[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


| Rules | Log | Tor | Bunker |

File: ec20033c0ef4611⋯.jpg (15.31 KB,240x158,120:79,240px_GNT_Committee.jpg)

acd25f No.852013

How have we let evangelicals take over the Bible printing industry? And how have we let them literally create Bibles that include, exclude, and select readings entirely based on their own whims?

The Nestle-Aland critical text that all modern translations are based on is a complete fabrication, it's in no way a true New Testament and its methodology and very concept is inherently wrong and heretical - that we shouldn't use actual genuine manuscripts, but instead create our own through personally deciding what we like and don't like about the Bible.

It's an abomination and needs to be purged.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3b9d97 No.852032

what would a "true New Testament" be?

what about Nestle-Aland is heretical?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5fe945 No.852035

File: e6d32b3646509f4⋯.jpg (29.36 KB,600x541,600:541,a42520a01.jpg)

>>852032

It would be based on the Scriptures we have always had - Anything less is essentially progressive revelation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e1c115 No.852041

>>852032

A true New Testament is the text of a historical genuine manuscript e.g. the Codex Alexandrinus that was created through Christian scribes copying older manuscripts of the original New Testament books.

Whereas Nestle-Aland was created by a committee of german non clergymen in the 19th century who literally created their own New Testament by arbitrarily deciding what verses that would and wouldn't include, and which variations of each verse they would include. It would be like taking many different Bibles, cutting them up and sticking the pieces together based on which parts you like, and then claiming it's the truest New Testament - because that's literally what they did.

And all of their decisions were built on extremely s—ty textual bases I.e. using primarily Egyptian texts because the oldest manuscripts we have are Egyptian, because only the dry climate of Egypt can allow these types of manuscripts to survive. But even in the very early Church, the Egyptian text was recognized as divergent from the text used in the rest of the Christian world. It's extremely braindead "the oldest manuscripts are all Egyptian (because papyrus can't last anywhere else) therefore the Egyptian text is the oldest". It's an asinine methodology, but I would still have more respect for them if they simply printed an Egyptian text like the Codex Sinaiticus in full, instead of making their own text with every scrap of divergent Egyptian text that wildly differs from one to the next.

And this abomination is now the most common New Testament text on earth.

God save us

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5fe945 No.852066

File: 99c6fbe088a135d⋯.jpg (421.46 KB,900x1891,900:1891,a7c92ca7c.jpg)

File: 1c655bf8275bafd⋯.jpg (153.29 KB,638x436,319:218,1a2b0ef0b.jpg)

>>852041

Anon, it's not a New Testament. There have been plenty of corruptions but the true word of God remains- It's just not the critical text.

What happened was a bunch of relativist academics who had studied under the school of higher criticism decided that God had allowed his word to be hidden until modern times, rather than keeping it revealed to every generation, and they figured well if it doesn't have to be the received text, which everyone was using then, therefore there is no basis on which to decide, other than the personal will to power. So from that you get a thousand different versions with their own combination of variations basically whatever they can pass off as a New Testament to the gullible masses. That's why they never advertise the variants and deletions from the received text in their Bibles. They don't want you to know.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

99d0f2 No.852088

Cope and seethe

Evangelicals have always been in change of Bible publishing and the critical text is more reliable

You can always read your KJV or majority text version and we'll keep improving

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5fe945 No.852089

>>852088

Anon, Bible corruption and biblical corruption is not something to be proud of.

Funny how I don't see critical text publishers advertising their work as an "improvement" to the Bible in their mass advertisements… Maybe because they are trying to hide the fact they are changing it and would rather, quite dishonestly, people generally not be aware of it.

If they were I guarantee you people would raise objections. But the publishers dishonestly hold that information back.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0b9c49 No.852093

>>852088

You're literally using a fake bible with no historical basis

>>852089

This, if they included a disclaimer in every modern Bible that the text does not conform to any manuscript on earth and was created by a committee of evangelical Germans in the 19th century that made decisions on what to include purely based on creating a text as different as possible from the Catholic and Orthodox texts, I don't think a single person would use them except the most deluded.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5fe945 No.852117

File: f5fcbf1eb0109a7⋯.jpg (21.03 KB,480x360,4:3,kjv_1.jpg)

>>852093

The fact that they're changing it is already too much.

>was created by a committee of evangelical Germans in the 19th century that made decisions on what to include

The problem is worse, because ever since then they keep changing it with more and more committees, and going in many different directions with the different versions. I believe this is part of Satan's goal in creating a flood of false versions to confuse regular people.

>purely based on creating a text as different as possible from the Catholic and Orthodox texts

I wouldn't say that, because the DRB and versions like that has a lot of the same removals as the critical text. In Matthew 5:22, for instance, or 1 John 4:3, or Ephesians 3:9. Compare the three variations:

Matthew 5. 22.

>KJV: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment:

>NLT: But I say, if you are even angry with someone, you are subject to judgment!

>NIV: But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment.

>DRB: But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment.

Notice how the lower three all remove the words "without a cause." This is because the Greek version they use in their manuscripts are missing those words.

Another two examples:

1 John 4. 3.

>KJV And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God:

<NASB and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God;

<CSB (2k17) but every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God.

<DRB And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God:

Again, all three of the lower versions remove the words "Christ is come in the flesh" from 1 John 4:3. Third example:

Ephesians 3. 9.

>KJV: And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:

>NIV: and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.

>ESV (2001): and to bring to light for everyone what is the plan of the mystery hidden for ages in God, who created all things,

>DRB: And to enlighten all men, that they may see what is the dispensation of the mystery which hath been hidden from eternity in God, who created all things:

Notice how all three of these extra versions remove the words for, "by Jesus Christ." I underlined where these versions, the catholic ones included, removed sections of Scripture from individual verses in the above three examples. There are many more examples like these where the catholic versions are included in removing things. A short list would be: 1 Corinthians 15:47, John 4:42, Romans 1:16, Acts 2:30, Galatians 4:7, 1 Timothy 3:16, John 7:39, Romans 8:1, 1 Corinthians 6:20, Matthew 9:13, 1 Corinthians 5:7, 1 Timothy 1:17, 1 Timothy 6:5, Hebrews 11:6, 1 John 5:13, Revelation 8:13, Revelation 14:1, Mark 1:2, Luke 2:33, Luke 2:43. There are also many Old Testament corruptions in the DRB, like Psalm 2:12, 2 Samuel 21:19 (contradicting 1 Chron. 20:5 within itself), 1 Samuel 13:1, Jeremiah 39:2 (contradicting both Jeremiah 52:6 and 2 Kings 25:3), none of which are problems in the KJV and other received text translations.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a4ba6d No.855091

Tripcode test.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a4ba6d No.855092

>>855091

I just took an L, didn’t I?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]