddha. He is a historical personality and, therefore, more understandable to man. Christ is, at the same time, a historical man and God, and therefore more difficult to access.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1694e2 No.855533

His Aion book is very difficult. But the parallel that Jung draws between Christ and Buddha is interesting.

Christ too - like the Buddha - is an incarnation of the self, but in a very different sense. Both dominated the world in themselves: the Buddha, it could be said, through a rational understanding; the Christ, becoming a victim according to destiny; in Christianity, the main thing is to suffer, while in Buddhism the most important thing is to contemplate and do. Christ is, at the same time, a historical man and God, and therefore more difficult to access.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1694e2 No.855534

His Aion book is very difficult. But the parallel that Jung draws between Christ and Buddha is interesting.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

323542 No.855540

What about the common connsensus and people believing the same thing can make something happen or something?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]