>>733443
>He said it's a good historical book about Jesus better than the gospels
Well, there's your first red flag. Not even a minute into looking this book up, and I can already see it's a mix of history revisionism and perverted Jewish filth.
>the author(s) graphically deride every aspect of the virgin birth: Jesus' father was a villain, the conception happened by rape and adultery, and Jesus' mother was menstruating at the time of conception
Just another case of immature, sick, hateful Jews slandering Mary and her Son. I wouldn't waste your time reading it.