>>8871
>whether he's more christian or pagan overall
Heidegger is the most anti-Christian philosopher, beyond even Nietzsche, which makes sense as he is the heir of Nietzsche. The very essence of his thinking is through and through a repudiation of Christianity in all aspects.
MH has certainly not "mixed the two", and is no mere "pagan". You might consider Heidegger's thinking a pure atheism, devoid of semi-religious pretensions of modern atheism like that of Marx, indeed very much against that style.
What is the goal of that pure atheism? A pure racism, essentially, one that incorporates not only biological claims but also, more importantly, the historical component of human experience as a defining feature of collective consciousness: the Volk. So, Odin becomes once again meaningful not because he actually exists in the sky, but because he is Ours (identity politics).
Of course, Heidegger doesn't like to explain himself in superficial terms, understandably, so less experienced readers tend to be misled. And indeed, his experience in 1933/1934 led him to be permanently cynical about the possibility of this "pure atheism". Hence, the later Heidegger creates as a substitute what he calls "the Last/Ultimate god".
The Last/Ultimate god: all gods hitherto have been iterations of being, and the locale of this iteration are mortals. Hence, gods are expressions of certain peoples/Volk: of a people's Will to Power. Unlike all previous gods, the Last god is the god that is aware of being's eventuation…