>>800109
Acts 5:3-4 is the only thing there that matters there, the article DOES NOT dispute the power of the holy spirit. In fact they call the Holy Spirit the most powerful weapon God has ever unleashed thanks to Christ's New Covenant:
>However, this time around, thanks to the New Covenant in Christ’s blood, God was about to unleash His most powerful weapon, the Spirit, for the benefit of all believers.
But let's look at Acts 5:3-4.
>3 But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land?
>4 Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.
>5 And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things.
However, this is not concrete, if God sends a messenger, and if you lie to that messenger, that does not mean that the messenger is God. If God sent us a helper, that doesn't mean that the helper is God, but an extension of his will, just as God uses Angels, which we're not to worship.
Suppose one could also link Job 33:4 to the trinity, but as the article points out:
>Nowhere in the bible does Jesus or anyone say that The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are one. However, the Holy Spirit carries the power of the duality.
>“…stay in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high.” Luke 24:49
>“…the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light.” Genesis 1: 2-4
>God speaks and the Spirit executes.
Guys, this website put forth one heck of an argument.
>>800110
Then why bother replying? If you don't want to quote the word of truth then stay quiet. Let others argue on your behalf, at this point you're just adding noise and wasting your own time as well as everyone elses.