/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship★

>>738068

god made woman before the fall tho.

>>738074

>MFW this post

>>738045 (OP)

>we guys … we're sooooooo sinless compared to these heathen women … Oh, how disgraceful they are and how awesome we are …

Sounds familiar ….

… now, where did I ….

… Oh, that's right …

< The Pharisee stood by himself and prayed: 'God, I thank you that I am not like other people -- robbers, evildoers, adulterers – or even like this tax collector.

>>738045 (OP)

Hey OP, why don't you go become a Muslim or a Mormon if all you want is endless celestial sex.

>>738062

>even in heaven i won't be able to get my rocks off

kek incel rage

>why the winnie the pooh did god even give me a cock and balls if i'm not even allowed to use the winnie the pooh things. they cause me nothing but strife

Well, the last statement is abundantly true, but let us consider this … all things on earth, things that are good, are mere portents of the Godly bliss that is to come. Yes, even that blissful moment buried inside sex is but a mere shadow of the joy we will yet have. Men and women were made to revel in the glory of God, to worship Him, yes, but worship not derived from a sense of duty, a sense of detached obedience, but out of pure wonder, delight, astonishment, and delight. As St Paul says, we see dimly through a mirror (and their's back then were just polished metal), so life here, even in Christ, is the barest whiff of a shadow of the bee's dick of what we will have going on when God is before us in the fullness of His glory. Sex, compared to this, will be utter irrelevance.

So, word to the wise: stop worrying about what you don't get now, and make dang sure you're on God's guestlist.

tl;dr Where we're going, we don't need sex

>>738110

>>738090

When a man and a woman love each other very much they get married. This bond of marriage bonds the two both physically and spiritually, making them both one flesh (Mark 10:8). The earthly marriage may end in heaven, but the love that they share with each other won't. If it did, than the gnostics were right and nothing on this world matters.

And before you get your knickers in a twist, yes the OT does reafirm this as well with 2 Samuel 12:23. For when King David's infant son died, King David knows he can't bring back his child, but he knows he will be reunited with his child in heaven.

So to say husbands won't be reunited with their wives in heaven is misguided and wrong as all good christians will be reunited with those they love in Heaven.

>b-but Jesus said…

I know what Jesus said. I also know what the Pharisees were trying to do when they proposed that question to him. They were trying to trap him in OT law, where if a husband produces no children his brother marries the widow to take care of her and continue on the bloodline. This was during the time when jewish bloodlines mattered. Now that we live in the NT, they don't matter. Those marriages weren't about love, but about duty.

>>738113

more like volcel rage, i'm not a degenerate. but anyway, my dick is here right now tho. how am i supposed to just ignore it?

>>738106

I mean, I'm confused, are you a Christian or are you not? Are you supposed to give into every gratification? Are you going to do what Jesus told you to do and pick up that cross and carry it? What was up with Jesus Christ fasting for 40 days or dying on the cross for your sins, my sins?

You know Jesus says in the Bible that the road to Hell is wide while very few find the narrow road. It's your choice and don't kid yourself, none of us feel any pity for your whiny little ass because all of us are in the same God-forsaken boat as you are. So either get in line or get out.

>>738119

Yep, this guys a giant heresy factory, and so is this thread. Literally a heresy thread. If only heresy laws were still being enforced… Heresy, i've seen so far. God Created a fallen creation from the start, as part some Evolutionary purpose, so Theistic Evolution double heresy, The belief that we're just going to be pure spirits in heaven, not having a Resurrected, Spiritual body. And the cake to top it off. Protestant quasi theology at that trying to support it. But lets just call it what it is, Gnosticism. Literally what is else it? Gnostics gtfo. Please. Sage, sage, sage.

>>738057

>>738068

>>738074

>>738105

>>738126

>>738156

>implies understanding what heaven is

>takes genesis literally instead of metaphorically

>demeans women as only fraction of man, not separate individuals

Wow.

You need help bro.

damn it OP I didn't know drinking energy drinks and owning a cellphone were sins

>>738120

I am not married and alone. I don't love my family because they've done wicked things, and I never felt loved by them, but I get along with them.

Am I going to be alone in heaven? I tried so hard to be a good man and find a wife, but I failed.

I'd rather be alone honestly. I was never much of a people person in life anyway.

>>738597

>posts scripture in post

<durrrr your findings are unbiblical

Bruh, just read your Bible anon. It's very easy.

>>738613

>>posts scripture in post

You mean this:

>>738120

>When a man and a woman love each other very much they get married. This bond of marriage bonds the two both physically and spiritually, making them both one flesh (Mark 10:8).

What anon writes is NOT scripture. It's only a reference to scripture. The ACTUAL scripture says, and I quote:

< and the two shall become one flesh’; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh.

Where in that statement does it say:

>bonds the two both physically and spiritually

Perhaps you meant this reference:

>2 Samuel 12:23

< But now that he is dead, why should I go on fasting? Can I bring him back again? I will go to him, but he will not return to me.”

Again, says nothing about wives and husbands in heaven. Indeed, it doesn't actually say anything about anything more than David knows he will go where his son is, but the reverse is not possible.

All of which is dancing around the issue: Anon is clearly contradicting scripture, and all of historical Church teaching, by insisting that:

>to say husbands won't be reunited with their wives in heaven is misguided and wrong

… and follows it up by negating Jesus' teaching to the pharisees by suggesting Jesus was just rebuking the pharisees, that he was ONLY talking about:

>marriages weren't about love, but about duty.

Wrong.

We DO NOT infer meanings into plain scripture.

< For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. Mt 22:30 (ESV)

There's no need to infer, to interpret, to weasel words and meanings out of what Jesus very plainly said.

So, just as you say, I repeat back to you:

>Bruh, just read your Bible anon. It's very easy.