/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

Miss boobs also refute God. and the YouTube comments too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kRk3_Crg3M

So how do we keep faith in this case ?

>>747819

Does he take on the Qur'an?

>>747819

<heh heh, let me tell you about how far-fetched some of these bible stories in the old testament are! the christian right is BTFO!

>puffs plant for 182nd time today

<by the way, don't forget to check out my video on why it makes perfect sense for a biological male to use the women's restroom, and why we should oppose DONALD DRUMPF on limiting muslim immigration!

99% of his videos oppose Christianity exclusively or support braindead leftist causes. The same goes for the thot you linked. Into the trash they go.

>>747863

Good attitude anon

"For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God."

>I mean… COME MON… God? Creating the world? I mean… C'MON MAN. Really? You don't REALLY believe this do you?… I mean… COME ON… Jesus? Rising from the grave? I mean… COME ON… I've never seen anything like that happen today… Like seriously? I mean… COME ON

He doesn't actually make any points, he just goes on a rant trying to make belief in the Bible look ridiculous with oversimplified versions of the stories. The closest thing to a point he does make is the statement that the Bible's age takes away from it's credibility but he ignores all of the historians from the same time period that back it up (Josephus, Pliny The Lesser, just to name drop some off the top of my head).

This guy's a moron. I'd destroy this n00b in a debate any time and any day.

>human life and history struggle is made of murders, crimes, and evil stuff

wow no shit, really? :O

>>747819

I don't watch garbage.

All atheist and anti/christian content is garbage.

>>747950

>anti/christian

anti-christian

>>747903

> He doesn't actually make any points, he just goes on a rant trying to make belief in the Bible look ridiculous with oversimplified versions of the stories.

You can make anything sound ridiculous by over-simplifying it. Here, let me show you, I'll make bread sound idiotic:

< First you take these indigestible plant seeds that humans can't eat and you grind them into a powder. Then you add water to the powder to make a sticky paste. You add some really tiny mushrooms that are so tiny that you can't actually see them, but trust me, they are really in there. So you leave that paste sitting around for like an hour or so, and during this time the mushrooms start eating the paste and then fart into it, which blows up the paste to three times its size, because eating and farting is apparently something mushrooms do. Then you take this mushroom fart balloon and put it in a heated box, where this paste made from indigestible plant seeds and mushroom farts magically turns into perfectly edible bread.

>It helps that the opening chapter of the book is an absolutely ridiculous Creation myth involving God creating light on day 1… but forgetting to create the sun until Day 4. There's a goddamn talking snake. All the evil in the world occurred because someone ate an apple. You don't have to read very far for the warning alarms to go off in your head.

I couldn't make this up as a strawman. Wild that these people actually exist.

>>747942

Conviniently forgets the part where God sends him an angel to tell him to stop.

>>748099

If that was true that means he couldn't turn on a lamp at night since only the sun gives off light.

Just

>>747819

>/pol/ symbol with cross

[-]

>makes a strawman of bible stories

>and that, guys, is why there is no God

The lack of logic in this kind of argument is so obvious that I am surprised people who like to think they are so rational and logical believe it. It is absolutely non sequitur.

For exemple, christians don't beleive in the Quran and think most of it is a bunch of lies, but that does not make them doubt God, but doubt islam. The same logic should be a applied here: if they don't beleive in the bible, than they should only not believe in abrahamic religions, but not deny every single religion and even the ideia of a non-material reality/being. The existence of God does not depends on what religion x or y said; to some extent, many philosophers, like Plato, belived in God/supra-material realities and forms regardless of religion.

Atheists are completely blinded by their ignorance and fear of something they cannot see.

>>747825

Really makes you think

I feel bad for these people who haven't been given the wisdom to get past these basic obstacles or the faith needed to follow Christ.

Why these people aren't nihilists yet is beyond me. Read some Nietszche, Kierkegaard, and Camus, and either accept Christ, commit suicide, or embrace the absurdness of reality and reject morality and do crazy shit

>>751721

Or you could read Carl Jung and then grow up and read the bible.

Until some atheist dismantles the Summa Theologica I have no reason to entertain their intellectual vomiting under any circumstances – and neither do you.

>>749140

/pol/ is a Christian board, newfriend.

>>754961

Its funny that even the top tier atheists never screw around with St. Thomas.

They completely ignore him.

I wonder why.

>>747832

B-b-but Pope Anderson told me the bible WAS God

>>754961

>>755574

There's a reason Christian debaters are barred from using St. Thomas in a debate.

>>755590

Is this true? Wtf?

>>755599

I don't have any evidence but I heard from a friend that they are prohibited. For good reason also. If Christians use St. Aquinas, the debate'd be over in a jiffy.

>>755597

I never though I would see soulburner in /christian/

>>755600

But then the atheists are assuming defeat even before the debate. Or are they so blind I'm their pride that they don't care?

Lol St. Thomas must be laughing hard.