>>787064
>he arguments from Daniel above are interesting but muslims can point to similar spooky or weird stuff in their holy texts,
see www.answeringislam.com for muslim claims
>a lot of it is too vague,
some of it is pretty convinving, like the daniel one is pretty damn convincing..it even predicted that the heirs of the empire would not be the prince's sons..but it's up to you to believe. The fall of the temple is pretty good too, as the temple was completely destroyed, and the jews were exiled, exactly as Jesus said. But i digress.
Friend, i also deal with doubts everyday..but i have no reason to not believe in God or in Christ, so my own doubts come across as irrational to me..but alas.
Here is also an interesting site: https://revelationrevolution.org/jesus-the-son-of-man-was-seen-in-the-clouds-in-a-d-66/
>But yeah I'm not sure, I definitely think the bible is a "holy text" or guided by something, I'm just not necessarily convinced of the whole religion. Same with the demon arguments above, it doesn't prove Christianity in particular.
i agree..demons in particular dont prove christianity. but in my opinion, prophecy does very much so.
You don't need to respond to this post..just my two cents and some food for thought.