[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


| Rules | Log | Tor | Bunker |

File: 860d0a4d6b31e77⋯.jpg (20.76 KB,436x741,436:741,1614269479643_1_.jpg)

d4e499 No.853774

Which church do I go to if I'm really about doing the damn thing. Where do you go if you really want to be a saint and everyones really working toward it im tired of this pep talk of the week.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d34e10 No.853775

File: e6d32b3646509f4⋯.jpg (29.36 KB,600x541,600:541,a42520a01.jpg)

If ye love me, keep my commandments.

- John 14:15

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f02731 No.853777

File: eb6ac45bebfe7bd⋯.jpg (119.66 KB,1516x540,379:135,ZpDVy2s.jpg)

>>853774

>Where do you go if you really want to be a saint

Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity; Protestants generally believe they (baptized Christians) are already saints.

>>853774

>im tired of this pep talk of the week

After several months of attending a low Protestant church, I felt the same way. You start going to church, hear some motivational sermons, get baptized, and… That's it. You're saved, and there's nothing else to strive for, short of memorizing Bible verses or tithing a greater percentage of your income to Pastor Jim. Clearly, such churches do not bear the fullness of faith.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5e8634 No.853783

>>853774

We don't need people wanting to be saints, we need God. Every land is mediocre with weeds and wheat together.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853787

File: f176afc1e5f8954⋯.jpg (137.32 KB,431x646,431:646,Denzinger_s_The_Sources_of….jpg)

File: cdcade3b5f3cf47⋯.png (138.52 KB,302x432,151:216,The_Raccolta_Prayers_and_D….png)

>>853777

I don't think the Catholic position is as complex as you show in your meme.

The sins are listed in the Systematic Index of Denzinger's "The Sources of Catholic Dogma". If you commit a mortal sin or assist in someone else's sin by one of the 9 ways (consent, silence, encourage etc) then you have to repent, confess and do the assigned penance. Do that, and don't die with mortal sin on your soul and it's pretty straight forward.

I mean, yes, there's the mortal sins of disobedience to the Church and the Precepts of the Church (like attend mass on Holy Days of Obligation) which adds to it, but those are straight forward.

Then there's the getting out of Purgatory early or skipping it all together. That's the Raccolta.

What I like about Denzinger's is that it's straight to the source. Most Catechisms are written for children or young adults and some theologians include avoidable proximate occasions of sin as mortal sins based on the assumption that they can't resist temptation.

>>853783

True, but Father said shoot for sainthood! That way if you miss you won't be too far off target.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1f0714 No.853788

File: 755609bbb8ae016⋯.jpg (1.52 MB,2122x1080,1061:540,20190908_093848.jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853794

>>853788

>be sinner.

>Yeah, faith.Got it.

>goes back to sinning and defying God.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1f0714 No.853796

>>853794

Who are you quoting?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853800

>>853796

I'm paraphrasing Luther when he said "sin boldly" because he claimed it annoyed the devil knowing that you could sin and still be saved.

Look, you guys need to either say "faith and stop sinning and do as the Lord says" or shut up with the "faith alone" and misleading souls to hell shtick. That's just double talk and wicked as all get out. It's not faith alone and you guys get all upset when you're called out on it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853801

>>853796

You know Luther, right? The Priest who married the nun and told some rich guy he could have two wives. He also said slaughter the peasants because they took him literally about communal property.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1f0714 No.853802

>>853800

You're very argumentative.

I'm no Lutheran but those criticisms range from legitimate to cherry picks and outright lies. Can you keep it in one of the many threads we've already had on this topic?

Also I just need to keep asking, are you currently involved in a church? Avoiding the question means "no".

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c1d731 No.853803

>>853794

God is neither interested in human "good" (asceticism) nor human "evil" (lasciviousness). Both are filthiness in the eyes of God (Psalm 14:1-3 KJV). Since whatsoever is not of faith is sin (Romans 14:23 KJV), no one can do any righteous and good works without faith. Therefore, while you separate people into "good" and "evil" categories, God only sees sin in all cases, unless they have faith in him.

Since Christ's sacrifice on the cross covers all sins under the law, even murder and adultery are forgiven, as demonstrated by David (2 Samuel 11:3-4,14-17; Psalm 51, 32; Romans 4:6-10 KJV).

God judges you in one of two ways. Either you declare yourself to be righteous, and God judges your righteousness as filthy rags (Isaiah 64:6 KJV) and casts you into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:11-15 KJV). Or, you ask God for mercy because you recognize you are ungodly, and God justifies you and gives you the free gift of eternal life. This is summed up in Luke 18:10-14 KJV.

God can only be pleased by faith (Hebrews 11:6 KJV).

If you demand that God judges a rapist by his works, then he also must judge you by your works (Romans 2:11 KJV) and send you to the lake of fire as well, since "all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23 KJV) and you're just as guilty of sin and worthy of hellfire as he is (Romans 6:23; James 2:10 KJV). Ultimately, you are just saying that you are better than other sinners and that God owes you eternal life due to your own merit, which is completely false and shows man's sinful pride, which is a sin in of itself.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f02731 No.853806

>>853787

You're right, it's really not that complicated. It's simply a matter of following the teachings of Christ and His Church.

>>853788

>might be saved

Will be saved. The Church's teachings are clear, even if some practicing Catholics are humble enough to not be the judge of their own salvation.

>if you get the steps from some heretical horny monk, it doesn't count

Gee, I wonder why that is?

>the Bible says … Faith alone

No it doesn't. Not even in the 66-book version Luther created. 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 (KJV) says

<Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.

Key words: And such WERE some of you… but no longer, because they repented! "Sin boldly" is a disgusting, heretical teaching.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

47fb73 No.853807

>>853803

The view that *all works* in and of themselves are filthiness can only be attained by a flat-out ignorance of the works of the Old Testament prophets, priests and patriarchs, and what Scripture has to say on the matter.

There are many instances where Scripture plainly states that the works of these men were pleasing to God whether that be sacrifices (Gen 4:4, 8:21 etc), or fasting coupled with repentance:

>And God saw their *works,* that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.

Jonah 3:10.

So you provided a citation to Psalm 14; how in light of the Scriptures I've just provided are we then to interpret that short psalm? By actually reading it in context of the very first verse:

>14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. *They* are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

David/the Holy Spirit through him, is clearly talking about the heathen, that not one of them is good. He's not talking about those with faith in God who scripture tells us is pleased by the works of such, and even holds the view that certain people were "righteous" through their faith first and foremost, then by their works. (Luke 1:6)

It is our faith that actualizes our works as pleasing in the sight of God. This is a view that reconciles:

James 2:

>2:17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

>2:18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my ***faith

by my works.***

with Eph 2:

>2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

>2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

To conclude, going back to the parable of the Pharisee and the Publican (Luke 18:9-14), in light of the body of Scipture, I think it's quite clear that the Pharisee was, at least to the extent of God's law, righteous.

Yet he sullied all of it in letting Pride, the greatest of all sins, and the basis of all other sins, get the better of him.

Whereas the publican was exalted because of his sincere contrition and humility before our most merciful and loving God. That humility and contrition was in fact, an act of true righteousness.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853810

>>853802

>You're very argumentative.

And you're not. Why? Because ad homs and making the discussion about me specifically is a logical fallacy.

My use of "You guys" was colloquial usage for "all those who say 'faith alone'" as in "if you believe X, then Y". The "you" is used as an indeterminate hypothetical genderless personal pronoun

When you use "You", it's about the poster.

>I'm no Lutheran but those criticisms range from legitimate to cherry picks and outright lies.

The say why the criticisms are wrong, show why it's neglectful induction. Petulant posts are not discussion. You have to examine the validity of the primace and the soundness of the logic.

> Can you keep it in one of the many threads we've already had on this topic?

Please stop posting.

>Also I just need to keep asking, are you currently involved in a church? Avoiding the question means "no"

Again, you go for the ad hom. What is it with you that you feel a need to attack people and change the subject.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853811

>>853806

>>853807

Both good arguments on the fallacy and folly of "faith alone"!

Luther clearly ignored the parts of the Bible that he didn't like, and good works and giving up sin were clearly things he didn't like.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b2e284 No.853839

File: d213a77ddc5576b⋯.png (34.55 KB,647x559,647:559,a8ad393ca.png)

>>853807

>and even holds the view that certain people were "righteous" through their faith first and foremost, then by their works. (Luke 1:6)

Does this contradict anything in here so far? His point is about anything WITHOUT faith being unrighteous, which it is. That would seem to explain all of the references.

So enough about that attempted diversion. What about justification before God? As we hear from the apostle Paul in Romans 4:5, "But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness."

And again in Romans 5:1, "Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:"

Again, in Romans 11:6, "And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work."

And from all of this it is clear that the justification sufficient to bear the sins of any man has to be of Christ:

Galatians 3:22, "But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe."

Colossians 2:13-14, "And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;"

2 Corinthians 5:21, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him."

So it is the righteousness of God, namely Christ, not their own righteousness, by which a saved person shall be justified before the sight of God. See where it says "made the righteousness of God." That's not man's righteousness. It is Christ's own righteousness imputed to those that believe.

As Paul wrote in Romans 4:6, "Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,"

Again, the New Testament says it over and over again. So many different ways. The only way to deny this central part of the Gospel is to hold the truth in unrighteousness, looking for ways to squirm out from under it, in other words. As it says in Philippians 3:9, "And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:" So again, the righteousness which is of God. Christ justifying the sinner by the merit of Christ, not by the sinner or his works. Our works which cannot reach to justification before God.

None of this is to say that works are discouraged, or going against any other part of Scripture already mentioned. Jesus tells us every work will be rewarded, but this necessarily comes after justification has occurred.

1 Corinthians 3:13-15

"12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble;

13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is.

14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.

15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire."

And again, Revelation 2:23, "I will give unto every one of you according to your works."

Also Romans 14:12, "So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God."

All of this is true, hence why it also says in Hebrews 12, "If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?"

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853845

>>853839

Nice. Cherry picking the parts of the Bible yo like.

Matthew 7:16-20

''16 By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit.

19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire.

20 Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them.

21 Not every one that saith to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: but he that doth the will of my Father who is in heaven, he shall enter into the kingdom of heaven.

22 Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in thy name, and cast out devils in thy name, and done many miracles in thy name?

23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, you that work iniquity.

24 Every one therefore that heareth these my words, and doth them, shall be likened to a wise man that built his house upon a rock,''

There's that Pope Saint Peter the Rock reference again!

No good fruit? Produce wicked fruit? You go to hell.

And you're right, Faith is required. You have to have both, not just Faith or Good works, both Faith and Good works.

No works? go to hell. Not saved.

"Faith alone" is not going to fool the Lord. He warned against this. It isn't heaven for faith and then brownie points for Good works. You accept Christ as Lord and you do what he says.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1f0714 No.853856

>>853845

I can explain the catholic position. Can you correctly explain what sola fide means to protestants, and how it relates to what you just said? Do you know where you're misrepresenting it?

Also, are you a member of a parish? Why wouldn't you want to enthusiastically answer "yes"? It is relevant because your entire point revolves around doing good works in the church. An ad hominem argument is one which attacks the person and not the argument.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853868

File: b247963c8ee7e44⋯.jpeg (48.64 KB,600x336,25:14,brandolini_s_law_on_refut….jpeg)

File: f53d31189576b82⋯.png (701.44 KB,1024x687,1024:687,Trivium_spread_1024x1024.png)

>>853856

Saying you have an argument is not making an argument.

Ad homs, or a red herring where you change the subject to the person disagreeing with you, is not an argument either.

An argument is not a verbal fight; an argument is laying out your premises and using valid logic to tie them together.

Your post where you put out a wall of scripture and ignore the relevant scripture that proves you wrong is the fallacy of neglectful induction. Fallacies of neglectful induction aren't valid arguments. Diversion fallacies are not an argument. Touting your own expertise is an appeal to your own authority fallacy. Appeal to authority works for True Pope speaking ex Cathedra, but not for Southern Baptists.

The point of this post is to explain why you're not getting an answer: the constant using of ad homs and other fallacies does not deserve an answer.

I suggest a study of what logic is, and stop your efforts to waste my time.

You need to explain why you ignore the context of the teachings of Christ about bearing good fruit, and also the need to bear your cross also explained by Christ, in order to obtain salvation.

in other words, tell us why you think Jesus Christ lied to us

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d4e499 No.853871

You guys are wandering from the OP I have been told to begome gadolic so many times I'm starting to believe but why do you go to church on sunday instead of saturday like a jew and muslim why change the day of worship

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1f0714 No.853877

>>853868

Do you have a church?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b2e284 No.853878

File: 7d35db261232a53⋯.jpg (27.2 KB,320x240,4:3,BibleKJV.jpg)

>>853871

The day of worship is every day, anon. As it says in Scripture, Rest in the Lord, and wait patiently for him. Psalms. And in Colossians 2:

"Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ."

And as it says in Romans 14,

"One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.

He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it."

>but why do you go to church on sunday instead of saturday

The reason for this is simply because it's the first day of the week. As the sabbath was the seventh day, so the day after that is the first. It doesn't have to be the only day of worship though and isn't: My church meets on more days than that.

Acts 20:7 says,

>"And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them,"

And as the apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 16:2,

>"Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him, that there be no gatherings when I come."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

419b18 No.853889

>>853871

>why do you go to church on sunday instead of saturday like a jew and muslim why change the day of worship

Because Christ arose from the dead on a Sunday, the first day of the week. When Jesus rose from the dead it was the start of the new covenant of Jesus Christ. Christians and most protestants thus keep Sunday as a holy day and the day of worship.

>>853877

Feel free to start a thread about me because you're off topic.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

47fb73 No.853912

>>853839

>Does this contradict anything in here so far?

No.

>His point is about anything WITHOUT faith being unrighteous

I wholly believe in that too; my reply was formed accounting for his comment as a whole, retroactively applying, thereby addressing the view of works and justification he testified to in the leading paragraphs. Sorry if this wasn't obvious, I guess.

>…all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

Protestantism (and indeed, yourself later in your reply) defines "believe" as a singular act, a single moment in a person's life whereby the gift of faith is awakened and the person is therein "justified" forever by God, as opposed to it being merely the beginning of life centred on Christ, the deliberate implication of this docrine is the work is completed, as if life with Christ isn't a lifelong journey. When someone responds to the altar-call, feels emotional over our Lord, says the sinners' prayer and 'accepts Jesus into their life', and the pastor afterwards tells the man he's 'saved'; yet he goes on to never attend church again, live a life of iniquity, die and be damned to hell, we see this is a result of such false teaching. This is what I, and any other Catholic/Orthodox want to address.

>Colossians 2

not a formula of imputation, but an exhortation to the faithful.. Well, indeed it can be a formula if you take and isolate it from its contextual passages:

>2:5 For though I be absent in the flesh, yet am I with you in the spirit, joying and beholding your order, and the stedfastness of your faith in Christ.

Contrast 'stedfastness' to the opening chapter of Galatians and see why we believe salvation can be lost.

>2:6 As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in Him:

Walk ye in Him, not "be declared ye in Him for having once had true faith". Now, to be fair, the reformed view is he who once had "faith" rejecting God never truly believed. And that saving faith is evidenced by good works and perseverence in faith. The thing is, Lucifer more than has faith in God, he knew Him, beheld His glory and still he turned from Him in his pride. We believe we have this ability to turn from God too.

>None of this is to say that works are discouraged, or going against any other part of Scripture already mentioned. Jesus tells us every work will be rewarded, but this necessarily comes after justification has occurred.

Yeah, and? We're in agreement. Salvation is not by works, I and every orthodox (lower case) Christian affirms that. It's by grace through faith: a faith that begets works. If someone repents in earnest on their deathbed, they'll be saved even having not done any works, but a 'Christian' who lives a long and healthy life attending church every Sunday who bears no fruit? Matthew 3:10, 7:23.

I agree with him (and you) on almost everything he said. The start and middle, just not the end. Only at the conclusion and through a nuance in certain definitions is there a disagreement, the same seemingly minor disagreement (that you've evidently not even picked up on) that basically seperates Protestantism from Catholo-Orthodoxy (the main one from which all other disagreements stem from at least).

>All of this is true, hence why it also says in Hebrews 12, "If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?"

This is a beautiful verse. I simply believe however that the Bible also tells us what will happen should we not embrace and endure our Father's chastening.

To conclude: Our journey with Christ is lifelong. We believe justification/sanctification to be practically synonomous. You believe sanctification to follow one-time justification. We believe first faith marks only the beginning of one's journey with Christ, in the sense that our justification [again, synonomous with sanctification] is a process and can be ceded from in our free will. We both believe that the good exhibited in people is not their own (lest any man should boast) but God through them by the work of His grace. We as Catholics and Orthodox believe we've been saved, are being saved, and will be saved, threefold.

I being a former protestant, simply came to believe the Catholic-Orthodox view to be of a more full view of what Scripture says in its totality.

To quote from the story of St. Joan of Arc:

>Accuser: “Do you know whether or not you are in God's grace?"

>Joan: "If I am not, may God put me there; and if I am, may God so keep me.”

This to me, speaks profoundly of the virtue of humility, which God's grace, we are all in need of.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d34e10 No.853914

>>853912

>the deliberate implication of this docrine is the work is completed,

Yes because as the Lord said while on the cross, "It is finished." This work and righteousness becomes the righteousness of God (as it says in 2 Corinthians 5:21, "that we might be made the righteousness of God in him") which is imputed to those that believe.

I don't see the point in arguing over whether believing is a single moment or a lifetime, because of the fact we know that God is the one behind it. As it says in Philippians 1:6, "Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:"

So then our confidence is not in our ability, it is in God who began a good work and will carry it to completion (see 1 John 5:13 KJV). As it says in Acts 13:48, "And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed."

So you see from this that only those who were ordained to eternal life believed. If they were and are already "ordained to eternal life" then the power rests on God.

As it says also in Ephesians 1:10-12,

"10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him:

11 In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:

12 That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ."

And also in 1 Peter 1:5.

"To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time."

>yet he goes on to never attend church again, live a life of iniquity, die and be damned to hell, we see this is a result of such false teaching.

Yet it says in 1 John 2:19 that "They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us."

>Contrast 'stedfastness' to the opening chapter of Galatians and see why we believe salvation can be lost.

St. Paul in Philippians 2 says the following,

"For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure."

So then if it is God working in those who are saved, we know that it is stedfast. But if it is only men trying to merit themselves without accepting that, then it is not stedfast. The word of the Lord says in the Psalms, "It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man."

>We believe we have this ability to turn from God too.

Up until the glorious day that we are saved this is true. As it says in 2 Peter that many have "denied the Lord that bought them."

>the same seemingly minor disagreement (that you've evidently not even picked up on) that basically seperates Protestantism from Catholo-Orthodoxy

We are individuals, so whatever difference you are thinking of does not necessarily have to exist. I fully believe that sectarian churches have political reasons for disagreeing more than anything. One should place their faith in the inspired word as the final authority for faith and practice. The inspired word is that which God spoke unto us by his Son, as it says in Hebrews chapter 1 and verses 1 and 2.

>and can be ceded from in our free will.

Once someone is saved and their name is written in heaven, they are not prone to being lost any longer. As Christ Jesus says John 5:24, "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

47fb73 No.853920

>>853914

Having read your comment, you seem to have missed most of what I was laying out. Most of your comment is arguing for why it is God, not man, who does good works, yet that point, as I thought I made abundantly clear in my other comment (but obviously not clear enough), is what I and the Catholic Church too completely believes/professes. I believe it is God alone who works through his followers, to His, not their credit. So much of your reply is typed out in vain. Please re-examine what it was that I said/was trying to say.

>I don't see the point in arguing over whether believing is a single moment or a lifetime,

Please think thoroughly over this. It really is the crux of the matter at hand. It's certainly what I've spent all effort in trying to argue over. Because the stance one takes on this could drastically change how they approach their relationship with God -for the rest of their life. However,

>because of the fact we know that God is the one behind it.

That's a valid point. In the grander scheme of things, arguing over this achieves virtually nothing. We should just simply trust in God. That said, I do consider these debates a good way to practice scriptural exegesis, anything that gets one to read their Bible in an earnest search for truth is surely a good thing.

>>We believe we have this ability to turn from God too.

>Up until the glorious day that we are saved this is true. As it says in 2 Peter that many have "denied the Lord that bought them."

What more proof do you need that salvation is an ongoing process throughout our lives that can be actively resisted, potentially lost? (I want to make the minor not to onlookers that this view of the Catholic faith is not semi-Pelagian in that we attribute the first gift of faith solely to the work of God, and all other works that flow forth from.)

Phillipians 2:12: Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

>>I fully believe that sectarian churches have political reasons for disagreeing more than anything.

The united first millenium church and the heresies they fought disagree.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

417e35 No.853930

>>853807

Romans 3:20 KJV

>Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

No flesh will ever be justified by the deeds of the law. If you think obeying the law will save you, then you will never enter the kingdom of God. Repent, and believe the gospel of grace, or suffer the wrath of God due to your filthy rags.

>>853806

The key word is "the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God". Since I am righteous (Romans 4:5, 6:18, 9:30 KJV), I will certainly inherit the kingdom of God, regardless of any sins of the flesh I happen to commit. I am dead, and my life is hid with Christ (Colossians 3:3 KJV). God does not see my sins any longer, instead he sees Christ in me. If Christ can send me to hell then he must also send himself to hell, but this is impossible, as he cannot deny himself (2 Timothy 2:13 KJV).

Romans 6:14 KJV

>For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.

Romans 4:15 KJV

>because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.

Romans 5:13 KJV

>(for until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

>>853920

>Phillipians 2:12

It says "beloved". The beloved means that they are accepted in Christ, who is the beloved (Mark 1:11; Ephesians 1:6 KJV). That means Christ cannot deny them salvation (2 Timothy 2:13 KJV). It also says to "work out" not "work for" your salvation. It is like a muscle; you work it out and it becomes stronger. Your life in Christ becomes greater and greater the more you gain sound doctrine in the inner man. It is referring to the sanctification process. Salvation from hell is already covered and finished by Romans 5 KJV.

The Gospel of the Grace of God which saves lost mankind is: "Christ died for our sins, He was buried, and He rose again the third day" (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV). The Lord Jesus Christ shed His sinless blood to forgive us our sins, but the Bible declares that anyone who rejects the Gospel of Grace will have to pay for his or her sins in the lake of fire for all eternity. Once you trust in that alone, you are sealed unto the day of redemption, guaranteeing your salvation, without fail (Ephesians 1:12-14, 4:30 KJV).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

07e43b No.853935

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d34e10 No.853940

File: ccc7cbf48d49bfd⋯.jpg (445.16 KB,1427x714,1427:714,19349735848.jpg)

>>853920

>Phillipians 2:12: Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

Yes and as it says in the next verse Philippians 2:13, "For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure."

>The united first millenium church and the heresies they fought disagree.

Ah yes, the church has always been united though. We never lost that unity, as it says in Scripture "One Lord, one faith, one baptism." And in Jude, "ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints."

And in Ephesians again, "For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father."

So then provided that the Spirit of truth which the Lord sent, being God, is in this world all along, it is true therefore that we have had access as it says, "through him."

This continues to the present day of course, not only for one millennium.

>anything that gets one to read their Bible in an earnest search for truth is surely a good thing.

Agree, because Hebrews 11:6 says that "he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him."

>and the heresies they fought disagree.

One of the heresies unfortunately is sectarianism. This broadly covers those who teach that, rather than having the word of God be their final authority for faith and practice, substitute other men or institutions. They have branched off from Christianity and each other at various points. But if you look up the definition of the word, the one that occurs at Titus 3:10 (Αἱρετικὸς) it is simply "one who creates factions." This is exactly what the sectarian churches have done, but there is still the church which follows the Scripture. We are congregational; have two offices: the bishop or pastor, and deacon - still with Christ as our only head, and still with Scripture as the rule of faith and practice. As we see, Christ rebuked the Pharisees in his day for teaching for doctrines the commandments of men: Mark 7:7-13 and onward. Yet this is what many have done in supplanting the word of God for manmade devices, which they still use to idolize themselves over God. Some of them may disagree because of political reasons, but they have the same fundamental flaw in that. This would be all your state churches, no matter what variety. They all claim to be universal but the great irony is their non-universality. Possibly one day the One World Religion of the endtimes will be derived from that false spirit of antichrist which does not have Christ as its head but fallible man.

As it says also in Jude, "These be they who separate themselves," Notice the key words there. The sectarians separate themselves, rather than continuing with the church. As it says in 1 John 2:19, "They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us."

The other heresies to which you most likely intend to refer, are simply other heresies. Nothing much else to say about them, except that 'if any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be anathema' (1 Cor. 16:22).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d34e10 No.853941

>>853940

(cont'd)

>It really is the crux of the matter at hand.

Well, like I said in referencing 1 John 2:19, if they go out from us it is only to make manifest that they never were of us. So the problem which you refer has a clear Scriptural answer. It has a Biblical answer here, which does not introduce doubt into the equation for the believer simply because God is the one being relied upon. As it says in 2 Thessalonians 2, "God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth".

As it says in Philippians 2:13, it is God which works in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure. And as Peter wrote in his epistle, God has "begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time."

Also as the apostle John wrote, "These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God."

Finally, as Paul wrote in Philippians 1:6, "Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:"

So then if God has started a good work at one point then He is as good to perform it until the day of Jesus Christ no matter what, each individual who has indeed had that happen can be sure of it. The point remains that. Consider what is written in Scripture here. And this is the "trust in God" that the saved believer possesses - The shield of faith with which they can quench all the fiery darts of the devil. All the people who hurl doubts get stopped by that shield.

It's not faith in man but faith in God.

It all goes down to the pure truth that God cannot lie, due to His perfect nature and His divinity, as it says in Titus 1:2 and Hebrews 6:18-19.

>>853930

>Since I am righteous…

Anon, see 1 Tim. 1:15 on this. Also, how were you able to post on here? I have been trying to post here for the past day and it has been bugging out for almost 24 hours now.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f50927 No.853947

>>853941

>Anon, see 1 Tim. 1:15 on this.

Yes, I was made righteous by God and not by any works on my part (Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV).

>Also, how were you able to post on here? I have been trying to post here for the past day and it has been bugging out for almost 24 hours now.

The board seemed to have temporarily shut down for a couple days.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

aca019 No.854007

File: 7b9c97dde5470f4⋯.jpg (42.36 KB,600x494,300:247,3mLydMU.jpg)

>>853777

Framing the conversation will only work on your fellow papist morons

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]