I've been browsing the writer's blog and a lot of the information seems rather sketchy, like he just patched together some anti-Christian history from a bunch of random sources. For instance he says
>Between 590 and 604, Pope Gregory I "The Great" ordered to burn the contents of the Palatine Library in Rome, due to the "pagan" writings it housed.
If you look that up you find ((Isaac D'Israeli)) writing about it and some fruitcake called J. M. Roberts who got his information from ghosts, however they both give the same account of Pope Gregory burning the library. It seems likely that they ultimately source from John of Salisbury, who's account comes far too late, and is patently wrong.
Ammianus Marcellinus, who was contemporary to the event, writes (Amm. Marc. 23.3.3):
>[3] Here, as Julian slept, his mind was disturbed by dreams, which made him think that some sorrow would come to him. Therefore, both he himself and the interpreters of dreams, considering the present conditions, declared that the following day, which was the nineteenth of March, ought to be carefully watched. But, as was afterwards learned, it was on that same night that the temple of the Palatine Apollo, under the prefecture of Apronianus, was burned in the eternal city; and if it had not been for the employment of every possible help, the Cumaean books 1 also would have been destroyed by the raging flames.
So the library was actually burned down in AD 363, several centuries before Gregory