/aus/ - Australia★

The fuck you mean 'we'? Free speech, even if those utilizing it the loudest are brain-dead morons. Most of the population not indoctrinated to that shit can see how dumb the fags who are act, they dig their own graves

>>130138 (OP)

just ignore them

these accusatory 'phobias' are the ideological appropriation of medical terminology, referring to non-existent psychiatric disorders, used in political discourse, by non-medical professionals, to misdiagnose and pathologise ideological disagreement - ultimately providing an argument no better than calling someone a scaredy cat.

ho ho.

>>130154

>>130143

why not trick them into doing it in a muslim area

>>130143

>Free speech

Go back to reddit. Faggots, shitskins and women don't deserve free speech.

>>130163

>rundle mall

you have been there right?

Is John attending?

>mfw /aus/ actually doesn't have any mentally unstables I can bait into doing a totally ebik hate crime irl

>>130174

Careful mate, don't want to cut yourself on that edge

>>130174

Go back to reddit, no muslims on my board

>>130138 (OP)

how about we pay one guy to storm into adelaide state parliament wearing a nazi fursuit? That should let them understand how the real adelaide operates

>>130138 (OP)

> being gay is normal because the tv says so

> being scared of things is totally not allowed

> tfw our evolution included a simple automated genetic pruning function

They embarrass themselves with attention seeking parades and narcissism festivals. It is bad that children have to witness such displays of perversion though.

> homophobia

No such thing that I've ever seen.

Have you ever seen someone suffering from a phobia? They are practically crippled with fear.

See a huge faggot trying to be in-your-face and you either DGAF or just shake your head thinking he's a wanker.

I've never seen anyone scream in terror and try to run away from a homosexual.

So sick of this attitude trying to call everything a phobia. I know they're just trying to illicit the response of "Phobia? Fuck that, I'm not scared. Look, I'll suck a dick right now to prove it to you!"

"I let [race] men fuck my wife to prove I'm not racist!"

"I want my country overrun by religious nutters, to prove I'm not Islamophobic!"

Put Kingswood Country back on TV.

>>130215

Do you think homosexuality is a choice?

>>131181

So I should choose to like homo's? Wouldn't that imply that i can choose what i like?

>>131346

What can't you answer my question?

>>131351

Your question doesn't identify as binary, so no, i refuse to stereotype the answer

>>131381

I'll take it then you think homosexuality is a choice which means you're either ignorant/uneducated or retarded. Likely both.

>>131428

And i guess you think you can stroll down to the hospital and tell me which of twenty newborns are gay.. How very learned you are

>>131428

We don't really get to choose a lot of what we learn until we leave school, why is choice so important to your narrative?

> If you didn't choose pain, and you weren't born in pain, how could you possibly experience pain

>>131436

>>131437

>HOMOSEXUALITY IS A CHOICE

Good job confirming you are uneducated and a moron.

>>131461

Such is fate, but what can you do

It's not like i could choose to be a mormon

>>131461

> Homosexuality is completely involuntary, like tourettes. It's definitely not a choice or anything anyone would ever or should ever choose.

> If homos could get treatment they definitely would, because it's not something they ever chose or wanted

> the liberation of being told how you are is not something you could ever hope to change

Talk about oppressive

>>131482

>It's not like i could choose to be a mormon

Except you can.

>>131520

Are you retarded?

>>131529

Isn't wanting something a bit like choosing something though?

>>131537

People don't choose their sexuality.

>>131547

But won't same sex couples try to have gay children? Choice v influence ?

>>131181

This Leftist gambit is so boring. According to Leftists, homosexuality both is and isn't a choice depending on how it suits their propaganda at that moment. The answer, as the very people who generate this rhetoric are keenly aware, is that homosexuality is both due to genetic predispositions, and classical conditioning of sexuality.

There is a core of homosexuals who, without any particular conditioning, will act in homosexual ways. There are others who are receptive to being conditioned to manifest homosexual behaviour. The goal of core homosexuals is to target this second group to increase the overall number of "homosexuals", not only to increase their collective bargaining power, but to increase their number of potential partners.

Of course, the common homosexual will perceive this process as simply "encouraging others to explore their sexuality", and "helping others out of the closet", but the people who are smart enough to organise and pursue this goal do so cynically and explicitly as a rejection of heterosexuality and tradition for selfish and pathological reasons.

>>131553

>>131654

Nobody chooses their sexuality and I'm not a leftist.

>>131706

There is still what you would ultimately call a "Deciding Factor" though, regardless of whether it is accessible

>>131706

Yes, you can actually "choose" your sexuality by consciously conditioning yourself to enjoy something.

In principle:

>Classical conditioning of sexual arousal in women and men: effects of varying awareness and biological relevance of the conditioned stimulus.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14739689

>Classical conditioning of sexual arousal has previously been demonstrated in human males but not in females. This study explored the role of classical (Pavlovian) conditioning in the activation of genital sexual arousal in both women and men, and assessed the effects of varying conditioned stimulus (CS) duration (subliminal/conscious) and relevance (sexually relevant/irrelevant).

>Both women and men showed more evidence of conditioning to the abdomen than to the gun when the CS was presented subliminally. When consciously perceived CSs were used, however, gender differences emerged. Men again showed the expected cue-to-consequence specificity but women showed the opposite effect, that is, conditioned arousal to the sexually irrelevant rather than to the relevant CS. The latter finding may be due to increased autonomic nervous system arousal associated with the irrelevant CS (gun). Skin conductance responses indicated more general arousal to the gun than to the male abdomen in women. This is the first study to compare the effects of a subliminal and conscious CS and to find classical conditioning of sexual arousal in women.

Specifically related to the topic discussed:

>A Review and Analysis of Research Studies Which Assessed Sexual Preference of Children Raised by Homosexuals

http://borngay.procon.org/sourcefiles/TrayceHansen.pdf

>Based on the average found in the following nine studies, 14% of children raised by homosexual parents develop homosexual or bisexual references. These studies reported rates of non-heterosexuality ranging from 8% to 21%. The most frequently reported percentages were 14% and 16% (two studies each). For comparison purposes, data from the best national surveys report that approximately 2% of the general population is non-heterosexual (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, and Michaels,1994). Therefore, if these percentages hold true in better designed studies, children raised by homosexuals appear to be about seven times more likely to develop homosexual or bisexual preferences than children raised by heterosexuals.

>I'm not a leftist.

Whether or not you think you're a Leftist is as immaterial as whether or not another retard thinks he's male. What you think and what is real are entirely separate. If you subscribe to Leftist thought, you are a Leftist. Playing this game of pretending the very research that Leftists use to inform their social engineering isn't real or valid is central to Leftism.

>>131724

Sexuality is not a choice.

>>131738

And yet here we are deciding the future sexuality of our nation

>>131706

I think it's both (((natural))) and a "choice"

A person can have a mental illness and thinks it's natural or can be a choice where they have been conditioned to think they're born like that

i thought this kind of autism was limited to victoria and america.

thanks for the warning /aus/

havent been to rundle in a month or two but i'll keep an ear open for raging faggots

Do we need to have a national discussion about international fads?

Denmark was the first population to implement gay marriage

> population of 5,711,837 managed a 21,087 net increase of which 19,368 was net immigration this year ?

- http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/

mfw Gay peer pressure at the international level

It's all supposedly "white nations"

Is this some sort of conformist racism thing?

> the analyses suggest that there are more than 8 million adults in the US who are lesbian, gay, or bisexual, comprising 3.5% of the adult population. Of men, 2.2% identify as gay and an additional 1.4% as bisexual. Of women, 1.1% identify as lesbian and an additional 2.2% as bisexual.

Even gays are discriminating against women, tending to prefer men-only to both or both to woman only in 2 out of 3 cases?

>>130138 (OP)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYvAYwpUDv8

Don't give them marriage, civil unions exist for a reason.

>>131883

Besides being fairly culturally insensitive and generally offensive, what are the reasons for having ss marriage over civil unions ?

>>131911

Aren't civil unions similarly controlled and governed by the state, reasonably available to citizens regardless of lgbt status

> Marriage also has particular social values and recognition attached to it

Yes, that is what is being argued for the preservation of

/images are currently disabled

if same sex couples can't replicate the particular social values and recognition attached to marriage through civil union, then what is calling it married going to achieve?

There's only a few rules really when it comes to traditional marriage, Single partner / opposite sex / lifelong commitment, is essentially it

If you want to ask why one, then why any of them if not for tradition as old as the hills?

Committing to love one or more of a bunch of people for just a few years could also be considered for these new age unions? (lol)

Does fidelity even matter to ss couples when there is not even a chance of illegitimate offspring?

And you're probably using ivf with perfectly functioning organs to boot

You'd call those doctors negligent if they were handing out antibiotics

Do we need to ban the immigration of GMO-babies?

Really, if most of these same sex couples are barely even mature enough to partner up with another opposite sexed gay couple and deal with the reality of the nature of parent genders…

>>130174

top kek. Stay away from my delicious bacon you fag mozzie

There is no freedom of speech in this country so you can't.

>>130138 (OP)

wtf I'm in adelaide I didn't even know about this lmao

> IVFAustralia has been proudly creating LGBTQI families for over a decade and our dedicated donor team can help guide you through the process.

> LGBTQI families

> These singles, gays, and lesbians are sometimes called “dysfertile” as opposed to “infertile” to emphasize their social (rather than just biological) obstacles to reproduction.

> singles

> just

> Singles are infertile too

> The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the inability to reproduce qualifies as a health-impairing disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Gimmie my disability payment for being single lol

- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dov-fox/it-is-time-for-the-us-to-_b_2900323.html

> There comes a time in a gay's life where they began getting the hetero urge to reproduce, but they are simply too heterophobic

>>132427

Ah, the irony of gays fearing that they might like hetero sex and their loss of identity

Procreation is between a man and a woman, so is marriage

Other recreational activities need not apply

* celebrates the annual Forced Smile Street March Oppressive Pride day early

>>130193

How much cash ya got, cunt?

>>131015

Fuck yes! Kingswood Country was fucking great.

>>131461

You're obviously a poofter. It's no more a choice than being addicted to durries is though, I guess. You've had a "taste", if you will, and just can't stop.

Sorry guys, I'm just drunk shitposting from bed and the sun is coming up. Just saw how old these posts are.

Still posting though.

Capital intelligence territory perhaps…

> As reported previously, United States citizens may be listed as targets for killing in the database.[7] Suspects are not formally charged of any crime or offered a trial in their own defense.[8] Obama administration lawyers have asserted that U.S. citizens alleged to be members of Al Qaeda and said to pose an "imminent threat of violent attack" against the United States may be killed without judicial process.[9] The legal arguments of U.S. officials for this policy were leaked to NBC News in February 2013, in the form of briefing papers summarizing legal memos from October 2011.[9]

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disposition_Matrix