[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / bantifa / doomer / tingles / vg / vichan / wmafsex ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: dc2388202573bc2⋯.jpg (38.79 KB, 500x624, 125:156, 1272896775465.jpg)

666792  No.743243

What do you think about (very)sexually attractive women in media? Should they be portrayed or not?

a6fc8c  No.743245

In a sexual manner?

No.


666792  No.743246

>>743245

Well obviously not just for viewers' carnal pleasure but what if the plot calls for a woman tempting some guy?


0505f7  No.743248

>>743246

This. They shouldn't be displayed licentiously without a better reason than just the audience's gratification.


e02b3b  No.743257

artists can never licitly try to sexually arouse their audiences either as a means or as an end. never

if you can somehow portray the idea of "sexiness" without actually writing or saying or showing anything arousing, that's the ticket, otherwise, stay away


359bf3  No.743347

There will always be soft core porn in media. The media is satan’s domain. What your responsibility is is to keep clean and overcome the sensual temptation.


a26dac  No.743348

>>743243

As your question is worded, literally:

Yes. Sexually attractive women are people too.

As you probably meant:

No.

>>743246

During this situation it would be better if the camera angle was adjusted such as not to focus on the woman, but otherwise, okay.


983c18  No.743354

Most all very attractive people in media nowadays are heavily doctored post filming, have specific lighting and angles used to make them more flattering, have tons of makeup and or plastic surgery, or any combination of the above. I don't think it's good because it portrays a false and oftentimes impossible standard of beauty that leads to people chasing the dragon trying to achieve it to feel satisfied, which is a real convenient way for corporations to sell more product.


61301d  No.743568

>>743246

I remember seeing on TV some random movie from India and everytime someone smoked a there was a written warning telling people smoking was bad for health.

Something similar could be done about this if really needed but the media will never do it because their prime objective is to make people sin and sex is the best way to make them sin.


32f5d8  No.743614

>>743245

Why not? The Bible is full of sexual content: rape, incest, seduction, adultery, fornication etc


cefadb  No.743675

>>743243

cameras, tv's, computers, etc. should all be banned completely. i'm not saying its a sin to use them, just that it would be better if they didn't exist at all. and no i'm not a hypocrite by posting here because even if i went completely off-grid, it would just be lonely as fug because it only works if everyone does it.


7ffef5  No.743769

File: c8609dfbd6f674f⋯.jpg (54.75 KB, 640x640, 1:1, c86.jpg)


b4cf3e  No.744021

>>743614

The bible talks about them because those stuff happen irl.

It doesn't describe them in detail like the 50 shades of grey or any other book or movie today.

The bible just says. Shit happened and then a punishment usually follows.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / bantifa / doomer / tingles / vg / vichan / wmafsex ]