>>809696
<The dominant view, represented by the Church of Moscow[3], the Greek Archdiocese, the Orthodox Church in America[4], and by the bioethicists Engelhardt and Stanley S. Harakas, may be fairly described as the teaching that non-abortifacient contraception is acceptable if it is used with the blessing of one's spiritual father, and if it is not used to avoid having children for purely selfish reasons.
"Purely selfish" like yeah we think that we aren't ready to have a child right now, maybe when we're 30. We decided to only have 1 child, more than that is hard to raise in this day and age.. and so on. And yes they changed their teaching.
<Some would follow the earlier position taken by the Church of Greece in her encyclical of October 14, 1937[6], which accepted birth control but not contraception, i.e., it accepted abstinence and NFP, but condemned any method of contraception.
This "church" is allowing people to commit one of the worst sins ever that has completely destroyed society.