/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>>789111

Nothing. He's just acting like a toddler. Don't engage with children.

>Le me on Discord

Go. Leave and never return to this place.

>>789111 (checked)

Rebuke him and tell him he is objectively wrong. Anyone with half a brain that has read (((Anton LeVay)))'s books can tell you satanists have no morals other than "do what thou wilt" faggotry.

>>789118

LeVay copied almost all of his ideas from Ayn Rand. Which is another strike against them.

>>789111

LeVey was just a Jew doing "performance art". That's all Satanists are in essence.

>>789219

Indeed. It's just stupid larping. The real Satanists are the secret societies and some new agers, who appropriate Christ and steal biblical language. And sadly, fool the simple minded just because they say they're Christian. But like Jesus said, you shall know them by their fruit,

>>789111

>Debunking Satanism

You'd have to define it first.

>>789118

>>789132

>objectively wrong

By what objective metric? Do you mean the claim of being "first"? Obviously that's not true. Perhaps he meant something else. Like the first artificial religion or somesuch nonsense. It is a very strange claim to make.

>>789179

>Ayn Rand [and therefore wrong]

What made you come to this conclusion?

>>789187

>>789219

>>789221

<Just LARPing

The same could be said of all religions. Though some Satanists believe in an actual spiritual essence and others don't. It's not really a group you can put in a box. There's really no core beliefs of "Satanism". It's less unified than even Christians who (at least as far as I know) can all agree that Jesus Christ was for sure real, for sure died on a cross and this is extremely important because that did something otherworldly and good. So far as I know there's nothing Satanists agree on. Not iconography, not philosophy, there's not even an agreement on the nature of the supernatural, divine or spiritual. The closest you could get is to say that "they all agree on being edgy" and even that's a bit of a stretch.

>>789239

Well as a satanist, or any kind of athiest for that matter, he has no basis for morality being a real thing and thus cannot in any intellectual honesty criticize someone for even the worst of crimes, because there's no such thing as "worst". If he's a faggot like most Satanists are then he can't criticize anyone for being homophobic. If fact, he can't even criticize anyone for "wasting their time" or "not having fun" because those things are meaningless either way. He can say "why not do this" all he wants, but "why not" isn't "why."

>>789111

>satanism

>do whatever you want

>do christianity because i can do whatever I want according to their dictum

>>789263

You should read these (if you’re asserting Christianity isn’t any different, can’t tell because I’m pretty sick right now).

>>789132

>>789241

>>789239

Ayn Rand is a repugnant anarchist Jew feminist. Marx’s twin Talmudic sister.

>>789239

https://www.churchofsatan.com/satanism-and-objectivism

https://blog.acton.org/archives/67931-fountainhead-satanism.html

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/pantheon/2011/06/ayn-rand-godmother-of-satanism/

>>789507

Well, I guess that makes sense. Satan is the first Libertarian after all.

You can't debunk Satanism. You can only kill them or exorcise them

>>789737

Not this shit again.

Libertine=/=libertarian. You are being willfully ignorant.

>>794589

So how would a Libertarian society deal with the LGBTQPWTFBBQ community? Ban them or tolerate them?

>>794598

Well, they're walking Petri dishes who actively try and recruit new members, and have a disproportionate number of members with pedophilic tendnecies; 30 to 40% instead of pedos are gay. So.

>>794600

*instead of 2 or 3%

>>794606

I don’t believe they would be. You’re only taking notice of left leaning libertarians. If they were really libertarian, they wouldn’t tolerate how the gay community actively tries to take away their rights.

>>794608

So what you are saying is an authority ought to define and enforce what is love and what is lust and not allow the people to do that themselves?

>>794610

It’s not even a matter of authority, it’s natural law. Homos tread, and will eat lead.

Church of Satan are edgy darwinian materialists, research into refuting that. It's not too difficult with a decent understanding of theology.

Careful with more radical Satanist groups though.

>>789239

>defending Ayn Rand

Yup, cringe compilation.